From this, in particular,
it follows that ~v(z)~(z)(v->---~-~ ) i n ' E x p e ( C ~ ) i f
i) there exists a number r...
6 downloads
261 Views
150KB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
From this, in particular,
it follows that ~v(z)~(z)(v->---~-~ ) i n ' E x p e ( C ~ ) i f
i) there exists a number r < R such that Uv(Z)6 a bounded set;
and only if
) (v = i, 2,...) and form in Expr(C~ )
2) uv(z) -+ 0 locally uniformly in C~, i.e., uniformly on any compact set ~ c C ~ . Remark.
It is possible to admit R = ,~.
Then
tim ind Exp7 (C~)= Exp (C~), i.e., it coincides with the space of all functions of exponential type equipped with the inductive-limit topology. 2.
The Basic Space Expo(Cz ~)
Let Q ~ C ~ be an arbitrary open set in the space of the variables ~ = ( ~ .... ,~n) ( t h e s e are future dual variables in the Fourier sense). Further, let ~ = (%~ .... ,Xn) be an arbitrary point. We denote by R(X) the radius of the maximal polycylinder~U~(~)={~:]~]--%i[~(%)~ , j = l,...,n} lying entirely in ~ . Definition 2.1.
We set
Exp~ (C~)= {e (z): where the values
%@~
Definition 2.2. tions are satisfied:
tt(z)=~eZz~z(z)},
run through a l l p o s s i b l e f i n i t e c o l l e c t i o n s We say that uv(z) + u(z) in space
and ~z (z)6 Exp.(x) (C~).
Exp~(C~)( if the following two condi-
i) there exists a finite collection of values %6~ such that for all v = I, 2,
( z ) = ~ eZ~%~(z), 2)
Thv(z)'-+~z(z)
~xv (z)E Exp~r (C~);
in Expe(~) (C~).
As already noted, the space Exp~(Cz) is the basic space for construction of the theory of p/d operators with symbol A(E) analytic in ~. However, before giving the definition of a p/d operator A(D) with analytic symbol, we present a description of the space Expa(C~) in familiar topological terms. We introduce the notation
e x* Expm~ ~(C~)={u (z): u (z) e-X*E Expmz ~(C~)}. Suppose now t h a t
@ eXzExp~cx) (C~) is the d i r e c t ( a l g e b r a i c ) sum of the spaces eX~ExpR(x)(C~).
By d e f i n i t i o n ( s e e , for example, [34, 40], e t c . ) the elements of t h i s sum are f i n i t e formal sums O uz (z), where uz (z)Eexz Exp~c~ (C.9, or, e q u i v a l e n t l y , c o l l e c t i o n s {uz (z)},, LEf21among which only a f i n i t e number of the f u n c t i o n s u~(z) are nonzero. and {v~(z)} in the case where
where the s ~ a t i o n the factored s u m
We i d e n t i f y the c o l l e c t i o n s
sign denotes the ordinary sum of functions. ~Exp~(~)(C~)/fW,
where JH-----[~tt~(z): ~ ( z ) ~ _ 0
{u~(z))
In other words, we consider I.
It is clear that the
cor-
J
respondence u(z) N), we obtain the chain Of imbeddings
Exp (rl;C~)cExp (F2; C~)c . . . . where o b v i o u s l y each of t h e s p a c e s i s a c l o s e d s u b s p a c e in t h e n e x t .
Hence,
Expa (C~)=lira ind Exp (P~; C~) is a regular inductive limit. From familiar properties for example, [34]) it follows that the sequence uv(z) + is an index N such thatuv(z)CExp(FN; C~) for all v = i, In correspondence with Sec. 1 this means that all u,(z)
of regular inductive limits (see, 0 in Exp~(C~) if and only if there 2 .... and uv(z) ยง 0 in Exp(F~; C~). have the form
u~ (z) ----e~,~%~ (z) ~k... + e ~ N % ~ (z),
(2.3)
where ~v~j(z)cExp~j(C~), r j < R ( k i ) , j = 1. . . . . N, and infl]~v~j(z)[]r/-+0, where t h e infimum i s t a k e n over a l l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s of u v ( z ) in t h e form ( 2 . 3 ) . As i s n o t hard t o s e e , from t h i s
i t f o l l o w s t h a t c o n v e r g e n c e in Exp~(Cz) d e f i n e d by t h e
topology introduced is majorized by the convergence of Definition 2.2. We use the latter convergence below although everything said below holds also for the inductive topology introduced. 3.
A Density Lemma
We shall need below the fact of the density of linear combinations of exponentials in the space Exp~(C~. LEMMA 3.1.
The linear hull of the exponentials exp~z, ~E~, is dense in the space Exp~(C~).
Proof. First of all, we note that a function u(z)6Expn(C~), just as any entire function, can be approximated by linear combinations of exponentials in the sense of locally uniform convergence in C~, i.e., uniform convergence on compact sets. Indeed, for any entire function its Taylor series converges in C~ locally uniformly. Further, for any ~ we have
2752