Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the research-practice gap

TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS Bridging the Research - Practice Gap Edited by MARGO MAINE BETH HARTMAN MCGILLEY DOUGLAS...

Author: Margo Maine | Beth Hartman McGilley | Douglas Bunnell

161 downloads 2162 Views 8MB Size Report

This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form

DOWNLOAD PDF

TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS Bridging the Research - Practice Gap Edited by

MARGO MAINE BETH HARTMAN MCGILLEY DOUGLAS W. BUNNELL

AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier

Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA First edition 2010 Copyright Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (þ44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively, visit the Science and Technology Books website at www.elsevierdirect.com/rights for further information Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN: 978-0-12-375668-8 For information on all Academic Press publications visit our website at www.elsevierdirect.com Typeset by TNQ Books and Journals Printed and bound in United States of America 10 11 12 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Biographies Senior Editor Margo Maine, PhD, FAED, cofounder of the Maine & Weinstein Specialty Group, is a clinical psychologist who has specialized in eating disorders and related issues for 30 years. Author of: Effective Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Eating Disorders: The Heart of the Matter, co-edited with William Davis and Jane Shure (Routledge, 2009); The Body Myth: Adult Women and the Pressure to Be Perfect (with Joe Kelly, John Wiley, 2005); Father Hunger: Fathers, Daughters and the Pursuit of Thinness (Gurze, 2004); and Body Wars: Making Peace With Women’s Bodies (Gurze, 2000), she is a senior editor of Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention and vice president of the Eating Disorders Coalition for Research, Policy, and Action. A Founding Member and Fellow of the Academy for Eating Disorders and a member of the Founder’s Council and past president of the National Eating Disorders Association, she is a member of the psychiatry departments at the Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital’s Mental Health Network and at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, having previously directed their eating disorder programs. Dr Maine is the 2007 recipient of The Lori Irving Award for Excellence in Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention, given by the National Eating Disorders Association. She lectures nationally and internationally on topics related to the treatment and prevention of eating disorders, female development, and women’s health.

Editors Douglas W. Bunnell, PhD, FAED, is a graduate of Yale University and received his doctoral degree from Northwestern University. He is a clinical psychologist and Vice President and Director of Outpatient Clinical Services for The Renfrew Center, overseeing the clinical programming and training for Renfrew’s eight outpatient treatment centers. He is the editor of Renfrew’s professional newsletter, Perspectives, and cochairs their research committee. He serves on the editorial board of Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention. A Fellow of the Academy for Eating Disorders, he is a former board president of the National Eating Disorders Association, a member of National Eating Disorder Association’s Founders Council, and is the clinical advisor for the National Eating Disorder Association’s Navigator program which trains parents and family members as resources for newly diagnosed patients and families. Dr. Bunnell also remains active in eating disorders advocacy and awareness. He has written and lectured, nationally and internationally, on eating disorders treatment, research, professional training, eating disorders in men, and the challenges of integrating science and practice. He is also a member of the Academy for Eating Disorders credentialing committee, working to develop practice standards for residential treatment of patients with eating disorders. In addition to his work with Renfrew, the Academy for Eating Disorders and National

ix

x

BIOGRAPHIES

Eating Disorder Association, Dr. Bunnell maintains a private practice in Wilton, Connecticut specializing in the treatment of eating disorders, chronic illness, and the psychological aspects of Lyme Disease. Beth Hartman McGilley, PhD, FAED, Associate Professor, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, is a psychologist in private practice, specializing in the treatment of eating and related disorders, body image, athletes, trauma, and grief. A Fellow of the Academy for Eating Disorders, she has practiced for 25 years, writing, lecturing, supervising, directing an inpatient eating disorders program, and providing individual, family and group therapy. She has published in academic journals and the popular media, as well as having contributed chapters to several books. She is an editor for Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, and is working on her first book, a tribute to the patients she has served over the course of her career. Dr. McGilley also specializes in applications of sports psychology and performance enhancement techniques with athletes at the high school, collegiate, and professional levels. She was the sports psychology consultant for the Wichita State University Women’s Basketball team from 2005 to 2008, and serves as the co-chair of the Association for Applied Sports Psychology (AASP) Eating Disorders Special Interest Group. Dr. McGilley co-founded and is the current President of the Healing Path Foundation, a non-profit foundation dedicated to the prevention and treatment of eating disorders in Kansas. She is a recent graduate of the Kansas Health Foundation Leadership Fellows Training program. Her hobbies include competitive cycling, hiking, and writing.

Contributors Diann M. Ackard, PhD, LP, FAED, is passionate about helping us be the best that we can be. She is a licensed psychologist in private practice, and is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health at the University of Minnesota, and a Research Scientist at Melrose Institute in St Louis Park, Minnesota. She sits on the Boards for the Academy for Eating Disorders and Break the Cycle, and co-founded the Trauma and Eating Disorders Special Interest Group of the Academy for Eating Disorders. She regularly publishes articles in peer-reviewed journals and frequently contributes at meetings and conferences. Drew Anderson, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University at Albany, State University of New York. His research focuses on assessment and treatment of eating disorders, body image disturbance, and psychological and medical problems associated with obesity. Amy Baker Dennis, PhD, FAED, is a clinical and research psychologist who has maintained a clinical practice over 36 years. She was the founding Board Secretary and served on the Board of the Academy for Eating Disorders (AED) for 11 years. She is also a founding member of the Eating Disorder Research Society (EDRS), founding Board President of the Eating Disorder Awareness and Prevention (EDAP) and a member of the Founders Council, and currently serves on the Board of the National Eating Disorder Association (NEDA). She has published and lectured extensively and received numerous awards for her contributions to the field, including the Lifetime

BIOGRAPHIES

Achievement Award givn by NEDA. She is a certified cognitive therapist and has served on the faculties of University of South Florida, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, the Hamilton Holt graduate school at Rollins College in Orlando, Florida, and Wayne State University Department of Psychiatry in Detroit. Judith Banker, MA, LLP, FAED, is the founder and executive director of the Center for Eating Disorders, a non-profit outpatient treatment center in Ann Arbor, Michigan. She is a Past President of the Academy for Eating Disorders and served as chair of the Academy for Eating Disorders Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Special Interest Group for 10 years. With over 35 years of clinical and training experience, Judith’s teaching and writing focuses on the integrative clinical treatment of eating disorders and on research-practice integration in the eating disorders field. Michael E. Berrett, PhD, received his PhD in Counseling Psychology in 1986 from Brigham Young University. He is CEO, Director, and Co-founder of Center For Change in Orem, Utah. Dr. Berrett has served as Chief of Psychology at Utah Valley Regional Medical Center and as Clinical Director of Aspen Achievement Academy. He has 25 years experience in the treatment of those struggling with eating disorders. He is co-author of the American Psychological Association book Spiritual Approaches in the Treatment of Women With Eating Disorders and multiple articles in professional journals. Timothy D. Brewerton, MD, DFAPA, FAED, is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. He is triple board certified in general psychiatry, child/adolescent psychiatry and

xi

forensic psychiatry, Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and Founding Fellow of the Academy of Eating Disorders. Dr. Brewerton has published over 115 articles and book chapters, is editor of the book, Clinical Handbook of Eating Disorders: An Integrated Approach, and serves on the Editorial Boards of the International Journal of Eating Disorders and Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention. Judith Brisman, PhD, is Director and Co-Founder of the Eating Disorder Resource Center in New York City. She is co-author of Surviving an Eating Disorder: Strategies for Family and Friends (Collins Living, 2009, third edn), is an associate editor of Contemporary Psychoanalysis and is on the editorial board of the journal Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention. Dr. Brisman is a supervisor of psychotherapy and a member of the teaching faculty of the William Alanson White Institute. She has published and lectured extensively regarding the interpersonal treatment of eating disorders and currently maintains a private practice in Manhattan, New York. Deborah Burgard, PhD, specializes in the treatment of eating disorders and body image. She created www.BodyPositive.com and is one of the founding proponents of the Health at Every Size model. She co-wrote Great Shape: The First Fitness Guide for Large Women, and chapters in Effective Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Eating Disorders: The Heart of the Matter, Feminist Perspectives on Eating Disorders, and The Fat Studies Reader. Dr. Burgard is also a co-author of the Academy for Eating Disorder’s “Guidelines for Childhood Obesity Programs” and co-leads the Sustainable Health Practices Registry, research on how people create ongoing practices that support their health.

xii

BIOGRAPHIES

Rachel Calogero, PhD, completed her M.A. at The College of William and Mary, and her doctoral and postdoctoral work in social psychology at the University of Kent in Canterbury, England. Currently, she is Assistant Professor of Psychology at Virginia Wesleyan College. Her primary interests cover a spectrum of socio-cultural factors that affect women’s health and well-being, including the role of exercise in eating disorders treatment and recovery, the impact of sexual and self-objectification in girls’ and women’s daily lives, and the perpetuation of fat prejudice and stigmatization. She has published her research widely in peerreviewed journals and book chapters, and is senior editor of the book, Self-Objectification in Women: Causes, Consequences, and Counteractions (APA, 2010). She presents her research frequently in Europe and North America, and offers workshops on mindful excercise in various clinical and community contexts. Nancy Cloak, MD, attended medical school at the University of South Florida and did her psychiatric residency at the Menninger Clinic, where she was also a candidate in the Topeka Institute for Psychoanalysis. Following residency, she worked with eating disorder patients in a university health center, and then completed a fellowship in eating disorders at Sheppard-Pratt Hospital, after which she returned to Oregon to become the medical director of RainRock Treatment Center. Her professional interests include psychodynamic psychotherapy with eating disorder patients, the neurobiology of weight, appetite, and eating disorders, and medical complications of eating disorders. Jillian Croll, PhD, MPH, RD, LD, is the Director of Communications, Outreach, and Research for the Emily Program. She is an

Adjunct Assistant Professor in Department of Food Science and Nutrition at the University of Minnesota. She completed her MPH and PhD in Public Health Nutrition and Epidemiology at the University of Minnesota, and her MS in Nutritional Science at the University of Vermont. Her work in eating disorders includes program development, community education, teaching, research, clinical work, and advocacy. Kimberly Dennis, MD, is the Medical Director at Timberline Knolls Residential Center for women with eating disorders and co-occurring disorders, and has a private practice with Working Sobriety Chicago. She specializes in group and individual treatment for patients with co-occurring eating and substance use disorders. She maintains a holistic perspective, and brings an awareness of the benefits of storytelling, creativity, and play in the recovery process. Dr. Dennis is a member of IAEDP, Academy for Eating Disorders, and ASAM. She is an editorial board member for Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention. Kyle P. De Young, MA, is currently an advanced graduate student in clinical psychology at the University at Albany, State University of New York. His research interests include the course and outcome of eating disorders, exercise, and assessment of eating and exercise-related constructs. Richard A. Gordon, PhD, is Professor of Psychology at Bard College and a clinical psychologist in independent practice. He has treated patients with eating disorders for over 25 years. He is author of Eating Disorders: Anatomy of a Social Epidemic, Second Edition (Blackwell, 2000), and with Melanie Katzman and Mervat Nasser, Eating Disorders and Cultures in Transition (Brunner Routledge, 2001). He was made Honorary Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association for his

BIOGRAPHIES

contributions to the social understanding of eating disorders. Randy K. Hardman, PhD, worked as a psychologist for 26 years. He was a co-founder and director of Center for Change, where he worked for 11 years. Dr. Hardman is currently working with students in the Counseling Center at Brigham Young University-Idaho in Rexburg, Idaho. He is a co-author of the book, Spiritual Approaches in the Treatment of Women with Eating Disorders (American Psychological Association, 2007). He has written and published articles on spirituality and other related eating disorder topics. Bethany Helfman, PsyD, is a clinical psychologist who has practiced in the field for over 18 years. She is currently at Dennis & Moye & Associates in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan where she specializes in the treatment of adolescents, adults, and families affected by eating disorders and their comorbidities. She is a member of the Academy for Eating Disorders and the National Eating Disorder Association. Dr. Helfman supervises other professionals in the field, writes, lectures, and advocates for change related to the factors that make recovery from mental illness more difficult. Anita Johnston, PhD, is Director of the Anorexia & Bulimia Center of Hawaii, which she co-founded in 1982, Clinical Director and Founder of Ai Pono Eating Disorders Programs in Honolulu, and Senior Advisor and Clinical Consultant for Focus Center for Eating Disorders in Tennessee. In 1986, she developed Hawaii’s first in-patient eating disorders treatment program at Kahi Mohala Hospital. Dr. Johnston is the author of Eating in the Light of the Moon: How Women Can Transform Their Relationships with Food Through Myth, Metaphor, and Storytelling (Gurze, 2000) and an international speaker

xiii

and workshop leader with a private practice in Kailua, Hawaii. Kathy Kater, LICSW, is a St. Paul, Minnesota psychotherapist and an internationally known author, speaker, and consultant with over 30 years of experience specializing in the treatment and prevention of body image and eating-related disorders. Frustrated that progress in understanding these problems has not been matched by effective prevention, she authored Healthy Body Image: Teaching Kids to Eat and Love Their Bodies Too, a primary prevention curriculum for upper elementary school children, and Real Kids Come in All Sizes; Ten Essential Lessons to Build Your Child’s Body Esteem, a companion guide for parents. Susan Kleinman, MA, BC-DMT, NCC, is the dance/movement therapist for The Renfrew Center of Florida. She is a trustee of the Marian Chace Foundation, a past president of the American Dance Therapy Association, and a past Chair of The National Coalition for Creative Arts Therapies. She is a coeditor of The Renfrew Center Foundation’s Healing Through Relationship, serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, and has published extensively on the use of dance/movement therapy in the treatment of eating disorders. She was the American Dance Therapy Association recipient of the 2009 Outstanding Achievement Award. Kelly L. Klump, PhD, FAED, is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Michigan State University. Her research focuses on genetic and biological risk factors for eating disorders. Dr. Klump has published over 90 papers and has received a number of federal grants for her work. She has been honored with several awards including the David Shakow Award for Early Career Contributions to Clinical Psychology from the

xiv

BIOGRAPHIES

American Psychological Association and New Investigator Awards from the World Congress on Psychiatric Genetics and the Eating Disorders Research Society. Dr. Klump is a Past President of the Academy for Eating Disorders. Francine Lapides, MFT, writes and teaches from attachment and psychoneurobiological theories (including the arousal and regulation of affect) and their applications to relational and psychodynamic psychotherapy and adult romantic relationships. She supervised and taught psychotherapy through the 1970s and has been in private practice in Santa Cruz, California since 1980. She has trained with Daniel Siegel, is a member of Allan Schore’s Berkeley study group, and has been strongly influenced by relational principles developed at The Stone Center at Wellesley College. She teaches workshops and conferences across the United States and provides an online seminar at www.PsyBC.com. Jason M. Lavender, MA, is currently an advanced graduate student in clinical psychology at the University at Albany. His research interests include the functions of eating disorder behaviors, the course and outcome of eating disorders, and the assessment of body image and eating disorder behaviors. Martha M. Peaslee Levine, MD, is Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Psychiatry, and Humanities and the Director of the Partial Hospitalization and Intensive Outpatient Programs at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Michael P. Levine, PhD, FAED, is Samuel B. Cummings Jr. Professor of Psychology at Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio. His special interest is body image and eating problems and their links with preventive education, developmental psychology, and

community psychology. His most recent book is Levine and Smolak’s (2006) The Prevention of Eating Problems and Eating Disorders: Theory, Research, and Practice (Lawrence Erlbaum). Dr. Levine is a Fellow of the Academy for Eating Disorders. In June 2006 he received the Meehan-Hartley Award for Leadership in Public Awareness and Advocacy from the Academy for Eating Disorders. Richard L. Levine, MD, is Professor of Pediatrics and Psychiatry and is the Chief of the Division of Adolescent Medicine and Eating Disorders at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Kimberli McCallum, MD, CEDS, is a Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Washington University School of Medicine. She is a psychotherapist with a broad range of therapy skills, including dialectic behavior therapy, cognitive behavior therapy, family-based treatment, Family Systems Therapy, and psychoanalysis. She received her MD from Yale, general psychiatric training at UCLA, and child/ adolescent training at Washington University. Dr. McCallum has co-founded several specialized eating disorders units, including inpatient, partial hospital, residential, and intensive outpatient programs. Her current programs include McCallum Place Treatment Center in St. Louis, MO, and Cedar Springs Treatment Center in Austin, TX. Elisa Mott, MEd/EdS, a certified yoga teacher and graduate of University of Florida’s Counselor Education program, also holds a Spirituality in Health Certificate. She was awarded an International Excellence in Counseling Research Grant from Chi Sigma Iota honor society for her study evaluating the use of yoga to improve wellness among females and presented this

BIOGRAPHIES

research at the 2010 ACA conference. She served as CSI’s Wellness Committee chair and has presented on the use of yoga in the treatment of eating disorders at the International Association for Eating Disorder Professionals Conference and the University of Florida’s Professional Development Day. Robbie Munn, MA, MSW, is a clinical social worker who has spoken and written widely about the chaotic impact of eating disorders upon families and the challenges families face in obtaining appropriate treatment. Many women in her family have been affected by eating disorders, including her mother and daughter, nieces, and cousins. In 2000 she joined the Board of the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) as one of its first family members. In 2003 she helped to create and co-chair the first conference in the field to include families and individuals along with clinicians. This has become the esteemed annual conference hosted by NEDA. Kelly N. Pedrotty-Stump, MS, is a highschool guidance counselor and an Exercise Consultant at the Renfrew Center. She codeveloped the exercise program at Renfrew. Kelly is an experienced speaker on exercise and the treatment of eating disorders and has presented at national conferences including National Eating Disorder Association, Academy for Eating Disorders, and MEDA. She has taught workshops on various topics at West Chester University, Temple University and Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. She has published on the topic of exercise abuse and eating disorders. Kelly is also a certified yoga instructor. Pauline Powers, MD, FAED, graduated from the University of Iowa College of Medicine and completed her residency at the University of California at Davis. She is

xv

Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine in the Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. She was the Founding President of the Academy for Eating Disorders and was President of the National Eating Disorders Association 2005e2006. She has published three books on eating disorders and has reported research in several journals. She is currently Director of the University of South Florida Center for Eating and Weight Disorders and the Director of the USF Hope House for Eating Disorders. Adrienne Ressler, MA, LMSW, CEDS, the National Training Director for The Renfrew Center Foundation, is the 2008e2010 president of the International Association for Eating Disorder Professionals board. She attended the University of Michigan and served as a faculty member in the School of Education. Her nationally renowned seminars reflect her background in gestalt, transactional analysis, psychodrama, bioenergetic analysis, and Alexander technique. She is published in the International Journal of Fertility and Women’s Medicine, Social Work Today and authored the chapter BodyMind Treatment in Effective Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Eating Disorders. She is the featured body-image expert for documentaries on both cosmetic surgery and menopause. P. Scott Richards, PhD, is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at Brigham Young University. He received his PhD in Counseling Psychology in 1988 from the University of Minnesota. He is the co-author of the book, Spiritual Approaches in the Treatment of Woman with Eating Disorders (American Psychological Association, 2007). He is also co-author of the book, A Spiritual Strategy for Counseling and Psychotherapy, which was

xvi

BIOGRAPHIES

published in 1997 and 2005 (2nd ed.) by the American Psychological Association. Dr. Richards has published on the topics of spirituality and eating disorders, religion and mental health, and spiritual issues in psychotherapy. Jennifer Sanftner, PhD, is a Clinical Psychologist and tenured Associate Professor of Psychology at Slippery Rock University. She has been teaching in the areas of abnormal, clinical, health, and gender psychology, and directing the undergraduate practicum program at SRU for the last 8½ years. She has researched eating disorders for 19 years, resulting in publications in peer-reviewed journals and chapters. Her research focuses on the application of Relational Cultural Theory to understanding the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders. She is interested in using RCT to understand women’s relationships with their bodies, with others, and with food, and to applying our understanding of RCT to treatment. Lori A. Sansone, MD, is a civilian family medicine physician and the Medical Director for the Primary Care Clinic at WrightPatterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. She has published over 100 refereed articles and 24 book chapters; co-authored the book, Borderline Personality Disorder in the Medical Setting; co-developed the Self-Harm Inventory; co-authors a professional column, The Interface, for the journal Psychiatry, and co-authors a local monthly newsletter, Mental Health Issues in Primary Care. Randy A. Sansone, MD, is a professor at Wright State University School of Medicine in Dayton, Ohio, and Director of Psychiatry Education at Kettering Medical Center. He has published over 225 refereed articles and 33 book chapters; co-edited the books, Self-Harm Behavior

and Eating Disorders and Personality Disorders and Eating Disorders; co-authored the book, Borderline Personality Disorder in the Medical Setting; co-developed the Self-Harm Inventory; and co-authors a professional column, The Interface, for the journal Psychiatry. Dr. Sansone is also the editor of the borderline personality module for the Physician Information and Education Resource and is on six journal editorial boards, including Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention. Doris and Tom Smeltzer, are career educators with master’s degrees in education and counseling psychology, respectively. Tom is a college professor and Doris has taught throughout the K-12 spectrum. When their 19-year-old daughter Andrea died after 13 months of bulimic behaviors, Doris chose to leave her teaching position and has devoted her life to eating disorder prevention through Andrea’s Voice Foundation, the non-profit organization she and Tom co-founded. Doris is the author of Andrea’s Voice: Silenced by Bulimia and Gurze Books’ “Advice for Parents” blog and is developing an educational curriculum for the ED field based on her Internet radio show. Jacqueline Szablewski, MTS, MAC, LAC, is a psychotherapist and licensed addictions counselor who resides in Boulder, Colorado. Combining study in psychology, counseling, and world religions with a selfdesigned concentration in pastoral counseling, Jackie earned her Masters degree in Theological Studies from Harvard University. She has worked along the continuum of care in agency and hospital settings. Specializing in eating disorders, addiction recovery, and life transitions, particularly with individuals challenged by concomitant mood disorders, trauma, and grief issues,

BIOGRAPHIES

Jackie has worked in the field for nearly two decades. She has maintained a private practice in Boulder, Colorado for the last 14 years. Mary Tantillo, PhD, RN, CS, FAED, is the Director of the Western New York Comprehensive Care Center for Eating Disorders, an Associate Professor of Clinical Nursing at the University of Rochester School of Nursing, a Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, and CEO/Clinical Director of a free-standing Eating Disorders Partial Hospitalization Program, The Healing Connection, LLC. She is a fellow of the Academy for Eating Disorders, as well as a previous board member, present chairperson for the Academy for Eating Disorders Credentialing Task Force, and co-chairperson for the Patient/Carer Task Force. Edward P. Tyson, MD, has been treating eating disorders for more than 20 years and is board certified in both Family Medicine and Adolescent Medicine. After serving as Director of Adolescent Clinics for the Department of Pediatrics at Children’s Hospital of Oklahoma, he opened a private practice in Austin, Texas specializing in eating disorders. Dr. Tyson is an active member and frequent presenter at the professional eating disorder organizations.

xvii

He is an advocate for those with eating disorders and teaches residents and medical students, as well as undergraduate and graduate classes, at the University of Texas about eating disorders. Kitty Westin is the founder and former President of the Anna Westin Foundation, which has now merged with the Emily Program Foundation. The Anna Westin Foundation was started by Anna’s family after Anna died in 2000 as a direct result of anorexia. The Westins also started the first and only residential program to treat people with eating disorders in Minnesota. Kitty is also the past President of the Eating Disorders Coalition for Research, Policy & Action and she serves on the Academy for Eating Disorders Patient/Carer Task Force, and is the Co-chair of the Academy for Eating Disorders Advocacy/Communications Committee. Jancey Wickstrom, AM, LCSW, is the Milieu Manager and DBT Specialist at Timberline Knolls Residential Center for women with eating disorders and cooccurring disorders. While a student at University of Chicago, she received training in DBT at the Emotion Management Program, and maintains a group and individual DBT practice there. Ms. Wickstrom firmly believes in the powerful effects of mindfulness meditation to help every person create a meaningful life.

Abbreviations AA, Alcoholics Anonymous ACC, anterior cingulate cortex ACT, acceptance commitment therapies ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder AN, anorexia nervosa ANBP, anorexia nervosa, binge purge subtype of anorexia nervosa ANS, autonomic nervous system BED, binge eating disorder BMI, body mass index BN, bulimia nervosa BPD, borderline personality disorder CAT, cognitive analytic psychotherapy CBC, complete blood cells CBT, cognitive behavior therapy CPT, cognitive processing therapy CRF, corticotrophin releasing factor DBT, dialectical behavior therapy DE, disordered eating DEX, dysfunctional exercise DEXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry DMT, dance/movement therapy DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual EBP, evidence-based practice EBT, evidence-based treatment ED, eating disorder EDI, Eating Disorder Inventory EDNOS, eating disorder not otherwise specified EST, empirically supported treatments FBT, family-based treatment fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging fNIRS functional near-infrared spectroscopy

FTT, failure to thrive GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease HPA, hypothalamic pituitary axis IFT, internal family therapy IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy LH, left hemisphere MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitors MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy MB-EAT, mindfulness-based eating disorder training MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction MET, motivational enhancement therapy MI, motivational interviewing MPC, medial prefrontal cortex NA, narcotics anonymous NES, night eating syndrome OA, overeaters anonymous OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder OFC, orbital frontal cortex OTC, over the counter PET, positron emission tomography PFC, prefrontal cortex PM, perceived mutuality PPI, proton pump inhibitors PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder RBC, red blood cells R/M, relational/motivational approach RCT, relational-cultural theory RCTs, randomized controlled trials RFS, refeeding syndrome RH, right hemisphere SD, standard deviation SIV, self-inflicted violence SMA, superior mesenteric artery

xix

xx SOC, stage of change SOCT, stages of change theory SNRI, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors SRED, sleep-related eating disorder

ABBREVIATIONS

SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor SUD, subjective units of distress TCA, tricyclic antidepressants WBC, white blood cells

Introduction Eating Disorders as Biopsychosocial Illnesses

The point is that profound but contradictory ideas may exist side by side, if they are constructed from different materials and methods and have different purposes. Each tells us something important about where we stand in the universe and it is foolish to insist that they must despise each other. Postman, 1995, p. 107

The idea for this volume, Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the Research/Practice Gap, emanated from our experiences as clinicians facing the challenge of helping patients and their loved ones back from the precipice of self-destruction brought on by eating disorders (EDs). While we are each very active in our professional development and ongoing education, every day we experience the impact of the significant gap between what the research in journals, books, and conference presentations provides and how our patients present clinically. Their needs rarely match the theories or studies intended to explain them. For example, although Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) is the most commonly diagnosed ED in clinical settings, ranging from 50 to 70% of all ED cases (Walsh & Sysko, 2009), research studies rarely include this diagnostic category. While more recent research is beginning to explore the complexities of EDNOS (Agras, Crow, Mitchell, Halmi & Bryson, 2010; Walsh, 2009; Wildes & Marcus, 2010), little is yet known about how this largest subgroup of ED patients progresses through the illness, responds to treatment, and fares in terms of outcome. Recent data seem to

confirm what we have known clinically: many patients with EDNOS actually have poorer outcomes and higher mortality rates than patients with AN or BN (Crow, Peterson, Swanson, Raymond & Specker, 2009). A multitude of other factors contribute to the research/practice gap. Despite the fact that many of our patients suffer from comorbid conditions, treatment research in our field tends to look at these problems more singularly (Haas & Clopton, 2003; Thompson-Brenner & Westen, 2005; Tobin, 2007). In clinical practice, it is often these comorbid factors, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, that dominate the process of therapeutic engagement. The process of engagement is known to be difficult in patients with ED, and adapting to the special demands of a patient’s comorbidities makes each treatment relationship unique. This sense of uniqueness can create the perception that research does not easily, or often, apply to the individual patient with whom we sit. Furthermore, in clinical research trials, “relatively ‘pure’ groups of homogenous patients are selected for study, and are offered standardized treatment based on structured manuals. Everyone knows that therapy in the real world is far messier” (Herbert, Neeren & Lowe, 2007, p. 15). We designed this book with the clear intention of trying to bridge such gaps so that research can better inform clinical work, and clinical work can better inform the research agenda and process.

xxi

xxii

INTRODUCTION

A historical view may help us to create the most-informed approaches to the field’s current dilemmas. In her review of four decades of work, Hilda Bruch (1985), the pioneer to whom the field owes great respect and gratitude, identified the nature/nurture debate as a concerning gap. In her hopeful assessment, the two dimensions had finally found common ground. “Recent explorations of the neurochemical processes of the brain have revealed the close association of psychological experiences with alterations in brain metabolism, rendering the old dichotomy between physiological and psychological events untenable” (Bruch, 1985, pp. 8e9). The biopsychosocial model (Johnson & Connors, 1987; Lucas, 1981; Yager, 1982; Yager, Rudnick & Metzner, 1981) advanced this perspective and our understanding of ED, laying the groundwork for prolific empirical contributions in the subsequent decades. The field rigorously researched areas of pressing concern including, but not limited to: prevention; medical and psychiatric management; therapeutic tools and approaches; neuroscience and epigenetics; and the essential role of the family in the ED treatment and recovery process. In the clinical realm, innovative treatment approaches began to yield more positive outcomes. The dialectic of the past decade, the science/practice gap, parallels, if not harks back to, that of Bruch’s generation of ED specialists. Despite Bruch’s prescient respect for the neuroscientific basis of psychological experience, integration of this work, and its implications for the therapeutic process, is relatively recent in the ED field. Although we cannot expect neuroscience to be the ultimate mediator for researchers and clinicians of discrepant viewpoints, it has undoubtedly provided a language and medium for professionals in both “camps” to appreciate the other’s contributions to the understanding

of the etiology and treatment of ED. Nearly 30 years have passed since Bruch’s review, and the resurgence of interest in neuroscientific applications/understandings of ED, and in patients’ subjective experiences, provides rich opportunities for collaboration between researchers and clinicians. Today, we have the advantage of a knowledge base built on many more years of inquiry than Dr. Bruch and the other early writers had available to them. There are three scholarly journals dedicated solely to ED: Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention (EDJTP), the International Journal of Eating Disorders (IJED), and the European Eating Disorders Review. Since the 1980s, approximately 1000 books have been published specifically regarding ED or closely related illnesses. EDJTP has published about 750 articles, and IJED has published approximately 1200 (L. Cohn, personal communication, January 28, 2010). Broadening the topic to body image, health psychology, obesity, or related areas, these numbers would vastly increase, but still do not reflect publications in a wide variety of basic science, psychiatric, medical, nutritional, and psychological journals. The point is that the ED field is relatively young and rapidly developing, with many talented clinicians and researchers whose contributions have the potential to bridge the current gaps, better serving the needs of our patients. Helene Deutsch, the first psychoanalyst to specialize in the treatment of women, has been credited with saying, “after all, the ultimate goal of all research is not objectivity, but truth” (retrieved from: http://www. brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/h/helene_ deutsch.html). Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the Research/Practice Gap brings together the expertise of scientists and practitioners in an effort to further describe the truth about ED. Readers will find an

INTRODUCTION

unexpected irony: the effect of closing gaps also expands the realm of influence, information, and expertise across disciplines. Researchers will find accounts of the practiced experience and wisdom of clinicians who have been operating with skills and perspectives only partially informed by science. Likewise, clinicians will be exposed to scientific advances that have enriched our understanding of the biopsychosocial complexity of ED. Some of this research has substantiated the central role of the therapeutic relationship (American Psychiatric Association, 2006), and qualitative research is now giving the patient/subject an active voice and presence in the empirical process. Readers will have access to chapters across a variety of topics where research and clinical work must come together to better shape the understanding, treatment, and outcome of ED. In light of the significant proportion of EDNOS cases, we encouraged our contributors to take a transdiagnostic approach (Fairburn & Cooper, 2007) when possible. We are also intrigued by the proposed alternative system for classification, Broad Categories for the Diagnosis of Eating Disorders (Walsh & Sysko, 2009). While the American Psychiatric Association refines its work on the DSM-V, many diagnostic issues are being considered, and it is premature to discuss the changes; however, we deeply appreciate the efforts of the ED work group. The collaborative spirit of this book reflects our view that EDs are complex, multidetermined illnesses that must be understood and treated in the sociopolitical context. Effective treatment takes a team that includes the patient, the family, and a multidisciplinary group of clinicians working in concert. Successful recovery takes a village, interlocking communities of support (e.g. extended family, peers, team-mates, social networks, professional support) in which

xxiii

patients practice their recovery skills, and find vital sources of commonality, connection, optimism, and accountability. We hope that this book conveys respect for the daunting power of these illness processes, as well as the healing power of clinicians, researchers, patients, and families combining forces toward a common goal. Readers will note recurring references to the importance of the clinical relationship, based on empathy, connection, compassion, respect, and affection, as well as the importance of using that relationship to best implement interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness (Zerbe, 2008). Furthermore, we hope a spirit of partnership emerges from this bookdpartnership between families and professionals, and between researchers and practitioners. Ideally, Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the Research/Practice Gap, will help us to transcend the historical tensions and competitive relationships between researchers and practitioners in our field (Banker & Klump, 2007), and inspire us to proceed with collaborative efforts that appreciate and integrate the best from each domain’s perspective. A paradigmatic shift of this magnitude, involving change in attitude and practice both within and between disciplines, will require more than an academic tome devoted to its necessity. As the final chapter of this book illustrates, we are called to action or we will remain a field destructively divided. As editors, we also are aware of the limits of this volume. For example, the diversity, or the evolving face, of ED, is a critical issue beyond the scope of this book. Once the purview of young Caucasian women from higher socio-economic strata in the advanced technological nations, EDs are now global conditions occurring in over 40 countries, many of which are developing nations (Gordon, 2001). In their examination

xxiv

INTRODUCTION

of how culture, ethnicity, difference, and EDs affect minority and non-western females, Nasser and Malson (2009) state: The spread of thinness as a master signifier of feminine beauty, promulgated by the mass media and the post-colonial operations of transnational capital, across all sections of western societies and across the world has been devastatingly effective in the ‘globalisation’ of ‘eating disordered’ subjectivities and practices.Thinness as a gendered body ‘ideal’ and a signifier of a multiplicity of positively construed ‘attributes’ can clearly no longer be considered exclusively western or white (p. 82).

Confirming this significant change in the face of ED, Grabe and Hyde (2006) conducted a meta-analysis of 98 studies, finding no significant differences in body dissatisfaction between Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women in the USA. Also, Bisaga et al. (2005) found similar rates of disordered eating (DE) across ethnicities in adolescent girls. Despite clinical impressions clearly confirmed by research, regarding the diverse presentation of ED, minority women experience worrisome barriers to their access to care, especially due to lack of recognition by providers (Cachelin & Striegel-Moore, 2006). Many of these same issues are factors in the underdiagnosis and treatment of men with ED. We must challenge these outdated stereotypes so all patients will be able to receive appropriate diagnosis and care. Clearly, the field has much to learn about how EDs present across culture, country, ethnicity, and other divisions. We must begin to acknowledge that EDs no longer belong to a place, but instead inhabit many different and constantly evolving global social spheres. Nasser and Malson (2009) advise us to attend to both global and local factors in our attempts to understand ED. They explain that the “gendered aesthetics of thinness” are not always central to the DE or self starvation and that other “locally-specific

discursive constructions of self-starvation may be more relevant” (p. 82). The above findings remind us that our culture continues to drive vulnerable men and women into DE and ED. Although there seems to be a decreased appreciation for these sociocultural forces, enduring gender role stereotypes remain influential. Culture and diversity are enormously complex issues and, while we believe strongly in their importance in a discussion about ED, we could not do them full justice in this volume. Despite this noted limitation, Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the Research/Practice Gap, presents a range of topics critically illuminating the challenge of clinical work with ED patients. The informed clinician needs to be conversant with multiple literatures including research on the cultural, psychological, behavioral, medical, genetic, neurological, and spiritual dimensions of ED. If nothing else, this volume should put to rest the notion that there is any real dichotomy between the biology and the psychology of lived experience. We believe, also, that there is no validity to the dichotomy between clinical practice and research; it is, rather, the lack of resources, inadequate dialogue, disparate languages, and varied systems of inquiry that create this divisive impression (Banker & Klump, 2007). Clinicians collect data every day informing their sense of what does and does not help particular patients and families. Meanwhile, researchers are developing and refining methods of inquiry that allow for more relevant applications of evidence-based practices into naturalistic settings (Lowe, Bunnell, Neeren, Chernyak & Greberman, 2010). Historical differences between the two camps regarding what constitutes meaningful “evidence,” or sources of information (e.g., clinical vs. empirical data) have impeded integrative, clinically driven investigations. Advances in qualitative and phenomenological

INTRODUCTION

research have begun to mediate this impasse and should be further incorporated into formal quantitative explorations (Jarman & Walsh, 1999; Kazdin, 2009). As Banker and Klump (2007) aptly state, it is time for a “researcher-clinician rapprochement” (p. 14). Finally, the need to bridge the science/ practice gap does not devalue either domain’s distinct and relative merits, nor does it negate the necessity for interdisciplinary debate. In fact, as Nobel prize winner Ilya Prigogine has asserted, a certain degree of friction is vital for growth: It is precisely the quality of fragility, the capacity for being ‘shaken up,’ that is paradoxically the key to growth. Any structuredwhether at the molecular, chemical, physical, social, or psychological leveldthat is insulated from disturbance is also protected from change (Levoy, 1997, p. 8).

Change, and exchangedin perspectives, attitudes, and practicesdis the bridge this volume endeavors to create. It is no longer acceptable to rely on research that does not reflect clinical realities; thanks to the efforts of our authors and many other colleagues, we see promising signs that this gap is closing. Nor is it acceptable for therapists to base their treatment approaches solely on their own clinical intuition (Herbert et al., 2007). The research cited in this volume supporting innovative clinical work demonstrates the merits of Evidence Based Treatment (EBT) and the importance of incorporating EBT into treatment plans (Haas & Clopton 2003; Mussell, Crosby, Crow, Knopke & Peterson, 2000; Tobin, Banker, Weisberg & Bowers, 2007). Working from one theoretical perspective because that is how you were trained is no longer defensible. Clinicians need to be able to explain their rationale for their treatment approach and recommendations, and those explanations

xxv

need to incorporate both science and clinical intuition. The following contributions seek to insure that researchers and clinicians are cross-trained in the best practices of ED treatment, building bridges that can withstand the inherent friction required for growth, and paving the way for future advances.

References Agras, W. S., Crow, S., Mitchell, J., Halmi, K., & Bryson, S. (2010). A 4-year prospective study of eating disorder NOS compared with full eating disorder syndromes. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 565e570. American Psychiatric Association. (2006). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). American Journal of Psychiatry, 1101e1185. Banker, J., & Klump, K. (2007, Winter). Toward a common ground: Bridging the gap between research and practice in the field of eating disorders. Perspectives, 12e14. Bisaga, K., Whitaker, A., Davies, M., Chuang, S., Feldman, J., & Walsh, B. T. (2005). Eating disorder and depressive symptoms in urban high school girls from different ethnic backgrounds. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26, 257e266. Bruch, H. (1985). Four decades of eating disorders. In D. Garner & P. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Cachelin, F. M., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (2006). Help seeking and barriers to treatment in a community sample of Mexican American and European American women with eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39, 154e161. Crow, S. C., Peterson, C. B., Swanson, S. A., Raymond, N. C., Specker, S., Eckert, E. D., & Mitchell, J. E. (2009). Increased mortality in bulimia nervosa and other eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 1342e1346. Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2007). Thinking afresh about the classification of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S107eS110. Gordon, R. A. (2001). Eating disorders East and West: A culture-bound syndrome unbound. In M. Nasser, M. A. Katzman, & R. A. Gordon (Eds.), Eating disorders and cultures in transition (pp. 1e23). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.

xxvi

INTRODUCTION

Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2006). Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 622e640. Haas, H., & Clopton, J. (2003). Comparing clinical and research treatments for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 413e420. Herbert, J. D., Neeren, A. M., & Lowe, M. R. (2007, Winter). Clinician intuition and scientific evidence: What is their role in treating eating disorders. Perspectives, Winter, 15e17. Jarman, M., & Walsh, S. (1999). Evaluating recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Integrating lessons learned from research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 773e788. Johnson, C., & Connors, M. E. (1987). The etiology and treatment of bulimia nervosa: A biopsychosocial perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books. Kazdin, A. (2009). Bridging science and practice to improve patient care. American Psychologist, 64, 276e278. Levoy, G. (1997). Callings: Finding and following an authentic life. New York, NY: Harmony Books. Lowe, M. R., Bunnell, D. W., Neeren, A. M., Chernyak, Y., & Greberman, L. (2010). Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of cognitive-behavior therapy efficacy research on eating disorders: A case study from a community-based clinical setting. International Journal of Eating Disorders. (Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/eat.20782). Lucas, A. R. (1981). Toward the understanding of anorexia nervosa as a disease entity. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 56(4), 254e264. Mussell, M. P., Crosby, R. D., Crow, S. J., Knopke, A. J., Peterson, C. B., Wonderlich, S. A., & Mitchell, J. E. (2000). Utilization of empirically supported psychotherapy treatments for individuals with eating disorders: A survey of psychologists. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 230e237. Nasser, M., & Malson, H. (2009). Beyond western dis/ orders: Thinness and self-starvation of other-ed women. In H. Malson & M. Burns (Eds.), Critical

feminist approaches to eating dis/orders (pp. 74e86). London, UK: Routledge. Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf. Thompson-Brenner, H., & Westen, D. (2005). A naturalistic study of psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa: Comorbidity and therapeutic outcome: Part 1 & 2. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 193, 573e594. Tobin, D. L. (2007, Winter). Research and practice in eating disorders: The clinician’s dilemma. Perspectives, 8e10. Tobin, D. T., Banker, J. D., Weisberg, L., & Bowers, W. (2007). I know what you did last summer (and it was not CBT): A factor analytic model of international psychotherapeutic practice in the eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 754e757. Walsh, B. T. (2009). Eating disorders in DSM-V: Review of the existing literature (Part 1). International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 579e580. Walsh, T., & Sysko, R. (2009). Broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED): An alternative system for classification. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(8), 754e764. Wildes, J. E., & Marcus, M. D. (2010). Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment planning for binge-eating disorder and eating disorder not otherwise specified. In C. Grilo & J. E. Mitchell (Eds.), The treatment of eating disorders: A clinical handbook (pp. 44e65). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Yager, J. (1982). Family issues in the pathogenesis of anorexia nervosa. Psychosomatic Medicine, 44, 43e60. Yager, J., Rudnick, F. D., & Metzner, R. J. (1981). Anorexia nervosa: A current perspective and some new directions. In E. Serafetinides (Ed.), Psychiatric research in practice: Biobehavioral contributions (pp. 131e150). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton. Zerbe, K. (2008). Integrated treatment of eating disorders: Beyond the body betrayed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

C H A P T E R

1 A Perfect Biopsychosocial Storm Gender, Culture, and Eating Disorders Margo Maine and Douglas W. Bunnell Although eating disorder(s) (ED) are multidetermined, biopsychosocial disorders, gender alone remains the single-best predictor of their risk (Striegel-Moore & Bulik, 2007). Most research asserts that anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) are 10 times more common in females than males, and binge-eating disorder (BED) is three times more common (Treasure, 2007). While some have argued that one in six cases occurs in males (Andersen, 2002), the gender disparity is still glaring. Furthermore, while ED is not the only gendered psychiatric condition, the degree of gender disparity is much greater than in most diagnoses (Levine & Smolak, 2006). Now the third most common illness in adolescent females (Fisher et al., 1995), superseded only by diabetes and asthma, ED have become a major public health issue, affecting more and more women of all ages. Today they appear in every stratum of American culture and, with the impact of globalization, in more than 40 countries worldwide (Gordon, 2001). This exponential increase in a condition disproportionately affecting women must have its roots in the interplay of culture and gender, as a genetic mutation has not swept the globe. But media images of perfectly crafted female bodies and unprecedented role change have, in fact, swept the globe. The increased access to education and involvement in the workplace have transformed women’s social roles dramatically, with rapid technological and market changes introducing a powerful global consumer culture and relentless expectations about appearance and beauty (Gordon, 2001). As the social changes accelerate, many women seek solace and mastery by controlling their bodies (Maine & Kelly, 2005). Quite simply, gender creates risk. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) evidencebased review of women’s mental health (World Health Organization, 2000) concludes that gender is the strongest determinant of mental health, social position, and status, as well as the strongest determinant of exposure to events and conditions endangering mental health and stability. Furthermore, the WHO notes a positive relationship between the frequency and severity of social stressors and the frequency and severity of mental health problems in women. Despite the importance of gender disparities in mental health and risk for ED, the recent emphasis on biogenetic research risks minimizing the importance of the role of

Treatment of Eating Disorders doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375668-8.10001-4

3

Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc.

4

1. A PERFECT BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL STORM

culture and gender in their etiology. As clinicians, we understand that the biopsychosocial whole is greater than the sum of its parts, despite the challenges this presents to the traditional research paradigms. This chapter explores the interplay of biopsychosocial factors contributing to the perfect storm of ED, especially examining culture and gender.

NATURE VERSUS NURTURE: A FALSE DICHOTOMY Delineations between the biological, psychological, and social forces underlying ED are false distinctions, as nature and nurture always go hand in hand. Genes code RNA and DNA, the building blocks of cells, creating variations associated with risk. While they do not code behavior or disease, genes create vulnerabilities which will be tempered or intensified by other factors (Chavez & Insel, 2007), such as the family, early development, social experiences and expectations, physical conditions, and gender. Increasingly sophisticated research models investigate the complicated interactions in which environmental experience can alter gene expression (Hunter, 2005). Although they are not destiny, genes shape vulnerability and resilience, affecting how we perceive, organize, and respond to experiences, and contributing to the perfect storm of ED. The rapid decline in the age at which girls enter puberty is an apt example of such a biopsychosocial storm. A century ago, the average age for menarche was 14.2 and now it is 12.3. In the 1970s, the average age of breast development was 11.5, but by 1997, it was less than 10 years old for Caucasian girls and 9 years old for African American girls, with a significant number developing even before age 8 (Steingraber, 2009). Girls who enter puberty earlier than peers have more self-esteem issues, anxiety, depression, adjustment reactions, eating disorders, and suicide attempts (Graber, Seeley, Brooks-Gunn & Lewinsohn, 2004). They are more likely to use drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, have earlier sexual experiences, be at increased risk of physical violence, and, due to prolonged estrogen exposure, have a higher incidence of breast cancer (Steingraber, 2009). Early puberty may be best understood as an ecological disorder, an interaction of psychosocial, nutritional and environmental triggers, such as pollutants or chemical exposure; while family stress or trauma may also play a part. Aptly describing the false dichotomy between nature and nurture, Steingraber states: “The entire hormonal system has been subtly rewired by modern stimuli.female sexual maturation is not controlled by a ticking clock. It’s more like a musical performance with girls’ bodies as the keyboards and the environment as the pianist’s hands” (2009, p. 52). Sexual maturation brings increased attention to the body, sexuality, and the developmental pressures of adolescence, enhancing the impact of other ED risk-factors. Nature and nurture interact as girls’ lives unfold.

GENDER: DIFFERENCE OR SIMILARITY? Culturally constructed sexism has led to intense divisions between men and women, as expressed in common concepts such as “the war of the sexes,” as if gender creates virtually different species with no hope of understanding each other. The media systematically

I. BRIDGING THE GAP: THE OVERVIEW

NATURE, NURTURE, AND THE BRAIN

5

promulgate gender differences, just as they have contributed to the objectification of women and sexism. Despite the popularity of books like Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus (Gray, 1995) and You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation (Tannen, 2001), decades of psychological research suggest that men and women and boys and girls are much more alike than different (Hyde, 2005). In their epic work, The Psychology of Sex Differences, Maccoby and Jacklin (1974) reviewed more than 2000 studies, dismissing many popular beliefs and identifying only four areas of difference: (i) verbal ability; (ii) visual-spatial ability; (iii) mathematical ability; and (iv) aggression. In 2005, Hyde’s meta-analysis of the gender difference literature found that 78% of the differences are very small, actually close to zero, even in areas where gender differences have been consistently considered strong. The greatest gender difference is in motor performance, due to post-puberty differences in muscle mass and bone size. Measures of sexuality, especially the frequency of masturbation and attitudes toward “casual sex,” also reveal significant gender differences, but virtually no difference in reported sexual satisfaction. The metaanalysis of aggression indicates a strong gender difference in physical parameters, but less so with verbal aggression. Despite the suggestion in the popular press and media that girls have a higher level of relational aggression, the evidence is mixed. As gender differences fluctuate over the course of development, Hyde (2005) suggests that they are not as fixed as many believe. She also notes that the surrounding context, such as the written instructions, interactions between participant and experimenter, or expectations of gender differences, significantly affect results. The fact that both their strength and their direction depends on context challenges the notion of strong, stable gender differences.

NATURE, NURTURE, AND THE BRAIN Research on the brain indicates important gender differences, despite the behavioral similarities noted above. In a thorough review of gender, Cahill (2006) noted significant gendered patterns in brain structure and neurochemistry associated with a wide range of emotional and cognitive functions including learning, emotional and social processing, memory storage, and decision-making. Male and female brains react differently to stress. Chronic stress is more damaging to the male brain, particularly to the hippocampal area thought to be central to memory and learning, while transitory interpersonal stressors result in a stronger adrenocortical response in women’s brains (Stroud, 1999). At the neurochemical level, gender influences the ways in which our brains synthesize, metabolize, and respond to neurotransmitters such as serotonin, possibly helping to explain differential rates of mood disorders and substance addiction. Brain differences have been disproportionately attributed to sex hormones, but research has now established that other distinctions exist. For example, the denser corpus callosum (the band of fibers bridging the brain’s hemispheres) in the female brain allows greater connection between the two hemispheres, so women have less lateral specialization, whereas men have more of a division between the brain hemispheres. These neuroanatomical differences may explain women’s superior language skills and men’s superior visual-spatial skills. The neuroanatomy of the hypothalamus, instrumental in hormonal functions and reproduction, is also different, resulting in neurophysiological differences that in turn affect behavior.


6


The anterior cingulate gyrus, more active in women, is linked to nurturant social behaviors, while the amygdyla (more active in men) is linked to anger and rage. Although statistically significant, these differences are small (Solms & Turnbull, 2002). The environment and culture often intensify these differences with gender-laden messages, attitudes, and expectations, and thereby multiply their expression (Lee, 2007). While the study of brain gender differences has been enhanced by technological developments, it has, perhaps, been retarded by the viewpoint that differences somehow imply deficiency. In a patriarchic culture, an androcentric bias may affect how scientific findings and models of psychopathology are interpreted.

GENDERING: A BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL PROCESS Is it a boy or a girl? This is often the first question asked about the birth or pending birth of a baby. The answer shapes our reaction and expectations and impacts the child’s life story and experience in countless ways. Simply put, the impact of gender occurs early and often. According to social scientists, “gendering” is “the sum of all influences. that channel females and males into divergent life situations,” which are then internalized into the self, leading to certain “sex-linked characteristics, cognitions, and interpersonal transactions” (Worell & Todd, 1996, p.135). By age 2, gender identity begins to emerge, with the child constructing a sense of self as either male or female (Worell & Todd, 1996). Gender experiences interact with the gendered features of the brain to create a gendered self, and relationships with caregivers are the key arenas for these experiences to play out. Illustrating the intersections of culture, biology, and psychology, parental responses to an infant are driven by the parent’s biology, by their cultural and psychological experiences, and by the gendered biology of the infant. According to Weinberg, Tronick, Cohn & Olson (1999), male and female infants display markedly different levels of emotional expressivity and arousal and evoke different parental reactions. Boys, who are less regulated, are actually more sociable than girls at this age. They seem to pull for more physical touch and perhaps greater relational involvement from their mothers due to the challenge of maintaining emotional regulation. Weinberg and her colleagues also found that boys and mothers stayed in attachment synchrony more than motheredaughter dyads but also took longer times to re-establish that synchrony after it had been disrupted. Girls, by comparison, require less soothing but also seem to present more subtle cues to their caregivers. Perhaps our belief that girls and women are more relational is rooted, at least in part, in the need for closer attention to these subtle expressions. Boys may be less relational because their emotions are so obvious. In order to develop a sense of self, boys must psychologically separate from their primary attachment, usually their mother, and connect to the same sex figure, the father. Girls, on the other hand, must retain the connection to mother as the same sex identificatory figure but connect to the father in a new affective relationship. This developmental challenge places a premium on relational, as opposed to self-containing and separating, capabilities. Girls begin to explore who they are and who they want to be by comparing themselves with peers, parents, siblings, and the cultural images available to them (like characters in books or movies). Boys learn to harden themselves into self-sufficiency, fearful that dependence is shameful.


PSYCHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN A GENDERED ENVIRONMENT

7

In optimal circumstances, these developmental challenges inter-twine with biological endowments and social values in ways that enhance and support healthy maturation. The environment can be more or less gendered, either reinforcing stereotypic behavior or allowing more room for difference or exploration. Individuals can also adjust their gender-typed behaviors in order to present in a certain way. For example, girls may act more typically feminine to get approval or attention pending the cues and demands they perceive. When psychopathology develops, it may reflect disruptions in this complicated process. When the psychopathology occurs at vastly different rates in men and women, the biopsychosocial construction of gender may be the source.

PSYCHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN A GENDERED ENVIRONMENT Western culture is still androcentric, based on a patriarchy, as seen in our common language forms (think “chairman” of the board). Such gendered environments exert subtle, subliminal, but constant pressures on both sexes to act in certain ways. Gender stereotypes evolve based on a culture’s belief systems regarding the attitudes, behaviors, and other characteristics that seem to differentiate the two sexes. This section focuses primarily on how gendering affects females, while Chapter 18 (Bunnell) examines the male experience and consequent risks for ED. Frequent references to “the opposite sex” show our polarizing views of gender. Western culture usually emphasizes socio-emotional and body image (BI) issues when defining stereotypic femininity, and competence and autonomy when defining masculinity. These stereotypes prescribe certain behaviors: women are to take care of others and attend to their appearance, while men are to take risks, assume leadership, and focus on success and work. Such dichotomous views of gender give men public power and influence, while limiting them to women, with far-reaching consequences. The impact of a gendered environment may intensify in the face of biopsychosocial developmental stressors. Puberty heralds both internal and external changes, clear markers of gender. For girls, it brings dramatic hormonal changes resulting in menstrual periods, breast development, and increased body fat. Between the ages of 10 and 14, in fact, the average girl gains 10 inches of height and between 40 and 50 pounds. Most double their weight by the time they finish puberty (Friedman, 1997). In addition to the physical events, puberty involves an increased attention to the demands and expectations of the dominant culture, as, emotionally ready or not, girls move from the safety of childhood into a universe increasingly driven by factors outside the family such as peers, school, and the media. This heightened attunement to sociocultural demands or norms creates significant conflict for girls. Absorbing the external message that they need to control their weight and maintain an attractive, sculpted look, girls may feel unhappy about their body’s natural changes. While body fat may be necessary to physical development, it contradicts the female ideals they have been taught, so it seems invalidating and frightening. For some girls, this transition into puberty feels like the proverbial fall down a rabbit-hole, just like Alice in Wonderland, landing in a place where things may look the same but feel very, very different. One young woman in recovery from bulimia described that she went to bed at night after playing with dolls, then woke up with breasts, and everyone treated her differently.


8


With scant permission to explore complicated feelings about their bodies and maturation, and no rituals of celebration for this new life stage, many girls translate their distress and confusion into the language of fat (Friedman, 1997). Constant diet ads and messages about the dangers of obesity, and a weight-loss industry that now accounts for approximately $60 billion per year in the U.S. (Marketdata Enterprises, 2007), only reinforce the language of fat, making dieting normative. Again, the biopsychosocial whole is greater than the sum of the parts: the pressures to diet add to all the other developmental stressors of puberty, as “gendering” unfolds.

MEDIA IMAGES, GENDER, AND OBJECTIFICATION THEORY Experimental and correlational studies, prospective research, and clinical accounts all validate that media images and influences are major factors in the etiology of ED (Levine & Smolak, 2006). American television and other popular media promulgate the strong message that women attract men through appearance. The media objectify women much more frequently than men and portray them as unrealistically thin (Engeln-Maddox, 2006). Meta-analytic reviews of research demonstrate that the contemporary cultural experiences of girls and women contribute to both BI dissatisfaction and to disordered eating (DE) (Murnen & Smolak, 2009). Exposure to mass media (Groesz, Levine & Murnen, 2002; Murnen, Levine, Smith & Groesz, 2007) increases the risk for ED, as do attempts to comply with traditional expectations regarding femininity (Murnen & Smolak, 1997). In essence, Western media systematically and relentlessly objectify and sexualize girls’ and women’s bodies, at great cost to their emotional and physical health (Maine, 2009). Rapid social change, provocative media images, and pressures to attain the perfect body coalesce in the perfect storm of an ED. A dramatic example of the interplay of these factors occurred in Fiji after television was introduced. ED were basically non-existent there in 1995, but after less than three years of limited exposure to Western network television shows, they were rampant. Fijian girls had not spoken of diet or weight concerns previously but, by 1998, 11% used selfinduced vomiting, 29% were at risk for ED, 69% had dieted to lose weight, and 74% felt “too fat.” Watching popular female images on television seemed to have created a desire for the apparent life and presumed power of these stars and a commitment to change their bodies to get it. Once a culture where large female bodies were valued for their strength and contribution to the family and community life, and where food was celebrated and enjoyed with rich traditions and meanings, the Fijian experience demonstrates how rapidly cultural influences can overturn strong local cultural traditions and values, profoundly altering a woman’s relationship to her body and to food (Becker, Burwell, Gilman, Herzog & Hamburg, 2002). The media’s objectification and sexualization of the female body has a lasting impact, persistently pressuring girls and women to assume an external view of themselves and of their value as people. In turn, they are less able to identify, express, process, or respect their emotions, thoughts, and instincts. Messages from the outside eclipse any inner life; in this way, social expectations regarding appearance, weight, and shape become pre-eminent, trumping women’s appreciation for their natural bodies and paving the way for BI preoccupation and dissatisfaction, and eating pathology. Contemporary culture’s consistent sexualization of girls and women exerts a variety of individual harmful effects such as impaired cognitive functioning due to intrusive and


GENDER DISTINCTIONS AND THE OUTCOME OF OBJECTIFICATION

9

negative thoughts, emotional distress, body dissatisfaction, negative self image, ED, and health problems (American Psychological Association [APA], 2007b). Objectification theory (Frederickson & Roberts, 1997) explains the lasting negative outcomes of such sexualization, especially the impact of media images and portrayals of women and the power of the sexual gaze. Girls come to see themselves as objects to be looked at and judged based on their appearance. Internalization of an external standard results in constant monitoring and self-scrutiny, so the individual has fewer resources for awareness of internal body states and experience. Thereby, the culture disrupts the connection to inner experience leading to a pervasive experience of disembodiment (Piran & Cormier, 2005), including denial of basic needs such as hunger and thirst.

GENDER DISTINCTIONS AND THE OUTCOME OF OBJECTIFICATION Gender significantly affects the experience and outcome of objectification. According to Murnen, Smolak, Mills & Good (2003), children as young as 7 idealize objectified media images. Girls, however, are more likely to internalize and try to meet these idealized standards. Starting in childhood, girls are constantly exposed to criticisms and comments about their bodies, and not just in the media. Even in elementary school, boys feel free to disparage girls’ bodies in their presence (Murnen & Smolak, 2000). With both anonymous and deeply personal messages conveying a constant stream of criticism, the average American girl struggles to simply feel safe in her own skin. Studying children at age 11 and then at 13, Grabe, Hyde & Lindberg (2007) report that objectification appears to affect the emotional well-being of girls but not of boys. Adolescence and pre-adolescence are critical developmental periods for girls in their relationship to their bodies and their experience of objectification. Adolescent girls endure much more self-objectification, body shame, rumination, and depression than their male peers. In desperation, they internalize and try to meet the external standards, hoping to find safety and self-acceptance. Instead, they become deeply disconnected from their bodies, creating fertile ground for an ED. Bandura’s (1991) groundbreaking research demonstrates that when people fail to meet cultural ideals, intrusive thoughts can undermine cognitive functions. For women, such failure has a higher price, literally and figuratively. Cultural standards for appearance, weight, and beauty are much more rigid for women, so they experience more BI dissatisfaction than men (Ricciardelli & McCabe, 2004). In addition to their bodies being treated so differently, women also earn less, have less status and power, and are more likely to be victims of abuse and physical violence (Bordo, 1993). Intrusive and obsessive self-disparaging thoughts, absent from other areas in which they feel successful, can easily compromise their sense of self as well as their cognitive and emotional functioning. According to Tiggemann and Slater (2001), the cumulative effect of self-objectification creates risk for three psychological issues: depression, sexual dysfunction, and ED. Selfobjectification may become an internalized and long-lasting feature of the self, co-existing with many risk factors associated with ED, including diminished interoceptive awareness, poor self-esteem, body shame, and DE (Piran & Cormier, 2005). The internalization of the


10


thin ideal, a predictable indirect result of self-objectification for girls in contemporary culture (Levine & Smolak, 2006), is one of the strongest predictors for BI distress and DE (Stice, 2002). The effects of culture’s objectification of girls and other prominent gender stereotyping not only harm girls; they foster a sexist or patriarchal culture that tolerates sexual harassment, violence, abuse, rape, and exploitation of girls and women (APA, 2007b). Sexism, however, is truly “a two-edged sword” (Sadker, Sadker & Zittleman, 2009, p. 208), victimizing boys and men as well. If girls must be objectified, boys must be objectifying, insensitive, and dismissive; if girls are to be harmed, then boys must harm through aggressive, insensitive, angry, and rejecting behaviors. Pushed to be independent, competitive, athletic, and disconnected from their own inner states much of the time, boys are also harmed by the culture’s sexualization and objectification of women.

FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES: PROTECTION IN THE FACE OF OBJECTIFICATION? Murnen and Smolak (2009) suggest that women who identify with feminism may be more resilient and less likely to succumb to concerns about BI or eating. Their hypothesis, that a feminist perspective may help girls resist objectification and other cultural forces that create risk for ED, has important implications for treatment and prevention. A feminist perspective may enable women to conceptualize objectification and cultural pressures related to weight, shape, and appearance as examples of the oppression of women, and may foster a critical perspective of media images for women, encouraging women to reject these messages or to limit exposure to them. When experiencing sexual harassment or any form of sexual discrimination, a feminist consciousness may help the individual to contextualize and externalize the experience rather than internalize or blame herself. This mindset also empowers a woman to define herself in areas of strength, rather than by focusing on imperfections, and to value internal attributes more than appearance. They also may be more capable of asserting themselves, expressing their beliefs, and avoiding the self-silencing that can lead to DE (Smolak & Munstertieger, 2002). In focus groups, college-aged women who endorsed a feminist perspective were more likely to embrace body diversity and to be aware of the negative messages women receive about their bodies (Rubin, Nemeroff, & Russo, 2004). Feminism allowed them to resist the objectifying and sexualizing male gaze, to be more confident of their bodies, and to redefine beauty. Yet, despite such resilient attitudes, these women still felt pressured to comply with cultural values regarding women and weight. Other research using quantitative measures has been inconsistent. Tiggemann and Stevens (1999) reported a moderate positive association between feminist identity and BI, while Cash, Ancis & Strachan (1997) reported only a minimal association. To shed light on the protective potential of feminism, Murnen and Smolak (2007) conducted a meta-analysis of 26 studies examining the link between feminism and BI, concluding that feminist identity and a lower drive for thinness go hand in hand. Adoption of a feminist perspective seemed to immunize women against the internalization of unhealthy attitudes about their bodies. Older feminists, lesbians, women’s studies students, and activists derive the most benefit from their association with feminism, while younger women, or those less connected to feminism, struggle more with the pressures to be thin. A consolidated feminist


GENDER-INFORMED TREATMENT

11

identity, however, appeared to be a protective factor against dieting and ED symptoms, suggesting the value of a feminist-informed approach to treatment and prevention. While the medical model focuses on the individual woman as sick or defective and attempts to subdue her disease, the feminist framework literally frames the woman’s ED and behavior in the context of her cultural experience (Maine, 2009). Feminist-informed therapists recognize that the common issues prompting women to seek therapy are often related to powerlessness, experiences of trauma, low self-esteem, and the idealization of masculine qualities and the devaluation of feminine ones (Katzman, Nasser & Noordenbos, 2007). In other words, sexism and oppression bring women into treatment. The feminist frame conceptualizes an ED as a solution to these problems, rather than being the problem itself. Moving far beyond symptom management, feminist-oriented treatment requires exploring the impact of gender-prescribed roles in contemporary culture and of the idealization of the masculine and devaluation of the feminine. Rather than pathologizing, a feminist approach is strength-based so women’s needs for emotional connection and interdependence are seen as assets, not signs of weakness or dependency (Katzman et al., 2007; Sesan, 1994). These strengths are incorporated into treatment plans by encouraging interpersonal connections, utilizing group therapies, and including natural support systems such as families or friends. Furthermore, to counter the impact of objectification, involvement in collective social action may enhance recovery, restoring power and voice to the individual and a sense of connection to other like-minded people. The feminist frame is also attuned to power, acknowledging the clinician’s implicit power and the patient’s likely chronic experiences of disempowerment (Sesan, 1994). Strategies to minimize the power differential include constant collaboration between the clinician and the patient and psycho-education, so the patient can make informed decisions about her treatment.

GENDER-INFORMED TREATMENT Each patient brings her own rich constellation of biology, psychology, and culture into treatment, as does each clinician. Mature therapists learn to distinguish between acculturated reactions and their own idiosyncratic reactions by examining questions like: “How am I as a therapist different with male and female patients?” or, “What biases color my reactions?” and, “What gendered expectations do patients have of me?” Male therapists need to introduce these topics into their work with their female patients with ED. Female therapists must model how to work through their own gender biases and experiences and to be open to their patients’ perceptions of body, maternality, sexuality, and experiences of power differentials (Piran, 2001). Even in same sexed therapistepatient pairs, assumptions, values, and biases will shape the relationship. Psychotherapy research suggests that gender-stereotypes in diagnosis and treatment endure, although these may be more subtle than in the past. Women, for instance, are more likely to be diagnosed with Axis II disorders than men (APA, 2007b) and less likely to be diagnosed with PTSD. They also have higher rates of anxiety and depression and other internalizing disorders (Blatt, 2008). Clinicians may tend to attribute women’s psychological disorders to endogenous or intrapsychic factors and minimize the centrality of external forces. On a more subjective level, many still label a female patient’s emotional expressiveness as “needy” or “dependent.”


12


These issues have particular power when treating women with ED. Culture and experience infuse the genetic vulnerabilities of these women with criticism and self-loathing, especially for the body. Consequently, feelings of fatness, fear of weight gain, the over-valuation of thinness, and the panic of fullness evoke a sense of being flawed or unacceptable. Experiences of helplessness, oppression, bias, violence, and trauma all affect self-concept (APA, 2007b). The internalization of the thin body ideal can be equally damaging, as seen in every treatment encounter with ED women. The importance of gender is immediately apparent in the examination of the specific psychopathology of ED (Fairburn, 2008). Young girls are taught to use restraint, especially “dietary” restraint, and to monitor their value by body checking and constant self-scrutiny. While the over-evaluation of thinness, central in the cognitive model of eating pathology, appears to be relevant for both sexes, it is most consistent with the values of the female culture. Any effort to challenge this requires exploration of that patient’s sense of her own gender. Other aspects of eating psychopathology (food avoidance, desire for emptiness, adherence to strict rules, fear of loss of control, avoidance of social eating, guilt and shame about eating) also reflect a gendered indoctrination regarding acceptable female behavior. Conforming to the thin body ideal provides a degree of stability and certainty and choosing to relinquish an ED comes at a high price including mourning, identity confusion, and ambiguity. As, historically, women have paid dearly for such non-conformity, time spent in psychotherapy on the exploration of the social context of gender and ED is time well spent. Psychotherapy must help patients make sense of the biopsychosocial storm that led to their ED, through explicit discussion of what it means to be a woman with all its associated values, dreams, aspirations, hopes, fears, and anxieties. While directive, symptom-focused approaches have demonstrable power to help establish stability and normalization of eating, longer term recovery requires something more subjective. How can patients explore the significance of pleasure, desire, emotional intimacy, and safety if they only talk about eating, weight, and shape? Providing empathy and connection are rarely enough either. Effective treatment demands an integration that simultaneously sustains a collaborative alliance and an explicit push for change. The heart of the psychotherapeutic art conveys empathic acceptance while simultaneously pushing for things to be different. Although researchers continue to explore the power of the therapeutic alliance, we, to date, lack the quantitative sophistication to capture this core feature of therapeutic effectiveness (Maine, 2009). Typically, clinical training and empirical treatment research have focused on the measurable behaviors and symptoms of DE. It is less clear how we can assess the role of relational connection or attachment, flexibility and adaptability in self evaluation, awareness of internal experiences, and issues such as trust, desire, intimacy, values, meaning, and spirituality. All these have a significant connection to gender and may have as much to do with full recovery as does the elimination of specific behaviors (see McGilley and Szablewski, Chapter 12).

ENHANCING GENDER COMPETENCE As gender is a force in all relationships, including psychotherapy, and a core ingredient of the perfect storm of ED, we must appreciate, understand, and use it to enhance recovery.


ENHANCING GENDER COMPETENCE

13

Acknowledging its importance in psychological development and well-being, the American Psychological Association (APA, 2007a) has created guidelines for gender informed treatment, addressing eleven key features of gender “competence.” Each of these dimensions has direct implications for both the specific aspects of eating psychopathology and more general aspects of psychological functioning such as self esteem, trust, safety, and intimacy. The APA stresses that clinicians must attend to these contextualizing factors and evaluate their conceptualizations, etiological models, and treatment approaches using these principles. This is especially critical when treating women with ED. Below we list the core competencies as proposed by APA and relate them to the treatment of ED. • Effects of socialization, stereotyping, and unique life events. Case formulations need to include consideration of gender socialization and stereotyping. How does a woman’s struggle with weight, shape, and eating reflect her sense of being female? • Effects of oppression and bias. As noted earlier, we are at risk for minimizing the effects of oppression and disempowerment on the social, gender, and sexual identity development of our patients with ED. Therapists, too, must stay aware of how these forces impact our own sense of self and our therapeutic interactions • Bias and Discrimination. These forces have demonstrable effects on physical and mental health. As we evaluate our patients, we need to explore the role of these experiences. Is the lack of research and treatment resources for ED an example of bias and discrimination? • Gender Sensitive and Affirming Procedures. Therapists must incorporate explicit techniques that affirm and support girls and women. We should also be continually evaluating our theories and treatment models for negative gender bias • Impact on Therapist’s Practice. This guideline emphasizes the importance of therapist gender and self awareness. How do our own gender biases and experiences influence our work? Their influence is inevitable but we can monitor their effects and become more gender-sensitive • Evidence Based on Gender Sensitive Research. The APA guidelines stress the importance of using gender sensitive research methods. Most of what we know about ED has, obviously, been based on research on women. But, are our methods free of bias? Perhaps the relative de-valuation of qualitative research reflects gender bias that undermines the field’s knowledge and treatment approaches • Promote Initiative and Empowerment. This is particularly relevant in that recovery from an ED requires a shift in self evaluation. Expanding the range of choices and opportunities for women enhances this shift away from a focus on weight, shape, and body as the foundations for self esteem • Assessment and Diagnosis. Sociocultural values may skew assessment of things like emotionality, dependency, lability, and affective intensity. This may affect diagnosis of personality disorder in particular. As these features often accompany eating pathology, ED clinicians must be especially vigilant to their own biases, beliefs, and practices regarding assessment and diagnosis • Sociopolitical context. What starts as a sociocultural attitude or trend can become an internalized constant. In addressing issues of body, eating, self-concept, femininity, or relationships, therapists need to keep their ears open for connections to their patients’ external cultures. How have our patients taken in the messages from the culture and made


14


them their own? How can we best increase their awareness of the power of the sociocultural context? • Identifying Resources for Support. In asking our patients to relinquish their ED, we need to help them incorporate other sources of support into their lives. This guideline pushes the gender sensitive clinician to identify these alternative sources in patient’s relationships and community • Challenging Institutional Bias. This final guideline encourages therapists to actively engage in challenging institutional bias and barriers. Women with ED are marginalized and diminished by the culture. Treatment is hard to access and difficult to afford. Research is underfunded. Even to this day, families, and mostly mothers, are still treated as the cause of ED (Maine, 2004). Therapists must look for opportunities to challenge these biases through advocacy, education, eating disorder prevention, or research. For some patients, the final phase of real recovery may require their own efforts to speak out and challenge the culture in some broader way.

CONCLUSION Gender is a critical factor in ED, as being born female remains the greatest risk factor associated with these diagnoses. It may, however, be both a chicken and an egg, simultaneously creating critical biopsychosocial realities and reflecting them. As contemporary culture promotes an overevaluation of thinness, excessive self-criticism, and disembodiment in women, culture and gender create an essential context for women with ED; therapists must explicitly acknowledge and attend to that context. To explore and acknowledge the power of external factors in the etiology and maintenance of eating pathology does not ignore the significance of biological and genetic vulnerabilities. We miss important aspects of our patients’ lives and of their individual psychology if we minimize the power of the gendered context, including the effects of bias, marginalization, trauma, discrimination, and the roles and rights of women. Effective treatment requires a balance between individual adaptation and cultural gender awareness, and a deep appreciation for all the biopsychosocial elements of the perfect storm of eating disorders.

References Andersen, A. E. (2002). Eating disorders in males. In C. G. Fairburn, & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity (pp. 188e192). New York, NY: Guilford Press. American Psychological Association. (2007a). Guidelines for psychological practice with girls and women. Washington, DC: Author. American Psychological Association. (2007b). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: Author. Bandura, A. (1991). Self-regulation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 69e164). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Becker, A. E., Burwell, R. A., Gilman, S. E., Herzog, D. H., & Hamburg, P. (2002). Eating behaviors and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 509e514.


CONCLUSION

15

Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Blatt, S. (2008). Two primary configurations of psychopathology. In S. Blatt (Ed.), Polarities of experience (pp. 165e199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 477e484. Cash, T. F., Ancis, J. R., & Strachan, M. D. (1997). Gender attitudes, feminist identity, and body images among college women. Sex Roles, 36, 433e447. Chavez, M., & Insel, T. R. (2007). Eating disorders: National Institute of Mental Health’s perspective. American Psychologist, 62(3), 159e166. Engeln-Maddox, R. (2006). Buying a beauty standard or dreaming of a new life? Expectations associated with media ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 258e266. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Fisher, M., Golden, N. H., Katzman, D. K., Kreipe, R. E., Rees, J., Schebendach, J., . Hobesman, H. M. (1995). Eating disorders in adolescents: A background paper. Journal of Adolescent Health, 16, 420e437. Frederickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173e206. Friedman, S. S. (1997). When girls feel fat. Toronto, CA: Harper Collins. Gordon, R. A. (2001). Eating disorders East and West: A culture-bound syndrome unbound. In M. Nasser, M. A. Katzman, & R. A. Gordon (Eds.), Eating disorders and cultures in transition (pp. 1e23). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164e175. Graber, J. A., Seeley, J. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (2004). Is pubertal timing associated with psychopathology in young adulthood? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 718e726. Gray, J. (1995). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effects of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1e16. Hunter, D. J. (2005). Gene-environment interactions in human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 287e298. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581e592. Katzman, M. A., Nasser, M., & Noordenbos, G. (2007). Feminist therapies. In M. Nasser, K. Baistow, & J. Treasure (Eds.), The female body in mind: The interface between the female body and mental health (pp. 205e213). London: Routledge. Lee, T. (2007). When the personal gets in the way of the interpersonal. In M. Nasser, K. Baistow, & J. Treasure (Eds.), The female body in mind: The interface between the female body and mental health (pp. 162e177). London: Routledge. Levine, M. P., & Smolak, L. (2006). The prevention of eating problems and eating disorders: Theory, research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Maine, M. (2004). Father hunger: Fathers, daughters, and the pursuit of thinness. Carlsbad, CA: Gurze. Maine, M. (2009). Beyond the medical model: A feminist frame for eating disorders. In M. Maine, W. M. Davis, & J. Shure (Eds.), Effective clinical practice in the treatment of eating disorders: The heart of the matter (pp. 3e17). New York, NY: Routledge. Maine, M., & Kelly, J. (2005). The body myth: Adult women and the pressure to be perfect. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Marketdata Enterprises. (2007). The U.S. weight loss & diet control market (9th ed.). Market Research Study. Retrieved 5 June 2009 from. www.prwebdirect.com/releases/2007/4/preweb520127.php. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (1997). Femininity, masculinity, and disordered eating: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 231e242. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade-school students: Early socialization of female subordination? Sex Roles, 43, 1e17. Murnen, S. K., Smolak, L., Mills, J. A., & Good, L. (2003). Thin, sexy women and strong, muscular men: Gradeschool children’s responses to objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles, 43, 1e17. Murnen, S. K., Levine, M. P., Smith., J., & Groesz, L. (2007, August). Do fashion magazines promote body dissatisfaction in girls and women? A meta-analytic review. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the American Psychological Association.


16


Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of the relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186e197. Piran, N. (2001). A gendered perspective on eating disorders and disordered eating. In J. Worell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender (pp. 369e378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Piran, N., & Cormier, H. C. (2005). The social construction of women and disordered eating patterns. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 549e558. Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2004). A biopsychosocial model of disordered eating and the pursuit of muscularity in adolescent boys. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 179e205. Rubin, L. R., Nemeroff, C. J., & Russo, N. F. (2004). Exploring feminist women’s body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 27e37. Sadker, D., Sadker, M., & Zittleman, K. (2009). Still failing at fairness. New York, NY: Scribner. Sesan, R. (1994). Feminist inpatient treatment for eating disorders: An oxymoron? In P. Fallon, M. A. Katzman, & S. C. Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 251e271). New York, NY: Guilford. Smolak, L., & Munstertieger, B. F. (2002). The relationship of gender and voice to depression and eating disorders. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 234e241. Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. London, England: Karnac. Steingraber, S. (2009). Girls gone grown-up: Why are U.S. girls reaching puberty earlier and earlier? In S. Olfman (Ed.), The sexualization of childhood (pp. 51e62). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing. Stice, E. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825e848. Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Bulik, C. M. (2007). Risk factors for eating disorders. American Psychologist, 62(3), 181e198. Stroud, L. R. (1999). Sex differences in adrenocortical responses to achievement and interpersonal stressors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1317B. Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. New York, NY: Harper. Tiggeman, M., & Stevens, C. (1999). Weight concerns across the lifespan: Relationship to self-esteem and feminist identity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 103e106. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 57e64. Treasure, J. (2007). The trauma of self-starvation: Eating disorders and body image. In M. Nasser, K. Baistow, & J. Treasure (Eds.), The female body in mind: The interface between the female body and mental health (pp. 57e71). London, England: Routledge. Weinberg, M., Tronick, E., Cohn, J., & Olson, K. (1999). Gender differences in emotional expressivity and selfregulation during early infancy. Developmental Psychology, 35, 175e188. Worell, J., & Todd, J. (1996). Development of the gendered self. In L. Smolak, M. P. Levine, & R. Striegel-Moore (Eds.), The developmental psychopathology of eating disorders: Implications for research, prevention, and treatment (pp. 135e156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. World Health Organization. (2000). Women’s mental health: An evidence based review. Geneva, Switzerland: Mental Health Determinants and Populations, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence.


C H A P T E R

2 What’s Weight Got to Do with It? Weight Neutrality in the Health at Every Size Paradigm and Its Implications for Clinical Practice Deborah Burgard My new client, who is fat, walks into the room, sits down across from me, and says, “Well, as you can see, I’m a compulsive eater.” I am still brought up short by this fairly common opening line. “Ah, well, that is not something one can see with the naked eye,” I say. “Tell me about it.” Our therapy is off and running, characterized from the start by the oppression my client has internalized about her body. She has felt the need to say first what she fears I am diagnosing simply by looking at her. Not knowing quite what to make of my comment, she goes on to tell the story of her problem as she understands it: that despite trying many diets, she has never been able to maintain any lost weight; that she despises herself for not having the control to keep restricting herself on a diet; that her body must be punishing her by making her fat; that she can’t figure out why she can plan to have a “good” day with food and then find herself binging in front of the TV after her roommates have gone to bed; and that she is here because she hopes that understanding the reasons behind her eating habits will allow her to finally be thin and have the life she has dreamed of. She believes that there is something wrong with her self-control that therapy can fix, and her body and her life will be made over. The time we spent initially speaking on the phone, when I told her about the Health at Every Size (HAES) model (Burgard, 2009), summarized in Box 2.1, and that I do not have a way to help her lose weight, has apparently not made a lasting impression. Indeed, we will experience this over and over during the course of our work together. The cultural beliefs about weight (including the meaning of a particular body size; the worth, health, and assumed behaviors of people who are thin versus fat; the power of thinness to confer blessings; the blame on fat for almost anything bad that happens) are almost seamless for most patients. People have their own internal versions of this story. Furthermore, they are surrounded by family, friends, news stories, medical personnel, and even workplace policies that reinforce the ideas that fat is bad, fat people make themselves fat by overeating, fat


17


18

2. WHAT’S WEIGHT GOT TO DO WITH IT?

BOX 2.1

WHAT IS HEALTH AT EVERY SIZE? • Accepting and respecting the diversity of body shapes and sizes • Recognizing that health and well-being are multi-dimensional and that they include physical, social, spiritual, occupational, emotional, and intellectual aspects • Promoting all aspects of health and wellbeing for people of all sizes

• Promoting eating in a manner which balances individual nutritional needs, hunger, satiety, appetite, and pleasure • Promoting individually appropriate, enjoyable, life-enhancing physical activity, rather than exercise that is focused on a goal of weight loss. ASDAH, Health at Every Size (HAES) Principles, www.sizediversityandhealth.org

people will keel over and die, and right living will make everyone thin. Even though I am challenging those beliefs, and my patient is bemused, tolerant, or even agreeing with me while she is in my office, when she gets out the door she defaults back to the dominant cultural views. Several months later, I discover my client’s reaction to my initial comment, when she relates a recent conversation with her mother: I told my mom, when we met that first time, you didn’t assume that I overate. It was so weird, I went home wondering if you knew what you were doing. I mean, how could you not know that I must be overeating, after treating people with eating disorders? But I just felt kind of lighterdit was hard to explain. I guess it felt like maybe there was hopedlike you saw me, not some Big Fat Couch Potato who eats all day.

THE PANIC ABOUT FAT The list of beliefs my patient voices is the same list most people, including health professionals, hold about fat and fat people. At various times, I have observed clinicians and researchers expressing the following: • Body Mass Index (BMI) is a decent proxy for health, and existing categories of BMI accurately reflect risks for health problems and premature death • Behavioral interventions (diet and exercise) will result in weight loss • Health risks for reduced-fat people are the same as those who were never fat • People can maintain weight loss if they try hard enough • Fat people’s bodies, or certainly their appetites, or surely their intake, must be pathological • Fat people are walking time bombs for heart attacks and diabetes


THE PANIC ABOUT FAT

19

• Fat people are weak and self-indulgent; or, in clinical language, they must be more impulsive or less able to inhibit themselves • Therapy will allow people to achieve a “normal” weight by addressing their “issues” • The most important intervention for a fat patient is to help her lose weight, so her life can be worth living. When one begins from a neutral position on these statements, however, and asks for evidence, very little is available; in fact considerable evidence contradicts these assumptions. Many of the assumptions have not been adequately tested because people presume them to be true and not necessary to test in the first place. Others have been inadequately tested because of some common methodological problems: for example, attributing causality to a correlation; not understanding the magnitude of statistical relationships; or using clinical populations and generalizing to fat people in general. And most bewildering, many of the assumptions that have been proven wrong over and over never seem to die. An adequate review of these issues is beyond the scope of this chapter, but Bacon (2008), Campos (2004), and Gaesser (2002) have provided comprehensive analyses of the relevant literature. Their work challenges us to face some important facts about “obesity” if we hope to provide ethical, effective, and safe health care: • No known interventions lead to the long-term achievement of “normal” weight for the great majority of people classified as “obese,” including weight loss surgery (Friedman, 2009; Mann et al., 2007) • The people in the “overweight” and “mildly obese” BMI categories live the longest (Flegal, Graubard, Williamson & Gail, 2005; Orpana et al., 2009). For older adults (>69 years of age), higher BMI is a protective rather than a risk factor for mortality (Flegal et al., 2005; Tamakoshi et al., 2009) • The diseases and conditions more highly correlated with higher weight occur across the weight spectrum and are known to vary with many confounding factors, such as: socioeconomic status (SES) (Ernsberger, 2009); weight cycling (Kruger, Galuska, Serdula & Jones, 2004); stigma (Puhl & Heuer, 2009); disparities in access to medical care (Amy, Aalborg, Lyons & Keranen, 2006); and physical activity (Williamson et al., 1993) • Most healthcare providers, including (especially!) clinicians who work with fat patients, are weight biased and feel frustrated by interactions with fat patients (Puhl & Heuer, 2009) • Most fat people do not have eating disorders (ED) (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope & Kessler, 2007) • Most fat people do not have psychiatric problems (Friedman & Brownell, 2002; Marcus & Wildes, 2009; Simon et al., 2006). A substantial proportion of fat people, especially women, do not have and never go on to develop diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or heart disease (Sims, 2001; Wildman et al., 2008) • When fat people make sustainable changes in their health practices, they reduce or eliminate the risk factors and health conditions associated with high BMI even when their weights do not change (Bacon, Van Loan, Stern, & Keim, 2005). Weights have indeed risen in the past generation, by about 10e15 pounds on average (Flegal et al., 2005). The group of the very heaviest people (BMI>40; as an illustration, a 50 400 woman who weighs 234 pounds), although few in number, is now double the size it was in 1988 (5.9 vs. 2.9% of the adult population) according to the Centers for Disease Control


20


(2008). The percentiles established in the 1970s for children’s weights, when the 95th percentile represented the heaviest 5%, have been continued in use even though now there is 14e19% (depending on the age group) in the “95th percentile” (Centers for Disease Control, 2010). Since 2004e2005, the weight gains seem to be leveling off (Centers for Disease Control, 2008) and we have no evidence for interventions that make lasting weight changes; still, proposals and policies for the “War on Obesity” continue to proliferate. The conflating of “normal” BMI with health leads to statements like, “If all U.S. adults became nonsmokers of normal weight by 2020, we forecast that the life expectancy of an 18-year-old would increase by 3.76 life-years or 5.16 quality-adjusted years” (Stewart, Cutler & Rosen, 2009). But there is no evidence that: (1) people who have reduced their weight have the same health risks as those who were never heavier; (2) the higher health risks for higherBMI people are caused by higher weight rather than the confounding variables; and (3) there is a way for fat people to become and remain “normal weight.” It is similar to telling poor people that they really should consider making a US$1 million, because millionaires have better health profiles and live longer. The neutral facts about weight changes in our population are not met with scientific curiosity. Instead, they are assumed to herald a growing (and impending) disaster for health, the economy (Finkelstein, Trogdon, Cohen & Dietz, 2009), even the global climate (Edwards & Roberts, 2009). Perhaps, like our ED patients, most people in our culture turn to trying to control weight when faced with dread and anxiety about forces that seem outside our control.

ABOUT THE DATA One thread of my conversation with this patient concerns the nature of evidence. How do we know what (we think) we know about weight? And, what motivates us to maintain these beliefs? Starting from scratch, we have just the fact of a person’s weight, but not an assumption about it. Body size has acquired different meanings in different cultures, and at different times in history. At one point in time, fatness implied wealth; in our time, it implies being lower class (Ernsberger, 2009; Klein, 2001). These meanings are specific to time and place; they have no intrinsic relationship to fatness itself. Examining my own beliefs and the evidence that shapes my thinking about weight, I have found several major sources. One is my personal experience growing up as a “90th percentile” child in height and weight. I know what it felt like to be weighed in front of the other kids, how I compared myself to the more delicately-built girls, and how it felt to have my parents fret about my weight. I also experienced the anguish of people in my family who had ED, with deeply held beliefs about weight. I was in the minority in rejecting the process of dieting at 19, though the other members of my family came to embrace a focus on health practices rather than weight in the decades that followed. A second major source of evidence has been my clinical experience. The fact that I work with people with ED across the weight spectrum, as well as with people of all weights who are thriving and happy, has allowed me to test the hypothesis that fat is a proxy for ill health, depression, and overeating. I am privileged to see a greater range of health, moods, eating styles, and weights, than the vast majority of people do, and to get to know these people intimately. The


THE VALUE OF A WEIGHT NEUTRAL STANCE: PART 1

21

truth is, people who binge come in all sizes. People who restrict come in all sizes. People who purge come in all sizes. Despite my decades of experience, I really cannot look at someone and know what they are going to tell me about what they are doing with food and exercise. Moreover, as an ED specialist, I have been trained to challenge the beliefs of thin people who overvalue thinness and dread fatness. I have seen my patients’ lives resume a normal developmental course when they can allow themselves to eat enough and let their bodies’ genetic inheritance determine their “healthy” weight. I have seen that their weight-based beliefs were part of the problem, an uncontroversial and empirically supported aspect of ED treatment (Wilson & Fairburn, 1993). Oddly enough, the very same beliefs about weight are somehow not seen as part of the problem if the patient is fat. In fact, some suggest that if fat people do not see themselves as sufficiently pathological, professionals should “educate” them to abhor being fat and to engage in the same weight loss attempts as the culturally dominant (white, professional) group (Bryner, 2009). Anyone who has worked with upper-middle class white women knows that this is not the group to use as role models for positive body image. Finally, the third source of evidence is the vast number of studies from the ED, “obesity,” and health fields that contribute to our understanding of weight dynamics, eating practices, and health. In my reading of this literature over 30 years, I have tried to capture and utilize the evidence that is solid, and maintain an agnostic stance toward the research that is too biased or too incomplete to provide answers.

THE VALUE OF A WEIGHT NEUTRAL STANCE: PART 1 Making the transition to a weight neutral world view is a daunting task. Such a perspective is a decidedly minority position, in opposition to broadly held cultural assumptions, and will most likely be under assault for years to come. Why even try to swim upstream against the cultural current? The answer is that, over and over again, we have seen that members of oppressed groups make social progress and improve their mental and physical health by rejecting the negative and stigmatizing messages, paying attention to the truth of their own experience, comparing notes with other members of their group, and identifying the stereotypes, stigma, violence, and discrimination they face. Discrimination based on weight is as common as discrimination based on race and age, and more prevalent than that based on sexual identity, disabilities, and religious beliefs (Latner, O’Brien, Durso, Brinkman & MacDonald, 2008; Puhl, Andreyeva & Brownell, 2008). The correlation between higher weight and a lower SES seems to be causal in both directions (Ernsberger, 2009) in that poverty tends to restrict opportunities for safe physical activity and access to good nutrition, and discrimination against fat people in hiring and retention lowers their income. Public health interventions must address social justice issues like inequality, discrimination, and poverty, not just focus on individual choices. For people to do the hard work of caring for themselves, defending themselves, or loving and advocating for themselves, they have to believe they are worth caring for. Caring for our bodies is hard work, and some environments make it especially difficult. The first order of business is to understand that all bodies, of all sizes and all socio-economic classes, are precious and deserve care.


22


Historically we have witnessed oppressed groups move through a process where they transform shame into pride, and society’s view changes from devaluing them to seeing the value of human diversity. Body size is a biological trait bound to vary widely in a population with a diverse ancestry. It is not due to any kind of pathology, but stems from having evolved from ancestors who survived by adapting to many different environments. Rather than understanding the global nature of our population, we still have a village-scale view of the issue of body size, where one group decides what is “normal” for “us,” and the rest of the people (“they”) are sick/wrong simply because they are fatter. But what if we humans did not have some people who are gifted at making fat from food? Are we so advanced that we can confidently predict that we will never need such a capacity for humans to survive in the future? Is such a capacity better labeled a pathology, to be dispensed with through “treatment,” through surgery or medications or genetic manipulations, in order to satisfy the temporary esthetic ideals of the twenty-first century Western world? Would it not be better to preserve our capacities but continue to find ways of treating diseases? We know that stigma itself causes ill health (Puhl & Latner, 2007), and that many of the heaviest people have weight cycled the most (Weiss, Galuska, Khan & Serdula, 2006). They are also poorer than thinner people (Ernsberger, 2009). But studies do not always control for SES, and none has controlled for weight cycling or stigma. Thus, we do not ever know when a health finding correlated to BMI is really caused by the numerous variables that co-vary with BMI. If, for example, weight cycling causes hypertension, and we conclude that because higher BMI is a risk factor for hypertension we should prescribe weight loss, and prescribing weight loss is, in essence, prescribing weight cycling, we are going to make people sicker and fatter with our “treatment.” In the realm of “obesity” treatment, the solution to being stigmatized is seen as weight loss: remove the person from the stigmatized group, and the assumption is that there is no longer a problem. But we do not understand the identification process with our bodies very well if we imagine that weight loss “removes” the “fat self” or the memories and expectations of being treated as fat. In fact, we should know from treating thin people with ED that a person may never have been fat at all to have a very strong identification with a “fat self” that is despised, feared, and rebelliously embraced by turns.

Cultural Meanings of Fat and Thin Our culture associates fat with certain feeling states, causing us to act out complicated interactions with our bodies that really represent conversations and struggles we are having with disowned parts of ourselves. Table 2.1 illustrates how our “fat” can denote literal evidence of vulnerable and shameful feeling states. Thin people are seen as free from these burdens, and more protected from being exposed, but the public relentlessly projects these stereotypes onto fat people. Whether they happen to feel depressed today or not, fat people do have a very real challenge, day in and day out, navigating these endless projections, assumptions, stereotypes, and objectifications based on body size. Because we all learn to associate certain emotional states with fat, fatness is “read” as tangible evidence of these vulnerable feelings. It is seen as shameful, and while such feelings are part of the human repertoire and thus experienced by all, it is the fat



TABLE 2.1

23

Associations to Thin and Fat

Thin

Fat

Successful

Loser

Confident

Insecure

In control

Out of control

Attractive

Ugly

Well-groomed

Blob

Graceful

Awkward

Conceited

Grateful for attention

Happy

Depressed, angry

Athletic

Couch potato

No eating problems

Overeater

Healthy

Impending illness, doom

Follows medical advice

Non-compliant

Good citizen

Scapegoat

Male

Female

people in our culture who bear the brunt of our projections. It is as if their innermost vulnerable feelings are being worn on the outside. ED therapists know that thin people are every bit as likely to suffer from the internal experience of vulnerability; yet their social experience is different since they are more likely to live in fear, rather than in reality, that this vulnerability will be exposed. This fear leads to anxiety about eating in a way that someone else may view as out of control, being perceived as fat. Looking in the mirror, they recognize their flawed internal selves in the image before them. And so, to be fat is to deal with people’s projections that you are a loser, whether you feel like one or not; and, to be thin is to live in fear of exposure of your inner loser-ness. Clearly, changing one’s body size provides no solution to the existential question of how to claim one’s imperfection as a human being. Part of my job is to see my fat patient without the assumptions. I need to learn from her who she is. I have seen that fat people have little in common with each other, with the exception that the majority of them have had these experiences of being stereotyped and projected upon. When meeting a new client, I try to understand how this unique person has met and managed this common experience.

THE VALUE OF A WEIGHT NEUTRAL STANCE: PART 2 Overhearing clinicians’ stereotypical discussions about fat clients, I wonder why they so easily jettison the skills they use on the problems of people who are not fat. For the fat client,


24


they seem to zero in on the “weight issue” and assume that the treatment plan must have weight loss as its central goal. Complaints that the clinician would interpret as depression or exposure to trauma are here deemed an expectable and predictable consequence of being fat, and the solution is weight loss. But what would we offer a thin person who is depressed or traumatized, who has been stereotyped, or who wants to lose weight as a fantasized solution to all problems? The treatment plan should not depend on the patient’s body size. But what about the fact that weight loss is not a fantasized solution to the problem of being fat? Isn’t losing weight if you are fat a real solution? What does weight loss solve and what does it not solve?

Makeover Mind Makeovers are today’s version of fairy tales, with abundant before and after stories of weight loss, plastic surgery, lottery winners, and house remodels. In these narratives, all problems disappear with a makeover; indeed, they are almost always accompanied by the statement, “I am a whole new person!” The magical thinking of the makeover allows us to imagine that we are now going to live happily ever after. But in real life, there is an after before-and-after. After-the-“after” is when the reality sets in about what the makeover changes and what it does not change. When it comes to weight loss, the “after” is almost always the period of regaining weight, when people feel ashamed and like failures, avoiding people who have seen their weight loss. Weight rebound is the usual course of events, to some degree even with bariatric surgery (Sjostrom et al., 2007). This is true even among members of the Weight Control Registry, a group of several thousand people who are deemed to have “maintained weight loss” (McGuire, Wing, Klem, Lang & Hill, 1999). This fact does not seem to lessen the individual person’s sense of personal inadequacy in not being able to maintain the weight loss. Regaining weight also reinforces the sense that, at one’s core, the true self is the “loser” self, and everything associated with being fat (feeling vulnerable, inadequate, out of control, unable to make an impact, immobilized, and a binger) is reinforced rather than held compassionately as just one aspect of a person’s personality. One of the most important reasons for healthcare professionals to take a weight neutral stance is quite simply this: we do not have an intervention to permanently and safely change weight, at least not for the great majority of people (Mann et al., 2007). To prescribe weight loss is to in fact impose weight cycling on the patient, which can lead to poorer physical and emotional health itself (Blair, Shaten, Brownell, Collins & Lissner, 1993). The continued prescription of weight loss in the face of its continual failure is one of the most data-resistant features of healthcare. But a second major reason for a weight neutral stance is the same reason we investigate the fantasized meanings of weight loss for our thin patients. Holding one’s life hostage to the pursuit of weight loss is one way that many people get stuck developmentally. Disordered eating is almost always intimately bound to the goal of being a certain weight. Restrictingpatients forced to eat more in treatment may start purging to keep from gaining weight, or their bodies may eventually compel them to binge in order to restore weight. Patients who are bulimic and trying not to purge in treatment may start restricting out of the terror of gaining weight. People who are binging without purging may restrict or excessively exercise in the name of dieting. Some may, with their healthcare provider’s blessing, “try to get healthy,”



25

particularly if they are at a higher weight. Many people who are now fat have cycled their weights ever higher with each weight loss attempt, and the legacy of the restrictive phases (like that of all people who diet) is that they have lost touch with their body cues and eat in a highly psychologically reactive manner, where external cues like the presence of food or the opportunity to eat trigger eating whether one is hungry or full (Polivy, Herman & McFarlane, 1994). If we had a culture where weight did not carry much meaning, what would provoke disordered eating? Perhaps we would still have the motive to soothe ourselves with food, but, if we were in touch with our bodies’ needs, our physical experience of comfortable fullness would direct our eating, and the marketing and merchandising of food would have less influence. I attempt to make the therapeutic setting a weight neutral oasis, a subculture where weight has little inherent meaning, so that patients can sort out what truly troubles them and find effective solutions. As people work through the loss of the fantasy of being thin, they examine the question: what does weight loss change and what does it not change? Theoretically, it should change the way someone is treated in a culture that discriminates on body size. But most people, when they regain weight, return to their former status and are faced with the original quandary of how to manage the social oppression. Even the minority of people who maintain weight loss, including those who have had bariatric surgery, usually remain in the “obese” BMI category (Bond, Phelan, Leahey, Hill & Wing, 2009) and, presumably, are still vulnerable to discrimination. We cannot improve health and prevent ED unless we make a culture that celebrates a diversity of body sizes. Within the person’s own internal world, the part of them that identifies as fat is still there, no matter what his or her body size, since the associated feeling states are not really about fat at all, but rather the human and existential feelings of vulnerability. Losing weight does not make you into a different person, one you can now like. It does not keep bad things from happening. It does not keep you from getting sick. It does not keep others from rejecting you or being mean. Many people have described to me the ambivalent feelings they have when they are complimented on weight loss. “I always think, what did you think of me before, if you are making this fuss now? And what will you think if I gain it back?” Our thin ED patients have taught us that you do not need to be fat to be haunted by the dread of being socially humiliated and rejected for being too fat. This quandary is never solved by being “thin enough.” There is an entirely different solutiondin which one’s sense of self-trust and self-efficacy is sturdy enough to be an answer to the anxieties that we all have, no matter what our body size. In the HAES approach, the therapist compassionately explores and challenges the person’s fantasy of weight loss. For patients who are entering treatment with a weight loss goal, this sort of exploration usually requires a solid therapeutic alliance, since it will challenge the wish that is partly responsible for their seeking therapy in the first place. It also will challenge the patient who is aware that many other therapists and healthcare providers will promise weight loss, a perhaps more palatable option. Perhaps it is a matter of self-selection and informed consent, but by the time someone is entering therapy with me, they usually have some sense of the disconnect between the fantasy of weight loss and their lived experience, and are in part seeking help in becoming


26


more weight neutral themselves. The loss of the fantasy of being thin is a requirement for healing the adversarial relationship with one’s body. It is filled with grief as well as unexpected gifts. Over time, progress is increasingly measured by movement towards a sense of being at peace within their own skin and in partnership with their imperfect but precious bodies. These goals gradually become more meaningful and more sustainable than weight loss. When we are able to see what the patient associates with fatness and thinness, we begin to see the feelings states and parts of self that all need a home. The emerging view can often be a difficult experience. The shift from disowning to integrating these states gives a person some confidence that they can endure and care for themselves. When they experience themselves making a place for the disowned parts, they can believe that they can be loved fully by others as well. It is partly the experience of caring for these disowned parts of self that changes a person’s actual experience and view of the universe in which they livedbecause most of our experiences are internal. When you take better care of yourself, there is a sense of “somebody here” to take care of you, demonstrated in the caring acts of feeding, reacting, advocating, etc. The whole universe seems filled with more parental love and respect.

THE VALUE OF A WEIGHT NEUTRAL STANCE: PART 3 Weight neutrality may actually be a necessary condition to enable people to develop sustainable health practices. We know that improved nutritional quality and more frequent physical activity lead to better health, whether weight is lost or not (Bacon et al., 2005; Sacks et al., 2001). But most people who start those practices with a goal of weight loss do not continue them. One hypothesis is that, because these changes are so difficult to make, the additional agenda of trying to do them in order to lose weight tends to be a trigger to start them but not to sustain them. If the purpose of these practices is weight loss alone, people give up their efforts to eat better and move more, as weight loss usually stalls or reverses at multiple points. While this area deserves far more research, Bacon et al.’s study (2005), comparing a HAES model with a traditional weight loss intervention, is instructive. After 2 years, the HAES group was still practicing the health behaviors and had sustained the health benefits, even though their weight had not changed. Meanwhile, the weight loss group had lost, then regained weight, and, no longer practicing the healthier behaviors, had lost the health benefits. We need to better understand the reasons for these motivational differences. People may need to find intrinsic motivators in order to maintain the practices; they may be demoralized by the added drama of the weight loss and gain; they may oscillate between identifications with their “good” (compliant) selves and their “bad” (rebellious) ones. It may take all of their available cognitive, logistical, and attentional resources to develop the capacity to come back to the health practices when inevitably forced out of their healthy routines by the vicissitudes of life. In any case, the more complicated the agenda becomes for a goal, the more that can go wrong. The goal to simply explore foods and physical activities that make you feel better, for the rest of your life, is as simple and direct as possible. We need a research agenda that includes the issues of motivation and sustainable behavioral goals to guide health care practice.



27

Weight Neutrality and Intuitive Eating Many HAES clinicians use intuitive eating (Matz & Frankel, 2007; Tribole & Resch, 2003) as their primary skill-based eating intervention. As is clear to caregivers, infants are born with the ability to act upon hunger and satiety. The fact that many adults fail to use those cues does not mean they are not there. In fact, learning to diet can be seen as a tutorial in how to ignore physical hunger and satiety cues and instead eat according to external stimulidexactly the opposite legacy we would wish, especially in today’s environment that clamors with food marketing (Wansink, 2007). The goal of intuitive eating is to return to a habit of using one’s own body cues for decisionmaking about food, and to also increase the mindful awareness of the results of those decisions. Most people who consider themselves “compulsive eaters” believe they should be more abstinent and restrained because they have “over-indulged.” In actuality, someone whose only pleasure or comfort comes from food is deprived of the full range of life’s treats. In the context of HAES, we aim to increase the pleasure from food, to increase the number of sources of pleasure and satisfaction in the person’s life, and to remove the moral associations of being “good” or “bad” from eating behavior. The rule-making of most diets is avoided, replaced with the simple goal of doing one’s best to take care of oneself at the time. With absent deadlines, external “experts,” and “allowed” or “forbidden” foods, the client begins the simple experiment of asking, “What am I hungry for?” and trying different ways of responding. Some clinicians using intuitive eating do not particularly frame their approach as HAES, and promise weight loss as an outcome. They assume that, if someone has been eating more than their body cues demand, they are bound to lose weight. Little research supports this point, and, for all the reasons we have discussed above, it is critical to maintain an agnostic stance toward weight loss. I tell patients that I cannot predict what will happen as we treat their ED. Some people come to me at the bottom of the weight loss cycle (a “weight low-yo”) and will gain weight when they practice intuitive eating, simply because their bodies are restoring their weight. Others lose weight if their bodies have been receiving food for all kinds of needs that were not just for food. Many simply stabilize in weight. The important psychological stance is to put the practices of self-care first. Weight is the dependent variable. This proposal scares many people, who focus on weight as the “bottom line,” ignoring the process. A central pathology in ED thinking is that what you weigh is more important than how you live your life. The agenda for therapy is to address dread, build skills, facilitate self-care, and engender hope and a sense of competence. These same tasks apply across the weight spectrum. Thus, as with any patient struggling with an ED, the focus is on getting the fuel one’s body needs, holding an agnostic position about any weight outcome, and helping patients with their considerable anxiety about giving up the illusion of being able to both feed themselves well and choose their weight at the same time.

From Makeover Mind to Sustainable Eating In keeping with the emphasis on “leaving behind Makeover Mind,” my version of teaching intuitive eating skills emphasizes “sustainable eating.” The question becomes: what works for you over time? If you have a regime that you can’t keep doing through the ups and downs of your life, then it will lead to weight cycling.


28


One can begin to identify the important functions of food by building a matrixdfor example, food as fuel (one axis) and a source of pleasure (the other axis), as seen in Figure 2.1. Using this matrix, therapist and patient can assess and explore the different experiences of fooddthe immediate taste experience as well as the functional benefits that food confers in the following hours or days. Armed with a sense of their body’s moderating influence, and its reliability compared to the swinging extremes of psychological and cognitive processes, much of the anxiety about the “permissiveness” of intuitive eating gradually resolves. Sometimes it is downright disappointing how little food one’s body wants, and how dependent we are on our bodies to get hungry again in order to experience that degree of pleasure in eating. In this stage of treatment, we begin to distinguish the great variety of sources for the desire to eat, and how many of them are not due to hunger. From the therapist’s viewpoint, this information determines the next phase of the treatment plan. Some people learn the intuitive eating skills and take off with them, never to return to restricting or binging. Their difficulties seem to truly stem from losing track of those internal cues, most often from developing a dieting mindset. Other people may have all sorts of triggers for eating (or not eating), which take a long time to sort out and address. Among these are: regulating mood or emotions with food or hunger; physiological causes for binging, such as being below one’s genetic weight range (Keys, 1953) even at a high BMI, or getting caught in vicious cycles of blood sugar dysregulation; more entrenched “dieting detox” reactions, encountering opportunities to eat formerly forbidden food, or reacting rebelliously to the perception that they should be

FIGURE 2.1 Sustainable

Eating Chart.



29

dieting; and body image enactments, in which specific body sizes hold meaning for the person and any changes in weight (the “dependent variable”) as a result of the process of intuitive eating can be problematic. Everyone also faces the daunting demands of breaking old habits, and needing to give energy and awareness to the tasks of developing new systems for self-care and solving everyday logistical problems. We still have much to understand about the biological basis for ED. Clearly, our cultural associations with thinness and fatness often trigger dieting practices that can launch vicious cycles of distressing neurological, physiological, and emotional patterns. Treatment must help patients strip away the weight-related associations with foods and ways of eating so they may respond to their hungers in a straightforward, less driven, and more conscious manner.

Other Self-Care Behaviors The HAES model does not focus solely on eating practices, examining other behaviors that can increase the experience of well-being, such as physical activity, obtaining restful sleep, and above all, strengthening social support. The weight neutrality of the HAES approach is central to the process of integrating pleasurable physical activity into one’s life. In both eating and exercise, basic human activities have been polarized into “good” (weight-reducing) and “bad” (weight-producing). Likewise, the foods eaten, or the exercise performed or avoided, trigger identification with the “good” and “bad” selves. As long as these selves are compartmentalized, patients may be caught up in rapid and disruptive shifts between overeating and compensation. My clients usually have a mixed perception of exercise, depending on whether they remember it as recess or PE, recreation, or a weight control activity. Despite significant individual differences in how pleasurable movement is, most of my clients have at least some positive memories of playful activity. But for people who were not immediately gifted, or whose bodies were not seen as athletic, memories of movement may be quite painful. For anyone who has tried to exercise to lose weight, the association is usually more punitive than pleasurable. And so, as with eating, the legacy of pursuing weight loss is a barrier to the long-term integration of the very practices that will matter for well-being and health. Great Shape (Lyons & Burgard, 1988) examines the special issues that heavier people experience when exploring and integrating sustainable physical activity. For people of any size, the process of finding pleasurable movement can be the same as that of intuitive eating: becoming more aware of the hunger to move, and exploring the kinds of movement that satisfy and when. However, finding arenas for movement that do not further reinforce the association with “weight management” is a challenge in our culture; sadly, the weight loss agenda seems to dominate the experience in most locations. Assessing the quality of sleep is a surprisingly overlooked aspect of healthcare, and sleep medicine is a relatively new field (Dement & Vaughan, 2000). Here, too, weight bias affects access to care, especially with diagnoses such as sleep apnea, which are present in people of all sizes but stereotypically associated with fatness. My thinner patients have had difficulty obtaining referrals to get a sleep study; and, oddly enough, after diagnosis of her sleep apnea, one patient with anorexia nervosa (AN) got a letter suggesting that she “consider weight


30


loss.” Both patients and doctors have presumed that sleep apnea resolves after bariatric surgery and do not even test for it at regular intervals, leaving many post-surgery patients with untreated apnea that has returned or never resolved (Hallowell et al., 2007; Lettieri, Elliasson & Greenburg, 2008). Finally, the HAES model attends to social support as a key element of mental and physical well-being. Patients need strong and loving connections with others and freedom from stigma and violence. One way to bring this about is to connect patients to supportive communitiesdonline, in their area, or in a support group. Because one source of distress is the weight bias in our culture, finding a new social niche, a healthier subculture, can nurture and strengthen weight diversity and minimize body disparagement.

THE VALUE OF A WEIGHT NEUTRAL STANCE: PART 4 The HAES model draws upon the general research on health and well-being to identify its important aspects: pleasurable physical activity, restful sleep, social support, safety, and freedom from stigma. Note that different mixtures of individual motivation and the broader environment are critical to each of these elements. The HAES model not only focuses on an individual’s choices, but also on changing our cultural, social, and ecological environments to support well-being. Because one of the central vehicles for the oppression of fat people is the contention that they cannot be healthy, HAES advocates argue that healthcare providers must recognize their role in designing and carrying out programs, albeit with the best of intentions, which are actually making people sicker (Isono, Watkins & Lian, 2009). The Academy for Eating Disorders initiated a statement in December 2009 along with all the other major eating disorders organizations, calling for a change in focus from weight-based programs to health, as stated by AED President Susan Paxton, PhD, FAED: There is concern that we have lost sight of the importance of avoiding harm in the process of addressing obesity. Further, we cannot ignore the opportunity to create a healthier environment, where people of all sizes are given the opportunity to lead healthy and productive lives, instead of singling out individual groups for reform based on weight alone. (Academy for Eating Disorders, 2009)

Another useful document addressing these issues is the Academy for Eating Disorder’s Guidelines for Childhood Obesity Prevention Programs (Danielsdottir, Burgard & Oliver-Pyatt, 2009). The guidelines argue for health-based, rather than weight-based, interventions that focus on the health of all children and measure health outcomes rather than weight per se. They urge program developers to reduce stigma, teasing, and bullying, and to focus on reducing environmental barriers that prevent people from having access to nutritious foods and pleasurable and safe physical activity. Individual healthcare practice, public health programs, workplace programs, and even diagnostic criteria, could all become more weight neutral. Current definitions of ED sometimes incorporate weight references or frank criteria that lead to harm. For example, a strict reading of the DSM-IV-R (American Psychiatric Assocation, 1994) dictates refraining from giving an AN diagnosis unless the patient is 15% below “minimally normal body


INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION, EATING DISORDERS, AND HEALTH

31

weight.” Despite some room for individual determination, most clinicians are forced to wait to give the diagnosis until the patient is well-entrenched in the disease. I have seen fat patients who really should be given an AN diagnosis, as they restrict, are intensely afraid of gaining weight, are rigidly focused on food and exercise, and may even have lost their periods. If we imagine the pathological process of AN as the problem, and the weight loss as the result, it makes little sense to have to wait until the disease is at a critical, life-threatening stage to name it a problem. If you are in a plane that loses an engine at 40,000 feet, you wouldn’t want to have to wait to take action until you were at 10,000 feet. These examples suggest that we need to address broader forces in order to improve public health. Many HAES practitioners are activists systemically challenging the policies and social norms that harm people across the weight spectrum. But while we are trying to change the culture we also have much to offer our individual clients.

STEREOTYPE MANAGEMENT SKILLS For many clients, the acknowledgement that their health is linked to factors beyond their personal control is a new perspective. Many people have been focusing on specific food or exercise regimens to manage their less-conscious worries about mortality, and so many of them blame themselves for any physical or medical difficulty. Acknowledging that they are subject to stereotyping and stigma is oddly taboo. Perhaps it is part of the human condition to prefer to believe that aversive conditions are our own fault, rather than acknowledging that sometimes we cannot control broad, external forces that hurt us. I have found that giving patients tools to manage these broader forces generally feels empowering. In Box 2.2 is a summary of some of these tools.

INTERNALIZED OPPRESSION, EATING DISORDERS, AND HEALTH Perhaps it is ironic that a “weight neutral” approach attends to the effects of being stereotyped according to body size. But research is beginning to show the importance of our beliefs about weight and self-worth and their impact on our health. Muennig, Jia, Lee & Lubetkin (2008) showed that the difference between actual and desired body weight was a stronger predictor of mental and physical health than was BMI. Puhl, Moss-Racusin & Schwartz (2007) noted that: “[Weight loss] participants who believed that weight-based stereotypes were true reported more frequent binge eating” and that such findings “challenge the notion that stigma may motivate obese individuals to engage in efforts to lose weight” (p. 1). In a well-designed prospective study of teens, Neumark-Sztainer et al. (2006) found that trying to lose weight resulted in both higher weight and greater likelihood of disordered eating. Mond et al. (2007) report that: “weight and shape concerns” were the mediating variable between obesity and psychosocial impairment and that “a greater focus on body acceptance in obesity treatment may be indicated” (p. 2769). In a more positive vein, Avalos & Tylka (2006) showed that “women who accept their bodies the way they are seem to be more likely to follow principles of healthy eating” (p. 486).


32


BOX 2.2

STEREOTYPE MANAGEMENT SKILLS

Know yourself:

Cultivate compassion:

• Cultivate self knowledge that challenges the stereotype • Invest in your own agenda, as an antidote to being swayed to either act like or act unlike the stereotype • Foster your drive to be seen as your real self. Remember, especially with negative projections: “if they knew me they would probably like me!”.

• Be kind to yourself when you are hurt and when you are struggling. Stereotyping hurts no matter how strong your defenses are • Remember we all are prone to stereotyping. Try to stay in touch with your belief in the humanity of the person stereotyping. It will make it more possible for them to snap out of it if you don’t respond by stereotyping them back • Heal with infusions of playfulness, righteous anger, passion, and humility.

Prepare yourself: • Expect stereotyping will happen, as unpleasant as it isebudget it in • Know the specifics. Understand the typical ways you are likely to be stereotyped, when, where, who. Understand the function of stereotyping in general • Blame the process, not your body. Make sure you do not confuse the projection with your real self. Address internalized projections.

Impact the situation when possible: • Collect proven ways to “show up” through the fog of the stereotype. What have others done? What has worked before? Think playfully • Participate in more personal settings and situations where you can contribute, when you have a choice • Seek out or bring along allies when you can.

Create new culture: • Bond with other people who support your identity • When you are facing stereotyping, think about telling your peeps about what is happening e evoke them and let them be present with you • Be an activist! Do things that make you feel empowered. Take credit for artfully fighting the stereotype • Create new culture with your words, pictures, and deeds.

Study history: • Research resistance to oppression in all its forms • Feel connected to all the humans who came before you and who created a new culture for you. Think about the people who will benefit in the future from your actions now.


AFTER

33

AFTER My fat client is still fat. She has spent time in therapy recognizing her own weight biases and their impact on her self-esteem and her motivation for taking care of the precious, flawed body she has. She has found other women who are trying to challenge the assumption that thinness is always better, and she has realized with a shock of recognition that she began life with the capacity to see beauty and worth in fat people. She is working on self-care, which is an ongoing project. She is surprised that she really doesn’t like the taste of potato chips. She is surprised that she has both chocolate and fresh spinach in her house. She is walking her dog regularly and gearing up to try a belly dance class, maybe when she can find a buddy to go with her. She has told her physician that she knows he has to remind her about her BMI as a matter of procedure, but that, in case he is interested, it makes her feel worse and not really seen or appreciated. They are working on a better model for collaborating on her health. She still has bad days. She still feels like a loser sometimes, but she can also hear the harshness in that appellation, and she is beginning to feel some compassion. She has met some friends who challenge her when she starts bashing her bodydand they help her be curious about what is going on emotionally. Every day she hears another news story about the “obesity epidemic” and forced weighing of children, or employees, or college seniors. Every day she sees another photo of some anonymous fat person whose body is deemed too shameful to show their face. But she is beginning to have a theory about all of this, fueled by insights from her own introspection. She is finally beginning to see the suffering among her thin friends, and is surprised not to envy them as much. She reports to me that one of them can’t stand it that she has cookies in her house that she hasn’t touched since the last time she visited and demands to know, “How are you doing this?” She is bemused. As she takes her eggs out of the “Makeover” basket, she starts distributing them in the “go back to grad school,” “go out on a few dates,” “buy some really comfortable and really wellmade clothes,” “set a limit with my mother about diet talk,” and “write a letter to the airlines” baskets. She is beginning to reliably experience a different way to take care of herself. She is mostly present now, in her body, and in her truth, and in her life. And so we carry on.

References Academy for Eating Disorders (2009). Press Release, December 13. Eating disorder organizations join forces to urge focus on health and lifestyle rather than weight. (http://www.eatingdisordersmaine.com/id62.html); and message posted to [email protected] American Psychiatric Association (1994). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author. Amy, N. K., Aalborg, A., Lyons, P., & Keranen, L. (2006). Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 147e155. Association for Size Diversity and Health (ASDAH), HAES principles. Retrieved 12/16/09 from www. sizediversityandhealth.org Avalos, L. C., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). Exploring a model of intuitive eating with college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 486e497. Bacon, L., Van Loan, M., Stern, J. S., & Keim, N. (2005). Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese female chronic dieters. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 929e936. Bacon, L. (2008). Health at every size: The surprising truth about your weight. Dallas, TX: Benbella.


34


Blair, S., Shaten, J., Brownell, K., Collins, G., & Lissner, L. (1993). Body weight change, all-cause mortality, and causespecific mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, 749e757. Bond, D. S., Phelan, S., Leahey, T. M., Hill, J. O., & Wing, R. R. (2009). Weight-loss maintenance in successful weight losers: Surgical vs. non-surgical methods. International Journal of Obesity, 33(1), 173e180. Bryner, J. (2009). The obese don’t always know it. Retrieved 12/06/09 from http://www.livescience.com/health/ 091117-obesity-body-size-html Burgard, D. (2009). What is health at every size? In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 41e53). New York, NY: NYU Press. Campos, P. (2004). The obesity myth. New York, NY: Gotham Books. Centers for Disease Control (2008). Prevalence of overweight, obesity and extreme obesity among adults: United States, trends 1960e1962 through 2005e2006. Retrieved 12/06/09 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/ overweight/overweight_adult.htm Centers for Disease Control (2010). NHANES Surveys (1976e1980 and 2003e2006). Retrieved from http://www.cdc. gov/obesity/childhood/prevalence.html Danielsdottir, S., Burgard, D., & Oliver-Pyatt, W. (2009). Guidelines for childhood obesity prevention programs. Retrieved 12/13/09 from http://aedweb.org/media/Guidelines.cfm Dement, W. C., & Vaughan, C. (2000). The promise of Sleep. New York, NY: Random House (Dell). Edwards, P., & Roberts, I. (2009). Population adiposity and climate change. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(4), 1137e1140. Ernsberger, P. (2009). Does social class explain the connection between weight and health? In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 25e36). New York, NY: NYU Press. Finkelstein, E. A., Trogdon, J. G., Cohen, J. W., & Dietz, W. (2009). Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: Payer- and service-specific estimates. Health Affairs, 28(5), 822e831. Flegal, K. M., Graubard, B. I., Williamson, D. F., & Gail, M. H. (2005). Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(15), 1861e1867. Friedman, J. M. (2009). Causes and control of excess body fat. Nature, 459(21), 340e342. Friedman, M. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2002). Psychological consequences of obesity. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook (2nd ed.). (pp. 393e398) New York, NY: Guilford Press. Gaesser, G. (2002). Big fat lies: The truth about your weight and your health. Carlsbad, CA: Gurze. Hallowell, P. T., Stellato, T. A., Schuster, M., Graf, K., Robinson, A., Crouse, C., & Jasper, J. J (2007). Potentially life-threatening sleep apnea is unrecognized without aggressive evaluation. The American Journal of Surgery, 193(3), 364e367. Hudson, J., Hiripi, E., Pope, H., & Kessler, R. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry, 61(3), 348e358. Isono, M., Watkins, P. L., & Lian, L. E. (2009). Bon bon fatty girl. In E. Rothblum & S. Solovay (Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 127e138). New York, NY: NYU Press. Keys, A. (1953). The biology of human starvation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Klein, R. (2001). Fat beauty. In J. E. Braziel & K. LeBesco (Eds.), Bodies out of bounds (pp. 19e38). Berkeley, CA: UC Press. Kruger, J., Galuska, D. A., Serdula, M. K., & Jones, D. A. (2004). Attempting to lose weight: Specific practices among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(5), 402e406. Latner, J. D., O’Brien, K. S., Durso, L. E., Brinkman, L. A., & MacDonald, T. (2008). Weighing obesity stigma: The relative strength of different forms of bias. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 1145e1152. Lettieri, C. J., Elliasson, A. H., & Greenburg, D. L. (2008). Persistence of obstructive sleep apnea after surgical weight loss. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 4(4), 333e338. Lyons, P., & Burgard, D. (1988). Great shape. Palo Alto, CA: Bull. Mann, T., Tomiyama, A. J., Wrestling, E., Lew, A., Samuels, B., & Chatman, J. (2007). Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: Diets are not the answer. American Psychologist, 62(3), 220e233. Marcus, M. D., & Wildes, J. E. (2009). Obesity: Is it a mental disorder? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 739e753. Matz, J., & Frankel, E. (2007). Diet survivor’s handbook. Chicago, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc.


AFTER

35

McGuire, M. T., Wing, R. R., Klem, M. L., Lang, W., & Hill, J. O. (1999). What predicts weight regain among a group of successful weight losers? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 177e185. Mond, J. M., Rodgers, B., Hay, P. J., Darby, A., Owen, C., Baune, B. T., & Kennedy, L. (2007). Obesity and impairment in psychosocial functioning in women: The mediating role of eating disorder features. Obesity, 15(211), 2769e2779. Muennig, P., Jia, H., Lee, R., & Lubetkin, E. (2008). I think therefore I am: Perceived ideal weight as a determinant of health. American Journal of Public Health, 98(3), 1e5. Neumark-Sztainer, D., Wall, M., Guo, J., Story, M., Haines, J., & Eisenberg, M. (2006). Obesity, disordered eating, and eating disorders in a longitudinal study of adolescents: How do dieters fare 5 years later? American Dietetic Association, 106, 559e568. Orpana, H. M., Berthelot, J., Kaplan, M., Feeny, D., McFarland, B., & Ross, N. (2009). BMI and mortality: Results from a national longitudinal study of Canadian adults. Obesity (18 June 2009, http://www.nature.com/oby/ journal/v18/n1/abs/oby2009191a.html); doi:10.1038/oby.2009.191 Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & McFarlane, T. (1994). Effects of anxiety on eating: Does palatability moderate distressinduced overeating in dieters? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 505e510. Puhl, R. M., & Latner, J. (2007). Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 557e580. Puhl, R. M., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Schwartz, M. B. (2007). Internalization of weight bias: Implications for binge eating and emotional well-being. Obesity (Silver Spring), 15(1), 19e23. Puhl, R. M., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity (http://www.nature. com/ijo/journal/v32/n6/abs/ijo200822a.html); doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.22 Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity (http://www.nature.com/ oby/journal/v17/n5/full/oby2008636a.html); doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636 Sacks, F. M., Svetkey, L. P., Vollmer, W. M., Appel, L. J., Bray, G. A., Harsha, D., . Lin, P. H. (2001). Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 3e10. Simon, G., Von Korff, M., Saunders, K., Miglioretti, D., Crane, P., Van Belle, G., & Kessler, R. C. (2006). Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the U.S. adult population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 824e830. Sims, E. (2001). Are there persons who are obese, but metabolically healthy? Metabolism, 50(12), 1499e1504. Sjostrom, L., Narbro, K., Sjostrom, C. D., Karason, K., Larsson, B., Wedel, H., . Carlsson, L. M. (2007). Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 741e752. Stewart, S. T., Cutler, D. M., & Rosen, A. B. (2009). Forecasting the effects of obesity and smoking on U.S. life expectancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(23), 2252e2260. Tamakoshi, A., Yatsuya, H., Yingsong, L., Tamakoshi, K., Kondo, T., Suzuki, S., . Kiruchi, S. (2009). BMI and allcause mortality among Japanese older adults: Findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Obesity (http://www.nature.com/oby/journal/v18/n2/full/oby2009190a.html); doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.190 Tribole, E., & Resch, E. (2003). Intuitive eating. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. Wansink, B. (2007). Mindless eating. New York, NY: Random House. Weiss, E. C., Galuska, D. A., Khan, L. K., & Serdula, M. K. (2006). Weight-control practices among U.S. adults, 2001e2002. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(1), 18e24. Wildman, R. P., Muntner, P., Reynolds, K., McGinn, A. P., Rajpathak, S., Wylie-Rosett, J., & Sowers, M. R. (2008). The obese without cardiometabolic risk factor clustering and the normal weight with cardiometabolic risk factor clustering. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(15), 1617e1624. Williamson, D. F., Madans, J., Anda, R. F., Kleinman, J., Kahn, H., & Byers, T. (1993). Recreational physical activity and ten-year weight change in a U.S. national cohort. International Journal of Obesity, 17(5), 279e286. Wilson, G. T., & Fairburn, C. G. (1993). Cognitive treatments for eating disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 261e269.


C H A P T E R

3 Neuroscience Contributions to the Understanding and Treatment of Eating Disorders Francine Lapides With all the money, and all the glamour and all the fame and attention and success, it doesn’t mean anything if you can’t fit into your own clothes. It means the fat won. You didn’t win. Here I am one of the most visible people in the world trying not to be visible, trying not to appear on the cover of my own magazine. I’m mad at myself. I’m embarrassed. I can’t believe I’m still talking about weight (Winfrey, 2008). Oprah Winfrey’s words illustrate how disordered relationships with food and weight can wreak devastating pain on even the strongest, most successful, and most visible. Most eating disorders (ED) have their onset during adolescence and arise from physical, psychological, cultural, and social factors that are dauntingly complex. The media and our thin-obsessed society certainly contribute. Also at play is the abundance of and ease of access to a staggering variety of foods, many of them “fast” and void of nutrition. But the origins of ED are much more intricate. They lie in the elaborate biology and neurobiology of our bodies and in the tender and earliest attachment relationships that shape the very development of our brains and nervous systems. Early histories of those with ED often include trauma, psychic injuries that occurred without secure containment or repair. Clear and impressive evidence supports a correlation between ED and these early attachment difficulties (Armstrong & Roth 1989; O’Kearney 1996). While consensus is that the treatments for ED must be extensive, specialized, and multidisciplinary, we currently know far too little about how to treat them effectively. This chapter translates findings from attachment research and from the field of neuroscience into a conceptual model of ED which emphasizes the unconscious, holistic, right hemisphere (RH), rather than the logical left hemisphere (LH) specifically targeted in approaches that utilize wellaccepted techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). This neurodevelopmental, causal model of ED will draw from a multidisciplinary blending of developmental psychobiology and affective neuroscience to examine the role of the brain as the very “substrate on which eating disorders are built” (Treasure, Tchanturia & Ulrike, 2005, p. 194), and may well improve treatment outcomes as it generates innovative protocols.


37


38

3. NEUROSCIENCE

UNCOVERING THE NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF EATING DISORDERS The regulation of appetite and eating involves both peripheral (bodyebrain connections) and central (within the brain itself) pathways. Many neural center and biochemical irregularities are considered causal in the origins of ED. For example, altered brain metabolism in the locus coeruleus, a concentrated mass of norepinephrine-secreting neurons, may leave individuals vulnerable to surges of adrenaline and noradrenaline which in turn create a continual state of anxiety, arousal, and alarm (O’Donnell, Hegadoren & Coupland, 2004). Altered insula response to taste stimuli provides evidence that those with anorexia nervosa (AN) experience taste differently than a control group and that the insula and orbital frontal cortex (OFC) alter eating behavior by encoding changes in the value of food used as a reward (Wagner et al., 2008). Body image disturbances in those with AN may stem from underlying problems with right parietal lobe functioning (Grunwald, Etrrich, Assmann, Daehne & Krause, 2001; Ramachandran & Blakeslee, 1998). Reduced right dorsal ACC volume is observed in AN, and likely relates to deficits in perceptual organization and conceptual reasoning, (McCormick et al., 2008).1 Hypofunctioning dorsal striatum have been implicated in obesity (Stice, Spoor, Bohon & Small, 2008). In addition, the smaller size of the thalamus and thalamic perfusion changes in AN suggest that the thalamus plays an important role in mediating ED (Dusoir et al., 2005). Finally, OFC malfunctioning and the subsequent increases in impulsivity are a risk factor for ED (Wonderlich, Connolly & Stice, 2004), and changes in the reward circuitry (ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex) have been found in those diagnosed with ED (Bergen et al., 2005). In spite of impressive growth in the research on ED, little relates to the most commonly diagnosed type, Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS), which accounts for the majority of ED patients seen in the community (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 1996). This review also demonstrates the lack of a unifying theory to make sense of the specific neural correlates at play in both the origin and treatment of ED.

A UNIFYING THEORY: EATING DISORDERS AND THE NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF AFFECT-REGULATION CAPACITIES Affect-regulation refers to the way our nervous system manages the arousal in response to stress, or more simply, the way we manage energy. Brain researchers have examined why humans are so prone to dysregulated states, as in the chronic anxiety, anger, and depression An aside on Language: For the practicing clinician the foreign-sounding, multi-syllabic complex terminology of neuroscience and neuropsychology pose a barrier to understanding. These language barriers arise principally from the need for technical terms in order to precisely describe complex anatomical and functional neural systems. While the use of technical terms renders this field less accessible, and though it is beyond the scope of this chapter to define every term used, I have included them nevertheless, as they appear in the literature, along with occasional brief explanations, and a list of references for those wishing to gain a more fluid working vocabulary. 1


A UNIFYING THEORY: EATING DISORDERS

39

that often accompany and underlie unhealthy relationships to food (Fernandez-Aranda et al., 2007; Keel, Klump, Miller, McGue & Iacono, 2005). Through the lens of affect-regulation theory, ED can be thought of as strategies to manage excess and disruptive arousal. Eating disorders are one of a subset of externalizing disorders, with a primary etiology being the failure of early attachment relationships to teach sufficient self-regulation and co-regulation capabilities. In the absence of a more direct or effective way to modulate arousal, those with ED rely on external regulators related to the seeking or avoidance of food. Some turn toward food as a source of comfort; others overeat in a futile attempt to “get enough” of what food can offer only fleetingly; while others turn just as obsessively away from food as the enemy. Thus, attempts to self-regulate externally can take the form of compulsive overeating, bulimic binging/purging to create a dissociative “numbing” state, anorexic avoidance of food, or a combination of all three.

Neural Pathways for Affect-Regulation One of the basic psychobiological requirements of survival is the regulation of energy. Infants are born with a great deal of affect and little capacity to regulate their own rapid shifts between high and low arousal states. An infant’s self-regulating capabilities are limited to sucking, gaze aversion, and dissociation (an unconscious, neurologically mediated way of shutting down when an experience is too powerful or otherwise unbearable). They learn everything else about effectively self-soothing or modulating affect from the adults who comfort and nurture them. In other words, attachment relationships are critical because they facilitate the development of the brain’s self-regulatory mechanisms (Fonagy, Gergely, Jurist & Target, 2002). Thus, attachment and self-regulation go hand-in-hand. Parents who are regulated themselves can be responsively attuned, moving toward the child to attend to them, or picking up the infant to stroke, rock, or walk the child, while cooing soothing sounds or singing lullabies. These are all right hemisphere (RH) nonverbal communications; a child has no left hemisphere (LH) verbal processing until the age of two. By introjecting these soothing moments, the infant learns to internally self-soothe. For insecurely attached children, whose bodies are left unregulated too often and for too long, affect-regulation is impaired. Subsequent dysregulation can take the form of chronic hyperor hypoactivation and can leave the child predisposed to the eventual onset of psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders (Scaer, 2000; Schore, 1996, 1997). The child may grow to be a teenager who soothes himself or herself externally by using drugs, self-injuring, starving, gorging and then purging, or by eating when distressed. Although our knowledge of functional neuroanatomy is far from complete, the connections between different areas of the cortex, and from the neocortex to lower brain structures, are well understood. Developmental studies elucidate how the brain structures involved in regulating energy are developed, and how they are impacted by our earliest relationships (Schore, 1994).

Neural Developmental Sequence The capacity to regulate affect emerges in the very early months of life. An infant develops the ability to handle stressful changes in the external environment by experiencing the caretaker’s regulation strategies and his or her own subsequent calming down.


40

3. NEUROSCIENCE

The amygdala and insula, both deep in the temporal lobe, begin to develop during the last trimester of pregnancy. Working together, they register all sensory and propioceptive input and can trigger the body into high states of arousal by activating, through the hypothalamus, the pituitary and adrenal glands, and the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which signals danger or distress and can propel the body to fight, flight, or freeze. These surges of energy begin to be internally modulated as the capacity for regulating affect is gradually transferred from the caretaker to the infant’s brain through body to body, skin to skin contact, deep mutual gazing, facial expressivity, and the melodic prosody or “music of the voice” that we call “parentese.” When adults consistently regulate the infant’s shifting levels of arousal, they stimulate the infant’s own regulatory centers to develop optimally. Neurological circuits of emotion regulation, the insula, then the anterior cingulate (AC), at 2 months, and the OFC at 12 months, come online and create cortical and subcortical pathways down into the amygdala. Activation of these pathways calms the child and inhibits the arousal and expression of emotional states (Schore 1994, 1997, 2001a). Extensive reciprocal connections exist between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Davidson, 1998), particularly the medial and orbital zones of the PFC, from which extend neurons of gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA), a valium-like calming substance manufactured by the brain (Amaral, Price, Pitkanen & Carmichael, 1992). If early relationships are insecure, less than optimal connections are made within the OFC and AC and down into the insula and amygdala. The right brain is itself not as integrated; its regulating pathways may be too thin, its connections into the body not as good and greater amounts and higher frequencies of dysregulation will ensue (Schore, 1994, 1996, 2003a). This mis-wiring shows itself symptomatically as anxiety and affective disorders and in disordered relationships to food.

THE BODY AND A BIPHASIC SYSTEM OF AFFECT-REGULATION A child must eventually learn to calm him- or herself when he or she is hyperaroused into excitement, anger, fear, or panic, and to bring themselves up from shame, despair, or boredom. Thus, a primary goal of these earliest attachment relationships is to instill in the infant a biphasic system of affect-regulation. To accomplish this, connections must form between the infant’s own cortical regulating centers, and the rest of the child’s body via the hypothalamic release of body-regulating hormones and through the autonomic nervous system (ANS), whose energizing sympathetic and calming parasympathetic branches move energy up from the body into the brain and back down again. When these neural connections have been wired well, the child can, by 24 months, begin to regulate their entire system when affect threatens to rise too high or fall too low for optimal functioning (Schore, 1994).

Chronic Hyperactivation via the Hypothalamic Pituitary Axis The hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) is a major stress-regulating circuit from the brain into the body linking the hypothalamus, the pituitary, and the adrenal glands. During stress, this circuit triggers the release of corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), the brain’s major stress hormone that, in turn, causes the pituitary gland to release adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and, subsequently, the adrenal glands to release cortisol. Trauma seems


DISSOCIATION AND POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EATING DISORDERS

41

to leave this brain system prone to oversecreting CRF which bathes the brain and body in excess levels of cortisol, resulting in chronic hyperarousal and explaining many of the symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Once this system has been hyperactivated and hypersensitized, an individual’s stress regulation capacities, especially in response to relational injuries, launch more quickly and involve deeper dysregulation (Schore, 2003a, 2001b). Individuals who are poorer at emotional regulation show higher evening levels of cortisol (Davidson, Fox & Kalin, 2007) and an exaggerated startle reflex. Research (Treasure et al., 2005) utilizing the startle reflex as a measure of affective reactivity found that subjects with ED were not soothed by pleasant stimuli (such as pictures of baby animals) although those with bulimia nervosa (BN) were soothed by photographs depicting food. In contrast, when people with any type of ED viewed images of thin models, their defensive response increased. “Thus, salient emotion [sic] cues differentially produce either an exaggerated or attenuated automatic reaction, depending on the form of the eating disorder” (Treasure et al., 2005, p. 195). Other studies have found hyperactive states of emotion, such as anxiety and anger, are particularly important in the triggering of binges and are more likely to precede binging than is depression (Agras & Telch, 1998; Arnow, Kenardy & Agras, 1992; Waller & Barter, 2005).

Chronic Hypoactivation as Dissociation The brain is modular, comprised of well-defined systems, separate in structure and function, which must link up and work together in an integrated way to create our subjective experiences. The more traumatic an experience, the more energy is absorbed into the brain, resulting in a state of neural hyperactivation. The brain protects itself with a kind of circuit breaker system. When energy reaches a critical level, as in overwhelming trauma, neural connections are cut off between the prefrontal cortical and subcortical limbic structures, particularly in the right hemisphere (Schore, 2009), capping and trapping the intense energy beneath a deadened or numbed dissociative state (Porges, 1995). Researchers have recreated this dissociative defense by using scanning technology and scripts of an individual’s experiences, transcribed from their own verbal narratives. A 2007 study (Hopper, Frewen, van der Kolk & Lanius, 2007) observed this neural response to trauma in real time. Hearing their own trauma scripts read back to them, 70% of the subjects went into hyperarousal states, and 30% dissociated. In the latter group, instead of elevating, their heart rates decreased and the cortex became hypometabolic.

DISSOCIATION AND POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EATING DISORDERS In neuroscience, ED is often viewed as a product of affect that is either under- or overregulated. Excessive bodily energy that cannot be regulated down using internal mechanisms can cause a person to reach out to food in order to feel calm. On the other hand, emotions that are overregulated, that are packed down or dissociated, leave the individual without connection to his or her own emotional and physiological states. Left in states of hypoarousal too often or for too long, individuals can lose the ability to sense their own corporeal selves. After


42

3. NEUROSCIENCE

years of this defensive overregulation, strong feelings in the body may be unable to come up the neural chain into consciousness and may instead be regulated by reaching for something external like food (Allan Schore, personal communication, September 27, 2008). Some degree of dissociation underlies most forms of psychopathology, including those related to food. Eating disorders are characterized by both immediate state dissociation and by more chronic trait dissociation (De Berardis et al., 2009; Hallings-Pott, Waller, Watson & Scragg, 2005). For example, in people with AN, emotional blunting and apathy, a secondary effect of starvation, is more tolerable than arousal. “For such individuals, ‘numbing’ is preferable to the overwhelming experience of anger, jealousy, envy or regret” (Treasure et al., 2005, p. 197). There is a clearly and repeatedly established link between dissociation and bulimic behavior (Everill & Waller, 1995; Everill, Waller & Macdonald, 1995; Waller et al., 2003). Dissociation is both acute and chronic among bulimic women (Hallings-Pott et al., 2005), and binge eating and dissociation appear to serve the common function of blocking negative affect by distancing from it emotionally. Dissociative blunting also occurs during binges when sufferers eat without tasting and without the ability to stop. French researchers found alexithymic-like emotion-processing deficits (for example, the inability to identify and describe the subject’s own feeling states) as well as mindsight deficits (impaired ability to understand other’s emotional experience), in people with ED (Bydlowski et al., 2005). These test subjects also appeared to be easily overwhelmed by emotional circumstances, and appeared to use food to control intense affective experiences. Dissociation is the neural mechanism of PTSD (van der Kolk & Fisler, 1995; van der Kolk, 2002). In a review of the ED and PTSD literature, Mantero and Crippa (2002) propose that ED may be a presenting complaint of an undiagnosed PTSD and suggest that clinicians who treat ED should be well-versed in the treatment of acute and chronic trauma. They point to the higher incidence of ED in the PTSD population, noting that ED and PTSD patients show similar trauma histories, which we know from the neuroscience literature are etched into the RH. Subjects with a history of PTSD-related dissociation demonstrate an increase in body dissatisfaction, when compared to the controls; thus, traumatized individuals may use ED as a coping strategy (Beato, Rodrıguez & Belmonte, 2003).

ATTACHMENT THEORY, AFFECT-REGULATION THEORY, AND EATING DISORDERS When attachment theory, the collective body of research around this early development, is seen as the bonding process that not only creates a strong emotional link between parents and their infants that serves to protect the infant’s life, but also the process that instills in the young the ability to self-regulate or modulate its own arousal, it becomes “affect-regulation theory” (Schore & Schore, 2008). As the name implies, Schore’s affect-regulation model posits that a developmental deficit in the capacity to regulate powerful affect underlies the major forms of psychological pathology and clinical symptomatology. Thus, through the lens of affect-regulation theory, and the neuroscience that informs it, ED can be thought of as affect-regulation disorders unconsciously devised to externally manage excess arousal, stress, and anxiety, in order to compensate for inadequate wiring in the emotion-regulating circuits of the brain, mind, and body, and in the neural reward centers of the brain. In this


ATTACHMENT THEORY, AFFECT-REGULATION THEORY, AND EATING DISORDERS

43

way, food becomes an external regulator, a way to control intense affective experiences that otherwise threaten to overwhelm the individual.

Eating Disorders and Attachment A review of the literature linking disturbances in attachment with ED (Ward, Ramsay & Treasure, 2000) found tentative but compelling evidence that children with dismissive parenting and subsequent avoidant attachment styles are more likely to develop AN, while those with preoccupied parenting, and the resulting anxious/resistant attachment styles, are more likely to develop BN. A more recent study by Zhang, Li & Zhou (2008) examined brain responses to facial expression by adults with different attachment styles, and found attachment to be a powerful predictor of emotional processing. Anxious individuals were more, and avoidant individuals less, reactive in various areas of their brains to emotional stimuli. The human face is one of the most powerful emotional triggers. In the study, the anxiously attached subjects turned on more of their brain structures related to attentional processing than did secure subjects. Avoidantly attached subjects turned on fewer of those centers and with less metabolic activation, than did either their anxious or secure counterparts When insecure attachment co-exists with trauma, especially in the first 18 months of life, neuroimaging shows impairment of the right hemisphere that predisposes children toward disorders of affect-regulation and thus may set the stage for the emergence of a disordered relationship to food (Schore, 2009).

Eating Disorders and Emotion Processing Deficits Much of the research and clinical literature describes ED patients as easily overwhelmed by emotional circumstances. ED frequently coexist with anxiety disorders, and those who suffer from ED may either be less aware of emotions or have well-developed strategies to avoid experiencing their own affective states. Thus, people with ED often exhibit impaired ability to identify their own emotions (alexithymia), as well as deficits in judging others’ emotional experience (mindsight) (Bydlowski et al., 2005; Speranza, Corcos, Guilbaud, Loas & Jeammet, 2005; Treasure et al., 2005; Troop, Schmidt & Treasure, 1995). Davis and Marsh (1986) found that anorexic patients were less able to differentiate between hunger and satiety, and had difficulty differentiating their physical sensations from their emotions, which they also had difficulty describing. Their bulimic subjects often responded to stress with symptoms such as vomiting, even while they had difficulty correlating their ED behavior with any emotional stimulus.

Affect Disregulation and the Right Hemisphere A dramatic contribution of neuroscience has been to demonstrate that a single human skull houses two virtually separate brains, distinct in both structure and functioning. There are major differences between our rational, logical, analytic, conscious left hemisphere (LH) and our largely unconscious, affective, nonlogical right hemisphere (RH). The latter is dominant for empathy, attachment, and affect-regulation, and stores an internal working model of


44

3. NEUROSCIENCE

the earliest attachment relationships and the strategies of affect-regulation that were learned in them (Allan Schore, personal communication, November 19, 2005). Mounting evidence (Lacey, 1986; Meyer, Waller & Waters, 1998; Schore, 2003a) supports an affect-regulation model of ED as a primarily RH phenomenon. Although the etiology is complex (McManus & Waller, 1995), many, if not most, ED triggers originate in the unconscious subcortical RH. Experimental studies (Meyer & Waller, 1997, 1999; Waller & Mijatovich, 1998) have found that subliminal abandonment cues, presented too rapidly to be detected or reported consciously (Bornstein, 1990; Silverman, 1983), are processed unconsciously in the RH, and result in higher levels of food consumed. This effect was not observed when the presentation of the threat cue was longer, and perceived consciously. The subliminal perception of abandonment may lead to increased bulimic behavior, and binge eating may reduce negative affect through an “anesthetic” effect, a kind of spacing out, or escape behavior, that inhibits the learning of more mature coping (i.e., affect-regulation) strategies (Hallings-Pott et al., 2005). Inversely, the subliminal presentation of unification cues, such as “friendship,” decreased the amount of food consumed (Waller & Barter, 2005).

THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS Such RH subliminal activation of the thoughts and affect underlying disordered eating implies the need for deeply relational and intersubjective therapeutic approaches, with an emphasis on RH resonance, rather than an exclusive reliance on LH cognitively constructed analysis and verbal interpretations (Waller & Barter, 2005). Thus, the goal of psychotherapy should be to enhance the ability for affect-regulation in our ED patients with approaches that activate the RH. By the age of three, we largely rely on LH functions of thought, language, and the capacity to consciously analyze our experiences. But throughout life, cortical and deep subcortical RH information about what to expect, and “how to be” in relationships continues to exert powerful influence over both behavioral and emotional aspects of our lives, though it remains largely outside our conscious awareness, encoded in implicit (unconscious) procedural (body) memory (Schore, 2003b). In other words, we do not just think or reason our way through life; we also feel and sense our way, with our affective wisdom shaping the choices that we make (Demasio, 1999). Much of our behavior merely emerges from old patterns and attachment templates, rather than logical choice. In addition, traumatic experiences are stored largely in our RH and, if they remain unresolved, can emerge later in life as dysregulated energy and/or as compensatory patterns of behavioral acting-out that we label as psychopathology. Effective treatment of ED requires the fostering of affect-modulating centers in the prefrontal cortices that developed relationally in infancy. This wiring of one brain through interaction with another brain extends well beyond childhood and is the psychoneurobiological basis for the healing potential of important relationships, including the deeply attuned dyad in psychotherapy (Safran & Muran, 2000). Evidence is accumulating that poorly wired circuits of interactive regulation, especially those between higher and lower centers on the right side of the brain, can literally be rewired in the therapist/patient dyad (Schwartz &


THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS

45

Begley, 2002; Linden, 2006). This can lead to an individual’s increased ability to modulate their own emotional experiences. The key is to connect with our patients’ nonverbal, emotional RHs. For psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapists, this means more emphasis on “the primacy of affect” and less on cognitively constructed analysis and verbal interpretations (Allan Schore, personal communication, November 19, 2005). In general, psychotherapy must include more than verbal, investigative, and insight-based approaches to change; it must activate the deep subcortical recesses of the unconscious mind where our attachment templates have been laid down and trauma has been stored. The effective therapeutic dyad uses the same processes that occur between parents and infants in secure attachments (attunement, empathy, and resonance), to reactivate and rewire RH procedural templates from childhood. Through this exquisite attunement and timely coregulation within the therapeutic dyad, the ED individual’s capacity for regulation, discernment, and impulse control improve, as higher centers become better at turning down lower centers of primitive arousal (Beer & Lombardo, 2007). To achieve this, psychotherapy must be an emotional, affective, somatic experience in the context of an intimate relationship and environment safe enough to enable experience of emotions and body sensations, even those that prove frightful or full of pain.

Left Hemisphere Cognitive, Conscious Strategies for Affect-Regulation During its earliest, formative years, the infant has no verbal processing LH; this area of the brain does not begin to myelinate until the end of the second year of life. Once LH neural pathways are in place, given sufficient processing time, the slower LH can exert a regulating influence over the more emotional RH. We can use the verbal capacities of the LH to both dysregulate ourselves with anxious thoughts and imagined catastrophes, and to regulate ourselves and one another through calming soothing thoughts, and verbal reassurances. Other LH calming strategies include intentional distraction, deliberate suppression, reappraisal, or reframing. Since Aaron Beck introduced cognitive psychotherapy in the 1970s (Beck, 1972; Beck, Rush, Shaw & Emery, 1979), clinicians have focused on the beliefs that individuals have about present or future events and the perceptions they have about their abilities to cope with these occurrences. LH-based cognitive therapy strategies have traditionally focused on evaluating the rationality of negative appraisals and beliefs, substituting more realistic, rational, or evidence-based viewpoints in their stead. In addition, the behavioral components of CBT for ED utilize patient education, self-monitoring, dietary records, shape and weight checking restraints, and verbal assessment questionnaires. Alone, or in combination with psychoactive medication, CBT has become a popular treatment model for ED (Fairburn, 2008; Waller et al., 2007). Even psychoanalytic approaches have traditionally relied more on LH-based, cognitivelyconstructed analyses and verbal interpretations to encourage insight and the subsequent emergence of the unconscious realm into conscious thought. Neuroscience research, however, demonstrates that the neural mechanisms for affect-regulation exist primarily in the unconscious RH, and it is there that we must work to foster more permanent and automatic regulatory capabilities (Schore, 2003b). In short, cognitive strategies that encourage reappraisal of a stimuli triggering threat, and training awareness to accurately read


46

3. NEUROSCIENCE

“bottom-up,” limbic system reactions of fear, anger, sadness, or shame, can improve the capacity to regulate, but a greater emphasis on RH modalities could well be the key to improving previously disappointing outcomes in ED. RH modalities are already at play, at least peripherally, in LH-based therapeutic approaches like CBT. Ideally, all therapeutic contact, including CBT, occurs in a deeply affective, attuned, sensitive, and caring RH-to-RH bond between patient and therapist. Such synchronous, empathic, and transferential interactions create greater integration within the patient’s own RH. Neural networks that had been dissociated connect again and eventually create stronger top-down, frontal lobe influences. As these high right neural centers send soothing extensions down into affective subcortical ones, affect-regulation and resiliency emerge.

Language of the Right Hemisphere The conscious LH is not only structurally and functionally distinct from the mostly unconscious, affective RH, but it uses a different system of language as well. Information is communicated through words in the LH, while in the RH, affect is transmitted by the primary process communications of the face, gesture, posture, and prosody. Beebe and Lachmann (1994) demonstrated that mothers engage in a synchronous dance of this primary-process attunement with their infants, yet are not aware, and cannot describe, what they are doing because it is happening too quickly for consciousness to track. Templates of secure attachment are built through repeated affect synchrony, as the child is met and amplified into positive peaks of joy and excitement and soothed or calmed out of states of fear or pain. In the absence of this attuned resonance, the child is left in extended states of disregulated affect and the attachment that evolves is insecure. Psychotherapists who want to modify those early neural patterns must work simultaneously in both left and right hemisphere modalities. The RH synchrony of psychotherapy develops as we learn the unique rhythms of each patient and form a dyadic system with them. This requires listening carefully to track the patient’s movements, to find their rhythm, to match their tempo and to reflect it back. We pace ourselves unconsciously to stay with them; we soften our voice, fall silent; join them in moments of humor or joy; fall into a hushed reverence. We speak with our posture, our eyes, our entire face. We are there to engage when they look up for us, wait patiently when they turn away, allow them time to recover and reengage, and sometimes reach out to them if they have moved too far away. In doing this, we form an empathic bond using our own bodies, our own somatic countertransference, and we match our own internal states with theirs so that they feel increasingly safe to drop defenses and open both to us and to their own deepening understanding of themselves. Affect gradually deepens as together we gain access to material stored deep in their emotional right brain. In this state of dyadic synchrony, interpretations or other interventions are experienced more deeply and their effects are more permanent (Allan Schore, personal communication, May 6, 2006). Powerful empirical evidence suggests that the dyadic relationship contributes the majority of healing in psychotherapy, and it is now generally acknowledged that “.the therapeutic alliance is among the most robust predictors of treatment outcomes” (Karver, Handelsman,


CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

47

Fields & Bickman, 2006, p. 35). When patients gradually learn to regulate, to stay more coherent, dissociating or fragmenting less during moments of heightened intensity, shifts occur in implicit relational patterns deep in the subcortical RH, which the LH may then later be able to translate into words. It is not, however, the words that make the changes. Rather, it is subcortical RH shifts that make the verbal awareness possible. Just moving emotional material into the left hemisphere does not suffice. If the affective material is regulated when it arrives in the LH, it becomes a coherent narrative. If it is still unregulated when it shifts left, it is disruptive and the individual may become confused, go blank or lose their train of thought (Allan Schore, personal communication, May 30, 2009).

The Body in Psychotherapy The recognition that psychotherapy must be an affective experience in order to activate the subcortical limbic regions of the RH implicates the body as well in psychotherapy since the RH, far more than the left, is deeply connected into the body through the HPA axis and the ANS (Schore, 2003a; Allan Schore, personal communication, November 19, 2005). The neurological and trauma literature have thus expanded the definition of psychotherapy from a “mind-to-mind, thought-to-thought” connection to one that communicates “body-tobody” as well. Schore says repeatedly that trauma is about dissociation (Schore, 2009), neurologically disconnecting oneself as a means of self-defense from an experience that is too powerful or otherwise unbearable. Thus, trauma recovery is about coming out of dissociation and back into awareness of the external energy coming in and the energy arising up interoceptively from one’s own corporeal self. Healing from ED means improving the capacity to both individually and interactively regulate externally- and internally-arising energies, rather than reaching for external regulators like food, laxatives, or obsessive exercise. We differ in our capacities as therapists to notice our patients’ subtle or micro facial expressions (faster than the 500 ms it takes to be consciously seen), changes in skin color, body posture, breathing patterns, or shifts in auditory prosody. The more accurately we track these and, simultaneously, our own somatic replies, the greater our capacity to affectively resonate and know when, and if, to move in and lend a regulating hand. Thus, a major outcome of good treatment in individuals with ED is a decrease in dissociation through an increased awareness of, tolerance for, and openness to, affect and sensation arising from the body in real time.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS The Therapist, More Than the Theory, Is the Agent of Change Advances in neurological research have confirmed that a deep, safe, affective (and ideally affectionate) therapist/patient relationship is one of, if not the, central change element in psychotherapy; and, further, that the subcortical limbic system (that part of the brain that processes emotion, and is the center of the attachment relationship), is the


48

3. NEUROSCIENCE

key. Beneath the conscious models and techniques that distinguish the various schools of psychotherapy lies the therapist’s ability to create the attachment intimacy of the patient/ therapist bond, a relational process, a deep intersubjective being with that which is “beyond technique, frequently undervalued and mediated primarily by their and our more inexplicable and baffling RH” (Allan Schore, personal communication, September 27, 2008). The source of effective therapy is not so much what the therapist does for the patient, or says to the patient, as how to be with the patient, especially at moments of therapeutic rupture or when the patient’s state of being is disintegrating in real time (Safran, 2003). When patients are in an overwhelmed state of terror, hopelessness, or despair, it is the therapist’s job to be able to enter into, and hold that state with them. Although this can be enormously challenging, it is imperative, and so we do our best to stay present in our own bodies, to allow those feelings to be truly felt, and to stay connected in the relationship so the patient is not alone with them (Allan Schore, personal communication, February 11, 2006). Significant gaps in our knowledge of the neurobiology underlying ED (as well as other mental disorders) persist, due to the difficulties of mapping the complex neural circuitry of higher brain functioning, and the complexity of sorting genetic and epigenetic developmental contributions (Hyman, 2007). Despite these limitations, neurobiological research will be an increasingly essential tool in helping us rethink our current approaches to the treatment of ED. In the meantime, it is safe to conclude that it is in relationships that we first emerge into our full neural complexity, and it is in relationships that we must heal.

References Agras, W. S., & Telch, C. F. (1998). The effects of caloric deprivation and negative affect on binge eating in obese binge-eating disordered women. Behavior Therapy, 29, 491e503. Amaral, D. G., Price, J. L., Pitkanen, A., & Carmichael, S. T. (1992). Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction (pp. 1e66). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss. Armstrong, J. G., & Roth, D. M. (1989). Attachment and separation difficulties in eating disorders: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 8(2), 141e155. Arnow, B., Kenardy, J., & Agras, W. S. (1992). Binge-eating among the obese: A descriptive study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 155e170. Beato, L., Rodrıguez, T., & Belmonte, C. A. (2003). Relationship of dissociative experiences to body shape concerns in eating disorders. European eating disorders Review, 11, 38e45. Beck, A. T. (1972). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1994). Representation and internalization in infancy: Three principles of salience. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 11, 127e166. Beer, J. S., & Lombardo, M. V. (2007). Insights into emotion regulation from neuropsychology. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 69e86). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Bergen, A., Yeager, M., Welch, R., Haque, K., Ganjei, J. K., VandenBree, M. B., . Kaye, W. H. (2005). Association of multiple DRD2 polymorphisms with anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 1703e1710. Bornstein, R. F. (1990). Critical importance of stimulus unawareness for the production of subliminal psychodynamic activation effects: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 201e210. Bydlowski, S., Corcos, M., Jeammet, P., Paterniti, S., Berthoz, S., Laurier, C., . Consoli, S. M. (2005). EmotionProcessing deficits in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, 321e329.


CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

49

Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12(3), 307e330. Davidson, R. J., Fox, A., & Kalin, N. H. (2007). Neural bases of emotion regulation in nonhuman primates and humans. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 47e68). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Davis, M. S., & Marsh, L. (1986). Self-love, self-control and alexithymia: Narcissistic features of two bulimic adolescents. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 15, 224e232. De Berardis, D., Serroni, N., Campanella, D., Carano, A., Gambi, F., Valchera, A.,. Ferro, F. M. (2009). Alexithymia and its relationships with dissociative experiences: Body dissatisfaction and eating disturbances in a non-clinical female sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 333(5), 471e479. Accessed via Superlink, published online: 6 May 2009. Demasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace. Dusoir, H., Owens, C., Forbes, R. B., Morrow, J., Flynn, P., & McCarron, M. (2005). Anorexia nervosa remission following left thalamic stroke. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 76, 144e145. Everill, J., & Waller, G. (1995). Dissociation and bulimia: Research and theory. European Eating Disorders Review, 3, 129e147. Everill, J., Waller, G., & Macdonald, W. (1995). Dissociation in bulimic and non-eating-disordered women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 127e134. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fernandez-Aranda, F., Pinheiro, A. P., Tozzi, F., La Via, M., Thornton, L. M., Plotnicov, K. H., . Bulik, C. M. (2007). Symptom profile and temporal relation of major depressive disorder in females with eating disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 24e31. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press. Grunwald, M., Etrrich, C., Assmann, B., Daehne, A., & Krause, W. (2001). Deficits in haptic perception and right parietal theta power changes in patients with anorexia nervosa before and after weight gain. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 417e428. Hallings-Pott, C., Waller, D. G., Watson, D., & Scragg, P. (2005). State dissociation in bulimic eating disorders: An experimental study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 37e41. Hopper, J., Frewen, P., van der Kolk, B., & Lanius, R. (2007). Neural correlates of reexperiencing, avoidance, and dissociation in PTSD: Symptom dimensions and emotion dysregulation in responses to script-driven trauma imagery. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(5), 713e725. Hyman, S. (2007). Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nature Reviews/Neuroscience, 8, 725e732. Karver, M. C., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, S., & Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy. The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Reviews, 26, 50e65. Keel, P. K., Klump, K. L., Miller, K. B., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Shared transmission of eating disorders and anxiety disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 99e105. Lacey, J. H. (1986). Pathogenesis. In L. J. Downey & J. C. Malkin (Eds.), Current approaches: Bulimia nervosa (pp. 17e26). Southampton, England: Duphar. Linden, D. E. J. (2006). How psychotherapy changes the brain e the contribution of functional neuroimaging. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 528e538. Mantero, M., & Crippa, L. (2002). Eating disorders and chronic PTSD: Issues of psychopathology and comorbidity. European Eating Disorders Review, 10(1), 1e16. McCormick, L. M., Keel, P. K., Brumm, M. C., Bowers, W., Swayze, V., Andersen, A., & Andreason, N. (2008). Implications of starvation-induced change in right dorsal anterior cingulate volume in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 602e610. McManus, F., & Waller, G. (1995). A functional analysis of binge eating. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 845e865. Meyer, C., & Waller, G. (1997). The impact of emotion upon eating behavior: The role of subliminal visual processing of threat cues. United Kingdom: University of Southampton, Department of Psychology. Meyer, C., Waller, G., & Waters, A. (1998). Emotional states and bulimic psychopathology. In H. Hoek, M. Katzman, & J. Treasure (Eds.), The neurobiological basis of eating disorders (pp. 271e289). Chichester, England: Wiley. Meyer, C., & Waller, G. (1999). The impact of emotion upon eating behaviour: The role of subliminal visual processing of threat cues. International Journal of eating disorders, 25, 319e326.


50

3. NEUROSCIENCE

National Alliance on Mental Illness. (1996). Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Retrieved from http:// www.nami.org/Content/ContentGroups/Helpline1/Eating_Disorder_Not_Otherwise_Specified_(EDNOS).htm O’Donnell, T. O., Hegadoren, K. M., & Coupland, N. C. (2004). Noradrenergic mechanisms in the pathophysiology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychobiology, 50(4), 273e283. O’Kearney, R. (1996). Attachment disruption in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A review of theory and empirical research. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20(2), 115e127. Porges, S. W. (1995). Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology, 32, 301e318. Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York, NY: Morrow. Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Safran, J. D. (2003). The relational turn, the therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 59(3), 449e473. Scaer, R. (2000). The body bears the burden: Trauma, dissociation and disease. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc. Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. New Jersey: Lawrence Erldbaum Associates. Schore, A. N. (1996). The experience-dependent maturation of a regulatory system in the orbital prefrontal cortex and the origin of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 59e87. Schore, A. N. (1997). Early organization of the nonlinear right brain and development of a predisposition to psychiatric disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 595e631. Schore, A. N. (2001a). The effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 7e66. Schore, A. N. (2001b). The effects of relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 201e269. Schore, A. N. (2003a). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. Schore, A. N. (2003b). Affect dysregulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. Schore, A. N. (2009). Attachment trauma and the developing right brain: Origins of pathological dissociation. In P. Dell, & J. O’Neil (Eds.), Dissociation and dissociative disorders (pp. 107e141). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group. Schore, J. R., & Schore, A. N. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 9e20. Schwartz, J. M., & Begley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Silverman, L. H. (1983). The subliminal psychodynamic activation method: Overview and comprehensive listing of studies. In J. Masling (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories, 1 (pp. 69e100). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum. Speranza, M., Corcos, M., Guilbaud, O., Loas, G., & Jeammet, P. (2005). Alexithymia, personality, and psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(5), 1029e1030. Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., & Small, D. M. (2008). Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele. Science, 322(5900), 449e452. Treasure, J., Tchanturia, K., & Ulrike, S. (2005). Developing a model of the treatment for eating disorder: Using neuroscience research to examine the how rather than the what of change. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5(3), 191e202. Troop, N. A., Schmidt, U. H., & Treasure, J. L. (1995). Feelings and fantasy in eating disorders: A factor analysis of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18(2), 151e157. van der Kolk, B. A. (2002). Post-traumatic therapy in the age of neuroscience. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(3), 381e392. van der Kolk, B. A., & Fisler, R. (1995). Dissociation and the fragmentary nature of traumatic memories: Overview and exploratory study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(4), 505e525. Wagner, A., Aizenstein, H., Mazurkewicz, L., Fudge, I., Frank, G. K., Putnam, K., . Kaye, W. H. (2008). Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33, 513e523. Waller, G., & Mijatovich, S. (1998). Preconscious processing of threat cues: Impact upon eating upon women with unhealthy eating attitudes. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 24, 83e89.


CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

51

Waller, G., Babbs, M., Wright, F., Potterton, C., Meyer, C., & Leung, N. (2003). Somatoform dissociation in eatingdisordered patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(5), 619e627. Waller, G., & Barter, G. (2005). The impact of subliminal abandonment and unification cues on eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, 156e160. Waller, G., Cordery, H., Corstorphine, E., Hinrichsen, H., Lawson, V., Mountford, V., & Russell, K. (2007). Cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders: A comprehensive treatment guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Ward, A., Ramsay, R., & Treasure, J. (2000). Attachment research in eating disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 35e51. Winfrey, Oprah (2008). Oprah’s weight loss confession. O, The Oprah Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.oprah. com/slideshow/oprahshow/20081030_tows_bobgreene Wonderlich, S. A., Connolly, K. M., & Stice, E. (2004). Impulsivity as a risk factor for eating disorder behavior: Assessment implications with adolescents. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36(2), 172e182. Zhang, X., Li, T., & Zhou, X. (2008). Brain responses to facial expression by adults with different attachmentorientations. NeuroReport, 19(4), 437e441.


C H A P T E R

4 Are Media an Important Medium for Clinicians? Mass Media, Eating Disorders, and the Bolder Model of Treatment, Prevention, and Advocacy Michael P. Levine and Margo Maine Advocacy and activism challenge us to take a moral and ethical stand with regard to the touchiest issues within our organizations, to publicly articulate our stand, and to risk the displeasure, if not the wrath, of those who hold power and authority. It may mean being unpopular, becoming a lightning rod for the anger and resistance of colleagues, and at times, it may mean being willing to put our jobs on the line in order to do the right thing (Grieger & Ponterotto, 1998, p. 31, quoted in Vera & Speight, 2007, p. 377) The role of mass media in the development and maintenance of the spectrum of negative body image (BI) and disordered eating (DE) is a “touchy issue” in the field of eating disorders (ED) (Levine & Murnen, 2009; Smolak, Levine & Murnen, 2006). Many find the media’s status as a cause of body dissatisfaction, a drive for thinness, ambivalence about food, and ED to be self-evident. Others, including an increasing number of parents and bio-psychiatric scientist-practitioners, see this contention as, at best, an irritating distraction from the need to acknowledge that ED are severe, self-sustaining psychiatric illnesses with a genetic, biochemical basis (Bulik, 2004; Klump, Bullik, Kaye, Treasure & Tyson, 2009). At worst, many research-oriented clinicians are concerned that a psychosocial or sociocultural perspective, in contrast to a biopsychiatric perspective, will add to the already troubling “blame-based stigma associated with anorexia nervosa” and other ED (Crisafulli, Von Holle & Bulik, 2008, p. 333). This chapter is designed to educate and support clinicians who wish to integrate theory and research concerning mass media into the treatment and prevention of negative BI and DE, as well as into their own professional and personal development. After a brief review of the current status of research pertaining to mass media as a causal risk factor for clinically

Treatment of Eating Disorders doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375668-8.10004-X

53


54

4. ARE MEDIA AN IMPORTANT MEDIUM FOR CLINICIANS?

significant levels of negative BI and DE, we consider the implications of that work for treatment, prevention, and advocacy.1 As a researcher and a clinician collaborating on this chapter, we both find the scientific research supporting the role of the media in the risk factors associated with ED to be a remarkable validation of what some clinicians and many patients frequently discuss. When science and practice come together as these two areas do, it speaks to the tremendous work that both academicians and clinicians have contributed to this field.

SOCIOCULTURAL MODELS OF RISK “Sociocultural” models of risk propose that macro-level cultural influences shape the content and the forms of those mass media, peer interaction, and parental variables that have considerable empirical support as risk factors in BI disturbances and eating problems (Becker & Fay, 2006; Smolak, 2009; Smolak et al., 2006). The challenge is to define the critical “content” and “messages,” determine the extent of individual exposure and assimilation, and then establish how these contribute to the risk of ED (Anderson-Fye & Becker, 2004; Becker & Fay, 2006). Substantial evidence suggests that the “Eating Disorders” recognized by the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) are composite expressions, to varying degrees, of dimensions such as negative emotionality, binge eating, and unhealthy forms of weight and shape management. In most cases, these features reflect a combination of negative BI and negative self-concept. For females, “body dissatisfaction” results from, and feeds, a schema easily found in the content of mass media. It is also comprised of four fundamental and culturally normative components: (i) a conviction that weight and shape are central determinants of one’s identity; (ii) the idealization of slenderness and leanness; (iii) an irrational fear of fat; and (iv) the tyranny of “I must demonstrate my control over my body and its appetites, and I should be able to do this” (Gordon, 2000; Levine & Harrison, 2009; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Smolak & Levine, 1996). Sociocultural models explain the multidimensional processes feeding the development of disorders. They do not deny that the disorders themselves typically reflect self-sustaining, chronic, extremely serious, and sometimes degenerative, and even life-threatening, processes that are rooted in a complex interplay between biopsychology, behavior, and interpersonal environments (Smolak et al., 2006). Nor do sociocultural models deny a role for genetics and/or neurobiology in either the individual risk for, or the progression of, ED. However, sociocultural models do argue that multiple pathways lead to similar outcomes. Moreover, in contrast to the mountain of evidence supporting the sociocultural impact, no evidence indicates that the majority of cases of DE are attributable to genetic vulnerability (Levine, 2009b; Smolak & Levine, 1994; Smolak et al., 2006). In fact, as behavior geneticists themselves have long argued, rare conditions can be explained by the multiplicative interaction of risk factors commonly distributed in a population (Levine & Smolak, 2009). Certain people will 1

Although the relationships between mass media, negative body image, and unhealthy behaviors in males are receiving increasing attention (see, e.g., Pope, Phillips & Olivardia, 2000; Ricciardelli, McCabe, Williams & Thompson, 2007), this review concentrates on females.


SOCIOCULTURAL MODELS OF RISK

55

have a genetic vulnerability placing them at high risk for an ED (Bulik, 2004), but the Rose Paradox demonstrates that the majority of cases of a disorder emerge from those at moderate to lower risk because they are simply more numerous than those at high risk (Austin, 2001). As stated in Chapter 1 (Maine and Bunnell), nature and nurture cannot be separated, with ED reflecting both individual and cultural risk factors.

Risk and Mass Media A risk factor is a variable that is reliably and usefully associated with an increase over time in the probability of a subsequent outcome. Table 4.1 presents a summary of the argument for mass media as a causal risk factor by showing the necessary conditions (left-hand column), the status of the evidence, and representative citations for further reference. Readers who wish more detailed information are referred to literature reviews by Harrison and Hefner (2008), Levine and Harrison (2009), and Levine and Murnen (2009), and to a meta-analysis by Grabe, Ward & Hyde (2008). Here are our seven basic conclusions from the voluminous and burgeoning research on mass media, BI, and DE. First, mass media are a major part of the lives of children, adolescents, and adults in many countries around the world (Anderson-Fye & Becker, 2004). Second, the content of mass media provides multiple, overlapping, and, all too often, unhealthy messages about gender, attractiveness, ideal body sizes and shapes, self-control, desire, food, and weight management. These messages indoctrinate developing girls and boys with insidious themes, such as: (i) women are “naturally” invested in their beauty assets; (ii) a slender, youthful attractive “image” is truly substantive, because it pleases males and demonstrates being “in control” to females; and (iii) the sources of ideals about attractiveness, style, and the best practices for becoming and staying beautiful are located outside the self (Levine & Harrison, 2009; Smolak & Levine, 1994, 1996; Smolak & Murnen, 2004, 2007). Thus, the slender beauty ideal, framed by other cultivated aspects of the feminine sex role, is not perceived as a mythic fantasy, but rather as ubiquitous, accepted by most people, and both normal and achievable (Thompson, Heinberg, Altabe & Tantleff-Dunn, 1999). Third, cross-sectional surveys generally indicate modest but significant positive correlations between level of exposure to mass media and the important triad of body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internationalization, and DE. However, we still have much to learn about the relationship between frequency and intensity of naturalistic media exposure and DE. Fourth, although there are surprisingly few longitudinal studies, and, therefore, much more research is needed, the available literature suggests that, for young people, the extent of media exposure predicts increases in negative BI and DE (Van den Berg, NeumarkSztainer, Hannan & Haines, 2007), However, by early adolescence, the causal risk factor may not necessarily be media exposure, or even internalization of the slender beauty ideal, but rather the intensity and extent of “core beliefs and assumptions about the importance, meaning, and effect of appearance in an individual’s life” (Tiggemann, 2006, p. 528). Fifth, concentrated exposure to the media’s slender ideal tends to produce an immediate and moderately large negative effect in how girls and women feel about their bodies and their selves. This appears to be true for content from magazines and television, as well as pro-anorexia web sites (Bardone-Cone & Cass, 2007) and video games featuring thin


56 TABLE 4.1


Status of Evidence for Mass Media as a Causal, Variable Risk Factor for Negative Body Image and Disordered Eating

Criterion

Status of Evidence

1. Content

Strong

Further Reference

Slenderness is normative, attractive, attainable

Harrison & Hefner (2006); Thompson, van den Berg, Roehrig, Guarda & Heinberg (2004)

Fat is ugly and horrible: indicative of sloth, greed, extravagance, gluttony, and pride

Himes & Thompson (2007); Puhl & Latner (2007)

2. Exposure

Strong

Comstock & Scharrer (2007); Roberts, Foehr & Rideout (2005)

3. Positive correlation between SDE and level and/or type(s) of exposure: Cross-sectional studies Television

Moderate e Strong

Magazines

Moderate e Strong

Grabe et al. (2008); Murnen, Levine, Groesz & Smith (2007)

Longitudinal studies Television

Moderate e Preliminary

Magazines

Weak e preliminary

4. Controlled laboratory experiments assessing Strong immediate effects of media content

Dohnt & Tiggemann (2006); Harrison & Hefner (2006); Tiggemann (2006) Grabe et al. (2008); Groesz, Levine & Murnen (2002)

5. Subjective reports of desire to look like media “figures,” perceived media pressures, and internalization of media ideals of beauty Cross-sectional studies

Strong

See reviews by Cafri, Yamamiya, Brannick & Thompson (2005); Levine & Harrison (2009); Levine & Murnen (2009); Murnen et al. (2007)

Longitudinal studies


Stice (2002); see discussion by Levine & Murnen (2009)

Media literacy as prevention Controlled laboratory studies (analogs)

Strong

Brief field studies

Moderate e Strong

Intensive field studies


Selective-targeted prevention

Moderate e Strong

See reviews by Levine (2009); Levine & Kelly (in press); Levine & Harrison (2009); Levine & Smolak (2006, Chapter 13)

Note. In the Status of Evidence column, the designation of “preliminary” means that there are relatively few studies and/or the studies that have been done include variables that are, for various reasons, not direct reflections of the construct.


SOCIOCULTURAL MODELS OF RISK

57

characters (Barlett & Harris, 2008). This “contrast effect” appears to be appreciably greater in females who are heavily invested in appearance concerns and/or who are already selfconscious and otherwise sensitive about their body shape (Groesz, Levine, & Murnen, 2002). A longitudinal study by Hargreaves and Tiggemann (2003) showed that adolescent girls whose BI was most negatively affected by experimental exposure to television commercials featuring the thin ideal had greater levels of body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness two years later, even when initial level of body dissatisfaction was controlled. Sixth, if mass media are a causal risk factor in a psychological sense, then one should be able to determine their subjective influence in terms of ideals, motives, and experienced pressures. In general, studies of adolescent girls in various countries reveal that over two thirds feel that images in magazines do influence their conception of the “perfect body shape,” while a significant minority report that such images motivate them to lose weight. Crosssectional and longitudinal studies of adolescents and young women indicate that a clear desire to look like celebrities and models emerges as a strong predictor of weight concerns, dieting, binge-eating, and unhealthy weight management (see Levine & Harrison, 2009, and Levine & Murnen, 2009, for reviews). Normative beliefs about the social world, as emphasized in mass media, become subjective beliefs and attitudes about the self and about what others believe and expect. Meta-analysis clearly shows that extent of self-reported media exposure correlates moderately with internalization of the slender beauty ideal (Grabe et al., 2008; Murnen, Levine, Groesz, & Smith, 2007). Cross-sectional research with middle and high school girls and undergraduate women (reviewed in Levine & Harrison, 2009, and Levine & Murnen, 2009) shows consistently that self-reported levels of perceived pressure from media and of internalization of the slender beauty ideal are highly correlated with each other. Individually, these two variables are each strong predictors of precursors of weight-and-body-dissatisfaction, unhealthy weight management, and DE. In support of these correlation-based findings, level of thin-ideal internalization has consistently been identified in experimental studies as a moderator of media effects (Levine & Murnen, 2009; Dittmar, Halliwell & Stirling, 2009). Media Literacy Thanks in large part to Stice (2002), the ED field now accepts that prevention studies are an essential component of “basic research” designed to clarify etiology. Thus, the seventh and final criterion: if media effects are a causal and variable risk factor, then reduction or elimination of negative media influences should reduce or prevent negative BI and other processes that, for some, eventually result in ED. As is the case with most important phenomena in the behavioral sciences, “media literacy” is easy to talk about but difficult to define (Levine & Kelly, in press; Levine & Smolak, 2006). In general, “Media Literacy” refers to “the process of critically analyzing and learning to create one’s own messages in print, audio, video, and multimedia” (Hobbs, 1998, p. 16). The first step in developing media literacy is establishing a collaboration between children or teens and their mentors that allows them to work together to understand and analyze the nature of mass media and one’s relationships with them (Levine, 2009a; Levine & Harrison, 2004, 2009; Levine & Piran, 2004; Levine & Smolak, 2006).The next step involves active creative, well-planned efforts to translate the knowledge gained from a critical consciousness into activism toward offensive media and into advocacy of healthier messages. Learning how


58


to create and use media, as well as how to “read” them, builds and reinforces advocacy skills involving research, problem-solving, assertion, and communication, as well as expanding the enjoyment and appreciation of media. These are the same “life skills” repeatedly found to play an important role in the long-term prevention of substance abuse (Botvin, 2000). This approach to media literacy is part of a larger empowerment model of prevention developed by Piran (2001), Levine and Piran (2004), and Levine and Smolak (2006). It links media literacy directly to the “six Cs” of effective prevention work (Levine and Smolak, 2006): Connection, Consciousness-raising, Competence-building, the experience of Choice, participation in Change, and the Courage to be committed (or the Commitment to courage, defined as taking bold, existential action in the face of anxiety and doubt; May, 1958).2 Body-relevant media literacy programs have the potential to improve culture by redefining the body as a site of public and effective action, not private self-consciousness, shame, and silence (Piran, 2001). Systematic investigations of media literacy can be categorized into analog laboratory studies, brief interventions, and longer, more intensive programs (see Levine, 2009a; Levine & Kelly, in press; Levine & Smolak, 2006, 2009). Briefly, the findings from all three categories are promising but inconclusive. To date, there have been no direct, well-controlled, long-term studies of whether media literacy in particular can prevent development of negative BI and the spectrum of DE. We can with confidence state that: (i) brief training in media literacy as a critical social perspective can mitigate the immediate negative effects of exposure to the thin ideal; and (ii) more systematic, intensive interventions over days or weeks can significantly reduce one important risk factor: internalization of the slender ideal.

Are Mass Media a Causal Risk Factor? It is nearly impossible to comprehend how appearance concerns, body dissatisfaction, and unhealthy eating and weight management could have become so prevalent, so influential, and, indeed, normative across age, socioeconomic status, cultures, and subcultures in the absence of mass communications. Yet, as typically happens in the development of an important research area, the empirical evidence is simultaneously supportive, ambiguous, occasionally negative, and, all too often, absent. Nevertheless, based on the weight of the empirical evidence (see Table 4.1), we conclude that the mass media, in and of themselves, and certainly in the social context of multiple, overlapping, synergistic messages and reinforcements (Gordon, 2000; Smolak & Levine, 1996; Thompson et al., 1999), are a possible causal risk factor. Yet, to honor the evidence-based “attitude” of the scientistepractitionereadvocate, we acknowledge that the following have not, to date, been demonstrated conclusively and persuasively: (i) direct engagement with mass media, or media effects mediated by parents and/or peers, precedes development of the more proximal risk factors such as negative BI; (ii) prevention programs can both increase media literacy and thereby reduce or eliminate negative media influences, and in turn reduce or delay development of proximal risk factors (e.g., internalization of the thin ideal, social comparison tendencies); and (iii) there is 2 In the course of writing this chapter, it was discovered that the process of formulating the six Cs of prevention (see Levine & Smolak, 2006) occurred independently of the work of McWhirter and McWhirter (2007) in developing their five Cs of empowerment, even though the lists overlap in terms of collaboration, consciousness-raising, and competence.


THE PERSONAL: EATING DISORDER PROFESSIONAL AS ROLE MODEL

59

a compelling conceptual framework for how media effects are shaped and moderated by characteristics such as age, developmental stage, race, ethnicity, gender, and macro-culture (Levine & Harrison, 2009; Levine & Smolak, 2006). To reiterate, “engagement with mass media is probably best considered a variable risk factor that might well be later shown to be a causal risk factor” (Levine & Murnen, 2009, p. 32). That said, the field cannot afford to wait for full clarification of these issues (Levine & Smolak, 2008). The more proximal determinants of risk influenced by mass media, peers, families, and other sociocultural sourcesdincluding internalization of the slender or muscular beauty ideal, social comparison tendencies, sexual objectification of the female body, and implicit and explicit prejudice against fat peopledare supported by a large confluence of research (Puhl & Latner, 2007; Smolak & Murnen, 2004; Thompson & Stice, 2001). All the influential models of prevention agree that the “professional,” the “political,” and the “personal” are each significant aspects of the work (e.g., Levine, 1994; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Maine, 2000; Maine, Davis & Shure, 2009; Piran, 2001). This position is captured poignantly in the late Lori Irving’s (1999) call for prevention specialists from all sectors of the academic, advocacy, and government worlds to transcend the venerable “scientist-practitioner” model (i.e., the “Boulder” model of clinical training) to embrace a broader and deeper model of professional work that embodies, figuratively and literally, a “Bolder” model of the scientist-activist-and-practitioner of what she or he preaches. The considerable research supporting the media as a risk factor for BI and ED reinforces the ability of clinicians to strongly attest to the role of cultural variables in the development of individual problems while providing specific findings that clinicians can use to augment their clinical insights regarding how patients can best mobilize their defenses against the toxic effects of our culture as they address their ED. Thus, clinicians owe it to their clients to develop and embody a critical social perspective (Maine, 2000; Piran, 2001; Steiner-Adair, 1994; Levine & Piran, 2004) and to embrace a Bolder Model of being in a culture that is so toxic for ED clients, their families, children at risk, and for the professionals who are devoted to them (Irving, 1999; Maine, 2000; Piran, 2001).

THE PERSONAL: EATING DISORDER PROFESSIONAL AS ROLE MODEL The following is a partial list of what ED specialists can do to be “bolder” in taking their own stance against ED.

Be an Activist Prevention and health promotion start with many “little things.” Instead of receiving gifts for your birthday, ask that money be given to prevention organizations, or to local libraries for the purchase of relevant books and videos. Talk often about commercials, advertisements, billboards, jokes, etc., that objectify women or men, glorify slenderness, or treat fat people in disrespectful ways. Write to companies to protest such practices, or to praise positive images and statements in the media. Encourage service organizations or civic groups to raise money and to collaborate with local organizations to promote positive BI, healthy eating and activity levels, and youth leadership. The schools are an important focus of these efforts, as are Girl


60


Scouts, 4-H, equestrian clubs, theater programs (Haines, Neumark-Sztainer & Morris, 2008) and similar groups. Work with local newspapers, television, and radio to “cover” your innovative partnerships. And, each time you take such action, talk about your commitments and what they mean to you.

Promote “Media Literacy” and Other Forms of “Cultural Literacy” Consciousness-raising is a key component of the Bolder Model. Renowned prevention specialist Niva Piran often talks about the importance of “cultural literacy” as she teaches how to analyze various cultural influences (e.g., weight-related teasing or jokes) in terms of what is present, what is absent, what the potential negative effects are, and who benefits as some suffer. Use your creative powers and those of others (Connection in the six Cs) to develop opportunities to discuss and critically evaluate society’s obsession with images of what it considers beautiful, and how this propaganda expresses cultural pressures for girls and women to be thin, beautiful, and sexy. Consider how the increasing objectification of the male body as a symbol of “sleek, masculine, muscular power” may be contributing to men’s ideas about women as the object of that power, to people’s attitudes about “fat” and “thin” for both sexes, and thus to the emergence of BI disorders among males as well. Enhancing “literacy” does not mean confronting and lecturing people on the evils of their preferred forms of mass media, nor does it mean substituting pseudo-intellectual cynicism for mindless consumption of media. An exception should be made for pornography. Mass media are a powerful tool in a democracy, but like all powerful tools they require safety glasses (E. Austin, personal communication, April, 1996). Sometimes cultural literacy means no more than reminding oneself and significant others of our values and the choices we make when we engage with (use) certain types of magazines, TV programs, and web sites. Other times it means cancelling magazine subscriptions, or writing an op-ed or letter to the editor in response to offensive images.

Take a Stand and a Stance Against Weight-ist Prejudice Cultural literacy brings us back to the processes of Commitment and Change. We need to avoid making, and we need to confront, prejudicial comments and jokes about weight. Let family, friends, educators, and companies know that making fun of fat people is cruel and offensive, as is the implication that slender people are somehow ”superior.” Actively, assertively, and, if necessary, angrily convey your dislike for tasteless items, such as greeting cards, that proclaim things like “no fat chicks” or “nothing tastes as good as being thin.”

Take a Stance Against “Object-ification” Sexual “object-ification” is the set of processes whereby people are socialized to think of the female body in particular as an object intended primarily for the visual stimulation or other pleasures of males (Smolak & Murnen, 2004). Obvious sources of objectification include pornography, sexist “mainstream” movies, and teasing. Females and males committed to prevention of negative BI and DE should do whatever they can to criticize and reject such objectification, as well as other forms of sexual harassment and sexual violence (Levine, 1994, 2006).


THE PROFESSIONAL: BEING A BOLDER CLINICIAN

61

THE PROFESSIONAL: BEING A BOLDER CLINICIAN The Place of Media Literacy and Activism in Therapy In the treatment process, most clinicians provide psycho-education about the multiple contributions to ED. Discussing the media and their impact on the individual, as well as on our collective attitudes toward women and their bodies, should be included in psychoeducation because it contextualizes the individual problem. Certainly, therapeutic exploration of the context of the individual’s symptoms helps the patient to feel less alone, less alienated, and less deviant. For young women, endorsement of a feminist perspective reduces the strength of the connection between awareness of the media’s thin ideal and internalization of that ideal (Myers & Crowther, 2007). Perhaps, then, media literacy can actually promote recovery. Furthermore, knowing that their therapist has taken stands to challenge the objectification of women’s bodies or the glorification of thinness, many patients feel empowered, validated, and hopeful. Over the course of recovery, with an increasing understanding of the ongoing impact of media images on themselves and others, many patients decide to take a stand themselves. They may provide educational programs in their schools or communities, write letters to advertisers or to magazines, and voice their protest against media influences promulgating negative BI and DE. Patients usually find these experiences empowering. Therapists can support and validate these efforts, but must be sure not to use the patient’s activism in any way to promote themselves or their practices, and must caution them to work on their own recovery before trying to change others. Occasionally, patients are not truly ready for the exposure and challenges involved with activism in such a deeply personal, but publicly misunderstood, area. Ongoing exploration of the impact of their activism is at such times an important part of therapy, to assure that patients are addressing their primary needs and not just taking care of others, a common dynamic in ED. While therapeutic relationships are critical to recovery, patients also live in a culture that creates and sustains these disorders, so clarifying how they can manage these messages, translate them to a less toxic form, and stay centered on their own needs is a critical and ongoing discussion in treatment. Building resilience, resistance, and resources in order to navigate this culturedin the forms of family, peers, coaches, physicians, and so forth, as well as mass mediadis a key aspect of treatment. Negative cultural values may present themselves even in the context of the therapy hour, and need to be acknowledged by exploring transference, shame, powerlessness, and other manifestations of our toxic culture’s impact on women’s selves-in-relationships (Maine et al., 2009).

Continuing Education Clinicians working in this field are faced with many challenges in “keeping up” with the research literature and with advances in best practices (Maine et al., 2009). Knowledgeable therapists need to know about a dizzying array of topics, ranging from genetics and neurotransmitters, to categorical versus dimensional models of nosology, to sociocultural influences on nutrition and family meals. All clinicians working with ED must also learn, and somehow keep current with, the nature, content, and technologies of mass media (Roberts,


62


Foehr, & Rideout, 2005). A good, advanced general source on contemporary media effects can be found in Bryant and Oliver (2009).

The Office Media literacy, and a critical social perspective in general, informs the structure of a clinician’s office. The pictures on the walls, along with the magazines and books for clients and families, have tremendous meaning. We can reclaim the important role of a “model” by emphasizing images and actions of women of character who, regardless of appearance, did things such as working full time, raising a family, and caring for an ill parent, or who resisted negative cultural forces and went on to create laws, art, inventions, and other things of lasting value. The principal characters in these important narratives need not be famous people; they could just as easily be our ancestors and family members.

Assessment Females with a negative BI or an ED are particularly vulnerable to media images of the slender ideal (Dittmar et al., 2009; Groesz et al., 2002). Clients may well actively seek out ideal-body media, or even pro-anorexia or pro-bulimia web sites, for the purposes of social comparison and motivation (so-called thinspiration) to “be good” and “stay in control.” Often, the cost is, unfortunately, more negative feelings (Dittmar et al., 2009; Levine & Harrison, 2009; Trampe, Stapel & Siero, 2007). Clinicians need to determine if clients are engaged in a self-defeating cycle in which media use and “thinspirations” perpetuate their symptoms and psychopathology. Clinical assessment of media use, motivation, social comparison, and effects in relation to BI and DE is a developing area; we recommend assessments found in Thompson et al. (1999) and Thompson, Van den Berg, Roehrig, Guarda, and Heinberg (2004).3

Support of Parents and Loved Ones ED treatment usually provides patients’ loved ones with psycho-education about risk factors and the recovery process, including critical examination of media messages and the sociocultural role of women, as well as how they can help their loved one negotiate these messages. Often, men (fathers, brothers, spouses) are considering these issues for the first time; their sensitivity, and their actions (like a letter of protest to Sports Illustrated about the swimsuit issue) can be a powerful statement of support (Levine, 1994; Maine, 2004). Family members can begin to see that their role is one of many in a team effort to make health more attractive than illness, and that they are not to blame for the ED. Understanding and sharing the complex and powerful impact of the shared cultural environment may reduce their guilt, and strengthen their relationships. 3

A search of titles and abstracts in EBSCO’s on-line Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC) and in PsycInfo, using compounds such as clinical þ assessment þ mass media (or media use), yielded no published articles (CMMC and PsychInfo) and no papers presented at conferences (CMMC) on the topic of clinical assessment of media use for more effective understanding and treatment of eating disordersdor any other disorder.


A FINAL REFLECTION AS AN EXAMPLE OF ADVOCACY

63

THE POLITICAL: THERAPY, THERAPISTS, POWER, AND EMPOWERMENT A sociocultural perspective, subsuming the effects of mass media, on the etiology of DE takes an ecological approach to prevention (Levine & McVey, in press; Levine & Piran, 2004; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Maine, 2000) and assumes that professionals committed to overcoming ED are necessarily involved in promoting social justice. Reflecting the substantial literature on the relationship between clinical practice and social justice (e.g., Aladarondo, 2007; Albee, 1983; Brown, 1997), Prilleltensky, Dokecki, Frieden & Wang (2007) argue for a direct relationship between: (i) enhancing wellness through a balanced satisfaction of personal, relational, and collective needs; and (ii) enhancement of justice in providing people with power, capacity, and opportunity. In their words, “personal, relational, and collective wellness can be neither studied nor pursued in isolation from each other” (Prilleltensky et al., 2007, p. 39; see also Piran, 2001). This non-specific vulnerability-stressor model (Levine & Smolak, 2006) is consistent with the specific contentions of experts that the intersecting roles of gender inequality, sexual objectification, weight-based prejudice, race, and ethnicity make social justice a fundamental issue in “overcoming” ED (Levine, 1994; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Maine, 2000; Piran, 2001; Smolak & Murnen, 2004, 2007; Steiner-Adair, 1994). If, as the evidence demonstrates, various aspects of culture constitute risk for the development and maintenance of DE, then the “object” and “subject” of therapy is simultaneously the client with an ED and the culture (Maine, 2000; Steiner-Adair, 1994). “The challenge of therapy is to transform what appears as psychological resistance (a reluctance to know what one knows) to a political resistance (a refusal not to know what one knows)” (Steiner-Adair, 1994, p. 382). This transformation requires the aforementioned six C’s, including courage and commitment modeled by a therapist who actively takes a stance against long-standing, powerful cultural beliefs and practices while reclaiming the power of what a “model” can and should be. To be precise, then, media advocacy involves using the principles and forms of mass media in order to promote and market positive social changes (Wallack, Dorfman, Jernigan & Themba, 1993). We will get at the roots of the problem and sow the seeds of real, positive transformations only by becoming active advocates for change in the ways that mental health professionals think about mass media, for changes in the media themselves, and for collaboration with mass media to bring about other important changes in institutions, public policies, and cultural practices. Transforming mass media is daunting, but definitely possible, perhaps to an extent that even many professionals would find surprising (Kelly, 2002; Levine & Kelly, in press; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Maine, 2000; Maine & Kelly, 2005).

A FINAL REFLECTION AS AN EXAMPLE OF ADVOCACY “Media” is one of those important concepts whose very ubiquity and familiarity constitute a formidable barrier to grasping its effects on people’s lives and its implications for effective, humane clinical practice. The evidence in favor of the proposition that mass media are a causal risk factor for ED is solid but incomplete. Still, the evidence in favor of that proposition is much stronger than the current evidence for the theoretical and dogmatic contention that “eating disorders are genetic” (Smolak et al., 2006).


64


The mass media have had an impact on bodies, BI, gender identity, and eating for at least 125 years (Banner, 1983; Silverstein & Perlick, 1995), but the intersection(s) and transactions between individuals, family, and communities today are quite different than in the past. What constitutes “community” today is a culture increasingly saturated with instantaneous electronic connections and with extremely well-financed, extremely clever, profit-imperative marketing (Levine & Kelly, in press). Thus, it is extremely important, in personal, professional, and political terms, for clinicians to develop and keep current their media literacy. Clinicians need to marshal the six Cs of their own lives to understand how the immense, powerful, and continually evolving sociocultural “factor” called “mass media” works. And clinicians need to be a “Bolder Model” in challenging the medias’ harmful effects by proactively expressing and asserting ourselves in, through, and with the media themselves. Media literacy is a promising area for prevention precisely because, whether target audiences are ED experts or 4th-grade boys and girls, it has the potential to foster and reinforce potent forms of consciousness-raising, connections, competence-building, choice, and cultural change (Levine, 2009a; Levine & Piran, 2004; Levine & Smolak, 2006; Piran, 2001).

References Albee, G. W. (1983). Psychopathology, prevention, and the just society. Journal of Primary Prevention, 4, 5e40. Aldarondo, E. (Ed.), (2007). Advancing social justice through clinical practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Rev.; DSMIV-TR). Washington, DC: Author. Anderson-Fye, E. P., & Becker, A. E. (2004). Sociocultural aspects of eating disorders. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 565e589). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Austin, S. B. (2001). Population-based prevention of eating disorders: An application of the Rose prevention model. Preventive Medicine, 32, 268e283. Banner, L. W. (1983). American beauty. New York, NY: Knopf. Bardone-Cone, A. M., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? Experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 537e548. Barlett, C. P., & Harris, R. J. (2008). The impact of body emphasizing video games on body image concerns in men and women. Sex Roles, 59, 586e601. Becker, A. E., & Fay, K. (2006). Sociocultural issues and eating disorders. In S. Wonderlich, J. E. Mitchell, M. de Zwaan, & H. Steiger (Eds.), Annual review of eating disorders: Part 2 (pp. 35e63). Oxon, UK: Radcliffe Publishing. Botvin, G. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887e897. Brown, L. S. (1997). The private practice of subversion: Psychology as Tikkun Olam. American Psychologist, 52, 449e462. Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis. Bulik, C. (2004). Genetic and biological risk factors. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 3e16). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Cafri, G., Yamamiya, Y., Brannick, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 421e433. Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (2007). Media and the American child. Burlington, MA: Academic Press. Crisafulli, M. A., Von Holle, A., & Bulik, C. M. (2008). Attitudes toward anorexia nervosa: The impact of framing on blame and stigma. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 333e339. Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Stirling, E. (2009). Understanding the impact of thin media models on women’s bodyfocused affect: The roles of thin-deal internalization and weight-related self-discrepancy activation in experimental exposure effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 43e72.



65

Dohnt, H., & Tiggemann, M. (2006). The contribution of peer and media influences to the development of body satisfaction and self-esteem in young girls: A prospective study. Developmental Psychology, 42, 929e936. Gordon, R. A. (2000). Eating disorders: Anatomy of a social epidemic (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A metaanalysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460e476. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1e16. Haines, J., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Morris, B. (2008). Theater as a behavior change strategy: Qualitative findings from a school-based intervention. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 16, 241e254. Hargreaves, D., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Longer-term implications of responsiveness to thin-ideal television: Support for a cumulative hypothesis of body image disturbance? European Eating Disorders Review, 11, 465e477. Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2006). Media exposure, current and future body ideals, and disordered eating among preadolescent girls: A longitudinal panel study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 153e163. Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2008). Media, body image, and eating disorders. In S. L. Calvert, & B. J. Wilson (Eds.), The handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 381e406). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Himes, S. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2007). Fat stigmatization in television shows and movies: A content analysis. Obesity, 15, 712e718. Hobbs, R. (1998, Winter). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 16e32. Irving, L. (1999). A bolder model of prevention: Science, practice, and activism. In N. Piran, M. P. Levine, & C. Steiner-Adair (Eds.), Preventing eating disorders: A handbook of interventions and special challenges (pp. 63e83). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel. Kelly, J. (2002). Dads and daughters: How to inspire, understand, and support your daughter. New York, NY: Broadway Books. Klump, K., Bullik, C. M., Kaye, W. H., Treasure, J., & Tyson, E. (2009). Academy for eating disorders position paper: Eating disorders are serious mental illnesses. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 97e103. Levine, M. P. (1994). “Beauty Myth” and the Beast: What men can do and be to help prevent eating disorders. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 2, 101e113. Levine, M. P. (2006). Prevention is a necessity, not a luxury: Part 2: In search of a bolder modeldWhat we can do and be in our everyday lives in order to prevent negative body image and disordered eating. June, OUR Journey [a publication of The Bronte Foundation, Melbourne, Australia], 3(1), 1, 4e12. Available by request from [email protected] Levine, M. P. (2009a). Aportaciones desde el campo del la prevencioń: Implicaciones para la educacioń en comunicioń [Lessons from the field of prevention: Implications for Media Literacy Programs]. Aula de Innovacioń Educativa [Educational Innovations for the Classroom], 178, 14e18. Levine, M. P. (2009b). Are media an important medium for clinicians? Mass media, eating disorders, and the Bolder Model of treatment, prevention, and advocacy. April 18, Presentation at the conference “Eating Disorders: State of the Art Treatment Symposium,” sponsored by The Center for Eating Disorders at Sheppard Pratt, Towson, MD. (Available by request, from [email protected]) Levine, M. P., & Harrison, K. (2004). The role of mass media in the perpetuation and prevention of negative body image and disordered eating. In J. Kevin Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders & obesity (pp. 695e717). New York, NY: John Wiley. Levine, M. P., & Harrison, K. (2009). Effects of media on eating disorders and body image. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed.) (pp. 490e515). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Levine, M. P., & Kelly, J. (in press). A primer on media literacy’s role in prevention of negative body image and disordered eating. In G. McVey et al. (Eds.), Improving the prevention of eating-related disorders: Collaborative research, advocacy, and policy change. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Wilfred Laurier University Press. Levine, M.P., & McVey, G. (in press). The community-based prevention of negative body image and disordered eating: A framework for programs, research, and advocacy. In G. McVey et al. (Eds.), Improving the prevention of eating-related disorders: collaborative research, advocacy, and policy change. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Wilfred Laurier University Press. Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2009). Everybody knows that mass media are/are not a cause of eating disorders: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 29, 9e42.


66


Levine, M. P., & Piran, N. (2004). The role of body image in the prevention of eating disorders. Body Image, 1, 57e70. Levine, M. P., & Smolak, L. (2006). The prevention of eating problems and eating disorders: Theory, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Levine, M. P., & Smolak, L. (2008). “What exactly are we waiting for?” The case for universal-selective eating disorders prevention programs. International Journal of Child & Adolescent Health, 1, 295e304. Levine, M. P., & Smolak, L. (2009). Prevention of negative body image and disordered eating in children and adolescents: Recent developments and promising directions. In L. Smolak, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth (2nd ed.) (pp. 215e239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Maine, M. (2000). Body wars: Making peace with women’s bodies. An activist’s guide. Carlsbad, CA: Gu¨rze Books. Maine, M. (2004). Father hunger: Fathers, daughters, and the pursuit of thinness (2nd ed.). Carlsbad, CA: Gu¨rze Books. Maine, M., Davis, W. N., & Shure, J. (Eds.), (2009). Effective clinical practice in the treatment of eating disorders: The heart of the matter. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge. Maine, M., & Kelly, J. (2005). The body myth: Adult women and the pressure to be perfect. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. May, R. (1958). To be and not to be: Contributions of existential psychotherapy. In R. May, E. Angel, & H. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 59e74). New York, NY: Basic Books. McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, B. T. (2007). Grounding clinical training and supervision in an empowerment model. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 417e442). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Murnen, S. K., Levine, M. P., Groesz, L., & Smith, J. (2007, August). Do fashion magazines promote body dissatisfaction in girls and women? A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the 115th meeting of the American Psychology Association, San Francisco, CA. Myers, T. A., & Crowther, J. H. (2007). Sociocultural pressures, thin-ideal internalization, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction. Could feminist beliefs be a moderating factor? Body Image, 4, 296e308. Piran, N. (2001). Re-inhabiting the body from the inside out: Girls transform their school environment. In D. L. Tolman, & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 218e238). New York, NY: NYU Press. Pope, H. G., Jr., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2000). The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York, NY: The Free Press. Prilleltensky, I., Dokecki, P., Frieden, G., & Wang, V. O. (2007). Counseling for wellness and justice: Foundations and ethical dilemmas. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 19e42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Puhl, R. M., & Latner, J. D. (2007). Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 557e580. Ricciardelli, L. A., McCabe, M. P., Williams, R. J., & Thompson, J. K. (2007). The role of ethnicity and culture in body image and disordered eating among males. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 582e606. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8e18 year-olds. A Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Study. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/7251.cfm Silverstein, B., & Perlick, D. (1995). The cost of competence: Why inequality causes depression, eating disorders, and illness in women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Smolak, L. (2009). Risk factors in the development of body image, eating problems, and obesity. In L. Smolak, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth: Assessment, prevention, and treatment (2nd ed.) (pp. 135e155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Smolak, L., & Levine, M. P. (1994). Critical issues in the developmental psychopathology of eating disorders. In L. Alexander, & B. Lumsden (Eds.), Understanding eating disorders (pp. 37e60). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. Smolak, L., & Levine, M. P. (1996). Adolescents’ transitions and the development of eating problems. In L. Smolak, M. P. Levine, & R. Striegel-Moore (Eds.), The psychopathology of eating disorders: Implications for research, prevention, and treatment (pp. 207e234). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Smolak, L., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2006, June). The scientific status of sociocultural models for eating disorders: A close look at controversy, theory and data. Workshop presented at the International Conference on Eating Disorders of the Academy for Eating Disorders, Barcelona, Spain. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2004). A feminist approach to eating disorders. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 590e605). New York, NY: Wiley.



67

Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2007). Feminism and body image. In V. Swami, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The body beautiful: Evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 236e258). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Steiner-Adair, C. (1994). The politics of prevention. In P. Fallon, M. A. Katzman, & S. C. Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 381e394). New York, NY: Guilford. Stice, E. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825e848. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Internalization of the thin-ideal: Mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 181e183. Thompson, J. K., van den Berg, P., Roehrig, M., Guarda, A. S., & Heinberg, L. J. (2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 293e304. Tiggemann, M. (2006). The role of media exposure in adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness: Prospective results. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 523e541. Trampe, D., Stapel, D. A., & Siero, F. W. (2007). On models and vases: Body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 106e118. Van den Berg, P., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Hannan, P. J., & Haines, J. (2007). Is dieting advice from magazines helpful or harmful? Five-year associations with weight-control behaviors and psychological outcomes in adolescents. Pediatrics, 119, 30e37. Vera, E. M., & Speight, S. L. (2007). Advocacy, outreach, and prevention: Integrating social action roles in professional training. In E. Aldarondo (Ed.), Advancing social justice through clinical practice (pp. 373e389). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Themba, M. (1993). Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.


C H A P T E R

5 The Assessment Process Refining the Clinical Evaluation of Patients with Eating Disorders Drew A. Anderson, Jason M. Lavender, and Kyle P. De Young Assessment is an often-overlooked but essential component of the treatment process. While assessments can be conducted for many reasons, this chapter will focus on assessments of clinical eating disorders (ED) conducted for the purpose of treatment planning and outcome. To assist treatment planning, developing a symptom profile is often more important than obtaining a diagnosis per se. While treatments do exist for particular ED diagnoses (e.g., Fairburn, 1997; Fairburn, Marcus & Wilson, 1993; Lock, Le Grange, Agras & Dare, 2002), more recent research suggests that effective treatment can be conducted without a specific ED diagnosis, utilizing a transdiagnostic approach (Fairburn, 2008). Furthermore, the diagnostic criteria found in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSMIV-TR) (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) have been critiqued on a number of grounds (Fairburn & Cooper, 2007; Walsh, 2009a, b; Wonderlich, Crosby, Mitchell & Engel, 2007). Of particular relevance for clinical practice is the finding that the diagnosis of Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) is at least as common as, if not more common than, anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in clinical settings (Dalle Grave & Calugi, 2007; Machado, Machado, Goncalves & Hoek, 2007; Rockert, Kaplan & Olmsted, 2007; Turner & Bryant-Waugh, 2004). While the development of the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) is underway, with an expected release in 2012, the resolution of these issues is unclear. Thus, this chapter will describe an assessment process that focuses on evaluating key symptoms rather than generating a specific diagnosis.

WEIGHT, MENSTRUATION, AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONS Weight Status Weight status is a key sign differentiating ED. In the current DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) it represents the prime diagnostic difference between AN


71


72

5. THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS

and BN. Weight status in ED can range from significantly underweight to obese. Weight itself, however, is not a behavior, but is the consequence of an interaction between behavior, the environment, and genetics. A patient’s weight also has important treatment implications. Due to serious medical consequences associated with being severely underweight (Keel et al., 2003; Mitchell, Pomeroy & Adson, 1997), weight regain is commonly the most pressing issue in treatment for underweight individuals (Fairburn, 2008). For non-overweight individuals, the goal is usually to stabilize weight and prevent any major weight fluctuations. For overweight and obese individuals, the role of weight change as a treatment goal is controversial. Some suggest that weight loss should not be encouraged because it promotes the very concerns that may drive individuals to develop ED (e.g., Bacon, 2008), while others suggest that weight loss may be appropriate in some cases (Wilfley, 2002). Additionally, a comprehensive assessment of weight status provides a wealth of clinical data, offering an opportunity to learn how individuals view their weight and how they react to being weighed. For example, asking when, where, and how often they weigh themselves, how they would feel if they were asked to weigh themselves only once per week (as in the Eating Disorder Examination; Fairburn, Cooper & O’Connor, 2008), and whether they engage in any rituals associated with weighing reveals useful information about the relative importance of weight in their life.

Obtaining Current Weight Obtaining an accurate weight is sometimes a sensitive topic for both patients and treatment providers. Directly weighing the client is the most accurate way to measure a patient’s weight. An accurate weight is particularly important when a patient’s weight is low and its restoration is a focus of treatment or when there are medical concerns related to low weight. A study by Kaplan et al. (2009) found that even a small weight loss following intensive treatment for AN was a powerful predictor of relapse, highlighting the need for frequent and accurate monitoring of weight in these cases. Many patients experience substantial distress at the mention that they will be weighed, and the professional can take steps to alleviate this distress. For example, suggesting “blind” weight (i.e., with the patient’s back to the scale or the numbers covered) alleviates discomfort for some, although it increases it for others. It may be clinically useful to have patients see the weight, however, even if it causes some discomfort. It is also an opportunity for clinicians to improve therapeutic relationships by demonstrating their sensitivity to how difficult this topic can be for individuals with ED. Unfortunately, it may become a point of disagreement between patient and clinician who do not see eye-to-eye regarding the benefits of obtaining detailed information pertaining to body weight. Underweight ED patients may attempt to “add weight” by wearing multiple layers of clothes, placing heavy objects in pockets, etc. when being weighed. For that reason, many professionals prefer to weigh patients in minimal clothing (e.g., a hospital gown) to minimize this possibility. Excessive fluid-intake is also common and clinicians need to decide how to best approach these issues at assessment and throughout treatment, perhaps through monitoring before weighing or even testing of urine specific gravity.

II. BRIDGING THE GAP: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

WEIGHT-RELATED PHYSIOLOGICAL MARKERS

73

Patients may also be asked their weight. The response often conveys much more than a number. Clients who respond without pause with an exact number may reveal the regularity of their weigh-ins and the importance they place on weight. Conversely, some may respond by claiming that they do not know their weight or by offering a rough estimate. These responses may indicate an avoidance of knowledge and stimuli pertaining to weight, perhaps because these stimuli are so distressing. Reluctance to report weight may also reflect resistance or ambivalence to the assessment process or even shame. Although self-reported and measured weight are highly correlated, research indicates a tendency for individuals with a high weight to underestimate and for those with a low weight to overestimate, leading to systematic bias in self-reported weight at the extremes (Shapiro & Anderson, 2003; Villanueva, 2001).

Obtaining a Weight History Obtaining a weight history from medical records can overcome the inherent limitations of memory, but records often have missing data. Some key pieces of information to be garnered from a weight history include the individual’s highest weight, lowest weight, any significant weight gains or losses, and the ages during which these occurred. Developing a timeline, beginning in childhood and continuing to the present time, will help the clinician and patient to construct a model of the course of the ED over time. With younger patients, review of their pediatric growth charts can be especially helpful. Research provides support for the prognostic value of obtaining an accurate weight history. In BN, weight suppression, or the extent to which current weight is below one’s highest weight, has been found to predict subsequent weight gain as well as drop-out and poor treatment outcome (Butryn, Lowe, Safer & Agras, 2006; Lowe, Davis, Lucks, Annunziato & Butryn, 2006). Also, a history of AN in women with a diagnosis of BN has been shown to predict a longer course of illness and a higher probability of relapsing into AN compared to women without a history of AN (Eddy et al., 2007).

WEIGHT-RELATED PHYSIOLOGICAL MARKERS Menstruation While amenorrhea is currently one of the diagnostic criteria for AN in post-menarchial females (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), it does not appear to improve the specificity of the diagnosis (Mitchell, Cook-Myers & Wonderlich, 2005), and some have suggested that it be removed as a core diagnostic criterion (Attia & Roberto, 2009). Many women with very low body weight experience irregular menstruation (oligomenorrhea) rather than amenorrhea (Poyastro Pinheiro et al., 2007), while women who do not have very low weights may lose their menses due to strenuous physical activity (Glass et al., 1987). Also, the criterion is obviously irrelevant in certain subgroups (e.g., males and prepubescent and post-menopausal females). Although the diagnostic utility of amenorrhea has been called into question, it remains an important indicator of the severity of low weight. Amenorrhea is associated with a number of other important physiological markers (Attia & Roberto, 2009). It has also been associated with self-induced vomiting in normal weight adolescent females (Austin et al., 2008),


74


suggesting that it may be indicative of more than simply low body weight. Besides noting the presence or absence of menstrual regularity, additional questions can provide a clearer picture of hormonal status. For example, noting whether individuals have maintained a regular menstrual cycle since puberty may inform the clinical course of their ED. Importantly, the use of birth control pills and other hormonal supplements to stimulate or stabilize the menstrual cycle may mask underlying endocrine abnormalities. Finally, when menstrual irregularities have been present, assessing the individual’s perception of their severity and implications can be useful.

Other Physical Conditions Eating disorder patients often experience a host of related medical problems, some of them serious (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; Mitchell et al., 1997). Beyond the information obtained from medical records, a thorough evaluation by an experienced medical professional, throughout treatment, is strongly recommended (Carney & Andersen, 1996; Crow & Swigart, 2005; Work Group on Eating Disorders, 2006). Clinicians without medical training should be familiar with the basics of the medical issues commonly associated with ED. Self report is also a source of data regarding the presence and severity of physical problems. For instance, individuals who abuse laxatives over extended periods of time may become dependent upon them to stimulate bowel movements (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Thus, what may have begun as a method of purging can evolve into a method of self-medicating constipation. This and similar contextual information may not find its way into medical records but can be particularly informative during the treatment process.

DIETARY RESTRICTION AND DIETARY RESTRAINT Dietary restriction refers to limiting the overall amount of food eaten, what foods are eaten, or both, while dietary restraint is the intention to restrict food intake, whether or not it is successful (Williamson et al., 2007). At initial assessment as well as throughout treatment, a thorough review of both actual and intentional daily eating patterns is necessary, including what meals, snacks, amounts, and types of food individuals typically eat and when. This information is extremely useful in treatment planning and progress-tracking, as dietary restriction may lead to weight loss but may also precede binge eating.

Assessing Quantity Of Meals And Snacks The amount of food eaten (outside of objective binge episodes, when present) can vary substantially between and within different types of ED. Since many ED treatments (e.g., CBT, Fairburn, 2008; and Maudsley family therapy, Lock et al., 2002) involve establishing a regular meal pattern, an accurate initial assessment of current intake is essential. Asking how often patients eat breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks gives a good indication of overall patterns. They should also be asked whether they have any rules about the overall amount of food they eat, such as calorie limits, or rules about when they will eat, such as not eating after 8:00 p.m.


BINGE EATING

75

Arriving at an estimate of daily caloric intake involves a detailed assessment of consumption over a typical day, although many have difficulty reporting what constitutes a “typical” day. Most individuals make large errors in estimating food intake (Trabulsi & Schoeller, 2001), however, and individuals with higher levels of dietary restraint and eating-related pathology tend to be even less accurate (Bathalon et al., 2000; Hadigan, LaChaussee, Walsh & Kissileff, 1992). Thus, although many ED patients regularly track their caloric consumption closely, their estimates should not be assumed to be accurate. Even so, obtaining an approximate daily caloric intake is often helpful in estimating the trajectory of weight loss or gain and the degree of dietary restriction.

Assessing Diversity of Foods Eaten In addition to attempts at limiting the overall quantity of food they eat, individuals suffering from ED often attempt to limit the types of food they eat, dividing food types into “good” and “bad” based upon their caloric value, fat or sugar (carbohydrate) content, or their propensity to trigger binges. Rules may include firm, inflexible statements, such as “no fried foods,” in contrast to more flexible guidelines. Importantly, clinicians should pay attention to whether the rules are aimed at influencing weight or shape rather than being part of a well-balanced nutritional intake. Similarly, clinicians should exercise care when patients practice vegetarianism or veganism. As with fasting, people may choose these restricted dietary regimens for various reasons. If the motivation includes influencing body shape or weight, the dietary restriction is notable, but clinicians should avoid passing judgment about individuals’ moral or health motives. Although some research has indicated that vegetarianism is associated with disordered eating (DE) (Robinson-O’Brien, Perry, Wall, Story & Neumark-Sztainer, 2009), this finding is not universal (Fisak, Peterson, Tantleff-Dunn & Molnar, 2006).

BINGE EATING Although binge eating is a core feature of BN and binge eating disorder (BED), it is also common among individuals with AN, EDNOS, and other subclinical ED presentations (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Binge eating is particularly difficult to assess, in part due to the complex and controversial nature of the definition of a binge. First, to be defined as a binge episode using the current DSM-IV-TR criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), the individual must consume an unusually large amount of food in a discrete period of time and experience a sense of loss of control. However, many individuals who engage in binge eating do not describe it this way, which will be discussed later in this chapter. Also, occasional binge episodes are common in some cultures (Johnson, Schlundt, Barclay, Carr-Nangle & Engler, 1995), thus binge episodes alone do not necessarily reflect clinically significant eating problems. Because the definition of a binge episode remains problematic, a thorough assessment of the specific components and characteristics of a given eating episode is suggested.

Loss of Control A subjective sense of having lost control over one’s eating is perhaps the most salient defining feature of an episode of binge eating (Wolfe, Baker, Smith & Kelly-Weeder, 2009).


76


This loss of control may manifest in one or more ways. An individual may report feeling unable to stop eating once the binge commenced or unable to resist the urge to start binge eating. Also, some ED patients engage in planned binge eating episodes, which they may deny are “out of control.” In such circumstances, the clinician can ask additional questions (e.g., could they have chosen not to engage in the episode?) in order to clarify the extent of loss of control.

Amount of Food The size or amount of food consumed is a controversial component of the current definition of an eating binge. The DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) does not specify an amount that must be consumed to qualify as a binge and some have argued that this requirement be modified or eliminated (Wolfe et al., 2009). Importantly, a substantial proportion of individuals with ED consider eating episodes to be binges even when the amount consumed is not objectively large (Beglin & Fairburn, 1992; Johnson, Boutelle, Torgrud, Davig & Turner, 2000; Telch, Pratt & Niego, 1998). Furthermore, individuals who experience loss of control during “binge” episodes that are not objectively large have similar levels of both ED psychopathology and general psychopathology (Keel, Mayer & Harnden-Fischer, 2001; Latner, Hildebrandt, Rosewall, Chisholm & Hayashi, 2007) as those individuals whose binge episodes are objectively large. Still, obtaining information on the size of typical binge episodes is useful. For example, treatment strategies may differ substantially for an individual whose “binge episodes” consist of several thousand calories consumed over the course of two hours compared to an individual who consumes only a few hundred calories in a few minutes.

“Grazing” Behavior Another eating pattern associated with ED is “grazing,” a pattern characterized by frequently eating smaller amounts of food, with little time between episodes, over a longer period of time (e.g., throughout the course of a day). The individual may consume a large amount of food and experience a subjective sense of having lost control, making it difficult to distinguish these episodes from more traditional binge episodes. Because individuals may experience both traditional binge episodes and grazing behavior, assessing for both patterns is essential for designing an appropriate treatment plan.

INAPPROPRIATE COMPENSATORY BEHAVIORS Individuals with ED can engage in both purging and non-purging methods of inappropriate compensatory behaviors (ICB). Common methods of purging are self-induced vomiting, laxative misuse, diuretic misuse, and enemas, while common non-purging methods include fasting, excessive exercise, and the misuse of insulin and thyroid medications (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Assessment of ICB should include information about the variety of methods, their frequency, the situations in which they are employed, and their apparent functions. Although some ICB are rather straightforward (e.g., selfinduced vomiting), considerable confusion exists regarding what other behaviors qualify


INAPPROPRIATE COMPENSATORY BEHAVIORS

77

as inappropriate, and many contextual variables must be taken into consideration. For instance, taking a leisurely walk after a large meal may be undertaken in part as a compensatory behavior but is unlikely to be considered inappropriate, as moderate levels of physical activity are health-promoting (Haskell et al., 2007). Exercising for several hours after an eating episode is much more likely to be viewed as inappropriate, even though exercise bouts lasting several hours are common in some sports. Although ICB may be present in AN, the diagnosis of BN and BED specifically rely upon the assessor’s judgment regarding whether the ED is characterized by the regular use of ICB. This determination is important for making a differential diagnosis between BN and BED as well as for capturing the severity of these behaviors. Due to marked symptom frequency fluctuation that may occur in BN, considering the average frequency of ICB when making this diagnosis is extremely important; individuals can have “good” weeks during which they experience few or no episodes of ICB and “bad” weeks during which such behaviors are present nearly every day.

Self-Induced Vomiting Self-induced vomiting is the most common form of purging in both outpatient ED (Favaro & Santonastaso, 1996) and community samples (Mond, Hay, Rodgers, Owen & Mitchell, 2006). Feelings of shame and embarrassment often accompany the disclosure of this behavior, so clinicians need to be sensitive when assessing a patient’s experience with vomiting. Assessing the frequency of self-induced vomiting is particularly tricky, depending upon the pattern of this behavior. For instance, some individuals induce vomiting once per day. Others induce vomiting after every binge eating episode they experience or even after regular meals or snacks. Thus, one should never assume that self-induced vomiting only follows episodes of binge eating. Assessing the method by which individuals achieve vomiting is often useful. Some patients ingest syrup of ipecac or salt water to induce nausea and to facilitate vomiting. Since the use of syrup of ipecac has been linked to serious cardiac problems (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), it is important to note the use of this substance. Most often, however, individuals manually stimulate the gag reflex by inserting a foreign object (e.g., finger, eating utensil, or toothbrush) into their throats, increasing the risk of esophageal tears, accidental ingestion of the foreign body, and desensitization of the gag reflex (Mendell & Logemann, 2001). Over time, individuals may be able to induce vomiting with little or no manual stimulation, and may not report that they “induce” vomiting. Nevertheless, it should be considered an ICB.

Laxatives, Diuretics, and Enemas The assessment of laxative, diuretic, and enema misuse should consider whether or not these behaviors are used to compensate for eating. Thus, if the only reason for laxative use is to relieve constipation and the recommended dosage instructions are followed, this should not be considered misuse. Noting the presence of tolerance to these substances aids treatment planning. Individuals who have not developed a tolerance may cease laxative use all at once, while those who have developed a tolerance may need to be weaned from their use. Diuretic use presents additional complications for assessment including whether substances are used specifically for their diuretic effects and under what circumstances their use is


78


appropriate. For instance, some “cleansing” routines and extreme diets include ingesting teas with diuretic properties. Also, some pharmacological agents, prescription and non-prescription, act as diuretics. One should exercise clinical judgment regarding whether the use of such substances should be considered ICB; the user’s intent will be the prime determinant.

Fasting Fasting as an ICB involves not eating food for extended periods of time due to body shape or weight concerns. Fasting may be a better predictor of future eating pathology than overall dietary restraint (Stice, Davis, Miller & Marti, 2008), underscoring the importance of assessing this behavior. Eight consecutive waking hours is probably the lower boundary for considering a period of time without eating as a fast (Fairburn, 2008). During this time, individuals may drink fluids without breaking the fast, but if they have eaten very small amounts of food, their behavior is better considered to be restriction. The motivation behind fasting is important, but it is not uncommon to experience resistance when assessing this. Alternative explanations commonly include fasting for religious reasons, fasting for medical reasons, forgetting to eat, not having access to food, not having time to eat, and not feeling hungry. We will comment briefly on each. Periodic fasting plays an important role in many religious and spiritual traditions, and it is important to avoid pathologizing religious fasting. If individuals indicate that part of the reason they fasted was to affect their weight or shape, however, the fast might be considered an ICB. Fasting for medical reasons has gained interest based on research which suggests that regular fasting can have health benefits even in the absence of weight loss, although this has not yet been firmly established in humans (Mattson & Wan, 2005; Varady & Hellerstein, 2007). As with religious fasting, if manipulating weight and shape underlies health-based fasting, it may be considered inappropriate. When individuals claim a lack of time to eat or access to food, the clinician should determine whether these were isolated, unpredictable instances. Predictable situations should not excuse fasting behavior. Finally, reports of frequently “not being hungry” or “forgetting to eat” should be viewed with some skepticism. Hunger generally returns within 3e4 waking hours after eating (e.g., Driver, 1988; Poortvliet et al., 2007), barring illness or other psychiatric disorders such as major depressive episode (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). A substantial proportion of ED patients do have co-occurring mood or anxiety disorders, which can make it difficult to determine the true reasons behind episodes of non-eating. Given the pathology of EDs, however, reports of frequent periods of fasting because of loss of hunger are suspect.

Exercise The DSM describes exercise as excessive “when it significantly interferes with important activities, when it occurs at inappropriate times or in inappropriate settings, or when the individual continues to exercise despite injury or other medical complications” (American Psychiatric Association, 2000, pp. 590e591). Thus, to avoid pathologizing a behavior that is considered health-promoting for most individuals, the DSM suggests that exercise must be associated with impairment in functioning or increased risk of physical injury to be considered excessive. Because this criterion is vague, there is disagreement regarding how best to define


BODY IMAGE AND SELF-EVALUATION

79

and assess excessive exercise. Researchers have defined excessive exercise according to exercise type, number of days spent exercising, and/or the amount of time spent exercising per occasion (Davis, Fox, Brewer & Ratusny, 1995), the intensity of the exercise (Fairburn et al., 2008), whether the exercise is obligatory or compulsive in nature (Adkins & Keel, 2005; Pasman & Thompson, 1988), or the function of the exercise (De Young & Anderson, 2010). It is important to determine whether individuals regularly exercise rather than engaging in other valued life activities. Frequently, however, patients report that exercise or sport competition is in itself a highly valued and important activity, complicating the clinical picture. Asking about any injuries that have been sustained while exercising and how the individual responded to these injuries can clarify this issue. If a medical professional was consulted as a result of an injury and the professional’s recommendations were not followed, the exercise is more likely excessive. Additionally, asking whether friends or family have ever commented that they spend too much time exercising can be informative. Exercising in excess of one’s sport-related practice time can also be an indicator of excessive exercise. Strong feelings of fear or anxiety related to missing practice or an exercise session can also suggest excessive exercise. Finally, asking directly whether the exercise is being used as a compensatory method or not can be useful. Ultimately, clinical judgment should be used to determine whether exercise behavior is related to the ED. Clinicians must work to achieve a balance between discouraging ICB and encouraging health-promoting behaviors and adaptive coping strategies, while taking into consideration contra-indications for exercise such as emaciation and cardiac compromise. Excessive exercise following treatment has been shown to be a predictor of relapse in AN (Carter, Blackmore, Sutandar-Pinnock & Woodside, 2004), so achieving this balance is especially difficult.

Inappropriate Use of Medications Occasionally, ED patients misuse medications (other than laxative, diuretic, and diet pill medications) for the purposes of influencing their shape or weight. These medications most commonly include insulin and thyroid medications. Thus, individuals who have insulindependent diabetes mellitus (i.e., type 1 diabetes) should be asked whether they follow their physician’s recommendations regarding the administration of insulin, as this governs the metabolism of ingested sugars. Not doing so can be extremely dangerous (Rodin, 2002). Similarly, individuals with hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism may either omit or overuse their medication, respectively. These behaviors are also extremely dangerous. Thus, a careful assessment of medical conditions and associated medication use is highly recommended.

BODY IMAGE AND SELF-EVALUATION Body image (BI) is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct including cognitive, behavioral, and affective elements (Cash, 2004). BI disturbance is a core feature of ED, though its exact nature varies. BI assessments may address attitudinal (dissatisfaction with body weight or specific body areas) and/or perceptual (body size misperceptions) components (Cash & Deagle, 1997).


80


Attitudinal Body Image ED sufferers usually have disturbances in attitudinal BI, including body dissatisfaction, fear of weight gain or becoming fat, and undue influence of BI on self-evaluation. Body dissatisfaction refers to the degree to which one dislikes one’s body; assessments can address global elements (i.e., overall weight and shape satisfaction) and specific elements (i.e., satisfaction with particular body areas such as hips, abdomen, and arms). Determining the intensity of fear of gaining weight or becoming fat is also important, particularly if this fear drives extreme dietary restriction and inappropriate compensatory behaviors. Finally, for many with ED, BI plays a substantial role in overall self-evaluation. To assess this, clinicians may ask patients to rank order factors that contribute to their self-evaluation. ED patients often exhibit preoccupations and behaviors associated with BI disturbance. They may frequently check themselves by measuring or scrutinizing a particular body part of concern. Other behaviors include camouflaging (e.g., concealing one’s body) and avoidance of looking at one’s body in the mirror or of situations in which one’s body would be exposed (e.g., the beach). The frequency, severity, and associated psychosocial impairment of these behaviors vary widely, so the use of open-ended questions is especially important.

Perceptual Body Image ED sufferers commonly experience distortions in body perception, frequently characterized by an overestimation of body shape and size. Assessing disturbance in perceptual BI is difficult due to the complex methodology and instrumentation required as well as the fact that it can fluctuate based on a number of factors (Garner, 2002; Gruber, Pope, Borowiecki & Cohane, 1999; Thompson & Gardner, 2002). Given these limitations, clinicians may opt to focus their assessment primarily on BI attitudes, particularly since attitudinal BI is more clinically relevant (Cash & Deagle, 1997).

COMORBID PSYCHOPATHOLOGY Many ED patients experience one or more forms of comorbid psychopathology, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope & Kessler, 2007). Given the high rates of comorbidity, assessing for the presence of other psychopathology is critical to treatment planning and case conceptualization.

Anxiety Disorders A variety of anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), frequently co-occur with ED (Godart, Flament, Perdereau & Jeammet, 2002; Hudson et al., 2007). When assessing for the presence of an anxiety disorder in an ED sufferer, consider symptom overlap. For example, if obsessions and compulsions are entirely associated with eating and BI (e.g., obsessions about calories or body checking), these symptoms should not be interpreted as evidence of OCD. To clarify this issue, clinicians can ask whether the patient experiences anxious thoughts or behaviors unrelated to eating and/or BI.


DENIAL AND MINIMIZATION

81

Although classified as a somatoform disorder, body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) shares characteristics of an anxiety disorder and may occur among ED patients. To distinguish between ED and BDD, clinicians should assess the individual’s primary areas of concern. In ED, the focus is on body weight and shape, while BDD concerns more often focus on specific body parts (Grant, Kim & Eckert, 2002; Phillips, Kim & Hudson, 1995).

Mood Disorders Mood disorders are commonly associated with ED. Assessing for comorbid depression is essential, given the rate of suicidal ideation and related behaviors among ED patients (Fischer & Le Grange, 2007; Lacey, 1993; Wildman, Lilenfeld & Marcus, 2004). If the individual reports any thoughts of suicide or death, the clinician should ask about history of suicidal behaviors, current motivation and intent, and the presence of a plan (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 1995). Patients may also report self-injurious behavior (e.g., cutting) without suicidal intent. If an individual reports such behaviors, assessing the frequency, severity, and potential lethality is critical. Assessments of comorbid depression should consider symptom overlap (e.g., weight change). If these symptoms seem primarily associated with the ED, they should not be considered to be symptoms of depression.

Substance Use Disorders Many ED patients exhibit alcohol and other substance abuse (Root et al., 2010; von Ranson, Iacono & McGue, 2002). The clinician should assess the frequency and average amount of substance use, as well as associated problematic and high-risk behaviors, as these influence treatment planning. Alcohol use disorders also appear to be a strong predictor of mortality among persons with AN (Keel et al., 2003). See Baker Dennis and Helfman (Chapter 14) for more information about ED and substance abuse.

DENIAL AND MINIMIZATION Given the social stigma associated with ED and the resulting embarrassment and shame, many sufferers deny or minimize the frequency or severity of their symptoms. Denial and minimization appear to be common in AN (Couturier & Lock, 2006; Vanderdeycken & Vanderlinden, 1983; Vitousek, Daly & Heiser, 1991), particularly denial of the seriousness of low body weight. Denial and minimization may also be manifested via under-reporting the frequency of certain ED behaviors. Vitousek and colleagues (1991) proposed three forms of denial: (i) deliberate distortion (i.e., intentionally underreporting or denying symptoms); (ii) inadvertent distortion (i.e., inaccurate reports resulting from a lack of awareness or insight); and (iii) overcompliance (i.e., the desire to please the clinician by providing inaccurate reports). Perceptions of anonymity and assessment conditions may also affect reporting (Keel, Crow, Davis & Mitchell, 2002; Lavender & Anderson, 2009). Although a clinician may never be entirely certain that an individual is providing honest reports, developing strong rapport is important and may increase an individual’s willingness to provide candid responses. A careful assessment can be part of the rapport-building


82


process. Many patients have never spoken to anyone about the realities of their ED, so the initial assessment is often a critical moment for developing connection, trust, a language for treatment, and a rationale for explaining the illness and treatment. Denial and minimization are often present when individuals feel ambivalent about, or do not see the need for, treatment. Instruments designed to assess readiness to change specifically in ED populations (Ackard, Croll, Richter, Adlis & Wonderlich, 2009; Geller, Cockell & Drab, 2001) can help the clinician explore this issue. In summary, while there are no easy solutions to these issues, clinicians should remain aware of the possibility of denial, minimization, and ambivalence in their patients and address them as indicated.

ADDITIONAL AREAS TO ASSESS Interpersonal and Family Functioning Many individuals with ED experience difficulties in interpersonal functioning, and these may play an important role in the etiology and maintenance of their psychopathology (McIntosh, Bulik, McKenzie, Luty & Jordan, 2000). One useful assessment model is based on the four interpersonal problem areas identified in Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) for ED: grief, role transitions, role disputes, and interpersonal deficits (Fairburn, 1997; Klerman & Weissman, 1993). It is also extremely important to assess family functioning and support (Work Group on Eating Disorders, 2006), particularly since some treatments include family involvement (Lock et al., 2002).

Trauma/Abuse History A history of trauma, particularly childhood sexual abuse, may be associated with developing an ED and even impulsive behaviors, including substance abuse and self-injury (Corstorphine, Waller, Lawson & Ganis, 2007; de Groot & Rodin, 1999; Smyth, Heron, Wonderlich, Crosby & Thompson, 2008; Wonderlich et al., 2001). If the assessment reveals a trauma history, the clinician should assess for dissociation and other symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and formulate the treatment plan accordingly (see Ackard and Brewerton, Chapter 15; and Briere & Scott, 2007, for a discussion of trauma assessment in ED populations).

BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER The domains discussed in this chapter represent the key components of a comprehensive ED assessment. Based on these domains, a clinician can build a symptom profile that allows for a more fine-grained analysis of change than can be provided by simply achieving a diagnosis. Such a profile can be mapped onto diagnostic systems such as the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), but the reliance on diagnosis comes with a number of shortcomings. A symptom profile approach avoids these shortcomings and provides a high level of clinical utility.


BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER

83

All of these key domains can be assessed using an informal semi-structured or unstructured interview. While using only interviews may be common clinical practice (Anderson & Paulosky, 2004a), we recommend that clinicians conduct more formal assessments by supplementing clinical interviews with well-validated self-report inventories. While it is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss specific instruments, several well-validated measures do exist, and comprehensive reviews of these measures are available (e.g., Allison, 2009; Anderson, Lundgren, Shapiro & Paulosky, 2004; Anderson & Paulosky, 2004b; Mitchell & Peterson, 2007). See also Chapter 15 (Ackard and Brewerton) and Chapter 27 (Banker and Klump). These measures have some advantages. First, they have well-established levels of reliability and validity. Second, most have norms, which allow the assessor to compare a given individual’s scores to others. Third, as noted previously, individuals with ED might reply more honestly when not communicating face-to-face (Keel et al., 2002; Lavender & Anderson, 2009). While most clinicians conduct a formal assessment at the beginning and ending of treatment (Anderson & Paulosky, 2004a), more frequent assessments provide valuable information about treatment progress and ultimate disposition. For example, early treatment response (after approximately 4 weeks of treatment) predicts longer-term treatment outcome (Doyle, Le Grange, Loeb, Doyle, & Crosby, in press; Grilo, Masheb & Wilson, 2006; Le Grange, Doyle, Crosby & Chen, 2008; Wilson, Fairburn, Agras, Walsh & Kraemer, 2002). Thus, an assessment at this point can assist clinicians in treatment planning. We suggest monthly formalized assessments, where feasible, to aid clinicians in tracking treatment. Weekly brief assessments using a brief paper and pencil instrument (e.g., the Eating Attitudes Test-26; Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982) can also be very helpful in tracking treatment progress. Assessment is a critical component of effective treatment. A good assessment can help determine an initial level of care, decisions about changes in level of care (Work Group on Eating Disorders, 2006), and the ultimate treatment outcome. This chapter will hopefully serve as a guide for conducting more efficient and effective assessments in clinical practice.

References Ackard, D. M., Croll, J. K., Richter, S., Adlis, S., & Wonderlich, A. (2009). A self-report instrument measuring readiness to change disordered eating behaviors: the Eating Disorders Stage of Change. Eating and Weight Disorders, 14, 66e76. Adkins, E. C., & Keel, P. K. (2005). Does "excessive" or "compulsive" best describe exercise as a symptom of bulimia nervosa? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 24e29. Allison, D. B. (2009). Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight-related problems (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author. Anderson, D. A., Lundgren, J. D., Shapiro, J. R., & Paulosky, C. A. (2004). Clinical assessment of eating disorders: Review and recommendations. Behavior Modification, 28, 763e782. Anderson, D. A., & Paulosky, C. A. (2004a). A survey of the use of assessment instruments by eating disorder professionals in clinical practice. Eating and Weight Disorders, 9, 238e241. Anderson, D. A., & Paulosky, C. A. (2004b). Psychological assessment of eating disorders and related features. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 112e129). New York, NY: Wiley. Attia, E., & Roberto, C. A. (2009). Should amenorrhea be a diagnostic criterion for anorexia nervosa? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 581e589.


84


Austin, S. B., Ziyadeh, N. J., Vohra, S., Forman, S., Gordon, C. M., & Prokop, L. A. (2008). Irregular menses linked to vomiting in a nonclinical sample: Findings from the National Eating Disorders Screening Program in high schools. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 450e457. Bacon, L. (2008). Health at every size: The surprising truth about your weight. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books, Inc. Bathalon, G. P., Tucker, K. L., Hays, N. P., Vinken, A. G., Greenberg, A. S., Mc Crory, M., & Roberts, S. B. (2000). Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of three common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71, 739e745. Beglin, S. J., & Fairburn, C. G. (1992). What is meant by the term "binge"? American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 123e124. Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2007). Assessment of trauma symptoms in eating-disordered populations. Eating Disorders, 15, 347e358. Butryn, M. L., Lowe, M. R., Safer, D. L., & Agras, W. S. (2006). Weight suppression is a robust predictor of outcome in the cognitive-behavioral treatment of bulimia nervosa. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 62e67. Carney, C. P., & Andersen, A. E. (1996). Eating disorders. Guide to medical evaluation and complications. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 19, 657e679. Carter, J. C., Blackmore, E., Sutandar-Pinnock, K., & Woodside, D. B. (2004). Relapse in anorexia nervosa: A survival analysis. Psychological Medicine, 34, 671e679. Cash, T. F. (2004). Body image: Past, present, and future. Body Image, 1, 1e5. Cash, T. F., & Deagle, E. A. (1997). The nature and extent of body-image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 107e125. Corstorphine, E., Waller, G., Lawson, R., & Ganis, C. (2007). Trauma and multi-impulsivity in the eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 8, 23e30. Couturier, J. L., & Lock, J. (2006). Denial and minimization in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39, 212e216. Crow, S., & Swigart, S. (2005). Medical assessment. In J. E. Mitchell & C. B. Peterson (Eds.), Assessment of eating disorders (pp. 120e128). New York, NY: Guilford. Dalle Grave, R., & Calugi, S. (2007). Eating disorder not otherwise specified in an inpatient unit: The impact of altering the DSM-IV criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 15, 340e349. Davis, C., Fox, J., Brewer, H., & Ratusny, D. (1995). Motivations to exercise as a function of personality characteristics, age, and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 165e174. de Groot, J., & Rodin, G. (1999). The relationship between eating disorders and childhood trauma. Psychiatric Annals, 29, 225e229. De Young, K. P., & Anderson, D. A. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of exercise motivated by negative affect. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 50e58. Doyle, P. M., Le Grange, D., Loeb, K., Doyle, A.C., & Crosby, R. D. (in press). Early response to family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders. Published online 8 Oct 2008, doi: 10.1002/eat.20763 Driver, C. J. I. (1988). The effect of meal composition on the degree of satiation following a test meal and possible mechanisms involved. British Journal of Nutrition, 60, 441e449. Eddy, K. T., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Tahilani, K., Thompson-Brenner, H., & Herzog, D. B. (2007). Should bulimia nervosa be subtyped by history of anorexia nervosa? A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S67eS71. Fairburn, C. G. (1997). Interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (pp. 278e294). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2007). Thinking afresh about the classification of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S107eS110. Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & O’Connor, M. E. (2008). Eating Disorder Examination (Edition 16.0D). In C. G. Fairburn (Ed.), Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders (pp. 265e308). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fairburn, C. G., Marcus, M. D., & Wilson, G. T. (1993). Cognitive- behavioral therapy for binge eating and bulimia nervosa: A comprehensive treatment manual. In C. G. Fairburn & G. T. Wilson (Eds.), Binge eating: Nature, assessment, and treatment (pp. 361e404). New York, NY: Guilford. Favaro, A., & Santonastaso, P. (1996). Purging behaviors, suicide attempts, and psychiatric symptoms in 398 eating disordered subjects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 99e103.



85

Fisak, B., Peterson, R. D., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Molnar, J. M. (2006). Challenging previous conceptions of vegetarianism and eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders, 11, 195e200. Fischer, S., & Le Grange, D. (2007). Comorbidity and high-risk behaviors in treatment-seeking adolescents with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 751e753. Garner, D. M. (2002). Body image and anorexia nervosa. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 295e303). New York, NY: Guilford. Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1982). The Eating Attitudes Test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871e878. Geller, J., Cockell, S. J., & Drab, D. L. (2001). Assessing readiness for change in the eating disorders: The psychometric properties of the Readiness and Motivation Interview. Psychological Assessment, 13, 189e198. Glass, A. R., Deuster, P. A., Kyle, S. B., Yahiro, J. A., Vigersky, R. A., & Schoomaker, E. B. (1987). Amenorrhea in Olympic marathon runners. Fertility & Sterility, 48, 740e745. Godart, N. T., Flament, M. F., Perdereau, F., & Jeammet, P. (2002). Comorbidity between eating disorders and anxiety disorders: A review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32, 253e270. Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., & Eckert, E. D. (2002). Body dysmorphic disorder in patients with anorexia nervosa: Prevalence, clinical features, and delusionality of body image. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32, 291e300. Grilo, C. M., Masheb, R. M., & Wilson, G. T. (2006). Rapid response to treatment for binge eating disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 602e613. Gruber, A. J., Pope, H. G., Borowiecki, J., & Cohane, G. (1999). The development of the somatomorphic matrix: A biaxial instrument for measuring body image in men and women. In T. S. Olds, J. Dollman & K. I. Norton (Eds.), Kinanthropometry VI (pp. 217e232). Sydney, Australia: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry. Hadigan, C. M., LaChaussee, J. L., Walsh, B. T., & Kissileff, H. R. (1992). 24-hour dietary recall in patients with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 12, 107e111. Haskell, W. L., Lee, I. M., Pate, R. R., Powell, K. E., Blair, S. N., Franklin, B. A., . Bauman, A. (2007). Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 116, 1081e1093. Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 348e358. Johnson, W. G., Boutelle, K. N., Torgrud, L., Davig, J. P., & Turner, S. (2000). What is a binge? The influence of amount, duration, and loss of control criteria on judgments of binge eating. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 471e479. Johnson, W. G., Schlundt, D. G., Barclay, D. R., Carr-Nangle, R. E., & Engler, L. B. (1995). A naturalistic functional analysis of binge eating. Behavior Therapy, 26, 101e118. Kaplan, A. S., Walsh, B. T., Olmsted, M., Attia, E., Carter, J. C., Devlin, M. J., . Parides, M. (2009). The slippery slope: Prediction of successful weight maintenance in anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1037e1045. Keel, P. K., Crow, S., Davis, T. L., & Mitchell, J. E. (2002). Assessment of eating disorders: Comparison of interview and questionnaire data from a long-term follow-up study of bulimia nervosa. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 1043e1047. Keel, P. K., Dorer, D. J., Eddy, K. T., Franko, D., Charatan, D. L., & Herzog, D. B. (2003). Predictors of mortality in eating disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 179e183. Keel, P. K., Mayer, S. A., & Harnden-Fischer, J. H. (2001). Importance of size in defining binge eating episodes in bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 294e301. Klerman, G. L., & Weissman, M. M. (1993). Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: Background and concepts. In G. L. Klerman & M. M. Weissman (Eds.), New applications of interpersonal psychotherapy (pp. 3e26). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press. Lacey, J. H. (1993). Self-damaging and addictive behaviour in bulimia nervosa. A catchment area study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 190e194. Latner, J. D., Hildebrandt, T., Rosewall, J. K., Chisholm, A. M., & Hayashi, K. (2007). Loss of control over eating reflects eating disturbances and general psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2203e2211. Lavender, J. M., & Anderson, D. A. (2009). Effect of perceived anonymity in assessments of eating disordered behaviors and attitudes. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 546e551.


86


Le Grange, D., Doyle, P., Crosby, R. D., & Chen, E. (2008). Early response to treatment in adolescent bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 755e757. Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Agras, W. S., & Dare, C. (2002). Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: A family-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford. Lowe, M. R., Davis, W., Lucks, D., Annunziato, R., & Butryn, M. (2006). Weight suppression predicts weight gain during inpatient treatment of bulimia nervosa. Physiology & Behavior, 87, 487e492. Machado, P. P., Machado, B. C., Goncalves, S., & Hoek, H. W. (2007). The prevalence of eating disorders not otherwise specified. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 212e217. Mattson, M. P., & Wan, R. (2005). Beneficial effects of intermittent fasting and caloric restriction on the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 16, 129e137. McIntosh, V. V., Bulik, C. M., McKenzie, J. M., Luty, S. E., & Jordan, J. (2000). Interpersonal psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 125e139. Mendell, D. A., & Logemann, J. A. (2001). Bulimia and swallowing: Cause for concern. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 252e258. Mitchell, J. E., Cook-Myers, T., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2005). Diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa: Looking ahead to DSM-V. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, S95eS97. Mitchell, J. E., & Peterson, C. B. (2005). Assessment of eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford. Mitchell, J. E., Pomeroy, C., & Adson, D. E. (1997). Managing medical complications. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Mond, J. M., Hay, P. J., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Mitchell, J. E. (2006). Correlates of self-induced vomiting and laxative misuse in a community sample of women. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 40e46. Pasman, L., & Thompson, J. K. (1988). Body image and eating disturbance in obligatory runners, obligatory weightlifters, and sedentary individuals. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 759e769. Phillips, K. A., Kim, J. M., & Hudson, J. I. (1995). Body image disturbance in body dysmorphic disorder and eating disorders obsession or delusions. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 18, 317e334. Poortvliet, P. C., Berube-Parent, S., Drapeau, V., Lamarche, B., Blundell, J. E., & Tremblay, A. (2007). Effects of a healthy meal course on spontaneous energy intake, satiety and palatability. British Journal of Nutrition, 97, 584e590. Poyastro Pinheiro, A., Thornton, L. M., Plotonicov, K. H., Tozzi, F., Klump, K. L., Berrettini, W. H., . Brandt, H. (2007). Patterns of menstrual disturbance in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 424e434. Robinson-O’Brien, R., Perry, C. L., Wall, M. M., Story, M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Adolescent and young adult vegetarianism: Better dietary intake and weight outcomes but increased risk of disordered eating behaviors. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109, 648e655. Rockert, W., Kaplan, A. S., & Olmsted, M. (2007). Eating disorder not otherwise specified: The view from a tertiary care treatment center. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S99eS103. Rodin, G. M. (2002). Eating disorders in diabetes mellitus. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity (2nd ed.). (pp. 286e290) New York, NY: Guilford Press. Root, T. L., Pinheiro, A. P., Thornton, L., Strober, M., Fernandez-Aranda, F., Brandt, H., . Bulik, C. M. (2010). Substance use disorders in women with anorexia disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 14e21. Shapiro, J. R., & Anderson, D. A. (2003). The effects of restraint, gender, and body mass index on the accuracy of self-reported weight. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34, 177e180. Smyth, J. M., Heron, K. E., Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., & Thompson, K. M. (2008). The influence of reported trauma and adverse events on eating disturbance in young adults. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 195e202. Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (1995). Intake interviewing with suicidal patients: A systematic approach. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 26, 41e47. Stice, E., Davis, K., Miller, N. P., & Marti, C. N. (2008). Fasting increases risk for onset of binge eating and bulimic pathology: A 5-year prospective study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 941e946. Telch, C. F., Pratt, E. M., & Niego, S. H. (1998). Obese women with binge eating disorder define the term binge. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 24, 313e317. Thompson, J. K., & Gardner, R. M. (2002). Measuring perceptual body image among adolescents and adults. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 135e141). New York, NY: Guilford.



87

Trabulsi, J., & Schoeller, D. A. (2001). Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism, 281, E891eE899. Turner, H., & Bryant-Waugh, R. (2004). Eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS): Profiles of clients presenting at a community eating disorder service. European Eating Disorders Review, 12, 18e26. Vanderdeycken, W., & Vanderlinden, J. (1983). Denial of illness and the use of self-reporting measures in anorexia nervosa patients. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 101e107. Varady, K. A., & Hellerstein, M. K. (2007). Alternate-day fasting and chronic disease prevention: A review of human and animal trials. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86, 7e13. Villanueva, E. V. (2001). The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 1, 11. Vitousek, K. B., Daly, J., & Heiser, C. (1991). Reconstructing the internal world of the eating-disordered individual: Overcoming denial and distortion in self-report. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10, 647e666. von Ranson, K. M., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Disordered eating and substance use in an epidemiological sample: I. Associations within individuals. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 389e403. Walsh, B. T. (2009a). Special section/eating disorders in DSM-V: Review of existing literature (Part 1) [Special issue]. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(7), 579e580. Walsh, B. T. (2009b). Special section/eating disorders in DSM-V: Review of existing literature (Part 2) [Special issue]. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(8), 673. Wildman, P., Lilenfeld, L. R. R., & Marcus, M. D. (2004). Axis I comorbidity onset and parasuicide in women with eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 190e197. Wilfley, D. E. (2002). Psychological treatment of binge eating disorder. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Williamson, D. A., Martin, C. K., York-Crowe, E., Anton, S. D., Redman, L. M., Han, H., & Ravussin, E. (2007). Measurement of dietary restraint: Validity tests of four questionnaires. Appetite, 48, 183e192. Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. C., Agras, W. S., Walsh, B. T., & Kraemer, H. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa: Time course and mechanisms of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 267e274. Wolfe, B. E., Baker, C. W., Smith, A. T., & Kelly-Weeder, S. (2009). Validity and utility of the current definition of binge eating. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, ,674e686. Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Mitchell, J. E., & Engel, S. G. (2007). Testing the validity of eating disorder diagnoses. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, S40eS45. Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Mitchell, J. E., Thompson, K. M., Redlin, J., Demuth, G., . Haseltine, B. (2001). Eating disturbance and sexual trauma in childhood and adulthood. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 401e412. Work Group on Eating Disorders (2006). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.


C H A P T E R

6 Medical Assessment of Eating Disorders Edward P. Tyson This chapter intends to inform physicians and non-physician caregivers about the important medical complications of eating disorders (ED). Issues to be addressed include why and how they manifest, and how to quickly assess, understand, and treat them from all caregivers’ perspectives. Family and other primary supporters (e.g., friends, teachers, coaches) have the most communication and contact with patients, and are typically their most trusted allies. However, they are sometimes left dangerously in the dark regarding their family member’s critical medical care issues. Providing caregivers with a working understanding of these issues bridges this gap and promotes prompt, necessary, and collaborative intervention. Such knowledge may also circumvent or minimize medical complications, and/or allow for caregivers to be more appropriately supportive when adverse events occur. A second goal of this chapter is to bridge a critical training gap among medical providers. Education on ED is variably included in health professionals’ training programs. Eating disorders are not specifically listed as part of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s (ACGME) required curriculum in a physician’s training programs except in the adolescent medicine part of pediatrics, the combined medicineepediatrics residency programs, or adolescent medicine fellowships. Neither general psychiatry, nor child and adolescent psychiatry requirements, specifically mandate training in ED. Therefore, medical practitioners who treat ED will usually have to seek out specialized education from the literature, from scientific meetings that address ED, and from colleagues in the field.

WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING Eating disorders are serious medical and psychiatric illnesses. With sometimes tragic outcomes, parents, coaches, and clinicians can be fooled into thinking that the bubbly and sweet teenager with anorexia nervosa (AN), who just won the state high school cross country meet, could not possibly be near death. Or, that the normal weight, straight-A physics graduate student who denies any complaints whatsoever may suffer a hypoglycemic seizure from


89


90

6. MEDICAL ASSESSMENT OF EATING DISORDERS

her ED, crash her car, and kill herself and her passenger. Eating disorders are truly “wolves in sheep’s clothing.” Those with ED can look like they are doing “fine” (as patients often describe themselves even at their lowest points), even when all hell is breaking loose in their bodies. A teenager suffering from severe AN may be obviously ill-looking, but the looming dangers can still be missed or dismissed by those around them. Eating disorder providers must always keep in mind that things can go terribly wrong and can be extremely complicated and expensive to treat. The worst outcome of an ED is death. It can come suddenly and without obvious warning. Eating disorders have the highest mortality of any psychiatric illnessesdhigher than depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Cardiac complications are the most common cause of death, with suicide being second in the younger population. Depending on which study one cites, lifetime mortality rates peak at 15e18%, approaching the death rates of certain serious cancers (Birmingham, Su, Hlynsky, Goldner & Gao, 2005; Neuma¨rker, 1998; Sullivan, 1995). The mortality rate for AN is more than 12 times higher than the general population of 15- to 24-year-old females, and AN is the third most common chronic illness of adolescent females (Sullivan 1995; Lucas, Beard, O’Fallon & Kurland, 1991). The cost of medical care can be oppressive. The service and staffing capacities of college health services are being strained to accommodate increasing numbers of suffering students. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the problem is worsening for those in traditional and nontraditional groups (Zhao & Encinosa, 2009). From 1999 to 2006, ED admissions to nonpsychiatric community hospitals increased 18% overall, with related hospital costs increasing 61%. Rates of admissions for ED increased 119% for children under age 12, 48% for those aged 45 to 65, and 24% for those 64 and older. While patients and their families typically are more distressed by purging behaviors than restriction, bulimia nervosa (BN) has an overall lower mortality rate than restricting AN. Although considered by some to be a non-specific term, Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) is the most populated diagnostic group, and may carry a higher mortality and complication rate than either AN or BN (Crow et al., 2009). While overall death rates from ED approach 20%, those rates are averaged over all who have suffered and are not predictive of a particular patient. The more drastic, frequent, or chronic the behavior of the patient, the higher the risks, including the chance of death.

MENTAL ILLNESSES OR MEDICAL ILLNESSES? Depending on one’s perspective, an ED is either a medical illness with psychiatric features or a psychiatric illness with medical complications. In fact, biological and psychiatric issues impact each other. However, the tendency to utilize this deceptive dichotomy puts ED patients in a medical “no-man’s land” that interferes with their getting appropriate assessment and care. Few medical hospitals or general psychiatric units are set up to manage the specific psychiatric needs and dietary management of patients with a serious ED. Therefore, specialized centers are often necessary for safe and adequate management. The reciprocal relationship between a patient’s medical and psychiatric status must be judiciously considered in the assessment and treatment of ED. Starvation, electrolyte abnormalities, hypoglycemia, caffeine toxicity, co-morbid medical conditions such as hypothyroidism, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, sleep deprivation, and other medical issues can


WHAT PATIENTS DO IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEIR DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORY

91

all affect the onset, maintenance, and severity of the ED. Biological conditions, such as starvation, or exercise coupled with restriction, may be enough to trigger an ED or similar behaviors, even in otherwise seemingly low-risk individuals (Kalm & Semba, 2005). It becomes difficult to distinguish cause and effect. The false dichotomy between medical and psychiatric aspects interferes with assessment and treatment in another important way. Health insurance has traditionally divided illnesses into either medical or psychiatric categories and “never the twain shall meet.” Eating disorders are defined in the DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) and traditionally have been covered only by psychiatric benefits that usually have less reimbursement. They are classified as psychiatric illnesses in spite of the facts that: (i) medical complications are what usually instigate treatment and are a critical factor in determining proper levels of care; (ii) ED may be triggered by medical or biologic issues; and (iii) psychiatric residency programs are not required to specifically train about ED. With the significant exception of Adolescent Medicine units found in some academic medical centers, most ED treatment centers are considered psychiatric facilities. Medical units use traditional medical diagnoses (e.g., protein/calorie malnutrition, bradycardia, hypotension, hypoglycemia) as the primary codes rather than ED diagnoses, and are usually covered under medical benefits. In psychiatric centers, psychiatric codes are used as the primary diagnosis codes. Thus, even though the psychiatric and medical treatment centers are treating exactly the same illness, there is a dichotomy in reimbursement. In addition to the economic hardship imposed on families (see Munn, Smeltzer, Smeltzer and Westin, Chapter 21), limited reimbursement can translate into delays in assessment and intervention, interfere with ongoing medical treatment, and worsen outcomes. This issue is especially important in children and adolescents, who may ultimately suffer for many more years because of the earlier age of onset; the damage to their growing bodies may have geometric effects if not addressed early and aggressively.

WHAT PATIENTS DO IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEIR DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORY Rather than discuss medical aspects and risks of each ED separately, it is more relevant to consider the patients’ symptoms versus their diagnostic status. This is particularly true given that some ED patients move between diagnoses over the course of their illnesses, and that EDNOS accounts for the greatest ED population (Agras, Crow, Mitchell, Halmi & Bryson, 2010). Therefore, focus of medical concern should be on the degree of protein calorie malnutrition and dehydration rather than “AN” per se, or on the extent of vomiting or laxative abuse, rather than “BN.” Clinicians using this approach will be more alert to consequences of patients’ behaviors that may otherwise be missed if they do not recognize that patients with one form of an ED may develop symptoms usually found in another diagnostic category. Knowing how their bodies have been injured may help patients turn around their behaviors and limit further complications (Zerbe, 2008). Focusing on medical conditions and consequences may feel more objective and less shameful to patients without using the more inflammatory diagnostic labels. Presenting and explaining the medical and physiological facts in a neutral, non-judgmental way enhances patients’ acceptance that medical consequences are a major, but typically treatable, part of their ED. Providing this cautious


92


reassurance of physical rehabilitation may instill hope and incentivize their early recovery efforts, whereas dealing with the enormity of the emotional and psychosocial aspects of their ED may, at least initially, seem beyond their grasp. Regardless, all involved should be mindful that medical stability is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for recovery, and does not preclude the need for further or more intensive treatment.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON EATING DISORDER ASSESSMENT Box 6.1 provides a list of general recommendations to assist clinicians in circumventing the common pitfalls encountered in ED assessment and treatment. Physicians unfamiliar with ED are cautioned that these patients’ presentations are often counterintuitive relative to those for other medical conditions (e.g., low resting heart rates in ED patients are signs of cardiac compromise versus athletic conditioning), and that their medical status is variable and apt to deteriorate rapidly if not addressed. BOX 6.1

GENERAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE MEDICAL ASSESSMENT OF ED PATIENTS 1. Recheck any preconceived ideas or biases. Examples include: a. Presuming patients have to meet full DSM-IV criteria of AN or BN in order to be at serious risk. Patients with EDNOS have similar levels of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. b. Assuming that psychiatric complaints cannot be due to physical causes. c. Thinking that ED are not serious medical illnesses or that only very thin patients can be dangerously ill from an ED. d. Believing that ED do not occur in children, males, older persons, nonCaucasians or those from lower socioeconomic status. e. Suggesting to patients or their families that they will get over it on their own. f. Suggesting simplistic, misguided approaches, such as, “Just eat desserts” or “Eat snacks and come back in a month.”

2. Treat all patients with respect. Most sufferers want to understand what is going on with their bodies. None asked for their eating disorder, neither do they know what to do about it. 3. Patients’ general appearance/ presentation coupled with their history and vital signs will give clinicians about 80% of the information related to the severity of their status and what is likely to be found on exam. 4. Eating disorders affect every organ system. Consider how each organ system will respond to the behaviors, and how those reactions should evidence themselves. This perspective should guide interpretation of the history, physical exam, laboratory results, ECG, and any radiographs done. See Birmingham and Beaumont (2004) for an exhaustive list of possible medical manifestations in ED patients.

(continued) II. BRIDGING THE GAP: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

GATHERING THE HISTORY

93

BOX 6.1dcont’d 5. Explain medical findings and their causes “as you go” during the exam. For example, acrocyanosis, lanugo, capillary refill delay, and low body temperature are all visual examples of how their body is trying to protect itself and conserve energy. 6. Make it real for them. Let the patient literally feel what is wrong. For example, let the patient feel the changes of pulse quality and rate when they go from lying to standing. Or, let them experience how hard it is to hear their BP when they stand up. 7. For those who claim they are “fine,” challenge them to explain what they think causes the abnormal findings. Participation in treatment makes it harder for them to deny or doubt the obvious physical complications or medical recommendations. 8. Focus questions in the history towards medical issues specific to ED.

9. Look for the consequences that the patient’s history would indicate. If they are not there or conflict with the history given, determine why. For example, if a patient indicates that she doesn’t purge, yet has elevated salivary amylase and low potassium, calmly and directly explain how her medical findings “contradict her self report”. 10. Denial is an integral part of ED; keep the patient’s denials in perspective. 11. One cannot necessarily rely on the patient’s or family’s perceptions as to etiology or seriousness of the problems. 12. Coordinate treatment with other caregivers, including physicians, therapists, dietitians, coaches, and trainers. 13. Severely ill ED patients may be too cognitively impaired to provide informed consent or refuse treatment. Legal counsel may be necessary and treatment should be managed accordingly.

GATHERING THE HISTORY No organ system is spared in malnutrition. Clinicians should therefore anticipate and evaluate for dysfunction of every organ system. Initial risk assessments should consider the following: 1. The types, timing, and pattern of ED behaviors (e.g., restriction, vomiting, laxatives, exercise, withholding insulin). 2. The duration of past and recent ED behavior (usually the longer the duration, the more damage is possible). 3. The severity of expression of the behavior (e.g., vomiting 10 times a day is more severe than twice a day; however, vomiting only once a week, but using ipecac syrup and a toothbrush to do so, may be more serious). Evidence gathered by Crow et al. (2009) suggests that patients with subthreshold AN or BN (i.e., patients with EDNOS) may also have high rates of morbidity and mortality. In a study of 101 children diagnosed with ED between the ages of 5 to 13, 78% were hospitalized, 61% had potentially life-threatening complications, but only 37% of those met full


94


diagnostic criteria, and only 51% met weight criteria (Madden, Morris, Zurynski, Kohn & Elliot, 2009). Other studies evaluating EDNOS in adolescents and adults have found similar trends (Dalle & Clugi, 2007; Eddy, Celio Doyle, Hoste, Herzog & Le Grange, 2008). Thus, a substantial number of ED patients will be dangerously overlooked if clinicians only consider at risk those who fulfill strict diagnostic criteria.

Taking the Medical History The medical history must be detailed and specifically focused on ED in order for clinicians to identify the full range of existing problems. As denial and secrecy are prevalent and entrenched in ED, frequent surveying to assess for medical risk can prevent overlooking critical problems. This should be continued well into treatment, as medical problems can return with relapses or exacerbations of the ED. Using checklists and forms to be completed before the start of appointments is a way to do this efficiently. Box 6.2 provides an example of a patient checklist that enables both medical and nonmedical professionals to get a better sense of the patient’s status and to see if more assessment or referral is needed. The emphasis is to be thorough and to check often. In addition to assessing food and fluid intake, it is also important to estimate patients’ use of caffeine. Caffeine intake can be alarmingly high and can cause cardiac problems, gastroesophageal reflux, sleep dysfunction, anxiety, and dehydration. Paradoxically, when used “for energy,” caffeine forces the body to burn calories that it may be trying to preserve, thus accelerating one’s physical decline and fatigue.

Differential Diagnosis It is important to distinguish ED from other illnesses. There are many medical and psychiatric illnesses that can present as, disguise, or be mistaken for ED. Incorrect diagnoses can have devastating consequences. Clinicians should screen for all possibilities early on and again if aspects of the ED are not responding as would be expected. Box 6.3 lists other illnesses that may mimic, obscure, or increase the risk of ED.

THE EXAMINATION: CORRELATE WITH THE HISTORY Findings on the exam should be viewed in context with the history. Much can be learned from observing the person, gathering the history, and comparing expected findings to what is actually seen on examination (e.g., if a patient with low potassium indicates that she is not vomiting, the discrepancy between the history and findings needs to be resolved). Nonmedical professionals benefit from comparing the history to observations of the patient’s interactions and appearance. For example, if the patient’s hands or feet are blue, but she states that she is fine, it is reasonable to surmise that she is in a significant energy deficit, and probably has been for some time. If there is any concern, referral to an ED medical specialist is appropriate.

Vital Signs It is impossible to overstate the importance of a patient’s vital signs as indicators of overall health status. Vital signs consist of weight (and BMI), temperature, blood pressure (BP), and pulse. These are simple to assess even by non-medical professionals and can be very telling,


THE EXAMINATION: CORRELATE WITH THE HISTORY

BOX 6.2

PATIENT CHECKLIST Name: ___________________________Date: _____________________ Age: ______ The following is a list of symptoms or complaints you may or may not have. Please read each one and check any and all items that apply, even if they may not have changed since your last visit. This is CONFIDENTIAL. Please fold it over when done and hand it to the therapist or receptionist when you are ready to be seen. _____ Feeling cold much of the time _____ Fingers or toes turn blue at times* _____ “Hot flashes” or sweating spells (at night or other times not related to exercise)* _____ Dizziness or feeling like you’re going to pass out at times* _____ Mouth feels dry at times _____ Chew gum frequently _____ Heart beat going fast suddenly* _____ Feeling your heart “skip beats” or like it “jumps” at times* _____ Chest pain* _____ Shortness of breath or trouble breathing recently* _____ Difficulty thinking straight or remembering things as well recently _____ Falling asleep or extreme fatigue during the daytime (e.g., at school or work) _____ Trouble falling or staying asleep at night _____ Loss or decrease of menstrual periods _____ Hair falling out _____ Constipation or difficulty having a bowel movement _____ Swelling in your feet or hands* _____ Stomach hurting* _____ Blood when you have thrown up or gone to the bathroom* _____ Noticing something that looks like coffee grounds when you have thrown up* _____ Hurting yourself by cutting, scratching, burning, or other forms of self-inflicted injury* _____ Pain in one or more of your bones (like your shin or feet) or joints* _____ I have thrown up at least once recently* _____ I have taken some laxatives recently* _____ I have taken some diet pills recently* _____ I have taken stuff to make me throw up* _____ I have taken some water pills recently* _____ I have been drinking alcohol enough to get drunk recently _____ I have taken other stuff that I would rather not talk about _____ I have had thoughts about hurting or killing myself recently* About how many calories a day have you been eating for the last week (on average)?______ About how much fluid have you consumed in the last day? _____ How much caffeine? ____ (Give the amount in ounces, cups, or # of water bottles) *Indicates that the author suggests a physician be notified and involved.


95

96


BOX 6.3

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF EATING DISORDERS

Medical illnesses that may mimic or present as an Eating Disorder Any chronic disease or infection Gastrointestinal illnesses Celiac Disease Ulcerative colitis Chronic parasitic, bacterial infections Malabsorption Endocrine disorders Diabetes mellitus Addison’s Disease (adrenal insufficiency) Hyperthyroidism Hypopituitarism Cancers

Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (can also be a consequence of an eating disorder)

Medical illnesses/conditions associated with an increased risk of an Eating Disorder Diabetes mellitus Celiac Disease Gastric bypass Illnesses or conditions that require increased attention toward or regulation of food intake Attention Deficit Disorder

especially when put into perspective with the rest of the history. Because of their importance, the vital signs will be discussed in detail. Weight and body mass index (BMI). Weight seems to be the primary focus of patients, their families, dietitians, and other professionals, but it’s use is not specific, often not helpful, and can be misleading. There is debate about the clinical utility and impact of telling patients their weight. Given its lack of specificity and patients’ ambivalence regarding their weight, consider redirecting the discussion to more meaningful determinants of their health, such as their body temperature, pulse, BP, hydration, and cardiac exam. Clinicians should be cognizant that increases or decreases of weight do not give information as to what causes the weight change, except in the acute setting. Rapid and significant changes of weight are almost always from fluid shifts, and not from true body tissue increases or loss. Even as patients’ weights change over time, it is hard to determine how much is due to muscle (including heart muscle), the other organs, or body fat. Since fat is primarily a form of stored energy and generally not stored by the body until there are excess calories in the diet, it will be one of the later causes of weight increase. However, patients requiring weight restoration usually believe that fat is the first source of weight gain, and fail to understand the vital role and functions of dietary fat and fat tissue in the body. Education and reassurance are a necessity for these patients during the refeeding process (see Croll, Chapter 8). Without sufficient protein in their diet, even if patients take in enough calories, they will ultimately lose protein from organs (e.g., brain, kidney, liver), muscle (including heart muscle), tendons, ligaments, cartilage, neurotransmitters, hormones, and all other parts of the body that require protein. Patients who do not eat enough protein to compensate for losses


THE EXAMINATION: CORRELATE WITH THE HISTORY

97

due to routine activity and exercise tend to lose a disproportionate amount of muscle relative to body fat. When this occurs without enough substrate of protein to repair that breakdown, muscle will decrease both in mass and in its ability to function. Muscle weighs more than fat for the same volume; thus weight may go down faster as a result, but the percent body fat may actually increase. It is possible, then, that a patient who is severely malnourished and has very low body weight may have a relatively high percent body fat (the actual amount of fat though would still be low compared to peers). Clinicians should be careful in measuring body fat in ED as this fact may be misinterpreted and lead to misdirected recommendations from clinicians and calamitous reactionary behaviors by the sufferer. Body mass index (BMI) may be a less triggering concept for patients than weight, although it is debatable whether it yields more clinically meaningful information (e.g., it does not account for natural age, ethnic, and/or body build sources of weight diversity). In fact, some ED specialists argue that over-emphasis on weight/BMI is “inappropriate, misleading and potentially harmful” (Lask & Frampton, 2009, p. 165). Measures of BMI attempt to put body size into perspective by factoring in weight as a function of height. Body mass index growth charts by sex and age can be downloaded from the Centers for Disease Control (see http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/clinical_charts.htm). Measurements from childhood can be extrapolated to reasonably predict where the young patient should be at a future date by following the curves. Rather than over-focus on the exact weight/BMI values, assessing their rate of change provides relevant clinical information. The lower the BMI, and the more rapid the rate of weight decline, the higher the likelihood of medical problems, especially cardiac issues. In pediatrics, the diagnosis of “Failure to Thrive (FTT)” can also be applied when a child’s height for weight falls to less than 80% of predicted or when two major growth lines are crossed on a growth chart. Either should trigger aggressive evaluation. If FTT or its equivalent is diagnosed in adults, clinicians should consider an ED as a possible etiology. Temperature. Patients’ temperatures may reveal important clinical issues. As the nutritional state declines and the body is forced to use its reserves, the body will try to conserve itself in an effort to combat excessive losses. Since the body burns about 60% of its calories just to produce body heat, one of the most effective ways to conserve energy is to lower body temperature, sometimes to as low as 92e94 F. It may help to advise patients that their body is suffering just as much during temperature drops as with fever spikes of the same degree. Research by Nolan, Morley, Vanden Hoek & Hickey (2003) indicates that in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), lowering the body temperature improves morbidity and mortality. Thus, the hypothermia associated with declining body temperatures secondary to ED, may actually be cardioprotective, and a sign that the body is trying to protect the heart from serious consequence. Hypothermia is accompanied by other findings. The body tries to prevent heat loss and tends to shunt blood more to the core and away from the periphery, such as fingers and toes, where the ability to lose heat quickly occurs. The fingers, hands, toes, and feet can be very cold to touch and be bluish in color (acrocyanosis). Often, delayed capillary refill occurs, where blood only slowly returns to the skin. One way to check this is to have both the patient and an observer squeeze their fists for 5 seconds and then simultaneously open them. Compare the speed at which the pink coloration and blood flow returns to their palms and fingers. Delays can be dramatic, revealing significant medical issues to the patient if explained sensitively.


98


Both acrocyanosis and delayed capillary refill may be signs of the heart having difficulty with pumping blood into the more distant body sites. As the hearts shrinks from malnutrition, its pumping capacity can decline. Therefore, physicians must consider whether these findings are from low body heat, poor cardiac capacity, or both. Temperature, body heat, and calories in context. For ED patients who take in very few calories, even small levels of activity burn essential calories and contribute to weight decline. For example, a 20-year-old female who is 50 500 and weighs 115 lbs, burns about 1370 calories a day at rest with no added activity (i.e., her basal metabolic rate). To warm 3 liters of ice water (a reasonable daily intake of fluid), the body will need to burn about 150e180 calories. Standing burns about 30e50 more calories per hour depending on one’s weight. Pacing or muscle co-contractions (or dynamic tension) burn even more calories depending on their duration. Even chewing gum can increase calories burned. These often overlooked behaviors are common in ED and insidiously contribute to weight decline. Understanding this will help patients and caregivers accept activity restrictions, even complete bedrest, when patients are acutely ill or severely underweight. Pulse. Clinicians should note the heart rate (HR) in beats per minute and the quality of the pulse as strong, weak, or thready (like a thread sliding under the observer’s finger). Check the pulse while the patient is laying down (supine) for a minute, preferably with the eyes closed, to mimic the resting pulse, when the pulse is at its slowest. Generally, a resting pulse of less than 50 is considered slow and termed bradycardia. A resting HR above 100 is termed tachycardia. After the supine pulse is obtained, compare the speed and quality of the pulse upon standing. A significant increase in pulse upon standing is called orthostasis and is considered abnormal. Generally, an increase of 20 beats per minute for those with a normal baseline HR is considered significant, and is often, but not always, a sign of dehydration. In malnourished patients, the change may be due to the weakening capacity of the body’s neurological and cardiac regulators needed for adaptation to changes in gravitational forces on the body. In patients with very low HR, using a percent of change of pulse rather than just a change of 20 beats may be more helpful, as a change of the same number of beats per minute in slower HRs is more significant (e.g., a resting HR of 40 that goes up to 60 with standing has increased by 50%). As malnutrition worsens, the body’s ability to adapt even to positional changes can be impaired. If this minor challenge is taxing to the cardiovascular system, then more rigorous demands, such as exercise, may be dangerous. Orthostasis is a common problem in ED and can persist for weeks after nutritional rehabilitation has begun. Understanding bradycardia in the context of ED is one area in which the gap in medical training on ED routinely manifests. It is critical to distinguish when bradycardia is a sign of fitness or a sign of dysfunction. The “athletic heart syndrome” is a term describing athletes’ hearts that have adapted to aerobic exercise and developed the capacity to pump more blood with each beat, translating into a slower HR at rest. Clinicians should use caution in making this diagnosis, especially in athletes with signs of an ED. In a study by Bjørnstad, Storstein, Dyre Meen and Hals (1991) of 1299 athletics students in Norway, the average HR was 62, and for controls 68. In the complimentary study of 1450 athletes, the average HR was 61 for males and 64 for females compared to 68 for controls (Storstein, Bjørnstad, Hals & Dyre Meen, 1991). These studies, which are probably the largest ones looking at athlete HRs, indicate that resting HRs that are in the lower 50s or below are unlikely to be consistent with athletic


CARDIAC ASSESSMENT

99

training. In such cases, clinicians should be looking for other signs and causes of the body adapting to energy shortage. Blood pressure (BP). Blood pressure is another fairly simple method that can give important signs of patients’ cardiovascular status. The bottom limits of normal BP are usually considered to be 90/60 (readings for children can be somewhat different). As with pulse, low values or orthostatic BP changes are instructive when evaluating ED patients. An orthostatic drop of more than 20 points in the systolic (top number) and 10 of the diastolic (bottom number) is considered significant. As with HR, the lower the baseline pressure is, any change is considered more significant. Manual readings are recommended as the quality of the sound heard through the stethoscope can also be indicative of cardiovascular function. The body can do a variety of things to increase or decrease the BP to adapt to circumstances. Adaptations that are weak, inappropriate, or do not occur as expected indicate at least some cardiovascular compromise. Usually in ED, especially if there is restriction, BP tends to decline and the heart sounds required to determine the BP decline can be harder to hear.

CARDIAC ASSESSMENT Assessing the cardiovascular system is essential, as complications are common and are the primary cause of cause of death in ED. Box 6.4 lists possible cardiac findings in ED. While HR and BP readings are the most basic and necessary cardiac vital signs, feeling and listening to the heart by palpation and auscultation also provides essential data. Important information is gleaned from feeling the radial pulse in the wrist and the heart’s pulse on the chest, called the point of maximal impulse (PMI). In normals, the PMI can usually be felt on the chest at about the 4th or 5th rib space (intercostal space), in line with the midpoint of the clavicle. In athletes, healthy adolescents and young adults, the PMI should be easily palpable because their heart beats strongly, especially if the chest wall is fairly thin. As the heart grows smaller from malnutrition, the PMI moves more to the midline and slightly upward. It also tends to get weaker and can even be absent to palpation. The location and volume of the heart sounds can also suggest a smaller, less dynamic heart. As the heart muscle atrophies, the loudness of the heart sounds tends to decrease. The area on the chest where they can be heard best (the silhouette) also shrinks. Because of these architectural changes, valves may not fit quite as well, like a door in the winter, and slight murmurs may become more evident. They are usually not significant. Physicians should also be alert to other cardiac complications, including pericardial effusions (fluid around the heart) and abnormal rhythms. There are differing reports on how common effusions occur. If in doubt, the physician should obtain an echocardiogram in addition to an electrocardiogram (ECG). Cardiac dysrhythmias are common. The most common is bradycardia; rates can be dramatically low, including into the teens. The Society for Adolescent Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend hospitalization for those with HRs 30 kg/m2 (Lau et al., 2007). The presence of a mood disorder may negatively affect adherence to weight management interventions (Lau et al., 2007). Allison, Grilo, Masheb & Stunkard (2007) found a higher proportion of both BED and NES groups reported neglect and emotional abuse compared with overweight/obese controls. Comorbidity rates in BED are similar to those of other ED, and are not explained by obesity alone (Wonderlich et al., 2009).

Medication Guidelines: Antidepressants Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. With the high comorbidity of mood disturbance and depression in BED, antidepressant treatment should be considered. As described in the section on BN, fluoxetine is useful in reducing binges and can be helpful in BED. Fluvoxamine has been found to reduce the frequency of binges in BED and to decrease body mass index regardless of the presence of depression (Hudson et al., 1998). The SSRIs led to greater reductions in binge eating and psychiatric symptoms in BED patients when compared to placebo (Brownley, Berkman, Sedway, Lohr & Bulik, 2007). Sertraline has been found to be effective in treating NES (O’Reardon et al., 2006). Some patients demonstrated a rapid response (within 2 weeks) and others a more gradual response (between 4 to 8 weeks). Sertraline is also effective for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (Davidson, Rothbaum, Van der Kolk, Sikes & Farfel, 2001). Many ED patients have experienced trauma in their lives and often have intrusive thoughts, flashbacks, and nightmares. Finally, of the SSRIs, paroxetine is associated with the highest weight gain, and thus it may not be the ideal front line treatment choice for BED (Stahl, 2005). Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). The TCAs may help in the short-term reduction of binge eating episodes (Kru¨ger & Kennedy, 2000), but the effect may not endure. Indeed, some studies show weight increases and


EATING DISORDERS NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED

121

increased preference for sweets in long-term treatment with TCAs (Berken, Weinstein & Stern, 1984). Antidepressant action did not appear essential for the benefit of TCAs on reducing binge eating (McCann & Agras, 1990). The therapeutic action may be in reducing appetite rather than elevating mood. The MAOIs are similarly contraindicated with BED due to issues of dietary restrictions and risks for a hypertensive crisis if the diet is not followed.

Anticonvulsants Topiramate. Topiramate decreases binge eating behavior, obesity, and other associated features in BED (McElroy et al., 2007a). We found it effective in reducing bingeing in a morbidly obese woman. As previously discussed in BN, slow titration should be followed to limit side effects. Topiramate may be effective in the treatment of SRED (Howell et al., 2009). Sleep-related EDs are more common than typically realized, especially in patients who suffer from daytime ED (Winkelman, Herzog & Fava, 1999). Zonisamide. Zonisamide was found to decrease binge eating episodes in BED patients, but was not well-tolerated (McElroy et al., 2007b).

Alternative Pharmacologic Agents Sibutramine. Sibutramine is a schedule IV controlled serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing binge eating, eating pathology (disinhibition and hunger), and depressive symptoms (Appolinario et al., 2003; Wilfley et al., 2008). The medication was well tolerated in studies, but some patients experienced small but significant increases in pulse and blood pressure. For this reason, the authors recommended trying the lower dose of 10 mg as opposed to the studied dose of 15 mg (Wilfley et al., 2008). Yager (2008) advocates using the studied dose of 15 mg/day, but carefully monitoring blood pressure and modifying the treatment as needed. Other agents. Baclofen, a GABA-B receptor agonist, has been shown in some small samples to reduce the binge eating by at least 50%, to reduce food cravings and to be well-tolerated (Broft et al., 2007). Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, demonstrated reduced binge behavior, improved global functioning, and was well-tolerated (Brennan et al., 2008).

Combining Treatments Topiramate might be considered a first-line therapy for BED patients with obesity, along with CBT, IPT, SSRIs, and possibly sibutramine and orlistat (McElroy et al., 2007a). Evaluation of BED treatment studies suggest that there is a greater reduction in binge eating symptoms when receiving targeted ED psychotherapies such as CBT or IPT (Wonderlich et al., 2009). Clinically, we start with SSRIs combined with psychotherapy as our initial treatment. We are using topiramate more frequently as adjunctive treatment if bingeing has not resolved with the therapeutic dose of SSRIs. Frequently, we see patients whose bingeing did not improve after treatment with a number of SSRIs, in which case we often go directly to topiramate.


122

7. PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATION

Treatment Considerations Leombruni, Gastaldi, Lavagnino & Fassino (2008) questioned whether BED made patients less tolerant of side effects. This raises an interesting question as to whether patients who work to numb emotional discomfort with food may find elements of treatment intolerable. It is helpful to discuss common side effects with patients, advising them that they often diminish over time and that their clinician will adjust medications if the side effects remain intolerable. For SRED, patients’ current medications should be reviewed to see if they are affecting sleep or increasing appetite. Zolpidem (as well as other sedative hypnotics) has been associated with this condition; patients are either amnesic or partially aware of the eating when reflecting on a disrupted sleep (Najjar, 2007). In such cases, the offending medication should be stopped.

MEDICATION MANAGEMENT: BRIDGING THE PUZZLING GAPS This chapter has “pieced together” the salient psychopharmacological literature on ED. To summarize, the most important puzzle pieces to remember include: • In AN, antidepressants, particularly SSRIs, can be helpful in treating the psychiatric comorbidities and may help prevent relapse • Atypical antipsychotics can help patients to manage ED thoughts • In BN, higher doses of SSRIs are needed to treat bulimic symptoms. Unresolved bulimic behaviors can be treated with topiramate. Mood stabilizers may be necessary because of comorbid bipolar disorder • Naltrexone is helpful for both ED behavior and self-injury, which is often seen in this impulsive group • For EDNOS, guidelines should be followed for AN or BN depending on the predominant symptoms • For BED, SSRIs or anticonvulsants may be beneficial • Bupropion should not be used with any of these conditions because of the risk of seizures. Eating disorder treatment is a challenging psychiatric puzzle, requiring management of both eating symptoms and other psychiatric comorbidities. Luckily, some medications used to treat specific ED also target mood disorders, anxiety, PTSD, and other related conditions. Within this work, it is vital to develop good rapport with patients, take an in-depth history, and be open to adjusting the pieces of the puzzle as new issues come to light. These are complicated conditions, but piecing together these many disparate elements into a picture of recovery is well-worth the effort.

References Allison, K. C., Grilo, C. M., Masheb, R. M., & Stunkard, A. J. (2007). High self-reported rates of neglect and emotional abuse, by persons with binge eating disorder and night eating syndrome. Behavior Research and Therapy, 45(12), 2874e2883.


MEDICATION MANAGEMENT: BRIDGING THE PUZZLING GAPS

123

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington DC (4th ed., text rev). Author. American Psychiatric Association (2006). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. Available online at: http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_12.aspx doi:10.1176/appi. books.9780890423363.138660 Appolinario, J. C., Bacaltchuk, J., Sichieri, R., Claudino, A. M., Godoy-Matos, A., Morgan, C., . Coutinho, W. (2003). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sibutramine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 1109e1116. Arnone, D. (2005). Review of the use of topiramate for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Annals of General Psychiatry, 4(5), 1e14. doi:10.1186/1744-859X-4-5 Attia, E., & Schroeder, L. (2005). Pharmacologic treatment of anorexia nervosa: Where do we go from here? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, S60eS63. Bailey, R. K. (2003). Atypical psychotropic medications and their adverse effects: A review for the African-American primary care physician. Journal of the National Medical Association, 95(2), 137e144. Berken, G. H., Weinstein, D. O., & Stern, W. C. (1984). Weight gain. A side-effect of tricyclic antidepressants. Journal of Affective Disorders, 7(2), 133e138. Berkman, N. D., Bulik, C. M., Brownley, K. A., Lohr, K. N., Sedway, J. A., Rooks, A., & Gartlerhner, G. (2006). Management of eating disorders (RTI-UNC Evidence report/Technology assessment No. 135). Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website: http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/ eatingdisorders/eatdis.pdf Blinder, B. J., Cumella, E. J., & Sanathara, V. A. (2006). Psychiatric comorbidities of female inpatients with eating disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 454e462. Bosanac, P., Kurlender, S., Norman, T., Hallam, K., Wesnes, K., Manktelow, T., & Burrows, G. (2007). An openlabel study of quetiapine in anorexia nervosa. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 22, 223e230. Brennan, B. P., Roberts, J. L., Fogarty, K. V., Reynolds, K. A., Jonas, J. M., & Hudson, J. I. (2008). Memantine in the treatment of binge eating disorder: An open-label, prospective trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41(6), 520e526. Broft, A. I., Spanos, A., Corwin, R. L., Mayer, L., Steinglass, J., Devlin, M. J., Attia, E., & Walsh, B. T. (2007). Baclofen for binge eating: An open-label trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(8), 687e691. Brownley, K. A., Berkman, N. D., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007). Binge eating disorder treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(4), 337e348. Bulik, C. M., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., & Lohr, K. N. (2007). Anorexia nervosa treatment: A systemic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 310e320. Button, E. J., Chadalavada, B., & Palmer, R. L. (2010). Mortality and predictors of death in a cohort of patients presenting to an eating disorders service. International Journal of Eating Disorders. E-pub ahead of print, http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19544558; 10.1002/eat.20715 Casner, J. A., Weinheimer, B., & Gualtier, T. C. (1996). Naltrexone and self-injurious behavior: A retrospective population study. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(5), 389e394. Castro, J., Deulofeu, R., Gila, A., Puig, J., & Toro, J. (2004). Persistence of nutritional deficiencies after short-term weight recovery in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 169e178. Couturier, J., & Lock, J. (2007). A review of medication use for children and adolescents with eating disorders. The Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16(4), 173e176. Crawford, P. M. (2009). Managing epilepsy in women of childbearing age. Drug Safety, 32(4), 293e307. Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. E., Roerig, J. D., & Steffen, K. (2009a). What potential role is there for medication treatment in anorexia nervosa? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(1), 18. Crow, S. J., Petersen, C. B., Swanson, S. A., Raymond, N. C., Specker, S., Eckert, E. D., & Mitchell, J. E. (2009b). Increased mortality in bulimia nervosa and other eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(12), 1342e1346. Davidson, J. R., Rothbaum, B. O., Van der Kolk, B. A., Sikes, C. R., & Farfel, G. M. (2001). Multicenter, double-blind comparison of sertraline and placebo in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 485e492.


124


Eddy, K. T., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Tahilani, K., Thompson-Brenner, H., & Herzog, D. B. (2008). Diagnostic crossover in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Implications for DSM-V. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165 (2), 245e250. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Faris, P. L., Kim, S. W., Meller, W. H., Goodale, R. L., Oakman, S. A., Hofbaver, R. D., . Hartman, B. K. (2000). Effect of decreasing afferent vagal activity with ondansetron on symptoms of bulimia nervosa: A randomized, doubleblind trial. The Lancet, 355, 792e797. Ferguson, C. P., La Via, M. C., Crossan, P. J., & Kaye, W. H. (1999). Are serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors effective in underweight anorexia nervosa? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 11e17. Fiedorowicz, J. G., & Swartz, K. L. (2004). The role of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in current psychiatric practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10(4), 239e248, July. Fluoxetine Bulimia Nervosa Collaborative Study Group (1992). Fluoxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 139e147. Fung, S. M., & Ferrill, M. J. (2001). Treatment of bulimia nervosa with ondansetron. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 35, 1270e1273. Gardner, D. M., Baldessarini, R. J., & Waraich, P. (2005). Modern antipsychotic drugs: A critical overview. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172(13), 1703e1711. Gelber, D., Levine, J., & Belmaker, R. H. (2001). Effect of inositol on bulimia nervosa and binge eating. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 345e348. Glasofer, D. R., Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Eddy, K. T., Yanovski, S. Z., Theim, K. R., Mirch, M. C., . Yanovski, J. A. (2007). Binge eating in overweight treatment-seeking adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(1), 95e105. Goldbloom, D. S. (1997). Evaluating the efficacy of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of eating disorders. Essential Psychopharmacology, 2(1), 71e88. Goldstein, D. J., Wilson, M. G., Ascroft, R. C., & Al-Banna, M. (1999). Effectiveness of fluoxetine therapy in bulimia nervosa regardless of comorbid depression. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 19e27. Griengl, H., Sendera, A., & Dantendorfer, K. (2001). Naltrexone as a treatment of self-injurious behaviordA case report. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 103, 234e236. Gross, H., Ebert, M. H., Faden, V. B., Goldberg, S. C., Kaye, W. H., Caine, E. D., . Zinberg, N. (1983). A double-blind trial of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in primary anorexia nervosa. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 3(3), 165e171. Grucza, R. A., Przybeck, T. R., & Cloninger, C. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in a community sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48(2), 124e131. Guarda, A. S. (2008). Treatment of anorexia nervosa: Insights and obstacles. Physiology & Behavior, 94, 113e120. Heiden, A., De Zwaan, M., Frey, R., Presslich, O., & Kasper, S. (1998). Paroxetine in a patient with obsessivecompulsive disorder, anorexia nervosa and schizotypal personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 23(3), 179e180. Horne, R. L., Ferguson, J. M., Pope, H. G., Jr., Hudson, J. I., Lineberry, C. G., Ascher, J., & Cato, A. (1988). Treatment of bulimia with bupropion: A multicenter controlled trial [Abstract]. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 49(7), 262e266. Howell, M. J., Schenck, C. H., & Crow, S. J. (2009). A review of nighttime eating disorders. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 13, 23e34. Hrdlicka, M., Beranova, I., Zamecnikova, R., & Urbanek, T. (2008). Mirtazapine in the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 187e189. Hudson, J. I., McElroy, S. L., Raymond, N. C., Crow, S., Keck, P. E., Jr., Carter, W. P., . Jonas, J. M. (1998). Fluvoxamine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder: A multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1756e1762. Kaye, W. H., Greeno, C. G., Moss, H., Fernstrom, J., Fernstrom, M., Lilenfeld, L. R., . Mann, J. J. (1998). Alterations in serotonin activity and psychiatric symptoms after recovery from bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 927e935. Kaye, W. H., Nagata, T., Weltzin, T. E., Hsu, L. K., Sokol, M. S., McConaha, C., . Deep, D. (2001). Double-blind placebo-controlled administration of fluoxetine in restricting- and restricting-purging-type anorexia nervosa. Biological Psychiatry, 49(7), 644e652. Kaye, W. H., Weltzin, T. E., Hsu, L. K., & Bulik, C. M. (1991). An open trial of fluoxetine in patients with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 52(11), 464e471.


MEDICATION MANAGEMENT: BRIDGING THE PUZZLING GAPS

125

Konstantynowicz, J., Kadziela-Olech, H., Kaczmarski, M., Zebaze, R. M., Iuliano-Burns, S., PiotrowsfkaJastrzebska, J., & Seeman, E. (2005). Depression in anorexia nervosa: A risk factor for osteoporosis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 90, 5382e5385. Kru¨ger, S., & Kennedy, S. H. (2000). Psychopharmacotherapy of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 25(5), 497e508. La Via, M. C., Gray, N., & Kaye, W. H. (2000). Case reports of olanzapine treatment of anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 363e366. Lau, D. C., Douketis, J. D., Morrison, K. M., Hramiak, I. M., Sharma, A. M., & Ur, E. (2007). For members of the Obesity Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Panel. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children (summary). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(8), S1eS13. Leombruni, P., Gastaldi, F., Lavagnino, L., & Fassino, S. (2008). Oxcarbazepine for the treatment of binge eating disorder: A case series. Advances in Therapy, 25(7), 718e724. Lock, J. D., & Fitzpatrick, K. K. (2009, March). Anorexia nervosa. Clinical Evidence, 3(1011), 1e19. Marrazzi, M. A., Bacon, J. P., Kinzie, J., & Luby, E. D. (1995). Naltrexone use in the treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10, 163e172. McCann, U. D., & Agras, W. (1990). Successful treatment of nonpurging bulimia nervosa with desipramine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1509e1513. McElroy, S. L., Kotwal, R., & Keck, P. E., Jr. (2006). Comorbidity of eating disorders with bipolar disorder and treatment implications. Bipolar Disorders, 8, 686e695. McElroy, S. L., Hudson, J. I., Capece, J. A., Beyers, K., Fisher, A. C., Rosenthal, N. R., & Topiramate Binge Eating Disorder Research Group. (2007a). Topiramate for the treatment of binge eating disorder associated with obesity: A placebo-controlled study. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1039e1048. McElroy, S., Kotwal, R., Guerdjikova, A., Weige, J., Nelson, E., Lake, K. A., . Hudson, J. (2007b). Zonisamide in the treatment of binge eating disorder with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68 (1), 1897e1906. McGilley, B. M., & Pryor, T. L. (1998). Assessment and treatment of bulimia nervosa. American Family Physician, 57 (11), 2743e2753. Najjar, M. (2007). Zolpidem and amnestic sleep related eating disorder. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 3(6), 637e638. Nickel, C., Tritt, K., Muehlbacher, M., Pedrosa Gil, F., Mitterlehner, F. O., Kaplan, P., Lahmann, C., . Nickel, M. K. (2005). Topiramate treatment in bulimia nervosa patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 295e300. Nurnberg, H., Hensley, P. L., Heiman, J. R., Croft, H. A., Debattista, C., & Paine, S. (2008). Sildenafil treatment of women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(4), 395e404. O’Reardon, J. P., Allison, K. C., Martino, N. S., Lundgren, J. D., Heo, M., & Stunkard, A. J. (2006). A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline in the treatment of night eating syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 893e898. Papadopoulos, F. C., Ekbom, A., Brandt, L., & Ekselius, L. (2009). Excess mortality, causes of death and prognostic factors in anorexia nervosa. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 10e17. Physicians’ Desktop Reference Health (2009). Prescription Drug Information and Health Information. Wellbutrin / Prescription Drug Information, Side Effects/PDRHealth. Available at: http://www.pdrhealth.com/health/clinicaltrials-index.aspx Peters, T. E., Parvin, M., Petersen, C., Faircloth, V. C., & Levine, R. L. (2007). A case report of Wernicke’s encephalopathy in a pediatric patient with anorexia nervosa-restricting type. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 376e383. Powers, P. S., Bannon, Y., Eubanks, R., & McCormick, T. (2007). Quetiapine in anorexia nervosa patients: An open label outpatient pilot study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 21e26. Prousky, J. E. (2003). Pellagra may be a rare secondary complication of anorexia nervosa: A systematic review of the literature. Alternative Medicine Review, 82, 180e185. Ricca, V., Mannucci, E., Paionni, A., Di Bernardo, M., Cellini, M., Cabras, P. L., & Rotella, C. M. (1999). Venlafaxine versus fluoxetine in the treatment of atypical anorectic outpatients: A preliminary study. Eating and Weight Disorders, 4(1), 10e14.


126


Rosenfeld, W. E., Doose, D. R., Walker, S. A., & Nayak, R. K. (1997). Effect of topiramate on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia, 38(3), 317e323. Shapiro, J. R., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007). Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 321e336. Sonne, S., Rubey, R., Brady, K., Malcolm, R., & Morris, T. (1996). Naltrexone treatment of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184(3), 192e195. Stahl, S. M. (2005). Essential psychopharmacology: the prescriber’s guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Svirko, E., & Hawton, K. (2007). Self-injurious behavior and eating disorders: The extent and nature of the association. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 37(4), 409e421. Tousoulis, D., Antonopoulos, A. S., Antoniades, C., Saldari, C., Stefanadi, E., Siasos, G., . Stefanadis, C. (2009). Role of depression in heart failuredChoosing the right antidepressive treatment. International Journal of Cardiology. Advance online publication, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19501922?itool¼EntrezSystem2.PEntrez Trivedi, M. H., Fava, M., Wisniewski, S. R., Thase, M. W., Quitkin, F., Werden, D., . Rush, A. J. (2006). Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression. New England Journal of Medicine, 354(12), 1243e1252. Walsh, B., Agras, W., Devlin, M. J., Fairburn, C. G., Wilson, G., Kahn, C., & Chally, K. (2000). Fluoxetine for bulimia nervosa following poor response to psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(8), 1332e1334. Walsh, B., Kaplan, A. S., Attia, E., Olmsted, M., Parides, M., Carter, J. C., . Rockert, W. (2006). Fluoxetine after weight restoration in anorexia nervosa. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(22), 2605e2612. Wilfley, D. E., Crow, S. J., Hudson, J. I., Mitchell, J. E., Berkowitz, R. I., Blakesley, V., & Walsh, B. T. (2008). The Sibutramine Binge Eating Disorder Research Group. Efficacy of sibutramine for the treatment of binge eating disorder: A randomized multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 51e58. Williams, S. H. (2005). Medications for treating alcohol dependence. American Family Physician, 72(9), 1775e1780. Winkelman, J. W., Herzog, D. B., & Fava, M. (1999). The prevalence of sleep-related eating disorder in psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations [Abstract]. Psychological Medicine, 29(6), 1461e1466. Wonderlich, S. A., Gordon, K. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crosby, R. D., & Engel, S. G. (2009). The validity and clinical utility of binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(8), 687e705. Yager, J. (2008). Binge eating disorder: The search for better treatments [Editorial]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165 (1), 4e6. Yasuhara, D., Nakahara, T., Harada, T., & Inui, A. (2007). Olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia in anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(3), 528e529.


C H A P T E R

8 Nutritional Impact on the Recovery Process Jillian K. Croll Eating disorders (ED) are not just about food and eating. A complex constellation of factors is implicated in their development and the recovery process. Nonetheless, the establishment or restoration of a positive, peaceful relationship with food and eating is essential for ED recovery. Currently, clinical experience, more than empirical research, informs the nutrition restoration process (Albers, 2003; Koenig, 2005; Satter, 2007; Tribole & Resch, 2003). Hence, the gap in the nutritional treatment of ED is not one of translating empirical findings into clinical practice, it is the paucity of research in this area. There is, however, a significant body of literature detailing the effects of nutritional intake that informs ED treatment in conjunction with practitioners’ clinical experience.

PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUTRITIONAL INTAKE Inadequate, imbalanced nutrition in ED can impact the entire physiological and psychological condition of the body. Food restriction contributes to potentially devastating physical consequences including amenorrhea, compromised bone health, nutrient deficiencies, and significant alteration of mood (Mitchell & Crow, 2006; Williams, Goodie & Motsinger, 2008; see also Tyson, Chapter 6). Inadequate intake may impair gut motility and inhibit appetite (Nakahara et al., 2008). Even in the face of adequate or excessive energy intake, unbalanced nutrient intake can have a significant impact. For example, patients with bulimia nervosa (BN) or binge eating disorder (BED) may take in sufficient calories, but, because of restrictive dietary rules, may consume few foods high in calcium, placing themselves at risk for bone related complications. The nutritional chaos and imbalance that comes with restricting, binging, purging, overeating, and/or weight cycling, can result in adverse physiological states, regardless of diagnosis (Mitchell & Crow, 2006; Williams et al., 2008). The landmark Minnesota Semi-Starvation Study extensively informed our knowledge of the physiological and psychological effects of undernutrition (Keys, Brozek, Henschel,


127


128

8. NUTRITIONAL IMPACT ON THE RECOVERY PROCESS

Mickelsen & Taylor, 1950). Maintaining the body’s metabolic engine, and the structure and integrity of tissues, requires proper intake of essential nutrients and adequate energy (Keys et al., 1950). Additionally, nutrition and eating behaviors impact how the body can handle physical and emotional stressors, operate known cognitive pathways, generate new cognitive processes, and manufacture and replenish biochemical and neurochemical modulators (Keys et al., 1950; Spinella & Lyke, 2004). Lastly, ED patients’ misuse of food and disordered eating interferes with the body’s intricate, natural hunger and satiety systems, in addition to compromising their abilities to emotionally and physiologically connect with these systems (Dalle Grave, Di Pauli, Sartirana, Calugi & Shafran, 2007; Geliebter, Yahav, Gluck & Hashim, 2004; Latner, Rosewall & Chisholm, 2008; Waters, Hill & Waller, 2001). These factors have distinct implications for the ED recovery process. The goals of nutritional restoration across the ED spectrum focus on achieving balanced, adequate, and fulfilling eating, while enabling patients to recognize and honor their internal hunger and fullness signals, and enhance their emotional well-being. This process requires great patience, creativity, and skill on the part of the nutrition practitioner, and hard work, risk-taking, and practice on the part of the recovering patient. It is best done in concert with a multidisciplinary team of ED specialists and the patient’s support system.

Effects of Unbalanced Nutrition on Cognitive Processes The impact of nutritional status on cognitive and emotional processes demonstrated by Keys et al. (1950) has crucially informed the field of ED. Basic knowledge of this study is critical knowledge for all ED clinicians. Briefly, 36 male subjects were selected from over 400 volunteers assessed to have the strongest mental and physical health (Keys et al., 1950). The year-long study involved an initial 3-month control period during which the men were fed adequate diets, a 6-month semi-starvation period during which each man was fed in a manner that induced a weight loss of approximately 25% of his body weight, a 3-month period of restricted rehabilitative feeding that restored weight and nutritional status at varying rates and with various nutrients, and a final 2-month period of unregulated nutritional restoration and rehabilitation during which participants could eat whatever and as much as they wished. In addition to the significant physical effects experienced by the participants during the semi-starvation phase, including decreased metabolic rate, decreased heart rate, slowed respirations, dizziness, hair loss, and lowered body temperature, participants reported dramatic changes in mood, cognition, comprehension, and judgment during both the semi-starvation phases and the rehabilitative phases. Some of the participants withdrew from academic courses because they felt unable to participate as the semi-starvation period progressed. Interestingly, standardized cognitive tests administered as part of data collection during this phase did not show diminished cognitive abilities. Participants reported that they experienced continued difficulties in cognition and judgment in the rehabilitative phases as well. One participant reported that the rehabilitative phase was even more difficult cognitively. Expecting to feel relief with refeeding, he was dismayed by continued obsessive thoughts of food even when the strict eating rules of the semi-starvation phase were lifted (Kalm & Semba, 2005). These 60-year-old accounts of the rapid and ill effects of semi-starvation on otherwise healthy research subjects sound tragically similar to those heard by contemporary clinicians


PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUTRITIONAL INTAKE

129

treating unwitting victims of ED. It is not uncommon in our ED practices to work with students needing to drop a course or a whole semester, or a sales executive suffering a drop in productivity, due to their inability to concentrate or complete the required work. Other data support these early findings of disturbances in brain functioning and dysregulated eating behaviors in ED. Complex brain imaging studies have described changes in ED patients in areas involved in the complex appetite, food regulatory, and impulse regulation systems (Frank, Bailer, Wagner, Henry & Kaye, 2004). Dietary restraint, disinhibited eating or overeating have also been associated with a decrease in decision-making and other cognitive capabilities (Spinella & Lyke, 2004). Stealing food and diet aids occurs at a higher incidence among ED patients than in the general population, and may be partially related to disturbances in cognitive functioning resulting from imbalanced nutritional status (Goldner, Geller, Birmingham & Remick, 2000). In addition to compromised cognitive abilities, Bailer and Kaye’s (2003) empirical review of neuropeptides involved in food regulatory systems, mood, and behavior modulation described alterations in neuropeptides across the spectrum of ED behaviors. This burgeoning body of research may provide some insight into ED behaviors. Since neuropeptides play an important role in appetite (the desire to eat) and hunger (the biological need to eat), alterations due to bingeing, purging, and/or restricting may contribute to the cyclical nature of ED behaviors. For example, in a patient with anorexia nervosa (AN) with low total calorie and protein intake, restrictive eating may lead to decreased neuropeptide production, compounds that are created from the amino acid building blocks of dietary proteins. This in turn could influence mood and appetite regulation. If this perturbation is experienced as decreased mood and dulled appetite signals, it may reinforce continued restriction. In a patient with BN, bingeing and purging may also lead to a disruption in neuropeptide levels, which could contribute to mood dysregulation and intensified hunger, setting someone up for the next binge/purge cycle. While some of these differences persist after recovery, many resolve with adequate, balanced nutrition (Bailer & Kaye, 2003). Significant interest is being directed to compulsive eating behaviors and the interaction between food intake, and cognitive features such as reward sensitivity, dopamine pathways, impulsivity, and decision-making (Davis & Carter, 2009; Munsch, Michael, Biedert, Meyer & Margraf, 2008). In their review of the concept of compulsive overeating as an addiction disorder, Davis and Carter (2009) suggested that compulsive overeating may be conceptualized as a unique interplay of a substance dependence (i.e., nutrients in the food) and a behavioral addiction (i.e., the activity of eating) that is both promoted and maintained by high reward sensitivity in the dopamine system. Their conceptualization lends itself to establishing treatment goals, including learning more helpful strategies around food consumption and emotion regulation. For example, patients experiencing anxiety, intense food cravings, and strong rewards from eating foods high in sugars and fats, may benefit from education about the brain’s dopamine reward system contributing to their experiences. This information can help them decide how and when to consume these foods. While the relationship between brain functioning and behavior is extraordinarily complex, it is clear that alterations in nutrition and eating patterns significantly impact concentration and judgment. Eating disorder behaviors can result in dramatic alterations in eating patterns and subsequently, nutritional intake. Normalizing eating patterns is a strong step towards resolving some of the cognitive effects of ED.


130


Effects of Unbalanced Nutrition on Emotional and Behavioral Processes Unbalanced nutritional intake can also severely impact psychological functioning. Similarly to ED patients, nearly all of the men in the Minnesota Starvation Study reported severe emotional distress and depression, and a dramatic obsession with all things foodrelated (Keys et al., 1950). Food preoccupations, including reading and collecting cookbooks and recipes, and eating rituals became commonplace, just as they frequently do among ED patients. Maladaptive behaviors around food arise when food intake is altered. A brain restricted from adequate nutrition, whether imposed by diet, famine, or ED, reacts by focusing thoughts and energy on food in hopes of motivating its procurement. Levels of emotional distress regarding these behaviors vary widely among patients. Distressed by the mere contemplation of grocery shopping, many report spending hours agonizing over which peanut butter, fruit snack, or bread to purchase that fits all their “ED requirements.” Some report feeling utterly detached from the experience of shopping, yet find themselves purchasing a range of items either to binge on or that fit within restrictive ED rules. Nutritional therapy interventions address planning and accomplishing less overwhelming shopping trips. Those who restrict food may chew multiple packs of gum each day, drink enormous amounts of water and diet soda, chew ice, or eat high volumes of very low energy density, high-fiber foods in an attempt to fill up and quell hunger pangs. Dietary restriction and the associated feelings of control may be experienced as rewarding by the patient (Dalle Grave et al., 2007; Shafran, Fairburn, Nelson & Robinson, 2003). Interventions must help patients learn more adaptive ways of experiencing control and empowerment. Patients struggling with bingeing describe trying to fill an endless void with food. During recovery, they discover that the void is actually related to emotional, not physical, hunger. Nutritional intervention for bingeing establishes regular eating patterns so that emotional hunger can be addressed in therapy. In the context of BN, this interrupts restricting and prolonged delays between meals, while in BED, this contributes to regulation of mood states. In sum, the impact of food intake on cognition, physiology, and emotional states is wide ranging and powerful, presenting clear opportunities for interventions that can yield marked changes. In order for ED to remit, eating must become an activity that is free of dread, anxiety, and determined alteration, and distinguished by self-care, flexibility, and positive coping.

FINDING NUTRITIONAL BALANCE: NUTRITIONAL REHABILITATION Nutritional rehabilitation is a dynamic process that proceeds in stages. Typically, this entails progressing from symptom interruption with a highly structured eating plan, to teaching a more intuitive, mindful way of eating, and ultimately, to the patient mastering self-regulated eating connected to the body’s cues of hunger and satiety. Instruction and direction through these stages is done in conjunction with teaching alternative coping skills. Recovered patients describe the changes in their thoughts about food as moving from irrational, dominant, fearful, compulsive thoughts, to thoughts of flexibility, openness, acceptance, exploration, and freedom (Bjo¨rk & Ahlstro¨m, 2008). The actions and behaviors that


FINDING NUTRITIONAL BALANCE: NUTRITIONAL REHABILITATION

131

go along with these cognitive shifts include: eating a wide range of foods and eating regularly; eating without fear or limitations based on the feared effects of the food; eating comfortably with others; and eating in response to the body’s natural signals. Thus, this new “healthy” relationship to food involves the body and mind operating in concert, rather than in internal conflict.

Duration of Nutritional Rehabilitation Recovery takes copious amounts of time, practice, and patience on the part of patients and their supporters. These dramatic changes in thoughts and orientation to food rarely occur in a linear fashion. Even in the case of the imposed undernutrition of healthy men, as demonstrated in the Minnesota Semi-Starvation study (Keys et al., 1950), rehabilitation is protracted and challenging. Many of the men reported that the rehabilitation period was the most difficult part of the study, as the intense effects of food restriction lingered well after the reintroduction of adequate nutrition (Kalm & Semba, 2005; Keys et al., 1950). Subjects reported that it took from 2 to 24 months after the 5 month nutritional rehabilitation to feel fully recovered from the experience (Kalm & Semba, 2005). Similarly, research examining time to ED recovery report durations of 3 to 5 years or longer (Grilo et al., 2007; van Son, van Hoeken, van Furth, Donker & Hoek, 2010). The length, structure, and path of the nutritional rehabilitation process depends a great deal on the specific struggles of the patient, the ED behaviors in question, the available supports (e.g., access to specialized treatment; financial resources; involvement of family, friends, co-workers), and the internal motivation of the patient.

Interrupting Symptom Use For patients with low body weights, initial nutritional rehabilitation is more prescriptive and directed in an effort to restore well-being and weight, so that they are more physically equipped to make decisions, develop new coping skills, and handle the psychological work involved in the process of treatment and recovery (American Dietetic Association, 2006; Cockfield & Philpot, 2009). The early phase of refeeding focuses on the intake of nutrients and energy in a regulated and adequate manner. Prevention of possible medical complications of increased food intake is critical (Tresley & Sheehan, 2008; see also Tyson, Chapter 6). Refeeding syndrome can occur when food intake, particularly carbohydrate, is increased too dramatically, leading to a sudden rise in insulin production and movement of phosphate, magnesium, and potassium into cells. Low blood concentrations of these nutrients involved in muscle contraction, together with fluid overload from decreased water and sodium excretion in the face of the energy influx, can lead to cardiac complications and death (Tresley & Sheehan, 2008). Because of these risks, caloric increases are done gradually and systematically with close medical monitoring of labs and vital signs. Early fullness is a common complaint among patients with AN, likely due to a combination of gastric slowing, appetite hormone dysregulation, and anxiety with eating (Cockfield & Philpot, 2009; Nakahara et al., 2008). This uncomfortable experience can be managed proactively with education and suggestions of creative solutions for lower volume, energy dense foods, and liquids (Cockfield & Philpot, 2009). For example, one alternative is a meal of 3 ounces of chicken, 1 cup of brown rice with butter, 1 cup of salad with dressing, 1 cup of


132


berries, 1 cup of skim milk, and a slice of chocolate cake. However, a meal of chicken and vegetable stew, a biscuit with butter, and a milkshake with 1 banana, 3/4 cup of whole milk, and 1 cup of premium ice cream accomplishes delivery of similar calories and nutrients in a lower volume of food. For patients struggling with chaotic, compulsive, and/or out of control eating behaviors, with or without purging, bringing structure to eating is critical to interrupting symptoms. Establishment of regular meals and snacks focused on adequate, balanced energy and nutrient intake brings a sense of predictability and regularity to eating that can help prevent or mitigate dramatic swings in hunger and satiety, improve cognitive processes by decreasing obsession with food, and minimize symptom use (American Dietetic Association, 2006). Patients’ participation in food choices varies depending on the treatment setting. Clinically, some patients are not initially well-equipped to make choices most supportive of their health, and will need more guidance. Others are able and eager to be more involved in food selection, even when quite compromised. Clinical skill, empathy, and flexibility are key components of navigating this early stage of rehabilitation in a way that allows the patient to feel heard, supported, respected, and involved. Eating plans. As noted, the early stages of nutritional rehabilitation involve providing guidance on establishing regular patterns of eating. These recommendations range from having three meals and two to three snacks per day, going no more than four hours between eating episodes, and no skipping meals (Fairburn, 2008), to a detailed meal plan that offers guidance on the types and amounts of food to be eaten at each meal and snack. The latter approach is common in many practice settings. The overall emphasis is on eating meals and snacks regularly throughout the day, in adequate amounts, comprised of foods that will provide nourishment appropriate to the undernourished or nutritionally unbalanced state of the patient. Simply put, but not easily done, the job of the patient is to try to eat according to the established guidelines. The structure of a meal plan contributes a sense of order, accountability, acceptability, and nutritional adequacy to eating. Often broadly based on food groups (protein, calcium-rich foods, grains, vegetables, fruits, fats, desserts, and other), the meal plan will illustrate how much of each food group is recommended and how these amounts could be distributed across three meals and multiple snacks. The “other” category may include supplementary foods, such as drinks, bars, and powders that are condensed energy sources for those patients needing to consume a larger amount of energy for weight restoration. Table 8.1 illustrates an example of a weight restoration meal plan with menu ideas incorporating supplementary foods and ways to reduce volume when possible. All foods can be accommodated, although certain ones considered too initially overwhelming can be reintroduced more slowly over time. For example, patients struggling with restricting and strong food fears may have to start with low amounts of fats and work to add additional servings over time. Patients struggling with bingeing and purging may need to pay particular attention to eating meals and snacks that include a mixture of carbohydrate, fats, and proteins, rather than primarily carbohydrate, to help the meal be more physiologically satisfying and to prevent bingeing resulting from inadequate intake. For patients trying to decrease binge eating, common binge foods, such as desserts high in carbohydrate and fat, may need to be briefly avoided to allow for normalized eating before being reintegrated later in the recovery process. Patients may experience the meal plan as a relieving


133


TABLE 8.1

Sample Weight Restoration Meal

Serving Size

Food Group

Breakfast

1 oz meat, fish, poultry; 1 egg, 1 oz cheese; 1TBSP peanut butter; 3 oz tofu; 1 oz nuts

Protein

2 scrambled eggs

2 slices cheese/meat pizza (3 oz protein in 2 slices)

1 cup milk, soy milk, or yogurt; 1 oz cheese

Dairy

1 oz cheese

8 oz milk

1 cup yogurt

1 slice bread, 1 cup flake cereal, ½ cup dense cold cereal; ½ cup hot cereal; ½ cup rice, pasta, potato; small tortilla; 4–6 crackers; ½ bagel, bun ½ cup cooked; 1 cup raw; 4 fl oz veg juice

Grain

2 small tortillas

Crust of pizza

½ cup 1 cup oven granola roasted cereal potato cubes; 1 bun

1 medium piece; ½ cup canned; 1 cup fresh; 4 oz juice; ¼ cup dried fruit

Fruit

1 cup strawberries

4 fl oz orange juice

1 tsp butter, margarine, cream cheese; 1 tbsp regular mayo, salad dressing, whipped butter or margarine; 2 tbsp light dressing or mayo; ½ oz nuts 1 medium slice cake, pie, brownie; regular size candy bar; 2–3 homemade cookies; 3– 4 sandwich cookies; 1 cup ice cream, pudding

Fat

2 tbsp sour cream on breakfast burritos

2 tbsp cream cheese on bagel

Powder addition to milk; sports bar, drink, or shake mix; liquid supplement

Other (energy dense options for extra kcal)

Snack

1 bagel

Veg

Dessert

Lunch

Snack

Dinner

Total number of exchanges 9

8 oz milk with instant breakfast powder

6

3 oz hamburger with 1 oz cheese 8 oz milk

11

1 cup steamed broccoli

2 cups mixed greens ½ cup canned fruit 1 tbsp dressing on salad; ½ oz nuts on salad

Snack

1 tsp olive oil on potatoes

Medium brownie

4

1 large banana

5

1 tbsp peanut butter

7

1 cup premium ice cream

1–2 per day

Make shake with peanut butter, ice cream, banana, milk, and breakfast powder

sort of “permission to eat normally.” The meal plan and its structure may also function as a way to move ahead from a less successful day. A wise patient once said that her meal plan helped her to remind her: “No matter how bad yesterday was, always eat breakfast.”


134


The meal plan is not intended to be a maximum amount of food that can be eaten in a day, nor should it be rigid or inflexible. It should be designed with the patient’s ED symptoms, height, weight, gender, activity, and energy needs in mind and planned in a manner that increases the likelihood of the patient’s success. For example, some patients find it easier and prefer to consume more energy earlier in the day. Others find it significantly more challenging to start the day with a large meal, and will find it more manageable to break it into multiple smaller meals across the morning. Other factors to consider may include time, finances, cooking ability, and living situation. Thus, this process is ideally personalized and the plan is revised over time to meet the patient’s changing needs. Self-monitoring. Frequently, self-monitoring of food consumption and symptom use is recommended in conjunction with the meal plan. Self-monitoring, a cornerstone of cognitive behavioral treatment (Fairburn, 2008), can be a partner to the meal plan, helping patients compare how their eating for the day matches the intended structure and content. As shown in Figure 8.1, the food log details food eaten, amount, time, place, thoughts, emotional state, and symptom use. Reviewing a self-monitoring log can help clarify when and which components of the meal plan are missing or in excess, how symptoms interplay with food intake, and what emotional states are associated with presence or absence of symptom use. Willingness and interest regarding completing self-monitoring logs varies across patients and is likely dependent on motivation for recovery and on symptom patterns. Self-monitoring might be more acceptable to patients in active stages of change (Nichols & Gusella, 2003). These patients typically find self-monitoring to be a helpful, insightful means to behavior change. Food logs may show how irregular eating with long periods between meals lead to episodes of bingeing and purging. When experiences regarding emotions and binge eating can be clearly linked, emotional triggers, and strategies for self-soothing and increasing emotional tolerance can be addressed. Among patients less motivated for change, self-monitoring may feel like more of a chore than a tool. They may feel so emotionally detached that they have difficulty even naming feelings that arise in relation to food and symptom use. In these situations, simply recording food intake and symptom use may be all they are able to do. Discussion of the logs in session may help them become more aware of connections between emotions and eating behaviors, or long gaps between meals, and ravenous hunger later or even the next day. Shame may also interfere with a patient’s ability or willingness to complete selfmonitoring logs, given that it can be a core struggle that affects eating behaviors, thoughts, and attitudes (Goss & Allan, 2009). For those patients who experience significant shame in relation to eating in general or to symptom use, self-monitoring can be a powerfully negative experience that keeps them stuck, rather than a tool to enhance self-awareness of behavior. In these situations, it may be prudent to avoid food logs, at least initially, and work closely with the therapist to help the patient identify alternatives to symptom use. In addition to these emotional obstacles to self-monitoring, other barriers must be explored as well. When asked to self-monitor, patients will often say: “I don’t want people to see me doing that,” or “I don’t want to carry something like that with me; I might lose it.” Patients should be encouraged to complete self-monitoring records as thoroughly, beneficially, and realistically as possible. Logs may be handwritten or completed electronically, in a journal formatdany manner that works best for the patient. One family devised a system of colored chips in which each color represented a serving of a particular food group. Once the


135


Food Record and Hunger Ratings DATE: ________________________________ Time

Item Eaten

Amount

PR

GR

VG

FR

FT

ML

DS

Other

Hunger/ Fullness (see scale below)

Symptoms (binge, purge, diet pill, laxative, restrict, other)

Activity (type, length, intensity)

Thoughts/ Feelings

Intake Goal PR: Protein; GR: Grain; VG: Vegetable; FR: Fruit; FT: Fat; ML: Dairy; DS: Dessert. Hunger/Fullness Scale: 0=extremely hungry, 1=very hungry, 2=quite hungry, 3=fairly hungry, 4=getting hungry, 5=neither full nor hungry, 6=getting full, 7=fairly full, 8=quite full, 9=very full, 10=extremely full.

FIGURE 8.1 Sample Food Record with Hunger and Satiety Ratings

adolescent consumed a meal or snack, a chip for each serving was moved from the “to have” to the “had” jar, with the goal being an empty “to have” jar at the end of the day. A quick glance was all that was needed for the parents to assess how the day was going. Meal plan duration. The meal plan should be conceptualized from the beginning as a temporary tool used to navigate the process to mindful, nurturing, self-regulated eating, much as a map is a temporary tool used to navigate trips to new destinations. Properly and attentively used, both the map and the meal plan eventually become unnecessary. The timing of meals and snacks, and the amounts of food that are outlined in the meal plan, are intended to become internalized and matched with patient’s internal signals of hunger and satiety. Ideally, their acquired knowledge and competence with food, used in conjunction with this inner compass, becomes their guide to eating.

On-going Nutritional Rehabilitation The middle phase of nutritional restoration is marked by practice, experimentation, and repeated attempts to reincorporate previously feared foods, and previously avoided foodrelated situations. In this phase, the goal is change rather than compliance. This approach is not linear; but a process of back pedaling or side stepping intermit with forward motion.


136


With progression, physical health complications of unbalanced nutrition resolve, cognition and focus improve, and obsessions and compulsions with food begin to shift. The main focus of the nutrition-related work in this phase is reincorporation of regular, normal eating with the goal of developing a mindful or intuitive nutritional relationship with one’s body. Once structured eating is mastered, awareness of hunger and satiety cues, flexibility, and balance become the key factors in nutritional rehabilitation. Hunger and satiety. Research in hunger, satiety, appetite, and food intake regulation continues to inform the process of improving dysfunctional eating patterns (Hetherington & Rolls, 2001). An explanation of the concepts of hunger, satiety, and appetite can aid patients in attending to internal signals. Hunger, the biological need for food, may be expressed by a growling stomach, a headache, fatigue, or distractedness. If ignored, it will likely disappear, only to reappear later in a different form such as stronger fatigue, emotional disconnectedness, cognitive impairment, or thirst. Satiety may be a quiet fullness, a feeling of calm, a slight decrease in the palatability of the food being eaten, a sensation in the belly. Appetite, or desire for food with or without hunger, may be experienced as an insatiable, frightening state, because emotional appetites can be confused with physical, food-related appetites. Perception of hunger, satiety, and appetite cues are typically so significantly impacted by ED behaviors that a substantial portion of nutritional rehabilitation work is done around understanding, recognizing, and reconnecting with the intricate internal signals related to food intake. Monitoring hunger and satiety. When monitoring logs include ratings of hunger and satiety, patients can learn to discern and understand how symptoms interact with these cues. As in the example shown in Table 8.1, hunger and satiety rating scales often range from 1 to 10, with 1¼extremely hungry and 10¼extremely full. In order to avoid getting too hungry and being at risk for overeating, it is helpful to encourage eating prior to reaching a 3 or 4 on the hunger scale. Similarly, in order to prevent or recognize overeating, patients are encouraged to stop eating prior to reaching 8 or 9. Eating disorder symptoms can interfere with attempts to respond to hunger and fullness in the middle area of the range, and draw patients to the extremes of the range of hunger and fullness. Flexibility. A patient who has mastered eating regular meals and snacks from an expanded realm of food choices, and has begun understanding hunger/satiety cues, has significantly progressed in nutritional recovery. The next step is developing flexibility (Satter, 2007). Once a difficult eating related task is mastered, expanding the boundaries of comfort and competence can be a challenging process. For example, a patient’s meal plan is structured such that breakfast involves the following servings: two grains, a fruit, a fat, and a calcium food. The patient has gradually become comfortable with this breakfast, typically having a bowl of cereal or oatmeal with milk and fruit and a slice of toast with peanut butter. While these foods well represent what the meal plan outlines, it is rarely varied. However straightforward it seems to have something else for breakfast, it may have taken the patient months to comfortably incorporate an adequate fat serving or second grain serving. Most likely, great progress was made to consume this entire breakfast, building up from one small apple, or in lieu of an hour-long binge and purge session. Alterations in the patient’s schedule due to work, traveling, social events, etc., are inevitable. Formulating plans in advance allows the patient to be more prepared and flexible



137

when situations demand it. A number of typical meal scenarios can be planned in session and practiced in familiar surroundings, so that once in the actual situation, the patient feels more confident and calm. This type of practice expands patient’s eating competence, developing their flexibility with an array of food possibilities and circumstances (Satter, 2007). Off-limits foods and challenging situations. Often, across all types of EDs, certain foods are abandoned due to fear, misinformed nutritional beliefs, or their potential for symptom triggering. Patients are best assisted by discussing their concerns, thoughts, and/or beliefs about these foods, and distinguishing between nutritional myths and truths. It is also important to understand the situations in which these foods were typically eaten, how that became problematic, and how the patient would like to consume them in recovery. Reincorporation of these foods utilizing an internally motivated regulation of food intake, as opposed to cognitively or externally regulated eating, promotes health, well-being, and balance (Kratina, 2003). For example, a patient decides that she would like to reincorporate pizza, a previously favorite food typically eaten out with friends. Formulating this plan in stages is most helpful. The first stage might involve having pizza in a nonpublic private setting that is familiar, safe, and supportive. This helps to minimize her anxiety, and to experience how pizza can fit into normal, healthy eating. Once this has been successfully accomplished, the next step may be going out for pizza with safe, supportive others. The patient is encouraged to choose the kind of pizza truly desired. Being in public adds the element of the outside world to the experience, which, depending on the person, may increase anxiety or may be calming by adding a sense of normalcy. The last step would be to have pizza out, with friends, as she did prior to her ED. Having two or more previous experiences focused on reintegrating pizza into her diet, the combination of the previously feared food and the social situation is less overwhelming than it would have been otherwise. As illustrated, with practice, support, and successive approximation to the ultimate goal, an array of foods can be reclaimed and reintegrated into the patient’s routine intake. Life events, such as wedding, graduations, traveling, holidays, new jobs, relationships, schedules, or other significant occasions offer real-life opportunities to practice new ways of interacting with food. Acclimating to these situations may require trial and error until the patient feels confident with multiple food related activities. Common occurrences also become manageable. For example, with planning and practice, the previous ordeal of grocery shopping involving copious label reading and few food purchases may shift to a shorter, less label-bound, more tolerable event involving moderate amounts of food purchasing. Teaching cooking skills may also be necessary. This can be done in a group, ideally in an actual kitchen with hands-on food preparation, or individually in the office if no facilities are accessible. Cookbooks of quick, easy meals can be helpful teaching tools. Eventually, these can become normal life responsibilities that stir up minimal emotional turmoil, and yield a navigable kitchen stocked with adequate, nourishing foods. Shift away from structure and monitoring. Inevitably, at some point in the treatment process, patients will ask: “How long will I be on this meal plan?” “How long do I have to do these food records?” “Do ‘normal’ people follow meal plans?” or “How do ‘normal’ people feel when they are full?” These are typically signs that they may be ready to make the transition away from structure. Conversely, other patients may cling to it, stating: “As long as I follow my meal plan or write down my food, I do okay,” or “How will I know


138


how to eat if I don’t have my meal plan?” When and how quickly to shift away from the meal plan and self-monitoring process is dependent on numerous factors, including treatment setting, motivation, and health status. At times, patients may need gentle, compassionate prodding to loosen their grip on the meal plan or food record tools. These can become too comfortable in a way that precludes patients from expanding their food repertoire or keeps them too tightly tied to a structure that continues to limit normal flexibility with eating. It may be necessary to provide safe challenges to help them expand their latitude with eating. One challenge is to have patients not look at the meal plan or complete food records for a few days, and then describe in a session how this impacted what they ate and how they felt. Letting go of the meal plan may have been anxiety producing or freeing. They may notice that not recording intake changes thoughts about the structure of eating, e.g., “If I don’t have to write things down, then I’m not going to eat it!” or “I liked not having to write things down; I felt more normal.” These observations, and possible changes in behavior, are gauges of a patient’s readiness to transition to less structure. Another goal for those slower to relinquish reliance on external tools is to guide eating with internal hunger and fullness cues without relying on the meal plan for a day or more. This may or may not still include written self-monitoring. If hunger and fullness cues are still difficult for the patient to discern, this type of experiment can be helpful in steadily strengthening those skills. Generally, these prompts encourage the patient to push beyond a safe set of foods or settings to try more challenging situations or foods, observe how it went, and report back with successes and areas for continued practice. The internal compass. Novel or re-engaged competence with life skills involving food and eating is critical to replacing ED symptoms with positive, self-care behaviors. A new type of map is in order: the internal compass. Internally directed and regulated eating is described as mindful eating (Albers, 2003; Smith, Shelley, Leahigh & Vanleit, 2006), intuitive eating (Tribole & Resch, 2003), normal eating (Koenig, 2005), and competent eating (Satter, 2007). External factors may still impact the internal compass, such as food availability, resources, time, facilities, presence or absence of others, and situation. While these external factors may influence what and how much food is available, they do not have to unduly influence which and how much food is eaten, when eating begins and ceases, or the state of mind experienced by the patient at the time of eating. In practice, patients often question this part of recovery, doubting that they can eat in this internally regulated manner. Reassurance that it is possible helps them stay the course. A common theme among recovered patients is that they now possess the ability to eat whatever is wanted, without avoiding foods based on calorie or fat content, and without focusing on externally regulated portions or cues (Bjo¨rk & Ahlstro¨m, 2008). Developing skills around emotional recognition and regulation and stress management is essential, as they allow the patient to forego ED behaviors to deal with life events, thoughts, and feelings. It is important to remember that eating behaviors are not only connected to negative emotions, but positive emotions as well (Dingemans, Martijn, van Furth & Jansen, 2009). For example, birthday parties or other celebrations can result in binge eating even though the patient is happy and having fun, if they fail to follow internal hunger and satiety signals. Turning up the volume on internal regulation. Strengthening internal regulation of eating begins by listening to and observing thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations in



139

relationship to food, eating, and the body. Clinically, ED patients often express an inability to relax and may be resistant when asked to develop mindfulness skills that request observation of the body’s feelings (Douglass, 2009). Despite feeling like they “can’t do it,” research shows that mindfulness can be learned, developed, and cultivated as a skill and tool even among more highly anxious patients (Shapiro, Oman, Thoresen, Plante & Flinders, 2008; see also McCallum, Chapter 23). Extending these skills to eating practices is encouraged. Indeed, programs designed for the general public to develop or enhance mindfulness typically include a mindful eating component (Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Shapiro et al., 2008). By exploring and observing (i.e., being mindful of) and coming to understand their own sensations of hunger, satiety, and desires for particular foods or aversions to others, patients can start to hear more of their body’s signals regarding food intake. Learning the language of internal signals makes reading the messages possible.

The End of the Journey The final stage of nutritional rehabilitation is focused on maintaining internally regulated, mindful eating skills with attention to any specific nutritional needs. For example, a patient recovering from AN may have high calcium and vitamin D needs to address compromised bone health. A patient with BED can practice mindful eating and also be attentive to cholesterol and saturated fat intake to address heart disease risk. Research demonstrates that internally regulated eating leads to health improvements, in lieu of restrictive dieting (Bacon, Stern, Van Loan & Keim, 2005; Hawley et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2006). Body acceptance and self-care in conjunction with internally regulated eating become the focus of life in recovery mode (Bjo¨rk & Ahlstro¨m, 2008). Letting go. The process of normalizing food intake and ED recovery requires the patient to let go of perfectionistic ED rules and structure in favor of bodily connection. In practice, patients working on detangling from their ED sometimes struggle with having to “do recovery perfectly” or in some “right” way. This particularly includes the manner in which they eat, the foods eaten, and the acceptability of and satisfaction with these foods. In their exacting ED world, foods need to be “just right, just what they wanted, cooked just right, presented just right, and enjoyed in just the right manner.” Patients must recognize and move through this struggle with “food perfectionism.” Eating and food experiences are not perfect; in fact, they are highly variable. They can be wonderful, boring, messy, predictable, surprising, satisfying, disappointing, tasty, bland, exciting, or unmemorable. As patients allow themselves to experience this full range of possibilities, and become more mindful of their responses to situations, they are better able to let go of dissatisfying eating. If a meal or snack proves disappointing, their perfectionistic food orientation bears reminding them that there will be opportunities for satisfaction the next time. Mindful eating in a less than mindful world. Flexibility with food and eating, accepting and cooperating with the body, and allowing for a more peaceful relationship with weight, are characteristics of recovered patients (Bjo¨rk & Ahlstro¨m, 2008). In many ways, however, the sociocultural environment does not support mindful, joyful, internally regulated eating. Patients developing competence with internal regulation skills may feel counter-cultural, as if they have skills not possessed by most people. This feeling may be quite accurate, as


140


internally guided eating is sadly lacking today, but can be learned (Satter, 2007). Despite lack of support for internally regulated eating in the culture, patients must continue to develop skills in this area to flourish in recovery. The tenants of recovery eating. This approach to eating, regardless of context, is summarized by the following principles: 1. Begin eating in sync with hunger, satiety, and appetite cues rather than in response to emotional state, external motivators, or fear. 2. Choose foods based on internal cues, desires about what is really wanted, and with consideration of availability. 3. Experience eating as it is happening. 4. Stop eating in accordance with hunger, satiety, and appetite cues. 5. Reflect on the degree of satisfaction with the experience to inform future eating choices and opportunities. 6. Honor your right to listen to your body and allow your internal compass and wisdom to guide you.

CLOSING THE RESEARCH/PRACTICE GAP IN THE NUTRITIONAL TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS While a gap remains in ED research examining specific nutritional interventions, clinical experience across disciplines highlights the importance of including a nutrition professional on the treatment team. The dietitian plays an integral role in ED recovery by aiding patients in establishing positive, internally guided approaches to eating while working with other team members on the physical, psychological, and spiritual components of their recovery. Ongoing communication and consultation between providers regarding patients’ successes and challenges is critical for their progress and the team’s effectiveness. Empirical research is needed to both support and innovate specific nutritional interventions in ED treatment. The dietitian is often at odds with patients at the beginning of treatment, facing the force of their resistance to weight gain or symptom interruption. Over time, this typically dissipates and develops into a strong, trusting relationship that helps patients expand their eating repertoire. Given the dearth of ED nutrition research, qualitative research focused on the patient’s and dietitian’s experiences throughout the course of treatment would add critical information regarding the process and outcomes of nutritional treatment. Additionally, increased ED nutrition intervention research can serve to support improved insurance coverage of nutrition services; a challenging financial issue faced by many patients. Clinicians new to the ED field are advised to thoroughly immerse themselves in ED nutrition therapy resources, as well as the related psychological treatment literature. Typical academic nutrition training will equip new dietitians with robust clinical nutrition skills, but not necessarily the therapeutic and counseling skills required to effectively navigate the psychological nuances of ED treatment. Mentorship with an experienced ED dietitian or psychotherapist can be invaluable in developing competency in the field. The effort is


CLOSING THE RESEARCH/PRACTICE GAP IN THE NUTRITIONAL TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS

141

worth it; helping patients to achieve freedom from the tyranny of food and experience joy in life is extremely fulfilling.

References American Dietetic Association. (2006). Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition intervention in the treatment of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and other eating disorders. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106, 2073e2082. Albers, S. (2003). Eating mindfully. How to end mindless eating and enjoy a balanced relationship with food. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. Bacon, L., Stern, J., Van Loan, M., & Keim, N. (2005). Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, female chronic dieters. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 929e936. Bailer, U. F., & Kaye, W. H. (2003). A review of neuropeptide and neuroendocrine dysregulation in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Current Drug Targets: CNS and Neurological Disorders, 2, 53e60. Bjo¨rk, T., & Ahlstro¨m, G. (2008). The patient’s perception of having recovered from an eating disorder. Health Care for Women International, 29, 926e944. Cockfield, A., & Philpot, U. (2009). Feeding size O: The challenges of anorexia nervosa. Managing anorexia from a dietitian’s perspective. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 68, 281e288. Dalle Grave, R., Di Pauli, D., Sartirana, M., Calugi, S., & Shafran, R. (2007). The interpretation of symptoms of starvation/severe dietary restraint in eating disorder patients. Eating and Weight Disorders, 12, 108e113. Davis, C., & Carter, J. (2009). Compulsive overeating as an addiction disorder. A review of theory and evidence. Appetite, 53, 1e8. Dingemans, E., Martijn, C., van Furth, E., & Jansen, A. (2009). Expectations, mood, and eating behavior in binge eating disorder. Beware of the bright side. Appetite, 53, 166e173. Douglass, L. (2009). Yoga as an intervention in the treatment of eating disorders: Does it work? Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 17, 126e139. Fairburn, C. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Frank, G. K., Bailer, U. F., Wagner, A., Henry, S., & Kaye, W. H. (2004). Neuroimaging studies in eating disorders. CNS Spectrums, 9, 539e548. Geliebter, A., Yahav, E. K., Gluck, M. E., & Hashim, S. A. (2004). Gastric capacity, test meal intake, and appetitive hormones in binge eating disorder. Physiology & Behavior, 81, 735e740. Goldner, E. M., Geller, J., Birmingham, L., & Remick, R. (2000). Comparison of shoplifting behaviors in patients with eating disorders, psychiatric control subjects, and undergraduate control subjects. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 71e475. Goss, K., & Allan, S. (2009). Shame, pride and eating disorders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16, 303e316. Grilo, C., Pagano, M., Skodo, A., Sanislow, C., McGlashan, T., Gunderson, J., & Stout, R. (2007). Natural course of bulimia nervosa and of eating disorder not otherwise specified: 5-Year prospective study of remissions, relapses, and the effects of personality disorder psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 738e746. Hawley, G., Horwath, C., Gray, A., Bradshaw, A., Katzer, L., Joyce, J., & O‘Brien, S. (2008). Sustainability of health and lifestyle improvements following a non-dieting randomized trial in overweight women. Preventive Medicine, 47, 593e599. Hetherington, M., & Rolls, B. (2001). Dysfunctional eating in the eating disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 235e248. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Dell Publishing. Kalm, L. M., & Semba, R. D. (2005). They starved so that others be better fed: Remembering Ancel Keys and the Minnesota experiment. Journal of Nutrition, 135, 1347e1352. Keys, A., Brozek, J., Henschel, A., Mickelsen, O., & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The biology of human starvation (2 volumes). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Koenig, K. (2005). The rules of "normal" eating: A commonsense approach for dieters, overeaters, undereaters, emotional eaters, and everyone in between. Carslbad, CA: Gurze Books. Kratina, K. (2003). Health at every size: Clinical applications. Healthy Weight Journal, 17, 19e23.


142


Latner, J. D., Rosewall, J. K., & Chisholm, A. M. (2008). Energy density effects on food intake, appetite ratings, and loss of control in women with binge eating disorder and weight-matched controls. Eating Behaviors, 9, 257e266. Mitchell, J., & Crow, S. (2006). Medical complications of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 19, 438e443. Munsch, S., Michael, T., Biedert, E., Meyer, A. H., & Margraf, J. (2008). Negative mood induction and unbalanced nutrition style as possible triggers of binges in binge eating disorder. Eating and Weight Disorders, 13, 22e29. Nakahara, T., Harada, T., Yasuhara, D., Shimada, N., Amitani, H., Sakoguchi, T., . Invi, A. (2008). Plasma obestatin concentrations are negatively correlated with body mass index, insulin resistance index, and plasma leptin concentrations in obesity and anorexia nervosa. Biological Psychiatry, 64, 252e255. Nichols, S., & Gusella, J. (2003). Food for thought: Will adolescent girls with eating disorders self-monitor in a CBT group? Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review, 12, 37e39. Satter, E. (2007). Eating competence: Definition and evidence for the Satter Eating Competence Model. Journal of Nutrition Education, 39, S142eS153. Shafran, R., Fairburn, C. G., Nelson, L., & Robinson, P. H. (2003). The interpretation of symptoms of severe dietary restraint. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 887e894. Shapiro, S., Oman, D., Thoresen, C., Plante, T., & Flinders, T. (2008). Cultivating mindfulness: Effects on well-being. Clinical Psychology, 64, 840e862. Smith, B., Shelley, B., Leahigh, L., & Vanleit, B. (2006). A preliminary study of the effects of a modified mindfulness intervention on binge eating. Complementary Health Practice Review, 11, 133e143. Spinella, M., & Lyke, J. (2004). Executive personality traits and eating behavior. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114, 83e93. Tresley, J., & Sheehan, P. M. (2008). Refeeding syndrome: Recognition is the key to prevention and management. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108, 2105e2108. Tribole, E., & Resch, E. (2003). Intuitive eating: A revolutionary program that works (2nd ed.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin. van Son, G. E., van Hoeken, D., van Furth, E. F., Donker, G. A., & Hoek, H. W. (2010). Course and outcome of eating disorders in a primary care-based cohort. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(2), 130e138. Waters, A., Hill, A., & Waller, G. (2001). Bulimics’ responses to food cravings: Is binge-eating a product of emotional hunger or emotional state? Behavior Research and Therapy, 39, 877e886. Williams, P., Goodie, J., & Motsinger, C. (2008). Treating eating disorders in primary care. American Family Physician, 77, 187e195.


C H A P T E R

9 Science or Art? Integrating Symptom Management into Psychodynamic Treatment of Eating Disorders Nancy L. Cloak and Pauline S. Powers .what we call their symptoms they call their salvation (Boris, 1984)

INTRODUCTION As one veteran clinician in the field succinctly observed, “Treating eating disorders is not for the faint of heart” (Zerbe, personal communication, April, 2009). Not only are the eating disorder symptoms themselves frequently intransigent and ego-syntonic, but most patientsd90% in one naturalistic study (Thompson-Brenner & Westen, 2005a)dsuffer from co-morbid psychiatric disorders that complicate management and impede recovery (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope & Kessler, 2007). Although many researchers advocate the use of manual-based treatments that have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials, both clinical experience and an increasing number of outcome studies indicate that while these treatments often produce symptomatic improvement, they rarely lead to full recovery. For example, while Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is considered the evidence-based treatment of choice for bulimia nervosa, only seven of 43 outcome measures in 15 trials of CBT showed that patients’ post-treatment binge-purge frequency or Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) scores were equivalent to those of a normal sample (Lundgren, Danoff-Burg & Anderson, 2004). In another analysis of 19 studies, purge abstinence rate after CBT ranged from only 35 to 55% (Richards et al., 2000). For anorexia nervosa (AN), evidence-based treatment is essentially non-existent at this time. Other than family therapy for younger adolescents, there is little evidence to support any specific intervention for anorexia (Bulik, Berkman & Brownley, 2007); time to recovery is protracted (Strober, Freeman, & Morell, 1997) and less than half of patients are described as recovered at long-term follow-up (Steinhausen, 2002). Additional research on interventions for eating disorders is urgently needed but, in the interim, clinicians must find ways to treat their patients effectively.


143


144

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

A common approach is to use a mixture of interventions, and this is supported by treatment guidelines, especially for AN (Work Group on Eating Disorders, 2006). Given the tenacity of the symptoms, substantial co-morbidity, and limitations of evidence-based treatments, it is not surprising that most therapists identify something other than CBT as their primary approach to treatment (Simmons, Milnes & Anderson, 2008). A substantial minority of these clinicians describe themselves as primarily psychodynamic in orientation (Thompson-Brenner & Westen, 2005b) and there is a large body of literature about psychodynamic approaches to treating eating disorders. While psychodynamic psychotherapy is sometimes dismissed as not being evidence-based, a growing body of sophisticated research supports its effectiveness in a broad range of psychiatric conditions (Knekt et al., 2008; Leichsenring, Rabung & Leibing, 2004; Leichsenring & Leibing, 2007). In populations with chronicity and complex co-morbidity, long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy is significantly superior to shorter-term methods of psychotherapy with regard to overall outcome, target problems, and personality functioning (Leichsenring & Rabung, 2008). Furthermore, psychodynamic therapy has been effective in a number of controlled studies of eating disorder patients, with short-term outcomes equivalent to CBT in studies where the comparison was made (Bachar, Latzer, Kreitler & Berry, 1999; Dare, Eisler, Russell, Treasure & Dodge, 2001; Garner et al., 1993; Treasure et al., 1995). Thus, a long clinical tradition combines with more recent outcomes literature to provide a solid evidence base for using a psychodynamic approach to the treatment of eating disorders. However, there are some difficulties inherent in using an approach that focuses primarily on relationship, exploration, and interpretation when treating patients with eating disorders. Though it is true that short-term, behaviorally-oriented treatments often result in limited improvement and symptom-substitution, it is equally true that long-term psychodynamic therapies can flounder due to intractable symptoms. Symptoms can become health- or even life-threatening, creating a sense of urgency (and sometimes, actual emergency) rarely experienced with other disorders. Frightened family members and managed care pressures add to this recipe for therapist angst, making it extremely difficult for clinicians to retain a reflective stance and maintain a treatment frame that facilitates psychodynamic work. Therapists are often torn between the need for interventions for symptoms and a desire to understand, or at least not re-enact, the patient’s problematic family relationships. As pressures build and objectivity diminishes, therapists become vulnerable to unproductive enactments unless they have a framework for introducing symptom-directed interventions. On the other hand, implementing symptom-directed interventions without understanding relevant psychodynamic factors can be problematic, as Case 1 illustrates.

CASE 1 Alan was a very disturbed teenager with severe binging-purging type AN who was quite expressive in his art work during art therapy, though he also had very low self-esteem and did not recognize that his work was expressive, symbolic, and very well executed. The treatment team suggested that he have an art show of his work in the hopes that it would improve his self-esteem. He reluctantly agreed. When the art work was displayed, it was quite revealing and indicated a marked


INTEGRATING SYMPTOM-FOCUSED INTERVENTIONS WITHIN PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY: THEORY

145

sexual preoccupation and sexual conflict that hadn’t been previously apparent. After the art show, he became less cooperative and ran away from the hospital. Alan’s core conflicts had not been fully elucidated and understood in his psychodynamic psychotherapy prior to introducing art therapy, and the art show was a premature confrontation that resulted in his leaving treatment.

The example in Case 1 illustrates the importance of psychodynamic understanding and the hazards of premature integration of active interventions. Alan’s lack of enthusiasm for the art show should have been a clue to his team that he was not ready for this intervention. A psychodynamic framework helps the therapist determine the best nature and timing of an active intervention, and to understand and make corrections in the process when symptomdirected interventions are resisted. When active interventions are integrated within a psychodynamic psychotherapy process, patients and therapists can benefit from the greater efficacy of longer-term psychodynamic treatment in addressing chronic and complex mental disorders, and premature terminations can often be prevented.

INTEGRATING SYMPTOM-FOCUSED INTERVENTIONS WITHIN PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY: THEORY Traditionally, classical psychoanalysts have avoided incorporating behavioral interventions into psychodynamic therapy processes as much as possible, believing that activity by the therapist could forestall the development and elaboration of transference and foster acting on the counter-transference. However, even the founder of psychoanalysis acknowledged that free association and interpretation sometimes had to be supplemented by other interventions when he advocated a form of exposure therapy for agoraphobia: “One can hardly master a phobia if one waits till the patient lets the analysis influence him to give it up.One succeeds only when one can induce the patients by the influence of the analysis.to go into the street and to struggle with their anxiety while they make the attempt” (Freud, 1919, p. 166). Most of Freud’s early followers were less flexible, perhaps because they were uncertain about how to use behavioral interventions while remaining faithful to psychoanalytic tenets. More recently, psychoanalysts with relational and social constructivist perspectives have since argued that it is preferable to understand the idiosyncratic meanings of the therapist’s actions to the patient rather than to try to avoid activity altogether (Mitchell & Black, 1995). Indeed, some have emphasized the potential for classical, “abstinent” analytic behavior to recapitulate the patient’s painful childhood relationship with a schizoid, depressed, or neglectful parent, with the result that the patient either flees treatment or acts out in order to draw the therapist into greater involvement (Hoffman, 1994; Searles, 1999). Relational theory allows considerable freedom for active interventions in psychodynamic therapy by defining transference as the patient’s idiosyncratic perspective on the real activity of the therapist. Thus, rather than obscuring the transference, introduction of behavioral techniques may highlight previously unrecognized aspects of the transference (Tobin & Johnson, 1991). For example, patients with narcissistic traits may avoid CBT homework because they feel it is somehow “beneath” them, while others may experience it as punitive or controlling. Still others may welcome it


146

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

as an opportunity to be effective and independent of the therapist. If explored sensitively, the patient’s reactions to the behavioral intervention often bring up new historical material that can be used to understand and modify problematic object relations.

INTEGRATING SYMPTOM-FOCUSED INTERVENTIONS WITHIN PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY: PRACTICE General Considerations Patient selection, timing, and the therapist’s expertise with various interventions are important factors that affect decisions about including active interventions within psychodynamic psychotherapy. Although probably both treatments (psychodynamic psychotherapy and symptom-focused interventions) include aspects of each other (whether acknowledged or not), the presentation of the patient often determines which methods will be primary. At one extreme, for example, is the patient who comes to treatment indicating that he or she needs help, that their eating behavior is out of control, and that they are willing to do whatever it takes to recover. If such a patient has little evidence of character disorder, a supportive healthy family, and a brief history of bulimia nervosa, straightforward educational or cognitive behavioral approaches may suffice. One might expect that such a patient could be given a self-help manual for cognitive behavioral therapy and recover without additional treatment. However, even in this situation, meeting periodically with a therapist who provides guidance and support while the patient utilizes the CBT manual results in a much greater likelihood of response and recovery (Perkins, Murphy, Schmidt & Williams, 2006). At the other extreme, patients with a classic neurotic issue (for example, an unresolved oedipal conflict) that is entwined with an eating disorder might be considered ideal candidates for longer-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. However, even these patients can benefit greatly from incorporation of appropriately timed active interventions. Finally, some patients with multiple, serious, chronic illnesses (e.g., a patient with alcohol dependence, AN, and narcissistic personality disorder) might seem untreatable with any method. These are patients who may initially require draconian methods, including involuntary hospitalization and court ordered medication. Even so, an empathic doctorepatient relationship, in which underlying psychodynamic conflicts are considered during the course of a set of very active interventions, is likely to lead to a more positive outcome. In time, the patient may recover sufficiently to be able to participate in meaningful insight-oriented psychotherapy with strategically integrated active interventions. The hallmarks of successful integration are flexibility and creativity. We liken the treatment to putting together a puzzle rather than following a road map in a manual. Therefore, instead of drawing a map, we will outline a few principles that may serve as pieces for the puzzle that each therapistepatient dyad must put together to promote healing.

Respect the Symptoms The first puzzle piece represents an attitude rather than an activity. Faced with frightening medical complications, distressed family members, and impatient insurance reviewers, even


INTEGRATING SYMPTOM-FOCUSED INTERVENTIONS WITHIN PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY: PRACTICE

147

psychodynamically oriented clinicians can quickly begin to view symptoms only within the frame of “things to be gotten rid of.” This is especially true when behavioral interventions are implemented. We must bring the wise words of Harold Boris (1984) into our work by recognizing that the illness, though destructive, represents a psychological achievement that has saved the patient from something worse. As another well known clinician (Craig Johnson, personal communication) remarked, “There are worse things than eating disorders.” There are several reasons why respecting symptoms forms an important foundation for subsequent interventions directed at ameliorating them. First, symptoms themselves represent an important part of the patient’s experiencedrespecting them conveys respect for the patient. Second, exploring symptoms can open up a wealth of associations and historical information that may not have come to light otherwise. A third reason is that often it is only in a respectful, safe atmosphere that the patient will reveal the details that are necessary to plan good behavioral interventions. Finally, as seen in the following case example, one common function of eating disorder symptoms is to preserve autonomy. Respecting symptoms can facilitate a subtle shift in the therapeutic relationship that paradoxically makes it easier for the patient to give them up.

CASE 2 Anita, a 22-year-old college student with a history of anorexia in adolescence, entered psychodynamic therapy for anxiety and depression related to her upcoming graduation. However, she appeared to be losing weight and was not discussing this in therapy. One day when Anita referred to her “anorexic episode” while discussing recent events in her family, the therapist remarked, “It was kind of ingenious for a 14-year-old to come up with something [the anorexia] that would show your folks they couldn’t control you, while at the same time keeping them close and involved.” Anita was momentarily quiet and thoughtful while this sank in, then said, “But you know, that didn’t really workdit got me locked up. And I’m afraid I’m going back to some of the same habits more recently.”

Discuss the Symptoms in Detail While exploring the meaning and functions of symptoms is a basic ingredient of all psychodynamic psychotherapy, details about the eating disordered patient’s symptomatic thoughts and behaviors often get overlooked, for several reasons. First, the patient is ashamed of the symptoms, or, on the other hand, is protective of them and equates revealing them to giving them up. Second, therapists may assume that they know what a patient means when in fact they don’t. What constitutes a binge? What does it mean when the patient says he or she is restricting? This information might be obtained on intake, but not routinely reexplored. Third, therapists may have their own countertransference discomfort with details about the symptoms, especially binging, vomiting, and laxative abuse. Finally, other topics, such as relationships or childhood events, may seem more interesting or important. Sometimes this is true, but it can also be an expression of resistance or denial on the part of the patient or therapist (Gutwill, 1994). We believe that talking with patients about symptomatic behavior in detail is important, not only because it conveys respect for the symptom (and the patient), but also because it


148

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

elicits two kinds of important information. First, we learn things that are important for cognitive-behavioral interventions, such as antecedents, consequences, and maladaptive cognitions that can sustain the behaviors. Secondly, we often hear important themes about pieces of history, and family interaction patterns that might not have been revealed otherwise. Detailed discussions of symptoms deepen the alliance and facilitate the development of a “shared language” between patient and therapist. With practice, clinicians can develop skills for “listening with both ears” when the patient describes her symptomsdthat is, attending both to the behavioral factors and to the psychodynamic meanings. To explore symptoms fully, we must be willing to ask very specific questions. Talking about the behaviors in detail ameliorates the patient’s shame and expectation that the therapist will view symptoms as “just stupid, something I need to get over.” This expectation may serve as a defense against knowing what the eating and body image disturbances reveal about the core of the patient’s most profound and intimate struggles (Bloom, Kogel & Zaphiropoulos, 1994). For example, if the patient says that she had a hard day at work, binged and purged, and ended up hating herself, ask questions like, “What was hard about work?” “When did you start thinking about binging?” “What food did you think about binging on?” “Did you try to stop it? How?” “What did you do when you left work.and then.and then.etc?” “What did you do after binging?” “What did you find so hateful about yourself?” “Did you have other feelings?”

Deconstruct the Meanings of Food and Weight In addition to talking about symptomatic behaviors, therapists should be prepared to discuss specifics about food, weight, and size. Again, this is not just important for planning cognitive-behavioral interventionsdit also attends to a significant and emotionally charged aspect of the patient’s experience (Bloom & Kogel, 1994a). One clinician likens discussions about food to explorations of dreams. In the appropriate context, she will ask patients to describe what comes to mind about a particular food item, what childhood experiences the patient might have had with different foods, or what she imagines the therapist does or does not eat (Zerbe, 2008). This can become part of a dialectic in which educational and behavioral interventions are woven together with psychodynamic explorations, as the following vignette (case 3) illustrates.

CASE 2, CONTINUED Several months later, Anita was telling her therapist about challenging herself to go out to breakfast with some fellow students. Afterwards she had intense urges to purge and exercise, but she was at a loss to explain this resurgence of symptoms. In the ensuing discussion, the therapist asked Anita to tell her about what she ate. Anita replied, “Orange juice, eggs, and 2 pieces of toastdnot a big deal for me anymore.” When the therapist asked her to associate to these particular food items, however, Anita said, “Now I remember. I couldn’t put any jelly on my toast, even though everyone else was. I remember that was how my anorexia started: I wouldn’t put anything on my bread. My dad used to make fun of me for itdhe didn’t understand.” The therapist encouraged Anita to work on adding appropriate condiments to her meals, while facilitating a fruitful discussion about how her father’s responses continued to trigger her symptoms.



149

Be Aware of Common Functions of Symptoms. Understanding the meanings and functions of symptoms is a major goal for psychodynamic psychotherapy in itself. It also is an essential foundation for integrating non-dynamic interventions within the therapy, because knowing the functions served by a particular patient’s symptoms allows us to better plan the type, timing, and potential reactions to any kind of non-dynamic intervention In addition to suggesting clarifications or interventions that we might otherwise overlook; another important role of theoretical literature is to help contain our anxieties and foster reflective thinking, much as a good supervisor would do (Almond, 2003). A thorough review of the meanings and functions of eating disorder symptoms could be the subject of another book. We have chosen to list a number of them in Box 9.1. We will explore, in more detail, one of the most common and vexing uses of symptoms: to test the therapist within the transference. A common example of a test of control and structure (Stern, 1986) is a patient with AN who continues to lose weight, yet does not acknowledge his or her condition or refuses to enter residential treatment. In childhood, many such patients were effectively coerced into complying with overly strict rules that met their caregivers’ narcissistic needs, yet lacked more benevolent forms of discipline such as having limits set in their best interests. These patients present therapists with a dilemma: should the therapist aggressively pursue the higher level of care, and risk being perceived as an autocratic, narcissistic caregiver, or should they allow the patient to remain as he or she is, and thus express the uninvolved, neglectful characteristics of the caregiver? In general, a therapist passes a test when he or she is able to attend to both sides of the conflict. Often the best approach is to turn the dilemma back to the patient (Hoffman, 1992) by saying something like, “I’m extremely concerned about your weight loss. Part of me wants to try to make you go to residential treatment, but I’m afraid you’d feel controlled and pushed. Yet I’m afraid you’d experience me as not really understanding your illness or caring about your well-being if we do nothing. How can we deal with this?” Additional guidelines for responding to tests involving control and structure are listed in Box 9.2. While transference tests are often painful for therapists, we must realize that the patient is from the outset presenting us with two of his or her most fundamental dilemmas: how to become one’s true self, and how to get one’s dependency needs met without being controlled. One positive aspect of these quandaries is that they highlight another important piece of the puzzle: the importance of understanding transference implications of symptoms as a foundation for designing non-psychodynamic interventions.

Relate the Symptom to the Transference Another common function of symptoms is as a communication to the therapist, often about transference issues (Hamburg, 1989). Symptoms can communicate feelings or ideas that the patient cannot yet put into words, and thus worsening symptoms may represent “speaking louder so that the therapist can hear” (Brisman, 1996).


150

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

BOX 9.1

SOME COMMON PSYCHODYNAMIC FUNCTIONS OF EATING DISORDER SYMPTOMS • Rebel against a strict caregiver/superego and express autonomy (Zerbe, 1998) • Test the therapist to see if s/he will respond in the same way as early caregivers (Weiss & Sampson, 1986) • Displace anxiety or shame onto fears of weight gain or hatred for the body (Mintz, 1985b) • Avoid recovery because it is perceived as resulting in overwhelming demands for performance (Mintz, 1992) • Avoid recovery because it is equated with becoming a narcissistic extension of the therapist (Reich & Cierpka, 1998) • Substitute self-destructiveness related to the eating disorder for suicide (Mintz, 1985a) • Rid the self of an intrusive and/or abusive internalized caregiver (Zerbe, 1993) • Preserve a relationship with an internalized caregiver (Zerbe, 1996) • Elicit caregiving that was absent in earlier life, including limit-setting (Zerbe, 2001) • Maintain a pathological identity (Dennis & Sansone, 1990) • Avoid recovery because it is equated with losing the therapist (Garner, Garfinkel & Bemis, 1982) • Distract both patient and therapist from painful topics (Thompson & Sherman, 1989) • Avoid mourning (particularly of lost youth in older patients) (Zerbe, 2008)

• Precipitate rejection by the therapist, because it is less painful to be rejected for unacceptable behavior than for intrinsic unacceptability (Garner, Garfinkel, & Bemis, 1982) • Regulate feelings and protect the self from fragmentation or emptiness (Krueger, 1997) • Express emotional pain for which the patient cannot yet find words (Bloom & Kogel, 1994b) • Express anger or exact revenge (Stern, 1986) • Communicate feelings to the therapist via projective identification (Mintz, 1992) • Illustrate problematic object relations via metaphor (e.g., the relationship with food parallels relationships with important others) (Rozen, 1993) • Re-enact dissociated traumatic memories (Gutwill & Gitter, 1994) • Protect the self against re-traumatization by becoming unattractive (Gutwill & Gitter, 1994) • Undo or compensate for positive steps in other areas of life out of unconscious guilt (Reich & Cierpka, 1998) • Obtain nurturance and connection while avoiding the risks of intimacy (Rozen, 1993) • Communicate transference feelings that are too frightening to express in words (Hamburg, 1989) • Defend against feelings of powerlessness and ineffectiveness (Bruch, 1982)



151

BOX 9.2

RESPONDING TO PATIENTS’ TESTS OF CONTROL AND STRUCTURE (STERN, 1986) • Keep the patient’s needs and interests primary at all times • Provide only as much structure as the patient needs, and only in the areas he or she needs it • Take a clear, firm therapeutic stance, emphasizing the concern for the patient’s well-being

• State your rationale, but don’t insist that the patient agree with you • Set clear behavioral limits and apply consequences consistently • Reassess the needs for structure frequently as treatment progresses

CASE 3 Barbara, a 35-year-old woman with EDNOS (Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified), cancelled several sessions after her therapist gave her a self-monitoring assignment, then arrived in great distress, reporting worsening symptoms. Her therapist then inquired, “When we talk, you say you appreciate me and like my suggestions for getting better control of the binging and purging, but your cancelling sessions says something else. Are there perhaps other parts of our relationship that you find more difficult to express in words?” Barbara replied that she was ashamed that she could not control her symptoms and felt put down by the therapist’s suggestions of “oversimplified behavioral stuff.” Yet she did not want to risk losing the therapist by being open about her feelings, stating “You just did not do that in my family.” Her therapist realized that he would have to consider Barbara’s tendency to be narcissistically injured by interventions whenever he made concrete suggestions to Barbara about managing her symptoms.

Even when explicit transference interpretations are not made, clinicians must be aware of transference issues when designing and introducing non-psychodynamic interventions. Before intervening, the therapist should ask him or herself, “What role is the patient placing me in? Given this patient’s relationship history, how are they likely to experience my recommendation for this particular intervention at this particular time?” Sometimes an intervention must be implemented before the answers to these questions are clear, but they can be answered retrospectively in collaboration with the patient, a process that is often very beneficial see Chapter 19).

Monitor the Countertransference Therapists should also ask themselves a third, critical question: “What part, if any, of the motivation for my intervention is based on my countertransference rather than the patient’s needs at the moment?”


152

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

CASE 3, CONTINUED Barbara continued to struggle with binging despite some initial improvement. She still cancelled sessions occasionally and seemed to regard the therapist’s behavioral suggestions as simplistic. The therapist began to feel that he lacked sufficient skills and ideas, and was about to recommend a medication consult and possibly a referral to a CBT practitioner whom he had recently met at a conference. He decided to bring the case to peer supervision first, and in the process of presenting realized that his reactions to Barbara’s behavior were helping him understand her experience as the family “genius” who was still not taken seriously. His reactiondthe heretofore unconscious wish to flee the treatmentdwas exactly how she responded to narcissistic injuries in relationships.

This vignette illustrates one of the common functions of symptomsdas a nonverbal communication of some aspect of the patient’s experience via projective identification (Grotstein, 1994). In fact, eating disorder symptoms commonly engender in the therapist the same feelings of helplessness and ineffectiveness as the patient has experienced (Mintz, 1992). The therapist’s willingness to bear the distress associated with Barbara’s projections bore fruit in the form of enhanced understanding of her inner relational world. Barbara may still have benefited from a medication consult or CBT referral, but by containing and processing his reaction first, her therapist could allow her needs, rather than his reactions, to determine the nature and timing of the interventions. The vignette also illustrates how implementation of non-psychodynamic interventions can sometimes reflect the counter-transference difficulties of accompanying a patient on their often painful journey to healing (Zerbe, 1998). Though withholding interventions can be an equally hazardous form of enactment, therapists often end up wanting to “feed” the patientdin the form of symptom-directed interventionsdtoo much too soon, related to the anxiety and frustration that the dangerous and highly visible symptoms arouse (Chessick, 1984). We must not forget that listening is an ancient and profound mode of healing in itself. There are few situations so urgent that there is no time to explore the patient’s understanding of the worsening symptoms, and what he or she thinks might be helpful.

Discuss the Intervention with the Patient and Explore His or Her Reactions One of the elements that makes psychodynamic therapy psychodynamic is its emphasis on the patient’s unique subjectivity (Gabbard, 2004). For the therapy to remain truly psychodynamic, the patient needs to be given accurate factual information about the proposed interventions and then invited to explore his or her idiosyncratic reactions to them.

CASE 3, CONTINUED The therapy alliance palpably improved after Barbara’s therapist was able to bring some of his insights about the transferenceecounter-transference interactions into the treatment. It was Barbara who brought up the idea of trying fluoxetine. The therapist encouraged her to explore what it would be like to take medication for her eating disorder, and how she felt about having him



153

prescribe it versus a referral to another psychiatrist. After spending most of the session discussing the meanings of taking medication, the therapist said, “Now I’d like to set aside a little time to talk about the fluoxetinedwhat it is, how to take it, side effects, and how we’ll monitor its effectiveness. That will feel different than our usual discussions, and when we’re done I’ll want to hear what that felt like for you, to work with me as your medication doctor.”

Any non-psychodynamic intervention that is introduced needs to be provided with skill and the expectation of efficacy. For example, a psychiatrist who prescribes medication within a psychodynamic treatment process should use the same care with informed consent and follow-up that she or he would use in a medication management case. The clinician needs to decide whether she or he has the appropriate skills or if the patient should be referred. If there is a choice between a referral or an intervention provided by the original therapist, the patient should be supported in making the choice that fits best for him or her, through a discussion of the possible impact of either alternative. If a patient is referred to another clinician for the intervention, the therapist should obtain a signed release to speak with the other clinician, and periodically follow up with both patient and clinician regarding the process and progress. Patients at times have strong negative reactions to the therapist’s recommendations; this is particularly common in working with those who have borderline personality organization. In these cases, it is helpful to look for patients’ struggles with autonomy and dependency and be aware of the transference implications of their reactions. One should remind these patients that the ultimate purpose of the therapy is to restore their autonomy, which is being compromised by the eating disorder. In these challenging cases, it is most important to monitor one’s counter-transference, maintain an empathic stance, give the patient ample opportunity to air his or her views, and avoid compromising the treatment frame or backing down on a recommendation if it is truly necessary (Kernberg, 1995).

Develop a Repertoire of Active Interventions In this chapter, an underlying theme is that psychodynamic psychotherapies and active interventions can often be integrated to promote recovery, although doing so requires a thorough understanding of both approaches and skillful, empathic implementation. There is a range of active interventions that might be part of the treatment plan for eating disorder patients in dynamic or psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Among these are cognitive-behavioral techniques, educational strategies, art and expressive therapies, family interventions, and medications. Cognitive-behavioral techniques. Although some patients may be able to recover from an eating disorder with guided CBT, probably most require more extensive interventions relying on at least some elements of psychodynamic therapy. For patients already in psychodynamic or psychoanalytic therapy, choosing when and how to introduce CBT can be difficult. Some patients may be quite resistant to CBT early in treatment. They may even have started the psychodynamic therapy process because of an earlier failure with CBT. However, during the course of psychotherapy, patients may recognize the core conflicts that have facilitated the development of the eating disorder and may try various behavioral strategies of their own without success. This may represent an optimal time for introducing cognitivebehavioral techniques into a therapy which is predominantly psychodynamic.


154

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

CASE 4 Jane had worked for several months in understanding her relationship with her mother, who had worked hard to support the family after the death of her father, but had often been unavailable to Jane. After unsuccessfully trying to cope with binge eating on her own, Jane asked her therapist for advice for the first time. This willingness to ask for help not only had many psychodynamic meanings, some of which the therapist interpreted to the patient, but it also provided the therapist with the opportunity to introduce elements of CBT into the therapy, such as addressing the distorted cognition that only certain foods are “healthy.” The patient was willing to keep a diary of her food intake and trusted the therapist enough to include details of extensive binges which had previously been shameful for her. The therapist assisted the patient in devising behaviors more likely to interrupt binge eating (such as eating three meals a day and a range of foods including those that Jane particularly liked). The experience of working with the therapist in a practical definitive way on a problem was a corrective emotional experience for Jane.

Self-monitoring of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to the eating disorder is a key component of cognitive-behavioral therapy, and is usually initiated at the beginning of CBT treatment. Patients are typically asked to write down details about all food consumed, the time, place, context, and associated thoughts and feelings; and details about eating disorder behaviors such as binging, purging, exercising, or body checking. It is critically important that the recording be done in “real time;” i.e., at, or immediately after, the behavior occurs, and that the records be reviewed with the patient consistently (Fairburn, 2008). Self-monitoring may be a particularly useful tool for incorporation into psychodynamic psychotherapy because it can highlight behavior patterns with psychodynamic significance, as exemplified in the foregoing discussion of how Anita’s conflict (Case 2) about putting jelly on her toast had its roots in her interactions with her father. In addition, self-monitoring alone is wellknown to produce significant behavioral changes (Korotitsch & Nelson-Gray, 1999). However, compliance with self-monitoring is often low. For example, members of one weekly CBT group kept records on only 42% of possible days, despite being selected for higher motivation (Nichols & Gusella, 2003). Shame, rebellion, and transference distrust or anger are just a few of the psychodynamic themes that may underlie patients’ difficulties with self-monitoring. As discussed above, symptoms are expressions of patients’ most intimate secrets, and they are understandably fearful of the exposure entailed by keeping and discussing detailed records. This resistance may be disguised as concerns about the time involved, fears that monitoring will worsen food preoccupations, or statements that “I tried that before, and it didn’t work.” When introducing self-monitoring, the clinician should address the surface concerns, but also proactively and empathically discuss the underlying issues. For example, one could say something like, “Many people find it scary or embarrassing to be this specific about their behavior. That is very understandabledwe know that the eating disorder is a very important part of your life; otherwise, why would it be so hard to change? But the more we know about the truth of your experience, the better we can understand and change it.” Experts in CBT caution against using selected components of a manualized treatment apart from the entire protocol (Fairburn, 2008), arguing that the whole is greater than the



155

parts and outcomes will not be equivalent. However judiciously incorporating elements of CBT (such as self-monitoring and regular eating) into a psychodynamic process is not the same thing. The theraphy is not labeled “CBT” by the therapist, and its theory and techniques remain predominantly psychodynamic. Educational strategies. Many people who have eating disorders do not come willingly for treatment, or when they do come (often at the behest of someone else), they make it clear that they do not plan to enter into treatment or, if compelled to do so, will not cooperate. Many eating disorder patients are adept at appearing to cooperate with treatment when they are actually only complying with what they are asked to do. A typical example would be a young teenager with AN who is hospitalized on the pediatric unit and consumes all the calories brought to her by the nursing staff, but goes home and immediately refuses to consume adequate calories. Using the readiness for change concept, this patient is in the pre-contemplation stage. In other words, change is not even being considered. In this situation, providing information might seem irrelevant, but it may plant the seed for the patient to decide eventually to consider treatment. A second strategy is the therapeutic use of symptoms, signs, and laboratory data. In this circumstance, the physician specifically connects the pathological behavior (e.g., purging by vomiting) to the symptoms (for example abdominal pain), signs (tenderness on palpation of the abdomen), and laboratory data (e.g. elevated pancreatic amylase and elevated lipase). The physician then explains that the patient has pancreatitis, a dangerous, potentially lifethreatening condition. The patient may still only permit emergency intervention and refuse long-term treatment of the eating disorder and its underlying causes, but may remember the connections delineated by the doctor and be more willing to consider full treatment the next time there is a crisis. A third educational example is the use of letters. After a full evaluation including interpretation of the results and recommendations for treatment, a patient with an eating disorder often does not return. Preparing a detailed letter to the patient describing all of the findings including the effects of their eating disorder on their quality of life may provide the information and impetus needed for him or her to eventually enter treatment. We have frequently been surprised to see patients several months or years later appear with our letter in their handbag saying they are now ready to take a step forward in recovering from their eating disorder. Art Therapy. There are several situations in which art therapy can lead to very important insights, both for the patient and for members of the treatment team. Patients with eating disorders, particularly those with restricting AN, can be very conflict avoidant. Some people are able to recognize conflicts in their life via art therapy that they are otherwise unable to identify. However, this can be a two-edged sword, as illustrated by the case of Alan discussed earlier in Case 1. Art therapy can also reveal common problems interfering with function that have not always been apparent. For example, one art therapist organized a group art project that was to be shown in the treatment center. The group chose to make a very large colorful fish that was to be hung in the central dining room of the treatment facility. Although the actual project was expected to take only a few weeks to complete, it actually took several months. The issues that became apparent were problems shared by the entire group, including: passivity (some who had agreed to participate, later wished they had not agreed); inability to cooperate in designing a feasible plan to make the fish durable; passiveeaggressive behavior; and conflict-avoidance (instead of discussing disagreements about the design, some patients


156

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

FIGURE

9.1 Fish art project, a beatiful creation accomplished with great difficulty, illustrating how patients’ considerable intelligence and creativity can be juxtaposed with passive-aggression, conflict-avoidance, and over-compliance. Please refer to color plate section.

simply destroyed what another had created and inserted their own creation). The fish creation still hangs in the cafeteria (Figure 9.1), and is a constant reminder to the treatment team of themes often seen in patients with eating disordersdpassivity, conflict-avoidance, compliance versus cooperation, and passiveeaggressive behavior traits. As a final example, art therapy can reveal the intensity of a problem when it may not be apparent in traditional psychotherapy. Brian was a 23-year-old man with severe bulimia nervosa and alcohol dependence. Figure 9.2 (“An Eye for Alcohol”) is a drawing that he did during art therapy that dramatically captures the severity of his alcohol dependence, which turned out to be more serious than his eating disorder and less responsive to treatment. Expressive Therapies. Gestalt therapy, psychodrama, and dance and movement therapies are other examples of powerful expressive therapies that can often be very helpful. Carefully chosen at key points in treatment, they can be both diagnostic and therapeutic.

CASE 5 Alicia, a 25-year-old woman with bulimia nervosa, had been in psychodynamic treatment for several years and had improvement, but not resolution, of her eating disorder symptoms and relationship difficulties. Her psychiatrist thought that there were issues that she was not able to discuss verbally, and referred her for dance therapy. In the course of this work, particularly when any touch was involved, the patient became paranoid, suspicious, and actually ran as far from her dance therapist as she could. As she discussed this with her individual therapist, she described a series of events with her stepfather who had sexually molested her. It became apparent to the patient that her reaction in the dance group was related to the abuse, and she was able to explore it verbally and come to an emotional resolution, which eventually resulted in an improved relationship with her partner.



157

FIGURE 9.2 “An Eye for Alcohol,” illustrating how themes previously unidentified in verbal psychotherapy may emerge in art therapy. Please refer to color plate section.

Family Interventions. Family interventions can be very powerful, but choosing how and when to proceed requires a thorough understanding of the patient. Although psychodynamic conflicts that have originated within the family are often the main themes of individual therapy, actual interventions with the family may also be helpful. With young patients who are living at home, family therapy may be crucial to recovery. The “Maudsley Method,” a recently popularized treatment strategy for adolescent patients with AN, relies exclusively on family work until the patient is fully weight restored. At that point, a determination is made regarding further family or individual psychotherapy (Lock, Le Grange, Agras & Dare, 2002). Although there is often dramatic improvement in eating behaviors and weight, some family members complain that the actions taken to support weight restoration have interfered with their relationship with their daughter or son. This complaint is surprisingly similar to the concern that individual therapists have when implementing active therapies. Although the Maudsley Method has promise, developing a better psychodynamic understanding of the patient (and family) prior to implementing this kind of intervention may be more helpful in the long run and less potentially damaging to family relationships. Medications. Timing the introduction of medication is important, for both physiological and psychodynamic reasons. It is important that the patient be ready to accept the medication and informed about its possible benefits and side effects. This can often be successfully accomplished in discussions between the therapist and patient and supplemented with educational materials. In addition, the physician prescribing the medication (who may also be the therapist) should know when the medications are likely to work. Semi-starved, poorly nourished eating disorder patients are often given medications early in treatment when they are unlikely to work. The serotonin reuptake inhibitors require adequate brain serotonin, which may not be available in patients consuming inadequate carbohydrates, and use of these medications when the patient is semi-starved is not only ineffective, but counter-therapeutic. The patient may come to believe that the medications can never be


158

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

helpful, even though they might have been if given after nutritional status had improved. Delgado and his colleagues have shown that the SSRIs are ineffective when patients are on a calorie restricted diet (Delgado et al., 1990). Cognitive behavioral techniques, educational strategies, art and expressive therapies, family interventions, and medications are just a few of the active interventions that can be incorporated into a psychodynamic psychotherapy process. The range of potential interventions is broad, and in addition to the foregoing, may include a 12-step approach, gestalt techniques, guided imagery, role playing, dialectical behavior therapy skills, body image techniques, and others. Both dynamic understanding and behavioral change can be enhanced by judicious implementation of active techniques when therapists are mindful of the theoretical and practical factors discussed above. Key considerations include respecting and deconstructing the symptoms, understanding the transference and counter-transference implications of recommending an active intervention, and carefully choosing the timing of the intervention. Also, clinicians should only offer those interventions in which they are skilled, or be prepared to refer. When possible, empirically supported interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral techniques, family therapy for adolescents, and fluoxetine for bulimia nervosa, should be preferred. However, many patients have already tried these treatments without benefit and may need alternative approaches. Finally, patients’ responses to interventions should be monitored to ensure efficacy and identify previously unrecognized dynamic factors.

Monitor the patient’s reactions to the intervention Whether the therapist provides the non-psychodynamic intervention or refers the patient, she or he must monitor the patient’s adherence to the recommendations, reactions to the change in the therapy process, and symptomatic improvement or lack thereof. As discussed above, patients’ reactions to interventions often highlight previously unrecognized aspects of the transference or early history.

CASE 2, CONTINUED Anita and her therapist had agreed that some family sessions would be helpful, and Anita eagerly accepted a referral list. Two weeks later, her therapist began a session by saying, “Before we start, I’d like to take a little time to see how the family therapy has been going.” Anita was silent, then somewhat ashamedly admitted that she had not arranged any appointments. At first she blamed her schedule, but eventually was able to relate her concerns that if she was helped by the family therapy, her therapist would feel abandoned or narcissistically injured, as her parents seemed to be when she chose not to follow in their footsteps for her career.

Monitoring needs to be an ongoing process, and each therapist will develop his or her own style for follow-up. Regardless of the style that is used, however, it is clear that close followup is critically important for the efficacy of behavioral interventions. For example, food diaries are powerful behavioral tools only when a therapist reviews them with the patient or returns them with comments (Herzog, Franko & Brotman, 1989).


CONCLUSION

159

CONCLUSION Over time, a therapist-patient dyad will develop a dialectical process in which different non-psychodynamic intervention “puzzle pieces” are put together within a psychodynamic therapeutic frame. The interweaving of sometimes disparate theories and therapies by the clinician provides not only the real help needed by the patient but symbolically models what the patient herself must do internally. Though demanding skill and versatility, we believe that this integration is necessary in meeting the multifaceted needs of our challenging patients.

References Almond, R. (2003). The holding function of theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 131e153. Bachar, E., Latzer, Y., Kreitler, S., & Berry, E. M. (1999). Empirical comparison of two psychological therapies: Self psychology and cognitive orientation in the treatment of anorexia and bulimia. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 8, 115e128. Bloom, C., & Kogel, L. (1994a). Tracing development: the feeding experience and the body. In C. Bloom, A. Gitter, S. Gutwill, L. Kogel, & L. Zaphiropoulos (Eds.), Eating problems: A feminist psychoanalytic treatment model (pp. 40e56). New York, NY: Basic Books. Bloom, C., & Kogel, L. (1994b). Symbolic meanings of food and body. In C. Bloom, A. Gitter, S. Gutwill, L. Kogel & L. Zaphiropoulos (Eds.), Eating problems: A feminist psychoanalytic treatment model (pp. 57e66). New York, NY: Basic Books. Bloom, C., Kogel, L., & Zaphiropoulos, L. (1994). Beginning the eating and body work: stance and tools. In C. Bloom, A. Gitter, S. Gutwill, L. Kogel, & L. Zaphiropoulos (Eds.), Eating problems: A feminist psychoanalytic treatment model (pp. 67e82). New York, NY: Basic Books. Boris, H. N. (1984). The problem of anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 65, 315e322. Brisman, J. (1996). Psychodynamic psychotherapy and action-oriented technique: An integrated approach. In J. Werne & D. Yalom (Eds.), Treating eating disorders.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc. Bruch, H. (1982). Anorexia nervosa: theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 139, 1531e1538. Bulik, C. M., Berkman, N. D., & Brownley, K. A. (2007). Anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 310e320. Chessick, R. D. (1984). Clinical notes toward the understanding and intensive psychotherapy of adult eating disorders. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 12, 301e322. Dare, C., Eisler, I., Russell, G., Treasure, J., & Dodge, L. (2001). Psychotherapies for adults with anorexia nervosa. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 216e221. Delgado, P. L., Charney, D. S., Price, L. H., Aghajanian, G. K., Landis, H., & Heninger, G. R. (1990). Serotonin function and the mechanism of antidepressant action. Reversal of antidepressant-induced remission by rapid depletion of plasma tryptophan. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 411e418. Dennis, A. B., & Sansone, R. A. (1990). The clinical stages of treatment for the eating disorder patient with borderline personality disorder. In C. L. Johnson (Ed.), Psychodynamic treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia (pp. 128e164). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Freud, S. (1919). Lines of advance in psychoanalytic therapy. Standard Edition, 17, 159e168. Gabbard, G. O. (2004). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A basic text. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., & Bemis, K. M. (1982). A multidimensional psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 1, 3e47. Garner, D. M., Rockert, W., Davis, R., Garner, M. V., Olmsted, M. P., & Eagle, M. (1993). Comparison of cognitivebehavioral and supportive-expressive therapy for bulimia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 37e46. Grotstein, J. S. (1994). Projective identification and countertransference: A brief comment on their relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 30, 578e592.


160

9. SCIENCE OR ART?

Gutwill, S. (1994). Transference and countertransference issues: social pressures. In C. Bloom, A. Gitter, S. Gutwill, L. Kogel, & L. Zaphiropoulos (Eds.), Eating problems: A feminist psychoanalytic treatment model (pp. 144e171). New York, NY: Basic Books. Gutwill, S., & Gitter, A. (1994). Eating problems and sexual abuse. In C. Bloom, A. Gitter, S. Gutwill, L. Kogel, & L. Zaphiropoulos (Eds.), Eating problems: A feminist psychoanalytic treatment model (pp. 205e226). New York, NY: Basic Books. Hamburg, P. (1989). Bulimia: the construction of a symptom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 17, 131e140. Herzog, D. B., Franko, D. L., & Brotman, A. W. (1989). Integrating treatment for bulimia nervosa. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 17, 141e150. Hoffman, I. Z. (1992). Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 287e304. Hoffman, I. Z. (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63, 187e218. Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., Jr., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 348e358. Kernberg, O. F. (1995). Technical approach to eating disorders in patients with borderline personality organization. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 23, 33e48. Knekt, P., Lindfors, O., Harkanen, T., Valikoski, M., Virtala, E., Laaksonen, M. A., . Helsinki psychotherapy study group. (2008). Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 38, 689e703. Korotitsch, W. J., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment, 11, 415e425. Krueger, D. (1997). Food as self-object in eating disorder patients. Psychoanalytic Review, 84, 617e630. Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S., & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1208e1216. Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2007). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A systematic review of techniques, indications and empirical evidence. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 217e228. Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1551e1565. Lock, J., Le Grange, D. L., Agras, S., & Dare, C. (2002). Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: A family-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Lundgren, J. D., Danoff-Burg, S., & Anderson, D. A. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa: An empirical analysis of clinical significance. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 262e274. Mintz, I. L. (1992). A comparison between the analyst’s view and the patient’s diary. In C. P. Wilson, C. C. Hogan, & I. L. Mintz (Eds.), Psychodynamic technique in the treatment of the eating disorders (pp. 157e194). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc. Mintz, I. L. (1985a). Psychoanalytic description: The clinical picture of anorexia nervosa and bulimia. In C. P. Wilson, C. C. Hogan, & I. L. Mintz (Eds.), Fear of being fat: The treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia (pp. 217e244). New York, NY: Jason Aronson, Inc. Mintz, I. L. (1985b). Psychoanalytic therapy of severe anorexia. In C. P. Wilson, C. C. Hogan, & I. L. Mintz (Eds.), Fear of being fat: The treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia (pp. 83e114). New York, NY: Jason Aronson, Inc. Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic theory. New York, NY: Basic Books. Nichols, S., & Gusella, J. (2003). Food for thought: will adolescent girls with eating disorders self-monitor in a CBT group? Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review, 12, 37e39. Perkins, S. J., Murphy, R., Schmidt, U., & Williams, C. (2006). Self-help and guided self-help for eating disorders. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 19(3). CD004191 Reich, G., & Cierpka, M. (1998). Identity conflicts in bulimia nervosa. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 18, 383e402. Richards, P. S., Baldwin, B. M., Frost, H. A., Clarksly, J. B., Berrett, M. E., & Hardman, R. K. (2000). What works for treating eating disorders? Conclusions of 28 outcome reviews. Eating Disorders, 8, 189e206. Rozen, D. L. (1993). Projective identification and bulimia nervosa. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 10, 261e273.


CONCLUSION

161

Searles, H. F. (1999). Countertransference and Related Subjects: Selected Papers. New York, NY: International University Press. Simmons, A. M., Milnes, S. M., & Anderson, D. A. (2008). Factors affecting the utilization of empirically supported treatments for eating disorders. Eating Disorders, 16, 342e354. Steinhausen, H. (2002). Outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1284e1293. Stern, S. (1986). Dynamics of clinical management in the treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 233e254. Strober, M., Freeman, R., & Morell, W. (1997). The long-term course of severe anorexia nervosa in adolescents: Survival analysis of recovery, relapse, and outcome predictors over 10e15 years in a prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 339e360. Thompson, R. A., & Sherman, R. T. (1989). Therapist errors in treating eating disorders. Psychotherapy, 26, 62e68. Thompson-Brenner, H., & Westen, D. (2005a). A naturalistic study of psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa, Part 1, comorbidity and therapeutic outcome. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193, 544e573. Thompson-Brenner, H., & Westen, D. (2005b). A naturalistic study of psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa, Part 2, therapeutic interventions in the community. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193, 585e595. Tobin, D. L., & Johnson, C. L. (1991). The integration of psychodynamic and behavior therapy in the treatment of eating disorders: Clinical issues versus theoretical mystique. In C. L. Johnson (Ed.), Psychodynamic treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia (pp. 374e397). New York: The Guilford Press. Treasure, J., Todd, G., Brolly, M., Tiller, J., Nehmed, A., & Denman, F. (1995). A pilot study of a randomised trial of cognitive analytical therapy vs. educational behavioral therapy for adult anorexia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 363e367. Weiss, J., & Sampson, H. (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Work Group on Eating Disorders. (2006). Practice guideline for treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). Retrieved January 28, 2009 from: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc. Web site: http://www.psychiatryonline. com/content.aspx?aID¼138662; doi: 10.1176/Appi.books.9780890423363.138660 Zerbe, K. J. (1993). Whose body is it anyway? Understanding and treating psychosomatic aspects of eating disorders. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 57, 161e178. Zerbe, K. J. (1996). Feminist psychodynamic psychotherapy of eating disorders: Theoretic integration informing clinical practice. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 19, 811e827. Zerbe, K. J. (1998). Knowable secrets: Transference and countertransference manifestations in eating disordered patients. In W. Vandereycken, & P. J. V. Beumont (Eds.), Treating eating disorders: Ethical, legal, and personal issues (pp. 30e55). London, UK: The Athlone Press. Zerbe, K. J. (2001). The crucial role of psychodynamic understanding in the treatment of eating disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 305e313. Zerbe, K. J. (2008). Integrated treatment of eating disorders: Beyond the body betrayed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.


C H A P T E R

10 New Pathways Applying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to the Treatment of Eating Disorders Kathy Kater In my first session with a patient who is battling body image and eating-related concerns, I routinely ask some version of this: What percentage of your daily waking hours would you say you spend thinking about or taking some action related to feeling bad about your body or worrying about your weightdor engaged in some kind of thought or behavior having to do with eating, not eating, or burning calories? You know, things like worrying about how fat or thin you are, the number on the scale, wrestling with thoughts about fooddplanning to eat, what not to eat, actually eating or actively not eating, feeling bad about what you ate, counting calories, getting rid of calories, checking how flat your stomach feelsdthat sort of thing?

In thirty years as an eating disorder (ED) specialist, the responses I have heard have nearly always fallen between 80 and 95%. This is the state of an ED mind. While the medical consequences of an ED can be life threatening, the unrelenting internal dialog and the consuming behavioral rituals that briefly quiet these tortuous thoughts are what cause most of the suffering. The endless stream of fear-based judgments, rules, demands, and threats can take over a mind and sometimes drive a life into the ground. It is in the face of these “eating disorder thoughts,” and the difficult emotions and compulsions they provoke, that patients must triumph if they are to begin the long road to recovery. Even those who have managed to interrupt ED behaviors for weeks, months, or even years, remain vulnerable to the re-emergence of powerful mental formations that may trigger a relapse. Given the power and irrational nature of ED thoughts, it makes sense that cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT), an empirically supported treatment that applies rational, objective arguments to challenge, change, and reduce the frequency of illogical and harmful self-talk, has become the best supported treatment for ED. Despite this, surveys suggest that, while most ED therapists are trained in CBT, the majority do not use it as their primary approach. Instead, I, and many colleagues, employ a mix of approaches, some empirically supported and some not, in an effort to help patients create happier, healthier lives (Simmons, Milnes & Anderson, 2008; Tobin, Banker, Weisberg & Bowers, 2007).


163


164

10. NEW PATHWAYS

My reason for looking beyond CBT is that I have rarely found rational arguments or objective evidence to be effective in assuaging entrenched ED thoughts, or the difficult emotions and impulses that accompany them. While it is always tempting to appeal to reason and logic to challenge and change irrational, self-destructive thinking, in my clinical experiance this just does not work. For me, the compelling methods of Acceptance and Committment theraphy (ACT, spoken as a single word) seem to have more impact. Along with other metacognitive approaches (Hayes, Follette & Linehan 2004a), ACT does not focus on rooting out or changing the content of thoughts or emotions. Instead, it aims to develop our patients’ willingness to face these in order to see and respond to them in a way that is more helpful. Specifically, ACT helps patients to accept that the emergence of thoughts, feelings, and sensations is not something that is in our power to control, but how we relate to these mental events can be transforming (Hayes, 2004). This supports and enhances an approach that has evolved for me out of my own experience of “what works,” both in my own life, and in helping patients with EDs achieve and maintain recovery. ACT’s emphasis on facing and accepting what is not in our power to control seems uniquely well-suited for treatment (and prevention) of body image and eating problems, particularly in today’s socio-cultural context. In this environment, messages promoting a thin body ideal create and reinforce the myth that anyone can and everyone should achieve this ideal through diet and exercise. Belief in this myth can be the trigger for ED in those who are vulnerable, and is the catalyst for widespread body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in the rest of the population. Against this backdrop of widespread stigma about weight and what “should” be done about it, our patients must face the truth about what can be realistically “controlled” about the body’s hunger and weight regulatory systems in general, their own body’s natural predisposition in particular, and a need to abstain from “weight management” in order to recover. Working with patients around acceptance of “what is” in order to free energy for the steps that can be taken to sustain and promote health, vitality, and self-esteem, has long been central to my clinical practice. This belief drove me to develop a universal health education approach, The Model for Healthy Body Image and Weight, upon which the Healthy Body Image curriculum is based. My model provides three guiding principles that closely parallel those found in ACT (Kater, 2005): 1. Accept what is not in our power to control about body size and shape, the biological nature of hunger, and the counterproductive effects of “dieting” (i.e., eating for the purpose of weight loss). 2. Understand and take action on what is in our power to choose in regard to health and wellness: eating well, physical fitness, acceptance of the size and shape that results from wholesome choices, balanced attention to all aspects of personal identity, and choosing realistic role models. 3. Develop resiliency in the face of social pressures that conflict with these principles through historical perspective on today’s body image attitudes, media literacy, and interpersonal support. Given current norms, ED sufferers must not only learn to respond more healthfully in the face of difficult internal states (thoughts, feelings, sensations, and impulses), but also faulty


ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY IN A NUTSHELL

165

external norms (prevalent but erroneous views about the malleability of bodies and the purpose of eating and exercise). ACT offers a new way to stand with a patient whose consuming, constricted thoughts and fears are maddeningly reinforced by the wider culture, to help them accept difficult realities, and to take the steps needed to support a life based on their most deeply held values in spite of this. In what follows, readers should keep in mind that my experience with the application of ACT to the treatment of patients with ED is limited to an outpatient practice. If patients need more help than outpatient work provides in order to make progress, I refer them to a higher level of care where ACT interventions may or may not be appropriate.

ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY IN A NUTSHELL ACT is one of a “third-wave” of scientifically based behavioral and cognitive therapies. It is supported by a rich body of research dating back some 25 years that documents its effectiveness with disorders of experiential avoidance, disorders that are driven by a compelling urge to avoid or control unwanted internal experiencesdthoughts, emotions, or sensations (Hayes, Strosahl, Bunting, Twohig & Wilson, 2004; Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda & Lillis, 2006). A growing body of comparative studies suggests that ACT may actually be more effective than CBT, psycho-educational approaches, and psychopharmacology in treating avoidance disorders (Hayes & Strosahl, 2005). While only one published case study documents the successful application of ACT for anorexia nervosa (AN) (Heffner, Sperry, Eifert & Detweiler 2002), ED behaviors are certainly defined by a powerful compulsion to control disturbing mental and body states (Cockell, Geller & Linden, 2002; Rasmussen-Hall, 2007). In my experience, newly diagnosed, medically stable patients who are not in complete denial about ED thoughts and behaviors can benefit from an ACT approach, as well as patients who have struggled long enough to recognize the time, money, energy, relationships, and life experiences that have been lost to their illness. Most of my patients desperately wish to get rid of their grinding, obsessive thoughts and preoccupation with body, food, and weight, as well as their compulsion to starve, binge, purge, or exercise. Yet despite this wish to be free, their attachment to rigid, and self-limiting ED “rules” keeps them trapped, as shown by these patients’ comments: e “I am so sick of the food rules, but I could never be happy at this weight so I cannot give them up.” e “I was planning to add the yogurt this week. But when it came down to it, I knew I wouldn’t gain weight if I ate my cereal-bar and pretzels, and I just didn’t know what would happen if I ate the yoghurt too.”

e “I was doing really well (on vacation). And then one day there was a buffet table with these little mini-cream puffs, and without thinking I popped one in my mouth. After I swallowed I realized what I’d done. I couldn’t stop thinking about the disgusting cream and dough in my stomach, and I just had to get rid of it. I grabbed some more in a napkin and ate them in the bathroom. Then I turned and threw up. I’ve been back at it every day since.”

It may seem counterintuitive, but ACT interventions are not intended to challenge the content of irrational or destructive thoughts and rules. Instead, progress occurs when thoughts that drive the ED are accepted for what they aredmental constructions spawned by associations between events that are now triggered reflexively (Hayes, Barnes-Holmes


166

10. NEW PATHWAYS

& Roche, 2001). Therapists often hear how associations between feeling bad, not eating, and in some way feeling better or “in control” can be traced to an event such as this one: Right after he broke up with me he started dating the skinniest girl in our class. I felt so bad, I could hardly eat. When I started to lose weight it felt good when people complimented me. That’s when I started to restrict on purpose, and the more weight I lost the better I felt. It was like the one thing I could do to feel in control.

When events are associated like this, separate thoughts and the impulses they evoke can become fused, as if they were one. Thereafter, whenever any part of this fused thought is triggered by, for example, feelings of loss, rejection or anxiety, the entire fused thought arises as well, e.g., feeling lonely, can’t stand it, don’t eat, feel better. Over time any stress-inducing emotion can become associated and fused to this thought (Blackledge, 2007). In this way an ED mind may begin. As stated above, a therapist using ACT does not respond as if a person’s thoughts are “wrong,” nor do we use rational arguments in an effort to convince him or her to “not think” or “not feel” as he or she does. Instead we begin by encouraging patients to examine their own experience to see what has helped and not helped in support of their most deeply held values. In doing so, patients may recognize that past efforts to stop or escape difficult mind states have not only not succeeded (or did so only momentarily), but that avoidance has caused their lives to spin ever more out of control. Patients see with their own eyes that, paradoxically, attempts to control thoughts or feelings in this way inevitably evoke more thoughts about it. Trying not to think about a tree evokes thoughts of a tree, and if you have any strong feelings about trees, these will probably come up as well. In the same way, “Don’t think about eating” evokes thoughts about food as well as feelings and impulses associated with eating. For someone with BN, “Stop thinking about the cream and dough in your stomach,” is likely to evoke even more thoughts and anxiety, including “I can’t stand it!” followed by a compulsion to purge. “Stop feeling lonely,” not only will not stop loneliness, it may also evoke anger or shame about being alone and, for someone with an ED, an impulse to escape these feelings through symptom use. Repeated actions chosen for the purpose of avoiding difficult thoughts or feelings, which ACT calls experiential avoidance, actually amplify problems over time (Hayes, Wilson, Gifford, Follette & Strosahl, 1996). A patient who turns away from unpleasant internal states by using ED behaviors will enjoy transitory relief, but will reinforce the association between distress and this avoidant action in the future. I tell patients that this is like exercising a “thoughtmuscle”: the more a person acts on impulses to avoid difficult thoughts and emotions, the stronger and more destructive these impulses become. Early in our work, I teach patients and their families that once ED thoughts, feelings, and impulses have taken up residence in the mind, a willful decision alone cannot prevent them from arising. That said, rather than being a slave to these impulses, patients can learn to “step back” and look at their thoughts instead of viewing the world from them. Mindfulness is a 2millennium-old method for creating this observing perspectivedi.e., for watching the mind thinkdthat is now well-substantiated (Kabat-Zinn, 2005). Mindfulness teaches that in any present moment there is a “me” that is thinking and a “me” that can “watch myself think.” When patients first experience this, I often ask, “Who is watching?” Most become curious about this transcendent or observing self. They begin to see that it is possible to view both their


ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY IN A NUTSHELL

167

self and their thoughts within a bigger context than they previously knew, creating a space in which new possibilities can arise. ACT teaches mindfulness and cognitive defusion to help patients to watch what the mind says and does, rather than remaining a captive of its destructive and self-limiting concepts and rules. A large and growing body of research documents that the perspective from which thoughts are viewed can significantly change their impact (Begley, 2007). For example, a patient told me, “I can’t stand to feel fulldit makes me feel like I will blow up!” When fused with this thought, it seemed literally true to her. From this perspective, eating until full is akin to annihilation. After learning mindfulness she was able to observe this thought instead of being caught in it, and it became possible for her to say “I’m having the thought that if I feel full I will explode.” In the space that opened with this new perspective, she began to feel sad that the years of eating only morsels in order to obey this thought had forced her to withdraw from training as a potential Olympic figure skater. As she faced this loss, a glimmer of a new possibility arose. Might she be willing to have her ED thoughts, and even tolerate the anxiety they evoked without acting on them, if doing so meant she could again do something that deeply mattered to her, such as becoming a skating teacher? ACT’s overall therapeutic goal is to increase psychological flexibility; that is, to help patients ride out the inevitable waves of emotionally provocative thoughts and impulses while committing to steps that align with what really matters most in their lives. It provides a model of psychopathology and corresponding treatment interventions (Hayes et al., 2004b). The ACT processes can be divided into two groups: 1. The mindfulness and acceptance processes. Helping patients to face and accept difficult internal states, to employ mindfulness of the present moment versus being caught in the future or past, to defuse from fused thoughts, and to connect with the transcendent self versus the conceptual self. 2. The commitment and action processes. Using mindfulness and the transcendent self to connect with chosen values, and commit to actions that align with these. In what follows, I will briefly introduce each ACT process and offer examples of how these can be effective with ED patients. While ACT processes can be discussed separately, quite often the therapist and patient may be working on multiple interdependent and overlapping processes in a single exchange. Practitioners who want to learn more about ACT will find information about books, articles and notices of training opportunities at www.contextualpsychology.org. Learning ACT; An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skills-Training Manual for Therapists (Luoma, Hayes & Walser, 2007) is a particularly useful guide. A self-help workbook for patients with AN utilizing ACT principles is also available (Heffner & Eifert, 2004). That said, it is really impossible to “get” ACT without practicing it in your own life. ACT is challenging to patients and therapists alike because it conflicts with some of the basic tenets of Western thought, such as that “Pain is bad,” “Happiness depends on feeling good (“feel-goodism”),” and “If you just work hard enough you can get whatever you want.” Therapists are often hooked by these beliefs in ways that are not that different from our patients’dI know I have been. It’s not that we must overcome all our foibles to help others, but that we must see these for what they are. It has taken me time and practice to integrate ACT into my work. The willingness to continually ask,


168

10. NEW PATHWAYS

“What do I do when faced with pain?” is a key aspect of this. The results have been both professionally and personally rewarding.

THE ACT PROCESSES Willingness and Acceptance versus Experiential Avoidance When suffering knocks at your door and you try to say there is no seat for him, he tells you not to worry because he has brought his own stool. (Achebe, 1967, p. 84)

Life includes hardship and pain. What we want, or need, we may not get. What we have, we will eventually lose. There is no avoiding it. This is not negative or pessimistic, but a fundamental truth. I routinely share with patients what wise teachers have taught me: “Pain is inevitable. Misery is not.” It is by repeatedly trying to run away from pain that we experience increased suffering. Like a Chinese finger trap, the harder we try to pull free, the more we are locked in. Whether ED patients express pain openly and directly or not, we know it is their very effort to escape their worried minds that ensnares them. ACT proposes that language and verbal problem solving skillsdone of the functions distinguishing humans from animalsdsets us up to not merely have hardship and pain, but to suffer more because we try to run away from it. Two contrasting responses to fear show how this works: With his shoe caught on the track and a train approaching, Adam felt panic. He quickly decided to sacrifice his shoe rather than be run-down. Slipping it off, he scrambled to safety. What a relief.

Devising strategies to get out of difficult situations like Adam’s has brought civilization a long way. Escape works well for solving many problems in the external world where we are dealing with hard data or tangible objects over which we have significant control or influence. Paradoxically, when this same rational strategy is used to escape internally generated problems, an added level of suffering may be created: In her first day at her new school Jill felt a wave of panic as she walked into the noisy, crowded lunchroom. Quickly she decided to forego lunch rather than eat alone. Slipping out the door, she headed for the library. What a relief.

While Jill avoided her anxiety by leaving the lunchroom, neither her hunger for food nor social connections are as expendable as Adam’s shoe. Used occasionally, experiential avoidance is not a problem, but unless Jill becomes willing to face her anxiety and deal with it in another way, she may unintentionally cause herself more problems. Repeatedly skipping lunch may make it harder to concentrate in afternoon classes, be the catalyst for an after school eating binge, or, if she is genetically vulnerable, it may plant the seeds for an association between the sensation of hunger and emptiness, relief from anxiety, and a feeling of being “in control.” In a culture where the thin-ideal is paramount, skipping the lunchroom scene may also provide an added “reward” if over time it results in weight loss that invites a compliment. In the meantime, Jill is learning nothing about her social anxiety, becoming


THE ACT PROCESSES

169

dependent on avoidance as a means of coping, and is likely to remain isolated and alone in her new school.

Two Types of Pain ACT distinguishes between two types of discomfort, “clean” and “dirty.” “Clean discomfort” is the natural consequence of coming into contact with a painful event such as sickness or injury, but also situations like rejection, abandonment, or a threat to our integrity. Mary provides an example: Growing up I was fat and was teased about it. Even though I had friends, it was a nightmare when other kids circled around me on the playground and called me names. Sometimes they pushed me down and even kicked me.

Anyone can relate to the terrible pain in thisdso much so that we would consider denial of pain to be pathological. This pain is horrible, but it is primary, normal, and “clean.” In contrast, “dirty discomfort” is the added suffering that arises from the stories we tell ourselves to escape our unavoidable pain. Mary continues: “I told my mother and she talked to the teacher, but it didn’t help.” [This is a sound and reasonable effort to eliminate a problem in the external world. Unfortunately, it didn’t work in this instance.] “I was fat and fatness is disgusting.” [This is the start of a storydwhether or not she was fat, if her fatness is the problem, rather than the bullies, maybe she can do something to gain control.] “So my mother took me to Weight Watchers in the fourth grade.” [This effort is chosen as a means to fix the problem, but it is based on denial of the complex contributors to weight and a false belief that weight can be reliably controlled through dieting.] “I lost about 20 pounds, but then I gained it all back, which really made me hate myself. So then I sort of felt I deserved what I got, and I’ve been at it (dieting/binge eating) ever since.” [Denial of the predictable results of dieting, self-blame, and shame is better than having no control over an unsafe world. If it is her fault, she can maintain the illusion that the world is safe and people will be kind when she loses weight; i.e., she can fix the problem, or be in control.] “All I can do is keep trying to lose weight. But now I am fatter than ever and can’t eat without bingingdit just proves what a failure I am.”

It is bad enough that this woman has suffered teasing. But it is the fatally flawed and selfperpetuating storydcourageously developed to help her avoid further pain, and based on highly promoted myths about fatness, dieting, and the workability of “weight control”dthat offers her no way out. This story has triggered her ED. We cannot expect our patients to face and accept what is not in their power to control simply because we tell them it’s a good idea. We can help them begin to see with their own eyes how their efforts to deny or avoid an unwanted reality through rigid adherence to eating, exercise, or other weight-related rules and behaviors have created ever more pain. Fostering a sense of what ACT calls creative hopelessness is an example of a method for heightening awareness of the self-perpetrating cycles of failure that naturally occur when we try again and again to control something that is not in our power to control. Metaphors like struggling to get out of quicksand, or of a hamster on a wheel, can help patients to see that it is not that they should try harder, but that they are trying to do something that cannot work. The following exchange demonstrates how fostering a sense of creative hopelessness in Mary began to undermine her belief in experiential avoidance.


170

10. NEW PATHWAYS

Kater: So all your life you have had this fear that people will look at you and judge you for being fat and your mind tells you have to lose weight because of this. You know I understand this is a realistic fear in our weightist world. A lot of ignorant people don’t know how weight is determined and might look at you and decide you have spent your whole life eating ice cream and watching TV. But the thing I want to know is, how many years have you been trying to lose weight? Mary: Since I was ten, so.eighteen years. Kater: Eighteen. That’s a long time. And how has this worked? Did you lose weight and stay slim until recently? Mary: (Frustrated) No. I’ve lost weight a hundred times, but I always gain it back. I’m fatter than ever. I can’t stand it. I will never be happy until I can lose weight and make it stick! Kater: So you’ve spent more than half your life trying to lose weight and keep it off, and thinking that when this happens you can finally be happy. But in all this time, every time you’ve lost weight you’ve only gained back more. Has it ever occurred to you that maybe you’re trying to make something happen that just isn’t doable; that maybe trying to force bodies to be a certain size isn’t what Mother Nature intended, and it just backfires? Mary: So you’re saying that to recover from my ED I have to accept being fat? Kater: I’m not saying anything about your size, actually. What I’m asking you to consider is whether the battle you’ve been waging with your weight for the past 18 years is any closer to being won after all this time. Or has it just been like running on a hamster wheeldthe more you have tried to lose weight, the more it has consumed

your time and energy, and in the end you are not getting what you want, and suffering just as much as when you started? Mary: NodI try and try! I must be doing something wrong. Oh I hate this! Kater: I understand how painful this is for you Mary. But let’s try to lay it all out here. And so, in terms of what you’ve told me is of value to you in your life, your family, your work, your spiritual growthdhas the energy you have invested into fighting this battle helped or hindered you in those areas? Mary: Well, hindered. A lot. I feel like a failure every day because I hate my body and all I think about is food. I get so depressed. Kater: So I’d just like you to think about this. What if the very fact of trying to escape your body’s natural disposition is what’s trapping youdconsuming your time and energy day in and out with no end in sightdwhile in the meantime. Mary: But my doctor says I need to control my weight and I don’t want to be fat. I could never accept this body! Kater: Ok. I understand this is what you feel. And I’m not asking you to change how you feel or whether you want to be fat or not. What I’m asking is: how well have your efforts to reduce your body size over the past eighteen years worked? I’m also asking whether this effort is helping or hindering you from being the person you would want to hear talked about at the end of your life in your eulogy. Whether or not you want to be fat is not what I’m asking. I hear you saying that this is not what you would prefer. But it does seem that your efforts to change this have consumed years of your life while in the end the size of your body is still not in your control.


COGNITIVE DEFUSION VERSUS FUSION

171

Through this exchange Mary became willing to face this difficult reality for the first time. Instead of her failing, she was trying to do the unworkable. This was not the end of her struggle or the last time she would revisit it, but her acceptance created a space to talk about what she could do instead to develop a healthier, more successful, and therefore happier relationship with food, her body, and her life.

COGNITIVE DEFUSION VERSUS FUSION Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. The Wizard of Oz (LeRoy & Fleming, 1939)

While Mary became willing to begin the process of learning how to eat rather than diet, harsh judgments about her size, fears about becoming fat, and strong impulses to restrict still dominated her thoughts. ACTwould say that these difficult thoughts were fused, and that until they are defused, she will remain tortured by their content. With cognitive fusion the content of words, and the events that are associated with them, become one and the same. For example, a person who has learned to fear snakes will see a snake and automatically think “danger.” While “snake” and “danger” are actually two thoughts, when fused they are experienced as one literally true thought: Snakes are dangerous. In turn, rules about how to respond to snakes become associated, and also become fusedd“since this, then that.” Fused rules become indisputable guides for behavior: Snake, danger, run! No alternative perspective seems possible. Those suffering from ED provide endless examples of fused thinking. Our patients’ fixed, rigid, and negative associations to words such as “fat,” a number on a scale, or their image in a mirror are irrefutable; perception, thought, and action are one. Rules about how to avoid the inherent “danger” of these threats in turn become fused, as if following these rules is the only possible way to stay “safe.” ED thoughts are thus multiple associated thoughts that have become fused, and are experienced as an indisputable fact. For example: “fatness is disgustingdeating causes fatdyou cannot eat (or must burn all calories eaten).” Cognitive fusion is always limiting, but it is not always problematic. When the earth was viewed as flat, people believed exploring was out of the question, but, for most people, this limited perspective did not cause trouble. On the other hand, the effects of fusion in regard to provocative or difficult emotions can range from missed opportunities for enjoyment to severe disturbances in thinking or mood. Consider these examples: You are taking a wonderful walk in a beautiful forest when you see a large snake in the path ahead. You scream and run away. Associating this path with danger, you never walk there again and never learn that what you saw was a piece of rope. At age 12 your patient was teased about her mature figure. She learned to feel ashamed and self-conscious, and vowed to never “invite” those comments again. She began the first of many starvation diets, triggering anorexia, and later bulimia. She never learned it was her classmates’ insensitivity that was wrong, not her body’s size and shape. At age 8 your patient was reading when her dad appeared, led her to the garage, committed incest and gave her a candy bar. Her mother was a depressed alcoholic, and there was no one to tell. She ate the candy bar, which gave some comfort, and pretended things were fine. By the time the violations ceased, eating sweets was the only thing she knew that could soothe her despair and loneliness, but the compulsion to eat sugar was also her greatest shame. She never learned that this shame belonged entirely to her father.


172

10. NEW PATHWAYS

When thoughts are fused we miss the fact that thinking is something we do that may or may not reflect the truth, and may or may not be helpful. For example, when a patient thinks, “If I eat these potatoes my thighs will become grotesque and everyone will shun me,” the world as colored by that thought seems so real, it is as if she is not interacting with thoughts at all. Instead of a mental construction, she is dealing with being a monster and deserving isolation. The loss of behavioral and emotional flexibility in ED sufferers is made more understandable by the concept of fusion. Why would anyone eat a potato if they believed what she does, and wouldn’t everyone want a rule excluding potatoes? From the ACT perspective, this patient is responding rationally to the world as she is experiencing it, but missing the fact that she is “languaging” about it. When a 14 year-old, beautiful by any standard, girl says, “You don’t understand; at my school, looks are everything. If I don’t lose ten pounds before fall I might as well not even go to high school,” she is not dealing with a thought, but the literal end of her high school career. From this point of view, the adaptive functions of risky ED rules become understandable. There are many ways to demonstrate “fused thinking” to patients. I sometimes take down a small painting from my office wall, asking them to hold it with their nose touching the glass. All agree that from this vantage point they can’t really see it for what it is. To “know” this painting requires a little distance. In a similar way, if we are “one with our thoughts” it is hard to see them for what they are. Since ED patients must learn to recover in spite of their fused thoughts, ACT teaches cognitive defusion to help them step back and see these for what they are, “just thoughts” that may or may not be helpful. Using mindfulness, patients can develop the ability to observe their thoughts and to consider them more dispassionately. The thought, “Augh! I am so fat and disgusting,” is very different from the thought, “My mind is having the thought that I am fat and my mind is also having the thought that because I am fat, I am disgusting.” Instead of asking, “What are you thinking about the sandwich you just ate?” I might ask “What can you notice your mind is thinking about that sandwich?” A patient who had a rare day all to herself told me: “I have really, really been thinking since getting up this morning that I could skip lunch and no one would know.” She had begun learning mindfulness to defuse her thoughts, and so I asked: “What are you going to do with that thought?” After several moments passed she said: “I am going to say, ‘Thanks mind, I know you are trying to help me, but after all these years, following your advice has led me down a path I never want to see again.’ I’ll go home and make a lunch to take with me.” Those unfamiliar with mindfulness may wonder whether desperately anxious patients can realistically be able to look at versus from their thoughts. I do not mean to gloss over the deep struggle and the need for practice and repetition it may take for patients to learn to use defusion like this. That said, most patients willing to work with these methods do experience a sustainable paradigm shift regarding how they view their thoughts and feelings and the degree to which they feel controlled by them. When patients become aware of the observing mind as distinct from the thinking mind, we can ask: “Which part of your mind do you think has your best interest at heart?” If the patient draws strength from spiritual or religious beliefs, I might ask: “Which part of your mind do you think is more connected to God?” or “Which part of your mind is more connected to the universe?”


MINDFULNESS AS AN INTERVENING ACTION VERSUS BEING LOST IN THE FUTURE OR PAST

173

The shift in the way patients relate to their thoughts differently becomes evident in comments such as: I was walking in to the reunion, and my mind started thinking “You are so fat and stupid and ugly. You should go home.” But my observing mind saw this coming, and I know that this is what my thinking mind does when I am scared. I also knew I would be sorry if I left. I’ve been looking forward to this reunion for months. So I went on in and my thinking mind was still yelling at me, but I just ignored it and started talking to people.

I often recommend the biographical motion picture A Beautiful Mind (produced by Brian Grazer and Ron Howard, Universal Studies, U.S.A., 2001) to patients because it is a remarkable demonstration of how literally true and powerful thoughts can seem to be, even when they are, in fact, delusions. This movie also depicts a great example of cognitive defusion. When the central character, Nobel Prize winning mathematician John Nash, observes and understands his hallucinations for what they are, he learns to just “see” them without responding to them as real, and in turn becomes free to live his life without being controlled by them. Just as our patient’s minds may continue to produce ED thoughts even well along in recovery, Nash’s mind continues to produce hallucinations throughout the rest of his life. In a closing scene Nash says: “I’ve gotten used to ignoring them and I think, as a result, they’ve kind of given up on me. I think that’s what it’s like with all our dreams and our nightmares, Martin, we’ve got to keep feeding them for them to stay alive.” Cognitive defusion can help ED patients stop feeding their thoughts.

MINDFULNESS AS AN INTERVENING ACTION VERSUS BEING LOST IN THE FUTURE OR PAST Meditation. helps us return to our true self. (Nhat Hanh, 1987, p. 8)

A thought cannot see itself. In order to work with thoughts, patients need a way to observe them with sufficient calmness to resist acting on them. This is particularly true for fused thoughts that are so intractable, anxiety provoking, and demanding. While thinking about a thought in hindsight can improve insight, responding differently the next time it arises requires learning to be aware of and observe it as it is happening. Mindfulness is a method for watching the mind think without judgment or action in order to see ourselves in a bigger context, connect with what is most important, and make choices that help rather than hinder our lives. A significant and growing body of research on mindfulness and neuroplasticity has documented that attention to, and awareness of, thoughts, in other words pure mental activity alone, can improve mental health (Begley, 2007). Apparently, thinking about thoughts in a new way can even lead to measurable changes in the brain’s hard wiring. Given the frequent co-occurrence between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and ED, it is notable that research with OCD patients who were taught mindfulness methods, and who learned to re-label their thoughts and urges as “an event in the mind caused by brain circuitry,” reported after only one week that they did not feel their disease was controlling them. PET scans performed on OCD patients before and after ten weeks of mindfulness-based therapy showed that activity in the pre-frontal cortex, where OCD thoughts are triggered, had


174

10. NEW PATHWAYS

diminished dramatically (Schwartz & Begley, 2002). While I have not seen such rapid responses with my ED patients, I have found mindfulness to be very effective in reducing the power of their intrusive and obsessive thoughts and worries. There are a variety of different models for teaching and learning mindfulness. ACT offers structured exercises for bringing attention and awareness to the present moment for the purpose of observing our thoughts for what they are, transcending our limited self-stories, and connecting with our values. I personally have learned mindfulness through the Buddhist tradition (Nhat Hanh, 1999), but I teach my patients the secular model pioneered by Kabat-Zinn (2005) in his work with stress reduction. In this model, I begin by asking patients to sit comfortably, but upright, relaxing into the chair beneath them, feeling its support rising up to securely hold them, eyes either closed or gazing without focus on a spot on the floor. I then instruct them to draw their attention to one part of the body after another, being aware of and feeling the sensations in each, noticing, but not holding on to any thoughts that might arise. With ED patients, we can expect that judging and anxiety may occur as the attention moves to different parts of the body. If this happens, they should just notice it and label it as such: “judging, feeling anxious,” and then return their attention to awareness of the physical sensation in that body part. I try to avoid potentially triggering words, drawing attention, for example, to their rib cage as it protects their digestive organs, rather than their tummy. Patients then turn their attention to their breathing. “Breathing in, know that you are breathing in. Breathing out, know that you are breathing out.” We know that the mind will wander, because this is the nature of mind, so it is important to tell our perfectionistic patients to expect this. Thoughts will shoot into the future or the past and evaluate the present: “this is boring, how many calories were in that muffin, I need to call Sally, that truck noise is annoying, when will I ever feel better .?” When they notice their attention has been taken over by thinking, they should just acknowledge this, “thinking mind, worrying mind, etc.” and, without judgment, return their attention to their breath, which serves as an anchor to the present moment. They are not doing something “wrong” when their attention drifts; rather, the point of mindfulness is merely to observe what the mind does, including how scattered it is. Most importantly, they can begin to realize that their thoughts are not who they are, but merely events that come and go and that can be watched without requiring action. I urge patients to practice mindfulness at home, but this is especially difficult for patients who are anxious or driven. Knowing this, I encourage them to incorporate ordinary mindfulness into everyday life. Mindful breathing while sitting at a traffic light, standing in a line, stopping to look mindfully at one leaf on a tree, feeling the sunshine on their cheek, and walking slowly in rhythm with their in and out breath are examples of non-triggering opportunities for mindfulness. I tell patients that this “ordinary” mindfulness is necessary practice for using mindfulness when they are experiencing triggering thoughts. In the following example, a patient with bulimia reported using mindfulness when she had been triggered by a bite of potato salad: I was completely hooked by my thinking. My mind was screaming “You idiot! Why did you let yourself think you could eat one bite of that potato salad! You know you are as fat as a pig with no self control. Now you will have to go home and binge and purge.” So I went to my car, and I was already thinking about the binge foods I would buy on the way home. But


SELF AS CONTEXT VERSUS ATTACHMENT TO THE CONCEPTUALIZED SELF

175

then I thought, why not try some of this mindfulness stuff before starting the car. If it doesn’t help, you can still binge and purge. And so I did mindful breathing right there in the car for about 10 minutes, and I was surprised at how I calmed down. Even between breaths I was still planning what I would get at 7-Eleven, but in between I started to see that another part of me was really scared of meeting new people at this party. I could sort of see that even though my mind was thinking one bite of potato salad was terrible, it really isn’t. I kind of think now this was just an excuse to run away. Binging and purging have always been the best way I know to do this. So I did go home, but instead of feeling disgusted with myself, I was feeling kind of sad that I have always been so shy. And I thought, if I binge and purge that would just make me feel worse. So I played the piano for a long time, and I went to bed, and I was glad.

Eating mindfully has been shown to be effective in helping people to tune into body cues of fullness and satiety (Bly, Hammond, Thomson & Bagdade, 2007), but mindfulness can also help patients choose to face, without judgment or action, rather than avoid, difficult thoughts and feelings that occur while eating. What follows is how I might lead a mindful eating exercise with a patient who was not yet willing to risk an experience of feeling full. As you eat your lunch, look closely at each food on your plate. Where did this food come from? Where did it grow? How many elements is it made up ofdwater, soil nutrients, sun? Who may have planted and tended the seeds it grew from? Imagine what they might have eaten to give them energy to tend to this food? As you begin to eat, pay attention to the texture and flavor of each forkful. Think about the nutrients this food contains, how your muscles and brain need these, and why your hunger for this food is important. Picture the food as it arrives in your stomach. Allow yourself to be aware that it has to take up some space there, just as it takes up some space on your plate, so naturally your stomach will have to expand to allow for this. Just relax and notice the thoughts and feelings that arise as you allow yourself to face this reality. If you get too anxious, just return to watching your breath as it flows in and out past your nostrils. When you are calmer, notice what your mind is telling you about this food in your stomach. If you notice judgments or anxious feelings, just name these: judging thoughtsdworried thoughts, and let them go. You could even say, ‘Thank you mind, I know you want to protect me with these thoughts, but I am trying a different way’dand then let your thoughts glide away like leaves in a stream. Bringing your attention back to your breath, let yourself be aware that attention to the activities you carry out this afternoon will be more possible because of the energy provided by this food. To carry enough energy with you for this, your tummy must be full. If your waistband has to be a little tight for this to be possible, might you be willing to experience this if it meant you could be free from food cravings while you do your work?

As with all of aspects of ACT, it is not possible to teach mindfulness without having used it in one’s own life. For treatment providers inexperienced in this method for observing the mind, guidance is offered in the books referenced above and in both non-secular and secular classes that are increasingly common in most cities and communities.

SELF AS CONTEXT VERSUS ATTACHMENT TO THE CONCEPTUALIZED SELF knowing what you know and knowing what you do not knowdthat is the beginning of knowledge. (Confucius, 551e479 BCE; as cited in Li, 1999, p. 26)

ACT holds that there are two ways of understanding “self;” as the “knower” and as the “known.” The known, or conceptualized self, arises out of fusion with the content of our experiencesdout of all the many ways we learn to proclaim “I am ____.” It incorporates all the stories we begin to believe and act on about ourselves as if this sense of self was literally


176

10. NEW PATHWAYS

“true.” ACT doesn’t suggest that there is anything inherently wrong with an identity based on conceptualizations, and socially it can even be helpful as we interact with others in ways that are predictable and understandable. But what works well interpersonally can also trap us in patterns that are unworkable and even destructive. If we are glued to an identity that dictates a limited perspective on possibilities, we may not be able to get what we need to be happy. For example, an ED patient whose identity was based on her membership in a doctrinaire religious group was wracked with guilt when years of self-sacrifice left her still lonely and resentful. She saw no alternative to her story, which included the thought: “When I have sacrificed enough, I will be loved and happy.” This story offers no way out, and so her ED offered the only relief she could imagine. For ED sufferers, the conceptualized self reflects a story they have come to tell about themselves that then dictates the life they are able to live. “I cannot eat without binging,” but her restriction leads to binging. “I have to weigh less than X pounds to feel acceptable,” but X is never good enough. “I am fat and alone and food is my only comfort,” but relying on food limits contact with other people. There are no possible solutions within the stories that define these patients’ conceptualized selves. ACT does not try to convince people that their stories are irrational or wrong. Instead, therapists working within this model help patients to see these stories for what they are: self-limiting conceptualizations of who they are. Using mindfulness to rise above this view, the self as context can be distinguished. This bigger, observing self is transcendent, continuous, and stableddistinct from the thinking, feeling, impulsive, ego driven mind. The ACT literature is rich with metaphors and experiential exercises to help patients connect with self as concept, or observing self. One well-known exercise is to have a patient imagine him- or herself as the driver of a bus full of noisy, unruly passengers all of whom are yelling the worst possible insults and demands at him or her. The passengers represent all of the patient’s harsh, self-limiting thoughts, ED or otherwise, such as “you are so boring, too fat, undisciplined, lazy, too shy, a loser, impure.” The point is to help your patient see that, as the driver, he or she may be carrying around all these passengers, but they are not him or her. From this perspective your patient is free to steer the bus in the direction they choose, towards a destination that they have defined, still aware of, but not a slave to, these thoughts.

CONNECTING TO AND COMMITTING TO ACTION ALIGNED WITH CORE VALUES The Only Thing Greater Than the Power of the Mind is the Courage of the Heart. (A Beautiful Mind, produced by Brian Grazer and Ron Howard, Universal Studies, U.S.A., 2001)

As ED clinicians, we should never be satisfied that interruption of symptoms is enough to sustain recovery. As patients find the courage to face life without using ED behaviors, we must help them connect with alternatives that truly promise a better quality of life. A central component of ACT addresses the need for patients to connect with what is of greatest importance to them and what they want their life to stand for. What lesser cause could generate a willingness to face life head on and let go of behaviors that provide such an illusion of control? Values work is the part of ACT that I find to be the most meaningful and gratifying.


CONNECTING TO AND COMMITTING TO ACTION ALIGNED WITH CORE VALUES

177

It helps patients re-connect to parts of themselves that have been sorely neglected in the face of the all-consuming ED. Seeing the disparity between values and how we are actually living our lives is inevitably painful, particularly for those who are spending 80 to 95% of their daily waking time consumed by ED thoughts and behaviors. At the same time, becoming aware of the disparity brings hope. At these moments, you may see a light come on in your patient’s eyes as she talks about being a competitive tennis player before her BED added 100 pounds to her small frame and her knees became arthritic. You may hear a mother with anorexia who painstakingly prepares meals for her children connect with wanting to give them the benefit of actually eating meals along with them. You may see a college student, whose bulimia treatment has made him ineligible for the Peace Corps, dare to dream of what else he can do to make a difference. Anyone who has worked with ED patients understands that voluntarily surrendering compulsive behaviors requires tremendous courage and motivation that comes from a sense of purpose bigger than themselves. ACT publications offer numerous exercises to help patients connect with their values, identify behavioral implications of commitment to them, and recognize the sacrifices necessary to live up to them as well as the cost of not doing so. A table listing many of these appears in Learning ACT (Luoma et al., 2007, p. 133). The intention is for patients to become aware of what they would most deeply want to be able to say about their life if ED thoughts and impulses were not controlling their actions, i.e. “In a world where you could choose to have your life be about something, what would you choose?” (Wilson & Murrell, 2004, p. 135). When patients feel unable to move forward on the difficult road to recovery, values work shines a compelling light on why they must. ACT does not specify when values work should occur in the therapy process. I prefer to talk with patients about their hopes, dreams, and wishes very early on because this brings them face to face with how their ED makes the life they want to live impossible. This does bring pain to the surface, but this pain is often needed to compel movement. If time allows, even in an initial assessment, I will ask about values. We have been talking about your problems, but I’d like to hear about the rest of your life. What is really important to you? If your ED were not taking up so much of your time and energy, what would you be doing or want to be doing that you are not doing now? What kind of person do you most want to be? At the end of your life, what do you want to be able to say about yourself?

This set of questions is often like watering a seed that has lain on barren ground. It may wake up a part of them that the ED has suffocated. Following is a conversation illustrating how values work helped a 38-year-old woman with AN who had relapsed after her parents died.

Kater: Yah, those old thoughts and feelings are still there, aren’t they? Once they take up residence on a little neuro-pathway in your brain (I put my hand on the left side of my forehead and hold it there), painful

losses like you’ve experienced this year can wake them right up. And you know, those thoughts may always be there, riding around in your brain ready to harass you. The thing is, you can spend


178

10. NEW PATHWAYS

the rest of your life letting those thoughts control how you live, or you could even spend your life arguing with them. At the same time, if you have something more important to do, maybe you could just learn to smile and wave at them and say ‘I hear you little neuro-pathway. Thank you for your opinion.’ while you just keep on with what’s important. Let me ask you, in the face of so much that has happened that has made you feel so saddyour parents dying, your marital problems, all the things that are not in your control, including those rude passengers in your mind telling you not to eatdwhat is still there that is really of value to you? I wonder deep down, what is it that you want your life to stand for, in spite of everything. What still really matters? Joan: Thinks for some time. Well, I really want to be a good mother. Kater: Ok. Yes, of course. So. what does that mean? What would that look like to be a good mother, if you were doing it the way you imagine? Joan: (She tells of what people said at her mother’s recent funeral about how, with very few financial resources, her mother had kept her large family of 9 children closely knit.) I’d like to think my children would feel that way about me at my funeral. (She starts to cry.) I don’t think that’s very likely to happen the way things are going.

Kater: Ok. I understand. (I pause to let her cry.) So even though you feel discouraged right now, let’s say you were actually doing the kinds of things you would need to do to be the mother you’d like to be. If I could be a fly on the wall and really watch you taking the steps that align with your value of being a good mother, what would I see? What does a good mother do? Joan: Well, for one thing, she sits down and eats with her kids. (She is looking down.) Kater: (Giving time for this to sink in.) Joanne, look at me. (She does, slowly.) So in light of one of your most deeply held values, I wonder if there are any steps that you might be willing to take between now and when you come back that are in alignment with this vision of being a good mother? Joan: Well. maybe I could eat something with the kids at dinner.. Kater: How do you think the kids would respond to that? Joan: I think they’d be pretty shocked. (laughs) Kater: Shocked in a good way, or something else? Joan: No, in a good way. Kater: And what would that be like for you? Joan: (She is silent for a while.) I think I would really like to try it. Kater: And what about all the noisy, anxious thoughts that will be provoked in your mind? Joan: Well, they will still be there. It will be hard. I’ll just have to say, ‘Yah, yah, I hear you. You’ll never change. But I have to do this for my kids. This is more important.’

When we ask patients to face their pain and commit to actions that feel to them like jumping off a cliff, the foundation for this courage has to come from what really matters. While all mindfulness based therapies help patients defuse from destructive thoughts and emotions, I have found that ACT’s emphasis on connecting to deeply held values, and both the recognition of and commitment to the steps needed to align with these, has added a powerful


CLOSING NOTE

179

motivational piece to my work. Putting this into practice has made some form of the following question very familiar to my patients: Do you think it would be possible to have this ED thought and to be terrified not to obey it, and to still go ahead and do .(a valued non-ED action for this patient) anywaydknowing that one of your deepest wishes in life is to .(a coinciding deeply valued direction). and that to fulfill this value means you have to be able to take this step?

CLOSING NOTE While I have found ACT to be useful in my work with ED patients, I still use an eclectic bag of therapeutic approaches when called for. Clearly, the most important of these is the use of myself. It goes without saying that ACT processes cannot be applied without a great deal of compassion and love for our patients, understanding of their pain, and our deepest respect for the difficult road they are on. In addition to this, I add an educational component. I always teach the following basic truths: (i) there are wholesale limits to “weight management” through healthy means; (ii) size diversity is inevitable; (iii) weight loss as a goal, and dieting in particular, are intrinsically flawed methods and are likely to lead to weight gain; and (iv) regardless of size, from very fat to very thin, a healthy weight can only be determined by observing the outcome of healthy behaviors (i.e., wholesome eating and a reasonable amount of physical activity over time), never by a BMI chart, the size on a pair of jeans, or a reflection in a mirror. Our patients hear so many messages contradicting these facts every day; thus, it is essential to articulate them with authority from the start. Even though most ED thoughts are spawned by myths that deny biological reality, using hard data to argue with them is not helpful to most patients. Rather, we, as therapists, must convey empathy for the many experiences that created these skewed perspectives. While we should have no illusion that the facts alone will diminish ED thoughts and feelings, ED sufferers need to ultimately accept their dangerous thoughts for what they aredunworkable mental constructions based on fear. Making room for this reality can be transformative.

References Achebe, C. (1967). Arrow of God. New York, NY: Anchor Books (p. 84). Begley, S. (2007). Train your mind, change your brain. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. Blackledge, J. T. (2007). Disrupting verbal process: Cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy and other mindfulness-based psychotherapies. Psychological Record, 57, 555e576. Bly, T., Hammond, M., Thomson, R., & Bagdade, P. (2007). Exploring the use of mindful eating training in the bariatric population. Bariatric Times, NovembereDecember. Psychology Perspective 15e17. Cockell, S. J., Geller, S., & Linden, W. (2002). The development of a decisional balance scale for anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 10, 359e375. Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639e665. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.), (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum/Springer-Verlag. Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (Eds.), (2004a). Mindful and acceptance: Expanding the cognitivebehavioral tradition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.


180

10. NEW PATHWAYS

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1e25. Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2005). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Bunting, K., Twohig, M. P., & Wilson, K. G. (2004b). What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy? In S. C. Hayes, & K. D. Strosahl (Eds.), A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy (pp. 3e29) New York, NY: Springer. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152e1168. Heffner, M., Sperry, J. A., Eifert, G. H., & Detweiler, M. (2002). Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: A case example. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 232e236. Heffner, M., & Eifert, G. H. (2004). The anorexia workbook. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Wherever you go there you are; 10th Anniversary Edition. New York, NY: Hyperion. Kater, K. (2005). Healthy body image; teaching kids to eat and love their bodies too!. Seattle: National Eating Disorders Association. LeRoy, M. (Producer), & Fleming, V. (Director) (1939). The Wizard of Oz [Motion picture]. United States: MetroGoldwyn-Mayer. Li, D. H. (1999). The analects of Confucius: A new-millennium translation. Bethesda MD: Premier Publishing Company. Luoma, J. B., Hayes, S., & Walser, R. D. (2007). Learning ACT. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. Nhat Hahn, T. (1987). Being peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press. Nhat Hanh, T. (1999). The miracle of mindfulness. Boston: Beacon Press. Rasmussen-Hall, M. S. (2007). Distress intolerance, experiential avoidance, and alexithymia: Assessing aspects of emotion dysregulation in undergraduate women with and without histories of deliberate self-harm and binge/ purge behaviors. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 67(9-B), 5420. Schwartz, J. M., & Begley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. New York, NY: Regan Books. Simmons, A. M., Milnes, S. M., & Anderson, D. A. (2008). Factors influencing the utilization of empirically supported treatments for eating disorders. Eating Disorders, 16, 342e354. Tobin, D. L., Banker, J. D., Weisberg, L., & Bowers, W. (2007). I know what you did last summer (and it was not CBT): A factor analytic model of international psychotherapeutic practice in the eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 754e757. Wilson, K. G., & Murrell, A. (2004). Values work in acceptance and commitment therapy: Setting a course for behavioral treatment. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, & M. M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 120e151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.


C H A P T E R

11 Outpatient Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa following Weight Restoration Practical and Conceptual Issues Richard A. Gordon The treatment of patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) who are fully weight-restored allows for different priorities than the rehabilitation of those who are significantly underweight and brings new therapeutic challenges as well. Although the priority for weight gain no longer dominates the treatment process, this does not mean that the patient is “done” with that issue and no longer needs to address it. Treasure and Ward (1997) have pointed out that weight is always an issue in the treatment of AN. In fact, in a comparative study of patients who succeeded and those who failed at sustaining recovery after inpatient treatment (Cockell, Zaitsoff & Geller, 2004), those most likely to relapse had assumed that treatment was complete because they had restored their weight. Nonetheless, once the AN patient’s weight and physical status is stabilized, the process of a more complete psychosocial recovery begins. The term “relapse” in this chapter specifically refers to the broad range of eating disorder (ED) behaviors, thoughts, and feelings indicating a re-intensification of AN, with the most ominous warning signal for relapse being weight loss (see McGilley and Szablewski, Chapter 12, for the emerging literature on treatment outcome and the prediction of relapse). This chapter will center on the clinical issues that arise in the outpatient treatment of weightrestored patients following discharge from a hospital or residential center, focusing primarily on young adults in the college years. The existing literature is complex, but there is a consensus that vulnerability to weight relapse is highest within the first 12e18 months after discharge (Carter, Blackmore, Sutandar-Pinnock & Woodside, 2004; Strober, Freeman & Morrell, 1997). Many factors have been found to predict relapse, among them continuing body image (BI) concerns (Keel, Dorer, Franko, Jackson & Herzog, 2005), high levels of exercise at discharge (Strober et al., 1997), weight loss in the first weeks after discharge (Kaplan et al., 2009), and poor psychosocial functioning (Lowe et al., 2001). Treatment following discharge is a particularly urgent matter, best informed by a combination of research and clinical experience.


181


182

11. OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF ANOREXIA NERVOSA FOLLOWING WEIGHT RESTORATION

The following discussion is organized around a number of key issues that must be part of any overall treatment plan for a weight-restored patient. Until a strong evidence base suggests otherwise, clinicians must rely upon an eclectic approach, drawing upon knowledge and clinical experience about many issues and theoretical perspectives. The limited available evidence suggests that flexible and active clinical management is essential and probably more effective than more narrowly focused clinical protocols (McIntosh et al., 2005). The model proposed here includes a primary therapist working within a multi-modal, multidisciplinary clinical team and utilizing other resources where appropriate. Symptomatic issues such as weight and nutritional status, BI, and exercise are of primary concern in the early stages of treatment and recovery. However, in order for long-term recovery to be achieved, developmental, familial, and psychosocial issues ultimately need to be addressed to minimize the risk for relapse and to solidify full physical, psychosocial, and emotional recovery (Keel et al., 2005). Strategies for achieving these complex goals are discussed below using short clinical vignettes to illustrate some of the typical ambiguities and surprising outcomes of certain interventions.1 The final section of this chapter explores a promising clinical approach, Cognitive Analytic Therapy (CAT) (Ryle & Kerr, 2002), which integrates empirically validated psychotherapy techniques with a focus on the patient’s relational dynamics.

TRANSITIONING FROM INPATIENT TREATMENT Inpatient and residential treatment programs are powerful experiences. To ensure the patient’s successful transition to outpatient care, clinicians benefit from knowing the specifics of the inpatient program, and the qualities, both positive and negative, of its impact. My experience suggests that outpatient therapists need to have more information about this than they typically have. Ideally, some form of on-going contact is maintained (e.g., weekly progress reports, brief phone calls) between the primary inpatient therapist and the outpatient therapist during the patient’s treatment course. At the very least, these two therapists should have a pre-discharge discussion in order to carefully coordinate the transition, and the outpatient therapist should receive a discharge summary. Patients have a variety of feelings, ranging from highly positive to very negative, about their inpatient experiences. For some, the loss of autonomy is extremely traumatic. Conversely, others experience the environment of total immersion in a positive way, and feel uneasy with the anticipated lack of supervision when leaving the hospital. Again, it is important to know specifics about the patient’s unique experience in treatment. For example, does the patient miss the total supervision over meals that occurred in the program, and does he or she feel the need for greater structure on the outside to maintain healthy eating patterns? The treatment plan, designed in collaboration with an experienced nutritionist, should reflect the patient’s answer to this question. It is also important to know what aspects of the therapeutic program really “worked” for them. For example, 1

Clinical vignettes are for the most part composites of stories of actual patients, to disguise identity. For this purpose, certain details that are not relevant to the story have been altered.


BUILDING A TREATMENT TEAM

183

was the patient asked to do a specific form of journal-keeping that felt particularly powerful and might help him or her in an ongoing way? If patients feel that this or other techniques were beneficial and motivating, building them into the outpatient program is important, showing respect for the patient’s experience and building a bridge between residential and outpatient care. The shift from a round-the-clock therapeutic environment to, in some cases, once weekly sessions with a therapist is especially challenging. This is a drastic transition for a disorder as serious as AN, and the frequency is unlikely to be enough. Depending on the patient’s clinical state, as well as issues of accessibility, a day hospital or intensive outpatient program may be appropriate. Patients often need this level of containment and intensity to minimize their risk for relapse. Intensive treatment, either in a program or in intensive outpatient psychotherapy, can put a great strain on financial resources, as many insurance plans will not support this level of outpatient treatment. However, the costs of relapse, physically, psychologically, and financially are also significant. For the transition to outpatient care to succeed, frequent therapeutic contact is essential.

BUILDING A TREATMENT TEAM Patients who have been in a residential or intensive program are used to working with a treatment team. Establishing a cohesive team of outpatient clinicians is essential. In addition to the primary therapist, the three most important members are a psychopharmacologist, a physician or other primary care provider such as a physician assistant or nurse practitioner, and a nutritionist (see Tyson, Chapter 6; Croll, Chapter 8; and Levine & Levine, Chapter 7). Unless the issues are especially complicated, appointments with the medical provider and psychopharmacologist need only occur on a periodic basis. Nutritionists will typically prefer to see patients more frequently, especially in the early postdischarge stage. In addition to issues with dietary management, nutritionists can do weekly weights, communicating this information to the primary therapist as needed. Regular consultation between outpatient providers is especially critical to avoid the risks of splitting and to insure proper and timely coordination of care. For example, all treatment providers should be informed of significant changes in the patient’s weight status, nutritional challenges, or medication plans.

Psychopharmacologists Most psychiatrists who are conducting “split treatment” will be eager to have the primary therapist’s insights and diagnostic evaluations of the patient’s clinical state. The psychopharmacologist may also have insights and observations that will be helpful to the primary therapist. Historically, communication between psychiatrists and non-medical therapists has often been delicate. However, in the current environment, in which the use of medication is ubiquitous, the collaboration between providers is typically more collegial. As illustrated in the following vignette, non-medical clinicians, regardless of discipline, need to bear in mind that the final decisions about the use of medications is, of necessity, in the hands of the medical professional.


184


Catherine had done very well in an intensive residential program in the Midwest and had returned to college after a medical leave of absence. She was highly engaged in the first months of her treatment and was able to maintain her weight and normalized eating patterns. She did have some persistent issues with BI, which we were able to work on. However, as is typical of weightrestored anorexics, problems with anxiety and mood fluctuation came to the fore following her inpatient treatment. She noticed that she would go from “high” to “low” even within the space of a single therapy session. I sensed that we had uncovered an atypical mood disorder, of the rapid cycling variety. She had been discharged from the hospital on sertraline, which she continued to take and tolerate well. I suggested that the psychopharmacologist evaluate her for bipolar disorder and consider a mood-stabilizing medication. The pharmacologist agreed that there was a problem, but he did not want to treat aggressively with a medication that could very possibly induce weight gain and other side effects. The clinical decision, therefore, was to “ride out the storm.” In fact, the patient’s symptoms normalized over time and turned out to be both a product of her temperament but also of difficult situational adjustments that she was having after treatment.

Medical Providers Medical providers with ED expertise are essential members of the outpatient treatment team (Tyson, Chapter 6). Family practitioners, adolescent medicine specialists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can all play an important role in the ongoing medical management of patients with AN. The following example illustrates the critical role of medical providers when patients relapse.

Sara was discharged after a 3-month hospitalization for treatment of her bulimic symptoms. Underweight prior to her hospitalization, she was discharged at a weight slightly higher than her target weight range. Sara had deeply resented her hospitalization, comparing it to a form of imprisonment. She had begun, however, to see the need to be at a more stable body weight. Sara had some particularly difficult conflicts in her family-of-origin (with whom she went back to live with before returning to school), and especially with her mother, whom she found excessively controlling and demanding. Her physical state was being monitored by her pediatrician, who was concerned with her low levels of chloride and potassium (both associated with poor food intake and vomiting). Although Sara was making some progress in examining her interpersonal and family issues in therapy, a part of her was still invested in maintaining a low body weight. She had found it difficult to tolerate the sensation of fullness, fearing that she had eaten more food than she should have. She admitted that she was still vomiting, although it was difficult to get a straight answer about frequency. When her therapist returned from a two-week holiday, it was clear that she had lost substantial weight. Obviously, treatment of developmental and interpersonal issues could not proceed in light of her impending relapse. The physician insisted that she needed to be hospitalized due to her deteriorating electrolyte functioning. Sara’s blatantly transferential description of her physician was that “she is my mother in a white coat.” In collaboration with her therapist, instead of


BUILDING A TREATMENT TEAM

185

re-admitting her to a long-term program, the physician arranged for admission on an emergency basis to a medical ward of a local community hospital, where she was placed on IV infusions to improve her electrolyte status. This brief, non-psychiatric hospitalization was actually a turning point in Sara’s treatment. She knew that she had to relinquish the fantasy of extreme thinness and accept what was probably her genetic destiny to be a full-figured woman. In fact, after the emergency hospitalization, she began to associate a more normal weight with the image of herself as a “strong, athletic woman,” rather than seeing herself as “fat, just like my mother.”

Nutrition Specialists In an ad libitum eating test, Sysko, Walsh, Schebendach & Wilson (2005) found that AN patients improved caloric intake after weight restoration, but were still significantly restricting compared to healthy control subjects. Many weight-restored AN patients continue to struggle with urges to restrict, dramatically raising the risk of relapse. Adding a nutritionist to the treatment team helps to address these issues. Nutritionists who specialize in ED typically work with food diaries to obtain a realistic assessment of the patient’s caloric intake. To avoid redundancy, clinicians also utilizing food journals as part of their cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach should coordinate this procedure with the nutritionist. The nutritionist is often a key figure in the patient’s psychological life as well, and many develop a sophisticated understanding of the dynamics of these illnesses. This creates a fruitful area for therapists and nutritionists to share and enhance their mutual clinical understanding of the patient, especially if they maintain frequent contact.

Michele was a highly motivated 18-year-old college student with AN who reached a healthy and stable weight range during her residential treatment. She connected with an experienced nutritionist at home prior to returning to school in the Northeast. Once back in school, she sought intensive, twice weekly psychotherapy. From the beginning, Michele expressed her desire to maintain telephone contact with the nutritionist from home. As this seemed important to her, I agreed, although it is generally easier to utilize the local resources for nutrition therapy. After a number of months, the patient observed that the messages from both of us were highly consistent; we were essentially “saying the same things, but in a different language.” This is of particular interest, as we had rather different (although not conflicting) philosophies. My approach was primarily dynamic and interpersonal, while the nutritionist emphasized spiritual recovery and motivational factors. It is quite possible, however, that these differences in therapeutic philosophy were superficial, and that the nutritionist’s discourse incorporated both dynamic and interpersonal factors, while mine also emphasized motivational and spiritual factors. The gender dynamics of male therapist/female nutritionist may also have been beneficial. Michele actually commented that although the messages were essentially the same, they were being expressed alternatively in a “male” and “female” voice. There is little question that the regular and focused communications between the two professionals ensured that we remained on the same page and greatly enhanced the patient’s perception of consistency.


186


BACK TO REALITY: FAMILY AND FRIENDS Family Issues The transition back to normal social and relational networks is routinely difficult, particularly for adolescents returning to family, school, and friends. Sessions with the whole family early on may be especially productive. Research with severe mental disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, has established that a high degree of stressful communication within the family after discharge is an ominous predictor of relapse (Milkowitz, 2004). Although the related research for AN is limited, the impact appears to be similar (Eisler, Simic, Russell & Dare, 2007; Kyriacou, Treasure & Schmidt, 2008). In fact, because weight maintenance and normal eating remain central issues for the patient, families are especially prone to respond to their high levels of anxiety by closely monitoring their child’s behavior. These issues should be discussed with the parents, prior to discharge. Parents often have many questions, and their uncertainties have been fueled to some extent by the historic divisions in the field about the issue of parental involvement (see Chapters 19 to 21 on family issues). The answers are never simple, because they depend, to a considerable degree, on the state and personality of the patient, as well as on his or her relationship with their parents. Some patients readily welcome involvement of their parents to provide some of the structure they had in the residential program. Others, as often described in the classical literature on this illness, want their parents to stay out of issues with their eating and weight, and feel that they can manage them with the help of their new treatment team. This is an issue that needs to be assessed individually. The usefulness of family therapy for adolescents has been well established, beginning with the pioneering studies at the Maudsley Hospital in London in the 1980s (Russell, Szmuckler, Dare & Eisler, 1987). What is now known as the “Maudsley Method” has generated intense interest in the United States (Lock, Le Grange, Agras & Dare, 2001) and is considered by many to be the standard of care for adolescents with AN (Varchol & Cooper, 2009; see also Brisman, Chapter 20). Maudsley researchers have also found that, in some instances, especially when the parents are excessively critical or hostile to their child, separate sessions with the parents and the patient can be equally effective (Eisler et al., 2000). Also, the original Maudsley study cited above found that the method’s effectiveness was limited to adolescents. In fact, family therapy had a minimal or worsening impact on young adult patients (i.e., over 18 years old) with regard to weight gain and a global measure of outcome. There was a trend for individual therapy to be more effective in the over-18 age group. No subsequent study has contradicted this important limitation. Although family dynamics are still an important area for the therapist to consider in young adults, if the primary mode of treatment is going to be individual therapy, the exploration of these dynamics with the family should not preempt the goal of establishing a trusting and empathic therapeutic relationship. Often, one or both parents have their own issues that they would like to address therapeutically. In most cases, because of boundary issues, this should be carried out with another therapist. The following vignette addresses the some of the complexities of these boundary dilemmas.


BACK TO REALITY: FAMILY AND FRIENDS

187

Megan, a 19-year-old college sophomore who had been hospitalized for AN, had not only reached normal weight but had begun to make substantial progress in other areas as well. Despite the fact that her parents lived some sixty miles from my office, they seemed eager to meet with me, despite their awareness of Megan’s need for confidentiality. Megan, however, was adamantly opposed to my meeting with her parents and she was especially averse to the idea of joint sessions. Finally, after insistent demands from her mother, she relented, under the condition that we not meet together. I met with both parents without Megan, and they indeed had many anxieties about her ability to maintain her weight and avoid relapse. They expressed concerns about other issues, including Megan’s continuing social isolation. Finally, and unbeknownst to the father, the mother hesitantly and poignantly revealed that Megan had been date raped in her junior year in high school. I had been totally unaware of this part of Megan’s history, and apparently it had never surfaced during her hospitalization. I now had a problem, however. I had learned something critical that Megan had not revealed to me. In effect, a secret triangle had been set up between me, Megan, and her parents, and this was likely to cause problems later on. Fortunately, Megan herself disclosed her troubled history about two months later, and we were able to work on its consequences. I never had to disclose that her mother had told me this part of her history, but I felt uneasy about knowing it, and relieved when Megan told the story herself. Of course, there were other ways to proceed than the path that I chose. It would be conceivable to gently disclose the information provided by Megan’s parents to Megan in order to facilitate her addressing the issue herself. However, one likely outcome of that communication would be to reinforce Megan’s sense of not being in control of her own life and privacy. In my view, it was better to wait for her to disclose the incident when she was ready. The risk, of course, is that the disclosure may have never happened.

Secrets in therapy can have complex ethical and therapeutic ramifications challenging the therapist to titrate the obviously important emphasis on honesty with the practical ramifications of therapist disclosure of possibly disturbing communications with others (ImberBlack, 1993). In her case, I believed that allowing Megan to discuss the sexual abuse in her own time was in her best interest. If the patient is of college-age and living away from home, the situation is somewhat different. Most parents will still be very interested in the kind of care that their child is getting, especially if they are financially responsible. Parents vary greatly in the degree to which they respect the necessary boundaries of privacy in the therapeutic situation, but the therapist must be clear about confidentiality and the need for a secure, trusting therapy relationship. The majority of parents will respect the need for confidentiality. While alleviating blame and guilt is important, this can be challenging, as most discussions take place by telephone early on in treatment, often prior to the time that the therapist has a full sense of the family dynamics. Developmentally, college age patients living away from home may not need as much family therapy as younger patients, for whom it should be a priority. However, when the patient’s permission and willingness to meet with his or her parents has been established as a precondition, it can be helpful to have occasional family sessions. This becomes a more pressing need if there is a crisis or growing threat of relapse, as seen in the following clinical vignette.


188


Janna was the oldest of three sisters in a family from Texas, attending a Northeastern college. She became severely anorexic during her fourth semester, forcing withdrawal from school. After intensive treatment for 2 months in a residential facility, she entered an aftercare program, returned to school the next year, and lived off-campus with several roommates. While able to maintain her weight and address many important issues in treatment, her relationships with her roommates were often turbulent. One of her roommates was actively struggling with serious depression; another roommate was a close friend with whom Janna’s mother had made a sub rosa agreement to notify her if she saw any deterioration in Janna’s behavior. Janna’s tense interactions with her various housemates were partially due to her new-found assertiveness (sometimes what appears to be a conflict or “troublesomeness” emanates from a patient’s overcoming her excessive need to placate). Her parents came to school to deal with what appeared to be a crisis and we held a joint session. I had had little previous contact with the parents. Two issues emerged. The first was that Janna’s friend may have been overreacting to the potential of Janna’s “relapse” out of her own sense of personal distress in their relationship. But second, the parents very much wanted Janna to end this living situation and change her residence. Janna intensely resisted. My response was to ally with Janna, emphasizing her need to make independent and mature decisions about what she could handle. The outcome was positive despite initial tension; Janna felt validated by my support while her parents also felt more secure about Janna’s treatment and reaffirmed in their role as parents.

Friends’ Roles in Recovery The preceding vignette also illustrates an issue that has been little discussed in the clinical literature. Peers who have seen a friend unravel into severe anorexia and then reappear in improved physical condition often have profound reactions. Although reassured by the physical changes, peers often remain considerably anxious about the recovering person’s vulnerability. This can be productive, if the interest is primarily a constructive one. Friends can provide emotional support and opportunities for sharing of feelings, especially troubling ones. Social isolation is a typical precursor of anorexic episodes, and its continuation after treatment is obviously unfavorable for the patient’s recovery. However, patients can experience their friend’s concerns as intrusive and sense that they are under intense scrutiny. This perception can lead to self-consciousness, constrained interactions, and resentful or angry feelings.

BODY IMAGE, WEIGHT CONCERNS, AND EXERCISE Although many patients show substantial improvement in BI after residential treatment (Probst, Vandereycken, Van Copponolle & Pieters, 1999), most have persistent BI concerns that include feelings of fatness and hypervigilance about not exceeding their discharge weight (see Johnston, Chapter 26). Some studies show such feelings to be highly predictive of relapse (Keel et al., 2005). Patients in partial recovery often fantasize about re-establishing their “skinny” selves, fantasies which are sometimes accompanied by brief periods of restriction. As these are normal thoughts during the recovery process, patients need a forum in


BODY IMAGE, WEIGHT CONCERNS, AND EXERCISE

189

which to discuss them. The therapist’s attitude of acceptance towards these toxic thoughts provides a model for patients to adopt the same stance and teaches that, however much they provoke anxiety about regressing, thoughts are transient and will pass. Open discussion about negative BI allows patients to begin to see these thoughts as a part of their illness, not a part of their own character, and inimical to their well-being. The patient’s improved physical and emotional states also provide an opportunity to examine the functions and meaning of both BI concerns and impulses to restrict. With respect to the latter, it is common for patients to have a strong impulse to restrict when they become anxious about social and interpersonal concerns. Though not always possible, the therapist should make every effort to help the patient become aware of these connections, because they often represent a critical part of the dynamic that originally fueled the development of AN. Patients’ ongoing journals about their thoughts and feelings can be especially helpful at these junctures. Exercise and physical activity can play a positive role in recovery and must be addressed in outpatient treatment (Ressler et al., Chapter 24; Calogero, and Pedrotty-Stump, Chapter 25). Practices such as Yoga, Tai-Chi Chuan, or other forms of body practices that emphasize “centering” (Calogero & Pedrotty, 2004) can be especially helpful. They promote a sense of the body as experienced from within and encourage a kind of meditative attitude towards cognitive and emotional activity. The timing and structure of exercise activities is as important as the type of movement. Recommending these activities to patients in the early stages of outpatient treatment without providing careful guidelines can be counterproductive (Calogero & Pedrotty, 2004, 2007). Nonetheless, contrary to longstanding admonitions against exercise during the weight restoration process, new evidence suggests that supervised, mindful activities can actually facilitate weight restoration and maintenance (see Calogero, and Pedrotty-Stump, Chapter 25, for a thorough discussion of this topic). Keep in mind that Strober et al.’s (1997) long-term follow-up study found that compulsive exercise is one of the most powerful predictors of relapse. Many patients know intuitively that it would be very difficult for them to return to running on a treadmill without lapsing into excess, and therapists should support their honest self-appraisals in this regard. However, it is also important for patients to gradually re-establish healthy activity levels, often by finding other avenues for movement. So while “working out” should be carefully re-introduced under supervision, regular walking, initially for prescribed periods of time, may be encouraged, with discussion about its health benefits. Even better, an emphasis on exercise that is integrated with outdoor activity in a natural context, such as gardening or hiking, is recommended. If the patient is so inclined, participation in group athletic activities that emphasize the value of exercise in a social context, can also be encouraged, again being mindful of the potential risks.

Abby’s experience of her BI fluctuated considerably after residential treatment. Some days she felt that she looked fine, but on others she was tormented by the feeling of being fat. Her journals showed a correlation between these feelings and her mood. She had a conflictual relationship with a boyfriend, and following intense arguments she experienced intense fantasies of reverting to “eating nothing” and re-establishing waif-like status. She had made enough progress to recognize


190


these impulses as her “old friend anorexia,” which she increasingly recognized as an enemy of her well-being. When she felt this way, she often increased her body checking, and would spend a certain amount of time before a mirror each morning to ensure that her abdomen remained flat. Because she spontaneously personified the anorexia in this way, I had her conduct some Gestalttype dialogs, with her “anorexia” as the figure in the empty chair. While she found this difficult and awkward at first, as most people do, she became very engaged in these dialogs and realized the extent to which her anorexia was connected with very angry feelings and urges to “say no.” It took some months of treatment to get to a point where Abby was comfortable in acknowledging the connection between her anger and her ED rituals. She had also been a compulsive exerciser prior to her hospitalization and knew instinctively that it would be difficult for her to set limits for herself if she started going to the gym again. Drawn to gardening, she found that working outdoors during the summer was almost sufficient to satisfy her need for activity. During the winter, however, such activity was obviously impossible. In order to deal with her BI dissatisfaction, she joined a campus support group on BI issues, which she found helpful and to which she made many contributions. The following summer she worked for a professional gardening service. Not only did this channel her need for activity productively, but her comradeship with the regular working staff, who accepted her as an equal, was a great boost to her confidence.

INTERPERSONAL AND DYNAMIC ISSUES Despite the need to maintain some focus on weight, food, and BI issues, the interpersonal and emotional dilemmas are core issues for long-term recovery. As noted earlier, weight restoration and improved nutritional intake allow for a shift in therapeutic priorities, with the interpersonal and emotional issues moving to the fore.

Kyra developed AN in the summer following her graduation from high school and continued to slowly lose weight over the following 2 years. After two unsuccessful attempts at outpatient treatment, both of which emphasized direct behavioral intervention, she was admitted to an inpatient program for 10 weeks, where her weight was fairly well normalized. Kyra was 10 years younger than her sister, Zoe, who had had a tumultuous adolescence, but who had achieved some success in the computer software field. Zoe was estranged from her parents, and had sworn that she would never marry or have children. The parents focused their hopes on Kyra as the child who could absolve them for being the bad or controlling parents, accusations previously made by Zoe. Kyra’s anorexia had badly shaken them. She attended a local college, near home, and was an excellent science student aiming for a career in chemistry. Kyra felt that her hospitalization, while a shocking interruption to her life, had provided her with a much better ability to tolerate a higher body weight, although “being around food” was still anxiety provoking. After 3 months of treatment, Kyra revealed that she had been pressured into having sex a number of times by a male acquaintance who had served informally as her trainer at a local gym. She very much admired the man’s physical prowess and his skill as a trainer, and was afraid that she would alienate him if she refused his advances. Nevertheless, she had found the experiences painful and demeaning and bitterly regretted that she had gone along.


INTEGRATED APPROACHES

191

In addition to this secret trauma, Kyra revealed that she had felt intense anxieties around people, especially men, as far back as she could remember. These and other critical issues, including concerns about male approval, her low self-esteem, her driven and perfectionistic nature, and the way in which Kyra’s conflicts were pre-figured in the lives of her parents, became the focus of treatment for well over a year. Only then was Kyra able to feel more genuinely comfortable with herself. Throughout this deepening work, Kyra continued to work with her nutritionist to help her increase her comfort level with a higher caloric intake. This nutritional stability set the foundation for the shift in therapeutic focus to the more complex interpersonal and emotional challenges.

It is difficult to prescribe specific procedures to deal with these complicated interpersonal and psychodynamic issues; the choice of interventions made by the therapist and the patient reflect the art of longer-term psychotherapy. Comprehensive, ongoing training in psychodynamic and interpersonal therapies is essential. Kathryn Zerbe’s (2008) book is a particularly good resource providing a detailed discussion of longer-term psychodynamically oriented therapy with ED patients. Unlike many traditional psychodynamic approaches, Zerbe makes an effort to integrate many of the tools of a CBT approach, and incorporates cultural considerations into treatment. Zerbe’s analysis of what is needed for treatment at different stages of the life cycle is valuable and instructive. Fairburn (2008) has expanded his earlier model of CBT to address some of the mechanisms that perpetuate an overvaluation of shape and weight. The new model, CBT-E, is designed for patients across the ED diagnostic spectrum. It extends the focus on normalization of eating, weight, and shape concerns to interpersonal and emotional factors that may be sustaining the ED. The CBT-E model includes interventions for perfectionism, core low self-esteem, and interpersonal problems. A study of CBT-E for patients with AN is in progress, but has not been published at the time of writing of this chapter (Fairburn, personal communication, 2009). Given the proven effectiveness of interpersonal therapy (IPT) for bulimia nervosa (BN) (Agras, Walsh, Fairburn, Wilson & Kraemer, 2000), and the prominence of interpersonal issues in AN, one would expect that IPT would be useful in AN. There has been little systematic work on this hypothesis to date, and the one controlled study concluded that both manualized IPT and CBT were considerably less effective in treating non-weight-restored AN outpatients than a flexible clinical management approach (McIntosh et al., 2005). I would speculate that, in their manualized forms, neither treatment addresses a broad enough spectrum of issues to be successful. For example, manualized IPT excludes a focus on behavioral issues relevant to the ED, and CBT does not sufficiently incorporate interpersonal factors. One published study did find that a broadened form of CBT, one that incorporated interpersonal factors, was superior to nutritional therapy alone for weight-restored patients (Pike, Walsh, Vitousek, Wilson & Bauer, 2003).

INTEGRATED APPROACHES Clinicians working with ED patients need to draw from a variety of different treatment options. Cognitive Analytic Psychotherapy (CAT) (Ryle, 1990; Ryle & Kerr, 2002) effectively integrates empirically validated aspects of psychodynamic, interpersonal, and cognitive


192


therapies into one package. In preliminary work on the application of CAT to the treatment of AN, Treasure and Ward (1997) reported its use with a severe case, and a London-based team reported on a controlled trial of CAT comparing it with family therapy, a year of focal psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and a control group of low contact, routine treatment for one year (Dare, Eisler, Russell, Treasure & Dodge, 2001). The results were only modestly successful as measured by weight gain and other improvements, but most patients in the study were below target weight. As emphasized above, under these conditions, weight issues tend to dominate, or strongly influence, the therapy. Ryle and Kerr (2002) commented that: Eating disorders represent the expression of inter- and intrapersonal problems through an abnormal preoccupation with weight and food. They are always associated with, but may serve to obscure, problems at the level of self processes, predominantly expressed around issues of control, submission, placation and perfectionism (p. 152).

Cognitive analytic therapy is designed to be a short-term therapy (16 sessions) for use with a wide spectrum of patients. The therapy focuses on the patient’s current interpersonal dilemmas and impasses, based on the understanding that these issues originated in early interactions with family members or crucial others. In the early stages, it provides assessment tools to define the patient’s essential personal issues and interpersonal impasses. The therapist’s task is to formulate the crux of the patient’s interpersonal dilemmas in the form of a written statement, typically in the form of a letter to the patient. The formulation is open to revision on the basis of the patient’s response to it and the therapist’s increasing appreciation of the patient’s difficulties. This early written formulation provides a great deal of focus for the psychosocial component of therapy, and helps to keep patients motivated and connected through what is often experienced in other forms of psychodynamic treatment as a vague and open-ended process. The therapist is also encouraged to construct diagrams depicting the patient’s interpersonal dilemmas. An essential component of CAT is the notion that patients are typically trapped in vicious cycles of behavior and interactions. These recurring patterns are protective but they also serve to reinforce or worsen their anxieties; CAT focuses on changing these rigid and maladaptive attitudes towards interpersonal situations. In AN, a common pattern is to ward off feelings of anger by demanding independence or placating others, while simultaneously acting in ways that provoke others to attempt to control them further. The therapy is basically psychodynamic in that it traces the patient’s self-defeating patterns to childhood experiences. But it is a far more efficient technique in that the therapist is able to arrive at a tentative formulation of the relationships between current behaviors and childhood relationships in three or four sessions. Cognitive analytic therapy emphasizes the ways in which the patient contributes to sustaining problematic interactions (“reciprocal role relationships”). The approach also utilizes the interaction between patient and therapist as a model “in the room” for the patient’s relationships in the real world, past and present. Its incorporation of an active focus on the transferential aspects of the patientetherapist relationship makes it unique among the cognitive therapies. This integrated therapeutic model seems to have substantial potential as a technique in the treatment of weight-restored AN patients. It has demonstrated efficacy with patients with


ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING COMORBIDITIES

193

borderline personality disorder (Ryle & Kerr, 2002), but it still lacks strong empirical support for the treatment of ED. The CAT model reflects the central thesis of this chapter, namely, that a comprehensive treatment of ED requires both the management of weight and weight restoration, and a systematic approach to the associated cognitive, interpersonal, and affective features of the illness. It is this integration that makes treatment so challenging, and further research such a high priority.

ASSESSING AND ADDRESSING COMORBIDITIES Comorbidities such as depression and anxiety often only emerge in full force once ED behaviors are interrupted and the physically toxic state of starvation is remedied. Depression and anxiety, for example, tend to be well masked or submerged in the acute anorexic state (see Levine and Levine, Chapter 7 for a review of these issues). Weight-restored patients will often be aware of a heightened sense of anxiety and moodiness, as is evident in the stories of Kyra and Michele above. At times, it is hard to distinguish between a primary mood or anxiety disorder and secondary reactions to malnutrition and disordered eating. When these symptoms are identified, medications can play a significant role, as illustrated in the following vignette.

Julie developed AN in the 11th grade during which her weight dropped from 125 to 98 pounds. She was hospitalized for a month and a half over the summer of her junior year and was discharged close to her target weight. She entered outpatient therapy immediately after her hospitalization and quickly became engaged in the treatment process. An excellent student with a high degree of perfectionism, she applied herself to her therapeutic work, writing extensive journals with enthusiasm. Her weight, however, gradually began to drop, and both the nutritionist and the therapist were concerned. During the course of one session, it suddenly became clear that Julie had had a severe episode of childhood OCD when she was around 8 years old, one that she had never disclosed to anyone, including her treatment team in the hospital. As one of her rituals, she had spent hours praying in the evening that nothing untoward happen to her parents (there was no external threat). After conferring about this and Julie’s ongoing anxiety levels, the psychiatrist decided to treat her with an SSRIs, increased to a fairly high level after an initial positive response. Julie felt that the medication helped her immensely. Not only was she less anxious in general, but she was able to approach food more comfortably and re-establish her normal weight.

On the issue of mood symptoms, patients need to utilize psychotherapy to develop a clearer sense of who they are and whether some degree of social anxiety or mood fluctuation is just a part of their temperamentdone they can learn to live with. Many patients who manage to embrace this position are initially ambivalent about medication. Ultimately, they usually come to accept and adapt to their own personality characteristics.


194


Aside from understanding anxiety and depression as medical comorbidities, we should attempt to comprehend both their dynamic significance and consequences. For example, many AN patients will experience depressive reactions to having “lost” the thrill of control they had achieved in the active phases of AN. To the extent that starvation quelled the anxieties that preceded the ED, they have a new opportunity to confront these anxieties directly, to learn what they are about, and to cope with them more effectively. In struggling with these issues, patients may have fantasies of fleeing back into comfort and protection that the starvation phase of their illness afforded them. As one said to me, “when I think about these things [feelings of inadequacy provoked by interpersonal conflicts], I just want to starve, starve, starve.” The mere articulation of such fantasies in psychotherapy helps to establish control over the underlying impulses.

SUMMARY The treatment of patients with AN after their weight has been restored offers the opportunity to address the fundamental issues that gave rise to the disease. These concerns tend to be obscured by malnutrition, and are of lower priority during inpatient or residential treatment. Despite the emphasis on the opportunities for thoroughly addressing psychosocial factors after weight restoration, weight and eating behaviors remain dangerous vulnerabilities for the AN patient. Body-image concerns linger; exploring their origins and meanings, both developmentally and interpersonally, can be a bridge that shifts the psychotherapy focus from body and eating to relational and developmental issues. Ultimately, treatment for weight-restored AN patients needs to focus on the interpersonal and characterological factors that were involved in the development of the disorder. If unmodified, these factors will continue to support the maintenance of the illness (Federici & Kaplan, 2008). Although there are many interpersonal and cognitive therapies, I have argued that the CAT approach developed by Ryle (1990) has great promise. Based on his years of experience at the Royal Free Hospital in London, Russell commented that the science and art of weight restoration in AN had been well developed, as early as 1977 (Russell, 1977). The critical question about resolving the illness, he thought, was how to help the patient after discharge. Russell felt that we knew little about what factors predict a poor outcome, and probably even less about whether outpatient treatment contributes to resolving the illness. In the intervening years, we have learned much about the course of AN and the factors that predict relapse. We know much less about the comparative effectiveness of different treatment methods. This chapter attempts to incorporate many of the research findings about the predictors of relapse into treatment, including findings about the persistence of food restriction (Sysko et al., 2005), the predictive value of weight loss in the weeks after discharge (Kaplan et al., 2009), and the persistence of BI concerns in weight-restored patients (Keel et al., 2005). We know very little from research about the treatment of psychosocial and emotional factors, but clinical experience, as well as our patients’ reports, continue to show their importance for long-term sustained recovery (Federici & Kaplan, 2008; Jarman & Walsh, 1999; Keski-Rahkonen & Tozzi, 2005; Lamoureux & Bottorff, 2005; Nordbo et al., 2008;


SUMMARY

195

Surgenor, Plumridge & Horn, 2003; Tozzi, Sullivan, Fear, McKenzie & Bulik, 2003; Weaver, Wuest & Ciliska, 2005; see also McGilley and Szablewski, Chapter 12). I have suggested the relevance of some time-limited treatment models for resolving the interpersonal and developmental issues of weight-restored anorexics. Still, much work needs to be done to put these methods on sound empirical footing. Treatment research in AN remains one of the most pressing needs of the entire field of ED (Agras et al., 2004). A few controlled trials have been conducted, with mixed results, and it is critical to undertake future research on groups of different weight status and age, for reasons enumerated in this chapter. Meanwhile, the outpatient clinician must continue to work with patients, integrating the art of psychotherapy with the emerging research. This chapter outlines some of the ingredients that make such treatment successful.

References Agras, W., Brandt, H., Bulik, C., Dotlan-Sewell, D., Fairburn, C., Halmi, K. A., . Wilfley, D. E. (2004). Report of the National Institutes of Health Workshop on overcoming barriers to treatment research in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 509e521. Agras, W. S., Walsh, B. T., Fairburn, C. G., Wilson, G. T., & Kraemer, H. C. (2000). A multicenter comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 459e466. Calogero, R. M., & Pedrotty, K. N. (2004). The practice and process of healthy exercise: An investigation of the treatment of exercise abuse in women with eating disorders. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 12, 273e291. Calogero, R. M., & Pedrotty, K. N. (2007). Daily practices for mindful exercise. In L. L’Abate, D. Embry, & M. Baggett (Eds.), Handbook of low-cost preventive interventions for physical and mental health: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 141e160). Amsterdam, ND: Springer-Verlag. Carter, J. C., Blackmore, E., Sutandar-Pinnock, K., & Woodside, D. B. (2004). Relapse in anorexia nervosa: A survival analysis. Psychological Medicine, 34, 671e679. Cockell, S. J., Zaitsoff, S. L., & Geller, J. (2004). Maintaining change following eating disorder treatment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 527e534. Dare, C., Eisler, I., Russell, G., Treasure, J., & Dodge, L. (2001). Psychological therapies for adults with anorexia nervosa: Randomized controlled trial of outpatient treatments. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 216e221. Eisler, I., Dare, C., Hodes, M., Russell, G., Dodge, E., & Le Grange, D. (2000). Family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa: The results of a controlled comparison of two family interventions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(6), 727e736. Eisler, I., Simic, M., Russell, G. F., & Dare, C. (2007). A randomized controlled treatment trial of two forms of family therapy in adolescent anorexia nervosa: A five-year follow-up. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 552e560. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Federici, A., & Kaplan, A. S. (2008). The patient’s account of relapse and recovery in anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study. European Eating Disorders Review, 16, 1e10. Imber-Black, E. (1993). Secrets in families and family therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. Jarman, M., & Walsh, S. (1999). Evaluating recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Integrating lessons learned from research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 773e788. Kaplan, A. S., Walsh, B. T., Olmsted, M., Attia, E., Carter, J. C., Devlin, M. J., . Parides, M. (2009). The slippery slope: Prediction of successful weight maintenance in anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1037e1045. Keel, P. K., Dorer, D. J., Franko, D. L., Jackson, S. C., & Herzog, D. B. (2005). Postremission predictors of relapse in women with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 2263e2268. Keski-Rahkonen, A., & Tozzi, F. (2005). The process of recovery in eating disorder sufferers’ own words: An internet-based study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, S80eS86.


196


Kyriacou, O., Treasure, J., & Schmidt, U. (2008). Expressed emotion in eating disorders assessed via self-report: An examination of factors associated with expressed emotion in carers of people with anorexia nervosa in comparison to control families. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 37e46. Lamoureux, M., & Bottorff, J. (2005). “Becoming the real me”: Recovering from anorexia nervosa. Health Care for Women International, 26, 170e188. Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Agras, W. S., & Dare, C. (2001). Treatment manual for anorexia nervosa: A family-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Lowe, B., Zipfel, S., Bucholz, C., Dupont, Y., Reas, D. L., & Herzog, W. (2001). Long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa in a prospective, 21-year follow-up study. Psychological Medicine, 31, 881e890. McIntosh, V. W., Jordan, J., Carter, F. A., Luty, S. E., McKenzie, J. M., Bulik, C. M., . Joyce, P. R. (2005). Three psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa: A randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 741e747. Milkowitz, D. J. (2004). The role of family systems in severe and recurrent psychiatric disorders: A developmental psychopathology view. Developmental Psychopathology, 16, 667e688. Nordbo, R., Gulliksen, K., Espeset, E., Skarderud, F., Geller, J., & Holte, A. (2008). Expanding the concept of motivation to change: The content of patients’ wish to recover from anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 635e642. Pike, K. M., Walsh, B. T., Vitousek, K., Wilson, G. T., & Bauer, J. (2003). Cognitive-behavior therapy in the posthospitalization treatment of anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 2046e2049. Probst, M., Vandereycken, W., Van Copponolle, W., & Pieters, G. (1999). Body experience and eating disorders before and after treatment: A follow-up study. European Psychiatry, 14, 333e340. Russell, G. F. M. (1977). General management of anorexia nervosa and difficulties in assessing the efficacy of treatment. In R. A. Vigersky (Ed.), Anorexia nervosa (pp. 277e290). New York, NY: Raven Press. Russell, G. F. M., Szmuckler, G. L., Dare, C., & Eisler, M. A. (1987). An evaluation of family therapy in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 1047e1056. Ryle, A., & Kerr, I. B. (2002). Introducing cognitive analytic therapy: Principles and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Ryle, A. (1990). Cognitive analytic therapy: Active participation in change. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Strober, M., Freeman, R., & Morrell, W. (1997). The long term course of severe anorexia nervosa in adolescence: Survival analysis of recovery, relapse, and outcome predictors over 10e15 years in a prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 339e360. Surgenor, L., Plumridge, E., & Horn, J. (2003). “Knowing one’s self” anorexic: Implications for therapeutic practice. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 22e32. Sysko, R., Walsh, B. T., Schebendach, J., & Wilson, G. T. (2005). Eating behavior among women with anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82, 296e301. Tozzi, F., Sullivan, P., Fear, J., McKenzie, J., & Bulik, C. (2003). Causes and recovery in anorexia nervosa: The patient’s perspective. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 143e154. Treasure, J., & Ward, A. (1997). Cognitive analytical therapy in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 4, 62e71. Varchol, L., & Cooper, H. (2009). Psychotherapy approaches for adolescents with eating disorders. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 21, 457e464. Weaver, K., Wuest, J., & Ciliska, D. (2005). Understanding women’s journey of recovering from anorexia nervosa. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 188e206. Zerbe, K. (2008). Integrated treatment of eating disorders: Beyond the body betrayed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.


C H A P T E R

12 Recipe for Recovery Necessary Ingredients for the Client’s and Clinician’s Success Beth Hartman McGilley and Jacqueline K. Szablewski This chapter elucidates ingredients of two inextricably linked topics not well described in the clinical literature. First, despite a wide body of research now supporting the assertion that the quality of the therapeutic alliance is the best predictor of psychotherapy outcome (American Psychiatric Association, 2006), little rigorous attention has been paid to the qualities of the eating disorder (ED) therapist most conducive to a positive healing relationship. Second, even with close to 50 years of research, a comprehensive, comparable, consistent, and clinically meaningful definition of recovery has yet to be articulated and accepted in and across the ED treatment field. To assist in bridging these gaps, we begin with a discussion of those therapist qualities associated with effective therapeutic alliance, followed by an exploration of what constitutes recovery. We hope to describe the mysterious mixture of textures, flavors, and hallmarks that indicate that the healing has indeed been done.

THE EFFECTIVE CLINICIAN’S CUPBOARD The Importance of Alliance Both clinical experience and scientific rigor have borne out that the quality of the therapeutic relationship is essential for successful ED treatment (American Psychiatric Association, 2006; Beresin, Gordon & Herzog, 1989; Bunnell, 2009; Burket & Schramm, 1995; Costin, 2007a). In fact, it is regarded as a better indicator of positive outcome across ED diagnoses than any specific treatment technique (Costin, 2007a). The American Psychiatric Association (2006) names the importance of a therapeutic relationship as the first principle in their psychiatric management treatment guidelines. Eating disorder practitioners attest that solid therapeutic rapport results in less attrition, fewer premature treatment terminations, and more helpful therapy. It is through the relationship that we challenge the client’s reliance


197


198

12. RECIPE FOR RECOVERY

on their ED symptoms and engage them in developing alternative, adaptive skills in order to make effective changes in their physical, psychological, and psychosocial functioning. Advances in neuropsychiatry and neuroscience have substantiated the relational claim, long suspected as true by practicing clinicians, and experienced as true by ED clients themselves (Beresin et al., 1989; Pettersen & Rosenvinge, 2002). For example, the discovery of mirror neurons has generated significant interest in the healing professions (Cozolino, 2002). Located in the premotor areas of the brain’s frontal cortex, mirror neurons “fire in response to an observation of a highly specific relationship between an actor and some object, and also fire when the action is performed (mirrored) by the observer” (Cozolino, 2002, p. 184). The involved motor systems “in turn activate networks of emotions associated with such actions” (p. 186). In a number of ways “mirror neurons may bridge the gap between sender and receiver, helping us understand one another and enhance the possibility of empathic attunement” (p. 186). Thus, echoing early infant attachment studies, contemporary feminist thought, and the field of quantum physics, interpersonal impact is inevitable; so too, within the therapeutic relationship. Previous chapters have addressed and explored approaches and modalities for treating ED. Effective ED clinicians must be adept in their approach and steeped in a variety of psychotherapeutic techniques. A basic body of knowledge, supervised specialty training in ED treatment interventions and techniques, clinical experience, and constant review constitute the staples of training programs for ED specialists (Andersen & Corson, 2001; Yager & Edelstein, 1987). Too often overlooked and harder to scientifically quantify are the qualities in the seasoned clinician that enliven the techniques and infuse the relationship so central to healing. Just as warmth and caring without technical skills do not suffice for sustained healing and recovery, neither do technical skills without an authentic therapeutic relationship.

Alliance Ingredients Non-possessive warmth and unconditional positive regard. “Non-possessive warmth” (Andersen & Corson, 2001, p. 356), stands akin to the “unconditional positive regard” espoused by Carl Rogers (1961, p. 47). Informed by the tenets of feminist relational theory, it provides the base for the therapeutic connection. Elements included are: • • • • • • • •

Basic respect for the person who sits before us A desire to know who that person is no matter how textbook they may seem Care for whom we will discover them to be in the context of their lives Compassionate curiosity about how and what they make meaning of in life Communication that is honest and direct and not placating or patronizing Respectful kindness honoring boundaries on both sides Willingness to be wrong, own mistakes, and repair therapeutic impasses Room for conflict and confrontation to inform and deepen the connection.

These relational conditions create breathing space for clients amidst their skepticism, selfdoubt, and panic (aka resistance). They help the client to dare to stay, trust, and risk often when not wanting to and sometimes without knowing why. To the clinician, these relational conditions offer an opportunity to meet the client. Impassioned by each of these, we have


THE EFFECTIVE CLINICIAN’S CUPBOARD

199

a presence to offer and we begin our invitation for our clients to engage. If it is accepted, the work of recovery can proceed. Active and worthwhile engagement. Since most clients exist within the perceived safety of the ED “atmosphere,” the invitation we extend needs to be engaging enough to reach through the atmospheric resistance. Davis (2009a) speaks poignantly about “the need [at the beginning of treatment] to grab the patient’s attention to wrench her away from her relationship with the ED symptoms and toward the other person [the therapist] in the room” (p. 40). He emphasizes nontraditional manners of behaving (less formal and aloof, more personal and collaborative), while being mindful of appropriate boundaries, in order, “to get the [person] thinking and wondering about you so that she starts to experience the therapist’s presence” (p. 40). In my practice, this “active and worthwhile engagement” (Davis, 2009b, p. 6) takes many forms: a comment about another NFL team if the client shows up with a Pittsburgh Steelers cap on; a compliment about the scarf or pendant a client wears to session; or an exchange about what the client’s “patronas charm or dementors” would be if the client shows up reading Harry Potter 3 (Rowling, 1999). Such interchanges, marked by spontaneity, curiosity, and considered bits of self-disclosure, create opportunities. For a moment, the attention of the client is disarmed and moves away from the ED toward the therapist (Davis, 2009a, b). A new form of “molecular bonding,” a client-allowed-crack in the resistance occurs. Somehow, through the fissures in the resistance, impact can be felt and true contact has been made. Embodied authenticity and being real. As stated by Zerbe, perhaps “first and foremost [our] ability to be real and human [helps our client] to feel that she, too, [has] a chance to be real and human herself ” (1995, p. 162). Beresin et al. (1989) describe the task of becoming real as central to ED recovery and an area in which mentoring is necessary. How we deal with a faux pas, unintended empathic lapse, or a less than graceful moment goes a long way in modeling the survivability of human imperfection, and the resiliency of relationship in the face of conflict, disappointment, frustration, and anger. These are feelings the client may have sought to avoid through the “protection” of their ED symptoms. These real, authentic experiences in relationship, of relationship, provide exposure to a different perspective of humanness. For example, upon successful completion of a 7-year treatment course for chronic bulimia nervosa (BN), incest and abuse, a former client thanked me for my “true humanness” in our relationship. She named it as central to her “becoming a real human being again.” Remarkably, this was a client whose initial grappling with the questions and meanings of humanness and perfection yielded her the insight that in her internal logic, “humanness” had defined her perpetrator, while “perfection” had attempted to separate her from abuse and the abuser. She would interpret a cookie with her lunch, an unsatisfying interaction with a co-worker, or an extra pound on the scale when she weighed herself for the fourteenth time that day, as “really messing up.” In the face of such “intolerable humanness” and perceived failing by self or other, she would turn to punishing and severely denigrating behaviors. A core component of her healing involved her challenging this template in the ways she related to her body and self, as well as in thought, spirit, and action. Eventually she was able to reclaim a broader definition of humanness characterized by the alternative relational experiences she had in therapy, and slowly but surely, in the other places of her life. Loosening her grip on both


200


the concept and practice of perfectionism made room for a healthy acceptance of the imperfections that make her authentically human and real. In a similar vein, how we honor our own boundaries and expect others to do the same, like taking a vacation, or regularly breaking for lunch, demonstrates the permissibility of basic human needs and desires, and the process of navigating between “not abandoning self for other” and “abandoning self for fear the other will feel abandoned.” How and whether we deal with or ignore a burp, hiccup, coughing fit, or tummy growl can illustrate the naturalness of body function and the vital legitimacy of having a physical self that requires both acknowledgment and care. Especially in ED treatment, the therapist’s embodiment is a powerful example and teacher. “Carefully tended and appropriately nourished, the therapist’s embodied experience can be . a useful tool in the efforts to help clients navigate recovery” (Costin, 2009, p. 191), teaching them to tend carefully, nourish well, and even enjoy their own embodiment. Empathy and trust. For client and clinician alike, it can be tempting to avoid, dismiss, or numbly barrel through those life situations and challenges that threaten to expose our vulnerabilities and flaws. When finally we risk facing the challenge or developmental life task, we are also taking the tender and calculated risk of being seen, tolerated, even loved “as our worst selves” (Derenne, 2006, p. 339), in our worst light. Clinicians who have been clients, whether for ED recovery or other forms of personal growth, know both sides of this abyss. Taking that leap, believing our extension of trust will not be betrayed or belittled, is the essence of trust. Empathy, including empathic memory of what we have learned from the client, about the client, is required to facilitate this kind of letting go. Derenne (2006) notes that remembering details, both large and small, is one of the most essential aspects of her role as a child psychiatrist and fosters her ability to connect with ED clients and their families. After many years of practice, I am still humbled by how a client can be touched and surprised by my memory of their best friend’s name, the date of a particular loss they’ve endured, or the adjectives they’ve used to describe an experience in their lives. Cousin to active listening and mindful attending, empathic memory and present empathy, void of triteness, provide evidence to clients that they matter. Being listened todheard, understood, taken in, remembered, without being intruded upondis a reflection of the process of introjection and empathy without the loss of self, abandonment of self-identity, or annihilation of other so many clients fear. This level of trust, then, potentiates the possibility for the client that even their “worst selves” might be tolerated without retaliation (Beresin et al., 1989; Derenne, 2006; Zerbe, 1995). Such are particularly critical moments in the therapeutic process, repeating multiple times in different forms at different stages of the therapy. Depending on the manifestation of the client’s worst self, often impacted by comorbid conditions or characterological constellations, it can be more or less intense/activating for both client and clinician. As in Dante Alighieri’s classic poem, The Divine Comedia 1: Inferno (1939), the “pilgrim,” like our clients, must not be left alone in the deepest spirals of Hell. Just as Virgil, fortified by the guide Beatrice, “stays the course,” so must we as clinicians, thereby deepening the therapeutic relationship and the work of healing. Endurance and frustration tolerance. A high frustration tolerance, and the ability to endure ambiguity and the often lengthy ED recovery process, are essential qualities for the effective ED therapist (Andersen & Corson, 2001; Bunnell, 2009; Davis, 2009a, b; Derenne, 2006; Zerbe, 1995). Often permeated with high levels of anxiety and angst, ED treatment is


THE EFFECTIVE CLINICIAN’S CUPBOARD

201

more like a cross-country trek than a 50-yard dash. For the therapist, “staying the course” requires a stamina characterized by practiced mindfulness and compassionate curiosity toward personal experiences of counter-transference, counter-reaction, and the registering of visceral information. Without it, clinicians can run the risk of foregoing what may be clinically indicated and instead doing what might feel “easier,” like end treatment prematurely, or more commonly, elect to avoid or placate rather than confront the therapeutic challenge. With “mindsight” (Siegel, 2009), informed decisions about if, how, and to what extent the therapist overtly uses visceral information, are matters of skill largely influenced by theoretical approach and timing. Staying the course does not mean a symbiotic or parasitic joining with the client that results in collusion with the ED symptomatology, coddling or “water pouring” (Kvidera, 2007) in the fires of ED Hell. Instead, it is doing what is clinically necessary (e.g., expanding the treatment team or utilizing a higher level of care) with a mix of humanness, sound clinical judgment, honest feedback, and respectful confrontation while enduring the however-long haul of the healing journey. Humbleness and transparency. Finding balance between humble confidence in our clinical opinions (Derenne, 2006), and a non-investment in being right can be a challenge. Narcissistic tendencies, the need to control, and competition with the client are not compatible with effective treatment (Andersen & Corson, 2001), as they replicate the very interpersonal dynamics our patients guard against through their ED symptoms (Beresin et al., 1989). Power struggles typically derail the process and certainly distract from our clients making changes or confronting their barriers to doing so. At its heart, humbleness is the recognition that, while we may do our best to provide sagacious guidance and work in collaboration with the client, we are not in charge of the client’s healing pace or decisions. This is not a cop-out, or reason to do our jobs less well. Neither is it justification for failing to improve in those areas in which we are deficient. Ultimately, it is the client’s recovery, not our own, and not ours to do for them. We are neither savior, nor white knight, nor recast of another in their family or social system. Our honesty and transparency with clients on this matter demonstrates the regard we hold for them as fellow human beings, our belief in their inherent redemptive capacities, and our respect for their rights to personal power. It allows clinicians to hold the hope for healing without unrealistic expectations. Ability to self-nurture. The daily practice of treating people with ED requires adequate self-nurturance in addition to our “base” of clinical training (Andersen and Corson, 2001; Derenne, 2006; Warren, Crowley, Olivardia & Schoen, 2009; Zerbe, 1995). Its importance is at least three-pronged: (a) to connect us with a source, singular or conglomerate, of abundance from which to receive and replenish our stores of ingredients; (b) to insulate us from chronic and debilitating burnout (Rubel, 1986); and (c) to infuse and enliven us both personally and professionally. To be of best service to our clients and to ourselves, we must contemplate and honor how, what, and by whom we are fed, as well as how we best digest, metabolize, and utilize this nourishment. Professional self-care includes clinical supervision, peer consultation and, when appropriate, personal therapy (Andersen & Corson, 2001; Yager & Edelstein, 1987). Zerbe (1995), among others, adds to the requisites what I refer to as “convening the lineage,” reading or rereading the works of forebearers in our fields of practice. This practice provides perspective, space to breathe, intellectual connection, and a means to understand our own


202


counter-transference, improving both our clinical endurance and frustration tolerance. Developing a regular practice of continuing education, or a sense of community at professional conferences, may also serve to reconnect us to our source. Personal self-care, of course, influences us as professionals. Healthy, satisfying relationships with friends, family, and colleagues, as well as interests and passions aside from work can remind us we need not be enveloped by the flames of our clients’ ED infernos. The world is bigger and broader than what occurs within the four walls of our offices, just as our clients’ worlds extend beyond the immediate treatment experience. Active engagement in our lives can keep us from a narcissistic investment in overvaluing our clients’ progress as a measure of our being “good enough” as people and as clinicians.

Summary of the Clinician’s Ingredients With a connection to source, or the something-bigger, however personally defined, therapists are more able to calibrate the workings of their intuitive sensibilities. Coordinating these sensibilities with the blending of our basic clinical knowledge, accumulated experience, clinical training, and psychotherapeutic techniques, allows us to finely adjust and appropriately titrate therapeutic interventions according to the stage of treatment and the unique needs of our clients. Spiced with courage and pinches of appropriate humor, levity, creativity, and adaptability, and folded into the therapeutic alliance, “non-possessive warmth” (Andersen & Corson, 2001, p. 356), “unconditional positive regard” (Rogers, 1961, p. 47), “active and worthwhile engagement” (Davis, 2009b, p. 6), embodied authenticity, being real, empathy, trust, endurance, high frustration tolerance, humbleness, transparency, and an ability to self nurture, heighten the likelihood of success in ED treatment. The question remains: If these are the essential ingredients for the clinician, what exactly are the fruits of our labor meant to help produce?

THE SUCCESSFUL CLIENT’S RECIPE Product or Process: Averting Disaster in a Recipe for Recovery Nowhere is the scientist/practitioner gap in the ED field more gaping than when it comes to answering this most elemental question: What is recovery? Fundamental to this inquiry is in whom, and by what processes, we invest the power to decide. Locating the sources of definitive authority (i.e., in the researcher, clinician, patient, and/or caregivers) determines the means by which we seek answers. Views from the ivory tower, and those from the therapy couch, provide dramatically different vantage points. The imperative to integrate these perspectives is where researchers, clinicians, and patients may ultimately find common and fertile ground. The unfortunate divide in definitions of ED recovery parallels empirical design lines; exclusively quantitative or qualitative approaches yield vastly different results. Language is instructive in this discourse. Objective, static “outcomes” are typically the subject of quantitative research, whereas the subjective, process of “recovery” is the object of qualitative investigations. Kazdin (2009) suggests that qualitative research is a “natural way of bridging


THE SUCCESSFUL CLIENT’S RECIPE

203

research and practice,” emphasizing the need for multiple methodologies as well as their complementarity (p. 277). A fundamental criticism of traditional quantitative ED research involves the nearly exclusive focus on the physical parameters of recovery from what are clearly biopsychosocial illnesses. Examining only the overt symptoms (e.g., restoration of weight or menses) and grouping outcomes ignores the psychosocial and spiritual dimensions of ED recovery as well as the diverse and essential personhood of the individuals subject to their torment. Emphasizing the need for outcome research to include narrative, and qualitative reports, Zerbe (2008) succinctly states that the patient is always an “n of 1” and should be “considered as a human being first, not simply as a member of a diagnostic group” (p. 289). The remainder of this chapter will review “reports” from both sides of the empirical design divide, provide suggestions for future investigative efforts, and conclude with a synthesis of what researchers, practitioners, and patients bring to bear on the definition of recovery and how it is best mediated.

Outcome Literature: Coming in From the Outside Fifty years of quantitative research devoted to ED outcomes has provided extensive data, despite failing to provide comparable, consistent, and clinically meaningful definitions of what recovery entails (Berkman, Lohr & Bulik, 2007; Couturier & Lock, 2006; Jarman & Walsh, 1999; Steinhausen, 2008; Wonderlich, Gordon, Mitchell, Crosby & Engel, 2009). Inconsistent definitions of successful outcome, as well as variations in design, measures, outcome ratings, dependent variables, populations, diagnostic categories and criteria, and the duration of follow-up, have generated an unwieldy body of literature with radical discrepancies. Indeed, given published ranges of recovery rates between 0e92% for anorexia nervosa (AN) (Steinhausen, 2002) and 13e69% for BN (Herzog et al., 1993), achieving recovery could be metaphorically construed as either a cakewalk or a death march. Additionally, these methodological inconsistencies compromise the practical interpretations and implications of the outcome data. For example, definitions of outcome applied to variable patient populations (e.g., inpatient vs. outpatient) generate different results with clinically meaningful relevance. Randomized, controlled therapeutic trials, limited mostly to tertiary care sites, are associated with high dropout rates and poorer outcomes, and their subjects may not be representative of the ED population typically seen in therapists’ offices (Johnson, Lund & Yates, 2003; Steinhausen, 2002; Zerbe, 2008). Definitions of recovery in quantitative outcome research. Despite Morgan and Russell’s (1975) seminal efforts to establish and expand recovery criteria for AN to include the physical, psychological, and social aspects of functioning, subsequent research inconsistently assessed all these factors. The majority of succeeding AN outcome research relied solely on the physical parameters of weight, menses, and eating symptoms (Steinhausen, 2002). Similarly, researchers have narrowly equated a positive outcome for BN with cessation of binging and purging (Jarman & Walsh, 1999). These “outside” measures of recovery provide researchers and clinicians with static snapshots of behavioral controldmomentary “product” analyses, which fail to inform us about the unfolding, multidimensional “process” of recovery. A second common definition of recovery is simply “absence of diagnosis,” meaning that the patient no longer meets the full diagnostic criteria of AN, BN or binge-eating disorder


204


(BED). It is not clear if these patients would otherwise meet criteria for Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS), the most frequent ED diagnosis, with comparable psychopathology to AN and BN (Fairburn et al., 2007). Moreover, patients may continue to be in psychiatric distress despite being considered subclinical or “recovered” from the gross physical and behavioral features of EDs (Jarman & Walsh, 1999). As Zerbe (2008) notes, “patients will not [achieve] life fulfillment if they still have poor social networks, feel badly about their self-image and personal well-being, lack a sense of belonging.or struggle with a lack of selfcohesion” (p. 288). Insight is no more curative than behavioral control. What research equates with endpoints in treatment (symptom resolution), clinicians consider as starting points in recovery. From a clinical standpoint, until patients are nutritionally and physically stable, the real work cannot begin. In fact, research on AN recovery has demonstrated that only women who had, in addition to behavioral improvement, also achieved cognitive recovery, were “indistinguishable from female controls on self-report measures of body dissatisfaction.general symptomatology, endorsement of the thin ideal.drive for success, fear of failure, harm avoidance.perfectionism and self-esteem” (Bachner-Melman, Zohar & Ebstein, 2006, p. 700). Thirdly, Steinhausen (2002) describes ratings of global outcomes (good, fair, poor) as the most common form of AN recovery classification. This nondescript conceptualization of recovery is subject to the same criticism noted above, as freedom from overt, clinical symptomatology is not equivalent to eradication of the illness. Lastly, contemporary efforts to remedy the constrictive definitions of ED recovery in quantitative research have reincorporated measures of psychological and psychosocial functioning (e.g. Noordenbos & Seubring, 2006), such as reductions in fears and preoccupations about weight and food, and improved body image. Given that weight restoration tends to occur sooner and more often than psychological improvement in AN, outcome criteria must incorporate assessment of emotional and cognitive functioning (Couturier & Lock, 2006; Jarman & Walsh, 1999; Steinhausen, 2002). Quantitative analyses of outcome are beginning to include quality of life measures (Adair et al., 2007), contributing timely and cogent insights into our understanding of recovery. Although still only “product” assessments, these efforts attempt to examine the full-bodied, robust and complex progression of recovery. Duration as a defining factor in recovery. Empirical inconsistency in durations of asymptomatic status (from 8 weeks to 3 years) further obscures the outcome picture (Steinhausen, 2008; Von Holle et al., 2008). In general, stricter definitions requiring longer durations of both weight and psychological improvement are associated with the lowest recovery rates for both AN and BN. Investigators have recently rallied to utilize empirically derived and tested consensus definitions that incorporate the full range of ED symptomatology evaluated over a sufficient period of time (Couturier & Lock, 2006; Frank, 2005; Keel, Mitchell, Davis, Fieselman & Crow, 2000; Kordy et al., 2002; Von Holle et al., 2008). These investigations clearly distinguish remissions (briefer periods of symptom absence) from recovery (maintenance of remission for a predetermined amount of time), but the duration criteria remain critically different. Kordy et al. (2002) suggested a 1-year minimum duration of symptom abstinence, including psychological parameters of recovery. Strober, Freeman & Morrell (1997) indicated that it took nearly 5 years for physical symptoms of adolescent AN to fully recover and another 2 years for the psychological factors to normalize. Von Holle et al. (2008) utilized



205

a 3-year period of complete symptom abstinence to assess temporal patterns of outcome in a transdiagnostic sample. Their findings yielded sobering long-term outcomes. After 15 years, only 16% of those with AN, and 25% of those with BN, met recovery criteria. They concluded that 10 years post ED onset appears to be the critical juncture in which recovery either consolidates or the condition becomes chronic.

Summary of Outcome Definitions Methodological variability is the one consistent factor in ED outcome literature, generating data which suggest recovery is as possible as it is improbable. Patience and perseverance, previously noted as integral ingredients in the successful ED treatment provider, appear equally essential to the patient. Quantitatively derived definitions of recovery are limited by their inherent depiction of it as a static state: a product versus a process. Additionally, these approaches locate the source of definitive authority in the researchers, creating arbitrary and inconsistent determinants of outcome, and overlooking the nuances, voice, and perspectives of the patients and their caregivers. Finally, populations conspicuously overlooked in outcome research include children, males, EDNOS, BED, late onset EDs, minorities, and primary caregivers.

Recovery Literature: Coming Out from the Inside The shortcomings of quantitative clinical research are ubiquitous (Kazdin, 2009). The above synopsis is not meant as a wholesale indictment of research practices; indeed, data derived from quantitative inquiries provide invaluable information about group norms and variables. The relevant gap is less between science and practice as it is within scientific practices. As with most things, “the devil is in the details” and the preferential emphasis on quantitative approaches to characterize and assess ED recovery has undermined our efforts to both understand our patient’s torment and improve treatment. What has been crucially missing are inquiries that move beyond efforts to understand recovery in favor of those that seek innerstanding (Kimura, 2004) from within the canvas of our patients’ lives. Old paint on canvas, as it ages, sometimes becomes transparent. When that happens, it is possible, in some pictures, to see the original lines: a tree will show through a woman’s dress, a child makes way for a dog, a large boat is no longer on an open sea. This is called “pentimento” because the painter “repented,” changed his or her mind. Perhaps it would be as well to say that the old conception, replaced by a later choice, is a way of seeing and then seeing again. (Hellman, 1973, p. 3)

Recovery is like Hellman’s pentimentoda way of seeing and then seeing again. “Arguably, what patients know AN to be is even more important than what psychotherapists and other health professionals know” (Surgenor, Plumridge & Horn, 2003, p. 23). Professionals on both sides of the gap have failed to provide a clear, consistent, clinically meaningful definition of recovery that is process and diversity-oriented, and informed by those who have lived the experience. To reach innerstandings of recovery, we must get out of linear models of questioning derived from “experts” perspectives, and talk with the real expertsdthose who have experienced recovery.


206


In order to recover the definition of recovery from obscurity, we need to bring all of the relevant parties and perspectives to the proverbial table, and listen our way into the questions and answers rather than only assess answers to predetermined questions. Qualitative research is the ideal forum in which multiple voices and viewpoints can be distinguished and illuminated.

Qualitative Research: Bridging the Tower and the Trenches Following his tenure as president of the American Psychiatric Association, Kazdin (2009) underscored the priority of improving patient care by bridging science and practice through the use of qualitative research: It includes an intense, detailed, and in-depth focus on individuals and their contexts..[It] can identify details of the experience; generate new theory, constructs, and measures..Traditional quantitative group research may not [be] able to reveal novel themes and processes of recovery in such an in-depth way (p. 277).

Zerbe (2008) eloquently echoed and articulated the imperative to consider ED patient’s viewpoints in clinical research and practice. “Qualitative data speak to the humanity of the individual, they immerse themselves in those characteristics [patients]. include in constructing a life well lived.and with those specific skills and strengths that enable.[patients] to love.work [and] face down destructive symptoms” (p. 291). Maine (1985) was a forerunner in efforts to elucidate patients’ voices in her phenomenological research regarding their understanding of the process of both their illness and recovery. Bruch’s (1988) pioneering work, Conversations with Anorexics, and MacLeod’s (1987) The Art of Starvation provided rich and compelling peeks into the inner sanctum of AN, while Beresin et al. (1989) offered an early empirical analysis of patients’ views on recovery. Fortunately, qualitative research regarding ED recovery is burgeoning. Some applications of these methods, such as feminist grounded theory approaches, have provided critical contributions to the recovery literature, fleshing out patients’ perspectives well beyond restoration of weight and other physical parameters of improvement (Bowlby, 2008; Garrett, 1997; Jarman & Walsh, 1999; Keski-Rahkonen & Tozzi, 2005; Lamoureux & Bottorff, 2005; Noordenbos & Seubring, 2006; Nordbo et al., 2008; Serpell, Treasure, Teasdale & Sullivan, 1999; Serpell & Treasure, 2002; Surgenor et al., 2003; Tozzi, Sullivan, Fear, McKenzie & Bulik, 2003; Weaver, Wuest & Ciliska, 2005). Paralleling the outcome literature, most studies have examined the phenomenology of AN and BN, while recovery perspectives from patients with BED, EDNOS, and late onset ED, as well as males and children, have been categorically overlooked. Unlike the outcome literature, however, the findings in the qualitative studies have yielded remarkable consistency with regard to how patients define, view, and experience recovery. The most distinct difference between quantitative and qualitative definitions of recovery is that patients clearly view recovery not as an endpoint, but as a multidimensional process in which they are simultaneously and variously making progress and experiencing setbacks (Pettersen & Rosenvinge, 2002). Lamoureux and Bottorff (2005) portrayed this experience as patients “inching away from anorexia,” quoting one patient as saying, “that’s what characterized the struggle for me.the forward and the back” (p. 175). This seeming incongruence is an ordinary occurrence in the clinical context: the same week a patient skipped her snacks, she risked conflict in connection, genuinely expressed and experienced disquieting feelings,



207

and/or made a decision without seeking another’s approval. As improvements within the various dimensions of the recovery process do not occur in a linear, systematic fashion, the outcome literature has been of limited use to clinicians. In their study of the journey of recovery from BN, Peters & Fallon (1994) described three main dimensions: denial to reality; alienation to connection; and passivity to personal power. Platt (1992) also conceptualized recovery from BN as a three-stage developmental process: (a) shifting the relationship to the ED from an ego-syntonic to ego-dystonic status; (b) learning to tolerate uncomfortable physical and psychological states without ED symptoms; and (c) improving self-care and self-esteem through adaptive coping skills. Consistent with other reports (Lamoureux & Bottorff, 2005; Pettersen & Rosenvinge, 2002), coming to view their illness as the problem rather than the solution, appears to be a fundamental necessity for patients. Beyond the initial “unleashing” of denial, patterns of progression with regard to their physical, emotional, relational, spiritual, and sociopolitical well-being are profoundly personal and unique. I wrote of this in my own recovery in 1980 (McGilley, personal diary): If I extract myself to a different dimension, I’m aware of how tortured I am by my turbulent emotional inertia. I wonder, stoically and fearfully, if in like comparison, Sisyphus would have pursued his existential task of rolling his ill-fated rock up the hill had he seen his dilemma from afar? Faced solely with the rock, I too might persist, if only for the purpose of the struggle. But now, faced with both the rock and the weighty awareness of the “Big Picture,” I find myself frantically paralyzed. In a frenzy of motionlessness. Falling with my feet stubbornly planted, gathering bruises that refuse to expel their ache. Even more frightening than the prospect of enlightenment, is that first real jolt of sentience, the piercing scream of nerves released from denial’s hearty grip. Isn’t there an internal gate-keeper, an emotional parachute that will ensure I don’t reenter the realm of my senses free-fall and fragment into so many brittle pieces?

Across diagnoses, methods of assessment, and duration of illness, patients were unwavering in their experience that recovery entails something akin to the painter’s repenting: some version of a reconciliation or reunion with one’s self. Variously described as “finding me” (Weaver et al., 2005), reclaiming oneself as “good enough” (Lamoureux & Bottorff, 2005), or simply as “self-acceptance” (Pettersen & Rosenvinge, 2002), recovery demands a willingness to be “real again, vulnerable again, to the full range of human experience, all shades of gray included. Viewed from the anorexic ‘shadowlands,’ this invitation appears to be an absurd request, something like re-exiting the birth canal after achieving our full adult size” (McGilley, 2000). As a current patient, waxing and waning in the early stages of recovery defines it: “Recovery is a continuum of finding and [reconnecting] the part of ‘you’ that has been disconnected for so long, and.aligning this scared, shadowed self with a new, healthy self ready to make the transition into new life.” In one of the few qualitative analyses to include a mixed diagnostic sample, Pettersen and Rosenvinge (2002) used an open-ended interview process to assess what factors were helpful in recovery and what recovery meant to them. Patients were required to have received treatment and to have had an ED for at least 3 years. The majority of the sample had EDNOS, and the rest were nearly equally divided between AN, BN, and BED. The overarching motivation to recover was the desire for a better life. Participants’ definitions of recovery were classified into seven general aspects: (a) accepting self and body; (b) ceasing to allow food to dominate life or be used to resolve problems; (c) finding a life purpose; (d) identifying and having the courage to express emotions; (e) diminishing anxiety and depression; (f) fulfilling one’s


208


potential versus conforming to other’s expectations; and (g) improving social functioning. Two other findings are noteworthy. Firstly, participants noted the capacity to “function sexually and emotionally in a relationship with a stable partner” as vital to their experience of recovery (p. 68). Issues related to sexuality are rarely mentioned in the recovery literature. Secondly, referring to the mixed blessings inherent to recovery, participants emphasized “[experiencing] life as rather difficult without their eating disorder” (p. 68). In direct contrast to outcome literature which necessitates symptom abstinence as defining in recovery, these patients “defined themselves as recovered despite the presence of symptoms of eating disorders, anxiety, and depression” (p. 68). The authors concluded that “symptom reduction may not stand out as a goal per se, but rather as a means to accomplish more functional interpersonal relations, thinking, and problem solving strategies” (p. 69). Space limitations do not allow for a full rendering of the rich and nuanced aspects of recovery unveiled by qualitative research. However, a “recipe for recovery” derived by an inpatient group I once conducted, illustrates the concordant and enduring nature of recovery phenomenology (Box 12.1). Whether EDs are curable or chronic, and/or whether a patient is viewed as recovered or recovering is distinctly debatable among professionals and patients (Root, 1990; Schaefer, 2009). Costin (2007b), a recovered therapist, is decisive in her view that recovery is fully obtainable. Once recovered, food and weight have been put into proper perspective and

BOX 12.1

RECIPE FOR RECOVERY 1 strong dose of commitment 1 cup honesty 1 cup faith ½ cup openness (assertiveness) ½ cup positive attitude ¼ cup group therapy ¼ cup individual therapy ¼ cup support from family and friends 1 heaping cup of sexuality 1½ cups self-esteem and identity 1 cup moderate exercise with a good body image 1½ cups of love 1 cup of reckoning history 1½ cups sense of humor 1 cup food Designated dose of medications

Start out with a strong dose of commitment. Mix in honesty and faith. Combine attitude with openness and add until thoroughly blended. In a separate bowl, mix group therapy, individual therapy, and family support. Beat well and slowly add sexuality. Peel identity down to the core and stir in self-esteem. Generously add love. Fold in food and humor, alternating with sifted history. Carefully combine the first bowl with the second. Pour into a well-greased body image. Bake at 350 as long as needed to become real and satisfied. When cooled, top with 1 cup moderate exercise and medications as needed. Result: Healthy, happy, whole person who loves herself!



209

“what you weigh is not more important than who you are.. You will not compromise your health or betray your soul to look a certain way, wear a certain size or reach a certain number on a scale” (p. 164). A former patient, Claire, several years into alcohol and ED recovery, offers an alternative definition and perspective: Recovery.cannot be measured. It is not tangible or visible. It lies within the individual and during the process manifests itself in, although subtle, outward signs. Recovery is finding the courage to tend toward things that bring benefit to health and spirit even when in some cases the individual tends to gravitate toward destructive or harmful behaviors. It is constantly evolving and changing. Therefore, I don’t think we ever truly reach a ‘recovered’ state. We are spiritual beings in human vessels and we won’t be fully restored until we are fully spirit.

Another patient, a group member and dear friend of Claire’s, whose illness and recovery unfolded in a parallel fashion, respectfully disagrees: Although I am on a continuum of self-improvement, I consider myself recovered. The switch from ‘in recovery’ to ‘recovered’ happened when I realized that no matter whatdthrough illness, death, despair, and the darkness of depressiondI would never go back to where I was. I still feel pain, I feel it quite often. The difference is that I have finally figured out that food or lack thereof will not ease the pain. I now cry it out, dance it out, talk it out, write it out, sleep it out, sing it out, and laugh it out. I might talk too much, move too much, cry too much and feel too muchdbut I will choose that ‘too much’ over the nothingness that the disorder gave me any day. I will never.starve it out again. It doesn’t work, and that’s one lesson I’ve learned that I just won’t forget.

My model embraces both perspectives. Patients fundamentally recover from the active symptomatic aspects of their ED, what Schaefer (2009) describes as “Recovered (Period),” while remaining in a process of recovering from the underlying traumas, intrapsychic and interpersonal conflicts, emotional and temperamental vulnerabilities, and cultural stressors that co-conspired to culminate in the onset of their ED. Spiritual issues have long been underscored in the recovery literature despite being more newly emphasized in academic forums. Somewhere within the recovery process, a spiritual shift occurs. It could be inspired by an AN patient’s “first” plate of crispy fries, or by being reflected in the eyes of their beloved, but sooner or later, this dimension is tapped. Beresin et al. (1989) likened recovery to a psychological rebirth, while others have noted reconnecting with nature, finding purpose and making meaning of one’s life (Garrett, 1997). In my own case, the existential leap recovery required had to do with living, loving, and losing in what had otherwise literally become an unbearable world: “Why live if loving hurts so much?” (McGilley, 2000, p. 5). For many of us, finding our place in the world, a sense of belonging, or our “connection to sourcedor the something bigger,” is the redemptive blessing of recovery. Two of the qualitative research contributions on ED recovery warrant further mention. The first provides a rare effort to elaborate a theory of the recovery process. Using a feminist grounded theory approach, Weaver et al. (2005) analyzed interviews of twelve women recovering from AN to discern “the central organizing process for how women recover” (p. 190). They constructed a theory of self-development, a dynamic helix, in which women move from “perilous self-soothing to informed self-care” (p. 191). In perilous self-soothing, patients wrestle with issues of identity and status in society. In this model, AN is understood as


210


a means of providing recognition and a contrived identity at the expense of compromised health and well-being. Through improved self-awareness, self-differentiation, and self-regulation, recovering patients reach a turning point labeled “finding me” in which they gradually move towards informed self-care. This stage involves developing a sense of one’s strengths and weaknesses, managing emotions, and maintaining intimate and meaningful relationships. Of greatest relevance is their comment regarding the social underpinnings of EDs and what I’ve referred to as the “innerstandings” of the recovery process. Emphasizing that recovery factors and their impact must be understood in context, they concluded that: “both perilous self-soothing and informed self-care arise from women’s interactions within social structure and not as individual intrapsychic processes, [underscoring] the inappropriateness of relying on personality characteristics, discreet behavioral responses, and single events to evaluate AN and its recovery” (p. 202). Finally, Jarman and Walsh (1999) were prescient in their efforts to integrate the best of what we have learned about recovery from the research/practice fields. They offered four compelling suggestions: creating a comprehensive biopsychosocial model of recovery; using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies including client’s views; recognizing the limitations of different measures and methods; and connecting ED recovery research and other psychotherapy process and outcome research. By 2009, we had achieved moderate success, at best, in applying these suggestions. Much remains to be done before we can confidently, consistently, and comprehensively evaluate and elucidate the experience of recovery from all informed perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS: BRIDGING EXPERIENCE AND EMPIRICISM Just as the client’s voice matters in the treatment process, so should it be included in efforts to define outcome. An integrated use of quantitative and qualitative research approaches would complement and expand traditionally derived empirical data. By bringing all the relevant parties to the table, “a combined methodological approach could also enable a multiple stakeholder (e.g. client, clinician, academic) perspective to be incorporated into the evaluation process” (Jarman & Walsh, 1999, p. 784). Finally, the perspective of recovered therapists is just beginning to gain serious consideration in the field, lending another gap-bridging dimension to this important inquiry (Bloomgarden, Gerstein & Moss, 2003; Bowlby, 2008; Costin, 2009; McGilley, 2000). A change in language may also invite new perspectives. The word “integrity”, which means “the state of being whole, entire, or undiminished,” seems to better capture the essence of what we’ve been referring to as recovery. As Hillman describes (1994), integrity also has to do with a kind of wisdom, a way of “knowing together” and “accessing a more subtle kind of wisdom that depends on letting go of those old mental categories” (p. 86). If we were to conceptualize recovery as a return to a state of wholeness, and we were to go about assessing it with thinking hearts, what more could we learn about the harrowing world of EDs and the expansive world beyond its borders? Fitting and timely, Siegel (2009) provides a compelling neurobiological basis for the concept of integration, and therapists’ roles as integrators. Emphasizing the relational capacity for changing brain structures through the sharing of “information flow,” Siegel


CONCLUSIONS: BRIDGING EXPERIENCE AND EMPIRICISM

211

argues that specific clinical interventions can literally stimulate the integrative fibers of the patient’s brain. Fostering this “vertical integration” restores or improves the patient’s body/mind connection, so critically impaired in the ED population. “Health,” in Siegel’s conceptualization, is defined as integration. “Harmony” is the subjective experience of integration. Perhaps recovery is best likened to a process of seeking harmonic healing. In sum, bridging the research/practice gap is going to require a fundamental shift in how we approach inquiry (from asking specific questions to inviting open dialog), the degree of control we exert over variables, and the kind of consistency we expect from the answers. Certain ambiguities must be tolerated and accepted; such is the nature of both science and human healing. “Science is not about control. It is about cultivating a perpetual condition of wonder in the face of something that forever grows one step richer and subtler than our latest theory about it. It is about reverence, not mastery” (Power, 1992, p. 411). Like those we treat, we succumb to the same alluring qualities of ease and concreteness in our efforts to evaluate the hard and fluid complexities of recovery. Clinically meaningful outcome research requires contextually and collaboratively considered concepts of recovery and its fostering agents. Only then can we begin to define a true recipe for success for those suffering with ED.

References Adair, C., Marcoux, G., Cram, B., Ewashen, C., Chafe, J., Cassin, S. E., . Brown, K. E. (2007). Development and multi-site validation of a new condition-specific quality of life measure for eating disorders. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 23. Alighieri, D. (1939). The divine comedy I: Inferno. Translation/commentary by J.D. Sinclair. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. American Psychiatric Association (2006). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). American Journal of Psychiatry 1101e1185. Andersen, A. E., & Corson, P. W. (2001). Characteristics of an ideal psychotherapist for eating disordered patients. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 351e359. Bachner-Melman, R., Zohar, A., & Ebstein, R. (2006). An examination of cognitive versus behavioral components of recovery from anorexia nervosa. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194(9), 697e703. Beresin, E., Gordon, C., & Herzog, D. (1989). The process of recovering from anorexia. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 17, 103e130. Berkman, N., Lohr, K., & Bulik, C. (2007). Outcomes of eating disorders: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 293e309. Bloomgarden, A., Gerstein, F., & Moss, C. (2003). The last word: A "recovered enough" therapist. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 11, 163e167. Bowlby, C. (2008). Lessons learned from both sides of the therapy couch: A qualitative exploration of the clinical lives of recovered professionals in the field of eating disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68, 6290. Bruch, H. (1988). Conversations with anorexics. New York, NY: Aronson. Bunnell, D. (2009). Countertransference in the psychotherapy of patients with eating disorders. In M. Maine, W. Davis, & J. Shure (Eds.), Effective clinical practice in the treatment of eating disorders (pp. 79e95). New York, NY: Routledge. Burket, R. C., & Schramm, L. L. (1995). Therapists’ attitudes about treating patients with eating disorders. Southern Medical Journal, 88(8), 813e821. Costin, C. (2009). The embodied therapist: Perspectives on treatment, personal growth, and supervision related to body image. In M. Maine, W. Davis, & J. Shure (Eds.), Effective clinical practice in the treatment of eating disorders (pp. 179e192). New York, NY: Routledge. Costin, C. (2007a). The eating disorder source book (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Costin, C. (2007b). 100 questions and answers about eating disorders. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.


212


Couturier, J., & Lock, J. (2006). What is recovery in adolescent anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39(7), 550e555. Cozolino, L. (2002). The Neuroscience of psychotherapy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton. Davis, W. N. (2009a). Individual psychotherapy for anorexia and bulimia: Making a difference. In M. Maine, W. Davis, & J. Shure (Eds.), Effective clinical practice in the treatment of eating disorders (pp. 35e49). New York, NY: Routledge. Davis, W. N. (2009b, Winter). Individual psychotherapy for eating disorders: Getting a good start. Renfrew Perspectives, 5e7. Derenne, J. (2006). Junior high, revisited. J. Ruskay Rabinor (Ed.) The Therapist’s Voice. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 14, 335e339. Fairburn, C., Cooper, Z., Bohn, K., O’Connor, M., Doll, H., & Palmer, R. (2007). The severity and status of eating disorder NOS: Implications for the DSM-V. Behavior Research & Therapy, 45, 1705e1715. Frank, E. (2005). Describing course of illness: Does our language matter? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 7e8. Garrett, C. (1997). Recovery from anorexia nervosa: A sociological perspective. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 21, 15e34. Hellman, L. (1973). Pentimento. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co. Herzog, D., Sacks, N., Keller, M., Lavori, P., von Ranson, K., & Gray, H. (1993). Patterns and predictors of recovery in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 835e842. Hillman, A. (1994). The dancing animal woman. Norfolk, CT: Bramble Books. Jarman, M., & Walsh, S. (1999). Evaluating recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: Integrating lessons learned from research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 773e788. Johnson, C., Lund, B., & Yates, W. (2003). Recovery rates for anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 798. Kazdin, A. (2009). Bridging science and practice to improve patient care. American Psychologist, 64, 276e278. Keel, P. K., Mitchell, J. E., Davis, T. L., Fieselman, S., & Crow, S. J. (2000). Impact of definitions on the description and prediction of bulimia nervosa outcome. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 377e386. Keski-Rahkonen, A., & Tozzi, F. (2005). The process of recovery in eating disorder sufferers’ own words: An internet-based study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, S80eS86. Kimura, Y. (2004). The book of balance. New York, NY: Paraview. Kordy, H., Palmer, R., Papezova, H., Pellet, J., Richard, M., & Treasure, J. (2002). Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence in eating disorders: Conceptualization and illustration of a validation strategy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 833e846. Kvidera, C. (2007, March). Dialectical behavior therapy. Pesi Seminar: Boulder, CO. Lamoureux, M., & Bottorff, J. (2005). "Becoming the real me": Recovering from anorexia nervosa. Health Care for Women International, 26, 170e188. MacLeod, S. (1987). The art of starvation: A story of anorexia and survival. New York, NY: Schocken. Maine, M. (1985). An existential exploration of the forces contributing to sustaining and ameliorating anorexia nervosa: The recovered patient’s view. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(6-B), 2071 (1986-52919-001). McGilley, B. (2000). On the being and telling of the experience of anorexia: A therapist’s perspective. Renfrew Perspectives, 5(2), 5e7. Morgan, H., & Russell, G. (1975). Value of family background and clinical features as predictors of long-term outcome in anorexia nervosa: Four-year follow-up study of 41 patients. Psychological Medicine, 5, 355e371. Noordenbos, G., & Seubring, A. (2006). Criteria for recovery from eating disorders according to patients and therapists. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 14, 41e54. Nordbo, R., Gulliksen, K., Espeset, E., Skarderud, F., Geller, J., & Holte, A. (2008). Expanding the concept of motivation to change: The content of patients’ wish to recover from anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 635e642. Peters, L., & Fallon, P. (1994). The journey of recovery: Dimensions of change. In P. Fallon, M. Katzman, & S. Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 339e354). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Pettersen, G., & Rosenvinge, J. (2002). Improvement and recovery from eating disorders: A patient perspective. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 10, 61e71.


CONCLUSIONS: BRIDGING EXPERIENCE AND EMPIRICISM

213

Platt, C. (1992). Formerly chronic bulimics’ perspectives of the process of recovery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: California School of Professional Psychology. Powers, R. (1992). The gold bug variations. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Root, M. (1990). Recovery and relapse in former bulimics. Psychotherapy, 27(3), 397e403. Rowling, J. K. (1999). Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban. New York, NY: Scholastic Press. Rubel, J. B. (1986). Burn-out and eating disorder therapists. In F. Larocca (Ed.), Eating disorders: Effective care and treatment (Vol. 1) (pp. 233e246). St. Louis/Tokyo: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc. Schaefer, J. (2009). Good-bye Ed, hello me. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Serpell, L., & Treasure, J. (2002). Bulimia nervosa: Friend or foe? The pros and cons of bulimia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32(2), 164e170. Serpell, L., Treasure, J., Teasdale, J., & Sullivan, V. (1999). Anorexia nervosa: Friend or foe? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 177e186. Siegel, D. (2009, November). Mindsight, self-regulation and attachment: Promoting health by moving from chaos and rigidity to neural integration. Keynote presentation at the 19th Annual Renfrew Foundation Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Steinhausen, H.-C. (2002). The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1284e1293. Steinhausen, H.-C. (2008). Outcome of eating disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 18, 225e242. Strober, M., Freeman, R., & Morrell, W. (1997). The long term course of severe anorexia nervosa in adolescents: Survival analysis of recovery, relapse and outcome predictors over 10e15 years in a prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 339e360. Surgenor, L., Plumridge, E., & Horn, J. (2003). “Knowing one’s self” anorexic: Implications for therapeutic practice. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 22e32. Tozzi, F., Sullivan, P., Fear, J., McKenzie, J., & Bulik, C. (2003). Causes and recovery in anorexia nervosa: The patient’s perspective. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 143e154. Von Holle, A., Pinheiro, A., Thornton, L., Klump, K., Berrettini, W., Brandt, H., . Bulik, C. M. (2008). Temporal patterns of recovery across eating disorder subtypes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 108e117. Warren, C., Crowley, M., Olivardia, R., & Schoen, A. (2009). Treating patients with eating disorders: An examination of treatment providers’ experiences. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 17, 27e45. Weaver, K., Wuest, J., & Ciliska, D. (2005). Understanding women’s journey of recovering from anorexia nervosa. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 188e206. Wonderlich, S., Gordon, K., Mitchell, J., Crosby, R., & Engel, S. (2009). The validity and clinical utility of binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 687e705. Yager, J., & Edelstein, C. (1987). Training therapists to work with eating disorders patients. In P. Beumont, G. D. Burrows, & R. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of eating disorders, Part I: Anorexia and bulimia nervosa (pp. 379e392). New York, NY: Elsevier. Zerbe, K. (1995). Integrating feminist and psychodynamic principles in the treatment of an eating disorder patient: Implications for using countertransference responses. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 59(2), 160e176. Zerbe, K. (2008). Integrated treatment of eating disorders: Beyond the body betrayed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.


C H A P T E R

13 Borderline Personality and Eating Disorders: A Chaotic Crossroads Randy A. Sansone and Lori A. Sansone In this chapter, we discuss the complex and intriguing crossroads between eating disorders (ED) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). We begin by reviewing BPD as a clinical entity and include a description of the disorder that is based on the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders. We then discuss the prevalence of BPD among patients with ED (up to 28% in bulimia nervosa) and review possible diagnostic approaches. Finally, we describe the complex clinical implications when ED and BPD are comorbid, and conclude with a discussion of general treatment strategies and outcome findings.

OVERVIEW OF BPD A DSM Description of BPD BPD is a personality dysfunction that is classified as an Axis II disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000a). Within the 11 Axis II disorders in the current DSM, BPD resides in the Cluster B personality grouping, which consists of personality disorders that are characterized by dramatic, emotional, and erratic features. Within this Cluster, BPD cohabits with narcissistic, antisocial, and histrionic personality disorders. According to the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000a), BPD is characterized by nine clinical features. These are: (i) frantic efforts to avoid abandonment; (ii) a history of unstable and intense relationships with others; (iii) identity disturbance; (iv) impulsivity in at least two functional areas such as spending, sex, substance use, eating, or driving; (v) recurrent suicidal threats or behaviors as well as self-mutilation; (vi) affective instability with marked reactivity of mood; (vii) chronic feelings of emptiness; (viii) inappropriate and intense anger or difficulty controlling anger; and (ix) transient stressinduced paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms. Because only five of the


217


218

13. BORDERLINE PERSONALITY AND EATING DISORDERS: A CHAOTIC CROSSROADS

preceding nine features are required for diagnosis, there are potentially many symptomatic permutations across affected patients.

The Clinical Texture of BPD From a clinical perspective, BPD is characterized by a distinct psychopathological texture. On the surface, patients with BPD appear to have intact social façades such that in fleeting superficial social encounters, they can appear quite normal. However, beneath this thin veneer of social adaptation resides a longstanding history of impairing self-regulatory disturbances and chronic self-destructive behaviors. This unusual and dramatic psychopathological compositeda seemingly normal exterior coupled with a chaotic interiordrepresents the pathognomonic clinical paradox that clinicians encounter in BPD patients. Self-regulation difficulties. Self-regulation difficulties emerge whenever there is a disturbance in the patient’s ability to regulate a core self function. If the regulatory disturbance entails eating behavior, the patient may develop anorexia nervosa (AN) or bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), or obesity. If the regulatory deficit relates to substance intake, the patient may develop alcohol or drug abuse/dependence. In the case of sexual behavior, promiscuity may emerge, and with difficulties in the regulation of pain, chronic pain syndromes may develop. Self-destructive behavior. Self-destructive behaviors are intentional and self-damaging events that may be self-directed (e.g., hitting, cutting, burning oneself; suicide attempts) and/or provoked or elicited from the interpersonal environment (e.g., partner violence, bar fights). While self-destructive behaviors oftentimes function to regulate affect, they may also serve to elicit caring responses from others, sustain a self-destructive identity, and/or assist in fending off an impending quasi-psychotic episode. To meet diagnostic criteria, self-regulation difficulties and self-destructive behaviors must both be consistently present in the patient’s history, with symptoms typically dating back to adolescence or early adulthood. In addition, patients may report symptom substitution, in which one symptom set (e.g., binge eating) dissolves into another (e.g., substance abuse).

The Prevalence of BPD General population. According to the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000a), the prevalence of BPD in the community is around 2%. However, Stone (1986) believes that the rate could be as high as 10%, a figure that may include subthreshold or subclinical cases. Grant et al. (2008) reported a lifetime prevalence rate of 6%. To provide some perspective, the overall prevalence of personality disorders in the general population is around 5e10% (Ellison & Shader, 2003). Clinical populations. The prevalence of BPD has been investigated in a number of clinical settings. For example, in an urban outpatient internal medicine setting, investigators found a prevalence rate of 6.4% (Gross et al., 2002). In resident-provider primary care clinics, which have higher loadings of indigent and low-functioning patients, we have encountered BPD rates up to 25% (Sansone, Wiederman & Sansone, 2000). As for psychiatric settings, Quigley (2005) states that BPD is one of the most frequently encountered Axis II disorders. According to the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric

III. BRIDGING THE GAP: SPECIAL POPULATIONS

BPD: A MULTI-DETERMINED DISORDER

219

Association, 2000a), the prevalence of BPD in outpatient and inpatient psychiatric populations is 10 and 20%, respectively. In more contemporary samples, we found that 22% of outpatients in a diagnostically conservative university-based clinic (i.e., residents are cautioned about premature Axis II diagnosis; Sansone, Rytwinski & Gaither, 2003) and nearly 50% of those in an urban inpatient sample (Sansone, Songer & Gaither, 2001) evidenced borderline personality traits or disorder. Borderline personality disorder and eating disorders. Through an extensive review of the empirical literature, we found that the prevalence of BPD among patients with ED is a function of the specific DSM ED diagnosis (Sansone, Levitt & Sansone, 2005). In contrast to purely restrictive eating behavior, eating pathology characterized by impulsivity (e.g., binging, vomiting, laxative abuse) evidenced much higher rates of BPD. Specifically, the prevalence rate was 10% in patients with restricting AN; 25% in binge-eating/purging AN; 28% in BN; 12% in BED; and 14% among a sample of obese patients seeking gastric surgery (Sansone et al., 2005; Sansone, Schumacher, Wiederman & Routsong-Weichers, 2008). From a broader perspective, these data indicate that the prevalence of BPD among those with ED is 5e14 times the rate encountered in the general population. This observation conveys that in treating patients with EDs, clinicians will invariably encounter those with comorbid BPD.

BPD: A MULTI-DETERMINED DISORDER Like many psychiatric disorders, BPD appears to be a multi-determined disorder (Bandelow et al., 2005; Paris, 2005) with contributions from genetics, repetitive trauma in childhood, parental psychopathology, family dysfunction, and a possible triggering event. Permutations of these risk factors appear to vary from patient to patient and the thresholds for symptom precipitation remain unknown.

Genetics Recent investigations indicate that genetics meaningfully contribute to the development of BPD. Distel et al. (2008) found that genetics accounted for 42% of the variance, although what appears to be inherited is non-specific (Skodol et al., 2002). In other words, while BPD as a disorder is not directly inherited, core biological vulnerabilities may be genetically passed on, such as affective instability, poor impulse management, and/or dysfunctional cognitive/ perceptual styles (Goodman, New & Siever, 2004). In further support of a genetic relationship, a review of the literature disclosed that, compared with controls, relatives of patients with BPD evidenced greater frequencies of impulse spectrum disorders including BPD (White, Gunderson, Zanarini & Hudson, 2003).

Early Developmental Trauma Repetitive trauma in early development appears to be a principal risk factor for the development of BPD. The majority of empirical studies confirms a statistical association between childhood trauma and BPD in adulthood (Sansone & Sansone, 2000). Trauma types most associated with BPD include repetitive physical, sexual, and emotional abuses as well as, in some cases, the witnessing of violence. As an example, in a large sample of patients


220


with BPD, Zanarini, Dubo, Lewis & Williams (1997) found that 85% of participants reported histories of childhood trauma.

Parental Psychopathology/Family Dysfunction Parental psychopathology and family dysfunction also appear to contribute to the development of BPD (Sansone & Sansone, 2009; see Box 13.1). Parent and family dynamics associated with the development of BPD include neglect and a lack of empathy (Yatsko, 1996); “biparental failure” (Zanarini et al., 2000); poor relationships with parents (Norden, Klein, Donaldson, Pepper & Klein, 1995); and family interactions that are invalidating, conflictual, negative, or critical (Fruzzetti, Shenk & Hoffman, 2005). Parents have been described by offspring with BPD as negative (Gunderson & Lyoo, 1997); uncaring and over-controlling (Parker et al., 1999; Weaver & Clum, 1993; Zweig-Frank & Paris, 1991); unempathetic (Guttman & Laporte, 2000); conflictual (Allen et al., 2005); invalidating and critical (Fruzzetti et al., 2005); aversive, less nurturing, and less affectionate (Johnson, Cohen, Chen, Kasen & Brook, 2006); emotionally withholding (Zanarini, Gunderson, Marino, Schwartz & Frankenburg, 1989); over-protective (Gagnon, 1993; Torgersen & Alnaes, 1992); over-involved as well as under-involved (Allen & Farmer, 1996); and hostile (Hayashi, Suzuki & Yamamoto, 1995). These data suggest that most patients with BPD experience dysfunctional relationships with parents and develop in unstable family environments.

Triggering Events One final risk factor for the development of BPD is the role of a triggering event. Zanarini and Frankenburg (1997) described these events as acute psychosocial stressors that appear to abruptly precipitate the onset of BPD symptomatology, although this phenomenon has received little study.

BOX 13.1

EXAMPLES OF PARENTAL DYNAMICS THAT MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER • • • •

Neglect and a lack of empathy “Biparental failure” Poor relationships with offspring Interactions that are invalidating, conflictual, negative, or critical • Negativity • Uncaring and over-controlling • Unempathetic

• Conflictual relationships with offspring • Invalidating and critical • Aversive, less nurturing, and less affectionate • Emotionally withholding • Over-protective • Over-involved as well as under-involved • Hostile


THE DIAGNOSIS OF BPD

221

THE DIAGNOSIS OF BPD Because of the high rates of BPD among patients with EDs, every patient should be assessed for the disorder. Symptom assessment for the diagnosis of this Axis II disorder can be challenging in the presence of active eating pathology (Vitousek & Stumpf, 2006). Explicitly, highly symptomatic patients can appear very chaotic and borderline-like, such that accurate Axis II diagnosis may have to wait until the stabilization of the ED symptoms. Because the diagnosis of BPD is stigmatizing, clinicians need to have a reliable screening or diagnostic procedure for this complex disorder.

Clinical Diagnosis Clinical assessment can be readily accomplished through the use of the DSM criteria, which were presented in the previous section. A briefer diagnostic alternative is the clinical adaptation of the original Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB; Kolb & Gunderson, 1980), which is shown in Box 13.2. There are only five criteria for assessment and these can be organized around the acronym, P-I-S-I-A, which enables easy recall in the clinical setting. All five criteria are required (i.e., one type of quasi-psychotic phenomenon, longstanding impulsivity, an intact social façade, chaotic interpersonal relationships, and a chronically BOX 13.2

THE ADAPTED GUNDERSON CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER P Psychotic/quasi-psychotic episodes: transient, fleeting, brief episodes that tend to emerge with stress; these may include: • Depersonalization • Derealization • Dissociation • Rage reactions • Paranoia (the patient recognizes the illogical nature of their suspiciousness) • Fleeting or isolated hallucinations or delusions • Unusual reactions to drugs I Impulsivity: • Self-regulation difficulties (e.g., eating disorders; drug/alcohol/ prescription abuse; money management difficulties such as bankruptcies,

credit card difficulties, or uncontrolled gambling; promiscuity; mood regulation difficulties; chronic pain syndromes) • Self-destructive behaviors (e.g., selfmutilation such as hitting, cutting, burning, or biting oneself; suicide attempts; abusive relationships; highrisk hobbies such as parachuting or racing cars; high-risk behaviors such as frequenting dangerous bars or jogging in parks at night) S Social adaptation: superficially intact social veneer; if the individual demonstrates high academic or professional performance, it is usually inconsistent and erratic.


222


BOX 13.2 I Interpersonal relationships: chaotic and unsatisfying; social relationships tend to be very superficial and transient while personal relationships tend to be extremely intense, manipulative and dependent; intense fears of being alone; rage with the primary caretaker.

(cont’d) A Affect: chronically dysphoric and/or labile; since adolescence, the majority of the mood experience (>80%) has been dysphoric or volatile with the predominant affects being anxiety, anger, depression, and/or emptiness. (Kolb & Gunderson, 1980)

dysphoric affect). For quick screening, Impulsivity and Affect seem to provide diagnostically high yields, probably because these two features are both relatively stable over time (McGlashan et al., 2005); if suggestive, the remainder of the interview is then undertaken. Self-report screening measures. When evaluating a psychiatric phenomenon that has a high frequency in a given clinical population, a screening measure may be particularly useful. These measures function as the impetus for a more detailed clinical evaluation for BPD. Current recommendations include one of the three following self-report measures: (i) the borderline personality scale of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4; Hyler, 1994); (ii) the Self-Harm Inventory (SHI; Sansone, Wiederman & Sansone, 1998); or the (iii) McLean Screening Inventory for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD; Zanarini et al., 2003). We have used all three measures and found them to be dependable, but overinclusive (i.e., they tend to over-diagnose patients as borderline). Therefore, these are truly only screening tools. The PDQ-4 and the SHI are shown in Appendices A and B. For the PDQ-4, a score of 5 or higher is suggestive of BPD (all endorsements count as 1 point, with the last item counted as 1 point if two sub-items are endorsed). For the SHI, which demonstrates a diagnostic accuracy of 84% in comparison with the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (Kolb & Gunderson, 1980), a score of 5 or higher is suggestive of BPD (endorsement of 5 “yes” responses). Other assessments for BPD. There are a number of other assessments for BPD, including the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III; Millon, Davis & Millon, 1997), which has among other scales a BPD scale. This measure for BPD and others are discussed in detail elsewhere (see Sansone & Sansone, 2007a).

IMPLICATIONS OF THE BPD DIAGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH EATING DISORDERS BPD May be a Risk Factor for the Development of an Eating Disorder Curiously, the presence of BPD may be a pre-existing risk factor for the development of an ED (Sansone & Sansone, 2007b). This potential pathway begins with childhood trauma


TREATMENT APPROACHES TO BPD

223

(particularly physical, emotional, and sexual abuses), which facilitates the development of BPD. The development of BPD then results in the emergence of two key psychopathological features: (i) trauma-related disturbances in body image; and (ii) self-harm behavior. Body image disturbances then contribute to the need to “repair” one’s body, a process that initially emerges in adolescence. In the presence of an actual or perceived weight disorder, efforts at body repair subsequently manifest as attempts to lose weight with attendant eating pathology. In the aftermath of the development of eating pathology, the emergence of harmful ED behaviors then complements the BPD dynamics of self-harm and self-soothing. Thus, the presence of BPD appears to heighten the risk for the emergence of an ED, particularly in the context of a weight-conscious family and/or society. Once established, BPD seems to perpetuate its own psychopathology through ED symptoms (see below).

Eating Disorder Pathology May Function as a Self-Injury Equivalent While ED behaviors in the non-BPD patient relate predominantly to food, body, and weight issues, they tend to function as self-injury equivalents in the patient with BPD. For example, excessive exercise may not be only for weight management, but also to induce self-injury.

Comorbid BPD Requires Augmented and Lengthier Treatment In order to produce a positive treatment outcome in the comorbid patient, the clinician will need to augment the standard ED treatment with interventions designed for BPD (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b, p. 2). Indeed, in most cases, the lengthier BPD treatment will take precedence over the ED treatment, which tends to play a secondary but important focus. In other words, ED treatment (e.g., psycho-education, cognitive-behavioral interventions) is clearly attended to, but the psychotherapy emphasis is consistently on BPD. An exception to the preceding guideline is the low-weight, cognitively impaired patient. In such cases, treatment for weight restoration is given priority because these starved patients cannot effectively engage in sophisticated psychotherapy treatment.

Symptoms Are Worse/Outcome Less Robust in Comorbid Patients In ED patients with comorbid BPD, overall psychiatric symptoms tend to be worse, but not necessarily ED symptoms. Yet, some studies indicate less favorable outcomes in the comorbid patient compared to those with ED symptoms only (Masjuan, Aranda & Raich, 2003; Steinhausen, 2002). However, these findings generally refer to continuing broad-spectrum psychiatric symptoms such as impulsivity and self-harm behavior and not to specific ED symptoms (Steiger & Stotland, 1996). The ED symptoms, themselves, may undergo a reasonable resolution (Grilo et al., 2003).

TREATMENT APPROACHES TO BPD According to the Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2001), “the primary treatment for borderline


224


personality disorder is psychotherapy.” (p. 4). There are a number of different psychotherapy approaches to BPD and, at present, there appears to be no evidence that one treatment is superior to another (Livesley, 2005).

Systematized Treatment Approaches De Groot, Verheul & Wim Trijsburg (2008) reviewed a number of systematized treatment approaches (i.e., formalized, structured, and/or manual-based approaches) for BPD, including schema-focused therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, cognitive analytic therapy, systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving, transference focused psychotherapy, mentalization-based treatment, and interpersonal reconstructive therapy. In their review, de Groot and colleagues (2008) point out a number of similarities between these various approaches. According to de Groot et al. (2008), the majority of systematized approaches takes place in outpatient treatment settings and continues for at least one year, with one or two sessions per week. All of these treatment approaches incorporate individual sessions with the exception of systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving, which is undertaken entirely in group format. (Many of the remaining treatment approaches utilize group sessions, as well.) In addition, the majority of these approaches incorporate treatment contracts as well as one primary therapist for the patient. In terms of treatment modalities, all of the preceding systematized approaches include psycho-educational and motivational techniques. In their discussion, de Groot et al. (2008) described psycho-education as any experiential component with an educational goal. The content of these psycho-educational modules typically relates to causal and maintenance factors for BPD as well as the theory underlying the treatment model. As for motivational techniques, these are described as any intervention that focuses on increasing a patient’s commitment to treatment and may include but are not limited to motivational interviewing, clarification of interventions, and paradoxical interventions. In addition to psycho-educational and motivation techniques, all of the preceding systematized treatments incorporate cognitive and interpersonal techniques. Cognitive techniques refer to any intervention that focuses on analyzing and creating insight with regard to patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving. These patterns are then examined in the context of everyday functioning. Interpersonal techniques may be defined as any intervention that improves patients‘ understanding of their patterns of functioning in relationships with other people. The majority of these systematized treatments also contain a psychodynamic component. Commonly used in psychoanalytic and psychodynamic treatments, these components address the patient’s defenses as well as transference phenomena. Finally, some of the preceding systematized approaches incorporate pure behavioral techniques as well as patient training in mindfulness (see McCallum, Chapter 23). Behavioral techniques refer to those procedures that are based on learning theory. Mindfulness, a Buddhist concept, focuses on heightening non-judgmental observation and awareness. In conclusion, while these various systematized approaches appear somewhat structurally different at the outset, they share a variety of core psychotherapeutic strategies. This menu of treatment options suggests that one approach is not more effective than another. However,


ECLECTIC TREATMENT APPROACHES: A BRIEF EXAMPLE

225

this does not exclude the possibility that one technique may be better suited than another to a specific patient.

ECLECTIC TREATMENT APPROACHES: A BRIEF EXAMPLE The preceding systematized approaches do not exclude the use of eclectic treatments, including our own, which is described in detail elsewhere (Sansone & Sansone, 2006a). The following is a brief overview of our eclectic strategy, consisting of overlapping stages of treatment. However, it is difficult to fully describe a treatment approach in the absence of actual patient supervision. Stage 1: Treatment entry. In the initial stage of our treatment approach, the therapist establishes a regular and reliable treatment environment. Key elements entail established and consistent office staff, location and billing procedures, stable furniture/dećor, and predictable appointment times. Irregularities in the preceding office themes tend to generate mistrust and instability in patients with BPD, and may transiently derail the therapeutic relationship. Following the development of a structured treatment environment, the therapist initiates an assessment of the patient and determines a treatment strategy. In the preceding section, we emphasized the importance of accurately diagnosing BPD, which can be effectively accomplished through the use of DSM criteria or the Gunderson criteria (P-I-S-I-A) (see Box 13.1). Using either, it is important for the therapist to simultaneously assess the patient’s functional level, which is a clinical determination. Mid-to-high functioning patients are ideal candidates for our eclectic approach. However, low-functioning patients may be limited to supportive/maintenance treatmentda strategy that emphasizes the acquisition of basic life skills (e.g., fundamental social skills, job training, life management skills). A common pitfall in treatment determination is to direct a low functioning patient into a sophisticated psychotherapy treatment, which tends to promote regression in the patient. For those patients who are candidates for an eclectic psychotherapy approach, we recommend a treatment-entry contract. This contract is designed, at the outset, to contain lifethreatening regressive behavior during the psychotherapy treatment. All psychotherapy treatments tend to foster some level of regression in the patient. For patients who are seriously self-destructive, this normal regressive pattern could culminate in a serious suicide attempt. Therefore, the treatment-entry contract consists of the patient agreeing to absolutely contain high-lethal behavior in an effort to enable the psychotherapy treatment to continue. If the patient is unable to maintain this contract, they need to be diverted to a lower-risk treatment such as supportive/maintenance treatment and/or medication management. The therapist may also elect additional contracting around other behaviors that could potentially disturb or impair the unfolding psychotherapy treatment. An example would be the proscription of substance intoxication during sessions. These adjunctive issues are highly individualized to the specific patient and may relate to some degree to the therapist’s tolerance. In addition to developing a consistent treatment environment, undertaking a reliable assessment for BPD, and establishing a treatment entry contract, we explain to the patient the intense relationship focus of the treatment. In this discussion, we emphasize the importance of the therapeutic relationship, boundaries (e.g., boundary experiences in prior


226


relationships, boundaries in the therapeutic relationship, boundaries outside the therapeutic relationship), the importance of a good patient/therapist fit, the necessity of honesty, and the future management of potential patient-therapist conflicts. Stage 2: The development of a working treatment relationship. During the initial phase of psychotherapy work, the therapist is entangled in a variety of tasks. These include building and sustaining a reliable and consistent therapeutic relationship, grooming healthier coping skills in the patient so as to replace longstanding self-harm behaviors, providing psycho-education, and evaluating for medication management. During this phase of treatment, we typically incorporate psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, and interpersonal techniques. These integrated techniques are described elsewhere (see Sansone & Sansone, 2006a). Stage 3: Working at a deeper level with psychodynamic themes. During the third phase of treatment, deeper psychodynamic themes are tackled, including interpersonal/intrapsychic splitting as well as core self-regulation difficulties. The therapist also enhances the patient’s interpersonal style of relating. In comparison, while Stage 2 is highly structured, Stage 3 tends to be more fluid and psychodynamic. Stage 4: Treatment termination. Termination is a distinct treatment phase and is generally begun six months or more ahead of the anticipated and established end date. In other words, the termination period, itself, lasts at least several months. This duration of termination is necessary because closure of the treatment tends to result in the patient’s re-experiencing of loss and abandonment. As a result, this phase provides a unique opportunity to reframe the context of loss and abandonment. Again, the details of this phase of treatment are discussed elsewhere (see Sansone & Sansone, 2006a).

Potential Treatment Quagmires A number of potential treatment quagmires in working with patients with BPD warrant brief review. The first, as previously mentioned, is directing a low-functioning patient into a demanding psychotherapy treatment. This not only heightens the risk of patient regression, but also misuses the skills of highly trained therapists, who are relegated to staving off regressions and “putting out fires.” A second potential quagmire is assuming that all patients with BPD are candidates for therapy. A small number of such patients are high-risk in any treatment context. Signs of such patients include past intense and negative transferences with therapists, high levels of self-destructive impulsivity, intense reactivity to limits, pervasive anger, and a strong need to “win at any costs.” In our experience, these patients solely engage in treatment to misuse the therapy as well as to engage in abusive and sadomasochistic interactions with the therapist. On rare occasion, these patients may intentfully suicide to “beat the therapist.” Unfortunately, these types of patients are not candidly discussed in the BPD literature. It is essential to recognize that not all patients with BPD can benefit from treatment. A third potential quagmire is whether to confront childhood perpetrators. Potential risks of confrontation include the revictimization of the patient through re-exposure to the perpetrator, patient retraumatization through discrediting responses from the perpetrator, the inability of the patient to contain overwhelming emotions in the aftermath of a confrontation with a resulting escalation of self-harm behavior, and/or potential damage to the therapeutic


CONCLUSIONS

227

relationship in the presence of a negative outcome. An active discussion with the patient of these preceding risks is essential. Patients who are seeking or have already achieved disability are another potential treatment quagmire. In our experience, disability unintentionally but consistently seems to impair attempts at genuine functional recovery by keeping patients unemployed. Yet, employment is a key means of providing life structure. Because employment is not achievable for the disabled patient, full stabilization is not likely to occur. A fifth potential quagmire is comorbid substance abuse, which typically is a substantial deterrent to successful treatment (see Baker Dennis & Helfman, Chapter 14). We typically recommend that such candidates enter into substance-abuse treatment programs and maintain sobriety for a minimum of six months before entering into a demanding psychotherapy treatment. A sixth quagmire is the potential misperception of the role and effect of medication in BPD patients. While all classes of psychotropic drugs have been explored in their treatment, most have resulted in somewhat modest and unsustained effects (see Sansone & Sansone, 2006b). Overall, the most effective medications have been low-dose antipsychotics, although in specific cases, other types of medication (e.g., antidepressants, anticonvulsants) may be temporarily useful. A reasonable response to medication is a 30% reduction in symptoms (Sansone & Sansone, 2006b). These BPD guidelines are not meant to deflect from the general beneficial effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of BN (American Psychiatric Association, 2006, p. 32). In addition, while antipsychotics such as olanzapine have been showing some promise in low-weight patients, their use for BPD symptoms in this debilitated population has undergone very little exploration. A final quagmire is the undertaking of a BPD treatment without any pre-determined approach. This not only facilitates patient regression but may also result in unproductive therapy hours (e.g., excessive focus on the early history) and frustration in both the patient and the therapist. Clinical experience and research have clearly demonstrated that consistency and structure are the bedrock elements of an effective BPD treatment.

OUTCOME As we mentioned previously, treatment of the ED patient with comorbid BPD tends to result in an overall improvement in the eating pathology (Grilo et al., 2003). However, compared with non-comorbid patients, patients with BPD are likely to experience higher levels of continuing psychopathology related to non-ED symptomatology (Steiger & Stotland, 1996).

CONCLUSIONS Patients with comorbid ED and BPD are fairly prevalent. We believe that an accurate diagnosis of BPD is essential to treatment. Patients with these comorbid disorders require treatment augmentation with a lengthier, highly consistent, and structured psychotherapy


228


approach, whether systematized or eclectic in nature. With effective treatment, ED symptoms tend to diminish, although there may be lingering symptoms in other functional areas. These patients are truly challenging to treat but can make genuine and effective gainsdgiven a well executed treatment opportunity.

References Allen, D. M., Abramson, H., Whitson, S., Al-Taher, M., Morgan, S., Veneracion-Yumul, A., .Mason, M. (2005). Perceptions of contradictory communication from parental figures by adults with borderline personality disorder: A preliminary study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 340e352. Allen, D. M., & Farmer, R. G. (1996). Family relationships of adults with borderline personality disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37, 43e51. American Psychiatric Association (2000a). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association (2000b). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association (2001). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, S1e52. American Psychiatric Association (2006). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bandelow, B., Krause, J., Wedekind, D., Broocks, A., Hajak, G., & Ruther, E. (2005). Early traumatic life events, parental attitudes, family history, and birth risk factors in patients with borderline personality disorder and healthy controls. Psychiatry Research, 134, 169e179. De Groot, E. R., Verheul, R., & Wim Trijsburg, R. (2008). An integrative perspective on psychotherapeutic treatments for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22, 332e352. Distel, M. A., Trull, T. J., Derom, C. A., Thiery, E. W., Grimmer, M. A., Martin, N. G.,.Boomsma, D. I. (2008). Heritability of borderline personality disorder features is similar across three countries. Psychological Medicine, 38, 1219e1229. Ellison, J. M., & Shader, R. I. (2003). Pharmacologic treatment of personality disorders: A dimensional approach. In R. I. Shader (Ed.), Manual of psychiatric therapeutics (pp. 169e183). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. Fruzzetti, A. E., Shenk, C., & Hoffman, P. D. (2005). Family interaction and the development of borderline personality disorder: A transactional model. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 1007e1030. Gagnon, P. (1993). Role of the family in the development of borderline personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 611e616. Goodman, M., New, A., & Siever, L. (2004). Trauma, genes, and the neurobiology of personality disorders. In R. Yehuda, & B. McEwen (Eds.), Biobehavioral stress response: Protective and damaging effects (pp. 104e116). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences. Grant, B. R., Chou, S. P., Goldstein, R. B., Huang, B., Stinson, F. S., Saha, T. D., .Ruan, W. J. (2008). Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: Results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69, 533e545. Grilo, C. M., Sanislow, C. A., Shea, M. T., Skodol, A. E., Stout, R. L., Pagano, M. E., .McGlashan, T. H. (2003). The natural course of bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified is not influenced by personality disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34, 319e330. Gross, R., Olfson, M., Gameroff, M., Shea, S., Feder, A., Fuentes, M., .Weissman, M. M. (2002). Borderline personality in primary care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 53e60. Gunderson, J. G., & Lyoo, I. K. (1997). Family problems and relationships for adults with borderline personality disorder. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 4, 272e278. Guttman, H. A., & Laporte, L. (2000). Empathy in families of women with borderline personality disorder, anorexia nervosa, and a control group. Family Process, 39, 345e358. Hayashi, N., Suzuki, R., & Yamamoto, N. (1995). Parental perceptions of borderline personality disorders in videorecorded interviews. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 49, 35e37. Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality Diagnostic Questionniared4. New York, NY: New York Psychiatric Institute.


CONCLUSIONS

229

Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Chen, H., Kasen, S., & Brook, J. S. (2006). Parenting behaviors associated with risk for offspring personality disorder during childhood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 579e587. Kolb, J. E., & Gunderson, J. G. (1980). Diagnosing borderline patients with a semi-structured interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 37e41. Livesley, W. J. (2005). Principles and strategies for treating personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 442e450. Masjuan, M. G., Aranda, F. F., & Raich, R. M. (2003). Bulimia nervosa and personality disorders: A review of the literature. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3, 335e349. McGlashan, T. H., Grilo, C. M., Sanislow, C. A., Ralevski, E., Morey, L. C., Gunderson, J. G., . Pagano, M. (2005). Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: Toward a hybrid model of Axis II disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 883e889. Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). Manual for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc. Norden, K. A., Klein, D. N., Donaldson, S. K., Pepper, C. M., & Klein, L. M. (1995). Reports of the early home environment in DSM-III-R personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 9, 213e223. Paris, J. (2005). The development of impulsivity and suicidality in borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 1091e1104. Parker, G., Roy, K., Wilhelm, K., Mitchell, P., Austin, M.-P., & Hadzic-Pavlovic, D. (1999). An exploration of links between early parenting experiences and personality disorder type and disordered personality functioning. Journal of Personal Disorders, 13, 361e374. Quigley, B. D. (2005). Diagnostic relapse in borderline personality: Risk and protective factors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 3721B. Sansone, R. A., Levitt, J. L., & Sansone, L. A. (2005). The prevalence of personality disorders among those with eating disorders. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 13, 7e21. Sansone, R. A., Rytwinski, D., & Gaither, G. A. (2003). Borderline personality and psychotropic medication prescription in an outpatient psychiatry clinic. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44, 454e458. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2000). Borderline personality disorder: The enigma. Primary Care Reports, 6, 219e226. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2006a). Borderline personality and eating disorders: An eclectic approach to treatment. In R. A. Sansone, & J. L. Levitt (Eds.), Personality disorders and eating disorders. Exploring the frontier (pp. 197e212). New York, NY: Routledge. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2006b). The use of psychotropic medications in patients with eating disorders and personality disorders. In R. A. Sansone, & J. L. Levitt (Eds.), Personality disorders and eating disorders. Exploring the frontier (pp. 231e244). New York, NY: Routledge. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2007a). Borderline personality: A psychiatric overview. In R. Sansone, & L. Sansone (Eds.), Borderline personality disorder in the medical setting: Unmasking and managing the difficult patient (pp. 3e36). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2007b). Childhood trauma, borderline personality, and eating disorders: A developmental cascade. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 15, 333e346. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2009). The families of borderline patients: The psychological environment revisited. Psychiatry, 6, 19e24. Sansone, R. A., Schumacher, D., Wiederman, M. W., & Routsong-Weichers, L. (2008). The prevalence of binge eating disorder and borderline personality symptomatology among gastric surgery patients. Eating Behaviors, 9, 197e202. Sansone, R. A., Songer, D. A., & Gaither, G. A. (2001). Diagnostic approaches to borderline personality and their relationship to self-harm behavior. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 5, 273e277. Sansone, R. A., Wiederman, M. W., & Sansone, L. A. (1998). The Self-Harm Inventory (SHI): Development of a scale for identifying self-destructive behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 973e983. Sansone, R. A., Wiederman, M. W., & Sansone, L. A. (2000). Medically self-harming behavior and its relationship to borderline personality symptoms and somatic preoccupation among internal medicine patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 188, 45e47.


230


Skodol, A. E., Siever, L. J., Livesley, W. J., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., & Widiger, T. A. (2002). The borderline diagnosis II: Biology, genetics, and clinical course. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 951e963. Steiger, H., & Stotland, S. (1996). Prospective study of outcome in bulimics as a function of Axis-II comorbidity: Long-term responses on eating and psychiatric symptoms. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 149e161. Steinhausen, H.-C. (2002). The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1284e1293. Stone, M. H. (1986). Borderline personality disorder. In R. Michels, & J. O. Cavenar (Eds.), Psychiatry (2nd ed., pp. 1e15). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott. Torgersen, S., & Alnaes, R. (1992). Differential perception of parental bonding in schizotypal and borderline personality disorder patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33, 34e38. Vitousek, K. M., & Stumpf, R. S. (2006). Difficulties in the assessment of personality traits and disorders in individuals with eating disorders. In R. A. Sansone, & J. L. Levitt (Eds.), Personality disorders and eating disorders (pp. 91e117). New York, NY: Routledge. Weaver, T. L., & Clum, G. A. (1993). Early family environments and traumatic experiences associated with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 1068e1075. White, C. N., Gunderson, J. G., Zanarini, M. C., & Hudson, J. I. (2003). Family studies of borderline personality disorder: A review. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 11, 8e19. Yatsko, C. K. (1996). Etiological theories of borderline personality disorder: A comparative multivariate study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 4628B. Zanarini, M. C., Dubo, E. D., Lewis, R. E., & Williams, A. A. (1997). Childhood factors associated with the development of borderline personality disorder. In M. C. Zanarini (Ed.), Role of sexual abuse in the etiology of borderline personality disorder (pp. 29e44). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. Zanarini, M. C., & Frankenburg, F. R. (1997). Pathways to the development of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 93e104. Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., Marino, M. F., Lewis, R. E., Williams, A. A., & Khera, G. S. (2000). Biparental failure in the childhood experiences of borderline patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 264e273. Zanarini, M. C., Gunderson, J. G., Marino, M. F., Schwartz, E. O., & Frankenburg, F. R. (1989). Childhood experiences of borderline patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 30, 18e25. Zanarini, M. C., Vujanovic, A. A., Parachini, E. A., Boulanger, J. L., Frankenburg, F. R., & Hennen, J. (2003). A screening measure for BPD: The McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD). Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 568e573. Zweig-Frank, H., & Paris, J. (1991). Parents‘ emotional neglect and overprotection according to recollections of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 648e651.

APPENDIX A The Borderline Personality Scale of the Personality Diagnostic Questionaired4 (Hyler, 1994)* Instructions: The purpose of this questionnaire is for you to describe the kind of person you are. When answering the questions, think about how you have tended to feel, think, and act over the past several years. To remind you of this, you will find the statement, “Over the past several years.” T (True) means that the statement is generally true for you. F (False) means that the statement is generally false for you. Even if you are not entirely sure about the answer, indicate “T” or “F” (circle one) for every question. There are no correct answers. You may take as much time as you wish.


APPENDIX B

231

Over the past several years T T T T T T T T T

F F F F F F F F F

I’ll go to extremes to prevent those who I love from ever leaving me. I either love someone or hate them, with nothing in between. I often wonder who I really am. I have tried to hurt or kill myself. I am a very moody person. I feel that my life is dull and meaningless. I have difficulty controlling my anger or temper. When stressed, things happen. Like I get paranoid or just “black out.” I have done things on impulse (such as those below) that can get me into trouble. Check all that apply to you: ___Spending more money than I have ___Having sex with people I hardly know ___Drinking too much ___Taking drugs ___Eating binges ___Reckless driving *Reprinted with permission from Dr. Hyler; these items are included in: Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (fourth edition; PDQ-4). New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York. Dr. Hyler is located at New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032.

APPENDIX B The Self-Harm Inventory (Sansone, Wiederman, & Sansone, 1998) Instructions: Please answer the following questions by checking either, “Yes,” or “No.” Check “yes” only to those items that you have done intentionally, or on purpose, to hurt yourself. Yes ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

No ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Have you ever intentionally, or on purpose. 1. Overdosed? (If yes, number of times_____) 2. Cut yourself on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____) 3. Burned yourself on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____) 4. Hit yourself? (If yes, number of times_____) 5. Banged your head on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____) 6. Abused alcohol? 7. Driven recklessly on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____) 8. Scratched yourself on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____)


232


___ ___

___ ___

___

___

___ ___ ___ ___

___ ___ ___ ___

___

___

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

9. Prevented wounds from healing? 10. Made medical situations worse, on purpose (e.g., skipped medication)? 11. Been promiscuous (i.e., had many sexual partners)? (If yes, how many?_____) 12. Set yourself up in a relationship to be rejected? 13. Abused prescription medication? 14. Distanced yourself from God as punishment? 15. Engaged in emotionally abusive relationships? (If yes, number of relationships?_____) 16. Engaged in sexually abusive relationships? (If yes, number of relationships?_____) 17. Lost a job on purpose? (If yes, number of times_____) 18. Attempted suicide? (If yes, number of times_____) 19. Exercised an injury on purpose? 20. Tortured yourself with self-defeating thoughts? 21. Starved yourself to hurt yourself? 22. Abused laxatives to hurt yourself? (If yes, number of times_____)

Have you engaged in any other self-destructive behaviors not asked about in this inventory? If so, please describe below. Ó 1995: Sansone, Sansone, & Wiederman


C H A P T E R

14 Managing the Eating Disorder Patient with a Comorbid Substance Use Disorder Amy Baker Dennis and Bethany L. Helfman The relationship between eating disorders and substance use disorders (including substance use, abuse, and dependence) is a complex and often deadly one. These disorders have the highest mortality rates across all mental health diagnoses. Harris & Barraclough (1997) performed a meta-analysis of 249 reports of mortality in those with mental disorders and found that anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) patients had rates of suicide that were higher than for all other psychiatric disorders and 23 times that of the general population. Among alcohol dependent women, the risk of suicide is 20 times greater than is found in the general population (Kessler, Borges & Walters, 1999). Among all eating disorders (ED), the binge purge subtype of anorexia nervosa (ANBP) is associated with the highest risk of death (Bulik et al., 2008). When ED and substance use disorders (SUD) co-occur, the risk of mortality may increase exponentially. In a study of roughly 6,000 women, Swedish researchers found that AN subjects were 19 times more likely than the general population to have died from psychoactive substance abuse (SA), primarily alcohol abuse (Papadopoulos, Ekbom, Brandy & Eskelius, 2009). Clearly, ED and SUD are independently correlated with higher than expected rates of death. It is therefore surprising to note that despite significant comorbidity, historically, ED professionals have not integrated SA treatment into their paradigms, nor have SA professionals adequately incorporated ED treatment into their practices. Complicating matters is the fact that many randomized controlled treatment trials conducted in the ED field exclude subjects with SUDs from their studies (Gadalla & Piran, 2007). Currently, there are no empirically supported treatments for this comorbid population. Within the ED community there is also a tendency to eschew the treatment of a patient’s SUD. Instead of attempting to integrate treatment for both the ED and SUD, clinicians often refer the patient to a SUD program or specialist either prior to initiating ED treatment or concurrently. Unfortunately, many clinicians in both the ED and SUD fields are antagonistic toward the approaches of the other field. It is all too common for clinicians to simplify these


233


234

14. MANAGING THE EATING DISORDER PATIENT WITH A COMORBID SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER

cases by focusing merely on one aspect (their specialty) of the patient’s presentation. Regrettably, focusing on a part of the whole can prolong a patient’s suffering. Treating one disorder without the other is akin to trying to ameliorate a fever without treating the underlying infection. This chapter explores the science/practice gaps both between and within the ED and SUD fields. What is currently known, and what areas require further research, will be highlighted. The utility of developing an integrated, individualized approach for the ED/SUD patient that incorporates evidence-based therapies (EBT) and clinical expertise from both specialties will be reviewed in an effort to improve treatment delivery and outcome. Stimulating dialogue, cross-training, and joint research efforts between the ED and SUD communities is vital. Clinicians in both fields must acquire and incorporate knowledge of the other for advancements in treatment approaches to occur.

PREVALENCE DATA Substance Use Disorders Based on DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) criteria, 3.2 million Americans abuse or are dependent on alcohol or illicit drugs. There is a widely held notion that males abuse substances at rates greater than for females. Although this is true in adults, data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009) revealed that among adolescents ages 12 to 17, substance abuse rates were slightly lower among males than females (7.0 vs. 8.2%, respectively). While the rate of alcohol abuse has been relatively stable, an alarming increase in the abuse of prescription drugs including Ritalin, Valium and OxyContin has occurred. These drugs are now the fourth most abused substances in America (behind marijuana, alcohol, and tobacco) with an 81% increase from 1992 to 2003 (Califano, 2007). In fact, Americans are consuming roughly 80% of the global supply of opioids, 99% of the global supply of hydrocodone, and two-thirds of the world’s illegal drugs despite representing merely 4% of the world’s population (Kuehn, 2007; Manchikani, 2006).

Co-occurring Substance Use Disorders and Eating Disorders Prevalence data suggest that roughly 50% of individuals with an ED are also abusing drugs and/or alcohol, which is more than five times the abuse rates seen in the general population (The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, 2003). Two meta-analyses, conducted a decade apart, examined the co-occurrence of EDs and SUDs. Holderness, BrooksGunn & Warren (1994), found a strong association between SUD and ANBP as well as BN, but no association between SUD and AN restrictor subtype (ANR). Familial rates of alcoholism in those with BN was 40% (Hudson, Pope, Jonas & Yurgelun-Todd, 1983) and roughly 19% of those with BN had family members with a SUD (Bulik, 1987; Kassett et al., 1989). The second meta-analysis (Gadalla & Piran, 2007) reviewed studies of the co-occurrence of ED and alcohol use disorders (AUD) in women, and included community, clinical, and school-based samples. This study supported previous findings suggesting no association


THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EATING DISORDERS AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE

235

between AUD and ANR but a strong association between AUD in women with ANBP, BN, binge eating disorder (BED), and Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS). More specifically, the lowest rates of alcohol use were seen in restricting anorexics (0e34%). Those with ANBP, had rates of alcohol use that followed the general population (20e45%) but their rates of abuse and dependence were much higher (12e39% vs. 3e6%) than those seen in the general population. Not only do high rates of SUD exist among women with ED, women with SUD have high rates of disordered eating (Schuckit et al., 1996). In particular, 30e40% of women with AUD (Taylor, Peveler & Hibbert, 1993) and 16.3% of women with SUD (Blinder, Blinder & Samantha, 1998) report a history of an ED as compared to roughly 3.5% of women found in the general population (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope & Kessler, 2007).

THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EATING DISORDERS AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE The comorbidity of ED and SUD yields a complex clinical picture that requires a thorough understanding of both conditions. A common misconception around the use and abuse of substances in restricting anorexics involves the assumption that these patients would avoid drinking alcohol not only because of the “empty calories,” but the fear that intoxication might lead to “loss of control.” However, animal researchers have repeatedly found that food deprivation in rats and Rhesus monkeys leads to increased self-administration of cocaine, nicotine, amphetamines, alcohol, barbiturates, phencyclidine, and opioids (Carroll, France & Meisch, 1979). Logically, it is easy to accept that alcohol use would increase during starvation (e.g., caloric replacement), but these studies demonstrated increased self-administration of virtually any drug. Furthermore, in a multicenter study exploring SUD in AN women, Root and colleagues (2010) found that 25.9% of their sample reported lifetime drug use and 19.8% met criteria for lifetime history of AUD. Rates of use were highest among the purging AN group while the ANBN group had the highest percentage of drug abuse and dependence. Despite the fact that restricting anorexics demonstrated the lowest use among the AN subtypes, it is interesting to note that restricting anorexics were found to abuse substances, most frequently marijuana and hallucinogens. Moreover, it is widely accepted that ED diagnostic categories are fluid and exist on a continuum (Fairburn, 2008). Many BN patients report a prior history of AN. In fact, up to 50% of AN patients will develop bulimic symptoms sometime during the course of their illness (Fairburn, 2008). It is not uncommon for individuals to move between diagnositic categories during the lifetime of their ED. Clearly, the assumption that restricting anorexics do not, or will not, develop a SUD is erroneous. Another important issue to consider is that SUD can develop before, during, or after treatment for an ED. In a study conducted by Bulik, Sullivan, Joyce & Carter (1997), 28% of participants became alcohol dependent before the onset of their BN, 38% developed their BN and alcohol dependence at the same age, and 34% developed an alcohol problem after the onset of their BN. Clinicians should also remember that when treating adolescent or young adult ED patients, they are nowhere near passing through the “age of risk” for the development of


236


SUD. In fact, rates of SUD rise in older patients (Kessler et al., 2005), with one study finding 50% of BN patients diagnosed with alcoholism by age 35 (Beary, Lacey & Merry, 1986). Finally, in a 10-year prospective follow-up study of 95 AN patients, Strober, Freeman, Bower & Kigali (1995) found that adolescents who did not have a pre-existing diagnosis of a SUD at intake frequently developed one after discharge. By completion of the follow-up study, 50% of the ANBP patients and 12% of ANR patients had developed a new comorbid SUD. In summary, there is a high co-occurrence of SUD in all ED subgroups. Clinicians should screen every ED patient at intake for SUD, not just those that engage in binge eating and/or purging. SUD can develop at any time so patients should be monitored throughout the course of treatment.

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EATING DISORDERS AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS Numerous authors have outlined the similarities between ED and SUD (Bemis, 1985; Butterfield & LeClair, 1988). Some support the notion that ED (particularly BN, ANBP, and BED) and SUD have a shared or causal etiology (Avena, 2007; Brisman & Siegel, 1984; Marrazzi & Luby, 1986), while others challenge the notion that EDs are a variant of an “addictive disorder” (Fairburn, 1995; Wilson, 1993).

Similarities ED and SUD are often long-term illnesses fraught with repeated unsuccessful attempts to recover and frequent relapses. Both disorders are potentially life-threatening illnesses that, when left untreated, have high mortality rates. Individuals with SUD or ED tend to deny the severity of their problem. Substance abusers often underreport the frequency of use and quantities consumed just as those with AN deny restricting and low weight even in the face of malnutrition and emaciation. It is common for individuals with AN to exaggerate the amount of food consumed, minimize their exercise routines, or augment their weight through devious means. Negative physical, social, and psychological consequences associated with SUDs or EDs are often minimized or denied. Like substance abusers, individuals with AN rarely independently seek medical or psychological intervention. Most patients are referred by a concerned coach, school counselor, or doctor, or brought into treatment by a family member or friend. Just as substance abusers crave drugs/alcohol, ED individuals (particularly BED and BN patients) describe intense food cravings and uncontrollable compulsive consuming. A preoccupation with the use of the “substance” (i.e., food, drugs, alcohol), is frequently fueled by the desire to re-experience the mood-altering effects associated with engaging in the behaviors. Another similarity between these two disorders is the high prevalence of borderline personality disorder (BPD) found in ED patients (particularly ANBP and BN) and substance abusers (Bulik et al., 1997). Holderness et al. (1994) reported that impulsivity was the key attribute that linked SUD with BN and ANBP. This underlying personality style lends itself to global dysregulation including cognitive dysfunction, problems with affect regulation,


SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EATING DISORDERS AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS

237

and interpersonal difficulties (Dennis & Sansone, 1991, 1997; see also Sansone and Sansone, Chapter 13). A growing body of research suggests the presence of genetic or neurobiological similarities between individuals with SUD and ED (Jonas, 1990). Some suggest that these two disorders may be a different expression of the same “addictive trait” (Wilson, 1991). Neurotransmitters including endogenous opioids, dopamine, serotonin, and neuropeptide Y, appear to play a role in both ED and SUD (Blinder et al., 1998). Finally, it has long been accepted that AUD and SUD are familial, and both have been found to be highly heritable (h2¼0.80) with only 20% of the variability attributed to environmental influences (Hicks, Krueger, Iaconco & Patrick, 2004). Likewise, studies of monozygotic twins found that heritability estimates for AN and BN ranged from 0.54 to 0.80 (Lilenfeld, Kaye & Strober, 1997) and 0.82 for latent binge-eating (Bulik, Sullivan & Kendler, 1998). Family transmission studies have also demonstrated a 3- to 5-fold increased rate of ED in relatives of probands, as compared with relatives of non-ED controls (Strober, Lampert, Morrell, Burroughs & Jacobs, 1990). Additionally, numerous studies have found a higher than chance incidence of first-degree relatives with alcohol and drug problems in ED probands (Kassett et al., 1989; Kaye et al., 1996).

Differences Despite the behavioral and psychological similarities between ED and SUD and their higher than expected co-occurrence rates, there has yet to be convincing evidence that ED are in fact “addictions.” Closer examination of heritability studies suggest no evidence of familial cross-transmission between alcohol dependence and AN or BN (Schuckit et al., 1996). Two other studies have demonstrated that although these two disorders frequently co-occur, they do not share a common transmittable familial vulnerability (Kaye et al., 1996; Kendler et al., 1995). In several ways, ED and SUD are unique disorders that are conceptualized and treated quite differently, both from a psychological and pharmacological perspective. Substancedependence is considered to be a chronic disease that can only be arrested, not cured. This model suggests that the individual is “powerless” over their disease and will never completely recover. Abstinence is the course of action to sustain remission. Physical, emotional, and spiritual health can be achieved through life-long abstinence, continued attendance at AA/NA meetings, and adherence to the 12 steps (Overeaters Anonymous, 1990) and traditions. On the other hand, ED are considered to be curable mental illnesses that require aggressive psychological intervention, medical management, and in some cases, psychotropic medications. Patients must relinquish “over-control” of their eating patterns and moderate food intake (i.e., give up dietary restraint). They are encouraged to repair dysfunctional relationships and replace faulty beliefs and maladaptive coping strategies with effective life management skills. Self-help programs are not considered an essential element for ED recovery and life-long participation is not required to prevent relapse. Some ED programs classify EDs as “addictions” and utilize an abstinence model approach to recovery. The dilemma in applying this doctrine to ED is that food, which has been used to replace the word “alcohol” in Overeaters Anonymous (OA) literature, is necessary for survival and therefore not an appropriate substance for abstinence (Overeaters Anonymous,


238


1990). Furthermore, no compelling human studies suggest that ED recovery can be achieved through abstinence from particular foods (i.e., white flour and sugar) as OA implies. Finally, the diagnostic criteria for addiction, which includes both “tolerance and withdrawal,” do not apply to individuals with ED.

COMMON SUBSTANCES OF ABUSE A comprehensive review of ED and SUD would be incomplete without a discussion of the atypical substances often abused by the ED patient. Inquiry into the use of these substances among ED patients will help identify problem behaviors and inform treatment planning.

Over-the-Counter Medications The availability and use of herbal and Over-The-Counter (OTC) preparations has increased exponentially. From 1990 to 1997, the use of herbal remedies increased by 380%, with approximately 42% of Americans reportedly using some form of these therapies (Eisenberg et al., 1998). Despite this increase, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides no oversight of these preparations, thus leaving issues of safety and efficacy to chance. Along with increased use of these substances has come increased misuse. Laxatives. Of the OTC drugs, laxatives are the most commonly abused substances by ED patients (Mitchell, Specker & Edmonson, 1997). Data from Steffen and colleagues (2007) found that 67% of bulimic subjects reported using laxatives at some point in their ED. A review of 73 studies found that 15% of those with BN abuse laxatives regularly (Neims, McNeill, Giles & Todd, 1995). The importance of these data is underscored by the suggestion that ED patients who abuse laxatives may represent a more pathologically complex subgroup. In particular, laxative abusers tend to be more impulsive across multiple domains, have a history of sexual abuse, and exhibit more personality psychopathology than do nonabusers (Favaro & Santtonastaso, 1998; Johnson, Tobin & Enright, 1989). Eating disorder patients use laxatives in an attempt to lose weight, despite the fact that they are ineffective. Treatment of laxative abuse includes prompt discontinuation of the substance. ED patients often find this intolerable due to the resultant constipation, temporary weight gain, and fluid retention that can occur. Fluid retention may last for some time, prompting patients to use more laxatives as body image distortions are exacerbated. Patients may require more frequent care during this time, as triggers for relapse are generally significant (see also Tyson, Chapter 6 for further information on medical management issues in ED). Diuretics. Diuretics, which reduce water retention by prompting the kidneys to excrete urine, are also widely used in the ED population. Estimates suggest that 3e5% of high-school and college students use diuretics. Lifetime rates among women with BN are as high as 31% (Roerig, Mitchell & Zwaan, 2003). When used according to instructions, OTC diuretics are generally mild and safe. However, ED patients can take several times the amount recommended leading to gastrointestinal upset, nausea, and even vomiting. By contrast, the abuse of prescription diuretics (i.e., furosemide or LasixÒ) can have serious medical consequences including palpitations, hypokalemia, neuropathy, and cardiac conduction defects (Mitchell


COMMON SUBSTANCES OF ABUSE

239

et al., 1997). Diuretics may be stopped abruptly, although fluid retention, edema, and transient weight gain may occur, thus triggering urges to resume abuse. Diet pills. Mitchell, Hatsukami, Eckert & Pyle (1985) found that 42% of ED patients used diet pills to regulate weight. Six years later, these same researchers reported a 12% further increase in diet pill use among BN patients (Mitchell, Pyle & Eckert, 1991). This increase may be due to the proliferation of new products and the ability to order these substances over the Internet. Diet pills generally contain agents that act like amphetamines on the sympathetic nervous system. Some also contain laxatives. Caffeine is commonly found in diet pill preparations and may be labeled as kola nut, guarana seed, or green tea. The daily use of 1,000 mg of caffeine has been linked with restlessness, insomnia, anxiety, tremor, and even tachycardia. With continued use, tolerance builds and when discontinued, withdrawal effects including headaches, nausea, and fatigue can occur. Diet pills may be stopped abruptly with patient education regarding potential withdrawal effects. Syrup of Ipecac. Some ED patients also abuse emetine, which is the active ingredient in Ipecac. The intended use of Ipecac is to promote vomiting in the case of accidental poisoning, although it is no longer recommended for this purpose (American Pediatrics Association, 2003; Silber, Maine & McGilley, 2008). In a study of 851 ED outpatients, 8.8% of patients with BN reported chronic abuse (Greenfield, Mickley, Quinlan & Roloff, 1993). When looking at lifetime use, the percentage of BN patients who use Ipecac rises to 18% (Steffen, Mitchell & Roerig, 2007). Due to the toxicity and lethality of this substance, clinicians are advised to routinely screen for its use. Once detected, Ipecac use should be immediately discontinued and medical management of these patients is strongly encouraged. Orlistat and AlliÒ. Orlistat and AlliÒ are intestinal lipase inhibitors approved for the treatment of obesity. They work by disrupting the absorption of fat in the small intestines. A few case studies have documented Orlistat abuse among patients with ED (Cochrane & Malcolm, 2002; Fernandez-Aranda et al., 2001). In particular, Orlistat has been used to promote purging by BN patients. Orlistat, now sold over-the-counter as AlliÒ at a reduced strength, is readily available, raising concerns of a potential increase in abuse. In addition to inhibiting the digestion of fat, these substances reduce the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins and are not benign.

Prescription Medications and Performance Enhancing Agents Steroids. Approximately 13% of female athletes have a diagnosable ED, and of those athletes, 3.26% use anabolic steroids (Johnson, Powers & Dick, 1999). Abuse often persists to prevent significant withdrawal symptoms including mood swings, depression, fatigue, restlessness, loss of appetite, insomnia, reduced libido, and “cravings” for the drug. Complicating matters, steroid abusers may develop additional drug dependencies in an effort to self-medicate the negative effects of steroid abuse (Cochrane & Malcolm, 2002). Anecdotal reports suggest tapering patients off steroids and treating the symptoms. Patient education regarding the effects of steroid abuse, as well as what to expect as they withdraw from the drug, is essential. During the weaning period, evaluating for the presence of depression and suicidal ideation (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2006), as well as increased body image disturbance, is advised.


240


Insulin. Prevalence rates of diabetes among ED populations have been inconsistent (Jones, Lawson, Daneman, Olmsted & Rodin, 2000). A meta-analysis of diabetes and ED found that BN is more common in female patients with Type I diabetes compared with their nondiabetic peers (Nielsen, 2002). Although it is not known whether diabetes increases a patient’s risk for the development of an ED, what is well known is that the co-occurrence of these disorders can negatively affect the course and treatment of an ED. To avoid weight gain, these patients may underutilize their insulin in an effort to purge unwanted calories. Among adolescent females with Type I diabetes, 45e80% exhibit binge eating behaviors and 12e40% have deliberately induced glycosuria by reducing or omitting insulin dosages to promote weight loss (Jones et al., 2000). If insulin abuse is suspected, clinicians are advised to work closely with the patient’s endocrinologist, who should be considered for inclusion on the patient’s treatment team. RitalinÒ and AdderalÒ. There are significant rates of comorbidity between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and both SUD and ED. Nearly 33% of adults with ADHD have histories of AUD and 20% have a history of SUD (Waid, LaRowe, Anton & Johnson, 2004). In a large study of adolescent girls, Biederman and colleagues (2007) found that those with ADHD were 5.6 times more likely to develop BN and 2.7 times more likely to develop AN than their non-ADHD peers. The abuse of amphetamines appears to be most common among ANBP patients (Root et al., 2010). Ritalin abuse can result in toxicity, with large doses leading to psychosis, seizures, and cardiovascular accidents. In summary, it is imperative that ED clinicians initially and regularly assess for the abuse of alcohol and drugs, including OTC preparations, steroids, stimulants, insulin, and emetics, as SUD may arise at any point in the course of treatment.

TREATMENT It is often difficult to assess the extent of comorbid conditions in those with a SUD. More specifically, SUD can mimic the symptoms of other mental disorders. For example, depression commonly occurs during chronic use or withdrawal from many substances, and stimulant abuse can resemble anxiety or even mania. Without a thorough assessment, including information on the history and chronology of symptoms, it can be difficult to distinguish between disorders. As part of the assessment process, we routinely explore the adaptive function of our patients ED and SUD behaviors. Appreciating the social, psychological, physical, or interpersonal problems that these disorders manage or “solve,” and identifying the secondary gains that result from engaging in these behaviors, can provide the clinician with insight into the precipitants and factors that maintain their patients’ disorder. Understanding the adaptive function of these behaviors can also inform case conceptualization, team constellation, treatment goals, and the selection of appropriate levels of care, therapeutic modalities, and approach.

Empirically Supported Interventions Empirically validated, integrated treatment approaches do not currently exist and no known clinical trials of ED treatment for SUD populations have been conducted. Gaps between what research has identified as efficacious treatment and what is actually done in clinical practice are significant. A 1998 report commissioned by the Institute of Medicine


TREATMENT

241

found a 17-year gap between the publication of research and its actual impact on treatment delivery in clinical settings (Lamb, Greenlick & McCarty, 1998). Moreover, a large discrepancy in funding for research exists where roughly 99% of funds are dedicated to intervention research, with only 1% available for the implementation and dissemination of research results (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman & Wallace, 2005). To compound this problem, research data often get “lost in translation,” ultimately being ineffectively interpreted or delivered in clinical settings. For example, research indicates that addiction is a chronic, relapsing disorder that can be managed, but not cured (McLellan et al., 1997). Yet in clinical practice, addiction is often treated as if it were an acute disorder requiring crisis intervention, and relapse is seen as a failure of treatment. In light of this gap, it is not surprising that few treatment centers undertake the evaluation and treatment of these co-occurring disorders. In fact, a study by Gordon et al. (2008) of 351 publicly funded addiction treatment programs, found that while half of the programs screened for ED, only 29% admitted complex ED cases. Research also suggests that a mere 21.7% of private SA centers offer ED treatment (Roman & Johnson, 2004).

Evidence-Based Therapies This section will focus on EBT for SUD and ED, respectively. It is intended to inform the clinician rather than provide prescriptive treatment recommendations. Patients must be treated as individuals, rather than ascribing to a “one size fits all” viewpoint. Once a thorough assessment has been conducted, the information can be utilized collaboratively with the patient to formulate a treatment plan. Components of an individualized treatment plan consider both the EBT available as well as the specific modes (individual, group, family, medical, psychiatric, and nutritional) and intensity (outpatient, intensive outpatient, day treatment, residential, or inpatient) of treatment needed for a particular individual. Other considerations include the patient’s psychological issues, cognitive style and level of functioning, as well as age, gender, and social support system. Cognitive Behavioral Therapies. Historically, the foundation of SUD treatment has been a 12-step, psychosocial, abstinence model delivered in group and residential settings. However, current emphasis is on the study and utilization of EBT. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is one of the few EBTs that have been found effective in the treatment of both SUD and ED. In the treatment of SUD, CBT interventions focus on enhancing self-esteem and coping skills. Within the ED community, CBT is the treatment of choice for BN and BED (National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004). The focus of CBT with this population is on replacing ED behaviors such as dietary restraint, or binge eating, with normalized eating patterns. At the same time, CBT identifies the patient’s dysfunctional thoughts regarding weight, shape, and appearance and replaces them with more reality-based thinking. Interpersonal Psychotherapy. The use of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) in the treatment of SUD is limited. A clinical trial using IPT with methadone-maintained opiate addicts found significant clinical improvements, but design issues limit the generalizability of this study (Roundville, Glazer, Wilber & Weissman, 1983). Another study using IPT for depression in substance abusing female prisoners suggested that group IPT significantly decreased their depressive symptoms and improved their perceived social support, although the impact on sobriety was mixed (Johnson & Zlotnick, 2000).


242


Contrary to the limited data on IPT for SUD, a fair amount of data suggests that IPT is an efficacious treatment for both BN and BED. According to IPT theory, the resolution of interpersonal difficulties will result in the resolution of disordered eating. Individual IPT was found to be as effective as CBT in the treatment of BN at post-treatment and at 5-year follow-up (Fairburn, 1995). Wilfley and colleagues (2002) compared CBT group therapy to IPT group therapy for overweight individuals with BED. Both treatments were found to have intial and long-term efficacy in reducing ED behaviors and the psychiatric symptoms associated with BED. Motivational Enhancement Therapy. Motivational enhancement therapy (MET) grew out of the need to reduce early attrition rates in SUD treatment (DiClemente & Prochaska, 1998). This model provides a framework for conceptualizing the strength of a patient’s motivation for change. Research suggests that not only are motivational enhancement techniques effective; they are also efficient. Two large, multi-site trials examining treatments for alcoholism demonstrated that 3e4 sessions of MET were comparable in efficacy to 12 sessions of CBT (Project MATCH Research Group, 1997) or 8 sessions of social behavior and network therapy (United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial Research Team, 2005). Motivational enhancement therapy with ED patients is similar in its application to that seen in the SA literature. Geller and Drab (1999) have shown that ED patients’ readiness for change impacts their engagement in treatment, magnitude of behavior change, and relapse risk. Additional studies are needed before METcan be considered an EBT for use with ED patients. Couples and Family Therapy Applications. Behavioral couples and family therapy has been shown to be effective with a SA population (O’Farrell & Fals-Stewart, 2001). This approach recognizes how addiction can have a destructive impact on the family structure (Steinglass, Bennett, Wolin & Reiss, 1987). Therapy begins with a functional analysis of the patient’s SA behavior and an assessment of marital and familial relationships. With regard to the marriage, interventions focus on improving communication, increasing quality time, and developing behavioral change agreements. Behavioral couples and family therapy is currently being studied for use with adult AN couples. Family based treatment and ego-oriented individual therapy are the only two EBTs for adolescent AN (Fitzpatrick, Moye, Hoste, Lock & Le Grange, 2009; Lock, Le Grange, Agras & Dare, 2001; Robin et al., 1999). Both have been found to be effective in restoring weight and eliminating eating disorder psychopathology. Psychopharmacological Interventions. Pharmacological treatments for SUD with FDA approval include disulfiram (AntabuseÒ) for alcohol dependence, methadone for heroin dependency, naltrexone (ReviaÒ) for alcohol and opioid dependence, buprenorphine (SuboxoneÒ) for opiate detoxification and treatment, and acamprosate (CampralÒ) for alcohol dependence (Johnson, Roman, Ducharme & Knudsen, 2005). Other medications that have been used to treat addiction include serotonergic and dopaminergic agents. The neurotransmitter serotonin has been implicated in the modulation of both mood and impulse. Researchers have hypothesized that low levels of serotonin in alcohol-dependent individuals may predispose them to alcohol abuse as well as maintain abuse behaviors (Kranzler & Anton, 1994). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine (ProzacÒ) and sertraline (ZoloftÒ) may offer short-term reductions in alcohol consumption among heavy users. Sertraline and fluoxetine were also found to improve comorbid mood disorders (Cornelius et al., 1997). Ondansetron (ZofranÒ) and topiramate (TopomaxÒ) are currently under investigation for alcohol dependence and stimulant abuse but larger multi-site trials are needed.


TREATMENT

243

To date, the only FDA approved medication for the treatment of an ED is the SSRIs fluoxetine. Used in the treatment of BN, dosages are often higher (60 mg per day) than those that are effective for the treatment of depression (Romano, Halmi, Sarkar, Koke & Lee, 2002). See Levine and Levine, Chapter 7, for a thorough review of psychopharmacological approaches to ED treatment.

Other Interventions Historically, 12-step models have been rooted in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), which ascribes to the disease model of addiction. This model views addiction as a physical, emotional, and spiritual disease that can be arrested, but not cured. Recovery is viewed as a lifelong process that involves working the 12 steps of AA or NA (narcotics anonymous) and abstaining from the use of alcohol/drugs. This approach is the most common intervention utilized in the SUD field. Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), a form of CBT, has also been successfully utilized in the treatment of addictions. In DBT, the focus is on affect dysregulation, and it is a treatment strategy that views SA as a maladaptive method used to manage, control, or change adverse emotional states. The goal is to replace SA behaviors with more adaptive affect regulation strategies, or as Linehan and colleagues (1999) suggest, “replacing pills with skills” (p. 282). Dialectical behavioral therapy has also been found to be effective in the treatment of BN and BED (Safer, Telch & Chen, 2009). This approach views disordered eating as a problem of emotional dysregulation and teaches patients to more effectively cope with negative affect using mindfulness and emotion regulation skills rather than resorting to binge eating or purging.

Location of Treatment Matching the patient with the correct level of care begins with the initial evaluation and continues throughout treatment. Levels of care typically include outpatient, intensive outpatient and partial hospitalization, residential, and medically managed inpatient hospitalization. In considering the treatment environment, it is important to evaluate the patient’s medical and psychological status, their motivation for change, their social support network and their access to care. Table 14.1 provides an overview of useful treatment placement indicators. Clinical decisions should be made in collaboration with the patient and with consideration for the probable costs, benefits, and available resources. Although it is the clinician’s responsibility to determine the appropriate level of care, the active involvement of an informed patient is generally crucial to success. Ideally, patients are treated in the least restrictive environment, while maintaining their safety and optimizing their chances for a successful treatment outcome.

Integrated or Sequential Treatment Very few treatment centers provide specialized care for the ED patient with a SUD. Unfortunately, data on the superiority of integrated treatment versus sequential treatment are limited. In an integrated approach, the same providers treat comorbidities concurrently. Sequential treatment focuses on the most acute disorder first, and is conducted with multiple


TABLE 14.1

Level of care indicators

Level of Care

Medical

Emotional and Behavioral

Level I outpatient

Medically stable >85% Ideal body weight

Level II Intensive outpatient

Level III Medically or clinically monitored intensive residential

Readiness to Change

Environmental

Access to Care

No acute suicidal ideation

Fair to Good: Some openness and ability to change

Reasonable environmental support and structure for change

Available close to home

No serious risk for major withdrawal or seizures >80% Ideal body weight

No acute suicidal ideation

Fair: Some reluctance to change and/or limited ability to maintain change but cooperative

Some environmental support for change

Available close to home

Risk for withdrawal

Acute psychiatric problems

Poor to Fair: Resistance to change and/or limited ability to maintain change

Limited environmental support for change

May not be available close to home

Some level of acute or chronic medical problems

Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the research-practice gap

Community Treatment of Eating Disorders

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the gap

Bridging the Gap

Eating Disorders

Handbook of Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

The Treatment of Eating Disorders: A Clinical Handbook

Clinical Manual of Eating Disorders

Medical Management of Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders in Athletes

Nutrition and Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders For Dummies

Bridging the Gap: Examining Polarity in America

The Truth About Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders For Dummies

Eating Disorders Sourcebook

Bridging the gap to university mathematics

The Oxford handbook of eating disorders

The Oxford Handbook of Eating Disorders

The Management of Eating Disorders and Obesity

The Essential Handbook of Eating Disorders

Eating disorders: new directions in treatment and recovery

Self-Harm Behavior and Eating Disorders: Dynamics, Assessment and Treatment

Treatment of Eating Disorders: Bridging the research-practice gap

Community Treatment of Eating Disorders

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the Gap

Bridging the gap

Bridging the Gap

Eating Disorders

Handbook of Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders

The Treatment of Eating Disorders: A Clinical Handbook

Clinical Manual of Eating Disorders

Medical Management of Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders in Athletes

Nutrition and Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders For Dummies

Bridging the Gap: Examining Polarity in America

The Truth About Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders For Dummies

Eating Disorders Sourcebook

Bridging the gap to university mathematics

The Oxford handbook of eating disorders

The Oxford Handbook of Eating Disorders

The Management of Eating Disorders and Obesity

The Essential Handbook of Eating Disorders

Eating disorders: new directions in treatment and recovery

Self-Harm Behavior and Eating Disorders: Dynamics, Assessment and Treatment

Recommend Documents