Wireless Communications over MIMO Channels

Wireless Communications over MIMO Channels

Wireless Communications over MIMO Channels Applications to CDMA and Multiple Antenna Systems

Volker Kuhn ¨ Universit¨at Rostock, Germany

Copyright  2006

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) 1243 779777

Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (+44) 1243 770620. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The Publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Other Wiley Editorial Offices John Wiley & Sons Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA Jossey-Bass, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741, USA Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Boschstr. 12, D-69469 Weinheim, Germany John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd, 42 McDougall Street, Milton, Queensland 4064, Australia John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2 Clementi Loop #02-01, Jin Xing Distripark, Singapore 129809 John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd, 6045 Freemont Blvd, Mississauga, ONT, L5R 4J3, Canada Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN-13 978-0-470-02716-5 (HB) ISBN-10 0-470-02716-9 (HB) Typeset in 10/12pt Times by Laserwords Private Limited, Chennai, India. Printed and bound in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, England. This book is printed on acid-free paper responsibly manufactured from sustainable forestry in which at least two trees are planted for each one used for paper production.

Contents Preface

xi

Acknowledgements

xv

List of Abbreviations

xvii

List of Symbols

xxi

1 Introduction to Digital Communications 1.1 Basic System Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1.2 Multiple Access Techniques . . . . . . . . . 1.1.3 Principle Structure of SISO Systems . . . . 1.2 Characteristics of Mobile Radio Channels . . . . . . 1.2.1 Equivalent Baseband Representation . . . . 1.2.2 Additive White Gaussian Noise . . . . . . . 1.2.3 Frequency-Selective Time-Variant Fading . . 1.2.4 Systems with Multiple Inputs and Outputs . 1.3 Signal Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.1 Optimal Decision Criteria . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.2 Error Probability for AWGN Channel . . . . 1.3.3 Error and Outage Probability for Flat Fading 1.3.4 Time-Discrete Matched Filter . . . . . . . . 1.4 Digital Linear Modulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4.2 Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK) . . . . . . . 1.4.3 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) . 1.4.4 Phase Shift Keying (PSK) . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.1 General Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.2 MRC for Independent Diversity Branches . 1.5.3 MRC for Correlated Diversity Branches . . 1.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 1 1 3 5 8 8 11 12 16 18 18 20 22 25 27 27 28 30 33 36 36 40 47 49

vi 2 Information Theory 2.1 Basic Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1.1 Information, Redundancy, and Entropy . . . . . 2.1.2 Conditional, Joint and Mutual Information . . . 2.1.3 Extension for Continuous Signals . . . . . . . . 2.1.4 Extension for Vectors and Matrices . . . . . . . 2.2 Channel Coding Theorem for SISO Channels . . . . . . 2.2.1 Channel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.2 Cutoff Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.3 Gallager Exponent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.4 Capacity of the AWGN Channel . . . . . . . . 2.2.5 Capacity of Fading Channel . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.6 Channel Capacity and Diversity . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Channel Capacity of MIMO Systems . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Channel Capacity for Multiuser Communications . . . . 2.4.1 Single Antenna AWGN Channel . . . . . . . . 2.4.2 Single Antenna Flat Fading Channel . . . . . . 2.4.3 Multiple Antennas at Transmitter and Receiver . 2.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51 51 51 53 56 57 58 58 59 62 64 68 70 73 78 78 82 85 89

3 Forward Error Correction Coding 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Linear Block Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.1 Description by Matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.2 Simple Parity Check and Repetition Codes . . . . 3.2.3 Hamming and Simplex Codes . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4 Hadamard Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.5 Trellis Representation of Linear Block Codes . . 3.3 Convolutional Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.1 Structure of Encoder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.2 Graphical Description of Convolutional Codes . . 3.3.3 Puncturing Convolutional Codes . . . . . . . . . 3.3.4 ML Decoding with Viterbi Algorithm . . . . . . . 3.4 Soft-Output Decoding of Binary Codes . . . . . . . . . . 3.4.1 Log-Likelihood Ratios – A Measure of Reliability 3.4.2 General Approach for Soft-Output Decoding . . . 3.4.3 Soft-Output Decoding for Walsh Codes . . . . . . 3.4.4 BCJR Algorithm for Binary Block Codes . . . . 3.4.5 BCJR Algorithm for Binary Convolutional Codes 3.4.6 Implementation in Logarithmic Domain . . . . . 3.5 Performance Evaluation of Linear Codes . . . . . . . . . 3.5.1 Distance Properties of Codes . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5.2 Error Rate Performance of Codes . . . . . . . . . 3.5.3 Information Processing Characteristic . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91 92 94 94 97 98 99 99 100 101 104 105 106 109 109 112 114 115 118 120 121 121 125 131

CONTENTS 3.6

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . .

135 135 137 141 146 153 160 160 165 167 169 171

4 Code Division Multiple Access 4.1 Fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.1 Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum . . . . . . . . . 4.1.2 Direct-Sequence CDMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1.3 Single-User Matched Filter (SUMF) . . . . . . . 4.1.4 Spreading Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 OFDM-CDMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.1 Multicarrier Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.2 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing . . . 4.2.3 Combining OFDM and CDMA . . . . . . . . . . 4.3 Low-Rate Channel Coding in CDMA Systems . . . . . . 4.3.1 Conventional Coding Scheme (CCS) . . . . . . . 4.3.2 Code-Spread Scheme (CSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3.3 Serially Concatenated Coding Scheme (SCCS) . . 4.3.4 Parallel Concatenated Coding Scheme (PCCS) . . 4.3.5 Influence of MUI on Coding Schemes . . . . . . 4.4 Uplink Capacity of CDMA Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.1 Orthogonal Spreading Codes . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.2 Random Spreading Codes and Optimum Receiver 4.4.3 Random Spreading Codes and Linear Receivers . 4.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173 174 174 181 185 191 194 194 195 200 208 209 210 211 214 216 219 220 220 222 225

5 Multiuser Detection in CDMA Systems 5.1 Optimum Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.1 Optimum Joint Sequence Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Joint Preprocessing and Subsequent Separate Decoding . . . . . . 5.1.3 Turbo Detection with Joint Preprocessing and Separate Decoding . 5.2 Linear Multiuser Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2.1 Decorrelator (Zero-Forcing, ZF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2.2 Minimum Mean Squared Error Receiver (MMSE) . . . . . . . . . 5.2.3 Linear Parallel Interference Cancellation (PIC) . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2.4 Linear Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

227 227 228 229 231 233 233 236 240 243

3.7

3.8

Concatenated Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.6.2 Performance Analysis for Serial Concatenation . 3.6.3 Performance Analysis for Parallel Concatenation 3.6.4 Turbo Decoding of Concatenated Codes . . . . 3.6.5 EXIT Charts Analysis of Turbo Decoding . . . Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) Codes . . . . . . . 3.7.1 Basic Definitions and Encoding . . . . . . . . . 3.7.2 Graphical Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.7.3 Decoding of LDPC Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.7.4 Performance of LDPC Codes . . . . . . . . . . Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

vii

viii

CONTENTS 5.3

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

245 245 247 253 258 258 258 268 270 273

6 Multiple Antenna Systems 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2 Spatial Diversity Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2.1 Receive Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2.2 Performance Analysis of Space–Time Codes . . . . . 6.2.3 Orthogonal Space–Time Block Codes . . . . . . . . . 6.2.4 Space–Time Trellis Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3 Multilayer Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3.1 Channel Knowledge at the Transmitter and Receiver 6.3.2 Channel Knowledge only at the Receiver . . . . . . . 6.3.3 Performance of Multilayer Detection Schemes . . . . 6.3.4 Lattice Reduction-Aided Detection . . . . . . . . . . 6.4 Linear Dispersion Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.4.1 LD Description of Alamouti’s Scheme . . . . . . . . 6.4.2 LD Description of Multilayer Transmissions . . . . . 6.4.3 LD Description of Beamforming . . . . . . . . . . . 6.4.4 Optimizing Linear Dispersion Codes . . . . . . . . . 6.4.5 Detection of Linear Dispersion Codes . . . . . . . . . 6.5 Information Theoretic Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5.1 Uncorrelated MIMO Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5.2 Correlated MIMO Channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275 275 277 277 279 282 293 304 304 306 308 312 319 320 321 321 322 323 323 323 325 328

Appendix A Channel Models A.1 Equivalent Baseband Representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.2 Typical Propagation Profiles for Outdoor Mobile Radio Channels . . . . . . A.3 Moment-Generating Function for Ricean Fading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

329 329 330 331

5.4

5.5

Nonlinear Iterative Multiuser Detection . . . . . . . . 5.3.1 Nonlinear Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3.2 Uncoded Nonlinear Interference Cancellation . 5.3.3 Nonlinear Coded Interference Cancellation . . Combining Linear MUD and Nonlinear SIC . . . . . 5.4.1 BLAST-like Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4.2 QL Decomposition for Zero-Forcing Solution 5.4.3 QL Decomposition for MMSE Solution . . . 5.4.4 Turbo Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

Appendix B Derivations for Information Theory 333 B.1 Chain Rule for Entropies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 B.2 Chain Rule for Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 B.3 Data-Processing Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 Appendix C Linear Algebra 335 C.1 Selected Basics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335

CONTENTS

ix

C.2 Householder Reflections and Givens Rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 C.3 LLL Lattice Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 Bibliography

347

Index

359

Preface Motivation Mobile radio communications are evolving from pure telephony systems to multimedia platforms offering a variety of services ranging from simple file transfers and audio and video streaming, to interactive applications and positioning tasks. Naturally, these services have different constraints concerning data rate, delay, and reliability (quality-of-service (QoS)). Hence, future mobile radio systems have to provide a large flexibility and scalability to match these heterogeneous requirements. Additionally, bandwidth has become an extremely valuable resource emphasizing the need for transmission schemes with high spectral efficiency. To cope with these challenges, three key areas have been the focus of research in the last decade and are addressed in this book: Code division multiple access (CDMA), multiple antenna systems, and strong error control coding. CDMA was chosen as a multiple access scheme in third generation mobile radio systems such as the universal mobile telecommunication system (UMTS) and CDMA 2000. The main ingredient of CDMA systems is the inherent spectral spreading that allows a certain coexistence with narrow band systems. Owing to the large bandwidth, it generally provides a higher diversity degree and thus a better link reliability. Compared to second generation mobile radio systems, the third generation offers increased flexibility like different and much higher data rates as required for the large variety of services. The frequency reuse factor in such cellular networks allows neighboring cells to operate at the same frequency, leading to a more efficient use of the resource frequency. Moreover, this allows simpler soft handover compared to the ‘break before make’ strategy in global system for mobile communication (GSM) when mobile subscribers change the serving cell. The main drawback of CDMA systems is the multiuser interference requiring appropriate detection algorithms at the receiver. Multiple antenna systems represent the second major research area. Owing to their high potential in improving the system efficiency they have already found their way into several standards. On one hand, multiple antennas at the receiver and transmitter allow the transmission of several spatially separated data streams. For point-to-point communications, this is termed space division multiplexing (SDM), and in multiuser scenarios, it is called space division multiple access (SDMA). In both the scenarios, the system’s spectral efficiency can be remarkably increased compared to the single antenna case. On the other hand, the link reliability can be improved by beamforming and diverse techniques. As a third research area, powerful channel coding like concatenated codes or low-density parity check codes allows efficient communications in the vicinity of Shannon’s channel

xii

PREFACE

capacity. This leads to a power-efficient transmission that is of particular interest concerning the battery lifetime in mobile equipment and the discussion about the electromagnetic exposition. Certainly, all mentioned areas have to be jointly considered and should be incorporated into third generation mobile radio systems and beyond. Owing to the influence of the mobile radio channel, a power- and bandwidth-efficient transmission can be obtained only with appropriate signal processing either at the transmitter or the receiver. Assuming channel knowledge at the transmitter, a preequalization of the channel-like Tomlinson-Harashima Precoding allows very simple receiver structures. Derivatives are also applicable in multiuser downlink scenarios where a common base station can coordinate all transmissions and avoid interference prior to transmission. Even without channel knowledge at the transmitter, space–time coding schemes allow the full exploitation of diversity for multiple transmit antennas and flat fading channels with a simple matched filter at the receiver. All these techniques require joint preprocessing at a common transmitter, that is, a coordinated transmission has to be implemented and provide the advantage of a very simple receiver structure. On the contrary, the generally asynchronous multiuser uplink consists of spatially separated noncooperating transmitters and a common powerful base station. In this scenario, a joint preprocessing is not possible and the receiver has to take over the part of jointly processing the signals. The same situation occurs when multiple antennas are used for spatial multiplexing without channel knowledge at the transmitter. At first sight, such a multiple antenna system seems to be quite different from the CDMA uplink. However, the mathematical description using vector notation illustrates their similarity. Hence, the common task of receivers in both cases is to separate and recover the interfering signals so that the same detection algorithms can be used. The aim of this book is to explain the principles and main advances of the three research areas mentioned above. Moreover, the similarity between the SDM and the CDMA uplink is illustrated. Therefore, a unified description using vector notations and comprising multiple antenna as well as CDMA systems is presented. This model can be generalized to arbitrary vector channels, that is, channels with multiple inputs and outputs. It is used to derive efficient detection algorithms whose error rate performances are compared.

Structure of Book Chapter 1: Introduction to Digital Communications The book starts with an introduction to digital communication systems. Since the mobile radio channel dominates the design of these systems, its statistical properties are analyzed and appropriate models for frequency selective channels with single as well as multiple inputs and outputs are presented. Afterwards, the basic principles of signal detection and some general expressions for the error rate performance are derived. These results are used in the next section to determine the performance of linear modulation schemes for different channel models. Finally, the principle of diversity is generally discussed and the effects are illustrated with numerical results. They are used in subsequent chapters in which frequency diversity in CDMA systems and space diversity in multiple antenna systems are explained.

PREFACE

xiii

Chapter 2: Information Theory Chapter 2 deals with the information theoretical analysis of mobile radio systems. Starting with some basic definitions, capacities of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel and fading channels are derived. In particular, the difference between ergodic and outage capacity is discussed. The next section derives the capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems in a general way without delivering specific results. They are presented for CDMA and SDMA systems in Chapters 4 and 6. The chapter closes with a short summary on theoretic survey of multiuser communications.

Chapter 3: Forward Error Correction Coding The third chapter gives a short survey of selected channel coding topics that become relevant in subsequent chapters. Starting with a basic description of linear block and convolutional codes, soft-output decoding algorithms representing an essential ingredient in concatenated coding schemes are derived. Next, low-density parity check codes are briefly explained and the general performance of codes is evaluated. On one hand, the error rate performance is analyzed by the union bound technique, exploiting the distance properties of codes. On the other hand, the information processing characteristic is based on information theory and allows a comparison with ideal coding schemes. Finally, concatenated codes are considered, including turbo decoding whose analysis is based on EXtrinsic information transfer (EXIT) charts.

Chapter 4: Code Division Multiple Access The multiple access scheme CDMA is described in Chapter 4. Besides single-carrier CDMA with the Rake receiver, multicarrier CDMA with different despreading or equalization techniques is also considered. Moreover, the basic differences between uplink and downlink are explained and some examples for spreading sequences are presented. Next, the high performance of low rate coding, exploiting the inherent spreading in CDMA systems is demonstrated. The chapter ends with an information theoretical analysis of the CDMA uplink with random spreading by picking up the general results from Chapter 2.

Chapter 5: Multiuser Detection in CDMA Systems While the fourth chapter is mainly restricted to single-user matched filters, Chapter 5 considers multiuser detection strategies for the CDMA uplink. After sketching the optimum detectors, low-cost linear detectors as well as nonlinear multistage detectors including turbo processing with channel decoding are derived. The chapter closes with a discussion on the combination of linear preprocessing and nonlinear interference cancellation based on the QL decomposition of the mixing matrix.

Chapter 6: Multiple Antenna Systems Chapter 6 covers several topics related to point-to-point communications with multiple antennas. It starts with diversity concepts such as receive diversity and space-time coding. Next, the principle of spatial multiplexing is explained. Besides the detection algorithms

xiv

PREFACE

already described in Chapter 5, a new approach based on the lattice reduction is presented showing a performance that is close to the optimum maximum likelihood detector. A unified description is provided by the linear dispersion codes addressed in Section 6.4. Finally, a brief information theoretical analysis of multiple antenna systems is presented.

Appendices In Appendix A, some basic derivations concerning the equivalent baseband representation and the moment generating function of Rice fading are presented. Furthermore, it contains tables with frequently used channel models. Appendix B proves the chain rules for entropy and information, as well as the data processing theorem. Finally, Appendix C presents some basics of linear algebra, Householder reflection, and Givens rotation, as well as the Lenstra, Lenstra and Lov´asz (LLL) algorithm for the lattice reduction used in Chapter 6.

Notational Remarks In order to avoid confusion, some notational remarks should be made. Real and imaginary parts of a signal x(t) are denoted by x
(t) and x

(t), respectively. To distinguish timecontinuous signals and their sampled time-discrete versions, square brackets are used in the time-discrete case leading to x[k] = x(kTs ) with Ts as sampling interval. Moreover, X represents a stochastic process while x[k] represents a corresponding sampling function. Hence, probability mass functions of continuous processes are denoted by pX (x). The conditional probability mass function pX|d (x) considers the process X , given a fixed hypothesis d so that it is a function of only a single variable x. Multivariate processes comprising several random variables X1 · · · Xn are denoted by X . Column vectors, row vectors, and matrices are distinguished by x, x, and X, respectively. A set X contains all the possible values a signal x[k] can take, that is, x[k] ∈ X holds. It can be either an infinite set like Z, R, or C, representing the sets of all integers, real numbers, or complex numbers, respectively, or a finite set like X consisting generally of N symbols {X0 , . . . , XN−1 }. Finally, log denotes the natural logarithm while other bases are explicitly mentioned.

Acknowledgements This book was written during my time at the Department of Communications Engineering at the University of Bremen and basically comprises the results of my research. Certainly, it could not have been written without the support and patience of many people. Therefore, I am obliged to everyone who assisted me during that time. In particular, I am obliged to Professor Kammeyer for all the valuable advice, encouragement, and discussions. The opportunity to work in his department was a precious experience. I would also like to acknowledge the proofreading by Ralf Seeger, Sven Vogeler, Peter Klenner, Petra Weitkemper, Ansgar Scherb, J¨urgen Rinas, and Martin Feuers¨anger. Special thanks are due to Dirk W¨ubben and Ronald B¨ohnke for my fruitful discussions with them and their valuable hints. Of great benefit was also the joint work with Armin Dekorsy in the area of low rate coding for CDMA. Finally, I would like to thank my wife Claudia and my children Erik and Jana for their infinite patience and trust.

Volker K¨uhn Bremen, Germany

List of Abbreviations 3GPP

Third Generation Project Partnership

ARQ ASK AWGN

Automatic Repeat on Request Amplitude Shift Keying Additive White Gaussian Noise

BCJR BER BLAST BPSK BSC

Bahl, Cocke, Jelinek, Raviv Bit Error Rate Bell Labs Layered Space Time Binary Phase Shift Keying Binary Symmetric Channel

CCS CDMA COST CSI CSS

Conventional Coding Scheme Code Division Multiple Access European Cooperation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research Channel State Information Code-Spread System

DAB D-BLAST DFT DMT DS-CDMA DSL DVB

Digital Audio Broadcast Diagonal BLAST Discrete Fourier Transform Discrete Multi-Tone Direct-Sequence CDMA Digital Subscriber Line Digital Video Broadcast

EGC EXIT

Equal Gain Combining EXtrinsic Information Transfer

FDD FDMA FEC FER FFT

Frequency Division Duplex Frequency Division Multiple Access Forward Error Correction Frame Error Rate Fast Fourier Transform

xviii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

FHT FIR

Fast Hadamard Transform Finite Impulse Response

GF GSM

Galois Field Global System for Mobile communications

HSDPA

High Speed Downlink Packet Access

ICI IDFT IEEE IFFT i.i.d. IIR IOWEF IPC ISI

Inter-Carrier Interference Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Inverse Fast Fourier Transform independent identically distributed Infinite Impulse Response Input Output Weight Enumerating Function Information Processing Characteristic InterSymbol Interference

LD LDPC LLL LLR LoS LR LSB

Linear Dispersion Low-Density Parity Check Lenstra, Lenstra and Lov´asz Log-Likelihood Ratio Line of Sight Lattice Reduction Least Significant Bit

MAI MAP MC MF MGF MIMO MISO ML MLD MMSE MRC MSB MUD MUI

Multiple Access Interference Maximum A Posteriori Multi-Carrier Matched Filter Moment-Generating Function Multiple Input Multiple Output Multiple Input Single Output Maximum Likelihood Maximum Likelihood Decoding Minimum Mean Square Error Maximum Ratio Combining Most Significant Bit Multi-User Detection Multi-User Interference

NSC

Nonrecursive Nonsystematic Convolutional

OFDM ORC

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Orthogonal Restoring Combining

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS PAM PCCS PIC PSA PSK

Pulse Amplitude Modulation Parallel Concatenated Coding Scheme Parallel Interference Cancellation Post-Sorting Algorithm Phase Shift Keying

QAM QLD QoS QPSK

Quadrature Amplitude Modulation QL Decomposition Quality of Service Quaternary Phase Shift Keying

RSC

Recursive Systematic Convolutional

SCCS SDMA SIC SIMO SINR SISO SNR SPC SQLD STBC STC STTC SUMF SUB SVD

Serially Concatenated Coding Scheme Space Division Multiple Access Successive Interference Cancellation Single Input Multiple Output Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio Single Input Single Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio Single Parity Check Code Sorted QL Decomposition Space–Time Block Code Space–Time Code Space–Time Trellis Code Single-User Matched Filter Single-User Bound Singular Value Decomposition

TDMA TDD

Time Division Multiple Access Time Division Duplex

UEP UMTS

Unequal Error Protection Universal Mobile Telecommunications System

V-BLAST

Vertical BLAST

WSSUS WLAN

Wide Sense Stationary Uncorrelated Scattering Wireless Local Area Network

ZF

Zero Forcing

xix

List of Symbols au [
] au A(D) A(W, D)

modulation symbols of user u at time instance
vector containing modulation symbols of user u Distance Spectrum of convolutional code Input Output Weight Enumerating Function of convolutional code

bu [
] bu Bc Bd β

code bit of user u at time instant
vector containing code bits of user u coherence bandwidth of channel Doppler bandwidth of channel load of CDMA system

c[k,
] cu C Cout

chip of spreading code at time instance
for kth symbol vector containing CDMA spreading sequence of user u channel capacity outage capacity

D du [i] du df dmin dH (a, b) Dµ Dµ Dµ,ν 2µ,ν

diversity degree information bit of user u at time instant i vector containing information bits of user u free distance of convolutional code minimum Hamming distance of a code Hamming distance between two vectors a and b set of received symbols that are closest to transmit symbol Xµ set complementary to Dµ set of received symbols that are closer to Xν than to Xµ squared Euclidean distance between symbols Xµ and Xν

EX {·} Eb EG (Rc ) Es E0 (·, ·) erfc(·)

expectation with respect to process X average energy per information bit Gallager exponent average energy per transmitted symbol Gallager function complementary error function

xxii

LIST OF SYMBOLS

f0 fd

carrier frequency Doppler frequency

gc gd Gp gR (t) GR (j ω) gT (t) GT (j ω) gµ (D) γ
[k]  γ¯

coding gain of space–time coding schemes diversity gain of space–time coding schemes processing gain of CDMA system impulse shaping filter at receiver spectrum of impulse shaping filter at receiver impulse shaping filter at transmitter spectrum impulse shaping filter at transmitter µth generator polynomial of convolutional or spreading code signal-to-noise ratio at receive antenna
and time instant k code average signal-to-noise ratio

H[k] H Hred H[k, µ]

η

matrix of MIMO channel at time instant k extended matrix of MIMO channel reduced matrix of MIMO channel submatrix of frequency selective MIMO channel corresponding to delay µ at time instant k channel coefficient between transmitter ξ and receiver ρ corresponding to delay µ at time instant k spectral efficiency of CDMA system

Im {·} I (Xµ ) I¯(X ) I¯(X , Y) I¯(X ; Y) I0 (·) I¯(X | Y) I¯diff (X )

imaginary part of a complex number information of event or symbol Xµ entropy of process X joint entropy of processes X and Y mutual information between processes X and Y zero-th order modified Bessel function of first kind uncertainty of X if Y is totally known differential entropy of process X

K κ

Rice factor: power ratio between line-of-sight and scattered components discrete delay

L(x) La (x) Le (x) La Lc Lp Lπ Lt L

log-likelihood ratio of variable x a priori log-likelihood ratio of variable x extrinsic log-likelihood ratio of variable x length of vector a constraint length of convolutional code period of puncturing length of interleaver length of channel impulse response hu [k] lower triangular matrix from QL decomposition

hρ,ξ [k, µ]

LIST OF SYMBOLS λµ 

µth eigenvalue of a square matrix diagonal matrix containing eigenvalues λµ

MX (s) m M

moment generating function of process X number of bits per symbol size of modulation alphabet

nν [k] NI NO NR Ns NT Nu N0

additive noise at receive antenna ν and time instant k number of inputs of MIMO system number of outputs of MIMO system number of receive antennas spreading factor of CDMA system number of transmit antennas number of active users power spectral density of complex noise in equivalent baseband

ω0

angular carrier frequency

pX (x)
u P Pb Pd Ps Pt Pw Pout XX (f ) φHH (t, τ ) HH (fD , τ ) HH (fD ) HH (τ ) XX Pr{·}

probability density function of process X interleaver for user u n × Lp puncturing matrix bit error probability pairwise error probability for code words with Hamming distance d symbol error probability target error probability word error probability (probability of decoding or detection failure) outage probability for fading channels power spectral density of process X auto correlation function of stochastic channel H Scattering function of stochastic channel H Doppler power spectrum of stochastic channel H Power delay profile of stochastic channel H covariance matrix of multivariate process X probability of certain event

Q(·) Q

quantization function unitary matrix from QL decomposition

R0 Rc Rccc Rcrc Rcwh r[
] Re {·}

cutoff rate overall code rate code rate of convolutional code code rate of repetition code code rate of Walsh-Hadamard code matched filter output at time instance
real part of a complex number

xxiii

xxiv

LIST OF SYMBOLS

s[k,
] S[
] σN2 σµ S

signature at time instance
for kth symbol system matrix of CDMA system at time instance
average power of noise singular value of a certain matrix diagonal matrix containing singular values σµ of matrix S

Tb Tc Ts tc τmax

duration of one information bit duration of one chip in spread spectrum systems symbol duration coherence time of channel maximal delay of channel impulse response

US

unitary matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of SSH

VS

unitary matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of SH S

wH (a) WZF WMMSE

Hamming weight of vector a ZF filter matrix (decorrelator) MMSE filter matrix

xBP (t) xu [k] xu X

time-continuous transmitted signal in bandpass domain transmitted symbol of user u at time instant k transmitted signal vector of user u (discrete) alphabet of transmitter consisting of symbols Xµ

yν [k] yu Y

received symbol at antenna ν and time instant k received signal vector of user u alphabet at receiver consisting of symbols Yν

∗ det(A) x
x

x∗ xH xˆ xT x2 XF X† X X

convolution determinant of matrix A real part of signal x imaginary part of signal x conjugate complex of signal x Hermitian of a vector x estimate of signal x transposed of a vector x norm of vector x (sum of squared magnitudes of elements) Frobenius norm of matrix X (see Appendix 1) Moore-Penrose pseudo inverse of matrix X scalar processes are written by calligraphic letters multivariate processes are written by underlined calligraphic letters

1

Introduction to Digital Communications This first chapter introduces some of the basics of digital communications that are needed in subsequent chapters. Section 1.1 starts with a brief introduction of fundamental multiple access techniques and the general structure of communication systems. Some of the most important parts of the systems are discussed in more detail later in the chapter. Section 1.2 addresses the mobile radio channel with its statistical properties and the way of modeling it. Some analysis concerning signal detection and the theoretical performance of linear schemes for different transmission channels are presented in Sections 1.3 and 1.4. Finally, Section 1.5 explains the principle of diversity and delivers basic results for outage and ergodic error probabilities.

1.1 Basic System Model 1.1.1 Introduction Vector channels, or multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels, represent a very general description for a wide range of applications. They incorporate SISO (Single-Input Single-Output), MISO (Multiple-Input Single-Output) and SIMO (Single-Input MultipleOutput) channels as special cases. Often, MIMO channels are only associated with multiple antenna systems. However, they are not restricted to this case but can be used in a much broader context, for example, for any kind of multiuser communication. Therefore, the aim of this work is to study MIMO systems for two specific examples, namely Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and multiple antenna systems. Besides a unified description using vector notations, detection algorithms are derived that make the similarity of both systems obvious. Figure 1.1 illustrates the considered scenario in a very abstract form. Generally, a common channel that may represent a single cell in a cellular network is accessed by NI inputs and NO outputs. In this context, the term channel is not limited to the physical transmission Wireless Communications over MIMO Channels Volker K¨uhn  2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

2

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

1 1 2

2 channel

NI

NO Figure 1.1 Principle of multiple access to a common channel

medium, that is, the radio channel, but has a more general meaning and also incorporates parts of a digital communication system. The boundary between the transmitter and the receiver on the one side, and the channel on the other side is not strict and depends on the considered scenario. Detailed information about specific descriptions can be found in subsequent chapters. Principally, single-user and multiuser communications are distinguished. In the singleuser case, the multiple inputs and outputs of a vector channel may correspond to different transmit and receive antennas, carrier frequencies, or time slots. Due to the fact that the data stems from a single user, intelligent signaling at the transmitter can be performed, for example, for efficient receiver implementations. In Chapter 6, multiple antenna systems will be used in several ways, depending on the channel characteristics and the system requirements. Multiple antennas can be employed for increasing the system’s diversity degree (Alamouti 1998; Naguib et al. 1998; Seshadri and Winters 1994; Tarokh et al. 1999a) and, therefore, enhance the link performance. The link reliability can also be improved by beamforming, which enlarges the signal to noise ratio (SNR). Alternatively, several data streams can be multiplexed over spatially separated channels in order to multiply the data rate without increasing bandwidth (Foschini 1996; Foschini and Gans 1998; Golden et al. 1998). On the contrary, the NI inputs and NO outputs may correspond to Nu independent user signals in the multiuser case.1 With reference to conventional mobile radio communications, a central base station coordinates the transmissions of uplink and downlink, that is, from mobile subscribers to the base station and vice versa, respectively. In the downlink, a synchronous transmission can be easily established because all the signals originate from the same transmitter. Moreover, knowledge about interactions between different users and their propagation conditions can be exploited at the base station. This allows sophisticated signaling in order to avoid mutual interference and to distribute the total transmit power onto different users efficiently. In many cases, intelligent signaling at the base station coincides with low complexity receivers, being very important for mobile terminals with limited battery power. However, optimal signaling strategies 1 In multiuser MIMO scenarios, transmitters and receivers are equipped with multiple antennas. These systems are a part of current research and possess an extremely high degree of freedom. They will be briefly introduced in Chapter 6.

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

3

for the downlink is only known for a few special cases and is still subject to intensive research. Establishing synchronous transmissions in the uplink requires high efforts because mobile subscribers transmit more or less independently. They only communicate with the base station and not among themselves. In most practical cases, they have no information about their influence on other users so that mutual interference cannot be avoided prior to transmission. Hence, sophisticated detection algorithms have to be deployed at the base station to compensate for this drawback.

1.1.2 Multiple Access Techniques Looking at the transmission of multiple data streams sharing a common medium, their separation is managed by multiplexing techniques in single-user scenarios or multiple access techniques in multiuser communications. In order to ensure reliable communication, many systems try to avoid interference by choosing orthogonal access schemes so that no multiple access interference (MAI) disturbs the transmission. However, in most cases, orthogonality cannot be maintained due to the influence of the mobile radio channel. The next subsections introduce the most important multiplexing and multiple access strategies. Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) and Multiple Access (TDMA) This relatively common multiple access technique divides the time axis into different time slots, each of length Tslot according to Figure 1.2. Each data packet or burst is assigned to a certain slot, whereby a user can also occupy several slots. A defined number Nslot of slots build a frame that is periodically repeated. Hence, each user has periodical access to the shared medium. Due to the influence of the transmission channel (cf. Section 1.2) and the restrictions of practical filter design, guard intervals of length T have to be inserted between successive slots in order to avoid interference between them. Within these intervals, no information is transmitted so that they represent redundancy and reduce the spectral efficiency of the communication system. Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) and Multiple Access (FDMA) Alternatively, the frequency axis can be divided into Nf subbands each of width B as illustrated in Figure 1.3. The data streams are now distributed on different frequency bands, f

1

3

2 T

Nslot Tslot

1 t

Figure 1.2 Principle of time division multiple access

4

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

Figure 1.3 Principle of frequency division multiple access

rather than on different time slots. However, in mobile environments, the signals’ bandwidths are spread by the Doppler effect, so that neighboring subbands interfere. Thus, gaps of an appropriate width f combating this effect at the expense of a reduced spectral efficiency are required for Frequency division multiple access (FDMA). Code Division Multiplexing (CDM) and Multiple Access (CDMA) In contrast to both the preceding schemes, CDMA allows simultaneous access on the channel in the same frequency range. The basic principle is to spectrally spread the data streams with specific sequences called spreading codes (Spread Spectrum technique). The signals can be distinguished by assigning them individual spreading codes. This opens a third dimension, as can be seen in Figure 1.4. One intuitive choice would lead to orthogonal codes, ensuring a parallel transmission of different user signals. However, the transmission channel generally destroys the orthogonality and multiuser interference (MUI) becomes a limiting factor concerning spectral efficiency (cf. Chapters 4 and 5). Space Division Multiplexing (SDM) and Multiple Access (SDMA) The fourth access scheme exploits the resource space (Figure 1.4 and Figure 1.5). Spatially separated data streams can simultaneously access the channel in the same frequency band,

Figure 1.4 Principle of code and space division multiple access

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

3

2

5

4

1 Nu

Figure 1.5 Principle of space division multiple access

provided that the locations of transmit and receive antennas are appropriately chosen. In mobile environments, this requirement is sometimes difficult to fulfill, because users are changing their position during the connection. Therefore, quasi-static scenarios or combinations with the aforementioned access techniques are often considered. Mutual interference is also likely to occur in Space division multiple access (SDMA) systems because the transmitter and the receiver have no perfect channel knowledge of what would be necessary to totally avoid interference. As expected, all the mentioned access schemes can be combined. The well-known Global System for Mobile (GSM) Communications and Digital Cellular System (DCS)1800 standards both combine Time division multiple access (TDMA) and FDMA. In UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System) or IMT-2000 (International Mobile Communications) systems, CDMA is used in connection with TDMA and FDMA (Dahlman et al. 1998; Ojanper¨a and Prasad 1998b; Toskala et al. 1998). While TDMA, FDMA, and CDMA have already been used for a fairly long time, SDMA is rather recent in comparison. This development is a result of the demand to use licenses that are assigned to certain frequency bands as efficiently as possible. Hence, all the resources have to be exploited for reaching this goal.

1.1.3 Principle Structure of SISO Systems Since the behavior and the properties of a MIMO system vastly depend on the characteristics of the underlying SISO systems between each pair of transmit and receive antennas, this subsection describes their principle structure. Figure 1.6 shows a simplified time-discrete block diagram of a SISO communication link. The time-discreteness is expressed by square brackets and the time indices i,
, and k indicate different symbol rates of the corresponding signals. Neglecting a lot of the fundamental components of practical systems like source coding, analog-to-digital conversion and so on, the transmitter consists of three blocks that are of special interest here: a forward error correction (FEC) encoder, an interleaver  and a signal mapper. Due to our focus on digital communications, the inputs and the outputs of an FEC encoder and an interleaver are binary, while the output of the signal mapper depends on the type of modulation and can take on symbols out of an M-ary alphabet X. Conventionally, M = 2m is a power of two. The receiver is comprised of the corresponding counterparts of the above-mentioned blocks in reverse order. The first

6

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS d[i]

FEC encoder

b[
] 

signal mapper

x[k]

time-discrete channel

ˆ d[i]

FEC decoder

r[
] −1

SP/ demapper

y[k]

Figure 1.6 Principle structure of digital communication systems

block performs some kind of signal processing (SP) – depending on the channel – and the demapping. It is followed by a de-interleaver −1 and an FEC decoder delivering estimates ˆ of the transmitted information bits. d[i] All the blocks mentioned thus far will be subsequently described in more detail. However, some remarks on the time-discrete channel depicted in Figure 1.6 are necessary at this point. In order to simplify the description and to concentrate on the main focus of this work, all time-continuous components of the modulator and the demodulator are declared as parts of a time-discrete channel model generally described in the equivalent baseband (cf. Section 1.2). Therefore, the only parts of the modulator and the demodulator that appear separately in Figure 1.6 are the signal mapper and the demapper. These assumptions coincide with a citation of Massey (1984): ‘the purpose of the modulation system is to create a good discrete channel from the modulator input to the demodulator output, and the purpose of the coding system is to transmit the information bits reliably through this discrete channel at the highest practicable rate.’ However, it is not always easy to strictly separate both devices (e.g. for coded modulation (Biglieri et al. 1991; Ungerboeck 1982)). Interleaving Interleaving plays an important role in many digital communication systems for manifold reasons. In the context of mobile radio communications, fading channels often lead to bursty errors, that is, several successive symbols may be corrupted by deep fades. This has a crucial impact on the decoding performance, for example, of convolutional codes because of its sensitivity to bursty errors (compare the decoding of convolutional codes in Chapter 3). In order to overcome this difficulty, interleaving is applied. At the transmitter, an interleaver simply permutes the data stream b[
] in a specified manner, so that the symbols are transmitted in a different order. Consequently, a de-interleaver has to be employed at the receiver, in order to reorder the symbols back into the original succession. Moreover, we will see in Section 3 that interleaving is also employed in concatenated coding schemes.

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS b[
]

7

write ˜ b[
]

b[0] b[3] b[6] b[9] read b[1] b[4] b[7] b[10] b[2] b[5] b[8] b[11]

Figure 1.7 Structure of block interleaver of length Lπ = 12 Block interleaver There are several types of interleaving. The simplest one is termed block interleaver, which divides a sequence into blocks of length Lπ . The symbols b[
] within each block are then permuted by writing them column-wise into an array consisting of Lrow rows and Lcol columns, and reading them row by row. An example with Lrow = 3 and Lcol = 4 is shown in Figure 1.7. The input sequence b[0], b[1], . . . b[11] develops into the following due to interleaving b[0], b[3], b[6], b[9], b[1], b[4], b[7] b[10], b[2], b[5], b[8], b[11]. It is recognized that there is a spacing between the originally successive symbols of LI = 4. This gap is called interleaving depth. The optimum number of rows and columns and, therefore, the interleaving depth depends on several factors that are discussed in subsequent chapters. Convolutional interleaving For the sake of completeness, convolutional interleaving should be mentioned here. It provides the same interleaving depth as block interleaving, but with lower delays and lesser memory. However, since this interleaver is not addressed later in the chapter, further details are not discussed and instead the reader is referred to (Viterbi and Omura 1979). Random interleaving The application of block interleaving in concatenated coding schemes generally leads to a weak performance. Due to the regular structure of the interleaver it may ensue that the temporal distance between pairs of symbols does not change by interleaving, resulting in poor distance properties of the entire code (cf. Section 3.6). Therefore, random or pseudorandom interleavers are often applied in this context. Pseudo-random interleavers can be generated by calculating row and column indices with modulo arithmetic. For concatenated coding schemes, interleavers are optimized with respect to the constituent codes. Interleaving delay A tight restriction to the total size of interleavers may occur for delay sensitive applications such as full duplex speech transmission. Here, delays of only around 10 ms are tolerable.

8

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

Since the interleaver has to first be completely written before it can be read out, its size Lπ directly determines the delay t = Lπ · Ts .

1.2 Characteristics of Mobile Radio Channels 1.2.1 Equivalent Baseband Representation Wireless channels for mobile radio communications are challenging media that require careful system design for reliable transmission. As SISO channels, they represent an important building block of vector channels. Therefore, this section describes their time-discrete, equivalent baseband representation in more detail. Using a representation in the equivalent baseband is beneficial for simulation purposes, because the carrier whose frequency is generally much higher than the signal bandwidth need not to be explicitly considered. Figure 1.8 depicts the entire channel model that comprises all time-continuous analog components, including those from the transmitter and the receiver. The whole structure describes a time-discrete model, whose input x[k] is a sequence of generally complex-valued symbols of duration Ts according to some finite symbol alphabet X. The output sequence typically y[k] has the same rate 1/Ts and its symbols are distributed within the complex plane C. The input x[k] is first transformed by the transmit filter gT (t) of bandwidth B into a time-continuous, band limited signal
x[k] · gT (t − kTs ) (1.1) x(t) = Ts · k

called complex envelope. Denoting the symbols of the alphabet X by Xµ and assuming that ∞ the energy of the transmit filter impulse response is defined to −∞ |gT (t)|2 dt = Ts−1 , a √ jω t 2e 0 x(t)

x[k]

analog part of transmitter

Re {·}

gT (t)

xBP (t)

hBP (t, τ ) √1 e−j ω0 t 2

y[k]

y(t) gW [k]

gR (t) analog part of receiver

+ (t) yBP

nBP (t) yBP (t) j H {·}

Figure 1.8 Structure of the time-discrete, equivalent baseband representation of a mobile radio channel

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS a)

XX (f ) σX2

−f0

B

+f0 f

XBP XBP (f )

b)

9 c)

HBP HBP (f ) NBP NBP (f )

σX2 /2

σX2 /2

N0 /2

2B

2B

2B

2B

−f0

+f0 f

−f0

+f0 f

Figure 1.9 Power spectral densities for a) complex envelope, b) bandpass signal and c) transmission channel for a rectangular shape of GT (j ω) single symbol Ts · x[k] · gT (t − kTs ) has the average energy  ∞ |gT (t)|2 dt = Ts · E{|Xµ |2 } Es = Ts2 · E{|Xµ |2 } · −∞

(1.2)

resulting in an average power of σX2 = Es /Ts = E{|Xµ |2 }.2 For zero-mean and independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) symbols x[k], the average spectral density of x(t) is (Kammeyer 2004; Kammeyer and K¨uhn 2001; Proakis 2001) XX (j ω) = Ts · |GT (j ω)|2 · E{|Xµ |2 } = Es · |GT (j ω)|2 .

(1.3)

Obviously, it largely depends on the spectral shape of the transmit filter gT (t), and not on the kind of modulation scheme. Proceeding toward transmission, the real-valued bandpass signal √  √    xBP (t) = 2 · Re x(t) · ej ω0 t = 2 · x
(t) cos(ω0 t) − x

(t) sin(ω0 t) (1.4) is obtained by shifting x(t) into the bandpass region with the carrier frequency ω0 = 2πf0 √ and taking the real part. The factor 2 in (1.4) keeps the signal power and the symbol energy constant during modulation. The average spectral density of xBP (t) has the form XBP XBP (j ω) =

Es  · |GT (j ω − j ω0 )|2 + |GT (j ω + j ω0 )|2 . 2

(1.5)

Besides the shift to ±ω0 , it differs from XX (j ω) by the factor 1/2 due to the total transmit power constraint. Figure 1.9 sketches the spectral densities for a rectangular shape of GT (j ω) with B = 1/(2Ts ). Now, xBP (t) is transmitted over the mobile radio channel, which is generally represented by its time-variant impulse response hBP (t, τ ) and an additive noise term nBP (t) with spectral density N0 /2 (1.6) yBP (t) = hBP (t, τ ) ∗ xBP (t) + nBP (t). The convolution in (1.6) is defined by



∞

hBP (t, τ ) ∗ xBP (t) =

hBP (t, τ )xBP (t − τ ) dτ.

(1.7)

0 2 The impulse response g (t) itself has the dimension s −1 because its spectrum G (j ω) = F {g (t)} has no T T T dimension.

10

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS a)

b) Y+ Y+ (f ) BP BP N+ N+ (f )

YBP YBP (f ) NBP NBP (f )

BP

+f0 f

YY (f ) NN (f )

2N0

BP

N0

N0 /2 −f0

c)

2B

−f0

+f0 f

−f0

B

+f0 f

Figure 1.10 Power spectral densities for a) received bandpass signal, b) analytical signal and c) received complex envelope In order to express yBP in the equivalent baseband, negative frequencies are eliminated with the Hilbert transformation (Kammeyer 2004; Proakis 2001)  ∞ a(τ ) dτ
 F {H {a(t)}} = −j sgn(ω)A(j ω). (1.8) H {a(t)} = t −∞ − τ Therefore, adding j H {yBP (t)} to the received signal yBP (t) yields the complex analytical signal

2YBP (j ω) for ω > 0 + + 
YBP (j ω) = yBP (t) = yBP (t) + j H {yBP (t)} (1.9) 0 else whose spectrum vanishes for negative frequencies. However, for positive frequencies, the spectrum is doubled or, equivalently, the spectral power density is quadrupled (Figure 1.10). + (t) is shifted back into the baseband and weighted by a factor According to Figure 1.8, yBP √ 1/ 2 in order to keep the average power constant. With reference to the background noise, this leads to a spectral density of N0 . As is shown in the Appendix A.1, the output of the receive filter gR (t) in Figure 1.8 has the form
˜ kTs ) + n(t) y(t) = gR (t) ∗ h(t, τ ) ∗ x(t) + n(t) = x[k] · h(t, (1.10) k −j ω0 t denotes the equivalent baseband representations of where h(t, τ ) = 1/2 · h+ BP (t, τ )e √ channel impulse response and n(t) = gR (t) ∗ (n+ (t)e−j ω0 t / 2) the filtered background ˜ kTs ) is comprised of a transmit and receive filter as well as the noise. The filter h(t, channel impulse response, and represents the response of a time-discrete channel on an impulse transmitted at time instant kTs .3 The optimum receive filter gR (t) that maximizes the SNR at its sampled output has to be matched to the concatenation of channel impulse response and the transmit filter (Forney 1972; Kammeyer 2004), that is, gR (t) = f ∗ (−t) with f (t) = gT (t) ∗ h(t, τ ) holds. In order to avoid interference between successive symbols, the transmit and receive filters are generally chosen such that their convolution fulfills the first Nyquist criterion (Nyquist 1928; Proakis 2001). This criterion also ensures that the filtered and sampled noise remains 3 Note

˜ kTs ) does not represent delay τ , but the transmission time kTs . that the second parameter of h(t,

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

11

white, and a symbol-wise detection is still optimum. However, even if gT (t) ∗ gR (t) fulfills the first Nyquist criterion, the channel impulse response h(t, τ ) between them destroys this property and the background noise n(t) is colored. Therefore, a prewhitening filter gW [k] working at the sampling rate 1/Ts and decorrelating the noise samples n(t)|t=kTs is required.4 Finally, the time-discrete equivalent baseband channel delivers a complex-valued signal y[k] = gW [k] ∗ y(t)|t=kTs by sampling y(t) at rate 1/Ts and filtering it with gW [k]. Throughout this work, gT (t) is assumed to be a perfect lowpass filter of bandwidth B = 1/(2Ts ). With gR (t) matched to h(t, τ ) ∗ gT (t) and a perfect prewhitening filter, the received signal y[k] has the form y[k] =

Lt


h[k, κ] · x[k − κ] + n[k]

(1.11)

κ=0

where Lt denotes the total filter length of the time-discrete channel model h[k, κ] working at rate 1/Ts and n[k] is termed Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN). It is described in more detail in the next subsection, followed by a description of the frequency-selective fading channel.

1.2.2 Additive White Gaussian Noise Every data transmission is disturbed by noise stemming from thermal noise, noise of electronic devices, and other sources. Due to the superposition of many different statistically independent processes at the receive antenna, the noise nBP (t) is generally modeled as white and Gaussian distributed. The attribute white describes the flat spectral density that corresponds with uncorrelated successive samples in the time domain. For Gaussian distributed samples, this is equivalent with statistical independence. A model reflecting this behavior is the AWGN channel. As mentioned in the last section, its two-sided spectral power density N0 /2 results in infinite power due to the infinite bandwidth. Therefore, this model only gains practical relevance with a bandwidth limitation, for example, by filtering with gR (t). In this subsection, the channel is assumed to be frequency-nonselective and time invariant so that h(t, τ ) = δ(τ ) holds and the transmit and receive filters are perfect lowpass filters (cf. Figure 1.9 and 1.11b). They fulfill the first Nyquist condition (Nyquist 1928), that is, their spectra are symmetric with respect to the Nyquist frequency fN = 1/(2Ts ).5 Therefore, the sampled equivalent baseband noise n[k] = n(t)|t=kTs remains white (cf. Figure 1.11) (Kammeyer 2004) and has a spectral density of N0 (cf. (1.9) and Figure 1.10). N0 is equally distributed onto the real part n
[k] and the imaginary part n

[k], each with a density of N0 /2. They are independent of each other resulting in the joint density pN (n) = pN
(n
) · pN

(n

) 1

= e 2π σN2



2 − n2 2σ

N


1

· e 2π σN2





2 − n2 2σ

N



|n|2

1 − σ2 = e N π σN2

(1.12)

4 In practice, the receive filter gR (t) is only matched to gT (t) due to lower implementation costs and imperfect knowledge of the channel impulse response. 5 For perfect lowpass filters, B = f = 1/(2T ) holds, that is, 2BT symbols can be transmitted per channel N s s usage.

12

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS NN (f )

b)

a) n[k] x[k]

N0

B

y[k] −f0

+f0

f

Figure 1.11 a) Model and b) spectral density of AWGN channel in the equivalent baseband representation of the complex baseband noise. The power of n(t) and, therefore, n[k] is σN2 = 2B · N0 =

N0 = σN2
+ σN2

. Ts

(1.13)

The perfect lowpass filter gR (t) = gT∗ (−t) with bandwidth B is matched to gT (t) (Kammeyer 2004; Proakis 2001) and maximizes the SNR at its output. With the signal power σX2 = Es /Ts we obtain the signal to noise ratio SNR =

σX2BP σN2 BP

=

σX2 Es /Ts Es = = . 2 N0 /Ts N0 σN

(1.14)

as a characteristic measure of the AWGN channel in the baseband, as well as in the bandpass regime.

1.2.3 Frequency-Selective Time-Variant Fading For mobile radio systems, the propagation of radio waves is disturbed by scattering, reflections, and shadowing. Generally, many replicas of the same signal arrive at the receive antenna with different delays, attenuations, and phases. Moreover, the channel is time-variant due to the movements of the transmitter or the receiver. A channel with N propagation paths can be described by its equivalent baseband impulse response h(t, τ ) =

N−1


h(t, ν) · δ(τ − τν ),

(1.15)

ν=0

where t denotes the observation time and h(t, ν) the complex-valued weighting coefficient corresponding to the ν-th path with delay τν . Statistical Characterization Due to the stochastic nature of mobile radio channels, they are generally classified by their statistical properties. The autocorrelation function φHH (t, τ ) = E{h∗ (t, τ )h(t + t, τ )}

(1.16)

of h(t, τ ) with respect to t is an appropriate measure for this classification. The faster the channel changes, the faster φHH (t, τ ) vanishes in the direction of t. This relationship

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

13

can also be expressed in the frequency domain. The Fourier transformation of φHH (t, τ ) with respect to t yields the scattering function HH (fd , τ ) = F {φHH (t, τ )} .

(1.17)

The Doppler frequency fd originates from the relative motions between the transmitter and the receiver. Integrating over τ leads to the Doppler power spectrum ∞ HH (fd ) =

HH (fd , τ ) dτ,

(1.18)

0

describing the power distribution with respect to fd . The range over which HH (fd ) is almost nonzero is called Doppler bandwidth Bd . It represents a measure for the time variance of the channel and its reciprocal 1 (1.19) tc = Bd denotes the coherence time. For tc  Ts , the channel is slowly fading, for tc  Ts , it changes remarkably during the symbol duration Ts . In the latter case, it is called time-selective and time diversity (cf. Section 1.4) can be gained when channel coding is applied. Integrating HH (fd , τ ) versus fd instead of τ delivers the power delay profile fd max

HH (τ ) =

HH (fd , τ ) dfd

(1.20)

−fd max

that describes the power distribution with respect to τ . The coherence bandwidth defined by Bc =

1 τmax

(1.21)

represents the bandwidth over which the channel is nearly constant. For frequency-selective channels, B  Bc holds, that is, the signal bandwidth B is much larger than the coherence bandwidth and the channel behaves differently in different parts of the signal’s spectrum. In this case, the maximum delay τmax is larger than Ts so that successive symbols overlap, resulting in linear channel distortions called intersymbol interference (ISI). If the coefficients h[k, κ] in the time domain are statistically independent, frequency diversity is obtained (cf. Section 1.4). For B  Bc , the channel is frequency-nonselective, that is, its spectral density is constant within the considered bandwidth (flat fading). Examples for different power delay profiles can be found in Appendix A.2. Modeling Mobile Radio Channels Typically, frequency-selective channels are modeled with time-discrete finite impulse response (FIR) filters following the wide sense stationary uncorrelated scattering (WSSUS) approach (H¨oher 1992; Schulze 1989). According to (1.11), the signal is passed through a tapped-delay-line and weighted at each tap with complex channel coefficients h[k, κ] as shown in Figure 1.12.

14

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS x[k]

h[k, 0]

Ts

Ts

Ts

h[k, 1]

h[k, 2]

h[k, Lt − 1]

n[k] y[k]

+

Figure 1.12 Tapped-delay-line model of frequency-selective channel with Lt taps

Although the coefficients are comprised of transmit and receive filters, as well as the channel impulse response h(t, τ ) and the prewhitening filter gW [k], (as stated in Section 1.2.1), they are assumed to be statistically independent (uncorrelated scattering). The length Lt = τmax /Ts of the filter depends on the ratio of maximum channel delay τmax and symbol duration Ts . Thus, the delay axis is divided into equidistant intervals and for example, the nκ propagation paths falling into the κ-th interval compose the coefficient h[k, κ] =

n
κ −1

ej 2πfd,i kTs +j ϕi

(1.22)

i=0

with ϕi as the initial phase of the i-th component. The power distribution among the taps according to the power delay profiles described in Appendix A.2 (Tables A.1 and A.3) can be modeled with the distribution of the delays κ. The more delays that fall into a certain interval, the higher the power associated with this interval. Alternatively, a constant number of n propagation paths for each tap can be assumed. In this case, h[k, κ] = ρκ ·

n−1


ej 2πfd,i kTs +j ϕi

(1.23)

i=0

holds and the power distribution is taken into account by adjusting the parameters ρκ . The Doppler frequencies fd,i in (1.22) and (1.23) depend on the relative velocity v between the transmitter and the receiver, the speed of light c0 and the carrier frequency f0 fd =

v · f0 · cos α. c0

(1.24)

In (1.24), α represents the angle between the direction of arrival of the examined propagation path and the receiver’s movement. Therefore, its distribution also determines that of fd leading to Table A.2. Maximum and minimum Doppler frequencies occur for α = 0 and α = 180, respectively, and determine the Doppler bandwidth Bd = 2fd max . The classical Jakes distribution depicted in Figure 1.13

HH (fd ) =

√

0

A 1−(fd /fd max )2

|fd | ≤ fd max else,

(1.25)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

15

pfd (fd /fd max ) →

2

1.5

1

0.5

0 −1.5

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 fd /fd max →

1

1.5

Figure 1.13 Distribution of Doppler frequencies for isotropic radiations (Jakes spectrum)

is obtained for isotropic radiations without line-of-sight (LoS) connection. For referred directions of arrival, Gaussian distributions with appropriate means and variances are often assumed (cf. Table A.2 for τ > 0.5 µs). Unless otherwise stated, nondissipative channels assume meaning, so that EH { κ |h[k, κ]|2 } = 1 holds. In the following part, the focus is on the statistics of a single channel coefficient and, therefore, drop the indices k and κ. For a large number of propagation paths per tap, real and imaginary parts of H are statistically independent and Gaussian distributed stochastic √ processes and the whole magnitude |H| = H
2 + H

2 is Rayleigh distributed

2ξ/σH2 · exp(−ξ 2 /σH2 ) ξ ≥ 0 p|H| (ξ ) = (1.26) 0 else  with mean EH {|h|} = π σH2 /2. In (1.26), σH2 denotes the average power of H. The instantaneous power which is chi-squared distributed with two degrees of freedom

1/σH2 · exp(−ξ/σH2 ) ξ ≥ 0 p|H|2 (ξ ) = (1.27) 0 else while the phase is uniformly distributed in [−π, π ]. If a LoS connection exists between the transmitter and the receiver, the total power P of the channel coefficient h is shared among a constant LoS and a Rayleigh fading component with a variance of σH2 . The power ratio between both parts is called Rice factor 2 2 K = σLoS /σH2 . Hence, the LoS component has a power of σLoS = KσH2 and the channel coefficient becomes  h = σH2 · K + α (1.28) with total power P = (1 + K)σH2 . The fading process α consists of real and imaginary parts that are statistically independent zero-mean Gaussian processes each with variance σH2 /2.

16

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS 1

K K K K

2

=0 =1 =3 =5

0.6 0.4

=0 =1 =6 = 11

1

0.5

0.2 0 0

K K K K

1.5

p|H| (ξ ) →

0.8

p|H| (ξ ) →

b) P = 1

a) σH2 = 1

1

2 ξ→

3

4

0 0

1

2

3

ξ→

Figure 1.14 Rice distributions for different Rice factors K As shown in (Proakis 2001), the magnitude of H is Ricean distributed

   2ξ/σH2 · exp − ξ 2 /σH2 − K · I0 2ξ K/σH2 ξ ≥0 p|H| (ξ ) = 0 else .

(1.29)

In (1.29), I0 (·) denotes the zeroth-order modified Bessel function of first kind (Benedetto and Biglieri 1999). With reference to the squared magnitude, we obtain the density

   1/σH2 · exp − ξ/σH2 − K · I0 2 ξ K/σH2 ξ ≥0 (1.30) p|H|2 (ξ ) = 0 else . The phase is no longer uniformly distributed. Figure 1.14a shows some Rice distributions for a constant fading variance σH2 = 1 and varying Rice factor. For K = 0, the direct component vanishes and pure Rayleigh fading is obtained. In Figure 1.14b, the total average power is fixed to P = 1 and σH2 = P /(K + 1) is adjusted with respect to K. For a growing Rice factor, the probability density function becomes more narrow and reduces to a Dirac impulse for K → ∞. This extreme case corresponds to the AWGN channel without any fading. The reason for especially discussing the above channels is that they somehow represent extreme propagation conditions. The AWGN channel represents the best case because noise contributions can never be avoided perfectly. The frequency-nonselective Rayleigh fading channel describes the worst-case scenario. Finally, Rice fading can be interpreted as a combination of both, where the Rice factor K adjusts the ratio between AWGN and fading parts.

1.2.4 Systems with Multiple Inputs and Outputs So far, this section has only described systems with a single input and a single output. Now, the scenario is extended to MIMO systems that have already been introduced in

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS h1,1 [k, κ]

17 n1 [k]

h2,1 [k, κ]

x1 [k]

y1 [k] n2 [k] y2 [k]

x2 [k] h2,NI [k, κ]

nNO [k]

hNO ,NI [k, κ]

xNI [k]

yNO [k]

Figure 1.15 General structure of frequency-selective MIMO channel

Subsection 1.1.1. However, at this point we are restricted to a general description. Specific communication systems are treated in Chapters 4 to 6. According to Figure 1.1, the MIMO system consists of NI inputs and NO outputs. Based on (1.11), the output of a frequency-selective SISO channel can be described by y[k] =

L t −1


h[k, κ] · x[k − κ] + n[k].

κ=0

This relationship now has to be extended for MIMO systems. As a consequence, NI signals xµ [k], 1 ≤ µ ≤ NI , form the input of our system at each time instant k and we obtain NO output signals yν [k], 1 ≤ ν ≤ NO . Each pair (µ, ν) of inputs and outputs is connected by a channel impulse response hν,µ [k, κ] as depicted in Figure 1.15. Therefore, the ν-th output at time instant k can be expressed as yν [k] =

NI L t −1



hν,µ [k, κ] · xµ [k − κ] + nν [k]

(1.31)

µ=1 κ=0

where Lt denotes the largest number of taps among all the contributing channels. Exploiting vector notations by comprising all the output signals yν [k] into a column vector y[k] and all the input signals xµ [k] into a column vector x[k], (1.31) becomes y[k] =

L t −1


H[k, κ] · x[k − κ] + n[k].

(1.32)

κ=0

In (1.32), the channel matrix has the form  h1,1 [k, κ]  .. H[k, κ] =  .

··· .. . hNO ,1 [k, κ] · · ·

h1,NI [k, κ] .. .

  .

(1.33)

hNO ,NI [k, κ]

Finally, we can combine the Lt channel matrices H[k, κ] to obtain a single matrix H[k] = [H[k, 0] · · · H[k, Lt − 1]]. With the new input vector xLt [k] = [x[k]T · · · x[k − Lt − 1]T ]T we obtain (1.34) y[k] = H[k] · xLt [k] + n[k].

18

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

1.3 Signal Detection 1.3.1 Optimal Decision Criteria This section briefly introduces some basic principles of signal detection. Specific algorithms for special systems are described in the corresponding chapters. Assuming a frame-wise transmission, that is, a sequence x consisting of Lx discrete, independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) symbols x[k] is transmitted over a SISO channel as discussed in the last section. Moreover, we are restricted to an uncoded transmission, while the detection of coded sequences is subject to Chapter 3. The received sequence is denoted by y and comprises Ly symbols y[k]. Sequence Detection For frequency-selective channels, y suffers from ISI and has to be equalized at the receiver. The optimum decision rule for general channels with respect to the frame error probability Pf looks for the sequence x˜ that maximizes the a posteriori probability Pr{X = x˜ | y}, that is, the probability that x˜ was transmitted under the constraint that y was received. Applying Bayes’ rule Pr{X = x˜ } , (1.35) Pr{X = x˜ | Y = y} = pY|˜x (y) · pY (y) we obtain the maximum a posteriori (MAP) sequence detector   xˆ = argmax Pr{˜x | y} = argmax pY|˜x (y) · Pr{˜x} x˜ ∈XLx

(1.36)

x˜ ∈XLx

where XLx denotes the set of sequences with length Lx and symbols x[k] ∈ X.6 It illustrates that the sequence MAP detector takes into account the channel influence by pY|˜x (y) as well as a priori probabilities Pr{˜x} of possible sequences. It has to be emphasized that pY|˜x (y) is a probability density function since y is distributed continuously. On the contrary, Pr{˜x | y} represents a probability because x˜ serves as a hypothesis taken from a finite alphabet XLx and y represents a fixed constraint. If either Pr{˜x} is not known, a priori to the receiver or all sequences are uniformly distributed resulting in a constant Pr{˜x}, we obtain the maximum likelihood (ML) sequence detector (1.37) xˆ = argmax pY|˜x (y). x˜ ∈XLx

Under these assumptions, it represents the optimal detector minimizing Pf . Since the symbols x[k] in x˜ are elements of a discrete set X (cf. Section 1.4), the detectors in (1.36) and (1.37) solve a combinatorial problem that cannot be fixed by gradient methods. An exhaustive search within the set of all possible sequences x˜ ∈ XLx requires a computational effort that grows exponentially with |X| and Lx and is prohibitive for most practical cases. An efficient algorithm for an equivalent problem – the decoding of convolutional codes (cf. Section 3.4) – was found by Viterbi in 1967 (Viterbi 1967). Forney showed in (Forney 1972) that the Viterbi algorithm is optimal for detecting sequences in the presence of ISI. notational simplicity, pY|X=˜x (y) is simplified to pY|˜x (y) and equivalently Pr{X = x˜ } to Pr{˜x}. The term pY (y) can be neglected because it does not depend on x˜ . 6 For

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

19

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) and CDMA systems offer different solutions for sequence detection in ISI environments. They are described in Chapter 4. Symbol-by-Symbol Detection While the Viterbi algorithm minimizes the error probability when detecting sequences, the optimal symbol-by-symbol MAP detector


x[k] ˆ = argmax Pr{X [k] = Xµ | y} = argmax Xµ ∈X

Xµ ∈X




= argmax Xµ ∈X

Pr{X = x˜ | y}

x˜ ∈XLx

x[k]=X ˜ µ

pY|˜x (y) · Pr{˜x}

(1.38)

x˜ ∈XLx

x[k]=X ˜ µ

minimizes the symbol error probability Ps . Obviously, the difference compared to (1.36) is the fact that all sequences x˜ with x[k] ˜ = Xµ contribute to the decision, and not only to the most probable one. Both approaches need not deliver the same decisions as the following example demonstrates. Consider a sequence x = [x[0], x[1]] of length Lx = 2 with binary symbols x[k] ∈ {X0 , X1 }. The conditional probabilities Pr{˜x | y} = Pr{x[0], ˜ x[1] ˜ | y} are exemplarily summarized in Table 1.1. While the MAP sequence detector delivers the sequence xˆ = [X0 , X1 ] with the highest a posteriori probability Pr{˜x | y} = 0.27, the symbol-by-symbol detector decides in favor to Pr{X [0] = Xµ | y} =




Pr{X [0] = Xµ , X [1] = Xν | y}

Xν ∈X

(and an equivalent expression for x[1]) resulting in the decisions x[0] ˆ = x[1] ˆ = X0 . However, the difference between both approaches is only visible at low SNRs and vanishes at low error rates. Again, for unknown a priori probability or uniformly distributed sequences, the corresponding symbol-by-symbol ML detector is obtained by x[k] ˆ = argmax pY|X [k]=Xµ (y) = argmax Xµ ∈X

Xµ ∈X




pY|˜x (y).

x˜ ∈XLx x[k]=X ˜ µ

Table 1.1 Illustration of sequence and symbol-by-symbol MAP detection Pr{x[0], ˜ x[1] ˜ | y} x[0] ˜ = X0 x[0] ˜ = X1 Pr{x[1] ˜ | y}

x[1] ˜ = X0

x[1] ˜ = X1

Pr{x[0] ˜ | y}

0.26 0.25 0.51

0.27 0.22 0.49

0.53 0.47

(1.39)

20

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

Memoryless channels For memoryless channels like AWGN and flat fading channels and i.i.d. symbols x[k],  the a posteriori probability Pr{˜x | y} can be factorized into k Pr{x[k] ˜ | y[k]}. Hence, the detector no longer needs to consider the whole sequence, but can instead decide symbol by symbol. In this case, the time index k can be dropped and (1.38) becomes xˆ = argmax Pr{X = Xµ | y}. Xµ ∈X

(1.40)

Equivalently, the ML detector in (1.39) reduces to xˆ = argmax pY|Xµ (y).

(1.41)

Xµ ∈X

1.3.2 Error Probability for AWGN Channel This section shall describe the general way by which to determine the probabilities of decision errors. The derivations are restricted to memoryless channels but can be extended to channels with memory or trellis-coded systems. In these cases, vectors instead of symbols have to be considered. For a simple AWGN channel, y = x + n holds and the probability density function pY|Xµ (y) in (1.41) has the form pY|Xµ (y) =

2 2 1 · e−|y−Xµ | /σN 2 π σN

(1.42)

(cf. (1.12)). With (1.42), a geometrical interpretation of the ML detector in (1.41) shows that the symbol Xµ out of X that minimizes the squared Euclidean distance |y − Xµ |2 is determined. Let us now define the decision region   (1.43) Dµ = y | |y − Xµ |2 < |y − Xν |2 ∀ Xν = Xµ for symbol Xµ comprising all symbols y ∈ C whose Euclidean distance to Xµ is smaller than to any other symbol Xν = Xµ . The complementary set is denoted by Dµ . Assuming / Dµ or equivalently y ∈ Dµ . The that Xµ was transmitted, a detection error occurs for y ∈  complementary set can be expressed by the union Dµ = ν=µ Dµ,ν of the sets   Dµ,ν = y | |y − Xµ |2 > |y − Xν |2 (1.44) containing all symbols y whose Euclidean distance to a specific Xν is smaller than to Xµ . This does not mean that Xν has the smallest distance of all symbols to y ∈ Dµ,ν . The symbol error probability can now be approximated by the well-known union bound (Proakis 2001)        Dµ,ν Ps (Xµ ) = Pr y ∈ Dµ = Pr y ∈   ≤


ν=µ

ν=µ





Pr y ∈ Dµ,ν .

(1.45)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

21

The equality in (1.45) holds if and only if the sets Dµ,ν are disjointed. The upper (union) bound simplifies the calculation remarkably because in many cases it is much easier to determine the pairwise sets Dµ,ν than to exactly describe the decision region Dµ . Substituting y = Xµ + n in (1.44) yields     Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν } = Pr |Y − Xµ |2 > |Y − Xν |2 = Pr |N |2 > |Xµ − Xν + N |2     (1.46) = Pr Re (Xµ − Xν ) · N ∗ < − 12 |Xµ − Xν |2     η ξ In (1.46), η is new a zero-mean Gaussian distributed real random variable with variance ση2 = |Xµ − Xν |2 σN2 /2 and ξ a negative constant. This leads to the integral Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν } = 



1 π |Xµ − Xν |2 σN2

−|Xµ −Xν |2 /2 −

−∞

e

η2 |Xµ −Xν |2 σ 2 N

dη

(1.47)

that is not solvable in closed form. With the complementary error function (Benedetto and Biglieri 1999; Bronstein et al. 2000)  ∞  x 2 2 2 2 e−ξ dξ = 1 − √ e−ξ dξ = 1 − erf(x). (1.48) erfc(x) = √ π x π 0 and the substitution ξ = η/(|Xµ − Xν |σN ) we obtain the pairwise error probability between symbols Xµ and Xν !" # |Xµ − Xν |2 1 Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν } = · erfc . (1.49) 2 4σN2 Next, we normalize the squared Euclidean distance |Xµ − Xν |2 by the average symbol power σX2 |Xµ − Xν |2 |Xµ − Xν |2 2µ,ν = = (1.50) 2 Es /Ts σX so that the average error probability can be calculated with (1.14) to  
Ps = E Ps (Xµ ) = Ps (Xµ ) · Pr{Xµ } Xµ

 " & '2
 E 1
µ,ν s . Pr{Xµ } · erfc  · ≤ 2 X 2 N 0 X =X µ

ν

(1.51)

µ

Equation (1.51) shows that the symbol error rate solely depends on the squared Euclidean distance between competing symbols and the SNR Es /N0 . Examples are presented for various linear modulation schemes in Section 1.4.

22

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

1.3.3 Error and Outage Probability for Flat Fading Channels Ergodic Error Probability For nondispersive channels, the transmitted symbol x is weighted with a complex-valued channel coefficient h and y = hx + n holds. Assuming perfect channel state information (CSI) at the receiver, that is, h is perfectly known, we obtain   Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν | h} = Pr |Y − hXµ |2 > |Y − hXν=µ |2 "  & '2  1 E µ,ν s = · erfc  · |h|2  . 2 2 N0

(1.52)

Therefore, the symbol error probability is itself a random variable depending on the instantaneous channel energy |h|2 . The ergodic symbol error rate can be obtained by calculating the expectation of (1.52) with respect to |h|2 . A convenient way exploits the relationship 1 1 · erfc(x) = · 2 π



π/2

0

+ * x2 dθ exp − 2 sin θ

for

x>0

(1.53)

which can be derived by changing from Cartesian to polar coordinates (Simon and Alouini 2000). Inserting (1.53) into (1.52), reversing the order of integration and performing the substitution s(θ ) = −(µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 / sin2 (θ ) we obtain  1 π/2 p|H|2 (ξ ) π 0 0 * + (µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 dξ dθ × exp −ξ sin2 (θ )   1 π/2 ∞ = exp(ξ s(θ )) · p|H|2 (ξ ) dξ dθ. π 0 0

, -  EH Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν | h} =

∞

(1.54)

The inner integral in (1.54) describes the moment generating function (MGF) ∞ M|H|2 (s) =

p|H|2 (ξ ) · esξ dξ

(1.55)

0

of the random process |H|2 (Papoulis 1965; Simon and Alouini 2000). Using the MGF is a very general concept that will be used again in Section 1.5 when dealing with diversity. For the Rayleigh fading channel, the squared magnitude is chi-squared distributed with two degrees of freedom so that M|H|2 (s) has the form ∞ M|H|2 (s) = 0

1 −ξ/σ 2 sξ 1 H ·e e dξ = . 2 σH 1 − sσH2

(1.56)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

23

Replacing s(θ ) by −(µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 / sin2 (θ ) again, the subsequent integration with respect to θ can be solved in closed-form. It yields for a nondissipative channel with σH2 = 1  , sin2 (θ ) 1 π/2 EH Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν | h} = dθ π 0 sin2 (θ ) + (µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 " # ! (µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 1 . = 1− 2 1 + (µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0

(1.57)

Contrary to (1.51), the error probability does not decrease exponentially but much slower. In Appendix A.3 it is shown that the MGF of H for a Ricean distribution with P = 1 has the form * + sK 1+K . (1.58) · exp M|H|2 (s) = 1+K −s 1+K −s Here, no closed-form expression is available for ,

EH Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν

' &  1 π/2 (µ,ν /2)2 Es /N0 dθ. | h} = M|H|2 − π 0 sin2 (θ )

(1.59)

However, (1.59) can be easily computed numerically with arbitrary precision due to the finite limits of the integral. Equivalent to the procedure for the AWGN channel, the union bound in (1.45) can be applied to obtain an upper bound of the average error probability. A comparison of (1.49) with (1.57) shows that the exponential decay of the error rate for the AWGN channel is replaced by a much lower slope. This can also be observed in Figure 1.16 illustrating the error rate probabilities for a binary antipodal modulation scheme (binary phase shift keying, BPSK) with equiprobable symbols. For small K, the Ricean fading channel behaves similarly to the pure Rayleigh fading channel without an LoS component. With growing K, the LoS component becomes more and more dominating leading finally for K → ∞ to the AWGN case. Principally, fading channels require much higher SNRs than the AWGN channel in order to achieve the same error rates for uncoded systems. Outage Probability For many applications, the ergodic error probability is not the most important parameter. Instead, a certain transmission quality represented by, for example, a target error rate Pt , has to be guaranteed to a predefined percentage. Therefore, the outage probability Pout , that is, the probability that a certain error rate cannot be achieved, is important. For the frequencynonselective Rayleigh fading channel, Pout describes the probability that the instantaneous signal to noise ratio γ = |h|2 · Es /N0 falls below a predefined threshold γt γt Es /N0



Pout = Pr{|H|2 · Es /N0 < γt } = 0

* p|H|2 (ξ ) dξ = 1 − exp −

+ γt . Es /N0

(1.60)

24

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS 10 10

Ps →

10 10 10 10 10

Rice fading for BPSK

0

Rayleigh K=1 K=5 K = 10 K = 100 AWGN

−1

−2

−3

−4

−5

−6

0

10

20 30 Eb /N0 in dB →

40

Figure 1.16 Symbol error probability for BPSK and transmission over AWGN, Rayleigh and Rice fading channels with different Rice factors K

0

10

Pt Pt Pt Pt Pt

−1

Pout →

10

= 10−1 = 10−2 = 10−3 = 10−4 = 10−5

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

0

10

20 30 Es /N0 in dB →

40

Figure 1.17 Outage probability for BPSK, a frequency-nonselective Rayleigh fading channel and different target error rates Pt Hence, the outage probability can be calculated by defining a target error rate Pt , determining the required SNR γt and insert it into (1.60). For a binary antipodal modulation scheme with equiprobable symbols, Figure 1.17 illustrates the outage probability for different target error rates. It can be observed that the higher the quality constraints (low Pt ), the higher the outage probability. For 10 log10 (Es /N0 ) = 20 dB, an error rate of Pt = 10−5 can only be achieved to 91%, that is, Pout ≈ 0.09, while Pt = 10−1 can be ensured to nearly 99.8% (Pout ≈ 8 · 10−3 ). For an outage probability of Pout = 10−2 , a gap of nearly 10 dB exists between Pt = 0.1 and Pt = 10−5 .

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

25

1.3.4 Time-Discrete Matched Filter In Section 1.2.1 on page 10, the matched filter was already mentioned as a time-continuous filter that maximizes the SNR of its sampled output. After deriving a time-discrete channel model in the last section and discussing optimum detection strategies, we now consider the time-discrete matched filter. It provides a sufficient statistics, that is, its output contains the same mutual information as the input and no information is lost (cf. also Chapter 2) (Benedetto and Biglieri 1999). Hence, the optimum detection can still be applied after matched filtering. In order to derive the matched filter in vector notations, we have a look at the general system described in (1.34). It comprises as special cases the transmission over a frequencyselective SISO channel (NI = NO = 1) as well as a MIMO system with flat fading channels (Lt = 1). We are now interested in a receive filter w maximizing the SNR for an isolated symbol, for example, x[k] transmitted at time instant k over a frequency-selective channel.7 Note that this filter does not take into account intersymbol or multilayer interference, but just the ratio of desired signal power and noise power. Therefore, we comprise the Lt coefficients belonging to the channel impulse response into a column vector hk and obtain the Lt × 1 vector yk = hk · x[k] + nk . (1.61) The filter output r[k] = wH · yk = wH · hk · x[k] + wH nk

(1.62)

can be split into the information bearing part wH hk x[k] and a noise part wH nk so that the SNR amounts to .2  .   wH hk EX |x[k]|2 hH EX .wH hk x[k]. k w   . (1.63) SNR = .2  = . H H E H . . w n n w k k N EN w nk   Assuming i.i.d. noise samples with covariance matrix EN nk nH = σN2 · ILt and an average k   2 2 signal power of E |x[k]| = σX , (1.63) becomes SNR =

σX2 wH hk hH k w . · 2 H w w σN

(1.64)

Without loss of generality, we can force the filter w to have unit energy, that is, wH w = 1 holds. With this constraint, we obtain the optimization problem ˜ H hk hH ˜ w = argmax w k w ˜ w

˜ Hw ˜ =1 s.t. w

(1.65)

which can be transformed into an unconstrained problem by using the Lagrange multiplier. In this case, the cost function H L(w, λ) = wH hk hH k w − λ(w w − 1)

(1.66)

7 Equivalently, we can consider symbol x transmitted over the kth transmit antenna in a MIMO system. For k this case, it is shown in Section 1.5 that the matched filter delivers optimum estimates.

26

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

has to be maximized. Setting the partial derivative with respect to wH to zero (∂w/∂wH = 0) yields the eigenvalue problem  ∂L(w, λ) H = hk hH k w − λw = hk hk − λI · w = 0. H ∂w

(1.67)

2 Since hk hH k is a matrix with rank one, only one nonzero eigenvalue λ = hk  exists and the corresponding eigenvector is hk w= . (1.68) hk 

Obviously, the matched filter is simply the Hermitian of the vector hk normalized to unit energy. The resulting signal becomes r[k] =

hH k · yk = h · x[k] + n[k] ˜ hk 

(1.69)

hk hH hk σX2 hH Es · k H k = hk 2 · . 2 N0 hk hk σN

(1.70)

and its SNR amounts to SNR =

For a SISO flat fading channel with a single coefficient hk , the matched filter reduces to a scalar weighting with h∗k /|hk |. Moreover, if real-valued modulation schemes are employed (see next section), the imaginary part of r[k] does not contain any information and r[k] =  Re wH yk represents a sufficient statistic. Sometimes, it is desirable to obtain an unbiased estimate of the information bearing symbol, that is, r[k] = x[k] + n[k] ˜ (cf. Subsection 1.5.1). Hence, the normalization of w with hk  has to be replaced by hk 2 . On the contrary, no normalization may be needed in other scenarios as described in Section 3.1 leading to w = hk . These differences do not affect the structure of the matched filter or the resulting SNR. In a real-world scenario, a sequence of symbols is transmitted over the frequencyselective channel and ISI occurs. The received vector can be described with y = X · h + n,

(1.71)

where y and n are column vectors whose size depends on the length of the transmitted sequence x and X is a convolution matrix set up from x. Extracting that part in X which contains the kth symbol results in yk = Xk · h + nk with



x[k] x[k + 1] .. .

x[k − 1] x[k] .. .

  Xk =   x[k + Lt − 1] x[k + Lt − 2]

(1.72)  · · · x[k − Lt + 1] · · · x[k − Lt + 2]   .. ..  . . ··· x[k]

(1.73)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

27

The matched filter delivers the estimate r[k] = hH · yk = hH · Xk · h + hH nk   L L

= h∗i ·  hj · x[k − i + j ] + n[k + i − 1] j =1

i=1

=

L


|hi |2 · x[k] +

L L



h∗i hj · x[k − i + j ] + n[k]. ˜

(1.74)

i=1 j =1 j =i

i=1

While the SNR ignores the middle term and is still described by (1.70), the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) equals

SINR =

σX2 · σN2 ·

L

/ L

2 2 i=1 |hi | + σX ·

2 i=1 |hi |

02

. .2 . Lt −|i| . ∗ h h . j j +|i| . j =1 i=−Lt +1

Lt −1

(1.75)

i=0

and is not the optimum one. Higher SINRs can be achieved by employing appropriate equalizers (Kammeyer 2004; Proakis 2001). However, optimum detection after matched filtering is still possible, because the matched filter output represents a sufficient statistic.

1.4 Digital Linear Modulation 1.4.1 Introduction The analysis and investigations presented in this book are based on linear digital modulation schemes, that is, the modulator has no memory. Their performances are analyzed in this section for different channels. As before, we always assume perfect lowpass filters gT (t) and gR (t) at the transmitter and the receiver. Therefore, the description focuses on the time-discrete equivalent baseband signal x[k] at the channel input (cf. Figures 1.6 and 1.8). The modulator just performs a simple mapping and extracts m successive bits out of ˜ b(
) and maps the m-tuple b[k] = [b[mk] · · · b[m(k + 1) − 1]], k = l/m, onto one of m M = 2 possible symbols Xµ . They form the signal alphabet X = {X0 , . . . , XM−1 } that depends on the type of modulation. Assuming that all the symbols are equally likely, the agreement in (1.2) delivers the average symbol energy Es = Ts E{|Xµ | } = Ts 2

M−1
µ=0

M−1 Ts
Pr{Xµ } · |Xµ | = |Xµ |2 . M 2

(1.76)

µ=0

Attention has to be paid when modulation schemes with different alphabet sizes are compared. In order to draw a fair comparison, the different numbers of bits per symbol have to be considered. This is done by calculating the performance with respect to the average energy per bit Eb = Es /m. In this case, the SNR is expressed by the measure Eb /N0 rather than Es /N0 .

28

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

In many of today’s communication systems, the modulation type and size are not fixed parameters but are chosen according to instantaneous channel conditions and data rate demands of the users. These adaptive modulation schemes require some kind of channel knowledge at the transmitter. As an example, the SNR can be used to determine the highest possible modulation size under the constraint of a desired error probability. Adaptive modulation schemes are already applied in wireless local area networks (WLAN) using the IEEE 802.11 g standard (Hanzo et al. 2003a) or in the High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) transmission (Blogh and Hanzo 2002; Holma and Toskala 2004) of UMTS. Mapping Strategies While the symbol error rate (following subsections) only depends on the geometrical arrangement of the symbols as well as the SNR, the bit error rate is also affected by ˜ the specific mapping of the m-tuples b[k] onto the symbols Xµ . In many cases, Gray mapping is applied, ensuring that neighboring symbols differ only in one bit. This results in a minimum bit error probability if error events are dominated by mixing up neighboring symbols at the receiver (what is true in most cases). Hence, we obtain a tight approximation Pb ≈

1 Ps . m

(1.77)

Alternatively, natural mapping just enumerates the symbols (e.g. counterclockwise for Phase Shift Keying (PSK), starting with the smallest phase) and assigns them the binary representations of their numbers. For both the mapping strategies, the exact solution of the bit error rate requires the consideration of the specific error probabilities Pr{y ∈ Dµ,ν } between two competing symbols Xµ and Xν and the corresponding number wµ,ν of differing bits concerning their binary presentations. The exact bit error probability has the form

Pb = Pr{Xµ } · wµ,ν · Pr{Y ∈ Dµ,ν }. (1.78) Xν =Xµ

Xµ

1.4.2 Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK) If the amplitude of real-valued symbols bears the information, the modulation is called Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK). Alternatively, it is also termed Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM). In order to have equal distances between neighboring symbols (Figure 1.18), the amplitudes are chosen to Xµ = (2µ + 1 − M) · e

for 0 ≤ µ < M.

The parameter e has to be determined such that the energy constraint in (1.76) is fulfilled leading to " M−1 2 ! Ts
 Es 3 · (1.79) (2µ + 1 − M)e = Es ⇒ e = M M 2 − 1 Ts µ=0

for equally likely symbols. The minimum normalized squared Euclidean distance amounts to 20 =

(2e)2 12 . = 2 Es /Ts M −1

(1.80)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS 4-ASK

29

16-QAM

Im

32-QAM

Im

5e

Im

3e 3e e -3e

-e

e

3e

Re

-3e

-e -e

e e

3e

Re

-5e -3e

-e

e

3e

5e Re

-3e

Figure √ 1.18 Symbol alphabets of linear√amplitude modulation (e = e = Es /Ts /10 for 16-QAM and e = Es /Ts /20 for 32-QAM)

√ Es /Ts /5 for 4-ASK,

Performance for AWGN Channel The symbol error probability, that is, the probability that a wrong symbol is detected at the receiver, can be easily calculated without the union bound. An error occurs if the real part of the noise n
[k] exceeds half of the distance 2e between neighboring symbols. Therefore, the inner sum in (1.51) only has to be evaluated for two adjacent symbols, that is, for the smallest Euclidean distance. While the outermost symbols have only one neighbor that they can be mixed up with, the inner symbols have two competing neighbors. For equiprobable symbols, this fact can be considered by weighting the symbol specific error rates with the number of competing neighbors resulting in a total average weight (2(M − 2) + 2)/M = 2(M − 1)/M. Therefore, (1.80) and the derivation in Section 1.3 yield the average error probability !" # E 3 M − 1 s · erfc · (1.81a) PsM -ASK = M (M 2 − 1) N0 !" # Eb 3m M −1 · erfc · = . (1.81b) M (M 2 − 1) N0 The bit error probabilities can be determined by applying (1.77) or (1.78). Performance for Flat Rayleigh Fading Channel According to the second part of Section 1.3 and the argumentation above, the symbol error probability for a frequency-nonselective Rayleigh fading channel is obtained by applying (1.54) for µ,ν = 0 and appropriate weighting " ! # 3E /N M − 1 s 0 . (1.82) · 1− PsM -ASK = M M 2 − 1 + 3Es /N0 Figure 1.19 shows the results for M-ASK and transmission over an AWGN and a frequency-nonselective Rayleigh fading channel. Obviously, the performance degrades with increasing M due to decreasing Euclidean distances between the symbols for constant

30

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS 10 10

Ps →

10 10 10 10 10

0

M M M M

−1

−2

=2 =4 =8 = 16

−3

−4

−5

−6

0

10

20 30 Eb /N0 in dB →

40

Figure 1.19 Symbol error rates for M-ASK and transmission over an AWGN channel (—) and a frequency-nonselective Rayleigh fading channel (- - -) average signal energy Es . While the error rate shows an exponential decay for the AWGN channel, the slope is nearly linear for the flat Rayleigh fading channel. Therefore, in order to achieve the same average performance for fading channels, the transmit power has to be remarkably higher than that for the AWGN channel. For 2-ASK and Ps = 10−4 , this gap is larger than 25 dB and grows for lower error rates. An appropriate way to bridge this divide is the application of error correcting codes as explained in Chapter 3.

1.4.3 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) For quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), deployed, for example, in WLAN systems (ETSI 2001; Hanzo et al. 2000) and the HSDPA in UMTS (Holma and Toskala 2004), real and imaginary parts of a symbol can be chosen independently from each other. Hence, m
= m/2 bits are mapped onto both real and imaginary symbol parts, according to a
real-valued M
-ASK with M
= 2m . The combination of both parts results in a square arrangement, for example, a 16-QAM with m
= 2 (see Figure 1.18). Adapting the condition in (1.76) to QAM yields








M −1 M −1 M −1
e2

! Es
2
2 2 (2µ + 1 − M ) + (2ν + 1 − M ) = 2e (2µ + 1 − M
)2 = .
M Ts µ=0 ν=0

µ=0

Due to M = M
2 , the parameter e for M-QAM can be calculated to " Es 3 · e= 2(M − 1) Ts

(1.83)

and the minimum squared Euclidean distance is 20 =

(2e)2 6 . = Es /Ts M −1

(1.84)

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

31

Without going into further details, it has to be mentioned that the combinations of ASK and Phase Shift Keying (PSK) are possible. As an example, Figure 1.18 shows the 32-QAM modulation scheme. Performance for AWGN Channel The symbol error √rate for M-QAM can be immediately derived because real and imaginary parts represent M-ASK schemes and can be detected independently. Hence, a correct decision is made if and only if both the components are correctly detected. Since the signal energy Es is equally distributed between real and imaginary parts, we can use (1.81a) with Es |√M -ASK = Es |M -QAM /2 to obtain the error probabilities for both parts. The total error probability for M-QAM becomes & '+ * √ Es /2 2 PsM -QAM = 1 − 1 − Ps M -ASK N0 & ' * √ & '+ √ Es /2 Es /2 2 − Ps M -ASK = 2Ps M -ASK . (1.85) N0 N0 The squared error probability in (1.85) can be neglected for high signal to noise ratios resulting with m
= m/2 in an upper bound !" # √ Es M −1 3 M -QAM erfc Ps 1, it stays at a constant level depending on the actual SNR. For random spreading codes, the spectral efficiency of the optimum receiver performing a joint maximum likelihood decoding of all users was determined as described in Subsection 4.4.2. As expected, it shows the best performance of all multiuser detection techniques. Among the linear receivers, the MF shows only a good performance for very low loads where the background noise dominates the transmission. However, its spectral efficiency increases monotonically with growing β. The decorrelator (ZF) shows near-optimum performance up to a load of approximately η = 0.25. The load with the highest spectral efficiency depends on the SNR because the decorrelator suffers severely from the background noise (cf. Figs 4.45a and b). For loads above this optimum, its performance degrades dramatically and reaches ηZF = 0 below β = 1. The MMSE receiver overcomes the drawback of amplifying the noise and shows the best performance of all linear schemes. However, even the MMSE filter shows a maximum spectral efficiency for finite load and degrades beyond this optimum. A large gap remains between linear and nonlinear techniques, especially for the MF even with optimum channel coding. Therefore, the next chapter focuses not only on linear but also on nonlinear multiuser detection strategies that jointly process all user signals.

CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS

225

4.5 Summary This chapter has introduced CDMA systems. They incorporate spread spectrum techniques like DS spreading that multiply the signal’s bandwidth. Owing to spectral spreading, a certain robustness against the frequency selectivity of mobile radio channels is achieved. With appropriately designed spreading codes, the MF called Rake receiver represents an efficient and powerful structure. For multiuser scenarios, the detrimental effect of MUI that degrades the system performance remarkably when using a simple Rake receiver has been demonstrated. Moreover, the difference between principles of uplink and downlink transmissions was explained. Furthermore, some families of appropriate spreading codes such as Walsh-Hadamard codes, m-sequences, and Gold codes, as well as their correlation properties have been discussed. In Section 4.2, the combination of orthogonal FDMA (OFDM) and CDMA was derived. Explaining first the principles of OFDM, OFDM-CDMA systems have been analyzed in more detail. Especially, the advantage of a simple channel equalization for the downlink that partially restores the orthogonality of spreading codes illustrated the attractiveness of OFDM-CDMA. Next, low-rate coding in CDMA systems was investigated. Owing to the inherent spreading in CDMA systems, which is mainly done by repetition coding and scrambling, there is a lot of space for powerful low-rate codes that partially replace the repetition code. It was shown that the error rate performance can be significantly improved by choosing appropriate codes even under severe MUI. Especially, the parallel concatenated super-orthogonal codes exhibit an amazing performance. However, the final examination of the capacities clearly illustrated that a single MF even with a capacity achieving error correction code leads to a poor overall system capacity so that powerful multiuser detection strategies will be discussed in the next chapter.

5

Multiuser Detection in CDMA Systems In this chapter, the uplink of a coded DS-CDMA system in which a common base station has to detect all incoming signals is considered. This is a major difference compared to the downlink where the mobile generally knows only its own spreading code and is interested only in its own signal. This requires the application of blind or semiblind multiuser detection (MUD) techniques (Honig and Tsatsanis 2000) that is not the focus of this work. A comparison with the detection algorithms for multilayer space-time transmission (B¨ohnke et al. 2003; Foschini et al. 1999; Golden et al. 1998; W¨ubben et al. 2001) presented in Chapter 6 demonstrates the strong equivalence of CDMA systems and multiple antenna systems when used for multilayer transmission. The next section starts with optimum MUD strategies. Since they are generally infeasible for practical implementations, linear joint detection techniques are derived in Section 5.2. Efficient approximations are obtained with multistage detectors such as iterative parallel and successive interference cancellation (SIC) schemes. A further performance improvement is derived in Section 5.3 by exploiting the discrete nature of the signal alphabet leading to nonlinear iterative MUD algorithms. Finally, the combination of linear joint detection and nonlinear interference cancellation is discussed in Section 5.4. The chapter closes with a summary of the main results.

5.1 Optimum Detection With regard to the uplink, each user maps a word du consisting of k information bits by  = b [0] · · · bu appropriate forward error correction (FEC) encoding onto a code word b u u  [n − 1] . After subsequent linear phase shift keying (PSK) or quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) modulation delivering the sequence au , each symbol au [
] is spread with a spreading code cu [
]. Since we look at the generally asynchronous uplink, random spreading codes are assumed. In short code CDMA systems, cu [
] is independent of the time index
while it varies from symbol to symbol in long code systems. The obtained sequence xu Wireless Communications over MIMO Channels Volker K¨uhn  2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

228

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

is transmitted over the individual channel with impulse response hu [
]. At the receiver, that is, a common base station, all transmitted signals are superimposed and additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) n is added resulting in y = H · x + n = S · a + n.

(5.1)

  In (5.1), H = Th1 , . . . , ThNu represents a concatenation of several user-specific convolution matrices Thu (Kammeyer 2004) that cover all time instants of the considered sequence.  T The vector x = xT1 , . . . , xTNu comprises the spread sequences of all users. According to (4.4) on page 176, the convolution of spreading code cu [
] and channel impulse response hu [
] can be expressed by the signature su [
]. This leads to the second part of (5.1) where S comprises the signatures of all users and a the modulated symbols (cf. Section 4.1.2).

5.1.1 Optimum Joint Sequence Detection In this section, we assume perfect knowledge of the channel impulse responses and the spreading codes. As already mentioned in Section 1.3, the optimum detector performs a joint maximum a posteriori detection including FEC decoding for all users based on the received sequence y. Mathematically, this can be expressed by ˜ dˆ map = argmax Pr{d˜ | S, y} = argmax pY|d,S ˜ (y) · Pr{d}, d˜

(5.2)

d˜

where the second equality is obtained by applying the Bayes rule and exploiting the fact that pY|S (y) is independent of the hypothesis d˜ and, therefore, does not affect the decision. As already explained in Section 1.3, the hypotheses d˜ are generally uniformly distributed ˜ are not known a priori at the receiver. In these cases, Pr{d} ˜ is not or the probabilities Pr{d} available and the joint maximum likelihood detector has to be applied dˆ mld = argmax pY|d,S ˜ (y).

(5.3)

d˜

The conditional probability density function in (5.3) has the form /    0 1 ˜ H −1 y − S · a(d) ˜ pY|d,S · exp − y − S · a(d) ˜ (y) = N N det(π N N )

(5.4)

˜ denotes the modulated sequence associated with the hypothesis d. ˜ Inserting where a(d) ˜ (5.4) into (5.3), neglecting all terms independent of the hypothesis d, and applying the natural logarithm, we obtain with N N = σN2 I !    # ˜ H y − Sa(d) ˜ y − Sa(d) mld = argmax log exp − dˆ σN2 d˜ 5 5 ˜ 52 . = argmin 5y − S · a(d) (5.5) d˜

From (5.5), we recognize that the joint maximum likelihood detector searches for that hypothesis d˜ which minimizes the squared Euclidian distance between the received sequence ˜ Since d consists of discrete values, gradient-based methods cannot be y and S · a(d).

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

229

applied and an exhaustive search is necessary. Obviously, even for medium-sized systems the required computational complexity is far too high for practical implementations because it grows exponentially with the number of users as well as the lengths of the sequences. Contrary to the joint detection, each user can also be individually detected (Verdu 1998). Individual MAP detection of a certain user u can be expressed by = argmax Pr{d˜ u | S, y} = argmax pY|d˜ u ,S (y) · Pr{d˜ u }. dˆ map u d˜ u

(5.6)

d˜ u

Equivalently to (5.3), the individual ML detector is obtained by dˆ mld u = argmax pY|d˜ u ,S (y).

(5.7)

d˜ u

Individual and joint detections do not always lead to the same result as described in (5.2), which has already been illustrated by the simple example on page 19.

5.1.2 Joint Preprocessing and Subsequent Separate Decoding The first step toward a reduced complexity receiver is to separate FEC decoding and MUD. To exploit as much information as possible, a hard decision multiuser detector must be avoided. Instead, the joint preprocessor should deliver log-likelihood ratios L(bˆu [
] | y) of the coded bits bu [
] for each user u that can be directly processed by the FEC decoders. For the sake of notational simplicity, we restrict to synchronous single carrier CDMA systems in frequency-nonselective environments and OFDM-CDMA systems for frequencyselective channels assuming a coarse synchronization (K¨uhn 2003) (cf. Section 4.2). In these scenarios, the system matrix S is block diagonal and can be split into several Ns × Nu matrices S[
]. Hence, symbol-wise preprocessing is optimal and we omit the time variable
. However, the derivation can generally be extended to the asynchronous case. Furthermore, we consider only binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation so that no soft-output demodulation is required.1 In this case, bu ∈ {0, 1} and au ∈ {+1, −1} can be used equivalently. The resulting structure is shown in Figure 5.1. Each transmitter consists of an FEC encoder including the BPSK mapping and a user-specific interleaver u (Bruck et al. 2000). Spreading with the codes cu [
] and the transmission over the channels hu [
] are embraced in the blocks denoted by the signatures su [
]. Finally, the received signal y[
] is obtained by summing up all transmit signals and the background noise n[
]. At the receiver, the processing for y = y[
] at time instant
starts with the calculation of the log-likelihood ratios L(aˆ u | y) = log

pY|au =+1 (y) · Pr{au = +1} Pr{au = +1 | y} = log Pr{au = −1 | y} pY|au =−1 (y) · Pr{au = −1}

(5.8)

= L(y | aˆ u ) + La (au ). 1 In the case of QPSK, a soft-output demodulator demultiplexes inphase and quadrature components into a single data stream. For M-ary modulation schemes with M > 4, appropriate soft-output demodulation algorithms have to be employed.

230

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS n[
] L(a1 [
] | y[
])

d1 [i] FEC a1 [
] 1 enc.

cc

s1 [
] y[
]

dNu [i]

aNu [
]

FEC enc.

Nu

joint preprocessor

−1 1

L(aNu [
] | y[
]) −1 Nu

sNu [
]

ˆ FEC d1 [i] dec.

FEC dec.

dˆNu [i]

Figure 5.1 CDMA system with joint preprocessing and individual FEC decoding

Extending au in the numerator and denominator of L(y | aˆ u ) to a and summing up all possible combinations of aν=u yields with N N = σN2 · INs

a,au =+1 pY|a (y) ·

Pr{a}

a,au =−1 pY|a (y) ·

Pr{a}

L(aˆ u | y) = log

 − y − S · a2 /σN2 · Pr{a}   . = log 2 2 a,au =−1 exp − y − S · a /σN · Pr{a}

a,au =+1 exp



(5.9)

The probabilities Pr{a} in (5.9) are generally not known a priori so that they are not considered for the moment. However, we will come back to them when talking about iterative schemes. Performing some manipulations on the squared magnitudes in the numerator and denominator and dropping all terms that do not depend on a results in   −y − S · a2 ⇒ 2 · Re aH · SH · y − aH · SH · S · a   = 2 · Re aH · r − aH · R · a. (5.10) We recognize that the matched filtered signal r = SH · y is correlated with the hypothesis a. In the case of BPSK, a and r
= Re SH · y are real-valued and (5.10) simplifies to −y − S · a2

⇒

2aT r
− aT R
a

(5.11)

with R
= Re {R}. The output of the matched filter represents a sufficient statistics, that is, it contains the same mutual information as the channel output y, and subsequent processing stages can still provide optimal log-likelihood ratios. We obtain  T
 2 T
a,au =+1 exp 2a r − a R a /(2σN
)
  . L(r | aˆ u ) = log (5.12) 2 T
T
a,au =−1 exp 2a r − a R a /(2σN
) Obviously, the computational complexity still depends exponentially on the number of users (and the alphabet size). A modest complexity reduction can be achieved by applying the

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

231

already known approximation of (3.70) resulting in L(r
| aˆ u ) ≈

  1 · max 2aT r
− aT R
a 2 a,a =+1 2σN
u −

(5.13)

  1 · max 2aT r
− aT R
a . 2 a,a =−1 2σN
u

5.1.3 Turbo Detection with Joint Preprocessing and Separate Decoding In the next step, individual de-interleaving and FEC decoding is performed. According to the turbo-principle, it is possible to give feedback information to the preprocessor so that an iterative process arises (Hagenauer 1996a; Lampe and Huber 2002; Reed et al. 1998). If soft-output decoding algorithms like the (BCJR) algorithm explained in Section 3.4.3 are employed in delivering the LLRs L(aˆ u ) = La (au ), these LLRs can be used to calculate a priori probabilities eLa (au )/2 · eau La (au )/2 (5.14) Pr{au } = 1 + eLa (au ) that can be inserted into (5.9). Because of individual interleavers, the LLRs La (au ) are assumed to be statistically independent so that Pr{a} =

Nu 7 eLa (au )/2 · eau La (au )/2 1 + eLa (au )

(5.15)

u=1

holds. Using the results for BPSK from (5.11) and inserting (5.15) into (5.9) results in   2 ) N 2aT r
−aT R
a /(2σN eLa (aµ )/2 aµ La (aµ )/2 u
· µ=1 e a,au =+1 e 1+eLa (aµ )   L(aˆ u | r) = log 2  T
T
L (a )/2 2a r −a R a /(2σN
) e a µ u aµ La (aµ )/2 · N a,au =−1 e µ=1 1+eLa (aµ ) e   2 )+ Nu a L (a )/2 2aT r
−aT R
a /(2σN
µ=1 µ a µ a,au =+1 e   = log . (5.16) 2 )+ Nu a L (a )/2 2aT r
−aT R
a /(2σN
µ=1 µ a µ a,au =−1 e The terms eLa (aµ )/2 /(1 + eLa (aµ ) ) are independent of the hypotheses a within the summations and, therefore, are identical in the numerator and denominator so that they can be cancelled. Furthermore, the u-th contribution in the inner sums of numerator and denominator in (5.16) is constant due to the restrictions of the outer summations over a with au = +1 or au = −1. Hence, we can extract the common factor exp[La (au )] from the ratio and obtain (5.17a) L(aˆ u | r) = La (au ) + Le (aˆ u ) with Le (aˆ u ) = log



a,au =+1 e a,au =−1 e





Nu





Nu

2 )+ 2aT r
−aT R
a /(2σN
2 )+ 2aT r
−aT R
a /(2σN


µ=1 aµ La (aµ )/2 µ=u µ=1 aµ La (aµ )/2 µ=u

.

(5.17b)

232

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

The approximation already known from (5.13) becomes 



 2aT r
− aT R
a 1 L(aˆ u | r) ≈ La (au ) + max  + a,au =+1  2 2σN2


Nu
µ=1 µ=u

 aµ La (aµ )  

Nu  2aT r
− aT R
a 1
 + aµ La (aµ ) − max   . 2 a,au =−1 2 2σN


(5.18)

µ=1 µ=u

The receiver structure depicted in Figure 5.2 illustrates how to calculate the solutions presented in (5.16) and (5.18). In the first iteration, no a priori information is available and only the terms given in (5.11) have to be calculated. They remain constant during subsequent iteration steps and are to be determined only once. After having performed the FEC decoding for the first time, the LLRs La (bu ) can be used as a priori information according to (5.15) to improve the estimates L(aˆ u | r). As already mentioned, the complexity of the joint preprocessor still grows exponentially with the number of users while the decoding part depends linearly on Nu . For a small OFDM-CDMA system with a spreading factor Ns = 4, some results are shown in Figure 5.3. They have been obtained for a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel with uniform power delay profile and random spreading codes. A half-rate convolutional code with Lc = 3 and generators g1 = 58 , g2 = 78 was employed. At the receiver, perfect LLRs from (5.16) as well as for the approximation of (5.18) have been used. Obviously, the error rate can be significantly reduced with the second iteration. Subsequent iterations not shown here do not lead to substantial additional improvements because we are already close to the single-user bound (SUB). This lower bound is reached at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 7 dB for β = 1 as well as β = 2. Only for small SNRs, the La (a1 )

cc y

Le (aˆ 1 )

1 −1 1

SISO decoder

−1 Nu

SISO decoder

dˆ1

joint preprocessor Le (aˆ Nu )

La (aNu )

dˆNu

Nu

Figure 5.2 Turbo receiver for joint preprocessing and individual FEC decoding

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

BER →

10 10 10 10 10

a) β = 1

0

SUB perf. LLR app. LLR

−1

SUB perf. LLR app. LLR

−1

10

−2

−3

−4

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

−5

0

b) β = 2

0

10

BER →

10

233

−5

2

4 6 8 Eb /N0 in dB →

10

10

0

2

4 6 8 Eb /N0 in dB →

10

Figure 5.3 Performance of optimum multiuser detection with subsequent decoding for the first two iterations (first iteration: ◦ and ×, second iteration:  and +) loss compared with the SUB amounts to 0.2 dB for β = 1 and 0.5 dB for β = 2. Moreover, the approximate solution (× and +) performs nearly as well as the optimum solution.

5.2 Linear Multiuser Detection A further reduction of the computational complexity can be achieved by applying only linear joint preprocessing. A common property of all linear techniques is that they do not exploit the knowledge of the finite signal alphabet but assume continuously distributed transmit signals. Therefore, we have only a polynomial complexity with respect to the number of active users instead of an exponential relationship. The following approaches are related to simple linear algebra, that is, the linear equation system y = Sa + n has to be solved with respect to a, that is, we look for a matrix W with aˆ = W · y. For simplicity, we first restrict to the uncoded case and the system matrix S consists of Nu columns and Ns rows.

5.2.1 Decorrelator (Zero-Forcing, ZF) First, we consider the decorrelator being equivalent to the zero-forcing (ZF) equalizer (Honig and Tsatsanis 2000; Moshavi 1996). It searches for the unconstrained vector a˜ ZF ∈ CNu that minimizes the squared Euclidean distance to the received vector y according to 52 5 a˜ ZF = argmin 5y − S˜a5 . (5.19) a˜ ∈CNu

The multiplication of a˜ ZF with S leads to the best reconstruction of y. Although (5.19) looks very similar to the maximum likelihood solution, the search space is not restricted to a finite alphabet (unconstrained) but comprises the entire Nu -dimensional space of complex numbers. Therefore, the final detection requires a scalar hard decision aˆ ZF = Q(˜aZF ) of the soft values in a˜ ZF . Nevertheless, the decorrelator represents the joint maximum likelihood

234

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

detector for continuously distributed signal alphabets. Without the exploitation of the finite signal space there is no combinatorial problem and the optimization is solved by setting the derivative of the squared Euclidean distance in (5.19) with respect to a˜ H , to zero. With the relation ∂ a˜ /∂ a˜ H = 0 (Fischer 2002), we obtain the Wirtinger derivative H  ∂  ∂  y − S˜a · y − S˜a = H yH y − yH S˜a − a˜ H SH y + a˜ H SH S˜a H ∂ a˜ ∂ a˜ !

= −SH y + SH S˜a = 0

(5.20)

whose solution is obviously (Verdu 1998)  H −1 H a˜ ZF = WH · S · y = R−1 · r (5.21) ZF · y = S S  H −1 with WZF = S · S S . We recognize that the decorrelator starts again with a bank of matched filters (multiplying y with SH ). Afterwards, the intermediate results in r are decorrelated with R−1 , that is, the correlations between the matched filter outputs are removed. If S consists of linear independent columns which are generally fulfilled for Nu ≤ Ns , the correlation matrix R = SH S has full rank and its inverse exists. Inserting the structure of y into (5.21) leads to  a˜ ZF = R−1 SH · Sa + n = a + R−1 SH · n = a + WH (5.22) ZF · n. The output of the decorrelator consists of the desired symbol vector a and a modified noise term. Therefore, as already mentioned in Section 4.4.3, the interference can be totally suppressed. However, the background noise is multiplied with the inverse of the correlation matrix R leading, especially for high loads β, to a strong noise amplification and, hence, to low SNRs. This drawback is also indicated by the error covariance matrix ,  H ZF = E a˜ ZF − a a˜ ZF − a ,  H  H H = WH n − a a + W n − a WZF = E a + WH ZF ZF ZF E nn 2 −1 H −1 = σN2 WH = σN2 R−1 . ZF WZF = σN R S SR

(5.23)

It contains on its diagonal, the mean squared error (MSE) for each user and equals the inverse of the correlation matrix R multiplied with the noise power σN2 . Real-Valued Modulation Schemes For real-valued modulation schemes such as BPSK or M-ary amplitude shift keying (ASK), significant improvements can be achieved by the following modification. Since we know that real symbols have been transmitted, only the real part of the matched filter outputs  r
= Re SH y  is of interest. Consequently, the inverse has to be determined only from R
= Re SH S and we obtain  −1   · Re SH · y = R
−1 · r
. a˜ ZF = Re SH S

(5.24)

The advantage of (5.24) becomes obvious when the received signal is described only by real matrices. Splitting up real and imaginary parts doubles the sizes of all vectors and

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS matrices leading to *
+ *
S y yr =

=

y S

+ *
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ −S

a n S n
· + = · a = S˜ r a
+ nr . + S
a

n

S

n



235

(5.25)

Since a

= 0 holds for real-valued modulation schemes, only the first Nu columns of the real-valued system matrix influence the channel output. This halves the effective interference so that S˜ r is better conditioned than S and the background noise is less amplified. Moore-Penrose Pseudo Inverse Next, we have to discuss the case when R is singular and its inverse does not exist. Since we assume binary spreading codes, this situation occurs for Nu > Ns and requires the pseudo inverse or Moore-Penrose inverse. It is obtained from the singular-value decomposition of S (Golub and van Loan 1996) (see also Appendix C) + + * * 2 0 0 H 0 0 H H V U = UUH , ⇒ R=U (5.26) S = UV = U 0 0 0 0 where U ∈ CNs ×Ns and V ∈ CNu ×Nu are unitary matrices. The diagonal matrix  0 contains all nonzero singular values of S. With this definition, we obtain the pseudo inverses that also include the nonsingular case

 −1 + * −1 SH S SH rank(S) = Nu 0 H 0 † † H U = (5.27a) S = V U = V  −1 0 0 SH SSH rank(S) = Ns and

* −2  † 0 R = SH S = V 0 †

 −1 + SH S rank(S) = Nu 0 H V =  H −2 H 0 S SS S rank(S) = Ns .

(5.27b)

† Using (5.27a) and (5.27b), we obtain the general result WH ZF = S .

Near-Far Scenarios In scenarios with near-far effects (cf. page 183), the received signal can be expressed as y = SP1/2 a + n. The corresponding decorrelating filter is −1/2 † S , WH ZF = P

(5.28)

that is, it consists of the already known decorrelator S† with successive scalar weighting of the filter outputs. Since the decorrelator totally removes the interference, weak users do not suffer from strong users and the decorrelator is called near-far resistant. Figure 5.4a shows the bit error rate (BER) performance of the decorrelator for BPSK. Although the multiple access interference can be totally suppressed, the performance degrades with increased load. Only for very low β the SUB can be reached. The reason for this behavior is the amplification of the background noise that becomes larger with growing load. For β = 2, a reliable transmission is not possible. However, except for low SNR and extremely high loads, the decorrelator performs better than the simple matched filter represented by dashed lines.

236

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS 10

a) error rate versus Es /N0

0

b) error rate versus β

0

10

0 dB 10

−1

−1

10

10 10 10 10

−3

−4

−5

0

Nu= 2 Nu= 16 Nu= 32 Nu= 48 Nu= 64 SUB 4 8 12 16 Eb /N0 in dB →

BER →

BER →

5 dB −2

−2

10

10 dB −3

10

−4

15 dB

10

20 dB

−5

20

10

0

0.5

1 β→

1.5

2

Figure 5.4 Error rate performance of decorrelator for different loads and uncoded OFDMCDMA system with BPSK, processing gain Gp = 32, and 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (dashed lines: matched filter) This can also be observed in Figure 5.4b showing the error rate performance versus β for different SNRs Es /N0 . While the error rate degrades dramatically for the matched filter even for moderate loads, the BER increases more slowly for the decorrelator. Nevertheless, the noise amplification leads to a weak performance at high SNRs, the error rate approaches 0.5 when β tends to 2. It has to be emphasized that the example assumes independent fading channels for all users (see uplink transmission in Section 4.2) so that the interference is distributed in the complex plane. Since we use real-valued BPSK, only half of the interference power affects the transmission. Otherwise, the error rate of 0.5 would have already been reached for β = 1. Figure 5.5 compares the performance of the decorrelator with that of a simple matched filter. It depicts the gain Eb /N0 |MF (5.29) γZF−MF = 10 log10 Eb /N0 |ZF of the decorrelator for different target error rates Pt , that is, the logarithmic ratio of required SNRs to achieve the bit error rate Pt . Obviously, γZF−MF grows with β and the slope becomes higher for low target error rates. Note that the matched filter cannot reach certain target error rates if the load is too high, resulting in infinite large gains. For small SNRs and if β approaches 2, the decorrelator performs worse than the matched filter as can be seen from Figure 5.4.

5.2.2 Minimum Mean Squared Error Receiver (MMSE) So far, we considered two extreme linear detectors: The matched filter in Chapter 4 that addresses only the background noise and, therefore, suffers severely from multiuser interference and the decorrelator of the preceding section that concentrates only on the interference neglecting the influence of the noise. A compromise between both is obtained with the

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

237

10

Pt Pt Pt Pt

γZF−MF in dB

8

= 10−1 = 5 · 10−2 = 10−2 = 5 · 10−3

6 4 2 0 0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

β→ Figure 5.5 Gain of decorrelator compared to MF for different loads and uncoded OFDMCDMA system with BPSK and 4-path Rayleigh fading channel minimum mean squared error (MMSE) detector WMMSE minimizing the average squared Euclidean distance between the estimate a˜ MMSE = WH MMSE · y and the true data vector a. ,5 5 5W B H y − a52 . aˆ MMSE = WH (5.30) MMSE · y with WMMSE = argmin E B CNu ×Ns W∈

Again, a solution of the problem defined in (5.30) is found by setting the partial derivative of B H /∂ W B =0 ˜ to zero. With the relation ∂ W the squared Euclidean distance with respect to W, (Fischer 2002), we obtain    H ∂ B H y − a)H B y − a)(W E tr (W B ∂W 2 1 ∂ B −W B H Y A − A Y W B + A A B H Y Y W = tr W B ∂W ! B H Y Y − A Y = 0 =W

(5.31)

leading to the well-known Wiener solution −1 WH MMSE = A Y · Y Y .

(5.32)

To determine the covariance matrices in (5.32), some general assumptions are made that are fulfilled in most practical communication systems. First, the AWGN channel adds white noise, that is, successive noise samples are uncorrelated. Second, the data symbols au of different users are statistically independent. Furthermore, the data symbols are independent from the noise samples leading to the following set of equations. N N = E{nnH } = σN2 · INs

(5.33a)

A A = E{aaH } = σA2 · INu

(5.33b)

A N = E{anH } = 0.

(5.33c)

238

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

These results deliver the covariance matrix of the received samples Y Y = E{yyH } = SA A SH + N N = σA2 · SSH + σN2 · INs

(5.34)

and the crosscovariance matrix A Y = E{ayH } = A A SH + A N = σA2 · SH .

(5.35)

Inserting (5.34) and (5.35) into (5.32), we obtain the MMSE filter  2 H −1  H σN2 −1 2 H 2 H WH = σ S SS + σ I = S σ SS + 2 INs N MMSE A A N s σA which can be shown to be equivalent to2 ! #−1 '−1 & σN2 N0 H H H WMMSE = S S + 2 INu ·S = R+ IN · SH . Es u σA

(5.36)

(5.37)

Analyzing the result in (5.37), we see that the MMSE detector starts like the decorrelator with a matched filter bank. Moreover, WMMSE represents a compromise between matched filter and decorrelator. For σN2 → 0, that is, infinitely large SNR, the identity matrix in the inverse is cancelled and we obtain the decorrelator in (5.21) suppressing the interference perfectly. On the contrary, the identity matrix dominates the inverse for σN2 → ∞ so that R can be neglected. In this case, we simply obtain the matched filter that addresses only the noise (M¨uller 1998). The MMSE detector does not suppress the multiuser interference perfectly and some residual interference still disturbs the transmission. Moreover, the estimate is biased. The error covariance matrix with (5.1) and (5.37) now becomes ,  H MMSE = E a˜ MMSE − a a˜ MMSE − a  ! #−1  ! #−1 2 2 σ σ N N R = σN2 R + 2 INu . (5.38) = σA2 INu − R + 2 INu σA σA The normalized MSE per user can be easily calculated and amounts to  ! #−1  2 σ 1 1  σN2  tr [MMSE ] = tr UUH + N2 INu Nu σA2 Nu σA2 σA =

rank(S) 1
N0 /Es , Nu λµ + N0 /Es

(5.39)

µ=1

where λµ denotes the µ-th nonzero eigenvalue of the correlation matrix R. Hence, the average error depends on the singular-value distribution of S. For large SNR Es /N0 → ∞, the error diminishes; for Es /N0 → 0, it becomes 1. 2 A simple way to derive (5.37) is to start with a matched filter bank and minimizing WH SH y − a2 = WH r − a2 .

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

239

Real-Valued Modulation Schemes Looking again at a BPSK transmission, the performance can be improved by concentrating on the important real parts. Similar to the derivation for the decorrelator we obtain '−1 & N0 a˜ MMSE = R
+ INu · r
. (5.40) 2Es Note that the noise power in (5.40) is halved compared to the complex-valued case! Near-Far Scenarios In near-far scenarios, the MMSE filter has to be adapted to the different power levels among the users (Feuers¨anger and K¨uhn 2001). Substituting S with SP1/2 , it becomes  −1 WMMSE = P1/2 SH SPSH + σN2 INs (5.41a)  −1 (5.41b) = P1/2 SH SP + σN2 INu SH . From (5.41a) and (5.41b), we observe that the power levels affect the behavior of the MMSE filter. If the SNR grows without bound, the influence of the background noise vanishes and the MMSE filter concentrates on the interference suppression. Hence, the MMSE detector approaches the decorrelator, and is asymptotically near-far resistant (Verdu 1998). However, for finite SNR weak users suffer more from strong users than in the case of the decorrelator, that is, near-far resistance is not generally given. Figure 5.6a shows the BER performance of the MMSE detector for an OFDM-CDMA system and a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel. Similar to the decorrelator, performance degrades for increased system load β. However, the comparison with the decorrelator in Figure 5.6b illustrates that the degradation is much smaller than for the ZF solution. The

10

a) error rate versus Es /N0

0

b) error rate versus β

0

10

0 dB

10 10 10 10

−1

−1

10

−2

−3

−4

−5

0

β≈0 β = 0.5 β=1 β = 1.5 β=2 SUB 4 8 12 16 Eb /N0 in dB →

BER →

BER →

10

5 dB

−2

10

10 dB

−3

10

−4

10

15 dB 20 dB

−5

20

10

0

0.5

1 β→

1.5

2

Figure 5.6 Error rate performance of MMSE filter for different loads and OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (dashed line: decorrelator)

240

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS 6

Pt Pt Pt Pt

γZF−MF in dB

5 4

= 10−1 = 10−2 = 10−3 = 10−4

3 2 1 0 0

0.5

1 β→

1.5

2

Figure 5.7 Gain of MMSE filter compared to decorrelator for different loads and an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with BPSK and 4-path Rayleigh fading channel MMSE filter outperforms the decorrelator for all loads β and all SNRs and the gain grows with the system load. This is also confirmed by Figure 5.7. Concluding, we can state that linear MUD techniques reduce multiple access interference efficiently. Especially, the MMSE filter outperforms the simple matched filter for all SNRs. Although the computational complexity of the described linear detectors is much lower than that of the optimum multiuser detector, it still grows cubically with the system size. Hence, calculating the pseudo inverse of S becomes a demanding task for large systems. The next subsections describe some iterative schemes approximating the ZF and MMSE solutions with lower computational costs.

5.2.3 Linear Parallel Interference Cancellation (PIC) By calculating the pseudo inverse of the system matrix S, we basically solve a linear equation system. From linear algebra (Golub and van Loan 1996) we know that the solution can be obtained iteratively. Starting with a matched filter bank, we have to process the signal (5.42) r = Ra + SH n ⇒ a˜ = WH · r ⇔ M · a˜ = r. Instead of looking in (5.42) for a matrix W that leads to a good estimate a˜ , we can describe the problem as solving the linear equation system M · a˜ = r. The matrix M will be determined later. A single row of this linear equation system can be presented in the form Nu u−1

ru = Mu,u a˜ u + Mu,v a˜ v + Mu,v a˜ v , (5.43) v=1

v=u+1

that is, the received value ru consists of the superposition of the scaled desired symbol a˜ u and the weighted interfering symbols a˜ v=u . An iterative solution of the equation system is obtained by using the weighted matched filter outputs of the interfering symbols as initial

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

r1

a˜ 1(0)

−1 M1,1

Nu

Mcc ˜ u(0) 1,u a

u=2

241

a˜ 1(1)

Nu

−1 M1,1

M1,u a˜ u(1)

u=2

a˜ 1(2) −1 M1,1

y matched filter bank rNu

a˜ N(0)u

MN−1u ,Nu

N u −1 u=1

MNu ,u a˜ u(0)

a˜ N(1)u

a˜ N(2)u

N u −1

MN−1u ,Nu

u=1

MNu ,u a˜ u(1)

MN−1u ,Nu

second stage

first stage

Figure 5.8 Structure of multistage detector for iterative parallel interference cancellation soft estimates aˆ v(0) =u = rv=u /Mv,v . Subtracting them from ru leads to an improved estimate (1) a˜ u after the first iteration. The interference cancellation is simultaneously applied to all (µ) users and repeated with updated estimates a˜ u in subsequent iterations. In the µ-th iteration, the u-th symbol becomes 3 4 Nu u−1

−1 a˜ u(µ) = Mu,u · ru − Mu,v a˜ v(µ−1) − Mu,v a˜ v(µ−1) . (5.44) v=1

v=u+1

The simultaneous application of (5.44) for all symbols au , 1 ≤ u ≤ Nu , is also called Jacobi algorithm and known as linear parallel interference cancellation (PIC). An implementation leads directly to a multistage detector depicted in Figure 5.8 (Honig and Tsatsanis 2000; Moshavi 1996). Several identical modules highlighted by the gray shaded areas are serially concatenated. Each module represents one iteration step so that we need m stages for m iterations. The choice of the matrix M determines the kind of detector that is approximated. For M = R, we approximate the decorrelator, and the coefficients Mu,v = Ru,v used in (5.44) equal the elements of the correlation matrix. The MMSE filter is approximated for M = R + σN2 /σA2 · INu . Hence, the diagonal elements of M have to be replaced with Mu,u = Ru,u + N0 /Es . Convergence Behavior of Decorrelator Approximation The convergence properties of this iterative algorithm depend on the eigenvalue distribution of M. Therefore, (5.44) is described using vector notations. The matrix A = diag(diag(R)) is diagonal and contains the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix R. The PIC approximating the decorrelator delivers −1 ·r a˜ (0) ZF = A 1  2    −1 −1/2 r − R − A a˜ (0) INu − A−1/2 R − A A−1/2 A−1/2 r a˜ (1) ZF = A ZF = A

242 a˜ (2) ZF

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS 1 2  = A−1 r − R − A a˜ (1) ZF * +  −1/2 / −1/2  −1/2 02 −1/2 −1/2 −1/2 INu − A A =A + A r R−A A R−A A .. .

−1/2 a˜ (m) ZF = A

m
 −1/2  µ A A − R A−1/2 A−1/2 r.

(5.45)

µ=0

The output after the m-th iteration in (5.45) represents the m-th order Taylor series approximation of R−1 (M¨uller and Verdu 2001). Rewriting it with the normalized correlation ¯ = A−1/2 RA−1/2 yields matrix R −1/2 a˜ (m) ZF = A

m


¯ µ A−1/2 r. INu − R

(5.46)

µ=0

This series only converges to the true inverse of R if the magnitudes of all eigenvalues of ¯ are smaller than 1. This condition is equivalent to λmax (R) ¯ < 2. Since λmax tends INu − R √ asymptotically to (1 + β)2 (M¨uller 1998), we obtain an approximation of the maximum load below which the Jacobi algorithm will converge. √ NU,max < ( 2 − 1)2 ≈ 0.17. (5.47) βmax = Ns Obviously, the Jacobi algorithm or, equivalently, the linear PIC converges toward the true decorrelator only for very low loads. Hence, this technique is not suited for highly loaded systems. Convergence Behavior of MMSE Approximation According to the last section, we have to replace the diagonal matrix A with the matrix D = A + σN2 /σA2 INu to approximate the MMSE detector. With this substitution, we obtain the following estimates after different iterations. −1 ·r a˜ (0) MMSE = D 1  (0) 2 −1 r − R − A a˜ MMSE a˜ (1) = D MMSE    = D−1/2 INu − D−1/2 R − A D−1/2 D−1/2 r 1  (1) 2 −1 r − R − A a˜ MMSE a˜ (2) = D MMSE * +  −1/2 / −1/2  −1/2 02 −1/2 −1/2 −1/2 INu − D D =D + D r R−A D R−A D

.. . −1/2 a˜ (m) MMSE = D

m
 −1/2  µ D A − R D−1/2 D−1/2 r. µ=0

(5.48)

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

243

To determine the convergence properties concerning the MMSE filter, (5.48) can be transformed into the form of (5.46) 3 ! # 4µ m
σN2 (m) −1/2 −1/2 −1/2 a˜ MMSE = D D−1/2 r. (5.49) INu − D R + 2 INu D σ A µ=0 Now, the same argumentation as for the decorrelator can be applied and the condition for convergence becomes (Grant and Schlegel 2001) C 2 D 2 D σ A2u,u λu + σN2 /σA2 max < 2 ⇒ β < min E2 + 2 N 2 − 1 . u=1...Nu u=1...Nu A2u,u + σ 2 /σ 2 Au,u σA N A The first difference compared to the decorrelator is that the maximum load β depends on the SNR σN2 /σA2 = N0 /Es . This term increases the convergence area a little bit. However, for high SNR σN2 /σA2 becomes small and both decorrelator and MMSE filter are approached only for low loads. This behavior is illustrated in Figure 5.9a showing the results for the first five iterations and a load β = 0.5. Only for very low SNR (large σN2 /σA2 ) the iterative approximation reaches the true MMSE filter. For higher SNRs, β = 0.5 is beyond the convergence region and the PIC performs even worse than the matched filter. Figure 5.9b shows the results for Eb /N0 = 10 dB versus β. Again, it is confirmed that convergence can be ensured only for low load.

5.2.4 Linear Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) The poor convergence properties of the linear PIC can be substantially improved. Imagine that the interference cancellation described in (5.44) is carried out successively for different

10

BER →

10 10 10 10 10

a) β = 0.5

0

b) Eb /N0 = 10 dB

0

10

−1

−2

−1

10

BER →

10

−3

−4

−5

−6

0

1 iteration 2 iterations 3 iterations 4 iterations 5 iterations 5 10 15 Eb /N0 in dB →

−2

10

−3

20

10

0

0.5

1 β→

1.5

2

Figure 5.9 Performance of linear PIC approximating the MMSE filter (upper dashed line: matched filter; lower dashed line: true MMSE filter)

244

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

users starting with u = 1 and ending with u = Nu . Considering the µ-th iteration for user u, (µ−1) only estimates a˜ v=u of the previous iteration µ − 1 are used. However, updated estimates (µ) a˜ v 1 approach the hard decision. Next, two further nonlinear functions are proposed. The first one (NL 1) has a linear shape around the origin and hops to ±1 for values larger than a certain threshold α   −1 for y < −α (5.54) QNL1 (y) = y for |y| ≤ α   +1 for y > α. The difference compared to the clipper is that this nonlinearity starts to totally remove the interference for values smaller than 1. The parameter α has to be optimized according to the load and the SNR. The second function (NL 2) avoids any cancellation for unreliable

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

247

1

α = 0.5 α=1 α=2 α=4 HD clipper

q(x) →

0.5

0

−0.5

−1 −4

−3

−2

−1

0 x→

1

2

3

4

Figure 5.12 Comparison of tanh for different α with hard decision and clipper values and allows interference reduction only above a threshold α   −1 for y < −1       y for − 1 ≤ y ≤ −α QNL2 (y) = 0 for |y| < α    y for α ≤ y ≤ +1    +1 for y > +1.

(5.55)

Obviously, it reduces to a simple clipper for α = 0. Finally, we will look at coded CDMA systems. If the computational costs do not represent a restriction, the channel decoder can be used as a nonlinear device (Hagenauer 1996a). Since it exploits the redundancy of the code, it can increase the reliability of the estimates remarkably. Again, we have to distinguish between hard-output and soft-output decoding. For convolutional codes presented in Chapter 3, hard-output decoding can be performed by the Viterbi algorithm while soft-output decoding can be carried out by the BCJR or Max-Log-MAP algorithms.

5.3.2 Uncoded Nonlinear Interference Cancellation Uncoded Parallel Interference Cancellation First, we have to optimize the parameter α for the nonlinear functions NL 1, NL 2, and tanh. We start our analysis with the PIC whose structure for the linear case in Figure 5.8 has to be extended. Figure 5.13 shows the µ-th stage of the resulting multistage receiver. (µ−1) of the previous Prior to the interference cancellation, the interference reduced signals r˜v −1 iteration are scaled with coefficients Mv,v . The application of the nonlinear function now yields estimates for all signals  −1 (µ−1) · r˜v . (5.56) a˜ v(µ−1) = Q Mv,v

248

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS r1 (µ−1)

r˜1

−1 M1,1

(µ−1)

r˜Nu rNu

MN−1u ,Nu

(µ−1)

Q(·)

a˜ 1

Nu v=2

(µ−1)

Q(·)

a˜ Nu

N u −1

(µ)

(µ)

cca˜ v(µ−1) M1,v

r˜1

−1 M1,1

Q(·)

(µ)

(µ)

(µ−1) MNu ,v a˜ v

v=1

r˜Nu

MN−1u ,Nu

a˜ 1

Q(·)

a˜ Nu

µ-th stage

Figure 5.13 µ-th stage of a multistage detector for nonlinear parallel interference cancellation (µ−1)

For user u, all estimates a˜ v=u are first weighted with the correlation coefficients Mu,v=u , then summed up and finally subtracted from the matched filter output ru
r˜u(µ) = ru − Mu,v · a˜ v(µ−1) . (5.57) v=u

After this cancellation step is performed for all users, the procedure is repeated. If the iterative scheme converges and the global optimum is reached, the interference is cancelled more and more until the single-user performance is obtained. However, the iterative algorithm may get stuck in a local optimum. Figure 5.14 shows the performance of the nonlinearities NL 1 and NL 2 versus the NL 2 = 0 is always the best choice design parameter α. Looking at NL 2, we observe that αopt regardless of the number of iterations. Hence, NL 2 reduces to a simple clipper. With regard to NL 1, the optimum α depends on the iteration. In the first stage, the minimum NL 1 = 1. For the fifth stage, 0.3 ≤ BER is also delivered by a clipper obtained with αopt NL 1 αopt ≤ 0.4 is the best choice. Moreover, the comparison of NL 2 with NL 1 shows that NL 1 is at least as good as NL 2 and generally outperforms NL 2 (Zha and Blostein 2003). The same analysis has been performed for the tanh-function. From Figure 5.15 we recognize that 1 ≤ α ≤ 2 is an appropriate choice for a large variety of loads. With growing β, the optimum α becomes smaller and approaches 1 for β = 1.25. This indicates that the SINR is small for large β. However, the differences are rather small in this interval. Only very low values of α result in a severe degradation because no interference is cancelled for α = 0 leading to the matched filter performance. If α is chosen too large, the tanh function saturates for most inputs and the error rate performance equals that of a hard decision. Figure 5.16a now compares all proposed nonlinearities for a fully loaded OFDM-CDMA system with β = 1 and five iterations. The tanh-function with optimized α shows the best performance among all schemes. NL 1 and clipper come closest to the tanh. The hard decision already loses 2 dB compared to the tanh. Although the nonlinearities consider the finite nature of the signal alphabet and all nonlinearities clearly outperform the matched

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

BER →

10

10

a) first iteration

0

−1

β β β β

b) fifth iteration

0

10

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−1

10

BER →

10

249

−2

β β β β

−2

10

SUB 10

SUB

−3

0

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−3

0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

0.8

10

1

0

0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

0.8

1

Figure 5.14 PIC optimization for NL 1 and NL 2 in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and Eb /N0 = 8 dB (solid lines: NL 1, dashed lines: NL 2)

BER →

10

10

a) first iteration

0

−1

β β β β

b) fifth iteration

0

10

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−1

10

BER →

10

−2

β β β β

−2

10

SUB 10

SUB

−3

0

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−3

0.4

0.8 1.2 α→

1.6

2

10

0

0.4

0.8 1.2 α→

1.6

2

Figure 5.15 PIC optimization for tanh in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and Eb /N0 = 8 dB filter, we observe an error floor that the SUB cannot be reached. Figure 5.16b illustrates this loss versus β. At a load of β = 1, the error rate is increased by one decade compared to the single-user case; for β = 1.5, only the tanh can achieve a slight improvement compared to a simple matched filter. Therefore, we can conclude that nonlinear devices taking into account the finite nature of the signal alphabet improve the convergence behavior of PIC. The SUB is approximately reached up to loads of β = 0.5. For higher loads, performance degrades dramatically until no benefit to the matched filter can be observed.

250

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS a) β = 1

0

10

−1

−1

−2

10

−3

0

10

MF HD NL 1 clip tanh 2 4 6 8 Eb /N0 in dB →

BER →

BER →

10

10

b) Eb /N0 = 8 dB

0

10

MF HD NL 1 clip tanh

−2

10

−3

10

10

0

0.5

1

1.5

β→

Figure 5.16 PIC performance comparison of different nonlinearities with optimized α in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel Uncoded Successive Interference Cancellation From linear interference cancellation techniques, we already know that SIC according to the Gauss-Seidel algorithm converges much better than the PIC. Consequently, we now analyze on the nonlinear SIC. Figure 5.17 illustrates the influence of the parameter α for NL 2 = 0 is the NL 1 and NL 2 on the SIC performance. As already observed for PIC, αopt best choice regardless of the load and the considered iteration, and reduces nonlinearity

BER →

10

10

a) first iteration

0

−1

β β β β

b) fifth iteration

0

10

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−1

10

BER →

10

−2

β β β β

−2

10

SUB 10

SUB

−3

0

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−3

0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

0.8

1

10

0

0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

0.8

1

Figure 5.17 SIC optimization for NL 1 and NL 2 in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and Eb /N0 = 8 dB (solid lines: NL 1, dashed lines: NL 2)

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

BER →

10

10

a) first iteration

0

β β β β

−1

b) fifth iteration

0

10

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

β β β β

−1

10

BER →

10

251

−2

−2

10

SUB 10

SUB

−3

0

= 0.5 = 0.75 =1 = 1.25

−3

0.4

0.8 1.2 α→

1.6

2

10

0

0.4

0.8 1.2 α→

1.6

2

Figure 5.18 SIC optimization for tanh in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and Eb /N0 = 8 dB NL 2 to a simple clipper. However, the influence of α on the error rate performance is much larger than for PIC. For α NL 2 → 1 which leads to a large interval of magnitudes where no interference is cancelled, the error rate tends to 0.5 for all iterations while the loss was quite moderate for the PIC. With regard to NL 1, α has nearly no influence at the first iteration. In subsequent stages, for example, the fifth iteration, the influence increases with growing load β and the NL 1 = 0.4. Again, NL 1 with optimum α shows a better lowest error rate is obtained for αopt performance than NL 2. Figure 5.18 depicts the optimization for the tanh-function. Astonishingly, the results in the first iteration differ from those of the PIC. The lowest error probability is obtained for tanh = 2 regardless of the load β. Also, in the subsequent stages this choice of α represents αopt a very good solution and it coincides with the results of the PIC. As can be seen from Figure 5.19, NL 1 outperforms all other schemes and represents the best nonlinearity under consideration. For β = 1, the SUB is reached within a gap of 0.5 dB for all SNRs. The clipper (NL 2 with α = 0) and the tanh come closest to NL 1 while hard decisions lose remarkably. From Figure 5.19b we see that, compared to the SUB, NL 1 and the tanh are able to keep the loss quite low up to a load of β = 1.5. Even for this high load, the gain over the matched filter is significant. Hence, we can conclude that the considered nonlinearities with optimum design parameters improve the performance for both PIC and SIC. However, SIC still shows a better convergence behavior and comes close to the SUB even for high loads. Performance of Nonlinear SIC for QPSK Modulation If we change from BPSK to QPSK, the effective interference is doubled (cf. Chapter 4). Only slight changes are necessary to adapt the presented algorithms to QPSK. All nonlinearities have to be applied separately to the real and imaginary parts of the signals. Because

252

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS a) β = 1

0

10

−1

−1

−2

10

−3

0

10

MF HD NL 1 clip tanh 2 4 6 8 Eb /N0 in dB →

BER →

BER →

10

10

b) Eb /N0 = 8 dB

0

10

MF HD NL 1 clip tanh

−2

10

−3

10

10

0

0.5

1

1.5

β→

Figure 5.19 Performance comparison of different nonlinearities with optimized α for SIC in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (five iterations)

BER →

10

10

10

a) Eb /N0 = 8 dB

0

b) Eb /N0 = 20 dB

0

10

−1

−1

10

BER →

10

−2

−3

0

−2

10

first iteration fifth iteration 10th iteration 0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

−3

0.8

1

10

0

0.2

0.4 0.6 α→

0.8

1

Figure 5.20 SIC optimization for NL 1 and NL 2 in an uncoded OFDM-CDMA system with β = 1, QPSK, and a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (solid lines: NL 1, dashed lines: NL 2) of the doubled interference, the results we obtain for β = 0.75 and QPSK are nearly the same as for β = 1.5 and BPSK. Figure 5.20 analyzes the influence of the parameter α of the nonlinearities for an OFDM-CDMA system with β = 1 and a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel. For medium SNRs like Eb /N0 = 8 dB, the results coincide with those already obtained for BPSK. Nearly no influence can be observed in the first stage. For further iterations and larger

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

BER →

10

10

10

a) fifth iteration

0

b) 10th iteration

0

10

−1

−2

−3

0

−1

10

MF HD NL 1 clip tanh

BER →

10

253

−2

10

SUB

SUB

5 10 15 Eb /N0 in dB →

−3

20

10

0

5 10 15 Eb /N0 in dB →

20

Figure 5.21 SIC performance for nonlinearities with optimized α in an uncoded OFDMCDMA system with QPSK and 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (β = 1)

SNR, for example, 20 dB, NL 1 requires a larger α to perform optimally. Because of the high interference, the estimates are less reliable and the step toward ±1 occurs at higher tanh amplitudes. With reference to the tanh, αopt = 2 still represents a very good choice. Figure 5.21 shows the BER performance for 5 and 10 iterations and optimized α for NL 1 and tanh. While the hard decision does not gain from additional iterations, the nonlinear function NL 1, the tanh-function, and the clipper enhance the error rate remarkably. The tanh with optimized α is still the best choice. However, for this high load there remains a large gap to the SUB (bold line) that roughly amounts to 4 dB at an error rate of 2 · 10−3 .

5.3.3 Nonlinear Coded Interference Cancellation Resuming the way from linear multistage receivers to nonlinear interference cancellation schemes, it is straightforward to incorporate the channel decoder into the iterative structures for coded CDMA systems. Again, we restrict to BPSK and QPSK schemes for notational simplicity. The structure of the transmitter is already known from Figure 5.1. The corresponding receiver for PIC is depicted in Figure 5.22. After the matched filter bank, the obtained signals ru , 1 ≤ u ≤ Nu , are de-interleaved and FEC decoded. The decoders deliver either soft-outputs L(bˆu ) of the code bits like log-likelihood ratios or hard estimates bˆu . Softoutputs can be generated by the BCJR or the Max-Log-MAP decoder while hard-outputs are obtained by the Viterbi algorithm. Next, the outputs are interleaved and processed by a nonlinear function. This is necessary for soft-outputs because log-likelihoods are generally not limited in magnitude while the true code bits are either +1 or −1. From Chapter 3, we know that the expectation of a bit can be calculated with its log-likelihood ratio by tanh(L/2) (see (3.36) on page 110). This is exactly the reason for using the tanh. Finally, the interfering signals are weighted with

254

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS r1 L(bˆ1 )

(µ−1)

aˆ 1

−1 1

FEC dec.

PIC/SIC stage

b˜1

tanh

−1 Nu

FEC dec.

(µ)

Nu cc M1,v b˜v

aˆ 1

v=2 (µ) dˆ1

L(bˆNu )

(µ−1)

aˆ Nu

1

Nu

b˜Nu

tanh

N u −1

MNu ,v b˜v

(µ)

aˆ Nu

v=1

(µ) dˆNu

rNu Figure 5.22 Single stage of a nonlinear PIC receiver in coded CDMA systems

the correlation coefficients Mu,v , summed up, and subtracted from the matched filter output ru . The obtained estimate represents the input of the next stage. For the following simulation results, an OFDM-CDMA system with a half-rate convolutional code of constraint length Lc = 7 is considered. As in a mobile radio channel, a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel with uniform power delay profile is employed. Moreover, BPSK and QPSK are alternatively chosen and on an average each user has the same SNR. Figure 5.23a shows the performance of the coded PIC. After four PIC iterations, the SUB is obtained even for β = 1.5, which is equivalent to a spectral efficiency of η = Rc · β = 0.75. We see that decoding helps improve the convergence of iterative interference cancellation schemes. The reliability of the estimated interference is enhanced, leading to a better cancellation step. At low SNR, a gap to the SUB occurs that grows for increasing load. For β = 2, the PIC scheme does not converge anymore. Figure 5.23b compares hard- and soft-decision outputs at the decoder. The upper bold solid line denotes the matched filter performance and the lower bold solid curve represents the SUB. Naturally, the performances for hard- and soft-outputs after the first decoding (single-user matched filter (SUMF), upper solid line) are the same. For subsequent iterations, the soft-output always outperforms the hard-decision output. However, the differences are rather small and amount at the most to 0.5 dB. For this example, both hard- and soft-output decoding reach the SUB at error rates below 10−4 . Nevertheless, for extremely high loads, convergence may be maintained with soft-output decoding while hard-decision decoding will fail. Next, parallel and SIC are compared in Figure 5.24a. The upper bold solid line represents the matched filter performance without interference cancellation, and the lower bold solid curve represents the SUB. After three PIC iterations, both SIC and PIC reach the SUB. However, SIC converges faster and in this example needs one iteration less than the PIC scheme. Hence, the benefits of SIC are preserved when coding is applied. In Figure 5.24b, the load is increased to β = 2, that is, the spectral efficiency η = 1 bit/s/Hz of such a system is twice as high as for half-rate coded TDMA or FDMA systems (K¨uhn 2001a,c). We

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

BER →

10 10 10 10 10

a) four iterations

0

b) β = 1.5

0

10

−1

−1

10

−2

BER →

10

255

−3

−4

−5

0

β β β β

= 0.5 =1 = 1.5 =2

2 4 6 Eb /N0 in dB →

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

−5

10

8

0

it. 1 it. 2 it. 3 it. 4 2 4 6 Eb /N0 in dB →

8

Figure 5.23 PIC performance of coded OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel, convolutional code with Rc = 1/2, and Lc = 7 (bold line: single-user bound) a) comparing various loads b) comparing hard-output (×) and soft-output () decoding

BER →

10 10 10 10 10

a) β = 1.5

0

b) four iterations

0

10

−1

−1

10

−2

BER →

10

−3

−4

−5

0

it. 1 it. 2 it. 3 2 4 6 Eb /N0 in dB →

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

−5

8

10

0

β = 1.5 β=2 2 4 6 Eb /N0 in dB →

8

Figure 5.24 Performance of PIC (×) and SIC () for coded OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (bold line: single-user bound) a) comparing convergence of PIC and SIC b) comparing PIC and SIC for various loads see that the SIC scheme performs as much for β = 2 as the PIC approach performs for β = 1.5. For a doubly loaded system, the PIC scheme does not converge anymore. Sorted Nonlinear Successive Interference Cancellation There exists a major difference between parallel and SIC. Owing to the problem of error propagation, the order of detection is crucial for SIC. This dependency is illustrated in

256

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS 0

10

it. 1 it. 2 it. 3 it. 4

−1

BER →

10

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

−5

10

0

2

4 Eb /N0 in dB →

6

8

Figure 5.25 SIC performance (solid: unsorted, dashed: sorted) for coded OFDM-CDMA system with 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and β = 2 (bold line: single-user bound) Figure 5.25 comparing sorted and unsorted SIC. Sorting is implemented by calculating the average magnitude of the decoder output and starting with the strongest user. This is probably not the best strategy, but it can be easily implemented. Obviously, sorting leads to a faster convergence. Especially, at low SNR the gap to the SUB can be decreased. Therefore, sorting is always applied for SIC in subsequent parts. Figure 5.26 now compares the performance of SIC for BPSK and QPSK modulations. We know from Section 4.1 that the use of QPSK in the uplink doubles the effective interference. The spectral efficiency is also doubled because we transmit twice as many bits 0

10

BPSK, β = 1 BPSK, β = 2 QPSK, β = 1 QPSK, β = 2

−1

BER →

10

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

−5

10

0

2

4 6 Eb /N0 in dB →

8

Figure 5.26 SIC performance for OFDM-CDMA system with a half-rate convolutional code (Lc = 7) and 4-path Rayleigh fading channel (bold line: single-user bound)

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

257

per symbol as for BPSK, ηQPSK = 2ηBPSK holds. After four PIC iterations, we observe that the SUB has been reached for QPSK and β = 1. This is equivalent to β = 2 for BPSK. No convergence is obtained for β = 2 and QPSK because the initial SINR is too low for achieving reliable estimates from the decoders. Influence of Convolutional Codes Finally, the influence of different convolutional codes is analyzed. Figure 5.27 compares two half-rate convolutional codes: the already used Lc = 7 code and a weaker Lc = 3 code. Looking at Figure 5.27a, we see that three or four iterations suffice to reach the SUB for BPSK. With regard to QPSK, even 10 iterations cannot close the gap of approximately 4 dB. On the contrary, convergence starts earlier with the weak Lc = 3 code as shown in Figure 5.27b. Although the Lc = 3 code has a worse SUB, it performs better than the strong convolutional code and reaches its SUB even for β = 2 and QPSK. Although the difference between the two SUBs amounts to 2 dB in favor of the stronger convolutional code, the Lc = 3 code now gains 2 dB compared to the Lc = 7 code. The explanation for this behavior can be found by observing the SUB curves for both codes in Figure 5.27. We see that the Lc = 3 code has a slightly better performance at low SNR. For larger SNR, the curves intersect and the Lc = 7 code becomes superior. However, the first interference cancellation stage suffers from noise as well as from severe interference that was not yet cancelled. For increasing loads, the SINR at the decoder inputs becomes smaller and smaller until it reaches the intersection of both curves. For higher loads, the weak code now performs better. In our example, parameters were chosen such that the strong code cannot achieve convergence while the Lc = 3 code still reaches its SUB. Therefore, we can conclude that strong error control codes are not

BER →

10 10 10 10 10

a) Lc = 7

0

b) Lc = 3

0

10

−1

−1

10

−2

BER →

10

−3

−4

−5

0

−2

10

−3

10

−4

10

BPSK QPSK 2 4 6 8 10 Eb /N0 in dB →

−5

12

10

0

BPSK QPSK 2 4 6 8 Eb /N0 in dB →

10

Figure 5.27 Sorted SIC performance for half-rate coded OFDM-CDMA system with β = 2, a 4-path Rayleigh fading channel and different convolutional codes (bold line: single-user bound)

258

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

always the best choice and that the coding scheme has to be carefully adapted to the detector.4

5.4 Combining Linear MUD and Nonlinear SIC 5.4.1 BLAST-like Detection As we saw in the previous results, the first detection stage suffers severely from multiuser interference. Hence, its error rate will dominate the performance of subsequent detection steps because of error propagation. The overall performance and the convergence speed can be improved by a linear suppression of the interference prior to the first detection stage. The Bell Labs Layered Space-Time (BLAST) detection of the Bell Labs (Foschini 1996; Foschini and Gans 1998; Golden et al. 1998; Wolniansky et al. 1998) pursues this approach for multiple antenna systems. It can be directly applied to CDMA systems since both systems have similar structures and the same mathematical description y = Sa + n. In a first step, a linear filter w1 is applied suppressing the interference for user 1. The filter can be designed according to the ZF or MMSE criterion, both discussed in Section 5.2, that is, w1 denotes the first column of W1 = WZF or W1 = WMMSE according to Section 5.2 yielding a˜ 1 = wH (5.58) 1 · y. Next, the symbol aˆ 1 = Q(a˜ 1 ) can be decided with improved reliability because less interference disturbs this decision. Instead of performing a hard decision, other nonlinear functions as analyzed in Section 5.3 can be used. After detecting aˆ 1 , its influence onto the remaining signals can be removed by subtracting its contribution s1 aˆ 1 from the received vector y (interference cancellation) y˜ 2 = y − s1 aˆ 1 , (5.59) where the vector s1 represents the first column of the system matrix S (see Figure 4.7 or (4.68)). The residual signal y˜ 2 is then processed by a second filter w2 . It is obtained by removing s1 from S and calculating the ZF or MMSE filter W2 for the reduced system  matrix S˜ 2 = s2 · · · sNu . The first column of W2 denotes the filter w2 that is used for ˜ 2 . This procedure is repeated suppressing the interference of the second user by a˜ 2 = wH 2 ·y until all users have been detected. To determine the linear filters in the different detection steps, the system matrices describing the reduced systems have to be inverted. This causes high implementation costs. However, a much more convenient way exists that avoids multiple matrix inversions. This approach leads to identical results and is presented in the next section.

5.4.2 QL Decomposition for Zero-Forcing Solution In this subsection, an alternative implementation of the BLAST detector is introduced. It saves computational complexity compared to the original detector introduced in the last 4 It has to be mentioned that this conclusion holds for uniform power distribution among the users. If different power levels occur (near-far effects), strong codes can have a better performance than weak codes (Caire et al. 2004).

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

259

section. As for the linear multiuser detectors, we can distinguish the ZF and the MMSE solution. We start with the derivation of the QL decomposition for the linear ZF solution.5 Going back to the model y = Sa + n, the system matrix S can be decomposed into an Ns × Nu matrix Q with orthogonal columns qu of unit lengths and an Nu × Nu lower triangular matrix L (Golub and van Loan 1996) y = QLa + n. Because QH Q = INu , the multiplication of y with QH yields   0 L1,1  L2,1 L2,2 0    y˜ = QH · y = La + QH n =  .  · a + n˜ . . .. ..  ..  LNu ,1 LNu ,2 · · · LNu ,Nu

(5.60)

(5.61)

with n˜ still representing white Gaussian noise because Q is unitary. To clarify the effect of multiplying with QH , we consider the matched filter outputs r = SH y = Ra + SH n. Performing a Cholesky decomposition (Golub and van Loan 1996) of R = LH L with the lower triangular matrix L, results in r = LH La + SH n

⇒

r˜ = La + L−H SH n.

(5.62)

The comparison of (5.61) with (5.62) illustrates that the multiplication of y with QH can be split into two steps. First, a matched filter is applied, providing the colored noise vector SH n with the covariance matrix  = σN2 R = σN2 LH L. Therefore, the second step represents a multiplication with −1/2 = L−H which can be interpreted as whitening. Because of the triangular structure of L in (5.61), the received vector y˜ has been partly freed of interference, for example, y˜1 depends only on a1 disturbed by the noise term n˜ 1 . Hence, it can be directly estimated by appropriate scaling and the application of a nonlinearity Q(·) 0 / . (5.63) · y ˜ aˆ 1 = Q L−1 1 1,1 The obtained estimate can be inserted in the second row to subtract interference from y˜2 and so on. We obtain the u-th estimate by ! 3 4# u−1
1 · y˜u − Lu,v · aˆ v aˆ u = Q . (5.64) Lu,u v=1

This procedure abbreviated by QL-SIC has to be continued until the last symbol aNu has been estimated so that a SIC as depicted in Figure 5.28 is carried out. With this recursive procedure, the matrix inversions of the original BLAST detection can be circumvented and only a single QL decomposition has to be carried out. Furthermore, we can exploit the finite nature of the signal alphabet by introducing Q(·). The linear filtering with Q has to cope partly with the same problems as the decorrelator. For the first user, all Nu − 1 interfering signals have to be linearly suppressed. Since all 5 Throughout the subsequent derivation, the QL decomposition will be used. Equivalently, the QR decomposition of S can often be found in publications.

260

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS y˜1 1/L1,1 y˜2

aˆ 1 Q(·)

L2,1

L4,1

L3,1

1/L2,2

Q(·)

aˆ 2

L3,2 L4,2

y˜3 1/L3,3

Q(·)

aˆ 3 L4,3

y˜4 1/L4,4

Q(·)

aˆ 4

Figure 5.28 Illustration of interference cancellation after decomposing S into Q and L and filtering y with QH

columns of Q have unit length, the noise is not amplified but the desired signal may be very weak. This results in a small diagonal element in L and, hence, a low SNR. In successive steps, more interference is already cancelled and the columns of Q tend more and more toward a matched filter. In multiple antenna systems, this also affects the achievable diversity gain as shown in Section 6.4. From the above explanation, we can also conclude that the proposed scheme cannot be directly applied to systems with a load β > 1. For Nu > Ns , the system matrix S has more columns than rows. Since only Ns orthogonal columns exist that span the Ns dimensional space, Q is an Ns × Ns matrix. Consequently, L would not be a lower triangular matrix but will have the form   L1,Ns +1 . . . L1,Nu L1,1  L2,1 L2,2 L2,Ns +1 . . . L2,Nu    L= . . .. . .. .. ..   .. . . . LNu ,1

LNu ,2

. . . LNu ,Ns

LNu ,Ns +1

. . . LNu ,Nu

We recognize that all layers – even the first – now suffer from interference. Further information about overloaded systems in the context of multiple antenna systems can be found in Damen et al. (2003). With reference to the MMSE solution, a direct implementation is possible even for β > 1 (see Section 5.4.3). Improvement of Real Modulation Schemes From linear detectors such as the decorrelator and MMSE filter, we already know that remarkable improvements can be achieved by taking into account that the imaginary part of the transmitted symbols does not contain information for real-valued modulation schemes. To exploit this knowledge for the QL decomposition also, we have to separate the real and

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS

261

imaginary parts for all terms of the equation y = Sa + n. With y
, S
, a
and n
denoting real parts and y

, S

, a

, and n

representing the imaginary parts, we obtain *
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ S −S

a n y =

·

+

. (5.65) y

S S
a n Since a

= 0 for real modulation schemes, a
= a holds and (5.65) reduces to *
+ *
+ *
+ n S y
=

· a +

= Sr · a + nr . y

S n

(5.66)

From (5.66), we see that the real system matrix has twice as many rows as S. This generally leads to a better condition and, therefore, a lower noise amplification in the ZF case. Representing the received symbols by separated real and imaginary parts, we simply have to decompose Sr . The obtained real matrices Qr and Lr are then used for the subsequent detection procedure, as described above. The results will be presented at the end of this subsection. Modified Gram-Schmidt Algorithm QL decompositions can be implemented with different algorithms using Householder reflections or Givens rotations (see Appendix C). In this book, we will refer to the modified Gram-Schmidt algorithm (Golub and van Loan 1996) leading to   S = s1 · · · sNu −1 sNu = QL   L1,1  . ..     .  . (5.67) = q1 · · · qNu −1 qNu ·  . .  LNu −1,1 LNu −1,2 LNu −1,Nu −1 LNu ,1 LNu ,2 LNu ,Nu −1 LNu ,Nu The orthonormal columns qu are determined successively one after the other. Neglecting for the moment an appropriate sorting, we start with the last column qNu = sNu /sNu , that is, qNu points to the same direction as the last signature sNu and has unit norm. Because sNu = LNu ,Nu · qNu , LNu ,Nu = sNu  equals the length of the last signature. The next column vector qNu −1 must be orthogonal to qNu . Hence, we first subtract the projection of sNu −1 onto qNu LNu ,Nu −1 = qH Nu sNu −1

⇒

q˜ Nu −1 = sNu −1 − LNu ,Nu −1 · qNu

(5.68a)

and normalize the difference with LNu −1,Nu −1 to length 1. LNu −1,Nu −1 = q˜ Nu −1 

⇒

qNu −1 = q˜ Nu −1 /LNu −1,Nu −1

(5.68b)

The third column qNu −2 has to be perpendicular to the plane spanned by qNu and qNu −1 . Hence, the above procedure has to be repeated and we obtain the general construction of the u-th column qu . Lv,u = qH v · su for u ≤ v < Nu

⇒

q˜ u = su −

Nu


Lv,u · qv

(5.69a)

v=u+1

Lu,u = q˜ u 

⇒

qu = q˜ u /Lu,u

(5.69b)

262

MULTIUSER DETECTION IN CDMA SYSTEMS Table 5.1 Pseudo Schmidt algorithm step (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

code

for

modified

Gram-

task Initialize with L = 0, Q = S for u = Nu , . . . , 1 determine diagonal element Lu,u = qu  normalize qu = qu /Lu,u to unit length for v = 1, . . . , u − 1 calculate projections Lu,v = qH u · qv qv = qv − Lu,v · qu end end

This procedure develops Q and L from right to left and has to be continued until all Nu columns in Q and the corresponding elements in L have been determined. Subtracting the projections of the unprocessed columns sv