Lecture Notes in Editorial Board
Beig, Vienna, Austria J. Ehlers, Potsdam, Germany U. Frisch, Nice, France K. Hepp, Zfirich, Switzerland R. L. Jaffe, Cambridge, MA, USA R.
Kippenhahn, G8ttingen, Germany Ojima, Kyoto, Japan H. A. Weidemniffier, Heidelberg, Germany R. 1.
J. Wess, Mfinchen, Germany J. Zittartz, K61n, Germany
ManagingEditor W.
BeigIb6ck
Assisted by Mrs. Edwina Pfendbach
Springer-Verlag, Physics Editorial Department II Tiergartenstrasse 17, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany c/o
Springer Berlin
Heidelberg New York
Barcelona
HongKong London Milan Paris
Singapore
Tokyo
Physics
The Editorial
Policy for Monographs
Physics reports new developments in physical research and teaching quickly, informally, and at a high level. The type of material considered for publication in the New Series mincludes monographs presenting original research ornew angles in a classical field. The timeliness of a manuscript is more important than its form, which maybe preliminary ortentative. Manuscripts shouldbe reasonably self-contained. They will often present not only results of the author(s) but also related work by other people and will provide sufficient motivation, examples, and applications. The manuscripts or a detailed description thereof should be submitted eitherto one of the series editors or to the managing editor. The proposal is then carefully refereed. A final decision concerning publication can often only be made on the basis of the complete manuscript, but otherwise the editors will try to make a preliminary decision as definite as they can on the basis of the available information. Manuscripts should be no less than ioo and preferably no more than 400 pages in length. Final manuscripts should preferablybe in English, or possibly in French or German. Th ey The series Lecture Notes in -
should include
a
table of contents and
an
informative introduction accessible also to
readers not particularly familiar with the topic treated.Authors
are
free to usethe material
publications. However, if extensive use is made elsewhere, the publisher should be informed. Authors receive jointly 50 complimentary copies of their book. They are entitled to purchase further copies of their book at a reduced rate. As a rule no reprints of individual contributions can be supplied. No royalty is paid on Lecture Notes in Physics volumes. Commitment to publish is made by letter of interest rather than by signing a formal contract. Springer-Verlag secures the copyright for each volume. in other
The Production Process The books are hardbound, and quality paper appropriate to the needs of the author(s) is used. Publication time is about ten weeks. More than twenty-years of experience guarantee
authors the best possible service. To reach the goal of rapid publication at a low price the technique of photographic reproduction from a camera-ready manuscript was chosen. This process shifts the main responsibility- for the technical quality considerably from the publisher to the author. We therefore urge all authors to observe very carefully our guidelines for the preparation of camera-ready manuscripts, which we Will supply on request. This applies especially to the quality of figures and halftones submitted for publication. Figures should be submitted as originals or glossy prints, as very often Xerox copies are not suitable for reproduction. For the same reason, any writing within figures should not be smaller than 2.5 mm. It might be useful to look at some of the volumes already published or, especially if some atypical text is planned, to write to the Physics Editorial Department of Springer-Verlag direct. This avoids mistakes and time-consuming correspondence during the production period. As a special service, we offer free of charge LATEX and TEX macro packages to format the te.&,t according to Springer-Verlag's quality requirements. We strongly recommend authors to make use of this offer, as the result will be a book of considerably improved technical quality. Manuscripts not meeting the technical standard of the series will have to be returned for
improvement. For further information please contact
Springer-Verlag, Physics Editorial Department II,
Tiergartenstrasse 17, D-6912i Heidelberg, Germany.
Yasuyuki Suzuki
Kalman Varga
Stochastic Variational
Ap proach to Quantum-Mechanical
Few-Body Problems
P) .
-
.
8
Springer
Authors
Yasuyuki Suzuki Department of Physics Niigata University Ikarashi, Niigata 959-2181, Japan
[email protected] Kdlm;in
Varga Physics Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne,
IL 6o439, USA
[email protected] Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for. Die Deutsche Bibliothek
-
CIP-Einheitsaufnahme
Suzuld, Yasuyuki: Stochastic variational
approach to quantum mechanical few-body Berlin Heidelberg ; Kalman Varga. New York Barcelona ; Hong Kong ; London ; Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo : Springer, 1998 (Lecture notes in physics)
problems / Yasuyuki Suzuki
-
ISBN 3-540-65152-7
ISSN 0940-7677
(Lecture Notes
ISBN 3-540-65152-7
in Physics. Monographs) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York
This work is
subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright the material is concerned,
Law. @
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998 Germany
Printed in The
use
of general
descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publica-
tion does not imply, even inthe absence of a specific statement,that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and
regulations
and therefore free for
Typesetting: Camera-ready by authors Cover design: design &production GmbH, Heidelberg SPIN: 1055261g
5513144-5432-10
-
Printed
on
acid-free paper
general use.
Table of Contents
I..
Introduction
2.
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems
........................................
...........
7
2.1
Hamiltonian ......................................
7
2.2
Relative coordinates
..............................
9
..................................
15
2.3
Symmetrization
2.4
Permutation of the Jacobi coordinates
..............
16
.........................................
18
Complements C2.1 An N-particle Hamiltonian in the heavy-particle center
18
......................
19
................
21
.............................
21
Introduction to variational methods
principles
3.1
Variational
3.2
The variance of local energy The virial theorem
3.3 4.
...........
coordinate set
C2.2 Canonical Jacobi coordinates 3.
1
.......................
30
................................
33
.......................
39
................................
39
...............................
43
......................
44
.........................
47
..............................
47
....................................
50
Stochastic variational method 4.1 4.2
optimization A practical example 4.2.1 Geometric progression 4.2.2 Random tempering Basis
4.2.3
Random basis
4.2.4
Sorting
4.2.5
Trial and
.......................
Refining 4.2.7 Comparison of different optimizing strategies Optimization for excited states
4.2.6
4.3
error
search
...................................
50 53
.
54
....
56
.........................................
61
.................
.
I
Complements
XII
Table of Contents
C4.1 Minimization of energy 5.
versus
variance
..............
Other methods to solve
5.2
few-body problems Quantum Monte Carlo method: The imaginary-time evolution of a system Hyperspherical harmonics expansion method
5.3
Faddeev method
5.4
The generator coordinate method
5.1
.........
...........
6.
..................................
Variational trial functions 6.1
6.2
6.4
65
67 70
72
..........................
75
Correlated Gaussians
Gaussian-type gerninals Orbital functions with arbitrary angular Generating function The spin function
Complements
..............
.
82
87
................................
94
C6.2 Solid
spherical harmonics C6.3 Angular momentum recoupling C6.4 Separation of the center-of-mass C6.5 Three electrons with S
=
as a
basis
.....
96 96 105
.....................
106
motion
.........................
1/2
......................
arbitrary spin arrangement
112
115
......
115
...........................
116
............................................
118
an
C6.7 Six electrons with S
Matrix elements for
=
0
spherical Gaussians, generating function
............
123
..........
123
..............................
125
7.1
Matrix elements of the
7.2
Correlated Gaussians
7.3 7.4
Correlated Gaussians in two-dimensional systems Correlated Gaussian-type gendnals
7.5
Nonlocal
7.6
Semirelativistic kinetic energy
Complements
potentials
.
129
.................
131
.
.
.
.
...............................
......................
.........................................
C7.1 Sherman-Morrison formula Exercises
.
..........................
from correlated Gaussians
Exercises
momentum
.........................................
C6.6 Four electrons in
75
..............................
C6.1 Nodeless harmonicoscillator functions
7.
65
...................
and correlated
6.3
.........
61
134 137
143
........................
143
............................................
145
Table of Contents 8.
Small atoms and molecules
.........................
8.3
Coulombic systems Coulombic three-body systems Four or more particles
8.4
Small molecules
8.1
8.2
.......
149
.....................
150
...................................
.........................................
C8.1 The cusp condition for the Coulomb potential C8.2 The chemical bond: The H,+ ion C8.4 9.
169
.................
to muonic, molecules
174
................................
177
One-gluon exchange model Meson-exchange model
.....
178
........................
178
............................
181
quark
Few-body problems in solid state physics 10.1 Excitonic complexes 10.2 Quantum dots 10.3 Quantum dots in magnetic field 10.4 Quantum dots in the generator coordinate
model
...........
188
...................................
191
11. Nuclear
a
magnetic
213
...
213
.............
216
...............................
223
.........................................
230
systems with central forces
potentials
Pauli effect in s-shell A
C11.4 The "C nucleus
Appendix
204
..........................
C11.1 Correlations in few-nucleon systems C11.2 Convergence of partial-wave expansions
Quark
....
196 202
field. 204
few-body systems Introductory remark on nucleon-nucleon potentials
11.2 Few-nucleon
as a
...............
230
............
233
hypernuclei system of three alpha-particles
..........
239
.
242
...............................................
Matrix elements for
A.1
method
.........................................
C10.1 Two-dimensional electron motion in
C11.3
187
..............................
....................
Complements
171
....
9.2
11.3 Realistic
167
....................
The trial function in the constituent
11. 1
165
167
9.1
Complements
154
........
molecules
Baryon spectroscoPy
9.3 10.
Stability hydrogen-like Application of global vectors of
149
........................
............................
Complements
C8.3
XIII
general
Correlated Gaussians
A. 1. 1
Overlap
A.1.2
Kinetic energy
Gaussians
..................
.............................
of the basis functions
247 247
247
................
247
.............................
249
Table of Contents
XIV
A.1.3 A.1.4
......................
250
..................
256
Two-body interactions Density multipole operators
A.2
Correlated Gaussians with different coordinate sets
A-3
Correlated
Gaussian-type geminals
AA
matrix elements
Spin
A.5
Three-body problem and spin-orbit forces
Complements
.................
262 263
with
central,
tensor
..............................
265
.........................................
280
...............
280
..............
283
matrix elements of the correlated Gaussians
Overlap a three-particle system
.........................
285
............................................
288
..............................................
299
...................................................
307
for
Exercises
References Index
257
.............................
CA. 1 Matrix elements of central potentials CA.2 Matrix elements of density multipoles
CA.3
...
1. Introduction
There
are a
countless number of examples of quantum-mechanical few-
body systems:
constituent
quarks
in subnuclear
physics, few-nucleon
few-cluster systems in nuclear physics, small atoms and molecules physics or few-electron quantum dots in solid state physics, etc. The intricate feature of the few-body systems is that they develop or
in atomic
depending on the number of constituent particles. The mesons and baryons, the alpha-particle and the ’Li nucleus, or the He atom and the Be atom have very different physical properties. The most important causes of these differences are the correlated motion and the Pauli principle. This individuality requires specific methods for the solution of the few-body Schr6dinger equation. Approximate solutions which assume restricted model spaces, mean field, etc. fail to describe the behavior of the few-body systems. The goal of this book is to show how to find the energy and the wave function of any few-particle system in a simple, unified approach. The system will normally be in the minimum energy quantum state. As forewarned, however, to find this state, the ground state, is a complicated matter. The present stage of the development of computer technology, however, makes a very simple approach possible: Searching for the ground state by "gambling". Without any a priori information on the true ground state, completely random states are generated. Provided that the random states axe general enough, after a series of trials one finds the ground state in a good approximation. The reader individual characters
may find this
suspicious but there are indeed a number of fine tricks in the trial and error procedure which makes the whole idea really practicable. Before bombarding the reader with sophisticated details, let us demonstrate the random search with an example. Let us try to determine the energy of a Coulombic three-body system: a positron and two electrons, the positronium negative ion, Ps-. The example is sima
little
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 1 - 6, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
1. Introduction
2
ple enough so t1i at a graphic illustration of the wave function can be given, but its solution is far from being trivial. The ground state of this particular system can be calculated by different methods accurately. In the rest of this chapter we will give just the outline of the gambling method without paying much attention to the details. To look for the wave function of the ground state of the system, we generate random functions. The functions we assume some
continuous a.re
parameters
or
randomly
chosen. For
Tf (a, 0, x,
y)
=
=
are
random in the
depends
on some
sense
that
discrete
or
"quantum numbers" and these paxameters example, we assume a simple Gaussian form
e`2 -
3Y2
(1.1)
7
1r2 -7'31 denotes the distance between the two electrons and I (r2 +r3) /2 r 1 1 denotes the distance between the center-of-mass
where Y
functional form which
x
=
-
of the electrons and the
positron.
A certain number of parameter sets a and and then the energy expectation values of the
randomly chosen generated states are calculated and compared. The one among them giving the lowest value is selected to be a successful paxameter set. Figures 1.1(a)-(d) show examples of four random states and their energy expectation values which are obtained with such successful paxameters. Not surprisingly, the energies of the "configurations" appreciably depend on the shape of the functions, that is, on the random paxameters. The lowest energy, -0.11 in atomic units (a.u.) in Fig. 1.1(d), is higher than that of the exact ground state (-0.262). Here in the atomic units M, (the electron mass), e (the electron charge magnitude), and h axe chosen to be basic quantities of units, so the unit of length is Bohr radius h?/(Mee2) 5.29x1O-11 m, theunit of energyis me4/h? 27.2 ao 2.42 x 10-17 S. (Actually the and the unit of time is h3/(me4) eV, minimum energy calculated analytically with one term of Eq. (1.1) is -0.177, but it may not be known for a general case.) That means that the trial function is not general enough to describe the ground state. To improve the trial function, let us take a linear combination of two of the above functions of Eq. (1.1), where one of the two is fixed as the one already selected and another is newly selected after a number of random trials. Figures 1.2(a)-(d) show examples for random wave functions which are calculated by the two terms. The energy improved because the model space increased but we still miss a substantial amount of binding energy. Increasing the model space further =
axe
=
-
=
by adding one,
we
more
and
more
functions to the linear combination
reach the exact energy and the
wave
function
one
(Fig. 1.3)
by
with
1. Introduction
E--0.09
E--3.15
E=0.18
E--0.11
Examples of the energy expectation value and the (normalized) xyTf (a, 3, x, y) of Ps- for one random basis state. Figure 1(a) is in the upper left, 1(b) in the upper right, 1(c) in the lower left, and 1(d) in the lower right. In each section the x axis denotes the distance
Fig.
wave
1-1.
function
between the two electrons and the y axis denotes the distance between the center-of-mass of the two electrons and the positron. Atomic units are used.
1. Introduction
E-0.14 E=-0.18
0.1
0.0
B-0.12 E=-0.17
0.1 0.0
Fig.
1.2.
Examples
xyjcj-T1(aj, Oj
of the energy expectation value and the
wave
function,
y) +c2Tf(a2, 02 Xi Y) ji of Ps- for combinations of two random. basis states. Figure 2(a) is in the upper left, 2(b) in the upper right, 2(c) in the lower left, and 2(d) in the lower right. See also the caption of -,
Fig.
1. 1.
x,
1
1. Introduction
a
combination of about 150 functions of the form
(1.1).
The
5
conver-
gence of the energy versus the number of the functions in the linear combination is shown in Fig. 1.4. The energy gain is large in the first
few steps and then it
slowly approaches the
exact energy.
E=-0.262
X
1.3. The energy and the wave function of Ps- obtained selection of 150 basis states
Fig. and
by the trial
error
The alert reader may question the importance of the steps that are taken to increase the model space and can ask why not start
with,
say,
a
linear combination of 150 functions and
then, by random
trials of all the parameters, one may find the solution. The reason for increasing the number of functions in the combinations is to control
of the energy. By comparing the energy gain in the successive steps one can guess how far the exact ground-state energy is. There is no guarantee that the ad hoe 150 functions would be the
"convergence"
1. Introduction
6
-0.250
-0.252 M 41
-0.254
-0-256
-0.258 Z
-0.260
-0.262 20
40
60
80
100
Dimension of the basis
Fig.
1.4. The energy convergence of Ps- as a function of dimension of basis are increased one by one with the trial and error selection. The
states that
solid, dashed and dotted
curves
correspond to
sufficient to reach the solution in
cases
three different random
paths.
where the exact energy is not
known. A
skeptic may say that one should, instead of the above gambling method, try a deterministic parameter search such as that furnished by the Newton or conjugate gradient method. While this may be true for small systems, the random trials the
axe more
successful in most of
a. by avoiding being trapped omnipresent local Moreover, one may have discrete paxameters or quantum numbers
cases
in the
i
where the deterministic seaxch may not be suitable. One may also wonder if the solution we reach is
ground state energy. These the succeeding chapters.
the in
and other
I
really (close to)
questions will be answered
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems 2.
first step toward the goal of giving a unified and reasonably simple recipe for solutions of few-body bound-state problems the basic
As
a
notations and concepts
The motion of the
operator
ton
axe
introduced here.
few-body system
(Hamiltonian)
and described
governed by the Hamilby the eigenfunction of the
is
depends on the positions and other degrees of freedom of the particles. See, for example, [1, 21 for textbooks on quantum mechanics. One can define the positions of the particles in several different ways by using single-particle or relative coordinates. The single-particle coordinates are useful if the particles move ah-nost independently of each other. The relative coordinates are advantageous to emphasize correlations between the particles and Hamiltonian. This
to
wave
function
separate the center-of-mass motion. One
can
relate the different
coordinate systems to each other by linear transformations. The definitions and the properties of these transformations are elaborated in this
chapter.
indistinguishable particles. To comply with the Pauli principle the wave function has to be properly symmetrized. In the spatial paxt of the wave function the symmetrization induces permutations of the coordinates. It is shown that these permutations can be imposed by linear transformations in the relative coordinate One often deals with
space.
2.1 Hamiltonian isolated system of N particles with masses ml., and let 7,1,, ,,rN denote the position vectors of the particles. -, mAT All of the particles may be identical or different, or some group(s) of them may be identical. The Hamiltonian of the system, with the
Let
us
consider
an
*
center-of-mass kinetic energy Tcm
being subtracted,
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 7 - 20, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
reads
as
8
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems
2.
N
N
2
H=E 2mi
-T,.
As the interaction
(2.1)
Vij.
+
unchanged by the displacement of the origin, the above Hamiltonian is translationaUy invariant and depends on the internal degrees of freedom only. One may encounter few-body, problems where the system is subjected to some external field or the particles move in a single-particle potential. The Hamiltonian then reads as IV
H
=
Vij
N
2
E2
remains
+
1: Ui + 1: i=1
i=1
N
(2.2)
Vij.
i>i=l
Even with the presence of the one-body potential Ui it may happen that one wants to remove the contribution from the center-of-mass motion. This will be considered later in
evaluating the matrix elements
of various operators. An extension of the nonrelativistic kinetic energy to the relativistic kinematics will be discussed in Sect. 7.6.
Three-body potentials can be treated in principle but axe suppressed for the sake of simplicity. The two-body potentials are assumed to be local (but nonlocal potentials will also be considered in Sect. 7.5) and can in general be expressed as
Vij
=
1: VP(ri
-
rj) 0?.
P
=
1: f VP (r) J(ri
-
rj
-
r) 0?. dr.
(2.3)
P
Here p is the short-hand notation to specify the component of the potential which is characterized by 0?. (e.g., central, spin-orbit, etc.
and
VP(r)
is the
corresponding form factor.
To
specify
the
particle
motion, several degrees of freedom are in general needed besides the spatial one. For example, the nucleon has spin and isospin degrees
freedom, and the quark has spin, flavor and color degrees of fre&dom. The specific potentials related to nuclear, subnuclear and other of
systems will be discussed in later sections.
2.2 Relative coordinates
9
2.2 RelatiVe coordinates The
separation of the center-of-mass motion
care
of most
important to describe intrinsic excitations of the system. The center-of-mass motion is taken mass
conveniently by introducing
coordinates;i
pose of
a
matrix. In
(XIi X2
is
relative and the center-of-
xN). The symbol- stands for a trans-
particular,
x
is often used to stand for
an
N
x
1
one-column matrix whose-ith element is xi, whereas ,'c a I x IV onerow matrix. Here XN is chosen to be the center-of-mass coordinate of the system and the rest of the coordinates
relative coordinates.
independent single-paxtide coordinates
i
-=-
They
(rj,
-'
fXI,
-
-
-,
X N-I
I
is
a
set of
in general related to the a linear transformation: by TN) axe
N
Uijrj,
xi
ri
=
j=1
E (U-I)ijxj
(i
We show two
examples
of relative coordinates
is the Jacobi coordinate set, which is defined
by
x.
See
Fig.
2. 1. One
the matrix
4
3
0
0
(a) 2.1.
(2.4)
C
2
Fig.
N).
j=1
Examples
(b)
of relative coordinates for the
four-particle systein. (a)
the Jacobi coordinate set, xi =rl -r2, X2:-- (MIrI +M2P2)/(MI +M2)'r3 7 X3 = (Tnlrl + M2r2 + M3 r3)/(Ml + M2 + M3) -P47 and (b) the heavyparticle center coordinate set, xi = rl r47 X2 = r2 r47 X3 = r3 r4-
-
-
2.
10
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems
Ui
1
-1
MI
M2
M12
M12
M1
M2
M12
...
M12
N-I
...
0
...
0
(2.5)
N-I
M1
M2
Tal2---IV
Tnl2---.LV
MN ...
...
M12
...
N
given by
Its inverse matrix is
M2
M3
M12
M123
Tni
M3
M12
M123
(Uj)
0
MIV ...
M12
---
M
MN ...
M12
...
N
(2.6)
M 12
0
M123
-"M12
0
0
...
N-1
M12 ...N
where M12 i +mi and, especially, 7nl2---N is the total Tnl+Tn2+ the "heavy-particle center" coordinate is Another the of mass system. -
...
set defined
UC
by 1
0
0
0
1
0
-1 -1
...
(2.7)
-
0
0 M12
---
N
...
M12
...
...
...
M12 ---N
M
given by
and its inverse matrix is
...
N
M12
...
M
N
(UC )-I
M12
...
M12
...
N
M1V-I
M2
MI ...
MN-I
M2
M, M12
M12
-1
...
MN
M2
Mj_
N
M12
N
M2
M12
...
N
MN-I
M2
MI
M12
...
N
M12
...
N
M12
...
N
(2.8) The choice of the when the other
mass
particles.
heavy-particle
See
center coordinates may be natural
particle is heavier than the masses of the Complement 2.1. Note, however, that it is always
of the Nth
2.2 Relative coordinates
11
possible to transform from one coordinate set to another. The Jacobian corresponding to the coordinate transformation (2.4) is unity for both U matrices.
Corresponding to the transformation (2.4), the momentum pi is -ih ya conjugate to the expressed in terms of the momentum -xj axj =
coordinate xj: IV
Pi
=
N
1: Ujilrp
Wi
=
1:(U-l)jipj
(i
1,
=
...,
N).
(2.9)
j=1
j=1 N
Note that -7rAT
=
Ej=1 p,
is the total momentum. The center-of-mass
kinetic energy is given by T,,n ir2,v/(2MI2 N). The kinetic energy with the center-of-mass kinetic energy subtracted is then operator =
...
expressed
as
(27ni 6ij
P i=1
2mi
i=1
j=1
2m12
...
N)
Pi
Pj
M-1 N-I
2
Aij-xi i=1
-
(2.10)
-7rj,
j=1
where N
1: UikUjk Mk
Aij
(i,j
=
11
....
N
-
1).
(2.11)
k=1
To evaluate the potential energy matrix elements for the tions that contain
no
dependence
on
the center-of-mass
wave
func-
coordinate,
it
is convenient to express the single-particle coordinate relative to the center-of-mass, ri xN, the interparticle-distance vector, ri -,rj, and -
difference, pi pp in terms of x and easily done by using Eqs. (2.4) and (2.9):
the momentum This is
-
-x,
respectively.
1V-1
ri
-
XN
1: (U-l)ikXk
=
-W X,
(2.12)
k=1 N-I
'ri
-
r3
1: k=1
((U-l)ik (U-I)jk) -
Xk
=
W(j) X,
(2.13)
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems
2.
12
N-1
2
(Pi
Pj
E (Uki
2
-
(ij )Ir-
Ukj)7rk
(2.14)
k=1
Note that the contribution from the term
(Mi
momentum, is
-
legitimate
Mj)/(2Ml2 N)7rN, ...
when
we are
proportional to the total omitted in Eq. (2.14). This
is
in the center-of-mass
(,7rlV
system
=
0)
and
interested in the intrinsic motion of the system. The Hamiltonian of type (2.1) is now expressible in terms of independent relative coordinates alone. In what follows
and
x
7r are
relative coordinates unless otherwise
(i.e. (N
matrices
introduced to
the notation.
by the
usual matrix
W(i) EN-I k Xkk=1
=
that -
they are (N-1) x 1
1)
1 one-column
x
I)-dimensional vectors) 0), Oj),
simplify
which is formed
-W X
-
stated,
so
Eqs. (2.12)-(2.14), (N
one-column matrices. In
represent only the
meant to
Wx
E.g.,
is
a
and
(W)
are
Caitesian vector
multiplication of iv(i) and x, i.e., that Oj) and (W) satisfy the following
Note
equalities M-1
-((ij)
3 W(ij) (k k
W( ij
=
(-ipw(ij)
k=1 N
W(ij)(1(ij)
W
k
i>i=l
2
=7 -
N
are
an
(N
-
1) x (N
-
1) symmetric
scalar
products
E xi-(Ax)i
i=1
(2.15) =
1,
EN
Uki
=
0
A,
let the
quadratic
of the Cartesian vectors:
xv)
j=1
convention, that
with this
1V -
matrix
Aijxi-xj. i=1
show,
ai(ri
1),
N-1 N-1
i=1
It is easy to
-
?ni/?nl2---N, (U-1-)iN
=
N-I =
N
used.
form, bAx, represent ..bAx
kI
R, I
Jk,
where the relations UNTj For
F(ij)
i>i=l
N
for k
(ij)
2 i=1
ajw(')J))
x,
(2.16)
2.2 Relative coordinates N
1V
I:
a
ij
(ri _,rj)2
1:
=.i
a
ajjw
-(ij)
(ij)
(2.17)
X.
i>i=l
i>i=l
As
13
special case of the above relations, we have the following equalities
for the moment of inertia around the center-of-mass: N-1
N
N
Mi(ri
-
XN
where the reduced is defined
MzMj
)2
M12
mass
...
N(ri
Tj)
-
corresponding to
ILi
2
(2.18)
the Jacobi coordinate xi
by ?ni+17nl2 M12
...
...
z
(2.19)
1).
N
i+1
We also obtain 2
N
N
(ri
-
T'j )2
N
=
E(ri XN)2
(,ri
_
-
(2.20)
xiv)
i=1
The term are
the
E , (ri
-
XN)
masses
of all the
particles
same.
The total orbital mass
vanishes when the
system
(-xv
=
angular
0)
momentum
be
can
operator L in the center-of-
expressed
in terms of the
operators
relevant to the relative coordinates: N-1
N
(ri
hL
i>i=l
((,ri
-
X
Pj)
Tj)
(XN
X
2
(Pi
X
-
(Xi
7N)
X
7ri),
(2.21)
Pj))
N
or i
-
X
'r
Rij)
-X
i>i=l
+
((ri
-
W('j)X
rj) XMi
-
2M12
X
Mj ...
7rN
N
(('j)-7r) =NU. 2
(2.22)
Quantum-mechanical few-body problems
2.
14
Eq. (2.22) use is made of Eq. (2.15) in the last step. Thus the equality of Eq. (2.22) holds in the case one considers the orbital angular 0 or treats a system of paxticles momentum in the system of 7rjV with equal masses. In atomic physics the trial function of Hylleraas type or correlated In
=
exponential type is often used with success. This function contains the exponential form expressed in terms of the interparticle-distance coordinates. T-nstead of the exponential function let us consider its Gaussian analogue IV
T
=
exp
E
2
aij (ri
-
rj )2
(2.23)
i>i=l
aij determine the falloff of the interparticle functions and may be considered variational parameters. Since not all of the N(N 1)/2 interparticle-distance vectors, ri rj, are Here
N(N
1)/2 parameters
-
-
-
(Irl T2) + (T2 -r3), it is convenient to T3 e.g., TI rewrite T in terms of the independent coordinates x. This is needed to independent,
calculate, e.g., the Eq. (2.23) as T
=
exp
aij
are
(
(N
where the
=
-
-
-1 2
-
related
1)
norm
-
of T.
Equation (2.17) enables
one
to rewrite
iAx), x
(N
-
(2.24)
1) symmetric matrix A
and the parameters
by N
N
(ij)
AkI
ajjWk
(ij) WI
=
I:
aij
(W
-
(ij) W(ij)
i>i=l
i>i=l
) kl'
N-I N-1
aij
-
1: 1: UkjAkIU1j k=1
=-
-(CTAU)ij
(i
(2.25)
i=l
'where jLjN mimN/(Tni + Talv) is the reduced mass for the ith and Nth particles. The potential energy VjV (i 1, ..., N 1) is a function =
=
of ri -rN on
xi and
=
the ith
can
be considered the one-body potential Uj
On the other hand the
particle. lighter particles can
N-I
H=E i=1
Potential
energy
function of ri -,rj xi thus be reduced to the type of Eq. (2.2)
between the
HamiltoTdan
-
2AjN
a
=
-
xj. The
N-1
N-I
2
^7r'
is
acting Vij acting
+EUi+ 1:
(Vij+
j>i=i
=1
MN
7ri-7rj).
(2-34)
problem is thus reduced to that of an (N-1)-paxticle system with an external field Uj and an additional separable "two-body potential"
The
oo, jLjjv goes to mi and the 7ri .7rj term The effect of the finite nucleax mass in the helium atom
7ri -7rj. In the limit of m1V -
disappears. was
discussed in
-->
[3].
The above formulation
can
also be
applied
to
a
system of identi-
particles when some, or most, of them form an inert core. As an example let us take up the nuclear shell model, where the nucleons
cal
divided into two groups, the passive or inactive nucleons and a relatively small number of active nucleons. The passive nucleons form are
C2.2 Canonical Jacobi coordinates
19
by filling the lowest possible single-particle orbits and exert a potential field Ui on each of the active nucleons. The active nucleons may occupy several single-particle orbits belonging to several major shells outside the inert core. In this approximation it is desiran
inert
core
able to describe the motion of the active nucleons without inclusion
arising from the center-of-mass motion. It is clear can be excluded by taking the full Hamiltonian have the form (2.34) with the core as the heavy particle.
of any excitations
that such excitations to
2.2 Canonical Jacobi coordinates
As
was
2.2, the Jacobi coordinates
noted in Sect.
that the transformation matrix Ui of Eq.
is,
neither
following
UjUi-
nor
relations
UjA-'Uj
Uj-Uj
(2.5)
have the property orthogonal, that
to the unit matrix.
Instead, the
fulfilled:
are
L-1,
=
equal
is
x
is not
UiLUi
=
(2.35)
A,
with
Lij
Mi
Aij
Jij
Ai
(2.36)
Jij,
N where pi (i 1, 1) is the reduced mass belonging to the ith Jacobi coordinate and is defined in Eq. (2.19), while 1LV is equal to the =
-
the transformation between
the singleUir and p UT-x, of paxticle and the Jacobi coordinate systems, x identities the lead above relations the to and following (2.9), Eqs. (2.4) total
mass
'MI-2
N.
...
By using
=
N
N
E Tnir?
=
z
N
E Nx
Alternatively,
N
pi2
E
-
Mi
one can
introduce
Ir2i Ai
=
-(2.37)
"canonical" set of Jacobi
a
coor-
dinates: IV
Vijrj
with
V
=
A
2
UiL 2.
(2.38)
j=1
The square root matrices of the diagonal matrices L and A axe simply given by the square root of the elements. This system of Jacobi
coordinates
Vf"
=
belongs
f7v
and therefore
17
to
an
orthogonal
transformation:
(2.39)
Complements
20
1V
1V
EVji j
E
and
j=I
IV
2i
=
Er2
i=1
(2.40)
i*
i=1
Let the momentum
Simfla,rly
to the
canonically conjugate to i be denoted qi. transformation of coordinates, we obtain the trans-
formation of momenta
follows:
as
N
71i
=
N
E ViiPi,
A
E Viini
=
j=I
(2.41)
j=I
The total Idnetic energy does not take to q and can be expressed as follows:
I?
diagonal
a
E E (VLfr) ij?7i -77j wLf7rl.
E Mi
i=1
j=I
The two systems of the Jacobi coordinates ical Jacobi coordinates =
For
ujf '
a
=
=
M1
rT; 1'2
?T 1 M
M2M3
3
M123
12MI23
VMM1232:
1
2
particles with equal I
1
V
vf2-
I
I
v/6-
T6
I
'1
73T
v/3-
disadvantage
masses
(2.43)
mi
axe
as
0
12
M12
M123
(2.44)
V-Ml'23 M3
mass
2 -
V"6_
(2.45)
1
73
of the canonical Jacobi coordinates
is that if the
equal then the center-of-mass motion is not sepais not the center-of-mass coordinate).
not
easily ( N
matrix V reads
0
-
V/2-
rated
=
V(Uj)-Ix.
VMM1123
The
can
-VEM12
L2 M12
and for
Vr
Ujr and the canoneasily be related by x
three-paxticle system the transformation
V
(2.42)
=
i=1
X
form with respect
3. Introduction to variational methods
The variational method is
popular approaches to tackle quantum-mechanical few-body problems. Though it gives only an approximate solution except for some special cases (the Ritz variational method, for example, gives only an upper bound of the energy), one can get a virtually exact solution with an appropriately chosen function space. The function space is defined by basis states and the wave function of the system is expanded in that, basis. In this chapter we briefly introduce the theorems requisite for obtaining a vaxiational one
of the most
solution.
3.1 Variational
physical system whose Hamiltonian H is self-adjoint (Hermitian), bounded from below and time-independent. We are interested in finding the discrete eigenvalues of H and its corresponding (normalized) eigenstates:
Let
us
consider
principles
H!P,, The
=
a
En(fi,
energies En
n
axe
=
(3.1)
1, 2,...
real and
are
ordered such that El :! E2
-
El,
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 21 - 37, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
(3.2)
3. Introduction to variational methods
22
where the
equality
if and only if Tf
holds
is
an
eigenstate of H
with the
eigenvalue El. Proof.
elementary and can be found in of quantum mechanics. See for example [1, 2]. The ftmetion expanded in terms of the energy eigenstates
The
textbooks T1 may be
proof
of this theorem is
00
(3-3)
ai(fii.
cluded and the
integration
over
(Tf jHn Itp) (TrI Tf )
with continuous
eigenvalues are sum must be extended appropriately to include them. Then we can show that for an integer n
expansion
In this
the
eigenstates
Faci=2 A Eln)Jai 12 00, jai 12 Ei= 0
n Y
inan
7
-
En I
-
-
(3-4)
I Clearly the right-hand side of Eq. (3.4) is non-negative for n and if for > if i It vanishes 2. 0 because Ei E, > 0 for only ai i > 2, that is, T, is an edgenstate of H with eigenvalue El. This proves I was used to prove the Ritz the Ritz theorem. Only the case of n theorem but other cases will be needed later to derive Temple's bound. =
=
-
=
approximate deexploited as ground-state energy El, namely the minimization principle of the mean value of H. Suppose that we choose a family of functions Tf (a) which are characterized by a finite number of parameters denoted a. In the case of Eq. (1.1), there axe two parameters a and P. We calculate the mean value E(a) of the Hamiltonian H in this trial function, and minimize E(a) with respect to a. The minimal value obtained in this way is an approximation to tile ground-state energy El of the system. Clearly, whether this variational method produces a satisfactory result or not substantially depends on the choice of the trial functions Tf (a). The Ritz theorem can be generalized to excited states as well: The Ritz theorem is the basis for
a
method of
it is
termination of the
Theorem 3.2
(Generalizecl
of the Hamiltonian H discrete eigenvalues.
value
Proof.
Let
E(TfIT)
=
us
(TfjHjTf)
sumed to be linear term
calculate
an
is
infinitely in JT1, we obtain
Theorem).
stationary
in the
increment JE of the
The
expectation neighborhood of its
mean
to Tf
value us' g
where JTf is
+JT-1, changed Neglecting terms of higher
when Tf is small.
Ritz
as-
order than
a
3.1 Variational
(TfITf)JE
=
=
The
(JTf IH
value E is
mean
-
-
23
EJ((TIITI))
EITI)
+
(TfIH
stationary if JE
(3.5)
EIJTf).
-
=
0 for any infinitesimal
JT,
if
is,
that
J((TIIHITI))
principIcs
(,NTtIH
EITI)
-
+
(TIIH
If JTf is chosen to be
the above
number,
-
-(H
EIST)
-
E)Tf,
(3.6)
0.
=
where
-
is
that the
equation implies
an
infinitesimal real
norm
of the function
(H E)Tf is zero, and thus the function (H E)Tf itself must be a null function, namely HTf = ET. Therefore the mean value E is -
-
stationary if and only if the state Tf from which E is calculated is an eigenstate of H, and the stationary value E is the corresponding
eigenvalue
of the Hamiltonian.
generalized Ritz theorem allows an approximate determination of the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. If the E(a) has several extrema, they are the approximate values of some of the energies E,,. In most cases for practical applications the. trial function is given as a linear combination of a finite number of independent functions This
!P(a): K
(3.7)
ciTf (ai).
Tf
independence of the functions will be discussed soon later. T' (a K) axe mutually orthogWe do not always assume that Tf (a I) onal because the use of nonorthogonal. functions is in fact quite useful. They can, however, always be made orthogonal if necessary, e.g. by a Gratn-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure. The variational method then reduces to the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian inside the state space VK spanned by the set JTf((YI),...,Tf(aK)Ji that is, the space containing all linear combinations of T (a,), Tf(aK). The mean value E is given by The linear
,
...
i
...
E where and
Ctlic =
-
c
(3.8)
CtBC' is
a
IC-dimensional column vector whose ith element is
ct is the Hermitian conjugate of c. The K
overlap
matrices W and B
are
defined
by
x
ci
K Hamiltonian and
3. Introduction to variational methods
24
Rij
(Tf(ai)JHJT'(cvj)),
=
Bij
(TI ((Yi) I Tf (aj)).
=
(3.9)
The linear parameter ci can be determined by the generalized Ritz theorem. The condition that E is stationary with respect to an ar-
bitrary, infinitesimal change problem
of ci leads to the
generalized eigenvalue
K
Wc
E&,
=
E(Rij
i.e.,
-
EBij)cj
=
0
(i
=
I,-, K).
(3.10)
j=J
The restriction of the thus
can
simplify
eigenvalue problem
of H to the
subspace VK
the solution.
We discuss the linear Tf (a K). The linear c
except for
c
0
=
can
function. In other
and
only
for
has
E
c
K
if c
independence of the functions Tf(al),..., independence of the functions means that no vector make
words,
0. This is
=
a
linear combination ,
EK i=1 ciTf(ai),
the combination becomes
equivalent
unique solution of c ci!F(ai) 0 is equivalent a
=
0.
null
null function if
that the
equation Bc 0 (To understand this, we show that
to
to Bc
=
saying
a
a
=
0. Whe'n
=
EK ci!P(ai)
=
0,
0 for j obviously have Ef I ci (TI(aj) JTf (ai)) I,-, K, which but for 0 0 nothing j I,-, K. Conversely, when (Bc)j (&)i for j I,-, K, by multiplying cj* (the complex conjugate of cj) and we
=
is
=
=
=
=
=
summing
over
j,
we
obtain ctL3c
Fj-1 ciTf (ai)
which leads
us
solution
0 for the
=(.EK CiT,(Cv,) I EK I
K
1
ciTf (ai))
=
0,
a unique 0.) equation Bc 0 is possible only when detB --A 0, the linear independence of the functions is assured by the condition detB :A 0. Because the overlap matrix B is at least positivectBc > 0 for any vector c, all eigenvalues semidefinite, that is (Tf JTf)
c
=
to
=
As the existence of
=
=
p of B become
Tf (a K) ar e real, positive when the functions Tf (a,), linearly independent. The positiveness of M is understood as follows: For the eigenvector c :A 0 corresponding to the eigenvalue JL, we have the relation pctc As the basis functions Tf are (Tf Ifl. linearly (ai) independent, Tf is not identically zero because otherwise we can make !rf EK ciTf (ai) vanish identically with c =A 0, which contradicts the i= I assumption of the linear independence of the basis functions. Thus (TfITf) is positive and of course ctc is positive, so the eigenvalue y has to be positive. We can also state that if there exists a vanisl-iing eigenvalue of B then the basis set JTf(a1),..-,Tf(aK) is linearly dependent. The solution of the eigenvalue problem, pc(A), gives us an ....
=
=
BcG l
orthonormal set:
=
3.1 Variational
principles
1: C(ii.') Tf (C'j),
01.1
25
(3-11)
2
i=l
where
c(l')
is assumed to be normalized to
c(") tc(/")
=
1. In many
practical problems it may happen that B has one or several very small eigenvalues. Then the eigenstate corresponding to the small eigenvalue has very large expansion coefficients cil") If this occurs then a - Flj,. small error in the matrix elements of R or B can lead to a larger error in the solution of Eq. (110). When the ill condition mentioned above does not occur, the generalized eigenvalue problem (3.10) can be solved safely. The eigenvalues q
(i
est
1,
=
...'
K)
eigenvalue
are
arranged be
El may
a
increasing order el :! good approximation to in
62
:
the
...
The low-
ground-state
energy El if the state space V_T
>
(Ek
(Ek -
-
E)2
E)',
jai 12.
(3.28)
which proves the theorem.
The Weinstein criterion guarantees that there is
an
eigenstate
whose energy is in the interval [E G-, E + o-] but does not indicate which one. In case E is sufficiently dose to the ground-state energy, -
the theorem E-
G-
i=l
replaced by
must be IV
E
+
i=t
Eq. (3.52)
function of the form
Oui(r) Or
N
)
OV,ij (r)
(r
+ r=ri
Or
)r=ri-rj (3-55)
spherically symmetric potential the operator r-ar- reduces simply r-4-. If the calculation of matrix elements of the. operator WA is not dr
For to
a
difficult,
the virial theorem
When the
(!PIWAI(P) Here the
potential =
((filWA
W
can
be used
depends
+A
(9
as
on a
WI-P)
-
A
in the Coulombic
parameter A, d
dA
we
case.
obtain
(3.56)
E(A).
theorem is used to express the expecW in terms of the energy eigenvalue E(A). In a
Hellmann-Feynman
tation value of
A'&
molecular system X may be a set of parameters which stand for the positions of nuclei and if W consists of only the Coulomb potentials
-W simply reduces WA + A-bX plication
of this relation.
to -W. See
Complement
8.2 for
an
ap-
4. Stochastic variational method
approach to the variational solution of quantumproblems is to diagonalize the Hamiltonian in a state space spanned by some appropriate functions TV (a-,) Tf (a2) Tf (CeK). The applicability of this approach is, however, very limited, because the diagonalization may not be feasible if the dimension K of the state space is very large. This is typical in many-particle problems
The most direct
mechanical bound-state
7 ...I
I
such
as
the Hubbard model
or
the nuclear shell model. This method
approach", because one sets up a basis in a well-defined way, e.g., by using a complete set of states that contains no parameters, and then obtains the energy by a diagonalization. Another possibility is basis optimization, which is actually designed to avoid the problem of the huge basis dimension in the direct approach. In this case one specifically selects the basis states that are really essential to get the energy and the wave function of the syscan
be called
a
"direct
certain accuracy. It is obvious that this selection may be state-dependent: Some functions might be adequate to describe the
tem to
a
but
ground state,
some
others would be
more
appropriate to ground state
when the
approx-
and the
particularly spatial extensions. The stochastic variational method uses this second route by selecting the most appropriate basis functions in a trial and error procedure. imate
an
excited state,
excited state have different
4.1 Basis
optimization
It goes without saying that the quality of the variational approximation crucially depends on the choice of the basis functions. Our
primary aim here is-
choose basis functions 1.
They
can
be
IV-particle problems. For this that meet the following requirements:
to solve
easily generalized
for
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 39 - 63, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
an
N-body system.
we
will
4. Stochastic variational method
40
2. Their matrix elements
They
3.
are
analytically calculable. easily adaptable to the permutational symmetry are
of the
system.
They
4.
are
flexible
enough
to
approximate
even
rapidly changing
functions.
important condition (3) is non-trivial because the permutational symmetry looks very complicated when expressed in terms of the relThe
ative coordinates to be used.
A
possible
choice for the basis functions
1 exp
fillfilling the
above condi-
Eqs. (2.23)-(2.25):
tions is the correlated Gaussian of
-1 N-1
c
Ax)
NE E Aij
exp
i=1
xi
-
xj
j=1
IV
expf -2
E
aij (ri
-
(4.1)
rj
i>i=l
Aij
equivalently, aij are nonlinear paxameters are spherically symmetric. To take into account non-spherical states, the basis function has to be multiplied by an appropriate orbital angulax function. In addition to the spatial degree of freedom, the particles may have other degrees of freedom, such as spin and flavor, and thus the function has also to be multiplied by suitable trial functions in these additional spaces. These functions may bring other parameters or sets of quantum numbers. These sets of quantum numbers (e.g., total and intermediate spins, orbital angular The matrix elements
or,
of the basis. These functions
momenta,
etc.)
be considered
can
often be referred to
as
trial function will be
as
channels in the
given
in
discrete parameters, and will following. (More details on the
Chap. 6.)
The actual form of the basis function is not very important at this stage. The above discussion serves to draw the reader's attention to the fact that the basis function
depends
on
many
and discrete parameters. The parameters define the
linear, nonlinear shape of the basis
function and determine how well the variational function space contains the true eigenfunction. To find the best possible solution, one has to
optimize the paxameters. To have
a
crude guess of how much
work the optimization amounts to, let us consider an N-particle system with the simplest basis function (4.1). This correlated Gaussian has ea,r
N(N
-
1)/2 parameters, and, by assuming
combination of K
functions,
-we
face
an
that
we
need
a
lin-
optimization problem of
4.1 Basis
K(N(N 1) /2) -
the number of
41
paxameters. Tb is number increases quadratically with
particles. By taking
N
=
4 and K
end up with 1200 parameters. The main problem of the minimization of
case,
optimization
=
200
as a
typical
we
nipresence of local minima. A local function reaches
a
minimum in
a
function is the
om-
point where the
finite interval of variables and the
number of such minima tends to increase
of the
a
minimum is the
exponentially
with the size
are plenty problem. optia function, and these optimizations can be divided into two categories: the deterministic and the stochastic optimizations. A deterministic optimization moves downwards on the slope of the function according to a certain well-defined strategy. There exist many elaborated algorithms (conjugate gradient, Powell (direction set), etc. [141) and they are deterministic in the sense that, starting from a given point, they always reach the same (local or global) minimum. The drawback of these techniques is that they are time consuming and tend to converge to whichever local minimum they first encounter. The solution in these cases may not be the global minimum but a local minimum. These methods are sensitive to the starting point and are
There
of different methods for the
mization of
unable to search further for
a
better solution after
a
local minimum is
reached.
Stochastic optimizations address the problem of finding the global large number of undesired local minima
minimum in the presence of a by making random steps [15,
161.
One can, for
example, start deterstarting points and then pick up the minimum of these. Numerous strategies have been developed in the last few years, e.g., simulated annealing [171, genetic algorithm [18] etc. The simplest (and actually not very economical) stochastic optimization is a random search where one picks up random points and tries to find the minimum. This may not sound very sophisticated, but the optimization with a random trial and error procedure seems to be the most efficient one. In some cases it would be nearly impossible to apply other strategies than simple random trials. To reduce the load of optimization, an alternative is to shift the burden of minimization from a large number of parameters to a smaller number of more sensitive, "tempering", parameters. Several such possibilities have been explored, e.g., geometric progression [19, 20], random tempering [21, 22, 231, and Chebyshev grid [241. The common property of these methods is that they use a "grW in the parameter space. The grid is given by some ad hoe rule and each point of ministic searches from several random
4. Stochastic variational method
42
grids defines a basis function. The grid can be defined by some simple functions which may depend on some additional- parameters to be optimized. The number of parameters contained in the functions which define the grid is chosen to be much smaller than that of the original function to be optimized. For example, in the case of a three-particle system, each of the basis functions has three parameters: All, A12 A21 and A22 or a12, a13 and C923- Some COnVenient the
=
choices for basis parameters
are
shown in Table 4.1.
Table 4. 1. Choice of parameters. In the random tempering p is an index to a prime number that is used to generate pseudo-random numbers.
denote
See
Eq. (4.8) for the
Geometric
All
=
=
A12
=
i, i
>.
progression -2
(aiqk-i) (a2q2-1) I
-2
k
A22
notation
+d2 < kp + I > exp(d3 < k,p + 2 > +d4 < k,p + 3 > exp(d5 < k,p +4 > +d6 < k,p + 5 >
,
...
...
M2)
M3)
Chebyshev gTid All
=
A22
=
A12
=
( a2tan ( altan
0
7r
2k-1
2
2 mi
7r
2k-I
2
2M2
4.2 A
distribute
certain number of basis functions to
a
part of the
wave
function and then
the basis elements in
4.2 A
practical example
regions
one
might
43
approximate the bulk
increase the
density of
where finer resolution is needed.
practical example
point of the previous section, let us consider an example for basis optimization. The example will at the same time provide insight into some other aspects of the methods as well. We consider the system of a positron and two electrons, Ps-, used in Chap. 1. The energy of this system has been very accurately calculated by various To illustrate the
approaches and
(a.u.). (Energy
it has been found to be -0.262005 in atomic units
given in a.u. throughout this chapter unless otherwise mentioned.) The quality of the different optimization strategies used in this section can be judged by comparing their results with this value. Let the positron be labelled I and the electrons labelled 2 and 3. With the electron spins coupled to S 0, the orbital of the trial function the antisymmetry requires that part ought to be symmetric with respect to the interchange of the electron coordinates. The wave function is thus expanded as and
length
are
=
K
Tf
1
=ECk(1+P23) exp (-2-;
,Akx),
(4.2)
k=1
exchange operator P23 is introduced to assure the symr2 and X2 rl metry requirement. The coordinates are x, matrix 2 with three (rI + r2)/2 r3, and Ak is a 2 x symmetric nonlinear parameters All, A12 and A22. The wave function Tf has 3K parameters to be optimized. The linear parameter Ck is determined by solving the generalized eigenvalue problem (3.10). To reach the accuracy required in atomic physics, the minimum basis size of a three-body problem is at least K 100, as will be shown later. That means that even in this simple example we would have 300 parameters. This is already almost beyond the capability of most of the computer codes for optimization and this "full" optimization is out of the question for larger systems. The fact that the optimization of a large number of parameters is not feasible is just a small part of the problem. To have an efficient optimization one needs fast function evaluation as many times as required. There are two steps which are where the
=
-
=
-
-
4. Stochastic variational method
44
necessary to calculate the energy expectation value: The calculation of the overlap and Hamiltonian matrix elements and the diagonalization.
In
a
fall
required
optimization,
one
time increases
(a K3-process)
as
rediagonalize
the Hamiltonian
at each calculation of the energy. This is
load
(the
has to recalculate all matrix elements K2) and to
a
considerably
for
a small system. heavy computational Instead, one can try a partial optimization. One can, for example, fix the parameters of all basis states but one. In this partial optimizaeven
only one row (column) of the Hamiltonian and the overlap -nn atrix (the required time is of order K). Let -us assume that the Hamiltonian has been diagonalized over the fixed basis states. Then, in the successive step, only one row (column) is changed. As has been shown in Theorem 3.5, after the N x N diagonalization there is no need for an extra diagonalization to solve the eigenvalue problem on the (N + I)-dimensional basis. Consequently, the computational time required by the partial optimization is only a small ftaction of that of the full optimization, and, moreover, only a small number of paxameters (three in the present example) has to be optimized. tion
has to be recalculated
4.2.1 Geometric
First let can
us
try
to
progression
use a
grid defined by
a
define three different sets of Jacobi
which two
particles
are
connected first:
Sects. 2.4 and 7.6 and in these systems to be
given
Fig. by x('), X(2)
and
us
X(3)
(23)1, (31)2,
and
(12)3.
See
denote the Jacobi coordinates The trial function is
IT
assumed
in the form K
3
(P)
qf
Ckl P=1 k=1
with the
2.2. Let
geometric progression. One coordinates, depending on
1
exp(--l (-P)A(P)x(P))0(11)00(x(P)), 2
(4.3)
angular function
0(11)00 (X)
=
[Y1 (XI) X Y1 (X2)100 I
-
(-1)1-M
-: 2= ,+1Y1Ta(X1)Y1-m(X2)-
Here p denotes the arrangement channel and Y1. (,r) is
(4.4) a
solid spherical
harmonic
YIM M
=
7"YM (P),
(4.5)
4.2 A
where Yl,,, (i
)
polynomial
a
is
a
spherical harmonic.
practical example
The solid
45
spherical harmonic is (see Complement
of degree 1 in the Cartesian coordinate
A() is always chosen to be diagonal. Therefore, the k spherical part of Eq. (4.3) is considered a special case of Eq. (4.1). (See also Complement 8.4.) The trial function of type (4.3) is used in the so-called Coupled Rearrangement Channel Variational Method [20, 25, 26]. The basic idea of this approach is that, by taking into account 6.2).
The matrix
the different Jacobi sets, one can introduce various correlations. This method has been used with great success especially for Coulombic
three-body problems [201. Because of the symmetry of the trial C
(2) k1
The 2
=
x
rameters
function, (3)
cki
A (2) k
may A
-
on
the orbital part
that
assume
(3)
(4-6)
"k
-
diagonal matrix A(P) 1, (k K) has two nonlinear k and they are taken as a geometric progression
2
=
...'
(Ak(')),, In
we
requirement imposed
principle
ai(p) (qi ) (P)
one can use
k-1
(i
=
1, 2).
pa-
(4.7)
different geometric progression parameters,
ai(P) and qi(p), corresponding to the different arrangement channels and the Jacobi
coordinates,
that
is, they would depend on p and i in order even depend on the angular momentum 1. For simplicity, in this example we use the same parameters, a and q, for all. arrangement channels and all sets of Jacobi coordinates. The main reason for using the geometric progression as parametrization is clear: The number of parameters of the basis is reduced to just 2 (a and q), so the optimization is simple. Another reason for the choice of this specific parametrization is that the overlap integral of the basis functions can be easily controlled by a choice of q and thus the danger of the linear dependence of the basis functions can be avoided. (See Sect. 3 for the danger arising from the linear to
get better convergence. They might
dependence of the basis functions.) The disadvantage of the use of these diagonal matrices is that, without having some polynomials like the scalar product of Eq. (4.4), the energy does not converge to its accurate value. As is shown in Table 4.2, one reproduces only the first two figures (E -0.2618530) =
of the
ground-state energy without the polynomial part, i.e., by taking 0 in the expansion. only I
=
4. Stochastic variational method
46
Table 4.2. The energy of Ps- in different energy is -0.262005. E
arrangement channels. "Exact"
(a.u.)
Channel
Partial
(23)1 (23)1
1
1 =0,2
-0-2392726
(31)2+(12)3 (31)2+(12)3 (31)2+(12)3
1
=
0
-0.2609626
1
=
=
0,1 0, 1,2
-0-2619622
1
(23)1+(31)2+(12)3 (23)1+(31)2+(12)3 (23)1+(31)2+(12)3
At this moment
=
1
=
1
=
1
=
a
wave
-0.2068096
0
-0-2619717
0
-0-2618530
0, 1 0, 1, 2
-0.2619804 -0.2619816
comment is in order. As the
spherical harmonies
angular functions, complete may think that the partial-wave expansion using only one of the Jacobi coordinate sets form
set for
a
one
would be sufficient to represent the wave function. The convergence as a function of I is, however, very slow if only one set of the Jacobi
(The
slow convergence in the partial-wave expansion will also be studied in detail in Complement 11.2.) E.g., the energy calculated with the (23)1 channel using the partial waves of coordinates is used.
up to I
2 is
=
just -0.2392726, which
of the three-channel calculation
(E
higher than the energy -0.2618530) using only I 0.
is much
=
=
Since the lowest threshold of Ps- is the Ps+e- channel at the
en-
ergy of -0.25, this result indicates that this single-channel calculation cannot bind the system. Moreover, the expansion with I has for prac-
tical purposes to be truncated to low values because the calculation of the matrix elements of high I waves generally becomes more time
consuming. Table 4.2 shows that, by combining the expansion Jacobi coordinate sets, the energy converges faster and few terms of the partial-wave expansion are needed. By
in the
the first
only using
10
grid
points for A(') k be
a
600
=
(=
we have found the optimal values of the parameters to 2.6. The variational energy obtained with this 0.06 and q =
2
x
10
x
10
x
computational load 180300
alized
(=
x
with
601/2)
one
repeated
a
calculation is -0.2619816. The
particular basis
set is the calculation of
matrix elements and the solution of
eigenvalue problem
has to be can
600
3)-dimensional
a
gener-
of dimension 600. For the optimization this
few dozen times.
By increasing the basis
get closer and closer to the exact energy.
size
one
4.2 A
4.2.2 Random
practical example
47
tempering
Another
popular tempering method is random tempering [21, 22, 231approach involves the generation of (pseudo-) random numbers with the basis parameters defined by the following prescription: This
I
ak
1: dj < k, j >
exp
(k
=
1,
...,
K),
(4.8)
j=1
k, j
where
is a
with
=
function with
some
weight
=
function. The known function in
our case
is the correlated Gaussian and its nonlinear parameters are the integration variables. The simplest way to carry out the integral trans-
formation is to
the Monte Carlo method. The
quadrature points integration can be generated by the above formula. As this formula provides "good lattice points" for the integration, these nonlinear parameters can be thought to be adequate to represent the wave function in a variational approach. While the random tempering works in many examples in a superb way, one has to note that it has a serious problem: It often leads to (almost) lineaxly dependent bases. In our actual example, the best energy of Ps- with random tempering is -0.261872, and further hnprovement of this value was difficult due to the linear dependence. The parameters of the random tempering used are, in the notation of Table 4.1, ?nj 7, Tn3 5, di 4, d2 -8, d3 Tn2 4, d4
required
use
in this
=
-7, d5
=
-1, d6
The parameters
are
=
=
1, and the basis dimension nearly optimized.
-11,
di
=
p
=
=
is K
=
245.
4.2.3 Random basis
The above calculations have
suggested
that not all of the
grid points equally important grids give nearly the same energy. The explanation is simple: The basis functions are nonorthogonal to each other, none of them is indispensable; they are dense, that are
but the different
can
4. Stochastic variational method
48
will compensate any of thein can be omitted because some others for the loss. This property of the basis functions and the success of
is,
tempering suggest the idea of a completely random distribution of the parameters. To illustrate this possibility, let us generate K 100 sets of basis parameters in the expansion (4.2). The eleraents of Ak are randomly chosen from a "physical" interval: the random
=
1
1
0
ai e -2a(Ei-El )I 1+1:' 12 i=2 a,
(5.4)
El.
Clearly E(a) goes to E, when a goes to infinity. Another quantity called the asymptotic energy estimator is defined by
E(a, -r)
1 =
2T
This has the Jim -r--+O
(Tf(a) I Tf (a)) (Tf(a + T) I Tf (a + -F))
(5-5)
*
following properties:
E(a, -F)
E(a, -F)
In
=
E(a),
(5-6) +
=
E, + -In 2,r
-2a(Ei-El) e EOO I ai 12 i=2 af
e -2(a+-r) (Ei -El) I.Es! 12 J:" i=2
I+
(5.7)
'
a,
Equation (5.6) can be derived by noting that the left-hand side is equal to ( '1/2) -da.Lln(Tf (a) ITI(a)) and that the derivative can be easily calculated by Eq. (5. 1). It is clear that, for T > 0, E(a, 7) ! El and E(a, -r) converges to EI_ as a goes to infinity. In fact, the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method or the Green's function Monte Carlo cle to
out the
project point here is not
a
ground
In
general,
method
one
a
[40-44]
uses
state from the initial
construction of
mates the solution but
e-H'.
(GFMC)
a
good
e-Ha
wave
as a
vehi-
function. The
state space which
approxi-
calculation of the imaginary-tiTne evolution of
cannot
compute e-Ha
and H, do not commute, but
by dividing
=
e-(-ffo+H')'
the time
a
into
because rn
Ho
any smaH
Hyperspherical
5.2
steps Aa
=
a/n,
we can
(RIe-H0A'e-HIA'Ik) (RIe
-H,
IRI
=
expansion method
harmonics
approximate G(R, k)
in
=-
(RIe-"0'Ik) by
factorized form. Then the full propagator
a
ff _f G(R, Rn-1) G(Rn-1, Rn-2)
x
-
-
G(RI,k)dPfn-IdRn-2
*
..
be evaluated
use
several time steps Aa and
extrapolate
to
'
-
(5-8)
dRI
the Monte Carlo method. In
can
by
67
practice,
da
=
one
must
0 in order to
eliminate time step errors arising from the non-commuting nature of the kinetic energy and potential energy operators. the propagator (5.8) to calculate both the numerator and denominator of Eq. (5.4)
When
we use
statistical of
having QMC
the
errors
of Monte Caflo
Eq. (5.4), subject to the
E(a) a're
integration. Then the
in
nice feature
an upper bound to the ground-state energy may be lost in method. One of the most serious problems in the QMC is
minus-sign problem [43, 451. The propagator G(R, k) is not always positive. This makes it difficult to use importance sampling techniques based on the classical stochastic process such as a Maxkov process or a Molecular Dynamics technique in computing the
the so-called
propagator by the Monte Carlo method.
5.2
Hyperspherical
harmonics
expansion
method
approach which is based on the expansion of the trial function in terms of hyperspherical harmonic (HH) functions. Just as the spherical harmonics are useful to expand the angular function of a single-particle motion, the basic idea of the HH method is to generalize this simplicity to a system of particles by introducing a global length p called the hyperradius and a set of angles Q. Let us suppose that all of the particles oscillate harmonically with angular frequency w We
briefly
introduce
N
Using
N
2
Pi
HHO
an
2mi
+
2
rniw2Ir2
the Jacobi coordinate set,
one can
into the intrinsic and center-of-mass N-I
HHO
N-1
7r2
2yi
+
1
(5.9) separate the Hamiltonian
parts
/-Ziw2X2i + _2
7r2N 2rn12
...
2
N+ 2 'rn12---NWXNi (5.10)
5. Other methods to solve
68
few-body problems
where Ai is defined by Eq. (2.19). Among the 3(N 1) degrees of freedom for the intrinsic motion, -
the
hyperradius
by
p is defined
N-I
P
2
[lix?
(5.11)
The
hyperradius contains only intrinsic coordinates, but it can also expressed as E i_=, Mi(Ti XN )21A, which is proportional to the moment of inertia of the system (see Eq. (2.18)). The choice of IL can be axbitrary, The hyperradius is apparently symmetric with respect to the interchange of particle labels. The potential energy of the intrinsic 2P2. Just as the single-particle kinetic part is simply expressed as -Ilzw 2 energy operator is separated into radial and angular parts, the intrinsic be
-
kinetic energy operator is reduced N-1
h2
7r2
I: 21.Lii
2jL
i=1
02
[5;;72
3N
-
as
follows
4 0
+
L
-ap
P
2
(5.12)
p2
grand angular momentum, which is expressible in terms of 3N 4 angles S2. there is no unique way to choose the angles, one possiAlthough bility is to choose 2(N 1) angles &j and 0j, the polar coordinate of N k 1, 1) and the other N 2 angles -yk (0 < -yk E, xi (i 2 2,3,..., N 1) called the hyperangles as follows where L is called the -
-
=
-
-
...,
-
-VFILIV-1 XN-I V Ak Xk ,//-Ll x,
=
V/jL P COS7N-1,
=
- ,FA P Sin7N-1
=
Vrj-Lpsin-yjv-j
...
...
Then L is related to the usual
(k
Sin'Yk+1COS7k
angular
momentum
LN-D
a2
2
Lk
3(k
-
2
a7k +
+ COS
'Yk
-
2)cot-yk
Lk-I sin -YA;
...,
N
-
+
(k
4cot2-yk
2,
2), (5.13)
2
=
2,
siny3sint2.
follows
L2
=
la-lk
N
2),
1k
=
"Xk h
X
-irk
as
5.2 2
L1
The
Hyperspherical
harmonics
expansion method
=121.
69
(5-14) of L 2, called the HH
eigenfunctions L 2y/C (S?)
=
K(K + 3N
-
functions,
5) Yjc (Q)
(5.15)
by the quantum number )C which comprises K (K 5 eigenvalues of the angular operators. 0, 1, ...) Expressing the intrinsic wave function as a sum, over k, of products are
chaxacterized and 3N
-
of radial functions
Ep-
-V
RK(p)
3N-4 2
and the HH functions
Y)c(Q), (5-16)
RIC (P) Yk
/C
N-body Schr8dinger equation, after eliminating the center-of-mass motion, is reduced to the matrix equation for the radial functions the
d2
(_W [ dp2
E)
'C(C + 1) P2
21L
(p)
N
+
1: (YK 11:
Vii I yic) RIC, (P)
=
0,
(5-17)
with
L=K+
3(N 2
-
(5.18)
2).
The volume element is
given by
N-i
fj dxi
MIL2,
AN-I
P3N 4dpdQj
N-1 x
fj df2kSin3k-4,YkCoS2,YkdYk,
(5-19)
k=2
df?k Sin?ykd'OkdOk is the usual surface element. Because C is positive for N > 3-particle systems, it turns out that the "centrifugal baxrier" is always present in N > 3-particle systems even for zero total
where
orbital
=
angular
For the HH ation of the over one
momentum states.
expansion method to be practical, of course, the evalu-
potential
has to have
energy matrix elements must be feasible. Moreguide for the truncation of the HH basis, even
a
70
5. Other methods to solve
though
the
few-body problems
expansion converges with a few K values, because the deof the HH functions is high. It is also necessaxy to construct generacy the HH functions of proper symmetry for a system of identical particles. This is
a
difficult
HH
expansion method
(N
2.5, is less impressive (Fig. 6.4), but it goes without f (r) =
=
saying that it is fit by increasing
not trivial to fit that function. One
improve the the number of Gaussians, but the convergence might
be pretty slow. The last example shows that
adequate
in
some cases.
Let
us
with Gaussians. This function is it simulates the behavior of
a
try
can
Gaussian expansion may be into
approximate f (,r)
practically
a wave
zero near
function of
a
the
=
r
12
e-T
2
origin, and
system -with very
strong repulsive
core. The Lenard-Jones or other hard-core potentials produce such a function. Figure 6.5 shows that the Gaussians generally give a good fit to this function. By scrutinizing the inner
may
part of the approximation
reality
(see Fig. 6.6)
the Gaussians do not
produce
one can
exact
see,
however, that
zero near
the
in
origin, but
C6.1 Nodeless harmonic-oscillator functions
as a
basis
103
3
2
C,
-
0 0
Fig.
6.4. The
1
2
3
4
5
step function and its approximations by Gaussian expansions.
The solid line is the step function f (r) = I if r < 2.5, f (r) and the dotted, dashed and long-dashed curves are the K 20-term. Gaussian
2 if
r > 2.5, 5-, 10- and
expansions.
the
approximate function oscillates around the exact one even for 20 Gaussians. This oscillation may be very unpleasent: To tame the hard core potential, we need a wave function which is effectively zero near the origin. The oscillating function leads to numerical problems, which makes it rather difficult to obtain the solution of interaction has
a
very
problems
where the
strong hard-core part.
important completeness of the basis functions in L (square integrable functions), H1 and H2 (first and second Sobolev) spaces because the bound state in quantum mechanics is traditionally It is
to know the
2
formulated in L 2, and the mathematical solution of the
equation
is formulated in
H' and H2
spaces.
(The
Schr8dinger
space HI is
a
set of
functions whose derivatives of up to the mth order are all square integrable. Note that the kinetic energy operator requires the second order derivative of
a
basis
variational method
ple
in
[791,
and the
function.) are
The convergence properties of the Ritz demonstrated in H1 and H2 spaces, for exam-
completeness
in L 2 is not sufficient to
guarantee
the convergence of the Ritz method. The proof of the completeness in the space of L 2 and in the spaces of H' and H2 is presented in
[801.
This work proves that any function
can
be
approximated
to any
Complements
104
200
150
100
50
0
-50
-j
-100 0
1
2
3
4
5
r
Fig.
f (r)
6.5. The fimction
expansions. dashed
The solid
curves are
10 and 20 term
curve
the K
=
expansions
12e_,r2
approximations by Gaussian dotted, dashed and long5-, 10- and 20-term Gaussian expansions. The =,r
and its
is the ftmction and the
are
practically indistinguishable from
the exact
curve.
0.002
.
.
.
.
.
i
.
.
I
I
0.001
0.000
-0.001
-0.002 0.0
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.6
r
in Fig. 6.5, but the inner paxt is 5- and 10-term Gaussian expan i n scope and not drawn here.
Fig.
6.6. The
curves
same as
with the K
=
magnified. axe
The
out of the
C6.2 Solid
prescribed
accuracy with
spherical
linear combination of
a
that the number of Gaussians in the the parameters of the Gaussians
harmonics
105
Gaussians, provided
expansion is sufficiently large and
are
appropriately
chosen.
6.2 Solid
spherical harmonics The solid spherical harmonic Yl,(r) r1YI,(i6) of Eq. (4.5) is a 0. 0, of the Laplace equation, V2f (,r) solution, regulax at r The irregulax solution is given by r-1-'YI (f). The solid spherical harmonic is a homogeneous polynomial of degree I in the Caxtesian =
=
==
..
coordinate:
21+1 +
rlyl.(,P)
47r
(1 + Tn)! (I
-
m)!
p! q!
pq
(_X+i )p (X _iy)q Y
X
2
where p and q p + q
A+
Aiuigi,
(7.65)
Complements
144
where p is either I or 2. As B is equal to A + leads to the
following
X,
the
change B,
of A
as
given by Eq. (7.65)
modification of
P
B
---+
B+
(7.66)
Aiuigi.
Therefore the calculation of the matrix element for the above
change
of A results in the calculation of the inverse and determinant of the
special form of matrix, B + a, Aiuigi. When the modification is given by just one term of the form AuO, the Sherm an-Morrison formula can
be used to obtain
Aub)-'
(B
+
det
(B + Aub)
B-1
-
-AB-1u,6B-1,
1 + AbB-lu
(7.67)
and
(I + A,5B-1u)detB.
(7-68)
See Exercise 7.2 for the derivation of the Sherman-Morrison formula.
advantage of these formulas is appaxent: By knowing B-' and detB one can easily calculate the right-hand side of the equations, and the A dependence is given in a very simple form. To change A, therefore The
there is
no
need for the evaluation of inverses and determinants of the
modified matrix B
(which would require (N
get the desired results by
_
1)3 operations),
but
we
simple multiplication and division. When the modification of B is given by Eq. (7.66) in fiL11 generality, then the inverse and determinant can be calculated by using the Woodbury formula [141, which is the block-matrix version of the Sherman-Morrison formula. If one wants to change a few of the aij's or one-column (and one-row) elements of A at the same time, the summa ion in Eq. (7.66) has to be further extended appropriately. a
Exercises
145
Exercises
Eq. (7.12).
7. 1. Derive
Solution.The the
integral
case
as
of
a
=
0 is
simple.
1 00rnCar2-brdr
(-I)n
=
0
(_I)n By putting
fo
x
In the
case
of
a
>
0,
we
may
get
follows:
=
dn 1 dbn 2
bl(2,Va-),
1000e-ar2-brdr I-exp ( ) erfc( \,Fa dn
dbn
V
b
4a
a
the above
2
(7-69)
-
equation becomes
00
rne-ar2-brdr
=
V,-(_I)n
(
1
2
- fa- )
n+1
n
nt
k=O
(n
-
k)! k!
A (X)
gn-k (X) ,
(7-70)
where
fk (X)
=
A (X)
=
(_X2) (eXp (X2))
eXp
(k)
eXP(X2) (erfC(X))(k).
(7.71)
fk (x) defined Eq. (7.13). Remembering that the
It is easy to show that
above is
in
Hermite
not
(n)
(-I)n eX2 (exp(_X2)) difficult to check that gk(x)
.(X)
=
7.2. Derive
and
can
(erfc(x))
be
equal to the one given polynomial is given by (1)
expressed
_X21 V/,-X-,it is -
=
as
-2e
in
Eq. (7.13).
Eqs. (7.67) and (7.68).
Solution. Let X represent u,&. Then the inverse calculated as follows:
(B + AX)
-1
=
(B + AX)-1
may be
(I + I\B-'-X) -'B-1 CO
=
j:(-A)n(B-IX)nB-1.
(7-72)
n=O
special form of X, XB-'X reduces to cX, where the constant factor c. is given by OB-'u. Therefore repeated use of this relation leads to the follwoing result: Because of the
Exercises
146
(B -I.X)n B-1
B-'(XB-'XB-'X
=
d'-'B-'XB-1
=
By substituting
this result into
(B + AX)-' nothing
which is
=
(n
Eq. (7.72),
A
B-1
......
-
I+Ac
we
of at most
P(A)
obtain
B-'XB-17
(7.74)
+ Auivj, let
us
(B + AX)
=
-
=
ao +
aj.X +
-
-
+
-
(i, j)
with its
suppose that the determinant is a The function P(A) is a polynomial
P(A) det(B+AX). degree (N 1) and can be expanded
function of A:
(7.73)
Eq. (7-67).
but
given by Bij
1).
>
To calculate the determ In ant of the matrix
element
B-'X)B-1
as
follows:
aN-O:I F-1,
(7-75)
where the coefficient ak is calculated by k!p(k) (0). The rule of dif0 ferentiating determinants leads us to the conclusion that ak =
for k ao
=
2 because of the
>
P(O)
=
special
form of the matrix X. We have
detB. The coefficient a, is obtained
as
B1,
B12
B, N-1
V1
V2
VN-1
Biv-, I
BN-1 2
BN-1N-1
follows:
N-1
Ui
a,
N-1 N-1
IV-1 N-1
E Y uivj,6ij
E T ujvjdetB(B-')jj
i=1
i=1
j=1
j=1
(,DB-1u) detB.
(7.76)
Aij is the (i, j) cofactor of the matrix B and use is made of the detB (B-1)jj. Thus P(A) is eq ial to (I+ADB-'u) detB, relation Aij Here
=
which is what
we
7.3. Calculate the
want to derive.
one-body density matrix for the generating function
g: Pi W,
r)
(g(sf; X, x) IJ(,ri
-
xN
-,r'f)) (,5(,ri
-
xN
-
r) lg(,s; A, x)).
(7.77)
147
Exercises
(2.12) shows,
Solution. As Eq. W The
ri
-
be
can
xN
expressed
as
EN-I 1=1
argument made for the nonlocal potential in Sect. 7.5 in exactly the same way. The can, therefore, be applied to this case only necessary change is to replace w('j) with 0). The density matrix When the wave function pi (r, r) takes the same form as Eq. (7.46). has the proper symmetry for a system of identical particles, the onebody density matrix does not depend on the suffix i.
w, xj.
Reproduce the nonrelativistic kinetic energy formula (7-5) by using the formulation presented in Sect. 7.6. 7.4.
Solution. By using Eq. (7.50), the matrix element of the nonrelativistic kinetic energy operator in the center-of-mass system becomes IV
N
2
(FA'(-X)JE
IFA(X))
2Tnj
=
(FA, (x) 11:
(i)
(7rN-l)
IF",(X))
2m,
3h2
(FAI IFA)
(7.78)
2mici
3h2 / (2mx) for the nonrelativistic kinetic energy is f (x, m) obtained by replacing Vlfh-2q2 + M2 in Eq. (7.61) with h2q 2/ (2m). To perform the summation over i in Eq. (7.78), we need to know the special matrix element M9 N-1: k
where
=
N
VM
(U(N) )kI (TT(i)
kN-i
Let
us
vectors of
Uj(N)
TnI , M2 ,
....
(1, 2,
N)
can
0) i
recall that
...,
mv
can
Uj and
EE
-I
i
-
be obtained
by rearranging
same
time
i times. Rom this construction it is easy to
be obtained from
constructed from
N)
Uj('
(N)
in
Uj'
exactly
the
by rearranging the row we obtain (see Eq. (2.6))
Mi
for
1: k i
for
I
M12---N
UW I N-1
-(I
that
U(') i U
M
is
vectors instead of
(7-80) ) M12---N 'i
-
see
same manner as
but
the column vectors. Then
the N column
by rearranging the masses the operation with the cyclic permutation
at the
according to
(7-79)
IN-I
=
i.
Exercises
148
Using
this result in
0 for k
Eq. (7.79) and noting the relation
N enables
VW siimma
IV
i
n
3h2 -
2mici
over
3eT 2
with the matrix A
(7.5),
which
was
i in
being
+
X)
can
easily
given
(
j(kv)
U
as
be done to obtain
-'A!A)
(7.82)
by Eq. (2.11). This agrees with Eq. by explicitly subtracting the center-of-mass
defined
kinetic energy from the total kinetic energy. This exercise serves as an indirect evidence for the
formulation
-
(7.81)
(UJ)ki
Eq. (7.78)
(A(A
obtained
I
to obtain the desired matrix element
(U'(V))ki
-
kIV-1
The
us
E'V I=
in Sect. 7.6.
validity of the
8. Small atoms and molecules
examples for the application of the method to atomic and molecular systems. The interaction between the charged particles is the Coulomb force. The long-range character of this force makes the solution of the few-body problems difficult, especially in the case of scattering. We restrict our attention to bound states, where This
chapter
contains
many different methods have been elaborated in the
These calculations
provide an
excellent
past decades.
possibility to test the
of our method. Relativistic effects in atoms
perimental precision of today, which calls
are
efficiency
withi-n the reach of ex-
for very accurate theoretical
calculations.
8.1 Coulombic
systems
The systems of charged by the masses (MI jn2 ,
particles
can
be characterized and classified
mN) and the charges (qj,q2,...,qN) of distinguish systems formed by either equal (unit) or unequal charges, and depending on the masses of the particles one can classify the systems as adiabatic and nonadiabatic ones. ITI the unit charge systems of more than two particles the constituents form a molecule and the binding energy depends only on the mass ratio(s) of the particles. Atoms are good examples for systems with unequal charges. The distinction between the adiabatic and nonadiabatic cases is dictated by the possibility of a simplified treatment in the former case. In the adiabatic case the masses of a group of particles are considerably heavier than those of the rest. The classical examples are the molecular ion (see Complement 8.2). In these H2 molecule and the H+ 2 cases the electrons move faster, while the protonic frame may rotate and vibrate by moving considerably slower. This physical picture is expressed in mathematical form as the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, where the electronic motion is first calculated by assiimin the constituents. One
....
can
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 149 - 176, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
8. Small atoms and molecules
150
form
CkA k
JeXP
2
i AkX) jVk 12K+L YL
M
(f,-I") X Slus (8.1)
UkiXi
Vk
The operator A is introduced to impose proper symmetries on identical particles (antisymmetry for fermions and symmetry for bosons) of the system. In most calculations the index K is assumed to be zero or at most zero or one. In the case of the PS2 molecule of Sect. 8.3, K is set
equal
to
zero.
The details of the calculations
can
be found in
some of the system presented in this chapter. The vari[33, 84, 851 ational parameters included in each basis function are the elements of
for
the -matrix
Ak and the coefficients
Uki, which define the
vk. Since the Hamiltonian used in this
chapter
global
vector
commutes with the
spin operator, the variational trial function can be chosen to 'have a definite spin value S. The value of S influences the symmetry of the orbital part of identical particles. Therefore, possible S values 'have to be tested in general to obtain the ground state. For treating the adiabatic system of small molecules in Sect. 8.4, we use combinations of the generating function g itself as the variational trial function.
8.2 Coulombic
three-body systems
8.2 Coulombic
13-16
figures, that the solution of
lem is
one
three-body systems
the Coulombic
151
three-body prob-
of the most useful benchmark tests to compare different
methods. The accuracy pursued in Coulombic cases is not of purely academic interest, but highly motivated by the high precision of the For
experiments.
example,
the fine-structure
splitting of the
state of the Li atom has been measured with
(parts
per
million).
include relativistic
including
an
18 22p2pj
accuracy of 20 ppm numbers one has to
experimental and quantum electrodynamics (QED) corrections, To
explain
the
terms of the second- and third-order in the fine-structure
require very high accuracy. In addition to the accurate reproduction of the energies, another motivation is that in the variational calculations, even though the energy is good, other physical observables might be less accurately determined. The increased accuracy of the energy, as we will demonstrate, eventually will lead to constant, which
very accurate values of other observables
as
well.
three-body general (m+M+m-)-type C A B system with unit charges has been thoroughly explored [861, and the like requirement for stability can be phrased as an empirical rule: In masses" ac[861. charges have to be borne by equal or nearly equal cordance with this prediction, systems such as H- (pe-e-), H2+ (ppe-), Ps-(e+e-e-), HD+(pde-), HT+(pte-), or tdg- are all bound, while (ppe-) or (pe+e-) are most probably not. Here p, p, d, and t are proton, antiproton, deuteron (2 H) and triton (3H) respectively. In the latter case, the particles with opposite charges form an atom, which does not bind the third particle. Some systems, e.g., the muonic molecules such as (ttft-) or (tdft-), remain bound even for L =-;,k 0 orbital angular The
stability
domain of
a
"
,
momenta.
by
A second group of the Coulombic three-body problems is formed systems where not all the particles carry unit charges. The rep-
resentatives of this category are the helium atom (ae-e-) and the helium-like ions, where a stands for the 'He nucleus. These systems often form bound states with L atom
(ape-)
angular
has been observed
momentum states
We have
challenged
(L
our
=
=,4
0
as
[871 30
-
well. The
antiprotonic helium
and studied in very
bigh orbital
40) [88, 891.
method to calculate the
energies of
some
of these systems. In the calculations to be presented the number of basis functions superposed is mostly limited to be modest because our
primary
purpose is to demonstrate the overall
performance of the
cor-
related Gaussians and not to compete with well-established methods sharpened for these systems. We will increase the basis dimension to
8. Small atoms and molecules
152
reach
high
accuracy
only
in
cases
where such calculations
sidered to be important. The results of the calculations
are con-
axe
listed in
Table 8.1. Table 8.2 presents the parameters used in the calculations. The results are compared with those of other (mainly Hylleraas-type or
correlated
hyperspherical haxmonics basis)
calculations. Our results
reasonable agreement with other calculations. In most cases a basis size of K 200 was used in the SVM. The precision of the axe
in
=
results
be
improved by increasing the basis size as can be seen on the selected examples of Table 8.1. In these cases we reach almost the same precision as the other methods. The calculation extends to nonzero orbital angulax momentum states as well, including an e,,c 31 state of the antiprotonic helium atom or the a,mple for the L 3pe bound of the H- ion. These nonzero orbital angustates slightly can
=
lar momentum states
as
well
as
L
=
0 states have been
investigated
by using global representation. The recovery of the results of other calculations (which are based on several different representhe
vector
tations of the orbital part of the
usefulness of the
wave
function)
convinces
us
of the
global vector representation. See Complement 8.4 for tdl-t molecule with the global vector
calculation of the
compaxative representation. a
To illustrate the convergence of the energy and the expectation values of average separation distances, the results at different basis sizes
are
tabulated in Table 8.3 for Ps-.
increasing the itself. One
Actually
accuracy is the conventional
can
the limit of further
precision of the computer
notice that at the basis size of K
100 the energy the first four figures of =
is accurate up to six decimal digits, but only the separation distances can be precisely determined.
the basis size, the virial coefficient falls below
high
accuracy of the calculation that all the
calculation
are
By increasing
10-'0, showing by the digits
of the reference
recovered.
Quite a few very accurate methods have been developed to solve the three-body Coulomb problem. It is very difficult to go beyond their precision. This is especially true for the methods which have been elaborated for a given system only, incorporating as much physical intuition as possible into the trial function or into the solution. In contrast with these methods, we use the same trial function, which is of Gaussian nature and therefore it is not tailored to Coulomb problems at all. Still, as the examples prove, one can get a sufficiently good solution in a unified and automatic way knowledge about the systems to cope with.
in
without
a
priori built-
The real power of the
8.2 Coulombic
three-body systems
153
Energies of different Coulombic three-body systems in atomic basis dhnension. See Table 8.2 for the constants which are the K is units. used in the calculations denoted superscripts a, b and c. Table 8.1.
System
State
K
SVM
Other method
K
Ref.
Ps-
Ise
600
-0.262005070226
-0.2620050702328
1488
COI-i-
600
-0.527710163
-0.527751016523
850
200
-0.1252865
-0.1252865
90
200
-112.97300a
-112.9730179a
ttA
Ise 3pe Ise 1PO
200
-110.26210a
-110.2621165
a
UIL
1D'
200
-105.98292
b
-105.982930b
2250
ttA
IF'
200
-101.43131'
-101.43'
200
MIL MIL td[t
IS'
200
-111.36444a
-111.364511474a
[691 [90] [911 [23] [231 [921 [931 [231 [20] [20] [941 [951 [681 [68] [681 [68] [68] [681 [681 [681 [681 [891 [96]
H-
UP
b
b
500 500
1400
IP,
200
-108.17923
1D'
200
-103.40849a
-103-408481a
1566
'He
Ise
600
-2.9037243769
-2.903724376984
700
He
Ise 3se
200
-2.9037242
-2.903724372437
100
He He He
He 'He
-108.179385
2662
200
-2.1752291
-2.175293782367
700
IP0 3po
200
-2.1238423
-2.123843086498
700
200
-2.1331635
-2.133164190779
700
1-D' 3D'
200
-2.0556201
-2.055620732852
700
700
-2.055338993068
-2.055338993337
700
IF' 3F'
200
-2.03125504
-2.031255144382
700
He
200
-2.03125506
-2.031255168403
700
He
IGe
200
-2.02000069058
-2.020000710898
700
He
3Ge
200
-2.02000069062
-2.020000710925
700
VHe+
L=31
300
-3.50760
-3.50763486
1728
'Li+
Ise
300
-7.279913
-7.279913
He
Table 8.2. The constants used in the calculations. The of the electron
mass.
energy in eV.
Set
a
masses are
m,,=7294.2618241, mp=1836.1515. R. Set b
Set
c
Mt
5496.918
5496.92158
5496.918
Md
3670.481
3670.483014
3670.481
MI,
206.7686
206-768262
206.769
2R,,
27.2113961
27.2113961
27.2116
is the
in units
Rydberg
8. Small atoms and molecules
154
Energy and different separation distances for the (e+e-e-) three-body system as a function of the basis dimension K. The virial ratio 71 is defined by q 11 + (V)/(2(T))I. See Eq. (3.50). Atornic Table 8.3. Coulomble
=
units
are
-E
(,r2+_) (7-2
1 2
used. SVM
SVM
SVM
Hylleraas
(K=100)
(K=200)
(K=600)
[691
0.26200465
0.2620050648 0.262005070226 0.2620050702328
5.489
5.48962
5.489633252
5.489633252
8.548
8.54856
8.548580655
8.548580655
6.958
6.95832
6.95837
6.95837
9.65284
9.65291
9.65291
1
9.652
0.46
77
approach will
x
10-4
be
0.34
more
number of particles is most
as
The
or more
expedition
nium molecule
to
10-6
0.54
x
10-10
x
10-10
where the
than three and the method still works al-
while the other methods need tedious efforts.
particles
larger Coulombic systems
(PS2).
0.23
highlighted in the following sections, more
easily as before,
8.3 Four
x
starts with the
positro-
This exotic molecule consists of two electrons
and two
positrons. The possibility that the PS2 molecule or in general electron-positron system consisting of p positrons and q electrons form a bound system was originally suggested by Wheeler [97], and this question has been extensively studied since then. The existence of the positronium. negative ion Ps- (p 1, q 2) has experimentally been observed [981. The binding energy Of PS2 was first calculated by Hylleraas and Ore [991. To date, it has not been observed yet due to the dffficult experimental circum tances, and this fact has intensified the theoretical interest in solving- this Coulombic four-body problem [65, 100, 69, 101-1041. Actually the positron-electron annibil i n limits the
=
=
the lifetime of Ps2 to few nanoseconds. I-n
obtaining the
solution for the
PS2 molecule, it is useful to note PS2 is invariant with respect to the charge permutation, that is, the exchange of positive and negative charges. that the Hamiltonian for
The trial function should therefore either remain
unchanged or change
sign under the charge permutation operation. The ground PS2 turns out to be even under the charge permutation. its
state of
8.3 Four
or more
particles
155
The convergence of the energy Of PS2 against the increase of the basis dimension is shown in Table 8.4. The fact that the best vari-
ational calculation
[103]
in the correlated Gaussian basis is
already
at the basis size of 400 illustrates the power of the random
surpassed trials.
Table 8.4. The total energies (in a.u.) of the ground state and the bound excited-state of the PS2 molecule in atomic units. K is the basis dimension.
PS2
Method
(K (K SVM (K SVM (K SVM (K SVM (K CG [1031
SVM SVM
=
=
=
=
=
=
100) 200) 400) 800) 1200) 1600)
(L
0)
=
PS2
(L
=
1)
-0.516000069
-0-334376975
-0.516003119
-0.334405047
-0.516003666
-0.334407561
-0.516003778
-0.334408177
-0.5160037869
-0.334408234
-0-516003789058
-0-3344082658
-0-5160024
QMC [1041
-0.51601+-0.00001
possible existence of bound excited-states of the PS2 molecule [84, 85] by taldng all possible combinations of states with L 0, 1, 2 spins. By 0, 11 2,3 orbital angular momenta and S a bound excited state we mean such a state that cannot decay to any dissociation channels. The results of the calculation were negative in I (with negative parity) and all but one case. In the case of L of a second bound-state the existence S 0, the calculation predicts We have examined the
=
=
=
=
of the PS2 molecule. This unique bound-state has been found to be odd under the charge permutation operation. The convergence of the excited-state energy is shown in Table 8.4. Figure 8.1 summa izes the energy spectra of the bound states made up of two positrons and two electrons
together with the
relevant thresholds.
One may ask the question of why the second bound-state cannot decay to two Ps atoms in spite of the fact that it is located above the threshold of Ps (1S) +Ps(IS). Since the total spin of the state is to zero, it
that
they
dissociate into two Ps
can
have
equal spins
(ground state)
and the relative orbital
atoms
coupled provided
angular momentum
1. (Recall that the Hamiltonian preserves spin, between them is L orbital angular momentum and parity.) However, this is apparently =
impossible
equal spins are bosons and their L. Consequently, the PS2 molecule
because two Ps atoms of
relative motion
can
only have
even
156
8. Small atoms and molecules
0
Ps(2P)+e++e-0.1
-0.2
-
Ps(lS)+e++e-'
Ps-+e+
Cd -0.3
IP0
-
Ps(IS)+Ps(2P)
>1 0)
-0.4
-
W
-0.5
-Ps(IS)+PS(IS)
-0.6
Se
PS2
-0.7
Fig. 8.1. The energy spectrum are given in atomic units.
with L
=
I and
of electron and positron systems.
Energies
negative paxity cannot decay into the ground states of
two Ps
atoms, that is, the lowest threshold of Ps(IS)+Ps(IS). Since the energy of this L 1 state is calculated to be E -0-3344 a.u. (see =
=
8.4), (-0.3125 au.) of Ps(IS) + Ps(2P), this state is stable against autodissociation into this Table
which is lower than the next threshold
channel. The
binding energy of this state is 0.5961 e-V from this second threshold, about 40% more tightly bound than that of the ground state Of PS2 whose binding energy is 0.4355 eV from the lowest threshold. are
The expectation values of vaxious listed in Table 8.5. In the
quantities for the PS2 molecule
PS2 molecule we deal with antiparticles, so the electronpositron pair can annihilate. The second bound-state may decay either by annihilation or by an electric dipole transition to the ground state [851. The most dominant annihilation is accompanied by the emission of two photons with energy of about 0.5 MeV each. To have an estimate for the decay width due to the annihilation we have substituted
8.3 Four
or more
particles
157
Properties of the ground and excited states of the PS2 molecule. positrons; are labelled I and 3 and the electrons are 2 and 4. Because (r14) of charge permutation symmetry, some equalities hold, e.g. (r12) Table 8.5. The
=
(r32)
=
(r,34).
Atomic units
PS2
(L
are
used.
0)
=
PS2
(L
=
1)
(r12) (r13)
4.4871530
7.56881891
6.0332070
8.8575844
(r212
29.112633
80.173836
46.374735
96.085514
2
r13 3
( r12) 3 (r 13 )
253.04611
1041.3251
443.85244
1226.7955
(412)
2807.2718
15612.112
4 13
(r )
5202.0371
17939-574
(r 21) (r.3' -2) r12 -2) r13
0.36839693
0.24082648
0.22079007
0.147244820
0.30310361
0.16081514
0.073444303
0.032230158
(1'12'TI3) ('r12 'T14) (5(rl2)) (5(rl3))
23.187368
48.042757
12
5.9252651
32.131079
0.0221151
0.0112091
0.0006259
0.00014591
(V2) 1
-0.258001894
-0.16720401
(V1 V2)
0.1307732538
0.091656853
(VI'V3) 11 + (V) /(2(T))
-0.0035446132
-0-016109693
*
0.3
10-9
x
probability density
the
(J(r12))
,
of
into the formula
rannihi
=
47
x
10-6
electron at the
position of
a
positron,
[1021
(MC622 ) 2hc(TIjJ(rj-T2)jTf) 62
=
an
0.36
4ir-(hc)
4
hcaOI(5(rI2))i
(8.2)
equal to J0 (Tf 15(rl r2) ITf) with ao Roughly speaking, the Metime is inversely probeing portional to the probability. The Metime due to the annihilation is estimated to be 0.44 ns. This is twice that of the ground state (0.22
where
(,S(r12)), given
in a.u., is
-
the Bohr radius.
ns). dipole transition from the excited state emits one photon with energy of 4.94 eV. The decay width Idjp&,, for this transition The electric
8. Small atoms and molecules
158
through the reduced transition probability B(EI) dipole operator D.:
is calculated
electric
16v
Tdipole
':--
(E) 3B(EI; he
9
I-
for tile
0+),
-->-
(8-3)
where I
B(EI; 1-
--+
0+)
=
)7 I (Oind I DI, ,
_
M) 12
(8.4)
1
with 4
qi 1ri
Djz
X4
-
I Ylp (ri
-
X4)
IIIere X4 is the center-of-mass of the
(4.94 eV)
tation energy
B(El)
dipole
P-92 molecule and E is the exci-
of the second bound-state. We calculated the
value and obtained
electric
(8-5)
-
B(EI)
=
0.87e2a 2. The lifetime due 0
transition has been found to be 2.1
ns.
The
to the
branching
dipole transition is thus about 17 % of the total decay rate. Therefore, both branches contribute to the decay of the excited state of the PS2 molecule. Its lifetime is finally estimated to be about of the electric
The excitation energy of 4.94 eV found for PS2 is different by 0.16 eV from the corresponding excitation energy (5.10 eV) of a Ps 0.37
ns.
atom. This difference
to be
large enough to detect its existence, e.g. in the photon absorption spectrum of the positronium gas. Before discussing the spatial distribution of the PS2 molecule, let us recall that the average distance (r+-) between the positron and the electron is 3 a.u. in the ground state of the Ps atom, while it is 10
a.u.
first excited state. The root-mean-square radius
in its
(ri
-
X'j
)2),
culated to be 3.61
surprising a
system of
of the
a.u.
5.66 a.u., 1.5 times
if
seems
larger
one assumes a
ground
The
rms
PS2 molecule
is cal-
radius of the second bound-state is
than that of the
ground
state. This is not
that the second bound-state is
Ps atom in its
(spatially extended)
state of the
(rms),
ground
state and
a
excited state. To check the
essentially
Ps atom in its first
validity
of this
as-
sumption, we have restricted the model space to include only this type of configurations. This can be achieved by a special choice of
Eq. (8-1). The energy converged to -0.323 a.u., Ps(1S) +Ps(2P) system with zero relative orbital angular
the uki parameters of that is, the
momentum forms state of the
a
bound state with energy close to that of L
PS2 molecule, therefore this configuration
is
lik-ely
=
to
1
be
8.3 Four
the dominant
configuration in this molecule.
uration, the Ps- + e+
or
Ps+ + e- with L
=
or more
There is
particles
159
second
config-
a
I relative orbital
motion,
intuitively may look important because two oppositely charged particles attract each other, but it is barely bound (E -0.315 a.u).
which
=
1 state The average distances in Table 8.5 show that in the L the two atoms are well separated. In fact we can estimate the root=
by
mean-square distance d between the two atoms
d2
I'l +7'2
7'3 +7'4
2
2
(2(r12 ) 2
4
(,r213)
+
-
)
2
(8-6)
2(rl2*rl4)
The symmetry properties of the PS2 wave function are used to obtain 6.93 a.u. the second equality. Using the values of Table 8.5 yields d =
for the L
=
I excited state and d
state. One cannot
give
a
Arij
The correlation function defined
gives
(TfIJ(ri
=
more
-
=
=
(r,2
=
of the
(,rj)2
ground ground or
is
0
laxge.
by
(8.7)
r) ITf) on a
system than just various average
quantity can be calculated for the correlated Gaussians
by using Eq. (A.30)
or
(A.136).
0, C(r) becomes
monopole density.
C(r)
-
detailed information
distances. This Tf with L
rj
for the L
a.u.
geometrical picture
direct
excited state because the variance
C(r)
4.82
=
a
For the
function
For the excited-state
ground-state wave function of only r, which is called the wave
function with L
=
1,
monopole and quadrupole densities. and the electron-positron electron-electron the 8.2 displays Figure correlation functions r 2C(r) for the ground-state of the PS2 molecule. The peak position of the electron-electron correlation function is shifted to a larger distance than that of the electron-positron correlaconsists of the two terms of
tion function. The latter has much broader distribution and reaches
farther in distances
compared
to the
corresponding function
of
a
Ps
atom.
Figure
8.3
displays
the electron-electron and
electron-positron
cor-
relation functions for the second bowid-state of the PS2 molecule. As I state consists above, the correlation function for the L of the monopole and quadrupole densities and their shapes depend on the magnetic quantum number M of the wave function. Of course the M-dependence of the shapes is not independent of each other
mentioned
=
8. Small atoms and molecules
160
0.020
0.015
Cd 0.010
0.005
0.000 0
Fig.
4
8.2. The correlation functions
molecule. The solid dashed
the
2
curve
r
6
8
r
(a.u.)
2C(r)
for the
12
ground
14
state of the
PS2
denotes the electron-electron correlation and the the electron-positron correlation. For the sake of comparison, curve
electron-positron correlation function for
dotted
10
a
Ps atom is drawn
by
the
curve.
but is related
by the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. See Eq. (A.136). quadrupole density is contributed from only the P wave of the electron-positron relative motion, while the monopole density is contributed by both S and P waves. Figure 8.3 plots the correlation funcThe
tions for both
(a)
M
=
0 and
(b)
M
=
1. As the correlation function
axiaUy symmetric around the z axis and has a reflection symmetry with respect to the xy plane, the correlation function sliced on the xz plane is drawn as a function of x (x > 0), z (z > 0). The electronelectron correlation function has a peak at the point corresponding to the average distance of 7.57 a.u. The electron-positron correlation function has two peaks reflecting the fact that the basic structure of the second bound-state is a weakly coupled system of a Ps atom in the L 0 state and another Ps atom in the L 1 spatially extended state. The peak located at a larger distance from the origin is due to the P-wave component of the PS2 molecule. The hydrogen and positronium molecules can be considered as members of the same family as both are quantum-mechanical fermio-nic is
=
=
four-body systems of two positively and two negatively charged identical particles. But they are at the opposite ends of the (M+M+m-m-)-
8.3 Four
x
x
(a.u.)
(a.u.)
x
z
(a.u.)
z
(a.u.)
0 x
or more
(a.u.)
(a.u.)
161
particles
z
z
(a.u.)
(a.u.)
Fig. 8.3. The correlation fimctions rC(r) in atomic units, raultiplied by one thousand, for the second bound-state of the PS2 molecule. The z comI for 0 for (a) and M ponent of the orbital angular momentum is M (b). Drawn on the xz plane are the corresponding contour maps. =
=
8. Small atoms and molecules
162
type Coulombic systems called biexcitons biexciton and two
(or
biexciton
holes,
molecule),
is observed in
a
a
or
bound
variety
excitonic molecules. The
complex of
two electrons
of semiconductors
[105, 106].
See also Sect. 10.1. The biexciton molecule is characterized mass
ratio
o-
=
m/M. Apart
by the connection, however, their
from this
properties are radically different, e.g., H2 is an adiabatic but PS2 is a highly nonadiabatic system. Moreover, while in the case of the H2 molecule many bound excited-states have been observed experimentally and later studied theoretically, in the case of the PS2 molecule only the ground state and the unique excited state discussed above have so far been predicted theoretically. See also Complement 8.3 for the stability of the biexciton molecule. Figure 8.4 displays the dependence of the binding energy of the biexciton molecule on the mass ratio a m/M. The changes of the binding energies in the ground state (L 0) and the excited statues with L 1 and negative parity is si-milar. Both the ground and excited states become less bound by changing the mass ratio from H2 to PS21 though the binding of the excited state decreases to a somewhat lesser =
=
=
extent. The energy of the transition from the excited state to the
ground state is also shown in this figure. This transition may take place in an external field, for example. By increasing the mass M of the positively charged paxticles tbowa,rd infinity, one arrives at the energy of the C I H,, 2p-x state of the H2 molecule. This state is formed by an excited H-atom and a groundstate HI-atom. Consequently, a statement similar to the case of the PS2 molecule is valid for the biexcitonic molecule: The second bound-state of the biexciton molecule is of
a
ground-state
dominantly formed by
exciton and
an
L
=
an
interacting
pair
1 excited-state exciton.
The rule that the Pauli
principle forbids odd partial waves between identical bosons also applies to the biexciton with L I and negative The second bound-state of the biexciton molecule cannot decay parity. to two ground-state excitons. A somewhat similar situation exists in the 3p, state of the H- ion as well, where its second bound state cannot decay due to the parity conservation. By changing the mass ratio in that (M+m-m-) system, however, this kind of state disappears for oI and the Ps- ion is known to have only one bound state. =
=
Tables 8.6-8.8 show tem
our
results for various other Coulombic sys-
.
The tivated
investigation of the stability of positronic atoms has been nioby the use of positrons as a tool for spectroscopy (positron
8.3 Four
or more
particles
163
0.15
0.10
CU
0.05
0.00 0.0
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.8
to
M/M
Fig.
8.4. The
mass
ratio
o-
binding
=
m/M.
state, and the solid
energy of the biexciton molecule as a function of the curve is the binding energy of the ground
The dotted
curve
is that of the first excited state with L
Table 8.6.
curve
Energies of different Coulombic four-body systems
I and
=
is the energy difference, multiplied negative parity third, between the first excited state and the ground state.
The dashed
by one
in atomic
units. K is the basis dimension.
System
State
K
SVM
Other method
K
Ref.
PS2
Ise IP0
800
-0-516003778
-0.516002
400
[102]
800
-0.334408112
[107] [1071 [1071 [1031
PS2
Ise 1PO
600
-7.478058
-7.47806032
1589
Li
1000
-7.410151
-7.410156521
1715
Li
'D'
1000
-7-335520
-7.335523540
1673
'HPS
Ise
1200
-0.7891964
-0.7891794
Li
8. Small atoms and molecules
164
Table 8.7.
Energies of different Coulombic five-body systems
in atomic
units. K is the basis dimension. The Li- energy with K = oo is the extrapolated one [1091, where E = -7.500577 is given by multiconfiguration
Hartree-Fock calculations with K
=
2997.
System
State
K
SVM
Other method
K
Ref.
Be
Ise Ise
500
-14.6673
-14.667355
1200
600
-7-50012
-7-50076
00
[1081 [1091
200
-0-5493
1000
-7.53218
Li-
Ise Ise
(27r+, 3,-1-) Li +
e+
Table 8.8.
Energies
of different Coulombic
six-body systems
in atomic
units. K is the basis dimension.
System
State
K
SVM
(37,-+,37r-)
IS' Ise Ise
300
-0.820
600
-7.73855
1000
-14.692
Li + Ps
Be+e+
annihilation
spectroscopy) is whether
in condensed matter
physics.
An
intrigu-
or a chemically stable system containing a ing question positron or a positronium could be formed in the various targets. This
not
be answered
only by a sophisticated calculation or experiment because the mechanism responsible for binding the positron to the neutral atom is the polarization potential present in the atom+e+ system. The boundness of the hydrogen positride (positronium hydride) HPs was predicted theoretically by Ore [99] in 1951 and it has recently been created and observed in collisions between positrons and methane [1101. The properties of HPs is discussed in [851. The use of the SVM proved for the first time that the positronic lithium (Li+e-r [1111 and the positronic beryllium (Be+e+) [1121 are stable. We see from the tables that the positron separation energy of the positronic lithbun is 0.054 a.u. Below the Li+e+ channel the Li++Ps channel is question
can
open and the
energy of the
positronic lithium is only 0.0022 a.u. against the dissociation into the Li++Ps channel. A calculation has to be accurate at least to 10-3 a.u. to answer the stability of the
binding
positronic litbium. Likewise, the positron separation energy of the
Be+e+ system
typically
is
only
about 0.01
0.025
a.u.
a.u.
one
Due to the
tiny binding energies of
has to. be able to reach
high
accuracy
8.4 Small molecules
165
6-particle systems. A naive picture of these systems is that the positron orbiting around the neutral atom slightly polarizes the negative electron cloud, and the positron is bound by the resulting in these
attraction.
(as a fall N-body solution) for the investigation of the stability of much larger systems (e.g. Sodium plus positron) To extend the method
question. One can, however, try to use a "frozen core approximation?'. In this approximation the positively charged core is considered to be passive (its polarization is neglected) and the problem is is out of
model space where the single-paxticle orbitals are orthogonal to the core orbitals. One has to solve the modified Schr6dinger
solved in
a
equation of the form
(H + AP)Tf
=
with
ETI-
(8-8)
Oi) (Oi
P iGoccupied
produces wave functions that are orthogonal to the core orbitals provided the positive constant A is large enough. The projection operator P is an example for the nonlocal potentials discussed in Sect. 7.5. See also Complement 11.4. One can validate this approximation by comparing it to the "exact" fuU N-body calculation for Li+e+. This approximation turns out to be very accurate, reproducing the first six digits of the result of the full calculation [1121. Assuming that the accuracy holds for larger systems, one seems to find the stability of positronic sodium (Na+e+) [1121. which
8.4 Small molecules As it case
was
mentioned at the
demands
a
special
beginning
of this
assumed to take combinations of the form
g(s; A, x) where
Aij
1
and
functions. The x.
exp
=
Note that
s
(_2
=
is
a
Mx +
f8li S21
"generator x
chapter, the molecular
treatment. The variational trial function is
-7
(6.19)
9x),
SN-11
coordinates"
(8.9) are s
parameters of the basis
are
chosen
conforming
to
set of relative coordinates. Our aim here is
to calculate the energy of the
system which
can
be
directly
com-
pared to experiment without recourse to the adiabatic treatment like the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Each basis function includes !V(IV 1) /2 + 3 (IV 1) parameters to be optimized. These parameters -
-
8. Small atoms and molecules
166
describe various correlations. The matrix A describes the electronic
correlations and motions, while the generator coordinate s makes the function flexible and allows us to represent several "peaks" of
wave
the
density
the holes
distribution
when, for example
in the
well separated and the electrons them. around 0 the function By choosing s are
=
hydrogenic limit, "atomic orbits"
axe on
(8.9)
'has its
maxhnum
origin and this limit is suitable around a1, when m/M the paxticles with nearly equal masses are moving equally fast. At the hydrogenic limit, when the motion of the heavy particles are very slow compared to the light ones, the density distribution has several peaks at the
=
=
axound the attractive centers, and to represent these configurations need to shift the maximum of the trial functions out of the origin
we
by choosings appropriately. The usefulness of the generator coordinates in the basis function (8.6) can be understood by the following example. Let us try to calculate the energy of the IH+ this basis with and without 2 by using (that is by setting them to zero) the generator coordinates. The latter
form
corresponds
to the correlated Gaussians for L
of that system is -0.6026
basis of K
=
a.u..
300 Gaussians
0. The energy Without the generator coordinates a
give
-0.5999
a.u.
=
for this molecule. The
inclusion of the generator coordinate immediately h-nproves the con10 basis states vergence and one can get -0.6024 a.u. by using K =
only! Table 8.9 shows ions
consisting
examples
of calculations for the molecules and the
of protons and electrons..
Table 8.9. Ground state
energies of small molecules
in atomic units. K is
the basis dimension.
System
K
"OH+ 2 0OH2 "OH+ 3
SVM
Other method
K
Ref.
50
-0.602634429
-0.602634214
160
100
-1-17445
-1-174475714
1200
100
-1.34351
-1.343835624
600
[1131 [1131 [1141
167
Complements 8.1 The cusp condition for the Coulomb potential It is desirable that the trial function satisfies the proper asymptotic behavior or the special boundary condition as demanded by a given
special boundary condition, the cusp condition [115] known for the Coulomb potential, by using the hydrogen atom as an example. The local energy for the hydrogen atom is given by Hamiltonian. We discuss
192 Tf
h2 1
Ej"'c
-r-2
-
2m Tf
where hl is the
a
angular
h2
2 (9Tf + r
-5r- )
momentum
+
1
.M r2 Tf
e2
2
1 IIf
(8-10)
r
operator. As
was
discussed in
Sect. 3.2, the local energy for the exact wave function turns out to be a constant. The Coulomb potential in the local energy gives a singular 0. For the local energy to be a constant, this singular behavior at r =
behavior must be
for
compensated
by
the kinetic energy term. For
an S wave, where the wave function Tf has no angular dependence, 12Tf 0 and the constancy of El.,r requires that the second term in =
the bracket in
Eq. (8.10) cancel
the
singular
behavior of the Coulomb
potential: I
aTf)
Tf 9r
-me
2
h2
r=o
ao
where ao is the Bohr radius. It is easy to see that an exponenexp(-r/a) for the radial part of the ground-state wave
tial form of
function leads to sen
a
constant local
density
if and
only
if
to be ao. The constant of the local energy is then
-0/(2ma2) drogen
=
_Me4/(2h2)
=
-El
as
expected,
atom ionization energy without the
a
is cho-
equal
where E, is the
to
hy-
proton recoil effect, that
is, the well-known energy of 13.6 eV.
angular dependence, it has to take care I/r singularities. Then Tf may be expressed I/r as a product of radial and angular parts: Tf r'R(r)Y(S?), where s 0. is a positive constant and R(r) is assumed to be nonzero at r Substituting Tf into Eq. (8.10), we obtain For
a
general
case
when Tf has
and
of both the
2
=
=
h?
Eloc
2m +
1
a2 R
( R -5r-2
h2 1 2 __1 Y 2Tar2 Y
+
2(s + 1) r
1 M
R 9r
+
8(8+1) r2
2 -
_.
r
(8-12)
Complements
168
As R does not vanish at
r
0, 1IR gives
=
origin. The condition that the local following result:
( OR) 9r
1
I
R
(s + 1)ao'
=o
We know that the second
no
singularity
at the
energy is constant leads to the
12y
equation
rise to
=
(8.13)
S(S + 1)y
is satisfied if and
only
if
s
is
a
positive integer 1, and then the first equation determines the correct behavior of R near the origin as R(r) oc exp(-r/(l + I)ao). Equations
(8.11)
(8.13)
known to be the cusp conditions. Let us attempt to solve the S-wave hydrogen atom variationally with Gaussian basis functions, exp[-(a/2)(r/a0)2J' where a is a vari-
and
are
ational parameter. We functions that lead to
use a
Gaussians
as
an
example of such basis
rather accurate solution but
are
poor in
satisfying the cusp condition. When a single basis function is used, the optimal value of a is 16/(9z), giving the minimum energy of -8/(37t-)EI -0.849EI. A combination of a few terms approximates the ground-state energy quite well. The parameter values of a are determined by the SVM. Table 8.10 shows sample results of such calculations obtained with the code given in [81]. The calculation with five Gaussians already reproduces the energy up to three digits. The wave function obtained with ten Gaussians can reproduce both the energy and the mean values of r and I/r fairly accurately. The over=
lap of the wave function with the exact wave function is very close to unity. We may conclude that the Gaussian basis can predict physical quantities to high accuracy. Of course, the solution does not satisfy the proper asymptotic behavior at large distances and, moreover, always gives zero for the cusp value of Eq. (8.11). The local energy displayed in Fig. 8.5 for the variational wave function indicates that with increasing K it tends to show smaller and smaller deviations from the exact wave function except for the singular points mentioned above. The local energy at large r deviates from the correct value because the Gaussian basis has the wrong asymptotic behavior. It is possible to generalize the above arguments for the cusp value in a system of particles interacting via Coulomb potentials. Evaluating the cusp value for a pair of particles with charges qj and qj, we obtain
(If 16(ri
-
2'j) alriarj I Of)
(T/IJ(ri
-
rj)ITI')
I-tijqiqj h2
(8-14)
where tzij is the reduced mass of the two particles. The left-hand side of Eq. (8.14) is expressed with the matrix elements involving
C8.2 The chemical bond: The H+ ion 2
J(r)
=
J(r)/(47rr2)
used to test the
The cusp values for a pair of paxticles quality of the variational solution at the .
are
169
often
particles'
coalescence.
Table 8.10. Variational solution for the
hydrogen
of Gaussian basis functions. The last
shows the exact values. Ei is the is the Bohr radius.
hydrogen K
atom ionization energy and ao
E
E,
((_L_)-2) ao
atom with
a
number K
row
ao
((_E_)2) ao
ao
Overlap
1
-0.8488264
1.131774
0.8488284
1.499996
2.650706
0.9568351
3
-0.9939585
1.903352
0.9939409
1.491519
2.922759
0.9987560
5
-0.9996191
1.986219
0.9995692
1.499147
2.991284
0.9999446
10
-0.9999998
1.999700
0.9999958
1.500004
3.000014
0.9999999
-1
2
1
1.5
3
1
K= 1
0-, IN.
-4-
K=3
K=10
1 %
0
5
10
15
20
rlao Fig. 8.5. hydrogen
The local energy
curve
plotted for the variational solution
of the
atom. K denotes the number of Gaussian basis functions.
8.2 The chemical bond. The
H+ 2
ion
Quantum mechanics enables us to understand the chemical bond, responsible for the formation of molecules from isolated atoms. The chemical bonding phenomenon involves the delocalization of electrons in an atom to gain attraction from the other nuclei when which is
Complements
170
the atoms
close to each other. We take up the simplest possiH2+ ion, to understand what an important role the
come
ble molecule, the
Hellmann-Feynman
and virial theorems
[1]
of the chemical bond. See
play for clarifying the origin
for detail.
ffilly quantuin-mechanical description of a molecule is a complex problem. This problem is usually simplified by using the BornOppenheimer approximation, where the electronic motion is separated from the nuclear motion, considering the fact that the electron mass is much smaller than that of the nuclei. One starts with determining the motion of the electrons for a fixed configuration R of the nuclei and The
ground state, of energy U(R), of the electronic system. Then one assumes that,when R varies, the electronic system always remains in the ground state corresponding to R, that is the electrons follow adiabatically the motion of the nuclei. The chemical bond is then determined by studying the nuclear motion in a potential energy V(R) which comprises the Coulomb repulsion between the nuclei and obtains the
U(R)Let R be the distance vector between the two protons of the ion and
v
be the
vector of the electron with
position
respect
Ht 2
to the
center-of-mass of the protons. The electron motion is determined the Hamiltonian
equal
is m
the
to
IT
2[t
Note that R is
e2
e2
p2
H,e( R)
just
a
-
stage. The reduced mass jL where M is the mass of the proton and
parameter
2Mm/(2M + m),
(8-15)
IT + RI 2
Al 2
by
at this
of the electron. The electronic energy U(R) is the lowest of the Hamiltonian (8.15). It is clear that U(R) becomes
mass
eigenvalue
only. The Schr8dinger equation for the Hamiltonian completely separated in elliptical coordinates with respect (8.15) to the foci, R/2 and -R/2. We do not need its exact solution in the following discussion, but note that it is well approximated by the variational calculation using a trial function of the form a
function of R is
-01"
Tf
where at
s.
(Z' R) +'OL' (Z' R),
01, (Z, s) is the charge Z is
The
(8.16)
_
2
2
ls a
hydrogenic orbital
of radius
variational parameter and its
ao/Z
centered
optimal
value
is deternUned to miniraize the energy for each R. The optimal value 1 for R ---* co. At 0 to Z 2 for R of Z decreases froin Z =
=
R
--+
cc
the system will switch
over
to
=
a
configuration
of the
hydrogen
C8.3 atom and the
Stability
proton. Between these
of
hydrogen-like
molecules
extremes, Z is
two
function of R. The energy U(R) is -4E, (2M/(2M + and approaches -E, (MI (M + m)) for R oo.
a
m))
171
decreasing for R
=
0
By using the virial theorem (3-49) and Eq. (3.56) with A R, Ry7 R, we can show that the expectation values, (T) and (W), of the kinetic energy and potential energy of H,..(R) satisfy the relation
2(T)
+
(W)
+R
d
dR
U(R)
=
(8.17)
0. '9
Here we have used the fact that WA+R. aR W R d dR
U(R).
This
equation, together
with
=
-W and
(T) + (W)
(T) and (W in terms of the potential U(R) + (e 2IR), as follows:
to express
V(R)
=
(T)
(W)
=
-U(R)
=
2U(R)
-
R
d
dR d
+R
dR
For the chemical bond to must have
(T)
,
clude from
=
U(R)
=
occur
-V(R) 2V(R)
in the
-
R
+R
Rr-aR -U(R)
U(R), enables us
between the protons,
d dR d
dR
V(R),
V(R)
e2
-(8.18)
-
R
H+2
system, the potential V(R) --+ oc) -Er at some point
V(R V(Ro:) < -E-r have to be met. Since oc (see Eq. (3.53)), we can con-2E, at R at equilibrium (R Eq. (8.18) that, RO), the electronic
a
deeper
minimum
that is, V(Ro) Er and (W)
Ro,
U(R)
=
=
than
-
0 and
-- -
-
=
kinetic energy is increased and the electronic potential energy is decreased. The lowering of the electronic potential energy is large enough to cancel the
repulsion
for the chemical bond.
and
V(Ro)
-
V(R
-+
responsible 2.00ao calculation, Ro
between the protons, and that is
According to
oo)
=
an
exact
-
-2.79 eV.
challenging to perform a nonadiabatic calculation in which no separation of the electron and nuclear motion is made. The validity of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation can be tested in such a calculation. Furthermore, the development of the nonadiabatic treatment for a smaU molecule is of importance in its own right because the adiabaticity may be questionable when the electron is replaced with heavier particles like the muon or the pion. The excellent results obIt is
tained in Sects. 8.2-8.4 indicate that realistic nonadiabatic, calculations are
in fact
possible
in the correlated Gaussian basis.
Complements
172
8.3
Stability of hydrogen-like
molecules
The existence of bound states of systems composed of particles with unit charge attracts considerable attention. We discuss this problem here
by applying
of the
some
principles discussed
in
Chap. 3. always bound
The system of the hydrogen-like atom, (M+m-), is and its binding energy is equal to jL/2 in units of e
Mm/(M+m)
1, where p stability of a
=
is the reduced
-mass.
=
I and h
=
What about the
hydrogen-like molecule (M+M+m-m-)? This system is characterized by the mass ratio om/M. Two well-known examples include the hydrogen molecule (a < 1) and the positronium molecule PS2 (o1). Another example is the biexciton molecule [105, 1061. See =
=
Sect. 8.3. The value of
Emits,
0
1,
is the
where
velocity
of
v
is the
light.
mean
velocity of the
184
9.
Baryon spectroscopy
18001700-
El
E----1
L-J
=
16001500M
[MeV]
14001300-
12001100-
N
1000-
A
900-
1
1+
1-
3+
3
2
2
Y
Y
5+ 5 Y Y
1-
3+ 3i -2
Fig. 9.1. Comparison of low-lying baryon spectra predicted by the mesonexchange potential model with experiment. The solid lines denote the calculated spectra, and the shaded boxes show the error bars.
experimental
masses
with
their
(Continued
on
the next
page.)
One may think that the idea of the meson-exchange interaction acting between quarks is unfamiliar though it has produced the good results. To
judge
its merits the present calculations have to be
ex-
(prediction physical observables, e.g. factors, decay widths, etc.). The complexity of the NN interaction is basically due to the compositeness of the nucleon. As N, A or Z belong to the same octet family, it is natural to attempt a unified description of the NN, AN or EN interaction from the underlying qq potentials. This goal is at present too difficult to achieve directly on the basis of QCD. In so tended into several directions
of
form
far
as
QCD as yet presents no results, the effective theory formua microscopic quark-cluster model [1271 seems to be justified.
lated in
9.3
(Continued
from
Fig
-
1700
-
1600
-
model
185
9. 1.)
F-7
1800
Meson-exchange
t r--.7.
17.71
E]
-
r__,_T
H
p G=
r_.j
0
p"
-
1500M
[MeVj
1400-
13001200-
1100-
A
1000900
1
1
_2
1
2
_2
_2
1+
1-
3+
1
_2
1800
1700 1600
1500 M
[MeVJ
1400
1300 1200 1100
1000
900 3-
1
11
3+
_2
_2
1
_2
186
The
9.
Baryon spectroscopy
intermediate-range
attraction of the
cannot be accounted for
by
baryon-baryon interactions produces no con-
the OGEP because it
tribution between the colorless
baryons.
It is not clear yet whether introduced above leads to a realistic de-
meson-exchange potential scription of the NN interaction or not. It is probable that the OGEP combined with the meson-exchange potential is a useful, effective vehicle to obtain a reasonable description of both baxyon spectra and baryon-baxyon interactions at the same time. See, for example, [128] for the attempt along this line.
the
Few-body problems physics
in solid state
10.
This
chapter is a collection of examples of the application of the SVM to few-body problems in the field of solid state physics. The examples include excitonic complexes, biexcitons, and quantum dots with and without magnetic field. The biexciton
(or excitonic molecules), the bound state of two holes
electrons, provides
and two
an
interesting few-body problem,
since it
may be thought as a positronium. or a hydrogen molecule with variable electron and hole masses realized in semiconductors. The biexcitons
also often confined and
are
can
be modelled
as
two-dimensional
(2D)
systems. In recent yeaxs there has been much excitement in the possible applications of ultrasmall. systems with a length scale of 10-100
A,("nanostructures"). The technological motivation (in electronics and optoelectronics)
is that the smaller components
to manufacture very small
contain
faster. It is
possible
nanostructures, often called "dots", which
very few electrons
only a
are
(N
>
L, the
quantum dot is quasi 2D. The confinement is usually modelled by a harmonic-oscillator potential. This system is somewhat similar to an atom in
nature, where the "confining" potential is the Coulomb
traction of the electrons to
quantum dots
are
Throughout this chapter
we use an
tron. When the dielectric constant of
length =
a
effective
mass
me*
for
material is denoted
an
by
elec-
r., the
and the energy will be measured in "atomic units" with Bohr h2n/ (M*e2 ) and haxtree (two times the Rydberg energy) e-
radius a*
2R*
at-
nucleus in the atom, and therefore the often referred to as "artificial atoms". a
=
e2/(Ka*), respectively.
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 187 - 211, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
188
Few-body problems
10.
10.1 Excitonic
in solid state
physics
complexes
The excitonic
complexes have considerable importance in the development of semiconductor physics and spectroscopy. The bound state of a positively charged hole with an effective mass m and an electron with an effective mass m,* is called an exciton in semiconductor physics. The mass ratio ocan between 0 (hydrogenic limit cchange m*/m*h and oI (positronium limit) depending on the material and other factors. Like in the case of hydrogen, where not only the hydrogen atom but the hydrogen molecule (H2), or the H2+, H-, H,+ ions are bound, the system of N, electrons and Nh holes can also be bound. The latter system is called an excitonic complex. These excitonic complexes, including the charged excitons, have been subject of intensive experimental [105, 1291 and theoretical [99, 130-1351 investigation. The properties and structure of these systems strongly change with the mass ratio, and, by approaching the two limiting cases, one arrives at two completely different worlds. The interest in these systems has =
=
e
=
been intensified when the advance in semiconductor
technology has possible the fabrication of artificial nanostructures with diameters comparable to atomic distances. This restricted geometry has a prominent effect on the dynamics of the excitonic species. In the following we present the ground-state energy and some other properties of 2D excitonic complexes. The general Hamiltonian made
be written
can
IV.
H
=
i=1
as
pi, 2m,
N
i=IV'+I
N
j>i=N' +l x
2Mh
r"Iri
-
TC.
e2
+ 3>z=l
N,
e2
E where
Ne
pi,
+
N
e2
E E
rj I
i=1
j=N,+1
is the dielectric constant of the
material,
and the position
2D vectors in the xy plane. In atomic units introduced in this chapter, the Hamiltonian becomes dimensionless and the envectors
axe
depends only
(Note
that
do not need to
specify what dependence is hidden in the atomic units.) This is easily understood by introducing dimensionless coordinates and momenta by ri* ri/a* and pi* pil(hla*). Then the ergy
value of
K
on o-.
is used because the
r,
=
Hamiltonian
(10-1)
we
is reduced to
=
10.1 Excitonic N,
H
1
2
2P'
2R*
E
+
2
P
2(o-N,
+N
N
3
Z
i>i=l
N'-
E
+
-
j>i=N,+l
Jr
-
'r
3
7,
2 P'
N,) N
E E
I
189
N
/
0-
*2
i=N +I
+
complexes
i=1
j=N,+l
J'r j*
r
3
I'
At this point, a comment is due. What we consider here is a welldefined quantum-mechanical problem to be solved. This is, however,
experimental situation. In the realistic case there considered, for example the effect of other electronic bands, the possibility that the interaction is different from the pure Coulomb force due to the confinement in the z direction, etc. The discussion of the importance of these effects is beyond the scope only are
model of the
a
many other factors to be
of this book.
As the
problem here is practically the same as that discussed in the chapter of small atoms and molecules (Chap. 8), the same trial function is used (see Eq. (8.1)), except that it is tailored to the 2D case, that is, the position vectors have only x and y components. The results for case
o-
=
0 and
o-
=
1
shown in Table 10.1 for the 3D
are
and in Table 10.2 for the 2D
case.
between the 3D and 2D results is the
The most
large
striking difference binding
increase in the
0) in energy in the 2D case. E.g., the binding energy of R2 (with o2D is about 8 times of that in 3D. The increase of binding has been =
found
experimentally
Table 10. 1.
as
well.
Energies and binding energies (in a.u.) of 3D
of electrons and holes for two orbital
angular
cases
momentum and
of the
mass
ratio
o-.
exciton complexes
L and S
are
The asterisk refers to the states which
are
found to be unbound. The binding
energy is understood with respect to the nearest threshold.
E(o-i)
B(o-=O)
B(o-=I)
-0.500
-0.250
0.500
0.250
-0.528
-0.262
0.028
0.012
-0.602
-0.262
0.102
0.012
-1.174
-OM6
0.174
0.016
System
(L, S)
E(o-=O)
eh
(0,0) (0,1/2) (0,1/2) (0,0) (0,1/2) (0,1/2)
eeh ehh
eehh eeehh eehhh
*
-1.344
the total
spin of the exciton complex, respectively.
0.169
190
10.
Few-body problems
in solid state
physics
Table 10.2. Energies and binding energies (in a.u.) of 2D excito-n complexes of electrons and holes for two cases of the mass ratio o-. M is the z component of the total orbital angular momentum and S is the total spin. See also the caption of Table 10.1.
System
(M, S)
E
eh
(0,0) (0,1/2) (0,1/2) (0,0) (0,1/2) (0,1/2)
-2.00
-1.00
2.00
1.00
-2.24
-1.12
0.24
0.12
-2.82
-1.12
0.82
0.12
-5.33
-2.19
1.33
0.19
eeh ehh eehh eeehh
eehhh
(o-
=
0)
E
(o-
=
1)
B
(o-
*
-6-82
1.50
=
0)
B
(o-
=
1)
10.2
equality 2(r+-)
distances have to fullfil the
=
Quantum
dots
V(r--)2 + (r++)2.
191
Ta-
ble 10.3 shows that this is not satisfied. Moreover, the fact that the
Arij
uncertainties
(,ri2j
-
(rij 2
are
large
means
that
no
such in-
terpretation is possible. There is only one case where the uncertainty is in very small, that is the distance between the (heavy) positive charges with accordance in that In can case one the hydrogenic limit. assume, the adiabatic approximation, that the positive charges are fixed at the distance of 0.37 a.u. The equilibrium distance in the H2 molecule in 3D is 1.4
a.u.
Table 10.3. ratio
mass
Average distances in 2D biexcitons (eehh) as a function of the E.g., (r--) is the mean distance between the two negative
o-.
charges. Atomic 0-
(r++) (,r+-) 2 (r _) (r 2+) 2 (r _)
=
0
units o-
are
0.4
=
used. a
=
0.7
0-
=
0.67
1.26
1.55
0.37
1.14
1.49
1.80
0.47
0.93
1.16
1.38
0.59
2.09
3.19
4.33
0.14
1.69
2.95
4.33
0.31
1.29
2.05
2.88
1.80
dots
10.2
Quantum
Rapid
advances in semiconductor
rication of nanostructures called
[136, 137, 1381. electrons,
are
In
I
quanturn dots
technology
have led to the fab-
quantum dots a
few
or
artificial atoms
electrons, typically
2 to 200
bound at semiconductor interfaces. These few-electron
(2D) electron gases (MOS) structures are
systems arise when homogeneous two-dimensional metal-oxide-semiconductor
of heterojunctions
or
laterally confined
to diameters
comparable
to the effective Bohr
ra-
dius of the host semiconductor. The interest in quantum dots arises not only from the prospect of new technological applications but also from the desire to understand the in
physics of a few interacting electrons
external field. Needless to say, we concentrate on the few-electron where the effect of electron-electron interaction and their corre-
an
case
lation
seems
to be very
important.
192
10.
Few-body problems
The axtificial atoms
in solid state
consider here
we
of N electrons confined in 2D
physics are
modelled
by
a
system
by harmonic-oscillator potential. Before starting with artificial atoms in 2D we present a calculation for the energies of 2D "natural" atoms where the "co-ofi-ohn ' potential is a
Coulombic. The results for few-electron atoms and ions Table 10.4. The much
binding energies
are
again, due
are
to the 2D
given
in
geometry,
than in the 3D
case. Otherwise the properties of these laxger systems axe rather similax to those of their 3D counterparts. For ex-
ample,
akin to
3D,
the
H, Li
or
Be atom
can
bind
an
electron,
extra
while the He atom cannot.
Table 10.4.
Energies
of atoms and ions confined in 2D. M is the
nent of the total orbital
units
are
(M, S)
H
(0,0) (0,1/2) (0,0) (0,1/2) (0,0)
He Li
Be
momentum and S is the total
z
compo-
spin. Atomic
used.
System H-
angular
Energy -2.00000000 -2.24
-11-89 -29-87 -56.77
ex6mple of quantum dots considered here is a system of 2D electrons in a quadratic confiniD potential. The Hamiltonian reads as The
N
H
(V__
2m*
+
ivy)
M
where v., and v.
by
N
9
Pi
+
N
I _M
2
*WO2,r? +
e2
(10.2)
exp( IiUr),
(10.3)
-
2
are
the
x
and y components of the 2D vector
v
defined
10.2
Quantum dots
193
N
(10.4)
Uiri.
V
The parameters ui and A of the basis function SVMDue to the external field
are
determined
(the single-particle potential),
by the
the Hamil-
(10.2) of the system is not translationally invariant. Correspondingly, the basis function (10.3) is written in terms of singleparticle coordinates instead of relative ones. This basis function depends on the center-of-mass coordinate, and the energy obtained will be the total energy of the system, unlike the previous cases where the energy of the center-of-mass motion was always subtracted. The case of the quadratic confinement is very special, because in that case the energy of the center-of-mass can be separated. In general, for an arbitrary single-particle potential, however, this cannot be done. 1 electron is trivial and its solution is a simple The case of N 2 an analytical solution exists for cerharmonic oscillator. For N I a.u., the ground state tain frequencies [139]. For example, for hwo which is 3 is precisely reproduced by the numerical cala.u., energy culation. Not surprisingly, as is shown in Table 10.5, if the quadratic tonian
=
=
=
confinement is strong, the spectrum is close to that of a harmonic oscillator. In the realistic cases (hwo < I a.u.), however, the eigen-
strongly deviate from those of the harmonic oscillator. This example illustrates the importance of these systems: by changing the confinement one can "tune" the properties of these artificial atoms.
values
Energies of N-electron quantum dots with the z component of angular momentum M and the total spin S. The numbers parentheses are the eigenvalues without Coulomb interaction. Atomic
Table 10.5.
the total orbital in
units
are
used.
N
(M, S)
hwo
2
(0,0) (0,1/2) (0,0)
3.000
212.198
7.220
525.12
3 4
Figure
=
hwo
I
(2.000) (5.000) 10.600 (6-000)
10.1 shows the
=
654.45
100
(200.00) (500.00) (600.00)
energies of the ground and excited
states
of the energy of a harinonic-oscillator quantum) of two electrons as a function of the inverse square root of the oscillator constant, -1/2 If there would be no Coulomb interaction between the elec-
(in units
(hwo)
.
194
10.
Few-body problems
in solid state
physics
trons, the energy divided by hwo would be given by lines parallel to
straight lines is entirely interesting feature is that states but the ground state
the horizontal axis., The deviation from the due to the Coulomb interaction. Another level
crossings
always
occur
remains M
between the excited
0.
12
10
8
6
4
2 0
2
4
6
8
10
(hcoo )-1/2 Fig. potential
10.1.
Energy
with
an
levels of two electrons confined
by
oscillator constant wo. Atomic units
a
harmonic-oscillator
are
-used.
Quantum dots
10.2
195
3.5 3.0 2.5
2.0 ;-4
t__I (14
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
1
Fig.
3
2
4
(a.u.)
r
10.2. Electron densities of two-electron
quantum dots
as a
function
origin. The solid, the dotted and the dashed 5, respectively. Atomic 0.2, hwo 2, and hwo
of the radial distance from the curves
units
correspond to hwo
are
used.
1.2
1.0
0.8
A
0.6
0.4 0.2 0.0 0
4
2
6
r
Fig.
8
10
(a.u.)
(dashed curve), four- (dotted curve), (solid curve) quantum dots. The oscillator frequency of the
10.3. Electron densities of two-
and six-electron
quadratic confining potential
is hwo
=
0.2. Atomic units
are
used.
196
Few-body problems
10.
in
solid state
physics
peak density inreases with the number of electrons, that is, the equilibrium configuration is realized on rings of expanding diameter. In the case of N=4 electrons, for example, the paxticles may move along a ring, while they are situated at the vertices of a square to TniniTni e the Coulomb repulsion.
10.3
dots in
Quantum
magnetic field
A dramatic feature axises when the quantum dots are subjected to magnetic fields: The ground states are stabilized into magic-number states. When the
state
Tn
from
jumps owing
to the combined effect of the electron correlation and
appear
the Pauli
agnitude of the magnetic field is vaxied, the ground magic number state to another. Magic numbers
one
principle [140].
The Hamiltonian of the system is N
H
=
N
I
E 2m* (pi + e-A,)2 + -
2
C
1' Iri
i>i=l
Let
us assume
ward in the
z
,,
2
2
Wd 'ri
e2
E
+
I -M
-
N
given by
that
a
(10.5)
-,rj I*
homogeneous magnetic
field B is
direction. The above Hamiltonian
can
applied
down-
then be rewritten
in the form
H
P'
2m* N
+
-m w
2
2
2-
r?-
1 -
2
hw,
Ii,
e2
rdri
-
rj I
where u),
eB/(m*c) is the cyclotron frequency and w
We
the
=
V/W--22. rl4+wo
ignored magnetic interaction energy due to the electron spin. See Complement 10.1 for details. It is shown there that the part of
the Hamiltonian
corresponding to the single-particle motion can easily
be diagonalized by the use of associated Laguerre polynomials. Depending on the strength of the magnetic field, both the single-particle
10.3
Quantum dots
in
motion and the correlation due to the Coulomb
sive roles in
determining
function is the
same as
197
repulsion play deci-
the structure of the quantum dots. The trial
in the
For the two-electron with the
magnetic field
previous
case our
solution
section.
calculation is in
perfect agreement
[1411. The spectrum of two elec0) is shown in Fig. 10.4. See also
given analytical spin-singlet state (S Complement 10.1. The harmonic-oscillator frequency wo is taken as 0.01 a.u. The most intriguing phenomenon seen is the level hwo crossing. Due to these level crossings, the ground state changes with the strength of the magnetic field. This is shown in a magnified scale on the right-hand side of Fig. 10.4. If there is no Coulomb interaction between the electrons, no level crossing occurs. trons in the
in
=
=
10.0 18 9.5 16
9.0 14 +It
+Z
8.5
12 8.0
10 7.5 8
7.0 0
1
2
3
4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
(,)C/ ("0
(J)C/(00
10.4. Energy levels of a two-electron quantum dot in magnetic field function of the cyclotron frequency w,. The figure on the right-hand side magnifies the level crossing. The oscillator frequency of the quadratic 0. Atomic units are 0.01. The total spin is S confining potential is hwo
Fig. as a
=
=
used.
Figures
plot the energy levels of a three-electron total spin being S 3/2) against the orbital
10.5 and 10.6
quantum dot
(with
the
=
198
10.
Few-body problems
in solid state
physics
25
20
15
10
5 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
COC/ coo Fig. z
1.0.5.
Energy
levels of
a
three-electron quantum dot
component of the total orbital angular
IVI
=
6
(dotted curve),
and M
=
9
momentum M
(dashed curve)
frequency of the quadratic confining potential S
=
3/2.
Atomic units
are
used,
is hwc)
belonging
=
3
to the
(solid c=e),
orbital motion. The =
1. The total
spin
is
10.3
Quantum
3
4
dots in
magnetic
field
199
15
14--1
13
12
44
10-
9
8
7
6 0
2
1
5
6
7
9
8
10
M
Energy levels as a function of the z component of the total angular momentum, M, of a three-electron quantum dot in a low 3/2. Atomic 1). The total spin is S 0.2, hwo magnetic field (hw,
Fig.
10.6.
orbital
=
units
are
used.
=
=
200
10.
Few-body problems
in solid state
physics
larger (see Eq. (10.16)). The energy of the dots interplay of the single-paxticle energies and the interaction energy. By increasing the strength of the magnetic field, similarly to the case of low magnetic field, the ground state does -not take all possible values of M. By changing the magnetic field the states with M 3,6,9,12,... "magic numbers' become ground states. of these orbits is determined
axe
by
the
=
40-
35-
30-
25
-
201
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
M 1.0.7. The
Fig. hwo
=
1).
same as
Atomic units
in
are
Fig.
10.6 but for
high magnetic
field
(hw,-
=
6,
used.
The
change of the ground-state angular momentum quantum numbers as a function of the magnetic-field strength is illustrated In Fig 10.5 for a three-electron quantum dot with spin S 3/2. This figure shows the energies of the states with M 3 (solid curve), M 6 M and 9 orbital The calmomentum. angular (dotted) (dashed) culation shows that by changing the strength of the magnetic field the orbital angulax momentum of the ground state of this system is M 3 for w,lw < 5, it is M 6 for 5 < w,lw < 11, and then it =
=
=
=
=
switches
=
over
to M
=
9, reproducing the "magic number"
sequence
10.3
(M
3,6,9,..).
Quantum dots
in
magnetic field
201
States with other orbital
angular momentum never ground state and are not included in the figure. The previous examples dealt with spin polaxized electrons (S 3/2). Actually, spin polarized (S 3/2) and spin unpolarized (S 1/2) states compete to be the ground state as the magnetic field changes. This very interesting phenomenon is illustrated in Fig. 10.8. As the magnetic field increases, the ground state changes as (M, S) (1, 1/2) -+ (2,1/2) --+ (3,3/2) and so on. At low magnetic field the lowest energy state is spin unpolarized (S 1/2) and as the magnetic field increases the spin becomes polaxized. The orbital angular momentum (M) changes continuously (in steps of unity). =
become the
=
=
=
=
=
5
4
3
C5
2
0 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
(j)C/ (1)0 1-0.8. Spin (S) and z component of the total orbital angular momentum (M) quantum numbers of the ground state of a three-electron quantum dot
Fig. as
a
function of
denote M and
magnetic field strength. hwo S, respectively. Atomic units are
=
1. Solid and dotted lines
used.
202
Few-body problems
10.
10.4
Quantum
in solid state
physics
dots in the generator coordinate
method In Sects. 10.2 and 10.3 the correlated Gaussian basis of
employed not the only
Eq. (10.3)
is
to obtain the solution of the
quantum dots. However, th is is Gaussian basis function for the quantum dots. In fact, the
quantum dots offer
(8.9)
that
was
application of another basis function study of small molecules. That basis func-
very nice
a
used for the
by the matrix A which describes the correlated particles and also by the generator coordinates s which represent several peaks of the density distribution of the
tion is characterized motion of the
allow
us
to
system. In this section
consider the quantum dots in 3D and
we
field. The
state of the
apply belong
can ground 3angular momentum (for example, in the N electron case). The application of the basis function (8.9) gives a very simple way to obtain accurate energies of the dots even with nonzero orbital angular momentum, without the hassle of partial-wave expansion or angular momentum algebra. As this basis function has no definite orbital angular momentum, in principle one has to project out the component with good angular momentum quantum numbers. In practice, however, the converged wave function already belongs to the correct ground-state quantum numbers and the energy gain due to an orbital angular momentum projection is negligible. As the Hamil2 tonian and the L operator commute, the optimization of the wave 2 function filters out the eigenstate of L as well. As was mentioned in Sect. 6.1, this type of calculation is called a variation before projection. In the limit that the variational trial function is chosen to be flexible enough, the solution of this type of calculation would reach the 2 eigenstate of the conserved quantity like L to a good approximation.
no
to
magnetic
nonzero
quantum dot
orbital
=
In Table 10.6 the results of the SVM with the basis function of
Eq. (8.9)
is
compared
to that of
The shell model works
a
extremely
large
scale shell-model calculation.
well in this
case
because the
con-
fining potential is a harmonic-oscillator well. By choosing the singleparticle wave functions to be the eigenfunctions of this single-paxticle potential, the diagonalization of the Hamiltonian with the relatively weak Coulomb interaction between the electrons is simple and gives an accurate solution. The results of the two methods are in perfect agreement. This agreement shows that the optimization of the basis of
Eq. (8.9) finds the
correct
ground
state
automatically
even
for the
10.4
case
with
sis size is
Quantum
nonzero
dots in the generator coordinate method
orbital
angular
sufficiently large. An
momentum
orbital
angular
provided
203
that the ba-
momentum
projection
may lead to a faster convergence, but as it can only be carried out by a three-dimensional numerical integration, it would prohibitively slow
down the calculation.
Energies of few-electron quantum dots in 3D calculated by SVM and by a large scale shell-model (SM) basis'. L is the total orbital angular momentum, S the total spin, and -x is the parity. K is the basis 0.5. Atomic units are used. dimension. hwo Table 10.6.
=
N
(L, S, -ri)
(1,1/2,-) 4(0,0,+) 5 (1,1/2,-) 3
a
P.
(SVM)
(SM)
K
E
4.01324
100
4.01324
6.35025
300
6.3506
39 hwo 14 hwo
9.00331
500
9.0032
6 hwo
E
Navratil, private
communication.
SM space
(in hwo)
Complements
204
Complements 10.1 Two-dimensional electron motion in
a
magnetic field
vaxiational solution to the
previous section we have presented a few-body problems of quantum dots. In this approach a correlated Gaussian basis has been used and the problem has been formulated In a relative coordinate framework. The examples from atomic physics (Chap. 8) convincingly prove that this is a very powerful -way to cope In the
with the correlation between the electrons in the field of
an
attractive
only possible approach. One can, alternatively, use a basis set made up from products of single-particle states to diagonalize the Hamiltonian. The properties of these singleparticle states axe discussed in this Complement. The Hamiltonian of interest is given by center. This is,
H
however,
-2m*
not the
(P eAi)2 +
+
c
9*ABB
-
2
aj
I
+
vori)
2
+ X
i 'i
1ri
(10.7)
-,rj I
where m* is the effective electron mass, AB eh/(2m,c) the Bohr magneton of the electron, g* the effective g-factor of the electron, =
and
r.
is the dielectric constant of the bulk material. The
magnetic
interaction energy due to the electron spin is included in the Hamilltonian. The magnetic field is directed downward in the z direction, i.e. B
B
-
with B
> 0. For high magnetic field of, e.g. T, the value of ILBB becomes 0.5788 meV. The vectors ri
10
and pi
(0, 0, -B)
=
axe
2D vectors, which have
x
and y components. The
one-
body potential V(r) is to confine the quantum dots and is chosen to be quadratic, m* W02T 2/2. A typical value of the confinement en5 meV. By taking a symmetric gauge vector potential, ergy is hwo -
A
=
-r x
(P
e
+
where A
c
B(y/2, -x/2, 0),
B/2
)
2
_Ji2' j +
A
+
_ey2-
_2B 2
we
e. hB
2
4C2
and I-, is the
obtain
c
z
(10.8)
component of the angular
mo-
mentum.
To express the Hamiltonian in terms of dimensionless introduce
vaxiables,
-we
C10.1 Two-dimensional electron motion in
WC2
e,B W,
W
=
=
M
+ W02
and
a
magnetic field
205
.
hI p
=
(10.9)
W U)
magnetic length. (Note using Bohr and hartree 2R*.) Then the Hamiltonian is expressed by the
Here wc is the cyclotron frequency and p is the that the magnetic length is expressed by p =
radius a*
- -2R*-1hwa*
dimensionless variable ri: H
=
1
hw
2
+XE 1ri
-
j>i
Here the is
hwc
=
length is
A,
+
2
hw,
E lj ,
-
2
e2 X
=
2R*a*
aj ,
(10.10)
-
P
rIP
in unit of the
g*AB B
i
with
rjI
(2ra,/m*)ABB.
1
lr,2 2
magnetic length. The cyclotron energy
The ratio of m,/rn* is of order 15 for the 2D
electron system in GaAs-Ga,,All-,,As heterojunctions. The strength of the Coulomb potential is of the order of X, while the level spacing of the single-particle energy is determined by hw. Therefore the ratio
Xlhw
-
VI'2--R*-Ihw is
the
quantity which
charac-
terizes the electronic motion. If the ratio is much smaller than
the
independent
tion. As it
the
motion of the electrons becomes
a
unity, good approxima-
increases, the correlated motion of the electrons overwhelms
independent
motion.
Recall that the second and third terms of the above Hamiltonian are
consistent with the well-known fact that
mass
M and
charge
qe in the
magnetic
a
spin 1/2 particle with magnetic
ffied B has the
interaction energy -IPB, where the magnetic moment tL of the particle is in general expressed by tL g1l + gs in units of ehl(2Mc). Here g, and g, are the respective gyromagnetic ratios for the orbital and =
spin angular momenta. The gi value is equal to q, while the Dirac 2q for a point charged paxticle like the equation would give g, 2.0023 ILB for the The measurement electron. gives I g, I precision electron and the deviation from 2 can be very accurately computed by the higher order corrections of quantum electrodynamics. On the other hand, the experimental values for the nucleons are far from the 5.586 for the proton Dirac value expected for point paxticles: g, =
=
=
and g, AN
=
=
-3.826 for the neutron in units of the nuclear
eh/(2mpc).
nucleon.
magneton
This fact is ascribed to the internal structure of the
Complements
206
The eigenvalue of the single-particle Hamiltonian, Ho hw (-,A/2 +r2 /2) -(hw,12)1., -(g*p.BB12)o-,,, is obtained easily. Rewriting the spatial coordinate as a complex variable z (x iy)/-\/-2, we defme =
-
I
at
72= (
=
Z
0),
* -
OZ
a=
(z
b
(z*
'0
I
--.,f2- (z- OZ* ),
bt=
=
[at, b]
Hamiltonian
Ho
=
=
[at, bt]
=
0. We
can
OZ* 0
+
[a, at]
with the commutation relations
[a, bt]
+
OZ
[b, bt]
=
=
[a, b]
1 and
then express the
single-particle
as
hw(ata + btb + 1)
Ihw,(ata
-
-
2
btb)
Ig*ttBBc-z-
-
2
(10.12)
The operator at creates a right circular quantum of counterclockwise rotation about z axis, and bt creates a left one. Let a non-negative
eigenvalue of the total oscillator quanta ata+btb at a b b. and m denote an eigenvalue of the angular momentum 1,, Then the eigenvalues of A and btb are given by (N + m)/2 and (N m)/2, respectively. Since they should be positive integers or zero, the possible values of m for a given N are m -N+ N, N-2, N-4, 2, -N. The single-particle energy becomes integer N denote
an
=
-
-
=
...,
E,,,,,,
=
=
with Sz
quanta
hw(N+1)
2
hw(2n + Iml
being
either
N is set
hwm
+
1/2
For
of
hw(N + 1),
1) or
to N
equal given N, possible
n.
a
I -
-
I -
2
g*ABBS,
hwm
-1/2, =
2n +
values of
-
(10.13)
g*ABB$,
and where the number of total
Iml
with
n are
0,
1
a
non-negative integer [N12]. The energies
....
with N + I-fold
degeneracy, corresponding to the 2D are independent of m conforming to N. The singleparticle energy is shown in Fig. 10.9. In the case of no magnetic field or very weak magnetic field (w,lwo < 1) the single-particle level shows a shell structure with degeneracy of N + 1. The single-particle level is then in the order of haxmonic-oscillator
(n, m)
=
(0, 0); (0, 1), (0, -1); (0, 2), (1, 0), (0, -2);...
The level
cross-
V/-I/-2
ing of the low-lying single-particle levels occurs at W,/WO 0.71 and the level with (n, m) (0, 2) becomes lower than the =
=
with
(0, -1).
Z-'
one
CIO. 1 Two-dimensional electron motion in
a
magnetic field
207
If wo 0, that is, there is no confining potential present or the magnetic field is very high (wc.Iwo > 1), w is (nearly) equal to (112)w, and the energy becomes E,,,,, hw,(n+(Iml -m)/2+1/2) -9*ABBS,, de=
=
(Iml
pending only
on n +
dent of m for
positive
-
m.
m) /2. Clearly the energy becomes indepen-
This
gives
rise to
infinitely degenerate levels
called the Landau levels with the Landau level index The fact that the
levels with
an
single-electron degeneracy
infinite
motion is
quantized
number in the
+
n
case
(IM I
-
m) /2.
to the Landau
of
no
confining
potential reflects the fact that the energy is independent of the center of the cyclotron motion. In the presence of the confining potential, the
single-particle energy increases with m as seen from Fig. 10.9. By using the polar coordinates r and 6 the eigenfimetions single-particle Hamiltonian are expressed as
rp2
ni n!
(n-t TP 2(n+lml)!
(r)
1-1
L (I ' 1) n
P
r2
(p2
-
r
ey-P
of the
2
2p2
(10.14) where
Ln(c) (x)
is
an
associated
Laguerre polynomial defined by
d L,(,o I (X) =ex-' (e-XX n+a n! dXn n
E k! (n
'k=O
F(n+a+l) (-X),. k)! -V(k + a + 1)
(10.15)
-
parity operation changes V to V + 7, so the parity of the singleparticle eigenfunction is given by (-l)'. For the lowest Landau states (n 0, m > 0) the larger angular momentum state corresponds to a wave function which is more extended from the origin:
The
=
2
(0o,jr loom
(Iral
The Han-d1tonian
+
1)P2.
(10.10)
(10.16)
contains the Coulomb interaction be-
electrons, which leads to interesting effects on quantum interplay between the magnetic field and the Coulomb interaction is an essential ingredient for studying the dots. The relative importance of various pieces of the Hamiltonian depends on m*, K, g*,
tween the
dots. The
and B. For two electrons the Hamiltonian
can
be
separated in the relative By introducing
and center-of-mass coordinates of the two electrons. the coordinates
7 C)
Is 6
5
4
3
2
1
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
O)C /0)0
Fig. 10.9. The single-particle energy E,,,,, of a quantum dot as a function of magnetic field strength. The Zeeman spin splitting of the energy is not included.
C10.1 Two-dimensional electron motion in
R=
I
-\f2-
('rl +r2),
Ir
a
magnetic field
I-(Irl -r2),
=
209
(10.17)
A/2
the Hamiltonian is reduced to H
=
hwf
I -
2
,AR
+
1R21
'&V,, IR ,
-
"A'r + 21,r2 2
+ hW
2
-
C
.
2
2
hWcl
,T Z
+
g*[tBB(Sj,,
+
S2 ,)
X 1
(10.18)
-
vF2 r
by exactly the same Hamiltonian as the single-particle Hamiltonian and its energy and eigenfunction are given by Eqs. (10.13) and (10.14). The eigenfunction b(T) of the relative motion Hamiltonian may be obtained in polar coordinates. By separating the angular part as b(r) u(r)e " (m and the the function radial eigenvalue E, are obu(r) 0, 1, 2, ...), tained from the following equation The center-of-mass motion is determined
=
d2u
1 du +
-
.-
r
where
u(r)
dr
has to
r2
+
satisfy
V2-X 1 hW
M2 +
=
2Er
W, 7n
U
-
r
the condition that its norm,
=
0,
(10.19)
fo' drru(r)2, is
finite.
analytical solutions are available provided Xlhw belongs to a certain enumarably infinite set of values [1411. For a general case we can obtain the eigenvalue by numerical integrations. The eigenvalue 0, 1, 2,... for each m. We may be labelled by a quantum number n note the symmetry property of the eigenfunctions. The interchange of the position coordinates ri and V2 leads to r -r, which is # + 7r. Therefore the eigenfunction equivalent to the change of 6 and receives labelled by n a phase change e"' m (-I)m, so that it is symmetric for even m and antisymmetric, for odd m. Figure 10.10 displays the energy E, of the relative motion as a function of the cyclotron frequency. The most striking feature is the level crossing in the lowest level (ground state). With increasing magnetic field the so (0, 0) to (0, 1), (0, 2), (0, 3), ground state changes from (n, m) that the angular momentum m of the ground state increases one by one. (This figure is basically the same as Fig. 10.4 which is obtained by the variational calculation, but included here to show the significant Paxticular
=
---).
--*
=
=
role of the Coulomb
Finally
we
electrons in
a
..
-,
interaction.)
importance of the correlated motion of strong magnetic field has already been recognized in
note that the
the quantum Hall effect
[1421.
The
broadening of the Landau levels
Complements
210
12-
11
10I f I I
9-
8 It
7
*11
IA 41/
3-
*,
-
2
1
0
-
1
0
1
2
3
5
4 0)
Fig. dot
C
6
7
8
9
10
/ (00
10.10. The energy E, of the relative motion of a two-electron quantum function of magnetic field strength. The Zeeman spin splitting of
as a
the energy is not included. The solid curves are for states with even m and the dashed curves for states with odd m. hwo = 1. Atomic units are used.
CIOA Two-dimensional electron motion in is caused
by
scatterers such
as
a
magnetic field
211
impurities and lattice defects. The repulsion between many electrons
correlations due to the Coulomb
lead to the Anderson localization and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Laughlin [1431 successfully used a correlated basis of Jastrow
type
to describe the electron motion.
11. Nuclear
few-body systems
originally developed to solve physics. In this chapter we collect a
The stochastic variational method
was
few-body problems in nuclear few possible applications of the SVM for nuclear systems. The nuclear force, due to the effect of the underlying quark structure and relativistic motion, is a very complicated interaction. h addition to the spinisospin dependent central part, the two-nucleon interaction contains spin-orbit and tensor forces, and L2- and (LS)2_dependent terms. The two-body interaction designed to fit the nucleon-nucleon phase shift and the properties of the deuteron fails to reproduce the binding energies of the three- and four-nucleon nuclei, and a three-body interaction has to be introduced to get the correct binding energy. As the nucleons are not structureless point-like entities, the spatial part of the nuclear force contains a strong repulsion at short distances. These circumstances altogether make the solution of the nuclear few-body problem a
formidable task.
application is restricted to central forces. These schematic forces are used in simple model calculations and serve for benchmark tests. Examples of more realistic problems are shown J-n the last secThe first
tion.
Introductory remark
11.1
on
nucleon-nucleon
potentials The nucleon
(N)
has
spin and isospin degrees of freedom
in addition
of Eq. (2.3) is a product of these spatial one. The operator 0?. V factors, one acting on each coordinate of the three types:
to the
0?. 73
=
(0,,ij (space) 0,.ij (spin) -
Oij (isospin),
Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 213 - 246, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
214
11. Nuclear
where,
e.g.,
few-body systems
0,,,,j (space) (IL
=
n,
r.
-
-K)
1,
is
a
spherical tensor a scalar product
spatial part, and product (-I)"A/2__K+ I[T,,, x U,,Ioo, which (T,,,.U,,) is defined with Clebsch-Gordan coefficients by operator of rank
acting
K
in the
stands for the tensor
[Tr-1
X
Ur-2]r-393
=
E
(11.2)
rv1jL1K2A2jK3A3 >TK,jL1 Ur-2/L2'
0, E(I, ab)
=
2 2 2) -g (a 2 xj+b X2,
(- 1)
1
(11.32)
for ab < 0. Since the
Legendre polynomial PI(cosO) is proportional to the tensor product [YI(i-1) x Yj(i2-)joo (see Eq. (6.54)) and has non-vanishing matrix elements between the functions of different partial waves, we find that the various multipole components contained in the potential bring about the mixing of the higher partial waves. The relative strength of the multipoles thus determines the extent to which each partial wave is contained in the solution. For a long-ranged potential (small p) the magnitude Of V1 (X1 X2) is determined by the factor IL21/ (21 1) 11, the soluto contributions main low that so partial waves give only tion. However, this is not the case for a short-ranged potential. The -
7
shorter the potential range is, the larger the contribution of thehigher inultipole components. E.g., in the extreme case of V(I ax, + bX2 1) -
Quark
C11.3
Pauli effect in s-shell A
hypernuclei
239
(fk2/7)3/2 and letting 1L oc in Eq. J(ax, + bX2), by putting Vo (11.32) We get VI(X1, X2) ((21+ 1)/(47))J(Ialxl jbjX2)1(jabjXIX2), ,
=
-
which indicates that the
-
multipole strength is equally strong for arbi-
trary 1. The result of Table 11.10 the fact that the ATS3
repulsive-core part. Clearly the matrix
be understood in this way from contains the strong short-ranged
can
potential
potential
element for the central
between the
neutron and the proton vanishes for the functions of diffrent I values if they are expressed in terms of the different Jacobi coordinate set where
the first coordinate is chosen to the relative coordinate between the neutron and the proton. This consideration leads us to the following ansatz for the solution
(X(I), X(1)) [Y,(X(,)) YJ(X(1)) 100
f
1
1
2
X
2
1
+
X
fl(3) (X (3), (3)) [yJ(X(3))
X
1
+
where
fl(2) (X (2), (2)) [yJ(X(2)) 1
x('), x(') (i 1
2
=
X
X
1
2
1
2
1
1
y1I
(X(2))j 2
Yj(X 2(3))
00
100
(11-33)
1, 2, 3) stands for the ith Jacobi set (see Sect. 2.4).
This type of functions is used in the Faddeev method and the CRCG [26] method. It is known that this expansion converges much faster than the one using one particular Jacobi set, and the inclusion of low
partial waves
is
be sufficient to get accurate solutions (see In contrast to this approach, the CG basis
expected to
also Sect. 4.2.1 and
[30]).
particular Jacobi coordinate but takes account of the contribution of the high partial waves by the cross term 1412XVX2 in the exponent of the trial function. This ensures accurate solutions in the correlated Gaussian approach. It is noted that the calculation of matrix elements with high I values is computer time consuming (see Appendix A-5), whereas in the CG basis no such PWE is employed, which makes it possible to calculate matrix elements very quickly. of
Eq. (11.26)
uses
only
one
Quark Pauli effect in s-shell A hypernuclei 4 3 and 5A Ije are Called Among a few known A hypernuclei AH, 4jA 1, AIIe, s-shell hypernuclei because in the simplest version of the shell model 0 all the constituents can reside in an s orbit. By applying the L 11-3
-
=
Complements
240
correlated Gaussians of
Eq. (7.3),
of s-shell A
in order to reveal the
hypernuclei quark substructure of baryons of
in
we
calculate the
resolving
the
binding energies significant role of the long-standing problem
'He.
pioneering work of [1711, the S-shell A hypernuclei have intriguing problems, among others, the anomalously small binding of 5AHe. According to a recent survey of hypernu5 clear physics [1721, "The anomalously small binding of AHe remains an enigma. Simple model calculations based upon AN potentials, parametrized to account for the low-energy AN scattering data and the binding energy of the A 3, 4 A-hypernuclei, overbindS A5He by Since the
offered several
=
2-3 MeV."
The trial function is
given as
a
combination of the correlated Gaus-
sians:
CkAjFAk (X)XkJM?7kTMTli
TfJMTMT
(11.34)
k
where the operator A
antisymmetrizes the nucleon coordinates, XkjjU (Since L 0, the spin S is equal to the total angular momentum J), and 77kTMT is the isospin function. The spin and isospin functions are obtained by successive couplings, for examPle, XkJM= X(S12SI23 )JM [[[Xl/2 X XI/21SI2 X X1/2JSI23-IJTM with k representing a set of the intermediate spins S12, S1237 The optimal set was chosen for each matrix Ak. The matrix Ak containing is the
spin function
=
:::--:
...
....
nonlinear parameters
was
selected
by
the SVM.
The NEnnesota potential [1471 with u I was used for the NN interaction. The MA potential is the same as was used in the previous Complement. Table 11.11 lists the results of the calculation. The calculation reproduces the data well except for the case Of AHe, for which the theory overestimates the binding energy by about 1.9 MeV, =
consistent with what is mentioned above. Another is that
4 He A
is
4 H. A
thing to be noticed
strongly introducing a charge-dependent component as the IVA interaction, because then 4AHe would be less tightly bound because of the Coulomb repulsion. We have so far treated a baryon as a structureless particle and distinguished A from N. What happens if we take their quaxk substructure into consideration? Recently it has been shown in [173] that the anomalous binding problem of 5A He can be, at least partly, resolved more
bound than
It would be difficult to
understand this without
by considering
the
quark substructure
of the
baryons.
C11.3
Quark Pauli effect
in s-shell A
hypernuclei
241
Binding energies (in units of MeV) of s-shell hypernuclei. The separation energy BA of the hypernucleus AAX is defined by the difference of the binding energies, B(-A'1X)-B(-'1-1X). Table 11.1-1.
A
3
AH
A411
4AHe
5 He A
B(AX) A B(`1-1X)
2.38
10.62
9.91
34.93
2.20
8.38
7.71
29.95
BA(Cal.) BA(Exp.)
0.18
2.23
2.20
4.98
0.130.05
2.040.04
2.390.03
3.120.02
Let
us assume
for the sake of simplicity that
baryon is (u, d, d), A a
a
coinpos-
(u, d, s), (u, u, d), n particle of three quarks, p well. harmonic-oscUlator the in orbit in the Os and each quark moves with size parameter b. The spatial part of the three-quark baxyon is described by the function ite
=
=
OB
-`
(7rb2)
exp
b2
Z3
( '3
2b2
1
+
2
+
3
3
exp
-
where pi is the
(_ (P2 P2 P2)) (_ _b 2) O(int) 1
-1 4
=
2rI
(11.35)
B
quark's position vector,
rl
=
(P1
+ P2 +
P30
is the
is the spatial part of the intrinsic baryon's position vector, and 0(int) B wave function of the baryon depending on p, P3* P27 (PI + P2)/2 The value of b can be estimated to be about 0.86 fin by requiring that the function (11.35) reproduce the charge radius of the proton [1741. When the spatial part of the two-baryon wave function is described we interpret it as with the configuration of expf -3/(2b2)(r21 + r2)1, 2 the Os in all six orbit, exp(-p 2/(2b 2)), quarks move indicating that of the common harmonic-oscillator well. with size parameter b. By increasing the number of baryons, we thus expect that the manybaxyon wave function may receive a special constraint arising from the quark Pauli principle that any single-particle orbit can accommodate at most six quarks (three colors and up-down spins) for each flavor. It is easy to see that we have no apparent quark Pauli-forbidden 4 hypernuclei. However, this is not the case for states up to A 5 5He: Four nucleons of A He, when they are on top of one another, A have already six u-quarks and six d-quarks in the Os orbit, so neither u nor d quark of A can take the same Os orbit. This leads us to the conclusion that the five baryons cannot take a configuration of -
=
-
Complements
242
exp(-3/(2b 2) 1:5i=1_ r i2) forbidden state for
rated,
.
To be
5AHe,
more
specific, the (normalized) Paulibeing sepa-
with its center-of-mass motion
given by
is
TfPF (X)
=
JV
'(7b2)-3eXP(_ 4
-
3
5
3
_b2 Dr'
X5)2
(11.36)
i=1
where X5 is the center-of-mass coordinate of the five baryons. The normalization constant is given by JV (4M2 + M2)/(4MN + MA)2' =
A
N
where MN is the mass of N. Other Pauli-forbidden states sibly exist, but this is the simplest and most evident one. The solution TI obtained above for 5He A
Pauli-forbidden component of Eq. quence is very
was
might
pos-
found to contain the
(11.36) by only 0.44:'YD, but its conse-
If this Pauli-forbidden component is simply subtracted from the wave function Tf, the BA value would have been
changed of
A5He!
from 4.98 MeV to 2.74 The reduction is
pectation may be
significant:
a
principle
MeV,
anomalously
small
binding
due to the fact that the energy exvalue in TfF(x) is very large, i.e., 513.6 MeV. However, this premature conclusion from the viewpoint of the variational
because the reduction in the
calculation of the so-called variation
6.1),
no
mainly
binding energy is based on a before projection type (see Sect.
that
is, the variation has been done before the elimination of the Pauli-forbidden component is made from the trial function. To calculate the
binding energy more precisely by taldng into acquark effect, we have repeated the calculation by replacing the correlated Gaussian in Eq. (11.34) with the one that 'has count the
no
Pauli
Pauli-forbidden component:
FAk (X)
11.4 The
FAA: (X)
C nucleus
-
TfPF (X) (TfPF (X) IFAI, (X))
-
(11.37)
system of three alpha-particles example application of nonlocal potentials, we take up simple model for the 12 C nucleus, the 3a model. In this model 12C
As a
12
=
an
of the
as a
C11.4 The
12C
nucleus
as a
system of three alpha-particles
243
5
>4
Pq
3
Exp.
2
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
b
Fig.
[fml
separation energy BA of 5H A three-quark baryons
11.4. The A
parameter b of
containing
1.2
1.0
0.8
six protons and six neutrons is
as
a
function of the size
approximatedas
bosonic
a
system of three alpha-particles. The physical reason behind this picture is in the fact that the alpha-particle is a strongly bound, very stable system compared to light neighboring nuclei. One needs an energy of about 20 MeV to excite the of the
alpha-particle.
Because of this
nuclei tend to form
unique
feature, light subsystem ing of two protons and two neutrons, which is called an alpha-cluster. The alpha-cluster would never be identical to the alpha-particle but it may happen that a model descriptioii assun-Ang such subsystems can explain many properties of the light nuclei [60, 175, 59]. To calculate the binding energy of 12C in the 3a model, one needs to know the potential between two alpha-paxticles. It is hard to derive a potential which acts between composite particles through the underlying interactions of the particles composing the composite particles. Thus we use a phenomenological potential which successfully reproduces the alpha-alpha scattering phase shifts. The one employed here is an I-independent local potential consisting of both the nuclear some
paxt of Gaussian form and the Coulomb part
V(r)
=
-Vo
e
_P,
4e2
2
+ r
erf (,3r),
a
consist-
[1761: (11-38)
Complements
244
where VO
122.6225
=
MeV, p 0.22:ftn-2, and scattering data very well
0.75 fin-'.
=
fits the
this
Though
to about
30 Em potential MeV and reproduces the 0+ resonance at 92 keV quite well, we have to note that it predicts "redundant bound states", two (-72.625 and
MeV)
-25.617
I
=
2
in the I
state, these bound states ftom the
0
=
wave
and
one
(-21.999 MeV)
are
known to form
bound
no
axe
space. The existence of
configuration
in the
alpha-paxticles considered spurious and must be excluded
Since the two
wave.
=
system of two nuclei is due understood in the
to the Pauli
spurious
principle
and
states for
can
be
a
easily
version of the nuclear shell model. This is
simplest orthogonality condition model [1771 which succeeded to give a foundation to the deep local potential of type (11.38) from the microscopic theory of scattering between composite particles. Let us denote the spurious states as 0, 1 for I (r), (n I 0 for 0, and n 2). We require that the wave function TI, for the 3a system be free from the spurious components in the alpha-alpha pairs, that is, the basis of the
=
=
=
( Pnim(ri
-
rAff)
=
(11.39)
0-
Here ri is the position vector of ith alpha-particle. Unless this condition is imposed, the ground-state energy with the potential (11.38)
strongly overbound because
would be
the
alpha-clusters,
as
bosons,
would occupy the lowest possible states. An alternative, convenient approach to eliminate reasonably well the spurious components is to use
the nonlocal
Fini
1M
==
potential of projection operator type
I
(ri
rj)) (W,,,M (ri
-
and include it in the Hamilto-nian
-
as a
kind of
N
I
=
T
-
Vij(lri-rjl)+A
Here A is
a
wave
positive
E EI'i'!
(11.41)
j>i=l n1m
j>i=l
that if the
"pseudo potential" [178] N
E
Tn, +
(11.40)
rj) 1,
constant chosen to be very
large. The idea
is
function contains the spurious components, then the energy would be comparatively high. Therefore, the variational lowest solution would approach a state that has a negligible overlap with the
spurious components. The spurious bound
state
lar
O,am (r)
Cae- 2 a
2
can
be well
Y1. (r)
approximated
in the form
(11.42)
CIIA The
12
Then the nonlocal
C nucleus
potential
as a
system of three alpha-particles
summed
over m
245
takes the form
_Vnlra
f
ij
M
21+1
(rr') -47r where V is the
R
(cosv) E ca*ca, e-la 2
r2_ 1 af rf2
(11.43)
aa,
between
angle
r
and
r.
The trial function for the
system was chosen as a linear combination of the correlated Gaussians, FA(x), of Sect. 7.2. The matrix element of the nonlocal potential (11.43) in this basis can be calculated with the use of Eq. (7.46). 3a
high sensitivity of the energy on A calls for numerical calculations with a high accuracy in order for the pseudo potential to play the role of the Pauli projector. It was found [1791 that the pro0 and 2 do not jection effect is so strong that the partial waves 1 The
=
contain bound states, and a contribution of more than 95 % to the ground-state energy is due to the partial wave I 4. Table 11.12 lists =
the
energies
of the
ground
state and the excited states obtained in
a
[1801 using the basis function of Eq. (11.33). h (X1 X2) is expanded as combinations of Gaussians 2 The calculation does not reproduce the experix11 x12 exp(-ax 1 _OX2) 2 mental energies very well. In [1801 the energies of the 2+1 and 41+ states
variational calculation The radial part
are
also
given. They
are
-3.77 and -2.25
MeV, respectively, which
compared to the experimental energies of -2.84 and 6.80 MeV. Here the discrepancy between theory and experiment is more serious: state is lower than that of the 0+1 state and the The energy of the 2+ , energy of the 4+1 state is much lower than the experimental energy. are
Note that there is
no
Pauli-forbidden state in the 1
makes the contribution of the
high partial
> 4 waves,
waves too much
which
important.
This calculation suggests that the 3a model with the local aa potential has only limited success and is not very realistic to reproduce the experimental energy spectra. This doe not, however, exclude the
Table 11.12. Energies of the 0+ states of 12C calculated in the 3a model [180]. The energy is measured from the threshold of the 3a breakup.
0+ 2
0+ 3
-3.38
-1.43
3.70
-7.27
0.38
3.03
0+ 1
(MeV) Exp. (MeV) Cal.
Complements
246
a
+
8Be,
a (
and
'Be(a,-y)12c.
Appendix
Matrix elements for
Gaussians
general
The matrix element for the correlated Gaussian with
arbitrary physically important potentials including central, tensor and spin-orbit components. A simple and straightforward method is presented to calculate the matrix element for the general correlated Gaussian-type geminals.
angular
momentum is obtained in
a
closed form for most
A.1 Correlated Gaussians We start with
Eq. (7.2)
to evaluate the matrix element for
a general generating functions g is given perform the operations prescribed in Eq.
The matrix element between the
case.
in Table 7.1 and
one
has to
(7.2). A.1.1
The
Overlap
overlap
of the basis functions
matrix element
can
be obtained
through
(fK" LM (u, A", X) 1 fKLM (u, A, x)) I
BKLBK-’L
ff
d9de’YLm(i;_)YLm(e’)
_
d2K+L+2K+L
dA2K+LdAI2K’+L
3
X
detB
exp
[q A2 + q"A/2 + PAA/e. er]
where Y. Suzuki and K. Varga: LNPm 54, pp. 247 - 298, 1998 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998
\,=0
,
(A. 1)
Appendix
248
B=A+A',
q=
2
fiB-lu,
q
B-lu ,
2
p
=; B-lu.
(A.2) To
perform
the
operation prescribed
Eq. (A.1),
in
we use
the
ex-
pansion
[qA2 + q, A/2 + pAA/ e. el]
exp
CO
00
CO
E 1: E H(n, q).ff(i , q) H(m, P) Vn+m y2n+m
fn
n=O n'=O m=O
(A-3) where
H(n, x)
is introduced to
10
Xn
H(n, x)
for
n!
simplify the
notation and defined
non-negative integer
n
by
(A.4)
otherwise.
Differentiating with respect to A and Y, followed by A 0, 2K + L and gives non-vanishing contribution only when 2n + m 2K' + L, while the integration over the angles of e and e' 2n + m becomes nonzero if m is equal to L + 2k with non-negative integer k (see Eq. (6.18)): =
=
if
d iYLM(e-)yLM(,
di
1
j)*(e.eI)2k+L
K k and n Rewriting n overlap matrix element =
-
=
K'
-
k,
=
we
BI.-L
(A.5)
obtain the result for the
(fKIILM(UI, A', X) IfKLM(u, A, x)) (2K+L)!(2K'+L)i
(27)N-1-
BKLBKIL
detB
3 2
min(K,K') X
E
H(K-k,q)H(K-k,q)H(L+2k,p)BkL- (A.6)
k=O
The B,,I value is given in Eq. (6.9). Note that the values of K and K' usually be chosen to be small. in practical cases, and then the sum
can
over
of K
k is limited to =
K'
=
just
a
few terms. In
0 the above result
particular, simplifies to
for the
special
case
A. 1 Correlated Gaussians
249
(ALM(Uli A i X) IfOLM(Ui A X)) 3
(2v) N_I
(
(2L + 1)!! 4v
detB
2
)
P
L
(A.7)
A.1.2 Kinetic energy
The kinetic energy with the center-of-mass kinetic energy subtracted is given in Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11). It is simply written as FrAn-/2. The matrix element of the kinetic energy is then
Table 7.1
easily obtained by using
as
I
(fK"LM(UIjXjX)j ?rA7rjfKLM(UjAjX))
X
h2
(2r) N-I
2BKLBKIL
detB
(
d2K+L+2K+L
[R
dA2K+LdA/2K'+L
X
exp
3 2
+
if
de-- do
pA2
+
YLm (&) YLM (4 )
p/A/2
+
QAA'e-.e-f
[qA2 + q' A/2 + PAAte.e/
(A.8)
where R
M(AB-'A!A),
=
P'=
P
=
-i B-'AAAB-lu ,
-i!B-1A!AA!B-'u, Q
=
2
The matrix element of the kinetic energy manipulation similar to the overlap case: I
(2r)N-1
h2(2K+L)!(2K+L)!
x
be obtained
k, q)H(K'
-
3
2
detB
BKLBK"L
E f RH(K
can
rA7rjfKLM(u, A, x))
(fKfLM(Uf7A!jX)j 2
2
B-'AAXB-lu.
-
k, q)H(L + 2k, p)
k
+PH(K
-
k
-
1, q)H(K'
-
k, q')H(L + 2k, p)
(A.9) by using
a
Appendix
250
+P'H(K
k, q)H(K'
-
-
k
-
1, q)H(L -IF 2k, p)
+QH(K-k,q)H(K'-k,q')H(L+2k-l,p)lBkLThe
case
K'
with K
=
0 reduces to
a
(A.10)
simple result
very
(ALM(U17A x) I --iAw I fOLM (u, A, x)) 2 ,
h? 2
A.1.3 Next
detB
4-x
)
3 2
P
L
(A.11)
Two-body interactions
we
(11.1). a
(2,x)'V-1
(2L + 1)!! (R+LQp- )-
derive the matrix element for the interaction of Eqs.
(2.3)
and
To evaluate the matrix element of the operator expressed as product, it is convenient to make use of the famous Wigner-
tensor
[70, 71, 721, which states that a matrix element of a operator 0.-, between states with angular momenta
Eckart theorem
spherical
tensor
JM and XIW
coefficient and
be
can a
expressed
as
product of
a
reduced matrix element which is
z-components of the
(J'M'JO-AIJM)
angular =
a
Clebsch-Gordan
independent of the
momenta:
(JMrILJYM-) ,V2J'
+ I
Here the reduced matrix element is barred matrix element. The factor
V 110. 11 J).
(A.12)
expressed by the so-called double-
I/V -2-Y+I is factored out because
then the reduced matrix element is
symmetric
to the bra and ket
interchange
IEV 110. 11 X) provided of
OKIL
is
=
(-I)J+r.-J,(y 110. 11 J),
(A-13)
that the matrix element is real and the Hermitian
(0'1') t
=
E(- 1) "L Or,, -i-L
with
a
phase
factor
E(E2
conjugate =
1).
By applying the Wigner-Eckart theorem we can express the matrix element for the orbital and spin angular momentum coupled wave function
as
follows:
(Tf(LI SI) JM IV(I'ri
-rj 1)
(Or ij (space) 0,,ij (spin)) ITf(LS) JM)
U(LnJS; L'S) V,f(2L' + 1) (2S + 1)
-
A.1 Correlated Gaussians
(L' 11 V(Iri
x
rj J)0,,jj (space)
-
251
11 L) (S' 11 0,,jj (spin) 11 S). (A.14)
potential V(r) is assumed to be a function of r only. Eq. (A.14) and its extension to a general coupled tensor operator is given in Exercise A.I. The reduced matrix element of the spatial part is obtained through Here the form factor of the
The derivation of
(LMn1ijL'M') (L' II V(I ri v/2--L'+I (L'IWIV(Iri
=
jV(r)(LM'jJ(rj case
uncoupled by
where
wave
-rj
(_1)r. 2S'
one uses
-
I I L)
-
r)O,,,,,j (space) ILM)dr.
the orbital and spin matrix element
(A.15)
angular momentum
(A.14)
can
be obtained
(0,,,j (space) 0,j (spin)) lTf(LS)JM)
ri 1)
-
U(LKJS'; LIS)
+ I
2S+1
x
-rj
function, the
R(L"S")JM IV(Iri
rj 1) 0,,i, (space)
(space) ILM)
=
In the
-
(LMLts1-tjLIML')(SMSrvjS,MS)
(TfL,MLS,ms, IV(Iri -rj J)0,st,,j (space)Oc,jj (spin jTfLmLsms) (A.16)
Since the spin matrix element is easily calculated as will be shown in Appendix AA, we will focus on the spatial matrix element and evaluate it for the most important components of the nuclear potential, that is, central, tensor and spin-orbit components.
(i) central
and tensor interactions
The operator
Or-A,j (space)
can
be I for the central
potential
and
Y2,,(r-i---r-j)
for the tensor operator. See Eq. (11.7). Thus both the central and tensor components can be treated by assuming the form
---rj) for 0,,,,,3. (space). Expressing ri
of Y,,,,, (,r-i
(N 7.1,
-
1)
we
x
1 column matrix
-
rj
as w (ij) x
Oj) defined iii Eq. (2.13)
and
with the
using Table
obtain
(fK'L'M'(UI74 x)IS(ri
-
rj
-
r)Y,,j,(rj
-
rj) IfKLM(U7 -47 X))
Appendix
252
'::::-
6)(fKLM(UIi W 7x)IJ(W(ij)X-r)jfKLM(u,A,x))
Yrg(
(27r)N-2C
1
2
1
e-fc7'Y-"(i )BKLBKL' X
if
de^- d,
detB
)
3 2
d 2K+L+2K'+L'
iYjLM(e,-) YJL, M,
dA2K+LdAI2K'+L'
XeXp[q,X2+ A/2+ Aye.e/+7Ae.,r+,Y/,XIe/.,r] (A-17) where C
w(ij)B-lw (ij) I
q=q-
2c
^/2
c
q'-
2c
w(ij) B-1u,
712
cw(ij)B-1U',
7
=P-
1'7YI.
(A.18)
C
All of these quantities
depend on i and j but we omit the labels i and j to simplify notations. The integration over the angles of e and e' can be performed by expanding exp (pAVe- e' + -/Ae- r + -l'.Ve,- r) in -
power series and
-
using the relation
(e.e )nj(e.T)n2(eI.,r)n3 n2 +n3
Lel=l
njn2n3
RL Lfn
[[YjL( )
X
Y
X
Y. 00
LL'r.
(A.19)
with Rnjn2n3 2 LIts
=
(_I)nl+n2+n3
Bnl-LI7 Bn2-12 12 Bn,3 -13 2
'1
2
2
3
111213
VE(2L+:1:1 )
(2 r. + 1)
212+1
C(1112; L)C(1113; L)C(1213; K)
U(IIIILK; L'12).
(A.20)
See Exercise A.2 for the derivation of this relation. In the
defining
I or 0, and 12 equation for R the sum over 11 is limited to ni, ni 2, and 13 have similar ranges, respectively. Possible values of L, L", and r, -
...'
A.1 Correlated Gaussians
for
a
given set of values of ni, n2, and
n3
limited
axe
253
by the conditions
that L takes the values nj +n2, nj +n2 2, ..., I or 0, and L' and r, take similar values given by ni, n3 and n2, n3, respectively. In addition, the -
is restricted to
sum over
L, L,
for
values of
given
and n2 + n3
-
K
r.
even
values of L + L+ K. -
-
LL'r.
R has the symmetry: The reduced matrix element becomes
would vanish.
Conversely,
L, L', and K, all of the nj + n2 L, nj + n3 L, have to be non-negative and even, otherwise Rnin2n3
Clearly
(fK'L'(UIi -4 i X) 11 V(17'i
ri Dyt#
-
njn2n3
RLLII,,
pnjn3n2 "L'Ln
i -rj) 11 fKL (u, A, x)) 'R
Lf
(2K + L)! (2K'
+
L') 1
BKLBKILI
E
x
(
(27) N-2 detB
C.)2
H(ni, #)H(n2, -y)H(n3, 71) I(n2+n3+2,c)RnL,-n2n3 LIn
n,n2n3
XH
2K + L
-
nj
2K+L'-ni-n3
n2
-
2
2
(A.21) Eq. (7. 10) potential for different pairs of particles be calculated with the above formula by changing only 01) in
where the
I is defined in
integral
The matrix element of the can
Eq. (A. 18). We note
some
useful
applications
of
Eq. (A.21). For example,
calculate the matrix element of I ri-rj I' simply by putting r' and K 0. The two-paxticle correlation function can
one
V(r)
=
(fK-'Ll (u, A', x)
J (I ri
-
rj
a) Y,, (ri
-
rj)
fKL (u, A, x))
(A.22) easily calculated by taking J(r a) for V(r). K' We note again that the formula (A.21) simplifies for K 0, that is, the triple sum reduces to a single sum over, say ni (nl_ 0, min( L, L', (L + L' r,)/2)) and n2 and n3 have to satisfy L and nj + n3 L, respectively. In addition, in this nj + n2 njn2n3 calculated is R case simply by a term with 11 special nj, 12 n3 alone in Eq. (A.20). This simplicity will be used to obtain n2, 13 the matrix element of a density multipole operator. See Complement can
also be
-
=
=
=
-
=
=
=
=
A.2 for the details.
Appendix
254
(ii)spin-orbit The operator
angular
interaction
0,,,,,, (space)
momentum
((ri
rj)
-
1-
x
2h
and
(2.14)
and
trix element in Table 7.1 into
(fK"L"M"(Ufi Al7X)jV(jT'i
substituting
pj))
See
,.
x
and
Eq. (11. 9). -r,
with the
we
the
obt
corresponding
ma-
i
I'jj)1jzjjjfKLM(u, A, x)) (27)N-2
.1 Cr2
drV(r)e-2
-
is the orbital
1,
Eq. (7.2),
-
(pi
in terms of
x
Eqs. (2.13)
of
=
Fij)x W)7r)
Expressing 1,_,,j use
1,1i,
spin-orbit potential
for the
C)
3 2
I
detB
BKLBK'Ll
d2K+L+2K'+L'
dA2K+LdA/2K'+LI q
x
exp
X
ifn*
+
X
qf A/2
r)t,
-
+
PAy e. ef + yXe.,r + -Y/Ale/. -
q'Af (e,
X
(A.23)
r),,
with 77
=
(MXB-lu,
Note that to derive
an
arbitrary
=
Eq. (A.23)
V(r) e-c('-a)2 (r for
q'
vector
x
a
a)dr
(MAB-luf. use
=
(A.24)
is made of the relation
(A.25)
0
provided V(r)
is
a
function of
r.
See
Eq.
(A-163). Before
performing the operation prescribed
that the matrix element vanishes in the has
parity
(_I)L
and because the
case
Eq. (A.23), we note 0 L. Because fKLM
in
of L
spin-orbit potential
does not
change
A. 1 Correlated Gaussians
parity, IL
-
L'I
has to be
even.
On the other
hand,
255
the tensorial char-
spin-orbit potential imposes the condition IL LI :5 1. Both the conditions are met only when L is equal to L'. This special result is entirely due to the unique feature Of fKLM and does not always hold for general wave functions. Combining Eq. (A.19) and the relation acter of the
i
fqX(e
-
r) 0
X
4vf2--x 3
-
77W (e'
rjqA[Yj(ii)
X
x
r)
Yj(i )Jj, -,qA[Yj(( )
x
YI(,P)JI, (A.26)
yields
the reduced matrix element
(fK,ILI (Ul A! X) I I V(I'ri I
I
as
-rj 1) Iij
I I fKL (u, A, x)) '3
4 V2--x 3
x
JLLI (-1)
E
q
L
(2K + L)!(2K' + L)!.
( N-2C.)2 (27r)
detB
BKLBKIL
l(n2+n3+3,c)H(nl,p)H(n2,,y)H(n3,-y')
n,n2n3
2K+L-nl-n2-1
xH
H
2
(2K'+
L
-
nj
-
2
n3,,,)
n., n2 ns
C(AI; L)U(LAII; 1L)RAL1
x
A
I(n2+n3+3,c)H(nj,#)H(n2, -y) H(n3 7f)
+77'
,
njn2n3
H
x
(
2K+L-nl 2
-n2
q)H(
2K+L-nj
njn2n3
C(AI; L)U(LA11; 1L)RLAI
-n3
-
1
2
(A.27)
straightforward and easy to follow. As a simple check of the above formula, the matrix element of the orbital angular momentum is calculated in Exercise A.3. It is again possible, however, to get a simpler formula by performing the'P integration first, as was done in Complement A. 1. This task is reserved for Exercise A.4. The above derivation is
256
Appendix
A.1.4
Density multipole operators
The matrix element of
density multipole operator plays a substantial role in investigating the properties of a system, e.g. the density, the deformation, the electromagnetic transition rates and the electron scattering form factors. The basic element of the Multipole operator a
takes the form
0,,,L, (space)
:---
f (Iri
xm
-
I)YI,
(A.28)
Note that the argument of the
density multipole operator is not ri but is correctly taken as ri xN, which is the single-particle coordinate measured from the center-of-mass coordinate. Comparison of Eqs. (2.12) and (2.13) immediately suggests that the matrix element of the density multipole operator ought to be calculated in exactly the same manner as that of the two-body potential. In fact the reduced -
matrix element
(fK"L-'(U/7 X7 X) 11 f (ITi
-
XNI)yn(Tii
-
N)
fKL (u, A, x))
XN
(A.29) be calculated
can
replacements
of
by Oj)
the --+
same
formula
as
0) inEq. (A.18)
Eq. (A.21) and of
with the trivial
V(r)
--+
f (r)
in
Eq.
(7.10). Just
as
the matrix element for the
lated from that of relation function
As
we
J(ri
can
xN
-
-
r),
and ri
be calcu-
the matrix element for the
also be derived ftom. that of
J(ri
-
rj
-
-
-
reduced to the
are
r)jfKLM(u,A,x)).
in fact obtained in the derivation
one
(fKfL'M" (U , X7 X) IJ(17VX (2K + L)! (2K'
+
BKLBK'L'
-
L)!
following Eq. (A.17),
r) IfKLM(u, A, x))
)N-2C)
(2T,
32
detB
E(LMr.M -MjLM)Y,,m, -m(i )* M
of type
This matrix element
the fi-nal result:
x
r).
-
(fK'L'Mf(U'jA!jx)jJ(iv-x give
cor-
-
already noted in the above derivations, both of ri xN rj are expressible in terms of the relative coordinates x as iv- being an appropriate 1 x (N 1) row matrix. There-
fore all of these matrix elements
we
can
have
Cvx with
was
density operator
L'
-1) -e -v/-2Ll + I
2
so
that
A.2 Correlated Gaussians with different coordinate sets
E
X
257
rn2+n3 Rnin2n3 H(nl, P) H(n2, -y) H(n8, -y') LLIn
nin2n3
X
H
2K+L
-nI -n2
2K' + L'
H
2
-
n,
-
n3
2
(A.30) 7/,
given in exactly the same manner as in Eq. (A.18) with w(W being replaced by w. Here, r, takes the values
where c, 7,
p
are
L+L', L+L'-2,..., IL-L'I,
by IAF-MI :! the special case
and it is of course restricted
The above matrix element becomes very simple for K' 0 as was noticed in the previous subsection. Since the
is.
of K
=
=
applications, we show in Complement A.2 simplified to just a double sum.
matrix element has useful
that
Eq. (A.30)
can
be
A.2 Correlated Gaussians with different coordinate sets As the correlated Gaussians treated in the previous section have a very simple transformation property implied by Eq. (6.29), we as-
they are all expressed by a particular set of the relative coordinates x. However, the correlated Gaussians with the angular function OLM(X) given by Eq. (6.3) do not have such a nice property. Moreover, the use of different sets of the relative coordinates for these correlated Gaussians leads in general to a faster convergence because they allow us the possibility of describing naturally different types of correlations and asymptotics. The lineax transformation of the coordinate sets, however, leads to a formidable task even for a system of only four particles, because the function OLM(X) shows no simple transformation rule. See Appendix A.5 where the matrix elements for a three-body system are explicitly evaluated by transforming the corsumed that
related Gaussians from
one
Jacobi coordinate set to another. The aim
of this section is to outline
are
we
a
method of
calculating
the matrix ele-
the correlated Gaussians which
N-body system using expressed by different sets of the coordinates. By making use of Eq. (6.22) to generate the correlated Gaussian, have to evaluate the following matrix element for the operator 0:
ments for
an
N-1
exp,
2
x-fXx)
11 Yij, j, (x ) j=1
Appendix
258
-1:Z.Ax)
1
0 exp
x
N-1
N-1
Yli.i (xi)
2
Climi,9ai
N
ali-Mi
01i
97i
-
1
01j,i +Mi'
(-')Mj 01j,
3
C11 -mlj aal - ar'1j'+mi' j j j
j=1
(A.31)
(g(a'Jt';A!,x')J0Jg(aJt;A,x))
x
ri=O,-r =O 3
(-1)'YI-,,,(xi) to identity (Yl,,,(xi))* take care of the complex conjugation in the bra side. Note that the vector ti is defined by 2, i(l + i 2), -2-Fi) and likewise t!j by Here
(1
is made of the
use
T,
/2' i(I + T/2), -2,Tj j
=
complex conjugated.
not be
transformation T trix element
x'
as
(A.31)
=
tj'
of g in the bra side should Assume that x' is related to x by a linear
The vector
j
Tx. With the
between two
g's which
different sets of relative coordinates
Eq. (6.28) expressed in
of
use are
the
ma-
terms of
be reduced to
can
(g(a'lt'; X, x')J0Jg(aJt;A, x))
(g(Ta'lt';i XTx)101g(alt;A,x)),
(A-32)
be obtained from Table 7.1 for most operators. For the unit operator 0 1, the matrix element
and
can
(A.32) takes, where v alt+ except for a trivial constant factor, the form e2 B' is matrix the and x given by (A+ TXT) (N 1) (N 1) Ta'It' =
-IbB'V
=
,
-
-
To
simplify the
SN-1,
a.el
=
aNtIV
=
we
SN,
---,
rename
alt,
afN-,eN-l
=
expressed by a (2N 2) by 9Bs, where B is expressed in
6B'v
Then
notation
matrix B
can
be
-
aN-1tN-1 a2N-2t2N-2 82N-2-
-=
si,
x
(2N
-.-,
-
2) symmetric
terms of B' and T
as
follows B
=
Thus the
(
B'
TB'
Bi TB'i
(A.33)
operation prescribed
in
Eq. (A.31)
can
be reduced to the
form N-
Oi",`
exp,
(2IBs
+ ibs
))
(A.34) .1=0'---'12M-2=0, 1=0,---,'2N-2=0
A.2 Correlated Gaussians with different coordinate sets
259
with
(A.35)
i9ail 0-Til-m Here the factor iv-s is included because it is needed in the
case
of the
potential energy matrix elements. See Table 7.1. It is worthwhile noting that the present formulation leads to a unified prescription of Eq. (A.34), which is independent of the choice of the relative coordinate sets but requires only a very simple calculation of the matrix B. It would be extremely tedious if one were to try to rewrite the anguN 1 lar function of fL'=I Yj . (x'.) in terms of those angular functions 3 conforming to the coordinates x. Using Leibniz's formula we can express Eq. (A.34) as 3
2
2
T
=1
Aj! (Ij
'XiAi 2N-2
Oj"
X
3
exp
-
Ai)! (Ai
(1i Mj)! (1i
-
-
-
Mi)! mi
-
Ai
+
Ai)!
(2 Os) -ri=O
2N-2
ai
X
(A.36)
ie, aj=O -ri=O
The last factor is
easily evaluated by using Eq. (6.58):
2N-2
11
ali-'Xi'mi-Ai e-vs i Ui=O -ri=O 2N-2
(A-37)
CIi-'XiMi-/-tiY1i-)LiMi-Ai(Wi)-
Possible values of Ai and [ii are determined by the conditions that O 0, 6(1, w) (-I)' for w < 0. In the of the form an integral =
cc
Y
2n+1+2
-2 vn+l+a2 where
n
guerre
polynomial (10.15).
a
Ivy 2
e-2
r-(2n)!! w I' is
(A.81)
7
eXp
ij(jwjy)dy
(W2 ) L('+'!) ( W2) 2
2v
non-negative integer and
n
Ln(')(x)
We define the
2v
(A.82)
is the associated La-
following integral
I(v, n, 1, u, v, IwI; V) 0
fo JO
CO
X
2v+1+2
Y
2n+1+2
1
e-
UX2
_
IvY2
V(x)il(lwlxy)dxdy
Three-body problein
A.5
1
with
00
x
2u+1+2
central,
IUx2 F
--
e
tensor and
spin-orbit
forces
271
(A.83)
V(x)l(n, 1, v, lwlx)dx.
0
The one-dimensional
integration
the functional form of
special
ated. In the
V(x),
case
can
when
be
V(x)
I(v, n, 1, u, v, IwI; V=1) n
X
equation, depending on analytically or numerically evalu-
in the above
=
1
we
obtain
(2n)!!F (n + I +
8
F(k + U + + 1) 2 kl.(n k)!F(k + I +
w2)
2
given
in
we axe
(k I q)
,
(A.84)
Eq. (7.8).
ready
to calculate the matrix elements. The
tween the functions in different Jacobi sets k and q
separately
k+v+l+A2
matrix elements
(iii)overlap Now
n+l+ 2
2v
2
where F is the Gamma function
V
(w2)k
-
k=O
3
2
in the space,
=
spin and
can
overlap be-
be calculated
isospin parts:
( pc(k, pq) I Wycl (q, kp)) "I" 0
=
X
JLLI JSSI (.FL'ML (k, pq) I )7LMI (q, kp))
(X'SMS (k,pq)IX" SMS (q,kp))(,qtTm,(k,pq)lqt
m,(q,kp))(A.85)
The
spin part
is
easily obtained by using Eq. (A.80)
(X'SMS (k, pq) I X" SMS (q, kp))
=
(- 1)
" +'-S 2
as
.1 S U (.1 .1; 2 22
s's) -(A.86)
Likewise, the isospin part becomes
(,qtTM, (k, pq) lqt'TMT (q, kp))
=
( _j)-!+t-TU(I22ITI; 2 tt). 2
(A.87)
of the space part can be performed by transforming the function in the bra to the one depending on the qth Jacobi coordinate. By substituting Eqs. (A.69) and (A-70) we obtain (the The
integration
suffix q to label the coordinate set is
(-'FL'ML (k, pq) I
"
(q, kp))
=
suppressed
E L3(kq) (aa) L
in the
integral)
Appendix
272
X
if
x
2P+X+2Y'+)L" 2fz+[+2n'+I'- 2IUX2_lVy2_WX.,y e
y
(Y'X) oi, m) *Y(""/
X
LML
(A.88)
dx dy
LML
with
U= +o
V
=!+-t
The
angular integration
and
(A.74)
can
w
be done
=S+j'. easily by
(A-89) the
use
of
Eqs. (A.81)
as
e- wX-Y
(YL(
ML
( C' m
d
L ML
_X-+ +I1,E(r w) Ety.OX'1"LL i.(Iwlxy). V2_x
4w
(A.90)
easily verify that 1+1'-r, has to be even and non-negative, and then one can use the integral formula (A.84) to obtain One
can
(.FL'ML (k, pq) I
"'
-1
LML
(q, kp))
4y"13(kq) Ir
,
X
I
X + 16 (M' W) EX"jj'-0,X'1 K Vf2-1
L
(P+vl+
A+AI-K 2
2
'K,U, V,
"
LL
IWI;
V=I) (A.91)
(iv) matrix elements of kinetic energy operator The next step is the calculation of the matrix elements of the kinetic energy operator
(k ITrel I q)
=
(W,, , (k, pq) ITq I W& d (q, kp)).
In the above
erator
can
(A.65)),
expression be expressed
and thus
we
(A.92)
used the fact that the kinetic energy opin different relative coordinate sets (see Eq.
we
defined Tr,,l in
conformity
with the coordinate
set in the ket. To calculate the matrix elements of the kinetic energy
operator
one
(X
first notes that
2v+.X
Y
2n+l
e-.21 ,6.2_:I_YY2_,E._y YLM
A.5
Three-body problem
30X2 X X
-2(
Y
2n+1
e
Y
x
-
20(2v + A)X2
e
2Y(2z/ + 2/X +
1))
4 M
F3 7F
1, _.L,3X2_ YY2_,5x.y 2
13X2)
I
LM
+
+I
(2v
-
Ox 2)
x
proof of this
+
273
EU(A-I1Ll;AK)C(11;K)Y('X-I
-V2A A
spin-orbit forces
LM
(2v + 2A +
X
tensor and
2_1 --Ox ilyy 2_,SX.y Y. (,Xj) 2
2v+X-1 2n+l+l
x
central,
02X4 + j2X2Y2
+
21/+)L-2
with
(A.93)
LM
relation is
given
in Exercise A.6. A similar
expression
holds for the second relative coordinate y. By the help of the above equation the effect of the kinetic energy operator applied on the basis function is
given by
a
linear combination of terms akin to the basis
function. The matrix element of the kinetic energy can therefore be given by repeatedly using the expression obtained for the overlap of the basis function.
(v) matTix
elements
The central V
=
=
of central potentials two-body interaction can be
V(I'r2
V(Xl-)
that is, the
7'3
-
+
1)
V(Irl
+
V(X2)
potential
is
+
-
T3
1)
+
V(jrI
as
-r2
1)
V(X3)
a sum
of terms
coordinate in different Jacobi sets. In for the
written
(A.94) depending on the first relative calculating the matrix element
case
(k I V(xp) I q)
=
( O,, (k, pq) I V(xp) I Wa,,, (q, kp)) -
JLLIJSSI(-'r-7LaML (k, pq) I V(xp) I.F&L (q, kp)) X
(X'SMS (k,pq)IX" SMS (q,kp))(TItTm,(k,pq)lqt
m,(q,kp)),
Appendix
274
(A.95) the
spin and isospin paxts
can
be calculated
as
before but the
spatial pth
functions in the bra and the ket have to be transformed into the
Jacobi coordinate set in which the potential is defined. The space paxt of the matrix element is calculated transformations k -+ p and q --+ p:
by using
the
"'
(FL'M,,(k,pq)IV(xp)l J,w, (q,kp)) L3(qp) (ala/) L
B(kp) (aa) L
(-'FL'M.,,(p,qk)IV(xp)IFL'
x
Here the matrices
corresponding
(A.96)
(p, qk)).
to the transformations
axe
defined
by T(kp) AT(kp)
A'
T(qP) A!T(qP)
=
(A.97)
respectively. By introducing +
U
one
+7
V
j+
W
(A.98)
&I
obtains
(.FL5'ML (p, q k) I V (xp) 1.FL 4 jr
X
IL
(p, q k))
/-2-r.+1,E(n, w) Et nOXI'P'LL
I(P+Vf+
+
2
ii+?P+
2
K) U, V,
IWI;
V)
-
(A.99) (vi) matrix
elements
of tensor potentials through
The tensor interaction is defined
SP
2 /-4r
V -5 (Y2 (ip ) [O'q '
X
Crk] 2)
-
the tensor operator
(11.7) (A.100)
A.5
Three-body problem
central,
with
tensor and
275
spin-orbit forces
To calculate the matrix element of the tensor interaction
one
has to
same steps as for the central interaction, except that now part of the wave function has to be taken into account, and the
follow the the
spin spin part should as
the
one
potential.
also be transformed into the
The
use
of the
coordinate system theorem (A. 14) enables
same
Wigner-Eckart
to obtain
(kjV(xp)Spjq)
-=
(W,,(k,pq) IV(xp)Spl W,,,e(q, kp))
U(L2JS; LS) ',E47 VF(-2L+ 1) (2S' 1) 247r 7r r 5
+
x
II (,)7L' (k, pq) II V(xp) Y2 (x-) P
x
(X'S (k, pq) II [Cq
x
(nTtMT(k, pq) Iq tm, (q, kp)).
X
FL',f (q, kp))
O'kj 2 11 X'S/ (q, kp))
(A.101)
spatial part of the matrix element is calculated as before by transforming the basis functions to the pth Jacobi coordinate set Here the
(Jc'L'(k,pq) 11 V(xp)Y2( p-) Ij.FL,(q,kp))
13() (a& ) L'
13(kp) (ad) L x
II FL',f (p, qk)), (YL' (p, qk) I I V(xp) Y2 (x-) P
where the last term is obtained
(JC L"(p, qk)
V( Xp) Y2 (Xp) ip
4ir
X
by using Eqs. (A.81) i
(A.102) and
(A.82)
as
(p, qk))
V2- r, + 1 c (r., w)
(YL' 1)
X
YO 2
0
Y2 (-
ii+?P+
O)
YL 2
r" U, V,
IWI;
V) (A.103)
Here u, v, w are defined in even and non-negative.
Eq. (A.98).
Note that
f+
r,
has to be
Appendix
276
The reduced matrix element of the
using
6.3)
angular paxt is calculated by recoupling technique (see Complement
the
and
angular momentum Eq. (A.76). One obtains
YO (I
( Y.,L
K
YL(XI F) ( c
Y2 ( 0)
I
U(2n2r,; WO) Q2K; W) Kf
X
(YL
Y2
01
Ll
/2r,'+ 1
EV
2K+I
C(2r.; K)EX LXII,-'L2.
(A.104)
The
spin matrix element is also easily calculated by transforming the spin functions to the pth Jacobi system and by using Eqs. (A.147)
(A. 149)
and
as
(X'S (k, pq) 11 [Crq =
X
Uk]2 11 X" S" (q, kp))
E(-l).2k+g-SU(-nS-1; S) E(-1)-!+""-S'U(.! 2
22
X
(X S (p, qk)
[G'q
X
2
Ok] 2 11
22
XS P, (p, qk)),
2
(A.105)
where
(X S (p, qk) 11 [Uq
X
Uk12 11
XS P, (p, qk))
(2S + 1
(_I)s,,-St+s-g V X
(("221) 9 11 [O'q
X
29+1
U(Ii S2; S'9) 2
UkI 2 11 ("22'0 i
(A.106)
with
(('1'1)9 11 [O'q 22
X
4+ (vii) matrix The
Uk12 11 1
elements
spin-orbit force
22
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
8
2
(,V6) 2 =2v/_5JgjJ pj.
9
of spin-orbit potentials given through the operator (11.9)
is
(A.107)
277
A.5 Three-body problem with central, tensor and spin-orbit forces
with
LV Sp -
As in the
case
Lp
=
-ixp
Sp
Vp,
I =
2
(0'q+ffk)- (A.108)
of the tensor interaction, with the
Eckart theorem
(A.14)
(kjV(xp)Lp-Spjq)
one
_=
use
of the
Wigner-
obtains
( o,,,(k,pq) IV(xp)Lp-Spl W,,,,(q, kp))
U(L'lJS; LS)
r
+ 1) + -1)(2S' V-(2L x
x
(FE'(k,pq) 11 V(xp)Lp 11 FL, (q, kp))
(X'S (k, pq) I I Sp I I X'S, (q, kp)) (,qtTMT (k, pq) lqt'TMT (q, kp)).
(A.109) spatial part of the matrix element is calculated as before by transforming the basis functions to the pth Jacobi coordinate set
The
V (xp) Lp
(.FL' (k, p q)
YL, (q, kp))
L3(qp) (af&i) LI
L3L(kp) (aa)
(.FL5 (p, qk) 11 V(xp)Lp 11 Jc'L",(p, qk)).
x
When the orbital
angular
momentum
(A.110)
operator
acts
on
the basis
(provided both the basis function and the operator in the same coordinate system) one obtains
function
pressed L
(x
A0 e--21- '3X2 _!IY _IYI _,5X_y YL(M
21/+X 2n+1
Y
ij(x
X
Y)X" +A Y2n+l e_21,3x
2v+,\ 2n+1
+X
Y
Note that the outer
vf2-[x
x
yll_,,
=
axe ex-
1)3X2
e- 2
1 _
'f
YY2
product i(x
X
(4-\,F2-x13)xyYj(,',1)
2_1
'YY
2_dX.y
YLI'Xj) (ic M
A0 -6"YLYL(M
y),, ).
is
equal
(A.111) to the tensor
Therefore the
product
spatial part
of
tained in
element, (.FL6(p, qk) 11 V(xp)L, 11 J:L` ,(p, qk)), can be obexactly the same way as in the central potential. It is given
by
of two terms: One is
the matrix
a sum
47r
4vf2-7 3
X
J
vf2-_K+I c (K, w)
(YL` r) ( C' m I I YO(Kn) ( C' m YI(I-I-) ( C' m I I YL(" F") (:t' o
Appendix
278
(P+1/1+
X1
n+W+
2
K) U, V,
2
IWI;
V)
(A.112) and the other is
v/2 r. + 1 E (r,, w) (YL(
4-,T
YO(MM) (i
,
Fj+P+
X
fi+??+
2
L
KI U1 V,
2
II
YL(fk'[')
IWI; V (A.113)
Eq. (A.98). Note that in the first term and non-negative, and likewise in the second term I + 11 r. has to be even and non-negative. The angulax part in the first term can be obtained by using Eqs. Here u, v,
T+ P
+ 1
w
-
axe
r,
defined in
has to be
even
-
(A.74)
(A.76)
and
as
YO( MIS)
(YL
YI(l 1)
YL
(A.114)
pq
pq
The
angular part
(YL(
( b,
in the second term becomes
YO(K n)
YL(',"
L
i, L
L
YL(, "")
(A.115)
where
(YL(X"")
L
(_,)L-L" V
YLI 2-L+ 1
2XI +I
U
L 1; L'XI) (I
Xi,
i
L
YX, ( b)
(A.116) with
(Yl(;k) 11
L
11 Yl(.-b))
=
0(1 + 1)(21 + 1).
The spin matrix element action. The result is
can
be calculated
(A.117) as
in the tensor inter-
A.5
Three-body problem with central,
(x'S (k, pq) I I Sp I I
tensor and
spin-orbit
X'S'/ (q, kp))
-21+-SU('.!S.1; Sg) E(-I) 12+S'-S'U(.1 22
1
22
2
x
279
forces
(X S (p, qk) 11 Sv 11 X S-', (p, qk)),
S' 1;
(A.118)
where
(X'S (p, qk) I I Sp II X'S'f (p, qk))
S+IU (Iksi; Sg) =29+ S+I
-S,+S-
X
2
1
2
(("I22'1) 9O'q + Uk I I (I22'I) k)
(A.119)
with + O'k ((*"1) 22 9O'q
22
R)
8+1 E: 122 U(-! -191; '9
2+
206-JgJi j.
06-1) 2
((- 1)
-j;
+
1) (A.120)
Complements
280
Complements A. I Mabix elements
central
o
potentials
The matrix element of the central and tensor
potentials
can
be ob-
tained
through a step which is slightly different from the procedure presented in Appendix A. 1.3. Then the formula becomes simpler than Eq. (A.21). Here we outline the step which leads to this simpler result. Instead of using Eq. (A.19), we first perform the integration over the angle i6 in Eq. (A. 17), which leads to Tj I r2
(fK'LIMI (7Z, X, X) [
e
47r
(2r)N-2
BKLBKILI
detB
_.LCT2
X
YLMWYLIMfO )*
x
exp
[
r)
A2
+
q/A/2 +
YxIL ( ri
-
rj ) I fKLM (u,
A, x))
3 2
c) if
d& d
'
d2K+L+2K+L" dA2K+LdA/2K'+Ll
AA/e. et] in (rV)Y"'j#Y)
(A.121)
Wi0 V
=
-tAe + -Y'Ye'.
(A.122)
If either -y or -y' vanishes, v is independent of the scalar product e-e', and the integration and the differentiation prescribed in Eq. (A.121) becomes very easy. When neither -y nor 2 exponent can be expressed in terms of v
qA2 + qiA/2 + pAA'e P
2-y-y' One first has to
V
2
+
-
-y'
is zero, the term in the
as
e'
(q_ 2-y
expand
A2
+
(qf
A 2) i,,,(rv) exp(2-y,,1V
(see Eq. (6.48) expansion). Secondly, multiplied by the spherical haxmonic coupled
(A.123)
in terms of powers of
for the
the
A/2.
2-/
its
general term v expanded
must be
v
2n+n
in
The second step can [YL ( -_) x YL, (,E )] In this derivation one can avoid Eq. (6.7).
tensor form of
be done with the
use
of
recoupling the angular momenta, and hence possible formula for the matrix element.
would get the
simplest
CA. 1 Matrix elements of central potentials In the
with
x
make
following we work out the details for the central potential However, we shall not follow the above route exactly but
0.
=
a
281
little detour in order to make transparent the relation to the matrix element. To this end we rewrite the left-hand side of
overlap Eq. (A.123)
as
follows:
A2 + I A/2 The term Hermite
V2 2c
e
+
pAA/ e. e/
qX2 + q'A12 + PAA/ e. e
=
jo (VV) is expanded in
powers of
V2. (A.124)
with the
use
of the
polynomials:
2c)
V
exp
-
i o (r v)
2c)
V =_
exp
1
-
2rv
(e'r
00
,,F2c Next
v
2c
we
expand
exp q A2 +
q' A/2
n=0
exp
+
(2n + 1)!
H2n+l
V
V22 r) (V2c2)n. C
c,
(qA2 + q'A/2 + pAAI e. ef)
p,\A'e
H(p -ra, qA2)H(pI
e'
-
-
) (2c V2)n -
(,,2,)n 2c
as
(A.125) follows:
ni _
(2
n , q'A/2 )H(I
H(M' 2A2 )H(a, 7/2,X/2 )H(n
-rv)
e
-
m
PPIIMMI
-
-
n
+
+
m
m', pAA'e-e)
a, 27-yAYe-e)
1: FPnPj (c, q, q, P, t,,Yf),X2p+'A/2p'+l (e-e')'
(A.126)
PPfj
with
Fpnp,,(c, q, q, p, 7,7')
n!
1: H(p
=
-
m,
q)H(p
I -
M
Iq
MW
x
7
Here p, p, I,m, and m' are all of their values are determined m
max(IL are
the
-
triangular relation
n
=
-
Possible values of L + L'
LJ, IM
2n
-
-
of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient
-
is
is
be
M'j) (L M K AV-
due to
MIL'IW). Furthermore, L-n L-n RLL'r. n
n2
=
L
-
note that under these conditions
we
is contributed
13
n,
n3
=
by
=
single
a
L'
-
n
in
term with
11
=
RnLjn2n3 L-lis
ni
Eq. (A.20). This
=
n,
12
=
=
is because
11 :! ni, 12 < n2, 13 :5 n3 and 11 + 12 > L, 11 + 13 ! L. Using the well-known formulas for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (10 P 0 1 L 0)
[751
and the Racah coefficient
U(n
L-n L r,; L'
L-n)
(2L 2n+ 1)! (2L' 2n)! (L +L' is) 1 (L +L' + n + 1) 1 (2L + 1)! (2L')! (L + L' 2n is) 1 (L +L' 2n + r, + 1)! -
-
-
-
-
-
(A-135) we
obtain the
following
result:
(fOLIMI'(Ul X, X)IJ(17VX -r)jfOLM(U, A, X) (2T) M-2
(
=
min(L,Ll)
2
3
1
cl e-'Ycr
detB
2
E pnL-nI/ IL-nrL+L'-2n n=O
L+L'-2n
1:
x
ZLL'nn (L M r, M
-MJL'M)
r.=max(jL-L'J, IM-M,'I) x
where
r.
Y. M'
--M
('0 *'
(A-136)
+ L + L' has to be
ZLLfnr.
-
(-1)
2
even
(L-L'+x)
and the coefficient
F 2L
given by
(2 +1)
T L, + L' + -+I)! JL-K)!(L
(2n)!! (L + V
-
F L-(LL --+L"5; L
x
is
47r K
-
x
ZLL'nr.
2n
-
n)!! (L + L'
-1i ((L ---LL++-'KS
-
2n +
x
+
1)!! (A-137)
CA.3 Overlap matrix elements for
With one can
an
J(ri
is defined in
(A.18)
appropriate choice of the (N
-
I)-dimensional
285
vector
w
calculate various matrix elements. To calculate the matrix
element of
with
one can
three-particle system
a
-
xN
-
r),
one
only needs
to set
w
equal
to
Eq. (2.12). The values of c, p, -y, -/' are obtained from Eq. w(ij) being replaced by 0). In exactly the same manner,
also calculate the matrix element of J(ri -rj -r)
the vector
w(') which
w('j),
defined in
Eq. (2.13),
for
w.
By using
by employing
the well-known
formula
J(iv-x -,r)
J(Ifvxl
-
r)
Y"11
r2 r.
WX
(A.138)
Y"tt
it
Eq. (A.136) immediately enables one to obtain the matrix element of the density multipole operator J(ji7vxj r)Y,,,,(w` _x). The matrix element for the central potential, V(j ri -rj 1), is obtainable from Eq. (A. 136) as well. By integrating the equation multiplied 0 contributes to by V(r) over r, we see that only the term with n the matrix element of the central potential. It is easy to see that the integration leads us to the same result as Eq. (A.133). -
=
Overlap matrix elements of the correlated Gaussians for a threeparticle system We tabulate in Table A.1 results of the calculation for the quantity A.3
/2N-2
61, i9aili (9-rili-mi
exp
( -2IS-Bs)
(A.139)
three-particle system (N 3) assun-Ang li < 2. The vector si is defined by aj(1 2), -2-ri). The calculation was done with i 2, i(l + Mathematica [1841. The quantity apparently has a symmetry property with respect to the interchange of li, mi +-+ 1j, mj. E.g., if one calculates this quantity for a given set of angular momenta, then the quantity corresponding to a set (111 MI 13 M3 12 M2 14 M4) can easily be obtained from it by simply interchanging the suffices 2 and 3 of the B matrix. Note that the table can be used for the four-paxticle system as well if one of the angular momenta is restricted to zero. for the
=
1
,
,
1
1
1
Complements
286
Table A.I. Tabulation of
Eq. (A.139) for
the
three-particle system. The
*Tj 2, i(l +7,i 2), -2-ri).
The matrix B is a 4x4 by (1 symmetric matrix and its elements are denoted a B12, b B137 C B34. The tenth to twelfth colunu3.s give the B23, eB241 f B14, d types and the coefficients of terms needed to construct the solution, where each coefficient must be multiplied by a factor given in the ninth column of the corresponding entry. For example, in the case of 11 12 MI M2 -2, 14 2, 13 2, M3 2, M4 -2, the quantity of Eq. (A. 139) is given by 12288 x (3b 2e2 + 3c2d2 + 12bcde). vector si is defined
ai
-
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
11
MI
12
M2
=
=
=
13
M3
=
=
=
=
14
M4
--
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
-1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
-4
192
f
f2
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
-2
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
-1
-1
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
1
32
ef
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
-2
6
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
-1
-3
0
0
1
1
1
-1
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
-1
2
1
-1
0
0
1
-1
1
-1
2
2
1
16
I
1
1
0
1
0
1
-1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
af
be
cd
1
1
1
(Continued
on
the next
page.)
CA.3
(Continued
Overlap
matrix elements for
from Table A. I.)
a
three-particle system,
-
1536
def
0
0
2
2
2
0
2
-2
-2
0
0
2
2
2
-1
2
-1
3
0
0
2
1
2
1
2
-2
2
0
0
2
1
2
0
2
-1
-1
0
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
256
af2
bef
cdf
I
1
1
2
0
2
-2
-6
-6
1
1
1
2
-1
2
-1
9
9
1
1
0
2
1
2
-2
1
1
1
0
2
0
2
-1
6
1
1
1
-1
2
2
2
-2
-3
1
1
1
-1
2
1
2
-1
3
1
1
1
-1
2
0
2
0
-3
1
0
1
0
2
2
2
-2
3
1
0
1
0
2
1
2
-1
-3
-3
-3
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
3
4
4
1
0
1
-1
2
2
2
-1
1
0
1
-1
2
1
2
0
1
-2
-1
1
-1
2
2
2
0
-1
-1
-1
1
-1
2
1
2
1
1
1
b2e2 acdf
C2d2
3
3
3
-6 -6 3
-1
-1
3
12288
a2f2 abef
bede
2
2
2
2
2
-2
2
-2
2
2
2
1
2
-1
2
-2
-3
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
-2
3
2
2
2
0
2
-1
2
-1
2
1
2
1
2
0
2
-2
2
1
2
1
2
-1
2
-1
12
-6 2
2
2
-3
-3
6
-2
4
3
3
3
3
6
4
-5
-5
3
3
3
6
6
6
-2
2
2
1
0
2 2
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
-3
-1
0
287
Exercises
288
Exercises
Eq. (A.14).
A.I. Derive
Noting the definition of the scalar product (11.2), expanding the angular momentum coupled ket functions, e.g., Solution.
(LS) JM)
E
=
in
Eqs. (11.1) and
states of bra and
(Lm, SM2 I JM) Lrni) I SM2)
(A.140)
TaIM2
and
using the Wigner-Eckart theorem (A. 12),
((L'S') JM 1
we
have
(0,, (space) 0,,, (spin)) (LS) JM) -
1) 1'(Lm, SM2 I JM) (LW1 SW2 I JM) AMIM2M'MI 1 2
X
X
The
-vF2-L'+1
(SM2K --PISIMf2) (S' 11 0,,(spin) V12--S'+1
of
use
a
one
(A.141)
S).
=
(-1)IS
+
V
2S+1
(KILSIMf2 I SM2)
to rewrite the above matrix element
((L'S') JIVI 1 (-W X
L)
symmetry property of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
(SM21S --AISIMI) 2 enables
(L' 11 0,,(space)
(A.142)
as
(0,, (space) Q, (spin)) I (LS) JM) -
(V 11 0,,(space) 11 L)(S' 11 0,,(spin) 11 S) + + 1) -1)(2S V/(-2L'
E
(Lm1r,/LJL'm'I)(L'm'IS'm'2JJM)
JL'ra1M2?-afIM2r x
(Lm1SM2JJM)(K.ASITnI2JSTn2)-
(A.143)
sum over A, Tn1 , M2 , MfJ , TnI2 of the product of the four ClebschGordan coefficients is just the recoupling coefficient U(Lr.JS';L"S)
The
(see Eq. (6.67)).
This
complets
the derivation.
Exercises
289
A generalization to the matrix element of a coupled tensor operator be made similarly. Let us calculate the matrix element
can
((L',5 )XM'j [01(space)
x
Ox(spin)j,,, J(LS)JM
(LIMI1 SIM/2 I JM) (Lm, SM2 I JM) (1mAp I rw) MIMMIM2MA 2 1
(Lmj1mjL'm ,f2--L'+
11
The
(L'
01(space) 11 L)
(SMALI S/ M2I) (S' V -2-Sl+1
OX(spin) 11 S).
sum over
?n j, m'2
,
Tn1 , M2 i M7 A
of the
(A-144)
product of the five Clebsch-
Gordan coefficients
(LmISM2 I JM) (1mXMjnv) (LmIlmILal) MIM2MtlMflM'2 X
can
be taken
by
(STn2l\l-tlS'M2)(VM'IS'M'21XM')
means
(JMr,vIYM')
of the
unitary 9j symbol
L
S
J
I
A
K
L'
S'
X
(A.145)
as
(A-146) _
_
multiply Eq. (A.145) by (JMr'VjYAF) and sum over M and v with M' being fixed, then what one has is a sum of the product of six Clebsch-Gordan coefficients involving nine angular momenta, and it is nothing but the 9j symbol in unitary form given in Eq. (A.146) (see Eq. (6.78)). Then with the help of the orthogonality relation of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients Eq. (A.145) itself has to be equal to (A.146). Substituting this result into Eq. (A.144) and using To derive this result
the definition of the reduced matrix element
((L'S')X 11 [01(space)
x
+
obtains
0,\(spin)l,, 11 (LS)J) L
2JI + 1
(2LI
one
1) (2SI + 1)
S
1
A
P
S,
J
-
x
(L'
01 (space)
L) (S' I I 0,\ (spin)
S).
(A.147)
Exercises
290
special by using
In and
cases one can
(S' 11111 S)
=
set A
=
0
or
1
=
0 in the above formula
JSS, A/2S +I
derive useful formulas
as
(A.148)
given below:
((L'S')J' 11 01(space) 11 (LS)J)
jssl(_I)L-J+J-L' V1-2LI-j,-+1U(SLXl;JL) +I
(L' 11 01(space) 11 L .
x
((L'S')X 11 OX(spin) JLLI
(A.149)
(LS)J)
V TS-,+-, U(LSJA; JS) (S'
Ox (spin)
S).
(A.150) A.2. Derive
Solution.
Eq. (A.19).
Using Eq. (6.18),
we
have
(e. e ) ni (e. r) n2 (ef.,r) n3
Y,
rn2 +n3
E
Y,
BkllBk2l2Bk3l3
2ki+1,,=nj. 2k2+12=n2 2k3+13=n3
(-1)11+12+13-v/'(211
I)T(2172 1) (2K3 +T) [Y11 ( -)
[y12 (' -) Xy12 ('0100 [Y13 0 ) As
was
done in Exercise 6.1
IY12 0
X
Y12 (f9]OO [y13 0 12 13
12 13
0
X
0
X
Y13 ('06'
(see Eq. (6-106)),
)
X
y13 0
0100
(A.151)
we
recouple the product
0
Q12 13; "0 11Y12 (0-)
2K+1 +
Y711 (
)100
-
212
X
1) (213
+
1)
Q12 13; K)
X
Y13 0
)Ir-
X
Yr-(f6)100
Exercises
1[Y12 (P-)
X
X
Y13
0 )I
r-
X
YK M 1 00'
(A.152)
The last step is to combine the two scalar
1YII (10
X
Y11 (0
IRY11 (P-)
X
Y13 (
)100 RY12 ( -)
X
0 )10
[Y12
Y11
X
EELI111101213r-r- [[YL(&)
X
I)JrX
291
products X
Y13
Lf( I&
Y
follows:
YK00100
0 )]KlrX
as
YIs (j
X
Yr-00100
)100,
(A.153)
LL'
given by Eq. (A.75). When one of the angular momenta is zero, the 9j symbol is reduced to the Racah coefficient (see Eq.(6.86)). Using this simplification in the coefficient E and substituting the above results completes the derivation.
where the coefficient E is
A.3. Calculate the matrix element of the orbital
IAjj
angular
momentum
for the correlated Gaussians.
Solution. The matrix element of tween the
gration
lAij
be obtained from that be-
can
generating functions of Table 7.1 or by performin the intein Eq. (A.23) with V(r) being set to unity. The result
over r
is
(fK'L'M'(Ul
i
A
10) 1 IjLjj I fKLM (u, A, x))
BKLBKILI
ff
(
(2v) M-1 detB
3
)
2
1 c
*Y, +,q,-Y) d2K+L+2K+L'
dMi YLm ( _) YL, m, (o )
AAexp
dA2K+LdX12K-+L'
[q A2 + q1 A/2 + pAYe-e'] i(e x e),, (A.154)
The
integration
over
_ and
o
can
be done
by using the formula
ff de^_d4! YLm( -_)YL,m,(, )*(i(e e),,(e-e')') x
4
_2
1
e=I,eI=1
110111, d,T V '2__Ll+1 (LMIjLjL'M) E Bklv _21+IEW 2k+l=n
Exercises
292
(A.155) Clearly I has to be L I and also L' 1. In order that a possible value L' or IL L'I 2 has to be satisfied. The latter of 1 exists, either L case is obviously impossible because the condition IL L'I < I has to =
=
-
-
be met. Thus
we
equal, otherwise
QL-I 1; L)
reach the
the
conclusion that L and L' must be
same
integral
would vanish.
7r(2L 3L
3(L 1) 3(L 7(L2L 47(2L 7F(2L 1)' +
QL+1 1; L)
____
-
Using
47r(2L + 1)'
+
-
2+L
U(L-llLl;Ll)=
V:2LL+
U(L+l IM; L1)
2
(A.156) together
with the relation 2k + 2L + 1
BkL-1 we can r
=
2k+L
BkLi
2k+L
Bk-Li (A.157)
show that 11
JJ dM4 YLm( -)YL,Iv,(i )*(i(eJLLI VFL (L In order for the
and
2k
Bk-I L+I
+
x
1) (LMly I LM)
integral not
to
vanish,
e'),(e-e)'
n
+1
(A.158)
Bn+I-L
n+I
2
-
L must be
non-negative
even.
Employing this Eq. (A.6)
leads to
result in a
Eq. (A. 154)
and
compaxing its result with
solution
(fKILIMI (u!, X, X) 11pi, IfKLM(u, A, x))
05LL'1\1L(L + 1) (LMI[tILM) 1 X
-
PC
As
a
('Y?71 + 7177) (fKI LM (W, X, X) I fKLM (u, A, x)).
check of the above
formula,
one
the matrix element of the total orbital 2
7
I:i<j IlLij (see
^11,q)
can
be
Therefore,
Eq. (2.22)).
easily
we
The
done with the
sum-ma
use
of
may
use
angular i n,
(A.159)
this to calculate
momentum
over
i
i=l
where
mij's
and
li's
are
all
non-negative integer and
must
satisfy the
following relations K
K
mij
=
k,
mij +
j>i=l
(i
ni
K).
1,
(A. 172)
Eq. (A.93).
Solution. First
(
=
j=1
A.6. Derive
x
E mji + li
x
2
we
note that
(Al) '+Ae-2IpX2_,5X.y YLM 41
M)
(,Axe- .j'8X2_jx.Y) X2v+Ay(,Xl) 2
+
LM
e-12 jax 2-,6X.y A.'X 21/+Ay(,\I) LM PC
+2
(Vxe-2.jpX2_jx`.Y) (VXX -
M)
2v+,X
AI) YL(M P9M
The differentiation in the second term of the
above equation
(AxX
2v+,\
can
be
right-hand side
performed by using Eq. (6.59)
AO
I
The third term
can
be
reduced, by
means
to
(Vxe- .IpX2_jX.y 2
of the
as
AI) YL(M
2v(2z/ + 2A + I)x 2v+,X-2 YL(M PC M (A.42),
(A.173)
VXX
2v+A
AI) YL(M (ic'
of the
(A.174) gradient formula
Exercises
X2v+X-l e
F+' OX
1
oX2 -,6x.,y
(2v + 2A + 1)
1
-A-+I 2A+1
297
YX-1 ('' )4
X
X
Y' Ml LM
2v[[(- x-Jy)XYX+I( 3)11\Xyl( )ILM (A.175)
By using the angular momentum algebra the equation is reduced to
first term in the round
bracket of the above
[[(-OX
-
JY)
,rL3
X
Y)'-' POD'
X
Y' M] LM
OxC(1A-I;A)YL(A')(:t, ) M
+ Sy
U(A-1 I L 1; A r,) C(11; r)Y(X-l LM
2A+lt XYL A
X1) M
Jy E U(A
r.)
( O,
-
11 L 1; A
K) C(11; r,) YLM
K
(A.176) where
use
Similarly
is made of
Eq. (A.156)
for
C(l A
-
1;
A)
C(A
-
11; A).
the second term becomes
11(- X-*X YA+'(" )IXX Y1MILM XY(,X1) L M PC M I
yE U(A+I ILI; Ais)C(11; r,)YL(A+1r')(1b, M
The contribution of the first term is
(A.177)
easily obtained by using
Exercises
298
2 e- .l#X2_,5X.y
+
1
02X2 + j2y2 + 2,3dx -,y) e-'2,8X
where the last term
involving
the scalar
2
product
-,5x.y
(A.178)
1
x
-
y
can
be reduced
to X.
Y Y(Ai) LM
=
,
E
-v -3[x
x
y]oo0'1) LM
U(11 ; 0"0 Ry
X
[X
X
Ily
X
YA-1 4A A
X
Y' MI LM
_X
Ry
X
Y +'P
X
YI(MILM*
-V
3
X
Y
X
1WILM
Y
r.=Al
2,X + I
(A.179)
right-hand side of the above equation appear Eqs. (A.176) and (A.177), respectively. Combining these results we obtain the desired equality (A.93) The two terms of the
Ax
(X
2 Ll +,X
l,3X2_,6x.y
e-2
AI) YL(M
30X2 +,32X4 + j2X2Y2 + 2zj(2i/ + 2A +
2 -2Sx 2v+A-l y e-LPx
I
X
x
):+
TA
I
in
1)) 2
X
1 _
-
20(271 + A)X2
2v+,X-2
2
_,SX.y
LpX2_jX.y
e- 2
V/
YL(M
7F
3
(2y + 2A + 1_ OX2)
EU(A-IlLl;Aiz)C(11;K)YL(A-l)(. c, ) M
Is
'A+I -
2A +I
x
(2y
_
OX2)
I:U(A+IILI;Ar,)C(11;r,,)YL K
M
(A.180)
References
Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu and F. Lalo6, Quantum Mechanics (A Wiley-Interscience publication, Hermann and John Wiley & Sons, Paris, 1977). 2. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1961). 3. H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One and Two Electron Atoms (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957). 4. A. Theophilou, J. Phys. C12, 5419 (1979). 5. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University Press, 1989). 6. D. H. Weinstein, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20, 529 (1934). 7. S. Goedecker and K. Maschke, Phys. Rev. B44, 10 365 (1991). 8. G. Temple, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A211, 204 (1952). 9. M. A. Abdel-Raouf, Phys. Rep. 84, 163 (1982). 10. C. J. Umrigar, K. G. Wilson and J. K. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, I. C.
1719
(1988).
11. J. A. Carlson and R. B.
1, ed. K.
Wiringa,
in
Computational Nuclear Physics Koonin, (Springer-Verlag,
J. A. Maruhn and S. E.
Langanke, Berlin, 1991), p. 171. 12. Y. Akaishi, International Review of Nuclear Physics, Vol. 4, Cluster Models and Other Topics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986), p. 259. 13. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953). 14. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flanney, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, 2nd edition, (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992). 15. D. Cvijovic and J. Klinowski, Science 267, 664 (1995). 16. P. Serra, F. Stanton and S. Kais, Phys. Rev. E55, 1162 (1997). 17. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelett. Jr. and M. P. Vecchi, Science 220, 671
(1983). Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and MaLearning (Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989). M. W. Schmidt and K. Ruedenberg, J. Chem. Phys. 71., 3951 (1979). M. Kamimura, Phys. Rev. A38, 621 (1988). A. J. Thakker and V. H. Smith, Jr., Phys. Rev. A15, 1 (1977); A15,
18. D. E.
chine
19. 20. 21.
16(1977). Alexander, H. J. Monkhorst and K. Szalewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5821 (1986); 87, 3976 (1987); 89, 355 (1988).
22. S. A.
References
300
Monkhorst, Phys. Rev. A38, 26 (1988). Kukulln, V. M. Krasnopol'sky, V. T. Voronchev and P. B. Sazonov, Nucl. Phys. A417,128 (1984). H. Kameyama, M. Kamimura and Y. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. C40, 974
23. S. A. Alexander and H. J. 24. V. L
25.
(1989). 26. M. Kamhnura and H.
Kameyama, Nucl. Phys. A508 17c, (1990). Krasnopol'sky, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Paxt. Phys.
27. V. L Kukulin and V. M.
3, 795 (1977).
Varga, Y. Suzuki and R. G. Lovas, Nucl. Phys. A371, 447 (1994). Arai, Y. Suzuki and K. Varga, Phys. Rev. C51, 2488 (1995). K. Varga, Y. Suzuki and I. Tanihata, Phys. Rev. C52, 3013 (1995). K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C52, 2885 (1995); Phys. Rev. A53, 1907 (1996). K. Varga, Y. Ohbayasi and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B396, 1 (1997). Y. Suzuki J. Usukura and K. Varga, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.
28. K. 29. K.
30. 31. 32. 33.
31, 31 (1998).
Rychlewski, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1252 (1993). Bukowski, Jeziorski, S. Rybak and K. Szalewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 888 102, (1995); B. Jeziorski, R. Bukowski and K. Szalewicz, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 61, 769 (1997). R. Krivec, M. I. Haftel and V. B. Mandelzweig, Phys. Rev. A44, 7158
34. W. Cencek and J. 35. R.
36.
B.
(1991). Baker, R. N. Hill and J. D. Morgan III, in Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, Proceedings of the Program held on Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms at the Institute of Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, CA, 1988, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 189, ed. W. Johnson, P. Mohr and J. Sucher (AIP, New York, 1988), p. 123. H. De Raedt and M. Frick, Phys. Rep. 231, 109 (1993). A. Mushinski and M. P. Nightingale, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 8831 (11994). M. H. Kalos, D. Levesque and L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. A9, 2178 (1974). J. G. Zabolitzky and M. H. Kalos, Nucl. Phys. A356, 114 (1981); J. G. Zabolitzky, K. E. Schmidt and M. H. Kalos, Phys. Rev. C25, 1111
37. J.
38.
39. 40. 41.
(1982). Carlson, Phys. Rev. C36, 2026 (1987). von der Linden, Phys. Rep. 220, 53 (1992). B. L. Hammond, W. A. Lester, Jr. and P., J. Reynolds, Monte Carlo Methods in Ab 1-nitio Quantum Chemistry (World Scientffic, Singapore,
42. J.
43. W. 44.
1994). Alhassid, D. J. Dean, S. E. Koonin, G. Lang and W. E. Ormand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 613 (1994). R. Krivee and V. B. Mandelzweig, Phys. Rev. A42, 3779 (1990). R. Jastrow, Phys. Rev. 79, 389 (1950). R. Krivec, M. L Haftel and V. B. Mandelzweig, Phys. Rev. A47, 911
45. Y. 46.
47. 48.
(1993). Ripelle, Ann. of Phys. 147, 281 (1983). Avery, Hyperspherical Harmonics, Application in Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).
49. M. Fabre de la 50. J.
References
301
Lin, Phys. Rep. 257, 1 (1995). Faddeev, Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 1014 (1961); Mathematical Aspects of the Three-Body Problem in the Quantum Scattering Theory (Steklov Mathematical Institute, Leningrad, 1963 [English translation: Israel Program for Scientific. Translation, Jerusalem, 19651 and John Wiley & Sons, Paris, 1977). 53. E. W. Schmid and H. Ziegelmann, The Quantum Mechanical ThreeBody Problem (Pergamon, Oxford, 1974). 54. W. G16ckle, The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983). W. G16ckle, H. Witala, D. Hdber, H. Kamada and J. Golak, Plays. Rep. 274, 107 (1996). 55. Y. Wu, S. Ishikawa and T. Sasakawa, Few-Body Systems 15, 145 51. C. D. 52. L. D.
(1993). Papp and W. Plessas, Phys. Rev. C54, 50 (1996). Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953). P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Yuclear Many-Body Problem (SpringerVerlag, New York, 1980). Y. C. Tang, Microscopic Description of the IVuclear Cluster Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 145 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981), p.
56. Z.
57. D. L. HUI and J. A. 58. 59.
571. 60. D.
Brink, Proceedings of the I-nternational School of Physics "Enrico Fermi", Course 36 (1965), ed. C. Bloch, (Academic Press, New York and London, 1966), p.247. 61. S. F. Boys, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A258, 402 (1960). 62. K. Singer, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A258, 412 (1960). 63. S. Fantoni, L. Panattoni and S. Rosati, Nuovo Cimento A69, 81 (1970). 64. P. M. Kozlowski and L. Adamowicz, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6681 (1991). 65. D. B. Kinghorn and R. D. Poshusta, Phys. Rev. A47, 3671 (1993). 66. B. J. Persson and P. R. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 5915 (1996). 67. H. F. King, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 705 (1967). 68. G. W. F. Drake and Zong-Chao Yan, Phys. Rev. A46, 2378 (1992). 69. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Rev. A48, 4780 (1993). 70. A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957). 71. M. E. Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum, (Jobn Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957). 72. D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1968). 73. R. A. Sack, J. Math. Phys. 5, 252 (1964). 74. K. G. Kay, H. D. Todd and H. J. Silverstone, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2359
(1969). Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), p.
75. D. A. 168.
76. V.
Bargmann, Commun. Pure
and
Appl.
Math.
14,187 (1961).
References
302
Bargmann,
77. V.
in
Analytic
Methods in Mathematical
Gilbert and R. G. Newton
(Gordon
and
Physics, ed. R. Breach, New York, 1968),
P. p.
27.
Suzuki, J. Math. Phys. 24, 785 (1983). Bingel, Theoret. Chim. Acta 44, 9 (1977). 80. R. N. Hill, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 68, 357 (1998). 81. K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, Comp. Phys. Commun. 1.06, 157 (1997). 82. P. Schwerdtfeger and H. Silberbach, Phys. Rev. A37, 2834 (1988). 83. B. Dunlap, Phys. Rev. A42, 1127 (1990). 84. K. Varga, J. Usukura and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1876 (1998). 85. J. Usukura, K. Varga and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. A, in press (1998). 86. A. Martin, J.-M. Richard and T. T. Wu., Phys Rev. A52 (1992) 3695. 87. M. Iwasaki S. N. Nakamura, K. Shigaki, Y. Shimizu, H. Tamura, T. Ishikawa, R. S. Hayano, E. Takada, E. Widman, H. Outa, M. Aoki, P. Kitching and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1246 (1991). T. Yamazaki et al., Nature 361, 238 (1993). 88. 1. Shimamura, Phys. Rev. A46, 3776 (1992). 89. V. I. Korobov, Phys. Rev. A 54 R1749 (1996). 90. A. M. Frolov and V. H. Smith, Phys. Rev. A49, 3580 (1994). 91. A. K. Bhatia, Phys. Rev. A2, 1667 (1970). 92. A. M. Frolov, V. H. Smith, Jr. and D. M. Bishop, Phys. Rev. A49, 78. K. T. Hecht and Y.
79. B. Klahn and W. A.
(1994).
1686
D. M.
Bishop, A.
M. Frolov and V. H.
Smith, Jr., Phys.
A51,
Rev.
(1995).
3636
Vinitskil,
93. S. I.
Puzynina,
V. S.
Melezhik,
Ponomarev, I. V. Puzynin, T. P. Truskova, Sov. Phys. JETP 52, 353
L. I.
L. N. Somov and N. F.
(1980). 94. A.
Yeremin, A. M. Frolov and E.B. Kutukova, Few-Body Systems 4,
111(1988). 95. N. M. Cann and A. J.
Thakkar, Phys.
Rev.
A46,
Pekeris, Phys. Rev. 112, 1649 (1958). 97. J. A. Wheeler, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 48, 219
5397
(1992).
96. C. L.
(1946).
Mills, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 717 (1981). A. Hylleraas and A. Ore, Phys. Rev. 71, 493 (1947); A. Ore,
98. A. P. 99. E.
ibid.
71, 913 (1947); 83, 665 (1951).
Adamowicz, Phys. Rev. A48, 1903 (1993). Richard, Phys. A49, 3573 (1994). A. M. Frolov, S. I. Kryuchkov and V. H. Smith, Jr., Phys. Rev. A 51,
100. P. M. Kozlowski and. L.
101. J. M. 102.
4514
Rev.
(1995).
Smith, Jr., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, L433 (1996); Phys. Rev. A55, 2662 (1997). 104. D. Bressanini, M. Mella and G. Morosi, Phys. Rev. A55, 200 (1997). 105. R. C. Miller, D. A. Kleinman, A.C. Gossard and 0. Muntenau, Phys. 103. A. M. Frolov and V. H.
Rev.
B25,
6545
(1982).
106. E. I. Rashba and M. D.
Sturge,
Excitons
(North-Holland,
New
York,
1982). 107. Zhong-Chao Yan and G. W. F. 108. 1
Drake, Phys. Rev. A52,
3711
(1995).
K m-asa, W. Cencek and J. Rychlewski, Phys Rev. A52,4500 (1995).
References
303
Fisher, I Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26, 855 (1993). Schrader, F- M. Jacobsen, N-P. Frandsen and U. Mikkelsen, Lett. 69, 57 (1992). Rev. Phys. G. G. Ryzhikh and J. TIVEtroy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4124 (1997). G- G. Rvzhikh, J. Mitroy and K. Varga, J- Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 3i, L265 (1998). W- Cencek and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 5878 (1996)W. Cencek, J. Komasa and J. Rychlewski, Chem. Phys. Letters 246,
109. C. Froese 110. D- M. 111. 112.
113. 114-
417(1995). 115. T.
Kato, Commun.
Pure and
Appl. Math. 107 151 (1957). Brown, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 556 (1966). D. P. Chong and D. Mi. Schrader, Mol. Phys. 16, 137 (1969). Y. Suzuki K. Varga and J. Usukura, Nucl. Phys. A631, 91c, (1998). L. I. Ponomarev, Atomic Phys. 10, 197 (1987). A. de Rujula, H. Georgi and S. L- Glashow, Phys. Rev. D1-2. 147 R. T. Pack-aud W. B.
116.
117. 118-
(1975). Isgur and G. Karl, PhyS. Rev. D18, D20, 1191 (1979).
119. N.
4187
(1978); D197
2653
(1979);
Close, An Introduction to Quarks and Partons (Academic Press, York, 1979). 121. V. B. Beretetskii, E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971). 122. B. Silvestre-Brac, Few-Body Sytems 20, 1 (1996); B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Gignoux, Phys- Rev. D32, 743 (1985). 123. L. Ya. Glozman, Z. Papp, W. Plessas, K. Varga and R. F- Wagenbrunn, Nucl. Phys- A623, 90c (1997); Phys. Rev. C57, 3406 (1998). 124- Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. D54, 1 (1996). 125. L. Ya. Glozman and D. 6. Riska, Phys. Rep. 268, 263 (1996). 126. L. Ya. Glozman, W. Plessas, K. Varga and R. F. Wagenbrunn, Phys. Rev. D58, 094030 (1998). 127. M. Oka and K. Yazaki, in Quarks and Nuclei, ed. W. W6ise (NN77orld Scientific, Singapore, 1984), p. 489. 128. Y. Fujiwara, C. Nakamoto and Y- Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C54, 2180 120. F. E. New
(1996). 129. J. R.
HkvneS, Phys. Rev- Lett. 17, 860 (1966)Brinkmann, T. Mi. Rice and B. Bells, Phys. Rev. B8,
130- W. F.
1570
(1973). 131. M- A.
Lee,
P. Vashishta and R. K.
Kalia, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 51, 2422
(1983). Kleinmann, Phys. Rev. B28. 871 (1983). Ainane, Superlatt. Microstuct. 5, 545 (1989). 134- A. Thilagam, Phys. Rev. B55 7804, (1997). 135. J. Singh, D. Birkedal, V. G. LySsenko and J. M. Hvam, Phys. Rev. B53, 15909 (1996). 136. M. A. Kastner, Phys. Today 46 No. 1, 24 (1993). 137. R. C- Ashoori, H. L. Stormer, J. S. Weiner, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin and K. W. West., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 613 (1993) 132. D. A.
133- B. Stebe and A.
-
References
304
Jacak, P. Hawrylak and A. W6js, Quantum Dots (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998). M. Taut, Phys. Rev. A48, 3561 (1993). P. A. Maksym, Physica B1-84, 385 (1993). M. Taut, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27,1045 (1994). The Quantum Hall Effect, ed. R. E. Prange and M. Girvin (SpringerVerlag, New York, 1987). R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983); see also [1421, p.
138. L. 139.
140. 141. 142. 143.
233.
Tjon, Nucl. Phys. A127, 161 (1969). Volkov, Phys. 74, 33 (1965). 1. R. Affian and Y. C. Tang, Phys. Rev. 175, 1337 (1968). D. R. Thompson, M. LeMere and Y. C. Tang, Nucl. Phys. A286, 53 (1977); 1. Reichstein and Y. C. Tang, Nucl. Phys. A158, 529 (1970). D. M. Brink and E. Boeker, Nucl. Phys. A91, 1 (1967). H. Kamada and W. G16ckle, Nucl. Phys. A548, 205 (1992). J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson and G. L. Payne, Phys. Rev. C24, 2279 (1981); C25, 2279 (1982). N. W. Schellingerhout and L. P. Kok, Nuel. Phys. A508, 299c (1990). A. Kievsky, M. Viviani and S. Rosati, Nucl. Phys. A501, 503 (1989); A551, 241 (1993); A577, 511 (1994). R. B. Wiringa, private communication. V. Efimov, Phys. Lett. B33, 563 (1970). W. GI,5ckle and H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 971 (1993) and private communication. In the case of RV8 potential, Coulomb energy of 0.75 MeV is added. For the alpha particle with RV8, the calculation includes maximum two-body angular momentum j,,,.,,, up to 3. B. S. Pudliner, V. R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4396 (1995). M. Viviani, A. Kievsky and S. Rosati, Few-Body Systems 18, 25 (1995) and private communication. J. Carlson, Nucl. Phys. A508, 141c (1990). W. G16ckle, H. Kamada, H. Witala, D. H-dber, J. Golak, K. Miyagawa and S. Ishikawa, Few-Body Systems, Suppl. 8, 9 (1995). C. R. Chen, G. L. Payne, J. L. Friar and B. F. Gibson, Phys. Rev. C31, 2266 (1985). A. Arriaga, V. R. Pandharipande and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C52,
144. R. A. Malfliet and I A.
145. A. B. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152.
153. 154. 155.
156.
157. 158. 159. 160. 161.
2362
162. R. B. 1207
164. J. 166. 167. 168.
(1995). Wiringa,
R. A. Smith and T. L.
Ainsworth, Phys.
Rev.
C29,
(1984).
Wiringa and V. R. Pandharipande, Nucl. Phys. A317, 1 (1979). Carlson, Phys. Rev. C36, 2026 (1987). J. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C38, 1879 (1988). K. Varga, Y. Suzuki and J. Usukura, Few-Body Systems 24, 81 (1998). R. F. Bishop, E. Buendfa, M. F. Flynn and R. Guadiola, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 1163 (1993). R. Guardiola, P. I. Moliner, J. Navaxro, R. F. Bishop, A. Puente and N. R. Walet, Nud. Phys. A609, 218 (1996).
163. R B.
165.
Nucl.
References 169. G.
Erens, J.
L. Visschers and R.
van
305
Wageningen, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
67, 461 (1971). 170. J. L. Friar, quoted in [42]. 171. R. H.
Dalitz, R. C. Herndon
and Y. C.
Tang,
Nucl.
Phys. B47,
109
(1972). 172. B. F. Gibson and E. V. Hungerford III, Phys. Rep. 257, 349 (1995). 173. H. Nemura, Y. Suzuki, Y. Fujiwara and C. Nakamoto, to be submitted.
Simon, Ch. Schmitt, Phys. A333, 381 (1980). M. McCord et al., Nuclear
174. G. G.
search
B56/57,
496
F. Borkowski and V. H.
Walther, Nucl.
Instruments and Methods in
Physcs
Re-
(1991).
Horiuchi, K. Ikeda, M. Kamimura, K. Kat6, Y. Suzuki Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 68, 29 (1980). B. Buck, H. Friedrich and C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys. A275, 246 (1977). S. Saito, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41, 705 (1969). V. L Kukulin and V. N. Pomenertsev, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 111, 330
175. Y. Fujiwara, H. and E. Uegaki, 176.
177. 178.
(1978). Rutgauzer, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 787 (1990). Tursunov, European Conference on Advances in Nuclear and Related Areas, Thesaloniki, Greece, 8-12 July, 1997, Abstracts, p. 194. F. Hoyle, D. N. F. Dunbar, W. A. Wenzel and W. Whaling, Phys. Rev.
179. D. V.
180. E. M. 181.
92, 1095 (1953).
Cook, W. A. Fowler, C. C. Lauritsen and T. Lauritsen, Phys. 107, 508 (1957). C. E. Rolfs and W. S. Rodney, Cauldrons in the Cosmos, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1988). S. Wolfram, Mathematica: A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer, 2nd Edition, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1991).
182. C. W.
Rev.
183. 184.
Index
6j Symbol
Racah coefficient
see
particle 233,240 9j Symbol 109-112,269,289
A
Addition theorem for harmonics
Chemical bond 169 Cluster model 131, 186,220,243, 246
spherical
Alpha-cluster 243 Antiprotonic helium
atom
Artificial atom
quantum dot
Associated
151
Laguerre polynomial
196,270 Asymptotic
Color
66
33,220 2,43,153,187,188
Atomic unit
Color-magnetic interaction 179 Complementary error function Constituent
Bargmann transform Bartlett force
97
-
-
force
see
-
178
Baryon Basis optimization Bessel. function
-
39
61
-
162, 187
Biexciton molecule
-
-
-
H
4He 5 He A 12
C
177
canonical Jacobi
19
center-of-mass
9, 112, 193 center 10, 18 heavy-particle interparticle-distance 14, 77 Jacobi 9,16,44,46,71,138,139, 174,223-224,265-269 relative 9, 16, 75-81, 112, 138, 257
162,172
-
single-particle
9, 15, 78, 112, 193
Correlated Gaussian
Binding 3
quark model
Coordinate
-
-
178
128 energy estimator
ATMS method
Biexciton
154,155
Charge permutation Chebyshev grid 41
99
see
Center-of-mass motion 9,112,138 Central force see force
energy 225-229
see
Gaussian
225-229
Correlated Gaussian-type geminal see Gaussian
240-242
Correlation factor
Bohr magneton
204
-
Born-Oppenheimer approximation 78,150,165,170 Breit interaction
see
coordinate Center-of-mass coordinate
Jastrow-type
211,230
159-160 Correlation function Cusp condition 70,76,167-168
Cyclotron frequency
179
Canonical Jacobi coordinate
coordinate
70, 75-76, 78,
230-233
242-246
see
Density-functional
196,205 27
Deterministic optimization Deterministic search 6 Dilation operator
35
41
Index
308
220,246 128, 133 Exchange operator
Efimov state
-
-
-
-
color space
-spin
Generator coordinate method
214
72-73,80,202 algorithm 41,56 Geometric progression 41,44-45, 48,99,220-221,224 Global vector 81,126,129,152, 174,229 Gradient formula 261,296
214,235 214,234 188
Excitonic
complex
-
Genetic
in three-dimension in two-dimension
Faddeev method
188-191 188-191
Grand
70,224-225
Faddeev-Yakubovsky
method
72,
220 Flavor Force -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8, 178
H2+
214,251 Heisenberg 214 Majorana 214 213
see
127,271
correlated
14,40,75,90, 112-114,126,266 in two-dimension
131
spherical
ill. condition in
Hill-Wheeler equation 72 HPs see hydrogen positride
Hydrogen positride 165 Hydrogen-antihydrogen like molecule
173
function
14,76,
Hyperangle 68 Hypernucleus 233-234,240 Hyperon 233 Hyperradius 67 Hyperspherical. harmonic(s) 67, Hypertriton
25
function
of correlated
233
72,87,123
of correlated Gaussian
geminal
center coordinate
coordinate
225
24,29,73
-
187
152
Gaussian wave-packet(s) 92,98 179 Gell-Man-n matrix Generalized eigenvalue problem
-
205
169
Hylleraas-type
129
77,131 126
Generating
68
Heisenberg force see force Hellmann-Feynman theorem 33-35,37,170,173 Hermite polynomial 128,145,281
214, 223 spin-orbit 215,254,276 tensor 81,215,251,274 Wigner 214
Gaussian
-
ratio
Heavy-particle
realistic
primitive
ion
Hartree
nucleon-nucleon
Gamma function
-
momentum
214
central
geminal.
angular
Green's function Monte Carlo method see Monte Carlo method
Gyromagnetic
213
Bartlett
--
72-73,93,
165,202
Exciton
-
wave-packets
Generator coordinate
180
isospin
relation to Gaussian 92
Error function
87-90
Gaussian-type
89
of harmonic-oscillator function
Integral kernel 73 Interparticle-distance coordinate see
coordinate
Isospin
8, 95, 213, 223
97 -
of two-dimensional correlated
Gaussian
Jacobi coordinate
see
130 Landau level
198,207
coordinate
Index
Legendre polynomial Linear independence
97,99 23-24,45,
-
Green's function
66,220,225
66
-quantum
variational 33,220 Multipole operator 237,256 Muonic molecule 151,174
47-48
-
Local energy 31, 62, 167 Local potential 8
Magnetic moment 205 Majorana force see force
Natural
Matrix element
Nodeless harmonic-oscillator
-
in correlated
geminals -
Gaussian-type
262
potential 273,280-283
251-253,
Nuclear magneton 205 Nucleon-nucleon potential
256,
283-285
249-250,
baryon 178 One-body density matrix 146 One-gluon exchange potential 177,178 angular 129,152,192
Orbital
overlap 247-249,271 for spin-orbit potential 254-255,277,293-294 for tensor potential 251-253,
Orthogonality
275
Partial-wave
for
partial-wave expansion 257-261,285 in generating functions 123, with
135-137
-
-
-
primitive Gaussians
131-134
in
spherical
Gaussians
126-128,
expansion 46,48,81, 223,229,233-237 Pauli principle 7,162,178,196, 214
-
at
quark level
15, 16, 90-93, 95, 126
potential
Positronic atom
Gaussians
Positronium.
134-137
spin 263-264,276,278 Metropolis algorithm 33 25
Minimization
-
-
negative ion 1, 43, 152,154,162 Powell's method 41,54-56,99 Ps-
32-33,61
PS2
Primitive Gaussian
98,270 Momentum
11
Aonte, Carlo method
65, 75
155
156
Positronium.
of variance of local energy Bessel function
hydrogen
116,154,
bound excited state of lifetime of
-
spherical
see
160,172
of energy expectation value
Modified
hydride
Positronium molecule
-
22-24,61
221
164
positride
-
Mini-Max theorem
244
Perinutatioi3
Poeschl-Teller
of semirelativistic kinetic energy 137-142
241-242
between nuclei
140-142 130
13,
condition model
in two-dimensional correlated
potential
momentum
244
-
in
of nonlocal
see
Octet
density multipole,
for kinetic energy 272
-
242
253,
256-257
-
76, 96,230 potential 134, 165,
force
for correlation function
-
220
function
Nonlocal
for central
86
parity
Neutron halo
in correlated Gaussians
for
309
see see
Pseudo
potential
Quantum
see
Gaussian
positronium. negative ion positroiiiiim molecule
dot
244
310
-
Index
in harmonic-oscillator
potential
192-209
-
magnetic field 196-209 magic number of 196,200-201 Quantum Monte Carlo method
-
-
in
-
-
-
see
Monte Carlo method
-
-
for excited states
2, 51, 143 53,228
refining sorting
50
trial and error search utility selection 55
Synthesis Racah coefficient
56-58
random trial
12
of
C
1, 51
246
107-112,234,
288
Tensor force
Random tempering 41,47,50 Realistic nucleon-nucleon potential see force Reduced matrix element
250,269,
Tensor
force
see
product
121,214,239,250
Transpose 9 Triplet-even state
Triplet-odd
215 215
state
275-279,288-290 Relative coordinate Ritz theorem
Roper
see
coordinate
Unnatural parity
181
resonance
Variance -
Scalar
214
product
Semirelativistic kinetic energy
Separable potential 134 Shell model 18, 202, 239, 244, Sherman-Morrison formula
Variation before 246
125,
143
Shifted Gaussian
annealing 41,56 Single-particle coordinate see coordinate
103
44,
266-270
Spin-orbit force see force Spurious state 244-245 Stability of hydrogen-like molecule 171,172 Stochastic diagonalization 60 optimization
41
Stochastic variational method -
-
admittance test
51
competitive selection
51
79
-
30
Weinstein's
30
Variational Monte Carlo method Monte Caxlo method
215
harmonic(s)
80
projection
30
Virial theorem
77,80,84,88,96-97,105 Spherical Gaussian see Gaussian Spherical harmonic(s) 45,83,96, 99-105,129 Spherical tensor operator 214 Spin function 94-95,115-117,223,
Stochastic
-upper
see
215
30,
Variational bound -lower 30
-Temple's
98
Simulated
Singlet-even state Singlet-odd state
61, 96
of energy expectation value 61
-of local energy 31 Variation after projection
137,181
Sobolev space Solid spherical
86
21,24,173
33-36,170,173
Weight function 72 Weinstein criterion 30 Wigner force see force
Wigner-Eckart 277,288
theorem
250,275,