The Prophet Armed: Trotsky: 1879-1921 (Oxford Paperbacks)

The Prophet Armed T R O T S K Y : 1879-1921

The

Prophet Armed TROTSKY: 1879-1921

ISAAC DEUTSCHER

a

I

SEO IS'

I Mm!bcr 1

1H7 Q

Hr - • - 1 J 7 2 1 S 9

O X F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y PRESS

Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford 0X2

469704

6DP

Oxford New York Toronto Delhi Bombay Calcutta Madras Karachi Petalingjaya Singapore Hong Kong Tokyo Nairobi Dar es Salaam Cape Town Melbourne Auckland and associated companies in Beirut Berlin Ibadan Nicosia

Oxford is a trade mark of Oxford University Press Copyright 1954 by Oxford University Press First published 1954 by Oxford University Press First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback 1970 Reprinted 1979, 1987 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser ISBN

0-19-281064-2

;

I

7/

Printed in Hong Kong

PREFACE first contemplated the writing of a biographical trilogy on the leaders of the Russian revolution I intended to include a study of Trotsky in Exile, not a full-scale biography of Trotsky. Trotsky's later years and the tragic close of his life stirred my imagination more deeply than did the earlier and more worldly part of his story. On second thoughts, however, I began to doubt whether Trotsky in Exile could be made at all comprehensible if the earlier part of the story was not told. Then, pondering historical materials and biographical sources, some of them new to me, I came to realize more clearly than before how deeply the drama of Trotsky's last years was rooted in the earlier and even the earliest stages of his career. I therefore decided to devote to Trotsky two separate yet interconnected volumes: The Prophet Armed and The Prophet Unarmed, the first giving what might be described as Trotsky's 5 rise', the second his 'fall'. I have refrained from using these conventional terms because I do not think that a man's rise to power is necessarily the climax of his life or that his loss of office should be equated WHEN I

...M

Willi

L:.

1115

fJl

laa.

The titles to these volumes have been suggested to me by the passage from Machiavelli printed on page xii. The present study illustrates the truth of what is there said; but it also offers a somewhat ironical commentary on it. Machiavelli's observation that 6all armed prophets have conquered and the unarmed ones have been destroyed' is certainly realistic. What may be doubted is whether the distinction between the armed prophet and the unarmed one and the difference between conquest and destruction is always as clear as it seemed to the author of The Prince. In the following pages we first watch Trotsky conquering without arms in the greatest revolution of our age. We then see him armed, victorious, and bent under the weight of his armour—the chapter portraying him at the very pinnacle of power bears the title 4 Defeat in Victory'. And when next the Prophet Unarmed is contemplated, the question will arise whether a strong element of victory was not concealed in his very defeat. My account of Trotsky's role in the Russian revolution

VI

PREFACE

will come as a surprise to some. For nearly thirty years the powerful propaganda machines of Stalinism worked furiously to expunge Trotsky's name from the annals of the revolution, or to leave it there only as the synonym for arch-traitor. To the present Soviet generation, and not only to it, Trotsky's life-story is already like an ancient Egyptian sepulchre which is known to have contained the body of a great man and the record, engraved in gold, of his deeds; but tomb-robbers and ghouls have plundered and left it so empty and desolate that no trace is found of the record it once contained. T h e work of the tombrobbers has, in this present instance, been so persistent that it has strongly affected the views even of independent Western historians and scholars. Despite all this, the record of Trotsky's life is still intact, preserved in his own voluminous but now mostly forgotten writings and in his Archives; in numerous memoirs of friendly and of hostile contemporaries; in files of Russian periodicals published before, during, and after the revolution; in minutes of the Central Committee; and in verbatim reports of the Congresses of the party and of the Soviets. Nearly all these documentary sources are available in public libraries in the West, although a few of them can be found only in private libraries. I have drawn on all these sources. Together with my wife, who shared equally with me in research and has in many other respects contributed greatly to this work, I made a special study of the rich collection of Russian pre-revolutionary periodicals in the Hoover Library at Stanford, California, where I found sources scarcely used before by historians of Russian revolutionary movements. Together with my wife I also studied the Trotsky Archives at the Houghton Library, Harvard University, by far the most important collection of original documents on Soviet history existing outside the U.S.S.R. (A brief description of the Archives is given in the bibliography at the end of this volume.) I have therefore no ground for complaining here, as I complained in the Preface to my Stalin, about paucity of biographical material. This is due largely to the contrast between my chief characters. Trotsky was as communicative about his life and activities as Stalin was secretive. He allowed complete strangers to delve freely into almost every aspect of his life; he himself wrote an autobiography; and, what is more important, a strong,

PREFACE

unconscious autobiographical streak runs through his scores of published volumes, through his innumerable articles and essays not reprinted in book form, and through some of his unpublished writings. Wherever he went he left footprints so firm that nobody could later efface or blur them, not even he himself, when on rare occasions he was tempted to do so. A biographer is not usually expected to apologize for narrating the life of a political leader who has himself written an autobiography. I feel that this case may be an exception to the rule, for after a close and critical examination I still find Trotsky's My Life as scrupulously truthful as any work of this kind can be. Nevertheless, it remains an apologia produced in the middle of the losing battle its author fought against Stalin. In its pages the living Trotsky wrestled with his tomb-robbers. T o wholesale Stalinist denigration he responded with a peculiar act of selfdefence which savoured of self-glorification‫ ־‬He did not and could not satisfactorily explain the change in the climate of the revolution which made his defeat both possible and inevitable; and his account of the intrigues by which a narrow-minded, 'usurpatory', and malignant bureaucracy ousted him from power is obviously inadequate. T h e question which is of absorbing interest to the biographer is: to what extent did Trotsky himself contribute to his own defeat? T o what extent was he himself compelled by critical circumstances and by his own character to pave the way for Stalin? T h e answer to these questions reveals the truly classical tragedy of Trotsky's life, or rather a reproduction of classical tragedy in secular terms of modern politics; and Trotsky would have been more than h u m a n if he had been able to reveal it. T h e biographer, on the other hand, sees Trotsky at the climax of his achievement as being as guilty and as innocent and as ripe for expiation as a protagonist in Greek drama. This approach, presupposing sympathy and understanding, is, I trust, as free from denunciation as from apologetics. I n My Life Trotsky sought to vindicate himself in terms imposed upon him by Stalin and by the whole ideological situation of Bolshevism in the 1920s, that is, in terms of the Lenin cult. Stalin had denounced him as Lenin's inveterate enemy, and Trotsky was consequently anxious to prove his complete devotion to, and his agreement with, Lenin. His devotion to

viii

PREFACE

Lenin after 1917 was undoubtedly genuine; and the points of agreement between them were numerous and important. Nevertheless, Trotsky blurred the sharp outlines and the importance of his controversies with Lenin between 1903 and 1917, and also of later differences. But another and much stranger consequence of the fact that Trotsky made his apologia in terms of the Lenin cult was that in some crucial points he belittled his own role in comparison with Lenin's, a feat extremely rare in autobiographical literature. This applies especially to the account of the part he played in the October uprising and in the creation of the Red Army, where he detracted from his own merits in order not to appear as Lenin's detractor. Free from loyalties to any cult, I have attempted to restore the historical balance. Finally, I have paid special attention to Trotsky the man of letters, the pamphleteer, the military writer, and the journalist. Most of Trotsky's literary work is now wrapt in oblivion and inaccessible to a wider public. Yet this is the writer of whom Bernard Shaw, who could judge Trotsky's literary qualities only from poor translations, said that he 4 surpassed Junius and B u r k e ' 4 ‫ ־‬L i k e LessingV Shaw wrote of Trotsky, 4 when he cuts off his opponent's head, he holds it up to show that there are no brains in it; but he spares his victim's private character. . . . He leaves [his victim] without a rag of political credit; but he leaves him with his honour intact.' 1 I can only regret that considerations of space and composition have not allowed me to show this side of Trotsky's personality in greater detail; but I hope to return to it in The Prophet Unarmed. I. D. 1

The Nation, L o n d o n , 7 J a n . 1922.

CONTENTS PREFACE

V

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

X

I. HOME A N D SCHOOL

I

II. IN SEARCH OF AN IDEAL

22

III. A T THE DOOR OF HISTORY

57

IV. A N I N T E L L E C T U A L P A R T N E R S H I P

98

V. TROTSKY IN I 9 0 5 VI

6

‫־‬

11 7

PERMANENT R

VIL THE DOLDRUMS:

E

V

O

L

U

T

I

O

I907-I914

VIII. W A R A N D T H E I N T E R N A T I O N A L IX‫ ־‬TROTSKY IN T H E OCTOBER R E V O L U T I O N X. T H E P E O P L E ' S COMMISSAR XI. T H E DRAMA OF BREST LITOVSK XII. ARMING THE R E P U B L I C XIII. R E V O L U T I O N A N D CONQUEST NOTE ON TROTSKY'S MILITARY WRITINGS

N

1

4 175 211 249 32^ 346 405 448 477

XIV. D E F E A T IN VICTORY

486

BIBLIOGRAPHY

523

INDEX

529 MAP

(following page x) Territories Occupied by Anti-Bolshevik Armies in 1919 and 1920

5

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I AM greatly indebted for criticism and friendly encouragement to Professor E. H. Garr and Mrs. Barbara Ward-Jackson, who read parts of my manuscript; and to Mr. Donald Tyerman, who read the whole. Mr. Bernard Singer helped me with his intimate knowledge of Russian life. To Mr. D. M. Davin and members of the Editorial Staff of the Oxford University Press I am grateful for many suggestions for improvements in style. Mr. Hugo Dewar and Mr. Jon Kimche kindly assisted me with materials and books, some of which are now bibliographical rarities. My thanks are given to Professor Wm. A. Jackson and his assistants at the Houghton Library, Harvard University, who helped my wife and me to find our way through the dossiers of the Trotsky Archives. I am similarly obliged to the Staffs of the Hoover Library, the London Library, the British Museum, and the National Central Library. The generosity of the Oxford University Press and the Humanities Department of the Rockefeller Foundation enabled my wife and me to spend many months in the United States and to carry out that part of our research programme which depended entirely on our access to the above-mentioned American libraries. My debt to other authors is acknowledged in footnotes. The quotation from Machiavelli's The Prince on page xii is taken by permission of J . M. Dent & Sons Ltd., from the translation by W. K. Marriott in the Everyman's Library. I. D.

Murmansk

M• •••••v.‫׳‬

Al mÊmMfcèM •

.-.

•

MOSCOW‫׳‬

TERRITORIES OCCUPIED | BY ANTI-BOLSHEVIK ARMIES | IN I919 AND 1920 Fronts of armies in (ï:;;;‫^;׳‬ ïïÛiïïM

Sebastopol