The Slav: Move by Move

Cyrus Lakdawala the Slav move by EVERYMAN CHESS www . everym a nchess com . move First published in 2011 by Glo...

Author: Cyrus Lakdawala

1708 downloads 6353 Views 43MB Size Report

This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form

DOWNLOAD PDF

Cyrus Lakdawala

the Slav move

by

EVERYMAN CHESS www

.

everym a nchess com .

move

First published in 2011 by Gloucester Publish ers plc (formerly Everyman Publish ers plc ) , Northburgh House, 10 Northburgh Street, London EC1V OAT Copyright© 2011 Cyrus Lakdawala The right of Cyrus Lakdawala to be identified as the author of this work h as been asserted in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. N o part of thi s publication m ay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, m agnetic tape, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permis sion of the publish er. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. I S B N : 978 1 8 5 744 678 4 Distributed in North America by The Globe Pequot Press, P.O Box 480, 246 Goose Lane, Guilford, CT 06437-0480. All other sales enquiries should be directed to Everym an Chess, Northburgh House, 10 Northburgh Street, London EC1V OAT tel : 020 7 2 5 3 7887 fax: 020 7490 3 708 em ail : info@everym anchess.com; website: www.everymanchess.com Everyman is the registered trade m ark of Random House Inc. and is used in this work under licence from Random House Inc.

Everyman Chess Series

Chief advisor: Byron Jacobs Commi ssioning editor: John Emms Assistant editor: Rich ard Palliser Typeset and edited by First Rank Publishing, Brighton. Cover design by Horatio Monteverde. Printed and bound in the US by Versa Press.

C ontents

Series Foreword

5

Bibliography

7

Introduction

9

17

1

The Mainline Dutch Variation

2

6 lLle s

111

3

6 lLlh4

1 66

4

The Geller Gambit

196

5

Fifth Move Alternatives

225

6

4 e3 Lines and 3 lLlc3 dxc4

248

7

Fourth Move Alternatives

306

8

The Exchange Sl av

34 0

9

Slav Versus Reti and King's Indian Attack

377

Index of Variations

40 7

Index of Games

413

4

Series Foreword Move by Move is a series of opening books which uses a question-and-answer form at. One of our m ain aims of the series is to replicate - as much as possible - lessons between chess teachers and students. All the way through, readers will be challenged to answer searching questions and complete exercises, to test their skills in chess openings and indeed in other key aspects of the game. It's our firm belief that practising your skills like this is an excellent way to study chess openings, and also to study chess in general . Many thanks go to all those who h ave been kind enough to offer inspiration, advice and assistance in the creation of Move by Move. We're really excited by this series and hope that readers will share our enthusiasm .

John Emms Everym an Chess

5

6

Bibliography Books

Caro-Kann Defence: Panov Attack, Anatoly Karpov and Mikh ail Podgaets (Batsford 2006) Chess Explained: The Main-Line Slav, David Vigorito (Gambit 2009) Dealing with d4 Deviations, John Cox (Everym an Chess 2005) English: Franco, Slav and Flank Defences, John Watson (Batsford 1981) Gambits in the Slav, J eremy Silman and John Donaldson (Chess Enterprises 1993) Grandmaster Repertoire: 1 d4 {Volume One), Bori s Avrukh (Quality Chess 2009) My Great Predecessors Part/, Garry Kasparov (Everym an Chess 2003) Play 1 d4!, Rich ard Palliser (Batsford 2003) Semi-Slav Defense: Non-Meran Variations, John Donaldson and Jeremy Silman (Summit 1988) Slav Defence: Meran Variation, Rini Kuijf (New in Chess 1992) Starting Out: Slav and Semi-Slav, Glenn Flear (Everyman Chess 200 5) Starting Out: The Colle, Rich ard Palliser (Everyman Chess 2007) The ... a6 Slav, Glenn Flear (Everym an Chess 2003) The Chebanenko Slav According to Bologan, Victor Bologan (New in Chess 2008) The Complete Semi-Slav, Peter Wells (Holt 1994) The Exchange Variation of the Slav, Jeremy Silman and John Donaldson (Chess Enterprises 1994) The Gambit Guide to the Torre Attack, Graham Burgess (Gambit 1999) The Meran System, Steffen Pedersen (Gambit 2000) The Semi-Slav, Matthew Sadler (Chess Press 1998) The Slav for the Tournament Player, Glenn Flear (Batsford 1988) The Slav versus 1 d4, Jeremy Silman and John Donaldson (Chess Enterprises 1996) The Slav, Graham Burgess (G ambit 2001) The Slav, Matthew Sadler (Chess Press 1997) Electronic/Online

ChessBase 10 Chess Today (with annotations from Alexander Baburin and Mikhail Golubev) Chesspub.com Chesslive database Th e Week in Chess

7

8

Introduction

'

The Slav has been around for a long time. For your viewing pleasure, here it is in all its glory! 1 d4 d5 2 C4 c6

World Champion Dr. Max Euwe elevated it to the world stage when he defended the Black side against Alekhine in their World Championship matches of 1935 and 1937. To day, the Slav is considered the most solid and most pedigreed option against queen's pawn openings, and is championed by 9 out of the 10 top players in the world. (We stockholders of Slavcorp Industries Incorporated still wait to see if Radjabov will get on board, but so far it's been a no-go from this one holdout GM who continues to resist our attempts at a hos tile takeover and insists on playing the King's Indian.) From beginningless time to about the 1930s, virtually everyone responded to 1 d4 with l...ds and the Queen's Gambit Declined with 2 c4 e6. The emergence of the Slav provided Black with a path which escaped some of the troubles that plagued QGD players: 1. In the QGD Black shuts in his light-squared bishop. With the Slav Black plays 2...c6, and Black's bishop is free to roam, usually to fS but sometimes to g4 or even b7 and a6 in some of the gambit lines. 2. When White plays i.gs in the QGD he pins the f6-knight. In the Slav we have yet to play ...e6, so there is no pin with i.gs. In fact i.gs often turns out to be an illogical move for White, since Black may respond with ...l2Je4 or in some cases ...'ii'as.

9

The S la v: M o ve by M o ve 3. With the Slav we don't immediately allow White a structural imbalance. In the QGD Tarrasch Black gets handed an isolani, and in the Exchange QGD White gets the minority attack on the queenside. Enough shop talk. I don't need to sell you on the Slav, perhaps the most popular chess opening in the world.

The Format of the Book The book is designed to mimic a chess lesson with a question and answer format. Some of the questions are authentic, from my students. Keep in mind that students range from 11002400, so some are basic; others rather sophisticated. We work in an interactive format and the reader is expected to put in some effort. The book contains various exercises featuring planning, calculation, multiple choice quizzes, combination alerts, critical decisions and yes, even homework assignments. This is an opening book designed for club-level players and the emphasis remains just that. But the focus isn't exclusively there, and we also touch on mid dlegame and endgame training. I want you to get better at chess, not just the Slav!

An Early Slav Game Let's begin the book by looking at one of the earliest Slav encounters:

Game1

World

J.Zukertort-W.Steinitz

Champion shi p (Ga me 1), USA 1886

1 d4 d 5 2 c4 c6 One normally associates the Slav in World Championship games with Euwe and Kram nik. Well now you know: the Slav has been around for a while. 3 e3 i.fs

10

In t roductio n Steinitz follows Matthew Sadler's suggestion from his 1997 book on the Slav. I wonder if he had access to a time machine.

I admit I am a little hurt that Steinitz followed Sadler's

line and not mine from this book. I recommend the lines 3...luf6 4 tt:Jc3 a6, and 3...tt:Jf6 4 lZ:Jf3 .ifs (see Chapter 6).

4 lZ:Jc3 e6 5 lZ:Jf3 lZ:Jd7 6 a 3 Alternatively: a) 6 'i¥b3 'iWb6 7 cs fic7 8 lZ:Jh4 .ig4 9 h3 .ihs 10 g4 .ie7! 11 tt:Jfs exfs 12 gxhs tt:Jgf6 13 i.e2 lZ:Je4 and White's bishop pair doesn't make up for the damage to his structure, E.Meduna-K.Rasmussen, Manila Olympiad 1992. b) 6 i.d3 i.g6 7 e4 dxe4 8 i.xe4 .ixe4 9 tt:Jxe4 tt:Jgf6 10 tt:Jxf6+ 'it'xf6 11 0-0 i.d6 12 b3 0-

o 13 i.b2 as and the

exchange of a pair of pieces gives Black equality, V.Kosyrev-A.Dreev,

Moscow 2003.

6 ... i.d6

1

cs?!

Question: This move looks quite strong. Why did you give it a dubious mark? Answer: 7 cs?! is the kind of move which is played all the time at club level. Some of my

students are fearful of this plan by White no matter how much I tell them it's harmless. My reassurances go unheeded and are akin to lecturing the wind on the virtues of keeping still. In reality, Black should welcome an unprovoked cs. His ds-pawn is no longer under pressure which means he can hit back with ... es soon. The move is also a poor choice from Zukertort's perspective: Zukertort, a lion when at tacking, held his own against Steinitz in open games. Tragically, Steinitz made him look like a pre-schooler in closed positions. Surely Zukertort must have been aware of this fact. So then why block the position with his last move?

7 ... i.c7 8 b4 e s 9 .ie2 tt:Jgf6 10 i. b2 He blows his last chance to keep the position somewhat open with 10 dxes!.

11

Th e Sla v: M o ve b y M o ve

10 ... e4 Too late now. The caravan runs from b7 to e4. Black may already stand better since his chances on the kingside outweigh White's queenside attack.

11 lLld2 h s 12 h3 lLlfst The knight seeks action on the kingside.

13 a4 lLlg6 14 b5 Rybka, which is closed-game challenged much like Zukertort, recommends the moronic 14 as?. After 14...a6! White just shuts down all his counterplay on the queenside while Black is boss on the kingside. Even if White castles queenside, which he should, Black makes headway on the kingside due to his massive space advantage.

14 ltJh4 15 g3?1 ..•

Taking the bait. In 1886, a retreat like 15 i.fl! violated chivalric law, but it was White's best move. He shouldn't weaken further.

Exercise (multiple choice}: What course should Black take? The options are:

a) 1 S ltJg6. Back off, the knight has achieved its aim, creating weaknesses. b) 1 S . lLlf3+. Sac a pawn to open the e4-square. c) 1S . lLlg2+. The knight goes on a suicide mission, intending to sac on e3. ...

..

..

Answer:

15 ... lLlg2+1

Black's knight plunges into the suicide mission to whip up an attack for its comrades.

16 'it>f1 lLlxe3+ 17 fxe3 i.xg3 For the piece Black gets: 1. Two pawns; 2. A perpetually exposed white king; and 3. A potential pawn avalanche on the kingside. Conclusion: The sac is sound and White's position becomes very difficult to navigate.

12

In t roduct i o n

18 'it>g21i..c7 1 9 'ii'g1? White plans a five kilometre fun-run to the queenside with his king but picks the wrong way to go about it. 19 ltJfl! preparing 'it>f2, 'it>e1 and 'it>d2 was his best plan.

Exercise: Find a method of halting White's plan.

Answer: 19 ....Uh61

Now ....l:tg6 is a very strong idea. 20 'ittf1 20 <Jtf2?? is even worse: 20....Ug6 21 'ifb1 Ji..g3+ 22 'it>f1 'ii'd7 23 Ji..d1 Ji..xh3+ 24 'it>e2 i.g4+ and White gets crushed. 20 :g6 21 'ii'f2 �d7 22 bxc6 •..

22 h4?? i.h3+ 23 <Jte1 i.g3 drops the queen.

13

Th e Sla v: M o ve b y M o ve 22... bxc6 23 .l:tg1 i.xh3+ Picking up a third pawn for the piece. White doesn't have an iota of counterplay. 24 'i¥te1lbg4 25 i.xg4 i.xg4 26liJe2 'ike7 27lbf4? 27 'iio>d1 was better. White's king should put on his Air Jordan running shoes and take off fast for the queenside. 27 ....l:th6?! Wasting a tempo. 27....l:t.f6! 28 'Wh4 i.xf4 29 exf4 e3! 30 liJf1 I:tb8 31 i.c3 'ife4 threatens mate with ...l:tbl+, or better yet, ...'fihl+!. 28 i.c3 28liJb3 .l:.f6 29 'ikl14 i.xf4 30 exf4 'ifb7 31 Itg3l::Ixf4 is also hopeless for White. 28 ...gs 29liJe2 �f6 30 'ikg2 :lf3! Making inroads into White's position. 31liJf1.l:lb8 32 'iii>d2?

Exercise: Black has a way of reducing White to total paralysis. How?

32...fs This plan is okay, but not Black's best. Kasparov, in his monumental series My Great Predecessors, claimed the old lions were ginormous patzers in comparison to today's top players. He intimated that a current master-strength player might be able to take down a world championship contender if transported back a couple hundred years. Of course such comparisons can't be made, and a player's strength should be judged for his own time. It's not out of the realm of possibility that if we transported Morphy in his prime to our time, gave him a database and books spanning the last

so

years (don't give him My System or

Morphy may plateau at a 1599 rating! ), and gave him access to a good psychiatrist, he could be kicking Topalov's, Anand's, Carlsen's, and yes, Kasparov's collected butts within a few years! And if not that, then at least playing competitively within the group.

14

In t roductio n Answer: 32...�h3! is the move. After 33 'in11 g4 34 lL'lh2 .Uf2 35 tt:'Jfl �f6 36 .Ue1 h4 37

'it>dl 'iif3 38 Wd2 l:tb3 White is in zugzwang with nearly all his pieces remaining! 33 as I'm afraid the queenside attack isn't destined to go very far. 33...f4

A pawn roller like this, a routine plan for us, was a very strange notion in 1886. Most players considered pawns a nuisance which got in the way of their piece activity. Here we see Steinitz using his pawns as attacking weapons. Once again his time machine pays divi dends and Steinitz proves to be ahead of his time. 34 �h1 "i¥f7 Steinitz, like everyone, had his flaws

U udging

from photographs, I'm pretty sure he

didn't own a razor) but closed games was not one of them. With python-like play, he kept squeezing White and threatened to take on e3 followed by ....Uf2. 35 .:.e1 fxe3+ 36 tt:'Jxe3 Itf2

15

Th e Sla v: M o ve b y M o ve ...'iif3 follows. The game is over. 37 'ilfxf2!? I said "The game is over!" I assure you this isn't going to help. 37 'ii'xf2 38l2Jxg4 i.f4+ 39 'it>c2 hxg4 40 i.d2 e3 41 i.c1 'ii'g2 42 '>t>c3 'it>d71 •••

Practising what he preached: "The king is a fighting piece- use it!" and heading for fS! 43 �h7+ 'it>e6 44l:th6+ 'it>fs 45 .txe3!? This brave attempt at a combination doesn't cut it. 4S

•••

.txe3 46llf1+ i.f4 0-1

S u m m a ry I f paired with Steinitz it would b e best if you didn't block the position.

Acknowledgments Many thanks as always to John Emms, for allowing me to run around the park without a leash in every chapter. Thanks to Nancy for proof reading without rolling her eyes too many times, and for generously offering so many sips of her coffee. Thanks to Timothy for being such a staunch ally against my computer, which I suspect is sentient and determined to delete all my work. And thanks also to you, the reader, for having the genius to avoid all the other openings against 1 d4 and choosing the Slav! May your Slav wall always remain intact against the battering rams of the enemy forces! Cyrus Lakdawala, San Diego, May 2011

16

Chapter One

The Mainline Dutch Variation

1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3 l'Llf3 l'Llf6 4 l'Llc3 dxc4 5 a4 i.fs 6 e3 e6 7 ..txc4 i.b4 8 o-o

Let's get our toughest challenge out of the way first. Take a good long look at the start ing position of the Dutch Variation of the Slav. It may be our biggest threat of the many lines White throws at you. Some of Black's potential problems include: 1. White commands more central influence and may soon push his e-pawn forward gaining even more space. Black must be vigilant about both es and ds pushes later on. 2. The extra space automatically hands White attacking chances... Castling queenside doesn't get you off the hook either due to the c-file. 3. In many cases White picks up the bishop pair with a well timed l'Llh4. I realize that what I have just described doesn't sweeten the deal much for Black! Relax, the Slav isn't a forced loss. Black has the following potential:

17

Th e S l a v: M o ve b y M o ve 1. Black occupies a hole on b4. Later it may be possible to lock it down completely with ...as and transfer a knight to b4. Don't underestimate control over b4. Black often wins Slav endings solely on the basis of just this one hole in White's position. 2. Black's position is a fortress - not so easy to pierce. White must break down several defensive barriers to even begin making a dent. 3. The third advantage for Black is mostly psychological. White usually believes himself to be in charge in such positions and often carries dreams of expansion (ala Napoleon) of his space advantage. Often, the harsh reality for White is that he overreaches and pushes his pawns too far. Then Black simply occupies the holes and weak squares left behind. Let's begin this chapter with one of the most famous Slav games of recent years. This also gives us an opportunity to go through the early moves leading to the position after 8 0-0.

Gamel

World

V.Topalov-V.Kramnik

C hampionship (Game 2), Elista 2006

1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 The pure Slav move order. Most Semi-Slav players avoid this move order and choose 2...e6 instead to avoid the annoying Exchange Slav which we deal with in Chapter 8. 3 lt:Jc3

Question: Why can't Black just win a pawn now by capturing on c4? Answer: You can actually take the pawn right away with 3...dxc4!? but don't expect to hang

on to it! We examine this idea in some detail in Chapter 6. 3 lt:Jf3 lt:Jf6 4 lt:Jc3 is the other move order to reach the game position.

18

Th e M ainlin e D u tch Va ria tio n 3 . ..lt:lf6 4l2Jf3 Later we examine 4 e3 a6!?, which leads to the e3 variation of the Chebanenko Slav.

Question: What if White pl ays 4 i.g 5? Answer: .tgs isn't such a good move. First of all, �xf6 exf6 only assists Black to free his

game and grab the bishop pair. If this is the case then what is the point of playing the bishop to g5? Watch the way Dutch prodigy Anish Giri handled it as Black: 4...dxc4 5 a4 'iia 5! 6 lLlf3 l2Je4! 7 .td2 l2Jxd2 8 l2Jxd2 e5! 9 l2Jxc4 �4 10 lLlxes (10 e3 i.e6 is also nice for Black) 10...'i!Vxb2 11lic1 .ltb4 12 'ikd2 'it'xd2+ 13 'it>xd2, P.Hopman-A.Giri, Hilversum 2009. I already prefer Black, for the following reasons: 1. He owns the bishop pair in the queenless middlegame; 2. He opened the position, favouring the bishops; and 3. White's king may not be all that safe. True, queens are off the board but there are still many black pieces out there and the white king may soon face a black rook down the d-file. 4...dxc4

This may be Black's best time to take on c4.

Question: Why do we have to enter complications like this? What is wrong with the solid 4 i.fs? ...

�----------

Answer: It pains me to have to criticize this London-style move but it just leads to trouble

after 5 cxd5! cxd5 6 'ifh3!. Now Black has real problems defending b7 and dS. Let's look: a) 6...b6 7 i.gs e6 8 e4! dxe4 9 .tbS+ We7, S.Pinchuk-D.Danchenko, Nikea 2002, couldn't have been fun for Black! Instead, after 9...l2Jbd7 10 l2Je5 i..e7 11 .txf6 Black drops a piece. b) 6...'itb6 7 l2Jxd5 l2Jxd5 8 'iix d5 e6 9 'i!Vb3 l2Jc6 10 .td2 'ii'xb3 11 axb3 l2Jb4 12 l:.a4! , P.Haba-S.Movsesian, Litomysl 1994. White hangs on to an extra pawn in the ending and retains all the winning chances.

19

Th e Sla v: M o ve b y M o ve c) 6....ic8

Question: Didn't Black just give away two tempi? Answer: He sure did. This is the only way to avoid material loss or slaughter! After 7 .if4 e6

8 e3 .id6 9 .ibs+ lZ::lc6 10 lZ::les .i.xes 11 .i.xes .i.d7 12 .ixc6! .ixc6 13 'ii'a3 'ii'e7 14 .id6 the balance of power between White's dominant bishop and its sickly Black counterpart be came obvious in G.Kasparov-D.Hausrath, Dusseldorf (simul) 1988.

Question: let's return to Black's 4th move. What is wrong with 4 ..e6? .

Answer: Nothing. 4...e6 leads to Semi-Slav lines which we don't cover in this book. Here, we

purists only cover the real Slav. 5 a4 Otherwise Black gets to hang on to his extra pawn by playing ...bs. We examine the mean-spirited Geller Gambit 5 e4!? bS in Chapter 4. s ....ifs 6 e3 We cover 6lZ::les next chapter, and 6lZ::lh4 in Chapter 3. 6...e6 7 .ixc4 .ib4 Black logically occupies the hole on b4 and keeps White worried about ....ixc3 in case White decides to push his e-pawn forward. 8 0-0 We've reached the "starting position" of the main line. let's buckle up our seat belts and deal with possibly our biggest challenge/headache in the entire book. 8 ...lZ::l bd7 Black can also castle here, and we look at that line later in this chapter. With 8...lZ::lbd7, Black keeps the option of castling queenside.

20

Th e M a i n l i n e D u tch Va ria t i o n

9 'ii'e2 White prepares e4. Later in this chapter we examine lines withlL:lh4 and �3. One very important point to note with the 8...lDbd7 move order is that White has a draw if he wants one with 9 'Wb3: a) 9...as (only move) 10lDa2 i..e7 11 'ikxb7l:b8 12 �a6 (12 �xc6?? J:!b6! traps the queen and would be a nice present if one of your opponents did this) 12....l:!a8 13 'ii'xc6 l:c8 14 'ii'hs .Ub8 draws by an eternal game of tag between queen and rook. b)

I played 9...�6? against my good friend, Professor and IM David Strauss. Unfortu

nately, he stabbed me in the back with a deadly prepared novelty for the game: 10 e4 i..g6 11 i.xe6!! fxe6 12 aS! Si.xas 13 �xe6+ 'ittd8 14 eslL:le4 1SlDxe4 il.xe4 16 'i!Vf7!! .

This huge novelty was discovered b y m y friend, David Gliksman, who passed i t onto Strauss for this game against me. (Note to self: remember to de-friend David Gliksman and David Strauss from my Facebook page!) 17 �f7!! refutes 9...�6, which was the main book move at the time! White clears the

21

Th e S l a v: M o ve b y M o ve way for his e-pawn. Believe it or not, Black is defenceless against this idea. And now the innocent lamb is led to the slaughterhouse: 16 ... .Uf8 17 'i!Vxg7 ..ids 18 e6! i.xe6 19 'ti'gS+! (the nightmarish point of 12 as! is revealed: my bishop on aS is en prise due to the double attack) 19 ... 'oii>c8 20 �xas and I was toast, D.Strauss-C. Lakdawala, Southern California State Championship, Anaheim 1992. You can avoid all this horror by sidestepping 9 ... '1Wb6?. Also, remember if you want to avoid this drawing line as Black you must play the 8 ... 0-0 move order rather than 8 ... 4Jbd7. Returning to 9 't!Ve2:

We have reached one of the most important positions in the Slav, and also one critical to its survival.

Question: Can Black mess up White's plan of playing e4 by occupying the square with 9 ltJe4? ...

Answer: No, the knight is just an uninvited visitor on e4 which is not a stable square for

the horse: 10 ttJa2! i.d6 11 4Jd2 'ii'c7 12 g3

o-o 13 4Jxe4 i.xe4 14 lbc3

(the knight returns

triumphantly to take back lost territory: e4) 14 ... ..ig6 1S f4! (locking down on es before Black manages to play the freeing move himself) 1S ... h6 16 e4. White recaptured control over e4 and got a few free kicks on Black's pieces in the process. 9 ..ig6 ...

Black often plays 9 ... 0-0 10 e4 ..ig6, transposing. 10 e4

22

Th e M ainlin e D u tch Va ria tio n

10...0-0

Question: Did Kramnik miss the win of a pawn with 10

...

i.xc3

11

bxc3 ltJxe4?

Answer: In chess we rarely get something for nothing. Kramnik saw he could take the

pawn but doesn't want it because White gets a huge attack for it. For example, 12 i.a3 'i'c7 (12... ltJxc3? 13 'ii'h2 ttJds 14 �xb7 is suicide for Black) 13 ltJd2! ltJdf6 (White is willing to give up a second pawn in order to open lines with 13...ltJxc3 14 'i�Ve3 ttJds 15 i.xds cxds 16 llfc1) 14 tt:Jxe4 ltJxe4 15 .l:tfe1

o-o-o

16 'iVh2 l:f.he8 17 f3 ltJd6 18 i.fl Wb8 19 as tt:lc8 20

i.cs f6 21 l:ta4! es 22 l:tea1l1d7 23 :b4 and White aimed his guns directly at Black's king, G. Kasparov-E.Bareev, Tilburg 1991. You can actually play this way with Black if you have great confidence in your defensive abilities, but I warn you, if you choose to do so you are asking for it.

23

Th e Slav: M ove b y M ove It is a lot easier to play White in such positions and most club-level players know exactly what to do when you castle into their open b-files. 11 i.d3

Question: Why is White bothering to cover his e-pawn?

Shouldn't he just get on with it and go forward with

11

e5?

Answer: He can do this, but Black gets good counterplay after 11...lt:Jd5 (see Game 5).

11 -ths •••

Question: This is the third time the bishop moved. Why is Black doing this? Answer: It is worth the time loss because the bishop puts White in an irritating pin, and

it is White who may lose time trying to unravel from it. 12 es Chess is a kind of barter system where one must often give up something in order to get something else. Here Topalov hands over the d5-square to Black to seize more central space which increases his attacking prospects on the kingside. 12...tt:Jds

13 tt:Jxds Sealing d5 with a black pawn instead of a piece. 13 tt:Je4 gets the knight to a good square in exchange for Black taking control over d5. I think this is a good bargain for Black: 13...i.e7! (remember this manoeuvre, which clears b4 for a knight) 14 ti:Jg3 i.g6 15 i.xg6 hxg6 16 lt:Je4 cs. Black looks all right after this freeing move. White still enjoys a space advantage with his e5-pawn outpost but Black's powerful knight on ds compensates. 13...cxd5 14 'it'e3! An instructive multi-purpose move. White unravels from the pin and prepares tt:Jgs!.

24

Th e M ainlin e D u tch Va ria tio n 14....tg6 1sll:lgs! Scary stuff. White threatens to trade bishops on g6, followed by 'ii'h3. 1S ....l:!.e8! Clearing f8 for the knight, which can then defend h7 without creating weaknesses. Black avoids various traps here: a) 1S ...h6?? 16ll:lxe6!. b) 1S ....txd3? 16 'ii'xd3 g6 17 'ii'h3 hS 18 g4 .te7 19 'ili'h4 'it>g7 20 gxhs l:t.h8 21 h6+! (this trick ruins things for Black) 21...h1! Oops! Maybe I was a bit hasty to say Black's king was safe! White plans to launch a big attack with l:tg1 and g4, and his queenside be damned! 19 rl.c8 20 g4! •••

Exercise: Let's say Black kicks the knight with g4 when White retreats. Come up with

an

20

h6 intending to take on

...

attacking plan for White.

Answer: 20...h6? blows up on Black big time because Topalov had no intention of re

treating and planned 21 lbxe6! lbxe6 22 gxfslDf8 23 .l:.g1. White's rolling pawns and open g-file give him a vicious attack for the piece. 20 'ili'd7 21 l:g1 i.e7 22lbf3! ...

White needs the knight in the attack and keeps pieces on the board. 22 .l:lc4 •••

Attacking a4. 23l:tg2!

26

Th e M ainlin e D u tch Va ria tio n

Question: You said "attacking a4" but Topalov

didn't bother to protect it. Why didn't he? Answer: Don't believe everything I tell you! After Topalov's pawn sac he gets a huge at

tack. The trouble is, White has burned all bridges and has essentially abandoned his queenside. If his attack fails on the kingside White has little chance in an ending. Topalov could have played it safe with 23 b3 :!c6. Now White has two attacking paths: a) 24 1:tg2l::!.ec8 25 ..i.d2 fxg4 26 .l:lxg4 'iie8! 27 l:tag1 g6 28 h4 'iif7 intending .. .'ii'f5 with a complicated position where it isn't clear whose weak wing will fold first. b) White can try 24 gxf5?! exf5 251:tg2 .I:f.ec8 26 ..i.d2 but Black holds after 26 ...l:.g6!. 23...fxg41 Black must exercise patience. The pawn was poisoned: 23... .l:lxa4? 24 .l:txa4 'ii'xa4 2 5 gxf5 exf5 2 6 'iixf5 'iid l+ 27 tt:Jg1 ..i.d8 2 8 'ii'h3! .l:.e7 2 9 f5 gives White a decisive attack. 24l:txg4l:lxa4 25 .l:tag1 g6

27

Th e Sla v: M o ve by M o ve

Exercise: Could White sac twice on g6 and draw by perpetual check

with 26 :xg6+ hxg6 27 :xg6+? Answer: No, the sac fails. Black accepts the first sac but declines the second with

27.. .h8 31.:.g8+ Wxh7

32 l:t1g7+ Wh6 33 fS+ ..tgs 34l'hgS! 'ii'f1+ 35 lLlg1 .:e2 36 11Sg6+ and mate next move. If you were able to work this out on your own, then you are a very strong player and should perhaps be thinking about going after your IM and GM norms!

28

Th e M a i n l i n e D u tch Va ria t i o n 30 g7!

The parade of endless tricks and surprises go on unabated. White continues to leave both queen and rook en prise. 30... hxg4

Black can 't touch the queen : 30 ... l'l.xc2?? 3 1 gxf8'ii'+ Wxf8 3 2 .Ug 8+ Wf7 3 3 l hg 7 m ate. 31 gxf81i'+ .ixf8? So far Topalov has thrown every possible obstacle at Kramnik. Finally, Kramnik buckles under the force of the hurricane and blunders. He misses a defence based on a couple of problem-like interference moves. He should play 3 1...Wxf8 ! : a) 3 2 1i'h 71i'e2 3 3 1i'h 8+ Wf7 34 'ii'h s+ Wf8 3 5 1i'xg4. N ow Black saves him self with the remarkable 3 S ... .ig S ! ! when he gets the reprieve he needs to survive the onslaught. b) 32 1i'g 6 .ih4! ! 33 tt:\xh4 (if 33 1i'xg4 We7 34 1i'xh4+ Wd7 and Black h olds things to gether) 33 ...1i'e2 ! 34 tt:\g 21i'f3 and White h as nothing better than to take the perpetual . let's return to 3 1.. . .ixf8:

29

Th e Sla v: M o ve b y M o ve

Exercise: The game is

on

the line. Find the path to

White's well deserved victory.

32 'i¥g6+? The unimaginable strain of a World Championship match does strange things to great players. Remember when Fischer grabbed Spassky's h-pawn and voluntarily entombed his bishop in the first game of their Reykjavik match? I was a dorky 12-year-old at the time and even I knew Fischer's move was dumb! Topalov at this stage reminds me of a young cat who has a street-smart mouse cor nered but doesn't know what to do next to finish the job! Answer: 32 llxg4+! wins easily after 32 ... i..g7 (forced) 33 'i!!Vc7! 'i!!Vf l+ 34 lt.Jg1 and Black

must give up a full queen to avoid mate. 32. .i..g7 33 fs! l:i.e7! .

Question: It looks crazy to walk into a fork on f6. Why not play 33 . exfs? ..

Answer: Black gets bludgeoned after 34 tt.Jgs! 'i'd7 35 1i'h7+ 'iti>f8 36 l:tf1!.

34 f6 "i!Ye2! 35 'il'xg4 1If7

36 .l:.c1? Topa falters a second time. White still wins after 36 'it'hs! as (36...'i'xe3?? 37 tt.Jgs wins on the spot) 37 l:tg3! '1Wxe3 38 fxg7 l:.b1+ 39 �h2 l:.b2+ 40 'it>h3 l:txg7 41 lt.Jgs!. For example, 41...'i'f4 42 �e8+ �f8 43 'iixf8+ �xf8 44 lt.Jxe6+ �f7 45 lt.Jxg7 a4 46 tt.Jfs .l:lb3 47 lt.Jd6+ �e6 48l:lxb3! axb3 49 lt.Jbs b2 so lt.JC3. Just in time! Black's passers are halted and the protected passer on es wins for White. 36...�c2 Naturally Kramnik denies the rook entry into his camp.

30

The M ainline D u tch Va ria tio n 3 7 .l:.xc2 'ifdl+?! GM Bareev thinks 37...'iVxc2! is more accurate. Let's see if he is right: 38 ttJgs 'ii'h1+ 39 'it>g2 'i¥c2+ and now: a} 40 'iit>h3 'ifd3 41 'iVf3 i.f8 42 tbxe6 .l:.h7+ 43 'iit>g3. I played out several scenarios from this point with Captain Rybka at the helm, and amazingly they always worked out to a draw. b) 40 i.f2!? 'ii'g6! 41 �h3 ..th6 42 tbxe6 'ii'xg4+ 43 'iit>xg4 as. It's almost impossible to correctly evaluate this position without playing out the next 20 moves or so, but I prefer White's chances on the kingside with those deeply entrenched passers over Black's queen side passers. 38 'it>g2 'ii'xc2+ 39 �g3

Exercise: White's attack looks formidable despite the reduction in material. What is your defensive plan?

3 9 .'ife4?! ..

Answer: If Black gets queens off the board, White's attacking chances go up in smoke

and those two connected queenside passers will be very difficult for White to halt. How ever, Kramnik picks the wrong spot to swap. Stronger was 39...'iVfS!, as pointed out by GM Bareev, which turns the game into a crap shoot and total chaos after 40 Vi'xfs exfs 41 ttJgs llc?. I am praying you don't ask me for an assessment here because I don't have a clue as to who is winning or losing! 40 i.f4?! White mistimes the queen trade. It was better to do it now with 40 �xe4! dxe4, as after

41 ttJgs .l:.d7 42 fxg7! (42 tbxe6!? led to drawn games with the computer playing itself} 42 ...l'Z.xg7 43 'iit>f4 .l:.e7 44 'iit>xe4 as 4S dS exdS+ 46 �xds White has real chances to win:

1. Black's pawns are probably halted by the busload of white pieces.

31

Th e Sl a v: M o ve by M o ve

2. The d-pawn m ay eventually cost Black his rook. 3. I'm pretty sure Topalov knows how to deliver mate with bishop, knight and king again st lone kin g ! 40.. .'ii'f51

I insist!

Question: Can White avoid a queen trade?

41 'ii'xfs

White must submit to the swap. If he dodges the trade with 41 'ir'h4? his attack fails miserably after 41 ... i.xf6 ! 42 exf6 l:txf6 43 ttJe s as ! 44 i.e3 a4 45 tbg4 l:l.g 6 46 'ii' d8+ 'i!Vf8. Those two connected passers carry the day for Black. White can 't go on a pawn grabbing adventure on the queenside since thi s would allow Black's queen and rook to gun down White's king on the other wing. Answer:

4 1...exfs 4 2 i.gsl

Topalov finds the best practical chance in a bad situation . 42 tLlg s ? should lose to 42 ... .l:k7 43 fxg 7 as 44 i.d2 a4 45 i.b4 a3 ! 46 i.xa3 1k3+ 47 'it>f4 l1xa3 48 e6 'it>xg 7 49 e7 Ita8 50 'it>xfs bS 5 1 tbe6+ Wf7 5 2 tLlc7 :g8 5 3 e8'ii'+ l:!xe8 54 tbxe8 'it>xe8 and Black win s the king and pawn ending . This line is somewhat straightforward so Topa's choice looks better because at least he continues to confuse the situation . 42... asl

Black endured the bullying for a long time. Finally, it's his turn. 43 'it>f4 a4 44 'it>xfs a3 45 i.c1 i.fS 46 e6 l:i.c7 47 i.xa3

White must cough up another piece. 47 e7? loses to 47 ... i.xe7 48 fxe7 l::tx e7 49 i.xa3 J:le3 ! . 47 ...i.xa3

32

Th e M ainlin e D u tc h Va ria tio n

Question:

Black is up a rook in the ending. Why i sn't White resignin g ?

48We51 Answer: Despite Black's m assive m aterial advantage, the position remain s tricky. White wins the dS-pawn and gets three deep, connected passers supported by king and knight. I guarantee that if you or I were Black here, Topa would draw or beat us ! 48 J:tc1 49 lt:lg5 1:tf1 50 e7 Yipes! f7 i s covered and the Black king can't help stop the pawn . ••

50 l:.e1+ 51 xd5 i.xe7 52 fxe7 l:txe7 •••

Question:

Should White resign now? H e i s down a clean exch ange.

_,

__

Answer:

Not yet. White still h as chances in the event Black mish andles the position.

33

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve

Black still has three issues to resolve in the ending: 1. His king is still away from the action . 2. White's king is in the thick of the fight. 3. If White's king and knight gang up and win the b-pawn, the position i s drawn be cause a king and rook can't beat a king and knight on their own. 5 3 �d6 .Ue1 54 d 5 �8 5 5 t'De6+ �e8 56 t'Dc7+ �d8 57 t'De6+ �c8 58 �e7 He threatens to shepherd his passed d-pawn forward to the queening square with d6, d7 and d8 ! .

Exercise:

Come up with the best plan t o put the brakes on White's queening ambitions.

58 .l:Ih11 The threat of a check on h 7 throws White out of sync. 5 8 ... b5? is a fal se path allowing White to escape with a draw after 59 d6 lld1 60 t'Dcs l:te1+ 6 1 t'De6 l:!d1 62 t'Dcs b4 63 d7+ l:txd7+ (63 ... �c7 64 t'Da6+! draws) 64 t'Dxd7 b 3 6 5 t'Db6+! �b7 66 t'Dc4, catching the pawn i n the nick of time. 59 t'Dg5 b51 At last, the shy b-pawn rolls forward. 60 d6 :d1 61 t'De6 b4 62 t'Dc5 l1e1+1 63 �6 l:te3 1 0-1 (see following diagram) What a rook ! : 1 . I t cuts off White's king; 2. The d-pawn has been halted; and 3 . Black's b-pawn is unstoppable since the rook now covers the b3-square. Chapeaus off to both players! This titanic battle is one of my all-time favourite Slav games and an amazing clash of styles.

Answer:

34

•..

Th e M a i n l i n e D u t c h Va ria t i o n

Su m m a ry

When White g ets such attacks in the main line Slav based on es, f4 and g4, Black must drum up adequate counterplay along the c-file and queenside. In this game, Kramnik ini tially got outpl ayed even though his position was inherently defensible. In the end, it was Topa who faltered when he was on the brink of one of the greatest victories of his life. Sometimes it seem s unfair that there isn't a first runner-up prize to the loser of an incredi ble chess game. Game3

M.Ca rlsen-X. Bu

Ca p d'Agde (ra pid) 2008 After Kasparov retired from world domination over the chessboard, I thought there would be a void where no one great player would really stand out. Now th at Carl sen is on the scene, I can see this is not so. It is as if King Kong retires and Godzilla immediately ap plies for the job of terrorizing the masses. 1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 !Df3 !Df6 41Dc3 dxc4 5 a4 .IUS 6 e3 e6 7 .txc4 .tb4 8 o-o o-o 9 'We2 !Dbd7 10 e4 .tg6 11 .td 3 .ths 12 es !Dd s 131Dxd s cxd s 14 'ii'e 3 .te7 The main move in the position, but I don't like it because Bl ack must fork over his im portant dark-squared bishop in this line. I think 14 ... .tg6 ! , as Kramnik pl ayed in the previ ous game, is the most accurate move.

35


1s lLlgs l 1 5 � d 2 a 6 16 l:tfc1 lbb8 ! 17 b 4 �xf3 18 gxf3 ! ? lbc6 19 l:tcb1 'in>6 20 � c 3 .l:tfc8 2 1 bS axbs 2 2 �xb s ? (22 .l:txbs looks level) was played in K. Lerner-M.Sadler, Oberwart 1996, and here Black missed the trick 22 ... lbxe s ! stealing a pawn in broad daylight. lS �xgs Probably too compliant with White's wishes. Giving up the bishop pair so obligingly may be the causal link to Black's future defeat. Black will suffer for a long tim e to come against White's space and bishop pair. ...

Question: What should Black play i nstead?

._________

Answer: Black should m ake White work a lot harder for the bishop pair by choosing 1S ... �g 6 ! , and if 16 �e2 then 16 ... lbb8 ! .

36

Th e M a i n l i n e D u tc h Va ria t i o n

Question: Why retreat a n already developed piece? Answer: The knight retreat to b8 i s standard operating procedure in Slavs where White earlier sealed the ds-square with lt::lx ds. The position is closed, which m ean s quality devel opment overrides quantity development. The knight had few prospects on d7. By playing ...lt::lb 8 ! Black intends to redeploy to c6, where the knight: 1. Pressures the d4-pawn; 2. Eyes the hole on b4; and 3. Has potential for ...lt::l a s, where it m ay head for b 3 or c4. After 16 ...lt::lb 8 the game N .Vitiugov-Zhou Jianchao, Moscow 2009, continued 17 lt::lh 3 lt::l c 6 18lt::lf4 'ifb 6 19lt::lx g6 hxg6 2 0 lld1.

Let's assess: 1. White h as the usual extra space and the bishop pair. 2. White is tied down for now to the defence of d4. 3. White's queenside is in need of defence. 4. Black has an iron grip on the b4-square, plus b3 and C4 are potential outposts for his forces. s. Black has a powerful bishop covering several key dark squares. Many of his pawns are well placed on the opposite colour of his remaining bishop. Conclusion : The position is probably dynamically balanced, and whenever I say "dy namically balanced" this is code for: "I prefer Black ! " It was Tal who once observed that if Black equalizes, then he stands better simply from the psychological boost he gain s ! 16 'Wxgs i.. g 6 17 i.. e 2 Principle: When you own the bishop pair avoid swapping one of them. 17 lt::l b 8!? Black doesn't fully escape the pressure if he keeps queens on the board: 17 ... 'ifb6 18 'We3 llfc8 19 h4 h 6 20 hS i.. e 4 2 1 lla3 :tc2 2 2 as 'Wc7 2 3 .l:.a2 lt::lb 8? (23 ... 'Wd8 ! provides an exit for the rook) 24 i.. d 2 lt::lc 6 2 5 i.. c 3 and White will soon win the exch ange due to the ...

37


over-eagerness of Black's rook on c2, H .Grooten-M.Al Modiahki, Gibraltar 2007. 18 'ii'x d8 :xd8 19 a s ! The pawns o n e s and now a s , like the tentacles of an octopus, wrap tightly around Black's position and seize territory. 19 tt:Jc6 20 i.e3 a6 He could h ave m ade White's task more difficult with the line 20 ... tt:Jb4! 2 1 l:tfc1 .:tdc8 22 l:tC3 tt:Jc2 2 3 .l:txc8+ l:txc8 24 .l:tc1 a6. •••

Let's assess the position after the chosen move, 20 ... a6. White's m any advantages include: 1. The bishop pair; 2. Dark-square control ; 3 . Space; 4. The ability to expand on the queens ide; and s . A possible target of b7 via a rook lift to b3. It's not easy for Black to dissolve this weakness by engineering ... b6 because he would be left with a loose knight on c6 and a weak pawn on a6. Conclusion : It's going to be a long, hot afternoon for Black and only misery lies ahead. 21 .l:Ifc1 l':.ac8 22 h4 The immediate 2 2J:k3 looks more accurate. 22 ... tt:Jb4 2 3 .:.c3?1 An inaccuracy which could h ave cost White a h alf point. 2 3 i.g s ! .l:te8 24l:k3 h 6 2 S i.d2 retains the advantage.

38

Th e Mai n l i n e D u tc h Varia t i o n

23 ... h6?!

Bu, at one time the youngest GM in the world (age 1 3 I believe), is a monster calcul ator and tactician . In such difficult defen sive m anoeuvring positions, however, he seems out of his element. Here he misses a golden opportunity with 2 3 . ..lbc2 ! 24l1c1 �xc3 2 5 bxc3 h 6 ! 26 i.d2 lL:la3 27 h S i..h 7 28 f3 l:tc8 2 9 Wf2 lL:lc4 3 0 i.. x c4 llxc4 3 1 l:ta1 i.. c 2 when Black should hold the draw without too much sweat. 24 h5 i.e4 25l:tac1l:tc6? Another plan for Black would be to create a light-squared defen sive wall on the queen side with 2S ... lLlc2 ! 26 i.. d 2 ! I:.xc3 27 i.. x c3 l:!c8 28l1d1lL:la3 ! 29 i..b4lL:lbs 30 i.cs . Although Black's troubles are far from over, this line puts up stiffer resistance than the game con tinuation . 26 f3 i.h7

Exercise: How does White make progress? What's the plan?

______.

39


27 %tb31 Answer: By finding a new target, namely b7. 27 ...%txc1+ 28 �xc1 lt:lc6 Avoidin g Carlsen's devilish trap 28 ... %tc8? 29 �d2 l:te2? 30 l:xb4 l:txd2 31 �xa6 ! which picks off the queens ide pawns due to the back rank m ate threat. 29 lbb7 lt:lxa s He can't afford to give White two connected passers with 29 ... lt:lxd4? 30 �xa6. 30 l:tb6 �c8 31 �d2 lt:lc4 Forcing White into an opposite-coloured bishops ending . 3 2 �xc4 dxc4 3 3 l:txa6 l:t b 8 34 �c3

Question: Shouldn't Black hold? White is only one pawn up in an opposite-coloured bishops ending and he doesn't even have a passed pawn . Also, White's bishop stands passive on c3 .

...._____

Answer: All true, but the reality i s the situation is grim for Black for these reasons: 1. White will eventually turn his five-to-four king side pawn majority into a passer. 2. Black's bishop is a problem piece. It sits on h 7 like an uninvited relative. If it manoeu vres to b3, it is al so out of play there. If it goes to d3, Black is vulnerable to this trick: White brings his king to e3 and then plays b4! creating a passer due to Black's hanging bishop on d3. 3 . White's king m ay move unimpeded up the board. 4. White pushes his kingside pawns forward, creating a potential endgame attack by exposing Black's king. Conclusion : In this case, the principle stating that opposite-coloured bishops favour the pawn- (or pawns-) down side i s overridden by the other principle: Opposite-coloured bish ops favour the attacker. I remember an interview of Carlsen's where he surprisingly said that Kasparov still cal-

40


culates better than he does but Carlsen claimed t o assess positions better than Kasparov! Maybe he is right. If you asked the m ajority of players to assess thi s position, my guess is that most would say the logical result of the game should be a draw. Carlsen was capable of seeing through the veil and realized that this just wasn't so. 3 4 i.d3 35 'iW2 .Ub7 36 g4 �h7 37 �e3 g6? This impatient move weakens his dark squares beyond repair. Black should just wait and do nothing. •.•

Exercise: Come up with

-----

a winning plan for White.

38 d S I I A brilliant decision. The extra pawn is not a s important a s dark-squared control. With his last move, Carlsen unleashes the attacking potential of his buried bishop and opens up d4 in case his king cares for a stroll up the middle. 38 exd 5 39 l:ta8! Mates on h 8 begin to loom over Black's head. 39 J1e7 40 'iW4!? Missing or rejecting the creation of a passer with the trick 40 b4! f6 41 �d4!, when White's b-pawn, supported by the king, m arches forward with deadly effect. 40 gxh5 41 gxh s .:te6 42 l:td8 Regaining his pawn advantage. 42 i.c2 43 l:txd 5 .ia4 44 .:.cs

Answer:

.••

•.

•.•

•.•

41


44 .. Jla6 Question: Why didn't Black defend his c-pawn ? Answer: If 44 ... i.b3, Black falls into hopeless passivity after 45 litc7 �g 8 46 :K.c8+ �h 7 47 �e3 ! . The threat of f4-f5 eventually forces Black's bishop away from defensive duties on b3. 45 :K.c71 According to Rybka, this is even stronger than 45 :K.xc4. 4S i.e8 46 �g4 Black is in a straightjacket and helpless to prevent the forward march of the f-pawn. 46 ... l:tc6 47 !:.a7 l:tc8 48 f4 �g8 49 fs :K.d8 so e6 1itc8 51 f61 •••

Exercise (multiple choice}: H ow does White win after 5 1 .. .fxe6? The choices are: a) 52 :g7+; b) 5 2 �4; c) 52 i.d2

42


Answer: White wins with the tricky 5 2 l:tg 7+! �h 8 5 3 .l:tc7 ! which puts the big hurt on Black. The prosaic 53 f7 is also good enough . 51 ... l:tb8 52 e7

It's over. White's rook m ay be coming to d8 soon . The remainder is like one of those movies where you can easily guess the ending even before the movie finishes. 5 2 ...'it>h7 53 'iW4 .:.cs 54 .:.a1 i.b5 5 5 .:.g1 1-o 55 .:tg 1 i.e8 5 6 l:td1 ! is curtains for Bl ack. S u m m a ry

This game illustrates some of the dangers facing Bl ack. If his position sours, White pushes him around with extra space and a bishop pair while Black continues to langui sh san s counterplay. Game 4

V.Anand-V.Kra m n i k

World C h a m pion s h i p (Ga me 7), Bon n 2008 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 lt:\f3 lt:\f6 4 lt:\c3 dxc4 5 a4 i.f5 6 e3 e6 7 ..ixc4 i.b4 8 o-o lt:\bd7 9 'ii'e 2 i.g6 10 e4 o-o 11 i.d3 i.h5 12 e5 White can al so postpone the e5 advance. A couple of option s: a) 12 ..if4 inhibits the freeing break ... e s (see Game 7). b) 12 l:td1 e5! 1 3 i.e3 'ii'e 7 14 h 3 exd4 1 5 i.xd4 .l:tfe8 16 l:te1 i.xf3 ! 17 'ii'xf3 lt:\e5 18 'ii'g 3 l:tad8 19 i.xe 5 lt:\h 5 ! 2 0 'ii'f3 'ii'x e5 and Black already stands slightly better due t o h i s iron grip on the dark squares, R.Kempinski-A.Wojtkiewicz, Warsaw 199 5. 12 ...lt:\d 5 13 lt:\xd 5 cxd 5 14 'ii'e 3 This is the point where Kramnik played 14 ... i.g6 against Topalov (see Game 2). Here he tries something different: 43


14 ... :es 15 tt:Je1!? 1 5 tt:Jg s .tg6 16 f4 .txd3 17 'ii'x d3 fs tran sposes to Topalov-Kramnik.

Question: Why would Anand retreat an already developed piece? Answer: Several reasons: 1. tDe1 clears the path for a king side pawn storm beginning with f4. 2. The knight may be redeployed to c2, where it not only attacks Black's good bishop, but also fights for b4 and covers White's weak d4-pawn . 3 . If Black plays ... .tg6, as he does in the game, and swaps on d3, White's knight recap tures where it is ideally placed to fight for b4. 15 . . .tg6 Kramnik is the first to deviate. He played 1S .. J:tc8 against Topalov once and got a good position quickly after 16 f4 .txe1 17 .:txe1 .tg6 18 .tf1 .l:.c2 (V.Topalov-V. Kramnik, World Ch. (play-off) Elista 2006). It's a sure bet Anand h ad some improvement cooked up had Kramnik retraced his steps and followed thi s path. .

Question: After 1 S ...llc8, does the Greek gift sac on h 7 work? Answer: I'm not sure. White regains his piece but the assessment of the final position is h ard to evaluate. Let's look: 16 .txh7+!? �xh 7 17 'ii'h 3 g 6 18 g4 l:th 8 ! 19 gxh s �g 8 20 h6 (see following diagra m) and now: 1. White is up the extra doubled h-pawn on h6. 2. White may have attacking chances with the plan �h 1, l:tg 1 tDf3 and then either play on the dark squares or set up a sac on g 6 by first playing tt:Jh4. 3. Black h as the clearly superior pawn structure since White's kingside is in tatters, and his d4-pawn is al so a target. 4. Black controls holes g alore on b4 and fs.

44


s. Black may b e able t o regain h i s l ost pawn by . . .i.f8 at some point. 6. Black owns the c-file and infiltrates there later. 7. White's queenside pawns are weak and may be easily picked off later by a pawn grabbing black queen or rook. Conclusion : I personally prefer Black but an attacker m ay be licking his chops and would probably go for White. So essentially, the assessment depends upon your style of play. I would think that we Slav guys would take Black though.

16 i.xg6 hxg6 Question: Is there any m erit in capturing away from the centre with 16 ...fxg6 ? Answer: It's another tough call. The benefit o f capturing away from the centre i s that the open f-file keeps Black's king safer. The downside is that l ater the e6-pawn could be-

45


come a target for White's pieces, especially in an ending. It definitely looks like an idea though, and I believe it is fully playable here. 17 lt:Jd3 'ii b 6?

Exercise: Should White trade knight for bishop, or should he keep his knight on the board for his attack?

18 lt:Jxb41! Answer: Exchanging knight for bishop is a brilliant strategic decision . Question: But h asn't White just backed himself into a bad bishop versus good knight situation ? Answer: It appears that way, but it's a mirage. This position is an exception to the rule and White's bishop later dominates Black's knight despite the fact that White's centre pawns are fixed on the dark squares d4 and e s . In hindsight 17 . . .'it'b6 was an uncharacteristically poor strategic decision by the high priest of positional play. Kramnik refused to back down with 17 ... i.f8, but that would have been the correct choice. 18 'iix b4 19 b3! l:tac8 20 i.a3 'iic 3 After 20 ... 'it'b6 2 1 l:tfcl .Uc6 22 l:txc6 bxc6 2 3 i.d6 ! , Black's weakness on c6 outweighs White's easily defendable weakness on b3. 21 :ac1 'it'xe3 22 fxe3 •••

46


Question: Thi s looks like a classic bad bishop versus good knight situation. What am I missin g ? Answer: I remember watching this game live o n the I C C . The G M commentator - I be lieve Alex Baburin - had at this point come to the realization that White stood better. He tried to convince the kibitzers that the endgame is better for White for these reason s: 1. Formally White's bishop is "bad" (m any of White's pawn s are on dark squares), but in reality it's a fine piece as it roam s a good diagonal. 2. Black's knight h as few prospects. 3. One other strange defensive problem Black faces is the prospect of a lost king and pawn ending, should all the pieces come off the board. Question: How would White win the king and pawn ending? White only h as space. It doesn't look like h e can even create a passer or break though with his king. Answer: As a training exercise, let's take a look at a logical scenario where we get into a kin g and pawn ending: 2 2 ... l2Jb8 2 3 i.d6 .l:tc6 24 .Uxc6 l2Jxc6 2 5 b4! .l:tc8 26 �c1 l2Je7 27 l:tcs !

b6 (27 . . J1xcs ? 2 8 dxcs l2Jc6 2 9 bs lZ:Ias 3 0 i.b8 a 6 3 1 c 6 ! creates a deadly passer and wins) 28 l:tc7 .Uxc7 29 i.xc7 f8 30 i.d6 e8 31 i.xe7 xe7.

47


Okay, here we are: 3 2 h4 f6 3 3 'itn2 a6 34 bs as 3 S 'i.tn3 <Jif7 3 6 <Jif4 (White's goal is to create a puncture for king entry through Black's kingside pawn wall) 3 6 ... <Jie7 3 7 e4! dxe4 (on 37 ... <Jif7 there follows 38 exf6 gxf6 39 es fs 40 <Jig s <Jig 7 41 g 3 and zugzwan g ! ) 38 <Jixe4 <Jid7 39 dS <Jie7 40 exf6+ gxf6 41 dxe6 <Jixe6 42 g4 <Jid6 43 h S ! and finally White wins due to his outside passed pawn . Returning to the position after 2 2 fxe 3 : 22. . .f6 23 ..id6 g5 24 h 3 <Jif7 2 5 <Jif2 <Jig6 26 <Jie2 fxes 27 dxes

Question: Surely White's doubled e S-pawn is weak and a target, isn't it? Answer: e s i s secure for the following reasons: 1. Black can n ever play ...l:.f8 intending .. J:tfs because White's bishop i s trained on f8. 2. Black's king can't move to fs either, because White's rook covers the f-file, and if Black man ages to lure White's rook away from the file, White still has g 2-g4 impri soning Black's

48

Th e M a i n li n e D u tc h Va ria t i o n

king and cutting o ff access t o the fs-square. 27 ... b6 28 b4! A multipurpose m ove: 1. It cuts off cs for Black's knight. 2. It creates a potential for bs which would fix Black's pawn s on b6 and a7, juicy targets for White's bishop later in the game. The bS advance would also create a possibility for l:i.c6 ! which would m ake serious inroads in Black's camp. 28 .. J�c4! Question: Thi s looks pretty risky, almost desperate. Are such radical measures necessary for Black's survival ? Answer: Let's see if passive defence works: 28 .. J:th 8 29 'it>d3 l:the8 30 e4 dxe4+ 3 1 'it>xe4 l:i.h8 32 l:tfd1 l:th4+ 33 g4! llhh 8 (if 33 ... l:txc1 34 l:txc1 l:txh 3 35 l:.c7 ltJb8 36 b s l:th 8, now the nonchalant 3 7 l:txa7 wins for White) 34 b S ! 'it>f7 3 5 .l:t.c6 ! and White either doubles rooks to infiltrate or creates a deadly passed pawn on c6. Conclusion : Black's position is on the brink of collapse and Kramnik's 28 ...I:tc4! is his only ray of hope for survival . 29 l:i.xc4 dxc4

Exercise (multiple choice}: Which is White's best move? a) 30 aS; b) 30 �d2; c) 30 l:.c1

30 llc1?! I'm afraid Anand botched the exercise! I have noticed a strang e pattern throughout my career which I call The Leader Syn drome. It occurs when I lead a m atch or a tournament and become prone to over-caution. Just recently at the G ambito rapid tournament I play in every week, I beat a 2 264, then a 49


2 2 5 1, followed by a win against a 2 1 50. I led the tournament by a full point going into the fourth and final round. I got paired with a 1994 player, with the White pieces, and only drew the game (with great difficulty!) due to my predictably overcautious play. In Anand's case, it was easy to blow the win because in the back of his mind he could play it safe due to his lead in the m atch . Safety took precedence and he played less ener getically than he should h ave. Watch how in the next few moves Anand falls prey to this chess disease and avoids the strongest line. Answer: 30 d2 ! is the correct choice. After 30 .. Jic8 3 1 c3 a6 3 2 bS axb s 33 axbs ttJcs 34 xc4, White has excellent chances of converting his advantage. Reducing pawns with 30 as?! bxas 3 1 bxas l:.c8 only helps Black. 30 ... llc8 31 g4 a s ! Excellent defence. Black needs access t o c s for h i s knight o r rook in the future. 3 2 bs c3! 3 3 ltc2 'OW7 34 d3 ttJcs+l A nice save. Kramnik forces a pawn-down, drawn king and pawn ending. 3 5 i.xcs Itxcs 36 �xc3 :xc3+ Yz-Yz

After the recapture 3 7 xc3 I am sorry to report that my norm ally stable friend Rybka freaks out and falsely claims a winning advantage for White! A quick examination shows that White's king h as no entry into Black's position and there is no win . S u m m a ry

You can try 14...lte8! ? just as long as you like Black's position after a possible bishop sac on h7. Game s

A.David-A.Grisch u k

French League

2003

1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lLlf3 lLlf6 4 lLlc3 dxc4 5 a4 i.fs 6 e3 e6 7 i.xc4 i.b4 8 o-o lLlbd7 9 'ii'e 2 50


g 0-0 ...

As mentioned previously, Black can al so reach this position by castling on m ove 8. Question: Why not pin with 9 ...i.g4? ---

Answer: Pinning is an option. This is the type of position I normally go for as Black, rather than the normal ... i.g6, and we look at a few of my games with thi s idea at the end of the chapter. The benefit of ... .tg6 is that it continues to put pressure on White's centre, whereas pinning with ... .tg4 may provoke h3 and g4. You can look at ... .tg4 in two contrasting ways: 1. We tempt White into overextending; or 2. We just gave White two tempi for his attack! Probably ... .tg6 i s the more solid move and it is the choice of strong GMs. But m aybe it's like one of those inkblot tests psychiatrists show their patients. People see what they want to see in any given m ove. After 9 ... .tg4, the game can go 10 l:td1 o-o 11 e4 'i'as 12 es tl:lds 13 tl:le4 and you can decide whether you prefer the bishop on g6 or where it stands on g4. 10 e4 i.g6 11 es White deviates from the m ain m ove, 11 .td3. 11 tl:ld s •••

51


12 .id2 Question: Is 12 lbe4 a better move for White? Answer: 12 lbe4 i s playable but probably not better than the move chosen in the game. A logical path is 12 ... .ie7 ! (freeing b4 for a knight in the future, although 12 ... cs is also pos sible) 13 litd1 h6 14 as bs 15 .id3 a6 ! (securing bs in order to hit back in the centre with ... cs) 16 lDg 3 c s ! 17 .ixg6 fxg 6 18 dxcs .ixcs, as in L.Yurtaev-J . Hector, Copenhag en 1991.

An assessment: 1. White has an advanced pawn on es, but unlike similar Slav situations, h e doesn't really h ave an attack because Black i s so aggressively posted on the king side. 2. Black has a powerful knight outpost on ds. 3 . Black benefits from an open f-file and possible attacking chances there, or pressure later on against f2 or f4.

52


4 . White's advanced e - and a-pawns m ay turn into endgame targets. Conclusion : I am going to contradict Rybka who claims White has the edge and say Black has the better chances. 12 :i!i'a s Adding pressure to c3 and clearing d8 for a rook. 13 �fc1 ••

Question: How about sealing the hole on dS the way Topalov did in the first game with 1 3 ltlxd5? -------

Answer: White gets less than nothing if he takes thi s route. After 13 ... cxd5 14 i.bs ltlb8 ! 15 l:tfc1 a 6 16 i.d3 i.xd2 17 ltlxd2 ltlc6, Black stands slightly better: 1. White has few chances for a king side attack due to the limited remaining m aterial . 2. Black still has some hope for a win due to White's queenside weakness and hole on b4. 13 : ac8 13 ... �fd8 was a logical alternative. 14 l2Jh4 .•.

Question: White controls m ore space and is g oing to pick up the bishop pair. Shoul d Black be worried?

--------�

Answer: Not yet. Sure, we give White the bishop pair but we also reduce the number of attackers and maybe strengthen our pawn structure around our king. Also, White has plenty to worry about: 1. Holes on ds and b4, controlled by Black; and 2. A backward d4-pawn which could turn into a target later in the game. 14 ttJsb6 15 ttJxg6 hxg6 16 b31? White gets cute and sets a trap for Black. Instead, he should play the more reliable 16 .•.

53


�b3 c s 17 ds ! exds 18 e 6 ! lZ'lf6 19 exf7+ llxf7 20 �c2. White has good play in the form of targets on the kingside. Black can't really hang on to his extra pawn and relies on his roll ing pawn centre in stead. 16 ... es! Black has seen deeper and deliberately "falls into" White's trap. 17 d 5 It is too late t o back down with 17 dxcs ? lbxc4 18 bxc4 lZ'lxc s 19 l:tab1 lZ'lxa4. Black wins a pawn and destroys White's pawn structure to boot. 17 ... exd 5 1S �xd s 18 e 6 ? just drops m aterial to 18 ... dxc4 19 exd7 l:tcd8. 1S ... lbxd 5 19 lZ'lxd s �xd2

Question: It l ooks like White just droppe d a piece. What am I missin g ? 20 b4! Answer: This trick, which creates a short circuit between the queen on as and the bishop on d2, regains the m aterial. 20 ... exb41? Question: Why did Black allow the knight fork? H e looks pretty good in the line 20 .....d8 2 1 ._xd2 lZ'lb6 22 .:l.dl ,.xds 23 •xds lDxds 24 .:1.xds cxb4 2 5 .:tbs . Answer: This is a n interesting psychological mom ent in the game. The l i n e you demon strated leads to a probable draw. Grischuk is playing for the win against his lower-rated G M opponent and is willing to take a calculated risk to do so. 21 lZ'le7+ '>t>h7 22 �xeS �xeS 2 3 lDxeS b3

54


Let's assess: 1. Black will win e S and probably get two pawn s for the exchange, a fair deal . 2. The b-pawn surges forward and if White doesn 't find a way to win it in the next few moves it could spell big trouble for him. 3. White has ideas of lt:\d6 which simultaneously hits b7 and f7. Conclusion : The position looks pretty messy to us humans. H owever, computers see through the fog and Rybka finds a path to a clear advantage for White. 24 .:tb1? The complexity of the position leads White astray and Grischuk's gamble pays off. It's amazing how often a brave, semi-sound move works in chess. Emerson (not the l ead vocal ist with Lake and Palmer, I mean the philosopher!) once wrote: "Once you m ake a decision, the universe conspires to make it happen ! " Rybka claims an advantage for White i n the line 2 4 lt:\d6 ! lt:\xes 2 5 l:tb1 'it'ds 2 6 lt:\e4 .ih6 27 lt:\c3 ! and Black is fighting for the draw since he soon drops his prize b-pawn . 24 .. .'i'c3! Securing the b-pawn . On c3 the queen sits at the top of the food chain with no natural predatory threats. White can 't find a way to win the pesky pawn and soon finds him self in a state of paralysis. 2 5 e6 Hoping to get something going against Black's king. 2 5 ...fxe6 26 'ii'd 1 26 lt:\xa7 b2 27 lt:\b s 'ii'c l+ 28 'i'dl lt:\cs 29 g 3 lt:\xa4 would be similar to the game con tinuation. 26 ... b2 The killer b-pawn reminds me of Al Pacino's line from the movie Sca rface : "Say hello to my little friend!"

55


27 lbxa7 lbc5 28 lDb5 'ii'c 1 Forcing White on the defensive. The simple threat is ...lbxa4 and ... lbc3 . 29 h4 lbxa4 30 'it>h2

Exercise (multiple choice): Which move i s Black's simplest path to victory? a) 30 ... i.f4+; b) 30 ... lDcS ; c) 30 ...'ii'x d1 30 ...lbc5? Missing an opportunity. Answer: The ending is trivial after 30 ... 'ii'x d1 ! 31 l:.xdl i.c1 32 lba3 lbc3 33 l:td7 bs 34 .l:td4 lbds 3 5 lbb1 b4 with ... lbc3 to follow. 31 h5 g5 3 2 lba3 'Wc3 3 3 lDb5 'ii'd 31 34 g3 Much as White would love to eliminate the b-pawn, it is poisonous after 34 �xb2?? i.f4+.

56


Wtsl Grischuk finds clever methods of slowly eroding White's pawn cover around his king. 3 5 f3 Once again the pawn is immune: 3 5 l:txb2? Wxf2+ 3 6 'it>h 3 ltJe4 3 7 l:tb3 .i.e3. 3 5 -tc l

34

...

...

Question: Why didn't White return the exch ange in order to eliminate the b-pawn ? Answer: Unfortunately for White, it is too late to bail out with 3 6 l:txc1 bxe1W 3 7 Wxc1, since after 37 ... ltJd3 38 Wb1 Wxf3 his position is hopeless. 36 b5! Threatening to undermine the knight with ...b4. ...

3 7 g4

Once again, bailout attempts fail : 37 l:txc1 bxc1W 38 Wxc1 b4 39 ltJb1 b3 40 ltJd2 'i'c2 wins. 3 7 Wf4+ 3 8 'it> g2 We 3 ! Nice. The queen creeps closer t o White's king and Black clears f4 for his knight. Now 39 ttJxb5 fails to 39 ...ltJd3 40 Wf1 ltJf4+ 41 'it>h 2 Wd2+ 42 'it>h 1 ltJe2 43 'i'f2 Wd3 44 ltJa3 .i.e3 45 'i'e1 .tc5 ! . 39 'i'c2+ ltJd3 4 0 ltJxbs 'it> h6! 0-1 A cute unpinning and winning move. Black has too m any threats and Rybka claims a forced mate in 1 2 ! ...

Summary

11 e5 i s a reasonable alternative to 11 .i.d3, but Black does get more counterplay against this move.

57


Came 6

K.Sasikiran-S.Rublevsky

Foros

2007

1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lLlf3 lLlf6 4 lLlc3 dxc4 5 a4 ..ifs 6 e3 e6 7 ..ixc4 lLlbd7 An odd move order which doesn 't change anything. Normally Bl ack plays 7 ... ..ib4 at this point. 8 o-o ..ib4 9 'iVe2 o-o 10 e4 ..ig6 11 ..id3 ..ihs 12 es lLld s 13 ..id2 ! ? White refuses t o commit t o either lZJxdS, which w e examined in Games 2-4, o r lbe4 lines, and keeps the position in stasis. Let's take a closer look at 13 lLle4, and follow the game J .Ehlvest-D.Barua, Yerevan Olym piad 1996: 13 ... ..ie7 ! (standard operating procedure: Black covers sensitive dark squares on the kings ide while clearing b4 for his knight) 14 lLlg 3 ..ig6 1S ..ixg 6 fxg 6 ! .

Black follows the principle: Capture away from the centre i f you feel that your king's safety is under threat. Capturing away from the centre slightly weaken s Black's structure, but this is easily compen sated by the rook's activity on the f-file and heightened king safety. The game continued 16 as a6 17 lZJe4 h 6 18 lbe1 l:.fs 19 lLld3 lLlf8 20 .l:td1 g S 21 'ir'g4 'ir'e8 22 lLlg 3 'ir'g 6 ! . A brilliant positional exch ange sac to take over the light squares and get the king side pawn s rolling. Ehlvest wisely declined it, after which his space and Black's light-square control bal anced each other out. Returning to 13 ..id2, the only difference between this game and the previous one (David-Grischuk) is the position of the light-squared bishops. In David-Grischuk, White's bishop was on c4 and Black's on g6. Such subtle shifts should be noted because in the two games we execute radically different plan s ! 13 ... c s !

58


An ambitious move which attempts t o immediately dismantle White's centre. The al ternative is the solid 13 ... .te7; for example, 14 lZJxdS cxds 1 5 'ir'e3 lZJb8 ! 16 .l:l.fc1 lZJc6 17 l"Llel �g6 with equality, A. Rychagov-A.Khalifm an, Moscow 2009. Question: It seems very difficult to determine when to play the ... c s break, and when to sit tight and refrain . Are there any guidelines Black can foll ow as to when ... c s i s playable and when it's not? Answer: Deciding if and when Black should play ... cs is one of the toughest challenges of the Slav. Here are a few guidelines you can follow to determine whether you should play the move or not: 1 . Black had better not lag in development at the mom ent of ... c s or you could get blown away in the centre. 2. If there is a traffic jam of White pieces on the d-file, as in this g ame, you m ay be in a better position to play ... c s since a white rook won 't in stantly appear and attack Bl ack's queen on the d-file. 3. It is generally better to play ... cs if White's knight is not on c3 (unlike this game, which would be an exception to this rule). The reason is after lZJxds you will normally be forced to accept an isolani on dS which could become a target for White. 4. If you have White's f3-knight pinned, then ... cs is more likely to be playable for Black. Conclusion : The line between when to play and when to avoid ... cs is often blurred. Fre quently one small shift in the position changes the assessment from no to yes ! Intuitive understanding and proper timing of ... cs (or not!} is something that develops over time as you play the Slav. 14 lLlxd s .txd21 Black's clever point. Now we begin to see some of the problems with White's 13th move:

59


1. White's f3-knight can't recapture due to the pin and his pieces are thrown a bit out of sync. 2. Recapturing with the queen damages White's pawn cover around his king. 3 . The weakness of Black's future isolani on ds will be outweighed by the structural damage White sustains around his king. Conclusion : This i s an example of a well-timed ... cs break. 15 •xd2 .ixf3 16 gxf3 exd 5 17 f4 cxd4

Question: Is thi s really so bad for White?

--------�

Answer: Let's break down the position : 1. White has a good bishop, controls more space with his advanced e-pawn and m ay be able to attack along the open g-file. 2. Black has an extra, doubled d-pawn but he won 't be able to keep it.

60


3. Black's knight is a very strong piece. I t can b e m anoeuvred t o c s , e6 o r g 6 depending on circumstances. 4. White's king m ay become exposed l ater. s. Those broken white pawns could get hit with a well tim ed .. .f6 ! pawn break. Conclusion : Maybe the chances are dynamically balanced but I still prefer Black, whose attacking chances and superior pawns look to me to outweigh White's plusses. 18 .:tfc1?! Question: It looks l ike White i s trying to play positionally. Shouldn 't he go for a direct attack with 18 �h 1? Answer: I think you are correct in suggesting 18 �h 1 ! , which m ay be the most thematic way to play the position. White just goes for a direct attack with everything he has. The following is a logical scenario: 18 ... l2Jcs 19 ..tc2 lk8 ! 20 l:.a3 (White gets overextended after 20 'i'xd4? l2Je6 21 'ii'd 3 'ii'h 4 22 fS lDd4 23 ..td1 'ii'f4!) 20 ... l2Je4 21 'ii'e 2 'ii'b 6 22 ..txe4 dxe4 2 3 'i'xe4 'ii'xb2 2 4 .:tg 3 lUeS 2 S l:tfg 1 g 6 2 6 fS 'ii'c 2 27 'ii'f4 l:tcs 28 :g s .:.exe s 29 fxg 6 'ii'c 6+ 3 0 f3 fxg6 31 1:txe s :xe s 3 2 'ii'x es 'ii'xf3+ with perpetual check. 18 .. .l:te8 19 ..tfs l2Jf81

20 :ta3

20 'i'xd4 1eads to position s similar to the game after 20 ... l2Je6 2 1 'ii'e 3 'ii'h 4 2 2 .ixe6 fxe6 23 .Ue7 1:te7. 2o ...lue6 21 :g3

White doesn't h ave the time for 21 �h 1 ? ! in view of 21 ... 'it'h4 22 :f3 'ii'h s ! 23 'ii'd 3. 21 'ii' h4 22 ..txe6 22 .:tg4 'ii'h s 23 ..txe6 fxe6 24 l:.g s 'ii'f7 2 S 'ii'xd4 :tac8! doesn't change the picture much. 22 fxe6 2 3 'ii'x d4? Drifting into passivity, which is a death sentence in m ajor piece endings. It was time for White to take bold action and sac a pawn for activity: 2 3 l:tc7 :e7 24 ...

...

61


:txe7 'ii'x e7 2 5 fS ! exfs 2 6 'ii'x d4. The resulting position looks quite difficult to win for Black, despite his extra pawn . 2 3 .. J�e7

Time to assess: 1. White is burdened with a doomed f4-pawn. Black simply gangs up on it with all his m ajor pieces. When the f-pawn falls, White's king faces serious trouble. 2. White's control over the c-file doesn't mean much. 3 . White can't get anything going on the open g-file either since Bl ack h as adequate de fence of g7. 4. White has a tiny bit of pressure on Black's queenside pawns. Conclusion : White's structural defects leave him fighting for his life. 24 l:tcc3 .l:tf7 2 S l:td3 b6 26 'ii'c 3 .:.af8 27 'ifc6 'ii'e 7 28 .Ug4 g6

The white rooks h ave been tied into a pretzel in their attempts to salvage f4. 29 'itg2 'itg7 30 'ii'c 21 62


Question: The queen o n c6 put pressure o n the e6-pawn. Why did White back up voluntarily? Answer: If White remains passive and marks time with his king with 30 g1?, Black has the manoeuvre 30 .. .-l:lfs 3 1 g 2 h S ! (bumping White's rook from the defence of f4) 3 2 l:tgg 3 l:txf4 and f4 has fallen. With 3 0 'iVc2 ! White pressures g 6 and al so retreats the queen for defensive purposes to cover f4. 30 .'i'b4! 31 l:th4 White gets tied into a knot after 31 'iVc6? hs 32 .l:.h4 'iVe7 33 h 3 l:.fs . 31 :.ts 3 2 Itfh 3 h s 3 3 1:tg3 Targeting g6 in order to hold on to f4. 3 3 'it>h7 34 l:tc3 h6! 3 5 ltg3 ..

...

...

3 S .'i'e7! ..

Question: Can Black win the ending after 3S ...'W'e4+? Answer: Bl ack should probably go on to win after 36 'ii'x e4 dxe4 37 l:tc3 g S ! 38 fxg S+ 'it>xg S 39 .Uxe4 .:txf2+ 40 g 3 l:txb2, but it m ay not be all that easy to convert in the double rook ending. Rublevsky prefers to keep queens on the board to h arass White's insecure king . 36 .l:.hh3 36 Wh 3 'iVe8 ! picks off either the f4- or a4-pawn . 36 .'i'e8! Covering his soft spot on g6. White's position crumbles. 37 .U.gs l:txf4 3 8 llhg3 ..

63


Exercise: Black can take on f2. I s two rooks for a queen and pawn a good deal for Black?

�___.

----

38 ...l:.xf2+1 Answer: Yes, the rooks are no match for the nimble queen, which will pick off white pawn targets.

Answer: No, Black's queen soon roams about at will. Watch ! 39 'ii'xf2 %lxf2+ 40 'iftxf2 �h71 So that %lxg6 doesn't come with a check. 41 b3 'iff8+1 Throwing White's rooks out of alignment. Black's queen goes on to perform a one woman show for the remainder of the game. 42 %lf3 An unfortunate necessity since 42 'itt e 2? loses quickly to 42 ...'ii'a 3 ! 43 %lxg6? 'in>2+ 44 'ittf1 'in>l+ 45 'itt e 2 'ii'x g6 46 %lxg 6 'ittx g6, winning the king and pawn ending. 42 ...'ii' b 41 Threat: ... 'ii'd 2+ picking off the stray rook on g S . 43 'itt g 3 'ii'e 1+ 4 4 � h 3 'itt h 61

64


4 5 .l:.gg3

Question: Why wouldn 't White want to line up on the g 6-pawn with 45 l:lfg 3 ? Answer: After 4 S .. .'il'f1+ 46 ltg 2 'ii'f3+ 47 lt2g3 'ii'e 4 4 8 b 4 d4! the d-pawn m arches down the board. Remember the Brady Bunch episode when little Bobby and Cindy got lost in the Grand Canyon ? Somehow White's confused rooks remind m e of the lost Brady kid ordeal . 4S 'ii'x es The game is over. White's rooks and king are no m atch for Black's queen and two cen tral passers. 46 l:.f7 as 47 ltb7 'ii'f S+ 48 Wg2 ii'e4+ 49 Wt2 d4 so ltxb6 d3 S1 ltd6 Dropping a rook, but it obviously didn't m atter at this point. 5 1 'i'f4+ 0-1 ...

...

Summary

I am suspicious of the wishy-washy 13 i.d2 ! ? and tempted to give it a dubious m ark. 13 ... c5! is a good answer which probably offers Black a shade better than equality.

Game l

L.Polugaevsky-E. Torre

London 1984 1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 ltJf3 ltJf6 4 ltJc3 dxc4 s a4 i.fs 6 e3 e6 7 i.xc4 i.b4 8 o-o o-o 9 'ili'e2 ltJbd7 10 e4 ..ig6 11 i.d3 i.hs 12 i.f4

The bishop clamps down on the key e s -square and White refuses to commit to the e s advance, keeping Black guessing a s t o when o r i f he will play it.

65


Question: If Black can't play for ... es, what should h e do? 12 .. J:te8! Answer: Ah, but he can play for ... e s with this excellent reaction . Black either forces White to play es or Black forces it through himself. 13 es Question: I don't get it. If White chose i.f4 on his l ast move to avoid playing es, then what induced him to play it thi s move? Answer: If White continues his strategy of containment with 13 l:tfd1 ? ! , it fails miserably to 13 ... e s ! . For example, 14 dxe s lZ:lxes 15 i.c2 'Was 16 t2Ja2 i.f8 17 l:tab1 (M.Simonet Pons M. Ubach Miralda, Spain 2003) and here in stead of 17 ... h6 Black h as 17 ... l2Jxf3+! 18 gxf3 lLldS ! . 13 ...lt:Jd s 14 lt:Jxd s cxd s 15 h 3 i.e7 A logical move but m aybe not the most accurate . ... i.e7 covers his sen sitive kingside dark squares and prepares the standard manoeuvre ... l2Jb8 and ... l2Jc6. But the move is mis timed and allows White a rook lift on the third rank later on. 1S ... a6 ! should produce equality after 16 g4 i.g6 17 i.xg6 fxg 6 18 'it>g 2 1'1c8 19 i.e3 lZ:lf8, as in A.Khalifm an-E.Bareev, Neum 2000. 16 :fc1 a6 17 l:tc3 !

66


17 .ixf3?1 ...

Black doesn 't sense the danger to his king yet. Question: Couldn't Black gain a tempo with 17 ... .t.b4? ---

Answer: No, it is Black who loses the tempo. After 18 .:tc2, White's rook is h appy on the c file, whereas Black has been induced into moving his dark-squared bishop for the third time. Maybe it was time to go into Petrosian mode by 17 ... i.g 6 ! 18 i.xg 6 hxg6 19 l:tb3 ! l:ta7 ! (keeping b8 available to redeploy his knight) 20 as ttJb8 2 1 'ii'd 2 ttJc6. White h as some pres sure on the queen side and a nagging space advantage. But Bl ack h as reasonable chances to hold. The b7-pawn is the only real weakness, and Black can defend it easily. Al so, he h as a good bishop with most of his pawns on the opposite colour. 18 'i'xf3 lDb8? Black's last ch ance for survival l ay in 18 ... ttJf8 ! 19 fLac1 'i'd7 20 'i'd1 r!ec8.

67


Exercise (multiple choice): Whi ch is White's most effective continuation ? a) 19 '5'h s; b) 19 'ii'g 4; c) 19 .txh7+.

19 .txh7+1 It is a very rare sight indeed these days to see a GM fall victim to the Greek gift sac. Po lugaevsky's mon ster calculation powers worked out the details of 19 .txh 7+! to m ate. 19 'ir'h s and 19 'ii'g 4 are not forceful enough to put Black away. 19 . .'iti>xh7 20 'ii' h S+ 'iti>g8 21 l:tg3 g6?1 Allowing White a glorious finish. Marginally better was 21 ... .tf8 22 .tg s 'ii'c 8! (intend ing to send in the reserves with ... 'ii'c 2 and ... 'ir'h7) 2 3 1:tc1 lLlc6 24 .tf6 lLlxd4! (what else?) 25 l:txg 7+ .txg7 26 l:txc8 l:taxc8 27 'ii'g s lLlfs 28 g4 'iti>h 7 29 gxfs .txf6 30 'ii'xf6 l:tg8+ 31 'iti>f1 and Black doesn't have the resources to cover his multiple pawn targets, but at least he is still kicking. .

22 l:txg6+1 I would bet money on it that Polugaevsky, who Fischer said was an incredible calculator in forcing lines, h ad visualized up to move 3 3 , an impressive 21 ply, when he sac'ed this rook. 22 ...fxg6 23 'ii'x g6+ 'iti>h8 24 'ii' h 6+ 'iti>g8 25 'ii'x e6+ 'iti>h8 Maybe Black should opt for assisted suicide with 2S ... 'iti>f8 ! 2 6 .th 6 m ate. At least then his sufferin g would end sooner. 26 'ii' h 6+ 'iti>gB 27 it'g6+ 'iti>hB Question: I don't see anything better than a perpetual check since a3 i s out as a possible rook lift, and I don't believe queen and bishop provide enough firepower to deliver checkmate. Does White have m ore than a draw?

68


Answer: White wins. Exercise: As a training exercise, give yourself 1 5 minutes from this position to find a method of bringing White's rook into the attack. Simply look at the remainder of the gam e for your answer. 28 'i'hS+I �g8 29 �h61

The subtle point. Black i s forced into a swap of his dark-squared bishop, after which the white rook swoops in on a3. 2 9 .if8 Only move. 30 'i'g6+ �h8 31 i.xf81 Removing the last meaningful defender. 31 ltxf8 32 'i'h6+ �g8 33 .Ua3 1 1-0 ...

...

69


The culmination of White's attack. His rook enters with fatal effect, for example 3 3 .. .ht ltJb4 17 ltJf4 i.xd4!? Question: Why give up the bishop pair in an open position? Answer: Taking on d4 ensures that Black's bishop on g 6 will never get shut out of the game by e3-e4. 18 exd4 ltJ8c6

19 i.e3 Question: Why didn't White unload and trade off his i solated d-pawn with 19 ds? Answer: White felt he would be swapping one problem for another and probably feared Black's enormous piece activity at the end of the line 19 ... exd5 20 liJxds liJd3 2 1 i.e3 .l:te8, but perhaps this was still the better way to play it for White. 19 ttJa s1 Powerful positional play from Sokolov. Black not only gives himself the option of picking off White's good bishop, but also halts any dS ideas from White. 20 l:.c1 lle8 Thinking about opening with ... es in the near future, despite White's bishops. 21 c;t>g2 'iff6 22 'it>g3 ! (see following diagram) Desperate and strong ! The white king takes it upon his shoulders to seize stewardship of the beleaguered kingside. Let's assess: 1. White doesn't feel safe anywhere on the kingside on the norm al squares like g 1 or hl and decides g 3 is his safest option for his king . 2 . O n g3, the king not only keeps Black's queen out o f the h4-square, but also prepares to attack with h2-h4. 3 . I like 22 'it>g 3, if only because it throws unusual problems at Black to solve over the board and creates m aximum resistance in what is arguably a rotten position. ...

75


Conclusion : Sometimes desperation i s the mother of creativity. 22 ... l:tad8 23 h4 A key point of his l ast move. 23 ... esl

N aturally Black i s h appy to begin a brawl in the centre if White's king i s h anging out close by on g 3 ! 24 tt:Jxg6 'ii'x g6 2 S l:tc7 lZJxb3 2 6 it'xb3 lZJd s? Inaccurate. After 2 6 ... exd4! 27 i.d2 tt:Jds 28 l:txb7 it'd6+ Black gets the position he got in the game but with the key difference being an extra pawn on d4. 27 l:txb7 exd4 28 i.xd4 it'd6+ 29 f4 l:te4 30 i.xa71 Why not? Black i s down two pawns, and should his attack fail, White wins on the queens ide. 3o ... h s ! Creating a puncture wound o n the light squares around White's king. 76


31 gxh s tt:Je7!? Another possibl e attacking line could be 3 1 ...'ifh6 3 2 .l:.b8 .l:.xb8 3 3 'ii xb8+ �h7 34 'iic 8! and it is anybody's game to win or l ose. 32 -.bS? White's ambition induces him to overreach. Ern st m ay h ave underestimated his oppo nent's firepower on the king side and rather recklessly goes for the win . White can play safely with 3 2 .:b8 ! .:e3+ 3 3 .ixe3 tt:Jf5+ 34 �h 2 .:txb8 3 5 'iic 3 tt:Jxe3 3 6 'iix e3 .:xb2+ 3 7 llf2. Here Black forces the draw due to the exposed position of White's king : 3 7 ....:txf2+! 3 8 'iixf2 'i'b4! 39 �g 3 'Wxa4. 32 ...-.f6 33 'iig s ltd3+ 34 �h2 'We6 35 'iig 2 The h3-square must be covered: 35 i.f2 ?? 'ifh 3+ 36 �g 1 .:ee 3 ! wins. 3s ...tt:Jfs 36 .:b6 Attackers swarm White's king and no defence works. For example: a) 36 'Wg4 .l:.e2+ 3 7 l:f2 .:dd2 3 8 �g l .l:.dl+ 39 �h 2 'We4 40 'ii'g 2 ltxf2 41 .ixf2 'ii'xf4+ 42 .ig3 tt:Jxg 3 wins. b) 36 .:b8+ �h7 3 7 .if2 l':.xf4 with too m any threats. 36 ...-.e71 37 .:bS+ �h7 38 'ii'g s

Exercise (multiple choice}: Sokolov missed an immediate knockout here. Can you find it? The choices are: a) 38 ... tt:Jg 3 ; b) 38 ... .:e2+; c) 38 ... 'ife6

38 ...-.e6?! Answer: Sokolov missed the killer a) 3 8 ... tt:Jg 3 ! which win s m aterial in all lines due to the double attack on the rook on fl and bishop on a7. 39 .:bs?l His last prayer was 3 9 .:e8 'ii'x e8 40 'ii'xf5+. 39 ...tt:Jd41 0-1

77


White's hope lies dead by the side of the road, and he can't deal with the multiple threats on bS, f3, e2 and h 3 . S u m m a ry

When facing the 9 ttJh4 line, I suggest you take a chance, buckle up your seatbelt and try the radical option 9 . .ltg4!?, which leads to a wild ride for both sides. ..

Game 9

V . Korch noi-R.H ii bner

C h icago 1982 1 tiJf3 d S 2 d4 ttJf6 3 c4 dxc4 4 ttJc3 c6 5 a4 .Jtfs 6 e3 e6 7 .Jtxc4 .ltb4 8 o-o o-o 9 'Wb3

78


Question: Besides the obvious threat t o Black's bishop, what are some of the i deas behind 9 1i'b3 ? Answer: The main ideas behind 9 'it'b3 are: 1. You already mentioned that Black's bishop on b4 is now attacked. 2. Should the bishop retreat then b7 is l oose. 3 . After Black deal s with his b4-bishop, White plays lbh4! and chases down the bishop on fS . Having played 'ifh3, Black doesn 't h ave ... �g4 hittin g a queen on d1. 4. White realizes that Black will eventually hit back in the centre with either ... es, or more likely ... cs. Should this happen, White can then play dS. A queen on b3 stays off the open d-file and away from ... :ds ideas from Black. 9 .. .'i'e7 ! Very useful : Black's queen covers b4, protects b7 and helps prepare for both . . .es and ... c s breaks. 9 ... 'i'e7 ! scores better for Black than 9 ... 'it'b6, where it is vulnerable to as! tricks from White later on. Observe the continuation of L. Ljubojevic-D.Stellwagen, Amsterdam 2009: 10 tt:lh4 lbbd7 11 lbxfs exfs 12 l:td1 l:tac8 13 �d2 c s ? ! (mistiming his bid for freedom) 14 .tbs .:tfd8 1S a s ! (the ever-alert Ljubojevic finds a reason why Black's queen is precariously placed on b6) 1S ... 'i'd6 (1S ... �xas ?? 16 lbds ! wins) 16 dxcs �xes 17 �e1 and White squeezed his opponent later with his bishop pair. 10 tLlh4

There are a few other tenth -move option s for White: a) After 10 �d2 as 11 l:tfe1 lbbd7 12 e4 �g 6 13 e s lbds 14 �g s 'ii'e 8 1 S lDd2 h6 16 �h4 lLl7b6 17 i.f1 lbe7 ! White's piece placement m ade an odd impression in W.Uhlmann Z.Ribli, German League 1993: 1. Black is ready for ... lbfs, which hits both the weak d4-pawn and the bishop on h4. 2. Black owns the ds- and b4-squares. 3 . White can try to get a knight to d6 but Black's bishop covers that square, so this shouldn't overly concern him. Conclusion : Black already looks like he stands better. b) 10 lbes as 11 f3 lbfd7 12 lbxd7 (exch anges in general favour Bl ack; I would try to keep pieces on the board with 12 lbd3) 12 ... 'Wxd7 13 1:td1 lba6 14 e4 �g 6 1S �f4 and White stood a shade better in M.Botvinnik-A. Bykhovsky, Tel Aviv 1998. And before you even ask the question, I will answer: No, this is not the three-time World Champ playing White. It's some other guy with the same name and first initial ! c ) 10 as c s ! 11 dxcs �xes 12 h 3 lbc6 13 lbh4 .l:tad8 14 lbxfs exfs 1S lbds lbxds 16 i.xds. Now in stead of 16 ... �b4?!, as in P. Ricardi-D.Campora, Buenos Aires 199S, Black should play 16...lLlb4! 17 �f3 g 6 with an excellent position. Let's return to Korchnoi's choice, 10 lbh4:

79


Question: White will definitely get the bishop pair but what should we do with our bishop on fS?

�-----

Answer: There are three schools of thought: 1. Do we play 10 ... �g4 h ere? If we do, White chases us around with moves like f3 and g4, and then takes when our bishop gets to g6. Now it is up to you to decide if the free moves f3 and g4 are useful attacking moves for White, or if f3 and g4 constitute the seed of White's future overextension. 2 . We retreat the bishop to g 6 and after White takes, we play ... hxg6. This is solid but passive, and lacks counterplay for Black. I don't care much for Black's position. White has the bishop pair and some extra central space, and should be quite happy with his position. 3 . Black just leaves the bishop where it i s and when White swaps on fs, we recapture with our e-pawn. Thi s one i s a bit more dynamic than Option 2 because our fs-pawn fights for the key e4-square. My pick of the three would be the sharpest line, Option 1, as played in the game. But if you are okay with a draw, perh aps Option 3 would suit you best. 10 . . . �g4!? The m atador waves his red cape in the face of the already enraged bull. It took courage to play such a move against Korchnoi, who was a pretty scary opponent in 1982. Let's take a look at Black's tenth move alternatives: a) 10 ... �g 6 i s the one I don't really care for. Black is just too passive for my taste. After 11 ltJxg6 hxg6 12 as c s 13 dxcs �xes 14 �d3 �d6 1 S ltJbs �cs 16 �d2 ltJc6 17 a6 ! l:tfd8 18 l:tfd1 :ab8 19 �e2 ltJds 20 axb7 .l:r.xb7 2 1 'iia4 Black i s solid but still struggling against that bishop pair in the open position, W.Browne-R.Henley, Lone Pine 1980. b) 10 ... �d6 i s Option 3: Black leaves the bishop alone on fS . 11 ltJxfs exfs 12 h3 (to pre vent cheapos on h 2 ) 12 ... as ! (preparing to occupy b4 with his knight) 13 'iid 1 ltJa6 14 b3 ltJb4 15 'iif3 ltJe4 16 ltJxe4 fxe4 was A.Groszpeter-V.Kupreichik. Black h as excellent play in

80

Th e M a i n li n e D u tc h Va ria t i o n

return for White's pair of bishops, with control over dS and a cramping pawn o n e4. 1 1 f3 i.hs 12 g4 i.g6 13 gs?! Benjamin Franklin once declared: "Moderation in all things - including moderation ! " Korchnoi possesses a magnetic trait which endears h i m to u s all . From time to time, h i s courage and t h e force o f his will t o win exceed his reason ! I sometimes dream of a world where White players resist the urge to blow us Slav guys off the board, but alas, I despair that it will never be so. After Korchnoi l ost his 1968 Candidates m atch to Spassky, he said he was vanquished because he was too reckless with his pawns, but also claimed that he h ad learned his les son ! Really? ! Korchnoi's last move looks rather precarious. It seem s the old lion still cannot resist the urge to shove his opponent across the board. He should probably remain on the side of angels and common sense, and implement a risk-mitigation strategy beginning with 13 ll'lxg6 hxg6 14 e4, with chances for both sides. 13 ll'ld s 14 e4 ll'lb6 1S ll'lxg6 hxg6 16 i.e2 Time for an assessment: 1. White own s the bishop pair. 2. White controls huge tracts of territory, including the centre and kings ide. 3. There is the potential for White's overextension. ...

Exercise: White owns the bishop pair. Shoul d Blade risk opening the game with 16 ... c s ?

16 csl ...

Answer: Black should fear getting squeezed without counterplay more than he should fear the white bishops. Question: I assume you believe Black's break i s well tim ed?

81


Answer: Absolutely. Black follows two principles: 1. Counter in the centre when attacked on the wing. 2. Trade when cramped. The opening of the centre provides Black with freeing trades in the moves to come. 17 d 5 This leads t o complication s favouring Black. Question: Since 17 dS leads to problems, should White liquidate in the centre with 17 dxcs ? Answer: Liquidating doesn't help White after 17 . . ..txcS+ 1 8 'it>h 1 lt:'lc6 1 9 aS ltJd4 2 0 'if'd1 lt:'ld7, as played in L. Polugaevsky-E.Torre, Toluca 1982. Black's powerfully centralized pieces and dark-square control give him the advantage here. 11 ... exd s

18 a 5 ! Question: Why i s Korchnoi plunging into such complications? I sn 't the simple 18 lt:'lxds a better option? ----

Answer: No, it i s White who gets booted around after 18 ... ltJxdS 19 'if'xds l:td8 20 'if'h 3 lt:'lc6: Black i s ahead in development, rules the central dark squares, h as a mon ster hol e to occupy on d4 and White looks overextended. 18 ... c4! Opening up cs for his pieces. 19 'if'd1 d4! This classic central counter to a wing attack takes over the initiative and White's ship begins to take on water. 20 axb6 dxc3 21 bxc3 After 21 bxa7? cxb 2 ! 22 .txb2 lt:'lc6 Black's c-pawn is secure due to ... 'if'cS+. He will play 82


. . .bs creating a pair of connected passers and then capture o n a7. The four queens on the board after 2 1 bxa7? cxb2 ! 2 2 axb8'it'?? bxal'it' would be a bit of mind trip, but here Bl ack is having his way and is up h eavy m aterial. 21 .ixc3 22 lba7 tDc6 2 3 l:txa8 lixa8

a

...

let's assess: 1 . The sickly b6-pawn is barely hanging on. 2. Black's powerful c-pawn can't be touched due to ... 1\t'cs+. 3. All of Black's pieces are aggressively posted whereas White's pieces sulk on the first two ranks. Conclusion : White begins to feel the backlash of his earlier rash pawn moves and hangs on for dear life ! 24 �h1

24 .ie3 lidS 25 'it'c1 'it'b4! would be similar to the game continuation . 24 .f:.d8 25 'it'c2 'it'b41 26 i.. e 3 i..d 21 ...

83


Principle: When your opponent h as the bishop pair, remove one of them. 27 .l::t b 1 'tWa s 28 �xd2 Now White bleeds on the dark squares. However, 28 �g l c3 i s crushing for Black. 28 ... .l::tx d2 29 'ii'xc4 'ii'x gs 30 .l::td 1 .l::t b 2 31 .l::td 7 At last White generates a threat: m ate ! 31 ...l:tb1+ 3 2 �d1 'ii'f41 Hitting f3 and covering the threat to f7. 3 3 'ii'e 2 .l:bb6 Winning a pawn and eliminating the threat of .l::tx b7. 34 'ii'a 2 ttJes 35 .l::td 8+ 'itt> h 7 36 'ii'g 2 If 3 6 'ii'a 8, then 3 6 ... g s 3 7 'ii'c 8 g4! 3 8 .:h 8+ 'itt> g 6 and White's attack is at an end. 36 'ii'h 4 37 :td s .l::t b 1 38 'ti'f1 f6 39 'ii'e 2 Or 39 f4 .:b2 40 �e2 4Jg4 with threats everywhere. 39 gsl .•.

. ••

Thi s is an overexten sion nightmare for White: 1. Black i s king of the dark squares. 2. White's pinned bishop i s the baddest of bad bishops. 3 . White's king barely h as a pulse and rests on life-support, with the plug about to be pulled very shortly. 40 'itt>g 1 'ii' h 3 1 The wrecking crew arrives and there i s no reasonable way t o protect f3. 41 'ii'c 2 tiJxf3+ 0-1 (see following diagram) White doesn't want to wait around to see 42 'itt>f2 .:b2 ! picking off the queen . 42 'itt>h l 'ii'fl m ate isn't much o f a n improvement either! S u m m a ry

M y advice i s t o g o over thi s game twice. Hubner's play i s a perfect blueprint o f how t o over extend and punish White when he charges at you with his kingside pawns in the Slav. 84


Game 1 0

B.G u l ko-C.La kdawa la

U S Cha m pion s h i p, La J o l l a 2004 Few chess players are admired as much as GM Boris Gulko. It's not just because he is a great player whose achievements include winning the 1977 USSR Champion ship and hav ing a plus score against Kasparov. Gulko is admired even more for his courage in facing down a repressive government when he and his wife Anna went on a hunger strike, which eventually forced USSR leaders to back down due to worldwide negative publicity. Eventu ally they yielded to the force of the Gulkos' combined wills and all owed the dissident cou ple the freedom to immigrate to the U SA in 1986. 1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lbf3 lbf6 4 lbc3 dxc4 5 a4 ..tfs 6 e3 e6 7 ..txc4 ..tb4 8 o-o o-o 9 'ii'e 2 ..tg4

85


This line with 9 ... i.g4 is my personal quirky favourite in the m ainline Slav. Question: Why do you favour ... i.g4 over ... i.g6? What are some of the differences between the two moves? Answer: My reasoning behind playing to g4 is this: 1. When Black moves his bishop to h 5, it often takes this path : fS, g6, hS. Three moves for the bi shop. 2. When we play the ... i.g4 lines, the bishop gets to the d1-h 5 diagon al in just two moves. However, this may not con stitute a real gain of tempo since the bishop on g4 can get kicked immediately, while the bishop on h s cannot. 3 . The real reason is probably psychological. I just have a tendency to favour slightly off beat, quirky lines because it is much more likely my opponents are more in tune and booked up on the main lines. As soon as I play 9 ... i.g4, White usually goes into a think, in dicating he is already out of his theory. 10 h3 In our next game we examine the more common 10 l:td1 t2Jbd7 11 e4.

10 i.xf3 1? •••

Question: Why did you give up the bishop pair? Answer: Several reason s: 1. White has structural weaknesses but plan s on attacking soon . Every piece off the board helps Black defend. 2. White's knight control s the key es-square. Eliminating the knight makes it a lot easier for Black to pl ay the freeing ... es pawn break. 3. Taking on f3 leads to a more positional struggle than the more complex 10 ... i.h s. I am not in Gulko's class, but my strategic skills are closer to his over my calculation abilities, so I go with a position which plays to my strength . 86


The alternative is the more provocative 1 0. . .-th s : a) 11 .1:td1 tt:'lbd7 12 e 4 'ifc7 13 e s tt:'lds 1 4 .td2 .t e 7 was J.Stocek-I.Sokolov, Warsaw 2005. Perhaps White m ay still claim an edge after 1 5 as but this i s the kind of position a Slav player shoul d be able to live with . b) 11 g4!? .tg6 12 tt:'les tt:'lbd7 1 3 f4 was A.Shirov-X.Rechi Montes, Andorra (simul ) 2001. Now in stead of 1 3 ... .txc 3 ? ! , I like Black's chances in the complication s stemming from 13 ... tt:'lxe s ! 14 dxe s tt:'le4 15 fs tt:'lg 3 . 11 'ifxf3 tt:'lbd7 12 l:.d1

12 Jtc8 ..

Question: Can you forgo ... l:.c8 and swing your queen in immedi ately with 12 ... 'ifas ? Answer: That is also playable. The position becomes unbal anced quickly after 13 e 4 es 14 ds. For example, 14 ... tt:'lb6 1 5 .tb3 .txc3 16 bxc3 cxds 17 exds .l:.ac8 18 c4 1lfe8 19 .td2 'i'a6 20 d6 ! tt:'lbd7 was G .Kasparov-E.Bareev, Novgorod 1994. White's bishop pair and super activity mean more than Black's structural advantage. Such positions are really difficult to play for White without overextending, and difficult for Black to avoid getting pushed off the board! luckily, m ost of us don't face Kasparov as our opponent too often. 13 e4 es

87


14 �e3 Question: Pinning the knight on f6 l ooks more aggressive and also more logical , doesn't it? Answer: The pin is logical but falls prey to a little tactic from Black after 14 �g 5 ? ! exd4 1 5 l:txd4 tt::le 5 ! 16 'iid 1 'iie 7. Suddenly White has problems: 1. His bishop on c4 is hit. 2. His e-pawn looks tender. Black threatens ... tt::lg 6 and ... �xc3. 3 . If White trades bishop for knight on f6 to ease the pressure on his e-pawn then Black rules the dark squares. 14 'Wa 5 14 .. .'ife7 m ay be a possible improvement. Black looks fine in the following lines: a) 1 5 d5 tt::lb 6 16 �b3 cxd5 17 tt::l x d5 tt::lb xds 18 exds b6. b) 1 5 'iif5 ! ? :cd8 16 dxe s tt::l x es 17 �e2 �c5 ! 18 �g 5 l:tfe8 19 �xf6 'ifxf6 20 'ifxf6 gxf6 and Black's dark-square control should compensate him for his damaged kingside pawn structure. 15 d 5 1 ? This new move in the position was Gulko's home preparation for our game. Strangely enough, it has never been repeated by anyone since this game. Possibly this is because 15 'iff5 ! gives White a safer edge after 15 ... exd4 16 'ifxa5 �xas 17 �xd4 ltfe8 18 f3, as in P.Leko-B.Gelfand, Moscow 2006. White may claim a minimal edge after 18 ... �b6 !, which eliminates the bishop pair and weakens White's control over the dark squares. Still, I don't mind playing Black in such a position. ...

88


15 i.xc3 ...

I wasn't crazy about Black's position in the line 1 S ... lt:Jb6 16 i.b3 i.xc3 17 bxc3 cxds 18 exds �xc3 19 l:tab1. For the pawn White has: 1. Two bishops against two knights in an open position; 2. A dangerous passed d-pawn; and 3. Fantastic activity for all his pieces. 16 bxc3

16 cxd 5?! ...

Perhaps it was time to grovel with the line 16 .. .'ihc3 17 dxc6 bxc6 18 l:tac1 "ii'a 3 19 .ba7 "ii'xa4 20 i.e3 when despite the extra pawn, Black is fighting for the draw. Unfortu nately for me, I conceived the idea to grab my opponent's a-pawn in broad daylight! My idea reminds me of P.G. Wodehouse's statement about one of his goofier characters: " H e had something o n his mind - a dangerous condition for o n e of his mental capacity!" 1 7 i.xd s lt:Jcs 89


Avoiding a few false path s: a) 17 ... �xc3?? 18 ..td2 ! �xf3 ? 19 ..txas .l:tf4 20 g 3 lif3 2 1 �g 2 and Black's rook has no place to hide. b) Nor did I trust Black's ability to hold the game after 17 ...ttJxds? 18 l:txds it'c7 19 iffs and now: b1) 19 ... ttJb6 20 lieS ! it'd8 2 1 it'xe s picks off a pawn . b2) 19 ... it'xc3 20 �c1 'i'xe3 21 fxe 3 l:txc1+ 22 �h 2 ttJb6 2 3 :xe s and it's doubtful Black can hold things together. 18 c4! I had dreamed about the line 18 'i'g 3 ? ! ttJcxe4 19 it'xes it'c7 ! when Black achieves dy namic equality. 18 ttJxd 5 19 cxd 5 ttJxa4? I should just pl ay 19 ... b6 and hope for the best in this deceptive position . •..

I was l ater told that two IMs in the analysis room claimed Black was better or even win ning due to the two passed queenside pawns. At the board, I suddenly began to sense the awful truth that my entire greedy idea was a mistake. Question: Why? Answer: White's d-pawn moves up the board with great force to tie Black up. Black just doesn't have the leisure of slowly pushing the passed b- and a-pawn s up the board. There is a line in the Grunfeld where White sacs a pawn and gets a powerful ds-pawn in exchange for Black's passed b- and a-pawns. This position is similar but even worse for Black! A parable for you: I have a boneheaded terrier, Kahless, named after the Klingon mes siah, who truly believes himself to be king of king s ! Twice a year Kahless repeats the same stupid error. In the middle of the night Kahless, who fancies him self as guard-dog extra ordinaire, hears an intruder, barks madly, rushes into our yard through the dog door and

90


charges a skunk. The following events transpire with depressing regularity: 1. Result: Skunk 1 - Kahless o. The fool gets sprayed. 2. Kahless panics, runs inside and jumps on our bed reeking of skunk spray. 3. Nancy and I give Kahless a de-skunking bath in the middle of the night. 4. Our house stinks of skunk for days on end. All my students h ate me and threaten to find a teacher whose house doesn't smell of skunk. s. General misery ensues among the entire Lakdawala clan. 6. I am constantly reminded by my wife and son of how this is all my fault for adopting a mentally challenged terrier. (I found Kahless as a stray puppy outside the G ambito tour nament I play in every Saturday.) Unfortunately I share the same failing as Kahless. Time and again I underestimate dy namic factors (i.e., Gulko's Frankenstein d-pawn ! ) in favour of static elements like one measly, worthless extra pawn . N o m atter how hard I try to avoid it, I keep repeating this error! 20 'i'fsl f6 Black can 't survive 20 .. Jlfe8 2 1 d6 .:.cd8 2 2 d7 .:.e7 2 3 :tds bs 24 l:xes l:.xes 2 5 'ifxe s h 6 26 J:tc1 ! . 21 d 6

This genetically enhanced i.iber-pawn soon makes my life miserabl e ! The uninvited guest makes himself at home deep in my territory - much like the Salahis, who sneaked into the White House and crashed President Obama's first state dinner in honour of the Indian Prime Minister. 21 .U.cd8 22 'ii'e 6+ ltf7 I sorely wanted to eliminate that bugger on d6 but realized that I would get blown out in the line 2 2...'it>h 8 ? 2 3 l:.dcl! 'Wb4 24 .U.c7 .l:txd6 2 5 'ife7 llg 8 26 i.h6 ! l:td1+ 27 l:txd1 'ifxe7 28 J:txe7 gxh6 29 l:tdd7 ! . ...

23 J:tdc1!

Threat: ltc8. 91


23 Wf8 24 l:tc8! Threat: l:txa4!. 24 bs 2 5 l:tac1! 1-0 •••

•••

Now I understand what it feels like to be a mouse, still alive after being swallowed whole in the digestive tract of a python ! White threatens both 26 l!lc7 and also 26 .l:lxd8+ followed by l:tc8. There is no defence. After the game, Gulko showed me a mindbender line: 25 d7 l:te7.

Exercise (multiple choice}: Find the combin ation G M Gulko showed me after the game. The choices are: a) 2 6 'ifd6; b) 2 6 'ifdS; c) 2 6 i..b 6

Answer: All three moves win, but 2 6 1t'd6 and 2 6 'ii'd s are not really combinations, just strong moves! The an swer is the amazing interference move 2 6 i..b 6 ! ! . Gulko told me that

92


despite having seen the line, there was no reason t o get fancy when there was a trivial win with the move he played. Try to work out the win for White after 26 i.b6 ! ! on your own. S u m m a ry lO ... i.h s

i s an interesting possibility for Black shoul d he choose to increase the complica tions. Maybe Black should m ake White pay with some pawn weaknesses before h anding over the bishop pair so quickly. Game 1 1

C.Va n Buskirk-C.La kdawa l a

Southern Ca l ifornia C h a m pions h i p, I rvi ne 1998 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 lt:'Jf3 lt:'Jf6 4 lt:'Jc3 dxc4 5 a4 i.fs 6 e3 e6 7 i.xc4 i.b4 8 o-o

8 0-0 ...

Question: What is the difference between 8 ... ttJbd7 and 8 . 0-0? ..

Answer:

8 ...tt:Jbd7 is a bit sharper because Black still has the possibility of queenside cas

tling .

Question: When would Black castle queenside? Answer: Take thi s scenario: White plays lt:'Jh4 chasing the bishop on fs. Black retreats the bishop to g6 and White takes it. After ... hxg6, Black opens the h-file on White's king . Possi bly Black may want to castle queenside and m ake it an opposite-wings attack. Here is an example: 8 ... tt:Jbd7 9 lt:'Jh4 i.g6 10 tt:Jxg6 hxg6 11 h 3 'ikc7 12 'ike2 g 5 13 f3 0-0-0, V.Chuchelov-F.Cuijpers, German league 2002. Compare Ern st-Sokolov (Game 8) where Black already castled when White played 9 lt:'Jh4.

93


9 'We2 .ig4 10 l:ld1 White doesn't want to get sucked into early overextension with h3 and g4, and holds off on these moves for now. He is content to grab central space without weakening his king side pawns. 10... ll:lbd7 11 e4 l1c8

Question: This is a mysterious move. Can you explain the reasoning behind it? Answer: Well, in a few moves I plan on getting in the freeing advance ... es. When I do, I want to discourage White from bypassing with dS. If he does this, I play ... cxds and my rook on c8 is suddenly: 1. On the open c-file; 2. Hitting his bishop on c4; and 3 . Hitting his knight on c3 in conjunction with my bishop on b4. 12 .if4 Logical - White develops a piece and fights for the key es-square. In the next two games we'll look at alternatives. 12 ...-wa s Triple-purpose: 1. Black adds pressure on c3 and threatens to win a pawn. 2. If White avoids e4-e 5 then Black may play ...'Wh s, increasing the heat on the f3 pin. 3 . The queen helps with the liberating ... e s break if White doesn 't push his own e-pawn to the fifth rank.

94


13 es

This m ove probably all ows Black equality. White's best shot at a n edge lies i n 13 lt:la2 ! . Let's follow the game N.Sulava-B. Kohlweyer, Lido Estensi 2002: 1 3 . . ..i e 7 1 4 b 4 'ii'h 5 (the a4pawn is taboo for Black: the greedy 14 ... 'il'xa4?? is punished simply by 15 �db1! threaten ing to trap the queen with either lt:lc1 or lt:lc3 next m ove) 1 5 h3 .txf3 16 'il'xf3 'il'xf3 17 gxf3 a6.

Question:

Do you think White stands better? If so, why?

Yes, I think White hol ds an edge for the following reason s: 1. Bishop pair; 2. Strong central control ; and 3. A queen s ide and central space advantage.

Answer:

95


Question: So i s Black l ost? Answer: Certainly not. Black also has some plusses: 1. A super solid, weakness-free position; and 2. The potential to take advantage of the slight weakening of White's doubled f-pawns. Conclusion : White does h ave the edge but a Slav player shouldn't fear playing Black in such a situation. We Slavazoids like to lurk in dark corners and bide our time for our coun terattacks ! 1 3 lDd s 14 lDxd s Forced, since Black hits both c3 and the bishop on f4. 14 ... cxd s 15 ..ibs?! •..

Question: H ow could White's last move possibly be dubious? It g ains a tempo on Black's knight. Answer: The Slav is a subtle opening, and often an obvious-looking move may not be the best. 15 ..ib5 ? ! chases Black's knight to exactly where it wants to go, b8 and then c6, as we've already seen on m any occasion s. It is White's bishop which is misplaced and also a target for ... a6. So the reality is that it is actually White who loses the tempo. Better was 15 ..id3 ! 'ii'd 8 ! 16 h3 ..ih s 17 g4 ..ig6 18 �g2 ..ie7 19 h4! lDb8 20 hS ..ixd3 21 'ii'x d3 lDc6 with mutual chances, Y. Razuvaev-A.Chernin, Tilburg 1994: 1. White enjoys more space in the centre and on the kingside, and generates attacking ambitions. 2. Black's position i s weakness-free. If he survives the coming attack, his chances in a late middlegame or ending l ook very good due to White's structural weaknesses which in clude a hol e on b4. 15 ...'ii'd 8 16 l:tac1 lDb8 17 �xeS 'ii'x c8 Black welcomes swaps since he h as the superior pawn structure and would love to play

96


an ending again st White's numerous pawn weaknesses. 18 i.d 3

There is the tempo loss. White's bishop gets out of town before Black hits it with ... a6. 18 Ji'd8 Getting off the open c-file and planning to attack the queen side with ...'ii'a 5. ..

19 'i'e3 1

As we saw in Topalov-Kramnik (Game 2 ) , thi s is a m anoeuvre you should b e aware of from White's side. He: 1. Usefully gets out of the pin ; 2. Covers d4; 3. Increases his hold on the kingside dark squares; and 4. Prepares l'bg 5 ! , which m ay induce weaknesses or encourage Black to give up the bishop pair with ... i.e7 and ... .Yt.xg 5. 1 9 l'bc6 20 h 3 .ihs .••

Exercise: Come up with a plan for White.

--------�

21 ..ibs?l

Certainly not this, which i s an aimless m ove. In the coming moves, White's position be gins to deteriorate because he has trouble finding a concrete plan. Answer: A logical line for White would be 2 1 �cl 'ii'a 5 2 2 l'bg 5 ! .ig6 (be very careful to avoid careless weakening moves like 2 2 ...h 6 ? which h ands White a ferocious attack on a steaming plate after 2 3 l'bh 7 �d8 24 'ii'g 3 'ith8 2 5 l'bf6 ! ) 2 3 .ixg6 hxg6 24 b3 'ii'b 6 2 5 l'bf3. White doesn't seem so badly off here. His queenside weaknesses don't look life-threatening and maybe he can try to m ake progress on the kingside by pushing his h-pawn forward. I would assess the position as equal here, although I would insert my Slav bias and take Black if given a choice.

97


21 'ii' b 6 Double purpose: it covers c6 again st structural damage in case of .txc6 and adds pres sure to the d4 weakness. 22 g4 Weakening his position, but h anding over the bishop pair and light squares with 22 .txc6 'it'xc6 looks even worse. 22 .tg6 ...

...

23 1Ic1 Question:

H ow shoul d Black react if White attacks with 23 h4?

In such situations Black must vigorously counter or else face execution on the kingside: 23 ...h 5 ! 24 gxh s (Black would love a sealed kingside after 24 g S) 24 ... -txh s. White probably doesn't h ave time to attack along the g-file because Black threatens ... .txf3 fol lowed by chopping off White's d4 pawn . After 2 5 .te2 Cf:Je7, White's attack is nonexistent and now fs can be added to his list of weak squares. 23 Cf:Ja s Intending ... a6. The knight has potential on b3 or c4 later on . 24 .td3?! Back again. White just can't find a plan he is happy with, and a swap of light-squared bishops will just leave him saddled with a bad dark-squared bishop. He should play 24 .tg 3 and foll ow with h4 to try to get something going on the king side. 24 .te7 25 .txg6? I have seen chess writers m ake the declaration : "A bad plan is better than no plan at all." I tell you emphatically as a three-decade chess teacher, this is patently untrue ! A bad plan sinks a position faster than Usain Bolt in the 100-metre dash ! 2 S fxg6 Answer:

...

...

...

98


Of course. My e6-pawn isn't a weakness at all and m y rook gets a free open file. Now White's king safety becomes an issue. 26 1:.c2 lbc4 27 'Wc1 gsl

Here my opponent must have regretted his 2 5th move. The f-file h as turned into a bleeding ulcer for White, who now faces trouble on f4, f3 and f2 . 28 i. xgs White also gets h orribly overextended after 28 lbxg 5 .txg s 29 .txg s 'Wxd4 30 'iie l lif3 and the position is virtually identical to the game continuation . 28 Jbf3 29 i.xe7 'Wxd4 ..

White's position has congealed into an ugly mass of indefensible pawn weaknesses and he can resign h ere. 30 'it>g2

Or 30 'iifl �g 3+ 31 �h 2 lib3 32 i.d6 .Uxb2. 30 'i'e4 31 �h2 'Wxe5+ 3 2 �g2 'ii'e 4 3 3 �h2 'iid 3 0-1 ...

99

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve Summary

I g et 1 0 .l!td 1 as th e most common r espons e from my oppon ents and it may b e mor e fl exi bl efor Whit ethan 1 0h 3. Game12

A.Sebekis-C.Lakdawala

Gam bito (rapid), San Diego 2007 1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3lZ'lc3 lLlf6 4lZ'lf3 dxc4 5 a4 .tfs 6 e3 e6 7 .txc4 .ib4 8 o-o o-o 9 'We2 .tg4 9 . lLlbd7 1 0 e4 i.g4 1 1 .l:td 1 is anoth er mov eord er to r ea ch th egam eposition. 10 .Ud1lZ'lbd7 11 e4 l:tcs 12 .tgs!? A rar emov e. .

.

Question: Should Bla ck toss in 1 2 ..h6? .

Answer: 1 2...h6 looks logi cal b ecaus e th en Bla ck has an es cap e hat ch for his bishop in cas e it g ets chas ed with h 3 and g4 lat er. On th e downsid e ...h6 slightly w eak ens Bla ck's kingsid e, but I think ov erall it's a good mov e. 12 ...'Was

13 .txf6?! Question: You didn' t like this move,bu t doesn' t i t look okay for Whi te? Afterall, Whi tereasons tha t this couldla terbeco me a badbishop andrushes to swap i t off. --------

Answer: I find s ev eral d ef ects in this plan: 1. Whit egiv es up th e bishop pair in a s emi-op en position. 2. Whit e, with his extra spa ce, will b eatta cking th e kingsid e. tI isn't logi cal to r edu ceth e 1 00

Th e M a in l in e Du tc h V ar ia ti on numb er of pi eces on th eboard wh en you ar ea t ta cking. Th eprin cipl es ar e: a) Avoid swaps wh en you hav eyour oppon en t in a cramp ed si tua tion. b) Avoid swaps wh en you a t ta ck th eoppon en t's king. 3. Al though Whi t e's bishop had th e po t en tial to b ecom e a bad bishop, i t s till fough t for som eimpor tan t dark squar es. Now Bla ck's grip on th e dark squar es in cr eas es. 4. Som etim es th er e is sa c po t en tial wi th th e dark-squar ed bishop. For ins tan ce, wh en Bla ck toss es in ...h6 h e mus t worry abou t ..txh6 id eas. Now Bla ck is fr ee from th e f ear of th esesa cs. Whi t e should probably go for 13 e s lL'ld s 14 lL'le4. Aft er 14... lL'l7b6 15 .i.d3 h6 16 .i.h4 ! .tf s !, Bla ck has a d ecen t gam e and can follow up wi th .. J:tf e8 and ... .i.f8 s ecuring his king side (bu t no t th e naiv e 16... lL'lf4? 17 lbf6 +! g xf6 18 'i'e4 wi th a pow erful a t ta ck in th e works). 13 lbxf6 14 eslL'lds 1SlL'le4 .i.e7 ...

Question: Why did you r etr ea t volun tarily? Answer: 1 S... .i. e7 s erv es two purpos es : 1. It cl ears b4 for a knigh t. 2. It mak es i t mu ch hard er for Whi t e to su ccessfully sa con f6 la t er on. 16 h3 .ths 17 '1t>h21? Whi t e plans an all-ou t a t ta ck, s tar ting wi th g4, whi ch looks lik e th e b eginning of an ov erlyrisky plan. His posi tion isn' t good as h esuffers from th efollowing troubl es: 1. A w eak d-pawn. 2. A w eak en ed qu eensid e, wi th hol es on d s and b4. 3. D epl et ed chan ces on th e kingsid edu e to his earli er swap on f6. 4. Bla ck has th ebishop pair, whi ch is rar ein main lin es of th e Slav. Con clusion: Th e odds of Whi t e's a t ta ck working ar e low. Bu t th e al t erna tiv e plan to jus t pa tientlyd ef end all his w eakn ess es wi thou t s eeking coun t erplayisn' t t emp ting eith er !

1 01


17 ....ig6 18 g4?1

sI i t my imagina tion or ar e mos t players on th e Whi t e side of a Slav this hyp er aggr essiv e? Wha t is i t abou t us li t tl e Slav guys tha t provok e this r ea ction? 18 g4? ! is th e logi cal follow-up to Whi t e's las t mov e, bu t probably wrong. Jus t look at tha t gaping hol eon f4. Bla ck mayop en th ef-fil e to try to exploi t this w eakn ess. 1s ...fs Mayb e my oppon en t's aggr ession rubs off. 18...f s is bas ed on th e prin cipl e: coun t er in th e cen tr ewh en a t ta ck edon th ewing, bu t i t mayno t b e th e b es t mov e. Th e qui et 18...'ii'b4 ! thr ea t ens to ov erload Whi t e's qu een wi th th e thr ea t ... .ixe4 and improv es Bla ck's gam ewi thou t risk. For exampl e: a) 19 :del .ixe4 2 0 "it' xe4 ii' xb 2 pi cks offa pawn. b) 19 l'Llg3 l'Llf4 2 0 'ii'e3 "it' xc4 2 1 "ii xf4 cs and th e gam e op ens up to th e advan tag e o f Bla ck's bishops. 19 exf6 "ii c7+ 20 'itth1

1 02

Th e M a in l in e Du tc h V ar ia t ion

Question: Should Bla ck tryto ent er a sup erior ending with 2 0 ... .i.xe4 2 1 'ifxe4 llxf6 22 lld 3 ._f4? Answer: Bla ck g ets an ending but 'I m not so sur eabout th e "sup erior" part of it . Aft er 2 3 .ixd S ! cxd S 24 'il'xf4 .Uxf4 25 �g 2 �c2 26l::t.b 3 Whit es eems to b e holding things tog eth er . 2o .ixf6 21 .ixds?l Th e wrong plan . My oppon ent r eli es too mu ch on a knight outpost and und er estimat es th edang er to his king . tI isn't that easy for Bla ck to mak eprogr ess aft er eith er 2 11I e1 l:tce8 2 2li:'l xf6 + .Uxf6 2 3li:'l e s or 22 ...g xf6 !? 2 3 .Ua 3. 21 exds 22li:'lxf6+ ...

...

Question: Should Bla ck r ecaptur e with th erook,allowing Whit e's 'knight an outpost on e s, or th epawn whi ch pr ev ents li:'l e s but blo cks th e f-fil e? Answer: n I this cas e capturing with th e rook is sup erior. Som etim es on e must tak e a chanc eand giv e up som ething in ord er to g et som ething ev en mor e valuabl ein r eturn. 22 Jbf6! Black's atta ck along th e f-fil e outw eighs th e tow ering knight on es. 2 2 ...g xf6 2 3 .Ua 3 :ce8 24 .Ue3 'ifb6 also provid es Bla ck with a saf e edg e, but I b eli ev e not as mu ch as Black ge tsin th egam e continuation . ..

23 li:'les !:tdB

Question: Did you miss a combination h er e? 2 3 ... .i.e4+24 f 3? • xe S!. Answer: Your combination works but you must consid er all possibl e d ef en ces . Whit e can m eet 2 3 ... .ie4 + with 24 �g l sid est epping your combination . Still, mayb e I should hav e played your sugg est ed mov e sin ce th er e was a chanc e that Whit e may hav e fall en into th e tra p,and if h esaw th etrap my position do esn't look bad at all aft er 24 �g l.

1 03


2413?! A mistak e. To b efair though, Whit edidn't hav eany r eally gr eat alt ernativ es at hand.

Exercise (multiple choice}: With his last mov e Whit eallows Bla ck a small combination . Can you find it?a ) 24 ... .i.e4; b ) 24 ...:txf 3; c) 24.. . c s Answer: 24 ltxf31 f 3 turns out to b ea soft targ et. 25lDxf3 llxf3 26 'ii'h2? 26 'ii'xf 3 was th eonly pray er . Aft er 26. . ..te4 27 'ii'x e4 d xe4 28 l:ta 3 'Wa s ! 29 l:te3 'ii'xa4 30 l:td2 'ii'b4 3 1 :td e2 'ii'xd4 32 .l:l xe4 'ii'd s Bla ck will cr eat e qu eensid epass ed pawns and win . 26 ...llg3! Bo xing in Whit e's king. 27 lle1 'ii'f4 0-1 ..•

1 04

Th e M a in l in e Du tc h V ar i a ti on Th edual thr eats of 28 .. ..ie4 +and 28 .. 'ii'f 3+ can't b em et . .

.

Summary

1 2 ..ig S ? ! may b e all right for Whit e, but h e should hang on to th e bishop and avoid swap ping it for th eknight on f6 . Game13

A.Morshedi-C.Lakdawala

Gam bito (rapid), San Diego 2008 1 d4dS 2 lDf3 l2Jf6 3 c4c6 4 l2Jc3 dxc45 a4 ..ifs 6 e3 e6 7 ..ixc4

Question: I hav es een 7 a s !? play ed h er e. What is th eid ea? Answer: Jam es Vigus writ es in Play th e Slav: " This is a positionally d esirabl e advan ce with thr ee virtu es: it gains spa ce and pot entially ti es down Bla ck's qu eensid e, it cl ears a pa th for th e qu een to a4, and it r edu ces Bla ck's control of th e k ey outpost b4 . On th e n ega tive sid e, how ev er, it is Whit e's fifth pawn mov e alr eady, and do es not troubl e Bla ck's smooth d ev elopm ent " . Th e r evi ews ar e mi xed: G M Sosonko do esn't lik e th e mov e du e to the t empo loss wh er eas G M Ward giv es it thumbs up in D angerou s W eap ons: Th e Qu een' s Gambit. 7 ..ib48 0-0 0-0 9 'ii' e2 ..ig410 �d1 l2Jbd7 11 e4l:.c8 12 es ttJds 13 l2Je4 ..ie71 ...

Agood mov e, sugg est ed to m e by G M Al ex Goldin . 1 3 ... ..ie7 ! cl ears b4 for a knight, r ein forces f6 against futur e sa cs and k eeps an ey eon im portant kingsid edark squar es lik eg s. Question: Why mano euvr earoun d lik ethis and r emain cramp ed? Can Bla ck blast through th e centr ean d gain fr eedom with 1 3 ... c s?

__.

__

1 05


Answer: Absonotly ! 1 3...c s? is a pr ematur e br eak which r eminds m e of th e Janis Joplin lyric "Fr eedom's just anoth er word for nothing l eft to los e." Black is not y et r eady for a fist fight in th e c entr e and th er e is no n eed for such a radical solution. I tri ed th e mov e on G M Goldin onc e and land ed in an inf erior position quickly af t er 14 .1g s 'ii'b6 15 tt:'ld6 l:Ic7 16 .1 xd s ! exd s 17 .1 e7 ! .l:ta8 18 h 3 .1 xf 3 19 1i'xf 3 tt:'l xe s 20 d xe s .l:txe7 2 1 'ir'xd s, A. Goldin- C. Lakdawala, Am erican Op en, Los Ang el es 1997.

Black has a prosp ectl ess position h er e. Som e of his probl ems includ e: 1. Whit e's pow erfully c entraliz ed pi ec es outgun Black's. 2. Whit e's knight is impr essiv ely p erch ed on th e mountaintop on d6, wh er e it hits k ey points in Black's position. 3. Whit e's advanc ed e s-pawn is a thorn for Black who f eels r estrict ed du e to its influ enc e. 4. Whit e's ma jority on th e kingsid e looks cl early sup erior to Black's blockad ed ma jority on th equ eensid e. s. Black's bishop stinks on b4, wh er e it do es nothing but shoot offinto op en spac e, at tacking nothing and going nowh er e. 6. Whit e has exc ell ent chanc es of pulling offa winning attack against Black's king. Conclusion: Black has many strat egic strik es against him and may b e clos e to bust ed, i f not th er eright now.

Question: W ell? Didh epull offth e winning attack in your gam e? Answer: Umm... I can't r ecall ! L et's not dw ell on things long past and mov e on to this gam ewhich is far mor eint er esting ! 14 h3 .1 h s 15 b3!? (see following diagra m) A n ew mov e in this position, with Whit e planning to fianch etto his dark-squar ed bishop. L et's ass ess its m erits: 1. A bishop on b 2 prot ects d4 and also discourag es Black from th e ...c s br eak sinc e this

1 06

Th e M a in l in e Du tc h V ar ia t i on would only in cr eas eth e bishop's s cop e.

2. tI allows Bla ck a ccess to f4 with his knight, and also th e bishop do esn't aim at h6 whi ch is a targ et sa csquar efor Whit e. Con clusion: Fian ch ettoing is int er esting and playabl e, with both strong and w eak points to th e id ea. Pr eviously Whit e had tri ed 15 g4 ..ig6 16 h4 !? with a fist fight ah ead in L.Yurta ev S.Kayumov, Tashk ent 2 007. 1s ... i.g6 16 ..ib2 a s tI is always us eful t o lo ck down th eb4-squar e, esp ecially wh en Bla ck has no int ention of playing ... cs lat er. 1 711 ac1 lDb4 18 "ii' e3!? Wasting tim e,as a Bla ck knight r ea ch es d s, but my oppon ent has an int er esting plan in mind. 18 ...l2J b6 19 liJfd2 ! This is th e id ea: Whit ewill not ba ck o fffrom c4. fI Bla ck ev er captur es, Whit e r ecaptur es with a knight whi ch h eads dir ectly for d6. 19 ... ltJ6d 5 20 "ii' g3!? I thought this was a strang e mov e sin ce Whit e oft en engag es in a pawn storm on th e kingsid e and th e qu een on g 3 blo cks th e path of Whit e's pawns. Mayb e h e just want ed to k eep an ey e on d6 in cas eon eof his knights r ea ch ed that squar e. Possibly h e had atta cking ambitions on th e kingsid eand d ecid ed to transf er his qu een to th evi cinity. 20 ...'iti> h81 Th e id ea is to avoid any l2Jf6 + tri cks and also to b e abl e to play ...f6 and r ecaptur e with th eg-pawn to play on th eop en g-fil e. 21 i.fll H eading for d6 with th eknights. 21 ... i.h5?! Atypi cally shallow G/4 0 mov e and on e not v eryw ell thought out. Whit e's rook is b ett er 107

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve on eland inhibits Bla ck from playing ...f6 . So ess entially I us e up a t empo to for ce my op pon ent to play a mov ewhi ch is v ery us eful to him !

22 1:te1l"Ll a2 23l:l a1l"Ll ab4 24l:l ac1l:l c7 D eclining to r ep eat mov es. Playing for th e full point com es with risk sin ce Whit e's knights r ea ch m ena cing positions on c4 and e4 . 25l"Ll c4 l:td7 26l"Ll cs l:tc7 27l"Ll e4 Avoiding th e ch eapo 27 l"Ll xa s?? b6. 27 ... b6 On ce again d eclining th e r ep etition of mov es whi ch l eads to a draw aft er 27 ... l:td7 28 t"Ll cs. 28 i.e2 i.g6 Originally I had int end ed 28 ... i.h4 29 'iWh 2 but th en thought b ett er of it sin ce I didn' t wantmy oppon ent to cl ear th eway for a kingsid epawn storm .

29l"Ll ed6? 1 08

Th e M a in lin e Du tc h V ar ia ti on Thos etwo whit e knights ar erunning around in cir cl es lik e puppi es on l eash es. Th ey run around d eep in Bla ck's t erritory but fail to find an effectiv etarg et to do mu ch damag e. Morsh edi ov erlooks on e point, whi ch is that th e knight on e4 k ept Bla ck's dark-squar ed bishop out of g s. B ett er to play 29 ..tft l:.d7 30 l:tcd 1 with an equal position . 29 .. -t gsl Sudd enly Whit e wish es his bishop was ba ck on th e c1-h8 diagonal, and his knight ba ck on e4 . Bla ck's pi ece a ctivity ris es consid erably on th e kingsid eand central dark squar es . 30 l:tcd1 ..tc2 3 1 l:ta1 ..tf41 .

0 brav e n ew world that has su ch bishops in it ! ( I apologiz e to th e r ead er for b eing so

obno xious about my mov es .) Whit e's qu een is es cort ed to f 3 wh er e it is vuln erabl e fa cing Bla ck's rook on f8, and wh er e it must continu e to babysit th e w eak b 3-pawn . Bla ck's pi eces cr eat e a taffy-pull ef f ect on Whit e's position, yanking him in both dir ections: A pair of knights and a bishop hamm ering away at b 3 and c2 on th e qu eensid e, and on th e kingsid e a dark-squar ed bishop whi ch harass es Whit e's qu een,th eonly d ef end er of b 3. 32 'i'f3 f6 Whit e's pi eces ar eout of alignm ent, b 3 and c2 ar e chroni cprobl ems, and his qu een is in dang er with th ef-fil eop ening soon . 33 g31 Th e b est d ef ensiv e mov e in a bad situation. Whit e cr eat es a cubbyhol e on g 2 for th e harass ed qu een and k eeps Bla ck's pi eces out of f4 . 33 ... .ih6 34 exf6 l1 xf6 Whit eis bust ed:b 3 falls sin ce Whit e's qu een is d eni ed a ccess to e3, d 3 and c3. 35 'i'g2 ..txb3 Not only grabbing th epawn but also op ening up c2 as a fork squar e.

1 09


36 lDe4 Th er e is nothing b ett er and Whit emust cough up mor emat erial. 36 .. J:tf 8 3 7 lDes lDc2 38 .ia3 lt:Jxe1 39 �xe1 lt:Jb4 40 .ixb4 axb4 41l:l b1

41 ... .ixa4? Sigh... I n ev er miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Bla ck mops up with 4 1... 'ii'd S! 4 2 .if 3 .ic2 ! 4 3 l:txb4 'it'a s 44 l:.c4 .ixe4 ! 45 .ixe4 'ii'e l+! winning instantly. 42 l:.xb4 .ic2 43 .id3 .ixd3 44 lt:Jxd3 cs 45 .l:.xb6 'ii'x d4 46 �d6 'ii'a 1+ 47 '1t> h2 0-1 Bla ck should win without mu ch diffi culty. At this point I stopp ed r ecording mov es and won th etim es crambl eaft er coming p erilously clos eto bungling it lat er on! Summary

Th e timing of playing or avoiding ... cs is ev erything in th e main lin es of th e Slav. 1 3... ..ie7! is an improv em ent ov er my gam e against G M Goldin wh er e I lash ed out pr ematur ely with 1 3... cs?. This gam e is also an exampl e of a mainlin e Slav wh er e Bla ck forgo es ... cs and still g en erat es enough play. 110

C h a pte r Two

6 lbes

1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3!D f3!D f6 4!D c3 dxc4s a4 ..tfs 6!D es

Tim e for your n ext criti cal chall eng e. Som e sour ces a ctually giv e 6!D es as th e main lin e ov er 6 e3 from Chapt er 1. D espit e th e fa ct that 6 !D es is th e curr ent darling of th e World's best play ers, at club l ev el you g et 6 e3 mu ch mor eoft en. n I th e first four gam es of this chapt er w e examin e 6...!Dbd7, th e simpl est and possibly best of Bla ck's r espons es. Whit em eets this with two possibl eplans: 1. Play f 3 and e4, booting away Bla ck's bishop and taking control ov er th e centr e; or 2. Play Catalan-styl e with g 3, r ecapturing on c4 with his es-knight. At th e appropriat e mom ent Whit eaims for e4. You must hit ba ck at som e point with a ... cs or an ... es br eak, or els e you stand wors e. W epay clos eatt ention to su ch br eaks and th eir timing in this chapt er. Th e last thr ee gam es of th e chapt er w e look at my quirky favourit e 6...!Da6 ? ! . I dub this lin e " Tony's Big Adv entur e" aft er my fri end G M Tony Mil es, who play ed it with Bla ck. Warn111

Th e Sla v: M o ve by M o ve ing: Som e of th e positions I advo cat e ar epr etty s cary for Bla ck and may caus e th e soda you drink to com e shooting out of your nos e. That said, I f eel this lin e is th eor eti cally playabl e (although I am in a minority among Slav exp erts ) and you can qui ckly tak e your oppon ent out of his knowl edg e zon e if you l earn this on e. fI you play 6... lLia6, you mak e your lif e a lot mor e diffi cult, but your oppon ent's too . I r emind you of an an ci ent Chin es e saying: " n I th e middl eof diffi culty li es opportunity " ! Game14

V.Topalov-Wang Vue

MTel Masters, Sofia 2009 1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lLif3 lLif6 4 lLic3 dxc4 s a4 ..ifs 6 lLies

Question: sI n't it unnatural to r egain th ec-pawn by moving th e knight twic ewh en with 6 e 3 (Chapt er 1) Whit esimultan eously r ecaptur es th epawn and d ev elops his f 1-bishop? Answer:6 lLies isn't as natural as 6 e3; how ev er, th emov edo es hav esom egood points: 1 . Aft er th e knight mov es, Whit e can play f 3 and e4 slamming Bla ck's bishop on f s and taking full control ov er th e centr e. 2 . Whit e may lat er d ecid e to play Catalan styl e and fian ch etto his bishop mor e effec tiv ely on g2 rath er than post it on c4 wh er eit normally hits a pawn wall on e6 . 6 ... lLibd7 Th e simpl est mov e. fI you want to mak e your lif e a lot mor e diffi cult th en you can try my favourit e mov e in th e position, 6. .. lLia6 ? ! , th e Tony's Big Adv entur e variation, whi ch w e examin e lat er in this chapt er . 7 lLixc4 lLib6

112

6 ti:J e s

On ce again th e simpl est mov e: Bla ck wants trad es sin ce h e is cramp ed and chas es White's knightwith tempo . 7 .. :iic7 and 7 ... e6 ar e also compl ex lin es whi ch, for spa ce r easons, w e won't cov er . Ev eryman Ch ess d eclin ed my v ery r easonabl er equ estto author a 1,000pag e ch ess book . S ti:J es

Question: Whit ek eeps moving this knight ov er and ov er . I r ealiz e that Whit eshould avoid trad es but8 e3 do esn'tlook so bad to m e. Can Whit eplay this mov e? Answer: t I isn'tthat8 e3 is bad; it's mor e that th e mov e is notfor ceful enough and ital lows Bla ck equality: 8 ... e6 ! ( Bla ck corr ectly waits until White's bishop mov es b efor e trading on c4 ) 9 �e2 ti:J xc4 1 0 �xc4 �d6 1 1 a s? ! (h e should probably just con ced e easy equality with 1 1 f 3 es) 1 1 ... 0- 0 1 2 a6? ! ( White wastes a lot of tim e and all h e a ccomplish es is th e potential fall of his a6-pawn later in th e gam e) 1 2 ...b s 1 3 �d 3 �xd 3 14 'it' xd 3 e s and Bla ck alr eady stood b etter in N K . el ecevi c-H H . amdou chi, Porr entruy 2 006 . s as ...

Question: What's thepoint of s ..a s? .

Answer: Doubl epurpos e: 1 . W elo ck down on our hol eon b4 . 2 . W epr ev ent White from annoying us with a s in th e futur e. Question: Can Black draw byr epetition of mov es if h econtinually chas es Whit e's knight with 8 .. lDbd7? .

Answer: Moving our knightfor th e third tim eis a blund er whi ch los es material for Bla ck aft er 9 'iih 3 ! ti:J xe s 1 0d xe s ti:Jg4 1 1 'it' xb7 ti:J xe s 1 2 f4 ! .

1 13

Th e Sla v: M o ve by M o ve 9 f3

Whit e logi cally b egins to clamp down on th e centr e. W e also examin e 9 g 3 (in Gam es 16- 17 ). 9 .. .liJfd7 R em emb er: Ev ery trad e h elps Bla ck.

Question: Why notth eoth er knightto d7?

___,

______

Answer: Two r easons: 1. By playing ... tt'lfd7 ! w e don't giv e Whit e th e option of tt'lc4 sin ce th e b6-knight li es in wait cov ering that squar e. 2. Bla ck l eav es op en th e possibility of ...f6 in cas e h e n eeds to chall eng e a whit e pi ece or pawn on e s. 10 e4

1 14

6 tLJ e s

Question: Waita minute! White allows his pawns to b ecom e doubl ed and his castling rights ruin ed? Whatis wrong with 1 0 l'tJ xd7 follow edby e4 n extmov e? Answer: 1 0 tLJ xd7 is th e main mov e and w e cov er it n ext gam e. tI 's hard to say whi ch mov eis White's b est chan cefor an advantag e. As you will s ee, 1 0 e4 also contains a sting to it. 10 ...tLJ xes 11 dxes Th e combativ e 1 1 exf5 !? is also possibl e but I don't think White g ets as mu ch. For ex ampl e, 1 1... tLJ ec4 1 2 ..wb 3 tiJd6 1 3 ..td 3 g6 14 g4 ! ..tg7 15 ..te3 tDd7 16 0- 0- 0 ..wb6 17 'it' xb6 tLJ xb6 18 f xg6 h xg6 with an unbalan ced qu eenl ess middl egam e, M. Carls en- Wang Vu e, L eon 2 009. 11 .'ii'x d1+ 12 �xd1 .•

Question: Was 1 1 d xe5 wis e? White compromis ed his kingsid e pawn ma jority wh er eas Bla ck's is h ealthy on th e qu eensid e. Also, Whitelosthis castling privil eg es . Answer: All tru e, but th e pow erful cramping effect White gains from e5 and th e son of e5 ( e4 ) chok es Bla ck on th ekingsid e. Th eloss of castling rights is no big d eal for Whit esin ce qu eens ar e offth eboard. His king finds sh elter on c2 and can also parti cipate in th e com ing fight. So 1 1 d xe5 ! is a good mov e. 1 2 ... ..te6 I lik e this mov e mor e than 1 2... ..tg6 whi ch may also b e playabl e. N.Vitiugov- Ni Hua, Ningbo 2 01 0, continu ed 1 3 ..te3 tDd7 14 e6 ? ! f xe6 15 ..tc4 e5 16 �c2 e6 ! (a sound inv est m ent: Bla ck simply r eturns th e pawn in ord er to unrav el ) 17 ..txe6 ..tf7 18 ..txf7 + �xf7 19 l:Lhd 1 �e6 and Bla ck a chi ev ed full equality. n I many of th e gam es I r es ear ch ed in this and similar positions, Whit e s eem ed to fli ck in th e e5- e6 pawn sa c. Whit e play ers loath e allow-

115

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve ing positions lik e 14 f4 e6 . H er e Bla ck can always play .. f. 6 at a lat er dat e to g et his offsid e light-squar ed bishop ba ck into cir culation . 13 'Wt c2 f6 Th e main lin e, in whi ch Bla ck att empts to r emov e th e e s-bon e from his throat . H e logi cally chips away at e s, but I'm not a fan of th ethankl ess positions Bla ck g ets lat er . Th er eis a dynami cid ea for Bla ck coming from th emind of th eth en 1 1-y ear-old Magnus Carls en, whi ch looks b ett er than th emain mov e. It's 1 3 ... �c4! .

This looks v ery logi cal: 1 . Bla ck trad es offa pi ece whi ch h elps him to eliminat e th e cramp ed living quart ers his pi eces had to endur eb efor eth emov e. 2 . Trading bishops w eak ens c4 for Whit e. 3. Th e bishop on e6 blo ck ed th e e7-pawn . By swapping, Bla ck pr epar es ... e6, fr eeing his kingsid epi eces . Som evariations: a ) 14 �e3 �xf 1 15 .:th xf 1li'l c4 16 �d4 e6 17 b 3 (if 17 f41lik e 17 ...g S! wh en Bla ck gains count erplay ) 17 ... 0- 0- 0! 18 l:tfd l l:txd4 (a for ced but pow erful positional exchang e sa c) 19 .l:txd4li'l e3+ 2 0 'Wtb 2 lt'l xg 2 and Bla ck has good comp ensation for th e exchang e in th e form of a pawn and a grip on th e dark squar es, D .Sv etushkin- A .Motyl ev, Istanbul 2 003. At this point infiltration by Whit e is an opti cal illusion . For exampl e, 2 1 .:tad l �cs 2 2 l:.d7 ltf8 ( Bla ck thr eat ens ...li'lf4-g6 xes) 2 3li'l e2 g S! and I would tak e Bla ck any day ov er Whit eh er e. b ) 14 �xc4li'l xc4 15 e6!? (oth erwis e Bla ck d ev elops smoothly ) 1 S .. f. xe6 16 b 3li'ld6 17 eS li'lf7 18 l:te1 g S! 19li'l e4 b6 2 0li'ld 2 'Wtd7 2 1li'l c4 'Wt c7 2 2 �a 3 cs 2 3 .:tad l �g7 24 �cl .:tad8, D .B er cz es- M .Carls en, H eraklion 2 002 . This kid just s eems to hav e th e gift of knowing ex a ctly wh er e to pla ce his pi eces at exa ctly th e right tim e. Bla ck is about to play .J:t . d s and Whit ehas v ery littl e comp ensation for his missing pawn . R eturning to 1 3 .. f. 6: 14ll b1!

116

6 ttJ es

R efusing to h elp Bla ck d ev elop by trading on f6. 14 ...l2J d7?1 Bla ck insists and tri es to for ce White to captur eon f6. This mov e may b eov erly cuteand Bla ck would b e b etter off taking th e mor e straightforward route: 14...f xe5 15 b4 l2J c4 16 i.xc4 ..ixc4 17 b xa5 o-o-o 18 J:td 1.U xd 1 19 ltJ xd l e6 2 0 l2J e3 ..ia6 2 1 l2Jg4 ..id6 2 2 ..ib 2 and White r etains only a tiny edg ein th e ending, F.Vall ejo Pons- G.Kasparov, Linar es 2 003. 15 b41 As usual Topalov tak es th e bold road and sa cs a pawn, rath er than oblig e Bla ck with th e lam e 15 exf6? exf6 wh en Bla ck has a v ery ni ce gam e du e to th e qu eensid e hol es on b4 and cs. 15 ...l2J xes 16 bxa s ..ic8 Bla ck mustund ev elop sin ce 16... 0- 0- 0?? would b ea ruinous d ecision aft er 17 a6. 17 a6 bxa6 18 a s

Th eposition Topalov envision ed wh en h e sa crifi ced th epawn. L et's ass ess: 11 7

Th e Sla v: M o ve by M o ve 1. Bla ck is p erilously b ehind in d ev elopm ent, with dark-squar ed bishop and h8-rook badly out of th ea ction. 2. Whit eowns th eop en b-fil e, and has his sights on pawn targ ets at a6 and c6. 3. b6 is a jui cy o ccupation squar efor Whit e's knight or rook. Con clusion: Whit e has mor e than enough strat egi c comp ensation for his pawn and Bla ck has y et to equaliz e. 18 ... tt:'l d7 1

Question: Why would h er etr eat? Answer: Thr ee r easons: 1. On d7 th e knight cov ers k ey w eak points in Bla ck's position, lik e cs and b6. 2. Bla ck mak es room for ... e s whi ch tak es his fair shar e of th e centr e and aims to d e v elop his kingsid epi eces. 3. Bla ck's knight was unstabl eon es and was vuln erabl eto f4 at any giv en tim e. 19 tt:'l a41 es 20 i.c4 i.cs?l Too ambitious; c7 is th e b est spot for th e bishop to h elp cov er th e num erous w eak qu eensid e squar es. Bla ck n eeds to go into full grov el mod e with 2 0... i.d6 2 11::td 1 W e7 2 2 i.e3 �b8 2 3 tt:'lb6 ( B. Tadi c- M.Savi c, Kragu j eva c 2 01 0), and now 2 3... .l:td8 24 tt:'l xc8+ !Ib xc8 25 llb7 l:te7 wh en Whit er etains pr essur ebut Bla ck's position is not t erminal just y et.

Exercise: Should Whit egrab th ebishop pair and tak eon c s, or continu ed ev eloping with 2 1 lld 1?

21 lld111 Answer: A sho cking exhibition in d epth of und erstanding. Wh en I first saw this gam e I was stunn ed that Topa didn't grab th e bishop pair and th e dark squar es, whi ch is som e thing tangibl e; aft er 2 1 tt:'l xcs tt:'l xcs 2 2 l:tb6 it's a position wh er e Whit e eith er wins or 118

6 !Des draws. Topa,as w eall know,is an all-or-nothing ch ess play er and corr ectly go es for a blow out inst ead by r etaining his knight. Th er e is a J erry Gar cia song about th e Topalov philoso phy whi ch go es: "P ea ch es in th esumm ertim e, appl es in th efall. fI I can't g et th egirlllov e, I won't hav enon eat all " ! Topalov's 2 1 1:td 1 ! ! is a r emarkably d eep mov e. Som ehow h e saw that a bla ck bishop on d4 do es nothing to h elp Bla ck. From this point on, Whit e's position g ets b ett er and b ett er ea ch mov ewith ruthl ess pr ecision. Rybka s cr eams out for 2 1 ti::J xcs, y et Topa's mov e is strong er. Don't b eli ev e it wh en th ey t ell you ma chin es ar e b ett er than w e ar e. Th er e r emain a f ew humans who, through a c cessing that myst erious for ce call intuition, ar e capabl e of p en etrating a position d eep er than th e strong est ma chin es. Our main troubl e is w e t end to hang pi eces from tim e to tim ewhil ema chin es n ev er do- ev en in morning rounds ! 2 1 ... .id4 22 .ia3 cs 2 3 l:tb3 Pr eparing to rul eth eb-fil e. 23 ... h 5 24 l:tdb11j;; e7 2 5 .id s l:ta7 26 l:tb61 Man, this guy is g en erous with mat erial. Topalov, lik e an inv ert ed Robin Hood, st eals from th epoor (hims elf ) to giv eto th eri ch (all his oppon ents ).

Exercise (multiple choice): Which mov eputs up th e ma ximum r esistan ce for Black?a ) 26... ltl xb6; b ) 26...h4;c ) 26.. Jic7

26 ...l:tc7? Answer: Wang Vu e could hav e put up a b ett er fight if h e had a ccept ed th e gift. Topalov r ecomm end ed th e lin e 26... ti::J xb6 ! 27 a xb6 litd7 28 .ixcs+! .ixcs 29ltl xcs llxd s 30 exd s i.f S+ 31ltl e4 l:tb8 3 21j;; c3 .ixe4 3 3 f xe41j;;d6 341j;; c4. tI 's not as simpl e as it looks for Whit e to win this on e sin ce h e has probl ems crossing his king ov er to a s without dropping his b pawn.

119

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 27 l:te6+ 'it>d8 28lt:l b61lt:l xb6 28 .. Jla7 29lt:l xc8 is also hop el ess for Bla ck who ev entually drops th e w eakling pawn on a6 . 29 axb6 l:.b7 30 l:.d6+ 'it>e7 3 1 .Uc6 :d7 3 1 ... l:tb8 do esn't h elp: 3 2 b7 .i.d7 33 l:txa6 . 3 2 l:te6+ 'it>f7 3 3 b71 1-0 33 b7 .i.xb7 34 l:ld6 +wins a pi ece. Summary

I am not a big fan of th em eek d ef ensiv eposition Bla ck g ets aft er 1 3 .. f. 6 and urg e you to try th emor eadv enturous Carls en id ea 1 3 ... .i.c4 ,! whi ch looks lik ean improv em ent . Game15

B.Tadic-B.Bogosavljevic

Cetinje 2010 1lt:l f3lt:l f6 2 c4 c6 3 d4 d s 4lt:l c3 dxc4 5 a4 .i. fs 6lt:l eslt:l bd7 1 ltJxc4 ltJb6 8lt:l es a s 9 f3 lt:l fd7 10lt:l xd7

Th emain lin e,as oppos ed to 1 0 e4 play ed by Topalov last gam e. 10 ...lt:l xd7! Oth er r ecaptur es ar einf erior: a ) 1 0 ... .i.xd7? ! ( I would rath er end up on g6 than d7, wh er e th e bishop g ets shut out o f th e gam e for a whil e) 1 1 e4 e6 1 2 .i.e3 .i.b4 1 3 .i.e2 0- 0 14 0- 0 "ike7 15lt:la 2 .i.d6 16 "ikb 3 .i.c7 17 .Ua c1 .U.ab8 18 .l:.fd 1 lt:l c8 19 ltJ C3. D . Navara-A l. edg er, British L eagu e 2 005. Bla ck stands passiv ely and many of his pi eces sit on th ewrong squar es . b ) Th e probl em with 1 0 ... 1Wxd7? ! is that Bla ck's knight is l eft unprot ect ed on b6, a fa ct that Whit e may us e to his advantag e with eith er "ikb 3 or .i.e3 and a w ell tim ed d5. For ex120

6lU e s ampl e, 1 1 e4 .ig6 1 2 .ie3 e6 1 3 d S ! lUeS 14 d xe6 ..xd l+ 151hd 1 f xe6 16 .ic4 .if7? ( 16 ... es 17 .ie6 isn't v ery pl easant for Bla ck but had to b e play ed ) 17lUb S ! .ib4 + (th e knight can't b e tou ch ed ) 18 �e2 o-o 19lU c7 won a cl ean pawn in Nguy en Anh Dung- Chan P eng Kong, Ho Chi Minh City 2 003. 11 e4 .ig6 12 .ie2 This mov emay b e White's b estoption .H e has four oth er tri es in this position: a ) 1 2 .ie3 �6 1 3 •d 2 e s .!

This temporary pawn sa cassur es Bla ck a good position . 14 d xe s .ics 15 .ixcs ..xe s was E .Bar eev- S . Rubl evsky, Khanty Mansiysk 2 005 . Now Bar eev saw nothing b etter than r eturn ing th e pawn with 16 ..d6 . H e undoubtedly f ear ed Bla ck's initiativ e if h e hung onto th e pawn with 16 f4? ! o-o-o ! 17 .id 3 :h e8 18 • e2 f6 . b ) 1 2 � 3 e s ! (on ce again this magi cmov e giv es Bla ck a v ery pl easantposition ) 1 3 d xe s .ib4 was R .Ru ck- A . B eliavsky, L eipzig 2 002 . fI White g ets ambitious with 14 f4? i t is m et rud ely by 14 ... tU cs r egaining th epawn with initiativ e. c) 1 2 d S pr e- empts ... e s. but... 1 2 ... e s ! ( Why not? Bla ck plays his fr eeing br eak anyway .) 1 3 .ie3 .ib4 14 d xc6 b xc6 15 .ic4 0- 0 16 0- 0 • e7 17 ..e2 :ab8 18 :fd 1 .ics and Bla ck en joy ed good play down th eb-fil e, J .Grun enwald- R H . ubn er, Swiss L eagu e 1994 . d ) 1 2 f4 ? ! is not so bad . White is si ck and tir ed of Bla ck tossing in ... e s ! so this tim e h e m eans busin ess . H e pr ev ents ... es and thr eatens f s. winning a pi ece. Th e probl em is White's last mov e loos ens his pawn centr e. A .B eliavsky- P .A cs, Paks 2 004, continu ed 1 2 ... e6 1 3 .ic4lUf6 14 e slU e4 15 0- 0 .ib4 16lU e2 0- 0 17 .ie3 • e7 wh en Bla ck's a ctiv e pi eces and th epawn targ eton d4 mad eup for White's spa ce. 12 ... es1

121


Question: sI Bla ck fr eeing his gam eor is h eviolating a prin cipl e by op ening th eposition wh en b ehind in d ev elopm ent? Answer: Bla ck is cl early fr eeing his gam e. n I fa ct, h eisn't ev en b ehind in d ev elopm ent ! Th er e is no n eed to tak e th e solid/passiv e rout e with 1 2... e6 1 3 o-o il.b4 14 iLe3 0- 0 15 'it'b 3 "ii c7 16 l:ta c1, as play ed in V. Akobian-A. Wo jtki ewi cz, Las V egas 2 006. Bla ck has y et to equaliz e h er e sin ce h e has not a chi ev ed a fr eeing pawn br eak. 13 dxes il. cs Question: Why play su ch gam es and mak eit a sa c? Wouldn't it b eprud ent to regain our lost pawn with 1 3... lD xe s? Answer: W e would lik e to r ecaptur e th e pawn, but w e must b e vigilant against Whit e's thr eats. R ecapturing th e pawn los es a pi ece to 14 f4 ! lDd7 15 f s. 14 f4 Thr eat ening to trap and smoth er Bla ck's bishop on g6. 14 JWb6! ..

122

6 t'Des

Question: What th e.. .!? You just admonish ed m efor dropping a pi ece earli er in th eanalysis, but h er e Bla ck drops th esam epi ece to th esam etrap and you award th emov ean exclam ! What is th e d eal? Answer: This tim e Bla ck didn't drop th e pi ece, h e sa crifi ced it ! A small shift in th e posi tion can turn what was on ce a blund er into a sa c just a f ew mov es lat er. Also, tak ea look at th e alt ernativ e. Do you lik e Bla ck's gam e aft er d ef ending Whit e's "thr eat" with 14...h6? 15 i.g4 !? 'I m not crazy about Bla ck's chan ces in th e ending aft er 15... 'ii'h4 + 16 g 3 'ik e7 17 'ik xd7 + 'ik xd7 18 i.xd7 + '>t>xd7 19 g4 .! 1 51U1 !? Whit eg ets n ervous and r esists th et emptation. Aft er 15f5 0- 0- 0! his position will not b e easy to d ef end. Question: Can you ba ck up this sa cwith a con cr et e lin e to prov ethat it's sound? Answer: Not r eally. This is an exampl e of an intuitiv e sa c. I can just t ell you my gut f eel ing is that matt ers ar enot going to b e so simpl efor Whit ein th e coming mov es. Question: Gut f eeling ? ! You would sa ca pi ecebased on a f eeling? Answer: Absolut ely ! Do you r eally b eli ev e Tal compl et ely work ed out all his sa cs? H e would just g et an intuitiv e f eeling about a sa c, cross his fing ers and plung e joyfully into th egr eat unknown. Question:How can I improv e my intuition about playing su ch sa cs? Answer: Through faith ! Just mak eth esa cwh en you g et th eright f eel, and pray !

1 23


Question: On e mor ething. Don't you s eeany irony in a r egist er ed chi ck en lik eyou l ecturing to us about th e virtu es of making sp eculativ esa cs? Answer: W ell, I con ced e you got m e th er e. I lov e th e truth -it's thos e damn ed fa cts trip ping m e up whi ch I don't lik e so mu ch ! n I my d ef en ce, I quot e King Louis X V I , known as l e Roi Sol eil (th e Sun King), who on ce r emind ed his sub j ects wh en h e was corn er ed in a simi lar argum ent: "Do as I say, not as I do " ! 15 ... .tg11? H e insists on sa c'ing and plung es into th egr eat abyss of th eunknown. This tim e it's no t so bad to k eep th e pi ece with 15... 0- 0- 0 16 'i'c2 h6, as Bla ck's d ev elopm ent l ead giv es him solid comp ensation for th epawn. 16 f5 Whit eis through playing gam es and bags th epi ece.

Exercise: Should Bla ck go for th egrab and snat ch on h 2, or in cr eas e his alr eady dang erous d ev elopm ent l ead and castl e qu eensid e?

16 .. 0-0-0? Answer: On eof th edang ers of continually in cr easing th e compli cations is th epossibility of th e compli cator g etting mor e confus ed than th e compli cat ee. To sav e you tim e from googling it, y es, I did in fa ct just mak eup thos ewords. Bla ck should first play 16... .txh 2 ,! whi ch: 1. Thr eat ens a nasty ch eck on g 3, and th e e s-pawn; 2. Pi cks up anoth er pawn for th epi ece; and 3. Cov ers against .tf4. 17 .tf4 .

1 24

6 tDes Cov ering h 2. 11 ...tD cs 17... ..txf5 l eads to a m ess, probably in Whit e's favour aft er 18 tiJd5 ! cxd5 19 :c1 + 'it>b8 2 0 e6 + 'it>a8 2 1 exf5 f xe6 2 2 f xe6 tiJf6 2 3 ..tc7 'ii'a7 24 ..txd8l:l xd8 25 'ii'b 3 ..txh 2. 18 'ii'c 2 ..th s !

Exercise (multiple choice}: Should Whit etryt o win Bla ck's h5-bishop, ortryto count eratta ck? Th e choi ces are: a ) 19 � xh5, winning th ebishop; b ) 19 g4,trapping th ebishop; or c) 19lbd s, count eratta cking .

Answer: 19 lbds ! Att empts to trap or win th e bishop allow Bla ck shots on d 3: a ) 19 ..txh5?? lbd 3+ 2 0 'it>e2 lbxf4 + 2 11hf4 'ii'e 3+ 2 2 Wf 1 'ii'xf4 + 2 3 'it>xg 1 :d 2 and Whit e must giv eup his qu een . b ) Aft er 19 g4? ! g5 ! 2 0 ..tg 3 ..txg4 ! 2 1 :xg 1 lbd 3+ 2 2 'it>f 1 ..th 3+ 2 3 :g 2 'We3 chaos still r eigns a cross th eboard and it's cl ear Bla ck's sto ck just w ent up. 19 ... cxd s 20 ..txh s 'it>b8 21 :a3? losing th e thr ead of th e gam e. I t was cru cial to hang on to th e initiativ e with 2 1 :xg 1 lbb 3 2 2 e6 + 'it>a8 2 3 'it>f 1 tiJxa 1 24 'ii'C7 with compli cations favouring Whit e. 21 ... dxe4 22 e6+ Whit edo esn't hav e us eful alt ernativ es: a ) 2 2 :xg l? tiJd 3 + 2 3 'it>f 1lt.J xf4 wins . b ) 2 2 ..te2 .l:tc8 ! 2 3 'ii'b 1 ..td4 24 e6 + 'it>a8 25 exf7 ..txb 21 eav es Bla ck in control . 22 ...'it>a8 2 3 ..te2 ..td4?! Whit eis bust ed aft erth e simpl e 2 3 .. f. xe6 . 24 ..tbs?

125


Th e for ce of th e fir e hos e is so pow erful that it flips from th e grip of th e fir e-fight er's hands. Tadi cmiss es a chan ce to claw his way ba ck into th e gam e with 24 exf7 Ithf8 25 i.c4 tt:'ld 3+ 26 i.xd 3 exd 3 27 lhd 3. 24 ...fxe6 Now Whit e's position is in ruins and h e is down a pawn to boot. Things only g et wors e from this point on. 2 5 i.gs l:tc8 26 'ii'd 1 .i. xb2 I t ea ch a nin e-y ear-old, J erry, who no matt er how mu ch I b eg, r efus es to ev er r esign and always plays all his loss es out to mat e. Som ehow I admir e this no surr end er/fight-to-th e d eath attitud e ! Cl early Tadi c, lik e J erry, is a m emb er of th e bitt er end er club and plays on for quit e som e tim e b efor e hanging it up. Okay th en, en joy th e r est of th e gam e. I will b e l eaving now b ecaus e it do esn't r equir e an annotator or Nostradamus to for es ee th e futur e h er e. 27 l:ta2 i.c3+ 28 �e2 exfs 29 l:tc2 tt:'l e6 30 i.e3 i.d4 3 1 i.d2 i.cs 32 i.c3 i.b4 3 3 i.es .l:!.cs 34 l:txcs 'ir'xcs 3 5 .l:bfs .Ud8 36 'ii' b 1 tt:'l d4+ o-1 Summary

Dr eaming is no substitut e for doing ! fI you f eel in your bon es that it is tim e for you to sa c, th en clos e your ey es, don't chi ck en out, and jump in and sa c. rI on out th ed etails lat er. Game16

B.Gelfand-Wang Vue

FIDE Grand Prix, Sochi 2008 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 tt:'l c3 tt:'l f6 4 tt:'l f3 dxc4 5 a4 i.fs 6 tt:'l es tt:'l bd7 7 tt:'l xc4 tt:'l b6 8 tt:'l es a s 9 g3 A logi cal alt ernativ e to 9 f 3. Whit e plays it Catalan styl e with his bishop b earing down on th elong diagonal, as w ell as th e k ey e4-squar e. 126

6 liJ e 5

Against 9 e3, b e awar e of Whit e's int ention, whi ch is a qui ck g 2-g4 . H er e 9 ... e6 1 0 g4 ii.g6 1 1 h4 ..td6 1 2 h S ..te4 l eads to compli cations that look v ery playabl e for Bla ck, M .M ch edlishvili- I .Sokolov, Villarrobl edo (rapid ) 2 007 . You can also avoid th e adv entur e and g et a d ecent position with th esimpl e9 ...h6, giving th e bishop a saf e hav en on h7 . 9 ..tg s is anoth er id ea, to l eav e op en f 3/ e4 possibiliti es as w ell as g 3 id eas . Aft er 9 ...h6 ! 1 0 ii.h4 e6 1 1 e4 ..th7 1 2 f 3 ..te7 1 3 ..tf 2 o-o 14 ii. e2 liJfd7 15 liJd 3,as play ed in a f ew gam es, Whit e's extra central spa ce giv es him an edg e and Bla ck should organiz e an ... e s br eak at som epoint . I pr ef er 1 0 ... liJbd S ,! whi ch rush es to o ccupy b4 b efor e Whit e plays e4 . 9 e6 Th emain lin eand th esaf est option . N ext gam ew e look at th eriski er 9 ... liJfd7 !? . 10 ..tg2 ..tb4 Bla ck o ccupi es his h er editary hol e on b4 and cr eat es th e thr eat of ... ..txc3 lat er on, should Whit eplay for e4 . 11 0-0 ...

127


Question: I hav ean id ea in this position. How about playing 1 1...lt:lbd5 to eliminateth eknight on c3? This would w eak en Whit e's grip on th e e4-squar e. Answer: Th e plan is logi cal but contains a ta cti cal flaw. Whit e th en plays th e for cing s e qu en ce 1 2 e4 !lt:\ xc3 1 3 b xc3 i.xc3 14 exf5 ! i.xa 1 15 f xe6 f xe6 16 i.e3 i.c3 17 'i'b 3 i.b4 18 i.xc6 +! and Whit e wins. Som etim es a plan, though app earing logi cal, is simply r efut ed by th emath in th eposition. 11 .. 0-0 12 e3 Th e most common mov e. Whit eis in no rush to play e4 and is cont ent to build his posi tion with 'ii'e 2 and l:td 1 first. Th er ear ea coupl eof oth er possibiliti es h er e: a ) 1 2 i.g s (a common mov e in Catalans; Whit e eliminat es a d ef end er of e4 for th epri ce of th e bishop pair ) 1 2...h6 1 3 i.xf6 'ii'xf6 14lt:la 2 i.d6 15 'iib 3 'ii'd8 16 e4 i.h7 17 :fd 1 .l:tb8 18lt:\ c1 i.e7 19lt:\ e2 lt:ld7, R.Vaganian- F.Handk e, Dr esd en Olympiad 2 007. Whit e's spa ce and Bla ck's bishop pair balan ce ea ch oth er out, b ) 1 2 .l:l e1? ! tri es to enfor ce e4 without giving up th e bishops, but 1 2...lt:\ e4 ! short cir cuits th e plan and giv es Bla ck equality or mor e: 1 3 i.xe4 i.xe4 14 e3 (th e point of Bla ck's tri ck is s een if Whit eatt empts to grab mat erial; aft er 14lt:\ xe4?? i.xe1 15 'ii'x e1 'ii'xd4 Bla ck r egains th e pi ece and em erg es up an exchang e) 14...f6 15lt:ld 3 i.g6, S.Ernst- Bu Xiangzhi, Ottawa 2 007. Th ew eak en ed light squar es in Whit e's camp count for mor ethan his spa ce. 12 ...h6 Atsom epoint Whit ewill advan cewith e4, so Bla ck mak es room for th ebishop on h7. 13 'ii'e 2 Continuing with his plan of :d 1 and th en d eciding wh eth er h ewants to play e4 or not. 13 ... i.h 7 Or th eimm ediat e 1 3...lt:lfd7 14 e4 .i.h7. Whit emay hav ea tiny edg e aft er 1 Slt:ld 3. 14 l:td1 .

128

6 ti:J e s 14 ti:J fd7 Th e corr ect knight, whi ch l eav es th eoth er on eto k eep surv eillan ceov er c4. Bla ck can avoid moving a knight to d7 with 14.. .'ii' e7 pr eparing ... l:td8. B. G elfand V. vI an chuk, Pragu e 2 002, continu ed 15 e4 %:tfd8 16 .i.f4 l:ta c8 17 ti:Jd 3. P erhaps h er e Bla ck can try th e ambitious 17... 1:txd4 !? 18 .i.e3 e s 19 f4 li xd 3 2 0 l:i. xd 3 ti:Jbd7 2 1 f S ti:J cs ! 2 2 .i.xcs .i.xcs+. Bla ck's pawn, bishop pair and dark-squar e control provid e mor e than enough for th e exchang e. 15 ti:J d3 'ii'e 71 Th er eis no n eed to mov eth e bishop,as 16 ti:J xb4?simply drops a pawn to 16...a xb4. 16 e4 .•.

16 ... es! At long last, Bla ck hits ba ck in th e centr ewith this corr ectly tim ed br eak.

Question: Why not play ... cs inst ead? ----

Answer: 16... cs? ! isn't as good sin ce Bla ck hands ov er control of b S to Whit e, who stands a bit b ett er aft er 17 ti:Jb s cxd4 18 ti:J xd4. Question:How am I suppos ed to 'know wh en to play su ch br eaks? Answer:You build up a f eel for th e corr ect timing of su ch br eaks by playing th e Slav and also studying excell ent books on th e Slav lik e this on e ! But r eally, th es e things tak e tim e. You can't rush exp eri en ceor intuition, and th elong er you play th e Slav,th eb ett er your f eel for su ch br eaks. 17 ti:J xes Whit ehas a chan cefor an edg ealso aft er 17 d s .:fd8 18 .i.e3 .i.xc3 ( 18... ti:J c4 could b ean improv em ent ) 19 b xc3 cxd s 2 0 exd s ti:J c4 ( 2 0... l:i.a c8 2 1 d6 ! is probably also b ett er for Whit e) 2 1 .i.xh6 ! g xh6 2 2 'ii'g4 + with gr eat compli cations whi ch l ean in Whit e's favour, V.Kramnik- N. Short, Novgorod 1994. 1 29

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve fI Whit e wants to tak e on e s, th en 17 d xe s might b e mor e a ccurat e. 17... lDxes 18 lDxes 'iix es transpos es to th en ext not ewithout allowing Bla ck th epossibility of 18... i.cs. 17 ...lDxes 18 dxes i.cs!

An aggr essiv e n ew mov e in th e position. Bla ck t emporarily sa crifi ces a pawn to try to s eiz e control ov er k ey central dark squar es. Aft er th e saf er 18... 'iix es 19 i.e3 i.cs 2 0 f4 'iie7 2 1 i.xcs 'iix cs+ 2 2 'iif 2 'iixf 2 + 2 3 'ot> xf 2 .l:tfd8 24 i.f l, as play ed in S. Halkias-U. Atakisi, Warsaw 2 005, Whit e holds a tiny edg e in th e ending for a coupl eof r easons: 1. His mor emobil epawn ma jority; and 2. A centraliz ed king r eady to h elp out. Ev en so, it is doubtful that h e can a ccumulat e enough advantag es to s cor e th e full point. 19 i.e3 !? G elfand is not int er est ed in k eeping th e pawn and chall eng es Bla ck's grip on th e dark squar es.

Question: Why was Bla ck's 18th mov ea pawn sac? tI looks lik e h e can win it ba ck aft er 19 ..tf4lDd7. Answer: n I a s ens e you ar e right. Ev en aft er 19 i.f4, Whit e won't b e abl e to hang on to th e pawn for ev er. Bla ck just n eeds to b e car eful about r egaining it without allowing ta cti cal tri cks lik e 19... lDd7? 2 0 i.xh6 ,! and if 2 0...g xh6 th en 2 1 'iig4 + doubl e atta cks d7 and g8 r egaining th epi ece with int er est. 19 ... i.xe3 20 'iix e3 lDc4 21 'iie 2 lDxes 22 f4 lDd7 2 3 .:.d4 This is a v ery common pawn stru ctur e from Slav positions wh er e Bla ck su ccessfully a chi ev es his ... e s pawn br eak.

13 0

6lL:J e s

Question: Who stands b ett er? Answer:l et's ass ess: 1. W e hav e opposit e-wing pawn ma joriti es. Whit e's looks mor e mobil e and th er efor e mor edang erous. 2. Whit e controls mor espa ce. 3. Bla ck controls k ey dark squar es lik e b4 and cs. H e also has pot ential to lat er pi ck on Whit e's slightly w eak qu eensid epawns. 4. Bla ck is r eady to chall eng e Whit eon th e d-fil e. s. Bla ck's bishop on h7 is som ewhat buri ed for th emom ent, but should Whit eg et ambi tious and ev er play e s, th en th e h7-bishop transforms into a pow erful pi ece. Also, Bla ck may soon carry out th er ed eploym ent ...f6 ! int ending ... �g6 and ... �f7 to dir ect th ebishop's gaz eto Whit e's w eak en ed qu eensid e. Con clusion: Th e gam e is probably ev en, and th e play er with th e b ett er f eel in su ch stru ctur es will hav eth e edg e. 23 l:tfd8 24!t ad1lL:J cs 2 5 'it' e3 l:.xd4 26 l:txd4 Whit e's control ov er th e d-fil e do esn't m ean mu ch aft er 26 'it' xd4 f6, sin ce th e infiltra tion squar e d7 is s ecur ely cov er ed. Bla ck will r egroup n ext with ... �g6 and ... �f7, aiming th ebishop at Whit e's w eak en ed qu eensid e. 26 lL:J b3 27 l:td11l e8 •••

•••

131


Exercise: Shoul d White grab morespa ce with 28 e s or shoul d h ehol d ba ck?

2B es? Answer: Un justifi ed ambition is oft en th e moth er of d ef eat. G elfand may hav e b eli ev ed h e stoo d b etter h er e and los es his ob j ectivity . With his last mov e h e giv es away many k ey lightsquar es, mostimportantly c2 for Bla ck's bishop later on . 28 Jii'c s! Bla ck can only exploit White's slightly w eak en ed qu eensi d e effectiv ely if qu eens com e offth eboard . 29 'iixcs ltJxcs 30 .i. f1 e3 i.b3 41 'it>d4 i.xa4 42 'it>cs

This was what G elfand had in mind to sav e hims elf wh en h e sa crifi ced th e pawn . tI looks lik e th e whit e king is th e only adult on th e playground, with no on e t elling him what to do .

Question: What do you m ean "sav ehims elf'? tI looks to m elik e Whit eis just plain winning . Th eb7- and c6-pawns ar e fi xed on th ewrong colour and Whit e's king will pi ck offat l east on eo f th e qu eensid epawns . sI n't it Bla ck who n eeds saving h er e? 42 ... i.b3! Answer: Th e position is an opti cal illusion . Bla ck may ind eed los e his extra pawn but wh en things cl ear up h e g ets a d ecisiv e 2- 1 qu eensid epawn ma jority . 43 i.e4 tI may hav e b een at this point wh er e th e r ealization dawn ed on G elfand that his in t end ed king raid 4 3 'it>b6 a4 44 'it>xb7??fails to 44 ... cswith no good d ef en ceto ... c4 and ... c3, whi ch in turn cr eat es a d eadly and unstoppabl epass ed a-pawn for Bla ck . 43 ... a4 44 h4 44 g4 g s ! 45f s i.d 1 46 h 3 'it>e s 47 i.d 3 h s48g xh s i.xh s49 'it>b6 i.f 3 ! so 'it>a s i.g 2 wins for Bla ck . 44 ... i.d1 H e k eeps an ey e on his a4-pawn whil e cov ering against g4, whi ch would a ctivat e Whit e's kingsid e pawn ma jority . This position must hav e b een frustrating for G elfand . tI 's as if rI oquois brav es manag ed to br ea ch th e s ettl ers' d ef en ce, only to find that th er e is no body hom ein th e compound .

134

6 tiJ es

Exercise: Without moving th epi eces, tryto visualiz e this 12-ply, singl e-string lin e (you can do it l ): 4 5 �b6? �e6 1 46 �xb 7 c s 4 7 �c6 c4 48 �b s a 3 149 b xa 3 c3 so a4 c2. Congratulations if you hav e th e ability to visualiz e th e position cl early to this point. Bla ck, aft er winning Whit e's bishop, will simply sa c his bishop for Whit e's pass ed a-pawn andmop up all of Whit e's unprot ect ed pawns on th eoth er wing with his king. 45 'it>d6 h s 46 .id3 46 'it>cs W e6 47 .id 3 .if 348 'it>b6 'it>d s49 .ic2 cs ? ! so 'it>xb7 'it>c4 +5 1 'it>c7 'it>b4 5 2 'it>d6 C4 wouldb eth esam eoldstory,with Bla ck winning.

Exercise: Finda plan for Bla ck to mak e progr ess aft er 46 �d3. Answer: 46 ... .if3 1 135

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve This d eceptiv ely simpl e and strong mov e allows Bla ck to mobiliz e his qu eensid e pawn ma jority . Th ek ey id ea is that h e can play ...b s without hanging his c-pawn . 47 �cs bs 48 �c2 �e6 49 �g6

Exercise: What is th e corr ect plan for Bla ck to win th egam e? 49 ...�d71 Answer: G et th eking to a sto a ctivat eth equ eensid epawn ma jority . so �c2 �c7 51 b3?1 Sp eeding up his loss but it didn't matt er . Whit e los es anyway aft er 5 1 �g6 �b7 52 �c2 �a6 53 �g6 �a s 54 �c2 b4 55 �c4 �d5+56 �cs a 3 . S1 ... a3?1 A minor bl emish in an oth erwis e flawl ess ending . Wang Vu e miss es th e probl em-lik e shot 5 1 ... �d 1 ! ! that ends all r esistan ce. 52 �b1 �e41

13 6

6 t:D es 5 3 �a2 'itd7 54 'itb4 Th er e is no wiggl e room for Whit e. Bla ck qu eens first aft er 54 'itd4 �d5 55 'ite5 g6 56 'itf6 c5 57 'itxg6 c4 58 b4 c3 .! 54 ... 'ite6 0-1 Whit ehas no answ er to th eking walk to g4 follow ed by th e massa cr eof his kingsid e. Summary

This gam e is a good exampl e of how to push for th e full point in th e endgam e, simply bas ed on th e long-t erm cons equ en ces of th e slight w eak ening Whit e mak es with a 2-a4 on his fifth mov e ! Game1 7

H.Wang-F.Caruana

Reykjavi k 2008 1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 lDf6 4 0Jc3 dxc4 s a4 �fs 6 0Jes t:Dbd7

Question: I hav enoti ced that both Kramn fk and Anand d ef end ed th e Bla ck sid eof 6... e6 7 f 3 cS 8 e4 against Topalov in World Championship mat ch es. Can you explain mor eabout th elin e?

__.

_ _

Answer: Absolut ely not ! tI is a totally thankl ess lin e from Bla ck's p ersp ectiv e. Bla ck go es into full grov el mod eand d ef ends for th en ext 80mov es or so, hoping to bag th edraw ! This lin e s cor es a h ealthy 59% in Whit e's favour, so Bla ck's attra ction to th e lin e r emains an un solv ed myst ery in th e ch ess world. Lu ckily for th e r ead er, th e editor and th e author, w e won't b e cov ering this lin e in this book. n I fa ct, l et's n ev er sp eak of it again. I call this a win, win, win situation ! 7 lDxc4 0Jb6 8 0Jes a s 9 g3 0Jfd7!?

13 7

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve Caution: Wh en you play this lin e as Bla ck you rid e th e dragon, and it's possibl e you may not lik eth epla ces it tak es you ! 10 tt:Jxd7

Question: This s eems a bit obliging on Whit e's part. Shoul dh er etr eat th eknight to d 3 inst ead ? Answer:You ar e corr ect in pointing out that it is in Whit e's b est int er est to avoid trad es, sin ce h e controls mor espa ce. How ev er, r etr eating with 1 0 tbd 3? ! is too slow in this position and allows Bla ck a promising pawn sa c: 1 0... e5 ! 1 1 tt:Jxe5 ( 1 1 d xe5 tt:Jc5 ! also giv es Bla ck mor e than enough comp ensation for th e pawn in th e form of a hug e d ev elopm ent l ead ) 1 1... tt:Jxe5 1 2 d xe5 'ii'xd 1 + 1 3 tt:Jxd 1 ..ib4 + 14 tt:Jc3 ..ic2 ! 15 ..id 2 tt:Jc4 and Whit e found him s elf struggling in T. Baumstark- D. Sv etushkin, Ditzing en 2 009. 10 ...'ii'x d7 11 e4 1 1 ..ig 2 do esn't mak e s ens e if Bla ck is r eady for ... ..ih 3: 1 1... ..ih 3 1 2 ..ixh 3 'ii'xh 3 1 3 'ii'b 3 �a6 14 d5 e6 ! 15 d xe6 'ii'x e6 16 'ii'x e6 +f xe6 with equality, T. Rahman -M. Hasan, Dhaka 2 007. 11 ... ..ih3 12 ..ixh 3 Question: Do esn't this mov e just giv e Bla ck a helping hand in infiltrating Whit e's kingsid e? 12 ...'ii'x h3 13 'ii' b 3 l:ta6

Answer:Y es, Whit egav e Bla ck's qu een an invitation to pok earound th ekingsid e. n I r etu rn, Bla ck's qu een has b een distra ct ed from prot ection of th e b6-knight and also b7 - a fair ex chang e. Bla ck looks lik e h e is contorting a bit, but r eally th er e's no harm don e y et to his posi tion. Similarly, Bla ck's qu een isn't abl e to do mu ch damag e on th e oth er sid e of th e board. Som etim es w ehav eto endur ea t emporary unpl easantn ess in ord er to g et what w ewant. 14 ..if41 This mov e, Aronian's inv ention, may b e Whit e's b est shot to try to squ eez e som ething 13 8

6 tt:J es from th eposition . Whit e's gam e fizzl es aft er 14 �e3 e6 . For exampl e: a ) 15 o-o-o �b4 16 d5 exd5 17 exd5 o-o 18 d xc6 b xc6 and Bla ck has th e saf er king, A . Flumbort- R .Tis chbi er ek, G erman L eagu e 2 007 . b ) 15 d5 �b4 16 d xe6 'ii'x e6 was equal in Z.Gyim esi- Bu Xiangzhi, G erman L eagu e 2 007 . 14 ... e6 15 �es!

15 ...�b41 Bla ck pr ef ers to sa c, avoiding th e lin e 15 .. f. 6 !? 16 �c7 �b4 17 0- 0- 0 0- 0 18 lt:Je2 ! g5 (to pr ev ent lt:Jf4 ). Rybka t ells m e it's ev en h er e and I don't b eli ev ea word h e/sh e/it t ells m e. My intuition says Whit e stands b ett er du eto: 1 . A pow erful pawn centr e; 2 . Th esaf er king; 3. A targ et on e6 and th epossibility of pawn br eaks with d5 or f4; and 4 . Bla ck's qu eensid epi eces ar e contort ed . 16 �xg7 �g8 17 �es 'if'g2 18 o-o-o

139

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 18 ...i.xc3

Question: Bla ck just gav e up bishop for knight. I assum e 1 8. ..'ii'xf 2 is not a good mov e? Answer: Corr ect. Bla ck should avoid th esui cidal 18.. :Wxf 2?b ecaus eit op ens th ef-fil efor Whit e's atta ck and do es nothing to put a d ent in Whit e's pawn centr e. Whit e's e4-pawn is a far mor eimportant pawn to eliminat e,sin ceit giv es ris eto ... llJd s possibiliti es. 19 bxc31 A n ew mov e in th e position, and a good on e. tI 's pr etty s cary that w e ar e still within th eor eti cal grounds on th e 19th mov e. W el com eto th e comput er/m ega-databas e era ! Wang Hao's choi ce looks lik e an improv em ent ov er 19 'it' xc3 'ii'x e4 2 0 :h el 'it'd s 2 1 b 3 'it'd7 2 2 'W'c2 with a v ery diffi cult position to evaluat e, L. Aronian- M. Carls en, Elista 2 007. With 19b xc 3 ! Whit e ensur es that Bla ck's knight n ev er r ests easy on d s sin ce c3- c4 is always in th eair. 19 .. .'ii'xe4 20 c41 Not falling for th elittl estrat egi ctrap 2 0 i.c7? ! 'ii'd s ! wh en Bla ck improv es his position. 20 ...'ii'e 2 21 csl 2 1 :d 3 llJxa4 ! l eads to a draw aft er 2 2 'iixb7 ( 2 2 litd 2 is m et by 2 2... ltb6 2 3 'ii'xa4 'ir'e4 !) 2 2.. :ir'xd 3 2 3 'W'c8+ 'i;e7 24 'iib7 +.

Exercise (multiple choice}: Bla ck's knight is atta ck ed. What should h edo? a ) 2 1 ... llJd S;b ) 2 1 ... llJc4; c) 2 1.. . 'W'c4 +

21 ...lDd S? Answer: This natural mov e los es, as do es 2 1.. .llJc4?? 2 2 lith e1 'ii'xf 2 2 3 'ii'x c4. Bla ck has to try 2 1.. :it'c4 + ! wh en his position r emains diffi cult aft er 2 2 'ii'x c4 llJxc4 2 3 i.f4. Bla ck's loos e knight on c4 b ecom es a big probl em for him, and aft er 2 3 ..b s 24 'i;c2 ! f6 25 :d 3 'i;f7 26 140

6 ttJ es a xb s cxb s 27 !:tb 1 es 28 1:txb5 ! exf4 29 'ot>b 3 tiJd6 30 cxd6 a4 + 3 1 'ot>a 3 Whit e should proba bly still win, but with som ediffi culty . 22 1:tde1! Pr es erving th eoth er rook for f lin cas e Bla ck grabs on f 2 . 22 .. JWh s 2 2 ... 'it' xf 2?? 2 3 lithf 1 'it' xh 2 24 'it' xb7 simultan eously hits a6 and f7 . 2 3 'it'xb7 tlJb4 24 �d6 'it'g5+ 2 5 f4 'it'd8

Exercise (combination alert}: Work out a for ced win fo r Whit e. ( Big hint: it's not v ery subtl e ! )

Answer: 26 :xe6+! An upp er cut whi ch brings th egam eto an abrupt end . 26 ...fxe6 27 'it'xh7 1-0 Aft er 27 .. J:tf8 28 'it'g6 +! 'ot>d7 29 'it'g7 + ! 'ot> c8 30 1Wxf8 ! Whit e's savings a ccount go es up by thr eefull pawns . Summary

fI you pok e th e horn et's n est and play 9 ... ttJfd7 ? ! (inst ead of th e saf er 9 ... e6 ) you had b ett er b eh eavily arm ed th eor eti cally . Th epositions whi ch follow ar enot condu civ eto winging it . Game18

Y.Shulman-C.Lakdawala

Koltanowski Memorial, San Francisco 2000 My fri end,th elat e Tony Mi les,and Ihad mu ch in common:

141

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 1. W e w er e both ch ess play ers with chroni c ba ck conditions. R em emb er th e pi ctur e o f Tony in ch ess magazin es, on th e hospital gurn ey wh en h e play ed in Tilburg lying down? 2. Many in th e ch ess world r egard ed us both as slightly crazy ! I on ce r ead an a rti cl e in th e New York Timesby Gail Collins call ed "Th e S% do ctrin e". Sh e claim ed at any giv en tim eabo ut S% o fth e population ar e just a bit offth eir ro ck ers-not compl et ely insan e, but just consid er ed v ery odd /eccentri c by so ci etal standards. I think Tony felt w e w er e both in th e bottom (or is it top?) fiv e p er centil e o fth e population in this r egard. I r espond ed by t elling him tha t w e w er enot crazy at all. n I st ead, w eboth suffer ed from an in curabl eaffli ction-th eon ethat par ents dr ead th e most in th eir childr en:th ea rtisti cg en ewhi ch I con ced ed,mimi cs crazy ! 3. W e both lik ed th e 6... tLla6 lin e of th e Slav and would o ften analys e th e positions to g eth er ov er th e IC C. 1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3 tLlf3 tLlf6 4 tLlc3 dxc4 5 a4 ..tfs 6 ttJes tLla6!?

Th e starting position o f th e lin e I call "Tony's Big Adv entur e". Bla ck wast es no tim e in o ccupying b4 with a knight rath er than his bishop. 7 e3! Th eonly mov eto play for th eadvantag e. Many o fmy oppon ents hav eplay ed th et empting but dubious lin e7 f3? ,! whi ch w e con sid er in Gam e 2 0.

Question: Can Whit e t rya gam bit to g et a d ev elopm ent l ead with 7 e4? Answer: L et's look. A fter 7 .. ttJxe4 8 ..txc4 e6 Whit e can r egain th e pawn at a high cost with 9 ..txa6 b xa6 wh en 1 0 ttJxc6? fails to 1 0... ttJxc3 ! 1 1 b xc3 'ii'd S pi cking offth e g-pawn, or 9 tLlxc6 b xc6 1 0 ..txa6 'ii'b6 1 1 'ii'e 2 ..tb4 and Bla ck tak es ov er th e initiativ e. If inst ead Whit e continu es to d ev elop with 9 0- 0 I just don't buy that h e has comp ensation. 7 tLlb4 .

...

Question: What will Whit edo a bout Bla ck's thr eat to fork on c2?

14 2

6 tiJ es 8 .ixc4! Answer: g I nor eit ! Mat eon f7 tak es pr eced en ce:

8

e6 L et's all try to avoid 8... tiJc2 +??9 'ir'xc2 ! .ixc2 1 0 .ixf7 mat e. 9 0-0 This position is th er eason that Slav sour ces say 6... tiJa6 is a dubious lin e. How ev er, aft er Bla ck's n ext mov e it looks fully a cceptabl e. Aft er about a w eek of analysis I convin ced Tony Mil es that it was playabl e and h e b egan using it in his own gam es. tI 's always a grati fying f eeling wh en you su ccessfully pros elytiz ea fri end ov er to your own r eligion ! 9 .id6! ....

...

This is an old dis card ed id ea whi ch I hop eto r eviv e. 9... .id6 adds pr essur e to th e knight and supports a f ew possibiliti es: 1. ... 'iie7 or, mor e lik ely, ... 'ir'b8 to stay offth e c-fil eand Whit e's rook on c1. 2. ... cs, aft er whi ch Whit e can't tak edu eto his hanging knight on e s. 143

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 3 . ... lL\d7,to add furth er pr essur eto es. 4 . I n som e cas es w e may just chop th e knight with our bishop, although this is not v ery common . 9 ... ..te7 is also possibl e but I don't mu ch lik e th e passiv e positions Bla ck g ets aft er 1 0 f 3 ..tc2 !? 1 1 'ife2 0- 0 1 2 lL\a 2 lL\xa 2 1 3 l:txa 2 ..ig6 14 l:td 1, as play ed in S K . ar jakin-V K . ramnik, Ni ce (rapid ) 2 008. Whit e go t exa ctly what h e want ed: spa ce, with e4 to follow, and th e bishop pair . 10 'ife2 W e cov er 1 0 'iff 3 n ext gam e. 10 h61 ...

My favourit e mov e in th e position . tI is only this mov e, in con jun ction with 9 ... ..id6 ,! whi ch may r eviv e this lin e for Bla ck th eor eti cally . Bla ck pr es erv es his light-squar ed bishop and giv es it a cosy corn er to hid eon h7 . Bla ck has s ev eral alt ernativ es but I don't lik ea singl eon eof th em ! a ) 1 0... ..txes? ! 1 1 d xe s lL\e4 ( 1 1 ...lL\g4?? falls into a trap: 1 2 e4 'ifh4 1 3 h 3 lDxes 14 exf s lL\xc4 15 lL\e4 ! thr eat ens ..ig s trapping Bla ck's qu een, as w ell as Bla ck's loos e knight on c4 ) 1 2 lld 1 'ife7 1 3 f 3 lL\cs 14 e4 ..ig6 15 ..ie3, Zhu Ch en- A .Nimmy, Gibraltar 2 006, with cl ear advantag eto Whit e: 1 . Bla ck's bishop is buri ed on g6 . 2 . Whit ehas th e bishop pair and controls k ey dark squar es . 3 . Bla ck is cramp ed and th e qu eensid epawn ma jority is pr etty m eaningl ess right now . b ) 1 0 ... lL\c2? ! 1 1 .l:ta 2 ? ! lL\d s (if Bla ck had gon e for th e draw with 1 1 ...lL\b4 'I m positiv e Gris chuk would hav e play ed 1 2 l:ta 1 lL\c2 1 3 .l:.b 1 ! and litd 1 and e4 will follow soon er or lat er, with an edg e to Whit e) 1 2 a s ! (giving his rook an extra saf e hav en on a4 ) 1 2 ... 0- 0 1 3 g4 ! ..txes 14 g xf s. Now Bla ck f elt comp ell ed to mak e a dubious sa c with 14 ... ..ixh 2 +, sin ce 14 ... ..ic7 15 ..txd S ! also wins mat erial, but aft er 15 W xh 2 'ifh4 + 16 Wg 2 'ifg S+ 17 Wh 3 ! Bla ck's a tta ck was at a d ead end and th er e was no p erp etual ch eck eith er in A .Gris chuk J .Sriram,Khanty Mansiysk 2 009. 144

6 liJ e s c ) 1 0 ... cs? 1 1 .ib S+ W e7 1 2 e4 ! .ig6 1 3 li:Jxg6 + h xg6 14 e s cxd4 15 l:td 1 ! .ic7 16 exf6 + g xf6 17 g 3 and on ce again Bla ck didn't hav e enough for th e pi ece, V .M en chik- M . Euw e, Hastings 19 3 1 . d ) 1 0 ... 0- 0?? (what ev er you do , don't do this ! ) 1 1 e4 .ig6 ( 1 1 .. . .ixes 1 2 d xe s .ig4 1 3 f 3 'ii'd4 + 14 Wh 1 do esn't h elp Bla ck a bit ) 1 2 li:Jxg6 h xg6 1 3 e s and Bla ck can hang it up sin ce h edrops a pi ecefor only a pawn , A K . insman- B H . alldorsson , Ha fnar fjordur 1997 . e) 1 0 ... li:Jbd s? ! 1 1 f 3 ! li:Jb6 ( 1 1 .. . .ig6 1 2 e4 'ii'b6 1 3 'ii'f 2 ! k eeps control of th e position for Whit e) 1 2 e4 .ig6 1 3 .ib 3 .ixes 14 d xes 'ii'd4 + 15 'ii'e 3 ! 'ii'x es 16 f4 'ik c7 17 f S ! and Bla ck was g etting ki ck ed around in D .Rogo zenko- S .Atalik , Efori e Nord 2 000. 11 e4 .ih7

Question: I s eea pow erful sa cfor Whit ewith 1 2 li:Jxf7 �xf7 1 3 es. sI n't Bla ck g etting crush ed?

--------�

Answer: Not at all . In fa ct , I think Bla ck a ctually stands slightly b ett er aft er 1 3 ... .l:te8 ! 14 l:t.d 1 liJbd S 15 exd6 'ii'xd6 16 g 3 Wg8 17 a s Wh8 18 .ie3 b S 19 a xb6 a xb6 2 0 .:txa8 .:txa8 2 1 liJxd S li:Jxd s, S .Atalik- C .Lakdawala , Int ern et blit z 2 007 . Whit e's bishops don't work all that w ell in su ch stati cstru ctur es . 12 .if4 Shulman r eali zes that his e s-knight could b ecom e a targ et lat er or could b e und er min ed ev entually with a w ell-tim ed ... cs, so h e ba cks up th e knight with his bishop . 12 . . . 0-0 13 .:.ad1 An aggr essiv ed ecision . Su ch a mov er ev eals som ething about Shulman's styl e. H ek eeps his king's rook wh er eit is on f 1 to pr epar ef4 for an atta ck on Bla ck's king . 13 llfd1 would b e a mor e positional approa ch . S .Nikolov -T .Galunov , Vidin 2 009, contin u ed 1 3 ...'ii'c7 14 .l:.a c1 a6 ! 15 .ig 3 c s ? ! ( I wouldn't mak e this br eak this early and would probably opt for 15 ...l:t.a e8) 16 .ib 3 llad8 17 Wh 1 Wh8 18 li:Jxf7 + ? ! 'ii'xf7 19 es. Now inst ead of 19 ... .id 3? ! , Bla ck looks good aft er 19 ... .ic7 ! 2 0 exf6 .ixg 3 2 1 f xg7 + 'ii'xg7 2 2 h xg 3 cxd4 .

145

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 13 ...'ii'c 7 Now that Whit e commits his a 1-rook to d 1, I don't n eed to worry about �c1 as mu ch, so I pla cemy qu een on c7 rath er than th emor e awkward b8-squar e. 14 ..ig3 Pr eparing f4 .

Question:Your position looks bad . Whit e en joys a big spa ce advantag e. What is your comp ensation? 14 ..l:f.ae81 Answer: I admit that Whit e has an edg e du eto his spa ce, but argu ethat Bla ck's position is not n early as bad as it looks . H e has th efollowing pluss es: 1 . A w eakn ess- fr eeposition; 2 . A hol efor a knight on b4; 3. Pot ential for count eratta ck with ... cS; and 4 . Pot ential for count eratta ck with .. f. s lat er on . 15 'it>h1 lL'ld7 Th er ear ea coupl eof oth er plans for Bla ck in this position: a ) Rybka points out th e atonal comput er mov e 1 S ... lL'lfd S ? ! whi ch may a ctually b e worth a try sin ce Bla ck r egains his pi ece aft er 16 exd s exd s 17 ..ib 3 f6 . Th e s econd point of th e mov e is that it cl ears th e way for .. f. 6, evi cting Whit e's priz e knight on es. For exampl e, 16 ..ib 3 f6 ! 17 lL'lg4 lL'lf4 18 'ii'e 3 'ii'b8 with a strang e, y et playabl e, position for Bla ck . b ) 1 S ...a6 plans to hit ba ck in th e centr e with ... cs, and aft er 16 f4 cs 17 ..ib 3 cxd4 18 .Uxd4 b6 19 ..ic4 ..ics 2 0 .l:td 2 'ii'b7 th epr essur eon e4 giv es Bla ck count erplay . 16 f4 'it>hs 11 'ii' h s lL'lf6 18 'ii'f3 lL'lgs How v ery St einitzian ! Bla ck dr eams about .. f. S ! ..

14 6

6 liJ e s

1 9 .tb3 Perhaps White should just surge with 19 fs ! ? f6 20 liJg6+ .txg6 2 1 .txd6 'i1Vxd6 22 fxg 6. At some point Bl ack must find an effective strike in the centre with ... cs, ... e 5 or .. .f5 . 19 ...fs! The time has arrived to fight back in the centre. 20 liJc4 'i1Vb8 20 .. .fxe4! ? 2 1 liJxe4 .txe4 22 'iiVx e4 liJf6 is also playable but I con sidered it risky to give up so many light squares in the vicinity of my king. 21 eS White doesn't get much either after 2 1 liJxd6 'ir'xd6 2 2 e s 'ilfd7 2 3 .te1 liJe7 24 as (in tending liJa4 and liJcs) 24 ... liJeds 2 5 liJxd5 (25 liJa4 may h ave given White a slight edge) 2S ... liJxds 26 .txds cxds. We agreed to a draw at this point in E.Yanayt-C. Lakdawala South ern Californian Ch ., Los Angeles 2006. 21 ... .tc7 22 liJe3 'i1Vc8 23 .tel a s 24 liJa2 liJd s

14 7


Exercise: It is in White's best interest to plug up that hole on dS. But which way: chop with knight or with bishop? Assess the positions arising from each capture.

25 i.xd51? Answer: Both moves are correct but l ead to very different positions. G M Shulman is in a combative mood. I expected 2 5 tt'lxds cxds 26 tt'lc3 ,.d7 27 tt'lbs tt'le7 28 l:.cl tt'lc6 29 tt:Jxc7 ,.xc7. I am used to such French-style positions. One key factor in Black's favour is that g2g4, White's only real ch ance for an attack, would unleash my dormant light-squared bishop. 25 ... cxd5 26 i.h4! tt'le7 27 i.xe7 He unloads his bad bishop before Black's knight reaches c6. 27 ...llxe1 28 tt'lc3 i.g6 29 tt'lcxd 51?

This is somewh at mean-spirited. Shulman hits me with a cudgel h e finds lying around! I thought I stood at l east equal before thi s move. It turns out Shulman h ad been planning this sac to gain two powerful central passers all along . Question: And now?

------

--------�--

-----

Answer: All hell broke loose and I didn't have a clue if I was winning or losing ! What was worse was that I had to hol d at l east a draw for a shot at an IM norm in thi s tournament. 29 ... exd5 30 tt'lxd 5 l:td7 31 e6 l:td6 3 2 llc1 The point of Shulman's sac. Black must cough up an exchange to ease the pressure. 32 ltc6 33 tt'le7 ,.xe6 34 tt'lxc6 bxc6 35 :tel ,.f7 36 lbc6 •..

148

6 li:J es

Question: Could you assess the situation ? Answer: I will try: 1. The m aterial balance: White has a rook and two pawns for Black's two bishops. Nor m ally a fair deal , but here the black a-pawn hol ds back two white pawns for now. 2. White's d-pawn is passed and if it surges forward Black can g et tied down (a l a Gulko Lakdawala). 3. Black h as two bishops on the open board but right now they don't have stable perches. Conclusion : I prefer Black but m aybe the position is dynamically balanced. 36 ...%ldB 37 d s !? He can also prevent my next move with 3 7 'ii'c 3 ! l:td7 3 8 ds. 3 7 ... ..td6! Heading for b4 where the bishop finds a stable home, blockades White's queenside pawn m ajority and keeps an eye on the blockade square d6. 38 l:te6 ..ths 39 ife3 i.b4?! I h ave noted that many inaccuracies are committed in situations where you are 100% certain your move is the best! I missed a subtlety here. Rybka gives the unnatural, but powerful line 39 ... i.f8 ! (covering g7) 40 'ii'e s ifd7 ! and White can't play 41 11xh 6+? in view of 41...�g 8 42 l::th e6 (42 l:txh s ? ? ifxc6 ! ) 42 ... i.f7 when Black is winning. 40 ifes! A powerful centralizing move, which : 1. Threatens l:txh 6+; 2. Threatens llc7, which hits Black's queen on f7 and also the g7-pawn ; and 3. Adds protection to d6 where he would like to push his pawn. 40 ...� g8

149

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve I can no longer play 40 ... 'ir'd7?? because White wins instantly with 41 ltc7 ! . 41 d6! The Gulko Frankenpawn re-emerges! Stay cal m ! Don't panic! Think happy thoughts !

Exercise: There i s a plan for Black which eliminates that obnoxious d-pawn . Give yourself ten minutes to see if you can fin d it.

Answer: 41 Jii'f 81 42 h 3 Black al so survives 42 lite7 'ir'f6 ! 43 l:tcc7 l:txd6 44 l::t x g7+ '.W8. 42 J:ld7! Threatening to chase the e6-rook away with ... i.f7. This threat forces White's next move which trades the deadly d-pawn for Black's fS-pawn . 43 l::. e 7 .:txe7 44 dxe7 'ili'xe7 ••

••

15 0

6 tb e s

Oh happy days are here agai n ! The much feared pawn reaches the 7th, only to b e de clared dead on arrival . On the other hand, it turns out I'm alive and feel much better now, thank you. So please unhook the IVs and turn off the morphine drip! 45 l:Ic8+ '>t>h7 46 'ii'xf5+ i.g6 47 'ii'd 5 ..te4 48 'ii'g 8+ 'it>g6 49 'ii'c 4 Yz-Yz

I accepted Shulman's draw offer here. Question: Wasn't that a bit of a cowardly decision on your part? It looks l ike Black stands better. Answer: Well, yes, but I was sick of being FM lakdawala and wanted the IM norm in the worst way. And let's not forget the talent discrepancy between me and my opponent! Black would h ave to take risks to win in variations like 49 ... ..td6 so 'ii'e 2 'it>f6 ! ? (Rybka' s psycho choice, not mine!), which I wasn't prepared to take. Summary

In my opinion (and Tony's), 9 ... ..td6 ! followed by 10 ... h 6 revives a theoretically dubious line into a fully playable weapon for Bl ack. Game19

D.Garcia llundain-A.Miles

Escaldes Zonal 1998 Many of the suggested lines offered in this game are Tony's from our analysis sessions. 1 tiJf3 tiJf6 2 c4 c6 3 tiJc3 d 5 4 d4 dxc4 5 a4 i.f5 6 tiJe5 tiJa6 7 e31 tbb4 8 ..txc4 e6 9 o-o ..td6 10 'ii'f3 !?

151


This sneaky novelty sets a trap for Black and throws Tony completely off guard. "Tony's Big Adventure" quickly turns into Tony's big ordeal ! 10 .i.g6?1 ...

Question: Why give up the bishop pair? Why not throw in ...h 6 to m eet e3-e4 with ... .i.h7 ? ------

Answer: 10 ... h 6 ? ? ignores White's threat: 11 lbxf7 ! Wxf7 12 'iixfs winning. It is very easy to miss a shot like this, especially in the opening where many of us have our guards down and are not expecting a combin ation at this stage of the game. Tony and I looked at thi s position and came up with a couple of possibilities for Bl ack: a) 10 ... .i.c2 ! ? i s an odd move, but is actually favoured by Rybka.

The bishop prevents litd1 and is annoyingly difficult to eject. 11 e4 .i.c7 12 .i.e3 0-0 could be a bit awkward for White. For example:

15 2

6 ttJ e s

a1) 13 �ac1 a6 ! intends to play ... cs next, without allowing any ttJbs complications. This virtually forces White into sac'ing on f7 or playing 1 3 ltJg4. a2) We deemed 13 ttJxf7? to be unsoun d. 13 ... �xf7 14 i.xe6 'it'e8 15 i.xf7+ 'ii'xf7 16 l:tac1 'it'g 6 ! 17 eS liJfdS is strategically lost for White, whose position is riddled with bullet holes on the light squares. a3) 1 3 ltJg4 (White's best try) 1 3 ... liJd7 ! 14 'iih 3 'it>h 8 1 5 f3 fs 16 ltJf2 'iie 7. Rybka thinks Black stands slightly better in this bizarre position. b) We also analysed the strange-looking 10 ... 'it'b8 ! ? 11 e4 i.g6, when ... i.xes is in the air, as well as ... ttJc2. 11 ttJxg6 hxg6 12 h3 i.c7 13 �d1 a s 14 e4! Garcia llundain unleashes a firestorm after this move. 14 ... ttJc2

Exercise: Black threatens the rook in the comer and also White's valuable d-pawn . How shoul d White react?

15 d s ! Answer: The brilliant point: White is willing to give up a rook in order to force this ex plosive central pawn break. 1S .. exd s! 1 5 ... 'iid 6? is fatal for Black after 16 dxe6 'iih 2+ 17 'it>f1 ttJxa1 18 exf7+ 'it>f8 19 ttJe2 ! threatening a decisive 'iia 3+. 16 exd s ttJxa1? Black will come to deeply regret allowing White's lawn-mowing pawn all the way to b7. H e is still all right after 16 ... 'it'd6 ! 17 dxc6 'iih 2+ 18 'it>f1 o-o! 19 l:b1 ! (19 cxb7? :ad8 fa vours Black) 19 ... �ad8 ! threatening ... liJd4! to set up ... 'iih 1 mate. I wouldn't mind taking Black at thi s point. .

153

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 17 dxc6 'ii'e 7 18 cxb7 l:tb8 19 'ii'c 6+ �f8 20 .ie3! A cute tail to his combination . The threat of .ics doesn 't leave Black time to extricate his a1-knight. 2o �g8 21 ttJd s! ttJxd s 22 .ixd s ...

An assessment: 1. The fact Black is up a rook for the moment is a mirage. Black's knight on a1 is trapped, and when White win s the knight he ends up with two pawn s for the exchange. 2. White's b7-pawn, anchored by queen and bishop, has a choke-hold on the position and ties down Black's pieces. 3. White's mon ster bishops roam the open board while Black's rooks m ake a rather un impressive picture. Conclusion : Tony is up the creek without a paddle and the opening stage has been a disaster for him. 22 ltJb3 ...

154

6 ti::J es

Exercise: Garcia llun dain has a winning combin ation at this point, whi ch he missed. Do you see it? Warning: Difficult!

23 ..txb3?! Answer: White is still winning after his chosen m ove; however, he missed an in stant knockout punch with 23 ..txf7+! ! 'ii'xf7 24 l:td7 and now: a) 24 .. .'iWf6 25 'ii'xf6 ! gxf6 26 l:txc7 g5 27 ..ta7. b) 24 .. .'i'f8 25 'ii'x c7 and the threat of ..ta7 puts Black away. 23 ... l:.xb7! Clever defence, which eliminates the killer b7-pawn, but it is just not enough to save Black. 24 ..tcs! ..th2+ 25 'it>xh2 'ii'e s+

Question: Isn't White going to be down an exch ange after thi s shot? Answer: Garcia llundain h ad foreseen Black's last move and h ad a counter trick ready to keep the extra material. 26 f41 'ii'xf4+ 27 g3! No more checks. White gets to h ang on to all his extra m aterial . 27 'ii'b 8 28 ..td6 'ii'a 7 29 ..tcs 'ii' b S 30 l:td8+1 White finds one sweet shot after another. 30 .. .'ibd8 31 'ir'xb7 Garcia llundain, after having navigated the complications like a m aestro, now only needs to endure a few spite checks before putting away his illustrious opponent... 31 .. .'ilkd2+ 32 'ii'g 2 'ii'd 3 33 'ii'd s?? •••

15 5


Exercise: Do you see a trick for Black that both GMs missed in this position?

33 ...1We2+?? "They have eyes but they cannot see ! " A remarkable case of double blindness. Answer: Black h as excellent chances to win after the correct an swer 3 3 ... 1Wxd S ! 34 i.xds l:th s ! 3 5 i.xf7+ �xf7 3 6 i.d4 l:tds 3 7 i.c3 l:tcs. 34 1i'g2?? It isn't often that an annotator gets the delightful job of slamming a pair of GMs with three double question marks in a row. 34 �g l ! would consolidate and win .

Exercise: Black to play and win . This one isn't so hard because there is only one possible shot in the position !

156

6 t:D e s Answer: 34 ....l:.xh 3+! This time the trickster doesn't miss his chance. He pulls off a grand swindle and steal s the game, like a thief who expertly cracks open a high-security safe. 3 5 'it>g 1 35 'it>xh 3 'it'hs m ate would be too horrible for words. 3 S .'ii'e 1+! 0-1 Black win s the queen after 36 'ii'fl ttxg 3+! (or 36 ... .l:th 1+!) 37 'it>h 2 'ii'xfl 40 'it>xg 3 'ii'd 3+, and now the bishop too ! Chess can be so unfair. Sometimes one side can make 90% of the good moves in a game and then lose on one boneheaded blunder. For some psychotic reason Tony was actually proud of this game. I told him his "win" was possibly the product of a diseased mind. I also added that he should burn the score sheet and th at we should never speak of the game agai n ! He simply replied with "©". .•

Summary

10 ... .ic2 and 10 ... 1i'b8 both look like playable answers to White's tricky 10 'ii'f3 idea. Game 20

T.Radjabov-V.Kramnik

Monte Carlo (bli ndfold) 2007 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 lbc3 lbf6 4 lbf3 dxc4 5 a4 ..tfs 6 t:Des t:Da6 7 f3?!

Question: This looks grim for Black! White i s about to play e4 and kick our bishop around. Won't he regain his pawn with a very strong position ? Answer: On the contrary, this line is pure joy for Black. Whenever my opponents play 15 7


this move on me, the music from Beethoven 's 9th, "Ode to Joy", autom atically begins to play in my head. It's a chaotic, tactical line, but one where I believe the complications are clearly tilted in Bl ack's favour. Question: Can White win his pawn back first, ;ind only then play for f3 and e4? Answer: This plan is too slow and White gets into big trouble quickly after 7 ttJxc4? lZ'lb4 and now:

a) 8 lZ'le3 �g6 9 as e6 10 g3 was J.Cuervo-C. lakdawala, Internet blitz 2009. Here I played 10 .. .'ifd7 ? ! planning to win a pawn with .. J!d8, but I missed the much stronger 10 ... lZ'l g 4 ! overloading the defence of c2. b) 8 lZ'la3 "fic7 9 f3 e s 10 e4 �e6 is also quite awful for White. 7 ...lZ'ld7 8 ttJ xc4 White can al so take a more positional route with 8 ttJxd7 �xd7 9 e4, but this is met strongly by 9 ... e s ! . For example: a) 10 dxe s �e6 11 "fixd8+ .l:.xd8 12 �e3 �cs 13 �xes ttJxcs and Black has ch ances to exploit White's weakened queenside, T. Ernst-P.Cramling, Stockholm 2001. b) 10 �xc4 exd4 11 'Wxd4 lZ'lb4 12 "fieS+ �e6 13 o-o "fif6 ! 14 "fixf6 gxf6 1 S �xe6 �cS+ 16 'lt>h 1 fxe6 and Black may even stand a shade better due to his centralized king and strong knight on b4, l. lvanisevic-A.Miles, Szeged 1997. s ... esl Bl ack must react vigorously and accurately to counter the strategic threat of e2-e4. If not for this move, White would be dominating strategically. 9 e4 By far White's most common respon se. He has a couple of shaky alternatives: a) 9 dxe s ? ! 'ifh4+ (believe it or not, some of my blitz opponents have actually resigned here in the mistaken belief that they just hung a piece ! ) 10 g3 'ii'x c4 11 e4 (regaining the

158

6 lLl e 5

piece) 11 ... 'ii'e 6 12 exf5 'Wxe 5+ 13 'We2 lLlb4 14 'it>f2 o-o-o 1 5 'Wxe 5 lLlxe5 16 f4 ..tc5+ 17 'it>g 2 lLled3 , D. Reinderman-C.Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2005. White i s already fighting for his life: 1. Black's pieces crawl through the centre like ants at a picnic. 2 . White's devalued kingside pawn majority leaves him worried about further ex changes. b) 9 lLlxe 5 ? ! lLlxe5 10 dxe5 'ii'x d1+ and now: b1) 11 lLlxd1 lLlb4 12 lLle3 ..te6 13 g 3 ..tc5 14 ..td2 o-o-o 1 5 l:tc1 l:txd2 ! 16 l:txc5 l:txb2 and White was busted in J .Perez-C.Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2005. b2) 11 'it>xd1 0-0-0+ 12 ..td2 ..tc5 13 e4 ..te3 14 lLlb1 lLlc5 gave Black a ferocious initiative for the pawn in T.Schulte-G.Biebinger, G erman League 1999. 9 exd41 10 lLlbsl? Radjabov attempts to confuse matters in this blindfold game. White's landmine-filled alternatives include the following: a) 10 'Wxd4 lLlb4! and now: a1) 11 lLle3 ..te6 12 ..te2 lLlc5 13 'Wxd8+ l:txd8 14 o-o lLlb3 1 5 l:tb1 ..tc5 16 'it>f2 lLlc2 17 lLlcd1 lLld2 18 ..txd2 l:.xd2 19 b4 ..td4 20 l:tc1 ..tc4 2 1 .:e1 ..td3 and White was in a straight jacket, F.Caruana-C.Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2010. ...

Even very strong GMs may get caught off guard with the 6 ... lLla6 line. a2) 11 lLla3 ..te6 12 ..te2 lLlc5 13 'Wxd8+ (if 13 ..te3 ? then 13 ... 'Wa5 ! threaten s ... lLlb3) 13 ... l:txd8 14 ..te3 lLlbd3+ 1 5 ..txd3 lLlxd3+ 16 'it>e2 lLlxb2 17 l:thb1 ..txa3 18 ltxa3 lLlc4 19 l:taa1 b6. Black won a pawn and was on his way to consolidation, " Darnoc" -C. Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2010. b) 10 exf5 ? dxc3 11 'We2+ ..te7 12 lLld6+ 'it>f8 1 3 lLlxb7 'Wb6 ! 14 bxc3 (or 14 'Wxa6 ..th4+ 15 g3 :le8+ 16 'it>d1 'Wb3 mate ! ) 14 ... lLlc7 and White resigned, "A-1" -C. Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2007. What a wonderful thing it i s to rest the brain ! I didn't have to think out a single move in this game. It's all computer analysis. c) 10 lLle2 ..tb4+ 11 ..td2 ..te6 ! 12 'Wb3 (or 12 lLlxd4 ..txc4 13 ..txc4 lLle5 ! with m any hang ing pieces) 12 ... lLldc5 13 'ii'a 2 lLld3+ 0-1, I.Somogyi-C. Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2009. 159


Returning to 10 lLlbS :

10 . . . .tb4+ Question: Why didn't Black accept the piece sac? ---

Answer: White regains his piece after 10 ... cxbs 11 axbs but I'm not so hopeful about his position after 11 ... lL!c7 12 exfs ..tb4+ 13 ..td2 ..txd2+ 14 'ii'x d2 lL!xb s. White doesn't have compensation for the pawn. So 10 ... cxbs isn't bad at all . Kramnik wasn't interested in a pawn . He wanted more and went after the initiative with 10 ... ..tb4+. 11 ..td2

Exercise: White threatens a check on d6 and Black's bishop on fs i s also h anging. How do we deal with these threats?

------

160

-�---

6 tLJ es 11 ... 0-ol Answer: Ignore them ! Black accumulated a scary l ead in development - so he uses it to further intimidate and remind his opponent that he will be doing the attacking in this game. 12 tiJxd4? A bit too greedy. He had to try 12 exf5 cxb5 13 axb5 �xd2+ 14 'ii'x d2 tiJac5 15 lla3 l:te8+ 16 �2 tiJb6 with a worse but playable position for White. 12 ...�xe41

The painful truth : the 7 f3 ? ! line is all fun and games until someone (almost always White) gets hurt ! Remember our chat about intuitive sacs? Well, here is a perfect example of one. In return for the piece, Kramnik g ets to bounce White's king all over the board. That is all he needs to decide to sac. Zero calculation ! 13 �xb4? White should h ave played 13 fxe4 'ii'h 4+ 14 <jo>e2 �c5 15 �e3 l:tfe8 16 tiJd2 l:tad8 but I still hate his position. 13 ... tiJxb4 14 fxe4 'ii' h 4+ 15 <jo>d2 Wxe4 16 <jo>c3 tiJdS+ 17 <jo>b3 tiJcS+ 18 Wa3 .l:tad8 19 'ii'd 2 tiJf4 20 l:td1

1 61


Exercise (multiple choice): Two of the moves win ; one doesn't. Let's see if you can do better than a blindfolded Kramnfk! a) 20 ...bs, giving the c4-knight a good, swift kick; b) 20 ...l£lce6, pinning; c) 20 ...l£lfe6, pinning with the other knight.

------

--------�

20 l£lfe6? Answer: Not this one ! Kramnik gives White some ch ances to squirm after his move. Both 20 ... l£lce6! and 20 ... b s ! are crushing blows which would have put White away in just a few moves. 21 l£lxe6! .:.xd2 22 ltJxcs iie7 2 3 l:txd2 fixeS+ 24 Wa2 �b4 25 �c2 iixa4+ 26 Wb1 •..

White's king looks like that exh austed guy you see returning from work on the 6:00 p.m. commuter train, who finally reaches the comfort of home. Radjabov is still alive due to

162

6 ttJ es

Kramnik's stumble on his 20th move. Still, it's not a pretty picture for White: 1. He is behind in m ateri al, with two minor pieces and a rook for a queen and three pawns. 2. White's king safety i s in question once those queenside pawns begin to m ove up the board. 3. For now White lacks an obvious target. Conclusion : White may still be busted, but a win for Black is no longer trivial . 26. . . bsl 21 tiJ d 2 csl The pawn is immune due to the check on d1. 28 ..ie2 C4 29 .:hc1 'ii' b4 30 ..if3 aS White can do nothing but await the inevitable on the queenside with his king's friends, relatives and well wishers to comfort him during the execution process. 31 �a1 .:d8 32 ttJb1 g6 3 3 tiJa3 'ii'c s 34 �b1 a4 3 5 h 3 l:td3 1 Kramnik h as the position under absolute totalitarian control . White can 't move a mus cle without permission . 36 .:c3 :xc3 3 7 l:l.xc3 'i'fS+ 38 tiJc2

38 ... b4?1 Ready, fire, aim ! This is starting to look more and m ore like a botched execution . Kram nik win s a piece for two pawns but this is possibly premature. Question: Why would you criticize Kramnik for winning a piece? Answer: Because now White enforces a strong blockade and Black's a4-pawn is weak. If Kramnik had been more patient he could: 1. Improve his king's position; 2. Create a passer on the king side; and 3 . Create threats on both wings. It is highly doubtful that White could pull off the balancing act of coordinating his

1 63


pieces to deal with both wings. Remember Lasker's motto? "The threat i s stronger than the execution." 39 ltxc4 b3 40 'it>c1 'ii'g 5+ 41 'it>b1 bxc2+ 42 �xc2 'ii'b 5 The technical stage: Black must create a passer with his kingside pawn m ajority. 43 l:tc3 h5 44 g41

Suddenly White's pieces coordin ate wonderfully in defence. His rook on the third rank is especially annoying: 1. It h alts all ... a3 attempts; 2. It defends his one kingside pawn weakness on h 3 ; and 3 . The rook and bishop worry Black about a gan g-up on the loose a4-pawn. 44 ... h4 Principle: The winning side shoul d retain as m any pawns on the board as possible. 45 �d1 'it>g7 46 �c1 'ii'f1 47 llf3 'ii'g 1 48 lla3 'ii'h 1 49 'it>d2 'ii'd 5+ 50 'it>c1 'ii'c4+ 51 'it>b1 'ii'f1 52 'it>c1 'it>h6 53 llf3 'ii'c4+ 54 1:tc3

1 64

6 tt:J es

The changing of the guard. White defends with great efficiency and progress for Black will not come easy. 54 .. .'i'f4+ 55 �b1 'it'f1 56 �c1 �g5 57 .:.f3 'ii'c4+ 58 �b1 'ii'd 5

59 .:.c3?? Oops! Well it is a blindfold game after all . White can still put up fierce resistance with 59 �Cl. 59 ...'ii'x d1+ 0-1 Summary

7 f3 ? ! , the "Ode to Joy" line, is a dubious but thankfully very popular choice for White. I checked my Internet Chess Club ( ICC ) stats as Black and score 75% against it with m any titled players on the White side. Really, I think I am being very kind awarding it a dubious mark. It probably deserves a full question m ark since White must navigate a tactical mine field in order to stand slightly worse!

1 65

·

C h a pt e r T h r e e

6 l2J h 4

1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 tt:Jf3 tt:Jf6 4 tt:Jc3 dxc4 5 a4 ..tfs 6 tt:Jh4

With 6 tt:Jh4 White attempts to throw us off our Slavic stride and force us into some un familiar positions. There are many respon ses Black has at his disposal . I focused on 6 ... i.d7, my favourite, and probably Black's most aggressive respon se. In many lines White is willing to gambit his c4-pawn . These position s closely resemble the gambit lines in the Moscow Variation of the Semi-Slav. It is your job to differentiate between positions where we do hang on to the extra pawn with ... bs and those where we give the pawn back, aiming for a ... cs break. In many of the positions White retreats back to f3 - th at is three moves to get the knight to f3 ! We took only two moves for our bishop to get to d7. So in many cases we strive to reach a normal position where we are handed the gift tempo ... ..td7. Admittedly, not a powerhouse square for the bishop, but hey, it's free !

16 6

6 liJ h4 Game21

J.Kraai-E.Bareev

World Open, Philadel phia 2009 My friend, G M Jesse Kraai once played on the board next to me at the Far West Open in Reno. Pl aying again st G M Nick de Firmian, I opened with 1 liJf3 cs 2 c3! which prepares 3 d4! The Slav-hating de Firmian sat there for at least 20 minutes, realizing he was mired in a move-down Slav position . We drew the game and Jesse participated in the post-mortem analysis. Later Jesse talked about 2 c 3 ! in a video, dubbing the new line "The Lakdawala Accelerated!" Question: You do realize that GM Kraai was most certainly pokin g fu n at your ridiculous 2 c 3 ? ! (and you) in his video, don't you? Answer: I do now! 1 liJf3 d S 2 d4 lDf6 3 c4 c6 4 lDc3 dxc4 5 a4 i.fs 6 lDh4

I like James Vigus' name for the line: "Knight to the Right". As a former Literature major, I'm a sucker for rhymes. Question: What is the point of thi s m ove if Black doesn't h ave to give White the bishop with ... ..i.g6 or ... e6? When Black moves his bishop, White's knight just dangles on h4. Answer: Here are some of the pros and con s of 6 liJh4: 1. It's a disruptive move which attempts to throw Black out of his comfortable pattern s in the Slav. 2. It's also a risky move since White may later retreat his knight to f3. For the reasons I mentioned above, in essence White may later lose a tempo for this disruption . 16 7


3 . White m ay well be able to keep his knight on h4, backing it up with g2-g 3 . If Black ever attempts his ... es break, the knight m ay swoop into fS. 4. By chasing Black's bishop away, White can then play for e4 in a single shot. So in some lines it m ay be White up a move, not Black! 6 ... i. d7 For the sake of space, we will only be covering this move, my favourite and the most combative, against 6 tbh4. Black h as m any other options. H ere's a brief summary: a) 6 ... e6 is played a lot but I'm not a fan . Why give White exactly what he wants, the bishop pair? 7 tbxfs exfs 8 e 3 .ib4 9 .ixc4 o-o 10 'iVc2 g 6 11 o-o tbbd7 12 f3 was P. Eljanov E.Inarkiev, Elista 2008. White prepares to build in the centre. Black must counter quickly with ... cs or risk g etting overwhelmed by White's centre and bishop pair. b) 6 ... i.c8 7 e3 es 8 i.xc4 exd4 9 exd4 i.e7 10 o-o o-o 11 :tel was M.Carlsen H.Nakamura, London Classic 2009. Thi s is an i solani position with White's knight airlifted to h4 rather than the traditional f3-square. I prefer White. c) With 6 ... i.g4! ? Black won't allow e2-e4 without provoking a few pawn weaknesses first. M.Carl sen-B.Gelfand, Moscow 2006, continued 7 h3 .th s 8 g4 .tg6 9 tbxg 6 hxg6 10 e3 e6 11 .txc4 .tb4. This position is very similar to one out of the ... .tg4 line of the Queen's Gambit Accepted. White's bishop pair and space mean more than Black's solidity and hopes of overextending his opponent. d) 6 ... .tg 6 ? ! is lame for Black, who gives White all he desires: the bishop pair, the e4 ad vance in a single move, and space. After 7 tbxg6 hxg6 8 e4 e6 9 .txc4 .tb4 10 f3 White en joys a clear advantage. e) 6 ... .te6 ? ! . Even a chess quality as noble as greed can be taken too far! Black agrees to tangle himself up, hoping to h ang on to his extra c4-pawn. The problem is this is fake greed. Black can't hang on to the extra pawn and tangles himself up for nothing. After 7 e4 g6 8 tbf3 h 6 (to prevent tbg s) 9 .te2 .tg7 10 .i.e3 tba6 11 tbes White reg ained his lost pawn and retained his space advantage in B.Damljanovic-V.Stamenkov, Struga 2005. 7 e4

168

6 lt:J h 4

The most aggressive move. White i s willing to gambit a pawn i n order to slam down e4 without h aving to wait his turn with e3 first, like the rude customer in line at the grocery store who cuts in front of us. We examine 7 g3 and 7 e3 in l ater games. 7 e6 8 lt:Jf3 Sidestepping ... lt:Jxe4. Next game we examine 8 i.xc4 lt:Jxe4 9 lt:Jxe4 1Vxh4. 8 g3 is also a common move at this point, and 8 ... i.b4 9 i.g2 c S ! leads to huge complications where Black should hold his own. s bs Now the game turns into a real gambit for White. ...

...

Question: What is White's compensation ? Answer: White gets compensation similar to gambit lines from the Moscow Variation of the Semi-Sl av: 1. Development lead; 2. Mon ster centre; 3. Attacking chances; and 4. Black's pieces are somewhat contorted, especially that odd-looking bishop on d7. Re member, though, the bishop got to d7 without loss of tempo for Black. An argument may be made that the bishop is better off on c8 where it may be deployed more effectively on b7 or a6. So the "free" tempo argument is still in flux. 9 i. g s h6 9 .. i.e7 10 es lt:Jds 11 i.xe7 1Vxe7 12 i.e2 o-o 13 o-o as 14 lt:Je4 lt:Ja6 was R. Buhmann A.Shirov, Mainz (rapid) 2005. I realize White has compensation, but I h ave a soft spot in my heart for Black in such Slav pawn-grab situations. .

1 69


10 .ltxf6 Question: Can White try 10 .i.h4! ? Answer: I believe he can . Your idea would b e a theoretical novelty - and possibly a good one. let's look: 10 ... g 5 11 i.g 3 b4 12 lt.Jb1 tt.Jxe4 13 .lte5 and now there are two option s: a) After 1 3 ... l:tg 8 14 .ltxc4 White has full compen sation for his pawn . Black has ragged pawns, his king doesn't look safe anywhere on the board and his pieces are clum sy. b) 13 .. .f6 14 'ii'c 2 fxe5 15 'ii'x e4 and I prefer White in the confusion . 10 ...it'xf6 11 ..ie2 .ltb4 12 o-o o-o 13 'ii'c 2 A mellow move for someone down a pawn . Perhaps he should push more forcefully with 13 e5 'ike7 14 'ikc2 a6 15 'ike4 l:ta7 16 .ltd1 ! l:td8 17 ..ic2 g6 18 'ikf4 ..ixc3 19 bxc3 �g7 20 tt.Jd2 ..ie8, as in A.Greenfeld-E.Bareev, Haifa 2000. Here White's attacking ch ances and grip on the dark squares give him full compen sation for the missing pawn . 13 ... a6 14 �fd1 �a7!

170

6 tb h4

Black's pieces are tangled up on the queenside. Bareev's move hopes to slowly transfer the rook to the centre later on . 15 b3! Breaking up Black's domination of the queenside and opening up lines for White in that region . 1 S ... it.xc3 1? Black wants to keep the pawn, but he gets an edge if he returns it with 1 S ... cxb 3 ! 16 'iix b3 'iie 7 17 axbs cxbs 18 tbxbs l:tb7 19 tDc3 as. Black's bishop pair and passed a-pawn probably mean more than White's impressive pawn centre. 16 'Wxc3 cxb3 17 'Wxb3 !:td8 18 'We3 1 This multi-purpose move: 1. Covers against Black's ... cs break; 2. Eyes Black's loose rook on a7; and 3. Prepares ideas like es, followed by it.d3 and 'iie4, lining up on h7. 18...l1b7 19 es "ike7 20 it.d3 it.e8 21 'iie 4 g6 22 "ike3 Mission accomplished. Black has been induced into compromising the pawn cover around his king. Question: Why did White play his queen to e 3 instead of f4, where it i s closer to Black's king ? Answer: 2 2 'iie 3 is more accurate since i t serves the dual purpose of hitting h 6 and al so inhibiting Black's freeing ... cs pawn break. 22 :.tg7 23 it.e4 ..

Question: It looks like neither side accomplished too much in the past few moves. I s the g am e h eading for a draw? Answer: Equilibrium is sometimes mistaken for peaceful intent. In tense situations like 1 71


this one, the players tack about, giving the impression of a lull in the battle when in fact an eruption is at h and. White h ad a choice of two other plans: a) If White tries for a queenside bind with 2 3 Udcl, Black can break out with 2 3 ... c s ! 24 l:txcs bxa4 although White m anages to keep some compensation for the pawn even here. b) 23 tt:Jd2 ! ? .l:.bd7 24 tt:Jb3 'ii'b 4 2 5 l:tab1 ! ? 'iii'x a4 26 .te2 'ili'a3 27 l:td3 'ili'e7 28 'iii'd 2. White has increased his bind on the dark squares at the high cost of another pawn. 2 3 ... bxa41 24 h41? Risky stuff. Jesse is willing to offer another pawn to soup up his attack on the kingside, but I doubt White generates enough on the kingside to justify this second sac. Black's ad vanced a-pawn turns into a serious threat now. Still, I understand why Jesse didn't settle for 24 l:txa4 cs 2 5 .l:.aa1 l:te7 when Black stands better due to his extra a-pawn. 24 ...:b3 2 5 'iii'f4

Exercise: Black i s up a couple of ragged-looking pawns which look like they m ay soon fall. On top of it, his pieces sulk passively on the back ranks. Find a way to energize his position.

----�

�----

2 s ... cs! Answer: Following the tenets of scripture: Meet a wing attack with a central counter. 26 dxcs :txd1+ 27 l:txd1 a3 28 hS g5 29 'iii'd 2 .:lbs?! Black consolidates after 29 ... .tc6 ! 30 tt:Jd4 .l:tb2 31 .tc2 .te4 3 2 'iii'c 3 .txc2 33 tt:Jxc2 Ubs. 30 .tb1 tt:Jd7 Question: Why didn't Black take on c s ?

�------

Answer: He wanted to cover his vulnerable h7-square, so Black played his knight to d7 in order to meet 'iii'd 3 with ... tt:Jf8. 1 72

6 lD h 4 3 1 c 6 l:td s?l Black should win after 31 ...tt:Jxe s ! 3 2 tt:Jxes l:.xes 33 'ir'c2 (or 33 l:tc1 'ir'c7) 33 ...'ir'cs ! 34 'ir'h 7+ 'ittf6 35 'ir'xh 6+ �e7. 32 liJd41 liJxes

Exercise: Do you see what the players m ay h ave missed? Look carefully, White has a shot.

�------

--------�

33 'ir'c2? Answer: White missed his opportunity to get right back in the game with the unex pected 3 3 lDfS+ ! exfs 34 'ir'xds .ixc6 35 'ir'b3 .ibs, with an unclear position. 33 ...'ir'cs? Another mistake: 33 ... 'ir'f6 ! 34 c7 .id7 and now White can't play 35 c8'ir'? because of 3 S ... .txc8 3 6 'ir'xc8 liJg4! with too m any threats. 34 'ir'h7+1 Boldly rejecting the draw against his higher-rated opponent, which was his after 34 tt:Jxe6+ fxe6 35 'ir'h7+ �f6 3 6 'ir'xh6+ �e7 3 7 'ir'xg S+ 'ittf7 3 8 'ir'f4+. 34 .. .'�f6 35 'ir'xh6+ �e7 36 'ir'xgS+ f6

1 73


Exercise (multiple choice): White win s with one of the following. Which ? a ) 37 W'g 7+; b ) 37 W'e3; c ) 37 W'h4. (Beware, difficult!) --

3 7 'iig 7+? Jesse misses the winning line! The position degenerates into a Lord of the Flies situation where order breaks down and blunders crop up with ease. Answer: White wins after 37 'it'e3 ! , no matter how Black responds: a) 37 ... �xh s 3 8 .Uc1! 'it'xd4 39 'it'xa3+ �7 40 c7 l2Jg4 41 'it'f3 ltcs 42 c8'W. b) 37 ... �xc6 38 h6 �d7 39 h 7 lZ:lf7 40 �e4 :es 41 f4! .Uh s 42 g4! .Uh 6 43 l2Jc6+ wins the queen . 3 7 ... �f7 38 c7?! White fights h arder with 3 8 h6! .Uxd4 39 ltxd4 'it'xd4 40 c7 'it'd1+ 41 �h 2 'ii'c 1 42 h7 'it'xc7 ! 43 'iig 3. In stead, 43 h 8'it'?? runs into 43 ... l2Jg4+! 44 �h 3 l2Jxf2+ 45 �h4 'it'h 2 m ate.

1 74

6 lt:J h 4 38 ...lt:Jf3+l A pretty computer shot! 39 gxf3 After 39 Wfl llxd4 40 llxd4 'ii'c l+ 4 1 'it>e2 lt:Jxd4+ 4 2 'it>d3 e s White's king cannot sur vive. 39 ... l:tg5+ 40 'ii'x gs 'ii'x gS+ 41 'it>f1 'ii'c s 42 h6 'ii'x c7 43 h7 White's last hope is in his advanced h -pawn . 43 ...'ii' h 2 44 lt:Jc6+! Jesse comes very close to pulling off a miracle comeback. Bareev, however, had un doubtedly worked out the hidden win for Black at this point. 44 ...'it>f8 45 l:.d8+ �e8 46 �g6

Question: What just h appened? It looks to me like White, who threatens to take on e8 followed by a check on g8, is winning !

Answer/Exercise: It certainly looks that way. Black h as yet another combin ation up his sleeve. Do you see it? Just look at the remainder of the g am e to see h ow Bareev played it.

46 'it>g7! 47 ltxe8 'it>xg61 0-1 White hangs it up. After 47 ... 'it>xg 6 48 h 8'ii' 'ii'xh 8 49 ltxh 8 a2 we reach a galling situation (see following diagram). White, now up by a rook and knight, watches helplessly as Black promotes his upstart a-pawn . .••

175


Summary

The novelty 10 �h4! m ay be an improvem ent for White. His compensation for the pawn looks similar to what he normally gets in the gambit lines of the Moscow Variation of the Semi-Slav. Game 22 P .Eijanov-A.Gi ri

E uropean Cl u b Cu p, Ohrid 2009 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 lLlf3 lL\f6 4 lLlc3 dxc4 5 a4 �fs 6 lL\h4 �d7 7 e4 e6 8 �xc41?

Question: I see a combination for Black. Doesn't 8 lL\xe41 work? ...

1 76

6 Ci'J h 4 Answer: Yes and no. I t works, and I h ate to tread upon your celebratory mood, but it's not a combination on Black's part; it's a deliberate sac on White's. 8 ... Ci'Jxe4 Taking advantage of White's dangling horse on h4. 9 Ci'Jxe4 'il'xh4 10 'il'f3 1 Preparing .i.f4. The queen also eyes the sac square f6 and may later transfer t o g 3 , where i t hits g 7 and d6. Other weaker tries are: a) 10 Ci'Jg S ? ! .i.e7? ! was G .Forintos-B.Ivanovic, Bar 1977, but instead of 10 ... .i.e7 ? ! Black can take over the initiative with 10 ... .i.b4+ 11 'ifn1 c s ! 12 .i.e3 cxd4 13 g 3 'il'h6 14 'il'xd4 Ci'Jc6 15 'il'e4 'ii'g 6. b) 10 'il'e2 ? ! .i.b4+ 11 'ifn1 h6, C.Duchhardt-A. Koch, G erman League 2003, leaves White much less aggressively placed than in the game continuation . 10 ... .i.b4+ 11 �1 The starting position for the sac.

Question: Does White really have full compensation for a pawn? Answer: Let's assess the plusses for both sides. For Black: 1. He stands a pawn up. 2. His structure is solid, and he owns ds. 3 . White has lost his castling rights, which could leave the h 1-rook out of the game for quite some time. For White: 1. H e has a development l ead. 2. There's a threat of ..tg s trapping the queen. This threat increases his development lead. 3. He dominates on the dark squares and threaten s to infiltrate d6 later on with a piece.

1 77


4. He virtually has a written guarantee of an attack to come on Black's king. Conclusion : Black underestimates White's compensation at his own peril ! We must tread very carefully for the next 10 or 20 moves, or risk punishment of biblical proportions! u . . .fsl?

Attempting to disrupt the smooth flow of White's initiative. 11...h6 is a calmer and possibly better approach . 12 ..tf4 o-o 13 ..tes and now: a) 13 ... cs? (it is remarkably easy to get slaughtered in this line if Black is not on high alert) 14 ti:Jf6+! gxf6 (Black is also in desperate trouble after 14 ... �h 8 15 tt:Jh s f6 16 ti:Jf4!) 15 ..txf6 ..tc6 16 ..txh4 ..txf3 17 gxf3 and White h ad a powerful attack, despite the absence of queens, in D.Doric-B. Esen, Novi Sad 2009. b) 13 .. .fS ! 14 ti:Jg 3 looked fine for Black in V.Borovikov-V.Kupreichik, Pavlograd 2000. 12 tt:Jgs 'ii'x d4 13 'ii' h S+

Exercise: I s 13 ... g 6 forced?

--------�--��

178

6 lb h4

A.Greenfeld-T. Burg, Groningen 2009, instead went 1 3 'ifb3 l2Ja6 ? ! 14 �e3 'ifd6 1 5 �d1 'ife7 16 !2Jxe6 �xe6 17 �xe6 l2Jc7 (17 ... l:.d8 18 �e2 ! also looks very unpleasant for Black) 18 �d7+ �8 19 i.xf5 and Black was struggling. But Rybka insists Black is okay after 13 ... a5 ! . 1 3 �d8! Answer: The force is strong in this one ! Giri comes up with an original defensive idea to run his king over to the queenside through heavy traffic. Having looked at young Anish Giri's games, I can tell you he is a strategic genius - very rare. Prodigies are normally tactics/calculation wizards with kindergarten strategic skills. Giri possesses an innate feel for where his pieces go. H ere he comes up with the radical but strong plan of seeking refuge on the queens ide. ...

Question: Why did he deliberately forfeit his right to castle ? Answer: Black doesn't quite equalize after 13 . . . g 6 1 4 'ife2 o-o 1 5 �xe6+ �xe6 16 !2Jxe6 'ifd5 ! 17 l2Jxf8 ! (if 17 l2Jc7? 'ii'f7 18 l2Jxa8 ? .Ue8 19 �e3 f4 Black gets a ferocious attack) 17 ... �xf8 18 h4! l2Jd7 19 h 5 l2Jf6 20 hxg6 hxg6. Black has a pawn for the exch ange, but White probably stands a shade better. 14 'ife2 ! Question: Can White win the exchange with 14 l2Jf7+? Answer: It wouldn't be wise: 14 ... �c8 1 5 !2Jxh 8 'ifxc4+ 16 �g 1 'ii'c 2 is very strong . 1. Black h as two healthy pawn s for the exch ange. 2. Black m ay unravel soon with ... b6 and ... �b7. 3 . White's rook on h 1 remains unemployed for quite some time. Question: Well then, how about 14 i.xe6? Answer: No good. Black can force a pawn-up ending after 14 ...'ii'd 3+ 1 5 �g 1 g 6 ! . 1 4 �c8 1S l2Jxe6 'ii'e4 1 6 !2Jx g 7 ...

179


Exercise: This is a critical position. H ow will Black develop his queen side ?

16 ...lba61 Answer: Like thi s ! 17 'iix e4 Black is not afraid of: a) 17 .txa6? bxa6 18 'Wxa6+ rJi;c7. His nasty bishops and safer king give him more than enough compensation for the pawn. b) 17 f3 'Wxe2+ 18 <J;; x e2 .td6 and Black is on his way to equality. 17 .. .fxe4 18 lb h s <J;;c 7?1 Black equalizes after 18 ... ttJcs ! 19 h4 (if 19 il.f4?! lbd3 ! and Black takes the initiative) 19 ... <J;; c 7. 19 ttJf6 ..tfs 20 g41

20 .:thf8? Alert: Kinderblunder! He will come to regret h anding over the bishop pair. Black shoul d avoid adventure and play the mundane 20 ... ..tg6 21 ..tf4+ ..td6 22 ..txd6+ 'it>xd6 23 .txa6 bxa6. His active king and pressure on b2 give him equal chances in the end ing. 21 gxfs :xf6 22 .:tg1 .:txfs 2 3 .:tg7+ rJi; b6 White has all the chances after 23 .. .'it>d6 24 ..tg s ! 'it>es 2S .th4 ttJcs 26 .:td1 ! .:tf3 27 .:txh 7 lbd3 28 .tg 3+ 'it>d4 29 .txd3 l:txd3 30 .l:tc1 .:td8 3 1 l:txb7 as 3 2 .tf4. 24 ..te3+ ttJcs? 24 ... ..tcs ? ? 2S as mate i s an unappealing alternative. The only m ove i s 24 ...'it>as. but 2S .l:txb7 i s still good for White. ...

1 80

6 ltJ h4

Exercise: Thi s i s Pompeii, just moments before the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. Find the forcing sequence which win s two pieces for a rook. (Beware, difficult! )

--------�

Answer: 2 5 a 5+1 First, a deflection. 25 .txa 5 26 1:txb7+1 1 Next, a mega deflection with a rook sac! 26 'it>xb7 27 .:txa 5 The point: Black's knight fa11s as we11. 27 ... 'it>b6 28 b4 doesn't he1p B1ack a bit. 27 .:taf8 28 .txc5 •••

.••

•••

28 Jbf2+ ••

1 81


Otherwise it's time to resign. Giri finds the only path to continue the game toward the inevitable. Really, his odds of drawing this game again st a 2700+ rated player are near zero. 29 i.xf2 e3 30 b3 l:txf2+ 31 �g1 1:tc2 32 ltes l:.c3 33 �g2 �b6 34 h4 as 35 ..ltg8 An alert move which takes away Bl ack's threat of ... a4. 35 h6 36 �3 e2+ 37 �xe2 1:th3 38 .U.e4 The game is over. 38 �C5 Another bitter ender. Perhaps G M Giri made a careful study of the collected games of my 9-year-old bitter ender student Jerry! 39 �d2 l:th2+ 40 �c3 llh3+ 41 �b2 .l:th2+ 42 �a3 l:th1 43 ..ltf7 .l:ta1+ 44 �b2 .l:tf1 45 .l:tc4+ �b5 46 i.g6 l:tf2+ 47 �c3 .l:tf3+ 48 ..ltd3 �b6 49 l:tg4 .l:th3 50 �d4 l:th2 51 .tlf4 l:th3 52 l:.e4 .l:.g3 53 hs .l:th3 54 l:tes lth4+ 55 ..lte4 l:th3 56 �c4 :h4 57 .Ue6 l:txh5 58 .U.xc6+ �a7 59 .l:!.c51 1-0 Jerry would disapprove and argue the resignation was premature. •••

•••

Summary

11 ...h 6 m ay improve on Bl ack's play in this game. Don't underestimate this gambit. We probably have to endure a living hell for the extra pawn . Let's all agree not to flinch ! Game 23

T.Nyback-V.Ivanchuk

E uropean Cham pionship, Antalya 2004 1 d4 d5 2 lLlf3 lLlf6 3 c4 c6 4 lLlc3 dxc4 5 a4 ..ltfs 6 lLlh4 ..ltd7 7 g3?! The trouble with this is th at White gets a Catalan where his knight on h4 makes little sense. Black's bishop on d7, on the other hand, is perfectly placed for a Catalan structure. 7 e6 8 i.g2 cs! •••

182

6 ltJ h4

Question: You are kidding, right? Why can't White take the exchange? Answer: Black gets a terrific position if White grabs the exchange with 9 .txb7 .tc6 10 .txa8 .txa8 11 0-0 cxd4, as in "Gail" -C.Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2008. Black has obvious compen sation with the towering bishop along the a8-h 1 diagonal and the rolling central pawns. If White declines the exchange with 9 .txb7 .tc6 10 .txc6+ tiJxc6 11 dxcs 'ii'x d1+ 12 tiJxd1 .txcs, as in "Cortex" -C. Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2005, Black i s ahead in development, has pressure down the b-file and chances to exploit the weakened White queens ide. 9 ds exd s 10 tiJxd s tiJ c6

We reach a Catalan-like position, except: 1. White's knight is offside on h4 and vulnerable to ... .te7; 2. White must deal with that gaping hole on b4; and 3 . If White tries to immediately regain his lost pawn on c4 he falls slightly behind in de velopment. 11 'ii'c 2? The wrong way to go after the pawn . After the stronger 1 1 0-0 tiJxds 12 .txds .te7 13 tiJf3 .tf6 White was only a smidgeon worse due to that hole on b4 in D.Harika-E.Tairova, Heraklion 2004. 11 tiJxd s 12 .txd s liJb4 13 'ii'e4+ .te7 14 .txc4 •••

183


Question: Thi s looks like a blunder. Black h as a bishop skewer on the long diagonal. Wouldn't it h ave been better for White to take on b7? Answer: 14 ..txb7 doesn't get White off the hook: 14 ....l:tb8 (threatening ... .l:txb7 followed by ... ..tc6) 15 o-o 'iib 6 16 ..td5 ltJxd5 17 'it'xd5 ..te6 l eaves Black with bishop pair, light square control and strong pressure down the b-file. To an swer the other part of your question, 14 ... ..tc6 doesn't win the rook on h 1. How ever, your move is good for Black, who has the following startling idea: 1 5 ..tb5 ! (this move is probably why lvanchuk rejected 14 ... ..tc6, but...) 1 5 ... 'ii'd 1+! ! (out of nowhere ! ) 16 'itxd1 o0-0+ (he escapes the pin with check) 17 'ii'd 3 ltJxd3 18 .txc6 ltJb4+ 19 .td2 ltJxc6 20 l2Jf3 ..tf6. In this position White's king is uncomfortably placed and his queenside still needs tending. All well and good, but the line lvanchuk chose in the game is at least as strong as this: 14 0-0I 15 lLlf5 !? White is willing to fall even further behind in development. The alternative is equally depressing: 15 o-o ..tc6 16 'ii'g 4 ..txh4 17 gxh4 h 5 ! 18 'it'xh 5 'ii'd 4! 19 ..tb5 ..txb5 20 axb5 ltJc2 2 1 .l:tb1 .l:tae8 and White h as a miserable position. 1s ... ..txts 16 'iixf s •••

1 84

6 lb h4

Exercise: Black leads in development. What is his best method of exploiting this l ead?

Answer: 16 .. Jii'd 41 Black creates immediate central confrontation. 17 i.. d 3 Question: Why did White give up his g ood bishop? Shouldn't h e try 17 .tb3 ? Answer: White's position deteriorates quickly after 17 ... c4 18 i.. d 1 c3 19 i.. e 3 'ii'f6 ! . 1 7 ...lt:Jxd3+ 1 8 'ii'xd3 'ii' b 4+1 lvanchuk is not satisfied with a superior ending and keeps queens on the board. After 18 ... 'ii'x d3 19 exd3 llad8 20 'lile2 .tf6 Black obviously stands much better, but is this enough to take the full point? That is in question. 19 'litf1 Question: Why not 19 'ii'd 2 instead of 19 �1? -----

Answer: With 19 'litf1 White castles by h and. Loss of castling rights isn't a big deal in this position and he may want to keep his rook on h 1 just in case he can later stir up trouble with h2-h4. 19 'it'd2 would be similar to the game after 19 ... .tf6 20 0-0 lUd8 2 1 'ii'c 2 c4. 19 ... c4 20 'ifc2 .tf6 21 'lilg2 l:tfd8 22 .Ub1

1 85


Exercise (multiple choice): It is obvious that Black has the advantage. Now what? Which i s the best plan for Black? a) 22 ...:ac8, intending ... c3; b) 22 ...ltd7, intending to double rooks; or c) 2 2 ... a6, intending to activate his queenside pawn m ajority.

__.

_ _

Answer: 22 ... a6! Activating his queenside pawn majority is Black's best plan in this position. Exercise (homework assignment): Look up and study the g ame Marshall-Capablanca, New York (matchgam e 23) 1909. In that gam e the players faced a very similar situation, and it's perhaps the greatest example of h ow to utilize a pawn m ajority in all of chess literature. Look at how Capa mopped the floor with Marsh all in the ending and then compare his technique to lvanchuk's. 23 iLe3

Answer: The reason White refuses to return fire is that pushing his own majority is much too slow and it creates holes in White's position. Let's look: 2 3 e4? ! l:td3 24 f4? .l:.ad8 and Black already threatens .. J:td2+. 2 3 ... bs 24 l:thc1 h6 2 5 h4 .:.ac8 26 axbs axbs 27 'ii'e 4 Dreaming about an attack starting with g4 and g s . White may as well try since he has nothing better. If he sits around, Black simply creates a passer on the queens ide and uses it to paralyse White.

18 6

6 liJ h4

27 'ii' b 31 The end of White's attack! lvanchuk threatens to take on b2 with his bishop, followed by ... C3. White has little choice but to retreat. He could try the desperate 28 'ii'fs .ixb2 29 l:tc2, but after 29 ... g 6 ! 30 l:.cxb2 gxfs 31 .l:txb3 cxb3 3 2 l:t.xb3 l:tds 33 .ixh 6 l:tc4 that passed b pawn should eventually cost White his bishop. 28 'ii'c 2 'ii'a 21 Nice! :tal isn't possible. Black clears the path for his queenside pawn s. 29 .id2? This innocent-looking move loses. •.•

Exercise (combination alert): Black to play and win. Capa found a similar shot against Marshall. Do your h omework and carefully study that game. It is well worth the effort.

18 7

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve Answer: 29 c31 The wrecking ball falls on c3. Thi s crushing shot wins m aterial in all lines. 30 i.xc3 30 bxc3 llxd2 wins a piece, while after 30 i.e3 cxb2 31 'iix c8 llxc8 3 2 l:.xc8+ �h 7 White must give up a rook for the b2-pawn . 30 ... b4 3 1 l:.a1 'iid S+ 32 e4 Finally activating his kingside pawn majority! It comes about 15 tempi too late. 32 ...'iie 6 0-1 White can 't squirm out after 33 e5 'iid 5+ 34 �h 2 i.xe 5 35 .Ud1 'iic 5. •••

Summary

The 7 g 3 ? ! line l eads White into an inferior Catalan. Make sure to look up the Marshall Capa game. Please don't m ake me beg ! Game 24

l.lvanisevic-I.Sokolov

Croatian Team Cham pion ship, Sibenik 2008 1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 lDf6 4 lDc3 dxc4 s a4 i.fs 6 ltJh4 White has a couple of inferior alternatives: a) 6 i.g 5 ltJe4! 7 ltJxe4 i.xe4 was S.Bermudez-S.Collins, Bled Olympiad 2002. White found him self in an awkward situation since 8 e3 ?? drops a piece to 8 ... i.xf3 and 9 ... 'iia 5+. b) 6 g3 ltJa6 ! 7 i.g 2 lDb4 8 0-0 i.c2 intending ... i.b3 . White has a h ard time regaining his pawn . If h e is unable or unwilling to regain it, then he lacks full compen sation . 6 ... i. d7 7 e3

White isn't interested in dram as involving risky pawn sacs. He simply regains his pawn. 7 e61 •••

1 88

6 tb h4

The simplest move. Black doesn't take the bait with ... bs, and instead plan s ... c s turning it into a Queen 's Gambit Accepted with the inclusion of Black's bishop on d7 and White's knight on h4. Thi s shoul d be in Black's favour since White will almost certainly retreat the knight at some point to f3 . This will mean Black's ... .id7 is for free. Question: What if Black h an g s on to the pawn with 7 ... bs? Answer: This time Black gets an inferior version of the pawn grab. For example, 8 lt"Jf3 e6 9 lt"Jes as 10 'ii'f3 ! (with latent threats on a8, c6 and f7) 10 ...l:f.a7 11 g4! h 6 12 h4 .ib4 13 i.d2 'ii'e 7 14 gS hxgs 1 5 h xg s l:txh 1 16 'ii'xh 1 lt"Jds. A.Moiseenko-M.Gagunashvili, I stanbul 2003. Now White got a strong attack after 17 g 6, but 17 axb S ! would h ave been even bet ter. 8 .ixc4 8 tbf3 shoul d be answered by 8 ... c s ! . Oscar Wilde claimed that the best way to deal with temptation was to yield to it. In this position he would be wrong. Black should stay clear from the greedy temptation to h ang on to his pawn with ... b s ? ! . After 8 tbf3 c s ! , K.Arkell-C.Lakdawala, Internet blitz 2010. continued 9 lt"Jes ! ? (the idea i s to pick off the bishop pair) 9 . . .lt"Jc6 10 .ixc4 cxd4 11 exd4 .i e 7 12 0-0 0-0 13 tbxd7 'ii'x d7 14 ds lt"Jxds 15 lt"Jxds exds 16 'ii'x ds :adS 17 'ii'x d7 l:lxd7 18 .ie3 a6 19 l:.fd1 l:Ud8 20 l::tx d7 l:lxd7. Black follows up with ... .if6. His development l ead and control over b4 nullifies White's bishop pair. s cs ...

9 0-0 After 9 tbf3 cxd4 10 exd4 lt"Jc6 11 dS?! (White shouldn't play this before he castles) 11...exds 12 lt"Jxds lt"Jxds 13 'ii'x ds .ib4+ 14 .id2 'i'e7+ 15 �1 .ie6 16 'ii'e 4 .ixc4+ 17 'ii'x c4 i.xd2 18 lt"Jxd2 0-0 White found himself seriously behind in development in K.Arkell C.Lakdawal a, Internet blitz 2009. 9 tbc6 10 lt"Jf3 cxd4 11 exd4 .ie7 ...

1 89


Black must rush to complete his development. I tried 11...lt:Jb4? but Black just doesn 't h ave time to establi sh the blockade on ds. Pun ishment followed swiftly: 12 dS ! (Principle: open the position when ahead in development) 12 ... exds 13 lt:Jxds lt:Jfxds 14 �xds lt:Jxds 15 'ifxds �e7 16 lt:Jes ! �e6 17 'in>S+ Wf8 18 'i'xb7 and I found myself down a pawn, S.Shipov-C. Lakdawal a, Internet blitz 2010.

12 ds Question: I noticed White is always rushing to liquidate his i solani in this line. Why not hang on to the i solani and go for an attack? Answer: If White plays a normal isolani position, he stands worse since he h as trouble whipping up an attack. The reason : Bl ack has access to ... lt:Jb4. For example, 12 .:te1 lt:Jb4 1 3 lt:J e s 0-0 1 4 �f4 .l:tc8 1 S l:lc1 lt:JfdS 16 �g 3 �g S ! 17 l:tb1 � c 6 and Black has reached a n ideal anti-isolani setup:

190

6 lD h4

1. dS is firmly blockaded. 2. Black knights sit happily on b4 and ds. 3 . White doesn't have a trace of the traditional attacking options he normally enjoys in queen 's pawn i solani positions. 4. White's queens ide is shakier than in normal isolani positions. Conclusion : The time loss White incurred with lL:Jh4 earlier in the game, added to Black's access to b4, en sures Black gets a favourable isol ani setup. 12 exd s 13 fDxd s lL:Jxd s 14 i. xd s 14 'WxdS 0-0 15 i.e3 i.f6 16 fDd4? (16 %Ud1 i.e6 17 'We4 was better) 16 ... i.xd4! 17 i.xd4 i.e6 18 'ii'xd8 l:taxd8 19 i.xe6 l:txd4 20 i.h 3 l:tb4 left White on the defensive trying to cover his weaknesses on the queenside in K.Arkell-C.lakdawala, Internet blitz 2010. Keith Arkell and I are attempting to break a world record with the number of blitz games testing this line! 14 0-0 15 i. e3 i.f6 16 'ii' b 3 White hopes his tiny development lead m ay come to something. 16 £Da s! 17 'W b4 lL:Jc61 ...

...

...

Question: Is b7 poisoned? I assume there is some kind of queen trap or tactic if White takes it. Answer: b7 isn't poisoned, and indeed, White can take it. However, he g ets nothing at the end of the line 18 'ii'x b7 .Ub8 19 'ii'a 6 fDb4! 20 'Wc4 lL:Jxds 2 1 'Wxds "iic 7 2 2 lUc1 'ilfb7. Black regains his pawn with a good position . 18 'i'f4 'Wb81? 19 'ii'x b8 Question: Shoul dn 't White try to keep queens on the board to whip up an attack? Answer: He can keep queens on with 19 'ii'c4, but after 19 ... fDe7 20 i.e4 i.fs White has neither attack nor pressure.

191

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 19 .:tfxb8 20 ltJ gsl .tea 21 .:tfdll? GMs never seem to defend anything which is attacked! White boldly offers b2 hoping he has enough compensation for the pawn with file pressure and superior piece placement. The best players carry a deep feel for initiative, which they value over material in most cases. look at the players in your chess club. Notice that the m asters tend to sac for initia tive, while the lower-rated players have a tendency to defend any time something is at tacked. .•.

Exercise: Now from our viewpoint: should we grab the pawn or not?

21 ....ixb21 Answer: Why not? It's an ending and it's a pawn ! In thi s particular case, I believe White may have gone too far by offering the b-pawn. I realize h e has practical chances, and you can argue that about 80% of Tal's sacs are refuted by computers. But here, lookin g at the remainder of the game, I just can't find a path for White to fully justify thi s pawn sac. The point is, it is a different m atter to sac a pawn in an ending than it is to sac one in the middl egame. Still, I can't bring myself to give 2 1 l:tfdl a dubious mark because there is, after all, the practical aspect to the game. As Alekhine once said, "Chess is not all logic." 22 l:tab1 .ies 2 3 f4?1 Thrashing about, White misses the correct plan. He should continue with pure piece play with 23 ltJe4!. This forces Black to worry about ltJcs and also keeps Black's bishop out of b4.

1 92

6 tb h4

Exercise: Come up with a clear plan for Black. Find the best m ethod of nullifying White's pressure down the b-file. Answer: 23 ... .t c3! Black's plan i s to set up a blockade on b4, by playing ... .tb4 and ... as. This will defuse White's pressure down the b-file. 24 li:Je4 .tb4 25 fs He hopes to jam the pawn on f6 to worry Bl ack about his back rank some day. Black may be untangling after 2 5 tt:Jcs as 26 .tf3 .txcs 27 .txcs ti:Jd8 28 �al .tc6. 2s ... a s 26 f6 g6 27 .tb6 More accurate was 27 .tf4! �d8 28 i.e? �d7 29 .tb6. 21 ...l:tc8 28 tt:Jcs? White still h as a touch of pressure after 28 �bel.

1 93

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve Exercise (multiple choice}: White's 2 8 lLics ? walks into a small combination. Which m ove shoul d Black play? a) 2 8 ...:ab8; b) 2 8 ... J.xc5+; c) 28 ... J.c3

28 ...l:tab8?1 Answer: Both sides miss 28 ... .Jit.xcS+! 29 .Jit.xcs lLid8 ! , double attacking a4 and the bishop on cs. 29 l:tbc1 White can't put his finger on a good plan or target and begins to chase the wind, hop ing it keeps still . The clock is ticking. White's pieces, infused with only a finite amount of energy, must find a path to cause trouble for Black. The longer he delays in coming up with a good plan, the closer Black comes to consolidation. 29 lLie4 is met with 29 ... lLid8 ! 30 .l:tal i.c6. 29 ... .Jit.a3 Both sides continue to miss the idea 29 ... lLid8 ! threatening to take on cs and clip the a4pawn . 30 l':.b1 lLid81

Finding the right plan is h alf the battle in a chess game. 3 1 lLie4?1 White puts up more resistance with 31 .l:te1 ! .Jit.xcs+ 32 .Jit.xcs .Jit.xa4 33 i.b6 lLic6 34 l:tecl. 3 1 .Jit.xa4 Picking off a second pawn . Black is well on his way to consolidating his advantage. 32 .Jit.b3 3 2 .l:tel .Jit.b4 33 l:te3 :as ! prepares the future march of his a-pawn . 32 ... i.xb3 3 3 l:txb3 .Jit.b4 34 :td7 lLie6 3 5 l:tbd3 .•.

Question: Didn't 3 5 J.a7 win a pawn ?

1 94

6 l'D h 4 Answer: I t wins a pawn but doesn't save the game. After 3 S ... :ta8 3 6 l:txb7 :tc4! 37 l:le3 a4 White simply can't generate enough threats to offset the deadly passed a-pawn . 3 5 ... a41 Reminding his opponent that he h as threats of his own . 36 l'Dd6

Exercise: Find the plan whi ch allows Black the easiest path to consolidation of his two-pawn advantage.

Answer: Remove as m any pieces from the board as possible: 36....ixd61 3 7 ll3xd6 l:Xc61 38 .ie3 llxd6 39 llxd6 White runs out of firepower to generate threats. 39 ... a3 40 .ic1 :as o-1 Summary

Meet 7 e3 with 7 ... e6!, which turns the game into a somewhat favourable version of a Queen 's Gambit Accepted due to White's offside knight on h4.

19 5

C h a pt e r Fo u r

T he Gel ler G a m b it

1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 lt:Jf3 lt:Jf6 4 lt:Jc3 dxc4 5 e4 bs 6 es tt:Jd s

Psychologists tell us that most of our communication is non-verbal . If this is the case then the opponent who plays the Geller Gambit communicates the following: "Prepare to die, Slav lover! " There are three or four paths White can take again st the Sl av to reach an opening edge. The Geller Gambit is not one of them ! Here are three theories about Geller Gambiteers: 1. Opponents who hit you with this gambit most certainly grapple with some deep seated and unresolved anger m an agem ent issues. 2. They do it to get your attention. If you fling a glass at a wall, people take notice. Right out of the starting gate they try to muscle us off the board, like the high school bully who shakes down the other kids for their lunch money. 3. A Geller G ambiteer may be afraid of a positional battle against you and play the gambit in a somewhat desperate bid to create chaos. 196

Th e G e l l e r G a m b i t

Let's not m ake the huge mistake of underestimating this gambit, which is sadly some thing I h ave done on occasion. The opening m ay be bordering on unsound, but it i s also very dangerous. One way to get blown away as Black is to h ave a shaky grasp of theory. An other way to lose i s to improvise at the board. My l ast Slav loss was to thi s h ated gambit when, in a burst of creativity, I conjured up a nonsensical idea and m an aged only to con fuse myself. I learned my lesson. It's best to stick with known theory. Why try to fix some thing that isn't broken ? The first two games of this chapter focus on the old m ain line, 7 a4 e6 8 axb S ? ! , where White trades his a-pawn for Black's b-pawn . I consider this line dubious and close to down right unsound. The superior path for White is to play 8 tt:Jg s ! and leave the pawn ten sion in the queenside (Games 27-28). Then the position is a mess, but at least we h ave our extra pawn to comfort us ! Kasparov said recently that opening gambits are basically unsound in the age of com puters. As an experiment, try the Geller G ambit against Rybka or Fritz, and they will gorge themselves on the pawn and crank out win after win. So we know in our hearts if we de fend well the point should rightfully be ours. Game 25 E.Kahn-LPortisch

H ungarian League 2003 1 d4 d 5 2 tt:Jf3 tt:Jf6 3 c4 c6 4 tt:Jc3 dxc4 5 e4 Theory number four: They all want to rule the universe ! 5 b5 6 e 5 •.•

Question: This advance seem s rather risky for White. Isn't he handing Black control over d S ?

19 7

Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve Answer: Very true. White makes a big concession by giving up dS. But remember, very little in life comes without compromise. In chess, a compromise is usually a contractual agreement where both White and Black acquire what neither side wants ! In the end, though, pushing to es is a good deal for White, who receives m any benefits from the move: 1. The e s-pawn gives White a long-term space advantage. 2. It gives White attacking chances, especially if Black castles kingside. 3. It opens up e4 for White's pieces. I'm not impressed with White's compensation if he avoids the e s advance. For example: a) 6 'it'c2 ? ! (a milquetoast alternative) 6 ... e6 7 g4!? (I apologize for that milquetoast crack ! White goes psycho!) 7 ... i.b7 (maybe Black should take the second pawn, like an all you-can-eat buffet: 7 ... tt::\ x g4! 8 a4 and then immediately return the pawn with 8 ... e5!; Ry bka claims a clear advantage for Black in this complex position) 8 g S tt::\fd7 9 i.d2 tt::\b6 10 h4 tt::\ 8 d7 11 a4 b4 12 as bxc3 13 .txc3 c s ! and Black grabbed the initiative by returning the piece in M. Bosboom-I.Sokolov, Netherlands League 2007. b) 6 a4? ! (this really is milquetoast) 6 ...b4 7 tt::\ a 2 tt::\ x e4 8 tt::\ xb4 'it'as 9 i.d2 tt::\ xd2 10 'it'xd2 e6 11 tt::\ c 2 'ir'xd2+ 12 tt::\ x d2 tt::\ a 6 13 i.xc4 :tb8, P.Savva-L.B.Han sen, Heraklion 2007. Black already stands better here, as he has: 1. The bishop pair; 2. Control over b4; and 3 . Control and pressure down the b-file. 6 tt::\d 5 7 a4 White needs to keep Black rattled and shake things up. I don't like 7 tt::\ g s ! ? which allows Black to go about his business without worry: 7 ... -tfs ! (a good reaction - Black takes advan tage of the lull in the battle to bring his bishop outside the pawn chain since he is worry free on bS) 8 'ir'f3 e6 9 g4? (he h ad to try 9 tt::\ xf7 <J;; xf7 10 g4) 9 ... i.g 6 10 h4? tt::\b4 and White had no good method of defending c2 and d4, M. Duesterwald-C.Lakdawala, San Diego (rapid) 2007. Let's look at the position after 7 a4: ...

198

Th e G e l l e r G a m b i t

Question: Can Black develop h i s bishop t o fs on the outside of his pawn chain ? Answer: Often a battle rages between what we need and what we want. Some good ad vice: Go with what you need! It would be very nice to bring the bishop out to fS before we play ... e6. The reality is that 7 ... i.fS ? ! is simply too slow, although Black sometimes tries it for shock value. 8 axb S ! is a strong reply: a) 8 ... t2Jb4 9 i.xc4! tLlc2+ 10 'itfl ttJxa1 11 bxc6 t2Jxc6 12 ds with a nightmarishly strong attack for the rook, J .Fedorowicz-F.Braga, Germ an league 1989; b) 8 ... t2Jxc 3 ? was the product of my favourite delusion - paranoia. I was surprised by Taylor's choice of the Geller Gambit and, wanting to avoid main lines, came up with a cun ning plan : confuse matters by improvising at the board. The result: only I got confused! After 9 bxc3 cxbs 10 ttJg s ! e6 11 g4! i.g6 12 'ii'f3 tLld7 13 i.g2 litb8 14 lha7 White enjoyed all the benefits of the Geller Gambit without being down a pawn in T.Taylor-C. lakdawala, Southern California State Championship, Century City 2010. 7 . . . e6 8 axbs?!

Question: Am I wrong in thinking thi s i s somewhat bold on your part givin g the m ain book move a dubious m ark? ---

Answer: This is the old school (and in my opinion, inferior) way of pl aying the Geller Gambit. White releases the pawn ten sion for no good reason before playing ttJg s. The move allows Black's bishop to sit pretty on the a8-h 1 diagonal which White conveniently opened for him. Just because a tenet has been followed for a long time doesn't make it cor rect! Question: That is a flawed argument. Doesn't the wisdom of the m ajority usually trump the opinion of a single individual ?

'----

1 99


Answer: Not necessarily. In that case the people who believed the earth was flat in the 12th century (the m ajority) were correct ! I am convinced 8 axb S ? ! isn't a good move and the trend seems to be moving towards thi s belief. We examine the more modern and superior move 8 ttJg s ! , leaving the queenside pawns as they are, in the final two games of this chapter. 8 ...ttJxc3 The only way for Black to hang on to his extra pawn. 9 bxc3 cxbs 10 ttJgs

Threatening 'ii'f3, double attacking aS and f7. 1o ... ..t b7 11 'ii'h s g6 11...'ii'd 7 is al so playable. The idea is to avoid weakening the dark squares by forgoing ... g6. One must be on alert for tricks based on ttJxh7 and ttJf6+ or ttJxf8: a) 12 ttJxh 7 ? ! ttJc6 ! 13 ttJf6+ (after 13 ttJxf8? 'ii'xd4! 14 cxd4 l:txh S Black's connected passed pawns and control over dS give him a winning position) 13 ... gxf6 14 'ii'xh 8 o-o-o! 15 'ii'h 4 (White doesn 't survive 1 5 'ii'xf6?? ttJxd4!) lS .. .fxes with a m assive initiative and attack for the exchange, O.Cayon-G.Kanefsck, Salta 1999. b) 12 ..te2 ! (the correct path : White avoids adventures and continues developing) 12 ...h6 13 ..tf3 ttJc6 14 o-o ttJds 1 5 ttJe4 as 16 'ii'g 4 llh 7 17 ..td1 hs 18 'ii'e 2 ..tds 19 ..tc2 l:th 8 20 ..tg s ttJb7 2 1 f4 and the fs break becomes a serious issue for Black. White's attack gave him more than enough compensation for the pawn in M.lllescas Cordoba-A.Chernin, Pamplona 1991. 12 'ii'g4 The tabiya position of the old m ain line. More and more recent games avoid thi s posi tion and now the trend veers towards 8 ttJg s instead.

200

Th e G e l ler G am b i t

1 2 i.. e 7 The m ain move, but there are alternatives: a) 12 ... h6 13 lZ:le4lZ:ld7 14 i.. e 2 i.. d s 1S o-o 'iWb6 16 i..f3 'ii'c 6 17 lte1 as 18 h4 b4 19 'ii'f4 b3 ! ?, M. Podgaets-V.Arbakov, Krasnoyarsk 1981. I have more faith in those scary queenside passers than I do in White's attack. 20 i.. a 3 i s met with 20 ... a4 2 1 i.. xf8 �xf8 2 2ll:ld6 1:th 7 and I just don 't see anything meaningful for White on the kingside. b) 12 ... i.. d S 13 h4 h6 14lZ:le4lZ:ld7 1S hS gS 16 i..e 2 aS 17 0-0 b4 18 lLld2lZ:lb6 19 f4 bxc3 20ll:lf3 gxf4 21 i.. xf4 f8 doesn't bother Black, whose king wants to head east anyway. 20 ... b4 21 cxb4 lLlxb41 ..•

Question: Why didn 't Black want to take the passers with 21 ... axb4? Answer: Be careful. Black falls into a cheapo if he goes th at route. 22 .txb4! and Black's rook is loose on a8. 22 .txb4 'ifxb4 23 .l:.ab1 'i'd2 1 A multi-purpose move, which : 1. Hits d4; 2. Prepares the advance of the c- and a-pawns; and 3. Allows Black swift kings ide assistance if needed with ... 'ifg s. 202

Th e G e l l er G am b i t

24 llfd1 White can set a trap with 24 l:tfel+ 'it>f8 2 5 l:te7 ! . Here 2 S ... 'it>xe7? falls for the trap, al lowing 26 llb7+ 'it>f8 27 l:txf7+! 'it>xf7 2 8 'ir'd7+ with a perpetual, despite a deficit of two rooks. However, 2 S .. .l:th 7 ! retains the advantage. 24 ... 'ir'gs 25 l:tel+ 'it>fs 26 'ir'd7 'it>g7 2 7 l:tb7 27 :es ? ! fails to 27 ... l:thd8 ! 2 8 'ir'h7 'ii'f4 29 l:txds l:tab8. The weak back rank costs White the game. 21 ...l:thfs 2s h4 'ir'fs l Assessment: 1. Black's king is secure. 2. Black is ready to push his queens ide passers. 3. White's m ajor pieces, on the other hand, can't find a way to generate serious threats and stumble around confused - like friends who have had one too m any, returning home from the bar after it closes at 2 :00 a.m .

203


29 'ii' b s He can't afford to swap. Exercise: Without m oving the pieces, try to visualize the end of the line 29 'iWxfs gxfs 30 :es a4 3 1 :xds a3 32 :b1.a2 33 :a1 :fbs and ... :b1+ follows. 29 ... c3! 30 lies Nor can White stem the flow of the pawn s after 30 l:lc7 l:lfc8 31 .Uee7 llxc7 3 2l:txc7 l:tc8. 30 c2! The pawn is determined to break through the threshold and score. 31 l:lc7 .•.

Exercise: Black's queen and his deeply passed c-pawn are attacked simultaneously. How does Black force the pawn through?

....___

Answer: By ignoring the threat to his queen : 3 1 ...l:tac81 32 .U.xfs l:txc7 0-1 Summary

Out with the old (8 axb s ? ! ) and in with the new (8 ttJg s ! ) !

Game26 E.Magerramov-K.Sakaev

D u ba i 2003 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 tDf3 tiJf6 4 tDc3 dxc4 5 e4 bs 6 es ttJd s 7 a4 e6 8 axbs?l 204


I believe i t was Dickens who wrote o f this move: " It was the best of moves; i t was the worst of moves." I believe the l atter! 8 . .tt:Jxc3 9 bxc3 cxb5 10 tt:Jgs .tb7 11 'ji'h s g6 12 'ji'g4 .te7 13 h4 .

White means business and hopes to block the smooth flow with this disruptive move.

Question: I realize White angles for hs. I can 't decide between ... h6 (and avoiding ... h s all together) or just g etting it over with and playing ... h s . Which one is better? �---

-----

Answer: That is a tough question. The first thing you need to do to m ake such a decision is to look up the stats and see if one scores overwhelmingly better than the other. In our case both score very well for Black, near 70%. Sometimes stats can be deceiving but in thi s case both lines look quite good for Black. Then you research games in both positions and simply pick the line you have the better feel for. In this case, after havin g looked at the games, I feel that 13 ... h 6 leads to crazier positions than the more stable 13 ... h s . I am basi cally a positional player who does better in clearer positions, so my personal choice would lean toward the stabilizing 13 ...h s . 13 ... h 6 Black refuses t o take the strategic bait and play 1 3 . . .h s , which hands over the g s -square to White. Let's follow the game R.Wendt-P.Haba, Bad Worishofen 1992: 14 'ji'g 3 .tds ! (this makes it a lot harder for White to get away with a knight sac on e6) 1 5 .te2 li:Jc6 16 .tf3 b4! 17 li:Je4.

205


Question: Should Black take on c3, or should he play ... b 3 ? Answer: Here and in similar positions, this decision is going t o b e crucial. Taking on c3 begins the process of dissolving White's centre, whereas playing ... b3 is like money in the bank. Black will win almost every ending after ... b3 since he has two deep passers on the a and b-files. However, he must survive the middlegame first in this case! Here Haba chose 17 ... bxc3, and the game continued 18 i.g s c2 19 tbd6+ �f8 20 -.f4 .:.h 7 21 i.e4 i.xg s 22 hxg s i.xe4 23 -.xe4 -.as+! (Ouch ! A cute shot th at wins) 24 l:txas? (24 �e2 was better but still losing for White after 24 ... �6) 24 ... c1-.+ 2 5 �e2 �2+ 26 �fl .:.bs 0-1. Now let's return to the position after 13 ... h6:

14 tbe4 Question: I see a dangerous sac for White. Does 14 tbxe6 work?

206


Answer: You probably shouldn't even analyse a sac like this. Question: Why not? ----·---

Answer: White has only two pieces developed and after the sac, just his queen ! One queen won't do the job. For example, 14 ...'ii'd 7 ! (pinning is even stronger than taking im mediately) 1 5 tt::lg 7+ 'it>f8 16 e6 'ifd5 17 exf7 'it>xg 7 18 h5 g 5 . White's attack i s at a dead end and it should be no surprise with zero development! 14 ...'ii'd 5! Forcing White's next move and denying him the manoeuvre i.e2 and i.f3 later on . 15 f3 a 5 1 16 h 5 g5 17 i.e2

An assessment: 1. Black is up a pawn. 2. White has kingside space and an ominous build-up there - which means little since Black's king stands uncommitted and m ay head the other way! 3 . White's impressive centre is on the verge of collapse should Black play ...b4 and ...bxC3. 4. Black also has the option of ...b4 and ... b3. Not only will thi s ensure endgame victory should he reach th at stage, it also closes the queenside where his king can live in peace and safety. 5. White is a long way from engineering a successful f4 pawn break. Conclusion : White stands busted. 17 tt::\c 6 The most aggressive move. Black is ready for ... b4 and ... bxc3 with threats on d4 to fol low. In the game L.Olsson-N.Pert, Gothenburg 2005, Black tried another plan, taking a more cautious, but no less effective route with 17 ... tt::ld7 18 0-0 b4 19 i.d1 b 3 ! (denying White both i.a4 and i.c2 ideas) 20 i.a3 i.xa3 2 1 lha3 f5 ! (creative play, forcing White to take) 22 •••

20 7


exf6 o-o! (giving notice that it is Black, not White, who i s doing the attacking from this point on) 2 3 l:tel tt:Jxf6 24 tt:Jxf6+ l:txf6 2 5 lte 5 'ii'd 6 26 l:taxa5 l:txa5 27 l:txa5 .td5 and Black's deeply passed b-pawn proved decisive. 18 i.e3

Exercise (multiple choice): Which is Black's most effective plan here? a) 18 ...a4, intending to seal the queen side for king safety with ...tt:Ja5 and ...lLlb3 ; b) 18 ... b4, intending ...bxc3 to dismantle White's centre; or c) 18 ... b4, intending ... b3, ... a4, and ... a3, pushing the passers.

�-----

-------�

18 ... a4?1 Answer: Sakaev's plan is too slow and allows White to drum up counterplay on the f-file. Plan 'c' is the most effective. Black needs to counter White's f-file ambitions by m arch ing his queenside passers forward. For example, 18 ...b4! 19 o-o b 3 ! 20 tt:Jd2 ! a4! 2 1 .txc4 'ii'a 5 22 tt:Je4 b2 23 l:tab l a3 24 .txe6! a2 ! 25 .txa2 'ii'x a2 and Black is favoured in what is admittedly still a very complex situation . 18 ...b4! 19 0-0 bxc3? (Plan 'b') han ds over the initiative to White after 20 tt:Jxc3 'ii'd 8 21 .txc4. Suddenly Black has given back his extra pawn, his king is unsafe no m atter where it goes and White is ready for central action shortly with d4-d5. 19 o-o tt:Ja s 20 l:ta2 tLlb3 2 1 .id1! Plan : .tc2 and f4. Result: Dan gerous counterplay! 21...0-0-0 22 .tc2 Black has achieved everything he wanted since he began his faulty plan on his 18th move. He sealed the queenside and also castled queenside. But now what? Black also sealed off the source of his counterplay - his queenside pawns. White now generates dan gerous threats down the f-file and soon takes over the initiative.

208

Th e G e ller G am b i t

2 2 .. Ji'c6 A head-scratching moment of confusion for Black, who now realizes he needs queen side play quickly. Sakaev plans ...b4. The trouble is, this will expose his king to danger. I in voke this simple prayer to the universe when I find myself in a similar situation in my own games: Please protect me from the consequences of my earlier bad decisions ! 23 f41 The preparations are completed. 23 ... gxf4 24 :xt4 :hg8 25 'ii'f3 The f7-pawn falls. Black doesn't generate compensating counterplay down the g-file. 25 ...'ii'e 8 26 :xt7 b41?

He has to try something or else White picks off pawns on the king side and then m akes an effort to queen his own h-pawn. 27 l:txe71? A bold sac - although I'm not convinced about its strength - which weakens Black on 209


the dark squares and also allows White inroads on the queenside by picking off a4. 27 ... 'ikxe7 28 .l:.xa4 'ii h 4?1 Black doesn't have a firm footing in his attack and soon finds his own king spinning in a whirlpool on the other end of the board. Black m ay still find a way to save himself in the line 28 ... i.c6 29 l:txb4 tt::lx d4 30 i.xd4 l:.xd4 3 111b6 i.xe4 3 2 i.xe4 .l:.d2. 29lbb41 i.ds Black's game disintegrates after 29 ... 'iie 1+? 30 �h2 'ilfh4+ 31 'iWh 3. 30 i.f2 'ike7? Black's last chance was to hope to draw the ending after 30 ... 'iig 4 3 1 tt::ld 6+ .l:.xd6 32 'ikxg4 .l:.xg4 3 3 exd6 .l:.xg 2+ 34 �f1 tt::ld 2+ 35 �e2 �d7. 3 1 'iie 2! Target: c4. 3 1 ...tt::lc 1 If 31 ... 'ikc7? then 32 i.xb3 cxb3 33 'iia 6+ wins. 3 2 'iif 11 tt::ld 3 3 3 i.xd3 cxd3 34 'ikxd3 'iia 7 3 5 c4 i.a8 36 dS It's over. Black's attack comes to an end and White's begins in earnest. 36 ...'iia 1+ 37 .l:.b1 'iix es 38 tt::lc s exd s

Exercise: White forces m ate. Try to work it out to the end .

....____

Answer: 39 'ii h 3+1 1-0 Black's king finds himself blushing after thi s move. 39 ... �C7 40 tt::l a 6+ �d6 41 ..tcs+ 'itc6 42 .l:.b6 is a pretty mate. All four White attackers do their share of the work. Summary

The results from the tests are back from the lab and they are not good for White: 13 h4 doesn't change anything. Black should emerge on the good end of the complications in the dubious 8 axb s ? ! line of the Geller Gambit. 2 10

Th e G e l ler G amb it

Game27 N.Vitiugov-F.Amonatov

Soc h i 2006 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 tt:lc3 tt:lf6 4 tt:lf3 dxc4 5 e4 bs 6 es tt:ld s

1

a4 e6 8 tt:lgs l

I f the Geller Gambit really is pl ayable and passes the test o f theory (I give i t a C - , which is still a passing grade but nothing to brag about!), it i s through thi s line which maintains the queen s ide pawn tension . 8 h6 Giving the heave ho to the knight immediately. Next game we examine 8 .. ..te7. 9 tt:lge4 b4! Best. Black return s the extra pawn to create confusion in White's camp. ...

.

211


Question: I have a strategic idea for White. How about 10 lUa2 ? Here i s m y plan : I take o n c 4 with m y bishop, and redeploy my knight to c1 and then b3 where it eyes as and cs, and covers our d4-pawn . Do you think my plan works? ---

Answer: With this plan you m ake a common mistake, which is to get so deeply im mersed in your own ideas th at you pay insufficient attention to your opponent's plan s and threats. 10lUa2 ?? fails to 10 ...b 3 ! 11lUac3 lUb4 and White finds him self embarrassed by the simple threat ...lUc2+. 10lUb1 iL.a6 11lUbd2

11 lUf41? Black agrees to increase the complexity of the position and sets a little trap. ...

Question: 1 1 ...c3 screams out at me. I s it playable? Answer: Definitely. It may even be as good as or better than the move played in the game. A recent example: 12 bxc3 bxc3 (12 ...lUxc3 also looks good) 13 lUc4 iL.xc4 14 iL.xc4 'i'h4! 1S 'ii'f3lUd7 16 as .tb4, C.Rios-J . Lopez Martinez, Sabadell 2010. White hasn't regained the pawn yet. Black stands at least equal, and probably a touch better. 12 'ii'g4 White doesn't get enough for his pawn after 12 lUxc4? !, which fails to 12 ...lUxg 2+! 13 lLXg 2 lLXC4. 12 lUd3+ 13 iL.xd3 cxd3 .••

212


14 0-0! Question: Why on earth did White avoid 14 lDd6+ which looks crushing? We come crashing through on g 7 if Black takes the knight. If he doesn't his king gets bounced around.

--------�

Answer: Black has a powerful exchange sac in this line: 14 ... .txd6 1 5 'it'xg 7 .tf8 ! 16 'it'xh 8 'ii'xd4 17 0-0 lDd7 18 lDf3 'it'g4 19 .txh 6 'it'hs 20 .tg7 'it'xh 8 2 1 .txh 8 .th6, as played in F.Fiorito-V.Smyslov, Buenos Aires 1990. Black has more than enough compensation for the exchange here.

Question: Really? I would be pretty nervous taking Black. I mean , it's a full exchange in an ending !

213


Answer: But Black has tremendous dynamic compen sation : 1. He has a deep, powerful passer on d3. 2. He has excellent chances of mobilizing his queens ide majority with ... cs, ... c4 and ... c3. 3. He will soon bag the bishop pair. Why? He threatens ... �e7 which gets the bishop pair and wins another pawn. Conclusion : Black is down a full exchange in the ending yet he stands better, having ac cumulated so m any strategic advantages on the side. 14 ...'ifd s ! A novelty and possible improvement. Black wants t o squeeze the most out o f his control over ds and posts his most powerful piece where she is unassailable for quite some time. Other moves in the position : a) 14 ... h s 1 5 'ii'f4 ii..e 7 16 lLlf3 'ifds 17 ii..d 2 lLld7 18 !tfe1 cs 19 dxcs lbxcs 20 ii..xb4 lbxe4 21 l:txe4 ii..xb4 22 l:f.xb4 0-0 was P. Eljanov-M.Godena, Ohrid 2001. That deeply entrenched passed d-pawn should get White nervous. However, White does have chances against Black's king. b) 14... lLld7 1 5 b3 'Was 16 ii..b 2 'Wds (note that it took two moves for Bl ack's queen to reach ds in thi s line) 17 lbc1 0-0-0 18 lbc4 lbb6 with an unclear position, P.Eljanov D.Svetushkin, Alushta 2001. If lLld6+, Black is happy to sac an exchange for a pawn to eliminate White's powerful knight. 15 .:tel lbd7 16 lLlf1?! White doesn't h ave time for this fancy m anoeuvre. He should play 16 b3 with the plan ii..b 2, J:t.ac1 and lbc4 where he has some compensation for the pawn. 16 ... csl

Question: Why give this m ove an exclam ? It looks l ike Black i s breakin g the principle which i s : Don't open the game when you l ag in development. Answer: True, Black breaks that principle but he follows another one, which is: Chip

214


away at the opponent's centre from the sides i f he has a space advantage.

Question: If there are two conflicting principles how am I supposed to know which one to follow? Answer: Nobody said chess was easy! In such situations we draw upon that infallible, mysterious source of energy available to all of us - intuition ! In this case White's slight de velopment lead takes a back seat to Black's demolition of White's centre. 17 dxcs ttJxes There goes White's centre. 18 ltJe3 Possibly White's tricky point but it has a hole in it. 18 ... ltJxg4 19 ltJxd 5 Maybe White deliberately went for this position thinking he had tremendous piece play for his pawn . He was wrong .

Exercise (high difficulty, multiple choice}: If you can penetrate the position deeply enough, there's a win for Black. Which move should he play? a) 19 . 0-o-o; b) 19 . :cs; c) 19 . . exds Thi s is a tough one so take at least 15 minutes to try to work it out. ..

..

.

19 ... 0-0-0?! Answer: Black missed the startling idea 19 ... exdS ! . Most of us would reject such a move without analysis. After all, who allows the opponent to inflict upon him a dreaded double check? If you improve your power of calculation you will not be deterred by such scary looking lines. In this case Black emerges with a winning position after 20 ltJf6+ 'it>d8 2 1 .l:te8+ (21 ltJxg4 i.xcs is hopeless for White) 2 1 ...'it>c7 22 .l:.xa8 ltJxf6 2 3 l:txa7+ i.b7.

215


White's rook has wandered into no-man 's land on a7. Al so, Black threaten s ... t2Je4 followed by ... d2, and also ... i.xcs. White's trouble is: 1. He is technically down m aterial ; 2. He will soon have to cough up more m aterial since his rook is cornered on a7; and 3. His attack i s headed nowhere. For example, 24 i.e3 t2Je4 2 S l:tc1 (covering cs) 2S ... i.xcs ! ! (Oops ! My mistake ! Black cap tures anyway) 26 i.xcs (26 :as d4! doesn't help White at all since 27 i.xd4 d2 wins) 26 ... t2Jxcs 27 l:txcs+ 'it>b6 (Black regains his exchange and wins the rook ending easily) 28 l:txb7+ 'it>xcs 29 'it>f1 l:te8 30 l:tc7+ 'it>d4 3 1 1:tc1 d2 32 l:td1 'it>d3. The kin g of king s ! White is helpless. If you solved thi s one you are a GM, or will be one soon ! 20 t2Jxb4 i.b7 21 i.d2 l:.d4?1 Black still keeps some initiative after the more accurate 2 1...aS ! 22 t2Ja2 .l:d4 23 t2Jac3 ttJes . 22 c6? White loses his bearings. He fights back to equality after 22 t2Jd6+! i.xd6 23 cxd6 l:txd6 24 f3 t2Jf6 2 5 .::te cl+! 'it>d7 26 i.f4! (this trick regains the lost pawn) 26 ... d2 27 l:.dl l:td4 28 .Uxd2. 22 ...i.xb41 White gains the initiative after 22 ... i.a8 ? ! 23 t2Ja6 i.xc6 24 1:tac1. 23 cxb7+ 'it>xb7 24 i.xb4 .::tx b4 2 5 ttJcs+ 'it>b6 26 t2Jxd3 l:.b3 27 h3?1 27 l:te4 tLlf6 28 l:td4 was his best shot at saving the game. 27 ...l:.xd3 28 hxg4 l:.hd8 29 l:tac1 l:.3d4 30 l:.c3 The jigsaw puzzle comes together. The x-factor is Black's active king who soon terrorizes White's queenside pawn s.

216


30 .. .ltd11 A simple and important point: White loses all counterplay against Black's active king if one pair of rooks comes off the board. 31 .l:tb3+ �a s ! 32 'iW1 ltxe1+ 33 �xe1 .l:td7 Covering his second rank. White's a-pawn is doomed. 34 .l:tb8 Question: What about 34 lta3 ? Answer: Never go passive in a rook ending - it i s the kiss of death . It's far better to just eject the pawn and stay active. After 34 .. J:tb7 3 S l:ta2 .l:tb4 White can resign. 34 �xa4 3 5 �e2 •••

Exercise: Come up with a plan to free Black's king from its prison on the a-file. 21 7


Answer: 3 5 ...�a 5 1 Intending . . .�a6 and . . .l:.b7 t o free h i s king . 36 �e3 � a 6 3 7 l:.g8 g 6 38 l:.c8 l:.b7 39 %tc2 �a s 4 0 f 3 �a4 4 1 � d 2 :d7+ 42 �c1 � b s 43 J:lc8 h SI Now Black need not worry about his h-pawn, which can be defended laterally. 44 gxh s gxh s 45 �c2 as 46 �c3 :ds 47 :fa ltfs

Black's rook perform s admirably, covering all three of his pawn weaknesses on as, f7 and h7. The next step is to create a second pawn weakness in White's camp. 48 l:bB+ �c6 49 :gs �d6 50 �d4 :b5 51 :as h4 52 �c3 J:lg5 53 :hs l:txg2 54 .:txh4 l:.f2 There we have it, a second weakness. 55 :d4+ �e5 56 :e4+ �5 57 :a4 :xf3+ 58 �C2 e5 59 :xa 5 J:f2+ 60 �C3 J:f1 61 b4 �4

White's position i s hopeless. The queening race i s not much of a race. It's like when we were six years old and raced our grandmother. Grandma always lost! If White's king tries to help promote his b-pawn it's just too slow. Black simply sacs his rook for the pawn and 218


marches h i s two connected passers, supported by h i s king o n the other side. 62 bS e4 63 l:ta2 e3 64 b6 l:tb1 0-1 The shepherd gets separated from his flock. Compare the two kings. Black's helps his flock forward, whereas White's lags far behind. 6 5 l:tb2 would lead to a cute finish after 6S ... l:txb2 66 �xb2 e2 67 b7 el 'ii' 68 b8'ii' (check !) 68 ... 'ii'e s (check!). The queen s come off the board, and Black win s the pawn ending. Summary

14 ... 'ii'd S! looks like a possible improvement over 14 ... h4 and 14 ... lLld7. Black's queen on dS radiates power and is free from harassment.

Game28 R.Buhmann-V.Akopian

Ma i nz (r a pid) 2009 1lLlf3 d s 2 d4lLlf6 3 c4 c6 4lLlc3 dxc4 5 e4 bs 6 eslLld s Only move ! 8 ..te7

1

a4 e6 SlLlgs l

...

The alternative to 8 ... h6, which we looked at last game. Black provokes h4 and only then plays ... h6, reasoning that a bishop on e7 is more useful than White's h-pawn thrust.

Question: Is thi s really true? Are there not problems on g 7 i f the bishop is brought out t o e7 early? Answer: Quite correct: 1. First, h4 i s a very useful attacking move for White. It's intimidating, allows a rook lift to h3 and will most certainly get Black nervous about castling kingside.

219


2. Black's ... JJ..e 7, a developing move, has its downside: g7 is left unprotected and 'ii'g 4 is in the air. He can push his pawn forward one square to g6, which creates dark-squared weaknesses in his camp. He can play ... �8 and lose his castling rights, and keep his rook on h8 in the dark. Or he can play back to f8 with his bishop, in which case his 8 ... ..ie7 should be a dubious move. Conclusion : It's hard to say which move is better. I would probably go for 8 ... h6 and leave the bishop on f8, as in our previous game. 9 h4 This may be best, but not obligatory: 9 lt:Jge4 b4 10 lt:Jb1 fs ! ? was played in L.Aronian-V. Kramnik, Monte Carlo (rapid) 2007.

I am always amazed when I hear chess players describe Kramnik as a quiet positional player. If you take a close look at his games you see he is actually one of the most confron tational players around, but in a strategic way. His last move is an example. Kramnik picks a fight with White, reasoning that Black is actually ahead in development after White's knight retreat to b1. The game continued 11 exf6 lt:Jxf6 12 lt:Jxf6+ ..ixf6 13 ..ixc4 'ii'xd4 14 ir'h S+ g6 15 'ii'e 2 'ii'e s ! 16 'ii'x es ..txe s 17 o-o when White clearly had compen sation for the pawn in the form of several black pawn targets. But does White stand better? I doubt it. A pawn is a pawn, especially after queen s come off.

Question: Can White play more aggressively with 9 'ii'h s in stead of 9 h4? Answer: This more aggressive move i s a blunder which loses material : 9 'ii'h s ? g6 10 'ifh 6 lt:Jb4! 11 'ii'g 7 lU8 and White faces dual unanswerable threats on gS and c2, K. Pod zielny-S.Strating, Gent 1993. 9... h6 10 lt:Jge4 b4 Even though this move commits us to returning the extra pawn it's a good one. We push White's knight back to its original square and gain time. 11 lt:Jb1 ..i a6

2 20


S o w e reach a position very similar t o last game, with the distinction of the extra moves ... i.e7 and h 2 -h4 tossed in. It's hard to say who benefits more from thi s trade-off, but I would think White, who has been handed a target on g7. 12 tt:'lbd2 The main move in the position, and to my mind, not the most logical. Why not hit Black immediately on his one vulnerable spot, g7? 12 'ii'g 4! 'IittS (the only path for Black; all other moves leave him worse) 13 tt:'lbd2 c3 14 tt:'lc4 i.xc4 15 i.xc4 tt:'lb6 ! 16 i.xe6! (no choice White is in too deeply and must sac) 16 .. .fxe6 17 l:f.h 3 was S.William s-S.Collins, Bunratty 2006. Here the position remains unclear with White having full compensation for the piece if Black plays the correct 17 ... 'ii'd 7. 12 ... c3

13 tt:'lc4 Question: I don 't understand this. Why didn 't White toss in 13 bxc3 first? Answer: The m ain reason White avoided 13 bxc3 is that 13...bxc3 14 tt:'lc4 gives Black ac cess to the b4-square. 13 i.xc4 It's never a bad idea in such positions for Black to reduce the number of attackers on the board. He can also try 13 ... cxb2 14 i.xb2 o-o 15 'ii'g 4 �h 8 16l:f.h 3 f5 17 exf6 tt:'lxf6 18 tt:'lxf6 i.xf6 19 i.d3 i.xc4 20 i.xc4 tt:'ld7 with sharp play, li Shilong-Zhou Jianchao, Suzhou 2006. I don't believe Black's chances are any worse. 14 ..txc4 cxb2 15 i.xb2 as 16 'ii'g4 This is the recurring problem with the 8 ... i.e71ine: Black must do something about g7. ..•

221


Question: Black has three logical options at this point: 16 ... g6, 16 ...�8 and 1 6 .. 0-0. How am I supposed to know which one to pick? .

Answer: You are a glutton for punishment! Am I going to be forced to lecture on about the wonders of intuition once again? This is another situation where there may be no cor rect an swer. You play it by feel and head the direction your intuition leads you. 16 g6 Let's take a look at the other options. Rybka came up with these scenarios: a) 16 ...0-0 17 l:th 3 �h 8 18 l:td1 l2Jd7 19 l:tg 3 J:tg 8 20 h S fS 21 exf6 tD7xf6 22 l2Jxf6 gxf6! 23 'ir'xe6 11xg 3 24 fxg 3 'ir'd6 2 5 'ir'xd6 .ixd6. Black stands clearly better in the ending due to his passed b-pawn. White's doubled pawns on the other wing are devalued. b) 16 ... �f8 17 h S l2Jd7 18 .Uh 3. It looks to me like White has adequate attacking chances since .. .fs will be risky now for Black. Conclusion : 16 ... g6 and 16 ... 0-0 look like better choices for Black than 16 ... �f8. 17 .:.c1 Another option is 17 hS gS 18 o-o, but preparing an eventual f4 break doesn 't look too intimidating from Black's perspective. 17 h5 18 'ir'f3 l2Jd7 19 g3 l:tc8! 20 .ia6 .:.c7 21 l2Jd6+ Black consolidates after 21 o-o o-o 22 I::.c 2 cs. 21....ixd6 22 exd6 .:.a1 2 3 l:txc6 o-o 24 .ibs l2Jb8! The clever point: Black regains his pawn . A Henry James character once observed in his novel Washing ton Square: "Do you think it is better to be clever than to be good? You are good for nothing unless you are clever! " ..•

•.•

222

Th e G e ller G am b i t

2 5 lies 'ir'xd6 An assessment: 1. White finds him self down a pawn . 2. His bishop pair is equally matched by Black's knights, which m ay soon control f6 and ds. 3 . Black's protected passed b-pawn ensures an ending victory. 4. White enjoys an uncontested dark-squared bishop which, although for the moment is snubbed on b2, has potential to do harm later. Conclusion : White doesn't have enough for the pawn and must attempt a desperado attack or die trying. 26 g4 hxg4 2 7 'ir'xg4lt::ld 7 28 h S 'ir'f4! 29 'ir'xf4! The trouble is White can't keep queens on the board. If 29 'ir'e2, then 29 ... lt::l x cs 30 dxcs lt::lc 3 ! shuts down the attack. 29 ...lt::lxf4 30 hxg6 No choice. White is ready to sac an exchange to open the a1-h8 diagonal. 30 ...lt::lxcs l Boldly baring his throat t o the hungry wolf that lies in wait o n b2. Black is unafraid of ghosts and grabs the exch ange, allowing White the long diagonal for his dark-squared bishop. 3 1 gxf7+ llaxf7 32 dxcs 32 ...lt::lg 2+? Allowing White right back into the game. 32 ...l:tfS ! 33 c6 lies i s the best method of snuffing out White's initiative. 33 �dl ltxf2 34 �cl b3 35 c6li::le 3

223


Exercise (multiple choice}: White must find an effective attackin g plan. Your options are: a) 3 6 c7; b) 3 6 l:tg l+; c) 3 6 l:th 3 . There are two reasonable choices, and o n e false path ...

36 l:th3? Answer: Anything but this move ! Both 3 6 c7 and 3 6 l:tg 1+ work. For example: a) 36 c7! l:tc2+ 3 7 'i!tb1 e s 3 8 .l:.c1 ! and Black is struggling due to the combined power of White's c7 passer and bishop pair; b) 36 l:f.g 1+ 'i!th 7 37 �d3+ ttJfs 38 c7 lk8 39 �es l:ta2 40 'i!tb1 .:txa4 41 'i!tb2. Here also White's paralysing pawn on c7 keeps Black tied down. 36 ...l:tc2+ 3 7 'i!tb1 tbc4?1 37 ...l:tff2 ! is even stronger. After 3 8 �es .l:tfd2 39 .l:.h 1 ltds 40 �b2 ltd1+ 41 .l:.xd1 tbxd1 42 �es 'i!tf7 Black will slowly encroach upon the c-pawn and pick it off after a timely ... tbc3+. 38 l:tg3+ 'i!th7 39 ltxb3 l:txb2+ 40 ltxb2 tbxb2 41 'i!txb2 'i!tg6 42 'i!tc3 'iW6 43 �a6 'i!te7 44 'i!tc4 'it.?d6 45 'i!tbs 'i!tc7 46 'i!txa s :as! o-1 Black win s after 47 'i!tbs e s 48 �b7 e4! . Summary

I prefer 8 ...h 6 over 8 ... �e7, which is also playable but I feel gives White more chances due to his target on g7.

224

Chapter Five

Fifth Move Alternatives

1 d4 d 5 2 c4 c6 3 lZ'lf3 lZ'lf6 4lZ'lc3 dxc4

None of White's fifth-move alternatives should keep us up at night tossing about full of ang st: 5 e3: The Quiet Line

As the name implies, White plays peacefully and we reach a position akin to a Queen 's Gambit Accepted where Black attains easy equality. That's fine with us if the opponent is willing to hand over equality. Our goal : win in 100 moves. 5 g3: The Catalan Gambit

In my bigoted pro-Slav opinion, thi s is less a gambit and more like a free pawn for Black. If 225


you practice this kind of position, taking the White pieces against Rybka and/or Fritz, they eat the pawn like a starved m an at a buffet and prove to you that the gambit is not so great for White. 5 lbes: The Catalan Gambit/Benoni

White probably wants a Catalan Gambit but picks a less-than-accurate move order which we meet with s ... lt:Jbd7 ! . This move may be superior to actually allowing White the not-so great Catalan Gambit. In our version with s ... lt:Jbd7 !, White typically executes the following unforced knight gyration : lt:Jf3, lt:Je s, lt:Jxc4 and lt:Je3. So he uses up four moves to tran sfer his knight to wh at appears to me to be a totally idiotic square, blocking his development.

Game29 L.Cyborowski-Lfressinet

Ger ma n L eague 2009 1 d4 d S 2 lDf3 lt:Jf6 3 c4 c6 4 lt:Jc3 dxc4 5 e3

This leads to the Quiet Line where positions closely resemble the Queen's Gambit Ac cepted. s ... bs

Question: Why does Black play ... bs when he knows he can't h an g on to the extra pawn ? Answer: Black can 't hang on to the pawn, yet ...b S ! is a good move for the following rea son s: 1. White loses time in regaining the pawn . ... b4 hits the knight on c3 and sends it to a2 or bl.

226

Fif t h M o ve A l tern a t i ve s

2. Black enjoys territorial gains o n the queenside. Thi s may later lead t o inroads into White's position in endings. Every alternative for Black is worse: a) s ... ..tfs ? makes absolutely no sense here, since after 6 ..txc4 e6 White reaches a posi tion clearly superior to what he gets in Chapter 1: 1. White has not weakened his b4-square because his pawn sits on a2 rather th an on a4, as in Chapter 1. 2. White is up a tempo over Chapter 1 since he didn't waste a move on a2-a4. 3. After 'iie 2 White is all set to kick the bishop around with e3-e4. b) s ... i.e6? ! has a bad reputation, although it is sometimes utilized as a surprise weapon against a booked up opponent. 6 tt:Jg s ..tds 7 e4 h6 8 exds hxg s 9 dxc6 tt:Jxc6 10 dS tt:Jes 11 i.xg s a6 12 'iid4 'iic 7 13 i.f4 tt:Jfd7 14 ..txc4! won a pawn in E.Levin-S.Khamitskiy, Peterhof 2007. I don 't buy into Black's compen sation, and after 14 ... g s 15 i.xes 'iix es+ 16 'iix es tt:Jxe s 17 ..te2 .Uc8 18 o-o-o White has decent chances to convert his advantage. 6 a4 b4

7 lt:J a2 Next game we examine the alternative, 7 lt:Jb1. Question: What are the differences between the two m oves? Answer: 1. When White plays lt:Jb1, he plans lt:Jd2 to recapture the pawn. Black usually responds with ... c3. White's knight will move again. Black's c3-pawn is usually too extended for Black to hang on to it. The trouble for White is when he recaptures the pawn, the game is even since he wastes so much time regaining it. 2. When White plays tt:Ja2 he simultaneously hits b4 and c4, en suring recapture of his missing pawn. The knight is usually then redeployed to b3 via c1 where it eyes Black's ... cs pawn break. The problem : Bl ack is usually ready to pl ay ... cs by this time, with equality.

22 7


7 ... e6 8 �XC4 lZJbd7 9 �d2 a S 10 lZJc1 �b7 This bishop sits on an excellent diagonal, controlling the key dS- and e4-squares when Black achieves ... cs. 11 lDb3

Black needs to play ... cs soon. When he does, his queen will be vulnerable on d8. There are a couple of ways Black m ay rig his pieces to solve this problem : 1. Black posts his bishop on e7 and his queen on b6, as he does in this game. 2. Black posts his bishop on d6 and his queen on e7. 11 ...�e7 An example of Plan 2 would be 11 ... �d6 12 0-0 0-0 13 'i'e2 cs 14 .:tfd1 'i'e7, where Black has achieved his ... cs break with harmony. 12 0-0 0-0 13 h 371

Question: What is the point of White's l ast move?

_,

_______

Answer: I don't have a clue ! It feels like a l azy move where White just drifts. I suppose he wants to m ake luft for his king, but he should be developing. More normal i s 13 'i'e2 cs 14 llfd1 'i'b6 with full equality, J.Lautier-L.Van Wely, Khanty Mansiysk 2005. 13 ... cs 14 'i'e2 'i'b6 1 S �bs �dSI 16 dxcs tZJxcs 17 tZJxcs �xes Black already stands a shade better: 1. He has more space on the queen side thanks to his b4-pawn. 2. He controls the e4-square. 3. White's bishop sits awkwardly on d2. 4. White's only plus i s that he m ay later be able to occupy the C4 hole with a piece.

228

Fif th M o ve A l t ern a t i v e s

18ll'les :fd8 19ll'ld3 i..e 7 2 0 l:.fclll'le4 The knight will be very annoying here. It m ay pick off the bishop pair, or White m ay be forced to weaken with f2-f3 later on if the knight's presence becomes intolerable. 2 1 i..e 1 White's dorky bishop, deluding himself as a piece full of potential, spurns a swap for Black's powerful knight - a bit like the homely but conceited high school nerd inexplicably turning down a date with the prom queen, reasoning she is not in his intellectual league ! H ad White agreed to the exchange, it would be he who would be spurned. Black would reply 21 l:.d1ll'ld6 ! going after the better bishop on bS. 21 ...ll'ld6 22ll'les What goes down must come up! ? The knight returns once again, like a distrustful rab bit peering down an unfamiliar hole in the forest. White can't find a plan and now just re acts mechanically to Black's threats.

229


Exercise: Should Black grab the bishop pair immediately on b s o r continue t o build with 2 2 . . .:ac8? Both moves are good but one m ay be slightly superior.

22 .. J�ac8!? Answer: Black is in no hurry and felt his knight did more dam age than White's anaemic bishop on bs. Maybe I'm being nitpicky and it may just be a matter of style. I would grab the bishop immediately because it's something tangible. After all, who doesn't want to increase his bank account? After 2 2 ...ll:lxbs, White's position looks devoid of counterplay and his doubled b-pawn is in serious trouble after 2 3 'iixbs 'Wxbs 24 axbs .if6, while 2 3 axb S ? ! .id6 ! 24ll:lc6 .l:tdc8 25 ll:ld4 g 6 looks terrible for White. 23 .td3ll:le4 24 'ilfh s At l ast, a superficial show of strength ! Question: Why doesn't White just boot the knight with 24 f3? Answer: Black has a trick: 24 ... l:txc1 2 S11xc1 .ig s ! 26 .if2ll:lxf2 27 �xf2 fs ! (threatening .. .f4) 2 8ll:lc4 'Wcs, when White's position is on the verge of collapse. 24 ... g6 2 5 'ilff3 ts! White's knight is unstable on e s so Black can get away with this move. 26 'We2ll:lcsl

Targeting a4, b3 and d3. Don 't get fooled by the ease with which Black keeps improving his position. A skilled general is almost invi sible and his army runs smoothly, as if on its own without the commanding officer's direction. In just this way there is a sense of inevi tability about Black's play in this game. We witness subtle strategic magic from Black. It looks easy but in reality, very difficult to emulate.

2 30

Fif t h M o ve A l tern a t i v e s

27 ..t b s ..tf6 28 tb d 3 ..tb3 ! 29 tbxcs �xes 30 e4?!

White's pieces have been sucked into a black hole of inactivity. His last move looks like complete desperation. 30 .. Jii'c 7!? As vapid as it seem s, sometimes it is okay to be m aterialistic! I don't see any reason not to take the pawn with 30 ...fxe4! 3 1 'ii'x e4 �xc1 3 2 l:txc1 ..txb2 3 3 l::tb 1 ..tds, with an extra pawn and initiative. 3 11:txcs 'tli'xcs 32 exfs exfs 33 'ii'f 3? Cracking under the strain and allowing an invasion on c2. White hangs on longer with 33 �fl, but after 33 ... �c8 34 ..td3 'ii'd 6 3 5 �g 1 'ii'e s ! 36 'ii'x es ..txe s 37 �b1 ..ta2 38 �a1 b 3 ! 3 9 ..txas ..txb2 Black's deep b-pawn obviously has more juice than White's a 4 passer. 33 ...'tli'c2 ! 34 'ii'e 3 ..txb2 35 'ii'e 7 .:.fs o-1 Summary

Amazing. Black pulled off a bloodless coup, winning the game without engaging in a single noticeable skirmish. One senses that White lacked the connective tissue to weave together a plan. This game is a good example of how to tangle your opponent up into a knot if he drifts in this line. I used to be afraid of this line, thinking White had an automatic draw out of the opening. Having faced it many times, now I realize that there is no underlying ground or basis for such a fear. White simply hands us equality on a platter. It is our job as Black to slowly improve our position and win these battles.

Game30 L.Nisipeanu-E.Postny

Fr e nch league 2008 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 tbf3 tbf6 4 tbc3 dxc4 5 e3 bs 6 a4 b4 7 lbb1 231


A move as harmless as its wimpy twin 7 tt'la2. 7 ... �a6

Question: Why play this move when we know White win s his pawn back anyway? Answer: The idea is to m ake White sweat a bit before handing back the pawn. The effort White takes to regain the pawn allows us to equalize with comfort. 8 �e2 White recognizes there is no rush to regain his pawn and hurries to castle first. 8 ... e6 9 o-o �e7 10 tt'l bd2

10 .. c3! This liquidation is the simplest path to equality. .

232


Question: Can w e toss in 10. . .-.ds first before playing . . .c3? Answer: Yes, that works too. After 11 "it'c2 c3 12 .ixa6 lbxa6 13 bxc3 bxC3 14 "ii'x c3 lbb4 15 .ia3 as 16 ltfc1 l:tc8 Black's control over b4 gives him compensation for his slight weak ness on cs, G . Flear-A.Kinsman, Paris 1990. 11 bxc3 bxc3 12 lbb1

After 12 moves, White has expended four tempi with his queen's knight to return it to its original square. To be fair though, Black has made an equal number of useless pawn moves on the queenside. Moral : If you waste away a third of your moves don't expect an advantage with White! 12 ...0-0 13 lbxc3 cs Black achieved effortless equality. 14 .ia3 cxd4 15 .ixe7 "it'xe7 16 lbxd4 .ixe2 17 "it'xe2 White hopes he can m ake something of his control over c6. 17 ...l:tc8 18 l:tac1 lbbd7 19 :tc2 :cs 20 l:tfc1 h6?1 I don't understand why he didn't just challenge the file with the simple 20 ....:.ac8, when White has nothing. 21 ltJcbs l:txc2 22 "ii'x c2 White now owns the c-file but this shouldn't lead to real problems for Black. 22 ... lbes 23 h 3 lbd s 24 lbc7 .:tds Not falling for the silly trap 24 ... l:tc8?? 2 S lDxds .:.xc2 26 lbxe7 check! 2 5 lDxd s l:txd s 26 'iic 8+ �h7 27 'ii'c 7 "it'a 3 28 "it'c2+ g6 29 l:tb1 l:tcs White's previous domination of the c-file ends with a whimper. 30 "it'd1 l:tc4 3 1 lDbs!? Wow, Nisipeanu pulls a Mel Gibson and goes bonkers ! As we will soon see, the knight takes an obtuse angle toward Black's king.

233


Question: Why did he give up a pawn when he could easily protect it with 31 l:tat? --------

Answer: Mysterious stuff. Nisipeanu avoids going passive at the cost of a full pawn. We are all taught as beginners to avoid passivity. But an entire pawn just to avoid l:tal seems a bit much ! However, Nisipeanu goes on to win this one and vindicates his very risky decision. 3 1 .'ii'xa4 3 2 'ii'd 6! The key to his counterplay is the weakened dark squares around Black's king. 3 2 .'ii'c2 3 3 l:tf1 'ii'fs 34 'ii'fs ••

••

Exercise (multiple choice): Let's test our analytical abilities here. Should Black go for 34 ...lDf3+? If he did, is the result? a) White wins; b) Black wins; or c) Draw. Back up your choice with analysis.

234

Fif t h M o ve A l tern a t i ve s

Answer: Black should go for it. The correct choice i s 'c', 34. . .t2Jf3+ ! leading t o a draw by perpetual check after 3 5 gxf3 �h4 3 6 t2Jd6 'ii'g S + 3 7 Wh 2 l:txh 3 + ! . Right around here Black begins t o underestim ate h i s opponent's attacking chances and misjudges the position, thinking he is either better or winning. He should take the perpet ual. 34 ...'ii'f6?l 3 5 t2Jd6 l:tc6 Black could al so go with the Neville Chamberlain path of appeasement with 3S ... l:.c2 3 6 t2Je8 'ii'h 8 3 7 'ii'e 7 W g 8 3 8 t2Jd6 'ii'g 7 3 9 'ii'x a7. The trouble is White still has attacking chances as soon as he activates his rook. Churchill once said, "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last ! " 36 tZ:\eBl 'ii'h B 3 7 'ike7 .tlc8 38 t2Jd6 .l:tfB 39 .Uc1 'ii'g 7 4 0 tZ:\e8! 'ii' h B 4 1 t2Jf6+ That wild knight prances around like a runaway garden hose. Meanwhile, Black's king, queen and rook trip over each other, reminding one of the Three Stooges at their best. 41 ... Wg7 Take a look at this position and compare it to the previous diagram . What a tangled mess for Black. Just look at th at Nim zowitschian queen on h8! Black's king squeezes into a tight corner and keeps as quiet as possible, hoping he won't be noticed by White's surging pieces.

Exercise (multiple choice}: Find White's most deadly attacking plan. The choices are: a) 42 :Z.c7; b) 42 f4; c) 42 :Z.a1 intending :Z.xa7

....___

Answer: 42 f4l This move throws a key defender offside. Black can't survive the force of the assault. The less direct 42 l:tc7 actually al so works, but only because after 42 .. Jlc8 ! White can still play 43 f4! and if 43 ... .l:.xc7 44 'ii'x c7 t2Jd3 45 'ii'c 3 ! . 4 2 ...t2Jd3 43 l:tc7 a s 4 4 l:td7

235


44 lbd7 is also very strong . 4 4. . .lbb4 45 'ii'x e6 a4 4 6 f51 The battering ram breaks down Black's protective barrier.

Exercise: Work out the quickest m ates after 46 ... g5 and 46 ... g xf5. Answer: a) 46 ... g 5 47 lbg4! (a check i s not always the best move; I bet you analysed a knight check on h 5 , didn't you?) 47 ... 'ii'h7 48 'ii'f6+ �g 8 49 lbxh 6+ m ates. b) 46 ... gxf5 47 'ii'xf5 a3 48 'ii'g 4+! (thi s shot i s not so easy to see) 48 ... �xf6 49 l:td6+ �e7 (or 49 ... �e5 50 'ii'f4 m ate ! ) 50 'ii'd7 m ate ! 46 ... h 5 47 lDd 5! �gs 47 ... lbxd5?? 48 'ii'x g6 mate would be cute ! 48 ltxf7! 'ii'a 1+ 48 ... l:txf7 49 fxg 6 'ii'g 7 50 lbxb4 is not much help either. 49 �h2 1-0 Summary

The Quiet Line, 7 lbb1 and its twin 7 lba2, both turn out to be duds for White. Our only danger is if we face this line against a lower-rated opponent who wants to draw, in which case we must just patiently outmanoeuvre the opponent.

Game31 R.Wukits-M.Ragger

Austr ia n League 2007 1 d4 d 5 2 lbf3 lbf6 3 c4 c6 4 lbc3 dxc4 5 g3 236

Fif th M o ve A l tern a t ives

I never really saw what the big attraction was to the Catalan Gambit as White. However, please be warned: I am a notorious bigot when it comes to all thing s Slav and rush to Black's defence in every line! James Vigus writes, "I have plenty of respect for the Catalan style gambit 5 g 3 ." I, on the other hand, just see the Catalan as a generous gift of a pawn from my opponent! My disdain for the Catalan Gambit goes back to a trauma I sustained in 1989. I went into the final round of a weekend tournament leading GM Igor Ivanov by a half point and had command of the White pieces. One look at his rocking gait and his undecipherable scoresheet told me Igor had enjoyed a liquid lunch and was drunk. I had already chalked up the point in my head, and began daydreaming about posing for the photo next to the first place trophy and how to spend the first prize cheque. At thi s point of the game, Igor's ine briated state emboldened me to play the Catalan G ambit. What I failed to factor in was that a hammered Igor was possibly still the slight favourite over a sober, tea-swigging me! Igor hung on to his extra pawn like grim death and gave me a beating the way an abusive father would to a disliked stepchild. Igor bumped me out of the main prize money and he did it without breaking a sweat! So even though Igor was drunk, I was the one who suf fered the hangover! Please study this equation carefully: Talent + alcohol > no talent + Catalan Gambit + so briety! s ... bs 6 i.g2 e6 6 ...i.b7 nearly always transposes back to the game position.

23 7


7 lbes Threatening both the c6-pawn and lbxbs. White must react vigorously. If he goofs around he risks consolidation from Black. For example, 7 o-o .tb7 8 a4 a6 9 e4? ! (too slow in my opinion) 9 ...lbbd7 10 ii'e2 .te7 1 1 e s lbds 12 lbe4 h6 13 h4 'ii'c 7 14 .td2 cs 1 5 axbs axbs 16 dxcs l:txa1 17 l:txa1 lbxcs 18 lbxcs .txcs 19 b3 o-o 20 bxc4 bxc4 was M. Ruderfer A. Karpov, Daugavpils 1971. The c4-pawn is immune, so Black is up a pawn for nothing. Question: You claim this gambit i s barely playable for White, but I seem to get into difficulties defending the Black side. And I would al so remind you of Vigus's ominous comm ent on the Catalan Gambit. What should I do? Answer: Study it! There is no m agic variation for Black. It is up to you to try to under stand it. If you just go over a lot of games in this variation you begin to get a feel for how to set up a defence. You al so need to know when to pl ay ... cs and when not to. As your experi ence grows in the line, so will your confidence in Black's ability to fend off White's initia tive. 7 .. .'ii'b6 Alternatively: a) 7 ... lbds 8 a4 f6 ! ? 9 lDf3 b4 10 lbe4 .te7 11 o-o o-o 12 'ii'c 2 .ta6 13 .th 3 fS 14 lbeg s b3! and White found it more difficult than expected to regain his pawn in B.Gelfand-A.Shirov, Paris 1992. b) 7 ... a6 ! ? offers to return the pawn for gain of time. After 8 lbxc6 'ii'b 6 9 lDe s .tb7 10 e4 lbc6 11 i.e3 l:td8 12 lbxc6 'ii'x c6 1 3 o-o .tcs ! 14 ds 'ii'b 6 I like Black's chances against the ds-pawn, M.Matlakov-I .Cheparinov, Sestao 2010. 8 0-0 .tb 7

238

Fif th M o ve A l tern a t i ves

9 e4 9 a4 is also dangerous, keeping the diagonal open, e.g. 9 ... a6 10 b 3 ! (giving up a second pawn for initiative) 10 ... cxb3 (Rybka suggests 10 ... tLld5 ! ?) 11 'it'xb3 'it'xd4 12 axbs axbs 13 l:txa8 i.xa8 14 i.f4 gave White an admittedly scary development lead for the pawns in P.Tregubov-A.Fier, Barcelona 2009. Maybe Vigus was right after all ! 9 tLlbd7 10 i. e3 cs!? ...

Question: This looks risky. Isn't Black breaking one of your most sacred principles, n amely, he's opening the game when behind in development? Answer: True, but he also follows one, which states: Chip away at your opponent's cen tre if he has a space advantage. Black intuitively feel s he can get away with this move and castle to safety before trouble ari ses in the centre. 10 ... l::t d 8 11 'ir'e2 cs 12 l:tad1 cxd4 13 i.xd4 i.cs 14 tbxd7 .l:txd7 15 i.xf6 l:txd1 16 .:txd1

239


gxf6 was played in H .Pohjala-K.Kulon, Novi Sad 2007. Rybka claims White has compensa tion for the pawn, probably due to the insecure situation of Black's king. Here White should have played this way: 17 'ii'd 2 0-0 18 e 5 ..ltxg 2 19 exf6 ..ltxf2+ 20 'it>xg 2 ..lte3 with an unclear position. 11 a4 a6 12 axbs axbs 13 .:txa8+ ..ltxa8

Exercise: I s it worth it to g ain a tempo with 14 'iVa1, which hits Black's loose bishop and clears d1 for his rook?

------�

-----�

14 'ii'a 1?! Answer: White can't play this line and then drift. Black's bishop simply moves. Later on Black may, in fact, g ain a tempo on White's queen with ....:ta8. White's queen was better placed on d1 where she could help out with the d5 central break. White must react with force. For example, 14 lLixd7 ! ltJxd7 15 d5 ! e 5 ? (15 ... -lte7! offers at least equal chances) 16 ..lth 3 ! lLif6 17 b 3 ! and White opened the position before Black was ready in G . De Boer-A.Bang, Copenhagen 1986. 14 -ltb7 15 l:.d1?1 Too slow. He had to try 1 5 ltJxd7 ltJxd7 16 d5 ..lte7, although even then I like Black's chances. 1S ... cxd4 16 �xd4 �cs 17 lLixd7 lZ:Ixd7 18 ..ltxg71 ? White gets into a knife fight with his opponent but forgets his knife at home! This move creates unintended consequences, speeding up his loss. White's king is harmed more than Black's by thi s trade-off. That said, by now nothing really works for White. For example, 18 ltJe2 o-o 19 b3 l:ta8 20 'i'b2 cxb3! 2 1 ..ltxg 7?? (if 2 1 'ii'x b3 White is just down a clear pawn after 2 1 ... b4) 2 1 ... :a2 wins. •..

240

Fif th M o ve A l tern a ti v e s

18....i.xf2+ 19 'ifi>h1 l:t gs 20 .i. h6 ltJ es ... ltJg4 and ...ltJd3 are in the air. 21 b3 ltJg4 22 ltJxbs A cry for help more than a sac. If White tries the calmer 2 2 .i.f4 then Black has a trick:

Exercise: Find a knockout punch for Black in thi s position.

Answer: 2 2 ... Jt.e1 ! . After thi s clearance shot White has no good defence to the mon ster knight check coming on f2: a) 2 3 l:txe1 ltJf2+ 24 'ifi>g 1 ltJh 3+ 2 5 'ifi>hl 'ii'g l+ (this smothered m ate i s so routine that it doesn't deserve an exclam ! ) 26 l:txg 1 ltJf2 m ate. b) 23 h 3 ltJf2+ 24 Wh 2 .i.xc3 25 'iix c3 ltJxd1 26 'ii'd 2 'ii'd 8 win s a full rook. 22 ... 1t.cs 1 o-1

241


It's time to turn out the lights. Bl ack threatens .. .'ii'xbs as well as ... lDf2+ and ... lbxh6. Summary

Maybe the post traumatic stress disorder sustained from the loss to Igor Ivanov in 1989 permanently impaired my ability to detect danger from the Catalan Gambit! Nevertheless, I stubbornly stick to my guns and declare to you that the gambit is semi-sound at best for White.

Game32 S.Mamedyarov-V.Topalov

Be n idor m (r a pid) 2003 1 d4 dS 2 C4 c6 3 lDf3 l2Jf6 4 l2Jc3 dxc4 S lDeS?! I believe this i s an inaccurate move order for White if he wants to go for a Catalan Gambit (5 g3 is better). s lDbd7! As in Ch apter 2, we meet lDes with ... lbbd7. This line is just a lot simpler and probably stronger than s ...b s ! ? 6 g3 il.b7 7 il.g 2 a6 which gives the position a Catalan Gambit fla vour. ...

6 lbxc4 6 f4? ! b S ! 7 lDxc6 'it'b6 8 lbes e6 9 e3 il.b7, as played in O. Rom anishin-V.Akopian, Linares 1996, leaves White with a rather shaky looking Reversed Stonewall Dutch formation . Black's cl amp on e4 gives him the edge. Question: How about gam biting the pawn with 6 lbxd7 i.. x d7 7 e4 b S ? Answer: White doesn't have enough compensation.

242


Question: Why? Answer: He played lLlf3, lLles and l2Jxd7, which blew two tempi. So White is actually technically behind in development, as well as a pawn down. 6 bs! ...

This is the problem for White, whose knight gets kicked around until kingdom come. Unlike in Chapter Two, 6 ... l2Jb6 is not very effective here. After 7 e4 l2Jxc4 8 i.xc4 bS 9 i.d3 ! 'Wxd4 10 lLlxb S ! 'Wb6 11 l2Jc3 White has the edge due to his superior pawn structure, M.Sadler-J. Hector, London 1991. 7 lLl e 3 White invested four moves to bring the knight to an awkward square. After 7 l2Jd2 i.b7 8 e4 e s 9 dxe s lLlxes 10 'Wc2 a6 11 i.e2 cs I already prefer Black, who has control over d4, H .Wirthensohn-D. Kom arov, Ticino 1993. 7 ...i. b7 8 g3

Question: Why would White play such a m ove if he sees that Black will play ... cs next move? Answer: Believe it or not, he has nothing better. That awkward knight on e3 plugs up White's development. In fact, every single game in my database continued with 8 g 3 . Let's look for another idea i f 8 g 3 bothers you s o much : 8 a 3 e 6 9 lLlc2 preparing e4. This just looks like a typical Semi-Slav position for Black. It appears White m ay have just lost his mind and played the random manoeuvre l2Jf3, lLles, l2Jxc4, lLle3 lLlc2. So five moves to get to c2 - not such a great bargain for White! S cs 9 d S Welcome t o the Slav Benoni! Nobody would believe this arose from a Slav. 9 i.g 2 isn't exactly in spiration al either. 9 ... i.xg 2 10 l2Jxg 2 'Wb6 11 dxcs lLlxcs 12 i.e3 e6 13 o-o ft7 gave Black a very nice looking Catalan in J.Timman-V.Topalov, Sarajevo 1999. •.•

243


9 a61 This is the most accurate of Black's options: a) 9 ... b4? ! 10 l2Ja4 e6 11 dxe6 fxe6 (Black's bishop doesn't escape from h 1 if he gets greedy and takes the rook) 12 ..ig2 ..ixg 2 13 l2Jxg 2 was N.Sulava-C.Horvath, Budapest 1990. At least in this position White can play on Black's slight pawn weakness at e6. b) 9 ... l2Jb6? ! 10 ..ig2 'ii'd 7 11 a4 b4 12 as bxc3 13 axb6 and White stands slightly better, C.De Saegher-P.Boersma, Netherlands league 1994. 10 i.g2 g6 •••

Question: What are you g etting me into? I am a Slav player and don't understand such positions ! _____.......

Answer: I will let you in on a little secret. It's a Benoni, but a strange one, like one from a Salvador Dali painting. White's knight awkwardly blocks his e-pawn and the black pawn

244

Fif th M o ve A l tern a tives

which should be on d6 (in a real Benoni) sits oddly on e7. Overall I think thi s is a good trade off for Black, who achieves dynamic equality. And don't worry, you have my assurance that your opponent will be just as confused as you are ! 11 o-o .i.g7 12 a41 After 12 'iWc2 o-o 13 lld1 llc8 14 b3 'iWb6 15 .i.b2 .i.h6 ! 16 tt:'lf1 c4 17 b4 tt:'lg4 18 e3 tt:Jge s Black i s infiltrating with initiative, A.Yermolinsky-W.Kobese, Hyderabad 2002. 12 ... b4 Black's pawns become vulnerable if he tries to avoid accepting a hole on C4 with 12 ... 'ifb6 ? ! 13 'ifh3 C4? 14 'iWb4! . 13 tt:'lb1 The fight is on for the c4-square. 13 ... as 14 'i6'c2 o-o 15 tt:'ld2 tt:JeSI

Nice positional play: 1. Black's bishop on g 7 comes alive. 2. Black sends his f6-knight over to help with the battle for C4. 3. Black inconveniences White, who wants to play b2-b3 and .i.b2 to challenge the long diagonal. 16 tt:Jec4 tt:'ld6 17 e4 At long l ast he activates his central pawn m ajority. 17 ... .i.a6 18 lld1 l1c8 19 f41? Thematic but weakening. White can also try the more conservative 19 .i.h 3 . 1 9. . .tt:'lb6 2 0 .i.f1 .i.d4+ 21 'ifilg2

245


Exercise: Black has two(!) combinations in thi s position . See if you can find at least one of them.

--------��--�

Answer: 21 .. .lbdxc41 21 ... lt:Jbxc4! 2 2 lt::l x c4 b 3 ! also works for Black and may even be stronger than Topalov's choice. After 23 'ii'x b3 lt::l x e4 White faces big problems : 1. Black will exert pressure down the b-file; 2. White's once proud centre has been chopped down ; and 3. The ds-pawn is in trouble. 22 lt:Jxc4 If 22 �xc4 lt:Jxc4 2 3 lt:Jxc4 Black has 23 .. .fS ! . 2 2 ... lt:Jxd s !

246


The point of Topalov's combination : the knight can 't b e touched in view o f 2 3 exd5?? 'iix d5+ 24 �h 3 'iih 5 + 2 5 �g 2 .ib7+ 26 'iie 4 .ixe4 m ate. 23 .ie2 tiJf6 24 .if3 'iic 7 2 5 .id2?1 In desperation White sacs a second pawn. 2 5 e 5 ttJe8 doesn't bother Black since he challenges the long diagonal on b7 and rede ploys his knight via g7. Still, thi s is how White should continue. 25 ....ixc4 26 'iixc4 .ixb2 27 .l:tabl .id4 28 .:.bel tiJd7 Preparing to eject the White queen from c4. Once the blockade i s broken, Black's pawns roll forward. 2 8 ... e 5 ! looks good too. 29 .ixb41? Hoping to confuse m atters. However, the move isn 't much of a remedy. To be fair though, passive defence was also hopeless. 29 ...axb4 30 l:.xd4 'iia 7 3 1 .l:td2 t2Jb6 3 2 'ii b 5

Exercise: I s 3 2 ...ttJxa4 possible? Calculate the possibilities.

Answer: Yes ! 3 2 ... t2Jxa41 3 3 .:tal 33 .:.d7 fails to 33 ... t2Jc3 ! 34 l:.xc3 'iia 2+. 33 ... tiJc3 1 Thi s is the trick which allows Black t o escape the pin . 34 'iifl 'iic 7 3 5 e5 c4 36 l:.a6 'iic 5 3 7 e6 f5 38 h4 ttJe4 39 .:.d7 c3 40 .:.aa7 c21 0-1 In m any ways Topalov is a simple m an who wants only one thing in life: His way! 41 .:.xe7 'ii'x e7 ! 42 .l:txe7 cl'ii ends White's would-be attack and leaves Black up a rook. Summary

If White wants a Catalan Gambit against the Slav, he should probably use the 5 g 3 move order. After 5 ttJe5 ttJbd7 ! Black forces White into an inferior Catalan or Benoni. 24 7

Chapter Six

4 e 3 Lines and 3 lb c 3 d xc4

In this chapter we examine two White setups involving e2-e3, plus a third-move diver gence on Black's part. Let's avoid our theoretical cousin, the Semi-Slav, and try a couple of alternatives for Bl ack. Don't worry, I'm not going to try to sell you weird lines. Luckily for us, the Slav is a many splendored thing and there are multiple playable option s.

White sets

up

with ltJf3 and e3

1 d 4 d S 2 c4 c 6 3 tLlf3 tLlf6 4 e3 .IUS

This is one of White's most fashionable and also most deadly options. Both of Kramnik's losses to Topalov in their World Championship match were with Black in this line. In this case I suggest the Reversed London. The albatross across our neck is th at White chases 248

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 lt:J c 3 dxc4

down our fS-bishop with lt:Jh4 and is content to nurse his bishop-pair strategic advantage. lnarkiev-Shirov {Game 3 5) i s a good example of how to aggressively deal this line an unex pected blow in pure london style.

White sets

up

with lt:Jc3 and e3

1 d 4 d 5 2 c4 c 6 3 0Jc3 lt:Jf6 4 e 3 a6

White can also play the lt:Jc3/e3 setup. Here the Reversed london doesn 't work well for Black, so I suggest the 4 ... a6 Chebanenko Slav (Games 36-37). There is no need to study the entire Chebanenko. Instead we order our opening a la carte and only deal with the 4 ... a6 lines where White commits to lt:Jc3 and e3, which limits our homework.

3 li:Jc3 dxc4 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 lt:Jc3 dxc4

249


Sometimes a war between two parties spill s into a neighbouring country. In this case we look at a third-move alternative for Black, 3 ...dxc4, in a chapter on 4 e 3 ! This is in case you still don't like the Chebanenko, even after my sales pitch on it! 3 ... dxc4, which can only really be played if White chooses the 3 lZ'lc3 move order, is gain ing popularity along with the ... a6 Slav lines and is a good way to throw most White players out of their normal stride. See Deep Fritz-Kramnik (Game 38).

Game33 L.Sussman-C.Lakdawala

G a m bito (r a pid), Sa n Diego 2009 My buddy, Lenny Sussman, i s under tremendous pressure each time we play. The rea son : I usually give him a lift home after our Saturday Gambito tournaments, and threaten to stand him up and make him take the bus home if he beats me. (Lasker: "The threat is stronger than the execution ! ") 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 lZ'lf3 White can al so play 3 e3 before committing either of his knights. Then 3 ...lZ'lf6 tran s poses to thi s chapter after either 4 lZ'lf3 or 4 lZ'lc3, while 3 ....tfs is al so fine for Black (see Game 1). 3 ... lZ'lf6 4 e3 .tfs We meet White's setup with a Reversed London System . I have found that Slav players are happiest with our bishops perched nobly on fs . To save space we won't cover 4 ... .tg4 (the Reversed Torre) or 4 ... e6 (the Semi-Slav), which of course, the reader m ay play if he or she has experience and familiarity with either. 5 lZ'lc3 e6

6 .te2 A quiet and harm less respon se. Lenny is a man of peace, and happy to draw and still get 250

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 t:D c 3 dxc4

a lift home. Next game we examine White's most dangerous line 6 !Dh4!, going after the bishop pair. Some alternatives: a) 6 .id3 .ig6 7 0-0 t:Dbd7 8 .ixg 6 ? ! (there i s very little profit for White in opening the h file) 8 ... hxg6 9 'ii'e 2 (9 'ii'd 3 is better) 9 ...!De4! 10 t:Dxe4 dxe4 11 !Dd2 'ii'h 4 12 h 3 !Df6 (threat ening the plan ... .id6, ... 0-0-0 and ... g s ) 13 f3 exf3 14 t:Dxf3 ? ! 'ii'g 3 15 e4 (15 �h 1? g S ) 1S . . .l:lxh 3 16 e s !D g 4 17 'ii'e 1 (perhaps White should try 17 .if4 'ii'xf4 18 gxh 3 tt:'l e 3 where Black has a lot for the exchange) 17 ... 'ii'x e1 18 l:lxe1 .:th 8 and White didn't have any com pensation for the pawn in P.Nikolic-V. Ivanchuk, Kerner 2007. b) 6 'ii'b 3 'ii'b 6 and now: b1) I sometimes get the blunder 7 tt:'lh4? in blitz: 7 ... 'ii'x b3 8 axb3 .ic2 ! picks off a pawn :

b2) 7 cS 'ii'c 7 8 tt:'lh4 1Le4 9 f3 .ig6 10 tt:Jxg6 hxg6 11 f4 !Dbd7 12 g 3 b6 (breaking down his space advantage and forcing a swap of his c-pawn for my a-pawn) 13 cxb6 axb6 14 1i.g2 .id6, "sovaco"-C.Lakdawala, Internet (blitz) 2009. Black later plays ... cs or ... bS, giving him counterplay. c) 6 cxds exdS (to break the symmetry) 7 .id3 (this is White's good bishop) 7 ... .ixd3 8 'ii'x d3 .id6 9 0-0 0-0 10 ltb1 'iie 7 11 a3 as (making it tough for White to start a minority attack) 12 'iic 2 tt:'lbd7 13 h 3 l:lfe8 14 a4! ? tt:'le4 1 5 tt:Jxe4 dxe4 16 tt:'ld2 t:Df6 17 g 3 ? ! h s 18 !Dc4 1i.c7 19 b3 'ii'e 6 20 �g 2 tt:Jds 2 1 .id2 'ii'fs 22 'ii'd 1 l:le6 23 'ii'e 2 .l:tg6, R.Aeria-C.Lakdawala, San Diego (rapid) 2008. Black is attacking whereas White doesn 't have much going on the opposite wing. d) 6 b3 .ib4! 7 .id2 0-0 8 a3 .id6 and Black has equalized comfortably. White's extra move .id2 hurts him more than it helps, since the bishop is in the way and belong s on b2. 6...tt:'l bd7 7 0-0

251


Question: Why didn't you play 6 ...h 6 to preserve your bishop, and why didn 't White go after the bishop next move? Answer: Well, a couple of reasons: 1. Most Londoners and Slav players (this elite group of champions includes Reversed Londoners) are not afraid of lZ'lh4. We give up our bishop for White's knight all the time. In Chapter 1, for example, Bl ack improves his pawn structure and creates an imbalance which is sometimes not so bad if you are the higher-rated player going for the win. So I won 't bother with ... h6 thi s early. 2. If White was going to play lZ'lh4, he would almost certainly have done so on move 6 instead of tossing in 6 .ie2 first. What I am saying is th at the move is very playable and probably a good move for White, but psychologically it's not likely. Still, I must admit you are right. I should have tossed in 6 ... h6 (or 7 ... h6) when given a chance. 7 i.d6 ...

252

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 t:D c 3 dxc4

8 h3? This innocent-looking move is not a good idea. Black m ay l ater engineer a pawn storm to exploit it. He should play 8 0Jh4! ..tg 6 reaching Topalov-Kramnik (Game 34). which I don't like for Black, and crucially avoidin g the continuation in lnarkiev-Shirov (Game 3 5) which I do like. So I concede, 7 ... h 6 ! is probably best. 8 h6 There ! Everyone happy? I preserved my bishop. 9 b3 ...

9 0-0?1 ...

Question: Since White committed to an early h3 and you haven't yet castled king s ide, is it possible to take the berserker route with 9 ... 'ife7 10 ..tb2 g S I and castle queenside? Answer: Your plan looks very strong, albeit risky, and I actually considered it during the game. Question: And your reason for rejecting it was ... ? Answer: Fine, I see you are hell bent on extracting a confession . I rejected it out of over caution . I was in that awful place I talked about earlier in the book - the tournament leader going into the fin al round, and The Leader Syndrome (a fancy term for chickenitis) kicked in, so I took the solid route and wimped out. 10 ..tb2 �e7 White has played too quietly for an opening advantage. 11 .:tel ..th7

2 53


Question: Why thi s unforced retreat? Answer: I am glad you asked. I was full of remorse about chickening out of the .. :ike7 and ... g S ! plan earlier and I decided to m ake bold amends. My new plan : ... lt:\e4 followed by .. .fs and even ... g s . 1 2 ..td3 White is ready for e3-e4, so I stop that idea with my next move. 12 ... lt:\e4 13 ..txe4!? Oh goody! An imbalance. I expected something like 13 'iVc2 fs 14 lt:\e2 'iVf6 ! to keep con trol over e s . Black follows with ... g s and attacks the kingside. 13 ...dxe4 14 lt:\d2 fs 15 f3 A natural move to challenge e4, but it opens the game for Black's bishops and may do more harm than good. I was concerned about the plan of planting a knight on d6: 1 5 cs ..tc7 16 lt:\c4 .l:tad8 17 i.. a 3 e s 18 lt:\d6 exd4 19 exd4 i.. x d6 20 cxd6 'ifh4. In the end I still felt Black had good chances for a successful kings ide attack with that rolling kingside m ajority. 15 ... exf3 16 lt:\xf3 16 'iVxf3 es is similar to the game continuation. 16 ... es

2 54

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 l'D c 3 dxc4

Principle: Open the game when you own the bishop pair. 17 l'De2 e4

Question: You just m ade the g ame more closed didn't you? Answer: Yes, seizing space instead. Stay flexible. Chess is a game of bargaining and ne gotiations. 1S l'Dd2 'ifgsl? I'm not sure whether this move is a waste of time or not: 1. 1 was afraid he would play cs, l'Dc4, ..ta3 and l'Dd6, so I forced his knight to fl. 2. My queen is in the way of a kingside pawn storm with ... g s . Conclusion : It's a reasonable trade-off for Black. I just didn 't want t o see a white knight in my face on d6. 19 l'Df1 The Maginot Line strategy. White dig s in and surrounds his king with defenders. 19 ...l:tae8 20 'ii'd 2 'ife7 I can't do this with pieces alone and need to begin a pawn storm, so the queen retreats and clears the way for ... g s . 21 g31? Interesting. He beefs up control of f4 at the cost of weakening his king and the f3square. The alternative is to go for a queenside or central plan : 2 1 a3 g S 2 2 ds l'Des 2 3 dxc6 bxc6 24 l:ted1 l'Dd3 25 b4 cs 26 l'DC3 l'Dxb2 27 'ifxb2 ..tes 28 'ifc2 f4 29 l'Dds 'ii'e 6 and .. .f3 soon arrives with great force. 21 gs Obviously dangerous due to White's potential on the a1-h 8 diagonal, but there is also danger to his king. •••

255


Question: Why play ... g s now when you rejected it on your sixth move? Answer: You underestim ate the power of redemption. Just because one m ade a poor decision earlier in the game doesn't mean one is fated to repeat the same mistake in the present. ... g s is thematic, and honestly, I didn't see how else to conduct the attack. 22 � h1 .itg6 f3-square, here I come! 2 3 l'll h 2 �h7 A good precaution to get my king off the g-file. I expose my own king in the line 2 3 ... .th s 24 �g 2 .ltxe2 25 'ii'x e2 f4 2 6 exf4 gxf4 27 gxf4 l:txf4 2 8 �h l. 24 llg1 llf7 2 5 llaf1 l:tef8 26 .ltc1 There is not even a pretext of queenside or central counterplay! White's goal/obsession is to prevent .. .f4, avoid loss and still get his lift home! 26 ...l'llf6 Since White m akes no effort for queenside or central play, Black has all day. The knight m ay head for h s . 27 'ii'e 1

256

4 e 3 L in e s a n d 3 tD c3 dxc4

Exercise {planning): We often find ourselves at such impasses. We are aware that we have an excellent position, but they don't win themselves unless the opponent goes bonkers. In thi s case it is clear White sits and waits. So how to make progress? Try to create a concrete plan for Black.

Answer: The key to entry lies in the light squares. Step 1: We target h3 and make White nervous about .. .f4 breaks. 27 ...'ii'd 71 28 'ii'f2 Step 2: Before we attempt a successful .. .f4 we need to create a diversion on the queen side, where White's entire army is AWOL. 2s ... bs1

25 7


Question: What do you m ean by "we"? You are the one playing Black. Answer: I was using the royal "we ! " Seriously, when you analyse such situation s, always imagine that you are playing one side and trying to solve a problem in a tournament set ting. Inserting yourself into the chess book you read magically increases your concentra tion . 29 .i.d2 Naturally we would love 29 c5? which hands over the d5-square to our knight. 29 a6 30 'i6'g2 ttJhs 31 l:tf2 Breaking up Black's roller with 3 1 g4 fxg4 32 hxg4 ttJf6 would leave White worrying about tricks on g4. 31 .. .'ili'e6! Increasing the diversionary pressure on the queen side. 32 l:tc1? Yet another concession . Instead, he should just give up the d5-square with 32 c5. Step 3 : Strike with the .. .f4 break. Now, with his rook on c1 missing out on the action, the timing is right: 32 f4! ...

•.•

33 gxf4 gxf4 34 'ifg4?! White puts up more resistance if he follows the principle of meeting a wing attack with a central counter: 34 d5 ! cxd5 3 5 cxd5 'ifxd5 36 ttJxf4 ttJxf4 37 exf4 .i.xf4 38 .i.xf4 :txf4 39 l:k7+ l:!.8f7 40 l:txf7+ 'ifxf7 41 l::t xf4 'ifxf4 and ... e3 follows soon, but White can still hope that Black gets careless and allows a perpetual at some point. 34 .'ii'e8 A shocking moment. Possibly for the very first time in my life I bravely decline a trade ! 3 5 tDc3 Both 35 c5 .i.C7 36 l::t g 1 l::t g 7 and 35 ttJfl f3 are also hopeless for White. ..

258

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 tb c 3 dxc4

Exercise: Black to play and trap White's queen.

Answer: 3s ... tbg3+ 36 �g1 .i.hs 37 'ifh4 .i.e7 0-1 Strangely enough, the queen is caught in the open board. Summary

The good news is th at all of White's sixth-move options (except for 6 tbh4!) give Black easy equality. Now on to the bad news: Next game we examine 6 tbh4! where we m ay have to sweat it out for a while to try to achieve equality.

Game34 V.Topalov-V.Kramnik

World Cha m pions h i p Playoff (ra pid), E l ista 2006 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 !Df3 !Df6 4 e3 .i.fs 5 tbc3 e6 6 tbh4! This move proves to be a big headache for Black. White is satisfied with the bishop pair and hopes to later open the position.

259


6 ... i.g6 In my opinion, the best move in the position. Question: Thi s seems submissive. Shouldn 't Black m ake White weaken first by playin g his bishop to e4 or g4?

-----

-------

Answer: Be careful . One person's weakening i s another's expansion ! Let's look: a) 6 ... i.e4 7 f3 i.g6 8 g 3 i.e7 9 a3 l2Jbd7 10 l2Jxg6 hxg6 11 f4! l2Je4 12 l2Jxe4 dxe4 13 b4 fS 14 'ii'h 3 �7 1 5 i.d2 b6 16 i.c3 cs 17 l::t d 1 'ii'C 7 18 i.e2 g S 19 dS and the game opens in White's favour, H . N akamura-J. De Jong, Ohrid 2009. b) After 6 ... i.g4 7 'ii'b 3 'ii'b 6 8 h3 i.h s 9 g4 i.g6 10 l2Jxg 6 hxg6 11 i.g2 l2Jbd7 12 i.d2 White's kingside expansion clearly benefits him. His territorial advantage and bishop pair make life tough for Black. 7 i.e21

260

4 e 3 L i n es a n d 3 ltJ c 3 dxc4

White cleverly waits for Black to castle before he grabs the bishop on g6, denying Black's rook use of the h -file. White also has a few reasonable alternatives, including: a) 7 ttJxg 6 hxg6 8 �d2 tiJbd7 9 1:tc1 a6 10 �d3 dxc4 11 �xc4 bS 12 �e2 cs 1 3 �f3 l:tb8 14 ttJe2 �d6 1 S g 3 o-o 16 o-o e s ! 17 dxcs ttJxcs 18 ..ib4, when Black's active cS-knight com pensates for White's bishop pair, G .Kasparov-F.Vallejo Pons, Lin ares 200S. b) 7 'ifb3 'ikc7 8 ttJxg 6 hxg6 9 �d2 ttJbd7 10 cxds exds 11 o-o-o as with counterplay, I .Cheparinov-A.Grischuk, Sochi 2008. 7 ...ttJ bd7 8 0-0 �d6 The m ain choice here, but it leaves me unimpressed with Black's position. I am also not a fan of 8 ... �e7. For example, 9 g3 0-0 10 ttJxg6 hxg6 11 'Wc2 l:te8 12 1:td1 �f8 13 b3 'ikc7 14 �b2 l:tac8 1S l:tac1 a6 16 �f3 and White can open the centre at his lei sure to exploit his bishop pair, V.Tkachiev-R.Ovetchkin, Sochi 2007. Next game we examine a hidden and dynamic option : 8 ...ltJe4!. 9 g3

9 . dxc41? A new move at the time. Black frees his position somewhat at the cost of handing White a larger share of the centre. 9 ... 0-0 10 ttJxg 6 hxg6 11 fkc2 dxc4 12 �xc4 cs 13 dxcs �xes 14 1:td1 l:tc8 1S �f1 �b4 16 �d2 ttJes 17 �g 2 'ifb6 18 'ifb3 ltJc4 19 �e1 left White with a nagging pull due to his two bishops in an open position in V.Kramnik-B.Gelfand, Monte Carlo (blindfold) 2007. 10 ..ixc4 tiJb6 ..

Question: Shouldn't Black play 10 ... ..ih s to preserve his bishop pair? Answer: Kramnik, like most Slav players, isn't fearful of handing over the bishop pair (maybe we should be after seeing this game!). Perhaps you are right, but even then Topalov would probably respond with 11 f3 and the bishop isn't so hot on h s . 1 1 �e2 o-o 12 ttJxg6

261


Now that Black has castled, it is time to swap. 12 ... hxg6 13 e4 e5 14 f41 As always Topalov's car, with a broken reverse gear, only drives forward! He takes con trol of central space and opens the game for his bishops. 14 ...exd4 15 'ii'x d4 'ii'e 7 16 �g2 .i.c5 17 'Wd3 l:tad8 18 'ii'c 2

Exercise: Come up with a plan to conjure counterplay for Black.

Things look ominous for Black, but let's assess: 1. White's central and king side pawn majority is ready to roll forward to attack. 2. The position has opened somewhat due to Kramnik's risky 9th move. 3. Black lures White's e-pawn forward and hopes to create gaps for his knights to rest. 4. White's undeveloped bishop on c1 is a problem. s. Black leads in development.

Answer: 18 ... ..id4! A key central counter. Kramnik prepares to inflict damage to White's pawn structure and also induces the e-pawn forward at the cost of another bishop-for-knight swap. 19 e5 Everyone knew Topalov would play this move. There is no point holding back from this committal move since Black looks okay after 19 ..if3 ..ixc3 20 bxc3 l:tfe8 2 1 l:.e1 lLJc4. 19 ... lLJfd 5 20 l:tf3 Covering e3. 20 lLJxc3 21 bxc3 White doesn't mind breaking up his pawns. His c-pawn may later eject a bl ack piece from ds. 21 ... i.c5 22 i.d2 l:td7 2 3 .1:te1 .Ufd8 24 .i.d3 'ii'e6 2 5 ..ic1 Threatening to open the position with fs . ..•

262

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 tb c3 dxc4

25 f51 A static structure favours the knight over White's bishops. Kramnik's move plugs up the works for a while, but it isn't a permanent solution . 26 "We2 �f8 2 7 l1d11 •••

Question: Why would White voluntarily enter into a pin ? Answer: While watching the game live over the Internet Chess Club, I found Topa's moves and decisions totally inexplicable and I asked myself the same question. Somehow, almost by witchcraft, he gets his attack going with his pinned bishop participating ! 27 "We7 28 h4 �d 5 29 "ii'c 21? A courageous move, loading up on fS . I would have panicked and relieved the pin with 29 .ic2 almost without thinking. 29 tZJc4 30 �h1 Continuing his bal ancing act. Now hs is in the air. 30 tiJa3 31 "We2! White accompli shes nothing if he hands back the bishop pair with 3 1 .i.xa3. Opposite coloured bishops often favour the attacker - but not here! 31 ... .i.xa3 32 hS gxh S 33 l:l.xh s g6 34 lth 8+ �g 7 3 5 �xd8 "Wxd8 is fine for Black. 31 "ii'd 7 I thought here that Topa had lost the thread and was getting outplayed. I was wrong ! 32 l:l.d11? Remarkable. He re-pins himself. I was certain the game would go 3 2 e6 "Wd6 3 3 .l:le1 bS 34 hS �e7 ! with decent chances for Black. 32 b5 At thi s moment I was thinking: 1. Topalov's pieces looked clumsy and ineffective; 2. His attack was going nowhere; and .••

•.•

.••

•••

..•

263


3. He was tied up in an unbreakable pin on the d-file. Conclusion : Topa was toast!

3 3 g4! Oops ! What I really meant to say was: A toast to Topa! Thi s move changes everything. Topalov attempts the impossible and attacks with half his army tangled up in a pin . Somehow he pulls it off! I had totally misassessed the situa tion and underestim ated White's attack. The actual evaluation of the position is even ! 3 3 ...fxg4 34 l:tg3 'lt;eJ? The losing move. Kramnik logically insists on keeping the pin, but fS arrives like a wrecking ball. 34 .. .'ife6! should lead to a draw after 35 l:tfl ! . Freedom from the tyranny of pindom ! Here 3 S ... lDc4 3 6 fS 'ifxes 3 7 'ifxg4! l:lxd3 3 8 fxg6+ We8 39 l:lxd3 l:txd3 40 'ifc8+ l:td8 41 'ifxc6+ litd7 42 'ifc8+ is perpetual check. 35 f51

264

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 liJc3 dxc4

Alekhine once said of a game where Capa destroyed him : " Pl aying loosely, he found one blow after another." Topalov, like Mad Max, seems most in his element when the world is in a muddle and mobocracy reigns. 3 5 gxf5 36 �g5+ WeB 3 7 e6 Releasing the pressure with the greedy 37 �xd8? 'iix d8 would be stupid. White would then be fighting for the draw. 3 7 ...'iid 6 3 7 ... 'iic 7 fares no better, as 38 :txg4! ! wins: a) 3 8 .. J:txd3 39 1hd3 �xd3 40 'iix d3 fxg4 41 'iig 6+ Wf8 42 'iih 7 ! and Black is defenceless. b) 3 8 .. .fxg4 39 �g6+ Wf8 40 l:xds ::txds 41 e7+ �xe7 and here 42 'iie 6 ! ! m ates. Returning to the position after 3 7 ...'iid 6: •..

Exercise (multiple choice}: White has a hidden path to victory. The choices are: a) 3 8 e7; b) 3 8 l:lxg4; c) 3 8 .i.xfs. Which m ove win s ?

Answer: 38 �xfs l ! The barbarian horde breaches Black's defensive barrier. There i s no better word in the English language than "barbarian" to describe how Topalov plays chess. Watching the game live, my mind was totally blown by this point. I 'm afraid this move calls for a heavy quote. Kierkegaard wrote: "Geniuses are like thunderstorm s. They go against the wind, terrify people, clean se the air! " 38 ...�xd1 There is nothing better. 39 �g6+ Wf8 40 e7+ The deadly point to his combination. Black must hand over his queen to stay alive for the moment. 40 .'iix e7 41 �xe7+ i.xe7 42 �d3 ! ..

2 65


This interference move messes with Black even more. It is clear there is no governing authority in charge on Black's side. Anarchy ensues and it's every black piece for itself! On the other hand, 42 'iWe6?? would be a bit hasty since 42 ... l:t8d2+ m ates next move. 42 ... l:ta1 I can 't imagine Black creating a fortress in the line 42 .. .l:hxd3 43 l:txd3 J:.xd3 44 'iWxd3 .i.xh4 45 'iWd6+ .i.e7 46 'iWxc6 �7 but perhaps this was the path of greatest resistance. 43 'iWb2 �dl 44 'iWe2 Vengeance is n ature's sweetest narcotic. Topalov lost the World Championship title to Kramnik in this acrimonious "toiletgate" m atch, but as some consolation he inflicted this amazing victory and al so enjoyed a game of cat-and-mouse with his great opponent, whom he loathes. 44...�a1 45 'iWxg4 �xa2+ 46 �h3 �f6 47 'iWe6 l:.d2 47 .. .ltJC4? 48 .i.g6 wins immediately. 48 .i.g6 .l:.2d7

266

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 t0 c 3 dxc4

Exercise: Find a plan to end Black's resistance.

___.

_ _ _ _

Answer: 49 l:tf3 1 There is no defence to the h-pawn's march down to h8. The trouble is 49 ... l:.e7 loses to so l:txf6+. 49 ... b4 50 h 5 1 1-0 The finish could be so ... bxc3 51 h6 c2 52 h7 cl'ii' 53 h 8 R ! mate. Always underpromote ! Summary

No, 6 0Jh4! is not a forced loss for Black. Please proceed in an orderly manner to our next game to see why.

Game 35 E.lnarkiev-A.Shirov

Poi kovsky 2008 1 d4 dS 2 0Jf3 c6 3 c4 0Jf6 4 e3 i.fs 5 0Jc3 e6 6 0Jh4 i.g6 7 i.e2 0Jbd7 8 o-o 0Je41

I like this virtually unknown, aggressive move that actually achieves a plus score for Black. Shirov's mission : He doesn't wait around while White decides the proper time to ex change on g6, and forces matters. 9 g3 9 0Jxg 6 ? ! hxg6 looks premature, allowing Black chances down the h-file. The game T.Nyback-R. Leitao, Khanty Man siysk Olympiad 2010, continued 10 cxds exds 11 0Jxe4 dxe4 12 dS i.d6 13 h3 cs (Black is about to play ... tOe s and .. .fs or bring his queen to es) 14 i.b s a6 15 i.xd7+ 'it'xd7 16 f3 o-o 17 i.d2 .l:tfe8 and Black already stood better:

267


1. White's blockaded ds-pawn is a liability; and 2. Black enjoys a healthy queenside pawn m ajority. 9 .. .lbd61 This knight may l ater hover on fs, menacing sacs around White's king.

Question: Why doesn't White gain a tempo with 10 c S ? Answer: Black wants t o lead his knight t o f s anyway, s o it's not a gain o f a tempo i f you force the opponent into something he wants. Also, the general rule of such pawn struc tures is: It is in White's favour to maintain central tension. The moment White plays c4-c5, all the pressure on Black's dS-pawn dissolves. Black can then build for an ... es break. 10 b3 i-e7 11 ltJxg6 Question: It looks scary to open the h-file. Should White play 1 1 ltJg2 instead? Answer: All well and true that opening the h-file is dangerous for White. However, by playing 11 l2lg2 what has White accomplished? 1. He didn't get the bishop pair; and 2. He squandered four moves (lLlf3, ltJh4, g 3 and lLlg 2) to fianchetto a knight! 11 ... hxg6 Omission accomplished! Black got what he wanted, namely an open h-file while omit ting kingside castling. Black's attacking chances easily m ake up for White's bishop pair. In fact, as a london player, if given a choice, I would take Black.

268

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 lb c 3 dxc4

12 'ifc2 !Df6 Making it difficult for White to achieve an e4 central break. 13 :d1 'ifc7 14 .i.f1 o-o-ol?

Good judgment. Black i s willing to go opposite wings despite White's space advantage. Why? The x-factor (h-factor?) is the open h -file. 15 .t g 2 ?1 You m ay not believe me but this move leads to a downward spiral for White. It took four moves to fianchetto thi s guy (.i.e2, g 3 , .i.f1 and .i.g 2).

Question: What happens if White goes for it immediately with 15 c s ? Answer: I think that is exactly what he should have played. White has no time to goof around. Let's see. 1 S ... !Dfs 16 b4 !bg4! 17 h 3 !Dgxe 3 ! 18 fxe3 'ifxg 3 + 19 'ii'g 2 :xh 3 20 !De2 'ii'x g 2+ 21 .txg 2 l:th4 with three pawns for the piece and approximately balanced chances.

2 69


1s J:th s Sending up a trial balloon . ••

Question: Why n ot win a pawn with 1S . . dxc4? .

�-----

------

Answer: You shouldn't even consider such a move ! Black sell s out his entire position for just one pawn . After 16 e4 t'Dfe8 17 �e3 'it>b8 18 t'De2 cxb3 19 �xb3 White enjoys: 1. A huge, mobile pawn centre; 2. Open freeways along the b- and c-files for his major pieces; 3. The barrels of both bishops aiming at Black's king; and 4. A m assive attack to follow. 16 cs t'Dfs 17 h3 Threatening g4. 17 ...l!dh8! I said "threatening g4", didn 't I ? 18 e4 Following the principle of meeting a wing attack with a central counter. 18 g4? ! allows 18 ... l:txh 3 ! 19 gxfs 'ifh 2+ 20 'it>f1 gxfs which gives Black a blistering attack similar to the game continuation . 18 ... dxe4 19 i.f4

Exercise: Here Black was so focused on his attack that he missed a trick. Black to play and win a pawn.

19 ...�d8 Answer: The normal reaction when our queen is attacked is to immediately move it. In this case Black missed 19 ... t'Dxd4! 20 Ilxd4 e s 2 1 t'Dxe4 exf4 2 2 t'Dd6+ �xd6 2 3 cxd6 �d7 24 llxf4 (White gets clobbered after 24 gxf4? l::t xh 3) 24 ...�xd6, with an extra pawn . 2 70

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 lt:J c 3 dxc4

20 g4? The temptation is overwhelming and White finally succumbs, seriously underestim at ing the force of Black's attack. 20 lt:Jxe4 lt:Jds wasn't very tempting for White but had to be played. Also White should almost certainly have played 19 lt:Jxe4 a move earlier instead of 19 .if4.

20 ...l:txh3 1 21 gxfs If 21 .ixh 3 then 21 ... lt:Jxd4 ! ! 22 .:xd4 'it'xd4. Now if White tries 23 .ig2? (23 'it>g 2 'it'xcs is forced, and still good for Black) there follows 2 3 ... lt:Jds ! 24 .id2 .ixcs 2 5 .ie1 e 3 with a win ning attack. 21 ...l:.xc31? Shirov takes a second bite out of the apple. He wants dS for his knight. Black had a couple of tempting alternatives: a) 21 ... gxf5 22 .ixh 3 :xh 3 and ... 'it'h8 is coming; b) 2 1 ... lit3h4 2 2 .ies gxfs. In both cases Black gets full compensation for his invested material . 22 'it'xc3 lt:Jd s 2 3 'it'c1 gxfs A full rook for only three pawns. What is so remarkable is the slow, laissez-unfair atti tude on Shirov's part. He doesn't seem to be in any hurry at all. 24 'it>f1 Understandably, White's king feels increasing discomfort hanging around the kingside, like a tourist who accidentally wanders into a dangerous and unfamiliar high-crime neighbourhood. 24 ...l:th4 25 .ies 'it'hB

2 71


26 -.ti>e1 This fails, as does everything else. For example: a) 26 'oti>g 1 :g4 27 1i'a3 i.f6 ! 2 8 i.g 3 a6 29 i.d6 f4 30 'oti>f1 l:txg 2 3 1 'oti>xg 2 f3+ 3 2 'oti>g 1 1i'h 3 m ates. b) 26 b4 :th 1+! 27 'oti>e2 'ii'h s+ wins. 26...:g4 27 i.f1 :g1 28 1i'c4 1i' h4 ... ltJe3 is in the air. 29 'oti>e2 i. gs 30 .:db1 Somehow one senses that White's "attack" with b4 and bs could be a wee bit slow in thi s situation ! 30 ...f4 Nitpicky as always, Rybka frowns upon this m ove and claims m ate in 11 after 30 ...1i'g4+. 31 .:tb2 f3+ 32 'oti>d1 e31

Rybka assessment: - 3 3 . 3 6 ! I have never seen an assessment thi s lopsided and initially 2 72

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 l'D c3 dxc4

thought Rybka had gone m ad. On top of everything, Black is down a rook. Perhaps it is time for the math police to step in and stop thi s game! Kasparov once impolitely referred to Shirov as "a talented amateur". In thi s gam e Shi rov's chess skill s look pretty profession al to me. 33 �e1 e2 34 l:.xe2

Exercise: Find the most efficient way to finish White off.

Answer: 34 .. .llxf1+1 0-1 It's m ate next move. Summary

8 ... l'De4! looks like a very good way to meet one of White's most dangerous Slav continua tions.

Game36 A.Morozevich-V.lvanchuk

Wij k a a n Zee 2009 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 l'Dc3 We also reach our position through the move order 3 e3 t'Df6 4 l'Dc3 a6. 3 ...l'Df6 We look at the option 3 ... dxc4 ! ? in G am e 38. 4 e3

2 73


4 a6 Since we don't want to open the Pandora's Box of the Semi-Slav (4 ... e6) I suggest we try the Chebanenko Slav at thi s point. If I had recommended this line in a chess book ten years ago you would have thought I was nuts. But now the ... a6 Slav has turned m ain stream . It seems to be gaining in popularity each year and now finds itself in the arsenal of the Top 10 GMs in the world, with the exception of Radjabov. The good news is that we only need to study this one line with White's knight on c3 and White committed to playing e3. ...

Question: Why not stick with your beloved Reversed London by playing 4 ..tfs ? ...

Answer: It pains me to the core to say this but the Reversed London isn't playable in this exact move order. After 5 cxds! cxds 6 'iib 3 ! Black experiences difficulties defending both b7 and dS. He has several options but only the last one is playable:

2 74

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 tb c3 dxc4

a) 6 ... b6? is probably the worst of Black's choices. 7 ..tbS+ ..td7 8 t:Dxds e6 9 t:Dxf6+ 'ii'xf6 10 tbf3 left Black down a pawn and busted in G .Soppe-R.Herrera, Mendoza 2004. b) 6 ... 'ii'd 7? ! 7 tbf3 t:Dc6 8 t:Des ! 'i"c7 9 ..td2 e6 10 :c1 a6 11 tba4 ..td6 12 t:Dxc6 bxc6 1 3 'ii'b 6 ! 'it>d7 1 4 'ii'x c7+ 'it>xc7 1 5 ..tas+ 'it>b7 16 f3 tbd7 17 'it>f2 �hc8 18 b 4 with a clamp o n the queen side and the cs-square, G .Kasparov-E. Poliviou, Patras (simul) 2001. c) 6 ... 'ii'b 6? ! 7 t:Dxds is a free pawn. After 7 ...'ii'x b3 8 t:Dxf6+ exf6 9 axb3 Black doesn't have compensation. d) 6 ... ..tc8. This sorry looking retreat is Black's best ! 7 ..td3 e6 8 f4! and White gets a fa vourable Reversed Stonewall Dutch where he controls the key e4-square. After 8 ... t:Dc6 9 t:Df3 ..te7 10 0-0 h 6 11 t:De s ..td7 12 ..td2 b S 13 'ii'd 1 Black has not solved his most pressing need, which is how to defend his king against the coming attack on the king side, A.Dreev G. Biebinger, Bad Wiessee 1998. Let's return to 4 ... a6:

Question: I have a question about ... a6. What is the point? It almost looks l ike a random move ! Answer: I admit the move does look crazy, yet it contains the seed of many good possi bilities: 1. It prepares ... bs, challenging White on his c4 point. If White pushes to cs, this stabi lizes the centre which nearly always favours Black who then plays for an ... e s break. 2. If White exchanges pawns on ds, he gets a lame version of the Exchange Slav since his dark-squared bishop is stuck behind his pawn ch ain. 3. If White plays b3 he must be on high alert since it is Black who can break the tension in several ways on each move. 4. If White plays a4 to prevent ... bs, then White must also pay the price of weakening the b4-square. 5 t:Df3

2 75


The most non-committal move and the m ain line. White also has several alternatives: a) 5 'iic 2 �g4 (I like thi s move best; Black creates the annoying strategic threat ... �h S and ... �g6 to try to exploit White's early queen move) 6 h 3 �h s 7 cxds cxds 8 'iib 3 .:ta7 ! .

Nimzowitsch would approve. Thi s i s another nifty benefit o f the . . .a 6 Slav: i t opens a7 for Black's rook! And if you claim that the rook has been relegated to a subservient posi tion, then I reply that the rook i s no worse than White's queen on b3. What does it do there? S.Mamedyarov-V.Ivanchuk, Moscow 2008, continued 9 g4! ? �g6 10 gS tt::\fd7 11 tt::\x ds tt::\ c 6 ! ? (lvanchuk isn't satisfied with the mere regaining of his pawn with 11 ... e6 12 tt::\f4 'iix g s and instead opts to sac it for a big development lead) 12 tt::\f4 e s 13 tt::\ x g6 hxg6 and Black had plenty of compensation for the pawn due to White's loose structure and lag in development. b) 5 �d3 dxc4 ! . I prefer this move over s ... bs 6 b3 where White scores well. With s ... dxc4. Black transposes to a favourable and equal version of the Queen's Gambit Accepted. Slav players should not be dogmatic about sticking to pure Slav structures if a favourable transposition to a non-Slav line is available. For example, 6 �xc4 bs 7 �e2 (or 7 �d3 e6 8 tt::\f3 cs 9 0-0 �b7 10 'ii'e 2 tt::\b d7 11 .l:.d1 'iib 6 with a decent variation of the QGA for Black) 1 ... e6 8 tt::\f3 cs 9 0-0 �b7 10 b3 tt::\ c 6 virtually forcing White to exchange on cs since White ends up with an inferior isolani position if he maintains the central tension . After 11 dxcs �xes 12 �b2 0-0 13 'ii'x d8 .:tfxd8 Black m ay even have a microbe of an edge due to his ex tra queenside space, V.Kiselev-E .Bareev, Internet 2006. c) With 5 a4 White goes to great length s to prevent ... bs. In this case White i s willing to weaken b4 to achieve his aims. We play s ... e 6 ! .

2 76

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 ltJ c 3 dxc4

Question: Hold it right there! Earlier in the book you said we would avoid the Semi-Sl av. Aren't you now transposing to a Semi-Slav position ? Answer: Ah, but I also said we Slav players should be flexible. Here we agree to go into a Semi-Slav, but only on condition that the extra moves a4 and ... a6 are tossed in by each side. White weakens the b4-square by playing a4, while ... a6 is a very useful move for Black. Now 6 ltJf3 is an swered by 6 ... c s ! .

Yes. More of that flexibility stuff! Now w e offer t o go into a Queen's Gambit Declined Tarrasch a tempo down, where the extra tempo of a2-a4 harm s White m ore than it helps; or a favourable version of the Queen's Gambit Accepted: c1) 7 cxds leads to the QG D Tarrasch version : 7 ... exd5 8 ..te2 ltJc6 9 o-o ..td6 10 b3 cxd4 11 ttJxd4 ttJxd4 12 'Wxd4 'Wc7 ! (threatening both h2 and ... ..tes) 13 f4 ..tcs 14 'We s+ "fke7 was B.Gelfand-L.Van Wely, Monte Carlo (blindfold) 2002. White's weaknesses on b4, e3 and e4

2 77


give Black good counterplay. c2) 7 �d3 gets us to the QGA version. 7 ... dxc4 8 �xc4 tbc6 9 0-0 �e7 10 d5 tba5 11 �a2 exd5 12 tbxd5 �e6 ! 13 tbxe7 'ii'x d1 14 llxd1 �xe7 was A.Karpov-G . Kasparov, Zurich (blitz) 2006, where Black's control over the queen side light squares and centralized king m ay even give him the edge in the ending. There's al so the more typical 10 'ii'e 2, and here 10 ... cxd4 11 l:td1 e5 12 exd4 exd4 13 tbxd4 tbxd4 14 'ii'e 5 'ii'd 6 15 'ii'xd4 'ii'xd4 16 l:txd4 is a well-known and equal queen less middlegame. In this line Black can also choose to play the IQP position with 11 ... 0-0 12 exd4. d) On 5 b3 we play 5 ... �f5 and go into a Reversed London with the extra moves b3 and ... a6. This knocks out White's annoying 'ii'h 3 possibilities. After 6 tbf3 e6 7 �e2 Black plays 7 ... �b4!.

A m anoeuvre to remember: Black has no intention of staying on b4 and will soon re treat the bishop to d6.

Question: Doesn't this just hand White a tempo? Answer: Yes, but once again it's an undesirable tempo. White's bishop is forced to d2, but it's clearly misplaced there and belongs on b2. P.Nikolic-L.Van Wely, Dordrecht (blitz) 2000, continued 8 �d2 h 6 ! (accurate play: Black gives his bishop a cubby hole to hide on h7, eliminating tbh4 possibilities) 9 0-0 �d6 10 tbe5 tbbd7 11 f4. Here Van Wely upped the ante with 11 ... g 5 ! ?, but Black al so has a good position after 11 ... 'ii'e 7. s ... bs 6 b3 He decides to m aintain the central ten sion . Altern atively: a) White doesn't get anything if he steers into a version of the Exchange Slav, m ainly because his dark-squared bishop is stuck inside his pawn chain. For example, 6 cxd5 cxds 7 �d2 e6 8 �d3 tbbd7 9 o-o �b7 10 tbe2 (planning ft3 and �b4 to saddle Black with a bad bishop) 10 ... tbe4! (disrupting White's plan) 11 a4 b4 12 aS �d6 13 'ilr'a4 tbxd2 14 tbxd2 0-0

2 78

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 tiJ c3 dxc4

1 5 f4 'il'e7 16 tiJf3 l1fc8 17 ttJe s tiJf6 with mutual chances, M.Gurevich-E.Bareev, German League 1992; b) 6 cs, grabbing queenside space, is a popular option . Here 6 ... g 6 i s a logical move now that White has committed to cs, and Black hurries to prepare the ... e s break. For example:

b1) 7 �d3 �g4 8 h 3 �xf3 9 'it'xf3 �g7 10 g4! ? e s 11 'it'g 3 tiJfd7 12 tiJe2 'it'e7 13 0-0 h s 14 f3 tiJf8 1 5 a4 b4 16 �d2 as 17 e4! ? dxe4 18 �xe4 tiJe6 was P.Svidler-V.Malakhov, Khanty Mansiysk 2009. All hell has broken loose in the centre, and Rybka evaluates it as even. b2) 7 ttJes, followed by f2-f4, prevents ... e s but leads to more closed positions. For example, 7 ... �g7 8 f4 0-0 9 �e2 �e6 10 0-0 liJe4 11 a4 f6 12 tiJd3 tiJd7 1 3 liJb4 ikc7 14 tiJxe4 dxe4 15 i.d2 fs 16 'iic 2 tiJf6 17 .l:ta3 'iib 7 18 axbs axbs with an equal position, F.Caruana-P.Svidler, Am sterdam 2009. 6 �g4 We are happy to rid ourselves of this bishop because most of our pawns are stuck on light squares. ...

2 79


7 � d2 Caution i s not a trait one normally associates with Morozevich ! White worries about pin tricks on the c3-knight and covers them at the cost of misplacing his bishop on d2. The m ain choice here is 7 i.. e 2 e6. For example: a) 8 h 3 i..h s 9 g4 i.. g 6 10 ltJes liJfd7 11 ltJxg6 hxg6 12 'it'c2 i.. e 7 1 3 i..b 2 liJf6 was V.Topalov-Wang Vue, Nanjing 2009. Objectively White must stand better with his bishop pair. However, we Slavocratic m embers of the chess world wouldn't mind taking Black. b) 8 o-o ltJbd7 9 i..b 2 i.. d 6 10 h3 �h s 11 ltJe5 i.. x e2 12 ltJxe2 bxc4 (Black wants to liqui date) 13 bxc4 0-0 14 liJxd7 'iVxd7 1 5 'iVa4 l:tfb8 16 i.. a 3 i.. x a3 17 'it'xa3 dxc4 18 :fcl 'it'd5 19 ltJf4 'it'bs 20 'ii'c 3 c5 with an equal position, Bu Xiangzhi-Ni Hua, JinZhou 2009. Next game we look at 7 h3 i.. xf3 8 'iVxf3 e s ! ?. 7 e6 8 h3 ...

Question: Should we try 8 ...�h s to provoke 9 g4? Answer: Thi s is one of those intuitive points in the Slav which i s very difficult to gauge, and seems to ch ange from game to game. Sometimes Black can liven up the position by provoking g4 from White, but in some cases, like thi s one, g4 becomes a useful means of gaining space and attacking chances for White. Let's look at an example: 9 ... i.. g 6 10 ltJes i.. d 6 11 h4 dxc4 (I don't like Black's position much after 11 ... b4 12 ltJa4 i.. x es 13 dxes ltJe4 14 h5 ltJxd2 15 'it'xd2 i.. e 4 16 .l:th 3) 12 ltJxg6 hxg6 13 bxc4 bxc4 14 i.. x c4 ltJbd7 15 g 5 ltJd5 16 ltJe4 i.e? 17 .:tel, P.Tregubov-A.Iljushin, Moscow 2010. White's space and bishop pair give him the advantage in wh at is, admittedly, still a complex affair. 9 �xf3 9 'iVxf3 i.a3 1 lvanchuk i s possibly the most original strategic thinker alive today. H i s unconventional last move cleverly prevents White from engaging on the queenside with a4, and keeps White vigilant about a potential ... i..b 2. ...

280

4 e 3 L i n es a n d 3 li:J c 3 dxc4

10 .i.d3 0-0 Question: Can White play 11 e4 now? Answer: Be careful to check the opponent's threats. 11 e4 drops a pawn to 11 ... dxc4! fol lowed by ... 'iWxd4. 11 o-o !Dbd7 12 l:.ad1 If White breaks with 12 e4, Black counters swiftly with 12 ... e s ! . After 1 3 exds exd4 14 !De4 cxds 1 5 !Dxf6+ 'iWxf6 16 'iWh s g 6 17 'iWxdS !Des Black's knight and bishop stand their ground well against White's bishops. 12 J:tc8 13 'iie 2 l:te8 Trying to take advantage of White's queen position on e2. Any e4 by White will be met with ... e s ! . 14 cs .i.b4 15 a 3 ! ••

281


Exercise: Should we take the pawn, back up to as or take the knight?

1S ... i.xc3! Answer: A radical yet strong decision. Black's knights stand their ground against the feared bishop pair. After 1S ... i.xa3 ? ! 16 tt'lb1 b4 17 tt'lxa3 bxa3 18 .l:.a1 es 19 'if'd1, eventually White picks off one or possibly both of Black's a-pawns. 1S ... ..tas ? ! is passive. After 16 b4 i.c7 17 f4 White stands better with : 1. Control over e4; 2. Extra space; and 3 . Attacking chances on the kingside. 16 i.xc3 es 17 dxes Black stands well if allowed ... e4. 11 ... tt'lxes 18 i.fs .l:.a8 19 i.d4 'if'e7 The gut in stinct for most would be to declare a White plus based on the pair of bishops versus Black's knights. Being a knight-loving Slav guy, I would like to point out that Black's centralized knights also look good and the e4 break may come at a high cost for White. 20 i. b1 a s ! Idea: . . .a4, which open s c 4 t o Black's knight. 21 'if'b2 a4 22 f41

Wow! Strategically risky to say the least, but the only move to keep the dynamic poten tial in the position . White cedes control over e4 in order to eject the powerful es-knight and roll forward with a potential of a kingside pawn storm. The trouble for White i s that his alternatives aren't full of promise: a) 2 2 b4 tt'lc4 hands over c4, a big square for the knight. b) 22 i.xes 'if'xe s 23 'if'xe s .:.xes 24 b4 is dull and equal. Sometimes your least bad choice deserves an exclam ! 282

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 liJ c 3 dxc4

22 ...liJed7 23 b4 'ii'fB In order to play ... liJe4 without allowing White into g7. 24 g4 Here he comes! 24...liJe4 2 5 gs fs l

Another strong strategic decision by lvanchuk. His last move allows White to open the g-file, and also open the position more for his bishops. However, lvanchuk realizes that if he waits around then White leisurely builds up his attack. So he strikes now and creates a confrontation on his term s. 26 gxf6 liJdxf6 The d7-knight, sidelined for so long, finally sees action. 27 \t>h2 g61 Fantastic positional understanding ! lvanchuk plays what looks like an amateurish weakening move, but he wants to play ... g6 before White plays fs (see below).

283


28 l:tg1 Question: Why doesn't White try to crack open the kings ide with 2 8 fS ? Answer: Black has no intention of allowing White to open the game. He would have re sponded with 28 ... g s !, the point of his 27th move. After 29 l:.g 1 'Wh6 Black would follow up with ... �f7, .. JigS and ... g4, and it is he who is attacking . 2 8 .. .'�f71 Hoping to soon put White under attack with ....'Wh 6. 29 'i'g2 'i'h6 30 l:tdf1 'i'h s 3 1 'i'b2 lla7 3 2 ngs ! Creating a roadblock o n g S ! Moro hopes t o set up fS without allowing Black the bypass move ... g s . 32 ...'i'h4 3 3 'i'g2

Exercise: Find a plan for Black. What i s the best arrangement for his pieces?

33 ...nae7?1 Answer: Not thi s ! Black should play 3 3 ... �8 ! intending ... nf7 ! and ... lbxg s. Undoubtedly Moro would have gone ballistic with 34 fs ! ? 'i'xg S 3 5 'i'xg s lbxg s 36 fxg6 hxg6 37 i.xg6. Black is up an entire rook but has a lot of loose pieces hanging. The correct result of the game should probably be a draw after 37 ... lbge4 38 i.xf6 ne6 39 i.d4+ �g 8 40 ng 1 �f8 41 l:tfl+ �g 8. 34 i.c2 34 fS comes close for White but still should lead to a draw after, for example, 34 ... 'i'xg s 3 5 'i'xg s lbxg s 3 6 fxg6+ �g 8 3 7 i.xf6 llf8 3 8 llf4 llxe3 39 i.xg s l:te2+ 40 �g 3 hxg6 41 i.xg 6 l:.e3+ 42 �g 2 llxf4 43 i.xf4 nxa3 44 i.e8 l:ld3 45 i.xc6 a3 46 i.xbs a2 47 i.es .ne3 48 i.a1 ne1 49 i.c3 l:le3 SO i.a1. White should probably enter this line since Black stands bet ter after his next move. 284

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 li::J c3 dxc4

Now he sees the correct idea, opening f7 for his rook. 3 5 .:tes llf7 36 !lxe8+ �xeS 3 7 fs?l White begins to overpress. Advising Moro to control him self and avoid attackin g i s a bit like putting Jack the Ripper in charge of a murder investigation. He can 't help himself: more murders are sure to follow! 37 ... g5 38 .txe4?1 If you use too strong a solvent it eats away at the dirt and also the floor. Moro overre acts and his position begins to seriously deteriorate. 38 ... li::Jxe4 39 f6 h 5 1 Black's advantages: 1 The powerful knight and queen duo dominate. 2. His king is safe. 3. White's king i sn't! 4 White's f6 passer i s blockaded while Black's kingside m ajority i s m obile and surges forward. 40 llf41? What the hell ... ? Of all the sneaky, conniving tricks! Moro hops a ride on the crazy train and man ages to confuse the conductor! He has a genius for the swindle which even Bernie Madoff would envy. I have played him several times over the ICC (I mean Moro, not Mad off), normally getting good, and sometimes even winning positions, only to be swindled 90% of the time by some shady computer shot like this.

285


Exercise: Black obviously has two possible paths. Take the rook with 4Q . gxf4 or block with 40 ... g4. One of them wins, while the other draws. Can you see your way clearly through the Mora-induced fog ? ..

40 ... gxf4? Answer: Black should win with 40 ... g4! 41 l:lxe4+ (if White does nothing and plays 41 llfs then 41 ...l:lh7 ! 42 %U4 'iti17 ! 43 �fs llh6 ! 44 l:tf4 l:tg6! wins) 41 ... dxe4 42 'it'xe4+ d7 43 'ii'fS+ d8 44 'ii'f4 c8 45 'it'fs+ b8 46 'it'es+ b7 (finally escaping the checks) 47 'ii'g 3 'it'g s. 41 'it'g8+ l:tf8 42 'it'e6+ d8 43 'ii'e 7+ c8 44 'it'xf8+

Exercise (multiple choice}: Black has one path to the draw and two which send him over the cliff: a) 44 . �b7; b) 44 ...�c7; c) 44 .. .'�d7. Think carefully! .

286

.

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 lb c3 dxc4

44. . /.t>d7?? Welcome to my world. This is exactly how 100% of my blitz disasters against Moro end. Answer: 44 .. .'itc7?? makes no sense since it allows White's bishop into the attack: 45 i.eS+ �d7 46 'ili'e7+ �cS 47 'ikc7 m ate. Only 44 ... �b7 ! saves Black. Here 45 'ii'f7+ �a6 46 'iig S (threatening m ate on aS) 46 ... �b7! 47 f7 f3 ! 4S fS'ik 'ikf2+ 49 �h 1 'ikfl+ so �h 2 (50 'ikg l?? allows so ... liJf2+ 51 �h 2 'iixh 3 m ate) so ... 'ikf2+ is a rather cool perpetual check. 45 'iie 7+ 1-0

Exercise: Try to work it out to m ate without m oving the pieces.

'--�-

Answer: 4S ... �cS 46 'ikeS+ �b7 47 'iid 7+ �aS 4S 'iix c6+ �a7 49 'iic 7+ �aS so 'ikcS+ �a7 51 c6+ ttJcs 52 i.xcs mate. If you m ade it to the end, congratulations - that's 14-ply! Summary

The ... a6 Chebanenko Slav m ay be a good choice for you when White plays the liJc3/e3 Slav lines. You only need to learn this one line of the ... a6 Slav and you're done !

Game37 W.So-Ni Hua

Olonga po City 2010 1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3 liJc3 liJf6 4 e3 a6 s liJf3 bs 6 b3 i.g4 7 h3 i.xf3 8 'ikxf3 es! S ... e6 9 i.d2 i.a3 transposes to the Morozevich-lvanchuk game we just looked at. S ... es is the dynamic option which involves a pawn sac.

287


Question: What are you getting me into? Black's sac looks fi shy and seem s to break a load of principles:

--------'

1. Black opens the position when behind in development. 2. Black opens the position when his opponent owns the bishop pair. 3. Black's pin trick with ... .ib4 looks like it's nullified by the simple .id2. Isn't Black just guilty of excessive zeal ? 4 . Lastly, I don 't like studying complicated book lines. I play by feel and subscribe t o the Pink Floyd philosophy from the song, The Wall: "We don't need no education ! " Answer: I t is clear both you and the band members of Pink Floyd desperately do need education since you employed a double negative. Even my grammar check caught it! Kierkegaard wrote: "The case with most men i s that they go out into life with one or another accidental characteristics of personality for which they say: Well, this is the way I am . I cannot do otherwise ! " If you put your mind to it you can indeed play the complicated 8 ... e s ! line, and play it well enough to take down your opponents. The current state of the ory in thi s position suggests th at it is indeed playable and the resulting positions are hor rifically complex. At club level, White generally lands in this position accidentally without having the slightest clue of theory. Remember, most of us are not destined to face Kramnik playing the White side. If you understand even a little bit of the theory the result is an al most certain 0-1! Clearly you must tinker with the alchemy of such position s in your home lab and get comfortable in the chaos. Soon the confusion disappears (for you!). Don't un derestimate yourself - study the line ! More good news: Black abruptly snatches the initia tive and the coming moves are not easy for White. Watch ... 9 dxes

Question: Who says my opponent will accept? What if he declines? Answer: White gets nothing if he chickens out and declines the sac. For example: 288

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 ti:J c3 dxc4

a) 9 cs ti:Jbd7 10 .ie2 g6! (placing the bishop on a better diagonal where it covers e s and hits d4; this move also m akes Black's king safer) 11 o-o .ig7 12 .ib2 0-0 13 b4 as 14 a3 'irb8 1S 'ii'g 3 !te8 was V. Buli-L. Le Quang, Budapest 200S. Black i s not worse and m ay be the one with all the dynamic potential in the position. b) If 9 cxds? White gets all the difficulties of the acceptance version without the extra pawn : 9 ... .ib4 10 .id2 'ii'a s 11 ti:Jb1 (retro development is never a good sign, but after 11 l:c1 li:Jxds 12 li:Je4 o-o 13 dxes ti:Jd7 White lag s dangerously behind in development) 11 ... exd4 12 dxc6 o-o 13 c7 dxe 3 ! 14 fxe3 (14 'ii'x a8?? exd2+ 1S 'iit d 1 'ii'x c7 wins) 14 ... ti:Jbd7 and White is obviously in deep trouble, A.Zhuravlev-A. Rychagov, Smolensk 200S. 9 .ib4 ...

10 .id2 .ixc31 11 .ixc3 li:Je4 Our plan begins to take shape. If we m anage to run White's bishop off the as-e1 diago nal, a queen check on as destroys White. 12 .ib4 bxc4

2 89


A crucial position for the assessment of our pawn sac. We intend ...'ifb6 or ... cs. 13 'iig4 Alternatively: a) 13 e6 fxe6 14 bxc4 lLld7 lS cxds cxds 16 i.d3 .l:tb8 17 i.xe4 .l:txb4 18 'iih s + '>fi>f8 19 i.d3 with an unclear position that somehow reminds me of a French Defence, W.So V.Malakhov, Khanty Man siysk 2009. b) 13 i.xc4 'ifb6 14 a3 as lS i.d6 ttJxd6 16 exd6 o-o 17 i.e2 'iic s 18 o-o 'iix d6 with equality, Wang Yue-Ni Hua, JinZhou 2009. c) 13 bxc4 'ifb6 14 a3 as lS e6 l:ta7 ! ? 16 cxds cxds 17 ltcl ttJc6 and White's alarming lag in development induces him to sac a piece: 18 'iffs ttJxb4 19 exf7+? (19 .l:tc8+ draws) 19 ... '>t>e7? (19 ... .l:t.xf7 20 'iic 8+ '>t>e7 21 .Uc7+? '>t>d6 ! win s) 20 .ic4? was "masteryoda" C. Lakdawala, Internet 2010. Now I missed the instant winning shot 20 ... lLlc2+! 21 '>t>dl (21 '>ttl ttJxe3+! wins even quicker) 2 1 ...'ifb2 ! (threatening to take on e3 and m ate on d2) 22 .l:txc2 'ifb1+ 2 3 hlcl lLlc3+ 24 '>t>d2 'iixfs. 13 ... cs

14 f3 1 Question: Why wouldn't White take on g 7 with tempo? Answer: After 14 'iix g 7? White loses the initiative: 14 ....l:tf8 lS .l:td1 (the trouble is lS f3 ?? loses instantly to 1S ... 'iih 4+) 1 S ... 'ifb6 16 i.d2 c3 17 i.c1 c2 18 l:td3 c4! 19 l:txds 'ifh4+ 20 '>t>e2 lLlc3+ popped a rook in T.Hillarp Persson-l.lbragimov, Skelleftea 1999. 14...cxb4 Going for initiative over material . After 14 ... ttJc6 ! ? lS fxe4 ttJxb4 16 'ii'x g7 I:tf8 17 exds ! ? lLlc2+ 18 '>t>t2 ttJxal 19 i.xc4 ttJc2, a s in A.Shimanov-D.Lintchevski, Dagomys 2010, White enjoys plenty of compensation for the rook. However, White still faces one huge hurdle: he is down a rook! 15 fxe4 o-o

2 90

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 li:J c3 dxc4

Confused yet? Rybka assesses thi s zany position as equal !

16 exd s Question: What happens after 16 lldl? Answer: Thi s has never been tried. Black m ay continue with 16 ... li:Jc6. Have faith in Black's development lead. After 17 l:txds 'ike7 18 i.xc4 li:Jxe s 19 'ikf4 (he must cover Black's queen check on h4) 19 ...li:Jxc4 20 bxc4 l:tac8 2 1 l:td4 b 3 ! there's a double threat of capturing on a2 and checking on b4, and White struggles to equalize. 16 ...'ikxd s Or 16 ... cxb3 17 'ikd4 li:Jd7 18 axb3 'Wig s 19 �f2 as 20 i.e2 with a god-awful mess, Y.Shulman -V.Mal akhov, Khanty Man siysk Olympiad 2010. 17 i.xc4 'ikxes 18 o-o li:Jc6!

Let's assess:

291


1. We have a bishop-for-knight imbalance. The bishop is powerfully posted at c4, but the knight is no slouch either, heading for es. 2. White exerts pressure against f7. 3. Black has a target pawn to work over on e3. Conclusion : Either a microbe of an edge to White, or possibly dynamically bal anced. One bit of advice though: let's not get greedy. White gets an initiative for the pawn after 18 .. .'�xe3+?! 19 'iki>h 1 l:ta7 20 l:tae1 'ii'c s 2 1 J:tfs. 19 'ii'f3 'ii'c 7 20 'ii'e 41 lLle51

Question: I don't understand White's last move, or Black's last move for that m atter. Why didn 't Black just gain a tempo with 20 .. J:tae8? Answer: White set, and Black avoided, the trap 2 1 l:.xf7 ! ! winning on the spot. 21 l:tac1

21 ...'ii'b 81 21 ...'ii'e 7?? 22 l:txf7 ! would be an echo of the above trap. 22 .i.d s l:ta7 ! 23 l:tfs l:.e7 That powerhouse on e s secures Black's defences. 24 lies l:tfe8 25 'ii'f4 'ii'd 6! 26 'ii'd 4 26 'ii'x b4? walks into 26 ... g6 followed by a fork on d3 if White refuses to fork over the ex change on e S ! 26 'iti>h8 2 7 .i.c61 White tries to squeeze every ounce of initiative out of the position to make up for his slightly inferior structure. 27 'ii'x d4 28 exd4 lLlxc6 29 :txc6 g6 •••

•••

292

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 lb c3 dxc4

Exercise (multiple choice): How should White proceed? a) 30 l:tas going after Black's queen side pawns; b) 30 l:tf4 securing his d-pawn; or c) 30 l:tf2 covering his second rank.

30 �a 5? Answer: White decides to feed at the trough of Black's queenside pawn s but he begins to overpress and underestim ates Black's resources. 30 l:tf4! lta7 should lead to an eventual draw, and so should 30 l:tf2 l:td7 31 �xa6 l:te4 32 ds l:td4 33 .:taf6 �g7 34 l:t6f4 �d1+ 35 �h 2 �b7 36 �e2 �xds. 30...lte1+ 3 1 �h2 �8e2 32 l:taxa6 11d2 The point. Black achieves the all-important doubling on the 7th rank before his oppo nent. 33 l:tf6 If 3 3 lb7 �g 7 34 �cc7 �fl 3 5 l:tcb7 h s ! (threat: ... h4 and ... �d1 with a m atin g net) 36 h4 �xd4 3 7 �h 3 l:td3+ 3 8 �h 2 �f4 3 9 �d7 l:txh4+ 40 �g1 �xd7 41 �xd7 �f6 and Black should convert without much trouble. 33 ...�g7 34 11f4 fS!

293


Cutting off llg4 defensive ideas. 35 l:ta7+ 'itf6 36 l:tf3 After 36 l:xh7 l:tee2 37 lla7 l:txg 2+ 38 �h l l:th 2+ 39 �g l .l:txh 3 : 1 . White's king is cut off; 2. Black has two supported passers coming down the g- and f-files; and 3. White's pawns begin to drop. 36 ... .l:tee2 37 l:tg3 f4 38 l:tg4 f3 1 39 l:tf4+ �g5 40 l:lg4+ �f6 41 l:lf4+ �e61 No draw! The position still m ay be a draw, but now White must earn it. 42 lla6+ �d7 43 1137+ �c6 44 llxf3? White misses a huge opportunity. Black has no path to victory after 44 h4! l:r.xg 2+ 45 �h 3. 44...llxg2+ 45 �hl l:th2+ 46 �g1 l:ldg2+ 47 �fl l:tc2 48 �g1 lthg2+

I hate it when I am trapped in such undignified situations. White's king must jump around at Black's beck and call, defending m ates everywhere. It's like those old westerns 294

4 e 3 L i n e s a n d 3 li::J c3 dxc4

where the bad guy/bully/gun slinger walks into a bar, picks on a random customer and yells " Dance ! " Thi s is followed by the bad guy/bully/gun slinger firing a barrage of bullets perilously close to the customer's feet. The bullied customer has no choice but to prance about until the bully tires of his amusement! 49 'ittf1 l:.h2 50 'it>g1 'it>d 5 51 1tg3 l:thd2 52 'it>h1 lth2+ 5 3 ..t>g1 l1hd2 54 'it>h1 11xa2 55 l::td 7+ 'it>e41 Black's harried king survives the arduous trek through the desert to finally arrive at a peaceful oasis on the kingside. 56 l:txh7

Exercise: One senses there is a win for Black here. But where? Find the simplest path to victory.

Answer: 56 ...I:ta1+1 Paradoxically, Black swaps off one of his towering rooks for White's defensive turkey on g3. White's passive rook on g3 looks a lot like the dumbest kid in class being assigned a front row centre seat next to the teacher. Yet the g 3-rook serves a strong defensive func tion . With its removal, the b3-pawn soon falls and White will be helpless to halt its advance with only a single rook and no king to help out. 57 l:tg1 ltxg1+ 58 'it>xg1 ltd3 59 lld7 59 lth4+ 'it>ds 60 'it>f1 llxb3 6 1 'it>e2 l:.g 3 62 'it>d2 gS 63 l:.h 7 'it>xd4 64 'it>c2 .:.c3+ 65 'ifo>b2 'ifi>e4 66 l:tb7 l:txh 3 67 l:.xb4+ 'it>f3 wins for Black. White's king has been lured away from the kings ide. 59 ... ltxh3 60 d 5 llxb3 61 d6 'it'd 51 The winning difference i s the imbalance of power between the two kings.

295


62 'IW2 'ittc 6 63 l:td8 .Ud3 64 .l:f.c8+ 'ittd 7 But not 64 ... 'itt x d6?? 6 S l:.d8+ 'ittc s 66 .Uxd3. We have all done things like this in our dark past. 6S l:tb8 b3 66 'itte 2 l:th3 67 'ittd 2 'itt c 6 68 l:td8 b2 69 'ittc 2 l:th2+ 70 'itt b 1 l:.g2 71 'itta 2 g5 White helplessly watches thi s pawn m arch forward. 72 'itt b 1 g4 73 'itta 2 g3 74 'itt b 1 l:tf2 0-1 Summary

Come on people, let's fire up our sense of adventure and risk the 8 ... e s gambit in the Che banenko! One troublesome trait I have noticed in artificial intelligence i s that the moment com puters become sentient they turn hideously evil and automatically attempt to either en slave or obliterate the entire human race. There's a mountain of evidence on this impor tant issue (okay, admittedly the "evidence" is usually from science fiction like Sta r Trek and Terminator! ). At the present, Rybka and Fritz both use their abilities for good, not evil, and both com ply with I ssac Assimov's most sacred robotic laws concerning the non-harming of humans. However, thi s following game gives me cause to worry about the future.

Game38 Deep Fritz 10-V.Kramnik

Ma n vs. Mach i n e Duel, Bonn 2006 1 d4 d5 2 c4 dxc4 Fritz and Kramnik transpose to our position from a Queen's Gambit Accepted move or der. The norm al Slav move order would be 2 ... c6 3 tt'lc3 dxc4. White has three respon ses. 296

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 CD c 3 dxc4

Only the first should really be a concern for Black:

a) 4 e4! bS 5 a4! is a critical try for an advantage (see the main game). b) After 4 a4 Black has a choice: b1) 4 ... 'Df6 5 e4 e s ! 6 'Df3 (6 dxe s 'iix d1+ 7 'Dxd1 'Dxe4 8 ..txc4 ..te6 9 ..txe6 fxe6 is at least equal for Black, C.Ward-F.Cuijpers, Bern 1993) 6 ... exd4 7 'iix d4 'iix d4 8 'Dxd4 ..tcs and White was already struggling in M.Casella-L.Altounian, Costa Mesa 2003, with problems on f2 as well as ... ..tb4 threats from Black. b2) 4 ... es 5 dxes (Black stands better after 5 e 3 ? ! exd4 6 exd4 ..te6) s ... 'iix d1+ 6 t>h 7 22 ..txd4 'i'a6 ! 2 3 .:tac1 'ii'd 3 wins a piece. 16 ... 0-01 17 0-0 17 'ii'x c6? 'ii'x c6 18 llxc6 lb7b6 regains the pawn by picking off a4, with a superior ending.

300

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 tiJc3 dxc4

17 ...l:.fc8 18 'ife2

Exercise: Black would l ove to play ... cs. Can he get away with it? Answer: Yes. Kramnik calculated the next few moves perfectly. 18 ... cs! 19 tiJfd2 Or 19 dxcs tiJxcs (threatening to break the pin by ... tiJxe 3 followed by ... tiJxa4) 20 i.d4 lle7 21 tiJfd2 l:tac8. If White persists in his pinning and winning philosophy, he gets cold water thrown in his face after 22 tiJe4? tiJxb 3 ! 23 ..txb6 tiJxc1 24 'ifhs tiJxb6 25 'ifxb6 tiJe2+! 26 'ith 1 l:tc1 2 7 tiJd2 l:txf1+ 28 tiJxf1 .:c1, winning m aterial . Kramnik h ad to h ave seen to this point when he m ade the excellent decision to play 18 ... c s ! . 19 ...'ifc6l Reminding White that he/she/it h as a weakness to worry about too. 20 'ifh s!?

301


Computers are quick to anger but don't usually hold a grudge. If I didn't know better, this angry-looking move looks like one from an opponent who dislikes you and is itching to take your head off. Question: Is ..txh6 a threat? 20 ... 'ii'x a41 Answer: I doubt it. White just doesn't have the firepower to finish the job after 21 i.xh 6 ? gxh 6 22 'ii'xh 6 c4! . Let's say White now goes totally bonkers and sacs the house. Af ter 2 3 f4 cxb3 24 l:txc8+ l:txc8 2 5 l:.f3 tt::'lf8 26 .Ug 3+ tt::'lg 6 27 1:txg 6+ fxg 6 28 'ii'x g6+ �8 29 fs 'ii'a l+ 30 �f2 'ii'xb2 3 1 f6 'ii'x d2+ 3 2 �g 3 .l:lc3+ 3 3 �h4 tt::'lxf6 34 exf6 'ii'f4+ Black beats White to the finish line. 21 tt::'lx cs tt::'lx cs 22 dxcs

Question: Taking o n e 3 really messes u p White's pawns, but i t also opens the f-fil e for attack. Is it a good decision for Black to take on e 3 ? 22 ...tt::'lxe3 1 Answer: Yes, taking o n e3 displays exceptionally good defensive intuition. Black inflicts the structural damage and lives to exploit it. After the passive 22 ... 'ii'c 6? ! 23 i.xh 6 ! gxh 6 24 'ifxh 6 White has scary-looking attacking ideas like .l:lc4 and tt::'le 4. 23 fxe3

302

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 lbc3 dxc4

Exercise (multiple choice}: Which option should Black take here? a) Defend with 23 ... l:.f8 ; b) Defend with 2 3 ... g 6 ; or c) Counterattack with 2 3 ... .txcs.

23 ... i.xcs? Answer: This is perhaps the point where our human hero, after having thoroughly out played the computer, throws away the win . Black has a clear advantage after the counter intuitive and downright chickenish 23 ... l::tf8 ! , which proves to be an effective method of taming White's would-be initiative on the kingside. After 24 c6 (24l'be4 allows 24.. .'ii'b 3 ! ) 24 ... in>s ! Black enjoys a clear advantage: 1. White's c-pawn isn't going anywhere and may be in some danger; 2. Black's powerful queen hits c6, e s and d3 ; 3. Black is ready to roll forward and create a passer soon with ... a4 ; and 4. Black's king is safe. 24 'ifxf7+ 'it>h8 2 5 'ii'f 3 l:tf8 26 'iie 4 'ii'd 7 27l'bb3 i.b6 28 l::tfd1 'ii'f7 29 l:tf1 'ii'a 7 Nyet! Request denied! Kramnik avoids the draw by repetition. 30llxf8+ Black has all the winning chances after 30 l'bd4l:t.xf1+ 3 1 l:txf1 i.xd4 3 2 'ii'xd4 'ii'xd4 3 3 exd4 a4. 30 ..Jlxf8 3 1l'bd4 a4 32l'bxe6 i.xe3+ 33 Wh1 i.xc1?! His l ast shot at an attempt to win was 33 . ...l:te 8! 34 !U1 'ii'a 6 ! 35 l:tf3 'ii'x e6 36 l:txe3 'ii'a 6, when Black's outside passer is more dangerous than White's e-pawn . 34l'bxf8

303


Threatening m ate on h 7, a one-ply threat ! The game is drawn after 34 ... �g 8 3 5 ltJg6! and now, for example, 35 ... .ixb2 3 6 'ii'd S+ �h 7 3 7 ltJf8+ �h 8 3 8 ltJg 6+. Instead Kramnik played ... 34 ...'ii'e 3?? Oh no! 3 5 'ii'h 7 mate (1-0)

Well, I must give praise to D eep Fritz for the economy of its attack! Oh, the humanity! Why won't anyone listen to my dire warnings about the computer menace? Now I hope you don't think Kramnik's plight is funny. If you do, I am forced to quote from the movie Gladiator and ask the question : "Are you not entertained?" At this moment I am certain Kramnik's life flashed before his eyes. I walked into a mate in one twice in my life, and as you probably know, what follows is that h orrible internal yell like that tormented guy clutching his head in Edvard Munch's painting The Scream ! Back in the 1980's, during a blitz g am e against a 2400 player, my opponent actually passed out 304

4 e3 L i n e s a n d 3 t'Dc3 dxc4

at the board (I don't want to embarrass him by mentioning his name) when he overlooked a mate in one. Each of our losses (especially a nauseating one like this) represents a little death, and a grim reminder of our own flickering mortality. Summary

If White plays the move order 1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 t'Dc3 , then 3 ... dxc4 looks like an interesting and viable alternative to the normal 3 ...t'L:Jf6 Slavs.

305

Chapter Seven

Fourth Move Alternatives

A) 1 d4 dS 2 C4 c6 3 lLlf3 lLlf6 4 'ii'c2/4 'ii' b 3

With 4 'ii'c 2 White hopes to reach Closed Catalan position s. Instead we return to our be loved homel and by playing 4 ... dxc4. Now White can simply recapture (as in Games 40-41), which does lead to Catal an-like position s, but a poor man's Catal an for White. His queen on c4 tends to be a target and we have great fun bouncing it around with the following ideas: 1. ... bS; 2 . .. J:k8 and ... cs; 3 . ... lLld7-b6; 4. ... .te6; s . ... lLld7 and ... es, answering dxe s with ... lLlxe s.

306

Fo u rth M o ve A l t e r n a tives

White can also try 5 e4! ? b5 (Game 39). This idea m asquerades as a type of Geller G am bit, but it's a bit sneakier since White isn't tryin g to blow us away this time. It's kind of like a false friend who is nice to your face, but talks about you behind your back! White accu mulates several strategic advantages for his pawn, like a big centre, fil e pressure down the a- and c-files, and potential control over the hole on c5. Normally it's easier to plant a bomb than disarm one, but in this case computers have pretty much worked out a defensive scheme for Black to defuse White's initiative. White can also play 4 'ifh3, but from our standpoint it doesn't make the slightest differ ence since after 4... dxc4 5 'ili'xc4 we tran spose.

B) 1 d4 dS 2 c4 c6 3 liJf3 liJf6 4 g3

We return to the Catalan Gambit, with a slight tweak. In Chapter 5 White's knight was already committed to c3, whereas here it's still on bl. This slight ch ange helps White a bit since Black is denied ... b5 and ... b4 tempo-gaining ideas on a c3-knight. Even with this fa vourable twist, though, I still feel White is puffing and sweating, working hard to prove his full compensation for his lost pawn (see G ame 42). Game39

M.Lianes Hurtado-S.Rublevsky S pa n i sh Cha m p i o n sh i p, Lugo 2006

1 d4 d s 2 c4 c6 3 liJf3 liJf6 4 'ii'c 2 If White wants to play this g ambit he must choose this move order, since 4 'ifb3 dxc4 transposes to Games 40-41. 4 dxc4 We continue our Slavic ways and avoid 4 ... e6 5 g 3 -the Closed Catalan . ...

307


S e4!?

I call this g ambit the Geller G ambit's Evil Twin - a remarkable statement if you con sider that the Geller G ambit itself oozes with malice! It contains many of the qualities of the Geller Gambit. The differences are: 1. I believe it's sneakier, more subtle, and strategically sounder than the Geller Gambit. 2. 1t l acks the ferocity of the Geller G ambit and Black is not as likely to get swept away in the opening should things go awry. I got a tough online workout in thi s line a few years back against my friend, GM Einar Gausel . He proved to me that the Evil Twin G ambit can be quite potent if Black mishandles it (I had Black's defensive strategy down pat after the initial so losses!). Do you h ave one of those opening positions where you are uncomfortable on either side? Well, the G eller Gambit's Evil Twin is just such a position for me. It reminds me of my aunt's Christm as fruitcake - jam packed with mystery items nobody wants to risk eati n g ! s . . .bs 6 b 3 1

308

Fo u rth M o ve A l t e rn a t i v e s

A clear indication this isn't one of those sham pawn sacs where White regains the pawn six moves l ater. 6 ... cxb3 7 axb3 e6 8 i.d2 ! Threatening t o establish a bind with ..tas. s .. as! Oh, no you don't! 8 ... i.b7 ? ! is also played but I don 't think it's wise to allow White's bishop entry to as. For example, 9 ..tas ! 'ii'c 8 10 i.d3 tt:la6 11 'ii'd 2 ! (fighting for b4) 11.. . ..te7 12 b4! 0-0 13 0-0 ..td8 14 'ii'c 3 ..txas 1S l:txas, M. lvanov-K.Thorsteins, Reykjavik 1997. Black is in a bind on the queenside and his remaining bishop stinks. .

With 8 ... as we reach the critical starting position . Question: What exactly does White get for his pawn ? Answer: A lot ! : 1. Development l ead. 2. A giant centre. 3. Pressure down the c-file and control over cs. It is critical for Black to entice White to post a piece on cs and, when a black piece captures, to plug cs with a white pawn. Or, Black enforces ... cs him self -not so easy to do. 4. A reasonable shot at a kingside attack with the line-up i.d3 followed by es. White hits h7 and forces Black to eventually weaken with either ... h6 or ... g6. s. The as-pawn m ay later turn into a target. All this just for a pawn ! However, thanks to computer's help we can navigate our way through the mess and hopefully convert our extra pawn . 9 .id3 Threatening es sooner or l ater. 9 ... i.b7

309


10 0-0 Question: Wel l ? Why didn't White follow through with 10 e S ? Answer: It's premature and hands over dS. The h 7 grab is unsound: after 1 0. . .lt::l d 5 11 .1xh7? g6 12 .1xg6 fxg 6 13 'i'xg6+ Wd7 White doesn't get enough compensation, with only two pawns for the piece and a safe black king to boot. 10 lt::l b d7 Black can al so play 10 ... .1e7, although I prefer to play this bishop to b4 l ater, the way Rublevsky does. After 11 .1C3 h 6 12 lt::lb d2 lt::lb d7 13 .l:.a2 o-o 14 .l:.fa1 b4 1 5 .1b2 cs 16 lt::lc4 a4! 17 .l:.xa4 .l:.xa4 18 l:txa4 cxd4 19 .1xd4 .tcs Black had an edge due to his control over cs in H . N akamura-C. H ansen, Malmo/Copenhagen 2005. 11 lt::lc 3 .1b4 Holes should be occupied. 12 es .1xc3 ! Thi s is stronger than 12 . . .lt::l d 5 ? ! 1 3 lt::l x d5 .1xd2 1 4 'i'xd2 exds 1 5 .:ta2 and the as-pawn is doomed. When White regains his pawn Black is stuck with all his previous strategic woes without the comfort of extra m aterial . 13 .1xc3 lt::ld s ...

310

Fo u rth M o ve A l t e r n a t i v e s

Exercise: A test of your strategic intuition. Which plan i s best for White: 14 i.d2 preserving the c3-bishop; or 14lDd2, transferring the knight to e4 where it l oom s over d6 and cs? -�---

14 lDd2?1 Answer: Thi s is a rushed move - he is eager for the job but doesn 't want to endure the interview. Although it looks logical to head for the powerful e4-square, 14 lDd2 may be a strategic error since White seriously weaken s his grip on the dark squares. White needed to enter through the process more slowly. He would only receive some compen sation for the pawn if he took the time to hang on to his important bishop: 14 ..td2 ! h6 1 5 l:tfe1 b4! 16 l:te4 .i.a6 171lg4 ..txd3 18 'ii'x d3 'it>f8. I still prefer to play Black, but White's space plus, attacking chances and queenside pressure give him compensation. 14 ... lDxc3 15 'ii'xc3 0-0 16 ltJe4

311


Exercise: White i s about to establish a powerful blockading bind on c s . This i s the moment Toto pulls back the curtain and everyone realizes the Wizard of Oz i s not as great and fearful as his press releases indicated. How do we respond to this strategic threat?

Answer: Don't allow it! Black returns the pawn to open a powerful diagonal to his once buried bishop: 16 ... cs! The secret of this line is a well timed ... cs, returning the pawn for either equality or an edge for Black. 17 ttJxcs I don't believe in White's attacking chances for the pawn after 17 ltJd6 cxd4 18 'iixd4 i.ds 19 :tel (White can't regain his pawn with 19 ltJxb s ? due to 19 ... 'iig s ! double attacking g2 and es) 19 ...b4 20 1:.e3 ! g6 since Black has quick access to .. .f6 or .. .fs if White tries ideas like 21 'iif4 i.xb3 22 :h 3 'iie 7, with .. .fs to follow. 17 ...ltJxcs 18 dxcs White stands slightly worse no m atter how he plays it. 18 'iix cs b4 19 .i.c4 l:te8 ! intending ... l:.e7 and ... .:td7 gives Black an edge. 1s ... 'iid s 19 f3 b4 Artificially isol ating White's c-pawn . 20 'iic 2 lUeS!

White m axed out on his credit card and now faces the angry creditors. Without m aking a noticeable error, except possibly on his 14th move, White stands worse. Witness the tri umph of computer-generated defence over a dangerous gambit. 21:tac1 Question: How can it be bad to take a pawn with check?

.______

312

Fo u rt h M o ve A l t e rn a t i v e s

Answer: The trouble for White is that 2 1 i.xh7+? is more o f a dubious piece sac than a pawn grab. After 2 1 ... d4 32 c7 b2 3 3 l:tcc4 h 5 34 l:.b8 Wg 7 ! wins. 32 ....:.c2?! It doesn't m ake sense for Black to just hand over his b-pawn . Instead he should starve the beast with 3 2 ... b 2 ! 3 3 l:tC3 Wg7 34 c7 h 5 3 5 l:tb8 h4!, winning easily. 33 :xc2 bxc2 34 :c4 'ot>g7 35 '.t>cs Now it's going to be a race. 3S ... hs 36 'ot>d6 g4 37 Wd7

314

Fo u rth M o ve A l tern a t i ves

37 :xc6 Confidently calculated. There are three types of people in the world: those who can count and those who can 't! Rublevsky, unlike your math-challenged author, proves he is in the first category. Black's two passed pawns prove to be too much for White's single rook. White's king is just too far away to be of help. 38 .:.xc6 g3 Black's passed pawns run down like a still-not-dry watercolour. 39 .l:lxc2 h4 40 bl. My prediction for the future: the future is uncertain ! 13 'ifcl Ducking before Black takes a swing with ... bs. 13 ... bs 14 'it>b1 More time lost. 14 . :fe8 15 ..th3 cs 16 ..te3 Another lost tempo. 16 . ..l'tJb61 Giving White a dilemma: weaken with b3 or allow a knight into c4. 11 ..tgs ..tes l .

.

326

Fo u rth M o ve A l t e r n a t i v e s

18 .tell? Question: A passive retreat in the midst of an attack? Why didn't White take over the initiative with 18 f4? Answer: Because Black had no intention of backing down ! Gelfand would certainly have sac'ed with 18 ... ..txb 2 ! 19 xb2 tt:Jxe4. The position is totally unclear but Black is the one attacking. Pono probably rejected thi s line simply because h e didn't want to go on the de fensive - despite Gelfand's attempted bribery of a full piece ! 1S ... tt:Jh s l It's critical for Black t o lock down f4. 19 l:thg1 tt:Jc4? Black's provocation move misses a problem in his own position.

327


Exercise (multiple choice}: Which move is White's best continuation? a) 20 b 3 ; b) 20 .i.d7; c) 20 l:l.d7

20 b3?1 Answer: White missed 20 1Ld7 ! l:leb8 2 1 .tg4! 'Df6 2 2 .tfs ! regaining control over f4. Black is helpless to prevent f4 and es, which give White a winning attack. He can't play 22 ... /Dh s ? due to 2 3 l:td7 'ilfb6 24 f4 and the pawns roll forward. Going back a move, Black should have played 19 ... ltad8 ! to prevent 1Ld7 ideas. After 20 1Lg4 'Df4 (blockading f4) 21 'Dxf4 1Lxf4 22 1Lxf4 'ifxf4 2 3 'ifxcs 'Dc4! I prefer Black's chances: 1. His knight is demonstrably superior to White's bishop; and 2. His attacking chances look good, whereas White's attack hasn't gotten off the ground. 20 ...l:tab8?! What looks like a shot turns out to be not even a glancing blow. The invulnerable knight taunts White from c4, but so what? Pono ignores it, following the wisdom mothers passed on to their children since Cro-Magnon times: Sticks and stones can break my bones but names can never hurt me! H e should h ave covered d7 once again with 20 ... /Db6. 21%:.gs?l Missing 2 1 1Ld7 ! l:te7 22 JLxb S ! 'Das 2 3 ..tc4'Dxc4 24 'ifxc4. Here the n atural 24...l:lb4? fails miserably to 2 S 'ifxc s ! exploiting the back rank. 21 ... g6 2 2 l:tdg1 'ith8 23 f41 1Lf6 Alternatively: a) 23 ...'Dxf4? 24 .Uxe s ! 'Dxh 3 2S l:txe8+ .tlxe8 26 l:tg 2 'Des 27 f4'Dd7 28 'ifc3+ picks off the stray knight on h 3 . b ) 2 3 . . ..txf4! is possibly Black's best choice. After 2 4 l:l.xh s1Lxc1 2 S 'itxc1 gxh s 26 bxc4 f6 27 'ifc3 l:lb6 2 81i.fs Black merely faces h ard times, not end times!

328

Fo u rt h M o ve A l t e r n a t i v e s

Sometimes at the board one senses the critical n ature o f a position and a n intern al set of warning lights flash. Here is just such a position. Ponomariov must h ave realized that matters had gone terribly wrong for his opponent and that White has a dizzying list of tempting possibilities. The question i s which one i s the best? Exercise (multiple choice): Find the most potent line for White: a) 24 l:.dS; b) 24 l:.xh S; c) 24 es

24 l:txh s?l Logically, White gives up something (m aterial) to get something in return (he creates multiple abrasions in Black's king side}, but it's not the best. Answer: Instead, White gets something for nothing (always a great deal ! ) with 24 l:tdS ! . After 24. . .l:ted8 2 5 .l:lxd8+ 'ii'x d8 26 e s ! White wins a piece since he threatens the bishop as well as 27 bxc4. 24 ... gxhs 2 5 tt:Jg3 .:gs 26 .l:tdl 26 e S ! looks quite promising for White. 26 ... il.d4 2 7 tt:Jfs 'ii' b 6 28 es 'ii'g 6? He should play 28 ...:bd8.

Exercise: White to play and win material.

Answer: 29 lt:Je71 'ii'x c2+ 30 'it;xc2 lt:Jb6 White's point is 30 ... l:tge8 fail s to 3 1 lt:Jc6 and the triple attack on b8, C4 and d4 wins material. 31 lt:Jxg8 l:txg8 3 2 il.e3 The position gel s to reveal a clear advantage for White, who h as the safer pawns. 32 ...:ds 3 3 b4?

329


Another blunder! White should h ave played 3 3 .tg 2 ! Wg 7 34 .txd4 cxd4 3 5 Wd3 and the d-pawn soon falls.

Exercise: Black can save himself. How?

33 ...tt:\c4?? Answer: Certainly not like this which loses heavy material . 3 3 ... tt:\d5 ! is the move: a) After 34 .td2 cxb4 the position is unclear and I doubt Black stands worse. b) 34 .txd4? tt:\xb4+ 35 Wc3 tt:\c6 ! leaves White fighting for the draw. 34 bxc5 1-0 Oops! Black finds him self red-faced after this simple move. There is no remedy to the pin and Black drops a piece. Many mistakes were committed in this game, but of course this i s only natural consid ering the blitz time limit. Sometimes when we see an error-filled game played by two great players it is easy to fall under the delusional belief th at we would beat them easily if we pl ayed them over the board! I h ave played too many great players to believe in this delu sion. One of the reasons both sides made a lot of not-so-great moves is the simple fact of the incredible complexity of the game. lesser players (i.e. me!) would be making double question marks l eft and right in such situations, while Pono and Gelfand merely made du bious moves! Whenever I play super-GMs in online blitz, they invariably play (what appears to me) flawlessly and it's always me who plays like a donkey, making one moronic decision after another. Summary

Sometimes there is a demarcation line between playing chess for the pure joy of it, and playing chess to be a ruthless business person climbing up the corporate ladder to reach

330


the first prize in the tourn ament. 7 ...i.xf3 ! ? induces a rich g ame with creative ideas for both sides. However, it's a game I suspect is in White's favour. The insipid 7 ... e6! gives Black easy equality. Being a corporate man, I would harness myself in an Arm ani suit, Gucci shoes and Walmart chess tie, and go with the l atter! Game42

V Tukmakov V Korchnoi le n i ngrad lnte rzo n a l 1973 .

-

.

1 d4 d 5 The actual move order in the game was 1...lL'lf6 2 c4 e6 3 g 3 dS 4 i.g 2 dxc4 s lL'lf3 bS 6 a4 c6 7 o-o i.b7 8 lL'les a6, transposing. 2 c4 c6 3 lL'lf3 lL'lf6 4 g3

4

...

The Catalan Gambit, again! dxc4 Question: Do I h ave to keep accepting the Catalan G ambit?

Answer: No, you can also decline with the very easy-to-learn 4 ... ..tfs, which is generally regarded as a rock-solid option with White committed to d2-d4 and probably the reason the 4 g 3 move order isn't employed by any 2600+ players. Al so, you can get this position if the opponent begin s with the Reti versus Slav but then changes his mind and plays his d pawn to d4 (see Game 47, Reti-Lasker). Play m ay continue 5 i.g2 e6 6 0-0 lL'lbd7 7 lL'lc3 ii.e7 with a solid position. Thi s is a good choice if the Catalan Accepted theory gets you nervous and you want to keep your life simple. 5 .ig2 b5 6 lL'les i.b7 7 a4 a6 8 o-o e6

331


Question: Why are we back to the Catalan G ambit? You've already covered it in Chapter 5. Answer: In Chapter 5. White committed to a very early tt:'lc3 , which allowed Black, in many positions, to hit back with ...b4. H ere White's knight still sits on b1, so I 'm treating it as a separate line. This slight distinction is probably in White's favour when compared to the Chapter 5 version, so I 'm not going to trash the Catalan Gambit (as much !) in this chap ter. 9 b3 It looks a bit strange covering the Catalan Gambit with a very old game (the oldest!) and a line (9 b3 cxb3 10 �b2) which isn't played as much as newer alternatives. Question: So why pick thi s g ame? ----

Answer: Simply because it's a classic. Newer lines will be covered in the notes. And here they are ! a) 9 tt:'lc3 tt:'ld5 10 e4 tt:'lxc3 11 bxc3 tt:'ld7 12 f4 �e7 1 3 'ii'g 4 o-o has been played a few times. I realize many attacking players would prefer White here, but I just don't buy that White has full compensation for his pawn - and White's terrible stats h ere back me up on this one. Note that White no longer has �h 6 because his f-pawn blocks it. b) 9 axbS may be a better choice. For example, 9 ... axb5 10 litxa8 �xa8 11 tt:'lc3 tt:'ld5 12 e4 tt:'lxC3 13 bxc3 �e7 14 'ii'g 4 g6 15 �h6 and White got attacking compensation in C. Bauer A. David, Degremont 2004. Rybka suggests 15 ... �f6, when I would take Black. I do acknowl edge this preference is a matter of style. 9 ... cxb3 10 �b2

332

Fo u rth M o ve A l t e rn a t i v e s

10 ...1i'b6 Supporting his queen side pawns and covering his bishop on b7. One rule of thumb to remember in the Catalan Gambit is that ... 'ii'b 6 is a lot more risky for Black if White has ac cess to e2-e4, followed by �e3 , facing the queen on b6. Altern atives for Black include: a) 10 ...ll'lbd7 ! ? returns the pawn, hoping to snatch the initiative in the process. 11 �xc6 �xc6 12ll'lxc6 'ii'b 6 13 axbs 'ii'x bs 14ll'las .l:tb8 1S ll'lc3 was M.Orlinkov-E.Sveshnikov, Mos cow 2007, and here Black continued his generosity by playing 1S ... 'ii'h s ! ?, with an unclear position. b) 10 ... �e7 (Bl ack wants to castle before indulging in any adventures) 11 'ii'x b3 0-0 12 ll'ld2 .l:ta7 ! (in order to recapture on b S with his c-pawn) 1 3 .l:tfd1 1i'e8 14 l:tac1 as 1S e4 �a6 16 axbs �xb s ! ? (16 ... cxbs 17 ds gives White full compensation for the pawn) 17 1i'e3 when White's file pressure and Black's extra pawn bal ance each other out, G .Orlov-V.Akopian, Minsk 1990. c) 10 ...ll'lds 11 Wxb3 ll'ld7 12 ll'ld3 ! (logical ; White avoids trades and increases his grip over the key cs-square) 12 ... �e7 13 ll'ld2 o-o 14 l:.fc1 'ii'b 8 1S aS ! ? 'ii'a 7 16 e4ll'lc7 17 1i'c3 l:tac8 was G .Kaidanov-A.Galkin, Moscow 2003. White had full compensation for the pawn, but such positions are bread and butter to us Slav lovers. We work h ard for our money and contract negotiations stipulate that we agree to toil for the next 30 moves to earn our wage of just one pawn ! 111i'xb3ll'lbd7 12ll'lxd7 If White plays 12 ll'ld2 Black shouldn 't be in any rush to trade on e s . G.Orlov-V.Pupols, Seattle 1990, continued 12 ...ll'lxe s ? ! 1 3 dxesll'ld7 14 1i'c2 �e7 1 Sll'le4 o-o 16 l:tfd1 .l:tfd8 17 ll'ld6 �xd6 18 .l:txd6, when Black's extra pawn was outweighed by White's advantages: 1. Bishop pair; 2. Control over the dark squares; 3 . A grip on d6; 4. Pressure on c6; and 333


s. Black remains tangled up, despite two connected passers on the queen side. 12 ...ltJxd7 13 liJd2 !/Le7 14 d S I ?

White swaps his d-pawn for Black's g-pawn in order t o disrupt castling rights and inflict a permanently insecure king, at the cost of Black's attaining greater central influence. 14 ... cxds 15 !/Lxg7 :g8 16 !/Lc3 :g41? The rook swims perilously far from the shore. Korchnoi, as is his usual custom, indulges in an adventure even if it violates chess laws. Korchnoi is like the character in Oliver Twist who declared "the l aw is an ass ! " We are taught as beginners that it is taboo to bring out rooks early in the game, when they can be attacked by our opponent's minor pieces and pawns. H ere Korchnoi takes his rook for a leisurely drive through heavy middlegame traf fic. H e trusted in his legendary powers of calculation to compute his way out of any mess, and decided to create one ! For those of u s who don't possess legendary calculation powers, there is the simple 16 .. b4 17 !/Lb2 as, as played in R.Wiesen -K.Koegler, correspondence 1988. I just don't buy the argument that White has full compensation for the pawn. 17 %:.fb1?1 Possibly the seed of White's trouble. 17 axbs would give White a better version of what he got in the game. .

334

Fo u rth M o ve A lt e r n a t i v e s

11 -tcs l ...

Question: Why didn't Blade win a pawn with 17 .. .!tJcs, with the intention of taking on a4? .

-----

Answer: This would actually be a sac since White has the trick 18 Wc2 .!tJxa4 19 l:txa4! l:txa4 20 Wxa4 bxa4 2 1 l:txb6. However, I'm not sure whether your line is a blunder or not! Black h as some compensation for the piece, and that passed a4-pawn is sure to get White nervous. For example, after 21 ... l:tc8 22 i.d4 !tel+ 23 i.fl ..ic8 24 l:tb8 a3 25 .!tJb3 Rybka claims an edge for White, but we humans have a deeper understanding of our own pro pensity for botching such positions ! 18 e 3 ..ixe31

When a chemist takes an element and mixes it with another, the result is a totally sepa rate compound. So far it looks like Korchnoi's focus has solely been on the queenside. Now

335


he unexpectedly sacs a piece in the centre to snatch the initiative (back on the queenside!). In this case Korchnoi's sac i s absolutely sound. The dull, unimaginative proletariat (sadly, I include myself in this unfortunate group) would probably go for 18 ...b4 19 as 'ti'd6 20 �b2 �c6 21 ltc1. 19 fxe3 'ti'xe3+ 20 '>t>h1 :cs

Exercise (multiple choice}: White's bishop is under attack and he h as a dedsion to make: a) 2 1 .i.b4 ; b) 2 1 .i.as ; c) 21 •d1

21 �as? White, wantin g everything, gets nothing. Answer: White's best is to give back some of the material with 2 1 'ti'd1 ! . Following 21...'ti'xc3 22 'ti'xg4 'ti'xd2 White may achieve counterplay against Black's exposed king. 21 Ji'xb3 22 lbxb3 After 22 :xb3 lbcs 23 :b4 :xb4 24 �xb4 lbxa4 Black h as four healthy pawns for the piece. 22 ...l:txa4 2 3 :xa4 bxa4 24 lbd2 �c6 An assessment: 1. Black h as a whopping four pawns for the piece. 2. Black's doubled, i solated (but passed!) a-pawns give White some hope. 3 . Black's king sits in the centre while White's is separated from the action on h1. Conclusion : Black has excellent chances to convert if he plays the ending accurately. Unfortunately for Tukmakov, in the early 80's Korchnoi was probably only second to Fischer in the world as an endgame virtuoso. .•

336


2 s :c1 Question: Doesn't White win a pawn after 25 .i.f1? Answer: Indeed he does. But he also loses ! In winning the pawn his pieces fall out of sync. Take a look: 2 S ... i.bs ! 26 i.xbs axbs 2 7 l:txbs a3 ! (White is curiously tangled up by the march of this lone pawn) 2 8 llb1 l:tcs ! (White's bishop bizarrely runs out of room on the open board) 29 i.b4 a2 ! 30 %1a1 :c2 3 1 �g 1 l2Jes 3 2 �f1 l2Jc6 and White's overloaded boat capsizes on the queenside. 2s ...l2Jes 26 �g1 �d7 2 7 lDf31 White must play very precisely to h ang on. 2 7 .i.c3 ? .i.bs 2 8 .i.b2 :xc1+ 29 .i.xc1 l2Jd3 30 i.a3 l2Je1 ! breaks the blockade on a3 and allows Black's passer to move forward. White's bishop on g 2 i s totally useless and is of no help in h alting the m arch of the passer on the a file. 21 l2Jxf3+ 2s i.xf3 d41 29 i.hs Swappin g down would be a bad decision. It's just too easy for Black after 29 i.xc6+? :.xc6 30 :d1 %1c4 31 �2 �d6 32 �e2 e s . 2 9 .. .fs 3o g4 .••

337


Exercise (multiple choice): Black h as two easy paths to victory and one which l ets White back in the game. You have a 66.66% chance of g etting it right even if you guess wildly! a) 30 .. .fxg4; b) 30 ...l:tg8; c) 30 .. .f4

30 .. .fxg4? Answer: The endgame maestro blunders in his traditional time trouble and falls victim to the l aw of unintended consequences: Often the most pragmatic move, intending to clar ify a position, may be the one which complicates matters the most! Both 30 ... :gs and 30 .. .f4 win easily. 3 1 l':.d1? Missing his l ast chance with 31 l':.c4! �dS 32 l':.xa4! (32 l:txd4?? :tel+ 33 f2 a3 wins). White h as serious chances to save the g ame after 32 ... l:tc1+ 33 f2 l:tc2+ 34 g 3 l':.g 2+ 3 5 f81 Question: Why didn't Black chop the knight and trade queens the following move? In this case he would be up a pawn in the ending . Answer: Black falls for a strategic cheapo i f he takes the knight: 17 . . ..ixd6? 18 .ic2 ! (the cute point: queens remain on the board) 18 ... 'ii'b 4 19 a3 ! 'it'as 20 .ixd6. The bishop on d6 is a terror and Black h aemorrhages on the dark squares. 18 'ii'x a41 This is the m ark of a flexible mind. There are none of Morphy's golden age heroics. Gulko rationally abandons his attack to regain his pawn with a superior ending. I think most players would be tempted to keep queens on the board with 18 'ii'f3 ! ? but then the position remains unclear after 18 ... 'it>g 7. 18 ... i.xa4 19 tt:Jxb7 tt:Jxes l A good decision. The bishop was just too powerful o n es. Chess pieces are commodities to be bought and sold. H ere Black gets a good deal : a powerhouse bishop in return for an improvement in White's pawn structure. 20 dxes lLld7?1 Passive. Black should play 20 ... l2Jg4! 2 1 f4 tt:Je3 and his knight, which can be backed up with ... d4, remains a bit of a thorn for White. 21 f4 .l:ta7 22 tt:Jd6 'it>g7 23 tt:Jc3 .ic6

374

Th e Exch a n g e S l a v

Exercise: Come up with a short plan to strengthen White's g ame.

Answer: 24 l2Je2 1 The knight radiates power from d4, with both e6 and f S disruptive pawn advances i n the air. It becomes quite clear that Black's king still feels insecure. 24 ... ..tbs? Sometimes in difficult situations our passions get the better of us and it's easy to ra tionalize the irrational . Scherbakov must have imagined this pawn sac somehow eases his position . It doesn't. Black gets nothing for the pawn . He could resist after 24 ... �a4 ! . 2 5 l2Jxb5 axbs 26 i.. x bs lLlcs Black doesn't escape the pawn loss with 26 ... .:.xa2 2 7 lLlc3 .l:.a7 2 8 l2Jxds. 27 f5!

375


A little reminder to Black that White's attack i s far from over despite the reduced mate rial on the board. Gulko is one of the best and n astiest closers in the business. When he gets initiative in conjunction with attack he almost never allows his opponents to come up for air. 27 ... gxfS?I He h ad to grovel with 2 7 .....td8 2 8 f6+ �h 6 29 l:tfd1 l:txa2 30 l:txds .i.b6 3 1 �fl. 28 li:\g3 l:tb8 28 ... li:\e6 29 li:\xfS+ �g 6 30 li:\xe7+ .Uxe7 31 .Uc3 is also hopeless. 29 liJxfS+ h 2 llad8 19 'ife2 ltJed7 20 e 5 . White's kingside pawn m ajority rolls forward and an attack looms, E.Bogoljubow-A.Staehelin, Bern 1932. 1o cxd s If White holds off this swap for too long, Black usually gets a well timed ... d4 with a space advantage. 1o ... cxd s 11 llc1 Or 11 e4 .i.g6 12 ttJh4 .i.h 5 13 .i.f3 .txf3 14 'ifxf3 .i.b4 15 'ife2 'ifa5 16 ltJdf3 l::r.fe8 17 lDf5 .i.f8 18 ltJe3 'iib 5 and Black looks equal, E.Kulikov-E.Shaposhnikov, Moscow 2000. 11 ...'ife7 12 l::r.c 2

That's right. Reti can't wait to transfer his queen to all Later Reti sugg ested 12 l:te1 ! ? in tending e4 next. 12 ... a s 1 A savvy move by Lasker. He intends . . . a4, forcing Reti t o weaken t o prevent this move. 13 a4 Black already stands a shade better. Both b 3 and b4 are weak and m ay need nursing care l ater on in the g ame. 13 ... h6 Lasker's strategic threat i s ... .i.h 7, and then ... e4 and ... e3 hits White h ard. 14 'ifa1 If 14 ltJh4 then 14 ... .ih7 15 e4 ltJc5 and d3 is added to the growin g list of target pawns. 14...l::r.fe8 15 l::r.fc1 .i.h7 H e is ready for ... e4 and ... e3. 16 lDf1 Alert. White sees the threat and takes control over e 3 .

381


Question: 16 ... e4 looks very strong h ere, doesn't it? White's rook on c2 is in the line of Black's bishop on h7 .

._______

Answer: Your move win s material but gives away a lot strategically. After 17 dxe4 dxe4 18 lbd4 e3 19 lbxe3 i.xc2 20 :txc2 White has huge compen sation for the exchange: 1. The bishop pair; 2. Powerfully centralized knights which eye squares like fS, c4, bS and dS; and 3. White's light-squared bishop rules the long diagonal and the light squares. Conclusion : White stands better despite giving up an exchange for a pawn . 16 tt:lcs ! ...

Exercise (multiple choice): White needs counterplay. How does he attain it? a) 17 'ji'a2 ; b) 17 :xes; c) 17 lD3d2

382

S l a v Ve rs u s R e t i a n d King 's I n d i a n A tt a c k

Answer: 17 �xes! This sac, although it probably doesn't equalize, is White's best shot at whipping up some counterplay. In return for the exch ange White gets: 1. A pawn; 2. The d4-square for his pieces; and 3 . The destruction of Black's centre. White loses ground if he tries 17 'i'a2 ? ! , as after 17 ... d4! 18 lZ'l1d2 lZ'lds Black takes over the queenside dark squares. Or if 17 l2'l3d2 ? ! there follows 17 ... d4! 18 'Wb1 lt'lfd7 19 h 3 llab 8 ! intending . . .bs with queenside pressure. 17 ... ..txcs 18 lLlxes �ac8 18 ... i.d6 ! forces White to weaken with 19 f4 or 19 d4. 19 l2'le3 Better was 19 i.h 3 �c7 20 lt'le3. 19 ...'i'e6 20 h3 i.d6? Lasker overlooks White's trick. Black keeps his advantage after 20 ... 'i'd6. 2 1 �xc8 l:txc8

Exercise: White h as been on the defensive for a while, but h e can turn thing s around this move. How?

22 l2'lf3? Not with this. Answer: White suddenly takes over the initiative after 22 lLlSg4! lt'lxg4 23 hxg4, with dual threats against ds and g7. 22 .....te7 2 3 l2'ld4 'i'd7 24 'it>h2?1 N aturally, Reti, with great urgency, transfers his queen from one strange square to an other on h 1 ! Weak squares and colour complexes always seemed to take precedence over

383


piece activity with the early hypermodernists. White should play 24 tt:lb5 ! intending it.d4 and tt:lc3 .

Exercise: Black's dS-pawn i s weak and White dominates d4. All the strategic trumps seem to be on White's end. Find the core of Black's counterplay in the position.

Answer: 24 h s l Black earns his counterplay by going directly after White's king. His last move prepares to loosen up White's pawn front. 25 'Wh1?1 Groucho Marx once said that keeping a straight face was one of the most important abilities in life. Lasker must h ave chuckled inside after watching his opponent play this move; a clever, eccentric, and Retiesque method of increasing pressure on d5. Reti's move blew my 9-year-old mind when I played over the g am e for the first time, and to my shame I thought of Lasker as a square (this was the 1960's and anyone you didn't approve of was automatically "a square") who simply got lucky defeating my then-hero Reti. The problem with 2 5 'Wh 1 is its artificiality. Even though Black gets to h ang on to his d pawn if White takes the time to h alt Black's h -pawn (with 2 5 h4! tt:lg4+ 26 tt:lxg4 hxg4 27 'Wh 1 :d8), White should have taken this route. 2S h41 26 tt:lxd s After 2 6 it.xd5 ? ! tt:lxd5 27 'Wxd5 'Wxd5 28 tt:lxd5 it.c5 29 tt:lbs it.f5 30 'it>g 2 hxg 3 3 1 fxg3 it.e6 I don't think White will hold the ending. 26 hxg3+ 27 fxg3 tt:lxds 28 it.xd s •••

...

...

384

S l a v Vers u s R e t i a n d K i ng 's I n d i a n A tt a c k

Exercise: White h as two pawns for the exchange and attacks b7. What should Black do?

Answer: Keep sac'ing ! Initiative and the n asty pin are worth more than the pawns. 28 ... .i.f6!1 29 .i.xb7 l:tcs l Lasker h a s given u p a third pawn for the exchange a n d n ow covers a White block o n d s . H e unearths some freak geometry in the position. The hidden truth is that White's king is in grave danger.

30 .i.a6 Intending ifa8+. White's troubles are revealed in the following lines: a) 30 .i.c6? ifd6 3 1 .i.e4 .i.xd4 3 2 .i.xh 7+ 'it>xh 7 33 ife4+ fS 34 ifxd4 ife7 ! ( ...l:te2 is a bru tal threat) 3 5 e3 l:tc2+ 36 'it>g 1 ifc7 and White's king can't escape without giving up an-

385


other piece with 3 7 'ii'x g7+. b) 30 e3?? i.xd4 3 1 i.xd4 .Uc2+ 3 2 i.g 2 i.xd3 and White can find no defence to ... i.e4. 30 ... i.g6 31 'ii' b 7 'ii'd 8?! Allowing Reti some wiggle room . lasker could h ave paralysed his opponent with 3 l ... 'ii'd 6 ! 3 2 i.a3 (there is nothing better) 3 2 ... ..txd4 3 3 i.xcs ..txcs 34 i.c4 'ii'd4 3 5 'i'g 2 'ii'e 3. Technically, White h as three pawns for the piece. In reality he is completely busted: 1. White's queen is completely tied down to the defence of his king . 2. White's pawns are blockaded b i g time. A fact which would have caused Reti great consternation since hypermoderni sts loved to blockade but considered it a terrible affront if someone blockaded them ! 3 . ... ..th s is the threat. If White responds with the block g4 he weaken s his dark squares around his king beyond repair. 32 b41 After 32 e 3 ? ? Black h as the familiar trick 32 ... ..txd4 33 i.xd4 .Uc2+ 34 �h l 'ii'd 6. 3 2 ....l:.c7 32 ... axb4? 33 'ii'xb4 allows White easy coverage of d4. 33 'ii'b 6

33 .. .l:ld7!! This gives Black a winning ending, but you need monumental calculation powers to see it! 34 'ii'x d8+ l:txd8 35 e3 This may h ave been the " H ey, wait a minute ! " moment for Reti. White can't weasel out of the pin with 3 S liJc6? since 3 S ... .l:td6 36 i.xf6 .l:txc6 win s a piece. 3 s ... axb4 Thi s passer costs White dearly. 36 �g2 i.xd41 37 exd4 On 37 i.xd4?: a) 3 7 ... -tfs ! wins. 386

S l a v Ve rs u s R e t i a n d K i ng 's I n d i a n A t t a c k

b ) 3 7 . . .:xd4? i s a false path and only leads t o a probable draw after 3 8 exd4 b3 3 9 i.c4 b2 40 i.a2 i.xd3 41 as b1 'if 42 i.xb1 i.xb1 43 a6 i.e4+ 44 'it>f2. 37 -tfs! 38 i.b7 i.e6 39 'it>f3 i.b3 ! ..•

This game would baffle even Sherlock Holmes. I feel like a chess crime has been com mitted and that the perpetrator got away with it, despite the evidence that there is no evi dence! How on earth did Lasker, perhaps the most underestim ated World Ch ampion, get away with sac'ing so much in an ending and still get a winning position ? Well, the reason is the computer-like accuracy from the old m an. Korchnoi, more than any other player, is the new Lasker. The two played uncannily alike, relying on brute calculation power and the genius of spotting hidden geometric quirks which everyone else is blind to. 40 i.c6 40 as? i.dS+! 41 i.xds .l:txds 42 a6 Itas wins. 40....Ud6 41 i.bs l:tf6+ 42 'it>e3 l1e6+1 43 'it>f4? White puts up a better fight after 43 'it>d2 :g6 44 g4 l::th 6 4S as .:.xh 3 46 a6 .Uh 2+ 47 'it>c1 .l:th l+ 48 'it>d2 l:tb1 ! 49 i.c1 I:!.a1 but still loses. 43 ...l:te2 44 i.c1 .Uc2 45 i.e3 i.d s 0-1 The path is cleared for the b-pawn . An amazing battle of differing chess perspectives. Summary

The Reversed London is perh aps Black's most solid and Sl av-like method of meeting a pure Reti. Game48

D.Roos-E.Bareev F rench Lea gue 1994

1 tDf3 d s 2 g3 c6 3 i.g2 i.g4

3 87


Question: Why the switch to the Reversed Torre? Why not stick with the Reversed London ?

..._____

Answer: I prefer the Torre to the London when White leaves his central pawns uncom mitted. I don't particularly like the bishop on fs if White switches to a King's Indian Attack formation with o-o, d3 and plays for e4. I have experienced trouble playing White a full move up in the London versus the King's Indian, so I 'm not in any rush to play the position a move down from what I am used to! In truth, this is just a personal preference and you can play your bishop out to fs . 4 c4 e6 5 o-o lt:Jd7 6 cxd s

This is White's alternative to playin g in pure Reti style with b3. White plans the simple d3 and possibly e4. 6 cxds ...

388


This is m y preference. I think White gets less i f Black maintains the symmetry. 6 ... exds is the more common move, and Bareev also has experience in thi s line: 7 d3 i.cs ! 8 lt:Jc3 lt:Je7 ! (I like Black's setup; he stays away from posting a knight on f6 which would be a target for White's plan, e4 and es) 9 'ifb3 i.b6 ! ? 10 lt:Ja4 0-0 11 lt:Jxb6 axb6 12 'iic 3 lle8 1 3 b3 f6 14 h 3 i.xf3 ! ? (Bareev deserves great praise - only a true Slavocrat would willingly part with both bishops ! ) 1 5 i.xf3 lt:Jfs 16 i.b2 lt:Jd6 17 'ilt'd2 bS 18 i.g 2 'ike7 and Black's knights held their own (for now!) against White's feared bishop pair in J . Piket E. Bareev, Monte Carlo (blindfold) 2002. 7 l2lc3 lt:Jgf6 8 d3 White's only prayer for advantage i s the e4 break. 8 ... i.e7 9 'iib 3?1 Not a good plan. H e goads Black into ... lt:Jcs . Then White would retreat the queen and target the knight with b4. Question: Fair enough, but what should White do instead of this bad m ove? And h ow should Bl ack reply? Answer: I would play something like 9 h3 i.h s (White would be happy to play with the bishop pair in a fluid pawn structure if Black decided to chop on f3) 10 e4 (in Reversed King's Indi an style) 10 ... 0-o, E.Pigusov-I.Novikov, USSR Ch 1988. The g ame looks dynamically bal anced.

Exercise: Does Black need to cover his b-pawn or can he offer a sac?

9 .. 0-0! Answer: He doesn't need to defend the pawn. 10 'Wxb7? is a strategic error. After 10 ... lt:Jcs 11 'ifb4 (forced since 11 'Wc6?? i.xf3 12 i.xf3 l:tc8 13 'ii'b s l:tb8 14 'ikc6 l:tb6 traps the queen) 11 ... lt:Jxd3 12 'ikd4 lt:Jxc1 13 l:taxc1 Black has regained the pawn favourably: .

3 89


1. He swapped a wing pawn for a central pawn ; 2. He picked up the bishop pair in a semi-open position ; and 3 . He may get pressure down those open files on the queen side. 10 i.f4 lLlcs 11 'iic 2 l:tc8 Clearly White's queen is not comfortable on the c-file. 12 .l:tfc1

Exercise: White continues to provoke. What's Black's plan ? Should we g et riled up and push forward with 12 ... d4 now or not?

12 ...lLlfd7 Answer: Yes we should! There is nothing wrong with 12 ... lLlfd7 but I think Black should have put on his war paint and gone for it. White gets pushed around after 12 ... d4! 13 lLlbs i.xf3 14 i.xf3 a6 1 5 lLla3 lLlds 16 i.d2 bs 17 'ili'd1 'ili'd6 18 lLlc2 i.f6, putting the squeeze on White: 1. White's bishop pair and weakness-free position still don't give him equality. 2 . ... lba4 is in the air. Black m ay follow up by doubling rooks on the c-file with strong queen side pressure. 3. Black has a plan of slow build up on the kingside with an eventual ... h s , seizing more space . ... h4 would then soften the cover around White's king . 4 . Black can play for the ... eS-e4 pawn break should the moment appear. 13 .l:tab1 i.hs He waits to see what White will do. 14 'ili'd11? The answer is nothing ! Boy, this is the mole versus the hedgehog ! If a mad scientist cloned me and I was paired with Cyrus2, this is exactly what our game would look like. Both sides proceed with super-caution. This time White carefully licks his finger and

390

S l a v Ve rs u s R e t i a n d King 's I n d i a n A t t a c k

puts i t up t o see which direction the wind blows. I don 't see a reason for holding back. White should try to get some action going on the queenside with 14 b4 lba6 15 'il'a4 lbb6 16 'i'a5.

14 ... a s ! Good judgment. H e offers up the b5-square i n order t o hold u p b4. 15 d4!? White wants a piece of the centre at the cost of weakening himself along the b1-h 7 di agonal and weakens his light squares. He has a couple of altern ative plans which offer him approximate equality: a) 15 a3 lbb6 16 b4 axb4 17 axb4 lba6. b) 15 a4 'il'b6 16 lZJb5 . 1S lba6 1 6 'il'b3 'it'b6 17 'i'bs l:tc6! 18 'i'xb6 1:txb6 18 ... lbxb6?! loses a tempo to 19 lZJe s. 19 lDd2? White plan s to m eet the threat of ... ..tg6 with e4 but overlooks a trick. Both 19 a3 ..tg6 20 lba4! and 19 lba4 l:tb4 20 b3 allow White to h ang in there. ..•

391


Exercise: Fin d a surprisingly strong move for Black.

._______

19 ... gsl This clever bank shot to his l eft kills White's plan in its crib. Unexpected moves like this sometimes show up unannounced on our doorstep while we are busy m aking other plans, much like the shock of visiting relatives who you barely know, and who don't call before hand! 20 i.e3 i.g6 Oops! White doesn't have access to e4 anymore. 21 .:.a1 .:.xb2 Black is up a clean pawn with the superior position. 22 lt:Jb3 22 lt:Jdl was better. 22 lt:Jb41 23 lt:Jd1 .:tc2 1 White h ad hoped to stir up some counterplay with 2 3 ... .l:txe2 24 .:I.C7. 24 tt:Jxa s b6 25 lt:Jb3 :as The human move. Computers like the zany, tactical line 2S ... .:.xe2 2 6 .:.C7 .:.e1+ 27 i.fl tt:Jc2 2 8 .:l.cl i.a3 ! 29 .l:t1xc2 i.xc2 30 l:txc2 l:txd1 3 1 i.xg s. 26 lt:Jc3 i.f6 2 7 .:.xc2 lt:Jxc2 28 .:l.c1 g4! Planning to take on e 3 and follow up with ... ..tg s. 29 a4 tt:Jxe3 30 fxe3 ..tgs 31 'iW2 'iWS 3 2 lt:Jd2 l:.c8 3 3 lt:Jb3 i.e7 34 e4?? Even after the superior 34 tt:Jbs .l:ta8 35 l:ta1 ..tc2 36 tt:Jc7 l:tc8 37 .:.c1 .Uxc7 38 tt:Ja1 .l:tc4 39 .Uxc2 .:txa4, Black still comes out a pawn ahead. ••.

392


Exercise: White's l ast move was a huge blunder that drops material. Do you see why?

Answer: 34 i.a31 •••

Winning material. 3 s :cz Or 35 :a1 i.b2. 3 s ...i.b4 o-1

Summary The Reversed Torre is an option against all Reti lines.

Game 49

T.Hillarp Persson-A.Giri S i ge m a n & Co, Ma l m o 2010

1 C4 C6

393


2 lL'lf3 Question: What does Black play on 2 e4? ---

Answer: I was afraid you were going to ask that. We then get 2 ... d5 3 exd5 cxd5, which i s much more likely to arise from the Caro-Kann (1 e4 c6 2 c4). Now the Caro-Kann really is outside the scope of this book and you should check independent sources to learn more about thi s line. As a start, h ere are a few positions you may need to study: a) 4 d4 (the Panov-Botvinnik Attack) 4... tt:Jf6 5 lLlc3 e6 (I'm not a fan of 5 ... tt:Jc6) 6 lLlf3 i.e7 (6 ... i.b4 is al so popular here) 7 cxd5 tt:Jxd5 8 i.d3 tt:Jc6 9 o-o o-o 10 l::. e 1 i.f6 11 ..ie4 lLlce7 with a typical IQP position. Exercise {homework assignment}: Study Karpov's g ames as Black in the Panov-Botvinnik. If you familiarize yourself with his g ames in thi s line, you will be okay. Nobody understands it better than him. b) 4 cxd5 lLlf6 and here White's m ost common options are 5 lL'lc3, 5 i.b5+ and 5 'ir'a4+, the final one being the most dangerous in my opinion . 2 ds 3 b3 Don't get confused by the myriad move orders White (and Black !) can use. 3 e3 lL'lf6 4 b3 i.f5 sees White playing e3 first and Black choosing to move his bishop to f5 in London style, rather than to g4 in Torre fashion . After 5 i.b2 e6 6 lL'lc3 h6 7 i.e2 tt:Jbd7 8 0-0 i.e7 White can play 9 tt:Jd4, as in P.Bl atny-C. Lakdawala, American Open, Los Angeles 1998. This move i s one of the reasons I tend to favour the Reversed Torre over the Reversed London : White hasn't yet played d4 and may m ake good use of that square with a piece. Black's bishop i s more vulnerable on f5 than it is on g4 in such cases. Even so, after 9 . i.h 7 10 f4 0-0 11 cxds cxd5 chances are probably balanced. In the game White began contemplating an attack with g4 soon, while Black prepared a central counterattack with ... Ite8, ... a6, ... i.d6 and eventually ... e5. ...

..

39 4

S l a v Ve rs u s R e t i a n d King 's I n d i a n A t t a c k

Question: What about the tricky move order 3 e 3 lt:lf6 4 lt:lc 3 a n d delaying d 4 t o confuse Black? A s played by m any G M s . What should Bl ack d o here? There are 'it'b3 tricks t o watch out for if Bl ack develops his bishop to fs or g4. Answer: In this instance we can play 4 ... a6 ! 5 b3 bs, and if 6 d4 we play 6 ... i.g4 and are back to our Chebanenko system from Chapter Six. 6 i.b2 i.g4 doesn't bother us either since we achieved our goal of preventing 'in>3 tricks from White. 3 ... .tg4 4 e3 e6 5 i.b2 lt:ld7 6 h3 .ths 7 lt:lc3 lt:lgf6 Realize that when you play this it gives White the green light to go after the bishops. 8 g4 It comes with a cost. He weaken s his kingside pawns. s ....tg6 g lt:lh4 lt:lcs !

395


Giri hopes to m ake White pay for not moving his queen's pawn to d4. The trouble for White is th at d3 is weak. 10 lZJxg6 hxg6 11 'ii'e 2 Question: Thi s looks awkward. Why not play 11 'ii'c 2?

__.

_ _ _

Answer: Awkward i s better than a blunder, which 11 'ii'c 2? is: 11 ... lZJxg4 picks up a clean pawn. It's also too l ate for White to toss in 11 d4: 11 ... lZJce4 12 a3 lZJxc3 13 ..ixc3 lZJe4 14 i.b2? (White has nothing after 14 'ii'c 2 but it's his only move) 14 .. .'ii'a5+! 1 5 b4? ..ixb4+! wins m a terial. 11 ... a 5 12 f3 He fears a black knight heading for e4. 12 ... es 13 gs?! This weakens White's position and I see little benefit for him. He should commend his spirit to adventure and plunge in with 13 0-0-0! ? with an unclear position. 13 lDhs 14 .:tg1 d4! •••

White's position h as soured. He pushed a lot of pawns without getting anything back in return. 15 lZJd1 Altern atively: a) 1 5 lZJe4 lZJxe4 16 fxe4 ..ic5 17 0-0-0 0-0. Black's king is safer and his attack faster. b) 15 exd4? 'ii'xd4 and White h as opened access to f4 for Black's knight. 15 i.e7 16 h4 lZJe6 17 i.h3 Hoping to eliminate the menace on e6. 17 ... lZJhf4! Spectacular stuff. Giri tosses White a knight. ••.

396

S l a v Ve rs u s R e t i a n d K i ng 's I n d i a n A tt a c k

Question: Wh at does Black g et? I t doesn't look like enough t o me. Answer: Black gets huge compensation for the piece. Rybka thinks the g ame i s even, which is norm ally a very bad sign for the piece-up guy. When a computer starts to sputter and h edge about an evaluation after a piece sac, it normally means the sac is sound. The pain White feels is by no mean s purely psychosomatic either. let's assess: 1. Black gets a behemoth of a knight on f4, unquestioned ruler of d3, lord of e2 and sov ereign of h 3 , which hits virtually every sore spot in White's position. 2 . White must scramble to cover all these weak points. This leaves his pieces awkwardly placed. 3. Black gets two pawn s for the piece after he picks up the h4-pawn . Conclusion : Perhaps White can still save himself, but the practical problems are numer ous. Thi s is one of those cases where on paper (i.e. Rybka) the g ame is even . From a practi cal standpoint Black stands clearly better because his moves are easy, while White faces enormous challenges n avigating through the fog . 18 exf4 ll:lxf4 19 'iif 1? Disorientation sticks its foot in the door with thi s logical-looking but incorrect move. White strains to cover d3 and h 3 . His only chance of survival l ay in the line 19 'iih 2 ! a4 20 bxa4 l:txa4 21 .l:tg4 .l:txc4 22 ll:lf2 'ii'd s 23 l:txf4! exf4 24 'iixf4 �d6 25 'iie 4+ 'iie s . Even then Black stands better. The h4-pawn is chronically weak and Black isn't even down m aterial . 19 Jbh4 20 ll:lf2 a41 Threatening to open the queenside and infiltrate on that wing. ..

397


Exercise (multiple choice}: White is hanging on by his fingernails. Which of these moves is the one he can't pl ay? a) 21 bxa4; b) 21 b4; c) 2 1 .:th 1

21 b4? Desperate to close the queenside, White's pieces go over the waterfalls. His only chances to stay alive were with 21 bxa4 or 21 lith l. 21 a3! 22 ..tc1 This poor guy, once on top of the world on the a1-h 8 diagonal but now just a shell of his old self, must live out the remainder of his life in the gutter on cl. 22 ... d 3 1 ..•

Damn, the Am sterdamer is just strong, positionally! White, now bound and gagged, can't move a muscle. Black's inexorable threat is ...'iVd4, .. .'ii'xc4 and either .. .'ii'x a 2 or .. .'ife2 .

39 8


23 �bl 'Wd4! 24 l:th1 At l ast White generates a threat: i.d7+. 24 Ji'xc41 Which Black rudely ignores ! He rips the scab off, opening the wound even further. 25 i.d7+ White fights off a tank with a bow and arrow. 2S ... �xd7 26 l:txh4 'Wxa2 ••

A size 13-wide steel toed boot l ands on White's neck. 27 l:txf4 'Wxbl 28 11xf7 'Wxcl+ 29 lbd1 'ir'c4! 0-1 The most practical move: 1. Black eliminates all 'iih 3 + cheapos. 2. He hits the rook on f7 g aining a tempo. 3 . He prepares to queen the a-pawn. 4. White can't cover both f7 and queening threats simultaneously. Summary

Be aware of White's b3/e3 setup and then choose between the Reversed London and the Reversed Torre. Game so

E.U bilava-J.Van der Wiel E l go i ba r 199 8

1 lbf3 d S 2 g3 2 b 4 is also possible. I prefer the Torre here with 2 . . .i. g 4 3 i.b2 lbd7. Two examples: a) 4 bs lbgf6 s a4 i.xf3 6 gxf3 e s 7 l'1g 1 g6 8 e3 i.cs 9 as o-o 10 a6 b6 11 1:ta4 'ife7 12 f4 was A. Nadanian-R.Ponomariov, Kiev 1997. These hypermodernists with their newfangled

399


ways ! I prefer Black. White's attack has an artificial colour and flavour to it and I just don't believe in its power. Al so, he viol ates the principle stating: Don't l aunch a mating attack unless you have a sound basis of extra space in the centre to begin with . b) 4 e3 ltJgf6 S h 3 .i.xf3 6 'ifxf3 e6 7 a3 �d6 8 g4! ? (Here we go again: another hyper modernist on the warpath ! ) 8 ... 0-0 9 d3 liJb6 10 ltJc3 c6 11 h4 liJfd7 12 g S 'ile7 13 �h 3 as 14 bS :ac8 1S 'ile2 tDcs 16 bxc6 bxc6 17 .Ug 1 .t:tb8 was V.Nevednichy-C.Nanu, Eforie Nord 2009. White's dream attack remains as such, and it is his own king who should be con cerned. 2 c6 3 �g2 �g4 ...

Question: Why doesn't Black play ...liJf6 before bringing the bishop out? The principle here is: Develop your knights before your bishops. Answer: In this line Black has no intention of developing his knight to f6 at all ! Observe the following setup: 4 d3 ltJd7 s ttJbd2 e6 Question: Wait just a minute. Shouldn't we seize the centre with ... es h ere? Why play so passively? Answer: It's not a m atter of passive play. Your choice here depends on what setup you favour. Most Slav players like the c6/d5/e6 "V" formation for their pawns, so I picked this one for the book. There is absolutely nothing wrong with playing s ... es. An example: 6 e4 ltJgf6 7 0-0 dxe4 8 dxe4 �cs 9 h 3 �h s 10 'ile1 0-0 11 lDb3 �b6 12 a4 as 13 �e3 i.xe3 14 'ilxe3 'ilc7 1 S lDh4 'ifb6 with a balanced position, A.Gasthofer-T.Luther, Bad Wiessee 2003. 6 o-o �d6 7 e4 White can still go Reti style with c2-c4: 7 b3 ltJe7 8 �b2 o-o 9 c4 as 10 a3 bs 11 'ilc2 es 12 cs �c7 13 e4 d4 14 �h 1 ltJg6 1 S liJg 1 'ifg s 16 liJdf3 'ile7 17 b4 l:ta7, A. Butnorius-P. Keres, Moscow 1972. Thi s position looks like a Closed Ruy Lopez with colours reversed. 400


1 .. .ti:Je1

H ere is the answer to your earlier question. Black avoids developing his knight to f6 and instead chooses e7. The reasons: 1. White's e4-e5 threat is now a non-threat. First, there is no fork. Second, Black can play ... i.. c 7, ... cs and ... li:lc6 winning the runaway e-pawn. 2. Black's structure is incredibly flexible. For example, he can play .. .f6 ... .th s and ... .tf7 l ater on, bringing his bishop back to the centre. He can al so shut down m any of White kingside pawn storms with a well timed .. .fS ! . GM Einar Gausel showed me this ... lt:le7 line 12 years ago in some blitz g ames. I remember he would frustrate my king side attacking attempts with ideas just like this! s 'il'e t .thsl? Strange but not bad. Black moves the bishop even before it gets hit with h 3 . The move seem s to work wonders because now White tries mightily to exploit Black's non-error by avoiding h 3 . The following is a brilliant example of how not t o h andle Black: 8 . . .0-0 9 h 3 .th s 1 0 b3 f6?? 11 exd s ! exds ?? 12 'il'e6+! .tf7 13 'il'xd6 and I resigned, my face the colour of borscht, N N-C.Lakdawala, San Diego (simul) 1992. I forgot the name of my opponent but never for got this cheapo. Al so, another lesson learned: When you give a simul don't show off and take the Black pieces ! 9 a3 Out of spite - White refuses to go anywhere near h 3 to teach Black a l esson. But 9 h 3 would still b e the normal thing to do. 9 ... 0-0

4 01


10 b3 If 10 e s ? ! i.. c 7 and Black is ready for his plan of ... cs and ... t"Llc6, rounding up the run away e-pawn. 11 b4 is still met by 11 ... cs. Any clash on the queens ide favours Black. 10 J:te8 11 i.. b 2 es Flexible. Black decides the time has come for him to regain his rightful place in the cen tral space scheme of things. 11 ... as attempting to stir up things on the queens ide is proba bly how I would play it. 12 i.. h 31? Black looks at l east equal after 12 t"Llh4 f6 ! . 12 t"Llg6 13 i..f s?! The start of an incorrect plan, going for the cheap shot g4. The trouble is a G M i s not go ing to fall for it! White's pieces suddenly get in front of his potential pawn storm and soon begin to trip over each other. 13 t"Llf6 14 h3?1 •.

••.

..•

4 02

S l a v Vers u s R e t i a n d King 's I n d i a n A tt a c k

Exercise: D o you see a little trick for Black?

There is a curious psychological point in chess. An opponent is at his most vulnerable when he tries to lure you into his trap. That is exactly the time when his guard is down and he doesn't expect to become trapped himself. Answer: 14 ... lt:Je7! The trapper gets semi-trapped! His f5-bishop has no place to go and his position dete riorates when it is removed from the board. 15 lt:Jh2? H anding Black a firm initiative by responding with an apathetic gesture. White has a couple of better options, although he doesn't equalize with either: a) 1 5 tt:Jxe 5 ! ? tt:Jxf5 16 exf5 i.xe5 17 i.xe5 lt:Jd7 18 f4 f6 19 d4 c 5 ! 20 c3 cxd4 21 cxd4 fxe 5 22 fxe5 'ii'g 5 . Despite those two ominous-looking central pawns o n the fifth rank, White doesn't have full compensation for the piece. b) 1 5 g4 tt:Jxf5 16 exf5 (if 16 gxf5 Black's bishop sits immune and powerful on h 5 ) 16 . . .tt:Jxg4 17 h x g 4 i.xg4 with three pawn s, the light squares and a strong attack for the piece. 1s .tt:Jxfs 16 exfs ..

Question: It looks like Black has outsmarted him self. g4 is coming, isn't it? Answer: Black has everything under control after his next move: 16 ... e4! Exploiting the black rook and white queen sitting on the same file. Also, he open s the h2-b8 diagonal, making White think twice about trapping the wayward bishop on h 5 . 17 i.xf6

403


Question: I don 't see a reason why White should refrain from winning a piece with 17 g4. Black doesn't have a way out, does he? Answer: White wins a piece but allows his king's pawn cover to get obliterated: 17 ... ..txh2+! 18 'it>xh 2 l'Llxg4+! 19 hxg4 'ii'h 4+ 20 'it>g 2 'ii'x g4+ 21 'it>h 2 'ii'h 4+ 22 'it>g 2 ..tf3+ m ates. 17 ...'ii'xf6 18 dxe4 Question: How about round two? Let's win the piece ag ain with 18 g4. Answer: Not again ! Black win s virtually the same way: 18 ... ..txh 2+ 19 'it>xh 2 ..txg4! 20 hxg4 'ifh4+ 21 'it>g2 'ir'xg4+ 22 'it>h 2 exd3 23 'ii'c l 'ii'xfs. Next there's .. J::t e 6 with a crushing attack. Stop selling out your king's pawn cover for cash ! 18 ... dxe4 19 l'Llc4 ..tc7

20 l'Lle3 Question: I'm afraid to ask, but can we possibly try 20 g4 here? Answer: Sigh ... No, it fails to 20 ...b 5 ! 21 gxh s 'iixfs 22 l'Lle3 'ii'xh 3 23 l'Lleg4 fs. I think we spot an emerging pattern : Stop asking if g4 is good. It always loses! I didn 't want to do this but you forced my h and. Einstein defined insanity the following way: " Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result!" 20 �ad8 21 'it>g2 ..tf3+?1 I believe Black risks the win playing this. After 21...'Wd6 ! 2 2 t'Llhg4 f6 2 3 a4 ..tf7, White's clumsy knight duo is no match for Black's bishop pair. 22 l'Llxf3 exf3+ 2 3 'it>xf3 lies 24 'it>g2 li'e4+ This is the position critical to the assessment of Black's 2 1st move. •..

404


Exercise (multiple choice): White can probably hold things together, but only if he fin ds the best move. You only have two choices this time: a) 25 �g 1 ; b) 25 �h 2 . Don't flip a coin to decide ! 2 5 �h2? Answer: 2 5 �g 1 ! should probably just hold. After 2 S ....txg 3 26 fxg 3 'iix e3+ 27 'iix e3 l:txe3 28 .l:tad1 l:txd1 29 l:txd1 �8 I don't believe Black has enough. I played around with this posi tion with Rybka and held several draws playing White. Here is an example: 30 l::td 8+ �e7 3 1 l:ta8! a 6 3 2 �2 l:tc3 3 3 lh7 �xc2+ 34 �1 �6 3 S l:txb7 l:tb2 36 a 4 h s 3 7 g4 hxg4 3 8 hxg4 a s 39 �e1 .l:tg 2 4 0 l::tb 6 .l:txg4 4 1 �xc6+ �xfs 4 2 l::tc s+ �e6 (42...�e4?? 43 llc4+ �3 44 .:txg4 �xg4 45 b4 and White queens first) 43 l:lxas l:lb4 44 l:ta6+ �5 4S l:taS+ whew, with a draw! 2 S .'ili'f31 This paralysing move seal s White's fate. 26 l:c1 ..

4 05


Exercise: Find Black's winning plan.

Answer: 26 ... h s ! . . .h4 is a deadly threat. And i f White plays ... 27 h4 ...to stop the threat, then ... 27 ...11d4! ...threatening ... .Uxh4+. 28 'ot>g1

Exercise: Find the knockout blow.

28 .. Jbh4! 0-1 A chain link fence is not likely to stop a hail of bullets: 29 gxh4 :e4! and if 30 �dl then 30 ... �h 2+! 31 'ot>xh 2 lhh4+ 32 'ot>g l l:.h l m ate. An important note: If you have a choice, please remember to deliver checkm ate with the lower-ranking piece - that way the mate stings more! Summary

The Reversed Torre "V" formation setup with ... c6, ... ds, ... e6, knights on d7 and e7, and bishops on g4 and d6 is guaranteed to confuse your King's Indian Attacker opponent. My database h as Black enjoying a plus score with the line.

406

I n d ex of Va r i a t i o n s Note: Figures refer to page numbers of releva nt games

The Ma i n l ine Dutch Va riation 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 liJf3 (or 3 liJc3 liJf6 4 liJf3) 3 ... l2Jf6 4 liJc3 dxc4 5 a4 .IUS 6 e3 e6 1 .i.xc4 .i.b4 8 0-0

8 . .liJbd7 8 .. 0-0 9 'ir'h3 - 78 9 l2Jh4 - 70 9 'it'e2 .

.

9 ... liJbd7 10 e4 .i. g 6 - m ain line 9 ... .i. g 4 10 l:td1 (10 h 3 - 85) 10 ... l2Jbd7 11 e4 l:.c8 12 .i.f4 - 93

407


12 .ig s - 1 oo 12 e s - 105 9 'ii'e 2 .ig6 10 e4 o-o

11 .id3 11 e s - 50 11 .ihs 12 es 12 .if4 - 65 12 ..luds 13 lZJxd s 13 .id2 - 58 13 cxds 14 'ii'e 3 .ig6 - 1 8 14 .. .ie7 - 35 14 ... l:te8- 43 •••

•

•••

.

6 lbe s 1 d 4 d s 2 c 4 c 6 3 lt::lf 3 lt::lf6 4 lt::l c 3 dxc4 s a4 .ifs 6 lt::le s

6 lt::l b d7 6 ... lt::l a 6 7 e 3 (7 f3 - 15 7) 7 .. lt::lb 4 8 .ixc4 e6 9 0-0 .id6 10 'ii'e 2 - 141 10 'ii'f3 - 151 7 lt::lxc4 lt::l b 6 S lt::le s a s •••

.

408

I n dex of Va ria t i o n s

9 f3 9 g3 9 e6 - 126; 9 lbfd7 - 137 g lDfd7 10 e4 - 112 10 lDxd7 - 120 ...

...

•••

6 tbh4 1 d4 d S 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 lDf6 4 lDc3 dxc4 5 a4 i..f s 6 lDh4

6 Ji.. d 7 7 e4 7 g 3 - 182; 7 e3 - 188 7 e6 •••

.••

4 09


8 lDf3 - 167 8 ..t xc4 - 17 6

The Geller G a m bit 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 lDf6 4 l2Jc3 dxc4 5 e4 b5 6 e5 lDd 5 7 a4 e6

8 axb5 s tDg s 8 ...h 6 - 211 8 ... ..te7 - 219 8 ... l2Jxc3 9 bxc3 cxb5 10 l2Jg5 i.b7 11 'ili'h 5 g6 12 'ifg4 ..te7

13 ..te2 - 197 13 h4 - 204

Fifth Move Alternatives 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 lDf6 4 l2Jc3 dxc4 5 e3 s tDes - 242 5 g 3 - 236 5 ... b5 6 a4 b4 7 l2Ja2 - 226 7 lDbl - 231

410

I n dex of Va ria t i o n s

4 e 3 Lines and 3 tt:Jc3 dxc4 1 d4 ds 2 c4 c6 3 lDf3 3 lDc3 3 ... dxc4 - 296 3 ... lDf6 4 e 3 a6 5 lDf3 b 5 6 b3 .ig4

7 .id2 - 273; 7 h 3 - 28 7; 7 .ie2 - 273 3 ...lbf6 4 e3 .tfs s lDc3 e6

6 lbh4 6 .ie2 - 250 6 ... .ig6 7 .ie2 lbbd7 8 o-o .id6 - 259 8 .. lbe4 - 26 7 .

Fou rth Move Alternatives 1 d4 dS 2 C4 c6 3 liJf3 liJf6 4 'iWb3 4 'iWc2 dxc4 5 e4 - 307 5 'ii'x c4 - 4 'Wb3 4 g 3 - 331 4...dxc4 5 'iWxc4 .ig4 6 lDbd2 - 316 6 lDc3 - 323

411


The Excha nge Slav 1 d4 d 5 2 c4 c6 3 cxd s cxd s 4 lt:'lf3 4 lt:'lc3 lt:'lf6 5 i.f4 'iVb6 6 'iic 2 - 359 6 .:tc1 - 368 4 lt:'lf6 s lt:'lc3 a6 6 i.f4 lt:'lc6 •••

7 :c1 - 341 7 e3 - 353

Slav versus Reti and Ki ng's Indian Attack 1 lt:'lf3 1 C4 C6 - 393 1 ... d s 2 c4 2 g 3 c6 3 .tg2 i.g4

4 C4 - 387 4 d3 - 399 2 ... c6 3 b3 .tfs - 378 3 ... .tg4 - 393

412

I n d ex of C o m p l et e G a m e s

Anand.V-Kramnik.V, Wo rld C ha m pion s h i p (G a me 7), Bon n 2008 ..43 Buhmann.R-Akopian.V, Ma i n z (ra pid) 2009 219 Carlsen.M-Bu.X, Ca p d 'Agde ( ra p id) 2008 . . . 35 Cyborowski.L-Fressinet.L, Germ a n League 2009 226 David.A-Grischuk.A, F rench League 2003 . . . .. . 50 Deep Fritz 10-Kramnik.V, Ma n vs. Mach i n e Duel, Bo n n 2006 . .. . 296 Eljanov.P-Giri.A, E u ropea n C l u b C u p, O h rid 2009 1 76 Ernst.S-Sokolov.l, N etherl a n d s League 2005 . 70 Garcia llundain.D-Miles.A, E sca ldes Zo n a l 1998 151 Gelfand.B-Wang Vue, FIDE G ra n d Prix, Soc h i 2008 . 126 Goldin.A-Bareev.E, World Tea m C h a m pio n s h i p, Beers h eva 2005 . . . 316 Gulko.B-La kdawa la.C, U S C h a m pions h i p, L a J o l l a 2004 85 Gulko.B-Scherbakov.R, Helsi n ki 1992 . . . . 368 Hillarp Persson.T-Giri.A, Sige m a n & Co, Ma l m o 2010 393 lnarkiev.E-Shirov.A, Poi kovs ky 2008 267 lvanisevic.I-Sokolov.l, C roatia n Tea m C h a m pio n s h i p, S i be n i k 2008 . 1 88 Kahn.E-Portisch.L, H u nga ria n League 2003 197 Korchnoi.V-Hiibner.R, C h icago 1 9 8 2 78 Kraai.J-Bareev.E, Wo rld Open, P h i l a d e l p h i a 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 7 Lenderman.A-Sadva kasov.D, Foxwoods Open, Ledya rd 2009 353 Llanes Hurtado.M-Rublevsky.S, S pa n is h C h a m pio n s h i p, Lugo 2006 307 Magerramov.E-Sakaev.K, Dubai 2003 . . . 2 04 Mamedyarov.S-Topalov.V, Be n idorm ( ra pid) 2003 242 Morozevich.A-Ivanchuk.V, Wij k a a n Zee 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 73 Morshedi.A-Lakdawa la.C, G a m bito ( ra pid), Sa n Diego 2008 1 05 Nisipeanu.L-Postny.E, F re n c h League 2008 .. 231 Nyback.T-Ivanchu k.V, E u ropea n C h a m pi o n s h i p, Anta lya 2004 . . 1 82 Polugaevsky.L-Torre.E, Lo ndon 1984 . . . 65 .............................

.....................................................................

.....................................

....................

.........

........

.............................................................

.............................................

.......

.........

.....

......

..

.

............

..........

.......

...........................................................

..........................................

............................

.............................................................

.....................................................

.

......

............

..

.......

..................................................

....

.

...

.

....................................................................

...................................................

...................................................................................

...

....................

......................................................................

......................................................................................

....................................

........................

.........

.......

..........

...................................................

........................................................

......................................

........................

.

............................................

............

..

.......

.........

..........

...................................................................

......

413


Ponomariov.R-Gelfand.B, F I D E World C u p, Kha nty Ma nsiys k {bl itz playoff) 2009 Radjabov.T-Kramnik.V, Mo nte Ca rlo ( b l i ndfold) 2007 Reti.R-Lasker.E, N ew Yo rk 1924 Roos.D-Bareev.E, F re n c h League 1994 Saidy.A-Lakdawala.C, Memori a l Day C l a ssic ( ra pid), Los Angeles 1998 Sargissian.G-Morozevich.A, Ka re n Asri a n Memori a l , Ye reva n 2008 Sasikiran.K-Rublevsky.S, Foros 2007 Sebekis.A-Lakdawala.C, G a m bito ( ra pid), Sa n Diego 2007 Shulman.Y-Lakdawala.C, Kolta nowski Memoria l, S a n F ra n cisco 2000 So.W-Ni Hua, Olo nga po City 2010 Sussman.L-La kdawala.C, G a m bito ( ra pid), Sa n D iego 2009 Tadic.B-Bogosavljevic.B, Cet i nje 2010 Topa lov.V-Kramnik.V, World C h a m pion s h i p (G a m e 2), E l i sta 2006 Topalov.V-Kramnik.V, World C h a m pio n s h i p Pl ayoff (ra pid), E l i sta 2006 Topa lov.V-Wang Vue, MTe l Ma ste rs, Sofia 2009 Tukma kov.V-Korchnoi.V, Le n i ngra d l nterzo n a l 1973 Ubilava.E-Van der Wiei.J, E lgoi ba r 1998 Van Buskirk.C-La kdawala.C, Southern Ca l ifornia C h a m pio n s h i p, I rvi ne 1998 Vitiugov.N-Amonatov.F, Soc h i 2006 Wang.H-Carua na.F, Reykjavi k 2008 Wukits.R-Ragger.M, Austria n League 2007 Zukertort.J-Steinitz.W, World C h a m pions h i p (Ga me 1 ) , U SA 1 8 8 6

...

..................................................

............................................................................................

................................................................................

...................

.........................

323 157 3 78 387 3 59 341

.....................................................................................

..........................................

....................

.......................................................................................

.........................................

................................................................................

1 00 141 287 250 120

............................

................

............................................................

....................................................

............................................................................

....................................................................................

......................................................................

112 331 399 93

211 137 236

.............................

414

18

259

.........

...................................................................................

58

10

The Slav: Move by Move

Understanding Chess Move by Move

Understanding Chess Move by Move

Logical Chess Move by Move

The Art of Planning in Chess: Move by Move

Grandmaster Chess Move by Move: John Nunn Applies the Move by Move Approach to His Best Games

Bad Move

Move Me

Killer Move

Bad Move

Bad Move

Bad Move

Move Me

Logical Chess: Move By Move: Every Move Explained New Algebraic Edition

Don't Move

Killer Move

Move it

The Next Move

The Next Move

The Next Move

Bad Move

Move it

Move Me

Don't Move

Move Me

Don't Move

Did The Earth Move

The Best Move

Bad Move

Move it

Killer Move

The Slav: Move by Move

Understanding Chess Move by Move

Understanding Chess Move by Move

Logical Chess Move by Move

The Art of Planning in Chess: Move by Move

Grandmaster Chess Move by Move: John Nunn Applies the Move by Move Approach to His Best Games

Bad Move

Move Me

Killer Move

Bad Move

Bad Move

Bad Move

Move Me

Logical Chess: Move By Move: Every Move Explained New Algebraic Edition

Don't Move

Killer Move

Move it

The Next Move

The Next Move

The Next Move

Bad Move

Move it

Move Me

Don't Move

Move Me

Don't Move

Did The Earth Move

The Best Move

Bad Move

Move it

Killer Move

Recommend Documents