UNIFORM FRECHET ALGEBRAS
NORTH-HOLLAND MATHEMATICS STUDIES 162 (Continuation of the Notas de Matematica)
Editor: Leo...
104 downloads
844 Views
9MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
UNIFORM FRECHET ALGEBRAS
NORTH-HOLLAND MATHEMATICS STUDIES 162 (Continuation of the Notas de Matematica)
Editor: Leopoldo NACHBIN Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and University of Rochester New York, U.S.A.
NORTH-HOLLAND -AMSTERDAM
NEW YORK
OXFORD TOKYO
UNIFORM FRECHET ALGEBRAS
Helmut GOLDMANN Marhemarisches lnstitut der Universiriir Bayreurh 68yreUth, ER.G.
1990
NORTH-HOLLAND -AMSTERDAM
NEW YORK
OXFORD TOKYO
ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V. Sara Burgerhartstraat25 P.O. Box 211,1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands Distributors for the United States and Canada: ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 065 Avenue of the Americas New York, N.Y. 10010, U.S.A.
Ltbrary o f Congrrrr Cataloglng-in-Publication Data
Ooldaann, Helmut. Uniforn Frichet algabras / Helaut Goldaann. p. cn. (North-Holland nathrnetics studies ; 162) Includrs bibllographlcal referencrr. ISBN 0-444-88488-2 (U.S.) 1. Uniforn algabras. I. Tltlr. 11. Title: Frachrt algebras. 111. Sarles. OA328.084 1990 90-6870 612'.66--dc20
--
CIP
ISBN: 0 44488488 2 @
ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS B.V., 1990
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in .any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V./Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, P.O.Box 103, 1000 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Special regulations for readers in the U.S.A. - This publication has been registered with the Copyright Clearance Center Inc. (CCC), Salem, Massachusetts. Information can be obtained from the CCC about conditions under which photocopies of parts of this publication may be made in the U.S.A. All other copyright questions, including photocopyingoutside of the U.S.A., should be referredto the publisher. No responsibility is assumed by the publisherfor any injury and/or damage to personsor property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructionsor ideas contained in the material herein. Printed in the Netherlands
To my parents, and to a l l my friends for just being there.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
PREFACE
By a uniform (Banach) algebra we mean a uniformly closed algebra of complex-val ued continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space. These algebras have been studied intensively and there exists a vast literature on this subject. But there are important examples of algebras of continuous functions on noncompact spaces which are not Banach algebras, we mention for example Hol(X). the algebra of a l l holomorphic functions on a domain X in C". Hence it makes sense t o generalize the t e r m uniform algebra in an appropriate way. This leads to the definition o f uniform Frechet algebras. The t e r m refers to an algebra of complex-valued continuous functions on a hemicompact space which i s complete with respect to the compact open topology. (By a hemicompact space we mean a Hausdorff space X such that there exists a countable compact exhaustion (KnIn of X such that each compact subset K of X is contained in some K.,
e.g. l e t X be a locally compact and o-compact
Hausdorff space.) Examples are the algebra o f a l l continuous functions on a hemicompact k-space and Hol(X1. the algebra of a l l holomorphic functions on a hemicompact reduced complex space X. An important problem in the theory of uniform (Banach) algebras i s the question of the existence of analytic structure in the spectrum of a uniform algebra A. 1.e. the question as whether parts o f the spectrum can be endowed with the structure of a complex space so that a l l elements of A elements of A
-
-
more precisely a l l Gelfand transforms of
become analytic functions with respect t o this struc-
ture. We adopt this question for uniform Frechet algebras. So the main part of this book is devoted t o the problem when a given uniform Frechet algebra is topologically and algebraically isomorphic
ii
to Hol(X1. X a suitable complex space. We obtain a function algebraic characterization of certain classes o f algebras of holomorphic functions. In particular we give various characterizations of Hol ( X I in the case that X is
-
an n-dimensional Stein space, an n-dimensional Stein manifold,
- a Rlemann domain over -a
Cn,
domain of holomorphy in Cn,
- a polynomially convex domain in Cn, - a logarithmical l y convex complete Reinhardt domain, - a domain in C , etc.. These results have been mainly obtained by Arens. Brooks, Carpenter and Kramm. The material is presented in three sections. I n the f i r s t chapter we c o l l e c t definitions and results from the theory o f Banach algebras which are constantly used in the book. Since this material has been w e l l reported in many books, cf. for example [GAM], [STO], we omit the proofs of the results in most cases but give references. I n the second chapter we consider the algebra Hol(X) in greater detail. On the one hand it serves us as the f i r s t example of a uniform Fr6chet algebra, on the other hand, since we want t o characterize Hol(X) within the class of uniform Fr6chet algebras, we coll e c t properties of it which w i l l be discussed l a t e r in the general settlng of uniform Fr6chet algebras. The necessary background in the theory of several complex variables i s w e l l presented in t e x t books, e.g. in [G/R],
[GR/R],
[HUR]. I have included these prelim-
inary chapters t o make this book more accessible f o r a reader who i s not so familiar with these theories. The second part is devoted t o the study o f uniform Fr6chet algebras resp. more generally to the study o f Fr6chet algebras. One starting point are surely the papers of Arens [ARE 6 1 and Michael [MIC] in
iii
the early fifties. A basic r e s u l t is the projective limit representation of each Frechet algebra. It enables us t o develope this theory along the lines of the theory of Banach algebras. Many results which are known for Banach algebras remain true f o r Frgchet algebras with almost the same proofs. In particular we mention the holomorphic functional calculus and consequences o f it like Shilov's idempotent theorem etc.. Problems arise in connection with the question as whether each mu1tip1 icative I inear functional on a Frechet algebra i s automatically continuous. This question, known as Michael's problem, has been intensively studied (cf. the paper of Dixon and Esterle [DIE]), but only partial answers have been obtained. So t o carry over some results f o r Frechet algebras, like the uniqueness of norm theorem f o r semisimple Banach algebras, one has to develope completely new proofs. Differences between both theories appear in connecion with peak points. There exists no analogue f o r Frechet algebras to Rossi's maximum modulus principle. The third part is devoted t o questions of analyticity in one form or another. As mentioned above we characterize various classes of a l gebras of holomorphic functions. Moreover we study properties of holomorphic functions, like the maximum principle, Liouvil le's theorem, Montel's theorem etc., in the general setting o f uniform Frechet a l gebras and ask to what extend they are independent of the existence of analytic structure in the spectrum. We mention an example to Wermer
-
due
- of a uniform Frechet algebra which satisfies the maxi-
mum principle and the identity theorem but whose spectrum does not even contain an analytic disc. There exist several other books which deal with the theory o f more general topological algebras, like locally mu1tiplicatively convex algebras or natural systems, see [ENS]. [GUI], [MALI, [MIC],
[RIC 21, [ZEL]. Some of them contain also results on Frechet alge-
iv
bras. Most results of part 3 and some results of part 2 are presented f o r the f i r s t time in a book. I n [KRA 81 my academic teacher Bruno Kramm announced his book "Nuclear function algebras and Stein algebras
-
holomorphic struc-
ture in spectra", which should also appear in this series, but which has not been finished due to his tragic death in 1983. The present book is not the book Bruno had in mind. However parts of the book, in particular the part on the elementary theory of uniform FrQchet algebras, owe much t o a lecture o f Bruno, held at the university of Munich in 1980. I hope this book r e f l e c t s also some of the spirit of his work on this subject. Finally, it is a pleasure for me to thank Peter Pflug from Vechta f o r his constant encouragement during the preparation of this book. Many valuable suggestions and improvements are due t o him. I am also indebted t o Sandra Hayes from Munich for stimulating discussions. Robert Braun, Paul Fischer. Stefan MU1ler-Stach and Roland Weinfurtner did much of the proof reading, Elisabeth Guth typed a f i r s t version of the manuscript.
CONTENTS Preface
.
PART 1
..............................................................................
i
BANACH ALGEBRAS. ALGEBRAS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS. AN INTRODUCTION
.
CHAPTER 1 An excurs on Banach algebras
....................................................... The spectrum of a B-algebra .................................. The Shilov boundary ............................................... The holomorphic functional calculus ......................... Analytic structure in spectra ..................................
(1.1)
General theory
(1.2) (1.3) (1.4) (1.5)
3 9 18 25 30
.
CHAPTER 2 The algebra of holomorphic functions
....................................................... Analytic continuation ............................................... Stein spaces ..........................................................
(2.1)
General theory
(2.2) (2.3)
34 41
50
.
PART I1 GENERAL THEORY OF FRECHET ALGEBRAS
.
CHAPTER 3 Theory of Frechet algebras. basic results (3.1) (3.2) (3.3)
.................................................... The spectrum o f a FrQchet algebra .......................... Projective limits ...................................................... FrQchet algebras
59 71
84
.
CHAPTER 4 General theory of uniform Frechet algebras
(4.3)
........................................ Extension of a uniform Frechet algebra .................... Convexity for uniform FrQchet algebras ....................
(4.4)
Uniform Fr6chet algebras with locally compact spec-
(4.1) (4.2)
Uniform Frechet algebras
trum
.....................................................................
91 97 103 109
vi
.
CHAPTER 5 Finitely generated Fr6chet algebras
......................... Fr6chet algebras ..........
(5.1)
Finitely generated Frechet algebras
113
(5.2)
Rationally finitely generated
122
.
CHAPTER 6 Applications of the projective limit representation
........................
129
..................................
141
(6.1)
The holomorphic functional calculus
(6.2)
The theorem o f Arens-Royden
.
CHAPTER 7 A Fr6chet algebra whose spectrum is not a k-space
.............................................. Surjectivity of the transpose map .............................. The weak Nullstellensatz .......................................
(7.1)
The example o f Dors
(7.2) (7.3)
147 150 155
.
CHAPTER 8 Semisimple Fr6chet algebras
........................................... derivations ..........................................
(8.1)
Uniqueness of topology
161
(8.2)
Continuity of
165
.
CHAPTER 9 Shilov boundary and peak points for Frechet algebras
................. 171 ............................. 180
(9.1)
The Shilov boundary of a Fr6chet algebra
(9.21
Peak points for Fr6chet algebras
.
CHAPTER 10 Michael's problem (10.1)
Results on the automatic continuity of characters
(10.2)
The approach of Dixon and Esterle
...... 185
...........................
190
.
PART 3 ANALYTIC STRUCTURE IN SPECTRA
.
CHAPTER 11 Stein algebras (11.1)
Analytic structure in spectra of uF-algebras
............. 197
.
CHAPTER 12 Characterizing some particular Stein algebras (12.1)
Polynomially convex analytic subsets
................,.......
205
vii
....................
208
Open subsets of the plane
213
(12.4)
Domains of holomorphy
...................................... ...........................................
215
(12.5)
Logarlthmical l y convex complete Reinhardt domains
... 219
(12.2)
Polynomially convex open subsets of Cn
(12.3)
.
CHAPTER 13 Liouville algebras (13.1)
Liouville algebras
...................................................
223
.
CHAPTER 14 Maximum modulus principle (14.1)
Maximum modulus algebras
(14.2)
Maximum modulus algebras
..................................... 231 and subharmonicity ......... 237
CHAPTER 15. Maximum modulus algebras and analytic structure
........................................ algebras and finite mappings ........
(15.1)
Riemann domains over Cn
243
(15.2)
Maximum modulus
248
.
CHAPTER 16 Higher Shilov boundaries (16.1)
Higher Shilov boundaries for uB-algebras
(16.2)
Higher Shilov boundaries for uF-algebras
................. 263 ................. 268
.
CHAPTER 17 Local analytic structure in the spectrum of a uniform Frechet algebra (17.1)
Local rings of functions of uniform Fr6chet algebras
273
.
CHAPTER 18 Reflexive uniform Frgchet algebras (18.1)
Reflexive uniform Frechet algebras
(18.2)
Gleason parts
..........................
285
........................................................
287
.
CHAPTER 19 Uniform Frechet Schwartz algebras
......................................
(19.1)
Fr6chet Schwartz algebras
(19.2)
Strongly uniform Frechet algebras
(19.3)
Chevalley dimension for uniform Frechet algebras
...........................
304 306
..... 310
viii (19.4)
A characterization of pure dimensional Stein algebras 315
(19.5)
Riemann algebras
...................................................
APPENDIX A
.
Subharmonic functions. Poisson integral
APPENDIX B
.
Functional
........... 331 analysis ......................................... 335
...................................................................
336
.........................................................................
330
.................................................................................
350
List of symbols References Index
325
1
PART 1 BANACH ALGEBRAS, ALGEBRAS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS AN INTRODUCTION
This part is devoted to classical definitions and properties of Banach algebras and algebras of holomorphic functions. W e put together main definitions and results which are of constant use in the book. Most o f the results were given without proof but with references.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
3
CHAPTER 1 AN EXCURS ON BANACH ALGEBRAS
Banach algebras w i l l serve us as an important class o f examples o f Fr6chet algebras. Moreover it w i l l turn out that in some sense they are the local building stones of Fr6chet algebras. So, t o develope the theory of Fr6chet algebras we shall frequently have to use results from the theory of Banach algebras. In this chapter we put together results which w i l l be needed later. Of course this excurs is by no means complete and cannot replace the detailed study of Banach algebras, which i s presented in many textbooks (see the l i s t in the bibliography), but intends to make the book more readable for the reader, who Is not familiar with this theory
.
In the f i r s t part of this chapter we give an introduction t o the general theory of Banach algebras. I n the second part we state deeper results. Iike the holomorphic functional calculus, Rossi's maximum modulus theorem etc.
. In this
part we omit the proofs but give al-
ways a detailed reference. I n most cases we cite the books of Stout ISTOl and Gamelin IGAMI. (1.1) General theory (1.1.1) Throughout this book we only consider associative and commu-
tative algebras over the field of complex numbers. With the exception of chapter 3 we also assume that our algebras have an identity, i.e. there is an element 1 in the algebra A such that 1 - f = f for a l l
f
E
A.
Chapter 1
4
(1.1.2) Definition. I) A Banach algebra (B-algebra) is an algebra A, which Is a Banach space and in which multiplication and the norm are linked together by the inequality IIfgll
IIfII 11g11.
f,g
E
A.
Moreover lllll = 1. ill A Banach algebra is called uniform Banach algebra (uB-algebra) if
IIf211 = Ilfl12 for
ali f
0
A.
(1.1.3) Examples. 1) Denote by Ck([O,l])
the algebra of a l l k-times
continuously differentiable (complex-valued) functions on the unit k interval with pointwise defined operations. Then C ([0,1]) Is a B-algebra with respect t o the norm Pk+l(f) = 2 k SUP { I f (i)( t ) l : t
E
[0,1]. i = 0.1.
where f(') denotes the i-th derivative of f. C k C[O.l])
....k) is not a uniform
algebra. 11) Let K be a nonempty compact Hausdorff space. Let C(K) denote
the algebra of a l l (complex-valued) continuous functions on K with pointwise defined operations. Then C(K) becomes a uB-algebra when endowed with the sup-norm
IIfll, ill) Let K
= sup{lf(t)l
:
t e K).
Cn be a compact set. We define
c
P(K) = { f
E
C(K)
:
f can be approximated uniformly on K by
polynomials), and
R(K) = ( f
E
C(K)
4
f can be approximated uniformly on K by
rational functions which are analytic on K). P(K) and R(K) are uB-algebras with respect to the sup-norm and we have P(K)
c
R(K)
c
C(K).
For other examples cf. [STO] and [GAM].
General theory o f Banach algebras
5
(1.1.4) Let B be a B-algebra. We introduce the spectrum d b ) of an element b
P
Tb
B. a(b) is just the spectrum of the operator
B -a
:
B.
->
X
bx.
We shall show that a(b) is a nonempty compact set. As a consequence we get the theorem of Gelfand-Mazur which states that each B-algebra which is a field is isomorphic to C. Definition. a(b) = { X
P
4:
:
X-1-b is not invertible in B).
(1.1.5)Proposition.The set of a l l invertible elements of a B-algebra B
B - l = {b
P
B: There is b-'
E
B so that b-b-' = 1)
is an open subset of B. Proof. Let b
(*I
P
B-'. Let a
Ilb-all
c
B such that
< 1 1 llb-lll.
For n c N set
then f o r n>m
It follows that (snIn is a Cauchy sequence in B. since Ilb-lllllb-all
n(B), cp ->
ker c p .
is bijective. Proof. Let
(Q E
M(B), then
B/ker cp ->
C. b + ker
CQ
->
cp(b).
is a ring isomorphism, hence ker cp is a maximal Ideal. i.e. T is w e l l defined. Clearly T is injective. Now l e t m
Q
n ( B ) be an arbitrary element. The canonical map
Chapter 1
14
B ->
B/m induces a nontrivial homomorphism pm: B ->
considerations above. We have ker
vm =
C by the
m. So T is surjective, too. 0
(1.2.7) I n the next theorem we consider the connection between M(B) and the spectrum a(b) of an element b
E
B.
Theorem. Let B be a B-algebra, and l e t b
E
B be an element. Then
6 M B ) ) = db). Proof. We have $(M(B)) c a(b) by the considerations in (1.2.1).
If z
E
a(b), then 2.1-b is not invertible, i.e. z - l - b is contained in a
maximal ideal m. By theorem (1.2.6) there is p
E
M(B) such that
6(cp) = z.
rn = ker p, hencecp(z.1-b) = 0,resp.
0
(1.2.8)Theorem. Let B be a B-algebra. Then M(B) i s a nonempty compact space. Proof. M(B)*0 by theorem (1.2.7) and theorem (l.l.S).By
(1.2.1) M(B)
is contained in E. the closed unit disc of the dual space of B. Since
E isweak* compact it suffices to show that M(B) i s a weak* closed subset of E. Let p
E
E\M(B). Hence there are f.g p(fg)
Then
- for
E
B such that
* p(f)p(g).
sufficiently small e>O
-
we have &(fg)*&(f)S(g) for a l l 6
of the weak* open set
u = { 6: 16(g)-p(g)i<E. Hence U n M(B) = 0 .
i6(f)-p(f)i<E8 16(fg)-p(fg)l
C(M(B)). b ->
6,
is an isomorphism onto a closed pointseparating subalgebra o f C(M(B)). and we have llbll = Proof. Clearly
I I ~ I Ifor ~ each ~ ~ b) E B.
separates the points of M(B) and contains the con-
stants. We have A
b(M(B)) = a(b)
for each b
E
B by theorem (1.2.71, so
for each b
E
B by remark (1.1.8).
(1.2.11)
0
We shall show next that for certain 8-algebras any two
norms under which the algebra is a B-algebra are equivalent. I t is clear that one cannot expect that such a r e s u l t holds f o r a l l B-algebras, since one can make any Banach space into a B-algebra by defining a l l products t o be zero and adjoining an identity. Deflnition. Let A be a B-algebra. The intersection of a l l maximal ideals of A i s called the radical of A and is denoted by rad A. A i s
16
Chapter 1
called semisimple if rad A = (01. By theorem (1.2.6) rad A = cp
fl E
Q(A)
ker cp.
It follows that A is semisimple iff the Gelfand map
r
1
P.
c(M(A)), f->
A ->
i s injective. Note that in particular each uB-algebra is semisimple. Theorem. Let A and B be B-algebras. If B is semisimple then each homomorphism cp
:
A ->
B is automatically continuous.
Proof. We show that the graph of cp is closed and obtain our r e s u l t from the closed graph theorem (8.2).
-
Let (an,cp(an)In be a sequence w i t h an -> cp(an)
b as
I f J,
n->ao.
J,ocp(an)
-+
E
M(B) then Q ~ c pc M(A). hence
$*cp(a) as n->-
by theorem (1.2.1). Since J,ecp(an) -> J,(b) = J,(cp(a)) for a l l J, Since
a and
o
J,(b) we have
M(B).
B is semisimple we get b = cp(a), as desired. 0
As a corollary we get the uniqueness of the norm topology f o r semisimple B-algebras. This r e s u l t is due t o Gelfand. (1.2.12)Corollary. Let A be a semisimple B-algebra with respect t o a norm II.11. If A is a B-algebra with respect t o a second norm then
11-11
and
II-II, are
Proof. The map id
:
II-II,,
equivalent.
(A,
11.11,)
->
(A,
II-II),a
->
a i s bijective. It is
continuous by the theorem (1.2.11 1 and hence a homeomorphism by the open mapping theorem (B.1).
0
17
Spectra of Banach algebras (1.2.13) We return t o polynomial convexity and consider finitely generated B-algebras. Definition. i) Let B be a B-algebra. and l e t fl, a(fl ,...,fn) = {(cp(f,)
,...,cp(fn))
E
Cn:
....fn
(Q E
E
8. The set
M(A))
is called the joint spectrum of flm...,fn. ii) 8 is called n-generated by fls...,fn
if the polynomials in fl.
...,fn
lie dense in B. Theorem. Let B be an n-generated B-algebra with generating elements fl
,...,fn. Then o(fl ,...,fn) c
Cn is a polynomially convex com-
pact set and the map
?
:
a(fl ,...,fn),
M(A) ->
(Q
n
->
,....fn((Q)), A
(fl(q)
is a homeomorphism. B is topologically and algebraically isomorphic to P(o(fl.
....f,)).
if B
is moreover a uB-algebra. h
Proof. Let F((Q) =
c(JI).then p(p(fl ,...,fn)) = t#(p(fl ,...,fn)) f o r a l l
polynomials p, hence (Q=$since B is n-generated by fl,
....fn, i.e. P
is injective. h
F is clearly continuous. Hence d f l,...,fn) theorem (1.2.8) and Let z
E
$(f l,...,fn)
f
= ?(M(B)) is compact by
is a homeomorphism.
(the polynomially convex h u l l of o(fl,
...*fn)) be an
arbitrary point, then Ip(z)l
ilP~Io(f,,...,f" 1 = IIp(fl
n
.....fn)
ilM(B)
* IIp(fl ,...* f n N
for a l l polynomials p, where p(f ls...,fn)n denotes the Gelfand transform of p(f l.....fn).
For the l a s t inequality cf. (1.2.3). Hence
(Qz(p(fl,...,fn))
= p(z)
18
Chapter 1
defines a continuous homomorphism on the algebra of a l l polynomials Since B is n-generated by fl,....fn.
in fl,...,fn.
ment
gz of 0(fl
since
p, extends to an ele-
M(B) and
,...,f n1 = 0 (fl ,...,fn) CI
F(gz)= z.
If B is a uB-algebra, then B is isomorphic t o @ by theorem (1.2.10) and it i s easy t o check that h
B, f
P(o(f l,...,fn)) ->
foF
->
i s in fact an isometry. Remark. Iffl,
0
...,fn are arbitrary
general o(f l....,fn)
is not polynomial l y convex.
For example set OD = { x x ->
elements of a B-algebra 8, then in
c
C
:
1x1 = 11, B = C(OD) and
z : OD ->
C.
x. then o ( z ) = OD is not polynomially convex.
(1.3) The Shilov boundary (1.3.1) Let K be a compact Hausdorff space, and l e t B be a pointseparating closed subalgebra of C(K). which contains the constants. By (1.2.4) K can be identified with j(K) tended t o an element
?E @
c
c
M(B) and each f
E
B can be ex-
C(M(B)) by theorem (1.2.10). So M(B)
can be interpreted as the "largest space" t o which a l l elements of
B can be extended in such a way that B i s isomorphic t o the algebra of the extended functions. (This w i l l become clearer in (4.2)). I t is natural t o ask whether there exists a "minimal" compact set
L
c
K such that B is isomorphic to ElL=
{IL:f
E
B).
This question can be answered by introducing the Shiiov boundary. Definition. Let B be a B-algebra. A closed subset E boundary for 8 if each
?I
h
c
M(B) i s a
B assumes i t s maximum modulus on E.
19
Shilov boundary
(1.3.2) Remark. i) In particular M(B) is a boundary for B. ii) Let (B,K) be a uB-algebra. Then
IIfllK = for a l l f
sup{if(x)l
:
x
K) =
Q
ll?llM~B~
B by (1.2.10). Hence j(K) is a boundary f o r B, where j de-
E
notes the map introduced in (1.2.4). the closed unit disc. Then each closed set
Example. Denote by E
c
5 which
contains the set (1x1 = 1) is a boundary for P(E) by the
maximum modulus principle.
(1.3.3) Theorem. The intersection of a l l (closed) boundaries for B is a boundary for B.
(1.3.4) Lemma. Let f l ,....f,
v
= {cp
M(B)
:
Q
B and set
17(cp)i < I , i=1,
...,n).
Then either V meets every boundary for B or E\V is a boundary f o r B f o r every boundary E for B. Proof. Suppose there exists a boundary E for 6 such that E\V is not a boundary f o r 8. Hence there is f
E
B such that
A
ll?llM(B)= 1 > ~~f~I,-\,,.
Replacing f by A
a suitable power fm if necessary, we can assume that ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ E \ , , j = l,...,n.
If cp
E
E n V , then
IP(cp)i;(cp)l < I. j=l. ...,n, by the definition of V. Since E is a boundary f o r B we get A n
IIf
(*I Let cp
E
= llf-fjllE< 1, j=1, ...,n. A A
M(B) such that If(cp)l = 1. Suppose that cp
there is j
r
(1. ....n) so that
Ifj (cp)i
L
1, hence
Q
M(B)\V. Then
If.?I (cp)l
2
1, and we
20
Chapter 1
get a contradiction t o ~ It follows that tcp E M(B)
A
~ :
< 1.~
~
i f (911 = 1)
f c
~
~
~
~
(
B
V. so V meets every bound-
ary for B.
0
Proof of theorem (1.3.3). Let f
S = {cp
E
M(B)
:
B be an arbitrary element and set
E
= ~~?~~M(B)l.
i?(cp)i
Denote by yB the intersection of a l l boundaries for B. Suppose S E
n yB
=
0. Then for each cp E S, there exists a boundary
for B such that cp
M(B)\EO. Since E is closed we find by cp (1.2.2) (*I an open neighbourhood V of cp of the form described in cp the lemma such that V f l E = 0. Since S is compact there are c p ( Q cpl.....cpr so that (Q
s
c
v,
E
u ... u Vqr
Using the lemma r-times we see that M(B)\(V boundary for B. a contradiction. Hence S
U
91
n yB
*
... U V'r
1 is a
0, i.e. yB
*
0 and
yB is a boundary for 8.
0
(1.3.5) Definition. The set yB is called the Shilov boundary of B. Examples. i) Denote by
5 the
y P 6 ) . More generally l e t K
closed unit disc, then t 1x1 = 1 1 = C be a polynomially convex compact
c
set. Then yP(K) equals the topological boundary of K, which we denote by t3K ([GAM] p.27, [STO] p.277). ii) I f K c C is a compact set. then yR(K) = t3K ([GAM] p.27. [STO]
p.277). (1.3.6) Proposition. Let A be a B-algebra. Then i f f for each neighbourhood U of
(Q
(Q
is contained in yA
in M A ) there exists ,f
that
ll?ullu=
sup tI?,C$)l
:
$
E
U) > ll?ullM(A),u.
E
A so
~
Shilov boundary Proof.1) Let p
E
21
yA. Suppose there exists a neighbourhood U o f p
such that A
IlfllM(A),u
II?II,
for a l l f
t
A.
Then M ( A ) \ U is a boundary for A. hence U
n yA
= 0 , a contradiction.
ill Suppose that for each neighbourhood U of cp there is ,f
t
A so
that
l?,llu > ll?ullM(A),u* Then y A
nU*
0 for a l l neighbourhoods U of p. It follows that
cp c yA. since y A is closed.
0
(1.3.7) Lemma. Let A be a B-algebra. f topologlcal boundary of ?(M(A))
E
A. then ?(yA) contains the
.
Proof. We denote by d?(M(A)) the topological boundary of ?(M(A)). Suppose there exists X c d?(M(A))\?(yA). Since ?(yA) i s a compact subset, there is (2:
Choose Xo
E
E
> 0 such that
it-XI
4 / ~for a l i IJJ
n yA
=
0.
E
S, 0
22
Chapter 1
(1.3.8) Defintion. Let B be a B-algebra. i) A point p
E
M(B) i s called strong boundary point ( o r p-point) for
B if for every neighbourhood V of cp there exists an element f n
ll?ll,,,,~Bl=
such that
A
f(cp) = 1 and fI,l
i?(t))l
< 1 for
JI
E
B
< 1.
ii) p is called a peak point for B iff there is f
and
E
L
B so that ?(p) = 1
M(B)\(p).
Example. Set dD = { x o C : i x i = 1). Each point elt, 0
L
t < 2 x , is a
peak point for P(E) (consider the functions (1 + ~ . e - ~ ~ ) / 2 ) . (1.3.9) We f i r s t show that in general not every point of the Shilov boundary is a peak point. Example. Set K =
x ( 0 ) U ( 0 ) x C0.11 c
4:2 .
Denote by z1,z2 the coordinate functions. We show that K is polynomialiy convex. We prove more generally that if Ki convex compact sets then K = K1 x
... x
Kr
c
.
n1+. .+n,
C
4:
is polynomial l y convex, too. Let x = (xl W.1.o.g.
,...,xr),
x1 c Cnl
C"1 , i = l,...,r, are polynomially
.
n I+. .+n xi o Cni, be a point in 4:
\ K,.
\ K.
Hence there exists a polynomial p so that
ip(xl)i > llpllK,. Set q(y 1
V..
*Yn +
...+nr 1 = P(Y l.....Ynll.
Consider the algebra P(K). We have M(P(K)) = K by (1.2.4) ill. Each point of d 5 x ( 0 ) is a peak point for P(K) (cf. example (1.3.8)
and
replace z by zl). The same Is true fo r a l l points (0.y). O < y r l (consider for example l - ( ~ ~ - y ) Hence ~).
S hi1ov boundary
dD x (01 U (01 x C0,lI
23
yP(K)
c
since yP(K) is a closed subset of K. Now l e t f c P(K) be an arbitrary element. Then flEx
B, b ->
exp(b),
is continuous, since
and the la st expression tends t o zero as llbll tends to zero. (1.4.5) We give some applications of the holomorphic calculus. Theorem (Oka-Well). Let K
c
Cn be a polynomially convex compact
set. Then every function holomorphic in a neighbourhood of K can be approximated uniformly on K by polynomials.
If K
c
Cn is a rationally convex compact set, i.e. M(R(K)) = K. then
FIK c R(K) for each function F which is holomorphic in an open neighbourhood of K. ([GAM] p. 84. tST03 p. 368).
(1.4.6) Shilov idempotent theorem that E
f
L
c
.
Let B be a B-algebra. Suppose
M(B) is an open and closed set. Then there is a unique
B such that f2 = f and
f
is the characteristic function o f E.
Functional calculus
29
([GAM] p. 88, [STOI p. 75). Remark. Let B be a uB-algebra such that M(B) is a totally dlsconnected space. Let x.y, x*y , be two points of M(B). Choose an open and closed neighbourhood U of x such that y c M(B)\U. Then there exists
? c 8 such
functions in
that
?I,
= 1 and
?IH(B),U
= 0, 1.e. the real-valued A
separate the points of M(B) and we get C(M(B)) = B
by the theorem of Stone-Weierstrass. (1.4.7) Theorem. Let B be a B-algebra. f that f=exp(hl. Then there exists g
E
E
B and h c C((M(B)) so
B such that f = exp(g) and h=e.
( C f . the proof of corollary 8.22. CSTOl p. 80). (1.4.8) Theorem (Arens-Royden). Let B be a B-algebra. and l e t h c C(M(B))'l.
Then there exist f c
and g c C(M(B)) such that
h = fexp(g). ([GAM] p. 89). (1.4.9) The next theorem, due to Rossi, is also based on deep methods of the theory of several complex variables.
Definition. Let B be a B-algebra.
1) A closed subset E c M(B) is called local peak set provided there is
?
IPI
=
o
C is holomorphic i f f for j = I ,
....n.
35
General theory of holomorphlc functions For z = ( z l , ...,zn)
C n and r = (rl,...,rn) c
E
DZpr = {(yl,...,yn)
For v = (vl
,...,v n1 e N:,
...-vn!,
v! =vl!*
Cn
E
8
iyl
- zil
z = (zl ,...,zn)
E
zv = zn :1 ;..
.:R
define
< rip i=l,...,d.
Cn and f
c
Hol(G) set
,
dV1+...+vnf
DVf =
"; ... dvn zn
We can now state Cauchy's integral formula: Let w = (wl
,...,wn)
c
G, r = (rl ,...,rn) c
lR: such that the closure of
DWpr Is contained In G. then
for a l l v = (v,
,...,vn)
E
n z = No.
(zl
,...,zn)
E
D and f w .r
E
Hol(G1.
(2.1.4) As a consequence o f Cauchy's integral formula we get the
following estimate: Let K r = (rl
.....rn) w," E
c
G be a compact subset, and l e t
such that the compact set
Kr = t(zl ,...,z 1
E Cn: There exists (yl n lyl-zli s rl for l=l. nl
....
Is contained In G, then IIDVfllK s v!llfll
Kr
/rV
,...,yn)
E
K such that
36
Chapter 2
for a l l v c N ,:
f c Hol(G). where
IIfllKr =
sup{lf(x)l: x
c
Kr).
(2.1.5) As in the case n=l we have a power series representation of holomorphic functions. For x = (x, ,..., xn) c C n set 1x1 = (Ixll Let
c
,...,l x n l ) ,
n a zv be a power series ( a, c 41 for a l l v c No 1
vcN: which converges at x with respect t o a fixed order of summation. Then
c avzv converges absolutely and uniformly on each compact
subset of Do,,xl t o a limit that is Independent of the order of summation.
If 1x1 c RY, then
c avzV defines
an element of H o I ~ D o , l x l ~Vice ,
( x c 43". versa if f is holomorphic on a polydisc D x,r the Taylor series of f
r c R",), then
t o f. converges uniformly on each compact subset K o f D x,r
(2.1.6) Identity Theorem. Let
G
c
C" be a domain. If f c H o l ( G ) van-
ishes on a nonempty open subset o f G then f vanishes identically.
G if f vanishes on a sequence (an)n in G, which converges t o a point a c G.
Remark Note that in the case n,l f must not vanish on
Take for example
G
= C
2 , an = (O.l/n) and f = z,, the f i r s t coordi-
nate function. (2.1.7) We denote by C(G) the algebra of a l l complex-valued continuous functions on G. We have Hol(G)
c
C(G) by (2.1.2).
Theorem. Let f c C(G) and l e t (fmIm c Hol(G) be a sequence which converges compactly t o f, i.e. (fmIm converges uniformly on each
General theory of holomorphic functions compact set K
c
G to f. then f
E
Hol(G).
(2.1.8) Open-mapping Theorem. Let G f
E
37
c
Cn be a domain, and l e t
Hol(G) be a nonconstant function. Then f(G) is an open subset
c.
of
(2.1.9) Maximum principle. Let G
c
Cn be a domain, f
E
Hol(G) and
l e t K c G be a compact subset such that there exists a point a
E
int(K) with I f ( a ) l = 111 f1,
= sup {If(z)l: z
E
K). Then f is constant.
Remark. We conclude from the maximum principle that
Ilfll,
=
11f11,,
for each compact set K
c
G and each f
E
Hol(G). where dK denotes
the boundary of K. (2.1.10) As in the one dimensional case sums, products and complex multiples of holomorphic functions are holomorphic. Hol ( G I is thus a commutative algebra whose unit element is the function with constant value 1. We consider the algebra Hol(G) in greater detail. First we endow Hol(G) with the compact open topology. I f K
c
G is a compact set.
then llf+gIl,
IIfll,
Ilfll,
Ilfgll,
+
11g11.,
11g11,
for a l l f.g
E
Hol(G), A
i.e the mapping
II-II,
:
Hol(G) ->
R, f ->
IIfII,,
defines a submultiplicative seminorm (cf. (3.1.4)).
C.
Chapter 2
30
An open neighbourhoodbasis o f f
E
Hol(G) (wlth respect to the com-
pact open topology) i s given by a l l sets of the f o r m (9 e Hol(G)
:
IIf-gIIK
O.
(2.1.11) We can descrlbe the compact open topology in another way. Let
...Km c Km+l
c
... be a countable compact exhaustion of G such
that Km c int Km+, for a l l m
E
N
(where lnt Km+, denotes the interior
of Km+, 1. Then the sequence of seminorms
(11.11
topology on Hol (GI. A neighbourhoodbasis of f
bm generates a
Km E
Hol (GI i s given
by the sets
It is easily seen that
pology
(II-II Imgenerates Km
just the compact open to-
. Moreover
defines a metric on Hol(G) which generates the compact open topology (cf. tKoT3, p. 205). The operations
C x Hol(G)
Hol(G), (X,f) ->
If,
Hol(G) x Hol(G)-->
Hol(G), (f,g) ->
f+g,
Hol(G) x Hol(G) ->
Hol(G), (f,g) ->
fg,
are continuous. so Hol(G) is a metrizabie topologlcai algebra (cf. (3.1.5) for the definition). Let (fmIm be a Cauchy sequence in Hol(G). that means that f o r each k
E
N
(f,lKk),
Since (C(KC),II.((
is a Cauchy sequence in C(Kk). is a complete vector space and since Kk
39
General theory of holomorphic functions
Kk c int Kk+l
f o r a l l k c N it follows that (fm)m converges com-
pactly to a continuous function f. hence f c Hol(G) by (2.1.7). So
Hol ( G I is a complete metrizable topological algebra. Such algebras are called Frechet algebras ( cf. (3.1.5)).
(2.1.12) Since the coordinate functions are holomorphic. we find f o r each pair of points a.b c G. a+b, an element f c Hol(G) w i t h f(a)*f(b). We say that Hol(G) separates the points of G. Pointseparating subalgebras of C(X), X a a-compact and locally compact space, which are complete with respect t o the compact open topology w i l l be called uniform Frechet algebras, cf. (4.1.2). Hence Hol(G) is a uniform Frechet algebra.
(2.1.13) Using the maximum principle we show that Hol(G1 i s not a Eanach algebra. For simplicity assume that G i s a domain. Recall that a subset E of a topological linear space i s called bounded if f o r each neighbourhood U of zero there exists p>O such that
B c pU = {pf
:
f c U).
Suppose that Hol(G) is a Eanach algebra, i.e. there is a norm
II*II
which generates the compact open topology. Set
E = (f c Hol(G)
:
11f11
(
1).
Then B is a bounded subset o f Hol(G). Since B is a neighbourhood of zero, there exists a compact set K c G and 00 so that
according t o the definition of the compact open topology. Choose a compact set L c G with K c i n t L and l e t f nonconstant function, w.1.o.g. mum principle. For n c N set
Ilfll, =
1. Then
llfll,
)
c
Hol(G) be a
1 by the maxi-
40
Chapter 2
gn = f"
- a/2.
Then gn c B f o r a l l n c N by (*I. Now consider
w
= {f
IIfII,
O such that B C pW. since llgnll, tends t o = for n -> =. Hence B cannot be bounded. (2.1.14) Montel's Theorem. Let F
c
Hol(G) be a bounded set. 1.e. for
each compact set K c G there exists M, sup
{IIfll,
:
f s
FI
6
M .,
> 0 such that
Then F is a relatively compact subset of
Hol (GI. Remark.A Frechet space is called Montel space if each bounded subset is relatively compact. So Hol(G) is a Montel space. Since the unit ball in a normed space
E is relatively compact iff E is finite dimensional, we conclude that there are no infinite dimensional normed Montel spaces. We could have used this observation t o show that Hol(G) i s not a Banach al gebra. (2.1.15)We use Montel's Theorem t o show that Hol(G) Is a Schwartz algebra. We s ta r t w i t h the definition of a Schwartz space. Let E be a Frechet space and l e t (pJn be a sequence of seminorms which defines the topology o f E. W.1.o.g.
we can assume that
pn(a) s pn+,(a) for a l l a c E and a l l n e N, cf. [KOT] p. 205. Set Nk = {a
E
E
:
Pk(a) = 0 )
and l e t Ek be the completion of E/Nk wlth respect to the norm
General theory of holomorphic functions Each Ek is a Banach space. Since pk
41
pk+l we get f o r m > k natural
linear maps @k,:
> -, Ek, a + N
E/N,->
a + Nk '
is continuous we can extend it to Em.
Since @ k,,
We denote the extended map again by @k,. chet Schwartz space i f f f o r each k
E
E w i l l be called a F r 6 -
N there is m(k) > k such that
@m(k).k is a compact operator, i.e. the image of every bounded subset of Em(k) is relatively compact in Ek.
Cn be an open set, Choose a compact exhaustion
Now l e t G
C
... c
Km+l
K,
c
c
defines (II-II Im Km
...
of G so that Kmc int Km+l
for a l l m
a
N. Then
the topology o f Hol(G) by (2.1.11).
CI aim: @ k +,k l : Hol(G)k+l
Hol(GIk i s a compact operator, hence
->
Hol ( G I is a Frechet Schwartz algebra. We f i r s t note that
fl
Int K k + l
6
Hol(int Kk+l) for a1 I f
0
HOl(G)k+l
by (2.1.7). Let (fmIm be an arbitrary bounded sequence in Hol(G)k+l. W.1.o.g. we can assume that each ,f
i s the restriction of an ele-
ment o f Hol (GI. Then a subsequence (fmlllntKk+l 1I converges compactly to f a Hol(int Kk+l)
by Monte1 's theorem. Hence @k+l,k(fml), converges
in Hol(G)k and our claim i s proved.
(2.2)Anal v t ic continuat ion (2.2.1) We now turn to a phenomenon in the theory of several complex variables, which is unknown in the one dimensional theory. As was f i r s t recognized by Hartogs there are domains G in 4:
such that
each holomorphic function on G can be extended t o a holomorphic
42
Chapter 2
function on a larger domain. As for B-algebras we shall introduce the notion of the spectrum of the algebra Hol(G) and discuss the connection with the extension problem. Consider the domain X = C2\{Ol. Let f tion. For (tl,z2)
Do,l = {(z,w)
E
:
E
Hol(X) be an arbitrary func-
i z i < l , i w i < l l set
Then F c Hol(Do,,) since the integration and differentiation with respect t o 7 (j=1.2) may be carried out in any order. By the Cauchy
I
integral formula for holomorphic functions of one variable F = f on the set Do,, \I(z.w)
2-01.
Hence F = f on Do,,\IOl
?(z) =
I
by (2.1.6) and we see that
F(z)
if
z
E
Do,l
f(z)
if
z
E
C2\D0.,
defines an element of Hol(C2 1 such that
31c2\101 = f.
Denote by r the restriction mapping r
:
H~I(C 2 1 ->
HOI(C2\to,),
f ->
flc2\(01.
Then r is a continuous algebra homomorphism. It is surjective, as noticed above, and it is injective by (2.1.6). Hence r is a topological and algebraical isomorphism by the open mapping theorem for Fr6chet spaces (cf. B 1). We say that a domain
G
containing G is a holomorphic extension of
G if the restriction mapping r is a (topological) isomorphism. It is natural t o ask whether t o a given domain G there exists a
"largest" holomorphic extension
G
(the holomorphic envelope of GI,
resp. to characterize those domains G C Cn which admit no proper
43
Holomorphic extension holomorphic extension .Such domains are called domains of holomorphy. Remark. Each domain G
c
C is a domain of holomorphy.
(Consider the set S = f l / ( z - x )
:
x a dGI
c
Hol(G). Let
5
0 G be an
arbitrary domain containing G. Then clearly S is not contained in r(Hol(g)).)
(2.2.2 1 Before we answer the questions posed above we r e c a l l the definition of a complex manifold. Let U
C
Cn be an open set. We say that a mapping
f = (f,,...,f,):
Cm i s holomorphic if fi
U ->
E
,...,m.
Hol(U) for i = 1
Definition. a) Let X be a Hausdorff space. Then X is called a complex manifold of dimension n i f there i s a family (Uiscpi,Vi)iar
is an open covering of X and each Vi is an open sub-
i)(Ui)iaI set o f
such that
cn. Vi is a homeomorphism for a l l i
ii) ‘pi: Ui ->
cp (U 1 -> I ii 0 for i,j
iii) piocp;’:
*
U =U nu ii i i atlas for X.
E
I,
cp (U 1 is a holomorphic map.whenever I il E
1. The system (Ui.ipI,Vi)iEI
is called an
b) A complex structure on X is a maximal atlas A = (Ui,cpi,Vi)iEr. Elements of A are called coordinate systems. c) A function f : X -> each x x
E
E
C is called holomorphic provided that for
X there exists a coordinate system (UI”pi.Vi)
Ui and focpi-’
E
Hol(VI)
such that
. The set o f a l l holomorphic functions on
X w i l l be denoted by Hol(X1. d) Let X resp. Y be an n-dimensional resp. m-dimensional complex
(cjs;j,?j)jaJ.
manifold w i t h atlas (Ui,cpisVi)iaI
resp
A continuous function f : X ->
Y is said t o be holomorphic if
44
Chapter 2
is holomorphlc for a l l i c I, j
L
J whenever f
-1
nd
(Uj)flUi
*
0
.
e l A connected complex manifold X is called Riemann domain over 43" if there exist p1....#pn c Hol(X) so that the map
43", x
p:X-->
-'
(p,(x)
#...#
pn(x))
is a local homeomorphism. I n this case p is called realization map.
Remarks. i) Let U c Cn, W
c
a biholomorphic map f : U ->
Cm be open subsets. Suppose there Is
W, then n = m. It follows that the
dimension of a complex manifold i s well-defined. ii) If (X,p) is a Riemann domain over Cn then the set o f all triples
(U,plu.p(U))
such that plu i s a homeomorphism is an atlas f o r X .
Note that in particular each domain of Cn is a Riemann domain over
a!". iii) We shall only consider complex manifolds X which have a count-
able topology and which are holomorphically separable. i.e. f o r each pair of distinct points x.y c X there is f c Hol(X) so that f ( x ) * f ( y ) . In this case Hol(X) i s again a uniform Fr6chet algebra, when endowed with the compact open topology and (2.1.6)
-
(2.1.15) remain valid.
If X i s connected and holomorphically separable then X has a countable topology, c f . [K/K]
p. 228. In particular each holo-
morphical l y separable Riemann domain has a countable topology. Every domain G
c
Cn i s holomorphically separable since distinct
points o f G can be separated by the coordinate functions. We remark that not every Rlemann domain over Cn Is holomorphlcally separable. iv) By (2.1.8) a l l holomorphic functions on a compact complex mani-
f o l d are necessarily constant, hence Riemann domains over Cn cannot be compact spaces. (2.2.3) We return t o the questlons posed in (2.2.1). As known from
45
Holomorphic extension
the one variable theory there are holomorphic functions on domains
G
c
4: which have no largest domain of definition in C. Take for ex-
ample f i o n
C\{Re(z)aO, Im(z)=Ol. This leads t o the definition of
Riemann surfaces. For n > l it may even happen that every holomorphic function on a domain G
C
Cn can be extended t o a holomorphic func-
tion on a Riemann domain over Cn. which cannot be realized as domain in
c".
For an example cf. for instance CG/Rl. p. 43. Hence it
makes sense to consider the extension problem in the class of Riemann domains over Cn. Definition a) A Riemann domain (Y,p) over Cn is a holomorphic extension of a Riemann domain (X,q) over Cn i f there is a holomorphic map u : X ->
Y so that
is bijective. b) ARiemann domain (E(X1.G) over Cn is called an envelope of holomorphy of (X.p) i) i f there exists u : X ->
E(X), so that (E(X1.G) is a holomorphic
extension of X with respect t o u ; ii) if
B: X
->
Y defines another holomorphic extension of X. there
is a uniquely determined holomorphic map y : Y ->
E(X) so that the
diagram
X
a
is commutative. iii) (X,lr)
is called a domain of holomorphy if X = E(X).
Remarks. i) The envelope of holomorphy E(X) is a holomorphic extension of every other holomorphic extension of X. The uniqueness of y guarantees that E(X) is uniquely determined up to biholomorphism. ii) If Y is a holomorphic extension of X via the map a. then a* is a
46
Chapter 2
topological algebra homomorphism by the open mapping theorem f or Fr6chet spaces. iii) C2 is a holomorphfc extension o f C2\{Ol via the map
a
:
C ~ \ { O I->
~ 2 x,->
x,
as was proved in (2.2.1). i v ) We shall consider in (4.2) the extension problem in the general
setting of uF-algebras.
(2.2.4) It was shown by Thullen that every Riemann domain (X,a) over Cn has an envelope of holomorphy E(X). One is inclined to ask how t o construct E(X). This is the point where the spectrum o f the algebra Hol(X) comes into account. Let Y be a holomorphic extension of the Riemann domain (X.p) over Cn via the map a. Then fo r each y a Y
a
Y
:
Hoi(X1 ->
C , f ->
(a*)-'(f)(y),
defines a continuous nonzero algebra homomorphism on Hol (XI. Hence w e get a map from Y Into M(Hol(X)), the space of a l l nonzero continuous complex-valued algebra homomorphisms on Hol (XI, by Y ->
M(Hol(X)) , y ->
a Y'
and it is reasonable t o conjecture that E(X) = M(Hol(X)) if we can give M(Hol(X)) the structure of a Riemann domain over Cn. Definition. i) Let X be a holomorphically separable complex manifold with a countable topology. Then we denote by M(Hol(X)) the set of a l I nonzero compiex-val ued continuous algebra homomorphisms on Hol(X1. We endow M(Hol(X)) with the relative weak* topology.Note that M(Hol(X)) is a subset of the topological dual space of Hol(X). ii) Let f
E
Hol(X). then
P: M(Hol(X)) ->
C , cp ->
cp(f1,
47
Hol omorphic extension is called the Gelfand transform o f f. The algebra of a l l Gelfand transforms of Hol(X) w i l l be denoted by Hol(XlA.
Remarks. i) The weak* topology on M(Hol(X)) i s the weakest topoh
logy such al I elements of Hol (X)
become continuous functions.
ii) The map j with
(px(f)
j*
:
X ->
M(Hol(X)), x ->
= f ( x ) for a l l f :
Hol (XIA ->
t
9,.
Hol(X) is injective and continuous and
Hol (XI. f ->
A
f 0 j.
is a topological algebra homomorphism, where Hol(X)"
is endowed
with the compact open topology. The inverse mapping is given by Hol(X) ->
P. cf.
A
Hol(X) , f ->
(4.1.3).
(2.2.5) Let (X,p) be a Riemann domain over C" (with countable topology). Recall that if p = (p
,,...,p,).
then pi
E
Hol(X) for i=1,
was shown by Igusa/Remmert/Iwahashi/Forster
...,n.
It
that E(X) is topolo-
gical l y just the spectrum M(Hol(X)). Rossi introduced an analytic structure into M(Hol(X)) making it to a Riemann domain over Cn. The realization map is given by
p^ where
6,
:
M(Hol(X)) ->
Cn.
(p
->
A
(~l((p)....,pn((p)~,
denotes the Gelfand transform of pi (i=l, ...,n).
With this structure we have M(Hol(X)) = E(X). Moreover the holomorphic maps on E(X) are just the Gelfand transforms of Hol(X). So we have answered the f i r s t question o f (2.2.1).
(2.2.6) We turn to the second question: Which properties characterize the Riemann domains (X,rr) which agree with their envelope of hol omorphy?
40
Chapter 2
Defintion. Let X be a complex manifold.
i) X is called holomorphically convex provided that for each compact subset K the holomorphically convex hull RHol ( X I
= {x
E
X
:
If(x)l s
IIfII,
for a l l f c Hol(X)l
is a compact subset of X. ii) X is called Stein (manifold) iff X is holomorphically separable and
holomorphical l y convex. Remarks. 1)Let
Kc
Cn be an arbitrary compact subset.Then R H o l ( C n )
is a closed subset of Cn by the definition. Choose r > O so that
K c Do,r = t(xl and l e t y = (yl
,...,yn)
,...,xn)
E
C : Ixll IIz,II, where z1 denotes the f i r s t coordinate 1 1 c Do,r a 1..' RHoi(X) is a compact subset of function, hence
RHO,
41" and Cn Is holomorphically convex. It was proved by Oka that the envelope of holomorphy o f a Riemann
domain over Cn is Stein. Vice versa, if (X,rr) is Stein then E(X) = X. Even stronger: If (X.A) is holomorphically convex, then (X,lr) is holomorphical l y separable, hence Stein, and E(X) = X. Remark. It follows from this theorem and our earlier observations that C 2 is the envelope of holomorphy o f 4:2 \to}. (2.2.7) Theorem. Let (X,n) be a Riemann domain over Cn. Then the following statements are equivalent: i) X is a domain of holomorphy;
ii) X i s t Stein; iii) X is holomorphical l y convex; iv) the natural map j: X ->
M(Hol(X1). c f . remark (2.2.4111)
Holomorphic extension
49
is a homeomorphism ; v l f o r every sequence (x m Im without accumulation point
there exists f
c
Hol(X) such that sup{lf(xm)l: m
E
IN) = a;
vi) X is holomorphically separable and f o r every finite set of functions fl.....fr
E
Hol(Xl without common zero on X
there exist gl. ...,gr
E
Hol(Xl such that
r
c
i=l
gifi = 1.
I n this case we say that the weak Nullstellensatz is valid f o r Hol(X1. Remark. We shall consider later the properties mentioned in iii) vi) f o r uniform Fr6chet algebras. c f . chapter 4 and (7.3).
Examples.We give t w o important examples of domains of holomorphy. i) We say that a domain G
c
C n is polynomially convex provided that A
the polynomially convex h u l l K (cf. (1.2.4)iil) set K
c
of every compact sub-
G is contained in G. Since each polynomial (restricted t o G)
is a holomorphic function on G, we see that every polynomially convex domain is in particular holomorphical l y convex. ii) A domain G each
c
61" is c a l l e d a complete Reinhardt domain if f o r
( X l....,~nl E G the
{(y,, ...,y
c
set
c":
,...,n)
1y.1 i ix.1. i = 1 I I
is contained in G. A complete Reinhardt domain is c a l l e d logarithmically convex if the set {(logixli
,...,logixnl):
(xl
,...,xn)
E
G. xi
*
....,n)
0 for i = 1
is a convex subset o f Rn.
Let G be a complete Reinhardt domain. Denote by
6
the intersection
of al I logarithmical i y convex complete Reinhardt domains which con-
tain it. Then
is a logarithmically convex complete Reinhardt do-
main and the Taylor series
Chapter 2
50
o f each f c Hol(G) converges uniformly on compact subsets of an element that
5
r"
c Hol(z1. Since
?lG = f by (2.1.5)
5
to
and (2.1.6) we see
is a hoiomorphic extension o f G. I n fact a complete Reinhardt
domain is a domain o f holomorphy iff it is logarithmically convex resp. iff it is polynomially convex. Flnally we state that the domain of convergence of a power series
C avzv is
a logarithmicai ly convex complete Reinhardt domain.
(2.3)Stein spaces (2.3.1) Next we consider complex spaces, which in general have no longer the structure o f a complex manifold. (To keep the text elementary we avoid sheaf theory throughout this book .I Definition. a) Let G c Cn be a domain. A closed subset X of G is called an analytic subset of G i f fo r each x
E
X there exists a neigh-
bourhood U of x in G and a family F of holomorphic functions on U so that
XnU = WF) = { x c U: f(x) = 0 for a i l f b) A continuous function f : X -> x
E
-
E
C is called holomorphic if for each
X there exists a neighbourhood U of x in G and
- flxn".
that fixn"
F).
r"
c
Hol(U) such
We denote by Hol(X) the algebra o f a l l holomorphic functions on X. Let X
c
G
c
f = (f,,...fm):
Cn and X' c G' c Cm be two analytic subsets and l e t X ->
X' be a continuous function.
Then f is called holomorphic if fi c Hol(X). i = 1,
...,m.
c) Let X be a Hausdorff space. Then X is called a reduced complex space if there exists a family (Ui,tpi,Xi)icI
so that
51
Stein spaces
i) (Ul)lcI is an open covering of X and each Xi i s an analytic
subset of a domain GI c C"i
.
Xi i s a homeomorphism for a l l i
ii) pi: Ui ->
iii) cp 00-1: cp (U 1 -> i i 111
E
I,
cp (U 1 i 11 is a holomorphic function whenever U = U l n U ii I 0 for i,j E I. The algebra of a i l holomorphic functions on X is denoted by Hol(X). Remarks. i) Note that if G
c
*
Cn i s a domain then G i t s e l f is an ana-
lytic subset o f G, hence a complex manifold is in particular a r e duced complex space. ill Consider the analytic subset X = {(z.w) c C2: z-w = 01. Then X
looks in most points
-
precisely in a l l points o f X\{(O.O))
-
like a
complex manifold. This statement remains true for arbitrary reduced complex spaces X. A point x
E
X is called regular if there exists a neighbourhood U o f
x in X such that U is biholomorphically equivalent to a domain in
some Cn, otherwise x is called singular. The set of a l l singular points of X is a nowhere dense (analytic) subset of X. iii)As in the case of manifolds we only consider hoiomorphically separable (analogous definition as in remark (2.2.2)iii)) reduced complex spaces which have a countable topology. I f X is holomorphically separable and connected then X has automatically a countable topology, c f . [K/K]
p. 228. Hol(X), when endowed with the compact open
topology, is again a uniform Fr6chet algebra. We note that the identity theorem (2.1.6) does not hold for arbitrary analytic subsets. For example l e t X be as in ii) and consider the hoiomorphic function z:X ->
C . (x.y) ->
x. Then z vanishes on an
open subset o f X but does not vanish identically. However the identity theorem holds for irreducible analytic subsets. (An analytic subset X c G
c
Cn i s called irreducible if whenever X
Chapter 2
52
i s the union of two analytic subsets X1, X2 then either X = X1 or
x
= X2.)
The analogous statements t o (2.1.71, (2.1.8). remark (2.1.9) and
(2.1.13)
- (2.1.15)
remain true. (A proof of the analogous statement
of (2.1.15) w i l l be given in (2.3.8) below.)
(2.3.2) We shortly consider the extension problem for reduced complex spaces. If we replace in (2.2.6) the term
"
complex manifold"
by "reduced complex space", then we get the definitions of a holomorphical l y convex (resp. Stein) reduced complex space. The results differ essentially from that for Riemann domains over Cn. We f i r s t mention that f o r an arbitrary reduced complex space an envelope of holomorphy does not exist in general ( f o r an example cf. [KRA 51). Even if the envelope o f holomorphy exists it must not be a Stein space. The connection between the envelope of holomorphy
E(X) and the spectrum M(Hol(X)) has not been established in the general case. The theorem of Igusa/Remmert/Iwahashi/Forster
however remains
true for arbitrary reduced complex spaces X, 1.e. X is Stein iff the map
j: X ->
M(Hol(X)), x ->
with qx(f) = f ( x ) for a l l f
E
9,
,
Hol(X),is a homeomorphism. If X i s Stein
then E(X) exists and coincides with X. We cannot discuss the importance of the property Stein in detail but state some results, c f . for example [K/K]
5 57.
(2.3.3) Let A be an analytic subset (analogous definition as in (2.3.1)) o f a Stein space X, and l e t f ment. Then there exists
r"
E
a
Hol(A) be an arbitrary ele-
Hol(X) such that
71,
= f.
53
Steln spaces
(2.3.4) The following statements are equivalent for a maximal ideal m c Hol (XI, X a Stein space: i) m is closed in Hol(X); ii) m is finitely generated; iii) there exists x c X so that m = tf
E
Hol(X): f ( x ) = 01.
It was shown by Cartan that each finitely generated ideal I c Hol(X)
is closed, while the converse statement is false ([FOR 31. p. 314). Opposite t o the situation for B-algebras (cf. (1.2.5)) there are "always" maximal ideals m
c
Hol(X), which are not closed. I n con-
nection with this observation there appears the following question: Is every nontrivial algebra homomorphism
'p:
Hol ( X I ->
C automat-
ical l y continuous? This question can be answered in the positive if
X is a finite dimensional Stein space ( f o r a generalization cf. We shall return t o this question for Frechet algebras
-
[EPH]).
known as
Michael's problem - in chapter 10. (2.3.5) Let Y be a reduced complex space, X a Stein space, and l e t cp: Hol(X) ->
Hol(Y) be a continuous algebra homomorphism. Then
there exists a unique holomorphic map f : Y -> for a l l g
c
X so that 'p(g1 = gof
Hol(X1.
(2.3.6) Let X be a Stein space, and l e t Y
c
X be an open subset
h
which i s Hol(X)-convex. i.e. KHo,(X) is contained in Y for each compact subset K
c
Y. then the restriction mapping
Hol(X) ->
Hol(Y), f ->
fly.
has dense range. ((X,Y) is called a Runge pair.)
(2.3.7)We state an approximation result, cf. [FOR 21. Let X be a Stein space and l e t A
- A-separable.
c
Hol(X) be a subalgebra, such that X is i.e. for each pair of distinct points x. y in X
Chapter 2
54 there exists f
-
E
A so that f(x)*f(y),
A-convex, i.e.
RA = ty
E
X: i f ( y ) i
suptif(x)i: x
E
K) f o r a l l f
i s compact for each compact subset K
-
A-regular, 1.e. for each x
E
c
A)
X.
X there are f;,...,f;
E
A, an
open neighbourhood U of x, and an analytic subset Y of an open set in Cr such that
u ->
Y. t ->
(f;(t),...,f;(t)),
is a biholomorphic mapping.
Then A is dense in Hol(X1.
(2.3.8)Finally
- using (2.3.3)and permanence properties of
Schwartz spaces
-
we show that Hol(X1 (X a reduced complex space)
is a Schwartz space.
We mention that subspaces. quotients and products of Schwartz spaces are again Schwartz spaces (cf. [JAR]). First l e t X be an analytic subset of a polycylinder P
c
Cn. One easily
proves that X is holomorphically convex and hence Stein. Set
I = tf
E
Hol(P): fix = 0 )
Then I is a closed subspace of Hol(P) and Hol(P)/I becomes a Fr6chet space when endowed with the quotient topology. Hence Hol(P)/I is a Fr6chet Schwartz space. The map Hol(P)/I ->
fl,
Hol(X), f+I ->
is a continuous and injective linear mapping. It is also surjective by
(2.3.3)and hence a topological isomorphism by the open mapping theorem for Fr6chet spaces. We conclude that Hol(X) i s a FrBchet Schwartz space. Now l e t X be an arbitrary analytic subset of a domain G each x c X choose a polycylinder Px Hol(XnP,)
c
Cn. For
G such that x
E
Px. Since
is a Fr6chet Schwartz space for every x
E
X the same i s
c
55
Stein spaces true for the product
n Hol (XnP,).
Since we can represent Hol(X)
xEX
as a closed subspace of n H o l ( X n P x ) , via the map x EX
Hol(X) is a Fr6chet Schwartz space. too. Let X be a reduced complex space, and l e t (Ui,qJl,Xi)iCl
be as in de-
finition (2.3.1)~). Then Hol(X) can be represented as a closed subspace of the Schwartz space nHol(Xi) via the map id Hol(X)->
nHol(XI), f -> it1
(fa
q~;’),~~
.
Hence Hol(X) is a Fr6chet Schwartz space. Remark. In a similar way one can prove the stronger statement that Hol(X) is a nuclear space (for the definition c f . [JAR]).
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
57
PART 2 GENERAL THEORY OF FRECHET ALGEBRAS
This part is devoted t o the introduction of FrQchet algebras and uniform FrQchet algebras. Important examples of (uniform) FrQchet a l gebras are
-
Hol(X), the algebra of a l l holomorphic functions on a hemicompact
reduced complex space;
- C(X),
the algebra of a l l continuous functions on a hemicompact k-
space. It is an important tool in our theory t o represent each FrQchet alge-
bra as the projectlve limit of a sequence of Banach algebras. This representation enables us to prove many theorems f o r FrQchet algebras which are known for Banach algebras, e.g. the theorem of Gelfand-Mazur, the holomorphic functional calculus, Shilov's idempotent theorem etc.. However the question as whether each mu1tiplicative linear functional on a Fr6chet algebra is necessarily continuous is s t i l l unanswered. Hence in some cases we have to develope new proofs for theorems, which in the Banach algebra case are a consequence of the automatic continuity of characters. For example we mention the proof of the uniqueness o f topology for semisimple Fr6chet algebras. One significant dlfference appears in connection with the fact that the spectrum of a Frechet algebra in general is no longer a compact but a hemicompact space. The topology of the spectrum is not quite well understood. For example there are FrQchet algebras whose spectrum is not a k-space. We also mention that Rossi's maximum modulus principle f a i l s to be true for Frechet algebras.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
59
CHAPTER 3 THEORY OF FRECHET ALGEBRAS, BASIC RESULTS
We always consider associative and commutative algebras over the field o f complex numbers. Moreover and (3.2)
- we
-
with the exception of (3.1)
shall assume that a l l considered algebras have an
identity 1. (3.1) Fr6chet algebras
I n this section we introduce Fr6chet algebras. By a Frechet algebra A we mean an algebra which space
-
-
considered as a topological vector
is complete metrizable and which has a neighbourhoodbasis
(UiIicN of zero consisting of convex sets Ui such that Ui-Ui all i
t
c
Ui f o r
N. It turns out that the topology o f A can always be defined
by a sequence of multiplicative seminorms. At the end of this section we shall discuss several examples. In particular we shall deal with the question when C(X) - the algebra of a l l continuous functions on a space X. endowed with the compact
open topology
-
is a Fr6chet algebra.
(3.1.1) Recall that by a Banach algebra A we mean a Banach space
A which is also an algebra, in which multiplication and the norm are Iinked by the inequality
IIfgll
Ilfllllgll. f.g
f
A.
Before we generalize this notion in a suitable way for Fr6chet algebras, we r e c a l l some definitions and results which can be found in
Chapter 3
60
any textbook on topological linear spaces, for instance in the books of Kbthe [Kt)TI or Jarchow [JAR]. Definition. Let E be a complex vector space. A subset M c E i s said t o be convex (resp. absolutely convex) if whenever it contains x and
y it contains a l l
TX t
py where t,p
0 and t+p=l (resp. ~ , Ep 4: and
2
i t i t l p l s l ) . T h e absolutely convex h u l l r(M) of a set M c E is the intersection of a l l the absolutely convex sets which contain M. Remark r(M) consists of a l l the terms of the form
n
C lali
1, xi
G
E
cin= lalxi,
al
E
61,
M ([JAR] p. 101, p. 102).
i=l
(3.1.2) Definition. A complex vector space is called topological vect o r space if a Hausdorff topology
is defined on E such that the
t
mappings
E x E ->
E, (x,Y) --+ X+Y,
C x E ->
E, (X,X) ->
and
AX,
are continuous. Remarks. i) If E is a topological vector space, x c E and @ = {U), is a basis of neighbourhoods of zero, then the sets x+Ua. U,
E
@,
form a basis f o r the neighbourhood f i l t e r o f x. ii) A topological vector space is said to be locally convex if it has
a bask of neighbourhoods @ = {U,)
of zero consisting o f convex sets
uciill) A subset M of a vector space E is said t o be absorbent, if for each element x
E
E a suitable multiple px, p>O. lies in M. Note that
every neighbourhood o f zero in a topological vector space is absorbent.
61
Fr6chet algebras (3.1.3)Definition. Let E be a vector space. A map p: E
-*
c0.a~)
is called seminorm if i) p(x+y) s p(x)+p(y) for a l l x,y ii) p(Xx) = IXip(x) for a l l x
Q
E
E, X
E; E
C.
If p i s a seminorm. then the set = t x E E : p(x) s 1) vP is an absolutely convex and absorbent set. Vice versa if U
c
E is an
absolutely convex and absorbent set, then the gauge functional pu(x) = inftp>O: x
pU1
E
defines a seminorm on E ([KOT], p. 182). (3.1.4)Definition. i) Let A be an algebra. A seminorm p: A ->
C0.a~)
is said to be (sub-)multiplicative if p(xy) s p(x)p(y) f o r a l l x.y
E
A.
ii) A subset U c A is called multiplicative if U2 = UU
Remark.Let pl. ...,p,
A->
c
U.
be multiplicative seminorms on A. Then
..
sup{ p, ( x 1 , ..pn (x 11
[ O , O D ) , x ->
defines a seminorm on A which is easily seen t o be multiplicative. The next proposition gives the connection between mu1tip1 icative sets and multiplicative seminorms. Proposition. i) I f p is a multiplicative seminorm on A, then Vp = tx
E
A: p(x)
5
1)
is an absorbent, absolutely convex and multiplicative set. ii) If U is an absolutely convex, absorbent and multiplicative set then
pu(x) = inf{ p>O: x
E
pU)
defines a multiplicative seminorm.
62
Chapter 3
Proof. i) By (3.1.3) we only have to show that V This is the case, since if x.y p(xy) s p(x)p(y)
5
B
V
P
is multiplicative.
then
P'
1.
ii) By (3.1.3) it remains to show that pu is multiplicative.
Let x,y
E
A and a,b>O such that x xy a abU2
aU and y
c
E
bU. Then
abU.
c
hence pu(xy) s ab. and the r e s u l t follows. (3.1.5) Definitlon. i) A topological algebra is an algebra, which is a topological vector space, such that the mu1tiplication
A x A ->
A, (a.b) ->
ab
is a continuous mapping. ii) A topological algebra is called a locally mu1tip1 icatively convex algebra (LMC-algebra) if there is a basis of neighbourhoods o f zero consisting of mu1tiplicative and convex sets. iii) A Frgchet algebra (F-algebra) is an LMC-algebra which is more-
over a complete metrizable topological vector space. Remark.Since we want t o concentrate on F-algebras in this book we do not deal with the more general concept of LMC-algebras. We r e f e r the reader, who is interested in the theory of LMC-algebras, t o the books of Beckenstein e t al. [BNS], Mallios [MALI and Zelazko [ZEL 11. (3.1.6) We now want t o show that the topology o f an F-algebra can be generated by a sequence of mu1tiplicative seminorms. i) Let A be an algebra, and l e t (pnIn be a sequence of multiplicative
seminorms on A such that a) pn(x) L pn+,(x) for a l l n a N, x
a
A;
Fr6chet algebras b) for each x
c
A. x
* 0,there is n
c
63
N such that pn(x)
*
0.
Then (pnIn generates a topology on A in the following way. For x n
E
c
A,
N set Un(x) = {YEA: pn(x-y) < l / n l .
Then @=(Un(x)), is a basis of neighbourhoods of x for a (locally convex) topology on A and A is metrizable ([JAR].
p. 40). By proposition
(3.1.4) each Un(0) i s an absolutely convex and multiplicative set. I t is easy t o show that A is an LMC-algebra. i.e. the multiplication i s continuous, so A becomes an F-algebra i f A is complete. ii) On the other hand every F-algebra arises in this way. Let A be an F-algebra. Since A is metrizable we can choose a basis of neighbourhoods (UnIn of zero consisting of multiplicative and convex sets (cf. [JAR], p. 40). Fix n
E
N. Since A is in particular a lo-
cally convex space we can choose an absolutely convex neighbourhood of zero such that W Uk
c
W. Let x.y
c
c
r(uk) be
Un ([JAR].
p.108). Choose k
c
N so that
two arbitrary elements o f the absolutely
convex hull of Uk. i.e.
I t follows that r ( u k ) i s multiplicative, since
Since r ( U k )
...
3
wk
3
c
W, A has a countable basis of neighbourhoods of zero
Wk+l
3
.... consisting of
absolutely convex and multipli-
64
Chapter 3
cative sets. By proposition (3.1.4) and (3.1.2)iii) every sponds with a multiplicative seminorm p
wk'
because Wk hence p
wk
for a l l k
* P%+,
PWk
3
Wk+,. I f x
E
A, x
E
wk
corre-
We have
N
*
0, there is k such that x
E
A\Wk,
(x) > 0. Finally one sees that the semlnorms (pwk) k ge-
nerate the original topology of A. (3.1.7) Let A be an algebra with identity 1, and l e t (p,), of multiplicative seminorms on A so that pn(l) qJf)
be a sequence
* 0 for a l l n
E
N. Set
= sup{pn(fg): p&g) = 11,
then each q, defines a seminorm on A and qn(l) = 1. Moreover qn(f)
pJf)
and pn(f) c pn(l)qn(f) for a l l n
E
N. f
E
A,
since pn(f.l/pn(l))
* qn(f).
It follows that (qnIn generates the same topology on A as (p,),.
Each qn is multiplicative, since for f,g,h
E
A
pn(fgh) i pn(gh)qn(f) , hence qn(fg) = sup{pn(fgh): pn(h) = 1) i
sup{qn(f)pn(gh): pn(h) = 1)
* qn(f)qn(g).
By remark (3.1.4) q',(f 1 = sup{ql (f1
,...,qJf
1)
defines a multiplicative seminorm on A. Clearly qi
q;l+l,
for n
E
N.
65
Frechet algebras It follows from [KOT]. p. 203 that (q;ln
on A as (q,),.
defines the same topology
Hence the following definition makes sense.
Definition. Let A be an F-algebra. By a generating (or defining) sequence of seminorms for A we mean a sequence of multiplicative seminorms (pnIn on A which generates the topology of A (in the above described way) such that pn s P,+~,
for a l l n
E
El,
and pn(l) = 1, for a l l n
E
N. if A has an identity.
(3.1.8) There is a canonical way of adjoining an identity to an F-algebra A. We denote by A* the direct sum A* = COA = t(X,a): X
E
C, a
E
A)
and define addition and multiplication in A* by
I f (pnIn is a generating sequence of multiplicative seminorms for A then we endow A* with the topology which is generated by the multip l icative seminorms qn(X.a) = pn(a)+lXI, n
E
N.
I t is easily shown that A* becomes an F-algebra and that (1.0) is an
identity. We shall r e f e r to A* as the algebra obtained by adjoining an identity to A. (3.1.9) Examples. i) Of course each B-algebra is an F-algebra. ii) Denote by C"([O,l])
the algebra of a l l infinitely differentiable
functions on the unit interval with pointwise operations. For n define
E
N
Chapter 3
66
pn(f) = 2n-1sup{if(k)(x)i: x
k = 0,1,...,n-1l,
[0,1],
E
where f ( k ) denotes the k-th derivative of f. It can be verified that each pn is a seminorm. By using Lelbniz's r u l e f o r computing the k-th derivative it can be shown that pn is moreover multiplicative. Clearly pl(f) = 0 iff f
*
0. We endow C"([O.l])
with the topology
which is generated by the sequence (p,),. Let (fmIm be a Cauchy sequence in C"([O,l]),
i.e. (fmIm is a Cauchy
sequence with respect to each seminorm pn. It follows for n=l that
(fmImconverges uniformly on [ O , l l to a continuous function g. Since (fmImis a Cauchy sequence with respect t o p.,
the sequence of the
(1) Im derivatives (fm converges uniformly on [O,l]
t o a continuous
function g1 and
-
as is well known
-
g is differentiable and g(')=gl.
Continuing in this manner we see that g converges uniformly on [O,l]
E
C"([O,l])
and (f, (k) Im
t o g(k)s i.e. the topology generated by
the sequence (pnIn is complete, i.e. C"([O,l]) We want to show that C"([O,l])
becomes an F-algebra.
endowed with the above intro-
duced topology is not a B-algebra. Recall f i r s t that a set U in a topological vector space E is called bounded if for each neighbourhood V of zero there is p > O so that U c QV. If
{f
E
E:
(E,II-II)
IIfll
and
l/k~2~k~10~n~k~1~sin~10nx~.
67
Fr6chet algebras i.e. fn
E
U for a l l n
E
N, but
(pl(fn))nEN i s unbounded for every I>k.
Hence U cannot be a bounded neighbourhood of zero, since f o r example there exists no p>O such that
iii) The algebra C(X).
Let X be a Hausdorff space. We denote by C(X) the algebra o f a l l continuous complex-valued functions on X (with pointwise operations).
If K
c
X is a compact subset we define
Ilfll, Obviously
= suptlf(x)i: x
11-11,
E
K).
is a multiplicative seminorm on C(X). We always en-
dow C(X) with the topology which is generated by the seminorms
(ll*llK)K=x compact
*
It is called the compact open topology or topology of uniform con-
vergence on compact sets. A neighbourhoodbasis of zero is given by a l l sets of the form
tf
L
C(X):
IIfII, < €1. E>O, K
c
X compact.
We want to determine a class of spaces such that C(X) becomes an F-algebra. We f i r s t r e c a l l some definitions and results.
A topological space X is called regular if for each point x and each neighbourhood U of x there is a closed neighbourhood V of x such that V
c
U. X is called completely regular if f o r each x
E
X and each
neighbourhood U of x there exists a continuous function f on X t o the closed unit interval such that f ( x ) = 0 and f is identically one on
X\U. A completely regular space is regular.
By a normal space X we mean a space such that for each disjoint pair o f closed sets, A and B, there are disjoint open sets U and V so that A
c
V and B
c
U. By Urysohn’s lemma we find for each dis-
joint pair of closed subsets A,B o f a normal space X a continuous
68
Chapter 3
function f on X t o the unit interval such that f i s zero on A and one on B. Hence normal spaces are completely regular.
By a Lindel6f space we mean a topological space so that each open cover has a countable subcover. Each regular Lindel6f space is normal , in particular compact spaces or topological spaces satisfying the second axiom of countability are normal ([KEL], p. 113). Tietze's Extension Theorem. Let X be a normal space, E be a closed subset, and l e t f be a continuous function on E t o the closed interval [a,b]
g(X)
c
c
R. Then f has a continuous extension g to X such that
[a.b].
([KEL] p. 242).
As a consequence of Tietze's theorem we get another extension theorem for completely regular spaces. Theorem
. Suppose K is a compact subset of the completely regular
space X. If f
E
C(K), then there is g
sup{lg(x)i: x ( Cf. [JAR],
E
e
C(X) extending f such that
X I = llfll,.
p.29 1.
A Hausdorff space is called a k-space i f every subset intersecting each compact subset In a closed set is i t s e l f closed. Note that a complex-valued function f on a k-space X is continuous iff it is continuous on each compact subset of X. Examples of k-spaces are locally compact and f i r s t countable spaces ([KEL], p. 231). Definition. A Hausdorff space X is called hemicompact if there is a countable compact exhaustion each compact subset K
c
... Kn
c
X there is n
Kn+l E
c
... of
N so that K
X such that for c
such an exhaustion (Knln admissible. Remark. Each hemicompact space is a Lindel6f space.
Kn. We c a l l
69
Frechet algebras
Theorem. Let X be a completely regular space. Then C(X) i s an F-algebra iff X i s a hemicompact k-space. Proof. i) Suppose X is a hemicompact k-space. Let (KnIn be an admissible exhaustion of X. The compact open topology is generated by the sequence of seminorms ([Kt)T],
(II-IIK n1n,
i.e. C(X) is metrizable
p. 2 0 5 ) . Let (fn),, be a Cauchy sequence in C(X), i.e. (fnIn
is a Cauchy sequence with respect to each seminorm
11-11
C(Km) is complete with respect t o the norm
Km
I.11 . Since nKm
N
verges uniformly on Km t o a continuous function fm N
f: X ->
C . x ->
fm(x). if x
Then f is well-defined and f l m c
N. Since X
c
Incon-
. Set
Km.
.v
Km
I
, (f
Km
=fm, i.e. fl
i s continuous for each
Km
is a k-space this implies that f c C(X).
ii) Now l e t C(X) be an F-algebra.
Since C(X) is metrizable. there is a countable neighbourhoodbasis o f zero, hence there are a sequence of positive numbers (cnIn and a sequence of compact subsets (KnIn such that
(*I
{f
c
C(X):
IIfllKn< cn)
is a neighbourhoodbasis of zero. We claim that (KnIn i s an admis-
sible exhaustion of X. i.e. X is a hemicompact space.
To see this choose an arbitrary compact subset K
c
X. By (*I there
i s n c N such that
v
= tf
6
C(X): IIfllKn < c,)
Suppose there is a point x there is g g
E
c
E
K\K,.
c
w=
{f
E
C(X):
IIfIIK
1/2 for a l l i
E
2
so that l>a,' ai>ai+l
N.
Since K1 is a normal space we find fl
1 2 fl
K1. Choose a de-
E
E
0, fl(x) = 0 and fliEnK,
C(K1) such that
=
1.
Suppose that we have already constructed fl
E
C(Ki) ( 1 4 ,
...,n-1)
such
that
a) fiaO; filEnKl a
y) filKl-,
ai;
- f,-l
for i=2
,...,n-1. fn-l
According to Tietze's theorem we can choose an extension ?o ,f ry
ru
t o Kn such that fn 2 0 . If fn(x)aan f o r a l l x
ru
E
EnKn then set fn=fn.
ry
Otherwise Kn-l
and EnKnfl{xrKn: fn (x)san) are disjoint closed sub-
Frechet algebras
71
sets o f Kn (recall that an-)>an). Hence we find g
C(Kn). 1 2 g
E
2
0.
such that glKn-l
Set fn =
Tn + fn
2
50
C , x ->
fn(x) if x
Then f is well-defined and f n
E
P
E
C(X) by
Kn.
(**I. since fl
Kn
= fn f o r each
N.
Moreover f ( x ) = 0 and f(y)
2
1/2 for y
E
E. Hence {y
E
X: f(y) < 1/41
i s an open neighbourhood o f x which does not intersect E. i.e. E is closed since x was chosen arbitrarily.
0
(3.1.101 Remarks, i) Note that the hypothesis "completely regular space" was only needed t o prove that X i s hemicompact if C(X) is an F-algebra. In particular we have shown that C(X) is an F-algebra if
X is a hemicompact k-space. ii) Let X be a hemicompact k-space. l e t x
E
X be an arbitrary point,
and l e t U be an open neighbourhood of x. Repeating the l a s t part o f the preceeding proof we find f
P
C(X) so that f k O , f(x)=O and f(y)21/2
for a l l yrX\U. Hence (yoX: f(y)r1/41 is a closed neighbourhood of x which i s contained in U, i.e. X is regular, hence X is a normal space since it is also a Lindelbf space ([KEL] p. 113). ill) For a detailed study of the algebra C(X)
-
X a regular space
-
we r e f e r the reader to Beckenstein et al. [BNS].
(3.2) The soectrum o f a Fr6chet alaebra As for B-algebras we define the spectrum M(A) of an F-algebra A t o be the set o f a l l nonzero complex-valued and continuous algebra
Chapter 3
72
hornomorphlsms endowed wlth the Gelfand topology. Recall that the spectrum of a B-algebra (with identity) is a nonempty compact space. The maln re su l t of thls sectlon shows that In general the spectrum of an F-algebra Is not a compact but a nonempty hemicompact space. As a consequence we get Gelfand-Mazur's theorem, 1.e. we prove that an F-algebra which Is a fleld Is lsomorphlc t o C. This enables us to exhibit a one-to-one correspondence between closed maximal
Ideals and the elements of M(A). Finally we determine the spectrum of A*, the algebra obtained by adjoining an Identity.
(3.2.1)Deflnltion.
Let A be an F-algebra.
I) We denote by S(A) the set of a l l nonzero complex-valued algebra hornomorphlsms and by M(A) the set o f a l l continuous members of S(A). We ca ll M(A) the spectrum o f A.
Ill For f
E
A, we define the functlon
P: S(A) ->
C , cp ->
cp(f),
A
f is called the Gelfand transform o f f. We set
111) We always endow S(A) resp. M(A) wlth the coarsest topology
such that a l l Gelfand transforms are continuous functions on S(A) resp. M(A).This topology is called the Gelfand topology. (3.2.2) Remarks. I ) If cp
E
S(A) (resp. cp
E
M(A)), then sets of the
form { @ E S(A): Ig(fl)-cp(fl)l
A* ->
9:,
A.
MA*).
E
S(A) define
E
$: A* and for cp
S ( A * ) \ { ( P ~ ) set
E
cp': A ->
C . f ->
cp(0.f).
It can be easily checked that
for a l l J,
S(A) (resp. cp
E
X+J,(f),
C , (X.f) ->
->
E
$
E
S(A*)\{cpo)
S(A*)\{cpo))
(cp')= cp), i.e. the map ry
J, ->
S(A*)\{cpo).
J,,
is bijective. Let cp
S(A). and l e t n
E
E
N so that
Icp(f)l s pn(f) for a l l f (1.e. cp
E
E
A,
M(A) by (3.2.2)ii)) then
for a l l (X,f)
E
A*. i.e.
Vice versa i f cp Icp(X,f)l
E
3E
M(A*)\{p,).
S(A*)\{cpo) and
< qn(X.f) for a l l (1.f)
E
then Icp'(f)l = lcp(O,f)i
for all f
E
A. hence
s qJ0.f)
E
S(A))
and that ($1' = J, (resp.
m
I: S(A) ->
(resp. cp'
= pJf)
A*,
76
Chapter 3
Finally choose arbitrary fl
,...,fr
I t follows from this and (3.2.211)
E
A, X1
....'1, c 4: and c~ E S(A).
then
that
I M P O R T A N T REMARK. I n the sequel we only consider F-algebras with identity 1. (3.2.5) Let A,B be F-algebras, and l e t T: A ->
B be a continuous
nontrivial algebra homomorphism, i.e. T(1) = 1. The adjoint spectral
Lemma. Let A,B and T be as above. Then i) T* is continuous; ii) T* is injective if T has dense range; iii) ( S o TI* = T*o S* i f
C is another F-algebra and S: B ->
continuous nontrivial algebra homomorphism;
i v l T* is a homeomorphism if T is bijective.
C is a
77
Spectra of Frechet algebras
*
The l a s t set is open in M(B). hence (T 1-1 (U) is open for every open set U
c
M(A) ( cf. remark (3.2.2)i)).
ii) Let ~ * ( c p ) = T*(+) for
cp,g
M(B),
E
then cpo
T(f) =
T(f) for a l l f
+o
E
A.
hence q(g) = +(g) for a l l g
E
B.
since T(A) is dense in B, thus cp =
+.
iii) This is obvious.
iv)By the open mapping theorem for Frechet spaces T is a homeomorphism. We have (T-l)*o T* = so T* is bijective and
(3.2.6)We shall need lemma (3.2.5) to determine the spectrum of an F-algebra. Let A be an F-algebra with defining sequence of seminorms (pnIn ( r e c a l l that pn
pn+l for a l l n
E
N). For each n
E
N denote by In
the ideal
In = ker pn = {arA: pn(a) = 01, and denote by An the completion of the algebra A/In with respect to the norm p;(a+In)
= pn(a),
so An is a B-algebra by definition. Note that An has an identity
since A has an identity by our general assumption on F-algebras. We set K~
A ->
An. a ->
a+$.,
Then nn is a continuous homomorphism which has dense range. hence
Chapter 3
78
n,
* is continuous and injective by lemma (3.2.5).
This implies
-
since
M(An), as the spectrum of a 9-algebra w i t h identity, is compact that
*
*
nn (M(An))
nn: M(An) ->
c
-
M(A)
is a homeomorphism. Let cp be an arbitrary element of M(A), then there exists n
E
N such
that icp(f)i s pn(f) fo r a l l f
E
A (cf. (3.2.2Jii)).
I f we define
3: A/In then
C, f+In ->
->
3 is a well-defined
continuous homomorphism on A/In and if
we denote the unique extension of
*
Itn ($1
Conversely, if
cp(f),
3
to A,
again by
3 then
= cp. e
M(An), then
inn*(cp)(f)i=
icpo
nn(f)i
p;l(f+In) = pn(f).
(for the inequality cf. (1.2.1)) hence
(*I
= { c p ~ ~ icp(f)i ) : s pn(f) for all f
~;(M(A,)I
E
A)
so
*
nn (M(An))
c
*
nm (M(Am)) for man
and
MA) =
u I~;(M(A,,)). neN
(3.2.7) In the sequel we always identify M(An) with n,*(M(A,,)). (3.2.6) we already know that
...M(An)
c
M(Ant,)
c
By
... i s a countable
compact exhaustion of M(A), 1.e. M(A) is a-compact. I n fact we can improve this result. Recall that a countable compact exhaustion
...K,
c
K,
c...
of a
79
Spectra of Fr6chet algebras
Hausdorff space X is called admissible provided that for each compact set K
c
X there is n
E
N such that K
c
Kn. A space with an ad-
missible exhaustion is called hemicompact. Remark. There are a-compact spaces which are not hemicompact. Take f o r instance Q . the set of a l l rational numbers, endowed with the induced euclidean topology. Q is clearly a-compact and satisfies the f i r s t axiom of countability. Since hemicompact spaces which satisfy the f i r s t axiom of countability are locally compact. cf. (4.4.11, Q cannot be hemicompact. We want to prove that (M(An))n is an admissible exhaustion of M A ) . To show this l e t K cp
E
K the set { f
E
c
M(A) be an arbitrary compact set. For each
A: itp(f)i s 1) is closed, hence
is closed, too. Since
-
by the definition of the Gelfand topology
transform
?
is continuous on M A ) ,
?
- each Gelfand
is bounded on the compact set
K. hence W
A = U nKo. n=l By Bake's theorem (cf. 8.3) there is n KO
E
N such that nKo
- has nonempty interior. So we can choose
such that
hence
From this follows
k
E
-
and thus
N, E>O and g
E KO
80
Chapter 3
We can now summarize our considerations above. (Recall once more that we consider only algebras w i t h identity.) (3.2.8) Theorem ([MICI). Let A be an F-algebra. and l e t An be defined as above. Then (in a natural) sense M(A) = U M(An) ncN and (M(An)In is an admissible exhaustion of M(A), 1.e. M(A) Is a hemicompact space. Corollary. The spectrum of an F-algebra is never empty. Proof. M(A,) is not empty by (1.2.8).
0
(3.2.9) As an immediate consequence we get the theorem of GelfandMazur f o r F-algebras. Theorem. If A is an F-algebra which is a field, then A = C. Proof. The complex multiples of the identity form a subalgebra of A which i s isomorphic t o C. It suffices to show that every f
E
A is a
complex multiple of the identity. Let f
E
A. By the corollary M(A) is not empty. Choose an arbitrary
(Q I
M.(A), then f-cp(fl.1 is not invertible. (Otherwise there exists
g
A such that
E
Spectra of Frechet algebras
81
This i s absurd.) Since A i s a field we have f-cp(fl.1 = 0.
0
(3.2.10) Let A be an F-algebra, whose topology is defined by the Let 1 be a proper closed ideal of A.
sequence of seminorms (p,),.
Then A / I endowed with the quotient topology is a Frgchet space and the topology is defined by the seminorms qn(f+I) = inf{pn(f+g): g
E
1) (cf. [JAR], p. 76).
It is easy to show that multiplication is continuous, i.e. A / I is a
topological algebra. Let f,g p,(f+hl)pn(g+h2)
2
E
A, hl,h2
E
I be arbitrary elements. Then
pn(fg+fh2+ghl+hlh2).
It follows that
qn(f+I)qn(g+I) k qn(fg+I). since fh2+ghl+hlh2
E
1.
i.e. each qn is multiplicative and A / I becomes an F-algebra. Next we want t o determine the spectrum of A/I. Set
V(I) = {cp
E
M(A): cp(f) = 0 for a l l f
E
I).
Since the natural map j: A ->
A/I, f ->
f+I,
is a surjective and continuous homomorphism, the map j*: M(A/I) ->
M(A). cp ->
cpo
j
i s continuous and injective (lemma (3.2.5)). We have
j*(y)(f) = 0 for each f hence j*(M(A/I)) c V(1). For cp
E
V(1) define
E
1 and each y
E
M(A/I)
82
Chapter 3
p: A / I
C, f+l ->
->
3 i s a well-defined
Then
cp(f).
homomorphism. By (3.2.2)ii) there is n
c
N
so that icp(f)i s pn(f) for a l l f
Let h
E
E
A.
1 be an arbitrary element. Then iq(f+I)i = icp(f)i = icp(f+h)i s pn(f+h),
f or each f c A, hence i@f+I)i s qn(f+I) f o r a l l f thus
3 E M(A/I)
E
I,
by (3.2.2)ii). Clearly j*@) = cp, hence
j*(M(A/I)) = V(I). Using (3.2.211) It is easy to show that
j*:M(A/I) ->
V(I)
is in fact a homeomorphism, V(I) endowed with the relatlve Gelfand topology. (3.2.11) An ideal I of A is called maximal If I * A and I is contained In no other proper ideal of A. I is maximal iff A / I Is a field. Hence
- by
the theorem of Gelfand-Mazur
is an F-algebra and I
c
-
A/] is isomorphic t o C. if A
A Is a closed maximal ideal. So we can inter-
pret the natural projection j: A ->
A / I as an element of M(A) with
kernel I. On the other hand ker cp is a maximal closed ideal of A if cp
I
M(A).
This proves the following theorem. Theorem
. The correspondence cp ->
ker
(9.
Is a one-to-one corres-
pondence between the elements o f M A ) and the maximal closed ideals In A. Remark. Every maximal ideal in a B-algebra is closed (1.2.51, hence
Spectra of Frbchet algebras
83
there is a one-to-one correspondence between the maximal ideals of A and the elements of M(A) in this case (1.2.6). Opposite t o this result maximal ideals of F-algebras are in general not closed, as we shall see next. Example. We have M(C(R)) = R by example (3.2.2). 1.e. each maximal closed ideal m
I , = {f for some x
E
E
c
C(R) is of the form
C(R): f ( x ) = 0 )
R by the theorem above. Consider the following idea
I = {f
E
C(R): There exists k
E
N so that f(x) = 0 for xkk
By Zorn's lemma 1 i s contained in a maximal ideal m. Since there exists no x
E
R so that I
c
I,, the same is true for m. i.e.
m is not closed.
(3.2.12) We close this section with a consideration o f
2. the algebra
of the Gelfand transforms. Let A be an F-algebra with a defining sequence of seminorms (p,),. By definition
^A is a subalgebra of
r: A ->
c(M(A)). f ->
C(M(A)) and n
f,
is an algebra homomorphism. We endow C(M(A)) with the compact open topology. Recall from (3.2.8) that (M(An)In is an admissible exhaustion of M A ) . I t follows that the compact open topology is generated by the seminorms
For f
hence
E
A we have
r is continuous.
Chapter 3
84
(3.3) Projective limits I t is an important tool in our theory t o represent each F-algebra as
the projective limit of a sequence o f B-algebras. This representation enables us to carry over many results which are known for B-algebras as we shall see later.
(3.3.1) Let (En1dnln be a sequence o f metric spaces and assume that for each n
E
N a continuous map
Pn: En+, ->
En
is given. We say that this constitutes a projective system of metric spaces
... ->
Tn En+1->
En ->
...
I f P,,(E~+~) is dense in En for a l l n
E
N then we speak o f a dense
projective system. Definition. The subset
n
l -i m En = {(fnIn E En: qn(fn+l) = f, < ncN
for a l l n
E
N)
endowed with the relative product topology is called the projective limit of the projective system.
(3.3.2)Lemma [ARE 11. Let
Qn
En+1 ->
En
-> ...
of complete metric spaces. Then the map "k
:
I i m En ->
has dense range for all k c N.
f k'
85
Projective limits
Proof. It is sufficient t o prove our assertion for k=l. We shall denote the composite o f any m successive mappings in Let el
E
E
&&En
such that
O. We shall construct an
element (cnIn
c
(*I by
E.
of positive numbers such that
(E,)
< d 2 . Since p has dense range we find e2
Bk'
(3.3.4)Theorem. Let
be a dense projective system of B-algebras. Then A = I&Bn
is an
F-algebra. M(A) can be identified in a natural way w i t h UM(Bn) and (M(B,,)),,
is an admissible exhaustion of M(A).
Proof. Use the proof of theorem (3.2.8)and the considerations above. 0
(3.3.5)Example. For k
E
N denote by Ck([O,l])
the algebra o f a l l
functions on [0.1] which are k-times continuously differentiable.
Ck ([0.1])
becomes a B-algebra with respect to the norm Pk+l(f) = 2k SUp{if 0 ) ( X ) i :
X E
[0.1], i=o,
...,k},
where f(') denotes the i-th derivative of f. We have
M(Ck([O,ll)) = [0.11. k more precisely: Each element of M(C ([O.l])) homomorphism at some point x
E
[0,1].
is the point evaluation
cf. [GAM], p. 6.
We claim that Gelfand topology and induced euclidean topology coin-
88
Chapter 3 Set z: [0,1] ->
cide on [O,l].
C, x > x .
Let U be an open subset of [0,1] with respect t o the euclidean topology, and l e t x c U. Then there is E>O such that {y
6
iZ(X)-Z(y)i
ck+l(cogll)
Ck"0,lI)
...
->
constitutes a dense projective system of B-algebras with respect t o the natural restriction mapplngs rk: Ck+1([0.11) ->
c k ([0,13),
Recall the definition o f C"([O,l])
C"CCO,II)
f ->
f.
from (3.1.91. We have
-
= qm C~(CO,II)
and hence M(C'"([O,l]))
= [0,1] by (3.3.4).
The Gelfand and the euclidean topology coincide on [O.l] identify C"([O,l])
with Cm([O,l])".
and we can
the algebra of a l l Gelfand trans-
forms o f C"([O,ll).
-
(3.3.6) We have proved above that l i m B, is an F-algebra if it is the projective limit of a dense projective system. We now show that each F-algebra arises in this way, i.e. if A is an F-algebra then A is the projective limit of a dense projective system of B-algebras. Let A be an F-algebra with defining sequence of seminorms (pnlnv
89
Projective limits cf. (3.1.7). As in (3.2.6)we denote by A,
the completion of the algebra
A/ker p, with respect to the norm p;l(f
+
= pn(f)
ker p,)
and by r r , the canonical mapping
A ->
A.,
f ->
f+ker p,.
For m m we define
x
m.n
: Am ->
A,
t o be theextension of the mapping A/ker pm ->
f + ker pm ->
A/ker p,
f + ker p.,
rr, (resp. xm,,,) are (we1I-defined) continuous algebra homomorphisms which have dense range, and
(*I
p ; ( ~ ~ , ~ ( f )s) p h ( f ) for a i l f
E
Am,
since p, s pm. Note that
x m,n
- "n+l.n
O
"n+2,n+1
O
.*.
O
"m,m-1.
We consider the dense projective system of B-algebras
... ->
An+1
"n+l.n > A, ->
...
Let T:A ->
i-i m An, f ->
A
(A,
lldlM(A))
A
A. f ->
n
f , is a topological homomorphism, i.e.
is a uB-algebra (cf. (1.2.10)).
Since M(A) is a compact nonempty space (cf. (1.2.8)) and rates the points of M(A) we see that each &-algebra
^A
sepa-
is topologi-
cally and algebraically isomorphic t o a closed pointseparating subalgebra of C(K), K a compact nonempty Hausdorff space. Vice versa each closed pointseparating subalgebra A of C(K) is a uB-algebra, since clearly Ilf 211, = IIfll,2 for each f c A. (4.1.2) Definition. Let A be an F-algebra. Then A is called uniform
Chapter 4
92
Fr6chet algebra (uF-algebra) if there is a defining sequence of seminorms (pnIn such that 2 2 pn(f 1 = pn(f) for a l l f
A, n
E
E
N.
(4.1.3) Theorem .a) The following statements are equivalent for an algebra A: i) A is a uF-algebra; ii) A is the projective l i m i t of a dense projective system of uB-alge-
bras; iii) A contains the constants and is topologically and algebraically
isomorphic t o a pointseparating and complete subalgebra of C(X), where X is a hemicompact space and C(X) Is endowed with the compact open topology
.
b) If A is a uF-algebra, then
I': A->
h
A. f->
P,
defines a topological and a1gebraical isomorphism. Proof. I)
4
111) By theorem (3.2.8) M(A) is a hemicompact space. We
shall show that h
A
I':A->A.f->f
is a topological and algebraical homomorphism. Let (pnIn be a defining sequence o f seminorms f o r A so that pn(f 2 1 = pn(f) 2 for a l l f
A, n
E
E
N.
Recall from (3.2.6) the definition of An, rrn and p;l. Note that pk(g2 1 = pk(g) 2 for a l l g
E
An,
hence each An is a uB-algebra and
118'1M A "1 = pA(g) f o r So we have f o r every f
E
A. n
all g E
N
E
An (cf. (1.2.10)).
Uniform Fr6chet algebras
93
Here we have identified M(An) and R,,*(M(A~)) (cf. (3.2.7)) and denote by (nn(f)In the Gelfand transform of nn(f). A
Since the topology o f A is generated by the seminorms (cf. (3.2.12)) Clearly
I'
ll-llM(An)
is a topological algebra homomorphism.
3 separates the
points o f M(A) and contains the constants,
since we consider only algebras with identity. iii) 4 ii) Let (K,),
be an admissible exhaustion of X. By our hypo-
thesis A is an F-algebra with defining sequence of seminorms
T: A ->
(.rrn(f)),
defines a topological homomorphism. Since
each A,
is a uB-algebra.
ii)4 t) Let
... ->
->'h B, ->
,B ,,
...
be a dense projective sytem of uB-algebras. By (3.3.3)J&Bn
is an
F-algebra with defining sequence of seminorms p;((fn),,)
= maxi llfjlll, ]sk 1. k
P
N.
Since
i IIf1I2. i for
llf211 = we have
*
pk(((f,),)
2
all f
E
B (cf. 4.1.1)
i
* 2 1 = pk((fn)n) for a l l k
E
N, (fnIn P
Y such that the map
Chapter 4
100
induces a topological a gebra isomorphism between B and A. ii) A morphic extension (B,Y) of (A.X) is called morphic h u l l of (A,X)
if for any other morphi extension (C,Z) of (A.X) there i s a unique continuous function h: Z ->
Y so that the diagram
is commutative , i.e. (B,Y) is a morphic extension of (C,Z) via the map h and hog = f. Remarks. i) If (B.Y) is a morphic extension of (A,X) then f is necessarily injective, since A separates the points of X. So we can interpret the elements of B as extended functions of A . Part ill guarantees that Y is the largest space t o which a l l elements of A can be extended. ii) If (B,Y) is a morphic extension of (A,X) via f: X ->
is a morphic extension of (B.Y) via g: Y ->
T (c) = TfoTg(c) for a l l c 9.f ill) The structure map j: X ->
3 ->
Z. then (C,Z) is a morphic
Z, since
extension via go f : X ->
TI:
Y and (C.Z)
n
A, f ->
E
C.
M ( A ) is continuous and n
f
o j
=f
is just the inverse of the mapping
r
(cf. 3.2.12) and hence a topo-
logical algebra isomorphism by (4.1.31). so ( 2 , M ( A ) ) is a morphic extension of (A.X). Before we show that ($,M(A))
is the morphic h u l l of (A,X) we prove
two lemmata. Recall from (3.2.5)iv)
that
Extension o f uf-algebras
101
is a homeomorphism, i f B i s a morphic extension of A via f.
(4.2.3) Lemma. I f (B.Y) is a morphic extension of (A.X) via the continuous map f. then the diagram f
X
> Y
is commutative, where ,j
: Proof. Since T e:T
(resp. j,)
denote the structure maps.
is a homeomorphism it suffices to show that
j, =
f.
Let z c X. and l e t b
E
B be arbitrary elements, then A
= b(CpZmTf) = Cp,(Tf(b))
hTf*"j,(z))
= cp,(bof)
=
= bof(z) = 6 ( j y o f ( z ) ) . Our assertion follows. since (4.2.4)Lemma.
separates the points of M(B)
Let A,B be two uF-algebras, and l e t T:B ->
A be a
h
topological algebra isomorphism, then ( B .M(B)) is a morphic extension of (j\.M(A)) via the adjoint spectral map T*. Proof. The map A
S:
B ->
A
h
A, b ->
I;oT*,
i s a we1 I-defined injective algebra homomorphism. It is continuous, since T* is a homeomorphism. Let b
E
B such that T(b) = a. then
^a
A
E
A be an arbitrary element. Let
102
Chapter 4
hence s is a topological isomorphism by the open mapping theorem. 0
(4.2.5)Theorem. (s,M(A)) is the morphic hull of (A,X). Proof. We have already remarked that (hA,M(A)) i s a morphic extension of (A.X). Let (8.Y) be another morphic extension with respect to the map f:X->
Y.
Define
h: Y ->
*
(Tf 1-1 o
M ( A ) , y ->
then the diagram
) ~ .
is commutative by (4.2.3) and (s,M(A)) is a morphlc extension of (B,Y) via h by lemma (4.2.4) and remark (4.2.2)ii)-lii),
since
( T i ) - ' = (Tf -1 1*
by the proof of lemma (3.2.5)iv). Let h,, h2
:
Y ->
M(A) be two maps such that the diagram
is commutative for 14.2. Then A
A
Tf(?ohl) = aohiof = aajx = a for a l l a
E
A, 14.2.
Extension of uF-algebras
103
hence n
aohl = Tf-'(a)
for a l l a
E
A, b1.2,
h
and we have hl = h2 since A separates the points of M A ) .
0
(4.3) Convexity for uF-alaebras Recall from (2.2.6) that a domain G
c
Cn (or more general a re-
duced complex space X I is said to be holomorphically convex if the holomorphically convex h u l l of each compact subset K
G is again
c
a compact subset of G. As noted in (2.2.7) G is holomorphically convex iff M(Hol(G)) = G. In this section we introduce convexity f or uF-algebras in an analo-
gous way. (4.3.1) Definition. Let (A.X) be a uF-algebra, and l e t K
X be a com-
c
pact set. We c a l l the set
R,,,
= {x s X: I f ( x ) l
g
IIftt,.
f or a l l f
E
A)
the A-convex h u l l of K in X. We say that a subset S
if
R(,,,
c
S for each compact set K
we use the abbreviation
c
S. I f K
c
c
X is A-convex
M(A) is compact
RA = R(2,M(A)).
(4.3.2) Example. If K c X is compact then in general
R(,,,)
is not
compact. For example l e t C* = C\{Ol and set A = Hol(C)lc,.
It is
easy to show that A is a complete subalgebra o f C(C*). hence (A.C*) is a uF-algebra by (4.1.3). Set dD = {x
h(AmCO) = { x c*: 1x1 E
since each f
E
E
C*: 1x1 = 1). Then
1).
(A,C*) is the restriction of an element
r"
E
Hol(C).
Definition. Let (A.X) be a uf-algebra. We say that X is A-morphically h
convex if Kc,,,
is compact for every compact set K
c
X.
Chapter 4
104
G
Remark. As noted above a domain
iff M(Hol(G)) =
c
Cn is holomorphically convex
G. Of course this result
is not valid in our general
setting. Take fo r example (P(dD),dD), then dD is P(dD)-morphical l y convex, but M(P(dD)) = (x
6
C : 1x1
1) (cf. (1.2.4)ii)).
S
A
However we can prove that M(A) is A-morphically convex.
(4.3.3) Theorem. Let A be a uF-algebra, and l e t K pact set. Then M(2,)
c
RA and R, convex .
can be identified with A
set. In particular M(A) is A-morphically Proof. Since A is a uF-algebra
h
r: A ->
M A ) be a com-
A, f ->
is a compact
A
f , i s a topological
algebra isomorphism, cf. (4.1.3). hence we can naturally identify
M(A) and M(%. Since the restriction mapping
has dense range the adjoint spectral map
r*:
A
~ ( 2 , )->
MA) = MA)
is continuous and injective (cf. (3.2.5)ii)). M(S), of a uB-algebra
- is compact,
r*: M(hA,)
->
-
as the spectrum
hence
r*(M@,))
i s a homeomorphism. Our assertions w i l l follow if we can show that
r*(M(%,)) = Let cp
E
R,.
M(2,) and
? E ^A
be arbitrary elements, then
iP(r*(cp))t = tcp(r(f))l
PI .,I
for the inequality cf. (3.2.2)ii). On the other hand, if cp e R A then
7: 21K->
C,?I, ->
is a well-defined mapping, since
A
f(cp1,
?I, a 0 implies that
hence in particular ?(cp) = 0. Clearly
3
t
0 and
A
is an algebra homomorphism.
105
Convexity f o r uF-al gebras It is continuous since
i?(PIK)i Hence
= iP(tp)i s
IIPIIR = IPI,
for a l l f
6
A.
A
A
3 can
be extended t o an element of M(AK) and
r*(g) = 9.
(4.3.4) Remarks. i) It follows from the theorem that we can always choose an admissible exhaustion (Knln of M(A). which is moreover A
(PnlAf o r
A-convex, i.e. Kn =
all n
ii) If (A,X) is a uF-algebra and K
easy t o show that A, A
,, to ,,A
( j:
X ->
c
c
N.
X is a compact subset, then it i s
is topologically and algebraically isomorphic
M(A) the structure map, c f . (4.2.1)). Hence we
can identify M(A,) ill) Let L
E
with j(K)",.
the 2-convex h u l l of j(K).
X be a hemicompact set, and l e t (Knln be an admissible from (4.1 5 ) .Then
exhaustion of L. Recall the definition of A, A
= U j(KnIA,
M(A,) and (j(Kn):ln
is an admissible exhaustion of M(A,)
by theorem
(4.1.6) and ill. In particular i f L c M(A) is a hemicompact and 2-convex set we can identify M&,)
and L as sets. A
Let L c M(A) be a hemicompact and A-convex subset, and l e t K
c
L
be a compact subset. Identify L and M(3,) as sets. We claim that on A
K the relative topology (inherited from M(A,))
and the original topo-
logy (inherited from M(A)) coincide. A
We interpret the elements of A,
as complex-valued functions on L
which can be approximated uniformly on each compact set o f L by A
elements of A. cf. (4.1.5). Since
PI,
A
E
A,
for each
? E
2, we
see that
the original topology on K is coarser. To prove that both topologies coincide we have only to show by (3.2.2111 that sets o f the form
106
Chapter 4 U
fls
?l,...,?r
- ...fr
A
c A c,p
E
.P
= (9
E
,...,r~
K: i?+cp)-?pi < I, i=1
K, are a neighbourhood of cp with respect to the
To see this choose
original topology.
II?i-tiIIK
ii) Let K be a compact neighbourhood of
E
109 M(A)\U f 1..
llGllK f or (9.
...fr -
g = fl-P1(tp).
Choose fl.
....fr
E
A by
(3.2.211) so that
Then U
n
is A-convex and relatively compact. It i s moreover
.....f,.9
f1
hemicompact, since n '
= {J, MA):
i$(~,)-?~(tp)i
1-(1/n)), n
E
N,
is an admissible exhaustion. Example. The closure of an A-convex set need not be A-convex.
For instance consider the uF-algebra (Hol(C).C) and define
G = {z
E
C : i z +l i < 2 and i z l > 1).
Then G is a simply connected domain, hence G is polynomially convex ([NAR 13, p. 151). hence Hol(C)-convex. but
-
by the remark above
-G
is also
a - the closure of G - is not polynomially con-
vex, since it contains {z
E
C : iz+11 = 2).
(4.4) Uniform Fr6chet algebras with locally compact spectrum
Many of our l a te r results w i l l be valid only f or uF-algebras with local ly compact spectrum. Although the hypothesis "locally compact spectrum" is quite elementary, it would be important t o find criterions for A which imply this hypothesis. No such crlterions seem t o be known, besides very special situations, cf. for instance (18.2.8). I n [H/V 11 Hayes and Vigue constructed even a reduced complex space X with countable topology such that M(Hol(X)) is not locally compact at any point.
110
Chapter 4
(4.4.11 We f i r s t state a sufficient topological condition. Proposition. If a hemicompact space X satisfies the f i r s t axiom of countability then X is locally compact. Proof. Let (Knln be an admissible exhaustion of X. Assume there is a point x c X without compact neighbourhood. Let (UnIn be a countable basis for the neighbourhood system of x. Choose f o r every n
E
N a point xn
e Un\Kn. then
K = {xn: n
e
NI U {XI
is compact. but there is no n
E
N such that K
c
Kn. This is a contra
diction.
0
With regard to the problem described above it would be enough t o find criterions fo r A which imply the axiom of f i r s t countability f or the spectrum M(A). Unfortunately in the next theorem we have to assume a priori that M(A) is locally compact. (4.4.2) Theorem [KRA
11. Let
spectrum M(A), and l e t cp
E
A be a uF-algebra with locally compact
M A ) . Suppose there is a sequence
(fnIn in A so that the ideal (fl.f 2....) lies dense in the maximal ideal ker cp = { f e A: cp(f) = 0 ) . then there exists a countable basis f or the neighbourhood system o f cp.
For the proof we use a proposition. Proposition. Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Suppose that x c X is a Gg-point, i.e. there exists a sequence of open neighbourhoods (Un),,
such that {XI = n Un. nEN
Then x has a countable neighbourhoodbasis.
111
uF-algebras with locally compact spectra Proof. Let K be a compact neighbourhood of x. Set L1 = (int KInU,. Choose a compact neighbourhood Q, of x such that Q,
c
L1, and set
L2 = (int Ql)nU2. Continuing in this manner we get a sequence (LnIn of open neighbourhoods such that
... where
3
Ln
3
Ln+1 3 L,+,
i n denotes the
3
Ln+2 D
...
closure of Ln. By our assumption we have
n ?In= {XI.
(*I
nEN
Now l e t W be an arbitrary open neighbourhood of x. Let y an arbitrary point. By
(*I there is n
compactness of K\W there is m Lm
c
N such that y
E
K\W be
X\cn.By the
N so that L,n(K\W)=0.
i.e.
W, and we are done.
Proof o f (4.4.2). For n
Then
E
E
E
E
0
N set
nun = ( 9 ) .
0
(4.4.3) We say that a uF-algebra is topologically countably generated if there is a sequence (fnIn in A such that C[fl.f 2,...], the ring of polynomials in fl.f 2.... lies dense in A. Note that in this case A is separable. Corollary. Let A be a separable uf-algebra with locally compact spectrum M A ) . Then M(A) satisfies the f i r s t axiom of countabillty. Proof. Let (gnIn be a countable dense subset o f A, and l e t cp
E
M(A)
112
Chapter 4
be an arbitrary point, then the ideal (gl-01(p),g2-02(p),...)
lies
dense in ker 9. Remarks.1) Both results
0
- even for
finitely generated uF-algebras
-
are In general not valid If we drop the assumption "locally compact spectrum". Otherwise the spectrum of every finitely generated uFalgebra would be automatically locally compact by (4.4.1). This is false as we shall see in (5.1.12). ill On the other hand l e t K be a compact Hausdorff space which does
not satisfy the f i r s t axlom o f countabllity. Then (C(K1.K) is an example of a uB-algebra with (locally) compact spectrum, which does not satisfy the f i r s t axlom of countablllty. Ill) I n (5.1.12) we shall give a simple example of a uF-algebra (A,X)
on a locally compact space X such that M(A) Is not locally compact (see also the example of Hayes and Vigue, mentioned above).
113
CHAPTER 5 FINITELY GENERATED F-ALGEBRAS
In this chapter we deal with a class of F-algebras which admit a finite set of topological generators. In this case the problem of determining the spectrum is equivalent t o the problem o f determining the polynomially convex h u l l of compact subsets o f C". (5.1 .l)Definition. We c a l l an F-algebra A (topologically) n-generared provided there exist elements fl.....fn
in A such that A is the
closure of the polynomials in fl.....fn. (5.1.2) Examples. i) Let G
c
Cm be a polynomially convex open set,
i.e. there exists an admissible exhaustion (KnIn of G consisting of polynomially convex compact subsets. Let f
E
Hol(G). then f can be
approximated uniformly on each Kn by polynomials (cf. (1.4.5)). So
Hol (GI is n-generated by the coordinate functions zl,
...,zn.
ill Using the theorem of Stone-Weierstra6 we see that C(R) is singly generated by the function z : R -> iii) Let f
E
C"([O.l])
C , x ->
x.
be an arbitrary element, and l e t n e
N. By
the
theorem of Stone-WeierstraB we can choose a sequence of polynomials (Pk)k such that
11 f(")-Pkll[O,
11 ->
0, as k ->
Q),
where f(") denotes the n-th derivative o f f. Consider on [ O , l ] the polynomials
Chapter 5
114
Then
J f (n) (t)-Pk(t) dt
=
if("')(x)-p"k(x)i
1
0
~ ~ f ( n ) - p k ~ ~ [ O->, l ] 0, as k ->
m.
Continuing in this manner we get a sequence of polynomlals (qk)k so that
'If
(1)-
(1) qk "[0,1]
->
I t follows that CQ)([O,l])
z:R->
0, as k ->
Q),f or i=O,
...,n.
is singly generated by the function
x.
C. x->
For more information about the algebra CaD(M),M a differentiable manifold, we r e fe r the reader t o the book of Mallios [MALI. (5.1.3) Remarks. i) Generating elements are not uniquely determined.
For example every real-valued function f
c
C(R). which separates
the points of R, generates C(R) by the theorem of Stone-Weierstra6. ii) We do not assume that the number n i s minimally chosen, so if A
i s m-generated, then A i s also n-generated for nam. Next we want t o reformulate our main theorems for finitely-generated uF-algebras. First we consider the joint spectrum of the generating elements. (5.1.4) Let A be an n-generated F-algebra with generating elements
fl,...,fn.
We denote by
f
I?: M A ) ->
Cn.
Clearly Pis continuous. n
p(flD".Dfn)(p)
the mapping
,...,fn(cp)). If F ( I ~= )P~JI), then
= ^p
~p->
(flp.*.Dfn)($)
(?l(~)
n
Finitely generated F-algebras for a l l polynomials p, where ^p(f,....,f,)
115
denotes the Gelfand trans-
A
form o f p(f ls...,fn). Hence @(cp) = g(Q) f or a l l g cp =
Q, i.e.
f
E
A. and we have
i s injective.
(5.1.5) Proposition. Let A be a uF-algebra with generating elements
fl,...,fn,
A
and l e t K c M(A) be an A-convex compact set. Then P ( K ) h
is a polynomially convex compact set and A,
is topologically and
algebraically isomorphic t o P@(K)). h
Proof. By our assumptions A,
is n-generated by
fll ,,...,f A
A
nlK Since M(hA,)= K by (4.3.31, the r e s u l t follows from (1.2.13).
.
(5.1.6) Let (Knln be a sequence o f compact sets in Cm such that Kn Kn+l for a l l n uB-algebras
... ->
E
N. Consider the dense projective system o f
P(Kn+,)->‘n
P(Kn)
-*
...
with the restriction mappings ‘n
:
P(Kn+l) ->
P(Kn). f ->
f lK n.
-
Then A = l i m P(Kn) is a uF-algebra by (4.1.3), the spectrum of A can be identified as a set with U Qn , where nomiaiiy convex hull o f Kn. and
pn denotes the poiy-
(RnIn is an admissible exhaustion
with respect t o the Gelfand topology (cf. theorem (4.1.6) and (1.2.4)ii)). Clearly A is m-generated by the coordinate functions zl.
....zm.
(5.1.7) Remarks. i) Let A be as above. Then we can interpret each
2 as a complex-valued function on U Rn. which can be approximated uniformly on each Rn by polynomials. ii) On every pn the induced Gelfand topology and the induced eu-
element?
E
clidean topology are equivalent ( cf. (1.2.4)ii)).
Chapter 5
116
Rn is finer
In genera the Gelfand topology on U
than the induced
euclidean topology, since the coordinate functions z1,....zm elements
A by i) and for each x z U
3f
Rn , E>O the
define
set
u Un: Izl(x)-zi(y)i < E, i=1,...,m~ = {y o u Un: Ixi-yil < E, i=1,...,m~ {y
E
is Gelfand open (cf. (3.2.2)i)). Both topologies are equivalent iff each element with respect to the euclidean topology on U
A
f
E
A is continuous
Rn.
Suppose that &,,In is an admissible exhaustion of U spect to the euclidean topology. Let and l e t (xnIn be a sequence In U
Rn
f 3
2,
with re-
be an arbitrary element,
L
h
which converges t o xo z U Kn
.(euclidean topology). Then K = { x n : nkO) is a compact set (euclidean topology), hence there exists I
E:
N such that K
both topologies coincide, we see that tf(xn)), and it follows that
f
it,. Since on R, A
converges to f (xo)
Is continuous with respect to the euclidean is an admissible
topology. Hence both topologies coincide iff exhaustion of U
c
Rn with respect to the euclidean topology.
We give a simple example, where both topologies do not coincide.
For n
o
N set Kn = {exp(it): 2 n - ( l / n )
2
t
0).
Then each Kn i s polynomially convex, since C\Kn is connected (cf. (1.2.4)ii)) and U Kn = {z
E
C : l z l = 1) = dD. Clearly dD is a compact
set (euclidean topology) but there is no I Example. Let
G
c
E
N so that aD
c
KI.
Cn be a polynomially convex domain, and l e t (Knln
be an admissible polynomially convex exhaustion of G. Then
T: Hol(G) ->
&&P(Kn),
f ->
(flK,In.
defines a topological and algebraical isomorphism by (1.4.5). Hence
Finitely generated F-algebras
117
M(Hol(G)) = U Kn = G as sets. Since (KJn is an admissible exhaustion of G with respect to the euclidean topology we see that M(Hol(G)) = G as topological spaces by (5.1.7)ii). (We could have also derived this res ul t from (2.2.7). since G is holomorphical l y convex.)
.
(5.1.8) Structure theorem fo r finitely generated uF-algebras Let
... ->
An+, ->
...
An ->
be a dense projective system of &-algebras. A = ) L A n is n-generated by fl1...'f,.
Suppose that
Then
i) A is topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o
f?(M(A)) is a
homeomorphism then M(A) i s metrizable. (5.1.10)
Recall that fo r finitely generated uB-algebras B the map
f?
is always a homeomorphism and f(M(B)) is polynomially convex (cf. (1.2.13)). The next examples
-
due to Brooks [BRO 31
- show that
these results are not valid fo r F-algebras. Example. We construct a finitely generated uF-algebra A. such that fo r no generating elements fl.....fr
the map f is a homeomorphism.
Let ($,I,be , a decreasing sequence of positive numbers such that t1 < a / 2 and I i m t,
the plane and set n
= 0. Let Ln denote the segment [O,exp(itn)] in
Finitely generated F-algebras
119
Each Kn is polynomially convex (cf. (1.2.4)ii)). By (5.1.6) the spectrum o f the singly generated uf-algebra A = I&P(Kn)
can be iden-
tified with U K n and (KnIn is an admissible exhaustion with respect to the Geifand topology on U Kn. We shall show that M(A) Is not metrizable. which yields our r e s u l t by proposition (5.1.9). Suppose there is a metric d on U Kn which defines the Gelfand topology. Since Gelfand topology and euclidean topology coincide on each Kn by (5.1.7)ii). we can choose for every n xn c Ln\{O)
6
N an element
< 2-".
c Kn so that d(xn,O)
Hence K = ( 0 ) U {xn: n
E
N) is a compact set with respect t o the
topology defined by d on U Kn. but K is not contained in any Kn, therefore K cannot be Gelfand compact. This is a contradiction. (5.1.11) Example. We construct a singly generated uF-algebra such that h l ( A ) ) is not polynomial l y convex. Recall that a set M
c
Cn i s called polynomially convex provided that
the polynomially convex hul I
R of
each compact set K
c
M is con-
tained in M. Let K,
= [0,2rc-(l/n)],
then Kn is poiynomiaiiy convex (cf. (1.2.4)ii)).
and l e t A = < l -i m P(Kn). Then M(A) = C0.2.r~)and Gelfand topology and euclidean topology are equivalent on [0,2rt) by (5.1.7)il). We have P(Kn) = C(Kn) by the theorem of Stone-WeierstraB. thus
A = C([Ov2.rr)). Equally the function g: [0,2r)->
C , t ->
exp(it1
generates A. But 6([0,2%)) = {z c C : Izi=l) is not polynomially convex. Moreover
8
i s not a homeomorphism, while
5?
is a homeomor-
phism f o r the generating element
?: [0,2rr) -' c, t ->
t.
So we have seen that there are singly generated uF-algebras such
Chapter 5
120 that
?
is a homeomorphism fo r one generating element. while
?
fails
t o be a homeomorphism fo r another generating element. (5.1.12) Example. We construct a doubly generated uF-algebra (A,X) on a locally compact space X such that M ( A ) is not locally compact (cf. remark (4.4.3)iii)).
For n
E
N define the following subsets of C2
Kn = ((z.0): 1zlr:l) U ((0.w): w
E
C0.231 U { ( Z ~ W )iz : l = l, l wlr: l-(l/ n)~
Then Kn may be illustrated in the following way
i) Let
Ln = {(z,w): Izlr:l, iwir:1-(1/n)) U ((0.w): w
E
C0.23)
Claim. Ln is the polynomlally convex hul l of Kn.
We f i r s t show that Ln is polynomially convex. Let (x,y) be an arbitrary point of C 2 \Ln. I f I x i > l , then Izl(x.y)l
> ~~zl~~Ln. where z1 denotes the f i r s t coordinate
function.
I f Ol-(l/n), hence Ip(x*y)l >
IIPllLn
.
for the polynomial p(zlsz2) = ~ ~ ( z ~ / ( l - ( l / n ) )k) sufficiently ~ large.
If x=O, then y
E
C\M with M =
{WE
C : Iwl r: l -(l/ n)1 U CO.21.
Since M is a polynomially convex compact subset of the plane (cf. (1.2.4)ii)). we find a polynomial p so that Ip(y)l > llpllM
Finitely generated F-algebras
121
and so IpX,yN >
llplLn
for the polynomial ~ ( z 1 , z 2 ) = p(z2), hence Ln is polynomially convex and the polynomially convex hull
f?,
of Kn is contained in Ln.
Now l e t p be an arbitrary polynomial, and l e t (x,y)
E
Ln\Kn. Then
applying the maximum principle t o the polynomial q(z) = p(z,y)
-
-
we get ip(x,y)l = I q o d l s l l q l l { i z p l }
so Ln
c
- llpll{(z~y) I z l = l }
llPllK".
:
2,.
ii) Set X = U Kn. Then X, endowed with the induced euclidean topo-
logy, is a locally compact space and (Knln is an admissible exhaustion of X. Set
A = {f
t
C(X): f can be approximated uniformly on each
K,
by polynomials}. Then (A.X) is a uF-algebra by theorem (4.1.3)iii) and (A.X) is doubly generated by the coordinate functions. We have A = l L P ( K n ) by theorem (4.1.6) and h
M(A) = U Kn = U Ln as sets and (LnIn i s an admissible exhaustion of M A ) with respect t o the Gelfand topology by (5.1.6). ill) Assertion. The point (0.1)
E
M A ) has no compact neighbourhood
(Gelfand topology). We assume the contrary. Then there is n
E
N so that Ln is a compact
neighbourhood of (0,l). By (3.2.211) there exist fl.....fr
(*I
{(y1,y2) A
A
E
The functions fl....,fr
A
M A ) : Ifl(y1,y2)-fl(0,1)i A
< 1, i=l,...,r}
E
A such that
c
Ln.
are continuous on every Ln (euclidean topo-
logy) by (5.1.7)i). So we can choose m c N and w l - ( l / m ) > w > l - ( l / n ) and Iq(0,w) -?,(O,l)l
< 1/4 for i=l
,...,r.
E
R such that
122
Chapter 5
Agaln because of the contlnulty of the ?,Is we can choose u = (ul,u2)
c
Lm\Ln such that
< 1/4 for l=l,...,r,
I?l(0,w)-?l(ul,u2)i hence
i?i~~.1~-?l~ul,u2~~ < 1 for 1=1, ...*r. But thls 1s a contradlctlon t o (*I.
(5.2) Ratlonal l y finitely generated F-algebras (5.2.1)Deflnltlon.
We say that an F-algebra A Is rationally n-gener-
ated provided there exist elements fl....*fn
in A such that a l l func-
tlons of the form p.q-l* p and q polynomlals in fl,...,fn,
q lnvertlble
in A, lie dense In A. (5.2.2)Example. Let G
c
C be a domain, and l e t (Knln be an ad-
mlsslble exhaustlon of G such that for a l l n
c
N there Is no bounded
component of C\Kn, which is relatlvely compact In G. Fix n
c
N. Let V1,V 2,... be the bounded components of C\Kn. For
each k we choose a point Xk
E
Vk\G. Then R(Kn) Is doubly generated
by the functions Z:Kn
->
c, X
X,
and f:Kn ->
c, X ->
k
Ek/o(-Xk)
where 8k are sultable chosen constants (cf. the proof of (24.4) In CSTOI). R(Kn) 1s slngly generated by z if there Is no bounded compo-
Rational l y finitely generated F-al gebras nent. Let g
E
123
Hol(G) be an arbitrary element. Then g1
Kn
E
R(Kn) by
(1.4.5). Hence g can be approximated uniformly on Kn by polynomials in f and z. Since a l l xk
E
C\G, the partial sums of f are of the form
p/q. p.q polynomials, q invertible in Hol(G). I t foiiows from this that
Hol(G) is singly rationally generated by Z:
G ->
C , x ->
X.
(5.2.3) We note that n-generated F-algebras are in particular rational l y n-generated. I n the same way as for n-generated F-algebras we can show that the map A
F : M(A) ->
Cn. cp ->
(?l(p)s...,?n(cp))
is injective and continuous. if A i s rationally n-generated by fl,...,fn.
(5.2.4) Recall that a compact set K
c
Cn is called rationally con-
vex, if K = M(R(K)). Proposition. i) Let A be a rationally n-generated uF-algebra w i t h generating elements f,
.....fn
E
A and l e t K
A
c
M(A) be an A-convex comA
pact subset, then P ( K ) is rational i y convex and A, is topologically and algebraically isomorphic to R(P(K)), where
f
is defined as in
(5.2.3). ii) If (Knln is an admissible $-convex exhaustion of M(A). then A is topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Proof.
PI,:
K ->
I_imR(f(Kn))
P(K)
is a homeomorphism by (5.2.3) and it is easy t o show that -1 A T:A,-> f->
R(P(K)),
is a we1 i-defined algebra homomorphism. Since
l l T ( g ) I l ~ ~=, ~11g11,
for a l l g
n E
A .,
.
Chapter 5
124 h
A, is isomorphic to a closed subalgebra of R(P(K)). Let g
E
R(P(K))
be an arbitrary element. Using (1.4.21 we can show that there is h c $K such that h = g a p (note that M(R(K)) = K by (4.3.3)). i.e. T(h) = g and T is surjective, hence
2Kis isomorphic to R(P(K)).
The adjoint spectral map
(T-$*: MQ
->
M(R(P(K)))
is a homeomorphism by (3.2.511~). Let cp c K = M(2,)
and f
E
R(P(K))
be arbitrary elements, then (T-’)*(p)(f)
= cp(T-’(f)) = p(feP) = f(P(cp1).
so
(T-ll*(cpI = p(p), and (T-~)*(K) =
RK).
hence
P(K)= M(R(P(K))). ill For a l l n
E
N the diagram
commutes, where rn resp. rk denote the natural restriction mappings and Tn+l
resp. Tn denote the isomorphisms of 1).
Hence
... ->
R(P(K,+~ r
R(P(K,N ->
...
constitutes a dense projective system of uB-algebras and A is topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o LimR(e(Kn))
.
0
In the.case of ii) of the theorem we can identify M(&imR(P(K,))) with U p(Kn)= f ( M ( A ) ) and @(KnN,,
is an admissible exhaustion of
Rationally finitely generated F-al gebras
125
U P(Kn) with respect t o the Gelfand topology (cf. (4.1.6)). (5.2.5) We close this chapter considering the projective system
(*I where
... ->
R(Kn++
... c Kn
c
Kn+,
c
rn
> R(Kn) ->
...
,
... is a sequence of compact
subsets of Cm
and rn denotes the restriction mapping. We f i r s t remark that in general
(*I is not a dense projective system,
hence we can not apply our previous results in this case. We give an example.
For x a C, r,O set Dx,r = tz a C: I z - x i < r) and
b = {Izlsl).
For
n c N set
Then the restriction mappings r
I .n
:
R(KI)
-*
R(Kn). I > n,
don't have dense range, since for example l / ( z - ( l / n ) ) cannot be approximated uniformly on Kn by elements of R(KI). Each element f c&&R(Kn)
can be interpreted as complex-valued
function on U Kn such that fl of llm_R(K,)
Kn
c
R(Kn) for a l l n
E
N.The topology
is generated by the seminormsystem 11.11
to see that )&R(Kn)
Kn
and it i s easy
is in fact a uF-algebra.
(5.2.6) Even if (*)in (5.2.5) constitutes a dense projective system it is in general not true that & L R ( K n ) i s rationally m-generated.
while
9,
deflnes a continuous and Injective algebra homomorphlsm. We claim that T is surjective, too. Let h
E
A be an arbltrary element. Choose polynomials qn, pn so that
iItn(f)/Gn(f)-tiiKn < l/n ,
(*I
where ^pn(f) denotes the Gelfand transform of pn(f). Since $,(f) Invertible in 3, ^q,(f) has no zero on D, hence tn(f)/$,(f) for a l l n
E
N. Set D' = {z: lzl
E
Is
Hol(D)
1/21. It follows by (*I and the max-
imum principle that
is a Cauchy sequence wlth respect to the norm
.
11-1ID. hence this
sequence converges on {iz1 Cn.
cp ->
n
(fl(q)
E
A. We de-
n
....,fn(cp)).
The set P(M(A)) is c a l l e d the joint spectrum of fl.....fn. (6.1.2)Theoret-n [ZAM]. Let A be an F-algebra. and l e t f ,,...,f, Let U c Cn be an open set which contains the joint spectrum of
fl.
...,fn. Then there i s a unique continuous homomorphism 8,: Hol(U) ->
A
such that i) 8F(zi) = fi, i = l . ...,n. and
ii) 8,(gIn
h
= goF f o r a l l g
E
Hol(U).
E
A.
130 where z1
Chapter 6
,...,zn
denote the coordinate functions and 8,(gIA
denotes
the Gelfand transform of 8,(g). Proof. Represent A as the projective limit of a dense projective system of B-algebras
... -'
Ak+l ->
...
Ak ->
Ak, resp. x,,~:
(Cf. (3.3.7)).Denote by % k ' A ->
Am ->
Ak
(mkk), the canonical maps (cf. (3.3.6)). As usual we identify M A k ) and Z;(M(Ak))
(Cf.
(3.2.7)).
We have a(nm(fl),...,~m(fn))
a(xS(f,),...,xs(f,,))
for a l l m,s ( s k m ) . where a(xs(fl),...,xs(fn)) trum of the elements xs(fl),...,%s(fn) By (1.4.2) there exists for each m
t
c
P(M(A))c u,
denotes the joint spec-
As.
c
N a unique continuous algebra
homomorphism
am: Hol(U) ->
Am,
such that
(*I
i)
...,
= xm(fi), i=l, n, and
ii) e m ( g f = g.clM(Am) for a l l g
E
Hol(U).
(Note that cp(xm(fi)) = x&(tp)(fi), for i=l,...,n
and for a l l
'Q E
M(Am).)
For Sam the homomorphism
x
s .m
0 8 ~ : H o l ( U->)
A ,
is continuous and satisfies i) and ii) of
(*I. Hence
by the uniqueness assertion of (1.4.2). I t follows that
8,: Hol(U) ->
A =
(8m(g))m
i s a we1 i-defined continuous homomorphism which has the required properties 1) and ii).
Holomorphic functional calculus
131
A be another continuous homomorphism which f u l -
Let t: Hol(U) ->
f i l l s i) and ii).Then x m - t = 8" f o r a l l m c N. by the uniqueness o f the homomorphisms
(6.1.3) Let S
c
em and it
follows that t = 8.,
0
Cn be an arbitrary set. Recall from (1.4.1) the defini-
tlon of the algebra H(S). Corollary. Let A be an F-algebra. and l e t fl,
...,fn
E
A. There exists
a unique continuous homomorphism
8F: H(P(M(A))) ->
A
such that
1) 8,(Zi)
= fi, i=l, ...,n and
ii) 8,(glA
5-P for
=
all
c
H(PMA))),
denote the germs o f the coordinate functions.
where
Proof. Let U. W c Cn be open sets so that f?((M(A)) c U c W. Denote by rU,Wthe natural restriction mapping Hol(W) ->
Hol(U), f ->
and denote by 8;: Hol(U) ->
flu
A the unique homomorphism o f (6.1.2).
Then
(*I
8F*ru,w = 8:
by the uniqueness assertion of (6.1.2). Now l e t
9" E
H(C(M(A1)) be an arbitrary element, and l e t g
be a representative of
9"
c
Hol(U)
in an open neighbourhood U of P(M(A)).
Set
8&)= It follows from
8$g).
(*I that 8,(5) is a well-defined mapping and it is
easy to check that 8, is in fact a homomorphism, which has the required properties i) and ii). (Recat 1 that
9"
E
H(F(M(A))) and x
E~A(A)).)
g ( ~is)
well-defined for
132
Chapter 6
To see that 8, is continuous l e t U be an arbitrary open neighbourhood of p (M(A I) and denote by T, the natural mapping H ~ I ( U )->
T,,:
Then 8,.
H ( ~ I ( A ) ) ) , g ->
5.
= 8,U by the definition o f 8,. 1.e. 8 , o r U
T,
is continuous
for each open neighbourhood U, so 8, is continuous by (1.4.1). Let 0 : H@(M(A))) ->
A be another continuous homomorphism with
the required properties, then
= 8; f or a l l open neighbourhoods
POT,,
U of P(M(A)) by (6.1.21, hence p = 8.,
0
Remark. A weaker form of the holomorphlc functional calculus for F-algebras was f i r s t proved by Arens [ARE 21 and Waelbroeck [WAE] , cf. also Rosenfeld [ROS].
(6.1.4) As an Immediate consequence of the holomorphic functional calculus we can describe the invertible elements of an F-algebra. Corollary. I f A is an F-algebra, then A - ~= {f
Proof. i) I f f
E
E
A: cp(f)
* 0 ,for a i l cp
A - l there exists g
1 = cp(f)cp(g) for a l l cp ii) If cp(f) 9 0 for a l l cp
af: Hol(C*)
->
E
E
E
MA)).
A so that fg = 1, hence
MA).
M A ) . then ?(M(A))
c
C* = C\{Ol. Let
A be as in (6.1.21, then
1 = 8f(z*(1/2)) = 8f(2)8f(1/z) = f . B f ( l / t ) . where z : C*->
C . x->
x.
0
(6.1.5) Shilov's idempotent theorem. Let A be an F-algebra and l e t
E
c
M(A) be an open and closed set. Then there is a unique idem-
potent f
E
A such that
?
Is the characteristic function of E.
Holomorphic functional calculus
133
Proof. Let A = ) L A n (3.3.7). Then
... c
M(An)
c
M(An+l)
c
...
i s an admissible exhaustion of M(A) by (3.3.4) and M(An) f l E is a closed and open subset of M(An) for each n
By (1.4.6) there is a unique idempotent fn characteristic function of M(An) (man) the canonical maps A ,
n E for
c
c
N.
An. so that?,,
is the
each n c N. Denote by xmSn
An (cf. (3.3.6)). then
->
is an idempotent element of An and Gm,,(fm)
=
fn, where
$m,n(fm)
denotes the Gelfand transform of It follows from the uniqueness assertion of (1.4.6) that
xm,n(fm) = fn. Hence f = (fnIn
E
A -, where N
f(x) =
N
A. f ->
{
f,
f(x) if x
€
u
if x
E
M(A)\U
0
A
= U and A,
Holomorphic functional calculus
135
Proof. By our hypothesis U is a hemicompact space, hence
2,
is a
uF-al gebra by (4.1.5). A
We interpret each element of A,
as complex-valued function on U.
which can be approximated uniformly on each compact subset of U by elements of
2.
By Shilov's theorem
xu
h
h
is contained in A. Let f
E
h
A
A,
element. Choose a sequence (fnIn in A such that A
t o f in A .,
Then
(? - x 1 u
be an arbitrary
?Ju converges
N
converges t o f with respect to the com-
n
A
N
pact open topology, hence f
E
A and the map incl is a well-defined
injective and continuous homomorphism. We have
h
A
h
so incl(Au) is a closed subalgebra of A, which is isomorphic to A ., Let K
c
U be a compact subset, then we can show as in the proof o f
(6.1.7) that
RA c
U. hence
by (4.3.4)iii) and it follows from (*I and (3.2.211) that the Gelfand A
topology on M(A,)
coincides with the original topology on U. h
A
Remark. Note that we have proved that A,
c
C(U), i.e. (A,.U)
0
is a
uF-algebra. (6.1.9) In (1.2.6) we established a one-to-one correspondence between the maximal ideals and the elements of M(A) for B-algebras A. As an easy consequence we proved that the ideal, which is generated by fl,...,fr
s A. is proper iff
{cp E M A ) : q ( f l ) = 0 . i=1.
...,r 1 *
0
(cf.(1.2.9)).
The analogous r e s u l t for F-algebras is true (Corollary (6.1.10) below) but requires much more effort. It was f i r s t proved by Arens
[ARE 11. We give a generalization of this r e s u l t due to Brooks [BRO 21.
136
Chapter 6
Theorem [BRO 21. Let A be an F-algebra and l e t (a,),
be a se-
quence In A such that
Then there exists a sequence (bnIn In A such that
E
aibi = 1,
i=1 i.e. the sequence of the partial sums converges t o 1. Proof. Let (p,),
be a defining sequence o f seminorms f o r A (cf.
(3.1.7) and r e c a l l in particular that p, s P,+~ (3.2.6) the definitions of the algebras A,
f o r a l l n). Recall from
and of the norms p" , resp.
from (3.3.6) the definitions of the maps nn,k (nrk). As usual ( cf. (3.2.7))
we identify M A n ) and r:hl(An)).
We divide the proof into
several steps. i) Set 1,
= 1 and choose for each n
(*I
M(An)
n {cp
E
E
N an integer in so that
M(A): q(al) = cp(a2) =
and in>$,-,, hence in>nfor a l l nc
... = p(al,)
N.
Suppose this choice is not possible. Then, for each k cpk
E
= 0) = 0
c
N, there i s
M(An) such that qk(a1) = qk(a2) =
= qk(ak) = 0.
Since M(An) is compact, a subsequence of (9k)k converges t o an element cp c M(An). Hence by continuity cp(ai) = 0 for a l l i c N. and we get a contradiction.
11) Let (&,,In be a sequence of posltive numbers such that We f i r s t prove by induction that for every n X~~),....X(~) c
in
a)
k
i=l
A,
so that
xn(ai)x/n) = 1,
E
c 8,
< ao.
N there exist elements
Holomorphic functional calculus
Note that
137
(*I implies that
{cp
E
6 n c e each A,
M A n ) : cp(xn(al))
=
... = p ( x n(ain1)
is a B-algebra, we always find zl.
a) is f u l f i l l e d (cf. (1.2.9)). For n=l the conditions B) and y) are vacuous. Now l e t n > l and suppose that x1(n-1) ,....x (n-1) in-1
been chosen. Let zl, ...,z trary t i ,...
= 01 = 0.
in
c
c
....zin c A,
so that
An-1 have already
A, so that a ) is fulfilled. Choose arbi-
E A and set t;=O for in-l 0 iff f c (An)-' by (1.1.5). We f i r s t choose bl c (A1)-', g1 c C(M(A1)) so that f l M( A l )
(Recall that f
Q
= 61exp(g,)
(cf. (1.4.8)).
C(kM(A1) iff flM(An) t C(M(A,))
for a l l n
t
N.)
We now use the proposition to choose inductively sequences (bnIn and (gnIn such that for a l l n c N 1) b,
E
(An)-',
gn c C(M(A,)); A
ii) flM(An) = bnexp(gn); ill) p i (xn+l,,,(bn+l) iv)
Now fix n
t
IIgn+J M ( A n )
-
b,)
- gn'lM(An)
N, and l e t k > l k n . Then
.
< 2 -("+')- m i d l ,dl( b, 1,. .,dn( bn)l; < 2-(n+1)
Chapter 6
144
It follows that (%ksn(bk))kanis a Cauchy sequence in A.,
Denote
the limit by an. I n particular we have by (*I
f o r a l l k c N. So p;l(an-bn) s (1/2)dn(bn), i.e. a,
E
(A,) -1
.
I t follows from iv) that (gklM(An))kan is a Cauchy sequence In
C(M(A,)),
hence converges t o an element h, c C(M(A,)).
We have
flM(An) = %k,n (bk)exp(gklMcAn)) for a1 I k m by ii), A
where %k,n(bk) denotes the Gelfand transform of "k,,,(bk).
Hence
for each p c M(An) f(p ) = i i m % k,n(bk)(p)eXp(gk('p)) = $,(p)exp(h,(p)), -> aD flM(An)
n
= anexp(hn). I t i s easily seen that
I
= h, fo r a l l n
and hn+l Mw,)
ments a
E
a
= a.,
aIM(A,,)
A and h A
E
= a,
N. So (an),, and (hnIn define eien
c
C(kM(A)) so that f = aexp(h1. Since
A
a never vanishes on M(A), hence a
E
A - l by (6.1.4).,,
Corollary. Let A be an F-algebra. Suppose that M(A) i s a k-space. e.g. a locally compact space or a space which satisfies the f i r s t axiom of countability. Then for each f c C(M(A))-' there exist g
c
A-l
and h c C(M(A)) so that f = Gexp(h). Remarks. I ) The theorem was stated f i r s t
-
without proof
- by Arens
[ARE 31. The proof above is due to Brooks [BRO 11. 1 ii) One can use the Arens-Royden theorem to describe H (kM(A).Z).
the f i r s t Cech cohomology group of kM(A) with coefficients in 2. H'(kM(A)) is isomorphic to A-'/exp(A)
for each F-algebra A [BRO 11.
145
Arens-Royden theorem
(Note that exp(A) is a subgroup of A’lJ
Hence, if M ( A ) Is a k-space.
then H1(M(A)) is isomorphic to A-’/t?xp(A). iii)
In the next chapter we shall construct an F-algebra A such that 1
M(A) is not a k-space. It is unproved whether H (M(A)) = H’(kM(A)) in this example.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
147
CHAPTER 7 AN F-ALGEBRA WHOSE SPECTRUM I S NOT A K-SPACE
The results of (6.2) provide interest to the question whether the spectrum of an F-algebra is always a k-space. The following example due to Dors [DOR] shows that it is not always the case. Furthermore we consider this example also in connection with the following problems: i) Given an F-algebra A and a subalgebra B. When can a l l elements
of M(B) be extended to elements of M A ) ? ii) Give conditions such that the weak Nullstellensatz is valld for a
uF-a1 gebra (A,X). (7.1) The example of Dors (7.1.1) We f i r s t introduce the concept of dimension for complex spaces. Let X, Y be topological spaces. We say that a map
I[:
X
-*
Y is
discrete i f x-'(y) is a discrete subset of X for each y c Y. Definition. Let A be an analytic subset of an open subset U let x
E
c
Cn. and
A. Then
dim,A
= min{k c N: There exists an open neighbourhood V o f
x in A and a discrete holomorphic map
I[:
V ->
Ck I .
i s called the dimension of A at x. If dim,A=k
for a l l x
E
A we say that A is of pure dimension k.
Remarks. i) Let dim,A=k.
then there i s a neighbourhood U of x in A
Chapter 7
148
such that dim Ask for a l l y a U. Y ill Note that dimxAsn if A is an analytic subset o f a domain in Cn. ill) I f x i s a regular point, 1.e. if there exists a neighbourhood U of x
in A such that U is biholomorphically equivalent t o some domain in Ck , then dlmxA=k. One can show that dimxA = supik a N: I n every open neighbourhood of x In A there is a regular point y such that dim A=k). Y (Recall from remark (2.3.1)ii) that the set of a i l regular points lies dense in A,) iv) Let X be a reduced complex space, and l e t x
X. Let (UI,pI,XI)
E
be
a chart around x (cf. definition ( 2 . 3 . 1 ) ~ ) )then ~ set dimxX = dimpi(x)Xi. It can be shown that the definition i s independent of the chosen
charts. v) As a consequence o f the maximum principle we see that a com-
pact analytic subset A c U c Cn consists of finitely many points. Hence dimxA=O for a l l XLA.
vi) Let A
c
G
c
Cn (n22) be an analytic subset such that dim,Agn-2
f o r a l l x a A. Then every f
E
o f Hol(G), i.e. there exists
f" E
Hol(G\A) can be extended to an element .u
Hol(G) such that f IG,*=f
(Riemann
extension theorem, second form). vii) Let A be a proper analytic subset of G. Then f
led locally bounded if each a
c
E
Hol(G\A) is cal-
A has a neighbourhood U in G so that
sup{if(x)i: x a U\A) < a.
If f
a
Hoi(G\A) is locally bounded, then f can be extended to a hoio-
morphic function
viii) Let U
c
r" on G (Riemann extension
theorem, f i r s t form).
Cn (n22) be an open set, and l e t f
V(f)={x
E
u: f(x)
E
Hol(U). I f
= 0)
is not empty, then V ( f ) is an analytic subset of U such that dimxV(f)
2
n-1 for a l l x a V(f).
An F-algebra whose spectrum is not a k-space In fact the following is true: Let A that dimxA2k for a point x o f x, and l e t f A' = A n { y and dimxA'
c
U be an analytic subset such
A. Let W
E
149
c
U be an open neighbourhood
Hol(W) such that f(x)=O. Then
E
W: f(y) = 0) is an analytic subset o f a suitable open set
E
k-1. cf. [G/R].
2
p. 115.
i x ) Now consider the following situation: Let fl.....fr
E
Hol(Ck), and
I et A = (x
E
be nonempty. For x
A we have dimxV(flPn-l
E
dimxV(fl)nV(f2bn-2 dimxA
2
...= fr(x)=Ol
Ck: fl(x)=
and
by viii). Continuing in this manner we see that
maxh-r.01.
Hence, if n > r, A cannot be compact. (7.1.2)Example.
Set CN =
n
4: (countable many copies with the nrN
product topology),
wk
= ((xnIn
xn= 0 for j>k)
o CN:
and
Kk =
((Xnln
E
wk:
lXil
S
k for l
C,
(XJn
xk '
->
Define
P(Kk) = i f : Kk ->
C , f can be approximated uniformly on
Kk by polynomials in tl,...,zk). Then P(Kk) is a uB-algebra and
(*I
M(P(Kk)) = Kk,
since Kk (interpreted as a subset of C
k is poIynomiaIIy convex (cf.
(1.2.4)ii)). Set A = < l -i m P(Kk). Then A is a uF-algebra. M(A) = U Kk
(as sets)
Chapter 7
150
and ( K k l k is an admlssible exhaustion o f M ( A ) with respect t o the Gelfand topology, cf. (3.3.4). Set
X = {(xnIn Clearly X
n Kk
c
U K k : I x , l < l for a l l i
c
N).
i s an open s e t (with respect t o the induced Gelfand
topology on Kk, which equals the original topology on Kk by each k
E
(*I) f o r
N.
Claim. X is not Gelfand open, i.e. M(A) is not a k-space. Suppose X is Gelfand open. We have 0 = (0.0.....1 a r e f,
.....fr
(**I
ty
c
E
X. hence there
A so that
M(A): IPi(y)-P,(o)l
r . Hence g
,,..,,
A
{Y
A
w r + 1 ' fiIwr+,(y) =fi(0). i=l, ...r)
is unbounded, a contradiction t o
(**I.
Remarks.1) Another example is due t o Hayes and Vigue [H/V 21. They constructed even a reduced complex space X with countable topology, such that M(HoI(X)) i s not a k-space. ii) It was proved by Warner [WAR] that the spectrum M(A) o f an F-
algebra i s a k-space Iff C(M(A)) is an F-algebra.
(7.2) Surjectlvity of the transpose map
Let A,B be F-algebras, and l e t T: A ->
8 be a continuous algebra
homomorphism. We showed in (3.2.5) that the transpose map
Surjectivity of the transpose map
T'
M(A),
M(B) ->
~p
->
151
TOT,
is injective f T has dense range. I n this section we deal w i t h the surjectivity of T*. (7.2.1) For n
E
N set
= {(f,
U,(A)
,...,f,)
E
A": There is (gl
,...,9),
A" so that
E
n-
c
i=l For every n
E
T:,
figi = 1).
N we have a natural mapping
A" ->
Note that Tn(Un(A))
,...
B", (fl ,fn) -> c
(T(fl)
,...,T(fn)).
Un(B). since we always assume that T(1) = 1.
Further denote by Uw(A) the set of a l l sequences (fnInin A so that there is another sequence (gnIn in A such that
c 9ifi = 1.
iEN
Set
Theorem. Let A, B be F-algebras, and l e t T: A ->
B be a continuous
algebra homomorphism with T(l)=l. Then T*(M(B)) = M(A) iff
(T~)-~(u~(= B )u)~ ( A ) . Proof. First note that (f,,),, each cp
E
E
M(A) there exists i
1
Uw(A) (resp. ( fl.....fn E
N (resp. i
E
E
U,(A))
i f f for
{l, ...,n l ) so that cp(fi)
* 0,
cf. (6.1.9).
We always have U,(A)
c
(Tw)-l(Uw(B)).
I ) Suppose that T*(M(B)) = M(A). Let (fn)n cp
E
E
(
n
A)\Uw(A) be an arbitrary element. Then there exists naN
M(A) so that cp(fn) = 0 for a l l n
E
N. Choose
9
E
M(B) such that
152
Chapter 7
T*(J,) = cp, i.e. J,oT = cp, then J,(T(fn)) = 0 for a l l n
ii) Suppose there Is cp
E
N, i.e.
M(A)\T*(M(B)).
Then we flnd for each J, c M(B) an element f J,(T(fJ,))
E
* 0 and cp(fJ,) = 0.
J,
E
A such that
By continuity there exists a neighbourhood U of J, in M(B) such that $(T(f,,,))
J,
*0
for a i l
6
E
U6.
Since M(B) is hemlcompact there exists a sequence
In M(B) so
that
.
M(B) = U U 1 6 N $1 Hence we have
= 0 for a l l I c N and
a) P(fJ,i)
B) for each It follows that (T(f
5E
M(B) there is n
N such that $(T(f
E
)Iic UoD(B), while (f Ii E $1
Qi
JIn
1)
*
0.
n A \ UoD(A).
ieN
0
(7.2.2) We remark that (Tm)-'(Um(B)) = U,(A)
(*I
(T,,)-~(u~(B)) = u,(A)
for a i l n
E
implies that
N.
This leads t o the question whether the weaker condition (*I already guarantees the surjectivity of T*. We shall show below that in general this is not the case. However we have the following result. Corollary. Let A, B be F-algebras, and l e t T: A ->
B be a continu-
ous algebra homomorphism such that T(l)=l. Suppose that (*I is satisfied. Then T* is surjective If M(B) is compact, e.g. B is a B-algebra, or i f there is (fl,
...,fn) E A"
such that the map
153
Surjectivity of the transpose map
f: M(A) ->
A
(fl(cp)
Cn. cp ->
....,?,,(cp)),
is injective, e.g. A i s rationally finitely generated. Proof. i) Let M(B) be compact. Suppose that T* is not surjective. We use the same notations as in the proof of ii) of theorem (7.2.1). Repeating this proof we see that there are finitely many points $, ,....$, r
so that
.
M(B) = U U i=l
6
I t f o l ows that ( T ( f ),...,T(f 1) $1 Qr (f,,,,...,f,,+) ii) Let
c
f
E
Ur(B), while
Ar\Ur(A), a contradiction to
(*I.
be injective.
Suppose there is cp
E
M(A)\T*(M(B)). Then
M A ) : cp(fi) = Jl(fi). i=1,
{cp) = {$
E
(fl-p(fl),
...,fn-cp(fn))
...,n).
Hence
A"\u,(A)
I
but (T(f l-cp(f 1 ) ) ,...,T(fn-cp(fn)))
E
Un(B)
I
a contradiction to (*I. (Actually we have proved a stronger result. Namely if then T* is surjective if (Tn)-'(Bn) = An.)
f
is injective, 0
(7.2.3) Finally we use the example of Dors (7.1.2) to show that condition ( * ) o f (7.2.2) in general does not imply the surjectivity of T*. We use the same notations as in (7.1.2). Set Dk = {(x,,),,
z
Kk: l ~ ~ 1 < 1 / 2 i=l, . ...,k}
and
Ek = Kk\Dk.
Ek is a compact set for each k
E
N and
Chapter 7
154
...->
C(Ek+l)
-> C(Ek) Ik
_*
...
constitutes a dense projective system of uB-algebras with respect t o the natural restriction mappings
Set B = & L C ( E n ) . Then B is a uF-algebra by (4.1.3) and M(B) = U M(C(En)) = U En neN nE N
8 Is the algebra of
as sets by (1.2.4111 and (3.3.4).
ued functions f on U En such that
fl
a l l complex-val-
is continuous f or a l l k
E
N.
Ek
Let A = f L P ( K n ) be the algebra o f Dors example. Interpret each ? €
^A as complex-valued
function on U Kn, which can be approximated
uniformly on each Kn by polynomials. Then n n
A
T: A ->
B,f ->
1"
n
f
defines a continuous homomorphism and
T*(M(@)) =
u E,
* u K,
= M&.
i.e. T* is not surjective. (Note that we can naturally identify M(A) and M(^A).) Now f i x k x
E
E
*k A N, and l e t (il,...,tk) E A \Uk(A). Hence there exists
U Kn such that i l ( x ) =
v
= {y
6
... = gko() = 0,w.1.o.g.
wk+1: B l ( y ) =
A
x
c
K,.
The set
A
..a
= gk(y) = 0)
is not empty and we conclude as in (7.1.2) that V (interpreted as a subset o f Ck+') is unbounded, i.e. there exists
Weak Nullstellensatz
155
Remark. Corach and Suarez [C/S] proved that the condition
(*I is
equivalent t o the surjectivity of T* in the case that A and B are Balgebras. The proof o f theorem (7.2.1) is a suitable modification of their proof. (7.3) The weak Nullstellensatz (7.3.1) Definition. The weak Nullstellensatz is valid for a uF-algebra
(A,X) if for every finite set of functions fl.....fm zero in X there exist functions gl,...,gm m fig1 = 1. i=l
E
a
A with no common
A such that
c
(7.3.2) Remarks. i) We use the terminology of Hayes [HAY 21. This terminology is motivated by a theorem in algebraic geometry referred t o as the weak Nullstellensatz. It states that every proper ideal in in a polynomial ring K[T l,...,Tn]
in n variables with coefficients in
an algebraically closed field K has at least one zero in Kn. Since K[T1,...,T,,]
is Noetherian, this is equivalent t o saying that finitely
many elements in K[T
l... ..Tn]
without common zero never generate
a proper ideal. ii) Recall from (2.2.7) that for domains G
c
Cn the following is true:
The weak Nullstellensatz is valid for (Hoi(G).G) if G is a domain of holomorphy resp. iff M(Hol(G))=G. This result does not hold in our general setting as we shall see below. iii) I t follows from (6.1.10) that the weak Nullstellensatz is valid for
&.M(A)) i f A is a uF-algebra.
156
Chapter 7
(7.3.3) Theorem. The weak Nullstellensatz is valid f or a uF-algebra
iff
F(X) = P(M(A)) fo r a l l F c Am and a l l m
...,),f
(For (f,,
E
PMA))
E
N.
Am we set F(X) = ((f,(x),...,fm(x))
= {tPl(x)
Proof. The inclusion
"c"
c
Cm: x
X I and
E
....,fm(x)) E cm:x E M(A)).) A
i s always true.
i) Suppose that the weak Nullstellensatz is valid for (A.X). Assume there is m
E
N and f r Am such that
P(M(A))\F(x)* 0 . We choose a point (A,, ...,) ,A fm-Am
in this set. The functions f 1- A 1'""
have no common zero In X, hence there are gl,..,gm
that
m
c
i=l
E
A so
(fi-Ai)gi = 1.
This implies m (?i-Ai'^al i=l
c
= 1,
a contradiction to the fact that ?l-X1s...s?m-Xm
have a common zero
in M A ) .
ill Now letF(X) = h ~ l ( A ) fo ) r all f
,...,,g
Let g1
c
E
Am.
A be without common zero in X. Then
8,. ...,g, A
have
(7.3.4)Corollary. i) The weak Nullstellensatz Is valid for a uF-algebra (A,X) if the structure map j: X ->
M(A). x ->
cpx, (cf. (4.2.1))
is surjective.
ill If (A,X) is a uF-algebra and there is F
E
Am such that
Weak Nu1I stel lensatz
F: MA)
ern
->
157
is injective, e.g. if A is rationally finitely gener-
ated, then the weak Nullstellensatz is valid iff j is surjective. Proof. i) This is a direct consequence o f theorem (7.3.3). ii) If j is not surjective we find a point x
Q
M(A)\j(X). Since
e
is in-
jective we have
P(M(A))\F(x),
A
F (XI
and our assertion follows from (7.3.3).
El
(7.3.5) We use the example of Dors (7.1.2) to show that in general the converse of statement i) is false. We use the notations of (7.1.2) and (7.2.3): wk =
{(Xnln
t
Kk =((Xn),, Dk =
E
{(Xnln
E
CN:
X1
wk:
lXil
Kk:
lXil
= 0,j>k),
...,k), i=1, ...,k)
k. i=1,
< 1/2,
and Ek = Kk\Dk. Let A = &&P(Kn)
be the algebra in the example of Dors. Recall that
M(A) = U Kk as sets, that (Kk)k is an admissible exhaustion of M(A) with respect to the Gelfand topology. and that
^A
is the algebra of a l l complex-valued
functions on U Kk which can be approximated uniformly on each Kn by polynomials. Set X = U Ek, and endow X with the relative Gelfand topology. Note that (EkIk is an admissible exhaustion o f X. i.e.
X is a hemicompact space. Consider the restriction mapping h
r : A ->
h
Al,f
A
->
A
fl,.
Clearly r is a surjective algebra homomorphtsm. Let r(?) = 0. Then A
1
0
f o r every k
L
N.
158
Chapter 7 A
Since we can interpret ,fl have
?Iwk
k
k as a holomorphic function on 41 , we
m 0 by the identity theorem, i.e.
? * 0,
and r i s injective.
Moreover it follows from the maximum modulus principle for hoiomorphic functions that
A
1.e. r is a topological homomorphism. So (AI,.X)
is a uF-algebra.
which is isomorphic to ( h l ( A ) ) and we see that j:
M(AI,) A
x ->
= M(A)
is not surjective. A
A
A
NOW
l e t gl(x,...,gklx
E
be arbitrary elements without common
zero on X.Then we see as in example (7.2.3) that tj,.....gk A
a common zero on M(A)=M(A),
e "h;gl
i-1
hence there are
6 , ,...,fik
A
c
don't have
2 so
that
= 1,
by (6.1.10). i.e. the weak Nuilstellensatz is valid for (hA),,X).
(7.3.6) Remarks. i) Nevertheless the validity of the weak Nullsteliensatz implies that the structure map j has dense range in M A ) . Otherwise there would be a point x
E
M ( A ) and a Gelfand open neigh-
bourhood U of x,
u = {y
E
M(A): i?p)-?,(y)i
< 1, i = i ,...,r i ,
(cf. (3.2.2111) such that
U
c
M(A)\j(X).
But this would imply that
Pw =
(?,(xi.
....fn(x))
?(M(A))\F(x),
and we get a contradiction to theorem (7.3.3).
f,
...,f r
E
A,
Weak Nu1l s t e l lensatz
159
ii) The converse of remark i) is false.
For instance l e t
5 = (1x1 i 1).
X =
B\
(01,and l e t A be the algebra
of a l l functions on X which can be approximated uniformly by polynomials on each compact subset of X. Then (A,X) is a uF-algebra which is algebraically and topologically isomorphic t o the algebra
P ( 5 ) . We have M(P(B)) = j: X ->
by (1.2.4)iI). hence
-
M(A) = D,
has dense range, but Z(X)
* ~(M(A))
for the map Z:
-D ->
C . x ->
X.
So the weak Nullstellensatz is not valid for (A.X) by (7.3.3). iii) I n [HAY 23 Hayes constructed a hemicompact reduced complex
space X so that the weak Nullstellensatz is valid for (Hol(X),X) but j is not surjective.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
161
CHAPTER 8 SEMIS 1MPLE F- ALGEB RAS
An F-algebra A is called semisimple if the Gelfand map
f ->
r: A ->
h
A.
A
f . is injective. I n particular each uF-algebra is semisimple by
the proof of (4.1.3). I n this chapter we prove two results for semisimple F-algebras. Firstly we show that each semisimple F-algebra has a unique topology as an F-algebra. This extends the analogous r e s u l t for semisimple B-algebras (1.2.12). Secondly we prove that each derivation D on A is automatically continuous. (By a derivation we mean a linear mapping D: A -> f o r a l l f.g
E
A so that D(fg) = f D(g)+gD(f)
A.) We remark that, opposite t o the situation for semi-
simple 8-algebras, there exist nontrivial derivations on semisimple F-algebras. Both results are due t o Carpenter [CAR
11 and
[CAR 53.
(8.1) Uniqueness of topology (8.1.1)Definition. The radical of an algebra A is the intersection of a l l maximal ideals in A . It is denoted by rad A. A is called semi simple i f rad A = (0). (8.1.2) Proposition. An F-algebra A is semisimple i f f the Gelfand map
r: A ->
h
A, f ->
A
f,
i s injective. Proof. I t suffices to show that rad A = fl qtM(A)
ker C Q .
162
Chapter 8
Certainly rad A Now l e t x
(*I
L
c
n ker
cp.
ker cp for a l l p
E
M A ) . Then
cp(l-xy) = 1 for each cp
E
M(A). and a l l y
hence l - x y is invertible by (6.1.4) for each y
E
L
A.
A.
Suppose there is a maximal ideal M in A so that x
L
A\M.
The smallest ideal which contains M and x is A. Hence there is y and m
E
M. so that 1 = xy + m, i.e. 1
diction t o
- xy
E
E
A
M, and we get a contra-
(*I.
0
(8.1.3) Remarks. i) Each uF-algebra is semisimple by the proof of (4.1.3). ii) Let A = CaD([O,l])
(cf. (3.3.5)). Then M ( A ) = [0,1] by (3.3.5) and
A is not a uF-algebra by (4.1.4)iv). Let f x
c
M A ) , hence f(x)=O for a l l x
E
E
rad A, 1.e. ?(x)=O for a l l
So fmO and A is semisimple
[0,1].
by (8.1.2). (8.1.4) Proposition. Let A be an F-algebra. Let of distinct points in M A ) . Then there exists h
be a sequence E
A so that (cpi(h))l
i s a sequence of distinct points in the plane. Proof. For i*j set
Aij = t f
E
A: cpl(f) = cpj(f)}.
Obviously A
is a closed subset o f A. Let (pnIn be a defining seii quence of seminorms for A. cf. (3.1.7). Suppose that A has nonil empty interior. Then there are f E A n E N such that li ' tg Choose u
E
E
A : pn(f-g) < l / n }
A
-
ii A such that cpi(u) = 0 and cp (u) = 1 by (3.2.3). If pn(u)=O
then pn(f-(f+u)) be a derivation. Let
be a sequence o f distinct points in M(A) so
('pill
that the functionals 'pIoD: A -> Then there exists c
E
D ( d . is unbounded on
A
C are discontinuous for a l l i
c
N.
A such that 6 ( c ) , the Gelfand transform of ('pi)i.
Proof. First note that D(c-1) = 0 for a l l c
E
C.
Let (pill be a defining sequence of seminorms f o r A (cf. (3.1.7) and r e c a l l in particular that pnspn+l we can assume that each
(*I
I'pi(f)i
P
'pi
and pn(l)=l for a l l n
E
N). W.I.0.g.
is continuous with respect to pi, i.e.
pi(f) for a l l f c A, i E N.
According to (8.1.4) we can choose a sequence (fk)k in A so that cp(f = 0 for j ll&(Ak),"-
I t follows that U
n M(AP1 contains
a local peak set for A
By P' Rossi's maximum principle (1.4.9) V contains a peak set for A so P' V n yA 0 . Since V was taken t o be arbitrary and yA Is closed, P P hence we see that Jl c yA P'
*
Repeating the l a s t argument for W and r A we conclude that
'Q E
FA
as desired.
0
(9.1.4)Remark and notation.Let A be a B-algebra. I t follows from (9.1.3) that r A = yA in thls case. So we shall denote henceforth the Shilov boundary of an F-algebra A by yA, too. (9.1.5) Example. Proposition (9.1.3) fails t o be true if M(A) is not locally compact.
For n
L
N define the following sets in C2: 'n = {(t,t/n): t e C0.13), n K n = {(z,w): n ( w - ( z / i ) ) = 0 , l z l i=1
1, i wi
1)
and
K;I = Kn U In+l. i) We claim that Kn and K;I are polynomially convex compact sets.
This is clearly true for Kn. Let (x.y) Case 1: (x,y) L C 2\Kn+l. Then, since Kn+,
Q
2
C \KA
.
is polynomially convex, we find a polynomial q
Shilov boundary f o r Fr6chet algebras
175
such that Iq(x,y)l > llqllKk. Case 2: (x.y) Then x
E
E
Kn+,.
C\[O.l]
and we find a polynomial q in one variable so that
Iq(xN = 1 > llqll[o,,]*
since [O,l]
is polynomially convex, cf. (1.2.4).
Set r(2.w) = q(z). then
Furthermore consider
m sufficiently large. ill We note that
(*I
... c
Kn
Set A = l&P(K',).
c
K;1
c
Kn+l
c
K"+l
c
... .
Then A is a doubly generated uF-algebra. Note
that a defining sequence of seminorms is given by
(ll-llKh)n and
that
We have M(A) = U K', (as sets) and (KInIn is an admissible exhaustion of M(A) by (5.1.6). ill) Claim: (0.0)E yP(K',)
Let (x,y)
E
for all n
N.
In+1 \C(O.O)> be an arbitrary point, and l e t U be an open
neighbourhood of (x,y) in K;1. Set
and
E
176 Hence
Chapter 9
- for
sufficiently large m
I t follows that yP(K;l)nU
*
-
0. Since U was chosen t o be arbitrary,
and since yP(K;I) is closed, we see that (x.y)
In+l\{(O,O)l
c
E
yP(K;I), hence
yP(Kh) and finally (0,O) E yP(KA).
iv) Define
U = {(z,w)
M(A) = U K;I: lzi I?,(Y)I
I?,(x)I
for a l l y c K\U.
Thus I(efu)A(x)i > I(ef,)^(y)i
f o r a l l y c M(A)\U,
where (efu)^ denotes the Gelfand transform of ef,. this observation that x
E
It follows from
yA.
0
(9.1.7) Proposition. Let A be an F-algebra such that y A = 0. Then A
each element of A satisfies the maximum principle on M(A), 1.e.
Ilf I,
(*I for a l l
A
=
Ilf ,I
? c 2 and a l l
compact subsets K
M A ) . (Here dK denotes
c
the boundary o f K.) Vice versa, if M ( A ) i s locally compact and
(*I is satisfied, then
y A = 0. Proof. i) Let y A = 0 . By (9.1.6) dK
K
c
+ 0 for
a l l compact subsets
M(A).
Suppose there exists a compact set K c M ( A ) and
? c ^A
so that
M ( A 1. Then by Rossi's P maximum principle (1.4.9) - there exists cp E int M ( A 1 n y A where P P' int M ( A 1 denotes the interior of M ( A 1 with respect t o the Gelfand P P topology on M A ) . Repeating the proof of proposition (9.1.3)ii) (re-
Choose a seminorm p c P(A) such that K
c
place Ak by A ) one sees that cp c yA. This is impossible. P ii) Let (pnIn be a defining sequence of seminorms. Assume
(*I, then
178
Chapter 9
YAP,
c
dM(A
1 for a l l n
Pn
c
N.
Since M(A) is locally compact we have f or each k
n MA
nkk
1=
Pn
E
N
0,
so
n YA~,= 0,
nkk
hence yA = 0 by (9.1.3).
0
(9.1.8) Example. We construct a uF-algebra A such that
(*I of
(9.1.7) is satisfied but yA 8 0 (hence M A ) is not locally compact). For n c N set
Every Kn is polynomially convex (cf. (1.2.4)ii)).
Set A =
C , continu-
ous or not. We endow S(A) with the Gelfand topology, that is the h
coarsest topology such that a l l Gelfand transforms ? c A are contlnuous functions on S(A). A basis for the neighbourhood system of a point cp
E
S(A) is given by a l l sets of the form
cf. (3.2.2111. We know by (1.2.1) that S(A) = M(A) for B-algebras. Michael [MIC] posed the question as whether the same is true for F-algebras. This question is s t i l l unanswered. Arens [ARE 11 proved that S(A) = M A ) i f A is a rationally finitely generated F-algebra. Besides some other results we sketch in this chapter an approach t o this problem due to Dixon and Esterle [D/E],
which leads t o an
interesting problem in the theory of several complex variables.
(10.1) Results on the automatic contlnuitv o f characters (10.1.1)Lemma. M(A) is a dense subset of S(A) for each F-algebra A. Proof. Suppose the lemma is false. Then there are cp fl*....,f n c A such that
E
S(A).
186
Chapter 10
Set Xi = p(fi) and gi = fl-Xi,
i=1,
...,n. Then g1,....gn have no common n
n
zero on M(A), hence by (6.1.10) there are hl,...,hn
E
A such that
n
higl = 1. i=1 But this leads t o a contradiction, since 9,. ...,gn
E
ker p. which i s a
proper ideal in A.
0
(10.1.2) Remark. One easily sees that if X is a topological space and
Y Is a k-space, then every continuous map f: X ->
Y which i s prop-
er is closed. Now consider the map
M A ) ->
S(A),
->
p.
I t is continuous and it is also proper. (Otherwise there would be a
compact set K
c
S(A) such that K f M(A) l is not compact. Copying
the proof of (4.3.6) bounded on K
-
-
using (3.2.6)
we find f
n M(A), a contradiction to
E
A so that
?
is un-
the compactness of K.)
Hence, if S(A) is a k-space, then the map is closed and we have M(A) = S(A) by (10.1.1). (10.1.3) Let (fl
,...,fn) E An Then set
P: S(A) ->
Cn , cp ->
n
(fl(p)
,....fn(p)).
Proposition. Let A be an F-algebra, and l e t (fl,....fn)
E
An. Then
PMAN = PMA)). Proof. Suppose there exists X E P(S(A))\P(M(A)). Set g1 = fi-Xi.l (i=l,
....n)
and continue as in the proof of (10.1.11.
(10.1.4) Theorem. Let A be an F-algebra. Suppose there are
(f,.....f,,)
E
An such that for each p
E
M(A) the set
f-V(p,)n M(A) is at most countable, then S(A) = M(A).
0
Michael's problem Proof. Let
187
IJ 6 S(A) be an arbitrary element. Choose
(10.1.3) such that
p(cpo)= f($). The
cpo c M(A) by
set
is at most countable by our hypothesis, hence
- by
(8.1.4)
-
we
n
find fn+l c A so that fn+l i s injective on S. (If f is finite use (3.2.31.1 So, using again (10.1.31,
there is exactly one element p1 E M ( A ) such
that
Let g c A be an arbitrary element. Then pl(g) = $(g) by (10.1.3) and
(*I. But this implies
p1 = @.
0
Remark. The theorem is due to Zelazko [ZEL 23, the proof i s as in [GOL
31.
(10.1.5) Theorem [MIC],[ARE 11. Let A be an F-algebra. Suppose k k there are ( f l , fk ) c A such that for each z c C the set
....
W Z )
n M(A)
is compact. Then M ( A ) = S(A). Proof. Let $ c S(A) then, by the hypothesis,
K
={Q E
MA):
p($)= p(p)l
is compact. By (10.1.3) K i s not empty.
For each b
E
A the set
u b = {cp c M(A): cp(b)
* IJ(b)l
is open. Suppose that U Ub is an open covering of K. then there are brA bl,
(*I
...,br c A such that K
C
U
bl
U
U Ub;
188
Chapter 10
By (10.1.3) there exists cpo c M(A) so that I) vo(bl) = $(bl)
So po
E
(i=l,...,r),
and
K by ill. which is a contradiction t o 1) and (*I.
Hence there exists
1.e. cp =
JI.
0
(10.1.6) Corollary [ARE 11. I f A is a rationally finitely generated Falgebra then M(A) = S(A). Proof. Let fl,...,fn
be rational generators f or A, then f or each z
E
Cn
the set M(A) n f - ' ( z ) is either empty or,consists of a single point by (5.2.3). So we get the desired r e s ul t from the theorem above. (10.1.7) Examples. i) Let A = C"([O.l])
M(A) = [0,1]
(cf. (3.3.5)). Then
by (3.3.5). Hence M(A) = S(A) by (10.1.41, since
2 : [0,13
_*
defines an element of
c, t
->
t,
2.
ii) Let X be a hemicompact k-space. Then C(X) i s a uF-algebra by
(4.1.4)ii). We claim that
The f i r s t equality was already established in (4.1.7)i). Let (Knln be an admissible exhaustion of X and suppose that there is
J,
c S(C(X))\X.
S(C(X)) is a completely regular space, since it carries the initial topology generated by all Gelfand transforms
?.
f
c
C(X) (cf. [ENS]
(0.2.2).(0.2.3)). Hence we find for each nc N an element
Michael's problem
189
fn c C(S(C(X))) such that I) fn(J,) = 0,
ii) fn(S(C(X))) = co,2-nl,
Note that fnl, f
=
c
C(X). By ill)
c fnl,
nc N
defines an element of C(X) and f(cp) Consider the Gelfand transform
?E
i?(J,)l > E > 0. Choose n E N so that
* 0 for a l l cp
E
X by ii) and 111).
C(S(C(X))). Suppose that
c
2-i < ~ / 4 .Let i>n
Then U is an open neighbourhood of J, and we can choose a point cp
P
M(A) flU by (10.1.11. Hence
a contradiction to cp
E
U. So
f(cp) * 0,
f or a l l cp
E
X, and
= 0,
and we get a contradiction to (10.1.3). ill) A uF-algebra A i s called Stein algebra if there exists a reduced
Stein space X ( c f. (2.3.2)) such that A i s topologically and aigebraically isomorphic to Hol(X), the algebra of a l l holomorphic functions on X endowed with the compact open topology.
I f X is a connected finite dimensional reduced Stein space, then by Remmert's embedding theorem there exists an injective holomorphic mapping into some Cn. Since X = M(Hol(X)) by (2.3.2) we have M(Hol(X)) = S(Hol(X)) by theorem (10.1.4) in this case. (We remark for the sake o f completeness that this res ult remains true f or not
necessarily reduced Stein spaces (X.0) and the algebra Ho(X,O).
190
Chapter 10
For a generalization of this result cf. Ephraim [€PHI.) We give a simple proof rem
-
-
not depending on the deep embedding theo-
for M(Hol(X)) = S(Hol(X)) if (X,p) is a holomorphically se-
parable Riemann domain over Cn. Note that in this case pi (i=l,...,n) Since
6
Hol(X)
cf. (2.2.2). Recall from (2.2.5) that
if p=(p1,...,p,,),
(M(Hol(X)).;)
E
is again a Riemann domain over CnDwhere ;=(p,
A
A
,...,p ,I.
i s a local homeomorphism and M(Hol(X)) is a hemicompact
space we conclude that for each z
c
Cn, fi-l(z) is either empty or
at most countable.(Suppose that this is false. Then ;-l(z) is not countable for some z
c
Cn. Let (KnIn be an admissible exhaustion
of M(Hol(X)), then there is k K~
E
N so that
n 6%)
is not countable, i.e. f-'(z)
has an accumulation point in M(A). and
we get a contradiction.) Now our assertion follows from (10.1.4). (10.21 The aDDroach of Dixon and Esterle
Next we want t o sketch the approach of Dixon and Esterle t o Michael's problem. Their work leads to an interesting problem in several complex variables. Recall that we always consider commutative F-algebras with unit.
(10.2.1) Proposition. Let f
E
Hol(Cn), and l e t al,
...,an be elements
of an F-algebra A. Let f(Zl
c
,z& =
I...
il
,. .,iaO
xI1,...Dinzl
11'.."Zn in
*
be the power series expansion of f (cf. (2.1.51). then
defines an element of A and the map
191
Michael's problem
A" ->
A, (al
,....an
f(al
->
,...,an)
is continuous. Proof. That f(a l.....an)
c
A follows from (6.1.2) (use the same argu-
ment as in (1.4.4)i)). Let (pI II be a sequence o f defining seminorms for A (cf. (3.1.71). and l e t (al(k) ,...,a(k))k be a sequence in An which converges t o n (bl, bn) E An.
...,
Fix arbitrary I
E
N and E>O. Choose r > O so that
pl(ai(k)) < r , i=1,
...,n.
k
E
N
and pl(bi) < r , i=1,
...,n.
Then pI( f (a! ),
+ 2.
...
c
$+...+I n >s
1-f ( bl,. ..,bn1 1 s
I X i1,
...,in
Ir
il+...+ in
For s large enough the value of the second sum i s less than e/2 and the f i r s t sum tends to zero for k -> So we have proved that f(a!k)s...,a(k)) n
(10.2.2) Remark. If F = (f,,...,f k )
E
-.
converges to f(b l.....bn).
HOI(C".Q:
k
1, i.e. fi z HOI(C") for
...,
i=l. k. then the map
An ->
A k , (al
,...,an1 ->
F(al
,...Dan) =
192
Chapter 10
,...,an), ...,fk(al ,...,a,))
= (fl(al
,
is continuous. This is an easy consequence of the proposition.
(10.2.3) Proposition. Let F = (flD....fk) F-algebra. Then, for each a
E
E
Hol(C",C k 1, and l e t A be an
An,
F(a)^ = Fog , where F(a)^ denotes the Gelfand transform of F(a). More precisely: Let cp
E
S(A), then tp(fi(al
Proof. Let cp
E
....,an)) = fi(cp(al) ,...,cp(a,)).
...,k.
S(A). Denote by B the closed subalgebra of A gener-
...,an.
ated by al,
14,
Since cp restricted to B is continuous by (10.1.6)
we get the desired r e s u l t from the definition of fl(a l,...,an).
0
(10.2.4) Theorem. Let (snIn be a sequence of positive numbers. If there is a discontinuous character on an F-algebra A, then the projective limit of every projective system
... -* where F,
E
CS"+1
F , > CS"
->
...
H O I ( C ~ " ~ , C ~ " )is not empty.
Proof. Let cp be a discontinuous character on A. i) Since the closure of ker cp is an ideal and ker cp is a maximal
ideal we see that ker cp is dense in A, cf. (3.2.11). ii) Set
q1 = 0, q, = S~+..,+S,,-~for n > l . If we endow ker cp with the discrete topology then
En = A
S
x (ker pIqn
is a complete metrizable space for a l l n Tn: En+l ->
En, (al
,...,asn+l,xl,
E
N. We consider the map
...,x qn+11 ->
Michael's problem
,...,aSn+l ) + ( x ~ ~..., + xQn+, ~ . ),x p...1x 1. qn
(Fn(al T,
193
is continuous f o r each n
E
N
by (10.2.2) and since ker cp Is en-
dowed with the discrete topology. Moreover Tn(En+l) by 1). Hence we can choose an element 8 =(Bn),
z
is dense in En
lh(En.Tn)
by (3.3.2). For each n
c
N we can write
B, = (bn,xn), b,
E
AS". x, c (ker cp) 4n
.
Since Tn(bn+lsxn+l) = (bn,xn) we have Fn(bn+l)-bn
c
(ker plSn,for a l l n
E
N,
hence by (10.2.3)
(10.2.5) Corollary. Let p
c
N. I f
there exists a sequence (Fnln of
holomorphic mappings from Cp into i t s e l f such that
n F,'
...o
ncN
F,(cP)
= 0 ,
then S(A) = M(A) f o r every F-algebra A.
(10.2.6) Remarks. i) Although the statement of the corollary is very simple, the question of the existence of such a sequence (Fnln
E
Hol(CP,CP) seems t o be a difficult problem. First note that
if one mapping Fi is constant, then
n F~~
...o
F,(cP)
194
Chapter 10
is never empty. So we consider only the case when no Fi is constant.
If p=1, the l i t t l e Picard theorem ([NAR l],p. 94) asserts that each nonconstant entire function attains each value with one possible exception. I t follows that F1o ...* Fn(C) is a dense open subset of C for each n e N. hence
n F,"
...o
F,(c)
is a nonempty subset o f C by Baire's theorem.
If p > l it is known that there are injective entire functions
F: Cp ->
Cp, whose jacobian identically equals one but whose range
is not dense in Cp. So for p > l a sequence with the desired property might exlst. For a detailed discussion of this question we ref er the reader t o the paper o f Dixon and Esterle [DIE]. 11) Clayton [CLA 13, Schottenloher [SCH],
Dixon and Esterle [D/E]
and Craw [CRA 21 constructed test algebras f o r Michael's problem. More precisely they constructed F-algebras A with the property that Michael's problem can be solved iff it can be solved f or A.
195
PART 3 ANALYTIC STRUCTURE IN THE SPECTRUM OF AN F-ALGEBRA
An important subject in the theory of uB-algebras is the question o f the existence of analytic structure in spectra, cf. f o r example chapter I11 of Stout's book [STO]. One seeks for conditions which ensure that parts of the spectrum of a uB-algebra can be endowed with the structure of a complex space in such a way that a l l Gelfand transforms become holomorphic functions on it. As proved in (2.1.13) algebras of holomorphic functions are not uBalgebras but uF-algebras (cf. (2.3.1)). Hence algebras
- we
-
in the case o f uF-
are moreover interested in the question when a given
uF-algebra is topologically and algebraically isomorphic to Hol (XI,
X a suitable complex space. In some cases we shall obtain a function algebraic characterization of certain classes of holomorphic functions, for instance we shall characterize Hol(X) in the case that
X = C. X
c
41 a domain, X a logarithmically convex complete Rein-
hardt domain, X
c
Cn a polynomially convex domain etc.
.
There are results f o r uB-algebras, in particular Rossi's maximum principle (1.4.91, which reminds one of the behavior o f holomorphic functions. This led t o the question whether these results depend on the existence of analytic structure in the spectrum. I n general this turned out to be false. In this part of the book we adopt this problem for uF-algebras and ask to what extend properties of Hol(X) (for example the maximum principle, Liouvil ie's theorem, identity theorem, reflexivity, Montel's theorem, etc. 1 characterize this a l gebra within the class of uF-algebras. I n our setting we shall prove that a uF-algebra has analytic struc-
196
Part 3
ture in every point of i t s spectrum iff it is a Stein algebra, 1.e. iff it is topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o the algebra of al I holomorphic functions on a (reduced) Stein space.( For the definition of Stein spaces cf. (2.31.) Hence, in connection with the problem of finding analytic structure in the spectrum of a uF-algebra. we are interested in characterizing Stein algebras by intrinsic properties within the class of uF-algebras. This project is also interesting, since Stein algebras play an important r o l e in the theory of several complex variables.
197
CHAPTER 11 STEIN ALGEBRAS
For the definition and properties o f Stein spaces cf. (2.2) and (2.3). As mentioned in the introduction t o part 3 of the book we shall prove that a uF-algebra is a Stein algebra iff it has analytic structure in each point of i t s spectrum (11.1) Analytic structure in spectra of uF-algebras (11.1.1)
Definition. A uF-algebra A is called Stein algebra if there
exists a (reduced) Stein space X such that A i s topologically and a l gebraical l y isomorphic to Hol ( X I . Remark. Let A be a Stein algebra, and l e t T: A ->
Hol(X) be an iso-
morphism, X a Stein space. Recall from (2.3.2) that X = M(Hol(X)). more precisely the structure map j: X -> (cf. (2.3.2)) T*: X ->
M(Hol(X)), x ->
cp,
defines a homeomorphism. So the adjoint spectral map
M(A) is a homeomorphism by (3.2.5). Note in particular
that the spectrum of a Stein algebra is always locally compact.Furthermore the map (2.M(A)) ->
(Hol(X)^ ,M(Hol(X))) = (Hal (X),X).
P->
A
faT*,
where Hol(X)^ denotes the algebra of a l l Gelfand transforms, defines a topological homomorphism by (4.2.4). (11.1.2)Definition. Let A be a uF-algebra, and l e t cp z M(A). We say h
that A has analytic structure in cp provided there are an open neighbourhood U of cp in M(A), an analytic subset Y o f a domain
G
c
C"
198
Chapter 11
and a homeomorphism p: Y
-*
?
U such that
0
p
L
Hol(Y) for al I
2.
? €
Remark.Let
(9,
U, Y, p and G be as above. Note that U is locally
compact. Hence there exists an open, hemicompact, re1atively comh
pact and A-convex neighbourhood V of cp such that V
c
U by (4.3.7).
Then p-’(V) is an analytic subset o f G\p-l(U\V). Let K c p-’(V) be a compact subset. Then
where $KIA denotes the 2-convex hull o f p(K). is a compact subset h
o f P - ~ ( V ) ,since p is a homeomorphism and V is A-convex. Let
x
L
p-’(V)\L.
then p(x)
E
M(A)\p(KIA. i.e. we find
? ^A 6
so that
It follows that
{y since
? op
E
L
p - l ( ~ ) ; ig(y)i
11g11,
for a l l g
6
H ~ I ( ~ - ’ ( v ) ) Ic L.
H o I ( ~ - ~ ( V ) So ) . p-’(V) is holomorphically convex, hence
Stein, since the coordinate functions separate the points of p-’(V). Thus we can w.1.o.g. assume In the definition above that Y is a Stein analytic subset and that U is a hemicompact, relatively compact and A
A-convex subset. (11.1.3) We need a r e s u l t of Rossi [ROI],
which can be stated in the
following form: Theorem. Let X be a reduced complex space, and l e t (A.X) be a uFalgebra such that X is A-morphically convex (cf. (4.3.2)) and A is a subalgebra of Hol(X). Then M(A) can be given the structure of a Stein space such that
^A
= Hol(M(A)).
Stein algebras
61.
(11.1.4) Theorem [KRA
199
Let A be a uF-algebra. Then the following
statements are equivalent: i) A i s a Stein algebra; ii)
2 has analytic structure
in each point cp
E
MA);
iii) There exists an open cover (Ui)lcI of M(A) consisting o f hemicomh
pact, relatively compact and A-convex subsets such that each algebra
2UI is a Stein algebra.
Proof. i) 4 ill) Let A be a Stein algebra, and l e t T: A -> an isomorphism, X a Stein space. Let cp
E
Hol(X) be
M A ) be an arbitrary point.
Since M(A) is locally compact there exists an open, relatively compact, hemicompact and 2-convex neighbourhood U c M(A) of cp. Then is an open and Hol(X)-convex subset of X, hence a Stein
(T*)-'(U)
space. The map
i s well-defined and defines a topological and algebraical isomorphism. By (2.3.6) and since HoI((T*)-~(U)) is complete we have
iii) +ii) Let cp
E
M(A) be an arbitrary point, and l e t cp
Ui. By defini-
tion there exist a Stein space Xi and a topological algebra homomorphism
We can identify M(Hol(Xi)) with Xi by (2.3.2).By (4.3.4)iii) we can identify
M(2"I
1 with Ui as topological spaces. Thus Ti
*: Xi
->
Ui
defines a homeomorphism. By the definition of a reduced complex space (cf. (2.3.1)) there exist an analytic subset Y in a domain G of some Cn. an open neighbourhood V of (Ti 1-1 (9) in Xi and a homeo-
*
morphism p: Y -> Trap: Y ->
V so that fop Tr(W
c
Hol(Y) for a l l f
E
Hol(XI). Then
200
Chapter 11
is a homeomorphism onto the open neighbourhood TrW) of cp. Let
9 c 2 be an arbitrary
element. Then
~l,;~ Hol(Xi)
by remark (11.1.1).
E
Thus G*T:ep
E
91UI E 2UI and
2 has analytic structure
Hol(Y). i.e.
in cp.
ill -b i) For each cp c M(A) choose an analytic subset Y
9
In a domain
of some Cng, an open neighbourhood U of cp in M(A) and a homeocp U so that ?*p E Hol(Y 1 for a l l ? E 2. By morphism p 1 Y -> c p c p cp cp cp remark (11.1.2) we can assume that each U is a hemicompact and cp h A-convex set. Endow U with the complex structure so that p be9 cp comes a biholomorphic mapping, i.e.
Hol(U ) = (9: Ucp-> cp Then
21" 9 c
Hol(U 1, thus cp
C : gep
2uQ c
cp
c
Hol(Yp)).
Hol(U 1, since Hol(U 1 is complete cp cp
with respect t o the compact open topology. A
h
-morphically convex, since it is A-convex and by (4.3.3).
U9 is A so
(2UQ,U
Up = M 6
1 satisfies the hypothesis of theorem (11.1.3). Hence (cf. (4.3.4)iii)) can be given the structure of a Stein
UP A
space so that A
= Hol(U
cp
,a),where
Hol(Ucp,O) denotes the alge-
bra of a l l holomorphic functions with respect t o this new structure. Claim. These new structures coincide on their intersection. Let cp, $
E
M(A) such that U '
n U,
i 0, and l e t cpo
E
Ucpt l U.,
Let
A
V be an open,hemicompact and A-convex neighbourhood of cpo so
.
U flU Denote by Hol(V) resp. Hol(V) the algebra of c p Q cp 51 a l l holomorphic functions on V with respect to the complex struc-
that V
c
ture which is induced from (U,,O)
resp. (U,,,,O).
Then V is
vex, thus Hol (U ,a)-convex, and the restriction mapping cp Hol(U9,0) -> Hol(V1 has dense range by (2.3.6). So cp
2UP-con-
201
Stein algebras
JI ,a) we
Repeating these arguments for H o l W
A
= A,
A
=
(A
1
uJ,
get
by (4.1.5).
Since po was an arbitrary point o f U
V
f l U
J
,
and since every point of A
M(A) has a neighbourhood consisting of open. hemicompact and Aconvex subsets (cf. (4.3.7)ii)), we get our assertion. Hence we have equipped M(A) with the structure of a complex space so that
2c
Hol(M(A)). Since M(A) is 2-morphically convex we get
our r e s u l t from (11.1.3).
0
(11.1.5) The next example shows that subalgebras of Stein algebras need not be Stein algebras. Example. Set
A = {f Then A
-
Hol(C): f(0) = f(i) f o r all i=1,2D...1.
as a closed subalgebra of the Stein algebra Hol(C)
- is a
uF-algebra. Set po: A ->
then po
c
C . f ->
f(0).
M(A).
Claim. M(A) = C\{1,2 i) For each x c C\{1,2,
,...1 as
sets.
...1 the evaluation homomorphism at x
an element of M A ) . I f x, y o C\{1,2,
defines
...1 are distinct points there is
f o A, by the theorem of Weierstra6. such that f(x) 4 f(y). 1.e. C\{1,2,
...1 c
MA).
ii) Let p 4 po be an arbitrary element of M(A). We show that p can
be extended t o an element of M(Hol(C)). Choose f c A such that p ( f - f ( O ) )
= 1 and define
202
Chapter 11
Then
7 is well-defined,
g(f-f(O)) c A. Let g, h
since f(i) = f(0) f or i=1,2,...,
E
1.e.
Hol(C) be arbitrary elements, then
g(gh) = p(gh(f-f(O)l) = p(gh(f-f(O)))p(f-f(O))
= p(gh(f-f(0)I2) = c9(g(f-f(O)))cp(h(f-f(O)))
= g(g)F(h).
defines an algebra homomorphism. Moreover +lA=cp.
It follows that
Since p is continuous there is a compact set K c 4: such that for a l l h
A,
ip (h )i
llhll,,
ig(g)i
~ ~ g ~ ~ K ~ ~ f -for f ( 0a)l~l lgKE, Hol(C),
E
hence
so
x
E
M(Hol(C)), 1.e.
c
3 is
the evaluation homomorphism at a point
+ 0.1, ... , since p t po, and our claim is proved.
C. We have x
Claim. po has no compact neighbourhood, hence A is not a Stein al gebra. ill) For n c N set Kn = (1x1
g
(II.IIK n1n generate
nl. The seminorms
topology of A. hence
?i ,
= {cp
E
M(A):itp(f)i s IlfllKn for all f
E
A), na No
is an admissible exhaustion of M(A) by (3.2.6)(*), Let x
c
C\{O,l,
(3.2.8). ry
...1, ixl>n. We claim that
x is not contained in Kn.
To prove this choose h c Hol(C), such that {y c C: h(y) = 01 = {O,l 1.
...
Choose k c N. so that (ixl/n l k > llhll Then g = zk- h
E
Kn
/ih(x)i.
A and ig(x)i > llgllKn.
iv) Now suppose that po has a compact neighbourhood K
Choose n
E
N. so that K
U = {p
c
MA).
.u
c
Kn and choose fl.....fr
c
A so that ry
E
M(A): ip(fi)-po(fi)i < 1, i=l,,.,,rl c K n
(cf. (3.2.2)i)). Since a l l fl are continuous functions on the plane and fi(0) = f,(]) for j=1,2
,... , we find x
E
C\{1.2
,...1, Ixi>n, so
that
the
Stein algebras
203
N
x
E
U, i.e. x
E
K n , and we get a contradiction t o ill).
(11.1.6) Using (11.1.3) we get a criterion when a subalgebra of a Stein algebra is i t s e l f a Stein algebra. Lemma. Let X be a Stein space, and l e t (A,X) be a closed subalgebra of Hol(X) such that the adjoint spectral map o f the inclusion homomorphism I: A -->
Hol(X). f ->
f, is a proper mapping. Then A is
a Stein algebra. Proof. By (2.3.2) the structure map
j: X ->
M(Hol(X)), x ->
qx,
where q x ( f ) = f ( x ) for a l l f s Hol(X), i s a homeomorphism. It follows that i * o j : X ->
M(A)
is a proper mapping. Let x
E
X. Then
i*oj(x)(f) = f ( x ) f o r a l l f e A.
i.e. the structure map
j,: X ->
M(A). x ->
9,.
is a proper mapping, hence X is A-morphically convex by (4.3.5) and our assertion follows from (11.1.3).
0
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
205
CHAPTER 12 CHARACTERIZING SOME PARTICULAR STEIN ALGEBRAS
We s t a r t with a function algebraic characterization o f Hol(G) in the case that G is
- an
open subset of the plane,
- a polynomially convex open subset o f -
Cn.
a logarithmically convex complete Reinhardt domain, a domain o f holomorphy in some Cn.
(12.1) Polynomial Iy convex analytic subsets (12.1.1) Many results of this chapter are based on the following theorem, which has been used in a similar form by various authors. Theorem. Let A be a rationally n-generated resp. n-generated semisimple F-algebra with generating elements fl.
...,fn.
Suppose that
the map
is a homeomorphism onto an open subset G
c
Cn. Then G is a ration-
ally convex resp. polynomially convex open subset and A i s topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol (GI. Proof. Recall that a subset S
c
Cn is called rationally convex resp.
polynomially convex if the rationally convex h u l l resp. the polynomially convex h u l l of each compact subset o f S is contained in S. Since
P is a homeomorphism,
G is rationally resp. polynomially con-
206
Chapter 12
vex by (5.2.4111 resp. (5.1.5). Denote by 8 the (unique) continuous homomorphism 8 : Hol(G) ->
A
such that I) 8(z1) = fl
, i=1, ...,n.
ii) k h ) = h o f for a l l h
E
Hol(G1,
where &h) denotes the Gelfand transform of 8(h) (cf. (6.1.2)). We see that 8 i s injective by ill. If we can show that 8 is surjective, our assertion w i l l follow from the open mapping theorem for Fr6chet spaces. Let g c A be an arbitrary element. Since A is rationally n-generated there exist polynomials pk, qk (k
E
N) so that qk(fl#".mfn) is inver-
tible in A and gk = Pk(fl,".#f,)/qk(fl"...f,) k ->
converges t o g as
Q).It follows from (6.1.4) that Gk(fl#..#,fn)
transform of qk(f1,' ..,fn)
-
the Gelfand
- has no zero on M(A). so Gk(fl,..'.f,)oe-l
has no zero on G. 1.e.
&OF-' Hol(G) for a l l k N, in fact a k o F - l is a rational function which is analytic on G. BY (3.2.12) $k converges t o 8, hence converges compactly t o t o e - 1 on G, since f is a homeomorphism. So :OF-' Hol(G) by (2.1.7). Set h = OF-^, then &h) = 3 by ii). Hence 8(h) = g, since A E
E
Bkof-'
E
is semisimple and we have proved that 8 is surjective.
0
(12.1.2) Corollary. Let A be a rationally n-generated semisimple Falgebra with generating elements fll....fn.
A
Suppose that the map F
defines a homeomorphism onto an analytic subset of a domain of holomorphy G c Cn. Then A i s topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol(X). Proof. a) Denote by 8 the continuous homomorphism from Hol(G) to
A such that
207
Characterization of Stein algebras
Let g
E
Hol(X). Choose h
-*
A. g
8,: Hol(X) ->
We show that 8,
Hol(G) so that hl,
E
= g by (2.3.3) and set
8(h).
is well-defined. Let h
E
Hol(G) so that hlx
BI
0.
Then &h) = h o e = 0 by ii), hence 8(h) = 0, since A i s semisimple. It follows that 8,(g). extension h
E
g
E
Hoi(X), is independent of the choice of the
Hol(G). Moreover we see that 8,
is an injective algebra
homomorphism. Let g
E
A be an arbitrary element. Repeating the proof of (12.1.1) we
get a sequence of rational functions ( r k ) k . analytic on X, such that
rk converges compactly on k
E
N, we have h
x
to h =
6oP-l.
Since rk
E
H ~ I ( X ) for all
Hol(X). since Hol(X) is complete with respect to
E
the compact open topology. Moreover 8,(h) 1.e. 8,(h)
= hop =
6,
= g since A is assumed to be semisimple. Hence 8, is an
algebra isomorphism. Consider the map
8: A Then
8
"-1 9.F A
Hol(X), g ->
->
.
is well-defined by a), and it is easily seen
hypothesis "semisimple" - that
r: A ->
h
8
-
using ill and the
= 8;'. The map
A
f ,
A. f ->
Is continuous by (3.2.12) and the map T:
3 ->
is continuous since
Hol(X),
6
->
"-1 goF ,
A
? is a homeomorphism.
Hence
8
= T o r is contin-
uous, and A is topologically isomorphic t o Hol(X) by the open mapping theorem.
0
208
Chapter 12
(12.1.3) Corollary. Let A be an n-generated uF-algebra with generating elements fl,...,fn.
Suppose that
an analytic subset X of a domain G
c
? is
a homeomorphism onto
Cn, then A Is topologically and
algebraically isomorphic t o Hol ( X I . Proof. Recall f i r s t that A is isomorphic t o
2. Since P is a homeo-
morphism we see that X is polynomially convex (cf. (5.1.8)). Using similar arguments as above we show that A n "-1 T: ^A -> Hol(X), f -> f*F , defines an injective and continuous algebra homomorphism. We show that T is surjective. Let f
E
Hol(X) be an arbitrary element. We shall show that there is
a sequence of polynomials (Pk)k so 'that pk converges compactly t o f. Then Pk'P converges t o an element
t e ^A , since
A
A is complete. and
T ( t ) = f. Now l e t K
c
X be a polynomially convex compact subset. Choose an
open relatively compact subset U
c
G which contains K, and a closed
polycylinder P which contains U. For each x
E
P\U we find a poly-
such that ipx(x)l > 1 > ilpxllK. By the compactness of P\U
nomial p,
we find polynomials pl,...,pr
K
c
Q = {x
E
such that
P: Ipl(x)l < 1, i=l
,...,r).
and Q c U. Hence Q flX is an analytic subset of the polynomially convex open set Q. Extend
fl,
Q (cf. (2.3.3)).
r" -
By (1.4.5)
to a holomorphic function
and hence f
-
r"
on
can be approximated
uniformly on K by polynomials.
0
(12.2) Polynomiall y convex open subsets of Cn (12.2.1) Let G c 4: be a polynomially convex open subset. Then Hol(G) i s a singly generated uF-algebra with generating element
Polynomial ly convex open subsets
209
by (5.1.2)i). The map
D: Hol(G) ->
Hol(G), f ->
f',
where f' denotes the derivative of f, defines a derivation on Hol(G) (cf. (8.2)) such that D(z) = 1 is invertible in Hol(G). Our f i r s t theorem
-
due t o Carpenter [CAR 6 1
-
shows that these
properties characterize in fact the algebra Hol(G). G
c
4: a poly-
nomially convex open set. Theorem [CAR 61. Let A be a singly generated uF-algebra with generating element f. Suppose there is a derivation D: A ->
A such
that D(f) is invertible in A. Then ?(M(A)) is a polynomially convex open subset of the plane and A is topologically and algebraically isomorphic to Hol (?(M(A)). Proof. By (5.1.8) it suffices t o consider the algebra A = /&P(Kn), where
... c
Kn
c
Kn+l
c
... is a sequence
of polynomially convex com-
pact subsets of the plane. Recall from (5.1.6) that (KnIn is an admissible exhaustion of M(A). Moreover A is singly generated by the polynomial z: U K n --+
C,
x. By our hypothesis there exists a derivation D on A so that
x ->
D(z) Is Invertible in A, 1.e. fi(z1, the Gelfand transform of D(z), has no zero on U K n = M(A) by (6.1.4).
By (5.1.4) that
2
2
i s an injective and continuous mapping. We want to show
is an open mapping, i.e.
2
is a homeomorphism.
Suppose the contrary. Let U be an open subset of M(A) (Gelfand topology) such that P(U) = U is not an open subset of the plane. Let y be a boundary point of ?(U) such that y
Q
s(U). W.1.o.g. y
E
Since D is continuous by (8.2.3). and since A is topologically and A
algebraically isomorphic to A there is I s N and c>O such that
K,.
210
Chapter 12
where $(f) denotes the Gelfand transform of D(f), hence
(*I
i$(f)(y)i
I;
CII?I,~
Since d is continuous by derivation on ^A
KI
fo r a l l
(0)
n ?E
A.
it can be extended t o a continuous point
= P(K,) at y (cf. (1.3.14)). The point y i s a boundary
point of KI (euclidean topology) since on KI the (relative) Gelfand topology and the euclidean topology coincide by (5.1.7)ii). Hence d
=0
by (1.3.14). This is a contradiction, since
= $(z)(y).
d(?l,l) and
6(z)
has no zero on UK,.
Our assertion follows from (12.1.1).
a
(12.2.2) Remarks. i) Theorem (12.2.1) becomes false if we replace "uF-algebra"
by "semisimple F-al gebra".
The algebra C"([O,l])
is a semisimple F-algebra by (8.1.3)ii). It is
singly generated by the map
z: [0,13 ->
c, x
->
_*
C"([O,l]),
x.
(cf. (5.1 .2)iIi)), and D: C"([O,l])
f ->
f',
where f' denotes the derivative of f, is a derivation on C"C[O,l]). Clearly D(z) is invertible in C"([O.l]). 11) We can sharpen theorem (12.2.1) in the following way (see
[CAR
61): Let A
xl, ...,xn
c
be a uF-algebra. Suppose there are f
C and a derivation D: A
-*
A such that
E
A,
211
Polynomial ly convex open subsets
ad f-xi.l i s invertible in A for i=l,...,n, 8) The polynomials in f. (f-xl~l)-l,...s(f-xn.l)
-1 are dense
in A, y) D(f) is invertible in A.
Then ?(M(A)) is a finitely connected open set in C and A is algebraical ly and topologically isomorphic to Hot (?(M(A))). The proof of this theorem runs along the lines of the proof of (12.2.11,
using the fact, that for each 2-convex compact subset K o f
M(A) our assumptions imply that every boundary point of
?(K)
is a
peak point f o r R(?(K)). In general it is false that each boundary point of a compact subset
K
c
C is a peak point for the algebra R(K). Hence we cannot copy the
proof of (12.2.1) for rationally singly generated uF-algebras. and it is unknown whether an analogous result holds f o r these algebras. (12.2.3) Let G
c
Cn be a polynomlally convex open subset. Then
Hol(G) is n-generated by the coordinate functions zl,...,zn
2:
M(Hol(G1) ->
Cn,
(Q
->
and
A
(21(p)....,zn('pl),
is a homeomorphism onto G by example (5.1.7). Hence Hol(G) is a n-generated semisimple F-algebra and M(Ho1(GI)is a 2n-dimensional topol ogicai manifold
.
We use this l a s t observation for a function algebralc characterization of Hol(G), G as above.
Theorem [H/W].
Let A be an n-generated semisimple F-algebra with
generating elements fl,...,fn. h
F : M(A) ->
Cn,
(Q
Let ->
A
(fl(9)
....,fn(p)). A
Suppose that M(A) i s a topological 2n-dimensional manifold (without boundary), then %A(A))
is a polynomially convex open subset of Cn
and A is topologically and algebraical l y isomorphic to Hot @(M(A))).
212
Chapter 12
Proof.? is an injective and continuous map by (5.1.4). If we can show that
P is an open mapping, hence a homeomorphism, our assertion
w i l l follow from theorem (12.1.1). Let V be an arbitrary open subset o f M(A). Let cp c V. Choose a chart (U,h,W) around cp (1.e. U is an open neighbourhood of cp, W is an open subset of R2n and h: W ->
-
that U c V and Since
PIC
U is a homeomorphism) such
-
the closure of U
is a compact subset of M(A).
is a homeomorphism we see that
from W onto the subset h U )
c
P o
h is a homeomorphism
Cn = R2n. By Brouwer's domain of in-
variance theorem (cf. [DUG]) f ( U ) is an open subset of Cn. Hence
P
is an open mapping. (12.2.4) Corollary [H/W]. ted by f,....,f,.
Let A be a semisimple F-algebra genera-
Suppose that M(A) i s a topological 2n-dimensional
manifold (without boundary) such that for each c>O the set
K, = {cp c M(A):
ifi(cp)i
C,
i=i,...,n}
is compact in M A ) . Then A i s topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol(Cn). Proof. By (12.2.3) f?(M(A)) is an open subset of Cn and A is topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol(P(M(A))). We show that
P(M(A)) is a closed subset of Cn. Then FS(M(A)) = 41" and we are done. Let (Xk)k be a sequence in
P(M(A)) which
converges to y . Choose c > o
so that
{y,x1,x2
,...I
c
{(w,
,...,wn) c c": IW,IO, i=1, ...,n).
I f t=(tl
,....t n1
E
Cn. r=(rl,...,rn) E R:.
D ~ = ,{(w, ~
,...,wn) c c":
define
< r i, i=1,...,n).
Iwi-tii
Let A be an F-algebra and l e t D1.....Dn be derivations on A (cf. n (8.2)). I f v = (vl ,...,v), c No and f E A set
--
D V ( f ) = Dno ...a Dno
...a
D,o
vn- tlmes
...o
Dl(f),
vl- tlmes
D0( f ) = f for 0 = (0. ....0). Theorem. Let A be a semisimple F-algebra with connected spectrum
M(A), and l e t (p,),
be a defining sequence of seminorms for A (cf.
(3.1.7)). Suppose there are elements f,
.....fn c A and derivations
D1, ....Dn on A such that I)
P:M(A) ->
c". cp ->
A
(fl(cp)
....,f n ( p ) ) , i s an injective A
map. ii) D ( f 1 = 6 .1, for i,j=l, ...,n, where 6 denotes the Kronecker 1 j ii 11 symbol,
ill) there is a sequence r1,r2,... in R: such that
pk(DV(f))
pk+l(f)vl/ri
for a l l f
A. k
t
N. v
c
Po.
Then G = f(M( A ) ) is a domain of holomorphy In Cn and A is topological l y and algebraical ly isomorphic to Hol (GI.
216
Chapter 12
Proof. As usual denote by Ak the completion of the algebra A/{pk=O) wlth respect to the norm p i (g+{pk=o)) = pk(g). By (3.2.8) (M(Ak))k is an admlsslble exhaustion of M A ) . a ) Claim. t(M(Ak))
f?(M(Ak+l))
1s contained in int P(M(Ak+l))
- for each k
E
-
the interior of
N.
Let 'k = (r\k),...,r~k)). Choose an arbitrary t=(tl,...,tn) Let g
c
E
D,~.
A be an arbltrary element. Then
by Ill). It follows that
defines an element In Ak, and that the series converges In any order of summatlon. We note that
is a llnear map, slnce a l l Di are linear maps. I n fact rule
- we see that Tt
-
using Lelbniz'
Is even an algebra homomorphism. This homo-
morphism Is continuous by (*), hence can be extended to Ak+l. denote this map again by Tt. We remark that
(**I Tt(fi + {pk+l'o))
' fi
by 11) and since D (1)=0 (j=l
I
+ ti'l + {pk'o)
,...,n).
Conslder the spectral map T:
M(Ak) ->
M(Ak+l),
cf. (3.2.5). By (**I we have for cp A
fl(T:(p))
= cp(f,) + ti,
E
M(Ak)
for 11' .
...,n,
We
Domains of holomorphy
217
and our claim is proved.
B) Since
h
F I M ( A ~ )is
from a) that
a homeomorphism for each k
f: M(A) ->
P
N. we learn
G is a homeomorphism onto an open sub-
set G c Cn. Since M(A) is connected the same is true for G.
8
y) Claim.
W.1.o.g. 0
c 1-101 (GIfo r a! I g E A.
o f - '
P
G. Let po
A
P
M(A) such that F(cpo) = 0, w.1.o.g.
po P M(A1).
Let t
E
Do,rl
be an arbitrary point and define Tt: A2 ->
A1 as in a).
Then
P-'(t) = T:(cpo) by (***I,
so we have for g
E
A
8tP-'(t)) = G(T:(cpo))
=
c
= Po( Dv(g)tv/vl + tpl=O)) v EN:
aoe-ll
i.e.
show that x
Do.rl
E
=
cpo(DV(g))tV/v!, V E N ~
Hol(D 1 by (2.1.5). In the same way we can o,rl
8 0 f - l is holomorphic in
a neighbourhood of any point
G and our claim is proved.
I
8 ) Denote by 8 the continuous homomorphism from Hol(G) t o A such that i)8(zi)=fi fo r i=l,
....n.
and ii) &h) = h o p for a l l h
E
Hol(G).
cf. (6.1.21. Let 8(h) = 0. Then 0 = &h) = hoe, hence h is injective. Now l e t g
P
A be an arbitrary element. Then
0. i.e. 8
Chapter 12
218
a mP-l c Hol(G) by y ) , hence 8(amP-') = a. where &a *?-'I denotes the Gelfand transform of 8 ( $m f - l ) .
and it
follows that 8($*P-') = g since A is semisimple, i.e. 8 is surjective. So 8 is a topological isomorphism by the open mapping theorem. 6)
Let x c G\P(M(Ak)) be an arbitrary point. Then cp = P - l ( x ) c M(A)\M(Ak).
By (3.2.6)(*) M(Ak) = {Cp
0
M(A)' icp(f)i
Pk(f) for a l l f
6
A).
Hence there Is g c A so that
The last inequality follows by (1.2.3). So
A
for the holomorphic function h = gap-'.
convex, since
Hence G is holomorphically
( P ( M ( A ~is) )an~ admissible exhaustion of G,
is a domain of holomorphy by (2.2.7).
thus G 0
(12.4.2) Remarks. I) Theorem (12.4.1) is based on an idea of Arens [ARE 13 who considered rationally singly generated (semisimple) Falgebras which satisfy hypothesis ii) and 111). ill Let
G
c
Cn be a domain of holomorphy. Denote by zl,...,zn
the co-
ordinate functions. By (2.2.7) we can identify G and M(Hol(G)), hence
2:
M(Hol(G)) ->
@"*
~p
->
A
(41(9),*..szn(cp)),
is injective. Set for i=l ,...*n DI: Hol(G) ->
Hol(G), f ->
df .
dzi
Then D1,...*D,
are derivations on Hol(G) which satisfy ii) and ill) (cf.
Reinhardll domains
219
(2.1.4)). Hence theorem (12.4.1) characterizes Hol (GI. G a domain o f holomorphy among the semisimple F-algebras. (12.5) Logarithmical l y convex complete Reinhardt domains (12.5.1) Finally we consider F-algebras A which have a special basis. We say that flD....fn generate a basis in A. provided each g
E
A has
a unique representation g = c (v,
....,v n
E
aq..
'1 'n f 1 ...-fn , n
-
n 'v1.....v )€No
C f o r a l l (vl,...,vn)
E
No. n
...v n
This means that the series converges with respect to a fixed order o f summation in the topology of A. We use the notation
g =
C
a? ,.
Theorem [S/W].
fl.....fn.
Let A be an F-algebra with basis generated by
Suppose that
G=
{(?l(cp)D...D?n(cp))
E
is an open subset of Cn. Then
Cn: cp
E
M(A))
G is a logarithmically convex complete
Reinhardt domain (cf. example (2.2.7)ii)) and A i s topologically and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol (GI. Proof. We f i r s t note that A is n-generated by f,,...,f,
in the usual
sense (cf. (5.1.1)). So
f: M(A) ->
Cn, cp ->
A
(fl(p)
.....fn(cp)). A
i s an injective and continuous map by (5.1.4). We claim that Let g =
P is a homeomorphism and that A is semisimple.
c avfv be an arbitrary element of A.
such that i t i l > O (i=l ,...,n) Then
and set it1 = (itll
Let t = (tl....,tn)
r
G
....,itnl). Let cp = C-'(t).
220
Chapter 12
G oP-'(t)
= c p ( ~a v f v ) =
c avtv. C
It follows from (2.1.5) that the series
function on the polycylinder Do,ltl
8 oP-l(x) Hence
=
c avxv
avzv defines a holomorphic
Moreover
for a I x
c
DOlltlnG.
Z avzv
hgM =
defines a holomorphic function on m
G = ((zl,
...,zn)
E
C?: There exists (tl,...,tn)
c
G so that
izll < ltil for i=l ,...,nl,
and
Note that
G" is a complete Reinhardt domain.
Now choose an arbitrary element g g =
c
rad A, i.e.
Gm
0 by (8.1.2). Let
C avfv. Then
for a l l v c t$ Let U
c
h = 0 by the identity theorem (2.1.6). Hence av=O 9 and g = 0. Thus A is semisimple.
M(A) be an open subset, and l e t cp
ment, Set zo =
P(cp1. Choose gl,...,gr
W = (J,
E
c
c
U be an arbitrary ele-
A such that
...
M(A): iGi(J,)-~i(tp)i < 1, i=l, ,rI
c
U,
cf. (3.2.2111. Then
P(w) = {z E G: i ~ ~ O f ? - I z ) - ~ ~ F -< ~I.( zi=l. ~ ).... i r). Hence P(W) is an open subset of G. since
GloP-'
E
Hol(G) for i=l,...,r.
So P is an open mapping, hence a homeomorphism. I t follows from (12.1.1) that G is polynomially convex and that A is
topologically and algebraically isomorphic to Hoi (GI. We see from the proof of (12.1.1) that the map A ->
HoI(G), g ->
GoF-'.
defines a topological algebra isomorphism. By the proof above each element
of Hol(G) can be extended to a holomorphic function
Reinhardt domains
221
G.
h on Since G is polynomially convex this implies that G = GS 9 hence G is a logarithmically convex complete Reinhardt domain (cf. example (2.2.7) ii)1.
0
(12.5.2) Remarks. i) There are B-algebras A with a basis generated by n elements ( see [S/Wl). In this case G = {(?,(cp)
.....f,(cp)) A
c
Cn: cp
E
M(A1)
is of course not an open subset. Hence we cannot drop the hypothesis "G is open" in (12.5.1). ill Let G c Cn be a logarithmically convex complete Reinhardt domain.
The coordinate functions zls...,zn
generate a basis for Hol(G) by ex-
ample (2.2.7)ii). Since G i s a domain of holomorphy we can natur a l l y identify M(Hol(G)) and G by (2.2.7). Hence A
{($,(cp)*...*zn(cp)): cp
c
M(Hol(G))) = G
is an open subset o f Cn. So (12.5.1) is again a characterization theorem.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
223
CHAPTER 13 LIOUVILLE ALGEBRAS
(13.1) Liouville algebras Liouvllle's theorem f o r entire functions s-ates tha each bounded function f
E
Hol(C) is constant. Since we can naturally identify
M(Hol(C)) and C (cf. (4.1.7)ii)) resp.
Hol(C) and Hol(C)^. the alge-
bra of a l l Gelfand transforms, we can rephrase Liouville's theorem in the following way: If f
E
Hol(C) is an element so that ?(M(Hol(C))
is a bounded subset of C , then f must be a scalar multiple of 1 c Hol(C). The l a s t formulation motivates the following definition. (13.1.1) Definition. An F-algebra A is called Liouville algebra if a
f(M(A)) Is an unbounded subset of C f o r each element f cA\{c-l:crCl. (13.1.2) Remarks. i) Note that C((xl), the algebra of a l l (continuous) complex-valued functions on a point x i s a Liouville algebra. ii) A nontrivial Liouville algebra was constructed in example (9.2.2).
iii) Each Liouville algebra is automatically semisimple, 1.e. the map
A ->
A
A, f ->
an element g
?,
i s injective (cf. (8.1.2)). Otherwise there would be
* 0 in A such that G(M(A)) = ( 0 ) . but g c A\{c.l:
c c Cl.
i v ) Using Shilov's idempotent theorem (6.1.5) one sees that the spec-
trum o f each Liouville algebra is connected. v) Let A be a Liouville algebra, f
G
A\{c.l: c
c
Cl.
Suppose that C\?(M(A)) contains an open disc { z : I z - z o l < e l . Then f-zo.l is invertible by (6.1.4). We have l/(f-z;l) since the same is true for f. but
c
A\{c.l: c r C l
224
Chapter 13
l/d,
(l/(f-zo-l))n(M(A)) c {z: i z i
where (l/(f-zo-l))n denotes the Gelfand transform of l / ( f - z o - l ) ,
and
we get a contradiction. It follows that ?(M(A)) is a dense subset of C.
(13.1.3) We can give a more detailed description of the spectrum of an unbounded element o f a Liouville algebra. Proposition [DAL]. Let A be a Liouville algebra, f
t
A\{c.l: c c C ) .
Then C\f(M(A)) contains no closed connected subsets other than single points. Proof. Let K be a closed connected subset of C which is contained in c\?(M(A)). i) Assume that K is unbounded.
Consider K as a subset of S, the extended plane, and set U= S
\ (K U
{a)).U is an open subset of the plane. U is connected.
since f(M(A)) is a dense subset o f U by (13.1.2)~) and since i?(M(A))
Is connected by (13.1.2)iv). S\U = K U {a)is connected, hence U is a simply connected domain of the plane (cf. [NAR l],p.
151). Since K
there exists a biholomorphic map g
E
*
0 we have U
* C . hence
Hol(U) which maps U onto the
open unit disc D by the Riemann mapping theorem. Denote by 8 the continuous homomorphism from Hol(U) to A such that 8 ( z ) = f and 8(h)^ = ha? for a l l h
E
Hol(U), cf. (6.1.2). Then 8 ( g )
8(g)^(M(A)) = goi?(M(A))
c
1.e. @(g)^(M(A)) is bounded but B(g)
E
A,
Do A\{c.l: c
t
C), since
B(g)^(M(A)) is a dense subset of D. Hence we get a contradiction. ill Assume that K is bounded.
Let x c K. Consider the map
225
Liouville algebras
Then h is a homeomorphism, thus h(K) is a connected compact sub-
s. Note
set of
there is y
E
that h ( K ) \ t 4 is a closed subset of C. Suppose that
K \ t x } . Let L be the component of h(K)\tm) which con-
tains h(y). Then L is unbounded, since otherwise L would be a component of h(K) such that L 9 h(K). Now we get a contradiction as in I), replacing f by l / ( f - x - l ) . and K by L.
0
(13.1.4) Let G
c
U! be a polynomially convex domain, i.e. G is a
simply connected domain by (1.2.4)ii). If G 9 4: then there exists a biholomorphic map from G onto the unit disc D by the Riemann mapping theorem. This shows in particular that the Liouville property characterizes Hol (4:) among the algebras Hol (GI.G a polynomial ly convex domain of the plane. These algebras are singly generated nontrivial uF-algebras and one i s inclined to ask whether Hol(C) is characterized by the Liouville
property among the singly generated nontrivial uF-algebras. The next example shows that this is not the case. (13.1.5) Example [B/L].
We construct a singly generated nontrivial
Liouville algebra A, which is not isomorphic to Hol(C). For z
c
U! denote by Re z resp. I m z the real resp. imaginary part o f
z. For n
c
N set = tz
E
C : -n s Re z c n. -n c I m z
En = t z
E
41: I m z > 0. l / ( n + l ) < Re z < l / n )
Ln
S
n),
and
Each Kn is a polynomialiy convex compact set, since C\Kn is connected, cf. (1.2.4)ii). Set A = & L P ( K n ) , then A i s a singly generated uF-algebra.
Chapter 13
226
1
..... . . . . . . .
By (5.1.6) M(A) = U K n = C as sets and (Knln is an admissible exhaustion of M(A) with respect to the Gelfand topology. Note that
(Kn),,
i s not an admissible exhaustion of C with respect t o the eu-
clidean topology, since f o r example the set {z: OrRe zrl, I m z=1) i s not contained in any Kn. I n the same way as In example (5.1.12)we can show that M(A) i s not locally compact. More precisely, no point of the set
(2:
O=Re z, I m z a 0 ) has a compact neighbourhood (Gel-
fand topology). Hence A is not a Stein algebra (cf. (11.1.1)).
in par-
ticular A is not isomorphic t o Hol(C). Claim. A is a Liouville algebra. Let f c A be an arbitrary element. Interpret ? a s a complex-valued function on C which can be approximated uniformly on every Kn by polynomials, c f . (5.1.7)i). Then
?lC\l. We give an example of a doubly generated Liouville algebra A with locally compact spectrum, which has an empty Shilov boundary but which is not a Stein algebra. Since this example is a slight modification of example (9.2.2) we omit most of the proofs of the assertions. Define the following sets in C 2
229
Liouville algebras
x1 = {lIXC. x2 = CX{O). Xn = {l-l/n)xC for n>2, x = u xn. nkl
KI = X f l U z l 4 , i w i 4 I for 1
N.
E
Each KI is a polynomially convex compact set. So A =
c. w->
?(t.w)
is a holomorphic function for every t a R. Hence (s,M(A)) is a m.m.a.. iii) Let A be an F-algebra and denote by yA the Shilov boundary o f A
(cf. (9.1)). Then (s,M(A)) is a m.m.a.(+) yA
by (9.1.7)i) and (9.1.6) if
+ 0.
iv) It follows from Rossi's maximum principle (1.4.9) that
(e,M(B)\yB) is a m.m.a.(*)
for each B-algebra B.
v) We shortly sketch an example due t o Wermer [WER 11. We shall
use it to show that there exists a m.m.a. (A,X) such that X does not admit analytic structure, in fact X does not even contain an analytic disc. (We say that X contains an analytic disc if there are a disc D in the plane and a nonconstant continuous function f: D -> that gof
E
X so
Hol(D) f o r a l l g a A.)
We denote by al.a2,
... the points in the disc {Izl
< 1/21 with rational
real and imaginary part. For each j a N denote by B the algebraic j function
Bj(z) = (z-al)(z-a2)
...(2-a i -1-1
1
and set
where cl,
...,ci
are positive constants. Denote by
C(Cl,...,cn)
the sub-
set of the Riemann surface of gn which lies in t i x l ~ l / 2 1 , i.e. C(C1*
...,c n1 = t(2.W)'
where w(")(z). j=1.....2n
i
l Z i ~ l / 2 ,w=w(")(z), j=l, j
...*2")
are the values of gn a t z.
For a sequence of positive numbers (cnIn define X(cn) to be the set of a l l points ( 2 . ~ 1E C2 such that i) I z l s 112 and
ii) there is a sequence (z.wn) c C(c l....cn)
such that
Chapter 14
234
wn --+ w as n---> QD. It was proved by Wermer that there exists a sequence (cn),,
of pos-
itive constants so that a ) X = X(cn) is a polynomially convex compact set in 4:2 which contains no analytic disc,
C) X is the poiynomially convex h u l l of the compact set Y =
x n {(z,w):
i z i = 1/21.
y) zl(X) = {lzlSl/21, where z1 denotes the f i r s t coordinate
function.
For la te r use we remark that
8 ) C(c l.....cn) X
n ({al)xC)
fl({allxC) = {(al,O)l for a l l n e N. hence
= {(al,O))
by the construction.
We now use Wermer's example to construct a m.m.a..
Kn = X
n {(z,w):
izl
For n> 2 set
(1/2)-(1/n)1.
Each K n is a polynomially convex compact subset of C2. since the same is true fo r X. Note that Kn is not empty by y ) . Set A =
log IIgIIf-l(A),
R U {-a),X ->
is a subharmonic function for each g
Q
A.
(Note that f-l(dD(X0)) and f - l ( X ) are compact subsets of X by i).) Proof. a) By I) X is a locally compact space. Hence
zg: u ->
R, 1->
l l g i f- 1 ( ~ )D
is upper semi-continuous by (14.2.1) and the same is true for log Z fl)Let D c U be a closed disc centered at A,.
f"(D)
Fix xo
Q
f-'(X0).
is a compact subset of X we see that log Z
9' Since
is bounded from 9 above on D, hence we can find a sequence of continuous functions (uI), on D such that uls log Z
9
, i.e. u1
2
u2
2...2
jog Z
9
and
Maximum modulus algebras un(x) -> each k
E
239
log Z (XI as n -> Q) for each x c D, cf. appendix A.2. For 9 N choose a polynomial pk such that IRe(pk)-ukl < l / k On dD.
The choice o f pk i s possible by A S . Then
(*I Fix k
log E
z9
s Re(Pk) + l / k on dD.
N. Let (qnIn be a sequence of polynomials which converges
uniformly on D to exp(-pk-l/k).
Since g.qn(f) z A there is yncf-'(dl))
so that
Ig(xo)qn(f(xo))l s Ig(yn)qn(f(yn))l by hypothesis 11). Hence we find Xk Ig(Xo)eXp(-(pk(f)(Xo)+l/k))l
E
f-l(dD) such that
s Ig(xk)exp(-(Pk(f)(xk)+l/k))l.
we get
For the equality cf. A.4. For k -> log Z ( X 1 9 0
5
1/2n
I
dD
(log Z ) ( t ) d t . 9
Since this inequality holds for each closed disc D subharmonic on U by A.7.
c
U. log 2
9
is 0
240
Chapter 14
(14.2.3)Corollary.
Let (A,X) be a m.m.a.(*)
resp. a m.m.a.. Suppose
there are an open subset U c C and an element f
f: X ->
U is a surjective and proper mapping. Then log Z
9
RU
U ->
I
{--),
X ->
is a subharmonic function for each g
E
log IIgIIf-l(X), A.
Proof. Let D c U be a closed disc centered at A,,
xo c f-'(A0). df-l(D)
A so that
E
E
and l e t
Then f-l(D) c X i s a compact neighbourhood of xo and
f - b D ) . Hence we have ig(xo)l
llglldf-1(D)
* llgllf-1(dD)
for every g c A by the definition of a m.m.a.(*),
and our assertion
.follows from (14.2.2).
0
Remark.This theorem was also obtained by Senichkin [SEN 11. (14.2.4) We give a f i r s t application o f this theorem. Definition. Let U c C be an open set. A subset E set if there exists a subharmonic function p E c {Z
I
U:
P(Z)
*
--a0
U is called polar
c
on U such that
= -=I.
We remark that a polar set has Lebesgue measure zero ( cf. A.14 1, in particular an open subset W
c
U is not a polar set. We are now
able to prove an identity theorem for maximum modulus algebras. Theorem. Let A,X,f,U connected. Let E
c
be as in theorem (14.2.2). Suppose that X is
U be a nonpolar set and l e t g
vanishes on f-l(E). Then g vanishes on X. Proof. First note that U is connected. By (14.2.2)
E
A such that g
Maximum modulus algebras log Z
9
:
U ->
R U {-a),X
-*
241
IIgIIf-l(X)S
is a subharmonic function and log Z (1)= -m f o r a l l X 6 E. Since E 9 Is a nonpolar set we see that log Z 9 -a on U, i.e. g 8 0 on X. 9 (14.2.5) Corollary. Let X,U,f.A be as in (14.2.4). Let x g c A vanishes in an open neighbourhood V of f-'(x).
E
U. Suppose
then g vanishes
identically on X. Proof. We show that there exists an open neighbourhood W c U of x so that g vanishes on f-l(W). Then our assertion follows by (14.2.4).
Suppose W does not exist. Then there exists a sequence (xn),,
in
X\V such that f(xn) converges to x. Since
nrN) U {x))\V
f-'((f(x,):
is a compact subset of X a subsequence of (xnIn converges to a
point y
E
X\V. But f(y) = x, and we get a contradiction.
0
Example. Let A.X.Y be as in example (14.1.3)~). We remarked that (using the notations of (14.1.3)~)): i) M ( A ) = X\Y contains no analytic disc, ii) ?l(M(A))
= {z
E
C: lz1O and Flu: U -> L=
F(U) is a homeomorphism. W.I.0.g. t(Zl
I...,
F(U) = Do,r. Let
zn): z2= ...=z n= O ) .
then
L
n F(U) = DX~OI,
where D = {z
E
C: I z l t r l and 0
E
Cn-l. By Wermer's subharmonicity
theorem (14.2.3). applied to the m.m.a.(*) (AIxLnU,XLflU)
and to
fllxmu E Alxmu* the function D ->
R U {-a),X ->
is subharmonic for a l l h
c
AIxLnu
loglho(f,IxLnu)
(note that fl: XLnU ->
homeomorphism), in particular for gIxLnu-a, Then
(*I
- by a theorem of h: D ->
Hartogs (cf. A.8 1
C, X ->
-1 ( X I I .
go(fllxLnu
a
E
D is a
C.
- either
)-l(M
or the conjugate of this function, i s holomorphic. Repeating the arguments for the function g.flIxLnu
(**I
D ->
C . X ->
X-ga(fll,
E
AIxLnu
we see that either
nu) -1 ( X I
L
or the conjugate of this function is holomorphic. We conclude easily from
(*I and (**I that h is holomorphic.
Repeating these arguments for an arbitrary complex line L which is parallel to a coordinate axis and for which L
n F(U) + 0 we
see that
g O F-' ILnFCU, is holomorphic. By Hartogs' theorem on separate analyticity (2.1.2)
Riemann domains is a holomorphic map and thus g
^A
ii) We have
c
E
247
Hol(X).
Hol(X) by I). The holomorphicaliy convex hull h
(cf. (2.2.6)) is compact for every compact subset K c X. since the Aconvex h u l l of K is already compact,cf. (4.3.3). Hol(X) separates the h
points of X. since A does. Hence X is a Stein manifold (cf. (2.2.6)). Moreover F forms a coordinate system at every point z
T1...Tn
E
2 we
see that
h
^A
X. Since
E
is a dense subalgebra of Hol(X) by (2.3.71, h
thus A = Hoi(X). because A is complete.
a
Remarksel) Theorem (15.1.2) is based on an idea of Rusek [RUS]. ii) Let (X.n) be a Riemann domain over Cn. Then II
(2.2.2). I f L is a complex line in Cn such that L
X,
E
Hoi(X)", cf.
n n(X)
= 0
is an analytic subset of (x.111. It follows that (Hol(X)I
XL
i s a m.m.a.(*).
.
then
X , ),
cf. (2.1.9) and remark (2.3.1). Thus theorem (15.1.2)
gives a characterization of the algebra o f al I holomorphic functions on a Riemann domain over Cn within the class o f uF-algebras. h
(15.1.3) Corollary. 1) Let (A,M(A)) be a rationally n-generated uFalgebra with locally compact spectrum M(A) and generating elements h
fl....,fn
such that (AIM(A)L.M(A)L) is a m.m.a.(*)
plex lines L
c
for a l l affine com-
Cn which are parallel to a coordinate axis and for
f(M(A)) which L fl
+ 0 (P=(?l.....f,)).
n
Then C(M(A)) is a rationally convex open set in Cn and A is topological ly and algebraically isomorphic t o Hol &M(A))). h
li) I f (A,M(A)) is n-generated by fl.....fn
then
-
under the assumptions
h
of part i) - F(M(A)) i s moreover a polynomially convex open set. Proof. By (15.1.2)
f
is an open mapping, hence a homeomorphism by
(5.1.4) resp. (5.2.3) and our assertion follows from (12.1.1). Example. Consider example (14.1.3)ii). In this example A is doubly
Chapter 15
248
A
generated, M(A) is locally compact and ( A I M ~ A ~ L , M ( A ) Lis) a m.m.a. for a l l affine complex lines which are parallel to the second coordinate axis. But A is not a Stein algebra. Suppose the contrary. Then there exists a Stein space X and a topological algebra homomorphism T: A ->
Hol(X). By remark (11.1.1)
SloT* i s a nonconstant holomorphic function on X. hence S1oT* i s an open subset o f the plane. But
'i,*T*(X) = ?l(M(A)) = R by (14.1.3)ii). I n particular A is not isomorphic t o the algebra of a l l holomorphic functions on a polynomially convex domain, although A is a m.m.a.(*) "on many lines". (15.2) Maximum modulus algebras and finite mappings Let (A.X) be a &-algebra.
f
c
A and W be a component of
f(M(A))\f(X). Suppose that there exists a set o f positive plane measure
G
c
W so that f o r a l l X c
G the set
f-'(X)
c
M(A) is finite.
Then - due to a classical r e s u l t of Bishop (cf. [WER each point p
c
?-'(W)
41,~.6 5 ) -
has a neighbourhood in M(A) which is a finite
union of analytic discs. Basener [BAS] and independently Sibony [SIB], introducing the concept of higher Shilov boundaries, obtained a r e s u l t on analytic structure of dimension n > l in the spectrum of uB-algebras if certain functions have finite fibers. Among others Wermer [WER 31, Senichkin [SEN 21. Rusek [RUS] and Kumagai [KUM 11 put these results in the setting o f maximum modulus algebras. We follow the proof o f Rusek and shall obtain the results of Basener and Sibony as a corollary in the next chapter. (15.2.1) Definition. We say that a t r i p l e (X,F.Y) i s an analytic cover with critical set S i f
Finite mappings
249
i) X is a locally compact Hausdorff space, Y
c
Cn i s a domain. and
F i s a proper, discrete and continuous mapping of X onto Y; ii) S i s an negligible set in Y. i.e. S is nowhere dense and f o r every
domain D
c
Y and every f
c
Hol(D\S) which is locally bounded on D
there exists a unique holomorphic extension ill) there is k
X\F-'(S) 8
E
r"
to a l l of D;
N such that F is a k-sheeted covering map from
onto Y\S. i.e. Flx,F-l(s)
is a local homeomorphism and
F-'(y) = k for a l l y c Y\S;
iv) X\F-'(S)
is dense in X.
(15.2.2) We shall deal with algebras o f the following type: Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space. and l e t A be a subalgebra of C(X)
- not necessarily closed - which contains the constants
and separates the points o f X. Let fl,...,fn i) F: X ->
W c Cn. x ->
E
A such that
,...,fn(x))
(fl(X)
is a proper mapping onto a domain W ii)
(AI,.X,)
Cn;
is a m.m.a.(*) for a l l affine complex lines f o r
* 6.
which L f l W
(X,
c
is defined as in (15.1.2). for the definition of a m.m.a.(*)
cf.
(14.1.2)iii)J (15.2.3) Theorem [RUS]. Let A. X, F, W. as in (15.2.2). Suppose that there exists a nonpluripolar subset E o f W such that number of points in F-l(X) wk =
E
-
is finite for every X
w: #F-l(X)
E
8
F-l(X)
-
E. Set for k
ii) the set
EL
N such that
S = W, U
N
= k).
Then i) there is k
E
the
w
=
w1 u ... u
... U w k - 1
w k and w k
*
#,
is a proper analytic sub-
set of W. ill) the triple (X.F,W) is an analytic cover with critical set S,
iv) there exists an analytic space structure of pure dimen-
Chapter 15
250
sion n on X such that A c Hol(X), if we endow X with this structure. (For the definition of a pluripolar set cf. A.14, for the definition of the dimension of a complex space cf. (7.1 1.1 (15.2.4) We divide the proof of theorem (15.2.3) into several steps. We f i r s t prove a lemma due t o Senichkin [SEN 21. Notation. Let (A,X) be a m.m.a.(*),
and l e t K
c
X be a compact set,
then A, denotes the uB-algebra on K which is obtained by completing AtK with respect to the norm
11-11,.
Lemma [SEN 21. Let (A,X) be a m.m.a.(*). an open set such that f: X ->
Let f
E
A. and l e t G
C be
G is a proper mapping onto G. Let
a e G, and l e t D be an open disc centered at a such that sure of D
c
- the clo-
- is contained in G.
Let m c f-'(a),
and l e t p be a representing measure for m concen-
trated on f"(dD)
with respect to the algebra A f - 1 ( ~ ) . For g
E
A
define qg
1,
C, z ->
= q: D ->
f
(f-a)g/(f-z)
dp.
(aD)
Then i) q is a bounded analytic function and
max{lq(z)l: t ii) if
c
D I s llgllf -1 (dD)'
c E dD and if a nontangential
then iq(Cl1 s
limit q(c) = l i m q(t) exists, t->c
llgllf-l(c,,
iii) q(a) = g(m).
(Here dD denotes the boundary of D.) Before we prove this lemma we give some explanations. Note that
f - h is a compact subset o f X since f is a proper .mapping. Denote by yAf-i(E) the Shilov boundary of Af-1(5). Then yAf-l(El
is contained
Finite mappings in f-’(dD) since (A.X) Is a m.m.a.(*).
251
By (1.3.10) there exists a repre-
senting measure p f o r m concentrated on yAf-1(5).
i.e. a positive
measure p such that
I
dp = 1
yA -1f
(D)
and
I
yA -1f
9 dP = g(m). for a l l gE
Af-1(5).
(0)
Hence the existence of a measure p in lemma (15.2.4) is always guaranteed. Proof of (15.2.4). i) For simplicity we assume that D is the open unit disc, hence a = 0 and
It is easy t o show that q i s complex differentiable and hence analytic
on 0. Let
M(Af-l(E)), then by (1.2.1)
‘QE
1R’Q)I g l l f l l f - l ( ~ ) 1. Hence t
E
(l-Tf)^ -
the Gelfand transform of 1-Tf
-
has no zero f o r
D , w h e r e T denotes the complex conjugate o f t, i.e. 1 - t f is inver-
tible in
A,-I(~)
by (1.2.9). We have f g / ( l - T f ) dp = f g / ( l - T f ) ( m ) = 0,
tl-’(aD)
since f(m) = 0. We multiply the l a s t equation b y 7 and add it to (*), then
For the l a s t equation note that for
C
E
dD
252
Chapter 15
c/ ((I-t 1(l-TC
t->
Since hn(yn) = h(y) we get from (*I
This inequality holds for almost a l l
E
dD. Since q i s a bounded
holomorphic function on D we have Ih(m)l = Iq(a)l
5
llhllx-l(aD).
0
(15.2.6) Remark. Let (A,X), f, G be as in (15.2.4) and use the notations o f (15.2.5). Let g
c
A.
I t follows by (14.2.2) and (15.2.5) that the map
G ->
R U {--I,
X ->
log IIhIIn-l(l),
256
Chapter 15
is a subharmonic function for each h
E
This observation i s of par-
A,'.
ticular interest in the case that h(xl
,...,xn)
= n(,g(xl)-g(xj)). 1
Note that h L Ah, since h is the sum of terms of the f orm kl k g (x1)*...*g "(x,), 0~k1,...,kn.
(15.2.7) Notation. Let A. X. F. W be as in (15.2.2). Fix k22. Denote by xk the subset of the k-fold Cartesian product of X consisting of a l l points
(Xi
,...,X k )
such that F(X1)'
...' F(Xk). Endow Xk
with the sub-
space topology and set w
X:
X ->
W. (xl,
....x k
->
F(xl).
n"
Then xk is a locally compact space and W. Fix g
E
9":
is a proper mapping onto
A. Define xk ->
c.
(X1*...8Xk) ->
n(g(xi)-g(xj)) i
and $k,g: W ->
RU
{--OD),
IOg
X ->
IIgII$-I(l)-
We remark that J, (X)=-m i f rrF-'(l)
is continuous. hence
R, X ->
II~II~-l(~),
is upper semi-continuous by (14.2.1). Hence the same i s true for log
zg = *k.g'
ill Let L be an arbitrary affine complex line such that L f l W 4 0.
Recall that (AIXL.XL) is a m.m.a.(*)
by our assumption. Identify L
Finite mappings
257
with C and denote by p the orthogonal projection from Cn onto L. Then poF
E
A and poFIxLr AIXL. Since poFI
(x)=F(x) for a l l x r X,
XL
we have FI
XL
E
A
. Then FIX, is a proper mapping from X, onto
1%
L n W . Furthermore G-~(XI =
X-~(X).
fo r
x
E
Lnw.
where we use the notation o f (15.2.5) replacing f by F(
xi
(AX .,(),
(A,X) by
and G by L n w . Denote by c k the intersection of x k with
the k-fold product of X,
g ~c:k
c,
->
and set (xl,...,xk)
31zk*
->
Then R U {--I,
L n W ->
X ->
log
is subharmonic by (15.2.6). So $k,g(Lnw
(15.2.8) Proof of (15.2.3). i) For i r
IIgJIn-l(x,. is subharmonic. since
N set
Ei = { A r E: #F-l(X) = i). Then
E = U El. Since a countable union
of piuripolar sets is pluri-
icN
polar, there i s k
E
N such that Ek is nonpluripolar. Assume there i s
X r W such that F-l(X) contains k + l different points ~ ~ , . . . , x k + ~Since .
A separates the points of X and contains the constants, there is grA so that g(xl) 8 g(x 1 for i 9 j (cf. the proof of (3.2.311, hence j
$k+l,g(X) But $k+l.g
*
is plurisubharmonic on W by (15.2.7) and $k+l,g
Ek, and we get a contradiction. Hence
=
-a on
258
Chapter 15
Suppose that there exists an open set U
c
w\wk=w1u...uwk-1'
Then there is I t k so that WI is nonpluripolar, since sets which have positive Lebesgue measure are nonpluripolar. Repeating the argument above this implies that W -0 for j > l . But this is a contradiction to
* 6, thus w k
wk
1-
iS
dense in
w.
ii) We f i r s t show that F is an open mapping.
FIX xleX and set y=F(xl). By I) there is I r k such that F~'~y~=~xl,...,xll. Let K
c
X be a compact neighbourhood of xl,
and l e t U be a compact
such that K n U = 0.
neighbourhood of {x2....,xI)
We claim that there i s a closed polycylinder that F ' b
c
Cn centered at y so
KUU.
Otherwise there would be a sequence (z,), y as v ->
F(zJ ->
c
F-~({F(Z,,):
in X\(KUU) so that
Since F Is proper
QD.
{y))
V~NIU
is a compact subset of X and a subsequence of (zJV converges to a point z zv
E
X. Then z
E
E
{x,,....xI)
X\(KUU) for a l l v
Next we claim that D
E
c
and we get a contradiction to
N.
F(K).
Suppose the contrary. Then there is an affine complex line L so that a ) L n D n F( K )
+ 0 and
*
8) L ~ ( D \ F ( K ) )
0.
Since K Is compact it follows by a ) and 8) that F(K)nLfID contains a boundary point (in the relative topology of L). But (A1
XL
m.m.a.(*),
,XL) is a
and FlxLc AtXL by the proof of (15.2.7). hence F(F-l(LnD)nK) = F( K) n L n D
i s an open set by lemma (14.1.4)ii) (in the relative topology of L).
Thus we get a contradiction, hence F is an open mapping. Let k be as in I), and l e t x
w k . Then
F - ~ X )
= (x l.....xk).
Choose
259
Finite mappings
....Uk of
disjoint open and relatively compact neighbourhoods U1, x
,,...,xk
In X. Then k V = f l F(Ui) l=1
i s a neighbourhood of x. since F is open, and V
w k ' Hence w k is
c
open and
s
=
w1u ...uWk-1
Is closed. Let x,
= w\wk
Ul,....Uk be as above. Then Ui fl F'l(V)
is an open
neighbourhood of xi and F i s injective on UI fl F-l(V) f o r i=l,
. F: F-'(Wk) ->
...,k,
i.e.
wk
Is a local homeomorphism. We can now follow the proof of theorem
(15.1.2) t o show that there is a uniquely determined structure of an n-dimensional manifold on F-'(Wk) such that glF-l(wkl
is a holo-
morphic map (with respect t o this structure) for a l l g
e
A.
Next we show that S Is an analytic subset of W. FIX g
L
A and define if z
0 where x;
....,x;
the value of
9"
if z
wk t
w\wk
are the points of F - b ) in some ordering. Note that is independent of which ordering is chosen. Let Ui be
open nelghbourhoods of x;
so that FI
UI
is a homeomorphism ( 1 4 .
....k).
Then 9" F- lIF(uI)
Q
Hoi(F(Ui)) for i=l,
as observed above, and tions o f this form. thus We claim that
9"
....k
9" is locally just the 9" i s analytic on w k '
sum of products of func-
Is continuous on W.
To prove this l e t b
f
( d W k ) n w be an arbitrary point. Let (zvIv be a
260
Chapter 15
sequence in w k which converges t o b. Suppose there exists 8 > O and a subsequence (zVili such that Ig(x;v')-g(x;v91
4
2
s
if i
* j.
i
c
N.
z
Let yI be an accumulation point of
{z
vi
1
i
(Such a point exists since
N)U{b) is a compact set and F is a proper mapping.) Then
E
yI c F-l(b) and
lg(yl)-g(yj)12s But b
E
If j 4 i.
w \ w k , so *F-'(b)" is trivial. ii) Assertion 1. Let F=(fl....,fn)
E
An. cp
E
V h . and l e t U be an open
neighbourhood of V h i n M(A). Then there is G a Bn such that cp and V(%) Let a
E
c
E
V(&
U.
C\{Ol. Obviously V t R = VtA) for H=(af l.....afn).
and by the compactness of M(A)\U x
a
M(A)\U there is i
Now choose gl. ...,gn
a
(1.
-
-
we can assume that for each
....n l such that
l?l(x)l>l.
....
A
a
Therefore
B such that ~ ~ ~ i - f l ~ ~ M ~ fAo r) n V ( R so that
E
A
2 71
Higher Shllov boundaries n
g(5) =
l1311v(finK = 1,
and
I'$1'
< 1/2.
V (fin( K \ int L)
The set
S = (8
t
V t R n K : c(8) = 1) (consider h = (g+1)/2).
is a peak set of Av(finK
A
Let (Knln be an admissible A-convex exhaustion of M(A). w.1.o.g.
K
c
K1. For each n
principle (1.4.9) '('V
E
N S is a local and hence - by Rossi's maximum A
-
a global peak set of Av(finK
n
. (Note that
(finKn 1 = VtfiflK, by (4.3.31.)
Suppose that for each 8
E
S there exists n(8)
E
N such that 8 is not
A
contained in yoAv(p,nKnte). Then there exists an open nelghbourhood N of 8 in V ( f i such that
Since S Is compact there i s m yO'V(%Kn
=
E
N such that
0 for a l l n
2
m.
This is impossible. A
By (9.1.3) S fl yoA,(p,
* 0, hence K n yo%,,(p,*
0. A
Since there exists a neighbourhoodbasis of cp consisting of A-convex compact subsets by (4.3.7)ii).
we are done.
The case n=O can be proved in a similar way.
0
(16.2.3) Corollary. Let A be a uF-algebra with locally compact spectrum M(A1. and l e t n t (0,l.
...). Then the following statements are
equivalent: i) ynA = 0; A
A
ii) ynAU = 0, for each hemlcompact A-convex open subset
U of M(A);
Chapter 16
272 h
ill) ynAK c dK
-
the boundary of K
- f or
A
each A-convex com-
pact subset K of M A ) . Proof. i)osil) This follows from (16.2.2). A
i i i b i ) Suppose there exists p
c
ynA. Choose a compact A-convex
neighbourhood K of 9 . Then p
c
y n 2 K by part i) of the proof of
(16.2.2). This is impossible. ii)=+iii)Suppose there are a compact 2-convex set K p
c
M(A) and
A
E
(int K) f l ynAK.
Choose an open, hemicompact and 3-convex neighbourhood U c K of p by (4.3.7)ii). Then, repeating the proof of part 1) in (16.2.21, we h
see that p c ynAU. This is a contradiction.
O
273
CHAPTER 17 LOCAL ANALYTIC STRUCTURE IN THE SPECTRUM OF A UF-ALGEBRA
In the theory of several complex variables one is not always interested in the global behavior of a function on i t s entire domain of definition. There are situations in which one considers the behavior of a function in arbitrary small neighbourhoods of a fixed point. This leads t o the notion of germs of holomorphic functions at a point p
€
cn.
This notion can be easily carried over t o uF-algebras. Let A be a uFalgebra with locally compact spectrum M(A). and l e t cp denote by
^Acp
E
M(A). We
A
the algebra of germs of functions of A at cp. I n this
chapter we show that A has analytic structure in 9, if there are a l A
gebraic relations between A holomorphic functions at 0
(Q
E
-
and
the algebra o f germs of
Cn.
Most results of this chapter are due t o Brooks. (17.1) Local rings of functions of uF-algebras (17.1.1) Throughout this chapter we always consider uF-algebras with locally compact spectrum M(A). If U
c
M(A) is an open and hemicompact subset, then C(U) i s a uFA
algebra by (4.1.4)ii). hence A, Let cp
Q
c
C(U) by (4.1.5).
M(A). Let U and W be open and hemicompact neighbourhoods
of cp in M(A). We c a l l f
h
E
A,
A
and g E,,,A ,
there exists an open neighbourhood V
c
equivalent at cp. provided U f l W of cp such that fl,=glv. ' A
,, This gives an equivalence relation on the disjoint union U A
where
the union is taken over a l l open and hemicompact neighbourhoods U
274
Chapter 17
of cp. A
An equivalence class w i l l be called a germ of a function of A at cp. We denote by f A
P
the equivalence class of an element f
A
A,
E
and by
Ap the set of a l l equivalence classes. h
h
A
Let gp, fcpc Alp. Choose representative functions f c A, A
Then f+&
and g E. ,A
V
resp. fglv are w e l l defined elements of .A ,
U n W an
c
open and hemicompact neighbourhood of cp. We set
flp + go = (f+gIp, f+gcp = (fgIcp. It is easy to see that these operations are well-defined, i.e. they are
independent of the choice of representatives of fcpand g
A
9'
Hence Acp
is a commutative algebra with unit. Let f
h
cp
c
Alp. Choose a representative f
A
E
A,
of f
cp'
Set fcp(cp)= f(cp).
A
then f (cp) is well-defined. A is a local algebra, i.e. there exists cp cp exactly one maximal ideal M In and
glp,
M = {f, (If f (cp)
c
gcp:fcp(cp)= 0)
* 0, there exist
A
an open, hemicompact and A-convex neigh-
cp A bourhood W of cp and a representative f c ,A
f($)
* 0 for a l l
$
E h
we see that l / f c ,A
W (use (4.3.7)il)). Since M(S,)
6
= W by (4.3.4)iii) A
by (6.1.41, hence fcpis invertible in AT.)
Let U, W be open neighbourhoods of p g
of flp such that
c
Cn. Then f c Hol(U),
Hol(W) are called equivalent at p if there is an open neighbour-
hood V c U n W of p such that fl,
= 9.1,
The algebra of germs of
holomorphic functions a t p. defined as above, w i l l be denoted by
0
n P'
(17.1.2) Theorem [BRO 51. Let A be a uf-algebra with locally compact spectrum M(A), and l e t cp be a Gg-point in M(A)\yn-,A. Then the following statements are equivalent: i) There exists a surjective algebra homomorphism
Local analytic structure ii)
2 has
275
analytic structure in cp. More precisely. there are
a neighbourhood W of cp in M(A), an open set D homeomorphism F A
Cn and a
D, such that the map -1 foF
W ->
:
Hol(D). f ->
>-,,A ,,
c
,
is a (we1I-defined) topological algebra isomorphism. (Here Y,-~A
denotes the (n-1)-th Shilov boundary of A, cf. chapter
16. Recall that cp is a Gg-point if it is the intersection of countable many open subsets o f M(AI.1 We divide the proof of the theorem into several steps. (17.1.3) Lemma [BRO
61.
[CLA 21. Let A be a uF-algebra with lo-
cally compact spectrum M(A), and l e t cp
E
pose that there are a neighbourhood U
M(A) of cp, a topological
space Y and a map F: U -> For each f
E
c
M(A) be a Gg-point. Sup-
Y with the following property:
A there exists a complex-valued function G defined in
some neighbourhood of F(p) so that
? = GmF in
some neighbourhood
of p. Then F is injective in some neighbourhood of p. Proof. 1) By proposition (4.4.2) there exists a countable descending open neighbourhoodbasis V1
3
V2
3
... o f cp.
ii) We may assume that V1 is contained In Us the domain of definition
of F. We shall prove the lemma by contradiction. Suppose the lemma i s false. Then there is a sequence of pairs (xi. yiIi such that for a l l i r N
i) xi and yi are elements of Vi\{cp), ii) xi
W.1.o.g.
* yi
but F(xi) = F(yi).
we can assume that xi, yi, xl, yj are pairwise disjoint points
for i*j. By (8.1.4) we can choose an element f
B
A such that P i s injective
276
Chapter 17
on the union of a l l points xi, yi.
?
Now choose G defined in a neighbourhood of F(p) such that GoF = in a neighbourhood W of p, w.1.o.g. W = V1. Then for a l l i E N,
?(xi) = GoF(xi) = GoF(yi) = ?(yi)
and we get a contradiction.
0
(17.1.4) Let A be a uF-algebra with locally compact spectrum M(A), cp
E
M(A). Let U
and l e t F
c
M(A) be an open, hemicompact neighbourhood of cp. such that F(cp) = 0. Set
E
A
F*: nOo ->
*
Acp. g ->
where g represents
9"
(goF)cp,
in a neighbourhood W of 0
E
Cn. We claim that
F* is a well-defined algebra homomorphism. Since M(A) Is locally compact and F: U ->
Cn is continuous there
A
exists an open, hemicompact and A-convex neighbourhood V of CQ in M(A) such that V c U and F(V) A
by (6.1.21, since M(AJ
c
W, cf. (4.3.7)ii). We have geF
A
B
A,
= V by (4.3.4)iii). Using ii) of (6.1.2) one
sees that F* is independent of the choice of g, and our claim is proved. Let f be a representative of
7 c ,,ao.Set
?iO) = f(O), then 7(0)is
well-defined, and
cl =
(3
E
,O0' 7CO) = 0)
is the only maximal ideal in
Lemma [BRO 51, [CLA 21.
Let A be a uF-algebra with locally com-
pact spectrum M(A), and l e t cp finite ,O0-algebra f
,,...,fr
h
E
A
E
M(A) be a point such that Alp is a
via some algebra homomorphism q, i.e. there are
A,+, such that
^A cp
= q(,O0)f,
+
... + q(,O0)fr. A
Then there exist an open, hemicompact and A-convex
neighbour-
Local analytic structure
hood U o f cp and F
(3Jn so that
E
Proof. As above denote by
M resp.
277
F(cp)=O and q = F*.
G the maximal
A
ideal of A
n00' i) We f i r s t endow
2cp
,ao with the m-adic
and
resp.
9
topology and show
that both spaces are Hausdorff spaces.
-
A fundamental system of neighbourhoods of
E
,ao resp. gcp
i s given by sets of the form h + -k M resp. g +Mk, k cp
E
E3cp
N, where
Gk = (9" E ,,ao:There exist I E N. elements r"ii E G , lsisk, I k lsjsl. such that 9" = c n q,}. j=l i = l
We have
n Gk= 0 (cf.
[KIK].
p. 70). hence
kc N
,ao is a Hausdorff
space. Since
,ao is a noetherian
q(nOo) and A
A
-
([NAG],
cp
ring ([K/K],
p. 801, the same is true for
- for
since it is a finitely generated q(nOo)-algebra
p. 9). So
^A
cp
is a noetherian local ring, hence
n
Mk = 0
k tN A
by Krull's intersection theorem, and we see that A
cp
is a Hausdorff
space, too. ii) We claim that the germs of the polynomials lie dense in
,,ao.
9" E ,ao be an arbitrary element, and l e t g be a representative 9". Considering the power series expansion of g at 0. we may write
Let of
OD
9 =
c Pi' i=o
where the Pi's are homogeneous polynomials of degree i. Set
then
9" -
rw
(?o+...+Pi-,)
cu
= Qj
and our assertion follows.
E
Gj. for a l l j
E
IN.
278
Chapter 17
....zn the coordinate functions and set
iii) Denote by zl.
(fiIp = q(Zi)
, i=1,...,n.
Choose representatives fi of (f 1 in an open, hemicompact and %icp “ n convex neighbourhood U of cp, i=l ,n. Set F = ( fl,...,fn) c (Au)
,...
We claim that q(% Let
5
E
0
.
M.
c
be an element such that q(5) c 29\Ms i.e. q(5)(cp)=cSO.
OIv
Then q(5-c-1 )(cp)=O, hence gh-c-i* is not invertible in 1.e.
5 e ,0,\3.
“ “k 1
It follows that q(h+M
k for every k
c q(C)+M
E
,o0, so t(O)=c,
N. hence q is con-
tinuous.
,....
iv) We have (f 1 (cp) = 0 fo r i=1 n. i.e. F(cp) = 0. by iii). icp ‘v Let P(zl,...,zn) be a polynomial and denote by P ( z l.....~n) the germ
of P(z
,,...,zn)
in
,,ao.Then
Iv
q(P(z
= (P(f,
=P(qq
2,))
,#””
#...)
q(i;l)l = P((fl)cp #...,(f 1 1 = ncp
,...,f n1)c p = F*(P(z,, ...,zn)). N
Hence q and F* coincide on the polynomials. v ) Since q and F
* coincide on a dense subset of
by ii) and i v )
we see that F * = q by 1) and iii).
0
(17.1.5) Proof of theorem (17.1.2). Assume 1). Since yn-lA
is a closed
subset of M(A) and M(A) is locally compact, there exists an open, hemicompact and %-convex neighbourhood U of cp in M(A). such that yn-lAnU = 8 , by (4.3.7)ii).
It follows from (16.2.2) that
A
Since q is surjective, A
,ao
is a finite algebra (via q). Hence there cp A exists an open, hemicompact and A-convex neighbourhood W c U of cp such that there exists F e (%,,,,I with n q = F* by (17.1.4).
279
Local analytic structure
Let h
E
A be an arbitrary element. Choose
5 c ,ao such that
n
hp = F*(9").
Hence there exist a neighbourhood V of 0 in Cn and a representative
g
E
Hol(V) of
5
such that h = goF in a neighbourhood of cp. Thus F is
injective in a neighbourhood % o f cp by (17.1.31, w.1.o.g.
W=%. Note
that M(A,)=W. Now l e t L be an affine complex line in Cn. parallel t o a coordinate axis, so that LnF(W)
* 0. Set
W, = F-'(F(W)nL). Then M($
= W,
WL h
=
from yn-lAw
(cf. (4.3.4)iii))
is locally compact and it follows A
0
(cf. (16.2.2)) that ( AJWW ., ),
is a m.m.a.(*),
using (9.1.6) and (9.1.7). We can now apply theorem (15.1.2) t o A
(Aw.W) and F. By (15.1.2)i) F is a homeomorphism onto the open subset F(W)
E
Cn, and g0F-l
E
Hol(F(W)) for each g
A
E
,A
by the proof
of (15.1.2)i) p. 246/247. Using (15.1.2)ii) we see that the map A
->
Hol(F(W)). g
_*
9.F -1
I
defines in fact a topological algebra isomorphism. The inverse statement is evident.
0
(17.1.6) Corollary [BRO 51. Let A be a separable uF-algebra with locally compact spectrum, and l e t Y,-~A = 0. Then the following statements are equivalent: i) For every cp z M(A) there exists a surjective algebra homo-
morphism q
0
A
A (9' ( 9 n o ii) M(A) can be equipped with the structure of an n-dimen:
->
sional Stein manifold such that M(A) with this structure.
3 = Hol(M(A)).
if we endow
280
Chapter 17
Proof. Assume 1). Let cp
E
M(A) be an arbitrary point. By (4.4.3) cp is
a G8-point. h
For each cp c M(A) there exist an open, hemicompact and A-convex nelghbourhood U of cp in M A ) , an open set Wp cp -> W , so that the map morphism F : cp cp ucp
c
Cn and a homeo-
defines a topological algebra isomorphism (note that F c cp by (17.1.2)). Let U nu c p Q
(2
In
"9
* 0. We conclude easily that
,is a biholomorphlc mapping, i.e. M(A) can be equipped with the struch
ture of an n-dimensional complex manifold such that A
c
Hol(M(A)).
Since M A ) is 2-morphically convex we can endow M(A) with the h
structure of a Stein space such that A = Hol(M(A),O). where Hol (M(A),O) denotes the algebra of al I holomorphic functions with respect to this structure, cf. (11.1.3). Let f be a holomorphic map on M(A) with respect to the manifold structure, 1.e. f0F-l cp flUp E
E
Hol(U 1 for a l l cp c M(A). Then 9
2up = H~I(M(A),o)
for a l i cp
E
MA).
and it follows that both structures coincide on M(A), since a l l elements of Hol(M(A),O)
are holomorphic on U with respect t o the cp
new structure, because Hol(U ,O) is complete with respect to the cp compact open topology. 0 (17.1.7) The next theorem shows that In cp c M(A) if
^A cp
^A has s t i l l
analvtic structure
is only a finite ,Oo-algebra.
Theorem [BRO 51. Let A be a uF-algebra with locally compact spec-
28 1
Local analytic structure trum M A ) , and l e t cp
M(A)\yn,lA
E
be a G&-point. Then the following
statements are equivalent:
^A '0
i)
is a finite ,O0-algebra
morphism
(via some algebra homo-
r));
ii) There exists a neighbourhood U of cp which can be en-
dowed with an analytic space structure of pure dimension n
= Hol(U) with respect t o this structure.
n such that A,
Proof. Assume i). Choose a neighbourhood that
r) N
Let hl, hl,
U of
cp and F
(3Jn such
E
= F*, according to (17.1.4). Recall that F(cp) = 0.
"
n
...,hr
...,hr
A
in,,,,A, A:
over F*(,,o0), and choose representatives cp an open neighbourhood of cp. Set
generate A W
c
W ->
U
Cn+r,
JI ->
(F($),H(JI)),
where H = (hl,...,hr). a ) Claim.
A
is injective in some neighbourhood o f cp.
Set n(cp) = p. Let g n
= i=l
g~
E
A be an arbitrary element. We have
F*(Si)Ci
for some
Choose a polydisc D centered at 0 sented by a function si cp such that F(V) A
g =
c
E
Zl,..., E
'r "
n 0o *
Cn so that each Ci is repre-
Hol(D). Choose a neighbourhood V
c
W of
D and
C (sioF)hi r
on V.
i=l Define
P
G : DxCr -> Then G
E
C, ( 2 . ~ 1->
f: si(z)wi.
i=l
Hoi(DxCr) and A
g =
Golr
on V.
Our assertion follows now from lemma (17.1.3). W.i.0.g. that
A
is injective on V.
we assume
282
Chapter 17 hl
8) Claim. There exists a neighbourhood V of cp such that
A / J , (f+I) + J
f+J,
defines a bijective algebra homomorphism. Fix n
E
N, and l e t f
E
A,
then inf{pn(f+g): g by
(*I.
E
J") = inf {pn(f+g+h): g E J", h E I)
I t follows from this equality that T is a topological iso-
morphism. Since A/? is a uF-algebra by our hypothesis the same i s true fo r (A/I)/J and it follows that A / I is a u*F-algebra.
(19.2.3) Proposition. Let A be a uF-algebra. Then A is a u*F-algebra iff the restriction map
is surjective for each kernel ideal I. A
(More precisely: Let (KnIn be an admissible A-convex exhaustion of M(A), set K;1 = V(I)nKn. Then (K;In
A
is an admissible A-convex ex-
haustion of the closed subset V(I), and we consider the map
Proof. i) Suppose the restriction map is surjective. The map
T: A / I ->
A
A,(
f+I
-' (?IKhIn,
is an injective and continuous homomorphism. By our hypothesis T is even surjective, hence a homeomorphism by the open mapping theoA
,(, rem for Frechet spaces. Our assertion follows, since A
i s a uF-
algebra. 11) Suppose that A / I Is a uF-algebra. By (3.2.10) M(A/I) = V(1). Let
(Knln and (K,'),
be as in i). Then the topology of (A/I)*, the algebra A
o f the Gelfand transforms of A/I, and the topology of A ,(, fined by the same sequence of seminorms
(ll-llKh)n. Hence
defines a topological homomorphism onto it s image.
is dethe map
Chapter 19
308
Since (A/IIA is a uF-algebra by our hypothesis and since
T"
has
h
dense range we see that (A/1IA is isomorphic t o Avo,. A
Let f
E
A,(,,
be an arbitrary element. Choose g
A such that
E
?((g+I)^ 1 = f. Then i(g) = f.
0
(19.2.4) Remark. Let A be a u*F-algebra. It follows from the proof of ill that in this case A / I i s topologically and algebraically ison
morphic t o Avo,
n
for each kernel ideal I A. Hence M(AV(,+ can be
identified as a topological space with V(1). (In the case that M(A) is locally compact this follows by (4.3.4)iii)J A
If A is moreover a u*FS-algebra, then A,(,,
is a u*FS-algebra by
remark (19.1.1)ii) and (19.2.2). (19.2.5) Examp1es.i) Let X be a hemicompact k-space. Then (C(X).X) is a uF-algebra by (4.1.4)ii). Let Y
c
X be a closed subset, and l e t (KnIn be an admissible ex-
haustion of X. Set K;I=YnKn, then (K;In of Y. Let (fnIn e C(X),
=)kC(K;)
i s an admissible exhaustion
be an arbitrary element.
Using the extension theorem of Tietze (3.1.9) we find F1 P C(K,) so that FIK,=
fl. Set
g2: K i U K 1 ->
C , x ->
I
F1(x) if x f2(x)
6
K1
if x is not contained in K,.
Then g2 is continuous. Using again Tietze's theorem we find F2
E
C(K2) such that F2lKkUK,= g2. Continuing in this manner we get
a complex-valued function F on X. such that FI
Kil
F is continuous, since FI
Kn
= fn for a l l n
= Fn is continuous f or all n
E
E
N.
N and X is
a k-space. Hence (C(X),X) is a u*F-algebra by (19.2.3). ii) Let A be a Stein algebra, i.e. A is isomorphic to Hol(X1. X a hemi-
compact reduced Stein space. Let I
c
Hol(X) be a kernel ideal. Then
Strongly uniform Fr6chet algebras
309
each element of Hol(V(1)) can be extended t o an element of Hol(X) by (2.3.31, hence A is a u*F-algebra by (19.2.3). iii) In [KRA
51 Kramm
gives an example of a uFS-algebra which is
not strongly uniform. (19.2.6) Finite sets are the only compact analytic subsets of a domain in
c".
cf. (7.1.1)
. We prove an analogue
Definition. Let A be a uF-algebra, and l e t S
c
f o r u*FS-algebras.
A be an arbitrary set.
The set WS) =
((QE
M ( A ) : q(f) = 0 for a l l f
E
S)
is called the h u l l of S. Theorem [KRA
11.
Let A be a u*FS-algebra. and l e t Y be a compact
hull in M A ) . Then Y is a finite set. Proof. Let I algebra
E
A be the kernel with respect t o Y. Then A / I is a uFS-
. We have M ( A / I ) = V ( I ) = Y.
A / I is isomorphic t o ( A / I I A , since it is a uF-algebra. The topology of ( A / I I A is defined by the norm
11-11,,
i.e. (A/IIn and hence A / I is a
uB-algebra. By remark (19.l.l)iv) A / I is finite dimensional and our assertion follows.
0
Remarks. i) We need the strong uniformity to conclude from the compactness of M(A/I)=Y that A / I is a uB-algebra. cf. (19.1.2)ii). ill Let A be a u*FS-algebra, and l e t Y
c
M ( A ) be a hul I . Suppose
that X i s an open and closed subset of Y (with respect to the relah
h
tive topology). Then A, is a u*FS-algebra. Y=M(A,),
by (19.2.4).
and
X is a h u l l in M(2,) by Shilov's ldempotent theorem (6.1.5). Hence
if X is moreover compact then X is a finite set by (19.2.6).
310
Chapter 19
(19.3) Cheval lev dimension fo r uF-alaebras (19.3.1) We introduce the notion of dimension for uF-algebras. I t is motivated by the Chevalley dimension in complex analysis (cf. (7.1.1)) or commutative algebra.
Definition. i) Let A be a uF-algebra, and l e t cp
I
M(A). Define d(cp)
....fn e ker cp
t o be the minimum of a l l n c N such that there exist fl,
-
and a neighbourhood U of cp such that the map
P: u
c", Q ->
tf;(Q)
A
fJQ)),
I...,
has finite fibers, 1.e. the set u n F - V c $ ) ) is finite for each Q
I
U.
If the minimum does not exist set d(cp)=aD. The Chevalley dimension of cp in M(A) is defined by dlmpM(A) =
I
0
if cp is an isolated point in M(A),
d(cp1 otherwise.
-
ill Let A be a u*F-algebra, Y c M(A) a hull, and l e t cp
3: A/k(Y)
->
C , f+k(Y)
e
Y. Then
cp(f),
defines an element o f M(A/k(Y)) by (3.2.10). We set dim Y = dim#vl(A/k(Y)) 9
and c a l l it the dimension of cp w i t h respect to the hull Y. Remarks. 1) We can identify M(A/k(Y)) with V(k(Y))=Y as topological spaces by (3.2.101, hence we can interpret cp as an element of M(A/k(Y)) and shall use henceforth the more suggestive formulation dim Y = dimpM(A/k(Y)). 9 ill I f X is a hemicompact Stein space, i.e. X = M(Hol(X)) by (2.3.21,
the above defined dimension equals the usual notibn o f dimension, cf.
311
Cheval ley dimension (7.1.1).
(19.3.2) Definition (19.3.1) immediately yields the following remarks. Remarks. I) Let A be a u*F-algebra, and l e t Y
c
M(A) be a hul l.
Then the mapping
N U {OD-),
Y ->
dim Y. cp
cp ->
is upper semi-continuous. i.e. for every cp a Y there exists a nelghbourhood U
c
-
Y of cp such that
dim Y 5 dim Y fo r a l l @ e U. cp 4 If dim Y < f o r a l l cp E Y. this mapping i s bounded on any relatively cp compact subset o f Y. ii) The sets {cp a Y: dim Y
cp
n),{cp
a
Y: dim Y < n), cp
are open, the sets {cp
e
Y: dim Y > n). {cp cp
a
Y: dim Y cp
5
n),
are closed for a l l n a N. (19.3.3) Next we prove a theorem which is an analogue t o the semicontinuity of fiber dimensions of holomorphic mappings (cf. [G/R]. p. 114). I n complex analysis this theorem is proved by the classical Weierstra6 theorems, which are not available in our setting. Theorem [KRA 11. Let A be a u*FS-algebra with locally compact spectrum M(A). and l e t F = (f l,...,fn)
M(A) ->
NU{O,-I, cp ->
An. Then the map A- 1 dimPF E
(F(cp)).
is upper semi-continuous. i.e. for every cp bourhood U of cp such that "-1 A dimpF (F(cp)) 2 dirn,f-'(~(@))
c
M(A) there exists a neigh-
for a l l
"-1 A (Note that F (F(cp)) is a h u l l in M(A) f or a l l cp
JI c U. E
M(A1.1
312
Chapter 19
We shall deduce theorem (19.3.3) from part i) of the next theorem. Part ii) w i l l be needed later. (19.3.4) Theorem. Let A be a u*FS-algebra with locally compact spectrum M(A), and l e t F = (fl,
...,fn) e An.
1) Suppose that cp c M(A) is an isolated point of the fiber
Then there is a neighbourhood W c M(A) of cp such that fibers on W, 1.e. dim M(A) c n fo r a l l $
JI
E
P-l(f(cp)).
c has finite
W.
ii) Let U be an open, hemicompact and %-convex subset of M(A). and A
l e t cp e U. (By (4.3.4)iii) we can identify M(AJ as a topological space h
with U, hence we can interpret cp as an element of M(A,). dim M(A) = dim M($J 9 cp
for a l l cp
E
Then
U.
Proof. I) Denote by [cp] the Gleason part which contains cp. By remark (19.1.l)iii),(l8.2.3)
[cp] is an open subset of M(A). If [cp] is
compact then cp is an isolated point of M(A) and our assertion becomes trivial.
If [cp] is not compact we can choose a compact neighbourhood K of cp with 6K
* 0 and
(*I
KnC-'(P(cp))= (91.
W.1.o.g. we can assume that t ions ?l-?l(cp
1,...,fn-?,, ( cp) . Set
P(cp) = 0 . otherwise consider the func-
A
S: M(A) ->
R, J, ->
max{i?l($)l,
...,i?"($)i).
Then S is continuous and we have
by the compactness o f 6K and by
W =
(*I. Set
{JI E K: S($) < 8/21.
Then W is an open neighbourhood o f cp. For an arbitrary point $, the set
E
W
Cheval ley dimension
is compact and relatively open in
C-l(C(+o))nd~ = by (**I. Since ?l(?(@o))
313
P-l(P(@o))s since
0
is a h u l l in M(A). YJlo is a finite set by r e -
mark (19.2.6) ii). h
ii) By our assumptions (A,,U)
A
is a uF-algebra and M(A,)
= U by
(4.3.4)iii). Clearly dim M(A) cp
2
dm i pM$ (.),
To show the inverse inequality choose an arbitrary point cp e U and set A
r = dim M(A,). 9
The assertion is trivial if r=m or r=O. Let O
h
Avo,
. We shall
show that the restriction map
is surjective. This yields our assertion by (19.2.3).
We endow Xi always with he induced euclidean topology. If V(l)nX, has an accumulation point, then Xi V(I) = U X I IRJ
c
V(I) by the identity theorem. So
u s.
where J is a subset of NU{O) (possibly empty) and S is a discrete subset of M A ) \ U X i with respect t o the Gelfand topology (possibly IRJ
Chapter 19
320
empty). This follows by (*I and since the induced Gelfand topology and the induced euclidean topology are equivalent on X and on every xi* A A Let f E A,(*)
be an arbitrary element.
Case 1: J is a finite set. Then U X i is an analytic subset of C2, hence by (2.3.3) there exists IaJ
f'
Hol(C2) such that
f'lu x, -- fl u
ItJ
IrJ
We note that
XI'
= f'IMCA)c 3.
r"
Case 11. J is not finite. It follows by the identity theorem that 0 c J. Set
ax) =
Then
?Ix
E
I
if x
f(x)
c
uxi,
IrJ
f(l/i,O) if x c Xi, i not contained in J.
Hol(X) and
r"I(D,{O,lx{O, is bounded, hence r"
I n both cases we have found an element il"X,
r" c ^A
c
^A
by ill).
such that
- flux, * ItJ
IrJ
* 0 , then SnX, consists of a t most countable many points without an accumulation point In Xi. If SnXo * 0 , then J is finite or
If SnXi
empty and SU{(l/i,O): IEJ) is a discrete subset of Xo. Choose go c Hol(Xo) such that g,(y)=f(y)-?(y)
for a l l y
E
SnX,,
and go(l/i,O)=O for i
E
by the theorems of Weierstra6 and Mittag-Leffler. The function
go(x)
=
I
go(1/i,O) If x c Xi' go(x)
defines an element of
^A
if x
E
xo
by lli). If SnXo = 0 we set
go = 0.
J.
Characterization of Stein algebras Set J' = (i
321
N: sncx,\cci/i,o)~)*:rs~.
6
For i e J' we use again the theorems of Weierstra6 and Mittag-Leffl e r t o find g1 E Hol(Xi) so that gi(y)=f(y)- fz(y)-g",(y)
if y
E
Sn(Xi\((l/i),O)))
and gi(l/i,O)=O.
By iii) the function
1
if x is not contained in Xi
I 0
i&(X)
lies in
=
gi(x) if x
0
xi
2. Hence
vi) M(A) is purely one dimensional.
The map p: M(A) ->
C. (z.w) ->
defines an element of
2. For x
Z-w
,
X it is easy t o find a (Gelfand open)
Q
neighbourhood U of x such that p has finite fibers on U. Now set f(z,w) =
Then f
E
^A
n w if (z.w)
E
Xn, n r l .
0
€
xo.
i2
if (2.w)
by Hi). Set
U = ( ( 2 . ~ 1a M(A): if(z.w)l < 1) Then U is a (Gelfand open) neighbourhood of ( 0 . 0 ) by (3.2.211).
.. .. .... . . U ......... .... *
. :. .
.-.. . . :. .: -... . . -*. . .
. ..
\
Chapter 19
322 Choose an arbitrary point zo
C\COI. For rial set
S, = p-l(zO)nunxn = {(l/n,w): (l/n)-w=zo, I w i < l / n2I. Hence Sn = 0 for a l l n
L
N such that (l/n)+(l/n 2 )
ker p, g ->
fg.
Clearly i Is a continuous and surjective linear mapplng. If 0 = i(g)=fg,
then BIM(A)\W
by
(**I, hence g
=o
0, since {p) is not an Isolated point of M(A). This
proves that i Is Injective, hence a homeomorphism by the open mapping theorem. By the proof of (4.4.2) there exists a countable open nelghbourhoodbasis
...
3
Un
3
Un+l
3
... of p. Let (KnIn
be an admissible exhaus-
tion of M A ) , w.l.o.g. we can assume that U1 c K1.
327
Riemonn algebras Suppose that cp
E
yg
and since the set of
21Kn Is dense in 3K n, the strong boundary points of ^A lies dense in Kn
Kn
for all n
E
N. Since
A
yAKn by (1.3.12) we find for each n c N an element gn
Hence i(gn)=fgn tends t o zero for n ->
E
A such that
Q).Since i is a linear homeo-
morphism this implies that gn tends t o zero f o r n + Q),a contradiction t o
ll$nllKn = 1 for
all n
E
N. Hence there is m
c
N such that
A E m
Set Kn = Kn+,
Km\yAK,. for a l l n
c
N.
0
(19.5.3) Theorem. Let A be a uF-algebra, and l e t cp
c
M(A) be a
point which is not isolated in M(A). Suppose that cp has a compact neighbourhood in M(A), and that ker cp is a principal ideal, generated by f
E
A. Then there exist an open set V
hood U of cp in M(A) such that
?:
U ->
c
C and an open neighbour-
V is a homeomorphism and
the map A
Hol(V) ->
,A ,
h ->
n
hof ,
defines a topological a1gebra homomorphism. Proof. According t o (19.5.2) there is a compact neighbourhood K of cp in M(A)
cp
E
- w.1.o.g.
A
we can assume that K is A-convex
K\Y%~.
This implies
(*I
vc?)nyhAK=O.
Clearly the ideal
?lK.hAK lies dense in
(ker tpIK = tg
A E
A :,
cp(g)=Ol.
By (*I and lemma (19.5.1) we have in fact
- such that
320
Chapter 19
A
So we can apply Gleason's theorem (1.5.5) t o the uB-algebra A ,,
.,1
A
and f
cp
It follows that there are an open set V c C and an open
neighbourhood U of cp in M($,)=K 1)
?:
such that
V Is a homeomorphism
U ->
and ii) t o ? - '
a
H ~ I ( V )for a l l g
A
A, ->
A .,
assume that U i s a hemlcompact and 3-
By (4.3.7) we can w.1.o.g. convex set. 1.e.
A
M(3,) = U by (4.3.4)iii). Hol (V), g ->
It follows that the map
CO?-'.
is a continuous and lnjectlve algebra homomorphlsm. By (6.1.2)
this
map Is even surjective and our assertion follows from the open mapping theorem.
0
Remark. Note that in general (19.5.3) becomes false if cp has no compact neighbowhood. In example (19.4.3) ker cp = (zl) for p=(O,O) and the f i r s t coordinate function, cf. (19.4.3)vii) neighbourhood U of o, such that
tl
, but there Is no
is injective on U or such that
2,
is a Stein algebra. (19.5.4) Theorem. Let A
$
C({pl) be a uF-algebra with locally com-
pact and connected spectrum M(A). Then the following statements are equivalent: I) A is algebraically and topologically Isomorphic to Hol(X). X a Rlemann surface; ill ker p is a principal Ideal for a l l cp c M(A).
Proof. 11)
4
1) Let cp s M(A) be a point with ker cp
= (f 1. Choose an P
open neighbourhood U of p in M(A) and an open set V
c C accordcp ing t o (19.5.3). Now we conclude as in the proof of (17.1.6) that the
cp
329
Rlemann algebras family (Up.fp.Vp
defines an atlas on M(A) such that M(A)
becomes a Riemann surface and such that
ill
4
I) This follows by [FOR 13, Satz 5.4.
^A = Hol(M(A1). 0
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
331
APPENDIX A SUBHARMONIC FUNCTIONS, POISSON INTEGRAL
We c o l l e c t some results which are needed in the t e x t . For the proofs and further results cf. for example the books of Narasimhan [NAR
11
and Garnett [GAR]. A.l Definition. Let X be a metric space, and l e t u: X ->
RU{-m) be
a map. Then u is called upper semi-continuous (usc.) if. for any
X
c
R. the set tx
c
x: u(x)
< XI
is open in X. A.2 Let X be a metric space, and l e t u be an
USC.
function on X.
Suppose that u is bounded above. Then there exists a sequence of continuous functions on X such that i un(x) f o r a l l nkl, x 'n+l (XI
6
X
and un(x) ->
A.3 Let G
c
u(x) as n -*
a.
C be an open set. Denote by C 2( G I the set of a l l twice
continuously differentiable complex-valued functions on G. Definition. We say that u
-d2U + dx2
d2u dy2
We remark that i f f
E
E
C 2 (GI is harmonic if
=OonG.
Hoi(G), then real- and imaginary part of f are
Appendix A
332
harmonic functions on G. Vice versa if f is a harmonic function on an open disc D c C, then there exists g
E
Hol(D) such that Re g = f on
D, where Re g denotes the real part of g.
A.4 Harmonic functions satisfy the mean value property: If f is harmonic on the open set G and the disc
{z: ia-zirR1, R>O, i s contained
in G, then f(a+Rexp(it)) dt.
r is a closed disc in C and f is a continuous function on dn, the boundary of n,then there exists a continuous function h on 16, A S If
which is harmonic on the open disc D, such that h l a E = f. Combining this result with A.3 it is easy t o show that f o r each realvalued function f
E
CCdn and each k
L
N there exists a polynomial pk
such that Ilf-Re PkllaE < l / k .
A.6 Definition. Let u be an
USC.
function on an open set G
c
C. Then
u i s called subharmonic on G provided that the following condition is satisfied: Let U be a relatively compact open subset of G, and l e t h be a continuous real-valued function on u(z)rh(z) for a l l z
E
uswhich i s harmonic on U. Then i f
dU we have u(z)rh(z) for a l l z
A.7 A theorem o f Littlewood states that if u is an an open set G
c
E
U.
USC.
C then u is subharmonic, if for every a
function on E
G, there
exists a sequence (rnInof positive numbers such that rn -> n ->
= and u(a) r 1/2x r u ( a + r n e x p ( i t ) ) d t f o r a l l nkl.
0 as
333
Subharmonic functions
A.8 The next theorem is due to Hartogs, for a proof see [AUP 2 1 , ~ .
174: Let D
c
C be an open disc, and l e t f: D ->
C be a bounded function
such that logif-ai is subharmonic on D for every a
c
C. Then either
f or the conjugate o f f is holomorphic on D. A.9 We now consider the Poisson kernel for the open unit disc D. Definition. We define the Poisson kernel for D t o be the function
D ->
(1-r 2 )/(l+r2 -2rcos(t)) =
R, rexp(it1 ->
A.10 We collect some properties of P. First note that P(z)>O for a l l
z
c
D. Furthermore we have dt = 1. Osr
E
h( t o ) as z ->
exp(ito).
Hol(D) be a bounded function. Then for almost a l l
[ 0 , 2 x ] the non-tangential limit
Appendix A
334
f*(exp(it)) =
Ii m f(z) z->exp ( it 1
exists, i.e. the limit exists if z approaches exp(it1 through the angle between two rays emanating from exp(it) which are not tangential to the unit circle and which approach exp(it) through D. A.13 Let f, f* be as In A.12, then
A.14 Definition. I) Let G c Cn be an open set, and l e t f:G -> be an
USC.
function. We say that f i s plurisubharmonic if for each
complex line L = {az+b)
{z
RU{-mI
E
c
C". the function
C: az+b s G I ->
RU{-mI, z ->
f(az+b).
is subharmonic. ill A set E
c
G is called pluripolar i f there exists a plurisubharmonic
function f on G. f
*
-QD,
such that f ( x ) = -a for a l l x
Q
E.
Remark. I f E i s a pluripolar set, then X2n(E) = 0, where X2n denotes the Lebesgue maesure In R2n, cf. [G/L].
p. 234.
335
APPENDIX B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
We state three theorems which we often used in this book. 8.1 Open mapping theorem. If E, F are Frechet spaces and
T: E ->
F i s a continuous, linear and surjective mapping, then T is
an open mapping, 1.e. T(U) is open in F if U is open in E. I n particular T is a homeomorphism if T is bijective. 8.2 Closed graph theorem. If E, F are Frechet spaces and
T: E ->
F is a linear mapping, then T is continuous if its graph
{(x,T(x)): x c E l is closed in ExF. 8.3 A subset E of a topological space X is called nowhere dense i f Interior
= 0 , where
denotes the closure o f E.
Baire category theorem. Let X be a complete metrizable space. Then the countable union of nowhere dense subsets of X contains no interior point. Equlvalentlyi Let (Ul)i be a sequence of dense open subsets of X. Then
nui Is
a dense subset of X.
336
LIST OF S Y M B O L S C , R, N, complex, real, natural numbers
No = NU{O) Re z, Im z denote the real resp. the imaglnary part of a point z
dK denotes the boundary,
denotes the closure of a set,
Ck([O,ll),
C(K), P(K1, R(K), 4
d b ) , B'l,
5
r(bL 7
M(B), ker cp,
6.8,9
R, 11 n(B), 13 (B,K), 15 rad A, 15 O(fl,..fr),
17
YB, 20 Hol(G),H(S), 26
dz, a 'dzj , 3 4
Ilm En, 8 4