European University Studies
Ralf M. W. Stammberger
Europaische Hochschulschriften Publications Universitaires Europeen...
11 downloads
457 Views
2MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
European University Studies
Ralf M. W. Stammberger
Europaische Hochschulschriften Publications Universitaires Europeennes
Series XXIII
On Analogy
Theology Reihe XXIII Serie XXIII Theologie Theologie
An Essay Historical and Systematic
VoI.IBd. 540
~
PETER LANG
PETER LANG
Frankfurt am Main· Berlin· Bern· New York· Paris' Wien
Europll.ischer Verlag der Wissenschaften
Die Deutsche Blbliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Stammberger, Ralf M. W.: On analogy: an essay historical and systematic 1 Ralf M. W. Stammberger. - Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Bern; New York; Paris; Wlen : Lang, 1995 (European university studies: Ser. 23, Theology; Vol. 540) ISBN 3-631-48909-9 NE: Europiiische Hochschulschriften 123
ISSN 0721-3409 ISBN 3-631-48909-9 US ISBN 0-8204-2903-1
© Peter Lang GmbH Europalscher Verlag der Wissenschallen Frankfurt am Main 1995 All rights reserved. All parts of this publication are protected by copyright. Any utilisation outside the strict limits 01 the copyright law, without the permission of the publisher, Is forbidden and liable to prosecution. This applies In particular to reproductions, translations, microfilming, and storage and processing In electronic retrieval systems. Printed In Germany 1 2 3 4 5
7
To my parents
f
7
I
Contents
CONTENTS:
\
i I \,
PREFACE
9
i i l
I. ANALOGY IN GREEK PHILOSOPHY
11
I
II. ANALOGY IN ST. THOMAS AQUINAS
20
f
III. ANALOGY IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE lWENTIETH CENTURY
36
IV. AN ATTEMPT AT A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON ANALOGY
56
BIBLIOGRAPHY (OF WORKS CONSULTED):
70
I
i
I, tI I '. r
, r
• II Greek Philosophy
I. Analogv in Greek Philosophv In this chapter I wish to establish that analogy is a basic notion both for Plato and Aristotle, the difference being that while for Plato it is a principle posited by the supreme being, the Good itself, ontologically, for Aristotle it is basic as a logical principle. It seems that the earliest traceable occurrence of a treatment of analogy is to be found in a fragment on music by the Pythagorean Archytas of Tarentum. I He uses both the terms IlEcrm and <xv<XAoytm interchangeably, thus reflecting the mathematical approach to music of Pythagoras and his school. The mathematical understanding of analogy was to prevail until Plato introduced a specifically philosophical use of analogy in his treatment of
I 47 B 2; Diels / Kranz 1951, pp.435[ C[ Track 1978, pp.630; Lyttkens 1953, p.16 and Mondin 1963, p.1 who probably misunderstands it. It seems that Track relies heavily on
Lyttkens, who appears to ignore the fact that Archytas' remarks aTe on music not mathematics, although the two were of course related for the Pythagoreans. Archytas distinguishes apte~lTt'tKa, ye(J)~ll1fpt1ca and
\)1tEva,VtlKa, av KaAEOVtl ap~IOVIKav.
TIle first two will appear again in Aristotle's treatment of analogy (and are also caned the
continuous and the discrete proportion because of their respective fonn) as a principle of justice in the Nicomachean Ethics, and can be caned strictly mathematical (e.g. for the continuous proportion a : b : c we could fill in the arguments 2: 4 : 8 => 2 : 4 = 4 : 8 => a: 2a = 2a : 4a => I = I or for the discrete proportion a : b :: c : d the arguments =
2:4
3 : 6 => a : 2a = a : 2a => I = I [Note that the transition involved in this example from
"::" - the symbolism is taken from Dalferth 1981; cf also Burrell 1973, p.IO - to U=" holds true only for mathematical proportions; on the problem see also Mascall 1949, pp.10lff; esp. pp.l08f, n.2]). TIle third describes what in Greek music was considered to be an hannonious accord, but was not strictly mathematical, and duly forgotten in the ensuing debate on analogy (e.g. 3: 4 : 6 => 3: 4 = 4 : 6 =>a : a + 1/3a = 2a - 1/3 2a : 2a => 1 = -I !). It nevertheless seems quite interesting to compare it with the division of the world into two fundamentally distinct realms in Pannenides and Plato.
12
13
Ol/Analogl'
Greek Philosophy
avaAoYla as the OEO"IlOJV KaAAI0"