Vistas of Special Functions

VISTAS OF SPECIAL FUNCTIONS This page intentionally left blank VISTAS OF SPECIAL FUNCTIONS Shigeru Kanemitsu & Har...

Author: Shigeru Kanemitsu

38 downloads 919 Views 2MB Size Report

This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form

DOWNLOAD PDF

VISTAS OF SPECIAL FUNCTIONS

This page intentionally left blank

VISTAS OF SPECIAL FUNCTIONS

Shigeru Kanemitsu & Haruo Tsukada Kinki University, Japan

World Scientific N E W J E R S E Y • L O N D O N • S I N G A P O R E • B E I J I N G • S H A N G H A I • H O N G K O N G • TA I P E I • C H E N N A I

Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

VISTAS OF SPECIAL FUNCTIONS Copyright © 2007 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher.

For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher.

ISBN-13 978-981-270-774-1 ISBN-10 981-270-774-3

Printed in Singapore.

ZhangJi - Vistas of Special.pmd

1

4/11/2007, 5:37 PM

March 27, 2007

17:14

WSPC/Book Trim Size for 9in x 6in

To Professor Michel Waldschmidt with deep respect

v

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Preface

This book is intended for aspirant readers who are eager to have basic knowledge of special functions in an organic way. We have kept paying attention to make an order in various equivalent statements on special functions. A unique feature is that the reader can gain a grasp of (almost) all existing (and scattered around) formulas in the theory of gamma functions etc. in a clear perspective through the theory of zeta-functions. Thus, this is a book of special functions in terms of the zeta-functions. Reading through this book, the reader can master both fields efficiently. Here a hunter looking for two rabbits gets two. Here are some descriptions of the contents. In Chapter 1, we present a unified theory of Bernoulli polynomials with all equivalent conditions properly located. We have revealed that the difference equation (DE) satisfied by the Bernoulli polynomial corresponds to differentiation while the Kubert identity (K) corresponds to integration (the Riemann sum into equal division). This new view point makes the whole theory very lucid. In Chapter 2 we shall present rather classical and standard theory of the gamma and related functions. Classical as it looks, we shall provide some very unique features of the Euler digamma function from which we may deduce the corresponding properties of the gamma function. Especially, we shall give three proofs of the remarkable formula of Gauss on the values of the digamma function at rational arguments. One is classical and is presented in Chapter 2. Other two proofs are more original given in Chapter 8, one is the limiting case (Theorem 8.2) of the Eisenstein formula in its genuine form (a theorem due to H.-L. Li, L.-P. Ding and M. Hashimoto, describing a basis element in terms of another basis of the space of periodic Dirichlet series), the other is the theorem of M. Hashimoto, S. Kanemitsu vii

vista

March 27, 2007

viii

17:14


Vistas of Special Functions

and M. Toda about the equivalence between the finite form of the value of the Dirichlet L-function at 1 and the formula of Gauss. In Chapter 3, we shall present the theory of the Hurwitz zeta-function. The main ingredient is the integral representation for its partial sum. This is to the effect that once we have an integral representation as the one we have, we may immediately draw information for the derivatives, i.e. we have an inheritance of the information. The integral representation for the partial sum is so informative that it contains all information we need (Theorem 3.1). The versatility of this result will be developed in Chapter 5, where through Lerch’s formula, we transfer the results on the Hurwitz zetafunction to those on the gamma and related functions. Especially, the asymptotic results established in Chapter 3 will immediately transfer to the Stirling formula and other asymptotic formulas for relatives of the gamma function. In Chapter 4, we shall present the theory of Bernoulli polynomials through the negative integer values ζ(−n, z) of the Hurwitz zeta-function. Here we shall establish only three statements, i.e. the Fourier series (H), the difference equation (DE) and the Kubert identity (K) from any of which we may complete the theory following the logical scheme in Chapter 1. In Chapter 5, first we shall reveal the power of theorems in Chapter 3 to exhibit what the Dufresnoy-Pisot type uniqueness theorem means. Then we shall go on to presenting the first circle (krug p’iervyi) which connects various identities between gamma and trigonometric functions to the functional equations (zeta-symmetry) of the zeta-functions . Thus we shall show that everything comes from the functional equation. A remarkable notice is that such trigonometric identities like the infinite product for the sine function or the partial fraction expansion for the cotangent function are equivalent to the functional equation, thus revealing why Euler succeeded in solving the Basler problem. In Chapter 6, we shall further pursue this zeta-symmetry in relation to the crystal symmetry through the Epstein zeta-function. We surpass the preceding results by introducing the signs and giving the Chowla-Selberg type formula (based on the Mellin-Barnes integrals) and provide a quick means for computation of the Madelung constants. In Chapter 7, we shall provide rudiments of the theory of Fourier series and integrals to such an extent that is sufficient for applications and reading through this book, for the sake of the reader who wants to learn it quickly. Chapter 8 is, so to say, a discrete version of Chapter 7, i.e. the finite Fourier series (transforms). Through this we make clear the orthogonality

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Preface

vista

ix

of characters and other bases of the space of Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients, giving rise to the theorem mentioned above. We can naturally extend our method to develop the similar theory for higher derivatives of the Dirichlet L-function, including Kronecker’s limit formula. But because of limitation of time, we cannot go further. Appendix A gives the very basics of the theory of complex functions. We present mostly results only, and the interested reader should consult a standard book for their proofs. We shall give, however, some details on the use of residue theorem. Appendix B assembles summation formulas and convergence theorems used in the book. Especially, the Fourier series for the first periodic Bernoulli polynomial is so essential and important, we give two proofs, one depending on ordinary Fourier theory (Chapter 7) and the other on the polylogarithm function of degree 1, where we apply the theorem of Abel and Dirichlet in place of Fourier theory. As is explained above, Chapters 1 and 4 are parallel, so are Chapters 2 and 5. To understand Chapters 4 and 5, one should read Chapter 3 first. If one finds some difficulties, then one is referred to Appindices A and B. Chapters 7 and 8 can be read independently, but it will be more instructive to read both in parallel. Chapter 6 can be read separately which requires more knowledge of Bessel functions. Because of lack of time, we could not state much about them. This publication was supported by Kinki University Grant for Publication, No. GK04 in the academic year 2006. The authors are thankful to Kinki University for their generosity of this support. They also would like to thank Ms. Chiew Ying Oi who helped them all through the process with her efficient editorial skills. And toward the end of the process Ms. Zhang Ji supported us and we would like to express our heartily thanks to her. The authors would like to express their hearty thanks to their close friend Professor Y. Tanigawa for his constant support, encouragement, and stimulating discussions. The first author would like to thank his close friend Professor Heng Huat Chan for his enlightening remark on the equivalent statements to the functional equation, thanks to which he got motivated enough to start writing this book. The second author was naturally got infected the passion of the first. Thanks are also due to Ms. L.-P. Ding and Mr. M. Toda for their devoted endeavor, without their enthusiastic help, the book would have not been risen out. the authors

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

Contents

Preface

vii

1. The theory of Bernoulli and allied polynomials

1

2. The theory of the gamma and related functions

29

2.1 Gamma function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 The Euler digamma function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The theory of the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta-functions 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5

Introduction . . . . . . . Integral representations A formula of Ramanujan Some definite integrals . The functional equation

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

29 42 51

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

. . . . .

4. The theory of Bernoulli polynomilas via zeta-functions

51 54 62 65 70 77

5. The theory of the gamma and related functions via zeta-functions 81 5.1 Derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta-function . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2 Asymptotic formulas for the Hurwitz and related zetafunctions in the second variable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 An application of the Euler digamma function . . . . . . . . 5.4 The first circle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. The theory of Bessel functions and the Epstein zeta-functions

81 91 93 97 105

6.1 Introduction and the theory of Bessel functions . . . . . . . 105 xi

March 27, 2007

17:14


xii

vista


6.2 The theory of Epstein zeta-functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6.3 Lattice zeta-functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 6.4 Bessel series expansions for Epstein zeta-functions . . . . . 125 7. Fourier series and Fourier transforms 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4

Fourier series . . . Integral transforms Fourier transform . Mellin transform .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

131 . . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

8. Around Dirichlet’s L-functions

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

. . . .

131 151 158 161 165

8.1 The theory of periodic Dirichlet series . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 8.2 The Dirichlet class number formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 8.3 Proof of the theorems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Appendix A Complex functions

183

A.1 Function series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 A.2 Residue theorem and its applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 Appendix B Summation formulas and convergence theorems

197

B.1 Summation formula and its applications . . . . . . . . . . . 197 B.2 Application to the Riemann zeta-function . . . . . . . . . . 202 Bibliography

207

Index

213

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

Chapter 1

The theory of Bernoulli and allied polynomials

Abstract In this chapter we shall develop the theory of Bernoulli polynomials in a way different from many existing books in that we shall reveal the relationships between the Propositions (D’)-(H) and that any one of them (or a combination thereof) can be adopted as a definition of Bernoulli polynomials (cf. Fig. 1. 5 for loose equivalence). Our intension is not to provide a proof of the exact equivalence but equivalence in a loose sense (e.g. up to the initial condition or the normalization) so that the reader can have a better grasp of the formulas scattered around the literature ([B¨ oh], [Ca], [Erd], [Ni]). We shall also state some facts about the cyclotomic polynomials (used in Chapter 2.) We adopt Lehmer’s terminology [Leh2]. Definition 1.1 The Bernoulli polynomial Bn (x) of degree n (n = 0, 1, 2, . . .) can be defined by either of the following defining conditions. (D0 ) (Appell sequence 1832) Bn0 (x) = n Bn−1 (x)

(1.1)

with initial value B0 (x) = 1 and with normalization Z 1 Bn (x) dx = 0 (n ∈ N). 0

If we know the differentiation formula (D 0 ), it is immediate to calculate the k-th derivative: 1

March 27, 2007

2

17:14


vista


Fig. 1.1

Bn(k) (x) =

Jacob Bernoulli

n! Bn−k (x). (n − k)!

(1.2)

By (1.2) we have the Taylor expansion n

Bn (x) = (B + x) =

n X n

k=0

k

Bn−k (0) xk ,

and the normalization condition amounts to the recurrence n−1 X k=0

n Bk (0) = 0, k

n ≥ 2.

(1.3)

We denote the value Bn (0) by Bn and refer to it as the n-th Bernoulli number. Throughout in what follows we understand they are defined by (1.3) once and for all. Another definition by (1.6) leads to the same recurrence as (1.3) and these two definitions are consistent (cf. Remark 1.1).

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

3


(A) Addition formula Bn (x + y) =

n X n k=0

=

k

n X n k=0

k

Bn−k (x) y k Bn−k (y) xk .

(U ) Umbral calculus formula (Lucas 1891) The n-th Bernoulli polynomial can be expressed as (B + x)n : n X n Bn (x) = (B + x)n = Bn−k xk , k

(1.4)

k=0

i.e. (1.7), where, by umbral calculus, we mean that after expanding the binomial, the exponent of B is to be degraded to subscript. Theorem 1.1 The defining conditions in Definition 1.1 are equivalent to conditions (DE)-(H). (DE) {Bn (x)} are (principal) solutions of the difference equation ∆Bn (x) = Bn (x + 1) − Bn (x) = n xn−1 , where ∆ signifies the difference operator ∆u(x) = u(x + 1) − u(x). (G) Generating functionology (Euler 1738). Bernoulli polynomials Bn (x) are defined as the Taylor coefficients of the generating function ∞ X Bn (x) n z exz = z z e − 1 n=0 n!

(|z| < 2π),

(1.5)

whence, in particular, Bn = Bn (0) are defined by the generating function ∞ X Bn n z = z z e − 1 n=0 n!

(|z| < 2π).

(1.6)

As will be indicated in Remark 1.1, it follows from (1.5) and (1.6) that Bn (x) is a polynomial of degree n given by n X n Bn (x) = Bn−k xk . (1.7) k k=0

(K) Kubert identity (Raabe 1851)

March 27, 2007

17:14


4

vista


Bn (x) is a monic polynomial of degree n satisfying Bn (x) = mn−1

m−1 X

Bn

k=0

x+k m

,

(1.8)

for each m ∈ N and x ∈ R. This identity is often referred to as the distribution property or the multiplication formula. (H) Fourier series (Hurwitz 1890) B n (x) = −

∞ X n! e2πikx , n (2πi) kn

(1.9)

k=−∞ k6=0

where B n (x) = Bn (x − [x]) , [x] being the integral part of x, for n ∈ N (in the case n = 1, we should have (7.9)). (S) Sums of powers (J. Bernoulli 1705?) As in Comtet [Com] let Z(n, r) =

n X

kr .

(1.10)

k=1

Then Z(n, r) =

1 (Br+1 (n + 1) − Br+1 ) , r+1

(r ∈ N)

(1.11)

(r ∈ N).

(1.12)

and r 1 X r+1 Bk · (n + 1)r+1−k , Z(n, r) = r+1 k k=0

This was known to Jacob Bernoulli in his Ars Conjectandi, 1713 (posthumously published; J. Bernoulli died in 1705, and so (S) may be proved in 1705? cf. Lehmer [Leh2]). Although Formula (1.9) has been known since 1713, numerous papers are still appearing which claim new closed formulas for Z(n, r) up to a certain r, say 1,000. z Remark 1.1 We note that the function z is analytic in |z| < 2π e −1 (including the origin cf. Theorem A.8), so that it has the Taylor expansion (1.6), which implies the recurrence (left-hand side of (1.3))= 0, n ≥ 2. z exz has its = 1, n = 1, in conformity with (1.3). On the other hand, z e −1

March 27, 2007

17:14



Fig. 1.2

vista

5

Ars Conjectandi

Taylor expansion in |z| < 2π, given by the Cauchy product (or sometimes called Abel convolution) ! ∞ ! ∞ X X xl B z k exz = zk zl , ez − 1 k! l! k=0

l=0

which establishes (1.7) on comparing the coefficients, i.e. (G)⇒(U ). The special case x = 1 gives n X n Bn (1) = Bk , k k=0

March 27, 2007

17:14


6

vista


Fig. 1.3

which reduces, by (1.3), to Bn (1) = Bn (0) = Bn ,

n≥2

(1.13)

and B1 (1) = −B1 . Example 1.1 We may calculate Bernoulli numbers from (1.3) or (G): 1 , B2k+1 = 0 (k ∈ N). The first few B0 = 1, B1 = − 21 , B2 = 16 , B4 = − 30 Bernoulli polynomials are: 1 B0 (x) = 1, B1 (x) = B0 x + B1 = x − , 2 1 B2 (x) = B0 x2 + 2B1 x + B2 = x2 − x + , 6 3 1 B3 (x) = B0 x3 + 3B1 x2 + 3B2 x + B3 = x3 − x2 + x, 2 2 B4 (x) = B0 x4 + 4B1 x3 + 6B2 x2 + 4B3 x + B4 1 1 = x4 − 2x3 + x2 − , B4 = − , 30 30 5 4 5 3 1 5 B5 (x) = x − x + x − x, 2 3 6 5 4 1 2 1 1 6 5 B6 (x) = x − 3x + x − x + , B6 = . 2 2 42 42 We shall prove the equivalence of some of the conditions (D 0 ) ∼ (H), some being left unproved. (D0 )⇒(A) Indeed, (A) is nothing but the Taylor expansion of Bn (x + y) in y, and n! (k) the Taylor coefficient is Bn (x), which is Bn−k (x) by (1.2), whence (n − k)!

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

7

we have (A). (A)⇒(D0 ) For y 6= 0 we have

n Bn (x + y) − Bn (x) X n = Bn−k (x) y k−1 , y k k=1

whence we deduce Bn0 (x) = n Bn−1 (x). (A)⇒(U ) We note that the umbral calculus formula (U ) is the special case of (A) with y = 0. (U )⇒(A) We have by (1.4) Bn (x + y) =

n X n

k

k=0

=

n X n

k

k=0

=

Bn−k (x + y)k Bn−k

k X k l=0

n X n X n k

k

l=0 k=l

l

l

y k−l xl

Bn−k y k−l xl ,

where we have changed the order of summation. Applying the formula n k n n−l = , (1.14) k l l k−l we obtain Bn (x + y) =

n X n l=0

=

l

n X n l=0

l

y

l

n X n−l k=l

yl

k−l

Bn−k xk−l

n−l X n−l k=0

k

Bn−l−k xk ,

by the change of variable. Now the inner sum is Bn−l (x) by (1.7). (U )⇒(DE) is proved in the following

(1.15)

March 27, 2007

17:14


8

vista


Exercise 1.1

Deduce (DE) and the reciprocal relation Bn (1 − x) = (−1)n Bn (x)

(1.16)

from umbral calculus (U ). Solution

By (A), on using (1.15), Bn (1 + y) =

n X n

l

l=0

y l Bn−l (1),

(1.17)

which is Bn (1 + y) = Bn (y) + n y n−1 , by (1.3) and (1.4), and (DE) follows. By (1.13) and (1.17) Bn (1 − x) =

n X n l=0

l

(−x)l (−1)n−l Bn−l

which is (−1)n Bn (x) by (1.4). (U )⇒(D0 ) 0

Bk (x) =

k X k r=1

r

Bk−r r xr−1

k (s + 1)Bk−1−s xs s + 1 s=0 k−1 X k − 1 =k Bk−1−s xs s s=0 =

k−1 X

= kBk−1 (x). Proof of

Z

1 0

Bn (x) dx = 0 for n ∈ N. Z

1

Bn (x) dx = 0

n X n

k=0

k

Bn−k

Z

1

xk dx

0

n 1 X n+1 Bn−k n+1 k+1 k=0 n+1 1 X n+1 = Bn+1−k . n+1 k

=

k=1

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

9


Pn+1 n+1 Now the sum is k=0 k Bn+1−k − Bn+1 , which is Bn+1 (1) − Bn+1 by R 1 (1.4); this is in turn Bn+1 (0) − Bn+1 by (1.16) and is 0. Note that 0 B0 (x) dx = 1. (A)⇒(DE) By (A)

Bn (x + 1) − Bn (x) = =

n X n k=0

k

Bn−k (1) xk − Bn−k xk

n (B1 (1) − B1 ) xn−1 n−1

= n xn−1 on using (1.13). (G)⇐⇒(U ) (G)⇒(U ) is proved in Remark 1.1.

(U )⇒(G): We form the generating function (1.4) to get ∞ ∞ X Bn (x) n X 1 z = n! n! n=0 n=0 ∞ X

=

k=0

=

ez

X

k+l=n

Bk k z k!

!

z exz , −1

∞ X Bn (x) n z and substitute n! n=0

n! B k xl k! l! ∞ X xl l=0

l!

z

!

l

zn

!

whence (1.5) follows. (H)⇒(K) Substituting (1.9) into the right-hand side of (1.8), we obtain m

n−1

m−1 X k=0

Bn

x+k m

=−

x m−1 ∞ X n! e2πi m r n 1 X 2πi r k e m . m (2πi)n r=−∞ rn m

r6=0

k=0

March 27, 2007

17:14


10


The inner sum is 0 except when r is a multiple of m by (8.5). Hence the ∞ X n! e2πixr right-hand side becomes − , which is B n (x). (2πi)n r=−∞ rn r6=0

To extend the range (0, 1) to R we may refer to Milnor’s argument [Mi, Lemma 7]. (G)⇒(K) Consider the generating function ∞ m−1 X X

Bn

n=0 k=0

=

x+k m

m−1 X mz emz x+k m (mz)n = mz n! e −1 k=0

∞ X ze zn e −1 mz e = m = m Bn (x) , mz z z e −1 e −1 e − 1 n=0 n! xz

xz

mz

whence (1.8) follows. (DE)⇒(S) This follows on summing (DE) with x = 0, 1, · · · , n. Although the above implication is the most natural, we may also apply (G) to deduce (S). (G)⇒(1.11) Consider the generating function fn (z) =

∞ X Z(n, r)

z r+1 .

r!

r=0

On one hand we have fn (z) =

∞ X (r + 1) Z(n, r) r=0

(r + 1)!

z r+1 ,

and on the other, substituting (1.10), we have fn (z) = z

∞ n n X ∞ X X 1 1 X r r k z =z (kz)r , r! r! r=0 r=0 k=1

k=1

whence fn (z) = z

n X

k=1

ekz .

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

11

Rewriting the sum of the geometric series appearing above as z

e(n+1)z − ez ze(n+1)z z = z − z − z, z e −1 e −1 e −1

we have fn (z) =

∞ X zr r=0

r!

Br (n + 1) −

∞ X zr r=0

r!

Br − z

by (G), whence fn (z) =

∞ X r=1

(Br+1 (n + 1) − Br+1 )

z r+1 + nz; (r + 1)!

but for r = 0: Z(n, 0) = B1 (n + 1) − B1 − 1 = n, and so fn (z) =

∞ X r=0

(Br+1 (n + 1) − Br+1 )

z r+1 . (r + 1)!

Hence (G)⇒(1.11) by comparison of the coefficients. (1.12) follows from (1.11) by (U ). We proceed to give another explicit expression for Br : Br =

r X (−1)n r + 1 Z(n, r). n+1 n+1 n=0

(1.18)

We shall deduce (1.18) from (1.12) with the help of (1.19) which gives the closed form for the Stirling number of the second kind (cf. (1.20)) k 1 X j k (−1) (k − j)n S(n, k) = k! j=0 j k 1 X k−i k (−1) = in k! i=1 i

=

1 k n ∆ 0 , k!

1 ≤ k ≤ n,

(1.19)

March 27, 2007

17:14


12

vista


where ∆ is defined in (DE). These are defined as the coefficients in the fundamental relation x , ∆ 0 S(k, j)(x)j = x = j j=1 j=1

k X

k

k X

j k

(1.20)

where (x)j = x(x − 1) · · · (x − j + 1) indicates the falling factorial. The last equality of (1.19) can be proved as follows: k X j=0

(−1)j

k X k k E k−j 0n (−1)j (k − j)n = j j j=0 = (E − 1)k 0n = ∆k 0n ,

with E = ∆ + 1 the shift operator. (1.20)⇒(1.19) Applying the shift operator, Eu(n) = u(n + 1), n-times, we obtain nn = E n 0 n . The left-hand side is the same as that of (1.20), while on the RHS, we apply E = ∆ + 1 formally n-times to deduce that E n 0n = (∆ + 1)n 0n =

n X n j=0

j

∆j 0 n =

n X 1 j n ∆ 0 (n)j , j! j=1

whence (1.19) follows. Substituting (1.12) into the right-hand side of (1.18), we have r r X (−1)n r + 1 1 X r+1 the RHS = Bk (n + 1)r+1−k n + 1 r + 1 n + 1 k n=0 k=0 X r r X r+1 r+1 1 (n + 1)r−k (−1)n Bk = n + 1 r+1 k n=0 k=0 X r r X 1 r+1 r+j r + 1 = (−1) Bk (r + 1 − j)r−k r+1 k j j=0 k=0

on changing the order of summation and then writing r − n = j. Divide

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

13


the sum over k into two: 0 ≤ k ≤ r − 1 and k = r.  r−1 r+1 X 1 X r + 1 r j r+1 RHS = Bk (−1) (−1) (r + 1 − j)r−k r+1 k j j=0 k=0   r+1 X r + 1 +Br  (−1)j − (−1)r+1  j j=0 =

r+1 1 X r+1 Bk (−1)r (r + 1)!S(r − k, r + 1) + (−1)r Br , r+1 k k=0

r

= (−1) Br = Br ,

where we used the fact that S(n, r) = 0 for 1 ≤ n < r and r+1 X

(−1)

j=0

j

r+1 = (1 − 1)r+1 = 0, j

completing the proof of (1.18). We shall state an example of (S). Example 1.2 n X

1 (B3 (n + 1) − B3 ) 3 k=1 1 3 1 = (n + 1) (n + 1)2 − (n + 1) + 3 2 2 1 = (n + 1)(2n2 + 4n + 2 − 3n − 3 + 1) 6 1 = n(n + 1)(2n + 1). 6

Z(n, 2) =

k2 =

Compared with (S), the following is less well-known ([Com, p.155]): Proposition 1.1 r+1 X n Z(n, r) = (j − 1)! S(r + 1, j) . j j=1

(1.21)

March 27, 2007

17:14


14

vista


Proof.

By induction, for n + 1, the RHS is r+1 X 1 j=1

we rewrite (n + 1)j as r+1 X 1 j=1

j

j

S(r + 1, j)(n + 1)j ,

j n+1−j +j =1+ to obtain n+1−j n+j−1

S(r + 1, j)(n)j +

r+1 X j=1

S(r + 1, j)n · · · (n − j + 2),

the first term is Z(n, r) by hypothesis and the second can be written as r+1

1 X S(r + 1, j)(n + 1)j , n + 1 j=1 which is

1 (n + 1)r+1 = (n + 1)r , on applying (1.20). n+1

The second proof. We first prepare auxiliary results. First, n X j n+1 = , 0 ≤ k ≤ n. k k+1

(1.22)

j=k

This may be proved by writing (x + 1)n+1 − 1 in two ways: First, it is n

X (x + 1)n+1 − 1 x= (x + 1)j x, x j=0 which becomes j n X X j j=0 k=0

k

xk+1 =

n X n X j

k=0 j=k

k

xk+1

by changing the order of summation. Since (x + 1)n+1 − 1 =

n P

k=0

n+1 k+1

xk+1 ,

we obtain (1.22) by comparing the coefficients of xk+1 . Secondly, we also need the triangular recurrence formula for S(r, j): S(r + 1, j) = S(r, j − 1) + j S(r, j),

1 ≤ j ≤ r + 1.

This may be proved by writing xr+1 in (1.20) in two ways:

(1.23)

March 27, 2007

17:14



On one hand, it is

r+1 P

vista

15

S(r + 1, j)(x)j , and on the other, it is

j=0

x · xr = x

r X

S(r, j)(x)j .

j=0

Since x (x)j = (x − j + j)x(x − 1) · · · (x − j + 1) = (x)j+1 + j(x)j ,

we have xr+1 =

r X j=1

(S(r, j − 1) + j S(r, j)) (x)j ,

whence (1.23) follows by comparing the coefficients. We may now prove (1.21). Substituting (1.20), we obtain Z(n, r) =

r X j=1

S(r, j) j!

n X k

k=1

j

after inverting the order of summation. We rewrite the innermost sum as n−1 X k n n n + = + j j j j+1 k=1

by (1.22). Hence Z(n, r) =

r+1 X j=1

n n S(r, j) j! + S(r, j − 1) (j − 1)! j j

n = (j S(r, j) + S(r, j − 1)) (j − 1)! , j j=1 r+1 X

which is the RHS of (1.21) in view of (1.23). Example 1.3

We take up the special case of (1.21). n Z(n, 2) = (j − 1)! S(3, j). j j=1 3 X

March 27, 2007

17:14


16


Since from (1.19) we have S(3, 1) = 1, S(3, 2) = 3, S(3, 3) = 1, it follows that

n n S(3, 2) + 2! S(3, 3) 2 3 1 3 = n + n(n − 1) + n(n − 1)(n − 2) 2 3 1 2 = n(2n + 3n + 1) 6 1 = n(n + 1)(2n + 1). 6

Z(n, 2) = S(3, 1)n +

Exercise 1.2

Prove that (H) implies (U ) under Euler’s identity (5.66).

Solution Since B1 (x) = x − 12 for 0 < x < 1, the unique polynomial that coincides with B 1 (x) is B1 (x) = x − 21 = x + B1 . Denoting the right-hand side of (1.9) by bn (x), we obtain 1 d bn (x) = bn−1 (x), n dx whence 1 dn bn (x) = B1 (x), n! dxn Integrating

0 < x < 1.

1 d 2 dx b2 (x)

= B1 (x), we deduce that Z 1 1 b2 (x) = B1 (x) dx = x2 + B1 x + C, 2 2

where ∞ 1 1 2 X 1 1 1 C = b2 (0) = = 2 ζ(2) = = B2 2 2 π 2 n=1 n2 π 6

by (5.66). Repeating this procedure, each time using (5.66), we arrive at (U ). Now we shall follow Lehmer [Leh2] to deduce some of the above defining conditions from (K). First we state a lemma. Lemma 1.1 (Lehmer) For a given n ∈ N there is a unique monic polynomial of degree n satisfying (1.8).

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

17

Proof. That Bn (x) satisfies (1.8) is a consequence of (3.69) and (4.1). To prove uniqueness, suppose there are two polynomials Pn (x) and Qn (x) of degree n satisfying the conditions. Then Rr (x) := Pn (x) − Qn (x) = a0 xr + a1 xr−1 + · · · , where Rr (x) is a polynomial of degree r < n satisfying (1.8): m X x+k Rr mn−1 = Rr (x). m k=0

Identifying the coefficients of xr on both sides, we obtain r 1 n m a0 = a 0 , m

which contradicts the fact that r < n and a0 6= 0. This completes the proof.

Theorem 1.2 (Lehmer) For n, m ∈ N, there exists a unique monic polynomial of degree n satisfying the functional equation m−1 x+k 1 X f = m−n f (x). (1.24) m m k=0

Proof. Since for m = 1, (1.24) reduces to a trivial equality, we may assume that m > 1. We substitute a candidate polynomial Pn (x) = b0 xn + b1 xn−1 + · · · + bn ,

b0 6= 0

with bk as indeterminates, into (1.24). If f satisfies (1.24), then so does any multiple of f , so that we may assume b0 = 1. The left-hand side of (1.24) becomes X m−1 n n−ν X 1 X x+k n−ν Pn = bν xn−ν−µ m−n+ν−1 Z(m − 1, µ) m m µ ν=0 µ=0 k=0 n r X X n−ν = m−n xn−r bν mν−1 Z(m − 1, r − ν). r − ν r=0 ν=0 This must be equal to the right-hand side of (1.24): m−n Pn (x) =

n X r=0

xn−r br m−n .

March 27, 2007

17:14


18

vista


Identifying the coefficients of xn−r , we conclude that m

−n

r

(m − 1)br = −m

Now, from Z(n, 1) =

−n

r−1 X

bk

k=0

n−k mk−1 Z(m − 1, r − k). r−k

(1.25)

n(n+1) , 2

it follows that n b1 = B1 . 1

Suppose inductively that b1 , · · · , br−1 (r > 1) are determined. Then (1.25) determines br , completing the induction. We note that by elaborating the above proof, we may actually prove Proposition 1.2 The only polynomial satisfying (1.24) must be Bn (x), on the ground of (U ), (A) and (1.16). Proof. Indeed, suppose inductively that bk = nk Bk , k < r. Then the right-hand side of (1.25) is −m

−n

r−1 X n n−k k=0

r−k

k

Bk mk−1 Z(m − 1, r − k).

The product of binomial coefficients is RHS = −m

−n

n r

r k

, and so

X r−k r−1 X r − k + 1 n r 1 k−1 Bl mr−k+1−l . Bk m r−k+1 l r k l=0

k=0

Now the innermost sum is mr−k+1 +

r−k X l=1

r−k+1 r−k Bl mr−k−(l−1) . l l−1

Hence RHS = −m−n+r

n n S1 − m−m S2 , r r

where S1 =

r−1 X r

k=0

k

Bk

1 r−k+1

(1.26)

March 27, 2007

17:14


The theory of Bernoulli and allied polynomials r−1 X r

S2 =

r−k X 1 r−k Bk Bl mr−l . l l−1 k

k=0

r k

Rewriting the product r−l+1 r l−1 r−k−l+1 , we obtain

vista

19

(1.27)

l=1

r−k l−1

of binomial coefficients in S2 by

r−l r X X r 1 r−l+1 r−l Bl m S2 = Bk l l−1 r−k−l+1 k=0

l=1

whose innermost sum is r−l r−l+1 X X r − l + 1 r−l+1 Bk = Bk − Br−l+1 k k k=0

k=0

= Br−l+1 (1) − Br−l+1 ( 1, l = r = 0, l 6= r

by (U ) and (1.16) successively. Since the last member is 0 except when l = r, we infer that r 1 Br = B r . (1.28) S2 = r r−1 On the other hand, S1 = =

Z

r−1 1X

0 k=0

Z 1 r r−k (Br (x) − Br ) dx Bk x dx = k 0

1 (Br+1 (1) − Br+1 (0)) − Br = −Br . r+1

Hence LHS = −m or m whence

−n

r

−n+r

n −n n (−Br ) − m Br r r

(m − 1)br = −(m

−n

−m

n br = Br , r

−n+r

n ) Br , r

March 27, 2007

17:14


20

vista


completing the proof. Exercise 1.3 Solution

With Bn (x) as defined by Theorem 1.2, prove (1.5).

Let F (x, t) =

t ext et − 1

and expand it into the Taylor series in t: F (x, t) =

∞ X 1 Gn (x)tn , n! n=0

|t| < 2π

(1.29)

with Gn (x) a polynomial of degree n, (n)

Gn (x) = a0 xn + · · · + a(n) n , say. (n) We may determine a0 as follows: Replacing x by (1.29), we get

1 y

and t by ty in

∞ X 1 n 1 n yt t e = y G t , n eyt − 1 n! y n=0 which leads, as y → 0, to ∞ X 1 (n) n a0 t e = n! n=0 t

(since y n Gn

(n)

Hence a0 Now,

1 y

(n)

→ a0 ):

= 1 and Gn is monic.

m−1 ∞ m−1 1 XX 1 1 X x+k n x+k t = F Gn ,t m n! m m m n=0 k=0

k=0

=

m−1 X x+k t 1 e m t m et − 1 k=0

x

1 t emt , = m e mt − 1

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

21


which is equal to

t F x, m

=

∞ X 1 1 Gn (x) n tn . n! m n=0 1 n n! t ,

Hence, comparing the coefficients of

we-conclude that

m−1 x+k 1 X Gn = m−n Gn (x), m m k=0

whence, by Theorem 1.2, that Gn (x) = Bn (x), completing the proof. Lemma 1.2 DE

For every m ∈ N there is a unique polynomial satisfying the f (z + 1) − f (z) =

m X m k=1

k

bk z m−k ,

b1 6= 0

(1.30)

with the initial condition f (1) = 0. Proof. form

From (1.30), f (z) must be of degree m and may be put in the

f (z) =

m X m j=0

j

aj z m−j ,

a0 6= 0.

(1.31)

Forming the difference f (z + 1) − f (z), thereby using the expansion m−j aj z m−j−r r r=1 m X m−j = aj z m−k , k−j

(z + 1)m−j − z m−j =

m−j X

k=j+1

we find that f (z + 1) − f (z) =

m X j=0

aj

m X m m − j m−k z . j k−j

k=j+1

Using (1.14), we get m m−j m m−j m k m k = = = . j k−j m−j m−k m−k k−j k j

March 27, 2007

17:14


22

vista


Hence f (z + 1) − f (z) =

m X m k=1

k

 

m−1 X j=0



k aj  z m−k . j

(1.32)

Comparing (1.30) and (1.32), we see that it is enough to show that the following system of m+1 linear equations in m+1 unknowns a0 , a1 , · · · , am and f (z) has a unique solution: k−1 X j=0

k aj = b k , j

k = 1, 2, · · · , m

(1.33)

m aj z m−j + f (z) = am . j

(1.34)

and −

m−1 X j=0

This is indeed the case because the coefficient matrix is lower triangular, its determinant is the product of all diagonal components so that m 1 2 · · · m−1 = m! 6= 0. Hence f (z) is determined by b1 , · · · , bm and am . 0 1 Now, comparing (1.33) with k = m and (1.34) with z = 1, we find that am = bm by the condition f (1) = 0. Hence f (z) is determined uniquely by b1 , · · · , bm . Theorem 1.3 For each m ∈ N there exists a unique polynomial fm (z) satisfying the conditions fm (z + 1) − fm (z) = mz m−1

(1.35)

fm (1) = 0.

(1.36)

And the m-th Bernoulli polynomial Bm (z) is defined by Bm (z) = fm (z) + Bm (1). Proof. 0.

(1.37)

This is a special case of Lemma 1.2 with b1 = 1, b2 = · · · = bm =

Remark 1.2 As is remarked in [Mi, p.284] , the r + 1-st Bernoulli polynomial can be characterized as the unique polynomial satisfying (1.11) for every natural number r. Hence (S) can be also used as the definition as (K) and (DE).

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

23


Lemma 1.3

Under (G), Formula (1.37) implies

0 fm (z) = mBm−1 (z) = m(fm−1 (z) + Bm−1 ),

m ∈ N ∪ {0}.

(1.38)

If we differentiate with respect to z

Proof.

∞ X fm (z) m x x ex x = x exz − x , m! e −1 e −1 m=0

we obtain ∞ ∞ ∞ 0 X X X x2 Bm (z) m+1 Bm−1 (z) m fm (z) m x = x exz = x = x , m! e − 1 m! (m − 1)! m=0 m=1 m=0

whence we have 1 0 f (z) = Bm−1 (z), m m

m ∈ N,

and f00 (z) = 0, which amounts to (1.38). Proposition 1.3

(DE) and (G) together imply (K).

Proof. We shall prove that Theorem 1.3 and Lemma 1.3 imply the Kubert identity for fm (z): fm (qz) = q m−1

q−1 X k=0

k + (q m−1 − 1)Bm (1) fm z + q

(1.39)

for any q ∈ N. We follow B¨ ohmer [B¨ oh] to add (1.35) in the form fm+1 (z + 1) = fm (z) + (m + 1)z m to the trivial identity q

m

q−2 X

fm+1

k=0

k+1 z+ q

=q

m

q−1 X

fm+1

k=1

k z+ q

to obtain q

m

q−1 X

k=0

fm+1

k+1 z+ q

=q

m

q−1 X

k=0

fm+1

k z+ q

+ (m + 1)q m z m . (1.40)

March 27, 2007

17:14


24

vista


Now subtract (1.40) from fm+1 (qz + 1) = fm+1 (qz) + (m + 1)q m z m to deduce that

q−1 X

k+1 fm+1 z + fm+1 (qz + 1) − q q k=0 q−1 X k fm+1 z + = fm+1 (qz) − q m q m

(1.41)

k=0

= F (z),

say, whence 1 = F (z) F z+ q i.e. F (z) is periodic of period 1q . But, F (z) being a polynomial, we must have F (z) = constant. Hence differentiating (1.41), we infer that 0 qfm+1 (qz)

−q

or q(fm (qz) + Bm (1)) − q

m

m

q−1 X

0 fm+1

k=0

q−1 X k=0

fm+1

k z+ q

k z+ q

= 0,

+ Bm (1)

= 0,

by Lemma 1.3. This amounts to (1.39), thereby completing the proof.

Remark 1.3 Since (DE) and (K) correspond to differentiation and integration, respectively, we need an extra information (i.e. (G)) in Proposition 1.3 to deduce a result on integration from that on differentiation. We also remark that Pan and Sun’s result [Su2] implies differentiation from differencing for polynomials, which enables us to prove (D’)+(DE)⇒(K). Indeed, differencing the right-hand side of (1.8), we Pm−1 d d Bn x+k = dx Bn (x), or get ∆(Bn (x)), which implies mn−1 k=0 dx m P m−1 n x+k n−1 m = n Bn−1 (x) by (1.1), whence (1.8) ensues. k=0 m Bn−1 m

Finally, we add the following as a memorial of the work of L. Lagrange, who was a contemporary of Euler, which is often used in number-theoretic settings.

17:14



(D ′ )

⇔

( A)

⇔

⇔

⇓⇓ (G ) ⇓

(S ) ⇑

(DE ) Fig. 1.4

Fig. 1.5

(U )

⇒ ⇐

(H ) ⇓

⇔

March 27, 2007

⇐ (K )

⇑

Logical scheme

L. Lagrange

vista

25

March 27, 2007

17:14


26

vista


The Lagrange Interpolation Method says that: Given n values g(αi ), 1 ≤ i ≤ n of a function g(x) at n distinct arguments αi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n, the Lagrange interpolation polynomial is defined by L(x) =

n X i=1

f (x) g(αi ) (x − αi ) f 0 (αi )

(1.42)

interpolates g(x) (L(αi ) = g(αi )), where f (x) =

n Y

i=1

(x − xi ).

Example 1.4 (Carlitz [Car]) Let k1 , k2 , · · · , kn be pairwise relatively prime positive integers and let gi (x) =

n−1 Y xk i − 1 x − ζil , = x−1 l=1

1 ≤ i ≤ n,

where ζi signifies a primitive ki -th root of 1. Further put fi (x) = (x − 1) gi (x) = xki − 1 =

n−1 Y l=1

x − ζil

and Gi (x) =

Y

k6=i

gk (x),

1 ≤ i ≤ n.

(1.43)

Then the polynomial Li (x) =

n−1 1 X fi (x) 1 ζik + φi (1) gi (x) k k ki x − ζi Gi (ζi ) ki k=1

(1.44)

interpolates the polynomial φi (x) of degree < ki − 1 such that n X

Gi (x) φi (x) = 1.

i=1

Proof. We note the following facts. Since fi0 (x) = ki xki −1 , we have, for a primitive ki -th root of 1 and 1 ≤ l ≤ n − 1, l(k −1) fi0 ζil = ki ζi i = ki ζi−l .

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

27

Also Gi ζil = 0 for k 6= i, 6= 0 for k = i. Hence by (1.43), n X Gi ζil φi ζil = 1. Gi ζil φi ζil = k=1

Now note that the polynomial Li (x) =

n−1 X k=1

fi (x) φi ζik 1 + φi (1) gi (x) k k 0 ki x − ζ i f i ζi

(1.45)

is the Lagrange interpolation of gi (1) = ki . polynomial for φi (x) in view 1 , so that (1.45) From the above data, fi0 ζik = ki ζi−k and φi (ζik ) = Gi (ζ k i ) transforms into (1.44). This identity is essentially used in the proof of the three-term relation of the Dedekind sum, which is a finite sum of the product of two first periodic Bernoulli polynomials. Qn Example 1.5 Let f (x) = i=1 (x − αi ) be an irreducible polynomial over Q (αi being necessarily distinct and called conjugates). Then f (x) αr = xr , 0 ≤ r ≤ n − 1, Tr x − α f 0 (α) where α = α1 , say, and Tr means the sum of conjugate elements. This is because, by the Lagrange interpolation xr =

n X αri f (x) 0 x − αi f (αi ) i=1

and all summands on the right are conjugate one another, so that the righthand side is the trace. This is essentially used to find the dual basis in a finite extension of Q.

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

Chapter 2

The theory of the gamma and related functions

Abstract In this chapter we develop the standard theory of the gamma and related functions in a classical fashion starting from the Eulerian integral of the second kind. We follow partly B¨ ohmer [B¨ oh] and Hata [Hata] (cf. also Erd´elyi et al [Erd]). Most of the results in this chapter are restated from the zeta-function theoretic point of view in Chapter 5, which can be read parallel to the present chapter.

2.1

Gamma function

First, we develop the theory of the gamma function defined by (2.1), one of equivalent conditions to be discussed in Chapter 5. The gamma function, being the Mellin transform of e−x to be mentioned in §7.4, is defined by the Eulerian integral of the second kind Z ∞ Γ(s) = e−x xs−1 dx (2.1) 0

for σ > 0. This improper integral is absolutely and uniformly convergent in the wide sense in σ > 0, whence it follows that Γ(s) is analytic in the right half-plane σ > 0. The gamma function may be continued meromorphically over the whole plane by the difference relation Γ(s) =

Γ (s + n + 1) , s (s + 1) · · · (s + n) 29

n ∈ N ∪ {0}.

(2.2)

March 27, 2007

17:14


30

vista


Fig. 2.1

Euler

Indeed, for σ > 0, we have by integration by parts, Γ(s) =

1 −x s e x s

∞ 0

−

1 s

Z

∞

e−x xs dx =

0

1 Γ(s + 1), s

(2.3)

whose right-hand side is analytic for σ > −1. From (2.2) we see that s = −n, n ∈ N ∪ {0} are simple poles and that the residues at these poles are Res Γ(s) =

s=−n

(−1)n . n!

(2.4)

Also if we put s = n ∈ N in Γ(s + 1) = s Γ(s),

(2.5)

then we have Γ(n + 1) = n!, which means that the gamma function is a function which interpolates the factorial n!.

March 27, 2007

17:14



Exercise 2.1

The generalized binomial coefficient is defined by Γ(z + 1) z (z)r = = r! Γ(r + 1) Γ(z + 1 − r) r

vista

31

(2.6)

for r ∈ N ∪ {0}, where (z)r = z(z − 1) · · · (z − r + 1) indicates the falling factorial. Show that for n ∈ N ∪ {0} z r n+r−1 lim = (−1) (2.7) z→−n r r and confirm that the usual definition −n r n+r−1 = (−1) r r is realized as the limit (2.7). Solution

Writing by (2.2)

Γ(z + n + 1) (z + 1 − r) · · · (z + n) Γ(z + 1) = Γ(z + 1 − r) (z + 1) · · · (z + n) Γ(z + n + 1) (z + 1 − r) · · · (z + n − 1) = , (z + 1) · · · (z + n − 1) we see that (−n + 1 − r) · · · (−1) Γ(z + 1) → Γ(z + 1 − r) (−n + 1) · · · (−1) (−1)n+r−1 (n + r − 1)! = (−1)n−1 (n − 1)! as z → −n. By (2.5), this is (−1)

+ r) r n+r−1 = (−1) r!, Γ(n) r

r Γ(n

and (2.7) follows. Remark 2.1 In contrast to (λ)r , hλir indicates the Pochhammer symbol (or the shifted factorial, since h1ir = r!) defined by ( 1 (r = 0) Γ(λ + r) = hλir := Γ(λ) λ (λ + 1) · · · (λ + r − 1) (r ∈ N) .

March 27, 2007

17:14


32

vista


The following formula (Prym’s decomposition) extracts all poles of the gamma function and renders visible its behavior at the poles (cf. (2.4)): Z ∞ ∞ X (−1)n 1 Γ(s) = + e−x xs dx. n! s + n 1 n=0

(2.8)

The improper integral is absolutely and uniformly convergent in any disc |s| < R and represents an integral function. The proof follows on dividing the interval of integration and noting that Z

1

x

s−1

0

Z ∞ ∞ ∞ X X X (−1)n 1 n+s−1 (−1)n 1 (−1)n xn dx = . x dx = n! n! n! s + n 0 n=0 n=0 n=0

Let the beta function B(α, β) be defined by the Eulerian integral of the first kind B(α, β) = Exercise 2.2

Z

1 0

tα−1 (1 − t)β−1 dt,

Re α > 0, Re β > 0.

(2.9)

Prove the formula Γ(α) Γ(β) = Γ(α + β) B(α, β),

(2.10)

whence in particular Γ

√ 1 = π, 2

or the value of the probability integral Solution

R∞ 0

(2.11) 2

e−x dx =

√ π 2 .

First, in (2.9), put t = sin2 θ to obtain B(α, β) = 2

Z

π 2

sin2α−1 θ cos2β−1 θ dθ.

0

If in (2.1), we put t = x2 , then Γ(α) = 2

Z

0

∞

2

x2α−1 e−x dx,

(2.12)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

33


whence for Re α > 0, Re β > 0, Γ(α) Γ(β) = 4

Z

∞

2

x2α−1 e−x dx

0

Z

= 4 lim

X→∞

= 4 lim

X→∞

= 4 lim

X→∞

X

∞

2

y 2β−1 e−y dy

0 2

x2α−1 e−x dx

0

Z XZ Z0Z

Z

X

Z

X

2

y 2β−1 e−y dy

0

x2α−1 y 2β−1 e−(x

2

+y 2 )

!

dx dy

0

x2α−1 y 2β−1 e−(x

2

+y 2 )

dx dy,

(2.13)

D

n o p x where D = x2 + y 2 ≤ X . By the change of variable x = y 0 ≤ r cos θ, y = r sin θ, we have the correspondence r π ˜= D↔D , 0 ≤ r ≤ X, 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2 θ

where the absolute value of the Jacobian of this transformation is ∂(x,y) ∂(r,θ) = r. Hence ZZ 2 r2α+2β−2 e−r sin2α−1 θ cos2β−1 θ r drdθ Γ(α) Γ(β) = 4 lim X→∞

=2

Z

˜ D

∞

0

2

r2α+2β−1 e−r dr · 2

= Γ(α + β) B(α, β)

Z

π 2

sin2α−1 θ cos2β−1 θ dθ

0

by (2.12) above. This completes the proof of (2.10). Putting now α = β = 21 , we obtain Γ

2 Z π2 1 = Γ(1) 2 dθ = π, 2 0

whence (2.11) follows. It follows that Z

∞

e−

x2 2

dx =

√

2π,

−∞

which is used to normalize the distribution function of the Gaussian (or normal) distribution.

March 27, 2007

17:14


34


Remark 2.2 for α = β = 21 Z

vista

∞

e

−x2

0

dx

An ordinary procedure for proving (2.11) is to use (2.13)

2

= 4 lim

R→∞

Z

R

re

−r 2

dr

0

Z

π 2

dθ 0

!

∞ π 1 −r2 = π. =4 − e 2 0 2

Thus we see that if we generalize the problem by introducing the parameters α and β, we get a wider perspective. Exercise 2.3

Use the formula in Corollary A.4 to prove that π B(s, 1 − s) = sin πs

(2.14)

or Γ(s) Γ(1 − s) =

π , sin πs

(2.15)

the reciprocity relation for the gamma function, where 0 < s < 1 in the first place and then for all s except for integer values by analytic continuation. Solution

Make the substitution t = Z B(s, 1 − s) =

1 x+1 ∞ 0

in (2.9) to deduce that

x−s dx, 1+x

which proves (2.14) in view of Corollary A.4. Determine the value of the probability integral Γ 12 Z x 2 2 and g(x) = by considering two functions f (x) = e−t dt 0 Z 1 2 2 1 e−x (t +1) dt. 2+1 t 0 Exercise 2.4

Solution

Recalling the fundamental theorem of calculus, we obtain Z x 2 0 −x2 e−t dt. f (x) = 2 e 0

We may differentiate g(x) under the integral sign to get Z 1 1 d −x2 (t2 +1) 0 g (x) = e dt 2 0 t + 1 dx Z x Z 1 2 2 2 2 e−u du = −2x e−x (t +1) dt = −2 e−x 0

by the change of variable u = xt.

0

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

35

Hence we conclude that f 0 (x) + g 0 (x) = 0, whence by the Newton-Leibniz principle (cf. Lemma B.1) that f (x) + g(x) = f (0) + g(0) Z 1 1 π 1 dt = arctan(t) 0 = . = 2 t + 1 4 0

Now letting x → ∞, thereby noting that Z 1 2 2 1 lim g(x) = lim e−x (t +1) dt = 0, 2 x→∞ x→∞ 0 t +1 we conclude that lim f (x) =

x→∞

Z

∞

2

e−t dt

0

2

=

π , 4

i.e. Z Exercise 2.5

∞

e

−t2

dt =

0

√

π . 2

Use Formula (2.10) in the form

Γ(α) Γ(β) (2.16) Γ(α + β) √ and the value of the probability integral Γ 12 = π to deduce Wallis’ formula 2 2 · 4 · · · (2n) 1 π = lim . (2.17) n→∞ 1 · 3 · · · (2n − 1) 2 2n + 1 B(α, β) =

Solution

First, by (2.16) and (2.12) Z π2 Γ 12 Γ n + 12 1 1 =2 cos2n θ dθ = S2n , = B ,n+ Γ(n + 1) 2 2 0

say, and Γ

Z π2 Γ (n + 1) 1 , n + 1 = 2 = B cos2n+1 θ dθ = S2n+1 . 2 Γ(n + 32 ) 0 1 2

March 27, 2007

17:14


36

vista


Clearly, 0 < S2n+1 < S2n < S2n−1 , so that 1
0, c2 > 0 such that x x < π(x) < c2 . c1 log x log x Solution

First we note the inequalities hxi hxi 2 ≤ [x] ≤ 2 + 1. 2 2

(2.27)

x x The first one is trivial while the second one follows from − 1 < 2 2 or x x 0 such that |F (t)| = |F (t) − F (0)| < ε, 0 < t < δ. Now, divide the interval (0, ∞) into (0, δ) and (δ, ∞) to obtain ! Z ∞ Z ∞ Z δ −nt −nt −nt =O n f (t) e dt |F (t)| e dt + O n |F (t)| e dt 0 0 δ −nt ∞ −nt δ = O ε[−e ]0 + O [−e ]δ = O(ε) + O(e−nδ ),

which is O(ε) if n is big enough. This proves (2.39).

March 27, 2007

17:14


44

vista


Exercise 2.10 Deduce from (2.39) the integral representation for Euler’s constant defined by (5.16): Z ∞ f (t, 1) dt, (2.40) γ=− 0

where f (t, z) =

e−t e−zt − . t 1 − e−t

(2.41)

Prove the Gauss’ integral representation for the digamma function ψ defined by (5.18) Z ∞ Z ∞ −t e e−zt ψ(z) = f (t, z) dt = − dt, Re z > 0. (2.42) t 1 − e−t 0 0 R∞ Solution We notice that r1 = 0 e−rt dt, r ∈ N. Hence n X 1 r=1

r

=

Z

0

n ∞X r=1

e

−t r

Z

dt =

∞

0

1 − e−nt dt. 1 − e−t

By Exercise A.1, (A.2), we have also Z ∞ 1 − e−nt −t e dt. log(n + 1) = t 0

(2.43)

(2.44)

Subtracting (2.44) from (2.43), we obtain n X 1 r=1

r

− log(n + 1) = −

Z

∞ 0

−→ −

Z

f (t, 1) 1 − e−nt dt ∞

0

f (t, 1) dt, n → ∞

by Exercise 2.9. Hence, by definition, (2.40) follows. Let Z ∞ F (z) = f (t, z) dt, 0

the integral being (absolutely) convergent for Re z > 0. Then Z ∞ −t e − e−zt F (z) + γ = dt, 1 − e−t 0

(2.45)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

45


whence F (z + 1) − F (z) =

Z

∞

e−zt dt =

0

1 z

(2.46)

and F (1) + γ = 0, F (1) = −γ.

(2.47)

By the telescoping series technique, we obtain F (z) + γ = F (z) − F (1) =

n−1 X k=0

(F (z + k) − F (1 + k) − (F (z + k + 1) − F (z + k)))

+ F (z + n) − F (1 + n) 1 1 + F (z + n) − F (1 + n) − = 1+k z+k n−1 X

(2.48)

k=0

by (2.46). Hence lim (F (z + n) − F (1 + n)) = 0

(2.49)

n→∞

is a necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of the (telescop P∞ 1 1 ing) series k=0 1+k − z+k . Since Z ∞ −t e − e−zt −nt e dt, F (z + n) − F (1 + n) = 1 − e−t 0 (2.49) follows on account of Exercise 2.9. It follows from (2.48) and (2.49) that F (z) = −γ +

∞ X

k=0

1 1 − 1+k z+k

,

which is the same as the Gaussian representation for ψ (cf. (5.17)), whence (2.42) follows. Exercise 2.11

Prove Legendre’s (integral) representation Z 1 1 − xz−1 ψ(z) + γ = dx, Re z > 0. 1−x 0

(2.50)

March 27, 2007

17:14


46

vista


Use (2.50) to deduce π = sin πz

Z

∞ 0

u−z du = 1+u

Z

∞ 0

v z−1 dv, 1+v

(2.51)

and π = cos πz

Z

∞ 0

1

uz− 2 du = 2 1+u

Z

∞

0

1 1 t2z dt, − < Re z < 2 1+t 2 2

(2.52)

(cf. Corollary A.4). Solution (2.50) follows from (2.42) by the change of variable t = − log x. Using (2.50), we have Z 1 −1 Z ∞ −1 x 2 − xz−1 t 2 − t−z 1 = dx = − dt, Re z > 0, ψ(z) − ψ 2 1−x 1−t 0 1 (2.53) where the second expression follows from the first by the change of variable x = t−1 . Similarly, Z 1 −1 Z ∞ −1 1 x 2 − xz−1 t 2 − t−z ψ(1 − z) − ψ dt = − dx, Re z < 1. = 2 1−t 1−x 1 0 (2.54) Subtraction of (2.54) from (2.53) gives ψ(z)−ψ(1−z) = −

Z

∞ − 21

t

0

− t−z dt = 1−t

Z

∞ 0

1

x− 2 − xz−1 dx, 0 < Re z < 1. 1−x

If we admit the relation ψ(z) = (log Γ(z))0 , then from (2.15), we deduce that ψ(z) − ψ(1 − z) = −π cot πz,

(2.55)

an important relation linking the digamma and the trigonometric functions. Use this to write the above equality as π cot πz =

Z

∞ − 21 −t−z

t

0

1−t

dt = −

Z

∞ 0

which becomes, on writing t = u2 , x = v 2 , z ↔ π π cot z = 2 2

Z

∞ 0

1 − u1−z du = − 1 − u2

Z

0

∞

1

x− 2 − xz−1 dx, 1−x z : 2

1 − v z−1 dv, 0 < Re z < 2 (2.56) 1−v

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

47

and π π tan z = − 2 2

Z

∞ 0

1 − u1−z du = 1 − u2

Z

∞ 0

1 − v z−1 dv, −1 < Re z < 1, 1 − v2 (2.57)

by the interchange of z by 1 − z. Adding (2.56) and (2.57), we deduce (2.51), whence (2.52) follows by 1 changing z by − z. This completes the proof. 2 We are now in a position to prove the following remarkable result of Gauss (cf. Theorems 8.1 and 8.2): Theorem 2.2 ψ

For integers 1 ≤ p < q, we have

q−1 X π 2pk p k p = −γ − log q − cot π + cos log 2 sin π. q 2 q q q a=1

(2.58)

Proof. We make the change of variable x = uk in Legendre’s formula p (2.50) with z = to obtain q Z 1 p +γ = f (u) du, ψ q 0

(2.59)

where up−1 − uq−1 . uq − 1

f (u) = q

(2.60)

1

Let ε = e2πi q be the first primitive q-th root of 1. Then the denominator decomposes into (u − 1)

q−1 Y l=1

u − εl ,

and the factor u − 1 cancels that of the denominator. Hence the partial fraction expansion for f (u) is of the form f (u) =

q−1 X

k=1

Ak , u − εk

March 27, 2007

17:14


48

vista


and Ak = lim (u − εk )f (u) u→εk k p−1

=q

(ε ) − (εk )q−1 = q−1 Q k l (ε − ε ) l=0,l6=k

=

εk

l=0,l6=k

εpk − 1 = εpk − 1, (εq )k q q

εpk − 1

qε−k q−1 Q

q−1 Q

l=0,l6=k

(1 − εl−k )

where we used the identity q−1 Y l=1

1 − εl = q,

(2.61)

which follows from the decomposition q−1 Y l=1

u − εl = uq−1 + · · · + 1.

(2.62)

Hence ψ

Z q−1 X 1 1 p +γ = εpk − 1 du q 0 u − εk k=1

or

q−1 X 1 − εk p εpk − 1 log . +γ = ψ q −εk

(2.63)

k=1

Noting that q−1 Q

(1 − εk ) 1 − εk q k=1 log = log q−1 = log q, = log q q−1 k −ε Q 2 −ε k k=1 (−ε ) q−1 X

k=1

we may rewrite (2.63) as

q−1 X 2i sin 2π p q k +γ = εpk log ψ − log q, k q ε2 k=1

(2.64)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

49


which becomes for q − p in place of p: q−1 X 2i sin 2π p q k − log q. εpk log ψ 1− +γ = k q ε2

(2.65)

k=1

Adding and subtracting (2.64) and (2.65), we deduce that q−1 X p p 2πp 2π ψ +ψ 1− + 2γ = 2 cos k log sin k − 2 log q q q q q

(2.66)

k=1

and X q−1 p k 2πp p +ψ 1− = , k −πi 2i sin ψ q q q q k=1

or

q−1 p p 2πp p 2π X π cot π = ψ k. k sin −ψ 1− = q q q q q

(2.67)

k=1

Hence adding (2.66) and (2.67), we obtain q−1 X p 2πp 2π p 2ψ cos + 2γ = 2 k log sin k − 2 log q − π cot π , q q q q k=1

whence (2.58) follows, and the proof is complete.

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Chapter 3

The theory of the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta-functions

Abstract In this chapter we shall give various contributions to the theory of the Hurwitz zeta-function. In §3.2 we shall give integral representations (for the derivatives as well) which give a basis for the theory of the gamma and related functions to be developed in Chapter 5. In §3.3 we shall give a proof of a formula of Ramanujan whose prototype (α = 1) was first stated by Ramanujan and elaborated in [KKaY] In §3.4 we shall give two more proofs of the closed formula for the integral of the psi-function, thus recovering the recent result of Espinosa and Moll. Finally, in §3.5 we shall give another proof of the functional equation.

3.1

Introduction

We shall consider the partial sum defined by (3.5) of the Hurwitz zetafunction defined by (3.1) and prove the integral representation which turns out to hold true for ζ itself. The proof as presented here is quite simple, but the result is far-reaching and we may even base the whole theory of the gamma and related functions on our results (Theorem 3.1 and its corollaries). We shall develop this aspect of our theory in Chapter 5. The special feature of Theorem 3.1 is that the derivatives may be computed by differentiating with respect to u and the whole results may be inherited (for more details, cf. the introductory remark at the beginning of §3.2). In §3.3, we are going to give the sixth proof of the far-reaching formula 51

vista

March 27, 2007

52

17:14



Fig. 3.1

Riemann

of Ramanujan. This proof, incorporating the structure of the Hurwitz zetafunction as the principal solution of the difference equation, seems one of the most natural ones. We give only a simple example. For more summation formulas going far beyond those in [SC] cf. e.g. [KTTY3]. InR §3.4, we shall give two more proofs of the closed formula for the intez gral 0 tλ ψ(t+a) dt, thus recovering the seemingly most important formula of Espinosa and Moll [EM1]. We also give two enlightening remarks, the latter of which speaks out the relation between Espinosa and Moll’s results and Mikol´ as’ results. In §3.5, we shall sum up the existing proofs of the functional equation (3.67) for the Hurwitz (Lerch) zeta-function and reveal the hierarchical relationship among them, referring to Laurinˇcikas and Garunkˇstis [LG] for the Lerch zeta-function aspects. We shall add one more proof of (3.67) based on the Dirac delta-function. Since from the delta-function, we may

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

53

deduce the Poisson summation formula, we might regard our proof more fundamental. Thus, we put the existing literature on the Hurwitz zeta-function in their hierarchical and historical perspective, with our recent contributions [KKaY], [KKSY], [KTTY3] as touchstones. We define the Hurwitz zeta-function and its special case, the Riemann zeta-function, by Dirichlet series absolutely convergent for σ > 1 in the first instance. Both are meromorphically continued over the whole plane with a simple pole at s = 1 as we shall see below. ζ(s, a) =

∞ X

1 , (n + a)s n=0

ζ(s) = ζ(s, 1) =

Re s = σ > 1,

∞ X 1 , ns n=1

a>0

σ>1

(3.1)

(3.2)

We define the counterpart of the Hurwitz zeta-function, the Lerch zetafunction or the polylogarithm function by (cf. Proposition B.1) ls (a) =

∞ X e2πina , ns n=1

σ > 1,

a ∈ R (or s = 1, 0 < a < 1)

(3.3)

We note that ζ(s, a) satisfies the DE ζ(s, a + 1) − ζ(s, a) = a−s . We shall use the following notation. Z ∞ e−t ts−1 dt, Γ(s) =

(3.4)

σ>0

0

– the gamma function; Z γ(s, a) =

a

−t s−1

e t

0

dt,

Γ(s, a) =

Z

∞

e−t ts−1 dt

a

– the incomplete gamma functions of the 1st and the 2nd kind (cf. (3.53), (3.66)), which satisfy γ(s, a) + Γ(s, a) = Γ(s); ψ(s) =

Γ0 (s) d = log Γ(s) Γ(s) ds

March 27, 2007

17:14


54

vista


– the Euler digamma function or the psi function; Hn = ψ(n + 1) − ψ(1) = ψ(n + 1) + γ =

n X 1 k

k=1

– the n-th harmonic number, where γ signifies Euler’s constant defined by (5.16) (see below as the Laurent constant γ0 (1) = −ψ(1) = γ). n X n Bn (z) = Bk z n−k k k=0

– the n-th Bernoulli polynomial with Bk the k-th Bernoulli number defined through ∞

X Bk z = zk z e −1 k!

|z| < 2π

k=0

B n (z) = Bn ({z}) = Bn (z − [z]) for z ∈ R – the n-th periodic Bernoulli polynomial, with [x] and {x} signifying the integral and fractional parts of x, respectively. We use the following as known: Bm (z) = −m ζ(1 − m, z),

m ∈ N,

ψ (m) (z) = (−1)m+1 m! ζ(m + 1, z),

(cf. (4.1))

m ∈ N,

(cf. (5.17)).

The Laurent expansion of ζ(s, a) at s = 1 is given by (cf. Corollary 3.3) ζ(s, a) =

∞ X 1 (−1)n γn (a) − ψ(a) + (s − 1)n , s−1 n! n=1

s → 1.

The addition formula for the Bernoulli polynomial ((A)) n X n Bn (x + y) = Bk (x) y n−k . k k=0

3.2

Integral representations

For complex variables u and a and x ≥ 0 let X Lu (x, a) = (n + a)u , 0≤n≤x

(3.5)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

55

denote the partial sum of the Hurwitz zeta-function, where for negative values of u, the possible value of n for which n + a = 0 is to be excluded. We shall use the Euler-Maclaurin sum formula (Theorem B.5, i.e. under Appell’s (D0 )) to prove an integral representation for Lu (x, a), which has ∂k the following far-reaching features shared by the derivatives ∂u k Lu (x, a) as well, i.e. all statements about the function in u (Lu (x, a) and ζ(−u, a)) are valid for their derivatives as well in the form of (i) below. (i) It gives an analytic expression for Lu (x, a), which entails an integral P k ∂k u representation for each derivative ∂u k Lu (x, a) = 0≤n≤x (n+a) log (n+a) (the differentiation of the integral being carried out under the integral sign). (ii) It gives an asymptotic formula for Lu (x, a) in x by estimating the integral trivially, which is feasible for applications in the divisor problems. (iii) It gives a generic definition of ζ(−u, a) for u 6= −1 (and for γ0 (a) := −ψ(a) for u = −1). (iv) It gives an integral representation for the associated Hurwitz zeta∂k (k) (−u, a)) for u 6= function ζ(−u, a) (and its derivatives ∂u k ζ(−u, a) = ζ −1, and for u = −1, it gives an analytic expression for the generalized Euler constant γk (a) (the k-th Laurent coefficient of ζ(s, a) at s = 1), which follows by simply putting x = 0 in the integral representation. (v) The integral representation for ζ(s, a) (or γk (a)) in (iii) yields an asymptotic formula for the ζ(s, a + z) in z with Bernoulli polynomial coefficients (Theorem 2 [Kat1]) as given by Theorem 5.2 below. Γ(u+1) Convention. We sometime use (ur ) r! and Γ(u+1−r) interchangeably, where the former is suited for easier calculation and the latter for expected differentiation with respect to u.

Theorem 3.1 (Integral Representations) For any l ∈ N with l > Re u + 1 and for any x ≥ 0, we have the integral representation

Lu (x, a) =

l X

Γ(u + 1) (−1)r B r (x) (x + a)u−r+1 Γ(u + 2 − r) r! r=1 Z ∞ (−1)l Γ(u + 1) + B l (t) (t + a)u−l dt l! Γ(u + 1 − l) x   1 (x + a)u+1 + ζ(−u, a), u 6= −1, + u+1 log(x + a) − ψ(a), u = −1.

(3.6)

March 27, 2007

17:14


56

vista


Also the asymptotic formula Lu (x, a) =

l X u (−1)r B r (x)(x + a)u−r+1 + O xRe (u)−l r−1 r r=1   1 (x + a)u+1 + ζ(−u, a), u 6= −1 + u+1 log(x + a) − ψ(a), u = −1

(3.7)

holds true as x → ∞. Furthermore, the integral representation

l X 1 (−1)r u u+1 ζ(−u, a) = a − a − Br au−r+1 u+1 r r − 1 r=1 Z ∞ l+1 u B l (t)(t + a)u−l dt, + (−1) l 0 u

(3.8)

which follows from (3.6) by putting x = 0, holds true for all complex u 6= −1, where l can be any natural number subject only to the condition that l > Re u + 1. Proof.

Since the r-th derivative of f (t) = (t + a)u is u Γ(u + 1) f (r) (t) = (t + a)u−r , r! (t + a)u−r = Γ(u + 1 − r) r

we see that the terms in the Euler-Maclaurin sum formula (Theorem B.5) with a = 0 become  Z x Z x  1 (x + a)u+1 − 1 au+1 , u 6= −1 u+1 f (t) dt = (t + a)u dt = u + 1 log(x + a) − log(a), 0 0 u = −1, l o X (−1)r n Br (x)f (r−1) (x) − Br (0)f (r−1) (0) r! r=1

=

l X r=1

Γ(u + 1) (−1)r Br (x)(x + a)u−r+1 − Br au−r+1 , Γ(u + 2 − r) r!

and (−1)l+1 l!

Z

x

Bl (t)f 0

(l)

(−1)l+1 Γ(u + 1) (t) dt = l! Γ(u + 1 − l)

Z

x 0

Bl (t)(t + a)u−l dt,

March 27, 2007

17:14



respectively. Hence writing Lu (x, a) = au +

P

vista

57

(n + a)u , we obtain

0 Re u + 1, we have by integration by parts, Z

∞ x

Bl (t) (t + a)u−l dt

∞ Z u−l ∞ Bl+1 (t) (t + a)u−l − Bl+1 (t)(t + a)u−l−1 dt l+1 l + 1 x Z ∞x Re u−l u−l−1 =O x +O (t + a) dt = O xRe u−l ,

=

x

whence it follows that Z

x

Bl (t)(t + a)

u−l

dt =

0

=

Z

Z

∞ 0

0

∞

Bl (t)(t + a)

u−l

dt −

Z

∞

Bl (t)(t + a)u−l dt

x

Bl (t)(t + a)u−l dt + O xRe u−l .

Hence we may replace the integral in (3.9) by

R∞ 0

Bl (t)(t + a)u−l dt +

March 27, 2007

17:14


58

vista


O xRe u−l to obtain   1 (x + a)u+1 − 1 au+1 , u 6= −1 u u+1 Lu (x, a) = a + u + 1 log(x + a) − log a, u = −1 +

l X r=1

Γ(u + 1) (−1)r Br (x) (x + a)u−r+1 Γ(u + 2 − r) r!

l X

Γ(u + 1) (−1)r Br au−r+1 Γ(u + 2 − r) r! r=1 Z ∞ (−1)l+1 Γ(u + 1) Bl (t) (t + a)u−l dt + O xRe u−l . + l! Γ(u + 1 − l) 0 (3.10) −

Now for Re u < −1 we let x → ∞ to obtain for any l ∈ N, l X 1 Γ(u + 1) (−1)r au+1 − Br au−r+1 u+1 Γ(u + 2 − r) r! r=1 Z ∞ l (−1) Γ(u + 1) Bl (t) (t + a)u−l dt, + l! Γ(u + 1 − l) x

ζ(−u, a) = au −

(3.11)

which is (3.8). Now for any u 6= −1, take l ∈ N such that l > Re u + 1. Then the last integral in (3.11) is absolutely convergent for Re u < l − 1 and represents an analytic function in Re u < l − 1. Substituting (3.11) in (3.10), we deduce (3.6) for u 6= −1. In the case u = −1, the Euler-Maclaurin sum formula on the same lines as above (cf. the proof of (5.39)) gives rise to Z ∞ −1 B l (t) (t + a)−1−l dt L−1 (x, a) = (−1)l+1 l 0 l X −1 1 (−1)r Br a−r − r − 1 r r=1 l X (3.12) −1 1 + (−1)r B r (x) (x + a)−r r−1 r r=1 Z ∞ l −1 + (−1) B l (t) (t + a)−1−l dt l x + a−1 + log(x + a) − log a.

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

59


Now for x large and l = 1, we obtain, from (3.12) X 1 − log(x + a) = f (a) + O x−1 , n+a

(3.13)

0≤n≤x

where f (a) is a function in a only. If we adopt the definition (5.18) of ψ(a), then we must have f (a) = −ψ(a). Noting that from (3.12) with x → ∞ f (a) = − log a + a

−1

+

l X Br r=1

r

a

−r

−

Z

∞

B l (t) (t + a)−1−l dt,

0

we have the integral representation for the digamma function Z ∞ l 1 −1 X Br −r a + B l (t) (t + a)−1−l dt. ψ(a) = log a − a + 2 r 0 r=2

(3.14)

Substituting the constant term −ψ(a) in (3.12), we have the integral representation for the partial sum. Since the integrals appearing in Theorem 3.1 are analytic in the region Re u < 1 − l, we may differentiate (3.6) and (3.8) in u there. We state the counterpart of (3.7) as the following corollaries (the counterpart of (3.8) to be read off from them by putting x = 0). Corollary 3.1

For any complex u and a > 0, X d Lu (x, a) = (n + a)u log(n + a) du

(3.15)

0≤n≤x

=

l X (−1)r r=1

r!

B r (x)(x + a)u−r+1

Γ(u + 1) × {ψ(u + 1) − ψ(u + 2 − r) + log(x + a)} Γ(u + 2 − r) Z (−1)l ∞ B l (t)(t + a)u−l + l! x Γ(u + 1) {ψ(u + 1) − ψ(u + 1 − l) + log(t + a)} dt × Γ(u + 1 − l)  1 1 u+1 u+1  (x + a) log (x + a) −   2 (x + a) u+1 (u + 1) + −ζ 0 (−u, a) , u 6= −1     1 {log (x + a)} 2 + γ (a) , u = −1. 1 2

March 27, 2007

17:14

60



Corollary 3.2

For any complex u and a > 0,

d2 Lu (x, a) (3.16) du2 l X (−1)r B r (x)(x + a)u−r+1 = r! r=1 2 Γ(u + 1) h ψ(u + 1) − ψ(u + 2 − r) + log(x + a) × Γ(u + 2 − r) i + ψ 0 (u + 1) − ψ 0 (u + 2 − r) Z (−1)l ∞ B l (t)(t + a)u−l + l! x 2 Γ(u + 1) h × ψ(u + 1) − ψ(u + 1 − l) + log(t + a) Γ(u + 1 − l) i + ψ 0 (u + 1) − ψ 0 (u + 1 − l) dt  u+1 (x + a) 2(x + a)u+1   {log(x + a)}2 − log (x + a)    (u + 1)2  u+1 2(x + a)u+1 + + + ζ 00 (−u, a), u 6= −1   (u + 1)3    1  {log(x + a)}3 + γ (a), u = −1. 2 3 We note that Theorem 3.1 [(3.6), (3.7)] is first obtained by Mellin [Me] by means of the integral transform under his name (§7.4) and is the most ∂ informative for Lu (x, a), so are Corollaries 3.1 and 3.2 for ∂u Lu (x, a) and ∂2 ∂u2 Lu (x, a), respectively. Formula (3.6) with l = 1, u 6= −1, Re u < 0 appears as a prototype of the “approximate functional equation” in Landau [Lan, 9–10]. Mikola´s [M1] used it with x = 1 to obtain (3.8) with l = 1. Then he proceeds to deduce (3.8) with l = 2 by integration by parts. Γ(u+1) Care should be taken in interpreting the coefficients like Γ(u+1−l) (ψ(u + 1) − ψ(u + 1 − l)) when u is a negative integer; it is to be taken as one without singularities (e.g. in deducing (5.20)). Corollary 3.3 The k-th Laurent coefficient of the Hurwitz zeta-function k (at s = 1) is given by (−1) k! γk (a), where   X logk (n + a) logk+1 (x + a)  − (3.17) γk (a) = lim  x→∞ n+a k+1 0≤n≤x

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

61

and γk (a) admits the integral representation γk (a) =

1 1 logk a − logk+1 a 2a k+1 Z ∞ B 1 (t) k k+1 − log (t + a) − k log (t + a) dt. (t + a)2 0

(3.18)

In particular, γ0 (a) = −ψ(a). Proof. The following is the simplest possible method known. The starting point is Theorem 3.1 with l = 1 and −s (s 6= 1, σ > 0) for u: Z ∞ (x + a)1−s B 1 (x) B 1 (t) L−s (x, a) = + ζ(s, a) − +s dt. (3.19) 1−s (x + a)s (t + a)s+1 x Since both sides of (3.19) are analytic in σ > 0, we may compute the k-th Taylor coefficient around s = 1. The k-th Taylor coefficient of the left-hand side is 1 ∂k (−1)k X (n + a)−1 logk (n + a) L−s (x, a)|s=1 = k k! ∂s k!

(3.20)

0≤n≤x

and that of the right-hand side is (−1)k k!

logk+1 (x + a) B 1 (x) + γk (a) − logk (x + a) k+1 x+a Z ∞ B 1 (t) k k−1 + log (t + a) − k log (t + a) dt ; (t + a)2 x

(3.21)

equating (3.20) and (3.21), we conclude that X γk (a) = (n + a)−1 logk (n + a) 0≤n≤x

logk+1 (x + a) B 1 (x) + logk (x + a) k+1 x+a Z ∞ B 1 (t) k k−1 − log (t + a) − k log (t + a) dt. (t + a)2 x

−

(3.22)

We now note that (3.22), being valid for any x ≥ 0, implies both (3.17) and (3.18) by letting x → ∞ and x = 0 respectively, (cf. Berndt [Ber3]). In the case k = 0, we note that (3.13) and (3.14) correspond to (3.17) and (3.18), respectively.

March 27, 2007

17:14

62

3.3


vista


A formula of Ramanujan

In this section we are going to give the sixth proof of the fundamental summation formula based on the use of finite differences, which has been applied successfully in recent researches [KKY3], [KKY2]. Theorem 3.2 (Ramanujan)

For 0 ≤ λ ∈ Z and |z| < |α| we have

∞ λ X X ζ(m, α) m+λ λ 0 z = ζ (−k, α − z) z λ−k m + λ k m=2 k=0

− ζ 0 (−λ, α) −

λ X 1 ζ(k − λ, α) z k k

(3.23)

k=1

1 + (ψ(α) − Hλ ) z λ+1 . λ+1

Proof. Let ∆α f (α) = f (α + 1) − f (α) be the difference operator (introduced in (DE) in Chapter 1). We apply this to the sum S on the LHS of (3.23) to obtain ∆α S = ∆ α

∞ ∞ ∞ X X X α−m m+λ 1 z m ζ(m, α) m+λ . z =− z = −αλ m+λ m+λ m α m=2 m=2 m=λ+2

The resulting infinite series is nothing but

or

λ+1 z X 1 z m − log 1 − − , α m α m=1

1 z m − log(α − z) − log α + m α m=1 λ+1 X

!

,

whence ∆α S = αλ log(α − z) − αλ log α +

λ+1 X

αλ−m m z . m m=1

(3.24)

Rewriting the first term on the RHS of (3.24) in the form Pλ λ λ−k (α − z)k log(α − z) and telescoping (3.24), thereby noting k=0 k z that ζ 0 (s, α + 1) − ζ 0 (s, α) = α−s log α,

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

63


we get

S=

λ X λ

k=0

k

ζ 0 (−k, α − z) z λ−k − ζ 0 (−λ, α)

λ X ψ(α) λ+1 1 ζ(k − λ, α) z k + z + f (z, α), − k λ+1

(3.25)

k=1

where f (z, α) is the function satisfying the conditions ∆α f (z, α) = 0

(3.26)

f (0, α) = 0.

(3.27)

and

Hλ λ+1 It remains to determine f (z, α) (to be − λ+1 z ). First note that

∂ ∂ d 0 ζ (−k, α − z) = ζ(s, α − z) |s=−k dz ∂s ∂z ∂ s ζ(s + 1, α − z) |s=−k = ∂s ( ζ(1 − k, α − z) − k ζ 0 (1 − k, α − z), k ∈ N = −ψ(α − z), k = 0. With this in mind, we differentiate (3.25) with respect to z to obtain λ−1 X λ ∂ S= (λ − k) ζ 0 (−k, α − z) z λ−k−1 (3.28) ∂z k k=0 λ λ X X λ λ 0 + ζ(1 − k, α − z) z λ−k − ζ (1 − k, α − z) z λ−k k k k=1

− ψ(α − z) z λ −

k=1

λ X k=1

ζ(k − λ, α) z k−1 + ψ(α) z −λ +

∂ f (z, α). ∂z

We note that the two sums on the RHS of (3.28) containing ζ 0 cancel each other, while the second sum, say S2 , becomes, in view of the addition

March 27, 2007

17:14


64

vista


formula, λ X λ 1

Bk (α − z)z λ−k (3.29) k k k=1 k λ λ−k X λ λ−k X X k λ z λ z =− (−z)k Bl (α) (−z)k−l − k k l k k

S2 = −

l=1

k=1

k=1

= S2,1 + S2,2 ,

say. Using (1.14) and changing the order of summation in S2,1 , we have S2,1 = −

λ X λ

l

l=1

Bl (α) z λ−l

λ−l X λ − l (−1)k k=0

k+l

k

.

Invoking the formula K X K (−1)k k=0

k+l

k

=

K! Γ(l) , Γ(l + K + 1)

we deduce that S2,1 = −

λ X Bl (α) l=1

l

z λ−l =

λ X

ζ(1−l, α) z λ−l =

l=1

λ X

ζ(l−λ, α) z l−1 . (3.30)

l=1

For S2,2 , we use another formula λ X λ (−1)k k=1

k

k

= Hλ

to obtain S2,2 = Hλ z λ .

(3.31)

From (3.29), (3.30) and (3.31) it follows that S2 =

λ X l=1

ζ(l − λ, α) z l−1 + Hλ z λ .

(3.32)

Substituting (3.32) in (3.28), we conclude that ∂ ∂ S = −ψ(α − z) z λ + ψ(α) z λ + Hλ z λ + f (z, α). ∂z ∂z

(3.33)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

65


On the other hand, from (3.25) we know that ∂ S = − (ψ(α − z) − ψ(α)) z λ . ∂z

(3.34)

Hence, comparing (3.33) and (3.34), we obtain ∂ f (z, α) = −Hλ z λ , ∂z whence f (z, α) = −

Hλ λ+1 z + C. λ+1

By condition (3.27), C = 0, and f (z, α) = −

Hλ λ+1 z . λ+1

(3.35)

Substitution of (3.35) into (3.25) completes the proof.

There are enormous amount of formula (e.g. in [SC], where one third is devoted to the statement of such formulas) which are consequences of Theorem 3.2 (cf. [KKY1], [KKY3] and [KTTY3]). We give only a simple example. Example 3.1

The formula

log Γ(a + 1) 2k ∞ X √ 1 ζ(2k, a + 1) 1 1 1 = a+ log a + + a + − log 2π − 2 2 2 2k(2k + 1) 2 k=1

is first stated by Wilton [Wil1, Eq.(4)] and is a rather special case of Theorem 3.2. As an asymptotic formula in a, this gives the Stirling formula and is a special case of Corollary 5.1. 3.4

Some definite integrals

We shall give two proofs of [EM2], Theorem 4.3, which seems the highest summit of the paper, and coincides with our Corollary 3 (i) [KKY3]; the first proof depends on a modified form of Theorem 3.2, which we state as Lemma 3.1 while the second depends on a more antecedent one, i.e. the intermediate formula toward the proof of Proposition 1 [KKaY, p.10], which we state as Lemma 3.2.

March 27, 2007

17:14


66

vista


Theorem 3.3 ([KKY3, Corollary 3 (i)]=[EM2, Theorem 4.3]) λ ∈ N ∪ {0}, we have Z

z 0

=

For

tλ ψ(t + a) dt

Bk+1 (a + z) (−1)k z λ−k ζ 0 (−k, a + z) − Hk k+1 k k=0 Bλ+1 (a + z) . − (−1)λ ζ 0 (−λ, a) − Hλ k+1 λ X λ

(3.36)

(3.36) should be compared with our previous result ([KKY3, Corollary 3]): (i) For λ ∈ N ∪ {0} and |z| < α, Z

z

tλ ψ(α + t) dt

0

= (−1)λ

λ X

Cλ (r, α) log Γr+1 (α + z)/Γr+1 (α)

r=0

+ (−1)

λ

λ X l=1

λ Bλ−l+1 (α) z λ+1 0 (−1) ζ (l − λ) + zl + Hλ . l l(λ − l + 1) λ+1 l

(ii) For λ ∈ N

λ

Z

z

tλ−1 log Γ(α + t) dt 0

= z λ log Γ(α + z) − (−1)λ − (−1)λ

λ X l=1

(−1)l

λ X

Cλ (r, α) log Γr+1 (α + z)/Γr+1 (α)

r=0

z λ+1 λ Bλ−l+1 (α) Hλ , zl − ζ 0 (l − λ) + l(λ − l + 1) λ+1 l

where Γr (a) signifies the multiple gamma function [SC, p.39].

March 27, 2007

17:14



Lemma 3.1 ([KKaY], (9))

vista

67

We have

∞ X ζ(m, α) m+λ z m+λ m=2 λ X λ = {ζ 0 (−k, α − z) + Hk ζ(−k, α − z)} z λ−k k

(3.37)

k=0

− (ζ 0 (−λ, α) + Hλ ζ(−λ, α)) +

ψ(α) λ+1 z . λ+1

Proof. (First proof of Theorem 3.3) We start from the Taylor expansion (|z| < α) ∞ ∞ X X ψ (n) (α) n z = ψ(α) + (−1)m ζ(m, α) z m−1 . n! m=2 n=0

ψ(z + α) =

(3.38)

Multiplying both sides of (3.38) by z λ and integrating over [0, z] with respect to z, we deduce that Z

z 0

=

uλ ψ(α + u) du

Z

z

uλ ψ(α) du + 0

(3.39) ∞ X

(−1)m ζ(m, α)

m=2

Z

z

uλ+m−1 du 0

∞ X z λ+1 ζ(m, α) (−z)m+λ + ψ(α). = (−1)λ m+λ λ+1 m=2

Substituting (3.37) with −z in place of z into (3.39), we obtain Z

z

uλ ψ(α + u) du 0

= (−1)

λ

λ X λ k=0

k

{ζ 0 (−k, α + z) + Hk ζ(−k, α + z)} (−z)λ−k

(3.40)

ψ(α) ψ(α) λ+1 (−1)λ (−z)λ+1 + z λ+1 λ+1 − (−1)λ (ζ 0 (−λ, α) + Hλ ζ(−λ, α)) ,

+

which is (3.36).

March 27, 2007

17:14


68

vista


Lemma 3.2 (−1)λ+1 =

1 s−1 −

Z

For 0 ≤ λ ∈ Z we have z

uλ ζ(s, a + u) du

0 λ X k=0

λ Γ(2 − s) k! ζ(s − k − 1, a + z) (−z)λ−k k Γ(k + 2 − s)

1 λ! Γ(2 − s) ζ(s − λ − 1, a). s − 1 Γ(λ − 2 − s)

Proof. (Second proof of Theorem 3.3) Subtracting λ+1

(−1) s−1

the left-side, and (−1)

λ+1

Z

z

u 0

λ

λ+1

z λ+1

(−1)λ+1 s−1

Rz 0

(3.41)

uλ du from

from the right-side, of (3.41), we deduce that

1 ζ(s, a + u) − s−1

du =

1 F (s), s−1

(3.42)

where λ X λ Γ(2 − s) k! ζ(s − k − 1, a + z) (−z)λ−k F (s) = k Γ(k + 2 − s) k=0

Γ(2 − s) (−z)λ+1 − λ! ζ(s − λ − 1, a) − . Γ(λ + 2 − s) λ+1

(3.43)

We are to take the limit of (3.42) as s → 1. For this we first contend that F (1) = 0. Indeed, F (1) = − Rewriting that

λ X λ Bk+1 (a + z) k=0

λ 1 k k+1

F (1) = −

k+1

k

as

λ+1 1 λ+1 k+1

(−z)λ−k +

Bλ+1 (a) (−z)λ+1 − . λ+1 λ+1

(3.44)

and writing k for k+1, we derive from (3.44)

λ+1 1 X λ+1 Bλ+1 (a) Bk (a + z) (−z)λ+1−k + , λ+1 k λ+1

(3.45)

k=0

where we incorporated the last term in (3.39) in the first sum of (3.45). Noting that the fist sum of (3.45) is nothing but the expansion of the Bernoulli polynomial Bλ+1 (a + z − z) = Bλ+1 (a), we conclude F (1) = 0. Hence, we R z may take the limit as s → 1 of (3.37). On the left side we have (−1)λ 0 uλ ψ(a + u) du by the Laurent expansion of ζ(s, a + u), and on the right-side we just differentiate F (s) with respect to s, thereby noting

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

69


the formula 0 Γ(2 − s) Γ(k + 1 − s)

s=1 Γ(2 − s) 1 = = (−ψ(2 − s) + ψ(k + 2 − s)) Hk , Γ(k + 2 − s) k! s=1

(3.46)

to obtain

F 0 (1) =

λ X λ

k=0

k

{ζ 0 (−k, a + z) + Hk ζ(−k, a + z)} (−z)λ−k

(3.47)

− {ζ 0 (−λ, a) + Hλ ζ(−λ, a)} , Rz which is equal to (−1)λ 0 uλ ψ(a + u) du. By multiplying by (−1)λ completes the proof. Remark 3.1

In the notation of [EM2, (3.1), (3.28)], 1 ((k + 1)ζ 0 (−k, q) − Hk Bk+1 (q)) k+1 = (k + 1)! ψ (−k−1) (q),

ζ 0 (−k, q) + Hk ζ(−k, q) =

and our Theorem 3.3 coincides with Theorem 4.3 of Espinosa and Moll. Remark 3.2 form

(i) Espinosa and Moll [EM1] developed the Hurwitz transZ

1

f (u)ζ(s, u) du 0

and deduced several results for special types of f (u) which can be expanded into Fourier series as consequences of their Theorem 2.2, which in turn is a consequence of the “Fourier series”: ζ(s, u) = 2 Γ(1 − s)

πs , (2πn)s−1 sin 2πnu + 2 n=1 ∞ X

(3.48)

or, more commonly known as the Hurwitz formula (cf. (5.56)). We note that Mikol´ as’ [M3] gave the simplest proof of (3.48) as the Fourier series, whereby he computed the Fourier coefficients Z 1 Γ(1 − s) ζ(s, u) e−2πiνu du = , (3.49) 1−s (2πiν) 0

March 27, 2007

70

17:14



0 < s < 1, 0 6= ν ∈ / Z. From (3.49) we immediately deduce Z 1 Z 1 ζ(s, u) cos(2πνu) du − i ζ(s, u) sin(2πνu) du 0 0 Z 1 1 1 (2π)s ν s−1 −2πiνu , −i ζ(s, u) e du = = 4Γ(s) cos π2 s sin π2 s 0 whence follows Formulas (2.2) and (2.3) of Espinosa and Moll. (ii) Espinosa and Moll [EM1] refer to Mikol´ as’ paper [M2] and quote the result s Z 1 ζ(2s) (a, b) 2 ζ(1 − s, {aq}) ζ(1 − s, {bq}) dq = 2 Γ (s) (2π)2s [a, b] 0 ((a, b) = g.c.d. of a and b, and [a, b] = l.c.m.) for Re (1 − s) < 12 . We note that Mikol´ as [M1] obtained the result on the basis of Fourier analysis (the Parseval formula): Z 1 ζ(s, u) ζ(s0 , u) du 0 π 0 (s − s0 ) ζ(2 − s − s0 ) = 2 (2π)s+s −2 Γ(1 − s) Γ(1 − s0 ) cos 2

for max{0, Re s} + max{0, Re s0 } < 1; the region of validity wider than that of Espinosa and Moll who have s < 0, s0 < 0. This result of Mikol´ as’, combined with our recent developments of the product of zeta-functions [KTY1], may shed some new light on the asymptotic formula for mean square of zeta-functions. In fact, it looks like the region is one of the excluded one in Katsurada [Kat] and Katsurada and Matsumoto [KM]. For recent developments, cf. [Hashimoto] and [KTZ2]. 3.5

The functional equation

In [KKSY] statements were made about the proof of the functional equation, or the Hurwitz formula (3.48), for the Hurwitz zeta-function, using the absolutely convergent Fourier series for B 2 (t) rather than the boundedly convergent Fourier series for B 1 (t). Meanwhile the book of Laurinˇcikas and Garunkˇstis [LG] has appeared which has rich contents about rather wide P∞ e2πinξ spectrum of the theory of the Lerch zeta-function φ(ξ, a, s) = n=0 (n+a) s (cf. (8.21)), and we can do no better than referring to it regarding various

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

71

proofs of the functional equation for φ. We shall therefore review mostly those papers which were not quoted in [LG]. As mentioned in Remark 3.2, Mikol´ as [M3] made use of the Fourier series to deduce the functional equation for ζ(s, a) and in the subsequent paper [M4], he applied the same method to prove the functional equation for φ(ξ, a, s). Berndt [Ber3] used the boundedly convergent Fourier series to deduce (3.48), which he further applied to φ(ξ, a, s) to deduce the functional equation in [Ber4], where he gave another proof for it, which was reproduced by [LG]. Fine [Fine] applied Riemann’s second method, i.e. the thetatransformation formula (for θ3 ), or what amounts to the same thing, the Poisson summation formula, to prove (3.48), while Apostol [Ap1] deduced (3.48) from the functional equation and the distribution property for φ(ξ, a, s). Apostol’s paper [Ap2] (cf. also [Ap3]) contains the seemingly most natural proof of the functional equation for φ(ξ, a, s) based on the transformation formula and the difference equational structure of φ. As has been developed rather fully in [KTY7], the theta-transformation formula or the modular relation a l´ a Bochner and the functional equation are equivalent. In this respect, Fine and Apostol would lead to Bochner and may be considered as the prototype of manifestation of the zeta-function associated to prehomogeneous vector spaces. We remark, however, that although in the above mentioned papers, Lipschitz [Li], Lerch [Le], Hurwitz [H] are referred to, but are neither Malmst´en [Ma] nor Schl¨ omilch [Sch], who gave the functional equation for some Lfunctions (the L-function modulo 4, to be precise), nor the paper of Euler. In this regard we must take into account Weil’s paper [We], which gives a translation and comments on Eisenstein’s copy of Gauss’ Disquisitiones, especially the last page (dated 1849) inserted by the binder. On that page, Eisenstein made an “unmotivated” application of the Poisson summation formula to prove the functional equation for φ(ξ, a, s) from which he deduces that for L-function mod 4. His argument precedes Oberhettinger [Ob] by 107 years in that he uses the Fourier transform Z ∞ e2πixy xq−1 dx, 0

while Oberhettinger produces the proof by using the Laplace transform. The Fourier transform is also the basis of Mikol´ as’ proof [M3]. Here we

March 27, 2007

72

17:14


vista


may enjoy a happy encounter of some of the greatest unsimultaneous mathematicians of all time, Gauss, Eisenstein and Weil. We are also fascinated by Weil’s imagination on the source of Riemann’s paper. We are indebted to Sato’s paper [Sa] for this paper of Weil; without Sato’s, we may have missed it, and indeed, in no other places, this discovery of Eisenstein has been presented. E.g. in Grosswald, the Lipschitz transformation formula (i.e. the functional equation) is proved by the Poisson summation formula, which is in principle the same as Eisenstein’s proof. Sato’s paper (cf. [KTY7] as well) contains a very nice list of functional equations that follow from the theta-transformation formula and some other deep insight. We can present a high-brow proof using the Fourier series for the Dirac delta function δ(s) by completing the incomplete gamma functions. Our starting point is thus the combination of (41) and (43) of [KKSY] (where we write s for −u), which we state as (3.65) below. To derive it, we shall make full use of Formula (3.8) with l = 2 (even though any l ≥ 2 will work here):

1 1 1 au+1 + au − u au−1 u+1 2 12 Z u(u − 1) ∞ B 2 (t)(t + a)u−2 dt, − 2! 0

ζ(−u, a) = −

(3.50)

valid for Re s < 2, which coincides with [UN, Formula (24)]. Substituting the absolutely convergent Fourier series (cf. (1.9)):

∞ ∞ 1 X e2πint + e−2πint 1 X cos(2πnt) B 2 (t) = = 2 2π 2 n=1 n2 π n=1 n2

(3.51)

in the integral in (3.8) in the same context as in Rademacher [R, p.83], Pan and Pan [PP, p.125], Kanemitsu [Kan], and Ueno and Nishizawa [UN], we

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

73


infer after simplification that Z ∞ B 2 (t)(t + a)u−2 dt 0

=

(3.52)

Z ∞ ∞ 1 X 1 −2πina 1−u e (−2πin) e−x xu−2 dx 2π 2 n=1 n2 −2πina Z ∞ 2πina 1−u −x u−2 +e (2πin) e x dx 2πina

∞ 1 X 1 −2πina e (−2πin)1−u Γ(u − 1, −2πina) = 2π 2 n=1 n2 + e2πina (2πin)1−u Γ(u − 1, 2πina) ,

where Γ(s, z) designates the incomplete gamma function of the second kind defined by Z ∞ Γ(s, z) = e−x xs−1 dx. (3.53) z

The function Γ (s, z) can be expressed in terms of the confluent hypergeometric function as follows [Erd, p.266, Eq. 6.9 (21)]: Γ(s, z) = e−z Ψ(1 − s, 1 − s; z), where [Erd, p.255, Eq. 6.5(2)] Z ∞ 1 e−zt ta−1 (1 + t)c−a−1 dt, Ψ(a, c; z) = Γ(a) 0

(3.54)

min{Re a, Re z} > 0, (3.55)

is a solution of the differential equation: z

d2 w dw + (c − z) − aw = 0 dz 2 dz

(3.56)

and is denoted by U (a, c; z) in Slater [Sla]. Using [Erd, p.257, Eq. 6.5(6)] Ψ(a, c; z) = z 1−c Ψ(a − c + 1, 2 − c; z)

(3.57)

ez z −s Γ(s, z) = Ψ(1, 1 + s; z).

(3.58)

in (3.54), we get

March 27, 2007

17:14


74

vista


Substituting (3.58) in (3.52), we may write Z ∞ B 2 (t)(t + a)u−2 dt 0

=

∞ 1 X 1 u−1 a {Ψ(1, u; −2πina) + Ψ(1, u; 2πina)} , 2π 2 n=1 n2

(3.59)

which, when substituted in (3.50), gives rise to ζ(−u, a) 1 1 1 =− au+1 + au − u au−1 u+1 2 12 ∞ u(u − 1) au−1 X 1 − {Ψ (1, u; −2πina) + Ψ(1, u; 2πina)} . 2 2π 2 n=1 n2

(3.60)

To deduce the Ueno-Nishizawa formula [UN, Formula (25)], we take l = 1 and argue in the same way. We just state here the corresponding formulas: Z ∞ 1 1 B 1 (t)(t + a)u−1 dt, (3.61) au+1 + au + u ζ(−u, a) = − u+1 2 0 ∞ ∞ 1 X e2πint − e−2πint 1 X sin (2πnt) B 1 (t) = − =− , 2πi n=1 n π n=1 n Z

∞

B 1 (t)(t + a)u−1 dt

0

=−

and

(3.62)

∞ 1 X au −2πina e (−2πina)−u Γ(u, −2πina) 2πi n=1 n − e2πina (2πina)−u Γ(u, 2πina) ,

1 1 au+1 + au u+1 2 u au X 1 − Ψ(1, u + 1; −2πina), 2πi n

ζ(−u, a) = −

n6=0

which is [UN, Formula (25)].

(3.63)

(3.64)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

75


We shall use the combination of (3.61) and (3.63): ∞ e−2πina 1 X ζ(s, a) = s−1 Γ(1 − s, −2πina) a (−2πina)1−s n=1

e2πina Γ(1 − s, 2πina) + (2πina)1−s 1 1 1 + s + s−1 . 2a a s−1

(3.65)

We use the incomplete gamma function γ(s, a) of the first kind Z a Z 1 −u s−1 s γ(s, a) = e u du = a e−au us−1 du (3.66) 0

0

and complete Γ(1 − s, a) to write Γ(1 − s, a) = Γ(1 − s) − γ(1 − s, a). Thus ∞ X 1 1 e2πina 1 e−2πina + s + s−1 + ζ(s, a) = Γ(1 − s) 1−s 1−s (−2πin) (2πin) 2a a s − 1 n=1 Z ∞ 1 X −2πina 1 2πinau −s e u du − s−1 e a 0 n=1 Z 1 2πina −2πinau −s +e e u du . 0

We invert the order of summation and integration in the last term and P0 ∞ −2πina(u−1) consider the series as the Fourier series for δ(a(u − n=−∞ e 1)) − 1. Then we are left with the integration (σ < 0) Z 1 Z 1 1 1 −s − δ(a(u − 1)) u du + u−s du = − − . 2a s − 1 0 0 1 1 Hence the last term is − 2a1s − s−1 as−1 , which cancels the second term and we finally arrive at the Hurwitz formula Γ(1 − s) 1−s πi − 1−s 2 2 πi l l (1 − a) + e (a) , (3.67) ζ(s, a) = e 1−s 1−s (2π)1−s

which is equivalent to (3.48). Finally, we introduce a class of functions γn (x), n ∈ N (due to Milnor [Mi]) defined by γ1−t (x) =

∂ ζ(t, x) ∂t

(3.68)

March 27, 2007

17:14


76

vista


Note that

Γ(x) γ1 (x) = ζ 0 (0, x) = log √ . 2π

Exercise 3.1

Prove the Kubert identity q−1 X x+k s−1 ζ(1 − s, x) = q ζ 1 − s, q

(3.69)

k=0

for each n ∈ N (s 6= 0). Also prove the modified Kubert identity q−1 X 1 x+h n−1 γn (x) = (log q) Bn (x) + q . γn n q

(3.70)

k=0

Solution

By (8.12), Φ(s, a, 1) = ζ(s, a).

(3.71)

Hence (8.13) reduces to (3.69). To prove (3.70), we differentiate q s ζ(s, x) =

q−1 X x+k ζ s, , q

(3.72)

k=0

with respect to s to obtain ζ 0 (1 − n, x) = −(log q) ζ(1 − n, x) + q n−1

q−1 X x+k ζ 0 1 − n, . q k=0

This leads to (3.70) on appealing to (4.1). For more information on Kubert identities, the reader is referred to Sun [Su1].

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

Chapter 4

The theory of Bernoulli polynomilas via zeta-functions

Abstract In this chapter we shall deduce some of the basic properties of Bernoulli polynomials from those of the Hurwitz zetafunction. The basis is the relation (4.1). We may develop the theory of Euler polynomials in the same spirit. This is due to the fact that the Euler number En corresponds to the special value L(−n, χ4 ) of the Dirichlet L-function L(s, χ4 ) with the unique odd character mod 4 (cf. Chapter 8), which therefore is not presented (cf. e.g. [SC]). Exercise 4.1

Under (U ) deduce ζ(1 − n, x) = −

1 B n (x), n

n∈N

from (3.8). Solution

Formula (3.8) with u = n − 1, l = n reads for 0 < a < 1,

ζ(1 − n, a) = an−1 −

n 1 n X (−1)r n − 1 a − Br an−r . n r r − l r=1

This can be transformed, on using (cf. (1.13) and (1.16)) Br = (−1)r Br ,

r ≥ 2, 77

1 B1 = − , 2

(4.1)

March 27, 2007

17:14


78

vista


into n 1 n 1 n−1 1 X n − ζ(1 − n, a) = − a + a Br an−r n 2 n r=2 r n 1X n Br an−r , =− n r=0 r

which is (4.1) in view of (1.7). Remark 4.1 Since (3.8) depends on (1.1), we have deduces (4.1) under (D’) and (U). But since (D’), (A) and (U) are equivalent as giving Taylor coefficients, we may choose any one of them as a definition and assume other two valid. We may also define the Bernoulli polynomial Bs (x) as an integral function of s through the relation Bs (x) = −s ζ(1 − s, x)

(4.2)

as in [Ca] or [Mi] and develop the whole theory independently of Chapter 1 (which procedure will be sketched below), and thus we shall take (4.1) for granted and deduce other properties from (3.8) etc. As a special case of Exercise 4.1, we have (n ∈ N) ( − n1 Bn , n ≥ 2, 1 ζ(1 − n) = − Bn (1) = 1 n B1 = − , n = 1,

(4.3)

2

by (1.16), which in turn is a consequence of (1.9). Exercise 4.2 Solution

Deduce (1.9) from (3.67) and (A) (and (4.1)).

For 0 < x < 1, (3.67) reads for s = 1 − n, n ∈ N ζ(1 − n, x) =

Γ(n) − πi n πi {e 2 ln (x) + e 2 n ln (1 − x)}, n (2π)

(4.4)

so that B n (x) = −n ζ(1 − n, x) =−

Γ(n + 1) {(−i)n ln (x) + in ln (1 − x)} (2π)n

and B n (1 − x) = −

Γ(n + 1) {(−i)n ln (1 − x) + in ln (x)}. (2π)n

(4.5)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

79

The theory of Bernoulli polynomilas via zeta-functions

Comparing these completes the proof of (1.9) in the case 0 < x < 1. If, in general, n − 1 < x < n, n ∈ Z, then [x] = n and [1 − x] = −n, and therefore x∈ / Z.

[1 − x] = −[x],

(4.6)

By (A), Bn (x) = Bn (x + [x]) =

n X n k=0

k

B n−k (x)[x]k .

Substituting (1.9) for 0 < x < 1 and (4.6). we conclude (1.9) for x ∈ / Z. For x ∈ Z, (1.9) follows from continuity. Proposition 4.1 The difference relation (DE) for Bernoulli polynomials is a consequence of that for the Hurwitz zeta-function (3.4). Proof.

This follows immediately from (3.4) (under (4.1)): Bn (x + 1) − Bn (x) = −n{ζ(1 − n, x + 1) − ζ(1 − n, x)} = nxn−1 .

Proposition 4.2 The functional equation (3.67) for the Hurwitz zetafunction implies the Fourier expansion (H) for the Bernoulli polynomials. Proof.

(4.5) reads n! B n (x) = − (2πi)n

(

∞ X e2πikx k=1

kn

∞ X e2πi(−k)x + (−1) kn n

k=1

)

,

which gives (H) for n ≥ 2, since, then, the series are absolutely convergent. In the case n = 1, the sum is to be taken symmetrically: lim

N →∞

2πikx N N X X e−2πikx e sin 2πkx − , = lim 2i N →∞ k k k

k=−N k6=0

k=1

whence ∞ 1 X sin 2πkx B 1 (x) = − π k k=1

as in (7.9).

March 27, 2007

17:14

80


vista


Proposition 4.3 The Kubert identity (3.69) for the Hurwitz zetafunction implies the Kubert identity (1.8) for Bernoulli polynomials. Proof.

This follows from (3.69) on substituting (4.1).

Now that we have established (DE), (H) and (K) for Bernoulli polynomials, we may trace the logical path given at the end of Chapter 1 to complete the theory of Bernoulli polynomials.

March 27, 2007

17:14


Chapter 5

The theory of the gamma and related functions via zeta-functions

Abstract

In this chapter we shall give a new foundation of the theory of the gamma and related functions. The core of the idea lies in appealing to Lerch’s formula (5.4) through which we may transfer the results on the Hurwitz zeta-function to the gamma function (cf. [Mi]), as was the case with the Bernoulli polynomials and the function ζ(0, x) in Chapter 4. We shall give two (three if we count the uniqueness theorem as one) proofs of Lerch’s formula with minimum possible assumptions: the integral representation (5.1) for ζ(s,z) (which is a corollary to Theorem 3.1 and the value Γ 12 ). Then we continue to keep the assumption minimum by defining the digamma function by either of the conditions in Lemma 5.1 and the gamma function as its integral.

5.1

Derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta-function

Notation: s = σ + it is the complex variable; z is another complex variable, used interchangeably with s;

ψ(s) = − lim

N →∞

N X

1 − log(N + s) n+s n=0 81

!

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


82

vista


—the digamma function (cf. (5.18)); log Γ(s) =

Z

s

ψ(u) du 1

—the log-gamma function; γ = −ψ(1) —the Euler’s constant (cf. (5.16)); ζ(s, a) =

∞ X

1 (n + a)s n=0

—the Hurwitz zeta-function, where σ > 1, a ∈ C, a 6= non-negative integer; ζ(s) = ζ(s, 1) =

∞ X 1 , s n n=1

σ>1

—the Riemann zeta-function. For x ≥ 0, a ∈ C, a 6= non-negative integer, u ∈ C, X Lu (x, a) = (n + a)u 0≤n≤x

—the partial sum ((3.5)) of the Hurwitz zeta-function ζ(−u, a); B k (t) = Bk (t − [t]) —the k-th periodic Bernoulli polynomial; Bk (t) =

k X k

r

r=0

Br tk−r

—the k-th Bernoulli polynomial (cf. (1.7)); Bk -the k-th Bernoulli number; [t] —the integral part of t. Theorem 5.1 and ψ(z):

If we suppose the integral representations for ζ(s, z)

1 1 z 1−s + z −s − s ζ(s, z) = s−1 2

Z

∞

B 1 (t) (t + z)−s−1 dt,

0

1 ψ(z) = log z − z −1 + 2

Z

∞ 0

B 1 (t) (t + z)−2 dt,

σ > −1, (5.1) (5.2)

March 27, 2007

17:14



and also the value Γ

1 1 = π2 2

vista

83

(5.3)

as known, then we have Lerch’s formula Γ(z) ζ 0 (0, z) = log √ . 2π

(5.4)

Integrating (5.2) from 1 to z, we obtain Z z Z ∞ Z z 1 log Γ(z) = dz + B 1 (t) (t + z)−2 dz dt log z − 2z 1 0 1 1 = z log z − z − log z + 1 2 Z Z

Proof.

−

∞

∞

B 1 (t) (t + z)−1 dt +

0

(5.5)

B 1 (t) t−1 dt.

1

On the other hand, differentiation of (5.1) gives Z ∞ 1 0 B 1 (t) (t + z)−1 dt. ζ (0, z) = z log z − z − log z − 2 0 Comparing (5.5) and (5.6), we see that Z ζ 0 (0, z) = log Γ(z) − 1 −

∞

B 1 (t) t−1 dt

(5.6)

(5.7)

1

and it remains to evaluate the last integral. For this we differentiate the formula ζ s, 12 = (2s − 1) ζ(s) to obtain 1 = 2s (log 2) ζ(s) + (2s − 1) ζ 0 (s). (5.8) ζ 0 s, 2 Hence in view of ζ(0) = − 21 , a consequence of (5.1), 1 1 ζ 0 0, = (log 2) ζ(0) = − log 2. 2 2 in (5.7) and use the value of Γ( 12 ) to obtain Z ∞ √ 1 − log 2 = log π − 1 − B 1 (t) t−1 dt. 2 1

Now put z =

(5.9)

1 2

Hence 1+

Z

∞ 1

B 1 (t) t−1 dt = log

√

2π,

(5.10)

(5.11)

March 27, 2007

17:14


84

vista


which is of some interest in its own right. (5.6) and (5.11) combine to give (5.4). This completes the proof. Exercise 5.1

If we assume the integral representation (5.1) and the value √ ζ 0 (0) = − log 2π (5.12)

as known, then we have Lerch’s formula (5.4). Differentiation of (5.11) with respect to s gives rise to

Proof. ζ 0 (s, x) =

x1−s 1 −1 x1−s − log x − x−s log x − 2 (s − 1) s−1 2 Z ∞ −s B 1 (t) (t + x)−s−1 (− log(t + x)) dt,

Z

∞

B 1 (t) (t + x)−s−1 dt

0

0

whence 1 log x − 2

Z

1 1 1 ∂2 0 ζ (0, x) = + −2 ∂x2 x 2 x2

Z

ζ 0 (0, x) = −x + x log x −

∞

B 1 (t) (t + x)−1 dt.

(5.13)

B 1 (t) (t + x)−3 dt.

(5.14)

0

Now ∞

0

Now the last integral on the right-hand side of (5.14) is the sum of the terms Z n+1 t − n − 21 (t + x)−3 dt n

=

=

Z

n+1

n Z n+1 n

(t + x) − n + x +

1 2

(t + x)−2 − n + x +

1 2

(t + x)−3 dt

(t + x)−3 dt

n+1 1 1 + n + x + 12 (t + x)−2 t+x 2 n 1 1 = − n+x n+x+1 1 1 n + 1 + x − 21 (n + 1 + x)−2 − n + x + 12 (n + x)−2 + 2 2 1 1 − = n+x n+x+1

= −

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

85


1 + 2 Hence

Z

∞

1 1 − n+1+x n+x

1 − 4

1 1 + (n + 1 + x)2 (n + x)2

.

B 1 (t)(t + x)−3 dt

0

∞ ∞ 1 1 1X 1X 1 1 1 = − − + 2 n=0 n + x n + x + 1 2 n=0 (n + x)2 4 x2

=

∞ 1X 1 11 1 1 + − . 2 2x 4x 2 n=0 (n + x)2

Substituting this in (5.14), we obtain ∞

X ∂2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ζ (0, x) = + − − + ∂x2 x 2 x2 x 2 x2 n=0 (n + x)2 = ζ(2, x).

It is essential to notice that ∞ X d Γ0 d 1 d2 log Γ(x) = (x) = ψ(x) = , 2 dx dx Γ dx (n + x)2 n=0

the last being due to (5.17) below. Hence ∂2 0 d2 ζ (0, x) = log Γ(x). 2 ∂x dx2

(5.15)

(5.15) gives rise to ζ 0 (0, x) = log Γ(x) + ax + b. First ζ 0 (0, 1) = a + b and ζ 0 (0, 2) = 2a + b. Recalling ζ(s, x + 1) = ζ(s, x) − x−s , we see that ζ 0 (s, x + 1) = ζ 0 (s, x) + x log x, whence ζ 0 (0, 2) = ζ 0 (0, 1). Hence a = 0. The value of b = ζ 0 (0, 1) = ζ 0 (0) is determined by (5.12) and we have √ ζ 0 (0, x) = log Γ(x) − log 2π, −s

March 27, 2007

17:14


86

vista


i.e. Lerch’s formula. Lemma 5.1

Under the definition of Euler’s constant ! N X 1 γ = lim − log(N + z) N →∞ n n=1

(5.16)

for any z other than negative integers, the two definitions for ψ are equivalent: ∞ X 1 1 , (5.17) − ψ(z) + γ = n z+n−1 n=1 the Gaussian representation (cf. (5.41)), and ψ(z) = − lim

N →∞

! 1 − log(N + z) , n+z n=0 N X

(5.18)

for any z other than negative integers, the generic definition. Proof.

Substituting (5.16) in (5.17) in the form N X 1

1 ψ(z) + γ = lim − N →∞ n z+n+1 n=1 N X 1 − log(N + z) = lim N →∞ n n=1 ! N X 1 − − log(N + z) , z+n−1 n=1 we deduce that ψ(z) + γ = γ − lim

N →∞

N X

n=0

1 − log(N + z) , z+n

whence (5.18). On the other hand, (5.18) may be written as N X 1

1 − ψ(z) = lim N →∞ n z + n −1 n=1 ∞ X 1 1 = − γ, − n z+n−1 n=1

−

N X 1

n=1

n

− log(N + z)

!

,

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

87

i.e. (5.17).

Remark 5.1 In (5.16), z is usually taken to be 0, but can be any number as in (5.16) because log(N + z) − log(N + w) → 0,

N → ∞.

The absolute convergence of the series in (5.17) is clear because each term is O n12 , and the existence of limits in (5.16) and (5.18) follows from the comparison with the corresponding integral, or the Euler-Maclaurin formula (cf. Chapter 2). We shall illustrate the far-reaching power of Theorem 3.1 by the first ∂ Lu (x, a) or −ζ 0 (−u, a)) in the special case of u = m, m ∈ derivative ( ∂u N ∪ {0}. For N 3 l > m + 1, Corollary 3.1 eventually yields (cf. [KTTY3]) −ζ 0 (−m, a) = lim

N →∞

N X

(n + a)m log(n + a)

(5.19)

n=0

1 1 (N + a)m+1 log(N + a) + (N + a)m+1 m+1 (m + 1)2 m+1 X m Br 1 − (N + a)m log(N + a) − r − 1 r! 2 r=2 ! 1 1 m−r+1 · +··· + + log(N + a) (N + a) . m m−r+2

−

and ζ 0 (−m, a) (5.20) 1 1 1 1 am+1 log a − am+1 − am log a + am−1 log a = m+1 (m + 1)2 2 12   m+1 r−2 X Br X m 1  (−1)j m + + log a r −1 r r − 1 − j j r=4 j=0   r−1 l X X 1 r−m−2 1  m−r+1 + Br  (−1)j a j m + 1 r=m+2 r − j j=0   Z ∞ X l−1 1  (−1)j l − m − 1 B l (t)(t + a)m−l  dt, + (−1)l+1 l − j j 0 j=0

where (5.19) and (5.20) correspond to (3.7) and (3.8), respectively.

March 27, 2007

17:14


88

vista


Exercise 5.2 Show that, in view of Lerch’s formula (5.4), (5.19) with m = 0 gives Euler’s product formula (or Weierstrass’ canonical product of genus 1) (5.21) for Γ(a). ∞ Y 1 −a a 1 1+ 1+ , =a Γ(a) n n n=1 Solution

(5.21)

Indeed, (5.19) with m = 0 reads N X

−ζ 0 (0, a) = lim

N →∞

n=0

log(n + a) −

1 log(N + a) 2

(5.22)

!

− (N + a) log(N + a) + N + a . For a = 1, (5.22) with N + 1 replaced by N gives 0

−ζ (0) = lim

N →∞

N X

1 log n − N + 2 n=1

log N + N

!

.

(5.23)

Substituting 1 1 log(N + a) = log N + o(1), 2 2 (N + a) log(N + a) = N log N + a log N + a + o(1), we transform (5.22), under (5.4), into Γ(a) − log √ 2π ! N X 1 = lim log N + N − a log N . log(n + a) − N + N →∞ 2 n=0

(5.24)

Subtracting (5.23) from (5.24) yields, on using (2.20),

− log Γ(a) = lim

N →∞

N X

n+a − a log N log a + log n n=1

!

.

(5.25)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

89


PN −1

By expressing log N as

n=1

log n+1 n , we may write

n + a n + 1 −a log − log Γ(a) = lim log a + · N →∞ n n n=1 ∞ X a 1 −a 1+ , = log a + log 1+ n n n=1 N X

!

(5.26)

whence (5.21). Remark 5.2 Our procedure is a reverse to that of Berndt [Ber2] in which he starts from one of the equivalent definitions of the gamma function given by N ! (N + 1)a , N →∞ a(a + 1) · · · (a + N )

(5.27)

Γ(a) = lim Euler’s interpolation formula or log Γ(a) = lim

N →∞

−

N X

log(n + a) +

n=0

N X

log n + a log(N + 1)

n=1

!

(5.27)0

and deduces Lerch’s formula by comparing (5.27)0 with (5.22) (and (5.23)). Of course, we can cover (5.27)0 in the same way as above. Indeed, from (5.23) and (5.24), we deduce that 0

0

N X

−ζ (0, a) + ζ (0) = lim

N →∞

n=0

log(n + a) −

N X

n=1

log n − a log N

!

,

which√reduces to (5.27)0 by Lerch’s formula, save for the value ζ 0 (0) = − log 2π; this value is found in Exercise 2.6 with the Stirling’s formula being taken for granted. We now turn to recover Deninger’s Theorem 2.3 [D], especially, the Gaussian representation −ζ 00 (0, a) = −ζ 00 (0) − log2 a + lim

N →∞

2

a log N −

N X

n=1

2

2

log (n + a) − log n

!

.

(5.28)

March 27, 2007

17:14


90

vista


Indeed, choosing u = 0 and x = N ∈ N in Corollary 3.2, we get N X

log2 (n + a) =

n=0

Z ∞ 1 B 1 (t) log2 (N + a) − log2 (t + a) dt (5.29) 2 t + a N + (N + a) log2 (N + a) − 2 log(N + a) + 2 + ζ 00 (0, a).

Put a = 1 and write N for N + 1 in (5.29) to get N X

Z

∞

B 1 (t) log2 t dt t (5.30) N n=1 2 00 + N log N − 2 log N + 2 + ζ (0). Noting that log(N + a) = log N + Na + O N12 , we have log2 (N + a) = 1 log2 N + 2a N log N + O N 2 . Hence log2 n =

1 log2 N − 2

(N + a){log2 (N + a) − 2 log(N + a) + 2}

= N log2 N − 2N log N + 2N + a log2 N + O

1 N

.

Hence (5.29) may be written as N X

1 log2 N − 2

log2 (n + a) =

n=1

Z

∞ N

+N log2 N − 2N log N + 2N

+ a log2 N − log2 a + ζ 00 (0, a) + O

1 N

(5.29)0

.

From (5.29)0 and (5.30) it follows that −ζ 00 (0, a) = −ζ 00 (0) + a log2 N − log2 a − −

Z

∞

B1 (t)

N

2

N X

n=1 2

log (t + a) log t − t+a t

log2 (n + a) − log2 n

dt + O

1 N

,

or −ζ 00 (0, a) = − ζ 00 (0) − log2 a + a log2 N −

N X

n=1

log2 N log (n + a) − log n + O N 2

2

upon estimating the integral. Now (5.31) implies (5.28).

(5.31)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

91


We may also recover the Weierstrass representation ([D, (2.3.2)]) by Corollary 3.1 with u = −1, a = 1 and x = N ∈ N (we write N for N + 1):

or

Z ∞ N X 1 −1 1 log n B 1 (t) = N log N − log t dt + log2 N + γ1 2 n 2 t 2 N n=1 γ1 =

N X log n 1 log N . − log2 N + O n 2 N n=1

(5.32)

(cf. [KKSY, (8)]). Solving (5.32) for log2 N and substituting it in (5.31), we deduce that −ζ 00 (0, a) = − ζ 00 (0) − 2 γ1 log a − log2 a (5.33) N X log n log2 N +O . log2 (n + a) − log2 n − 2 − n N n=1 5.2

Asymptotic formulas for the Hurwitz and related zetafunctions in the second variable 0

In this section we shall show that our formula (3.8) below coincides with Katsurada’s formula (2.2) (Theorem 1 of [Kat1]) in the special case when λ = 1. Since our formula (3.44) with confluent hypergeometric function coefficients readily extends to a general l, it suffices to show that the main terms coincide with each other. We suppose that u 6= −1 Formula (3.8) with α + z in place 1and apply u u+1 1 of a, and the relations r−1 r = u+1 r and ( Bk , k 6= 1 k (−1) Bk = Bk (1) = B1 + 1, k = 1, (cf. (1.16)) in order to obtain l 1 X u+1 ζ(−u, α+z) = − (α+z)u−r+1 Br +O |z|Re (u)−l . (3.8)0 u + 1 r=0 r Supposing further that |α| < |z|, we infer, by the binomial expansion, 0 that the right-hand side of (3.8) can be written as S + O |z|Re (u)−l ,

March 27, 2007

17:14


92

vista


where S := −

l l 1 XX u+1 u+1−r Br αk−r z u−k+1 , u + 1 r=0 r k−r k=r

since, for k ≥ l − r, we have Re (u) − r − k ≤ Re (u) − l. Using (1.14), we obtain l k 1 X u + 1 u−k+1 u−k+1 X k z z S=− Br αk−r , u+1 k r r=0 k=0

whose innermost sum is precisely Bk (α). Hence we conclude that S=−

l−1 X (−1)r+1 1 z u+1 + (−u)r Br+1 (α) z u−r . u+1 (r + 1)! r=0

(5.34)

Substituting (5.34) into (3.8)0 , we obtain the special case of Katsurada’s result [Kat1, p.168, Theorem 1] when λ = 1. Theorem 5.2

For any integer l ≥ 0 and any z in | arg (z) | < π, l−1

ζ(s, α + z) =

X (−1)r+1 1 z 1−s + Br+1 (α) (s)r z −s−r s−1 (r + 1)! r=0 −Re (s)−l + O |z| .

(5.35)

Remark 5.3 Formula (5.35), in conjunction with a generalization of Formula (3.64) will yield the aforementioned special case of Katsurada’s main result [Kat1, p.168, Formula (2.2)]. The method of proof of Theorem 5.2 readily extends to −ζ 0 (s, α) and ζ (s, α) contained in Corollary 3.1 and Corollary 3.2, respectively. Thus we have the following consequences of Theorem 3.1 corresponding to Katsurada’s Corollary 1 and Corollary 2 in [Kat1]. We restate these results (see Corollary 3.3 and Corollary 3.2) in terms of log Γ(z) and R(z) in view of Lerch’s formula (5.4) and Deninger’s definition: 00

R(z) = − ζ 00 (0, z). Corollary 5.1

(5.36)

For any integer l and any fixed α > 0, the generalized

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

93


Stirling’s formula: log

Γ(z + α) √ 2π

1 = z+α− log z − z 2 +

l−1 X (−1)r+1 r=1

r(r + 1)

Br+1 (α) z −r + O |z|−l

holds true for z → ∞ and | arg (z) | ≤ π − δ (δ > 0). For any integer l ≥ 1 and fixed α > 0,

Corollary 5.2

1 R(z + α) = z + α − 2 +

l−1 X (−1)r+1 r=1

r(r + 1)

+ O |z|

−l

2

(log z) − 2z log z + 2z Br+1 (α) z

log(|z| + 1)

r−1 X 1 log z − h

−r

h=1

!

(5.37)

valid for z −→ ∞ and |arg (z)| ≤ π − δ (δ > 0) 5.3

An application of the Euler digamma function

In this section what we are going to mainly use is the case u = −1 of Theorem 3.1, which we restate as the following: For x ≥ 0, a ∈ C, a 6=non-negative integer, we have

Theorem 5.3

L−1 (x, a) = log(x + a) − ψ(a) −

l X 1 r=1

r

B r (x) (x + a)−r +

Z

∞

B l (t) (t + a)−1−l dt.

(5.38)

x

Corollary 5.3 (i) (3.14) is a special case of (5.38) with x = 0. (ii) (5.18) is a special case of (5.38) as x → ∞. (iii) ψ(a) admits the Gaussian representation N

ψ(a) = lim

N →∞

1 X a − − −z + N a k=1

1 1 − k+a k

!

.

(5.39)

March 27, 2007

17:14


94

vista


Proof. Only (5.39) needs a proof, which goes on the similar lines as those for the case u = −1 of Theorem 3.1. Formula (5.38) gives X 1 1 ψ(a) = log(x + a) − , +O n+a x 0≤n≤x

which we slightly rewrite as N

N +a X − ψ(a) = log N n=1

1 1 − n+a n

N X 1 1 + log N − . +O n N n=1

Recalling (5.16) (which fact is also contained in Theorem 5.3), we deduce (5.39), on taking the limit as N → ∞. Now we shall see what formula (5.39) means in the light of the Dufresnoy-Pisot type uniqueness theorem ( cf. [D]). Lemma 5.2 satisfies

If the function g : R+ → R (R+ meaning positive reals) lim (g(x + n) − g(n)) = 0,

n→∞

0 < x ≤ 1,

(5.40)

then for any λ ∈ R there is at most one function f : R+ → R with the following properties: (a) f (1) = λ (b) f is convex on some interval (A, ∞), A > 0 (c) f is a solution of the difference equation (DE) f (x + 1) − f (x) = g(x),

x ∈ R+ .

If such a function exists, it is given by the Gaussian representation (cf. (5.17)) ! n−1 X f (x) = lim λ + x g(n) − g(x) − (g(x + k) − g(k)) . (5.41) n→∞

k=1

Theorem 5.4 (i) The digamma function ψ(a) defined by (5.18) is a unique solution (convex for large argument) of the DE f (x + 1) − f (x) =

1 , x

x ∈ R+ .

(5.42)

(ii) (5.39) is exactly (5.41), furnished by the Dufresnoy-Pisot type theorem, which already entails Assertion (i).

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

95

Proof. For curiosity, we prove (i) without assuming (5.39). With g(x) = 1 x , (5.40) is satisfied. (a) follows from the definition and (c) follows from (5.18); only (b) remains. We differentiate (5.2) to obtain Z ∞ 1 1 B 1 (t) (t + a)−4 dt. (5.43) ψ 00 (a) = − 3 − 2 + 6 a a 0 To express the last integral inR closed form is an easy exercise. Indeed, n+1 it is the sum of integrals of type n . Since

1 B 1 (t)(t + a) dt = t+a− a+n+ (t + a)−4 dt 2 n n Z n+1 Z n+1 1 = (t + a)−3 dt − a + n + (t + a)−4 dt 2 n n 1 = − (n + 1 + a)−2 − (n + a)−2 2 1 1 n+a+ (n + 1 + a)−3 − (n + a)−3 + 3 2 1 1 1 = − (n + 1 + a)−2 − (n + a)−2 + (n + a + 1)−2 − (n + 1 + a)−3 2 3 2 1 1 (n + a)−2 + (n + a)−3 − 3 2 1 1 = − (n + 1 + a)−2 − (n + a)−2 − (n + a + 1)−3 + (n + a)−3 , 6 6

Z

n+1

Z

−4

n+1

summing these for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, · · · , we obtain Z

∞

B 1 (t) (t + a)−4 dt =

0

∞ 1 −2 1 −3 1 X 1 a − a − . 6 6 6 n=0 (n + 1 + a)3

Hence ψ 00 (a) = −

2 − ζ(3, a + 1) < 0, a3

and (b) follows, whence uniqueness follows from Lemma 5.2. Corollary 5.4

(5.44)

(i) For |z| < 1 we have ∞ X k=2

ζ(k, a) z k−1 = −ψ(a − z) + ψ(a).

(5.45)

March 27, 2007

17:14


96

vista

Vistas of Special Functions Γ(z) is the unique solution (convex for large argument) of the DE (ii) log √ 2π

f (x + 1) − f (x) = log x.

(5.46)

Proof. (i) is well-known and best viewed as the Taylor expansion of ζ(s, a) in the second variable a (cf. [Klu], [KKaY], [SC]) and the proof is immediate as follows. The left side of (5.45) is k ∞ ∞ 1 XX z 1 = (n + a)k z n=0 n+a n=0 k=2 k=2 2 z ∞ ∞ X 1 X n+a 1 = = z z n=0 1 − n+a (n + a − z)(n + a) n=0   X 1 1 , = lim  − log(x + a − z) + log(x + a) − x→∞ n+a−z n+a ∞ X

z k−1

∞ X

0≤n≤x

which is the right side of (5.45), in view of (5.18).

Assertion (ii) is known as the Bohr-Mollerup theorem, and is a consequence of Lemma 5.2. We could cover (ii) also by our Theorem 5.3, (ii) if only we assume we know the value (5.12) ζ 0 (0) = log √12π . We may also regard (ii) as Lerch’s formula (5.4) ([Ber2]). Corollary 5.5

We have the duplication formula 1 1 1 + log 2, ψ(2z) = ψ(z) + ψ z + 2 2 2

(5.47)

and, a fortiori,

Γ(2z) = 2

2z−1 − 21

π

1 Γ(z) Γ z + 2

.

(5.48)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

97


Indeed, using (5.18) in the form 1 1 1 ψ(z) + ψ z + 2 2 2 1 1 = lim log(x + z) x + z + x→∞ 2 2

Proof.

X



X

1  2n + 1 + 2z 0≤2n+1≤2x+1 0≤2n≤2x   2 X 1 1 1  = lim  log 4 x + z + − log 2 − , x→∞ 2 2 n + 2z −

1 − 2n + 2z

0≤n≤2x+1

which is ψ(z) − log 2. (5.48) follow from (5.47) if we use Γ

1 2

=

√

π.

Remark 5.4 The property in Corollary 5.3 is a special case of the Kubert identity (or distribution property) shared by a wide class of functions (cf. (8.13), [Mi], [Su1]).

5.4

The first circle

Proposition 5.1

The product representation for the gamma function Γ(z + 1) = e−γz

z −1 z en 1 + n n=1 ∞ Y

(5.49)

is a consequence of (5.45). Exercise 5.3 Solution

Deduce (5.49) from (5.45).

Integrating (5.45) from 0 to z, we obtain ∞ X ζ(k, a) k z = log Γ(a − z) − log Γ(a) + ψ(a) z, k

(5.50)

k=2

which is also a well-known formula (cf. e.g. [SC]). We need only the special case of (5.50) with a = 1, z replaced by −z: ∞ X (−z)k

k=2

k

ζ(k) = log Γ(z + 1) + γ z.

(5.51)

March 27, 2007

17:14


98

vista


We now apply a procedure similar to that of the proof of Corollary 5.4. We see that the left side of (5.51) becomes ∞ X ∞ X 1 z k − , k n n=1 k=2

the inner sum of which can be summed by the elementary formula (|r| < 1) ∞ X 1 k r = −r − log(1 − r). k k=2

Hence ∞ X (−z)k

k=2

k

ζ(k) =

z . − log 1 + n n

∞ X z

n=1

(5.52)

Combining (5.50) and (5.51) completes the proof of (5.49). Proposition 5.2

The reciprocal relation Γ(s) Γ(1 − s) =

π , sin πs

(5.53)

for the gamma function is a consequence of the asymmetric form of the functional equation πs ζ(1 − s) = 21−s π −s Γ(s) cos ζ(s), (5.54) 2 for the Riemann zeta-function.

Proof.

Changing s by 1 − s in (5.54), we deduce its counterpart πs ζ(s) = 2s π s−1 Γ(1 − s) sin ζ(1 − s). (5.55) 2

Multiplying (5.54) and (5.55) and canceling the common factor ζ(s) ζ(1 − s), we arrive at (5.53).

Remark 5.5 The proof of Proposition 5.2 is modeled on Eisenstein’s 1849 proof (cf. [We]) of the functional equation for the Hurwitz-Lerch zetafunction. A standard proof (cf. e.g. [Leb] and Exercise R ∞ 1−z2.3) is via the beta function. Use is made of the integral formula 0 x1+x dx = sinππz , 0 < Re z < 1.

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

99

Lemma 5.3 The asymmetric form (5.54) of the functional equation for the Riemann zeta-function is a consequence of the functional equation for the Hurwitz zeta-function (or the Hurwitz formula) (0 < a < 1) π π ζ(s, a) = −i (2π)s−1 Γ(1 − s) e 2 is l1−s (a) − e− 2 is l1−s (1 − a) , (5.56)

∞ X e2πina stands for the polylogarithm function (3.3), Forns n=1 mula (5.56) (which already appeared as (3.48) and (3.67)) in the long run, is a consequence of (5.1).

where ls (a) =

A recent proof of (5.56) based on the Fourier expansion of the Dirac delta function can be found in [BKT] or [KTTY3] and is sketched in §3.5. A more laborious but easier proof can be found in [R] (for the Riemann zeta) and [PP] (for the general case). It amounts to completing the integral in 1 1 1 a1−s + a−s + s a−s−1 ζ(s, a) = s−1 2 12 Z (5.57) s(s + 1) ∞ − B 2 (t) (t + a)−s−2 dt, σ > −2, 2 0 R∞ in the from −a B 2 (t)(t + a)−s−2 dt, then using the absolutely converging Fourier series for B 2 (t) and appealing to a formula for the Mellin transform. We refer to the above references. Proposition 5.3

The product representation for the sine function ∞ Y sin πz z2 (5.58) = 1− 2 , πz n n=1

is a consequence of (5.49) and (5.53). Proof.

Writing −z for z in (5.49), we get

z z −1 . e− n 1 − n n=1

(5.59)

Multiplying (5.49) and (5.59), we deduce that −1 ∞ Y z2 z Γ(z) Γ(1 − z) = 1− 2 , n n=1

(5.60)

Γ(1 − z) = eγz

∞ Y

where we used the formula Γ(z + 1) = zΓ(z), which is also a consequence of (5.49) and (5.16). Plugging (5.53) in (5.60) gives (5.58).

March 27, 2007

17:14


100

vista


Proposition 5.4 tion

The partial fraction expansion for the cotangent func∞ 2z X 1 1 − πz π n=1 n2 − z 2 ∞ 1 1X 1 1 = , + − πz π n=1 n + z n−z

cot πz =

(5.61)

is a consequence of (5.58). Proof.

This follows immediately by logarithmic differentiation.

Remark 5.6 again.

Comparing (5.17) and (5.61), we cover formula (2.55)

Proposition 5.5 The partial fraction expansion for the hyperbolic cotangent function and (5.61) are equivalent: ∞ 1 1 1 xX 1 1 coth πx = 2πx + = + , 2 e −1 2 2πx π n=1 n2 + x2

Re x ≥ 0.

(5.62)

Proof. This follows by putting ix = z in (5.61) (i.e., we move from the right half-plane into the upper half-plane). Lemma 5.4 The partial fraction expansion for coth x and the (symmetric form) functional equation s 1−s − s2 − 1−s 2 π Γ Γ ζ(s) = π ζ(1 − s), (5.63) 2 2 are equivalent. Proof.

This can be found in [KTTY4], [Ko].

Remark 5.7 Historically, (5.62) was first used to deduce (5.63) (the fifth proof of [Tit], where an appeal to a formula (cf. Corollary A.4) for the Mellin transform is needed). Then Koshlyakov [Ko] deduced (5.62) from (5.63). Supplementarily, we state a result which allows us to skip above propositions and deduce (5.61) directly from (5.56) or rather its equivalent under (5.53): o Γ(1 + s) n πis πis 2 ζ(1 + s, x) − e− 2 ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) . (5.56)0 l−s (x) = i e (2π)1+s

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

101

Proposition 5.6 The functional equation (5.56) for the Hurwitz zetafunction implies the partial fraction expansion (5.61) for the cot-function. Proof. We remark that the functional equation (5.56) for ζ(s, x) may be expressed on the basis of (5.53) as (5.56)0 . First we assume that Im x > 0. Then the sum for l0 (x) converges for every s ∈ C, and the left-hand side is l0 (x) =

∞ X

e2πinx =

n=1

e2πix 1 = (−1 + i cot πx) . 2πix 1−e 2

(5.64)

By analytic continuation, this holds true for every x ∈ R − Z. We consider the limit as s → 0, s > 0 on the right hand side of (5.56)0 . First we note that o n πis πis e 2 ζ(1 + s, x) − e− 2 ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) − {ζ(1 + s, x) − ζ(1 + s, 1 − x)} πis πis = e 2 − 1 ζ(1 + s, x) − e− 2 − 1 ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) o πis πs n πis e 4 ζ(1 + s, x) + e− 4 ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) = 2i sin 4 o n πis sin πs πis 4 π = 2i π e 4 s ζ(1 + s, x) + e− 4 s ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) , 4 4s which tends to πi as s → 0 on account of lims→0 s ζ(1 + s, x) = 1. Secondly, since ∞ X 1 1 ζ(1 + s, x) − ζ(1 + s, 1 − x) = − , (n + x)1+s (n + 1 − x)1+s n=0

σ>0

we get lim

(ζ(1 + s, x) − ζ(1 + s, 1 − x)) ∞ 1 1 X 2x 1 − = + . n+x n+1−x x n=1 x2 − n2

s→0,s>0 ∞ X

=

n=0

Hence the limit of the right-hand side of (5.56)0 as s → 0 through positive values is i

∞

1 X 2x + . x n=1 x2 − n2

Combining this with (5.64), we conclude (5.61).

March 27, 2007

17:14


102

vista


Proposition 5.7 The functional equations in symmetric form (5.63) and in asymmetric form (5.54) are equivalent under (5.48) and (5.53). Proof is immediate. Lemma 5.5 The functional equation (5.63) for the Riemann zetafunction and (5.56) for the Hurwitz zeta-function are equivalent. Proof. This can be found in [KTTY4], [BKT] and is a manifestation of the most far-reaching modular relation principle. We are now in a position to state the main result of this chapter. Theorem 5.5 Under some known formulas, all formulas (5.53), (5.54), (5.56), (5.58), (5.61), (5.62) and (5.63) are equivalent in the sense of the following logical scheme (the portion including (5.65) is due to Theorem 5.6): (5.17)

=⇒

(5.49)

(5.56) ⇒ (5.54) ⇒ (5.53)

⇒

⇒ ⇐

(5.58) ⇔ (5.61) ⇔ (5.62) ⇔ (5.63) ⇔ (5.56) m m (5.65) ⇐ (5.56) (5.54)

Lemma 5.6 (Berndt) The functional equation (5.56) for the Hurwitz zeta function implies Kummer’s Fourier series for log Γ(x), which reads 1 1 Γ(x) = − log(2 sin πx) + (γ + log 2π)(1 − 2x) log √ 2 2 2π ∞ X 1 log n + sin 2πnx, π n=1 n

(5.65)

which implies the reciprocal relation (5.49). Proof is given by Berndt [Ber2], which depends on Lerch’s formula (5.4) and the integral representation (5.1) for ζ(s, z) with z = 0. Theorem 5.6 Kummer’s Fourier series for log Γ(x) is equivalent to the functional equation (5.63) for the Riemann zeta-function. Exercise 5.4

Deduce Euler’s identity 2 ζ(2m) B2m = (−1)m−1 , (2m)! (2π)2m

m≥1

(5.66)

from the partial fraction expansion (5.62) for the hyperbolic cotangent function.

March 27, 2007

17:14



Solution

vista

103

Rewriting (5.66) in the form ∞ X 1 2πx 2 + πx = 1 + 2x 2 + x2 e2πx − 1 n n=1

and putting 2πx = z, we obtain ∞ X z 1 1 2 = 1 − z + 2z z 2 e −1 2 z + (2πn)2 n=1 1 = 1 − z + 2z 2 ϕ z 2 2

say, where

ϕ(w) =

∞ X

w + 4π 2 n2

n=1

−1

(5.67)

.

(5.68)

Since ϕ(r) (w) = (−1)r r!

∞ X r=0

w + 4π 2 n2

−r−1

,

we see that ∞ X ϕ(r) (0) (−1)r 1 = (−1)r = ζ(2r + 2). 2r+2 r! (2πn) (2π)2r+2 n=1

Hence ∞ X 1 (−1)r z = 1 − z + 2 ζ(2r + 2) z 2r+2 , 2r+2 ez − 1 2 (2π) r=0

and so ∞ X z 1 2 (−1)m−1 = 1 − z + ζ(2m) z 2m . 2m ez − 1 2 (2π) m=1

Recalling the expansion ∞ X 1 B2m 2m z = 1 − z + z , z e −1 2 (2m)! m=1

we conclude (5.66).

March 27, 2007

104

17:14



Remark 5.8 As is proved above, (5.62) and the functional equation for the Riemann zeta-function are equivalent, whence we see that Euler’s iden2 tity (5.66), and in particular the solution to the Basel problem ζ(2) = π6 , is a consequence of the functional equation.

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Chapter 6

The theory of Bessel functions and the Epstein zeta-functions

Abstract In this chapter we study an energy invariant – the Madelung constant associated to a crystal lattice through the lattice zeta-function, which is manifested as the Epstein zeta-function. We take into account the lattice structure (crystal symmetry) in our study through the functional equation of the Epstein zeta-function (zeta symmetry).

6.1

Introduction and the theory of Bessel functions

In this chapter we are going to study an energy invariant associated to a crystal lattice, called the Madelung constant about which numerous papers have appeared so far. Main references in book form are [Bor], [GZ] and [Ter1]. The main feature of our treatment in this regard is that we incorporate the lattice structure in its full extent, especially, the relationships between mutually dual lattice structures are revealed as those between the associated lattice zeta-functions, which are in turn manifested as the Epstein zeta-functions. That is, unlike previous work (save for Terras), we are going to express the distance and ion charges of the crystal structure in the form of a quadratic form and construct the Epstein zeta-functions associated to it, and then apply decomposition of the coefficient matrices to the Epstein zeta-function as is seen in Terras [Ter1]. For more details we refer to [KTTY2]. As the second main feature, we shall present a rather complete version of the theory of Epstein zeta-functions, which include generalizations of the 105

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


106

vista


theory of Berndt [Ber6], Chowla-Selberg and Terras as well as a unification of the theory of lattice zeta-values developed so far. They are manifested as the special values like ζ(1/2), β(1/2), where β(s) = L(s, χ4 ) referred to in Abstract of Chapter 4, and we may efficiently incorporate our recent results on special values (see [KTY7]), using a perturbed Dirichlet series, or the Mellin-Barnes integrals (6.70) (cf. Paris-Kaminski [PK]). Definition 6.1 The n-th Bessel function Jn (z) is defined as the n-th 1 z Laurent coefficient of the function exp 2 (w − w ) in w, viz. exp Proposition 6.1 tegral)

∞ X 1 z w− = Jn (z) wn . 2 w n=−∞

We have the integral representation (called Bessel’s in-

Jn (z) = Proof.

(6.1)

1 π

Z

π 0

cos(z sin θ − nθ) dθ.

(6.2)

By Theorem A.11, we have the integral representation Z exp z2 (w − w1 ) 1 dw. Jn (z) = 2πi |w|=1 wn+1

By the parametric expression for the curve |w| = 1: w = eiθ , 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π, we may rewrite the above as Z 2π 1 ei(z sin θ−nθ) dθ (6.3) Jn (z) = 2π 0 on noting that w − w1 = 2i sin θ. Dividing the interval [0, 2π] into [0, π] and [π, 2π] and making the change of variable in the integral over [π, 2π], we obtain Z π 1 Jn (z) = e−i(z sin θ−nθ) dθ. 2π 0 Adding this to the integral over [0, π], we conclude (6.2). Proposition 6.2

The ν-th Bessel function Jν (z) may be defined by Jν (z) =

z ν+2n (−1)n . n! Γ(ν + n + 1) 2 n=0 ∞ X

(6.4)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

107

Proof. For ν ∈ Z, Jν (z) is also defined as the ν-th coefficient of the z z 1 product of two power series for e 2 w and e− 2 w . Hence the ν-th term is given by ∞ z 2 X z ν 1 (−1)n z ν X (−1)n , = 2 m! n! 2 n=0 Γ(ν + n + 1) n! 2 m−n=ν

as claimed. For other values of ν, we understand (6.4) as the definition. We note that from (6.2) it results J−n (z) = (−1)n Jn (z) Exercise 6.1 Solution

(6.5)

Viewing (6.1) as a Fourier series, deduce (6.2).

With w = eiθ (θ ∈ R), (6.1) reads eiz sin θ =

∞ X

Jn (z) einθ ,

n=−∞

which is a Fourier series converging to the left-hand side member (in view of Theorem 7.2) and the Fourier coefficient Jn (z) may be computed by (7.2): Z π 1 ei(z sin θ−nθ) dθ, Jn (z) = 2π −π which is (6.3), and we may argue as in the proof of Proposition 6.1. Exercise 6.2

Use (6.5) to deduce for n even Z 1 π cos(z sin θ) cos(nθ) dθ = Jn (z) π 0 1 π

Z

1 π

Z

(6.6)

π

sin(z sin θ) sin(nθ) dθ = 0 0

while for n odd,

1 π

Z

π

cos(z sin θ) cos(nθ) dθ = 0 0

π

sin(z sin θ) sin(nθ) dθ = Jn (z) 0

(6.7)

March 27, 2007

17:14


108

vista


Solution Jn (z) + J−n (z) is 2Jn (z) for n even and 0 for n odd, and by (6.2), this is Z 1 π (cos(z sin θ − nθ) + cos(z sin θ + nθ)) dθ, π 0 whence the first and the second identities follow. Considering Jn (z) − J−n (z), we deduce the third and the fourth identities. In case ν ∈ / Z, the Bessel functions Jν (x) and J−ν (x) are two independent solutions to the Bessel differential equation d2 y 1 dy n2 + + 1 − 2 y = 0. (6.8) dx2 x dx x For n ∈ Z, the fundamental solutions to (6.8) are given by Jn (x) and Yn (x), the Weber function, relevant to analytic number theory. Jν (z) and Yν (z) are often referred to as the Bessel function of the first kind and of the second kind, respectively. Equally relevant to number theory are modified Bessel functions. The modified Bessel function Iν (z) of the first kind is defined by Iν (z) =

z ν+2n 1 , n! Γ(ν + n + 1) 2 n=0 ∞ X

(6.9)

whence In (z) = i−n Jn (iz) for n ∈ Z. The modified Bessel function Kν (z) of the second kind is defined by Kν (z) =

π I−ν (z) − Iν (z) 2 sin πν

(6.10)

(the limit is to be taken for ν ∈ Z), which has the integral representation Z π 1 ∞ − 12 z(t+ 1t ) ν−1 1 Kν (z) = (6.11) e t dt, Re ν > − , | arg z| < . 2 0 2 4 This appears in the proof of Theorem 6.1 in the context of Mellin inversion (sometimes referred to as the inverse Heaviside integral) Z √ µ 1 µ+ν µ−ν Γ s+ Γ s+ x−s ds = 2 x 2 Kν 2 x , (6.12) 2πi (c) 2 2

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

109

for c + Re µ+ν 2 ≥ Re ν > 0. Bessel functions are, in a sense, generalizations of exponential functions, and they reduce to these functions for half-integral order, e.g. r r 2 2 J 21 (z) = sin(z), J− 12 (z) = cos(z) (6.13) πz πz and K 21 (z) = K− 21 (z) = 6.2

r

π −z e . 2z

(6.14)

The theory of Epstein zeta-functions

We now introduce the notation (from Terras [Ter1]) concerning the Epstein zeta-functions, which will be used throughout in what follows. Notation. Let g, h ∈ Rn be n-dimensional real vectors which (in the first place) give rise to the perturbation and the (additive) characters, respectively. Let Y = (yij ) be a positive definite n × n real symmetric matrix. Define the Epstein zeta-function associated to the quadratic form Y [a] = a · Y a = t aY a =

n X

yij ai aj ,

(6.15)

i,j=1

where a = (a1 , . . . , an ) ∈ Rn and “·” means the scalar product, by Z(Y, 0, 0, s) =

X

a∈Zn a6=0

1 , Y [a]s

σ>

n , 2

(6.16)

where σ = Re s. For g, h ∈ Rn define the general Epstein zeta-function (of HurwitzLerch type) by Z(Y, g, h, s) =

X

a∈Zn a+g6=0

e2πih·a , Y [a + g]s

σ>

n , 2

(6.17)

and incorporate the completion Λ(Y, g, h, s) = π −s Γ(s) Z(Y, g, h, s),

(6.18)

March 27, 2007

17:14


110

vista


which satisfies the functional equation of the form (5.63) with an additional factor and replacement of parameters (proof given in §6.4): n 1 e−2πig·h Λ Y −1 , h, −g, − s . Λ(Y, g, h, s) = p (6.19) 2 |Y | In what follows we always denote the special vector t 12 , 21 , 21 by c0 : 1 2

  c0 =  12  . 1 2

We shall now give some illustrative examples. Example 6.1 The relationship between the Madelung constants of the NaCl and CsCl structure. In [Hautot, p.1724], it is stated that the cations of CsCl are at a ∈ 3 3 1 2 √ √2 Z . The Madelung constant Z + and anions are at a ∈ 2 3 3 MCsCl is defined, in the first place, by √ √ 3 X 3 X −1 MCsCl = |a + c0 | − |a|−1 , (6.20) 2 2 3 3 a∈Z

a∈Z a6=0

which, in our notation above, is √ √ 1 1 3 3 Z I, c0 , 0, Z I, 0, 0, − 2 2 2 2

(6.21)

and is in turn equal to √

1 − 3 Z B, 0, c0 , 2

,

(6.22)

where 

and

10 I = 0 1 00

 0 0 1 

(identity matrix),

 3 −1 −1 B = −1 3 −1 . −1 −1 3

(6.23)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

111

Hautot [Hautot], without giving any reasons, transforms (6.20) into the form 2 √ MCsCl = 2MN aCl 3 −1/2 X X X 2 2 2 (2l) + (2m + 1) + (2n + 1) +6 (6.24) −1/2 − (2l)2 + (2m + 1)2 + (2n)2 ,

and then proceeds to transfer the triple sum using the Schl¨ omilch series technique (cf. [KTZ] also). Thus (6.24) suggests that there may be a relationship between MN aCl and MCsCl structure. This suggestion is strengthened by the comparison of numerical values MN aCl = 1.74756459463 . . ., MCsCl = 1.76267477307 . . ..

(6.25)

The real situation is the following duality relations (6.26) and (6.27), which can be found only through the study of lattice structures. Between the Madelung constants MN aCl = −Z(I, 0, c0 , 21 ) and MCsCl √ = − 3 Z(B, 0, c0 , 12 ), the duality relations hold (under the notation (6.23)): 2 1 MN aCl = −Z I, 0, c0 , = − {Z(B, 0, 0, 1) − Z(B, 0, c0 , 1)} (6.26) 2 π and

√ √ 1 3 =− MCsCl = − 3 Z B, 0, c0 , {Z(I, 0, 0, 1) − Z(I, 0, c0 , 1)} 2 2π (6.27) (cf. Formula (1.8) on p.721 of [KTTY1]; proof given in Example 6.2 below). In the case of MZnS , Hautot states another relation corresponding to (6.24), again without giving any reason why the Madelung constants MZnS and MCsCl should be related: XXX 1 2 4 √ MZnS = √ MCsCl − 6 p , 2 3 3 (2l) + (2m + 1)2 + (2n + 1)2 (6.28) where we note that the Madelung constant MZnS is to be defined by √ √ 1 1 1 3 3 Z A, c0 , 0, Z A, 0, 0, MZnS = − , (6.29) 2 2 2 2 2

March 27, 2007

17:14

112


vista


where 

21 A = 1 2 11

 1 1 . 2

(6.30)

Comparing (6.27) and (6.29) and the numerical values (6.25) and (6.31) below does not give much to expect a relation between them; MZnS = 1.63805505338 . . .. Surprisingly enough, there holds a remarkable relation √ 1 3 MN aCl + MCsCl . MZnS = 4 2

(6.31)

(6.32)

For a proof see [KTTY2]. In Example 6.2 we are going to reveal those identities given in Example 6.1 as special cases of zeta-function relations. We introduce the general principle. Principle. Suppose L is a lattice with basis e1 , e2 , e3 : L = Ze1 ⊕ Ze2 ⊕ Ze3 .

(6.33)

With M = (e1 , e2 , e3 ), the associated Gram matrix Y is defined by t M M :   e1 · e 1 e1 · e 2 e1 · e 3 Y = t M M = e2 · e1 e2 · e2 e2 · e3  . (6.34) e3 · e 1 e3 · e 2 e3 · e 3 Let f 1 = e2 + e3 , f 2 = e3 + e1 , f 3 = e1 + e2 , and   011 J = 1 0 1 . 110

(6.35)

Then the matrix tJ Y J = J Y J is the Gram matrix associated to the sublattice L1 = Zf 1 ⊕ Zf 2 ⊕ Zf 3 of L, and we have 1 1 1 (6.36) L = L 1 ∪ L1 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 . 2 2 2 We appeal to the fact to be proved in §6.3 (Proposition 6.3) that the zeta-function of a lattice coincides with the Epstein zeta-function of the

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

113

corresponding Gram matrix under suitable identification. It follows that Λ(Y, 0, c0 , s) = Λ tJ Y J, 0, 0, s − Λ tJ Y J, c0 , 0, s , (6.37) and

Λ(Y, 0, 0, s) = Λ tJ Y J, 0, 0, s + Λ tJ Y J, c0 , 0, s .

(6.37)0

Now note that the inverse matrix (tJ Y J)−1 is the Gram matrix associated to the dual lattice L01 (∼ = Hom(L1 , Z)) or recall the functional equation (6.19) to transform the right-hand side of (6.37) further into 1 3 3 p Λ (tJ Y J)−1 , 0, 0, −s − Λ (tJ Y J)−1 , 0, −c0 , −s , 2 2 |tJ Y J|

so that

Λ(Y, 0, c0 , s) 1 =p t | J Y J|

3 3 t −1 t −1 Λ ( J Y J) , 0, 0, −s − Λ ( J Y J) , 0, −c0 , −s . 2 2 (6.38)

Now we apply the above principle to some lattice sums.   211 Example 6.2 First choose tJ Y J = A = 1 2 1 ((6.30)). Then Y = I 112 and (6.37) reads Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = Z(A, 0, 0, s) − Z(A, c0 , 0, s).

(6.39)

This explains the reason why the proper definition (given in [KTTY2]) of the Madelung constant MN aCl as the value at s = 21 of Z(A, c0 , 0, s) − Z(A, 0, 0, s) coincides with the value at s = 12 of −Z(I, 0, c0 , s) i.e. 1 1 1 MN aCl = Z A, c0 , 0, − Z A, 0, 0, = −Z I, 0, c0 , . 2 2 2 Next, we choose Y = 14 B ((6.23)). Then tJ Y J = I, and 1 B, 0, c0 , s = Z(I, 0, 0, s) − Z(I, c0 , 0, s). Z 4

(6.40)

(6.41)

March 27, 2007

114

17:14


vista


We make an important remark, which will be in effect in treating the Abel mean in [KTTY2], that for c > 0 Z(c Y, g, h, s) = c−s Z(Y, g, h, s),

(6.42)

i.e. we may incorporate the parameter c in Y by just multiplying by the factor c−s . Using (6.42) and (6.41), we have for s = 21 √ √ 1 1 3 1 Z I, c0 , 0, − Z I, 0, 0, = − 3 Z B, 0, c0 , , (6.43) 2 2 2 2 which asserts that (6.21) and (6.22) are equal. We turn to the proof of duality relations (6.26) and (6.27). As we deduced (6.39), we choose tJ Y J = A, and so Y = I. Then (6.38) gives 3 1 3 Λ A−1 , 0, −c0 , − s − Λ A−1 , 0, 0, − s −Λ(I, 0, c0 , s) = p . 2 2 |A| Since A−1 = 41 B, we apply (6.42) to obtain 3 3 1 3 −s 2 Λ B, 0, −c0 , − s − Λ B, 0, 0, − s , −Λ(I, 0, c0 , s) = 4 2 2 2

or − π −s Γ(s) Z(I, 0, c0 , s) (6.44) 3 3 3 2−2s −( 23 −s) =2 π Γ −s Z B, 0, −c0 , − s − Z B, 0, 0, − s , 2 2 2 which in turn gives (6.26) for s = 12 . Also, for the choice Y = 14 B, tJ Y J = I, (6.38) reads, as in (6.43), 3 3 −s Λ I, 0, 0, − s − Λ I, 0, −c0 , − s Λ(B, 0, c0 , s) = 4 , 2 2 or π −s Γ(s) Z(B, 0, c0 , s) (6.45) 3 3 3 3 = 4−s π −( 2 −s) Γ −s Z I, 0, 0, − s − Z I, 0, −c0 , − s , 2 2 2 which gives (6.27) for s = 12 .

March 27, 2007

17:14



6.3

vista

115

Lattice zeta-functions

In this section we shall clarify the relationship between the zeta-functions mentioned in the title and apply to the study of Madelung constants. Let L be a lattice, i.e. a free Abelian group of finite rank (n, say) with biadditive form ( , )L . We form the zeta-function ZL (s) = Z(L, 0, 0, s) corresponding to (6.16) by X 1 , (6.46) ZL (s) = Z(L, 0, 0, s) = (x, x)sL x∈L x6=0

absolutely convergent for σ > n2 . If, in particular, L ⊂ Rm and (a, b)L means the scalar product a · b = Pm t ab = i=1 ai bi , then X 1 . (6.47) Z(L, 0, 0, s) = (x21 + · · · + x2m )s x∈L x6=0

As usual, let L0 denote the dual lattice of L: L0 = Hom(L, Z). Then for lattice elements p, q with real coefficients, p ∈ L ⊗ R, q ∈ L0 ⊗ R, we introduce the general lattice zeta-function Z(L, p, q, s) corresponding to (6.17) by Z(L, p, q, s) =

X

x∈L x+p6=0

absolutely convergent for σ > through

n 2.

e2πiq(x) , (x + p, x + p)sL⊗R

(6.48)

Here we understand the meaning of q(x)

L0 ⊗ R ∼ = Hom(L, R) ∼ = HomR (L ⊗ R, R) and the completion corresponding to (6.18): Λ(L, p, q, s) = π −s Γ(s) Z(L, p, q, s).

(6.49)

We recall the Principle in §1 in the following form. Associated to a lattice L with basis e1 , . . . , en , L = Ze1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Zen , is its Gram matrix   (e1 · e1 )L · · · (e1 · en )L   .. .. .. (6.50) Y = tM M =  , . . . (en · e1 )L · · · (en · en )L

March 27, 2007

17:14


116

vista


where M = (e1 , . . . , en ). Let φ be the canonical isomorphism φ : Zn −→ L, x = φ(a) = a1 e1 + · · · + an en ,

(6.51)

for a = (a1 , . . . , an ), or φ(a) = M a. Through φ, we may interpret the bilinear form (x, x)L as (φ(a), φ(a))L , which we may think of as Y [a]. Thus, ZL (s) = Z(L, 0, 0, s) = Z(Y, 0, 0, s).

(6.52)

We may extend φ to the isomorphism φ : Rn −→ L ⊗ R, x = φ(a) = a1 e1 + · · · + an en , for a = (a1 , . . . , an ) ∈ Rn . Then we have (φ(a), φ(a))L⊗R = Y [a]. If further we put p = φ(g) and q(x) = q ◦ φ(a) = h · a (a ∈ Rn ), then Z(L, p, q, s) =

X

e2πiq◦φ(a) (φ(a + g), φ(a + g))sL⊗R

X

e2πih·a = Z(Y, g, h, s). Y [a + g]s

a∈Zn a+g6=0

=

a∈Zn a+g6=0

(6.53)

Thus, we have Proposition 6.3

Under above notation, we have Λ(L, p, q, s) = Λ(Y, g, h, s).

Hence, whenever we speak about a lattice zeta-function, we may do well with the corresponding Epstein zeta-function with the Gram matrix.

Example 6.3

(i) The simple cubic (s.c.) structure, Z3

  1 = Z 0 ⊕ 0

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

117


      100 0 0 Z 1 ⊕ Z 0 with Gram matrix I = 0 1 0. The zeta-function is 001 1 0 X Z Z3 , 0, 0, s = Z(I, 0, 0, s) =

3

a∈Z a6=0

Fig. 6.1

1 . |a|2s

(6.54)

the simple cubic (s.c.) structure

(ii) The face-centered cubic structure (f.c.c.),       0 1 1 n o Lf = a ∈ Z3 (−1)a1 +a2 +a3 = 1 = Z 1 ⊕ Z 0 ⊕ Z 1 1 1 0 

 211 with Gram matrix A = 1 2 1 ((6.30)). 112 The zeta-function is

ZLf (s) = Z(A, 0, 0, s) X 1 . = 2 2 2 (2a1 + 2a2 + 2a3 + 2a1 a2 + 2a2 a3 + 2a3 a1 )s 3 a∈Z a6=0

With c0 = t ( 21 , 12 , 12 ), Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = as

P

a∈Z3 a6=0

(−1)a1 +a2 +a3 I[a]s

Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = 2Z(A, 0, 0, s) − Z(I, 0, 0, s).

can be written

March 27, 2007

17:14


118

vista


Solving in Z(A, 0, 0, s), we have

Z(A, 0, 0, s) =

Fig. 6.2

1 (Z(I, 0, 0, s) + Z(I, 0, c0 , s)) . 2

the face-centered cubic structure (f.c.c.)

(iii) The body-centered cubic structure (b.c.c.), Lb = a ∈ Z3 |a2 + a3 , a3 + a1 , a1 + a2 ∈ 2Z = a ∈ Z3 |(−1)a2 +a3 + (−1)a3 +a1 + (−1)a1 +a2 = 3 

 3 −1 −1 with Gram matrix B = −1 3 −1 ((6.23)). The zeta-function is −1 −1 3 ZLb (s) = Z(B, 0, 0, s) X 1 = 2 + 3a2 + 3a2 − 2a a − 2a a − 2a a )s . (3a 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 a∈Z a6=0

(6.55)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

119

Since       1 1 1 0 2 2 2       3 Z I, 0, 12 , s = Z I, 0, 21 , s + Z I, 0, 0 , s + Z I, 0, 12 , s 1 1 0 0 2 2 X (−1)a2 +a3 + (−1)a3 +a1 + (−1)a1 +a2 , = I[a]s 3 a∈Z a6=0

we get, on resorting to the definition of Lb ,   1 X X 3 −1  21  + 3 Z I, 0, 2 , s = s s I[a] I[a] a∈Lb a∈Z3 −Lb 0 a6=0

= 4 Z(B, 0, 0, s) − Z(I, 0, 0, s),

whence

Z(B, 0, 0, s) =

Fig. 6.3

  1

4 

Z(I, 0, 0, s) +

 



1    21  . 3 Z I, 0, 2 , s 

0



the body-centered cubic structure (b.c.c.)

(6.56)

March 27, 2007

17:14


120

vista


Using ‘square root’ of A and B, i.e. J from (6.35) and 

 −1 1 1 K =  1 −1 1  1 1 −1

(6.57)

(J 2 = A, K 2 = B, J −1 = 21 K), we obtain generalizations of formulas (6.55) and (6.56): Z(J Y J, g, h, s)  1   2    1 1 −1 −1 = Z(Y, Jg, J h, s) + Z Y, Jg, J h +  2 , s  2   1

(6.58)

2

Z(KY K, g, h, s)     0  1 1 −1 −1 Z(Y, Kg, K h, s) + Z Y, Kg, K h +  2 , s = 4  1

(6.59)

2

   1   2 2   −1 −1 . + Z Y, Kg, K h +  0 , s + Z Y, Kg, K h +  12 , s  1  0 2 1

Example 6.4 For the notation and more details, cf. [KTTY2]. (i) The N aCl (Sodium Chloride) structure. Here the data is n+ = n− = 1, S++ = S−− = a ∈ Z3 |a1 + a2 + a3 ∈ 2Z (f.c.c.), S+− = S+− = a ∈ Z3 |a1 + a2 + a3 ∈ 2Z + 1 (f.c.c.), so that by (6.40) ZN aCl (s) = Z(A, c0 , 0, s) − Z(A, 0, 0, s) = −Z(I, 0, c0 , s).

Formula (6.60) justifies the first equality in (6.26).

(6.60)

March 27, 2007

17:14



Fig. 6.4

vista

121

the N aCl (Sodium Chloride) structure (s.c.)

Thus, by (6.40), the Madelung constant MN aCl is given by

1 MN aCl = −Z I, 0, c0 , 2 X (−1)a1 +a2 +a3 = 1.7475645849 . . . =− |a| 3 a∈Z a6=0

as stated in (6.25) and (6.26).

(6.61)

March 27, 2007

17:14


122

vista


(ii) The CsCl (Caesium Chloride) structure. Here the data is n+ = n− = 1,

S+− = S+−

3 2 √ Z (s.c.), 3 3 1 2 √ Z+ = (s.c.), 2 3

S++ = S−− =

and the zeta-function is, as discussed in Example 6.2, (6.41)–(6.43), 4 4 I, c0 , 0, s − Z I, 0, 0, s ZCsCl (s) = Z 3 3 s s 3 3 = Z(I, c0 , 0, s) − Z(I, 0, 0, s) 4 4 = −3s Z(B, 0, c0 , s).

Fig. 6.5

the CsCl (Caesium Chloride) structure (b.c.c.)

(6.62)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

123

Hence MCsCl

√

√ 1 1 3 3 = − Z I, c0 , 0, Z I, 0, 0, 2 2 2 2 √ 1 = − 3 Z B, 0, c0 , 2

(6.63)

as in (6.43), whence (6.27) ensues. (iii) The ZnS (Zincblende) structure. The data is n+ = n− = 1, S++ = S−− S+− = S+−

) 2 3 = √ a a ∈ Z , a1 + a2 + a3 ∈ 2Z (f.c.c.), 3 ) ( 3 2 1 1 (f.c.c.), = √ a a∈ Z+ , a1 + a 2 + a 3 ∈ 2 Z + 2 2 3 (

=

Fig. 6.6

the ZnS (Zincblende) structure (diamond)

March 27, 2007

124

17:14


vista


and the zeta-function is 4 4 1 A, c0 , 0, s − Z A, 0, 0, s ZZnS (s) = Z 3 2 3 s s 3 1 3 = Z A, c0 , 0, s − Z(A, 0, 0, s) , 4 2 4

(6.64)

i.e. (6.29). Further in a similarly way as we prove (6.67) in [KTTY2], we may prove s 1 3 1 (6.65) ZZnS (s) = ZN aCl (s) + ZCsCl (s), 2 4 2 whence as in (6.32) and (6.31) MZnS

√ 3 1 MN aCl + MCsCl = 4 2 = 1.63805805338 . . ..

(6.66)

(iv) The CaF2 (Fluorite) structure. The data: n+ = 1, n− = 2, ) ( 2 3 S++ = √ a a ∈ Z , a1 + a2 + a3 ∈ 2Z (f.c.c.), 3 3 1 2 (s.c.) Z+ S+− = √ 2 3 3 2 S−− = √ Z (s.c.) 3 ) ( 3 1 1 2 , a1 + a2 + a3 ∈ 2Z + (f.c.c.). S−+ = √ a a ∈ Z + 2 2 3

The zeta-function is 1 4 4 ZCaF2 (s) = Z I, c0 , 0, s − 2 Z A, 0, 0, s 2 3 3 4 4 1 1 A, c0 , 0, s − Z I, 0, 0, s 2Z + 2 3 2 3 s s 1 3 1 3 = Z(I, c0 , 0, s) − Z(I, 0, 0, s) 2 4 2 4 s s 3 1 3 + Z A, c0 , 0, s − Z(A, 0, 0, s), 4 2 4

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

125

=

Fig. 6.7

the CaF2 (Fluorite) structure

for which the following is proved in Example 6.1. s 1 3 ZCaF2 (s) = ZN aCl (s) + ZCsCl (s), 2 4

(6.67)

whence MCaF2

6.4

√ 3 = MN aCl + MCsCl 4 = 2.51939243992 . . ..

(6.68)

Bessel series expansions for Epstein zeta-functions

In this section we shall prove a Bessel series expansion of Chowla-Selberg type (Theorem 6.2) for the Epstein zeta-function Λ(Y, g, h, s) corresponding to a block decomposition of the matrix Y . The proof depends on another Bessel series expansion (Theorem 6.1) for the generalized Epstein zetaP e2πih·a function a∈Zn (Y [a+g]+b) s for b > 0, which is interesting in its own right

March 27, 2007

17:14


126

vista


and which we call the Mellin-Barnes type, being dependent on the MellinBarnes integrals. As a corollary to Theorem 6.1, we shall prove the Benson-Mackenzie formula (Corollary 6.1), and for applications of Theorem 6.2, we refer to [KTTY2]. Theorem 6.1 (Mellin-Barnes type formula) above, we have for b > 0,

Notation being as

X

e2πih·a (Y [a + g] + b)s a∈Zn r s− n 2 p −1 [a + h] X 2 Y =p Ks− n2 2 Y −1 [a + h]b π e−2πig·(a+h) b |Y | n

π −s Γ(s)

a∈Z a+h6=0

1 Γ(s − n2 ) 1 + δ(h) p n n , |Y | π s− 2 bs− 2

(6.69)

where Ks (z) signifies the modified Bessel function of the second kind defined by (6.10). Proof. This is Formula (1.25) [KTY7] with the term ε(g)(πb)−s Γ(s) incorporated in the left-side member. There the proof depended on the modular relation, i.e. the Poisson summation modified so as to suit the case. We refer to Terras for a similar but subtler proof using the Poisson summation formula. We may deduce (6.69) from the functional equation (6.19) via the Mellin-Barnes integral Z 1 Γ(s − z) Γ(z) −z (1 + x)−s = x dz (6.70) 2πi (c) Γ(s) for x > 0, 0 < c < σ, which has been used extensively in various context (cf. e.g. [KTZ], [KTTY1], [Matsumoto] and [PK]). The proof starts from expressing the sum in the form of the integral (6.70), applying the functional equation, and then finally appealing to (6.12). Corollary 6.1 (Benson-Mackenzie (cf. Borweins’ [Bor])) Let as 1   ! 100 2 1 1 0   2 1 , c1 = 1 . Then we before I = 0 1 0, c0 =  2  and I2 = 01 2 1 001 2

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

127


have 6 π s+1 Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = Γ(s + 1)

X

X

2

b (−1)

2 a∈(Z+ 12 ) b∈Z b6=0

b

r

s

p I2 [a] 2π 2 I K [a]b s 2 b2 (6.71)

and

1 Z I, 0, c0 , 2

= −12π

Since for σ >

Proof.

∞ ∞ X X

sech

a1 = 21 a2 = 21

q

a21

+

a22

π

2

,

(6.72)

3 2

Z(I, 0, c0 , s) =

X (−1)a1 +a2 +a3 (a2 + a2 + a2 ) 1 2 3 , (a21 + a22 + a23 )s+1 3

a∈Z a6=0

we may write Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = 3

XX

b∈Z a∈Z2 b6=0

(−1)a1 +a2 +b b2 , (a21 + a22 + b2 )s+1

whence Z(I, 0, c0 , s) = 3

X

2

b (−1)

b

X

a∈Z2

b∈Z b6=0

e2πic1 ·a (I2 [a] + b2 )s+1

!

.

(6.73)

We apply Theorem 6.1 to the inner sum on the right of (6.73) to obtain Z(I, 0, c0 , s) =3

X b∈Z b6=0

2 π s+1 X b (−1) Γ(s + 1) 2 2

b

a∈Z

r

! s p I2 [a + c1 ] 2 , Ks 2 I2 [a + c1 ]b π b2 (6.74)

which is (6.71).

March 27, 2007

17:14


128

vista


Now put s = 21 and recall Formula (6.14) to deduce that p X X 1 |b| (−1)b exp −2 I2 [a] |b| π Z I, 0, c0 , = 6π 2 1 2 a∈(Z+ 2 ) b∈Z b6=0 ∞ X X

= 12 π

a∈(Z+ 21 )2 b=1

(6.75)

b p b − exp −2 I2 [a] π

The inner sum can be evaluated to be p q 2 − exp −2 I2 [a] π 1 , sech a21 + a22 π p 2 = − 4 1 + exp −2 I2 [a] π

2 a1 ∈ Z + 21 . Hence, splitting the sum over a1 , a2 into 4 parts, we a2 conclude (6.72), completing the proof. a=

To state Theorem 6.2, we introduce new notation. A B be a block decomposition with A an n × n matrix Let Y = t BC and B an m × m matrix. Set D = C − t BA−1 B. In accordance with this decomposition, we decompose the vectors g = g1 h1 ,h = , g 1 , h1 ∈ Z n , g 2 , h2 ∈ Z m . g2 h2 Theorem 6.2 (generalized Chowla-Selberg type formula cf. [Ter1, Example 4, p.208]) Under the above notation, we have Λ(Y, g, h, s)

(6.76) 1 n = δ(g 2 ) e−2πig2 ·h2 Λ(A, g 1 , h1 , s) + δ(h1 ) p Λ D, g 2 , h2 , s − 2 |A| −2πig 1 ·h1 X X −1 2e p + e2πi(−g1 ·a+h2 ·b) e−2πiA B(b+g2 )·(a+h1 ) |A| a∈Zn b∈Zm ×

s

a+h1 6=0 b+g 2 6=0

A−1 [a

+ h1 ] D[b + g 2 ]

s− n 2

p Ks− n2 2 A−1 [a + h1 ] D[b + g 2 ] π .

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

129


Proof. The case g = h = 0, n = m = 1 is due to Chowla and Selberg [CS], [SC] (cf. also Bateman and Grosswald [BG]), the case m = 1 is due to Berndt [Ber6] and the general case with g = h = 0 is due to Terras [Ter1]. The proof in our most general case runs as follows. Noting that X

Λ(Y, g, h, s) = π −s Γ(s)

a∈Zn ,b∈Zm (a+g 1 ,b+g 2 )6=0

e2πi(h1 ·a+h2 ·b) , Y [(a + g 1 , b + g 2 )]s

we distinguish three cases: b + g 2 = 0 (g 2 = 0 or not) and b + g 2 6= 0: X

Λ(Y, g, h, s) = δ(g 2 ) π −s Γ(s)

a∈Zn a+g 1 6=0

X

+ π −s Γ(s)

X

e2πi(h1 ·a−h2 ·g2 ) Y [(a + g 1 , 0)]s

b∈Zm a∈Zn b+g 2 6=0

(6.77)

e2πi(h1 ·a+h2 ·b) . Y [(a + g 1 , b + g 2 )]s

We now apply the formula Y [(a, b)] = A[a + A−1 Bb] + D[b],

a ∈ Z n , b ∈ Zm

(6.78)

to transform (6.77) into Λ(Y, g, h, s) = δ(g 2 ) π −s Γ(s) e−2πih2 ·g2

+ π −s Γ(s)

X

m

X

a∈Zn a+g 1 6=0

e2πih2 ·b

b∈Z b+g 2 6=0

X

a∈Zn

e2πih1 ·a A[(a + g 1 ]s

(A[a+g1

(6.79) e2πih1 ·a

+A−1 B(b+g

2 )]+D[b+g 2 ])

s

.

The first sum on the right of (6.79) is Λ(A, g 1 , h1 , s) and to the inner sum in the second term, we apply Theorem 6.1. Then the second term on

March 27, 2007

17:14


130


the right of (6.79) becomes X 2 e2πih2 ·b p |A| b∈Zm ,b6=0 b+g 2 6=0

× +

s

A−1 [a + h1 ] D[b + g 2 ]

X

b∈Zm b+g 2 6=0

e

2πih2 ·b

s− n 2

X

e−2πi(g1 +A

−1

B(b+g 2 ))·(a+h1 )

n

a∈Z a+h1 6=0

p −1 Ks− n2 2π A [a + h1 ] D[b + g 2 ]

δ(h1 ) p

Γ s−

|A| D[b + g 2

n 2 n n ] s− 2 π s− 2

,

which are the third and second terms on the right of (6.76), whence the result follows.

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

Chapter 7

Fourier series and Fourier transforms

Abstract This chapter contains elementary facts about Fourier series and transforms; Theorem 7.2 gives sufficient conditions for a Fourier series to converge to the given function f (t), i.e. that f (t) is piecewise of C 1 , which is superfluous but sufficient for most of the purpose. In the proof the Fourier series (7.9) for the first periodic Bernoulli polynomial B 1 (x) is essentially used. Because of its importance, we give two different proofs for (7.9), one by Theorem 7.2, the other by Abel’s and Dirichlet’s theorem in Appendix B. Regarding integral transforms, we emphasize the case of complex Fourier transforms (and its equivalent form, the Laplace and Mellin transforms). The reader can familiarize oneself with many worked-out concrete examples. This chapter can be read parallel to Chapter 8.

7.1

Fourier series

Suppose f is a periodic function with period 2T (T > 0) and integrable over [−T, T ], and that the procedures made below are all valid. In analogy with the Laurent expansion (=the Taylor expansion with P∞ denominator) n=−∞ cn z n , we wish to express f (t) in terms of a series π in ei T t : ∞ X

n=−∞

π

cn ei T t

n

=

131

∞ X

n=−∞

cn ei

nπ T t

,

(7.1)

March 27, 2007

17:14

132


vista


called the Fourier series S[f ] of f . We want to determine the coefficients cn . Integrate the series term by term, thereby noting that ( Z T 1, n = 0 1 t i nπ e T dt = 2T −T 0, n 6= 0, nπ

the orthogonality of the sequence {ei T t }n∈Z of complex exponentials, we conclude that Z T Z T ∞ X (m−n)π 1 1 t −i nπ T cm dt = f (t) e ei T t dt = cn . 2T −T 2T −T m=−∞ Thus the n-th Fourier coefficient of f should be defined as Z T 1 nπ cn = f (t) e−i T t dt, 2T −T

(7.2)

and we may express the Fourier series of f which we denote by S[f ], as a complex exponential series, in the form ∞ X

S[f ] =

cn ei

nπ T t

cn ei

nπ T t

.

(7.3)

n=−∞

We then write f (t) ∼

Sn (t) =

∞ X

.

n=−∞

n X

k=−n

kπ

ck ei T t ,

(n ∈ N)

(7.4)

is called the n-th partial sum. Many of the results in the theory of Fourier series may be treated, from a more general standpoint, as those for the orthogonal systems in a vector space. In view of this fact and in anticipation of future progress, let us try to develops a method based on linear algebra. Needless to say, one can come to the same conclusions by direct computation of integrals. Definition 7.1 The set V of all complex-valued piecewise continuous periodic functions f with period 2T forms a complex vector space. In V

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

133

we define the positive semidefinite Hermitian form Z T 1 (f, g) = f (t) g(t) dt 2T −T (cf. Exercise 7.1). (Note that we take the complex conjugationpof g). Then V becomes a semi-normed complex vector space with kf k = (f, f ) as its semi-norm (length). If (f, g) = 0, then we say that f and g are orthogonal and write f ⊥g. A subset S ⊂ V consisting of vectors of positive length is called an orthogonal system if for ∀f, g ∈ S, f 6= g, we have f ⊥g. An orthogonal system with all its vectors having length 1 is called an orthonormal system (ONS). Namely, S ⊂ V is an orthonormal system if and only if ( 1, f = g . (f, g) = 0, f 6= g An orthonormal system S ⊂ V is called a complete orthonormal system if an addition of one vector having positive length invalidates the orthogonality, or in other words, S is a complete system if and only if an element f of V is orthogonal to all elements of S, then kf k = 0. Exercise 7.1 Prove that (f, g) defined above satisfies the conditions (i)— (iv) of the positive semidefinite Hermitian form. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

(f, f ) ≥ 0; (f, f ) = 0 ⇔ f (t) ≡ 0 (save for discontinuities) (f, g) = (g, f ) (f + g, h) = (f, h) + (g, h), (f, g + h) = (f, g) + (f, h) ¯ (f, g) (λ ∈ C) (λf, g) = λ (f, g), (f, λg) = λ

Example 7.1

An example of an orthonormal system. n nπ o exp i t T n∈Z

is a complete orthonormal system in V . Indeed, we may directly check that Z T Z T mπ nπ (m − n) 1 1 exp i exp i t exp i t dt = t dt = δmn . 2T −T T T 2T −T T

Lemma 7.1 If {ϕ1 , . . . , ϕn } ⊂ V (ϕi 6= ϕj for i 6= j) is an orthonormal system, then for any c1 , . . . , cn ∈ C, we have

2

n n

X X

|ck |2 . c k ϕk =

k=1

k=1

March 27, 2007

17:14


134

vista


Exercise 7.2

Prove Lemma 7.1.

Lemma 7.2 Let {ϕ1 , . . . , ϕn } ⊂ V (ϕi 6= ϕj for i 6= j) be an orthonormal system and for any f ∈ V , put ck = (f, ϕk ). Then we have

2 n n

X X

|ck |2 . ck ϕk = kf k2 −

f −

k=1

k=1

From Exercise 7.1 and Lemma 7.1 it follows that ! n n X X LHS = f − c k ϕk , f − c k ϕk

Proof.

k=1

2

= kf k −

n X k=1

k=1

ck (ϕk , f ) −

n X k=1

2

n

X

ck ϕk = RHS. c¯k (f, ϕk ) +

k=1

Corollary 7.1 (Bessel’s inequality) Let {ϕj }j∈J ⊂ V (ϕi 6= ϕj for i 6= j) be an orthonormal system and for any f ∈ V , put cj = (f, ϕj ). Then cj = 0 except for countably many j and we have X 2 2 |cj | ≤ kf k . j∈J

In particular, we have

P

j∈J

2

|cj | < ∞.

Remark 7.1 cj = (f, ϕj ) is called the j-th Fourier coefficient of f with respect to the ONS {ϕj }j∈J . Corollary 7.2 If f is a continuous periodic function of period 2T and is piecewise of class C 1 , then for the Fourier coefficients (7.2) of f , the estimate ∞ π2 X 2 2 n |cn |2 ≤ kf 0 k < ∞ T 2 n=1

holds. Proof. f 0 being piecewise continuous, belongs to V and therefore for its Fourier coefficients Z T 1 nπ γn = f 0 (t) e−i T t dt, 2T −T

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

135

we have Bessel’s inequality ∞ X

n=1

2

2

|γn | ≤ kf 0 k .

(7.5)

Integrating by parts, thereby using the periodicity of f , we get Z nπ nπ T inπ T nπ 1 γn = c n, f (t) e−i T t dt = i f (t) e−i T t −T + 2 2T 2T −T T whence, substituting these in (7.5), we conclude the assertion. Exercise 7.3

Compute the right-hand side of Z T 2 |f (t) − Sn (t)| dt −T

with the aid of Exercise 7.2 and give a direct proof of Bessel’s inequality in Corollary 7.1. Now we shall express (7.3) in a trigonometric form: We write cn =

1 (an − i bn ) 2

(n ∈ Z),

with a−n = an , b0 = 0, b−n = −bn

(n ∈ N),

Definition 7.2 Let f be a periodic function of period 2T (T > 0) f (t + 2T ) = f (t), t ∈ R. Then we call Z Z 1 T 1 T nπt nπt dt, bn = dt, 0 ≤ n ∈ Z an = f (t) cos f (t) sin T −T T T −T T (7.6) the n-th Fourier cosine coefficient and Fourier sine coefficient, respectively. We have ∞ ∞ X a0 X nπt nπt S[f ] = An (t) = (7.7) + an cos + bn sin 2 T T n=0 n=1 and Sn (t) =

n X

k=0

n a0 X kπt kπt Ak (t) = . + ak cos + bk sin 2 T T k=1

(7.8)

March 27, 2007

17:14


136


Exercise 7.4

Prove that an = cn + c−n , bn = i(cn − c−n )

and that (7.3) and (7.7) are equivalent. Exercise 7.5 Prove that if f is a periodic even [odd] function, then bn = 0 [an = 0] and that " # ∞ ∞ X a0 X nπt nπt S[f ] = . + S[f ] = bn sin an cos 2 T T n=1 n=1 This is called the Fourier cosine (respectively, the Fourier sine) series. Remark 7.2 Since f is a periodic function of period 2T , we may choose any interval of length 2T as the interval for integration to define the Fourier coefficients. We often use [−T, T ] or [0, 2T ]. Also, by the change of variable π t u = T t u = 2T , we may assume the period of f to be 2π [1]. Subsequently, we shall solely consider periodic functions of period 2T . The Fourier series S[f ] for f is just a trigonometrical (exponential) series formed from f and it is not known a priori whether it is convergent or, if convergent, whether it coincides with the original f (t). However, if f (t) is of good-natured, like piecewise smooth (cf. Theorem 7.1), then S[f ](t) converges to f (t) at the continuity points of f . Exercise 7.6

Define f (t) = t −

1 2

(0 < t < 1),

f (0) = f (1) = 0

and extend the domain of definition to all reals by continuing with period 1. / Z (the first Then find the Fourier series of f . Indeed, f (t) = B 1 (t), t ∈ periodic Bernoulli polynomial in Chapter 1). Solution Since this is the most fundamental, we shall compute the Fourier coefficients an , bn , and cn . By integration by parts, we have Z 1 1 an = 2 t− cos(2πnt) dt = 0, 2 0 bn = 2

Z 1 0

1 t− 2

sin(2πnt) dt = −

1 , πn

n ∈ N.

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

137

Similarly, the n-th Fourier coefficient cn (n 6= 0) is given by Z 1 cn = B 1 (x) e2πinx dx, 0

which by integration by parts becomes 1 Z 1 1 1 2πinx 1 1 − cn = x− e e2πinx dx = − i, 2πin 2 2πinx 2πn 0 0

or

an = 0, bn = −

1 , πn

as above. Hence f (t) ∼ −

∞ 1 X sin(2πnt) . π n=1 n

Since f is piecewise smooth, we should have the equality (by Theorem 7.1 below) f (t) = −

∞ 1 X sin(2πnt) , π n=1 n

∀t ∈ R.

Hence we have (1.9) in the case of n = 1, which we restate for convenience as ∞ 1 X sin 2πnx , x∈ / Z. B 1 (x) = − π n=1 n

(7.9)

Once (7.9) is established, it is quite easy to deduce Fourier expansion of other linear functions. E.g. consider the function f (x) defined as x − π for 0 ≤ x < 2π and continued to a periodic function of period 2π. Since x 2πB 1 = f (x), we immediately obtain 2π f (x) = −2

∞ X sin nx , x∈ / 2πZ. n n=1

(7.10)

Proposition 7.1 (The Riemann-Lebegues Lemma) Suppose f is piecewise continuous on the interval [a, b]. Then all of the following holds true: Z b Z b lim f (t) sin(Rt) dt = 0, lim f (t) cos(Rt) dt = 0, R→∞

a

R→∞

a

March 27, 2007

138

17:14



Fig. 7.1

Fig. 7.2

Fig. 7.3

lim

R→∞

Z

b

f (t) eiRt dt = 0. a

Proof. We may assume that f is continued on the whole interval [a, b] (Exercise 7.7). Then, being continuous on the compact set [a, b], f is bounded (Weierstrass’ Theorem), i.e. f (t) = O(1), t ∈ [a, b] and uniformly continuous, whence π f u+ − f (u) = o(1), R

R → ∞.

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

139

π , then We shall prove the first assertion. Putting t = u + R Z b Z b−π/R π I := f (t) sin(Rt) dt = − f u+ sin(Ru) du. R a a−π/R

Hence

Z

π f u+ sin(Ru) du R a−π/R Z b Z b−π/R π sin(Ru) du f (u) − f u + = f (u) sin(Ru) du + R b−π/R a Z a π f u+ − sin(Ru) du R a−π/R 1 1 + o(1) + O = o(1), R → ∞. =O R R

2I = I −

b−π/R

Exercise 7.7 (i) Divide [a, b] into subintervals to prove that the above proof can be reduced to the case where f (t) is continuous on the whole interval. (ii) Prove the remaining assertions of Proposition 7.1. Theorem 7.1 If f is a periodic function of period 2T and is piecewise smooth as well as continuous on any finite interval, then its Fourier series (7.3) converges to f (t) uniformly on any finite interval. Proof. First we show that {Sn } is convergent, where Sn = Sn (t) is the n-th partial sum defined by (7.4): For integers N > M > 0, we have N X 1 kπ i T t k ck e |SN − SM | = k |k|=M +1 v v u X u X u N u N 1 i kπ t 2 2 2 t ≤ k |ck | t e T k2 |k|=M +1 |k|=M +1 v u N u X 1 T 0 t ≤ kf k π k2 k=M +1

by the Canchy-Schwarz inequality and the Bessel inequality (Corollary 7.1). Hence |SN − SM | → 0 as N, M → ∞, and the Canchy criterion applies, ensuring the convergence of {Sn }. We now show that its limit is f (t).

March 27, 2007

17:14


140

vista


Recalling (7.3), we may express (7.4) as Z T n X kπ kπ 1 Sn = e−i T u ei T t f (u) du 2T −T k=−n Z T n 1 X i kπ (t−u) 1 f (u) du. e T = T −T 2 k=−n

Now the Dirichlet kernel is n

kπ 1 X + cos (t − u), 2 T k=1

sin n + 12 Tπ (t − u) which by Exercise 7.8, (2), . 2 sin Tπ t−u 2 Hence Z 1 T sin n + 12 Tπ (t − u) Sn (t) = f (u) du T −T 2 sin Tπ t−u 2 Z 1 T −t sin n + 21 Tπ v = f (t + v) dv T −T −t 2 sin Tπ v2 Z 1 T sin n + 12 Tπ u f (t + u) du = T −T 2 sin Tπ u2

(7.11)

by change of variable and the periodicity of f . R T sin(n+ 1 ) π u Subtracting f (t) = T1 −T 2 sin 2π uT f (t) du from (7.11) and using T 2

1

sin n + 2 sin Tπ u2

π Tu

=

sin n Tπ u cos Tπ sin Tπ u2

u 2

π + cos n u, T

we find that Sn (t) − f (t) =

1 2T

1 + 2T

Z Z

T −T T

π g(u, t) sin n u du T

π (f (u + t) − f (u)) cos n u du, T −T

where g(u, t) =

(f (u + t) − f (u)) cos Tπ sin Tπ u2

u 2

whose possible discontinuity, save for those of f , is at u = 0.

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

141

However, by the piecewise continuity of f 0 (t), f (u + t) − f (u) Tπ u2 cos Tπ u2 2T u sin Tπ u2 π  2T 0   f (t+), as u → 0+ π →   2T f 0 (t−), as u → 0 − . π

g(u, t) =

Hence g(u, t) is also piecewise continuous and the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma (Proposition 7.1) shows that lim Sn (t) = f (t).

n→∞

Theorem 7.2 If f is periodic of period 2T , piecewise continuous and piecewise of C 1 , then the Fourier series for f (t) converges to 12 (f (t+) + f (t−)). Proof. We may consider the case where 0 is the only discontinuity of f , other cases being reduced to this. Then the function F (t) = f (t) + (f (0+) − f (0−)) g(t) is piecewise of C 1 and continuous except possibly at 0, where ( t B 1 2T , t∈ / 2T Z g(t) = 0, t ∈ 2T Z. But lim F (t) = f (0−) +

t→0−

and lim F (t) = f (0+) −

t→0+

1 1 f (0+) − f (0−) = f (0+) + f (0−) 2 2 1 1 f (0+) − f (0−) = f (0+) − f (0−) , 2 2

and therefore F (t) is also continuous at 0. Hence we may apply Theorem 7.1 to conclude that F has the Fourier series which converges to F (t) everywhere. But g(t) has the Fourier series −

∞ 1 X sin Tπ nt π n=1 n

converging to g(t) everywhere (cf. Exercise 7.6).

March 27, 2007

17:14


142

vista


Hence it follows that f (t) also has the Fourier series converging to it at continuities and to F (0) = 21 (f (0+) − f (0−)), thereby completing the proof. Exercise 7.8

For x ∈ / Z prove that n X

e2πikx = eπi(n+1)x

k=1

sin πnx sin πx

(7.12)

and deduce from (7.12) that n X

cos 2πkx +

k=1

1 sin(2n + 1)πx = 2 2 sin πx

(7.13)

and n X

sin 2πkx = sin((n + 1)πx)

k=1

Solution

cos πx − cos π(2n + 1)x sin πnx = sin πx 2 sin πx

(7.14)

We have Sn =

n X

k=1

e

2πikx

e2πix e2πinx − 1 e2πinx − 1 = = . eπix − 1 1 − e−2πix

We factor out eπinx (resp. e−πix ) from the numerator (resp. denominator) to get Sn = eπi(n+1)x

eπinx −e−πinx 2i eπix −e−πix 2i

,

which is (7.12). The real part of (7.12) is n X k=1

cos 2πkx =

cos(n + 1)πx sin πnx sin π(2n + 1)x − sin πx = , sin πx 2 sin πx

which proves (7.13). The imaginary part of (7.12) is the same as (7.14). Another proof uses the formulae cos α sin β = and sin α sin β = −

1 sin(α + β) − sin(α − β) 2 1 cos(α + β) − cos(α − β) . 2

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

143

The first gives n X

cos 2πkx sin πx

k=1

n

1X (sin(2k + 1)πx − sin(2k − 1)πx) 2

=

k=1

or

1 = sin(2n + 1)πx − sin πx , 2 n X

1 sin(2n + 1)πx 1 − , 2 sin πx 2

cos 2πkx =

k=1

which is (7.13). The second gives n X

sin 2πkx sin πx

k=1

n

1X =− (cos(2k + 1)πx − cos(2k − 1)πx) 2 k=1

which is (7.14). Example 7.2

1 = − cos(2n + 1)πx − cos πx , 2

Let f (x) be defined for −1 ≤ x < 1 as f (x) =

(

0, −1 ≤ x < 0 1, 0 ≤ x < 1,

and then defined periodically with period 2: f (x) = f (x + 2n), n ∈ Z. (cf. Fig. 7.4 for its graph). This function can be represented as

x+1 f(x) = [x + 1] − 2 . 2

(7.15)

March 27, 2007

17:14


144

vista


y 1

-1

0

1

2

3

x

Fig. 7.4

1 1 Recalling B 1 (x) = x − [x] − , we have [x] = x − B 1 (x) − , so that 2 2 x+1 1 1 x+1 − B1 − f (x) = x + 1 − B 1 (x + 1) − − 2 2 2 2 2 1 x+1 = + 2B 1 − B 1 (x + 1). 2 2 Applying the Fourier expansion (7.9) for B 1 (x) below, we see that ∞ ∞ 1 2 X sin 2πn x+1 1 X sin 2πnx 2 f(x) = − + 2 π n=1 n π n=1 n

= =

∞ ∞ 1 1X2 1 X sin 2πnx + (−1)n−1 sin πnx + 2 π n=1 n π n=1 n ∞ 1 2 X 2 + (−1)2m−1 sin 2πmx 2 π m=1 2m

+ =

∞ ∞ 2 1 X 1X1 (−1)2m−2 sin(2m − 1)πx + sin 2πnx π m=1 2m − 1 π n=1 n

∞ 1 1 2 X + sin(2m − 1)πx, x ∈ / Z. 2 π m=1 2m − 1

For x ∈ Z, the Fourier series converges to 0. To deduce (7.15) we argue in the following manner. First y = [x + 1] has the graph (Figure 7.8): this graph by 2n, i.e. by − 1 ≤ x < 2n + 1, we have to pulldown For 2n x+1 x+1 x+1 < n + 1 implies since n ≤ = n. 2 2 2 2 Example 7.3

There is a method much subtler and more ingenious than

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

145

Fig. 7.5

Fig. 7.6

Fig. 7.7

the customary one for deducing (7.9), which appeals to Abel’s continuity theorem. We wish to apply this theorem to the Maclaurin expansion for − log(1 − z). The expansion can most easily be obtained by termwise integration of the absolutely convergent power series ∞ X

n=0

zn =

1 , 1−z

|z| < 1.

(7.16)

March 27, 2007

17:14


146

vista


y 3

2

1

1

0

-1

3

2

x

Fig. 7.8

Indeed, integrating from 0 to z, we obtain

− log(1 − z) =

Z

z 0

∞ Z z ∞ X X 1 1 n dz = z n dz = z , 1−z n n=0 0 n=1

where we have taken the principal branch of the logarithm.

∞ X 1 inθ Now, for z = e , θ ∈ / 2πZ, we contend that the series e is n n=1 convergent, as shown in Example B.2. Hence, Abel’s theorem B.6 allows us to write iθ

∞ X 1 iθ n − log 1 − eiθ = e , n n=1

θ∈ / 2πZ.

By Euler’s identity, the right-hand side is ∞ ∞ X X 1 1 cos nθ + i sin nθ, n n n=1 n=1

(7.17)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

147

while the left-hand side may be transformed into θ

θ

ei 2 − e−i 2 −2i − log 1 − eiθ = − log · θ 2i e−i 2 iθ θ = − log sin − log(−2i) + log e− 2 2 θ i = − log 2 sin − (θ − π), 2 2 π since log(−2i) = log 2 − i. Hence, comparing the real and imaginary 2 parts, we conclude that − log 2 sin

∞ X 1 θ = cos nθ 2 n=1 n

θ − π = −2

∞ X 1 sin nθ. n n=1

(7.18)

(7.19)

Thus we have not only recovered (7.10) again but obtained the Fourier expansion of the log sin function. ( 0, −1 ≤ x < 0 can be expressed Example 7.4 The function f (x) = x, 0 ≤ x < 1 as 12 (x + |x|), the positive part f + (x) of f (x) = x, where the positive part of f (x) is defined to be f + (x) =

f (x) + |f (x)| . 2

The function f (x) (for its graph, see Fig. 7.9) obtained from f (x) by continuing it periodically with period 2 is 1 x+1 x + 1 f (x) = x−2 + x − 2 (7.20) . 2 2 2 x+1 < n + 1, Indeed, for 2n − 1 ≤ x < 2n + 1 (n ∈ Z), we have n ≤ 2 x+1 x+1 = n. Hence for 2n − 1 ≤ x < 2n, we have x − 2 = and so 2 2 x − 2n < 0,so that f (x) = 21 (x − 2n + 2n − x) = 0. For 2n ≤ x < 2n + 1, we x+1 have x − 2 = x − 2n ≥ 0, and therefore f (x) = 2(x − 2n) = x − |x|. 2

March 27, 2007

17:14


148

vista


y 1

0

-1

1

2

3

x

Fig. 7.9

x+1

= x − 2B 1 x+1 , we deduce that 2 x+1 x + 1 1 f (x) = 2B 1 + 2B 1 (7.21) 2 2 2 x+1 x + 1 + B 1 = B1 2 2 x + 1 We remark that the graph of y = B 1 is the directly connected 2 infinite tents (see Fig. 7.10). Noting that 2

2

y 1

-1

0

1

2

3

x

Fig. 7.10

Of course, if we recall this fact first, then the expression (7.21) would follow by inspection. We also note that if we replace the period 2 by 2π, we get 1 x + 21 x + 21 1 1 f 1 (x) = + x−2 x−2 . (7.22) 2 π 2π π 2π Motivated by the above function, we shall digress here into an equivalent

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

149

statement of the celebrated Riemann Hypothesis (abbreviated as RH) to the effect that the Riemann zeta-function does not vanish on the central line σ = 21 . We need some preparations. Let t(x) denote the tent function t(x) =

(

0≤x≤

2x,

1 2

2 − 2x,

1 2

≤ x ≤ 1.

We consider the (k + 1)-th iterate of t divided by 2k+1 : f2k (x) =

1 2k+1

tk+1 (x),

where by an iterate we mean the successive composition of t: tk (x) = t tk−1 (x) ,

t1 (x) = t(x),

t0 (x) = 1.

Denoting the directly connected n tents by fn (x) with length n1 and height 1 k k 2n , we note that f2k (x) = t (x) in the case n = 2 . The Farey sequence Fx of order [x] is defined to be the increasing sequence of irreducible fractions ρν between 0 and 1 (0 exclusive) with denominators ≤ x. This may be constructed from the lower order one by inserting the mediants of adjacent fractions until the denominator reaches P [x]. The total number of elements of Fx is n≤x φ(n) = Φ(x), say, where ϕ(n) indicates the Euler function (cf. (8.27)). For any even integrable core function f on [0, 1] we define the error term Φ(x)

Ef (x) =

X

ν=1

f (ρν ) − Φ(x)

Z

1

f (x) dx, 0

where by an even function we mean that it satisfies f (x) = f (1 − x), which we may assume on symmetry grounds. Ef (x) is defined to be 0 for 0 < x < 1. We consider the Mellin transform (cf. §7.4) of Ef (x): F (s) = s ζ(s) Then we have

Z

∞

Ef (x) x−s

0

dx . x

March 27, 2007

17:14


150


Lemma 7.3 ([BKY, Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2]) (i) For the directly connected n tents fn (x), the associated Mellin transform F (s) is given by F (s) =

1 Fn (s), 12n

Fn (s) =

∞ X cn (m) ms+1 m=1

where

and cn (m) = (m, 2n)2 − (2m, 2n)2 . This Fn (s) can be written down as follows: 1 Fn (s) = −3 1 − s+1 ζ(s + 1) Cn (s), 2 where Cn (s) =

X

d1−s

d|n

X µ(δ) . δ2 δ|d

d:odd

(ii) For n = 2k we have C2k (s) = which does not vanish for

1 2

1 − 2(1−s)(1+k) 1 − 21−s

< δ < 1.

Theorem 7.3 ([BKY, Theorem 2.1 (i)]) Φ(x)

X

ν=1

f2k (ρν ) =

The asymptotic formula

1 1 Φ(x) + O x 2 + , 2k

for every > 0, is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. Example 7.5 The function defined for −π ≤ x < π by f (x) = x and continued to be a periodic function with period 2π is 1 1 f (x) = π B 1 . x+ 2π 2

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



Fig. 7.11

7.2

vista

151

laplace

Integral transforms

Irrespectively of whether it is in pure or applied areas, a great majority of important special functions that appear in applications of analysis are given in the form of an improper integral of a real function Z ∞ (Kf ) (s) = K(x, s) f (x) dx −∞ Z ! Z λ2

t

=

+ lim

lim

λ1 →−∞

λ1

λ2 →∞

K(x, s) f (x) dx,

t

where s = σ + it signifies the complex variable. We call (Kf) (s) an integral transform of f (with respect to the kernel function K) in view of the fact that it is obtained by integrating after multiplying f by the

March 27, 2007

17:14


152


(complex-valued) kernel function K(x, s). In contrast to differential operators D, ∆, ∇ that we have already learned, K, being an operator exerting the integration of f , is called an integral operator. The integral transform of f is denoted by the corresponding capital letter F and is often denoted by FK (s) in order to suggest the (commonly accepted name of ) the kernel: Z ∞ K(x, s) f (x) dx. (Kf) (s) = FK (s) = −∞

We refer to FK (s) as the resulting integral transform of f . When we know which integral transform, we may suppress K and simply write F (s). Integral transforms and operators are useful in solving Boundary Value Problems and Differentiable [integral] Equations. However, we have to impose stringent conditions for the improper integrals to converge. Since the integrals being intrinsically linear, so are the improper ones in the region of their convergence, and a fortiori so are the integral operators. Namely, for c1 , c2 ∈ C, K c1 f1 + c2 f2 = c1 Kf1 + c2 Kf2 . The following integral transforms are most frequently used. Z ∞ (F f) (s) = fˆ(s) = e−ixs f (x) dx (exponential) Fourier transform −∞

(Cf ) (s) = FC (s) =

Z

Z

(LII f ) (s) = FLII (s) =

cos(xs) f (x) dx

Fourier (cosine) transform

−∞

Z

(Sf) (s) = FS (s) =

(LI f ) (s) = FLI (s) =

∞

∞

sin(xs) f (x) dx

Fourier (sine) transform

−∞ ∞

e−xs f (x) dx

(one-sided) Laplace transform

0

Z

∞

e−xs f (x) dx

(two-sided) Laplace transform

−∞

(M f) (s) = FM (s) =

Z

∞

xs−1 f (x) dx

Mellin transform

0

We may express a function that describes the state of a phenomenon at some time interval as a real function f (t) in the time variable t. We call a

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

153

function a causal function if it is not affected by the conditions before the initial time t = 0, i. e. if f (t) = 0, t < 0. It follows from Euler’s identity that (Cf )(s) =

1 1 1 1 (F f )(s) + (F f )(−s), (Sf )(s) = (F f )(s) − (F f )(−s), 2 2 2i 2i

whence we see that both the cosine and sine Fourier transforms are special cases of the exponential Fourier transforms. The region of convergence of the exponential Fourier transform (if it exists) must be a strip γ1 < Im s < γ2 containing the real axis (because t takes values both positive and negative). However, whenever we speak of a Fourier transform, we mean the case s = y being a real variable, we shall refer to this as a Fourier transform Z ∞ (F f )(y) = fˆ(y) = e−ixy f (x) dx, y ∈ R, −∞

and the exponential Fourier transform as the complex Fourier transform. Then the two-sided Laplace transform is no other than the general Fourier transform (LII f )(is) = (F f )(s) in the complex variable s, rotated clockwise by 90◦ , and so their theory is almost parallel and can be translated word-for-word into each other. E. g. the region of convergence (for two-sided Laplace transform) is a strip β1 < Re s < β2 containing the imaginary axis (this is analogous to the fact stated in § A.1 that if f (z) is analytic on the unit circle |z| = 1, then it can be expanded into the Laurent series and g(θ) = f eiθ can be expressed as a Fourier series. If the annulus does not contain the unit circle, then we cannot write g(θ) = f eiθ even if g(θ) can be expanded into Fourier series). There is a theory of operators developed on the basis of two-sided Laplace transforms (cf. [Pa]). It looks as if the Laplace transforms have driven out Fourier transforms in applied analysis (on the ground that the former seem to have a wider applicability than the latter), but they are essentially the same. In comparison with the real Fourier transforms, the condition that the improper integral for (LII f )(s) be convergent in the strip β1 < Re s < β2 restricts the class of functions than the condition that the improper integral for (F f )(y) be convergent for any y ∈ R.

March 27, 2007

154

17:14


vista


Indeed, putting s = σ + i t and ϕσ (x) = e−xσ f (x), then we have Z ∞ (LII f )(s) = (LII f )(σ + i t) = e−ixt ϕσ (tx) dx = (F ϕσ )(t), −∞

σ being regarded as a parameter, so that “the Laplace transform, the range of whose variable is restricted to a vertical line in its region of convergence, is a special case of the Fourier transform and vice versa”. More restrictive it is, the merit of Laplace transforms is that the variable ranging in a strip without restriction, we may employ the powerful theory of analytic functions. For a causal function, its two-sided and one-sided Laplace transforms are the same and the region of convergence (if it exists) is the half-plane Re s = σ > β with a wide range of applications. In what follows, for a causal function f (x) (f (x) = 0, x < 0) , we shall call its one-sided Laplace transform simply the Laplace transform; Z ∞ e−xs f (x) dx, s ∈ C. (Lf )(s) = F (s) = 0

In electrical engineering, with ω being the angular cycle, the variable is often denoted by s = σ + jω (j being the imaginary unit) or p = σ + jω. ˆ Use being made of the Fourier transform f(y), the original function f (x) which behaves differently on different parts of the x-axis may be expressed by a unique formula Z ∞ 1 fˆ(y) eiyx dy. (7.23) f (x) = 2π −∞ This is called the Fourier Integral Theorem. To be more precise, if f, f 0 are piecewise continuous and Z ∞ |f (x)| dx < ∞, −∞

then the theorem holds in the following form: Z ∞ 1 1 ˆ eiyx dy. {f (x + 0) + f (x − 0)} = f(y) 2 2π −∞ If we define the inverse Fourier transform F −1 f of f by Z ∞ 1 −1 f (x) eixy dx, F f (y) = 2π −∞

(7.24)

(7.25)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

155

then we may express the Fourier Integral Theorem as F −1 F f = f or b fb(−x) = f (x). (7.23) may be deduced formally from Theorem 7.2 as follows. If f is piecewise smooth and continuous on [−T, T ], then it can be expanded into a Fourier series: ∞ X

f (t) =

cn e

iλn t

1 cn = T

,

n=−∞

λn = Letting T → ∞,

2π n, T

Z

T /2

f (x) e−iλn x dx,

−T /2

|t|
0, σ = Re s > 0) (7.26) L[sin(ωt)](s) = 2 s + ω2 and its inverse L

−1

ω (t) = sin(ωt) s2 + ω 2

(7.27)

are very important in the application of the theory of Laplace transforms.

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

157

The customary proof of (7.26) is the following. By integration by parts, we have Z Z ω −st ω2 1 −st −st sin(ωt) − 2 e cos(ωt) − 2 e−st sin(ωt) dt, e sin(ωt) dt = − e s s s whence it follows that Z 1 −st ω −st s2 −st − e sin(ωt) − 2 e cos(ωt) . (7.28) e sin(ωt) dt = 2 s + ω2 s s R∞ Under the condition σ > 0, the infinite integral 0 e−st sin(ωt) dt is absolutely convergent, and by (7.28) is equal to ∞ 1 −st s2 ω −st ω − e sin(ωt) − e cos(ωt) . = 2 2 2 2 s +ω s s s + ω2 0 Similarly we may prove the corresponding formula for cosines: L[cos(ωt)](s) =

L

−1

s2

s (ω > 0, σ > 0) + ω2

s (t) = cos(ωt). s2 + ω 2

(7.29)

(7.30)

The following proof is, however, much more concise and instructive. Suppose first that s = σ > 0 and invoke Euler’s identity to deduce that Z ∞ L[sin(ωt)](s) = Im e−st eiωt dt 0 ∞ 1 −(s−iωt) = Im − e s − iω 0 1 s + iω ω = Im 2 = 2 . = Im s − iωt s + ω2 s + ω2 Now, L[sin(ωt)](s) is an analytic function in s for σ > 0 since the integral ω . Hence, by is absolutely convergent there, and so is the function 2 s + ω2 the principle of analytic continuation (Theorem A.9), they must coincide in the region σ > 0, and this proves Formula (7.26). Note that the above argument also gives a proof of (7.29), since Z ∞ s + iω s L[cos(ωt)](s) = Re e−st eiωt dt = Re 2 = 2 (σ > 0) 2 s +ω s + ω2 0

March 27, 2007

17:14


158

vista


Other examples are

h i √ 1 L erfc at−1/2 (p) = e−2a p p

(7.31)

where the error function is defined by

Γ

1 ,z 2

=

√

π erfc

√ z ,

(7.32)

or more generally,

h a i ν ν √ (p) = 2a 2 p 2 −1 Kν (2 ap) , L Γ ν, t

(7.33)

Kν (z) indicating the modified Bessel function of the second kind defined by (6.10), which for ν = 21 reduces to (7.31) in view of (6.14) and

L[Γ(ν, at)](p) =

7.3

Γ(ν) p

1−

1 (1 + ap )ν

.

(7.34)

Fourier transform

In this section, we shall show that the one-sided (complex) Fourier transform and the Laplace transform have the same function by illustrating Examples 7.6 and 7.7. We use the following data and scheme.

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

159


One-sided Fourier Transform Variable z ∈ C the region of absolute convergence Im z < −α (α ∈ R) if |y(t)| = O(eαt ).

Laplace Transform Variable s = iz ∈ C Region of absolute convergence Re s > α if |y| = O(eαt )

yˆ(z) = F+ [y](z) Z ∞ 1 y(t) e−izt dt. = √ 2π 0

Y (s) = L[y](s) Z ∞ y(t) e−st dt =

When y (t) is continuous for t > 0 and lim y 0 (t) e−izt = 0

When y (t) is continuous for t > 0 and lim y 0 (t) e−st = 0,

y(+0) F+ [y 0 ](z) = izF+ [y](z) − √ . 2π

L[y 0 ](s) = sL[y](s) − sy(+0).

0

t→∞

0

0

t→∞

Under similar conditions

Under similar conditions 00

L[y 00 ](s) = s2 L[y](s)

2

F+ [y ](z) = (iz) F+ [y](z) 1 − √ (izy(+0) + y 0 (+0)). 2π F+−1

√ 1 (t) = 2π i eiαt z−α

− sy(+0) − y 0 (+0). L−1

1 (t) = eαt s−α

L[eαt ](s) =

1 1 F+ eiαt (t) = √ 2π i z − α Example 7.6

1 s−α

We solve the differential equation y 00 + ω 2 y = a,

in y = y(t) with initial conditions y(0) = b, y 0 (0) = c, by the Fourier transform method. The above scheme reads: F+ [y 00 ] + ω 2 F+ [y] = aF+ [1] 1 1 1 (iz)2 yˆ(z) − √ izy(+0) + y 0 (+0) + ω 2 yˆ(z) = a √ 2π 2πi z

(7.35)

March 27, 2007

160

17:14


vista


1 (b i z 2 + cz − ia) (iz)2 + ω 2 yˆ(z) = √ 2π z 1 −ibz 2 − cz + ia 1 yˆ(z) = √ =√ 2π z(z − ω)(z + ω) 2π

A B C + + z z−ω z+ω

ia a −ibz 2 − cz + ia = = −i 2 2 z→0 z→0 (z − ω)(z + ω) −ω ω −ibz 2 − cz + ia B = lim (z − ω)ˆ y (z) = lim z→∞ z→∞ z(z + ω) 2 −ibω − cω + ia bω 2 − icω − a = = −i ω · 2ω 2ω 2 −ibz 2 − cz + ia C = lim (z + ω)ˆ y (z) = lim z→∞ z→∞ z(z − ω) 2 2 −ibω + cω − a −ibω + cω + ia = = −ω · (−2ω) 2ω 2 A = lim z yˆ(z) = lim

1 1 1 1 + BF+−1 + CF+−1 AF+−1 y=√ z z−ω z+ω 2π √ √ 1 √ =√ A 2π i + B 2π i eiωt + C 2π i e−iωt 2π a b ω 2 − icω − a iωt b ω 2 + icω − a −iωt = i · (−i) + e + e ω2 2ω 2 2ω 2 b ω 2 − a − icω iωt a e = 2 + 2 Re ω 2ω 2 a 1 = 2 + 2 (b ω 2 − a) cos(ωt) + cω sin(ωt) , ω ω which is the solution. Example 7.7 We solve the same differential equation (7.35) under the same initial conditions as in Example 7.6 by the Laplace transform method. The above scheme reads. L[y 00 ] + ω 2 L[y] = aL[1] s2 Y (s) − s y(0) − y 0 (0) + ω 2 Y (s) = a a s2 + ω 2 Y (s) = b s + c + s

1 s

March 27, 2007

17:14



Y (s) =

vista

161

bs2 + cs + a A B C = + + s(s2 + ω 2 ) s s − iω s + iω

a bs2 + cs + a = 2 s→0 s→0 s2 + ω 2 ω bs2 + cs + a B = lim (s − iω) Y (s) = lim s→iω s→iω s(s + iω) b(iω)2 + c(iω) + a b ω 2 − icω − a = = iω · 2iω 2ω 2 bs2 + cs + a C = lim (s + iω) Y (s) = lim s→−iω s→−iω s(s − iω) 2 −b ω − icω + a = −iω · (−2iω) A = lim s Y (s) = lim

y = AL−1

1 1 1 + BL−1 + CL−1 s s − iω s + iω

= A + B eiωt + C e−iωt

b ω 2 − a − icω iωt b ω 2 − a + icω −iωt a + e + e 2 ω 2ω 2 2ω 2 a 1 = 2 + 2 (b ω 2 − a) cos(ωt) + cω sin(ωt) , ω ω

=

which is the solution. 7.4

Mellin transform

In connection with the theory of Fourier and Laplace transforms, we shall state basics of the theory of Mellin transforms. If we put e−t = x, f (t) = g(x), FII (s) = GM (s), in the two-sided Laplace transform (LII f ) (s) =

Z

then we get the Mellin transform Z M (f )(s) =

∞

e−ts f (t) dt,

−∞

∞

xs−1 f (x) dx

0

March 27, 2007

17:14


162


and the inverse Mellin transform Z 1 f (s) x−s ds M −1 (f ) (x) = 2πi (c)

(where the integral is taken along the vertical Bromwich path Re s = c) are called the pair of its Mellin transforms. We shall give some typical examples. First, the Mellin transform of cos x is cos π2 s Γ(s), i.e. Z ∞ π s Γ(s). M (cos)(s) = xs−1 cos x dx = cos 2 0 To see this it is sufficient to compute M −1 cos π2 s Γ(s) (x) and we are to show that Z π 1 cos(x) = x−s cos s Γ(s) ds 2πi (c) 2 and this can be easily proved by the Residue Theorem (Theorem A.11), the convergence of the integral taken for granted (which can be checked by the Stirling formula (Corollary 5.1)) RHS = =

∞ X

m=0 ∞ X

Res x−s cos

s=−2m

∞ π X (−1)2m 2m s Γ(s) = cos mπ x 2 (2m)! m=0

(−1)m 2m x = cos x, (2m)! m=0

where we used (2.4). Exercise 7.9 forms.

Similarly as above prove the following pair of Mellin trans-

M (sin)(s) =

Z

∞

xs−1 sin x dx = sin

0

1 sin(x) = 2πi

M

1 1+•

Z

(s) =

x−s sin (c)

Z

∞

xs−1

0

1 1 = 1+x 2πi

Z

π s Γ(s) ds. 2

π 1 dx = , 1+x sin πs

x−s (c)

π s Γ(s), 2

π ds sin πs

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



M e

−•

(s) =

e−x =

Z

1 2πi

vista

163

∞

xs−1 e−x dx =Γ(s),

0

Z

x−s Γ(s) ds. (c)

The second pair appears in Corollary A.4, while the last pair is the most well-known one appearing as (2.1) above. The improper integrals being all absolutely convergent for large values of Re s for which the above formulas hold. Other examples include (7.23) and (B.5).

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Chapter 8

Around Dirichlet’s L-functions

Abstract In this chapter we shall state rudiments of harmonic analysis on Z/q Z and its applications to number-theoretic problems, i.e. to the problems in relation to associated Dirichlet series with periodic coefficients. In §8.1 we shall develop the theory of finite Fourier series (or what amounts to the same, finite Fourier transforms) to such an extent that is sufficient for our intended number-theoretic applications (based on [IK], [Ka], [Ya]). It is instructive to state the results in parallel to those in the general theory of Fourier series (transforms) expounded in Chapter 7. In §8.2, we shall establish a remarkable equivalence between Gauss’ formula and a finite expression for the value of the Dirichlet L-function at 1 as expounded in [HKT].

8.1

The theory of periodic Dirichlet series

In what follows q > 1 always indicates the fixed modulus. Definition 8.1 riod q,

The space C(q) of all arithmetic functions f (n) of pe-

f : Z → C; f (n + q) = f (n), n ∈ Z, 165

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14

166



Fig. 8.1

Gauss

forms a vector space over C. For f , g ∈ C(q), we define their inner product X (f, g) = f (a) g(a). a mod q

Then C(q) becomes a metric vector space with respect to the norm 1 kf k = (f, f ) 2 . The notions of orthogonality, ONS (orthonormal system), ONB (orthonormal basis) remain the same except that we now speak of the inner product. Exercise 8.1 Prove that (1) satisfies the defining properties of a scalar product (cf. Problem 4.4). Example 8.1

For each residue class j mod q let εj be defined by j

εj (n) = e2πi q n .

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14



Fig. 8.2

Then

Proof.

1 1 1 ε0 , ε1 , · · · , εq−1 q q q

167

Dirichlet

is an ONB of C(q).

This follows from the relation (cf. (8.5)) ( X 2πi j−k q, j = k q e (εj , εk ) = = 0, j = 6 k. a mod q

Example 8.2 class j mod q:

vista

Let χj denote the characteristic function of the residue

χj (n) =

(

1, n ≡ j (modq)

0, n 6≡ j (modq).

Then {χ0 , χ1 , · · · , χq−1 } is an ONB of C(q). Definition 8.2

Let (Z/qZ)

×

denote the multiplicative group of reduced × [ be an Abelian character, i.e. a residue classes mod q. Let χ ∈ Z/qZ

March 27, 2007

17:14


168

vista


homomorphism into C× : χ(¯ a¯b) = χ(¯ a) χ(¯b) and a ¯ = a mod q. We extend the domain of definition of χ by 0-extension, i.e. we define χ(a) = χ(¯ a) for (a, q) = 1, and χ(a) = 0 for (a, q) > 1. Then this χ is a completely multiplicative periodic function called a Dirichlet character mod q: χ : Z → C, χ(ab) = χ(a) χ(b), χ(a + q) = χ(a).

× [ is called The particular character induced by the identity χ0 of Z/qZ the principal character mod q and is denoted by χ0 . ˆ of f with respect to the ONB {εj }: Define the Fourier transform f(j) X ˆ = 1 (f, εj ) = 1 f (a) εj (a). f(j) q q

(8.1)

a mod q

Since C(q) =

q−1 M

Cεj , we automatically have the Fourier expansion of f :

i=0

f (n) =

q−1 X

ˆ εj (n) f(j)

(8.2)

j=0

(cf. Theorem 7.1) for which (8.1) gives, in particular, χˆj (a) =

a 1 1 εa (j) = e−2πi q j q q

and the Fourier expansion of χa is X χa = χˆj (a) εj ,

(8.3)

(8.4)

j mod q

which is nothing other than the orthogonality of the additive characters εj ’s: q−1 X a=0

εj (a) =

q−1 X a=0

e

2πi qj a

=

(

q,

j ≡ 0 (mod q)

0, j 6≡ 0 (mod q).

(8.5)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

169

For a Dirichlet character χ, we have (8.32) below. Similarly, the Fourier transform f˜ of f with respect to {χj } is X ˜ = (f, χj ) = f(j) f (a) χj (a) = f (j). (8.6) a mod q

E.g. ε˜j (n) = εj (n).

(8.7)

Hence the Fourier expansion of f is f (n) =

q−1 X

f˜(j) χj (n) =

q−1 X

f (j) χj (n),

(8.8)

j=0

j=0

which is the same as the decomposition of (positive) integers into residue classes mod q and holds true for any arithmetic function f : Z → C, not necessarily periodic. Especially, in the following form of a series, it is of great importance: ∞ X

n=0

f (n) =

q−1 X ∞ X

f (m) χj (m).

(8.9)

j=0 m=0

The function L(s, χ) defined for a Dirichlet character χ mod q by the Dirichlet series ∞ X χ(n) , L(s, χ) = ns n=1

σ>1

(8.10)

absolutely convergent, is called Dirichlet’s L-function. For χ 6= χ0 , (8.10) is (conditionally and uniformly) convergent for σ > 1 by Corollary B.1, and we may speak of the value L(1, χ). Formula (8.32) gives for χ primitive (by (8.40)) q−1 1 X k L(s, χ) = χ(k) ls . G(χ) q

(8.11)

k=1

Example 8.3

Consider the general Hurwitz-Lerch zeta-function Φ(s, a, z) =

∞ X

zn , (n + a)s n=0

(8.12)

March 27, 2007

17:14

170


vista


a > 0, σ > 1. Then, by (8.9), Φ(s, a, z) =

q−1 X j=0

=

∞ X

m=0 m≡j ( mod q)

q−1 X ∞ X j6=0

= q −s

z j+mq (j + mq + a)s m=0 q−1 X j=0

whence Φ(s, a, z) = q −s

zm (n + a)s

zj

∞ X

m=0

(z q )m m+

j+a q

s ,

j +a q z j Φ s, ,z , q j=0

q−1 X

(8.13)

which is the most general Kubert identity (or distribution property). We introduce the vector space of Dirichlet series isomorphic to C(q): Definition 8.3 Let D(q) denote the space of (formal) Dirichlet series ∞ X f (n) , with f (n) ∈ C(q): ns a=1 ) (∞ X f (n) f ∈ C(q), σ 1 . D(q) = ns n=1

If we impose some growth condition on f , the Dirichlet series is convergent in some half-plane, σ 1. The spaces C(q) and D(q) are isomorphic (cf. Yamamoto [Ya]). We may express (8.8) in terms of the Dirichlet series ∞ ∞ X X X f (n) χa (n) f (a) = s n ns n=1 n=1 a mod q X = f (a) ζ(s, a mod q),

(8.14)

a mod q

where ζ(s, a mod q) signifies the partial zeta-function X 1 , ζ(s, a mod q) = ns n≡a mod q

(8.15)

March 27, 2007

17:14



which can be expressed by the Hurwitz zeta-function a −s ζ(s, a mod q) = q ζ s, , q

vista

171

(8.16)

so that it is meromorphic over the whole plane. Hence (8.12) is stated as ∞ X X f (n) a −s , (8.17) =q f (a) ζ s, ns q n=1 a mod q

which continues the left-hand side meromorphically over the whole plane. Example 8.4 we get

If we trace the above argument in the reverse direction, X ∞ a χa (n) = q −s ζ s, . q ns n=1

Substituting (8.4) and (8.3) for χa , we obtain X ∞ X 1 a = χˆj (a) εj (n) s q −s ζ s, q n n=1 j mod q

∞ X 1 X j (n) = , εa (j) q ns n=1 j mod q

whence we have q

−s

a ζ s, q

j 1 X εa (j) ls = , q q

(8.18)

j mod q

being valid for all s 6= 1, whose ls (x) indicates the polylogarithm function defined by (3.3) (cf. Ishibashi [Is, p.447]). But, if we state (8.18) in the form (the genuine generalization of the Eisenstein formula) q−1 X a k a e−2πi q k ls = q 1−s ζ s, − ζ(s), (8.19) q q k=1

and interpret the case s = 1 as the limit as s → 1, then (8.19) is valid for all s ∈ C. The limit interpretation of the right-hand side of (8.19) corresponds to the normalization ls (0) = ζ(s) in Milnor [Mi], but even under this, (8.16) is not valid and only (8.19) stands. We state the limiting case of (8.19) as Theorem 8.1

The limiting case of (8.19) implies Gauss’ formula (8.29).

March 27, 2007

17:14


172

vista


For details, cf. [LDH]. Exercise 8.2

Prove that the formula q−1 r 1 X −2πi qj r a+j φ s, a, ξ + , qξ = e e2πijξ q −s φ s, q q r=0 q

(8.20)

is the two different expressions for the j-component ∞ X e2πimξ φj (s, a, ξ) = χj (m) (m + a)s m=0

of φ(s, a, ξ) =

q−1 X

φj (s, a, ξ),

(8.21)

j=0

where φ(s, a, ξ) = Φ(s, a, e2πiξ ) (cf. (8.12)). Note that one expression is a consequence of (8.4), χa (m) =

1 X 1 X 2πi m−a q j. a (j) j (m) = e q q j mod q

Solution

Since φj (s, a, ξ) =

∞ X

m=0 m≡j ( mod q)

e2πimξ , we may express it, on (m + a)s

writing m = j + lq, l = 0, 1, · · · , as ∞ X e2πi(lqξ+jξ) s a+j l=0 l + q a+j 2πijξ −s =e q φ s, , qξ . q

φj (s, a, ξ) = q −s

On the other hand, substituting (8.3), we derive that φj (s, a, ξ) = =

(8.22)

j mod q

q−1 ∞ X e2πimξ 1 X 2πi m−j q r e s q (m + a) m=0 r=0

r q−1 ∞ 1 X −2πi qj r X e2πi(ξ+ q )m e , q r=0 (m + a)s m=0

which is the right-hand side of (8.21).

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

173


We confirm that adding the right-hand side of (8.21) over j mod q, we obtain φ(s, a, ξ), i.e. (8.22) in terms of the right-hand side of (8.21). As suggested by (5.56)0 , there is a counterpart of (8.11), which is a decomposition into residue classes mod q: q−1 1 X a L(s, χ) = s χ(a) ζ s, q a=1 q

(8.23)

being valid for any Dirichlet character mod q, not necessarily primitive. Recall the Laurent expansion for ζ(s, x), ζ(s, x) =

1 − ψ(x) + O(s − 1), s−1

s → 1,

(8.24)

where ψ(x) signifies the Euler digamma function (cf. §5.1) ψ(x) =

Γ0 0 (x) = (log Γ(x)) . Γ

(8.25)

Also recall the orthogonality of characters q−1 X a=1

χ(a) =

(

0, ϕ(q),

if χ 6= χ0 ,

(8.26)

if χ = χ0 ,

where χ0 and ϕ(q) stand for the principal character mod q and the Euler function defined by ϕ(q) =

X

1,

(8.27)

1≤a≤q (a,q)=1

respectively. From (8.23), (8.24) and (8.26) we obtain q−1 1X a L(s, χ) = − χ(a) ψ + O(s − 1), q a=1 q

s→1

and a fortiori q−1 a 1X χ(a) ψ L(1, χ) = − . q a=1 q

(8.28)

March 27, 2007

17:14

174


vista


For the values of ψ pq , we have a formula of Gauss (2.58) which may be stated by Lemma 8.1 below as X p π 2pk p k = −γ − log q − cot π + 2 cos ψ π log 2 sin π , (8.29) q 2 q q q q k≤ 2

where γ is the Euler constant (ψ(1) = −γ) ([B¨ oh], [Ca], [GR]). It was D. H. Lehmer [Leh] who first used (8.29) in his study of generalized Euler constants γ(p, q) for an arithmetic progression p mod q. He deduced (8.29) [Leh, (11)], and the relation [Leh, Theorem 7], between from p γ(p, q) and ψ q , and stated ([Leh, p.135]) “Our proof via finite Fourier series indicates that Gauss’ remarkable result has a completely elementary basis.” Our main purpose is to elaborate on this statement of Lehmer and, on streamlining the argument, to show that (8.29) has a purely numbertheoretic basis and ψ is a number-theoretic function. As a converse to this, we shall also put into practice the statement of Deninger [D, p.180], to the effect that (8.29) can be used to evaluate L(1, χ). Indeed, Funakura was on these lines (cf. [Fu, (1)]) but he appealed to the integral representation of Legendre and applied Lehmer’s argument of using − log(1 − e2πix ), 0 < x < 1.

8.2

The Dirichlet class number formula

We may now state our main theorem in this chapter. Theorem 8.2 for L(1, χ).

Gauss’ formula (8.29) is equivalent to finite expressions

L(1, χ) =

q−1 a π X χ(a) cot π 2q a=1 q

(8.30)

for χ odd and q−1 a 1 X χ b(a) log 2 sin π L(1, χ) = − √ q a=1 q

(8.31)

March 27, 2007

17:14



vista

175

for χ even, where χ b(a) =

k 1 X χ(k) e−2πi q a q

(8.32)

k mod q

is the finite Fourier transform of χ (intimately related to the generalized Gauss sum G(a, χ), see (8.39) below). Corollary 8.1

For primitive χ, (8.30) and (8.31) reduce, respectively, to q−1 πi X a L(1, χodd ) = − χ(a) B1 G(χ) a=1 q

(8.30)0

q−1 1 X a L(1, χeven) = − χ(a) log 2 sin π , G(χ) a=1 q

(8.31)0

and

where G(χ) = G(1, χ) is the normalized Gauss sum. Remark 8.1

(i) On symmetry grounds, (8.30) may be stated as q−1 πi X a χ b(a) B1 , L(1, χodd ) = − √ q a=1 q

(8.30)00

which can be explicitly computed to be (8.30) (cf, e.g. [Fu]). Although both Funakura [Fu] and Ishibashi-Kanemitsu [IK] treated the case of periodic functions f (n) of period q, the formulas (8.30)00 and (8.31) are implicit in Yamamoto’s work [Ya], depending on (8.11) and (7.18) & (7.19). (ii) The last statement of Corollary 8.1 follows, on recalling that the Kronecker characters |d| (d < 0) and d· (d > 0) are primitive odd and · even characters mod |d|, respectively. In the course of proof of Theorem 8.2, we shall encounter an interesting P number-theoretic function log Nq = − d|q (µ(d) log d) dq which eventually cancels out in view of the following Theorem 8.3. We believe this function deserves wider attention and we state

March 27, 2007

17:14


176

vista


Theorem 8.3 For q > 1, the number-theoretic function log N (q) = log Nq admits the following expressions. log Nq = −q

X µ(d) d

d|q

log d 

q−1 X

(8.33) 

µ

q (a,q)



a  log2 sin π q q ϕ a=1 (a,q) q X Λ(d) ϕ = d

= −ϕ(q)

(8.34) (8.35)

d|q

= ϕ(q)

X log p , p−1

(8.36)

p|q

the product extending over all prime divisors of q, where µ and Λ signify the M¨ obius function and the von Mangoldt function, respectively. For a proof cf. [HKT].

8.3

Proof of the theorems

Let f (n) be an arithmetic periodic function of period q: f : Z → C;

f (n + q) = f (n),

n ∈ Z.

We define the parity of f as follows: f is called even if f (−n) = f (n) and odd if f (−n) = −f (n). We prepare some lemmas, of which Lemma 8.1 is repeatedly used in what follows, without notice. Lemma 8.1

If f is odd, then q−1 X

f (a) = 0

a=1

and if f is even, then q−1 X a=1

f (a) = 2

X

a≤ 2q

f (a) = 2

X

a< 2q

f (a) +

1 + (−1)q q . f 2 2

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

177


In particular, if f and χ mod q are of opposite parity, then q−1 X

χ(a) f (a) = 0

a=1

while if f and χ are of the same parity and q > 2, then q−1 X

χ(a) f (a) = 2

a=1

X

χ(a) f (a) = 2

X

χ(a) f (a).

a< 2q

a≤ q2

Lemma 8.2 The ψ function satisfies Gauss’ multiplicative formula or the modified Kubert identity ψ(x) = log q + Lemma 8.3

and

q−1 x+a 1 X ψ . q a=0 q

(8.37)

Let χ denote a Dirichlet character mod q, q ≥ 3. Then  0 if n 6≡ ±1 (mod q), X χ(n) = ϕ(q)  if n ≡ ±1 (mod q). χ even 2   0    ϕ(q) X χ(n) = 2   χ odd  − ϕ(q) 2

if

n 6≡ ±1

if

n≡1

if

n ≡ −1

(mod q), (mod q), (mod q),

where the sum is extended over all even and odd characters, respectively. Proof. For q ≥ 3, the set {±1} forms a subgroup of the reduced residue × class group G = (Z/qZ) of index 2. Hence the factor group G/{±1} has ϕ(q) order . Since the set of all even characters coincides with the character 2 group of G/{±1}, it follows, from the orthogonality of characters, that X X χ(a) = χ(n) χ even

\ χ∈G/{±1}

 0 = ϕ(q)  2

if n 6= 1 in G/{±1}, if n = 1 in G/{±1},

March 27, 2007

17:14


178

vista


which proves the first assertion. The second assertion follows from the first and the orthogonality relation ( X 0 if n 6≡ 1 (mod q) χ(n) = (8.38) ϕ(q) if n ≡ 1 (mod q). b χ ∈G

This completes the proof. It is instructive to give a proof of Corollary 8.1 first. We introduce the generalized Gauss sum G(k, χ) =

q−1 X

a

χ(a) e2πi q k

(8.39)

a=1

= q χ(−1) χ b(k)

(cf. (8.32)) and note that it decomposes into

G(k, χ) = χ(k) G(χ)

(8.40)

if and only if χ is primitive ([Ap4], [Da]). We derive (8.30)0 by appealing to Eisenstein’s formula q−1 X p k k −2πi p q = B1 − q B 1 l0 e q q k=1

or rather its converse (cf. [LDH], [Is], [Wa]) q−1 X k=1

B1

p p k e2πi q k = −l0 − 1 − B1 q q p i = − cot π. 2 q

Substituting (8.41) into (8.30), we find that L(1, χ) =

q−1 πi X k B1 G(k, χ). q q k=1

Using (8.38) and other known facts G(χ) = χ(−1) G(χ), we conclude (8.30)0 .

|G(χ)|2 = q,

(8.41)

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

179


We may deduce (8.31)0 from (8.31) in a similar way. Substituting (8.32) into (8.31), we obtain L(1, χ) = −

X q−1 q−1 1X 2πk k a χ(a) cos log 2 sin π q q q a=1

(8.42)

k=1

whose inner sum is again G(k, χ). Therefore for χ primitive, we have q−1 k G(χ) X χ(k) log 2 sin π , L(1, χ) = − q q k=1

whence (8.31)0 follows in the same way.

We now turn to the proof of Theorem 8.2. Proof. That (8.29) implies (8.30) and (8.31) is immediate. Indeed, substituting (8.29) in (8.28) and using Lemma 8.1, we obtain (8.30) for χ odd and (8.42) for χ even, which is the same as (8.31). Now we are to prove the converse, i.e. we are to deduce (8.29) from (8.30) and (8.31). With p, (p, q) = 1, we multiply (8.28) by χ(p−1 ) and sum over χ mod q, χ 6= χ0 to obtain X

χ0 6=χ mod q

χ(p−1 ) L(1, χ) = −

q a 1X ψ q a=1 q

X

χ(ap−1 )

(8.43)

χ0 6=χ mod q

= S1 + S2 ,

say, where S1 = −

X q 1 X a ψ χ(ap−1 ) q a=1 q χ mod q

and S2 =

q 1 X a ψ χ0 (ap−1 ). q a=1 q

By the orthogonality (8.38) of characters, p ϕ(q) ψ S1 = − . q q

(8.44)

March 27, 2007

17:14


180

vista


The sum S2 is q−1 1 X∗ a S2 = , ψ q a=1 q the star on the summation sign indicating the sum over all a’s, relatively prime X to q, (a, q) = 1, which condition may be replaced by introducing the µ(d). Writing the condition d|(a, q) as d|q, a = a0 d ≤ q − 1, we sum d|(a,q)

have

0 d −1 X 1 X a S2 = µ(d) ψ q q 0 d q

a =1

d|q

q d X a+1 q q q ψ whose inner sum is = − log − γ + γ by Lemma 8.2. q d d d d a=0 Hence

S2 = −

1 ϕ(q) log q ϕ(q) − log Nq − γ, q q q

(8.45)

where log Nq is defined by (8.33). Substituting (8.44) and (8.45) in (8.43), we conclude that X

χ0 6=χ mod q

χ(p−1 ) L(1, χ) =

ϕ(q) q

−ψ

p 1 − log q − log Nq − γ . q ϕ(q)

(8.46) It remains to calculate the left-hand side of (8.46) by dividing the sum into two parts: X

χ0 6=χ even

and

X

χ odd

substituting therewith (8.31) and (8.30), respectively.

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

181


First, by (8.31), X

χ(p−1 ) L(1, χ)

(8.47)

χ0 6=χ mod q

q−1 a 1 X log 2 sin π = −√ q a=1 q

X

χ0 6=χ even

χ(p) χ b(a)

X q−1 a 1 X −χ0 (p) χ log 2 sin π = −√ c0 (a) q a=1 q χ even = T1 + T2 ,

say, where X q−1 1 X 1 a χ(p) √ T1 = − √ log 2 sin π q a=1 q q χ even

X

k

χ(k) e−2πi q a

(8.48)

k mod q

and q−1 a 1 X 1 log 2 sin π √ T2 = √ q a=1 q q

X

k

χ0 (k) e−2πi q a .

(8.49)

k mod q

The inner double sum of T1 is 1 X −2πi kq a X e χ(kp−1 ) √ q χ even k mod q ϕ(q) p 1 ϕ(q) −2πi pq a p + e2πi q a = √ cos 2π a e =√ q 2 q q

by Lemma 8.3, and so

T1 = −

q−1 ϕ(q) X a p cos 2 aπ log 2 sin π , q a=1 q q

while the inner sum for T2 is X

∗ −2πi kq a

e

k mod q

which is equal to µ ϕ(q) ϕ

q (a,q) q (a,q)

,

(8.50)

March 27, 2007

17:14


182

vista


by H¨ older’s result (cf. [Leh, p.133]). Hence

q µ q−1 X (a,q) ϕ(q) a T2 = log 2 sin π q q a=1 q ϕ (a,q)

but this is − q1 log Nq by (8.34), i.e.

T2 = −

1 log Nq . q

(8.51)

Substituting (8.50) and (8.51) in (8.47), we obtain q−1 X ϕ(q) X a 1 p −1 χ(p ) L(1, χ) = − cos 2π aπ log 2 sin π − log Nq . q a=1 q q q

χ0 6=χ even

(8.52)

On the other hand, by (8.30) and Lemma 8.3, X

q−1 a X π X cot π χ(ap−1 ) 2q a=1 q χ odd π ϕ(q) p ϕ(q) −p = cot π − cot π 2q 2 q 2 q πϕ(q) p = cot π. 2q q

χ(p−1 ) L(1, χ) =

(8.53)

Combining (8.52) and (8.53) implies X χ(p−1 ) L(1, χ)

(8.54)

χ odd

χ0 6=χ mod q

q−1 p ϕ(q) X a 1 ϕ(q) p cos 2 aπ log 2 sin π − log Nq + =− π cot π. q a=1 q q q 2q q

Comparing (8.46) and (8.54), we see that the terms involving log Nq cancel each other and (8.29) follows. This completes the proof.

March 27, 2007

17:14


Appendix A

Complex functions

A.1

Function series

Fig. A.1

D’alembert

Theorem A.1 A uniformly convergent series of analytic functions may be integrated term by term along any curve inside the region of uniform convergence. Namely, if the functions f1 (z), f2 (z), ... 183

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


184

vista


are analytic in D and the series ∞ X

fn (z) = f (z)

n=1

is uniformly convergent in D, then for any curve C ⊂ D, we have Z

f (z) dz =

Z X ∞

fn (z) dz =

C n=1

C

∞ Z X

n=1

fn (z) dz. C

Proof. fn (z) need not be analytic but enough to be continuous in D (since analyticity ⇒ continuity, the assumption R is excessive). Since f (z) is continuous in D, it follows that the integral C fn (z) dz, n ∈ N exists. So n R P fi (z). Since sn (z) converges to does the integral C sn (z) dz for sn (z) = i=1

f (z) uniformly on D, we have

∀ε > 0, ∃n0 = n0 (ε) ∈ N s.t. n > n0 ⇒ |sn (z) − f (z)| < ε,

∀z ∈ D.

Hence for n ≥ n0 , we have Z (sn (z) − f (z)) dz < ε Λ(C), C

where Λ(C) is the length of C so that Z Z lim sn (z) dz = f (z) dz n→∞

C

C

whose left-hand side is nothing other than the definition of ∞ Z X

n=1

fn (z) dz. C

Theorem A.2 The limit of the uniformly convergent series of analytic functions is interchangeable with integration along any curve lying in the region of its uniform convergence. Namely, if f1 (z), f2 (z), ... are analytic in D and lim fn (z) = f (z),

n→∞

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

185

Complex functions

uniformly in D, then for any Jordan curve C ⊂ D, we have Z Z Z f (z) dz = lim fn (z) dz = lim fn (z) dz. C

n→∞

C n→∞

C

Definition A.1 If a sequence (respectively, series) of functions defined on D are uniformly convergent on any bounded closed subset of D (i.e., on any compact subset D 0 such that D0 ⊂ D), we say that the sequence (respectively, series) is uniformly convergent on D in the wide sense. Theorem A.3

If the functions f1 (z), f2 (z), ...

are (i) analytic in D and (ii) the series ∞ X

fn (z)

n=1

is uniformly convergent in D in the wide sense, then its sum ∞ X

f (z) =

fn (z)

n=1

is analytic in D and its derivative may be obtained by termwise differentiation: 0

f (z) =

∞ X

fn0 (z)

n=1

Also, the termwise differentiated series is uniformly convergent in the wide sense in D. Corollary A.1

Any function series ∞ X

fn (z) := f (z)

n=1

that is uniformly convergent in the wide sense in D is termwise differentiable infinitely many times: f (k) (z) =

∞ X

n=1

fn(k) (z),

k ∈ N.

(and the k-times differentiated series is also uniformly convergent in the wide sense in D.)

March 27, 2007

17:14


186


Proof. We shall prove both Theorem A.3 and its Corollary A.1 at the same time. By the Cauchy integral formula in Theorem A.7, we have for any rectifiable simple curve C in D and any point z in C, ∞ ∞ Z X fn (w) 1 X dw. f (z) = fn (z) = 2πi w−z n=1 n=1 C But

∞ P

fn (w) is uniformly convergent on C, and so Theorem A.1 allows

n=1

us to integrate term by term after multiplying (w − z)−1 : f (z) =

1 2πi

Z X Z ∞ 1 fn (w) f (w) dw = dw. 2πi C w − z C n=1 w − z

Hence the Cauchy integral formula holds for f (z) and so it follows that f (z) is analytic in C and that Z f (w) k! dw, k ∈ N ∪ {0}. f (k) (z) = 2πi C (w − z)k+1 Let Sn (z) =

n X

fk (z)

k=1

be the n-th partial sum of ∞ X

fn (z)

n=1

and take any bounded closed subset D 0 in D. Then take any simple closed contour C ⊂ D of finite length containing D 0 and suppose dist (D 0 , C) = δ > 0. The we have Z Sn (w) k! (k) dw, k ∈ N ∪ {0}. Sn (z) = 2πi C (w − z)k+1 Hence, it follows that k! Λ(C) max |f (w) − Sn (w)| , w∈C 2πδ k+1 whence we have ∀ε > 0,

∃n0 = n0 (ε) ∈ N s.t. n > n0 ⇒

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

187

Complex functions

|f (w) − Sn (w)| < ε on C. Hence, lim Sn(k) (z) = f (k) (z).

n→∞

uniformly on D0 .

Corollary A.2 (The Weierstrass double series theorem) Suppose {fn (z)} are analytic in |z − z0 | < r and has the Taylor expansion fn (z) =

∞ X k=0

(n)

ak (z − z0 )k .

Then if ∞ X

fn (z) = f (z)

n=1

uniformly in the wide sense on |z − z0 | < r, then f (z) is analytic on |z − z0 | < r and its Taylor expansion is given by f (z) =

∞ X

k=0

ak (z − z0 )k

(|z − z0 | < r) ,

ak =

∞ X

(n)

ak .

n=1

That is, the iterates of the double series coincide — the order of summation being interchangeable — ! ∞ X ∞ ∞ ∞ X X X (n) k k ak (z − z0 ) = fn (z) = f (z) = ak (z − z0 ) n=1 k=0

n=1

k=0

Proof. This is a special case of Theorem A.2. The relation between coefficients follows from the Theorem A.8: ak = Theorem A.4

∞ ∞ X 1 (k) 1 X (k) (n) f (z0 ) = fn (z0 ) = ak . k! k! n=1 n=1

If {fn (z)} are analytic in D and lim fn (z) = f (z)

n→∞

uniformly in the wide sense on D, then f (z) is again analytic on D and f (k) (z) = lim fn(k) (z) n→∞

uniformly in D in the wide sense.

March 27, 2007

17:14


188

vista


Most of the above results on infinite series apply to infinite integrals in spite of the fact that in the case of partial sums SnR(z), n goes to ∞ b discretely while in the case of partial integral I(b) = 0 f (z) dz, b goes to ∞ continuously. To assure the uniform convergence in case the series (integrals) are absolutely convergent, the main tool is Weierstrass’ M-test (Majorant series test) which in the case of integrals asserts that given a (complex-valued) function f (x, y), x ∈ [a, b] (resp (a, b) as the case may be), y ∈ Y , if there is a positive (-valued) function M (x) such that for any y ∈ Y , |f (x, y)| ≤ M (x) and Z

∞ a

M (x) dx < ∞ (resp.

Z

b a

M (x) dx < ∞),

R∞ Rb then a f (x, y) dx (resp. a M (x) dx < ∞) is absolutely and uniformly convergent on Y . Following Titchmarsh [Tit], we often refer to this as “by absolute convergence.” If the series or integrals are convergent but not absolutely convergent, i.e. conditionally convergent, we need to appeal to more delicate convergence tests such as Dirichlet’s (cf. §B.2). Exercise A.1 Noting that the principal branch of the natural logarithm log z (often denoted by Log z) may be defined by the Condition 1 d log z = , log 1 = 0, dz z prove the integral representation (Re z > 0) Z ∞ −t e − e−zt dt. log z = t 0

(A.1)

(A.2)

e−(z−1)t − 1 Since the integrand f (t) = f (tz) = −e−t → z−1 t Z ∞ as t → 0, the improper integral f (t) dt is absolutely convergent. Hence Solution

0

we may differentiate under the integral sign to get Z ∞ Z ∞ d 1 f (t) dt = e−zt dt = . dz 0 z 0

March 27, 2007

17:14


189

Complex functions

Since f (t, 1) = 0, we have log 1 = satisfied. Example A.1 (Power series) polynomial

R∞ 0

vista

f (t, 1) dt = 0, and Condition (A.1) is

Series in the form of an infinite degree

f (z) =

∞ X

n=0

an (z − z0 )n ,

centered at z0 , is called a power series centered at z0 . By translation it suffices to consider the power series at 0. We speak of absolute convergence of power series, and the region of (absolute) convergence of a power series is a disc with the boundary called the circle of convergence whose radius is called the radius of convergence and is most conveniently given by D’Alembert’s formula an r = lim n→∞ an+1

if the limit exists (including ∞ ).

We consider the case where 0 < r ≤ ∞ and denote the region of convergence by D. By above theorems we have Theorem A.5 Inside D, the region of convergence, (i) a power series may be integrated term by term along any path lying in D, (ii) a power series is analytic in D and the derivatives may be obtained by term by term P P differentiation and (iii) two power series an z n , bn z n (in their common region D of convergence) may be added, subtracted, multiplied and divided; in particular, the multiplication is carried out by the Cauchy product ! ! ∞ ∞ ∞ X X X n m bn z = cl z l , am z n=0

m=0

cl =

X

l=0

a m bn

m+n=l

(cf. Remark 1.1); the division is carried out exactly as we do with ordinary polynomials: e.g. to check the numerical values of Bernoulli numbers in 1 2 1 3 Example 1.1, we may divide z by z + 2! z + 3! z + · · · to obtain 1 1 1 z 6 2 30 4 = 1 − z + z − z +··· ez − 1 2 2! 4!

March 27, 2007

17:14

190



Similarly, we may carry out the division in Exercise 5.4. To sum up, Theorem A.5 says that we may treat power series as ordinary polynomials (, which disposition is due to Euler). Example A.2 (Dirichlet series) For an increasing sequence of positive −s log λn , with logarithm reals λn , the series of functions fn (s) = λ−s n = e indicating the principal branch, ∞ X

λ−s n

n=1

is called the Dirichlet series. Contrary to the case of power series, the region of absolute convergence of Dirichlet series is a right half-plane and we may speak about the abscissa of absolute convergence, often denote by σa . We have a counterpart of Theorem A.5 for Dirichlet series. Theorem A.6

Let σa denote the abscissa of absolute convergence of ∞ P λ−s a Dirichlet series f (s) = n . Then in the region σ > σa , f (s) is n=1

analytic, integrable and differentiable term by term. Two Dirichlet series ∞ ∞ P P f (s) = am m−s and g(s) = bn n−s may be multiplied by the Dirichm=1

n=1

let convolution:

f (s) g(s) =

∞ X

cl l−s ,

cl =

l=1

X

a m bn .

mn=l

The last sum is often expressed as X X cl = ad bl/d = al/d bd , d|l

d|l

with d|l meaning that d runs though all positive divisors of l. Example A.3 (i) The integral in (2.1) defining the gamma function is (absolutely and) uniformly convergent in the wide sense in σ > 0. (ii) The series (3.2) defining the Riemann zeta-function is (absolutely and) uniformly convergent in the wide sense in σ > 1. Proof. (i) The integral is improper at both end points. We apply Weierstrass’ M-test to e−x xσ−1 . Let s lie in the compact region 0 < σ0 ≤ σ ≤ R, |t| ≤ R, R > 0. Then for 0 < x < 1, e−x xσ−1 < e−xRxσ0 −1 = O(xσ0 −1 ) and 1 x > 1, e−x xσ−1 < e−x xR−1 = O(x−2 ). Since 0 tσ0 −1 dt = O(1) and Rfor ∞ −2 dt = O(1), we conclude the assertion. 1 t

vista

March 27, 2007

17:14


Complex functions

vista

191

(ii) Let 2m−1 ≤ N < 2m . Them N X

n=1

n−σ < 1 + 2 · 2−σ + 4 · 4−σ + · · · + 2m−1 (2m−1 )−σ = 1 + 21−σ + (21−σ )2 + · · · + (21−σ )m−1 1 . < 1 − 21−σ

P∞ Hence n=1 n−σ < ∞, and the series is absolutely convergent for σ > 1. We may also apply (B.4) to obtain Z ∞ X 1 x1−σ 1 −σ + + −σ n = B 1 (w)−σ−1 du + O(x−σ ), σ > 0 σ−1 2 1−σ 1 n≤x

= O(1),

σ > 1.

Theorem A.7 (Goursat) If f (z) is analytic in a domain D, them it has all orders of derivatives f (k) (z), which are also analytic in D, given by the Cauchy integral formula Z f (w) 1 f (k) (z) = dw k! 2πi C (w − z)k+1 Z 1 dk f (w) = dw, 2πi C dz k w − z where C is a closed Jordan curve contained in D. This theorem of Goursat draws a clear line between analytic functions and real differentiable functions. The requirement that a function is analytic at a point (in the neighborhood of a point) is such a stringent restriction that it already implies the existence of derivatives of all orders. Theorem A.8 (Cauchy-Taylor) If f (z) is analytic at z0 , then it can be expanded into the Taylor series in the maximal circle contained in the domain D of analyticity: f (z) =

∞ X

n=0

an (z − z0 )n ,

where an is given by (Theorem A.7) 1 f (n) (z0 ) = an = n! 2πi

Z

C

dn f (w) dw, dz0n w − z0

March 27, 2007

17:14


192

vista


C being any closed contour contained in D. Actual determination of Taylor coefficients may be done by the method of undetermined coefficients. Theorem A.9 (Consistency Theorem or the Principle of Analytic Continuation) If two functions f (z) and g(z) are analytic in a domain D and f (z) = g(z) on a subset of D containing an accumulation point, then f (z) = g(z) all over D. This theorem often applies when two functions f (z), g(z) coincide on a segment ⊂ R, in which case we may extend the domain of analytic functions. Corollary A.3 If a function of the real variable x is real analytic at x0 , i.e. it has the power series expansion in the neighborhood |x − x0 | < r, r>0 f (x) =

∞ X

n=0

an (x − x0 )n ,

an =

f (n) (x0 ) , n!

then there is a unique function f (z) analytic on |z − x0 | < r and coinciding with f (x) on |x − x0 | < r, which is given by ∞ X f (n) (x0 ) (z − x0 )n . f (z) = n! n=0

This is called an analytic continuation of f (x). Most of elementary functions have their analytic continuation as examples of Corollary A.3: ez , sin z, cos z. In a word, given a real power series in x, we get its analytic continuation by changing x by z, the complex variable. Theorem A.10 (Laurent expansion) If f (z) is (one-valued and) analytic in the annulus (ring-shaped domain) D : r < |z − z0 | < R (0 < r < R), then we have the Laurent expansion of f (z): f (z) =

∞ X

n=−∞

an (z − z0 )n ,

where the n-th Laurent coefficient an is given by (r < ρ < R) Z 1 f (z) an = dz 2πi |z−z0 |=ρ (z − z0 )n+1 Z dn 1 1 f (z) n (z − z0 )−1 dz, n ∈ Z = 2πi |z−z0 |=ρ n! dz0

(A.3)

March 27, 2007

17:14


Complex functions

vista

193

The Laurent series (A.3) converges uniformly in any annulus contained in D. 1 (n) f (z0 ) are the Taylor coefficients. The negative For n ≥ 0, an = n! P−1 power part n=−∞ an (z −z0 )n is called the principal part of f (z) at z = z0 . P−1 If the principal part is finite, n=−m an (z − z0 )n , a−m 6= 0, say, then f (z) is said to have an m-th pole at z = z0 , and the coefficient a−1 is called the residue of f (z) at z = z0 , denoted by Z 1 f (z) dz. (A.4) a−1 = Resz=z0 f (z) = 2πi |z−z0 |=ρ If z = z0 is a pole of order m of f (z), then the residue may be calculated in a similar way as the Taylor coefficients, by the method of undetermined coefficients: Clearing the denominator, we have (z − z0 )m f (z) = a−m + a−m+1 (z − z0 ) + · · · + a−1 (z − z0 )m−1 + · · · . Hence differentiating m − 1 times, we get dm−1 ((z − z0 )m f (z)) = (m − 1)! a−1 + O(z − z0 ). dz m−1 Hence Resz=z0 f (z) = a−1 =

dm−1 1 lim ((z − z0 )m f (z)) (m − 1)! z→z0 dz m−1

(A.5)

which is applicable to many similar settings. It is advisable to remember the process rather than Formula (A.5). A.2

Residue theorem and its applications

Theorem A.11 (The (Cauchy) Residue Theorem) Let C be a piecewise smooth (Jordan) curve. Suppose f (z) is analytic in a region D containing C except for finitely many singularities (which we may suppose are poles) z1 , z2 , · · · , zn (n = 0 inclusive). Then we have Z n X f (z) dz = 2πi Resz=zi f (z). (A.6) C

i=1

Remark A.1 By Theorem A.11, the value of the integral may be determined by computing the residues, which, as stated above, amounts to

March 27, 2007

17:14


194

vista


clearing the denominator. The vacuous case n = 0 implies the most fundamental Cauchy Integral Theorem which asserts that the integral along a closed curve contained in the region of analyticity is 0, which in turn originates from the fact that in this case the region can be made to shrink into a point, a topological feature of analytic functions in a region. Theorem A.12 Suppose f (z) is a rational function in z satisfying the conditions (i) it has no poles on the positive real axis and (ii) for some a ∈ R, a 6∈ Z, we have lim z a+1 f (z) = 0,

z→0

lim z a+1 f (z) = 0.

z→∞

Then, Z

∞

xa f (x) dx =

0

2πi X Res (z a f (z)) , 1 − e2πia

(A.7)

z6=0

where the power function is defined by z a = exp (a Log z), Log z signifying the principal branch. Proof. First note that the improper integral (A.7) is absolutely convergent both at 0 and ∞ by the Weierstrass M-test. Since f (z) has only finitely many poles, we may choose 0 < r < R such that all the poles of f (z) other than the origin lies in the annulus r < |z| < R. Let D denote this annulus with branch cut along the positive real axis, i.e. its boundary consisting of the curves C1 : starting from r and moving along the upper edge of the positive real axis to R, moving along the bigger circle CR and returning back to the point R, then moving along the lower edge of the positive real axis to r, moving along the smaller circle cr , and returning to the starting point r. C1 : z = x, 0 ≤ x ≤ R; CR : z = Reiθ , 0 < θ < 2π; C2 : z = xe2πi , x : R → r; cr : z = re−iθ , 0 < θ < 2π. Then we apply the residue theorem to this cut region. Since the argument of z increases from 0 to 2π, we have Z r Z a z f (z) dz = xa e2πia f (x) dx, R

C2

whence it follows that 1−e

2πia

Z

∞

xa f (x) dx = 2πi

0

X z6=0

Res (z a f (z)) .

March 27, 2007

17:14


vista

195

Complex functions

We shall assign a precise meaning to this procedure. We integrate the branch g(z) = z a f (z),

0 < arg z < 2π

(with branch cut along the positive real axis as above) along CR and cr : Z Z g(z) dz, g(z) dz. CR

cr

By dividing the annulus by any ray starting from the origin and lying inside the second and the third quadrants, we introduce two regions D1 and D2 with branch cut along the negative and positive imaginary axis, respectively. For concreteness’ sake, we choose the negative real axis (any ray can do if there are no poles of the integrand on it): L : z = xeπi , x : R → r and −L. Now integrate the branch g1 (z) = z a f (z),

3 1 z 6= 0, − π < z < π 2 2

along ∂D1 = C1 + CR,1 + L + cr,1 , to get Z R Z Z Z a(Log x+i0) e f (x) dx + g1 + g1 + r

CR,1

L

g1 cr.1

= 2πi Res ea(log|z|+i arg z) f (z), z∈D1

where CR,1 (resp. cr,1 ) signifies the upper half of CR , (resp. cr ,) . Also integrating the branch g2 (z) = z a f (z),

z 6= 0,

5 1 π

Vistas of Special Functions

Vistas of Special Functions

Vistas of special functions