Lxjndon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. 144
Introduction to Uniform Spaces I.M. James Savilian Professor of G...
83 downloads
1325 Views
50MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Lxjndon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. 144
Introduction to Uniform Spaces I.M. James Savilian Professor of Gcomclry Malhemalical Insiiiuie, Uiiiversily of Oxford
ΓΑ» ngh! nf the Univi-rsitv oi Conthrulgf fa print and SfH all manner nf bmiks IROJ arunu-ii >/_V Henry VU! in 1534. The Univeniiy has printo! Ofd publish ft! (ontuinousiy
C A M B R n X i E UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge New York
Port Chester Melbourne
Svdnev
Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 IRP 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011, USA 10, Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia © Cambridge University Press 1990 First published 1990 Printed in Great Britain at the University Press, Cambridge Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data available British Library cataloguing in publication data available
ISBN 0 521 38620 9
(.1
Contents
Introduction 1.
Uniform
structures
2.
I n d u c e d and c o i n d u c e d u n i f o r m
3.
The u n i f o r m
4.
Completeness
5.
Topological
6.
Uniform
transformation
7.
Uniform
s p a c e s over a base
8.
Uniform c o v e r i n g Append i x :
topology completion
groups
spaces
f iIter s
Exercises Bibliography Index
and
groups
structures
iniroauciion
T h i s b o o k i s b a s e d on a c o u r s e given at
the University
and g r a d u a t e
students.
but t h e remainder i s published
of Oxford
Here f o r
and o t h e r s
in
subject
in Chapter
at l e a s t
an o u t l i n e
II
of
Bourbaki
text
several
s p e c i a l i z e d monographs,
Roelcke
and D i e r o l f
to general
many f i n d
chapters
topological
stage.
no k n o w l e d g e o f
topology.
b a s i c k n o w l e d g e of
topology
u n i f o r m w o r l d and t h e
Γ 2 ].
it
is
[25]
the
However,
on t o p o l o g y
such as I s b e l l
the
contain are
[ 7 J, P a g e
[19J,
others. the transition is
from
metric
a major s t e p
Uniform
I have t h e r e f o r e
i n s u c h a way t h a t
a c c o u n t of
Moreover t h e r e
spaces
extremely d i f f i c u l t .
intermediate
books
amongst
For s t u d e n t s o f m a t h e m a t i c s spaces
classical
I n d e e d much o f
The c l a s s i c
the theory.
[21],
undergraduati
s p a c e s was d e v e l o p e d by W e i l
t h e more r e c e n t of
recently
time.
the t h i r t i e s .
of
lectures
the m a t e r i a l i s
not so well-known.
the f i r s t
majority
sixteen
t o an a u d i e n c e o f
About h a l f
The t h e o r y o f u n i f o r m
is
of
which
s p a c e s make an
w r i t t e n the
excellent
first
two
t h e y c a n b e r e a d by a s t u d e n t The s e c o n d two c h a p t e r s
with
assume a
and a r e aimed a t s h o w i n g how t h e
t o p o l o g i c a l world are
related.
The m o n o g r a p h s on t h e t h e o r y m e n t i o n e d a b o v e are w r i t t e n tr.ainly
w i t h t h e n e e d s of
analysts
in mind.
Rather
o v e r t h e same g r o u n d a g a i n I h a v e c h o s e n t o e x p l o r e aspect
of
the s t a r t
the theory. that
Although
it
t h a n go
a different
has been r e c o g n i z e d
tODoloaical q r o u p s c a n p r o f i t a b l y
be
from
regarded
as unLXorm s p a c e s , that
it
is
I do n o t b e l i e v e
possible
groups.
t o d e v e l o p a t h e o r y of uniform
on n a t u r a l l y
to the
in the f i n a l
presented
t h e o r y of u n i f o r m
a b a s e and h e n c e t o t h e t h e o r y o f
uniform
transformation here.
spaces
covering
over
forty
find
exercises,
a l s o an a p p e n d i x c o n t a i n i n g
a short bibliography
t2J.
an o u t l i n e
book I h a v e ,
[21 J.
Ling for
[ 2 4 J.
and P r o f e s s o r some h e l p f u l
final
draft
e s c a p e d my
of
Finally,
the r e s u l t s
the
concerning
greatly relied
of Arens [ I J , like
on
by t h e work
of
consulted
Collins
t o t h a n k Mr.
Don S h i m a m o t o , w h o a t t e n d e d t h e
suggestions;
is
text.
of c o u r s e ,
I would
literature
There
Of t h e many p a p e r s I h a v e
I would p a r t i c u l a r l y m e n t i o n t h o s e and d e V r i e s
of
A l s o I h a v e b e e n much i n f l u e n c e d
R o e l c k e and D i e r o l f
and
mainly derived xron t h e
w h i c h a r e n e e d e d i n t h e main
In w r i t i n g t h i s Bourbaki
over
spaces,
on t h e s u b j e c t b u t w i t h some new p r o b l e m s a s w e l l .
filters
appreciated
section.
At t h e e n d t h e r e a d e r w i l l of
has been l u i i y
An o u t l i n e o f s u c h a t h e o r y i s
This leads
a set
it
Γ4] Paul
lectures,
l a t t e r very kindly
read
t h e t e x t and d e t e c t e d v a r i o u s e r r o r s w h i c h
the had
attention.
Mathematical I n s t i t u t e , J u l y 1989
Oxford
1.
Uniform structures
Let u s s t a r t
by r e c a l l i n g
from
t h e t h e o r y of r e l a t i o n s .
set
X
is
We w r i t e to
just ζΗη
η.
a subset when
Given
ξ
R
(ζ,η)
some n o t a t i o n
and
terminology
Formally a r e l a t i o n of
the c a r t e s i a n
square
and s a y t h a t
ξ
is
R-related
For e a c h s u b s e t
Η
of
€ R
we d e n o t e
on a g i v e n X χ X.
by
R[5] = {η : ζΚη} the s e t
of
R-relatives
of
ζ.
X
we
write R[H] = Note t h a t
υ RCei CcH
if
.
{Hj} i s
a family
of
s u b s e t s of
X
then
R[uHj ] = u R [ H j ] ; in g e n e r a l ,
however,
R[nH^ ]
The i d e n t i t y r e l a t i o n X X X.
A relation
reflexiv e. given
The r e v e r s e
on
a proper
X
is
nR[H^J.
j u s t the diagonal
which c o n t a i n s of
s u b s e t of
ΔΧ
a relation
R
is is
said
to
ΔΧ
of
be
the r e l a t i o n
R^
by if
We d e s c r i b e
R
and o n l y i f as symmetric
identity relation
is
The c o n p o s i t i o n is
R
is
the r e l a t i o n
ηΚξ
.
if
R = R ^;
for example
the
symmetric. of r e l a t i o n s
R S
on
X
R,
g i v e n by
S
on t h e ζ(Η
same s e t
» S)n
if
X
and onl'i
i-
I.M. James
if
ς5ζ
and
Also note
ζΗη
associative
ξ
Composition of
(but g e n e r a l l y
not commutative)
is
Η
for repeated compositions
length
such t h a t
i = 0 , . . . , n - l
equivalence
the
sarjection
.
to
η
ζ
when
i.e.
the n a t u r a l After of u n i f o r m
R
x^ = η
and t r a n s i t i v e and
R[ζ J
π : X + X/R,
»
.
is
bracketing
as
related
to
η
by
of
x^Rx^^^
points
for
if
R = R c R.
then
R
is called classes
is
if
is
s a i d t o be an
the equivalence
i s d e n o t e d by
g i v e n by
R
π(ξ)
= R[5J ,
X/R is
class and
called
projection. these preliminaries structure
The members o f the n o t a t i o n s
on a g i v e n
Ω on
for
all
This
such
the
definition
structure certain
relations
t h e o r y are s t i l l
A uniform X χ X
X.
are not c a l l e d
relation
(I . 1 ) .
set
square X χ χ s a t i s f y i n g
the f i l t e r of
we a r e r e a d y f o r
but
s t r u c t u r e on a g i v e n
set
that
ΔΧ c D
D t Ω ,
(ii)
D e Ω
implies
D ^ e Ω ,
D e n
implies
Ε « Ε c D
for
some
Ε e Ω.
is
a
conditions. (although
used)
(i)
(iiil
and s o
such
is
and
as t r a n s i t i v e
on t h e c a r t e s i a n
Definition
relations
a sequence
The s e t o f e q u i v a l e n c e
a filter
=
.
relation,
ς.
factors)
n,
symmetric
of
(n
x^ = ζ ,
We d e s c r i b e reflexive,
of
R"-related
an R - c h a i n o f
filter
Note t h a t
X.
i s unnecessary
X
ς.
= R[S[H]]
for e a c h s u b s e t
of
seme
that
(RoS)[H]
Thus
for
entourages.
X
is
uniform Λΐ! uLiuf c^ Note t n a t that
for
any
E" c D. is
to
(iii) η > 1
exists
this
to the
an e n t o u r a g e
condition Ε
such
that
e x t e n s i o n w i t h o u t comment i n what
follow.
uniform
structure
notation. uniform
on
structure
refine s
fi,
Ω = Ω'
is
Definition X an
s p a c e we mean a s e t X;
usually
Λ r e f i n e m e n t of
an e n t o u r a g e o f
is
there
We s h a l l u s e
By a u n i f o r m
set
e x t e n d s by i t e r a t i o n
Ώ'
X
alone
a uniform
In t h i s
is
sufficient
structure
Ω
coarsens
The d i s c r e t e
i s the structure
Ω of
is
a
Ω
is
s i t u a t i o n we s a y t h a t β'.
t o be e x c l u d e d we d e s c r i b e
(1.2).
together with a
such t h a t each entourage
Ω'.
or t h a t
X
If
Ω'
the p o s s i b i l i t y
the refinement
uniform
also
structure
as
that
strict.
on a g i v e n
i n which e v e r y s u p e r s e t of
the
diagonal
entourage. In t h i s
space.
s i t u a t i o n we d e s c r i b e
Clearly
o t h e r uniform Definition
the d i s c r e t e
structure.
(1.3).
set
X
sole
entourage. In t h i s
space.
uniform
filter
uniform
points
structure
uniform
s u p e r s e t s of
that the base g e n e r a t e s the
X
every
X
X χ χ
is
the
uniform
i s refined
has a t
by
least
and t h e
three
well.
so t h a t t h e members of the base,
In t h e c a s e
of
two
trivial
least
structures as
t h e members o f filter.
on a g i v e n
has at
structure
When
by a b a s e ,
set
structure
Provided
are d i f f e r e n t .
is given
uniform
refines
as a t r i v i a l
t h e r e are other uniform
a filter are the
X
uniform
structure.
the d i s c r e t e
structure
distinct If
points
structure
i n which the f u l l
the t r i v i a l
e v e r y o t h e r uniform
as a d i s c r e t e
At t h e o t h e r e x t r e m e we h a v e
s i t u a t i o n we d e s c r i b e
Clearly
distinct
uniform
The t r i v i a l
i s the structure
X
the
we s a y a uniform
I.M. James s t r u c t u r e we s a y t h a t t h e b a s e g e n e r a t e s and d e s c r i b e t h e members o f
t h e uniform
the base as b a s i c
structure
entourages.
For e x a m p l e t h e s y m m e t r i c e n t o u r a g e s a l w a y s form a b a s e , we s h a l l be u s i n g
frequently.
i s g e n e r a t e d by t h e Reversing for
a filter
our v i e w p o i n t , Ω
(1.1), (i)
as
on
X χ X.
s u p p o s e t h a t we have a b a s e For
ii
for
all
implies
Ε c
(iii)
D e 8
implies
Ε » Ε c D
Apart from t h e m o d i f i c a t i o n
for
to
For e x a m p l e ,
consider
d i t i o n s are s a t i s f i e d = { (ζ ,η) ,
sane
for
(ii),
a r e t h e same a s t h o s e on
Η χ Ε
Ω
some
therefore,
the
conditions
itself.
the r e a l
line
by t h e f a m i l y
of
JR.
The t h r e e
|ζ - η|
• D ,
since
for
a n o t h e r way of
uniform
preserving
« D",
and s o
There i s
n,
is
a symmetric entourage
such t h a t
some
λ
suppose that
Then t h e r e e x i s t s e X
all
= λ(η).
Conversely
ς,η
i s uniformly
is uniformly
space
: X -»· Ε
D = (λχλ)
for
X
uniform
λ
continuous function
consider
ε X
X
space
image s e n s e ,
The f u n c t i o n
as
i s uniformly
there e x i s t s
an e n t o u r a g e
Y,
open i f Ε
objects
structure-
follows.
φ : X
spaces,
the
of
where
X
for each Y
such
and
entourage that
Ε[φ (χ) ] c φ ( D C x ] ) for
all
X £ X.
Of c o u r s e i t for
sufficent
if
the condition i s
b a s i c e n t o u r a g e s when t h e u n i f o r m
by a b a s e . when *
is
Y
For example
is discrete.
φ
is
structure
of
always uniformly
In the s i t u a t i o n
of
(1.8)
T h e r e is an error in t h e corresDOndino result
satisfied X
is
given
open the (9.34)
condition of
[101.
for
φ
exists
t o be u n i f o r m l y an
η € Y,
e > 0
implies
open i s
such t h a t that
that
for
σ(φ{χ),η)
ρ(χ,ζ)
< δ for
each
< t,
some
δ > 0
there
where ξ 6 X
χ e X such
and
that
Φ (ξ.) = η . Note that its inverse continuous uniform
i s uniformly
(1.13).
continuous.
Let
and l e t
are uniform
and o n l y
Consequently
open i f
if
a uniformly
and o n l y i f
it
is
a
φ : X
ψ ; Y
spaces.
Ζ
If
Y
be a u n i f o r m l y
be a f u n c t i o n ,
ψφ : X
Ζ
continuous
where
X,
i s uniformly
Y
and
open
then
ψ . For l e t
is
open i f
equivalence.
surjection
so i s
i s uniformly
b i j e c t i o n i s uniformly
Proposition
Ζ
a bijection
Ε
be any e n t o u r a g e o f
an e n t o u r a g e o f
exists
X.
an e n t o u r a g e
If
F
of
ψφ
Y.
Then
i s uniformly
Ζ
such
is
uniformly
D = (φχφ) open t h e n
^E
there
that
F[ψφ (x) J c ψφΟ[χ] for
all
X £ X.
Then
ρ[ψ (y) ] c ψΕΓγ:; for
all
y £ Y,
Proposition ψ : Y ->· Ζ and
Ζ
so i s
and s o
(1.14).
ψ
Let
φ : X
be a u n i f o r m l y
are uniform
continuous
spaces.
If
be a f u n c t i o n injection,
ψφ
and
where
i s uniformly
let X, Y
open
then
φ . For l e t
D
be a n y e n t o u r a g e o f
open t h e r e e x i s t s an e n t o u r a g e Ε[ψφ(χ)] is
Y
open.
c ψφθ[χ]
an e n t o u r a g e o f
Suppose t h a t
for
all
Y ,
η £ Ε[φ(χ)]
F
points
since .
ψ Then
of
X . Ζ
If such
χ £ X .
is
uniformli
that
Now
i s uniformly ψ(η)
ψφ
Ε =
(ψχψ)~^Ε
continuous.
ε Γ[ψφ(χ)]
c ψφΟ[χ]
I.M. James and s o
ψ(η)
=
ψφ(ξ)
i n j e c t i v e we h a v e Ε[φ(x)]
c φΟ[χ]
Proposition where
so i s
some
η = φ(ζ) and s o
(1.15).
X, Y
uniformly
for
and
Ζ
φ
: X
open s u r j e c t i o n .
Since
η e φΟ[χ]
Y
ψφ
is
Thus asserted.
ψ : Y
spaces.
If
.
open, as
and
ψ
Ζ
be
functions,
Suppose t h a t
i s uniformly
φ
is a
continuous
then
ψ .
an e n t o u r a g e of Since
ψ
φ (ζ)
Ζ
Ε[φ(χ)]
e Ε[φ(χ)]
η £ D[x] this
and t h e n
Proposition function,
then
X Y
For s i n c e
for ζ
Let and
X e X
χ £ X .
then
So
Since
continuous,
φ : X
Y
for
an e n t o u r a g e
ψφ(ζ)
as
Ε
X .
of
Y
some = ψφ(η)
open
If φ
X
is
and
of
of
asserted.
spaces.
X
is
Y
is
surjective.
Φ such
is
uni-
that
= ΦΧ , Hence
η=1,2,... (φ{χ),η)
for
be a u n i f o r m l y
a r e uniform
Ε
F
if
φ (ξ) = φ ( η )
i s an e n t o u r a g e of
χ £ Χ .
we h a v e
£ X
Y
open t h e r e e x i s t s
Ε"[φΧ] c φχ
i s an e n t o u r a g e
i s uniformly connected then
X x X
points
all
i s uniformly
Είφ (χ) ] = φ( ( Χ χ Χ ) [ χ ] ) all
If
o p e n t h e r e e x i s t s an e n t o u r a g e
seme
(1.16).
n o n - e m p t y and
D = (ψφχψφ)"^Ρ
(ψφ (x) ,ψφ (η) ) £ F .
ψ
where
i s uniformly continuous.
c φο[χ]
for
shows t h a t
formly
ψφ
i s uniformly
such that
as
.
i s uniformly
are uniform
For s u p p o s e t h a t
for
and s o
φ
Let
ζ e D[x]
Ε [ φ χ ] c φχ
.
e e"
So i f for
seme
and
η £ Υ η
so then for
and s o
any
η £ φΧ
required. To c o n c l u d e
this
section
p l a y s an i m p o r t a n t r o l e mentioned pair
of
in the
transverse
X χ X ,
to each other i f
the diaqonal
ΔΧ .
concept
which
in the theory although I cannot find
literature.
s u b s e t s of
I introduce a further
F i r s t of a l l , for their
l e t us say that a
a given set intersection
More s p e c i f i c a l l v ,
it
X ,
are
i s contained
suppose t h a t
X
is
in a
Uniform structures uniform
s p a c e and t h a t
Let us
R
i s an e q u i v a l e n c e r e l a t i o n
s a y t h a t an e n t o u r a g e
D η R = ΔΧ . determined that φ
l:
R = (φχφ)~^ΔΥ than
entourage
is
,
φ : X
Y ,
R .
Note t h a t
of
s i n c e any s u b s e t
also
we s i m p l y
transverse.
X
to the
and o n l y
(1.17) .
where
Y
X ,
if
is
Let
and
Ζ
i s a uniformly
verse
to
ψ
then
(ii)
if
φ
i s a uniformly
then if
and
Y
φ Y
is
is
Φ(ζ)
e D
and
= φ{η)
,
one
to
transverse of
trans-
entourage
structure of
X
is
is
is
to the projection
continuous
of
to
to
ψ
where
Ε
hence X
X
(iii),
transverse
to
φ
and l e t
transverse
to
ψ ;
then
transverse
D Ε
Y
is
X
is
is
trans
transverse
to
which i s
transverse
transverse
to
to
ψφ .
i n t h e c a s e of to
(φ ( ξ ) , Φ ( η ) )
ψ;
ψφ ;
e Ε
and
let
D
then
E,
transverse
be a n e n t o u r a g e o f
(i),
if
(ii) ,
be an e n t o u r a g e of
D η (φχφ)~^Ε
t o ψφ .
is
Thus,
transverse
of
let
X
In t h e c a s e of
which i s
Y
ψφ ;
if
then
then
ζ = η.
i s an e n t o u r a g e
i n j e c t i o n and
is transverse
ψφ (ξ ) = ψ φ ( η )
be f u n c t i o n
ψ ;
continuous, to
Ζ
Then:
o p e n s u r j e c t i o n and
transverse
,
ψ : Y
spaces.
transverse
I n t h e c a s e of
which i s
so
transverse
consisting
and
are s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d .
a n e n t o u r a g e of (1.12),
is
transverse
D = (φχφ)~^Ε
(ξ,η)
in
X
i s uniformly
The p r o o f s let
of
structure
is
is a set, is
the uniform
Y
a r e uniform
φ
φ
Y
a transverse
transverse
φ : X
If
(iii)
of
say t h a t
it
(i)
ΨΦ
R
X .
point-space.
Proposition
to
t e r m when
D
a base
For e x a m p l e t h e u n i f o r m
if
if
where
to
the e x i s t e n c e
verse entourages, transverse;
R
and t h e n we s a y t h a t
implies the e x i s t e n c e
discrete
transverse
We s h a l l g e n e r a l l y u s e t h i s
by a f u n c t i o n
rather
D
on
X Y
to
so be as ψ .
which which
i s an e n t o u r a g e of
is is X
It
i.ivi.jomes By a l o c a l u n i f o r m
and u n i f o r m l y uniform verse
open f u n c t i o n
spaces,
to
.
The r e a s o n f o r
equivalences
Let
continuous functions,
Y is
are trans-
emerge
in
local uniform
By c o m b i n i n g
we o b t a i n
φ : X -»• Y
where
X
local
i s a l o c a l uniform e q u i v a l e n c e .
continuous
and
is also a
A l s o t h e c o m p o s i t i o n of
(1.18).
X
s t r u c t u r e of
equivalence
w i t h our p r e v i o u s r e s u l t s
Proposition
where
the terminology w i l l
Clearly a uniform
uniform e q u i v a l e n c e .
(1.17)
φ : X + Y ,
such t h a t t h e uniform
φ .
Section 3
e q u i v a l e n c e we mean a u n i f o r m l y
X, Y
and
and
Ζ
ψ : Y ->• Ζ
be u n i f o r m l y
are uniform
spaces.
Then: (i)
if
φ
i s an i n j e c t i o n ,
a l o c a l uniform
equivalence,
ψφ
then
i s uniformly ψφ
is
o p e n and
ψ
a l o c a l uniform
is
equiva-
lence; (ii)
if
uniform
i s a uniformly
φ
equivalence then
One f u r t h e r Proposition function, φ
(1.19).
where
φ
φ : X ->• Y Y
inverse
ψ
e n t o u r a g e of
Y
such t h a t
continuous. Υ . since
If Ε'
(Γΐ,φψ(η)) Ji(n)
is
η c Ε'[φ(χ)]
ε Ε ο Ε ,
= ΨΦΨ(η)
Ε ο Ε
Ε
is t r a n s v e r s e
to
an e n t o u r a g e of
and
Suppose
and l e t
Consider the entourage
f- F ,
continuous that
equivalence.
open.
b e a n y e n t o u r a g e of
^E
spaces.
is
which i s a l o c a l uniform
D
(φψχφψ)
local
equivalence .
be a u n i f o r m l y
a r e uniform
For l e t
F =
is a
w h i c h may be w o r t h m e n t i o n i n g
and
i s uniformly
and ψφ
i s a l o c a l uniform
ψ
Let
X
admits a l e f t
Then
result
open s u r j e c t i o n
,
where
X
Y ,
since
symmetric
ψ . is
Then
uniformly
Ε' = Ε η F η (ψχψ)~^0
χ e Χ ,
η « Ε[φ (χ) ] ,
φψ
be a
then
since
which i s
transverse
we o b t a i n t h a t
η = ΦΦ (η)
φψ(η) £ Ε [ φ ( χ ) ] ,
Ε ' c: Ε .
to .
ψ.
of
Hence
Since
But we a l s o
have
Uniform structures ψ (n)
e D[x]
,
since
η = ΦΨ (η)
£ ψΟ[χ].
uniformly
open,
uniformly
continuous
of
Y
for
this
i
(ψχφ)Ε'
c D ,
Therefore
as asserted.
Ε'[φ ( χ ) ]
so c φΟ[χ]
I n f a c t we o n l y
and t r a n s v e r s e
conclusion
and
t o be
need
t o the uniform
obtained.
and s o ψ
φ t o be
structure
is
2.
Induced and coinduced uniform
S u p p o s e t h a t we h a v e a f u n c t i o n a set
and
Y
(φχφ)
^E,
where
uniform
is
a uniform Ε
structure
φ
trivial
on
X,
if
Y
called
continuous.
structure
X.
structure
then
relation
determined
More g e n e r a l l y
Y
d e t e r m i n e d by t h e p s e u d c m e t r i c structure
σ
then
φ : X •>· Y
and
uniform
space
and
uniform
structure
is
transitive
ψ : Y X
and
Ζ Y
induced
by
X
are s e t s .
φ.
Or we c a n g i v e
structure
induced
by
ψφ;
the r e s u l t
X
uniform
is clearly
structure
. sense.
Ζ
X
the
^ΔΥ
uniform
We c a n g i v e
by
is Y
a the
the uniform uniform
the
same.
of
the
induced
ψ : Y
Ζ
property i s characteristic
structure.
Proposition where
has the
where
and t h e n g i v e
the
example,
in the following
induced
uniform
has
R = (φχφ)
σ(φχφ)
structure
The f o l l o w i n g
Y
has the
be f u n c t i o n s ,
ψ
for
has t h e uniform
d e t e r m i n e d by t h e p s e u d c m e t r i c
The a b o v e p r o c e d u r e Let
if
if
X
by t h e e q u i v a l e n c e
φ.
structure.
For another
structure generated
is
Y, g e n e r a t e a
structure
For e x a m p l e ,
then so does
X
images
the induced uniform
has the d i s c r e t e uniform
by
where
The i n v e r s e
as the c o a r s e s t uniform
i s uniformly
uniform
φ : X -»• γ ,
runs through the e n t o u r a g e s of
T h i s may b e d e s c r i b e d which
space.
structures
X,
(2.1). Y
the uniform i s uniformly
and
Let Ζ
structure
φ : X ->• Y
and
are uniform
spaces.
i n d u c e d by
ψ
continuous
if
Suppose t h a t
from t h a t o f
and o n l y i f
ψφ
be
is
Z.
uniformly
functions, Y Then
has φ
Induced and coinduced uniform structures continuous. For l e t for
Ε
be a b a s i c
some e n t o u r a g e
structure. is
If
ψφ
an e n t o u r a g e
of
(φχφ)~^Ε =
iently
uniform
i s uniformly
for
φ : X
Λ useful
special
φ
continuous
is
X
and
then
(ψφχψφ)
continuous,
is
^F
injective
as is
t o be u s e d . Y
injective
continuous
sufficient Let
X
and
(uniformly
X
suffic-
We d e s c r i b e
are uniform
and
asserted.
spaces,
has t h e
as
induced
injections
condition
φ : X ->• Y Y
i s given
left
embedd-
in
be a u n i f o r m l y
are uniform
continuous)
are unifonn
spaces.
continuous
Suppose t h a t
inverse.
Then
(>
is
is
an
embedding.
For i f
ψ : Y -»• X
e n t o u r a g e of
X
e n t o u r a g e of
Y .
then
is a left (φχφ)
The i n d u c e d u n i f o r m
structure
structure
is called
the r e l a t i v e uniform
is called t r a c e s on
to a subset
a s u b s p a c e of A χ A
φ : X ·• Y be t r a n s v e r s e
Let
be u n i f o r m l y to
Y .
t h e empty s e t and t h e
full
We p r o v e
X, Y
and
Ζ
be u n i f o r m
continuous functions If
φα = φ3
spaces.
Let
and l e t
φ : Y -»• Ζ
tlien t h e
coincidenci
I.M. James set
Μ = Μ(α,Β)
of
For
be
let
transverse a,Β
Ε
to
α
β
i s uniformly
open i n
a symmetric e n t o u r a g e of
φ .
Let
are uniformly
are entourages
and
D
be any e n t o u r a g e
continuous
of
X .
Y
the preimages
X .
such t h a t
of
X .
Ε Ε
Since
( α χ α ) ( β χ β )
Write
D' = D η (αχα)~^Ε η (βχβ)~^Ε If
ζ
α(χ)
c D'[u(x)] = Β(χ)
and
( α ( ζ ) , β (ξ))
where
to
φ ,
for
= φβ(ξ)
= β(ζ),
χ ε Μ ,
(2.6)
with
(1.16)
Let
X, Y
(2.7).
uniformly
connected.
functions
and l e t
φα = φ β
Let
and
,
then Therefore
and
i.e.
ξ
and s o
Μ
we Ζ
α, β : X
φ : Y
Ζ
Ε · Ε
ε Μ . is
is
Thus
uniformly
obtain be uniform Y
set
spaces,
be u n i f o r m l y
be t r a n s v e r s e
then the coincidence
to
with
X
continuous
Y .
Μ = Μ(α,β)
is
either
full.
The n o t i o n extended
α(ς)
φα(ς)
all
Corollary
empty or
u : Μ c χ
X .
By c o m b i n i n g
If
and
£ Ε, (β ( ζ ) , β (χ) ) e Ε .
However
hence
C Μ η D[x]
open i n
χ £ Μ
(α(ζ),α(χ))
£ Ε · Ε .
transverse C/tuix)]
,
of
induced uniform
to multiple
example of
this
of u n i f o t m
spaces.
with a family
procedure.
{iTj}
π . : nx , . The u n i f o r m
Specifically
of
projections,
course,
product
let
The c a r t e s i a n p r o d u c t
s t r u c t u r e on
which each of
uous.
We r e f e r
to
uniform
product,
and w r i t e
We h a v e t o
The u n i f o r m
of
{x^}
ΠΧ^
is
be
an
be a f a m i l y
cones
equipped
where
X. .
product
structure for
situations.
structure can,
ΠΧj,
show t h a t
Πχ^
is
the coarsest
these projections with t h i s
uniform
uniform
i s uniformly structure,
contin-
as
the
IIX^ = X . such a s t r u c t u r e e x i s t s .
For
this
Induced and coinduced uniform structures p u r p o s e we i d e n t i f y lI(Xj X X j ) cartesian
X x X
with the cartesian
by t h e o b v i o u s r e a r r a n g e m e n t of product
llDj
,
where
where
is
Dj
and w h e r e j. is
all
the image of
Dj .
Thus
also uniformly
TTj
i s not
index
of
Xj
for
under
each
HD^ ,
index
number o f
j
indices
the p r o j e c t i o n
only uniformly
j
product
cartesian products
but a f i n i t e
ΠΟ^
each
the
π^ χ
continuous
but
open.
In p r a c t i c e explicit
for
for
Then
The u n i f o r m
of
through the entourages
Dj = X^ χ X^
Note t h a t just
X χ Χ .
g e n e r a t e d by t h e f a m i l y
runs
factors.
D^ c x^ χ χ^
can be r e g a r d e d as a s u b s e t of structure
product
it
is
description
seldcm n e c e s s a r y
of
one p r o c e e d s by t a k i n g
the uniform
to refer
product
a d v a n t a g e of
back t o
the
structure.
the following
Instead
characteristic
property. Proposition Let
φ : A
and
nx^
(2.8). ΓΚ^
is
tinuous if
and o n l y i f
indexing
Δ
set,
Δ
and i t
left
is
of
Δ : X -I- X X X
let
ρ
of uniform is
φ
spaces.
a uniform
space
i s uniformly
the functions
For e x a m p l e ,
follows
φ^ = π^φ
con-
: A ->- Χ^
π^
for
X^ = X
power,
a t o n c e frctn
,
take
where
(2.8)
continuous. any
j,
that
J the
for
all
is
the
diagonal
In f a c t
since
we o b t a i n frcra
(2.2)
embedding.
product i s d i s c r e t e
family. is
J*^^
i s uniformly
of d i s c r e t e uniform
X
A
Then
the uniform
a uniform
an i n f i n i t e
Let
each of
inverse
The u n i f o r m family
where
product.
obvious.
Δ : X ->- X"^
has the
that
is
nXj = x"^,
function
be a f a m i l y
continuous.
The p r o o f Then
{Xj}
be a f u n c t i o n ,
t h e uniform
i s uniformly
j.
Let
spaces but generally
Note t h a t
uniformly
be a uniform
be a p s e u d o m e t r i c
in the case
open i f
space, on
the diagonal
X.
and o n l y i f
w i t h uniform It
of
a
finite
not in the
case
function X
is
structure
discrete. Ω,
i s a simple e x e r c i s e to
and show
I.M. James that the distance if
and o n l y i f
defined that
by
ρ
Ω
p.
is
Thus
Ωρ
Ω
where
Ω^
ρ
e n t o u r a g e of
section is
with r e s p e c t
for
Ω^.
Ω.
structure
Ωρ
structure
.
of u n i f o r m
For l e t
Then t h e r e e x i s t s such t h a t
a
D
such
Clearly
Ω
is
continuous.
by t h e c o l l e c t i o n
ρ
on
and
of
previous
such t h a t
a refinement Moreover
are
sequence
D^^ = D
X
of
{D } η
Ω^,
D e Ω Ρ
such uniform
struct-
be a
As we h a v e s e e n i n t h e
a pseudcmetric
^ i s uniformly
is generated
Ω.
η = 1,2,...
there exists
continuous
pseudometrics which
to
symmetric e n t o u r a g e s
a base for
vvtence
by t h e c o l l e c t i o n
runs through a l l
symmetric
c D^
t h e uniform
t h e c o a r s e s t uniform
i s generated
continuous,
of
is
of
i s uniformly
continuous.
uniformly
0^^,02» · · ·
ρ : X χ X -v ]R
a refinement
i s uniformly
In f a c t ures
function
and s o
structures,
Ω
as
asserted. The u n i f o r m : Xj ->• Yj Yj
product i s
functorial
be a J - i n d e x e d
are uniform
spaces.
family
of
in character.
Thus
let
X^
and
f u n c t i o n s , where
Then t h e p r o d u c t
function
Πφ^ : n X j ^ IlYj i s uniformly φ^
continuous
i s uniformly
if
e a c h of
the
functions
Thus t h e p r o d u c t f u n c t i o n
and o n l y i f
each of
the functions
is
a
φ^
is
equivalence.
The p r o o f s e x c e p t for
of
the following
the l a s t w i l l be l e f t
Proposition spaces.
and o n l y i f
continuous.
uniform e q u i v a l e n c e a uniform
if
(2.9).
Let
{Xj}
results to the
(2.10).
bounded uniform
Let
spaces.
{Xj}
ΠΧ^
and
reader.
be a f a m i l y
Then t h e u n i f o r m p r o d u c t
Proposition
are straightforward
is
be a f i n i t e
of s e p a r a t e d
uniform
separated. family
Then t h e u n i f o r m p r o d u c t
of ΠΧ.
totally is
imucea ana comaucea umjorm structures totally
bounded.
Proposition uniformly nXj
is
(2.11).
uniformly
entourage
.
(Cj,rij)
If n.
uniformly
family
for
some £ d"
as
let
and n^ ,
D = JlD^
is
where
the uniform
coinduced
we f i n d
Let
and
Ζ
the
situation
φ : X ·> Y
are uniform
structure coinduced
i s uniformly
continuous
X^
.
for
Thus
X
if
is
rather
less
ψ : Y
spaces. φ
than
Ζ
is
be
functions,
that
from t h a t o f ψφ
to
straightforward.
Suppose
and o n l y i f
without
When we t u r n
the dual c a s e
and
by
structures,
c a n be d e f i n e d
structures
property required in
(2.12) .
of
η = max(nj)
structures,
and s e e k
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
basic
η = (η.) a r e p o i n t s of X 3 , since X^ i s u n i f o r m l y
t h a t induced uniform
induced uniform
Y
product
asserted.
therefore,
structures,
X,
non-empty
be a
an e n t o u r a g e
and h a v e t h e e x p e c t e d p r o p e r t i e s .
Condition
of
Then t h e u n i f o r m
D^
)
(ζ,η)
the dual q u e s t i o n ,
ψ
ζ = (ξ
so
We c o n c l u d e ,
where
example, where
connected,
and m u l t i p l e
be a f i n i t e
spaces.
e D^
and
difficulty
for
X = ΠΧ^ , j
connected,
induced
{X^}
connected.
(2.11),
of
each index
is
Let
connected uniform
To p r o v e
then
2i
Y
X.
has
Then
i s uniformly
con-
tinuous . To f u l f i l l "finest"
uniform
Consider, entourages
i n any o f
uniformly
of
this
for
t o g e t any i n s i g h t
of
the uniform
φ
structures
a uniform
At t h i s
level
i n t o the nature
of
Y
i s uniformly
s u b s e t s of
Take f i n i t e
as a b a s e for
satisfied.
which
the family
continuous.
fam i l y is
structure
therefore,
is
(2.12)
t h e c o n d i t i o n one must t r y t o g i v e
Y χ Y
on
Y
the continuous. which are
for which
Φ
intersections
of
members
structure
Y;
then
on
of g e n e r a l i t y the
it
structure.
is
hard
I.M. James For our p u r p o s e s , We s h a l l φ χ φ
however,
the general
of
the entourages
obviously
of
necessary that
Let
R
and l e t
X
D
of
X/R
X
D'
be t h e
there e x i s t s
the images,
form a b a s e
on t h e u n i f o r m
an e n t o u r a g e
for
under
a uniform
π χ IT ,
structure
with this
space
X ,
D'
such
X
if
that for
that
of
on
t h e e n t o u r a g e s of
X/R,
such t h a t
as the q u o t i e n t structure,
X
(2.12)
uniform
as the
quotient,
space.
Examples where a subspace
A
of
(2.13) X
b r e a k s down can be g i v e n by
and s e t t i n g
o b t a i n e d by c o l l a p s i n g = (1,1)
(0,e/2)
,
and
equivalent
,
e
and s o n o t t o
(l,e/2)
Definition X
entourage
is
D
to a point.
D = U,^ .
so that (e/2,1
-
(e/2, e/2)
, so that
Specifically
Then i f U^ ,
choosing
1 -
take
0 < e < i
and
(0,e/2)
s/2)
X/R
both is
belongs
does n o t be l o n g t o
to U, "2
R » U;^ R . however,
t o o weak,
(2.14). is
R = Δ υ (ΑχΑ)
belong to ,
whereas
It turns out, (2.13)
A
and t a k e
(l-e/2,1)
to
•> R ο U
space
is
surjective.
of
X/R,
in
exoimple i t
the uniform s t r u c t u r e
s t r u c t u r e and t o
e
for
Y .
L e t us s a y
to this
U
under
natural projection.
We r e f e r
(X,A)
of course;
relation
satisfied.
is
essential.
0 R 0 D' c R ο D ο R .
In t h i s c a s e
uniform
not
form a u n i f o r m s t r u c t u r e on
s h o u l d be
b e an e q u i v a l e n c e
π : X
(2.13)
is
φ
i s weakly compatible w i t h
each
is
o n l y be c o n c e r n e d w i t h s i t u a t i o n s where t h e images
T h i s d o e s n o t happen a u t o m a t i c a l l y ,
R
case
t h a t for most purposes the
and i t
i s usually replaced
The e q u i v a l e n c e r e l a t i o n
c o n p a t i b l e w i t h the uniform of
R ο D' c D » R .
X
there e x i s t s
R
structure
an e n t o u r a g e
D'
condition
by t h e
following.
on t h e
uniform
if
for
each
such
that
nduced and coinduced uniform structures This implies
(2.13),
inverses
the
with
•> R C R = D
is
D'
sufficient
basic a
stated
for
Note t h a t
is equivalent
instead
of
condition
R » D'
by
taking
to the
condition
c D " R.
t o be s a t i s f i e d
when t h e u n i f o r m
structure
Clearly
it
i n the case
of
of
X
i s g i v e n by
base. For e x a m p l e ,
where
Y
and
relation
(φχφ)
uniformly
^ΔΥ
then
π
on is
is
X
If
and X/R
open,
on
X/R
Suppose t h a t entourage entourage
of
X.
D'
R
is
has
of
uniform
with
the
space
is
r e l a t i o n on t h e
the q u o t i e n t
uniform
and u n i f o r m l y
π : X ->· X/R
is
compatible
with the
is
to a given
compatible.
Then
D'
X .
We h a v e
Let
« R c R ο d
(ιιχπ)0'[ΤΓ ( x ) D = π ( ( 0 · " Κ ) [ χ ] )
uniform
uniform
uniform structure
open.
uniformly
structure
the quotient
R
equivalence
compatible
t h e uniform
is
is
b e an e q u i v a l e n c e
with respect
compatible with
structure
R
continuous
projection
φ
projection,
Y.
Let
X .
left
Then t h e
and t h e q u o t i e n t
to
uniformly
the natural uniformly
structure
be t h e
spaces.
d e t e r m i n e d by
(2.15).
space
structure
φ : Y χ Τ -»· Y
are uniform
equivalent
Proposition uniform
let
Τ
product uniform
R
course.
condition
the
entourages,
of
on
Conversely
continuous
and
structure,
then
X
uniform
and t h e
structure. D
for
be a
some
symmeiric
symmetric
= w((R»D)[x])
= w(D[x]) for
all
X c X.
the quotient
Since
uniform
(τΓχπ)Ο'
structure
i s an e n t o u r a g e o f
this
shows t h a t
ττ
is
X/R
in
unifonrily
open. Conversely uniformlv
open,
suppose with
that
respect
π
is
uniformly
t o some u n i f o r m
continuous structure
on
and X/R,
i)
26
I. Μ. James
If
D
is
a symmetric entourage
of
X
then s i n c e
π
is
uniformly
o p e n we h a v e E[m (x) ] c: π Ο [ χ ] for
some s y m m e t r i c
entourage is
of
entourage
X/R
since
an e n t o u r a g e o f
X ,
by u n i f o r m
the
lence that
in
continuity,
the
relations
R
and
S
X/R
and s o
.
D = (wxtr)
and t h e n
(irxiTjD
is
an
On t h e
o t h e r hand i f
^E
an e n t o u r a g e
Ε =
for
forming
is
(πχπ)Ο
following
q u o t i e n t uniform
sense.
on t h e u n i f o r m
are weakly
Let
space
is
compatible, to
relation
.
This
Ε of
completes
by
As we h a v e a l r e a d y section
R
X .
of
the
structure.
(1.13)
seen,
for
entourages
In f a c t
the
For i f
S/R
sane entourage
D'
is
is
X,
equiva-
R c s, is to
. is
so
defined. X,
If,
S/R
is
then
further,
compatible
(2.13).
any u n i f o r m
space
X
the
an e q u i v a l e n c e
compatible with
any e n t o u r a g e
of
be
X/R
X/R
then
and
Ξ
respect
to
X
and
on
constitutes
relation D
to
structures
such that
compatible with
with respect X/R ,
R
X
i s weakly compatible with respect
with respect
for
then
an i n d u c e d e q u i v a l e n c e
S/R
on
of
proof.
transitive
S
Ε
Ε • Ζ
spaces.
that
of
is
be
functions,
Suppose t h a t
Y.
Then
injective
is
terminology. if
ψφ
is
the con-*
sufficiently
We s a y φ
is
that
injective
and
topology. subsets
of
topology,
space
topological
Specifically, X
spaces are
usually called
the
if
A
then the c l o s u r e
the intersection with
A
of
always
relative is
in
a subset
A
of a
the closure
of
subset of
Η
X
is
X. L e t u s now r e t u r n t o t h e u n i f o r m
uniform
space
is defined
a t o p o l o g y on
by t a k i n g
each subset D
trivial
continuous.
φ
special
in t h i s case.
A
and
a t o p o l o g i c a l embedding
the t o p o l o g i c a l Η
ψ
c a s e when
In p a r t i c u l a r , given the
Y
i n d u c e d from
has the induced
topology
the
).
are t o p o l o g i c a l
to deserve
φ : X ->- Y
(2.1
φ : X
and o n l y i f
The s p e c i a l
X
topology is
The i n d u c e d t o p o l o g y h a s t h e f o l l o w i n g
property,
where
the induced
Η
of
X,
called
the c l o s u r e X,
i s the
where
R = nD
but g e n e r a l l y
uniform
t h e uniform structure If metric
structure
is
topology
the t r i v i a l
where
Η
contains
entourages,
with
topology,
with the t r i v i a l
the
while
uniform
topology.
s t r u c t u r e on
t h e n t h e t o p o l o g y on
w i t h t h e uniform
the
associated
the d i s c r e t e
topology associated
is
of
for
subset.
the uniform
the uniform ρ
the i n t e r s e c t i o n
as a proper
For e x a m p l e , discrete
is
H,
η DCH],
Of c o u r s e
a
topology,
i n which
intersection X.
If
t h e unifor m
operator
runs through t h e e n t o u r a g e s of
R[H],
category.
X X
i s defined
by a p s e u d o -
d e t e r m i n e d by
p
toDoloav a s s o c i a t e d w i t h the uniform
coincides structure
The uniform topology d e t e r m i n e d by
ρ.
Topologically
Different t o the line
discrete
uniform
but not uniformly
structures
same t o p o l o g y . E,
33
of
w h i c h i s g e n e r a t e d by t h e f a m i l y ΔΕ υ ((α, k
which the
continuous.
cannot contain
(k+2)/2"]
establishes Perhaps
S t
c a s e when
.
η
α(η)
,
is
α
uniformly
a(n)
S
and
for
and s o
that
I assert
ε Ε [ χ ] => η ε α(ζ)
t
Hence,
special
with
= 0 .
- α (η) I < that
,
: ζ ε E^Lx]} a(x)
is
in the
t o be t h e g r e a t e s t
and
E^^ = ΔΧ ,
implies
implies
η
k/2"
D^^ = E^ • Y
such
that
unique.
at a given point
The n e i g h b o u r h o o d f i l t e r
A,
Therefore
that
i s a ccmplete
a separated complete uniform
Cauchy c o n d i t i o n filter
the
ccmplete.
φ : A
To d e f i n e follows.
on
hypothesis.
proposition
is
of
an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t
The same a r g u m e n t s h o w s , more g e n e r a l l y , ccmplete
be a Cauchy
a Cauchy f i l t e r
hence
and h e n c e a l i m i t p o i n t o f X/R
F
be an u l t r a f i l t e r
and s o a d m i t s a l i m i t p o i n t
a limit
Therefore
Let
and s o t h e t r a c e (4.7).
Since
χ N^
of
X
of
we p r o c e e d
χ
satisfies
of
on
A
φ
i s uniformly
is
as the
a Cauchy
continuous.
Completeness and completion t h e image o f
the trace
Y
is canplete
y
i s unique
is
Y
is
N e x t we show t h a t on
A.
since
φ
is
neighbourhood V e G^, ψ (x)
of
U
since
of
of
Y
x'
D
η Ν'
is
N'
of
Φ V
is
a n e i g h b o u r h o o d of
χ
in
for
φ (UnA) c V
G^
converges
sane
and so to
Ν
contained
into
ψ
on
A
y
and
Ε .
X
F.
F,
be a n y that
X that
This w i l l
establish
to
(x ,x ')
x, x ' ,
Thus f o r
any
But s i n c e
M' £ F' Φ*F
φΝ ^ Γ ί ψ ( χ ) ]
φΝ' c Γ [ ψ ( χ ' ) ] points
£ D.
respect-
Μ T F,
we h a v e t h a t
Similarly
so
of
I assert
φΜ x φΜ' c f .
the
D
such that
converging
and s o
F'.
Ε
for
ξ £ Μ η Ν
pairs
(φ(ζ·),ψ(χ·))
that
£ F ο F " F c Ε ,
required. Finally,
so
X.
(φ(ζ),ψ(χ)), in
F.
open t h e r e e x i s t members
of
of
let
an o p e n e n t o u r a g e
F •> F ° F
on
we h a v e t h a t
( ψ ( χ ) , ψ ( χ ' )) as
= y .
be a s y m m e t r i c e n t o u r a g e s u c h
by d e f i n i t i o n
(φ(ς),Φ(ς')), are a l l
χ e Α.
continuous,
be p o i n t s o f
ψ (x)
s a n e member
£ Μ'
F
into
Μ X M' ^ D
some member ς'
D
be f i l t e r s
converges to
and
If
Then
D η (AxA)
F,
such that
for
maps
X,
Since
Ψίχ)
φ ^V = U η A
Thus
There e x i s t s
So l e t
ively.
X.
i s uniformly
continuity
F'
in
and l e t
maps
the uniform
Let
ψ
φ χ φ
ψ χ ψ
is
G^
.
F ο F ο F c E. such t h a t
χ
of
'Since
c o i n c i d e s with
where
and s o
φ (UnA) c G^.
To show t h a t entourage
φ '''V
Y.
We d e f i n e
y = φ(χ),
then
on
y e Y
thus d e f i n e d ,
continuous,
= y = φ (X)
then
ψ,
y
G^
a limit point
separated.
For s u p p o s e t h a t
a neighbourhood A,
a Cauchy f i l t e r
there e x i s t s
since
61
we h a v e t o e s t a b l i s h u n i q u e n e s s .
In f a c t
if
and
I.M. James ψ'
is
a continuous extension
continuous, since
Y
then
is
Corollary
( 4 . 2 2) .
ively.
If
uniformly
Aj^
is
extension
of
respect-
equivalent
and s o
c a n be c o n s t r u c t e d
P,.^
X^, then
X^
f
: X^^
X2,
extends
by
gf
gf
= id
is
,
g : X j "*"
: X^^ -»• Xj^ id^^
is
on
·
an
X^
is
also
Similarly
equivalence,
the c o l l e c t i o n
a
while
by u n i q u e n e s s .
a uniform
to
(4.21),
continuous function
The i d e n t i t y
f
02»
If
as
asserted.
of Cauchy f i l t e r s ,
are c a l l e d m i n i m a l Cauchy f i l t e r s . as
is
the inclusion.
then
continuous function
X,
to
denote
equivalence
t o a uniformly
space
X^ ,
•
Minimal e l e m e n t s of jniform
X.
s u b s e t s of
to
Therefore
on
A,
be d e n s e
σ^^α ^α = σ^ .
.
X2
on t h e c l o s u r e of
uniform
a uniform
s u c h an e x t e n s i o n
uniformly
be s e p a r a t e d c c m p l e t e
i s uniformly
Now t h e u n i f o r m l y
necessarily
X^ ,
continuous function
extends
not
coincide
σ^ : A^ - • X ^ ( i = l , 2 )
A2
uniformly
φ,
and s o c o i n c i d e
Λ2
equivalent
α : Aj^
ψ'
Let
A^^ ,
For l e t
Eg = i d
and
Hausdorff,
s p a c e s and l e t
Oj^a ^
ψ
of
on a
These
follows.
Proposition
(4.23).
space
Then t h e r e e x i s t s o n e and o n l y o n e minimal Cauchy f i l t e r
FQ Fq
X.
on
X
Let
such that
is given
F
f
i s a refinement
by t h e s u b s e t s
through t h e e n t o u r a g e s of of
be a C a u c h y f i l t e r
DCM]
of
and
Μ
X
of F,
on t h e u n i f o r m
FG. where
A base D
for
runs
r u n s t h r o u g h t h e members
F. As i n
FG
on
Fg
is
X.
(4.16), If
Μ
of
i s D-small
then
a Cauchy f i l t e r
the proof
suppose t h a t
G i v e n an e n t o u r a g e exists
the family
D
a D - s m a l l member
subsets
D[M] g e n e r a t e s
D(;M]
X,
G
is
a Cauchy f i l t e r
X
and a member
Ν
of
G
and
coarser
Ν
filter
( D » D » D ) - s m a l l and
on
of
clearly
is
a
Μ
than
F.
refined of
meets
by
so
To c o m p l e t e F.
F
there
M,
since
Completeness and completion Ν e F,
hence
a refinement
Ν c D[MJ of
Fg
members o f
F ,
For e x a m p l e
take
given point filter
FQ
F^
it
is
is
χ
Then
and s o we Let
N^
is
X
sufficient
to use only
i s generated
F^
'G
is
is
basic
by a g i v e n
filter
base.
generated
just the
by a
neighbourhood
obtain be a u n i f o r m
space.
a m i n i m a l Cauchy f i l t e r
for
The
neighbour-
all points
χ
X.
Corollary uniform
( 4 . 2 5) .
space
interior
of
Let
X.
If
is
Μ
be a m i n i m a l Cauchy f i l t e r is
an e n t o u r a g e
an o p e n e n t o u r a g e ELMj
F
a member o f
open s i n c e
illustrates
D
Ε c D. Ε
Our n e x t r e s u l t , one of
of
If
A;
of
any
if
F
all
i s open,
Proposition relation
X
the the
of
(3.17) ,
E[M] = DLM]
and
result. (4.2U)
above,
filters.
a uniform
space
t h e m i n i m a l Cauchy
t o obtcjin
X
and
of
G
on
information
A
not
filter
is
defined F
about
fran
tlie
trace. Let
on t h e u n i f o r m
is
the
by
w h i c h c o n t a i n s members w h i c h do
then the t r a c e
the
then
whence
A
t h e manbers of
(4.26).
lence c l a s s e s Then
X
i t may be p o s s i b l e of
there e x i s t s ,
w h i c h may b e c o m p a r e d w i t h
on
A
meet
properties
then so i s
t h e u s e s of m i n i m a l Cauchy
F
a Cauchy f i l t e r
X
Μ £ F
S u p p o s e t h a t we h a v e a s u b s p a c e
meet
F
on
M.
For g i v e n
G
Therefore
minimal.
t o be t h e p r i n c i p a l X.
(4.24) .
hood f i l t e r of
F of
of
Corollary
D[MJ e G.
when t h e f i l t e r
χ
Njj
and s o
and s o
In c o n s t r u c t i n g
63
R[x]
R
space
be a c c m p a t i b l e X,
i s ccmplete.
such t h a t
equivalence e a c h of
Suppose t h a t
the
X/R
equiva-
is
ccmplete.
ccmplete.
For l e t t o some p o i n t
F
be a Cauchy f i l t e r
τιίχΐ
4 X/R .
on
I assert
X.
Then
w^F
converges
t h a t e a c h member o f
t h e minimi
I.M.James Cauchy f i l t e r G
G
trace
of
on
argue
that the
R[x]
is
d e t e r m i n e d by R[xJ
trace
Then
a limit point
of
ς
point
is
a limit
meets
is defined. converges
complete.
F
G
ζ
of
so t h a t
Assuming t h i s
t o some p o i n t is
itself,
R[x],
an a d h e r e n c e
since
G
we g o on
F
of
to
ζ e R[x],
since
point,
hence
and
i s Cauchy.
the refinement
the
Therefore
G,
and s o
X
is
complete. To p r o v e R[x]
for
t h e a s s e r t i o n we h a v e t o
each entourage
D
By c o m p a t i b i l i t y
we h a v e
E.
converges
Since
Ti
a neighbourhood member
Ν c Μ
DCN] C D[M] completes
of
The m a i n u s e ccmpletion
the uniform If,
of
for
it
Cauch^'filters
X
Ν c
X/R
uniform
of
as f o l l o w s .
i s not
the r e s u l t
space on
pairs
such subsets on
0^(1=1,2)
entourage
for
c D~^[R[x]]
the a s s e r t i o n
is
in
is some
and
so
and
is
X X,
(F,G)
D*
of
instead, in of
but
general. the
t h e same a s i f
separated
minimal
place.
l e t us consider with
the
construction
separated,
by t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n
For e a c h symmetric
structure
F.
ττ(Ε[χ])
A similar
the s e t
the following
entourage
D
of
X
X χ X
X
I assert
forms
of
uniform let
D*
o f m i n i m a l Cauchy f i l t e r s that
a base for
on the
a
X.
T h a t t h e fam i l y f o r m s a b a s e f o r For l e t
some and
minimal Cauchy f i l t e r s
space
of
of
πΝ c TI(EL'XJ)
w h i c h h a v e D - s m a l l members i n corunon.
family
for
(RoE)[x]
were used i n the f i r s t
set
Μ
(4.26).
minimal Cauchy f i l t e r s
the
in
This proves
i s followed
Given a uniform
denote
«R
D[M] m e e t s
out u s i n g o r d i n a r y Cauchy f i l t e r s
uniform
structure.
π (x)
space which a r i s e s
however,
quotient
Then
construction,
can be c a r r i e d
to
RLxJ.
t h e proof
and member
we h a v e t h a t
F.
meets
X
R o E c D * ^
Π{χ)
of
of
show t h a t
be a s y m m e t r i c
a filter
entourage
of
i s obvious X.
The
enough. inter-
Completeness and completion section
D = D^^ η D^
D-small
s u b s e t of
D* c D* η
X
as
The f i r s t
is also is
two o f
a uniform
is
a Cauchy f i l t e r
the three
structure on
are X
then
D*
is
s y m m e t r i c by
that X
G,
X,
and l e t Let
such t h a t both
completes
Ε
F,
(F,G)
Now
G,
on
is
the proof
D
of
In f a c t
such t h a t X.
and
G.
Now
H
F
(F,G)
minimality,
X
is
function
G,
i
D*
e D*
Μ u N, Η
: X - 0 .. ζ = (£/4,0)
G
take
is
is
filter
ccnrnutati-ve.
G = JR, κ Η
w i t h t h e m u l t i p l i c a t i o n g i v e n by
( x , y ) · ( x ' , y ')
where
in
satisfying
g ^Vg c W f o r
For an e x a m p l e w h e r e t h e y a r e d i f f e r e n t
Η
G
G
W .
The u n i f o r m
Take
character-
V £ Ν .
two w a y s .
the r i g h t uniform let
on
some
t o take the right r e l a t i o n s
is called
a group
Ν
are s a t i s f i e d
in e i t h e r of
relations
The o t h e r i s
group i s
W £ W then
conditions
uniform s t r u c t u r e
the s e t
the l o c a l
introduce
conditions:
if
b a s e for
through
together with a f i l t e r
(1)
sufficient
H\G .
follows.
the f o l l o w i n g
this
and
G
t h e m o s t a p p r o p r i a t e way t o
topological
algebraic sense
the l e f t
i n the group
.
g e n e r a t e d by t h e
: ix-1I < £,
|y|
< £}
With ,
η =
(£/4,£/2)
subsets
t o be
I.. James we h a v e Π.ς"^ = ( 1 , £ / 2 )
Thus t h e
left
ε U^ ,
= (1,2)
r e l a t i o n d e t e r m i n e d by
the r i g h t r e l a t i o n determined So t h e left
r i g h t uniform
uniform
ment of
of a s u b s e t
subsets
H.W ,
where
a base for
t h e members o f
r i g h t uniform the closure
structure, Η
i n t h e c a s e of
the
the
case.
so t h a t
bourhood f i l t e r of
function are
of
for
ε > 0 .
left
any
of
the
i s not a r e f i n e -
observe G
t h a t the uniform
are generated the
Similarly
with
W.H
i n the uniform left
uniform
left
topology of
e,
topology
structure
the given while
uniform Η
or
of
H.W.
η(W.H) these
the
Thus ii(H.W) in
the
topologies
t h e same i n
filter
either
W becomes t h e
is
the
neigh-
neighbourhood
C l e a r l y both the
and t h e m u l t i p l i c a t i o n
the
i s g i v e n by and
is
gAJ = Wg
g ε G.
of
In f a c t
topology
by
i n t h e c a s e of
in p l a c e
structure.
the uniform
any e l e m e n t G •» G
H
inversion
function
G χ G -·· G
continuous. Of c o u r s e t h e p r o c e d u r e
a topological
group
group s t r u c t u r e functions e
the
case,
Ν .
r i g h t uniform
In t h i s
filter
contain
W r u n s t h r o u g h t h e members of
of
coincide,
does not
not a refinement
i n t h e c a s e of
structure,
c a s e of
is
similarly
to the general
neighbourhoods of
U^
U^ .
right.
Returning
family
structure
structure,
the
by
Uj^
/
(i)
with
in which the i n v e r s i o n
-
(iv)
topology.
We may d e f i n e
space carrying
and
a
multiplication
Then t h e n e i g h b o u r h o o d f i l t e r
so that the l e f t
can be d e f i n e d ,
w i t h the uniform
reversible.
as a t o p o l o g i c a l
are continuous.
satisfies
structure
G
is
and r i g h t
and t h e o r i g i n a l However,
it
topology
i s more
of
uniform coincides
consistent
our a e n e r a l approach t o r e g a r d t h e t o p o l o g i c a l
structure
Topological groups as d e r i v e d
from t h e u n i f o r m
structure,
r a t h e r than t h e
Other
way r o u n d . The l e f t uniform
and r i g h t u n i f o r m
structures
groups.
considered
Another s t r u c t u r e
s e c t i o n of
the l e f t
fact
in the
of
t h e o r y of
some i m p o r t a n c e
and r i g h t s t r u c t u r e s ,
two-sided structure. uniform
s t r u c t u r e s are not t h e
However,
only
topological i s the
inter-
sometimes c a l l e d
t h e p r o p e r t i e s of t h e s e
s t r u c t u r e s w i l l n o t be d i s c u s s e d
in t h i s
other
book.
In
we s h a l l g e n e r a l l y c o n c e n t r a t e on t h e r i g h t u n i f o r m B e f o r e g o i n g any f u r t h e r
few e x a m p l e s .
Of c o u r s e ,
filter
structures Again,
any g r o u p
taking
g e n e r a t e d by
G
g r o u p by t a k i n g
e;
both l e f t
consisting
and r i g h t u n i f o r m s t r u c t u r e s is
t o be
and r i g h t
sense, the
uniform
discrete.
of
G
itself;
both
left
and t h e u n i f o r m
trivial.
b" ( n = 0 , 1 , . . . )
c o n s i d e r the r e a l
with the a d d i t i v e group s t r u c t u r e ,
i s the n e u t r a l element. t h e open t - b a l l s positive reals.
The u n i f o r m
Ν
topology is
are t r i v i a l
For a c o m m u t a t i v e e x a m p l e ,
structures
in the a l g e b r a i c
We t a k e
centred at zero, In t h i s c a s e
a r e t h e same, s i n c e structure
sidered e a r l i e r ,
is
just
n-space in which
W t o be t h e f i l t e r where
the l e f t
«
the group i s
topology
the
uniform
commutative.
the Euclidean structure
and t h e u n i f o r m
g e n e r a t e d bi
runs through
and r i g h t
zero
is
j u s t the
conEuclidean
topology.
For a non-commutative example, take the general linear group
Ga(nJR)
base for arouD bv
a
can be r e g a r d e d a s a t o p o l o g i c a l g r o u p by
W t o be t h e f i l t e r
topology
G,
a r e d i s c r e t e and t h e u n i f o r m
any g r o u p
structun
w i t h t h e t h e o r y l e t us c o n s i d e r
can be r e g a r d e d a s a t o p o l o g i c a l principal
the
of automorphisms o f
By choosing a.
we c a n r e p r e s e n t t h e e l e m e n t s of (nxn)-matrices , and h e n c e t o p o l o g i z e
the it a s a s u b s e t
I.M. James of
Then
η = 1
GZ ( η , Β )
t h e g r o u p c a n be i d e n t i f i e d
group of
real
and t h e
numbers.
left
Thus c o n s i d e r where
T
t h e group
is
topology of of
a uniform
entourages Wj^ =
{0
of :
T,
(i)
consists
of
t W^,
i.e.
uniform
of
space,
with
consists
ε D
(iv)
pairs
is
again,
non-commutative
distinct. illustrations.
t h e uniform
of
multiplicative
equivalences
θ : τ
structure
topology, the
the subsets
i.e.
Τ, of
the
neighbourhood W^,
for
all
topological
of
for
group s t r u c t u r e s
R = R,,
e l e m e n t s of
(ψφ"^(t),t)
e D
just
e Τ} .
relation
(Φ,Ψ)
all
arises
self-equivalences
G for
such
that
all
t,
Thus t h e
left
rather
of
uniform
we form
are
determined
structure
the if
e D
s.
the uniform
but in g e n e r a l
The same s i t u a t i o n
topological
for
such t h a t
structure
are
a base for
Vt
The r i g h t
(ψ(s),φ(s))
convergence not.
structures
When
where
-
readily verified.
the
the group i s
G of u n i f o r m
(e(t) ,t)
The c o n d i t i o n s
,
In t h e a s s o c i a t e d
identity
D
such that
η a 2
uniform convergence,
the
with
p r o v i d e some i n t e r e s t i n g
uniform convergence.
filter
When
and r i g h t u n i f o r m
Function-spaces
Wj^
becomes a t o p o l o g i c a l group.
G
by
i.e.
right uniform structure
from t h e
than uniform
is
group
self-
equivalences . For a n o t h e r bijections Regarding uniform
Τ
: Τ
i.e.
T,
consider
where
Τ
is
as a d i s c r e t e uniform
structure
topology, for
0
illustration
of
an i n f i n i t e
t h e t o p o l o g y of p o i n t w i s e filter
of
the
subsets : θ (t)
= t V t ε S)
,
G
In t h e
convergence,
identity
of
set.
space l e t us g i v e
pointwise convergence.
the neighbourhood
Wg = {Θ
the group
G
the
associated a base
c o n s i s t s of
the
Topological groups where
S
runs through the f i n i t e
conditions
for
verified.
a topological
The l e f t
of
T.
Again
group structure
are
readily
relation
subsets
L = L
d e t e r m i n e d by
W_
WG
consists (t) all
of p a i r s = t
for
t e S.
uniform
(Φ ,ψ)
t € S,
i.e.
Thus t h e
left
uniform
The c l a s s
of
of
pointwise
invariant
neighbourhoods. group i f
neighbourhoods fact
it
is
V
since
V
if
Obviously a l l
the group
R* Κ R
groups s i n c e
for
the
left
and
interest.
they admit
a topological
small
group
G
admits a base c o n s i s t i n g
^ = V
for
all
U
of
gVg ^ c U
the conjugates
for
gVg ^
g t G . Ν
In
there
all
of
exists
g e G ,
for
all
g e G
condition.
abelian groups are
groups with d i s c r e t e
just
which the
e a c h member
such t h a t
the previous
is
= φ(t)
i s of c o n s i d e r a b l e
Ν
gVg
for
that
ψ(t)
structure
Specifically
such t h a t
t h e n t h e u n i o n of
fulfills
such t h a t
SIN
and o n l y i f
sufficient
a neighbourhood
these
such
convergence.
structures coincide
[ 2 1 ] we c a l l
SIN
G
t o p o l o g i c a l groups for
Following
i s an
S
e l e m e n t s of
all
structure
r i g h t uniform
of
the
or t r i v i a l
considered
SIN
groups,
topology.
earlier
as
are
On t h e o t h e r
i s n o t an SIN
hand
group.
We h a v e Proposition group,
(5.2).
Let
G
in the r i g h t uniform
be a t o t a l l y bounded structure.
Then
topological
G
is
an
SIN
group. For l e t V.V.V"^ c υ have
U ί .
V.S = G
By ( i v ) where
of
be g i v e n
Since for
(5.1)
g £ V.g^
is
and l e t
V c Ν
t o t a l l y bounded,
seme f i n i t e
we h a v e
j = 1 , . . . ,n
we h a v e
G
,
subset
gj.W^.g^"^
c ν
for
Then i f
W = W^^ η . . .
for
some
and
gW.g"^ c V . g j . W . g " ^ c
such
so
V.V.V"^ c U ,
that
on t h e r i g h t ,
S = {g^^ , . . .
.
j
he
seme η W^
of
we G .
W^ e W , and
g £ G
76
LM. James
as r e q u i r e d .
It follows,
bounded on t h e r i g h t and v i c e v e r s a ; Returning
it
then is
left
v i o u s l y a uniform
is
right p^
e
g ^Vg c W.
say that let
Thus
V
likewise
ρ
a uniform
equivalence since
be a
right
to the
left
The i n v e r s i o n
with
it
by
W
of
is
e
any
such
and s o
ρ
is
(p ) ^ = Ρ
.
equivalences and c l e a r l y
to the r i g h t uniform
between
G
the
left
uniform
structure.
with
the
same
structure.
on t h e o t h e r h a n d ,
with
both
g'
structure,
function,
Therefore
is
a uniform
structure
Some of
the
and
uniformly
in the e a r l i e r
are two-sided,
in the sense
that
has the p r o p e r t y
respect
left
structure
to the
uniform
if
G
then
G
t o the
r i g h t uniform s t r u c t u r e ,
versa.
if
is
For e x a m p l e ,
G
or t o t a l l y bounded w i t h r e s p e c t
with respect So f a r
t o the r i g h t uniform
being used.
to specify
The same i s
uniform
connected
structure,
are concerned,
which of
uniformly
to the l e f t
a l s o separated, uniformly
as these properties
unnecessary
separated,
sections
a l s o has
property with respect
is
is
continuous,
continuous,
uniform
t h e r i g h t uniform
G
ob-
the
i n v a r i a n t p r o p e r t i e s we h a v e c o n s i d e r e d
then
is
are
translation where
t r a n s l a t i o n s a r e uniform
is true with respect
G
topological
^
and r i g h t
equivalence
bounded.
a l s o a uniform
a neighbourhood
^ respect
totally
translation
g
left
is
left,
Although
is
i s uniformly
i s uniformly
totally
the entourages
(p^xp^) is
p^
G
translation.
denotes
and
is
G
Left
translation
we h a v e L·^ c
n e i g h b o u r h o o d of
to
since
to l e f t
G
t o t a l l y bounded on t h e
theory,
equivalence,
For i f
g e G
that if
uniform s t r u c t u r e .
so obvious,
equivalence.
that
G
sufficient
invariant with respect
element
course,
to the general
group with t h e
not quite
of
with the
and
vice
connected structure,
or t o t a l l y
and v i c e
therefore,
bounded
versa. it
is
t h e two u n i f o r m s t r u c t u r e s
t r u e of
any s e l f - i n v e r s e
subspace
is of
Topological groups a topological
group.
For what i s properties
of uniform
topological that
groups.
that
for
G
Ce ).
that F
for
t o be t o t a l l y a finite
The c o n d i t i o n
for
each
F
W of
Proposition of
of
group
G.
since
Η
for
F
as
F
left
respect
is
a filter
Cauchy i f
t o the l e f t
course,
H.K
F
subset
There
the group
H.K
of
corresponding
is
totally
e
in
G.
S.K
of
is
Then
totally
using
subset
a finite
bounded.
H.K,
subsets
bounded.
S unior
Therefore
and h e n c e
bounded,
group
G
as
asserted.
we d e s c r i b e
t h e Cauchy c o n d i t i o n
with
and we u s e t h e term when
G
are both l e f t
however,
as the
bounded
is
totally
structure,
filters
G
Μ
some f i n i t e
i s no d i f f e r e n c e
In g e n e r a l ,
is
g e n e r a t e d by t h e
Now
Τ
satisfies
uniform
distinguished
Consider
and s o i s
for
on t h e t o p o l o g i c a l
and c o n v e r g e n t
i n any c a s e . carefully
Then
bounded.
totally
Thus
Ν
W.Ξ = G.
a member
be t o t a l l y
is
some f i n i t e
Cauchy s i m i l a r l y . of
Κ
Η < Κ
φ : Η Κ Κ
G
hk
The c o n d i t i o n
for
Φ
t o be i n j e c t i v e
the condition
for
Φ
t o be s u r j e c t i v e
internal to
is given
by
conjugais
by
(heH,k£K). is
that is
that
the
be a normal
Η
=
the
Η η Κ =
(e);
H.K = G.
Topological groups When b o t h t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s and we r e g a r d and
K.
β : Κ
G
Note t h a t H\G
is
G
continuous,
the pair
open.
case
In t h a t
and a u n i f o r m
G
is
and
Η
K.
continuous.
isomorphism,
if
since G.
U
Κ Κ
consisting
of
The a c t i o n of
φ
K.
is
defined
are
acceptable
if
e m b e d d i n g when
is
Η
G/K
is (H,K)
is
topological
"'"^(αυ)
the equivalence
(e)
isomorphism
the pair
then
also
Urider
a topological
and h e n c e a
case.
Μ η Κ =
in addition.
that
and
i n any Φ
a : Η
II
as a t o p o -
i s continuous,
the semidirect
G
is
pairs
(x,0)
(x,y)
β
= U.K
w i l l be d i s -
Next l e t
pairs
(H,K)
isomorphic
(x,y)
(l,y)
quotient
condition
colleagues,
was t h o r o u g h l y
while
Κ
(I,χ
in this Η * Κ ,
subgroup is
the
χ = 1.
^y) .
It
case, moreover
spaces to right
was i n t r o d u c e d .
investigated
and we a d o p t t h e i r
the
Η
G/K.
who u s e d t h e t e r m " p r e s q u e i n v a r i a n t " the c o n d i t i o n
is
such t h a t
into
isomorphic to to
Η
y = 0
are a c c e p t a b l e ,
u s t u r n from l e f t
The f o l l o w i n g
i s p r o v i d e d by t h e
Here
such t h a t
transforms
topologically
topologically
product
considered e a r l i e r .
easy to see that
spaces.
Η Κ Κ
open in
normal subgroup c o n s i s t i n g of
is
and
action
open,
of
Η
bijection
s e n s e and t h e
assuming
is
and a
Η
later.
G =
and s o
of
H.K = G
is
The s t a t u s
An e x a m p l e o f
is
G/K
The i s o m o r p h i s m
«
isomorphism
Then
we o b t a i n
Still
an
group.
a uniform
therefore,
that
group
(H,K)
Φ
a c c e p t a b l e we f i n d
cussed
so t h a t
e q u i v a l e n c e when
these conditions,
IS o p e n i n
: Η
a topological
The homomorphism
Let us say t h a t
obviously
α
in the t o p o l o g i c a l
l o g i c a l group.
between
is
is
s e m i d i r e c t product of
an i s o m o r p h i s m
that
are subgroups
Η " Κ + Κ
(internal)
Φ
a r e g i v e n by t h e i n c l u s i o n s
Now s u p p o s e Κ
as the
are s a t i s f i e d
term
quotient
by P o n c e t
Subsequently,
[20^
horfever ,
by R o e l c k e [ 2 1 ] and
"neutral"
instead.
his
. . James Definition
(5.9).
is
in
neutral
there e x i s t s V.H c H.U
The s u b g r o u p
G
if
for
For
(5.10).
let
U
for
of
G
e
such
group in
G
G
that
may be s u b s t i t u t e d
Let
totally
condition,
Η
G.
Then
Η
b o u n d e d we h a v e of
is
g^W^ c V . g ^
.
S.W c V . S
By ( i v )
of
for of
Consider and
the
in
in
(5.1)
G .
G .
Then Since
of
e
intersection
Η
subset
there e x i s t s ,
W^
of
G.
some f i n i t e
a neighbourhood
normal
bounded s u b g r o u p
e
e
for
subgroups.
neutral in
of
Η c v.S
Η .
g^ £ S ,
V
Obviously
a s do open
be a t o t a l l y
some n e i g h b o u r h o o d
each element
in
for
G
such
W = W^^ π . . .
η W^ .
so
H.W c V . S . W • Β
B'
Β χ Τ
with projection
ρ ^(B')
restriction
a subspace
with
with the quotient
preimage ΧβIί
of
space
itself,
equicontinuously
space over
Thus
product
for
through uniform e q u i v a l e n c e s ,
the
notation.
the uniform Β
together
called
space over
space over
topological
regarded
sufficient
Also
X
ρ : X -»· Β,
as a uniform
can b e r e g a r d e d a s a u n i f o r m space
is
space
B.
function,
of
Β Thus
let
where
B'
is
a
u mjorm spaces over a oase iniform
space.
form s p a c e space of (b',x)
Then t o e a c h u n i f o r m
λ*Χ
over
the uniform such t h a t
g i v e n by
B'
p'(b',x)
to
B' If
of
X
X
is
= b'
.
A
is
Β
is of
B'
c Β
with
a
uni-
the subpairs p'
λ
with the r e s t r i c t i o n
is
the
in-
X^,
of
space over
Β
and
A
X
if
Note
fibrewise
Xj^
is
that if
Β
is
λ*Χ,
a subset
by
restricting
We d e s c r i b e
the c l o s u r e
A
dense in
is
of
fibrewise where
A
Aj^
for
d e n s e in
λ : Β'
Β
X is
above. {Xj }
fibrewise
the uniform
with
is
uniform
coordinates
a family
of uniform
product
Π^Χ^
product
lie
JIX^
spaces over
i s defined
consisting
i n t h e Scime f i b r e .
of
Β
t o be the points
Thus
the
Π^Χ^
subspace
all
of
comes
whose
equipped
projections ..
: Π3Χ.
X.
which are u n i f o r m l y
continuous
the pull-back
of
λ*Χ
respect to a uniformly identified
with
space over
Β
B'
where
special
base which are important
over X
is
B.
over
function B'
Note Β
λ : B'
that
with Β
can be
r e g a r d e d a s a uniform
λ. classes
of uniform
i n our t h e o r y .
i s uniformly
which the p r o j e c t i o n In [ l l J
space
continuous
with projection
which the p r o j e c t i o n
functions
a uniform
>4„ X,
There are s e v e r a l
1.
consisting
and t h e p r o j e c t i o n .
dense^ i n b e B.
λ*Α
If
for
λ*X
as a uniform space o v e r
structure
each point
of
where
over
and t h e p r o j e c t i o n
In c a s e λ*Χ
a uniform
we r e g a r d
as fibrewise
as
χ X
X
.
the uniform
then
B'
= p(x)
c l u s i o n we may i d e n t i f y X
is defined,
product
\(b')
space
open.
One i s Another
i s a l o c a l uniform
d e n s e a l w a y s means f i b r e w i s e
spaces over a the c l a s s i s the
equivalence.
dense.
for
class Note
I.M.James that
if
the uniform
space
so does the pull-back Β
and u n i f o m i l y
Proposition
D
of
X
p"^(E[b])
is
ζ
B'
X
open i f
C
all
c ρΟ[ς]
for
all
to
loss
Then i f
and s o
and t h e n
ξ £ DtxJ
for
over a base.
χ
£ D[Xg]
.
so that
over
X
have the o r i g i n a l
.
choose
that
So i f
β £ E[b]
η £ 0[ζ]
χ χ
.
Then
as
property
property
if
in Section
Definition
(7.2). all
Β Also B.
is
for
1.
For
The u n i f o r m the fibres
of
for
is
that
seme ζ £ X^ ,
an o b v i o u s way spaces
t h e uniform
space
the fibres
of
procedure i s
Section
4 is
invariant
too
concerned properties
example space
X
X
separated.
always separated, Β X Τ
entourages
of uniform
this
the uniformly
the
for
is
all
Although
satisfied.
required.
there
we may s a y t h a t
is
we h a v e
£ Οίζ]
w h e r e t h e Cauchy t h e o r y o f satisfactory
e X^
,
spaces
fibrewise
property.
considered
sDace o v e r
that
so
condition
and
Hence
has the f i b r e w i s e
simplistic
itself.
D ,
seme
β £ pD[xJ
Specifically
X
Thus
entourage
Then we can
we may a s s u m e t h a t
β £ E[b]
a corresponding
if
B.
for each such
open.
the stated
Given a p r o p e r t y of uniform
is quite
Β
ξ e Xg
b = ρ(η)
of g e n e r a l i t y
b £ Εϋβ]
separated
of
symmetric and
suppose that
are symmetric.
it
We p r o v e
space over if
space
required.
Conversely,
Β
Β .
and o n l y Ε
then
e v e r y uniform
λ : Β'
i s uniformly
β £ Β
and s o
as
Without r e a l
ρ
for
property
b c Β .
in relation
b £ Ε[β]
£ 0[η],,
that
,
be a u n i f o r m
uniformly
for
has e i t h e r
function
an e n t o u r a g e
Ε ,
to define
Β
there e x i s t s
symmetric
then
Let
over over
continuous
For s u p p o s e
Ε[β]
λ*X
(7.1).
The p r o j e c t i o n
X
fibrewise
each separated
are
over
Β
as a uniform separated, uniform
is
space
fibrewise
over
as a uniform
space
T.
We p r o v e
u mjorm spaces over a oase Proposition
(7.3).
Suppose t h a t Then
X
Β
is
R
is
R
Since
X
is
X XgX
is
just
of
B. is
Since the just
the diagonal as
ΔΧ
space over fibrewise
Β .
separated.
t h e e n t o u r a g e s of the i n t e r s e c t i o n
latter
reduces
to the
product
hence
R
of diagonal
X x„X . ΰ
t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n of
ΛΧ,
X.
itself
R
with
reduces
to
required.
is closed
t h e s i t u a t i o n when Proposition
of
the f i b r e w i s e
separated
It is easy to see
uniform
is
i n t h e p r e i m a g e of
fibrewise
the diagonal,
uniformly
X
be t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n
the preimage
only if
be a uniform
s e p a r a t e d and
contained
the entourages ΔΒ,
is
X
separated.
For l e t Then
Let
101
that in
ΔΧ
(7.4).
X X x^X
is
Let
if
fibrewise
.
separated
Our n e x t r e s u l t
if
and
concerns
open. X
be a uniform
open p r o j e c t i o n .
equivalence
is
space over
Then t h e p r o j e c t i o n
and o n l y i f
the diagonal
D
is a
with
local
function
Δ : X Η- X XgX i s uniformly
open.
For s u p p o s e X
admits a base of
tne p r o j e c t i o n (D[x]
for
all
X
χ e X Δ
required.
If η
X £ X ,
D
is
(X XjjX)
equivalence.
Then
Δ
a basic
entourage
then
C ADCXJ
i s uniformly
i s uniformly
there e x i s t s
all
i s a l o c a l uniform
symmetric entourages which are transverse
and s o
(E[x] X E[x]) for
ρ
ρ .
X D[x])
suppose that of
that
open.
open.
If
a symmetric e n t o u r a g e
D
Conversely i s any
Ε
of
X
entourage such
η (X ΧβΧ) c Δ Ο [ χ ] and t h e n
Ε
is
transversa to
ρ ,
as
that
to
102
. James
Definition
(7.5).
wise t o t a l l y Thus
Β
The u n i f o r m
bounded i f is
always
space over i t s e l f .
space over
Again i f
is
formly wise
fibrewise
Proposition
X
over
of
X
totally
Β χ Τ B,
is
bounded, (7.6).
on a u n i f o r m
as a uniform Let
X
uniformly
open p r o j e c t i o n .
and t h a t
X
is
fibrewise
space
bounded.
as a u n i f o r m
totally
bounded,
X
then
X
X/G .
Β
bounded.
is
uni-
is
fibre-
We p r o v e
space over
that
T.
group a c t i n g
over
be a u n i f o r m
totally
fibre-
t o t a l l y bounded s p a c e
space
Suppose
is
bounded,
fibrewise
for each
Β
are t o t a l l y
a t o t a l l y bounded t o p o l o g i c a l
equicontinuously
totally
the f i b r e s
Also
as a uniform G
all
space
B,
with
totally
bounded
Then
X
is
totally
and l e t
Ε
be a s y m m e t r i c
for
b ε Β
and
subset
S
bounded. For l e t
D
b e any e n t o u r a g e o f
Β
such that
entourage
of
Since
Β
is
of
X
such t h a t
finite
number o f
totally
each fibre
is
subset
of
then
Τ
and s o Thus
fibres.
totally X
p(s) (5,t)
bounded,
for
some
= ρ(ς)
for
for
D c D[T] = X ,
(2.15),
some
uniformly
(7.7).
if
some
and s o
t ε T,
the union of
exists
.
ξ ε D[x],
a special
all
is
t o t a l l y bounded,
p~^pS c D [ T ]
The u n i f o r m
connected
ρ ^pS
s ε S,
all
a finite
and s o t h e r e
which proves
is essentially
Definition
Now
The u n i o n i s
such that
ε D
- pDLxJ
bounded t h e r e e x i s t s
Β = E[pS].
b e E[p(s)]
therefore
E[bJ
X,
ρ(s)
a
since
finite
So i f
x e
ε E[b] c pD[x],
hence
therefore (7.6).
a
χ ε Χ^^.
ξ ε ρ
^p(s)
χ ε D » D[TJ
Our e a r l i e r
.
result,
case. space
the fibres
X of
over X
are
Β
is
fibrewise
unifonnly
connected. Thus
Β
is
always fibrewise
self.
Also
Β >· Τ
uniform
space over
is B,
fibrewise for
uniformly
connected over
uniformly
connected,
each uniformly
connected
it-
as a
uniform
orm spaces over a ase space
Τ .
Again i f
G
group a c t i n g uniformly then
X
is
over
X/G .
fibrewise
is
equicontinuously uniformly
(7.8).
Let
X
uniformly
open p r o j e c t i o n .
connected
and t h a t
i s uniformly For l e t
X
is
on a u n i f o r m
connected,
be a uniform Suppose
space
as a uniform
fibrewise
space over
that
Β
is
uniformly
D
X
space
3,
with
uniformly
connected.
be any s y m m e t r i c e n t o u r a g e o f
b e B.
of
Let
Β
ζ,η
such
that
e X .
Then
connected.
chain to a point
ρ(ξ)
e Β ,
I assert
x^ £ Xj^
,
that
where
ζ
X,
and l e t
ECb] ^ pOLXj^J
Then
can be j o i n e d by an E - c h a i n uniformly
topological
connected.
be a s y m m e t r i c e n t o u r a g e each point
connected
We p r o v e
Proposition
X
a uniformly
and
since
Ε
for
ρ(η) Β
is
can be j o i n e d by a D-
i = l,...,n
.
This
is
i trivial true
for
for
some
(Xj^jX^^j^) ξ
1 = 1 ;
e D
make t h e
i < η . for
inductive
Then
hypothesis
£ E [ b ^ ] c poLxj^J
some
^ ^b.
'
n' X,
it
and
^^ r e q u i r e d .
can b e j o i n e d by a D - c h a i n t o some p o i n t
then since
that
η' £
is
so Thus
b
,
η
and
c a n be j o i n e d t o η by a D - c n a i n ( i n Xj^ i s uniformly connected. Thus ζ can be j o i n e d
to
η η
by a D - c h a i n a s r e q u i r e d .
(2.17),
is
essentially
a special
We s e e , t l i e r e f o r e , t h a t over a base properties point.
c a n be d e f i n e d of
This
uniform
t h e t h e o r y by
proposition uniformly
(7.9).
result,
case.
fibrewise
properties
which reduce
to the
of
uniform
a s we s h a l l
however, see.
is
spaces
corresponding
s p a c e s when t h e b a s e s p a c e r e d u c e s
simple procedure,
t h e Cauchy t h e o r y , of
Our e a r l i e r
inadequate
We b e g i n our
to a
for
discussion
proving Let
open p r o j e c t i o n .
X
be a u n i f o r m Let
F
space over
B,
be a Cauchy f i l t e r
with on
X
I.M. James such t h a t
p^F
member o f that
converges
trace
For
let
of
G
D
on
for
converges
we h a v e
to
b
and t h e n
Xj^ .
Since
G
runs
through
the
sufficiently
is
such
if
for
itself
X . Ε
By
of
Xj^ ,
for
so
F,
we
have
Since
p^F
sufficiently Thus
by t h e s e t s X
(7.1)
Β .
c D[Xj^] .
of
meets
D"^CM]
D ^[M],
and
Μ
runs
this
proves
small meets
where
through
0
the
the r e s u l t .
i s m i n i m a l Cauchy t h e n t h e
The u n i f o r m
each point converges
that
space
b ε Β to
b
this
reduces
X
over
In
trace
Β
is
of
F
fibrewise
and C a u c h y f i l t e r
,
F
itself
to completeness
Β
is
a point-space.
complete,
as
a uniform
fibrewise
complete
F
converges
on
to
X
some
uniform
in
Moreover
space spaces
over
the
Β
ordinary
is
itself.
always
fibre-
Pull-baclcs
over a base
are
also
of
fibre-
complete. We h a v e
at
once
Proposition
(7.11).
Let
space
Β .
Β
over When
uniform we
F
X ε Xj^ .
s e n s e when
wise
F
p,F
Note
wise
entourages
(7.10)·
that
point
if
of
pM c ECb]
generated
of
every
defined.
some e n t o u r a g e
Μ c p"^(E[b]) is
G
Then
defined,
Definition complete
is
s m a l l members o f
particular, X. b
Xj^
b e any e n t o u r a g e
ρ ^ E [ b ] • Y
over
To d e f i n e procedure
ψ ,
as for
separated,
entourages
complete
over
is
uni-
χ ε X . group
space
Then
X.
acting X
X/G .
X
be a u n i f o r m
d e n s e s u b s e t of
space over
X .
such that
continuous
Y
Β
Y
and
be a
space over function
Β
over
continuous
B.
function
ψ|Α = φ .
as a f u n c t i o n , the ordinary
Let
complete uniform
be a u n i f o r m l y
S i n c e we a r e o n l y a s s u m i n g
the
topological
o n e and o n l y o n e u n i f o r m l y Β
of
each point
on t h e u n i f o r m
separated fibrewise φ : A
complete.
the projection
Corollary
(7.15).
Further-
space.
c o m p l e t e for
Proposition
Τ .
with projection a
fibrewise
is
complete over
proves
fibrewise
space Β
point
Hence
which is
be the i n t e r s e c t i o n
R[x]
fibrewise
,
fibrewise
also
is
χ
th
point
an a d h e r e n c e
Β χ Τ
space over
then
R
t o some
point since
that
of
The
is
converges to
filter Xj^
(7.9).
χ
as we h a v e s e e n i n S e c t i o n
open,
by
on
Then
uniform
the separated quotient For,
The t r a c e
e v e r y c o m p l e t e uniform
Let
space
be a Cauchy
and s o c o n v e r g e s
also
equivalence
the uniform ,
is defined,
of
b .
is complete.
over
l o c a l uniform
of
G
In p a r t i c u l a r we s e e
more,
Corollary
F
F
to
and s o a l i m i t
the refinement
and l e t
converges
a l s o a Cauchy f i l t e r
X e Xj^ , of
Β
vje u s e e s s e n t i a l l y
e x t e n s i o n theorem t o be f i b r e w i s e
we o n l y h a v e u n i q u e n e s s
of
limits
t h e same
(4.21)
above.
separated,
not
for convergent
filter
106
ι.Μ. James
in a restricted q^H
sense.
converges
converge that
thus
defined
be any e n t o u r a g e
D
that
of
assert
such
Since
on D
A is
Μ X Ν C D
open
and s o
ilarly
φΝ c Γ [ ψ ( η ) J
we h a v e
that
all
D
into of
X)
the
cannot
Yj^ .
To
on
Then
on
Ε
entourage entourage
(• X„ υ
can
function
and t h e n e x t e n d e d
is
is
t o a uniformly
is in
f i b r e w i s e d e n s e in X„ and (λ*Χ),'^, ij , ij
complete.
So we can u s e
to construct
the canonical
of
i
the
identity
that
a uniform
separated
to
ijj'j
and o b t a i n
ψ
fibrewise
ψ
.
Now
and
a uniformly
function ψ'ψ
on
ψ'
equivalence
fibrewise
the
λ*(1Χ)
.
is
B'
.
λ *X , identity We
are mutually
over
completion
is
for
inverse,
Thus
natural
the
with
pull-backs.
In t h e c o u r s e o f
this
section,
observed,
we h a v e made c o m p a r a t i v e l y
structure
of
possible
ρμ = λ ρ '
function
continuous
and f i b r e w i s e
the pull-back
(7.15)
respect
Β
(X*X)g,
i|j'jX*X
apply
continuous,
function
:
B'
where
respect
X*Xg
separated
continuous
over
with
space over
such t h a t
the canonical
Β'
the
φ.
a uniform
i n t h e same way a s b e f o r e ,
Ψ'
of
as
function
fibrewise
(7.15),
φ^
be u n i f o r m l y
over B' . On t h e o t h e r hand λ*(1Χ) λ * ( Χ „ϋ) , since iX i s f i b r e w i s e dense is
to
comes e q u i p p e d w i t h a uniformly
be p u l l e d back t o a u n i f o r m l y φ : λ*Χ -»• λ*Χ,, D
We r e f e r
t h e q u e s t i o n of n a t u r a l i t y
Let
the pull-back
1 uy
the base space.
to develop a similar
a s t h e r e a d e r may h a v e little
This s u g g e s t s theory for
u s e of that
uniform
the
uniform
i t m i g h t be spaces
over
1 ιυ
I.m.jamex
a topological
base
For a c o m p l e t e l y
space,
satisfactory
to proceed to a further are
(in a c e r t a i n
vertically. studied
sense)
These are
stage
has b e e n done i n
theory,
however,
it
is
the fibrewise III
of
horizontally
mentioned.
necessary
uniform
spaces
[11 1.
The r e s u l t s
The work o f Hunt [ 6 ] on u n i f o r m
which
and u n i f o r m
s e c t i o n may s e r v e a s an i n t r o d u c t i o n
general r e s u l t s .
L 8 J.
and c o n s i d e r h y b r i d o b j e c t s
topological
i n [ 9 ] and i n C h a p t e r
in the p r e s e n t
i l s o be
and t h i s
I have given
to these spreads
more
should
8.
Uniform covering spaces
I a s s u m e t h e r e a d e r t o be f a m i l i a r t h e o r y of c o v e r i n g Godbillon [5]
or
spaces in the t o p o l o g i c a l
fully that
of
covering
group, which
theory
there
of
o f c o v e r i n g map.
In t h e uniform
we n e e d t o s t r e n g t h e n lence in a similar
stronger condition
for 1.
R
[22].
This
section
suggests
equivalence
I give
and
l o c a l uniform
that find
equiva-
and c o m p a t i b l e . still.
r e l a t i o n or
2 we h a v e d e f i n e d
the
the
terms
What we now n e e d i s a
Let us say t h a t t o the uniform
R
is
structure,
strongly if
there
the
case,
that
R » D = D » R
each symmetric b a s i c entourage
D .
The a p p r o a c h a d o p t e d by L u b k i n [ 1 5 ]
This i s is
an
difference
t h e o r y we c a n e x p e c t t c of
of
.
an e s s e n t i a l
b e an e q u i v a l e n c e
In S e c t i o n
with respect
a base such
is
[16]
d e a l t w i t h more
the f i n a l
topological
the d e f i n i t i o n
let
X .
weakly compatible
(8.1)
is
fashion.
To s t a r t w i t h , uniform space
local
in
i n Massey
t h e form w h i c h s u c h a t h e o r y m i g h t t a k e ^
between the notion
exists
as
t o d e v e l o p a uniform v e r s i o n
s p a c e and i n
In the t o p o l o g i c a l
compatible,
sense,
t h e c a s e where t h e
[ 3 ] but see a l s o Taylor
ought t o be p o s s i b l e
the notion of outline
the theory concerns
a topological
in Chevalley it
classical
( w i t h some t e c h n i c a l d i f f e r e n c e s )
An i m p o r t a n t b r a n c h o f base space i s
with the
unrelated.
112
ι.Μ. James
for
example,
action
of
if
Β
over
alence
Β
discrete
Proposition
is
just
Β
Now
and l e t
D ·
D
pD[x]
is
X £ X .
In f a c t
entourage
of
injective
(ξ,η)
Β
if
D[x]
open.
s
:
ECb]
a uniform
X
(6.6)
strong
D[x]
onto ρ
to the p a r t i a l
(X
e χ
)
each
on
equithe
and our o b s e r v a t i o n
that
t o show t h a t is
a covering
of
X
p{x), Ε =
where ρ .
E[p(x)],
maps
for
uniformly
be a uniform
of
to
map.
X/G.
• Β of
X
X ,
space over
X
let
φ:Χ-«·Υ,
be t h e p r o j e c t i o n s .
which s a t i s f i e s
(φχφ)Ο
is
(8.1)
an e n t o u r a g e o f
respect to
S = (qxq)~^A,
For e x a m p l e l e t equicontinuously the uniform
space
see that
X/H
subgroup
Η
is of
q:Y->B
G
with respect Y
D
which s a t i s f i e s
R = (pxp) (8.1)
then
with
uniformly
properly discontinuously
By c o m b i n i n g
^Δ
transversality.
be a d i s c r e t e g r o u p a c t i n g
on
t h e l a s t two r e s u l t s we
a u n i f o r m c o v e r i n g s p a c e of G .
i s an e n t o u r a g e
to
and s i m i l a r l y w i t h
and u n i f o r m l y X .
If
and
X/G
for
each
I.M.James For t h e r e m a i n d e r
of
this
s e c t i o n we work a l m o s t
i n t h e c a t e g o r y of u n i f o r m s p a c e s o v e r a uniform If
X
is
a uniform
a uniform
covering
space over s p a c e of
unifotm
self-equivalences
uniform
covering
which
t h e y form
(8.2).
(8.4).
and
g^
agree at
φ = g^
connected.
Let
X
Β .
D
transformation
properly
X
i s uniformly
as
required.
ρ .
Let
such t h a t
X ,
: X -«• X
Let
i s uniformly
X
£ D
for
since
are uniformly
be a u n i f o r m
locally
by
such
connected.
that
moreover X ,
G ,
by
(2.7) ,
in t h i s
connected
case,
uniform
the uniform
Poincar^
transverse
be a uniform
c o n n e c t e d we o b t a i n from
(8.5).
,
g £ G
which i s
X
by t r a n s v e r s a l i t y ,
φ , id
X/G
discontinuous.
φ : X
(φ (χ) , χ )
dis-
.
be a u n i f o r m l y
properly
the
transformation,
throughout
Therefore
b e an e n t o u r a g e o f
= X ,
the functions
X
χ
Then t h e a c t i o n of
i s uniformly
to the p r o j e c t i o n
Β
and u n i f o r m l y
the uniform Poincare group
For l e t
where
Suppose t h a t
and t h e n c h o o s e an e l e m e n t
Consequently
s p a c e of
Proposition
X .
covering
precisely
φ(χ)
space
X .
self-equivalences
a uniform
uniformly
Then
be a g r o u p o f u n i f o r m
the
group
P o i n c a r e g r o u p of
is
φ
is
called
and t h e d i s c r e t e
X
is
group of
X
φ : X
Then
X
These are
c o v e r i n g s p a c e of
since
covering
of
Β .
a uniform
·
Proposition
over
equicontinuous
πφ = TT ^ i r g ^
is
X ,
connected uniform
χ e X
B.
we s h a l l n e e d t o c o n s i d e r
is
.
X
if
X
If
- x.g
and p a r t i c u l a r l y
t h e uniform
G
base space
so that
choose a point φ(x)
let
uniformly
continuous,
of
i s called
the uniformly
action is
Β ,
transformation s
For e x a m p l e , of
Β ,
entirely
covering
some p o i n t ρφ = ρ . continuous
(2.7)
that
χ £ X . Since and
since
φ = id
c o v e r i n g space of Then t h e a c t i o n
,
Β , of
unijorrn
the uniform
and
is
E'
c Ε
is
all
transverse
uniform c o v e r i n g
b = p(x)
at
(pxp)D
b ε Β ,
to ,
ρ .
where
D
I assert
then
equicontinuous.
be as b e f o r e
φ : X ->• X .
.
sections
where
satisfies
that
(φ(ς),φ(χ))
transformation
The p a r t i a l
the point
connected,
b ,
and s o
and
if
ε D
(8,1)
(ξ,χ) for
ε D',
each
For c o n s i d e r
(3.12)
of
and s o
ξ ε D[x] = s^E[b]
ρ(ς)
ε E'tbJ,
φ(ς)
ε φs'^E'[b]
(φ(ς),φ(χ)) In t h i s
topology.
thus
ε D
also
=
by t h e
(ρ(ξ),ρ(χ)) .
Now
the
E'[b]
by
ε Ε'
in the topological
and
and
so
φ ,
not
t h e uniform
if
Φ
sense
then Thus i t
is
we h a v e o n l y
continuity.
a covering
Φ is
In
base
covering
a covering
i s unnecessary
spaces
over
used fact
transformation transformation to
distinguish
t h e u n i f o r m P o i n c a r e ' g r o u p and t h e t o p o l o g i c a l
connected
so
Therefore
i t may b e o b s e r v e d ,
sense.
uniform
hypothesis,
as r e q u i r e d .
of
group for
is
coincidence
ζ ε D'[x],
C 0[φ(χ,],
t h e argument shows t h a t
i n the uniform
We h a v e
ς ε s^E'Cb]
argument,
the continuity
ρφΞ' = p s ' , . X Φ IX;
φs^E·Γb] = s^^^jE'Cb],
theorem
between
i s uniformly
sections
where
agree
X
Ε =
D' = D η ( p x p ) ~ ^ E '
partial
j ^
and
c o n n e c t e d for
D « D
where
spaces
Poincare' group on
For l e t E'Lb]
tovenng
a uniformly
Poincare
locally
space.
By c o m b i n i n g
Corollary
(8.6).
covering
s p a c e of
the
last
Let Β ,
X
two r e s u l t s w i t h
be a u n i f o r m l y
where
Β
(8.2)
we
connected
i s uniformly
obtain
uniform
locally
I.M. James connected. form
Then t h e n a t u r a l
covering,
where
G
Among t h e u n i f o r m special
role
following
the
uniform
c o v e r i n g s of
p l a y e d by t h o s e
ττ : X
X/G
is
a uni-
Poincare group of
a given base space
which are regular
in
X .
a
the
sense.
Definition regular
is
is
projection
(8.7).
if,
The u n i f o r m
first,
t h e uniform
X
covering
is uniformly
P o i n o a r ^ group of
X
space
connected
acts
X
of
and,
Β
is
secondly,
transitively
on
the
fibres. For e x a m p l e , of
the uniformly
neutral
of
X/G
Proposition Β .
over
Β .
X e ρ ^ (b)
X
is
Let
this,
choose
ε ρ ^(b)
is
where
be a u n i f o r m l y a uniform a point
exists
b e Β is
φ
Therefore
φ = ψ
Χ ,
Let X
G
be a
through uniform
throughout
at
(discrete)
equivalences.
the diagonal
X X Τ .
If
t h e a c t i o n on
uniformly
properly discontinuous (8.2),the
I T : X X T - > X X q T
action
is
uniform
by
.
X
natural
is
space
function
point
(2.7),
Since
transformation
Then
ρφ = ρ = ρψ .
since
Χ
is
(8.8). on t h e u n i f o r m
Consider,
action
covering
transformation.
and a
group a c t i n g
Τ ,
by
then the
covering χ
This proves
G-space
and h e n c e ,
the
the projection.
a uniform
which agrees with
connected.
If
continuous
covering
ψ : X -»• X
uniformly
X .
be a r e g u l a r u n i f o r m
ρ : X -· X φ
,
be a g r o u p of u n i f o r m
properly discontinuous
Then
To s e e
φ(χ)
by
(6.8).
Let
G
connected uniform
and u n i f o r m l y
covering
of
let
of
G
any
discrete
on t h e u n i f o r m
uniformly then
for
so i s
projection
space
product
equicontinuous
and
the a c t i o n
X χ Τ
on
mjorm covering spaces is
a uniform
X Xq Τ ,
covering.
in the usual
Proposition space
of
let
G
H e r e we h a v e w r i t t e n
(8.9).
Β ,
way. Let
where
(X''T)/G . a s
X
Β
be t h e u n i f o r m
be a r e g u l a r u n i f o r m
i s uniformly
locally
P o i n c a r e group of
covering
connected,
X .
Then
and
the
projection ρ : X is
Τ Η- X/G = Β
a uniform Here
below,
covering,
ρ
is defined
where
natural
for
ρ
is
i·'
the f i r s t
>
projection
and
π
denotes
shown the
space.
X
π
π Χχ^Τ
> X/G
G
ρ
ρ
is
a uniform
are the p r o j e c t i o n s is
Τ .
through the commutative diagriim
p r o j e c t i o n onto the o r b i t
XxT
Now
each d i s c r e t e G-space
a l s o a uniform In f a c t ,
t u t e s a functor
covering, π , by
since
(8.2).
By
is discrete, (8.3)
and s o
therefore,
P
covering.
u n d e r t h e c o n d i t i o n s of from
(8.9),
X x_ G
consti-
t h e c a t e g o r y of d i s c r e t e G - s p a c e s and G-
maps t o t h e c a t e g o r y o f u n i f o r m uniformly
Τ
continuous functions
r e s u l t s w h i c h may h e l p t o
covering over
Β .
illustrate
spaces over
Β
and
We p r o v e t w o f u r t h e r
the behaviour of
this
functor . Proposition s p a c e of Τ
(8.10).
Β ,
where
Let Β
be a d i s c r e t e G - s p a c e ,
g r o u p of onlv
if
X . G
Then
X
be a r e g u l a r u n i f o r m
i s uniformly where
X x^ Τ
acts transitively
G
is
locally
on
Τ .
connected.
the uniform
i s uniformly
covering
connected
Let
Poincar^ if
and
110
I.M. James For
T/G
suppose
that
is uniformly
uniformly given
X x^ Τ
connected,
continuous
there
exists a
orbit.
Thus
Since
X
: Χ x^ Τ
if
t,t'
T/G
t Τ
is a
are
η ,
,
where
t ^^ , t 2 , . . . , t ^
In o t h e r words t h e a c t i o n
Conversely
t
prj/G
Then
chain = f
seme i n t e g e r
since
surjection.
^ = for
i s uniformly connected.
suppose t h a t
i s uniformly
G
is
transitivity
connected,
SO
Τ
implies
in the
so i s
that
same
transitive.
acts transitively
t Τ and h e n c e s o 13 t h e p r o j e c t i o n
However,
lie
Χ x [t},
ΤΓ{Χ χ { t } ) π(X χ { t } )
on
Τ .
for
each
point
C χ x^ Τ .
= X χ _ Τ , and LI
X
i s uniformly
Proposition s p a c e of X/H for
is
(8.11J.
Β ,
every
where
Β
to
subgroup
To s e e k +
X
Let
where
equivalent
this, X
k(x)
continuous
X
connected. X
i s uniformly
of
m -
= (x,e)
,
locally
the
covering Then
space over
Poincare group
the uniformly
proof.
connected.
as a u n i f o r m
t h e uniform
consider G
be a r e g u l a r u n i f o r m
X x^, G/H
Η
This completes
continuous
G
Β ,
of
X .
functions
X , and
m(x,g)
= x.g
.
These induce
uniformly
functions
X/H -- Β
in the t o p o l o g i c a l
P o i n c a r ^ g r o u p of
One may c o n c l u d e ,
conditions
ρ
and t h e r e f o r e
suppose that
Β , X
Since
and s o
a uniform c o v e r i n g
a uniform
More g e n e r a l l y , covering
is
b € Β , and i f
can be r e p r e s e n t e d
ο + λ = λ
ρ ,
pathwise-conriected
each p o i n t
(α+λ,λ)
ρ : Β/π^ (Β) ->• Β .
and u n i f o r m l y
covering
E[bJ
Now t h e p r o j e c t i o n
bijection
Β .
121
space
of
reasonable sense is a
,
Appendix:
filers
In t o p o l o g y nowadays
the v a l u e of
is generally
recognized.
the concept,
i n t h e m a i n p a r t of
an a p p e n d i x
a brief
no d o u b t i t
will
Definition
a c c o u n t of
A filter
F
of
the t e x t ,
the n e c e s s a r y to
non-empty s u b s e t s
theory,
many o f
on a g i v e n
set
of
X
X
a member of
F
(ii)
the i n t e r s e c t i o n
of
subfamily
In a s e t
Such f i l t e r s family for
the most immediately obvious
of
all
s u p e r s e t s of a g i v e n
have t h e p r o p e r t y that
o f members i s
finite
s e t s but i n f i n i t e
s e t form
a l l members o f ment of
a finite
It
is often
family
a filter
F^
F,
F
is
a
non-empty
This
sets contain
is
F^
i s empty.
such t h a t
those
subset. of
always
filters
are
any
the
case
which do n o t
subsets
of
an
the i n t e r s e c t i o n
(A c o f i n i t e
subset
is
of
the
ccmple-
subset). convenient to specify
o b t a i n e d by t a l c i n g
follows .
that
filters
For e x a m p l e t h e c o f i n i t e
of g e n e r a t o r s ,
For t h i s
a non-
the i n t e r s e c t i o n
a l s o a member.
have t h i s p r o p e r t y . infinite
readers. ~
a member o f of
as
F. X
which c o n s i s t
is
of
although
my
such
each s u p e r s e t of
a finite
is
use
I am i n c l u d i n g
(i)
member o f
filter
I h a v e made e s s e n t i a l
a l r e a d y be f a m i l i a r
(Λ.1).
empty f a m i l y
Since
t h e c o n c e p t of
i.e.
all
t o wor)c t h e
a family
a filter
such t h a t
s u p e r s e t s of members of
family
has t o
sati sfy
by d e f i n i n g
the the
filter
a
is
family.
one c o n d i t i o n ,
as
Appendix: filers Definition
(Λ.2).
empty f a m i l y s e c t i o n of
Β
A filter
b a s e on a g i v e n
of n o n - e m p t y s u b s e t s
each f i n i t e
subfamily
Of c o u r s e e v e r y f i l t e r
of
of
B
set
X
X
s non-
such t h a t
contains
c a n be r e g a r d e d
is
tne
a member o f
as i t s
the
filter
of
example,
consider
of
its
a sequence
The e l e m e n t a r y f i l t e r
by t h e f a m i l y
Note t h a t
it
to define
the
the
φ : X
If
defined
by t a k i n g
In c a s e
F
X
is
is
φ a s
In g e n e r a l X
in the
sequence
{Xj^
,...} than the
set
is
X.
the
for
set
filter
k =
ix,^]
we h a v e t o know t h e o r d e r o f
Y
the
on
X.
a subset
φ
Y of
1,2,.. in
ordei
the terms
If,
then a f i l t e r t h e members of
and F
φ
to
however,
in
b a s e on
is
and
φ^F F
Y on
X
are Y
is
as a b a s e .
t h e i n c l u s i o n we r e f e r Y .
G
φ
for
is
G
which the
surjective,
are s a t i s f i e d
φ*0 .
i n c l u s i o n we r e f e r it
X
In c a s e to
φ*0
only defined
X
Y.
non-
then
and t h e is
on
preimages
t h e preimages are a l l
be t h e c a s e when
Of c o u r s e ,
where
hand t h a t we h a v e a f i l t e r
i s d e n o t e d by
the
the filter
a subset
as the trace
cf
of ϋ
when e v e r y member o f
X.
Definition is
of
on t h e o t h e r
as w i l l
meets
X
t h e r e may be members o f
so generated and
on
Images of
c o n d i t i o n s for a f i l t e r
γ
be a f u n c t i o n ,
a filter
are empty.
empty,
F
with the
t o know m o r e
the e x t e n s i o n
Suppose,
G
points
sequence.
sets.
in
of
subsets
necessary
filter;
Now l e t
to
of
For another t y p e
^^^^^
associated
generated
is
supersets.
Β .
own b a s e .
A l s o e a c h n o n - e m p t y s u b s e t c a n be t a k e n a s t h e b a s e o f consisting
inter-
(A.3).
a filter
a member of In t h i s
F'
Let on
F X
be a f i l t e r
on
X.
A refinement
s u c h t h a t e a c h member of
F
is
of also
F'. s i t u a t i o n we s a y t h a t
F'
refines
F,
or t h a t
F
I.. James is
refined
F".
by
When t h e p o s s i b i l i t y
b e e x c l u d e d we d e s c r i b e For
example,
of
let
F
e a c h member o f
and
base
G.
F
Μ η N,
No common r e f i n e m e n t F
and
G
and
filter Y
Y
are
sets.
F
on
X.
such t h a t
Refinement filters
Then
φ*G
φ*φ*Ρ
φ^φ*6
is
is
such
to
Ν e G,
of
that
family
constitutes
which r e f i n e s course,
F
both
if
there
meet.
φ : X ->· Y
be a f u n c t i o n ,
refined
refines
G
by
F,
where
for
each
for each f i l t e r
G
defined.
imposes a p a r t i a l
on a g i v e n
is called
which do n o t
X
Then t h e
and
can e x i s t ,
let
Also
G.
a filter,
is
strict.
be f i l t e r s on
Μ ε F
where
For a n o t h e r e x a m p l e ,
on
G
and s o g e n e r a t e s
a r e members o f
X
and
as
m e e t s e a c h member o f
intersections
a filter
the refinement
F = F'
that
set.
o r d e r on t h e c o l l e c t i o n
A m a x i m a l e l e m e n t of
an u l t r a f i l t e r .
The f o l l o w i n g
the
of
collection
criterion
is
often
useful . Proposition
(A.4).
ultrafilter
the following
if
Μ υ Ν £ F,
For a f i l t e r
where
subsets
N'
Now
is
F'
since
Ν
of
F.
Μ € F'
condition since
F'
of
Therefore
but
F
Μ /
F
then
is
Μ /
Μ u N'
e F
a refinement
of
filter,
since
This ccmpletes
of
F
Μ e F and
n o t an
F
admits a s t r i c t
or
But then
F.
Ν /
is
of
F. The
F'.
strict,
refinement and s o
X - Μ ε
which i s contrary to
Μ ε F'
Ν ε
ultrafilter.
Μ υ (X-M) = X £ F
F,
sufficient:
form a f i l t e r
is
the proof
n e c e s s i t y r e s u l t we o b t a i n
t o be an
and t h e r e f i n e m e n t
X - Μ ε F.
is
X
n e c e s s a r y and
but
F
suppose t h a t
implies that
definition X-M.
such that
on a s e t
then e i t h e r
Μ υ Ν e F
a refinement
Conversely If
X
condition
Μ,Ν c χ ,
For s u p p o s e t h a t
F
and (A.4)
Μ
F'.
the F', the
does not meet
and by i t e r a t i n g
the
Appendix: filers Proposition u n i o n of subsets
(A.5).
subsets is
Let
is
principal.
Since
F^
on
Χ
MsF for
Such u l t r a f l i t e r s
a finite
filter
of
Fq.
Fg
an i n f i n i t e
formed
In f a c t
is
a refinement
or
X - M e F .
some
principal
filter
-If
the
t h e n one of
the
of
F^.
by
set
is
is
X
neither
principal.
necessarily a special
by t h e c o f i n i t e
For i f
X - Μ
(A.5).
generated
X
role
s u b s e t s of
is
any
is
Μ e Fg finite
ultrafilter
then
by
x,
F
either
and s o
This implies that
is
x.
any n o n - p r i n c i p a l u l t r a f i l t e r
But
χ e X - M,
X.
are c a l l e d
set every u l t r a f i l t e r
i s obviously not p r i n c i p a l
refinement
F
g e n e r a t e d by a g i v e n e l e m e n t o f
I n t h e c a s e of
p l a y e d by t h e
a member o f
on
F.
a l w a y s an u l t r a f i l t e r . In t h e c a s e of
be an u l t r a f i l t e r
Mj^, . . .
a member o f
The f i l t e r
F
(x) F
and s o we h a v e a
e F
is
the
contra-
diction . Proposition and is
Y
(A.6).
are s e t s .
an u l t r a f i l t e r For l e t
F
then
of
F
and
then
all
Ν
then
X.
an u l t r a f i l t e r ,
φ^Ρ
is
φφ~^Ν c Ν.
If
φ ^N
i s n o t a menber
Y.
space. forms
Y - Ν G
is
is
is
a
a member o f
a refinement
and s o
therefore
as
The c o l l e c t i o n o f
or
So i f G
a member o f
φ"^(Υ - Ν) = Χ -
Ν
of
φ^Ρ, φ^Ρ
hence c a n n o t be s t r i c t
and s o
asserted.
these preliminaries
in the sense
then
φ'^^Ν
Y - Ν /
χ
X
X
If
The r e f i n e m e n t
of
on
where
Y.
since
of
is a topological
be a f u n c t i o n ,
an u l t r a f i l t e r
Thus, e i t h e r
neighbourhoods of
is
Y
Y.
since
subsets
After X
on
F
Y - Ν £
Ν £ G
is
If
φ : X
be a s u b s e t o f
F.
Ν £ φ*F. φ*F
Ν
Ν « φ^Ρ
member of for
Let
we t u r n t o t h e
For each
situation
χ ε X
a filter
,
the family
Ν
of
the neighbourhood
neighbourhood f i l t e r s
t h a t each neighbourhood
where
of
χ
is
coherent,
contains a
filte:
I.M. James neighbourhood point
of
N'
N'.
on a s e t
X
such that
In f a c t
the
and
filter
is
a neighbourhood
a collection
determines
contains x,
Ν
a topology
(ii)
of
on
filters X if
t h e c o n d i t i o n of
i s then the neighbourhood
of
{
(i)
every
:
χ
e x)
e a c h member
coherence filter
of
of
is
satisfied;
χ
in
the
topology. Definition X.
(A.7).
A point
of
Let
X
is
F
be a f i l t e r
an a d h e r e n c e
point
a d h e r e n c e p o i n t o f e v e r y member o f It fied
is
sufficient,
of
b y t h e members of
point
of
F
then
F
for
a base for
F.
Obviously,
the adherence
points,
just
is
For e x a m p l e , cofinite
topology,
subsets.
F
if
it
is
an
the condition If
χ
is
t o be
an
satis-
adherence
a d m i t a common r e f i n e m e n t . set
of
F,
the i n t e r s e c t i o n
suppose
of
space
F.
course,
and
on t h e t o p o l o g i c a l
that
X
of
is
i.e.
an i n f i n i t e
set
adherence
t h e c l o s e d members o f
in which the c l o s e d
Then t h e a d h e r e n c e
the s e t of
of
sets
set with are the
every f i l t e r
F.
the
finite F
on
X
is
non-empty. Definition X.
(A.8).
A p o i n t of
ment o f
its
F
X
is
F
condition
converges
to
be a f i l t e r
a limit
neighbourhood
When t h i s that
Let
it
is
are i n h e r i t e d
is
if
x.
satisfied
by a p o i n t
Note t h a t
if
of
F.
by r e f i n e m e n t s ,
t h e o t h e r way r o u n d .
is necessarily
F
F
is
a
space
refine-
filter.
t h e n s o d o e s any r e f i n e m e n t points
p o i n t of
on t h e t o p o l o g i c a l
F
χ
converges
In other words, whereas for
To c l a r i f y
we to
the
say χ
limit
adherence
Of c o u r s e a l i m i t p o i n t
an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t .
e X
of
a
points filter
relationship
we p r o v e Proposition
(A.9).
soace
A p o i n t of
X.
Let
F X
be a f i l t e r is
on t h e
topological
an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t o f
F
if
and
Appendix: fillers only i f
it
is
For i f refinement
a limit X
is
of
F
and c o n v e r g e s
to
G
point
of
seme r e f i n e m e n t
an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t o f and t h e n e i g h b o u r h o o d x.
sane r e f i n e m e n t member o f
12"/
G
Conversely, of
F
if
F
χ
is
of
F. '
then the
filter
H^
a limit
F;
common
is
then each neighbourhood
and s o m e e t s e v e r y member o f
adherence point
of
defined
point
of
χ
is a
of
thus
χ
refinement
is
i s an
F.
In t h e c a s e of
an u l t r a f i l t e r
strict
ruled
o u t and s o we d e d u c e Corollary
(A.10).
space
each adherence p o i n t
X
The f o l l o w i n g
For an u l t r a f i l t e r
criterion
of
for
F
F is
on t h e
topological
a l s o a l i m i t p o i n t of
the Hausdorff
condition
is
F
often
useful.
Proposition space
if
(A.11).
and o n l y i f
each convergent {x}
is
the adherence
a Hausdorff
Let
filter
exist
ς,η
η
if
χ
s e t of
X
condition is is
is
a Hausdorff
satisfied
a limit point
of
by
F
then
F.
suppose
be d i s t i n c t ξ
η
converges
that
limit points
there exists
that
are unique
the s t a t e d c o n d i t i o n
p o i n t s of to
ζ
t,
and
suppose that a filter
as a l i m i t point.
every neighbourhood
π
for
with
X.
and s o ,
a s an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t .
n e i g h b o u r h o o d s of Conversely,
ζ,η
F:
in particular,
(A.11),
of admit
following
space
in
space.
To p r o v e
cannot
the
filter
This shows,
fied.
The t o p o l o g i c a l
The by t h e
η
and s o
satis-
neighbourhood condition,
In o t h e r w o r d s ,
there
which do n o t m e e t . seme p a i r of d i s t i n c t
ζ
points
a s an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t £md
Then e v e r y n e i g h b o u r h o o d o f of
is
X
ξ
meets
i s not a Hausdorff
C o n t i n u i t y c a n be n e a t l y c h a r a c t e r i z e d
i n t e r m s of
space. filters.
I.. James as
follows.
Proposition and
Y
(A.12).
are t o p o l o g i c a l
c o n d i t i o n for φ
on
Y
φ : X + Y
spaces.
F
converges
Sufficiency
on
X
to
φ (x) .
i s obvious,
suppose that
converges to .
X
then
But
so φ,Ρ φ(x),
χ
as It
F
continuity at
refines
^φ(χ)'
the
N^,
Ν . .,
at
that filter
F =
and
x.
To p r o v e
χ.
If
hence
o t h e r words
is
image
φ^^F
φ^F
F
refines
by c o n t i n u i t y
Φ ^X ^
X
sufficient
χ e X
χ
i s continuous
where
and
s i n c e we c a n t a k e
refines
χ
refines
F
at a p o i n t
converges to
obtain the usual condition for necessity,
be a f u n c t i o n ,
The n e c e s s a r y
t o be c o n t i n u o u s
whenever a f i l t e r j>,F
Let
at
x,
and
converges
to
required.
is
useful.
in relation to conpactness In f a c t
Definition
conpact
(A.13).
every f i l t e r
on
To r e l a t e
that f i l t e r s
s p a c e s can be d e f i n e d
The t o p o l o g i c a l
X
space
a d m i t s an a d h e r e n c e
this definition
X
are most
as
follows.
i s compact
if
point.
t o t h e more f a m i l i a r
one we
prove Proposition
(A.14).
The t o p o l o g i c a l
and o n l y i f
e v e r y open c o v e r i n g
For s u p p o s e t h a t Γ
of
X
ments of since of
we c o n s i d e r
is
diction,
Γ.
a covering.
of
Γ
covers
X.
that every f i n i t e
section.
Then
base after
taking
Γ*
satisfies
finite
compact
h a s empty
if
subcovering. covering
formed by t h e
comple-
intersection
t h a t some f i n i t e
subfamily
and h e n c e t h e
corresponding
For s u p p o s e , subfamily
is
admits a f i n i t e
Γ*
Then Γ* I assert
X
G i v e n an o p e n
the dual family
a l s o h a s empty i n t e r s e c t i o n ,
subfamily
X
i s compact.
t h e members o f
Γ
Γ*
X
of
space
of
Γ*
to obtain a
has non-empty
the c o n d i t i o n for
intersections,
contra-
a subbase,
and s o g e n e r a t e s a
interi.e. filter
a
Appenix: filers F
on
say
X .
.
By c o m p a c t n e s s ,
Now
particular
χ
belongs
F
a d m i t s an a d h e r e n c e
t o each of
t o t h e members o f
t h e c l o s e d members o f
Γ*.
Thus we h a v e o u r
C o n v e r s e l y suppose t h a t e v e r y open c o v e r i n g a finite
subcovering.
Suppose,
there e x i s t s a f i l t e r the is
intersection empty.
of
F
on
X
the family
Hence t h e d u a l
Γ*
of c l o s u r e s Γ
corresponding
subfamily
Γ*
Proposition F
Let
A
h a s empty i n t e r s e c t i o n . the f i l t e r
F
set
a contradiction,
that
e v e r y member of
the
on
V
of
F
Since
X
where
χ £ X.
X - V X - V
i s compact Now
G
and s o
and from
χ
admits
χ < A
χ e A,
(A.16) .
and o n l y i f
and s o we
of
(A.14).
of
a filter of
Suppose,
A
a filter
G
is
on
G,
of
i.e.
F,
Then X.
χ
the neighbourhood
t h e b a s e of
obtain
F.
an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t
since
to
say, V
of
A
the trace
since
G
w h i c h g i v e s u s our c o n t r a d i c t i o n .
of
refines Hence
obtain
The t o p o l o g i c a l
every u l t r a f i l t e r
When t h e a d h e r e n c e s e t we
A.
i s an a d h e r e n c e p o i n t
( A . 1 0 ) a b o v e we
Corollary
meets
generates
d o e s n o t m e e t t h e members o f
F,
But
Then e v e r y n e i g h b o u r h o o d
of
However
an
Then t h e
be a n e i g h b o u r h o o d
F.
F
F.
For l e t
trace
admits
o f members of
subcovering.
be t h e a d h e r e n c e
X.
X
point.
This completes the proof
on t h e c o m p a c t s p a c e
a manber of
of
of c o m p l e m e n t s forms
a r e a l l members o f
(A.15).
contradiction
Then
a finite
have our c o n t r a d i c t i o n .
in
w i t h no a d h e r e n c e
and s o a d m i t s
Γ*
F ,
that
open c o v e r i n g
t h e members o f
χ ,
to obtain a c o n t r a d i c t i o n ,
family
of
point
in
on
space
X
is
(A.15)
X
i s compact
if
convergent.
consists
of
a single
point
obtain
Corollary Then point.
F
(A.17)
Let
i s convergent
F if
be a f i l t e r F
on t h e c o m p a c t s p a c e
admits p r e c i s e l y
one
adherence
X.
Exercises
1.
Show t h a t
set
Ζ
Ε X X
for
given
of
integers
(η =
1,2,...)
prime
ρ
a uniform
s t r u c t u r e on t h e
i s g e n e r a t e d by t h e s u b s e t s
,
where
t
(ζ,η)
D^
D^
of
i f and o n l y
if
ζ Ξ η mod p*^ . 2.
Let
φ
tinuous for
be a r e a l - v a l u e d
on t h e u n i f o r m
some
e > Ο
continuous, 3.
Let
φ,
continuous
space
and a l l
where ψ
ψ(χ)
function X.
Suppose t h a t
χ e X.
Show t h a t
= (φ(χ))
be r e a l - v a l u e d
on t h e u n i f o r m
which i s u n i f o r m l y
functions
space
X .
4.
t h e uniform space
bounded i f η
for
such t h a t
of
each entourage Η c D"[S]
Show t h a t
the union of
5.
X
Let
and
t h a t the uniform space
Y^
not
discrete.
6.
Let and
D
of
X
spaces,
t o be
there e x i s t s
with
X
an
integer
S
of
Η .
is
bounded.
discrete.
Show
function-
pointwise
an example where t h e uniform
structure
spaces.
is
a uniform
7.
the uniform
structure
ψ
continuous.
said
subset
and
of
Γ:Χ-*·ΧχΥ Show t h a t
is
φ
of uniform c o n v e r g e n c e on t h e
be a u n i f o r m l y
are uniform
X
uniformly
if
i s uniformly
some f i n i t e
be u n i f o r m
and g i v e
uniformly
which are
a p a i r of b o u n d e d s u b s e t s
structure
φ : X ->· Y Y
φ.ψ
c o i n c i d e s w i t h the uniform
convergence,
X
Y
for
is
Sliow t h a t
product
Η
ψ
a e
^ .
are bounded t h e n t h e i r The s u b s e t
|φ(χ)|
con-
continuous
function,
Show t h a t t h e g r a p h
is
where
function
embedding. space
X
is
totally
bounded i f
and
Exercises only
if
all
8.
In t h e uniform
connected uniform
countable
subsets
C^
t o be r e l a t e d
if
η
(ζ,η)
tains
Let
that
for
for
all
11·
D
space
R
Show t h a t
12·
Let
space
X/R
R
Let
uniform relation
X
partitions.
deduce
that
Β
Let
of
that
for
the Euclidean
η
exists
by
C^ .
are
said
an
equivalence
integer classes
connected.
a given point
the u n i o n of is
both
χ
con-
is
the
closed
equivalence
X ,
.
for
every
structure
φ(t)
χ
uniform
,
in
X .
Sj^
(πχπ)
and g i v e
topology.
uniform
a
on
compatible
^S .
defined is
structure .
t X .
relation is
structure
= t3
uniform
on t h e
equivalence
ultrafilter
the uniform
d"IiiJ
on t h e
relation
S„ = κ
the uniform
Show
sets
all
Show t h a t
where
X .
relation
in the quotient
X/R
X
space
o p e n and c l o s e d
equivalence
be g i v e n by
uniform
and
there
X
R[xJ
space
infinite
ξ
the uniform
Show t h a t
φ : ]R -