Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

TOWARDS NEW THERAPIES FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE Edited by David I. Finkelstein Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Dis...

Author: David I. Finkelstein

12 downloads 2241 Views 9MB Size Report

This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form

DOWNLOAD PDF

TOWARDS NEW THERAPIES FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE Edited by David I. Finkelstein

Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease Edited by David I. Finkelstein

Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2011 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which permits to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work in any medium, so long as the original work is properly cited. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. As for readers, this license allows users to download, copy and build upon published chapters even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. Notice Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of information contained in the published chapters. The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book. Publishing Process Manager Silvia Vlase Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic Cover Designer Jan Hyrat Image Copyright GSPhotography, 2011. Used under license from Shutterstock.com First published October, 2011 Printed in Croatia A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com Additional hard copies can be obtained from [email protected]

Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease, Edited by David I. Finkelstein p. cm. ISBN 978-953-307-463-4

free online editions of InTech Books and Journals can be found at www.intechopen.com

Contents Preface IX Part 1

Issues Regarding Current Human Therapies

Chapter 1

Controversial Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease 3 Shin-Yuan Chen, Sheng-Tzung Tsai and Sheng-Huang Lin

Chapter 2

Cost and Efficacy of Therapies for Advanced Parkinson's Disease 21 Francesc Valldeoriola

Chapter 3

Botulinum A Toxin Intravesical Injections in the Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder in Patients with Parkinson's Disease 39 Antonella Giannantoni, Silvia Proietti, Antonella Conte, Massimo Porena and Alfredo Berardelli

Part 2

Models of Disease

55

Chapter 4

Alpha-Synuclein and the Immune Response in Parkinson’s Disease 57 Cintia Roodveldt, Adahir Labrador-Garrido, Guillermo Izquierdo and David Pozo

Chapter 5

The Knoll-Concept to Decrease the Prevalence of Parkinson’s Disease 77 Ildikó Miklya

Chapter 6

Utility of Organotypic Slices in Parkinson's Disease Research 101 Fabio Cavaliere and Carlos Matute

1

VI

Contents

Part 3

Identified Targets and Growth Factors

113

Chapter 7

Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Parkinson’s Disease 115 Rajeswara Babu Mythri, G. Harish, N. Raghunath and M.M. Srinivas Bharath

Chapter 8

Inhibition of Tau Phosphorylation as a Potential Strategy in Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease 151 Wang Wenya

Chapter 9

The Protective Effects of Pre-Treatment with Glutamate Metabotropic Receptor Agonists on the Development of Parkinsonian Movements Munir Qazzaz, Rateb M. Husein, Munther Metani and Abdul-Salam Abdul-Ghani

Chapter 10

GDNF and PD: Less Common Points of View 175 Ana Saavedra and Graça Baltazar

Chapter 11

The Potential of Neurotrophic Factors for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease 217 Aideen M. Sullivan and André Toulouse

Part 4

Gene Therapies

165

253

Chapter 12

Gene Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease 255 Michael Douglas and Jonathan Hazlehurst

Chapter 13

Gene Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Towards Non Invasive Approaches 269 Manuel Rodríguez, José M. Brito-Armas and Rafael Castro

Chapter 14

Epigenetic Modulation of Adenosine A2A Receptor: A Putative Therapeutical Tool for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease 295 Marta Barrachina, Mairena Martín, Francisco Ciruela and Isidre Ferrer

Part 5

Cell Therapies

313

Chapter 15

1980-2011: Parkinson's Disease and Advance in Stem Cell Research 315 Lidia Cova and Marie-Therese Armentero

Chapter 16

Cell Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: Status and Perspectives 343 Pia Jensen, Christina Krabbe and Morten Meyer

Contents

Chapter 17

Transplantation of Foetal Ventral Mesencephalic Grafts in Parkinson’s Disease: A Still Evolving Concept with New Regulatory Challenges 379 Sven Möllers, Máté Döbrössy and Guido Nikkhah

VII

Preface The current research investigating new ways to treat Parkinson’s disease (PD) is taking many directions. Current therapies successfully ameliorate the symptoms of the disease but the course of the disease appears to be unperturbed. This book is intended for the clinician or scientist looking towards the future. The brief outline of the book is as follows. Chapter 1 explores the issues surrounding the application of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS), for PD has been shown to induce dramatic and stable long-term improvement of patients’ motor symptoms. However some of the motor symptoms, and most of the non-motor symptoms, may not be improved by STN-DBS, and may even deteriorate after surgery. Even after the successful introduction of STNDBS as a treatment for PD, controversy still exists and this chapter examines a variety of issues: patient selection criteria, the anatomical target, imaging, targeting methods, microelectrode recordings, and anesthetic procedures. Chapter 2 discusses the economic burden of PD. The cost of therapies has become and will increasingly become a very important topic for governments and the health industry. From the perspective of a general neurologist, health economics can appear not be a priority, however it is a growing topic in most modern healthcare systems. Additional demands are being made by health policy decision makers, who can influence medical decisions through coverage and reimbursement policies. Physicians and other professional caregivers increasingly must consider the economic implications of their decisions. Chapter 3, proposes that infusion of apomorphine is a good therapeutic option, rapidly stimulating receptors, thereby assisting in the management of motor fluctuations in the advanced phase of the disease. Apomorphine has the added advantage as it is effective as a rescue therapy that can be administered with a penject. Chapter 4 examines the role of alpha-synuclein and the Immune Response in PD. This chapter proposes mechanisms through which alpha-synuclein might be affecting the immune system that appear not to be just a consequence of disease progression, but to actively contribute to the delicate balance between neuroprotection and neurotoxicity that ultimately underlies a given stage of disease.

X

Preface

Chapter 5 describes the investigations of Joseph Knoll in the early 1960’s that resulted in the development deprenyl a monoamine oxidase (MAO-B) inhibitor. The chapter reviews extensive studies and potential uses of the MAO-B inhibitors. The author proposes that the concept of the prophylactic use of deprenyl proposed by Knoll, may decrease the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases, such as, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. In Chapter 6 the authors review and describe the use of organotypic cultures as a model to study molecular mechanisms of PD as well as the use as a tool for preclinical studies of pharmacological and cell therapy treatment. It is proposed that disease can be modelled by application of drugs, toxins or by various transfection systems. Various treatment options can also be explored in this versatile system. In Chapter 7 the authors present the view that polyphenols may meet the challenge for novel molecules that could simultaneously target multiple PD pathways without significant side-effects, be non-toxic at higher concentrations and have the ability to cross the blood-brain. Polyphenols are derived from various plant sources. Chapter 8: microtubule-associated protein tau has risk alleles for PD, and mutations that cause brain degenerative diseases termed tauopathies. Aggregated phosphorylated tau forms neurofibrillary tangles in these pathologies. This chapter identifies the inhibition of Tau phosphorylation as a potential strategy in treating PD. Chapter 9: The subcortical nuclei of the basal ganglia are of great importance in initiation of normal body motor activities. Excitatory amino acids play an important role in these normal activities of these nuclei but dysfunction of the transmitter system has been implicated in some neurodegenerative diseases. In this chapter the authors pre-treat animals with glutamate metabotropic receptor agonists prevent the development 6-OHDA induced Parkinsonian movements. The authors suggest that the glutamate is potential target for investigations into new therapies for PD. Chapter 10: Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is considered a strong survival factor for dopaminergic neurons. This has led to the proposed use of GDNF as a potential therapy to slow down or even reverse neurodegeneration in PD. In this chapter the authors explore less common perspectives and alternative therapeutic approaches in PD. They believe that this chapter may draw attention to new directions of GDNF research. The authors of Chapter 11 express the views that despite the recent disappointing results in clinical trials, there remains an optimism that neurotrophic factors will prove to be useful in PD therapy. Optimisation of delivery methods is needed, and vital information is being gleaned from studies in animal models of PD. For future clinical trials, optimisation of surgical and infusion protocols, as well as careful patient selection, will be critical to advance this promising therapeutic approach. Chapters 12 and 13 consider gene therapy to be one of the most promising approaches to develop an effective treatment for PD. The existence of blood brain barrier and the

Preface

ability to control gene expression are currently limitations of this technology. Studies in animals studies have been developing the technologies to regulate gene expression and to deliver the materials in the periphery and have the product expressed in the neurons. These chapters consider viral and non viral ways of delivering the genes to the brain. In Chapter 14 the authors propose the use of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM, a methyl group donor molecule necessary for DNA methylation) as an epigenetic tool to increase the expression of adenosine A2A receptors in PD. It has been proposed that the inactivation of A2A receptor enhances the affinity of D2R for dopamine, this being the probable mechanism underlying the dopaminergic like effect of A2AR antagonists in some patients. Chapters 15 and 16 investigate the prospects of implantation of dopaminergic neurons as a therapy that may reverse some of the central symptoms of PD. Over the last decades, approximately 400 PD patients have been grafted, with substantial motor improvements being reported particularly in younger patients. In these chapters the authors examine the historical approaches and what has been learnt from those as well as the current status. They discuss crucial issues that remain to be resolved to develop cell replacement into an effective and safe therapy. Once the technology for transplantation of tissues into people with PD, there will be a need to resolve the regulatory issues. Chapter 17 examines the technologies involved in the transplantation of foetal ventral mesencephalic grafts in people with PD and then goes on to examine the new regulatory challenges. This book is intended for researchers and clinicians interested in developing new and innovative therapies for Parkinson’s Disease. The editor would like to thank all the authors for their contributions in the book. Finally, gratitude should be expressed also to the team at InTech for the initiative and help in publishing this book.

Assoc. Prof. David I. Finkelstein The Mental Health Research Institute, The University of Melbourne Australia

XI

Part 1 Issues Regarding Current Human Therapies

1 Controversial Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Shin-Yuan Chen1,2, Sheng-Tzung Tsai2 and Sheng-Huang Lin3 1Division

of Functional Neuroscience, of Neurosurgery 3Neurology, Neuro-Medical Scientific Center Tzu Chi General Hospital / Tzu Chi University, Hualien Taiwan 2Department

1. Introduction Since 1992, the application of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been shown to induce dramatic and stable long-term improvement of patients’ motor symptoms. However, some of the motor symptoms, and most of the non-motor symptoms, may not be improved by STN-DBS; in fact, they may deteriorate after surgery. Even after the successful introduction of STN-DBS as a treatment for PD, controversy still exists over a variety of issues: patient selection criteria, the anatomical target such as STN or globus pallidus (GPi), targeting methods (MRI alone, CT scan with image fusion, or ventriculography), microelectrode recordings (yes/no), and anesthetic procedures (awake with sedative or under general anesthesia). In this chapter we will discuss these controversial issues by integrating our experience with a review of the literature.

2. Patient selection for deep brain stimulation (DBS) A successful DBS surgery may involve several surgical procedures, but patient selection is always a key issue to address because it contributes to whether there is a good surgical outcome. In 1992, a common evaluation protocol for PD was suggested by the the Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantations(CAPIT) committee, which allowed for comparisons between different study groups. For example, they defined “offmedication” and “on-medication” status. The core assessment methodologies of this protocol include the following: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr Staging, Dyskinesia Rating Scale, Self-reporting diary, and timed test for bradykinesia [1]. In 1996, the Network for European CNS Transplantation and Restoration (NECTAR), developed a new Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in PD (CAPSIT-PD) and gave advice to add evaluations for cognitive function and quality of life [2]. Since then, thousands of papers have been published in the fields of PD and DBS, and clinicians and researchers have paid attention to the issue of patient selection in order to ensure a good outcome [3-9].

4

Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

In 2009, Australia offered a referral guideline for neurologists to establish methods for enrolling ideal PD candidates for DBS. In 2010, consensus was reached for DBS in PD. With respect to patient selection, these experts stated that, “...Best results have been reported in patients with advanced PD and (1) levodopa response, (2) younger age, (3) no or few axial non–LD-responsive motor symptoms, (4) no or very mild cognitive impairment, and (5) absence of or well controlled psychiatric disease” [10]. The ideal candidate has all of the above components; however, even with these guidelines, pitfalls and controversy still exist. Diagnosis It is important to differentiate PD from atypical parkinsonism to ensure a good long-term outcome of STN-DBS, but it can be hard to discriminate between them because they share clinical features such as bradykinesia, rigidity and tremor. It is especially difficult when the disease is in its early stage and l-dopa responsiveness is moderate. Poor prognostic factors for STN-DBS can be the following: a poor response to l-dopa, the additional presence of pyramidal or cerebellar signs (e.g., ataxia), an early presentation of posture instability and autonomic failure (e.g., hypotension), within 5 years of onset, a nontremor dominant presentation, and persistent unilateral disease [11-12]. The UK Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria for PD is recommended for assessing all surgical candidates, although it should be noted that the early symptoms of PD, such as hyposmia, REM sleep behavioral disorders, constipation and depression may precede the obvious motor symptoms and are not included on the list [13]. The use of Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) staging and the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a basic requirement for evaluating patients before starting any PD intervention. In 2007, the revising process for the UPDRS was started by a task force of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS), which is aimed at incorporating more detail on non-motor symptoms, but it has not yet been published [14-17]. Age at time of surgery Age is a confounding factor and has a negative correlation with STN-DBS outcome. A trend for greater long-term STN-DBS improvements on the UPDRS part II and part III measures in younger patients has been shown; however, it is also effective in elderly patients, though the benefits may persist for only a short period of time [18]. Most studies also have shown a negative correlation with motor outcome, non-motor outcome (e.g., apathy and depression) and quality of life upon long-term follow-up [18-22]. While the cut-off age proposed by most studies is 70 years old, the benefits and risks of surgery should be weighed to meet the expectations of the patient and the care giver. Disease duration and severity Advanced PD patients with obvious medication side effects of motor fluctuation and/or dyskinesia would be good candidates for DBS. However, an H&Y Stage 1 patient with tremor dominant symptoms who is within 5 years of onset can also be a good candidate for DBS and show a substantial benefit, as can a bed-ridden Stage 5 patient. Because there have been no proven neuroprotective effects of DBS, the recommendation for an earlier intervention is based on quality of life, which will improve substantially in domains related to movement disorders and general health [23]. Though some authors postulate that disease severity may be correlated with STN-DBS outcome, a study of ours found that the outcome was not correlated with H&Y staging or disease duration [18].

Controversial Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

5

Levodopa (LD) responsiveness LD responsiveness, as measured by the UPDRS part III, may predict the motor outcome of STN-DBS in a PD patient with disabling motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. In fact, this is true for all cardinal symptoms (except LD refractory tremor) that can be well controlled by STN-DBS. Pre-operative LD responsiveness may only lead to consistent UPDRS part III improvement from STN-DBS at 3 months, and its predictive value may not be valid for long-term follow-up due to co-morbid non-motor symptoms. The pre-operative LD responsiveness of tremor and axial symptoms are stable predictors for the long-term effect of DBS [18]. Cognitive, psychiatric, and other non-motor symptoms Non-motor symptoms in PD patients are a significant source of disability and impairment in the performance of activities of daily living. The non-motor symptoms of PD include dementia, sleep disorders, and dysautonomia along with neuropsychiatric and sensory complaints. Most centers exclude PD patients with dementia and neuropsychiatric symptoms from STN-DBS. As for sleep disorders and sensory complaints, some reports have shown improvement after treatment when these symptoms are present. More generally, normal pre-operative cognitive functioning is positively correlated with postoperative improvement in UPDRS part III at a long-term follow-up [18]. STN-DBS may still lead to a decline in cognitive and executive function even with strict inclusion criteria [24]; however, it has been suggested that sub-optimal contact stimulation (caused by the small volume of STN) is more strongly correlated with post-operative psychiatric events. Although there are still debates about post-operative psychiatric events, the possibility of increased depression and suicide risk prompts us to evaluate the patient’s psychological function in detail prior to the operation.

3. STN-DBS versus GPi-DBS: Which target is better for PD patients? STN-DBS is the current gold-standard surgical treatment in PD, but a high occurrence of adverse effects and neuropsychological problems following STN-DBS stimulation cause some centers to study alternative surgical targets, such as the GPi. The issues to consider when choosing a target for DBS include the following: a different set of patient selection criteria, the amount of levodopa being used, the extent of levodopa-related dyskinesia, battery life and surgeon preference. In randomized trials, DBS has been demonstrated to be superior to the best knownmedical treatment for advanced PD. Under most circumstances, STN is the chosen target rather than GPi. Although several reports have shown that the efficacy of pallidal stimulation decreases over the long-term follow up [25], others have demonstrated a persistent benefit from pallidal stimulation for up to 3 years [26]. In 2005, the first randomized trial was published by Anderson and colleagues, and their patients showed a similar improvement in motor function from subthalamic and pallidal stimulation [27]. Still, deciding which target is best is a topic still subject to debate, and several points of view need to be considered. The effect of target on motor function PD is characterized by disabling motor symptoms. Previous reports seem to have concluded that STN-DBS improves more than GPi-DBS in UPDRS part III (motor) [26-28]. However, a

6


recent large randomized trial showed a similar improvement from either STN or GPi stimulation [29]. It should be noted that the follow-up duration in this study was only 24 months and GPi might show less of a benefit after a longer period of time [25, 30]. The effect of target on non-motor symptoms Non-motor symptoms of PD have received more attention in recent years and seem to play a pivotal role in the change in quality of life caused by the amelioration of motor disabilities through medical or surgical treatment [31]. An increased percentage of post-stimulation behavioral and cognitive complications is still a major concern for STN-DBS [27, 32-33] as it is not conclusively known whether DBS causes a change in these non-motor symptoms. Although a recent randomized trial comparing PD patients undergoing STN stimulation to those who only received the best medication-based treatment showed no significant differences [34], a second study comparing STN stimulation with GPi did show that depression was worse in those who received STN-DBS [29]. This finding reminds us that non-motor symptoms should be considered during target selection for patients who plan to receive electrode implantation. The effect of target on reducing medication dosages One of the main reasons that pallidal stimulation has not become popular may be that it limits the amount one can decrease medication dosages. Most studies have shown that patients who undergo STN stimulation require a lower dose of dopaminergic medication than those who undergo GPi stimulation [28-29]. This effect is probably due to different mechanisms of action underlying the STN and GPi response to electrical current. It has been suggested that STN stimulation reverses the sensitization phenomenon that underpins levodopa induced dyskinesia (LID) [35]. In fact, STN stimulation per se cannot ameliorate LID without decreasing dopaminergic medication[36]. Contrary to this, GPi stimulation may itself decrease the severity of LID [37]. The interaction between STN and GPi activity has been suggested to play a major role in the pathogenesis of dyskinesia, and the amelioration of stimulation-related dyskinesia through proximal contact (i.e., stimulating pallido-subthalamic fibers) shown in previous reports and our own young onset PD (YOPD) patients suggests a more beneficial effect of GPi than STN in ameliorating treatment-related dyskinesia. Overall, most comparative studies showed that the daily dosage of levodopa can be reduced only in an STN-DBS group [26]. The effect of target on battery life The stimulation amplitude within the implantable pulse generator (IPG) is one significant determinant of battery life. In a multicenter study, Rodriguez-Oroz and colleagues found a similar amplitude for patients undergoing STN and GPi stimulation for 3 to 4 years [26]. However, most studies (including one large randomized trial) have shown that STN stimulation requires significantly less electrical power around 0.7~0.8 V and a pulse width of 20 μsec [38]. These parameters allow patients to receive STN stimulation for a longer period of time between pulse-generator replacements as compared to GPi stimulation. Most cost-effectiveness studies also have confirmed this benefit of STN stimulation over solely medication-based treatment for advanced PD. For countries where DBS devices are not reimbursed by health insurance, such as Taiwan, the replacement of the IPG will be a large burden for most patients. Larger amplitudes and pulse widths for GPi stimulation may lead to more frequent battery replacement and more device-related complications [30]. Improving future IPG technology may alleviate this economic consideration.


7

Adverse effects of target Adverse effects of stimulation in general include cognitive decline, verbal fluency deterioration, gait disorders and mood instability (in the form of compulsiveness or depression). Most studies show that the adverse effects of stimulation are more common in STN-DBS [27, 29]. In the COMPARE trial, which was a prospective randomized trial, it was shown that under optimal conditions there was no significant difference in the incidence of mood or cognitive alteration following DBS implantation. However, a sub-scale analysis of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale showed that there was more “anger” after STN-DBS. Another randomized trial also has suggested that depression may be worse after subthalamic stimulation but improved after pallidal stimulation. The volume of the STN (~158 mm3) is much smaller than the GPi (~478 mm3) nucleus. Moreover, the sub-territory within the STN nucleus and surrounding fibers involve motor, associative and limbic circuitry that are more compact and close together. Therefore, a suboptimal electrode placement or electrical-current perturbation is more often going to be associated with STN stimulation, which may lead to mood changes and verbal fluency dysfunction. Although a randomized control trial has shown a comparable benefit for GPi stimulation compared to STN stimulation, longer follow-up studies are needed to decide which target is preferable for each patient. We have made a comparison of the targets in Table 1. Clinical trials are ongoing for alternative targets in the pedunculopontine nucleus, radiation prelemniscalis, and caudal zona incerta, and stimulation on these targets may improve symptoms that are currently unresponsive to treatment with either levodopa or STN stimulation. STN stimulation

GPi stimulation

Motor improvement

50~60%, coherent [29, 34]

27~50%, variable in long-term [29, 72]

Mood effect

higher, esp. suboptimal contact

seems unchanged

LEDD reduction

greater reduction (31.5%)

less reduction (17.8%)

Battery life

lower amplitude

higher amplitude

General adverse effect 56%

51%

Table 1. Comparison of STN and GPi stimulation

4. Targeting methods in DBS: MRI alone versus CT scan fused with MRI and/or ventriculography There are a number of targeting methods used in DBS. Which method is used depends on the facilities of the institution and the familiarity of the surgeon with a given procedure. Most practicing centers use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the only tool for targeting, but others use image fusion techniques to co-register MRI and computed tomography (CT) images, or intra-operative ventriculography, which is the traditional targeting method, for determining targeting accuracy. Below we compare these methods on acquisition time, procedure complexity, and ultimate accuracy.

8


The size of the STN is extremely small and it has an ovoid shape and oblique orientation [39]. The accuracy of DBS targeting may be one of the most important factor in surgical outcome because the position of the electrode determines the area across which the electrical current diffuses. Given that there are very few evidence-based studies that have directly compared the safety and effectiveness of the various imaging techniques, the best targeting method remains under debate. The methods include MRI, CT, ventriculography and various combinations thereof. Stereotactic targeting with ventriculography is the traditional method for stereotactic functional neurosurgery that has been in use for decades. While it is still used by some teams, there are concerns over its invasiveness and serious complications, such as CSF leakage and intracranial hemorrhage, which are major obstacles for most functional neurosurgeons [40]. The method involves injecting a contrast medium into the right frontal horn and acquiring representative images to determine the location of the anterior commissure and posterior commissure, which then can be used to calculate various target coordinates [41]. Compared with targeting methods that may have higher accuracy (e.g., ventriculography), targeting with MRI can be affected by the anterior displacement of the anterior commissure (AC), which elongates anterior commissure - posterior commissure (AC-PC) length [40]. A magnetic field can cause this nonlinear distortion, especially in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axis. Most centers only use MRI for targeting while others use image fusion techniques to coregister MRI and CT scans. MRI-directed targeting for STN-DBS has proven to be a simple yet accurate method in most DBS practicing centers; it has been a standard procedure in our hospital since 2002 [42]. The advantages of MRI includes better demarcation of deep nuclei (e.g., the red and subthalamic nucleus) as references for targeting, better visualization of critical structures that can prevent inadvertent injury (e.g., lateral ventricles and vasculatures within sulci) and a clear delineation of simulating trajectory for electrode. There are three current strategies to localize the coordinates of targets on stereotactic MRI. In direct targeting, the STN is located on MRI without any references, which is inherently prone to errors. The vague configuration of the STN makes determining the STN boundaries on a T2-weighted MR image rely on the subjective visual impression of the neurosurgeon. An indirect method of targeting uses the AC and PC as reference points, thereby avoiding bias when differentiating the border between the STN and substantia nigra, which has been shown to be more accurate than direct targeting. Targeting based on the red nucleus (RN) has not only the same accuracy as indirect targeting but also less variance, which indicates greater precision across subjects (Fig. 1) [43]. Although MRI-based targeting is becoming more popular, the potential distortion of the STN that a nonlinear magnetic field can induce is still a major concern. To counter this, some groups still use ventriculography which reliably identifies the AC-PC for indirect targeting methods using intraventricular landmarks. Although the AC-PC and the target itself (e.g., the STN) are poorly visualized on CT, MRI fused to stereotactic CT are believed to combine the advantages of both modalities, thereby increasing the spatial validity of the image and ensuring a more accurate localization, which continues to improve as fusion technology improves [44]. In our experience, stereotactic CT fused to MRI during DBS surgery can allow for a longer microelectrode recording length of STN and fewer recording tracts (Fig. 2). This indirectly demonstrates that stereotactic CT may have a better pre-operative targeting ability leading to the stimulation of optimal anatomical sites. It should be noted that it may be difficult for advanced PD patients to


9

Fig. 1. Direct targeting using MR images is depicted. The target coordinates for the tip of the permanent implantable electrode are at the intersection of the perpendicular lines. The horizontal line is located along the anterior border of the red nucleus. The longitudinal lines are at 2-mm intervals from the lateral border of the red nucleus. Axial section taken at the level of the superior colliculus, just below the lowest border of the STN (4.5 mm below the mid–commissural point). 1= red nucleus; 2=substantia nigra reticulata; 3=crus cerebri. undergo MRI with a stereotactic frame, especially in an un-medicated state where obvious tremors or severe stoop posture will be present. There is a risk for these patients when sedated in the MRI suite in an attempt to quell the severe tremor because the scanning time for MRI may take more than 20 minutes. For this reason, some centers use a specific protocol for direct visualization of the STN in stereotactic MRI, which saves time [45]. At our institution, a stereotactic CT scan takes about 3 minutes, which is far below the average MRI acquisition time of 20-25 minutes for most protocols. With advances in imaging technology, we may be able to define the border of the STN directly using MRI in the future and eliminate the inherent error of nonlinear MRI distortion.

10


Fig. 2. (A) Stereotactic axial computed tomography (CT) images for fiducial registration. (B) Nonfused axial magnetic resonance image (MRI) T1 images and stereotactic CT images. (C) Co-registered Schaltenbran-Wahren atlas for red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus (STN) target planning simulation. (D) Fused axial MRI T2 and CT images, spyglass with visualization of red nucleus (thin arrow) and STN (thick arrow).


11

5. The necessity of microelectrode recording in STN-DBS surgery Precise results in DBS surgery are traditionally achieved by MRI targeting followed by electrophysiological confirmation with microelectrode recording (MER) [46]. MRI scans are not always of sufficient quality to identify the target structure and are always susceptible to image distortion. MER can localize the target with more precision when MRI targeting is not precise enough. MER is used in DBS surgery to identify the target’s structural border, the subdivisions of the targeted structure and the outlines of its three-dimensional shape. MRI and MER are complementary in DBS surgery [47]; however, there are disadvantages of MER in DBS surgery, including the following: 1) it is time consuming, 2) it may increase the risk of a hemorrhage complication and 3) it is not always useful, for example when the target is located in white matter or has a large and distinct boundary that can be easily visualized with MRI. Here we will focus on whether MER is necessary in STN-DBS surgery for treating PD. Direct MRI targeting without MER is possible in STN-DBS surgery with the recent advances in high-resolution MRI (field strength of 3-Tesla or more) and advanced image processing techniques. However, there is a paucity of publications that report on the use of stereotactic MRI for direct visualization in STN-DBS surgery without MER [48]. Recently, a large series of STN-DBS without MER has been published by Foltynie et al. [49]. We compared their results with those of Krack et al [50], who performed STN-DBS with MER which recruited from a single center. Table 2 compares the demographic data of the studies’ patients, effect of DBS and complications of surgery. The baseline data of the patients are comparable except that Krack’s sample size is less than Foltynie’s. However, we should note that Krack’s report is designed for long term follow-up (5 years later) and they recruited the first 49 STNDBS patients from their center. The effect of STN-DBS at a one-year follow-up was similar in the two studies. The DBS effect is better in Krack’s study but not significantly so. In terms of surgery-related adverse events, Krack showed greater transient confusion and intracerebral hemorrhage in their patients. Foltynie showed less transient confusion and no hemorrhage events. The risk of intracerebral hemorrhage inevitably increases with a greater number of micro- or DBS electrode penetration events [51-52]. Post-operative transient confusion in DBS surgery is common. The incidence of transient confusion in STN-DBS surgery is 15.6% [53]. This phenomenon is often attributed to a mild pneumocephalus that occurs during surgery. It is not a precisely understood phenomenon, but it occurs more frequently in older and cognitively disabled patients. The risk for and volume of pneumocephalus positively correlates with the amount of time the skull is open during surgery. MER may therefore increase the risk of pneumocephalus because it is time consuming. Based on the above comparison, the same therapeutic effect for patients can be achieved in STN-DBS with and without MER, but MER has more surgery-related adverse events. Others have reported that the use of MER improves the outcome of STN-DBS [42]. With the advancement of MRI technology and imaging processing, MRI-guided STN-DBS without MER may be an alternative surgical method for advanced PD patients. The reports of MRIguided STN-DBS are sparse; therefore, we cannot conclude that this surgical method is better than STN-DBS with MER. Overall, the necessity of MER in STN-DBS surgery remains controversial.

12


With MER (Krack et al)

Without MER (Foltynie et al)

Demographic data

Mean

± SD

Mean

Sex (no. of patients)

24 men

/ 25 women

49 men / 30 women

Age at surgery

55.0

± 7.5 (34-68)

57.3

± 7.7 (34.5-70.2)

Duration of disease

14.6

± 5.0

13.4

± 7.0

L-dopa equivalent dose

1409.0

± 605.0

1620.0

± 641.0

UPDRS III motor scores Baseline off-medication

55.7

± 11.9

51.5

± 14.9

UPDRS III motor scores One year after operation on-stimulation, off-medication

19.0

± 11.1

23.8

± 11.2

UPDRS III motor scores One year after operation on-stimulation, on-medication

11.4

± 8.9

14.5

± 8.3

± SD

Effect of STN DBS

Adverse events related to procedure Intracerebral hemorrhage

2

0

Transient confusion

12

7

Seizures

2

2

Table 2. Comparison between DBS with and without MER

6. Anesthetic considerations in DBS: Awake versus general anesthesia Traditionally, DBS is an awake surgical procedure in order to allow electrophysiological mapping and stimulation testing to assess motor responses and potential side effects. However, PD patients with obvious “off-medication” symptoms of anxiety, painful dystonia, and respiratory distress may not be good candidates for the lengthy tolerating the surgical procedures while awake [54-57]. In this section, we will report our own experience with general anesthesia during DBS surgery with MER and compare it with data from awake procedures (see Table 3).

13


Operation procedures:

Awake DBS

General Anesthetic DBS

Patient’s condition

communicative and cooperative; Can tolerate severe off-symptoms

Anxious; Cannot tolerate severe off-symptoms, such as: pain, dystonia and/or respiratory difficulties

Anesthetic agents

None

Desflurane (Patient intubated under regular induction and muscle relaxant, keep Mac around 0.8~1.0) [54]

Sedative agents

propofol / remifentanil (intermittent use, e.g. during trephination)

None

MER signals

Yes

Yes

Passive movement-related MER signals

Yes

Yes

Test stimulation

Yes

No

Motor outcome

Good

Good

Surgical complication

Comparable

Comparable

Stimulation side effect

Lower

May be higher

Risk period

During surgery

Induction and extubation

Patient monitoring by anesthesiologist Yes

Yes

Mac: minimum alveolar concentration

Table 3. Comparison between awake DBS and general anesthetic DBS procedures Awake DBS procedures Most DBS centers prefer that their PD patients receive electrode implantation procedures in an awake state in order to retrieve sound electrophysiological signals from MER and to perform test stimulation. Time is crucial for a patient to tolerate the procedure while awake. Patel et al tried an MRI direct-targeting method with macro-stimulation alone. They conclude that without MER the procedure is more efficient and safe but still has a good outcome [58-59]. In the awake state, macro-stimulation is beneficial because it excludes the side effect from electrode stimulation [59]. Sedative agents are inevitable during awake procedures, especially during trephination. Propofol is popular during DBS procedures as a brief general anesthetic agent, but it may require full-time surveillance of the patient’s

14


airway and vital signs by an anesthesiologist. The function of the patient’s airway can be a severe problem in an advanced PD patient’s “off” state. MER has been shown to perform properly and without affecting the surgical outcome only when remifentanil was completely stopped and the dose of propofol was carefully monitored [52, 58, 60-61]. Duque et al reported a case with these same anesthetic agents using Bispectral Analysis of the Electroencephalogram (BIS) to monitor cortical activity in order to titrate the hypnotics, which may interfere with MER procedures. While this technique may be useful, it is not convenient [62]. General anesthetic DBS procedures A detailed MER mapping within the STN may lead to an optimal placement of DBS electrodes, but the drawbacks are the length of the procedure and that the patient must be kept awake during the procedure. Some patients with severe “off-medication” PD symptoms, such as major anxiety, poorly tolerated off-medication dystonia, or respiratory difficulties may refuse DBS or may be poor candidates for DBS in an awake state [55, 57]. STN-DBS during a state of general anesthesia may be another choice for those patients with advanced PD for whom symptoms are difficult to control with medication only. In patients with advanced PD who undergo STN-DBS while awake, test stimulation after the permanent electrode is implanted is helpful to confirm the electrode position. The test stimulation verifies the maximal clinical effects intraoperatively as well as the side effects of low voltage in the case that the electrode position was sub-optimal. Test stimulation in patients receiving a general anesthetic is controversial. Hertel et al. performed test stimulation to verify possible capsular effects when using low-voltage electrode stimulation, and the voltage causing the capsular effects may be incorrectly estimated if the excitability of the capsule has been decreased by general anesthesia. In our study, we did not perform test stimulation, but no patient suffered post-operative capsular effects because our selection criteria for the trajectory of electrode implantation chose the most appropriate track [54]. The knowledge of STN topography is crucial in general anesthesia DBS surgery; therefore, MER must be used as it is the only intra-operative tool to identify the STN, map its boundaries, and map its sensorimotor component through the detection of movementrelated neuronal firing [61, 63-65]. The role of anesthesiologist in DBS surgery Most anesthesiologists are treating intubated patients under general anesthesia and in awake procedures like DBS, it can be challenging to ensure neuronal firing on the one hand and monitor patient safety the other. Avoiding medications that may interfere with MER can negatively affect patient safety, especially when the patient is agitated by a prolonged DBS procedure. However, it also is difficult to maintain a secure airway if the patient is too deeply unconscious [66-67]. In hypertensive patients, the alpha-2 agonist dexmedetomidine has been suggested as an effective sedative agent that may provide the patient comfort and good blood-pressure control and yet still allow satisfactory MER mapping by the neurophysiologist [67]. Complications may still occur during awake DBS procedures. Deoganokar reported a case of venous air embolism in an elderly PD patient with a myocardial infarction [68]. Glossop and Dobbs also report two cases of coronary artery vasospasm during electrode implantation. Though these patients recovered, the authors suggest full monitoring by an anesthesiologist throughout the surgical procedures [69].


15

The effect of the anesthetic agent desflurane Desflurane (2,2,2-trifluoro-1-fluoroethyl-difluoromethyl ether) is a highly fluorinated methylethyl ether used for maintenance of a general anesthetic. It has the most rapid onset and offset of all of the volatile anesthetic drugs used for general anesthesia because of its low solubility in blood. It also is popular in neurosurgery because it can allow early extubation and facilitate early neurological evaluation [70-71]. MER also can be performed well at an anesthetic level of 0.8±0.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) [54].

7. Conclusion The subthalamic nucleus plays an important role in the functional control of motor activity in the indirect dopaminergic pathway of the basal ganglia. Twenty years after the first introduction of DBS to treat PD, it remains as an important alternative treatment to l-dopa, especially in the patient with motor fluctuation and obvious l-dopa related complication. Centers performing DBS may have different protocol according to their experiences and facilities. Controversial points exist inevitably, however, through proper patient selections, cooperation between multidisciplinary teams, and refine surgical techniques we can ensure a good outcome for DBS candidate.

8. Acknowledgment This work was supported by Master Cheng Yen, President of the Tzu-Chi Foundation, and Tzu-Chi General Hospital grant TCSP 0104.

9. References [1] Langston J, Widner H, Goetz C, Brooks D, Fahn S, Freeman T, Watts R. Core assessment program for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT). Mov Disord 1992;7(1):2-13. [2] Defer G, Widner H, Marie R, Remy P, Levivier M. Core assessment program for surgical interventional therapies in Parkinson's disease (CAPSIT-PD). Mov Disord 1999;14(4):572-84. [3] Moro E, Allert N, Eleopra R, Houeto J, Phan T, Stoevelaar H. A decision tool to support appropriate referral for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2009;256(1):83-8. [4] Yoshida F, Miyagi Y, Kishimoto J, Morioka T, Murakami N, Hashiguchi K, Samura K, Sakae N, Yamasaki R, Kawaguchi M, Sasaki T. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation does not cause deterioration of preexisting hallucinations in Parkinson's disease patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009;87(1):45-9. [5] Okun MS, Fernandez HH, Rodriguez RL, Foote KD. Identifying candidates for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: the role of the primary care physician. Geriatrics 2007;62(5):18-24. [6] Okun MS, Fernandez HH, Pedraza O, Misra M, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Tarsy D, Scollins L, Corapi K, Friehs GM, Grace J, Romrell J, Foote KD. Development and initial validation of a screening tool for Parkinson disease surgical candidates. Neurology 2004;63(1):161-3. [7] Amick M, Grace J. Deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: the role of neuropsychological assessment. Med Health R I 2006;89(4):130-3.

16


[8] Chang V, Chou K. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: patient selection and motor outcomes. Med Health R I 2006;89(4):142-4. [9] Lang AE, Widner H. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: Patient selection and evaluation. Movement Disorders 2002;17(S3):S94-S101. [10] Bronstein JM, Tagliati M, Alterman RL, Lozano AM, Volkmann J, Stefani A, Horak FB, Okun MS, Foote KD, Krack P, Pahwa R, Henderson JM, Hariz MI, Bakay RA, Rezai A, Marks WJ, Jr, Moro E, Vitek JL, Weaver FM, Gross RE, DeLong MR. Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Expert Consensus and Review of Key Issues. Arch Neurol 2010:archneurol.2010.260. [11] Williams DR, Warren JD, Lees AJ. Using the presence of visual hallucinations to differentiate Parkinson’s disease from atypical parkinsonism. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2008;79(6):652-5. [12] Kollensperger M, Geser F, Seppi K, Stampfer-Kountche... M, Sawires M, Scherfler C, Boesch S, Mueller J, Koukouni V, Quinn N, Pellecchia M, Barone P, Schimke N, Dodel R, Oertel W, Dupont E, Ostergaard K, Daniels C, Deuschl G, Gurevich T, Giladi N, Coelho M, Sampaio C, Nilsson C, Widner H, Sorbo F, Albanese A, Cardozo A, Tolosa E, Abele M, Klockgether T, Kamm C, Gasser T, Djaldetti R, Colosimo C, Meco G, Schrag A, Poewe W, Wenning G. Red flags for multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord 2008;23(8):1093-9. [13] Reichmann H. Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Neurodegener Dis 2010;7(5):284-90. [14] Zhao Y, Wee H, Chan Y, Seah S, Au W, Lau P, Pica E, Li S, Luo N, Tan L. Progression of Parkinson's disease as evaluated by Hoehn and Yahr stage transition times. Mov Disord 2010;25(6):702-8. [15] Goetz C, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins G, Counsell C, Giladi N, Holloway R, Moore C, Wenning G, Yahr M, Seidl L. Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2004;19(9):1020-8. [16] The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2003;18(7):738-50. [17] Goetz C, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins G, Stern M, Tilley B, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang A, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt P, Nyenhuis D, Olanow C, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi J, Van Hilten J, LaPelle N. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord 2007;22(1):41-7. [18] Tsai S, Lin S, Chou Y, Pan Y, Hung H, Li C, Lin S, Chen S. Prognostic factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a comparative study between shortand long-term effects. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009;87(4):241-8. [19] Romito L, Contarino M, Vanacore N, Bentivoglio A, Scerrati M, Albanese A. Replacement of dopaminergic medication with subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease: long-term observation. Mov Disord 2009;24(4):557-63. [20] Ory-Magne F, Brefel-Courbon C, Simonetta-Moreau M, Fabre N, Lotterie J, Chaynes P, Berry I, Lazorthes Y, Rascol O. Does ageing influence deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease? Mov Disord 2007;22(10):1457-63.


17

[21] Derost P-P, Ouchchane L, Morand D, Ulla M, Llorca P-M, Barget M, Debilly B, Lemaire J-J, Durif F. Is STN-DBS appropriate to treat severe Parkinson disease in an elderly population? Neurology 2007;68(17):1345-55. [22] Vesper J, Haak S, Ostertag C, Nikkhah G. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in elderly patients--analysis of outcome and complications. BMC Neurol 2007;7:7. [23] Ferrara J, Diamond A, Hunter C, Davidson A, Almaguer M, Jankovic J. Impact of STNDBS on life and health satisfaction in patients with Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2010;81(3):315-9. [24] York MK, Dulay M, Macias A, Levin HS, Grossman R, Simpson R, Jankovic J. Cognitive declines following bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2008;79(7):789-95. [25] Houeto JL, Bejjani PB, Damier P, Staedler C, Bonnet AM, Pidoux B, Dormont D, Cornu P, Agid Y. Failure of long-term pallidal stimulation corrected by subthalamic stimulation in PD. Neurology 2000;55(5):728-30. [26] Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Obeso JA, Lang AE, Houeto J-L, Pollak P, Rehncrona S, Kulisevsky J, Albanese A, Volkmann J, Hariz MI, Quinn NP, Speelman JD, Guridi J, Zamarbide I, Gironell A, Molet J, Pascual-Sedano B, Pidoux B, Bonnet AM, Agid Y, Xie J, Benabid A-L, Lozano AM, Saint-Cyr J, Romito L, Contarino MF, Scerrati M, Fraix V, Van Blercom N. Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up. Brain 2005;128(10):2240-9. [27] Anderson VC, Burchiel KJ, Hogarth P, Favre J, Hammerstad JP. Pallidal vs Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease. Arch Neurol 2005;62(4):55460. [28] Moro E, Lozano A, Pollak P, Agid Y, Rehncrona S, Volkmann J, Kulisevsky J, Obeso J, Albanese A, Hariz M, Quinn N, Speelman J, Benabid A, Fraix V, Mendes A, Welter M, Houeto J, Cornu P, Dormont D, Tornqvist A, Ekberg R, Schnitzler A, Timmermann L, Wojtecki L, Gironell A, Rodriguez-Oroz M, Guridi J, Bentivoglio A, Contarino M, Romito L, Scerrati M, Janssens M, Lang A. Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010;25(5):578-86. [29] Follett K, Weaver F, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Luo P, Marks W, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Moy C, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai E, Duda J, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Starr P, Simpson R, Baltuch G, De Salles A, Huang G, Reda D. Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med 2010;362(22):2077-91. [30] Volkmann J, Allert N, Voges J, Sturm V, Schnitzler A, Freund H. Long-term results of bilateral pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 2004;55(6):871-5. [31] Schupbach M, Gargiulo M, Welter ML, Mallet L, Behar C, Houeto JL, Maltete D, Mesnage V, Agid Y. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology 2006;66(12):1811-6. [32] Voon V, Fernagut P, Wickens J, Baunez C, Rodriguez M, Pavon N, Juncos J, Obeso J, Bezard E. Chronic dopaminergic stimulation in Parkinson's disease: from dyskinesias to impulse control disorders. Lancet Neurol 2009;8(12):1140-9. [33] Voon V, Krack P, Lang AE, Lozano AM, Dujardin K, Schüpbach M, D’Ambrosia J, Thobois S, Tamma F, Herzog J, Speelman JD, Samanta J, Kubu C, Rossignol H,

18


Poon Y-Y, Saint-Cyr JA, Ardouin C, Moro E. A multicentre study on suicide outcomes following subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Brain 2008;131(10):2720-8. [34] Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schafer H, Botzel K, Daniels C, Deutschlander A, Dillmann U, Eisner W, Gruber D, Hamel W, Herzog J, Hilker R, Klebe S, Kloss M, Koy J, Krause M, Kupsch A, Lorenz D, Lorenzl S, Mehdorn H, Moringlane J, Oertel W, Pinsker M, Reichmann H, Reuss A, Schneider G, Schnitzler A, Steude U, Sturm V, Timmermann L, Tronnier V, Trottenberg T, Wojtecki L, Wolf E, Poewe W, Voges J. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med 2006;355(9):896-908. [35] Bejjani B, Arnulf I, Demeret S, Damier P, Bonnet A, Houeto J, Agid Y. Levodopainduced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: is sensitization reversible? Ann Neurol 2000;47(5):655-8. [36] Nutt JG, Rufener SL, Carter JH, Anderson VC, Pahwa R, Hammerstad JP, Burchiel KJ. Interactions between deep brain stimulation and levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2001;57(10):1835-42. [37] Bejjani B, Damier P, Arnulf I, Bonnet AM, Vidailhet M, Dormont D, Pidoux B, Cornu P, Marsault C, Agid Y. Pallidal stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Two targets? Neurology 1997;49(6):1564-9. [38] Volkmann J, Allert N, Voges J, Weiss PH, Freund H-J, Sturm V. Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced PD. Neurology 2001;56(4):548-51. [39] Hamani C, Saint‐Cyr JA, Fraser J, Kaplitt M, Lozano AM. The subthalamic nucleus in the context of movement disorders. Brain 2004;127(1):4-20. [40] Breit S, LeBas J, Koudsie A, Schulz J, Benazzouz A, Pollak P, Benabid A. Pretargeting for the implantation of stimulation electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus: a comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and ventriculography. Neurosurgery 2006;58(1 Suppl):ONS83-95. [41] Cuny E, Guehl D, Burbaud P, Gross C, Dousset V, Rougier A. Lack of agreement between direct magnetic resonance imaging and statistical determination of a subthalamic target: the role of electrophysiological guidance. J Neurosurg 2002;97(3):591-7. [42] Chen S, Lee C, Lin S, Hsin Y, Lee T, Yen P, Chou Y, Lee C, Annie Hsieh W, Su C, Lin S. Microelectrode recording can be a good adjunct in magnetic resonance imagedirected subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for parkinsonism. Surg Neurol 2006;65(3):253-60; discussion 60-1. [43] Andrade-Souza Y, Schwalb J, Hamani C, Eltahawy H, Hoque T, Saint-Cyr J, Lozano A. Comparison of three methods of targeting the subthalamic nucleus for chronic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Neurosurgery 2005;56(2 Suppl):360-8; discussion -8. [44] Aziz TZ, Nandi D, Parkin S, Liu X, Giladi N, Bain P, Gregory RG, Joint C, Scott RB, Stein JF. Targeting the subthalamic nucleus. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2001;77(14):87-90. [45] Hariz M, Krack P, Melvill R, Jorgensen J, Hamel W, Hirabayashi H, Lenders M, Wesslen N, Tengvar M, Yousry T. A quick and universal method for stereotactic


19

visualization of the subthalamic nucleus before and after implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2003;80(1-4):96-101. [46] Vitek JL, Bakay RA, Hashimoto T, Kaneoke Y, Mewes K, Zhang JY, Rye D, Starr P, Baron M, Turner R, DeLong MR. Microelectrode-guided pallidotomy: technical approach and its application in medically intractable Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg 1998;88(6):1027-43. [47] Starr PA, Vitek JL, Bakay RA. Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1998;9(2):381-402. [48] Patel NK, Plaha P, Gill SS. Magnetic resonance imaging-directed method for functional neurosurgery using implantable guide tubes. Neurosurgery 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):35865; discussion 65-6. [49] Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, Martinez-Torres I, Tripoliti E, Petersen E, Holl E, Aviles-Olmos I, Jahanshahi M, Hariz M, Limousin P. MRI-guided STN DBS in Parkinson's disease without microelectrode recording: efficacy and safety. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010. [50] Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, Chabardes S, Fraix V, Ardouin C, Koudsie A, Limousin PD, Benazzouz A, LeBas JF, Benabid AL, Pollak P. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med 2003;349(20):1925-34. [51] Ben-Haim S, Asaad WF, Gale JT, Eskandar EN. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulation and the introduction of an improved microelectrode design. Neurosurgery 2009;64(4):754-62; discussion 62-3. [52] Binder DK, Rau GM, Starr PA. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrodeguided deep brain stimulator implantation for movement disorders. Neurosurgery 2005;56(4):722-32; discussion -32. [53] Kleiner-Fisman G, Herzog J, Fisman DN, Tamma F, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Lang AE, Deuschl G. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: summary and metaanalysis of outcomes. Mov Disord 2006;21 Suppl 14:S290-304. [54] Lin S, Chen T, Lin S, Shyr M, Chou Y, Hsieh W, Tsai S, Chen S. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation after anesthetic inhalation in Parkinson disease: a preliminary study. J Neurosurg 2008;109(2):238-44. [55] Hertel F, Zuchner M, Weimar I, Gemmar P, Noll B, Bettag M, Decker C. Implantation of electrodes for deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease with the aid of intraoperative microrecording under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 2006;59(5):E1138; discussion E. [56] Yamada K, Goto S, Kuratsu J, Matsuzaki K, Tamura T, Nagahiro S, Murase N, Shimazu H, Kaji R. Stereotactic surgery for subthalamic nucleus stimulation under general anesthesia: a retrospective evaluation of Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2007;13(2):101-7. [57] Maltete D, Navarro S, Welter M-L, Roche S, Bonnet A-M, Houeto J-L, Mesnage V, Pidoux B, Dormont D, Cornu P, Agid Y. Subthalamic Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: With or Without Anesthesia? Arch Neurol 2004;61(3):390-2. [58] Patel NK, Plaha P, O’Sullivan K, McCarter R, Heywood P, Gill SS. MRI directed bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2003;74(12):1631-7.

20


[59] Tabbal S, Revilla F, Mink J, Schneider-Gibson P, Wernle A, de Erausquin G, Perlmutter J, Rich K, Dowling J. Safety and efficacy of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation performed with limited intraoperative mapping for treatment of Parkinson's disease. Neurosurgery 2007;61(3 Suppl):119-27; discussion 27-9. [60] Amirnovin R, Williams Z, Cosgrove G, Eskandar E. Experience with microelectrode guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 2006;58(1 Suppl):ONS96-102; discussion ONS96-. [61] Hariz M, Blomstedt P, Limousin P. The myth of microelectrode recording in ensuring a precise location of the DBS electrode within the sensorimotor part of the subthalamic nucleus. Mov Disord 2004;19(7):863-4. [62] Duque P, Mateo O, Ruiz F, de Viloria J, Contreras A, Grandas F. Intraoperative microrecording under general anaesthesia with bispectral analysis monitoring in a case of deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurol 2008;15(8):e76-7. [63] Romanelli P, Heit G, Hill B, Kraus A, Hastie T, Bronte-Stewart H. Microelectrode recording revealing a somatotopic body map in the subthalamic nucleus in humans with Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg 2004;100(4):611-8. [64] Mandat T, Hurwitz T, Honey C. Hypomania as an adverse effect of subthalamic nucleus stimulation: report of two cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148(8):895-7; discussion 8. [65] Tsai S, Lin S, Lin S, Chen J, Lee C, Chen S. Neuropsychological effects after chronic subthalamic stimulation and the topography of the nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Neurosurgery 2007;61(5):E1024-9; discussion E9-30. [66] Kalenka A, Schwarz A. Anaesthesia and Parkinson's disease: how to manage with new therapies? Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2009;22(3):419-24. [67] Rozet I, Muangman S, Vavilala MS, Lee LA, Souter MJ, Domino KJ, Slimp JC, Goodkin R, Lam AM. Clinical Experience with Dexmedetomidine for Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulators in Parkinson's Disease. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2006;103(5):12248. [68] Deogaonkar A, Avitsian R, Henderson J, Schubert A. Venous air embolism during deep brain stimulation surgery in an awake supine patient. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2005;83(1):32-5. [69] Glossop A, Dobbs P. Coronary artery vasospasm during awake deep brain stimulation surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008;101(2):222-4. [70] Magni G, Rosa IL, Melillo G, Savio A, Rosa G. A Comparison Between Sevoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Intracranial Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009;109(2):567-71. [71] Bilotta F, Doronzio A, Cuzzone V, Caramia R, Rosa G. Early postoperative cognitive recovery and gas exchange patterns after balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane in overweight and obese patients undergoing craniotomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21(3):207-13. [72] Kumar R, Lozano AM, Montgomery E, Lang AE. Pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation of the pallidum and subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1998;13 Suppl 1:73-82.

2 Cost and Efficacy of Therapies for Advanced Parkinson's Disease Francesc Valldeoriola

Institut de Neurociències, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 1. Introduction The economic burden of Parkinson’s disease (PD) has become a very important health topic. From the perspective of a general neurologist, health economics can appear as not prioritary; however, it is a growing topic in most modern healthcare systems; consequently health professionals should have at least a minimal understanding of how health economic information is derived. It has become important that payers and providers consider the significant impact the disease has on quality of life and how resource utilisation is directed to improve PD related clinical problems. Such measures are determinant in assessing the value of drug therapy, particularly for chronic conditions such as PD, and in determining the appropriate placement of medications on plan formularies. In the past, a comprehensive examination of a clinical condition would focus almost exclusively on areas considered relevant to patient management, such as diagnosis, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. Now, however, additional demands are being made by health policy decision makers, who can influence medical decisions through coverage and reimbursement policies. Physicians and other professional caregivers increasingly must consider the economic implications of their decisions, which has led to increased demand for disease-specific cost information.

2. Economic burden of Parkinson disease PD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system with motor, cognitive, behavioural and autonomic symptoms. PD has a significant economic burden from all perspectives: society, health system, and individual patient and relatives. This is due to the high prevalence of the disease, 6.3 million people around the world (European Parkinson’s disease Association [EPDA], 2008), the nature of the symptoms and the fact that no cure exists and treatments are only aimed at relieving the effects of the disease and to improve patients’ quality of life. In Spain, taking into account a population of around 47 million people (Spanish National Institute of Statistics, 2010), and considering the different incidence and prevalence rates published (Abasolo-Osionaga et al., 2006; Benito-León et al., 2003; Bergareche et al., 2004; Claveria et al., 2002), the average incidence has been estimated at around 6,400 new cases per year, and the average prevalence at 150,000 people (European Parkinson’s Disease Association [EPDA], 2008) with PD. It is estimated that 30% of these patients are in an advanced stage of the disease (Kulisevsky, 2005). The economic impact of PD is mainly

22


driven by in-patient care and nursing home costs caused by motor and non-motor symptoms that lead patients of PD to progressive disability. In addition, the cost of illness increases dramatically with severity as patients at the advanced stages are bedridden, wheelchair bound or institutionalized. According to the most recent version of the World Health Organisation (WHO) report on Global Burden of Disease, published in 2008 (Mathers et al., 2008), neuropsychiatric conditions are responsible for 22% of global disability adjusted life years (DALYs) for women aged 15–59 years, the largest cause group in all regions outside Africa. The DALY is used as a measure to quantify the burden of the disease and consists on the years of life lived in less than full health or lost from premature death. It is also important to consider that these costs will increase along with the prevalence of these diseases due to the aging of the population in Europe. Several studies have been performed to date in different countries to analyze the economic and social burden of PD. According to this literature, the main drivers of the total direct cost of PD are hospitalization and drug costs (Keranen et al., 2003; O’Brien et al., 2009) and the main drivers of total indirect cost are nursing care and productivity loss (Dengler et al., 2006; Hagell et al., 2002; O’Brien et al., 2009). In the United States, the annual economic impact of PD was estimated in 2007 at $10.78 billion, being 58% of this amount related to direct medical costs ($6.22 billion) (O’Brien et al., 2009). Nursing home care ($2.6 billion) and PD-related medications ($1.47 billion) accounted for 63% of direct medical costs. Regarding indirect costs, annual lost productivity for persons with PD was estimated at $1 billion and caregivers cost at $2.36 billion. When considering the individual economic data, annual cost per patient was $21,626 (direct cost: $12,491). Another study published in the United States (Huse et al., 2005) in 2005 quantified direct medical care costs for individual patients with PD and compared them with the costs obtained in a control group of persons without PD. Total annual direct cots were $23,101 per patient with PD versus $11,247 for controls. According to the study and based on annual data, PD patients spent approximately 2 more days in the hospital, 43 more days in longterm care institutions, and required more than 20 additional prescriptions than controls. These differences led to an increment of total annual health care costs of approximately $12,000 in PD patients. Around 50% of this excess cost was for long-term care, 24% for outpatient services, 15% for hospitalization and 14% for pharmacological treatment. The study projected the total cost of PD for the United States to be around $23 billion annually. In an Australian study (Cordato et al., 2006) the total direct health-care cost of PD for patients with Hoehn and Yahr stage 3 was found to be four times higher than that of an ageand sex-matched control group of patients without PD. The estimated annual cost was Australian $7,020 per patient. Medication was the most costly component for both groups, being significantly higher for PD patients. Within the PD group, the health care costs attributable to PD were significantly higher than health care costs not related to PD (for a 3 month period, A$1,202 versus A$553). As concerns European data, no Pan-European survey of the economic cost of PD has been performed to date. However, several studies from different countries are available in the literature. Some of the most representative ones have been considered for this chapter. A review of the literature on the economic impact of PD in UK (Findley, 2007) reported an estimated total cost of PD in the UK between £449 million and £3.3 billion annually, depending on the methodology and prevalence rate considered in each individual analysis.

Cost and Efficacy of Therapies for Advanced Parkinson's Disease

23

In another study in 2003, service use and costs for PD patients in the UK (McCrone et al., 2007) were measured. The annual costs were £13,804 per patient. Formal care costs accounted for 20% of this amount, while informal care was related to the 80% of the burden. Predictors of higher costs were identified, being male gender, level of disability and depression the more significant ones. A study published in 2003 (Zecchinelli et al., 2003) assessed health care costs associated with PD in Italy. Patients and results were classified using the Hoehn and Yahr scale. Annual direct health costs were €4,320 for mild stage (1-2), €4,748 for moderate stage (2.5-3) and €6,175 for severe stage (4-5). The average was estimated at €4,808. These results were identified as lower than the real cost, as they didn’t consider the societal perspective and neither informal care nor health care costs incurred in the private sector were included. In Germany a 3-year prospective study of the economic cost of PD (Dengler et al., 2006) was performed in 2006. The average annual cost per patient was estimated at €12,091, of which 55,9% accounted for direct costs. Drugs took up the major share of direct costs, €5,763 per year. Indirect costs accounted for €4,851 per patient per year. Within this, 76% of the costs were related to nursing care and the loss of productivity. In Sweden resource use and costs in patients with PD were collected from medical records of a cohort of 127 patients (Hagell et al., 2002) in 1996 (year 2000 costs). Direct health care costs averaged approximately €3,200 per patient per year, of which drugs were the most costly component. Non-medical direct costs were higher, €4,800 per patient per year, and costs due to lost productivity were around €5,800 per patient per year. The average total annual cost for PD was therefore estimated at €13,800 per patient. Costs of PD illness were studied in a Russian Cohort of 100 patients (year 2008 costs) (Winter et al., 2009). From the societal perspective, total annual costs per patient amounted to €5,240 per patient, with direct costs accounting for 67% and indirect costs for 33% of the total. The main drivers of the burden were informal care and drugs. Global costs for the nation were estimated at €1.1 billion per year. One of the most recent European studies, published in 2010, was performed in a cohort of 100 Czech patients with idiopathic PD to evaluate direct and indirect costs and to identify cost-driving factors (Winter et al., 2010b). Results were assessed for a 6-month period and have been projected to annual costs. Total annual costs for PD were €11,020 per patient. Direct costs accounted for 60% of the total costs and indirect for 40%. Independent costdriving factors included disease severity, motor complications, psychosis and age. The degenerative nature of PD leads to an increase of resource consumption in its advance stages. In fact, disease severity has been identified as a strong cost-predictor in several of the studies already mentioned. Motor complications (fluctuations, dyskinesias, dystonia) have been identified as factors increasing PD-related costs (Dowding et al., 2006; McCrone et al., 2007; Winter et al., 2010a; Winter et al., 2010b; Zecchinelli et al., 2003). In a 6-month observational study of PD in France, Germany and the UK, patients with different degrees of motor complications, measured using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and its effects on health care costs were examined (Péchevis et al., 2005). Dyskinesia (UPDRS part IVa) was associated with significant increases in total health care costs. Each unit increase in dyskinesia score lead to €562 additional costs per patient over a 6-month period. A 2007 published study developed in the UK (Thanvi et al., 2007) showed that Levodopa induced dyskinesia increased health care costs. Relationship between increasing cost of care and severity of the disease as measured by Hoehn and Yahr stage was proven to be

24


statistically significant. A correlation was also found between the severity of the disease, patient’s age and the use of Social Services. If we focus on advanced PD (APD) treatment costs, a systematic review of the available economic evidence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for APD was performed in 2009 (PuigJunoy & Puig, 2009). Ten studies were identified, five of them being simple cost analyses and the other five, full economic evaluations. The cost studies included were: one description of costs of the treatment with DBS (McIntosh et al., 2003) and four comparative analyses (Charles et al., 2004; D’Ausilio et al., 2003; Fraix et al., 2006; Gerzeli et al., 2002) of DBS versus conservative pharmacological treatment. In the comparative analyses, a significant difference was observed when annual average pharmacological cost was compared between conservative treatment and DBS. The independent average cost of the DBS intervention was specified in four of the five cost studies. These results showed some variability from €20.033 (Gerzeli et al., 2002) to -€33.220 (McIntosh et al., 2003), explained mainly by differences in resources utilization, which was highly driven by surgeons’ level of experience. The intervention duration and costs decreased along with the increase of professional experience on DBS. It was also observed that pharmacological treatment costs were lower in patients after DBS intervention than in patients that remained in conservative pharmacological treatment. Regarding costs distribution, the higher resource consumption for DBS was experienced during the first year of the therapy. The comparison of DBS costs to conventional pharmacological alternative is sensitive to the inclusion of non-health related costs. When productivity loss and informal care costs were considered (Gerzeli et al., 2002), the cost of the DBS alternative was lower to the cost of the conventional pharmacological treatment.

3. Cost-effectiveness of bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson’s disease Levodopa combined with adjunct medical therapy is the standard medical treatment for individuals with PD. However, prolonged use of levodopa can cause disabling motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. When medication is no longer effective or produces unacceptable side effects, surgical treatments may be a possible alternative. Ablative surgery and DBS are the main surgical treatments for advanced refractory PD. Ablative surgery includes pallidotomy, thalamotomy and subthalamotomy, which destroy the globus pallidus (GPi), thalamic nucleus and subthalamic nucleus (STN), respectively. Once the suitable target tissue has been located, it is destroyed by a radio frequency or thermocoagulation method. Expert opinion suggests nowadays that ablative procedures are rarely performed in Western countries although such procedures are still available as a treatment option for individuals in developing countries. Ablative surgery has largely been replaced by DBS, in part because DBS is potentially reversible and is perceived to be associated with improved safety and effectiveness and, in part, because ablative surgery is irreversible and regarded as having limited effectiveness and significant safety concerns. In patients with inadequate control of parkinsonian symptoms by medical treatments, bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has emerged as a surgical choice for APD and has been shown to improve motor function, motor fluctuations, and health related quality of life (HRQoL) and to reduce medication usage and drug induced dyskinesia (Deuschl et al., 2006; Krack et al., 2003; Martínez-Martín et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Oroz et al., 2005; Siderowf et al., 2006; Schupbach et al., 2005; Valldeoriola et al., 2002). DBS was


25

approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products (EMEA) for the treatment of APD, but it is still considered a relatively expensive therapy. Authorities are concerned because of the increased health expenses and are taking containment measures based on the principle that the distribution of resources must be supported by the efficiency and not exclusively by the direct clinical benefit (Greenberg et al., 1999; Weinstein et al., 2001). The DBS procedure is generally performed in two separate steps, implantation of leads followed by implantation of the neurostimulator to which the leads are connected. Patients need to be tested initially for their responsiveness to therapy. This is accomplished by implanting a lead at the relevant site using a combination of stereotactic techniques such as image-guided stereotactic localisation and physiological techniques such as microelectrode mapping or macrostimulation. The implantation procedure is generally performed under local anaesthetic. The placement of the electrode at a particular site is determined by the patient’s response to stimulation, involving physical evaluation of the lower limbs and face muscles, and interpretation of the microelectrode recording data. Once the target that elicits the best response has been localised, the testing electrodes are removed and replaced with permanent leads. Although DBS is non-ablative, the procedure may give rise to complications and side effects, some of which are neither reversible nor adaptable. The complications from DBS can arise before surgery, during surgery, in the immediate post-operative period, and after surgery. Data available on adverse events are derived from case series. Findings from these studies indicated the risk associated with DBS but did not allow quantisation of those risks compared with the Best Medical Treatment (BMT). A systematic review of case series to assess the safety and effectiveness of bilateral STN-DBS for the symptoms of PD in a total of 537 individuals has been performed (Amani et al., 2005). The authors reported the mortality rate, adverse events related to stimulation, general neurological and surgical complications and hardware-related complications. Mortality occurred at a rate of 0.4 per cent. The adverse events related to stimulation (and rates of occurrence) were: hypophonia (5.8%), eyelid apraxia (4.6%), increased libido (0.8%), sialorrhea (0.9%) and decreased memory (1.1%). Other stimulation-related adverse events included dystonia, paraesthesias, diplopia, dyskinesias and dysarthria; however these events were not reported in the studies or were underestimated. The adverse events related to general neurological and surgical complications (and rates of occurrence) were: depression (4.7%), mania/hypomania (2.0%), peri-operative confusion (13.7%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (0.1%), meningitis (0.1%), venous phlebitis (0.7%), pneumonia (0.4%), urinary tract infections (0.3%), pulmonary embolism (0.5%), seizures (0.9%), haemorrhage (2.8%). Weight gain was also considered to fall into this category, but was reported to be under-quantified in the studies. The adverse events from hardware-related complications (and rates of occurrence) were: lead problems including lead migration, breakage and repositioning (4.5%), and infections of the hardware (3.4%). The results shown n the literature review indicated that DBS allowed the maintenance of abilities to perform activities and increased motor function in the absence of effective medical treatment. In the absence of a comparator group, it is not possible to quantify the effect attributable to DBS; however, the worsening of akinesia, speech, postural stability, freezing of gait and cognitive function is consistent with the natural history of PD over time (Krack et al., 2003).

26


The effectiveness of DBS for the treatment of symptoms of PD has been assessed from one double-blind crossover and three case-control studies. DBS appears to be effective for the treatment of PD symptoms, with statistically significant changes observed between case and control participants in UPDRS and PDQ-39SI scores. These results therefore show that DBS can ameliorate the symptoms of PD (as measured by the UPDRS ADL and Motor sections) and reduce the antiparkinsonian medication required to maintain control of the symptoms of PD. Patients experienced up to a 90 per cent reduction at 24 months following surgery in the daily OFF rate. However, the assessment of the effectiveness of DBS for the treatment of symptoms is generally limited by the number of individuals analysed; significant losses to follow-up in some studies; and follow-up of the participants to a maximum of only 48 months. The reduction in antiparkinsonian medication after DBS may also significantly reduce some of the side effects of high-dose levodopa treatment over a long time (Charles et al., 2004; Mínguez-Castellanos et al., 2005; Molinuevo et al., 2000). Most of the studies on cost-effectiveness in STN-DBS have been designed in the absence of a control group of similar characteristics receiving conventional oral medication supposed to be the BMT possible. In some of the studies, the costs of expensive therapies such as apomorphine pump infusions were also considered within the concept of BMT. A cost-effectiveness study has been published with the aim of assessing the long term costeffectiveness of DBS versus BMT (Tomaszewski & Holloway, 2001) using modelling techniques to predict long term clinical and economical consequences of using DBS and BMT in advanced PD patients, showing that DBS may be an efficient therapy to treat PD patients. Such mathematical models can be useful to predict long-term cost-effectiveness, considering that long-term studies are difficult to perform in clinical practice. It is likely that such positive cost-effectiveness results would extend at least to the next two or three years after the intervention. This possibility was suggested in a survey which showed a 32% increase in total costs during the first year after surgery but a reduction of 54% for the second year, when compared to preoperative values (Charles et al., 2004). Other studies have shown similar results: a retrospective cost-effectiveness study of DBS in Germany in 46 parkinsonian patients (Meissner et al., 2005) showed an estimated Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of €979 for one point improvement of the UPDRS-III in one year; in this survey the annual pharmacological expenses were of €11,230 one year before the implantation while of only €4,449 two years after surgery. A multicentric French survey (Fraix et al., 2006) observed similar improvement of UPDRS scores and decrement of PD costs. In another survey, a prospective analysis, the incremental cost per total UPDRS unit improvement turned out to be €920 (Spottke et al., 2002). Some studies have included the cost of the battery replacement after five years of use (D’Ausilio et al., 2003; McIntosh et al., 2003; Tomaszewski & Holloway, 2001). Only a few studies considered a social perspective by showing costs derived from the losses and gains of productivity of both the patient and the caregiver before and after the intervention. Most of studies, however, are based in a retrospective design, with a short number of patients and follow-up and the absence of a control group of patients of similar clinical characteristics. Due to the absence of prospective studies comparing cost-efficacy of STN-DBS with control patients, we designed an open, prospective longitudinal study comparative of the cost, effectiveness and HRQoL between the treatment with STN-DBS and BMT in patients with


27

APD (Valldeoriola et al., 2007). Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. All were included in a waiting list for STN-DBS at our centre. All participating patients signed an informed consent form. Among the patients in the waiting list for STN-DBS, the first consecutive fourteen patients were enrolled in the treatment group and the last consecutive fifteen patients were enrolled in the control group. The treatment group was assigned to STN-DBS; the control group was assigned to BMT. Both groups (STN-DBS and BMT) were largely comparable in their clinical and demographic variables including mean levodopa equivalent doses. The study estimated only direct costs. We divided them into two categories: direct medical costs, related to costs for goods and services used in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of the illness (for example costs for medical visits, hospitalization and pharmaceuticals); and direct non-medical costs, generally assumed by the patient, including expenses related to the disease (for example transportation, social services, adaptation of accommodation and any kind of special equipment, facilities or orthopaedic material). Our results showed that the ICER needed to obtain an additional improvement of one unit in the total UPDRS score was €239.8. Current management of APD includes combinations of expensive drugs and therefore savings after STN-DBS were mainly attributable to the reduction of pharmacological expenses. The incremental cost-effectiveness was of €34,389 per QALY. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is a measure of disease burden, including both the quality and the quantity of life lived. It is used in assessing the value for money of a medical intervention. The QALY model requires utility independent, risk neutral, and constant proportional trade-off behaviour. The QALY is based on the number of years of life that would be added by the intervention. Each year in perfect health is assigned the value of 1.0 down to a value of 0.0 for death. We also performed sensitivity analyses under different situations. When we excluded the BMT patient group patient who had a prolonged hospitalisation from the analysis, the incremental cost per QALY was of €44,078 (X1.3). In this study, two patients in the BMT group were treated with Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of Apomorphine (CSIA), a therapy that is also considered to be expensive. Consequently we also calculated the costeffectiveness of STN-DBS when excluding these patients, obtaining a result of €62,148 per QALY (X1.8). This study showed STN-DBS anti-parkinsonian clinical efficacy and that costeffectiveness is directly related to clinical improvement in parkinsonism and to the reduction of pharmacological expenses after the intervention. As shown by others (Charles et al., 2004; Fraix et al., 2006; Meissner et al., 2005; Spottke et al., 2002), this survey in the Spanish setting showed that STN-DBS is within the adequate limits to be considered as an efficient therapy. Considering the published data available in the literature assessing DBS for APD, it can be considered safe, effective and cost-effective compared with BMT. There is sufficient evidence of safety and effectiveness, and robust information on cost-effectiveness is unlikely to emerge but the total cost is acceptable for patients in whom other therapies are insufficient. The insertion of a DBS system incurs upfront costs but may result in cost savings from its effect of controlling the motor symptoms of PD as disease progresses, allowing patients to live in more functional health states for longer periods of time with improved QoL. To date, there appears to be no evidence that DBS delays the progression of PD or affects the mortality rate, although it may be argued that mortality due to falling, for example, may

28


decrease with improvements in motor skills. These savings could be realised through a reduced demand for services or a lower expenditure on certain examinations.

4. Cost analysis of DBS, CSIA and CDLCI in advanced Parkinson’s disease: The SCOPE Study For physicians in general and for neurologists in special, it becomes quite challenging to achieve an antiparkinsonian medication regimen that keeps the patient mobile while at the same time does not create side effects that outweigh the benefits of treatment, impacting patient’s quality of life (Adler, 2002). In these APD patients, refractory to pharmacological treatment, three treatments may be recommended such as DBS, Continuous Duodenal Levodopa–Carbidopa Infusion (CDLCI), and CSIA. These therapies are not recommended for all patients with APD and an adequate patient selection allows the optimization of results obtained with the three therapeutic options. Additionally, the three treatments have no clear positioning in the treatment pathway of APD patients, which leaves the decision about the eligibility of APD patients for one therapy or another to neurologists. Such decision can therefore be subjective and largely depends on the patient’s clinical status, patients’ and physicians’ preferences, as well as previous hospital experience, availability of these treatments or economic constraints. To date, as it has been described, no economic evaluation has been published comparing the costs-effectiveness profile of these three therapeutic options that exist for APD. The main reason could be the lack of published direct clinical evidence comparing at least two of the three therapies. In these cases, a modelling method can be done as a simulation of the costeffectiveness results (Stahl , 2008). A healthcare costs compqarison considering all the costs in the medium and long term (not only the acquisition costs) associated with the treatments and their consequences of chronic diseases management like PD is a valuable tool both for payers and physicians, offering useful information to support their decision making in the treatment of this patient population (Mycka et al., 2010). In order to address this evidence gap, the first cost study worldwide has already been submitted (Valldeoriola et al., 2011). The SCOPE study1 is a descriptive, quantitative and economic analysis that tried to compare the healthcare costs associated with these three alternative treatments for a 5-years, period in patients with APD in the perspective of the Spanish Healthcare System. One DBS battery replacement was included in the analysis, as the average battery life of a non-rechargeable neurostimulator has seem to oscillate between four to five years (BinMahfoodh et al., 2003; Krack et al., 2003). The costs of the devices and components of CDLCI and CSIA (infusion pump, catheters, etc.) were not included; thus it was assumed that they were provided free of charge by the supplier, and therefore their cost to the healthcare system was zero. Once all the health resources associated with the therapies were identified and quantified, its cost per unit or ‘price` was obtained from the Spanish health resources database (Spanish Cost Database, e-salud (Spanish Cost Database, e-salud, 2010). Finally, 1 SCOPE: eStudio COstes Parkinson Enfermedad. The SCOPE Study was evaluated and approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Research of the Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona.

29


the average total cost for each of the three therapies per patient was then obtained for the 5years, period. In order to test the statistical differences of mean costs, the data analysis was carried out with the SPSS 15.0 software package for Windows and comparisons among the three therapies (non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks multiple comparisons) and between the two therapies with the lower average total costs, DBS vs CSIA (Hollander & Wolf, 1999). Due to the higher APD costs in the first six months, when patients consume more health resources (extra visits, hospitalization, dose adjustments, etc.) (D’Ausilio at al., 2003; McIntosh et al., 2003; Tomaszewski & Holloway, 2001), it was decided to divide the HQR in four sections, or phases. In Table 1, the average cost per patient associated with the three alternative therapies in the baseline scenario for different phases are shown. Phases DBS 1. Pre-treatment period to hospitalization

1,141 ± 411

Average Costs CDLCI

CSIA

1,705 ± 357

1,231 ± 267

2. Hospitalization period to discharge (includes Procedure 27,236 ± 3,105 * or Treatment Administration)

3,165 ± 501 *

785 ± 197 *

3. Discharge from hospital to 6 4,768 ± 918 * # months post-op

25,521 ± 2,381 *

12,094 ± 2,158 * #

4. From month 6 to year 5

54,869 ± 4,190 * #

203,596 ± 8,737 *

127,284 ± 9,184 * #

Total cost per 5 years

88,014 ± 2,580 * #

233,986 ± 10,552 * 141,393 ± 9,945 * #

Average Cost per year

17,603±516 * #

46,797 ±2,110 *

28,279 ±1,989 * #

(*) Comparison of the three therapies (p EGCG > EC > (+)-C > EGC and the antiapoptotic activities appear to be structurally related to the 3gallate group (Jin, C. F. et al., 2001, Nie et al., 2002). In a related study, it was showed that EGCG protected against 6-OHDA via stimulation of PKC and modulation of cell survival/cell cycle genes such as Bax, Bad, Mdm2, Bcl-2, Bcl-w, and Bcl-x(L) and also by potent antioxidant and iron chelating actions thereby preventing nuclear translocation and activation of cell death promoting NFB (Levites et al., 2002a). Since the stability and bioavailability of EGCG are restricted, Chao et al. generated and tested a pro-drug representing a fully acetylated EGCG (pEGCG) in a PD cell model (Chao et al., 2010a). They found that pEGCG displayed improved protection compared to EGCG against 6-OHDA toxicity in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells probably via activation of Akt pathway and reduced caspase-3 activity. In contrast, when Leaver et al. administered rats with EGCG for 14 days followed by exposure to 6-OHDA, they observed that EGCG produced subtle symptomatic relief in lesioned animals and could not prevent neuronal damage to a significant extent (Leaver et al., 2009). Tea extracts and EGCG have displayed therapeutic effect in other toxic models of PD. Tea extract and EGCG protected against MPTP mediated dopamine loss and neurotoxicity in vivo and this effect could be mediated by inhibition of NOS (Choi et al., 2002, Kim, J. S. et al., 2010, Li, R. et al., 2006). In a related study, it was demonstrated that green tea extract and EGCG protected against MPTP neurotoxicity via antioxidant effects and inhibition of monoamine oxidase-B (MOAB) (Levites et al. 2001). Mechanistically, green tea polyphenols can ameliorate neuronal damage via inhibitory effects on dopamine transporters (DAT), through which they block MPP+ uptake and protect dopaminergic neurons against MPP+induced injury (Pan, T. et al., 2003). Similarly, Hou et al. (2008) demonstrated that EGCG attenuated cell death in PC12 cells induced by the herbicide and PD toxin paraquat (PQ) by maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential, inhibiting caspase-3 activity and down regulating the expression of pro-apoptotic protein second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspase (SMAC) in cytosol. However, in rotenone-treated mesencephalic cultures and organotypic striatal cultures, EGCG protected striatal slices to a limited extent by counteracting NO production by rotenone but was not significantly effective against rotenone toxicity in mesencephalic cultures (Moldzio et al., 2010). Green tea could also protect against environmental toxin-induced cell injury and neuroinflammation with implications for PD. Tai and Truong (2010) reported that EGCG reduced dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT)-induced cell death in dopaminergic SH-

132


SY5Y cells suggesting that EGCG might activate a protective mechanism that might alleviate organochlorine pesticide-induced cell injury. Likewise, EGCG also inhibited LPS-activated microglial secretion of NO and TNF-α through the down-regulation of iNOS and TNF-α expression thereby protecting against neuroinflammation and injury in dopaminergic neurons (Li, R. et al. 2004). The antioxidant property of EGCG is also beneficial against protein aggregation in PD. Iron induces toxic aggregation of monomeric alpha synuclein leading to neurodegeneration in dopaminergic neurons. In the MPTP model, iron accumulation is also linked to NO-dependent mechanism. Mandel et al. showed that EGCG prevented the accumulation of iron and alpha-synuclein in SN thereby preventing neuronal damage (Mandel, S. et al., 2004). However, green tea and its constituent polyphenols could not protect PC12 cells against L-glutamate and MPP+ (Mazzio et al., 2001).

6. Conclusions Most of the drugs currently used in PD therapy replenish the brain dopamine and provide symptomatic relief during early PD. However, many patients develop motor complications with chronic treatment. Further, these drugs do not slowdown or prevent the progression of the disease since their ability to prevent neuronal damage has not been comprehensively validated in humans. Therefore, novel therapies with possible curative properties are being exploited for adjunctive therapy. It is well documented that neurodegeneration in PD is contributed by several interrelated disease pathways but the molecular mechanisms of their relationships and their chronology have not been completely understood. Therefore, any molecule(s) with therapeutic potential in PD should be simultaneously effective against multiple pathways. In this regard, several in vitro and in vivo studies using PD models have tested natural antioxidants and molecules for their ability to protect against neurodegeneration with implications for therapy. The most prominent are the polyphenolic antioxidants obtained from plant sources. Most of these compounds display antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties, cross the blood-brain barrier and prevent neuronal damage in neurological disorders. Recent studies strongly support the clinical application of these compounds in PD. The current chapter explores the therapeutic potential of polyphenols such as curcumin, resveratrol and tea polyphenols in PD. These three polyphenols share common biological properties including antioxidant function, low toxicity and therapeutic benefits in the brain of different PD models. The available data indeed indicate that these polyphenols could have therapeutic potential in PD. Although several studies have been carried out in the recent years, the biological properties and health benefits of these polyphenols have not been completely understood. However, the most important limiting factor for the therapeutic application of these compounds in PD is their limited bioavailability in vivo. Further, the delivery of compounds specifically to mid-brain dopaminergic neurons for maximum therapeutic effect has not been completely standardized. Apart from this, studies are also needed to test the safety and efficacy in humans to translate the experimental results for therapeutic application in PD patients.

7. Acknowledgements This study was financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology (No. SR/FT/L-152/2005 to MMSB). RBM is supported by an extended senior research fellowship from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India. GH is supported by a

Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Parkinson’s Disease

133

senior research fellowship from Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), India. NR is supported by a junior research fellowship from CSIR, India.

8. References Abd El Mohsen MM, Kuhnle G, Rechner AR, Schroeter H, Rose S, Jenner P & Rice-Evans CA (2002) Uptake and metabolism of epicatechin and its access to the brain after oral ingestion. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 33, No. 12, (Dec 15 2002):pp. (1693-1702), 08915849 (Print) Adams BK, Cai J, Armstrong J, Herold M, Lu YJ, Sun A, Snyder JP, Liotta DC, Jones DP & Shoji M (2005) EF24, a novel synthetic curcumin analog, induces apoptosis in cancer cells via a redox-dependent mechanism. Anticancer Drugs. Vol. 16, No. 3, (Mar 2005):pp. (263-275), 0959-4973 (Print) Aggarwal BB, Bhatt, I.D., Ichikawa, H., Ahn, K.S., Sethi, G., Sandur, S.K., Natarajan, C., Seeram, N., Shishodia, S. (2006) Curcumin–biological and medicinal properties. in: Turmeric: the genus Curcuma, (ed.), pp (297-368), Taylor and Francis GroupLondon Agullo G, Gamet-Payrastre L, Manenti S, Viala C, Remesy C, Chap H & Payrastre B (1997) Relationship between flavonoid structure and inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3kinase: a comparison with tyrosine kinase and protein kinase C inhibition. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 53, No. 11, (Jun 1 1997):pp. (1649-1657), 0006-2952 (Print) Albani D, Polito L, Batelli S, De Mauro S, Fracasso C, Martelli G, Colombo L, Manzoni C, Salmona M, Caccia S, Negro A & Forloni G (2009) The SIRT1 activator resveratrol protects SK-N-BE cells from oxidative stress and against toxicity caused by alphasynuclein or amyloid-beta (1-42) peptide. J Neurochem. Vol. 110, No. 5, (Sep 2009):pp. (1445-1456), 1471-4159 (Electronic) Albani D, Polito L, Signorini A & Forloni G (2010) Neuroprotective properties of resveratrol in different neurodegenerative disorders. Biofactors. Vol. 36, No. 5, (Sep 2010):pp. (370-376), 1872-8081 (Electronic) Alessi DR, Cuenda A, Cohen P, Dudley DT & Saltiel AR (1995) PD 098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. Vol. 270, No. 46, (Nov 17 1995):pp. (27489-27494), 0021-9258 (Print) Alladi PA, Mahadevan A, Yasha TC, Raju TR, Shankar SK & Muthane U (2009) Absence of age-related changes in nigral dopaminergic neurons of Asian Indians: relevance to lower incidence of Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience. Vol. 159, No. 1, (Mar 3 2009):pp. (236-245), 0306-4522 (Print) Almeida QJ, Hyson HC (2008) The evolution of pharmacological treatment for Parkinson's disease. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. 2008 Jan;Vol 3, No. 1, (Jan 2008): pp. (50-54). Alvira D, Yeste-Velasco M, Folch J, Verdaguer E, Canudas AM, Pallas M & Camins A (2007) Comparative analysis of the effects of resveratrol in two apoptotic models: inhibition of complex I and potassium deprivation in cerebellar neurons. Neuroscience. Vol. 147, No. 3, (Jul 13 2007):pp. (746-756), 0306-4522 (Print) Alwi I, Santoso T, Suyono S, Sutrisna B, Suyatna FD, Kresno SB & Ernie S (2008) The effect of curcumin on lipid level in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Acta Med Indones. Vol. 40, No. 4, (Oct 2008):pp. (201-210), 0125-9326 (Print)

134


Anandhan A, Tamilselvam K, Vijayraja D, Kumar NA, Rajasankar S & Manivasagam T (2010) Resveratrol attenuates oxidative stress and improves behaviour in 1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) challenged mice, Anderson DW, Bradbury KA & Schneider JS (2006) Neuroprotection in Parkinson models varies with toxin administration protocol. Eur J Neurosci. Vol. 24, No. 11, (Dec 2006):pp. (3174-3182), 0953-816X (Print) Barclay LR, Vinqvist MR, Mukai K, Goto H, Hashimoto Y, Tokunaga A & Uno H (2000) On the antioxidant mechanism of curcumin: classical methods are needed to determine antioxidant mechanism and activity. Org Lett. Vol. 2, No. 18, (Sep 7 2000):pp. (28412843), 1523-7060 (Print) Barranco Quintana JL, Allam MF, Del Castillo AS & Navajas RF (2009) Parkinson's disease and tea: a quantitative review. J Am Coll Nutr. Vol. 28, No. 1, (Feb 2009):pp. (1-6), 1541-1087 (Electronic) Baur JA & Sinclair DA (2006) Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Vol. 5, No. 6, (Jun 2006):pp. (493-506), 1474-1776 (Print) Ben-Shachar D, Zuk R & Glinka Y (1995) Dopamine neurotoxicity: inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. J Neurochem. Vol. 64, No. 2, (Feb 1995):pp. (718-723), 0022-3042 (Print) Bharath S, Hsu M, Kaur D, Rajagopalan S & Andersen JK (2002) Glutathione, iron and Parkinson's disease. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 64, No. 5-6, (Sep 2002):pp. (1037-1048), 0006-2952 (Print) Bharti AC, Donato N & Aggarwal BB (2003) Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) inhibits constitutive and IL-6-inducible STAT3 phosphorylation in human multiple myeloma cells. J Immunol. Vol. 171, No. 7, (Oct 1 2003):pp. (3863-3871), 0022-1767 (Print) Bhat NR, Zhang P, Lee JC & Hogan EL (1998) Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 subgroups of mitogen-activated protein kinases regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase and tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression in endotoxin-stimulated primary glial cultures. J Neurosci. Vol. 18, No. 5, (Mar 1 1998):pp. (1633-1641), 02706474 (Print) Biasutto L, Marotta E, Garbisa S, Zoratti M & Paradisi C (2010) Determination of Quercetin and Resveratrol in Whole Blood—Implications for Bioavailability Studies. Molecules. Vol. 15, No. 9, 2010):pp. (6570-6579), 1420-3049 Bierhaus A, Zhang Y, Quehenberger P, Luther T, Haase M, Muller M, Mackman N, Ziegler R & Nawroth PP (1997) The dietary pigment curcumin reduces endothelial tissue factor gene expression by inhibiting binding of AP-1 to the DNA and activation of NF-kappa B. Thromb Haemost. Vol. 77, No. 4, (Apr 1997):pp. (772-782), 0340-6245 (Print) Bishnoi M, Chopra K, Rongzhu L & Kulkarni SK (2010) Protective Effect of Curcumin and its Combination with Piperine (Bioavailability Enhancer) Against HaloperidolAssociated Neurotoxicity: Cellular and Neurochemical Evidence. Neurotox Res. Vol., No. (Nov 13 2010):pp. 1476-3524 (Electronic) Blanchet J, Longpre F, Bureau G, Morissette M, DiPaolo T, Bronchti G & Martinoli MG (2008) Resveratrol, a red wine polyphenol, protects dopaminergic neurons in MPTP-treated mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. Vol. 32, No. 5, (Jul 1 2008):pp. (1243-1250), 0278-5846 (Print)


135

Boege F, Straub T, Kehr A, Boesenberg C, Christiansen K, Andersen A, Jakob F & Kohrle J (1996) Selected novel flavones inhibit the DNA binding or the DNA religation step of eukaryotic topoisomerase I. J Biol Chem. Vol. 271, No. 4, (Jan 26 1996):pp. (22622270), 0021-9258 (Print) Bors W, Heller W, Michel C & Saran M (1990) Flavonoids as antioxidants: determination of radical-scavenging efficiencies. Methods Enzymol. Vol. 186, No. 1990):pp. (343-355), 0076-6879 (Print) Bournival J, Quessy P & Martinoli MG (2009) Protective effects of resveratrol and quercetin against MPP+ -induced oxidative stress act by modulating markers of apoptotic death in dopaminergic neurons. Cell Mol Neurobiol. Vol. 29, No. 8, (Dec 2009):pp. (1169-1180), 1573-6830 (Electronic) Bravo L (1998) Polyphenols: chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutr Rev. Vol. 56, No. 11, (Nov 1998):pp. (317-333), 0029-6643 (Print) Brouet I & Ohshima H (1995) Curcumin, an anti-tumour promoter and anti-inflammatory agent, inhibits induction of nitric oxide synthase in activated macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Vol. 206, No. 2, (Jan 17 1995):pp. (533-540), 0006-291X (Print) Bureau G, Longpre F & Martinoli MG (2008) Resveratrol and quercetin, two natural polyphenols, reduce apoptotic neuronal cell death induced by neuroinflammation. J Neurosci Res. Vol. 86, No. 2, (Feb 1 2008):pp. (403-410), 1097-4547 (Electronic) Butterfield D, Castegna A, Pocernich C, Drake J, Scapagnini G & Calabrese V (2002) Nutritional approaches to combat oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease. J Nutr Biochem. Vol. 13, No. 8, (Aug 2002):pp. (444), 1873-4847 (Electronic) Chan MM, Huang HI, Fenton MR & Fong D (1998) In vivo inhibition of nitric oxide synthase gene expression by curcumin, a cancer preventive natural product with antiinflammatory properties. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 55, No. 12, (Jun 15 1998):pp. (1955-1962), 0006-2952 (Print) Chanas SA, Jiang Q, McMahon M, McWalter GK, McLellan LI, Elcombe CR, Henderson CJ, Wolf CR, Moffat GJ, Itoh K, Yamamoto M & Hayes JD (2002) Loss of the Nrf2 transcription factor causes a marked reduction in constitutive and inducible expression of the glutathione S-transferase Gsta1, Gsta2, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3 and Gstm4 genes in the livers of male and female mice. Biochem J. Vol. 365, No. Pt 2, (Jul 15 2002):pp. (405-416), 0264-6021 (Print) Chao J, Lau WK, Huie MJ, Ho YS, Yu MS, Lai CS, Wang M, Yuen WH, Lam WH, Chan TH & Chang RC (2010a) A pro-drug of the green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3gallate (EGCG) prevents differentiated SH-SY5Y cells from toxicity induced by 6hydroxydopamine. Neurosci Lett. Vol. 469, No. 3, (Jan 29 2010a):pp. (360-364), 18727972 (Electronic) Chao J, Li H, Cheng KW, Yu MS, Chang RC & Wang M (2010b) Protective effects of pinostilbene, a resveratrol methylated derivative, against 6-hydroxydopamineinduced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. J Nutr Biochem. Vol. 21, No. 6, (Jun 2010b):pp. (482-489), 1873-4847 (Electronic) Chao J, Yu MS, Ho YS, Wang M & Chang RC (2008) Dietary oxyresveratrol prevents parkinsonian mimetic 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxicity. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 45, No. 7, (Oct 1 2008):pp. (1019-1026), 0891-5849 (Print) Chaturvedi RK, Shukla S, Seth K, Chauhan S, Sinha C, Shukla Y & Agrawal AK (2006) Neuroprotective and neurorescue effect of black tea extract in 6-hydroxydopamine-

136


lesioned rat model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis. Vol. 22, No. 2, (May 2006):pp. (421-434), 0969-9961 (Print) Chen A & Xu J (2005) Activation of PPAR{gamma} by curcumin inhibits Moser cell growth and mediates suppression of gene expression of cyclin D1 and EGFR. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. Vol. 288, No. 3, (Mar 2005):pp. (G447-456), 0193-1857 (Print) Chen C, Yu R, Owuor ED & Kong AN (2000) Activation of antioxidant-response element (ARE), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and caspases by major green tea polyphenol components during cell survival and death. Arch Pharm Res. Vol. 23, No. 6, (Dec 2000):pp. (605-612), 0253-6269 (Print) Chen CJ, Raung SL, Liao SL & Chen SY (2004) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by baicalein in endotoxin/cytokine-stimulated microglia. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 67, No. 5, (Mar 1 2004):pp. (957-965), 0006-2952 (Print) Chen J, Tang XQ, Zhi JL, Cui Y, Yu HM, Tang EH, Sun SN, Feng JQ & Chen PX (2006) Curcumin protects PC12 cells against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced apoptosis by bcl-2-mitochondria-ROS-iNOS pathway. Apoptosis. Vol. 11, No. 6, (Jun 2006):pp. (943-953), 1360-8185 (Print) Chen JC, Ho FM, Pei-Dawn Lee C, Chen CP, Jeng KC, Hsu HB, Lee ST, Wen Tung W & Lin WW (2005) Inhibition of iNOS gene expression by quercetin is mediated by the inhibition of IkappaB kinase, nuclear factor-kappa B and STAT1, and depends on heme oxygenase-1 induction in mouse BV-2 microglia. Eur J Pharmacol. Vol. 521, No. 1-3, (Oct 3 2005):pp. (9-20), 0014-2999 (Print) Chen L, Lee MJ, Li H & Yang CS (1997) Absorption, distribution, elimination of tea polyphenols in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. Vol. 25, No. 9, (Sep 1997):pp. (1045-1050), 0090-9556 (Print) Chen YR & Tan TH (1998) Inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway by curcumin. Oncogene. Vol. 17, No. 2, (Jul 16 1998):pp. (173-178), 09509232 (Print) Cheng TC, Lin CS, Hsu CC, Chen LJ, Cheng KC & Cheng JT (2009) Activation of muscarinic M-1 cholinoceptors by curcumin to increase glucose uptake into skeletal muscle isolated from Wistar rats. Neurosci Lett. Vol. 465, No. 3, (Nov 20 2009):pp. (238-241), 1872-7972 (Electronic) Cheynier V (2005) Polyphenols in foods are more complex than often thought. Am J Clin Nutr. Vol. 81, No. 1 Suppl, (Jan 2005):pp. (223S-229S), 0002-9165 (Print) Choi JY, Park CS, Kim DJ, Cho MH, Jin BK, Pie JE & Chung WG (2002) Prevention of nitric oxide-mediated 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced Parkinson's disease in mice by tea phenolic epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Neurotoxicology. Vol. 23, No. 3, (Sep 2002):pp. (367-374), 0161-813X (Print) Coffer PJ, Jin J & Woodgett JR (1998) Protein kinase B (c-Akt): a multifunctional mediator of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. Biochem J. Vol. 335 ( Pt 1), No. (Oct 1 1998):pp. (1-13), 0264-6021 (Print) Conseil G, Baubichon-Cortay H, Dayan G, Jault JM, Barron D & Di Pietro A (1998) Flavonoids: a class of modulators with bifunctional interactions at vicinal ATP- and steroid-binding sites on mouse P-glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 95, No. 17, (Aug 18 1998):pp. (9831-9836), 0027-8424 (Print)


137

D'Archivio M, Filesi C, Di Benedetto R, Gargiulo R, Giovannini C & Masella R (2007) Polyphenols, dietary sources and bioavailability. Ann Ist Super Sanita. Vol. 43, No. 4, 2007):pp. (348-361), 0021-2571 (Print) Dale WM & Russell C (1956) A study of the irradiation of catalase by ionizing radiations in the presence of cysteine, cystine and glutathione. Biochem J. Vol. 62, No. 1, (Jan 1956):pp. (50-57), 0264-6021 (Print) Davis RJ (1999) Signal transduction by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Biochem Soc Symp. Vol. 64, No. 1999):pp. (1-12), 0067-8694 (Print) Dickinson DA, Iles KE, Zhang H, Blank V & Forman HJ (2003) Curcumin alters EpRE and AP-1 binding complexes and elevates glutamate-cysteine ligase gene expression. FASEB J. Vol. 17, No. 3, (Mar 2003):pp. (473-475), 1530-6860 (Electronic) Dikshit M, Rastogi L, Shukla R & Srimal RC (1995) Prevention of ischaemia-induced biochemical changes by curcumin & quinidine in the cat heart. Indian J Med Res. Vol. 101, No. (Jan 1995):pp. (31-35), 0971-5916 (Print) Duvoix A, Blasius R, Delhalle S, Schnekenburger M, Morceau F, Henry E, Dicato M & Diederich M (2005) Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of curcumin. Cancer Lett. Vol. 223, No. 2, (Jun 8 2005):pp. (181-190), 0304-3835 (Print) Ejaz A, Wu D, Kwan P & Meydani M (2009) Curcumin inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and angiogenesis and obesity in C57/BL mice. J Nutr. Vol. 139, No. 5, (May 2009):pp. (919-925), 1541-6100 (Electronic) Finkel T, Deng C-X & Mostoslavsky R (2009) Recent progress in the biology and physiology of sirtuins. Nature. Vol. 460, No. 7255, 2009):pp. (587-591), 0028-0836 Frankel EN, Waterhouse AL & Kinsella JE (1993) Inhibition of human LDL oxidation by resveratrol. Lancet. Vol. 341, No. 8852, (Apr 24 1993):pp. (1103-1104), 0140-6736 (Print) Fremont L (2000) Biological effects of resveratrol. Life Sci. Vol. 66, No. 8, (Jan 14 2000):pp. (663-673), 0024-3205 (Print) Frozza RL, Bernardi A, Paese K, Hoppe JB, da Silva T, Battastini AM, Pohlmann AR, Guterres SS & Salbego C (2010) Characterization of trans-resveratrol-loaded lipidcore nanocapsules and tissue distribution studies in rats. J Biomed Nanotechnol. Vol. 6, No. 6, (Dec 2010):pp. (694-703), 1550-7033 (Print) Fukumoto LR & Mazza G (2000) Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. Vol. 48, No. 8, (Aug 2000):pp. (3597-3604), 00218561 (Print) Gamet-Payrastre L, Manenti S, Gratacap MP, Tulliez J, Chap H & Payrastre B (1999) Flavonoids and the inhibition of PKC and PI 3-kinase. Gen Pharmacol. Vol. 32, No. 3, (Mar 1999):pp. (279-286), 0306-3623 (Print) Ganguli M, Chandra V, Kamboh MI, Johnston JM, Dodge HH, Thelma BK, Juyal RC, Pandav R, Belle SH & DeKosky ST (2000) Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and Alzheimer disease: The Indo-US Cross-National Dementia Study. Arch Neurol. Vol. 57, No. 6, (Jun 2000):pp. (824-830), 0003-9942 (Print) Garcea G, Jones DJ, Singh R, Dennison AR, Farmer PB, Sharma RA, Steward WP, Gescher AJ & Berry DP (2004) Detection of curcumin and its metabolites in hepatic tissue and portal blood of patients following oral administration. Br J Cancer. Vol. 90, No. 5, (Mar 8 2004):pp. (1011-1015), 0007-0920 (Print)

138


Gelinas S & Martinoli MG (2002) Neuroprotective effect of estradiol and phytoestrogens on MPP+-induced cytotoxicity in neuronal PC12 cells. J Neurosci Res. Vol. 70, No. 1, (Oct 1 2002):pp. (90-96), 0360-4012 (Print) Gerlach M, Ben-Shachar D, Riederer P & Youdim MB (1994) Altered brain metabolism of iron as a cause of neurodegenerative diseases? J Neurochem. Vol. 63, No. 3, (Sep 1994):pp. (793-807), 0022-3042 (Print) Gordon,R. (2010). Resveratrol Protects Dopaminergic Neurons in Parkinson’s Disease Models by Modulating the PKC-delta Apoptotic Signaling Pathway & Microglial Activation (24:763.5) Proceedings of FASEB meeting, 0892-6638, conference location, April, 2010 Grinberg LN, Newmark H, Kitrossky N, Rahamim E, Chevion M & Rachmilewitz EA (1997) Protective effects of tea polyphenols against oxidative damage to red blood cells. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 54, No. 9, (Nov 1 1997):pp. (973-978), 0006-2952 (Print) Guo S, Bezard E & Zhao B (2005) Protective effect of green tea polyphenols on the SH-SY5Y cells against 6-OHDA induced apoptosis through ROS-NO pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 39, No. 5, (Sep 1 2005):pp. (682-695), 0891-5849 (Print) Guo S, Yan J, Yang T, Yang X, Bezard E & Zhao B (2007) Protective effects of green tea polyphenols in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson's disease through inhibition of ROS-NO pathway. Biol Psychiatry. Vol. 62, No. 12, (Dec 15 2007):pp. (1353-1362), 1873-2402 (Electronic) Gupta NK & Dixit VK (2011a) Development and evaluation of vesicular system for curcumin delivery. Arch Dermatol Res. Vol. 303, No. 2, (Mar 2011a):pp. (89-101), 1432-069X (Electronic) Gupta NK & Dixit VK (2011b) Bioavailability enhancement of curcumin by complexation with phosphatidyl choline. J Pharm Sci. Vol. 100, No. 5, (May 2011b):pp. (19871995), 1520-6017 (Electronic) Han X, Shen T & Lou H (2007) Dietary Polyphenols and Their Biological Significance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 9, 2007):pp. (950-988), 14220067 Harada M, Kan Y, Naoki H, Fukui Y, Kageyama N, Nakai M, Miki W & Kiso Y (1999) Identification of the major antioxidative metabolites in biological fluids of the rat with ingested (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. Vol. 63, No. 6, (Jun 1999):pp. (973-977), 0916-8451 (Print) Harborne JB & Williams CA (2000) Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry. Vol. 55, No. 6, (Nov 2000):pp. (481-504), 0031-9422 (Print) Harikumar KB & Aggarwal BB (2008) Resveratrol: a multitargeted agent for age-associated chronic diseases. Cell Cycle. Vol. 7, No. 8, (Apr 15 2008):pp. (1020-1035), 1551-4005 (Electronic) Harish G, Venkateshappa C, Mythri RB, Dubey SK, Mishra K, Singh N, Vali S & Bharath MM (2010) Bioconjugates of curcumin display improved protection against glutathione depletion mediated oxidative stress in a dopaminergic neuronal cell line: Implications for Parkinson's disease. Bioorg Med Chem. Vol. 18, No. 7, (Apr 1 2010):pp. (2631-2638), 1464-3391 (Electronic)


139

Higdon JV & Frei B (2003) Tea catechins and polyphenols: health effects, metabolism, and antioxidant functions. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. Vol. 43, No. 1, 2003):pp. (89-143), 1040-8398 (Print) Hou RR, Chen JZ, Chen H, Kang XG, Li MG & Wang BR (2008) Neuroprotective effects of ()-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on paraquat-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. Cell Biol Int. Vol. 32, No. 1, (Jan 2008):pp. (22-30), 1065-6995 (Print) Hu G, Bidel S, Jousilahti P, Antikainen R & Tuomilehto J (2007) Coffee and tea consumption and the risk of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. Vol. 22, No. 15, (Nov 15 2007):pp. (2242-2248), 0885-3185 (Print) Huang Q, Wu LJ, Tashiro S, Gao HY, Onodera S & Ikejima T (2005) (+)-Catechin, an ingredient of green tea, protects murine microglia from oxidative stress-induced DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. J Pharmacol Sci. Vol. 98, No. 1, (May 2005):pp. (16-24), 1347-8613 (Print) Huang TS, Lee SC & Lin JK (1991) Suppression of c-Jun/AP-1 activation by an inhibitor of tumor promotion in mouse fibroblast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 88, No. 12, (Jun 15 1991):pp. (5292-5296), 0027-8424 (Print) Huguet AI, Manez S & Alcaraz MJ (1990) Superoxide scavenging properties of flavonoids in a non-enzymic system. Z Naturforsch C. Vol. 45, No. 1-2, (Jan-Feb 1990):pp. (19-24), 0939-5075 (Print) Hung CW, Chen YC, Hsieh WL, Chiou SH & Kao CL (2010) Ageing and neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. Vol. 9 Suppl 1, No. (Nov 2010):pp. (S36-46), 1872-9649 (Electronic) Ishikawa Y & Kitamura M (2000) Anti-apoptotic effect of quercetin: intervention in the JNKand ERK-mediated apoptotic pathways. Kidney Int. Vol. 58, No. 3, (Sep 2000):pp. (1078-1087), 0085-2538 (Print) 0085-2538 (Linking) Iwunze MO & McEwan D (2004) Peroxynitrite interaction with curcumin solubilized in ethanolic solution. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). Vol. 50, No. 6, (Sep 2004):pp. (749752), 0145-5680 (Print) Jagatha B, Mythri RB, Vali S & Bharath MM (2008) Curcumin treatment alleviates the effects of glutathione depletion in vitro and in vivo: therapeutic implications for Parkinson's disease explained via in silico studies. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 44, No. 5, (Mar 1 2008):pp. (907-917), 0891-5849 (Print) Jang EM, Choi MS, Jung UJ, Kim MJ, Kim HJ, Jeon SM, Shin SK, Seong CN & Lee MK (2008) Beneficial effects of curcumin on hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance in high-fatfed hamsters. Metabolism. Vol. 57, No. 11, (Nov 2008):pp. (1576-1583), 1532-8600 (Electronic) Jeyapaul J & Jaiswal AK (2000) Nrf2 and c-Jun regulation of antioxidant response element (ARE)-mediated expression and induction of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase heavy subunit gene. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 59, No. 11, (Jun 1 2000):pp. (1433-1439), 0006-2952 (Print) Jiao Y, Wilkinson Jt, Christine Pietsch E, Buss JL, Wang W, Planalp R, Torti FM & Torti SV (2006) Iron chelation in the biological activity of curcumin. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 40, No. 7, (Apr 1 2006):pp. (1152-1160), 0891-5849 (Print) Jiao Y, Wilkinson Jt, Di X, Wang W, Hatcher H, Kock ND, D'Agostino R, Jr., Knovich MA, Torti FM & Torti SV (2009) Curcumin, a cancer chemopreventive and

140


chemotherapeutic agent, is a biologically active iron chelator. Blood. Vol. 113, No. 2, (Jan 8 2009):pp. (462-469), 1528-0020 (Electronic) Jin CF, Shen SR, Sr. & Zhao BL (2001) Different effects of five catechins on 6hydroxydopamine-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. J Agric Food Chem. Vol. 49, No. 12, (Dec 2001):pp. (6033-6038), 0021-8561 (Print) Jin F, Wu Q, Lu YF, Gong QH & Shi JS (2008) Neuroprotective effect of resveratrol on 6OHDA-induced Parkinson's disease in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. Vol. 600, No. 1-3, (Dec 14 2008):pp. (78-82), 1879-0712 (Electronic) Jobin C, Bradham CA, Russo MP, Juma B, Narula AS, Brenner DA & Sartor RB (1999) Curcumin blocks cytokine-mediated NF-kappa B activation and proinflammatory gene expression by inhibiting inhibitory factor I-kappa B kinase activity. J Immunol. Vol. 163, No. 6, (Sep 15 1999):pp. (3474-3483), 0022-1767 (Print) Kandinov B, Giladi N & Korczyn AD (2007) The effect of cigarette smoking, tea, and coffee consumption on the progression of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Vol. 13, No. 4, (May 2007):pp. (243-245), 1353-8020 (Print) Kandinov B, Giladi N & Korczyn AD (2009) Smoking and tea consumption delay onset of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Vol. 15, No. 1, (Jan 2009):pp. (41-46), 1353-8020 (Print) Kang KS, Wen Y, Yamabe N, Fukui M, Bishop SC & Zhu BT (2010) Dual beneficial effects of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on levodopa methylation and hippocampal neurodegeneration: in vitro and in vivo studies. PLoS One. Vol. 5, No. 8, 2010):pp. (e11951), 1932-6203 (Electronic) Kantengwa S & Polla BS (1991) Flavonoids, but not protein kinase C inhibitors, prevent stress protein synthesis during erythrophagocytosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Vol. 180, No. 1, (Oct 15 1991):pp. (308-314), 0006-291X (Print) Karuppagounder SS, Pinto JT, Xu H, Chen HL, Beal MF & Gibson GE (2009) Dietary supplementation with resveratrol reduces plaque pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int. Vol. 54, No. 2, (Feb 2009):pp. (111-118), 01970186 (Print) Khan MM, Ahmad A, Ishrat T, Khan MB, Hoda MN, Khuwaja G, Raza SS, Khan A, Javed H, Vaibhav K & Islam F (2010) Resveratrol attenuates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced oxidative damage and dopamine depletion in rat model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. Vol. 1328, No. (Apr 30 2010):pp. (139-151), 1872-6240 (Electronic) Khopde SM, Priyadarsini KI, Guha SN, Satav JG, Venkatesan P & Rao MN (2000) Inhibition of radiation-induced lipid peroxidation by tetrahydrocurcumin: possible mechanisms by pulse radiolysis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. Vol. 64, No. 3, (Mar 2000):pp. (503-509), 0916-8451 (Print) Kim H, Kim YS, Kim SY & Suk K (2001) The plant flavonoid wogonin suppresses death of activated C6 rat glial cells by inhibiting nitric oxide production. Neurosci Lett. Vol. 309, No. 1, (Aug 17 2001):pp. (67-71), 0304-3940 (Print) Kim JS, Kim JM, O JJ & Jeon BS (2010) Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and cell death by (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, a green tea catechin, in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurosci. Vol. 17, No. 9, (Sep 2010):pp. (1165-1168), 1532-2653 (Electronic)


141

Kim SJ, Son TG, Park HR, Park M, Kim MS, Kim HS, Chung HY, Mattson MP & Lee J (2008) Curcumin stimulates proliferation of embryonic neural progenitor cells and neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. J Biol Chem. Vol. 283, No. 21, (May 23 2008):pp. (14497-14505), 0021-9258 (Print) Klinge CM, Blankenship KA, Risinger KE, Bhatnagar S, Noisin EL, Sumanasekera WK, Zhao L, Brey DM & Keynton RS (2005) Resveratrol and estradiol rapidly activate MAPK signaling through estrogen receptors alpha and beta in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. Vol. 280, No. 9, (Mar 4 2005):pp. (7460-7468), 0021-9258 (Print) Kobuchi H, Roy S, Sen CK, Nguyen HG & Packer L (1999) Quercetin inhibits inducible ICAM-1 expression in human endothelial cells through the JNK pathway. Am J Physiol. Vol. 277, No. 3 Pt 1, (Sep 1999):pp. (C403-411), 0002-9513 (Print) Kong AN, Yu R, Chen C, Mandlekar S & Primiano T (2000) Signal transduction events elicited by natural products: role of MAPK and caspase pathways in homeostatic response and induction of apoptosis. Arch Pharm Res. Vol. 23, No. 1, (Feb 2000):pp. (1-16), 0253-6269 (Print) Kovacic P & Somanathan R (2010) Multifaceted approach to resveratrol bioactivity: Focus on antioxidant action, cell signaling and safety. Oxid Med Cell Longev. Vol. 3, No. 2, (Mar-Apr 2010):pp. (86-100), 1942-0994 (Electronic) Kumar A, Naidu PS, Seghal N & Padi SS (2007) Effect of curcumin on intracerebroventricular colchicine-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in rats. J Med Food. Vol. 10, No. 3, (Sep 2007):pp. (486-494), 1096-620X (Print) Kumar V (2006) Potential medicinal plants for CNS disorders: an overview. Phytother Res. Vol. 20, No. 12, (Dec 2006):pp. (1023-1035), 0951-418X (Print) Lamuela-Raventos RM, Romero-Perez AI, Waterhouse AL & de la Torre-Boronat MC (1995) Direct HPLC Analysis of cis- and trans-Resveratrol and Piceid Isomers in Spanish Red Vitis vinifera Wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. Vol. 43, No. 2, 1995):pp. (281-283), 0021-8561 Lao CD, Ruffin MTt, Normolle D, Heath DD, Murray SI, Bailey JM, Boggs ME, Crowell J, Rock CL & Brenner DE (2006) Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation. BMC Complement Altern Med. Vol. 6, No. 2006):pp. (10), 1472-6882 (Electronic) LaVoie MJ, Ostaszewski BL, Weihofen A, Schlossmacher MG & Selkoe DJ (2005) Dopamine covalently modifies and functionally inactivates parkin. Nat Med. Vol. 11, No. 11, (Nov 2005):pp. (1214-1221), 1078-8956 (Print) Lavoie S, Chen Y, Dalton TP, Gysin R, Cuenod M, Steullet P & Do KQ (2009) Curcumin, quercetin, and tBHQ modulate glutathione levels in astrocytes and neurons: importance of the glutamate cysteine ligase modifier subunit. J Neurochem. Vol. 108, No. 6, (Mar 2009):pp. (1410-1422), 1471-4159 (Electronic) Leaver KR, Allbutt HN, Creber NJ, Kassiou M & Henderson JM (2009) Oral pre-treatment with epigallocatechin gallate in 6-OHDA lesioned rats produces subtle symptomatic relief but not neuroprotection. Brain Res Bull. Vol. 80, No. 6, (Dec 16 2009):pp. (397-402), 1873-2747 (Electronic) Lee H, Kim YO, Kim H, Kim SY, Noh HS, Kang SS, Cho GJ, Choi WS & Suk K (2003) Flavonoid wogonin from medicinal herb is neuroprotective by inhibiting inflammatory activation of microglia. FASEB J. Vol. 17, No. 13, (Oct 2003):pp. (19431944), 1530-6860 (Electronic)

142


Lee MK, Kang SJ, Poncz M, Song KJ & Park KS (2007) Resveratrol protects SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells from apoptosis induced by dopamine. Exp Mol Med. Vol. 39, No. 3, (Jun 30 2007):pp. (376-384), 1226-3613 (Print) Lee S, Suh S & Kim S (2000) Protective effects of the green tea polyphenol (-)epigallocatechin gallate against hippocampal neuronal damage after transient global ischemia in gerbils. Neurosci Lett. Vol. 287, No. 3, (Jun 30 2000):pp. (191-194), 0304-3940 (Print) Levites Y, Amit T, Youdim MB & Mandel S (2002a) Involvement of protein kinase C activation and cell survival/ cell cycle genes in green tea polyphenol (-)epigallocatechin 3-gallate neuroprotective action. J Biol Chem. Vol. 277, No. 34, (Aug 23 2002a):pp. (30574-30580), 0021-9258 (Print) Levites Y, Weinreb O, Maor G, Youdim MB & Mandel S (2001) Green tea polyphenol (-)epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridineinduced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J Neurochem. Vol. 78, No. 5, (Sep 2001):pp. (1073-1082), 0022-3042 (Print) Levites Y, Youdim MB, Maor G & Mandel S (2002b) Attenuation of 6-hydroxydopamine (6OHDA)-induced nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activation and cell death by tea extracts in neuronal cultures. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 63, No. 1, (Jan 1 2002b):pp. (21-29), 0006-2952 (Print) Li C, Lee MJ, Sheng S, Meng X, Prabhu S, Winnik B, Huang B, Chung JY, Yan S, Ho CT & Yang CS (2000) Structural identification of two metabolites of catechins and their kinetics in human urine and blood after tea ingestion. Chem Res Toxicol. Vol. 13, No. 3, (Mar 2000):pp. (177-184), 0893-228X (Print) Li R, Huang YG, Fang D & Le WD (2004) (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation and protects against inflammation-mediated dopaminergic neuronal injury. J Neurosci Res. Vol. 78, No. 5, (Dec 1 2004):pp. (723-731), 0360-4012 (Print) Li R, Peng N, Du F, Li XP & Le WD (2006) Epigallocatechin gallate protects dopaminergic neurons against 1-methyl-4phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced neurotoxicity by inhibiting microglial cell activation. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. Vol. 26, No. 4, (Apr 2006):pp. (376-380), 1673-4254 (Print) Li X, Jankovic J & Le W (2010) Iron chelation and neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Neural Transmission. Vol., No. 2010):pp. (1-5), 0300-9564 Lim GP, Chu T, Yang F, Beech W, Frautschy SA & Cole GM (2001) The curry spice curcumin reduces oxidative damage and amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic mouse. J Neurosci. Vol. 21, No. 21, (Nov 1 2001):pp. (8370-8377), 1529-2401 (Electronic) Liou HH, Chen RC, Chen TH, Tsai YF & Tsai MC (2001) Attenuation of paraquat-induced dopaminergic toxicity on the substantia nigra by (-)-deprenyl in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Vol. 172, No. 1, (Apr 1 2001):pp. (37-43), 0041-008X (Print) Long J, Gao H, Sun L, Liu J & Zhao-Wilson X (2009) Grape extract protects mitochondria from oxidative damage and improves locomotor dysfunction and extends lifespan in a Drosophila Parkinson's disease model. Rejuvenation Res. Vol. 12, No. 5, (Oct 2009):pp. (321-331), 1557-8577 (Electronic)


143

Lu F, Zahid M, Wang C, Saeed M, Cavalieri EL & Rogan EG (2008) Resveratrol prevents estrogen-DNA adduct formation and neoplastic transformation in MCF-10F cells. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). Vol. 1, No. 2, (Jul 2008):pp. (135-145), 1940-6215 (Electronic) Luo Y, Hattori A, Munoz J, Qin ZH & Roth GS (1999) Intrastriatal dopamine injection induces apoptosis through oxidation-involved activation of transcription factors AP-1 and NF-kappaB in rats. Mol Pharmacol. Vol. 56, No. 2, (Aug 1999):pp. (254264), 0026-895X (Print) Mandel S, Maor G & Youdim MB (2004) Iron and alpha-synuclein in the substantia nigra of MPTP-treated mice: effect of neuroprotective drugs R-apomorphine and green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. J Mol Neurosci. Vol. 24, No. 3, 2004):pp. (401-416), 0895-8696 (Print) Mandel SA, Amit T, Kalfon L, Reznichenko L & Youdim MB (2008) Targeting multiple neurodegenerative diseases etiologies with multimodal-acting green tea catechins. J Nutr. Vol. 138, No. 8, (Aug 2008):pp. (1578S-1583S), 1541-6100 (Electronic) Mandel SA, Amit T, Weinreb O & Youdim MB (2011) Understanding the Broad-Spectrum Neuroprotective Action Profile of Green Tea Polyphenols in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases. J Alzheimers Dis. Vol., No. (Mar 2 2011):pp. 1875-8908 (Electronic) Matsuoka Y, Hasegawa H, Okuda S, Muraki T, Uruno T & Kubota K (1995) Ameliorative effects of tea catechins on active oxygen-related nerve cell injuries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Vol. 274, No. 2, (Aug 1995):pp. (602-608), 0022-3565 (Print) Matter WF, Brown RF & Vlahos CJ (1992) The inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by quercetin and analogs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Vol. 186, No. 2, (Jul 31 1992):pp. (624-631), 0006-291X (Print) Mattivi F, Reniero F & Korhammer S (1995) Isolation, Characterization, and Evolution in Red Wine Vinification of Resveratrol Monomers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. Vol. 43, No. 7, 1995):pp. (1820-1823), 0021-8561 Mattson MP, Son TG & Camandola S (2007) Viewpoint: mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of neurohormetic phytochemicals. Dose Response. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2007):pp. (174-186), 1559-3258 (Electronic) Mazzio E, Huber J, Darling S, Harris N & Soliman KF (2001) Effect of antioxidants on Lglutamate and N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion induced-neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Neurotoxicology. Vol. 22, No. 2, (Apr 2001):pp. (283-288), 0161-813X (Print) Mishra B, Priyadarsini KI, Bhide MK, Kadam RM & Mohan H (2004) Reactions of superoxide radicals with curcumin: probable mechanisms by optical spectroscopy and EPR. Free Radic Res. Vol. 38, No. 4, (Apr 2004):pp. (355-362), 1071-5762 (Print) Moldzio R, Radad K, Krewenka C, Kranner B, Duvigneau JC, Wang Y & Rausch WD (2010) Effects of epigallocatechin gallate on rotenone-injured murine brain cultures. J Neural Transm. Vol. 117, No. 1, (Jan 2010):pp. (5-12), 1435-1463 (Electronic) Molina MF, Sanchez-Reus I, Iglesias I & Benedi J (2003) Quercetin, a flavonoid antioxidant, prevents and protects against ethanol-induced oxidative stress in mouse liver. Biol Pharm Bull. Vol. 26, No. 10, (Oct 2003):pp. (1398-1402), 0918-6158 (Print) Motterlini R, Foresti R, Bassi R & Green CJ (2000) Curcumin, an antioxidant and antiinflammatory agent, induces heme oxygenase-1 and protects endothelial cells against oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 28, No. 8, (Apr 15 2000):pp. (13031312), 0891-5849 (Print)

144


Muthane U, Yasha TC & Shankar SK (1998) Low numbers and no loss of melanized nigral neurons with increasing age in normal human brains from India. Ann Neurol. Vol. 43, No. 3, (Mar 1998):pp. (283-287), 0364-5134 (Print) Mythri RB, Harish G, Dubey SK, Misra K & Bharath MM (2011) Glutamoyl diester of the dietary polyphenol curcumin offers improved protection against peroxynitritemediated nitrosative stress and damage of brain mitochondria in vitro: implications for Parkinson's disease. Mol Cell Biochem. Vol. 347, No. 1-2, (Jan 2011):pp. (135-143), 1573-4919 (Electronic) Mythri RB, Jagatha B, Pradhan N, Andersen J & Bharath MM (2007) Mitochondrial complex I inhibition in Parkinson's disease: how can curcumin protect mitochondria? Antioxid Redox Signal. Vol. 9, No. 3, (Mar 2007):pp. (399-408), 1523-0864 (Print) Nie G, Cao Y & Zhao B (2002) Protective effects of green tea polyphenols and their major component, (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. Redox Rep. Vol. 7, No. 3, 2002):pp. (171-177), 1351-0002 (Print) North BJ & Verdin E (2004) Sirtuins: Sir2-related NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. Genome Biol. Vol. 5, No. 5, 2004):pp. (224), 1465-6914 (Electronic) Ohara K, Mizukami, W., Tokunaga, A., Nagaoka, S., Uno, H., and Mukai (2005) Kinetic Study of the Mechanism of Free-Radical Scavenging Action in Curcumin: Effects of Solvent and pH. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. Vol. 78, No. 4, 2005):pp. (615-621), 0009-2673 Okawara M, Katsuki H, Kurimoto E, Shibata H, Kume T & Akaike A (2007) Resveratrol protects dopaminergic neurons in midbrain slice culture from multiple insults. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 73, No. 4, (Feb 15 2007):pp. (550-560), 0006-2952 (Print) Oliver CN, Starke-Reed PE, Stadtman ER, Liu GJ, Carney JM & Floyd RA (1990) Oxidative damage to brain proteins, loss of glutamine synthetase activity, and production of free radicals during ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury to gerbil brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 87, No. 13, (Jul 1990):pp. (5144-5147), 0027-8424 (Print) Ono K & Yamada M (2006) Antioxidant compounds have potent anti-fibrillogenic and fibrildestabilizing effects for alpha-synuclein fibrils in vitro. J Neurochem. Vol. 97, No. 1, (Apr 2006):pp. (105-115), 0022-3042 (Print) Outeiro TF, Kontopoulos E, Altmann SM, Kufareva I, Strathearn KE, Amore AM, Volk CB, Maxwell MM, Rochet JC, McLean PJ, Young AB, Abagyan R, Feany MB, Hyman BT & Kazantsev AG (2007) Sirtuin 2 inhibitors rescue alpha-synuclein-mediated toxicity in models of Parkinson's disease. Science. Vol. 317, No. 5837, (Jul 27 2007):pp. (516-519), 1095-9203 (Electronic) Pallas M, Casadesus G, Smith MA, Coto-Montes A, Pelegri C, Vilaplana J & Camins A (2009) Resveratrol and neurodegenerative diseases: activation of SIRT1 as the potential pathway towards neuroprotection. Curr Neurovasc Res. Vol. 6, No. 1, (Feb 2009):pp. (70-81), 1875-5739 (Electronic) Pallas M, Verdaguer E, Tajes M, Gutierrez-Cuesta J & Camins A (2008) Modulation of sirtuins: new targets for antiageing. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. Vol. 3, No. 1, (Jan 2008):pp. (61-69), 1574-8898 (Print) Pan MH, Huang TM & Lin JK (1999) Biotransformation of curcumin through reduction and glucuronidation in mice. Drug Metab Dispos. Vol. 27, No. 4, (Apr 1999):pp. (486-494), 0090-9556 (Print)


145

Pan MH, Lin-Shiau SY & Lin JK (2000) Comparative studies on the suppression of nitric oxide synthase by curcumin and its hydrogenated metabolites through downregulation of IkappaB kinase and NFkappaB activation in macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 60, No. 11, (Dec 1 2000):pp. (1665-1676), 0006-2952 (Print) Pan T, Jankovic J & Le W (2003) Potential therapeutic properties of green tea polyphenols in Parkinson's disease. Drugs Aging. Vol. 20, No. 10, 2003):pp. (711-721), 1170-229X (Print) Pandey N, Strider J, Nolan WC, Yan SX & Galvin JE (2008) Curcumin inhibits aggregation of alpha-synuclein. Acta Neuropathol. Vol. 115, No. 4, (Apr 2008):pp. (479-489), 00016322 (Print) Peeyush KT, Gireesh G, Jobin M & Paulose CS (2009) Neuroprotective role of curcumin in the cerebellum of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Life Sci. Vol. 85, No. 19-20, (Nov 4 2009):pp. (704-710), 1879-0631 (Electronic) Pietta PG, Simonetti P, Gardana C, Brusamolino A, Morazzoni P & Bombardelli E (1998) Catechin metabolites after intake of green tea infusions. Biofactors. Vol. 8, No. 1-2, 1998):pp. (111-118), 0951-6433 (Print) Plummer SM, Holloway KA, Manson MM, Munks RJ, Kaptein A, Farrow S & Howells L (1999) Inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression in colon cells by the chemopreventive agent curcumin involves inhibition of NF-kappaB activation via the NIK/IKK signalling complex. Oncogene. Vol. 18, No. 44, (Oct 28 1999):pp. (60136020), 0950-9232 (Print) Priyadarsini KI, Maity DK, Naik GH, Kumar MS, Unnikrishnan MK, Satav JG & Mohan H (2003) Role of phenolic O-H and methylene hydrogen on the free radical reactions and antioxidant activity of curcumin. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 35, No. 5, (Sep 1 2003):pp. (475-484), 0891-5849 (Print) Qureshi S, Shah AH & Ageel AM (1992) Toxicity studies on Alpinia galanga and Curcuma longa. Planta Med. Vol. 58, No. 2, (Apr 1992):pp. (124-127), 0032-0943 (Print) Rajeswari A (2006) Curcumin protects mouse brain from oxidative stress caused by 1methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. Vol. 10, No. 4, (Jul-Aug 2006):pp. (157-161), 1128-3602 (Print) Rajeswari A & Sabesan M (2008) Inhibition of monoamine oxidase-B by the polyphenolic compound, curcumin and its metabolite tetrahydrocurcumin, in a model of Parkinson's disease induced by MPTP neurodegeneration in mice. Inflammopharmacology. Vol. 16, No. 2, (Apr 2008):pp. (96-99), 0925-4692 (Print) Ramassamy C (2006) Emerging role of polyphenolic compounds in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: A review of their intracellular targets. Eur J Pharmacol Vol. 545, No. 1, (Sep 2006): pp (51–64) Ray B, Bisht S, Maitra A & Lahiri DK (2011) Neuroprotective and neurorescue effects of a novel polymeric nanoparticle formulation of curcumin (NanoCurc) in the neuronal cell culture and animal model: implications for Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. Vol. 23, No. 1, (Jan 1 2011):pp. (61-77), 1875-8908 (Electronic) Raza H, John A, Brown EM, Benedict S & Kambal A (2008) Alterations in mitochondrial respiratory functions, redox metabolism and apoptosis by oxidant 4hydroxynonenal and antioxidants curcumin and melatonin in PC12 cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Vol. 226, No. 2, (Jan 15 2008):pp. (161-168), 0041-008X (Print)

146


Revuelta MP, Cantabrana B & Hidalgo A (1997) Depolarization-dependent effect of flavonoids in rat uterine smooth muscle contraction elicited by CaCl2. Gen Pharmacol. Vol. 29, No. 5, (Nov 1997):pp. (847-857), 0306-3623 (Print) Rice-Evans CA & Miller NJ (1996) Antioxidant activities of flavonoids as bioactive components of food. Biochem Soc Trans. Vol. 24, No. 3, (Aug 1996):pp. (790-795), 0300-5127 (Print) Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ & Paganga G (1996) Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 20, No. 7, 1996):pp. (933956), 0891-5849 (Print) Richard T, Pawlus AD, Iglesias ML, Pedrot E, Waffo-Teguo P, Merillon JM & Monti JP (2011) Neuroprotective properties of resveratrol and derivatives. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Vol. 1215, No. (Jan 2011):pp. (103-108), 1749-6632 (Electronic) Riederer P, Sofic E, Rausch WD, Schmidt B, Reynolds GP, Jellinger K & Youdim MB (1989) Transition metals, ferritin, glutathione, and ascorbic acid in parkinsonian brains. J Neurochem. Vol. 52, No. 2, (Feb 1989):pp. (515-520), 0022-3042 (Print) Rocha-Gonzalez HI, Ambriz-Tututi M & Granados-Soto V (2008) Resveratrol: a natural compound with pharmacological potential in neurodegenerative diseases. CNS Neurosci Ther. Vol. 14, No. 3, (Fall 2008):pp. (234-247), 1755-5930 (Print) Sahu SC & Gray GC (1997) Lipid peroxidation and DNA damage induced by morin and naringenin in isolated rat liver nuclei. Food Chem Toxicol. Vol. 35, No. 5, (May 1997):pp. (443-447), 0278-6915 (Print) Saiko P, Szakmary A, Jaeger W & Szekeres T (2008) Resveratrol and its analogs: defense against cancer, coronary disease and neurodegenerative maladies or just a fad? Mutat Res. Vol. 658, No. 1-2, (Jan-Feb 2008):pp. (68-94), 0027-5107 (Print) Sawada H, Ibi M, Kihara T, Honda K, Nakamizo T, Kanki R, Nakanishi M, Sakka N, Akaike A & Shimohama S (2002) Estradiol protects dopaminergic neurons in a MPP+Parkinson's disease model. Neuropharmacology. Vol. 42, No. 8, (Jun 2002):pp. (1056-1064), 0028-3908 (Print) Scalbert A & Williamson G (2000) Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J Nutr. Vol. 130, No. 8S Suppl, (Aug 2000):pp. (2073S-2085S), 0022-3166 (Print) Schroeter H, Bahia P, Spencer JP, Sheppard O, Rattray M, Cadenas E, Rice-Evans C & Williams RJ (2007) (-)Epicatechin stimulates ERK-dependent cyclic AMP response element activity and up-regulates GluR2 in cortical neurons. J Neurochem. Vol. 101, No. 6, (Jun 2007):pp. (1596-1606), 0022-3042 (Print) Schroeter H, Boyd C, Spencer JP, Williams RJ, Cadenas E & Rice-Evans C (2002) MAPK signaling in neurodegeneration: influences of flavonoids and of nitric oxide. Neurobiol Aging. Vol. 23, No. 5, (Sep-Oct 2002):pp. (861-880), 0197-4580 (Print) Schroeter H, Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C & Williams RJ (2001) Flavonoids protect neurons from oxidized low-density-lipoprotein-induced apoptosis involving c-Jun Nterminal kinase (JNK), c-Jun and caspase-3. Biochem J. Vol. 358, No. Pt 3, (Sep 15 2001):pp. (547-557), 0264-6021 (Print) Schroeter H, Williams RJ, Matin R, Iversen L & Rice-Evans CA (2000) Phenolic antioxidants attenuate neuronal cell death following uptake of oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 29, No. 12, (Dec 15 2000):pp. (1222-1233), 0891-5849 (Print)


147

Shankar TN, Shantha NV, Ramesh HP, Murthy IA & Murthy VS (1980) Toxicity studies on turmeric (Curcuma longa): acute toxicity studies in rats, guineapigs & monkeys. Indian J Exp Biol. Vol. 18, No. 1, (Jan 1980):pp. (73-75), 0019-5189 (Print) Sharma S, Kulkarni SK, Agrewala JN & Chopra K (2006) Curcumin attenuates thermal hyperalgesia in a diabetic mouse model of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. Vol. 536, No. 3, (May 1 2006):pp. (256-261), 0014-2999 (Print) Shen SC, Lee WR, Lin HY, Huang HC, Ko CH, Yang LL & Chen YC (2002) In vitro and in vivo inhibitory activities of rutin, wogonin, and quercetin on lipopolysaccharideinduced nitric oxide and prostaglandin E(2) production. Eur J Pharmacol. Vol. 446, No. 1-3, (Jun 20 2002):pp. (187-194), 0014-2999 (Print) Shen SQ, Zhang Y, Xiang JJ & Xiong CL (2007) Protective effect of curcumin against liver warm ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat model is associated with regulation of heat shock protein and antioxidant enzymes. World J Gastroenterol. Vol. 13, No. 13, (Apr 7 2007):pp. (1953-1961), 1007-9327 (Print) Shishodia S, Sethi G & Aggarwal BB (2005) Curcumin: getting back to the roots. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Vol. 1056, No. (Nov 2005):pp. (206-217), 0077-8923 (Print) Shoba G, Joy D, Joseph T, Majeed M, Rajendran R & Srinivas PS (1998) Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Med. Vol. 64, No. 4, (May 1998):pp. (353-356), 0032-0943 (Print) Sinha R, Anderson DE, McDonald SS & Greenwald P (2003) Cancer risk and diet in India. J Postgrad Med. Vol. 49, No. 3, (Jul-Sep 2003):pp. (222-228), 0022-3859 (Print) Sofic E, Riederer P, Heinsen H, Beckmann H, Reynolds GP, Hebenstreit G & Youdim MB (1988) Increased iron (III) and total iron content in post mortem substantia nigra of parkinsonian brain. J Neural Transm. Vol. 74, No. 3, 1988):pp. (199-205), 0300-9564 (Print) Spencer JP (2003) Metabolism of tea flavonoids in the gastrointestinal tract. J Nutr. Vol. 133, No. 10, (Oct 2003):pp. (3255S-3261S), 0022-3166 (Print) Spencer JP (2007) The interactions of flavonoids within neuronal signalling pathways. Genes Nutr. Vol. 2, No. 3, (Dec 2007):pp. (257-273), 1555-8932 (Print) Spencer JP, Abd-el-Mohsen MM & Rice-Evans C (2004) Cellular uptake and metabolism of flavonoids and their metabolites: implications for their bioactivity. Arch Biochem Biophys. Vol. 423, No. 1, (Mar 1 2004):pp. (148-161), 0003-9861 (Print) Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C & Williams RJ (2003) Modulation of pro-survival Akt/protein kinase B and ERK1/2 signaling cascades by quercetin and its in vivo metabolites underlie their action on neuronal viability. J Biol Chem. Vol. 278, No. 37, (Sep 12 2003):pp. (34783-34793), 0021-9258 (Print) Srinivasan K (2005) Plant foods in the management of diabetes mellitus: spices as beneficial antidiabetic food adjuncts. Int J Food Sci Nutr. Vol. 56, No. 6, (Sep 2005):pp. (399414), 0963-7486 (Print) Stridh MH, Correa F, Nodin C, Weber SG, Blomstrand F, Nilsson M & Sandberg M (2010) Enhanced glutathione efflux from astrocytes in culture by low extracellular ca(2+) and curcumin. Neurochem Res. Vol. 35, No. 8, (Aug 2010):pp. (1231-1238), 1573-6903 (Electronic) Sugihara N, Arakawa T, Ohnishi M & Furuno K (1999) Anti- and pro-oxidative effects of flavonoids on metal-induced lipid hydroperoxide-dependent lipid peroxidation in

148


cultured hepatocytes loaded with alpha-linolenic acid. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 27, No. 11-12, (Dec 1999):pp. (1313-1323), 0891-5849 (Print) Suresh D & Srinivasan K (2010) Tissue distribution & elimination of capsaicin, piperine & curcumin following oral intake in rats. Indian J Med Res. Vol. 131, No. (May 2010):pp. (682-691), 0971-5916 (Print) Tai KK & Truong DD (2010) (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a green tea polyphenol, reduces dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT)-induced cell death in dopaminergic SHSY-5Y cells. Neurosci Lett. Vol. 482, No. 3, (Oct 4 2010):pp. (183187), 1872-7972 (Electronic) Tan EK, Tan C, Fook-Chong SMC, Lum SY, Chai A, Chung H, Shen H, Zhao Y, Teoh ML, Yih Y, Pavanni R, Chandran VR & Wong MC (2003) Dose-dependent protective effect of coffee, tea, and smoking in Parkinson's disease: a study in ethnic Chinese. Journal of the neurological sciences. Vol. 216, No. 1, 2003):pp. (163-167), 0022-510X Tan LC, Koh W-P, Yuan J-M, Wang R, Au W-L, Tan JH, Tan E-K & Yu MC (2008) Differential Effects of Black versus Green Tea on Risk of Parkinson's Disease in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. Vol. 167, No. 5, (March 1, 2008 2008):pp. (553-560), Thaloor D, Miller KJ, Gephart J, Mitchell PO & Pavlath GK (1999) Systemic administration of the NF-kappaB inhibitor curcumin stimulates muscle regeneration after traumatic injury. Am J Physiol. Vol. 277, No. 2 Pt 1, (Aug 1999):pp. (C320-329), 0002-9513 (Print) Thiyagarajan M & Sharma SS (2004) Neuroprotective effect of curcumin in middle cerebral artery occlusion induced focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Life Sci. Vol. 74, No. 8, (Jan 9 2004):pp. (969-985), 0024-3205 (Print) Toniolo R, Di Narda F, Susmel S, Martelli M, Martelli L & Bontempelli G (2002) Quenching of superoxide ions by curcumin. A mechanistic study in acetonitrile. Ann Chim. Vol. 92, No. 3, (Mar 2002):pp. (281-288), 0003-4592 (Print) Tsao R (2010) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Dietary Polyphenols. Nutrients. Vol. 2, No. 12, 2010):pp. (1231-1246), 2072-6643 Uchida K, Shiraishi M, Naito Y, Torii Y, Nakamura Y & Osawa T (1999) Activation of stress signaling pathways by the end product of lipid peroxidation. 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal is a potential inducer of intracellular peroxide production. J Biol Chem. Vol. 274, No. 4, (Jan 22 1999):pp. (2234-2242), 0021-9258 (Print) Vajragupta O, Boonchoong P, Watanabe H, Tohda M, Kummasud N & Sumanont Y (2003) Manganese complexes of curcumin and its derivatives: evaluation for the radical scavenging ability and neuroprotective activity. Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 35, No. 12, (Dec 15 2003):pp. (1632-1644), 0891-5849 (Print) van Acker SA, de Groot MJ, van den Berg DJ, Tromp MN, Donne-Op den Kelder G, van der Vijgh WJ & Bast A (1996) A quantum chemical explanation of the antioxidant activity of flavonoids. Chem Res Toxicol. Vol. 9, No. 8, (Dec 1996):pp. (1305-1312), 0893-228X (Print) Vlahos CJ, Matter WF, Hui KY & Brown RF (1994) A specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002). J Biol Chem. Vol. 269, No. 7, (Feb 18 1994):pp. (5241-5248), 0021-9258 (Print)


149

Walle T (2011) Bioavailability of resveratrol. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Vol. 1215, No. (Jan 2011):pp. (9-15), 1749-6632 (Electronic) Wang F, Nguyen M, Qin FX & Tong Q (2007) SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction. Aging Cell. Vol. 6, No. 4, (Aug 2007):pp. (505514), 1474-9718 (Print) Wang J, Du XX, Jiang H & Xie JX (2009a) Curcumin attenuates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced cytotoxicity by anti-oxidation and nuclear factor-kappa B modulation in MES23.5 cells. Biochem Pharmacol. Vol. 78, No. 2, (Jul 15 2009a):pp. (178-183), 1873-2968 (Electronic) Wang MS, Boddapati S, Emadi S & Sierks MR (2010) Curcumin reduces alpha-synuclein induced cytotoxicity in Parkinson's disease cell model. BMC Neurosci. Vol. 11, No. 2010):pp. (57), 1471-2202 (Electronic) Wang SL, Li Y, Wen Y, Chen YF, Na LX, Li ST & Sun CH (2009b) Curcumin, a potential inhibitor of up-regulation of TNF-alpha and IL-6 induced by palmitate in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through NF-kappaB and JNK pathway. Biomed Environ Sci. Vol. 22, No. 1, (Feb 2009b):pp. (32-39), 0895-3988 (Print) Wang Y, Xu H, Fu Q, Ma R & Xiang J (2011) Protective effect of resveratrol derived from Polygonum cuspidatum and its liposomal form on nigral cells in Parkinsonian rats. J Neurol Sci. Vol., No. (Mar 2 2011):pp. 1878-5883 (Electronic) Weinreb O, Mandel S, Amit T & Youdim MB (2004) Neurological mechanisms of green tea polyphenols in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. J Nutr Biochem. Vol. 15, No. 9, (Sep 2004):pp. (506-516), 0955-2863 (Print) Wenzel E & Somoza V (2005) Metabolism and bioavailability of trans-resveratrol. Mol Nutr Food Res. Vol. 49, No. 5, (May 2005):pp. (472-481), 1613-4125 (Print) Wild AC, Moinova HR & Mulcahy RT (1999) Regulation of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase subunit gene expression by the transcription factor Nrf2. J Biol Chem. Vol. 274, No. 47, (Nov 19 1999):pp. (33627-33636), 0021-9258 (Print) Williams RJ, Spencer JP & Rice-Evans C (2004) Flavonoids: antioxidants or signalling molecules? Free Radic Biol Med. Vol. 36, No. 7, (Apr 1 2004):pp. (838-849), 0891-5849 (Print) Woo KJ, Lim JH, Suh SI, Kwon YK, Shin SW, Kim SC, Choi YH, Park JW & Kwon TK (2006) Differential inhibitory effects of baicalein and baicalin on LPS-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression through inhibition of C/EBPbeta DNA-binding activity. Immunobiology. Vol. 211, No. 5, 2006):pp. (359-368), 0171-2985 (Print) Xu Y, Ku B, Cui L, Li X, Barish PA, Foster TC & Ogle WO (2007) Curcumin reverses impaired hippocampal neurogenesis and increases serotonin receptor 1A mRNA and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in chronically stressed rats. Brain Res. Vol. 1162, No. (Aug 8 2007):pp. (9-18), 0006-8993 (Print) Xu YX, Pindolia KR, Janakiraman N, Chapman RA & Gautam SC (1997) Curcumin inhibits IL1 alpha and TNF-alpha induction of AP-1 and NF-kB DNA-binding activity in bone marrow stromal cells. Hematopathol Mol Hematol. Vol. 11, No. 1, 1997):pp. (4962), 1082-8893 (Print) Yamamoto H, Schoonjans K & Auwerx J (2007) Sirtuin Functions in Health and Disease. Mol Endocrinol. Vol. 21, No. 8, (August 1, 2007 2007):pp. (1745-1755), Yang F, Lim GP, Begum AN, Ubeda OJ, Simmons MR, Ambegaokar SS, Chen PP, Kayed R, Glabe CG, Frautschy SA & Cole GM (2005) Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid

150


beta oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo. J Biol Chem. Vol. 280, No. 7, (Feb 18 2005):pp. (5892-5901), 0021-9258 (Print) Ye SF, Hou ZQ, Zhong LM & Zhang QQ (2007) Effect of curcumin on the induction of glutathione S-transferases and NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase and its possible mechanism of action. Yao Xue Xue Bao. Vol. 42, No. 4, (Apr 2007):pp. (376-380), 0513-4870 (Print) Yoritaka A, Hattori N, Uchida K, Tanaka M, Stadtman ER & Mizuno Y (1996) Immunohistochemical detection of 4-hydroxynonenal protein adducts in Parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 93, No. 7, (Apr 2 1996):pp. (2696-2701), 00278424 (Print) Yu S, Zheng W, Xin N, Chi ZH, Wang NQ, Nie YX, Feng WY & Wang ZY (2010) Curcumin prevents dopaminergic neuronal death through inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. Rejuvenation Res. Vol. 13, No. 1, (Feb 2010):pp. (55-64), 1557-8577 (Electronic) Zbarsky V, Datla KP, Parkar S, Rai DK, Aruoma OI & Dexter DT (2005) Neuroprotective properties of the natural phenolic antioxidants curcumin and naringenin but not quercetin and fisetin in a 6-OHDA model of Parkinson's disease. Free Radic Res. Vol. 39, No. 10, (Oct 2005):pp. (1119-1125), 1071-5762 (Print) Zhang F, Shi JS, Zhou H, Wilson B, Hong JS & Gao HM (2010) Resveratrol protects dopamine neurons against lipopolysaccharide-induced neurotoxicity through its anti-inflammatory actions. Mol Pharmacol. Vol. 78, No. 3, (Sep 1 2010):pp. (466-477), 1521-0111 (Electronic) Zhang L, Chen J & Fu H (1999) Suppression of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1-induced cell death by 14-3-3 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 96, No. 15, (Jul 20 1999):pp. (8511-8515), 0027-8424 (Print) Zhu YG, Chen XC, Chen ZZ, Zeng YQ, Shi GB, Su YH & Peng X (2004) Curcumin protects mitochondria from oxidative damage and attenuates apoptosis in cortical neurons. Acta Pharmacol Sin. Vol. 25, No. 12, (Dec 2004):pp. (1606-1612), 1671-4083 (Print) Zhuang H, Kim YS, Koehler RC & Dore S (2003) Potential mechanism by which resveratrol, a red wine constituent, protects neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Vol. 993, No. (May 2003):pp. (276-286; discussion 287-278), 0077-8923 (Print)

8 Inhibition of Tau Phosphorylation as a Potential Strategy in Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease Wang Wenya

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University China 1. Introduction At present, Parkinson’s disease (PD) has become the third most common neuropathy following cerebrovascular diseases and epilepsy, and is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease (AD). There is growing evidence that neuronal apoptosis plays a key role in the mechanism in PD, AD and other neurodegenerative diseases [Mattson, 2000; Yuan & Yankner, 2000]. Therefore, regulating neuronal apoptosis signaling pathway will provide a theoretical basis to reveal the mechanism of neuronal apoptosis; and on the basis of research, development of antineuronal apoptosis drugs to selectively interfere with critical target of apoptosis signaling pathway would be an important means in prevention of neurodegenerative diseases effectively. Although subject to intensive research, the etiology of PD is still enigmatic, which in turn has hindered the development of effective treatment. Today, PD treatment is basically symptomatic, and no neuroprotective therapies are available. The current therapy for PD mainly aims at replacing the lost neurotransmitters. The signs and symptoms of PD can be alleviated with drugs that enhance dopamine function, among which, levodopa is considered the most effective one. The most severe shortcoming of levodopa treatment is that it fails to alter the progression of PD. Patients with advanced PD may develop a variety of motor complications associated with levodopa therapy, such as switching phenomena and dyskinesia [Rylander et al., 2010]. More disappointing is the therapeutic effect of levodopa weakens after about two years (Marsden & Parkes, 1977). Therefore, there is still an urgent need of finding more beneficial treatment strategy for the disease. Here, we proposed a neuroprotective drugs to effectively control the course of PD: it can inhibit substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons from "primary" progressive loss, so as to achieve the purpose of effective treatment of Parkinson’s Disease.

2. Inhibition of tau phosphorylation as a potential strategy in treating PD Dopamine neurons have a strong ability of physiological compensation before the disease is clinically evident. Generally, the disease become clinically evident (decompensated state) when the dopamine neuron loss is sufficiently severe (greater than 75% of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons) [Lloyd, 1977]. It is well known that programmed cell death (apoptosis) plays a key role in the neurodegenerative processes in PD [Büeler, 2010; Nagatsu & Sawada,

152


2007]. Several intraneuronal pathways are implicated in N-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) -induced neuronal apoptosis [Chung et al., 2010; Ethell & Fei, 2009; Karunakaran et al., 2008; Saporito et al., 2010]. These include c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) signaling, p53 activation, cell cycle re-activation, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3)/Tau signaling pathway, signaling through bcl-2 family proteins and so on. The neurotoxin MPTP is converted in the brain into 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium iodide [MPP (+)] by the enzyme monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B). MPP (+) is a selective inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I and is widely used in rodent and cell models to elicit neurochemical alterations associated with PD. We had found 10μmol/L MPP (+) activated JNK, phosphorylated c-Jun and induced neuronal apoptosis. It decreased the number of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunopositive cells and reduced cytoplasmic volume. SP600125 [Bennet et al., 2001], the specific inhibitor of JNK protected dopaminergic neurons and increased the number of TH immunopositive cells via inhibiting c-Jun phosphorylation. These results indicated that SP600125 inhibited the activation of JNK and therefore protected dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons from apoptosis induced by MPP(+), which suggested that JNK might be a new target of influencing neuronal apoptosis [Wang et al., 2004]. Therefore, we had first proposed a new strategy for PD treatment, which is using a specific inhibitor of JNK. Of course, there are a great number of “targets” to interfere with nigral dopaminergic neuronal apoptosis, such as GSK-3β, also named as Tau protein kinase I (TPK I). 2.1 The tau protein Tau is a low molecular weight component of cytoskeletal structures. It is one of several types of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) which regulate the assembly and stability of microtubule networks. Although microtubule networks exist in all kinds of animal and plant cells, the mRNAs encoding tau proteins are expressed predominantly in neurons, where these tau proteins are localized mostly to axons [Higuchi et al., 2002]. They are abundant in neurons in the central nervous system and are less common elsewhere. This unique feature suggests that Tau may have neuron-specific functions. In a healthy person, tau protein interacts with a compound called tubulin to strengthen the neural tubes in the axons of neurons. The neural tubes essentially act like train tracks for signals to pass along the axon. Disruption in the level of tau protein can lead to instability in the neural tubes, which makes it difficult for neurons to pass signals along [Kowall & Kosik, 1987]. When tau proteins are defective, and no longer stabilize microtubules properly, they can result in dementias, such as Alzheimer's disease [Sergeant et al., 2008]. 2.2 Normal functions of tau phosphorylation Protein phosphorylation is widely used to regulate cellular processes, because it can affect binding between two proteins. Phosphorylation is a process that adds a phosphate group to a protein, particularly on the amino acid serine, threonine or tyrosine. For the Tau protein, its association with microtubules is inhibited if certain residues in its microtubule binding domain are phosphorylated [Gendron & Petrucelli, 2009]. The phosphorylation of tau plays a physiological role in regulating the affinity of tau for microtubules. Though less well studied, phosphorylation also regulates the binding of tau to signaling molecules and could thus influence tau-mediated signaling [Reynolds et al., 2008]. The kinases that phosphorylate tau can be divided into two major groups, according to motif specificity: proline-directed protein kinases (PDPK) and non-proline-directed protein kinases (non-

Inhibition of Tau Phosphorylation as a Potential Strategy in Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease

153

PDPK). The PDPK include cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and several stress-activated protein kinases. GSK3-β is often described as a PDPK but the proline is not always required for phosphorylation by GSK3-β.The phosphorylation of tau by these kinases inhibits the ability of tau to promote microtubule assembly and facilitates the polymerization of tau into paired helical filaments (PHFs) [Evans et al., 2000]. Among the non-PDPK are cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), calcium- and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), and microtubule affinity regulating kinase (MARK). Unbound tau may then be hyperphosphorylated by other kinases. In fact, the phosphorylation of tau by MARK may be a prerequisite for the action of downstream kinases, including GSK-3β and Cdk5 [Nishimura et al., 2004]. Recently, Tau has received great attention because mounting evidence has indicated that hyperphosphorylation of Tau is the origin of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In an AD brain, too many residues in the Tau protein are phosphorylated [Buerger et al., 2006; Schönknecht et al., 2003 ] 2.3 Phosphorylation of tau in PD Hyperphosphorylation and accumulation of Tau in neurons and glial cells result in PHFs and is one of the main pathologic hallmarks in many neurodegenerative disorders such as AD and other Tauopathies [Sato et al., 2006]. Phospho-Tau (Ser396) has been found in synaptic-enriched fractions in AD frontal cortex at entorhinal/transentorhinal, limbic and neocortical stages [Muntané et al., 2008]. GSK-3β- immunoprecipitated sarcosyl-insoluble fractions from AD patients can phosphorylate recombinant Tau [Ferrer et al., 2005]. Densitometric studies show between 20% and 40% phospho-Tau (Ser396) in synaptic-enriched fractions of the frontal cortex in PD [Muntané et al., 2008]. Moreover, Tau- immunoreactive Lewy bodies (LBs) are detected in the medulla of 80% of individuals with sporadic PD or dementia with LBs, where Tau is often localized at the periphery of LBs [Ishizawa et al., 2003]. We also found MPP (+)/MPTP induced abnormal phosphorylation of Tau at Ser396 in nigra in PD models. To investigate whether Tau is phosphorylated in MPTP-treated dopaminergic neurons, we examined the histochemical localization of Tau (Ser396) phosphorylation level in SNc following treatment with MPTP. TH immunofluorescence was used to detect DA neurons. Three months old adult male C57 black mice were given MPTP at a dose of 30mg/kg ip. once daily for 7 days. SNc slices were prepared 6 h after the third MPTP injection, and double-labeled with antibodies against TH and phospho-Tau (Ser396). We found that in MPTP-treated mice, nearly all TH positive cells exhibited the increased levels in phopsphoTau, whereas no loss of TH positive cells was observed. Furthermore, many TH negative cells were stained with phopspho-Tau, but the levels were unchanged between MPTP-treated and untreated mice [Wang et al., 2007]. Cell counting results showed that in MPTP-treated group the percentage of phopspho-Tau stained neurons in TH positive cells was increased to 98%, while the control was just 37%. These results suggest that after MPTP treatment, Tau is selectively phosphorylated in dopaminergic neurons. Similarly, Qureshi HY found that exposure of human neuroblastoma M17 cells to MPTP enhances intracellular alpha-synuclein protein level, stimulates Tau protein phosphorylation at Ser262 and induces apoptosis [Qureshi & Paudel, 2010]. 2.4 Preventing tau phosphorylation rescued neurons A cdk5 inhibitory peptide (CIP) selectively inhibited p25/Cdk5 activity and suppressed the aberrant Tau phosphorylation and reduced apoptosis in cortical neurons [Zheng et al.,

154


2005]. In SH-SY5Y-cotransfected cells expressing α-Syn and human dopamine transporter (hDAT), both LiCl and TDZD-8 blocked GSK-3β activation in a dose-dependent manner, with concomitant decreases in hyperphosphorylation of Tau and cell death [Duka & Sidhu, 2006; Duka et al., 2009]. A GSK-3beta specific inhibitor, L803-mt, attenuated Tau phosphorylation and rescued DA neurons from cell death in mesencephalic cultures [Chung et al., 2010]. We had reported that AR-A014418, a specific inhibitor of GSK-3β, reduced the levels of phospho-Tau (Ser396), protected nigral neurons from apoptosis, and restored the depletion of dopamine evoked by MPTP in C57BL/6N mice [Wang et al.,2007]. 2.5 Two anticancer drugs dephosphorylated tau and rescued dopaminergic neurons 2.5.1 Chromomycin A3 protected cultured dopaminergic neurons from apoptosis induced by MPP(+) Chromomycin A3 (Fig.1.) is a glycosidic antibiotic produced at the fermentation of a strainof Streptomyces griseus. It is also called toyomycin or aburamycin. It is not only an antibacterial antibiotic, but also an antitumor antibiotic that inhibits RNA synthesis, especially in solid tumors. Chromomycin belongs to the DNA-interactive Drugs. The compound blocks macromolecule synthesis by a specific, reversible interaction with DNA in the presence of bivalent metal ions. Binding to DNA minor groove mediates an efficient competitive inhibition of DNA gyrase and significantly affects topoisomerase II activity [Hou et al., 2008].

Fig. 1. Chemical structure of Chromomycin A3 [from sigmaaldrich] Chromomycin A3 has also been shown to be a potent inhibitor of neuronal apoptosis induced by glutathione depletion-induced oxidative stress and DNA-damaging agent Camptothecin [Chatterjee et al., 2001]. Mechanistic studies suggest that chromomycin A3 antagonizes enhanced DNA binding of the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 to their cognate "G-C" box, induced by oxidative stress or DNA damage [Chatterjee et al., 2001]. Furthermore, by inhibiting transcription, chromomycin A3 can inhibit protein biosynthesis.


155

Miller identified chromomycin A3 that inhibited NF-kappaB signaling in a NF-kappaB mediated beta-lactamase reporter gene assay. It induced caspase 3/7 activity and had an inhibitory effect on cervical cancer cell growth [Miller et al., 2010]. We know that oxidative stress and elevation of intracellular calcium levels are particularly important inducers of NFkappaB activation. Activation of NF-kappaB can interrupt apoptotic biochemical cascades at relatively early steps, before mitochondrial dysfunction and oxyradical production. The available data identify NF-kappaB as an important regulator of evolutionarily conserved biochemical and molecular cascades designed to prevent cell death and promote neuronal plasticity [Mattson et al., 2000]. Together, these results suggest that chromomycin A3 may be effective agents for the treatment of neurological diseases associated with aberrant activation of apoptosis and highlight the potential use of sequence-selective DNA-binding drugs as neurological therapeutics. Last year, we reported that chromomycin A3 inhibited Tau phosphorylation at Ser396 and therefore protected dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons from apoptosis induced by MPP (+) [Wang et al., 2010]. 2.5.2 Mithramycin prevented MPP(+)-induced cultured neuronal apoptosis Chromomycin A3 and mithramycin (also known as MIT and plicamycin) are two DNA binding anticancer antibiotics, acting via inhibition of replication and transcription during macromolecular biosynthesis. The clinical use of chromomycin A3 is limited because of its immuno suppressive properties and greater cytotoxic effects. But mithramycin is one of the older chemotherapy drugs, which has been in use for decades. Mithramycin (Fig.2.) selectively binds to G-C-rich DNA in the presence of Mg (2+) or Zn (2+), inhibiting RNA and DNA polymerase action [Majee & Chakrabarti, 1999]. It also inhibits c-myc expression and induces myeloid differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells [Dutcher, 1997]. This drug is prescribed primarily in the treatment of malignant tumors of the testis. It is also prescribed in the treatment of hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria associated with cancer [Rosol & Capen, 1987]. It is given by intravenous route only. It was discontinued as of 2000 by the manufacturer based on decreased demand.

Fig. 2. Chemical structure of mithramycin [from sigmaaldrich]

156


Renewed interest in mithramycin resulted in about 50 mithramycin related publications in the first half of 2010 alone. Most publications mentioned anti-cancer abilities of the compound, but other medical conditions were also referred, such as: Huntington's disease (HD) neurodegeneration [BirZeit P.A, on line]. Recent research shows that it is helpful in treating motor symptoms and prolonging life in a mouse model of HD [Ferrante et al., 2004].

Fig. 3. Mithramycin inhibited MPP (+)–induced apoptosis in cultured dopaminergic neurons. Dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons were obtained from 14-day-old fetal rats. At DIV5, 10 μM MPP(+) was used to induce neuronal apoptosis for 48h. Specific TH-antibody was used to detect dopaminergic neurons. (a) control, Fluorescent micrograph by fluorescence microscope showing TH positive cells visualized with FITS (green); (b) 10μM MPP(+) decreased TH positive cells and reduced cytoplasmic volume; (c) 0.2μM mithramycin, and (d) 0.5μM mithramycin rescued TH positive cells. Scale bar = 50μm. Pharmacological treatment of a transgenic mouse model of HD (R6/2) with mithramycin extended survival by 29.1%, greater than any single agent reported to date. Increased survival was accompanied by improved motor performance and markedly delayed neuropathological sequelae. Voisin screened candidate therapeutic compounds that were identified previously in cell culture/animal studies in a C. elegans HD model and found that two FDA approved drugs, lithium chloride and mithramycin, independently and in combination suppressed HD neurotoxicity [Voisine et al., 2007]. Because it is Food and Drug Administration-approved, researchers thought mithramycin is a promising drug for the


157

treatment of HD. Since mithramycin has enhanced neuronal survival and neuroprotection, it may protect dopaminergic neurons. We also use cultured dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons with MPP (+) as PD cell model.

Fig. 4. TUNEL figures of inhibitory effect of mithramycin on dopaminergic neuronal apoptosis induced by MPP (+). Dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons were obtained from 14-day-old fetal rats. At DIV5, 10 μM MPP(+) was used to induce neuronal apoptosis for 48h. Specific TH-antibody was used to detect dopaminergic neurons. (a) Positive control. Strong TUNEL labeling showed apoptotic bodies in all kinds of cells; (b) control, vehicletreated Neurons;(c) 10 μM MPP (+) induced neurons apoptosis (green) and decreased TH immunopositive cells (red). White arrow showed apoptotic dopaminergic neurons (yellow). (d) Fewer TUNEL-positive cells were shown with 1.0 μM mithramycin treatment. Scale bar = 50μm.

158


The embryos were removed at embryonic day 14 from pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats that had been anesthetized, then decerebrated. Ventral mesencephalon were dissected and collected. Cell suspensions prepared by mechanical trituration precoated overnight with 1 mg/ml polyethylenimine in borate buffer, pH 8.3. The cells were then maintained for maturation and differentiation in DMEM/F12 culture medium. Cultures were treated at DIV1 and every three days 250 µL of culture medium were replaced by medium supplemented with treatments. At DIV5, 250 µL of 500 µL medium were replaced by fresh medium supplemented or not with mithramycin at 200, 500, 1000 nM and 10 µM of MPP (+) were added. After 48 h, cells were fixed for 15 min with a 4% formaldehyde solution, washed three times with 500 µL PBS then submitted to TH immunostaining to allow analysis of DA neurons. Undoubtedly, MPP (+) induced apoptosis in cultured dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons. It decreased the number of TH positive cells and reduced cytoplasmic volume. 200, 500 and 1000 nM mithramycin rescued TH immunopositive cells from cytotoxic MPP (+) (Fig.3.). To detect DNA fragmentation, we used TUNEL. TUNEL is one of the main methods for detecting apoptotic programmed cell death. We found 1.0 μM mithramycin reduced MPP (+)-caused TUNEL-positive cells (Fig.4.) Mithramycin not only increased the number of TH immunopositive cells, but also showed protective action in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1). Interesting, mithramycin also decreased the levels of phosphorylated Tau (Fig.5).

Mithramycin (μmol/L)

Neuronal Survival ( % control)

0

32.8 ± 2.7

0.2

42.8 ± 5.2 *

0.5

57.1 ± 6.3 **

1.0

65.9 ± 7.3 **

2.0

76.3 ± 8.7 **

5.0

87.3 ± 8.4 **

* P

Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Complementary and Integrative Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease

Restorative Therapies in Parkinson's Disease

TOWARDS A NEW MANIFESTO?

Towards a New Architecture

A New Model for Health and Disease

Self Therapies for Common Diseases

This New Disease

This New Disease

Towards a New Literary Humanism

Towards a New Russia Policy

Scientific Basis for Ayurvedic Therapies

Aging: Modern Theories and Therapies (New Biology)

Existential Therapies

Expressive Therapies

New Research on Alzheimer's Disease

IT Success!: Towards a New Model for Information Technology

Towards a New Architect: The guide for architecture students

Celiac Disease For Dummies

Celiac Disease For Dummies

Pharmacogenomics: The Search for Individualized Therapies

Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Epilepsy

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies for Trauma 2nd Edition

Stretching Therapy: For Sport and Manual Therapies

Parkinson's Disease For Dummies

Brain Stimulation Therapies for the Clinician

Towards a New Epistemology of Mathematics

Anatomical Imaging: Towards a New Morphology

Towards a New Science of Health

Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism

Recent Advances in Parkinsons Disease, Volume 183: Part I: Basic Research (Progress in Brain Research)

Towards New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Complementary and Integrative Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease

Restorative Therapies in Parkinson's Disease

TOWARDS A NEW MANIFESTO?

Towards a New Architecture

A New Model for Health and Disease

Self Therapies for Common Diseases

This New Disease

This New Disease

Towards a New Literary Humanism

Towards a New Russia Policy

Scientific Basis for Ayurvedic Therapies

Aging: Modern Theories and Therapies (New Biology)

Existential Therapies

Expressive Therapies

New Research on Alzheimer's Disease

IT Success!: Towards a New Model for Information Technology

Towards a New Architect: The guide for architecture students

Celiac Disease For Dummies

Celiac Disease For Dummies

Pharmacogenomics: The Search for Individualized Therapies

Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Epilepsy

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies for Trauma 2nd Edition

Stretching Therapy: For Sport and Manual Therapies

Parkinson's Disease For Dummies

Brain Stimulation Therapies for the Clinician

Towards a New Epistemology of Mathematics

Anatomical Imaging: Towards a New Morphology

Towards a New Science of Health

Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism

Recent Advances in Parkinsons Disease, Volume 183: Part I: Basic Research (Progress in Brain Research)

Recommend Documents