Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 795-805 0112-1642/08/0010-0795/$48.00/0
CURRENT OPINION
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety The Intersection of Science and Policy in Sports Safety Toomas Timpka,1 Caroline F. Finch,2 Claude Goulet,3 Tim Noakes4 and Kaissar Yammine5 for the Safe Sports International Board 1 Department of Medicine and Health, Linko¨ping University, Linko¨ping, Sweden 2 School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia 3 Department of Physical Education, Laval University, Que´bec City, Que´bec, Canada 4 Sports Science Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa 5 Lebanese Association for Sports Injury Prevention and Antonine University, Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract
Sports and physical activity are transforming, and being transformed by, the societies in which they are practised. From the perspectives of both competitive and non-competitive sports, the complexity of their integration into today’s society has led to neither sports federations nor governments being able to manage the safety problem alone. In other words, these agencies, whilst promoting sport and physical activity, deliver policy and practices in an uncoordinated way that largely ignores the need for a concurrent overall policy for sports safety. This article reviews and analyses the possibility of developing an overall sports safety policy from a global viewpoint. Firstly, we describe the role of sports in today’s societies and the context within which much sport is delivered. We then discuss global issues related to injury prevention and safety in sports, with practical relevance to this important sector, including an analysis of critical policy issues necessary for the future development of the area and significant safety gains for all. We argue that there is a need to establish the sports injury problem as a critical component of general global health policy agendas, and to introduce sports safety as a mandatory component of all sustainable sports organizations. We conclude that the establishment of an explicit intersection between science and policy making is necessary for the future development of sports and the necessary safety gains required for all participants around the world. The Safe Sports International safety promotion programme is outlined as an example of an international organization active within this arena.
1. Sport in Contemporary Society Sports and physical activity are transforming, and being transformed by, the societies in which they are practised. Competitive sport has become the centre of a multinational industry producing
services and products with strong links to media networks. Globally, broadcasts of major sport events provide forms of entertainment in the media market and provide opportunities to display new consumer goods, ranging from sports equipment to a variety of products that are marketed to be
Timpka et al.
796
associated with a sporting and rewarding lifestyle, e.g. soft drinks, home electronics and cars. For instance, the televised 2007 US SuperBowl game was watched by more than 90 million viewers globally and attracted advertisers willing to spend $US2.5 million on each 30-second commercial. The downside of these advertising and media imperatives, which rely on the entertainment value of fierce sporting competition and the charisma of sporting stars, is that little attention is paid to the risk for ‘industrial diseases’ caused by both direct extreme physical loads and indirect consequences of economic exploitation among professional athletes. At the same time, public health agencies are actively promoting physical activity in adults, while physicians and educators are joining forces in bringing play, particularly physically challenging unstructured outdoor play, back into children’s daily lives.[1] Too often, however, these efforts neglect to ensure that the exercise is performed without unnecessary injury risk. For example, the facts that physical exercise programmes for the elderly may be associated with risks for falls, and that promotion of new activity opportunities for children and adolescents (such as home trampolines and skateboard parks) introduces new injury risks are often ignored. There seems to be a perception that if physical activity advocates were to talk about safety issues, people would not be active. In fact, the converse is true, as unsafe activity is one of the major barriers towards ongoing physical activity.[2] It seems clear that preventing injuries from occurring in the first place, and thereby delivering safe sport, should be a major positive physical activity promotion goal and incorporated into broad health promotion agendas. From the perspectives of both competitive and non-competitive sports, the complexity of their integration into today’s society has led to neither sports federations nor (local) governments being able to manage the safety problem alone. In other words, these agencies, whilst promoting sport and physical activity, deliver policy and practices in an incomplete way that largely ignores the need for a concurrent overall policy for sports safety. This article reviews and analyses the possibilities of developing overall policies for sports safety from a global viewpoint. Because this paper is more of a position paper than a critical review of the ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
literature, a systematic review was not undertaken. PubMed was employed to search the MEDLINE databases using the terms ‘sports injuries’, ‘sports injury prevention’, ‘sports safety’ and ‘sports policy’. From the basic set of abstracts of 6200 articles published since 1996, 350 articles were chosen as being potentially relevant to this the review. The reference lists of these articles were used to identify additional books and previously published materials relevant for the aim of the analysis. From this accumulated literature, only the articles of direct relevance to the positions and views presented in this review are referred to in this paper. The concluding analysis of the relevant texts was summarized in sections describing the social role of sports, global sports safety concerns, the structural underpinnings for promotion of sports safety, and the importance of the intersection between science and policy making in the formation of safe sport practices. Finally, the Safe Sports International (SSI) [www.safesportinternational.org] safety promotion programme, a new globally focused initiative to progress these issues, is outlined as an example of an international organization active in this intersection. 1.1 The Social Role of Sports: From Gameplay to Sports Industry
Even a cursory glance at the global news and media coverage would suggest that sport and physical activity have a more important position in social life today than ever before. Despite this attention, many modern public health concerns are associated with an increasingly sedentary lifestyle. For instance, in developed countries, the global obesity epidemic is reflected in a rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity and overweight, and their associated chronic medical conditions.[3] The irony of this is that this ‘epidemic’ has evolved in spite of long recognition of the beneficial role of participation in games and sports for physical, mental and social development[4] and the prevention of health problems.[5,6] One explanation for this paradox can be found in the growing gap between physical activity and competitive sport. With increasing competition, the amount of practice required forces children to choose between sports at an earlier age, and less competitive individuals may be altogether removed from sports development Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety
groups in adolescence.[7] These circumstances may well be leading to fewer young people participating in traditional sports, and those who do participate being expected to compete for positions as professional athletes at increasingly younger ages. Humankind has always played games based on physical challenges. Studies of traditional practices among Australian Aborigines and East African hunters suggest that these groups spent about one-quarter of their time finding and preparing food, and used the remaining time for different forms of play and music.[8] In Homo Ludens (Man the Player),[9] the Dutch anthropologist Johann Huizinga provided a comprehensive account of play in human culture. He recognized that when a person steps in or out of a game, he/she crosses a predetermined boundary that defines that game in time and space. To qualify as a game, participants should be able to cross this ‘boundary for play’ at their free will. Gameplay is thus circumscribed by a virtual or physical shield – Huizinga called this the ‘magic circle’ – which is a psychological boundary that stands between the participant and the ‘real world’.[10] In his further analysis, Huizinga linked the joyful and combative nature of play to education, art, religion and other essential elements of human culture and asserted that play ‘‘is a significant function’’ – that is to say, there is something ‘at play’ that transcends the immediate needs of life and imparts meaning to the action.[9] Today, the notion of a significant function of play has gained new, and differentiated, meanings adapted to the pre- and post-industrial societies. On the one hand, sports and physical activity is actively promoted by public health agencies and the maintenance of exercise habits with increasing age is encouraged. Progressively during the 20th century, however, sport as gameplay for fun and pleasure, has become accompanied by an emphasis on competitive athletics and professional sports. These latter physical activities are characterized by a spirit of dedication, sacrifice and intensity and with a prime aim of victory in the contest.[11] In only a few decades, professional sport has become an important international industry that not only involves sportspersons, coaches and administrators, but also media companies, equipment manufacturers, marketers and advertisers. For example, the television rights for the 2006 FIFA (Fe´de´ration Internationale de ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
797
Football Association) football World Cup were sold for $US6 billion, and sports sponsorship at a global level was estimated to be already worth approximately $US20 billion in 1999.[12] In 1999, the Council of Europe estimated that 3% of world trade concerned recreational and competitive sports, while the European Commission estimated that 2 million sports-related jobs had been created in the region between 1990 and 1999.[13] In other words, the roles of sports in today’s societies, and the contexts within which sports are delivered, are heterogeneous and not straightforward to overview or comprehend. Accordingly, the identification of global issues related to injury prevention and safety in sports requires careful examination, in particular if the analysis is to lead to the recognition of critical policy issues necessary for the future development of the area and significant safety gains for all.
2. Global Sports Safety Concerns Just as safety became a significant problem that had to be addressed in the factories during the rapid industrial revolution of the late 19th century, so too are we witnessing a similar need in today’s sports as they become more ‘industrialized’. Safety has been defined by the WHO as the ‘‘state in which hazards and conditions leading to physical, psychological, or material harm are controlled in order to preserve the health and well-being of individuals and the community.’’[14] Because sports and physical activity challenge human physical ability, it is likely they may always be associated with some element of risk of harm, at least to some participants. Nonetheless, most of the risks associated with sport participation, particularly for community level participants, can be minimized or controlled with the adoption of suitable prevention strategies.[15] In the international literature, injury is regarded as a limiting condition resulting from physical or mental harm to what is considered a normal human being. The assumptions of an average and static human body, however, do not have natural pertinence to all contexts. In high performance sporting activity, for example, human physical ability is challenged within the boundaries of rulegoverned practices and games and is highly competitive. Accordingly, sports injuries are defined in Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
798
terms of how they adversely influence an athlete’s ability to excel in performance according to the rules of the game or whether they exclude an athlete from further participation in that activity.[16] Founded on this relative framework, sports injury is often defined in terms of ‘time lost’ from participation.[17-19] Even though such a definition may be sound with regard to the nature of competitive sports, it does not take into account the broader context of sport and physical activity in today’s societies, which encompasses a set of significantly different and dynamically changing activities, and which may or may not include an element of competition. Some professional and competitive sports have become burdened with their own injuries to such an extent that they now represent forms of ‘industrial diseases.’[20] Overall injury rates are higher in sports entailing more frequent and powerful body contact, particularly because of collisions. Studies in English professional football, for instance, have shown that the risk for injury among players is about 1000 times the risk in other occupations normally considered as high risk, such as mining or construction.[21] Each sport has its own characteristic injury profile. Even though catastrophic injuries are relatively rare, pole vaulting, gymnastics, ice hockey and American football are examples of sports with a high incidence of acute severe injuries.[22] Lower limb injuries are generally the most common in sports involving large amounts of running, jumping, landing and changing direction.[23] The development of osteoarthritis and other adverse health outcomes secondary to sports injury is also a particularly important concern because of its association with poorer health-related quality of life and reduced participation in physical activity after retirement from sport.[2,24] There is now irrefutable evidence that the sports injury problem is not restricted to professional sports. Economic evaluations in general populations have suggested that participation in community sports by 20- to 45-year-olds leads to more costs through injuries than benefits through positive health effects,[25] even though other studies have showed less conclusive results.[26] For more than two decades, about every fifth unintentional injury treated in a healthcare setting in industrialized countries has been associated with sports
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Timpka et al.
or physical activity.[27] In 2006, 31 in every 1000 adult Germans sustained a sports injury during the previous year;[28] the corresponding rate is 88 injured people per 1000 sports participants in the Canadian province of Que´bec.[29] In the US, an estimated 7 million people receive medical attention for sports injuries each year, corresponding to 26 injury episodes per 1000 persons.[30] Australia has recently reported 37 cases of medically treated sports injuries per 1000 active persons, with many injuries associated with adverse public health impacts.[31] Traditional sports safety approaches have been based on those for the prevention of general physical injury. However, a key point of the WHO definition of safety is that it has two dimensions: physical safety factors and an individual’s internal feelings of being safe.[14] This widening of the safety concept from merely the control of physical injury[32] is particularly pertinent for sports and physical activity. For instance, although sexual harassment and abuse have been recognized problems in the workplace for more than three decades, the prevalence of sexual exploitation in sports and the consequences for survivors have only recently started to emerge.[33] A particular set of safety issues concerns children involved in competitive athletics. Young athletes have been reported to be at increased risk for specific types of acute physical harm, e.g. growth plate and apophyseal injuries and heat illness.[34] Furthermore, their growing bodies are particularly susceptible to overuse injuries, e.g. little leaguer’s shoulder, spondylolisthesis, Osgood-Schlatter disease and Sever’s disease.[35] Child athletes must be guided by gradual skills development, adapted for their psychological maturity, to ensure that the sport environment is a wholesome and emotionally rewarding experience for all levels of participation and competition.[36] A focus on highly competitive sport has meant that since the 1970s, intensive training programmes have been provided to young people in sports such as gymnastics, figure skating, diving, football, ice hockey and tennis. In gymnastics, the average age for the best athletes has dropped from 25 years in 1965 to about 17 years at present.[37] Today, governments and professional clubs organize development programmes specifically directed at young athletes in sports academies and specialized athletic centres. The selection of
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety
talented children to the programmes’ later stages is mainly based on their achievements in competitions, exposing them to increased risks of extensive physical and mental stress.[38] Despite the fact that many youth sports programmes are well balanced and integrated with schooling, the economic exploitation of child athletes has been compared to child labour.[39] Given the personal and family sacrifices that are needed to attain competitive results, it is doubtful whether involvement of young children in some programmes could be described as gameplay. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) minimum age convention,[40] ratified by 146 nations over the world, prohibits work for children under the age of 15 years, but allows ‘light work’ for children aged ‡13 years. It may be possible to compare a Canadian or Swedish ice hockey player, aged 14 years, who skates for a hockey club for more than 3 hours, 6 days a week to a child of the same age working on a farm in the developing world. However, in no country has the labour legislation has been specific enough to address the situation of young athletes.[41] The United Nations (UN) convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted in 1989 and ratified by all nations except Somalia and the US, remains the most powerful regulation available to judge whether competitive sports are compatible with ‘the best interest of the child’.[41] This convention regulates children’s rights in relation to not only employers, but also parents, other adults, schools and healthcare delivery settings. Despite the fact that the convention has been in place for almost two decades, there are very few institutional programmes implemented for the surveillance of potential abuse of child athletes and taking action on child protection in sports (for an exception, see Sport England and the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children [NSPCC]).[42] Another area related to child sports safety is the dislocation of young people with sports talent from their family and friends. The shipping of young sportspersons between the developing world and professional clubs in Europe and the US has grown extensively during the last decade and has been described as ‘sports trafficking’.[43] For example, it is estimated that about 500–700 young baseball players are sent to the US from Latin America every year.[44] The number of young ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
799
football players travelling from Africa and South America to Europe is not known; in the late 1990s, it was estimated that about 400 young players left Uruguay to play in Europe.[45] Sports trafficking has only recently been brought to public attention, and reliable data to quantify this problem are largely lacking. 2.1 The Promotion of Sports Safety
The rapid development of sport and the global sports industry has occurred without concurrent development of safety initiatives. This means that the present safety-supporting environments for sport are largely under-developed or misplaced in comparison with aspects of societal duty of care. At the international policy level, in 2004 the UN issued the strongest statement available today on sports safety. In resolution 58/5,[46] it is acknowledged that the hazards associated with sports span much more than just physical injury. Threats to the health and well-being of young athletes were stated to be related to ‘‘child labor, violence, doping, early specialisation, over-training and exploitative forms of commercialisation, as well as less visible threats and deprivations, such as premature severance of family bonds and the loss of sporting, social and cultural ties.’’ Even though the international sports federations recognize these issues, few, if any, have the resources or the mandate to manage them on their own. Lessons learnt from coping with emerging safety issues during the industrial revolution suggest that the management and promotion of sports safety will require multi-professional skills and concerted efforts from many different agencies. Such efforts will need to be implemented in ‘glocalized’ communities, i.e. at local, national and international levels, along with joint efforts from individuals, companies, governments and other local agencies.[47] Importantly, in the sporting context, these must include the national and international federations, as well as professional and amateur sports clubs.[48] If sports safety is to repeat the success stories of safety improvements in factories and on roads, it must be prepared to modify physical, social, technological, political, and organizational structures and environments, as well as the perceptions and behaviours or organizations and individuals. Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Timpka et al.
800
Advancing sports safety at the global level will require evidence-informed management and action by sports federations and clubs, on the one hand, and the authorities responsible for sports facilities and legislations in the civil society on the other. Such evidence-based sports safety promotion demands close involvement with researchers (to provide the evidence) and practitioners (to adopt the scientific knowledge into practice), which in turn requires a new methodological framework for sports safety research. The Translating Research into Injury Prevention Practice (TRIPP) model[49] builds on the fact that only research that is adopted by sports participants, their coaches and sporting bodies will prevent injuries. Importantly, advances in sports safety will only be achieved if research efforts are directed towards understanding the implementation context for injury prevention, as well as continuing to build the evidence base for their efficacy and effectiveness of interventions. An example of the development of an intervention that has followed these principals is the protective eyewear promotion for squash players in Australia.[50]
3. Science and Policies for Safe Sports As early as 1976, it was noted that ‘‘we place an undue emphasis on the gifted athletes 15 to 22, a preposterous emphasis on a few professionals aged 23 to 35, and never enough on the mass of our population.’’[51] Other observers have pointed out that the strong financial support directed towards elite sports can only have a significant negative impact on how sports are socially perceived and structured, over and above allowing the wealthiest teams to win.[52] For example, many communities invest in facilities for competitive sports, even if the investments simultaneously force them to cut resources in other areas for public spending.[53] The fiercest critics assert that increased commercialization will lead to violation of traditionally highly valued aspects of sport, e.g. downplay of enjoyment, disregard of fair play, and neglect of increasing violence.[54] Regardless of whether these critics are right or not, the demands that individuals, organizations and societies place on human physical and mental capabilities in different sporting contexts modify how injury risk is identified, accepted and managed. It is therefore imperative that injury ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
prevention and safety promotion in sport is adapted to the specific social construct of sporting practice and the culture of its delivery. For instance, the Lebanese Association for Sports Injury Prevention has developed a safe sport policy suitable for Lebanon and the Middle East countries in terms of sports regulations, and legislation proposals based on the specific conditions in the region.[55] The context-dependence of the injury problem implies that there is a significant role for sports scientists to play if social and ecological fallacy is to be avoided when addressing safety issues in sports policy making. Traditionally focused sports injury prevention research has contributed to the building of an evidence base about the magnitude of the injury problem, identification of risk factors and efficacy of interventions.[56,57] Unfortunately, such approaches only indirectly impact on policy change, and from a global prevention perspective, contributions from traditional scientific knowledge may be insufficient.[48,49] Jackson et al.[58] argue that more research is needed into how to strengthen and garner community action before our health challenges can be effectively addressed. The management of the sports injury problem will require a constant intermingling between scientific findings, contextual factors and values in both the scientific and the policy processes. Very few would argue that science and policy making are separate entities in today’s societies.[59] Sports science and sports policy are not only intersecting, but also co-evolving social domains. As an example, the development and implementation of sports safety policies is significantly influenced by differences between the distribution of the intervention costs and the corresponding distribution of benefits among groups of sports participants or communities. Sports injury researchers should contribute to the balancing of this decision process by conducting cost-effectiveness studies. This is an area where little work has been done, but the example from Que´bec of face guards for ice-hockey players shows the power of this information. After 1 year of enforcement among adult recreational players, the full face protector use rate increased from 25% to 88%. It was estimated that the regulation resulted in a net saving of $Can1.9 million in healthcare costs alone, and a savings-cost ratio for the regulation of 1.87 : 1.[60] Having said this, it also has to be acknowledged that concentrated Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety
801
interests still often outweigh the interests of larger populations in policy making, particularly in the absence of cost-effectiveness information. Government and organizational decision makers expect criticism for decisions that impose costs rather than expecting recognition for providing new benefits.[61] As a result, the most politically feasible environment for policy change is one of ‘client politics’, which offers visible benefits for a specific group while imposing diffuse costs and few disadvantages among other groups. In other words, the institutional environment predisposes for a bias among policy makers towards providing beneficial policy to organizations and population subgroups that both have a powerful societal voice and are, in the public opinion, regarded as ‘deserving’. In the sports safety context, researchers can contribute to decreasing this bias by evaluating sports safety policies with regard to outcomes among less resourceful groups and, in the global setting, in developing countries. For instance, building on experiences from other health policy areas,[62] influence from the media coverage of certain sports and sportspersons can neutralize scientific knowledge in decisions regarding safety policies. The issue is that sports journalists often glorify injuries, with major sports stars ‘battling on’, injury making them even bigger
heroes. The message given is that it is ‘alright to play with injury if you are going to win’[63] and ‘hero’ status is often afforded to athletes who do so. This message, however, tells parents and other significant stakeholders that sport is an inherently high-risk activity, and this may lead to parents actively preventing their children from playing certain sports.[64] In such situations, based on their experiences as media consumers, not only may those targeted by sports safety programmes respond negatively to the interventions themselves, but also the general public may regard them as ‘not deserving’.[65] This element of injury glorification in the dramaturgy of sports journalism is an example of influence on sports policy that can be counteracted by properly targeted sports safety research. If an intersection between sports science and sports policy can be established, a series of practical and theoretical issues associated with sports safety, such as the media reports of injuries, can be addressed by exchange of ideas and knowledge. To be able to manage such a shared arena, the basic processes in the intersection need to be made explicit. These processes can be defined as social courses of action that encompass relations between scientists and actors involved in sports policy making, and that allow for dialogue, co-evolution and joint improvement of policy making (table I).
Table I. Intersection between science and policy in the area of sports safety (adapted from van den Hove,[66] with permission from Elsevier. Copyright ª 2007) Manifestations of sports safety science
Examples of intersection with policy in sports
Outputs
Definitions of objective knowledge Integration of scientific knowledge in sports safety policy making (explanations, predictions) Sports safety research contributes to emergence of novel issues on sports policy agenda, and establishes safety during physical exercise at the health promotion agenda
Processes Defining and describing a sports safety problem, and designing potential solutions
Coordination between scientific and policy process
Organization and funding of research
Sports research policy is driven by political considerations, with appropriate funding and infrastructure support Results of sports safety research influence prioritisation in sports policy
Quality and validation processes
Requirement of scientific validation in sports policy processes
Education and training processes
Policy influence on orientation of education and training Influence of education and training on role of science in policy
Networking processes
Channelling scientific sports safety knowledge to policy makers and practitioners
Sports safety scientists
Scientific experts participating in policy processes Scientific experts influencing policy by reporting their values and interests
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Timpka et al.
802
3.1 Safe Sports International
International sports safety programmes are yet to critically evaluate sports safety policies and injury prevention programmes with regard to outcomes for a broad range of client groups, covering the spectrum of those who are socially disadvantaged to those from wealthy Western countries. At the global level, it is particularly important that the estimated and factual effects of institutional sports safety interventions in the third world country context be considered. SSI is an impartial non-profit programme for global promotion of sports safety that was established in 2006. It originates from the Safe Communities movement,[67] but is autonomous with regard to its policy and scope. An important underpinning for the operation of the SSI programme is the sports safety experience from Que´bec, Canada. In 1979, to significantly contribute to the establishment of safe environments, the government of Que´bec adopted the Act Respecting Safety in Sports, which created the Que´bec Sports Safety Board (QSSB).[68] The QSSB has not been in operation since 1998, but the Act is still in place. The Que´bec Ministry of Education, Leisure, and Sport is responsible for its application. The SSI management group includes representatives from all continents to ensure its global relevance. SSI has nine operational objectives covering general principles, scientific needs and policy goals. These are outlined in table II, table III and table IV. Through addressing these objectives, the ultimate goal of SSI is to establish a sports safety colloquium shared by sportspersons, sports scientists, sports officials, and agencies that are responsible for implementing and administering policies at national and international levels. Table II. General objectives of Safe Sport International (SSI) To bring community sports back into health, promoting the ‘magic circle of gameplay’, while also accommodating the pursuit of excellence by developing a scientifically informed international platform that brings together socially and geographically defined communities having an interest in increasing sports safety To advance the level of ‘industrial safety’ in professional sports by distribution of information and empowerment of athletes, and supporting sports federations and other agencies with responsibility for the establishment of safe sports environments To recognize and act on the synergies between global health promotion efforts and safety promotion
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Table III. Policy objectives of Safe Sport International (SSI) To advocate and promote international efforts in sports injury prevention research that significantly contribute to the evidence base for the effectiveness and efficacy of all sports safety prevention measures To care for the rights of child athletes to remain children (United Nations convention on the Rights of the Child, ILO C138) To assist developing countries in sports injury initiatives by disseminating information about the evidence base on sports safety and by establishing international networks To advocate national and international policy, and to guide governmental and sports body formal responses to the sports injury problem
A central tenet of SSI is that young sportspersons have the right to health and well-being, to be achieved by a balance of sports industry needs, safety-orientated scientific knowledge and evidence-based actions. The aim of the programme is 2-fold: to establish the sports injury problem firmly on the global health policy agenda, and to introduce sports safety as a mandatory component in the establishment of sustainable sports organizations. The programme is founded on a solid base of sports injury epidemiology and proceeds by accepting that the interaction between science and politics plays a critical role in health affairs, and that sports safety should not excluded from this interplay. It is recognized that in addition to scientific evidence, public perceptions regarding the severity and solvability of the sports safety problem, responsibility issues and the social position of affected populations all influence organizational and governmental responses.[69] The SSI programme aims to collate scientific evidence for identifying when large-scale transformation of sports safety policy can and should be implemented, thus dynamically highlighting the actual critical processes in the safety policy development. The programme also addresses how fragmented agencies, resistant commercial interests and other economic constraints can lead policy makers in sports to adopt a ‘minimal change’ strategy in safety policy rather than making comprehensive reforms when faced with urgent problems. SSI is adopting a working method that supports the formation of partnerships between sports safety researchers and socially defined sports-specific communities, addressing locally identified problems. In parallel, through co-operation with general safety promotion and injury prevention
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety
Table IV. Scientific objectives of Safe Sport International (SSI) To recognize that there are particular implementation challenges in the sports injury context that justify the employment of a contextspecific framework for the transfer of research results to practice settings and to develop innovative methodologies to allow this to occur To work towards the standardization of concepts and definitions such as sports injury and sports safety, as these are critical for adding to the research evidence base, the evaluation of implemented safety programmes and the monitoring of both spatial and temporal trends in injury rates To advocate and support, where appropriate, the formal evaluation of sports safety programmes, particularly those implemented in community settings
programmes, SSI mediates alliances with geographically defined communities in efforts to develop safe local environments for physical activities. The programme uses electronic media and the Internet strategically to reach its goals, as these have previously been successful as community mobilization strategies in health promotion.[70] In doing so, it takes advantage of recent advances in technical designs for computer networks for the supporting of broad health promotion programmes.[71] The formation of SSI is a direct response to the need to establish the sports injury problem as a critical component of general global health policy agendas, and to introduce sports safety as a mandatory component of all sustainable sports organizations. It is thereby recognized that the establishment of an explicit intersection between science and policy making is necessary for the future development of all sports and the necessary safety gains required for participants around the world. Accordingly, the SSI safety promotion programme is organized particularly to be active in this intersection.
4. Conclusion Although incremental responses to sports safety problems are starting to become established in many settings, particularly in the more wealthy Westernized countries, they are likely to remain restricted to local issues or to particular groups of athletes. At the community level, erroneous public beliefs that ‘sports injury is inevitable’ can lead to sports safety issues being downgraded in importance in favour of other health problems that are perceived to be more important or preventable. In the commercial sports industry setting, scientific ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
803
evidence can become outweighed by industry opposition and economic arguments. In recent years, there has been a growing activity around the topic of science-policy interfaces.[72] A key reason behind the emergence of this concept is that it captures a series of practical experiences and needs, and reflects theoretical and methodological interrogations. Organizations such as SSI can contribute to overcoming the inertia against the adoption of radical and comprehensive safety policies in sports by networking, empowerment of deprived groups, and impartial analyses of scientific evidence and accumulating information about the key components of partnerships for health promotion gains. Scientific evidence is the central asset in this process, as it can be applied to both particular safety policy processes (e.g. the use of protective equipments in specific sports) and general issues at a global scale (e.g. concerning children’s rights in the professional sports context). However, the mere availability of evidence is not enough for policy change to take place. A series of methodological issues in the interface between science and policy in sports safety still need to be solved before the interaction can become efficient. These problems include improvement of the interface transparency – in particular with regard to sportspersons and the public, translation of scientific knowledge into policy-relevant knowledge (and of policy statements into scientific evaluation questions), the development of dissemination channels for scientific knowledge to the various potential user groups, and the establishment of science-policy interfaces in a democratic context. In summary, opening windows of opportunity for sports safety policy change will require significant shifts in the public perception of the injury problem and in the distribution of control of the strategic power within sport.[73] This will only be achieved when there is a convergence of problem understanding among scientists and policy makers. The strategy for global sports safety organizations, such as SSI, must therefore be defined with regard to opportunities for accommodating and balancing scientifically validated policy alternatives against the priorities of political leaders, international sports organizations, commercial interests and the public opinion. Given the complex integration of sport in today’s societies, a viable constituency for sports safety can only be mobilized, and sustainable Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Timpka et al.
804
policy innovations reached within reasonable periods, if a stable global infrastructure for negotiating such convergences can be established.
16.
Acknowledgements 17.
The Board of Safe Sports International also includes Professor JoonPil Cho, Ajou University, South Korea (representing Asia), and Professor Leif Svanstro¨m, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden (representing the Safe Communities movement). T. Timpka is supported by a research grant from Linko¨ping University, and C. Finch is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Researcher Fellowship from the Government of Australia. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
18.
19. 20.
21.
References 1. Burdette HL, Whitaker RC. Resurrecting free play in young children: looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation, and affect. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005 Jan; 159 (1): 46-50 2. Finch C, Owen N, Price R. Current injury or disability as a barrier to being more physically active. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (5): 778-82 3. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005 4. Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Dev 1998; 69: 577-98 5. Alpert BS, Wilmore JH. Physical activity and blood pressure in adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1994; 6: 381-405 6. Fox KR. Childhood obesity and the role of physical activity. J Royal Soc Health 2003; 124: 34-9 7. Murphy S. The cheers and the tears: a healthy alternative to the dark side of youth sports today. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999 8. Sahlins M. Stone age economics. Chicago (IL): AldineAtherton, 1972 9. Huizinga J. Homo Ludens: a study of the play element in culture. Boston (MA): Beacon Press, 1950 10. Apter MJ. A structural-phenomenology of play. In: Kerr JH, Apter MJ, editors. Adult play: a reversal theory approach. Amsterdam: Swets and Zietlinger, 1991: 15 11. Keating JW. Sportsmanship as a moral category. In: Morgan WJ, Meier KV, editors. Philosophic inquiry in sports. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Press, 1995: 144-51 12. Gratton C, Taylor P. Economics of sport and recreation. London: E and FN Spon, 2000 13. European Commission. The European model of sport: consultation document of DG X. Brussels: European Commission, 1999 14. WHO. Safety and safety promotion: conceptual and operational aspects. Que´bec (QC): WHO, 1998 15. Finch C, McGrath A. SportSafe Australia: a national sports safety framework. A report prepared for the Australian
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
22. 23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. 33.
34.
Sports Injury Prevention Taskforce. Canberra (ACT): Australian Sports Commission, 1997 Lurie Y. The ontology of sports injuries and professional medical ethics. In: Loland S, Skirstad B, Waddinton I, editors. Pain and injury in sport. London: Routledge, 2006: 200-10 Orchard W, Newman D, Stretch R, et al. Methods for injury surveillance in international cricket. Br J Sports Med Apr 2005; 39: e22 Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med 2006 Mar; 40 (3): 193-201 Finch C. An overview of some definitional issues for sports injury surveillance. Sports Med 1997; 24 (3): 157-63 Roderick M, Waddington I, Parker G. Playing hurt: managing injuries in English professional football. Int Rev Sociology Sport 2000; 35: 165-80 Hawkins RD, Fuller CW. A prospective epidemiological study of injuries in four English professional football clubs. Br J Sports Med 1999 Jun; 33 (3): 196-203 Boden BP. Direct catastrophic injury in sports. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005 Nov; 13 (7): 445-54 Robinson P, White LM. The biomechanics and imaging of soccer injuries. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005 Dec; 9 (4): 397-420 Turner AP, Barlow JH, Heathcote-Elliott C. Long term health impact of playing professional football in the United Kingdom. Br J Sports Med 2000 Oct; 34 (5): 332-6 Nicholl JP, Coleman P, Brazier JE. Health and healthcare costs and benefits of exercise. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 5: 109-22 Hagberg LA, Lindholm L. Cost-effectiveness of healthcarebased interventions aimed at improving physical activity. Scand J Public Health 2006; 34 (6): 641-53 Lindqvist KS, Timpka T, Bjurulf P. Injuries during leisure physical activity in a Swedish municipality. Scand J Soc Med 1996 Dec; 24 (4): 282-92 Schneider S, Seither B, Tonges S, et al. Sports injuries: population based representative data on incidence, diagnosis, sequelae, and high risk groups. Br J Sports Med 2006 Apr; 40 (4): 334-9 Goulet C, Hamel D. A population-based study on sport and recreational activity injuries in Que´bec in 2004 [abstract]. Safety 2006: 8th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion; 2006 Apr 2-5; Durban Conn JM, Annest JL, Gilchrist J. Sports and recreation related injury episodes in the US population, 1997-99. Inj Prev 2003 Jun; 9 (2): 117-23 Finch C, Cassell E. The public health impact of injury during sport and active recreation. J Sci Med Sport 2006 Dec; 9 (6): 490-7 Nilsen P, Hudson DS, Kullberg A, et al. Making sense of safety. Inj Prev 2004 Apr; 10 (2): 71-3 Bringer JD, Brackenridge CH, Johnston LH. The name of the game: a review of sexual exploitation of females in sport. Curr Womens Health Rep 2001 Dec; 1 (3): 225-31 Demorest RA, Landry GL. Prevention of pediatric sports injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep 2003 Dec; 2 (6): 337-43
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Meeting the Global Demand of Sports Safety
35. Cassas KJ, Cassettari-Wayhs A. Childhood and adolescent sports-related overuse injuries. Am Fam Physician 2006 Mar 15; 73 (6): 1014-22 36. Dollard MD, Pontell D, Hallivis R. Preconditioning principles for preventing sports injuries in adolescents and children. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2006 Jan; 23 (1): 191-207 37. Leglise M. The protection of young people involved in highlevel sport. Strasbourg: Committee for the Development of Sports, Council of Europe, 1997 38. Ryan J. Little girls in pretty boxes: the making of and breaking of elite gymnasts and figure skaters. New York: Doubleday, 1995 39. Donnely P. Child labour, sport labour: applying child labour laws to sport. Int Rev Sociology Sport 1997; 32: 389-406 40. International Labour Organisation (ILO). C138 Minimum Age Convention, 1973 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/convdisp1.htm [Accessed 2008 Jul 25] 41. David P. Human rights in youth sports. A critical review of children’s rights in competitive sports. New York: Routledge, 2004 42. Sport England, NSPCC. Strategy for safeguarding children and young people in sport [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.sportengland.org/child__protection__cpsu_strat_2006_ to2012_pdf.pdf [Accessed 2008 25 Jul] 43. Regalado SO. Latin players on the cheap: professional baseball recruitment in Latin America and the neo-colonist tradition. Indiana J Global Legal Stud 2000; 8: 9-20 44. Breton M, Villegas JL. Away games: the life and time of Latin ball. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press, 1999 45. Guilianotti R. Built in by the two Valeras: the rise and fall of football culture and national identity in Uruguay. Cult Sport Soc 1999; 2: 134-54 46. United Nations. General Assembly. Resolution 58/5. Sports as a means to promote education, health, development, and peace. New York: United Nations, 2003 47. Guilianotti R, Robertson R. The globalization of football: a study in the glocalization of the ‘serious life’. Br J Sociology 2004; 55: 545-68 48. Timpka T, Ekstrand J, Svanstrom L. From sports injury prevention to safety promotion in sports. Sports Med 2006; 36 (9): 733-45 49. Finch C. A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9 (1-2): 3-9 50. Eime R, Owen N, Finch C. Protective eyewear promotion: applying principles of behaviour change in the design of a squash injury prevention programme. Sports Med 2004; 34 (10): 629-38 51. Michener JA. Sports in America. New York: Random House, 1976 52. Dunning E. The dynamics of sports consumption. In: Sport matters: sociological studies of sport, violence, and civilization. London: Routledge, 1999: 106-29 53. Manzenreiter W, Horne J. Public policy, sports investments, and regional development initiatives in Japan. In: Nauright J, Schimmel KS, editors. The political economy of sports. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005: 152-82
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
805
54. Walsh AJ, Guilianotti R. This sporting mammon: a normative critique of the commodification of sport. J Philosophy Sport 2001; 28: 53-77 55. Yammine K. A policy for sports injury prevention in Lebanon [abstract]. Safety 2006: 8th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion; 2006 Apr 2-5; Durban 56. Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 324-9 57. van Mechelen W. To count or not to count sports injuries? What is the question? Br J Sports Med 1998; 32: 297-8 58. Jackson S, Perkins F, Khandor E, et al. Integrated health promotion strategies: a contribution to tackling current and future heath challenges. Health Promot Int 2006; 21 Suppl. 1: 75-83 59. Allison L. Sport and Politics. In: Allison L, editor. The politics of sport. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1986: 17-21 60. Re´gnier G, Sicard C, Goulet C. Economic impact of a regulation imposing full-face protectors on adult recreational hockey players. Int J Consumer Safety 1995; 2: 191-207 61. Oliver TR, Paul-Shaheen P. Translating ideas into actions: entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms. Health Polit Policy Law 1997; 22: 721-88 62. Morone JA. Enemies of the people: the moral dimensions to public health. Health Polit Policy Law 1997; 22: 993-1020 63. Young K. Violence, risk and liability in male sports culture. Sociology Sports J 1993; 10: 373-96 64. Boufous S, Finch C, Bauman A. Parental safety concerns: a barrier to sport and physical activity in children? Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28 (5): 482-6 65. Schneider A, Ingram H. Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 1993; 87: 334-47 66. Van den Hove S. A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures 2007; 39: 807-26 67. Timpka T, Lindqvist K. Evidence based prevention of acute injuries during physical exercise in a WHO safe community. Br J Sports Med 2001 Feb; 35 (1): 20-7 68. Regnier G, Goulet C. The Quebec Sports Safety Board: a governmental agency dedicated to the prevention of sports and recreational injuries. Inj Prev 1995 Sep; 1 (3): 141-5 69. Oliver TR. The politics of public health policy. Annu Rev Public Health 2006; 27: 195-233 70. Grierson T, van Dijk MW, Dozois E, et al. Using the Internet to build community capacity for healthy public policy. Health Promot Pract 2006 Jan; 7 (1): 13-22 71. Irestig M, Hallberg N, Eriksson H, et al. Peer-to-peer computing in health-promoting voluntary organizations: a system design analysis. J Med Syst 2005 Oct; 29 (5): 425-40 72. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993; 25 (7): 735-55 73. Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston (MA): Little & Brown, 1984
Correspondence: Prof. Toomas Timpka, Section of Social Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Linko¨ping University, SE-581 83 Linko¨ping, Sweden. E-mail:
[email protected] Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 807-824 0112-1642/08/0010-0807/$48.00/0
CURRENT OPINION
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Physical Activity and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Jason M.R. Gill1 and Ashley R. Cooper2 1 Institute of Diet, Exercise and Lifestyle (IDEAL), Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK 2 Department of Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Abstract
The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing at a rapid rate, predominantly because of changes in environmental factors interacting with individual genetic susceptibility to the disease. Data from 20 longitudinal cohort studies present a consistent picture indicating that regular physical activity substantially reduces risk of type 2 diabetes. Adjustment for differences in body mass index between active and inactive groups attenuates the magnitude of risk reduction, but even after adjustment, a high level of physical activity is associated with a 20–30% reduction in diabetes risk. The data indicate that protection from diabetes can be conferred by a range of activities of moderate or vigorous intensity, and that regular light-intensity activity may also be sufficient, although the data for this are less consistent. The risk reduction associated with increased physical activity appears to be greatest in those at increased baseline risk of the disease, such as the obese, those with a positive family history and those with impaired glucose regulation. Data from six large-scale diabetes prevention intervention trials in adults with impaired glucose tolerance or at high risk of cardiovascular disease indicate that increasing moderate physical activity by approximately 150 minutes per week reduces risk of progression to diabetes, with this effect being greater if accompanied by weight loss. However, this level of activity did not prevent all diabetes, with 2–13% of participants per annum who underwent lifestyle intervention still developing the disease. Thus, while 150 minutes per week of moderate activity confers benefits, higher levels of activity may be necessary to maximize diabetes risk reduction in those at high baseline risk of the disease. In contrast, those at low baseline risk of type 2 diabetes, e.g. people with a very low body mass index and no family history of diabetes, will remain at low risk of developing diabetes whether they are active or not. Thus, the amount of physical activity required to confer low risk of diabetes differs according to an individual’s level of baseline risk. Consequently, a ‘one size fits all’ mass-population strategy may not provide the most appropriate approach when designing physical activity guidelines for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Producing tailored guidelines with the specific aim of reducing risk of diabetes in high-risk populations may provide an alternative approach.
808
It is estimated that 171 million people in the world currently have diabetes mellitus, and this number is expected to increase to 366 million by the year 2030,[1] with the majority of these cases being type 2 diabetes. This growing epidemic of type 2 diabetes is thought to be predominantly due to lifestyle factors, characterized by diminished physical activity, increased energy and fat intake, and increased obesity, interacting with genetic susceptibility, although the relative importance of each of these factors is unclear. Obesity is the most important independent modifiable predictor of type 2 diabetes. In prospective studies of predominantly White American adults, men and women with body mass indices (BMIs) of ‡35 kg/m2 had 42- and 93-fold increased risks of developing diabetes, compared with men with BMI 4 times/wk]; responses combined as a physical activity index (low/medium/high)
Daily EE in 20 selected activities (4 h/wk]/high [vigorous activity >3 h/wk]); occupational physical activity (OPA) [light/moderate/active]; commuting (motorized/walking or cycling 4 times/wk were also associated with lower diabetes risk (RR = 0.73 [0.62, 0.85] and 0.64 [0.41, 1.01], respectively compared with rare or never. In 26 124 women who reported no vigorous activity, moderate activity was still associated negatively with diabetes. Physical activity index was associated negatively and strongly with diabetes incidence (RR = 0.79 [0.70, 0.90]. Association was similar across three strata of BMI
Increasing daily EE was significantly associated with reduced risk of diabetes (RR = 0.40 [0.27, 0.60]; highest vs lowest quartile)
Increasing weekly physical activity was significantly associated with lower diabetes risk (RR = 0.43 [0.25, 0.74]; high physical activity relative to low). Data shown for men and women combined
Increasing the levels of weekly LTPA was associated with lower risk of diabetes in multivariate adjustment until BMI was included (HR = 0.84 [0.57, 1.25]). OPA was significantly inversely associated with diabetes risk (HR = 0.74 [0.57, 0.95]; active vs light). Active commuting was significantly inversely associated with diabetes risk (HR = 0.64 [0.45, 0.92]; ‡30 min/day vs none). Data shown for men and women combined
Highest EE in physical activity (>1.99 MET-h/day/y) was associated with significantly lower risk of diabetes compared with none (RR = 0.83 [0.7, 0.97]). DPA was associated with moderately lower risk (0.86 [0.73, 0.99]; highest [>15.2 MET] vs lowest) as was CPA (0.67 [0.55, 0.82]; >5.5 MET vs lowest). OPA was not associated with diabetes risk (0.81 [0.48, 1.39]; high vs low)
Increasing physical activity score was associated with significantly reduced risk of diabetes compared with lowest quartile (RR = 0.58 [0.42, 0.78]; highest vs lower 4 quintiles)
Moderate levels of physical activity conferred significantly reduced risk of diabetes relative to inactive men (RR = 0.4 [0.2, 0.7]). No further decrease for vigorous intensity activity
Main findingsa
Physical Activity and Prevention of Diabetes 811
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
891 men, 973 women, 35–63 y; 10 y follow-up; 118 cases
3052 men, 3114 women, 35–74 y; 7.6 y follow-up; 128 cases (men), 85 cases (women)
4069 men, 4034 women, 24–74 y; 7.4 y follow-up; 145 cases (men), 82 cases (women)
37 918 men, 40–75 y; 10 y follow-up; 1058 cases
6013 men, 35–60 y; 10 y follow-up; 444 cases
87 907 postmenopausal women; 5.1 y follow-up; 2271 cases
North-Eastern Finnish Adults[28]
MONICA Augsburg Cohort Study[29] (Germany)
MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study[30] (Germany)
Health Professional’s Follow-up Study[31] (US)
Osaka Health Survey (Japan)[32]
Women’s Health Initiative[13] (Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, Asian)
Values are multivariate adjusted (including BMI) risk [95% confidence intervals] unless otherwise stated.
Weekly EE from walking (0, 0.5–2.5, 2.6–5.0, 5.1–10.0, >10.0 MET-h/wk) and total physical activity (0–2.3, 2.3–7.4, 7.5–13.9, 14.0–23.4, >23.4 MET-h/wk)
Weekday and weekend LTPA (sedentary/moderate/vigorous)
Among Caucasian women, weekly EE from walking (HR = 0.74 [0.62, 0.89], highest vs lowest quintile) and total physical activity (HR = 0.67 [0.56, 0.81]) were significantly associated with lower diabetes risk. In fully adjusted analyses there was no significant association between physical activity and diabetes risk for African-American, Hispanic or Asian women
Physical activity ‡1 time/wk was associated with lower risk of diabetes compared with those who did not exercise weekly (RR = 0.75 [0.61, 0.93]). Vigorous activity 1/wk at weekends was associated with lower risk of diabetes (RR = 0.55 [0.35, 0.88] compared with sedentary men
Inverse association with diabetes risk across increasing quintiles of weekly EE (RR = 0.62 [0.50, 0.76] highest relative to lowest quintile). Time spent watching TV was significantly associated with higher risk for diabetes (RR = 2.31 [1.17, 4.56] highest relative to lowest)
Weekly sport ‡1 h/wk was associated with lower risk of diabetes in women (HR = 0.24 [0.06, 0.98]) but not men (HR = 0.83 [0.50, 1.36]). In subgroup analyses the protective effect of moderate to high physical activity was significant in women with a BMI 24 km/h for a certain duration. This fact therefore applies to all motion category thresholds used to evaluate performance because it will also affect total frequencies and mean durations of each motion type. One way of combating this error is to filter or smooth the data using mathematical algorithms to make inferences on the data. For example, this may also be used to illustrate differences between rapid or gradual accelerations or decelerations by determining how quickly a player has moved through different threshold zones. However, this use of multiple equations within a data set requires further validation of the system. Similarly, although differences have been identified in total distance covered in various levels of performance, with higher levels of performance corresponding with longer distances,[15] caution must also be taken when assessing a player’s match performance based on the total distance covered. In this respect, players may be inefficient with their movement and in essence ‘waste energy’ by performing unnecessary movements, which may actually be detrimental to the team tactic, but result in a large distance covered, and may therefore be open to misinterpretation. Alternatively, a player may remain in low-intensity motion for a significant percentage of a match through being highly efficient in movement selection. This would produce a
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
below-average total distance covered, number of sprints, workload and work rate, yet this player may have had the highest impact on the team’s performance. In turn, an opposing player who is responsible for marking this type of player may also appear to have produced a lower workload than normal. Finally, the overall reporting of results is usually provided macroscopically and in isolation. Traditionally, values for total overall distance, as well as total frequency and mean distance, time and/or percentage time spent in each motion type are reported.[9] This huge amount of data for each match can be a challenge in itself for professional soccer staff to make true assessments of match performance, monitor workloads and plan appropriate physical fitness regimes. In this respect, a recent programmed exercise protocol for netball based on mean ‘bursts’ of high-intensity activity and ‘recoveries’ of low to moderate intensity derived from time-motion analysis proved to be ineffective in enhancing match-play specific physical fitness.[53] To this end, a full range of ‘bursts’ and ‘recoveries’ are sought to design physical conditioning programmes that are specific to soccer match-play. Consequently, ratio scales should be used to present data based on levels of intensity.[54] The holistic approach of reporting work rate data ignores the interaction between and within motions, movements and playing activities. Therefore, it is also important to perform temporal pattern (T-pattern) detection to identify patterns within the data. In this respect, the detection of patterns that are not identifiable through simple observation has great benefit not only in soccer match-play variables, but also in establishing the specific physical performance demands.[55] A T-pattern is essentially a combination of events where the events occur in the same order, with the consecutive time distances between consecutive pattern components remaining relatively invariant with respect to an expectation assuming, as a null hypothesis, that each component is independently and randomly distributed over time. The method of T-patterning has already been employed to establish playing patterns in soccer by identifying complex intra- and interindividual patterns for both individuals and teams using the detected behavioural patterns in combination with elementary statistics.[56] Figure 1 displays a player’s movement ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
849
pattern which identifies a varied range of motion. In this particular pattern, the player starts by shuffling backwards and then sprints forward. After this, he decelerates and finishes with a highintensity shuffle, indicating that he slows down very rapidly. From this point, he skips sideways left at low intensity, turns left and jogs forward at low intensity, gradually increasing pace into a run and changing direction by moving diagonally left to complete the complex pattern. Preliminary investigation of pattern complexity between player positions suggests that a higher number of different patterns and pattern occurrences are detected for defenders than for forwards or midfielders.[55] The same also seems to apply for length of patterns. These findings, and their significance, need further examination, although they could be very useful for creating specific training programmes according to individual positional requirements.
3. Contemporary Motion Analysis Research 3.1 Analysis of Data on Overall Work Rate
There is a growing interest amongst practitioners within elite soccer in the work rate characteristics of soccer players using the data obtained from the various techniques and technologies described in the previous sections. Generally, the overall work rate in field sports can be expressed as distance covered in a game, given that this measure determines the energy expenditure irrespective of the speed of movement and the individual contribution towards the total team effort.[9] This activity can then be broken down into discrete actions for each player across the whole game for classification according to intensity, duration and frequency. Although caution should be taken when comparing the results of various studies because of the differing methodologies employed to obtain data, contemporary outfield male elite soccer players cover on average 9–12 km per match,[15,25,57,58] whilst some players may attain distances of around 14 km (see table II).[59] Observers of elite female soccer players have generally reported lower results than elite male players in terms of overall distance covered (8.7–12 km) but a similar level of physiological strain.[16,19,60-62] From a coaching perspective, it may be of value to compare the overall distance run by individual Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
850
Carling et al.
Fig. 1. An example of a temporal pattern (T-pattern) incorporating regularity of movements by a centre forward in a Premier League match (reproduced from Bloomfield et al.,[55] with permission from IOS Press).
players with that of team mates or opposition players to ascertain relative exertion rates. However, this distance may not be a fair reflection of a player’s performance, as playing style, team formation, technical actions and tactical role also influence overall work rate. For example, Rienzi et al.[65] presented evidence that the distance covered by South American players was about 1 km less than the output of professionals in the English Premier League. The authors suggested that the higher sustained pace by players in the English game could explain this disparity. However, no motion analysis study has yet been conducted to compare the distances run by elite soccer players belonging to teams across a larger range of national championships. Measuring the total distance run may also help in examining the evolution of work rates over sevª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
eral seasons to determine if the physical requirements of the game are the same and whether current training programmes and fitness tests are still optimal. Professionals in the English Premiership tend to cover greater distances during matches than those in the former First Division (pre-1992), which has had obvious consequences on contemporary fitness training programmes.[13] Data presenting the total distance run by 300 professional European midfield players have recently confirmed this upward trend.[43] Although contemporary elite players are running further than in previous years, the effects of playing position on distance run is consistent across the last three decades.[9] A pertinent coaching issue may be to look at a division of the total distance run into data for defending (opposition in possession) and Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
12 400
14 12 12 11 11 6 5
Elite Danish (female)
English professionals (male)
Under 19 professionals (male)
International Swedish/Danish (female)
Elite Swedish/Danish (female)
English professionals (male)
9
8 638
1
6
9 140
10 659
11 000
12 793
10 461
9 010b
14 199b
10 642
11 410
8 800b
10 980a
11 433
12 636
fullback
9 029
10 627
10 020
9 740a
10 650
11 099
central defender
Results did not distinguish between fullbacks and central defenders.
NP = not provided.
c Combined results for central and external midfield players.
b
Japanese professionals (male) 1 10 460 a Results for each playing position were calculated from a combination of data obtained for both groups of players.
Triangulation/camera potentiometer
International Australian (female)
Global positioning system
NP
French professional (male)
English professionals (male)
3
10 864
18 18
European professionals (male)
Champions League matches (male)
Portuguese first division (male)
10 012
55
Brazilian first division (male)
11 393
791
300
Professional European leagues (male)
11 010
10 335
10 100
9 700
10 000
9 741
10 274
10 300
Champions League matches (male)
Automatic tracking on video
36
Professional Australians (male)
Elite Norwegian juniors (male)
Manual computer pen and tablet
Elite English (female)
10 104
17
South American professionals (male)
10 860
10 150
10 800
23
23
Danish Premier League (male)
10 330
18
24
Elite Danish (male)
11 264
Swedish Premier League (male)
24
English professionals (male)
9 890
11 979
total
Distance covered (m)
Italian professionals (male)
30 29
International English (female)
Number of players
Italian junior professionals (male)
Manual video analysis
League/competition level (sex)
9 640
11 000
12 958
8 510
11 224
43 9 612
10 537c
33
60
69
37
46
68
44
25
67 11 254
66
38
61
65
19
19
58
58
16
65
15
64
64
15
13
17
63
Reference
11 570
9 900
10 480a
11 804
forward
12 009c
10 100
11 000a
12 075
12 971
midfielder
Table II. Summary of motion analysis data from different systems of the total distances run and according to playing position by contemporary soccer players, 1999–2007
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer 851
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Carling et al.
852
attacking (own team in possession) play. This comparison may help to determine whether players are working as much in a defensive role as they are in attack. At present, this factor has not been examined in the scientific literature. Results are likely to be affected by the tactical role of players, for example a ‘holding’ midfielder deployed on mainly defensive duties will no doubt cover less distance than other midfielders when his/her team is attacking. Another concern may be to identify whether physical demands are comparable between different levels within elite soccer, for example, between the various divisions in professional leagues. A comparison of professional Italian and elite Danish players showed that the former covered a significantly higher distance during games.[15] A motion analysis study of the total distance run by the same elite females competing at both national (for their clubs) and at international level (for their national team) established that these players ran significantly greater distances when competing at international level.[19] The observation highlights the need to take the level of competition, and perhaps the importance of the game, into consideration when interpreting data on motion analysis of match-play. It is not feasible to use the total distance run to compare the overall physical contributions of players when there is a difference in the overall duration of games. For example, different categories of age in youth soccer generally play games of different durations, and other types of soccer such as futsal are limited to a total of 40 minutes play. An alternative means of comparing the overall physical contributions of players is to calculate a relative measurement of performance by correcting the absolute value (total distance covered) for the match to a minute-by-minute analysis of distance run. Recent studies have shown that the intensity of play in professional futsal[70] was higher than for elite players competing in the Australian National league.[38] The futsal players covered on average 117 m per minute compared with 111 m per minute for the Australian players, indicating that the intensity of the game of futsal may be higher than that for traditional soccer games, although analysis of data on players in professional European Laegues is needed to substantiate this claim. ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
3.2 Categories of Movements
In field sports such as soccer, movement activities are generally coded according to their intensity, which is determined by the speed of actions. When evaluating performance, the frequency of each type of movement and the time spent or distance run in each movement can be analysed. The main categories generally used to analyse soccer work rate are classed as standing, walking, jogging, cruising (striding) and sprinting. These categories have recently been extended to include other activities such as skipping and shuffling.[26] Most activities in soccer are carried out at a submaximal level of exertion, but there are many other gamerelated activities that must be taken into account such as alterations in pace, changes in direction, execution of specific game skills, and tracking opponents (which are examined later in this section). Elite players spend the majority of the total game time in the low-intensity motions of walking, jogging and standing.[13,15,43] In comparison, highintensity efforts (cruising and sprinting) constitute around 10% of the total distance covered.[3,9] This finding compares with analysis of performance in professional futsal games where the percentage of the total distance covered spent in high intensity is almost one-quarter (22.6%) and can, on occasions, exceed one-third.[70] Research on female performance has shown that these players spend more time in lower intensity activities compared with males, which may be explained by biological differences such as endurance capacity.[71] In soccer, activities at lower levels of intensity such as jogging and walking tend to dominate work rate profiles. However, the impact of high-intensity efforts in match-play cannot be over-emphasized, and it has been suggested that this feature may be the most appropriate means of evaluating and interpreting physical performance.[16,57] Measurement of high-intensity exercise, for example every 5 minutes during the course of the game, is an alternative way for coaches to evaluate overall work rate. High-intensity exercise is a constant feature across matches[9] and games are often won or lost on successful attempts at scoring carried out at high speed.[71] The high-intensity category of work rate includes the addition of cruising and sprinting actions, which are predetermined according to running speed. In elite soccer, players Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
generally have to run at a high intensity every 60 seconds and sprint all-out once every 4 minutes.[13] However, Di Salvo and co-workers[43] presented evidence that the number of sprints made per player ranges greatly (3–40). These authors suggested that this finding strongly depended upon individual playing position. Because of the intermittent nature of the game, performance can be enhanced through improving players’ ability to perform high-intensity work repeatedly. The timing of anaerobic efforts, their quality (distance, duration) and the capacity to repeat these efforts, whether in possession of the ball or without, are crucial since the success of their deployment plays a critical role in the outcome of games.[8] Players in successful teams competing within the same elite league were reported to perform more high-speed running and sprinting in the most intense periods of the game and more sprinting over the whole 90 minutes than less successful teams.[64] In elite soccer, the average distance and duration of sprints is short, as evidence has shown that these activities are rarely more than 20 m in length and tend to last around 4 seconds.[3,43,58] These findings imply that when a player is required to sprint, his or her acceleration capabilities may be of greater importance than their maximal running speed, as the tactical demands of the game probably render it unnecessary to attain maximal speeds. Improving performance in these actions will help players in many aspects of their game, such as being first to the ball or getting away from a marker. For example, if a player tends to lose out by poor acceleration or lack of speed over a short distance, the trainer could suggest an individual speed development programme. A more detailed motion analysis study on the characteristics of sprint patterns of players during competition could be beneficial. For example, no information is available on whether sprints commence from a variety of starting speeds such as a standing start or when jogging and, if so, does such differentiation also exist between playing positions. A recent study on elite rugby union players showed that forwards commenced these actions most frequently from a standing start (41%), whereas backs sprinted from standing (29%), walking (29%), jogging (29%) and occasionally striding (13%) starts.[72] Practitioners designing conditioning programmes would no
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
853
doubt benefit from this information by ensuring that training sessions involve the actual movement patterns performed in matches. The programme can then provide sufficient overload through careful manipulations of the match demands in preparation for competition. This may involve alterations in playing time, size of pitch or number of players involved in order to increase the training intensity. In soccer, only a small percentage of the total distance covered by players is with possession of the ball. Nevertheless, evidence from a field test of maximum oxygen consumption has shown that running with the ball significantly raises oxygen consumption and energy expenditure and should be taken into account when evaluating player efforts.[73] The vast majority of actions are ‘off the ball’, either in running to contest possession, supporting team-mates, tracking opposing players, executing decoy runs, making counter-runs by marking a player, or challenging an opponent. These actions often require frequent changes in movement activities, such as accelerations and decelerations, changes of direction, turns and unorthodox movement patterns (backwards and sideways runs), and contribute significantly to additional energy expenditure.[8] The latest GPS systems reportedly enable the quantification of the stress placed upon players from accelerations, decelerations, changes of direction and impacts, permitting the individualization and optimization of exercise and recovery programmes[48] – although this claim has yet to be scientifically validated. A challenge for future researchers is to investigate and combine data both on contacts, collisions and tackles and on motion analysis categories into a single index of training and competition loading. Two studies have recently been undertaken to investigate deceleration[74] and turning[75] movements in professional soccer. Players were shown to perform an average of 54.1 deceleration movements and 558 turning movements during ‘purposeful movement’ passages from Premier League matches. The authors suggested that both these types of actions are a common and highly important part of the modern game, and there is a particular need for developing specific deceleration and turning exercises in strength and conditioning training sessions. An investigation into whether the inclusion of an enforced deceleration phase on
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Carling et al.
854
repeated sprint efforts would cause greater fatigue and slower sprint times compared with efforts undertaken without this phase may be of interest in further understanding match performance and optimizing fitness training programmes. The activity profile of players may be influenced by the style of play used by individual clubs and by regional differences. Such regional differences in performance are important because players moving between countries will probably need time to adapt both physically and tactically to the particular style of the different leagues. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of studies attempting to address either cultural or geographical differences in the work rate pattern,[27] especially at international level or between various professional leagues. Similarly, motion analysis research on the work rate performance characteristics of female and, in particular, younger players is still relatively limited in the literature. Results of a recent study on elite Brazilian youth players belonging to under 15, under 17 and under 20 age groups indicated significant differences in both overall workload and individual playing positions according to player age.[76] The age of players should therefore be a relevant factor when evaluating work rate profiles. 3.3 Determining Positional Demands
Understanding the workload imposed on toplevel soccer players according to their positional role during competitive matches is necessary to develop a sport-specific training protocol.[43] Contemporary data[13,15,43] generally confirm the previously identified trend[11,20] that midfield players generally cover greater distances in a game than defenders or forwards. Goalkeepers usually cover much lower distances (around 4 km) per match. However, individual differences in the distance covered are not just related to a division into basic traditional team positions of defenders, midfielders and attackers. For each playing position, there may be a significant variation in the physical demands, depending on the tactical role and the physical capacity of the players. For example, Barros et al.[25] and Di Salvo et al.[43] showed that in professional Brazilian and European soccer, fullbacks ran significantly further than central defenders. Similar results between defensive positions have also been obtained for ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
international female soccer players.[62] These results highlight that individual differences in playing style and physical performance should be taken into account when planning training and nutritional strategies.[77] Again, marked differences in the intensity of various running activities exist across the various playing positions. A detailed analysis of English Premier League players showed that playing position (defender, midfielder and attacker) had a significant influence on the time spent sprinting, running, shuffling, skipping and standing still.[21] Rienzi et al.[65] observed that defenders perform more backward running than strikers. Similarly, it has been reported that Premier League midfielders and strikers engaged in significantly more of the ‘other’ type of movements (jumping, landing, diving, sliding, slowing down, falling and getting up) than the other positions.[21] Analysis of work rate categories also suggests that training and fitness testing should be tailored specifically to positional groups (e.g. separation between central and external midfielders) rather than simply differentiating between forwards, midfielders and defenders because each positional group has its own unique physical demands. For example, a variation of 1.9 km in the distances covered at high intensities by midfield players in the same game has been observed.[15] Variations in work rate between players may imply that not all positions are taxed to full capacity in every game. Findings from a study comparing 123 professional European players showed that central defenders sprinted significantly less distance than fullbacks.[43] A large-scale study of professional Spanish soccer players reported a significant difference in the total distance sprinted by wide midfielders compared with central midfielders.[78] This research again demonstrates the need for a criterion model in order to tailor training programmes and strategies to suit the particular needs of individual playing positions. Research dividing the high-intensity efforts of players for defending and attacking play would be pertinent to determine whether positional role determines the physical contribution of players according to whether their team is in possession or not. Motion analysis and its application to training must also take into account the relationship between the physical and technical demands of games. For example, match data on professional English Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
855
players show that forwards tend to receive the ball more frequently when cruising and sprinting than defenders and midfielders, indicating that the ability required to implement technical skills at pace when attacking is important for this position.[79] 3.4 Use of Motion Analysis in Studies of Fatigue
In motion analyses of soccer, data may be split into distinct time-frames to help establish whether work rate varies with time or task. According to analyses and performance measures during elite match-play, fatigue manifested as a decreased performance seems to occur at three different stages in a game: (i) after short-term intense periods in both halves; (ii) in the initial phase of the second half; and (iii) towards the end of the game.[57] Simple comparisons of the overall work rate between first and second halves of matches can indicate the occurrence of fatigue, although it may be more closely identified if activities during the game are broken up into 5- or 15-minute segments.[8] Minute-by-minute analysis of work rate throughout a game has also been employed as a possible means of identifying a drop-off in physical performance.[25] In soccer, the evidence of a difference in the total distance covered between halves is inconsistent and a significant decrement does not necessarily occur in all players, especially if players operate below their physical capacities in the first half. Therefore, a simple comparison of the overall distance run per half may not be a valid means to allow interpretation on whether or not a player has experienced fatigue. Nevertheless, table III presents data from various studies comparing the total distance run by
elite soccer players for the two halves of the game. An average difference of 3.1% in the total distance run between halves (range 9.4% to þ0.8%) can be observed across all studies on elite soccer. The largest difference between the total distance run in the first half compared with the second half was reported for players participating in the Australian National Football League.[38] Professional Brazilian players have also been reported to cover significantly more distance in the first half,[25] whereas more recent data showed no significant difference in work rates between halves for elite Spanish players and other European players participating in Spanish League and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Champions League games.[43] In this latter study, the data may have been confounded, as no mention was made as to the inclusion of substitutes and the effect their work rates may have had on the results. Nevertheless, individual teams and players may pace their efforts in order to finish the game strongly. A comparison of total distance run between match halves of the winners (Barcelona) and losers (Arsenal) of the 2005–06 UEFA Champions League final showed that the Spanish players covered more distance in the second half than in the first half (5121 vs 5218 m).[68] In contrast, players belonging to the losing team who completed the whole match covered slightly less ground in the second half (5297 vs 5252 m) than in the first half, suggesting they may have been forced into a fatigued state. In this study, the data may have been confounded as Arsenal was forced to play with ten players for the majority of the game due to the dismissal of the goalkeeper.
Table III. Comparison of distances covered by elite soccer players during the first and second halves of competitive match-play Study
Nationality
Distance run (m)
Difference (%)
total
1st half
2nd half
Barros et al.[25]
Brazilian
10 012
5173
4808
Burgess et al.[38]
Australian
10 100
5300
4800
9.4
Di Salvo et al.[43]
European
11 393
5709
5684
0.4
Miyagi et al.[33]
Japanese
10 460
5315
5141
3.3
Mohr et al.[15]
Italian
10 860
5510
5350
2.9
Danish
10 330
5200
5130
1.3
7.1
Rienzi et al.[65]
South American/English
9 020
4605
4415
4.1
Zubillaga et al.[68]
English
10 549
5297
5252
0.9
Spanish
10 339
5121
5218
þ1.9
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
856
A 14% slower overall speed in the second half of the game when compared with the first half has been reported in elite Australian soccer players.[38] This result was attributed to fewer observations of the low-intensity movements (9.0% less walking and 12.4% less jogging) and more stationary periods. Engagement in game events such as kicking and passing was also 11.2% less frequent in the second versus the first half of games. Similarly, a recent study of work rates in professional Italian players examined the effects of fatigue on technical performance.[80] A significant decline between the first and second half was found for both physical performance and some technical scores (involvements with the ball, short passes and successful short passes). Minute-by-minute analysis of total distances covered by Brazilian players revealed significant differences after the fifth minute of the game, with highly significant differences after the eighth.[25] The authors suggested that this more detailed analysis may allow a better understanding of fatigue. However, these results should be treated with caution as it is highly unlikely that players experience fatigue so soon during a match. This reduction in performance is more likely to be linked to play settling down after the frantic first few minutes of the game where engagement is at its most intense. Indeed, a study by Rahnama et al.[67] yielded evidence that the majority of critical game incidents and the highest intensity of activities were observed in the first 15 minutes of the game. A significant reduction in the distance run at medium[43] and high intensity[37,63] between halves has been reported in players competing in elite European soccer games and tournaments. In elite Scandinavian soccer players, the amount of highintensity running was lower (35–45%) in the last 15 minutes than in the first 15 minutes of the game, with more than 40% of the players having their lowest amount of intense exercise in the last 15 minutes.[15] This trend was confirmed in a study of elite female players where a marked decrease in the amount of high-intensity running within each half was observed and 13 of 14 players did their least amount of high-intensity running in the last 15minute period of the first or second half.[16] Similarly, GPS-based tracking of activity patterns in professional futsal players has shown that during the last period of the game, the number of bouts of high-intensity exercise significantly decreased.[81]
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Carling et al.
However, the total distance covered or the amount of sprinting may be unaffected between playing halves in certain players,[25] and the distance covered in high-intensity activities may even increase between halves[82] and in the last few minutes of the game.[8] Players carrying out fewer actions at low or moderate intensity may be ‘sparing’ their efforts for the final few crucial actions as their energy levels become depleted. Some players demonstrating no decrease in performance between halves or in the final quarter of the match may have paced themselves in order to finish the game strongly. A pertinent study may be to examine whether the type of competitive match affects work rate and any subsequent reduction in performance. For example, it would be relevant to determine whether players tend to work harder or demonstrate greater fatigue during Cup games than during League games or when playing against teams from lower standards of play. In addition, research to investigate work rates in the extra-time period during Cup matches would provide useful information on the occurence of fatigue and which players tend to cope better. Another method of examining fatigue may be to concentrate on the maximal speed or duration of individual sprints to determine whether a player’s sprint performance is declining (e.g. is the player slower?) towards the end of the match. The maximal sprint speed of an international midfield soccer player averaged every 5 minutes throughout the match has been reported to decrease significantly towards the end of the match.[82] However, as the data were drawn from a case study of one player, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the relationship between maximal sprinting speed and fatigue. In addition, soccer players may not always reach maximal speed during sprinting actions, because of the tactical demands of the particular situations restricting the length of these runs. Work rate analysis to determine whether there is a decrease in the capacity to accelerate rather than in maximal sprint speed towards the end of a game may be a more pertinent means of evaluating the occurrence of fatigue, although no study has as yet examined this feature. Nevertheless, work rate information indicating fatigue towards the end of the game could lead the coach to change tactics or even make a substitution to avoid the opposition exploiting this emerging physical weakness. Substituting players before the onset of fatigue towards the end of the
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
game may restore the imbalances in work rate. Substitute players have been shown to cover significantly more ground at high intensity during the final 15 minutes than the other players already present on the pitch.[15] The latest video-tracking systems allow coaches to analyse work rate in realtime and make objective evidence-based decisions when attempting to identify players who may need replacing. Evaluating fatigue during match-play may lead coaches to examine whether the intensity of the following sprint is affected by the intensity of the previous sprint (e.g. if the sprint is long and at maximal speed). It may also be useful to look at the relationship between successive sprints and whether the intensity of the subsequent activities is affected, for example if moderate-intensity exercise has more of a negative impact on ensuing sprint performance than efforts at low intensity. Individual sprints often depend on the requirements of the game situation, and particularly the recovery allowed by the unpredictable nature of play. After the 5-minute period during which the amount of high-intensity running peaked in one study, performance was reduced by 12% in the following 5 minutes compared with the game average in elite players.[15] Further data on Fourth Division Danish players have shown that performance of the third, fourth and fifth sprints carried out after a period of intense exercise during the first half was reduced compared with before the game.[83] This finding together with the observation that sprint performance measured at the end of the first half was the same as before the match, provided direct evidence that fatigue occurs temporarily during a game. Fatigue may be evident as a prolonged recovery during the game, for example increased time spent in low-intensity activities. The reason for this decline in performance could be repeated pressure from the opposition on an individual player, eventually leading to an inability to respond to game demands. Rampinini et al.[84] recently observed that the work rate of a team of professional soccer players was significantly influenced by the activity profile of opponents. Fatigue during match-play may be transient, the player recovering once there is respite from the opponents. In this instance, tactical support for the player targeted is vital so that the offence from the opponents is not relentless. However, the same study[84] showed that
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
857
the total distance covered and the amount of highintensity running during matches were higher against ‘better’ opponent teams than against ‘lesser’ opponent teams. This finding suggests that players can increase or decrease their work rate according to both the demands of individual matches and to the quality of the opposition. A study of the relationship between match scoreline and work rate in soccer showed that players performed significantly less high-intensity activity when winning than when the score was level.[85] Players also performed significantly less high-intensity activity when losing than when the score was level. The authors suggested that players on teams that are winning relax their work rate, allowing opponents back into the game, and that players on teams that are trailing may lose the motivation to maintain a sufficient work rate. When a team is ahead, however, forward players perform significantly more exercise – although this only appears to relate to the ~10-minute period directly after a goal has been scored, and the elevated work rate is not ultimately sustained.[86] This phenomenon merits further investigation, together with the impact of the time in the match at which goals are scored, the actual score-line, the significance of goal to score-line, as well as the impact of dismissals, specific formations and tactics on the work rate of players. Work rates may vary between successive matches and different phases of the season, with players periodically experiencing a possible decline in performance. Distance covered per match may vary, which again suggests that players may not always be fully utilizing their physical capacity.[8] Reasons may include the specific tactical role chosen by the coach for the player or the self-imposed physical demands chosen by the player. Analysis of the total distance run by top-level players has been shown to vary significantly for individual players at different stages of the season with players covering greater distances at the end of the season.[15] These discrepancies may be partly explained by changes in the physical condition of the players as the work rate profile fluctuates in conjunction with the amount of training that is completed by teams.[27] During an intense schedule of three competitive matches in 5 days in the English Premier League, total distance run did not vary significantly,[69] suggesting this measurement may not be always be
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
858
a valid indicator of a drop-off in performance during the season. Analysis of the physical efforts made in the various categories of movement may yield information on whether the performance of a player is decreasing across different games. A case report comparing the performance of an international French player over five successive weekend matches showed little variation in the distance covered within the different categories of running.[45] In top-class Danish soccer, the CV in high-intensity running has been shown to be 9.2% between successive matches, whereas it was 24.8% between different stages of the season.[15] The seasonal variation is most likely due to alterations in fitness as the competitive schedule reaches a peak. However, few reports have included the ambient conditions under which the games analysed were played.[27] As soccer is often played across all four seasons of the year, a future study to examine the relationship between physical performance and playing conditions is recommended. Similarly, a study comparing work rate performance between games played at varying times of the day would be pertinent. Teams may be required to play several games within a very short time-frame and there is potential for residual fatigue and incomplete recovery to affect the movement patterns of players during subsequent games. English Premiership soccer players were reported to demonstrate a significant increase in recovery time between high-intensity efforts during an intense period of three matches in 5 days.[69] Further work is needed to identify whether performance is affected significantly between playing positions. Nevertheless, this finding indicates that motion analysis data can play an important role in the approach to training and preparation before and during intense playing schedules. A future study could be designed to look at a possible relationship between work rate and injury occurrence. For example, a decline in high-intensity performance over several consecutive matches may suggest that recuperation of a player is needed to avoid becoming susceptible to ‘overtraining’. Similarly, players returning after injury could have their profiles scrutinized to see how they have recovered from intense periods of play, or have their performance compared against a benchmark profile obtained from previous matches. Once a susceptibility to fatigue is identified in individual players, the possible reasons for its ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Carling et al.
occurrence should be explored. A reduction in activity has been identified at the beginning of the second half compared with the first half.[57] During the break, players tend to rest, leading to a drop in muscle temperature and subsequently to reduced performance levels. Mohr and co-workers[87] presented evidence that undertaking a few minutes of low- to moderate-intensity exercise during the pause may help players to ‘ready’ themselves and to perform better physically straight after the break. As previously mentioned, fatigue can also occur as the end of a game draws near. Reduced exercise performance at the end of soccer games may be associated with lowered glycogen levels in individual muscle fibres.[77] Therefore, adequate attention to nutritional preparation (before, during and after matches) for competition is necessary. The effectiveness of nutritional interventions could be monitored using motion analysis in match-play. Monitoring efforts during training by means of heart rate monitors may also help coaches to avoid over-exerting players before matches and lowering their energy stores. This information can now be combined with motion analysis data from electronic transmitters worn by players to determine individual physiological workload during training. 3.5 Other Uses of Motion Analysis Research
Physiological studies and motion analysis research on elite soccer players have provided evidence that the total amount of work done during matchplay is related to the maximal aerobic power of players, which underlines the need for a high level of aerobic fitness.[17,88] This fact is especially important for certain playing positions such as midfield players who are expected to work harder than the other outfield positions. Motion analysis studies may be employed to determine the effects of a training intervention on competition work rate. Evidence shows thatimprovements in maximal oxygen uptake after an 8-week period of aerobic interval training corresponded to significant increases in the total distance covered during a match in elite junior players.[66] Players who are aerobically well trained can maintain their work rates better towards the end of the game than those of poorer aerobic fitness.[9] Increasing maximal aerobic power may also aid recovery following successive bouts of high-intensity anaerobic efforts, which produce transient fatiSports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
gue.[45] Its role is paramount because the recovery during repeated-sprint bouts in soccer is often of an active nature. A 6-week programme of aerobic interval training undertaken by a group of amateur senior players led to an 18% increase in high-intensity activities during competition.[17] However, there is still a limited amount of knowledge on the effects of training programmes on actual performance of players in matches at elite level. In addition, no motion analysis study in elite soccer has as yet assessed the degree to whether the physical demands of the game are adequately replicated in training. For example, it may be worthwhile determining whether players undertake comparable amounts of high-intensity exercise (e.g. number and duration of sprints) in training as in match-play. Over recent years, researchers have attempted to examine the validity of selected field tests by establishing links withon-field physicalperformance. The results from such tests can help to determine the physical capacity of players and whether they may be susceptible to experiencing fatigue during matchplay. The results from a ‘repeated sprint ability’ test have been highly correlated to the total distance covered in competition when sprinting.[44] Similarly, a strong correlation has been observed between an intermittent recovery test and both total distance run and sprint performance in elite females.[16] Mohr et al.[15] assessed the relationship between physical fitness and match performance at two standards of soccer. They compared the performance of top class soccer players versus moderate level players both in an intermittent recovery test and in work rates in match-play. The top players demonstrated superior performance in the intermittent test and carried out significantly more high-intensity running and sprinting during match-play. These results justify the use of field and laboratory fitness testing of players and linking the fitness data to work rate assessments. However, the majority of research has been carried out on top-level Scandinavian players and further research (and on a larger scale) is needed to test these relationships in higher level professional leagues and for differing age groups. Furthermore, although various tests have been related closely with the physiological load imposed through match-play, they still appear to lack ecological validity with respect to the motion types, directions, turns and intensities correspondª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
859
ing to the physical demands of the game and do not provide sufficiently adapted protocols for the individual playing positions within soccer.[21] These questions may be resolved using motion analysis methods for determining precise locomotor activities during matches. Motion analysis data drawn from match-play have also been employed to help design laboratorybased protocols to simulate soccer-specific intermittent exercise and examine factors such as the effects of training interventions,[89] nutritional strategies,[90] temperature[91] and fatigue on performance. In the application to fatigue, an intermittent-exercise protocol was designed to simulate the exercise intensities associated with playing a match in order to monitor the functional characteristics of lower limb muscles at half-time and at the end of the 90 minutes.[92] Results showed a progressive increase in muscle fatigue due to a decline in muscle strength as exercise continued. Findings therefore had implications for competitive performance and further understanding of the reported increased risk of injury towards the end of the game. A future focus on the relationship between injury occurrence and fatigue during actual competitive match-play should be beneficial. For example, motion analysis techniques could be employed to examine whether players are more at risk of injury after periods of high-intensity exercise.
4. Conclusions A thorough understanding of the physical demands of soccer via information on player work rates is required so that optimal training and preparation strategies can be constructed. As shown in the present review, an ever-increasing number of scientific investigations based on motion analysis techniques are providing important information on elite soccer play. These investigations have identified the activity profiles and physical requirements of contemporary elite soccer as well as the demands of individual playing positions. Motion analysis research has also allowed investigators to determine the extent of fatigue experienced by players during competition as well as variations in physical performance over the course of the season. There are also possibilities to link fitness data to work rate assessments and to determine the effects of training interventions on match performance. Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Carling et al.
860
Many of these investigations into work rate have been possible thanks to major advances in computer and video technology, which are providing more efficient ways of obtaining and analysing data, especially on a larger scale. A plethora of commercial analysis systems are now available, albeit with a price range varying by many thousands of dollars. The cost of many systems currently used in elite soccer is often prohibitive to all but the wealthiest clubs. Similarly, many researchers are still using older techniques, given that they do not have access to these more advanced technologies due to the large costs associated with using them. Using information derived from these latest techniques, academics could start to test and build upon existing research by exploring some of the gaps and questions identified throughout this review. Furthermore, conducting research into how these technologies are actually being put into use within coaching contexts would be pertinent, as there is little appreciation about how effectively and efficiently they are being translated and adopted by practitioners to prepare and develop members of their squad. This reservation applies to both the operators’ comprehension and the coaches’ use of data derived from these tools. Additionally, the measurement precision and reliability of systems proven on the basis of sound scientific evidence has not always been satisfactorily demonstrated. No current method has been accepted as the ‘gold’ standard approach to work rate analysis, and few investigators have attempted to make comparisons between different methodologies and technologies. It is imperative that researchers investigate the scientific legitimacy of these systems so that applied practitioners and the academic community can be assured of their accuracy when employing these methods. Nevertheless, the perfecting of motion analysis technologies will no doubt continue as it has done over recent years, with real-time analysis and application becoming the norm.
Acknowledgements The authors have received no funding for the preparation of this article. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review except that Christopher Carling and Lee Nelsen have previously participated in the development of the AMISCO Pro match analysis system and Jonathan Bloomfield was previously employed by Prozone Group Limited.
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
References 1. Williams AM, Hodges NJ. Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: challenging tradition. J Sports Sci 2005 Jun; 23 (6): 637-50 2. Reilly T, Williams AM, editors. Science and soccer. London: Routledge, 2003 3. Stølen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, et al. Physiology of soccer: an update. Sports Med 2005; 35 (6): 501-36 4. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J Sports Sci 2005 Jun; 23 (6): 583-92 5. Gilbourne D, Richardson D. A practitioner-focused approach to the provision of psychological support in soccer: adopting action research themes and processes. J Sports Sci 2005 Jun; 23 (6): 651-8 6. Lees A, Nolan L. The biomechanics of soccer: a review. J Sports Sci 1998 Apr; (3) 16: 211-34 7. Reilly T, Gilbourne D. Science and football: a review of applied research in the football codes. J Sports Sci 2003 Sep; 21 (9): 693-705 8. Carling C, Williams AM, Reilly T. The handbook of soccer match analysis. London: Routledge, 2005 9. Reilly T. Science of training: soccer. London: Routledge, 2007 10. Reilly T. An ergonomics model of the soccer training process. J Sports Sci 2005 Jun; 23 (6): 561-72 11. Reilly T, Thomas V. A motion analysis of work-rate in different positional roles in professional football matchplay. J Hum Mov Stud 1976, 97 12. James N. The role of notational analysis in soccer coaching. Int J Sport Sci Coaching 2006; 1 (2): 185-98 13. Strudwick T, Reilly T. Work-rate profiles of elite premier league football players. Insight FA Coaches Assoc J 2001, 59 14. Reilly T, Drust B, Clarke N. Muscle fatigue during soccer match-play. Sports Med 2008; 38 (5): 357-67 15. Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci 2003 Jul; 21 (7): 519-28 16. Krustrup P, Mohr M, Ellingsgaard H, et al. Physical demands during an elite female soccer game: importance of training status. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 Jul; 37 (7): 1242-8 17. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Castagna C, et al. Physiological and performance effects of generic versus specific aerobic training in soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2006 Jun; 27 (6): 483-92 18. Randers MB, Jensen JM, Krustrup P. Comparison of activity profile during matches in Danish and Swedish premier league and matches in Nordic royal league tournament [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 16 19. Andersson H, Krustrup P, Mohr M. Differences in movement pattern, heart rate and fatigue development in international versus national league matches of Swedish and Danish elite female soccer players [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 109 20. Bangsbo J, Norregaard J, Thorsoe F. Activity profile of competition soccer. Can J Sports Sci 1991; 16 (2): 110-6 21. Bloomfield J, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. Physical demands of different positions in FA Premier League soccer. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 (1): 63-70
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer
22. The Observer 5.0 Video-Pro [online]. Available from URL: http://www.noldus.com/site/doc200407014 [Accessed 2007 Jul 25] 23. Bloomfield J, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. Reliability of the Bloomfield Movement Classification. Int J Perf Anal Sport 2007 Jan; 7 (1): 20-7 24. Edgecomb SJ, Norton KI. Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring player movement distance during Australian Football. J Sci Med Sport 2006 May; 9 (1-2): 25-32 25. Barros RML, Misuta MS, Menezes RP, et al. Analysis of the distances covered by first division Brazilian soccer players obtained with an automatic tracking method. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 (2): 233-42 26. Bloomfield J, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. The ‘Bloomfield Movement Classification’: motion analysis of individual players in dynamic movement sports. Int J Perf Anal Sport 2004 Dec; 4 (2): 20-31 27. Drust B, Atkinson G, Reilly T. Future perspectives in the evaluation of the physiological demands of soccer. Sports Med 2007; 37 (9): 783-805 28. Biotrainert: sporting teams [online]. Available from URL: http://www.citechholdings.com/index.html [Accessed 2007 Aug 8] 29. Toki S, Sakurai S. Quantitative match analysis of soccer games with two dimensional DLT procedures [abstract no. 911]. XXth Congress of International Society of Biomechanics; 2005 Jul 31- Aug 5; Cleaveland (OH) 30. INMOTIO. You can’t improve what you can’t measure [online]. Available from URL: http://www.inmotio.nl/ EN/4/change.html [Accessed 2007 Aug 2] 31. Technology solutions for sport [online]. Available from URL: http://www.feedbacksport.com [Accessed 2008 Sep 1] 32. Shiokawa M, Takahashi K, Kan A, et al. Computer analysis of a soccer game by the DLT method focusing on the movement of the players and the ball [abstract no. 267]. V World Congress of Science and Football; 2003 Apr 11-15; Lisbon 33. Miyagi O, Ohashi J, Kitagawa K. Motion characteristics of an elite soccer player during a game: communications to the Fourth World Congress of Science and Football [abstract]. J Sports Sci 1999; 17 (10): 816 34. What is DatatraX? [online]. Available from URL: http:// www.datatrax.tv/ [Accessed 2007 Jul 28] 35. Di Salvo V, Collins A, McNeill B, et al. Validation of prozone: a new video-based performance analysis system. Int J Perf Anal Sport 2006 Jun; 6 (1): 108-19 36. Welcome to RealTrackFootball! [online]. Available from URL: http://www.realtrackfutbol.com/ingles/start-gb.html [Accessed 2007 Aug 2] 37. Brule´ P, Carling C, David A, et al. AMISCO: the development of a computerised match analysis system to automatically track the movements of soccer players [abstract]. Proceedings of the IV World Congress of Notational Analysis of Sport, University of Porto; 1998 Sep 22-25; Porto, 36 38. Burgess DJ, Naughton G, Norton KI. Profile of movement demands of national football players in Australia. J Sci Med Sport 2006 Aug; 9 (4): 334-41 39. Sports analysis [online]. Available from URL: http://www. tracab.com/products_analysis.asp [Accessed 2007 Jul 28]
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
861
40. Ohashi J, Togari H, Isokawa M, et al. measuring movement speeds and distances covered during soccer match-play. In: Reilly T, editor. Science and football. London: E & FN Spon, 1988: 329-33 41. Ohta T, Togari H, Komiya Y. Game analysis of soccer. Tokyo: Japanese Football Association, 1969 42. Liebermann DG, Katz L, Hughes MD, et al. Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. J Sports Sci 2002 Oct; 20 (10): 755-69 43. Di Salvo V, Baron R, Tschan H, et al. Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. Int J Sports Med 2007 Mar; 28 (3): 222-7 44. Rampinini E, Bishop D, Marcora SM, et al. Validity of simple field tests as indicators of match-related physical performance in top-level professional soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2007 Mar, 35 45. Carling C. Getting the most out of football video and match analysis. Insight FA Coaches Assoc J 2001; 5 (3): 16-7 46. Fernandes O, Caixinha P. A new method of time-motion analysis for soccer training and competition [abstract no. 505]. V World Congress of Science and Football; 2003 Apr 11-15; Lisbon 47. Larsson P. Global positioning system and sport-specific testing. Sports Med 2003; 33 (15): 1093-101 48. GPSports’ SPI Elite & Team AMS [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gpsports.com [Accessed 2007 Aug 2] 49. Witte TH, Wilson AM. Accuracy of WAAS-enabled GPS for the determination of position and speed over ground. J Biomech 2005 Aug; 38 (8): 1717-22 50. O P. Sources of variability in time-motion data; measurement error and within player variability in work-rate. Int J Perf Anal Sport 2004 Dec; 4 (2): 42-9 51. Mallo J, Navarro E, Garcı´ a-Aranda J, et al. Activity profile of top-class association football referees in relation to performance in selected physical tests. J Sports Sci 2007 May; 25 (7): 805-13 52. Roberts S, Trewartha G, et al. A comparison of time-motion analysis methods for field based sports. Int J Sports Phys Perf 2006; 1: 388-99 53. O’Donoghue PG, Cassidy D. The effect of specific intermittent training on the fitness of international netball players. J Sports Sci 2002; 20 (1): 56-7 54. O’Donoghue PG. Analysis of the duration of periods of high-intensity activity and low-intensity recovery performed during English FA Premier League soccer. J Sports Sci 2003; 21 (4): 285-6 55. Bloomfield JG, Jonsson K, Polman RCJ, et al. Temporal pattern analysis and its applicability in soccer. In: Anolli L, Duncan S, Magnusson M, et al., editors. The hidden structure of social interaction: from genomics to cultural patterns. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2005: 237-51 56. Borrie A, Jonsson GK, Magnusson MS, et al. Temporal pattern analysis and its applicability in sport: an explanation and exemplar data. J Sport Sci 2002; 20 (10): 845-52 57. Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Fatigue in soccer: a brief review. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (6): 593-9 58. Thatcher R, Batterham AM. Development and validation of a sport-specific exercise protocol for elite youth soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004; 44 (1): 15-22
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
862
59. Fernandes O, Caixinha P, Malta P. Techno-tactics and running distance analysis by camera [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 204 60. Hewitt A, Withers R, Lyons K. Match analyses of Australian international women soccer players using an athlete tracking device [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 107 61. Holmes L. A physiological analysis of work-rate in English female football players. Insight FA Coaches Assoc J 2002; 5 (2): 55-9 62. Scott D, Drust B. Work-rate analysis of elite female soccer players during match-play [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 107 63. Di Salvo V, Baron R, Cardinale M. Time motion analysis of elite footballers in European cup competitions [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 14 64. Randers MB, Rostgaard T, Krustrup P. Physical match performance and yo-yo IR2 test results of successful and unsuccessful football teams in the Danish premier league [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 16 65. Rienzi E, Drust B, Reilly T, et al. Investigation of anthropometric and work-rate profiles of elite South American international soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2000; 40 (2): 162-9 66. Helgerud J, Engen LC, Wisløff U, et al. Aerobic training improves soccer performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001 Nov; 33 (11): 1925-31 67. Rahnama N, Reilly T, Lees A. Injury risk associated with playing actions during competitive soccer. Br J Sports Med 2002 Oct; 36 (5): 354-9 68. Zubillaga A, Gorospe G, Mendo AH, et al. Match analysis of 2005-06 Champions League final with Amisco system [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 20 69. Odetoyinbo K, Wooster B, Lane A. The effect of a succession of matches on the activity profiles of professional soccer players [abstract no. O-021]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 16 70. Barbero-Alvarez JC, Soto VM, Barbero-Alvarez V, et al. Match analysis and heart rate of futsal players during competition. J Sports Sci 2008 Jan; 26 (1): 63-73 71. Kirkendall DT. Issues in training the female player. Br J Sports Med 2007 Aug; 41 Suppl. 1: 64-7 72. Duthie GM, Pyne DB, Marsh DJ, et al. Sprint patterns in rugby union players during competition. J Strength Cond Res 2006; Feb; 20 (1): 208-14 73. Rupf R, Thomas S, Wells G. Quantifying energy expenditure of dribbling a soccer ball in a field test [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 132 74. Bloomfield J, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. Deceleration movements performed during FA Premier League soccer matches [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 6 75. Bloomfield J, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. Turning movements performed during FA Premier League soccer matches [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 9 76. Pereira Da Silva N, Kirkendall DT, Leite De Barros Neto T. Movement patterns in elite Brazilian youth soccer. J Sports Med Phys Fit 2007; 47 (3): 270-5
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Carling et al.
77. Bangsbo J, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. J Sports Sci 2006 Jul; 24 (7): 665-74 78. Zubillaga A, Gorospel G, Mendo AH, et al. Analysis of high intensity activity in soccer highest level competition [abstract no. O-013]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 10 79. Williams A, Williams AM, Horn R. Physical and technical demands of different playing positions. Insight FA Coaches Assoc J 2003; 2 (1): 24-8 80. Rampinini E, Impellizzeri FM, Castagna C, et al. Technical performance during soccer matches of the Italian Serie A league: effect of fatigue and competitive level. J Sci Med Sport. In press 81. A´lvarez JCB, Castagna C. Activity patterns in professional futsal players using global position tracking system [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl. 10: 208 82. Carling C. Football: a game of chance or does match analysis have the answers? Insight FA Coaches Assoc 2002; 5 (3): 16-7 83. Krustrup P, Mohr M, Steensberg A, et al. Muscle and blood metabolites during a soccer game: implications for sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; Jun; 38 (6): 1165-74 84. Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, Castagna C, et al. Variation in top level soccer match performance. Int J Sports Med 2007; Dec; 28 (12): 1018-24 85. O’Donoghue PG, Tenga A. The effect of score-line on work rate in elite soccer. J Sports Sci 2001; 19 (2): 25-6 86. Bloomfield JR, Polman RCJ, O’Donoghue PG. Effects of score-line on work-rate in midfield and forward players in FA Premier League soccer. J Sports Sci 2004; 23 (2): 191-2 87. Mohr M, Krustrup P, Nybo L, et al. Muscle temperature and sprint performance during soccer matches: beneficial effects of re-warm-up at half time. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004 Jun; 15 (3): 136-43 88. Reilly T. Motion analysis and physiological demands. In: Reilly T, Williams AM, editors. Science and soccer. London: Routledge, 2003: 59-72 89. Sari-Sarraf V, Reilly T, Doran DA. Salivary IgA responses to intermittent and continuous exercise. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 849-55 90. Clarke ND, Drust B, MacLaren DPM, et al. Strategies for hydration and energy provision during soccer-specific exercise. Int J Sports Nutr Exerc Metab 2005; 15: 625-40 91. Drust B, Cable NT, Reilly T. Investigation of the effects of pre-cooling on the physiological responses to soccer-specific intermittent exercise. Eur J App Phys 2000; 81: 11-7 92. Rahnama N, Reilly T, Lees A, et al. Muscle fatigue induced by exercise simulating the work rate of competitive soccer. J Sports Sci 2003; 21: 933-42
Correspondence: Christopher Carling, LOSC Lille Me´tropole, Centre de Formation, Domain de Luchin, Grand Rue-BP79, Camphin-en-Pe´ve`le, 59780, France. E-mail:
[email protected] Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 863-878 0112-1642/08/0010-0863/$48.00/0
REVIEW ARTICLE
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes Michael J. Keogh1 and Mark E. Batt2 1 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK 2 Centre for Sports Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
Contents Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 1. Anatomy of the Hip Joint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 864 2. Specific Anatomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 2.1 The Labrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 2.2 Labral Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 865 3. Presentation of Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 3.1 History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 3.2 FAI in Sport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 3.3 Physical Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 4. Biomechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 4.1 CAM FAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 867 4.2 Pincer FAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 868 5. Pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 6. CAM Pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 870 6.1 Pincer Pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 7. Histology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 7.1 Acetabular Labrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 7.2 Cartilage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 8. Investigating FAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 8.1 Bone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 871 8.1.1 Disadvantages of CT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 8.2 Imaging Labrum and Cartilage in FAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 873 8.3 Diagnostic Arthroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 9. Treatment Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 9.1 Conservative Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 9.2 Operative Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 9.2.1 Open. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 874 9.2.2 Arthroscopic Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 10. Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875
Keogh & Batt
864
Abstract
There are a multitude of well recognized hip and groin injuries that commonly affect athletes; however, a more recently recognized and possibly often overlooked cause of hip pain is that of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). FAI is characterized by abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabular rim, which may occur by two mechanisms known as ‘CAM’ or ‘pincer’ impingement, although most commonly by a mixture of both. CAM impingement is characterized by abutment of the femoral neck against the acetabulum due to a morphological abnormality of the femoral head-neck junction. Pincer impingement occurs where an abnormality of the acetabulum results in impingement against an often normal femoral neck. Both CAM and pincer impingement are known to result in pathological consequences of cartilage delamination and labral lesions, leading to significant pain and disruption to athletic performance and activities of daily living in athletes. There are currently several methods of assessing the degree of impingement by use of CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans, which can be used in conjunction with magnetic resonance arthrography and arthroscopy to assess the damage caused to the underlying structures of the hip. Both open and arthroscopic surgical methods are used, with recent reports in athletes showing excellent results for lifestyle improvement and frequency of returning to sport. In cases of hip and groin pain in athletes, it is important to remember to look for typical history, and examination and imaging findings that may suggest a diagnosis of hip impingement. This article goes some way to explaining the principles, consequences and management of FAI.
Hip and groin injuries are suggested to account for 5–6% of all adult athletic injuries and are a significant cause of morbidity in athletes. Conditions such as myositis ossificans, piriformis syndrome, stress fractures, strains and snapping hip are established and well reported causes of such athletic injuries. However, although first reported in 1957,[1] we are currently seeing greater reporting of acetabular labral tears and intra-articular cartilage damage in athletes, and a cause of both these problems is femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). FAI, as explained in detail in section 4, has two different aetiologies, termed ‘CAM’ and ‘pincer’ impingement, which may occur together or in isolation. CAM impingement is primarily an abnormality of the femoral head-neck junction, whereas the pincer type is principally an ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
abnormality of the acetabulum causing impingement against the femoral neck. Both of these subtypes vary slightly in their pathological consequences, but both have been shown to cause cartilage delamination, labral tears, and have been linked to early osteoarthritis of the hip.[2-4] 1. Anatomy of the Hip Joint The hip joint is a ball and socket joint consisting of the femoral head and the acetabulum of the pelvis, and enables a wide range of movement with three degrees of freedom. Articular cartilage, composed predominantly of type II collagen, covers the vast majority of the femoral head. The articular surface of the acetabulum is also composed of articular cartilage distributed Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
Head of femur Ilium Ant. inf. iliac spine Spine of ischium
Fovea capitis Ligamentum teres Isc
hiu
m
Pubis
Iliofemoral ligament
Lesser trochanter Femur
Fig. 1. Lateral diagram of the hip joint. Reproduced from the 39th edition of Gray’s Anatomy[5] (Churchill Livingstone), with permission. Copyright ª Elsevier 2004. Ant. inf. = anterior inferior.
acetabulum and runs circumferentially around its periphery. The labrum ceases at the lower edge of the acetabulum, but the ring is completed by the transverse ligament of the acetabulum, which acts as a heavy fibrous band in continuity with the labrum. The distal free edge of the labrum is narrower than its insertion to the acetabulum, creating a triangular cross-section. It functions to enable the acetabulum to cup slightly more than half of the sphere of the femoral head. The labrum has several surfaces with varying characteristics in the hip joint. The external surface is in contact with the joint capsule, an internal surface, which is involved in articulation with the femoral head, and the previously mentioned proximal attachment to the acetabular rim. The distal edge defines the outer limit of the acetabulum. 2.2 Labral Function
The acetabular labrum is similar in structure to the glenoid labrum of the shoulder, and both
Capsular ligament
Acetabulum
around its periphery. The central acetabular floor is non-articular, being a fatty layer, and is termed the pulvinar. The ligamentum teres joins the femoral head to the acetabulum, and may play a role in maintaining joint stability. Circumferentially around the acetabulum lies the acetabular labrum, which is discussed in more detail in section 2.1, and is important to an understanding of FAI (figure 1 and figure 2). Three major ligaments surround the hip joint capsule. Anteriorly lies the iliofemoral ligament, which tightens on hip extension. Inferomedially lies the pubofemoral ligament, the weakest, which tightens in hip extension and abduction. Finally, the ischiofemoral ligament runs horizontally and posteriorly, its fibres tightening with hip extension and limiting internal rotation.
865
Cotyloid ligament Capsular ligament Ligamentum teres
2. Specific Anatomy 2.1 The Labrum
The acetabular labrum is a fibrocartilagenous rim, which is attached to the bony edge of the ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Fig. 2. Anterior angle diagram of the bones and ligaments of the hip joint. Reproduced from the 39th edition of Gray’s Anatomy[5] (Churchill Livingstone), with permission. Copyright ª Elsevier 2004.
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Keogh & Batt
866
act to deepen the respective depths of their socket. However, the deepening effect of the acetabular labrum is thought to be less important than its effect of enhancing stability by providing a negative intra-articular pressure within the hip joint during joint distraction.[6] In 1995, Kim and Azuma[7] suggested that the acetabulum was involved in nocioception and proprioception after analysing 23 human cadaveric labrums, and more recently, work has looked at the involvement of the acetabular labrum in fluid pressurization. Ferguson et al.[8,9] showed that in the absence of an intact labrum, hydrostatic pressures within the joint decreased, also affecting joint lubrication within the hip joint. Hence, the labrum can be thought of as acting to prevent damage to the articular cartilage by sealing the joint and preventing fluid loss.[10] However, it should be noted that in 1998, Konrath et al.[11] showed that in cadaveric hips in which the labrums had been removed, no appreciable change with regard to contact area, load or mean pressure could be noted after removal of the labrum. 3. Presentation of Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) 3.1 History
FAI usually presents in young and middle-aged adults, typically men, with insidious onset groin pain that may be preceded by minor trauma, although many patients will report no history of any specific precipitating factor. During the early stages, the pain is intermittent and may be exacerbated by physical activities and exercise, and hence, a misdiagnosis of hip or groin pain of soft-tissue origin may occur. The pain experienced may also be brought on by prolonged sitting. An incorrect diagnosis at this stage may then lead to several weeks or months of inappropriate management. 3.2 FAI in Sport
Although FAI is a relatively recent concept, there is a growing body of evidence to support this ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
condition as an established cause of hip and groin pain in athletes. FAI is a process by which morphological abnormalities of the hip causes damage to the surrounding acetabular labrum and cartilage of the hip.[12,13] With regard to sport, it has been known since 1979 that bony abnormaalities of the femoral neck cause hip pain in athletes,[14] and more recently, FAI has been shown to be a major source of hip pain, decreased range of movement and reduced performance in athletes.[15] The aetiology of the condition is still unclear, and it remains to be seen whether certain sports induce femoral neck abnormality through osteophyte-type formation or simply exaggerate a problem by utilizing specific ranges of motion, crucially that of internal rotation whilst in hip flexion (e.g. hockey goalkeeping stance). The pain exhibited on internal rotation in flexion in patients with FAI is due to the abutment and impingement of the femoral neck against the acetabular labrum, and it could be postulated that sports in which this mechanism is utilized would be in those in which FAI is most common, such as hockey, tennis, martial arts, weight lifting, soccer and horse riding. There are very few published data demonstrating the prevalence of FAI in the general population, but studies such as that by Murray[16] in 1971 showed that what we now know to be the ‘CAM’ type FAI was probably present in 24% of high-activity athletes, which is higher than the estimated 10–15% prevalence in the general population.[12] It is also known that conditions such as malunion of femoral neck fractures can be related to sport[17] and lead to CAM impingement.[18,19] These figures give rise to the possibility that certain sports increase the risk of developing the condition, not simply of becoming symptomatic, and also may explain why young men are most at risk for this condition. It is important to note the severe impact that this condition may have on athletes. Reports describe significant impairment in activities of Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
daily living,[15] together with severe limitations in sporting activities, particularly high-demand sports involving cutting or sprinting. In these activities, 88% of athletes reported moderate to total inability to perform. Bizzini et al.[20] reported that the loss of range of motion (ROM) in hip rotation, especially internal rotation, was the main performance-limiting factor in their study. It is therefore important that FAI becomes a more widely appreciated cause of hip pain, especially in sports involving internal rotation in flexion, and should be considered as a cause of hip and groin pain in these athletes. Thus, this article focuses on the underlying pathology, clinical assessment, and radiographic and diagnostic imaging findings.
867
that hip flexion on the affected side was 91 less than the opposite limb, together with mean reductions of adduction (31 less), and internal rotation (41 less). They also showed that the impingement test was positive in 99% of athletes, and the FABER (Flexion ABduction and External Rotation) test was positive in 97%. Although anterior impingement is common, pincer impingement (posteroinferior lesions) is also often found; however, the most common pathology is often reported to be a combination of the two.[12] To test for posteroinferior impingement, the patient lies supine and extends their leg over the edge of the examination couch. The physician then provides external rotation of the hip whilst the leg is extended, which will reproduce their symptoms of groin pain should a posteroinferior lesion be present (figure 3).
3.3 Physical Examination
Hip impingement tests in patients with FAI have been shown to be almost always positive, and are therefore of paramount importance to evaluation.[15,21,22] The use of these tests in hip examination should help lead to an earlier diagnosis of FAI. This is clinically relevant, as Philippon et al.[15] recently described that the average time from onset of symptoms to treatment in a cohort of athletes was 29.6 months, and Bizzini et al.[20] reported an average time of 13 months in athletes. The impingement test is performed with the patient lying supine, as the physician adducts and flexes the affected hip to 901 whilst gently internally rotating, thus causing the femoral neck to abut against the acetabular rim. Additional internal rotation in this position will cause a sharp pain if a labral, chondral or both types of lesion are present.[22] Thus, limitation of internal rotation and pain at end range are critical to the early diagnosis of this condition. A positive impingement test is the common sole clinical finding of the CAM type impingement (anterosuperior lesion). Recently, Philippon et al.[21] reported their examination findings of the clinical presentations of FAI, which showed ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
4. Biomechanics
4.1 CAM FAI
It has also been suggested that FAI may occur with a femoral head-neck junction that is morphologically and anatomically normal, but in these instances, impingement occurs as a result of excessive and extreme ranges of motion.[23] This may well be the case in some athletes, and is possibly related to hyperextensibility, which may be deemed advantageous in certain sports. There are, however, several other predisposing conditions that may result in an anatomical deformity of the femoral head-neck, resulting in anterior or CAM impingement. Conditions such as rotational malunion due to previous femoral neck fracture,[18] flattening of the femoral head due to femoral head necrosis,[24] and posterior tilt of the femoral head due to slipped capital femoral epiphysis[25] have all been implicated as causes of FAI, as well as iatrogenic causes such as femoral osteotomies, where there is a reduction in joint clearance post-operatively (figures 4-7). Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Keogh & Batt
868
Fig. 3. Images of the impingement test from two angles. The affected leg is flexed, adducted and internally rotated, causing the abnormal anterolateral portion of the femoral head-neck junction to abut against the acetabular rim. This causes pain and is therefore a positive impingement test in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
4.2 Pincer FAI
In cases of pincer impingement, the femoral head may be morphologically normal; however, abutment results from an acetabular abnormality. A common cause is acetabular overcoverage of the femoral head known as coxa profunda. In this instance, the centre-edge or ‘Wiberg’s’ angle, which measures the lateral covering of the femoral head by the acetabular roof is greater than 401[28] with a normal range for adults stated as being 20–461[29] (figure 8). Other causes of pincer impingement are protrusio acetabuli, in which the medial wall of the acetabulum invades the pelvic cavity with associated medial displacement of the femoral head. This is associated with a variety of conditions, most noticeably Marfan’s syndrome.[30,31] Again, Wiberg’s angle is greater than 401, ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
and other features, such as crossing of the ilioischial line by the acetabular line, occur medially.[32]
Fig. 4. Diagram of a normal hip joint with normal contours and anatomy (reproduced from Lavigne et al.,[26] with permission).
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
Fig. 5. Diagram of a hip with CAM impingement. Shaded area of increased bony excrescence resulting in reduced femoral head-neck offset – CAM impingement (reproduced from Lavigne et al.,[26] with permission).
Another cause of pincer impingement is thought to be acetabular retroversion, in which the acetabulum is posteriorly orientated with reference to the sagittal plane.[33] It may be an isolated abnormality, or associated with other developmental abnormalities and, whilst initially recognized as a cause of hip pain, is now thought to be a cause of FAI.
869
Fig. 7. Abutment of the labrum: when in flexion, the reduced headneck offset comes into contact with the acetabular labrum, causing labral and articular damage (reproduced from Beck et al.,[27] with permission).
In cases of pincer impingement, continued impaction of the acetabular rim against the femoral head is thought to induce degeneration of the labrum and eventual ossification of the acetabular rim, which leads effectively to a further deepening of the acetabulum and worsening overcoverage. This results in both anterior im-
30˚
E
C2
Fig. 6. Diagram of CAM impingement in extension. This diagram shows that the section of the femoral neck with reduced head-neck offset is not impinging on the acetabular labrum in this position (reproduced from Beck et al.,[27] with permission).
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
C1
Fig. 8. Diagram of centre-edge (CE) or Wiberg’s angle. The vertical line is perpendicular to the horizontal line extending between the centre of each femoral head (C1 and C2). The edge (E) point is the most lateral point of the acetabulum. The CE (Wiberg’s) angle is measured between the vertical line passing through C1 and C2 and E.
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Keogh & Batt
870
pingement and often an additional posteroinferior lesion due to an affective leverage of the femoral head, resulting in what Parvizi and Ganz[23] called a ‘contre-coup’ lesion of the cartilage in the posteroinferior acetabulum (figures 9-11). 5. Pathology The biomechanics described in section 4 explain how FAI may damage the acetabular labrum and cartilage. Acetabular labral disorders have been linked to being a source of hip pain[2,7,34] and have also been linked to the development of osteoarthritis of the hip.[2,35,36] 6. CAM Pathology In CAM impingement, Beck et al.[12] showed that separation of the acetabular cartilage from the labrum occurs in the anterosuperior region, which has also been shown to be the most common site of injury in several other studies.[22,27,37-40] In the study by Beck et al.,[12] all patients with a pure CAM impingement showed cartilage damage in the antero-superior area, maximal at the 1 o’clock position to a mean depth of 11 mm, which is roughly one-third of the depth of the cartilage at this point.
Fig. 10. Diagram of pincer impingement in normal extension. In normal extension, there is no abutment of the overcoverage against the femoral head-neck junction (reproduced from Beck et al.,[27] with permission).
The pathological findings can be explained by looking at the structure of the normal acetabulum. In a normal hip, the acetabular labrum merges with the acetabular cartilage through a transition zone of roughly 1–2 mm,[39] but in all patients with CAM impingement, separation of the acetabular cartilage from the labrum was seen. As the labrum has a stable fixation to the acetabular rim, it appears that the abutment of the ‘CAM’ causes a pathological under-surface separation of cartilage from labrum across this ‘transition zone’. 6.1 Pincer Pathology
Fig. 9. Diagram of acetabular overcoverage causing pincer impingement. The shaded area shows acetabular overcoverage of the femoral head, deepening the acetabulum-pincer impingement (reproduced from Lavigne et al.,[26] with permission).
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
In cases of a pincer FAI, a more circumferential pattern of disease[12] has been noted, and this type of impingement may help to explain why additional posterior lesions have been noted on arthroscopy in previous studies of labral tears.[41,42] Labral lesions were shown to be maximal between the 11 and 1 o’clock positions, although maximal cartilage damage was seen at the 12 o’clock position, with the mean depth of the cartilage lesion being 4 mm.[12] Beck et al.[12] also Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
871
matrix with no signs of inflammation. This shows that FAI is a chronic process that gradually produces a degenerative reaction at the site of impingement. Ironically, Ito et al.[43] expected to see more extensive labral tip involvement in the pincer group, due to the ‘bumper’ effect of the femoral neck against the labrum; however, this was not evident in their study. Furthermore, if discovered early, the lack of labral tip involvement provides the potential for labral reattachment with surgical intervention. 7.2 Cartilage Fig. 11. Pincer impingement in flexion showing abutment of the labrum against the femoral neck, and as the femoral head is levered out by the acetabulum, a posterior ‘contre-coup’ lesion also occurs (reproduced from Beck et al.,[27] with permission).
showed that 31% of pincer-impinged patients showed posteroinferior roughening of the femoral head, and 62% had cartilage damage posteroinferiorly. Again, this is due to posterior subluxation of the femoral head once further flexion occurs on an already impinging anterosuperior rim. Seldes et al.[39] also showed endochrondral ossification within the labrum, and Beck et al.[12] proposed that repeated microtrauma induces bone growth at the base of the labrum, further deepening the acetabulum and compounding the problem.
7. Histology 7.1 Acetabular Labrum
The normal acetabular labrum is composed of circumferential collagen fibres running parallel to the acetabular rim, together with small, flat, inactive fibroblasts. Studies have shown that aging produces labral tears with internal cleavage being demonstrated on histological examination.[39] Conversely, labral histological examination from patients with FAI showed no mechanical lesions in the matrix, and samples were consistent with a chronic degenerative process,[43] showing only a thickened and disorganized, occasionally cystic ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Cartilage in patients with FAI has been shown to be coarse with relatively low levels of proteoglycans. The heterotrophic bone shows large amounts of unmineralized osteoid formation with pseudocysts, attributable to increased osteoblastic activity at the site.[43] 8. Investigating FAI 8.1 Bone
Routine radiographic evaluation of potential FAI in an athlete should include an anteroposterior view of the pelvis with the patient lying supine with the leg in 151 of internal rotation.[44] The radiographer should then provide an image with a film focus distance of 1.2 m with the central beam directed to the mid-point between both anterior superior iliac spines and the superior border of the pubic symphysis.[44,45] For the cross-table lateral view, the leg should be internally rotated, with a film distance of 1.2 m and the beam directed at the inguinal fold.[46] An alternative view is that of a Dunn/Rippstein, where the hip is placed in 451 of flexion to show anterior femoral head-neck junction abnormalities.[47] The anteroposterior radiograph may show a reduced head-neck offset, or herniation pits, both of which have been linked to FAI.[23] It may also show the previously discussed specific deformities on x-ray such as pistol grip,[48,49] tilt[16] or Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
872
subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis[49] on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, as well as other conditions associated with FAI, such as coxa profunda, protrusion acetabuli, coxa vara or extreme coxa valga. However, although any of the causes of FAI listed above may be seen on normal radiographs, many causes may also be missed[3,16,49-51] because their pathology appears to be absent in the frontal/coronal plane. It is therefore very important to obtain lateral films (figure 12a and 12b).
Fig. 12. (a) Left hip radiograph of a young girl with CAM impingement. Out of round bump on the head overloads the acetabular cartilage as it is rotated into the joint (arrow). (b) Right hip radiograph showing pincer impingement. Shortened head-neck offset abuts the rim of the acetabulum (lower arrow), eventually causing ossification of the labrum, which then looks similar to a shear-type fracture (upper arrow) [reproduced from Sampson,[52] with permission. Copyright ª Elsevier 2005].
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Keogh & Batt
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also now commonly used in the evaluation of the painful non-arthritic hip,[53,54] and several methods of identifying FAI using MRI[3,50,55] and CT[56] have been developed, which also enable a quantifiable assessment of the deformity. An early method was developed by Ito et al.,[3] who used a 1.5T MRI scanner after intra-articular injection of gadalonium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid[37] in the symptomatic hip to analyse 24 patients with positive impingement tests. They used fast low angled shot (FLASH) sequences and coronal oblique sections through the femoral head to show that patients with FAI had no difference in the mean angle of the femoral neck, but did have a significant reduction in femoral anteversion and head-neck offset in the anterior aspect of the femoral neck compared with controls. In 2002, Notzli et al.[50] developed a method of accurately measuring the anterior margin of the waist of the femoral neck and produced an angle, the alpha angle, using 39 patients with groin pain and positive impingement tests. Images were obtained using a 1T MRI scanner with a flexible transmit/receive surface coil after an MR contrast injection. Again, FLASH sequences were used, this time parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, passing through the centre of the femoral head, giving a view corresponding to a lateral radiograph with the plate parallel to the femoral neck. They showed that in patients with FAI, the alpha angle was an average of 741 compared with 421 for the control group, and defined an alpha angle of greater than 501 as potentially abnormal. CT is well established in the assessment of orthopaedic abnormalities of the hip,[57-59] and provides a better image of the bony contour due to the transparency of soft tissues on this modality. In 2001,[60] multi-dimensional image post-processing was used to determine the femoral neck axis to a higher degree of accuracy than previous conventional 2-dimensional CT, which had limitations in identifying subtle contours of the femoral head-neck axis.[13] Beaule at al.[56] have also used 3-dimensional CT to assess the Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
anterior and posterior concavity of the femoral head-neck junction in 30 patients (36 hips) with a positive impingement sign. They measured the alpha angle, showing that mean alpha angle in the symptomatic group was 66.41 versus 43.81 (p = 0.001). They also showed that symptomatic males had significantly greater alpha angles than symptomatic females (73.8 vs 58.7; p = 0.009). 8.1.1 Disadvantages of CT
CT scanning should be used judiciously as it puts patients at an increased risk of radiation compared with MRI. The dose of radiation from a CT pelvis is approximately 9 mSv, which is roughly equivalent to 3 years’ natural background radiation.[61] The radiation dose does vary across institutions and should be minimized to enhance the risk-benefit ratio that CT provides for superior bone imaging[62] (figure 13). 8.2 Imaging Labrum and Cartilage in FAI
Initially, it was thought that MRI would accurately assess and diagnose labral tears. MRI features suggestive of a labral tear include a thickened labrum with no recesses, an irregularly shaped or non-triangular labrum, a labrum with
Alpha angle
Fig. 13. CT measurement of alpha angle. A perfect circle was centred over the acetabular segment of the femoral head. The alpha angle was drawn from the transition of the head into the neck where the neck radius exceeds the head radius. The neck axis was made parallel to the anterior femoral neck cortex in line with the head centre (reproduced from Beaule et al.,[56] with permission of WileyLiss, Inc., a subsidiary of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
873
increased signal intensities on T1 imaging, or detachment.[63] As a result of the tendency of the joint capsule to collapse against the acetabular rim, initial studies showed considerable difficulty in distinguishing discrete labral tears on MRI;[64,65] however, a recent study by James et al.[66] had excellent results using MRI scans in patients with FAI, detecting 100% of labral tears and between 89% and 94% of articular cartilage damage. They stated and highlighted the importance of using a surface coil in routine hip imaging. MR arthrography is an alternative and complimentary method of demonstrating cartilage and bony abnormalities within the hip joint[67] and is an accurate method of diagnosing and assessing tears in the acetabular labrum.[37,65,68] A joint effusion may improve delineation of intra-articular structures[69] by increasing the distance between these structures, and thus may be deemed helpful. Kassarjian et al.[70] assessed the triad of headneck morphology, cartilage and labral abnormalities in 42 hips of CAM type FAI using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRa). In their study, a 1.5T MRI scanner (with a torso or cardiac coil) was used to image the affected hip whilst the patient was supine, with the leg in slight internal rotation to bring the femoral neck into the coronal plane. Their study showed that of the 42 hips studied, all had a labral abnormality, 40 had a cartilage abnormality and 37 had all three (cartilage, labral and head-neck) abnormalities. A study by Czerny et al.[65] demonstrated that of 22 hips that underwent surgery for a labral tear diagnosed by MRa, 20 (91%) were accurately diagnosed. In a subsequent study by Leunig et al.,[37] 18 of 21 (86%) patients who had surgery for a labral tear had the correct preoperative diagnosis based on MRa. However, recent non-arthrographic MRI studies, such as that of James et al.,[66] have shown slightly better results than those of MRa for the detection of labral tears and intra-articular cartilage damage; thus, it remains to be seen whether the arthrogram component remains necessary. Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Keogh & Batt
874
8.3 Diagnostic Arthroscopy
Intra-articular hip injuries in athletes can cause significant functional disability and can ultimately be career ending. Arthroscopy enables direct observation of the joint and thus enhances diagnostic specificity. Arthroscopy of the hip has lagged behind that of the other joints, probably because of its technical challenges and previously perceived difficulties.[71] However, the technique is becoming increasingly adopted and is now regarded as an accepted or ‘gold standard’ of care.[72] Several authors have used diagnostic arthroscopy as their principle method of diagnosis of acetabular labral tears[73,74] despite the possible complication rate of 1.6–5%, which is mainly related to the traction forces applied, such as transient neuropraxis and fluid extravasation.[75] A study in 1999 of 328 patients by Baber et al.[76] showed that using hip arthroscopy altered the diagnosis in 53% of patients with hip pain, and the most commonly missed defects were osteoarthritis, osteochondral defects, labral tears and loose bodies. Their overall conclusions were that hip arthroscopy was a useful diagnostic tool in assessing and treating the adult patient with an uncertain cause of hip pain postMRI scan. However, as discussed above, the improvements in MR imaging may challenge the role for diagnostic arthroscopy in these patients.[37,65,66] 9. Treatment Options A synopsis of the current treatment possibilities for FAI is outlined below. 9.1 Conservative Treatment
A trial of activity modification, particularly a reduction of excessive end-range movements, together with appropriate anti-inflammatory medications and analgesics may reduce the pain. For some athletes, this may require specific technique modification with associated muscle balance work. Indeed, an initial period of conservative ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
management is recommended, recognizing that many athletes may subsequently need surgical intervention. 9.2 Operative Treatment
The aim of surgery is to increase the clearance between the femoral head and the acetabulum to alleviate the abutment and halt the process of chondral and labral damage. Both open[27,38] and arthroscopic techniques[77-79] have been developed to improve hip clearance. 9.2.1 Open CAM
Open procedures involving surgical dislocation for FAI have long been recommended to provide a full and unobstructed view of the femoral head and acetabulum.[26] For CAM impingement with a non-spherical femoral head, surgical dislocation of the femoral head is performed,[80] followed by excision osteoplasty of small ‘sleeves’ of bone from the impinging section of the femoral head. Varying amounts of the anterolateral portion of the femoral headneck junction can be removed to alleviate the symptoms; however, removing more than 30% results in an increased rate of fracture in response to axial loading,[81] and is therefore to be avoided. Pincer
If the abnormality lies with the acetabulum, then a resection osteoplasty of the excessive acetabular rim may be undertaken, or the retroverted acetabulum may be reoriented by periacetabular osteotomy.[82] The side effects of open surgical dislocations have been shown to include post-operative stiffness, heterotrophic ossification, and sciatic nerve neuropraxis,[18] and thus it is not without significant risk. The post-operative management of patients undergoing these procedures involves approximately 6–8 weeks of ambulation with a toe-touch weight-bearing programme, with hip flexion Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
limited to 701.[26] After this phase, several phases involving controlled ambulation and ROM exercises have been used, with a view to returning to sport from 25 weeks post-operatively.[20] Only a few studies have reported the outcomes of open surgical procedures for FAI[27,38] with typically good results, but only recently have functional outcomes been assessed in athletes, showing a return to high-level sport in hockey players roughly 9 months after surgery,[20] which is promising.
9.2.2 Arthroscopic Treatment
Arthroscopic techniques for treating the CAM and/or pincer bony deformity, as well as repairing the resultant damage of the cartilage and labrum, have been described,[77-79] and the use of these techniques appears to be rapidly increasing. This procedure requires specific positioning of the patient in a modified supine position, with traction then applied to the break the vacuum of the hip joint prior to portal placement. First, the intra-articular pathology, such as chondral defects or labral repairs, is addressed. Following this, an osteoplasty is performed. For pincer impingement, there are three different methods described depending on the extent of overhang, the details of which are beyond the scope of this article. Post-operative management of arthroscopic treatment for FAI typically involves 4–8 weeks of 20 lbs (~9 kg) of flat foot weight bearing, with specific foot boots worn at night for 10 days to limit hip rotation,[79] with or without the use of a modified hip brace. The initial results of patients treated for FAI by arthroscopic surgery from both Sampson[52] and Guanche and Bare[83] were encouraging. Also, Philippon et al.[15] recently described their experiences with professional athletes, and reported 93% returning to professional sport after the procedure and 78% remaining active in professional sports 1.6 years later after arthroscopic decompression of their FAI. ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
875
10. Conclusion The diagnosis and management of groin pain in athletes can be challenging, and FAI should be considered in the differential diagnosis, especially in those athletes participating in sports that involve internal rotation and loading in hip flexion. History and careful physical examination, especially the importance of incorporating hip impingement tests will go some way to establishing a diagnosis in many of these athletes. Emerging methods of imaging are becoming of paramount importance in determining the effects and degree of impingement. As both open and arthroscopic surgical procedures continue to improve, it is important that the diagnosis of FAI is established to reduce morbidity in these patients and athletes. Acknowledgements No funding was provided for the preparation of this paper, and the authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this review.
References 1. Paterson I. The torn acetabular labrum; a block to reduction of a dislocated hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1957; 39-B (2): 306-9 2. McCarthy JC, Nobel PC, Schuck MR, et al. The Otto E. Aufranc Award: the role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (393): 25-37 3. Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (2): 171-6 4. Leunig M, Beck M, Woo A, et al. Acetabular rim degeneration: a constant finding in the aged hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (413): 201-7 5. Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy. 39th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2004 6. Takechi H, Nagashima H, Ito S. Intra-articular pressure of the hip joint outside and inside the limbus. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1982; 56 (6): 529-36 7. Kim YT, Azuma H. The nerve endings of the acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (320): 176-81 8. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, et al. The acetabular labrum seal: a poroelastic finite element model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000; 15 (6): 463-8
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
876
9. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, et al. The influence of the acetabular labrum on hip joint cartilage consolidation: a poroelastic finite element model. J Biomech 2000; 33 (8): 953-60 10. Ferguson SJ, Bryant JT, Ganz R, et al. An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics. J Biomech 2003; 36 (2): 171-8 11. Konrath GA, Konrath GA, Hamel AJ, et al. The role of the acetabular labrum and the transverse acetabular ligament in load transmission in the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (12): 1781-8 12. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, et al. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (7): 1012-8 13. Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, et al. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14 (1): 48-53 14. Demarais Y. La hanche du sportif. Gaz Med France 1979; 86: 2969-72 15. Philippon M, Schenker M, Briggs K, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement in 45 professional athletes: associated pathologies and return to sport following arthroscopic decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (7): 908-14 16. Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol 1965; 38 (455): 810-24 17. Kang L, Belcher D, Hulstyn MJ. Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in women’s college lacrosse: a report of seven cases and a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39 (12): 902-6 18. Eijer H, Myers SR, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15 (7): 475-81 19. Bettin D, Pankalla T, Bo¨hm H, et al. Hip pain related to femoral neck stress fracture in a 12-year-old boy performing intensive soccer playing activities: a case report. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24 (8): 593-6 20. Bizzini M, Notzli HP, Maffiuletti NA. Femoroacetabular impingement in professional ice hockey players: a case series of 5 athletes after open surgical decompression of the hip. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (11): 1955-9 21. Philippon MJ, Maxwell RB, Johnston TL, et al. Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (8): 1041-7 22. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (417): 112-20 23. Parvizi J, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement. Semin Arthroplasty 2005; 16: 33-7 24. Kloen P, Leunig M, Ganz R. Early lesions of the labrum and acetabular cartilage in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (1): 66-9 25. Rab T. The geometry of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: implications for movement, impingement, and corrective osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19 (4): 419-24
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Keogh & Batt
26. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418): 61-6 27. Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, et al. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418): 67-73 28. Lequesne M, Morvan G. Description of the potential of an arthrometer for standard and reduced radiographs suitable to measurement of angles and segments of hip, knee, foot and joint space widths. Joint Bone Spine 2002; 69 (3): 282-92 29. Fredensborg N. The CE angle of normal hips. Acta Orthop Scand 1976; 47 (4): 403-5 30. Hohle B. Familial occurrence of protrusio acetabuli [in German]. Beitr Orthop Traumatol 1978; 25 (5): 261-5 31. Van de Velde S, Fillman SR, Yandow S. Current concepts review: protrusion acetabuli in Marfan syndrome: history, diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (3): 639-46 32. Armbuster TG, Guerra Jr J, Resnick D, et al. The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology 1978; 128 (1): 1-10 33. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (B): 281-8 34. Fitzgerald RH. Acetabular labrum tears: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (311): 60-8 35. Altenberg AR. Acetabular labrum tears: a cause of hip pain and degenerative arthritis. South Med J 1977; 70 (2): 174-5 36. Harris WH, Bourne RB, Oh I. Intra-articular acetabular labrum: a possible etiological factor in certain cases of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (4): 510-4 37. Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersbo¨ck A, et al. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (2): 230-4 38. Murphy S, Tannast M, Kim YJ, et al. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429): 178-81 39. Seldes RM, Tan V, Hunt J, et al. Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (382): 232-40 40. Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 370-5 41. Hase T, Ueo T. Acetabular labral tear: arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy 1999; 15 (2): 138-41 42. Ikeda T, Awaya G, Suzuki S, et al. Torn acetabular labrum in young patients. Arthroscopic diagnosis and management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (1): 13-6 43. Ito K, Leunig M, Ganz R. Histopathologic features of the acetabular labrum in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429): 262-71
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
A Review of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes
44. Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, et al. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior x-rays: a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35 (3): 149-55 45. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis: what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (6): 1540-52 46. Eijer H, Mahomed MN, Ganz R. Crosstable lateral radiograph for screening of an anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int 2001; 11: 37-41 47. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 445: 181-5 48. Stulberg SD. Unrecognized childhood hip disease: a major cause of idiopathic osteoarthritis of the hip. In: Cordell LD, Harris WH, Ramsey PL, et al., editors. Proceedings of the Third Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis (MO): Mosby, 1975: 212-28 49. Goodman DA, Feighan JE, Smith AD, et al. Subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Relationship to osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79 (10): 1489-97 50. Notzli H, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, et al. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 87-B: 1012-8 51. Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ, Houston CS. Minor anatomic abnormalities of the hip joint persisting from childhood and their possible relationship to idiopathic osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (264): 122-8 52. Sampson TG. Hip morphology and its relationship to pathology: dysplasia to impingement. Tech Sports Med 2005; 13: 37-45 53. Edwards DJ, Lomas D, Villar RN. Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77 (3): 374-6 54. Recht M, Bobic V, Burstein D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (391 Suppl.): S379-96 55. Siebenrock KA, Wahab KH, Werlen S, et al. Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418): 54-60 56. Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 2005; 23 (6): 1286-92 57. Gelberman RH, Cohen MS, Desai SS, et al. Femoral anteversion: a clinical assessment of idiopathic intoeing gait in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69 (1): 75-9 58. Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54 (1): 18-23 59. Reikeras O, Hoiseth A. Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53 (5): 781-4
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
877
60. Kordelle J, Millis M, Jolesz FA, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21 (2): 179-82 61. Aldrich JE, Mayo JR. Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia. Can Assoc Radiol J 2006; 57 (2): 79-85 62. Moss M, McLean D. Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia. Australas Radiol 2006; 50 (1): 33-40 63. Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Tai CC, et al. Acetabular labrum and its tears. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37 (3): 207-11 64. Aydingoz U, Ozturk MH. MR imaging of the acetabular labrum: a comparative study of both hips in 180 asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 (4): 567-74 65. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A, et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 1996; 200 (1): 225-30 66. James SL, Ali K, Malara F, et al. MRI findings of femoroacetabular impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (6): 1412-9 67. Schmid MR, No¨tzli HP, Zanetti M, et al. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. Radiology 2003; 226 (2): 382-6 68. Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, et al. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1996; 200 (1): 231-5 69. Palmer WE. MR arthrography of the hip. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1998; 2 (4): 349-62 70. Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, et al. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 2005; 236 (2): 588-92 71. Burman M. Arthroscopy or the direct visualisation of joints: an experimental cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg 1931; 23: 669-95 72. Glick JM, Sampson TG, Gordon RB, et al. Hip arthroscopy by the lateral approach. Arthroscopy 1987; 3 (1): 4-12 73. Lage LA, Patel JV, Villar RN. The acetabular labral tear: an arthroscopic classification. Arthroscopy 1996; 12 (3): 269-72 74. McCarthy JC, Busconi B. The role of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of hip disease. Orthopedics 1995; 18 (8): 753-6 75. Sampson TG. Complications of hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med 2001; 20 (4): 831-5 76. Baber YF, Robinson AH, Villar RN. Is diagnostic arthroscopy of the hip worthwhile? A prospective review of 328 adults investigated for hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (4): 600-3 77. Sampson TG. Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Tech Orthop 2005; 20: 56-62 78. Weiland D, Philippon M. Arthroscopic technique of femoroacetabular impingement. Oper Techniques Orthop 2005; 15: 256-60 79. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML. Arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25 (2): 299-308, ix
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
878
80. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (8): 1119-24 81. Mardones RM, Gonzalez C, Chen Q, et al. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (2): 273-9 82. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion:
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Keogh & Batt
treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (2): 278-86 83. Guanche CA, Bare A. Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (1): 95-106
Correspondence: Dr Mark E. Batt, Centre for Sports Medicine, West Block, Queen’s Medical Centre, C Floor, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 879 0112-1642/08/0010-0879/$48.00/0
CORRESPONDENCE
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Warm-Up and Stretching in the Prevention of Muscular Injury I recently read the article by Woods et al.[1] with interest. There are a couple of issues that require clarification. First, the authors appear to have missed several articles cited in other reviews.[2,3] More importantly, the authors fail to distinguish between studies that examined stretching immediately prior to exercise (e.g. Pope et al.[4]) from those that examined stretching at other times (e.g. Hartig and Henderson[5]), or that included multiple interventions (e.g. Bixler and Jones[6]). For a variety of reasons described elsewhere, there are strong theoretical reasons to believe that stretching before exercise is not the same intervention as stretching at other times. In brief, one could use the analogy of weight lifting. An acute bout of weight lifting causes a decrease in measured force similar to an acute bout of stretching. A long-term weight-training programme produces an increase in force, similar to a long-term programme of stretching. Therefore, one would expect injury rates to be different depending on the timing of the intervention. Although there are not many studies on the long-term effects of stretching, the clinical evidence suggests that this may indeed be the case. Secondly, a focus on only muscle injuries and excluding other types of injuries is not advisable because the effects of stretching are not limited to muscle. If stretching affects neuromuscular function, one would expect an increase in falls or collisions and the injury may not necessarily occur at the muscle level. Therefore, the intervention could decrease (or increase) muscle injuries and have the opposite effect for total injuries. In other medical areas, difficult lessons were learned when investigators focused only on disease-specific outcomes and pronounced beneficial effects of medications, and later found that overall mortality increased because of unanticipated effects. Finally, the authors suggest that long-term stretching may increase the length of the muscle at the point of failure. Although I agree that
long-term stretching is likely beneficial, the underlying reason remains unknown. For example, the prevailing theory is that most muscle strains occur during eccentric loading within the normal range of motion. This can occur because there is heterogeneity in sarcomere length during muscle activity – some sarcomeres lengthen while others shorten. Therefore, the ‘‘length at failure’’ during passive tests may not be relevant. Ian Shrier Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Acknowledgements No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this letter.
References 1. Woods K, Bishop P, Jones E. Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Med 2007; 37 (12): 1089-99 2. Shrier I. Pre-exercise stretching may not prevent injuries: a critical review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med 1999; 9: 110 3. Shrier I. Does stretching help prevent injuries? In: MacAuley D, Best T, editors. Evidence-based sports medicine. Vol. 2. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2007 4. Pope RP, Herbert RD, Kirwan JD, et al. A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 271-7 5. Hartig DE, Henderson JM. Increasing hamstring flexibility decreases lower extremity overuse injuries in military basic trainees. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 173-6 6. Bixler B, Jones RL. High-school football injuries: effects of a post-halftime warm-up and stretching routine. Fam Pract Res J 1992; 12: 131-9
The Author’s Reply Although Dr Shrier’s review[1] was not published at the time our article was accepted for publication, we are sure the information presented will add to this current discussion. Dr Shrier questions the comparison of multiple studies. He uses the phrase ‘‘multiple interventions’’ in referring to only one referenced study. If he will
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 879 0112-1642/08/0010-0879/$48.00/0
CORRESPONDENCE
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Warm-Up and Stretching in the Prevention of Muscular Injury I recently read the article by Woods et al.[1] with interest. There are a couple of issues that require clarification. First, the authors appear to have missed several articles cited in other reviews.[2,3] More importantly, the authors fail to distinguish between studies that examined stretching immediately prior to exercise (e.g. Pope et al.[4]) from those that examined stretching at other times (e.g. Hartig and Henderson[5]), or that included multiple interventions (e.g. Bixler and Jones[6]). For a variety of reasons described elsewhere, there are strong theoretical reasons to believe that stretching before exercise is not the same intervention as stretching at other times. In brief, one could use the analogy of weight lifting. An acute bout of weight lifting causes a decrease in measured force similar to an acute bout of stretching. A long-term weight-training programme produces an increase in force, similar to a long-term programme of stretching. Therefore, one would expect injury rates to be different depending on the timing of the intervention. Although there are not many studies on the long-term effects of stretching, the clinical evidence suggests that this may indeed be the case. Secondly, a focus on only muscle injuries and excluding other types of injuries is not advisable because the effects of stretching are not limited to muscle. If stretching affects neuromuscular function, one would expect an increase in falls or collisions and the injury may not necessarily occur at the muscle level. Therefore, the intervention could decrease (or increase) muscle injuries and have the opposite effect for total injuries. In other medical areas, difficult lessons were learned when investigators focused only on disease-specific outcomes and pronounced beneficial effects of medications, and later found that overall mortality increased because of unanticipated effects. Finally, the authors suggest that long-term stretching may increase the length of the muscle at the point of failure. Although I agree that
long-term stretching is likely beneficial, the underlying reason remains unknown. For example, the prevailing theory is that most muscle strains occur during eccentric loading within the normal range of motion. This can occur because there is heterogeneity in sarcomere length during muscle activity – some sarcomeres lengthen while others shorten. Therefore, the ‘‘length at failure’’ during passive tests may not be relevant. Ian Shrier Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Acknowledgements No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this letter.
References 1. Woods K, Bishop P, Jones E. Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Med 2007; 37 (12): 1089-99 2. Shrier I. Pre-exercise stretching may not prevent injuries: a critical review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med 1999; 9: 110 3. Shrier I. Does stretching help prevent injuries? In: MacAuley D, Best T, editors. Evidence-based sports medicine. Vol. 2. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2007 4. Pope RP, Herbert RD, Kirwan JD, et al. A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 271-7 5. Hartig DE, Henderson JM. Increasing hamstring flexibility decreases lower extremity overuse injuries in military basic trainees. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 173-6 6. Bixler B, Jones RL. High-school football injuries: effects of a post-halftime warm-up and stretching routine. Fam Pract Res J 1992; 12: 131-9
The Author’s Reply Although Dr Shrier’s review[1] was not published at the time our article was accepted for publication, we are sure the information presented will add to this current discussion. Dr Shrier questions the comparison of multiple studies. He uses the phrase ‘‘multiple interventions’’ in referring to only one referenced study. If he will
880
review our article in more detail, it will be apparent that most, if not all, studies reviewed included some type of ‘‘multiple intervention.’’ For example, as was clearly stated in our review, it is difficult to distinguish the benefits of stretching or warm-up individually because protocols almost always involve some type of warm-up prior to the stretching regimen. This is because, as is widely accepted, it is more advantageous to stretch a warmed muscle than a ‘cold’ one. He also mentions the timing of the stretching within the study. Again, if our article is reviewed in more detail, it is apparent that, of the studies involving stretching/warm-up and physical activity and injury rates, all conducted their stretching prior to the physical activity in question. Dr Shrier states that injury rates will be different depending on the timing of the intervention. This is precisely our point – muscular injury rates are different (reduced) when a warm-up and stretching regimen is incorporated prior to physical activity. Our article was interested in the application of warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury occurring during physical activities. As was clearly pointed out in our review, the warm-up and stretching regimens for reducing muscular injury during activity would stand little chance of reducing major traumatic injuries to bones, for example, that may occur as a result of direct trauma during a sporting event, such as American football or ice hockey.
ª 2008 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
Letter to the Editor
The ‘prevailing theory’ is one reason why this topic was addressed. Eccentric loading within the normal range of motion (assuming that the load is a force that muscle cannot withstand) may cause injury. If heterogeneity in sarcomere length is the sole underlying cause of injury, then sarcomere function (sarcomere lengthening vs shortening) at the critical moment for providing appropriate muscular force is important during ‘‘length at failure.’’ Length at failure and possible homogeneity of sarcomere length, as discussed from the standpoint of an increased range of motion and a subsequent increase in a theorized ‘‘non-injury zone,’’ are possible reasons for the benefits of longterm stretching. Therefore, the length at failure is indeed relevant if the muscle is able to stretch further before heterogeneity in sarcomere length is achieved during dynamic muscular activity. Krista Woods M.A. Human Performance Laboratory, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
Acknowledgements No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this letter. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this letter.
Reference 1. Shrier I. Does stretching help prevent injuries? In: MacAuley D, Best T, editors. Evidence-based sports medicine. Vol 2. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2007
Sports Med 2008; 38 (10)
