Comments on the Paper of David Sharp Hilary Putnam Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28, No. 3. (Jul., 1961), pp. 234-237. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8248%28196107%2928%3A3%3C234%3ACOTPOD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6 Philosophy of Science is currently published by The University of Chicago Press.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact
[email protected].
http://www.jstor.org Sun Jun 17 04:45:25 2007
DISCUSSION
COMMENTS ON TME PAPER OF DAVID SHARP HILARY P U T N A M
Mr. Sharp's resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox is, in my opinion, the right one. However, the resolution does not in my opinion show that "God's in his heaven; all's right with the world (quantum mechanics)." This is in no way a criticism of Sharp ; rather, it is inevitable that any resolution of this paradox, dealing as it does with the quantum mechanical concept of
