OUTLINES OF THE
HISTORY OF DOGMA BY Dr.
ADOLF HARNACK
Professor of Church History in the University of Berlin
TRANS...
29 downloads
2011 Views
35MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
OUTLINES OF THE
HISTORY OF DOGMA BY Dr.
ADOLF HARNACK
Professor of Church History in the University of Berlin
TRANSLATED BY
EDWIN KNOX MITCHELL,
M.A.
Professor of Grceco-Roman and Eastern Church History in Hartford Theological Seminary
NEW YORK
FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY LONDON
and
TORONTO
1893 Printed in the United States
/
.
Copyright,
1893,
by the
FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY [Registered at Stationers' Hall, London, Eng. ] 1
*fe
Hai
•
PREFACE. THE
English translation of
my
^
'
"Grundriss
der Dogmengeschichte" has been made, in accordance
with
my
expressed wish, by
my
former pupil and esteemed friend, Mr. Edwin
Knox
Mitchell.
It is
my
pleasant duty to ex-
him here my heartiest thanks. English and American theological literature
press to
possess excellent works, but they are in products within the
Dogma.
my
I
may
not rich
realm of the History of
therefore perhaps hope
"Grundriss" will supply a want.
be most happy,
if I
I
that shall
can with this book do
my
English and American friends and fellow-workers
some
benefit
service
which
I
—a
small return for the rich
have reaped from their
labors.
In reality, however, there no longer exists any distinction
between German and English theo-
logical science.
that
scientific
The exchange theologians
of
is
now
all
so brisk
evangelical
lands form already one Concilium.
Adolf Harnack. Wilmersdorf near Berlin, March 17th, 1892,
*
CONTENTS. PAGE
Prolegomena to the Discipline I. Idea and Aim of the History of Dogma
1
... .... .
.
Narrative of the History of Dogma Presuppositions of the History of Dogma III. Introductory IV. The Gospel of Jesus Christ according to His II.
1
8 10 10
Own
Testimony
1£
Proclamation concerning Jesus Christ in the First Generation of His Adherents VI. The Current Exposition of the Old Testament and the Jewish Future Hope, in their Bearing on the Earliest Formulation of the Christian Message VII. The Religious Conceptions and the Religious Philosophy of the Hellenistic Jews in their Bearing on the Transformation of the Gospel Message VIII. The Religious Disposition of the Greeks and RoV. The General
.
18
.
23
.
28
in the First Two Centuries and the Contemporary Greeco-Roman Philosophy of Religion
mans
.
PAKT
.
32
I.
THE RISE OF ECCLESIASTICAL DOGMA. Book
I.
THE PREPARATION.
—
Chapter I. Historical Survey Chapter II.— Ground Common to Christians and Attitude Taken toward Judaism Chapter III.— The Common Faith and the Beginnings of Self- Recognition in that Gentile Christianity which was to Develop into Catholicism .
)
.
39
40
43
CONTENTS.
vili
PAGE
Chapter IV.
—Attempt
of the Gnostics to Construct
an
Apostolic Doctrine of Faith and to Produce a Christian Theology or, the Acute Secularization of Christianity Chapter V. Marcion's Attempt to Set Aside the Old Testament as the Foundation of the Gospel, to Purify Tradition, and to Reform Christianity on the ;
58
—
Basis of the Pauline Gospel Chapter VI. —Supplement The Christianity of the Jewish
70
:
74
Christians
Book
II.
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION. Chapter Section
Chapter
I.
— Historical Survey
I.
II.
81
Establishment of Christianity as a Church and its Gradual Secidarization.
—The
Forth of the Apostolic Rules
Setting
(Norms) for
Ecclesiastical
The
Christianity.
Catholic Church A. The Recasting of the Baptismal Confession into the Apostolic Rule of Faith B. The Recognition of a Selection of Well-known Scriptures as Virtually Belonging to the Old as a Compilation of Apostolic i. e. Testament
84
85
,
;
88
Scriptures
The Transformation of the Episcopal Office in the Church into the Apostolic Office. History of the 95 Transformation of the Idea of the Church Chapter III. Continuation: The Old Christianity and 100 the New Church C.
.
.
—
Establishment of Christianity as Doctrine and
Section II.
its
Chapter IV.
Gradual Secidarization.
— Ecclesiastical Christianity
The Apologists
and Philosophy. 117
,
—
Chapter V. Beginnings of an Ecclesiastico-Theological Exposition and Revision of the Rule of Faith in Opposition to Gnosticism on the Presupposition of the New Testament and the Christian Philosophy of the Apologists Irenaaus, Tertullian, Hippoly130 tus, Cyprian, Novatian :
:
CONTENTS. Chapter VI.
— Transformation
IX PACE
of Ecclesiastical Tradition
into a Philosophy of Religion, or the Origin of Scientific Ecclesiastical Theology
and Dogmatics
Clement and Origen
149
—
Chapter VII. Decisive Result of Theological Speculation within the Realm of the Rule of Faith, or the Defining of the Ecclesiastical Doctrinal Norm through the Acceptance of the Logos- Christology 166 .
PART
.
II.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECCLESIASTICAL DOGMA. Book
I.
HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOGMA AS DOCTRINE OF THE GOD-MAN UPON THE BASIS OF NATURAL THEOLOGY. Chapter Chapter
I.
— Historical Survey
IL— The
193
Fundamental Conception of Salvation
and a General Sketch of the Doctrine of Faith 206 The Sources of Knowledge and the Authorities, or Scripture, Tradition, and the Church 212 .
Chapter HI.
—
.
A.
TJie
Presuppositions of the Doctrine of Salvation, or Natural TJieology.
—
Chapter IV. The Presuppositions and Conceptions of God, the Creator, as the Dispenser of Salvation 225 Chapter V. The Presuppositions and Conceptions of Man 229 as the Recipient of Salvation .
—
B.
....
The Doctrine of Redemption through the Person of the
God-Man Chapter
in its Historical Development.
Doctrine of the Necessity and Reality of Redemption through the Incarnation of the Son
VI.— The
God Chapter VII.— The Doctrine of the Homousion of God with God Himself
235
of
I.
II.
III.
of the
Son
.....
242
242 Until Council of Nicsea 253 Until Death of Constantius 259 Until Councils of Constantinople, 381, 383 Supplement The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit 266 and of the Trinity .
:
.
CONTENTS.
X
PAGE
— The
Doctrine of the Perfect Equality as to Nature of the Incarnate Son of God and
Chapter VIII.
Humanity
*
I.
^
II.
III.
274
— Continuation
The Doctrine of the Personal Union of the Divine and Human Natures in the Incarnate Son of God 280 The Nestorian Controversy 280 287 The Eutychian Controversy The Monophysite Controversies and the 5th
Chapter IX.
:
294 Council IV. The Monergistic and Monothelitic Controversies, 300 the 6th Council and John of Damascus .
C.
TJie
.
Temporal Enjoyment of Redemption.
— —
305 Chapter X. The Mysteries, and Matters Akin to Them Chapter XI. Conclusion Sketch of. the Historic Begin318 nings of the Orthodox System .
....
:
Book
II.
EXPANSION AND RECASTING OF THE DOGMA INTO A DOCTRINE CONCERNING SIN, GRACE AND THE MEANS OF GRACE UPON THE BASIS OF THE CHURCH. Chapter Chapter
I.
— Historical Survey — Occidental Christianity and Occidental The-
ologians before Augustine
Chapter HI.
III.
—The
.... ....
335
World-Historical Position of Augus342 tine as Teacher of the Church Augustine's Doctrine of the First and Last Things 345 The Donatist Contest. The Work " De Civitate Dei. " The Doctrine of the Church and of the
Chapter IV. I.
329
—The World-Historical Position of Augustine
as Reformer of Christian Piety
II.
326
II.
Means of Grace The Pelagian Contest.
354
Doctrine of Grace and
of Sin
363
Exposition of the Symbol. The New Doctrine of Religion 376 in the Occident till the Chapter V. History of Dogma Beginning of the Middle Ages (430-604) 382 IV. Augustine's
—
.
.
CONTENTS.
XI PAGE
Contest between Semi-Pelagianism and Augustini
I.
anism 387 Gregory the Great (590-604) Chapter VI. History of Dogma in the Time of the Carlo vingian Renaissance 392 394 I. A. The Adoption Controversy II.
.
—
395 The Predestination Controversy Controversy about the Filioque and about Images 397 The Development, in Practice and in Theory, of
B.
I.
II.
III.
the Mass
Chapter VII.
(Dogma
of the Eucharist) and of Penance 399
— History of Dogma in the Time
of Clugny,
III.
Anselm and Bernard to the End of the 12th .406 Century 407 The Revival of Piety 412 On the History of Ecclesiastical Law 414 The Revival of Science
IV.
Work upon
I.
II.
.
the
Dogma
422
.
A. The Berengar Controversy B. Anselm 's Doctrine of Satisfaction and the Doctrines of the Atonement of the Theologians of the 12th Century Chapter VIII. History of Dogma in the Time of the Mendicant Orders till the Beginning of the 16th Century I. On the History of Piety II. On the History of Ecclesiastical Law. The Doc.
423
427
—
trine of the
Church
442
On
the History of Ecclesiastical Science IV. The Reminting of Dogmatics into Scholastics III.
433
434
.
.
452
.
461
A. The Working Over of the Traditional Articuli Fidei 462 B. The Scholastic Doctrine of the Sacraments 468 C. The Revising of Augustinianism in the Direction of the Doctrine of Meritorious Works 488 .
Book
.
.
.
.
III.
THE THREE-FOLD ISSUING OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA. Chapter Chapter
I.
— Historical Survey — The Issuing of the
II.
tholicism
501
Dogma
in
Roman
Ca510
CONTENTS.
Xll
I.
PAGE Codification of the Mediaeval Doctrines in Opposi510 tion to Protestantism (Tridentine Decrees) .
.
Post-Tridentine Development as a Preparation for 518 the Vatican Council 527 III. The Vatican Council Chapter III. The Issuing of the Dogma in Anti-Trinita529 rianism and Socinianism II.
—
I.
Historical Introduction
529
535 The Socinian Doctrine Chapter IV. The Issuing of the Dogma in Protestantism 541 II.
—
I.
II.
541
Introduction Luther's Christianity
545
Luther's Strictures on the Dominating Ecclesi551 astical Tradition and on the Dogma IV. The Catholic Elements Retained with and within 557 Luther's Christianity
III.
.
.
.
—
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
PROLEGOMENA TO THE
DISCIPLINE.
Idea and Aim of the History of Dogma.
I.
Religion
1.
since
it
is
a practical affair with mankind,
has to do with our highest happiness and
with those faculties which pertain to a holy
But
Religion,
life.
in every religion these faculties are closely con-
nected with some definite faith or with some
which are referred back
nite cult,
Christianity
lation.
is
Divine Reve-
to
that religion in
impulse and power to a blessed and holy
up with
which the
life is
bound
God as the Father of Jesus Christ. God is believed to be the omnipotent
faith in
So far as this
Lord
defi-
of
heaven and earth, the Christian religion
includes a particular knowledge of God, of the world so far,
how-
ever, as this religion teaches that
God can be
truly
known only
inseparable from
and
of the purpose of created things
historical 2.
The
in Jesus Christ,
it is
;
knowledge. inclination to formulate
religion in Articles
of Faith
tianity as the effort to
is
f the content of ArFaith.°
as natural to Chris-
verify these articles with
reference to science and to history.
On
the other
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
2
hand the universal and supernatural character of the Christian religion imposes upon its adherents the duty of finding a statement of
it
which
will not be
impaired by our wavering knowledge of nature and history
before every possible theory of nature or of
itself
Problem
and, indeed, which will be able to maintain
;
The problem which thus
history.
arises permits,
Insoluble.
indeed, of no absolute solution, since is relative
and yet religion essays
;
all
to bring her ab-
solute truth into the sphere of relative
and
and every thinking Christian
come
the problem does not
testifies,
to its solution
that account the progressive efforts
been Attempts at
Solution.
made
to solve
it
knowledge
But history
to reduce it to statement there.
teaches,
knowledge
;
that
even on
which have
are of value.
The most thorough-going attempt at solution hitherto is that which the Catholic Church made, and which the churches of the Reformation (with more or less restrictions) have continued to make, viz. Accepting a collection of Christian and Pre3.
:
Christian writings and oral traditions as of Divine origin, to
deduce from them a system of doctrine,
arranged in
form
scientific
which should have as
God and
of the world
its
and
for apologetic purposes,
content the knowledge of of the
means
of salvation;
then to proclaim this complex system {of dogma)
compendium of Christianity, to demand of every mature member of the Church a faithful acas the
ceptance of the
same
is
it,
and at the same time
to
maintain thai
a necessary preparation for the blessed-
;
PROLEGOMENA.
With
ness promised by the religion.
Church
augmen-
brotherhood, whose character
tation the Christian
as " Catholic
this
" is essentially
indicated under
this conception of Christianity, took a definite and,
was supposed,
as
science of nature ious faith in
much
as
it
incontestable attitude toward the
and
of history, expressed its relig-
God and
required of
and yet gave
Christ,
(inas-
members an acceptance
all its
of these articles of faith) to the thinking part of the
community a system which
is
capable of a wider and
Thus arose dog-
indeed boundless development.
matic Christianity. 4.
The aim
of the history
of dogma
is,
(1)
To
ex-
plain the origin of this dogmatic Christianity, and,
To describe its development. 5. The history of the rise of dogmatic Christianity would seem to close when a well-formulated sys-
Aim
of
History of
Dogma
(2)
tem
of
belief
had been established by
means, and had been made the
"
Rise
of
Dogma.
scientific
articulus constitu-
tivus ecelesiw" and as such had been imposed upon the entire Church.
from the 3d Christology
dogma creto
is
it
This took place in the transition
to the 4th century
was
established.
when
the Logos-
The development
of
in abstracto without limit, but in con-
has come to an end.
For, (a) the Greek
Develop-
ment of Dogma. Greek Church.
Church maintains that
its
system of dogma has been
complete since the end of the " Image Controversy (b)
the
Roman
ity of the
"
Catholic Church leaves the possibil-
formulating of
the Tridentine Council
new dogmas
and
still
more
open, but in
in the Vatican
Roman Church..
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OP DOGMA.
4
has
in fact on political
it
dogma
as a legal system
grounds rounded out
which above
all
demands
obedience and only secondarily conscious faith
Roman
its
;
the
Catholic Church has consequently abandoned
the original motive of dogmatic Christianity and
has placed a wholly EvanepiChurches,
new motive
in its stead, retain-
ing the mere semblance of the old
;
(c)
The Evan-
gelical churches have, on the one hand, accepted a
greater part of the formulated doctrines of dogmatic
Christianity and seek to ground them, like the Catholic
Church, in the Holy Scriptures.
But, on the
other hand, they took a different view of the authority of the
Holy
Scriptures, they put aside tradition
as a source in matters of belief, they questioned the significance of the empirical
dogma, and above
all
Church as regards the
they tried to put forward a
formulation of the Christian religion, which goes directly
Word
"
true understanding of the
Thus
in principle the ancient dog-
back to the
of God."
matic conception of Christianity was set aside, while
however in certain matters no
fixed attitude
was
taken toward the same and reactions began at once
and
still
continue.
Therefore
is it
announced that
Protestant
the history of Protestant doctrine will be excluded
Excluded,
from the history of dogma, and within the former will be indicated only the position of the
and
Reformers
of the churches of the Reformation, out of
the later complicated development grew.
history of
dogma can be
pleted discipline.
which
Hence the
treated as relatively a com-
PROLEGOMENA. The claim
0.
Church that the dogmas are
of the
simply the exposition of the Christian revelation, because deduced from the Holy Scriptures,
On
confirmed by historical investigation. trary,
it
is
not
Expo-
^j?gti
^
a uon.
the con-
becomes clear that dogmatic Christianity
dogmas) in
(the
Dogmas not
its
conception and in
its
construc-
work of the Hellenic spirit upon the Gospel soil. The intellectual medium by which in early times men sought to make the Gospel comprewas
tion
the
became
insep-
arably blended with the content of the same.
Thus
hensible and to establish
arose the dogma, in
it
securely,
whose formation,
to be sure,
other factors (the words of Sacred Scripture, require-
ments of the
and
cult,
and
of the organization, political
social environment, the impulse to
to their logical
push things
consequences, blind custom,
etc.)
played a part, yet so that the desire and effort to
formulate the main principles of the Christian re-
demption, and to explain and develop them, secured the upper hand, at least in the earlier times.
dogma proved to 2?^?^. same was to be the pure Dogma,
Just as the formulating of the
7.
be an illusion, so far as the
exposition of the Gospel, so also does historical investigation destroy the other illusion of the Church, viz.
:
that the dogma, always having been the
same
have simply been explained, and that
eccle-
therein,
siastical theology
to explain the
has never had any other aim than
unchanging dogma and
heretical teaching pressing in
formulating of the
dogma
to refute the
from without.
The
indicates rather that the-
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
6
ology constructed the dogma, but that the Church
must ever conceal the labor of the theologians, which thus places them in an unfortunate plight. In each favorable case the result of their labor has
been declared to be a reproduction and they themselves
have been robbed of their best service; as a under the
rule in the progress of history they fell
condemnation of the dogmatic scheme, whose foundation they themselves had laid, and so entire generrations of theologians, as well as the chief leaders thereof, have, in the further
development of dogma,
been afterwards marked and declared to be heretics
Dogma
or held in suspicion. ress of history Augustine,
g.
devoured
its
has ever in the prog-
own
progenitors.
Although dogmatic Christianity has never,
the process of
its
development, lost
and character as a work
and of Origin),
through Augustine and
original style
of the spirit of perishing
antiquity upon Gospel soil
apologists
its
of the Greek
{style
yet
later
it
experienced
through
pioned a
new and more evangelical
by Paulinism; Augus-
it
of the tra-
dogma, rather did he co-ordinate the old and
the new; Luther, indeed, attempted
carry
of
conception of
however hardly attempted a revision
ditional
Both
more than the former, cham-
Christianity, guided chiefly tine
first
Luther a
deeper and more thorough transformation. these men, the latter
in
through.
The Christian
dogma gained through
it,
but did not
quality of
the
the influence of each, and the
old traditional system of
dogma was
relaxed some-
.
.
PROLEGOMENA. what
— this was
much
so
7
the case in Protestantism
that one does well, as remarked above, no longer to
consider the symbolical teaching of the Protestant
churches as wholly a recasting of the old dogma. 9.
An
understanding of
process cannot be secured doctrines
the dogmatico-historic
by
isolating the special
Periods in History of
Dogma-
and considering them separately (Special
History of Dogma) after that the epochs have been previously characterized (General History of It is
much
better to consider the " general "
" special " in
arately,
Dogma) and the
each period and to treat the periods sep-
and as much as possible
to prove the special
doctrines to be the outcome of the fundamental ideas
and motives.
It is
not possible, however, to
more than four principal gin of
Dogma.
II.
a.
divisions, viz.
:
I.
The Development
make
The
of
Ori-
Dogma
in accordance with the principles of its original con-
ception (Oriental Development from Arianism to the
Image-Controversy).
opment
of
Dogma
II.
b.
The Occidental Devel-
under the influence of Augustine's
Roman papal politics. II. c. Issuing of Dogma (in the churches
Christianity and the
The Three-fold of the
Reformation
— in Tridentine Catholicism — and
in the criticism of the rationalistic age,
i.e.,
of So-
cinianism) 10.
The
history of dogma, in that
it
sets forth the
process of the origin and development of the dogma, offers the
very best means and methods of freeing
the Church from dogmatic Christianity, and of hast-
ening the inevitable process of emancipation, which
value of
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
8
But the history
began with Augustine. testifies
also to the unity
it
dogma
and continuity of the
Christian faith in the progress of far as
of
its history, in
so
proves that certain fundamental ideas of the
Gospel have never been
lost
and have
defied all
attacks.
II.— History of the History of Dogma. Mosheim,
The narrative
of the History of
Dogma begins
first
etc.
in the 18th century with
Mosheim, Walch, Ernesti,
Lessing, and Semler, since Catholicism in general
not fitted for a critical handling of the subject,
is
al-
though learned works have been written by individBaronius,
ual Catholic theologians (Baronius Bellarmin, Peta-
etc.
vius,
Thomassin, Kuhn, Schwane, Bach,
etc.),
and
since the Protestant churches remained until the
18th century under the ban of confessionalism,
al-
though important contributions were made in the Luther,
time of the Reformation (Luther, Okolampad, Mel-
etc.
anchthon, Flacius, Hyperius, Chemnitz) to the cal treatment of the
upon the labors Erasmus, etc.
(L. Valla;
criti-
History of Dogma, based in part
of the critically disposed humanists
Erasmus,
etc.).
But without the learned
material, which, on the one band, the Benedictine Benedictine, etc.
and other Orders had gathered together, and, on the other, the Protestant Casaubonus, Vossius, Pearson,
Dalläus, Spanheim, Grabe, Basnage, etc., and withGottfried Arnold.
out the grand impulse which fried Arnold), the
work
pietism gave (Gott-
of the 18th century
would
PROLEGOMENA. have been inconsiderable.
dogma
history of
gave
it
9
Rationalism robbed the
of its ecclesiastical interest
over to a critical treatment in which
and its
darkness was lighted up in part by the lamp of
common understanding and
of general historical contemplation
Dogma by
History of
(first
Lange, 1796, previous works by Semler,
Rössler, Löffler, etc., then the
Lehrbuch,
Aufl.
1.
Bdd. 1802
1811,
3.
an excellent
f.,
Aufl.
Lange.
Dogma
History of
by Mimscher, Handb. 4 Bdd. 1797 2
by the torch
in part
Münscher.
Munter
1832,
Stäudlin 1800 and 1822, Augusti
f,
1805 and 1835, Gieseler, edited by Redepenning 2
The valuable handbooks of Baumgarten-Crusius 1832, i.e. 1840 and 1846, and of Meier Bdd. 1855).
1840,
i.e.
mark
1854,
Baume:arten-Crusius.
the transition to a class of
works in which an inner understanding of the proof the History of
cess
Dogma
which Lessing had already
has been won, for
and
which
Lessing,
Herder, Schleiermacher and the Romanticists on the
Schleier-
one side, and Hegel and Schelling on the other, had
Schelling.
striven,
for
Herder,
prepared the way. of
F. Chr.
3.
Thl. 1865
in
1847,
Glaubenslehre 2 Bdd.
a one-sided way,
1840
f.
(cf
.
also Strauss,
Marheineke 1849).
the Schleiermacher point of view,
Thl.
1857)
Baur.
which the dogmatico-historic
was, so to speak, lived over again
(2.
Vorles.
1867,
i.e.
process, conceived to be sure in
From
Hegel,
Epoch-making were the writings
Baur (Lehrb. f.),
macher,
and Hagenbach
(1840,
is
Neander
i.e.
1867).
Dorner (History of the Doctrine of the Person of Christ, 1839 i.e. 1845-53) attempted to unite
Neander.
Hegel
Dorner.
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
10
From
and Schleiermacher.
the Lutheran Confes-
standpoint Kliefoth (Einl. in
sional
Thomasius
(2
Bdd. 1874
f.
d.
D. G. 1839),
and 1887 edited by Bon-
Schmid (1859 i.e. 1887 ed. by Hauck) and, with reservations, Kahnis (The Faith of the wetsch
1
Bd.),
A
Church, 18G4). Nitzsch.
the History of
marked advance
Dogma by
Nitzsch
(1
is
indicated in
For
Bd. 1870).
a correct understanding especially of the origin of
dogma beck,
the labors of Rothe, Ritschi, Renan, Overv.
Engelhardt,
Weizsäcker and Reville are
valuable.
PRESUPPOSITIONS OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA. Introductory.
III. Gospel
is
chnst.
i
in the " fulness of time.
The gospel appeared
.
^ n( ^ e Q 0Sp e j
i js
Jesus Christ.
the announcement
is
made
In these sentences
that the Gospel
is
the
climax of an universal development and yet that has
its
power in a personal
stroyed not," but "fulfilled." life
before
God and
of Judaism,
in
Jesus
Life.
He
witnessed a
new
God, but within the confines
and upon the
soil of
the Old Testament
whose hidden treasures he uncovered. shown, that everything that in the
it
Christ " de-
is
It
can be
"lofty and spiritual"
Psalms and Prophets, and everything that had
been gained through the development of Grecian ethics, is reaffirmed in the plain
but
it
obtained
its
power
and simple Gospel
there, because
it
became
— PROLEGOMENA.
11
and deed in a Person, whose greatness consists also in this, that he did not remould his earthly enlife
vironment, nor encounter any subsequent rebuff, in other words, that he did not
become entangled
in
his times. 2.
Two
generations later there existed, to be sure, confeder° ated Conunited and homogeneous Church, but there £ re s atlons '
no
were scattered throughout the wide confederated congregations
of
Roman
-
empire
Christian believers
(churches) who, for the most part, were Gentile-
born and condemned the Jewish nation and religion as apostate; they appropriated the
Old Testament as
by right and considered themselves a "new nation", and yet as the "ancient creation of God", theirs
while in sacred
departments of
all
communities
is
these confederated Gentile Christian v
the preliminary condition to the rise
dogmatic Christianity.
The organization
of these churches began, indeed,
in the apostolic times is
and thought certain
forms were gradually being put forward.
The existence of of
life
and their peculiar constitution
negatively indicated by the freeing of the Gospel
While
from the Jewish church.
in Islamism the
Arabic nation remained for centuries the main trunk of the
new
religion, it is
an astonishing fact in the
history of the Gospel, that
it
soon
left its
native soil
and went forth into the wide world and realized
its
universal character, not through the transformation of the
Jewish
world-religion
religion,
but by developing into a
upon Grceco- Roman
soil.
The Gos-
Freeing of Gospel fr0,n
Jew "
h Church
-
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
12 Gospel
became a world-religion in
pel
having a
that,
World-Religion.
message for
all
mankind,
it
preached
it to
Greek
and barbarian, and accordingly attached itself to the spiritual and political life of the ivorld-
Roman
wide Classical Epoch of
Gospel History.
3.
empire.
Since the Gospel in
its
and was preached only
ish
this transition,
original form
was Jew-
to the Jews, there lay in
which was brought about,
in part
gradually and without
disturbance,
through a severe
consequences of the most
From
stringent kind.
Church and
of the
crisis,
of
and in part
the standpoint of the history
dogma, the
brief history of the
Gospel within the bounds of Palestinian Judaism
And
accordingly a paleontological epoch.
is
yet this
remains the classical epoch, not only on account of the Founder and of the original testimony, but quite Paul's Mis-
as
much
because a Jewish Christian (Paul) recog-
sion.
nized the Gospel as the power of God, which able to save both
Jew and
was
Greek, and because he
designedly severed the Gospel from the Jewish national religion of the
Law.
and proclaimed the Christ as the end
Then other Jewish
Christians, personal
disciples of Jesus, indeed, followed (see
also the 4th
him
in all this
Gospel and the Epistle to the
Hebrews) No Chasm Between Earlier
Yet there
Epoch and brief Succeeding Period.
is
in reality
no chasm between the older
epoch and the succeeding period, so far as the
Gospel
is
in itself universalistic,
very soon became manifest.
which Paul and
and
this character
But the means by
his sympathizers set forth the uni-
PROLEGOMENA.
13
versal character of the Gospel (proving that the Old
Testament religion had been with) was
fulfilled
and done away
understood, and, vice versa, the
little
manner and means by which the Gentile Christians came to an acceptance of the Gospel, can only in part be attributed to the preaching of Paul.
we now
as
New
possess in the
Testament substan-
tial writings in
which the Gospel
thought out that
it is
Old Testament
So far
is
so thoroughly
prized as the supplantei" of the
religion,
and writings which
at the
same time are not deeply touched with the Greek spirit,
does this literature differ radically from
all
that follows. 4.
00
The growing Gentile Church, notwithstanding ° 7
Paul's significant relation toward
prehend,
nor
it,
did not com-
really experience the crisis,
which the Pauline conception
out of
of the Gospel arose.
In the Jewish propaganda, within which the Old
Testament had long since become liberalized and spiritualized, the Gentile
ually subjecting the
Church, entering and grad-
same
to itself,
seldom
felt
the
problem of the reconciliation of the Old Testament with the Gospel, since by means of the allegorical
method the propaganda had freed themselves from the letter of the law, but its
spirit;
indeed they had simply cast
national character. the
had not entirely overcome
Jews and
Moved by
later also of the Gentiles
people
" for itself,
the
their
the hostile power of
consciousness of inherent strength to "
off
and by the organize a
Church as a matter
of course
Gentile
Church did
^J^^ Problem,
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
14
took on the form of the thought and
which
in
immoral and vulgar.
istic, Gentiie
R
lived, casting aside
it
ganizations,
ed
Many character^
mon y
which with
to their kinship
life of
the world
everything polythe-
Thus arose the new
all their
newness bore
or-
testi-
with the original Palestinian
churches, in so far as,
(1)
was
the Old Testament
istics
likewise recognized as a primitive revelation, and in so far as, (2) the strong spiritual
monotheism,
(3)
the outlines of the proclamation concerning Jesus Christ,
(4)
the consciousness of a direct and living
fellowship with (5)
God through
the gift of the Spirit,
the expectation of the approaching end of the
world, and the earnest conviction of the personal responsibility
and accountability
of each individual
To
soul were all likewise maintained.
be added
finally, that
these
is
to
the earliest Jewish-Christian
proclamation, yes, the Gospel
itself,
bears the stamp
of the spiritual epochs, out of
which
it
arose,
—of the
Hellenic age, in which the nations exchanged their
wares and religions were transformed, and the idea of the
worth and accountability of every soul became
widespread;
so
that
the
Hellenism which
soon
was not
abso-
pressed so mightily into the Church lutely strange iS
Do mahas ih
t
°Gent5e only.
^'
tile
^ie
and new.
hi^OTV of dogma has
do with the Gen-
—the history of theology begins, with Paul — but in order to understand his-
Church only
is true,
to
it
,
torically the basis of the formation of doctrine in the
Gentile Church,
it
must take
into consideration, as
already stated, the following as antecedent condi-
PROLEGOMENA.
15
The Gospel of Jesus Christ, (2) The general and simultaneous proclamation of Jesus Christ in the first generation of believers, (3) The tions:
(1) v '
Presuppositions.
current understanding and exposition of the Old
Testament and the Jewish anticipations of the fu-
and their speculations, (4) The religious conceptions and the religious philosophy of the Helture
The religious attitude of the Greeks and Romans during the first two centu-
lenistic Jews,
and
ries,
(5)
the current
Grceco-Boman philosophy
of religion.
IV.— The Gospel of Jesus Christ according to His (^The Gospel
is
Own
the good
Testimony.
news
of the reign of the
Almighty and Holy God, the Father and Judge the world and of each individual soul.
which makes men and gives them
God
is
man who
secure, even
if
who
seek to
kingdom
gives him-
win the world and
to
while those
keep their
life
fall
hands of the Judge, who condemns them to
This reign of God, in that
it
rises
above
all
ceremonies and statutes, places
men under
which
Whole-hearted love
to
is
old
God and
ever
it
Js
he should immediately
the world and his earthly life;
hell.
e
"oT
to realize their citizenship in the ap-
lose
into the
p
In this reign,
citizens of the heavenly
proaching eon, the life of every self to
of
^^
G
and Jyet new,
viz.
:
to one's neighbor.
a law,
In this love, wher-
controls the thoughts in their deepest springs,
that belter justice is exemplified
which corresponds
Love
to
God and
Man
-
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
16
perfection of God.
to the
The way
to secure this
by a change of heart, i.e. by selfdenial and humility before God and a heart-felt righteousness
is
In such humility and trust in
the soul realizes
own un worthiness. The Gospel, even sinners, who are so disposed,
however,
calls
its
unto the kingdom of God, in that
with his
satisfaction
justice, i.e.,
the forgiveness of the sins
separated them from God.
S V"
er1>
ty
La W Lo v e sri
For-
vctiGss of sin.
Word and Deed
in Jesus.
them
assures
guarantees them
In the three-fold form, is set forth,
(God's
sovereignty, higher justice [law of love] and for-
giveness of sin)
is
inseparably connected with
Jesus Christ everywhere called
In him
self.
his
it
For in the proclamation
Jesus Christ. pel,
Gospel
it
which have hitherto
however, in which the Gospel G
God
trust in him.
is
the Gospel
meat and drink and,
personal
He
men.
is
men
unto him-
word and deed;
therefore, is it
and into this
life,
of the Gos-
life
it is
become his
he would draw
all
who knows the Father. Men him how kind the Lord is; in him
the Son,
should see in
they
may
God
over the world and be comforted in this trust
experience the power and sovereignty of
him, the meek and gentle-hearted One, should they follow
;
and inasmuch as
calls sinners
sured that
he, the holy
and pure One,
unto himself, they should be fully as-
God through him
forgives siny'
This close connection of his Gospel with his person, Jesus
but
left
by no means made prominent
his disciples to experience
himself the Son of
Man and
led
it.
them on
in
He
words, called
to the con-
— PROLEGOMENA. he was their Master and
that
fession
17
Messiah.
Jesus Messiah.
them people a comprehensible expression, and
Thereby he gave
and
for his
to his lasting significance for
at the close of his life, in
an hour of great solemnity,
he said to them that his death also like his
life
an imperishable service which he rendered
"many"
By
for the forgiveness of sins.
was
to the
this
he
raised himself above the plane of all others, although
they
may
already be his brethren; he claimed for
himself an unique significance as the as the
Judge ;
Redeemer and
for he interpreted his death, like all
his suffering, as
a triumph, as the transition
ing in his disciples the conviction that he
Lord over the dead and the
is
ligion of the Gospel rests
Christ,
i.e.
upon
living.
lives
(The
re-
looking upon him, that historical Per-
God
and earth, and that God, the Judge,
and Kedeemer.
which
still
this faith in Jesus
son, the believer is convinced that
ligion
to his
and he proved his power by actually awaken-
glory,
and
The
frees
rules
heaven
is also
Father
religion of the Gospel is the re- Fr e e°sS from
men from
all legality,
which, how-
same time lays upon them the highest moral obligations the simplest and the severest and lays bare the contradiction in which every man ever, at the
—
finds himself as regards them.
demption out
men
Redeemer,
and blessed
it
life
life of
it
leads
God, leaves them in his hands, into union with the inexhaustible
Jesus Christ,
who has overcome
the world and called sinners to himself.^ 2
brings re-
of such necessities, in that
to the gracious
and draws their
But
J
gal "
a11
ity
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
18
The General Proclamation concerning
V.
Jesus Christ in the First Generation of His Adherents. Jesus Risen Lord.
i
]\j;
know Jesus
en had learned to
found him to be the Messiah.
Christ and bad
In the
first
him everything was
erations following
two gen-
said about
him which men were in any way able to say. Inasmuch as they knew him to be the Risen One, they exalted him as the Lord of the world and of history, hand
God, as the Way, the
way,
sitting at the right
Life.
Truth and the Life, as the Prince of Life and the living
Power
and the
of death
King.
new King
of a
of
existence, as the of a
Although strong individual ence, Scriptural learning
coming new kingdom. feeling, special experi-
and a fantastic tendency
gave from the beginning a form him, yet
common
Conqueror
to the confession of
characteristics of the proclamation
can be definitely pointed out. f
SSsc!pies°'
The content
2.
of the disciples' belief
eral proclamation of
it
on the ground of the certainty
of the resurrection of Jesus,
lows
:
Jesus
— he will dom,
is
come again and
God and
new community raei.
set forth as fol-
establish a visible king-
—they who believe on him and surrender them-
grace of
itself
can be
the Messiah promised by the prophets
selves entirely to this belief,
church
and the gen-
may
assured of the
of a share in his future glory.
A
of Christian believers thus organized
within the Jewish nation.
munity believed
feel
itself to
And
this
new com-
be the true Israel of the
PROLEGOMENA.
19
Messianic times and lived, accordingly, in
all their
Thus could
thoughts and feelings in the future.
all
the Jewish apocalyptic expectations retain their pow-
time of the second coming of Christ.
er for the
the fulfilment of these hopes the
For
new community pos-
sessed a guarantee in the sacrificial death of Christ,
as also in the manifold manifestations of the Spirit,
which were
upon the members upon
visible
their
entrance into the brother-hood (from the beginning
seems
this introduction
to
by have been accompanied J r
The
baptism) and in their gathering together. session of the Spirit
vidual that he
was an assurance
was not only a
God.
God
Faith in the the
Father
God
added
:
of
to each indi-
" disciple "
"called saint," and, as such, a priest Israel
to this
of Spirit,
*jjFg23f P leshl P-
but also a
and king
became
was
pos-
Possession
of
faith in
faith in Jesus,
the Christ and Son of God, and the witness of the gift of the
Christ.
Holy
Spirit, i.e. of the Spirit of
men
In the strength of this faith
the fear of the
Judge and
in trust in
rested first of all
yet
it
had
its
lived in
who had own people.
God,
already begun the redemption of his
The rproclamation
God and
concerning ° Jesus, the Christ, Preaching Based Enentirely upon the Old Testament, Old owTesta Testa'
'
starting-point in the exaltation of
Jesus through his resurrection from the dead.
To
prove that the entire Old Testament pointed toward
him, and that his person, his work, his fate were the actual
and verbal fulfilment
prophecies,
was the
of the
Old Testament
chief interest of believers, in so
far as they did not give themselves entirely to ex-
ment.
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
20
This reference did not
pectations of the future.
make clear the meaning and worth Messianic work this it did not seem to need
serve at once to of the
—
— but rather to establish
the Messiah-ship of Jesus.
However, the Old Testament, as stood,
it
was then under-
gave occasion, through the fixing of the per-
son and dignity of Christ, for widening the scope of the thought of Israel's perfected theocracy.
And,
in addition, faith in the exaltation of Jesus to the
right
hand
of
Gcd caused men
to think of the begin-
ning of his existence in harmony therewith.
Then
the fact of the successful Gentile conversion threw a
new
light
upon the scope of
significance for all
mankind.
sonal claims of Jesus led liar relation la
e
a$
rrjs
terpretation of the ever,
was the
praef.),
it
(for
anti-gnostic in-
Holy Scriptures)
came very near accepting
it
Origen, how-
;
(see,
de princip.
in the beginning of the 3d century the
i.e.
Alexandrian Church was following the Roman, and gradually became
" Catholic".
Later
still
the Syrian
churches also followed, as the documentary source of the Apostolic Constitutions proves,
nothing of the "apostolic
Only
Occidental sense.
which knows
rule of faith"
at the
in
the
end of the 3d century
did the Catholic Church become a reality through
common
the
apostolic
lex
and distinguish
sharply from the heretical parties
came
indeed, probably
first
;
itself
remote churches,
through Nicea to an ac-
ceptance of an "apostolic rule of faith."
But even
was not accepted at a single stroke. The Recognition of a Selection of Well-
the Nicene creed mtntwfuognfzed'as
B
*
knoiun Scriptures as Virtually Belonging to the
Old Testament; Scriptures
i.e.
(see
as a Compilation of Apostolic
the "Introductions to the N. T."
by Reuss, Holtzmann, Weiss)
Law and
the Prophets
churches the
Word
.
By
(rd ßißXid)
the side of the
there
was
of the Lord, or briefly "
in the
6 xuptos",
which was indisputable. The words and deeds of the Lord ("the Gospel") were recorded in numerous,
oft-revised scriptures closely related to each
other, which
were
called the
"Lord's Writings", also
— THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION. " köyia",
then
—yet not
80
after the middle of the 2d
till
— Century
" evayyiXia "
GTokmv "
these were publicly read at least after c.
;
140 (Justin).
The
and
" oxo;jyqiJ.oveo;j.ara
named
last
title
rmv
ano-
expresses the
judgment, that everything which was reported of the Lord could be traced directly or indirectly to the apostles.
Out
of these
numerous evangelical
Tatians Diatessa-
writings there were in certain churches,
already
before the middle of the 2d century, four that were
prominent
our present Gospels
—which,
e.g.,
very
soon after 160 were worked over by Tatian into a
About the same time form, more than likety in
single Gospel (Diatessaron)
they took on their
Rome.
final
.
Together with these writings the Epistles
of the apostle Paul,
which had been
were read in the churches,
i.e.
collected earlier,
by the
leaders, as
the Epistles of Clement, Barnabas, Ignatius and particularly
Poly carp
had a
pels
testify.
direct relation
While however the Gosto the kerygma and met
the requirements of tradition (Ignatius, Justin), such
was not
the case with the Pauline Epistles.
all definite
Finally
scriptural productions of prophetic spirits
(irvsufiaropopoi)
were revered as inspired Holy Scrip-
whether they were Jewish apocalypses with
tures,
high-sounding names, or the writings of Christian prophets and teachers. the Old Testament, but
The
ypa-<prf
or simply Uyei), apocalyptic verses
Of
like worth, but
tion
:
o
xbptos Xiyet
iv
was primarily
with, " 6 y.opios Xiyei" {fiypaitxat
were
different in kind,
also cited.
was the
roT evayyeXtai (fulfilling
cita-
of proph-
ron
-
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
90
ecy
—ethical rules).
Many
teachers gladly spoke in
the words of the apostle Paul, without according
them the same rank as the Scriptures and the Word of the
Lord (were the Epistles
in the churches before
Marcion,
Marcion's
who
180?).
c.
rejected the
and gave
little later,
collection of Scrip-
canonical rank (Luke's Gospel, 10
it
At
Pauline Epistles). a
Old Testament and the
new
prophetic proofs, formed a tures
Paul publicly read
of
same time probably,
the
the gnostic school leaders did the same,
favoring the writings in widest circulation
new
the churches, but with
Tatian, Encratites)
.
as dualistic.
in such circles the for they
to the front;
theological, soteriological,
The new
among
additions (Yalentinus,
Everywhere
came
Epistles of Paul
tions,
or
were
and could be interpreted
critically constituted collec-
which the gnostics
over against the Old
set
Testament, were clothed with the same authority as the Old Testament and were allegorically interpreted in
harmony with
it (still,
secret scriptures)
and the Forming
y.opto?
churches.
It
.
besides, secret tradition
Again, a reference to the
and
Ypa'
y.opio$
dcd ? did
closed
xop6$ rescued for the
New
collection.
Closed Testament there was not in the No N. T. in
churches in the 3d century
hand a second
new
collection, it
;
but where there was at
was used
virtually as the
Old Testament and no questions were raised.
The
incomplete collection served ad hoc every purpose
which, as one might think, the complete alone could serve.
Catholicism never came, however, to be a
religion of the book.
mained the standard
The words for the
of the
guidance of
the development of doctrine pursued
its
Lord life,
own
re-
and
course
3d Century.
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
94
at all times, being influenced only in a secondary
way by
Results:
Results
which
the
fol-
ceptanctof
New
New
The
(1) v '
mos * valuable it
Testament.
Testament conserved the
part of the primitive literature; but
gave over to destruction almost
all
the remaining
literature as being arrogant or corrupt; (2) the
New
Testament made an end to the production of inspired writings, but
it
New
the
and the
ecclesiastically profane
and likewise
literature possible (3)
made an
also
set fixed limits to it;
Testament obscured the historic sense
historical origin of its
own documents,
same time occasioned the necessity thorough-going study of these documents and it
of a
at the
vided for their active influence in the Church the
New
that
all
the statements in
" facts "
spiritual,
its
own documents
it
new
facts
tions
New
Testament
(5)
the
(4)
ten-
should
clear, sufficient
necessitated the learned, theological
production of ;
;
but, in requiring
;
be considered entirely harmonious,
and
pro-
Testament repressed the enthusiastic
dency to the production of
but
and mythological concepset
boundaries to the
time of revelation, exalted the apostolic age and the apostles themselves to an unapproachable height
and thereby helped requirements, but
to lower the Christian ideal it
and
likewise preserved the knowl-
edge and power of the same, and became a goad for the conscience;
(6)
the
New
Testament guarded
effectively the hesitating canonical esteem for the
Testament; but
it
likewise
made
it
Old
an offence to
exalt the Christian revelation above that of the
Old
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
95
Testament, and to brood over the specific meaning of the former;
the fatal
(7)
the
New
Testament encouraged
tendency to identify the Master's words
with apostolic tradition (teaching of the apostles), but through the acceptance of the Pauline Epistles
a standard the loftiest expression of the con-
set as
sciousness of redemption,
Paulinism
tion of
it
and through the canoniza-
introduced most valuable leaven
into the history of the
Church
;
(8)
through the claim
Church that both Testaments
the Catholic
of
longed to her alone, she robbed
the
New
be-
other Christian
all
churches of their title-right to them
made
it
;
but while she
Testament a norm, she constructed
an armory from which in the time to come the sharpest weapons have been
drawn out against
'
her-
self.
The Transformation of the Episcopal Office in the Church into the Apostolic Office. History C.
Transfor-
Episcopal Office into
of the Transformation of the Idea of the Church.
The claim that the faith
that
apostles formulated a rule of
was not sufficient; it was necessary the Church had kept the same pure and
to
show
that she
possessed within herself a living court of appeal to
decide
all
points under controversy.
Originally
men
simply referred to the churches founded by the apostles,
in
which the true teaching was and the "ancients".
fered no absolute certaint}r tullian, influenced
and
with the disciples of the
to the connection of these
apostles
to be found,
;
But
this appeal of-
hence Irenseus and Ter-
by the imposing development
of
A
lic
£S° Office.
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
96
the episcopate in
Rome and by
once' given to the apostles,
now
the ancient respect
prophets and teachers
transferred to the bishops, so conceived of the
same that the
"
ordo episcoporum per successioneni
ab initio decurrens " guaranteed
to
bility of the apostolic inheritance.
them the inviola-
With each
this
between an historical (the churches
thesis oscillated
are those founded by the apostles; the bishops are
the disciples of the disciples of the apostles)
dogmatic aspect. Apostoiic Succes sion
* er
clearly
*s
and a
Yet already with Irensßus the
prominent
:
"
episcopi
cum
lat-
episcopatus
successione cerium veritatis charisma acceperunt (the
charisma of truth depends upon the
office of
"
the
bishops which rests upon the apostolic succession)
.
is
simply a dogmatic expression for the
exalted
place
which the episcopate had already
actually
won
This thesis
inally
it
did not, moreover, orig-
any way entirely identify apostles and
in
bishops;
for itself;
it
remained also uncertain in
tion to the individual bishops for the ancient
parity:
and
its applica-
left
room
still
spiritus, ecclesia, fldeles.
Calixtus of Rome, however
(v. Tertull.,
de pudic.j
Hippol., Philos. IX.), claimed for himself full apostolic
regard and apostolic powers, while Tertullian
allowed to
him only
the locus magist er ii.
In the
Orient and in Alexandria the apostolic character
was quite late in gaining recogniIgnatius knew nothing about it (the bishop
of the bishops tion. is
the representative of
God unto
his
own
church)
and neither did Clement, and even the basal docu-
:
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION. ment
97
of the Apost. Constitutions is silent.
Yet
in
the time of Origen the doctrine began to establish itself in
The idea
Alexandria.
Church was
of the
greatly influenced by this development.
the Church
was
claims rested upon
He who
its
its
belongs
blessedness
came the
God,
hope and
its
Christian
well-ordered life
Church
the
to
sure of
is
Then the Church
his be-
visible establishment of this confession of
faith (fides in regula
posita
salutem de observatione
its
its
possession of the Spirit, upon
{Holy Church).
the apostles, and
its
est,
legis)
;
habet legem et the legacy of
it is
Christian character rests upon
possession of the true apostolic teaching (Catholic
Church in the sense of doctrine,
universality and
of
—the form of
the 2d century)
.
pureness
expression since the end of
One must be a member
one apostolic Church in order
pirical,
of this
em-
to partake of
salvation, since here alone is found that
knowledge
The Church ceased to be salvation and of the saints
which gives blessedness. the sure
communion
of
and became the condition of salvation lowing chapter).
(v.
the
fol-
This conception of the Church
(Irenaaus, Tertullian, Origen)
which represents the
development of the churches into the one definite
—a creative act, to be sure, of spirit — not evangelic, neither Church
is
it
is
the Christian it
hierarchic;
has never entirely disappeared from the Catholic
churches.
Church
Originally ^"tEST 1 D p~ the heavenly Bride of Christ, the ment
abiding-place of the Holy Spirit; and
its faith in
idea of
But almost from the beginning
it
was
in-
;
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
98 iiierarchical Church
Idea
'
fl
hierarchical Church idea. ue nced by J the
The latter
was only hinted at by Irenaeus and Tertullian (the last named finally contended against it and in this contention he even reverted to the primitive Church idea it
spiritus equals ecclesia, universal priesthood)
:
was
and other
farther developed by Calixtus
Roman
especially
priests,
by Cyprian, while the
Alexandrians blended the earliest Church idea with a mystic-philosophical conception, and Origen,
al-
though greatly impressed by the empirical Church, never Cyprian.'
lost sight of its relative significance
and
office.
Calixtus and Cyprian constructed the hierarchical
Church idea out cies
of existing relations
which these imposed
;
and the exigen-
the latter rounded out the
standard of the former, but on one point, touching the justification
the earthly character of
of
the
Church, he lagged behind, while Calixtus had resolutely
advanced to
The
chapter).
tury that
it
completion
its
crises
sufficient,
—save in isolated
—to simply preserve the Catholic faith;
one must obey the bishops in order isting
ism
to
guard the
ex-
Church against the openly proclaimed heathen-
(in practical life)
,
heresy and enthusiasm (the
The idea of the Church became supreme
primitive Christian recollections)
one episcopally constituted
and the significance
was
the following
were so great in the 3d cen-
was nowhere
communities,
(v.
left in
.
of doctrine as a
the background:
bond
of
The Church,
upon the bishops, who are the successors apostles, the representatives of
God,
is
union
resting of the
by reason
of
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
99
these fundamental facts itself the apostolic legacy.
According
to
vation {extra
Cyprian the Church
quam nulla
ized confederation.
solus)
It rests
the seat of sal-
is
as a single, organ-
,
wholly and solely upon
the episcopate, which, as the continuation of the
The union
the bearer of these powers.
individual with
E
K;
"
with the powers of the apos-
apostolate, equipped tles, is
church Rests upon
God and
Christ
of tho
therefore con-
is
ceivable only in the form of subordination to the
The attribute, however, of the unity of the Church, which is of equal significance with that bishops.
comes only through
of its truth, since the unity
manifests
it
primarily in the unity of the epis-
This has been from the beginning a unit
copate.
and
itself
love,
remains a unit
are installed by
change.
in so far as the bishops
still,
God and
continue in brotherly inter-
The individual bishops are
not only as leaders of their
own
to be considered
particular churches,
but as the foundation of the one Church
Thence
in episcopo est").
("
ecclesia
follows farther, that
it
the bishops of those churches founded by the apostles possess
no longer any peculiar dignity
(all
bish-
ops are equal, since they are partakers of the one office). '
The Roman
chair, however, '
'
a peculiar significance, since apostle
upon
tolic gifts in
these gifts
whom
Christ
it
came
was the
first
to
have
Chair.
chair of the
conferred the apos-
order to indicate clearly the unity of
and of the Church
;
and farther
also, be-
cause historically the Church of this chair was the root
and mother
of the
Roman
one Catholic Church.
In a
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
100
severe Carthaginian crisis, Cyprian so appealed to
Rome
as
if
communion with
this
was the guarantee
of the truth
the claims of the
Roman
over other churches nally,
;
Church
(its
bishop)
but later he denied
bishop to special rights
(contest
with Stephen).
Fi-
although he placed the unity of the organiza-
Church above the unity in articles of faith, the essence of Christianity was guarded by him to this extent, that he demanded of the bishops tion of the
everywhere a Christian steadfastness, otherwise they ipso facto would forfeit their as yet
knew nothing
Cyprian also
office.
of a character indelibilis of the
bishops, while Calixtus
and other Roman bishops
vindicated the same to them.
A consequence of
his
theory was, that he closely identified heretics and schismatics, in
which the Church did not then
fol-
The great one episcopal Church, which he presupposed was by- the- bye a fiction such a homo-
low him.
;
geneous confederation did not in reality exist; Constantine himself could not complete
CHAPTER
it.
III.
CONTINUATION: THE OLD CHRISTIANITY AND
THE NEW CHURCH. [See the Literature on
Montanis
tmnism?"
*•
^ HE
Montanism and Novatianism.]
denial of the claims of the ethical
life,
the
paling of the primitive Christian hopes, the legal and political
forms under which the churches protected
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
101
themselves against the world and against heresies
middle of the 2d century,
called forth soon after the first
in
nities,
Asia Minor, then in other Christian commua reaction which sought to establish, or rather
and conditions
to re-establish, the primitive times
and
to protect
Christianity from the secularizing
tendency.
The
result of
Montanist
crisis
and the
asserted itself all the
this crisis
more strenuously as a its
truth in
and objective foundation, that
new
it
legal
its historical
accordingly gave a
significance to the attribute of holiness, that
expressly authorized a double state,
a secular, it
so-called
was, that the Church
like)
which has
organization
(the
—within
exchanged
its
itself,
it
— a spiritual and
and a double morality, that
character as the possessor of certain
salvation for that other, viz. to be an indispensable
condition for the transmission of salvation and to be
an institution
for education.
compelled to withdraw (the
The Montanists were
New
Testament had
already thereby done good service), as well as Christians
who made
the truth of the Church de-
pendent upon a rigid maintenance of
The consequence was that tury two great Christian
at the
its
moral claims.
end of the 3d cen-
communities put forth
claims to be the true Catholic Church tional
all
:
viz.
the na-
Church confederated by Constantine and the
Novatian churches which we refused with the remnant of Montanism.
schism in
The beginnings
Rome go back
and Calixtus.
to the
of the great
time of Hippolyt
/&
,
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
102 M(
t
Ai
nus
^*
m
T ne Montanist
had undergone a
opposition
Originally
great transformation.
it
was
the stupen-
dous undertaking of a Christian prophet (Montanus)
who with upon
the assistance of prophetesses felt called
to realize for Christianity the rich prophetic
He interpreted these
promises of the Fourth Gospel.
in accordance with the Apocalypse,
and proclaimed
that the Paraclete had appeared in his in
whom
also Christ, yea, even
own
person,
God Almighty, had
come to his own in order to lead them into all truth and to gather together into one fold his scattered Accordingly it was Montanus' highest aim flocks. to lead the Christians forth
from their civic relations
and communial associations and
to
form a new,
homogeneous brotherhood which, separated from the world, should prepare itself for the descent of the
The opposition which
opposed by Leaders
heavenly Jerusalem.
of church,
orbitant prophetical message encountered from the leaders of the churches,
Marcus Aurelius,
and the persecutions under
intensified the already lively es-
chatological expectations
martyrdom.
this ex-
and increased the desire for
That which the movement
lost,
how-
ever, in definiteness (in so far as the realization of
the ideal of uniting all Christians plished, except for a brief period limits)
it
gained again after
the proclamation of
it
c.
was not accom-
and within narrow 180 inasmuch as
invested earnest souls with
greater power and courage,
which served
to retard
the growing secularizing tendency within the Church.
In Asia and Phrygia
many
Christian communities
;
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
103
acknowledged in corpore the Divine mission of the ^ujjfjtf prophets in other provinces assemblies were formed phry& ia -
;
in
which the current teachings
of these prophets
were considered as a Gospel, at the same time various modifications were going on (sympathies of the
The Roman bishops came near acknowledging the new prophecies). In the Montanist churches (c. 190) it was no longer a question confessors in Lyons.
of a
new
organization in the strict sense of the word,
or of a radical re-formation of the Christian organizations, but rather,
were these questions already pushed
clearly traced, aside,
The
wherever the movement can be
even when they were active and
original prophets
thusiasm
;
had
influential.
no bounds
set
to their en-
there were also no definite limits to their
high pretensions: God and Christ had appeared in
them
;
the Prisca
saw Christ
living in female form
these prophets
made the most extravagant prophecies
and spoke in a
loftier tone
tles;
than any one of the apos-
they subverted apostolic regulations; they set
forth, regardless of every tradition,
ments
for the Christian life
body of Christian believers to be the last
;
;
new command-
they railed at the great
they thought themselves
and therefore the highest prophets, the
But
bearers of the final revelation of God.
they had passed
off
after
the stage, their followers sought
an agreement with the common Christian churches.
They recognized recognized by
it.
the great
Church and begged
They were willing
selves to the apostolic regula
and
to
to be
bind them-
to the
New
Tes-
^J^d? Church.
8
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
104
tament;
they
no longer hesitated
to
ecclesiastical organization (the bishops).
accept
the
And
they
own commend as
accordingly demanded the recognition of their prophets,
whom
they
now sought
to
successors of the earlier prophets (prophetic succession)
;
the "
new " prophecy
is
really a later revela-
Church understands
tion, which, as the
it,
presup-
poses the earlier; and the later revelation pertains
simply and solely
which
it
(in addition to the
confirmation
gives to the Church teaching as opposed to
the gnostic) to the burning questions of Christian
discipline which
it
rigid observance.
the
new prophecy
more
decides in the interest of a
Therein lay the significance of for
its
adherents in the empire
and accordingly thej had bestowed their faith r
freely.
Through the belief that in Phrygia the Paraclete had given revelations for the entire Church in order to establish a relatively severe
from second marriage,
regimen (refraining
severer
fast
regulations,
mightier attestation of Christianity in daily
life,
«complete readiness for
martyrdom) the original en-
thusiasm received
death-blow.
was
after all a
its
,
But
this flame
mighty power, since Christendom
large made, between the years
at
190 and 220, the
greatest progress toward the secularization of the
Gospel.
The triumph
of
Montanism would have
been succeeded by a complete change in the ownership of the Church and in missionary operations: its
churches would have
cessions,
therefore,
(the
been
decimated.
Con-
New
Testament,
apos-
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION. tolica regula, episcopate)
did not help the Monta-
The bishops attacked the form
nists.
105
new
of the
prophecy as an innovation, threw suspicion on
ma-
content, interpreted the earlier future hopes as terialistic
mands
and sensuous, and declared the
ethical de-
to be extreme, legalistic, ceremonial, Jewish,
contrary to the
They
its
New Testament,
and even heathenish.
set over against the claims of the
to authentic divine oracles,
the
Montanists
newly formed
New
Testament, declared that every requirement was to be found in the declarations of the two Testaments
and thus clearly defined a revelation epoch, which extended to the present time only through the
New
Testament, the apostolic teaching and the apostolic office of
bishops (in this contest the
for the first time
made
tament contained
new
Testament was not prophetic, but
They began
the
New
apostolic, (2) that
apostolic dignity could not be reached .
Old Tes-
perfect, (1) that the
prophetical elements,
of the present day)
ideas were
by any person
finally to distin-
guish between the morality required of the clergy
and that required of one wife).
of the laity (thus in the question
In this
way
which had once been dear
they discredited that
to the
whole of Christen-
dom, but which they could no longer make use
of.
In so far as they repelled the alleged misuse, they rendered the thing
itself less
and
less
powerful
(chil-
iasm, prophecy, right of laity to speak, rigid sanctity)
,
without being able to entirely suppress
it.
The
most vehement contest between the parties was
in
AtÄ* Montan ism.
— OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
on
106 Heated Controver-
$&§?&!
Montanists, otherwise acknowledging the bishops,
HPSS of sin.
The
re gard to the question of the forgiveness of sin.
•
Holy
ascribed this right to the those
who possess the Holy
the Spirit
is
Spirit alone
Spirit)
,
(i.e., to
—for the power of
not necessarily attached to the
office
and recognized no human right in the forgiveness
which rested
sins,
of the Divine
donare
far
more on the
(rare)
laying hold
mercy {"potest ecclesia (spiritus)
They therefore who had committed souls to God. The
sed non faciam
delicto,,
expelled from their churches
all
mortal sins, committing their
")
.
bishops on the other hand, contrary to their principle,
of
were obliged
to
maintain that
own
baptism
alone cleanses from sin, and to vindicate the right
conveyed by the power of the keys by a reference to the apostolic
office in
order to protect the standing
of the ever less holy churches against the dissolu-
tion
which would have resulted from the
gime.
Calixtus
was the first
to
make
earlier re-
use of the right
of the bishops to forgive sins in the widest sense,
and
to extend this right
even to mortal
sins.
He
was opposed, not only by the Montanist, Tertullian, but in Rome itself by a very high ecclesiastical rival bishop (Hippolytus) The Montanists were compelled to withdraw with their "devil-prophecy", but .
they withdrew willingly from a Church which had
become
" unspiritual "
(psychic).
serted the stability of the its
Christianity.
which had the
The bishops
as-
Church at the expense of
In the place of the Christianity
Spirit in its midst,
came the Church
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION. organization which possessed the
and the 3.
Testament
spiritual office.
Meanwhile the carrying out
of the bishops in part
New
107
of the pretensions
to the right to forgive sins (opposed
by the churches and the Christian
the confessors)
and the extension
of the
heroes,
same
Bishops
Assume
to
rgi
Si ns B
eveu Ul
sins
to
mortal sins (contrary to the early practice, the early conception of baptism and of the Church) was at-
tended by great
difficulties,
although the bishops
encountered not onty the early practice of the primitive rigid discipline, but also a wide-spread laxness.
The extension of the forgiveness of sins to adulterers was the occasion of the schism of Hippolytus. After the Decian persecution, however,
it
was necessary
to
declare even the greatest sin, apostasy, as pardonable,
likewise to enlarge the ancient concession that
one capital sin after baptism might ble (a practice
still
be pardona-
founded upon the Hennas Pastor) and
to abolish all rights of spiritual persons (confessors), i.e.
to
make
the forgiveness of sin dependent upon
a regular, casuistic, bishopry action
Rome and
Cyprian) Jtf '
(Cornelius of
then was the Church Only J
.
idea radically and totally changed.
The Church
eludes the pure and the impure (like Noah's ark)
;
inits
members are not collectively holy and every one is by no means sure of blessedness. The Church, solely in virtue of
its
endowments,
is
holy (objective), and
these have actually been conferred, together with the
pure teaching, upon the bishops (priests and judges in the
name
of
God)
;
it is
an indispensable salva-
idea of
Church
^aSaf
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
108
tion institute, so that no one will be blessed
remains without; fidelium, rather
is
also societas fidei, but not
is
it
it
who
a training-school and cultusIt possesses also, in addition
institute for salvation.
to baptism, a second cure for sin, at least in practice;
was
the theory, however,
Now
tain.
time were the clergy and
sharply distinguished religiously
laity
est
for the first
confused and uncer-
still
numerus episcoporum
")
,
("
ecclesia
and the Roman
bish-
ops stamped the clergy with a character indelibilis (not
Now
Cyprian).
also
began the theological
speculation in regard to the relation of the Church,
as a
communion
of saints, to the empirical holy
Church, to the milder secularizing of Christianity Novatian Opposition
tempered by the "means of grace."
But
all this
could not be accomplished without a great counteragitation
soon
which began
among
spread
all
at
Rome (Novatian) and
the
provincial
churches.
Novatian required only a minimum, the unpardonableness of the sin of apostasy (upon the earth) other,
wise the Church would no more be
holy.
This
minimum, however, had the same significance as the far more radical demands of the Montanists two generations before. of the ancient
that a
There was in
Church
idea,
a vital remnant
it
was strange pure (katharoi)
although
Church should consider
itself
it
and truly evangelical, merely because ingness to tolerate apostates second Catholic church,
mortal sinners)
.j,
a
mg from Spam
.
(later
A second Catholic
of its unwill-
perhaps other
Church, stretch-
>
to
Asia Minor,
arose,
whose archaic
.
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
109
fragments of the old discipline, however, did not help
to
it
of life
;
become a more independent earthly system
nor did
it
really distinguish itself
other Church, although of the
same invalid
With wisdom,
from the
declared the ministrations
it
(practice of re-baptism)
and
foresight
relative severity the
bishops in these crises brought their churches around
a new
to
attitude.
As
it
was, they could use only
one bishop's Church and they learned to consider themselves rightly as
At
the
form in
pupils and as its sheep.
same time the Church had taken on a which it could be a powerful support to Besides, its inner life
the state.
organized
image
was much
better
than formerly in the empire, and the
treasure of the Gospel (the
its
was
still
ever in
its
keeping
of Christ, the assurance of eternal life, the
monotheism and piety
exercise of mercy) as once the of the Psalmists
remained alive within the hard and
foreign shell of the Jewish Church.
Note
1.
The Priesthood.
old Catholic
Church idea
is
The rounding out of the clearly manifested in the
completed development of a priestly order. ourgical priests are found
(Marcion's followers)
;
first
in the
among
Hier-
the gnostics
Church the prophets
(Didache) and the local ministers
(I.
Clement) were
formerly likened to the Old Testament priests. tullian first calls the bishop a priest,
Ter-
and from that
time until about 250 the priestly character of the bishops and presbyters
was evolved very
rapidly in the
Orient, as well as in the Occident; so strong indeed
Tb
^
r est " {j
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
110
was
the influence of heathenism at this point that an
or do of priestly assistants (lower ordination) arose The completed idea of priest (in the Occident first).
meets us first in Cyprian, in the time,
and
in the
Roman bishops of that
document which
sentatives of the
the basis of
The bishops
the Apostolic Constitutions. arily also the presbyters)
lies at
were held
(second-
to be the repre-
Church before God (they alone are
permitted to bring the offering) and representatives of
God
Church (they alone grant or with-
before the
hold the Divine grace as judges in the place of
and Christ; they are the depositaries ies,
who
JuluÖ to
system!
of the myster-
dispense a grace which they thought to be
an anointing of a materialistic appeal
God
this claim, appeal
In support of
sort).
was made increasingly
to the
Old
Testament priests and the entire Jewish cultus sysDoors and
tem, naturally in a supplementary way.
windows were thus thrown open, rights
and duties
and Judaism,
of the priests,
after that they
as regards the
toward heathenism
had disregarded the
exhortation of the aging Tertullian to return to a
common
priesthood.
-
Tithes, cleansings
and
finally
Sabbath ordinances (transferred to Sunday) were gradually established. sacrifice.
Note 2. The Sacrificial Offering. Priesthood and sacrifice condition each other. The sacrificial idea had from the beginning the widest play in the Church the
new
(see
Book
I.
Chap.
3,
Sec. 7)
;
therefore
conception of the priest must of necessit}"
influence the conception of the sacrifice, even though
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
Ill
the old representation (pure sacrifice of the spirit,
whole
sacrifice of
praise, the
remained.
This influence manifested
ways,
within the
(1)
was introduced the
Christian
received
(see
significance (see Tertul.)
complete in Cyprian.
;
of
sacrifice
etc.
even
"satisfaction"
To him
it is
self-evident that
who cannot remain
to be erased, entitle
sacrifice)
must
sinless,
the
reconcile
one to a special reward.
to penitential exercises, the
effective
fruitless)
life
two
Deeds done, where special sins are not
angry God.
and
itself in
this development appears
through penance (atoning
most
still
more and more among others Hermas) and these
a meritorious, and
the Christian,
sacrifice)
special acts of fasting, of vol-
untary celibacy, of martyrdom,
prominently
a
life
giving of alms
means (prayer without alms
.
In the writing,
De opere
is
Next is
the
barren
et eleemos.,
Cyprian has given an elaborate theory, one might alms as a means of grace which a can provide and which God accepts. Follow-
say, concerning
man
ing the Decian persecution the opera et eleemosynae
crowded into the absolution system of the Church
and secured therein a firm footing One can :
God's indulgence
—win again for
tian standing through works.
wholly ity
satisfied
himself his Chris-
men had remained
this, the entire
system of moral-
would have been encompassed by
was necessary dei,
with
If
—through
it.
Hence
it
to enlarge the conception of gratia
and not as hitherto
upon the sacrament
to
of baptism
make .
it
depend
solely
This was first accom-
Me^° ri ous Works.
;
112
Pushed, however, by Augustine;
Re-SaSin
5
nflce of
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
"
sacrifice
Christ.
also is
underwent a change in the
He
Cyprian epoch-making.
the idea of
(2)
Here
cultus.
first
clearly as-
sociated the specific offering of the Lord's Supper
with the
specific priesthood;
he
declared the
first
passio domini, and also the sanguis Christi and the dominica hostia the object of the eucharistic offering,
and thereby reached the idea
of the priestly
re-enacting of the sacrifice of Christ awtxaros xa\ zoo alparos also in the
regulations)
;
(y
-paayopä too
Church
apostolic
he placed the Lord's Supper decidedly
under the point of view of the incorporation
Church and tified
of the individual
way
in a clear
commemoration
The
with Christ, and
for the first
cer-
time that the
of those taking part in the offering
(vivi et defuncti) nificance.
of the
had a
special {deprecatory) sig-
real effect of the sacrificial
those participating was,
meal
for
however, the making of
prayers for each other more efficacious
;
for unto the
forgiveness of sins in the fullest sense this act could,
notwithstanding
all
the enrichment and lofty repre-
sentations of the ceremony, not be referred.
There-
was the re-enactment Christ remained still a mere claim
fore the claim that the service of the sacrifice of
for against the conception so closely related to the
cultus of the times, that participation in the service
cleansed from sin as in the mysteries of the
mater and
of Mithras, the fundamental ecclesiastical
principle of baptism tion.
As
magna
and repentance stood
in opposi-
a sacrificial act the Lord's Supper never
THE LAYING OF THE FOUNDATION.
113
attained to equal importance with baptism; but to
the popular imagination this solemn ritual, modelled after the ancient mysteries,
must have gained the
highest significance.
Note
3.
Means of Grace, Baptism and EuchaJ ±
That which since Augustine has been
rist.
"means
of grace
",
called
the Church of the 2d and 3d cen-
tury did not possess, save in baptism
:
According to
the strict theory the baptized could not expect any
new bestowal must rather
men
means
of
fulfil
of grace
from Christ, he
But
the law of Christ.
possessed in absolution, from the
in practice
moment when
mortal sins were absolved, a real means of grace,
whose significance was screened by baptism. upon
flection
this
means
of grace
remained as yet
wholly uncertain, in so far as the thought that absolves the sinner through the priest
by the other
(see
above)
,
Re-
was
God
crossed
that the penitential acts of
sinners the rather secure forgiveness.
The ideas con-
cerning baptism did not essentially change (Hoefling,
Sacrament der Taufe. of sins
Bdd. 1846).
2
was looked upon
Forgiveness
in general as the result of
baptism (however, here also a moral consideration entered ness
;
:
The
sins of the unbaptized are sins of blind-
therefore
it is fit
penitent from them)
necessary
now
of forgiveness.
;
8
God
should absolve the
actual sinlessness,
to preserve,
which it was
was considered
Often there
tion with the remissio
tatis the
that
is
the result
mentioned in connec-
and the consecutio
ceterni-
absolutio mortis, regeneratio hominis,
Means
of
Grace,
Ba P tism
-
OUTLINES OF THE HISTORY OF DOGMA.
114
ad similitudinem dei, consecutio Spiritus sancti ("lavacrum regenerationis et sanctificationis ") and all possible blessings as well. The restitutio
e"
Pm
,
ever-increasing enrichment of the ritual
in part a
is
consequence of the purpose to symbolize these pre-
supposed rich effects of baptism
;
in part
it
owes
its
origin to the desire to worthily equip the great mys-
An
terium.
explanation of the separate acts had
already begun (confirmation by the bishop).
The
water was looked upon as a symbol and vehicle.
The introduction
of infant baptism lies wholly in
the dark (in the time of Tertullian
it
was already
wide-spread, but condemned by him, de bapt. 18,
because he held that the cunctatio was indicated
by reason
pondus
of the act
;
Origen referred
The attempts of some to The Lord's Supper repeat baptism were repelled. was looked upon not only as an offering, but also as it
Lord's Supper.
of the
back to the apostles).
a divine gift (Monographien von Doellinger 1826,
Kahnis 1851, Rueckert
was never
whose
1856),
strictly defined,
effect,
however,
because the rigid scheme
(baptismal grace, baptismal duties) excluded such.
Imparting of the Divine per
was the
life
through the Holy Sup-
chief representation, closely connected
with purely superstitious ideas (väpnazuv
äüava<jias)
:
the spiritual and the physical were strangely mixed (the bread as y^uxrt?
communication and
Church father made a
The
realistic
alistic
became
mystical;
but
clear
C