ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Workmg Party on Inland Water Transport
INVENTORY OF MAIN STANDARDS AND PARAMETERS OF THE E WATERWAY NETWORK
"BLUE BOOK First Revised Edition
UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2006
NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
I
UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E. 06.11.E.12 ISBN 92-1-116946-1
I
PREFACE At its fortieth session in 1996, the UNECE Working Party on Inland Water Transport (SC.3) agreed to proceed with the drafting of the so-called "Blue book" which would contain technical characteristics of European inland waterways and ports of international importance (E waterways and ports) identified in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN). The first edition of the Blue Book was published in 1998 as TRANS/SC.3/144. The objective of the 'Blue book" is to establish an inventory of existing and envisaged standards and parameters of E waterways and ports in Europe and to show, on an internationally comparable basis, the current inland navigation infrastructure parameters in Europe as compared to the minimum standards and parameters prescribed in the AGN Agreement. This would enable member Governments and intergovernmental organizations concerned to use the "Blue book" as a basic instrument for monitoring the progress made in the implementation of the AGN. This first revised version of the "Blue book" has been prepared by the Transport Division in accordance with the instructions of Governments as set out in TRANS/SC.3/144 and Adds.1-4 and additional information received by the secretariat from member Governments and river commissions. The revised "Blue book" is based on the AGN Agreement, as amended in accordance with the Depositary Notification C.N.670.2006.TREATIES-4 of 29 August 2006 and reflected in ECE/TRANS/lZO and Corr.1 and TRANS/SC.3/168/Add.l.
This page intentionally left blank
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1.
INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
2.
BOTLENECKS AND MISSING LINKS I N THE NETWORK OF MAIN INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
3.
COASTAL ROUTES
4.
EXPLANATIONS OF TABLES 1,2 AND 3
TABLE 1:
NAVIGATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIN EUROPEAN INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
TABLE 2:
PARAMETERS OF LOCKS OF INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
TABLE 3:
TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INLAND NAVIGATION PORTS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
SCHEME OF THE NETWORK OF INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
This page intentionally left blank
INVENTORY OF M A I N STANDARDS AND PARAMETERS OF THE E WATERWAY NETWORK "BLUE BOOK" INTRODUCTION
1.
INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
The European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance in its annex I11 stipulates the requirements for the classification of E waterways. I n total, 27,913 km of European inland waterways have been earmarked by Governments as E waterways. The above length excludes the double counting of sections on which two or more E waterways overlap. The breakdown by classes of inland waterways of international importance may be summarized in the table below.
Less
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
1,489
4,484
3,969
3,270
5,055
667
5,766
1,592
1,621
27,913
5.3
16.1
14.2
11.7
18.1
2.4
20.7
5.7
5.8
100
class V ~ C 5.7 %
WVlI 5.8%
Msdrg link 5.3 %
Lessthan class IV 16.1 %
ClassVlb 20.7 %
class IV 14.2 %
Class Vla 2.4 %
amvb 18.1 %
ClassVa 11.7%
2
Inventoly of Mam Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
I n accordance with the AGN Agreement only waterways meeting the basic minimum requirements of class I V (minimum dimensions of vessels: 80.0 m X 9.50 m) can be considered as E waterways. The Agreement recommends that the new E waterways to be built (for the completion of missing links) should meet at least the requirements of class Vb, while the waterways to be modernized should meet the requirements of at least class Va.
2.
BOTTLENECKS AND MISSING LINKS I N THE NETWORK OF MAIN INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE
I n the course of its work on the draft AGN the Working Party SC.3 endorsed the following definitions of "bottlenecks" and "missing links" in the inland navigation network, elaborated by the ad hoc Group of Experts on Inland Waterway Infrastructure: "Those sections of the European waterway network of international importance that have parameter values being substantially lower than target requirements are called bottlenecks. There are two kinds of bottlenecks: "Basic bottlenecks" are the sections of E waterways whose parameters at the present time are not in conformity with the requirements applicable to inland waterways of international importance in accordance with the new classification of European inland waterways (class IV); "Strategic bottlenecks" are other sections satisfying the basic requirements of the class I V but which, nevertheless, ought to be modernized in order to improve the structure of the network or to increase the economic capacity of inland navigation traffic. "Missing links" are such parts of the future network of inland waterways of international importance which do not exist at present. The basic condition for the elimination of bottlenecks and completion of missing links is the positive result of economic evaluation" (TRANS/SC.3/133, paragraph 18). I n accordance with the above definition the following list of bottlenecks and missing links, by countries, has been established.
3
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
Austria Missina links: Danube-Oder-Elbe Connection (E 20). Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateqic bottlenecks: Danube (E 80) from 2,038.0 to 2,008.0 km and from 1,921.0 to 1,873.0 km - low fairway depth (in some locations down to 2.20 m).
Belarus Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Mukhovets (E 40) from Brest to Kobrin - low maximum draught (1.6 m). Dneprovsko-Bugskiy Canal (E 40) from Kobrin to Pererub (1.6 m).
- low maximum draught
Pina (E 40) from Pererub to Pinsk - low maximum draught (1.6 m). Pripyat (E 40) from Stakhovo to Pkhov - low maximum draught (1.3 m). Pripyat (E40) from Pkhov to Belarus/Ukrainian border (1.5 m).
-
low maximum draught
Inventon/ of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
4
Belgium Missins links:
-
Meuse - Rhine link.'/ Maldegem - Zeebrugge (E 07).
Basic bottlenecks:
-
Kanaal Bocholt - Herentals (E 01-01), Bocholt - Dessel section. Zuid
- Willemsvaart (E 01-01),
section Bocholt - Belgium/Netherlands border.
Gent - Oostende Canal (E 02), Brugge - Beernem section. Harelbeke - Halluin lock (E 02) under way.
-
upgrading from class I 1 t o class IV. The project is
Plassendale - Nieuwpoort Canal (E 02-02-01). Charleroi-Bruxelles Canal (E 04), Lembeek - Bruxelles section under bridges and improvement of the waterway is required. Bossuit - Kortrijk Canal (E 05-01), Zwevegem
- upgrading the height
- Kortrijk section.
- Dender (E 05-04), Aalst - Dendermonde section.
-
Canal de Lanaye (E 01)
- building of a class VIb lock. The project is under way.
Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Meuse (E 01) from Pont d'Ougr6e to Liege envisaged.
-
-
Lys Mitoyenne - Lys (Menin - Deinze section) and Lys Derivation Canal up to Schipdonk (E 02) - upgrading from class IV to class Vb is envisaged within the Seine - Escaut link project.
upgrading from class Vb to class VIb is
- Bruxelles - Schelde (E 04) - upgrading from class Va to class VIb is envisaged.
-
Albertkanaal (E 05), Wijnegem passage and section Kanne - Li&ge class Vb to class VIb is envisaged.
-
upgrading from
This link Is not mentioned in the AGN Agreement and its inclusion Into the Inventory has been suggested by the Government of Belgium.
Inwentow of Main Standards and Rnmatw of the E Wacrrmv wetwork
5
Bulgaria Missina links: none Basic bottlenecks: none Strateaic bottlenecks: Danube from 845.5 to 375.0 km - low fairway depth at dry seasons (below 2.50 m - value recommended by the Danube Commission) at several critical sections i.e.:
-
from 845.5 to 610.0 10-15 days a year, and
km,
with fairway depth limited to 2.10-2.20m
for
from 610.0 to 375.0 20-40 days a year.
km,
with fairway depth limited to
for
1.80-2.00111
Croatia
-
Missina links: Danube Sava Canal (E 80-10) from Vukovar to Samac. Basic bottlenecks: Sava (E 80-12) from SerbianICroatian State border to Sisak upgrading from class I11 to class Vb is required.
-
Strateaic bottlenecks: none.
Czech Republic
-
Missina links: Danube Oder - Elbe Connection (E 20 and E 30). Basic bottlenecks: Elbe (E 20) from State border to ~ s t nad i Labem - extremely low fairway depth at dry seasons (0.9-2.0 m), in the years 1997-2004, the draught was less than 1.40 m during 160-262 days a year making the section commercially nonnavigable; the construction of two locks is necessary. Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Elbe (E 20) from Mrlnik to Chvaletice - low height under bridges (3.4 m) and narrow wldth of lock gates (12.0 m); from Chvaletice to Pardubice the construction of one lock is necessary.
-
Vltava (E 20-06) From Mrlnik to Praha narrow width of lock gates (11.0 m).
-
-
low height under bridges (4.5 m) and
6
Inventory of Main Standards and Pararneten of the E Waterway Network
Finland Missino links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks: Saimaa Canal (E 60-11) from Vyborg (Russian Federation) to Kuopio/Joensuu upgrading to class Va is envisaged.
-
France Missina links:
-
Rhbne - Rhine Canal (E 10)~' Seine - Moselle Link (E 80).
- Seine - Escaut Link (E 05).
-
Sabne - Moselle Link (E 10-02).
Basic bottlenecks: Meuse (E 01-02) between Givet and the Belgian border - upgrading to class N. Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Rhine (E 10) from Iffezheim to Niffer - length of convoys is limited by 183 m, upgrading t o class VIb (186.5 m). The project is under way.
-
Oise (E 80) from Conflans to Creil low height under bridges (5.18 m), from Creil to Compiegne low draught and height under bridges (2.50 m and 5.76 m, respectively).
-
Oise (E 80) increasing the water draught up to 3.5 m between Creil and Conflans Sainte-Honorine.
-
Moselle (E 80) - lifting of bridges between Metz and Apach enabling 3-layer container transport.
-
Network Nord Pas-de-Calais (E 02 and E 05) with Belgium to class Va.
-
Dunkerque (4.44 m).
-
Detlle and Defile Canal (E 02) from Quesnoy/DeOle to Lille - upgrading to class Va is under way, from Lille t o Bauvin - low height under bridges (5.06 m).
-
-
- lifting of bridges and upgrading of links
Escaut link and Escaut (E 01) up to Conde
-
low height under bridges
The secretariat has been informed by the Government of France that the project concerning the Rh6ne - Rhine Canal (E 10) had been abandoned.
Inventoly of Main Standards and Paramden of the E Watewav Network
7
Germany Missing link: none. Basic bottlenecks:
-
Saale (E 20-04) from Halle to Elbe upgrading to class I V is under way. Mittellandkanal (E 70) - sections which have not yet been modernized are being upgraded to class Vb. The project is under way.
- Elbe - Havel - Kanal (E 70) - upgrading t o class Vb is under way. - Untere Havel - WasserstraDe (E 70) from Plauen to Spree
-
upgrading to class Vb is
under way.
- Berlin region waterways (various sections) upgrading to class IV and higher classes is under way.
-
Havel - Oder - WasserstraDe (E 70)
- upgrading to class Va is under way.
Strateoic bottlenecks:
-
Rhine (E 10) - low fairway depth at dry seasons: downstream from Duisburg (2.5 m) and from St. Goar to Mainz (1.9 m).
-
Datteln - Hamm Kanal (E 10-01) to the West of Hamm Harbour - upgrading to class Vb is under way.
-
Rhine - Herne Kanal (E 10-03) - upgrading to class Vb is under way on sections which have not yet been modernized.
- Dortmund
-
Ems Kanal (E 13) from 108.3 km to 21.5 km
-
upgrading to class Vb is
under way.
-
Weser (E 14) from 360.7 km to Minden - low fairway depth (2.5 m).
- Elbe (E 20) from Lauenburg upstream to the border between Germany and the Czech Republic low fairway depth at dry season (1.4 m).
-
- construction of second lock chambers is under way. - Main (E 80) upstream from Wurzburg - low fairway depth (2.5 m). - Danube (E 80) from Straubing to Vilshofen - low fairway depth (1.55 Mosel (E 80)
m).
Other bottlenecks, the elimination of which is anticbated to become economicallv viable ~ n l in v the framework of a re~lacementDroaramme SUDDO&~ bv a Darticular investment scheme:
- Weser (E 14) - upgrading of Minden and Dowerden Locks.
-
Dortmund - Ems Kanal (E 13) to the North of the Mittellandkanal have a width of only 10.00 m.
- a number of locks
- Datteln - Hamm Kanal (E 10-01) - to the East of the Hamm Harbour.
8
Inventory of Mam Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
-
Canals branching off from the Mittellandkanal (E 70-02, 70-04 and 70-06) - low fairway depth and height under bridges (2.00 m and 4.00 m, respectively), insufficient dimensions of locks.
-
Oder - Spree Kanal (E 71) with regard to locks.
- upgrading from class I11 to class IV is required especially
Hungary Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Danube (E 80) joint Slovak - Hungarian section from Sap (1,810.0 km) to 1,708.2 km - low maximum draught at dry seasons (1.70 m) and height under bridges: road bridge Medved'ov (1,806.35 km) - 8.85 m; railway bridge Kom6rno (1,770.4 km) 8.10-8.15 m; road bridge Kom6rno (1,767.8 km) - 7.75 m. Upgrading to 2.50 m and 9.10 m respectively is required.
-
Danube (E 80), the section from 1,708.2 km to Budapest (1,652.0 km) - low 1.70 m) and height under the railway bridge Ujpest maximum draught (1.50 (1,654.5 km) - 7.66m. Upgrading to 2.50 m and 9.10 m respectively is required.
-
Lithuania Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: Nemunas (E 41) from Jurbarkas to Kaunas - upgrading from class 111 to class Vb is required.
Luxembourg Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks: none.
Moldova Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks:
-
Prut (E 80-07) from the mouth to Branest - upgrading to class Va is required. Nistru (E 90-03) from Ukraine/Moldova State border to Bender class 111 to class Va is required.
Stratea~cbottlenecks: none.
-
upgrading from
9
Inventory of Man Standards itnd Parameters of the E Waterway Network
Netherlands Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: Zuid-Willemsvaart up to Veghel (E 70-03)
- upgrading to class I V . ~
Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Ijssel (E 70) from Arnhem to Zutphen - upgrading to class Va is envisaged.
- Upgrading of the Zwartsluis a t Meppel-Ramspol (E 12-02) is under way.
-
Upgrading of the Lemmer-Delfzijl section (E 15) to class Va enabling at least 3-layer container transport is under way.
-
Twente Canal (E 70) - upgrading to class Va is under way and an increase of the capacity of the Eefde lock to be carried out after 2010.
-
Lekkanaal (E 11-02) - upgrading of the Beatrix lock.
-
Maas route (E 01)
-
- upgrading to class Vb enabling 4-layer container t r a n ~ p o r t . ~
E 06 waterway - increasing the capacity of the Kreekrak
lock^.^
E 03 waterway - increasing the capacity of the Volkerak locks (expected to be carried out after 2010) and Terneuzen locks.-
Poland Missina links: Danube - Oder - Elbe Connection (E 30). Basic bottlenecks:
-
Oder (E 30) from Widuchova to Kozle - upgrading from classes I 1 and I11 to class Vb is required.
- Glivice Canal (E 30-01)
- upgrading from class I11 to class Vb is required.
-
Wisla (E 40) from Biala Gora to Wloclawek and from Plock to Warszawa from classes Iand I 1 to class Vb is required.
-
-
Zeran Canal (E 40) from Zeran to Zegrze Lake - upgrading from class I11to class Vb is required.
-
Bug (E 40) from Zegrze Lake to Brest limited to 0.80 m for 210 days a year.
-
Warta - Notec - Bydgoski Canal (E 70) from Kostrzyn to Bydgoszcz - upgrading from class I 1 to class Vb is required.
upgrading
- upgrading to class Vb is required. The depth is
Project is under study and is expected to be carried out after 2006. The project is under study and is expected to be carried out in 2005-2019. 3 The realization of this project is conditional upon agreement between the Governments of the Netherlands and Belgium.
10
Inventory of Hetn Standards and Parameters ofthe E Watuway Network
-
Wisla (E 70) from Bydgoszcz to Biala Gora required.
-
-
Szkarpawa (E 70) from Gdanska Glova to Elblag - upgrading from class 111 to class Vb is required.
upgrading from class I1 to class Vb is
Strateaic bottlenecks: Oder (E 30) from Szuecin to Widuchova to class Vb is expected.
- upgrading from class IV
Romania Missina links:
-
Danube - Bucuresti Canal (E 80-05). Olt (E 80-03) up to Slatina.
Basic bottlenecks:
-
Prut (E 80-07) from the mouth to Ungheni. Bega Canal (E 80-01-02) up to Timisoara.
Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Danube (E80) from 863 to 175 km - low fairway depth at dry seasons (below 2.50 m - value recommended by the Danube Commission) at several critical sections, i.e. : from 863 to 845.5 km, with fairway depth limited to 2.20-2.30 m for 7-15 days a year; from 845.5 to 610 km, with fairway depth limited to 2.10-2.20 m for 10-15 days a year; from 610 to 375 km, with fairway depth limited to 1.80-2.00 m for 20-40 days a year; from 375 to 300 km, with fairway depth limited to 1.60-2.20 m for 30-70 days a year; from 300 to 175 km, with fairway depth limited to 1.90-2.10 m for 15-30 days a year.
-
Danube (E 80) from 170 km to the Black Sea - low fairway depth at dry seasons (below 7.30 m - value recommended by the Danube Commission) at several critical polnts, i.e. at 73, 57, 47, 41 and 37 nautical miles and at the Sulina bar at the mouth of the Sulina Canal where it meets the Black Sea, where the fairway depth is limited to 6.90-7.00 m for 10-20 days a year.
Inwntorv of Man Standards and Parametem of the E Wateruav Network
11
Russian Federation Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Don (E 90) from Kalach to Azov Lock (162.0 km).'/ Volga (E 50)
-
low water depth (3.40 m) at sill of the Kochetov
- low water depth a t sill of the Gorodetski Lock (850.0 km).3
Serbia Missina links: none Basic bottlenecks: Begej (E 80-01-02) from its mouth to the Serbian/Romanian border upgrading from class I11 to class Vb is required.
-
Strateaic bottlenecks:
-
Danube (E 80) from 863 to 845.5 k m - low fairway depth at dry seasons (below 2.50 m - value recommended by the Danube Commission) with fairway depth limited to 2.20-2.30 m for 7-15 days a year.
-
Danube (E 80) at Novi Sad (1,254.25 road/railway bridge (6.82 m).
-
Sava (E 80-12) from its mouth to the State border - upgrading to class Vb is required.
km)
-
low height under a temporary
Slovakia Missina links:
-
Danube - Oder - Elbe Connection (E 20 and E 30). V6h
- Oder Link (E 81).
Basic bottlenecks: V6h (E 81), from Sered'/Hlohovec (73.0-74.0 km) to iilina (242.0243.0 km) - insufficient fairway depth. Canalization of the river and its upgrading from class I11 to class Va in conjunction with the construction of new locks, and reconstruction of existing locks, are required. Strateaic bottlenecks:
- Danube (E 80) from Devin (1,880.26 km) to Bratislava (1,867.0 km) - upgrading from class VIb t o class VIc when going downstream. The construction of a second parallel lock is under way with a depth at sill of 4.00 m. Due to the fact that the Tcheboksary Reservoir is not filled up to the project level and that the water level of the Volga River at the Nijniy Novgomd - Gorodets section went down, the depth of 3.50 m at sill of the Gorodetski Lock is only ensured for 2-3 hours a day. Currently, the Government is considering the appropriate level for the filling of the Tcheboksary Reservoir. Thereatler, a decision will be taken on the way to improve the navigable conditions on this section.
12
Inventoly of Mam Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
- Danube (E 80) from Devin (1,880.26 km) to Devinska Nova Ves (Morava (E 30), 6.0 km) - upgrading to class Vb.
-
Danube (E 80) - insufficient height under bridges: at Bratislava (1,868.14 km) 7.59 m, at locks of the Gabtikovo Hydro Electrical Complex (1,826.55 km and 1,819.3 km) - 8.90 m. Upgrading is required up to 9.10 m.
-
Danube (E 80) from Sap (1,810.0 km) to the mouth of the Iper River (1,708.2 km) insufficient depth at low water level and insufficient height under the bridges.
- Vah (E 81) from Krarova (63.1 km) to Hlohovec (101.9 km)
- construction of Seredl-
Hlohovec hydraulic complex and reconstruction of canals and locks is required in order t o upgrade this section of the river to class VIa.
- Vah (E 81) from Komarno (0.0 km) to Selice (42.0 km) - low maximum draught (1.6 m). Navigable conditions will improve after the construction downstream on the Danube of the Gabzikovo-Nagymaros hydraulic works.
Switzerland Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks: none. Strateaic bottlenecks: none.
Ukraine Missina links: none. Basic bottlenecks:
- Desna (E 40-01) from the mouth to Chernihiv - upgrading from class I11 to class I V is required.
-
Dnestr (E 90-03) from Belgorod Dnestrovsky to Ukraine/Moldova border from class I11 to class Vb is required.
-
upgrading
Inventory of Maln Standards and Parametwsof the E Waterway Network
3.
13
COASTAL ROUTES
Coastal routes mentioned in annex Ito AGN are intended to ensure the continuity of the E waterways' network throughout Europe and, in principle, do not impose any restrictions on vessels using them. However, in the event that these coastal shipping vessels are supposed to regularly use inland waterways (mixed river-sea navigation) their dimensions should, where possible and economically viable, meet the requirements for self-propelled units suitable for navigation on inland waterways of classes Va and VIb as indicated in annex I11 of the Agreement. 4.
EXPLANATIONS OF TABLES l, 2 AND 3
The three tables reproduced below reflect data on existing and target parameters of inland waterways, locks and ports of international importance as at 1October 2005.
Table 1: Navigational Characteristics of Main Inland Waterways of International Importance Data for each section of E waterways are given in two lines: the upper line represents target values to be achieved as a result of envisaged modernization of existing waterway or construction of a new water link, while the lower one shows existing parameters. Maximum admissible length and width of vessels/convoys are separated by a slash. The draught (d) and the minimum height under bridges (H) indicated in Table 1 are given in relation to the Low Navigable Water Level (LNWL) for the draught and the Highest Navigable Water Level (HNWL) for the height under bridges. The LNWL corresponds to a long-term mean water level reached or exceeded on all but 20 ice-free days per year (approximately between 5% and 6% of the ice-free period). The HNWL corresponds to a level existing for not less than 1 % of the navigation period, established on the basis of 0 b ~ e ~ a t i 0over n ~ a substantial number of years (30 to 40 years), excluding periods when there was ice. The suitability of a particular waterway for combined transport is marked as follows: A
-
Waterways suitable for combined transport. This means that inland navigation vessels with a width of 11.40 or 11.45 m and a length of approximately 110 m are able to operate on such waterways carrying three or more layers of containers, 50% of containers being empty. Otherwise a permissible length of pushed convoys of 185 m should be possible, in which case they could operate with two layers of containers, 50% of containers being empty;
B
-
Waterways suitable for combined transport but restrictions apply. This is mainly interpreted by Governments as inland waterways allowing the transport of at least two layers of containers, 50% or less of them being empty, sometimes with the use of ballasting;
C
-
Waterways not suitable for combined transport. These are the waterways where the transport of even two layers of containers is impossible.
14
Table 2:
Inventory of Maln Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
Parameters of locks o f inland waterways of international importance
The table contains detailed data on some 600 locks, ship lifts and inclined planes situated on E waterways. This also includes data on locks which are under construction or planned. Table 3:
Technical characteristics of inland navigation ports o f international importance
This table provides data on 391 European inland navigation ports of international importance. E ports are classified in the table in accordance with their annual cargohandling capacity (0.5-3 million tons, 3-10 million tons and more than 10 million tons). The annual cargo-handling capacity should be interpreted as the potential of a particular port with regard to its existing equipment.
Table 1: Naviaational Characteristics of Main Eur00ean -a Ivs SECTION OF E WATERWAY
E wATEwAy
of
LENGTH MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OFVESSELS AND WSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHI UNDER BRIDGES"n DRAUGHT LENGTH'" WIDTH"' (km) (m) (m) (m) Im)
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANOPOW*
1
COMMENTS
10
-
Dunkerque m i n ESCAUT buchain -Con& C O N D ~ POMMEROEULCANAL ~
CCiKl&-HNbWS
-
CONDk POMMEROEULCANAL Hensies Pommemeul NlMY BLATON PERONNES CANAL pwnmecoeUl- Nimy CANAL DU CENTRE Nimy - Seneffe CHARLEROI- BRUXEUES CANAL Seneffe - Challeroi SAMBRE Charlemi Namur MEUSE Namur- W-Ramet MEUSE IW-Ramet-L @ p ALBERTKA" Li@ Lanaye CANAL DE LANAYE
-
6.1
-
-
-
Lamye Upper line - target value, Lower line - present value
" A- Suitable for combined transport.
B - Suitable, but restrictions apply. C - Not suitable fcf wmbined transpott.
" Values applicable to s~ngleuniMwnvoys. Takes into account secunty clearance of about 30 cm between the uppermost pdnt of ihe vassal's structure w hs load and a bddge.
E WATERWAY
1
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
2
LENGTH
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
(km)
LENGTH"' (m)
WIDTH"' (m)
3
4
5
I
DRAUGHT (m)
MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES (m)
6
7
CLASS I
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
10
E WATERWAY
SECTIW OF E WATERWAY
MAYJW DldENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED #HW H O W T UNOUI CONVOYS WHCH MAY BE ACCOfMCOATED
LENGTH
LENGTH'"
4
3
E 0106
K A W VAN ST. ANDRIES
E 01-03
ZUID WILLEMSVAART Maas -'S Hertogenbcsch BOUDEWIJN CANAL
E 02
WDTK" (m) S
I
(m1 6
5.W.W
I
2.30
CLASS
SUlTABlUTY FOR COWED TRAHSWRT"
CWENTS
8
9
10
BIMGES""
DRAUGHT
(m)
7
-
-
h m x e Brugge
-
GENT OOSTENDE CANAL Brugge Bwmem G E M OOSTENDE CANAL Beemem - Schipdonk LYS BYPASS CANAL Schipdonk - Deim LYS Deim Ooigem LYS Ooigem Harelbeke bck LYS Harelbekel& Halluin LYS MITOYENNE Halluin Wewik LYS MITOYENNE Belgian Commune of Canines DEOLEAND DEOLECANAL DeObrcd Quesiwy DEOLE AND DEOLECANAL QuesmylDeDle - Lille (Grand Car&) DEOLEAND DEOLE CANAL Ltlle (Grand Cad)- Bawin
-
-
-
-
-
1
700M.0
1
1
450
1
I1
I
.
I isunderwav
I
OF E WATERWAY
CUSS
SUlTABUlY FOR
COMMENTS
18
SECl"
E NATERWAY
c0"w
TRAIISPORT"
E ULUL
UElY I
- WJ IERYE bfWlU
-
Bnigge oostande E 02-02-01 PLASSENDALE - NIEUWPOORT CANAL Pbssendale Gistdbnrg PLASSENDALE - N I E W O O R T CANAL Gistelbrug - SnaaskMe PLASSENDALE - NIEUWOORT CANAL Smskerke Nieuwpwrt E 0204 ROESELARE LElE CANAL
-
L1.U
21.0
-
~
NIEUWE MERWEDE Gotinchem Moerdijk SCHELDE RlJN CONNECTION Moedqk Temeuzen GENT- TERNEUZENCANAL
-
-
GENT CIRCULAR CANAL E04
A
110.0/110.0
11.50/11.50
2.50
6.00
Va
22.5
11om85.0
zzJm2m
7m
Mb
7.80 8.70 9.10
...
vb3-
A
Vlc
32.6
ItO.WW3.O
51m
Mb
51.00 a.18
Vlb
A A A
17.1
110.0/193.0 18!iCfIaSn
2 2 . w . 8 0 23.W"l 4.w 23.00123.00 4.00 ZZWZiRl S.Sfl-12w) 22.80/22.80 5.50-12.50
Vlb
101.7
110.w185.0 1&lO.W3M.O 150.01200.0
4Ao 4.00
w
t!
%W(LW
3.50
... seawss&mute
lnventorv of Main Standards and Farametes of the E Watema
E 03
16.5
E WATERWAY
1
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
1
LENGTH
I I
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED LENGTH"'
(km)
3
1
4
1
81.6181.6
1
(m1 1
7
9
2.50
1
4.50
2@,
]
(m1
1
5
CLASS
1
6
(m1
MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES*"'
1
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
DRAUGHT
WIDTH"'
(4
I
~
i
COMMENTS
1
10
BRUELLES - SCHELDE CANAL
B~xelleS- Clabeq CHARLEROI - BRUXELLES CANAL Clabecq - Seneffe SEINE - ESCAUT LINK Compi6gne - Escaut HAUT ESCAUT Conde Bkharies HAUT ESCAUT BIBharies- Herinnes BOVENSCHELDE Herinnes - Bossuit BOVEN-SCHELDE
-
1
19.7
I
1
1 1
48.1 15.0
1
-8 85.0185.0
..& ...l... 84.N84.111 e4.7164.7
1 10.50110.50 1 I @@@a .1 1
10.30110.30
I
f
~
1
2.50
,
...l... '
10.OOHO.OO
4.75
110.01110.0
10.50H0.50
5.6
tt8jwig.q
1, 1 .!.I.@ ~ ~ 1 "
110.01110.0
11.50H1.50
30.6
IIQ.~~W@
I
~
'@&
!&i 1;3
~
...
-~
2.50
;
.
~~
6.18
,,*a
-
6.10
~-
...
. , .
g.
~~
l , ,
IV
5.80 ,
.a*
2.~0‘
...
~
2.80
.
gmg in pmgress
I
B -
501a' '1' ,.g 1New link to be built
~@
2.50
I'w.~~$W f&5@$OOS6
C
..
a&: 1' m
32.8
~
,
1
...
@16arf0@
IV
B
1 ,8' B a
# Va ~~
."a, ..::
~
~~
Va
va
~
B .
: '-
~
,
..
E WATERWAY
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
BOVEN-ZEESCHELDE ALBERTKANAAL ALBERTKANAAL
LENGTH
l MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED l
'
CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
MINIMUM
1 HEIGHT UNDER
CLASS l SUITABILITY 1 FOR
COMMENTS
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
21
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
CLASS LENGTH"'
4J.I
RoiterdamfEumpwrt.Harlelmond
I
j .
I4J.WLVY.J
125.01193.0 110.01269.5
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT*'
WIDTH"'
I
I I
LL.0WLL.OU
22.80134.20 22.80/22.80
I
I I
t.W
I
.I.uIp
4.00
I
4.001
I
VlG
I
COMMENTS
22
E WATERWAY
n
-
976.2 kin 1007.0 km
BOVEN MERWEDE 952.5 km 961.3 km
-
WAAL 867.4 kin - 952.5 km
BOVEN - RlJN 857.0 km 867.4 km
-
I
110.01269.5 110.0/193.0
22.80/22.80 22.80134.202
3.50'0
Norestrictions
Vlc
A
Inventor/ of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
961.3 kin - 976.2 km
1
CLASS
SECTION OF E WATERWAY LENGTH"'
I
..1190.0
COMBINED TRANSPORT*"
WIDTH"'
I
11.40H1.40
1
3.20
1 No restridions 1
M
I
A
I
1
COMMENTS
23
I Me (283.0 km) - Fos'svia the Rhdne - Fos Canal
SUITABILITY
Inventory of Main Standards and Parametem of the E Waterway Network
WATERWAY E
E 1002
RHINE Bale ( M i r e B~cke)- Rheinfdden SA6NE - MOSELLE LINK
17.4
:.
304.0
'
110.01110.0 110.OH10.0 ..J185.0 38.51385
11.4W11.45 11.45111.45 11.40/11AO 5.Wl5.W
2.W 6 s 2.6025 6.202s 3.00 7.00 1.@l 3.50
Va Va Vb I
A A A C
New link to be built
LENGTH"'
WIDTH"'
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
7
Mademizabn planned
Noordreekanaaland
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Watemay Network
CLASS
SECTION OF E WATERWAY NATERWAY
25
E WATERWAY
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
(km)
LENGTH"' (m)
3
4
WIDTH"' ( m !
DRAUGHT (m)
MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES'"" (m)
6
7
-
1
2
5
IKetelmeer - Zwartsluis Et3
EMS Noth Sea Papenburg DORTMUND EMS KANAL
-
-
I
-
Gmnongen Wddbnyl EEMSKANAAL Wddbrtg - DelMjl EMS Eemskanal Papenburg
-
144.01144.0
53.0
B
1
13.M)/13.00
1
5.00
1
7.W
CLASS
1 '
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
9
10
E WATERWAY
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
(km)
1
2
4
I
5
I
6
7
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
8
9
in
-
Chvaletica Pardubice ELBE DANUBE CONNECTION
-
3
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OFVESSELSAND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES" DRAUGHT LENGTH*" WIDTH"' (m) Im) (m) (m)
New link to be buR
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
IW 1
2
3
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYSWHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HflGHT UNDER BRIDGES"" DRAUGHT LENGTHWIDTH"'
(m)
(m)
Iml
(4
4
5
6
7
0.0 km -88.0km
CUSS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
E
9
10
28
E VATERWAY
I
W"
-
E2046 E21
-
-
W T R A V E , ELBE- LUBECK KANAL LWck - Lauenburg ODER Swinwjscie Szczecin ODER Szwecin Widuchova (741.6 km-704.1 km) ODER Widuchova - Mouth of the W& River" 704.1 km-617.6km
-
-
617.6 km - 542.4 km 1137.0 1156.0
/11.45 19.50
1.30 1.30
5
Mouth of the Warla River Mouth of the Nrja l u z y c ! ~River"
~
8P
C
's,
ODER
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Netwark
E30
88.0 km 124.2 km VLTAVA MBlnlk Praha (Slapy) TRAM
1
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
WATERWAY
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
(km)
LENGTH' (m)
7
A
WIDTH"' ( 4
1
1
DRAUGHT (m)
MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES"" (m)
R
7
1 CLASS
R
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
10
CJU uucn (continued) Widuehova Mouih of hNysa Luzycka Ri@ 704.1 km 542.4 km
-
-
II W
a
ODER, MWth of thB Nysa Luzycka River
E MATERWAY
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
1
2
LENGTH
(W
-
3
-
Bydgoszez Wloclawek (772.4 km 674.8 km) WlSLA VVlocbwek Plodc (674.8 km 632.8 km) WSLA Plock Warszawa (632.8 km - 520.0 km) ZERAN CANAL bran - Zegrze Lake BUG Zegtze Lake B&' MUKHOVETS Brest Kobrin DNEPROVSKO BUGSKlY KANAL Kobin - Perecub PlNA PeR3~b- Pinsk PRIPYAT Pin& - Stakhovo PRlPYAT S $ ~ O V O - M O U of ~ ~the Pripyat River DNIPRO Mwth of the Pripyat River Kyiv DNIPRO Kyiv - Kanei Hydmeledric Power Plant (GES) (856.0 km 722.0 km)
-
(ml
(4
5
6
7
1
SUITABILITY FOR C0 MBIN ED TRANSPORr'
COMMENTS
8
9
10
11.40111.40
-
llW
[email protected] 112.8 free-flowingm t b n
85.U25.0 220.0
-
61.0
B B
830183.0
lW.OIlOO.V2
-
-
(m)
4
:5DlIl
-
-
(m)
CLASS
42.0
-
-
MAXIMUM DIMENSDNS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES'" LENGTHWIDTH"' DRAUGHT
92.0 41.0
I
... 100.01100.W~
...l... 100.011W.@?
50.0
1
455.0
1
63.0 134.0
B ...l... I 100.OHOO.O 1 r B lSO.OHSO.O 85.21114.8 B 270.0i270.0 114.1H70.0
Canalii
1
5.30115.20 8.00118.00 13.231520
1
.65 .65 .65 3.65
1 No restrictions l No restrictions No restrictions
Va Va Vb
Norestrictions
M
Cahalhed
I
A
E WATERWAY
C 4u
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
I uriimu, Mnev UCD - nremencnun U
LENGTH
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER LENGTH"' WIDTH"'
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT.'
COMMENTS
I
~ D
(continued)
E4001 E 40-02
I
E 41
Kakhovka GES - Kherson (93.0 km - 28.0 km) DESNA From the mouth to Chemihiv (0.00 km 198.0 km) PlVDENNY BUH
-
IUp to Mykdaiv
KURSHSKIY ZALlV AND NEMUNAS Klaipeda - Jutbarkas NEMUNAS
138.31170.0
3.65
16.70115.20
~~
198.0
!
L&
...l...
... 190.5
.,
1
-
*
~-~
~ ,, ,,
138.31170.0
T
@
100.01100.0 -
f
i
;
.~~-
1
: -.
~
1.30
;l~# W
.~
18.00H8.00
'J@l@$Z$@
q!&! m'? .:
'
& .
...l... j"" m$fg & ;.
'
,
1
-
4.00
"
... ~
~
:
p
~
~
'
~
~
-
-
-
'8,@ 8.98
& p
'
.
-
-
,~
1 Noresbictiom I
'
,
-
,
$$~..
..*~th!
,~~ L ~ . ~ . . ~ - ~ L
' . l.W
10.00/10.00
&
~
.
A
Vb
No restrictions
-
-
111 -
-
1
~
L
~
m
-
-
,,&
I
Vb lriF .IV
Freeflowing
...
1
A Free-flowing
,
B ~
1
&
.
1 Free-flowing
WATERWAY E
1
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
13.IU
v16
A
tanaturn
15.10 11.80 11.89
Vlc Vlo Vlc
A A A
Canalized
8.W
WC
A
Canalized
SECTION OF E WATERWAY LENGTH"'
VULW
-
Rybinsk Dubna KANAL MEN1 MOSKVl Dubna - Moscow Nothern Port KANAL MEN1 MOSKVl AND MOSKVA
~ ~ 0 . u
..JWI.U
...1280.0
..JLII.W
...129.M)
1260
.mO.O
.RS.OO
42.0
..J280.0 .&%O.O
..M).oO
...l29.00
0.w 3.60 3.60 3.60 2.80
COMMENTS
Inventory of Main Standards and Pararnetelr of the E Watemay Network
W
W
g g g W
33
P
E WATERWAY
1
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
2
-
I LENGTH
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
(km)
LENGTH'" (m)
3
4
WIDTH"' (m)
1
S
DRAUGHT (m)
1
6
COMMENTS HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES""
COMBINED TRANSPORT"
9
10
Invantorq of mln Standards and Panmeten of hE W a c m a y Nctwork
ill?
35
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
E WATERWAY
LENGTH
(W
-
Kfimpen Wijk bij Duurs$de NEDER RlJN Wijk tij Duurs$de IJsselkop IJSSELI
-
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS W C H MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER LENGTH-
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORF
COMMENTS
E WATERWAY
I
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES"1 DMUGHT LENGTH*" WIDTH*iml iml lml (m)
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORT"
COMMENTS
(continued) UNEREHAVEL-WASSERSTRARE
r-r-Mouth of the Havel- Oder Wassersbab - -K
82.01125.0 82.01125.0
1
1
11.45111.45 11.45111.45
1
11.45111.45
1
I
1.2P 1.2039
1
1.80
I
I
4.20 420
1
5.25
I
IP"
I
l downstream
C C
I(When going upstream
B
When going upstream
-
Mouth ofthe Havel- Oder- Wassersbak Kos!rzynB
-
-
WARTA- N O E C BYDGOSKI CANAL BRDA
Kostrzyn- BydgWlSLA Mouth of River Brda Biala Gwa (772.5 km 886.6 km) WlSLA B~alaGora Gdanska Glova (886.6 km 931.0 km) SZKARPAWA Gdanska Glova Elblaa
-
-
-
-
-
82.01125.0
. . .. .-
E WATERWAY
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
(km)
1 E70
-N I
2
-
E 7004
I Mintellandkanal branch to Hannover- Linden
E 7006
I Mittellandkanal h n c h to Hiklesheim
E 7008
I Mittellandkanal branch to Salzgitter
Fmm km 0.0 to Westhafen Berlin
I
1
3
10.0
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES"" DRAUGHT LENGTH"' WIDTH'" (m) (m) (m) (m)
4
5
6
7
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINED TRANSPORTx
COMMENTS
8
9
10
LENGTH MAXIMUM OIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AN0 PUSHED MINIMUM CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED HEIGHT UNDER LENGTH"'
tii
worn***
CLASS
SUITABILITY FOR COMBINE0 TRANSPORT'
I itLi'OWKANALANDBRITZER
From the Briher Vehindungskanal to Oder Spree Kanal
-
-
-
SPREE ODER WASSERSTWE
E 71-04
TELTOWKANAL - OSTSTRECKE
E 71-06
DAHME - WASSERSTRASSE From 0.0 km to 8.65 km and N o b
/156.0
m.25
1.90
[
3.95
C
COMMENTS
Inventov of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Watemay Network
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
E WATERWAY
-
LE HAVRE TANCARVILLECANAL
E 80
SEINE Tanrarville Rouen SEINE Rouen - Conffant OlSE ConRans - Creil OlSE Creil Compibgne SEINE MOSELLE LINK Compibgne Reims -. Ambly-sur-Meuse - Twl
-
~
~
~
39
I
I
E WATERWAY
CLASS
SECTION OF E WATERWAY LENGTH"
-
Koblenz Bad Salzig 110.01289.5
1
22.90122.90
110.0/110.0
1
11.40122
-
0.0 km - 37.2 km
-
84.0 km 260.0 km MAlN
DANUBE 9270 R km. 727R A km
DANUBE 2328.4 km 2249.0 km
-
1 79.4
(
COMMENTS
COMBINED TRANSPORT''
WIDTH"'
RHINE Bad Salzig Maiw
SUITABILITY FOR
1
1
SECTION OF E WATERWAY
LENGTH
WATERWAY
1
LENGTH'" (m)
(km) 7
1949.2 km - 1921.0 km DANUBE 1921.0 km- 1880.3 km
-
7
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS OF VESSELS AND PUSHED CONVOYS WHICH MAY BE ACCOMMODATED
I
A
WIDTH*" (m)
I
...1275.0 40.7
..J195.0 ..J110.0 ..H95.0 ..1110.0 ../275.0 ...1195.0 ...m5.0
1 1
1 1
23.00iZ3.00 23.M3123.00 23.00135.00 23.00123.00 23.00135.00 23.00112 00 23.00iZ3.W 23.00112.00
1 1
CLASS
(m)
MINIMUM HEIGHT UNDER BRIDGES (m)
fi
7
R
3.00" 3.W"
8.00 fO.00
Vlc Vlb
A
3.0072
10.00
Vlb
A
3.00"
10.00
Vlb
A
3.0072
1
10.00
SUITABILITY
1'
COMMENTS
COMBINED TRANSPORT" ,1
m m
A
A
When going downstream. Maximum 4 bargedcargo vessels When going - upstream. Maximum 4 bsmes/camo vessels
5;a 2
10.0
million tonnes 4
CARGOHAMUYG I WL I HXIIPMEMAVALABLEFOR ACCESS " CONTAINERS" RO-RO ~
20' 5
1
40'
1
8
,, 7
8
I
Mykolaiv, sea port (Pidenny Buh, 35.0 kv)
I ,I
Neringa (Kurshinskiy Zaliv)
...
Jurbarkas (Nemunas. 126.0 km)
218.9 km)
I
I
I
I
I
3 X
Podpomzhie (Volgo-BaltijskiyWaterway, 1045.0 km) 6 Cherepovets (Volgo-Baltijskiy Waterway. 540.0 km) -
P 50-07
~ a z a n(Volga, 1313.0 km) B
PS008
Ulianovsk Nolaa. " . 1541.0 kml*
P 5049
Samara (Volga. l746.O km)'
P 5018
Saratov (Volga, 2175.0 km)^
Timber, oil products, metals, cereals, bulk cargo, Scrao
.-. X
Sankt-Petersbutg river port (Neva, 1385.
Nizhniy Novgomd r/dga, 907.0 km) 6
Cereals, smp, minerals
X
Sankt-Petersbugsea port (Neva, 1397.0 km) 6
Yaroslavl (Volga, 520.0 km)
1
9
General and bulk cargo
Chemihiv (Desna, l94.5 k r
ICaWlas
I I
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
~~
-
~- -
'
IGeneral camoes. " . timber. cereals. mal
I
General cargoes. timber, m n d o n materials,-
ore,D. .i
m
General cargoes, timber, mnstrucbon materials, mal
X X
I
W m l cargoes, timber, mnstrudion materials,
I
General cargoes, timber, mhstruction materials, feltilisers
I
General cargoes, timber, mnstrudion materials, I m a L
.
General cargoes, timber, mnsbuction materials,
I
General c . mal, cerea
LAPAL1I T
r -
I P
Volgograd (Volga, 2W.O k~
P
Asbabn (Volga. 3051.0 k~
P
Moskva Northern Port (Kanal imeni Moskvi, 42.0 km) 6
P
MoskvaWestem Pwt (Kanalimeni Wvi.32.0
P
Moskva Southem Port (Kanal imeni Moskw, 0.0
-
P 5002-0201 Tver (Volga, 270.0 km) 6 P 5001-01
Perm (Kama, 2269.0 km) 6
P 6001
Scheveningen (North Sea)
P 6002
Den Helder (North Sea)
P 6003 P 6044
Brunsbimel (Kiel Canal, 2.0 5.0 k
P 6005
Kiel (Kiel Canal, 96.0 km)
P 6006
Flensburg
P 6007
Wismar
-
Rendsburg (Kiel Canal, 62.0 km)
P 6008
Rostock
PWOQ
Stralsund
P6C-10
Greifswald
P6011
Sventoji ( B a k Sea)
0.5-3.0 million tonnes
3.010.0 million tonnes
ANU LUMMtN l D
> 10.0 million tonnes
CONTAINERS " R&RO 20'
1
*k
kk
40' 8
9
l
General cargoes, limber, consbudion materials. coal
..
...
....
-. - .-- .- -
............. CAPACITY
0.5-3.0
3.0-10.0
million tonnes
million tonnes
^
I
.
> 10.0
million tonnes
20'
.
010.111
'
..,
qante (Loire, 645.0 km)
X
...
- ~a~(Waddenree)
.
I
. ... X
X
p -
-
1 1
jardoura (Doum, 49.0 km)
i8gua-Lamego @pum, 101.
.-
.......................... AND COMMENTS
EWPENrAVAWBLEFOR A& ** CONTAINERS 1' RO.RO *S
40' -
1
.
*
a
.-
...
...
...
... ...
X
X
Rapasaaff (52.0 kmirom the mouth of Saimaa Ganal) loutseno' (67.0 km from the mouth of Sa~maaCa~all Iuoksr (85.0 km from the mouth ofSaimaa Canal X
Varkaus (Port ofAkonniemiM270.0 km from
P6101
Anklam (Peene, 95.0 km)
limber
-
Varkaus (Port of Kosulannlem~') (270 0 km from the mouth of Salmaa Canal)
1
1
X
7
2
,
BL
X
Kaukas' 152.0 km
Varkaus (Port of Taipak) (270.0 km from the mouth of Saimaa Canal)
l
l Timber
f.
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACIN 0530 million tonnes
1
2
- ..
90-100 >10.0 m~U~on mill~on tonnes tonnes
3
4
CARGDHANDUElG RAL WU)MENTAVNLABLEFOR ACCESS CONTAINERS" R 0 . B
20'
1
5
1
40' 6
nm,
Braunschwe'iune* [MittellsndIcanalIcanal223.0 l HaldenslebenIMittellandkanal.301.0 knr) Brandenburg' (Untere Havel-Wasserslrab. 60.0 km)
Iclenburg (Unlere HawCWasserstnb, 57.0 km) Spsndau S W Harbur (Untere H a v ~ ~ ~ r s t r2.0 a bkr , ElMag (Zalew Wislany) Ka~dngnrdsea port (P I~708141
Gouda lH&nds IJmI. 1.4knI
P 70-03-01
Henselo (Twentekanaal.45.1 km'
-
8
9
M
Hannover (MMellandkanal, 155.0-159.0 km)
Mehrum' (Mittellandkanal. 194.0 Braunschweig (Miltellandkanal,
.
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
-
7
1
E PORTS
CARGOHANDLING CAPACIN 0.53.0 mllllon
3.0-10.0 mllllon
mlllion
tonnes
tonnes
tonnes
I
CARG0tlA"G WL HWIIPMEMAVM WFOR ACCESS *I CONTfJNERS RO-RO ~
10.0
20'
1
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
n
40'
9
bnabtck (Stichkanal. 13.0 I lanmr-Linden (Slichkanal, lildesheim(Sbchkanal, 15.0 I &t$r
,
(Stichkanal, 15.0 km)
ago-Handling Complex' (branch of the Spree at 0.0 kin)
I m X
I
1
-
1
-
1
-
I
-
I
.
1
-
1
lonnendamm (Spree, 2 0 km) leuter Power Station' (Spree. 3.0 km) :hafbttenburg P m W o n (Spree, 8.0 ki Vesthafen Berlin (Westhafenkanal, 3.0 kin) -fen
Berlin(Spree, 21.0 km)
P 70-1047
KlingenbergHeating Station (Spree, 25.0 km)
P 71-01
TeltowkanalCargo-Handling Point' (Teltowkanal, 31.0-34.0 km)
P 71-02-01
Potsdam (Potsdamer Havel, 3.0 kin)
'I
-_
__
II
I
I
I
I
I
I - I - I - 1 x 1
X
4
P 710801mlederlehme* (DahmeWasserSbaBe, 8.0 km) P 71-0E-02
K6nigs Wustehausen (OahmeWasserstraRe, 8.0 km)
x
-
1
x
1
I
X X
X
I
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACITY 3.0.10.0
0.53.0
million tonnes 2
1
> 10.0
million tonnes 3
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
CARGO HANWNG EWIWENTAVALABLEFOR CONTAINERS RO-R0
million tonnes 4
UI'
1
5
1
W
40' 6
7
8
9 UII pmaum, Nels, n
Rouen (Seine. 242.0 km)
Oil, cereals, sand,U
ConRant (Seine, 239.0 km)
...
X
Frouard (Moselle, 348.5 km Meh (Moselle, 297.WB4.0km)
a
.
.". ,..
.,
...
...
.,.
...
... .%.
Mandelange-Richemont(Moselle, 279.52 Thionville-lllanae 271.9-270.1kr - (Moselle. . Wrl (Moselle, 208.0km) Trier (Moselle, 1W.0 km)
j - I " I
X
X
Bingen (Rhine, 527.0km)
I
Wiesbaden (Rhine. 500 0 km)
11
- ' -
Maim (Rhine. 500.0km) Fiorsheim' (Main, 9.0km) Raunheim* (Main, 14.0km)
X
P
-
P
-
I
1 I
-
Frankfur? (Main. 22.0 29.0 km)
-
-
Hanau (Main, 58.0 80.0 kn Gmsskohenburg' (Main, 62.0km)
Stc&sladt (Main, 82.0 km) Aschaffenburg (Ma~n,83.0 Triefen&in*(Mah, 173.0 km)
-.
,
-
1
~
-
l
.
'
- 1
1
-
Hattersheim' (Main. 17.0km1
Fmkfurl(Main, 31.0 37.0 kn ORenbach . . .-.(Main. \ - , 40.0 - - km\,
~
l
"
'
I
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
~
x
~
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACITY 0.13.0
> 10.0
3.0-10.0
million tonnes
million tonnes
million tonnes
CARGO HANDLING WL EQUIPMENTAVAILABLE FOR ACCESS *. CONTAINERS " RO-RO 20'
1
40'
..
R
1
Schweinfult (Main. 330 0 km)
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
1
x
1
I
Bamberg (Main-Donau-ffinal, 3 0 km) Erlangen (Ma~n-Donau-Kanal.46.0 km) Niimberg (Main-Donau-ffinal, 72.0 km) Regensburg (Danube, 2370.0-2378.0 km) Deggendorf' (Danube, 2281.02284.0 k r ' Linz (Danube. 2128.2 - 2130.6 km)
All cargoes
Linz-Vhst* (Danube, 2127.2 km)
Metallurgicalpmdi
Enns-Ennsdorf (Danube, 2"'
General and bulk
Krems (Danube, 998.0 km
All cargoes but oil and oil pmducts
Wien (Danube, 1916 8-1920.2 km)
X
X
Bratislava (Danube. 1867.0 km)
IL
X
Gyor-Gdnyii (Danube, 1807.0 km)
...
...
KmPmo (Danube, 1767.1 km)
Allcargoes Ma~nlybulk cargoes and oil pmducts
X
$tirmvo (Danube. 1722.0 km) Budapest (Danube, 1610.0 km) SAzhalombatta (Danube, 1618.7 km)
1
.,.
.,.
I
...
,-
Dunafijldvar (Danube. 1563.0 km) Baja (Danube, 1480.0 km) Apatin (Danube, 1401.5 b..,
Oil pmd~cts
Mainly bulk cargo
Dunaujvams (Danube, 1579.0 k m \ X
l~quid
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACIN
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
I P 80-47
Vukovar (Danube, 1333.1 km)
P 8047bis
BadM ~aianka(Danube, 1295.0
P 80-47ter
Non Sad (Danube, 1253 5 km)
P 8048 P 8048bis
Beograd (Danube, 1170.0 km)
P m P 80-50
SmeQmvo (Danube, 1111Mkm
P 80-51 P 80-52
Tumu Severin (Dambe, 931.0 b Prahovo (Danube. 861.0 kcn)
Pankvo (Danube, 1152.8 km)
X
L
Orsova (Danube, 954.0 km)
I...I,.I...I...I...I...I...I
P8053
P 80-54
Tumu Magurele (Danube, 597.0 km)
P 80-5' P BOY
Svistov (Danube,554.0 km)
X
I
X
1
Roussse (Danube, 495.0 kml (5iurgiu (Danube, 493.0 L Ollenita (Danube. 430.0 km) Calarasi(Danube, 370.5 km)
-UllO1131UEa-
Cemavoda (Danube, 298 0 km)T
Bralh (Danube, 468.5-1720 km Galati (Danube, 76.0 Mm-160.0 krnl Gu:iurgiulesti (Danube, 133.0 km) I (Danube, 128.0 km)
I
ea (Danube. 34.0 Mm420 I
lera and bulk cargo, oll products
CAPACITY
P 800401
0.53.0
3.040.0
> 10.0
million tonnes “ 1
million tonnes . 1
million tonnes
Bonneuil-Vigneux (Seine, 169.7 k
20’
I
It
40’ n
l x l x l x l x l x
AutMlomous port of Paris:
Gennevillii (Seine, 194.7 km)
.
AND COMMENTS
MUIPMENTAVAILABLEFOR ACCESS .I CONTANERS RO.RO
I
gricuhre pmducts, fuels, mnsbucticnmaterials
I
Evfy (Seine, 137.8 km)
Melun (Seine, 110.0 km) LimayPorcheville(sine. 1W.O kmi Montereau (Seine, 67.4 km) Nantem (Seine,39.4 km) BruyBres-sur-Oise(Oise, 96.9 km) St Ouen4Aumdne(Oise, 119.2 km) I
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACITY 0.53.0 million tonnes
3.0-10.0 million tonnes
> 10.0 million tonnes
2
3
4
CARGOHANWNG Wl EWIPMENIAVAUABLE FOR ACCESS M CONTAINERSe* RO-RO
20' S
1
40' 1 6
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS AND COMMENTS
lit
8
7
9
K o m h o (Vah, 0.0 km)
-
h a wBh, 54.4 54.8
-
Sered (Vah. 73.8 74.3 km)
-H
-
P
(VBh, 124.4- 124.7 kn
-
PieHany (VAh, 124.4 124.7 km,
-
N o 6 mesto nad VBhom (VBh, 137.4 137.7 h TrenEin (Vah, 158.5-159 0 km) Dubnica (V&, 168.1-1685 km) Wchov (Vih, 192.9 193.4 km)
Pov&ki Bystrica (v&, 210.82112 h tilina (VBh, 242.0-243.0 km)
X
h v (Don, 3168.0 km)
''
(h3134.0 , km)
-
t-Donetsk (Don, 2987.0 km)
"
X
X
I
X
General cargoes, timber, wnsbuclion materials, ore, dross
General cargoes, Umber, mnstrucllonmalerid 1d,dross,
1l5
General cargoes, timber, mnstnlrlinn materials, coal,we
E PORTS
CARGO HANDLING CAPACITY 0.5-3.0 3.010.0 minion mitlion tonnes tonnes 2 1
1
P 91-01
Milano Termin (Milanc-Po Canal, 0.0 km)
...
Lodi (Milanc-Po
...
10.0
million
CARGOHANDLING RblL EQLIIFWNTAVNABLEFOR ACCESS . t CONTAINERS ** RORO
tonnes
...
20'
I
5
1
...
I.
40'
...
1
R
...
...
...
...
...
Paighetone (Milano-Po Canal, 40.0 km fmm Milano Terminal+
P 91-04
Cremona (Milanc-Po Canal, 55.0 km fmm Milano Terminals
P 91-05
Emilia Cenlrale (Milanc-Po Canal, 120.0 km fmm Milano .
P 91-06
Ferrara (PO, 200.0 km fmm Milam Terminale)
P 91-07
Adria (Veneta Lateral Waterway, 265.0 km fmm Milano Terminale)
P 81-08
Choggia (veneta Lateral Watemay, 285.0 km hwn Milano Terminale)
P 9109
Marghera (Veneta Lateral Waterway, 3W.O km from Milano Terminale)
P91-10
Noearn (veneta Lateral Waterway, 355.0 km fmm Milano Terminale) Monfalwne (veneta Late
-
1:: ...
...
-
1:
... ...
...
...
... ...
"'
...
"'
I I
"'
"'
... ... ...
_..
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS ANDCOMMENTS
...
9
Under construction or planned
I
CARGOHANDLING
1
CARGOHANDLING
I
RAIL
I
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
82
E PORTS
(Tidno, 98.0 km fmm Conca dl (
91-0104
Rovigo (FiuemTartamCanalbianw Waterway, 140.0 km)
Conca di Voila Grimana
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network
TattamCanalbianm Waterway,,O,O,km),
After the construction of a new link Gent-Zeebrugge (E 07). The secretariat has been informed by the Government of France that the port does not exist. This port is not mentionned in the AGN Agreement. Distances to ports on the River Elbe are measured: in Germany from the Czech/German State border; in the Czech Republic - from the junction of the rivers Elbe and Vltava at Mglnik. The port of Warszawa is not equipped for cargo handling. The Polish Government proposes, therefore, to delete it from the Blue book and fmm the AGN Agreement. Distance from Moskva Southern Port. I n the AGN Agreement this port is mentioned as P 80-14-01. I n the AGN Agreement this port is mentioned as P 80-14-03. New port to be built.
-
'
This page intentionally left blank
Inventory of Main Standards and Parameter or the E Waterway Network
SCHEME OF THE NETWORK OF INLAND WATERWAYS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE I n conformity with Annex Iof the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN)
87
