EMI Protection for Communication Systems
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY The technical descriptions, procedures, and computer programs in this book have been developed with the greatest of care and they have been useful to the author in a broad range of applications; however, they are provided as is, without warranty of any kind. Artech House, Inc. and the author and editors of the book titled EMI Protection for Communication Systems make no warranties, expressed or implied, that the equations, programs, and procedures in this book or its associated software are free of error, or are consistent with any particular standard of merchantability, or will meet your requirements for any particular application. They should not be relied upon for solving a problem whose incorrect solution could result in injury to a person or loss of property. Any use of the programs or procedures in such a manner is at the user’s own risk. The editors, author, and publisher disclaim all liability for direct, incidental, or consequent damages resulting from use of the programs or procedures in this book or the associated software.
For a listing of recent related Artech House titles turn to the back of this book.
EMI Protection for Communication Systems Kresimir Malaric
artechhouse.com
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
ISBN-13: 978-1-59693-313-2
Cover design by Greg Lamb © 2010 ARTECH HOUSE 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Disclaimer: This eBook does not include the ancillary media that was packaged with the original printed version of the book.
Contents Preface CHAPTER 1 Communications Systems 1.1 Components of Communications Systems 1.2 Transmitter Systems 1.2.1 Transmitter 1.2.2 Randomization 1.2.3 Encryption 1.2.4 Encoder 1.2.5 Interleaving 1.2.6 Modulation 1.2.7 Mixer (Upconverter) 1.2.8 Filter 1.3 Receiver Systems 1.3.1 Filter 1.3.2 Mixer (Downconverter) 1.3.3 Demodulator 1.3.4 Deinterleaver 1.3.5 Decoder 1.3.6 Decryptor 1.3.7 Derandomizer 1.3.8 Demultiplexer 1.3.9 Received Power 1.4 User Interface 1.4.1 Graphical User Interface (GUI) 1.4.2 Voice User Interface (VOI) 1.5 Antenna Systems 1.5.1 Duplexer 1.5.2 Antenna 1.6 Power Supplies 1.6.1 Power Supply Types 1.6.2 Power Amplifier
xiii 1 1 2 3 4 5 5 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 15 15 16 16 18 18 19 19 19 20 22 23 23
v
vi
Contents
1.7 Considerations for Voice Versus Data 1.7.1 Text 1.7.2 Images 1.7.3 Voice 1.7.4 Video Selected Bibliography
23 23 24 24 24 24
CHAPTER 2 Electromagnetic Spectrum Used for Communications
27
2.1 Electromagnetic Spectrum 2.1.1 Extra Low Frequency (ELF) 2.1.2 Super Low Frequency (SLF) 2.1.3 Ultra Low Frequencies (ULF) 2.1.4 Very Low Frequency (VLF) 2.1.5 Low Frequency (LF) 2.1.6 Medium Frequency (MF) 2.1.7 High Frequency (HF) 2.1.8 Very High Frequency (VHF) 2.1.9 Ultra High Frequency (UHF) 2.1.10 Super High Frequency (SHF) 2.1.11 Extra High Frequency (EHF) 2.1.12 Infrared (IR) 2.1.13 Visible 2.2 Spectrum Division Selected Bibliography
27 28 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 33
CHAPTER 3 Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems
35
3.1 Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics 3.1.1 Smith Chart 3.1.2 Snell’s Law of Reflection and Refraction 3.2 Wave Generation and Propagation in Free Space 3.2.1 Maxwell’s Equations 3.2.2 Wave Propagation 3.2.3 Wave Polarization 3.2.4 Fresnel Knife-Edge Diffraction 3.2.5 Path Loss Prediction 3.3 Wave Generation and Propagation in the Terrestrial Atmosphere 3.3.1 Absorption and Scattering 3.3.2 Wave Propagation in the Atmosphere Selected Bibliography
35 39 42 44 44 46 47 48 51 53 53 54 55
CHAPTER 4 Electromagnetic Interference
57
4.1 Electromagnetic Interference with Wave Propagation and Reception 4.1.1 Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN)
57 57
Contents
4.1.2 Thermal Noise 4.1.3 Shot Noise 4.1.4 Flicker (1/f ) Noise 4.1.5 Burst Noise 4.1.6 Noise Spectral Density 4.1.7 Effective Input Noise Temperature 4.2 Natural Sources of Electromagnetic Interference 4.2.1 Lightning and Electrostatic Discharge 4.2.2 Multipath Effects Caused by Surface Feature Diffraction and Attenuation 4.2.3 Attenuation by Atmospheric Water 4.2.4 Attenuation by Atmospheric Pollutants 4.2.5 Sunspot Activity 4.3 Manmade Sources of Electromagnetic Interference 4.3.1 Commercial Radio and Telephone Communications 4.3.2 Military Radio and Telephone Communications 4.3.3 Commercial Radar Systems 4.3.4 Industrial Sources 4.3.5 Intentional Interference Selected Bibliography CHAPTER 5 Filter Interference Control 5.1 Filters 5.1.1 Lowpass Filter 5.1.2 Highpass Filter 5.1.3 Bandpass Filter 5.1.4 Bandstop Filter 5.1.5 Resonator 5.2 Analog Filters 5.2.1 Butterworth Filter 5.2.2 Chebyshev Filters 5.2.3 Bessel Filters 5.2.4 Elliptic Filters 5.2.5 Passive Filters 5.2.6 Active Filters 5.3 Digital Filters 5.3.1 FIR Filters 5.3.2 IIR Filters 5.4 Microwave Filters 5.4.1 Lumped-Element Filters 5.4.2 Waveguide Cavity Filters 5.4.3 Dielectric Resonator Selected Bibliography
vii
58 58 58 59 59 59 59 59 64 65 67 68 69 69 74 74 75 76 77 79 79 80 80 81 83 83 85 85 86 87 88 88 91 91 93 94 97 97 98 100 101
viii
Contents
CHAPTER 6 Modulation Techniques
103
6.1 Signal Processing and Detection 6.2 Modulation and Demodulation 6.2.1 Analog Modulations 6.2.2 Digital Modulation 6.3 Control of System Drift Selected Bibliography
103 105 105 112 120 120
CHAPTER 7 Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
123
7.1 Field-to-Wire Coupling 7.1.1 Skin Effect 7.1.2 Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) 7.1.3 Ferrite Filter 7.2 Electric Field Coupling to Wires 7.3 Magnetic Field Coupling to Wires 7.4 Cable Shielding 7.4.1 Tri-Axial Cable 7.4.2 Cable Termination 7.4.3 Shielded Twisted Pair Cables Selected Bibliography
123 123 125 126 128 131 132 133 133 134 136
CHAPTER 8 Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling
137
8.1 Field-to-Aperture Coupling 8.1.1 Shielding Effectiveness (SE) 8.1.2 Multiple Apertures 8.1.3 Waveguides Below Cutoff 8.2 Reflection and Transmission 8.2.1 Electric Field 8.2.2 Magnetic Field 8.3 Equipment Shielding 8.3.1 Gasketing 8.3.2 PCB Protection 8.3.3 Magnetic Shield Selected Bibliography
137 138 138 140 141 145 146 147 147 148 149 151
CHAPTER 9 Electrical Grounding and Bonding
153
9.1 Grounding for Safety 9.1.1 Shock Control 9.1.2 Fault Protection 9.2 Grounding for Voltage Reference Control 9.2.1 Floating Ground 9.2.2 Single Point Ground
154 154 155 156 156 157
Contents
ix
9.2.3 Multipoint Ground 9.2.4 Equipotential Plane 9.3 Bonding for Current Control 9.3.1 Bonding Classes 9.3.2 Strap Bond for Class R 9.3.3 Resistance Requirements 9.4 Types of Electrical Bonds 9.4.1 Welding and Brazing 9.4.2 Bolting 9.4.3 Conductive Adhesive 9.5 Galvanic (Dissimilar Metal) Corrosion Control Selected Bibliography
158 158 159 160 160 162 162 163 163 164 164 166
CHAPTER 10 Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
167
10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted 10.1.1 Sources of Electromagnetic Interference 10.1.2 Test Requirements for Emission and Susceptibility 10.1.3 Standard Organizations 10.2 Commercial Requirements 10.3 Military Requirements 10.3.1 Specific Conducted Emissions Requirements Mil-Std 461E 10.3.2 Specific Conducted Susceptibility Requirements Mil-Std 461E 10.3.3 Radiated Emissions Requirements Mil-Std 461E 10.3.4 Radiated Susceptibility Requirements Mil-Std 461E Selected Bibliography
167 167 171 173 177 178 178 179 181 182 182
CHAPTER 11 Measurement Facilities
185
11.1 Full Anechoic and Semianechoic Chambers 11.1.1 Absorbers 11.1.2 Ferrite Tiles 11.2 Open Area Test Site (OATS) 11.3 Reverberation Chamber 11.4 TEM Cell 11.4.1 Characteristic Impedance 11.4.2 Higher-Order Modes 11.4.3 TEM Cell Construction 11.4.4 Parameter Measurements 11.5 GTEM Cell 11.5.1 GTEM Cell Characteristics 11.5.2 GTEM Cell Construction 11.5.3 GTEM Cell Parameter Measurement 11.5.4 Current Distribution at Septum Selected Bibliography
185 187 189 191 193 195 196 197 198 200 201 203 203 204 211 212
x
Contents
CHAPTER 12 Typical Test Equipment 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5
12.6
12.7 12.8 12.9
LISN—Line Impedance Stabilization Network Coupling Capacitor Coupling Transformer Parallel Plate for Susceptibility Test Coupling Clamps and Probes 12.5.1 Capacitive Coupling Clamp 12.5.2 Current Probe Injection Clamps and Probes 12.6.1 Current Injection Probe 12.6.2 EM Clamp 12.6.3 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Generator EMI Receiver Spectrum Analyzer Oscilloscopes Selected Bibliography
215 215 216 217 217 218 219 220 221 221 221 223 224 225 225 225
CHAPTER 13 Control of Measurement Uncertainty
227
13.1 Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty 13.1.1 Type A Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty 13.1.2 Type B Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty 13.2 Distributions 13.2.1 Normal (Gaussian) Distribution 13.2.2 Rectangular Distribution 13.2.3 U-Shaped Distribution 13.2.4 Combined Standard Uncertainty 13.2.5 Expanded Uncertainty 13.3 Sources of Error 13.3.1 Stability 13.3.2 Environment 13.3.3 Calibration Data 13.3.4 Resolution 13.3.5 Device Positioning 13.3.6 RF Mismatch Error 13.4 Definitions Selected Bibliography
227 227 228 228 229 229 230 230 231 231 231 231 231 232 232 232 232 232
Appendix A Communication Frequency Allocations
235
A.1 Frequency Allocation in the United States A.2 International Frequency Allocation
235 245
Contents
xi
Appendix B List of EMC Standards Regarding Emission and Susceptibility
255
B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.5
255 256 256 258 259
Cenelec Australian Standards Canadian Standards European Standards Other Standards
Acronyms and Abbreviations
261
Glossary
265
About the Author
267
Index
269
Preface Communication today is not as easy as it was in the past. Protecting numerous communication services, which are operating in the same or adjacent communication channels, has become increasingly challenging. Communication systems have to be protected from both natural and manmade interference. Electromagnetic interference can be radiated or conducted, intentional or unintentional. Understanding physical characteristics of wave propagation is necessary to comprehend the mechanisms of electric and magnetic coupling in the communication signal paths. Different modulating techniques, as well as encoding and encrypting, can improve bit error rates (BER) and signal quality. Communication systems must be designed properly, so that the performance of their system capabilities is not subject to degradation or complete loss due to electromagnetic interference. Although there are numerous books available on electromagnetic compatibility, signal processing, and electromagnetic theory, there is no book offering a comprehensive description of technologies for the protection of communication systems, which includes discussions on the improvement of existing communication systems and the creation of new systems. The book provides laymen with basic information and definitions of problems regarding electromagnetic interference in communication systems. In addition, it gives an experienced practitioner knowledge of how to solve possible problems in both digital and analog communication systems. The examples given in the book are intended for an easier comprehension of otherwise demanding electromagnetic problems. The book’s primary audience includes designers, researchers, and graduate students in the area of communications. The book is organized into 13 chapters dealing with fundamental concerns of developers and users of communication systems. • •
•
•
• •
Chapter 1 gives an overview of communication system components. Chapter 2 deals with the use of the electromagnetic spectrum for communications. Chapter 3 describes wave propagation in free space and the terrestrial atmosphere. Chapter 4 discusses natural sources of electromagnetic interference, such as attenuation of atmospheric water or lightning, as well as numerous manmade sources of electromagnetic interference. Chapter 5 covers analog, digital, and microwave filters. Chapter 6 deals with signal processing and modulation/demodulation issues in communication systems.
xiii
xiv
Preface •
•
•
• •
Chapters 7 through 9 are devoted to electromagnetic field-to-wire and aperture coupling, as well as to electrical grounding and bonding. Chapter 10 gives the commercial and military requirements for radiated and conducted emission and susceptibility. Facilities for EMI measurement such as TEM and GTEM cells, open area test sites, and reverberation chambers are covered in Chapter 11. Chapter 12 includes the description of coupling capacitors and transformers, coupling and injection clamps and probes, and other test equipment. Chapter 13 deals with the control of measurement uncertainties. Appendix A gives a list of communication frequencies, and Appendix B gives a list of EMC standards.
The program TEM-GTEM on the CD-ROM accompanying this book works in the LabVIEW environment on a PC Windows operating system. The TEM-GTEM program requires prior installation of LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 8.6 – Windows 2000/Vista x64/Vista x86/XP on any computer which does not already have LabVIEW 8.6 installed. The Run-Time engine can be found on the CD-ROM in the folder: runtimeengine. The second folder, tem-gtem, contains the tem-gtem.exe as well as Installation.doc and Instructions.doc file. The application TEM-GTEM has two programs: TEM and GTEM. The first program, TEM, calculates the characteristic impedance Z0 (in ohms), and cutoff frequencies (fc) for modes TE01, TE10, TE11, TM11, TE02, TE12, TM12, and TE20 depending on the TEM-cell dimensions. The second program, GTEM, calculates the cutoff (fc) and the associated stimulated resonant frequencies (fr1, fr2, and fr3) in megahertz for higher-order modes H10, H01, H11, H20, E11, and E21. The resonances are also shown graphically. A detailed explanation on the theory for the TEM cell and the GTEM cell can be found in Sections 11.4 and 11.5, respectively. I wish to thank Artech House editors Lindsey Gendall, Barbara Lovenvirth, and Mark Walsh for their encouragement in writing this book. Finally, I thank my wife Blazenka and my parents Marija and Vladimir for their love and support throughout this project.
CHAPTER 1
Communications Systems 1.1
Components of Communications Systems A communication system usually consists of the information source, transmitter, channel, receiver, antenna systems, amplifier, and end user (Figure 1.1). It converts information into a format appropriate for the transmission medium. A transmitting antenna’s purpose is to effectively transform the electrical signal into radiation energy, whereas the receiving antenna’s purpose is to effectively receive the radiated energy and its electric signal transformation for further processing at the receiver. Communication systems can be either analog or digital. Historically, analog systems (Figure 1.2) are simpler but less resilient to interference. Analog communication systems convert (modulate) analog signals into modulated signals. Signals that are analog are converted into digital bits by sampling and quantization, also called digitization and coding. Digital systems can reconstruct original information, are better protected from interference, and have the potential to code signals, thus enabling larger amount of data transportation. It is important that the information sent from the source and the information sent to the end user are similar as possible (i.e., identical in the case of digital information). Even though digital systems are used more for communications, analog systems will not be neglected in this and other chapters. With digital systems, there is a source and channel coder instead of signal processing in the transmitter, as is the case when dealing with analog systems. In the receiver, there are also channel and source decoders instead of the signal processing of analog systems. The modulator and demodulator should be designed to lessen the distortion and noise from the channel. The channel transports the signals using electromagnetic waves. There is always noise in the channel along with the useful signal. The source coder (Figure 1.3) converts the analog information to digital bits using analog to digital conversion (A/D). The transmitter converts the signal (analog) or bits (digital) into a format that is appropriate for channel transmission. Distortion, noise, and interference are brought into the channel. The receiver decodes the received signal back into the information signal and then the source decoder decodes the signal back to the original information (analog or digital).
1
2
Communications Systems
Source of information
Transmitter
Receiver
User
Channel
Figure 1.1
Communication system.
Transmitter in baseband
Source
Processing
Modulator
RF stage Channel
User
Processing
Demodulator
RF stage
Receiver in baseband
Figure 1.2
Analog communication system.
Transmitter in baseband Source
Source coder
Channel coder
Digital modulator
RF stage Channel
User
Decoder
Decoder
Digital demodulator
RF stage
Receiver in baseband
Figure 1.3
1.2
Digital communication system.
Transmitter Systems A transmitter system is used to send information/data from one user to another. The source information can be analog or digital. Digital systems are usually more complex than the analog ones and require more modules. Both the transmitter and receiver systems should have the same complexity. For example, if we have a modulator on the transmitter side, there should be a demodulator on the receiver side. The same applies for the coder, multiplexer, and so forth. Usually, transmitter systems have a multiplexer, randomization, encryption, an encoder, interleaving, a modulator, a mixer (upconverter), a power amplifier, a filter, a duplexer, and a
1.2 Transmitter Systems
3
transmitting antenna. Not all systems require all of the mentioned modules; this depends on the type of communication used and/or on the required security level. 1.2.1
Transmitter
The multiplexer provides multiple dedicated channels to users and combines the data (bits) from every channel into one combined stream of data bits. These bits are organized into frames; a frame has a fixed length of bits. Every user is allocated a specific position in the frame. There must be a synchronization code or sequence of bits inside the frame in order to provide the ability to identify each frame and the relative position of the bit inside the frame. There should also be a clock for the correct transmission of the data. In this way several signals can share one communication line, instead of having one line for every signal (Figure 1.4). Multiplexers (MUX) can range from two input signals up to sixteen or more. For more input signals, a cascade (consisting of simpler multiplexers) is used. Typically they are 2/1, 4/1, 8/1, or 16/1, indicating the number of input signals and only one output signal. Figure 1.5 shows a 4/1 multiplexer. This means that four input signals share one communication line. The input signals are I0, I1, I2, and I3. The output is Z. Which signal will pass from input to output is decided on the basis of control signals a1 and a0 as shown in Table 1.1. Input E enables (E = 1) or disables (E = 0) the multiplexer.
MUX
DEMUX
Conversation 1
Conversation 1
Conversation 2
Conversation 2
Conversation 3
Conversation 3
Conversation 4
Conversation 4
Conversation 5
Conversation 5
Figure 1.4
Use of one line for several communications.
MUX 4/1 I0 I1 I2
Z
I3 E a1
Figure 1.5
Multiplexer 4/1.
a0
4
Communications Systems Table 1.1 Combination Table for Multiplexer 4/1 a1
a0
Z
0
x
x
0
1
0
0
I0
1
0
1
I1
1
1
0
I2
1
1
1
I3
E
1.2.2
Randomization
Randomization is used to ensure the even number of 0s and 1s in the data information, which should be randomly distributed. The process of randomization is carried out by the exclusive or adding (XOR), which adds a bit from a selected bit sequence to each bit within the multiplexer frame, except for the synchronization bits. The bit sequence that is used to randomize is called pseudorandom or pseudonoise (PN) sequence. The random distribution of the bit sequence matches the Gaussian distribution. This function happens simultaneously with each multiplexing frame. PN codes can be generated using a series of shift registers and logic gates in feedback as shown in Figure 1.6. There is also a modulo-2 adder (adding without carry). The shift registers receive a clock signal every Tc seconds. The feedback lines can be used to obtain difr ferent output codes. For r shift registers, a maximum of 2 − 1 bit sequence can be produced. This means that with four shift registers, a maximum of fifteen bit sequences can be achieved. After that, the combinations will start repeating themselves. It is possible to connect the feedback gates to produce a shorter sequence, but shorter sequences are less random and will repeat more often. A circuit configured to produce the maximum sequence of nonrepeating bits for a given number of shift registers is called a maximal length PN code generator. The main characteristic of this maximal length code is that the Modulo 2 sum of any sequence with a shifted version of itself will produce another shifted version of the same sequence. All combinations will appear only once except all the 0 combinations, as this state will cause no changes to occur in the shift register values or in the output. The number of 1s will always be 1 larger than the number of 0s, independent of the length of the code. PN signal out Modulo 2 adder Shift register 1
2
Clock signal
Figure 1.6
Pseudonoise generator.
3
4
r
1.2 Transmitter Systems
5
This type of PN generator is used in the transmitter to modulate a continuous wave signal, as well as in the receiver, where an identical PN generator is used to demodulate the received signal. 1.2.3
Encryption
Encryption is used to protect the data should it be intercepted. Usually the bitstream is changed (encrypted) in such a way that it would be difficult to reconstruct the original bitstream without a decryption device. A problem develops if there is an error in the received bitstream, which results in an additional error in the decryption process. This is called error extension. Encryption has been used in wars and for information protection for a long time now. It can be used in computer systems and communication systems for authorization, copyright protection, and other applications. For the encryption process, an encryption key is required. It is usually 40 to 256 bits long. The longer the key (cipher strength), the harder it is to break the code. There are two methods available: the secret and the public key. With the secret key, both sender and receiver use the same key to encrypt and decrypt the bitstream. This is the fastest method, but there is the problem of getting the secret key to the receiving side. With the public key, each recipient has a private key that is kept secret and a public key known to everyone. The sender uses the public key to encrypt the data, whereas the recipient uses the private key to decrypt the data. In this manner the private key is never transmitted, and thus is not vulnerable to interception. The most spread encryption standards are the Data Encryption Standard (DES) and the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). DES (Figure 1.7) is the most widely used encryption standard, dating from the 1970s. It has blocks of 64 bits at a time, and the key length is 56 bits. The 64 bits of the input block to be enciphered are first subjected to initial permutation. The permutated input block becomes the input to a complex key-dependent computation. The output of that computation, called the preoutput, is then subjected to permutation, which is the inverse of the initial permutation. The computation which uses the permuted input block as its input to produce the preoutput block consists of 16 iterations of a calculation depending on the cipher function. Today DES is considered insecure because a key of 56 bits is not long enough. That is why in 2002, AES was adopted, which is capable of processing data blocks of 128 bits using cipher keys with lengths of 128, 192, and 256 bits. More on AES can be found in “Announcing the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” which is free to download from the Internet [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips-197.pdf]. 1.2.4
Encoder
Encoders are used in transmitter systems for detection and correction of errors that may occur during transmission due to noise or interference. Coding can also be used for compressing the information. Most encoders add the redundant (known) bits expanding the data (information bits). This slows the traffic. How many redundant bits will be added depends on the surrounding of our communication service (interference) and on the importance of the information being transmitted in real time.
6
Communications Systems Input (64 bits)
Key (64 bits)
Initial permutation
Key permutation
Initialization
Left half (32 bits)
Right half (32 bits)
Cipher function
Round 1
Left half (28 bits)
Right half (28 bits)
Binary rotation
Binary rotation
Subkey #1 (48 bits) Cipher function
Round 2
Binary rotation Subkey #2 (48 bits)
Cipher function
Round 16
Permutation
Binary rotation
Permutation
Binary rotation
Binary rotation
Subkey #16 (48 bits) Finalization
Final permutation
Permutation
Output (64 bits)
Figure 1.7
Data Encryption Standard algorithm.
The differential encoder, convolutional encoder, Reed Solomon coding, and Golay encoder are most often used in communication systems. 1.2.4.1
Differential Encoder
Differential encoding of data is required for modulations such as duobinary and differential phase shift keying. These modulation types are used for optical links and high data rates of 10 to 40 Gbps. The principle of differential encoding is shown in Figure 1.8. dk
c k−1
Figure 1.8
Differential encoder.
XOR
1 bit period delay
c k = ck−1 d
1.2 Transmitter Systems
7
Let dk be a sequence of binary bits that are the input to a differential encoder and let ck be the output of the differential encoder. Then we have c k = c k −1 ⊕ d k
(1.1)
where ⊕ is the modulo 2 addition. The direct implementation of the above equation is the use of an exclusive –OR (XOR) gate with a delay in the feedback path of 1 bit period delay. At 40 Gbps, 1 bit period is equal to 25 ps. 1.2.4.2
Convolutional Encoder
Information data is susceptible to errors. For useable data, there are methods of encoding information. This means organizing the 0s and 1s so that errors can be corrected. Convolutional encoding is applied to the data link signal in order to correct bit errors that might occur during transmission, which results in coding gain for the system. Through the convolutional encoding/decoding process, the majority of transmission errors will be corrected before they are passed onto the decryption process. Codes have three primary characteristics: length, dimension, and minimum distance of a code. The code’s length is the amount of bits per code word. The code dimension is the amount of actual information bits contained within each code word and the minimum distance is the minimum number of information differences between each code word. Convolutional codes are commonly specified by three parameters: (n, k, m) where n is the number of output bits, k is the number of input bits and m is the number of memory registers. The quantity k/n is called the code rate R and is a measurement of coding efficiency: R=
k n
(1.2)
Commonly k and n parameters range from 1 to 8 and the code rate accordingly from 1/8 to 7/8. Memory registers, m, can range from 2 to 10. Another parameter, the constraint length K, is defined by: K = k ⋅ ( m − 1)
(1.3)
which represents the number of bits in the encoder memory that affects the generation of n output bits. A convolutional encoder can be made with a K-stage shift register and n modulo-2 adders, where K is called the constraint length of the code. An example of such an encoder with K = 3 and n = 2 is shown in Figure 1.9. For each bit entering into the register, the output switch samples n = 2 code bits out (u1 and u2); hence the rate of the code k/n is 1/2. Each output code bit will be a function of the input bit (located in the leftmost stage of the register) plus two of the earlier bits (in the rightmost stages). The larger the constraint length K, the greater the number of past bits that have an effect on each output code word.
8
Communications Systems
u1 Input bit m u2
Figure 1.9
1.2.4.3
First code bit Second code bit
Output branch word
Convolutional encoder: K = 3, rate = 1/2.
Reed-Solomon Coding
As with convolutional encoding, RS coding adds redundant bits and creates code words that enable the decoding process to correct errors. RS differs from convolutional encoding by performing block encoding (using bytes) rather than bitwise encoding. Because of the block encoding, RS is eight times faster than convolutional encoding. The incoming data stream is first packaged into small blocks, which are treated as a new set of k symbols to be packaged into a super-coded block of n symbols, by appending the calculated redundancy. Such symbols can either be comprised of one bit or of several bits (symbol code). Therefore, the information transfer rate is reduced by a factor called code rate (R), and the modulator is expanded by the ratio: 1 n = R k
(1.4)
A Reed-Solomon decoder can correct up to t symbols that contain errors in a code word, where 2t = n − k
(1.5)
A Reed-Solomon code word is generated using a special polynomial. All valid code words are exactly divisible by the generator polynomial. The general form of the generator polynomial is
(
g( x ) = x − a1
)( x − a )K( x − a ) i+1
i+ 2t
(1.6)
The code word is constructed using: c( x ) = g( x )i( x )
(1.7)
where g(x) is the generator polynomial, i(x) is the information block, c(x) is a valid code word, and a is referred to as the primitive element of the field.
1.2 Transmitter Systems
1.2.4.4
9
Golay Code
Marcel J. E. Golay discovered the possible existence of a perfect binary (23, 12, 7) code, with error-correcting capability t = 3, that is, capable of correcting all possible patterns of three errors in 23 bit positions, at the most. So the Golay (23, 12, 7) code 12 is a perfect linear error-correcting code consisting of 2 = 4,096 code words of length 23 and a minimum distance of 7. Golay also defined the parity check matrix for this code as: H = ( MI11 )
(1.8)
where I11 is the 11 × 11 identity matrix and M is a 11 × 12 defined matrix. Since the code’s length is relatively small (length = 23), the number of redundant bits is 11, and the dimension is 12, the Golay (23, 23, 7) code can be encoded by simply using look up tables (LUTs). A look up table is an array that holds a set of precomputed results for a given operation. This array provides access to results faster than computing the result of the given operation each time. Beside the perfect binary Golay code, there is the extended binary Golay code that encodes 12 bits of data in a word with a length of 24 bits, so that a triple-bit error can be corrected and a quadruple-bit error detected.
1.2.5
Interleaving
Interleaving is used to intermix the bits of the code words generated through convolutional encoding. The motivation for interleaving is to compensate for burst or sequential errors, which can otherwise exceed the capability of the decoder to correct errors. Each code word generated through convolutional encoding can only correct a limited number of errors that occur in that code word. Sequential errors can cause multiple errors in a single code word, which can exceed the error-correcting capability of the decoding process. Interleaving distributes bits in such a way that, if sequential errors do occur, they will be distributed over multiple code words. For example, seven errors in a single code word will be distributed during interleaving into seven code words each having a single error. While the decoder may not be able to recover data in a code word with seven errors, it can easily recover a single error in seven code words. The disadvantage of interleaving is the delay created by writing a block of bits into memory, intermixing the bits, and then pulling the bits from memory. This delay is dependent on the number of bits that are interleaved at a time and the data rate of the aggregate bitstream. Interleaving is performed only on a finite block of bits at a time. Similar to multiplexing, interleaving requires framing the aggregate bitstream and adding synchronization bits. Interleavers are divided into periodic and pseudorandom. In periodic interleavers, symbols of the transmitted sequence are scrambled as a periodic function of time. Periodic interleavers can be either block or convolutional.
10
Communications Systems
1.2.6
Modulation
Modulation is the process of changing one or more parameters of an auxiliary signal, depending on the signal that carries the information. This auxiliary signal is called the transmission signal. The signal that carries the information (and controls the parameter changes of the transmission signal) is called the modulation signal. The result of the modulation is the modulated signal. The process is performed in a device called the modulator, which converts the total digital bitstream into the radio frequency (RF) analog signal. The digital bitstream is usually modulated into the intermediate frequency (IF), which after amplification is upconverted to the transmit frequency. There are many analog and digital modulations that are used in communication systems. Analog modulations include: amplitude modulation (AM), frequency modulation (FM), phase modulation (PM), and several others. Digital modulations include frequency shift keying (FSK), phase shift keying (PSK), amplitude shift keying (ASK), quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), pulse code modulation (PCM), and others. Chapter 6 will discuss more on modulation and demodulation. 1.2.7
Mixer (Upconverter)
Mixers are used in transmitter systems for easier processing of the signal. It is much cheaper and easier to amplify the signal at a lower intermediate frequency (IF) than at a higher radio frequency (RF). The mixer inputs two different frequencies (one of them is a local oscillator frequency) and mixes them. The result is the sum and difference of the input signals. The frequency that is not needed must be filtered out. Figure 1.10 shows the mixer, which has a local oscillator frequency added to or subtracted from the input frequency. For upconversion of the frequency, the local oscillator frequency fLO is added to the input signal frequency fin: f out = f in + f LO
(1.9)
True systems mixers will produce more than just the sum and difference of the input signals. There will be intermodulation products from the input signals. If a second signal fin2 arrives at the input with the fin, the mixer will generate intermodulation products at its output due to inherent nonlinearity, in the form
Mixer Input signal
Output signal
Local oscillator
Figure 1.10
The mixer.
1.3 Receiver Systems
11
± m ⋅ f in ± n ⋅ fi in2
(1.10)
where m and n are positive integers, which can assume any value from 1 to infinity. The order of the intermodulation is defined as m + n. Accordingly, 2 fin − fin2, 2 fin2 − fin, 3 · fin and 3 · fin2 are third order products by definition. The first two products are called two-tone third-order products as they are generated when two tones are applied simultaneously at the input. Two-tone third-order products are very close to the desired signals and are very difficult to filter out. 1.2.8
Filter
Filtering of the frequency range is an important part of every communication subsystem—hence the transmitter. Filtering is the ability to select the frequency range we wish to process and to block all other frequencies. Filters can be analog or digital. Figure 1.11 shows the symbols used for lowpass, bandpass, and highpass filters, depending on which frequency range needs to be processed further. On lower frequencies, LC filters are used, and on higher frequencies (such as microwave) the microstrip is used. Filters will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 5.
1.3
Receiver Systems The receiver system largely depends on the transmitter system. If in a communication system a multiplexer is used on the transmitter’s side, there must be a demultiplexer on the receiving side. The same applies for other blocks mentioned in the previous section, which on the receiving side are placed in reverse order. Some receivers must deal with very small signals. Better and more expensive receivers will introduce very little noise themselves. Again, depending on the complexity of the communication system, the following blocks are optional: filter, downconverter, demodulator, deinterleaver, decoder, derandomizer, and demultiplexer. 1.3.1
Filter
The filter is part of every receiving system. It selects the frequency band of use to be processed further and it stops signals on all other frequencies. The selectivity of the filter is shown by Q factor which can be calculated as Q=
Figure 1.11
fc f 2 − f1
Lowpass, bandpass, and highpass filters.
(1.11)
12
Communications Systems
where f2 and f1 are frequencies where the power drops by 50% (3 dB), and fc is the central or resonant frequency as shown in Figure 1.12. 1.3.2
Mixer (Downconverter)
On the receiving end of the communication system there is also a mixer, which in this case serves as a downconverter. It is necessary to downconvert the received RF frequency because it is much easier to amplify the signal at intermediate frequencies (IF) than at RF frequencies. Here, again, the local oscillator is necessary, and the output frequency is obtained as f out = f in − f LO
(1.12)
where the input frequency fin must be greater than fLO; otherwise an error will occur. The other result, that is, the adding of the two frequencies, will be filtered out. Again, intermodulation products may occur here. That is why it is necessary to take into consideration all possible transmitters in the vicinity (depending on the application, this can be up to 50 km) and calculate the intermodulation in order to determine whether additional filtering is required. 1.3.3
Demodulator
The demodulator converts an analog RF signal into a digital bitstream. It extracts the original information from the modulated carrier wave. There are different types of demodulation, such as envelope detection, differential, coherent, and synchronous demodulation. Demodulation and demodulators will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 6. 1.3.4
Deinterleaver
If a bitstream was interleaved in the transmission process, deinterleaving is required in the receiving process to reassemble the code words created by the encoder. Should any errors have occurred before deinterleaving, they will be distributed depending on the selected algorithm. Figure 1.13 shows the deinterleaving of an array of three element structures. Synchronization bits must be present to recognize when one frame is finished and the other is starting.
Bandwidth
f1
Figure 1.12
Selectivity of the filter.
fc
−3dB
f2
1.3 Receiver Systems
13
X[0] A X[0] B X[0] C X[1] A X[1] B X[1] C X[2] A X[2] B X[2] C X[3] A X[3] B A 3 A 2 A 1 A 0 Y0
X[3] C B 3 B 2 B 1 B 0 Y1 C 3 C 2 C 1 C 0 Y2
Figure 1.13
1.3.5
Deinterleaving an array of three element structures.
Decoder
The decoder in the receiver system must match the encoder that was used in the transmitter system. 1.3.5.1
Differential Decoder
If differential encoding was used in the transmitter system, differential decoding must be performed in the receiving system. The differential encoding process does not introduce redundant bits, but transforms the waveform by converting the space signal (zeros) into transitions. Accordingly, the decoding process converts transitions back to spaces. Since a single bit error affects two transitions, the differential decoding process doubles any bit error, corresponding to a 3-dB loss to the system. The decoder decodes the binary input signal. The output is the logical difference between present and previous input. The input and the output are related with m(t 0 ) = d (t 0 ) XOR initial condition parameter value m(t k ) = d (t k ) XORd (t k −1 )
(1.13)
where d is the differentially encoded input, m is the output message, tk is the kth time step, and XOR is the logical exclusive-or operator.
14
Communications Systems
1.3.5.2
Viterbi Decoder
The Viterbi decoder is used together with convolutional coding, and is applied to the data link signal to correct errors that may have occurred during the RF transmission. The encoding/decoding process adds what is referred to as coding gain, which may be necessary for the successful data link transmission. The decoding corrects errors before the decryption process of total bitstream. Correction of the errors occurs because the convolutional encoder (or transmit side of the data link) creates code words, which contain data bits with added redundant bits. The redundant bits allow the decoder to detect and correct errors that may exist in each code word. The process of decoding is much more complicated than the encoding process, and limits the speed of the bitstream that needs to be decoded. If the convolutional code uses 2n possible symbols, the input vector length is K · n for positive integer K. If decoded data uses 2k possible output symbols, the output length will be K · n. The integer number K is the number of frames processed in each step. The entry into the decoder input can be a real number (positive real is logical zero, while negative real is logical one), 0 and 1 (0 is logical zero, 1 is logical 1). The latter is called a hard decision. The third possible input is a soft decision. It can be any integer between 0 and 2b − 1, where b is the number of the soft decision bit b parameter. Here 0 is the most confident decision for logical zero, 2 − 1 is the most confident decision for logical one, and other values are less confident decisions. Table 1.2 shows the decisions for three bits. 1.3.5.3
Reed-Solomon Decoding
The Reed-Solomon encoder and decoder are commonly used in data transmission and storage applications, such as: broadcast equipment, wireless LANs, cable modems, xDSL, satellite communications, microwave networks, and digital TV. The block diagram of the RS decoder is shown in Figure 1.14. The received code word r(x) is the original (transmitted) code word c(x) plus additional errors: r( x ) = c( x ) + e( x )
Table 1.2
3-Bit Soft Decision
Input Value
Decision
0
Most confident zero
1
Second most confident zero
2
Third most confident zero
3
Least confident zero
4
Least confident one
5
Third most confident one
6
Second most confident one
7
Most confident one
(1.14)
1.3 Receiver Systems
r(x) Input
15
Syndrome calculator
Si
L(x) Error polynomial v
Figure 1.14
Error locations
Xi
Error magnitudes
Yi
Error corrector
c(x) Output
Reed-Solomon decoder.
The decoder will try to identify the position and the magnitude of maximum t errors (or 2t erasures) and correct the errors and erasures. A Reed-Solomon code word has 2t syndromes (Si) that depend only on errors and not on the transmitted code word. The syndrome is calculated by substituting the 2t roots of the generator polynomial g(x) into r(x). To find the symbol error location, solving simultaneous equations with t unknowns is necessary. First, the error locator polynomial (L(x)) is found using the Berklekamp-Massey or Euclid’s algorithms, with v being the number of errors. The roots of the polynomial [i.e., the error locations (Xi)], are found with the Chien search algorithm. Next, the symbol error values (Yi) are found using the Fornay algorithm. 1.3.5.4
Golay Decoder
The Golay coding can detect up to four bit errors in 24 bits (12 information bits) and correct up to three bit errors in 24 bits. If in 24 received bits there are three or less errors, the Golay decoding algorithm will detect the errors and correct them. If four errors appear, they will be detected but the exact pattern will not be determined. An error message will be displayed. If there are more than four errors, the Golay decoding will not provide the actual error pattern, and the information in the 12 bits will be lost. 1.3.6
Decryptor
Decryption is the process that reconstructs the original signal, which was altered through the encrypter in the transmitter. Decryption is required in the receiver system only if the encrypter was used in the transmitting system. Encryption is used as a protection means from signal interception. Error extension is possible during decryption (where multiple errors will be added for every error bit received). For decryption of the Data Encryption Standard (DES), the same encryption algorithm (Figure 1.7) is used, with the same key, but reversed key schedule (16, ..., 1). 1.3.7
Derandomizer
When randomization is used in the transmitting system, a derandomization of the data bitstream must be done in the receiving system. If synchronization bits are not randomized, they do not need to be derandomized. Synchronization bits identify the multiplexing frame, which is derandomized by Modulo 2 adding the same PN sequence that was used to randomize the frame to the bits within the frame.
16
Communications Systems
1.3.8
Demultiplexer
The demultiplexer (Figure 1.15) is a device that receives data from one input and distributes it on 2n possible outputs, where n is the number of control bits. Table 1.3 shows the combination table for the demultiplexer 4/1. The data c coming to input “Z” will be distributed to four outputs I0, I1, I2, and I3 according to the controlling combinations of a1 and a0. All other outputs will have 0 as the output value. The demultiplexer recreates the user channels from the total bitstream. The bitstream is organized into multiplexing frames with a fixed bit length. Every user channel is allocated a specific bit position inside the frame. Inside the frame there are synchronization bits, which are used in the demultiplexing process, in which the bits are distributed to the appropriate user channel. This is not all that has to be thought of when considering the receiver system. Received power, sensitivity, required ratio of signal to noise, and noise factor are just some of the important parameters that have to be taken into consideration when planning a communication link. 1.3.9
Received Power
Received power (Pr) at the receiving point is calculated using the effective area of an antenna (λ2/4π) and power density (Pt /4 · π · d2) as Pr =
Pt λ2 ⎛ λ ⎞ ⋅ = Pt ⎜ ⎟ 2 ⎝4⋅ π ⋅ d⎠ 4⋅ π 4⋅ π ⋅ d
2
(1.15)
where Pr is the received power, d is the distance from the transmitter to the receiver, Pt is the transmitted power, and λ is the wavelength of the signal. There are transmitting and receiving antenna gains Gt and Gr, for the antenna so the previous expression can be written as ⎛ λ ⎞ Pr = Pt ⋅ Gr ⋅ Gt ⎜ ⎟ ⎝4⋅ π ⋅ d⎠
2
(1.16)
DEMUX 1/4 I0 I1 Z
I2 I3
a1
Figure 1.15
Demultiplexer 1/4.
a0
1.3 Receiver Systems
17 Table 1.3 Combination Table for Demultiplexer 1/4 a0
Z
I0
I1
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
1
c
0
0
c
0
a1
1.3.9.1
I2
I3
1
0
c
0
c
0
0
1
1
c
c
0
0
0
Receiver Sensitivity
Receiver sensitivity is the minimum level of signal at the input of the receiver, which is required to achieve a sufficient level of signal-to-noise ratio for the demodulation. The sensitivity is determined with thermal noise Pterm, required ratio of signal to noise (S/N)req for demodulation, and noise factor (NF) as ⎛S⎞ Pr min = Pterm ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⋅ NF ⎝ N ⎠ req
(1.17)
Receivers have the lowest level of signal strength required to process the information without loss of data. With digital systems, a lower received signal strength will result in a lower rate of received information. Typically receivers have a sensi−9 −13 tivity ranging from −60 to −94 dBm (10 to 4 × 10 W). 1.3.9.2
Thermal Noise
The thermal noise of the receiver is defined as Pterm = k ⋅ T ⋅ B
(1.18)
−23
where k is the Boltzmann constant 1,38⋅10 J/K, T is the temperature in Kelvin (290–300K), and B is the frequency range width in hertz. The density of the thermal noise at room temperature (290K) is 204 dBw/Hz. The width of the frequency channel B is determined by the receiving filter width. Required ratio signal to noise in the receiver is the ratio of signal to noise required for a certain quality of the link (i.e., relative number of bits or frames with errors). The ratio of signal to noise is the difference between received signal and noise: S N[dB] = 10 log( S ) − 10 log( N )
(1.19)
For analog systems, the S/N ratio must always be above zero. In digital systems (spread spectrum), the signal can be buried in the noise. The higher the bit rate, the larger the signal to noise ratio must be. 1.3.9.3
Noise Factor
The noise factor of the receiver (NF) is the ratio of signal to noise at the input and output of the receiver:
18
Communications Systems
NF =
S N in S N out
(1.20)
This ratio can be from a fraction of a decibel for low noise microwave converters [0.3 dB for low noise block downconverters (LNB) for satellite applications] to 30 or 40 dB for spectral analyzers; typically the ratio ranges from 2 to 10 dB. This is actually the noise the receiver itself introduces into the system. The noise threshold is the sum of the thermal noise and the noise factor.
1.4
User Interface The user interface is the means for people to interact with the communication system. It consists of input of some sort and output. The input can be a command using a keyboard, voice, or text. We have heard of the phrase “user-friendly,” which means that it is simple to operate a certain device. When designing an application, a lot of care is taken to make a suitable user interface. Nowadays, there are hearing aids and other tools available for individuals with a handicap. Normally, the user interface is graphical (GUI), but it can also be operating via voice or touch. 1.4.1
Graphical User Interface (GUI)
The graphical user interface interacts with electronic devices through icons or visual indicators. Touch screens are one of the GUI types. There are also the command line and text user interfaces, which use a keyboard to type the commands. Main touchscreen technologies are resistive and capacitive. Resistive LCD touchscreen monitors rely on a touch overlay, which is composed of a flexible top layer and a rigid bottom layer separated by insulating dots attached to a touchscreen controller. The inside surface of each of the two layers is coated with a transparent metal oxide coating that facilitates a gradient across each layer when voltage is applied. Pressing the flexible top sheet creates electrical contact between the resistive layers, and closes a switch in the circuit. The control electronics alternate voltage between the layers and pass the resulting X and Y touch coordinates to the touchscreen controller. The touchscreen controller data is then passed on to the computer operating system for processing. Capacitive touch screens work by placing a very small charge at each of the four corners of the screen. When a finger touches the screen, the touch controller determines the change of capacitance of the screen from each of the four points and provides a touch value at the correct location. Surface acoustic wave touch screen technology is based on sending acoustic waves across a clear glass panel with a series of transducers and reflectors. When a finger touches the screen, the waves are absorbed, causing a touch event to be detected at that point. Because the panel is all glass, there are no layers that can be worn, which results in durability. Infrared technology is based on the interruption of an infrared light grid in front of the display screen. The touch frame contains a row of infrared LEDs and photo transistors, each mounted on two opposite sides to create a grid of invisible infrared light.
1.5 Antenna Systems
1.4.2
19
Voice User Interface (VOI)
The voice user interface can be activated through speech. Today hands-free commands are possible. The possibility of error when inputing a command or data by voice is higher than when entering it through a keyboard. Figure 1.16 shows a possible user interface for a communication device.
1.5
Antenna Systems Antenna systems consist of a duplexer and an antenna used to transmit and receive information from one user to another. There are many types of antennas that can be used for a communication system, depending on the frequency of use, power, application, and even international standard regulations. Most communication systems use the same antenna for transmitting and receiving a signal. This normally requires two antennas, which have to be physically separated. This is impractical, except in some cases of high interference when antenna diversity could be an option. That is why in most cases a single antenna is used for both transmitting and receiving the signal. This is possible with the use of a duplexer. 1.5.1
Duplexer
The duplexer makes it possible for receiver and transmitter systems to use the same antenna; otherwise it would be necessary to use two antennas. The duplexer has filters, which isolate the transmitting frequency from the receiving frequency. Since the transmitting and receiving frequency are usually not the same (because of interference), there must be a separation between them. The duplexer must be designed to operate in the frequency band used by both the receiver and the transmitter. It also must be able to operate on the power from the power amplifier. When working at the transmitting frequency, it must reject the noise from the receiver and vice versa. The duplexer can be made with a hybrid ring, cavity notch, and a band-pass/ band-reject design. Figure 1.17 shows the design of a reject duplexer using notch cavities.
Audio processor
Signal processor
Transmitter
Screen
User interface Keyboard
Figure 1.16
User interface.
Communication interface
20
Communications Systems To antenna Optimal cable length
Cavity tuned to transmitter frequency
Cavity tuned to receiver frequency
To transmitter To receiver
Figure 1.17
Reject duplexer with notch cavities.
Using only two notch cavities would probably not provide sufficient isolation for most situations. The cavity in the transmitter is tuned to the receiver frequency, and the cavity in the receiver is tuned to the transmitter frequency. That means that the cavity in the transmitter area will pass the transmitting frequency and notch (reject) the receiving frequency. The same applies for the cavity in the receiver area, which will pass the receiver frequency and notch the transmitter frequency. If there are other strong signals present, this design will not be enough. A more advanced design must include four to six cavities. Two or three cavities in each leg are more effective than just one. Usually the cavities require tuning with a spectrum analyzer or wattmeter. 1.5.2
Antenna
The antenna is a device that transforms a guided electromagnetic wave from the transmission line (waveguide or cable) into a space wave in free space. The antenna actually makes a transition between the guided wave in the transmission line and the space wave in free space. The most important characteristics of an antenna are: radiation pattern, directivity, impedance, gain, and affective area. 1.5.2.1
Radiation Pattern
Electric field intensity falls with 1/d, where d is the distance from the antenna. To measure the electric or magnetic field from the antenna, we have to be far enough from the antenna (only the radiating field exists). This happens at the distance d, d =
2D 2 λ
(1.21)
where D is the largest dimension of the antenna and λ is the wavelength of the signal. Then, knowing the electric field E, the magnetic field H can be calculated from H=
E η
(1.22)
1.5 Antenna Systems
21
where η is the impedance of free space, that is 120π or 377Ω. Usually the radiation pattern is given in two perpendicular planes: horizontal and vertical; it usually has one main lobe and several sidelobes. 1.5.2.2
Directivity
Often the goal of an antenna is to have most of the radiation in just one direction with much less radiation in other directions. The directivity angle is calculated as the angle where the power density is one half of the maximum and the field density drops for a factor of 1/ 2. Directivity is defined as the ratio of the power density radiated by the antenna in the direction of maximum intensity and the power density radiated by the isotropic radiator. The isotropic radiator radiates equally in all directions. Antennas with higher directivity are used to radiate as much energy to the receiver as possible. At the same time, dispersion of the signal in unwanted directions is diminished, thus making the interference to other systems smaller. 1.5.2.3
Antenna Impedance
Antenna impedance is the ratio of the voltage and current at the antenna. The most power from the generator will be given to the antenna if the antenna and generator impedances are complex conjugates (i.e., Z a = ZG* ). That means that their resistances must be equal, whereas their reluctances must be equal in magnitude but of opposite signs. Usually generators have an output impedance of 50Ω or 75Ω, so the antenna will have to be of the same impedance if possible. 1.5.2.4
Gain
Gain is related to the power received from the generator and represents the number showing how much larger the power from the isotropic radiator must be compared to the received power of the antenna, in order for the radiation from the isotropic radiator to be the same as the radiation from the observed antenna in the direction of maximum radiation. For an ideal antenna without losses, the gain would be equal to directivity. Gain of the antenna is usually given in decibels. 1.5.2.5
Effective Area
The effective area of a receiving antenna, Aeff, is defined as the ratio of received power, Pr, absorbed on a matched load connected to the antenna, and power density of the incident electromagnetic wave, Sr: A eff =
Pr Sr
(1.23)
The power density of the transmitting antenna in the maximum direction is equal to
22
Communications Systems
Sr =
Gt Pt 4⋅ π ⋅ d 2
(1.24)
where Gt and Pt are gain of the transmitting antenna and power of the transmitting antenna. The relation that connects the effective area and gain for all antennas is A eff =
1.5.2.6
λ2 ⋅G 4⋅ π
(1.25)
Antenna Types
There are many types of antennas, depending on the type of the application needed. They can be divided into four groups: electrically small antennas, wideband antennas, resonant antennas, and aperture antennas. Electrically small antennas are much smaller in dimension than the wavelength associated with the frequency on which they operate. They have small directivity and radiation effectiveness. They include Hertz’s dipole and monopole. To increase directivity, antenna arrays can be built. By changing the phase of the supplying currents, different radiation patterns can be obtained. Wideband antennas have a stable radiation pattern, gain, and impedance in the wide frequency range. The gain is small to medium. The biconical antenna and log-periodic antenna are examples of this type of antenna. Resonant antennas operate in one or more selective frequency ranges. They have a small to medium gain. The microwave microstrip antenna is a resonant antenna. Aperture antennas receive and radiate electromagnetic waves through an aperture. They have large gain, which increases with the frequency. The horn antenna and parabolic dish are examples of this type of antenna. 1.5.2.7
Smart Antenna Systems
A smart antenna system uses multiple antenna elements including signal processing to optimize its radiation pattern depending on the signal environment. The smart antenna interference is smaller, which enables reuse of the frequency more often. This can also improve the capacity of the link. Greater signal gain will result in lower power requirements at the receiving system with a smaller size and battery. The power amplifier used can be cheaper, with less total power consumption.
1.6
Power Supplies Power in communication systems is necessary for the operation of electronic components. For simple systems, a DC supply is sufficient. For the high power of a transmitter, a power amplifier is necessary. The transmitter system usually requires more power than the receiving system. The majority of power is used to amplify the signal before reaching the antenna. In calculating the communication link, a free space loss must also be taken into consideration. In addition, cable loss and match-
1.7 Considerations for Voice Versus Data
23
ing losses require the transmitted power to be raised. For small transmitting power, a simple 12-V DC supply is sufficient. Larger power requires power amplifiers. 1.6.1
Power Supply Types
Linear power uses a transformer to convert the voltage from the mains to a lower voltage. Converters, which transform 120-V or 220-V AC into a lower DC voltage (typically 12V or 24V), are often used for electronic circuits. There are many types available. An uninterruptible power supply (UPS) must be used in applications for which a constant power supply is necessary. UPS usually takes the power from the AC mains and charges its own battery at the same time. If there is a loss of power, the battery will provide the necessary power for some time. There are solutions where the UPS charges a battery with energy generated from internal combustion engines or turbines. Batteries are also often used for mobile communications. In some situations solar power might be used, especially in areas with a lot of sun. 1.6.2
Power Amplifier
Power amplifiers are used to increase the level of the signal, both in transmitter and receiver systems. They are used to amplify the low-level signal to a higher value. Power gain is described as ⎛P ⎞ G(dB) = 10 log10 ⎜ out ⎟ ⎝ Pin ⎠
(1.26)
where Pin is input power and Pout output power. Power amplifiers can be divided in classes A, B, AB, C, D, and E. Class A uses 100% of the input signal. This amplifier is inefficient and is used for small signals or low power amplification. Class B uses 50% of the input signal. It is more efficient than class A, but subject to signal distortions. Class AB is a combination of class A and class B. It uses more than 50% of the signal. Class C uses less than 50% of the signal. Distortions are high, but so is the efficiency. Class D uses switching (on/off) for high efficiency. It can be used in digital circuits. There are also some other special classes.
1.7
Considerations for Voice Versus Data Input information into the communication system can be voice or data (text, pictures, video, and so forth). In this section just some of the codecs are mentioned. There are many more; some of them are obsolete, while others are being developed. 1.7.1
Text
ASCII uses 7 bits per character. Extended ASCII uses 8 bits per character.
24
Communications Systems Table 1.4
Data Rates for Audio Codecs ADPCM G.711
Sample Rate
8 KHz
8 KHz
8 KHz
Effective Sample Size
8 bits
4 bits
1 bit
Data Rate
1.7.2
G.729a
64 Kbps 32 Kbps 8 Kbps
Images
The Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) (lossless compression) uses 8 bits per pixel and a 256 color palette. The Joint Photographic Exchange Group (JPEG) (lossy compression) format most often uses a 10:1 compression. 1.7.3
Voice
Pulse code modulation (PCM) has 8,000 samples per second—with 8 bits per second it results in 64 Kbits per second. Compression techniques are adaptive differential pulse code modulation (ADPCM) (32 Kbps) and residual excited linear predictive coding (8–16 Kbps). Audio music requires 32–384 Kb/s. The audio signal is sensitive to delay and jitter. Latency is the end-to-end delay from mouth to ear. It must not exceed 100 ms for excellent quality. For acceptable quality it should not exceed 150 ms. For higher delays an echo canceller is required. There is a propagation delay in free space, which depends on the frequency used and the distance between the transmitter and receiver. Packetization delay is the time required to create an audio packet and send it on a network—it depends on the codec. Table 1.4 gives the data rates for some audio codecs. The G.711 codec used in telephony works at 64 Kbps. 1.7.4
Video
H.261 coding uses 176 by 144 or 352 by 258 frames at 10–30 frame/sec. MPEG-2 and HDTV use 1,920 by 1,080 frames at 30 frames/sec.
Selected Bibliography Balanis, C. A., Antenna Theory—Analysis and Design, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. Brown, S., and Z. Vranesic, Fundamentals of Digital Logic with VHDL Design, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001. Couch, L. W., Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001. Dunlop, J., and D. G. Smith, Telecommunication Engineering, London, U.K.: Chapman and Hill, 1994. Diffie, W., and M. E. Hellman, “Privacy and Authentification: An Introduction to Cryptography,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 67, No. 3, March 1979, pp. 397–428. Hanna, S. A., “Convolutional Interleaving for Digital Radio Communications,” Proc. 2nd International Conference on Personal Communications: Gateway to the 21st Century, 1993, Vol. 1, pp. 443–447.
1.7 Considerations for Voice Versus Data
25
Federal Information Processing Standards Publications 197: “Announcing the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips-197.pdf. Gardiol, F. E., Introduction to Microwaves, Dedham, MA: Artech House, 1984. Morelos-Zaragoza, R. H., The Art of Error Correcting Coding, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Sklar, B., Digital Communication: Fundamentals and Applications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001. Xiong, F., Digital Modulation Techniques, Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2000.
CHAPTER 2
Electromagnetic Spectrum Used for Communications 2.1
Electromagnetic Spectrum The electromagnetic (EM) spectrum of an object is the distribution of electromagnetic radiation from that object. The EM spectrum (Figure 2.1) covers frequencies from 3 Hz (ELF) to gamma rays (30 ZHz) and beyond (cosmic rays). The corresponding wavelengths λ can range from thousands of kilometers to a fraction of an atom size (Table 2.1). The frequency and the wavelength are related by the following expression: λ=
c f
(2.1)
where c is the speed of light—approximately 30,000,000 m/s. The energy of the particular range is defined as E = h⋅ f
(2.2)
where f is the frequency in hertz and h is the Planck’s constant, 6.62606896e−34 Js. Energy can be expressed in eV, where 1 eV is approximately 1.60217653e−19 J. One eV is equal to the amount of energy gained by a single unbound electron when it accelerates through an electrostatic potential difference of 1 volt. It is also the energy needed to break the chemical bond in the cell. The higher the frequency, the higher the energy in each photon (Table 2.1). Table 2.2 gives the prefix converters used in Table 2.1. The spectrum is divided in decades. The radio spectrum (including microwaves) is considered to cover frequencies from 9 kHz to 300 GHz, that is, from VLF to SHF. Most communications take place in the radio spectrum, but the infrared and the visible spectrum can be used as well. The use of frequency bands for communication is discussed latter in Sections 2.1.1 to 2.1.13.
27
Electromagnetic Spectrum Used for Communications
ELF SLF ULF VLF
Figure 2.1
Table 2.1
LF MF HF VHF UHF SHF EHF
SOFT
Visible
28
IR
UV
HARD
X-ray
HARD
SOFT
Gamma-ray
Electromagnetic spectrum.
Electromagnetic Spectrum
Range
Frequency
Extremely low frequency (ELF)
Wavelength
Energy (eV) −13
−13
−12
−12
−11
−11
−10
7
7
6
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
6
5
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
5
4
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
4
3
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
3
2
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
2
10 m–10 m
3 Hz–30 Hz
−14
8
Super low frequency (SLF)
30 Hz–300 Hz
10 m–10 m
Ultra low frequency (ULF)
300 Hz–3 kHz
10 m–10 m
Very low frequency (VLF)
3 kHz–30 kHz
10 m–10 m
Low frequency (LF)
30 kHz–300 kHz
10 m–10 m
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
−10
−9
−9
−8
−8
−7
−7
−6
−6
−5
−5
−4
−4
−3
Medium frequency (MF)
300 kHz–3 MHz
10 m–10 m
High frequency (HF)
3 MHz–30 MHz
10 m–10 m
1
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
Very high frequency (VHF)
30 MHz–300 MHz
10 m–1m
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
1
−1
Ultra high frequency (UHF)
300 MHz–3 GHz
1m–10 m
Super high frequency (SHF)
3 GHz–30 GHz
10 m–10 m
Extremely high frequency (EHF) 30 GHz–300 GHz Infrared (IR)
0.3 THz–400 THz
−1
−2
−2
−3
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10 1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10
10 m–10 m −3
1.24 · 10 –1.24 · 10 −9
−3
10 m–750 · 10 m
1.24 · 10 –1.65
−9
−9
Visible
400–790 THz
750 · 10 m–380 · 10 m
Ultraviolet (UV)
750 THz–30 PHz
400 · 10 m–10 · 10 m
X-ray
30 PHz–30 EHz
−9 −9 10 · 10 m–0.01 · 10 m
Gamma ray
30 EHz–30 ZHz
0.01 · 10 m–10 · 10 m
Table 2.2
1.65–3.27
−9
−9
3.10–124 124–124,000
−15
3
0.124–124 · 10
Prefix Converters
Symbol Z
E
Prefix
zetta
Factor
10
2.1.1
−9
21
P
exa 10
18
T
G
M
k
m
peta tera giga mega kilo 10
15
10
12
10
9
10
6
10
3
n
µ
p
f
milli micro nano pico 10
−3
10
−6
10
−9
10
−12
femto 10
−15
Extra Low Frequency (ELF)
Most sources in the ELF band are natural or accidental. However, ELF can be used for submarine communications, since signals with a transmitter power of 100 MW can penetrate up to several hundred meters deep. However, the messages are very short. 2.1.2
Super Low Frequency (SLF)
The SLF band, like ELF, can be used for submarine communications. Unwanted sources can occur from power lines (50 or 60 Hz), which run for kilometers. This signal is called hum. Another natural source example is the interaction of solar wind with the ionosphere.
2.1 Electromagnetic Spectrum
2.1.3
29
Ultra Low Frequencies (ULF)
Along with ELF and SLF, the ULF band can also be used for submarine communications. ULF is used in mines as well. Only slow modulation can be applied (Morse code), limiting the amount of information. If only the phase is required, as is the case with navigation systems, a limited amount of information is not a disadvantage. 2.1.4
Very Low Frequency (VLF)
Similar to ULF, VLF is used for navigation systems and communication over large distances. The information capacity is small with VLF. Communication with submarines is possible only near the surface. Lightning also happens in this band. Frequencies below 9 kHz are not allocated by the International Telecommunication Union and can be used freely for communications in some countries. 2.1.5
Low Frequency (LF)
Communication in this band is possible around the Earth by refraction from the ionosphere and reflection from the Earth’s surface. It can be used for navigation, AM radio, and radio frequency identification (RFID). 2.1.6
Medium Frequency (MF)
Like the LF band, MF can use refraction from the ionosphere—but only at night. It is used for AM radio, amateur radio, and navigation. 2.1.7
High Frequency (HF)
The HF band is also known as the short wave band. It is used for medium- and long-range communications, such as marine and aviation communications, amateur radio, and RFID. More information can be sent in channels in the HF bands than in the previously described bands. 2.1.8
Very High Frequency (VHF)
The VHF band is used for radio (FM) and television at short distances (little more than line of sight (LOS). VHF antennas are usually one quarter or one half wavelength long. VHF can also be used for land mobile communications, radio astronomy, cordless telephones, amateur radio, navigation, satellite communications, and railways. 2.1.9
Ultra High Frequency (UHF)
UHF is used for television, mobile phones, satellites, radar, RFID, the global positioning system (GPS), Bluetooth, WLAN, and so forth. The communication is point-to-point over line-of-sight (LOS). For larger distances, a repeater is necessary.
30
Electromagnetic Spectrum Used for Communications
UHF is strongly affected by rain. The antenna size in this frequency range is about a wavelength. 2.1.10
Super High Frequency (SHF)
SHF is used for satellite communications, microwave links, and radar. It is used for line-of-sight communications. 2.1.11
Extra High Frequency (EHF)
The EHF band is mostly used for satellite communications, but not yet for other types of communications as it is hard to modulate and demodulate high frequencies on the band. 2.1.12
Infrared (IR)
IR is used for short-range wireless communications and in astronomy. Computers, PDAs, and remote controls use Infrared Data Association (IrDA) technology. Devices must be in line-of-sight (LOS) and the data transmitted must be short. 2.1.13
Visible
Optical fiber is suitable for large distances because light propagates with little attenuation. It is used for a large amount of data traffic. Visible light communications (VLC) is a new technology that uses light that is visible to human eyes. It must be line-of-sight and suffers from interference from other light sources.
2.2
Spectrum Division The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the leading United Nations’ agency for information and communication technologies. It has three sectors: radio communications, standardization, and development. ITU manages international radio frequencies, allocating the spectrum and frequencies in order to avoid interference between radio stations of different countries. In recent years, radio communication systems have expanded largely. The radio frequency spectrum is a natural resource, and its allocation has to be planned well ahead. Apart from the traditional division shown in the previous section, there are a number of other divisions, such as radar, satellite, and military frequency band designations, given in Tables 2.3–2.8. The bands for TV receive only (TVRO) are given in Table 2.4. TVRO is a satellite technology for receiving satellite TV programs from fixed service satellites. Military secret radar bands originate from World War II and were used for radars. After the war, the secrecy was lifted. IEEE adopted the codes, and today they are in use in radar, satellite, countermeasures, and terrestrial communications. ITU bands are subbands of military designations.
2.2 Spectrum Division
31 Table 2.3 IEEE Radar Band Designations Bands (According to IEEE Standard 521-2002) Frequency
Wavelength
Band
3–30 MHz
100–10m
HF
30–300 MHz
10–1m
VHF
300–1000 MHz
100–30 cm
UHF
1–2 GHz
30–15 cm
L
2–4 GHz
15–7.5 cm
S
4–8 GHz
7.5–3.75 cm
C
8–12 GHz
3.75–2.50 cm
X
12–18 GHz
2.5–1.67 cm
Ku
18–27 GHz
1.67–1.11 cm
K
27–40 GHz
11.1–7.5 mm
Ka
40–75 GHz
7.5 mm–4 mm
V
75–110 GHz
4 mm–2.73 mm
W
110–300 GHz
2.73 mm–1 mm
mm
300–3,000 GHz
1 mm–100 µm
µm
Table 2.4 Satellite TVRO Band Designations Frequency
Band
1.7–3 GHz
S
3.7–4.2 GHz
C
10.9–11.75 GHz Ku1 11.75–12.5 GHz Ku2(DBS) 12.5–12.75 GHz Ku3 18.0–20.0 GHz
Ka
Table 2.5 Military Electronic Countermeasures Band Designations (NATO) Frequency
Band
30–250 MHz
A
250–500 MHz
B
500–1,000 MHz
C
1–2 GHz
D
2–3 GHz
E
3–4 GHz
F
4–6 GHz
G
6–8 GHz
H
8–10 GHz
I
10–20 GHz
J
20–40 GHz
K
40–60 GHz
L
60–100 GHz
M
32
Electromagnetic Spectrum Used for Communications Table 2.6 (Police)
Traffic Radar Designations
Frequency
Band
2.455 GHz
S
10.525 GHz ± 25 MHz
X
13.450 GHz
Ku
24.125 GHz ± 100 MHz K 24.150 GHz ± 100 MHz
K
33.4–36.0 GHz
Ka
332 THz
IR (Infrared)
Table 2.7
Military Radar
Frequency
Band
3–30 MHz
HF
30–300 MHz
VHF
300–1,000 MHz
UHF
1–2 GHz
L
2–4 GHz
S
4–8 GHz
C
8–12 GHz
X
12–18 GHz
Ku
18–27 GHz
K
27–40 GHz
Ka
40–300 GHz
Mm
Table 2.8
ITU Radar Bands
Frequency
Band
138–144 MHz 216–225 MHz
VHF
420–450 MHz 890 - 942 MHz
UHF
1.215–1.400 GHz
L
2.3–2.5 GHz 2.7–3.7 GHz
S
5.250–5.925 GHz
C
8.500–10.680 GHz
X
13.4–14.0 GHz 15.7–17.7 GHz
Ku
24.05–24.25 GHz
K
33.4–36.0 GHz
Ka
59.0–64.0 GHz
V
76.0–81.0 GHz 92.0–100.0 GHZ
W
126.0–142.0 GHz 144.0–149.0 GHz 231.0–235.0 GHz 238.0–248.0 GHz
mm
2.2 Spectrum Division
33
The selected United States radio frequency allocation from 30 MHz to 300 GHz according to the FCC’s “Online Table of Frequency Allocations,” 47 C.F.R., 2. 106; and the selected European radio frequency allocation from 30 MHz to 300 GHz according to the ERC Report 25, “The European Table of Frequency Allocations and Utilizations in the Frequency Range 9 kHz to 1000 GHz”; are given at the end of this book in the Appendix A.
Selected Bibliography The European Table of Frequency Allocations and Utilizations Covering the Frequency Range 9 kHz to 275 GHz, ERC Report 25, Copenhagen 2004, http://www.erodocdb.dk/docs/doc98/official/pdf/ErcRep025.pdf. “FCC Online Table of Frequency Allocations 47 C.F.R. § 2.106,” Revised on September 23, 2008, http://www.fcc.gov/oet/spectrum/table/fcctable.pdf. Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/.
CHAPTER 3
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems 3.1
Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics This chapter will focus on the free space relations, leading into basic propagation theory. Electromagnetic waves are mostly characterized by their wavelength, as we have seen in Chapter 2. They are also characterized by their frequency and energy. Every electromagnetic source whose characteristics change (oscillate) with time will produce waves with certain properties. An electromagnetic wave is a propagating electromagnetic field through a medium. The speed of the wave depends on the medium through which it propagates. The wave is polarized depending on the orientation of its oscillation. The waves can carry energy from the source into the medium through which they propagate. Radiation is an example of this energy transfer. Electromagnetic waves propagate via reflection, refraction, diffraction, and dispersion. The electromagnetic wave can propagate through different types of mediums: partial conductor, perfect dielectric (insulator), free space, and good conductor. The wave consists of both electric and magnetic fields. The ratio of these two fields (impedance) depends on the losses in the medium. If we are dealing with a partial conductor (i.e., seawater), the wave impedance will be η=
jωµ σ + jωε
(3.1) −7
where σ is the conductivity in S/m, µ is the permeability (4π · 10 H/m), and ε is the permittivity (8.852 · 10−12 F/m) of the medium. The phase velocity, ω equals 2πf, where f is the frequency of the wave. The angle between the electric and magnetic field, θ, is 0º < θ < 45º. The velocity of the wave is obtained from: v=
ω = β
1 2 ⎞ µε ⎛⎜ ⎛ σ⎞ 1 + ⎜ ⎟ + 1⎟ ⎟ ⎝ ωε⎠ 2 ⎜⎝ ⎠
(3.2)
where β = 2π/λ is the phase constant. Wavelength, λ, is calculated from:
35
36
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems
λ=
2π = β
1 2 ⎞ µε ⎛⎜ ⎛ σ⎞ ω 1 + ⎜ ⎟ + 1⎟ ⎟ ⎝ ωε⎠ 2 ⎜⎝ ⎠
(3.3)
When dealing with a perfect dielectric, where the conductivity σ = 0, (3.1) is simplified, the wave impedance becomes η=
µ ∠0º ε
(3.4)
In this case, there is no attenuation of the electric or magnetic component of the electromagnetic wave, and they are in phase all the time, that is, θ = 0°. Phase velocity is equal to v=
ω = β
1
(3.5)
µε
and the wavelength λ=
2π 2π = β ω µε
(3.6)
If the electromagnetic wave propagates through free space, then permeability and permittivity are: µ = µ 0 = 4π ⋅ 10 −7 H m ε = ε 0 = 885 . ⋅ 10 −12 F m
(3.7)
The wave impedance in this case is: η = 120π ≈ 377Ω
(3.8)
and the velocity is equal to the speed of light, that is, v = c ≈ 3 ⋅ 10 8 m s
(3.9)
It is valid for a good conductor: σ >>ωε. Then, the spreading constant γ can be written as: γ = α + jβ
(3.10)
where α is the attenuation constant and β is the phase constant as given before. Both of them are equal to α= β=
ωµσ = 2
πfµσ
(3.11)
3.1 Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics
37
The wave impedance can be written as: η=
ωµ ∠45º σ
(3.12)
The wave entering the conductor is attenuated very fast. The intensity is attenuated with the factor e−αy. Both the electric and magnetic fields are attenuated to the value of 1/e, or 36.8% of the surface value at the depth for which αy = 1. This special value is defined as the skin depth δ and is calculated as δ=
1
(3.13)
πfµσ
In summary, the medium is a good conductor if the loss tangent is large (σ >> ωε). If the loss tangent is very small (σ >> ωε), the medium is a good dielectric. Equations for calculating the attenuation constant, phase constant, and impedance for various medium types are given in Table 3.1. When a wave comes to the border of two mediums, one part will be reflected, and the other part will go through into the second medium. For the electric field in any point, E = E ′ e + jγ l + E ′ e − jγ l =
Eg ⎡ η ⎤ η ⎤ E ⎡ 1 + 1 ⎥ e + jγl + R ⎢1 − 1 ⎥ e − jγl ⎢ 2 ⎣ η2 ⎦ 2 ⎣ η2 ⎦
(3.14)
is valid, where vectors E´ and E´´ represent the components of incident and reflected wave on the border of two mediums, and l is the distance from the border. Therefore, the component of the incident and reflected wave can be written as: E R′ =
ER 2
⎡ η1 ⎤ ⎢1 + η ⎥, ⎣ 2 ⎦
E R′′ =
ER 2
⎡ η1 ⎤ ⎢1 − η ⎥ ⎣ 2 ⎦
(3.15)
where η1 and η2 are the impedances of the medium 1 and 2. The reflection coefficient is obtained from
Table 3.1 Attenuation Constant, Phase Constant, and Impedance for Various Medium Types Medium with Losses
Good Conductor
Good Dielectric
Free Space
Attenuation Constant α
2 ⎤ µε ⎡ ⎛ σ ⎞ ⎢ 1 + ⎜ ⎟ − 1⎥ ⎝ ωe ⎠ 2 ⎢ ⎥⎦ ⎣
ωµσ 2
≈0
0
ω
Phase Constant β
2 ⎤ ωε ⎡ ⎛ σ ⎞ ⎢ 1 + ⎜ ⎟ + 1⎥ ⎝ ωε ⎠ 2 ⎢ ⎥⎦ ⎣
ωµσ 2
ω µε
ω
ω µ0 ε0
Impedance η
jωµ σ + jωε
ωµσ (1 + j ) 2
µ ε
377
38
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems →
E R′′
rR =
→
E R′
=
η 2 − η1 η 2 + η1
(3.16)
and the transmission coefficient from →
rT =
E ′′′ R →
E R′
=
2η 2 η1 + η 2
(3.17)
The vector of the transmitted electric field is equal to the sum of the vector of incident and the reflected wave: →
→
→
E R′′′ = E R′ + E R′′
(3.18)
The power density of the electromagnetic wave is equal to → 2 →
P =
→ 2
E
2η
H cos ϕ =
2
η cos ϕ
(3.19)
where ϕ is the angle between the electric and magnetic field. The free space impedance is equal to η=
Ex Hz
(3.20)
The wave propagates in the z direction, and electric (x) and magnetic (y) components are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of the wave propagation. Power densities are correlated as follows: →
→
→
PR′ = PR′′+ PR′′′
(3.21)
which means that the incident power is divided into reflected and transmitted power. If there is a need to calculate the input impedance on some distance l from the border of two mediums (Figure 3.1), the following expression will be used Z in = Z B = η1
η 2 + jη1 tan β1 l η1 + jη 2 tan β1 l
(3.22)
The input impedance can be solved with the Smith chart as the propagation through the free space can be substituted with the transmission line, or more precisely, on the circle of constant attenuation.
3.1 Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics ε2
39
ε1
A
B
η2
η1
ZB
Figure 3.1
3.1.1
Electromagnetic wave at the border of two mediums.
Smith Chart
Let a load ZR be connected to some voltage source Ug, with inner impedance Zg (Figure 3.2). The line has impedance Z0. From the theory of networks, it is well known that most of the energy from the source will be given to the load if inner source impedance is equal to the load impedance, and both of them are equal to the impedance of the line (Zg = Z0 = ZR). If a load is different on the transmission line (waveguide or cable in real situations) from the line characteristic impedance (usually 50Ω or 75Ω) connected, then not all of the energy from the source will be transmitted to the load. There will be a reflection, which might even damage the source (generator). The aim is to adapt the load to the generator with compensation elements that are either inductive or capacitive in character. In some special cases, only an open or shorted transmission line of a certain length will be sufficient. This will perform the adaptation and then there will be no reflection on the load (usually an antenna) and no return of the power back to the transmitter. The input impedance in the line can be found from the following expression:
ZR
Z0 Z0 Ug
Zin
Figure 3.2
Voltage source Ug, with inner impedance Zg.
40
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems
Z in = Z 0
Z R + jZ 0 tan βl Z 0 + jZ R tan βl
(3.23)
where βl is the electric length of the line. The reflection coefficient, rR, determines how much of the power is reflected on the load: rR =
ZR − Z0 ZR + Z0
(3.24)
The incident and the reflected wave result in the standing wave. The standing wave ratio (SWR or ρ) defines how much a load is adapted to the source: SWR =
Emax 1 + rR = Emin 1 − rR
(3.25)
SWR can also be defined as the ratio of the maximum electric field and minimum electric field. When SWR is equal to 1, it means that the reflection coefficient is equal to 0—which means that we have a perfect match. SWR cannot be smaller than 1. This is the center of the Smith chart (Figure 3.3). In the Smith chart, the upper part represents the inductive character (+j), and the bottom part the capacitive character (−j). The impedance of the short circuit is equal to 0 and can be found at the left side of the chart next to the wavelength of 0λ. The admittance of the short circuit is equal to ∞ and is found at the far right side next to the wavelength of 0.25λ. The open line, in turn, has an impedance of ∞, next to the wavelength of 0.25λ, and the admittance is 0 with the wavelength of 0λ.
+j1 0.125λ
Curve of constant real part
1.0
0 0λ
−j1 0.375λ
The Smith chart.
00 0.25λ
SWR=3
Figure 3.3
3.0
3.1 Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics
41
If the load is reactance, it will be placed on the circle of reactive reactance (or capacitive susceptance) on the top or bottom of the circle, depending on the value. The goal of matching (or adapting) the load is to get it as close as possible to the center of the chart. Usually, the values that are inserted into the chart are divided with characteristic impedance of the line, that is, Y=1/Z0. Moving along the transmission line corresponds to moving along the circle with a center in the center of the Smith chart. This circle is called the circle of constant attenuation and is not drawn in the Smith chart. An individual solving the problem must draw it on his or her own. The circles of the constant real part (0.1, 0.3, . . . 1.0, 3.0, . . . 10.0, . . .) are drawn in the chart; they represent the point in the transmission line and differ only in reactance. The parts of the circles in the upper and lower part, which have a common reactance part (± j) and different real part, are also shown. The matching of the load to the generator impedance can be performed by adding one or more compensation elements, and in some cases with λ/4 transformers. These elements can be open line, short circuited, or have some reactance (C or L). Their purpose is to create a standing wave on the compensation element, so that the reflected wave from the compensation element and the load nullify each other (Figure 3.4). Here, the circulation of the energy is at hand. Theoretically, there are no losses on the transmission line, since we assume that the line itself has no losses. If the load has only resistors (no reactance) and is used at a fixed frequency, λ/4, transformers (Figure 3.5) can be used for impedance matching. The input power (voltage and current are in phase) is equal to the one dissipated on the load: P = U1 I1 = U 2 I 2 = I12 Z ul = I 22 Z R =
U12 U2 = 2 Z ul ZR
(3.26)
The characteristic impedance of the line is calculated from Z0 =
Z in ⋅ Z R
(3.27)
Z0
ZR Z0
Z0
Energy circulation
Figure 3.4
Circulation of the energy on the compensation element.
42
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems I2
I1
U1
U2
λ/4
Zin
Figure 3.5
3.1.2
ZR
A λ/4 transformer.
Snell’s Law of Reflection and Refraction
If the wave is entering from one medium into the other at an angle rather than perpendicular, there will be a transmitted component as well as a reflected component of the incident wave, and their intensities will depend on the angle of incidence. Snell’s law of reflection says that the angle of incidence θi will be equal to the angle of reflection θr, that is, θi = θr
(3.28)
while Snell’s law of refraction says that the angle of refraction (transmitted wave), θt, and the angle of incidence, θi, will be sin θ i = sin θ t
µ2 ε2 µ 1 ε1
(3.29)
Total reflection appears when θt = 90º , which can happen only when a wave travels from an electrically denser medium into a less dense medium. For instance, when the wave from the Teflon ( r = 2,1, µr = 1) enters free space, the critical angle when the total reflection will appear is θ c = sin −1
ε2 = sin −1 ε1
1 = 4364º . 2,1
(3.30)
The electric component of the wave can be vertically or horizontally polarized in regard to the incident plane. If it is vertically polarized (Figure 3.6), it is parallel to the incident plane and the wave will be totally or partially reflected. With horizontal polarization (Figure 3.7), the electric component lies in the incident plane, and with µ1 = µ2, there can be an incident angle where there will be no reflected wave (total transmission). Total transmission exists only when a wave travels from an electrically less dense to an electrically denser medium. This angle is called the Brewster’s angle and is defined as:
3.1 Fundamental Communications System Electromagnetics
43
x 1
H”
2
E” E’” θr
H’”
θt
θl
y
E’ H’
Figure 3.6
Vertical wave polarization.
x 1
2
H” E’” E”
H’”
θr
θt
θl
y
E’ H’
Figure 3.7
Horizontal wave polarization.
θ B = tan −1
ε2 ε1
(3.31)
For instance, when a wave travels from air to glass (εr = 5, µr = 1), the incident wave at which there will be no reflection (total transmission) will be θ B = tan −1
ε2 = tan −1 ε1
5 = 65.91º 1
(3.32)
If the angle of incidence is at an angle other than perpendicular, there are two components of the wave: one which is transmitted, and the other vibrating at the border, so that the following expression cannot be used for the reflection coefficient: rR =
η 2 − η1 η 2 + η1
(3.33)
44
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems
Instead, the following can be used: rR =
Zη2 − Zη1 Zη2 + Zη1
(3.34)
The values Z η are different for vertical and parallel polarization. For vertical polarization, it will be: Zη1 = Zη2
η1 cos θ 1
η2 = cos θ 2
(3.35)
and thus, the reflection coefficient, rR =
Z n2 − Z η 1 Z n2 + Z η 1
=
sin( θ 2 − θ 1 ) sin( θ 2 + θ 1 )
(3.36)
For parallel polarization it will be: Z η 1 = η1 cos θ 1 Z η 2 = η 2 cos θ 2
(3.37)
and the reflection coefficient is rR =
Zη2 − Zη1 Zη2 + Zη1
=−
tan( θ 2 − θ 1 ) tan( θ 2 − θ 1 )
(3.38)
Other types of electromagnetic wave propagation are diffraction and dispersion. Diffraction is the bending of waves around small obstacles and the spreading out of waves past small openings. With dispersion, an electromagnetic wave is separated into components with different wavelengths due to refraction, interference, or diffraction. Diffraction will be covered in more detail in Section 3.2.4.
3.2
Wave Generation and Propagation in Free Space The propagation of electromagnetic waves deals with the way the wave travels from the transmitting antenna to the receiving antenna. The electromagnetic waves can travel through guided structures like transmission lines, waveguides, and free space. This will be the subject of interest in this section. 3.2.1
Maxwell’s Equations
Maxwell’s equations can be written in integral or differential form. Written in integral form they look as follows:
3.2 Wave Generation and Propagation in Free Space
45
q
∫ E ⋅ dA = ε
(3.39)
0
∫ B ⋅ dA = 0 ∫ E ⋅ dl = − ∫ B ⋅ dl = µ
0
i+
(3.40)
dΦ B dt
1 ∂ c 2 ∂t
∫ E ⋅ dA
(3.41)
(3.42)
Written in differential form the equations look as follows: ∇ ⋅D = ρ
(3.43)
∇⋅B = 0
(3.44)
∇×E= −
∂B ∂t
∇×H = J+
∂D ∂t
(3.45)
(3.46)
where E is the electric field strength in V/m; H is the magnetic field strength in A/m; D is the electric flux density in C/m2 (Coulombs); B is the magnetic flux density in Wb/m2 (Webers); J is the conduction current in A/m2; and v is the electric charge density in C/m3. Additional equations describing the relation for the medium are: D = εE
(3.47)
B = µH
(3.48)
J = σE
(3.49)
where ε = ε0εr is the permittivity, µ = µ0µr is the permeability, and σ is the conductivity of the medium. The first Maxwell equation (3.39) is also called Gauss’ law for electricity. It says that the electric flux out of any closed surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed within the surface. In the second (3.40), Gauss’ law for magnetism says that the net magnetic flux out of any closed surface is zero. Equation (3.41), or Faraday’s law of induction, says that the line integral of the electric field around a closed loop is equal to the negative of the rate of magnetic flux change through the area enclosed by the loop. Equation (3.42), or Ampere’s law, says that in the case of a
46
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems
static field, the line integral of the magnetic field around a closed loop is proportional to the electric current through the loop. 3.2.2
Wave Propagation
If it is assumed that the wave propagates in the z direction and the wave is polarized in the x direction, the values of the electric and magnetic field will depend on the distance and time according to: E( z, t ) = E 0 e − αz cos( ωt − βz )a x H( z, t ) =
E 0 − αz e cos(ωt − βz − θ η )a y η
(3.50) (3.51)
where η is the intrinsic impedance of the medium calculated from µ ε
η =
⎛ σ⎞ 4 1+ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ωε⎠
1 4
,
tan 2 θ =
σ , 0 ≤ θ ≤ 45 º ωε
(3.52)
Equations (3.50) and (3.51) show the attenuation of the electromagnetic wave while it propagates through a medium with the factor e az (Figure 3.8). Power density of the electromagnetic wave is P=
E 02 −2 αx e cos θ η a z 2η
(3.53)
In free space the E and H fields are perpendicular to each other and to the direction of wave propagation. The loss of the electromagnetic wave in the z direction happens due to the relative permittivity of the medium. x
E
e−αz
z H
y
Figure 3.8
Components of the electric and magnetic fields in a lossy medium.
3.2 Wave Generation and Propagation in Free Space
3.2.3
47
Wave Polarization
The electric field can have various orientations depending on the transmitting antenna. The polarization is the orientation of the tip of the electric field in a plane perpendicular to the direction of the propagation at some point in space as a function of time. The types of polarization are linear (vertical or horizontal), circular, and elliptic. Under extreme conditions in the atmosphere (e.g., rain), electromagnetic wave depolarization is possible. Depolarization can also happen from reflections. With linear polarization, the orientation of the field is constant in space and time. For a wave traveling in the z direction, the electric field can be written as E = Ex a x + Ey a y
(3.54)
where E x = a cos( ωt − kz + φ a
)
(3.55)
E y = b cos( ωt − kz + φ b )
(3.56)
The trajectory of the electric field vector E will be drawn on the x, y plane. The tip of the electric field vector moves as time goes by. The polarization will be linear when phase angles a and b are equal and the trajectory is a line. The phase difference between the angles must be ∆φ = φ b − φ a = nπ, n = 0, 1, 2, K
(3.57)
Linearly polarized waves can be generated using simple antennas such as dipoles. Figure 3.9 shows the linear polarization. Circular polarization will have different phase angles φa and φb, but the amplitudes a and b will be the same. This results in a circle trajectory. The phase difference between the angles is ⎛1 ⎞ ∆φ = φ b − φ a = ± ⎜ + 2n⎟ π, n = 0, 1, 2, K ⎝2 ⎠
y E
x
Figure 3.9
Linear polarization.
(3.58)
48
Electromagnetic Properties of Communications Systems y
E
Figure 3.10
x
Circular polarization.
Circularly polarized waves can be generated by a helically wound wire antenna or with two linear sources perpendicular to each other. Figure 3.10 shows the circular polarization. Both the linear and circular polarizations are special cases of elliptical polarization. Elliptical polarization will occur when the phase angles φa and φb, as well as the amplitudes a and b, are different. The trajectory in this case is elliptical. The phase difference between the angles is the same as in the circular polarization. Figure 3.11 shows the elliptical polarization. 3.2.4
Fresnel Knife-Edge Diffraction
Diffraction occurs when an electromagnetic wave encounters an obstacle. The wave will bend around the obstacle and continue to spread. If there is no obstacle, the electromagnetic wave will travel in a straight line from the transmitter to the receiver. However, if there are obstacles near the path, they will influence the wave by possible power reduction or phase distortion. Fresnel’s zones are ellipsoids (Figure 3.12) where obstacles can create signals that will be out of phase. The first Fresnel zone creates signals that are 0° to 90° out of phase; the second zone creates signals that are 90° to 270° out of phase; the third zone creates signals that are 270° to 450° out of phase, and so forth. Odd number zones are construcy
E
Figure 3.11
Elliptic polarization.
x
3.2 Wave Generation and Propagation in Free Space
49
Fourth Fresnel zone Third Fresnel zone Second Fresnel zone
T
Figure 3.12
First Fresnel zone
r1 d1
R
d2
Fresnel zones.
tive, since they reinforce the signal, and even numbered zones are destructive, since they destroy the signal. The obstacles in the first zone are potentially the most dangerous ones. The radius r1 of the first Fresnel zone is calculated from r1 =
λd 1 d 2 d1 + d 2
(3.59)
where d1 and d2 are the distance between the obstacle and the transmitter and receiver. The above expression is valid when the distances d1 and d2 are much larger than r1. To achieve communication, it is desirable to have the first Fresnel zone clear of any obstacles—to be more precise 60% of the first Fresnel zone should be clear of obstacles, meaning a radius of 0.6 r1. α1
Figure 5.30
Dielectric resonator.
5.4 Microwave Filters
101
Table 5.1 n
Values of (k0) for TEmn Modes
m 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
3.832
1.841
3.054
4.201
5.317
6.416
7.501
8.578
2
7.016
5.331
6.706
8.015
9.282 10.520
11.735
12.932
3
10.173
8.536
9.969
11.346
12.682 13.987
—
—
4
13.324
—
—
—
—
—
5
6
7
Table 5.2 n
11.706 13.170
Values of (k0) for TMmn Modes
m 0
1
2
3
1
2.405
3.832
5.136
2
5.520
7.016
8.417
3
8.654 10.173 11.620
4
11.792 13.323 14.796
4 6.380
7.588
8.771
9.936 11.086
9.761 11.065 12.339
13.589 14.821
13.015 14.372 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
quality factor can be more than 10,000. Such resonators are used in the frequency range from 300 MHz to 300 GHz. As with the waveguide cavity, the resonant modes are the same as in circular cavity waveguides (TE and TM modes) as shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. The resonant frequency of the desired mode of propagation (TEmn or TMmn) of the dielectric resonator can be calculated from fc =
c ⋅ k0 2π ε r ⋅ a
(5.47)
where c is the speed of light, the values of k0 are taken from Tables 5.1 and 5.2, and a is the radius of the dielectric.
Selected Bibliography Caviacchi, T. J., Digital Signal Processing, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. Douglas, S. C., “Adaptive Filtering,” in Digital Signal Processing, V. K. Madisetti and D. B. Williams, (eds.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1999. Dunlop, J., and D. G. Smith, Telecommunication Engineering, 3rd ed., London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1994. Di Paolo, F., Network and Devices Using Planar Transmission Devices, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. Haykin, S., “Adaptive Systems for Signal Process,” in Advanced Signal Processing Handbook, S. Stergiopoulos, (ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001. “Introduction to Digital Filters,” http://www.dsptutor.freeuk.com/dfilt1.htm. Massara, R.E., et al., “Active Filters,” The Electrical Engineering Handbook, R. C. Dorf (ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. Paul, H., and P. E. Young, Electronic Communication Techniques, New York: Merril Publishing Co., 1985.
102
Filter Interference Control Pozar, D. M., Microwave Engineering, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. Rahman, J., et al., “Filters,” in Measurement, Instrumentation and Sensors Handbook, J. G. Webster, (ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1999. Rosa, A. J., “Filters (Passive),”in Engineering Handbook, R. C. Dorf, (ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. Whitaker, J. C., “Circuit Fundamentals,” in The Resource Handbook of Electronics, J. C. Whitaker, (ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001.
CHAPTER 6
Modulation Techniques 6.1
Signal Processing and Detection At the receiving end of a digital communication system, the decision whether the bit value is 0 or 1 must be made. This decision takes place after the demodulation process and sampling of the waveform. This should be done with as little errors as possible. The errors may come from filtering and noise in the communication signal. The most common noise in the radio channel is the Gaussian or white noise, which is present in every communication signal with the same spectral density from very low frequencies up to 1012 Hz. In a binary channel, the transmitted signal si(t) in the time interval (0, T) will have the following form: ⎧ s (t ) 0 ≤ t ≤ T "1" s i (t ) = ⎨ 1 ⎩ s 2 (t ) 0 ≤ t ≤ T "0"
(6.1)
The received signal, r(t), will be degraded by the noise, n(t), and possibly by the pulse response, hc(t), as r(t ) = s i (t )∗ hc (t ) + n(t ) i = 1, 2, K, M
(6.2)
where n(t) is the mean white noise and * is the convolution operator. If the channel is ideal (i.e., there is no binary transmission distortion), hc(t) will not introduce the degradation, and the receiving signal r(t) can be written as r(t ) = s i (t ) + n(t ) i = 1, 2
0≤ t ≤ T
(6.3)
Figure 6.1 shows the demodulation and detection process at the receiver end. Demodulation determines the waveform, whereas detection is the procedure of determining the meaning of the waveform (i.e., decision making). The frequency downconverter translates the frequency to a lower frequency; then the receiving filter extracts the wanted frequencies and prepares the signal for detection. The filtering in the channel usually leads to intersymbol interference (ISI). This is why the equalizing filter is placed after the receiving filter. The sampling of the waveform is done before the actual detection. The pulse in the baseband is described as z(t ) = a i (t ) + n(t )
(6.4)
103
104
Modulation Techniques White noise
si (t)
r(t)
Detection
Sampling
Demodulation Frequency down-converter
z(T)
Equalization filter
Filter
z(t)
Conversion of waveform into sample
Figure 6.1
Border comparison > 1, correct demodulation is not possible. To determine the modulation index, a modulation trapezoid can be used. The modulation signal is on the horizontal axis and the modulated signal on the vertical axis, as shown in Figure 6.4. The modulation index is calculated as ma =
A−B A+B
(6.16)
Demodulation of AM signals can be done with envelope detection or with synchronous detection. u AM
0
u AM
B
A um
ma 1
108
Modulation Techniques
Envelope detection is the simplest procedure of AM signal demodulation. The envelope amplitude of the modulated signal with modulation index ma ≤ 1 is proportional to the modulation signal. Normally, a peak-amplitude detector or rectifier is used. Figure 6.5 shows the AM demodulation procedure. The diode conducts when the input voltage is higher than the diode cut-in voltage, which can range from 0.2V to 0.7V. The capacitor is used for filtering the demodulated signal. It also increases the efficiency of the demodulator by increasing the peak value of the carrier pulses while the diode is conducting. When the diode is not conducting, the capacitor is holding its charge. Additionally, an amplifier might be added to the demodulator. Demodulation with synchronous or coherent detection requires an additional signal whose frequency and phase match the carrier frequency. They also must be in phase, thus the name coherent. This type of detection is shown in Figure 6.6. The additional signal ua(t) (whose frequency matches the carrier frequency) will have the following form: u a (t ) = U a cos ω c t
(6.17)
Mixing this additional signal with the modulated signal gives u AM (t ) ⋅ u a (t ) = kAM m m ⎡ ⎤ ⋅U cm ⎢cos ω c t + a cos( ω c + ω m )t + a cos( ω c − ω m )t ⎥ 2 2 ⎣ ⎦ ⋅ cos ω c t
Further, it follows that
AM signal
Diode
Demodulated signal
R
Figure 6.5
AM demodulation with envelope detection.
u AM (t)
[u AM (t)xua (t)]
u a (t)
Figure 6.6
C
Synchronous detection.
LPF
[u AM (t)xua (t)]LPF
(6.18)
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
109
⎧1 + m a cos ω m t + ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ 1 u AM (t ) ⋅ u a (t ) = kAM ⋅ U cm ⎨ m a ⎡cos(2 ω c + ω m )t +⎤⎬ t + cos 2 ω 2 ( ) ⎢ ⎥ c ⎪ 2 ⎣cos(2ω c − ω m )t ⎦⎪⎭ ⎩
(6.19)
With the use of a lowpass filter, the components around 2ωc are filtered out:
[u (t ) ⋅ u (t )] AM
6.2.1.2
a
LPF
=
1 kAM ⋅ U cm (1 + m a cos ω m t ) 2
(6.20)
Frequency Modulation (FM)
With frequency modulation, the frequency of the carrier is changed, unlike analog modulation where the amplitude is changed. The most widely known use of FM is in radio station broadcasting. The modulation of frequency happens when the frequency of the carrier is changed according to the modulation signal. The frequency of the modulated signal will be ωFM (t ) = ω c + kf ⋅ u m (t )
(6.21)
If the modulating signal has the cosine form: u m (t ) = U m cos ω m t
(6.22)
then the modulated frequency can be written as ωFM (t ) = ω c + kf ⋅ U m cos ω m t
(6.23)
Factor kf determines the largest frequency change at a certain amplitude of the modulating signal. The largest frequency deviation of the carrier frequency is ∆fFM =
kf ∆ωFM = Um 2π 2π
(6.24)
The carrier frequency of the modulated signal will be f (t )FM = f c + ∆fFM cos ω m t
(6.25)
The waveform of frequency modulation is shown in Figure 6.7. The waveform of the FM signal is determined with ⎡ ⎤ ∆ωFM uFM (t )U cm cos ⎢ω c t + sin ω m t ⎥ = U cm cos ω c t + m f sin ω m t ω ⎣ ⎦ m
[
]
(6.26)
where the modulation index mf is calculated from mf =
kf U m kf U m ∆ωFM ∆f = FM = = ωm fm ωm 2 πf m
(6.27)
110
Modulation Techniques uc Ucm
0
t
um
t
0
u FM Ucm
t
0
Figure 6.7
Frequency modulation waveforms.
The modulation index is therefore the ratio of the frequency deviation and modulating frequency. It can be higher or lower than 1. The modulation index depends on both the frequency and amplitude of the modulating signal. With AM, only the amplitude determines the modulation index. Demodulation of the FM signal is performed with slope detection as shown in Figure 6.8. The slope detector consists of an FM to AM converter and an AM envelope detector (described in Section 6.2.1.1). The first part of the detector is actually a lowpass RC filter whose cutoff frequency is determined from fc =
1 2πRC
(6.28)
and is chosen to be the carrier frequency of the FM signal. The signal is next processed with the envelope detection circuit, as if it were an AM modulated signal.
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
FM signal
111 AM envelope detector
R
Demodulated signal
C
Figure 6.8
6.2.1.3
FM demodulation with slope detection.
Phase Modulation (PM)
Phase modulation, along with frequency modulation, is a form of angle modulation. Here, the phase of a carrier signal is changed depending on the modulating signal. The phase modulation is closely related to the frequency modulation because the frequency cannot be changed without varying the phase. Thus, with phase modulation there is always parasitic frequency modulation and vice versa. The change of the carrier phase is determined with the following expression: ϕFM (t ) = ϕ 0 + kp ⋅ u m (t ) = ϕ 0 + ∆ϕ(t )
(6.29)
Since the relative phase of the carrier signal, ϕ0, does not influence the modulated signal, it can be 0. The angle of sinusoidal function is called the phase of modulated signal and is: Φ PM (t ) = ω c t + kp ⋅ u m (t )
(6.30)
The phase modulated signal can be described as
[
]
u PM (t ) = U m cos ω c t + kp u m (t )
(6.31)
and if the modulating signal has a sinusoidal waveform, u m (t ) = U m sin ω m t
(6.32)
the phase of the modulated signal becomes Φ PM (t ) = ω c t + kp ⋅ U m sin ω m (t ) = ω c t + ∆Φ PM sin ω m (t )
(6.33)
where factor kp determines the largest phase change at some amplitude of the modulating signal. The largest phase shift of the modulated signal is called the phase deviation or ∆ΦPM. This phase deviation is also the modulation index, or m p = ∆Φ PM = kpU m
(6.34)
The same as with frequency modulation, mp can be higher or lower than 1. Figure 6.9 shows the waveforms of the carrier signal, modulating signal, and modulated signal for phase modulation.
112
Modulation Techniques
Figure 6.9
Phase modulation waveforms.
As can be seen, the phase deviation changes with the angle of the modulating signal. It can be positive or negative. Demodulation of PM is performed using frequency coherent demodulation (i.e., using a reference signal with a fixed phase reference). The circuit used is the phase detector, whose principle is beyond the scope of this book. PM has a better demodulated S/N ratio than FM, but since coherent demodulation was not as simple as envelope detection in the past, FM was spread more than PM, especially in broadcasting. Although today this is not a problem anymore, FM still stays more in use than PM. 6.2.2
Digital Modulation
The difference between analog and digital modulations is in the modulating signal, which is analog in analog modulations and digital in digital modulations. The digital modulating signal will be either 0 or 1. The three main types of modulations are amplitude shift keying (ASK), frequency shift keying (FSK), and phase shift keying (PSK). In this chapter, pulse code modulation and quadrature amplitude modulation will also be covered.
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
6.2.2.1
113
Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK)
Amplitude shift keying (ASK) is a modulation method where the amplitude of the analog signal carrier, usually sinusoidal, is changed according to the digital modulating signal. This type of modulation is also called on-off keying (OOK), where the signal exists when the digital modulating signal is equal to 1 and there is no signal when the digital modulating signal is equal to 0. ASK is used in optical communications. The principle of ASK modulation is shown in Figure 6.10. The modulated signal is obtained by modulating the carrier signal having frequency fc with the modulating signal having frequency fm: u ASK (t ) = U cm cos ω c t ⋅
2 ⎡1 2 ⎤ + cos ω m t − cos 3ω m t + K ⎢⎣2 π ⎥⎦ 3π
(6.35)
The ideal ASK signal has an infinite spectrum. It is therefore necessary to shape the modulating pulses. The disadvantage of the ASK modulation is that the ratio S/N does not apply for 1 and 0 of the modulating signal. There is also a large differuc Ucm
t
0
um
1 0
t
u ASK Ucm
0
Figure 6.10
ASK waveforms.
t
114
Modulation Techniques
ence in the power consumption between these two states. Another disadvantage is that the loss of link is read as 0. Since the ASK modulated signal has a very definitive envelope, an envelope detector can be used for the first step in the demodulation process. Further processing is usually required because the shaping of modulating pulses has to be done before transmission in order to limit the frequency bandwidth. 6.2.2.2
Frequency Shift Keying (FSK)
Frequency shift keying is a modulation method where the frequency of the analog signal carrier, usually sinusoidal, is changed discretely according to the digital modulating signal. The simplest FSK modulation is BFSK or binary FSK modulation with two carrier frequencies. Another derivative of FSK is minimum shift keying (MSK) where the modulation index is smallest or 0.5. One type of MSK is called the Gaussian MSK, which is used in mobile telephone standards. The principle of FSK modulation is shown in Figure 6.11. Usually a higher level of the modulating signal is associated with a higher frequency. uc Ucm
t
0
um
1 0
t
u FSK Ucm
0
Figure 6.11
FSK waveforms.
t
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
115
The modulation index is equal to the ratio of frequency deviation ∆f and modulation frequency fm: mF =
∆f fm
(6.36)
where frequency deviation is defined as ∆f =
f1 − f 0 2
(6.37)
and current frequencies of FSK signal being f0 = fc − ∆f and f1 = fc + ∆f , with fc being the carrier frequency. FSK modulation is a nonlinear procedure whose frequency spectrum has many components. It can be obtained with two ASK signals, with carrier frequencies f1 and f2. The ASK modulation is a linear procedure with a much simpler frequency spectrum. If FSK is obtained with two ASK signals, envelope detection can be used for demodulation. In other cases, synchronous or asynchronous demodulation is necessary. Synchronous demodulation of FSK signals is shown in Figure 6.12. As mentioned before, the demodulator requires two local oscillators which generate the carrier frequency and must be synchronized. There are two low pass filters, tuned to f1 and f2. At the end, a decision is made as to which of the two signals is the right one. This type of demodulator actually has two receiving channels. Asynchronous demodulation of the FSK signal is shown in Figure 6.13. Asynchronous demodulation uses the advantage of the fact that the FSK modulation can be achieved with two ASK signals. The FSK signal is separated with band pass filters 1 and 2. The filter outputs can be demodulated like ASK signals with envelope detectors. At the end, the decision is made as to which of the two signals is correct.
FSK signal
LFP
Decision f1 FSK signal
LFP
f2
Figure 6.12
Synchronous demodulation of FSK signals.
Demodulated signal
116
Modulation Techniques FSK signal
BPF 1
Envelope detector
Decision FSK signal
Figure 6.13
6.2.2.3
BPF 2
Demodulated signal
Envelope detector
Asynchronous demodulation of FSK signals.
Phase Shift Keying (PSK)
Phase shift keying is a modulation method where the phase of the analog signal carrier, usually sinusoidal, is changed according to the digital modulating signal. With PSK the relative phase of the modulated signal can have two or more different phases from the previously defined set of phases. The waveforms of PSK are shown in Figure 6.14. uc Ucm
0
t
um
1 0
t
u PSK Ucm
0
Figure 6.14
PSK waveforms.
t
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
117
The PSK modulation can also be obtained from two ASK signals, just like the FSK modulation. The difference is that with PSK these two signals must be in a quadrature relation. The PSK signal will be u PSK (t ) = U cm cos( ω c t + ϕ m ) = U cm [cos ϕ m ⋅ cos ω c t − sin ϕ m ⋅ sin ω c t ]
(6.38)
where ϕm is the modulating phase obtained from ϕm =
π(2n + c ) M
, n = 0, 1, 2, K, M − 1; c = 0, 1
(6.39)
For M = 2, and c = 0, the modulating phases can be ϕm = 0, π, and for c = 1, another set of modulating phases will be ϕm = π/2, (3π)/2. This modulation is called BPSK or binary phase shift keying. Usually phase 0π or 0° is dedicated to state 1 and π or 180° to binary state 0. Their relation is shown in Figure 6.15. BPSK modulation is very resilient to interference, but its spectral efficiency is not very high. It is possible to use a set of phases much higher than M = 2. For M = 4, there will be four different phases. This type of PSK modulation is called QPSK. The possible set of phases will be for c = 0, ϕm = 0, π/2, π, 3π/2, and for c = 1, ϕm = ±π/4, ±, 3π/4. With QPSK, there will be two bits necessary for each state instead of one bit for BPSK. This requires more memory and increases the possibility of error compared to BPSK. The spectral efficiency of QPSK is increased compared to BPSK, which means that the amount of information that can be carried in a communication channel is doubled. QPSK phases are shown in Figure 6.16. Each state is assigned binary digits according to the Gray code where the neighboring states differ only by one digit. The QPSK signal can be described with uQPSK (t ) = I(t ) cos ω c t − Q(t ) sin ω c t
(6.40)
The QPSK signal can be achieved by combining two BPSK signals. There are other types of PSK modulations with a higher number of phases (8, 16, ...). However, by increasing the number of phases, the possibility of error also increases, since the phases are coming closer to each other. This can be compensated Q
Figure 6.15
“0”
“1”
180°
0°
BPSK phases in I-Q plane.
I
118
Modulation Techniques Q
01
11
I
00
Figure 6.16
10
QPSK phases in I-Q plane.
for by increasing the power; however, in some cases this is not possible because of international power levels according to standard regulations. PSK modulated signals cannot be demodulated using envelope detection. Demodulation is possible only with synchronous demodulation, which means that the receiver will have to include a referent signal, which will provide the signal on the carrier frequency. The quadrature demodulator shown in Figure 6.17 is used for demodulating PSK signals (i.e., for obtaining I and Q components). 6.2.2.4
Pulse Code Modulation (PCM)
Pulse code modulation is a process where the amplitude of an analog signal is sampled and quantized into a binary code. The principle is given in Figure 6.18. PCM requires analog-to-digital conversion (ADC). The sampling rate of an analog signal must be at least twice the frequency of an analog signal, that is f s ≥ 2f c
FSK signal
(6.41)
LFP
Decision f1 FSK signal
LFP
f2
Figure 6.17
Quadrature demodulator.
Demodulated signal
6.2 Modulation and Demodulation
119
uc
0
t
um 1 0
t
u PCM 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Figure 6.18
111 110 101 100 011 010 001 000
PCM modulation.
The level of quantization will determine how closely the analog signal is sampled. More levels will result in a closer resemblance of the sampled and quantized signal to the analog signal, but will require more processor memory. The demodulator works in a similar way. It takes the numbers (bits) and assigns them the analog voltage accordingly. The receiver will require an analog-to-digital conversion (DAC) circuit to perform this operation. 6.2.2.5
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)
The quadrature amplitude modulation is a process where the amplitude of two carriers is changed. The two carriers are usually sinusoidal and have a phase difference of 90°. QAM can be either analog or digital. The analog QAM works similar to AM. The difference is that QAM uses two carriers instead of one, which both have the same frequency, but their phase difference is 90°. They are modulated with two different modulating signals and then combined before transmission. The QAM signal has the following form: uQAM − u m1 (t ) cos ω c t + u m 2 (t ) sin ω c t
(6.42)
Modulation changes the amplitude of carrier signals, but not the phase difference between them. Analog QAM is demodulated using synchronous detection. Digital QAM is used more than analog QAM, so it is enough to call it just QAM. Digital QAM has two modulating signals, I(t) and Q(t), whose relation is as follows uQAM I(t ) cos ω c t − Q(t ) sin ω c t
(6.43)
120
Modulation Techniques Q
Q
I
8-QAM
Figure 6.19
I
8-PSK
8-QAM and 8-PSK modulations.
PSK is actually a special case of QAM. The difference is that QPSK has no amplitude modulation while QAM has. QPSK has a constant amplitude. Depending on the quantization level, QAM can be 4 QAM, 16 QAM, 64 QAM, and so forth. Figure 6.19 shows the 8-QAM and 8-PSK states. The more states there are, the higher the possibility of error.
6.3
Control of System Drift If there is a difference between the carrier frequency in the transmitter and the carrier frequency in the receiver (which is necessary for the synchronous demodulator), a frequency offset will occur. ∆f = f cr − f ct
(6.44)
International standards require that the frequency offset be kept under a certain level. For example, for the HIPERLAN/2 transmitter carrier frequency fc, the ratio ∆f/fc must be less than 0.002%. If the same demand were required for the receiver, ∆f/fc would need to be 250 kHz. This means that the majority of the power from the transmitted subcarrier will be received in the neighboring channel, which will lead to a large bit error rate (BER). The frequency offset must be measured in the receiver system and corrected. This can be done with a voltage controlled oscillator and phase-locked loop.
Selected Bibliography ETSI EN 300 910 V.8.5.1. (2000-11), Digital Cellular Telecommunications System, (Phase 2+); Radio transmission and reception (GSM 05.05 version 8.5.1 Release 1999) Feher, K., Wireless Digital Communications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995. Modlic, B., and I. Modlic, Modulacije i modulatori, Skolska knjiga Zagreb, 1995. Sklar, B., Digital Communications—Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001.
6.3 Control of System Drift
121
Van Hoesel, L. F. W., et al., “Frequency Offset Correction in a Software Defined Hiperlan/2 Demodulator Using Preamble Section A,” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mobile Multimedia Systems & Applications, Delft, the Netherlands, December 6, 2002, pp.51–62. Xiong, F., Digital Modulation Techniques, Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2000.
CHAPTER 7
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire 7.1
Field-to-Wire Coupling Every wire that acts as a conductor carries charge. When a wire is placed in the electromagnetic field, it will be under its influence. This influence will depend on the type of wire, the intensity of the field, and the quality of the shield. If a conductor is used for carrying information, a foreign electromagnetic field may cause errors in the receiving system. Any cable can also act as an antenna (i.e., it can radiate or receive unwanted interfering signals). The flow of the current largely depends on the frequency. As the frequency increases, the current tends to flow more closely to the surface due to the skin effect. The resistance R of the wire depends on the length, l, cross-section, S, and resistivity of the material, ρ: R= ρ
1 S
(7.1)
The resistivity of some materials is given in Table 7.1. 7.1.1
Skin Effect
At high frequencies the resistance is not the same as it is on DC current. The surface resistivity of the wire dependant on the frequency can be calculated from Rs =
πfµρ =
ρ 1 = δσ δ
(7.2)
where f is the frequency, µ is the permeability of the wire, and ρ is the resistivity 1 ( ρ = , with σ being the conductivity and δ being the skin depth). The higher the freσ quency, the smaller the skin depth—and the resistivity increases. This is shown in Figure 7.1. The current flows only in the dashed area. At DC, the wire cross-section is used for the current flow. At higher frequencies, the current tends to stay closer to the surface. At RF frequencies, the current is concentrated only at the surface and the penetration depth is very small. This characteristic is used for building shields from electric fields. The AC resistance can be written as
123
124
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire Table 7.1 Resistivity of Different Materials at 20° Conductor
Resistivity (n m)
Aluminum
28.2
Copper
17.2
Gold
24.4
Iron
97.1
Platinum
106
Lead
220
Silver
15.9
Zinc
58
Semiconductor Resistivity (m m) Carbon
0.015
Germanium
460
Silicon
250,000
Insulator
Resistivity (T m)
Glass
0.01–100
Rubber
10–10,000
Wood
0.01
δ r r´
DC
Figure 7.1
HF
Skin effect.
R= ρ
1 S ef
(7.3)
where the effective area, Sef, is obtained by S ef = πr 2 − πr ′ 2 = πr 2 − π( r − δ)
2
(7.4)
Further analysis gives
(
S ef = π r 2 − r 2 + 2 rδ − δ 2
) = π(2rδ − δ ) 2
(7.5)
The resistance of a conductor at radio frequencies will then be R= ρ
1
[π(2rδ − δ )] 2
(7.6)
7.1 Field-to-Wire Coupling
125
The resistance of a copper wire (1m long, 1.5 mm in diameter) at different frequencies is shown in Figure 7.2. It can be seen that the resistance rises quite fast with the frequency. At 200 MHz all of the current will flow in about 5 outer micrometers of the cable. As frequencies increase, cables have difficulty carrying the signals properly. Additionally, it is difficult to prevent them from leaking. Regarding EMC problems, nonmetallic conductors—which include wireless, fiber-optic, microwave, or laser links—are better for carrying signals. Coupling paths between transmitters and receivers can be either radiated or conductive and include antenna-to-antenna coupling, cable-to-cable coupling, antenna-to-wire (cable) coupling, or cable-to-antenna coupling as shown in Figure 7.3. Crosstalk or cable-to-cable coupling depends on frequency and bandwidth. 7.1.2
Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP)
When current flows through the wire, electromagnetic radiation is inevitable. When two cables (forward and return) are needed, it is possible to twist them into a 0.9
Resistance (ohms)
0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0
Figure 7.2
1
2
5
10 20 f (MHz)
Resistance of 1-m-long copper wire versus frequency.
T
Transmitter equipment
Radiated coupling
Coupling paths.
R
Receiver equipment
Signal line Conducted coupling
Figure 7.3
50
100
200
126
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
twisted pair for the cancellation of electromagnetic interference. This old technique is called UTP or unshielded twisted pair. Here, the signals flowing in a pair have opposite directions and the fields tend to cancel each other out. This solution can sometimes effectively cancel crosstalk between neighboring pairs. This method has been used for telephone lines for many years now. An unshielded twisted pair usually comes in two colors (Figure 7.4). It is used for the Internet, telephone cables, and video. There are usually between 4 to 25 pairs inside a sheath. While the UTP cable has no shield, there are other designs of wires with shielding, which will be covered in Section 7.4.3. Whether the conductors are used inside or outside a certain electronic device will determine the type of wire used. If used inside a product with a good shield, the choice of wire is not so important in regards to interference, although signal performance might be of interest. It would be best not to have internal cables at all, and instead have PCB traces. This simplifies the shielding and reduces its cost. If conductors are used outside of an electronic device, a shield of any sort is desirable regardless of whether the communication is analog or digital. 7.1.3
Ferrite Filter
Filtering the signals with ferrite filters (Figure 7.5) can sometimes help protect against interference. A ferrite filter can, if properly used, suppress interference. It is possible to use an in-line filter or onboard suppression circuits, but they are usually more expensive solutions. Ferrites have a concentrated homogenous magnetic structure with high permeability. Their characteristics do not change with time and temperature, and their application depends on the frequency of use. Prior to the usage of a ferrite filter, the cable impedance has to be known. It is usually 50Ω, but it can also vary from a few ohms to several hundreds of ohms. Ferrite impedance depends on dimensions (length, outer and inner diameter). The most important thing to have in mind is that the ferrite diameter should be as close to the wire diameter as possible.
Isolation 4 pairs UTP
Sheath
Figure 7.4
Unshielded twisted pair (UTP).
Conductor
7.1 Field-to-Wire Coupling
127
Connector
Ferrite filter
Cable
Figure 7.5
Ferrite filter.
The insertion loss (a measure of the filter effectiveness at a certain frequency), which is usually described as the ratio of voltage with and without a filter, can be calculated from Insertion loss = 20 log10
ZC + ZF ZC
(7.7)
where ZC is the circuit impedance and ZF is the ferrite impedance. If, for instance, circuit impedance is 50Ω and ferrite impedance at 40 MHz is 100Ω, the insertion loss will be 9.5 dB. If circuit impedance is 75Ω instead of 50Ω, the insertion loss will be 7.4 dB. This means that the insertion loss will be higher when the circuit impedance is lower. The effectiveness of the ferrite can be enhanced if cable or wire is passed through the ferrite more than once. The ferrite impedance, ZF, increases geometrically with the number of loops (Figure 7.6). For two loops, the ferrite impedance is four times bigger. The disadvantage of multiple loops is that the frequency band of ferrite becomes narrower. If, for the previous example, there are two loops instead of one, ferrite
Figure 7.6
Multiloop ferrite.
128
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
impedance ZF will be 400Ω at 40 MHz. The insertion loss in this case will be 19.1 dB and for three loops it will be 25.6 dB. Ferrite placement is also important. It is best to place the ferrite close to the end of cable where it leaves the electronic equipment. If the cable connects two pieces of the electronic equipment, two ferrites might be necessary. Large ferrites generally have higher impedance, but since their size increases the total weight and space, this has to be kept in mind when choosing the ferrite. Filtering only attenuates the interfering signals—it does not remove them. For some cases, cable shielding is necessary. The coupling to wires can be either capacitive (electric field) or inductive (magnetic field).
7.2
Electric Field Coupling to Wires An electric field can be coupled to wire by stray capacitance. Figure 7.7 shows how an electric field is coupled into a wire (circuit) carrying the useful signal. This electric field can come from several sources such as another parallel cable or circuit, or from the electric field of an antenna. An interfering electric field is coupled through stray capacitance in an equivalent circuit, as shown at the bottom of Figure 7.7. The signal source impedance, RS, and load impedance, RL, are the same. The useful signal is characterized with VS, and the source of noise, VN, is coupled via stray capacitance, CN. Stray capacitance occurs when two conductors are close to each other and there is no shield or grounding present. It usually occurs between parallel traces on a PC board. Bad planning can lead to lower stability, greater noise, and reduced frequency response. The stray capacitance is proportional to the area of interlap, S, and inversely proportional to the distance between two circuits, d, as: C = ε0 εr
S d
(7.8)
Increasing the distance or minimizing the overlap will minimize the capacitance and thus the coupling of noise into the signal. The coupling also depends on noise level, frequency, and load impedance. Coupled voltage, VC, will be equal to VC = VN
RL RL +
(7.9)
1 ωC N
Capacitive coupling will be smaller for lower values of noise voltage, frequency, and circuit impedance. The voltage induced on a wire from the electric field using Faraday’s law is: Vi =
r
r
∫ E ⋅ dl C
=−
d dt
r
r
∫ ∫ B ⋅ ds S
(7.10)
7.2 Electric Field Coupling to Wires
129 E-field
VS RL
RS
h
l
CN
VN
VS RL
RS
Figure 7.7
Capacitive coupling.
r r where E is the electric field intensity vector and B is the magnetic flux density vector. The above expression can be simplified to ⎛ βl ⎞ Vi = 2 Eh sin ⎜ ⎟ ⎝2⎠
(7.11)
where h and l from Figure 7.7 define the loop area. If the phase constant β = 2π/λ is introduced in the above expression, the equation for induced voltage is obtained: ⎛ πl ⎞ Vi = 2 Eh sin ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ λ⎠
(7.12)
For low frequencies, where wire length l is short relative to the wavelength (l < λ/2), sinx = x, in which case the above expression becomes Vi = 2πlh E λ
(7.13)
Above a frequency at which l = λ/2, (7.13) can be simplified: Vi = πhE
(7.14)
130
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
This is a high-frequency asymptote, overinduced voltage at all frequencies above the one where l = λ/2. If, for example, we take a case with l = 1m and h = 0.5 cm, the normalized electric field-to-wire coupling, Vi /E will depend on the frequency as shown in Figure 7.8. The dashed line shows the approximation for low and high frequencies discussed above. The maximums of the coupling will appear when f =
(2n + 1)c 2l
, n = 0, 1, 2, K
(7.15)
and the minimums will appear when f =
nc , n = 0, 1, 2, K l
(7.16)
where c is the speed of light. Electric fields can be coupled using common mode coupling or differential mode coupling. With common mode coupling the currents in cables run in the same direction, while with differential mode coupling the currents run in opposite directions. Both examples are shown in Figure 7.9. 0 −10
Vi /E
−20 −30 −40 −50 −60
Figure 7.8
Figure 7.9
10
1
f (MHz)
100
1000
Electromagnetic field-to-wire coupling versus frequency.
ic
id
ic
id
Common mode coupling and differential mode coupling.
7.3 Magnetic Field Coupling to Wires
7.3
131
Magnetic Field Coupling to Wires If current is flowing through a wire it will create a magnetic field around the wire. The magnetic field creates an electric field perpendicular to the magnetic field. This electric field can cause a current flow in the wire in its vicinity. This characteristic of mutual inductance is the basis of how transformers actually operate. Magnetic coupling of interference is unwanted inductive coupling from one loop to another. Typical noise sources are motors, transformers, relays, and so forth. Inductive coupling is the result of a magnetic field in the area enclosed by the signal circuit loop. The magnetic field is generated from the current flowing in the adjacent noise circuit as shown in Figure 7.10. The induced voltage VN in the signal circuit is calculated from: VN = 2 fBS cos ϕ
(7.17)
IN VN R
VS RL
RS
IN VN R
M VS
RS
Figure 7.10
Inductive coupling.
RL
132
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
where f is the frequency of the noise signal, B is the magnetic flux density, S is the area of the signal circuit loop, and ϕ is the angle between the flux density, B, and the area, S. The induced voltage according to the equivalent circuit shown at the bottom of Figure 7.10 is VN = 2 fMI N
(7.18)
where IN is the current value in the noise circuit. Mutual inductance, M, is proportional to the area of the receiver circuit loop, frequency of the source, and current level of the source, and is inversely proportional to the distance between the signal and loop circuit. Thus, the coupling can be minimized by separating these two circuits. The coupling can also be minimized by lowering the frequency and current of the noise circuit or twisting the wires of the noise source. Twisting the wires reduces the circuit loop area, S. Finally, magnetic shielding of both the noise circuit as well as the signal circuit can further lower the magnetic (inductive) coupling. The ratio of noise voltage to signal voltage is lowest when the circuit impedance is highest. This condition is exactly the opposite for the case of minimum electric field coupling for the lowest circuit impedance. There is an optimum circuit impedance where the overall coupling will be the smallest.
7.4
Cable Shielding Cable shielding is a procedure of protecting the wires (conductors), which are carrying information or are used as power lines, with an outer protective layer. The shield protects the wire from the electric field coming from the noise source and at the same time protects the surrounding electronic equipment or other cables from the wire’s own electromagnetic radiation. In Section 7.1.2 the twisted pair was mentioned as a method for protection of the wire from unwanted electromagnetic coupling. In some cases this is not sufficient. An additional metal shield provides better noise suppression. The parasite, or stray capacitance, CN, can be reduced by applying the capacitive shielding. The coaxial cable is a good example of this method. The idea is to provide another path for the induced current rather than the wire carrying the signal. The shield is placed between the capacitively coupled conductors and connected to the ground only at the source end. If the shield is connected to the ground at both ends, a large ground current may exist, so this is generally not recommended. If a cable shield is thick (several skin depths), and has no holes in it, it will have a shielding effectiveness (SE) above 200 dB. Shielding effectiveness will be discussed in depth in Chapter 8. The conducted currents flowing on the surface of the shield will not penetrate the shield and interfere with the wires inside, which carry useful signals. This type of shield does not require grounding at all. If, on the other hand, the shield is thin (less than skin deep) and leaky (i.e., with holes), the absorption loss will be small. There will only be the reflection loss of the shield; the holes might further lessen the reflection loss. The only protection this
7.4 Cable Shielding
133
shield can give to the cable would occur if it were grounded. In this case it must be connected to the closest metal reference to form a Faraday cage. If the interfering noise field is uniform, it does not matter which end of the shield is grounded. In other cases, it is better to ground the end closer to the interfering noise source. Grounding the shield at both ends generally is not a good idea because this will create a new ground loop, resulting in an even greater surface current. Since the shield has holes, the greater surface current would induce high voltages in internal wires. Thus, if a bad cable shield is used, grounding only one end is desirable. 7.4.1
Tri-Axial Cable
Shielding cables differentiates shielding and the screening. Screening is actually shielding more wire pairs and not just one pair. Usually more screening and shielding will raise the cable cost. The cable screen should cover the entire length of cable with 360° coverage. The screen (shield) carries both the return signal and external interference on opposite sides of the cable (due to the skin-depth effect), which is possible for solid copper screens. Flexible screened cables cannot keep the two currents separated, so the return currents leak out and the interfering currents leak in. The solution for this problem is a tri-axial cable shown in Figure 7.11. A tri-axial cable is quite similar to the coaxial cable, except with the addition of one more shield. One center conductor is surrounded by two shield layers insulated from each other. Usually the outer shield is grounded and the inner shield is used for the return signal. The shielding properties of such a cable are better than those for a simple coaxial cable. The outer shield lowers the ground loop interference and eliminates the radiated noise or crosstalk. 7.4.2
Cable Termination
The shield, as mentioned before, must be terminated (or matched). Cable screens should always be connected to their enclosure shield, and should be terminated in 360° to the skin of the screened enclosure they are going into. The choice of the connector at the end of the cable is essential. The most common connection is the pigtail connection. It is the connection where the screen is brought down to a single wire and extended through a connector pin to the ground point. It is easy to assemble. At high frequencies this connection
Foil shield
Copper shield
Copper conductor
Dielectric insulator
Figure 7.11
Tri-axial cable.
Plastic coating
134
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
becomes inappropriate because of its inductance, which is serially connected to the cable screen. The inductance will introduce a voltage when interference currents flow along the screen to the ground. This voltage can be coupled from the screen into the inner conductors. The same goes for the emission of radiation from the inner conductors to the ambient area. The impedance of such a connection increases with the frequency and may completely degrade the use of a good cable screen. The pigtail connection should be avoided at frequencies above 10 MHz if possible, or kept very short. A much better solution is crimping and employing backshell in combination with stress relief bolts as shown in Figure 7.12. Connector backshells can be potted and molded. Even the best cable shield will be useless if the bonding to the connector is done poorly. Some sort of enclosure shielding at the end of the cable is always necessary, especially at higher frequencies. 7.4.3
Shielded Twisted Pair Cables
The previously mentioned unshielded twisted pair (UTP), which is the most simple and cheapest cable available, is sometimes not appropriate because of its lack of shielding. There are other types of twisted pairs with screening and shielding. The shielding can be applied to individual pairs or several pairs in a cable. The first considered is the screened unshielded twisted pair (S/UTP). The S/UTP cable is a screened UTP cable, which means that it has a single shield beneath the sheath for all of the twisted pairs together as shown in Figure 7.13. Since the shield is a metal foil, it is sometimes called the foiled twisted pair (FTP). The next type of shielded twisted pair is the shielded twisted pair (STP), which has metal shielding over each individual pair of wires instead of just one shield for all the twisted pairs together like S/UTP. It provides better protection from electromagnetic interference and prevents crosstalk between the pairs as well. The cross-section of STP is shown in Figure 7.14. The last shielded cable considered is the screened shielded twisted pair (S/STP), also known as the screened fully shielded twisted pair (S/FTP) cable. This cable has shielding of the pairs as well as a shield beneath the sheath. It has the best protection from interference of all the cables mentioned in this section. The cross-section is shown in Figure 7.15. Backshell
Cable Stress relief bolts
Figure 7.12
Bonding cable to connector.
Connector
7.4 Cable Shielding
135
Sheath
Conductor Insulator Screen
Pair
Figure 7.13
Screened unshielded twisted pair (S/UTP) cable.
Pair shield Sheath
Conductor Insulator
Figure 7.14
Shielded twisted pair (STP).
136
Electromagnetic Field Coupling to Wire
Pair shield Sheath
Conductor Insulator Screen
Figure 7.15
Screened shielded twisted pair (S/STP).
Selected Bibliography “Crimping, Interconnecting Cables, Harnesses, and Wiring,” NASA-STD-8739.4, February 1998, http://snebulos.mit.edu/projects/reference/nasa-generic/nasa-std-8739-4.pdf. EMC and Compliance Yearbook 2003, CD-ROM, Nutwood UK Ltd, Eddystone Court, De Lank Lane, St Breward, Bodmin, Cornwall, PL30 4NQ, United Kingdom. Javor, K., “On Field-to-Wire Coupling Versus Conducted Injection Techniques,” Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 18–22, 1997, Austin, TX, pp. 479–487. Martin, L., and A. Kamiens, “Magnetic Shielding Theory and Practice,” ITEM 2001, pp. 1–3. May, J., “Filtering Out Interference Signals with Cable Ferrites,” Compliance Engineering Magazine, November 2002. Trout, D., “Investigation of the Bulk Current Injection Technique by Comparison to Induced Currents from Radiated Electromagnetic Fields,” 1996 IEEE EMC Symposium, Santa Clara, CA, 1996, pp. 412–417. Worshevsky, A., and R. Patlaty, “Low Frequency Common Mode Voltages in Electrical Cable Runs,” Proceedings of IEEE 6th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electromagnetic Ecology, June 21–24, 2005, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 224–225.
CHAPTER 8
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling 8.1
Field-to-Aperture Coupling The aperture is a hole or an opening in an enclosure of an electronic device through which electromagnetic fields may enter or leak out. Since immunity of an electronic device is defined as its resistance to ambient electromagnetic fields, any holes or apertures in the shielding may compromise the operation of such a device. At the same time, other electronic devices in the vicinity of the above mentioned electronic device, which has holes or apertures in its shield, will be in danger from its emissions. The example of this is shown in Figure 8.1. Electronic device emissions are not a problem if they are kept below levels prescribed by international standards. Most of the emissions will stay inside the shield and diminish with multiple reflections. Some emissions may leak out from the shield and reach other electronic equipment in the vicinity. A shield aperture can be potentially dangerous to other electronic equipment as shown in Figure 8.1(a). Similarly, the aperture in the shield can leak in the electromagnetic radiation. The shield provides good protection from most of the ambient radiation, but some might still penetrate the shield, as shown in Figure 8.1(b). Some of the radiation that enters the shield will be lessened through multiple reflections (and absorptions) from the shield, but not all. The best shield will be the one without any holes or apertures; no electromagnetic fields can enter the shield and interfere with the electronic equipment. Also, this kind of equipment will not produce any ambient fields, provided that the shield is designed in such a way as to protect from both the electric and magnetic fields. This type of shield would be beneficial even though it is impossible to achieve total shielding against electric or magnetic fields; however, such a shield is impractical. This is because there has to be some sort of power cord going in or out of the shield. Also, apertures for ventilation, sensors, antennas, and connectors to other equipment all must be taken into consideration. These are just some of the reasons why a perfect shield is impossible to achieve. Since the apertures in the shield cannot be avoided, there are still methods available to keep the influences of these apertures on the shield effectiveness at a minimum.
137
138
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling Emission
Immunity
(a)
Figure 8.1
8.1.1
(b)
(a) Emission and (b) immunity depend on the shield apertures.
Shielding Effectiveness (SE)
Apertures in a metal shield can be considered as half-wave resonant slot antennas. This means that the geometrical dimensions of the apertures will determine which frequencies can travel through the slot or aperture and which cannot. If there is only one aperture in the shield, the shielding effectiveness (SE) can be obtained from ⎛ λ⎞ SE = 20 log10 ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ 2d ⎠
(8.1)
where λ is the wavelength and d is the maximum dimension of the aperture (diagonal). Thus, for a desired SE, there is a maximum aperture, with the largest d allowed for a given frequency: d ( mm) =
150 f ( MHz )
(8.2)
Figure 8.2 shows the maximum allowable aperture diameter d for SE = 60 dB. For 1 MHz this value is 150 mm, and it becomes smaller, reaching only 0.15 mm for 1 GHz. 8.1.2
Multiple Apertures
It is much better to have several smaller apertures than one large one, if possible. Induced currents (from the magnetic field) in the shield will flow as long as there is no obstruction in their path. Currents flowing in a shield coming to an aperture will create the magnetic fields. There will be a voltage difference on the aperture sides, Aperture dimensions for SE = 60 dB
d (mm)
150 100 50 0
Figure 8.2
1
10
Aperture dimensions for SE = 60 dB.
f (MHz)
100
1000
8.1 Field-to-Aperture Coupling
139
which will result in an electric field. It is desirable that the apertures interfere with those currents as little as possible, as can be seen from Figure 8.3. As can be seen in Figure 8.3, smaller apertures will not stop the currents as much as a large one will. The resonant frequency of the smaller aperture will be much higher than that of the larger aperture. Since every aperture in the shield lessens its effectiveness, the shielding effectiveness of multiple apertures is degraded compared to a single aperture by 20logn, where n is the number of apertures. That means that two apertures will degrade the shield by 6 dB, four apertures by 12 dB, and so forth. This works only up to the point where the wavelength becomes comparable with the size of the small aperture arrays, or in the case when the apertures are not close to each other compared to the wavelength. If the apertures are placed at a distance more than half of a wavelength apart, they can be considered individual apertures. At a frequency of 1 GHz, half of a wavelength will be 15 cm. The smaller the aperture, the less the electromagnetic fields penetrate inside the shield. This is shown in the Figure 8.4. The electromagnetic field will not penetrate very deep if the aperture dimension is small compared to the wavelength. The effectiveness of the shield at the distance l from the shield, depending on the diameter d of the aperture, will be 1 ≈1 d 1 40 dB if ≈ 2 d 1 60 dB if ≈ 5 d 20 dB if
where λ > d. The rule of thumb is that d/ ≤ 30. For the frequency f = 1 GHz or λ = 30 cm, d can be 1 cm at most. According to the above rule, the shielding effectiveness of 60 dB will be achieved at the distance of l = 5 cm from the aperture.
One large aperture
Several smaller apertures
Figure 8.3
Multiple aperture currents.
Figure 8.4
Penetration of the electromagnetic field through the apertures.
140
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling
The above rules are only an approximation. In reality they will depend on the thickness of the shield, the type of the material used, and on the distance of the inner cables or wires to the shield aperture. It is recommended to have an additional shielding effectiveness of 20 dB. 8.1.3
Waveguides Below Cutoff
When the aperture dimension becomes too small, waveguides below the cutoff frequency should be used (Figure 8.5). There can be just one or multiple waveguides forming the honeycomb. They are often used for ventilation. Placing waveguides inside the aperture holes can reduce the emission of the waves through the aperture. Multiple reflections inside the waveguide’s walls will reduce wave strength. The size of the aperture can be much larger when using waveguides below cutoff than when not using them. The characteristics of the waveguide are determined by its geometrical dimensions: gap (g) and height (h). A waveguide will allow all the waves to pass when its internal diagonal (g) is half of the wavelength. Thus, the cutoff frequency of the waveguide is determined as fc =
150,000 g
(8.3)
where fc is in megahertz and g in millimeters. Below its cutoff frequency, the waveguide does not leak very much, and it will provide sufficient shielding for f fc/2. The attenuation (SE) of the waveguide dependent on the frequency is given by
SE = 27.2 h
⎛f ⎞ 1− ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ fc ⎠ g
2
[dB]
(8.4)
where both h and g are given in mm. Figure 8.6 shows the shielding effectiveness (SE) depending on the frequency for h/g = 3. For f fc/2, according to the above graph, the SE will be about 70 dB, which is sufficient for most purposes. A smaller g results in higher cutoff frequency, while a larger height h increases the value of shielding effectiveness (SE).
h g
Figure 8.5
Waveguides below cutoff.
8.2 Reflection and Transmission
141
90 80 70 60
SE
50 40 30 20 10 0
0,2
0,0
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
f/f c
Figure 8.6
SE of waveguide below cutoff versus frequency for h/g = 3.
If multiple waveguides similar to multiple apertures are used, there will be a reduction in shielding by 10logn, where n is the number of apertures. Thus, 10 apertures will have 10-dB less attenuation than a single waveguide. If conductors are placed inside the waveguides below cutoff, they will not be equally effective, and the shielding effectiveness will be greatly reduced, so this should be avoided.
8.2
Reflection and Transmission The shielding theory is based on two mechanisms: reflection and transmission (absorption) losses. When an electromagnetic wave in free space—with electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to each other (TEM mode of propagation)—hits a metal wall, one part will be reflected depending on the angle of incidence, and the other part will travel through the metal wall with attenuation (Figure 8.7). The attenuation of the electromagnetic wave will be exponential, depending on the skin depth, δ, and the distance from the border of the two mediums (free space and metal), d. The absorption loss through the metal shield at distance d can be calculated from
(
)
(8.5)
S A = 8686 . ( d δ)[dB]
(8.6)
S A = 20 log10 e d
δ
or
where δ is the skin depth at which the field intensity drops to the value of 1/e: δ = 2 ωµ 0 µ r σ
(8.7)
142
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling
E −d/δ
E*e
P
P
−d/δ
H*e
H
Metal wall
Figure 8.7
Absorption loss in the shield.
with f being the frequency, µr being the permeability of the material, and σ being the conductivity of the material. Absorption loss SA increases with frequency. The necessary shield depth, d, is getting smaller with the rise of frequency, which means that the shield will be more effective on a higher frequency than on a lower frequency. Figure 8.8 shows the aluminum shield depth, d, for SA of 100 dB and 60 dB versus frequency. Figure 8.8 shows that at higher frequencies a good shield can be achieved with a very thin aluminum foil. The results will be similar for any other metal. A part of the electromagnetic field will not be absorbed but reflected. The free space has an impedance of 10 1 Sa = 100 dB
0,1
Sa = 60 dB
d (m)
0,01 0,001 0,0001 0,00001 0,000001 0,0000001 1,E+00
1,E+01
1,E+02
1,E+03
1,E+04
1,E+05
1,E+06
f (Hz)
Figure 8.8
Necessary aluminum shield depth versus frequency.
1,E+07
1,E+08
1,E+09
8.2 Reflection and Transmission
143
µ = 120π = 377 Ω ε
Z0 =
(8.8)
The metal shield has a smaller impedance than free space: ωµ σ
Zs =
(8.9)
Since the two impedances are different, there will be a reflection. The transmission coefficient rt1 at the border of the air and the shield is given as rt 1 =
2Z s Z0 + Zs
(8.10)
The electromagnetic wave must exit the shield again into free space (air) as shown in Figure 8.9, and the transmission coefficient at this second border of the two mediums will be: rt 2 =
2Z 0 Z0 + Zs
(8.11)
The total transmission rttot is given as a product of rt1 and rt2: rttot =
4Z 0 Z s
(Z0
+ Zs )
(8.12)
2
Total reflection and transmission is equal to the incident wave: rt + rr = 1
(8.13)
Since a metal shield has a much smaller impedance than free space, the reflection loss, SR, is given as
Ei
d
Et Er
E tr
Air
E tt Air
Metal
Figure 8.9
Reflection and transmission of an electromagnetic wave at a metal shield.
144
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling
SR =
Z0 Z0 = 4Z s 4 ωµ r µ 0 σ
(8.14)
or in [dB], S R = 20 log10
Z0
(8.15)
4 ωµ r µ 0 σ
The reflection loss decreases with the frequency. Figure 8.10 shows the reflection loss of the aluminum shield depending on the frequency. The total shield loss will be the combined reflection and absorption loss: S = S A S R = S A [dB] + S R [dB]
(8.16)
Total shield loss for aluminum foil 0.1 mm in depth is shown in Figure 8.11. Total shield loss for aluminum foil that is 0.1 mm in depth is shown in Figure 8.11. The figure shows that the reflection loss is dominant on lower frequencies, up to 10 MHz; at 100 MHz their contribution is about the same, and on higher frequencies absorption loss becomes dominant. At even higher frequencies, the shield thickness has almost no influence at all. Total shielding loss is the combination of both contributions (full line); it stays above 100 dB on all frequencies. Other metals give similar results. If the shield consists of several laminate layers, the total reflection and absorption losses will be a sum of reflections between each layer and the attenuation in every layer. The above discussion is valid for far field conditions where E/H = Z0 = 377 ohms. In the near field, the ratio of the electric and magnetic field is different—it changes depending on the distance from the electromagnetic source. Therefore, the shield effectiveness should be considered separately for electric and magnetic fields. 170 160 150
S R (dB)
140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 1,E+00
1,E+02
1,E+04
1,E+06 f (Hz)
Figure 8.10
Aluminum shield reflection loss.
1,E+08
1,E+10
8.2 Reflection and Transmission
145
450 400 350
S
300 SR
250
SA
200
S
150 100 50 0 1,E+00
1,E+02
1,E+04
1,E+06
1,E+08
1,E+10
f (Hz)
Figure 8.11
8.2.1
Reflection and absorption loss for an aluminum shield versus frequency.
Electric Field
Shielding against the electric field is usually made with the Faraday cage (Figure 8.12). The Faraday cage can be a sphere, rectangle, or any other shape. When placed inside an electric field, it will not absorb the field, but rather produce electric potential of different polarity along the edge of the cage. This will create an opposite electric field, which will result in no electric field inside the cage. The earlier discussion proved that the thickness of the cage (shield) is not very important. If the shield has an aperture, the electric field will penetrate inside the shield, and with a wire in the vicinity of the shield, there will be an induced voltage along the wire inside the shield as is shown in Figure 8.13. This figure shows that the electric field intensity falls with the distance from the aperture. It is therefore advisable to place unshielded wires carrying information as far away from the apertures as possible, or to place the apertures away from the critical areas.
Charged metal wall
E
Faraday cage E=0
Figure 8.12
Faraday cage.
146
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling
Charged metal wall Wire E
Shield with aperture
E≠0
E
Figure 8.13
8.2.2
Shield with an aperture.
Magnetic Field
The Faraday cage does not work for the magnetic field. The magnetic field (tangential to the shield) will penetrate the shield that works for the electric field. The attenuation of the magnetic field can be done with material that has a permeability much larger than 1 (µ > 1) as is shown in Figure 8.14. The magnetic field stays in the shield; there will be no magnetic field inside the shield if the permeability of the material is great enough. If the shield has an aperture, the magnetic field will penetrate the shield the same way an electric field penetrates the Faraday shield. The magnetic shield can also be made with a thin conducting material of small permeability for AC. The alternating magnetic field will create the eddy currents, which flow along the shield. These currents create a magnetic field of the opposite
Wire
B>0
H
Figure 8.14
Magnetic shield.
B=0
Magnetic shield with µ >> 1
8.3 Equipment Shielding
147
direction, which will cancel out the outer magnetic field. For higher frequencies, this effect will be stronger. Such an aluminum shield will be sufficient protection against the magnetic field at 50/60 Hz for power lines. It is harder to make the shield for low-frequency magnetic fields than it is for high frequency magnetic fields. The magnetic shield should have as few apertures/holes as possible to sustain shield efficiency. All the apertures (doors, windows, ventilation, cable openings, and so forth) will compromise the shield and allow the tangential magnetic fields to enter the shield. If there should be a cable or wire in the vicinity of the aperture, there can be an induced current, which will be carried further inside the shield and interfere with other equipment (Figure 8.15).
8.3
Equipment Shielding As can be concluded from the above discussion, it is easier to make a shield against the electric field that it is for the magnetic field. Even a very thin metal sheet will provide good shielding effectiveness, especially at high frequencies. Generally it is advisable to keep the wires and equipment as far as possible from the shield walls and the apertures in it. However, today the industry is constantly trying to make electronic devices smaller, and big shields are not practical. If the shield has parallel walls, there will be standing waves between them and thus resonances. It would be best if the shield would be of an irregular shape, which is impractical. It is better to use the rectangular than the cubic shape for the shield in order to lower the number of resonances. Another problem arises when apertures are to be placed in the shield. 8.3.1
Gasketing
Gaskets are elements that are placed inside the apertures to ensure continuity of the shield (Figure 8.16). This can also include doors, windows, or other apertures. Gas-
Wire
H Shield
Figure 8.15
Magnetic field entering through aperture in the shield.
148
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling Gasket
Shield
Figure 8.16
Gasket in the shield.
kets should be able to withstand environmental conditions such as temperature, salt, moisture, and heat for a long time. After a certain period of time they should be replaced. If the gasket is made of the same material as the shield, theoretically the currents in the shield could flow without interruption. This is hard to achieve due to mechanical constraints. Gasket types include spring fingers, metal meshes, and conductively wrapped polymers. Spring fingers (Figure 8.17) are usually made of beryllium copper. They are placed on frequently used doors and must be pressed tightly to achieve a good impedance match with metal walls. As the frequency rises, the finger size should get smaller. Metal meshes consist of elastomer with impregnated metal particles in them. Such a gasket can also function as an environmental seal. Conductively wrapped polymers are a combination of polymer foam or tube and an outer conductive coating. They are flexible and do not require high contact pressure, which makes them vulnerable to environmental conditions. Gaskets should be painted with conductive paint only. They have a wide area of use, from wireless communications (also in mobile phones) to facilities used for testing immunity and emission. Gasket attenuation of an electric field is between 40 dB and 60 dB. The frequency of use is from 10 kHz up to 20 GHz. 8.3.2
PCB Protection
Complete PCB shielding will have a six-sided metal box around it and shielded connectors and filters for power and signal cables going in and out. Another possibility is to have a five-sided metal box attached to the ground plane in several places to create a Faraday cage. There will still be the problem of apertures in the ground plane, the connections between ground plane and metal shield, and in the shield itself (ventilation).
Figure 8.17
Spring fingers.
8.3 Equipment Shielding
149
Generally it is better to have as many tracks or striplines as possible instead of wires and cables. The striplines can be filtered with feed-through filters, or at least with ferrite beads or capacitors. Unfiltered signals should not be close to the filtered ones. The cables entering the PCB should also at least have ferrite beads if they are not filtered. Figure 8.18 shows the PCB shielding. Besides shielding, the design of PCB can improve electromagnetic interference suppression. Every cable is a possible antenna. The PCB traces (striplines) do not radiate as much as cables or wires because of much smaller dimensions. However, they might still radiate, especially when combined with cables going out of the shield. With a proper design, this effect can be minimized. The goal in designing PCB traces is to have a return signal trace close to the one going in the opposite direction. In this way, the electromagnetic fields of both traces will cancel each other out. Figure 8.19 shows a typical PCB connected to the power cable (this can be a signal cable as well). A PCB with a power cable connected can be seen in Figure 8.19(a). The PCB trace line in combination with the power cable can form a structure, which resembles a dipole [Figure 8.19(b)]. The currents flow in the same direction and the radiation is strong and increases with the frequency. This can be prevented with the mains filter (or ferrite beads) on the power cable. On the other hand, another PCB trace going in the opposite direction will form a structure similar to the transmission line [Figure 8.19(c)]. Here, the currents will cancel each other out and the total radiation will be small. The efficiency of the antenna is higher when the antenna is large; cables represent the largest possible antennas, so the currents in the cables are the greatest possible sources of interference. Therefore, the PCB design should be used for transmission line structures and not dipole structures. 8.3.3
Magnetic Shield
Magnetic shielding is needed in protecting computer hard disks, speakers in audio engineering, power sources, and so forth. Shielding from the magnetic field can be
Mains filter
Shield
Ventilation
Ground plane
Signal filters
Figure 8.18
PCB shielding.
150
Electromagnetic Field-to-Aperture Coupling I Power cable I
Z
(a) I
I
Z
Dipole I
I (b)
Transmission line
(c)
Figure 8.19 Dipole and transmission line structures in the PCB. (a) PCB structure, (b) dipole, and (c) transmission line.
done with magnetic materials of high permeability. Materials for magnetic shielding differ in saturation (in Gauss) and permeability (Table 8.1). Other characteristics of magnetic materials include the loss factor, Curie temperature, density, and resistivity. Amumetal is used for high attenuation in a small space. It is available in the thickness from 50 µm to 3 µm. For smaller attenuations, a more economic material like UCLS can be used. S1 and L8 are used for ferrite toroids in the EMI suppression. The attenuation of a circular shield can be calculated from S=
r2 ⎞ µ⎛ ⎜1 − o2 ⎟ 4⎝ rt ⎠
(8.17)
where µ is the material permeability, and ro and ri are the outer and inner shield radiuses.
Table 8.1
Magnetic Material Properties
Material
Saturation Permeability
Amumetal
8,000
400,000
Amunickel 15,000
150,000
ULCS
22,000
4,000
L8
2,550
1,500
J70
2,500
620
M7
2205
160
S1
1625
120
r
8.3 Equipment Shielding
151
Selected Bibliography Gooch, J. W., and J. K. Daher, Electromagnetic Shielding and Corrosion Protection for Aerospace Vehicles, New York: Springer, 2007. Kaires, R. G., “Stopping Electromagnetic Interference at the Printed Circuit Board,” Conformity, November 2003, pp. 12–21. Moongilan, D., and E. Mitchell, “EMI Gasket Shielding Effectiveness Evaluation Method Using Transmission Theory,” Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 18–22, 2008, pp. 1–6. Pothapragada, P., “Selecting Material for Shielding Enclosures,” Conformity, November 2003, pp. 37–39. Raza, I., “Faraday Cage Enclosures and Reduction of Microprocessor Emissions,” Compliance Engineering, 2001. Strauss, I., “Shielding Review,” Conformity, April 2004, pp. 24–32. Vasquez, H., et al., “Simple Device for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Effectiveness Measurement,” IEEE EMC Society Newsletter, Winter 2009, pp. 62–68.
CHAPTER 9
Electrical Grounding and Bonding The electronic equipment’s safety should be dealt with prior to the electromagnetic interference problem. This is why grounding and bonding are important in a proper communication system design. For every signal current sent to the load there will be a return current path (or several of them). Knowing where return currents flow can help minimize interference and improve safety. Grounding and bonding are methods of connecting equipment or cables to each other or to the Earth in order to ensure safety and current flow. Grounding is a procedure in which conductive equipment is connected to the Earth for safety reasons. The conductor that connects equipment to the Earth is called the grounding electrode. If there is an unintentional connection between the equipment and the ungrounded conductor, there will be a ground fault. In this case, a ground-fault current may exist from the ground fault to the electrical supply source and not to the Earth. Not every conductor through which the current flows can be used for grounding. Grounding consists of the following electrically interconnected subsystems: the Earth electrode subsytem, the fault protection system, the lightning protection subsystem, and the signal reference subsystem. All conductive objects or equipment that are not grounded or electrically isolated from the ground by nonconductors or gaskets should be bonded. An untreated isolated conductive object, if charged, can cause static electricity discharge. Bonding is a process of making a low impedance path for the flow of electric current between two metallic objects. The two conductive surfaces are electrically connected to each other to prevent electric potential between metal surfaces, which can cause interference or sparking. There are various bonding methods, which will be discussed in Section 9.4. To provide a mechanically strong and low impedance path for the current flow and to achieve grounding, different metallic objects must be connected (bonded) together. The bonds should be made in such a way that the junction itself does not determine the electric and mechanic properties of the junction. The bond properties should primarily be determined by the metallic objects (members) that are to be connected. Grounding and bonding cables should have low resistance and the ability to withstand environmental conditions and the passage of time. Contact with the metal surface must be kept at all times, regardless of paint loss, corrosion, and surface contamination. If the resistance between bonded objects and the grounding conductor (i.e., 25Ω) is specified, the bonding can be easily tested with simple instruments.
153
154
9.1
Electrical Grounding and Bonding
Grounding for Safety Grounding is a process of connecting metal parts to the Earth for protecting personnel and facilities, as well as for lightning and electrostatic discharge protection. A person can touch the metal enclosure and experience a shock. Electronic devices with AC currents should have grounding incase a current flows between the power source and enclosure, which is usually the biggest conductor or metal plate available. Lightning protection includes low impedance conductors (low resistance and low inductive reactance), which are used to prevent arcing between nearby metallic objects. Grounding must also be performed for protection against electrostatic discharge (ESD) from people, furniture, or other objects that can be charged. The grounding should have a path back to the ground for the discharge current. Grounding can also be used for signal reference. To have an unchanging reference voltage, stray currents must be kept away from the reference ground. As long as the signal reference wire is connected only to one place of another ground, there will be no stray currents. If, however, the signal reference wire is tied to some other ground at two or more points, there will be noise currents causing interference. Short, wide wires are better for grounding than long, thin wires because of lower inductance. Round wires should be avoided for grounding, because they have the highest inductance. If the wire is grounded at more than one point, so called ground loops will be created with interference voltages between them. A connection to the Earth can be through capacitive coupling, accidental contact, and intentional contact. The ground is a direct path of low impedance between the Earth and different communication or electronic equipment. The fault protection subsystem ensures that personnel are protected from shock hazard. In addition, equipment should be protected from damage resulting from faults in the electric system. This is usually done with a green wire placed inside the device, which represents the Earth. The fault protection wire should be separated from the signal reference ground, except at the Earth electrode subsystem. 9.1.1
Shock Control
Human resistance is between 1 kΩ and 10 kΩ, depending on the person’s moisture and wetness levels. This means that voltages up to 50-V AC cannot harm humans. However, higher voltages might cause damage to or even kill a person. This is why electronic equipment is grounded with a metal shield. Personnel operating communication equipment should follow safety measures when working, repairing, installing, and operating dangerous equipment. They must make sure that high-voltage devices have been grounded. Figure 9.1 shows a typical case of a shock hazard. Figure 9.1(a) shows an example of no ground protection. When operating normally, the current will flow only through the intentional resistance R on the return path. If there is an accidental short circuit to the casing of the electronic equipment, the casing will become a shock hazard. If a person touches the frame, the current will flow through the connection of the frame and the equipment (RS) and then through the person (RP) touching the casing to the ground. A current of 75 mA through the body can be fatal. This can be avoided by adding a
9.1 Grounding for Safety
155
Accidental short
Electronic device
Electronic device RS
RS
220/110 V
R
R RP
220/110 V
0V
RP
IS
IS
0V Ground
Ground No ground protection (a)
Figure 9.1
Ground protection (b)
(a, b) Shock hazard.
grounding wire to the equipment casing [Figure 9.1(b)]. The person touching the casing will be protected from electric shock. If there is a fault in the grounding, further protection can be ensured by using filters for electromagnetic interference. Capacitors (0.1 µF for 50/60 Hz) or filters can be placed from hot and neutral wires to the ground wire. If there is a ground fault in the electronic equipment, but there is additional protection with EMI filters or capacitors, the person touching the casing will not experience currents exceeding 5 mA through his or her body, which is safe. 9.1.2
Fault Protection
Fault protection includes a path with low resistance between the location of the fault and the power source. The low resistance path in the building is provided by the green wires. If there is contact between the ground wire and energized conducting objects, the fuses will blow and protect the power source from further damage. The danger from the fault (shock) depends on its duration. That is why fast fuses must be used. The longer the time of fault exposure, the higher the temperature, which can cause a fire. Faults can occur either as a direct short or as an arc. The cause of direct short can be: rodents, water, moisture combined with dirt on insulator surfaces, overload, deterioration from age, and damage from improper installation. The currents in the ground can result in the casing having a higher potential than the ground. The energy from the fault can result in high temperatures, which can damage the equipment or the personnel, or result in a fire. For single phase AC power distribution (Figure 9.2), the ground conductor (green wire) must be one of the four wires. The other three wires are the two phase hot black and red wires and the neutral white wire. The ground wire will carry current only if there is a fault. The hot wires are connected to the high sides of the distribution transformer secondary. The neutral white wire is grounded at the service disconnecting means. The ground green wire is grounded at the supply side of the first service disconnect to the Earth electrode and also to the ground terminal at the distribution transformer. All metal parts should be connected to the green ground wire. The three phase system is similar to the single phase system. There are three phase conductors, one neutral, and one ground. The ground (safety) wire must be
156
Electrical Grounding and Bonding Distribution transformer
Disconnecting means Neutral
Hot 115 V 230 V 115 V Hot Ground
Figure 9.2
Single phase AC power ground connection.
connected to the Earth electrode both at the supply side of the first service disconnect of the facility, as well as at the distribution transformer. The neutral wire must be grounded at both locations as well. More explanations on ground connections can be found in the literature at the end of this chapter.
9.2
Grounding for Voltage Reference Control Signal loss and hardware malfunction in the communication link between two electronic devices that use the Earth ground as a voltage reference can occur due to unwanted noise in the ground loop. The cause can lie in bad grounding, a lightning strike, electrostatic discharge, or ground faults. Signal reference has a common reference for all of the equipment for minimization of currents between the equipment and elimination of the noise voltages on signal paths. It can also be a bus or a conductor for an internal circuit reference of the electronic device. Signal circuits are referenced to the ground for establishing signal return paths between a load and a source, providing fault protection, and controlling electrostatic discharge. Grounding at low frequencies depends on the surface, length, resistance, inductance, and capacitance of the conductor. At higher (RF) frequencies, the conductor must be considered a transmission line. The signal reference in equipment can be a single reference plane or a grid, or more precisely a floating ground, single point ground, or multipoint ground, which is actually an equipotential plane. 9.2.1
Floating Ground
The floating ground shown in Figure 9.3 is used as signal reference for a number of electronic devices in a facility. The floating ground is isolated from the building or facility ground and conductive objects. The noise currents will not be conductively coupled to the signal circuits. How effective the floating ground will be depends on its isolation from the conductors in the vicinity. In large facilities it is hard to achieve and maintain a complete floating ground. The problem lies in the electric static, which can occur in isolated signal circuits, especially if placed near voltage power lines. Electric static
9.2 Grounding for Voltage Reference Control
157 Electronic devices
Fault protection
Fault protection
Signal reference
Ground
Figure 9.3
Floating ground.
can also cause sparks or shock. Most electronic equipment is referenced to the Earth ground, so the power faults in the signal system can cause electronic devices to rise to dangerous voltage levels relative to other conductive objects in the facility. In addition, in the case of lightning, since the conductors are not coupled together the whole system can have an increase in voltage resulting in the breakdown of insulation and arcing. Therefore, the floating ground solution for the signal reference voltage is not the best possible solution. 9.2.2
Single Point Ground
For signal reference, a better solution than the floating ground is the single point ground (Figure 9.4). In this design, the signal paths are referenced to a single point, which in turn is connected to the ground. Ideally, each of the electronic devices as well as circuits inside the devices should have separate ground conductors. This requires a very large number of long wires, which is impractical. The above solution is intended for frequencies up to 300 kHz. The noise coupled in the single point ground is not conductively coupled into the signal circuitry over signal ground wires. However, at higher frequencies, single point grounds become transmission lines, where the ground is the other side of the line. In addition, every part of the equipment bonded to the transmission line is actually a tuned stub (see Section 3.1). At different frequencies, the single point Electronic devices
Fault protection
Fault protection
Signal reference
Ground
Figure 9.4
Single point ground.
158
Electrical Grounding and Bonding
ground will have a different impedance appearing either as an inductor or capacitor and therefore not as a ground. Large facilities also require long wires, which can act as antennas. There is also a problem of stray capacitance between the wires. With all of the above in mind, the single point ground is not recommended for communication systems. 9.2.3
Multipoint Ground
A multipoint ground (Figure 9.5) has many conductive paths from the ground to various electronic devices. Inside each electronic device, circuits are multiply connected to the ground. Multipoint grounding is effective for high frequency signal circuits. Coaxial cables can be easily interfaced since their outer conductor or shield does not have to be floated relative to the equipment casing. If the length of conductors is longer than λ/8 for the highest frequency of use, a multipoint ground will require an additional equipotential ground plane for effective ground. Care must be taken to prevent 50/60-Hz power currents, as well as any low frequency currents of high amplitudes, flowing through the ground system to be conductively coupled to the signal circuits and introduce noise voltages. 9.2.4
Equipotential Plane
Grounding does not always reduce all interference. In some cases it can increase interference by providing conductive coupling paths as well as inductive loops—or it can radiate. This can be countered by placing an equipotential plane on the floor beneath electronic devices being grounded. The equipotential plane is a large conducting material with negligible impedance. The equipotential plane can also be placed above the electronic devices if it is impossible to install it below them. Why is an equipotential plane better than a grounding wire? The characteristic impedance is a function of L/C , so if the capacity C increases, the characteristic impedance decreases. The capacity of a large metallic sheet is much larger than that of a wire. In addition, the inductance L is decreased with width, which decreases the characteristic impedance even more. An equipotential plane with large dimensions has a very
Electronic devices
Fault protection
Figure 9.5
Multipoint ground.
Fault protection
9.3 Bonding for Current Control
159
low characteristic impedance for a wide frequency range; it represents a reference plane for all the electronic devices bonded to it. Compared to other grounds, the equipotential plane represents a safer protection for personnel, since there is no need for long grounding wires. If placed below an antenna, the equipotential plane protects the antenna from radiating cables or wires that might be placed below it. The equipotential plane can be built with a copper grid placed in a concrete floor, an aluminum (or copper) screen placed under the carpet/floor tile, or on the ceiling. The equipotential plane must be bonded to the Earth electrode at several points.
9.3
Bonding for Current Control Bonding is a procedure that permanently joins two metallic parts to form a low impedance connection, which will ensure electrical continuity as well as capacity to conduct any current. Bonding also ensures equal potential between separate connections to the ground. In every communication system there are many interconnections between metallic parts in order to provide lightning and fault protection, reference signals, and power. These connections must be made in such a way as not to change the electric path’s properties. The connection or junction must be strong and durable, have low impedance, and be resilient to corrosion. Bonding is used for prevention of static accumulation, lightning, shock, fault current return path, and minimization of RF potentials on casings. Improper bonds can cause load voltage drops or heat, which can result in a fire. In signal paths, bad bonds can cause noise and lower the signal level. Bonding can also influence shield effectiveness. Bonding must be done carefully for interference reduction using a lowpass π filter for a power line as shown in Figure 9.6. The interfering high frequency current I1 will reach the ground through the ZB and should not reach the load, ZL. If the casing is not bonded properly to the ground reference plane, the bond impedance, ZB, could be relatively large compared to the reactance, XC, at the interfering frequency, and the interference current, I2, could reach the load and thus lower the filter efficiency. L
C/2
C/2 I2
U I1
ZB
Figure 9.6
Improper bonding for a lowpass filter.
ZL
160
Electrical Grounding and Bonding
9.3.1
Bonding Classes
Table 9.1 gives bonding classes. The class A bond is used for bonding antenna installations. Radiating elements have to be installed with a ground plane of negligible impedance for operating frequencies of the antenna, but should not interfere with the antenna radiation pattern. The RF currents must have a low impedance path of a small length. For the coaxial antenna there must be continuity between outer conductors or the shield and ground plane of antennas. The class C bond reduces power and voltage losses. This bond type requires low impedance and low voltages in joints for assuring adequate power to the user. The class H bond protects against fire and shock to the personnel. It is applied to electronic devices required to carry the fault current. Bonding resistance for this class must be 0.1Ω or lower. The class L bond is used for lightning protection and must be able to endure very high currents (200 kA) and magnetic forces. Low inductance of the bond is required. The class R bond is applied in cases of RF noise, which is present in a wide frequency range. The R bond requires low RF impedance at high frequencies. The bonding resistance must be 5 mΩ or lower. Low inductance is also required. This bond type will be discussed in more detail below. The class S bond protects against electrostatic discharge. The bonding resistance must be 1Ω or lower. All isolated conductors with dimensions greater than 7.5 cm must be bonded with the S bond because they can be charged. 9.3.2
Strap Bond for Class R
Isolated metallic elements whose linear dimensions are close to half of the wavelength (λ/2) associated with the operating frequency can act as an antenna and receive RF signals as well as produce enough voltage to cause discharge to other electronic devices or circuits. The strap bond discussed in this section is an indirect bonding type. The inductance L of a thin metal strap is given with ⎡ ⎛ 2l ⎞ ⎛ w + t ⎞⎤ L = 0002 l ⎢ln ⎜ . . + 02235 . ⎟ ⎟ + 05 ⎜ ⎝ l ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎣ ⎝w + t⎠
[ µH]
(9.1)
where l is the length, w is the width, and t is the thickness of the strap in centimeters. If the strap is round, the inductance is given as ⎡ ⎛ 4l ⎞ ⎤ L = 0002 l ⎢ln ⎜ ⎟ − x ⎥ . ⎝ ⎠ d ⎣ ⎦ Table 9.1 Class
[µH]
Bonding Classes
Application
A
Antenna installation
C
Current path return
H
Shock hazard
L
Lightning protection
R
RF potential
S
Static charge
(9.2)
9.3 Bonding for Current Control
161
where d is the diameter of the strap in cm. For low frequencies x = 0.75 and for high frequencies x = 1. The inductive reactance of the strap is X L = ωL = 2 πfL
(9.3)
where f is the frequency in hertz and L is the inductance in H. If, for example, the round strap has the following characteristics: resistance (l = −6 2 20 cm) R = 32.2 · 10 Ω, length 20 cm, diameter 1 cm , thickness 0.1 cm, and width 6 cm, its inductance will be according to (9.2): L = 0.1453 µH. The capacitance of the bond can be found from C=ε
S d
(9.4)
where ε is the dielectric constant, d is the distance between mating surfaces, and S is the area of mating surfaces. The capacitive reactance is XC =
1 2πfC
(9.5)
where f is the frequency and C is the capacitance. If the square area of the bond is 200 cm2 and the bond is covered with a 0.02 cm layer of nonconductive paint, the bond capacitance will be according to (9.5): C = 8,852 pF. The bond impedance depends on the frequency. The capacitive reactance is high at low frequencies and decreases as the frequency increases. The inductive reactance increases with frequency. At a resonant frequency, the impedance will reach its maximum, which can be more than a thousand Ωs. The resonant frequency is found from fr =
1 2π LC
(9.6)
The resonant frequency for the above example is 4.44 MHz. The inductive and capacitive reactance will be XL = 4.05Ω and XC = 4.05Ω. The impedance at the resonance is found from Zr =
X2 R
(9.7)
where X is the inductive or capacitive reactance at the resonant frequency and R is 5 the resistance of the strap. For the above example, Zr will be 5.1 · 10 Ω.The obtained value is much higher than the required 5 mΩ. That is why bonding straps must be checked for their resonance.
162
Electrical Grounding and Bonding
9.3.3
Resistance Requirements
The most important requirement for bonding is the low resistance path between the two parts that are to be joined. For the antistatic discharge, even the relatively high resistance of 50 kΩ is sufficient. This value, however, is not sufficiently low enough for lightning protection or fault currents. If bonding is used for voltage reference, the necessary resistance will depend on the estimated voltage and current levels. If the surfaces of the two parts to be joined together are properly cleaned, and the pressure used for bonding the mating surfaces is continuous, the bonding resistance achieved can be as low as 1 mΩ. Any attempts to achieve lower bonding resistance than intrinsic resistance of the conductors are unnecessary. The surfaces have to be cleaned to prevent corrosion. This issue will be dealt with in Section 9.5. All the bond resistances to the ground equipotential plane should have the same resistances, which will ensure minimum voltage drops and lower the noise in the system. Low bond resistance at DC does not necessarily mean that it will stay low at high frequencies. The bond resistance at high frequencies will depend on path resonances, transmission line effects, stray capacitance, and conductor inductance.
9.4
Types of Electrical Bonds Bonding two metal parts regardless of whether they are intended for lightning protection, Earth electrodes, or mating of the equipment front panels to the equipment racks can be done with different direct or indirect electrical bonds. The best bond is achieved by welding and brazing. Silver soldering also makes a very good bond. Round wires used as jumpers do not make very good bonds because of high inductance. A metal strap has a much lower impedance than a round wire and is a better solution. The strap length to width ratio should equal 5 to 1, while the strap width to thickness should be 10 to 1 or more. If the bond length is equal or above 0.1λ for the corresponding frequency, the bond will not be effective. Whatever bonding method is applied, it is important to obtain electric continuity and keep the DC resistance and RF resistance as low as possible. Direct bonding (welding, brazing) is the best type and is used if the two members have no relative movement and the bond will be permanent. If the two members must be separated, indirect bonding (bolting, clamping, straps, or other auxiliary conductors) can also be used. Figure 9.7 shows the direct bond of two members, by both butt joint and lap joint. The current flowing between the two members will depend on the resisMember 2 Member 1
Member 2
Member 1
I I Butt joint
Figure 9.7
Butt and lap joint.
Lap joint
9.4 Types of Electrical Bonds
163
tance of the two conductors and on bond resistance. The bond resistance increases the total resistance of the path, and it must be much smaller than the conductors’ resistances so that the path resistance depends primarily on the conductor resistances. Both the direct and indirect bonding methods will determine the bonding resistance, which will depend on the type of metal used, surface cleanness, contact pressure at the surfaces, and cross-section area of the mating surfaces. 9.4.1
Welding and Brazing
Welding is the best bonding method in view of the electrical properties of the bond. Heat over 2,000°C cleans the metal surfaces from any contamination. The bond resistance is close to 0 due to a very short bond length compared to member lengths. The bond strength is equal to if not stronger than the strength of the members. Intensive heat prevents moisture penetration into the bond, so there is almost no corrosion. The longevity of the bond depends on the duration of its members. Although welding is expensive, it should be utilized for permanent bonds. Brazing (Figure 9.8), including silver soldering, is also a metal flow process similar to welding for permanent bonding. The temperature used in brazing is above 800°C, which is above the melting point of the brazing filler metal, but below the melting point of the bond members. The filler metal is used to make contact between the two metal members. The brazed bond resistance is close to 0, but since the filler metal is different from the bond members, corrosion is more probable than in welding. 9.4.2
Bolting
In some cases permanent bonds are not desirable. This includes moving equipment from one place to another (e.g., for repairing) or disconnecting the connections. Less permanent bonds are also easier to achieve and are more flexible. One of the most used semipermanent bonds is the bolting connection (Figure 9.9) with bolts, screws, or similar fasteners, which should be able to sustain shock and vibrations. The bolts provide the necessary pressure between contact surfaces. The primary purpose of the bolts is not to be conductive; they do not even have to be metallic. The necessary pressure between the mating surfaces, which should be over 8 MN/m2, will determine the number of bolts. It is better to use more bolts for large connecting surfaces, or even to use rigid backing plates or clamps. Brazing filler metal
Member 1
Figure 9.8
Brazing.
Member 2
164
Electrical Grounding and Bonding Member 2 Member 1
Bolt
Figure 9.9
9.4.3
Bonding area
Bolting.
Conductive Adhesive
Conductive adhesive is a direct low resistance bond without the use of heat. Conductive adhesive is made of two-component silver-filled epoxy resin, which provides good electrical conductivity. It is used in places where heat might damage the equipment or cause a fire. In combination with bolts, the conductive adhesive lowers the danger of corrosion, at the same time maintaining high mechanical strength. The problem with conductive adhesive is that it is not easy to disassemble.
9.5
Galvanic (Dissimilar Metal) Corrosion Control Corrosion is the deterioration of conductive material due to environmental influences. Almost all environments are corrosive. This is especially true for industrial areas. Corrosion raises the required low resistance connection up to the point where it becomes unusable. Corrosion is actually a chemical process in metals (Figure 9.10). The metal surface will form an anode and a cathode due to impurities in contact through the metal. If there is an electrolyte or conducting fluid in the environment above the surface of the metal, the circuit will allow the currents to flow from the anode into the cathode and thus make corrosion possible. This will result in oxidation (i.e., the transfer of electrons from the metal into the environment/oxidizing agent). The oxidation will cause an electromotive force (EMF) between the metal and oxidation agent. Metal in contact with an oxidizing solution will cause a fixed potential difference compared to any other metal in the same condition. This set of Anode
I
Electrolyte
Cathode
I
Metal
Figure 9.10
Corrosion.
9.5 Galvanic (Dissimilar Metal) Corrosion Control
165
potentials, or EMF series, depends on the temperature and ion concentration in the solution, and is given for some metals in Table 9.2. Table 9.2 shows the relative tendencies of materials to corrode; higher values represent more of a chance for corrosion, meaning that aluminum is more likely to corrode than gold. The higher the potential is between two metals, the more dissimilar the metals and the more chance for corrosion. The metal with the higher voltage will be the anode and the metal with the lower voltage will be the cathode. The current flowing between the two metals will result in metal loss. This phenomenon is called galvanic corrosion. Metals in a bond should be of the same material or as similar as possible (close electrode potentials) to prevent galvanic corrosion. Corrosion can exist only if current can flow from anode to cathode. If there is water on the surface, the impurities of the water will support corrosion. Therefore, the metal parts have to be painted (coated), since paint prevents moisture from reaching the metal and thus provides the electrolytic path for the current between the anode and the cathode. If bonding is to occur between different materials, the member representing the anode (higher voltage) should always be larger than the one representing the cathode (lower voltage) as shown in Figure 9.11. If, for example, a copper strap is bonded to an iron plate, the iron will not corrode much because of the large anodic area. In reverse, an iron strap in contact with a copper plate will corrode very fast due to a small anodic area. It is desirable to cover both the anodic and the cathodic member with paint. Never should only the anode be painted, since this will speed up the corrosion—the small breaks in the paint actually become a small anodic area. Before bonding, the metal members should be cleaned with a wire brush, steel wool, or other means to achieve a bright metal finish. Sometimes chemical cleaning Table 9.2 Series Metal
Standard EMF Electrode Potential (V)
Aluminum
2.37
Iron
0.440
Tin
0.136
Lead
0.126
Copper
−0.337
Silver
−0.799
Gold
−1.5 Moisture
Anode
Figure 9.11
Dissimilar junction.
Cathode
166
Electrical Grounding and Bonding
will be necessary. It is a good idea to use washers for bonding as well, because they can be easily replaced in case of corrosion. At the end, a protective coating should be applied for anticorrosion, and the bonds should be tested periodically to ensure that their performance is satisfactory.
Selected Bibliography Military Handbook, Grounding, Bonding and Shielding For Electronic Equipment and Facilities, MIL-HDBK-419A, December 29, 1987. MIL-STD-1542B(USAF), Electromagnetic Compatibility and Grounding Requirements for Space System Facilities, November 15, 1991. MIL-STD-188-124B, Grounding, Bonding and Shielding for Common Long Haul/Tactical Communication Systems Including Ground Based Communications—Electronics Facilities and Equipments, February 1, 1992. MIL-STD-1310G, Standard Practice for Shipboard Bonding, Grounding, and Other Techniques for Electromagnetic Compatibility and Safety, June 28, 1996. NASA-STD-P023, Electrical Bonding for NASA Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft, Payloads, and Flight Equipment, August 17, 2001. NSTS 37330, Space Shuttle Bonding, Electrical, and Lightning Specifications, December 2, 1999.
CHAPTER 10
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted 10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted Electromagnetic interference (EMI) can be regarded as a sort of environment pollution with consequences similar to those of poison chemicals, automobile gas exhaust, and so forth. The electromagnetic spectrum is a natural source that has been devastated to a large extent in the last hundred years. The spectrum is full, which is why new technologies operate on increasingly higher frequencies. Modern life depends on the systems using the electromagnetic spectrum, and its protection is a priority. Uncontrolled electromagnetic radiation can lead to equipment damage, loss of money, injuries, and even death. Electromagnetic interference introduces unwanted voltages and currents into the equipment—the victim. This can lead to audio noise in radio receivers, as well as snow or picture loss on TV receivers. When the victims are communication links or computer systems operating industry facilities, the damage is even greater. Interference can find its way to the victim in two ways: through cables (conducting) and by electromagnetic radiation. 10.1.1
Sources of Electromagnetic Interference
Every electric or electronic device that changes voltage or current can be an EMI source. Electric devices can introduce interference by electromagnetic radiation or through the cables. Electric shavers and dish washers can cause interference on TV sets, not only directly via radiation but by power cables as well (Figure 10.1). Generally, a faster change of voltage or current will result in a wider interference spectrum. Similarly, a higher voltage or current level will cause a higher conducted or radiated interference level. Therefore, electric machines generating high voltages and currents with a fast rise will be strong EMI sources. Table 10.1 shows the EMI sources regarding usage. EMI sources can also be divided into continuous and transient. Radar, although an impulse system, has a wide but stable RF spectrum and is considered a continuous EMI source. The radiation from continuous EMI sources can best be analyzed with the spectrum analyzer. On the other hand, lightning or nuclear electromagnetic pulse occurs unpredictably and is called transient radiation. Transient signals are very short and have a wide spectrum. They are analyzed much easier in the time
167
168
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
Figure 10.1
Table 10.1
EMI from an electric shaver and dish washer to the TV receiver.
EMI Sources Regarding Usage
Manmade Sources Communication
Power Lines
Vehicle Systems
Engines and Tools
Industrial/ Commercial
Customers
Broadcasting
Generators
Automobiles
Compressors
Dielectric heaters Microwaves
Radar
Converters
Ignitions
Saws
Air conditioners
Walkie-talkies
Amplifiers
Mobile devices
RF heaters
Fluorescent lights PCs
Amateur radio
Transmissions
Ultrasound cleaners
Lasers
Blenders
ELF/VLF navigation
Line noise
Welding machines
Neon signs
Vacuum cleaners
Cranes
Medical devices
Hair dryers
Mobile devices Remote controls
ESD
Ovens
Refrigerators Electric shavers
Natural Sources Static Noise
Atmosphere
Solar Noise
Lightning
Space Radio Noise
domain. It is very hard to monitor the fast transient spectrum. Table 10.2 shows some continuous and transient EMI sources. An EMI problem exists only when the EMI source can exchange electromagnetic energy with its victim. The general EMI problem is shown in Figure 10.2. The coupling between the EMI source and EMI receiver (victim) can be either radiated or conducted. The energy exchange between the EMI source and victim equipment can happen through the metal guides of the victim. If the primary coupling is radiated, and the EMI receiver has an input cable (which is not connected to the EMI source), the currents in the cable can appear and go directly to the victim, as shown in Figure 10.3, even if the victim is protected from radiated interference with a shield.
10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted Table 10.2
169
Sources of Continuous and Transient EMI
Continuous EMI Sources— Frequency Domain Analysis
Transient EMI Sources— Time Domain Analysis
Broadcasting
Lightning
Ship radar (pulsed output)
Nuclear electromagnetic pulse
Electric machine noise
Power line sparks
Fixed and mobile communications
Relays and switches
PCs, printers
Welding machines
Solar and space radio noise
Human electrostatic discharge (ESD) Radiated
EMI receiver (victim)
EMI source
Conducted Transmitter
Figure 10.2
Coupling
Receiver
EMI problem.
Radiated EMI
Shield protects radiated coupling EMI source Victim input connector
Conducted RF currents
I
RF EMI current into the cable
Figure 10.3
The cable works as unwanted antenna to other equipment
Conducted EMI from radiated EMI.
Similarly, if the primary coupling is conducted, and the victim has a good filter connected to the cable entrance, the currents in the cable can still radiate EM energy, which can be coupled into the victim if it does not have an appropriate shielding (Figure 10.4). These two examples show that both conducted and radiated interference (direct and indirect) must be considered to prevent EMI energy going from the EMI source to the victim equipment. It is, therefore, necessary to shield and filter the equipment simultaneously.
170
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
Radiation from the cable reaches PCB
Weak or no shield
EMI source
Victim
I
PCB
RF current source
Strong conducted EMI
Circuits directly exposed to radiated EMI
Good filter prevents conducted EMI
Figure 10.4
Radiated EMI from conducted EMI.
Some examples of intentional and unintentional EMI receivers are in Table 10.3. EMC is divided according to Figure 10.5. The main activities are conducted emission, conducted susceptibility, radiated emission, and radiated susceptibility. Other activities include transients [electrostatic discharge (ESD), nuclear electromagnetic impulse, and lightning]. Electroexplosive devices and nonionizing effects of electromagnetic radiation fall into general activities of electromagnetic compatibility and are beyond the scope of this book. Emission and susceptibility are the two most common tests of electromagnetic interference (EMI) that a device or piece of equipment should undergo, whether it operates on low or RF frequencies. Emission is the unintentional or undesired exiting of potentially interfering electromagnetic energy from electrical or electronic sources (devices, modules, equipment, and systems). Emission can also be intentional, such as from a transmitter, although it is not intended to cause interference to other devices or equipment. Emission can be conducted (carried along cables) or radiated (via propagation). Conducted emission (CE) is the potential EMI that is generated inside the equipment and is carried out of the equipment over I/O lines, control leads, or power mains. Radiated emission (RE) is the potential EMI that Table 10.3
EMI Receivers
Intentional Receivers
Unintentional Receivers
Radio receivers
Airplane control systems
TV receivers
Military systems, guided missiles
Mobile phone receivers
Ship electronic systems
Microwave relay systems
Computer equipment
Air system receivers
Signalization systems
Navigation
Pacemakers
Radar
Explosives
10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
171
EMC activities
Nonionizing effects of electromagnetic radiation
Electroexplosive device safety
Transients
Radiated EMI
Radiated emission
Radiated sensitivity
10 Hz–40 GHz E field 14 kHz–40 GHz H field 10 Hz–30 MHz level to −110 dB V/m
10 Hz–40 GHz 1–200 V/m (CW)
Nuclear EMP 50 kV/m RS (10/400 ms) 100 A
Figure 10.5
Conducted EMI
Conducted sensitivity Cables 20 Hz–100 MHz antenna 100 MHz–40 GHz levels to −120 dB V/m
Cable interference lightning 10 kV transients harmonic distortions
Conducted sensitivity 20 Hz–400 MHz −20 dBm VA
Human ESD 15 kV transients direct and indirect
EMC activities.
radiates from escape-coupling paths such as cables, leaky apertures, or inadequately shielded housings. Susceptibility is the characteristic of electronic equipment that permits undesirable responses when subjected to electromagnetic energy. It is sometimes also called immunity. There are two types of susceptibility: conducted and radiated. Conducted susceptibility (CS) is EMI that couples from the outside of a piece of equipment to the inside over conductors (I/O cables, control and signal leads, or power mains). Radiated susceptibility (RS) is the undesired potential EMI that is radiated into a piece of equipment or system from a hostile outside electromagnetic source. 10.1.2
Test Requirements for Emission and Susceptibility
Table 10.4 indicates the military and commercial tests that are required for the test sample. Regardless of the EMC test standard, the product must be set up in a controlled environment. This includes providing the test sample with standardized power to compare results from one lab to another. Commercial equipment is sometimes used in a military environment. In some cases it is possible to compare military and commercial standards, and in other cases it is not. The reason is the different frequency bands specified for different tests, as well as injection methods used. Commercial standards such as EN 50081, EN 50082, IEC 60533, and IEC 945 can be compared with military standard Mil-Std-461 to some extent. For conducted emission both military and commercial standards use the Line Impedance Stabilization Network (LISN) for injection of interference. The military
172
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted Table 10.4 Commercial and Military Tests of Emissions and Susceptibility— Radiated and Conducted Requirement
Commercial Military
CE Power Line (30 Hz to 10 kHz + Harmonics)
Yes
Yes
CE Power Line (fluctuations)
Yes
No
CE Power Line (10 kHz/150 kHz to 10 MHz/30 MHz)
Yes
Yes
CE Antenna (10 kHz to 40 GHz)
No
Yes
CS Power Line (30 Hz to 150 kHz)
Yes
Yes
CS Structure CM (60 Hz to 100 kHz)
No
Yes
CS Bulk Cable (10 kHz/150 kHz to 200 MHz/230 MHz) Yes
Yes
CS Bulk Cable (impulse)
Yes
Yes
CE Cables P/S (damped sine 100 kHz to 100 MHz)
No
Yes
RE Magnetic Field (30 Hz to 100 kHz)
No
Yes
RE Electric Field (10 kHz/30 MHz to 18 GHz/40 GHz)
Yes
Yes
RE Antenna (10 kHz to 40 GHz)
No
Yes
RS Magnetic Field (30 Hz to 100 kHz)
No
Yes
RS Electric Field (10 kHz/26 MHz to 40 GHz/1 GHz)
Yes
Yes
RS Transient EM Field (impulse)
No
Yes
RS ESD (up to 8 kV)
Yes
No
Legend: CE: conducted emission; CS: conducted susceptibility; RE: radiated emission; RS: radiated susceptibility.
standard (Mil-Std-461E) measures the current in the frequency range from 30 Hz to 10 kHz. In the frequency range from 10 kHz to 10 MHz, the voltage is measured. However, the commercial standards (IEC 60533 and EN 50081-2) measure only voltages between 150 kHz and 30 MHz. For radiated emission, in the harmonized commercial standards, only the electric field is measured. Commercial standards require an open test site environment (OATS), while military standards require a shielded room. The cage effect is responsible for a deviation to open site measurement results of maximum of 6 dB. The measuring distance in the commercial standards is 30m, and sometimes 10m—only in some cases is 3m allowed. However, IEC 60533 has a distance of 3m in all cases. Mil-Std 461 has a measuring distance of only 1m, which can sometimes be a problem because the antenna is placed in near field. Most commercial standards have a measuring range from 30 MHz to 1 GHz, with the exception of IEC 60533 having a starting frequency of 150 kHz. Mil-Std 461 has a frequency range from 10 KHz to 18 GHz. For conducted susceptibility commercial and military standards are not really comparable because of different injection methods. For radiated susceptibility the frequency range of commercial standards is from 30 MHz to 1 GHz (80 MHz to 2 GHz in IEC 60533), while military standards cover the frequency range from 10 kHz to 40 GHz. While military standards use nonmodulated test signals, commercial tests use a modulation of 80% with 1 kHz. In some cases like with electromagnetic pulse (EMP) where equipment should withstand 50 kV/m, only military tests exist.
10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
10.1.3
173
Standard Organizations
Today’s products must conform to regulations and standards of both private and government regulatory agencies. Their number is increasing, and updates are constantly being made. There are several international standard agencies like ISO, IEEE, IEC, ITU, and so forth. Each country has its own laws and standard organizations. Accredited testing laboratories issue certifications for products. A standard is a document established by a consensus and approved by a recognized body, which provides (for common and repeated use) rules, guidelines, or characteristics for activities or their results aimed at the achievement of the optimum degree of order in a given context. Standards cover several disciplines, dealing with all technical, economic, and social aspects of human activity and covering all basic disciplines such as language, mathematics, physics, and so forth. Standards are developed by technical committees. There are several interested parties such as: producers, users, laboratories, public authorities, and consumers. Standards are based on actual experience and lead to material results in practice (products—both goods and services, test methods, and so forth). They are a compromise between the state of the art and the economic constraints of the time. Standards are documents that are recognized as valid nationally, regionally, or internationally; they are reviewed periodically and evolve with technological and social progress. Standards are available to everyone, and can be consulted and purchased without restriction. Generally, standards are not mandatory, but voluntary. In certain cases their implementation may be obligatory (e.g., safety requirements, electrical installations, public contracts, and so forth). Standards are used more and more by jurisprudence. For the user, the standard is a factor for production rationalization, which makes it possible to master technical characteristics of products, satisfy the customer, validate the manufacturing methods, increase productivity, and give operators and installation technicians a feeling of security. There are four major types of standards: 1. Fundamental standards concerning terminology, metrology, conventions, signs and symbols, and so forth; 2. Test methods and analysis standards, which measure characteristics; 3. Standards defining product characteristics (product standard), specification standards (service activities standard), and standards for performance thresholds to be reached (fitness for use, interface and interchange ability, health, safety, environmental protection, standard contracts, documentation accompanying products or services); 4. Organization standards dealing with the description of functions of the company and their mutual relationships, as well as the modeling of activities (quality management and assurance, maintenance, value analysis, logistics, quality management, project or systems management, production management). A national standard is programmed and studied under the authority of the national standards body, which publishes it. It is therefore protected, as early as at the draft standard stage, by a copyright belonging to the national body. International standards are protected by a copyright of the international standards body
174
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
(ISO, IEC). The exploitation right of this copyright is automatically transferred to the national standard bodies that are members of ISO or IEC, for the purpose of creating national standards. The national standards body is obliged to take all appropriate measures to protect the intellectual property of the ISO and IEC on national territory. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), founded in 1947, is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies currently comprised of over 125 members—one per country. The mission of the ISO is to encourage the development of standardization and related activities in the world in order to facilitate international exchanges of goods. Its work concerns all of the fields of standardization except for electrical and electronic engineering standards, which fall within the scope of IEC. ISO counts over 2,800 technical work bodies (technical committees, subcommittees, working groups, and ad hoc groups). To date, ISO has published over 16,000 international standards. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) was founded in 1906, and is responsible for international standardization in the fields of electricity, electronics, and related technologies. It deals with all electrotechnologies including electronics, magnetism and electromagnetism, electroaccoustics, telecommunication, energy production and distribution, as well as associated general disciplines such as terminology and symbols, measurement and performance, dependability, design and development, safety, and environment. The IEC currently has over 50 members (national committees), one for each country, which are required to be fully representative of all electrotechnical interests in the country concerned. National committees are largely supported by the industry and are recognized by their respective governments. The IEC has published over 10,000 standards. Both the ISO and IEC have their central offices in Geneva, Switzerland, and operate according to similar rules. The incorporation of ISO and/or IEC standards into national collections is voluntary—it can be complete or partial. The birth of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) can be traced back to 1865. A specialized agency of the United Nations since 1947, ITU membership currently includes some 180 member states and over 400 sector members. ITU international recommendations are developed in the fields of both telecommunications and radiocommunications. ITU headquarters are located in Geneva, Switzerland. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is the world’s largest technical professional society. It was founded in 1884; today it has over 380,000 members in more than 150 countries and has created about 2,000 standards. The IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) is the newly founded organization under which all IEEE Standards Activities and programs will be carried out. In the United States there are: •
ANSI—The American National Standards Institute was founded in 1918. It is the official U.S. representative to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and, via the U.S. National Committee, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). ANSI is also a member of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF).
10.1 Control of Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted •
•
175
FCC—The Federal Communications Commission is an independent United States’ government agency. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is in charge of regulating interstate and international communications via radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable. The FCC’s jurisdiction covers the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions. NIST—The National Institute of Standards and Technology, founded in 1901, is a nonregulatory federal agency within the U.S. Commerce Department, which develops and promotes measurement, standards, and technology to enhance productivity, enable trade, and improve the quality of life.
In the European Union there also several standard organizations: •
•
•
•
•
CEN—The Comité Européen de Normalisation (European Committee for Standardization) was founded in 1961. It draws up European standards and consists of 27 European standards’ institutes. The CEN has witnessed strong development with the construction of the European Union. Its headquarters are located in Brussels, Belgium. A technical board is in charge of coordination, planning, and programming of the work conducted within the work bodies (technical committees, subcommittees, working groups); the secretariats of which are decentralized in the different EU member states. CEN, which counts over 250 technical committees, has published several thousand documents. CENELEC—Comité Européen de Normalisation Électrotechnique (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization) was founded in 1959 and is located in Brussels, Belgium. CENELEC fulfils the same functions as CEN within the electrotechnical sector. ETSI—The European Telecommunications Standards Institute, develops European standards in the telecommunications field (ETS, European Telecom Standard). Its headquarters are at Sophia Antipolis, France. ETSI has 400 members (administrations, operators, research bodies, industrialists, users) representing over 30 countries (EU, Eastern Europe). ECMA—The European Association for Standardizing Information and Communication Systems is an international, Europe-based industry association founded in 1961 and dedicated to the standardization of information and communication systems. ECMA standards and technical reports are made available to all interested persons or organizations, free of charge and copyright, and can be obtained in printed form. EBU—The European Broadcasting Union was created in 1950, initially with the aim of solving technical and legal problems and then to develop news and program exchanges. The result is that today the EBU assists its members in all areas of broadcasting, briefs them on developments in the audio-visual sector, provides advice and defends their interests with international bodies. Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the EBU is the world’s largest professional association of national broadcasters. Following a merger with the EBU on January 1, 1993, the International Radio and Television Organization (OIRT)—the former association of Socialist Bloc Broadcasters—expanded
176
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
•
the EBU to 75 active members from 56 countries in and around Europe, and 45 associate members around the world. CEPT—The Conference Européen des Administrations des Postes et des Télécommunications [European Post, Telephone, and Telegraph Agencies (PTT)] recommends communication specifications to the International Telecommunication Union Standardization Sector (ITU-T).
In South America there are: •
•
COPANT—The Pan American Standards Commission is a civil, nonprofit association with complete operational autonomy. The basic objectives of COPANT are to promote the development of technical standardization and related activities in its member countries with the aim of promoting the industrial, scientific, and technological development for the benefit of an exchange of goods and provision of services, while facilitating cooperation in the intellectual, scientific, and social fields. The commission coordinates the activities of all institutes of standardization in Latin American countries and develops all types of product standards, standardized test methods, terminology, and related matters. COPANT headquarters are in Buenos Aires, Argentina. MERCOSUR—The Common Market of the South (Portuguese acronym MERCOSUL), is a common market made up of the economies of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Its principal objectives are to improve the economies of its member countries by making them more efficient and competitive, and by enlarging their markets and accelerating their economic development by means of a more efficient use of available resources Further objectives are to preserve the environment, improve communications, coordinate macroeconomic policies, and harmonize the different sectors of South American economies. MERCOSUR’s permanent headquarters are in the city of Montevideo, Uruguay.
Each national standards body manages its own collection of standards and has access to the collections of other institutes. The collections can be either free information tools or services for identifying standards or announcing new standards. This can include catalogs, newsletters, Web servers, or chargeable services providing access to the normative texts in different forms (subscription, hardcopy form, CD-ROM). National members of the ISO and IEC maintain links to related national organizations and, when applicable, to national standards–related networks. Information about standards can also be found in the ISO/IEC Directory of International Standardizing Bodies. Normally, information on standardization and certification systems, the identification of information concerning standards, and products and services is free. The publications of the standards bodies (standards, handbooks, hardcopy catalogues) are chargeable, and each body has its own tariffs. Every country has its national body for issuing its own standards or they use international ones.
10.2 Commercial Requirements
10.2
177
Commercial Requirements The United States, European Union, Japan, Canada, Australia, and other countries have set up requirements for the emission and susceptibility of commercial equipment. These requirements are included in the standards given below. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) requires manufacturers of most types of electronic products to test the emission specifications. The requirements are specified in the Code of Federal Regulations. Certain types of equipment require special testing by FCC. The IEC 60533 is a standard applicable for electromagnetic compatibility of electrical and electronic installations in merchant ships. Electrical installations of ships with electric and/or electronic systems need to operate under a wide range of environmental conditions. The control of undesired electromagnetic emission ensures that No other device on board is influenced by the equipment under test. On the other hand, the equipment needs to function without degradation in a normal electromagnetic environment (immunity). Special risks (e.g., lightning strikes), transients from the operation of circuit breakers, and electromagnetic radiation from radio transmitters are also covered. This standard also gives guidelines and recommendations on the measures to achieve EMC in electrical and electronic installations of the following equipment groups: • • • • • • •
Group A: radio communication and navigation equipment; Group B: power generation and conversion equipment; Group C: equipment operating with pulsed power; Group D: switchgear and control systems; Group E: intercommunication and signal processing equipment; Group F: nonelectrical items and equipment; Group G: integrated systems.
The IEC 945 (now IEC 60945) is an interference standard for navigation equipment installed in a ship’s environment. IEC 945 was originally produced to provide test methods and, where appropriate, limit values for electronic navigational aids. The two European EN standards are generic standards for equipment installed in an industrial environment and do not deal with product standards. EN 50081 is an emission standard and EN 80082 an immunity standard. EN 50081 and EN 50082 provide limits for emission and immunity of electromagnetic disturbances from electrical and electronic apparatus (for which there are No dedicated product-family standards) intended for use in the industrial environment. “EMC Testing and Measurement Techniques Section 3: Radiated, Radio Frequency, EM Field Immunity Test” (IEC 61000-4-3) has been used for many years as the basic test standard for radiated electromagnetic field immunity testing in order to fulfill one of many EU requirements for the CE mark. The IEC 61000-4-3 standard is usually used together with a product standard that will specify this and other test standards, detailing the requirements the product must meet. The aim of this standard is to establish a common reference for immunity to radio frequency (RF)
178
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
radiation caused by any source. Electronic products need to be designed and tested to have immunity from these sources. “EMC Testing and Measurement Techniques Section 6: Immunity to Conducted Disturbances by Radio Frequency Fields” (IEC 61000-4) relates to the conducted immunity requirements of electrical and electronic equipment to electromagnetic disturbances from intended radio-frequency (RF) transmitters in the frequency range of 9 kHz to 80 MHz. Equipment without at least one conducting cable (such as a mains supply, signal line, or earth connection), which could couple the equipment to the disturbing RF fields, is excluded. The objective of this standard is to establish a common reference for evaluating the functional immunity of electrical and electronic equipment when subjected to conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fields. The test method documented in this part of IEC 61000 describes a consistent method to assess the immunity of a piece of equipment or system against a defined phenomenon.
10.3
Military Requirements The military environment is different from the commercial in the areas of radar transmissions, communications in a wide frequency range, electromagnetic pulses, and inner deck situations because of high equipment density. Until the publication of 461E, MIL-STD-461 documented the test limits and levels while MIL-STD-462 specified the test methods and procedures that were to be used for conducting the tests. The E version of this standard combined both standards into one document. Previous versions were A, B, C, and D. Table 10.5 shows the tests of Mil-Std 461E. Mil-Std 461 deals with two basic areas of electromagnetic effects: conducted and radiated. Each area is represented in two different modes—emission and susceptibility—which include conducted emissions, conducted susceptibility, radiated emissions, and radiated susceptibility. Different devices and components such as ships, weapons, aircraft, ground and support equipment, and electrical and electronic systems that are used in a military or aerospace application are subject to meeting the requirements established in Mil-Std 461. Each branch of the armed services—Army, Navy, Air Force, and NASA—have identified specific requirements that are applicable to the specific needs and applications. Not all tests are required for every application. Mil Std 461 uses shielded enclosures for testing. The shielded enclosure should be large enough to hold the equipment being tested and be equipped to handle the requirements needed to perform simulation tests. Mil-Std 461E is free of charge and can be downloaded for free on the Internet. 10.3.1 10.3.1.1
Specific Conducted Emissions Requirements Mil-Std 461E CE101—Power Leads (30 Hz to 10 kHz)
This level of low frequency testing is most applicable to the following platforms: submarines, Army, and Navy aircraft.
10.3 Military Requirements
179
Table 10.5
Tests of Mil-Std 461E
MIL-STD-461E Specific Conducted Emissions Requirements CE101
Power Leads (30 Hz to 10 kHz)
CE102
Power Leads (10 kHz to 10 MHz)
CE106 Antenna Terminals (10 kHz to 40 GHz) Specific Conducted Susceptibility Requirements CS101
Power Leads (30 Hz to 150 kHz)
CS103
Antenna Port-Intermodulation (15 kHz to 10 GHz)
CS104
Antenna Port Rejection of Undesired Signals (30 Hz to 20 GHz)
CS105
Antenna Port-Cross Modulation (30 Hz to 20 GHz)
CS109
Structure Current-Spike (60 Hz to 100 kHz)
CS114
Bulk Cable Injection (10 kHz to 200 MHz)
CS115
Bulk Cable Injection-Impulse Excitation
CS116 Damped Sinusoidal Transients (10 kHz to 100 MHz) Radiated Emissions Requirements Mil-Std 461E RE101
Magnetic Field (30 Hz to 100 kHz)
RE102
Electric Field (10 kHz to 18 GHz)
RE103 Antenna Spurious and Harmonic Outputs (10 kHz to 40 GHz) Radiated Susceptibility Requirements Mil-Std 461E
10.3.1.2
RS101
Magnetic Field (30 kHz to 100 kHz)
RS103
Electric Field (2 MHz to 40 GHz)
CE102—Power Leads (10 kHz to 10 MHz)
This is a similar test to CE101, but for higher frequencies. Additionally, this test has a much wider application and is required on the following platforms, systems, and subsystems: submarines; Army and Navy aircraft; air force aircraft; space systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems; and equipment surface ships. 10.3.1.3
CE106—Antenna Terminals (10 kHz to 40 GHz)
The CE106 testing is applicable to most antenna terminals, receivers, transmitters, and amplifiers, with the exception of equipment designed with the antenna permanently mounted to the equipment undergoing testing. CE106 has been recently modified to include amplifiers and is widely applicable and required on: submarines; Army and Navy aircraft; space systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems; and equipment surface ships. 10.3.2 10.3.2.1
Specific Conducted Susceptibility Requirements Mil-Std 461E CS101—Power Leads (30 Hz to 150 kHz)
The CS101 test is applicable to equipment and subsystems of AC and DC power leads, excluding returns. If EUT is operating under DC power, testing is required only between 30 Hz and 150 kHz. If EUT is operating under AC power, testing is
180
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
required to start at the second harmonic of the power frequency, and extends up to 150 kHz. These requirements are applicable on the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; army, navy, and air force ground systems. 10.3.2.2
CS103—Antenna Port-Intermodulation (15 kHz to 10 GHz)
The CS103 test is required for communications receivers, RF amplifiers, transceivers, radar receivers, acoustic receivers, and electronic ware receivers. The aim of this test is to control the response of the antenna connect receiving subsystems to in-band signals resulting from potential intermodulation products of two signals outside the intentional passband of the subsystems produced by the nonlinearity in the subsystem. The EUT should not exhibit any modulation beyond specified tolerances. The CS103 test is applicable to the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.2.3
CS104—Antenna Port Rejection of Undesired Signals (30 Hz to 20 GHz)
The CS104 test controls the response of antenna connected receiving devices or subsystems to signals outside the intentional passband produced by nonlinearity. The applications are similar to CS103, and are required for communications receivers, RF amplifiers, transceivers, radar receivers, acoustic receivers, and electronic ware receivers. CS104 can be applied to the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.2.4
CS105—Antenna Port-Cross Modulation (30 Hz to 20 GHz)
The CS105 test controls the response of antenna connected receiving subsystems to modulation being transferred from an out-of-band signal to an in-band signal. This can be caused by a strong out-of-band signal near the operating frequency of the receiver that modulates the gain in the front end of the receiver and adds amplitude varying in formation to the desired signals. The applications are similar to CS103 and CS104 and are required for communications receivers, RF amplifiers, transceivers, radar receivers, acoustic receivers, and electronic ware receivers. CS105 is applicable to the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.2.5
CS109—Structure Current-Spike (60 Hz to 100 kHz)
CS109 has limited applications and is intended to simulate a spike in voltage, according to which the EUT must continue to operate without malfunction, degradation of performance, or deviation, even beyond the accepted tolerance range. Most applications are within the area of submarines.
10.3 Military Requirements
10.3.2.6
181
CS114—Bulk Cable Injection (10 kHz to 200 MHz)
CS114 is widely applied to all interconnecting cables, including power cables. According to CS114, the EUT should not malfunction when subjected to a bulk injection probe drive level. CS114 is a requirement on the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.2.7
CS115—Bulk Cable Injection-Impulse Excitation
The CS115 test serves to protect equipment from fast rise and fall time transients that may be present due to platform switching and external transient environments, such as an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). The test will verify the ability of the EUT to withstand the impulse signals that are coupled onto the EUT associated cabling. This test replaces the old chattering relay test, referenced in Mil Std 461 C-RS 106. CS115 is applicable on the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.2.8
CS116—Damped Sinusoidal Transients (10 kHz to 100 MHz)
The concept of CS116 is to simulate electrical current and voltage waveforms occurring in platforms from natural resonances. CS116 is applicable to all electrical cables interfacing with the EUT and individually on each power lead. The testing should verify the EUT’s ability to withstand damped sinusoidal transients coupled onto the EUT associated cables and power leads. Power returns and neutrals need not be tested individually. The CS116 test is applicable to the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.3 10.3.3.1
Radiated Emissions Requirements Mil-Std 461E RE101—Magnetic Field (30 Hz to 100 kHz)
The RE101 testing requirement is intended to control magnetic fields for applications in which the equipment presents an installation potentially sensitive to magnetic induction to lower frequencies. This test verifies that the magnetic field emissions from the EUT and its associated electrical interfaces do not exceed specified requirements. A common example for this test is a tuned receiver that operates within the frequency range of the test parameters. The applications for this test are: submarines, surface ships, and Army and Navy aircraft. 10.3.3.2
RE102—Electric Field 10 kHz to 18 GHz
The RE102 test is one of the most widely required tests for electrical and electronic equipment. Its aim is to protect sensitive receivers from interference coupled through antennas associated with a receiver, and to verify that the electric field emissions from the EUT and its associated cabling do not exceed specified limits. The requirements vary depending on platform and application. The platforms
182
Emissions and Susceptibility—Radiated and Conducted
required to meet these test parameters are: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.3.3
RE103—Antenna Spurious and Harmonic Outputs 10 kHz to 40 GHz
The RE103 test is used to confirm that radiated spurious and harmonic emissions from transmitters do not exceed the specified limit requirements. RE103 has different starting frequencies depending on the actual operating frequency of the transmitters. The platforms required to meet this test are: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems. 10.3.4 10.3.4.1
Radiated Susceptibility Requirements Mil-Std 461E RS101—Magnetic Field (30 kHz to 100 kHz)
RS101 is primarily intended to ensure the performance of equipment potentially sensitive to low frequency magnetic fields. It is applicable to subsystems enclosures and electrical cable interfaces. It is not applicable to electromagnetic coupling via antennas. This test is required for the following platforms: submarines and Army and Navy aircraft. 10.3.4.2
RS103—Electric Field (2 MHz to 40 GHz)
The main purpose of RS103 is to ensure that the EUT will continue to operate without degradation in the presence of electromagnetic fields generated by antenna transmissions both on board and outside of the tested platform. According to RS103, the EUT should not exhibit any malfunction, degradation of performance, or deviation from the specified requirements. The requirements are applicable to equipment, subsystems enclosures, and all interconnecting cables. Most requirements are referenced up to 18 GHz, with an optional 40-GHz range. The field strength can vary depending on the specific requirements. This is a widely used test and is required on the following platforms: submarines; surface ships; space equipment and systems; Army, Navy, and Air Force aircraft; and Army, Navy, and Air Force ground systems.
Selected Bibliography Abrams, S., and C. R. Brown, “A Primer on Regulations and Standards,” Compliance Engineering, 1998. Altay, B., and S. S. Seker, “Application Tables for MIL-STD 461D Emission Tests,” Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 18–22, 1997, pp. 500–503. Björklöf, D., “EMC Standards and Their Application,” Compliance Engineering, 1999. “DoD Interface Standard, Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Emissions and Susceptibility,” MIL-STD-461E EMC, 1999. Dorey, P., “Gap Analysis of Military Standards for CE Marking,” Proc. EMCUK 2008, October 14–15, 2008, pp. 1–5.
10.3 Military Requirements
183
Klok, H. A., “Risk Analysis by the Use of Commercial Equipment in a Military Environment,” IEEE EMC Society Newsletter, Winter 2001. Smith, J., “EMI Testing for IEC 61000-4-3 Edition 3,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 50, No. 6, June 2007.
CHAPTER 11
Measurement Facilities Facilites used for measurement of susceptibility and emission, or interference include: full anechoic and semianechoic chambers, open area test sites (OATS), reverbation chambers, and transmission line structures; the two following are the most known: TEM and GTEM cells. OATS is the oldest and still the most accepted facility. Full and semianechoic chambers are mostly used for testing larger equipment and are generally the most expensive types of facilities. TEM and GTEM cells are mostly used for smaller equipment. The reverbation chamber can be almost any size.
11.1
Full Anechoic and Semianechoic Chambers The anechoic chamber is a facility used for testing with an electromagnetic field absorbing wall, thus creating an electromagnetic-field-free environment. In acoustics, anechoic rooms absorb sound; in RF, walls absorb electromagnetic radiation. The outer structure is the Faraday cage, which means that the interior of the room is quiet regarding RF radiation (i.e., there is no surrounding electromagnetic interference). Any radiation created inside the chamber cannot escape. For susceptibility testing, the floor must absorb the radiation (hence the name Full anechoic chamber), while for emission testing, the floor can be conductive (semianechoic chamber, see Figure 11.1). If the floor is removed, the chamber can be used for both types of measurements. Almost all chambers have ferrite absorber tiles, which can be used with pyramidal absorbers impregnated with carbon for the attenuation of radio waves. In early anechoic chambers only pyramidal absorbers were used for attenuation reflections, making the absorbers (approximately 1m long) effective only at frequencies from 100 MHz and above. Ferrite tiles are used for frequencies of 25 MHz and higher. For frequencies above 1 GHz, smaller absorbers (0.5m) are used in combination with ferrite tiles. In this way, the useful chamber range can rise up to 18 GHz. Furthermore, since the antennas in this frequency range have high directivity, the reflections are localized, and only a part of the wall has to be covered with the absorbers. The commercial chambers should have an area with uniformity of the field less or equal to 6 dB and attenuation of 4 dB. In Table 11.1 some types of anechoic chambers are presented. Anechoic chambers can have various dimensions. For testing susceptibility and precompliance testing, the room must be large enough to allow for a distance of 3m (1m for military style applications) between the antenna and the device under test (DUT). There should also be additional 1m between the antenna, DUT, and the
185
186
Measurement Facilities
Figure 11.1
Table 11.1
Full anechoic and semianechoic chamber.
Commercial Anechoic Chamber Size l × w × h (m) Standard
Type
Testing
Price (USD)*
Smallest (26 MHz–1 GHz) 7 × 3 × 3
IEC 61000-4-3 RF susceptibility, emission
$100,000
Small (26 MHz–18 GHz)
8×4×4
IEC 61000-4-3 RF susceptibility, emission GR-1089 mm
$120,000
3-m replica OATS (26 MHz–18 GHz)
9 × 6 × 5.5
IEC 61000-4-3 RF susceptibility, emission, ANSI C63.4 EUT up to 2m GR-1089 EN 50147
$300,000
5-m replica OATS (26 MHz–18 GHz)
11 × 7 × 5.5
Experimental (3m chamber)
$360,000
10-m replica OATS-a (26 MHz–18 GHz)
18 × 13 × 8
IEC 61000-4-3 RF susceptibility, emission, ANSI C63.4 large EUT GR-1089 EN 50147
RF susceptibility, emission, large EUT
$1,100,000
* Turning tables, cameras, and raising the floor can increase the price for an additional $15,000 USD.
room wall. The absorbing material must be placed on all six of the room walls. (For testing the emission, the floor can be movable.) Large chambers simulate 3-m or 10-m Open Area Test Sites (OATS), and must be high enough to place the antenna at 4-m height. Currently, 5m chambers (which are much cheaper), instead of the 10-m ones, are being experimented with. When building the chamber, cable filtering should be considered. If possible, optical cables should be used as well as other nonmetal interfaces. An access board with RF connectors should be as close as possible to the measurement equipment. The cables should be as short as possible. Thus, the necessary amplifiers for obtaining sufficient electromagnetic field levels will not have to be high in power, since they are very expensive. The cables should have as little attenuation as possible for a given frequency range. The door must be large enough for the biggest equipment, and should be sealed with gaskets and copper fingers to prevent leakage of electromagnetic fields in or out. In anechoic chambers, absorbers attenuate radio waves. It is desired that the incident wave continues traveling (i.e., to “see” the impedance, which is close to the one of free space). Such impedance has to be created, even though the metal wall impedance practically presents a short circuit. There are three methods for making
11.1 Full Anechoic and Semianechoic Chambers
187
the incident wave continue to travel: pyramidal absorbers, ferrite tiles, and Salisbury paper. First, only one frequency will be observed. At λ/4 from the wall, the impedance will be infinite (open end). The generator will “see” the short-circuited λ/4 transformer as an open end. At this point, the reflected wave will be shifted by one period and added to the incident wave. If the Salisbury paper (with free space impedance of 377Ω) is placed at a distance of λ/4 from the metal wall, the metal wall will disappear for this narrow frequency range (Figure 11.2). For a plane wave, this effect cannot be distinguished from the wave propagating in free space. If the susceptibility testing had to be performed only at this frequency, the construction of the anechoic chamber would not be a problem. However, the chambers must be designed for a frequency range of 80 MHz to 1 GHz or more. A possible solution is shown in Figure 11.3, in which several Salisbury papers with different surface resistances are placed at λ/4 distance from the metal wall. Placing papers in such an order results in a reflection coefficient less than 0.1 at the frequency range of 2.5 to 1 around λ. Is it possible to cover the airplane with paper of a 377Ω impedance, thus making it invisible to the radar? The answer is no. The total impedance would still be 377Ω in parallel to whatever impedance is below the Salisbury paper. 11.1.1
Absorbers
Pyramidal absorbers are just an expanded application of Salisbury papers. Many small reflections are created when the electromagnetic wave travels through the pyramid. Pyramids must be at least λ/2 long for the lowest frequency of interest (λ is even better). This is shown in Figure 11.4.
Salisbury paper 377Ω Metal wall
λ/4
Figure 11.2 Salisbury paper of impedance 377Ω placed at λ/4 from the metal results in the wall disappearing for the incident wave with a wavelength of λ.
188
Measurement Facilities
R = 1565Ω
R = 625Ω
R = 250Ω
Metal wall
3 Salisbury paper
λ/4
Figure 11.3
λ/4
λ/4
Several Salisbury papers for a larger frequency range of lower reflection.
µr = 1, εr = 2 − j1
λ/2 for lowest frequency Metal wall
Figure 11.4
Pyramidal absorbers as a practical application of Salisbury papers.
Pyramidal absorbers (Figure 11.5) in anechoic chambers are applied for susceptibility and emission testing as well as antenna calibration. Pyramidal absorbers are made of dense flexible foam and impregnated with carbon for obtaining the desired electrical characteristics. They are wideband and used in closed spaces. The pyramidal design enables multiple reflections of electromagnetic waves, while the carbon attenuates them through scattering and dissipation. The radio wave attenuation is around 45 dB.
11.1 Full Anechoic and Semianechoic Chambers
189
Base 60 cm
Figure 11.5
Pyramidal absorber.
Pyramidal absorbers are used in the frequency range of 80 MHz to 18 GHz; attenuation for a typical model is shown in Figure 11.6. 11.1.2
Ferrite Tiles
Ferrite tiles (Figure 11.7) can be used in combination with pyramidal absorbers (or recently even alone) for covering walls of anechoic rooms for attenuating radio waves. Ferrite tiles are resistant to fire, moisture, and chemicals. Compared with pyramidal absorbers (> 1m), they are much smaller (6 cm). The ferrite tile impedance must be 377Ω (i.e., the ratio of permeability and permittivity). However, this will not stop the reflection of the wave. The ferrite must be of a complex impedance (i.e., with losses for absorbing the electromagnetic wave energy). The typical attenuation for a ferrite tile of 1-cm width at 100 MHz is 11 dB, amounting to 22 dB in total (tile attenuates both the incident and reflecting wave).
Attenuation (dB) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0,01
0,10
1,00 f (GHz)
Figure 11.6
Attenuation of a pyramidal absorber.
10,00
100,00
190
Measurement Facilities
Metal wall Ferrite
Dielectric
Figure 11.7
Ferrite tile.
Figure 11.8 shows the basic principles of an electromagnetic absorber. When the electromagnetic wave travels through free space and reaches a medium of different characteristics, the wave will partially reflect and partially absorb. The reflected wave is more important. The ferrite tile thickness is chosen in such a way that the relative phase of the reflected and transmitted wave cancel each other out and create x
Et
Er
Reflected wave
Ht
Hr
z
yy Incident wave
Transmitted wave
Ei Hi
Material 1
Material 2 z=0 Metal
Figure 11.8
Incident, reflected, and transmitted waves.
11.2 Open Area Test Site (OATS)
191
a resonant state. It is a function that depends on the electric characteristics of ferrite materials such as relative permeability (µr) and permittivity (εr), which determine the reflection coefficient, impedance, and return loss according to the following expression and Table 11.2: Zf =
µr ⎡⎛ j2 πd ⎞ ⋅ tanh ⎢⎜ ⎟ εr ⎣⎝ λ ⎠
(
⎤ µr εr ⎥ ⎦
)
Ω
(11.1)
Figure 11.9 shows the attenuation of ferrite tiles depending on frequency. It is clear that ferrite tiles are best to use at frequencies from 10 MHz to several hundred megahertz.
Open Area Test Site (OATS) OATS is the oldest and still the most accepted test facility for acceptance of results. Compared to anechoic chambers, it is much cheaper to build. OATS should be placed close to the production site, but in a quiet RF surrounding. These two different requirements are often opposite. Furthermore, when selecting a location, international standards need to be checked. It is desirable to use numerical modeling methods before building.
Table 11.2
Magnetic Characteristics
Permeability µr
2,100
Curie temperature Tc > 95°C 6
Resistance ρ
5 · 10 Ωcm
Specific density
5.2 g/cm
Linear coefficient
3
−6
9 · 10 /ºC
0
10
20
A (dB)
11.2
30
40
50 10
Figure 11.9
100 f (MHz)
Ferrite tile attenuation depending on frequency.
1000
192
Measurement Facilities
Figure 11.10 shows the schematics of OATS. Distance F depends on the test condition. The antenna should be able to move vertically in order to find the strongest signal (due to reflections from the ground). The ellipse dimension can be 3, 10, or 30m. The space above the ellipse should be free, without reflecting surfaces. In case of precipitation, a dielectric roof is allowed. The emission from the equipment under test (EUT) has to be measured with an appropriate receiver and antenna. Figure 11.11 shows the position of EUT and antenna. The antenna should be able to move vertically 1m to 4m. The turntable must be able to turn 180°. The distance between EUT and the antenna can be 3m or 10m. Ferrites are placed on the cable going to the spectrum analyzer or test receiver. Perfect OATS should have an infinite ground without metal objects in the vicinity (fence, power cables, and so forth). To be able to use OATS in all weather conditions, it is desirable to build a protection roof resistant to weather conditions. The walls and roof should be made of dielectric materials, since they have less impact on higher frequencies.
2F
Receiving antenna
Movable
Receiver
F
1.73
EUT
F Ellipse boundary
Figure 11.10
Schematics of an open area test site.
3 or 10 m
Ferrites on cable
EUT Turntable
1–4m 80 cm
Ground plane
Figure 11.11
Placement of EUT and the antenna.
11.3 Reverberation Chamber
193
The reflection coefficient from the vertical incident wave to the thin wall is: r =
πl( ε r − 1)
(11.2)
λf
where l is the wall thickness (m), εr is the permittivity of the wall, and λf is the wavelength in free space. If the reflection coefficient is to be less than 0.1 (typical value) at 1 GHz (λf = 0.3m), then the acceptable width l for a given, nonferrite, nonconductible wall is: l=
03 . ⋅ 01 . 001 . ≈ π( ε r − 1) ε r − 1
(11.3)
The basic modular design of OATS is shown in Figure 11.12. The structure is raised from the ground. When making a study, the attenuation of OATS can be affected by the following parameters: • • • •
Ground size; Boundary conditions of the ground and surrounding terrain; Influence of moisture in different types of soil; Conductivity of soil as a function of temperature.
The size of the EUT can be up to 2F/λ (Rayleigh criteria). Surface irregularities must be within ± 20 mm. The antenna should be placed at a 1–4-m height for obtaining the highest field level. It is also necessary to perform detailed ambient field measurements before building the OATS.
11.3
Reverberation Chamber The reverberation chamber (Figure 11.13) is a relatively new type of facility for testing emission and susceptibility. It consists of a plain shielded chamber with low loss walls. It should not radiate outside, does not contain absorbers, and can be of any size. On resonant frequencies, the reverberation chambers are resonators with a large Q factor. Inside the chambers mode tuners are built in, which change boundary conditions inside the chamber, thus ensuring that the EUT is exposed to a full energy amount and that all of the EUT emissions can be measured. Statistically, uniform and isotropic wave propagation with uniformly distributed polarization occurs. Testing in a reverberation chamber can be performed on frequencies above
Ground
Figure 11.12
Raised ground—side look.
Ground
194
Measurement Facilities
Figure 11.13
Reverberation chamber.
the cutoff frequency (i.e., in the area where modes can exist inside the chamber). The Q factor can be calculated from Q=
3 V ⋅ 2 Sδ
(11.4)
where V is the chamber volume, S is the surface of inner walls, and δ is the wall thickness (skin effect): δ=
1 πfσµ
(11.5)
3
Reverberation chambers are usually from 75 to 100 m , although they can be much smaller. They are used for testing at frequencies higher than 200 MHz (up to 18 GHz). Working with frequencies below 200 MHz requires very large rooms. For frequencies above 1 GHz, smaller chambers can be used (volume ~ 0.25 m3). The shape of the chamber is irrelevant—different designs prove quite good. The volume is the key factor. Around 50% of the volume is useful for testing, which is more than with other types of chambers. Mode tuners or propellers (Figure 11.14) are made of four equal boards turning around a vertical axis. The turning of the tuners is regulated by step motors and microcontrollers, which must be placed outside of the room. Step motors and microcontrollers should not conductively be coupled with the interior of the chamber. Reverberation chambers can only measure the isotropic radiation of EUT and not the electrical field at a certain distance, which is often required in international standards. The price of a reverberation chamber (6.55m × 5.85m × 3.50m) with the lowest usable frequency of 124 MHz is about $50,000.
11.4 TEM Cell
Figure 11.14
11.4
195
Mode tuners.
TEM Cell The appearance of the TEM cell (or Crawford cell) in 1974 intensified testing in the fields of electromagnetic compatibility, biomedical effects, and electromagnetic disturbances. The first TEM cell, still in use, underwent many improvements. The TEM cell is a simple and economical surrogate for Open Area Test Systems. The test system should have an area with no outside interference, and at the same time a uniform electromagnetic field inside. With increasing frequency, the cell dimensions get smaller, thus becoming too small for testing larger devices, except for possibly printed circuit boards. The goal of technical improvements to various cell types is increasing useful test area for higher frequencies using absorbers, obtaining a field as uniform as possible, and avoiding the appearance of higher-order modes of propagation. This is not a simple task and requires a lot of numerical modeling, use of various numerical methods, and testing of prototypes. In the meantime, TEM-cells have been acknowledged as standardized test systems for electromagnetic compatibility and interference testing. Research is ongoing; new absorption materials are being developed and new geometrical structures tried. Transversal electromagnetic (TEM) transmission cells are devices used for establishing uniform electromagnetic fields in a shielded environment. They are structures with three closed transmission lines for preventing radio frequency radiation and electrical isolation. The TEM cell is made of a quadrature transmission line with pyramidal parts at the ends for adapting to standard coaxial connectors (Figure 11.15). A uniform TEM field is established inside the cell on any desired frequency below the cutoff frequency, at which higher-order modes start to appear. TEM cells are used for testing small equipment, calibrating of radio frequency probes, and biomedical experiments. The wave propagating through the cell has a wave impedance equal to free-space impedance (377Ω), thus enabling a good approximation of a planar wave in a far field. The cells are wide bandwidth and have linear phase and amplitude frequency characteristics from the DC to the cell cutoff frequency. This feature enables testing with a continuous wave (CW) or over a selected frequency range, as well as with a
196
Measurement Facilities Septum Outer shield Coaxial termination
Coaxial connector
RF source
EUT
Figure 11.15
TEM cell.
pulse or modulated signal. The cell has its limitations—the main being that the upper cutoff frequency is determined solely by the physical dimensions of the cell. This results in limitations on the DUT size. The expression for obtaining the electrical field in the cell, where V is the voltage on the septum, b/2 is the distance from the septum to the cell wall, P is the power level introduced into the cell, and Z0 is the characteristic impedance of the cell, is defined as follows: E=
11.4.1
V = b2
PZ 0 b2
(11.6)
Characteristic Impedance
Characteristic impedance of the symmetrical stripline, which has a metal shield at the sides (Figure 11.16), is given with the values of cross section dimensions and unknown edge capacitance over the unit length Cf´: Z0 =
[
3766 .
(11.7)
]
4 w (b − t ) + C f′ ε
−12
where ε0 = 8.852 · 10 , with an air dielectric. For a central conductor with small thickness, Cf ε
=
⎡ t 2b ⎛ π a − w⎞⎤ ln 1 + coth ⎜ K ⎟ + ⎝ 2 b − t ⎠ ⎥⎦ a − w π(b − t ) ⎢⎣
a
g t
Figure 11.16
TEM cell cross section.
w
g
b/2
b/2
(11.8)
11.4 TEM Cell
197
The upper expression is valid for (a w)/2b < 0.4. The Crawford cell (and other TEM cells) is designed to have a characteristic impedance of 52Ω. This value is chosen because when inserting a DUT, the characteristic impedance will drop slightly. 11.4.2
Higher-Order Modes
The basic restriction of the TEM cell is the appearance of resonances, which destroy the uniform field distribution of the TEM mode of wave propagation. There are numerical methods for establishing the cutoff frequency of the higher-order modes as a function of septum (inner conductor) width. The determination of the resonant cell length is not simple, because the cell pyramidal parts are acting differently at each higher-order mode. The TEM cell is a resonant cavity with a high Q, where the higher-order modes tend to appear at exactly determined frequencies. There is a window between these resonances where the use of the TEM cell is still possible. To which degree these structures can be used with the presence of higher-order modes and whether it is possible to use them between these resonances will depend on the practical implementation for which the cell is desired. Generally, the cutoff frequency in a perpendicular waveguide for TE10 mode, which is usually the first higher-order mode that starts to propagate, is given with the following expression: f c (TE10 ) =
c 2a
(11.9)
where c is the speed of light. The expression for the cutoff frequency for any higher-order mode TEmn is as follows: f c (TE m , n ) =
(
c b 2 m2 + a 2 n 2
)
12
2ba
(11.10)
where a and b are the dimensions of the waveguide cross section and m and n are the number of half-periods of the electric field in the x- and y-axes. The TEM mode propagates through pyramidal parts of the cell without any significant change. Every higher-order mode is always reflected at the same place of the pyramidal part until it becomes too small to propagate. The energy of propagation of the higher-order mode suffers from repeated reflections inside the cell until it exhausts itself. The resonant conditions are fulfilled when the effective cell length for a particular mode is equal to the number of half-lengths (p = 1, 2, 3, ...), p being the number of half wavelengths. On resonant frequencies, fR(mnp), there is a resonant field of the TEmnp mode. If we use the expression: l ( mn ) = pλ g ( mn ) 2 ;
p = 1, 2, 3
(11.11)
and 1 1 1 = 2 + 2 2 λ λg λ c ( mn )
(11.12)
198
Measurement Facilities
where λ2c (cm) represents the value of wavelength at the cutoff frequency, the following expression, which predicts various resonant frequencies, can be obtained: f
2 R ( mnp )
=f
2 c ( mn )
⎛ pc ⎞ ⎟ +⎜ ⎜ 2l ⎟ ⎝ ( mn ) ⎠
2
(11.13)
with f c (mn ) = c/ λ2c (mn ) . Spreading of the useful frequency range of the cell can be achieved by filling the cell with absorbers. It will lessen the quality factor (Q) inside the cell, which is frequency dependent. The absorbers improve the uniformity of the field between the septum and upper and lower walls, thus increasing the vertical component of the electric field on edges of the septum. Higher-order modes have a special influence on the TEM cells. Their appearance disrupts the uniformity of the electromagnetic fields inside the cell. The first higher-order mode depends solely on cell dimensions. After the first higher-order mode, the other higher-order modes starts to appear. The cell can be used even after higher-order modes start to appear. In the following text, a calculation of the higher-order modes according to experimental equations is shown. Higher-order modes have two characteristic frequencies: cutoff and resonant. For every mode, the expression for the cutoff frequency is as follows: f c ( m, n) =
x ⎛c⎞ ⎜ ⎟ 2π ⎝ b⎠
[Hz]
=
150 x π b
[MHz]
(11.14)
8
where c = 3 × 10 m/s, and where x depends on the mode and is given later. The appropriate resonant frequency is determined by: f
2 R ( m, n, p)
=f
2 c ( m, n)
⎛ pc ⎞ +⎜ ⎟ ⎝ 2 L mn ⎠
2
(11.15)
where Lmn is the effective cell length for every mode, L mn = L c + X mn L E
(11.16)
and Lc is the length of the central section of the cell, and LE is the length of the two pyramidal ends. Xmn is an empirically defined multiplier. Table 11.3 gives the equations for calculating cutoff frequencies of higher-order modes. 11.4.3
TEM Cell Construction
The TEM cell (like most other cells) should be designed to have a characteristic impedance of 52Ω. When the TEM cell was designed at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb (FER), its future purpose was taken into consideration (biomedical experiments, probe calibration, and electromagnetic compatibility). The aim was to achieve as much space as possible for testing at the frequency of 900 MHz, and sustain the characteristic impedance of the cell of 50Ω
11.4 TEM Cell
199 Table 11.3 Expressions for Calculating the Cutoff Frequencies of Higher-Order Modes Mode TE01
Expressions x tan x = RTE 01 =
TE10 TE11
⎤ π ⎛ b ⎞ ⎡ ⎛ 2a ⎞ ⎟ + RTE 01 ⎥ ⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ln ⎜ 2 ⎝ a ⎠ ⎣ ⎝ πg ⎠ ⎦ 1⎛
∞
∑ p ⎜⎝ coth
p =1
−1
⎞ pπ b ⎛ pπ g ⎞ − 1⎟ cos 2 ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ a ⎠ ⎠ a
π ⎛ b⎞ x= ⎜ ⎟ 2 ⎝a⎠ x=
⎡ 2 ⎛ πb ⎞ 2 ⎤ ⎢y + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ ⎝ 2a ⎠ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦
y tan y =
⎤ b ⎡ ⎛ 8a ⎞ π 2 ⎛ πg ⎞ ⎟ − 2 cos ⎜ ⎟ + RTE 11 ⎥ ⎢ ln ⎜⎝ ⎝ ⎠ g π ⎠ ⎛ ⎞ a πg 2a ⎦ cos 2 ⎜ ⎟ ⎣ ⎝ 2a ⎠
−1
(2 p + 1)πb − 1⎞⎟ cos 2 ⎛ 2 p + 1 πg ⎞ 1 ⎛⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ coth ⎟ ⎝ 2a ⎠ 2 p 1 2a + ⎝ ⎠ p =1 ∞
RTE 11 = 2 ∑ TE02
x=π
TE12, TM12
2 ⎡ ⎛ b⎞ ⎤ x = π ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ ⎝ a2 ⎠ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦
TE20 TE21
x=π
b a
cot x + x
⎛ πg ⎞ 2 cos 2 ⎜ ⎟ cot y ⎝ a ⎠ ⎤ 2 a ⎡ ⎛ 2a ⎞ 2 ⎛ πg ⎞ = ⎟ − cos ⎜ ⎟ + RTE 21 ⎥ ⎢ ln ⎜ ⎝ a ⎠ y π b ⎣ ⎝ πg ⎠ ⎦ 1
2 ⎡ ⎛ b⎞ ⎤2 y = ⎢x2 − ⎜ π ⎟ ⎥ ⎝ a⎠ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦ ∞ ⎞ ⎛ pπ b ⎞ 1⎛ pπ b − 1⎟ cos 2 ⎜ RTE 21 = ∑ ⎜ coth ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ a ⎠ p a p=2
TM11
1
2 ⎡ ⎛ πb ⎞ ⎤ 2 x = ⎢ y2 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ ⎝ 2a ⎠ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦ 2 ⎤ tan y 2 a ⎡ ⎛ 2 a ⎞ = ⎢⎜ ⎟ + 1 − RTM 11 ⎥ y π b ⎢⎣ ⎝ πg ⎠ ⎥⎦
RTM 11 =
−1
(2 p + 1) + b − 1⎤ J ⎡(2 p + 1)πg ⎤ 4a ∞ ⎡ ⎥ ⎥ 1⎢ ∑ ⎢ coth 2 a πg p = 1 ⎣ 2a ⎦ ⎦ ⎣
at the same time, which was difficult to achieve. The usual cell dimensions are a > b (i.e., the cell is wider than it is tall). The value a < b was chosen, which provided for more space in the vertical dimension. This resulted in the change of the characteristic impedance from 50Ω to 75Ω. Even though most network analyzers and signal generators operate at 50Ω, the adaptation can be achieved through a 50/75Ω transformer. Figure 11.17 shows the blueprints for the TEM cell designed at FER.
200
Measurement Facilities 12.5 cm
25 cm
12.5 cm
BNC connector
25 cm
Septum 3.5 cm gap
18 cm
25 cm
Guide holes
30 cm
Door
Dielectric supporters
Figure 11.17
Scheme of the TEM cell.
The size of the device that can be tested in the cell is 5 cm high, which is 1/3 of the total TEM cell height. The cell is made of aluminum, whereas the septum is made of 1.5-mm-thick copper; any metal available is acceptable. The connectors are BNC, and from the sides there are doors to insert the DUT. There are openings for the wires below the doors. The septum is supported with dielectric material (Teflon). The cell can withhold up to 50W without cooling. Since it is made of aluminum, it is very light for carrying and handling. 11.4.4
Parameter Measurements
The TEM cell was tested at the Department for Radiocommunications with Network Analyzer HP 8620B. VSWR (Figure 11.18) transmission characteristics (Figure 11.19) were measured and the Smith chart (Figure 11.20) was obtained as a result. Transformers 50/75Ω were used for adaptation. At the frequency of 935 MHz, VSWR was measured to be only 1.06 and absorption 4.5 dB. Characteristic impedance was 80.8 − j0.92Ω, which should be higher than 75Ω because it will drop once the DUT is inserted in the cell. To ensure the field inside the cell, a probe is necessary. This will be discussed in the following chapters. Figure 11.21 shows the photograph of the TEM cell built at FER.
11.5 GTEM Cell
201 3.5
VSWR
3 2.5 2 1.5 1 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Frequency (MHz)
Figure 11.18
VSWR of the TEM cell.
8
Absorption (dB)
7 6 5 4 3 2 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Frequency (MHz)
Figure 11.19
11.5
Absorption of the TEM cell.
GTEM Cell The GTEM cell is a transmission line based on the TEM cell approach. The letter G stands for gigahertz, since the GTEM cell operates from DC to 18 GHz. The slightly curved wave front (not a planar wave) travels from the source to the 50Ω quadratic shielded transmission line (radial type) to the hybrid termination without geometrical distortion of the TEM wave. This transmission line can be symmetric or nonsymmetric (the latter being more frequent), in order to obtain a more useful testing area. Symmetrical transmission lines are also called coaxial. Since the waveguide incident angle is small (20°), the wave can be considered planar. The GTEM cell is an adaptable (pyramidal) part of a quadratic transmission line (TEM cell) with a characteristic impedance of 50Ω. The GTEM cell (Figure 11.22) starts with a precise apex, where the transition from the standard 50Ω N-type connector to a nonsymmetrical quadratic waveguide is done. The distributed load consists of absorption material used for the termination of the electromagnetic wave, and of distributed resistance used for terminating low frequency currents. On low frequencies, the cell has an impedance of 50Ω. At higher frequencies, the absorber attenuates the incident wave in much the same way as in the anechoic chamber. Thus, the matching from DC to several gigahertz is achieved. Wideband performance, which is enabled by termination load, lowers the influence of higher-order modes. The absorbers significantly reduce the quality factor of
202
Measurement Facilities
Figure 11.20
Smith chart of the TEM cell.
Figure 11.21
TEM cell developed at FER.
11.5 GTEM Cell
203
Figure 11.22
GTEM cell.
the cell, thus lessening the influence of resonances. The TEM mode generated with a continuous source or pulse generator simulates the planar wave for testing emission and susceptibility. 11.5.1
GTEM Cell Characteristics
GTEM cell characteristics (Figure 11.23) are: • • • • •
Characteristic impedance of 50Ω; Septum at 3/4 of the cell height (for larger EUT); Width/height ratio of 2/3; 15° angle between the septum and the lower shield; 5° angle between the septum and the upper shield.
The N-type connector is placed at the end of the pyramidal part. The septum is supported with dielectric material. On the other side of the cell, there is a distributed termination. The DUT size can be 1/3 of the size between the septum and shield. 11.5.2
GTEM Cell Construction
Figure 11.24 shows the schematic of the GTEM cell built at FER, Zagreb. The septum, as well as the shielding, is made of copper. The N-type connector is placed at the beginning of the pyramidal end. 2w g
g
2b
2a
Figure 11.23
GTEM cell cross section.
204
Measurement Facilities
Door 20×20cm
Septum
38,5 cm
N-type connector
115 cm 60 cm
Figure 11.24
GTEM cell blueprint.
Dielectric supporters of the septum are made of Teflon. On the other side of the cell there are pyramidal absorbers of 25 cm for matching electromagnetic waves and two parallel 100Ω resistors for current termination. The EUT size is 20 cm × 20 cm. The cell is designed in such a way as to enable replacement of pyramidal absorbers with ferrite (or some other more efficient absorbers) in the future. In this way, more testing area is obtained. The N-type connector can also be easily replaced in case of damage. The resistance array of 100Ω can also be replaced, or instead of two 100Ω resistors some other combination of resistors can be introduced (6 × 300Ω, for example). Figure 11.25 shows the GTEM cell cross section. The outer measures are slightly different from the inner due to the side connecting on edges. The sides are connected with silver. 11.5.3
GTEM Cell Parameter Measurement
The GTEM cell must be tested for its voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), transmission characteristics (reflection), and time-domain measurements.
10 mm
600 mm inner
10 mm
400 mm
620 mm
Figure 11.25
Cross section of GTEM cell.
11.5 GTEM Cell
205
Figures 11.26 to 11.29 show the VSWR and reflection from 1 GHz to 20 GHz. The resistors have more influence on lower frequencies, but their influence weakens greatly after 100 MHz. After 500 MHz their influence is negligible and absorbers start dominating above that frequency. Figure 11.30 shows the time-domain response of the GTEM cell. The higher magnitude levels are due to reflections at the connector and dielectric supporters along the stripline. 11.5.3.1
Measuring Electric Field Strength Inside the Cell
In the FER project the measuring of the electric field was carried out with the radio frequency signal generator HP 8656A (0.1–1,040 MHz), amplifier MiniCircuits 28 dB (100–900 MHz), probe Holaday HI-4455, and readout device HI-4460. HI-4460 is a graphical device for reading the values of electromagnetic fields, and it has a screen made of crystals for displaying numerical and graphical values. The device can be connected to a computer through a RS232 interface. Probe HI-4455 is a battery-operated wide-bandwidth isotropic probe for measuring the electric field in the vicinity of the RF source. The application includes measuring microwave transceivers and antennas, and monitoring electromagnetic interference (EMI). The probe uses optical isolation for keeping field changes low during measurements and has a conical casing and sensor inside. The sensor is placed on one end of the support, while the other part is connected to the electronics. With three orthogonally placed dipole antennas, the probe measures the field intensity in three directions, calculates the sum, and sends the results to the receiver over an optical cable. The frequency response is from 200 kHz to 40 GHz, whereas the dynamical range is from 1.5 to 300 V/m. 2.00
VSWR
1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
f (GHz)
Figure 11.26
VSWR up to 1 GHz of the GTEM cell.
3.50
VSWR
3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.00
5.00
10.00 f (GHz)
Figure 11.27
VSWR up to 20 GHz of the GTEM cell.
15.00
20.00
206
Measurement Facilities
Reflection (dB)
0.20 0
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
15.00
20.00
−5 −10 −15 −20 −25 −30 f (GHz)
Figure 11.28
Reflection up to 1 GHz of the GTEM cell.
0.00 0
5.00
10.00
Reflection (dB)
−5 −10 −15 −20 −25 −30 −35 f (GHz)
Figure 11.29
Reflection up to 20 GHz of the GTEM cell.
Magnitude
0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.0
0.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
t (ns)
Figure 11.30
Time-domain response of the GTEM cell.
Figure 11.31 shows the field distribution inside the GTEM-cell at 1/2 of the septum height—100 MHz. It is obvious that the measurements are in concordance with the modeled values (FEM method). The field was measured at different locations: the middle and at the edges of the cell. Figure 11.32 shows the frequency response of the GTEM cell in the middle of the area reserved for testing with an input power of 40 dBm. It is obvious that the results are within 3 dB.
11.5 GTEM Cell
207
5.2 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.8
Measured
4.7 4.6 4.5
Num. method
4.4 4.3 4.2 0.0
Figure 11.31
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Field distribution inside the GTEM cell at 1/2 of the septum height (100 MHz).
E (db/(V/m)
1000 100 10 1 100
Figure 11.32 40 dBm.
11.5.3.2
f (MHz)
1000
Measured electric field strength inside the GTEM cell with an input power of
Higher-Order Modes
Higher-order modes do not play such an important role with GTEM cells as with TEM cells, because the GTEM cell is not a high Q factor cell. Higher-order modes are attenuated and therefore hard to measure. There are analytical calculation equations of higher-order modes, which are valid only for the first several modes since the absorbers have a high influence at higher frequencies. Higher-order modes appear due to dimensions change, nonuniform mediums of absorbers, and finite conductance of the walls. In the vicinity of the N connector higher-order modes cannot propagate, but when moving along the septum axis, the possibility of their appearance increases. The modes stimulated by the TEM mode are called essential. Other modes, stimulated by disturbances or small discontinuities, do not achieve large amplitudes and are called nonessential. The first several modes that can propagate in the GTEM cell are H01(TE01), H10, H11, and H20, and after them E11 and E22. Even though mode H01 is the first to start propagating, the first essential mode is H10. (Regarding resonances in the GTEM cell, it is the most important one.) In nonuniform waveguides, transversal fields are the functions of the z coordinate (i.e., the direction of wave propagation). They can be expressed with the following vector functions:
208
Measurement Facilities
Htr ( x , y, z ) =
r
∞
∑ I ( z )h ( x , y, z ) i
i
i =1
r Etr ( x , y, z ) = ∑ Vi ( z )e i ( x , y, z ) ∞
(11.17)
i =1
r r The vectors h i and e i for TE and TM modes can be expressed as: r (E) r (E) = −n z × ∇ tr T h
r (E) (E) = −∇ tr T e
r (H ) r (H ) = −n 2 × ∇ tr T e
T
(E)
and T
(H)
r (H ) (H ) = −∇ tr T h
(11.18) (11.19)
fulfill differential equations and boundary conditions: ∇ tr2 T T
(E)
T
(E)
=0
(11.20)
= 0 on L( z )
(E)
∇ tr2 T
(E)2
+ kc
(H )
(H )
∂T ∂n
(H )2
+ kc
T
( HE )
=0
(11.21)
= 0 on L( z )
where L is the boundary curve of the cross section. Putting (11.18) into the Maxwell equations, the following system of differential equations is obtained: ∞ dVk = − γ k ( z )Z Lk ( z )I k ( z ) + ∑ C ki ( z )Vi ( z ) dz i =1 ∞ γ k (z) dI k =− V k ( z ) − ∑ C ki ( z ) I i ( z ) dz Z Lk ( z ) i =1
(11.22)
The nonuniform waveguide can be regarded as the system of coupled transmission lines, where the coupling factors Cik are the functions of z. Field strengths can be expressed with voltages Vk and currents Ik. This equations system is known as telegraphic equations. The characteristic impedance values of ZL and spreading constant γ are given in Table 11.4. Separating one equation from the other (11.22), the Schroedinger equation for calculating higher-order modes is obtained: (E)
d 2 Ik dz
2
(H )
d 2 Vk
dz 2
− kc
(
(E)2
( z ) − k 2 )I k( E )
(
(H )2
( z ) − k 2 )Vk( H )
− kc
=0
=0
(11.23)
(11.24)
for E (TM) modes (11.23) and H (TE) modes (11.24), where Vk and Ik are equivalent voltages and currents of the electromagnetic field inside the waveguide.
11.5 GTEM Cell
209 Table 11.4
Values of ZL and γ for TE and TM Modes
TE Modes γ
(E )
ZL( γ(
)
E
E
(z) =
)
=
TM Modes ( E )2
kc
(z) − k
γ(
2
1 E 2 k2 − kc( ) ( z ) ωε
( z )ZL( )( z ) = E
ZL(
(
1 E 2 kc( ) ( z ) − k2 jωε
)
γ
( z ) = jωε (E ) ZL ( z ) γ(
E
H
)
H
(z) = )
H
(H
γ(
)
)
= ωµ
kc(
H )2
( z ) − k2 1
k2 − kc(
H )2
(z)
( z )Z )( z ) = jωε
)
(H L
( z ) = 1 k( H )2 z − k2 (c () ) ( z ) jωε
(H )
ZL
The propagation constant in every cross section can be expressed as γ k (z) =
γ
(E,H )
kc2 ( z ) − k 2
⎧ real k 2 < kc2 ⎪ is ⎨ 0 k 2 = kc2 ⎪ imaginary k 2 < k 2 c ⎩
(11.25)
(11.26)
If γ is real, the mode will attenuate and (11.23) and (11.24) describe the wave that is attenuated. If γ is imaginary, the mode is above the cutoff frequency and Schroedinger equations describe the propagating wave. Local cutoff frequencies can be calculated according to the following expression: fc =
kc 2 π εµ
=
kc c 2π
(11.27)
where kc is the wave number. For most TEM cells, the product of the wave number and the width of the cell are constant: kc ⋅ a = konst
(11.28)
By solving (11.23) and (11.24), the expression for resonant frequencies of the higher modes is obtained. For the GTEM cell, where kca = konst, the cross section of the cell changes linearly in the direction of wave propagation. The boundary curve can be described with a( z ) = mz + a( z = 0)
(11.29)
Using (11.25) the following is obtained: 2 ⎛ ⎞ d 2 V ⎜ ( konst 2 ) 2⎟ − − k V =0 2 ⎜ ⎟ dz 2 ⎝ (mz + a(0)) ⎠
where konst is different for every mode. If a replacement is introduced:
(11.30)
210
Measurement Facilities
a = mz + b ⇒
2 (3 4)b d2 2 d m m= = 2 2 l dz da
(11.31)
Equation (11.31) takes a special form of the Bessel differential equation 2 ⎞ d 2 V ⎛ C1 ⎜ − − C 22 ⎟ V = 0 2 2 dz ⎝α ⎠
(11.32)
where k2 ⎛ k 2 a⎞ C12 = ⎜ c ⎟ i C 22 = 2 ⎝ 2m ⎠ m
(11.33)
By solving the Schroedinger equation, the following is obtained: V
(H )
= A1
⎛ ⎝
( mz + b ) J v ⎜ k⎛⎜⎝ z +
b ⎞⎞ ⎟⎟ ; v = m⎠ ⎠
1 ⎛ kc a ⎞ +⎜ ⎟ 4 ⎝ 2m ⎠
(11.34)
where m is the ratio of opening b and cell length l. Jv are the zero points of Bessel functions and constant A1 can be obtained by solving the telegraphic equations. Figure 11.33 shows the amplitudes of the first, second, and third resonance in the GTEM cell (made at FER) obtained by a specially developed software. For a GTEM cell, the following is valid:
•
Opening height in regard to width, b/a = 2/3; Septum height of 3/4b;
•
Septum thickness in regard to opening height t/b = 0.004;
•
Septum width in regard to opening width w/a = 0.65; Cell length l.
•
•
The values of kca are given in Table 11.5. By solving (11.34) for mode H10, three resonant frequencies are obtained, stim(H) ulated by the cutoff frequency of that particular mode at 249.614 MHz: f101 = (H) (H) 406.01 MHz; f102 = 558.28 MHz; f103 = 602.34 MHz. H01, which is the first
Table 11.5 Values of kca Depending on the Propagation Mode MOD
kc a
H01
2.640
H10
3.138
H11
5.418
H20
6.281
E11
6.002
E21
8.699
11.5 GTEM Cell
211 0.20
f r1 f r2 f r3
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 −0.05 −0.10 −1.2
−1.0
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0.0
z Figure 11.33
H01 amplitudes of the first, second, and third resonances in the GTEM cell.
propagating mode (but actually the second mode), has the cutoff frequency of (H) 210.085 MHz, from which the following resonant frequencies appear: f011 = (H) (H) 362.03 MHz; f012 = 509.16 MHz; f013 = 650.21 MHz. For other modes, the resonant frequencies are even higher and the absorber influence is stronger above 450 MHz. 11.5.4
Current Distribution at Septum
The resistance influence is more important at lower frequencies and can be neglected above 500 MHz. It is important to determine where to place the resistors; the VSWR must be kept in mind, and field must be uniform. This is why the resistors are placed closer to the septum edges, so that the currents in this area flow close to the edges and do not contribute to the nonuniformity of the field in the area designated for testing. The testing area should be 25 to 45 cm away from the absorbers inside the cell. Placing the resistors close to the middle of the septum results in a worse VSWR at lower frequencies. The nonuniformity of the field increases as well. It is not important that the currents flow, but that they flow parallel with the septum edges (Figure 11.34). Figure 11.35 presents a photo of the GTEM cell built at FER.
Testing area
Good
Figure 11.34
Current flow in the septum.
Not good
212
Measurement Facilities
Figure 11.35
GTEM cell built at FER.
Selected Bibliography Crawford, M. L., “Generation of Standard EM Fields Using TEM Transmission Cells,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. EMC-16, No. 4, November 1974. Crawford, M. L., J. L. Workman, and C. L. Thomas, “Expanding the Bandwidth of TEM Cells for EMC,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. EMC-206, No. 3, August 1978. Hill, D. A., “Bandwidth Limitations of TEM Cells Due to Resonances,” Journal of Microwave Power, Vol. 18, June 1983, pp 181–195. Koch, M, and H. Garbe, “Analytische und Numerische Parameterstudien in TEM/Zellen rechteckformigen Querschnitts,” Proc. Elektromagnetische Vertraglichkeit, Deutschland: VDEVerlag Gmbh, 1998, pp. 255–262. Koenigstein, D., Hansen, D., “A New Family of TEM-Cells with Enlarged Bandwidth and Optimized Working Volume,” Proc. 7th Zurich Symp. and Techn. Exh. on EMC, March 1987, pp. 172–132. Malaric, K., and J. Bartolic, “TEM Cell with 75Ω Impedance for EMC Measurements,” Proc. IEEE 1999 Int. Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Volume 1, August 2–6, 1999, Seattle, WA, pp. 234–238. Malaric, K., J. Bartolic, and B. Modlic, “Absorber and Resistor Contribution in the GTEM-Cell,” Proc. IEEE 2000 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 21–25, 2000, Washington, D.C., pp. 891–896.
11.5 GTEM Cell
213
Malaric, K., J. Bartolic, and B. Modlic, “TEM-Cell with Increased Usable Test Area,” Proc. International Conference on Telecommunications—ICT ‘99, Vol. 2, June 15–18, 1999, Cheju, Korea, pp. 370–374. Morgan, D., A Handbook for EMC Testing and Measurement, London, U.K.: Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1994. Nahman, N. S., et al., “Methodology for Standard Electromagnetic Field Measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. IM-34, No. 4, December 1986. Weil, C. M., “The Characteristic Impedance of Rectangular Transmission Lines with Thin Center Conductor and Air Dielectric,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-26, No. 4, April 1978. Weil, C. M., and L. Gruner, “High-Order Mode Cutoff in Rectangular Striplines,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. MTT-32, No. 6, June 1984. Wilson, P. F., et al., “Simple Approximate Expressions for Higher Order Mode Cutoff and Resonant Frequencies in TEM Cells,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. EMC-28, No. 3, August 1986. Wilson, P., F. Gassmann, and H. Garbe, “Theoretical and Practical Investigation of the Field Distribution Inside a Loaded/Unloaded GTEM Cell,” Proc. 10th International Zurich Symposium on EMC 1993, Zurich, Switzerland, 1993, pp. 595–598.
CHAPTER 12
Typical Test Equipment Interference into a piece of equipment or a system can be radiated or guided. While test facilities for radiated emission were covered in Chapter 11, in this chapter more attention will be paid to guided coupling. Coupling is performed either through capacitance or inductance. Typical test equipment includes: a line impedance stabilization network (LISN), coupling capacitors, coupling transformers, a parallel plate for a susceptibility test, coupling clamps and probes, injection clamps and probes, an EMI receiver, spectrum analyzers, and oscilloscopes.
12.1
LISN—Line Impedance Stabilization Network A line impedance stabilization network (LISN) is a device for direct coupling with equipment under test (EUT). It is also called an artificial mains network (AMN) and is used to measure distortion signals on the mains cord of electrical EUTs and come in many types. Distortion signals are usually generated or picked up inside the EUT and the mains cord acts as an antenna. European and international EMC regulations define maximum permissible signal levels and frequency bands for such distortion signals (CISPR 16-1-2, MIL-STD-461D and E). For testing, LISN is placed between the power source and the equipment (device) to be tested during electromagnetic interference testing on power lines. Since the input impedance depends on frequency, LISN stabilizes the impedance at 50Ω. Furthermore, LISN filters the radio frequency noise from the mains supply. Finally, LISN transfers the conducted interference voltage produced by EUT to a spectrum analyzer or EMI receiver. LISN (Figure 12.1) is used for measuring the guided RF signal from the mains to the EUT. Every LISN has a low pass filter for rejecting noise on cables, as well as an effective voltage transient limiter to protect sensitive analyzers or receivers from a strong energy shock. Large capacitors and inductors absorb unwanted noise energy and practically electrically isolate the EUT from the power mains. In this way, no unwanted guided noise from the power mains can enter the EUT, and vice versa. Thus, only the noise generated by the EUT will be measured by the spectrum analyzer or EMI receiver. LISN is usually placed on a metallic board near the EUT (Figure 12.2). The EMI receiver is connected to the measuring port via a quality coaxial cable. Measuring unused LISN outputs are matched with 50Ω. LISN is widely used in commercial and military applications for electromagnetic compatibility measurements. However, it is frequency limited. It can be used in the frequency range of 150 kHz to 30 MHz, although some models can be used at frequencies as high as 400 MHz.
215
216
Typical Test Equipment
50 µH
To main s source
To EUT 8 µF
0,25 µF To 50Ω load or to 50Ω input of meter
5Ω
Figure 12.1
1 kΩ
LISN schematics.
LISN for every line EUT
Grounded board
AC or DC port
Matching the unused line with 50Ω
Figure 12.2
12.2
Coaxial cable 50Ω
Input impedance 50Ω
Setup for measuring guided emission using LISN.
Coupling Capacitor The coupling capacitor is used for testing spike voltages. Their typical value is 10 µF, which represents the known RF impedance on mains. Furthermore, it prevents undesirable frequencies from contaminating the power source (Figure 12.3). 10 µF capacitors should sustain voltages of up to 600-V DC and currents of up to 100A without significant losses.
Transient generator Osciloscope
EUT 10µF
Figure 12.3
Testing spike voltage.
10µF
12.3 Coupling Transformer
217
Coupling capacitor dimensions are usually 0.85 × 0.85 × 0.7 cm. The attenuation of the RF signal on frequencies from 100 kHz to 1 GHz is approximately 60 dB.
12.3
Coupling Transformer The coupling transformer is usually used to provide isolation of the power line from the main voltage. It should be connected parallel instead of with a serial connection, because the high current through the transformer can cause magnetic saturation of the transformer core. The values of R and C and the ratio of the transformer (Figure 12.4) depend on the data rate, power, and signal frequency. In industry, coupling transformers are used for ADSL, HDSL, VDSL, cables, and modems. Coupling transformers can prevent RF energy from entering the acoustic cables and are used in the frequency range from 30 Hz to 250 kHz.
12.4
Parallel Plate for Susceptibility Test The parallel plate is used for radiated susceptibility tests from transient electromagnetic fields. The susceptibility of an EUT is the ability to withstand transient electromagnetic fields. The parallel plate is shown in Figure 12.5. Its physical characteristics are width, w, and height, d. Characteristic impedance Z0 depends on the frequency, f, resistance, R, inductance, L, conductance, G, and capacitance, C, per unit length as shown: R + j2 πfL G + j2 πfC
Z0 =
(12.1)
where C
R
N1 :N2
L1
Input
Figure 12.4
L2
Coupling transformer.
Conductor Dielectric
d
Conductor w
Figure 12.5
Parallel plate.
Output
218
Typical Test Equipment
R=
2
(12.2)
ωσ cond δ
L= µ
d ω
G = σ diel C=ε
(12.3)
ω d
(12.4)
ω d
(12.5)
σcond and diel are the conductivities of the conductor and dielectric; µ and ε are permeability and permittivity of the dielectric. Skin depth, δ, is defined as: δ=
1
(12.6)
πfµσ cond
The parallel plate should be designed to have an impedance of 50Ω. The setup for testing susceptibility using the parallel plate is shown in Figure 12.6. Beside the plate, other necessary instruments include: a high voltage probe, a transient generator (ordinary monopulse), and a storage oscilloscope with a 200-MHz minimum single shot bandwidth and variable sampling rate up to 1 Gsa/s.
12.5
Coupling Clamps and Probes Coupling clamps and probes are used in EMC testing, especially in emission testing. Emission testing is used to establish how much a certain device is emitting (or radiating). Immunity test are used to establish how immune the device is to interference Load High voltage probe
Parallel plate line Transient generator
Sensor
Shielded enclosure
Oscilloscope
Figure 12.6
Susceptibility setup with parallel plate line.
12.5 Coupling Clamps and Probes
219
or outside radiation. Therefore there are instruments which measure the emission through capacitive or inductive coupling. They are usually not used for injecting the interference. The injection clamps or probes will be dealt with in the following section. 12.5.1
Capacitive Coupling Clamp
The capacitive coupling clamp is an instrument used for measuring conducted electromagnetic interference where there is no galvanic connection between the coupling clamp and the measured cables. The work principle of a coupling clamp is based on the capacity coupling that can exist between the measured cable and the clamp; it is used in testing cable resistance to fast transient sources like arcing on cable connectors when connecting the voltage network or ESD. If there is a source of continuous electromagnetic waves, the coupling clamp may be used for measuring the cables resistance. The capacitive coupling clamp conforms to the requirements of ISO 61000-4-4. It guarantees that tests are carried out in strict compliance with the standard. A coupling clamp with its physical characteristics is shown in Figure 12.7. The clamp allows fast nanosecond pulse bursts (ISO 3a and 3b) to be injected in cable runs. The characteristic impedance of the unit is 50Ω. The coupling clamp is fitted with appropriate BNC connectors at both sides and is connected to the generator via a coaxial cable. The far side of the clamp has to be terminated with a 50Ω load resistor. It also provides a measurement output via a 40-dB attenuator. The coupling clamp can test cables of up to a 40-mm diameter and is actually a distributed capacitance. The effective coupling capacitance depends on the cross section and the material of the cable used, a typical value being around 100 pF. Inside the capacitive coupling clamp, where the cable is placed, an electric field exists; this results in capacity coupling. The time varying electrical field of an external system produces time varying charges in the disturbed system. For the capacitive coupling probe built at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb (Figure 12.8), the maximum coupling frequency is around 100 MHz, as it is with most models.
70
Coupling plates
0m
High voltage coaxial connector
Figure 12.7
100 mm
m
High voltage coaxial connector
mm
14
70
mm
1000 mm
Insulating supports
1050 mm
Capacitive coupling clamp dimensions.
220
Typical Test Equipment
Figure 12.8
12.5.2
Capacitive coupling clamp built at FER, Zagreb.
Current Probe
The current probe is a precision EMI measuring sensor, which clamps onto a wire, coaxial line, or cable carrying intentional or interference current. The diameter dimension is 5–10 cm. It is used to measure the current in a single wire, wire pair, coax, or bundle. Current probes are used on frequencies from 5 Hz to 1.2 GHz. Current probes are an excellent diagnostic tool, especially for locating and quantifying ground loops. When measuring the currents in cables or wires, the wires having the highest current often point to a solution, which can be: breaking ground loops or increasing their impedance by isolating or floating, applying ferrites, using bypass capacitors, applying a single-end grounded shield, or using filtered connectors. An important characteristic of current probes is transfer impedance. It is used for calibration. Figure 12.9 shows indirect measuring of the unknown current by measuring the voltage developed across a 50Ω load placed on the current probe’s coaxial cable (or input impedance of a spectrum analyzer). The computed unknown current, IdB µA, in units of dB µA equals the measured voltage, VdB µV, in units of dB µV minus the probe’s transfer impedance in units of dB (dB above an Ω per meter length): I dBµA = VdBµV − Z TdBΩ
(12.7)
The spectrum analyzer/EMI receiver can measure up to several mA of current. The principle is shown in Figure 12.10. There is a magnetic field around the wire through which the current flows. The ferrite core of the current probe concentrates this flow. At the current probe output, a voltage depending on permeability, ferrite core cross section, and the number of coils will appear: Vout = kµANfI in
Figure 12.9
Current probe.
(12.8)
12.6 Injection Clamps and Probes
Magnetic field around the wire
221 Output to EMI Vout receiver
Test coil
H = 1/2πr
I in
I in
Current through wire
Figure 12.10
Cable current principle of work.
where Vout is the output voltage, k is the constant, µ is the core permeability, A is the core cross section, N is the coil number, f is the frequency, and Iin is the wire current. Toroidal ferrite concentrates the field around the wire of EUT using the test coil. When constructing a current probe, it is necessary to install electrostatic shielding to prevent capacitive coupling between the coil and the EUT wire.
12.6
Injection Clamps and Probes Beside emission tests, there are also immunity tests in which EUT is tested with outside interference. The instruments for introducing interference into the EUT are called injection clamps or probes. They use capacitive or inductive coupling. The method is usually quite simple but includes large losses. It is used only when LISNs are not available. 12.6.1
Current Injection Probe
The current injection probe is a method for injecting interference in immunity testing. It is simple, but relatively ineffective. It has high coupling losses (i.e., large power is necessary, and the results are hardly repeatable). It is recommended only if no other method is available or practical. As a transformer, the probe introduces only inductive coupling with no capacitive coupling (Figure 12.11). There is no isolation from other equipment, which is a serious drawback. The voltage on the EUT will depend on cable resonances at higher frequencies. Furthermore, the parasitic capacitance between the probe and the cable will influence the local cable impedance. Thus, even though it is not necessary to ground the probe for the coupling, it is useful to ground its casing to the ground reference plane to lower this effect. The probe has losses of about 5 dB. It is used in the frequency range of up to 400 MHz. Usually a high power amplifier (200W) is necessary to perform the tests. 12.6.2
EM Clamp
The EM clamp (Figure 12.12) is a tube made of slotted ferrite rings, which can be connected to a cable under test. It is not invasive and can be used on any cable type.
222
Typical Test Equipment Current injection probe Inductive coupling
EUT
Auxiliary equipment
Ground reference plane Generator
Figure 12.11
Injecting interference using a current injection probe.
Figure 12.12
EM clamp.
There are types with both inductive and capacitive coupling, which are used in the frequency range of 150 kHz to 1 GHz. However, this method is not as good as LISN. The losses are not high and it is not necessary to use a high power amplifier as is the case with the current injection probe. It is desirable to ground the clamp for better repeatability of test results. The clamp (ferrites) can also be used as a coupling clamp for emission tests, in which the clamp absorbs interfering signals from the cable. The setback is that for every testing frequency it is necessary to move the clamp along the cable, which can take a lot of time. Tests are almost impossible to perform automatically and have to be done manually. Table 12.1 shows the necessary power (in watts) for achieving 3 V/m and 10 V/m for different methods of injecting interference into the EUT. The best are the LISN and EM clamps; the current injection probe is recommended only if there are no other methods available.
12.6 Injection Clamps and Probes
223
Table 12.1
Necessary Power (W) LISN
10 kHz
12.6.3
Current Injection Probe
EM Clamp
3V
10V 3V
10V
3V
10V
—
—
—
—
585
6,500
150 kHz
0.59
6.5
1.46 16.25 29.32
27 MHz
0.59
6.5
0.94 10.4
4.21
325.78 46.8
80 MHz
0.59
6.5
0.59
6.5
4.62
51.35
230 MHz
0.59
6.5
0.59
6.5
5.85
65
Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Generator
Electrostatics discharge from the human body to a device or discharge between two devices can lead to interference or destruction of sensible electronic devices. The generated voltages can be up to several kV. Electrostatic discharge is characterized by a fast rise time (1 nanosecond), and intense discharge from humans, clothing, furniture, and other charged dielectric sources. The discharge resistance of humans may vary from several hundred ohms to 10 kohms. There are portable generators for testing ESD (IEC 1000-4-2, EN 61000-4-2), which can generate 50,000 pulses of 16.5 kV in the air and 10 kV in contact. They simulate ESD from a human or furniture. An ESD gun or generator is a hand-gun-shaped instrument containing a capacitor (typically about 150 pF—simulating a human), which can be charged up from 1 kV to 15 kV (sometimes more). One or more discharge resistors (approximately 1,500 ohms) and pulse-shaping networks acheive the undesired output waveform. The waveform (Figure 12.13) is characterized by a subnanosecond rise time and a current value of a few amperes. Figure 12.14 shows an equivalent circuit of the
Imax 90% I at 30 ns I at 60 ns
10% 0.7–1 ns 60 ns
30 ns
Figure 12.13
Waveform of an ESD generator.
R
C
Figure 12.14
ESD generator circuit (R = 330Ω, C = 150 pF).
224
Typical Test Equipment
generator. The resistance-capacitance network would produce a zero rise time. For generating the waveform, the actual ESD gun has a series inductance (due to the return current ground cable), which is responsible for the finite rise time in the current waveform. For the ESD experiment (Figure 12.15), the discharge could not be performed directly on the PCB trace because the gun-radiated field would have coupled to the traces, which could not be modeled. The model considers an impulsive transverse electromagnetic mode (TEM) wave reaching the victim trace where the suppressor is mounted. Although this condition can be realized by connecting a coaxial cable to the PCB and performing the discharge at the beginning of the cable, it must be done inside a shielded room to avoid propagation of the gun-radiated field. The PCB traces are then connected to a 1-GHz oscilloscope to capture the structure’s response to the ESD. The corresponding response time of the oscilloscope should be 0.35 nanosecond—sufficiently lower than the rise times.
12.7
EMI Receiver The EMI receiver measures conducted emissions using an LISN or current probe, and radiated emissions using antennas according to international standards (CISPR 16-1). They measure RF signals with high accuracy. At the input, they have tunable preselectors for overload protection, bandwidth selection, tuning capability, and several detector functions. Tunable preselectors are passive filters that split pulsed signals into different frequency bands. At low frequencies these filters increase the size and weight of the EMI receiver in comparison to the spectrum analyzer. Measurements are performed on one frequency at a certain time, but some models can be programmed to sweep the frequency spectrum and record the results automatically. For covering the frequency range of 20 Hz to 40 GHz, at least three receivers are required. The most common digital interfaces are: RS232, Centronics, Ethernet, IEC-Bus (IEC625-2/IEEE 488-2), PS2-Keyboard, PS2-Mouse, USB, Userport, and VGA connectors. Impulse generators are used for broadband calibration of EMI receivers. However, most EMI receivers have internal built-in calibrating impulse generators. The main specifications of the EMI receiver include: interference, selectivity and shape factor, adjacent-channel interference, spurious response, intermodulation, cross-modulation, quasi-peak, peak and average value, frequency range at −6 dB, PC
Oscilloscope
Shielded room PCB
ESD generator
Figure 12.15
ESD measurement setup.
12.8 Spectrum Analyzer
225
time constants of charging and decharging, selectivity, intermodulation product limitation, noise limitation, and accuracy. The main advantages of an EMI receiver versus a spectrum analyzer are better sensitivity, durable circuitry, higher accuracy at measuring frequency, and amplitude, as well as higher dynamics.
12.8
Spectrum Analyzer Spectrum analyzers are less expensive than EMI receivers and usually do not have an RF preselector. They have a higher noise figure (less sensitivity), less dynamic range for broadband emissions (such as an impulse generator), fewer detector functions, and less shielding in the case housing. Low-noise RF preamplifiers, preselectors, and CISPR quasi-peak adapters are optional. The spectrum analyzer usually has a tracking generator, several half-decade bandwidth selections, scan rate/bandwidth interlocks, and data storage for statistical manipulation. Similar to EMI receivers, spectrum analyzers measure the frequency and amplitude of electromagnetic signals in the frequency domain, but are used for different purposes. EMI receivers are used for distortion-free measurement of noncontinuous RF signals, while spectrum analyzers are used for high frequency, fast sweep, and continuous signals. EMI receivers respond properly to pulsed signals, which would overload a spectrum analyzer’s input circuitry (especially those with a low pulse repetition rate). The advantage of spectrum analyzers is that they can be very small, which is useful for design and diagnostic purposes. Cheap models have fewer functions and are used only for precompliance testing, while more sophisticated models can be used for the final compliance testing. With a current probe, the spectrum analyzer can be used to measure conducted emissions.
12.9
Oscilloscopes An oscilloscope is a test instrument that displays waveforms of electronic and electrical circuits. In the past, oscilloscopes consisted of a cathode-ray tube and components that directed the electron beam based on the voltage of the input signal (vertical) and the scan produced by a time base (horizontal). Today most oscilloscopes are digital. A digital oscilloscope converts the analog input signal into digital form (a series of binary numbers), which is then displayed or stored in memory. The ability to store waveforms is especially important for viewing one-time events. The oscilloscope is usually used with its probe. Probes usually have built-in 10:1 attenuators. More sophisticated oscilloscopes have broadband amplifiers for measuring voltage in submillivolt levels.
Selected Bibliography C.I.S.P.R., “Specification for Radio Disturbance and Immunity Measuring Apparatus and Methods,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
226
Typical Test Equipment Cormier, B., and W. Boxleitner, “Electrical Fast Transient (EFT) Testing—An Overview,” Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 12–16, 1991, pp. 291–296. De Leo, R., F. Moglie, and V. M. Primiani, “Analyzing ESD Transient Suppressors in Printed Circuits,” Compliance Engineering, 2001. Dipak, L., D. L. Sengupta, and V. V. Liepa, Applied Electromagnetics and Electromagnetic Compatibility, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2006. Morgan, D., A Handbook for EMC Testing and Measurement, London, U.K.: Peter Peregrinus Ltd., 1994. Kaires, R.G., “Stopping Electromagnetic Interference at the Printed Circuit Board,” Conformity, November 2003, pp. 12–21. Radman, S., I. Bacic, and K. Malaric, “Capacitive Coupling Clamp,” International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, SOFTCOM, Split, CD-ROM, 2008. Reinhold, L., and P. Bretchko, RF Circuit Design: Theory and Applications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000. Sakulhirirak, D., V. Tarateeraseth, and W. Khanngern, “The Analysis and Design of Line Impedance Stabilization Network for an In-House Laboratory,” Proc. 2006 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics, August 2006, pp. 232–234. Sklar, B., Digital Communications: Fundamentals and Applications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001. Smith, D., “Current Probes, More Useful Than You Think,” Proc. 1998 IEEE International Symposium on EMC, 1998, pp. 284–289.
CHAPTER 13
Control of Measurement Uncertainty 13.1
Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty Measurement uncertainty is a parameter associated with the result of a measurement that characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. Uncertainty expresses doubt about the result of a measurement. The real value of a measured quantity can never be known exactly—it can only be estimated. The true value lies inside the uncertainty interval with a certain degree of probability (level of confidence). For most cases the sufficient level of confidence is 95%, obtained with coverage factor k = 2 (for k = 1 the level of confidence is 68%—one standard deviation). The evaluation of standard uncertainty is defined either by statistical analysis of a series of observations (i.e., repeatable measurements) (type A), or by systematic components of uncertainty (type B). For combining uncertainty components of the measurement, a probability density function (pdf) must be chosen for each uncertainty component. If the uncertainty component has random errors (electrical noise, connector repeatability), then the pdf usually has a normal (Gaussian) distribution. For systematic errors (from the manufacturer’s data sheet) rectangular (uniform) distribution is used, while uncertainties in measurements at microwave frequencies (phase influence) are best described with a U- shaped distribution. 13.1.1
Type A Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty
When evaluation of uncertainty is done by statistical analysis of a series of observations, then it is called a type A evaluation. In this type of evaluation, standard uncertainty of a measurand is calculated from a series of repeated observations. Even if for some measurements the random component of uncertainty is not relevant to other contributions of uncertainty, it is desirable to establish the scale of random effects on the measurement process. The average or mean value of the measurements should be calculated. If there are n independent repeated values for a quantity Q, then the mean value q is obtained by q=
q + q2 + q3 K qn 1 n qj = 1 ∑ n j =1 n
(13.1)
227
228
Control of Measurement Uncertainty
The measured results will be spread over a certain range, which depends on various factors, such as: measurement method, measuring device used, and even the person making measurements. The resulting dissipation is defined as standard deviation σ σ=
1 n ∑ qj − q n j =1
(
)
2
(13.2)
The above expression gives the standard deviation σ for the particular set of n measurements. If the process is repeated at some later time, with a different number n of measurements, different values of q and σ will be obtained. For a very large n, the mean value will approach the central limit of the distribution of all possible values. The probability density function will have a normal distribution. From the results of a single set of measurements and their standard deviation, σ, an estimate for all possible values of the measurand s(qj) can be made with
( )
s qj =
1 n ∑ qj − q n − 1 j =1
(
)
2
(13.3)
The mean value q is obtained from a finite number n of measurement results; the mean value is not the exact mean that would have been obtained if an infinite number of measurements could have been taken. Therefore, even the mean value has its uncertainty, which is called the standard deviation of the mean. Its value can be obtained from the estimated standard deviation using s( q ) =
13.1.2
( )
s qj n
(13.4)
Type B Evaluation of Standard Uncertainty
The type B evaluation is defined as all uncertainty other than repeatable measurement uncertainty. It is associated with systematic errors. The evaluation of these contributions depends on previous experience, the measurement process, manufacturer specifications, calibration data, and the environment. When all possible systematic components of uncertainty are identified, probability distributions should be assigned to them. Although probability distributions can be of any form, the most common ones for the type B evaluation of standard uncertainty are the rectangular (uniform) and U-shaped distributions.
13.2
Distributions The three most common distributions for the evaluation of uncertainties are normal (Gaussian), rectangular, and U-shaped. While normal distribution is used for the type A evaluation, rectangular and U-shaped distributions are used for the type B evaluation.
13.2 Distributions
13.2.1
229
Normal (Gaussian) Distribution
Normal distribution is shown in Figure 13.1. The distribution size is described with the standard deviation. The shaded area represents 1 standard deviations from the center of distribution. This is approximately 68% of the area under the curve. This means that for coverage factor k = 1 there is a 68% probability that the measurement value is in this range. Table 13.1 shows the coverage probability versus coverage factor. In some situations it is necessary to use a higher coverage factor for a higher probability. Usually p = 95% (k = 1.96 or 2.00) is enough. The values xi of the input quantities Xi all have their uncertainties, u(xi), which are called standard uncertainties. Standard uncertainty for a normal distribution is equal to the standard deviation of the mean [i.e., s(q )]: u( x i ) = s( q ) 13.2.2
(13.5)
Rectangular Distribution
A rectangular distribution (Figure 13.2) is used for a measuring instrument with an accuracy of ±x or ±dB without any statistical information. The result may lie anywhere between −x to +x with equal probability. Outside of this range the probability of xi is zero. This distribution is used for type B evaluations. For some instruments the resolution will be a = 0.5 of the least significant digit. When there is no previous knowledge about the measurement quantity, rectangular distribution must be used. Standard uncertainty for a rectangular distribution is calculated from
Table 13.1 Coverage Probability Depending on the Coverage Factor Coverage Coverage Probability p (%) Factor k 68%
1.00
90%
1.64
95%
1.96
95.45%
2.00
99%
2.58
99.73%
3.00
68%
Figure 13.1
Normal (Gaussian) probability distribution.
230
Control of Measurement Uncertainty a
a
Probability p
xi − a
Figure 13.2
Rectangular distribution.
u( x i ) =
13.2.3
xi + a
xi
ai
(13.6)
3
U-Shaped Distribution
Since measurements at microwave frequencies often involve vector quantities (both magnitude and phase), it is sometimes necessary to use a U-shaped distribution (Figure 13.3). This distribution is most commonly used for the RF mismatch uncertainty where the phase information for a given vector is unknown. Mismatch uncertainty occurs when there is no perfect matching of impedance between the source and load (termination). If the phase is unknown, the cosine function will determine the probability distribution. With this function, xi will probably be closer to one of the edges of the distribution rather than in the center. Standard uncertainty for a rectangular distribution is calculated from u( x i ) =
13.2.4
ai
(13.7)
2
Combined Standard Uncertainty
When different input uncertainties are combined, the normal distribution will be used. Since normal distribution is described with standard deviation, all input uncertainties have to be evaluated and combined with their sensitivity coefficients
xi − a
Figure 13.3
U-shaped distribution.
xi
xi + a
13.3 Sources of Error
231
to form the normal distribution. The standard uncertainties, xi, and their sensitivity coefficients, ci, will give a single value to be associated with y of the measurand Y. The combined standard uncertainty will then be: u c ( y) =
m
∑c i =1
2 i
u2 ( x i ) ≡
m
∑ u ( y) 2 i
(13.8)
i =1
When one contribution dominates, the resulting contribution will be very similar to the dominating one. With the excepting of a few cases, the resulting contribution will usually be normal, no matter what the contribution distribution is. 13.2.5
Expanded Uncertainty
When purchasing measurement equipment, a calibration certificate usually quotes an expanded uncertainty, U, with a high coverage probability. Using coverage factor k, the standard uncertainty can be calculated as follows: u( x i ) =
13.3
U k
(13.9)
Sources of Error There are two types of measurement errors: random and systematic. Random errors are evaluated in type A evaluations and are normally distributed as shown above. Systematic errors are evaluated in type B evaluations and can shift the mean value (probable value) and add an uncertainty. 13.3.1
Stability
All instrument performance changes with time; the value of resistors changes and microwave attenuators drift, which is evaluated by calibration. The drift is most likely not linear. The data over time should be displayed graphically and the most probable value selected. 13.3.2
Environment
Temperature and humidity can affect the performance of attenuators, power sensors, and other equipment. Therefore, measurements should be performed in laboratory conditions with defined temperature and humidity. 13.3.3
Calibration Data
Usually, calibration points are limited. Sometimes quantity values other than the calibration point have to be measured, at which systematic errors can occur. If possible, calibration should be performed with some other calibration instrument, or the value prediction can be made from other similar models’ data.
232
Control of Measurement Uncertainty
13.3.4
Resolution
Another systematic error of the measuring device is the digital rounding error. A quantization error of ±0.5 is present, since the measured value is converted from analog to digital. Noise in the system can cause fluctuations of the last digit as well. 13.3.5
Device Positioning
The position between the measuring instrument and the device under test can also lead to systematic error. There could be leakage currents to Earth as well as electromagnetic leakage fields. Mutual heating can be avoided by placing the instruments farther apart. 13.3.6
RF Mismatch Error
Characteristic impedance mismatch of the measurement transmission line is one of the most common systematic errors in power and attenuation measurements because the phases of voltage reflection are usually unknown, making it hard to make the corrections.
13.4
Definitions The terms described in this chapter are given in the “ISO Guide to the Expression System of Uncertainty Measurement,” “IEEE Std 100-1988,” and in “International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology.” For definitions, please see the Glossary.
Selected Bibliography Agilent Technologies, “Application Note 64-1B, Fundamentals of RF and Microwave Power Measurements Classic Application Note on Power Measurements,” 2000. Bronaugh, E., and J. Osburn, “A Process for the Analysis of the Physics of Measurement and Determination of Measurement Uncertainty in EMC Test Procedures,” Proc. IEEE 1996 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 19–23, 1996, p. 245. “CISPR 16-4-2 (Ed.1.0). Specification for Radio Disturbance and Immunity Measuring Apparatus and Methods—Part 4-2: Uncertainties, Statistics and Limit Modeling—Uncertainty in EMC Measurements,” IEC Standard, November 2003, p. 43. Heise, E. R., and R. E. W. Heise, “A Method to Calculate Uncertainty of Radiated Measurements,” Proc. IEEE 1997 Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, August 18–22, 1997, p. 359. “International Vocabulary of Metrology—Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM),” ISO/IEC Guide 99, 2007. Kurosawa, T., et al., “Study on Measurement Uncertainty in Immunity Testing: IEC61000-4-6,” Proc. Electromagnetic Compatibility and 19th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, May 19–23, 2008, pp. 598–601. Ridler, N., et al., “Measurement Uncertainty, Traceability, and the GUM,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 4, August 2007, pp. 44–53.
13.4 Definitions
233
Taylor, B. N., and C. E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Tech. Rep. TN1297, Gaithersburg, MD, 1994.
Appendix A Communication Frequency Allocations A.1 Frequency Allocation in the United States 218–219-MHz Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
218–2,190
—
—
—
700-MHz Guard Service (Digital TV) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
746–747 762–764 776–777 792–794
—
3650–3700-MHz Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
—
3.650–3.700
Access Broadband over Power Line (BPL) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
30–80
—
—
—
Advanced Wireless Services Including 3G 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
1,710–1,755 1,915–1,920 1,995–2,000 2,020–2,025 2,110–2,180
—
235
236
Appendix A Amateur Radio 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
50–54 144–148 219–220 222–225
47.0–47.2 76–81 122.25–123.0 134–141 241–250 275–300
420–450 902–928 1,240–1,300 2,300–2,310 2,390–2,450
3.3–3.5 5.650–5.925 10.0–10.5 24.0–24.25
Auditory Assistance Devices 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
72–73 74.6–74.8 75.2–76 216.75–217
—
—
—
Automatic Vehicle Identification Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
2,900–3,000
3.0–3.26 3.267–3.332 3.339–3.3458 3.358–3.6
Auxiliary Broadcasting 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
54–72 76–108 152.855–154 157.45–161.575 161.625–161.775 162.0125–173.2 174–216
76–81
450–454 455–456 470–608 614–806 944–960 2,025–2,110 2,450–2,483.5
6.425–6.525 6.875–7.125 12.7–13.25 17.7–18.3 19.3–19.7
Aviation/Aeronautical 30 MHz–300 MHz
300 MHz–3,000 MHz3 GHz–30 GHz 30 GHz–300 GHz
72–73 74.6–75.2 108–137 156.2475–157.0375
328.6–335.4 849–851 894–896 960–1,215 1,300–1,350 1,435–1,525 1,535–1,660.5 2,310–2,320 2,345–2,395 2,700–3,000
3.5–3.65 4.2–4.4 5.00–5.25 5.35–5.46 9.0–9.2 13.25–13.4 15.4–15.7 24.75–25.05
32.3–33.4
Appendix A
237 Basic Exchange Telephone Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
152–159
—
450–460 816–820 861–865
—
Biomedical Telemetry Devices 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
174–216
—
470–668
—
Broadband Radio Service/Educational Broadband Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
2,495–2,690
—
Cable TV Relay 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
2,025–2,110
6.425–6.525 6.875–7.125 12.7–13.25 17.7–18.3 19.3–19.7
Cellular Services 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
824–849 869–894
—
Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
—
5.85–5.925
Digital Audio Broadcasting 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
1,452–1,492 2,310–2,360
—
Differential GPS 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
108–117.975
—
1,559–1,610
—
238
Appendix A Family Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz —
3 GHz–30 GHz 30 GHz–300 GHz
462.5625–467.7125 —
—
Field Disturbance Sensors 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
57–64
902–928 2,435–2,465
5.785–5.815 10.500–10.550 24.075–24.175
Fixed Microwave 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
31–31.3 37–39.5 42–42.5 71–76 81–86 92–94 94.12–95
928–929 932–935 941–960 1,850–2,000 2,110–2,180 2,450–2,483.5
3.7–4.2 5.925–6.875 10.55–10.68 10.45–10.68 10.7–11.7 12.2–13.25 17.7–18.3 19.3–19.7 21.2–23.6 24.25–24.45 25.05–25.25 27.5–29.5
Fixed Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
30–31 37.5–42 42.5–45.5 47.2–50.2 50.4–51.4 71–76 81–86 123–130 158.5–164 167–174.5 209–226 232–240 265–275
1,390–1,392 1,430–1,432
3.6–4.2 4.5–4.8 5.15–5.25 5.85–7.075 7.25–7.75 7.9–8.4 10.7–12.2 12.7–13.25 13.75–14.5 15.43–15.63 17.3–21.2 24.75–25.25 27.5–30
Appendix A
239 FM Broadcasting 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
88–108
—
—
—
General Aviation Air-Ground Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
454.675–454.975 459.675–459.975
General Mobile Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
462–467
—
Industrial/Business Radio Pool 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
25–50 72–76 150–174 216–220
—
406–413 421–430 450–470 470–512 800 900
3.4–3.6
Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Applications (ISM) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
40–42
59.3–64 116–123 241–248
902–928 2,400–2,500
5.65–5.925 24.0–24.25
Location and Monitoring Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
902–928
—
Low Power Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz 30 GHz–300 GHz 216.75–217
—
—
—
Lower 700 MHz Services (Digital TV) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
698–746
—
240
Appendix A Maritime 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
154–161.625 161.775–173.2 216–220
—
454–455 456–460 1,525–1,559 1,626.5–1,660 2,900–3,000
3.0–3.1 5.47–5.65 9.2–9.3
Millimeter Wave 70-80-90 GHz Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
71–76 81–86 92–94 94.1–95
—
—
Mobile Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–138 148–150.05
30–31 39.5–41 43.5–47 50.4–51.4 66–74 81–84 123–130 158.5–164 191.8–200 252–265
399.9–400.05 400.15–401 406–406.1 1,525–1,559 1,610–1,660.5 2,000–2,020 2,180–2,200 2,483.5–2,500
7.25–7.75 7.9–8.4 14–14.5 19.7–21.2 29.5–30
Multiple Address Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
928–960
—
Multiuse Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
151.82 151.88 151.94 154.57 154.60
—
—
—
Appendix A
241 Offshore Radiotelephone Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
40.5–43.5
476–478 479–481 482–484 485–487 488–490 491–493
—
Paging 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
35–36 43–44 152–159
—
454–460 929 931
—
On–Site Paging 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
47.0–47.25
—
440–470
—
PCS Broadband 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
1,850–1,990 1,930–1,990
—
PCS Narrowband 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
901–902 930–931 940–941
—
PCS Unlicensed 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
1,920–1,930
Petroleum Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
36.25 41.71 150.980 154.585 158.445 159.480
—
454 459
—
242
Appendix A Private and Public Land Mobile 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz
3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
30.56–32 33–34 35–36 37–38 39–46.6 47–49.6 72–73 74.6–74.8 75.2–76 150.8–156.2475 157.0375–173.4 216–222
3.0–3.7 4.94–4.99 5.25–5.65 5.85–5.925 10.0–10.55 13.4–14 15.7–17.3 24.05–24.25
33.4–36
406.1–455 456–462.5375 462.7375–467.5375 467.7375–512 698–901 902–930 931–940 941–960 1,427–1,432 2,210–2,180 2,450–2,483.5 2,900–3,000
Public Safety Services 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
764–776 794–806
—
Radio Astronomy 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
37.50–38.25 73–74.6
31.0–31.8 42.5–43.5 76–116 123–158.5 164–167 182–185 200–217 226.0–231.5 241–275
406.1–410 608–614 1,400–1,427 1,610.6–1,613.8 1,660–1,670 2,655–2,700
4.99–5.0 10.68–10.7 15.35–15.4 22.21–22.5 23.6–24
Radio Control Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
72–73 75.4–76
—
—
—
Appendix A
243 Space Operation/Space Research 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–143.65
31.3–32.3 34.2–34.7 35.5–38 40–40.5 50.2–50.4 52.6–59.3 65–66 74–84 86–92 94–94.1 100–102 105–122.25 148.5–151.5 155.5–158.5 164–167 174.8–191.8 200–209 217–231.5 235–238 250–252
400.15–402 410–420 1,215–1,300 1,400–1,429 1,660.5–1,668.4 1,755–1,850 2,025–2,120 2,200–2,300 2,655–2,700
3.1–3.3 4.99–5.0 5.25–5.57 7.145–7.235 8.4–8.5 8.55–8.65 9.5–9.8 10.6–10.7 13.25–14.2 14.5–15.4 16.6–17.1 17.2–17.3 18.6–18.8 21.2–21.4 22.21–22.5 23.6–24 25.5–27
Specified Mobile Radio Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
809–824 854–869 896–901 935–940
—
Standard Frequency and Time Signal Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
30–31.3
400.05–400.15
13.4–14.0 20.2–21.2 25.25–27
Television (Digital) 30 MHz – 300 MHz 300 MHz – 3 GHz 3 GHz – 30 GHz 30 GHz – 300 GHz 54–72 76–88 174–216
470–608 614–698 2,025–2,110
—
—
Ultrawideband (UWB) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
Below 960
1.99–10.6
244
Appendix A Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U–NII) Devices 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
—
5.15–5.35 5.47–5.825
Vehicle Radar Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
46.7–46.9 76–77
—
16.2–17.7 23.12–29
Weather Instruments/Radar/Satellites 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–138
33.4–34.5
400.15–406 460–470 1,668.4–1,710 2,700–3,000
5.6–5.65 7.75–7.85 8.175–8.215 9.3–9.5 9.975–10.025
Wireless Communication Service 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
2,305–2,320 2,345–2,360
—
Wind Medical Telemetry 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
608–614 1,395–1,400 1,427–1,432
—
Wireless Microphones 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
54–72 76–88 169.445 169.505 170.245 170.305 171.045 171.105 171.845 171.905 174–216
—
470–608 614–806
—
Appendix A
245
A.2 International Frequency Allocation Active Sensors (Satellite) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
30.0–37.5
—
402–406
—
Aeronautical Radio Navigation 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3,000 MHz 3 GHz–30 GHz 30 GHz–300 GHz 74.8–75.2 108–117.975
328.6–335.4 960–1,215 1,300–1,350 1,559–1,626.5 2,700–3,000
3.0–3.1 4.2–4.4 5.00–5.15 8.50–10.0 13.25–13.4 15.4–15.7
—
Amateur Applications 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
50–52 144–146
47.0–47.2 47.5–47.9 48.2–48.54 75.5–81.5 122.25–123.0 134–141 241–250
430–440 1,240–1,300 2,300–2,450
3.4–3.5 5.650–5,830 10.0–10.5 24.0–24.25
Amateur Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
144–146
47–47.2 75.5–81.5 122.25–123 134–141 241–250
434.79–438 1,260–1,270 2,400–2,450
5.650–5.725 5.830–5.850 10.45–10.5 24–24.05
Analog/Digital Land Mobile Radio 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
30.01–40.66 40.7–74.8 75.2–87.5 146–156 157.45–160.60 160.975–161.475 162.05–174.0
—
385–390 395–399.9 406.1–430 440–470 870–876 915–921
—
246
Appendix A Automotive Short Range Radar (SRR) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
76–81
—
—
Broadband Mobile Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
40–40.5 42.5–43.5 62–63 65–66
—
—
Defense Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
29.7–74.8 75.2–87.5 138–144 230–242.95 243.05–300
33.4–39.5 43.5–45.5 59.0–64.0 71–74 81–84
300–328.6 335.4–399.9 790–890 915–935 1,215–1,400 1,427–1,452 1,492–1,525 1,660–1,670 1,675–1,710 2,025–2,110 2,200–2,290 2,520–2,655 2,900–3,000
3.00–3.40 4.40–5.00 5.25–5.85 7.25–8.40 13.4–14 14.50–15.35 15.7–17.7 24.05–24.25 26.5–27.5
Digital Enhanced Cordless Telephony Systems (DECT) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
1,880–1,900
—
Distress Signals 30 MHz–300 MHz
300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
156.5125–156.5375 1,544–1,545 156.7625–156.8375
—
30 GHz–300 GHz —
Equipment for Detecting Movement and Alert 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
33.4–35.2
2,400–2,483.5
9.2–10 10.5–10.6 13.4–14 24.05–24.25
Appendix A
247 Feeder Links 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
47.2–49.44
—
5.15–5.25 6.925–7.075 17.3–18.4 27.5–29.5
Fixed Links 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
31–31.3 31.5–31.8 37–39.5 48.2–50.2 55.78–59 64–66 71–76 81–86
2,025–2,110 2,200–2,290 2,483.5–2,500 2,520–2,670
5.925–8.5 10.15–10.30 10.45–10.68 10.7–11.7 12.75–13.25 14.5–15.35 17.7–19.7 22–22.6 23–23.6 24.5–26.5 27.5–29.5
Fixed Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
30–31 37.5–40.5 42.5–45.5 47.2–50.2 50.4–51.4 71–76 81–86 123–130 158.5–164 167–174.5 209–226 232–240 265–275
—
3.4–4.2 4.5–4.8 5.15–5.25 5.725–7.075 7.25–7.75 7.9–8.4 10.7–11.7 12.5–13.25 13.75–14.5 15.43–15.63 17.3–21.2 27.5–30
FM Radio Broadcasting 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
87.5–108
—
—
—
248
Appendix A IMT (International Mobile Telecommunications) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
880–915 925–960 1,710–1,785 1,805–1,880 1,900–2,025 2,110–2,170 2,500–2,690
3.4–3.6
Industrial, Scientific, and Medical Applications (ISM) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
40.66–40.70
59.3–62.0
433.05–434.79 2,400–2,500
5.725–5.925 24.0–24.25
Low Earth Orbiting Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–138 148–150.05
—
400.15–401
—
Maritime 30 MHz–300 MHz
300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
156–156.5125 456–459 156.5375–156.7625 156.8375–157.45 160.6–160.975 161.475–162.05
—
30 GHz–300 GHz —
Meteorology (Including Satellites) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–138
35.2–36
400.15–406 460–470 1,668.4–1,710
7.45–7.55 7.75–7.85 8.175–8.215 18.1–18.3
Mobile Applications 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
137–144
—
1,785–1,800 2,290–2,400 2,483.5–2,500
3.40–3.60 4.40–5.0 8.025–8.215
Appendix A
249 Mobile Satellite 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
121.45–121.55 137–138 148–150.05 242.95–243.05
30–31 39.5–40.5 43.5–47 50.4–51.4 66–74 123–130 158.5–164 191.8–200 252–265
399.9–400.05 400.15–401 406–406.1 1,518–1,559 1,610–1,660.5 1,668–1,675 1,980–2,010 2,170–2,200 2,483.5–2,500
7.25–7.375 7.9–8.025 10.7–11.7 14–14.50 19.7–21.2 29.5–30
Multimedia Wireless Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
40.5–43.5
—
—
Nonspecific Short Range Device (SRD) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
40.66–40.70 138.20–138.45
59.3–62.0
433.05–434.79 2400–2500
5.725–5.925 24.0–24.25
On-Site Paging 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
47.0–47.25
—
440–470
—
Passive Sensors (Satellite) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
31.3–31.8 36–37 50.2–50.4 52.6–59.3 86–92 100–102 116–122.25 148.5–158.5 164–167 174.8–191.8 226–231.5 235–238 250–252
1,400–1,427 2,690–2,700
4.2–4.4 4.8–4.99 6.425–7.25 10.6–10.7 13.75–14 15.35–15.4 18.6–18.8 21.2–21.4 22.21–22.5 23.6–24
250
Appendix A Position Fixing 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
35.2–36
432–438 1,215–1,300
3.1–3.3 5.25–5.57 8.55–8.65 9.5–9.8 13.25–13.75 24.05–24.25
Public Cellular Networks, GSM 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
455–470 880–915 925–960 1,710–1,785 1,805–1,880
—
Radar and Navigation Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
960–1350 2,700–3,000
3.0–3.1 5.0–5.03
Radio Astronomy 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
37.50–38.25 70.45–74.8 80.25–84.6 150.05–153.0
31.0–31.8 36–37 42.5–43.5 48.54–49.44 51.4–52.6 58.2–59 76–116 123–158.5 164–167 182–185 200–217 226.0–231.5 235–238 241–275
406.1–410 608–614 1,300–1,400 1,400–1,427 1,610.6–1,613.8 1,60–1,670 2,200–2,290 2,655–2,690 2,690–2,700
4.80–5.03 8.215–8.40 10.6–10.7 14.47–15.4 22–23.55 23.6–24
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
865–868 2,446–2,454
—
Appendix A
251 Radio Microphones 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
29.7–47.0 174–216
—
470–862 863–865 1,785–1,800
—
Railway Applications 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
876–880 921–925 2,446–2,454
—
Satellite Digital Audio Broadcasting (S–DAB) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
1,479.5–1,492
—
Satellite TV 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
11.7–12.5
—
—
—
21.4–22
—
Services Ancillary to Programming/Broadcasting (SAP/SAB) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
47.2–50.2
470–862 2,025–2,110 2,200–2,290 2,483.5–2,500 2,520–2,670
3.4–3.6 10–10.68 22–23.6 24–24.5
Shipborne and VTS Radar 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
—
5.25–5.725
252
Appendix A Space Operation/Space Research 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
48.5–50 137–143.65
31.3–32.3 34.2–35.2 35.5–38 40–40.5 50.2–50.4 52.6–55.78 56.9–59.3 65–66 74–79 81–84 86–92 94–94.1 100–102 105–116 122.02–122.25 164–167 174.8–191.8 200–209 217–231.5 250–252
400–402 410–420 460–470 1,215–1,300 1,400–1,429 1,525–1,535 1,660.5–1,668.4 2,025–2,120 2,290–2,300 2,655–2,670 2,690–2,700
3.1–3.3 5.0–5.03 5.25–5.57 7.145–7.25 8.4–8.5 8.55–8.65 8.75–10 10.6–10.7 12.75–14.3 15.35–15.4 16.6–17.1 17.2–17.3 22–23 23.6–24 25.5–27
Terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting (TDAB) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
174–240
—
1,452–1,479.5
—
TV Broadcasting 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
174–230
—
470–862
—
Ultrawideband (UWB) 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
—
6–8.50
Very Small Aperture Terminal/Satellite News Gathering 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
12.5–12.75
—
—
—
14–14.50
—
Weather Radar 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
—
5.25–5.85
—
—
—
9.3–9.5
—
Appendix A
253 Wideband Data Transmission Systems 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
—
2,400–2,483.5
5.15–5.3
—
—
—
5.47–5.725
—
—
—
17.10–17.30
—
Wind Profiler Radar 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
46–68
440–450
—
—
—
470–608
—
—
—
1,270–1,300
—
—
Wireless Applications in Healthcare 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
30.0–37.5
—
402–406
—
Wireless Audio Applications 30 MHz–300 MHz 300 MHz–3 GHz 3 GHz–30 GHz
30 GHz–300 GHz
87.5–108
863–865
—
—
—
1,795–1,800
—
—
Appendix B List of EMC Standards Regarding Emission and Susceptibility B.1 Cenelec EN 50081-1:1992—Electromagnetic compatibility—Generic standard—Part 1: Residential, commercial, and light industry.
emission
EN 50081-2:1994—Electromagnetic compatibility—Generic standard—Part 2: Industrial environment.
emission
EN 50082-1:1998—Electromagnetic compatibility—Generic standard—Part 1: Residential, commercial, and light industry.
immunity
EN 50082-2:1995—Electromagnetic compatibility—Generic standard—Part 2: Industrial environment.
immunity
EN 55014-1:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility—Requirements for household appliances, electric tools, and similar apparatus—Part 1: Emission—Product family standard. EN 55014-2:1997—Electromagnetic compatibility—Requirements for household appliances, electric tools, and similar apparatus—Part 2: Immunity—Product family standard. EN 55015:2001—Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of electrical lightning and similar equipment. EN 55020:2002—Electromagnetic immunity of broadcast receivers and associated equipment. EN 55024:1998—Information technology equipment—Immunity characteristics—Limits and methods of measurement; Amendment A1:2001 to EN 55024:1998. EN 55103-1:1997—Electromagnetic compatibility—Product family standard for audio, video, audiovisual, and entertainment lighting control apparatus for professional use—Part 1: Emission. EN 55103-2:1997—Electromagnetic compatibility—Product family standard for audio, video, audiovisual, and entertainment lighting control apparatus for professional use—Part 2: Immunity. EN 55104:1995—Electromagnetic compatibility—Immunity requirements for household appliances, tools, and similar apparatus—Product family standard.
255
256
Appendix B
EN 61000-3-2:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 3-2: Limits—Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current up to and including 16A per phase). EN 61000-6-1:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 6-1: Generic standards—Immunity for residential, commercial, and light-industrial environments. EN 61000-6-2:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part Generic standards—Immunity for industrial environments.
6-2:
EN 61000-6-3:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 6-3: Generic standards—Emission standard for residential, commercial, and light-industrial environments. EN 61000-6-4:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part Generic standards—Emission standard for industrial environments.
6-4:
EN 61547:1996—Equipment for general lighting purposes—EMC immunity requirements. EN 12015:1998—Electromagnetic compatibility—Product family standard for lifts, escalators, and passenger conveyors—Emission. EN 12016:1998—Electromagnetic compatibility—Product family standard for lifts, escalators, and passenger conveyors—Immunity.
B.2 Australian Standards AS/NZS 4251.1:1999—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Generic emission standard—Residential, commercial, and light industry. AS/NZS 4251.2: 1999—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Generic emission standard—Industrial environments.
B.3 Canadian Standards CAN/CSA C108.8-M83 (R2000)—Limits and methods of measurement of electromagnetic emissions from data processing equipment and electronic office machines. CAN/CSA-C108.9-M91 (R1999)—Sound and television broadcasting receivers and associated equipment—Limits and methods of measurement of immunity characteristics. CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-3-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-3: Testing and measurement techniques—Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-3:1995 + A1:1998, Edition 1.1, 1998-11). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-4-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques—Section 4: Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test—Basic EMC publication (Adopted CEI/IEC 1000-4-4:1995, first edition, 1995-01, including Amendment 1:2000).
Appendix B
257
CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-5-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques—Section 5: Surge immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 1000-4-5:1995, first edition, 1995-02, including Corrigendum October 1995 and Amendment 1:2000). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-6-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques—Section 6: Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (Adopted CEI/IEC 1000-4-6:1996, first edition, 1996-03, including Corrigendum September 1996 and Amendment 1:2000). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-8-02—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-8: Testing and measurement techniques—Power frequency magnetic field immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-8:1993 + A1:2000, edition 1.1, 2001-03). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-9-02—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-9: Testing and measurement techniques—Pulse magnetic field immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-9:1993 + A1:2000, edition 1.1, 2001-03). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-11-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4: Testing and measuring techniques—Section 11: Voltage dips, short interruptions, and voltage variations immunity tests (Adopted CEI/IEC 1000-4-11:1994, first edition, 1994-06 including Amendment 1:2000). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-12-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques—Section 12: Oscillatory waves immunity test basic EMC publication (Adopted CEI/IEC 1000-4-12:1995, first edition, 1995-05, including Amendment 1:2000). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-16-02—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-16: Testing and measurement techniques—Test for immunity to conducted, common mode disturbances in the frequency range 0 Hz to 150 kHz (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-16:1998, first edition, 1998-01, including Amendment 1:2001). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-17-02—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-17: Testing and measurement techniques—Ripple on DC input power port immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-17:1999, first edition, 1999-06, including Amendment 1:2001). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-27-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-27: Testing and measurement techniques—Unbalance, immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-27:2000, first edition, 2000-08). CAN/CSA-CEI/IEC 61000-4-28-01—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-28: Testing and measurement techniques—Variation of power frequency, immunity test (Adopted CEI/IEC 61000-4-28:1999, first edition, 1999-11).
258
Appendix B
B.4 European Standards CISPR 14-1, Amendment 2, Edition 4.0—EMC—Requirements for household appliances, electric tools, and similar apparatus—Part 1: Emission. CISPR 16-1, Consolidated, Edition 2.1—Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—Part 1: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus. CISPR 16-2, Consolidated, Edition 1.2—Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—Part 2: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity; Amendment 1:1999 to CISPR 16-2:1999. CISPR 16-3, Consolidated, Edition 1.1—Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—Part 3: Reports and recommendations of CISPR. CISPR 16-4, Edition 1.0—Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC measurements. CISPR 19:1983—Guidance on the use of substitution method for measurements of radiation from microwave ovens for frequencies above 1 GHz. CISPR 20:1999—Sound and television broadcast receivers and associated equipment immunity characteristics—Limits and methods of measurement. CISPR 24:1997—Information technology characteristics—Limits and methods of measurement.
equipment—Immunity
CISPR 61000-6-3:1996—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 6: Generic standards—Section 3: Emission standard for residential, commercial and light-industrial environments. CISPR/TR 16-3:2000—Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—Part 3: Reports and recommendations of CISPR. CISPR/TR 28:1997—Industrial, scientific and medical equipment (ISM)—Guidelines for emission levels within the bands designated by ITU. EN 300 127:1999—Electromagnetic compatibility and radio spectrum matters (ERM); Radiated emission testing of physically large telecommunication systems. EN 61000-2-9:1996—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 2: Environment—Section 9: Description of HEMP environment—Radiated disturbance. EN 61000-4-3:2002—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-3: Testing and measurement techniques—Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test; Amendment A1:1998 to EN 61000-4-3:1996. EN 61000-4-6:1996—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-6: Testing and measurement techniques—Immunity to conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fields. EN 61000-4-8:1994—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-8: Testing and measurement techniques—Power frequency magnetic field immunity test.
Appendix B
259
EN 61000-4-9:1994—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-9: Testing and measurement techniques—Pulse magnetic field immunity test. EN 61000-4-23:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-23: Testing and measurement techniques—Test methods for protective devices for HEMP and other radiated disturbances. EN 61000-4-28:2000—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4-28: Testing and measurement techniques—Variation of power frequency, immunity test. ETS 300 127:1994—Equipment engineering (EE); Radiated emission testing of physically large telecommunication systems. IEC 61000-3-2:2001—Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 3: Limits. Section 2: Limits for harmonic current emissions for electronic equipment (equipment input current less than 16A per phase).
B.5 Other Standards IEEE 139:1988 (R1999)—IEEE recommended practice for the measurement of radio-frequency emission from industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) equipment installed on user’s premises. IEEE 213:1987 (R1998)—IEEE standard procedure for measuring conducted emissions in the range of 300 kHz to 25 MHz from television and FM broadcast receivers to power lines. IEEE C63.4:2000—Methods of measurement of radio-noise emissions from low-voltage electrical and electronic equipment in the range of 9 kHz to 40 GHz. IEEE C63.5:1998—Electromagnetic compatibility—Radiated emission measurements in electromagnetic interference (EMI) control—Calibration of antennas. IEEE C63.7:1992—Construction of open-area test sites for performing radiated emission measurements. IEEE C63.18:1997—Recommended practice for an on-site ad hoc test method for estimating radiated electromagnetic immunity of medical devices to specific radio-frequency transmitters.
Acronyms and Abbreviations AWGN AF AGA ALSE AM ANSI ASK BCI BPF BSS CE CENELEC CEPT CI CISPR CS CSA CW DCS 1800 DECT DUT DVB-T ECA ECC EEE or E3 EESS EGSM EMC EMD EMI EMP
additive white Gaussian noise antenna factor air ground air absorber-lined shielded environment analog modulation American National Standards Institute amplitude shift keying bulk current injection band-pass filter broadcasting satellite service conducted emissions European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations conducted immunity International Special Committee on Radio Interference conducted susceptibility Canadian Standards Association continuous wave Digital Communication System Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunication System device under test terrestrial digital video broadcasting European Common Allocation Electronic Communications Committee electromagnetic environmental effects Earth Exploration-Satellite Service Extended GSM electromagnetic compatibility electromagnetic disturbance electromagnetic interference electromagnetic pulse
261
262
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ERC ERO ERP ESD EUT FCC FDD FIR FM FSK FSS FWA GNSS GSM GTEM HDTV HEMP HIPERLAN HPF IEC IEEE IEMI IIR ILS ISM ISO ITU LISN LPF NATO NEMP NGSO OATS PAMR PCM PLT PM PMR PSK PWM QAM
European Radiocommunications Committee European Radiocommunications Office effective radiated power electrostatic discharge equipment under test Federal Communications Commission frequency division duplex finite response filter frequency modulation frequency shift keying fixed satellite service fixed wireless access Global Navigation Satellite System Global System for Mobile Communications Gigahertz Transverse Electromagnetic High Definition Television High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse High Performance Radio Local Area Network highpass filter International Electrotechnical Commission Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers intentional electromagnetic interference infinite response filter Instrument Landing System industrial, scientific, and medical equipment International Organization for Standardization International Telecommunication Union Line Impedance Stabilization Network lowpass filter North Atlantic Treaty Organization nuclear electromagnetic pulse nongeostationary satellite orbit Open Area Test Site Public Access Mobile Radio pulse code modulation power line transient phase modulation Professional Mobile Radio, Private Mobile Radio phase shift keying pulse width modulation quadrature amplitude modulation
Acronyms and Abbreviations
RA RE RES RF RFI RFID RLAN RR RS SC T-DAB TEM TETRA UMTS/IMT-2000 UTP VSAT VSWR XTALK
263
radio astronomy radiated emissions radiated electromagnetic susceptibility radio frequency radio frequency interference radio frequency identification systems radio local area network radio regulations radiated susceptibility conducted susceptibility Terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting transverse electromagnetic Terrestrial Trunked Radio International Mobile Telecommunications unshielded twisted pair very small aperture terminal voltage standing wave ratio Crosstalk
Glossary Accuracy of measurement The closeness of the agreement between the result of a measurement and the value of the measurand. Corrected result The result of a measurement after correction for assumed systematic error. Correction A value added algebraically to the uncorrected result of a measurement to compensate for systematic error (equal to the negative of estimated systematic error). Combined standard uncertainty The standard uncertainty of a measurement result when that result is obtained from the values of a number of other quantities, equal to the positive square root of a sum of terms; the terms being the variances or covariances of these other weighted quantities. Coverage factor A numerical factor used as a multiplier of the combined standard uncertainty for obtaining an expanded uncertainty (e.g., a coverage factor, k, is typically in the range of 2 to 3, but may range lower for special purposes; when k = 2, the probability level approximates 95%). Error of measurement The result of a measurement minus the value of the measurand. Expanded uncertainty The quantity defining the interval about the result of a measurement within which the values that reasonably could be attributed to the measurand may be expected to be at a high level of confidence. Precision The quality of being exactly or sharply defined or stated; the measure of accuracy of a representation is the number of distinguishable alternatives from which it was selected, which is sometimes indicated by the number of significant digits it contains. Random error The result of a measurement minus the mean that would result from an infinite number of measurements of the same measurand carried out under repeatability conditions. Relative error of measurement The error of measurement divided by a true value of the measurand. Repeatability of measurement results The closeness of agreement between the results of successive measurements of the same measurand carried out under the same measurement conditions. Resolution The least value of the measured quantity that can be distinguished.
265
266
Glossary
Reproducibility of measurement results The closeness of agreement between the results of measurements of the same measurand carried out under changed measurement conditions. Standard uncertainty The uncertainty of the result of a measurement expressed as standard deviation. Systematic error The mean that would result from an infinite number of measurements of the same measurand carried out under repeatability conditions minus the value of the measurand. Type A evaluation of standard uncertainty An evaluation method of standard uncertainty by statistical analysis of a series of observations. Type B evaluation of standard uncertainty An evaluation method of standard uncertainty by means other than statistical analysis of a series of observations. Uncertainty of measurement A parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, which characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand. Uncorrected result The result of a measurement before correction for the assumed systematic error.
About the Author Kresimir Malaric received a B.Sc., an M.Sc., and a Ph.D. from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb in 1991, 1994, and 2000, respectively. From 1992 to 1995 he worked at the Department of Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering and Measurements. Since 1996 he has been with the Department of Wireless Communications and with the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing at the University of Zagreb, where he is an associate professor. His current teaching and research areas include electromagnetic compatibility, satellite communications, and biomedical effects. He has published more than 100 conference and journal scientific papers. Dr. Malaric is a member of the IEEE and the Croatian Academy of Technical Sciences.
267
Index A Absorbers, 185–89, 193, 201 Absorption, 51, 53, 137, 141, 200–1 Absorption loss, 132, 141–42, 144–45 Active filters, 79, 85, 91 ADC, 79, 91–93, 118 Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), 57 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 5 Amplitude modulation, 10, 69, 105–6, 120 quadrature, 10, 105, 112 Amplitude shift keying (ASK), 113–14 Analog communication system, 1–2 Analog filters, 79, 85–91 Analog systems, 1, 17, 57 Anechoic chambers, 185–88 Antenna, 19–22, 192–93 Antenna impedance, 21 Antenna systems, 19, 21 Antistatic wrist tape, 63 Aperture dimensions, 138 Attenuation, 36, 46 atmosphere, 65–69 filter, 80–86 Attenuation constant, 36–37
B Bandpass filter, 81–83 Bandstop filters, 83 Bessel filters, 87 Bit errors, 13, 15 Bolting, 163–64 Bonding, 134, 153–54, 158–60, 162, 164–66 Bonding classes, 160 Bonding resistance, 160, 162–63 BPSK, 117 Brazing, 62–63 Butterworth filters, 85–86
C Cable screens, 133–34 Cable shielding, 128, 132–33, 135 Cables, tri-axial, 133 Capacitance, stray, 128, 132, 158, 162 Capacitive coupling, 128–29, 154, 221–22
Capacitive coupling clamp, 219–20, 226 Capacitive reactance, 161 Cavities, 19–20 Characteristic impedance, 41, 98, 158,| 196–201 Chebyshev, 86–87, 94, 98–99 Clamp, 218–22 Commercial radar systems, 74 Conducted emission (CE), 170–72, 178–79 Conductive adhesive, 164 Control of system drift, 120–21 Convolutional encoder, 7–8 Coupling, 61, 99, 123–32, 134, 136–40, 142, 168–69, 215–22 cable-to-cable, 125 common mode, 130 differential mode, 130 inductive, 131, 219, 221–22 Coupling capacitors, 215–16 Coupling clamp, 219, 222 Coupling Transformer, 217 CS (Conducted susceptibility), 170–72, 178–81 Cutoff frequency, 79–81, 83, 85–87, 91, 97, 140, 194–95, 197–98, 209–11
D Decoder, 2, 9, 11, 13–15 Decryption, 15 Decryptor, 15 Deinterleaver, 11–12 Demodulation, 12, 17, 103–5, 107–13, 115, 117–19 Demodulator, 1–2, 11–12, 105, 108, 115, 121 Demultiplexer, 11, 16–17 Derandomizer, 11, 15 Detection, 5, 58, 103–5, 108 envelope, 12, 107–8, 112, 115, 118 Dielectric resonators, 100–1 Digital filters, 91–97, 101 Digital modulation, 10, 105, 112 Directivity, 20–22 Dissimilar metal, 164 Duplexer, 2, 19
269
270
E Effective radiated power (ERP), 72–73, 262 Electric field, 40, 47, 100, 128, 130–32, 145–48, 172, 179, 181–82, 197–98, 205 Electric field coupling to wires, 128–29 Electrical grounding and bonding, 153–54, 156, 158, 160, 162, 164, 166 Electromagnetic interference, 57–77, 126, 134, 151, 155, 167, 170, 215 Electromagnetic spectrum, 27–29, 167 Electrostatic discharge (ESD), 57, 59, 62–64, 154, 156, 169–70, 219, 223–24, 262 EM clamp, 221 EMI receivers, 170, 224 Emission, conducted, 170–72, 178, 224–25, 261 Emission tests, 182, 221–22 Encoder, 2, 5, 7, 12–13 convolutional, 6–8 differential, 6–7 Encoding, convolutional, 7–9 Encryption, 2, 5, 15 Equipment shielding, 147, 149, 151 Equipotential plane, 156, 158–59 Evaluation of standard uncertainty, 227–28 Extra low frequency (ELF), 27–29
F Faraday cage, 133, 145–46, 148, 185 Fault protection, 155–59 Ferrite beads, 149 Ferrite tiles, 185, 187, 189–91 Field-to-aperture coupling, 137, 139 Filter order, 86 Filter types, 88, 97–98 Filtering, 11–12, 103, 108, 126, 128, 136 Filter order, 86–93 Filters, 11–12, 79–81, 83–91, 93–94, 98–99, 102–4, 148–49, 155, 169–70 active, 79, 91–92 elliptic, 88 ferrite, 126–7 nonrecursive, 92, 95–96 passive, 79, 85, 88, 91, 224 recursive, 92, 95–6 Finite impulse response (FIR), 92, 94–95, 262 FIR filters, 93 Flicker noise, 58 Floating ground, 156–57
Index
Frequency modulation (FM), 10, 29, 69, 71, 105, 109–12 signal, 109–10 Frequency shift keying (FSK), 10, 105, 112, 114–15 modulation, 114–15, 117 signal, 115–16, 118 Fresnel knife-edge diffraction, 48 Full anechoic and semianechoic chambers, 185, 187, 189
G Gasketing, 147 Golay decoder 15 Graphical user interface (GUI), 18 Ground conductors, 155, 157 fault, 153, 155–56 plane, 148–49, 160, 192 protection, 154–55 reference plane, 159, 221–22 wire, 155 Grounding, 128, 132–33, 153–56, 158, 166 GTEM cell, 201, 203, 205, 207, 209, 211, 213
H High frequencies, 28–30, 123, 130, 133, 147, 160–62, 225 Higher-order modes, 197–99, 207 Highpass filters, 11, 80–81, 86
I IIR filters, 94–96 Immunity, 76, 137, 177, 218 Impedance antenna, 21 ferrite, 126 Industrial sources, 175 Interference, 57, 69, 167 intentional, 76 radiated, 167 Interleaving, 9 Intermodulation products, 10, 12 Injection clamps and probes, 221 Ionosphere, 53–54, 69 Isotropic radiator, 21
K Key encryption, 5 private, 5
Index
public, 5 Kuroda transformation, 98
L Lightning, 59–62, 153–62 protection, 154, 160 strike, 156 Line impedance stabilization network (LISN), 215–16 Line of sight, 50 Load impedance, 39, 128 Look-up tables (LUTs), 9 Lowpass filter, 80, 99 RC filter, 89 RL filter, 89 Lumped element filters, 97
M Magnetic field, 123, 146 Maxwell equations, 44–45 Measurement facilities, 185 Measurement uncertainty, 227 Microwave filters, 97–101 Military requirements, 178 Minimum shift keying (MSK), 114 Mixer, 10, 12 Modulated signal, 10, 105 Modulating signal, 105 Modulation index, 107 Modulator, 10, 105 Moisture, 63, 148, 154, 165, 193 Multipath, 64–65 Multiplexer, 2–4 Multipoint ground, 158
N Noise burst, 59 flicker noise, 58 shot, 58 source, 131–33 spectral density, 59 thermal, 58 voltages, 156 white, 103 Noise factor (NF), 16–19
O Open area test site (OATS), 191 Oscilloscope, 225
271
P Passive filters, 88, 224 Parallel plate, 217 Path, 51 direct, 64–65 loss, 51–53 reflected, 64–65 Permeability, 35, 123, 150, 189 Permittivity, 35, 100, 189 Phase constant, 36 Phase difference, 47, 65, 119 Phase shift keying (PSK), 116 Polarization, 42–43, 47–49, 67 circular, 47–48 elliptical, 48 linear, 47 Potential difference, 27, 60, 164 Power amplifiers, 23 cables, 167 density, 16, 38, 46, 51 supply, 23 Private networks, 74 Probability distributions, 228 functions, 104 Probes, 195, 218 current 220 Propagation, 44, 54, 57 Protection fault, 155 PCB, 148 Pulse code modulation (PCM), 118 Pyramidal absorbers, 187–89
Q QPSK, 117–18, 120 Quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), 119
R Radar, 74–75 Radiated EMI, 169–72 emissions, 181 power, effective, 72 susceptibility, 182 Radiation pattern, 20 Rain, 47, 54, 65–68 rate, 66–68
272
Randomization, 4 Reactance, 41, 97, 159 Received power, 16 Receiver, 11, 24 sensitivity, 17 systems, 11 Rectangular distribution, 229 Reed-Solomon coding, 8 decoding, 14 Reflected wave, 37–38, 40 Reflection, 42, 141 coefficient, 37–38, 187, 193 loss, 143–44 total, 42 Refraction, 42 Resistance, 123 Resistivity, 123–24 Resonances, 84–88, 147, 162, 197 parallel, 85 serial, 84 Resonators, 98, 100–1 Reverberation chambers, 193 RF mismatch error, 232 susceptibility, 186 Richard transformation, 97 Ripple, 85–88 Room, shielded, 172
S S/UTP, 134 Safety, 154–55 Salisbury paper, 187 Scattering, 53–54, 188 Selectivity, 11–12, 83, 224 Semianechoic chambers, 185 Sensitivity, 17, 225, 230–31 Shield, 132, 146, 149 apertures, 137 magnetic, 149 Shielded twisted pair (STP), 134 Shielding effectiveness (SE), 138 Shock, 154, 215 hazard, 154–55, 160 Shot noise, 58 Single point ground, 157–58 Skin depth, 37, 123, 132, 141, 218 Skin effect, 123, 194 Smith chart, 39–41 Snell’s law, 42, 64 Sources
Index
industrial, 75 manmade, 69 natural, 59 Space wave, 20 Spectrum analyzer, 225 Spring fingers, 148 Standard deviation, 227–28 Standard uncertainty, 227–31 Static electricity, 62–63, 153 Stopbands, 88 Strap, 160–62, 165 Striplines, 149 Subkey, 6 Sunspot activity, 68–69 Surface wave, 54, 64 Susceptibility, 75, 167, 171 conducted, 172, 179 radiated, 170, 172 SWR, 40 Systematic errors, 227
T Thermal noise, 17, 57 Total reflection, 42 Total transmission, 42–43 Transfer function (filter), 79 Transformers λ/4, 41 coupling, 217 Transients, 59, 170–71 Transmission line, 38, 41, 44, 97, 149–50, 157, 162, 195, 201, 232 Transmitter, 3 Transverse electromagnetic mode (TEM) cell, 195 mode, 197 Tri-axial cable, 133 Troposphere, 53–54 Twisted pair screened shielded, 134–35 screened unshielded, 134–35 shielded, 134 unshielded, 125
U Uninterruptible power supply (UPS), 23 Unshielded twisted pair (UTP), 125 User interface, 18 graphic, 18 voice, 19 U-shaped distribution, 230
Index
273
V
W
Victim, 167–69 Viterbi decoder, 14 Voice user interface, 19 Voltage reference control, 156 Voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), 200, 204–5, 211
Wave generation and propagation, 44 impedance, 35–37, 195 planar, 195, 201 transmitted, 42, 190 Waveguide cavity filter, 98–99 Welding, 162–63 Wire coupling, 123, 130
Recent Related Artech House Titles
Advanced Phase-Lock Techniques, James A. Crawford Analytical and Computational Methods in Electromagnetics, Ramesh Garg Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromagnetics, Sergei Tretyakov Applications of Neural Networks in Electromagnetics, Christos Christodoulou and Michael Georgiopoulos Component Reliability for Electronic Systems, Titu-Marius I. Bajenescu and Marius I. Bazu Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Methods, Third Edition, Allen Taflove and Susan C. Hagness Microwave Radio Transmission Design Guide, Second Edition, Trevor Manning Microwave System Design Tools and EW Applications, Second Edition, Peter W. East Noise in Linear and Nonlinear Circuits, Stephen Maas Quick Finite Elements for Electromagnetic Waves, Second Edition, Giuseppe Pelosi, Roberto Coccioli, and Stefano Selleri RF Bulk Acoustic Wave Filters for Communications, Ken-ya Hashimoto Signal Processing in Digital Communications, George J. Miao Wavelet Applications in Engineering Electromagnetics, Tapan K. Sarkar, Magdalena Salazar-Palmer, and Michael C. Wicks
For further information on these and other Artech House titles, including previously considered out-of-print books now available through our In-Print-Forever® (IPF®) program, contact: Artech House
Artech House
685 Canton Street
16 Sussex Street
Norwood, MA 02062
London SW1V HRW UK
Phone: 781-769-9750
Phone: +44 (0)20 7596-8750
Fax: 781-769-6334
Fax: +44 (0)20 7630-0166
e-mail:
[email protected] e-mail:
[email protected] Find us on the World Wide Web at: www.artechhouse.com