Ferroelectricity The Fundamentals Collection
Edited by Julio A. Conzalo and BasilioJimknez
WILEYVCH
WILEY-VCH Verlag...
92 downloads
1777 Views
12MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Ferroelectricity The Fundamentals Collection
Edited by Julio A. Conzalo and BasilioJimknez
WILEYVCH
WILEY-VCH Verlag CmbH & Co. KCaA
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Ferroelectricity The Fundamentals Collection
Edited by julio A. Gonzalo, BasilioJirntnez
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Editors:
Julio A. Conzalo Depattainento de Fisica de Materialrs. U A M , Madrid Barilia jirndnez Research Professor. ICMM-CSIC. Madrid
All hooks piiblished by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, rditors, and publisher do not warrant the iiifbririation contained in these books, including this book, to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate. Library of Congress Card No.: Applied for
British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek
Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the internet at http://dnb.ddb.de.
0 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GinbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim All rights reserved (including those of translation in other languages). No part of this book inay be reproduced in any forin by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means - nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered namcs, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law. Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany Printed on acid-free paper Typesetting Manuela Treindl, Laaber Printing Strauss GmbH, Morlenbach Bookbinding Groi3buchbinderei J . Schaffer
GmbH & Co. KG, Grunstadt ISBN-13: 978-3-527-4486-5 ISBN-lo: 3-527-40486-4
Ferroelectricity The Fundamentals Collection
Edited by Julio A. Conzalo and BasilioJimknez
WILEYVCH
WILEY-VCH Verlag CmbH & Co. KCaA
I"
Contents
1
Foreword I 6.Jimdnez, J. A. Conzalo
2
Selected Early Work 1921-1961
2.1
Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions
5 7
J. Valasek
2.2
Rochelle Salt as a Dielectric
21
C. B. Sawyer, C. H. Tower
2.3
A New Seignette-electric Substance
26
C. Busch, P. Scherrer
2.4
Theoretical Model for Explaining the Ferroelectric Effect in Barium Titanate W P. Mason, 8. T: Matthias
2.5
Theory of Barium Titanate
42
A. F. Devonshire
2.6
The Lorentz Correction in Barium Titanate
66
J. C. S/ater
2.7 2.8
Phase Transitions in Solid Solutions of PbZrO, and PbTiO, C. Shirane, A. Takeda Dielectric Constant in Perovskite Type Crystals
80
87
J. H. Barrett 2.9
Ferroelectricity of Glycine Sulfate 90 6.T. Matthias, C. E. Mi//er,J. P. Rerneika
2.10
Switching Mechanism in Triglycine Sulfate and Other Ferroelectrics E. Fatuzzo, W.J. M e n
2.11
Crystal Stability and the Theory of Ferroelectricity
99
W. Cochran
f:rrroelectnrity: The Fimdamentals Collection. Edited by Julio A. Gonzalo and Basilio Jimenez Copyright 0 2005 WILEY-VCH Vcrlag G m b H b; Co. KGaA, Wctnhrini ISBN: 3-527-40486-4
91
27
VI
I
Contents
3
Ferroelectrics 1966-2001: An Overview R. Blinc
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.6 3.7
Introduction 105 Statistical Indicators I06 Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena 108 Ferroelectric Liquid Crystals I13 Ferroelectric Thin Films I15 Crystalline Films I15 Ferroelectric Memories and Integrated Ferroelectrics 116 Two-dimensional Ferroelectricity in Crystalline Films I18 Freely Suspended Ferroelectric Smectic Thin Films I19 Dipolar Glasses and Relaxors 121 Incommensurate (IC) Systems 125
4
Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical and Other Remarks V. L. Ginzburg
5
Theory of Ferroelectrics R. E. Cohen
6
Ferroelectric Ceramics: History and Technology C. H. Haertling
7
Tenth International Meeting on Ferroelectricity: IMF-10, a Jubilee Meeting
I05
137
155
W. Kleeman
7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4
131
A Touch of History 181 A Wealth of Science 182 A Glimpse at Spain, at Madrid and at Spanish Life and Culture Summary 185
184
181
I’
1 Foreword 13.Jimtnez, J. A. Conzalo
The prehistory of ferroelectricity, or rather, the early history of ferroelectricity, begins, as pointed out by Prof. Sidney B. Lang (BenGurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel) with the early-recordedobservation of pyroelectricity more than twenty-three centuries ago. The Greek author Teophrastus wrote that the mineral “lyngourion”(probablytourmaline) showed the property of being able to attract little bits ofwood. This property must have had something to do with the heating/ cooling of the mineral in question. More recently, in the 18thcentury, investigations of the phenomenon of pyroelectricity made a significant contribution to early researches in electrostatics. In the following century this contributions were extended to other researches in mineralogy,thermodynamics, crystal physics,etc. Piezoelectriceffects were intimately connected also with the discovery of piezoelectricity in 1880 by the Curie brothers in France, and forty years later,with the discovery of ferroelectricity in 1921 by Valasek in the US. In the second half of the 20‘’ century research in pyroelectric, piezoelectric and ferroelectric effects of materials has flourished and has found a very large number of varied applications. Amongst the thirty-two crystal classes (point groups), as it is well known, eleven
of them are characterized by having a center of symmetry, and, being centrosymmetric they cannot have a polar character, cannot be ferroelectrics. The application of an external electric field will produce displacements of the positively and negatively charged atoms in the unit cell. The resulting strain of the cell will be the same upon reversal of the electric field, showing its electrosctrictive character. The twenty-one remaining crystal classes lack a center of symmetry, they may have one or more polar axes, and (with the exception of the cubic class 4.32)show piezoelectric effects, i.e. the application of pressure causes an electric current to flow in a -certain direction, and the application of a contrary tensile stress gives rise to a flow of charge in the opposite direction. If an electric field is applied the crystal will be stretched. This makes piezoelectric crystals extremely versatile as electromechanic transducers. Such modern new tools as the Tunneling Microscope and the Atomic Force Microscope, which make possible the investigation of actual microscopic processes in crystal surfaces are allowed just by the availability of excellent piezoelectric materials. Of the twenty piezoelectric classes, as it is well known, ten have a single polar axis and they are spontaneously polarized. This
Ferroeleclricity: The Fundamentals Collection. Edited by lulio A. Gonzalo and Basilio j i m h e z Copyright 0 2005 WlLEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 3-527-40486-4
2
I spontaneous polarization is temperature I foreword
dependent, resulting in the pyroelectric effect. All ferroelectric crystals belong to one or another pyroelectricclass and have the property that an external field can reverse their polarization. Sometimes, however, the field must be extremely high to achieve in practice polarization reversal. There are many analogies between ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism as pointed out by Valasek, but there are also important differences, which set apart one physical phenomenon and the other, as might be expected. There are several criteria to classify ferroelectric crystals and the main ones were established early in the game. For many years the phenomenon of ferroelectricity was known to occur only in Rochelle Salt. Later potassium dihydrogen phosphate and a number of its isomorphs were recognized as ferroelectrics. Then during the Second World War, barium titanate, the prototype of many oxide ferroelectric perovskites to come was discovered. After this discovery and due to efforts of Matthias, Pepinsky, Smolenski and others, the number offerroelectric materials increased in a spectacular way. The need of a classification scheme for ferroelectricswas recognized and several criteria were proposed: (i) Chemical classification: ferroelectrics were classified in two groups: hydrogen-bonded (KH,PO,, or KDP, triglycine sulfate, or TGS, etc) and double oxides (BaTiO,, KNbO,, Cd,Nb,O,, etc). (ii) Number of allowed directions for the spontaneous polarization: uniaxial ferroelectrics,like triglycine sulfate or Rochelle Salt, and multiaxial ferroelectrics, polarizable along several crystallographic directions, which become equivalent in the high temperature paraelectric phase, like BaTiO,, and many perovskites. (iii) Ferroelectrics with a non-centrosymmetric high tempera-
ture phase (like KDP, which is piezoelectric above T,, the ferroelectric Curie temperature) and ferroelectrics with a centrosymmetric high temperature phase (likeBaTiO, and many other perovskites, TGS and its isomorphs, etc). (iv) Order-disorder ferroelectrics, in which permanent dipoles which are randomly oriented above the transition temperature become spontaneously ordered below T, (potassium dihydrogen phosphate, triglycine sulfate) and displacive ferroelectrics, such as many perovskites, in which reorientable dipoles in the paraelectric high temperature phase are not clearly recognizable. (Recentinvestigations however tend to soften the strict separation between both groups, i.e. between the order-disorder and the so called displacive ferroelectrics, stressing the coexistence in practice of order-disorder and displacive features in many or even in most ferroelectrics. It is pointed out that in a rigid lattice, almost undeformable dipoles may show a predominantly orderdisorder transition, while in a more deformable lattice, deformable dipoles, in which the constituent ions show clear temperature dependent displacements, can be taken as a displacive transition). Usually typical order-disorder transitions show Curie constants of the order of C = lo3 K while typical displacive transitions show much larger Curie constants, with C = los K. An effective field approach to ferroelectrictransitions (which may be generalized to include deformable dipoles) gives C in terms of the number of unit dipoles per unit volume (N) , the elementary dipole moment (p) and Boltzmann's constant (k,) as C = 4 R N p2/kB This suggests larger values for N and p in the ferroelectrics usually considered as prototypically displacive like BaTiO,. The history of the theoretical understanding of the phenomenon of ferroelectricity is one of slow progress over the years in the both fronts, the microscopic structural, lat-
1 Foreword - 6. Jimknez,I. A. Conzalo 13
tice dynamical front, and, to a lesser extent, also in the thermodynamic, phenomenological front. The crystal structure ofthe first known ferroelectric,Rochelle Salt, is so complicated that the chances of success of a microscopic theory, first attempted by Kurchatov (1933),along a line similar to that of the theory of Weiss for ferromagnetism, were very small. The statistical theory of Slater (1941),in which the arrangement of dipolar units (H,PO,) is linked by H-bonds, depicting KDP, was somewhat more successful, but only qualitatively. About twenty years later, Blinc would introduce quantum tunneling to describe the huge isotope effect in this ferroelectric. But it was the discovery by Wul and Goldman of ferroelectricity in BaTiO, (1945, 1946) followed by other perovshtes, such as KNbO, and KtaO, (Matthias 1949), LiNbO, and LiTaO, (Matthias and Remeika, 1949 and PbTiO, (Shirane, Hoshima and Suzuki, 1950), as well as the almost simultaneous discovery of antiferroelectricity in ZrTiO,, which shifted attention to the theoretical description of ferroelectric and antiferroelectric phenomena in a really much simpler structure, the perovskite structure, much more amenable to microscopic investigation. Mason and Matthias (1950) did propose a simple microscopic model to describe Ferroelectricity in BaTiO,, in which the small Ti4+ion surrounded by six oxygen ions is depicted as being in an off center six fold potential well minimum, giving rise to a unit dipole, capable of undergoing order-disorder changes under the influence of both thermal energy and the electrostatic energy of the effective local field in which the cooperative influence of all other neighboring unit dipoles predominates. This model was then strongly criticized by J a p e s , using arguments apparently plausible but, not too well founded and it was used latter as starting point for improved statistical models.
Independently, Slater (1950) pointed that the ferroelectric behavior of BaTiO, could be caused by long-range dipolar forces (via the Lorentz local effective field) competing with local short-range forces. Latter this provided the basic framework to describe the phase transition in displacivetype ferroelectrics. Mueller (1940),and later Ginzburg (1945, 1949) and Devonshire (1949, 1951, 1954) were the first to propose macroscopic, thermodynamical theories of ferroelectricity. Devonshire’s theory, which described in detail the successive phase transitions in BaTiO,, (from cubic to tetragonal, from tetragonal to orthorhombic and from orthorhombic to rhombohedral) became the paradigm of a phenomenological theory for ferroelectricity, and has remained so through several decades. In 1960 Anderson and Cochran recasted the microscopic theory in terms of crystal lattice dynamics, and predicted successfully the existence of “soft-modes”,later observed by neutron, infrared and Raman scattering. A selection of representative papers from Valasek to Cochran is given in the first section of this book. Then from the first historic International Meeting on Ferroelectricity in 1966, one can follow better the ups and downs of research in ferroelectric materials and ferroelectric transitions, through the series of International and European Meetings of which the last one was, for the moment, the 10* International Meeting on Ferroelectricity, held in Madrid in September 3 to 7, 2001. The Organizing Committee was happy to count on such distinguished speakers as Profs. Blinc, Ginzburg, Miiller for the Opening Session, which was inaugurated by the Minister of Education, Culture and Sports of Spain Dr. Pilar del Castillo,accompanied by the Chancellors of the main Universities in Madrid.
4
I
1 Foreword
To understand the impressive developments which have taken place since the discovery of Rochelle salt and then Barium Titanate to our days it is necessary to take account of the great variety and large amount of materials discovered since then presenting ferroelectricproperties, from the oxides and inorganic salts to the polymers, liquid crystals and biological tissues. This large variety of materials has made possible numerous applications of linear and nonlinear dielectric properties so that ferroelectrics constitute now a large section in the field of advanced functional materials with an important share in the market. The possibility of presenting the ferroelectric material in various forms: mono and polycrystalline, meso and nano structured, massive and thin a m , allows the use offerroelectrics in the most diverse technology applications,from devices to transform high power energy to integration in silicon electronic devices in the new technologies. In this respect it is not an exaggeration to say
that ferroelectric materials make up now a strong and well defined chapter of the Science and Technology of Materials. At the same time the ease of preparation has allowed that, not only in advanced countries but in developing countries also, competitive scientific research in these materials has been possible contributing substantially to their technologic and social development. The importance of ferroelectric materials is well attested by the series of current scientific meetings: the ISAF in the USA, the ECADP in Europe, the monographic ones regularly held in Japan and Russia. In all of them the number of contributors grows steadily. All of this foretells a promising future for Ferroelectricity and ferroelectric materials. Madrid, September 2004 ] d i o A. Gonzalo
Basilio jimtfnez
UAM, Madrid
CSIC, Madrid
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1 961 J. Valasek C. B. Sawyer, C. H. Tower G. Busch, P. Scherrer W. P. Mason, B. T. Matthias A. F. Devonshire J. C. Slater G. Shirane, A. Takeda J. H. Barrett B. T. Matthias, C. E. Miller,J. P. Remeika E. Fatuzzo, W.J. M e n W. Cochran
Ferroelectricity: The Fundamentals Collection. Edited by lulio A. Conzalo and B a s h Jimknez Copyright 0 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 3-527-40486-4
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
2.7 Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J.Valasek 17
478
J . VALASEK.
SECOND
[SERIES.
PIEZO-ELECTRIC ACTIVITY OF ROCHELLE SALT UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS. BY J. VALASEK. SYNOPSIS.
Electrical Properlies of Rochelle Salt Crystal are analogous t o the magnetic properties of iron, the dielectric displacement D and polarization P varying with the electric field E in the same general manner as B and I vary with H for iron, and showing a n electric hysteresis with loops distorted by a n amount corresponding t o the permanent polarization PO, whose value is about 30 e.s.u./cm.s but varies for different crystals. The dielectric constant ( K = d D / d E ) was measured from - 70' to 30' C. and found to be surprisingly large, increasing from about 50 a t - 70' t o a maximum of about 1,000near 0 ' . The modulus of piezo-electric activity for shearing stresses ( 6 ) varies with temperature, - 70' l o 40° C . , in a very similar manner. increasing from less than I O - ~ a t - 70° to a maximum of about 10-4 at 0'. T h e ratio 6 / K varied wilh the electrode malerial, being greater for tin foil than for mercury electrodes. The difference may be due to the alcohol used in shellacking the tin-foilelectrodes on. There are other indications t h a t 6 and K are related. The uarialion of B with humidity is such a s can be accounted for by the decrease in the dielectric constant of the outer layer as a result of dehydration. The change of polarization produced by pressure as measured by the change in the hysteresis loop agrees with the value found directly from the piezo-electric response, as required by Lord Kelvin's theory. Alsofatigue efecls on S produced by temporarily applied fields are traceable to fatigue in the polarization. The electrical conductivity below 45' is less than 5 X I O - ~ rnhos/cm.s b u t from 43' to 57' increases rapidly to 5 X 10-(. Optical Properlies of Rochelle Salt as Calculated from the Natural Pola7ization.Assuming only one electron is displaced the nalural period corresponds to a wave0 ' . the observed length of 4.2 @ and the speci/ic rotation for sodium light comes out 1 value being 2 2 O . 1 .
ECENTLY' the writer described some experiments on the dielectric and piezo-electric properties of Rochelle salt, which were made for the purpose of correlating and explaining the effects observed chiefly by Cady and by Anderson. The plates used were cut with faces perpendicular to the il axis and with edges a t 45' with the and c axes. The present paper is a continuation of the work, the variations in the electrical properties having been studied more extensively. T h e apparatus and method of observation have been already described in the paper referred to above. The niorc important results obtained at that time can be summarized as follows: In the case of Rochelle salt the dielectric displacement D, electric intensity E , and polarization P behave in a manner analogous to B, H , and I in the case of magnetism. Rochelle salt shows an electric 1
J. Valasek, PHYS. REV.( 2 ) , XVII, p. 475.
8
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1 961 2.;Ix.]
PZEZO-ELECTRIC
A C T I V I T Y OF ROCHELLE S A L T S .
479
hysteresis in P analogous to the magnetic hysteresis in the case of iron, the loops however being distorted by an amount corresponding to the permanent polaiization of the crystal in the natural state. This point of view is very effective in accounting for many of the peculiarities observed. In an electric field the piezo-electric activity has a maximum for a definite value of the field and decreases to a small value in both directions. The position of the maximum corresponds to the greatest rate of change of polarization with electric field in the case of the condenser experiments. In fact if force and electric field are equivalent in changing the piezoelectric polarization then the response for a given force in various applied fields must necessarily give curves of the same general nature as curves of aPIdE or aDlaE against E. I t is permissible to interchange D and P in most cases because of the large dielectric constant of Rochelle salt. RELATIONBETWEEN POLARIZATION AND PIEZO-ELECTRIC ACTIVITY. The activity of a piezo-electric crystal is intimately related to the natural polarization. According to Lord Kelvin this natural moment is masked by surface charges so that the crystal appears to be uncharged. This polarization or piezo-electric moment can be measured independently of the charges on the electrodes, through the distortion of the hysteresis loop. The center A of the loop is found by a consideration of symmetry and may be assumed to represent the condition of no polarization. If the natural condition of polarization is assumed to be half way between the two branches of the loop a t zero field then the value of the permanent polarization P Ois proportional to A B , Fig. I. There being
Fig. 1.
no field applied, the equation for the work done per unit charge carried through the condenser is: 4"
(+ - Po)t
= 0,
2.7 Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J. Valasek 19
480
J . VALASEK.
SECOND
[SERIES.
so that
P”F’ Qo where Qo is the apparent average permanent charge a t zero field given by Calculation gives the
A B (Fig. I) and where S is the area of the plate. value: 30 e.s.v./cm2.
According to Lord Kelvin’s theory an applied stress will change this polarization so as to create free charges on the electrodes. A force of 250 grams applied to the crystal should consequently shift the loop by an amount equivalent to the piezo-electric response for 250 grams. When this experiment was performed another, but more unsymmetrical loop, was obtained. The change in polarization by the loop method was I 14 e.s.u./cm2 while the piezo-electric response amounted to 121 e.s.u ./cm? The value of Po obtained from the hysteresis loops is only approximate because of the assumptions involved in its determination. I t cannot, moreover, be fixed definitely enough to be put down as a physical constant of Rochelle salt because it varies with different specimens, besides changing with temperature, pressure and fatigue. The valuePo = 30 e.s.u./cm.2 is thought to be a representative value and is checked by other measurements. The writer would not be surprised, however, to find other specimens giving several times this value. The change in polarization due to pressure however is derived by a differential method eliminating much of the uncertainty in measurements on one loop. T h e result i n this case should be fairly definite, as indeed it seems to be. Piezo-electric activity depends on both the crystalline structure and on the polarization. I t is greatest for a polarization somewhat larger than normal and decreases in both directions for changes in this quantity, the polarization being changed by appIying an electric field. I t has been shown by the writer that this relation between activity and applied field is approximately like that of the derivative dD/aE of the curve relating the dielectric displacement D and the electric field E of the crystal used as a condenser. Since this latter relation is in the form of a hysteresis loop it follows that the activity is also a double-valued function of the applied field depending on the direction of variation of the field. A curve illustrating this effect is reproduced in Fig. 2. The readings were taken in as short a time as possible to eliminate fatigue. These curves show that the piezo-electric response a t zero field depends on the previous electrical treatment of the crystal. The latter fact has also been noted by W. G. Cady in the report previously referred to.
10
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
E::Ix.]
PIEZO-ELECTRIC A C T I V I T Y OF ROCHELLE SALTS.
481
This after-effect does not persist very long but dies off exponentially with the time. The piezo-electric response or ballistic throw of the galvanometer for 2 5 0 grams has been observed to return to half value in I minute and to normal in over 20 minutes after fields of 150 volts have been applied for 3 minutes previously. There is a much greater aftereffect in the direction of increased activity.
Fig. 2.
A corresponding dielectric effect is indicated by the double value of the condenser charge at zero field in the hysteresis loops. This is clearly due to a fatigue in the polarization and it also dies off exponentially with time. Herein is probably found the explanation of the “storage battery effect” described by W. G. Cady who observed that after applying a field of IOO volts for some time there was, on removal of the field, a small current which decreased gradually and flowed from the crystal as from a miniature storage battery. The piezo-electric fatigue may well be a direct result of the fatigue in the polarization, as there seems to be a close relation between piezoelectric activity and polarization. I t appears that the activity is approximately proportional to the rate of change of polarization with applied field and hence proportional to the dielectric constant. An examination of the temperature variation of the two quantities leads to this conclusion. It is further confirmed as regards field variation by the fact that the relation of activity to applied field is like aDfaE vs. E where aD/aE is merely the instantaneous value of the dielectric constant K . As an approximation we can write the piezo-electric modulus 6 proportional to K : 6 = A.K.
2.1 Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J.Valasek
J . VALASEK.
If this equation were exact A would be a fundamental piezo-electric constant of the substance, being of the order of I X IO-’ between - 20’ C. and 20’ C. At some temperatures and for some exceptional specimens the relation does not seem to be so simple.
+
EFFECTOF MOISTUREON PIEZO-ELECTRIC PROPERTIES. In order to investigate the effect of dryness on the activity of Rochelle salt, some phosphorus pentoxide was enclosed in the chamber containing the crystal. The crystal soon started to dehydrate and after a few days was covered by a white coating. T h e piezo-electric throw for a load of 250 grams continually diminished. When the response was tested a t different fields a more interesting fact was observed. Besides t h e decrease in response, the maxima were displaced along the field axis into a condition of greater polarization. This is shown by Fig. 3, the curves
being taken after the lapse of the following times: (6) I day, (c) 3 days, ( d ) 12 days. The decrease in the maxima and also their displacement is in the same direction as, and may be entirely due to, the effect of different dielectric properties of the crystal and of the dehydrated layer. In other words the presence of a layer of inactive dielectric of relatively low specific inductive capacity will diminish the charge on the plates due to the polarization of the central active layer, and thus decrease the piezoelectric response. I t will also diminish the effective field across the active layer making it necessary to increase the potential difference
I”
12
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-7967
483
PZEZO-ELECTRIC ACTZVZTY O F ROCZfELLE SALTS.
' No. O L ' 5.
between the plates to produce the same field across the inner layer, thus shifting the position of maximum activity. The effects due to uniform layers can be readily calculated. Let P o be the polarization produced in the middle layer by pressure, let P 1 and PZ be the electrically induced polarizations in the dielectrics I and 2 respectively (Fig. 4). Since the dielectric displacement is solenoidal we have:
D'
= El
+ 4nP1+
4nP0 = E Z
+ 4nPz = 4nu.
Since
PI
=
(KI
-I)E~
and
Pz =
(KZ
- I)EZ
we can write
D'
Fig. 4.
+-
= K ~ E4sP0 ~ = KZEZ.
The difference of potential between the plates is zero so that, replacing Po by u O : o = Es(d - t ) Elk
+ -4"cr (d - t ) + 9(u - crop, K2
Ki
giving :
This gives us a relation between the piezo-electric response a t zero field of the crystal with the dry shell and of the same crystal before it dried. The assumption is made that the elasticity of the shell is equal to that of the crystal so that a given total force produces the same polarization in the crystalline portion. The position of the maximum will be changed to another value of total potential difference on the crystal. Let V be the total potential drop and V' be the drop across the crystalline part. When there is no dehydrated layer present V = V' = dE, where E is the field strength in the dielectric. When there is a layer of uniform thickness (d - t)/z on both faces then
V = (d
- ,)El'
+ tE',
where E" and El are the field strengths in the dielectrics 2 and tively. The dielectric displacement
D
= K~E= " K ~ E-/-' 4?rPo,
I
respec-
2. I Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J. Valasek 113
484
J. VALASEK.
SSCOXO
[SERIES.
is solenoidal, and we can eliminate E" from equations above and write:
Since the last term is small compared to the rest of the expression, this gives :
The following quantities were measured and substituted in these equations. ~1 = 1000, d = 0.22 cm., K2 = 180, t = 0.14. The quantity t is an average obtained by breaking the crystal in several places and it is probably not very accurate because of the irregularity of the outer layer. We should, however, get a rough check on the plausibility of the proposed explanation. We find that
0: = 0.24 and that
Q
E'
= 0.38.
While the values of Q'/Q and E'IE from the maxima of curves a and d of Fig. 3 are respectively 0.39 and 0.33. The agreement is not as good as could be desired even after making allowance for the difficulties in estimating t. Possibly there is a true humidity effect with respect to piezo-electric activity but the above shows, a t least, that it is quite small.
PIEZO-ELECTRIC ACTIVITYAND TEMPERATURE. In order to investigate the variation of activity with temperature, the chamber holding the crystal was immersed in COZ snow. After everything was thoroughly cooled and a t - 75" C., the chamber was allowed to heat up. Above - 35' C. an electric heater was used. It was wound on a glass jar and insulated from the crystal chamber by a felt jacket. This jar was immersed in a n oil bath to steady the heating rate while the felt eliminated any rapid changes of heating of the crystal. The current was gradually increased so as to keep the rate of heating uniformly between 10 'i a n d I O C. per minute so as to eliminate thermoelastic stresses. The temperature was measured by means of a copper-constantan thermocouple directly soldered to an electrode on the crystal. In this way the actual temperature of the crystal itself was measured.
14
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
Zp'".]
PIEZO-ELECTRIC: ACTIVITY OR ROCHELLE SALTS.
4%
When the piezo-electric response or galvanometer throw for 250 grams was measured a t the various temperatures for the first specimen the curve of Fig. 5 was obtained. This was duplicated to check the second
Fig. 5 .
maximum. At - 70" C. the piezo-electric activity is comparatively negligible. As the temperature is raised slowly the activity stays small 30" C. is reached. At - 20" C.it is rising very rapidly, reaching until a maximum a t about 0" C. I t decreases again but at 23" C. comes to a small but'sharp maximum from which it diminishes slowly, becoming very 50" C. The magnitude of the second maximum varies with small at the temperature a t which heating begins. This second maximum was found in the case of two crystal plates provided with tinfoil electrodes attached by shellac. Three other crystals were prepared with electrodes of mercury held against the crystal by two rectangular cups attached by wax. The thermocouple wires were immersed in the mercury. None of the crystals so prepared gave the second maximum. Moreover, none of them were as active as those used above. The variation of piezo-electric response of these specimens is shown in Fig. 6. The increase a t 30° to - 15"C. and the decrease at 20" C. to 30" C. are remarkably consistent. Between - 15" and 20" C., however, they each show different characteristics. These mercury electrode crystals seemed to give more constant results than the crystals with tinfoil electrodes attached by shellac. I t was then suspected that the increased response of the crystal with
-
+
+ +
+
-
2.7 Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions
- J. Valasek
115
486
SECOXD
J . VALASEK.
SERIES.
tinfoil electrodes and the presence of the second maximum was in some way due to the penetration into the crystal of the alcohol solvent of shellac. Accordingly one of the crystals originally with mercury electrodes was provided with the other type. As soon as the shellac was sufficiently dry, Curve b, Fig. 7 was obtained, the response originally
-70 -60
-S#
-t4
-JO
-8b -/O q6UR-C
7.
0
/o
20
J0
+x
T€,rf-K447UN
Jlnr CRIJTAL - pwfcwur TncArnEffT
Fig. 7.
having followed Curve a. The sensitivity increased seven-fold a t some temperatures but there was no second maximum. In two weeks the characteristics had changed to those shown in Curve c, seemingly checking the suspicion that alcohol was responsible for the second maximum and for the increased sensitivity. I t would be interesting to use alcohol cup electrodes and investigate the continuous effect of alcohol soaking into the crystal. T:ie effect is probably not chemical.
16
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961 'OL.
No. 5.
PIEZO-ELECTRIC A C T I V I T Y OF ROCHELLE SALTS.
387
In a paper on the piezo-electric effect on Rochelle salt, A. M. Nicolson' describes a method for desiccating the crystals by soaking in alcohol and heating, thus making them stronger and more sensitive. T h e writer is certain, from his work on the subject, that complete desiccation will make the crystal entirely inactive. In the above method, apparently, the treatment is not prolonged enough to completely dehydrate more than a shell around the crystal and its effectiveness may be connected with the penetration of the alcohol into the crystal. T h e heating a t 40' C. may also be effective in allowing a rearrangement and recrystallization of some of the molecules or groups not properly oriented. W. G. Cady, as well as the writer, has observed that heating the crystal will usually increase its sensitivity permanently, although sometimes the reverse is true. An interesting side-light on the temperature variation of piezo-electric activity is offered by a study of curves like t h a t of Fig. 2 but at different temperatures. They show that the effect of temperature is not so much to change the piezo-electric activity a s to shift the position of the maximum from one value of the field to another. This is probably connected with the variation of the dielectric constant with temperature which will be taken up presently. The charging throws of the crystal used as a condenser show variations similar to those of the activity except that they do not tend to zero but to a constant value a t the lower temperatures. The crystals giving the second maximum on the piezo-electric curve show a similar peculiarity here. The crystals with the mercury electrodes give more regular curves. A t 20' to 25' C. the crystals of both types begin to conduct, causing a steady drift of the galvanometer. Experiments seem to indicate that Ohm's law holds a t least approximately. T h e conduction was a t first thought to be electrolytic because of the manner in which Rochelle salt melts. Instead of real melting it appears t h a t the crystal dissolves in its water of crystallization which is set free at 55' C. The desiccated crystal, however, decomposes into a tarry product and emits heavy white fumes above 150' C., without melting. The dehydrated crystal also begins to conduct above 20' C., making it probable t h a t electronic and not electrolytic co-nduction is observed. Measurements of conductivity were made on the natural crystal a t various temperatures up to its liquefying point. T h e values obtained after the conductivity was sufficiently large to use a Wheatstone bridge are as follows: ' A . M. Nicolson, Proc. Am. Inst. Ele. Eng., Vol. 38. p. 1315 (1919).
2. I Piezo-electric Activity of Rochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J.Valasek 117 SECOND
. I . VALASEK.
488
[SERlES.
TABLE I. Temperature. Coadqctivity. Less than 43' C... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Leu3 than 0.5 X 10-8 mhos/crn3. 43 .................... 0.5 x 10-8 45 .................... 1.0 x 10-8 47 .................... 0.3 x 10-7 .................... 49 0.5 x 10-7 51 .................... 0.5 x 10-0 53 .................... 0.6 x 10-4 .................... 1.7 x 10-4 54 57 .................... 5.0 x 10-4 Greater than 57 .................... 5.0 x 10-4
A t temperatures below 20' the dry crystal is a fairly good insulator ~ oo C. The having a specific conductivity of 5 X I O - ' ~ r n h ~ s / c m .at conductivity decreases slightly a t still lower temperatures. In all these measurements the surfaces were thoroughly dried by the presence of phosphorus pentoxide in the crystal chamber.
TABLE11.
_ _
-. -
-~ .__ ~
Dielectric Constant.
Temp. Cent.
I --
-70 . . . . . . . . . . -50 . . . . . . . . . . -30 . . . . . . . . . . -20 . . . . . . . . . .
-10.. . . . . . . . . 0.......... 10 . . . . . . . . . . 20 . . . . . . . . . . 30 . . . . . . . . . .
l A
Piezoelectric Modulus. B
_ I _ _ _
71 85 140 386
1,100 688 423
42
1 ~
146 $0 252 924
928 645 i 146 Conduction conimences
I
0.041 X lo-' 0.068 " 0.41 '' 5.4 " 18.9 " 22.9 I' 18.9 "
13.5 2.2 0.41
" "
''
0.017 x 10" 0.017 0.065 1.08 6.07 6.75 7.42 8.10 1.08 0.41
'I
" " " " " " 'I
"
Table 11. gives values of the dielectric constants for a field changing from o to 880 volts/cm. and of the piezo-electric modulus 814 for shearing stresses of 2 2 0 grams/cm.2. The modulus &4 is defined by the relation given by Voigt ul = - &4YZwhere ul is the surface density of charge and Y,is the shearing stress producing it. The given values are thought to be the most representative in each case. They are subdivided into two classes, according to whether the electrodes were tinfoil attached by shellac (column A ) or mercury in direct contact with the crystal (column B ) . The former method is the most convenient to use in general practice, but the latter is thought to give more exactly the properties of Rochelle salt in the direction of the & axis. The dielectric
18
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961 ‘OL‘ 5. No.
PIEZO-ELECTRIC A C T I V I T Y O F ROCHELLE SALTS.
489
constants are surprisingly large, a fact noticed by Pockelsl who supposes that this is due to “internal conductivity.” The writer however has measured separately the conductivity a t these temperatures and is of the opinion that this is a true dielectric constant arising from polarization of the dielectric, and for this reason being so closely related to the piezoelectric effect. Because of the relatively low specific inductive capacity of the desiccated crystal it is thought that the high specific inductive capacity of Rochelle salt is partly due to the water molecule.
MAGNETICANALOGY. There seems to be a strong analogy between the behavior of Rochelle salt as a dielectric possessing hysteresis and having an exceptionally large dielectric constant, and the phenomena of ferromagnetism. Accordingly some of the features of Weiss’s theory of magnetism may find their counterpart in the phenomena in Rochelle salt. Weiss2 plots the susceptibility against the reciprocal of the absolute temperature and finds that the curve may be represented by a succession of straight lines. He interprets the sudden changes in slope as due to changes in the number of magnetons. If the data of Figs. 8a and 12 are plotted against the reciprocal of the absolute temperature one likewise gets what may be considered to be a succession of straight lines. Actually however there occur rounded corners where the curves suddenly change direction. This may be due to slight non-uniformity in heating which occurred in spite of the precautions taken. I t is considered that the straight portions are a t least as definite as those shown in Weiss’s paper. The most abrupt 20’ C. These may accordingly be changes are a t - 20’ C. and a t considered as the “Curie points” in Rochelle salt.
+
RELATIONTO OPTICALPROPERTIES. Some of the optical properties of Rochelle salt can be at least approximately found from the electricaI data given. In the course of this calculation it is of course necessary to introduce some assumptions notably as to the nature of the permanent polarization. If one knew just how the permanent polarization was ptoduced he could find the free period of this mechanism. The data needed are the force per unit displacement f and the mass m of that part of the molecule. The wave-length corresponding to the free period is given by the expression
c
being the velocity of light. 1
Pockels, Lehrbuch der Krystaloptik, p. 508.
* P. Weiss. J. de Physique, Vol. I . p. 968 (1911).
2.1 Piezo-electric Activity ofRochelle Salt Under Various Conditions - J . Valasek 119
J . VALASEK.
490
SECOND
[SERIES.
Let us assume for simplicity that only one electron is involved in the creation of the permanent moment. T h e quantityf can be derived from the value of the permanent moment Po = 30 e.s.u./cm.2 and from the displacement of the electron producing it. Since the force on an electron inside a dielectiic of polarization Po is roughly equal to QPoelthe expression for the wave-length may be put in the form:
x
=
2*c
dg*
The value of d , the displacement of the electron, can be found as follows: Taking 30 e.s.u./cm.2 as the natural polarization, the moment per molecule is obtained by dividing by the number of molecules per c.c., the result being 7.1 x I O - ~e.s.u. ~ I n each of these molecules there are 140 electrons, this being the sum of the atomic numbers of the constituent elements in Rochelle salt. If we suppose as above t h a t only one of these is effective in producing the piezo-electric moment, its displacement from the center of force of the rest of the molecule will be d = 2.7 x IO-" cm. I t would of course be more reasonable to suppose that a t least several of the electrons are displaced by different amounts, and to the extent that we do this the value calculated above becomes smaller. IJsing these values of POand d for the simple case treated above we find for the wave-length the value: X = 4.2 p .
Coblentz2 shows the presence of fairly strong absorption in this region of the infra-red. This may, however, be due to the water of crystallization and not to the cause cited above. These two possibilities should be distinguishable experimentally because the character of the absorption due to these electrons should change greatly with the temperature, as the piezo-electric elasticity or force per unit displacement of the electrons changes. The natural period as found above should be the same as that involved in rotatory dispersion formulz, since both the piezo-electric effect and optical rotation are due to an unsymmetrical or twisted structure of the molecule. J. J. Thornson3 gives an approximate formula for the specific rotation, namely: e2dp2 P
=
m
1
H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, p. 306.
2
W. W. Coblentz, Infra Red Spectra, Vol. J. J. Thornson. Phil. Mag., Der.. 1920.
2,
'
p. 38.
20
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1 967
"".I
"OL. No. 5.
PIEZO-ELECTRIC ACTIVITY OF ROCHELLE SALTS.
491
in which e is the charge of the electron, c is the velocity of light and M and m are the masses of the molecule and of the electron, d is the radius of the molecule, fi is the free period, and n is the frequency for which p is to be calculated. Using the value of p derived from piezo-electricdata we find for sodium light the specific rotation of the order of magnitude of IO', the tables giving 22.1'. Considering the fact that so little is known of the structure of the Rochelle salt molecule, the approximation is fair. The writer is indebted to Professor W. F. G. Swann, who initiated this research and gave many helpful suggestions, and to Dr. W. R. Whitney, Director of the Research Laboratory of the General Electric Company, whose presentation of two beautiful crystals made the work possible. PHYSICAL 'LABORATORY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA.
2.2 Rochelle Salt as a Dielectric - C. B. Sawyer, C. H. Tower
FEBRUARY I , 1930
PHYSICALREVIEW
VOLUME 35
ROCHELLE SALT AS A DIELECTRIC BY C. B. SAWYER A N D C. H. TOWER THEB R ~ ~ LABORATORIES, SH CLEVELAND (Received November 6, 1929) ABSTRACT Both saturation and hysteresis appear in Braun tube oscillograms made a t various temperatures with a condenser whose dielectric consists of Rochelle salt slabs cut perpendicular to the a-axis. The dielectric constant for such slabs may reach a value of 18,000. Curves are also given, showing the variation in mechanical and electrical saturation with temperature. These correspond in only a general way to the piezoelectric constant’s variation with temperature. Certain marked peculiarities are noted in the resulting mechanical deformation when Rochelle salt is excited with alternating potentials. Clear Rochelle salt half-crystals have been produced up t o forty-five centimeters in length.
THE
remarkable physical properties of Rochelle salt, the most piezoelectric active of all crystalline substances, have been reported by other authors.’ Comparatively small plates and few crystals were used in their determinations. Work a t this laboratory has been carried on for a number of years on Rochelle salt with a view towards commercialization. I t has, therefore, been necessary to produce large clear crystals in quantity. Clear, flawless half-crystals are grown up to 45 cm in length and 2 kg in weight. The dielectric strength and insulation value of plates from such crystals is very high. Many hundreds of plates (mostly perpendicular to the a-axis of the crystal) have been produced and their electrical properties measured. Thus a Rochelle salt plate 4.75 mm thick shows a dielectric constant of 18,000 when tested a t 15OC at 60 volts 60 cycles alternating current. The highest previously reported value which has come to the attention of the authors is about 1380.2 An air condenser of area and capacity equal to that of the crystal plate would have a plate separation of only 0.00475 mm, if 1380 be taken as the crystal dielectric constant; and 0.000262 mm (0.0001”) if 18,000 be taken. I t is thus evident that a comparatively thin layer of cement or dehydrated Rochelle salt between the body of the crystal and the foil electrode will introduce a very large error in the determination of the dielectric constant. A n y adhesive such as balsam in xylol, Japan Gold size, or beeswax dissolved in benzol with a small addition of rosin, may be used in dilute solution for atttaching the foil. I t is important, subsequently, to 1 Frayne, Phys. Rev. 21,348 (1923); Isley, Phys. Rev. 24,569 (1924); Laureyand Morgan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 46, 2192-6, (1924); Pockels, Encyklopadie der Math. Wiss. Vol. 5, Part 2; Valasek, I’hys. Rev. 17,475 (1921); 19,478 (1922); 20,639 (1922) and 24,560 (1924). Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik, Chap. 8, Leipsig (1910). 2 Valasek, Phys. Rev. 19, 488 (1922).
269
I
21
22
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-7967
270
C. B. SAWYER A N D C.
H. TOWER
rub down the foil very thoroughly to bring it as close to the crystal surface as possible. A series of Braun tube oscillograms was obtained. For this purpose, and for all other results reported in this paper, a crystal plate wasemployed measuring about 8.5X5.5X0.5 cm, cut with its plane perpendicular to the
m7+
7
130 volts
60 cycles
I
1
I
I
I
Fig. 1. Schematic connection of Braun tube. Capacity of crystal plate 0.004 t o 0.2 M f ; of C 0.7 Mf. R110.45 rnegohms; R,==3180 ohms; R,==31800 ohms.
a-axis, and its long edges parallel to the c-axis. All measurements and oscillograms were carried out with 60 cycle current from the power tines. All vertical deflections are on the same scale as in Fig. 2. Fig. 1 shows the connections employed with the Braun tube for obtaining crystal oscillograms. At the left is a resistance acting as a voltage divider. To the right is the crystal plate under test, connected in series with a con-
1161 v. per cm 387 v. per cm Restrained Fig. 2. Oscillograms of crystal plate, free and restrained. Temperature 15" C; frequency 60 cycles per 8ec.
denser giving voltages proportional to the charge on the crystal. The resulting oscillograms, such as shown in Fig. 2, have ordinates proportional to crystal charge and abscissae proportional to applied voltage. Fig. 2 shows comparative oscillograms of a plate when entirely free, and of the same plate restrained by cementing it between two thick aluminum
2.2 Rochelle Salt as a Dielectric
- C.
B. Sawyer, C. H. Tower 123
ROCHELLE SALT A S A DIELECTRIC
271
plates, thus very largely precluding mechanical motion due to piezo-activity. The left-hand vertical pair is for 387 peak volts per cm ; the right-hand vertical pair is for 1161 peak volts per cm. The upper pair is unrestrained; the lower pair is restrained. Dielectric constants calculated from these oscillograms show exceedingly interesting and suggestive values: from the lefthand oscillogram (restrained plate) about 430;from the left-hand oscillogram (free plate) in the saturated range about 330; from the same oscillogram for a complete cycle, excluding saturation range 10,500; and for maximum instantaneous value not less than 200,000. Such enormous values of the dielectric constant in connection with less efficient foiling of the crystal plates, may account in part for the previously observed storage battery effect. Supplementary tests indicate that little
15" 0" -8" Fig. 3. Hysteresis and saturation of Rochelle salt plate 11. Potential gradient in dielectric 387 (peak) volts per cm; frequency 60 cycles per wc.
change in the value of the dielectric constant is to be looked for as a result of improvement in foiling. I n these supplementary tests, electrodes of saturated Rochelle salt solution were used and results did not differ significantly from those obtained from a carefully foiled plate. Moreover these large values of the dielectric constant of Rochelle salt have been observed in many hundreds of plates of various dimensions from many different crystals. Determination of the dielectric constant was usually made by applying 112 volts of 60 cycles alternating potential to the free crystal plate and noting the resulting current. In addition, circuit resonance and condenser substitution methods served to check this first method, all three giving results in substantial agreement. Fig. 3 comprises a series of comparative oscillograms made from the same crystal plate a t different temperatures as indicated. Proceeding from top
24
I
2 Selected Early Work 19221-7961
272
c. B .
s.4 W Y E H A N D
c. €1. TOII’ER
left to bottom right it is evident that as the temperature is decreased both the voltages and charges required for saturation greatly increase. So also do the areas of the hysteresis loop. Here again the method of applying the foil electrodes to the crystal isof great importance as the shape and area of the loop will vary somewhat with this factor. All of the oscillograms were made with the greatest care. A second crystal plate gave results identical with the first. Two other plates of the same dimensions as before but with their long edges cut a t 45’ to the c-asis, showed no essential differences in the derived oscillograms. Though no special humidity precautions were observed, the resistance of the plates, at 100 volts constant potential, never fell below many megohms.
Fig. 4. Temperature variation of saturation effect and piezoelectric constant.
If a standard plate-its long edge being cut parallel to c-axis-is electrified with an alternating potential, it will be deformed and such deformation can be observed and measured conveniently with a microscope. For the results shown in Fig. 4, one short edge of the plate was cemented to a large lead block and various values of 60 cycle potential were applied to the electrodes. Th e alternating motion produced under these conditions lies i n the plane of the plate and is perpendicular to the c-axis. T h e relation between total deformation and electrification is shown for various temperatures. Saturation is again in evidence and saturation values again increase greatly with decrease in temperature. Keeping close pace with it is the voltage required to produce saturation. But i t is very noteworthy t hat considerable voltage must be applied before the crystal shows appreciable deformation.
2.2 Rochelle Salt as a Dielectric - C. 6. Sawyer, C. H. Tower 125
ROCHELLE SALT A S A DIELECTRIC
273
Fig. 5 shows the close relationship existing at different temperatures between: Ist, volts per cm required for mechanical saturation; 2nd, the energy loss per cubic centimeter per cycle; 3rd, the charge per cubic centimeter required for electrical saturation. Though not shown in this figure, these curves are followed closely by those of the voltage required for electrical saturation and of the deformation a t mechanical saturation. N o determina-
Fig. 5. Properties of Rochelle salt at various temperatures.
tions of the piezoelectric constant were made, but Valasek’s3 most recent curve of t h e temperature variation of the piezo-electric constant is included for the sake o f comparing temperature variation of this property with those of the others. I t has been the great privilege of the authors to carry on this work begun under the very able leadership of the late Charles F. Brush, Jr.
3
Valasek, Science \‘ol. LX\’ No. 1679, p. 235 (1927)
26
I
2 Selected Early Work 15)21-1961
2.3 A New Seignette-electric Substance
C.Busch, P. Scherrer, Natuuisss. 23, 737 [7 935)
pared to those of the Seignette salt but the main behaviour is completely analogue. A purely qualitative test of the piezoelectric activity until liquid air temperature using the method of GIEBE and SCHEIBE gave for the magnitude of the piezoelectric module d,, a parallel behaviour to tj3,. Moreover, it was proved by means of DEBYESCHERRER pictures' at room temperature and at liquid air temperature that there were no relevant structural changes at the higher Curie point. The crystals were obtained from a saturated solution of KH2P0,at its boiling point by slowly lowering the temperature. The investigated objects were small plates of about 1 cm2in surface and 1 mm thickness, Aluminium foils were glued on these plates as electrodes. The dielectric constant measurements were performed in a capacity bridge and the temperature was estimated by a copper-constantan thermocouple. Further investigations, i.e. field intensity dependence and temperature behaviour of the piezoelectricity in KH,PO, and in the isomorphs NH,H,PO,, KH,AsO, and NH,H,AsO, are in preparation. The measurements below liquid air temperature were performed in Charlottenburg, because in Zurich there was no liquid Hydrogen at our disposal. We would like to thank especially Herr Prof. STARK, president of the Physikalisch-Technischen Reichsanstalt in Berlin, for his friendly collaboration, he provided us with the necessary quantity of liquid Hydrogen. In the same way we feel us obliged to thank Herr Prof. WESTPHAL and specially Herr Dr. J. ENGL for providing us a working place in the Physical Institute of the Technische Hochschule in Charlottenburg.
The anomalous physical and the technically very interesting dielectric and piezoelectric properties of the Seignette salt have been until now only observed in mixed crystals of Potassium-Sodium-tartrate and Potassium-Ammonium-tartrate. In order to clarify more deeply the so called Seignette-electric properties, it would be very valuable to know more substances showing analogue electric properties but having, if possible, a much simpler structure than that of the Seignette salt. Among others, the question whether water of crystallization is necessary or not for the existence of these well known anomalies is of special interest. Systematic investigations based on theoretical models have led now to a new material which dielectric constant shows a similar temperature behaviour to that of the Seignette salt. It is the primary Potassium Phosphate (KH,PO,), it forms tetragonalscalenohedric crystals and has no water of crystallization.The main dielectric constant 6,, of this material is very interesting, which is measured along the crystallographic caxis. Fig. 1 shows its temperature dependence as obtained in measurements with 50periods alternating current and a field intensity of about 1000 Vlcm. At room temperature 6,, has a value of about 30, increases rapidly from -So", reaches about 130" a maximum value of about 155, that will be retained until about -190", at about -200" follows a steep decrease to a value of about 7. Similarly to Seignette salt, two Curie points, at about -130" and -195" can be Zurich, Physikalisches Institut der Technidetected. Both points are marked as el and schen Hochschule, 2Gh August 1935 e2 in the Fig. The absolute values of the dielectric constant are clearly smaller com- G . Busch, P. Scherrer 1. Made by the candidate rer. nat. (PhD student) 1. Frei. English version: Dr. rer. nat. Rafael J . Jimknez Riob6o
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric Efect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, 6. T. Matthias 127 PHYSICAL
REVIEW
VOLllME
74.
NUMBER
11
DECEMBER
1.
1948
Theoretical Model for Explaining the Ferroelectric Effect in Barium Titanate W. 1'. MASONA N D B. T. MATTHIAS Bell Telephone Laboralmics, Murray Hill, New Jersey (Received August 26, 1948) In order to explain the properties of a barium titanate single domain crystal, a previous theory of the ferroelectric effect in rochelle salt has been extended to the three-dimensional structure of barium titanate. This involves six equilibrium positions and results in significant differences from the single bond type of structure of rochelle salt. The theoretical features considered a r e a calculation of the spontaneous polarization as a function of temperature, the dielectric constants along the a = y and C = Z axes as a function of temperature, the relaxation of the dielectric constant at high frequencies, and the hysteresis loops. All of these features are explained by the three-dimensional model considered here.
IN
a previous paper,' a theoretical explanation was given for the ferroelectric effect in rochelle salt, which depended on the motion of a hydrogen nucleus between the two equilibrium positions of a hydrogen bond. I t is the purpose of this paper to show that the principal features of the barium titanate single domain crystal can be explained by a n extension of this model to the threedimensional structure of barium titanate involving six equilibrium positions. I. EXPERIMENTAL DATA
Barium titanate above the transition temperature of 120°C has the cubic cell shown by Fig. 1. The barium atoms occupy the corners of the cell, the oxygens the face-centered positions, while the titanium is usually pictured as being in the center of the cell. As a matter of fact, it probably makes 3 covalent bond with one of the face-centered
0 - BARIUM
- OXVLLN
-
uNlT CELL FOO BARIUM TITANATE
TlTANlUY
ASOVL 120 C
FIG.1. Unit cell for barium titanate.
' W. P. Mason, Phys.
Rev. 72, 854 (1947).
oxygens and is displaced in the direction of that oxygen by about 0.16AZ from the center of the cell. Above 120°C the thermal energy is sufficient to cause any one of the six positions to be equally probable and the cell appears to be cubic from x-ray measurements. Below 120°C thermal energy is no longer sufficient to cause any position to be equally probable, and most of the molecules in a given region or domain line up along one of the six directions, a dipole moment develops in that direction and the crystal becomes ferroelectric. The axis along which the titanium has been displaced becomes larger than the other two, as shown by the x-ray measurements of Miss Megawa (as shown by Fig. 2) and the crystal changes from cubic to tetragonal form. The dielectric measurements of multicrystalline ceramics, multi-domain crystals, and single domain crystals all show the presence of a ferroelectric material below 120°C. Dielectric displacement-electric field curves occur in the form of hysteresis loops. The dielectric constant at low field strengths for multicrystal ceramics,' as shown by Fig. 3, rises to a high value at the temperature of 120°C. Above 120 degrees, the dielectric constant follows a Curie-Weiss law approximately, and the dielectric constant decreases inversely as the difference between the tempera8 This value for the displacement of the titanium atom from the center of the unit cell has recently been measured by x-ray methods by Gordon Danielson, Phys. Rev. 74,
986 .. (1948).
'H: D:'Megaw, Proc. Roy. Soc. 189, 261-283 (1947). ' Von Hippel, Breckenridge, Chesley, and T i m , Ind. Eng. Chem. 38, 1097-1109 (19%).
1622
28
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1967 FERROELECTRIC
EFFECT IN BARIUM
ture and the Curie temperature or c = co+
CI(T- To) t
TITANATE
1623
Data on Unit Cell Axea of Barium Titanale an a Function d Temperature (Data from H. D. Meraw).
(1)
where co is the constant dielectric constant for temperatures much higher than the Curie temperature. C is a constant, T the temperature, and TOthe Curie temperature. Below the Curie temperature the dielectric constant decreases from its high value to a value of about 350 near absolute zero. The steady decrease is interrupted a t two temperatures 10°C and -7OOC. A t these temperatures no discontinuities occur in the axis length and hence these points cannot be associated with a change in dipole moment and hence with the position of the titanium nucleus. I t has been suggested by Matthias and von Hippel' that these are due to a change from octahedral bonding of the titanium atom to a hybrid type of bonding which may become more probable at the lower temperature. Since this does not involve a n apFIG.2. Cell dimensions as a function of temperature. preciable change in the position of the titanium nucleus, this appears to be a reasonable suggestion. As the result is a small second-order change (unpublished).' A t 23.7-centimeter wave-lengths, in the dielectric constant, it is neglected in the the former found a dielectric constant and tans of theory presented here. r=1250 t o 1420, t a n s i 0 . 2 , (2) The dielectric constant for multidomain crys- while at 1.25 centimeters Yager found a dielectric tals is not too different from those for the multicrystalline ceramics. Figure 4 shows the measurements of Matthias and von Hippel' for the a and c axes. The dielectric constant along the a axis is higher than that along the G axis. The lowering of the Curie point is probably caused by the impurities introduced. By introducing larger z amounts of mineralizers, single domain crystals s of a relatively large size have recently been grown, and these show a very marked difference between the dielectric constants along the two axes. As shown by Fig. 5, the dielectric constant along the c axis is less than that for a ceramic material. When the dielectric constant along the a axis is measured over a frequency range, a relaxation TCUURATURE IN bCCRCCS C E N T l G l l C f occurs at about 15 megacycles and the dielectric FIG. 3. Dielectric constant of barium titanate ceramic as constant drops t o about 1200 or less, as shown by a function of temperature. Fig. 6. A similar relaxation in the dielectric con' The dielectric constants of barium titanate ceramics stant of the ceramic occurs at about loocycles as have recently been measured at 1.5 megacycles and 9450 shown by the measurements of Nash8 and Yager megacycles over a temperature range from 20'C to 160°C 0
'B. T. Matthias and
A. von Hippel, Phys. Rev. 73,
1378-1384 (1948). D. E. Nash, r., J. Exper. Theor. Phys. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 17, 537 h941).
by J. G . Powles of Imperial College of Science and Technology. The results are described in a note Sent to Nature. From the variation of the relaxation frequency with temperature, one can calculate that the achvation energy is 3.65 kilocalories r mole in fair agreement with the value found in Eq. (63r
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explainingthe Ferroelectric Effect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, B. T. Matthias 129
1624
W . P . M A S O N A N D B . T. M A T T H I A S
7000
boo0
c
5000
t' z do00 U U
5 3000 c Y
w 0
2000
1000
0
-1bO
-120
-80 -40 0 40 TEYCCRlTURE IN DECREES C
80
120
FIL 4.
Dielectric constants for the two crystallographic axes for multi-domain crystals of barium titanate.
constant of approximately c=250 to 320, tan6k0.70.
(3)
From these measurements it can be calculated that the dielectric constant has a relaxation frequency of about 6.2 X loocycles. The relaxation of the dielectric constant a t these frequencies shows definitely that the high dielectric constant is due to a temperature movable dipole rather than a high dielectric constant of the type due to the near vanishing of the factor (1 - f l y ) in the dielectric equation r-1
-=-
4*
N I / N 2=eBIkT
(4)
where y is the polarizability and fl the Lorentz fartor, since the polarizability y due to electrons, ions and atoms should not vary with frequency up to the infra-red frequencies. Hence, a temperature variable dipole of the type discussed in the next section is required to give a relaxation frequency as low as 15 megacycles.
(5)
where E is the potential difference between well 2 and well 1, k is Boltzmann's constant and T the absolute temperature. Suppose now that all the minima of Fig. 7 have initially the same potential, which is set equal to zero. Then if we apply a field E. in the z direction, a polarization P. in this direction results. This polarization causes an internal field F of the Lorentz type given by the equation
F=E+BP
y
1-fly'
1 to position 2 directly across the unit cell, the form of the potential barrier may be as shown by Fig. 8 in which AU represents the height of the potential curve at the center with respect to that at the minima. If the nucleus went directly from position 1 to position 3, it would in general have to cross a higher potential barrier than AU, but equilibrium between the two positions can be established by the nucleus jumping to a position slightly to one side of the center in the direction 3 and hence it is thought that the potential barrier determining the relaxation frequency for a 1 to 3 jump will not be much higher than for a 1 to 2 jump, namely A U. For low frequencies, i.e., for frequencies well under the relaxation frequency, equilibrium values can be calculated by using Boltzmann's principle that the equilibrium ratios of numbers of nuclei in two potential wells are in the ratio
(6)
where fl is 4r/3 for an isotropic material but will be much less than this when the titanium nucleus comes close to the oxygen atom. The total polarization consists of a part P. due to electrons and atoms and a part Pd due t o the dipole caused by the displacement of the titanium nucleus from,
11. SPONTANEOUS POLARIZATION AND
DIELECTRIC CONSTANT UNDER EQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS
The model considered here is the one shown by Fig. 7. Here there are six potential minima in the direction of the six oxygens which are displaced a distance 6 from the center of the unit cell. If the titanium nucleus is taken from a position such as
FIG.5. Dielectric constants for a single domain crystal.
30
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
FERROELECTRIC
EFFECT IN BARIUM
TITANrZTE
162.5
the mid-position of the unit cell. The dipole moment introduced by this change is
(7
p = 4e6,
since the valence of the titanium is 4 for the structure, e is the electronic charge, and 6 the distance the titanium nucleus moves in going from the center of the unit cell to the equilibrium position. An addition to the dipole may also result from a displacement of the oxygen in the direction of the titanium. The electronic and atomic polarization exerted will be proportional to the local field F, so that
L P O T C N T I A L MINIMA
x
FIG. 7. Theoretical model for barium titanate, showing positions of oxygens and potential minima for the titanium nucleus.
about 350. hence 1
1-87
or
where y is the polarizability per unit volume due to all polarization except that of the titanium dipoles. The polarizability y can be determined from the dielectric constant co measured a t verv low or very high temperatures, for since (zo
- ) 1/4u = P B / E = y FIE
(9)
and for Pd suppressed, F = E / ( l -By), hence
B
- l+-(to-
1) = 1+0(27.8).
4r
(11)
This internal field caused by the applied field E , causes a decrease in the potential at the minima 1 and an increase in the potential a t 2 equal, respectively, to
u*=+(--),. Ez +PPz 1-Br
The potentials for the other four wells are unchanged by this field and hence,
us= u4= us= us=0.
(131
By Boltzmann’s principle (Eq. (S)), the relative number of nuclei in the six potential wells, all expressed relative to N s are The dielectric constant c near absolute zero is
R4 0 z
035
b 01 3
Na= N , = Ng= Ns.
02
Y
0001
aoi
01 10 10 loo ~RLWLNCY IN MLCACYCLLS rcn SLCONO
0
ioao
FIG.6. Dielectric constant of an axis as a function of frequency.
s
Then, since the total number of nuclei is equal to N where N is the number per cubic centimeter, we have
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric Efect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, 6. T.Matthias
1626
\V. F. M A S O K A N D B . T. h I . A T T H I . 4 S I
!
/k
DIST.INCE
3 5
2 4
6
\’
. I
DISTANCE
2 3
POTENTIAL WELL NUMBERS
P,
_=_
WELL NUMBERS
from the center of the cell.
Substituting in the values from Eqs. (14) we have
N
The polarization of a dipole nature excited along the Z axis will be then
P,= (NI - N ? ) p /( 1 -07) - NIJsinh[(E= +@PJ 2 +coshC(E.+PPJ/(1 -07)
I d k I’ Icrlk T
‘
(19)
Examining this equation, we see that PJNp will have a solution different from zero only if A is equal to 3 or greater. I f A is greater than 3, P J N k can have a positive or negative value lying between zero and 1. This represents a spontaneous polarization along the positive or negative 2 axis due to the internal field generated by charge displacements of the titanium nuclei from the central position. In general any one of the oxygen atoms can be considered as lying along the 2 axis and only chance determines in which direction the spontaneous polarization occurs. I f we solve for PJNp as a function of A , the relation shown by Fig. 9 results. This is a very much larger increase of P,/Np with increase in A than occurs for a single bond of the hydrogen bond type which is determined by an equation of the type PJNp = tanh(AP,/Np). (20) The relative increase for this type is shown by the dashed line of Fig. 9 for the same percentage increase in A. Some confirmation for this sudden increase in polarization is obtained from the cell dimensions shown by Fig. 2. T h e changes in cell dimension, which are independent of the direction of polarization along the 2 axis, can be regarded as due to the electrostrictive effect in barium titanate. The electrostrictive effect for the barium titanate ceramic has been investigated in a previous papers and i t is there shown
(17)
All the equilibrium values of spontaneous polarization, coercive fields, dielectric constants, etc. can be determined from this equation. Let us first consider the condition for spontaneous polarization and the ferroelectric effect. This can be obtained by setting E , equal to zero and determining the conditions for which the polarization P, is different from zero. Setting E , equal to zero and introducing the substitution
A =C0N1~’/(1-0r)ll/kT.
sinh(AP,,‘Np)
NIJ 2+cosh(AP,/Np)’
3.4,5,6 3.4.1.6 1.2.5.6 I .2.5.6 ? .2.3.4
FIG.8. I’otential distribution as D function of distance
-
31
Equation (17) becomes
POTEIlTIAI
POTENTIAL
I
(18)
FIG.9. Theoretical curve for ratio of spontaneous polarization P . to the total polarization Nu a s a function of the factor A . 8 W : P . , F s o n , “Electrostrictiveeffect in hariuni titanate ceramics, Phys. Rev. (to be published).
I
32 2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
FERROELECTRIC EFFECT IN BARIUM
that the ceramic has an increase in thickness and a decrease in radial dimension given by the strain equations
S33=Qll(Ps)*;
+Q12(Ps)'
40
50
(21)
S11=S22=
where
20
(cm2/stat coulomb)2; (cm2/stat coulomb)2.
Qll =6.9 X QI2= -2.15 X
I0
While the value of Q11/Q12 is not exactly equal to -2 for the ceramic, a guide to the spontaneous polarization is obtained from these values. At 2OoC, S33 the longitudinal thickness strain is equal to 6.7 X lomawhile the radial thickness strain is equal to S11= 4 2 = -3.3 X lo-* from the measurements of Fig. 2. With these values and the electrostrictive constants of Eq. (21), the indicated spontaneous polarization for the two effects is
P,= 31,500
1627
TITANATE
stat coulomb cmz coulomb
= 10.5 x lo+--
(low),
cm2
(22)
stat coulomb
P, = 39,000
Oo TLYPERATURL IN
00
FIG.10. Measured
DLCRELI C
spontaneous polarization as a function of the temperature.
temperature is evident, and this agrees qualitatively with that shown b y Fig. 9. T o find if the spontaneously generated polarization agrees quantitatively with that calculated from Eq. (19) we have to evaluate A and p by other methods. One method for doing this is to measure the dielectric constants at low field strengths as a function of temperature. The calculated value can be obtained from Eq. (17) by dividing the polarization P. into the spontaneous part PS and a very small alternating part P@iuL. T h e applied field EpivL is assumed very small and hence we have
cm2
=12.9XlO-'-
coulomb cm2
(E,+OPo)eiwf+OPs (radial).
stat coulomb P, = 3 5 , 2 5 0 ~ cm2
160, 126 (1947).
1 -Pr
coulomb *
cm2
(23)
-
(BPS )
(Ez+OP~)ec'];T -sinh
+cosh[
This value agrees quite well with that measured electrically by means of the hysteresis loops. For this value Matthias and von Hippel' find a value 12 X 10-6 coulombjcm2 while Hulme finds a value 16 X lo-' coulomb/cm2. This calibration allows one to obtain the spontaneous polarization as a function of temperature, and this is shown plotted by Fig. 10. The very sudden rise in spontaneous polarization just below the Curie
SF.H u h , Nature
P
= sin h
Taking the average of these
= 1 1.7 X lo-'-
,3-
sinh
(E.+/3Po)eiwfp (1 - P r W
1-07
APs cosh-+sinh-.
P
-
APs
kT
(24)
NP
NP
Similarly, cosh[
(E,+pPo)ciwf+8PS] ;T
A Ps
-=cash-
1-81!
+[(E.fBPo)ejwt] -sinh-. 1-&
NP
P
APs
kT
Nfi
(25)
Inserting Eqs. (24) and (25) in (17) and solving for the constant and time variable parts, we ob-
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the FerroeleGtric Efect in Barium Jitanate
- W.
I
P. Mason, 6. T. Matthias
33
1628
W . P . MASON A N D B . T . M A T T H I A S
tain Eq. (19) for the constant part, and for the time variable part we have
Poeju0' (E.+pPo)ejYt Np2
(1-Br)kT
cubic and all directions equivalent, i t is thought that the best values for C a n d TOwill be obtained from a dense ceramic piece. From the dielectric constant above 12OOC of Fig. 3, we obtain the values
2 cosh(APs/Np)+l
C= 40,000; 2'0 = 393°K
C2 + ~ o ~ h ( A P s l ~ d ] *
Solving for Po,multiplying by 4r and adding the dielectric constant for electrons and atoms, the dielectric constant for the x axis becomes
(30)
and from low temperature measurements Q
= 350.
(31)
Taking the ratio of C / T , of Eq. (29) we find j3= (4rTo/C)=0.124
(32)
upon inserting the experimental values. Then, since the number of dipoles per cubic centimeter (as determined from the size of the unit cell) is N = 1.56X lon ; k = 1.38X lo-", we have
C= 40,000 = or
Above the Curie point, the spontaneous polarization PSdisappears and this equation reduces to (4rA c*= co+-=co+-
/a)
3-A
c T-To
(28)
upon introducing the value of A from Eqs. (18) and ( t l ) ,where
4x(1.56X 1022)pz[1+0.124(350/4r)] 3X1.38X10-*6 p=4.34X lo-".
(33)
This value of p agrees fairly well with the value one would obtain from the recent x-ray observations that the titanium atom is displaced b y 0.16A from the center of the unit cell. If the oxygen atom moves an equal distance to meet it (which could not be determined by x-ray observations), the dipole moment would be (4e+ 2e) (0.16 X lo-*) = 6X4.8 X 10-lo X 0.16 X loF8=4.6 X
(34)
If all the dipoles pointed in one direction, the total polarization would be N p = 1.56X10MX4.34X10-18=67,500e.s.u. = 22.5 X coulomb cm2. (35)
The single domain crystals have so many impurities in them to prevent the breaking up of the crystal into multi-domains that they do not revert to a cubic crystal above the Curie point. This is shown by the different dielectric constant for the two directions above the Curie point. The same is true to a lesser extent for the multidomain crystals, but the ceramic pieces show a pronounced maximum and a Curie region above 120°C, much in agreement with Eq. (28). Since above the Curie temperature the crystal becomes
The measured value of approximately 35,500 e.s.u. is 53 percent of this. If all the quantities entering Eq. (18) for A were independent of temperature except T,the absolute temperature, the value of A for 27°C = 300 K would be 3.94. and from Fig. 9 the theoretical value of the polarization P8/Np should be 0.90, rather than the measured value of 0.53, which corresponds to a value of A = 3.090. This result indicates t h a t some of the quantities in the expression for A decrease as the temperature is lowered. A similar result is also required for the variation of dielec-
34
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1961
FERROELECTRIC EFFECT IN BARIUM TITANATE
1629
0.1 4 tric constant with temperature. A value of a. A=3.090, Ps/Np=0.53, and j3 set at 0.096 (in g" 0.12 order to give a value of A = 3.090), and all the P 2 010 other quantities unchanged, results in a dielectric 7. constant of 1390 which agrees well with the 3 000 dielectric constant for a ceramic or for a multiL 0 u 0.08 domain barium titanate crystal. The variation 3 5 0 04 may be ascribed t o 8 or to co because the measured 200 300 TLYCCRATYRC IN DZCRLLS LOSOLUTE temperature expansion coefficients indicate that N a n d p should be relatively constant. From the FIG.1 1 . Value of Lorentz factors @I and @ I for z = c and y = a axes as a function of temperature. x-ray data of Fig. 2 it is seen that from 12OOC to OOC, N should increase by 0.15 percent. Since the titanium atom is tightly bound to the oxygen, the much larger than that along the c axis. To dedistance between the center of oxygen and termine the dielectric along the a axis, according titanium should not change appreciably because to the model shown by Fig. 7, with a field applied of temperature contraction, and hence p also will along the Y axis, and a spontaneous polarization not change much with temperature. The value of occurring along 2,the potentials for all six wells co, however, may be different for the a and G axes are since the a axis decreases while the c axis in81Psr u2=-. creases. Hence, cc may be smaller and ea larger u l = 1 -81v 1-417 than co. The Lorentz factor 8, also, may vary considerably depending on the condition of the C&+82P,lr &+82P, (36) surrounding electrical charge configurations. For U3= ; u4=(--).; (1 -827) 1 -827 isotropic conditions, the theoretical value is 4a/3=4.19. For the case of the titanium surUS= US=o. rounded closely by the oxygens the experimental value is only 0.124. As the temperature is de- We assume that B2 along the Y axis may be creased, all the oxygen atoms come closer to- different from 81,along the 2 axis. Applying the N ) and gether and hence a decrease in a is to be expected. Boltzmann principle and relating N1, N2, Assuming all the variation due to 8 , the values to N, to N6= N8 we find agree with the dielectric constant measurements are shown plotted by Fig. 11. With these values of 8 (assuming all the other quantities in A are independent of the temperature), A can be evaluated as a function of temperature and the theoretical values of spontaneous polarization can be determined from Eq. (19). These are shown plotted by the dashed line of Fig. 10, and these agree closely with those determined from the electrostrictive effect. Hence, two independent sets of data are satisfied by the 8-curve. Y
-(!YE);
III. DIELECTRIC CONSTANT ALONG a AXIS
Measurements for the dielectric constants along the a axis for single domain crystals show that the dielectric constant along this axis is very
Since
+
NI Nz +Ns+ Nd+ Ng+ Na= N we find for Ns, the value
(38)
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric Efect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, B. T. Matthias
1630
W. P . MASON A N D 9 . T . MAT'THIAS
Inserting the value of Na, Nd, and
P, = (Na- N 4 ) p = -~
I
35
Ns in the expression for the polarization along the Y axis, we have NPsinhC(E, +B2Pu)/( 1 -B n ) IrlkT
_
C 1+cash C (Pips)/ ( 1 - BIT)I P /T+coshC ~ (G+PzPA/(1-
_ 827)
_'
I P T/I~
~ (40)
To determine the dielectric constant along Y for small fields, we can replace
+
Eu BZP"
Eu +PZPU (41)
'Then
where A=
(G); NP'PI [ ,
= NP'PI 1 +
B I ( ~ )
1.
(43)
Solving for the ratio of Puto E,, multiplying by 4 r , and adding 6 the dielectric constant due to other sources than the dipole moment, the dielectric constant along y becomes
Now, since the crystal becomes tetragonal due to the distortion caused by the electrostrictive effect, y may increase along the a axis and cause t o to become larger. As before, however, we assume all variation to occur in 82 and write 1 -= 1-027
+--. 41r- 1) /%(to
1
(45)
Inserting this value in Eq. (44)for the dielectric constant
At the Curie temperature where the crystal changes from tetragonal form to cubic form the value of 82 must be equal to 81 and hence the dielectric constant along the Y axis will have a Curie temperature at the same temperature as the one along the 2 axis. For other temperatures, 02 will not, in general, equal 81 on account of the shift in charge due t o the electrostrictive effect. One might expect, however, that the shift in charge might to a first approximation produce
additive effects and that, in general 2P2+PI
= 3B,
(47)
where is the Lorentz factor for the cubic crystal. The factor of 2 is used for 02 since the charge along the X and Y axis is only half that along the 2 axis. According to Eq. (46) the very high dielectric constants along Y shown on Fig. 5 have t o be accounted for by the near vanishing of the de-
36
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1 911
FERROELECTRIC EFFECT IN BARIUM
1631
TITANATE
nominator of Eq. (46). The values of fit to make Hence, the rate of change of the polarization the denominator vanish, with the experimentally along the Z axis is determined values of f i 1 are shown by the dashed d(N1- N ~ P line of Fig. 11. These values would agree with the dP, -=-above speculation if the average value of 0 fell off dt dt with temperature according t o the dotdash line. = -N1(2a1,z+a1.a + ~ , 4 + a i . s + a 1 . d ~ Another verification of the near vanishing of the numerator is the very low value of the relaxation +N2(2at I + ~ z .3 + m . 4 + ~ .s + w . SIP frequency for the dielectric constant along the Y axis, shown by Fig. 6. As shown by the next +Nap(ar, 1 -as. 2) +N4p(ar, I - a4.z) section, this can be accounted for by the same +Nsr(aa1-as.z)+Nsr(as.1-as.z). (51) potential barrier for both Y and 2 directions, provided that the denominator of Eq. (27) for the When a field is applied along the 2 axis, the podielectric constant along the c=Z axis is about tential minimum U 1is lowered, and Uz raised by 100 times as large as that of Eq. (46) for the Y amounts shown by Eq. (12). Hence, axis. IV. RELAXATION FREQUENCIES FOR THE DIELECTRIC CONSTANTS
T o determine the high frequency behavior of the dielectric constants that is predicted b y the model of Fig. 7, one can no longer use the Boltzmann equilibrium relation of Eq. (5) t o determine the relative number of titanium nuclei in the various potential wells. Instead, one has to relate the time rate of change of the number in a given potential well t o the probability of transition for a given time from one potential well to another. a L 2 the probability of a nucleus in well 1 jumping to well 2 per unit time is, according to Eyring's reaction rate theory, a1,
= (kT/h)e-Au/kT
(48)
where h is Planck's constant, k Boltzmann's constant, and AU the difference between the maximum height of the potential barrier and the potential of well 1. The time rate of change of the number N 1 of nuclei in wells of type 1 is obviously dNi -=
dt
- N I ( ~z I+ w, ,
3+ai. 4 + ~ . s + w .
a)
+ N z ~ 1zf N s a a , ifN4a4, I +N6as 1 + N w
I.
(49)
Similarly, dNa _=_
dl
N d a , I +m,3 +ax
4+az,
S+W.
+Nisi, r+Nia,. z+Niac.
6)
2
+N6ah2+Neaa2.
(50)
(E. 1- B n
By the discussion of Section 11, it appears that the highest potential barrier in going from 1 to the 3,. 4, 5 or 6 potential wells is also nearly AU. Hence, ffl, Z = f f l . 3 = a I . 4 =
(53)
ffl.6 = f f l . ( I .
Also, az,1 =at,a =az. 4 = az. 6 =
(54)
az, 6.
In going from potential wells 3, 4, 5 or 6 to any of the other wells, the highest potential barrier is A U , since these minima are not changed by a field along Z and hence
kT aa, n=a4,,=as,,=as..=-e-Au'kT
t
(55)
11
where n has all values from 1 to 6 except the one which makes the second index equal to the first. Therefore, introducing thesevalues in Eq. ( S l ) , the time rate of change of polarization along the Z axis becomes, for a simple harmonic field,
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric Efect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, 6. T. Matthias
1632
W . P.
M A S O N A N D B. T . M A T T H I A S
If w is zero, this reduces to the Boltzrnann condition for determining the ratio of N2/N1. Since we are dealing only with infinitesimal fields, the sum of Nt and NI can be taken equal to their equilibrium values given by Eq. (16). Since Eq. (56) can be written in the form
I
37
this becomes
6k T coshC(E8+BiPJ/(1 - P l y )
I d kT
NI.~ sinh C(E.+BIP,) / ( 1 -P n 1I d k T
=[
--P.]
2 +coshC(&+BiPA/(1
-Pir)]rlkT
(58) Introducing the relations of Eqs. (24) and (25) and solving for the time variable parts of the polarization, P O ,noting that
E
+BJ's
- ( N -N*) ~ c & ( ~ ) Y ] ,
~-PIY
(57)
kT
we find for the dielectric constant as a function of frequency, the equation
4rA 2 cosh(APs/Np) +1 e, = co
x(
2+cosh(APs/Np)
_
+--
2 cosh(APs/Np)+l 2 +cosh(A P a / N p )
______ .
2+cosh(APs/Np)
)+( cosh(APs/NF)
-eAU
(59)
Ik f
When the last term in the denominator equals the sum of the other two, the dipole dielectric constant has equal resistance and reactance values and the corresponding frequency is the relaxation frequency. 'This frequency fa is given by 6kTe-AUlkT fa =
2 ~ h
[
c o s h z ( 1-
+
A (2 cash (A PslN1.1) 1 ) (60)
( 2 +cosh(APslNd)'
For 27°C =300"K, we found A =3.090; Ps/Np=0.53. Introducing these values and the values
k=1.38X10-16; T = 3 0 0 ; h=6.56, lo-?', we find for fa, the value
f ~ 1.6 = X 101ze-Au~kT. From the data of Eqs. (2) and (3), the relaxation frequency of a ceramic (which probably coincides with that for the c axis direction) is 6.2XlO' cycles. From this one obtains a value for the potential maximum' of eAUlkT = 260 ; A U = 3.35 kilocalories per mole. This value represents the amount of energy to remove the titanium nucleus from its equilibrium position to a position in the center of the barium titanate unit cell. The data of Fig. 6 show that the dielectric constant along the a axis is relaxed at a frequency of about 15 megacycles at room temperature. Applying the same process to calculating the dielectric constant along the a axis, one finds
1
S"=CO+
2 +cash- --
_______ .
(64)
38
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
FERKOELECTKIC EFFECT IN
BARIUM
TITANATE
1633
To obtain a dielectric constant of 150,000 at 27°C = 300'K, the real part of the denominator has to be 0.0028. Hence, the indicated relaxation frequency for this temperature is 2 +COS~-
6kT
A P s ABz 1+(1%/4*)(60-1) --
Nfi
j0=--&UlkT-
(
81 1+(81/4*)(eo-l) [2 +cash (APslNp)]
A Ps
)I coshx
Introducing the numerical values, = 645 or
A Li= 3.0 kilocalories.
l h u s the indicated activation energy for going from the 1, 2 wells to the 3, 4, 5 or 6 wells is only slightly higher than that between opposite wells such as 1 and 2. This calculation also checks the facts that it is the near vanishing of the denominator of Eq. (64)that causes the very high dielectric constant along the a or X = Y axes. V. COERCIVE FIELDS ALONG a AND c AXES
'The coercive fields along the a and c crystallographic axes and the interaction between a field along c and a polarization generated along a can be calculated from Eqs. (36) and (40), giving the polarizations along the c =Z direction and the a = Y direction. In terms of complete fields and polarizations along the two directions these equations become
p
=-
Nfi sinhC(E,+BJ'A/ (1 -an) I d k T
' 1 +cosh[(Ea+BZA/(1 -Blr)]a/kT+~o~hC(Eu+B*P")/(1 -82~)IfilkT'
From these two equations and the constants evaluated previously, the coercive fields for the two directions can be approximately calculated.
FIG.12. Method for obtaining spontaneous polarization and co-
ercive field.
B
w
3 I
(66)
The calculations show that i t takes considerably more of a negative field along 2 to reverse the sign of a domain along Z t h a n it does to change
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric EfJkct in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, B. T. Matthias
1634
W.
P. MASON A N D B. T . M A T T H I A S
I
39
will cause the polarization to increase from 35,600 stat coulombs/cm* to 41,500 stat coulombs, an increase of 16 percent. This agrees quite well with the increase measured by HulmO who found an increase of about 13 percent for this case. If we put on a negative voltage along the axis the ratio P J N p will decrease steadily until the difference between the left hand side of Eq. (69) and PJNp reaches a maximum. This occurs for P,/Np=0.405, and it requires a negative field of
E,= 74 e.s.u./cm
= 22,200 volts/cm.
(70)
This is the theoretical field strength to switch the direction of a domain along one direction of 2 to FIG.13. Hysteresis loop showing relation between polarization along Z and field along Z for a single domain barium that along the other. Single domain crystals have titanate crystal. been observed to switch at around this value of field strength. the direction from Z to Y. To show this, let us A true single domain crystal, however, will assume that no field or polarization exist along Y. have a hysteresis loop for a considerably smaller Then Eq. (66) can be written in the form field strength than this. For such a crystal a typical field strength polarization curve is as P. sinhC(AEz/BNd +(APz/Np)l -= * (68) shown by Fig. 13. When the voltage is in the direction of the spontaneous polarization, the N P 2 +cash C (AEIBNp) ( Ap1/Nrc)1 curve has a tail toward the right hand side that is Now, since AEz/BNp is going to be a very small considerably different from the rounded relation quantity for any field that can be applied, this on the left hand side. This dissymmetrical type of can be written as curve occurs down to field strengths of the order of 1000 volts per centimeter and appears to result sinh ( AP./Np) from the fact that on the application of a nega2' +cosh(AP./Np) tive field along Z,parts of the domain can be spontaneously polarized along Y.To see that this PI A E, 2 cosh(AP,/Np) 1 =__is possible one can examine the conditions for Np BNp (2+cosh(AP./Np))' spontaneous polarization along Y given by Eq. (67). Here we set E, equal t o zero and solve for I f the applied field E. is zero, this equation re- the conditions that will give a finite value of P, in duces to that for the spontaneous polarization. the presence of a field E., and a spontaneous If we plot the left hand side of Eq. (69) as a polarization P,. 'The onset of P, will be defunction of PJNp (assuming A =3.090 for room termined when P, approaches zero, and thus we temperature) the curve of Fig. 12 results. The can replace the hyperbolic sinh by the argument, left hand side is larger than the right, up to a value of P,/Np=0.534 when the two are equal, and the hyperbolic cosh by unity. Then the and this reoresents the theoretical value of equations to solve are spontaneous polarization for no applied field. I f p, (ro2)1/(1 - h Y ) ( P l k T P , -=--the applied field is positive, a larger ratio of (71) Np ~ + C O ~ ~ C ( E , + P I P , ) / ( ~ - P ~ ~ ) ] ~ / ~ T ' P , / N p is required to satisfy Eq. (69). Since a t room temperature, A =3.090; Np=67,100 e.s.u.; this reduces to the B = 0.096 ; cosh(AP./Np) = 2.68, the coefficient If multiplying E , is 1.24X10-'. I t takes, then, a Apz) 1 + [ B z ( ~ o - 1)/4r] very high field to increase sensibly P./Np. For p, 2+cosh=NP 81 1+[S1(60-1)/4r] example. a field of 30,000 volts per cm = 100 e.s.u.,
+
[
+
Ez=oi
(
I
40 2 Selected Early Work 7927-7967 FERROELECTRIC EFFECT IN BARIUM TITANATE
163s
The difference between the left hand side and the right hand side is the denominator of Eq. (44)for the dielectric constant along the Y axis. This denominator is small (about 0.0028 for room temperature) but is always positive, hence no spontaneous polarization can exist along Y as long ae there is no static field -E,. For the addition of a static field, Eq. (71) takes the form
A positive field E. in the same direction as P . makes the left hand side still larger than the right, and no possibility exists for polarization along Y. If, however, a negative field E. is applied, the left hand side can be made equal or less than the right hand side, and spontaneous polarization can exist along Y. Since AE./BINp is a small quantity, this equation can be written in the form
Since for room temperature the numerator is equal to 0.0028, the denominator to 2.53, the field E. to cause a domain to switch to the Y direction is 0.0028 0.108 X 67,100 E,=X ~ 2 . e.s.u./cm=780 6 volts/cm, 2.53 3.090
(74)
which is considerably less than the voltage required to shift a domain along 2. The question arises as to why the whole domain does not go over in the Y direction. This appears to be owing to the fact that when parts of the large domains change direction, they exert an Ey field on the remainder of the domain that is still directed along 2.Then the term cosh[(E,+B#,)/(l -&y)] x ( p / k T ) can no longer be replaced by unity, and the equation for the field to produce a spontaneous polarization along Y becomes
AE.
-= BlNP
tl
sinh (AP./Np)
and the field E, becomes larger. There is no definite saturation for the effect which accounts for the rounded shape of the left side of the hysteresis loop of Fig. 13. When a positive E. voltage is applied, all the Y domains revert back to the 2 direction, which accounts for the taillike shape of the right hand side of the curve of Fig. 13. When a field is applied along Y, the relation between P,, and E, is very linear and shows no hysteresis effects up to a field strength of 300 volts per centimeter, at which field the crystal usually breaks down because of the high conduc-
(75)
tivity along the a axis. Up to that voltage, no domain shift in the Y direction has occurred. T o obtain the field for the shift requires that both Eqs. (66) and (67) shall be solved simultaneously for the P, and P . polarizations and this is not attempted here. VI. SPBCIFIC HEAT ANOMALY OF BARIUM TITANATE
The specific heat anomaly of barium titanate ceramics for the 120°C transition has been measured by Harwood, Popper and Rushman,lo and Nature 160,58 (1948).
2.4 Theoretical Modelfor Explaining the Ferroelectric Efect in Barium Titanate - W. P. Mason, 6. T. Matthias
1636
W. P. MASON A N D B. T. MATTHIAS
Blattner and Merz." The former obtain a value of 0.14 cal./gram whereas the latter obtain 0.2 cal./gram. I t has been shown by Mueller'* that the specific heat anomaly is related to the spontaneous polarization by the equation
Q =S/2P.2
(76)
where Q is the specific heat anomaly in ergs/cc, i3 is the Lorentz factor and P. the spontaneous "Helv. Phvs. Acta. Vol. XXI. Fasciculus Tertius el Quartus (1948). "Annals New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. XL (Art. 5), page 353.
I
41
polarization. Since the specific heat anomaly was the integrated increase from about 100°C to a temperature above the Curie temperature we have from Fig. 10, that P,=27,OOO c.g.s. units of charge per square cm. Q, the specific heat anomaly, is 0.2 cal./gram= 1.2 cal./cc=S x 107 ergs/cc. This gives a value of 0 determined by the specific heat anomaly of
0 = 0.138
(77) which agrees reasonably well with the value given in Eq. (32), obtained from dielectric measurements.
42
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-19Gl
SCVI. T l ~ o r gof Barium Titanate.-Part
I.
By A. F. DEVOKSHIRE, H. H. Wills Physical Laboratory, University of Bristol *. [Reaeivod July 26, l949.1
SUMMARY. Tine theory of the dielectric and crystallographic properties of barium titanate is considered. By espanding the free energy as a function of polarization and strain and making reasonable assumptioils about the coefficients, it is found possiblo to ncwunt for the various crystal transitiong. Calculations are made of the dielectric constants, crystttl at,rtins, internaJ energy, and self polarization RS functions of teinperaturo. Finally relation8 are obtained between the coefficients in the free energy and the ionic force con&nts. These two wed to estimate ~0111eof the coeficients which are not complotely deteriuinad by cxperinientd data. $1.
INTRODUCTION.
Iw the Inst few yeare t h e l~ropci'tiesof a iiuinber of substances I-xiioww as ferroelect,ricsor seigiiette-electricshave been initch studied. At present three groups of them ml)strzIices are known, t y j & ~ members l of the tllree gronps being Roclielle mlt,, potamiuni tliliydroge~~ pliosp2iate, and Liwium titnilate. All t hest! snbsttuiccs I ~ R V C crrtr~iiiproperties in coiiiiiicrii. At sufficiently high temj~cratiirestheir lircq)(~tiesare norninl, tliotrgli tile tlielectxic const..~.~lt~s are 11~11aily ~ . n t J liigli. l~ -4s the t ~ ~ n l ~ ~falls i ~ t 1 1 ~ the; dielectrio coiistniit incrc.:ms ;~nclmarlies t~ 1)CaIi ttt i t transition tempertbI,iu'e. At tliiri t~ciiiperatmc~ t liere i R EL c11~iige oS crystal Sorni to one of lower xymiiictry. Below t l h teniperatwe each crgstn I Ixenks up iiit o doninins nntl there is Clem evidence tlmat3 these c h i n i n s we polarized. The substance shows the lwopevt ias of hystere& aacl sntjnration thwt one woulrl espcct froni snoli n s t m o t iirr. There may he lower
* Cnnimaniaated 1,y tlir Xutllor.
-
2 5 Theory ofBanurn Titanate - A F. Devonshlre
Theory of Barium Titanate.
1041
transition temperatures. Rochelle salt bccomes norinal again at still lower temperatures, and barium titanate has two lower transition tenipratures at which there are further changes of crystal form. The crystal changes are always small, the shears involved being usually less than a degree. There are also small specific heat changes at the trailsition temperature. In this paper we shall consider only the most recently discovered poup of ferroelectrics, the third, and in particular barium titanate. This is the only known pure subHtancc in the group, though solid solutions of barium titanate with l a d or strontium titanate show similax properties. \f'e shall first review t,lieexperimental evidencc on tho crystal structure, specific heat, saturation polarization and dielectric constant for small fields. We shall then discuss the tlieory of the substance, first on a phenonienological basis and then in terms of a molecular model. This will include a discussion of theories already put forward. We shall not consider the dielectric constant at large fields, nor any of the timedependent phenomena, such as hysteresis or the dependence of dielectric constant on frequency of field. We hope to deal with some of these in a later paper. $2. CRYSTALSTRUCTURE
Atwve the transition temperature barium titanate BaTiO,, has a cubic structure. The barium ions lie at the corners of a cubic lattice, the titanium ions at the body centres, and the oxygen ions at the face centres. Below 120" ('. it W ~ shown S by Megaw (1946) that the substance becomes tctragonttl ; one of the axes (usually taken to be the c-axis) becomes lengthened, and the other two shortened. The axial lengths as a funotion of temperature are shown in fig. 1. It will be seen that the change appears to set in rather abruptly. This was verified by Harwood, Popper and Rushman (1947), who showed that in a given crystallite c/o changed discontinuously from 1 to 1.005. There is a range of a few degrees, however, in which the substance is a mixture of cubic and tetragonal forms. Optical studies by Kay (1948) Matthinu and Yon Hippel (1948) and Bliittncr, Kanzig and Merz (1 949) show that each crystal has broken up into a number of domains. In the simplest ty-pc the domains aro arranged in the way shown in fig. 2. The domain extends from one face to 21 parallel one and the directions of the tetragond axe3 Lire as shown. Yore recent optical and X-ray studies by Kay, Vousden and \Vellard (1949) show that there is a. further t,runsition at about - 1 0 ' (;. Below this temperattire the crystal is orthorhombic. At the trmsition the c-par'tiiietcr shortens slightly and the a-parameter increases so t h t h t the two become cqual and there is :L shear of about 14' in the M plane. The polar axis, which was formerly in the c-direction is now along a diagonal in the ca plane. The above authors also report that there is a further transition at about, -70°C. Below this temperature the crystal i R probably rhombohedra1 with the polar axis along the [ I 1 11 direction.
I
43
I
44 2 Selected Early Work 1921-19Gl
1042
Dr.A. F.Devonshire on the Fig. 1.
Lattice spacing of BaTiO, as a function of temperature (Mepaw 1946). Fig. 2.
2.5 Theory ofBariurn Titanate - A . F. Devonshire
I
45
I t has been found by Wul (1946) and also by Harwood, Popper and 1<usiunsn (1947) that there ia a huiup in the specifio heat C I ~ Win the miglibourhood of 120' C. Blattaer, Kanzig and Merz (1049) found A Iiuiup in the neighbourliood both of 120" C. and of 0' U. The additional specific lie&, is only a siiiall fraction of the normal specific heat so it is difficult to separate the two, but Blsttner, etc. found thst the t o t d additional heat ww about447 cals.jiiiole at the higher transition, and about 1(i calls./iiiale at the lower trrtmitioii. Tlie other authors' resulte ctre iivt sttttect in their papers, but estimting very roughly from their ctirl-es the total dditional heat ap1mm to be about 20 or 30 crtls./niole. Thero is only a linlitecl amount of eviclence on the spontaneous polerizatioii. A field whioh is strong euough to orientate d l the domaiiw in the s ~ n i edirection will protliice con.ritlernlrle induod polarization since the cloinaiiis are tlieniselves highly lmlttrjzthle. I t ir, difficult, therefore, to xepar,ztr the spontoneousfrom the indticecl polarization. For sufiiciently strong fieltls, liowever, the polariz$tioii becomes n Iiiietw function of fielcl strength, nnd h,v est,rirpolatiiig back to zero field Hidin (19.15) estimated that, the spontaneuus 1mlnrizntio1i nt rooin teuiper&m wtw rsbout 16 microcoulombs per mi.$. Mattliiw and Von Hippel (1!!48) wtiinated it t o be about 12 iiiicrocoulombslcm.'. Unfor%unt&tuly we do not know the spontsueous polarization &FJ s function of tenipar&ure, but Hulm (1947) lius given the t o t d polarization for largo Eel& as ttfiinction of temperature. h tilo temperature falls it rises rather ra,pidly in the neigblioiwliood of 120' C. and then incrtrasos slowly. The mcasuremttnta (la not, go below Oo ('. $4. ~)IELECTI~IC* CONSTANTFOR SMALL FIELDS. Numorons measurements of tlie dielectric conshiit for small fidh have born iniKIcJ, usunlly witli alternating ourmiit. Papm ky varioris Russian authors litive been aliiimarizert by Wul (l!)M). Jackson and &xldisli (l!J45)and Kiislininn and Strivens (1!+4O) hsve stu&ecl the effect of varying the ctmpositioii. Von Hippel, Rrockanriclge, Clherjley and Tkza (1946) l m ~ ~pibli~hetl r many nimsuremantij for varioiw compositions, fielcl strengths, nnd frequencies. All the aiitlhors8grm that! above the liigliest. trtmsition t.einpcrntnr@the dielectric cowt$nnto b e p n Cnrie-Weim lnw : that is A e= -
T-T,,+%
wliert+cu uiay ur limy not, be zero and A i8 very large, about 105 clegrsw. Below this teinperttture the dielectric con&mt drops to about 1000-WNt, and as the tein1)erst:ire deci.ea8es renmim constant or dowlg clecrwes. There are arii~ll1maIis at, lower temperatures. These almost. certainly correspond to the lower crystal tramitionr;. All the above iueavurements were instie with pc)wders. Now, above the highest transition temnptmture the siibstance h a g complete cubic ywiimetry and therefore A single dielectric coilstrtnt :
46
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
1044
Dr. A. I?. Devonshire on the
but below this temperature the dielectric constants along the different axes will be different and experiments on powders will only give a mean value. Matthias and Von Hippel (1 948) have carried out experiments on single crystals ; but even a single crystal may contain several differently orientated domains. However, they made measurements on a crystal in which all the domains had been made parallel by applying a strong electric field, and they found a dielectric constant of 500 along the c-axis and 1700 along the a-axis. Mason and Matthim made measurements on eingle domain crystals and found dielectric constants along the a-axis Fig. 3.
T "C
Dielectria constant of RaTiO, single domain crystals (Merz 1949).
of the order of los. Merz, however, found more moderate values. His results are shown in fig. 3. The discontinuities at the lower tranaition temperatures are very well marked. $5.
THEORIES.
Suggestions put forward to account for the behaviour of barium titanate are usually based on the assumption that the titanium ion can move rather easily. Miss Megaw (1946) has pointed out that if the ions are all assumed to have the Goldschmidt radii they cannot be fitted together exactly t o make a cubic structure but that they have a certain amount of free space. Rushman and Strivens (1946) have developed this idea by suggesting that the titanium ions are slightly displaced from the, symmetrical position and therefore form dipoles which can rotate. I t is known that such a set of clipoles have a Curie temperature above which they rotate freely, but below which they are parallel to one another. This latter &ate, of coiirse, corresponds t o the ferroelectric region.
2 5 Theory of8arium Titanat8 - A F Devonshire
I
47
Theory of Buriunz ‘I’iianak.
1045
Mason and Natthias have developed in considerable detail a rather different model. They assume that the titanium ion has six equilibrium positions slight’ly displaced in the axial directions from the symnietrical one. In the cubic state tho ions occupy the positions at random. In the tetragonal state they occupy mainly positions along on0 axis. The transition from cubic to tetragonal symmetry therefore corresponds to a transit ion from a disordered to an ordered state. By assuming suitable values for the ionic shift, the polarizability of the rest of the material, and the Lorcntz factors, they have accounted for the dielectric constant in the cubic region, and the two dielectric constants in the tetragonal region. They have itlso considered hysteresis and frequency effects. The greater part of this paper considers the theory of barium titanate in a phenomenological way. We expand the free energy in terms of the strains and polarization of the crystal, use certain properties of t h e crptal to determine the coefficients, and then predict other properties. R’esults obtained in this way are of course, independent of any atomic model. This inetliocl has been applied to Rochelle salt with considerable success by Alueller ( I W O ) , but owing to the very different symmetry of barium titanate we cannot make any direct use of his results. Mason (1948) has applied this method to the electrostrictive effect in barium titanate; (:insburg (1946) has applied i t to the highest transition, but only a liniited aiiioiint of experimental evidence was available when his paper was published. \Ve lave been able to show that by assuming reasonable values for tho coefficients wc can explain t,he succcssivo transitions through the cubic, tetrsgonal, orthorhombric and rhombohedra1 forms. In determining the coefficients we use the observed transition temperatures, the value of the dielectric constant in the cubic region, and the observed striiin and saturation polarization at a single temperature in the tetragonal region. \Ve are then able to predict the various dielectric constants in the tetragonal, orthorhombic and rhombohedra1 regions. We also predict values for the strain and saturation polarization in these regions. It, is not possible to verify d l these predictions a8 many of these quantities have not yet been observed. Finally we consider an atomic model for barium t itmate. Following tlie method used by Born for ionic crystals we trext the ions mainly as point centres of force, though also taking into account their polarizttbility. After checking t lie force constants by calculating tho intertttoniic distance we makc a n rstimatc of the elastic constants. In conjunction with the results ;tIreatly obtained this enables us to calculatc tlie electrostrictive constants. \Vc then attempt to crtlculate direct ly the field in whicli eachion moves, tlieotlicrions heinginthosymmetrical positions. Thesecalculations cleilrly int1ic:tte that the stable position of tho titanium ion is the syninietricnl one. It seems just possible that the oxygen ions might have two mispimetrical equilibrium positions displaced towards the nearest Ti ions, h i t the calculntions are not acauratc cnough to make a definite predict ion. \Se lial-e, however, assumed thiit an ion moving individually has only one posit ion of equilibrium, and that the spontaneous polarization
48
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1 961
1046
Dr. A. F. Devonshire on the
is caused by the Lorentz field, in other words, it is D cooperative effect, since this field only exists when ions of one sign move together. The Lorentz field requires some consideration since it plays an important part in the theory of ferroelectrias. When a body becomes polarized an ion or dipole in the body will experience a force due to the polarization of the rest of the body. We may assume this force to be proportional to the polarization and put it equal to ,8P where ,8 is the Lorentz factor. Owing to the slow fall off with distance of the dipole force it is a " long range " one, that is dipoles in distant parts of the body have an appreciable effect. Hence for an insulated body fi is dependent on external shape and reaches its maximum value for a needle or plate polarized parallel to a long axis. But for an uninsulated body p always has this value whatever the external shape. A maximum value of /3 corresponds to a minimum polarization energy since this is -4fiP per unit volume, and hence the uninsulateci body will always collect surface charges in suoh a way w to make 6 a maximum, say fi,,,. For point dipoles in a cubic or random array /Im can be shown to be 4 q 3 (Fowler 1936). If the array is regular but not cubio flm will vary somewhat with direotion though its mean value will still bc 4$3. If the dipoles are not point dipoles &, will have a different value. Mason and Matthias have found it necesssry to assume that /3m is slightly different for the tetragonal and the other directions and also varies slowly with the temperature. These assumptions are reasonable, but the values they have found it necessary to assume for Is, are near 0.10. This differs considerably from the theoretical value of 4.19 even taking into account the fact that the dipoles are far'fmm being point dipoles. Physically it mean8 that the cooperativo effect between the dipoles is rather small. We have assumed that p,,, haa the value h / 3 , and that the Lorentz field approximately balances the short range restoring force. By taking into account thermal vibrations, including anharmonic terms, we are able to show that the restoring force increases with temperature, and hence explain the existence of a transition temperature. For the properties we are dealing with in this paper there is no important difference between the predictions of the two models. The Mason Matthim model would noed a little modification to account for the lower transitions, but this could certainly be done. There am bigger differences in other phenomena, but these will be dealt with in a later paper.
5 6. PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY : IXTRODUCMON.
We shall consider the substance as a strained cubic crystal. All the changes from cubic symmetry are small, so this is quite legitimate. We shall use the notation given by Cady in his " Piezoelectricity ", as far as possible. For barium titanate, however, it is necessary to consider higher order terms in the free energy than any used by Cady, so we shall have to introduce some new notation. Now the free energy of a crystal can be expressed in several different forms. We can take as our independent variables polarization and stress,
2.5 Jheory of0ariurn Titanate - A . F. Devonshire
T h y of Barium Titanate.
1047
polarization and strain, field and stress or field and strain. We shall start by expressing the free energy as a function of polarization and stress with the stresses equated to zero. We then have
+ + +45; {p"+ p;:+p:} +t
A =+X'(PE p; P,"}
+
(PEP! pqp:+ ep;> +g'(q+P;+p:}. * * (6.1)
1
5;2
The zero of free energy is taken to be that of the unpolarized, unstressed crystal. All the terms of the second and fourth orders are included and some of the terms of the sixth order. We shall find it necessary to take into account all these terms t o account for the behaviour of the crystal. The derivatives of A with respect to P, give the field-components for the free, that is unstressed, crystal. Hence we have
E, =x'P,
+4; IP!+&&',(Pi +P,")+{'Pi. . . .
(6.2)
In the absence of a field the right-hand side of (0.2) must be zero and for stability A must be a minimum. We shall find that we can account satisfactorily for the observed facts are positive, is negative, and x' is a if wo assume that 5' and decreasing function of temperature which passes through a zero value in the neighbourhood of the upper transition temperature. Since x' is the reciprocal susceptibility for zero polrtrization we can obtain its value from experiment directly above the upper transition temperature where there is zero polarization for zero field. W e find, in fact, that it is a linear decreasing function of temperature which, if extrapolated, passed through zero a little below the transition temperature. With these assumptions A will clearly be always positive for sufliciently large x', that is, at sufficiently high temperatures. The minimum value of A will then correspond t o 7~x0 poiarizlztion. For x' small or negative, however, the minimum value of A will correspond to a finite polarization. The second order term is independent of direction. But for a given resultant polarization the fourth order torm has its minima along the axes and the sixth order term has its minima, along the diagonal directions. Hence as the temperature falls and the magnitude of the polarization incresses the direction will be likely to change from an axial to a diagonal one. For zero field, equation (6.2) and the similar equations become
P,=O, or 5'P~+E;,P,2+E;,(P~+p,2)+X'=O, P,=O, or 5'Pi+S;,Pi+E;r(P2,+P:) x'=O, P, -0, or CPf ,P,"+&,(PE+Pt) x' =O.
+
+
+
1
..
(6.3)
J
There are four sets of solutions of these equations which may correspond to minima of A, namely P, =P,= P, =0, P, =P, =0, ('pf 4; lP,' x' =0,
+
+
P,=% py=pz,5 ' ~ : + ( 4 ; , + 5 ; ~ ~ ~ , 2 + ~ ' = 0( ,c ) pz=p,=pr, 5'Pf+ (6;1 25;dP;t X'"0, (4
+
. .
(6.4)
I
49
50
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
1048
Dr. A. F.Ilevonshire OR the
with, of courw, tho corresponding solutions obtained by interchanging P,, P,, and P,. The corresponding values of A are given by A=O, A==i5'P,S+)t;,pt+lttP,2, A= t(5;1+ 5;21p: X'Pi, A=B t'P,"+i(6; 1$-2&)P,J+~x'P~. The necessary conditions for A to be a minimum are
+
am+
(a)
(6) (c)
1
1I . .
(6.5)
(d) J
x'+t;2Pw,
Bs;,+5tP:>o,
(6)
x1+25;,p:>0,
91;1+5'p:>o,
(c)
d.t;z+t'p:>o.
).(4 (
. . .
(6.6)
It ia possible for A t o have more than one minimum, and we then have to determine which is the least. If we plot the values of A given by (6.4) and (6.5) a~ a funotion of x', taking C' and f' to be constant then we find that for x' positive and large enough the least minimum of A is zero, but as x' decreases the least minimum is successively given by equations (b), (c) and (d). When the minimum given by (b) is equal t o that given by (a) we have
......
(6.7)
. . . . . . .
(6.8)
$f;'~+)&P$+&x'=O,
and from (6.4 b) we have ~'P',ft;,P;+X'=o.
Let us denote by xk the value of x' which satisfies these equations and by P, the corresponding value of P,. Then we have 5'=3x;/P& (;,=-4x;/P;.
. . . . . . . . . (6.9)
. . . . . . p..I
(6.10)
If we assume that 5' and me c o n e b t s , independent of tem$erature, and therefore always given by (6.9) and (&lo),and if we also put
P;=ZP:,
. . . . . x'=txL, . . . . . . . . t;,=-~&, . . . . . . . P:=xP;,
P;=yP:,
(6.11)
(6.12) (6.13)
then equations (6.4) and (6.5) become x=y=z=o, x=Y=O, 3z2-4z+t=0, x=O, y=z, 3z2+4(-1fa)~+l=0, z=y=z,
3z2+4(- 1+2a)z+t=0,
(c) (d)
.
.
(0.14)
2.5 Theory of6anum Jitanate - A. F Devonshtre
Theory of Barium Titanute.
and
1049,
A d , A.= X,)'y' ( 3 t 3 4 hft) ,
1
A
I
+
,
~
xo'p21 ,Iz3 +:!(-l+~)~"zzt},
. . . .
(6.15)
The equations are now in a convcnient form for calculatmion,since they are now in the form of a relation between two variables z and t with a single parameter a. The other constants of the equation enter only 8s scale factors. The variable t is related t o the temperat.ure, and the relation is probably approximately linear. Me' have seen this is the case cxprimcntally for t positive, since x' is proportional t o t . I n fig. 4 we plot z and A/x;P: as functions o f t for CL equal to 1.2. As already stated the minimum value of A is given in turn by equations (a), ( b ) , (c) and (d). The value of z will therefore change discontinuously at three transition temperatures as z is given in turn by equations (a), (b), (c) and (d). The polarization, w~hich was originally zero, will in turn point along a cube edge, a face diagonal, and (t body diagonal. The corresponding effect on the crystal symmetry will be to change it from the original cubic successively to tetragonal, orthorhombic and rhombohedral. In the Schonflies notation the symmetry of the crystal will he in turn O h , CnVand CJv. $ 7 . PIIEXOMESOLOGICAL THEORY : DIELECTRIC COSSTAXT.
tn the high temperature region where the crystal has cubic symmetry the dielectric constant is independent of direction and is given by €==
1 +47r/x',
. . . . . . . .
(7.1)
but in the temporature regions where the crystal has less symmetry the dielectric constant is no longer independent of direction and hats to be descrihetl by a tensor. It is, in prrtctice, more convenient t o work in terms of the susccptibility qrs arid the reciprocal suscept ildity xrs. For small fields and polarization they are defined by the relations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and art3 connected by the equation
. . . . . . . . (7.3). d is t'he determinant of the x ' s and S, is the minor of xrsin that q,=xrSiA,
where determinant. \Than the relation between field and polarization is no longer Linear we define x by the equation Xsr'Xrs'
W PA -,= aE 2=: ap,
ap,
aP,ar,'
*
. .
, (7.4)
I
51
52
I
2 Selected Early Work 19221-19Gl
Dr. A. F. Uevonahire on the
1050
Fig. 4.
-. .--*
'.*%,
p.'.
rhombohedraI -21.0
-240
ortborhombic 20.0
-16.0
-12.0
I--
ktra4d -8.0 -4.0
\
cubic
0.0
BaTiO, as a funotion of temperature (theoretical).
!Free energy and polariestion of
2.5 Theory of6ariurn Titanate - A . F. Devonshire
Theory of Barium Titanate.
1051
Hence from (6.1) we have
with similar expressions for we have
xuz=xZL.=
Using the equatione (6.11) to (6.13)
x*u=o,
xi@ f4az1,
x x z =XU” =
xu=
xrz etc.
~ ; , (t 122
x y z = xrr=
+I~z‘)),
xzu=o*
}
xly =xtz =0, xyz= x64w xzz= xw =xu= x;l(t -122+8az+ 15z?), xyz=
xuz=xzy =x3=.
(6)
I , (d)
x=tx:;, SER.
7,VOL. 40, NO. 3 0 9 . 4 C T . 1949.
4E
I
53
54
I
2 Selected Early Work 1321-1961
1052
l)r. A.
F. Devonshire on the
and experimentally xis a linear function of temperature. We can therefore reasonably assume that 1 is a linear function of temperature throughout, and since by definition it is 1 at the upper transition temperature, which we shall call T,, we can conveniently write
. . . . . .
t=(T-To)/(L"L'-TO),
(7.10)
where Tois a parameter to be determined. Since T, is the temperature at which t and therefore x vanishes wo can determine it by extrapolating x to zero. Unfortunately it is only slightly less than T,, and since the transition is spread over a few degrees this means that T,--To is rather uncertain. From the measurements of Harwood, Popper and Rushman (1947) we estimate that Tois 118' C. and T,--To about 10' C,,making To 128" C. Since x=txC~=x~(T-To)i(T,-T~),. . . . . (7.1 1 ) we can determine x;/(T, -To)from the observed slop of x plotted against temperature. The measurements of different obsorvers agree fairly well and we find that X ; / ( ~ , - ~ T , ) =10-4(degrt~~)-5 ~.~~ (7.12)
. . . .
and hence if we take TI-To equal to 10°, then x;=1*0x 10-3.
. . . . . . .
(7.13)
l', can be determined by making the calculated saturation polarization agree with the observed value at a given temperature. If we take P, to be 10 microcoul~mbs~cni.~, then from (6.1 I ) , (6.14) and (7.10) we can show that the saturation polarization is about 16 niicrocoulo~iib~~cm.~ at room temperature in agreement with Hulm's result (1947). CL is best determined by choosing it 80 that one of the lower transition temperatures agrees with the observed value. We find, in fact, that, if we take a to be 1.2 both transition temperatures agree fairly well with the observed values. If we substitute the above values in (6.9) ,(&lo)and (6.13) we find that 5;,=-4*4
X
&=5*3X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7.14) (7.15)
and 5'=3*7 x lo-".
. . . . . . .
(7.16)
We can now plot the principal dielectric constants as a function of temperature. The dieleotria constants in the principal directions are relatcd to the reciprocal susceptibilities by the relation €=
1 +47rx-'.
The results are shown in fig. 6. If we compare them with the results of Merz given in fig. 3 we see thaC the theoretical curves have the same form,
2 5 Theory of Barium Titanate - A F Devonshire
Thcorg of Barium Titamate.
I
1033
but there is no exact numerical agreement. In the tetragoid region anti c,. I n the orthorhotnbic region E , and cC are 110 longer principal dielthctric constants ; and the crystal is no longer a single domain. However, E, must be ri nimn of ebb and eYy, ;tIltl ca iiiiist be a mean of all three dielectric constants. Xn the rhomhoheclral cast? we should expect
our cU and crz correaponcl t,o hlerz’s
c, =E , = &(Exr
+2€,,).
However, Merz found c,, to be much larger than eC. This may be the result of domain boiindaries shifting under the application of a field. This ~vouldnot affect t,he polarization in the c-direction since, presumably all dninainn have a positive component of polarization in that direction $8
Fig. 5.
-170-c -13o-c
-9O.c
-SOT
-m*c
30%
70-c
llO%
150%
. 2
19O.c
Principal dielectric constants of BaTiO, (theoretical).
the crystal had in the tetregonal region. On the other hand, the coinp n s n t u in the a-direction would be randomly positive or negative, so a shift in boundary with fields niight alter the net polarization and heiico increase e,.
0 8. PHENOMENOLOGICAL THEORY : HICAT OF POLARIZATION. The polarization will be accompanied by a chsngc of internal energy, which will be given by the usual forniula
E = = = T ( g ) -A,
. . . . . .
.
(8.1)
P
where A is given by (G.1).
Now A depends on temperature partly through L
:F 2
55
56
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
1054
Dr.A. F.Devonshire on t?w
the polsrimtion, so we can write
and hence for zero field
(g)p (g) =
. . . . . . . .
(8.4)"
PIp
Now we have assumed all the ooeffioients to be independent of temperature except x', which is given by x'=x~(T-T,J/(T,-TJ.
. . . . .
(8.6)
Hence
40
60.44'
T inkd c"ccpy (r.l%/mob
,201
2.5 Theory ofBariurn Titanate - A. F. Devonshire
I
All the terms of order pl or lower order are given, where it has been assumed that the strain is of the order of the square of the polarization. This will shortly be verified. Terms not given vanish because of the crystal symmetry. The cornponentu of field and stress are given by the equations
If we assume that the six components of stress are zero, then we get six relations between strain and polarization, namely
1
' ~ = ~ ~ 1 ~ , + ~ 1 2 ~ ~ y + ~ 2 ~ + ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ + 8 1 ~ ~ ~ ; + ~ , 2 ~ ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 =C( 4 Y a s 844P&.
. . . . .
t
. . .
(9.3
J
If we solve these equations for the strain in terms of the polarization we find that
If wc substitute these values for the strain in equation (9.1) then we get an expression for the free energy in terms of polarization for zero stress, that is, we obtain equation (6.1) except for terms of higher order than P4. Comparing the coefficients of P2 etc., we find that XI',
1
From (9.4) we can see that the strains are proportional t o the square of the polarization as already stated.
57
58
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1961
Dr. A. .!I Devonuhire on tb
1056
Tn the tomImraturc ranges where the crystal ie respectively cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic and rhombohedra1 equations (8.4) become
.
Y
,..z -
=?
-.- r!,-- -~542’~Jc14.
.
. .
(9.6)
J
Froin the observed stminu and polarizationu we can get some inforinat ion about the constants. ‘rho most convenient quantity t o use is the difference between the strains along the c and *-axes, that is ze-xx, which is given h?r
. . . . .
z,-s,=P~(y12-!/11)/(Cll-clp),
(!).T)t
in cither the tetragonal or the orthorhombic rcgion. This is about 0.01 at room temperature when P, is about 16 nlicrocouloinbs. Hence we have ~ ] 2 - y I l ~ = ( c I * - c I ~ ) %10-’2. 4x
. . . .
.
(9.8)
Similarly in the tetragonal region we have for the volume expansion 2, 4 - Y U t Z Z =€(:’
--y
11
-2g,,)/ (GI 1 +2c, 2).
-
*
*
(9.9)
The volume expanrJion is more difficult to determine since we have to estimate the unstrained volunie by ext’rapolation from the cubic region. However, w e b v c approximately - ( ~ , , + 2 ~ 1 ~ ) I ; : ( c , l f 9 ~ , , ) X o ~ N X10-13.
. . .
(!j.lO).
The shear yz just below t.he second transition temperature is about 14’. Hence we h a w -y,,-c4,x2*7x
In the orthorhombic region we have
+ +
10-12.
. . . . . .
+
(9.11)
.22 Y, 2, =21)2(-Y, 1 -2Y12 1; (c11 2 G l Z ) . * (9,12 )I Hence in all regions the strains can be evaluated in terms of P: and the ratios (gla-gll)/(cl1-c12) and (al f 2 g 1 2 ) i ( c , +2c,2) , given empirically
2 5 Theory $Banurn Titanate - A F Devonshire
159
Theory of Barizcm Titunate.
1057
by (9.8) and (9.10). The calculated strains are given in fig. 7. A term representing the thermal expansion is added SO that the figure shows the total variation of axial length with temperature. By coilsidering the observccl piezoeleotric resonances Mason ( 1 ! ~ 8 ) lias been able to calculate the y's and c's indq~ndent~ly for the ceramic. These quantities might, howe\-er, be very different, for the single crystal, so WT are not able to make use of his results. Fig. 7. .034
0
I,;ittice spacing of BaTi03 relative to bpaciny r r t IW0 ('. ( t lieoretical).
$10. MODELTHEORY.
Our picttwc of barium titanatc is that it is a n ionic crystal, :~ndwe shall follow Born's treatment of ~ 1 1 0 1crystals ~ a3 given by Fowler ( 1 9:W), The ions arc regarded as point centres of forw, and the potentirtl energy of t w o ions with charges and e2 n t a distance T apart is assumed to have the form *--pr-6+
Xr-
9.
The second term represents the \'an der Wads attraction, and the third term the repulsive forces. 'Che potential energy of BaTiO, per iinit cell is then given by the expression
&R)=
7 + -49. la2
3-31(XrI.$-X,,11+ 3Xo0)
1 2.:30(Xo~,+Xoo)
+
(1/A’]( 1.262)y P ~ a / ( d )= (x~a/A’)(-o.047), c 3 = l from Eq. ( 2 0 j , Pool(&) = (xo/A’)(0.939), PObl/(&) = (XO/A‘)(0.046). including terms in - Y T ~but not in ST: These values are strikingly different from those of (23). G I = -5(ff+ (3/2)q2)Xo+6(3q-P)~Xo* +3(#fq)2XBaX0. (24) Only the relative values now have significance; and we see that the polarization is almost entirely contributed In case X T ~S , B XO ~ , are all zero, so that the only by the Ti ions, and the type a oxygen ions. The Ba and polarization comes from the ionic displacement, we type b oxygen ions are hardly polarized a t all. In fact, have c1=0, c2=c3=1, c 4 = - f , and we have at once when we take account of the polarizabilities, we find the values given in the introductory section, that the Ti ions contribute about 37 percent of the total polarization (of which about 31 percent comes from ionic displacement, six percent from electronic polarization), the type a oxygen ions about 59 percent, the type b oxygen ions about six percent, and the Ba in our present notation. However, when we put in the ions about two percent in the reverse direction. We , from (22), determined from the thus see the evidence of the effect which we discussed values of X T ~etc., optical behavior of the material, the situation is entirely in the introductory section: the Ti ions, by their different; we find polarization, polarize the type a oxygen ions; these in turn act back on the Ti ions; and the net result is to c I = 1.834, c2= -5.892, c3=0.385, c 4 = -2.076, K = 3.84+ 1.93/(1- 5.39X1-i’). (26) build up the polarization of both types of ions, resulting in linear chains of dipoles all pointing in the same This important result (26) shows that the effect of direction, the positive end of one to the negative end the polarization of the other ions is greatly to enhance of the other, and producing spontaneous polarization the effect of the ionic displacement of the Ti ions in below the Curie point. producing ferroelectricity. Thus from (25) we see that Now that we have found the influence of the polarizif these other ions were not helping the polarization, ability of the other ions on the dielectric constant, we we should get ferroelectricity only when XTI)=3. On can combine Eq. (26) with an assumption similar to (2), the other hand, from (26), we get the same result when to investigate Curie’s law. I t is clear that, to make the 5.39xTi’= 1, or when X~i’=0.186.This indicates en: denominator of (26) vanish at the Curie point, we must hancement of the effect of the ionic displacement by a assume that factor of approximately 16. Some such enhancement, 5.39XTi’=S.39[aTi’/(too)]= l-C(T-Tc). (27) of course, would arise from the ordinary Lorentz correction. If this correction were applicable in its simple If we insert this value in (26), we find that form, we should get ferroelectricity when K = 3.84+ 1.93/C(T- T J , (28) f ( X ~ i +XTO+ X B.) X o = 1. as a substitute for (3). It is interesting to find that, in We already know that )(XTi+XBa)+xO=0.609. spite of the large change in the general situation proThus we should require that X~I)=3(1-0.609)=1.173, duced by the electronic polarizability, still (28) is not
+
+
76
758
I
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961
J
. c.
s I, .i ‘r I.:
very different from ( 3 ) , so that the qualitative discussion given in the introductory section regarding the temperature coefficient of the ionic polariaability of the Ti ion is still correct. The constant C, however, is now seen to be about 1.3XlOW, instead of the value 2X 10-& given in the introductory section. We may now compare (27) with (12), the ionic polarizability as determined from our molecular model, and ask whether the constants of (12) have reasonable values. Comparing them, we have approximately
5.3Yg2/(2aea~~)= 1, C= [k(3bl+2b1)];a?.
(29)
If we combine these equations, we have (3bl+ 2b,)/a = (5.39Cg2)/( 2 4 ) .
(30)
If we assume that the charge 9 is n times the electronic charge (where n is 4 if the Ti ion is quadruply charged), and use the value of C given above, and v=64X lo-?‘ cc =64X 10-30m3,theright sideof (30) becomes 1.15X 1ff0n2 (m.k.s. units). We can judge whether this value is reasonable or not, by recalling that our expansion of the energy, which in the case of spherical symmetry can be written ar2+br‘+. . ., is really the beginning of a power series, which is bound to diverge, or have a singularity, when the Ti ion gets very close to one of the oxygen ions of the octahedron. This divergence will arise because all terms of the series have the same order of magnitude. Thus we should expect that a t a distance Y where we have a divergence, a y 2 and biA should be of the same order of magnitude, or r2=4/b, where for this crude calculation we may set bl=bz=b. Then b/a= (1.15/5)X1ff0n2=2.30X1019n2, and i2=1/2.30 X 10-1g/n2, I = (2.l/n)XlG-%= 2.l/n angstroms. This is certainly of the right order of magnitude for interatomic distances, showing that the value of b which we have found necessary to explain the Curie constant is of a reasonable magnitude. Since the actual distance between the Ti ion and its neighboring oxygen ion is just 2A, this crude argument suggests that it might be more likely that n should be approximately unity than 4, which we should have with a quadruply charged ion. From (29) we can also estimate the value of the constant a. If we assume again that q equals n electronic charges, we find that a= 7.6n2 ev/(angstron$. That is to say, the energy of the displaced ion, displaced a distance of 1A from its position of equilibrium, would be 7.6n2 volts. This again is of a reasonable order of magnitude, 1A being halfway to the oxygen ion. Here again n = 1 would be more reasonable than n= 4, which would lead to an energy of about 120 volts at a distance of 1.4. Without more detailed study of the interionic forces, however, it is hardly possible to estimate how great the expected restoring forces should be. It is, of course, not inconsistent with the structure of BaTiOs to assume a smaller value of n than 4,which would correspond to the strictly ionic compound. Thus if the oxygen ions on the average were singly rather than doubly charged, the Ti ion would have to have a single
IZ
positive charge. Some evidence as to the charge carried by the Ti ion should eventually become available, when it is known by x-ray measurements exactly how much the Ti ions displace in the spontaneously polarized condition. The magnitude of the spontaneous polarization is known, being equal to about 16X 1 P coulomb/ cm2. We have seen that we may expect about 31 percent of this, or 5 X 1 C 6 , to come from ionic displacement. With a charge of n electronic charges on each ’I’i ion, this would correspond to a displacement of 0 . 2 0 , ’ ) t angstroms. There is some x-ray evidence for a displacement of about l7 0.16A, suggesting n = 1 ; but also some evidence for a smaller displacement,18 suggesting a larger value of n. These questions must await further experimental information. V. THE LORENTZ CORRECTION AND THE FREE ENERGY
In Section IV we have considered only linear terms in the force acting to polarize the various ions. Now we shall pass to the more general problem, where we include higher power terms as in Section 11, but treat the Lorentz correction properly as in Section IV. We shall find it convenient to work backward, starting from the equations for the electric field in terms of the polarization, ending up by integrating these expressions to get a formula for the free energy. First we note that by differentiating (10) with respect to P , we get the z component of the field polarizing the Ti ion. We have
where we have now written the polarization arising from ionic displacement of the Ti ion as PT;. The field acting here is of course the local field, not the external field; in Section I1 we were not taking account of the difference between these two fields. But now, using results of Section IV, we know how to find this local field: it is set up in Eq. (18). I n interpreting that set of equations, we must now distinguish between that part of the polarization of the Ti ions arising from electronic polarization, and that from ionic displacement. We shall call the first part of the polarization P T ~the , second part PT:, so that Eqs. (18) are now where it appears by to be modified by replacing P T ~ P T ~ + P TAs ~ ’ .before, we let X T equal ~ aTi/C02’, where C Y T ~is the electronic polarizability of the Ti ion. The corresponding relation giving the ionic polarizability must now be given by (31), where we recall that the E , appearing in that equation is the local field acting on the T i ion. We may then rewrite Eqs. (18) and (19), modi“Danielson, Matthias, and Kichardson, Phys. Rev. 74, 986 (1948). Kay, Wellard, and Vousden, Nature 163, 636 (1949).
I
2.6 The Lorentz Correction in Barium Titanate - J. C . Slater L O R E N'1'Z
C O It K E C ' r I 0 N
BARIUM
TITANAI'E
77
759
Lorentz correction term is 3X 1.69/0.309= 16.4 times as important as would be given by the simple Lorentz theory. This is the same enhancement factor which we have already met in our discussion of Eq. (26), only now expressed in somewhat different language. In the process of setting up the solution (33), we have had to solve separately for the various polarizations PB*, etc. We shall not give the separate formulas for these quantities, but we shall give the formula for the total polarization P,in terms of P T ~ 'We . find that
=--[
2asol',~,' l+-(3b1+2b2)] kT
h'q2
IN
az
:(lJLT,+PzTL'+ P r d + (q++VJz"&
C"/i,+
+
+(if+f)(Prot,i+ P r o d = P r ~ a j X ~ a , (q$!?)(PrTi+PzTi')+( - p + i ) P z B a
&r+
+ilJzO:t+ €"&+
(fp+ $ ) ( ~ ' z O b l + ~ ' r O b " ) =
PzOa/xO,
( - $q+ S)(PrTi+PrT,')
+(if'+i)PzBaf +fPZObl+
(apff)PzOu
( -p + W * O b z =
PZOblIXO.
62
X [ ~ ~ P = T ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ( P ~ T I ' ~ + P I-T P rITI;L . )I
!$(PrTi+PzTi'+PrBa)f ( - p + j ) P z O ,
€&z+
I+
(-~~+~)(P,OI~I+~~O~~)=P~TI/.~T~I
CS
We are particularly interested in the relation in the case of spontaneous polarization, when E=O, but P and PT,' are not. I n that case, we may combine with (33),and find P z = PIT:[ (CZc3- clc4)/C3c6]. But we can prove, by straightforward algebra, that czc3- c1c4= 652
(32)
There is an equation similar to the last one for I ' z O b Z . We can now solve all equations except the first for P r ~ iP, = BP,o., ~ , P r O b l , PZobzin terms of P=T{and E,. We then substitute these values into the first equation of the set (32), and this becomes an equation relating E , and P T ~ 'containing , now the higher power terms from that equation. When we carry out these steps, which can be simplified by comparison with the similar prohlem involved in finding the first equation of (20), the resulting equation is
Thus the equation above becomes
Pz= ( C 6 / C 3 ) Y r T t ' , (34) under conditions of spontaneous polarization. When we insert numerical values, we find P,= P,~,'/0.309 = 3 . 2 4 P , ~ , ' ,as we have mentioned in earlier paragraphs. We readily verify that above the Curie point, where we are interested in the dielectric constant, this same relation still holds to a first order of accuracy, agreeing with the results of Section IV. We can then use (34) in connection with (33), to express the field in terms of P, rather than P T ~ 'and , find
where and ( J and c 4 are as given in (24). In case the electronic polarizabilities of all the various ions are zero, we have c 3 = c 6 = I, Q = -5, and hence the only effect of the Lorentz correction in (33) is to subtract the term PT,'/3€0 from the right-hand side, or to substitute a local field E+P/3eo for the field E, as we should expect, and as we saw in Eq. ( 1 1 ) . However, when we take account of the electronic polarizability, there are two changes: the Lorentz correction tcrm /'/3c0 is changed from - $ to c4/c6, and the other term is multiplied by a factor a / a . When we insert t h e numerical values which we have been using. we find that C3/cb=0.3@, c 4 / c b = - 1.69. I n other wbrds, the
This expression allows us to integrate Eq. (7), taking account of (lo), to get the free energy A P . We have -4 p = -Y k T In[ (e/iVh3)( r k T ) y 2 m / a )33
+[ N ( kT)'/az]: (36
I+
262)
+2b?(P,2P?+ Pi2PL2+Pi2P:)]+-
c3c4
I*
.
662
2s0
(36)
78
760
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1967 J . C. SLATEK
If we use (34), and express this in terms of PTI',the expression (with the exception of the last term) reduces to the same value (10) which we found earlier (when we remember that the P appearing in (10) is just the ionic polarization of the Ti ions, which we are now calling P T ~ ' )The . last term, however, is not the same as the Lorentz correction function in Section 111. That was - P ~ i ' ~ / 6 ewhereas 0, our term (c3c4/ct)(p1/2e~) can be We verify from (24) that written as (c,/c,)(P~i'~/2eo). 0 the case where the only this reduces to - P ~ i ' ~ / 6 cfor polarization is that of the Ti ion, thus verifying our result; but for the actual case, it is 16.4 times as great, in agreement with previous statements concerning the effect of the correct treatment of the Lorentz correction. Expression (36) is the one which we should use for discussing relations between theory and experiment. We may define the Curie point as the point where the term in P goes to zero. That is,
- ( C I / C B ) ( A ' ~ ~ / ~ E1+kTC(3b1+2b2)/d, OU)=
(37)
to be compared with (14), the formula derived from the simple Lorentz theory, in which c4/c3 is replaced by -4. If we substitute (37) in (36), we can rewrite the term in In in the form (ca/c6)2(ap/1v$)
( k ( T - Tc)/a')(3b1-k2bd.
We can also use (37) to rewrite the other terms of (36) in alternative forms; we can disregard the terms of (37) involving the b's in terms which are small of the first order. When we do this, we find the alternative formula in place of (36), A I' = -NkT In[(e/A7h3)( ~ k T ) ~ ( 2 43 ~/a) (,V(kT)'/~'))t(3b1+2b2) -t( C 4 / ~ 0 G 6 ) ' ( ~ ~ ' / 4 ~ ~ ) ~ T~ (~~) -( 3 h +2 h ) (~,/to~,)'(NQ1/16~')[bt(Pd+ P:+Pz') 2bZ(P,2P,?+ P.PPZ+ P2P,2)].
+ +
+
(38)
This form of the expression is chosen to make comparison easy with Devonshire's formulas. We get agreement with the terms linear in the b's, in Devonshire's Eq. (10.13) (correcting for certain obvious misprints in his equation), if we set his 0 (Lorentz factor) equal to
p= - c r / ( r o c ~ )= - (4rcr)/c6(Gaussian units) =5.09(4r/3). (39)
VI. FREE ENERGY AND ELASTIC STRAIN
The free energy as we have computed it disregards the elastic energy; it is calculated on the assumption that the crystal does not deform when it polarizes. As we have pointed out earlier, this does not lead to the correct formula for the polarization below the Curie point. If we set E,=O in (3.9, solve for P, (assuming that P,= P,=O), and use (37), we have
to
Lac4
as compared with (15), where we have the factor 3 in place of -c&'/c3c4. We find - C ~ ~ / C ~ C ( = 1.93; in other words, the relation between polarization and ternperature is not very different on the correct treatment from the value given in the elementary theory, so that the disagreement between this function and experiment is as bad as that discussed in Section 111. We have already mentioned that, as pointed out by Devonshire, this disagreement is removed by supplementing A P, as given in (38), by additional terms in the elastic strains, and terms involving both strains and polarization components, which therefore are responsible for the piezoelectric effect. The partial derivative of this free energy with respect to one of the strain components then gives the related stress component; if we set the stresses equal to zero we get in this way a set of equations from which we can solve for the various strains under conditions of vanishing stress. We substitute these values in the expression for free energy, and have finally a free energy as a function of polarization components, for the condition of vanishing stress. We find that the resulting correction terms are of the fourth-power in the polarization, hence modifying the fourth-power terms in (38), and changing completely the relation (41), and thus the polarization below the Curie point. Since our argument a t this point follows exactly that of Devonshire, we merely refer the reader to his paper, particularly his Eq. (9.1), giving the free energy in terms of strains and polarizations. To facilitate comparison with his results, we give formulas, in our notation, for various coefficients appearing in his paper, his Eqs. (10.14), (10.15), (10.16):
That is, for these terms, we must use a Lorentz correction 5.09 times as great as given by the elementary theory. On the other hand, in the terms independent of the b's, leading to the value of the Curie temperature, we get agreement with Devonshire's values if we use a value of fl equal to p= -c4/(e0c3) = - (4rc4)/cr(Gaussian units) = 16.4(47/3), (40) thereby bringing about agreement between our Eq. (36) Devonshire has made some attempt to compare the and Devonshire's (10.17). In other words, no single modified Lorentz factor will take care of the whole iiumerical predictions of the theory with experiment, and it is obvious that the present paper, making very correct Lorentz treatment, as we have developed it.
2.6 The Lorentz Correction in Barium Titanate - J. C. Slater EVAPORATION OF 71NC AND ZINC OXIDE
large changes in some of the coefficients, will invalidate most of that comparison. We shall not attempt a t this time, however, to make an alternative comparison with experiment. There are two ways in which this comparison can be made. First, the observed Curie temperature permits an evaluation of q2/a, and the temperature dependence of the dielectric constant gives us (3b,+2bn) la?. We have already considered the resulting values of these constants, and have shown them to be of reasonable order of magnitude. To check them better we should have to have an elaborate study of the structure of the crystal from the standpoint of atomic theory, in order to be able to compute the interionic forces. Devonshire has given such a theory in a rather elementary way, but the writer believes that a more elaborate treatment would be necessary before the results could have great pretensions to accuracy. On the other hand, the behavior of the polarization below the Curie point gives information about the coefficients of the fourth-power terms (and sixthI'ower terms, which Devonshire also has to introduce),
I
79
761
but modified by the contributions resulting from the elastic strain. If the elastic and piezoelectric constants of single crystals were known accurately enough, we could evaluate these modifications, and then we should be able to find the b's independently from the fourthorder terms, as well as from the second-order terms, and hence have a valuable internal check of the theory. Unfortunately, these elastic and piezoelectric constants are not known su5ciently well. It is to be hoped that future experiments will supply this missing information. I n the meantime, it can be said that there does not seem to be anything about the present form of the theory which does not have a good chance of agreeing with experiment, when better experimental data are available. The writer is greatly indebted to his colleague Professor A. von Hippel for stimulating his interest in the problem, and for useful discussions; and to Drs. W. Shockley and P. W. Anderson of the Bell Telephone Laboratories, for valuable exchange of information regarding the work on the subject of those Laboratories.
80
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1961
JOURNAL
OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPANVOL
7, NO 1, JAN-FEE, 1952
Phase Transitions in Solid Solutbn~of l?bZrOs and PbTiOs (I) small concennatione of PbTiOa By Gen SHlRA6E and Akitsu TAKEDA lbkyo Inslitule of Tsehnology. Oh-okayanur. Talcgo (Received Marell 2s. 1961) The dielectric, ealcjrimctric and dilntnmetric mwumments have bee11 made on the solid aolutiom F’b(Zr-Ti)Os which contain d l amounts o(: PbTiOa lam than 10%. E d d a the ordinary a r b pobt nesr 220°C, the existence of another transition, for example 140W in Pb(Zr95-Tib)08, waa confirmed. It seem8 reasOnable to interpret these two transitions phase changa from punelectric state tu termelectric one and further to antifermektrio one. Whereas the uppr trannition temperature ia marly coIlrtant for tlm concentrations, tlm lower trmition temperature increasta with decreasing Ti mncf!ntratbn snd both temperatma seem to coincide at pure Pbzlos. Therw resulds suggest tlmt Pb7dx m a y be antiforroe!ectric below its Curie point 220°C.
curie point previously reported by Waku and Hori through their permittivity measurements. In part I these phase transitions in solid solutions near the pure lead zirconate side shall be reported. Investigations on the whole range of d i d solutions, especially those on the crystal structure will be reported in part 11.
5 1. Introduction Whereas it is certain that lead titanate’) is a fermlectric of BaTG t y e ) , lead zirconate is not at all a ferrq&ctric but may surely be antifemelectric, for recent investigations3Jhave established many essential differences between the two materials all Wig in support of the above statement. Moreover, though the both are belonging to a tetragonal modification of perovskite structure,4Jthe signs of tetragonality of them are indeed in the opposite sense, namely c/u= 0.988 for lead zirconate while C / U = 1.053 for lead titanate. It is worth investigating whether these two characteristic contrasts, dielectric and structural ones, do imply any inner relationship to each other. And it may be desirable to inquire whether some peculiar properties are to be found if solid solutions were to be formed between the two. Fortunately Waku and HoriS) found in 1949 that these two materials really form solid solutions. Rut since they believed at that time the components are both ferroelectrics. they paid no special attention to the most interesting region, tliat is the very regio? wherein the tetragondlity of tlte niixed crystnl npproaclics unity. Now we have carried out detailed invesligatioris on specific heRt, thcnnal expansion and crystal structure as well as dielectric properties over the whole concentration range of this binary system,and we found in solid solutions conraining small amounts of PbTiOa the existence of another transition besides the ordinary
2. Permittivity Measurement. The specimens were prepared from reagentgrade PbO, ZrOy and TiO,. The ingredients were mixed in the desired proportions and then sinkre3 at about 1200°C after preliminary calcination. No special precaution, such as deso ribed by R ~ b e r t s , ~was ) paid for preventing the evaporation of lead oxide during the sbtering process. The dielectric test samples, 0.5cm’ in area and 0.1cm in thickness, were coated on both sides with a conductive silver paint, which was then fired at about 600°C. The capacity of these specimens was measured by a resonance method at a frequency of lMC/sec and a field strength of about 10V/cm. Fig. 1 shows the dielectric constant versus rising temperature curves for PbZrOn,PbiZr95Ti5)Q and Pb(Zr90-Ti10)Oa. With increasing I%Ti03 concentration, the Curie point of these solid solutions at first slightIy decreases from 220°C of pure PbZrO?’)oJ and then increases towards 490°C for pure PbTiO2). In Pb(2r97.5-Ti2.5)O3, another small peak was observed at 180T basides the sharp maximum at the Curie point. This small peak corresponds to another transition as shown in the 6
2.7 Phase Transitions in Solid Solutions ofPbZr0, and PbTiO,
-8-
6
,yx)
.
LOf L \ b I ~ W A (0
RLh-LdJa
‘.‘Aw J
J
-W
I
I
81
fi:
polarization from theae fiw. Fig. 4 shows the maximum polarization PIW the r e m a n e m polarization P, and the spontaneous polarization P. a t rising temperature. The residual polarization above the Curie point may be accounted for by the conduction term a t these relatively high temperatures. So we assume that the broken line shown in the figure can be interpreted as a superfluous effed due spontaneous
(P #
L
170°C
(Vol. 7,
2. Though these hyetereeis loop do not show sutficient saturation at this kld strength of 17KV/cnr, yet we can roughly estimate the
Q)
0
Shurane, A. Takeda
k A k h TAKWA ~
2mo
R”nq
- G.
-w(,-(>
“1000
Fi;, t’ 1 [yntcrclrria Iwqw ( d 1’b(Zr9&l‘i5)02 15,m+~ =: 17 ~W/CUI.
53. Hysteresis Loopa. Dielectric properties of these solid solutions were also studied from the temperaturedependcnce of hysteresis loops using a method sliglitly modified from Sawyer and Tower’s”. All specimens are of nearly the same dimensions, I.0cm3in area and 0.1 cm in thickness. Meaw e m e n t was made in a liquid paraffin which Waa bzing stirred VigorouSl~in order to obtain
ai;
riaiii:
ttllll~x?r:lLclN!.
It must be noticed that a smiill pciik at 140°C i n the permittivity curve is just corresponding to‘ the appearance of the spontaneous polnrization at this point. This result is to be mnipsreJ with the case of pure PbZrO.,’), of which the hysteresis loops are almost always linear helow the Curie mint. The hysteresis loops of Pb(ZflO-TiLO)O, show the ferroelectric c h x a cteristic even a t mom tmperature (Fig. 3). This fact suggests that the lower transition may
82
I
2 Selected Early Work 1927-1961 7
19.52)
mw
m a
llO0a
Fig S Hptermis loops d Pb(7&Ti10)0~.
$4.
Ln~=20/KVm.
Efftct of D.C. Biasing Field an the Permittivity.
ICI
2m
IY)
~9
Tugrraturr W )
A study was made of the effect of a D.C. biasing fmld of 10KV/cm upon the dielectric constant of Pb(Zr95-Ti5)Ox with the reeult shown in Fig. 6. Above the lower transition t e m p r a t m of 14OoC, remarkable decrease of permittivity waa observed and at the same time the Curie point of 215'C was raised by about 5OC. These phenomena are quite similar to those f o d m BaTiGa)9), and, combined with the data of the spontaneous polarization, show therefore that the intermediate phase of this material between 140°C and 215OC is surely a ferroelectric one.
Fig. 4. Maxiinurn polarization PO,rernaormce p l a r h t i o n P, and spontnnecw polarimtlon. P, d Pb(Zr%-Ti5)OJ at rising tampcrature.
L Y)
I
I0
I
I50 Temprdurr
I
m (.II
I
zn
Fig. 6. SponLenmrr plnrkmrtion of Pb (LrUi~Ti6)0, a t viiryinx toinwature, l1eatin3 and cooling rnte bcinx about I°C/rnin. OOCUT below t h w o o m temperature for this
*ante.
On the other hand, below 140"C, the only effect of biasing fEld is to shift this transition point towards lower temperature by about 5°C.
2.7 Phase Transitions in Solid Solutions ofPbZr0, and PbJiO, - G. Shurane, A. Takeda
a
8 Akhm TAKEDA
Glen 6-
Fig. 7 b w s the dielectric constant ofP b Z a I Pb(Zr95-Ti5)Q and F'b(Zr9o-TilO)Cb measured at mom temperature (15°C) and at 1MC/ em versus the biasing voltage. obeervd decrease of permittivity in Pb(Zr90-TilO)O~ is in accordance with the hysteresis loops of this substance shown in Fig. 3.
-I
I
I
1
\\
U)
sI
(Vol. 1,
.-3
0
uc.C;s&..e
15
plA \xr/cm\
Fig. 7. PerrniLtiviLy of PbZrO,,
20
Pb
(~r~~-i-Tij)OlAndPb(%rDO TilU) 0) vmtm D.C. b i i n g voltage.
5 6 . Specific Heat.
____---
the jump of spontaneous polarization. With the observed value of dTc/dE and the transition energies, we get for the change of spontaneous polarization APs= 10 microcoulomb/cmzat 140°C and dPs=-15 rniaocoulomb/m* at 215°C. These results are in tolerable agreement with direct observation on the oscillograph and suggest' that the spontaneous polarization surely be absent below 140°C. Thus the above experiments have shown that in the lowest phase below I4O0C, Pb(Zr95-Ti5) 0, may not have spontaneous polarization at if ,ii were trulf t h e phase should necessarily b e eithq paraelectric or antiferroelectric. Now as will be shown in the phase diagram (Fig. 13), this lowest phase has to be coitinuously connected to the phase of pure PbZrO,below its Curie point, and this, clearly, mest inevitably be either ferroelectric or antiferroelectric. Hence it seems reasonable 10 assume that the lowest phase of abovesolid solutions, and conscqriently also that of Pb%rO;r itself, may belong to the category of antiferrocleclrics, namely, in which each dipole is certainly subject to some restraint but its alignment never amounts to a net polarization as a whole. Fig. 9, shows the specific heat curve of Pb(Zr97.5-Ti2.5jO:,, in which the lower transition was'observed at 180°C in the permittivitv measurement. As might have been expected, two peaks were really observed in this curve, and the transition energies are estimated at 130 cal/mole (at 180'C) and 160 cal/rnole (at
In order to obtain the more detailed information concerning the two phase transitions in F'b(Zfi5-Ti5)O3, we have measured the specific heat of this specimen. Use is made of an adiabatic calorimeter of Nagasaki-Takagi typelo), which is an iinprovcmmt of Sykes' onc. I'nwdered specimen of about 25 g, contained in a d a s s vessel of 2.5 R. wits heated by ;I r a t c of about Z"C/min. Specific heat versus rising temperature curve of this specimen is shown in Fig. 8. This cllrve shows a small hump at about 140 C besides a sharp maximum at 215"C, and the transition e m v i e s are estimated respectively at 83 c:II/ mole and 180 cal/mole. If we assume tentatively these transitions are of the first order, the Clnpeymn-Clausius equation should be available at these points, i.e. -dTc/dE= Tc-APS/L were TC denotes the 22OOC).
83
1 :..A
-u
-1
I
84
I
2 Selected Early Work 19221-19621
Phars
1952)
Il).cmriPionr
'sub Y)
t
1
I
in Wfi-TtY, (0
9
I J
Fig. 9. Bpeoiba best d Pb(W.S-TIB.S)@
4 6. Dielectric Reddual Polarization. Though above ercperiments. espcially the observation on an millograph, have &own that the spontaneous polarization of Pb(ZS-Ti5)Oa really disappearsbelow W C , leading u to the amurnption of antiferrmlactridty of the bw-t pbak, yet the similnt-phenomw WaJd be obeerved if, alternatively, the coercive &Id were to inmeam auddsntJr at llo°C leaving the muinsic p&rizatim mchmgd. To uiticize the latter poesibility amn directly, we have carried out the following experiments. It is well known that BaTi4 ceramicscan be permancntiy polarized by an adequate input of high D.C.tieldo). So, for the m s a u e p e n t afthe residual p o & i d Pb(Z1S-Ti5)oa. we have& the 8ame specimen as that for the obeervaLian of hyatereaia loope. At 160°c, which is in ferroelectric region, both electrodes of the specimen were at first oonnected to a biasiag D.C. voltage of 10KV/onfor 5 minutea and then to a galvammter drcuit. After an initial discharging cwnmt had disappeared, we raised the temperature at a coDletant rate and found a h a r p maximum of discharging current at the Curie point, as shown achematically in Fig. 10(a). Thb phenomenon is quite similar to that obeerved in barium titanate ceramics.") After the same polarizing treatment at 160°C, now the temperature was lowered at the same rate as in heating. We observed,' in this case bo. a discharging current shown in Fig. 1O(b) a h a rather &it marhum at W a c . which -da to the h e r tramition point on -(Fig. 5). What is to be noticed hsn in tbe time mlegral of discharging currant d'hmting is nearly tk-mme order of magni-
4 t
I
1
ia
19
Tns.dmvr\l)
Fig. 10. &hematk &m ktg and -kbg
I
Z
W
'
of dieohsrgCarrenb d
Pb(zrsJn6pawharthetampastme is r a i d or amled by R
-
coastont mtc.
(a),
(b) dischsrgiw current
afkr polariing beatmetit at
160°C. (a> ahorbing and diac h a m anrrmt without pols-
r i h g timatmat.
In the c o r n of above experiments, we found the following intenstine phencunenon. Once the specimen is highly polarized in ferroelectric region, it begins to show an absorbing and discharging currents as shown in Fig. 10 [ c ) , even after it is heated until above the Curie point. The currents are however not IarKe and b m e the less pronounced a8 the more frequently m the heat treatment repeated. This Phenomenon mumably m a y be due to som mall internal strain perhaps made up initially by a polarizing field and Wing afterward until above the Curie point. If it is cooled again,
::/
2.7 Phase Transitions in Solid Solutions ofPbZr0, and PbTiO, - G. Shurane, A. Takeda
~~~kndtopdruitstimepaciman bo,,@@,~dbsalion -wmitatim .
anrJIlsianhsmtyetbssnM,iteeane that,the olreerved curienta in fieun (c) am iWWdQWdY-
totanprahMdsri-
*
v&vu of the valua of Epanmmm ~laiiGathn dmwn in Fig. 5.
I7. ! r i w m d Ihrpmdon. Linear thermal expansion of l'b(Z195-Ti5)ol wan measured at tempaatureafram -150'Cto m*c, and the d o u s Mlume ChangeB of thia epecimen give a further support for the
d i d i t y of the aseumptiOn pmpoaed above. Ditometric teat samples were cut out from ceramic disks and have cylindrical form of 3 an in length and 0.5 an in diametar. Werential dilatation of this spedmen agah& eili tubewas magnihdabout1OOOtimeaaslarge by IneaIm of an optical hvsr. Fa.11 &owe (Z--h)/has a functim of tanmature, Ghen I0 ie the length of ebe epecimenatOOC. Heating and eodig rate is about I"C/min. Thia figure aham large anomaha volume dmngm at about 140% and 215°C. Large thenna hyetereais on abling i e to be cunpared with the cdcrea p o d i Meresin of spontaneous polarization (Fig. 5).
-Joe
0
Kx)
200
w,
TlnpratutcvCI
Fig. 11.
Ltnear tbermal expamion of w
-comparieon of
this result with the volume changes obeerved in PbZr41) and J3aTiOl*2)~~) cbdyebowathatthesignsofvolumechanges at the two tramitions are quite consistent with the aermned eharaaeristh of the three phasea
y.u.4 '
&XO,
1 -
0 .
I
I
85
86
I
-
2 Selected Early Work 1921-1961 1952)
ma38 l).lluibionr
Pb(*nfi
(0
11
turmsre tbrn thaw, of orones by .bout lV-WC. So we think that if we had been -a to avail ouralves of ZrO, of high purity all this experiment, ,we would be to o b t h all phase boundaries higher than thoee in Fq. 13 each by about l(P-15"C. In conclusion,we wish to express our sincere thanks to Profasor Y. Takagi for his kind guidance in the cou~geof this research and t8 Mr. C. Kanzaki for taking troubles of chemical analysis of pure ingredient. We are aiso grateful to Mr.J. Hori for stimulatingour intereat in this problem and to Mr. E. Sawaguchi for his helpful diacusibns. References pig.
d the P b m ptJriotsgs(sm.
IS. Rhas
border line may +hap
be between 7-7.5 in
Ti amcentratloo at3hs room temperahwe, for a study of thsdielectricpropsties of PbCZ192.5Ti7.6)oI shown that it ie already ferroslectric at room tanperatwe. An X-ray study of the CIyBtal atructurs of this system performed at rooan temperature aIs0 dram a line of danarcation of Werent phaees at t h e crmpoeitioaa. Detaile Of X-ray study will be d d in part 11. For the study of t b m eolid solutions, ape m is the puity of Zro,, cially of i w h i c h d l y o c a t a i n e si and Ti as impuritioa. Spectroscopic analysis of our ZIQ* chows the existence of a few percents of Si as impurity. Effectof thin impurity on the phase d m was examiued from a preliminary etudy of dielectric properties of PbZzQ and Pb(Zr95-Ti5) 01 prepared from 2x0, of high purity which contained as impuritb only small amounts of Ti(0.21%), Si(O.o9%] and Fe(O.W%J The phase tramitiom obeerved in these specimezle are completely of the same nature as described above except that all the transition tempera-
1) Q.Bhir~u~eaodS. Houhiao, J. Phga. Bac. Japan. 6 (1961) 266. 2) Sea, for imtanoe. A vm Eippl, R e v . Mod. P b . 22 (1860) 221. 8) E. &m@, G. 8hSr8ne and Y. Taaei J. Pbp. 8oa 6 (1961) 885. 4) ED. Ma34w. P m Phjn. 8oa. W o n . 68 (1946) 19s. 6) W ~ L Usod J. ~ o r i reported , at the a m miiteator ths PieaOelectr10 Mataid, Tokyo, Mny 1,
a
1850.
6) 8. Rakata, J. Am. &ram. h., SS(1960)63. 7) 0. Smwyex and 0. T o m , Php. hv., 35
(laso)
289.
8 ) 8. Bober& Phys: Rev., 71 (1947) 890. 9) LE (kor& A.T. Dermieon. XM. N m h and R. wbiddrnsto * n,Namra,163(1940)6S&. A 10) 8. N@I and Y. Takagl, J. App. Phys. Japan, 17 (1948) 1C4. 11) E. 8swagwhi pDa T. Akioh, J. P b p SOC. Japm, 4 (lQ49) 117. IS) 8. Sawn& and Q. Bhiraqe, J. Pbp. Boo. Jspaa, 4 (lQ49) 62. 13) Q. 8hlram ard A. Tatada, J. Phga. SOC. Japan, 6 (1961) 128.
2.8 Dielectric Constant in Perovskite Type Crystals - J. H. Barrett 187 PHYSICAL REVIEW
VOLUME 86.
NUMBER
APRIL
1
1.
1952
Dielectric Constant in Perovskite Type Crystals JOHN H. BARREIT* Rice Instilute, Houston, Texas (Received December 26, 1951)
Slater’s theory of the dielectric constant in BaTiOa has been extended by treating the ionic polarizability quantum mechanically instead of classically. This leads to an expression for the dielectric constant which is good at all temperatures and shows a deviation from the Curie-Weiss law at low temperatures. The theory is applied to SrTiOa and to KTaOi above its transition at 132°K.
INTRODUCTION
LATER has proposed a theory’ to explain the dielectric behavior of BaTiOa, a t least above its Curie temperature. His model treats the crystal as though the Ba and 0 ions were fixed in position and as though each Ti ion acted like an independent harmonic oscillator with small additional anharmonic terms. The Ti ion is supposed to be very loosely bound, and the only interaction between these oscillators is through the electric field. The system was then treated by statistical mechanics in a completely classical fashion. I t seemed desirable to find also the results of a quantum-mechanical treatment, particularly a t low temperatures.
S
I. DERIVATION OF THE QUANTUMMECHANICAL FORMULA
Following Slater, let the potential energy of the Ti ion in an electric field be given by #J=
~(.”+r2+22)+b1(3C4+Y4+24)+2b2(.”Y2+.”z~+y~z*)
-q(xEz+~Eu+zEJ. (1) Let the part of independent of the b’s be called #J1 and the part containing the b’s be called & The #J2 will be treated as a perturbation. Using #Jl as the potential energy in the Hamiltonian operator, the problem is just that of a simple harmonic oscillator in an electric field, and the energy levels are given by #J
Wlnrn0=(I+m+n+$)hv-q2,?P/4a. (2) These energy levels are degenerate, so that the first-order perturbations to the energy levels must be obtained by solving a series of determinants. For any group of levels having the same unperturbed energy, the sum of the energy perturbations is equal to the sum of the diagonal matrix elements. Assuming that the energy perturbations are small with respect to kT, one can use the approximation exp(-x) = 1 --x in computing the partition function. The justification of this approximation will be considered in Sec. 111.Let the first-order perturbation energies be denoted by Wlmnl and the diagonal matrix elements by (ZmnI&?IZmn).Then, using the approximation for the exponential given above, it can be seen that the diagonal matrix elements may be used 1
Holder of Gen. Elec. Charles A. Coffin fellowship. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 78, 748 (1950).
in place of the true first-order energy perturbations to compute the partition function. The diagonal matrix elements are given by
(CmnI $2 I Zmn) =b1((3/4PL)[(21~+21+1)+ (2m2+2m+ 1 ) +(2nz+2n+1)l+(342/4u2P)C(2C+ 1)E3 (2m+ 1)E,2+ (2n+ 1)E21 (qY16u4)CE2+ Ei+E,41) +2b~((1/4P2)[(21+1)(2m+l)+ (214- 1)(2n+ 1) (2m+1)(2n+ 1)1+(q2/8a28)C(21+ 1)(E,2+EdL)
+ + +
+(zm+l)(E,2+E,2)+(2n+l)(E,2+E,2)1
+(g4/16u4)CE2E,2+E2E,2+E,2E,21),
(3)
where P=2a/hv. Let B be the partition function for a single oscillator, and let Z = z N / N ! be the partition function for a system of N oscillators. The polarization ) T , A E = -KT InZ. is given by Pi= - ( ~ A E / ~ E ,where Now one obtains for (YT~’, the ionic polarizability resulting from the Ti ion, ( l / N ) ( P x / & ) = (q2/2a)[1- ((3b1+2bz)h/2a2) Xcoth(hv/2kT)]. (4)
(YT~’=
It should be noted that this formula is applicable only above the Curie temperature in the unpolarized or nonferroelectric state. The above treatment will reduce to Slater’s if kr>>hv. 11. APPLICABILITY OF THE QUANTUMMECHANICAL FORMULA
In order to see how K depends on XT~’=(YT~’/QV for perovskite crystals in general, where v is the volume of the unit cell, one must consider the Lorentz correction as Slater has done in his paper. This will be done here in less specific fashion. Because of the linearity of a set of equations such as his Eqs. (18) and (19) relating the polarization to the field, one will get, K
=A
+B/(1-DXT~‘).
(5)
Slater’s Eq. (26) is a particular example of this relation for BaTiO,. The values of A , B, and D will depend on the values of the electronic polarizabilities of the various atoms in the lattice and on the geometry of the lattice. ) be the only temperature dependent The X T ~will quantity in K. 118
88
I
2 Selected Early Work 7927-1967 DIELECTRIC CONSTANT IN
119
PEROVSKITE CRYSTALS
well. From the value of K near O'K, T1 can be computed to be about 60°K. This explains why the dielectric M constant is observed experimentally to begin to deviate K= from a Curie-Weiss law around 50°K. #Ticoth(T1/2T)-To Another ferroelectric to which this might be expected where (6) hv 2&ovB to apply is KTaOs above its transition to the ferroelecTi=-, M= tric state. Hulm, Matthias, and Lon? have reported the k qz(3b1+2bz)kD' behavior of the dielectric constant of this compound a t low temperatures. The behavior in this case is like that of curve (c) in Fig. 1 down to the transition temperature To= 2a8sv (Z-1). q2(3b1+2bJkD 2aco~ of 13.2"K. The graph given in their article can be fitted fairly well by Eq. (6), but exactly how well The behavior of K as given in Eq. (6) is shown in Fig. 1. cannot be determined merely by taking values from For T>>T1,+TIcoth(TJ2T) asymptotically approaches the graph.t T and (6) becomes a Curie-Weiss law. As T approaches I t also seems of interest that the behavior of O'K, K will approach M/(+T,-To). Roughly, it may LiT1C1HnOs.H20, reported recently by Matthias and be said that Tl is the dividing point between the low Hulm,' follows something of the nature of Eq. (6) above temperature region where quantum effects are im- its transition to the ferroelectric state. Of course the portant and K deviates from a Curie-Weiss law and the theory given here could not be expected to fit this case high temperature region where a classical approximation because of the entirely diilerent crystal structure. and a Curie-Weiss law are good. If a material undergoes However, any model having discrete energy levels will a transition to the ferroelectric state a t a temperature cause K to level off near absolute zero, because the above T1,the quantum effect will be unnoticed. system settles into the ground state and thereby loses Now we shall see how this theory applies to BaTi08. its temperature dependence. Using Slater's value of a= 7.6na ev/Az= 1.2X lo%* joules/mz and m as the mass of the Ti atom gives III. JUSTIFICATION OF THE APPROXIMATION TO THE EXPONENTIAL T1=410n degrees absolute, where n is now the number of electronic charges on the T i ion. Since the CurieI n Sec. I exp[(Zmn( q5zlZmn)/kT] was approximated Weiss law holds in BaTiO, down to the transition as l-[(lmn1q5*(Zmn)/RT]. The validity of this must temperature at about 390°K, 12 cannot be much above 1. be examined after the values of certain constants are Consider the values of the constants in Eq. (6) in determined. Assuming bl= bz= b and using the formula the case of BaTiOa. Experimentally M = 1.5X106, T0=39O0K, and Slater has computed] B=1.93. This gives 2ascov/[q2(3bi+ 2bz)kDI- lo6, (7) (Dq2/2~co~-1)-4X lo4. Combining (4) and (5) and noting that A is negligible,
The last quantity can be said to be zero, so that a=Dqz/2eov as Slater has given in his Eq. (29) with D = 5.39. Now it seems reasonable that the quantities considered just above, excepting TO,will be of the same order of magnitude for other compounds of the same structure as BaTi03. The Tocan vary quite drastically because it is determined by the difference of two very nearly equal quantities. Nevertheless, it will still be expected that the latter order of magnitude relationship given in (7) will not be exceeded and that a is still given by a= D$/2eov. In particular SrTiO, might be expected to behave in the same manner as BaTiO3 with a different TO.Hulm2 has reported the dielectric constant of SrTiOs to follow a Curie-Weiss law down to about 50°K. He found M=8.4Xl(r, To=-35°K. Below 50°K the dielectric constant falls below the Curie-Weiss law and approaches a value of 1300 in the neighborhood of O'K. A curve of the form (a) in Fig. 1 seems to fit these facts quite f
J. K. Hulm, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A63, 1184 (1950).
I
T1
T
FIG.1. Curve a : To= -0.25T1;Curve b : To=O; Curve G: To=0.25T1.
* Hulm, Matthias, and Long, Phys. Rev. 79, 885 (1949).
t Note d c d in proof:-The author has recently obtained by private communication precise measurements of the dielectric constants of KTaOt from Hulm, Matthias, and Long and of SrTiO, from J. F. Youngblood. Equation (6) fits the data quite well both for SrTiOs and for KTaOI above 13.2'K. The value of TIobtained by fitting Youngblood's data is about 100°K. However, this higher value does not appreciably affect any of the results of this paper. 'B. T. Matthias and J. K. Hulm, Phys. Rev. 82, 108 (1951).
2.8 Dielectric Constant in Perovskite Type Crystals - J. H. Barrett 189
120
JOHN H. BARRETT
IV. DISCUSSION for a and the definition of M given below Eq. (6), b/a2=B/5Mk. Now it can be seen from Eq. (3) that We may expect the quantities involved in the theory the validity of the approximation in question depends -excepting To-to be roughly of the same magnitude on b/TkT!d) which then leads to an exponential law for the switching time [Eqs. (4) and (7)]. On the other hand, we have to assume that a t high fields (region I11 of Figs. 2 and 7) the rate of nucleation is extremely large so that the switching time is primarily determined by the velocity This then leads to the of the domain walls (Id>!,). linear dependence of l/t, on E, Eqs. (4) and (6), as observed experimentally. Since it appears that a t high fields ld>>l,, then t , must deviate from the behavior described in Eq. (7) at fields higher than 15 kv/cm and must decrease much faster than described by this equation. With this assumption, the fit with the experimental results is very good (Fig. 7).
In the introduction a two-step process was proposed for the switching in ferroelectrics: nucleation of domains and domain wall motion. The experimental results just discussed will be interpreted on the basis of this model. Let us define the “nucleation time 1,” as the time necessary to form all nuclei, from the first to the last, and the “domain wall motion time, Id” the time necessary for one domain to grow through the sample. The total switching time can then be approximated by tEL+td.
(4
We assume that the domain wall motion can be described by v=d/td=pE=pI/’/d, (5) where d is the distance the wall travels and p is the mobility of the domain wall. In Eq. (5) the coercive field strength for domain wall motion is neglected. This assumption agrees with the experimental results. From Eq. (5) it follows that l/td=
pE/d= KE=pV/d2,
(6)
with K = p / d . On the other hand, we assume in our model that the nucleation of new domains is governed by a statistical law, in which at low jields, the probability of forming new domains depends exponentially on the applied field in the following*way: Pn=$o
FIG. 7. Reciprocal switching time I[/*, domain wall motion time l/k, and nucleation time l/6. uclsus applied field E for TGS.
exp(-culE),
and hence (l/ln) = (l/to) exp(--a/E). (7) This particular dependence of nucleation time on electric field fits our experimental results on TGS as will be shown, and further this form is the same as that found for BaTiO3.l By proper choice of the parameters
0
Also the quadratic thickness dependence of the switching time at high fields (E> lo4 v/cm) as shown in Fig. 5 fits our model [see Eq. (6)]. At this point, however, it is important to distinguish between domain wall motion in the forward and sidewise directions. The fact that we do observe a quadratic dependence on crystal thickness indicates that in TGS the forward motion is very much faster than any sidewise motion, under the assumption that the mobility I.( is not field dependent. Before we can discuss other experimental results we have to develop our model further, which will be done now. 4. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE
PROPOSED MODEL
Some of the properties of the nucleation time I,,, domain wall motion time td, rise time 1’ and decay time I” are summarized in Tables I and 11. I t can be concluded from the relationships described in Tables I and
2.10 Switching Mechanism in Jriglycine Sufate and Other Ferroelectrics- E. Fatuzzo, W. J. Men
SWITCHING MECHANISM
I1 that it is not unreasonable to attempt to correlate the shape of the switching pulse with the two switching mechanisms by identifying 1" with 1, and 1' with f d . It is difficult, however, to understand why the rise time, which precedes the decay time, should be due to domain wall motion, which must follow nucleation. For the reversal of polarization we consider three states for each nucleus: A+lJ-+C
( A ) latent nucleus, not formed yet; number=n,; ( B ) nucleus formed; number= n z ; (C) nucleus grown through the sample; number= n3. 4.1. Transition
TABLE I. Relationship between 4 and t,,.
_____
- -~
Intermediate fiplds
Low fields
hO, the crystal makes a first-order transition to a tetragonal phase at a temperature exceeding T,. Equation (10) r e fers to the "free" crystal; the potential V, cannot therefore be used as it stands to give wT in a noncubic phase, since, for the lattice vibrations, the crystal is "clamped" by its inertia. At the cubic-tetragonal transition the atoms become displaced a relative amount uo= (3 1 B I /4B')",
along a crystallographic axis, say [OOl]. The minimum T.O. frequency i s reached just before the transition, and is given by
Expressions for the spontaneous polarization as
a function of temperature, etc., are also obso that a Curie-Weiss law is followed with a Curie constant
C =(c +2)'(Z1e)*/9uR,,'y z ( c +2)/4ny.
-
-
(8)
The condition c0 00 i s thus OT' 0. The ionic polarizability of one unit cell is found to be given by ai=(Z'e)a/R0 ',
(7)
while the electronic polarizability is as usual given by 4nae/3tJ
=(E
- l)/(E
+2).
(8)
The condition wT'=O is therefore the same as (9) so that the terms "instability" and "polarizability catastrophe" are synonymous in this instance. If one now postulates that the short-range potential between the two Bravais lattices Is neither precisely harmonic nor precisely isotropic for comparatively large displacements, it can be shown that the crystal may become spontaneously polarized without becoming completely unstable. Instead it makes a transition to another
tained in terms of the above atomic parameters. As the temperature decreases still further the crystal makes a second transition in which the atoms become relatively displaced along [Oll], followed by a third which leaves them displaced along [ l l l ] . These results will be understood when it is pointed out that Eqs. (3) and (10) lead eventually to an expression for the free energy C, of the unstressed crystal which i s almost identical with that postulated by Devonshire.8 The theory has been extended to apply to antiferroelectric transitions in diatomic crystals, and to ferroelectric transitions in other cubic crystals, including barium titanate. The equations which apply to the latter are greatly simplified by assuming that in the T.O. mode of lowest frequency (there are three T.O. modes in all), or in a static field, the framework of oxygen atoms is not distorted. The crystal structure a n a l y ~ e s ~of, ' ~tetragonal barium titanate and lead titanate support this assumption. The dielectric properties of barium titanate, and the movements of barium and titanium atoms relative to the oxygen octahedron, may be accounted for by assuming a temperature dependence of certain atomic parameters analogous to that given by Eq. (3), and a short-range po413
2.1 I Crystal Stability and the Theory of Ferroelectricity
VOLUME3, N U M B E R 9
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
tential for relative movement of titanium and oxygen atoms given by Eq. (10). A very small departure from a harmonic potential is found to be sufficient to account for the dielectric properties, and,the numerical values required for other atomic parameters are physically reasonable. The equation corresponding to Eq. (4), applicable to a perovskite-type crystal, is found to be ( w2 w3 04 ) L" ( w 2 w3 (L'4 ) 7 z = € 0 /€.
(11)
- W.
Cochran
I
lo'
NOVEMBER 1 , 1959
quency range should yield interesting results. The statement that the problem of the onset of ferroelectric properties in any cr y st al is a problem in lattice dynamics is probably correct, but a t present there is little prospect of detailed application of the theory of lattice dynamics to low-symmetry or disordered crystals. I a m indebted to a number of colleagues, especially Dr. B. N. Brockhouse, for helpful comments on this work.
(This result does not depend on the assumption *On leave f r o m Crystallographic Laboratory, Cavenof an undistorted oxygen framework.) The infr a r e d absorption frequencies ( ( L ' and ~ ) ~( w ~ ) ~ dish Laboratory, Cambridge, England. lM. Born and K. Huang, Dynamical Theory of Cryshave been measured by Last," and are in no way tal Lattices (Oxford University P r e s s , Oxford, 1954). unusual. It follows from the theory that ( C L ~ ) ~ ' 'B. G. Dick and A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 112, should be proportional to ( 7 - T c ) in the cubic 90 (1958). phase, and should reach a n abnormally low value 3J. E . Hanlon and A. W. Lawson, Phys. Rev. 113, 472 (1959). estimated as u = 2 o r 3 x 10" cps just before the 4W.Cochran, Phil. Mag. (to be published). first transition. This frequency should split ap'Woods, Cochran, and Brockhouse, Bull. A m . Phys. preciably in the tetragonal phase, and each f r e Sac. &, 246 (1959). quency in this phase should vary inversely as 'W. Cochran, Phys. Rev. Letters 2, 495 (1959). the square root of the corresponding "clamped" 'Lyddane, Sachs, and Teller, Phys. Rev. g,673 dielectric constant. Although relaxation of the (1941). *A. F. Devonshire, Advances i n Physics, edited by dielectric constant of barium titanate has been N . F. Mott (Taylor and Francis, LM., London, 1954), reported for frequencies of the order 10" cps, Vol. 3, p. 85. Benedict and Durand" found that when a single 'Shirane, Danner, and Pepinsky, Phys. Rev. 105, crystal i s used, the dielectric constant of the 856 (1957). cubic phase i s the s am e as the static value up to 'OShirane, Pepinsky, and Frazer, Phys. Rev. 91, u = 2 . 4 x 10" cps, the limit of their experiment. 1179 (1955). The resonance frequency predicted h e r e lies in "J. T. Last, Phys. Rev. 105, 1740 (1957). the millimeter wavelength range. A study of the '*T.S. Benedict and J. L. Durand, Phys. Rev. 109, 1091 (1958). properties of barium titanate in this difficult fre-
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
3 Ferroelectrics 1966-2001 : An Overview R. Blinc
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
3 Ferroeledrics 1966-2001 : An Overview R. Blinc J. Stefan Institute, Ljubbana, Slovenia
The number of publications and scientific meetings in the field of ferroelectricity has been increasing exponentially in the last 30 years. In addition to the classical fields of phase transitions and critical phenomena four new sub fields have emerged: a)ferroelectric liquid crystals. b) thinfilms and integrated ferroelectrics which led to the discovery of 2 D ferroelectricity and the development of non-volatile ferroelectric random access memory, c) dipolarglassesand relaxors as well as d) incommensurate systems. Quantum effects have been observed as well. Keywords: Ferroelectricity, Liquid Crystals, Thin Films, Dipolar Glasses, Relaxors, Incommensurate Systems, Critical Phenomena
3.1 Introduction
In this review ofthe development ofthe field of ferroelectric research in the period 19662001 1 shall deal with two main points: Statistical indicators measuring the quantitative growth of this field in the last 30 years
Breakthroughs that have been achieved in the understanding of this field and the new physics and new fields that have emerged. In this connection one should mention that in addition to the classical fields of soft modes, phase transitions and criticalphenomena a number of new fields are being studied at present: The traditional wisdom was that ferroelectricity like ferromagnetism can occur only in the crystalline solid state. In contrast ferroelectricity and antijirroelectricity have been shown to occur in liquid crystals and liquid crystalline polymers as well. This gave rise to an active new research field with many applications. The miniaturization requirements of nanoengineering forferroelectric memories with high information density have reopened the question how the ferroelectric propcrtics of a system are changed if the dimensions reach the nanometer region. The old question of how many unit cells are necessary so that ferroelectricity which is a collective phenomenon, does not disappear, thus became important not only for physics but also for technology.
106
I
3 Ferroelectrics 79662007:An Overview
These investigations led to the discovery of two-dimensional (2D) ferroelectricity in polymeric thinfilms as well as to the construction of non-volatile ferroelectric random access (NV-FRAM) memories and the emergence of the field of integrated ferroelect rics. Other mayor developments are in a periodic and disordered systems:
subclass of ferroelectrics, namely relaxors which similarly as glasses exhibit no symmetry breaking phase transition but where a ferroelectric state can be easily induced by an electric field E > EL. Relaxors exhibit giant electrostrictive and dielectric coupling and a huge dispersion of dielectric properties and are rather important for electromechanical applications.
/ncommensurate ferroelectrics, where the Whereas the leading idea of the Prague periodicity of the modulation wave and meeting was the soft mode instability and the periodicity of the basic lattice cannot the fact that many properties of ferroelectric be expressed as a ratio of two rational phase transitions can be described within numbers so there is no translational pe- the framework of lattice dynamics, the asriodicity in spite of perfect long range or- pects discussed in Madrid are much more der, allowed for the study of phasons, diverse. Though phase transitions physics is still a hot topic, newly emerging fields and amplitudons and solitons. Substitutionally disordered random solid applications are catching an increasing solutions of ferroelectric and antiferro- amount of interest [I]. electric systems were found to lead to a new state, the dipolar glass phase, where the low temperature state may be charac- 3.2 terized by an order parameter function Statistical Indicators instead of a single order parameter. If we have in addition to substitutional The number of publications in the field of disorder and competing interactions also ferroelectrics has in the last 30 years incharge disorder such as in perovskite solid creased exponentially (Figure 3.1). Accordsolutions we obtain another important ing to the data-base of the Institute of Sci-
in the field of 1970 and 2001.
3.2 Statistical indicators - R. Blinc
entific Information in Philadelphia, USA (which goes back to 1970) this number has increased from 200 on file in 1970 to about 20000 in 2001. I n the eighties and nineties a number of new-subfields have emerged
such an incommensurate systems, dipolar glasses, relaxors and ferroelectric liquid crystals. In the last period the growth was particularly visible in applied fields such as integrated ferroelectrics and thin films.
Table 3.1 Meetings on ferroelectricity.
/S/F ( 1 titernational Symposium on Integrated Ferroelectrics):
lSAF
(Intcrnational Symposium on Applied Ferroelectrics): 1" 1971 New York, USA; 2"" 1975 New Mexico, USA; 3'" 1979 Minnesota, U S A 4"' 1983 Maryland, USA; 5'" 1986 Pennsylvania, USA; 6"' 1988 Zurich, Switzerland; 7''' 1990 Illinois, USA; 8'" 1992 South Carolina, USA: 9'" 1994 Pennsylvania, USA; 10'" 1996 Brunswick, N J , USA; 11 "' 1998 Montreux, Switzerland; 12 "I 2000 Honolulu, USA.
1" 1989 Colorado, USA; 2'Id 1990 Monterey, USA; 3Id 1991 Colorado, USA; 4'"1992 Monterey, USA; 5'" 1993 Colorado, USA;
6'" 1994 Montcrey, USA; 7'" 1995 Colorado, USA; 8'"1996 Tempe, USA; 9"' 1997 New Mexico, USA; 10"' 1998 Monterey, USA; 11'I' 1999 Colorado, USA: 12 111 2000 Aachen, Germany; 13 'I' 2001 Colorado. USA. /MF
EMF
(International Meeting on Ferroelectricity):
(European Meeting on Ferroelectricity): 1" 1969 Saarbriicken, Germany; 2""1971 Dijon, France; 3'd 1975 Zurich, Switzerland; 4j" 1979 Portoroi, Slovenia; 5"' 1983 Milaga, Spain; 6'" 1987 Poznan, Poland; 7'" 1991 Dijon, France; 8''' 1995 Nijmegen, Netherlands; 9"' 1999 Prague, Czech Republic.
1" 1966 Prague. Czechoslovakia; 2""1969 Kyoto, Japan; 3"l 1973 Edinburgh, UK; 4'" 1977 Leningtad, USSR; 5'" 1981 Pcnnsylvania, USA; 6'" 1985 Kobc, Japan; 7"' 1989 Saarbriicken, Germany; 8'"1993 Maryland, USA; 9"' 1997 Seoul. Korea; 10"'2001 Madrid, Spain. FLC
(Intcrnational Symposium Crystals) :
ECAPD 011 Ferroelectric
1" 1987 Bordeaux, France; 2"' 1989 Gotcborg. Swcdcn; 3"' 1991 Colorado, USA; 4'" 1993 Tokyo, japan; 5'" 1995 Cambridge, UK; 6"' 1997 Brest, France; 7'" 1999 Dartnstadt, Gerniany; 8''' 2001 Washington, USA.
Liquid
(European Corifcrcnce on Applications of Polar Dielectrics): 1" 1988 Zurich, Switzerland; 2"" 1992 London, UK; 3'" 1996 Bled, Slovenia: 4I'' 1998 Montreux, Switzerland; S'"2000 Jurmah, Latvia.
108
I
3 Ferroelectrics 196&2001: An Overview
Whereas the I M F in Prague in 1966 was The form of the singularity of thermodythe first conference of its kind, there are at namic quantities at the phase transition present at least seven kinds of conferences point in uniaxial ferroelectries with direcdevoted to various aspects of ferroelectric tion dependent interactions has been deterresearch: International Meetings on Ferro- mined [Sl]. In view of long range dipolar electricity (IMF) from 1966, European Meet- fields the results differ from the phenoings on Ferroelectricity (EMF) from 1969, menological theory by logarithmic correcInternational Symposia on Applied Ferro- tions, 1nlT- TJ. The influence of quenched electrics (ISAF) from 1971, European Con- local randomfields (RF) on phase transitions ferences on Applications of Polar Dielectrics has been investigated by Imry and Ma [52]. (ECAPD) from 1988, International Symposia on Ferroelectric Liquid Crystals (FLC) Table 3.2 Major developments in phase transitions from 1987, International Symposia on In- and critical phenomena. tegrated Ferroelectrics (ISIF)from 1989 and 1937-1971: Exact solutions of six vertex spin Asian conferences on Ferroelectricity. One model in a field (Lieb) and eight vertex model should also not forget the successful series in zero field (Sutherland, Fan and Wo). of Electroceramics conferences. The places 1968-1974: Improper ferroelectrics like and dates of the conferences held so far are gadolinium molybdate where P i s not the primary order parameter (Indenbom, Levanyuk, collected in the Table 3.1. Sannikov, Dvorak, Pytte, Aizu).
1975:Influence of quenched local random 3.3 Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena
In this classical field of ferroelectric research there have been so many important advances and discoveries in the last 30 years that only a few can be mentioned. The Landau theory of the dielectric anomalies in improper ferroelectrics like gadolinium molybdate, where the phase transition order parameter is not the polarization, has been worked out by Levanyuk and Sannikov [45].These systems where the lattice instability does not occur at the center of the Brillouin zone were predicted by Indenbom [46] and investigated independently also by Dvorak [47],Pytte [48]and Aizu 1491, The understanding of the influence of defects on the anomalies near phase transitions has been another important development [SO]. It has been shown that defects provoke anomalies similar to those due to critical fluctuations.
fields on phase transitions (Imry, Ma), 11. Order phase transition destroyed by RF in Heisenberg, XY and other systems with continuous symmetry for any D and Ising systems for D < 3.
1988: Influence of defects on anomalies near phase transtions (Levanyuk, Sigov) provoke anomalies similar to critical phenomena. 1970-1994 Effects of hydrostatic pressure (Samara, Peercy, Nelmes) on FE phasc transition. Effects of uniaxial pressure (Gonzalo).
1987:Microscopic understanding of FE phase transitions & oxygen polarizability (Biltz, Benedek, Bussmann-Holder).
1980:Quantum paraelectrics K,.,Li,TaO
,,
Sr,-,Nb,TiO, and quantum fluctuations in zero dimensional H-bond systems (K,H(S04),: T, = 100 K) and deuteron glasses.
1980: Development of new techniques (2D NMR, EPR, ENDOR, NQR) for local structure of ferroelectrics (Miller, Borsa, Rigamonti, Dalal, Blinc. Seliger. Michel).
1990-2001: Developments in I R spectroscopy (Volkov, Kozlov, Petzelt, Grigas) & HyperRaman spectroscopy (Vogt) of FE and FE thin films.
3.3 Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena - R. Blinc
They showed that a second order phase transition will be destroyed by arbitrarily weak RF in all Heisenberg, X-Y or other systems with a continuous order parameter symmetry and in king systems for d < 3. The experimental situation was reviewed by W. Kleemann [53]. The search for static and dynamic critical exponents of ferroelectric phase transitions was started by the suggestion of Elliot [54] that pseudo-spin models may give a good indications of the critical behavior to be expected close to T,by exploiting the analogies with the king model. A huge amount of data has collected so far. The study of the effects of hydrostatic pressure on ferroelectric phase transitions has given many new insights into transition mechanisms and was pioneered by the work of Samara [55,56].Uniaxial pressure effects were also studied by a number of groups (see, for instance Ref. [57]). The use of synchrotron radiation and high j u x nuclear reactors has led to a much more precise determination of the structural changes at ferroelectric phase transitions as well as phonon instabilities (See, for instance the papers [%]). One should also mention the developments in infrared soft mode spectroscopy (A. A. Volkov, G. V. Kozlov, J . Petzelt) which was recently applied also to thin films [59].There have been many advances as well in Raman and hyper-Raman spectroscopy [60].Microcave dielectric spectroscopy measurements in particular have shown a cross-over from displacive to order-disorder behavior on approaching T, in SbSI and other systems [61]. A significant contribution to a better understanding of phase transition mechanism has been also provided by local techniques such as N M R and N Q R as well as EPR and E N D O R . (For review see Ref. [62,63])Here one should mention the I7O NQR studies of H-bonded ferroelectries which allowed
I
and accurate determination of the proton and deuteron freeze-out in the double well 0 - H - 0 potentials and the use of the isotropic part of the chemical shift tensor for the study of the order-disorder vs. displacive character of phase transitions by N. S. Dalal [64] (Figure 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4), the ENDOR studies of the local phase transitions near paramagnetic defects of the same author, the work of Bonera, Borsa and Rigamonti on perovskite transitions, the work of D. Michel on betaines and the EPR work on critical phenomena in SrTiO, and other perovskites as well as H-bonded ferroelectries by K. A. Miiller. One should also note the observation of the dynamic symmetry breaking in KSCN and RbSCN antiferroelectrics by ’“K and X7RbN M R [65]. A special contribution to the field of quantum efects in ferroelectrics is the observation of incoherent deuteron tunneling in Rb,_,(ND4),D2P04 deuteron glasses at low temperatures by 2D deuteron exchange N M R as well as by deuteron and Rb T, measurements [66]. The deuteron and Rb relaxation peaks change from a thermally activated regime to a temperature-independent 0-D-0 deuteron tunneling regime at low temperature (Figure 3.5). Another important contribution is connected with quantum efects in “zero-dimensional” systems like K3H(S04)2 and Rb,H(SO,), where the hydrogens are disordered in double minimum potentials [67, 681. Whereas the deuterated crystals undergo an antiferroelectric phase transition, protonated analogues remain paraelectric down to the lowest temperatures investigated. N M R and IR measurements [69]have shown that this is not due to the geometrical isotope effect i.e. the fact that the proton moves to the center of the H-bond. The absence ofa phase transition in the protonated isomorphs is thus due to zero point quantum fluctuations or a tunneling splitting
109
110
I
3 Ferroelectrics 19GGZOal: An Overview I
1'11
Lo
-I 138
T(K:
148
0.6 0.5
lo
4
3
I28
0.4
T(K)
148
138
Figure 3.2 Low resolution NQR data showing order-disorder features for RbH2P0,.
b VL =
c IBb cp = $ (0. Bo) = 25"
B 5 w
109.3 MHZ
20O-
-20; -40 43-
I
1
I
1
I
. . _._..-._.-- ....
-
191.0
Ia
190.8
-
190.7
-
0
f
50% o f the maximum expected polarization is achieved in all films.
The low temperature second order phase transition at T, 2 20 "C in P(VDF-TrFE) filrns of 30 monolayers or less can be described as a surface layer transition controlled by the interaction with the substrate or the top electrode.
3.5.4 Freely Suspended Ferroelectric Smectic Thin Films
Freely suspended smectic films represent an ideal, defect free system where the crossover from the 3D to the 2D X-Y universality class can be studied as the number N of smectic layers decreases (Figure 3.17). The interior layers are still Sm A-like, whereas the two surface layers already show
'*O
I
3 Ferroelectrics 19662001: An Overview
I
OETE*
Srn C* like +
I
YEW FRAME
Sm A like -+
Sm C* likc +-
Figure 3.17 Free standing smectic film
Figure 3.18 Smectic layers in a free standing tenlayer film above the bulk transition temperature. The interior layers are still Sm A like, whereas the two surface layers already show a finite polarization, characteristic for the Sm C* phase.
a finite tilt and finite polarization character- ers. This phenomenon is similar to surfaceistic for the ferroelectric Sm C" phase (Fig induced ferromagnetism in thin ferroure 3.18). Ferroelectricity is here surface in- magnetic films. duced like in PZT. It is interesting to note that in the bulk The temperature dependence of the tilt the Sm A - Sm C" phase transition is of 1'' angle for different numbers of layers from order, whereas it is of second order in the N = 2 to N = 10 are shown in Figure 3.19 N = 2 layer system. By decreasing the film together with the bulk results [18].The two thickness, the conjugate field penetrates exterior layers undergo a phase transition deep enough into the sample to drive the into the ferroelectric state at much higher phase transition close to the critical point temperatures than the interior bulk-likelay- similarly as in the ( Ec, T,) case.
Figure 3.19 The temperature dependence o f the tilt angle (which is proportional to the spontaneous polarizations) for different numbers of layers o f freely suspended ferroelectric liquid crystal DOBAMBC. The solid curves are fits to a discrete mean field theory [18].
3.6 Dipolar Classes and Relaxon - R. Blinc
competing FE and AFE interactions and random fields lead to a random freeze-out of the deuterons into one of the two possible In contrast to ferroelectrics, dipolar glasses sites in the 0 - D - - 0 bonds (Figure 3.21) and relaxors show no macroscopic space [19,20].These systems may provide a congroup symmetry brealung at any tempera- ceptual link between spin glasses where ture. The key feature of all dipolar glasses at least for king systems - an equilibrium and relaxors is a “rough” energy landscape phase transition is believed to exist and in order parameter or phase space (Figure structural glasses where the situation is less 3.20). This is rather different from the clear. In contrast with magnetic spin glasses smooth single or two-valley type free energy where we deal with random bond type insurface of homogeneous ferroelectrics. To teractions, proton and deuteron glasses are what extent can this picture and the prob- characterized by random bonds and random lem of the nature of the glass transition be fields. The king random bond - random put into a quantitative statistical-mechanics field (RBRF) model for these systems was description is one of the great open prob- proposed in 1987 [21]. Since the variance of lems of condensed matter physics. Whereas the random field A acts as an effective orit is clear that in these multi-relaxational dering field, the corresponding Edwardssystems a dynamic transition takes place Anderson order parameter qEA should be characterized by a near freezing-out of the non-zero at all temperatures. There is howlongest relaxation time and a splitting be- ever still a “glass” transition into a “nontween the field cooled and zero field cooled ergodic” DG phase at the Almeida-Thouless linear dielectric susceptibilities, the exist- (A‘I) line TdA) due to replica symmetry ence of an equilibrium glass transition has breaking [22]. not yet been definitely established. This is The basic problem in deuteron glasses is so in spite of the near divergence of the non- how to measure the Edwards-Anderson linear susceptibility which however shifts order parameter qEA as there is no macroand tends to disappear with decreasing fre- scopic conjugate field attached to it. The quency. answer is provided by local techniques such One of the most active fields have been as NMR, NQR and EPR. The first experiproton and deuteron (DG) glasses, i.e. mixed mental determination of qEA(T) in D U D P solid solutions of FE and AFE crystals such by N M R has been reported in 1989 (Figure as Rb,-, (ND,), D,PO, (DRADP) where 3.22) [23]. 3.6 Dipolar Glasses and Relaxors
Homogeneous ferroelectric
Ft
FA
-P
L
P
(PA Deuteron pseudospin glass
Figure 3.20 Free energy surface in a homogeneous ferroelectric and a deuteron pseudospin glass.
I
I
122 3 Ferroeledn‘cs 19662001:An Overview
0
0.2 xpe
0.4
I
0.6
X-
0.8
I
Figure 3.21 Phase diagram of the ferroelectric solid solution Rb,,(ND4),D2P04.
Table 3.7 Some developments in dipolar glasses
and relaxors.
1954 Systems with diffuse phase transitions (Smolenski, Isupov). 1970:Relaxors (Smolenski). 1982-1984: Proton glasses (Courtens, Schmidt).
1987:Random bond - random field Ising model of proton and deuteron. 1989: First direct measurement of Edwards Anderson order parameter and local polarization distribution function in D-RADP. 56 (Blinc,Zalar, Pirc). 1991:Field-cooledand zero field cooled susceptibility in deuteron glasses (Levstik, Filipic, Kutnajk, Pirc). 1992 Dielectric non-linearities in relaxors (Colla, Levstik, Tagantsev, Glazounov). 1992 Random field induced domain states of relaxors PMN (Westphal, Kleemann, Clinch&, Tagantsev, Glazounov). 1998 Morphotropic phase boundary theory of giant susceptibility and electromechanical response (Ishibashi). 1999 Spherical random bond-random field model of relaxors (Pirc, Blinc). Determination of Edwards-Andersonorder parameter and local polarization distribution functions of relaxors (Zdar, Blinc, Pirc). 2001: Determination of the intermediate
monodinic phase at the morphotropic phase boundary in PZT (Noheda, Shirane).
-1.5
-1
a:,
op
05
I
IS
Figure 3.22 (a) Temperature dependence of q,, as determined from the second moment of the ”Rb % + - % N M R spectra in Rbo55(ND4)044D2P04. The dotted line represents the fit to the random bond-random field model with A/J2 = 0.35, Tg= J/K = 90 K, whereas the dashed line represents the best fit for the pure random field model where Jg = 0 K and A1I2/k = 68 K. The solid line represents the fit to the pure random bond model with Jg = 151 K and A?\”2/k= 0 K. (b) Temperature dependence of the local polarization distribution function W(p) for Rbo56(ND4)044D2P04where A/J2= 0.35 [23].
The measured qEA(Tj curve shows that the king RBRF model gives the best fit to the N M R experimental data and allows for a determination of the random bond and random field variances. In the same publication the first measurement of the local polarization distribution function w(~) for DRADP has been reported (Figure 3.22). The situation is quite different in perovskite relaxors, i.e. in perovskite solid solutions like PbMgl,3Nb,,,03 (PMN) with substitutional and charge disorder [24].
3.6 Dipolar Classes and Relaxors - R. Blinc
Whereas the two position 0-D-0hydrogen bonds represent the basic reorientable dipoles in deuteron glasses, the basic ingredient of relaxors are locally ferroelectric polar nanodomains [25] which vary in size and orientation nearly continuously. In contrast to dipolar glasses a ferroelectricphase can be induced in relaxors with relatively modest electric fields E > E,, resulting in a giant, frequency dependent, dielectric anomaly and huge electromechanical coupling. To describe this situation, the spherical random bond - random field (SRBRF) model has been introduced where the pseudo-spin is proportional to the polar cluster dipole moment (Figure 3.23) [26,27].The order parameter field jj = (3) is here quasi-continuous and not discrete as in deuteron glasses. This model properly describes the N M R lineshapes (Figure 3.24) and the local polarization distribution function W(jj)as well the temperature dependence of the EdwardsAnderson order parameter [28] (Figure 3.25) and the dielectric non-linearity [29]. Dielectric non-linearities in relaxors have been investigated by a number of groups and a large difference between the “ac”and “dc” effects has been found (See,for instance Ref. [30]).A dynamic SRBRF model was pro-
s
posed [31] in 2001. The coupling between polar nanodomains has been suggested to be mediated by soft TO phonon modes [32]. Whereas in perovskite type relaxors random bonds dominate random fields (similarly as in dipolar glasses), the opposite is true in uniaxial SBN-type relaxors which can be described by the random king model [33,34]. The importance of random fields is also seen in polarization switching experiments in PMN - PT [35]where the AVRAMI equation fails for the long time tails. For E > E, the polarization takes 8 decades of time to saturate demonstrating the extremely broad relaxation time distribution (see also Ref. [30,36]). Finally one should mention that the theory of the giant dielectric and electromechanical response near the morphotropic phase boundary, which is important for all piezo-electric transducers and other applications of relaxors has been worked out by Ishibashi [37]. Whereas the morphotropic phase boundary was previously regarded as the boundary separating the rhombohedra1 and tetragonal regions of the PZT phase diagram it has been recently established that this boundary corresponds in fact to the nearly vertical line separating the rhombo-
Figure 3.23 Schematic phase diagram of relaxors according to the SRBRF model. The temperature dependence of the Edwards-Anderson glass order parameter 9 is as well shown for various values of the random field variance A.
I
123
124
I
3 Ferroelectrics 19662001: An Overview
Quadratic c a s e
Linear case
T = 400 K
I
-400
200
-200
400
-400
'
-200
I
.
0
I
'
200
400
V - V ~( k H z )
V - V ~( k H Z )
Figure 3.24 "Nb X -+ -% NMR lineshapes in a PMN single crystal for different orientations of the external field with respect to the crystal axes. Both the linear case where the NMR resonance frequency is a linear function of the local polarization and the quadratic case where the orientation is such that the linear term is absent and the NMR resonance frequency is quadratic in the local polarization, are shown. Note characteristic singularity and asymmetry lineshape in the quadratic case.
300
SRBRF model
200 N= A
f " 100-
0 -5,O
-2.5
0.0
2,5
5.0
0
P.
100
200 300 T (K)
400
Figure 3.25 Local polarization distribution function W&) and temperature dependence of the Edwards-Andersonorder parameter derived from 93NbNMR in PMN. The solid line shows the theoretical fit for the SRBRF model.
hedral and monoclinic phases for 0.46 I x < 0.51 (Figure 3.26). The applicationof an electricfield induces the rotation ofthe polar axis and monoclinic
distortions which are the origin of the high piezo-electric response [38]. The pressuretemperature phase diagram of relaxors has been determined by Samara [39].
3 7 Incommensurate (IC) Systems - R. Blinc
a)
b)
PbZr,UTi,O,
IUlX
0
Figure 3.26 (a) The p,/p,-dependences of the dielectric susceptibilities. The ordinate shows la1 x but not x itself. The inset shows the corresponding phase diagram where C, T, and R indicate cubic, tetragonal and rhombohedra1 phases, respectively [37] (b) New PZT phase diagram arround the morphotropic phase boundary 1381
3.7
Table 3.8 Major developments in incommensurate
Incommensurate (IC) Systems
systems.
IC systems represent a class of materials where the spontaneous polarization varies in space, P = P(r) with a periodicity which is incommensurate to that of the basic lattice. Though the incommensurate (IC) phase in NaNO, - existing over 1.5 "C -has been discovered already in 1961by Tanaisaki and the intermediate IC phase in thiourea was found in 1963by Futama and Chiba the rapid growth of this field started in 1977 by the discovery of the IC structure of K,Se04 and the study of its IC dynamics in 1980 by Axe, Shirane and Iizumi 140, 411. The use of superspace groups for the description of IC phases has been introduced by Janner and Janssen in 1976 [42].Between 1977 and 1980 the Landau theory for IC systems was developed by Levanyuk, Dvorak, Ishibashi, Bruce and Cowley and ANNNI spin models were proposed by Selke and Siems. The local structure of IC phases has been illu-
1961:Discovery of intermediate IC phase in NaNO, over 1.5 OC (Tanaisaki, Phenomenological theory by Gesi). 1970:Discovery of IC phases in thiourea (Chiba). 1976: Superspace description of IC phases (Janner,Jansen, de Wolf). 1977 Discovery and IC dynamics in K,SeO, (Axe, Shirane, Iizumi). 1977-1980 landau theory of IC phases (Levanyuk, Dvorak, Ishibashi, Bruce, Cowley). 1997-1980 Many experimental findings by NMR. NQR, EPR (Blinc, Peterson, Milia, Aleksandrova) and neutron scattering (Currat, Quilichini, Dolino). 1982:Discovery of explanation of 3q IC phase in quartz (Aslanyan, Levanyuk, Dolino). 1985: Discovery of quasy-crystals (Schechtman). 1990 IC phase in high T, superconductor. 1998 39 solitons discovered in proustite (Apih et al.).
I
125
I minated by NMR, NQR ( B h cet al., Peters-
126 3 Ferroelectrics 79662001:An Overview
YAMUMOTO,T., Integr. Ferroelectrics 1996,12, 161. T., AHN,C. H., TRISCONE, J. M., Appl. 12 TYBELL, Phys. Lett. 1999,75,856. M., HARNAGEQ C., ERFURTH,W., 13 ALEXE, V., Appl. Phys. 2000, HESSE,D., GOESDE, A 70,1. 14 ISHIKAWA,K., YOSHIKAWA,R., OKADA,N., Phys. Rev. 1988,837,5852. M., MAKINO,Y., Ferroel. Lett. 1998, 15 TANAKA, 24,13. 16 SCOTT,J.F., Ferroelectric Memories, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999. 17 Scorn, I. F., Ferroelectrics 2000, 236,247. i a HEINEKAMP, S., PELCOVITS, R. A., FONTES,E., YI,E.. CHEN,PINDAK,R., MEYER, R. B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984,52, 1017. 19 COURTENS, E., ]. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 1982,43, V. H., et al., Phys. Rev. 1984, L199 ; SCHMIDT, 830, 2795. 20 SCHMIDT, V. H.,et d., Phys. Rev. 1984,830, 2795. B., BLINC,R., Phys. Rev. 1987, 21 PIRC,R., TADI/~; 836,8607. 22 LEVSTIK,A., FILIPIE, C., KUTNJAK, 2.. LEVSTIK, References I., PIRC,R., T A D I8~.. BLINC, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991,66,2368. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1959,3,412. J., PIRC,R., TAD14 B., 23 BLINC,R.,DOLINSEK, 1 COCHRAN, B., KIND, R., LIECHTI, O., Phys. Rev. 2 MEYER,R. B., LIEBERT, L., KELLER, P., ]. de Phys. Lett. 1975,36, L69. Lett. 1989,63,2248. 3 CIARK,N. A., LAGERWALL,S. T., Appl. Phys. 24 SMOLENSKI, G.A.,]. Phys.Soc.]ap. 1970,28, 26. Lett. 1980,36,899. 4 CHANDANI, A. D. L., GORECKO, E., OUCHI, Y., 25 CROSS,L. E., Ferroelectrics 1987,76,241; ibidem 1994,15,305. TAKEZOE, H., FUKUDA, A.. rap. J. Appl. Phys. 26 BLINC,R., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999,83,424. 1989,28, L1261. 27 PIRC,R.,BLINC,R., Phys. Rev. 1999, 5 MUSEVIE,I., BLINC,R., ~ E K S B., , FILIPIE,C., EOPIE,M., SEPPEN, A,, WYDER, P.,LEVANYUK, 860,13470. A,, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988,60,1530. 28 BLINC,R., et al., Phys. Rev. 2000,861,253. I., BLINC,R., OEKS, B., The Physics of 29 KUTNJAK, Z., et d.,Phys. Rev. 1999,B59,294. 6 MUSEVI~, Ferroelectric and Antferroelectric Liquid Crystals, 30 TAGANTSEV, A. K., GLAZOUNOV, A. E., J. of the Korean Phys. SOC.1998,32,951. World Scientific 2000. c., V., Phys. Rev. 31 PIRC,R.,BLINC,R., BOBNAQ 7 LEHMANN,w., S K U P I N , H., TOLKSDORF, 2001,863,054203. GEBHARD, E., ZENTEL, R., KRWGEQ P., LOSCHE,M., KREMER,F., Nature 2001,410, P.M., PARK,S. E., SHIRANE, G., 32 GEHRING, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000,84, 5216. 447. B. D., Sol. State 33 KLEEMAN,W., et al., in Fundamental Physics a BATRA,I. P., SILVERMAN, ofFerroekctrics 2000 (Ed. COHEN,R. E.), Cornrnun. 1971,11,291:TILLEY, D. R., OEKS, AIP Conf. Proc. 2000,535,26. B., Sol. State Cornrnun. 1984,49,823. 34 KLEEMAN,W., Phase Trans. 1998,65, 141. 9 TILLEY, D. R.,OEKS, B., Sol. State Commun. D.,private communication. 35 VIEHIAND, 1984,49,823. 10 BUNE,A. v., FRIDKIN, v. M..DUCHARME, s., 36 WESTPHAL, v., KLEEMAN,w., GLINCHUK, M. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992,68,847. BLINOV, L. M., PALTO,S. P., SOROKIN, A. V., 37 ISHIBASHI,Y.,IWATA,M.,]pn.]. Appl. Phys. YUDIN, S. G., ZLATKIN, A., Nature 1998,391, 1998.37.L985; 1999,38,1454. 874.
son et al., Milia et al., Alexandrova et al.) and neutron scattering (Currat, Quilichini, Dolino).Systems with one (lq),two (2q)and three (3q) independent modulation waves were observed.The modulation waves were found to be either of the plane-wave type or were soliton-like. Phason and amplitudon modes were observed in the plane wave regime both by NMR and NQR as well as by neutron scattering. (For references see Ref. [43]) 3q-type solitons were found by "As NQR in proustite [44] together with a lq-3q transition. In 1985 a new family of IC structures namely quasicrystals were observed by Shechtman et al. In 1990 the IC phase in high T, superconductors was found.
11
References - R. Blinc
Cox,D. E., SHIRANE, G.,Guo, R.. JONES, B.. CROSS,L. E., Phys. Rev. 2001,
38 NOHEDA, B.,
39 40 41 42 43
44 45 46 47
48 49 50
51 52 53
54
55
56 57
58
863, 2501. SAMARA, G. A,, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 314; 59 see also Phys. Rev. 2001, B61, 3889. 60 IIZUMI, M., AXE, J. D., SHIRANE, G., SHIMAOKA, K.. Phys. Rev. 1977, 815,4392. AXE,J. D., IIZUMI, M., SHIRANE, G.,Phys. Rev. 61 1980, 822, 3408. J A N N E R , A,, J A N S S E N , T., Phys. Rev. 1977, 815, 62 643. Incommensurate Phases in Dielectrics, Vol. I and 11, Elscvicr Science Publishers, 1986 (edited by BLINC, R., LEVANYUK,A. P.). 63 APIH,T., ct al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 2225. LFVANYUK,A. P., SANNIKOV, D. G., ETF 1968, 55, 256. 64 INDENBOM, V. L., Kristallograjiya 1960, 5, 115. DVORAK,V., Ferroelectrics 1974, 7, 1; Phys. Stat. 65 Sol. (b) 1971, 45, 147. 66 PYITE,E., Solid State Commun. 1970, 8, 2101. AIZU,K., J. Phys. Sac. Jap. 1970, 28, 717. LEVANYUK,A. P., SIGOV, A. S., Defects and 67 Structural Phase Transitions, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988. 68 LARKIN. A. I., KHMELNITSKII, D. E., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. (.ETF) 1969, 56, 2087. 69 IMRY, I., MA, S. K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1975,35,1399. KLEEMANN,W., et al., Int. J. ofMod. Phys. 70 1993, 7, 2469. 71 ELLIOT,R. J., I N STRUCTURAL PHASETKANSITIONS 72 A N D SOFTMODES,EDITORS SAMUELSEN, E. J., ANDERSEN,E., FEDER,J., Universitetsforslaget, 73 Oslo, 1971. 74 SAMARA, G.A,, J. Phys. SOC.Jap. 1970, 28, Suppl. 399. 75 PEEREY, P. S., SAMARA, G. A,, Phys. Rev. 1972, 86, 2748. 76 KORALEWSKI,M., NOHEDA, B., GLESIAS,T., GONZALO, J. A., Phase Transitions 1994, 47, 77.
.
I
127
NELMES,R. J., E.G. LOCKWOOD, D. J., OHNO, N., NELMES, R. J., AREND,H.,Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 1983, 24, Suppl. 24-2, p. 510). PETZELT, J., OSTAPCHUK, T., Ferroelectrics 2001, 249, 81. VOGT. H., Jap.J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 24, Suppl. 24-2, p. 112. GRIGAS, J., et d.,Jap.J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 24, Suppl. 24-2, p. 525. BLINC, R., in Magnetic Resoname ofphase Transtions (Eds. OWENS, F. J., POOLE, C. P., FARACH,H. A.), Academic Press, London, 1979. Local Properties at Phase Transitions (Ed. MULLER,K. A.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976. DALAL,N. S., KLYMACHYOV,A., BUSSMANNHOLDER, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 5924. BLINC, R., et al., Phys. Rev. 1991, 843, 569. DOLINSEK, J., AREON,D.. LIAR, B., PIRC,R., BLINC,R., KIND,R., Phys. Rev. 1996, 854, R6811. GESI,R., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 48, 886; 1981, 50. 3185. NODA,Y., KASATANI, H., WATANABE, Y., TERAUCHI, H., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 61, 905. MIKAC,U., et al., Phys. Rev. 1999, B59, 11293; Phys. Rev. 2000, B61, 197. SIATER,J., J. Chern. Phys. 1941, 9, 16. LIEB,E. H., Phys. Rev. 1967, 162, 162; Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1046; 1967, 19, 108. SUTHERLAND, B., J. Math. Phys. 1970, 1 1 , 3183. FAN,C., Wu, F. Y., Phys. Rev. 1970, 82, 723. BAX~ER, R. J., Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, London, 1982. KIND, R., BLINC,R., LIAR, B., et al., to be published. BILZ, H., BENEDEK,G.,BUSSMANN-HOLDER, A., Phys. Rev. 1987, B354840; ibid. 1989, 839, 9214.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics V. L. Cinzburg
Ferroelectricity: % Fundamentals Collection. Edited by JulioA. Gonzalo and Basilio Jimknez Copyright 0 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 3-527-40486.4
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical and Other Remarks’) V. 1. Cinzburg P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Acad. Sci., Moscow, Russia
The talk is devoted to comments on the his- tion for the present conference. However, tory of creation of the theory of ferroelectric when invited to do this, I felt I wished to phenomena. It is primarily concerned with attend an International conference on ferrothe work of V. L. Ginzburg and other Rus- electricity at least once in my life. The point sian physicists in this field. The topics is that I first took interest in ferroelectric touched upon are: (i) application of the phenomena in 1945 and published a numLandau theory of phase transitions to ferro- ber of papers [2-71 on this subject, but not a electrics (ii) elaboration of the “soft mode” single time did I have an opportunity to parconcept (iii) relation between the ferro- ticipate in such conferences. And when inelectricity and the high-temperature super- vited to the 6th such conference held in conductivity (iv) determination of the lim- Kyoto (Japan) in 1985, I submitted a paper its of applicability of the Landau theory of [8]mainly devoted to my own works [2-71. phase transitions (v) revealing of special Such were the conditions of life and work cases of ferroelectricity: improper and in- for most physicists in the Soviet Union in commensurate ferroelectrics, ferrotoroics. the years of “cold war”. To somehow illustrate the conditions of our work, I shall 1. My talk is devoted to comments on the mention the following fact. There was such history of creation of the theory of ferro- a phrase in my paper [8]: “I cannot attend electric phenomena. I shall touch upon re- the present Meeting and most probably will sults, mostly of phenomenological nature, not be able to in future”. The editor of the which are now well-known and are eluci- Russian version discarded this phrase. I am dated in many books (I shall mention here happy to have lived to the downfall of the at least the excellent monograph by M. Lines Communist regime nearly 10 years ago. and A. Glass [l]).Therefore, the question Now people in Russia have freedom of immediately arises of why I have chosen speech and migration. I mention it because such a subject for the talk. Answering this the participants of the conference are mostly question, I shall note, first,that I myselfhave young people and they should not forget had no intention to offer any communica- about the conditions of life under totalitarian (Fascist or Communist) regime and, if 1J Report prepared for the 10‘’ International Meeting on Ferroelectricity (Madrid, Spain, September 3-7,2001). needed, should defend democracy.
132
I
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical and Other Remarks
I would like to note that I am against priority disputes and generally forwarding the questions of priority. Everything is clear in this sphere from corresponding publications, especially at the contemporary level of information exchange.That is why, mentioning some of my works in report [8] and below in this paper can only be justified by the fact that they were written rather long ago when Soviet physicist were unable to publish their works freely (suffice it to say that the Journal of Physics USSR stopped being published in 1947, and when it became practically impossible to publish papers in English during several years). I have no priority claims to anybody.2) It is time, however, to proceed to the subject matter (I shall make use of my paper [8], but repetitions are inevitable).
era1 and transparent. Clarity and generality were reached as a result of investigation of barium titanate (BaTiO,). In 1944 Wul and Goldman found [15] that barium titanate ceramics showed a high dielectric permitivity E which varied strongly with temperature and had a rather high maximum at T = 400 K. The polycrystalline nature of the samples and shortage of data veiled the fact that they were dealing with a new ferroelectric (paper [15]ends with a remark that the available “facts, as well as the composition and structure of barium titanate do not allow it to be included in the group of ferroelectrics”).However, I understood that BaTiO, is a ferroelectric [2] and applied the Landau theory [14,1G]to describe its behaviour; as the order parameter I chose electric polarisation P. It should be noted that the Landau theory of phase transitions is the mean (self-consistent)field theory, and in particularly simple cases it reduces to the Van-der-Waalsand other constructions that had been well-known for a long time. The power of the Landau theory rests on a consistent use of the symmetry laws and the automatism of its application.This was just reflected in paper [2],which was submitted for publication on July 31, 1945. In this paper, the thermodynamic potential (more precisely, its density) was written in the f01-m:))
2. The discovery of ferroelectricity on an example of Rochelle salt may, although rather conditionally,be referred to 1920 [9] (see [l]). Much was clarified [lo]within the decade to follow, but as far as I know, it was only in 1937 that Jaffe hypothesised the occurrence of phase transitions at Curie points (at 8, = 255 K and O2 = 297 K) in Rochelle salt [111. In the ferroelectricregion (i.e., at a temperature Tlying between 8, and e,) the crystal is monoclinic, and outside this region it is orthorhombic.Further, a phenomenologicaltheory of the behaviour 0 = @ , + a P 2 +P- P 4 + ~ P 6 - E P , (1) the Rochelle salt was developed in [12,13]. 2 G Since this salt is a complicated object and the general approach to the phase transition where E is the electric field strength and the theory, known as the Landau theory [14],was coefficients a,p, and y depend on the temnot used, papers [12, 131 were not very gen- perature T. 2)
the basis of some agreement on juridical collaboraUnfortunately,various statements are sometimes far tion with the USSR, the USA government used my from reality. That is why I permit myselfto note that testimony, with reference to paper (21, to reject the although the author of several hundred papers and a claim ofpayment for some patents exploiting BaTiO,. number of innovations, I have never applied for any patents. 1 shall recall the fact, mentioned also in [S], 3) To be absolutely precise, in [2] expression (1) with y = 0 was written down. Later, however, it was found that somewhere in the fifties I gave evidence in court necessary to add also the term 1p6 in case the tranintheUSSR,upontheorderfromthe USA,concemsition was close to the ticriticappoint Oh. ing use of piezoelectric barium titanate sensors. On
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical and Other Remarks - V. L. Cinzburg
The decomposition (1)is valid, generally speaking, only in the vicinity of the transition point 8; we mean second-order transitions or first-order transitions that are close to the tricritical point (this point was earlier termed the critical Curie point; at this point, i.e., at T = 8,, the coefficient p(e,,) is equal to zero). Far from the tricritical point 8,, in the case of a second-order transition one may put y = 0. In this case
>o T=8
and at T > 8 in equilibrium we have a paraelectric phase (i.e., P(T) = 0), while at T c 0 spontaneous polarization occurs and
The jump of the specific heat is (4)
Taking into account that in equilibrium
a@ - = 0 , we obtain E = 2 a P + 2 p P‘.In a dP E - 1 weak field we have P = Po + -E and, 411
accordingly, 2x a(T)=-,T>0; E - 1
a(T)= --,
II
E - 1
T i 0.
(5)
Here in E(‘T) a certain term c0 not connected with the transition is in fact neglected; assuming also that E >> 1,by virtue of (2) we obtain
E(T)= -
II
aQ(0 - T )
,T e) = 2 for the same value of 18 - TI. In paper [2]we presented a number of other results, in particular, those near first-order transitions close to second-order transitions; moreover, some experimental data concerning BaTiO, and KH,PO, type ferroelectrics were discussed in [2]. It was also noted that above the Curie point BaTiO, showed, of course, no piezoeffect. But in the ferroelectric phase it must be observed, and paper [2] pointed to the corresponding possibilities for tetragonal or orthorhombic pyroelectric (polar) phases (i.e.,at T c 8; what was this phase in BaTiO, was then unknown). I do not want to dwell here in more detail on the content of paper [2] because it was published in English as well. 3. The main shortage of paper [2]was that if treated, in fact, the one-dimensional case alone where spontaneous polarization Po was aligned in only one direction. This approach is pertinent in the consideration of the properties of Rochelle salt or KH,PO, type substances possessing preferred axes already outside the ferroelectric phase. In the case of some ceramics, i.e., a polycrystal, for which the ferroelectric properties of BaTiO, were discovered [15],my consideration [2]with a single order parameter 13 was also natural. But in application to BaTiO, single crystals a more general approach with vector parameter 13 was needed. How to do it within the Landau theory is quite clear (see, for example, [16, 171). Why I did not do it at once can only be explained by the fact that my interest in this problem was insufficient and I was occupied also by quite different problems. But after the appearance of new experimental data [ 18-20] I eventually did it [3,4], although regretfully with some delay (paper [3] was submitted for
I
133
134
I publication on July 7,
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical a1od Other Remarks
1948 but could not already be published in English). Specifically, in [3,4]I used the thermodynamic potential (D = (Do + a(Pi
+%(Pi
+ Py' + P:)
+ Py" + P,")
+p2 (P2Py' + P; 1 +-s,, 2
P:
(o",+ o'w
+ s12 (oxxoyy+ ~
+ Py' P:)
Devonshire (21-231. The potential used in those papers differed from (7) only by addi1
tion ofthe term - 6' (P: + Py" + P,") . Mean6 while, when writing terms of the order of 9,one should use the general expression (P2 = P; + Py' + P,")
@,(P)
1
= GY1 p6 + Y2 [Pi(Py' +
+ o',,)
This was later done by Kholodenko and Shirobokov [24]. Incidentally, in [21]Devon(7) shire referred to my paper [2],and therefore he might have paid attention to the Landau - Y1 (oxxP,"+ oyyPy'+ .zzp:, theory, but failed to do it and hence obtained - Y2 [ o x x (P," + Pi?) only a particular result. Paper [21]was submitted for publication on July 26,1949, i.e., + on (P,"+ P i ) + crzz (Pi+ P,")] a year later than (31. At the same time, as - 2 Y3 (oqPxPy + oxzpxpz has been said, in ref. [21] the role of @-order terms was at least partially allowed for, +o y z ~ y ~, ) ( E X P X + EyPy + E Z P Z ) , and the experimental data, in particular, where = ( 9 ) = {P', Py, P,} is the polari- paper (251,were also used and taken into zation vector (the order parameter) and oik account much wider than in [3]. So, I do not is the stress tensor. in the least want to diminish the value of Devonshire's works. + Ek 'k) , and (7) In equilibrium Ei = apl, implies the relation for Ei, Pi, and oik. At 4. Quite a noticeable role in the understandT < 8, when a < 0, solutions are possible that ing of the mechanism of ferroelectric and correspond tetragonal and rhombohedra1 some other transitions has been played by symmetries. Furthermore, in [3] the coeffi- the so-called "soft mode" concept. It concients fll and f12 were so chosen that the ab- sisted in the following. Under second-order solute minimum of (D corresponded to the transitions and first-order transitions close tetragonal structure in accord with the ex- to the tricritical point, the frequency on one perimental data [18].I shall not present for- or several normal crystallattice modes tends mulas here, for they coincide with those to zero or strongly decreases. For real crysavailable in all modern courses (see 11,171). tals, however, the picture may be very comUnfortunately, I do not remember why I did plicated. The "soft mode" concept has set in not include in [3,4],unlike [2],terms of the gradually as a result of a number of experiorder of pb. Therefore, solutionscorrespond- mental and theoretical studies. It would be ing to the orthorhombic phase were not interesting to see a comprehensive analysis found and first-ordertransitions close to the of the history of this question. I can only tricritical point were not considered. This make some comments on this issue. As far shortage was partially offset in papers by as I know, Landsberg and Mandelstam [26]
+Ts" 1
(ov 2
x x ~ ,+, oyy%z)
+ UiZ+ 0;)
4 Phase Transitions in Ferroelectrics: Some Historical and Other Remarks - V. L. Ginzburg
were the first to pay attention to the “soft mode” in 1929 during the study of combinational (Raman) scattering of light in quartz near the a q p transition. It turned out that the line of 207 cm-’ (at room temperature) extends and smears out with rising temperature, and disappears altogether in p-quartz (i.e., at T > 8 = 846 K). Later on it became clear [27-291 that as the temperature grows, the frequency of this line falls sharply. These facts were taken into account by A. P. Levanyuk and me in the paper [30] published in 1960 and devoted to the spectral composition of light scattered near second-order phase transition points. In that paper we spoke of the “soft mode”, i.e., the disappearance of the frequency of the oscillation responsible for the transition, as a well-known concept (the corresponding quotation is presented also in [S]). I would not like, however, to dwell in more detail on light scattering and “soft modes”, the more so as 1 can refer in this connection to the reviews [31, 321. Now I shall notice that the “soft mode” appeared explicitly already in papers [3, 41, that is, in 1949. Since papers ($41 were not translated into English, I shall present, although it has already been done in [8], a rather long quotation: “Let us also consider the dispersion of the dielectric constant of barium titanate. This problem is much more complicated than the one considered above because it does not admit a purely thermodynamical treatment. It can, in fact, be solved only through the lattice mode investigation. Some statements and dispersion estimates can however be made without such consideration. For simplicity we shall restrict ourselves to the case of a field aligned parallel to a spontaneous moment, i.e., along the corresponding axis of the cube”.Next, comparing the static expression 2 a P + 2 p, P, = E (here P is polarization along the indicated axis) with the equation of motion for an anharmonic oscillator
m [ + ~ t + k & + s =&e ~ E,
I
(9)
we come to the equation (for the field E = E~ eiwt)
p P+ v P + a P
E ’ + p1 p 3 = 0
P = e N c , p=-
elcer
2
m
v=-
2e2 N ’
z 2e2N
’
(10)
From this, for the dielectric constant E we obtain the expressions 2n:
E =
a
+ i o v - o2p , T > q 2n:
E =
-2a+iwv-w
2
p
,TLOg3 fl. cm). (4) moderate dielectric breakdown (100-120 kV/cm for bulk and 500-800 kVlcm for thin films). and ( 5 ) nonlinear electrical, elcctmmechanicnl,and electroopic behavior. Not all of these properties arc optimized and realized in a given material of chemical composition,and. heme. a variety of ceramic materials are manufactured and arc available from several different companies Lhroughout the world. A summary of typical properties for selected compositions is given in Table III. Small-signnl (1 W )relative dielectric constam values for several rloeted compositions are given in Table 111. They range from a low of 225 for lead niohate to a high of 24 OOO for PMN-F'T (WIO).Values for the PZT and PLZT compositions are intermediate. ranging from 1300 for PZT-4 (a hard. A-sitesuhrtituted piezo material) to 5700 for a phase-boundary. relaxor P U T material:The loss tangents (tan 8 ) vary in value from 0.4% to 6% for the various ceramics, and. in general. the lawer loss lactors arc associated with the lower dielectric constants. IS) Hysteresis Zopst The hysteresis loop (polarization versus electric field) is the single most imponant measurement that can be made on a femlectric cenunic when charncteriz-
6 Fernelectric Ceramics: History and Technology - C.H. Haertling April 1999
Ferroelectric Ceramics: Hiscon. und Technology
-
09 v: c.
809
ing its electrical behavior. This loop is very similar to the magnetic loop (magnetization versus magnetic field) one obtains from a ferromagneticmaterial: the very name " f e m l e c tric" has been appropriated from rhis similarity. even though there is no fern, i.e.. iron constituent, in ferroelecuics as a major component. Hysteresis loops come in all sizes and shapes, and, similar to a fingerprint. identify the materid in H very special way. Therelore. one should become familiar with such a measurement. Although early workers in the field of fcnoelectrics utilizd a dynamic (60 Hz) measurement with a Sawyer-Tower circuit and an oscilloscope d o u t . more-recent work usually has been done with a single-pulse or dc (-0. I Hr)Sawyer-Tower measurement using an X-Y plotter or computer readout." Typical hysteresis loops obtained from various femlecmc ceramic materials are illustrated in Fig. 11: (A) a linear tracing from a BaTiO, capacitor. (B) a highly nonlinear loop from a low-eoercive-field (soft)memory fcnoclecuic such as is found in the rhombohedral region of the FZT phase diagram, (C) a narrow. nonlinear loop obtained from a slim-loop fermelearic (SFE)quadratic relaxor that is located in the F E P E boundary region of the PL2X system. and (D)a double loop that typically is obtained from a nonmemory antifemxlecuic material in the PSZT system. The antifemelectric materials are essentially nonpolar. nonfemlectric ceramics that reven to a ferroelectric slate when subjected to a sufficiently high electric field. Outwardly, they differ from the SFE relaxor materials in that (1) the dielectric cons tan^.. usually are lower. (2) higher electric fields are usually required to induce the ferroelectric state, and (3) the onset of the fcrroelectric state and rhe return of the antifermelectric state are usually fairly abrupt. thus giving the loop an appearance of two subloops that arc positively and negatively biased. These characteristicsare shown in loop (D)in Fig. 1 1. A considerableamount of information can be obtained from a hysteresis loop. Figure 1 I also shows that ( I ) the loop in (B) mveals that the material has memory, whereas the loop in (C) indicates no memory. (2) high remanent polarization (P.) nlates to high internal polarizability. strain, electromechanical coupling. and electmptic activity. (3) for a given material. the switching field (E,) is an indication of the grain size for a given material he.. lower E, means larger grain size and higher E, means smaller grain size), (4) a high degree of loop squareness usually indicates betw homogeneity and uniformity of grain size, ( 5 ) an off-cenered loop from the zero voltage point (the loop is usually centered symmetrically amund zero voltage) indicates some degree of internal electrical bias that may be caused by internal space charge andlor aging, (6) the sharpness
Fig. 11. Typical hyrlereris loops from Y~VIWS kmrlecbic ccrmicb: (A) BaTiO, capacilcf, ( 8 ) soh (easily swishable) FZT. (C)PLZT 8.616935 relaxor, and (D)PSZT antifmoeleclric material.
170
I
6 Fernelectric Ceramics: History ond Technology
XI0
Journal of rhr American Crnirnir Socirn-Hacnling
of the loop tips indicates a high electrical resistivity (>LO" fl.cm). (7)high induced polarization in relaxor matcrials indicates high electmtriction strain and high elecmopuc coeficients. (R) the slope of the P-E loop at any point along the loop IS equal to the large-signal dielectric constant, (9) the opening up of the loop of a SFE relaxor material can indicate nonohmic contact between the e l e c d c s and the ccramic. and (10) a ruddcn large change in "apparent" polarization is usually a result of incipient dielectric breakdown. Remanent polarizations for most of the Icad-mntaining ferroelefnics typicnlly vary from 30 to 40 pC/cm*. whereas the coercive fields v q over quite a wide range. from -2 kV/cm to near electrical breakdown I- I25 kV/cm), depending on the type of dopants and moctificrs added. The strains asmciated with two of these materials (i.e.. ferroelectric and SFE) on traversing their hysteresis Imps are given in Fig. 12. In the ferroclectric caw. the switching strain accompanying the polarization nversal pmccss results in the familiar "butterfly" loop, with the rcmanent stmin state in the center of the loop (point 0).Positive voltage then results in a longitudinal expansion of the ceramic. whercas Q negative voltage (less than the coercive field) nsulu in a longitudinal contrncuon. This is known as the linear strain effect in piezoelectric materials and does not involve domain switching. For the SFE relaxor case, there is no remanent strain when the electric field is not applied, because. in his caw. the rest position of the ion is in the ccntcr of the unit ceU. However, when ihe field is applied. ionic movement (polarization) and strain occur simultaneously. both being dependent upon the strength of the field. Because the sign of the strain produced (positive for elongation) is the same regardless of the polarity of tbe field. this is the elecvostrictiveeffect mentioned previously. tC) Pirxwlrrtrir and &/ectnistricriue Pmpmies; Compositions within the PZT and P U T system possess some d h e highest elecmmechanical coupling mfticients anninable in ceramic mal~rials.Somc typical values of k tlz. d,l, and g33far rhesc materials an! given in Table If1with BaTiO) and the niobaterr. Maximum values of &,, (0.72) and tfI3(710 x IFt2C N arc found in the soft (easily switchabk) P U T composition 7/60/40.This composition is located within h e morphotropic phase-boundary region Separating the fermelectric rhombohedrnl and tetragml phases. Over the yean, there his been considerable speculation concerning the reasons for this maximum in coupling at the MPB.wb' These may be sumnhuized a\ being due to ( I ) the existence of a mixture of phases at the boundary. (2) a concurrent maximum in dielectric
. &.
-4
Vol. $2. No. 1
constant at the MPB. (3) a Iiiger number of rwrienubk polarization directions existing in the MPB mixed-phase region. and (4) a maximum in mechanical compliance in the boundary region. permitting maximum domain reorientation without physically cracking. Also included in Table 111 are some Iypical elcctraslrictiveQ and m values for representative compositions. Tible 111 shows that most QI1 coefficients arc in a rather nmow rdngc of 0.010-0.022 m4/C2. as are the Q,:coefficients in a range of 0.008-0.012 m4/C2.Also given the Q vnlucs of two PLZT ferroelectric compositions (7/65/35 and 8/65/35) for comparison. pointing out the observation that the Q coefficients art: similar in magnitude regardless of the ferrwlecuic or nonrerroelecmc nature of the material. Thi5 is because the Q cocffi cient relates the resulting strdin to the electrically induced polarization. regardless of whether w material has permanen1 polarization. The m coefficients. on the ocher hand, relate the htruin to the electric field; hence, their valucs v q more widely. ranging m2N2. from 1.7 Y IO-'" to 1 I .7x ( D J Pyrrickcfrir Properties: Although the pymelectric effect in crysmlline materials has been known for many centuries. it has been within only the last four drcsdes that this cffect hac been studied in ferrocleclric As mentioned previously. this effect occurs in polar materials and is manifested in a change in polrcriution a\ a function of tempenrure. This results in a reduction of the bound charge required for compensation of the reduced dipole moment on increasing temperature and vice versa on decreasing temperaturn: thus. the change in voltage on the material's electrodes is a measure of the change in the muterial's polarization due 10 absorbed thermal energy. A common figured-merit for pyrorlectricr is
P
FOM = cfK tan
w2
(13)
where p is the pyroclecmc charge ccxFficient. c the spccific heat. and tan 6 the dielectric loss mngcnc. Maximizing the performance of a material then involves selecting a ceramic with a high pyinelecuic coefficient and low specific heat. dielectric constant. and dielecmc loss factor. This is difficult to achieve in a given material. and. most often. i b performanceis limited by the dielectric loss, which is reflected in a poor signal-to-noise rntio. Two families of cerimics have dominated this area of endeavor: PLT and BST (barium strontium timate) nlaterinl.*. However PLZT and PMN are aka considered viable candidates. The former two materials are considered femrlectric thnmal dclectors (absorbed energy generating the tempernturedependent change in polnrization). w h e w . the latter two. as well as EST. can be Lunsidercd dielwuic bolometers (cleclricnlly induced. temperatureaependent change in dielectricconstant niak.rialst.O*Ceramics. in many cascs. are considered better choices for thermal imaging applications than crysulline mamiids with higher pymeleeuic cocffcienLsbecause of their lower cost, availability. ease of processing, and good stability. These marerials in bulk and thin-film forms are used is commercial products for lawenforcement, night rurveillwe. and .wcuritv applications. (El Optical and &kctrooptic Properties: Unlike the PZT cewnics and other ferroelectric mtcrials that are opnque. the most outstanding feature of the PLZT materials is their high optical tmnslucency and uanspnncy. Optical trdnsparrir) is both a function of the concentrationof lanthanum and the ZrtTi ratio with a maximum in lranspilrcncy occwring along the FEPE phasc houndivy and beyond. until mixed phases produce opacity (!tee Fig. 5). For example. the 65/35 ZrlTi ritio canlpositioas am most transparent in the lanthanum range rrom R to 16 at.%. whereas the lorn0 compositions arc simikarly transparent in the 22% to 284 range. A typical transmission curve for a 9/65/35 composition ib
6 Ferroclectn'c Ceramics: History and Technology - C.H. Haertling
then
111
V.
Fig. 13. Tlie material is highly absorbing helow 0.37
pn. w tiich ir the commonly ;iccepted value for the onset of high ahwrption in the hulk material. For thin films. this u l u e 1. closer to (1.35 pii. A fairly consrant opticid transmission of -0Y; wcurs throughnut the h h l c spcrctnini from 0.5 fin1 to tlic nsdr infriirrd iit 6.5 p i (\cc inset). Beyond this. nhsorption ;,pin hrgiiir to tiikr place. and. at I?pin. the material IS.once ain. fully iihwrhing. The liigh-\urlace-rcflectilin I ~ s s e \ 3 l ( i h r I\W wrl;ue';i rhown in lig. 13 :a ii function of tlie gli index nf rcfriictii)n ( 1 1 - 13 I uf [he PLZT.
h u r common tjlx, oScIcctro~)pticeffect\ have heen iound to he opcr;ttivc in Ierrorlectric rnatenal~in general and In iic, in p;inicular t I ) quadratic. Kerr. and hirefrint l i depolarizntion aonriiemory scattering. ( 3 ) lin-
. and hirefringent effects. and 14)niemor).
scattering. The t w ( i t y c s uttliic rclaxor-type. 'N65/35nialeriah w t h Iiiieaily polari~edlight: the third type uses a high coercive field. tctrag~inal.mernnq material. such a\ 12/40/60. with polariied light; and tlie fourth type comnionly uses a low coercivc field. Ihoriih~hedral.memory material. such as 7/65/35. and doe\ not use polariiers. hut. rather. relics on the variable-angle \tattering of light from diffcrent pliuiLed areas to achieve a \patiall) varying iniagc in the ceruinic, Contrast ratios as high as 3OWI can he attained with polarized light. whereas thesc :otio\ are limited to <W/I for \chcmes involving nonpolarized. icattercd light. Specilic properties of the more-common PLZT electrooptic compositions are lirted in 'Tahlc 111. PlLT iniiterials tire ulso known to pohsess many special photosensitive phenomena that are directly linked to their nticrostructural. cheniiciil. electronic. ;mi optical prnperties. including ( I ) photoconductivity. (7)photovolt4c proprrtles. ( 3 ) photo-nwstcd domain switching. (4I ion-implantationenhanced phoio\ensitivity. ( 5 t photochromic effects. ( 6 ) phoiomcchanicsl (photostrictive) behavior. (7)photorrfracrivc effects. and (XI plioroexcitcd space charge phenom~na.~"." Although materials with such a multitude of propenics and q x i a l effect\ hold promise for mnny new applications for the future. i t shcruld nlso be remenibcrrd that these same eHbcts can. and olten do. limit their application
100
a, u K
60
m 2z .-
40
F
t-
2c
0 I
Appliuitiuns
-
t f
h
5
171
The applications lor ferrorlectric ceraniics are nianilold and prrvasive. covering all areas of our workplaces. homes. and autoniohiler. Similar 10 mo>t materials. the successlul applicar i m of these piezoelectric. pyroelectric. ferrnelcctric. electrnstrictive, and clectrooptic ceramics and films are highly Jependent on the relative ease with which they can he iidiiptcd to iiseful and reliahlr. devices. This is. to a great extent. the rc.ason that they bavc been s(r successful over the years in linding an increasing nuniber of applications. Their \iniplicity. compact iiw. low co11. and high reliahility are very attractive fc;iiiircs ti) the design engineer. Many generul category npplic;itions f o r bulk and film electnxeraniics are given in Fig. 14 As indicated in Fig. I?. some of thcse applications are more appropriate for hulk materials, some for films, and some for huth hulk and lilnis. Although there always will bt: a Jc.mnnd for hulk devices. it i s cenainly obvious that the trend in the industry i s toward film devices. The reasons lor this include (I)lower operating voltages. (21 si2.e and weight conipntibility uith integration trends. ( 3 ) hettci processing conipatihility \\ it11 rillcon technology. (4) case d' fahrication. and (51 Itiucr cost\ through tntegrdtion. ti) Capacitors One category of applic:itions for ferrixlectric-type matcrialk is that of high-dielectric-constant capacitor\. particularly MI,(:s. MLCs are cxlremely important to our everyday lives i n that they are essential to a11 of our currently prcduccd electronic components. and. as such, they constitute i t significant portion of the multibillion dollar electronic ceramic\ business as a whole. Most ceramic capacitors we, in reality. highdielectric-constant ferrnrlectric compositions which have their ferrorlecuic (hysteresis Itwp) properties suppressed with suitable chemical dopants while reraining a high dielectric const:int o \ w a broad temperature range. BaTiO, was hislorically h e first composition used for high-diclec.lric-constant capacitors. and i t (or its variants) remains the industry standard: however. lead-containing relaxon such as PMN and PLN are making I n tune with ever-shrinking electronic compmests in
Reflection Losses
80
I
xi I
Fcrriwlcclric Cprumicr: H i w r v ~ i n d'I'iY'/rnclhk,fi.l
/
PLZT 9/65/35 0 375 m m Thick
Fie. 14. Applications of hulk and film ceramic electronic m i a l s . this age of integration, capacitor techniques have trended loward ( I ) more-sophisticated tape-casting pmcedures, (2) surface-mount W s , and (3) tired layer thicknesses appmaching 4 pm. MLCs. 0.5 mm x Imm and several hundred layers thick, am now produced with capacitances of several microfarads. Tape-casting methods arc now reaching their practical limit. and thin-film deposition techniques an being explored. Typical applications include gmeral-use discmte and MLCs. voltagevariable capacitors. and energy-storage capacitors."*,*O By far the largest majority of applications for electro-active materials occurs in the orea of piezoelectric ceramics. In this category. the ceramics are usually poled once at the factory, and no polarization norientation takes place after that throughout the life of the device. Tbse devices can be divided into four different groups, as given in Fig. IS.Two of these groups are as mentioned previously. i.e., motors and generators: however, the third category involves the use of combined motor and generator functions in one device, and the fourth category includes devices operated at higher frequencies. i.e., at resonance. Because of the more-recent interest in electrically biased electrostrictive devices that act as electricallytunable piezoelectric components. some of the specific applications in Fig. 15 are also now being developed with eltcvastrictive materials. Examples of ceramics that arc utilized in a vpriety of piezoelectric and electrosuiaive applications. both large and small. are shown in Fig. 16. Figure IS also shows that he number of applications for piezoelectrics as motors is quite numemus. This is particularly m e for the whole family of micro- and macro-pinOelectric actuators. The micro-devices are considered to bc mOse that utilize the basic piezoelectric strain of the ceramic (mcasumi in micrometers), whereas the macro-devices we those that use a displacement-amplifyingmechanism w enhance the fundamental strain (masurd in millimeters). This is explained more thoroughly in Table IV, which lists dl of the current ctramic actuator technologies and includes some of their important characteristics. Table IV shows that a variety of direct extensional configurations, composite flextensional srru~turcs, and bending-mode devices are used to achieve a mechanical output. Maximum smss generation (40MPa) or loading capability i s noted for all of the direct extensional devices. including the piemelectrics, electrostrictors, and antiferroelectrics: however,
their strain (displacement) is limiled to 4S% or lens. On the other hand. maximum displacement of several tens of percent can be achieved with displacement-amplifyingmeans, such as composite (flextensional sm~ctu~e, Moonie) or bender (unimorph. bimorph. RAINBOW)shuctures. but this is usually accomplished at the expense of considerably less force generation, greater complexily. w d higher cost. In most cases, the aCNatOrS are operated with electric fields 4 0 kV/cm for longevity and reliability. However, even such modest fields can result in rather high voltages (>lo00 V) if the actuator is relatively thick ( V = El); thus. the multilayer technology devcloped for capacitors is often used to reduce the operating vdtage below I 0 0 V. Although unimorph and bimorph structures have been SUE-
Fig. 1s. Piezoelectricand clecrrostncfive applications for ferroelectric ceramics.
174
I
6 Ferroelectric Ceramics: History and Technology
Monolithic ( d 3 ,mode)
4 E 3 V
D
Morulliiluc td,, mx*l
40
Eapansion
P
0.m
40
Conmion
P
4.1s
40
Expansion
E
n.2x
40
Contraction
E
-0.09
A
0.50
Expansion
A
0.08
Contraction
PE
. + Monolithic (sll mode)
D4
Q
V
Monolithic (sI? mode)
. + Monolithic (sI
4IIC
D
D
Composite structum td,, mcuic) (flextunstonall
4
v
40
8 9 V
10
-1.0
I'nitnrnph (bender, Bimcirph 1 kndcr)
Kamhiw nxmomtxph (berukr)
4 6 %
D
modc \ia explosive shock wuvcs or projective impact. uscful few hundred kilovolls or kiloamps lasting lor many microvcMfds can k obuined.These oncshac supplies have found ntany USLS in miliwry applications. "m
ClCCtnCdl pulses of u
ywer
(3) Composifes Piezcxlecmc coniposites represent one of the latest technologies developed for engineering the lac1 hit of high performance from a pierwlccuic transducer. When nu delikntcly intmduco a second phase in a material. conncaivily of che phases is a critical parameter. There are 10 connectivity paltrms possibk in a twa-phiru solid, ranging from 0-0 (unconnected three-dimensional checkerboard pattern) to 3-3 (interpenelrat-
ing pattern in which both phases am three-dimensionally selfconnected). Some of lhrse connectivity panems nrc panicularly well wited for decoupling the longitudinal and t r a n a v e ~
picznekctric effects. such that materials with significantlyenhanced (up w a factor of 100 or more) pianlecuic pmpcrtiea arc possible. Moreover. a ceramic-polymer comptwite offers distinct advantages, such &E a wide rnnge of acoustic impedance matching. b W bandwidth. low elecnieirl losses. and, for medical ultrasound applicatianr. send-receivc capahiliiy in a m p a a package. Considerahk mgincaing ingenuity has been demonstrated in designing. fabricating. and packaging the many types of diphasic s t ~ ~ c t ~ pMajor c z . applications include hydrophones. sen5ors. and mcdicnl ulmtsonics.L1'"
G Ferroelectric Ceramics: History and Technology - C . H. Haertling Apnl I Y W
Fc~rror~l~~nric (.'rrumics: IKrtory o ~ Trrhnokrgy d
I
81.3
FIR. 16. Vanety of ferroclccuic ceranlicn used in picmelcctnc and electmstrictivr applications. such a( sonar. accelemnielers, actuators. and Sensow (Photograph counery of ED0 Western.)
cessfully applied to many devices over the past four decades. their inability to extend the force-displacement envelope of perfumiance has led to a search for new actuator technologies. One mch device developed in the early 1990s is the Mnonie$11named hecause of its crescent-shaped, shallow cavities on the interior surfaces of the end caps (see Table IV), which are bonded to a conventionally electrnded pirznclcctric ceramic disk. When the ceramic is activated electrically, the shallow cavities permit h e end caps to flex, thus convening and amplifying the radial displacement of the ceramic into a large axial motion at the center of the end cups. Advantages of the Moonie include (1) a factor of 10 enhancement of the longitudinal displacement. (2) an unusually large d , , coefficient exceeding 2500 pCIN. and (3) enhanced hydrostatic respon~e,'~~''Recent improvements in the basic Moonie design have resulted in an element called a Cymbal. a device that possesses more-flexible end caps. resulting i n higher displacement." Applications include tranrduccr arrays, medical imaging transducers. and hydrophones. Another device recently developed ti] increase the fnrcedicplaceinent performance of a piezoelectric actwdtor is the RAINBOW. In its most basic sense. a RAINBOW can be thought of as a premessed, axial-mode bender similar in operation to the more conventional unimorph Ixnder. Unlike the unimorph and Moonie. which are composite svuctures, the RAINBOW is a monolithic monomorph that IS produced from a conventinnnal. high-lead-containing piezoelectric ceramic by means of a high-temperature. chemical reduction reaction. As inentioned previously. this process produces significant intrrnal compressive and tensile stresses that are instrumental in achieving it5 unusually high displacement characteristics. Displacements a3 high RS 0.25 mm fnr a 32 inm diameter x 0.5 mi thick wafer have been achieved for these devices in a dome
mode of operation while suatairiing loads of 1 kg. Marinrum displacements (if > I mm can be achieved wilh wafers (32 nini diameter), thinner than 0.25 mi when operating in a saddle mode. Prototypes of RAINBOW pumps, speakers, optical deflectors. vibratory feeders. relays. hydrophones. switches. platform levelers. Sensor and actuator arrays. and toys have been demonstrated: however. no commercial products have been yet k e n prodr~ced.~'.'~ Sonie examples of these different types of' piezoelectric devices are included in Fig. 17. A novel type of bimorph application of somewhat recent vintage is the optoniechanical (photostrictive) actuator. The photostrictive behavior is a result of a combined photovolktic effect (wherein light prcxluces a voltage in the ceramic) and a piezoelectric effect (wherein this voltage pmduces a strain in the material via the converse piezoelectric effect). PLZT ceramics with donor-type doping exhibit large photosuictive effects when irradiated with high-energy. near-ultraviolet light. A bimorph configurarion with no connecting wires has heeii used to demonstrate prototypes of a photo-driven relay and a remntc micro-walking device, and a photophone of the future has been
envisioned.".'" (2) Explosive-ro-Eleemd Transducers (EETs) Studies on the stress-induced depding of ferroelecrric ccntmics were initialed in the mid- 1950s. which culiuinatid i i i the development uf one-shut power supplies that iiiade use o f this effect. This depnling behavior is optimum (1.e.. iriaxioiuiii oirtpur in the shortest period of dine) for ferroelectric coinpo sitions located along the houndary between the polar ferroelrr tric phase and the nonplnr antiferroelectric phase. wch shown in the gray m a of the phase diagrerri uf Fig. 5. Althiwgh this depoling does cur somewhat more slowly undei hydrostatic pressure. when it is accnmplished in an extremely last
173
Fig. 18. C'innmcrci;tl and military applications of PLLT elcctrwiplic cc'ra~nic\:rsianing at upper nphi and guing c l a h w u EEU-I@ ~ flyers goggles ilhoiograph counesy of Sandin Nauonal I.ahoraiorics.), RI-R cockpit viewing p n (Photograph counery of Sandin Saiional 1.abora11rries.1.film wnicn tl'hoiogmph cciunc\) of LYI'.).offwi image \crier il'hoiogrnph counesy of Steigcr.1. and premier image enhancement s)stcnl (Photograph i.oune,) of Exmian Krxlak. 1
iiuns. revstance degradation. and nicmory imprint (persistent memory. i 2 . the revawnce t o \witch out of a given memory IS hright ant1 cuntinuer to gel even hrighter ar the tramition i s made from pawive to electrically a c m e " w a r t " and "verj snlafl" materials. In this reg&. a m a n material senses a change in the environment and. using an cxtemal feedhick control system. inakes a useful response. I\ in a ccimhined \ensor/ocriiator ceramic A very sman malerial mires ii change i n the env~r~~nnient and responds by reacting aiid tuning (self-oontrolling~one or more of i t s propenies to irptiiiiire itr hchawir. An example of the sman iype FI a piemelecti-ic cer;miic and of the very smim type i s a nonlinear. e l c c t r ~ i m i o t i \ c relitxur. Multifunctionitlit) i s ;I key concept o i tl~cssroiiterial\ thai will he exploitctl with all the ingrnuit) that design engineer\ c:m mu\ter." I n the future. inure and inure application\ iur nonlinear. electri~stri~iive relaxor niatenals. rucli a\ PMN and PLZT. will miergc a\ thc rclriitles\ drive toward niiniatunmtioii and integrdiiun continuex Indeed. this wry trend will also encouray' more inateri;il\ rewnrch efforts to develop hctter ferroelectric ;ind t'lertn~rtrictiveceramic\. .A\ niche ;ipplicationa heconic morc prevalent in the future.
composites and displacement-amplifsing techtiiquc:a and inatcrials will proliferate in a continuing effort to widen tlie forcedisplacement envelope of performance. There device>. t w . w i l l hecome smarter and smarter a s the applications dcmand. Urought on by the need for higherapacity nicniuricr. expanded data processing capability. and marter device.;. the direction set a few y e m ngo for fcmxlectric films i s expected 10 continue and hroadeit in scope Thin- and thick-lilm teclinologies alike will also share in thc current trend toward coniposiie and gmiled .truciures with .;pecificolly engineered. :ind often unique. propenies. .Multiply deposited layers of different materials. or graded layer5 of the wine inatcrial. are mrw achiebahle with m i s t conventional film depisition pmccsse\ on a micro scale, and this will he more commonplace i n the future on a nanu scale.xn')I Bccause thin- and thick-film technulugies generally h not limit. hut rather enhance. the portfolio o f materials to be used in venous applications. it is expected that a viiricty uf maicriiih w i l l continue to be studied. but there will he a. narrowing do.c\n to fewer senou'i candidates of known behavior in order to bring the devices i n development t i ] the marketplace. Undouhtedl). HST. PZT. PLZT. PMN. and SBT are destined to he leciding candidate\ in thk arena. Keprding f i l i r i depo~itiiintcc1iiiiipc\. ;it thtr htage in thc de\~c.lopruentCJI' the filnis. i t is v e r j drl'liculr io .judge which lilni deposition technique will emerge ;1\ tlie lawrite: howvcr. hecoure scvernl niethtdr have heeii u\ed wccessfully. i t i s moqt likely that several methud\ will uiri iw. md a specilic nierhcd selected will he dictated hy C I ~ S I :uiJ the applicaticm.
mented transmissive and reflective Several coinmercial and military applications tor PLZT shutters and linear gate arrays are given in Fig. 18.
Fig. 17. F~;amplesof FZT,PLZT. and PMN piczoelecuic w d clwtrnsuictive dcviccr: tstllning at upper right and going clockwise) Mcb ~"ola tweeter. Triangle pm-grill lighter. Yoiomla himorph. Murpta ,ntcrmdiatr frequency reslmators, Morgan Maim ulkasonic c k m r icramic5. Aura RAINBOW cernrnicrclarric Cunslanl Ccnmrr." Id, E ~ KChrm.. . .XI I II ] 1007--lOY llY4hI "R R Gray. "Trandurer and M e l d of Making Sanu." U.S. Pn1 Nn 2 486 SM. I W V "11. Jaifr. "Ytrzwlrcmc Cmmci." J Am C ~ r u n i .$or. 41 (I11 Pun II. 4W-% 11958) "B Jaffe. W R. C w k Jr.. and H. Juilc. pi'. 1-5 tn Pa.:orlei~nrfoumm.
''K llardil. "Ferrnleerr~i": In K,rk.Orhntcr: Enrsc,lopcdu oj Chmi,l-el Tmhnolv#y. Vol 10, 3rd cd , pp I 30 Wile). New York. I'JXU "'W C C d y . P i ~ : o d ~ r i r t c t pp r ~ , 1-20 McGrrr-Hill. NCU York. 1V4h. ""IEEE Slandard IXiwitions of Pnmory Fc~txlcctnuTeen*." ANSlnEFE Std. I8tl-IYXh.pp 1-11, IEEE, Neu Y w L 19x6. '""IRE StanSanlh cm Ptewclcctric Cryatnl~ Mcawrcmmr.; of Picxxlccmc Ccramr.;. Ivhl." P ~ MIRE. . 49 171 I1614Y (1961) lafir and D. A. Bcrlincoun. "Picroclccaic Trdnrducer Matcnrlr." Pm Bdlallsw. "plczucle~tncq Old Eficct. New Thmur."IEEE 7mn.r UI.
27. 31-34 fIYHOI "M A M c y and P A Davis. "Slandnrd SELECT EIccm~smcl~rc Lead Magnmum Niohslc Actualon for Activc and Adaptive Optical Com~mcnlr." opr Enxnp.29(111 1373-X2(lWn :'I..F. Cmrr. "Relaxor Pemleciric\:' F c r r w l e d r t ~ . 76. ~ , 241-67 (1987). 1. Zhao. Q.M Than& N . Kim. and T. Shnrul. "Elrcuumcchanrrrl ProperiRcliror Fefmclccvic Lcad Mdgnmuni Niohate-lrad Tiunate CcramJpn. I Appl. P h s . . P m I. 34 [I01 S658-63 t l 9 9 S ) :W P Harmer and D. M. Smyth. "Nanosrrucrure. Ikfrel Chemistry. 2nd Rnpcnles o i Rclaxcr Fcfmclec~ncs."ONR Final Rcpt. No NWl14-82-K-01Yli. Izhigh Univerrily. Bclhlchcm. PA. Fcb. IW2. >OR. P. Umdcur. K. GJchigi. P. M. Pruna. und 1 '.R . S h w l . "llllra-High StrainCcramics with Muldplc Fncld-lnduccdPhase T m r i m n r " J. An. Crnim s w . , 7 7 l l l l 3 r 2 - 4 4 (1994). "G H Haenling. "F.lstro-opic C-icr d Dev~cer~'. pp 371492 In Elerrronir Ctmmicr. Fdacd hy L. M Lcvinwrt. Marcel Dckker. Ncu. York. IOR8 % Guudman. "Ceramic Capcilnr Materials": pp, 79 138 in Crromir Muirrtolr /or Elrrrronto. Fdiled hy R. C . B u c h u n . M a n ~ Dckker. l New York.
"R. Mancmk and R. Wmicke. "Cennuc Boundwy-lsycr Caprcilon." bps 7rch R m . 41 I I1112) 338--46(lYK31.
'W C lid1 and I t L Tullcr. "Cmmir Senum. Theor). and Pracucc". pp x for Elcrrn,ntcr. Edited by L. M Levinsnn Mnr. 265-371 tn C ~ m Mmtrialr c d Lkkker. NEW Ymk. IYHR. "I3 Kulwcb. "PrCu Maierixls 'Technology. IYSS-I9RO": pp. 138.54 III Advancer in Ccrdmicr. Vol I, GNW Roundnr) PhrnnmrM m tl*crnmic Crrumics Edwd hy L.M. Lrsmm. Amcncan Ccraniic Soeiety. Wcsierville. OH.
1981 '.ti Slurme. K Sulukt. and A. Taknla. "Phase Transitions m Solid Soluimn\