This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
R P>R
n.d. n.d.
R P (120 d)d
n.d. n.d.
R>MF n,d, R > MF R > MF
R < P (240 d) R > P (240 d)
n.d. Buchin et al. (1998)
Buchin et al. (unpublished)
Ortigosa et al. (2001)
n.d.: no difference. var: variable. 240 d: 240 days of ripening. 120 d: 120 days of ripening.
Esters Esters are formed by the condensation of an acid and an alcohol. In cheese, this reaction may be spontaneous, or may be mediated by microbial esterases. According to Urbach (1995), esters are not likely to be formed by the starter culture, although Yvon and Rijnen (2001) reported that esterification reactions can be mediated by various LAB, including lactococci, lactobacilli, Sc. thermophilus, leuconostocs and pediococci. This ability is highly strain-dependent. Esters generally have fruity odours and may also influence cheese flavour. They are particularly numerous in hard cheeses such as Swiss Emmental and Parmesan, in which they play an important role in flavour (Urbach, 1997). In contrast, their presence in Cheddar cheese is limited; in fact, fruity flavour in this cheese is a defect. Table 9 summarises the differences between esters obtained in R, P or MF cheeses. In all studies (Buchin et al., 1998, 2002; Shakeel-UrRehman et al., 2000a,c; Ortigosa et al., 2001), whatever the cheese variety, the presence of the raw milk microflora was linked to a greater formation of esters. As expected, ethyl esters were the most important, in rela-
tion to the levels of ethanol, and they were more diversified in Swiss-type cheese (Buchin et al., unpublished).
Sulphur compounds Sulphur compounds contribute to cheese flavour. They are numerous in mould- or smear-surface cheeses, and provide typical cabbage or garlic flavours (Urbach, 1997; Yvon and Rijnen, 2001). Hydrogen sulphide, methional, methanethiol, dimethyldisulphide and dimethyhrisulphide are related to Cheddar flavour (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000); methional, methanethiol and dimethyltrisulphide are key flavour compounds in Emmental cheese (Rychlik and Bosset, 2001), 3-methyhhio-1propanol is present in premium quality Cheddar cheese, ethyl 3-methyhhiopropanoate in Parmesan cheese, while methanethiol is related to unpleasant odours in Grana cheese (Urbach, 1997). The sulphur compounds in cheese derive from the sulphur amino acids. Several mechanisms are involved in their formation. In the reducing environment of cheese, purely chemical decomposition of methionine or cysteine could occur to produce compounds such as methanethiol or H2S. A negative redox potential is a necessary condition for the production of volatile
Raw Milk Cheeses
Table 8
Alcohols in raw (R), pasteurised (P) or microfiltered (MF) milk cheeses
Cheese
Emmental
Ethanol 1-Propanol 2-Methyl propanol 1-Butanol 3-Methyl butanol 1-Pentanol 1-Hexanol 1-Heptanol 1-Octanol 1-Nonanol 1-Decanol 2-Ethyl 1-decanol 2-Propanol 2-Propen-l-ol 2-Butanol 3-Methyl 2-butanol 2-Pentanol 2-Hexanol 2-Heptanol 2-Octanol 2-Nonanol 2-Decanol 3-Methyl 3-buten-l-ol 3-Methyl 2-buten-l-ol 3-Penten-2-ol 2-Methyl 3-pentanol 2,3-Butanediol 1,3-Butanediol Furan methanol Phenol Phenethyl alcohol
R > MF R > MF
Reference
a b c d
333
R > MF R > MF
R > MF n.d. R > MF R > MF R > MF
Cheddar
Cheddar
PR10 d > P PR10 > P PR10 > P R< P PR10 > P n.d. PR10 > P PR10 > P PR 10 > P
R > R > n.d c R < n.d. R< R > n.d.
P P P
Semi-hard
Semi-hard
Roncal
R>P R>P
n.d. R>MF
R>P n.d. n.d. R>P
R>MF R > MF
R > R > R > n.d. R >
n.d.
n.d.
n.d. n.d. R>MF
R > P (240 d) R > P (120 d)
n.d.
R > P (120 d)
PR10 > P R > P
R>P R>P R>P
P R>MF P P P
R > MF
n.d.
R > MF
n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. PR10 > P
n.d.
R< P
n.d.
ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000c)
ShakeeI-UrRehman et al. (2000a)
n.d. Buchin et aL (unpublished)
P (240 d)
P P
n.d. R>P
R> P PR10 > R> P PR10 > PR10 > PR10 >
P (240 d) a P (120 d) b P (240 d)
n.d. n.d. n.d.
n.d. Buchin et al. (1998)
Buchin et al. (unpublished)
Ortigosa et al. (2001)
240 d 240 days of ripening. 120 d" 120 days of ripening. n.d.: no difference. PR10: mix of 90% pasteurised milk with 10% of raw milk.
sulphydryl compounds in cheese, but enzymatic reactions may also be involved (Urbach, 1997). On the one hand, native milk enzymes may produce disulphide linkages as precursors of sulphydryl groups, and heating of milk stops the production of H2S and reduces the production of methanethiol by inactivating these enzymes (Urbach, 1995). On the other hand, the surface microorganisms of smear cheeses are high producers of sulphur compounds, like methanethiol or methylthioesters. Lactic acid bacteria may also contribute to the production of sulphur compounds. Cheese lactobacilli can produce H2S and Lc. lactis has the ability to cleave methionine
and produce methanethiol (Yvon and Rijnen, 2001), and starters may contribute by providing a reducing environment. The further formation of dimethyldisulphide or dimethyltrisulphide and of most of the methyl thioesters from methanethiol is due to chemical rather than biological reactions. Table 10 summarises the differences in sulphur compounds between R, P or MF cheeses. As expected, comparisons of R and P cheeses showed higher levels of sulphur compounds in the R cheeses (Buchin et al., 1998; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000c; Ortigosa et al., 2001), except in the study by
334
Raw Milk Cheeses
Table 9
Esters in raw (R), pasteurised (P) and microfiltered (MF) milk cheeses Semi-hard
Semi-hard
Emmental
Methyl acetate Methyl propanoate Methyl butanoate Methyl hexanoate Methyl octanoate Ethyl methanoate Ethyl acetate Ethyl propanoate Ethyl butanoate Ethyl hexanoate Ethyl heptanoate Ethyl octanoate Ethyl decanoate Ethyl dodecanoate Ethyl tetradecanoate Propyl acetate Propyl propanoate Propyl butanoate Butyl acetate Butyl propanoate Pentyl acetate 1-Methyl-propyl acetate 2-Methyl-propyl propanoate 2-Methyl-propyl butanoate 3-Methyl-butyl acetate 2-Methyl-butyl butanoate 3-Methyl-butyl butanoate
R > MF n.d. a n.d. n.d.
R>MF R>MF n.d. n.d. n.d.
R R R R
R>MF R>MF n.d. R>MF
Reference
Buchin et aL (unpublished)
a b c d
> > > >
MF MF MF MF
R > MF
Cheddar
Cheddar
Cheese
R>P
R>P
R>P PR10 d > P PR10 > P R>P
R>P R>P R>P R>P
n.d. n.d. n.d. R > MF n.d.
R>P n.d.
Roncal
n.d. R > P (120 d) b
R > P (240 d) c n.d.
R>MF n.d.
n.d.
R>MF R>MF R>MF n.d. n.d. R>MF
R > MF R > MF
R>MF
R > MF R > MF
R>MF n.d.
n.d.
n.d. ShakeeI-UrRehman et al. (2000c)
ShakeeI-UrRehman et al. (2000a)
Buchin et al. (1998)
Buchin et al. (unpublished)
Ortigosa et al. (2001)
n.d.: no difference. 120 d: 120 days of ripening. 240 d" 240 days of ripening. PR10: mix of 90% pasteurised milk with 10% of raw milk.
Shakeel-Ur-Rehman etal. (2000a), where dimethyldisulphide and dimethyhrisulphide were absent from R cheeses. In comparisons of R and MF cheeses, Buchin et al. (2002) found no differences in Morbier-type cheeses, and only a higher level of dimethyldisulphide in raw milk Swiss-type cheeses. This would indicate that the inactivation of native enzymes by heating the milk may be a major event in the diminution of sulphur compound formation, compared to the elimination of the native flora. It is noteworthy that in all these studies, the diversity of the sulphur compounds reported was very poor.
Lactones, hydrocarbons Table 11 summarises the differences in lactones between R and P cheeses.
Lactones are the result of spontaneous cyclisation of the hydroxy-acids naturally present in milk fat. In the studies by Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (2000a,c), heattreatment of the milk influenced the levels of some lactones, but the results were inconsistent. Their occurrence in cheese may also be linked to feeding (Urbach, 1997). Whether aliphatic or aromatic, the levels of hydrocarbons in cheeses do not seem to be influenced by the presence of the native microflora in milk. In conclusion, the presence of the native microflora in R cheeses is of primary importance for the formation of most volatile compounds. Nevertheless, considering the present state of knowledge, it is difficult to establish precisely the role of this microflora. This role can be direct, in transforming the milk constituents into volatile
Raw Milk Cheeses
Table 10
335
Sulphur compounds in raw (R), pasteurised (P) and microfiltered (MF) milk cheeses
Cheese
Emmental
Cheddar
Cheddar
Carbon sulphide Carbon disulphide Dimethyl sulphide Dimethyl disulphide Dimethyl trisulphide Methional Methane sulfonylbis
n.d. a
n.d.
n.d. R > MF
n.d. n.d.
Reference
Buchin et al. (unpublished)
n.d. n.d. R>P
R< P R
P
Semi-hard
R> P R>P
Semi-hard
Roncal
n.d. R > P (240 d) b n.d.
n.d.
ShakeeI-UrRehman et al. (2000c)
ShakeeI-UrRehman et al. (2000a)
Buchin et aL (1998)
Buchin et al. (unpublished)
Ortigosa et al. (2001)
a n.d no difference. b 240 d: 240 days of ripening.
compounds, or indirect, by modifying the composition of the cheese, with the production of precursors of volatile compounds or of molecules that influence chemical reactions or the activity of other microorganisms. In particular, the activities of the indigenous populations can interfere with those of the starter bacteria. Within the complexity of the native milk microflora, it is difficult presently to establish the role of each population, at the species and at the strain level. It is likely that many of the metabolic pathways producing volatile compounds are strain-dependant (Yvon and Rijnen, 2001), which would make their elucidation all the more difficult. The development of molecular techniques for the discrimination of microbial populations at the strain level could be very beneficial to such studies. This situation underlines the importance of maintaining a high diversity of strains in the milk, to retain the diversity of the molecules produced.
Table 11
Lactones in raw (R) and pasteurised (P) milk cheeses
Cheese
Cheddar
Cheddar
-,/-Octanolacton e y-Decanolactone -,/-Dodecanolactone y-Hexadecanolactone y- Decan olacton e y-Dodecanolactone y-Dodecenolactone
PR 10b< P> R n.d. n.d. n.d. R< P R< P
n.d. a R> P R> P n.d. n.d. R> P R> P
Reference
ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000c)
ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000a)
a n.d.: no difference. b PR10: mix of 90% pasteurised milk with 10% of raw milk.
Sensory Aspects In order to avoid any ambiguity, due to the different use of the same terms by different authors, we have chosen to define sensory perceptions as follows: odour is perceived by the nose, with no introduction of the food into the mouth, while flavour is the perception of the food during mastication, either retronasaly or by the tongue (five basic tastes: sweet, acid, bitter, salty, umami). Flavour/odour
Table 12 summarises the differences between the flavour and odour attributes reported for R, P or MF cheeses. Raw milk cheeses ripen faster than cheeses made from milk, the microflora of which has been removed. As a consequence, R cheeses tend to develop a stronger odour/flavour at the same age than those made from P or MF milk (Johnson et al., 1990b; Lau et al., 1991). This has been observed in all types of cheese studied: Cheddar (McSweeney et al., 1993; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000a,b), Manchego (Gaya et al., 1990; FernandezGarcia et al., 2002; Gomez-Ruiz et al., 2002), Raclette (Gallmann and Puhan, 1982), other hard and semi-hard cheeses (Lau et al., 1991; Van den Berg and Exterkate, 1993; Buchin etal., 1998; Skie and ArdO, 2000), Bergk~se (Ginzinger et al., 1999a), Swiss-type cheeses (Bouton and Grappin, 1995; Beuvier etal., 1997; Demarigny et al., 1997) and soft goats' milk cheese (Morgan et al., 2001). In all cases, this phenomenon seems to be directly linked to the activity of the indigenous microflora of the milk. In Cheddar, it has been attributed, in part, to the presence of NSLAB (composed mainly of lactobacilli, but also of pediococci and micrococci) in the raw milk, which are the major part of the natural microflora of this variety of cheese
336
Raw Milk Cheeses
Table 12
Characteristic flavour and odour attributes of raw (R), pasteurised (P) and microfiltered (MF) milk cheeses
Cheese variety
Raw milk
Bergk&se
Odour: intense Flavour: intense Flavour: intense, typical, acid, pungent Flavour: intense, pungent, salty Odour: intense, creamy/milky, fruity/sweet, acid/sharp, pungent Flavour: intense, sour/ acid, sulphur/eggy, bitter, rancid, unclean Only cheeses ripened at 8 ~ (vs 1 ~ Odour: intense, acid Flavour: intense, sour Odour: intense, fruity/ sweet, pungent Flavour: sour/acid Flavour: intense, of acid milk, of rind, Flavour: of fresh milk, fruity, of garlic, spicy, animal, chemical, rancid, bitter, pungent Flavour: intense, animal, spicy, sour
Swiss-type Swiss-type Cheddar
Cheddar
Cheddar
Semi-hard cheese, Morbier-type
Semi-hard round-eyed cheese Roncal
Idiazabal
Idiazabal
Odour: intense (120 d), animal (240 d) Flavour: characteristic, pungent (240 d), animal Aftertaste :intense Odour: characteristic, pungent, sour Flavour: characteristic, pungent, salty Aftertaste: characteristic, pungent Flavour: characteristic, creamy, pungent, acid
Pasteurised milk
Microfiltered milk
Flavour: bitter Flavour: bitter Flavour: acid, bitter, salty Odour: musty
Reference
Ginzinger et al. (1999a) Bouton and Grappin (1995) Beuvier et aL (1997) ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000a)
ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000b) ShakeeI-UrRehman et aL (2000c) Buchin et aL (1998)
Skie and Ard5 (2000)
Odour: animal (120 d)
Ortigosa et aL (2001)
Flavour: torrefied (240 d) Odour: sweet
Mendia et aL (1999)
Flavour: sweet, bitter, sour Aftertaste: bitter, sour Flavour: sweet
Ordonez et aL (1999)
Odour: sweet
(McSweeney et al., 1993). In Swiss-type cheeses (Beuvier et al., 1997), flavour intensity was correlated with counts of FHL, propionibacteria and enterococci, which occur naturally in the raw milk. In pasteurised milk cheeses, denaturation of enzymes and whey proteins by the heat treatment may also be involved; the aggregation of whey proteins on the surface of the caseins micelles also prevents proteolysis of the caseins. This difference in maturity is enhanced by the temperature of ripening and depends on the age of the cheese (Klantschitsch et al., 2000; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000b).
Besides the intensity of flavour, differences in the flavour profile of cheese can be observed. The flavour of the ripened cheese is richer and more complex when the indigenous microflora is present in the milk to be processed. Some observations are constant from one study to another, whereas others vary. In almost all studies comparing cheeses made from raw milk and raw milk after elimination of the microflora, the R cheeses received a higher score for the pungent attribute. Similarly, acid, sour or rancid characteristics were also generally higher in these cheeses. It is likely that these sensory attributes are related to the presence of volatile and FFAs (Curioni and Bosset, 2002;
Raw Milk Cheeses
Gomez-Ruiz et al., 2002). In general, R cheeses are characterised by more 'strong' attributes, such as animal, garlic, spicy, sulphur and unclean. All these characteristics of R cheeses are linked to the notion of higher maturity, expressed from a sensory point of view, but also revealed by physico-chemical patterns, i.e., a greater degree of proteolysis, a higher content of most volatile compounds, and sometimes greater lipolysis (Fig. 2). The distribution of milder attributes, such as fruit, milk or sweet, differs with the study; they can be characteristic of cheeses made either from R or P milk. In Idiazabal cheese, Ordonez et al. (1999) found a relationship between the sweet taste and the amounts of free proline and asparagine, which were higher in P cheeses. Fruity notes may be linked to some methyl ketones such as 2-nonanone (Gomez-Ruiz et al., 2002) or esters (Ortigosa et al., 2001; Gomez-Ruiz et al., 2002). Milky notes are characteristic of diacetyl and acetoin (GomezRuiz et al., 2002). The relationship between bitterness and the presence of the microflora depends on the variety of cheese. When differences were observed in relation to the milk treatment, R semi-hard cheeses were more bitter than P (Buchin etal., 1998; Shakeel-Ur-Rehman etal., 2000a) or MF cheeses (Buchin et al., 2002). In contrast, hard cheeses made from R milk were less bitter than those made from MF or P milk (Bouton and Grappin, 1995; Beuvier et al., 1997; Mendia etal., 1999; Ginzinger et al., 1999a). On the one hand, it seems that the presence of the indigenous microflora is involved,
Axis 3 14 %
2heptanone 2,3peb.tar ~edione i I Ax~s 1 9 dia~tyl ~ 43% 9 aceto.~ ! '..... 2pentan#ne 3m/~ butana ...... 3me 2penta.aOne// ..............................9........heptan/e "Hk
Figure 2 Distribution of volatile compounds and flavour attributes (additional variables, italicized and boldfaced) within R ( . ) and P (O) semi-hard Morbier-type cheese using principal component analysis C2, C3, C5: acetic, propionic, valeric acids (from Buchin et al., 1998).
337
because P and MF cheeses were similar and differed from R cheeses. On the other hand, the heat treatment is likely to play a role. In the study by Beuvier et al. (1997), where R, R MF and P + indigenous microflora (PR) milks were processed, the most bitter cheeses were P and PR. Bitterness is attributed mainly to the presence of hydrophobic peptides, resulting from the hydrolysis of caseins, mostly ORS1- and 6-. Bitterness in cheese results from the balance between the production of bitter peptides by the action of rennet (preferentially in semi-hard cheeses), plasmin (preferentially in hardcooked cheeses), bacterial proteinases and peptidases, and their further degradation by bacterial peptidases. The role of the respective proteolytic systems and their interactions are known to differ according to the cheese variety (Bergere and Lenoir, 1997). In Bergk/ise, a Swisstype cheese, Ginzinger etal. (1999a) found more hydrophobic peptides in P cheeses, which were also more bitter than R cheeses. This distribution of peptides was confirmed in Cheddar by Lau et al. (1991). According to Gomez et al. (1997), bitterness of peptide origin is more likely to be masked by other flavour components in R than in P cheeses. Bergere and Lenoir (1997) pointed out that other components such as indole, amino acids, amines, amides, long-chain ketones or monoglycerides could contribute to the bitter taste of cheese. Thus, Ordonez et al. (1999) found a relationship between bitterness and the amounts of arginine and aromatic amino acids in Idiazabal, though no differences in bitterness were found between R and P cheeses. It is likely that the presence of the R milk microflora affects the flavour characteristics in two ways: on the one hand, acceleration of ripening by faster metabolic pathways, and, on the other hand, the occurrence of a greater variety of metabolic pathways, specific to particular strains of bacteria, which is also influenced by the microbial diversity. The acceptability of R cheeses is also dependent on the cheese variety. Cheddar cheese made from raw milk is, in general, of lower quality than that made from pasteurised milk (Johnson et al., 1990b; McSweeney et al., 1993). In the study of Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (2000b), R Cheddar cheese received higher flavour scores than P cheeses, but this was dependent on the ripening temperature, as higher temperatures (8 ~ instead of 1 ~ led to defects in R cheeses after 6 months. In the study by Morgan et al. (2001), soft goat's milk cheeses had more flavour defects when made from raw than from pasteurised milk, in relationship to microflora and lipolysis levels. Moreover, although the 'goat' flavour of these cheeses is linked to the liberation of particular fatty acids (Le Quere et al., 1996), no differences were found in this attribute.
338
Raw Milk Cheeses
According to Klantschitsch et al. (2000), the quality of Raclette cheese in relation to raw milk is related to ripening temperature and time; to avoid flavour and openness defects, R cheeses should be ripened for less than 90 days at 11 ~ or 60 days at 14 ~ whereas P or MF milk cheeses can be ripened at 17 ~ for 90 days. These differences in acceptability are of course related to the speed of ripening, since the presence of the native microflora accelerates biochemical transformations in the cheese. The difference in maturity, and hence in the occurrence of defects, is more perceptible in soft or semi-hard cheeses, because of their high moisture content; biochemical activities are favoured by the presence of water. Thus, besides the elimination of pathogens, pasteurisation is useful in this type of cheese to obtain a longer shelf-life by slowing the ripening and delaying the occurrence of flavour defects. The consumer of these cheeses is used to the milder flavour provided by pasteurised milk, and may regard the stronger flavour of R cheeses as a defect. It is likely that these varieties of cheese made from raw milk would be appreciated mostly by 'connoisseurs'. Conversely, Swiss-type cheeses, hard Italian cheeses (Johnson et al., 1990b; Bouton and Grappin, 1995), or hard Spanish ovine cheeses, like Idiazabal (Ordonez et al., 1999; Chavarri et al., 2000), are preferred when made from raw milk. Because of their low moisture content, hard cheeses ripen more slowly than soft or semi-hard ones. The presence of the natural microflora in the raw milk may have a lesser influence on the speed of ripening and on the shelf-life of these cheeses. The use of raw milk does not induce defects, and may even reduce some, e.g., bitterness. Moreover, the more complex flavour provided by raw milk may be appreciated by the consumer of hard cheeses. The loss of microflora and, to a lesser extent, of native milk enzyme activities, in pasteurised milk, affects the typical flavour of these cheeses. In Idiazabal cheese, the level of the sensory scores was related to the level of lipolysis, the less lipolysed cheeses being rated 'rather mild', suggesting that this cheese requires a minimum level of lipolysis to develop its characteristic flavour (Chavarri et al., 2000). In hard Italian cheeses such as Romano, Parmesan or Asiago, the inhibition of milk lipase (LPL) in pasteurised milk may be detrimental to the development of typical flavour (Johnson et al., 1990b). In goats' milk cheeses, the preservation of LPL activity can be important for the development of the 'goat' flavour, linked to the liberation of typical goat-flavoured fatty acids from glycerides (Le Qu~r~ et al., 1996). According to Ordonez et al. (1999) and Chavarri et al. (2000), the characteristic Idiazabal flavour is related to the extent of proteolysis. In Swiss-type cheeses, Bouton and Grappin (1995) found a relationship between the extent of primary proteolysis
and the flavour intensity, whereas the typical flavour was related to the concentration of propionic acid. The presence of the raw milk microflora contributes to the sensory diversity of raw milk cheeses. This has been supposed by Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (200Oh) for Cheddar cheese, and shown in Swiss-type cheese models by Beuvier et al. (1997) and Demarigny et al. (1997). There is a higher heterogeneity in the sensory characteristics of cheeses when the native microflora was retained than when it was removed from milk (Fig. 3). The diversity of R cheeses is likely to depend on the level but also on the nature of the strains present in the microflora. Whether the strains in themselves have different metabolic potentialities or interfere by affecting the activity of starter bacteria has not yet been elucidated. Nevertheless, Bouton and Grappin (1995) have shown an interaction between the composition of starter mixtures and the raw milk microflora in the biochemical transformations and sensory characteristics of Swiss-type cheeses. Thus, whatever the mechanisms involved, the preservation of the microbial diversity in raw milk seems to contribute to the diversity of cheeses such as Swiss-type cheeses, particularly Comte. This diversity in the sensory characteristics is a point of major interest in the production of PDO cheeses. Texture
The texture of cheeses is the macroscopic expression of the structure of the cheese matrix, i.e., its composition and organisation. The texture is formed during two
Axis 2 17%
ABxis 1
{
.~_
~ I _ C N
Acid
Pungent) C3 Salted Aroma 9 1 6 2
P+bact
y-CN
Figure 3 Distribution of physico-chemical, microbiological and flavour criteria (additional variables, italicized and boldfaced) within raw (R), pasteurised (P), microfiltered (MF) and pasteurised + microorganisms contained in retentate (P + Bact) milk using principal component analysis. MesoLb: mesophilic lactobacilli; Entero:enterococci; PAB: propionibacteria; C2: acetic acid; C3: propionic acid; iC5: isoavaleric acid; PTA: PTA-soluble N (from Beuvier et aL, 1997).
Raw Milk Cheeses
stages of cheese processing: manufacturing and ripening. The events that occur during these two steps are different in nature. During manufacture, the cheese matrix is formed. It begins with coagulation of the milk, where the caseins organise themselves into a network, entrapping fat globules, water pockets and gas bubbles. The initial structure of the network is thus determined by the composition of the milk, and also by the technological conditions of coagulation: renneting parameters and work in the vat which influence the moisture content of the curd. The network is then modified by acidification due to the fermentation of lactose, that begins in the vat and continues in the mould. Acidification influences the extent of mineralisation of the caseins, and thus their hydration as well as their interactions. During ripening, changes occur in the matrix through the influence of the loss of water and proteolysis. Proteolysis begins with coagulation in the vat; this is essentially primary proteolysis, i.e., internal hydrolysis of casein molecules, by the coagulant or indigenous enzymes of milk, such as plasmin. Secondary proteolysis occurs essentially during ripening, by the action of peptidases of microorganisms. Proteolysis weakens the structure of the casein matrix. It can be easily supposed that removal of the native microflora from raw milk may alter the texture of subsequent cheeses by two major mechanisms. On the one hand, the heat treatment of the milk used to destroy the microflora may alter the structure of the casein matrix by denaturation of whey proteins or the loss of water, or modify the proteolysis patterns by denaturation, activation or modified retention of enzymes. On the other hand, the elimination of most of the indigenous microflora, either by heating or microfiltration, may modify the biochemical changes in cheeses, in particular proteolysis (Grappin and Beuvier, 1997). Among all the articles in which R, P or MF cheeses were compared, few deal with cheese texture. Some work resulted in no differences related to the treatment of milk: no clear differences between R/P/MF milks (McSweeney et al., 1993) and R/P milks (Shakeel-UrRehman et al., 1999) in Cheddar cheese, no sensory textural differences between R/MF milk Swiss-type cheeses (Bouton and Grappin, 1995) or rheological differences between R/P Bergk~se cheese (Ginzinger et al., 1999a). The comparison of R and P cheeses from a texture point of view is difficult, because of the differences in the behaviour of milk during the coagulation step, due to the heat treatment. Depending on the cheesemaking procedures, contradictory findings have been reported, in terms of moisture, on the compositional differences of
339
cheeses (Lau etal., 1990; Buffa etal., 2001b), or pH (Buffa et al., 2001b). Texture differences are thus difficult to interpret. The results of Beuvier et al. (1997) seem to indicate that in Swiss-type cheeses, sensory texture characteristics of R cheeses are influenced by both the heat treatment of milk and the activity of the indigenous microflora. They showed in a comparison of R, P, MF and P cheeses to which the indigenous microflora contained in microfiltration retentate had been added, that R cheeses had a firmer and more granular texture. Proteolysis appears to be the main factor responsible for differences in texture between R and P cheeses. According to Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al. (2000a), the increase in chymosin retention and in plasmin activity by heat-treatment of milk is the major cause of texture differences between R and P Cheddar cheeses ripened at 1 or 8 ~ While the temperature influenced all texture descriptors, milk treatment influenced only rubberiness (P > R) and graininess ( R > P). They attributed the texture characteristics mostly to differences in water-soluble N (WSN) (Shakeel-Ur-Rehman et al., 2000b), in which enzymes such as chymosin or plasmin have more influence than the activity of the indigenous microflora. Gaya et al. (1990) found a lower fracturability, elasticity and hardness in Manchego cheese made from R ewes' milk than in P cheeses, whatever the ripening time (2 or 4 months) and the ripening temperature (between 8 and 16 ~ They attributed these differences to higher secondary proteolysis in R cheeses, measured by pH 4.6-, TCA- and PTA- soluble N. Buffa et al. (2001b) studied the rheological characteristics of goats' milk semi-hard cheeses made from R or P milk. R cheeses were firmer, less fracturable, and more cohesive than P ones. These characteristics were attributed to the levels of moisture and WSN: the lower the moisture and more intact the caseins, the less the fracturability and deformability. Fracture stress was higher for R cheeses, i.e., a lower fracturability than the P cheeses. This parameter was correlated with the levels of moisture and WSN: the less the moisture and more intact the caseins, the less the fracturability. Fracture strain, which describes the deformability of cheese, was higher for R cheeses, but only at one day. It could be due to the higher pH of these cheeses at this stage, water being partly absorbed to hydrate the negative charges formed in caseins with high pH values. This parameter has the same correlation with moisture and WSN as previously- deformability decreases when the hydration of proteins decreases and when elastic structural elements disappear. The microstructure of R cheeses was more regular, with a closed protein matrix, and smaller and more uniform fat globules, whereas
340
Raw Milk Cheeses
P cheeses had an open structure with irregular cavities. As a consequence, differences in colour were observed. Rosenberg etal. (1995) measured the viscoelastic characteristics, G' (storage modulus) and G" (loss modulus), of Cheddar cheeses. These parameters were higher in R cheeses than in P cheeses ripened for 8 months. In P cheeses, they were found to be related to the extent of proteolysis; a higher G' signified a higher elastic behaviour of the matrix with the accumulation of proteolysis products. The authors explained this observation by the binding of water by the ionic groups liberated by the cleavage of peptide bounds. This relation with the extent of proteolysis was not observed in R cheeses, maybe because of different proteolytic activities during the ripening of these cheeses, as revealed by differences in peptide composition. Mendia et al. (1999) found more graininess and firmness and less creaminess and elasticity in R ewes' milk Idiazabal cheeses than in P cheeses. These differences were attributed to the slower maturation of P cheeses. This was confirmed by the fact that the differences diminished with increases in ripening time, and were thought to be linked to the moisture content. For certain types of cheese consumed mainly in a melted form, such as Raclette, it is more interesting to evaluate the texture characteristics of the cheese after melting. Melting properties were evaluated in Raclette cheeses made from R, P or MF milk and mixtures of the three types of milk in different proportions (Klantschitsch et al., 2000). R cheeses had a longer consistency than P/MF cheeses after 90 days ripening. According to the authors, this is related to the proteolysis patterns, proteolysis 'in width', pH 4.6 N/TN (lower in MF) leading to longer consistency and higher viscosity, proteolysis 'in depth' (NPN/TN) leading to shorter consistency. The viscosity did not differ between the cheeses. The firmness of melted cheese was also higher in R than in P/MF cheeses after 90 days ripening, with a score indicating insufficient melting quality. Fat separation increased more rapidly with ripening time in R than in P cheeses. Softening and dropping points were in the range for good melting quality in all cheeses ripened at 11 or 14 ~ but only in the MF cheeses ripened at 17 ~ The effect of the microflora on the melting quality of Raclette is dependant on the ripening temperature and time; a high temperature (17 ~ is detrimental when using raw milk, whereas, in the case of microfiltered milk, it is useful to accelerate ripening. In all these studies, the lack of microbial investigations made it difficult to establish a relationship between the microbial populations, whether of indigenous or starter origin, and the characteristics of texture. Nevertheless, when the observed differences were
attributed to the secondary proteolysis, microbial activity was involved.
Conclusion
Microbial communities play an essential role in the control of sensory qualities of cheese. They are more diverse and complex in R cheeses for which milk undergoes no treatment to reduce the microflora. They contribute to the development of a typical cheese taste and flavour. Diversity of the sensory qualities is a specific feature of R cheese. Elimination of the raw milk microflora by pasteurisation or microfiltration definitively leads to different cheeses from a sensorial point of view. Still, is it necessary to have raw milk that is sufficiently rich in terms of quantity and diversity of microorganisms? As outlined at the beginning, the improvement in hygienic practices on farms has led to a 'clean' raw milk, with low microbial counts (Odet, 1999). Raw milk with a low level of microbes could induce a reduction in sensorial diversity of cheese due to a reduction of microbial diversity. Indeed, Dasen et al. (2003) have observed that the strain diversity of mesophilic lactobacilli in raw milk experimental Cheddar cheese was close to that observed in industrial Cheddar cheese manufactured with pasteurised milk. The former was made from raw milk with a total of around 10 000 cfu m1-1. The fact that raw milk tends to be more and more microbiologically 'clean' implies that there is a risk that the sensorial differences between R and P cheeses will be erased. Some experiments in progress, particularly in France, aim to evaluate dairy farming practices, including milking practices, on the raw milk microflora in terms of quantity and diversity. Recently, Michel et al. (2001) observed links between milking practices and the bacteriological quality of milk, showing that it is possible to manage the microbial quality of milk on the farm to promote the technologically 'useful' microflora, while maintaining pathogens at a low level. This is a good way to keep the natural microflora in R cheese production, in terms of quantity and diversity, in order to preserve their sensorial diversity. To add selected microorganisms could enhance the aroma of cheese, but the cheese would have a more uniform flavour, a characteristic which is not sought by both the producers and the consumers, because diversity of flavour is considered a special feature of traditional R cheeses (Grappin and Beuvier, 1997). Otherwise, according to Montel (2002), microbial communities may play a key role in the microbiological safety of R cheese. This potential role is supported by several studies in which cheeses or milk, with a more complex microflora, were less contaminated by
Raw Milk Cheeses
L. monocytogenes than those with a less diversified flora (Brouillaud-Delattre et al., 1997; Eppert et al., 1997). Thus, well-monitored microbial diversity, from farm to cheese, by acting as a barrier against pathogens, may be a trump card for cheese safety (Montel, 2002). According to Stanton et al. (1998), cheeses, because of their high fat content and their texture, could offer protection to the living microorganisms contained within them, especially at the m o m e n t of their passage into the gastrointestinal tract of the consumer. More and more studies demonstrate the beneficial effects on health of strains of microorganisms and give hope for other discoveries in R cheeses, which are rich in microorganisms (Bouton, 2001; Moreau and Vuitton, 2002). The preservation of the microbial diversity in raw milk, essential to obtain cheeses with greater sensorial diversity, more and more appreciated by (European) consumers, potentially useful to fight against pathogens and potentially useful for health, is a challenge for milk and cheese producers, and researchers, to take up over the next years.
References Albenzio, M., Corbo, M.R., Rehman, S.U., Fox, P.E, De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Sevi, A. and Gobbetti, M. (2001). Microbiological and biochemical characteristics of Canestrato Pugliese cheese made from raw milk, pasteurized milk or by heating the curd in hot whey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 67, 35-48. Aherkruse, S.E, Timbo, B.B., Mowbray, J.C., Bean, N.H. and Potter, M.E. (1998). Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973-1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. J. Food Prot. 61, 1405-1407. Andrews, A.T., Anderson, M. and Goodenough, P.W. (1987). A study of the heat stabilities of a number of indigenous milk enzymes. J. Dairy Res. 54, 237-246. Andrighetto, C., Borney, E, Barmaz, A., Stefanon, B. and Lombardi, A. (2002). Genetic diversity of Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from Italian traditional cheeses. Int. DairyJ. 12, 141-144. Bachmann, H.-P. and Spahr, U. (1995). The fate of potentially pathogenic bacteria in Swiss hard and semihard cheeses made from raw milk. J. Dairy Sci. 78,476-483. Barlow, I., Lloyd, G.T., Ramshaw, E.H., Miller, A.J., McCabe, G.P. and McCabe, L. (1989). Correlations and changes in flavour and chemical parameters of Cheddar cheeses during maturation. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 5, 7-18. Berg~re, J.L. and Lenoir, J. (1997). Les accidents de fromagerie et les d~fauts des fromages, in, le Fromage, A. Eck and J.C. Gillis, eds, Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris. pp. 509-543. Berthier, E, Beuvier, E., Dasen, A. and Grappin, R. (2001). Origin and diversity of mesophilic lactobacilli in Comt~ cheese, as revealed by PCR with repetitive arid speciesspecific primers. Int. Dairy J. 11,293-305.
341
Bertozzi, L. and Panari, G. (1994). Cheeses with Appellation d'Origine Contn31ee (AOC): factors that affect quality. Int. Dairy J. 3,297-312. Beuvier, E. (1990). Influence du traitement thermique du lait en fonction des conditions de stockage et de maturation sur la flaveur d' un fromage a pate pressee cuite. These de 1' Universite de Franche-Comte, no. 188. Beuvier, E., Berthaud, K., Cegarra, S., Dasen, A., Pochet, S., Buchin, S. and Duboz, G. (1997). Ripening and quality of Swiss-type cheese made from raw, pasteurized or microfiltered milk. Int. Dairy J. 7, 311-323. Bosset, J.O. and Liardon, R. (1985). The aroma composition of Swiss Gruyere cheese. III. Relative changes in the content of alkaline and neutral volatile components during ripening. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 18, 178-185. Bouton, Y. (2001). Raw milk cheese characteristics and their positive effects on health. Caseus Int. 1, 54-62. Bouton, Y. and Grappin, R. (1995). Comparaison de la qualite de fromages/t pate pressee cuite fabriques/~ partir de lait cru ou microfiltre. Lait 75, 31-44. Bouton, Y., Guyot, P., Beuvier, E., Tailliez, P. and Grappin, R. (2002). Use of PCR-based methods and PFGE for typing and monitoring homofermentative lactobacilli during Comte cheese ripening. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 76, 27-38. Brouillaud-Delattre, A., Maire, M., Collette, C., Mattei, C. and Lahellec, C. (1997). Predictive microbiology of dairy products: influence of biological factors affecting growth of Listeria monocytogenes. JAOAC Int. 80, 913-919. Buchin, S., Delague, V., Duboz, G., Berdague, J.L., Beuvier, E., Pochet, S. and Grappin, R. (1998). Influence of pasteurization and fat composition of milk on the volatile compounds and flavor characteristics of a semi-hard cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 3097-3108. Buchin, S., Beuvier, E., Duboz, G. and Tessier, L. (2002). Raw milk microflora and flavour characterictics of ripened cheeses: variations caused by technology. Poster in Congrilait 26th IDF World Dairy Congress, Paris, 24-28 September. Buffa, M., Guamis, B., Pavia, M. and Trujillo, A.J. (2001a). Lipolysis in cheese made from raw, pasteurized or highpressure-treated goats' milk. Int. Dairy J. 11, 175-179. Buffa, M.N., Trujillo, A.J., Pavia, M. and Guamis, B. (2001b). Changes in textural, microstructural, and colour characteristics during ripening of cheeses made from raw, pasteurized, or high-pressure-treated goats' milk. Int. Dairy J. 11,927-934. Callon, C., Duthoit, E, Millet, L. and Montel, M.-C. (2001). Les leuconostocs: flore lactique caracteristique du fromage d'AOC Salers au lait cru. Affiche ECO10. 11 ~ Reunion du Club des bacteries lactiques, 14-16 Novembre, Bordeaux. Canillac, N. and Mourey, A. (1993). Sources of contamination by Listeria during the making of semi-soft surfaceripened cheese. Sci. Aliment. 13,533-534. Carbonell, M., Nunez, M. and Fernandez-Garcia, E. (2002). Evolution of the volatile components of ewe raw milk La Serena cheese during ripening. Correlation with flavour characteristics. Lait 82,683-698.
342
Raw Milk Cheeses
Centeno, J.A., Rodrfguez-Otero, J.L. and Cepeda, A. (1994a). Microbiological studies of Arzua cheese (NW Spain) throughout cheesemaking and ripening. J. Food Safety 14, 229-241. Centeno, J.A., Rodrfguez-Otero, J.L. and Cepeda, A. (1994b). Changes in the protein profile of Arzua cheese (NW Spain) during ripening. Milchwissenchaft 49, 319-322. Centeno, J.A., Varela, J.A., Almena, M. and Rodriguez-Otero, J.L. (1996). Effects of various Micrococcus strains on the ripening and organoleptic characteristics of Arzua cow's milk cheese. Z. Lebens. Unters. Forsch. 203,546-552. Centeno, J.A., Menendez, S., Hermida, M. and RodrfguezOtero, J.L. (1999). Effects of the addition of Enterococcus faecalis in Cebreiro cheese manufacture. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 48, 97-111. Chamba, J.E and Perreard, E. (2002). Contribution of propionic acid bacteria to lipolysis of Emmental cheese. Lait 82, 33-42. Chavarri, E, Santisteban, A., Virto, M. and de Renobales, M. (1998). Alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, lactoperoxidase, and lipoprotein lipase activities in industrial ewe's milk and cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 2926-2932. C.havarri, E, Bustamante, M.A., Santisteban, A., Virto, M., Albisu, M., Barron, L.J.R. and de Renobales, M. (2000). Effect of milk pasteurization on lipolysis during ripening of ovine cheese manufactured at different times of the year. Lait 80,433-444. Choisy, C., Desmazeaud, M., Gripon, J.C., Lamberet, G. and Lenoir, J. (1997). La biochimie de l'affinage, in, le Fromage, A. Eck and J.C. Gillis, eds, Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris. pp. 86-161. CNIEL (2002). Eeconomie laitiere en chiffres, Paris. p. 69. Cogan, T.M. and Rea, M.C. (1996). Artisanal European cheeses. Ed. European Commission- Directorate-General XII, Brussels. EUR16788. Coppola, S., Blaiotta, G., Ercolini, D. and Moschetti, G. (2001). Molecular evaluation of microbial diversity occurring in different types of Mozarella cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90, 414-420. Curioni, P.M.G. and Bosset, J.O. (2002). Key odorants in various cheese types as determined by gas chromatographyolfactometry. Int. Dairy J. 12,959-984. Dasen, A., Berthier, F., Grappin, R., Williams, A.G. and Banks, J. (2003). Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the dynamics of the lactic acid bacterial population of adjunct-containing Cheddar cheese manufactured from raw and microfiltered pasteurised milk. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94(4), 595-607. De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Tosti, N., Rossi, J., Corbo, M.R. and Gobbetti, M. (2001). Characterization of non-starter lactic acid bacteria from Italian ewe cheeses based on phenotypic, genotypic and cell wall protein analyses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2011-2020. De Buyser, M.-L., Dufour, B., Maire, M. and Lafarge, V. (2001). Implication of milk and milk products in food-borne diseases in France and in different industrialised countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 67, 1-17. Deeth, H.C. and Fitz-Gerald, C.H. (1983). Lipolytic enzymes and hydrolytic rancidity in milk and milk products, in,
Developments in Dairy Chemistry, Vol. 2, RE Fox, ed., Applied Science Publishers, London. pp. 195-239. Demarigny, Y., Beuvier, E., Dasen, A. and Duboz, G. (1996). Influence of raw milk microflora on the characteristics of Swiss-type cheeses. I. Evolution of microflora during ripening and characterization of facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli. Lait 76,371-387. Demarigny, Y., Beuvier, E., Buchin, S., Pochet, S. and Grappin, R. (1997). Influence of raw milk microflora on the characteristics of Swiss-type cheeses. II. Biochemical and sensory characteristics. Lait 77, 151-167. Donnelly, C.W. (2001). Factors associated with hygienic control and quality of cheeses prepared from raw milk: a review. Bulletin 369. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 16-27. Eliskases-Lechner, E, Ginzinger, W., Rohm, H. and Tschager, E. (1999). Raw milk flora affects composition and quality of Bergkase. 1. Microbiology and fermentation compounds. Lait 79, 385-396. Eppert, I., Lechner, E., Mayr, R. and Scherer, S. (1995). Listeria and coliforms in soft cheeses made from raw and pasteurized milk. Arch. Lebens. 46, 85-88. Eppert, I., Valdes-Stauber, N., Gotz, H., Busse, M. and Scherer, S. (1997). Growth reduction of Listeria spp. caused by undefined industrial red smear cheese cultures and bacteriocin-producing Brevibacterium linens as evaluated in situ on soft cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 4812-4817. Estepar, J., del Mar Sanchez, M., Alonso, L. and Mayo, B. (1999). Biochemical and microbiological characterization of artisanal "Pefiamellera" cheese: analysis of its indigenous lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 9, 737-746. Fernandez-Garcia, E., Carbonell, M. and Nunez, M. (2002). Volatile fraction and sensory characteristics of Manchego cheese. 1. Comparison of raw and pasteurized milk cheese. J. Dairy Res. 69,579-593. Fortina, M.G., Ricci, G., Acquati, A., Zeppa, G., Gandini, A. and Manachini, EL. (2003). Genetic characterization of some lactic acid bacteria occurring in an artisanal protected denomination origin (PDO) Italian cheese, the Toma Piemontese. Food Microbiol. 20,397-404. Fox, RE and Stepaniak, L. (1993). Enzymes in cheese technology. Int. Dairy J. 3,509-530. Frau, M., Massanet, J., Rossello, C., Simal, S. and Canellas, J. (1997). Evolution of free amino acid content during ripening of Mahon cheese.J. Food Chem. 60,651-657. Freitas, C. and Malcata, EX. (2000). Microbiology and biochemistry of cheeses with Appelation d'Origine Protegee and manufactured in the Iberian Peninsula from ovine and caprine milks. J. Dairy Sci. 83,584-602. Gallmann, P. and Puhan, Z. (1982). Beeinflussung der Kasequalit~t durch ausgew~ihlte Mikroorganismen der Rohmilchflora. Schweiz. Milchwirt. Forsch. 11, 64-69. Garcia, M.C., Rodrfguez, M.J., Bemardo, A., Tornadijo, M.E and Carballo, J. (2002). Study of enterococci and micrococci isolated throughout manufacture and ripening of San SimOn cheese. Food Microbiol. 19, 23-33. Gaya, P., Medina, M., Rodriguez-Marin, M.A. and Nunez, M. (1990). Accelerated ripening of ewes' milk Manchego
Raw Milk Cheeses
cheese: the effect of elevated ripening temperatures. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 26-32. Ginzinger, W., Jaros, D., Lavanchy, P. and Rohm, H. (1999a). Raw milk flora affects composition and quality of Bergk/ise. 3. Physical and sensory properties, and conclusions. Lait 79,411-421. Ginzinger, W., Jaros, D., Mayer, H.K., Rohm, H. and Tschager, E. (1999b). Raw milk flora affects composition and quality of Bergk/ise. 2. Chemical composition. Lait 79, 397-410. Gomez, M.J., Garde, S., Gaya, P., Medina, M. and Nunez, M. (1997). Relationships between level of hydrophobic peptides and bitterness in cheese made from pasteurized and raw milk. J. Dairy Res. 64, 289-297. Gomez, M.J., Rodriguez, E., Gaya, P., Nufiez, M. and Medina, M. (1999). Characteristics of Manchego cheese manufactured from raw and pasteurized ovine milk and with defined-strain of commercial mixed-strain starter cultures. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 2300-2307. Gomez-Ruiz, J.A., Ballesteros, C., Gonzalez Vinas, M.A., Cabezas, L. and Martinez-Castro, I. (2002). Relationships between volatile compounds and odour in Manchego cheese: comparison between artisanal and industrial cheeses at different ripening times. Lait 82,613-628. Grappin, R. (1997). Introduction sur les connaissances actuelles concernant le r61e de la microflore du lait pendant l'affinage et son influence sur la qualit~ sensorielle des fromages au lait cru, in, Colloque Du Terroir au Goat des Frornages, Besanr 27-28 November. pp. 35-37. Grappin, R. and Beuvier, E. (1997). Possible implications of milk pasteurization on the manufacture and sensory quality of ripened cheese. Int. DairyJ. 7, 751-761. Grappin, R., Rank, T. and Olson, N.E (1985). Primary proteolysis of cheese proteins during ripening. A review. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 531-540. Gripon, J.C. (1993). Mould ripened cheese, in, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Vol. 2, P.E Fox, ed., Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 111-136. Hatzikamari, M., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. and Tzanetakis, N. (1999). Microbiological characteristics of Avenato: a traditional Greek cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 595-601. Inigo, B., Martin, D., Barneto, R., Quintana, M.A., Garrido, M.P., Burdaspal, P. and Bravo, E (1986). Histaminog~nesis en quesos. I. Cambios en la microflora y en el contenido en histamina durante la maduracion. Alirnentaria 177, 33, 35-38. Johnson, E.A., Nelson, J.H. and Johnson, M. (1990a). Microbiological safety of cheese made from heat-treated milk, Part II. Microbiology. J. Food Prot. 53,519-540. Johnson, E.A., Nelson, J.H. and Johnson, M.J. (1990b). Microbiological safety of cheese made from heat-treated milk, Part III. Technology, discussion, rec~176 bibliography. J. Food Prot. 53, 610-623. Khalid, N.M. and Marth, E.H. (1990). Lactobacilli- their enzymes and role in ripening and spoilage of cheese: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 2669-2684. Klantschitsch, T., Bachmann, H.P. and Puhan, Z. (2000). Influence of milk treatment and ripening conditions on quality of Raclette cheese. Lait 80, 51-67.
343
Lamprell, H., Villard, L., Chamba, J.-E, Beuvier, E., Borges, E., Maurin, E, Mazerolles, G., No~l, Y. and Kodjo, A. (2003). Identification and biotyping of coagulase positive staphylococci (CPS) in ripened French raw milk cheeses and their ability in vitro to produce enterotoxins. Revue de M~decine V~t~rinaire (in press). Langsrud, T. and Reinbold, G.W. (1973). Flavor development and microbiology of Swiss-type cheeses. A review. III. Ripening and flavor production. J. Milk Food Technol. 15, 33-41. Lau, K.Y., Barbano, D.M. and Rasmussen, R.R. (1990). Influence of pasteurization on fat and nitrogen recoveries and Cheddar cheese yield. J. Dairy Sci. 73,561-570. Lau, K.Y., Barbano, D.M. and Rasmussen, R.R. (1991). Influence of pasteurization of milk on protein breakdown in Cheddar cheese during aging. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 727-740. Le Qu~r~, J.L., Septier, C., Demaizi~res, D. and Salles, C. (1996). Identification and sensory evaluation of the character-impact compounds of goat cheese flavour, in, 8th Weurman Flavour Research Symposium, Royal Society of Chemistry, Reading, UK. pp. 325-330. Loncarevic, S., Tham, W. and Danielsson-Tham, M.-L. (1995). Occurrence of Listeria in soft and semi-soft cheeses in retail outlets in Sweden. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26, 245-250. Maher, M.M. and Murphy, P.M. (2000). Microbiological changes during ripening in two Irish smear-ripened, farmhouse cheeses produced from raw milk. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 39, 107-121. Mannu, L., Comunian, R. and Scintu, M.E (2000). Mesophilic lactobacilli in Fiore Sardo cheese: PCR identification and evolution during cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 10, 383-389. Mannu, L., Paba, A., Comunian, R. and Daga, E. (2002). Biodiversity in home-made and industrial varieties of Protected Designation of Origin Pecorino Sardo ewe's milk cheese. Poster in Congrilait 26th IDF World Dairy Congress, Paris, 24-28 September. Marcellino, N., Beuvier, E., Grappin, R., Gu~guen, M. and Benson, D.R. (2001). Diversity of Geotrichurn candidurn strains isolated from traditional cheesemaking fabrications in France. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4752-4759. McSweeney, P.L.H. and Sousa, M.J. (2000). Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: a review. Lait 80, 293-324. McSweeney, P.L.H., Fox, P.E, Lucey, J.A., Jordan, K.N. and Cogan, T.M. (1993). Contribution of the indigenous microflora to the maturation of Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 3,613-634. Mendia, C., Ibanez, EC., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (1999). Effect of pasteurization on the sensory characteristics of a ewe's-milk cheese. J. Sens. Studies 14, 415-424. Mendia, C., Ibanez, EJ., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (2000). Effect of pasteurization and use of a native starter culture on proteolysis in a ewes' milk cheese. Food Control 11, 195-200. Menendez, S., Godinez, R., Centeno, J.A. and RodriguezOtero, J.L. (2001). Microbiological, chemical and biochemical characteristics of 'Tetilla' raw cows milk cheese. Food Microbiol. 18, 151-158.
344
Raw Milk Cheeses
Meyrand, A. and Vernozy-Rozand, C. (1999). Croissance et enterotoxinogenese de Staphylococcus aureus dans differents fromages. Rev. Med. Vet. 150, 601-616. Michel, V., Hauwuy, A. and Chamba, J.E (2001). La flore microbienne de laits crus de vache: diversite et influence des conditions de production. Lait 81,575-592. Mocquot, G. (1986). Fromages d'hier et d'aujourd'hui. Cult. Tech. 16, 246-251. Montel, M.-C. (2002). Maitrise des ecosyst/:mes microbiens: un tour d'horizon des etudes actuelles, in, Congrilait 26th IDF World Dairy Congress, Paris, 24-28 September. Moreau, M.-C. and Vuitton, D.A. (2002). Le fromage et |es benefices du vivant en matiere de sante.: ameliorations des defenses immunitaires, in, Congrilait 26th IDF World Dairy Congress, Paris, 24-28 September. Morgan, E, Bodin, J.P. and Gaborit, R (2001). Lien entre le niveau de lipolyse du lait de chevre et la qualite sensorielle des fromages au lait cru ou pasteurise. Lait 81,743-756. Neaves, R (2000). Unpasteurised milk: do the risks outweigh the benefits? Food Sci. Technol. Today 14, 38-40. Odet, G. (1999). Qualite bacteriologique des fromages au lait cru. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diet~.tique 34, 47-53. Ogler, J.-C., Son, O., Gruss, A., Tailliez, P. and DelacroixBuchet, A. (2002). Identification of the bacterial microflora in dairy products by temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3691-3701. Ordonez, A.I., Ibanez, EC., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (1999). Effect of ewe's milk pasteurization on the free amino acids in Idiazabal cheese. Int. DairyJ. 9, 135-141. Ortigosa, M., Torte, P. and Izco, J.M. (2001). Effect of pasteurization of ewe's milk and use of a native starter culture on the volatile components and sensory characteristics of Roncal cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1320-1330. Panari, G., Perini, S., Guidetti, R., Pecorari, M., Merialdi, G. and Albertini, A. (2001). Indagine sul comportamento di germi potenzialmente patogeni nella tecnologia del formaggio Parmiggiano-Reggiano. Sci. Technol. Lat. Cas. 52, 13-22. Paulsen, P.V., Kowalewska, J., Hammond, E.G. and Glatz, B.A. (1980). Role of microflora in production of free fatty acids and flavour in Swiss cheese.J. Dairy Sci. 63,912-918. Prodromou, K., Thasitou, P., Haritonidou, E., Tzanetakis, N. and Litopoulou-Tzarletaki, E. (2001). Microbiology of "Orinotyri", a ewe's milk cheese from the Greek mountains. Food Microbiol. 18, 319-328. Rank, T.C., Grappin, R. and Olson, N.E (1985). Secondary proteolysis of cheese ripening: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 801-805. Roman-Blanco, C., Santos-Buelga, J., Moreno-Garc~a, B. and Garcia-Lopez, M.-L. (1999). Composition and microbiology of Castellano cheese (Spanish hard cheese variety made from ewes' milk). Milchwissenschaft 54, 255-257. Rosenberg, M., Wang, Z., Chuang, S.L. and Shoemaker, C.E (1995). Viscoelastic property changes in Cheddar cheese during ripening. J. Food Sci. 60,640-644. Rudolf, M. and Scherer, S. (2001). High incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in European red smear cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 63, 91-98.
Rychlik, M. and Bosset, J.O. (2001). Flavour and off-flavour compounds of Swiss Gruyere cheese. Evaluation of potent odorants. Int. Dairy J. 11,895-901. Ryser, E.T. and Marth, E.H. (1987). Fate of Listeria monocytogenes during the manufacture and ripening of Camembert cheese. J. Food Prot. 50,372-378. Saboya, L.V. and Maubois, J.L. (2000). Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry. Lait 80, 541-553. Sarantinopoulos, P., Kakantzopoulos, G. and Tsakalidou, E. (2002). Effect of Enterococcus faecium on microbiological, physicochemical and sensory characteristics of Greek Feta cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 76, 93-105. Saric, Z., Luthi-Peng, Q.-Q. and Puhan, Z. (2002). Quality aspects of Travnicki cheese made from raw and pasteurised cow and goat milk. Milchwissenschaft 57, 631-634. Schneller, R., Good, P. and Jenny, M. (1997). Influence of pasteurized milk, raw milk and different ripening cultures on biogenic amine concentrations in semi-soft cheeses during ripening. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. A. 204,265-272. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, McSweeney, P.L.H. and Fox, RE (1999). A study on the role of the indigenous microflora of raw milk on the ripening of Cheddar cheese. Milchwissenschaft 54, 388-392. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, Banks, J.M., Brechany, E.Y., Muir, D.D., McSweeney, P.L.H. and Fox, RE (2000a). Influence of ripening temperature on the volatiles profile and flavour of Cheddar cheese made from raw or pasteurised milk. Int. Dairy J. 10, 55-65. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, Banks, J.M., McSweeney, RL.H and Fox, P.E (2000b). Effect of ripening temperature on the growth and significance of non-starter lactic acid bacteria in Cheddar cheese made from raw or pasteurised milk. Int. DairyJ. 10, 45-53. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, McSweeney, P.L.H., Banks, J.M., Brechany, E.Y., Muir, D.D. and Fox, RE (2000c). Ripening of Cheddar cheese made from blends of raw and pasteurised milk. Int. Dairy J. 10, 33-44. Skie, S. and Ardo, Y. (2000). Influence from raw milk flora on cheese ripening studied by different treatments of milk to model cheese. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 33, 499-505. Sousa, M.J. and Malcata, X. (1997). Ripening of ovine milk cheeses: effects of plant rennet, pasteurization, and addition of starter on lipolysis. Food Chem. 59,427-432. Stanton, C., Gardiner, G., Lynch, P.B., Collins, J.K., Fitzgerald, D. and Ross, R.P. (1998). Probiotic cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 8, 491-496. Thierry, A. and Maillard, M.B. (2002). Production of cheese flavour compounds derived from amino acid catabolism by Propionibacterium freudenreichii: a review. Lait 82, 17-32. Urbach, G. (1993). Relations between cheese flavour and chemical composition. Int. Dairy J. 3,389-422. Urbach, G. (1995). Contribution of lactic acid bacteria to flavour compound formation in dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 5,877-903.
Raw Milk Cheeses
Urbach, G. (1997). The flavour of milk and dairy products: II. Cheese: contribution of volatile compounds. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 50, 79-89. Van den Berg, G. and Exterkate, EA. (1993). Technological parameters involved in cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 76, 2133-2144. Xanthopoulos, V., Polychroniadou, A., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. and Tzanetakis, N. (2000). Characteristics of Ave-
345
nato cheese made from raw or heat-treated goat milk inoculated with a lactic starter. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 33,483-488. Yousef, A.E. and Marth, E.H. (1990). Fate of Listeria monocytogenes during the manufacture and ripening of Parmesan cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 3351-3356. Yvon, M. and Rijnen, L. (2001). Cheese flavour formation by amino acid catabolism. Int. DairyJ. 11,185-201.
Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview P.L.H. McSweeney, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork, Ireland
Introduction As discussed in 'Cheese: An Overview', Volume 1, rennetcoagulated cheeses are ripened (matured) for a period ranging from 2 weeks (e.g., Mozzarella) to 2 or more years (e.g., Parmigiano Reggiano or extra-mature Cheddar) during which the flavour and texture characteristic of the variety develop. Ripening usually involves changes to the microflora of the cheese, including death and lysis of the starter cells, development of an adventitious non-starter microflora and, in many cheeses, growth of a secondary microflora (e.g., Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp, shermanii in Swiss cheese, moulds in mould-ripened varieties and a complex Gram-positive bacterial microflora on the surface of smear-ripened cheeses). The metabolic activity of the secondary microflora often dominates flavour development, and in some cases, e.g., whitemould cheeses, the texture, of varieties in which they grow. The microbiology of cheese during ripening is discussed in 'The Microbiology of Cheese Ripening', Volume 1. As discussed in 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1, ripening usually involves the softening of cheese texture, as a consequence of the hydrolysis of the casein matrix, changes in the waterbinding ability of the curd and changes in pH (which may cause other changes such as the migration and precipitation of calcium phosphate). The flavour of cheese curd immediately after manufacture is rather bland and indeed it can be difficult to differentiate the flavours of certain varieties at this stage. During ripening, cheese flavour develops due to the production of a wide range of sapid compounds by the biochemical pathways described below. Volatile flavour compounds are of particular importance to cheese flavour and are discussed in 'Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation', Volume 1. Quantification of the volatile flavour compounds of cheese are described in 'Instrumental Techniques', Volume 1. Biochemical reactions which occur in cheese during ripening are usually grouped into four major categories: (1) glycolysis of residual lactose and catabolism of lactate, (2) catabolism of citrate, which is very important in certain varieties, (3) lipolysis and the
catabolism of free fatty acids and (4) proteolysis and the catabolism of amino acids (Fig. 1). These reactions are discussed in 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening', 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening', Volume 1. Since the biochemistry of cheese ripening is complex, the purpose of this chapter is to present an overview of the principal biochemical pathways which contribute to cheese ripening and to discuss the role of the principal ripening agents in cheese and the acceleration of cheese ripening. Aspects of cheese ripening common to many varieties are discussed in 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening', 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening', Volume 1; ripening of specific varieties is discussed in the relevant chapters in Volume 2.
Glycolysis of Residual Lactose and Catabolism of Lactate Since cheeses are fermented dairy products, the metabolism of lactose to lactate is essential in the manufacture of all varieties. Cheese curd contains a low level of residual lactose which is metabolised rapidly early in ripening to lactate which may be catabolised subsequently via a range of pathways. Catabolism of lactate probably occurs in all cheeses and is particularly important in surface mould-ripened varieties (e.g., Camembert) and in Swiss cheese. These reactions were reviewed by Fox et al. (1990, 1993) and McSweeney and Sousa (2000) and are discussed in detail in 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', Volume 1. The pathway through which lactose is metabolised depends on the starter type (see 'Starter Cultures: General Aspects', Volume 1; Cogan and Hill, 1993; Fox et al., 2000; McSweeney and Sousa, 2000; Broome et al., 2003). The final step in the glycolysis of lactose is the conversion of pyruvate to lactate which is catalysed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Depending on
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 1: General Aspects ISBN: 0-1226-3652-X Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
348
Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview
(a)
(b)
Caseins
~
Tr.,cey
COOH
~ /
o,/
O
/
I
(c)
CH2
,./
I
o
~c'~ /
HO -- C -- COOH
I
~ / ~ XX
I Chymosin
H2C
COOH
"",
,[ andplasmin
s';%e tate
0 ~oeoe~
sSsSsS
I
Lactose
Citrate
tieo
!~~~~ap
sS
Proteinasesfrom 1 Lactococcus
Other
H
O--~--O I Peptidasesof
Short peptides
O
9,
"
"11
Interactionsbetween products
_o, " o
,,,
~
,
9 "~O . ,,
k
y
J
s ss
I
I
i
c
D-Lactate
Interactionsbetween products
3
_
L-Lactate Racemisation by NSLAB
I I I
O" O
-o%~
i
HC / ~_~COOH~. H 3 C / ~ O H 3 ~H ~OOH
,
O O O
~c
Ii
- -
Fatty acid
4t,.._~
:=
O Jvvvvvvvv~cII OH
Lactococcus and NSLAB
A m i n o acids
products
,
/
ss ,, ",#,
~
i I II
~" 9 VOLATILEFLAVOURCOMPOUNDS
s
s
#
Metabolismo....ttcitrate
Figure 1 General overview of the biochemical pathways which operate in cheese during ripening.
the type of LDH (D- or L-LDH) in the cell, D- (e.g.,
Lb. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus), L- (e.g., Lactococcus, Sc. thermophilus) or D/L- (e.g., Lb. helveticus) lactate is the end product of glycolysis which converts 1 mol of lactose to 4 mol of lactate with the production of 4 mol of ATR Unlike most lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Leuconostoc spp. use the phosphoketolase pathway to metabolise lactose; the end products of this pathway are lactate, ethanol and CO2 and thus differ from that of the glycolytic pathway9 Although essential for cheese manufacture, the metabolism of lactose to lactate is essentially complete at the end of manufacture or during the early stages of ripening. Most lactose in milk is lost in the whey and that which is retained in the curd is metabolised rapidly after drainage. However, the activity of the starter is greatly reduced at the end of manufacture or soon thereafter due to the combination of low pH, high NaC1 and lack of a fermentable carbohydrate. The inhibition of acid production is particularly abrupt in dry-salted varieties (e.g., Cheddar) where NaC1 concentration reaches equilibrium much faster than in brine-salted cheeses. Fresh cheese curd contains a low level of lactose which, in the case of Cheddar cheese, is reduced to trace levels within one
month of ripening by the (albeit reduced) activity of the starter or by the action of the non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB). Lactate contributes to the flavour of cheese, particularly early during maturation, but the major effect of acidification on flavour development is indirect since, together with the buffering capacity of the curd, it influences pH and thus the growth of the secondary flora and the activity of ripening enzymes. Lactate is an important substrate for a range of reactions which contribute positively or negatively to cheese ripening. L-Lactate, produced by Lactococcus, can be racemised to DL-lactate by the NSLAB flora in Cheddar and Dutch-type cheeses. DL-Lactate is less soluble than k-lactate, resulting in the formation of Ca-D-lactate crystals which appear as white specks on the surface of the mature cheese. Lactate can also be metabolised to acetate and CO2 by some members of the NSLAB flora, although this oxidative pathway is relatively minor in cheese due to its low oxidationreduction (redox) potential (c. - 2 5 0 mV) and is limited by the availability of 02. Late gas blowing is a defect in certain hard and semi-hard varieties caused by the anaerobic catabolism of lactate to butyrate and H2
Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview
by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. This problem can be overcome by good hygiene, addition of NaNO3 or lysozyme or by the physical removal of the spores by bactofugation or microfiltration. However, catabolism of lactate is particularly important in Swiss and surface mould-ripened cheeses. In the former, lactate is catabolised by Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp, shermanii to propionate, acetate, H20 and CO2. Propionate and acetate contribute to the flavour of Swiss cheese; CO2 migrates through the curd to points of weakness where it collects to form the large eyes characteristic of Swiss-type cheese. The oxidative catabolism of lactate to H20 and CO2 by Penicilliurn camemberti at the surface of Camembert and Brie-type cheeses is of great indirect importance to their ripening. The catabolism of lactic acid causes a large increase in the pH of the surface of these cheeses which leads to a pH gradient from the surface to the core and to the migration of lactate towards the surface. The high pH at the surface causes precipitation of calcium phosphate, which, in turn, causes the migration of calcium and phosphate to the cheese surface. These changes lead to the characteristic softening of surface mould-ripened cheese which, when mature, have an almost liquid-like consistency. Oxidative metabolism of lactate is also of significance at the surface of smear-ripened cheeses (e.g., Tilst or Limburger) where, early in ripening, yeasts deacidify the surface which encourages the growth of the Gram-positive bacteria characteristic of the surface. Oxidative metabolism of lactate probably also occurs in Blue cheese but its effect is less important than in surface mouldripened cheese since P. roqueforti is distributed throughout the cheese and thus gradients do not develop across the cheese mass.
Lipolysis and Metabolism of Fatty Acids Studies in which milk fat was replaced with other lipids have demonstrated that milk fat is essential for the development of the flavour of Cheddar and probably all other ripened cheeses. As in all high-fat foods, lipids present in cheese can undergo hydrolytic or oxidative degradation; the latter is generally considered not to be important in cheese, primarily due to its low redox potential. Lipolysis in cheese during ripening is discussed in detail in 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', Volume 1. As discussed by McSweeney and Sousa (2000) and Collins et al. (2003a), lipases in cheese originate from a number of sources. Milk contains an indigenous lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which contributes to lipolysis in cheese during ripening. Lipoprotein lipase activity is more important in cheese made from raw milk than
349
in that made from pasteurised milk since the enzyme is extensively inactivated by pasteurisation. Rennet paste, used as coagulant in certain Italian cheese varieties, contains a potent lipase, pregastric esterase, which is responsible for lipolysis in cheeses such as Provolone and the Pecorino varieties. Lactic acid bacteria are weakly lipolytic, but their enzymes have been shown to contribute to the low level of lipolysis characteristic of Cheddar cheese (Collins etal., 2003b). Likewise, Pr. Jreudenreichii subsp, shermanii possesses a lipase which, together with enzymes from the thermophilic starter organisms, contributes to the low level of lipolysis in Swiss cheese. Penicillium roqueforti produces potent extracellular lipases which are responsible for the extensive lipolysis characteristic of Blue cheese. P. camemberti and the complex Gram-positive surface microflora of smear cheeses also produce extracellular lipases which contribute to lipolysis in surface-bacterial or white mould-ripened varieties. The level of lipolysis in cheese is determined using various non-specific techniques (e.g., solvent extraction and titration of the fatty acids with alcoholic KOH or by the formation of coloured Cu soaps) or by quantitation of individual fatty acids, usually by gas chromatography (see Collins et al., 2003a). Fatty acids have a direct impact on the flavour of many cheese varieties. In particular, C4-C10 acids are strongly flavoured. Levels of fatty acids vary considerably between varieties. Many internal bacterially ripened varieties (e.g., Edam, Swiss and Cheddar) contain low levels of fatty acids (c. 200-1000 mg kg-1). Very high levels of fatty acids are found in Blue cheese (c. 30 000 mg kg-1). In addition to their direct role in cheese flavour, fatty acids are important precursors for the production of other volatile flavour compounds during ripening (Fig. 2). Fatty acid esters are produced by reaction of fatty acids with an alcohol; ethyl esters are most common in cheese. Thioesters are formed by reaction of a fatty acid with a thiol compound formed via the catabolism of sulphur-containing amino acids. Fatty acid lactones are cyclic compounds formed by the intramolecular esterification of hydroxyacids; 7- and 8-1actones contribute to the flavour of a number of cheese varieties. The principal class of volatile flavour compounds in Blue cheese is n-methyl ketones (alkan2-ones) which are produced from fatty acids by partial ]3-oxidation. n-Methyl ketones may be reduced to the corresponding secondary alcohols. Fatty acid catabolism is summarised in Fig. 2 and is discussed in detail in 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', Volume 1. Volatile fiavour compounds in cheese, including those derived from fatty acids, are usually quantified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS; see 'Instrumental Techniques', Volume 1).
350
Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview
Triglycer~
O,cf o/
%f
>/ J
OH
I
O
II u~zv'C--OH
y- or ~-hydroxy fatty acids Partial glycerides ~ H20
Fo-1 ~ II ~
C
-
-
O
~ , , w , c,o
7- or ~-Iactones
O
H
Fatty acids R-SH
Thiols V
CH3CH2OH
Ethanol
/ ~
C
-
-
S
-
II
O
R
Thioesters
co•Padla113-oxidation O
0
~,~J~',r~,r~,r~,r~
II
c --OCH2CH 3
~-J~,~,~r,,~-,~
II c --CH 3
Alkan-2-ones
Ethyl esters
1 ~,*~-j~-,~~
OH
I
C H _ C H3
Alkan-2-ols Figure 2
Pathways for the production of flavour compounds from fatty acids during cheese ripening.
Proteolysis and Catabolism of Amino Acids Proteolysis is the most complex, and in most varieties, the most important biochemical event which occurs during cheese ripening. Proteolysis has been discussed in reviews by Grappin et al. (1985), Rank et al. (1985), Fox (1989), Fox et al. (1993, 1994, 1995), Fox and McSweeney (1996), McSweeney and Sousa (2000) and Sousa et al. (2001) and is covered in detail in 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening', Volume 1. Proteolysis is very important for cheese texture by hydrolysing the para-casein matrix which gives cheese its structure and by increasing the water-binding capacity of the curd (i.e., to the new ot-carboxylic and or-amino groups produced on cleavage of peptide bonds). Proteolysis may indirectly affect texture by increasing pH through the production of NH3 following amino acid catabolism.
Peptides may have a direct impact on cheese flavour (some are bitter) or they may provide a brothy background flavour to cheese. However, recent research has indicated that the major role of proteolysis in cheese flavour is in the production of amino acids which act as precursors for a range of catabolic reactions which produce many important volatile flavour compounds (see McSweeney and Sousa, 2000; Yvon and Rijnen, 2001). In most cheese varieties, the initial hydrolysis of caseins is caused by the coagulant and to a lesser extent by plasmin and perhaps somatic cell proteinases (e.g., cathepsin D) which result in the formation of large (water-insoluble) and intermediate-sized (watersoluble) peptides which are subsequently hydrolysed by the coagulant and enzymes from the starter and non-starter flora of the cheese. The production of
Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview
small peptides and amino acids is caused by the action of microbial proteinases and peptidases, respectively. Preparations of selected aspartyl proteinases are used to coagulate milk. Chymosin (EC 3.4.23.4) is the principal proteinase (88-94%) in traditional calf rennets, the remainder being pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1) (Rothe et al., 1977). Although, the principal role of the coagulant in cheesemaking is to coagulate milk, some activity is retained in the curd, depending on factors such as coagulant type, cooking temperature and pH at drainage, and contributes to proteolysis in many varieties (Creamer et al., 1985). Plasmin (fibrinolysin; EC 3.4.21.7) is the dominant indigenous proteinase in milk and is produced from its inactive precursor, plasminogen, by a system of plasminogen activators (PA). Inhibitors of plasmin and of PA are also present in milk. Plasmin, which is optimally active at pH 7.5 and 37 ~ is most active in high-cook cheeses due to denaturation of inhibitors and increased activation of plasmin and in cheeses in which the pH increases during ripening (e.g., Blue cheese or the surfaces of white-mould and smearripened varieties). Plasmin is most active on [3-casein, hydrolysing it at three sites to produce the y-caseins and some proteose peptones. Milk contains somatic (white blood) cells, which contain lysosomes, which in turn, contain many proteolytic enzymes. To date, cathepsin D (see review by Hurley et al., 2000) and cathepsin B (Magboul et al., 2001) have been confirmed in milk. Lactic acid bacteria (Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus) possess very comprehensive proteolytic systems that have been studied extensively and reviewed (e.g., Fox and McSweeney, 1996; Kunji et al., 1996; Law and Haandrikman, 1997; Christensen etal., 1999). Lactic acid bacteria possess a cell envelope-associated proteinase (PrtP or lactocepin), 3-4 intracellular proteinases, intracellular oligoendopeptidases (PepO, PepF), a number of aminopeptidases (PepN, PepC, PepG, PepA, PepL), a pyrolidone carboxyl peptidase (PCP), a dipeptidylaminopeptidase (PepX), a proline iminopeptidase (PepI), an aminopeptidase P (PepP), a prolinase (PepR), a prolidase (PepQ), general dipeptidases (PepV, PepD, PepDA) and a general tripeptidase (PepT). They also possess oligopeptide, di/tripeptide and amino acid transport systems (Fig. 3). This proteolytic system is necessary to enable the LAB to grow to high numbers in milk (109-1010 cfuml-1), which contains only low levels of small peptides and amino acids. PrtP contributes to the formation of small peptides in cheese, probably by hydrolysing larger peptides produced from Otsl-casein by chymosin or from [3-casein by plasmin, whereas the aminopeptidases, dipeptidases and tripeptidases (which are intra-
Cellenvelopeassociated / proteinase /' (CEP,PrtP, / L
Endopeptidases
(PepO,PepF)
Aminope~idases
\
\
351
\
CaseinlmCinoaci H dsE ~ i ~E.( ~Se ~Ii .~.~i.D. IA ~~E I. / TransportDi,tripeptides systems Oligopeptides Figure 3
Summary of the proteolytic system of Lactococcus. The proteolytic systems of other lactic acid bacteria are generally similar.
cellular) are responsible for the release of free amino acids after the cells have lysed. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria, although present initially at low numbers (5% or >2% for pediococci and lactobacilli, respectively (Thomas and Crow, 1983). Racemization of lactate in a Cheddar cheese inoculated with pediococci was complete after ---19 days, while it required ---3 months in a control cheese with a much lower number of NSLAB, especially pediococci (Thomas and Crow, 1983). The racemization of L-lactate is probably not significant from the favour viewpoint. However, Ca-lactate may crystallize in cheese, causing undesirable white specks, especially on cut surfaces (Pearce et al., 1973; Severn et al., 1986; Dybing et al., 1988). Such crystals are harmless, but they may cause consumers to reject cheese as being mouldy or containing foreign bodies (Dybing et al., 1988). The solubility of Ca-DL-lactate is lower than that of pure Ca-L-lactate (Thomas and Crow, 1983; Dybing et al., 1988) and hence racemization of lactate favours the development of crystals in cheese. Dybing etal. (1988) calculated that the amount of available lactate in cheese can potentially create enough Ca-lactate pentahydrate to exceed its
364
Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate
solubility only slightly at 0 ~ Thus, crystal formation is favoured if microbial metabolism increases the concentration of D- relative to L-lactate, due to the lower solubility of Ca-DL-lactate. Crystal growth requires nucleation centres which may be bacterial cells, microcrystals of calcium phosphate or undissolved CaCO3. Increased levels of residual lactose, which favour the growth of NSLAB, can facilitate production of Ca-lactate crystals (Pearce et al., 1973; Sutherland and Jameson, 1981). Likewise, factors which increase the release of casein-bound Ca (e.g., low pH or high salt which causes the ion-exchange of Na + for Ca2+; Dybing et al., 1988) or reduce the solubility of Ca-lactate (e.g., a lower ripening temperature) favour crystal formation.
Oxidation of lactate
Lactate can be metabolized by LAB, depending on strain, to acetate, ethanol, formate and CO2 (see Fox et al., 2000). Pediococci, if present in cheese together with high concentrations of 02, produce 1 mol of acetate and 1 mol of CO2 and consume 1 mol of 02 per mol of lactate utilized (Thomas et al., 1985). The pH optimum for oxidation is 5-6 and depends on the lactate concentration. The concentration of lactate in cheese exceeds that required for optimal oxidation, and lactate is not oxidized until all sugars have been exhausted. However, the oxidation of L-lactate to acetate occurs to a very limited extent in cheese wrapped in film due to the low level of 02 available. The oxidative activity of suspensions of starter and NSLAB isolated from cheese on lactose, lactate, citrate, amino acids and peptides was studied by Thomas (1986). Starter bacteria were active mainly on lactose, with low activity on enzyme-hydrolysed casein; Lb. casei oxidized citrate, while Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis and P. pentosaceus oxidized lactose, peptides, L- and D-lactate, but not citrate. These results suggest that the oxidation of lactate to acetate in cheese depends on the NSLAB population and on the availability of 02, which is determined by the size of the block and the oxygen permeability of the packaging material (Thomas, 1987). Acetate, which may also be produced by starter bacteria from lactose (Thomas et al., 1979), citrate or from amino acids by starter bacteria and lactobacilli (Nakae and Elliott, 1965), is usually present at high concentrations in most, or all, cheeses and is considered to contribute to cheese flavour, although a high concentration may cause off-flavours (Aston and Dulley, 1982).
Oxidative metabolism of lactate in surface mould-ripened varieties
The catabolism of lactate is very extensive in surface mould-ripened varieties, e.g., Camembert and Brie. The concentration of lactate in these cheeses at day 1 is ---1.0%, produced mainly or exclusively by the mesophilic starter, and hence, presumably, is L-lactate. Secondary organisms quickly colonize and dominate the surface of these cheeses (Addis et al., 2001), initially Geotrichum candiclum and yeasts (e.g., Kluyveromyces lactis, Debaryomyces hansenii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Gripon, 1993), followed by a dense growth of Penicillium carnemberti (Mollimard et al., 1995) and, particularly in traditional manufacture, by low numbers of Gram-positive organisms similar to those found on the surface of smear-ripened cheeses, which do not colonize the cheese surface until the pH has increased to >5.8 (see 'Surface Mould-ripened Cheeses', Volume 2). G. candidurn and P. camemberti rapidly metabolize lactate to CO2 and H20, causing an increase in pH. Deacidification occurs initially at the surface, resulting in a pH gradient from the surface to the centre and causing lactate to diffuse outwards. When the lactate has been exhausted, P. carnemberti metabolizes proteins, producing NH3 which diffuses inwards, further increasing the pH. The concentration of calcium phosphate at the surface exceeds its solubility at the high pH and precipitates as a layer of Ca3(PO4)2 on the surface, thereby causing a calcium phosphate gradient within the cheese, resulting in its outwards diffusion; reduction of the concentration of calcium phosphate in the interior helps to soften the body of the cheese (Fig. 3). In addition to softening the texture, changes to the cheese matrix may influence cheese flavour by changing the rates of migration or release of flavour compounds (Engel et al., 2001). The elevated pH stimulates the action of plasmin, which, together with residual coagulant, is responsible for proteolysis in this cheese rather than proteinases secreted by the surface microorganisms, which, although very potent, diffuse into the cheese to only a very limited extent, although peptides or other low molecular weight compounds produced by them at the surface may diffuse into the body of the cheese (Sousa and McSweeney, 2001; Churchill et al., 2003). The combined action of increased pH, loss of calcium (which affects to the integrity of the protein network) and proteolysis are necessary for the very considerable softening of the body of Brie and Camembert (see Noomen, 1983; Lenoir, 1984; Karahadian and Lindsay, 1987; Sousa and McSweeney, 2001). Changes which occur in Camembert-type cheese during ripening are indicated in Fig. 3.
M e t a b o l i s m of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate
365
Growth of Penicillium camemberti at surface
:'
Ammonia produced at surface by proteolysis diffuses into cheese
~ ; " ~ [ , u II , ..~ ,. , ~igh pH
Lactate metabolized at surface Ca3(PO4) 2precipitates
.~ .....
;~ "' ,~,~
.
Cheese softens from surface towards
Low pH
, . ..
: '~ ~
"'
............. Migration of soluble Ca, P043-and lactate towards surface
.O
score
,,
...~.~~
' ,
........
~
,.,,!,~; ' ~
.D E
.)
~.
d
~r
"~
'2 ., ....
~" i.--i F.z.1 F.z.l
i-4
o ,..o
F.z.1
O
i--i
,< C)~
.,--..~.
~
--+
:'-..~.
o
o
F-z1
O3
r-z1
~
o co
,
~O
E~
O
O4
00
A
i-.i
I~
r..o
,-I C~
--)'
r,_o
9~ ) '
.~
>
H
r...o
I::h
C~
o c~
C~
>
C~
."-..~.
. ~
c
c
-~ "~
0'~
"(DO
T-
O
r,,,O
-
V'
(D
-~ ~ n--v
.~
d_o.
:'-..~.
,.....I ,....J
9. ~ .-~ ::3 :::3 go go
~
o|
~t
..-4. O~ I--
E
U.
c
o|
c
o 0
.C -
o o
~I
_
.-,='_
>
o o. (~
iT.
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening
KN
T M
E H V
S S S E E S
I I S Q E T Y20 K Q E
K N M A I
NPS
K E N L
C S T
F C40 K E
$ E Y
S I G
S S S E E6o S A E V A T E E V K
I T V D D
K H Y Q
Q G
P I V
L N
P I TI20 P T L N
R E Q L
K8o A
L N
E
R160 L N
F L K K
I N
E
F Y Q K F
P Q Y L Q Y L Y1o o
$
$ T K L T E E E KN
E E50
$
$ P W D Q V K R N A V
V V R N A N
$ I S Q R Y Q
K FA
S T S E E N
$ L
P Q Y
403
$ L180 K T
V
$
S K K T V D140 M
E S T
E V
$$ Y Q H Q
F T K K150
$ KAM
K P W
I Q
P KT
KV200
$ I P Y V
R Y L2o 7
(Zs2-casein Figure 7
Reportedcleavage sites for lactocepinson bovine o%2-casein (from Monnet et aL, 1992).
the hydrolysis of these peptides (after internalization into the cell) to amino acids is catalysed by peptidases. Many different peptidases from LAB have been characterized biochemically and genetically (see Kun]i et al., 1996; Law and Haandrikman, 1997; Christensen et al., 1999; Siezen et al., 2002). The biochemical properties of the peptidases from cheese-related bacteria characterized to date are shown in Table 1. While the role of some of these peptidases (e.g., endopeptidases) is the degradation of oligopeptides to shorter peptides, exopeptidases function to release one or two amino acids at a time from short peptides. Based on their substrate specificity, peptidases are classified into different groups, as shown in Fig. 11.
Endopeptidases Several endopeptidases have been reported in lactococci and lactobacilli (Table 1), most of which are monomeric metallopeptidases. On the basis of substrate specificity, LAB appear to possess three types of endopeptidases (Monnet etal., 1994). PepO is a monomeric metallopeptidase with a molecular mass of ---70 kDa. It is capable of efficiently hydrolysing Metenkephalin, bradykinin, substance P, glucagon, oxidized B-chain of insulin and several casein fragments but not di-, tri- or tetra-peptides. PepO was the first endopeptidase for which the gene was sequenced (Mierau et al., 1993). The pepO gene is located immediately downstream of the genes for the oligopeptide transport system, indicating that the two systems are physiologically linked (Tynkkynen et al., 1993). Another oligopeptidase, designated PepE specifically cleaves the Phe--Ser bond in bradykinin and was purified from Lc. lactis subsp, lactis NDCO 763; its gene (pepF) was cloned and sequenced (Monnet et al., 1994). This enzyme is a monomeric metallopeptidase of "~70 kDa and is capable of hydrolysing peptides containing 7-17 amino acids with broad specificity but not smaller or larger peptides. PepF is unable to hydrolyse Metenkephalin, which is a good substrate for PepO.
A gene (pepE) encoding a thiol-dependent endopeptidase has been isolated from Lb. helveticus CNRZ32 (Fenster etal., 1997). The deduced amino acid sequence of PepE showed high homology with PepC from Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis DSM7290 (Klein et al., 1994a), Lb. helveticus CNRZ32 (Fernandez et al., 1994; Vesanto et al., 1994), Sc. thermophilus CNRZ302 (Chapot-Chartier et al., 1994) and Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris AM2 (Chapot-Chartier et al., 1993). Fenster et al. (1997) isolated and characterized recombinant PepE; the general properties of this enzyme indicated that it was different from the other metallo-endopeptidases characterized from LAB.
Di- and tripeptidases Tripeptidases (PepT) purified from LAB are generally di- or tri-meric metallopeptidases (Table 1) with broad specificity, capable of hydrolysing tripeptides with acidic, basic or neutral N-terminal amino acid residues. A broad-specificity general dipeptidase, PepV, which hydrolyses only dipeptides, is found in LAB (Kunji et al., 1996; Law and Haandrikman, 1997). A number of dipeptidases with similar properties have been purified and characterized from strains of Lactococcus and Lactobacillus (see Table 1). Most of the dipeptidases isolated from LAB are monomers with a molecular mass in the range 40-55 kDa (Table 1). With the exception of a dipeptidase from Lb. helveticus 53/7, which was reported to have a thiol catalytic mechanism (Vesanto et al., 1996), all the dipeptidases characterized to date are metallopeptidases (Table 1). All dipeptidases of LAB show broad specificity and are capable of hydrolysing all dipeptides except those containing a proline residue. Carboxypeptidases Carboxypeptidases are exopeptidases which catalyse the hydrolysis of peptides from the C-terminal. No carboxypeptidase activity has been detected in lactococci but some activity towards N-terminal-blocked
404
~ - - >
--->
--->
H
C~
o C~
C~
C~
U] C~
H
H
H U]
o cN CQ q]
~Q
H
>
L5
>
--->
--->
---> ---~
.,-.~.co..uo.~
>
o
>
[J]
L~ >
C~
> > > o o0 C~
C~
u]
H
o ~o
[5
>
U] C~
C~
o o c~
C~
< C~ H
c~ C~
o o0
>
C~
;-.1
o3 C~
>
o C~
>
~
o c,l
> H
[5
E~
,_.._, ,_..~
.,eb.
E~
o
C~
E~
o
C~
--> ---> q]
-->~
-->
-->~
~
-->~
~
--->
.,-.~.00~
o|
c"
b~
"~gg
o
z
goo . ozo
r
..Q . . ~
d. m md.m d_ mmm .m .~ .m
~c3
..Q
0"~ .~.0~ 0~.~ ~
~
0
0
0
-r 00 < -r 0
EEEE
QQQQ d d. d. d.
E
x 0 LL 0
(D
v e-
e--
o 0 c~
> 0 ..Q cO
.c_ CD 0 0 0 0
>
CD C~
0
0 Q.
rr"
--y --y
---y ---~
o u~
< >
C~ CY
o
u~
H
H
--y
--> --> --> --~
--> --> --> -->
< C> O U~
> E~ A o co U~
> C~
H
C>
< --y --y
> <
O3
A
L)
C> r-fl C~
C>
--~
--y
---> --->--> __>
--y
o L~
E~
o
u~
H
U~
--y
--y
--~ ---y
o~ ~0
O3
> C>
E~
H
O3
H
oJ O~ O~
.-g_~
c ~ ~ o
0"~
.,,-L Ob
X 0
E
LL
.c_
0 v
o|
(/}
c
c > O _Q
0 cCl
u)
o O o
u}
O u)
>
G)
o3
o~-~ .~ .~ .~ Cl -1- 00
CO
H
H
i
07
?
--Y
0 0
? kD
co
A
H
I--I
9
r.O
Z
r,o
O7
m
[.)
~-t
r,0
Z
o o I:z;
m
C)
4-1
cq
---)
4--;
-..)
r-t 4-1
i
r..)
Z
Z
>
O4
r,_9
>
L~ ~O
__~
0
?
o
i
07
H
> H
o7 o ol r~
co m__~
r,D >
~
-_~ ..-)
0
~2
-,-t
'O
r~.N .~"~ r,j'~
o
E~
r,D
r,0
>
r,.)
,
r,_9 r,_)
33 (~ 2~ >
-r-t r---t Ck
(1)
r,D r,_9
>
O7 ~0
,< E~
>
>
O
Z t-t
}
r~
r~
H H
I--I
E~
O
H
o
cO ,v.v-
O~ ob
I.-i,
x
E
O In O
v
(D
70
0.. 0
O')
.--
Ob ~-" ~
h i - -..Z
0~1 "~D ~i 9...,," Ob c'- .~.
O
o
1"-00
m ~~
~ m" I
ma-mO
.~_
In-,,--
o .~ .~
~
I
0
g~ .1~ ..Q
d. d m d .m d mm
e'~ .1~
GtSGG
(1)
0
9....,I ,~1 -.,..I -.,J
~
iT.
:~
"-
0
o o_
(D
m
.....,
,..
o
~
- c
~'~
0 0 "~
~v'"~ "-- . 0
"-' O
9
~
O') ,,_~
C~-.-, O~
.-c~-~
i < O ~ I
m~ ~.. 0
d. 6. d
0 0
m c~
rO
d.d
rO
rO
mm ~,,~ ~
rO
~
Q)~
GrSG~G
,- co ,o r,.. ~
9...J .....J ....,J .-..,I ...,..I
..,,_, 0
$
"0
i
r~ (D cO
E 0 4-"o
C
r
.N i
i
0 . if) i if) if) ". i0
ro
& r~ (3
r,.) 0 v
E
,E
E
,E
v
t~ r~
......
0
8
I"-.
Ob
I
I
I
I
I
I
IT--
I
I
~
C'~" ~ ~0
I~ ~
I
I
I
O4 r'I C~l (.o
Z Z Z
i i i 222
00
I
I
I
~
~
LO ~"3 LO ~ O0 O0 LO Ob Ob Ob Ob I ~ O0 C~
I
I
I
~-.. ~
"-',--
0
I
LO 0 0 O0 "m" "~"
LO C) 0 r,,.o ~. I~
LO r...O ~ O0 O 0 0 b
Z Z Z
2221
r (.o .~-
,- ~ ~ - r " ~ ~ .~
o .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~
.....I -.4 .-..I .....I -....i ....J ....I
~1 0
"" 04
,~gE_
",--',--',-"
Ob
s~
LO
0
LO ~"
LO
",-- ",-- ",--
I~ O0
Ob
~.
.-":'
",--
0
r,.o
Ob 0 031.0
t--,
C)
I
r'-.
C)
~ Ob
0 ~ I L~ LO (.o (D
LO (.o I'~
04 I~. LO Ob Ob Ob
Z
Z Z Z _
Z
~;
..4
~=
2
..4...4..4
22~
~
,~
I ~ I ~ ~3 Ob O0 03
2-2
~
q ~,
-.4-.4-.,.I
~
,-g
Ob
~
:::3
Ob
=,...
C
v
(33
(1)
Ob
-@@='~g
1",--',--04',--',--',--',--
cO (33 Cb v ".,.4
go~ $
03 Ob
cO
E
I--
I
i--
C
I-"-
"r
"
I
I
zo_~
I--
I
u
~
~
.d
.(3
IT
I
(13
",--
I
r
0
I
0
I
~
m
..13
(b
..Q
,
--
>,
(XI
~--
I
I
0
I
I
m
d
0
0 UO
N
I
LO U3
0
~t "
I
0 0 I~. [.0 r43 LO I ~ U3 '~1" CO CO CO CO O0
LO I'-,.
1.13 O0 I
I'~
0 r'-: I LO C~ Ob (D I',,, (.o I',-. r43 I--..
O0 I (.o
I
I
I
I
Z
r
0
Z
9"r"
r...O LO Ob Ob
--09
O0
r,.D O0
CY
0 e(~ ~ r n rJ)
~ - - E N C m O E E ~
~
I (Y
~) ~ (D 0 r'~ r n
0
o
Lr) 0 0 C~l !'~. ',-- ",-- I",-
g)
_j
sss ~.~.~.~.~g~
~ E m
C
I~ (~
C
0 0 rn
Lo OD oD
~ E m
_j
I",I',-
0
i
Oq
0 0 rn
CO
0
~ ~0
-
e e ~
~
~
o o o
~-C > ~ ~ (Dr,/)
.,'-CO
0
UD UD L~D .,--
~
.~
~:~
UD
..J
. m
III
. ~. , -. ~ .
co
o~ ~-
~
Z
~~-~-~
~
9-
,
A
~
~
~-
x ~ ~
,_.~
(~
~
~
~ ' ~
~
,
O0
,
O00D
,
~0
"C~'O~
CO~ -
~'
~
~
~
-~
.~
"--
0 ( : 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~0 I~. ~-- I~. I~. I~. I~. I~-
"~
"-" ~ -
Tm~-ro'-0o
~ ~
o
0") .--.. ( k I
0
~ ~
~0
OD
~
~
~
~w
x
o~ oD v
~
o
",'-
~,~
o ~ ~
0
~
~
~
~
~-
~
o
'~" ,,-
0
~') 0
0
.-~-
z ~ ~ ' ~ -
C~ . C
,,-
~'~,~
1
.-.
I
I
~
~~- - ~~
~-
~~ - ~
~ ~
~
I
~
~- ~
~-~
,
c
0 0 ~ 0 D-- O0 U~
A
o
0 ~ ~-
~.z:
C r
,
.-
(D
>"
~_
c
"O
o c
{ E r
c
.=i
m
c
%
E >., N
.,
Z
z. ~
o
x:
O.
~
o
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening
411
Endopeptidases (PepO, PepF)
Exopeptidases Aminopeptidases (PepN, PepA, PepC, PepL)
Iminopeptidase (Pepl)
1.0,..0..Q_ Pyrolidonyl carboxylylpeptidase (PCP)
X-Prolyldipeptidylaminopeptidase(PepX)
Carboxypeptidase
-
Dipeptidases (PepV, P e p D )
Prolidase(PepQ)
Prolinase(PepR)
|
Tripeptidase (PepT)
Figure 11 Schematic representation of the action of peptidases found in lactic acid bacteria.
peptides has been reported in strains of lactobacilli (Abo-Elnaga and Plapp, 1987; E1 Soda et al., 1987a,b). There are no reports on the purification and characterization of a carboxypeptidase from Lactobacillus or other LAB.
Aminopeptidases The most thoroughly studied exopeptidase from LAB is the general aminopetidase, PepN. In most strains studied, this enzyme is a monomeric metallopeptidase of 85-98 kDa. PepN is a broad specificity aminopeptidase; in addition to p-nitroanilide (pNA) derivatives of amino acids, the enzyme is capable of hydrolysing a wide range of peptides differing in both size and
amino acid composition (Arora and Lee, 1992; Miyakawa et al., 1992; Tan et al., 1992a,b; Niven et al., 1995; Sasaki et al., 1996). Substrates with a hydrophobic or basic amino acid residue at the N-terminal are hydrolysed preferentially. The ability to hydrolyse peptides containing hydrophobic amino acids suggests its potential as a debittering enzyme. The addition of PepN from Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris Wg2 was found to be effective in reducing the bitterness of tryptic digests of [3-casein (Tan et al., 1993). The manufacture of cheese using PepN-negative mutants resulted in increased bitterness (Baankreis, 1992). Generally, PepN does not hydrolyse substrates with Glu, Asp or Pro at the N-terminal or dipeptides containing Pro
412
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening
(Tan etal., 1991; Arora and Lee, 1992; Miayakawa et al., 1992; Tan et al., 1993). However, PepNs from Lb. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus B14 (Wohlrab and Bockelmann, 1993) and Lb. helveticus SBT 2171 (Sasaki et al., 1996) hydrolysed Pro-containing substrates. Specificity studies indicated that the PepN from Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris Wg2 was active on oligopeptides with a preference for peptides with six amino acid residues (Niven et al., 1995). PepC in LAB is a metal-independent general aminopeptidase (Kunji et al., 1996; Table 1). PepCs from Lactococcus and Lactobacillus strains characterized so far are muhimeric thiol aminopeptidases which are inhibited by p-chloromercuribenzoate and iodoacetamide (Neviani et al., 1989; Wohlrab and Bockelmann, 1993; Fernandez de Palencia et al., 1997). In both cases, the subunit molecular mass of the enzyme is ---40-50 kDa. PepC shows broad specificity, with particularly high activity on synthetic substrates containing a hydrophobic amino acid but exhibits little activity on peptides with positively charged amino acid residues (Neviani et al., 1989; Wohlrab and Bockelmann, 1993; Fernandez de Palencia et al., 1997; Mistou and Gripon, 1998). A gene (pepG) encoding a novel cysteine aminopeptidase and with a high degree of similarity to PepC has been identified in Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis DSM7290 by Klein et al. (1997). These authors over-expressed the pepG gene in E. coli and compared the enzyme to PepC; although both enzymes were structurally related, they had different substrate specificities. Lactococcal glutamyl/aspartyl aminopeptidase (PepA) is a muhimeric metallopeptidase with a subunit molecular mass of 38-43 kDa (Table 1). PepA is a narrow-specificity peptidase which releases only an Nterminal Glu or Asp from di-, tri- and oligo-peptides with up to ten amino acid residues (Exterkate and de Veer, 1987; Niven, 1991; Bacon et al., 1994). Glutamate is a well-recognized flavour enhancer and therefore the role of PepA in the development of flavour in cheese may be of great importance. Studies on mature Cheddar cheese have shown that glutamate is important for Cheddar cheese flavour (McGugan et al., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986; Engels and Visser, 1994; Fox et al., 1994). However, the precise role of PepA in the development of cheese flavour is unclear. Under certain conditions, the N-terminal glutamyl residue of a peptide can undergo spontaneous intramolecular cyclization, forming an N-terminal 2-pyrrolidone5-carboxylic acid (PCA; pyroglutamate residue) (Law and Haandrikman, 1997). An N-terminal PCA residue has been found in bitter peptides produced from [3casein by the lactocepin of Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris HP (Visser etal., 1983). Pyrrolidone carboxylyl peptidase
(PCP) is an aminopeptidase capable of releasing a PCA residue from peptides and proteins (Kunji et al., 1996). This enzyme is present in lactococcal strains and has been partially characterized from Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris HP (Baankreis, 1992). Two serine peptidases with a molecular mass of 25 and 80kDa and PCAp-nitroanilide hydrolase activity were identified in Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris HP using non-denaturing gel electrophoresis (Baankreis, 1992). The presence of more than one leucyl aminopeptidase in LAB has been reported (Atlan et al., 1989; Blanc et al., 1993; Banks et al., 1998). A gene encoding a specific leucyl aminopeptidase (pepL) in Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis DSM 7290 has been cloned and sequenced (Klein et al., 1995). PepL has a molecular mass of 35 kDa (Table 1) and it preferentially hydrolyses dipeptides (and some tripeptides) with an N-terminal leucyl residue. Sequence alignments of PepL with prolinases from Lb. helveticus and B. coagulans and an iminopeptidase from Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis and Lb. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus showed 46, 21.5, 25.5 and 25.5% homology, respectively. Two aminopeptidases, with characteristics similar to PepL, were purified from Lb. sake IATA115 and Lb. curvatus DPC2024 by Sanz and Toldra (1997) and Magboul and McSweeney (1999b), respectively. The former was a monomer with a molecular mass of 35-36 kDa and maximum activity at pH 7.5 and 37 ~ while the latter was a dimer with a subunit molecular mass of---32 kDa and optimum activity at pH 7.0 and 40 ~ The 20 N-terminal amino acid residues of the PepL from Lb. curvatus DPC2024 showed 50, 80 and 95% homology with PepL from Lb. delbrueckii subsp. lactis DSM 7290 (Klein et al., 1995), the prolinase from Lb. helveticus CNRZ32 (Dudley and Steele, 1994) and the prolinase from Lb. rhamnosus 1/6 (Varmanen et al., 1998), respectively.
Proline-specific peptidases Caseins, the major proteins in bovine milk, are rich in the imino acid, proline. Because of its unique structure, specialized peptidases are required to hydrolyse peptide bonds involving proline, thus making peptides accessible to the action of other peptidases (see review by Cunningham and O'Connor, 1997). Several proline-specific peptidases with distinct substrate specificities have been found in LAB. X-Prolyl dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (PepX) is a peptide hydrolase capable of releasing X-Pro and sometimes X-Ala dipeptides from the N-terminal of oligopeptides. Due to its unique specificity, PepX is the best characterized of the proline-specific peptidases. The enzyme has been demonstrated in several genera of LAB and isolated from a number of strains and
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening characterized (Table 1). All PepXs purified from LAB have a serine catalytic mechanism and most are dimeric proteins with a native molecular mass of 117-200 kDa (Table 1); however, a high molecular mass endopeptidase (---350 kDa) with PepX activity and able to hydrolyse Otsl-casein was isolated and characterized by Stepaniak et al. (1998a). Increasing the proportion of pepX-negative mutants in a starter culture reduced the organoleptic quality of the resultant cheese but did not increase bitterness (Baankreis, 1992). Meyer and Spahni (1998) studied the role of PepX from Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis by using PepXnegative mutants. This enzyme influenced proteolysis and the sensorial characteristics of Gruyere cheese but it was not essential for the growth of the microorganism in milk (Meyer and Spahni, 1998). Proline iminopeptidase (PepI) catalyses the release of an N-terminal proline residue from di-, tri- and oligo-peptides. PepI from Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris HP (Baankreis and Exterkate, 1991) is the only iminopeptidase that has been purified from Lactococcus. This enzyme is a dimeric metallopeptidase with a native molecular mass of 110 kDa (Table 1). In contrast, the iminopeptidases purified from Lb. helveticus LHE-511 (Miyakawa et al., 1994b) and Lb. casei subsp, casei LLG (Habibi-Najafi and Lee, 1995) were monomeric thiol peptidases which were slightly inhibited by the serine protease inhibitor phenylmethyl sulphonyl fluoride. The molecular mass of the enzymes from Lb. helveticus and Lb. casei was estimated as 70 and 46 kDa, respectively. In addition to these two iminopeptidases, a PepI was purified from Lb. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus CNRZ 397 by amplification and expression of the gene in E. coli (Gilbert et al., 1994). The purified enzyme was characterized as a trimeric serine peptidase with a subunit molecular mass of 33 kDa (Table 1). Prolinase (PepR) is a specific dipeptidase which hydrolyses dipeptides with the sequence Pro-X. PepR from Lb. helveticus CNRZ32 was purified and biochemically characterized by Shao et al. (1997) and found to have a relatively broad specificity. The PepR from Lb. rhamnosus 1/6 (Varmanen et al., 1998), in addition to its prolinase activity, hydrolysed the aminopeptidase substrates, Pro-[3NA, Leu-[3NA and Phe-[3NA. Prolidase (PepQ) is an X-Pro-specific dipeptidase. With the exception of PepQ from Lb. helveticus CNRZ32, which is a homodimer with a subunit molecular mass of 45 kDa, most PepQs characterized to date are monomeric metallopeptidases with a native molecular mass of ---42 kDa. These enzymes hydrolysed most X-Pro dipeptides with the exception of Gly-Pro and Pro-Pro (Kaminogawa et al., 1984; Femandez-Espki et al., 1997b; Morel et al., 1999). However, PepQs isolated from Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris AM2 (Booth et al., 1990a) and Lb. delbrueckii
413
subsp, lactis DSM7290 (Stuckey et al., 1995), hydrolysed di- and tripeptides that did not contain Pro, in addition to Pro-X dipeptides. Aminopeptidase P (PepP) is a specific aminopeptidase that catalyses the removal of the N-terminal amino acid from oligopeptides having the sequence X-Pro-Pro-(X)n or X-Pro-(X)n (Kunji et al., 1996). The enzyme has been purified from strains of Lactococcus and is a monomeric metallopeptidase with a molecular mass of 41-43 kDa (Table 1). Provided that the peptide contains the above sequences, PepP is capable of releasing the N-terminal amino acid from oligopeptides up to 11 residues long. This enzyme also hydrolyses peptides with Ala in the penultimate position but at a slower rate (McDonnell et al., 1997).
Enzymes from Secondary Starter Microorganisms Enzymes of LAB play an important role in the secondalT proteolysis in internal-ripened cheese varieties, and hence contribute significantly to the development of flavour and aroma. In mould-ripened, smear-ripened and Swiss-type cheeses, microorganisms other than LAB play a pivotal role in the development of characteristic flavour and texture. The ripening of these cheese varieties involves complex biochemical reactions, which are discussed in detail in Volume 2. While the enzymes of LAB have been well studied and characterized, there have been fewer studies on organisms associated with mould-ripened or smear-ripened cheese varieties or on enzymes from Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii. The microbial flora of surface mould-ripened and blue-veined cheese, such as Camembert and Roquefort, includes yeasts (e.g., Kluyveromyces lactis, Saccharomyces spp. and Debaryomyces hansenii), moulds (Geotrichum candidum, Penicillium spp.), lactococci, lactobacilli, micrococci, staphylococci, coryneform bacteria and coliforms. Penicillium spp. are major components of the microflora and their enzymes play an important role in cheese ripening. Proteolytic systems of P camemberti and P roqueforti are somewhat similar; both synthesize an aspartyl proteinase, a metalloproteinase, an acid carboxypeptidase and an alkaline aminopeptidase ('Surface Mould-ripened Cheeses' and 'Blue Cheese', Volume 2). The aspartyl proteinase from P camemberti hydrolyses Otsl-casein faster than [3-casein or K-casein (Gripon, 1993). Acid proteinases of P. camemberti and P roqueforti have similar action on [3-casein and hydrolyse Lys97mVa198, Lys99mGlu100 and Lys29~Ile30 bonds at a faster rate than other bonds in [3-casein (Le Bars and Gripon, 1981; Trieu-Cuot et al., 1982). Metalloproteinases of
414
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening
both species have similar properties and have a pH optimum in the range 5.5-6.0. Chrzanowska et al. (1995) purified an aspartic proteinase from the culture filtrate of P. camemberti by a two-step purification procedure. The proteinase had a molecular mass of 33.5 kDa and an optimum pH of 3.4 on haemoglobin. The enzyme showed specificity towards peptide bonds containing an aromatic or hydrophobic amino acid residue in the B-chain of insulin. Besides these proteinases, P. roqueforti has a carboxypeptidase, which has an optimum pH of 3.5 and releases acidic, basic or hydrophobic amino acids (Gripon, 1993). Geotrichurn candidum also synthesizes extracellular and intracellular proteinases, but the contribution of these enzymes to cheese ripening is less than that of enzymes from Penicillium spp. (Gripon, 1993). The bacterial microflora of surface cheeses, such as Tilsit, Limburger, MOnster or Taleggio at the beginning of ripening is dominated by yeasts and moulds, which are acid and salt tolerant, but at the end of ripening, bacteria of the genera Brevibacterium, Arthrobacter, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium dominate (Eliskases-Lechner and Ginzinger, 1995; Valdes-Stauber et al., 1997; 'Bacterial Surface-ripened Cheeses', Volume 2). Growth of B. linens on the cheese surface is thought to play an important role in the development of the characteristic colour, flavour and aroma of smear surface-ripened cheese varieties (Rattray and Fox, 1999) and hence, its enzymes have been characterized. Extracellular enzymes of B. linens include proteinases, aminopeptidases and esterases, the biochemical properties of which vary because of wide inter-strain differences within the species. Brezina et al. (1987) partially purified four extracellular proteinases from B. linens, with pH and temperature optima of 5.0-8.0 and 50 ~ respectively. Hayashi et al. (1990) purified five extracellular proteinases from B. linens F (designated A, B, C, D and E), having a molecular mass of 37, 37, 44, 127 and 325 kDa, respectively, as determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Proteinases A and B were stable at 35 ~ for 1 h and had a temperature optimum of 40 ~ while proteinases C, D and E were stable at 45 ~ for 1 h and had a temperature optimum of 50 ~ All five proteinases were optimally active at pH 11.0 and were serine proteinases. The production of multiple forms of the extracellular proteinases by B. linens ATCC 9172 is a result of aggregation of subunits and autocatalytic degradation (Buchinger et al., 2001). An extracellular serine proteinase partially purified from a strain of B. linens (Laktoflora 200), had a molecular mass of 52-55 kDa, as determined by SDSPAGE, and pH and temperature optima of 7.0-8.5 and
45 ~ respectively (Juh~isz and Sk~irka, 1990). A thermostable proteinase was partially purified from B. linens IDM 376; it had molecular mass of 18.5 kDa and pH and temperature optima of 7.5 and 67.5 ~ respectively, on azocasein (Clancy and O'Sullivan, 1993). An extracellular serine proteinase purified from B. linens ATCC 9174 had a molecular mass of 126 kDa, as determined by SEC and was optimally active at pH 8.5 and 50 ~ (Rattray et al., 1995). It hydrolysed Otsl-casein at His8mGln9, Ser161mGly162 and either Glnlr2mTyr173 or Phe23m Phe24 (Rattray et al., 1996) and [3-casein at Serls~Ser19, Glu20~Glu21, Gln56~Sers7, Gln72~Asn73, Leu77~Thr78, Alal01~ Met102, Phe119~Thr120, Leu139mLeu140, Ser142~Trp143, His145~Gln146, Gln167~Ser168, Gln175~Lys176, Tyr180~Pro181 and Phe190~Leu191 (Rattray et al., 1997). One of the five extracellular enzymes of B. linens ATCC 9172 was purified to homogeneity by Tomaschov~i et al. (1998) using ion-exchange chromatography and native preparative PAGE. The enzyme had nearly identical properties to the serine proteinase of /3. linens ATCC 9174 purified by Rattray etal. (1995). Its molecular mass was estimated to be 56 kDa by SDSPAGE and pH and temperature optima were 8.0 and 50 ~ respectively. B. linens also produces extracellular aminopeptidases, intracellular peptidases and proteinases. Sorhaug (1981) reported the presence of intracellular dipeptidase activity in six strains of B. linens. The presence of three extracellular aminopeptidases in B. linens (Laktoflora 200), having pH and temperature optima of 7.0-9.0 and 30 ~ respectively, was reported by Brezina et al. (1987). Two extracellular aminopeptidases, designated A and B, with a molecular mass of estimated to be 150 and 110 kDa, respectively, and pH and temperature optima of 9.3 and 40 ~ respectively, were purified from B. linens F by Hayashi and Law (1989). Ezzat et al. (1993) reported the presence of cell wall proteinases and dipeptidase activities in B. linens CNRZ 944. The authors partially purified the cell wall proteinase, which had maximum activity at pH 6.5 and 40 ~ An intracellular aminopeptidase from B. linens ATCC 9174, with a molecular mass of 59 kDa, as determined by SDSPAGE, and 69 kDa by SEC, was reported by Rattray and Fox (1997). The enzyme was optimally active at pH 8.5 and 35 ~ Curtin et al. (2002) showed aminopeptidase, dipeptidase and tripeptidase activities in brevibacteria, corynebacteria, staphylococci and brachybacteria, isolated from smear surface-ripened cheeses, Tilsit and Gubeen. Species of the genus Arthrobacter are major components of the microflora of surface mould-ripened cheeses, such as Brie and Camembert and red-smear
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening 415 cheeses. However, the enzymes of Arthrobacter have not been well studied. Smacchi et al. (1999a) purified two extracellular serine proteinases from A. nicotianae 9458, with molecular masses of about 53-55 and 70-72 kDa, as determined by SDS-PAGE. The enzymes were optimally active at 55-60 and 37 ~ respectively. Both enzymes were optimally active in the pH range of 9.0-9.5 and preferentially hydrolysed [3-casein over Otsl-casein. An extracellular PepI from A. nicotianae 9458 with a molecular mass of about 53 kDa, was purified and characterized by Smacchi et al. (1999b). The enzyme was optimally active at 37 ~ and 8.0. Some Micrococcus spp. are very proteolytic and produce extracellular proteinases and intracellular proteinases and peptidases (Fox et al., 1993). Nath and Ledford (1972) reported that extracellular proteinases from certain micrococci preferentially hydrolysed Otslcasein; production of extracellular proteinase was also reported by Garcia de Fernando and Fox (1991). Bhowmik and Marth (1989) purified and characterized an aminopeptidase, with broad substrate specificity, from M. freudenreichii ATCC 407. Propionibacterium spp. are weakly proteolytic, but they are highly peptidolytic, especially on proline-containing peptide bonds, thus contributing to the characteristic flavour of Swiss-type cheeses (see 'Cheese with Propionic Acid Fermentation', Volume 2). Biochemical characteristics of peptidases from propionic acid bacteria have been reviewed by Gagnaire et al. (1999). A PepX with a molecular mass of 84 kDa and pH and temperature optima of 7.0 and 40 ~ respectively, was purified and characterized from P. freudenreichii subsp, shermanii NCDO 853 by Fernandez-Espla and Fox (1997). Endopeptidases have been isolated from P. freudenreichii subsp, shermanii and characterized (Table 1) (Tobiassen et al., 1996; Stepaniak et al., 1998b).
Patterns of Proteolysis in Cheese The pattern of proteolysis in many varieties may be summarized as follows: the caseins are hydrolysed initially by residual coagulant activity retained in the curd and by plasmin (and perhaps other indigenous proteolytic enzymes) to a range of large and intermediate-sized peptides which are hydrolysed by proteinases and peptidases from the starter LAB, NSLAB and perhaps secondary microflora to shorter peptides and amino acids. However, the pattern and extent of proteolysis varies considerably between varieties due to differences in manufacturing practices (particularly cooking temperature), which cause differences in moisture content, residual coagulant activity, activation of plasminogen to
plasmin, and possibly the development of a highly proteolytic secondary microflora and ripening time. The extent of proteolysis (i.e., the degree to which the caseins and peptides therefrom are hydrolysed and measured by the development of water- or pH 4.6soluble N) in cheese varies from very limited (e.g., Mozzarella) to very extensive (e.g., Blue) and is summarized for many varieties in Table 2. The pattern of proteolysis (i.e., the relative concentrations of different peptides and amino acids) is very variable and is essentially unique to a particular variety. The differences in soluble N content are due to differences in moisture content, temperature and pH, length of ripening, cooking temperature and pH at draining (Fox and McSweeney, 1996) and is mainly due to the action of chymosin and to a lesser extent of plasmin (Fox and McSweeney, 1997). A short ripening period ( - 3 weeks) and extensive denaturation of chymosin during the high temperature ( - 7 0 ~ stretching step during the manufacture of Mozzarella cheese explain the low level of soluble N, whereas extensive proteolysis is characteristic of Blue cheese and some smear-ripened varieties, caused by the action of chymosin, plasmin and proteinases from their characteristic secondary microflora. In addition, differences in the action of these proteolytic agents cause differences in peptide profiles. Primary proteolysis is similar during the ripening of most cheeses; chymosin hydrolyses the Phe23--Phe24 bond of Otsl-casein (Hill et al., 1974; Caries and Ribadeau-Dumas, 1985) except in cheeses that are cooked at a high temperature ( - 5 5 ~ e.g., Swiss cheese), in which plasmin is the principal proteolytic agent. In blue-veined cheeses, after sporulation, enzymes from P. roqueforti hydrolyse Otsl-CN (f24-199) and other peptides, changing the peptide profile (Gripon, 1993). Analysis of the water-insoluble fraction of various cheeses by urea-PAGE gives insight into the differences in peptide profile between cheeses (Fig. 12). In many cheeses, Otsl-casein is hydrolysed faster than [3-casein (Sousa et al., 2001). In Blue-veined cheeses, both Ors1- and [3-caseins are completely hydrolysed at the end of ripening. In Swiss-type cheeses, [3-casein is hydrolysed faster than Otsl-casein, with concomitant increases in y-caseins, indicating a role of plasmin and denaturation of chymosin during cooking. However, Ot~l-CN (f24-199) is produced slowly in Swiss cheese, indicating either the survival of some chymosin during cooking or the activity of indigenous milk acid proteinase, cathepsin D (Gagnaire et al., 2001), which has specificity similar to chymosin (Hurley et al., 2000a). In the case of Camembert-type cheese, about - 2 0 % of total N is soluble at pH 4.6 (Khidr, 1995) (Table 2) and the pattern of proteolysis is similar to Cheddar cheese (Fig. 12). During the ripening of Mozzarella
416
Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening Table 2 Soluble N as % of total nitrogen in different cheese varieties Cheese
Age
SN/'IN %
References
Mozzarella
25 days
4-5
Quarg Gouda
4 weeks 6 weeks 24 weeks 1 month
Somerset al. (2002) O'Reilly et al. (2002) Guinee et al. (1998) Mara and Kelly (1998) Messens et al. (1999) Exterkate and Alting (1995) Michalski et aL (2003) Sousa and McSweeney (2001) Khidr (1995)
Swiss Feta
16 weeks 2-6 months
--~12 12-13 23-25 Surface 15-17 Core 9-12 Surface---20 Core ---12 16-17 17-20
Mahon Cheddar
II
C
OH
I CH--CH 3 I CH3 o~-Keto-isovalerate
Figure 8 Transamination of the branched-chain amino acids to their corresponding c~-keto acids.
active on leucine, although it was also, but less, active on the aromatic amino acids (Yvon et al., 1997), while that of Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris B78 catalysed the transamination of valine, isoleucine and leucine (Engels, 1997). A branched-chain aminotransferase from Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris NCDO 763 was characterised by Yvon et al. (2000). The enzyme catalysed the transamination of the three branched-chain amino acids and was active under cheese-ripening conditions, although it had pH and temperature optima of 7.5 and 35-40 ~ respectively. Since the enzyme has a role in the degradation of isoleucine and valine, as well as in the transamination of leucine and methionine and was active under conditions similar to those found in cheese during ripening, the authors concluded that the enzyme was involved in flavour development. The branched-chain aminotransferase of Lc. lactis LM0230 has been cloned and sequenced (Atiles et al., 2000). The enzyme has broad specificity, being active on isoleucine, leucine, valine, methionine and phenylalanine.
Lb. paracasei subsp, paracasei LCO 1 produces at least one aminotransferase, capable of transaminating branched-chain amino acids, which was most active on isoleucine and leucine (Hansen et al., 2001). Responsesurface methodology showed that leucine concentration had a negligible effect on aminotransferase activity, while too high a concentration of ot-ketoglutarate could inhibit the enzyme. Ayad et al. (2001a) studied the effects of combining selected lactococci on flavour formation in milk. A chocolate-like flavour was produced by a combination of Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris NIZO131157 and Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris SKl l0. The authors speculated that this flavour was due to branched-chain aldehydes produced from branched-chain amino acids. Subsequently, Ayad etal. (2001b) studied the flavour-generating ability of wild lactococci isolated from artinsanal and non-dairy sources (fermented raw goats', sheep's and cows' milk, as well as from soil, grass, silage and the udder) in milk and in a cheese model. The authors believed that these wild
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
strains may be able to produce more flavour compounds in cheese than the industrial strains currently used in cheesemaking. The majority of wild strains produced different flavours from industrial strains. Methylated alcohols and methylated aldehydes, probably produced from branched-chain amino acids, were the main volatile compounds formed. It was concluded that wild strains could be used for the development of new cheeses or to alter the flavour of existing types of cheese. However, since the non-dairy wild strains had no proteolytic activity, they would be unable to grow in and acidify cheese milk and would have to be combined with industrial starters. The catabolism of leucine by propionic acid bacteria was investigated by Thierry et al. (2002). P.freudenreichii catabolised leucine to ot-ketoisocaproic acid, but only if ot-ketoglutarate was present. The bacterium also converted ot-ketoisocaproic acid to isovaleric acid via oxidative decarboxylation by ot-ketoacid dehydrogenase activity yielding an acyl-CoA derivative which was then converted to the acid. The authors noted that the catabolism of branched-chain amino acids by P. freudenreichii was different to the catabolism of branched-chain amino acids by lactococci.
Dearninases There are two types of deamination involving redox reactions (Hemme et al., 1982), differing according to the nature of hydrogen acceptor: 9 Dehydrogenases (EC 1.4.1) which utilise NAD + as the co-enzyme. The general reaction catalysed by these enzymes is: L-amino acid + H20 + NAD + ---* ot-keto acid + NH4 + + NADH These reactions can produce compounds such as pyruvic acid and ot-ketoglutaric acid from alanine and glutamic acid, respectively. 9 Oxidases which use oxygen as hydrogen acceptor. L-amino acid oxidases (EC 1.4.3.2) produce ot-keto acids according to the following reaction: L-amino acid + 02--+ ot-keto acid + NH3 + H202 L-amine oxidases (EC 1.4.3.6) according to the reaction:
form aldehydes
Amine + O2--+ aldehyde + NH3 + H202 Ammonia, a product of these deamination reactions, is an important constituent of the flavour of cheeses such as Camembert, Gruyere and Comte and
449
contributes to an increase in pH during ripening (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000). Microorganisms from the smear surface have deaminating ability, e.g., G. candidum (see Fox and Wallace, 1997), while B. linens produces large quantities of ammonia from serine, glutamine, asparagine and threonine. However, most strains of coryneform bacteria from smear cheese were found to have low deaminating activity except on serine, glutamine and asparagine (Hemme et al., 1982). Williams et al. (2001) studied the deaminating ability of LAB isolated from mature Cheddar. Deaminase activity was not widespread in the isolates but this may have been due to the insensitivity or lack of specificity of the assay method used.
Decarboxylases Decarboxylation is the conversion of an amino acid to the corresponding amine with the removal of CO2. Decarboxylases generally have an acid pH optimum (---pH 5.5) and usually require PLP as a coenzyme (Hemme et al., 1982). Amines generally have strong and often unpleasant aromas, as evident in certain smearripened cheese types (Fox and McSweeney, 1996). In addition, many amines (e.g., tyramine, histamine, tryptamine, putrescine, cadaverine and phenylethylamine) cause adverse physiological effects ('biogenic amines'; see 'Toxins in Cheese', Volume 1). The relative concentration of amines in cheese depends on the type of cheese and its microflora (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000). The relative concentration of some amines does not compare with that of the parent amino acid, which may be due to differences in the rates of conversion of amino acids (Adda et al., 1982). Most amines in cheese can be formed by decarboxylation, as is the case with the production of tyramine from tyrosine and histamine from histidine. However, the formation of secondary and tertiary amines cannot be explained readily (Fox and McSweeney, 1996). Joosten (1988) studied factors that affect the concentrations of biogenic amines formed in cheese. It was observed that in Gouda cheese, a higher pH, combined with a storage temperature of 21 ~ caused an increase in concentration of histamine, as did low saltin-moisture. Starter type and pasteurisation of milk did not appear to affect the formation of histamine. The role of non-starter bacteria in the formation of biogenic amines in cheese was examined by Joosten and Northolt (1987) who investigated the decarboxylase activity of bacteria including lactobacilli, enterococci, enterobacteriaccae and pediococci. Some strains of lactobacilli could form biogenic amines in cheese. Since the number of enterococcal cells required to produce significant amounts of tyramine is rarely reached
450
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
in cheese, these bacteria are not important for amine formation in Dutch cheese, although this may not be true for certain artisanal cheeses for which enterococci are a major part of the starter. The authors concluded that non-starter lactobacilli were the most important agents in Dutch cheese for the formation of biogenic amines. This is in agreement with the findings of Broome et al. (1990) who reported that the concentrations of tyramine and histamine in cheeses inoculated with lactobacilli were twice as high as in control cheeses, indicating that decarboxylases of lactobacilli have a role in their production. Novella-Rodriguez et al. (2002a) studied the effect of defined-strain starters on the production of amines in goats' milk cheese during ripening. The main amines found were tyramine (94.59 mg kg- 1), putrescine and tryptamine. The effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the production of amines in goats' milk cheese was studied by Novella-Rodriguez et al. (2002b) who found maximum production of amines when the cheeses were treated at 50 MPa for 72 h; rates of production were lower when cheeses received higher pressure treatments (400 MPa for 5 min or 400 MPa for 5 min followed by 50 MPa for 72 h) and in the untreated control cheeses. In addition to being involved in the production of amines, B. linens is able to reduce the amounts of histamine and tyramine in cheese during ripening (Leuschner and Hammes, 1998). During the four weeks of ripening of Munster cheese, B. linens reduced the histamine and tyramine content by 55-70%. Degradation of amines occurs at the surface of the cheese but the concentration of amines on the surface and interior differed only slightly after inoculation with B. linens LTH456. It was suggested that the concentration gradient was removed by diffusion of amines, leading to a decrease in the concentration of biogenic amines in the interior of the cheese. Lactobacilli used as cheese starter adjuncts were incubated by Gummalla and Broadbent (1999) in a defined medium containing L-tryptophan under carbohydrate starvation (CS), or under near-cheese ripening conditions (a chemically defined medium containing 4% salt, at pH 5.2). The specific activity of the tryptophan decarboxylases from Lb. casei strains was lower than those of the corresponding enzymes from Lb. helveticus strains. Generally, activity in either strain did not vary significantly with time or incubation conditions. Twenty-two Lb. plantarurn strains and seven strains of Lb. casei had no decarboxylase activity on methionine (Amarita et al., 2001). The combined effects of temperature, pH and salt on the growth of E. faecalis EF37, its proteolytic activity and its ability to produce biogenic amines were studied by
Gardini et al. (2001) who observed that 2-phenylethylamine accounted for more than half of the total content of biogenic amines. The production of biogenic amines was found to be independent of the incubation temperature and in general, was very low at the higher NaC1 concentration and was increased by lower pH. Roig-Sagues et al. (2002) studied the ability of 694 strains of bacteria isolated from Spanish artisanal cheeses to produce histamine and tyramine. Tyramineforming activity (mainly by enterococci and some other LAB) was found more frequently than histamine-forming activity, which was formed mainly by enterobacteria, but also by small numbers of other LAB. Most of the tyramine-forming strains of LAB were isolated from cheeses containing the highest levels of tyramine. However, histamine-forming LAB were generally isolated from samples with a low level of histamine. The amount of tyramine found in the samples was significantly higher than that of histamine. The distribution of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylases in 326 bacteria (four species of E. coli, Erwinia herbicola, Serratia plymuthicum, two species of Proteus, Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus natto, Achrombacter hartlebii, 11 species of Micrococcus, one Staphylococcus, three Sarcina spp., Brevibacterium ammoniagenes, Bacterium cadaveris and three Pseudomonas spp.) was studied by Nakazawa etal. (1977). Micrococcaceae were observed to have the highest decarboxylase activity on L-tryptophan, S-hydroxy-L-tryptophan and L-phenylalanine. The amino acid decarboxylase of M. percitreus was reported by this author to be involved in synthesis of aromatic amines such as dopamine and tyramine. A histidine decarboxylase, which did not require PLP as a coenzyme, has been purified from Lactobacillus 30a (Chang and Snell, 1968). The substrates of the enzyme were found to have a heterocyclic nitrogen atom at the same position relative to its alanyl side chain which may be important in the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex. Jetten and Sinskey (1995) studied a decarboxylase isolated from a strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum with activity on oxaloacetate. The enzyme, which catalysed the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate only, a key intermediate in carbon metabolism, had optimum activity between pH 7.0 and 7.5. A glutamate decarboxylase was isolated from Lb. brevis IFO 12005 by Ueno et al. (1997) and was found to be a dimer. Temperature and pH optima were 30 ~ and 4.2, respectively. The enzyme could not decarboxylate any other amino acid assayed. Lucas and Lonvaud-Funel (2002) purified the tyrosine decarboxylase of Lb. brevis lOEB 9809. The enzyme had features typical of pyridoxal phosphate-dependent amino acid decarboxylases although this enzyme was
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
not related by sequence homology to any known tyrosine decarboxylase.
Catabolism of Other Amino Acids Goux et al. (1995) investigated aspartate catabolism in an effort to understand ammonia generation by E. coli. It was reported that arginine may be an intermediate in aspartate catabolism, and may also be an intermediate for ammonia production from aspartate during nitrogen-limited growth. Hayashi et al. (1993) compared an aspartate aminotransferase with the aromatic amino acid aminotransferase of E. coli. Both enzymes were composed of two identical "--43.5 kDa subunits, and contained one molecule of PLP per subunit. An aspartate aminotransferase isolated from Lc. lactis LM0230 was cloned and characterised by Dudley and Steele (2001). It was determined using homologous recombination that a mutation in the Asp biosynthetic pathway prevented this strain from growing in milk. According to Kaneoke et al. (1993), at least seven I_-arginine degradation pathways are known, and in some species, more than one of these pathways can be operational. These authors studied the arginine oxygenase pathway in two coryneforms, Arthrobacter globiformis IFO 12137 (ATCC 8010) and B. helvolum IFO 12073. This pathway involves four enzymes and produces succinate from L-arginine (Fig. 9). This pathway in the coryneforms studied is not identical to other pathways reported, e.g., the pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus faecalis. E. coli utilises the ammonia-producing succinyl transferase pathway for arginine catabolism, and to a lesser degree, the arginine decarboxylase pathway (Schneider et al., 1998).
Arginine
Agmatine
Citrulline
N-carbamoylputrescine
.12 Ornithine
~
Putrescine
Figure 9 Pathways of arginine metabolism in bacteria (Arena and Manca de Nadra, 2001). (1) Arginine deiminase, (2) Catabolic ornithine transcarbamylase, (3) Arginine decarboxylase, (4) Agmatine deiminase, (5) Agmatinase, (6) N-carbamoylputrescine hydrolase, (7) Ornithine decarboxylase, (8) Anabolic system.
451
Lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine can catabolise arginine by at least two pathways (Arena et al., 1999). The arginine deiminase pathway produces orthinine, CO2 and NH3 via three enzymatic reactions. The enzymes involved in this pathway are arginine deiminase (EC 3.5.3.6), catabolic ornithine transcarbamoylase (EC 2.1.3.3) and carbamate kinase (EC 2.7.2.2) (Champomier Verges et al., 1999). Alternatively, the arginase-urease pathway leads to the production of urea. Arginine deiminase, ornithine transcarbamoylase and carbamate kinase from the sourdough microorganism, Lb. sanfranciscencis CB1, were isolated by de Angelis et al. (2003). The enzymes had acidic pH optima and were optimally active at 30-37 ~ Interestingly, arginine has been proposed as a possible growth substrate for the secondary microflora of Swiss cheese (Laht et al., 2002); calculations showed that ATP available from the metabolism of arginine to ornithine was theoretically sufficient to support the growth of non-starter bacteria to populations of 108 cfu g-1 The catabolism of threonine, asparagine, arginine and glutamate in cheese has attracted some study. Aminotransferase or dehydrogenase activities catabolise glutamate to produce ot-ketoglutarate, while y-aminobutyrate is formed from glutamate by the action of a decarboxylase. Threonine is converted to acetaldehyde and glycine (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000). The specific pathways for the catabolism of other amino acids (e.g., glycine, alanine and serine) by cheese-related microorganisms have attracted little attention.
References Adda, J., Gripon, J.C. and Vassal, L. (1982). The chemistry of flavour and texture generation in cheese. Food Chem. 9, 115-129. Alting, A.C., Engels W.J.M., van Schalkwijk, S. and Exterkate, EA. (1995). Purification and characterisation of cystathionine [3-1yase from Lactococcus lactis subsp. crernoris B78 and its possible role in flavor development in cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 4037-4042. Amarita, E, Requena, T., Taborda, G., Amigo, L. and Pelaez, C. (2001). Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum initiate catabolism of methionine by transamination. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90, 971-978. Amarita, E, Martinez-Cuesta, C.M., Taborda, G., Soto-Yarritu, P.L., Requena, T. and Paleaz, C. (2002). Formation of methional by Lactococcus lactis IFPL730 under cheese model conditions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 214, 58-62. Arena, M.E. and Manca de Nadra, M.C. (2001). Biogenic amine production by Lactobacillus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 90, 158-162. Arena, M.E., Saguir, EM. and Manca de Nadra, M.C. (1999). Arginine, citrulline and ornithine metabolism by lactic acid bacteria from wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 152, 155-161.
452
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
Arfi, K., Spinnler, H.-E., Tache, R. and Bonnarme, P. (2002). Production of volatile compounds by cheese-ripening yeasts: requirement for a methanethiol donor for S-methyl thioacetate synthesis by Kluyveromyces lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58, 503-510. Atiles, M.V., Dudley, E.G. and Steele, J.L. (2000). Gene cloning, sequencing and inactivation of the branched chain aminotransferase of Lactococcus lactis LM0230. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 2325-2329. Aubel, D., Germond, J.E., Gilbert, C. and Atlan, D. (2002). Isolation of the patC gene encoding the cystathionine beta-lyase of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus and molecular analysis of inter-strain variability in enzyme biosynthesis. Microbiol. 148, 2029-2036. Ayad, E.H.E., Verheul, A., Engels, W.J.M., Wouters, J.J.M. and Smit, G. (2001a). Enhanced flavor formation by combination of selected lactococci from industrial and artisanal origin with focus on completion of a metabolic pathway. J. AppI. Microbiol. 90, 59-67. Ayad, E.H.E., Verheul, A., Engels, W.J.M., Wouters, J.J.M. and Smit, G. (2001b). Flavour forming abilities and amino acid requirements of Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from artisanal and non-dairy origin. Int. Dairy J. 9, 725-735. Banks, J.M., Yvon, M., Gripon, J.C., de la Fuente, M.A., Brechany, E.Y., Williams, A.G. and Muir, D.D. (2001). Enhancement of amino acid catabolism in Cheddar cheese using c~-ketoglutarate: amino acid degradation in relation to volatile compounds and aroma character. Int. Dairy J. 11, 215-243. Belitz, H.-D. and Grosch, W. (1987). Food Chemistry SpringerVerlag, Heidelberg. Berger, C., Khan, J.A., Molimard, P., Martin, N. and Spinnler, H.E. (1999). Production of sulfur flavors by ten strains of Geotrichum candidum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5510-5514. Bonnarme, P., Psoni, L. and Spinnler, H.E. (2000). Diversity of L-methionine catabolism pathways in cheese-ripening bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5514-5517. Bonnarme, P., Arfi, K., Duty, C., Helinch, S., Yvon, M. and Spinnler, H.-E. (2001a). Sulfur compounds production by Geotrichum candidum from L-methionine: importance of the transamination step. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 205, 247-252. Bonnarme, P., Lapadatescu, C., Yvon, M. and Spinnler, H.-E. (2001b). L-Methionine degradation potentialities of cheeseripening microorganisms. J. Dairy Res. 68, 663-674. Broome, M.C., Krause, D.A. and Hickey, M.W. (1990). The use of non-starter lactobacilli in Cheddar cheese manufacture. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 45, 67-73. Bruinenberg, P.G., de Roo, G. and Limsowtin, G.K.Y. (1997). Purification and characterisation of cystathionine y-lyase from Lactococcus lactis subsp, cremoris SK11: possible role in flavor compound formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 561-566. Champomier Verges, M.-C., Zurliga, M., Moret Deville, E, Perez-Martinez, G., Zagorec, M. and Ehrlich, S.D. (1999). Relationships between arginine degradation, pH and survival of Lactobacillus sake. FEMS Micobiol. Lett. 180, 297-304.
Chang, G.W. and Snell, E.E. (1968). Histidine decarboxylase of Lactobacillus 30a. II. Purification, substrate specificity and stereospecificity. Biochemistry 7, 2005-2012. Collin, J.C. and Law, B.A. (1989). Isolation and characterisation of the L-methionine-y-demethiolase from Brevibacterium linens BCDO739. Sci. Aliment. 9,805-812. Curtin, A.C., Gobbetti, M. and McSweeney, P.L.H. (2002). Peptidolytic, esterolytic and amino acid catabolic activities of selected bacterial strains from the surface of smear cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 76, 231-240. de Angelis, M., Curtin, A.C., McSweeney, P.L.H., Faccia, M. and Gobbetti, M. (2002). Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016: purification and characterization of a cystathionine gamma-lyase and use as adjunct starter in cheesemaking. J. Dairy Res. 69, 255-267. de Angelis, M., Mariotti, L., Rossi, J., Servilli, M., Fox, P.E, Rollan, G. and Gobbetti, M. (2003). Arginine catabolism by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: Purification and characterization of the arginine deiminase pathway enzymes from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 6193-6201. Demarigny, Y., Berger, C., Desmasures, N., Gueguen, M. and Spinnler, H.-E. (2000). Flavour sulphides produced from methionine by two different pathways by Geotrichum candidum. J. Dairy Res. 67, 371-380. Dias, B. and Weimer, B. (1998a). Conversion of methionine to thiols by lactococci, lactobacilli and brevibacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3320-3326. Dias, B. and Weimer, B. (1998b). Purification and characterisation of L-methionine y-lyase from Brevibacterium linens BL2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3327-3331. Dias, B. and Weimer, B. (1999). Production of volatile sulfur compounds in Cheddar cheese slurries. Int. Dairy J. 9, 605-611. Dobric, N., Limsowtin, G.K.Y., Hillier, A.J., Dudman, N.P.B. and Davidson, B.E. (2000). Identification and characterisation of a cystathionine [3/y-lyase from Lactococcus lactis subsp, cremoris MG1363. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 182, 249-254. Dudley, E.G. and Steele, J.L. (2001). Lactococcus lactis LM0230 contains a single aminotransferase involved in aspartate biosynthesis, which is essential for growth in milk. Microbiology 147,215-224. Dunn, H.C. and Lindsay, R.C. (1985). Evaluation of the role of microbial Strecker-derived aroma compounds in uncleantype flavors in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 2859-2874. Dwivedi, C.M., Ragin, R.C. and Uren, J.R. (1982). Cloning, purification and characterisation of [3-cystathionase from Escherichia coll. Biochemistry 21, 3064-3069. Engels, W.J.M. (1997). Flavour Formation in Cheese-like Systems: Role of Methionine-degrading Enzymes from Lactococci. PhD Thesis, University of Waginengen, The Netherlands. Ferchichi, M., Heroine, D., Nardi, M. and Pamboukdjian, M. (1985). Production of methanethiol from methionirle by Brevibacterium linens CNRZ 918. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, 715-723. Fernandez, M., van Doesburg, W., Rutten, G.A.M., Marugg, J.D., Alting, A.C., van Kranenburg, R. and Kupers, O.P.
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
(2000). Molecular and functional analysis of the metC gene of Lactococcus lactis, encoding cystathionine [3-1yase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 42-48. Fox, P.E and McSweeney, P.L.H. (1996). Chemistry, biochemistry and control of cheese flavour, in, Proc. 4th Cheese Symposium, Teagasc, Moorepark. pp. 135-159. Fox, P.E and Wallace, J.M. (1997). Formation of flavor compounds in cheese. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 45, 17-85. Gao, S. and Steele, J.L. (1998). Purification and characterisation of oligomeric species of an aromatic amino acid transferase from Lactococccus lactis subsp, lactis $3. J. Food Biochem. 22, 197-211. Gao, S., Oh, D.H., Broadbent, J.R., Johnson, M.E., Weimer, B.C. and Steele, J.C. (1997). Aromatic amino acid catabolism by lactococci. Lait 77,371-381. Gao, S., Mooberry, E.S. and Steele, J.L. (1998). Use of 13C nuclear magnetic resonance and gas chromatography to examine methionine catabolism by lactococci. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4670-4675. Gardini, E, Marmscelli, M., Caruso, M.C., Galgano, E, Crudele, M.A., Favati, E, Guerzoni, M.E., Suzzi, G. (2001). Effects of pH, temperature and NaC1 concentration on the growth kinetics, proteolytic activity and biogenic amine production of Enterococcus faecalis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 64, 105-117. Goux, W.J., Strong, A.A.D, Schneider, B.L., Lee, W.N.D. and Reitzer, L.J. (1995). Utilization of aspartate as a nitrogen source in Escherichia coll. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 638-646. Gummalla, S. and Broadbent, J.R. (1999). Tryptophan catabolism by Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus helveticus cheese flavor adjuncts. J. Dairy Sci. 2070-2077. Gummalla, S. and Broadbent, J.R. (2001). Tryptophan and phenylalanine catabolism by Lactobacillus cheese flavor adjuncts. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1011-1019. Hansen, B.V., Houlberg, U. and Ardo, Y. (2001). Transamination of branched-chain amino acids by a cheese related Lactobacillus paracasei strain. Int. Dairy J. 11, 225-233. Hayashi, H., Inoue, K., Nagata, T., Kuramitsu, S. and Kagamiyama, H. (1993). Escherichia coli aromatic amino acid aminotransferase: characterisation and comparision with aspartate aminotransferase. Biochemistry 32, 12229-12239. Hemme, D., Bouillane, C., Metro, E and Desmazeaud, M.J. (1982). Microbial catabolism of amino acids during cheese ripening. Sci. Aliment. 2, 113-123. Jetten, M.S.M. and Sinskey, A.J. (1995). Purification and properties of oxaloacetate decarboxylase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 67, 221-227. Jollivet, N., Bezenger, M.C., Vayssier, Y. and Belin, J.M. (1992). Production of volatile compounds in liquid cultures by 6 strains of coryneform bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36, 790-794. Joosten, H.M.L.J. (1988). Conditions allowing the formation of biogenic amines in cheese. 3. Factors influencing the amounts formed. Neth. Milk DairyJ. 41,329-357. Joosten, H.M.L.J. and Northoh, M.D. (1987). Conditions allowing the formation of biogenic amines in cheese. 2. Decarboxylative properties of some non-starter bacteria. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 40, 259-280.
453
Kaneoke, M., Shiota, K., Kusunose, M., Shimizu, E. and Yorifuji, T. (1993). Function of the arginine oxygenase pathway in utilization of L-arginine-related compounds in Arthrobacter globiformis and Brevibacterium helvolum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 57, 814-820. Klein, N., Maillard, M.-B., Thierry, A. and Lortal, S. (2001). Conversion of amino acids into aroma compounds by cell-free extracts of Lactobacillus helveticus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91,404-411. Laber, B., Clausen, T., Huber, R., Messerschmidt, A., Egner, U., Muller-Fahrnow, A. and Pohlenz, H.D. (1996). Cloning, purification and crystallisation of Escherichia coli cystathionine [3-1yase. FEBS Lett. 379, 94-96. Laht, T.M., Kask, S., Elias, P., Adamberg, K., Paalme, T. (2002). Role of arginine in the development of secondary microflora in Swiss-type cheese. Int. Dairy J. 12, 831-840. Lamberet, G., Auberger, B. and Bergere, J.L. (1997a). Aptitude of cheese bacteria for volatile S-methyl thioester synthesis. I. Effect of substrate and pH on their formation by Brevibacterium linens GC171. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47, 279-283. Lamberet, G., Auberger, B. and Bergere, J.L. (1997b). Aptitude of cheese bacteria for volatile S-methyl thioester synthesis. II. Comparison of coryneform bacteria, Micrococcaceae and some lactic acid bacteria starters. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48,393-397. Lee, C.W. and Desmazeaud, M.J. (1985). Utilisation of aromatic amino acids as nitrogen sources in Brevibacterium linens: an inducible aromatic amino acid aminotransferase. Arch. Microbiol. 140,331-337. Lee, C.W. and Richard, J. (1984). Catabolism of L-phenylalanine by some microorganisms of cheese origin. J. Dairy Res. 51, 461-469. Lee, C.W., Lucas, S. and Desmeaud, M.J. (1985). Phenylalanine and tyrosine catabolism in some cheese coryneform bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 26, 201-205. Leuschner, R.G.K. and Hammes, W.P. (1998). Degradation of histamine and tyramine by Brevibacterium linens during surface ripening of Munster cheese. J. Food Prot. 61, 874-878. Lockwood, B.C. and Coombs, G.H. (1991). Purification and characterisation of methionine -y-lyase from Trichomonas vaginalis. Biochem. J. 279,675-682. Lucas, P. and Lonvaud-Funel, A. (2002). Purification and partial gene sequence of the tyrosine decarboxylase of Lactobacillus brevis lOEB 9809. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 211, 85-89. Martinez-Cuesta, C., Ruquena, T. and Pelaez, C. (2002). Effect of bacteriocin-induced cell damage on the branched-chain amino acid transamination by Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 217, 109-113. McSweeney, P.L.H. and Sousa, M.J. (2000). Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheese during ripening: a review. Lait 80,293-324. Molimard, P. and Spinnler, H.E. (1996). Compounds involved in the flavor of surface mould-ripened cheeses: origins and properties. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 169-184. Nakazawa, H., Sano, K., Kumagai, H. and Yamada, H. (1977). Distribution and formation of aromatic L-amino
454
Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening
acid decarboxylase in bacteria. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41, 2241-2247. Nakayama, T., Esaki, N., Lee, W.J., Tanaka, I., Tanaka, H. and Soda, K. (1984). Purification and properties of k-methionine y-lyase from Aeromonas sp. Agric. Biol. Chem. 48, 2367-2369. Nierop Groot, M.N. and de Bont, J.A.M. (1998). Conversion of phenylalanine to benzaldehyde initiated by an aminotransferase in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3009-3013. Nierop Groot, M.N. and de Bont, J.A.M. (1999). Involvement of manganese in conversion of phenylalanine to benzaldehyde by lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5590-5593. Novella-Rodrtguez, S., Veciana-Nogues, M.T., Roig-Sagues, A.X., Trujillo-Mesa, A.J. and Vidal-Carou, M.C. (2002a). Influence of starter and nonstarter on the formation of biogenic amine in goat cheese during ripening. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 2471-2478. Novella-Rodriguez, S., Veciana-Nogues, M.T., Saldo, J. and Vidal-Carou, M.C. (2002b). Effects of high hydrostatic pressure treatments on biogenic amine contents in goat cheeses during ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 7288-7292. Rijnen, L., Bonneau, S. and Yvon, M. (1999a). Genetic characterisation of the major lactococcal aminotransferase and its involvement in conversion of amino acids to aroma compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4873-4880. Rijnen, L., Delacroix-Buchet, A., Demaizieres, D., Le Quere, J.L., Gripon, J.C. and Yvon, M. (1999b). Inactivation of lactococcal aromatic aminotransferase prevents the formation of floral aroma compounds from aromatic amino acids in semi-hard cheese. Int. Dairy J. 9,877-885. Rijnen, L., Courtin, P., Gripon, J.-C. and Yvon, M. (2000). Expression of a heterologous glutamate dehydrogenase gene in Lactococcus lactis highly improves the conversion of amino acids to aroma compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1354-1359. Roig-Sagues, A.X., Molina, A.P. and Hernandez-Herrerok, M.M. (2002). Histamine and tyramine-forming microorgamisms in Spanish traditional cheeses. Eur.. Food Res. Technol. 215, 96-100. Schneider, B.L., Kiupakis, A.K. and Reitzer, LJ. (1998). Arginine catabolism and the arginine succinyltransferase pathway in Escherichia coll. J. Bacteriol. 180, 4278-4286. Seefeldt, K.E. and Weimer, B. (2000). Diversity of sulfur compound production in lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2740-2746. Shakeel-Ur-Rehman and Fox, RE (2002). Effect of added ot-ketoglutaratic acid, pyruvic acid or pyridoxal phosphate on proteolysis and quality of Cheddar cheese. Food Chem. 76, 21-26. Smacchi, E. and Gobbetti, M. (1998). Purification and characterisation of cystathionine y-lyase from Lactobacillus fermentum DT41. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166, 197-202. Smit, G., van Hylckama Vlieg, J.E.T., Smit, B.A., Ayad, E.H.E. and Engels, W.J.M. (2002). Fermentative formation of flavour compounds by lactic acid bacteria. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 57, 61-68.
Soda, K., Tanaka, H. and Esaki, N. (1983). Multifunctional biocatalysis: methionine y-lyase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 8, 214-217. Tamman, J.D., Williams, A.G., Noble, J. and Lloyd, D. (2000). Amino acid fermentation in non-starter Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Cheddar cheese. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 3 70-3 74. Tanaka, H., Esaki, N., Yamamoto, T. and Soda, K. (1976). Purification and characterisation of methionase from Pseudomonas ovalis. FEBS Lett. 66,307-311. Tanaka, H., Esaki, N. and Soda, K. (1985). A versatile bacterial enzyme: k-methionine y-lyase. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 7,530-537. Thierry, A., Maillard, M.-B. and Yvon, M. (2002). Conversion of k-leucine to isovaleric acid by Propionibacterium freudenreichii TL34 and ITGP23. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68,608-615. Ueno, Y., Hayakawa, K., Takahashi, S. and Oda, K. (1997). Purification and characterization of glutamate decarboxylase from Lactobacillus brevis IFO 12005. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61, 1168-1171. Ummadi, M. and Weimer, B.C. (2001). Tryptophan catabolism in Brevibacterium linens as a potential cheese flavor adjunct. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1173-1182. Weimer, B., Dias, B., Ummadi, M., Broadbent, J., Brennand, C., Jaegi, J., Johnson, M., Miliani, E, Steele, J. and Sisson, D.V. (1997). Influence of NaC1 and pH on intracellular enzymes that influence Cheddar cheese ripening. Lait 77, 383-398. Weimer, B., Seefeldt, K. and Dias, B. (1999). Sulfur metabolism in bacteria associated with cheese. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76, 247-261. Williams, A.G., Noble, J. and Banks, J.M. (2001). Catabolism of amino acids by lactic acid bacteria isolated from Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 11,203-215. Williams, A.G., Noble, J., Tammam, T., Lloyd, D. and Banks, J.M. (2002). Factors affecting the activity of enzymes involved in peptide and amino acid catabolism in nonstarter lactic acid bacteria isolated from Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 12,841-852. Yamagata, S., D'Andrea, R.J., Fujisaki, S., Isaji, M. and Nakamura, N. (1993). Cloning and bacterial expression of the CYS3 gene encoding cystathionine y-lyase of Saccharomyces cerevisae and the physiochemical and enzymatic properties of the protein. J. Bacteriol. 175, 4800-4808. Yvon, M. and Rijnen, L. (2001). Cheese flavour formation by amino acid catabolism. Int. Dairy J. 11,185-201. Yvon, M., Thirouin, S., Rijnen, L., Fromentier, D. and Gripon, J.C. (1997). An aminotransferase from Lactococcus lactis initiates conversion of amino acids to cheese flavor compounds. Appl. Environ. Mirobiol. 63, 414-419. Yvon, M., Berthelot, S. and Gripon, J.C. (1998). Adding ot-ketoglutarate to semi-hard cheese curd highly enhances the conversion of amino acids to aroma compounds. Int. Dairy J. 8,889-898. Yvon, M., Chambellon, E., Bolotin, A. and Roudot-Algaron, E (2000). Characterisation and role of the branched chain aminotransferase (BcatT) isolated from Lactococcus lactis subsp, cremoris NCDO763. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 571-577.
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation C.M. Delahunty, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, UniversityCollege Cork, Ireland M.A. Drake, Department of Food Science, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
Introduction A remarkable variety of cheeses are made in all parts of the world where milk is produced. Cheeses are consumed for their highly regarded nutritional value, and enjoyed for their complex and varied eating quality. The sensory characteristics of cheeses, which determine their eating quality, are properties that are perceived by the human senses, predominantly during consumption. These properties can be described as appearance characteristics, flavour characteristics and texture characteristics. However, cheeses are complex foods, produced using milk from different animals, by many different techniques, and are presented in a variety of sizes, shapes, packages or coatings. Some cheeses are produced in small quantities, such as farmhouse types, sold in local markets and consumed by a relatively small number of people. Others are produced in large quantities in very large automated facilities, may find their way to markets in many different countries and are consumed by very many people. Some cheeses are ripened or matured for years before they are consumed; others are consumed young or unripened. Cheeses may have moulds of different types growing on their surface, may be pierced to allow blue moulds grow within the cheese, or include ingredients such as herbs and/or spices. This considerable diversity in cheesemaking practice, and the number of stages that any single cheese undergoes during its production, results in a wide variety of cheeses each of which has complex sensory characteristics. Sensory evaluation of cheese is absolutely necessary to determine the relative merits of cheesemaking procedures and the influence of measured composition on specific sensory characteristics of cheese. Sensory evaluation is also needed to determine the influence of sensory characteristics on the eating quality of cheese and its consumer acceptability. However, the complexity of cheese presents a considerable challenge for its sensory evaluation. This chapter will focus on human perception of sensory characteristics, on the advantages and disadvantages of sensory evaluation methods, on the intensity
and quality of the sensory characteristics of cheeses, and on the relationships between cheesemaking, cheese composition, cheese sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of cheese.
A Definition of Sensory Character Sensory characteristics of cheeses are human responses to perceptions of stimuli that are experienced with the cheeses, and can generally be described using terms defined within the categories of appearance, flavour and texture. Sensory characteristics result from interactions of the human sensory modalities of vision, touch, olfaction, gustation and mouthfeel with stimuli induced by rheological, structural and chemical components of the cheese. Sensory characteristics are perceived by consumers when they observe, manipulate, smell and take cheese into the mouth for consumption, and are subsequently expressed as a behavioural response using actions or descriptive terms. A majority of sensory characteristics are complex and are stimulated by the association of many different properties of the cheese, with different sensory modalities acting together. It is this complexity, or component balance, that hinders attempts to adequately represent cheese sensory character using instrumental or chemical analyses. In addition, and unfortunately from the sensory scientists' point of view, consumers differ from one another. Sensory perception, and particularly its communication, differs between individuals as a result of physiological, psychological, social and cultural differences.
Sensory Characteristics and Cheese Preferences Cheese quality has been defined for many years by manufacturers as cheese produced reliably and economically (Muir et al., 1995a). In the past, limited choices were available to consumers and as a result of this
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 1: General Aspects ISBN: 0-1226-3652-X Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
456
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
limited experience, the consumer's palate was less discerning. Today, cheese markets are international, and cheesemakers compete openly for consumers, offering them an eve>widening choice. Cheese consumers are more affluent and many have tasted or regularly consume a diversity of cheese types, leading them to become increasingly discerning. These consumers now define the quality standard for cheeses, which is ultimately determined by eating quality. The eating quality of cheese, or a consumer's liking for cheese, is an integrated response. The stimuli are the sensory characteristics, perceived before and during consumption. However, the response is influenced by other individual consumer-related factors that include sensory abilities, past experiences with cheese, what is expected from a cheese and when and where it will be consumed. Expectations are based on experience, but are created for a specific product by marketing, packaging and familiarity. Finally, liking for, and satisfaction with, a cheese is determined by the context in which it is consumed, and its appropriateness for that context (e.g., would one wish to consume Epoisses for breakfast?). Eating quality determines consumer acceptability and willingness to repeat purchase. Highly regarded eating quality is not that found in a cheese with no defects, but that which offers unique and appealing characteristics consistently. The producer of the cheese with the most acceptable sensory characteristics, if he is aware of this and can ensure that the market presentation of his cheese matches its sensory character, will have an advantage in the market. The concepts of 'healthy eating' and 'conscientious eating' (e.g., vegetarian and vegan diets) and environmentally friendly eating are now increasingly important to consumers. To meet these consumers' expectations, cheese producers are challenged to produce new, wholesome products that taste as good as traditional alternatives. This task is proving difficult as dietary guidelines for healthy eating may recommend reducing the intake of ingredients that provide desirable sensory character, such as fat or salt. The production of reduced- and low-fat cheeses to replace traditional types is an example of such consumer-driven product development. However, the majority of new low-fat cheeses do not meet the sensory quality requirements of discerning consumers (Mistry, 2001). This is because fat is not just a provider of desirable sensory character, but it is also important for cheese texture and body, for the development of compounds responsible for flavour and for the release of flavour compounds during consumption. It will be difficult to improve the eating quality of these cheeses unless eating quality is understood better.
Cheesemaking and the Variety of Sensory Character The sensory characteristics of a cheese at the time of its consumption reflect the milk from which it was produced (e.g., a goats' milk cheese is distinct from a cows' milk cheese), the processes used in its production and the physical and the chemical changes that occurred during maturation (e.g., proteolysis breaks down proteins to amino acids during cheese maturation, which may subsequently act as substrates for the formation of volatile compounds (see 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening', Volume 1)). Milk from the cow, sheep, goat, buffalo or other animals can be used as raw material, and its qualities are determined by breed, diet and stage of lactation. Treatment of milk before cheese production, particularly pasteurisation, can kill micro-organisms and reduce enzyme activity that could otherwise contribute to the development of sensory character during maturation. During cheese production, the coagulant used to form curds, the amount of salt added, the type of starter culture and the use of adjunct cultures will determine sensory characteristics. Finally, the maturation time and the temperature of maturation may be varied. The sensory characteristics of different types of cheese, and the potential variety that may be achieved, are determined by the choices the producer makes at each of the stages in production. Sensory characteristics of many different cheeses are described in the literature and in specialist cheese books. However, the sensory characteristics of relatively few types have been defined, standardised and measured objectively using sensory science methods. Lack of objective knowledge makes it difficult to compare accurately the sensory characteristics of different cheese types, but more importantly, as the cause of sensory characteristics is only partially known, it is difficult to compare accurately cheese appearance, texture and flavour research carried out in different laboratories. Tables 1 and 2 present terms used to describe the appearance, texture and flavour characteristics of cheeses that have been defined and standardised in an objective way. Table 3 presents terms used for descriptive sensory analysis by other researchers, but that have not been defined and standardised adequately. Similar terms are used in many cases even though each descriptive language referenced was developed independently by different research groups. In addition, in many cases, similar terms have been used to describe dominant characteristics of different cheese types. This comparison suggests that even though a remarkable variety of cheese types are produced, that potentially exhibit a wide variety of sensory characteristics, it should
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
457
Table 1 Terms used to describe the appearance and texture of cheese using descriptive analysis methods. Terms in this list were developed and defined by trained panels, and in many cases standard materials that help to illustrate the term are provided. Cheeses studied were low-fat, full-fat and smoked Swiss, Cheddar and Gouda (Adhikari etaL, 2003), natural and processed cheeses (Drake etaL, 1999a; Gwartney etaL, 2002), ten different types of cheese (Lawlor and Delahunty, 2000), Cheddar and Camembert (Cooper, 1987) and Mozzarella cheeses (Brown et aL, 2003)
Term Appearance Chalky Colour/colour intensity
Mottling Mouldy Open/openness Shiny
Texture Adhesiveness Chewy Cohesiveness Creamy/creaminess
Crumbly/crumbliness
Crustiness Curdiness Degree of breakdown Dry Firm/firmness
First-bite sticky Fracturability at first bite Grainy
Hardness Mealy Moist Mouth-coating Oily Rate of recovery Residual mouthfeel Residual smoothness of mouth coating
Definitiona
Resembling chalk in appearance The colour of Cheddar ranging from pale yellow to orange, the palest yellow representing the start of the scale The colour of cheese ranging from white to orange The evenness of colour shading within the cheese sample, with the most uniform coloured cheese being free from mottling, marbling or any other deficiencies in colour The degree of mouldiness/visible mould growth in the cheese structure The extent to which the interior of the cheese (that is the cut surface) is open, this encompasses cracks, pinholes, irregular-shaped holes and any other openings The extent to which the surface of the cheese is shiny, glossy, moist or sweaty-looking, as opposed to looking matt or dull The degree to which the chewed mass sticks to mouth surfaces, evaluated after five chews Requiring a good deal of mastication, toffee-like texture. Degree of chewing needed to break up the cheese The degree to which the chewed mass holds together, evaluated after five chews The extent to which the texture has broken down to a creamy semi-liquid texture, assessed between tongue and palate during mastication The feeling associated with heavy whipping cream (e.g., >30% fat content) The extent to which the cheese structure breaks up in the mouth, assessed during the first 2-3 chews The feeling in the mouth when the sample falls apart quickly in mouth during mastication The force required to break through the crust of the cheese when taking the first bite, assessed using the front teeth The extent to which a curdy or mealy texture is perceived in the mouth during mastication The amount of breakdown that occurs in the sample as a result of mastication, evaluated after five chews The degree of dryness or moistness sensed in the mouth during mastication Ranging from soft to firm. The extent of resistance offered by the cheese, assessed during the first five chews using the front teeth The force required to squeeze a cube (1.5 • 1.5 • 1.5 cm) of cheese flat between the first finger and thumb The amount of force required to take the first bite of cheese, assessed using the front teeth The amount of force required to completely bite through the cheese, assessed using the molars Sticky sensation experienced during the first bite Completely bite through the sample with the molars and evaluate the degree to which the sample fractures The extent to which granular structures are formed as the sample breaks down, perceived in the second half of chewing The feeling of coarse particles in the mouth during mastication The force required to bite the sample (first bite) The feeling in mouth when the sample breaks down in small pieces and it is difficult to gather them for swallowing The perceived moisture content of the cheese. Ranging from dry to moist The extent to which the cheese has a moist or wet texture around the palate during mastication The extent to which the cheese coats the palate and teeth during mastication The degree of coating on the tongue and the palate during mastication Oily, fatty, greasy mouth-feel of any kind Depress sample between thumb and first finger 30%, evaluate the speed or rate at which the sample returns to its original shape The degree of 'bittiness' or graininess in the mouth just before swallowing The degree of smoothness felt in the mouth after expectorating the sample
continued
458
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Table 1 continued Term
Definition a
Rubbery/rubberiness
The extent to which the cheese returns to its initial from after biting, assessed during the first 2-3 chews The degree of springiness experienced while biting the sample Of the nature of slime, soft, glutinous or viscous substance, soft, moist and sticky The smoothness of the cheese against the palate as it breaks up during mastication The degree to which the chewed mass surface is smooth, evaluated after five chews Yielding easily to pressure, easily moulded, pliable, easily spreadable Depress sample between thumb and first finger 30%, evaluate the total amount of recovery of the sample The stickiness of the cheese against the palate and around the teeth during mastication Overall sensation of stickiness during mastication The mouthfeel associated with consuming very viscous fluids like heavy whipping cream or honey
Slimy Smooth/smoothness Softness Springiness Sticky/stickiness Viscous
a The precise wording of some definitions has been changed to allow the use of consistent language in this table. However, the meaning of each definition is unchanged.
Table 2 Terms used to describe the flavour of cheese using descriptive analysis methods. Terms in this list were developed, defined and referenced using standard materials by trained panels. Cheeses studied were: Cheddar (Murray and Delahunty, 2000b; Drake et aL, 2001), low-fat, full-fat and smoked Swiss, Cheddar and Gouda (Adhikari et al., 2003), aged natural cheese of many types (Heisserer and Chambers, 1993), ewes' milk cheese (B~.rcenas et al., 1999) and cheese flavours (Stampanoni, 1994) Term
Definition a
S t a n d a r d b, c
Acid/yoghurt, acidic
The taste on the tongue associated with acids (citric, lactic... ) A sour, tangy, sharp, citrus-like taste. The fundamental taste sensations of which lactic and citric acids are typical Flavours indicating age in Cheddar cheese
0.35-0.86 g lactic acid/100 g Ricotta Fermented milk Natural yoghurt Citric acid (0.2% in water)
Age Ammonia Animal, animalic Astringent
Balanced
Bell pepper Biting
Bitter
Blue Brine
Brothy
The combination of aromatics reminiscent of farm animals and barnyards The complex of drying, puckering, shrinking sensations in the oral cavity causing contraction of the body tissues A mouth-drying and harsh sensation Mellow, smooth, clean. In equilibrium, wellarranged or disposed, with no constituent lacking or in excess Aroma associated with freshly cut green peppers The slightly burning, prickling and/or numbness of the tongue and/or mouth surface Fundamental taste sensation of which caffeine or quinine are typical A chemical-like taste The combination of aromatics associated with the saturated brine used during traditional ewes' milk cheesemaking Aromatics associated with boiled meat or vegetable stock soup
Aged Cheddar cheese (1 yr or older) Ammonia solution (0.25% in water) 4-Methyl-octanoic acid (2% in PG d) 1-Phenyl-2-thiourea (5000 mg/kg in PG) Alum (0.1% in water) Tea, six bags soaked in watere for 3 h Tannic acid (0.05% in water) Mild Cheddar
Methoxy pyrazines (5 #g/kg) Freshly cut bell pepper Horseradish sauce
Caffeine (0.02, 0.06 or 0.08% in water) Tonic water, quinine (0.01% in water) Octan-2-one (1% in PG) Ewes' milk cheese brine at room temperature
Canned potatoes Low-sodium beef broth cubes Methional (20 mg/kg)
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
459
Table 2 continued Term
Definition a
Butter milk Buttery
B
Fatty, buttery tasting, of the nature of, or containing butter The aromatics commonly associated with natural, fresh, slightly salted butter Aroma rising from butter at room temperature
Butyric, butyric acid
Capric acid Caramel
Caseinate Catty Cheddary
Cheese rind Cooked, cooked milk
Cottage cheese Cowy/phenolic
Creamy
Dairy fat Dairy sour Dairy sweet Decaying animal Diacetyl Earthy Fatty Faecal Fermented Fermented fruity / winey
Flavour intensity Free-fatty acid Fresh fish
Sour flavour, similar to baby vomit The aromatics reminiscent of baby vomit; is sour and cheesy m
The taste and aromatics associated with burnt sugar or syrup; toffee made from sugar that has been melted further Aroma associated with tom-cat urine The taste and aromatics associated with typical Cheddar Typical aroma and taste of sharp/mature Cheddar cheese m
Aromatics associated with cooked milk The combination of sweet, brown flavour notes and aromatics associated with heated milk m
Aromas associated with barns and stock trailers, indicative of animal sweat and waste Fatty, creamy tasting, of the nature of, or containing cream The oily aromatics reminiscent of milk or dairy fat The sour aromatics associated with dairysoured products The sweet aromatics associated with fresh dairy products The aromatics reminiscent of decaying animal material Aromatics associated with diacetyl m
Aroma associated with complex protein decomposition The combination of aromatics reminiscent of red wine in general; it is sweet, slightly brown, overripe and somewhat sour The overall intensity of flavour in the sample, from mild to strong Aromatics associated with short chain fatty acids The aromatics associated with fresh fish
S t a n d a r d b, c
Pasteurised butter milk Unsalted butter Lightly salted butter Pasteurised cooking butter Diacetyl (1% in PG) Diacetyl in vaseline oil (several concentrations) Butyric acid, 2500 mg/kg in vaseline oil =SSf. 2 ml SS + cotton in 60-ml flask Butyric acid (10 000 mg/kg in PG) Butyric acid (1% in PG) Capric acid (pure) Condensed milk 3-Hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone (2% in PG)
Sodium caseinate powder 2-Mercapto-2-methyl-pentan-4-one (20 mg/kg) Processed cheese Mature Cheddar cheese
Cheese rind (Tilsit mild, pasteurised full fat) Skim milk heated to 85 ~ for 30 min Evaporated milk UHT milk 3.6% fat, cooked for 10 min Cottage cheese 25% fat p-Cresol (160 mg/kg), bandaids
Mascarpone cheese ,y-Decanolactone (0.1% in PG) UHT Cream 35% fat Whipping cream Unsalted butter Sour cream Vitamin D milk Dimethyl disulfide (bottom notes only; 10 000 mg/kg in PG) Diacetyl (20 mg/kg) Geosmin (0.001% in PG) Palm kernal fat Indole, skatole (20 mg/kg) Fermented milk, 12% fat Burgundy cooking wine
Butyric acid (20 mg/kg) Elodea
(an aquatic plant) growing in water continued
460
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Table 2
continued
Term
Definitiona
Standard b, c
Fruity
The taste and aromatic blend of different fruity identities The aromatics associated with different fruits
Goaty
The aromatics reminiscent of wet animal hair; it tends to be pungent, musty and somewhat sour
Canned fruit salad (in syrup) trans-2-Hexenal (10 000 mg/kg in PG) Canned fruit cocktail juice Fruit of the forest yoghurt Ethyl butyrate (0.1% in PG) trans-2-Hexenal. 300 mg/kg in vaseline oil = SS. 3 ml SS + cotton in 60-ml flask Fresh pineapple Ethyl hexanoate (20 mg/kg) Hexanoic acid (5000 mg/kg in PG)
Green-grass Methyl ketone / blue Milkfat /lactone
Milky Mouldy, mouldy/musty
Mushroom
u
Aroma associated with blue-vein cheeses Aromatics associated with milkfat
The aromatics commonly associated with ewes' raw milk The combination of tastes and aromatics generally associated with moulds; they usually are earthy, dirty, stale, musty and slightly sour Aromas associated with moulds and/or freshly turned soil The taste and aromatics associated with raw mushrooms
Musty
Aroma of a damp room or very old book
Nutty
The aromatics reminiscent of several dry fruits such as pecans, walnuts and hazelnuts The non-specific nut-like taste and aromatics characteristic of several different nuts, e.g., peanuts, hazelnuts and pecans The nut-like aromatic associated with different nuts
Overall intensity
Strength of the stimuli perceived by the nose Strength of global stimuli originated by the volatiles released during mastication and perceived on the olfactory receptors via the retronasal route
Oxidised
Aroma associated with oxidised fat The fruity aromatic associated with pineapple
Pineapple
cis-3-Hexenol(1% in PG) 2-Octanone (40 mg/kg) Fresh coconut meat Heavy cream 5-Dodecalactone (40 mg/kg) Ewes' milk raw Pasteurised milk, 3.6% fat 2-Ethyl-l-hexanol (10 000 mg/kg in PG) 2-Ethyl-l-hexanol (40 mg/kg) Stilton cheese 2,4,6 Trichloroanisole (1% in PG)
Button mushroom (raw) Brown mushrooms (chopped, raw) 1-Octen-3-ol (0.5% or 1% in PG) 3-Octanol (10 000 mg/kg in PG) 3-Octanol. 5-10 mg/kg in vaseline oil = SS. 3 ml SS + cotton in 60 ml flask Cola infusion in ethanol (pure) Damp room Very old book Wheat germ 2 g Walnuts + 2 g hazelnuts, minced in 60-ml flask (mixed particulates to be sampled) Mixed crushed nuts 2-Acetyl-pyridine (0.01% in PG) Lightly toasted unsalted nuts Unsalted wheat thins Roasted peanut oil extract Roasted peanuts, ground hazelnuts, ground almonds, 1:1:1 1000-73 nut base by Givaudan-Roureg (10% in PG) 4 g cheese aroma/100 ml of pasteurised ewes' milk 0.5-3.5 g cheese aroma/100 g Quark 91549-24 by Givaudan Roureg 91483-24 by Givaudan Roure 91428-24 by Givaudan Roure 91125-73 by Givaudan Roure 10418-71 by Givaudan Roure 2,4 Decadienal, 20 mg/kg 4-Pentenoic acid (10 000 mg/kg in PG) Canned pineapple chunks
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
461
Table 2 continued Term
Definition a
Standardb, c
Prickle/bite
Chemical feeling factor of which the sensation of carbonation on the tongue is typical A bland, shallow and artificial taste. Made by melting, blending and frequently emulsifying other cheeses
Soda water
Processed
Propionic acid Pungent
Rancid
Rennet Rosy/floral Salty
Sauerkraut Scorched Sharp
Smokey, smoky
Soapy
Sour
Soya sauce
m
A physically penetrating sensation in the nasal cavity. Sharp smelling or tasting, irritating Irritative, burnt and/or penetrating sensation in the interior of the mouth
The taste and aroma associated with sour milk and oxidised fats. Having the rank unpleasant aroma or taste characteristic of oils and fats when no longer fresh The aromatics associated with natural lamb rennet Aroma associated with flowers Fundamental taste sensation of which sodium chloride is typical Fundamental taste sensation elicited by salts Fundamental taste sensation produced by aqueous solutions of several products such as sodium chloride The aromatics associated with fermented cabbage Aroma associated with extreme heat treatment of milk proteins The total impression associated with the combination of aromatics that are sour, astringent and pungent Total impression of penetration into the nasal cavity The perception associated with aged and ripened cheeses, from flat to sharp The penetrating, dark brown, acrid aromatic of charred wood Aroma and taste of hickory-smoked ham The penetrating smoky taste and aromatics, similar to charred wood Tainted by exposure to smoke Perception of any kind of smoke odour (hickory, apple, cherry, mesquite or artificial flavouring) A detergent-like taste and smell. Similar to when a food is tainted with a cleansing agent Fundamental taste sensation elicited by acids Fundamental taste sensation of which lactic and citric acids are typical The aromatics that are reminiscent of soy sauce; they are sour, slightly brown and pungent
Cheese strings (a processed cheese snack) Propionic acid (1% in PG) A ratio of 1 part sour cream to 0.68 parts horseradish sauce Danish blue cheese Ammonia (1% in PG) 0.5 g cayenne/100 ml water, boiled in water for 5 min, 1.5 ml of filtration/10 g Quark Cheese stored at 21 ~ for 4 days Butyric acid (0.1% in PG)
Natural lamb rennet (33% NaCI) 2-Phenethylamine, 20 mg/kg Sodium chloride (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 or 1% in water) Pecorino Romano sheep cheese, 1200 mg NaCI/100 g Quark
Dimethyl disulfide (top notes only; 10 000 mg/kg in PG) Milk heated to 121 ~ for 25 min Propionic acid (100 000 mg/kg in PG) 5000 mg/kg of propionic acid in Vaseline oil = SS. 2 ml SS + cotton in 60 ml flask
Oil of cade Hickory smoked ham Applewood cheese Guaiacol (0.5% in PG) Guaiacol in vaseline oil (several concentrations) Liquid smoke flavouring. 40 #1 + cotton in 60-ml flask Lauric acid (pure) Mellow processed Cheddar Citric acid (0.08% in water) Lactic acid (0.05 and 0.085% in water) Soya sauce
continued
462
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Table 2 continued Term
Spicy/pungent Strength Sulfur Sweaty
Sweet
Toasty Umami Vinegary Waxy, waxy/crayon
Whey Yeasty
S t a n d a r d b, c
Definition a m
The overall intensity of aroma and flavour, the degree of mildness and maturity Aromatics associated with sulphurous compounds The aromatics-associated reminiscent of perspiration-generated foot odour; sour, stale, slightly cheesy and is found in unwashed gym socks and shoes Fundamental taste sensation of which sucrose is typical Fundamental taste sensation elicited by sugars Fundamental taste sensation produced by aqueous solutions of several products such as sucrose or fructose The combination of sweet aromatics produced after food toasting or cooking Chemical feeling factor elicited by certain peptides and nucleotides Aroma described as acidic, fermented and sweaty by the panelists The sweet aromatic that is associated with waxed paper or wax candles Aromatics associated with medium chain fatty acids Aromatics associated with Cheddar cheese whey Aromatics associated with fermenting yeast
Yoghurt
Valeric acid (1% in PG) English blue Stilton cheese Boiled mashed egg. H2S bubbled through water; struck match Isovaleric acid (10 000 mg/kg in PG) Isovaleric acid (0.1% in PG) Isobutyric acid (5% in PG) Cheese stored at 30 ~ for 3 h Sucrose (1,3, 4 or 5% in water) Condensed milk 1.2 g sucrose/100 g Quark
Cooked condensed milk Ciclotene (several concentrations in water) Monosodium glutamate (1% in water) Combination of acetic, butyric and propionic acids Decanoic acid (pure) Capric acid, lauric acid or decanoic acid (100 mg/ml) Fresh Cheddar whey Whey powder Raw yeast dough Yeast in 3% warm sucrose water Yoghurt, 3.2% fat
a The precise wording of some definitions has been changed to allow the use of consistent language in this table. However, the meaning of each definition is unchanged. b Units of measurement are changed to a standard format where possible. c Publications referenced often provided brand names of food standards used. Brand names are not provided in this table as it is recognised that many of these will only be of interest to readers in their country of origin. In addition, as some publications referenced are now more than 10 years old, products may have changed. d Propylene glycol. e Volume of water not given in publication referenced. f Stock solution. g Codes refer to commercially available flavour mixtures that can be provided by Givaudan Roure, Switzerland.
be possible to develop and standardise a terminology that can be used universally, and for all cheese types, eventually leading to a much-improved understanding about the eating quality of cheese.
The Human Senses and the Sensory Properties of Cheese Cheese appearance
Humans are highly visual creatures and allow vision to dominate other sensory modalities. Vision is the perception of shape and texture, size and distance, brightness,
colour and movement. Appearance characteristics of cheese are assessed visually, usually prior to consuming the cheese, or when preparing the cheese for consumption by cutting or spreading. Appearance characteristics include colour, presence of eyes or holes (or openness), mould, rind, and visual texture (Tables 1 and 3). In addition, appearance includes a cheese's market image (e.g., size, shape, packaging), as most cheese is purchased in this form (Murray and Delahunty, 2000a). Appearance characteristics create sensory expectations, or expectations of how the cheese will 'taste', and as vision can dominate other sensory modalities, visual aspects of cheese can often have a strong influence on
cO if)
E o o O
if) if)
o O > t--
00 o (.o
.~_ "O
o9
'm .,,_,
{3.. >, .,,_, r,.b
o >,,
O c-" r~ > .,,_, o
> c(..,,_, .,,_, o
o >, O t~ c
co O
O3 e~ ,,,,,,,,.
#
(D >:,
E E o
~._ :::3
00
c
>. o -5
~ .~ =o
~
c--
m
~- > ,~.~
if)
-~ox: dN ~
2Z5~ -&
_
--~
>:,~ ~:~
g~2~
.
~ oo (D i
o~,
< J
t~
r-
c'-
9m
a~ w->~ ~ m
O
g,-,-- x ~
:~
>,
(~"
>'=~&
~
>:, c
~ (D
~
~.~ ~ o~
~=
~~
d " d5
~-~
~ --, :.,E
O0 0
~ 9
-~-
.
~"5
(','-'
9 .-
_~ -~
~= ~%~ ~ =
~{%
>
o-m (/) >,,,
o
c~ E
-~'~
._'--
..~
~~ , , , , ~, ~c = ~'
~
0.':
0
0
~ ~
='EE
c-
~
0
"~
,,, =o
~'~
.,._,
"~
0
.,- r,-,-=
~ 0
~--
~_
..= ~
0
>~ m ~-o
o
o
0 @ >qO~" ~= ~ _ ~ ~
~"
~~ ..,,--,
e~~~
O0 c
~,_=-~
~o
o
c-
~
~-
"~
_
E
T
,• .ID
f'~ . _
~o~ =~-~ .~
0
~ E rGo ~ '6E~
~
""
E
9~ .~,-,
I~
q
o b-. 0 c~ O ~
~m~_b-r~
E o
c-
-5
0 o
c
c
tO
2
"5
0
t--
E b~
%
..
E
Ob
Z"l-
rif)
c
C
-~
,~ X
c ffl
v
.-> f"~
~ 9- -
~
~ 4-~
,.
0
,.-.Z
(~
I_
9--
X
~I
"',~
C
~
.c~
="'
0
"O
a
~
N-e
c--
~
c-
~
c
9~ -~ .~_
~:~
#. < #-
r,
c~ C >
"5 -~
"~ E
o
E5
..C
2
c
~o>,
co
4.-,
-
~
03
0..0
"(3
,~
C "~-
~
E
C~
0 0 O
=
-E
~ ~
~
._o o ~, "-_~ E-__" o "tO_
~ =o
C
-,-
~~- d
o
9
C
.. _ C
~G
CD ~
4..
0
~_.
~,o
4-..' 4-0 (/)
030
~
~G
o~ c'-
~.~
e~
_cO
~~ 0
o
~o
9. ~
C
o ,_
~
---
>t,
"o
>:,
'~os
.
E=
~ ' ~ .C
~I
-~
~, C
03
~
~
.
" < # .
o
~ E~
.
t-
OOOo~ ~
"7
0
c OD
".~
~
0
~
...0 0
OZ
c-
>
0
Ob Ob
,,,~. = o
~ ~
"O
0
465
466
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
the perception of other characteristics that, general experience has taught us, are related (even if they may not be physically related). For example, many consumers believe that a coloured cheese is more intensely flavoured than its uncoloured equivalent (Bogue et al., 1999). Cheese texture
Texture can be defined as the attribute of a cheese resulting from a combination of physical properties, including size, shape, number, nature and conformation of the constituent structural elements, that are perceived by a combination of the senses of touch (tactile texture), vision (visual texture) and hearing (auditory texture). For example, the 'softness' of a cream cheese can be assessed visually upon cutting the cheese, by proprioceptive sensations when spreading the cheese, and finally by tactile sensations in the mouth during consumption. During mastication and consumption, texture perception occurs in the superficial structures of the mouth, around the roots of the teeth and in the muscles and tendons. Cheese texture characteristics frequently described include firmness, rubberiness, crumbliness, graininess, cohesiveness and adhesiveness (Tables 1 and 3). Cheese flavour
Flavour is most often defined as the integrated perception of olfactory, taste and chemesthesis (or trigeminal) stimuli. Flavour perception begins prior to consumption when a consumer can smell a cheese, but is finally perceived during consumption when compounds that stimulate the olfactory system in the nose, the taste system in the mouth and the trigeminal system in the mouth and nose are released from the cheese and become available to receptors. A large number of flavour characteristics have been described in cheese. Some that have been defined and standardised for application in descriptive sensory evaluations are listed in Table 2. Smell or aroma is usually the first aspect of flavour encountered by a consumer. The stimuli for smell are air-borne compounds of volatile substances that allow them to travel from their source to the olfactory receptors, where perceptions are created that are endowed with distinctive smells. Volatile stimuli are released from cheese into the air, and may be delivered to the nose orthonasally, often consciously, by sniffing (e.g., when one opens a cheese package or removes a trier from the cheese for evaluation). Volatile compounds may also be released into the buccal cavity air during consumption, where they are delivered to the nose retronasally without any conscious effort. Many hundreds of different volatile
compounds, each with a distinctive aroma character, have been identified in cheese, and these provide the largest contribution to the diversity of cheese flavours. Compounds identified in cheeses include fatty acids, methyl, ethyl and higher esters, methyl ketones, aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, short- and longchain alcohols, aromatic alcohols, aldehydes, amines, amides, phenols and sulphur compounds (Maarse and Visscher, 1996). Much of what we commonly refer to as 'taste' is incorrectly localised smell detection. The significant contribution of aroma to flavour can be easily demonstrated if one pinches the nose shut whilst eating, effectively blocking air circulation through the nasal passages. Then, a familiar cheese, e.g., Cheddar, will not be recognised, and can easily be confused with one that would otherwise be easily distinguished, e.g., Gruyere. Taste is another aspect of flavour. Tasting occurs in the oral cavity, primarily on the tongue, but also on the soft palate. The primary stimuli for taste are nonvolatile compounds, and these must make contact with the taste receptors. This contact creates perceptions that endow four distinctive taste qualities, referred to as sweet, salty, sour and bitter. A fifth taste, 'umami', has been accepted more recently, particularly in Japan and other cultures where it is the most familiar and the most easily perceived. Compounds that contribute directly to cheese taste include lactic acid (sour), sodium chloride (salty), mineral salts of potassium, calcium and magnesium (salty) and free amino acids and peptides of varying types (sweet, bitter, umami) (Warmke et al., 1996; Engel et al., 2000). The last aspect of flavour is chemesthesis. This term is used to describe the sensory system responsible for detecting chemical irritants. Detection is more general than that of taste and smell and occurs primarily in the eyes, nose and mouth. The perception is closely related to the somato-sensory characteristics of pain and temperature change, and provokes a strong behavioural response. The fizz of carbon dioxide (CO2), the cooling sensation of menthol and the burning sensation of chilli are perhaps the best examples of how chemical irritation can provide additional character that is very much desired in a wide range of food products. With regard to cheese, the pungency, the prickle/bite and the sharpness of mature Cheddar are examples of perceived chemical irritation (Table 2). Sensory interactions
Cross-modal sensory interactions also occur, adding complexity to the perception and description of sensory character. Consumers rarely distinguish between stimuli of different sensory modalities (unless trained to do so), and generally describe the integrated sensation as 'taste'.
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
However, the factors that cause apparent cross-modal sensory interactions are not always the same and can be difficult to comprehend. A first cause of apparent sensory interactions when perceptible components of a cheese are studied together can be interactions between the components of the cheese prior to introduction to the senses. For example, changing the fat content or salt content of a cheese can influence the physical chemistry of the cheese matrix dramatically, changing the partition coefficients of volatile compounds, and therefore releasing volatiles from the cheese matrix (Delahunty and Piggott, 1995). As a cheese matures, the protein composition changes significantly due to proteolysis, and this may change the binding ability of the cheese for specific volatile compounds (Delahunty and Piggott, 1995). A second cause of sensory interaction is termed a halo effect, and is caused by learning to place greater reliance on one sensory modality over another to make behavioural decisions. This effect was referred to in the context of appearance, as it is most obvious by the dominance, or bias, of the visual sense over the taste or olfactory sense. It can be demonstrated by confusing familiar colour and flavour combinations, or by varying colour intensity beyond expectation (Clydesdale, 1993). With regard to cheese, an influence of added colour on consumers' perception of flavour has been reported (Bogue et al., 1999). A true cross-modal sensory interaction is one where the function of one sense (e.g., threshold measures, concentration-response functions) is changed by stimulation of another sense. This type of interaction can occur at receptor level, where one component blocks access to the receptor by another (e.g., increasing viscosity may coat the tongue and reduce access of tastants to taste receptors (Lynch et al., 1993)), or where stimulation by both components results in neural convergence as receptor sites are in close proximity and are served by the same nerve (e.g., capsaicin desensitisation reduces perceived taste intensity (Karrer and Bartoshuk, 1995)). The extent of these types of interactions in cheese, and their effect, is not known. Taste-aroma interactions are also observed and appear to be true interactions even though the physiology of the senses of olfaction and taste is independent. In this case, interaction is believed to occur centrally at a cognitive level where stimulus integration takes place (Stevenson et al., 1999). Taste-odour interactions have been observed in many different types of food and are easily demonstrated in model food studies (Noble, 1996). When volatile compounds are introduced to the oral cavity in the absence of taste-active compounds, they are generally perceived to be of low intensity and are described as bland in character. In cheese, it is most likely that the flavour impact of specific volatile compounds will be pronounced (and become familiar) only
467
when perceived in combination with appropriate tasteactive compounds, such as lactic acid, mineral salts, free amino acids and bitter peptides typically present in cheese (Frank and Byram, 1988). In addition, variations in taste quality and intensity, for example an increase in sourness (i.e., acidity), or an increase in bitterness, will affect how aroma is perceived (although volatile composition may be unchanged) and give the impression that overall flavour has changed considerably. Flavour-texture interactions are also observed widely. The precise nature of many of these interactions is not known, although structural components, such as proteins, can bind volatile compounds; rheology and structure can also influence mass transfer of non-volatile and volatile compounds to the surface of a cheese bolus where they will be released and become available for perception; fat can coat the receptor surface of the tongue, effectively blocking taste transduction (Lynch et al., 1993) and finally, interactions may occur at a cognitive level during perception integration in a way similar to taste-odour interactions (Weel etal., 2002). Texture-flavour interactions can also be influenced by individual consumer physiology, such as mastication behaviour and saliva flow rate and volume.
Sensory Methods Used to Evaluate Cheese Many reported studies on cheesemaking, cheese composition and cheese microbiology had the objective of controlling or improving sensory characteristics such as appearance, flavour and texture. However, it is difficult to compare the success of these studies as the final sensory character was often measured inappropriately. In many studies, judgements of overall sensory quality (i.e., a grade of 'good' or 'bad'), rather than objective measurements of the perceived intensity of specific sensory characteristics, were carried out to determine the influence of cheese composition, counts of micro-organisms, or control of a cheesemaking variable on flavour or texture quality. Although standard procedures may be followed, e.g., International Dairy Federation standards (IDE 1997), quality judgements are biased by the individual(s) who makes them. In addition, and of greater importance, traditional quality judgements do not allow the application of statistical analyses that would enable relationships between cheese study variables and specific sensory characteristics to be determined. The unaware reader of the literature can very easily confuse measurements of overall sensory quality with descriptions of sensory difference, as it is often reported, for example, that a specific cheesemaking procedure produced cheeses that 'tasted' similar, when in fact they were judged to be of similar quality (i.e., had no defects). Cheeses judged to be of similar quality by the same judge may differ
468
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
significantly in sensory characteristics (Delahunty and Murray, 1997). The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Committee E-18 on Sensory Evaluation of Materials and Products has defined sensory evaluation as 'a scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyse and interpret reactions to the characteristics of foods and materials as they are perceived by the senses of sight, taste, touch and hearing'. A key distinction between sensory evaluation and other chemical and instrumental analytical techniques, is that different techniques can be used to evoke, measure and interpret sensory characteristics that have very different objectives and outcomes. Sensory evaluation can be carried out to determine whether cheeses exhibit defects or other undesirable characteristics, whether a difference in overall sensory character can be detected between two or more cheeses, whether specific differences in sensory characteristics can be perceived, to quantify the intensity of one or more sensory characteristics, to quantify the onset, maximum intensity and decline of a sensory characteristic, and to determine whether consumers find the cheeses to be acceptable or not, based on their sensory characteristics. The distinctions in sensory evaluation methodology can be broadly classified as quality scoring, discrimination testing, descriptive testing, time-intensity testing and consumer acceptability testing, respectively. There are some excellent texts that outline sensory tests in detail (Piggott, 1988; Stone and Sidel, 1993; Lawless and Heymann, 1998; Meilgaard et al., 1999).
Grading and quality scoring The manufacture of cheese of consistent quality is extremely difficult due to the number of production factors that ultimately contribute to eating quality (see 'Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese', Volume 1). In addition, cheeses are susceptible to a large number of defects that can originate in milk, transfer to the cheese curd during making and storage, result from microbial contamination or develop during maturation if the composition at manufacture is not controlled. However, to maintain consumer confidence and loyalty towards a cheese, it is very important to control its quality. In addition, as consumers are becoming more brand-conscious, they become less-accepting of variations in sensory characteristics that traditionally would not be considered defects, and expect to find a cheese with near-identical appearance, flavour and texture in the package each time. To test instrumentally for all possible flavours and structural properties that contribute to eating quality would be an extremely laborious task, and may not achieve success. For example, many compounds that contribute to flavour are present
in concentrations below the detection limit of even the most sophisticated instruments. Quality scoring, grading or judging against specified defects on standardised scorecards (Bodyfelt et al., 1988) is the traditional and still most widely used type of formal sensory evaluation in the cheese industry. Cheese grading is carried out to classify the potential of a cheese to develop a satisfactory character during maturation, and to maintain quality at the point of sale. Grading standards generally specify a scoring system, where top grade is awarded a maximum score, and points are deducted when defects are found. For example, the IDF provides standard scorecards for cheese, and specifies a scale that ranges from 5, representing the highest possible quality, to 0, representing the lowest possible quality (IDE 1997). Each point deducted from the scale is supported by a list of defects that merit the deduction. The defect list that accompanies each score on the scale aims to provide objectivity to the evaluation. The US cheese grading system and the American Dairy Science Association (ADSA) cheese-judging ballot operate in a similar manner (Bodyfelt et al., 1988). Tables 4 and 5 show the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) standards for grades of Cheddar cheese, effective since 1956, which provide guidelines for the award of four g r a d e s - AA, A, B or C. Table 6 shows the ballot used by the ADSA to judge Cheddar cheese quality. McBride and Muir (1999) recently reviewed grading systems used for Cheddar cheese in Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Canada, the IDF and New Zealand. In addition, chapters in recent textbooks by Kosikowski and Mistry (1997) and Robinson and Wilbey (1998) review in detail methods of cheese grading and defects found in cheese. Kosikowski and Mistry (1997) described the sequence of cheese quality judgement. One or more expert evaluators, who have detailed product knowledge built up over many years and maintain a standard in memory of what the ideal product is in terms of sensory characteristics, carry out this evaluation. These experts have the ability to relate their recognition of specific defects to the cause of that defect and to weight the influence of each defect at different levels of severity and how they detract from overall product quality. The overall exterior of a cheese is first judged to determine if it appears deformed or soiled in any way. The rind or surface is judged next as it may be discoloured, cracked or irregular. Internal appearance is judged following cutting, or directly from a cheese trier, as it may have holes, cracks, spots or other opening defects, and colour may be uneven, mottled or dull. Odour, which may be uncharacteristic in many ways, is judged prior to placing a cheese in the mouth,
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
469
Table 4 Specifications for Grade AA and Grade A Cheddar cheese (United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Dairy Division)
Detailed specifications for US Grade AA Fresh or current
Medium cured
Cured or aged
(a) Flavour : Fine and highly pleasing. May be lacking in flavour development or may possess slight characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour. May possess a very slight feed flavour, but shall be free from any undesirable flavours and odours.
Fine and highly pleasing. Possesses a moderate degree of characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour. May possess a very slight feed flavour but shall be free from any undesirable flavours and odours.
Fine and highly pleasing characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour showing moderate to well-developed degrees of flavour or sharpness. May possess a very slight feed flavour but shall be free from any undesirable flavours and odours.
A plug drawn from the cheese shall be firm, appear smooth, waxy, compact, close, flexible and translucent, but may have a few mechanical openings if not large and connecting. May be slightly or not entirely broken down. May possess not more than one sweet hole per plug but shall be free from other gas holes.
A plug drawn from the cheese shall be firm, appear smooth, waxy, compact, close, and translucent but may have a few mechanical openings if not large and connecting. Should be free from curdiness and possess a cohesive velvet-like texture. May possess not more than one sweet hole per plug but shall be free from other gas holes.
Shall have a uniform, bright attractive appearence; practically free from white lines or seams. May be coloured or uncoloured, but if coloured it should be medium yellow-orange.
Shall have a uniform, bright attractive appearance; practically free from white lines or seams. May show numerous tiny white specks. May be coloured or uncoloured, but if coloured it should be medium yellow-orange.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with a smooth bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly but may possess very slight mould under bandage and paraffin, and the following other characteristics to a slight degree: Soiled surface and surface mould. The cheese shall be even and uniform in shape. Rindless. Same as for current, except very slight mould under wrapper or covering permitted.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with a smooth bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly but may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Soiled surface and mould under bandage and paraffin; and surface mould to a definite degree. The cheese shall be even and uniform in shape. Rindless. Same as for medium.
(b) Body and texture: A plug drawn from the cheese shall be firm, appear smooth, compact, close and should be slightly translucent, but may have a few small mechanical openings. The texture may be definitely curdy or may be partially broken down if more than 3 weeks old. Shall be free from sweet holes, yeast holes and gas holes of any kind. (c) Colour : Shall have a uniform, bright attractive appearance; practically free from white lines or seams. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured it should be a medium yellow-orange.
(d) Finish and appearance: Bandaged and paraffin-dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with a smooth bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly but may possess soiled surface to a very slight degree. The cheese shall be even and uniform in shape. Rindless. The wrapper or covering shall be practically smooth, properly sealed with adequate overlapping at the seams or by any other satisfactory type of closure. The wrapper or covering shall be neat and adequately and securely envelop the cheese. May be slightly wrinkled but shall be of such character as to protect fully the surface of the cheese and not detract from its initial quality. Shall be free from mould under wrapper or covering and shall not be huffed or lopsided.
continued
470
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Table 4
continued
Detailed specifications for US Grade A Fresh or current
Medium cured
Cured or aged
(a) Flavour: Shall possess a pleasing flavour. May be lacking in flavour development or may possess slight characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour. May possess very slight acid, slight feed but shall not possess any undesirable flavours and odours.
Shall possess a pleasing characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour and aroma. May possess a very slight bitter flavour and the following flavours to a slight degree: Feed and acid.
Shall possess a pleasing characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour and aroma with moderate to well-developed degrees of flavour or sharpness. May possess the following flavours to a slight degree: Bitter, feed and acid.
A plug drawn from the cheese shall be reasonably firm, appear reasonably smooth, waxy, fairly close and translucent but may have a few mechanical openings if not large and connecting. May be slightly curdy or not entirely broken down. May possess not more than two sweet holes per plug but shall be free from other gas holes. May possess the following other characteristics to a slight degree: Mealy, short and weak.
A plug drawn from the cheese should be fairly firm, appear smooth, waxy, fairly close and translucent but may have a few mechanical openings. Should be free from curdiness. May possess not more than two sweet holes per plug but shall be free from other gas holes. May possess the following other characteristics to a slight degree: Crumbly, mealy, short, weak and pasty.
Shall have a uniform, bright attractive appearance. May have slight white lines or seams. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, it should be a medium yellow-orange.
Shall have a uniform, bright attractive appearance. May have slight white lines or seams and numerous tiny white it should be a medium specks. May be coloured or uncoloured, but if coloured, it should be a medium yellow-orange.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with the bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly but may possess very slight mould under bandage and paraffin and the following other characteristics to a slight degree: Soiled surface, surface mould, rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges. Rindless. Same as for current, except very slight mould under wrapper or covering permitted.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with the bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly but may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Soiled surface, rough surface, mould under bandage and paraffin, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges; and surface mould to a definite degree. Rindless. Same as for medium.
(b) Body and texture: A plug drawn from the cheese shall be firm, appear smooth, compact, close and should be slightly translucent but may have a few mechanical openings if not large and connecting. May possess not more than two sweet holes per plug but shall be free from other gas holes. May be definitely curdy or partially broken down if more than 3 weeks old. (c) Colour: Shall have a fairly uniform, bright attractive appearance. May have slight white lines or seams or be very slightly wavy. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, it should be a medium yellow-orange. (d) Finish and appearance: Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a sound, firm rind with the bandage and paraffin coating adhering tightly, but may possess the following characteristics to a very slight degree: Soiled surface and surface mould; and to a slight degree: Rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges. Rindless. The wrapper or covering shall be practically smooth, properly sealed with adequate overlapping at the seams or by any other satisfactory type of closure. The wrapper or covering shall be neat and adequately and securely envelop the cheese. May be slightly wrinkled but shall be of such character as to fully protect the surface of the cheese and not detract from its initial quality. Shall be free from mould under the wrapper or covering and shall not be huffed but may be slightly lopsided.
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
471
Table 5 Specifications for Grade B and Grade C Cheddar cheese (United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Dairy Division)
Detailed specifications for US Grade B Fresh or current
Medium cured
(a) Flavour: Should possess a fairly pleasing Should possess a fairly pleasing charactercharacteristic Cheddar cheese flavour, but istic Cheddar cheese flavour and aroma. may possess very slight onion and the May possess very slight onion and the following flavours to a slight degree: Acid, following flavours to a slight degree: Flat, flat, bitter, fruity, utensil, whey-taint, yeasty, yeasty, malty, old milk, weedy, barny and malty, old milk, weedy, barny and lipase; lipase; the following to a definite degree: feed flavour to a definite degree. Feed, acid, bitter, fruity, utensil, and whey-taint.
(b) Body and texture: A plug drawn from the cheese may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Coarse, short, mealy, weak, pasty, crumbly, gassy, slitty and corky; the following to a definite degree: Curdy open, and sweet holes. (c) Colour: May possess the following characteristics to a slight degree:Wavy, acid-cut, mottled, salt spots, dull or faded; and definitely seamy. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, may be slightly unnatural
(d) Finish and appearance: Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a reasonably firm sound rind, but may possess very slight mould under bandage and paraffin. The following characteristics to a slight degree: Soiled surface, surface mould, defective coating, checked rind, huffed, weak rind, and sour rind; and to a definite degree: Rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges.
Rindless. The wrapper or covering shall be fairly smooth and properly sealed with adequate overlapping at the seams or by other satisfactory type of closure. The wrapper or covering shall be fairly neat and adequately and securely envelop the cheese. May be definitely wrinkled but shall be of such character as to protect the surface of the cheese and not detract from its initial quality. Shall be free from mould under wrapper or covering but may be slightly huffed and slightly lopsided.
Cured or aged
Should possess a fairly pleasing characteristic Cheddar cheese flavour and aroma, with moderate to well-developed degrees of flavour or sharpness. May possess very slight onion and the following flavours to a slight degree: Flat, yeasty, malty, old milk, weedy, barny, lipase and sulfide; the following to a definite degree: Feed, acid, bitter, fruity, utensil, and whey-taint.
A plug drawn from the cheese may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Curdy, coarse, gassy, slitty, and corky; the following to a definite degree: Open, short, mealy, weak, pasty, crumbly, and sweet holes.
A plug drawn from the cheese may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Gassy, slitty, the following to a definite degree: Open, sweet holes, short, mealy, weak, pasty and crumbly.
May possess a very slight bleached surface; and the following characteristics to a slight degree: Wavy, acid-cut, mottled, salt spots, dull or faded and definitely seamy. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, may be slightly unnatural.
May possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Wavy, acid-cut, mottled, salt spots, dull or faded; and definitely seamy. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, may be slightly unnatural.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a reasonably firm sound rind, but may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Surface mould, mould under bandage and paraffin, checked rind, huffed, weak rind, and sour rind; the following to a definite degree: Soiled surface, rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided, high edges and defective coating.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. Shall possess a reasonably firm sound rind, but may possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Checked rind, huffed, weak rind, and sour rind; the following to a definite degree: Soiled surface, surface mould, mould under bandage and paraffin, rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided, high edges and defective coating. Rindless. Same as for medium.
Rindless. Same as for current, except slight mould underwrapper or covering permitted.
continued
472
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Table 5 continued Detailed specifications for US Grade C Fresh or current
Medium cured
Cured or aged
(a) Flavour: May possess the following flavours to a slight degree: Sour, metallic, onion; and to a definite degree: Acid, flat, bitter, fruity, utensil, whey-taint, yeasty, malty, old milk, weedy, barny, and lipase; feed flavour to a pronounced degree.
May possess the following flavours to a slight degree: Onion and sulfide; and to a definite degree: Flat, sour, metallic, sour, metallic, yeasty, malty, old milk, weedy, barny and lipase; and to a pronounced degree: Feed, acid, bitter, fruity, utensil, and whey-taint.
May possess slight onion and the following flavours to a definite degree: Flat, yeasty, malty, old milk, weedy, barny, lipase and sulfide; and to a pronounced degree: Feed, acid, bitter, fruity, utensil and whey-taint.
(b) Body and texture: A plug drawn from the cheese may possess the following characteristics to a definite degree: Curdy, coarse, corky, crumbly, mealy, short, weak, pasty, gassy, slitty, pinny; and to a pronounced degree: Open and sweet holes. The cheese shall be sufficiently compact to permit the drawing of a plug.
A plug drawn from the cheese may be slightly curdy and may possess the following other characteristics to a definite degree: Coarse, corky, gassy, slitty and pinny; and to a pronounced to a pronounced degree: Open, sweet holes, short, weak, pasty, crumbly and mealy. The cheese shall be sufficiently compact to permit the drawing of a plug.
A plug drawn from the cheese may possess the following characteristics to a definite degree: Gassy, slitty, pinny; and to a pronounced degree: Open, sweet holes, short, weak, pasty, crumbly and mealy. The cheese shall be sufficiently compact to permit the drawing of a plug.
(c) Colour: May have a slight bleached surface and possess the following other characteristics to a definite degree: Wavy, acid-cut, mottled, salt spots, dull or faded; and seamy to a pronounced degree. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured, may be definitely unnatural. The colour shall not be particularly unattractive.
May possess the following characteristics to a definite degree: Wavy, acid-cut, mottled, salt spots, bleached surface, dull or faded; and seamy to a pronounced degree. May be coloured or uncoloured but if coloured may be definitely unnatural. The colour shall not be particularly unattractive.
Same as for medium.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. May possess very slight rind rot and the following other characteristics to a slight degree: Cracks in rind; soft spots and wet rind; and to a definite degree: Surface mould, mould under bandage and paraffin, huffed; and to a pronounced degree: Checked rind, weak rind, sour rind and huffed; and to a pronounced degree: Soiled surface, rough surface, defective coating, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges. Rindless. Same as for current, except definite mould under the wrapper or covering permitted.
Bandaged and paraffin dipped. May possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Rind rot, cracks in rind; and to a definite degree: Checked rind, weak rind, sour rind, wet rind, soft spots and huffed; and to a pronounced degree: Rough surface, soiled surface, surface mould, mould under bandage and paraffin, defective coating, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges. Rindless. Same as for medium.
(d) Finish and appearance: Bandaged and paraffin dipped. May possess the following characteristics to a slight degree: Cracks in rind, soft spots and wet rind; and mould under bandage and paraffin; and to a definite degree: Soiled surface, surface mould, defective coating, checked rind, weak rind, sour rind, and huffed; and to a pronounced degree: Rough surface, irregular bandaging, lopsided and high edges. Rindless. The wrapper or covering shall be fairly smooth and properly scaled with adequate overlapping at the seams or by other satisfactory type of closure. The wrapper or covering shall adequately and securely envelop the cheese. May be definitely soiled and wrinkled but shall be of such character as to protect the surface of the cheese and not detract from its initial quality. May have slight mould under the wrapper or covering and may be definitely huffed and lopsided.
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
473
Table 6 American Dairy Science Association ballot for judging the quality of Cheddar cheese. A score of 10 is awarded if the judge cannot find fault with the flavour of the cheese. A score of 5 is awarded if a judge cannot find fault with the body and texture of the cheese. When scores of 9 or less, or 5 or less, for flavour or body and texture, respectively, are awarded, the cause for deduction of marks should be indicated
iPR [ ~ , ] L~."1E'~' I A N T ,L~.,rl.ll
9 2 ~ENCII"~ONl.~ ,,.USE'NO, .-,c,.~-.,,,,L~., ~ ~
'
IMPROPER MARKS
@@@@@@ ,| | 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 @@|174174 0 @@@@@| |174174174174174 | |174 |174174174174 | |174174174174174 |174174174174174 | |174174174174174
~." """,."-"" 'BI~
.
PROPER MARK
CHEDDAR CHEESE
9 ERASE
CHANGES
CLEANLY
AND
COMPLETELY 9 DO N O T M A K E A N Y
CRITICISMS
j
STRAY
MARKS
SAMPLE
2
1
NUMBER
4
3
h
1.
6
8
@( D | 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1|7147147147 14 71 47 1 CD|174174174174174 7 174 4CD|174 14 74 FLAVOR (~ | 1 (~) 7 4(&)1(~) 7 4(~1|7147 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1@ 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4@1|7147147147 4 1|7 4 7 4| 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4........................... I 0 0 "/ 0 ..... Ol 0 l i .....................9 .. 2, FEED 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0. . . . .0. ... 3. FERMENTEID 0 0'.... O: 0 0 .. 0 0 0 CRITICISM 4, FLA'[/LOW FLAVOR 0 ] 1o 0 O~ 0 0 0 0 0 5. FRUITY 0 0 0 Oi .. 0 0 0 ....... 6, HEATED 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI 7. ttlGH ACID 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 NORMAL 8. OXtDIZEO O 0 0 0 0 0 Ol RANGE 9..ANCID O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol 1-10 IO. SULFIDE O 0 0 0 0 o 11. UNCLEAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. WHEY TAINT 0 0 0 0 ........... 0 0 9 0 13. YEASTY 0 O 0 0 0 0 9 Q 0 o! 0 0 0 o! Ot ... O 0 0 0 Ol 0 ..0 . . . . . . . 0 O 0 0 0 0 O~ 0 Ol O 0 0; 0 0 0 01. O~ 0 O 01 .0 0 9 Ot 0 Q 0 0 O4 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Oi 0 Ol.... 9 . . . . 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 ........
I.~
8t
BODY AND
I
I
l
2
4
3
5
6
| CD|174174174 TEXTURE (D | | |174174174174 | | 1 7 4| | | |174174174 ................................. CD|174 9, co.~,, Ol 0 ........................ 0 0 ..................... I NO ...~ ~.:.~,. ... ~,., Ol 0 O[ 0 ;RITI5CISIV 3. cu.oY 0 0 Ol ............. 4, GAssY.. 0 0 0 0 Ol 5. MEALY 0 0 0 0 Ol 6, OPEN 0 0 0 0 Ol NORMAL 7. PASTY 0 0 0 0 Ol .. RANGE 8 sHo.T................@ 0 0 0 Ol 1.--5 9, WEAK 0 0 0 0 Ot ..... 0 0 0 0 0 APPEARANCE i 1 2 AND COLOR .Q Q (~) Q Q I Q Q Q Q - Q
9
.o li
CRIT~CISMt. '
_.
Ol 0 0 0 O 0
Ol 0 0 0 0 0. I
0 0 o
0
NORMAL RANGE
1-5
4 5 3 ~) Q Q Q @(D@@| | |174 ....................................................
.
.
I
o~
..
0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o
.
.
.
i 0 0 0 O .0 0 0
o
.
.
.
7
8
(D@@| 0 0
0 ......................................@ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '7
0 0 0 0 0 0 O 8
CD|174 @CD@@@| (D@@@| i 0 0 0 O 0 0 Ot Oi 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi Oi 0 0 0 0 0 0 . J | 0 "0 ..... 0 0 Oi 0 0 0 0 o . oi ,,o o
oI
Trans..Optic| by NCS EM.41764-3:654321
ED04
Printed in U.S.A.
474
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
and usually immediately upon opening a packed cheese, cutting a coated cheese or removing a trier plug from a cheese. Flavour judgement is made next, when a sample of cheese is placed in the mouth, chewed and moved around and then expectorated. As for odour, numerous uncharacteristic flavours may be detected in defective cheese, and in addition a cheese that is over-salty or very bitter may be considered defective. Finally, but sometimes simultaneously, body and texture are judged. Defects such as over-hardness, crumbliness, mealy and sticky are judged, most often by working a cheese between the thumb and the fingers. Table 7 presents a list of cheese sensory quality characteristics, which are mostly defects recognised internationally and are described in the IDF standard (IDE 1997). It should be noted that a characteristic considered to be a defect in one cheese type may be very much desired in another (e.g., the acceptable hardness of Parmigiano-Reggiano would be considered a defect in Cheddar), and therefore judges must take this into account, and evaluate based on their experience of each cheese type individually. In addition, it may be that a characteristic found in the same cheese type produced in two different countries may be considered defective in one country, but acceptable in another. This will be related to the experience of the cheese consumer in each country, which can be very different. However, cheeses produced in automated facilities today are much less likely to suffer from significant defects due to improved hygiene practices at
all stages of milk handling and cheesemaking, beginning on the farm. In addition, control over cheesemaking has improved significantly in recent years. Cheese grading or quality scoring provides a rapid and simple way quickly to assess overall sensory quality, but does not adequately take into account so-called 'non-quality' related differences in sensory characteristics that give the cheese of individual producers, or regions of production, a distinctive taste. Traditional 'quality criteria' are changing as product ranges expand (e.g., to include low-fat cheeses); variety of cheeses is much greater, and differentiation is increasingly made by purposely developing distinctive sensory characteristics, such as those now given to cheeses by the use of adjunct cultures. Sensory characteristics that are not traditionally considered defects, but which can also differ from one cheese to another, are now also important in determining eating quality for the discerning consumer. What is a negative attribute to one consumer may be a desirable attribute to another consumer. Also, although the characteristics that expert judges seek are those that their market demands, their assessments do not always coincide with those of consumers. It is now well documented that the consumer and the expert opinions of quality often differ. For example, McBride and Hall (1979) found that consumers' preferences among twelve cheeses, ranging from poor to good quality, were not correlated with their official grade scores. Finally, the current cheese-grading practice does not measure accurately the intensity of a given defect, and
Table 7 Terms used by cheese graders to describe sensory characteristics of cheeses that determine quality with particular emphasis on defects (IDF, 1997; Robinson and Wilbey, 1998) Exterior appearance Rind/surface
Appearance interior: Openings
Appearance interior: Colour
Consistency, body and texture
Flavour, odour and taste
Concave, convex, deformed (bulged), dirty, oblique, soiled, too flat, too high, vaulted (blown) Corroded, cracked, discoloured, dry, fatty, holes, incorrect mould, irregular mould, mould under covering, rotten, rough, smear under covering, smeary, speckled, spots of mould, thick, thin, too little mould, too little smear, too much smear, wet, wrinkled Blown, close, collapsed, cracks, distorted, foreign material, foreign mould, glossy openings, hoop side mould, many holes near the surface, nesty openings, no holes, not typical, pin-holed, spots of putrification, too few, too large, too many, too small, uneven, unevenly mouldy Bleached near the surface, bright, brownish, dirty, discoloured, grey, marbled, mottled, natural, pale/dull, red colour near the surface, speckled, streaky, strong, two-coloured, unevenly coloured, weak, yellow Brittle, chalky, close, coarse, crumbly, curdy, dripping, dry, elastic, firm, flaky, friable, gassy, granular (grainy), greasy, gritty, gummy, hard, harsh, hoop side sift, layered, leathery, long, lumpy, mealy, pasty, runny, rough, short, smeary, smooth, soft, soggy, spongy, springy, squeaky, sticky, stringy, thin (watery), tight, tough, uneven, wet Acid, alcoholic, ammoniacal, aromatic, bitter, bland, burnt, buttery, butyric acid, chemical, clove, cooked, cowy, creamy, ethereal, feedy, fermented, fishy, flat, flowery, foreign flavour, foul, foetid, fruity, garlic, goaty, harsh, malty, metallic, mild, mouldy, musty, musty-flat, nutty, off, oily, oniony, over-ripe, pale, peardrop, putrid, rancid, resinous, rich, ripe, sandy, salty, sharp, soapy, sour, spicy, stale, strong, superfine, sulphide, sweaty, sweet, tangy, tallowy, uncharacteristic, unclean, weedy, yeasty
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
therefore further statistical analyses that determine the extent to which cheeses differ, and that mathematically relate composition to defect intensity, are not appropriate. It is important to note that there are still industry situations where grading or quality scoring may be appropriate due to a large number of products that must be assessed in a short period of time. However, these sensory tools were not designed to be quantitative or representative of the entire cheese sensory profile and are not ideal tools for research or marketing. Discrimination tests
Sensory discrimination tests differ from quality scoring tests in that they involve direct comparisons of cheeses to determine whether there is either an overall difference between them or whether they differ for a specific and designated characteristic. The most commonly used discrimination tests include the Paired Comparison (ISO, 1983a), Duo-Trio (ISO, 1991), Triangle (ISO, 1983b) and Ranking tests (I50, 1988). In the Paired Comparison test, two cheeses are presented for comparison with one another and assessors are asked whether they differ; generally, a difference for one specific sensory characteristic is tested. In the Duo-Trio test, assessors are asked which of the two products is the most similar to a third reference product, allowing a common reference to be used again and again. This test has obvious advantages for quality control, although it is not possible to maintain a consistent cheese reference over time. In the Triangle test, assessors are presented with three cheeses and asked to choose which is the most different from the other two. In the Ranking test, four to six cheeses are generally presented for comparison of a single-designated attribute, and the assessor is asked to rank them in order of increasing intensity of that attribute. In best practice, the assessors are forced to make a choice each time for all discrimination tests, thus eliminating response bias. Whether a difference exists or not is determined statistically, based on the number of choices a panel of assessors makes for each cheese in the test, using binomial tables or Chi-squared tests. Therefore, discrimination tests are the most objective and the most sensitive of sensory tests. An additional advantage of these tests is that they do not require well-trained assessors. The only requirement is that all assessors are reasonably sensitive and recognise and understand the designated attribute in a common way. W h e n compared with the traditional quality scoring methods, these discrimination procedures are by far better suited to application to research problems, they follow good sensory evaluation principles and do not encounter problems in scaling and statistical analyses.
475
For this reason, their principles should now be added to quality scoring methods in an attempt to introduce comparability between the scores of one judge and another. It is also common practice to carry out discrimination tests on cheeses to determine whether a difference exists prior to further testing by more costly methods that aim to describe and quantify differences. Descriptive analyses
A majority of scientists who study cheese are interested in understanding the fundamental reasons why a cheese 'tastes' as it does, not just whether the cheese is acceptable, and for this purpose quality control sensory methods are of little value. Descriptive sensory analysis refers to a collection of techniques that seek not only to discriminate between the sensory characteristics of a range of cheeses, but also to determine a quantitative description of all the sensory differences that can be identified. For example, Figs la and lb illustrate quantitative differences in perceived flavour, measured using descriptive analysis, between two hard Swiss cheeses and two Blue cheeses, respectively. All cheeses may be profiled in this way, providing objective and reproducible sensory descriptions of cheeses and providing a basis for determining what characteristics are influenced by changes in cheesemaking practice or composition, and also what characteristics are important for consumer acceptance. The most commonly used descriptive analysis methods for all food types include the Flavour Profile Method (Cairncross and Sj6strom, 1950), Texture Profile Method (Brandt et al., 1963), Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) T M (Stone et al., 1974), the Spectrum T M method (Meilgaard et al., 1999), Quantitative Flavour Profiling (Stampanoni, 1993a,b), and Free-Choice Profiling (Langron, 1983; Thompson and MacFie, 1983). A review of descriptive sensory analysis, which details advantages, disadvantages and applications of each of the methods referred to above was published recently by Murray et al. (2001). Each descriptive method has three stages to its implementation. The first involves selecting a panel to conduct the sensory evaluations, the second, establishing terminology or a vocabulary, by which to describe a products' sensory characteristics and the third, quantifying these sensory aspects. However, for each method, the process is somewhat different. In the cheese industry, as there is a strong tradition of judging that is linked to extensive knowledge of cheese, then it is a wise approach that seeks to build on this knowledge rather than to reinvent the wheel. If the investment in descriptive sensory testing is for the long term, then the Spectrum T M method, or a similar one, is preferable.
476
v
v
o
=~
"5
if_
0 7o
o
/
/
o o
o
o
.,
'
Z"
~
\
.~
o
~
=
9$
i! =>, 0
--
if
._
9$ E
=
i,_
o ,_1
_= 1::13
C
"0 C
s
O.
i_ -~
s ,..C
C
o
i-
Cl.
C
C
>.,
0
E
~
0
o
r'0
.,-,
9
~ c-
._m ~
0
E 0o 0
,.-
s- 0
-
o
~m
o
~
ffl
&~.
~>,
"0
2_>, s ~C
>,,'~
~..o
v
~..,_,
C
(,f) ,4-, " 0
-.i
0
.c:
_=
O3
....,
."~-
\
m
o 0
0._
E O3
E
I.. o
~ (/)
o
9 03
~
rn
E
I..(3
0~___
0
~
L-
g-~
c c
0..
o
"o c
m c
c
,
C
1.-
g~
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Using this method, a group of cheese experts develop and define a descriptive language using a series of universal intensity scales upon which assessors score their perceptions (Drake et al., 2001; Drake and Civille, 2003). The sensory panels that will use the method, often at more than one research site, are then extensively trained. When trained, individual assessors must be able to discriminate between cheeses using each attribute in the descriptive language, repeat their assessments and agree with other panel members on the size and the direction of differences in cheese attributes. The advantages of this descriptive analysis technique are that one panel can be trained readily on several cheese types since one intensity scale is used, different types of cheese can be compared directly and panel scaling is less prone to drift with time (Drake and Civille, 2003). In addition, this approach is objective and allows comparison of results between panels, between laboratories, and from one time to another. For example, if one wishes to study the maturation of a cheese over time, then one must ensure that the differences observed in the results between 3, 6 and 9 months are related specifically to changes that occur in the cheese and not to changes in the performance of the sensory panel. If a cheese type is to be evaluated not very often, or the sensory panel available will not specialise in cheese only, or resources are limited, then the QDA T M approach may be preferable. Using this method, the panel of assessors develop and define the language themselves whilst tasting a wide range of the test cheeses (Murray and Delahunty, 2000b). Assessors must agree with other panel members on the meaning of terms in the descriptive vocabulary and repeat their assessments, but are not required to agree on how to use the attribute scales to rate intensity. When this method is used instead of the Spectrum T M method, it is more difficult to compare the results from one study with those from another in absolute terms. Free-Choice Profiling (FCP) is another useful descriptive analysis method (Williams and Langron, 1984). This method allows the use of untrained assessors, or consumers, to profile the sensory characteristics of cheese. Each assessor may use an individual descriptive vocabulary that they have developed themselves, and which they then readily understand, and data are analysed using Generalised Procrustes Analysis (GPA; Arnold and Williams, 1986). Free Choice Profiling has been used to describe Cheddar cheese (Jack et al., 1993; O'Riordan et al., 1998), Parmigiano-Reggiano (Parolari et al., 1994) and ewes' milk cheeses (Barcenas et al., 2003). The advantages of FCP are that accurate discrimination between cheeses in terms of perceived sensory characteristics can be achieved in a very short
477
time and at a relatively little cost, and that discrimination is based on a large selection of informative words that consumers use and with which they are familiar with. The main disadvantage is that it is difficult to correlate perceived intensity of sensory characteristics obtained in this way, as they are too numerous and imprecise, and there is no consensus vocabulary. To obtain improved accuracy, sensory panels used for descriptive analyses generally comprise of 10-12 assessors instead of a smaller number of experts (with the exception of FCP where 15-20 assessors are needed). These assessors are screened for sensory acuity and relative interest (Stone and Sidel, 1993). A panel or group of individuals is used as factors such as age, saliva flow and onset of fatigue vary between assessors. Assessors also vary in sensitivity to particular stimuli, and it is highly probable that they also vary in their concentration-response functions (Lawless et al., 1994; Williams, 1994). In addition, temporary illness or psychological bias can cause day-to-day changes in sensory ratings. The key point of objective descriptive analysis is that it should be reproducible and independent of consumer preferences. Unlike traditional quality methods that use scorecards, there is no judgment of 'good' or 'bad' as this is not the purpose of the evaluation. The trained sensory panel operates as an instrument and generates quantitative data analogous to instrumental data. As with any instrument, replication is required. Two guidelines have been published dealing with cheese texture (Lavanchy et al., 1994) and the aroma and flavour of cheese (B~rodier et al., 1997a). These guidelines are very valuable as they define descriptive vocabularies, and then detail a procedure for evaluation of each characteristic, including the use of universal scales that are standardised at a number of points with common food references. In addition, they provide translations of many descriptive characteristics of cheese in Spanish, French, Italian, English and German. However, it is important to note that sensory lexicons or languages are not finite and will continue to evolve with time, usage and application. Time-intensity sensory analyses The sensory methods discussed above do not account for the dynamics of flavour release from cheeses that occurs during their consumption. Nor do they account adequately for changes to cheese texture, which occur progressively during mastication and breakdown of a cheese in the mouth. When using conventional sensory procedures, particularly descriptive analyses, assessors 'time-average' their responses to arrive at a single intensity value. This looses much useful information such as
478
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
rate of onset of stimulation, time and duration of maximum intensity, rate of decay of perceived intensity, time of extinction and total duration of the entire process (Lee and Pangborn, 1986). To determine most details about sensory characteristics, changes in sensory character that occur during cheese consumption (which can take up to 30 s for a 'bite-sized' piece) can be measured using time-intensity methodology (Lee and Pangborn, 1986), or in the case of texture, using progressive profiling (Jack et al., 1994). Time-intensity methods are useful for the study of new cheese types, such as low-fat cheeses, as the reduction in fat content not only influences sensory character development, but also the breakdown of the cheese in the mouth during consumption and the rate of release of compounds that contribute to flavour. For example, in a study of Cheddar cheese flavour, the time taken to reach maximum intensity for 'sharpness', 'bitterness' and 'astringency' was consistently longer in reduced-fat than in full-fat Cheddar and, more importantly, the rate of flavour release was greater (Shamil et al., 1991/92). Temporal differences in perception indicate an altered flavour balance, caused by reducing the fat content of the cheese, which may be important in consumer acceptability. Delahunty et al. (1996a) showed that a 'fruity' note, which might be considered an off-flavour (Aston et al., 1985; Urbach, 1993), became a dominant flavour characteristic sooner during consumption and at a much greater intensity in a low-fat Cheddar-type cheese than in the full-fat equivalent. Delahunty et al. (1996b) also demonstrated that improved relationships between volatile composition and perceived sensory characteristics could be achieved by relating time-intensity sensory data with dynamic volatile compound release data. Jack et al. (1994) found that the texture of Cheddar cheese was perceived to be relatively coarse and crumbly earlier in the chewing sequence, but became increasingly smooth and creamy as chewing progressed. In addition, other more subtle or specific cheese-dependent changes occurred as breakdown in the mouth progressed. It was hypothesised that knowledge of these dynamic changes in texture character is important for understanding consumer acceptability. Consumer acceptability testing
Trained sensory panels should not be asked to express a preference as their expert knowledge will introduce bias. To determine the eating quality of cheese, a naive consumer panel or subjective assessors are used. Ideally, these assessors will be regular consumers of the product type under test or represent the target market for the product. Such consumers bring their subjective experience to this test, for although their preferences
will be based on the sensory characteristics tested, they will be referring to past eating experience. In addition, when one considers that the target market may be children, elderly consumers, consumers in another country or consumers from a culture virtually unknown to the producer, then it becomes clear that the internal expertise in a company or organisation cannot hope to predict acceptability adequately. Consumer acceptability testing makes use of rating scales that measure relative dislikes and likes (e.g., the ninepoint hedonic scale (Peryam and Girardot, 1952)), discrimination tests based on preference (e.g., paired preference, ranked preference) or just right scales that ask a consumer how they feel about the designated sensory characteristic. It is recommended that a minimum of 50-60 targeted consumers be used for consume> sensory testing, and a greater number than this if one expects segmentation of preferences (MacFie and Hedderly, 1993). One of the biggest challenges in consumer research is the clarification of consumer language. Consumers may use terms that are ambiguous, have multiple meanings, are associated with 'good' or 'bad' or are combinations of several terms. Integrated terms, such as 'creamy', are often used by consumers to represent a combination of positive attributes. Determining exactly what attribute or attributes 'creamy' refers to (flavour or texture or mouthfeel) have been the subject of many studies relating consumer and trained sensory panels (Mela, 1988; Elmore et al., 1999; Bom Frost et al., 2001). Dacremont and Vickers (1994a,b), who used concept matching to clarify consumer perception of Cheddar cheese flavour, found that the concept of Cheddar cheese flavour is a consumer concept and probably varies widely among consumers, as does Cheddar cheese flavour itself. However, the number of consumers questioned was small and further studies with larger consumer groups, and with demographic information, including types (brand, age) of Cheddar cheese normally consumed, would provide additional clarification.
Influence of Cheesemaking Variables on Sensory Character During the past ten years or so, there have been numerous reports of the application of descriptive sensory analysis to determine accurately the influence of cheesemaking variables, e.g., maturation time and temperature, starter culture or use of adjunct cultures, on the sensory characteristics of cheese (Table 3). Studies of Cheddar cheese maturation have found that, overall, the intensity of odour, flavour and aftertaste is determined by the length (Piggott and Mowat,
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
1991; Muir and Hunter, 1992a) and the temperature of maturation (Hannon et al., 2003). However, flavours such as milky/buttery and creamy decrease in intensity, while flavours such as sour, bitter, rancid and pungent increase in intensity (Piggott and Mowat, 1991; Muir and Hunter, 1992a; Hannon et al., 2003). Some textural changes, e.g., firmness, are controlled by the cheesemaking procedure and cheese composition, whereas mouth-coating character is related to maturation time (Piggott and Mowat, 1991; Muir and Hunter, 1992a). Hort and Le Grys (2001), who also studied Cheddar, found that springiness decreased, and crumbliness and creaminess increased as maturation progressed. Banks et al. (1993) and Fenelon et al. (2000) used descriptive analysis to determine the sensory properties of low-fat Cheddar cheese, and to compare these with the sensory properties of full-fat Cheddars. Fenelon et al. (2000) found that there were some differences in flavour characteristics related to fat content that were present regardless of the age of cheese. Fullfat cheeses were consistently more buttery, creamy and caramel-like. Adhikari et al. (2003) found that low-fat and full-fat Swiss cheeses, and low-fat Cheddar cheeses were dry and crumbly. Factory and farmhouse Cheddars have also been compared using descriptive sensory analysis (Muir etal., 1997a; Murray and Delahunty, 2000c); farmhouse cheeses were found to have a greater diversity in sensory characteristics. In addition, cheeses produced from pasteurised milk were found to be clearly different from those produced from unpasteurised milk, with the unpasteurised milk cheeses being more diverse in sensory character and more intensely flavoured (Grappin and Beuvier, 1997; Muir et al., 1997a; Murray and Delahunty, 2000c). Numerous studies have used descriptive sensory analysis to address the role of specific adjunct cultures or starter culture enzyme systems in Cheddar cheese flavour (Drake et al., 1996, 1997; Muir et al., 1996; Delahunty and Murray, 1997; Lynch et al., 1999; Banks et al., 2001; Broadbent et al., 2002). Muir et al. ( 1 9 9 6 ) demonstrated that starter culture type and adjunct determined the sensory character of cheese. However, they also found direct and interactive effects of composition. More recently, O'Riordan and Delahunty (2003a,b) found that starter culture type led to consistent differences in sensory characteristics between Cheddar cheeses, but that composition led to significant variation within batches of cheese made using the same starter culture. Delahunty and Murray (1997) also demonstrated differences between Cheddar cheeses based on starter culture type, although these cheeses were awarded the same grade score (Fig. 2). Descriptive sensory analysis has been used to determine the impact of yeast extract and milk standardisation
cheddaw
6
479
0.5
balanced strength
$2 mushro38m $2 39
$3 astringent 39 $2 -0.5
~
O4
on
-6
$2
s339 $1
pungent
0.5
39
81
;339
S3acidic
82
39
9S2 39
C3 81
39
sweet $1
39
I $2 38 6
38
39
$1
processed
S137 39
bitter salty $1 37
creamy
rancid mouldy
$1 37
buttery
-6
-0.5
PC1 (43%)
Figure 2 Two-dimensional representation of the result of Principal Components Analysis of descriptive analysis sensory data for Cheddar cheese produced using three different starter cultures (coded $1-$3). Grade scores for flavour, awarded by an expert cheese grader, are also illustrated close to each cheese code (range 37-39).
with milk protein concentrate on reduced-fat Cheddar cheese flavour (Shakeel-ur-Rehman et al., 2003a,b,c) and of smoking parameters on cheese flavour (Shakeelur-Rehman et al., 2003d). There have been many studies of cheese types other than Cheddar, and to discuss them all would be impossible within the scope of this chapter. Of most interest are studies of Comte cheese using a flavour-descriptive vocabulary developed by B~rodier et al. (1997b; published in French). This lexicon has been used to identify naturally existing cheese geo-regions within France (Monnet et al., 2000). In addition, Virgili et al. (1994) used descriptive analysis to study the sensory-chemical relationships in Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese. Descriptive analysis of cheese texture has been conducted recently on a variety of cheeses, on cheeses of different fat contents and on fat replacers (Drake and Swanson, 1996; Drake et al., 1999a; Lobato-Calleros et al., 2001; Madsen and Ardo, 2001; Gwartney et al., 2002). In these studies, descriptive sensory analysis was used to differentiate cheeses and/or the impact of various treatments. A sensory texture language, like a cheese flavour language, is also not necessarily finite. The language will continue to be refined, particularly as additional cheeses are studied or as additional instrumental studies are conducted. The texture languages used by Drake et al.
480 Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation (1999a) and Gwartney et al. (2002) were merged into one complete language by Brown et al. (2003).
Towards a Universal Cheese-Sensory Language As mentioned previously, some of the key advantages of using descriptive sensory vocabularies with definitions and references are the ability to communicate accurately results between multiple research groups or to reproduce research results at different sites. Hirst et al. (1994) compared the evaluation of cheese between trained British and Norwegian panels using independently developed sensory languages. Cross-cultural differences were attributed to the observed discrepancies in term usage and sample differentiation. More recently, ring trials at seven sites across the European Union were conducted and a core sensory language for evaluation was developed (Hunter and McEwan, 1998; Nielsen and Zannoni, 1998). While similar patterns of differentiation among samples by panels that use different languages are expected (particularly if the vocabularies are comprehensive and the panellists highly trained), standardised language with definitions and references improves communication, cross panel validation and subsequent application of descriptive analysis results to instrumental or consumer data. Further, other sources of variation potentially exist in comparing panel results at different sites within the same country using the same language. Drake et al. (2002) reported on the performance of three descriptive panels trained at different sites by different panel leaders on a previously developed and standardised cheese descriptive language (Drake et al., 2001). Panels were able to communicate accurately attribute differences between cheeses. However, differences were observed between these panels in scale usage and attribute recognition. These differences were attributed to the differences in panel leadership and the duration of panellist training. In a similar study, Martin et al. (2000) compared odour profile results of two panels. Language, scale and method of presentation were standardised. Results obtained from the two panels were similar. However, differences between attribute intensities were reported and were attributed to differences in the experience and/or perception of individual panellists. As with the conclusions of Drake etal. (2002), strong panel-leader interaction was recommended as a means of rectifying these differences, along with regular feedbacks between the two panels. As referred to previously, Tables 1, 2 and 3 present terms used for descriptive sensory analysis by different research groups for a wide variety of cheeses. In many cases similar terms have been used to describe dominant
characteristics of different cheese types, suggesting that it could be possible to develop and standardise a terminology that can be used universally and for all cheese types. The will to achieve this objective is much needed.
Relating S e n s o r y Characteristics to C o n s u m e r Preferences Preference mapping is a generic term given to a collection of techniques, which have emerged in recent years to quantify, analyse and interpret consumer preferences for products. A premise can be made that the preferences of a group of consumers of sufficient size (60 or more) will discriminate between comparable products based on intrinsic sensory differences, and that the degree and direction of discrimination will reflect the number and the intensity of sensory differences that can be perceived. Therefore, by simply quantifying and analysing preference, or acceptance for the range, a preference map reflecting sensory differences can be drawn. The preferences of individual consumers can be represented as a map loading, and areas of minimum and maximum preference can be identified. In addition, segmentation techniques, when used in tandem, can illustrate opportunities for a selection of optimised products within the same range (or sensory space). Analysis of consumer preference data in this way is referred to as internal preference mapping (McEwan, 1995; Schlich, 1995). When consumer preference evaluation of a set of cheeses is followed by the application of descriptive analysis to the same set of cheeses, this allows multivariate statistical analysis, e.g., using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR; Martens and Martens, 1986), and relation of descriptive properties that describe exactly what attributes are perceived and at what levels with the extent and direction of consumer preferences. This additional analysis facilitates interpretation of the internal preference map, and is referred to as external preference mapping (McEwan, 1995; Schlich, 1995). These techniques provide a powerful research tool for market analysis and new product development. One can extend the preference map by seeking technical extensions, or relationships between preferences, sensory characteristics and physical and chemical properties of products. One can also extend the preference map by seeking behavioural extensions, or by determining characteristics of the consumers and how they have developed their preferences and make their choice decisions. Preference mapping has been conducted with many products, including cheese (McEwan etal., 1989; Lawlor and Delahunty, 2000; Murray and Delahunty, 2000a,c; B~ircenas et al., 2001). Recently, Young et al.
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation 481 (2003) conducted preference mapping of Cheddar cheeses using consumers at two different locations (Oregon and North Carolina, USA). Seven Cheddar cheeses with distinct descriptive sensory properties were selected. Six distinct consumer clusters were identified, indicating a wide variability in consumer preferences even among one cheese type. Analysis of the consumer concept of 'aged cheese flavour' and 'young cheese flavour' indicated that consumers could differentiate between young and aged Cheddar cheeses and that these concepts were consistent with descriptive panel language. However, the consumer concept of 'Cheddar flavour' varied widely and was not pinpointed to specific descriptive cheese flavour terms. Lawlor and Delahunty (2000) conducted preference mapping with a diverse range of cheese types, and also found wide variability in consumer preferences. Although a Blue Shropshire cheese, described as coloured, mouldy and crumbly, was the least liked overall (162 consumers), it was preferred by two of seven segments of the consumer sample, representing 50% of the total questioned. On the other hand, a Gruyere cheese, described as fruity, sweet and firm, was preferred overall, but was the first choice of only one segment with 10 consumers.
Relating Sensory Perception to Chemical Components and Instrumental Measurements Relating defined sensory flavour and/or texture to specific instrumental tests or chemical compounds is an important and expanding area of research. Cheese flavour chemistry and texture analyses are addressed in detail in 'Cheese Flavour: Instrumental Techniques' and 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese' of Volume 1, but sensory characteristics of cheeses cannot be addressed without brief attention to this subject. Relating sensory perception to instrumental measurements is important because in certain cases an instrumental test would be more cost-effective and/or convenient than sensory testing. However, more importantly, establishment of key relationships between sensory perception and flavour chemistry or rheology provides the potential to link cheese flavour or texture to the technology of cheese production; this is a key issue in providing a consistent and high-quality product to the discerning consumer. Relating sensory language and chemical volatile compounds represents a challenge for several reasons. The relative concentration of a compound in a cheese is not necessarily a measure of its sensory impact due to different sensory thresholds and the effects of the food matrix on retention and release. The sensitivity and selectivity of the extraction technique must also be taken into account (Delahunty and Piggott, 1995).
Finally, only a small percentage of the volatile components in a food are odour-active (Friedrich and Acree, 1998; see also 'Cheese Flavour: Instrumental Techniques', Volume 1). Establishing these relationships is time-consuming and tedious. To use flavour as an example, extensive and relevant instrumental volatile analysis must be conducted, followed by gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) and quantitative analysis to pinpoint volatiles of interest. On the sensory side, descriptive analysis with a defined and anchored language is required. Sensory threshold testing to confirm that key volatile compounds are above detection thresholds must be conducted, followed by descriptive sensory analysis of compounds in model systems across the concentration range found in the cheese to confirm the sensory response (Drake and Civille, 2003). It should also be noted that the perception of the cheese flavour is an integrated response to numerous mixed stimuli, including volatile compounds, nonvolatile compounds and structural properties. The perception of this stimulation is multi-modal, but simultaneous, and therefore very complex. Panelists tasted water-soluble extracts of Comte cheese to identify fractions, which had particular tastes, in an attempt to clarify the effect of peptides and amino acids on flavour (Salles etal., 1995). Preininger et al. (1996) used an unripened cheese matrix to evaluate both volatile and non-volatile flavour components of two Swiss cheese samples. A similar study was conducted on Emmental cheese and reduced-fat Cheddar cheeses (Rychlik etal., 1997; Suriyaphan etal., 1999). Suriyaphan etal. (2001) identified key chemical volatile components of cowy/barny and earth/bell pepper sensory perceived flavours in selected aged British Farmhouse cheeses. In this study, sensory properties were identified by descriptive sensory analysis, aroma volatiles were quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and aroma properties described by GC-O. Suspected key volatiles were selected from GC-O data based on aroma properties and flavour dilution values. The selected aroma components were subsequently incorporated into mild (bland) cheese across the concentration range encountered in the Farmhouse cheeses and evaluated by descriptive analysis. Studies such as these provide convincing evidence of the contribution of particular compounds to flavour. Model systems have not as yet provided insights into the role of compound mixtures and the role of compounds at sub-threshold levels. These are complex issues and will require extensive future research. An alternative approach to determining the influence of composition on sensory character is to use multivariate statistical techniques, such as PLS, to determine
482
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
relationships between compositional data and quantitative descriptive sensory data. This technique has the advantage of enabling comparison of all mathematically possible combinations of compositional variables with perceived intensity of one or more sensory characteristics, following theoretically the principle of the component balance theory (Mulder, 1952). The validity and value of relationships determined in this way will depend on the amount and type of compositional data collected, and the accuracy of both the compositional and the sensory data. Lawlor et al. (2001, 2002, 2003) determined predictive models using this technique for numerous flavour and texture attributes described in a wide variety of cheese types. Many studies have also been conducted to explore the relationships between sensory properties, compositional measurements and instrumental measurements of cheese texture (Wium et al., 1997; Bachmann et al., 1999; Drake etal., 1999b; Antoniou etal., 2000; Benedito etal., 2000; Truong etal., 2002) and to devise instrumental methods to assess more accurately or predict sensory properties of cheese (Sorensen and Jepsen, 1998; Breuil and Meullenet, 2001; Meullenet and Finney, 2002). Lawlor et al. (2001, 2002, 2003), using PLS, determined relationships between gross composition and perceived texture for a wide variety of cheeses, and found a number of consistent relationships. In particular, it was found that firmness was positively correlated with protein and mineral salt content, and negatively correlated with moisture and pH. Both hand and mouth terms can be used for sensory analysis of cheese texture (Drake et al., 1999c). In general, empirical texture tests and large-strain tests (compression) have been shown to correlate well with sensory bite terms (firmness, elasticity) although the correlation varies with cheese type, instrumental test and specific sensory term and definition. More recently, Brown et al. (2003) demonstrated specific knowledge gaps in relating sensory chewdown terms to rheological tests. Sensory rigidity and resiliency terms were correlated with rheological tests. However, chewdown terms such as 'degree of breakdown', 'cohesiveness', 'adhesiveness', 'smoothness of mass' and 'smoothness of mouth coating' were not related to instrumental tests. Additional work is needed to investigate the role that fundamental rheological tests can play in differentiating and relating to these important sensory texture parameters in cheese.
Conclusions The sensory characteristics of cheese determine the eating quality of cheese and consumer acceptability. The appearance, flavour and texture of cheese are extremely complex, not simply due to the very wide
diversity of cheese types that are produced, but also the many stages that any cheese goes through during its production and ripening. The complex composition and structure of cheese stimulate each of the human sensory modalities at approximately the same time, resulting in an integrated perception that a consumer responds to during and after cheese consumption. The dairy industry, including cheese production and marketing, has relied on outdated grading and judging methods for quality control and product development for many years. While these methods still have use, objective descriptive analysis techniques are increasingly being applied in cheese quality research in parallel with innovative studies of cheesemaking, cheese composition and consumer acceptability of cheese. Advances in the application of objective sensory science techniques have improved understanding of the relationships between these factors and the sensory attributes of cheese. However, direct comparison of research findings between different laboratories working with the same cheese type, and between studies on different types of cheese, will not be possible until such time as a universal language to describe cheese sensory character is defined and standardised.
References Adhikari, K., Heymann, H. and Huff, H.E. (2003). Textual characteristics of lowfat, fullfat and smoked cheeses: sensory and instrumental approaches, Food Qual. Pref. 14, 211-218. Antoniou, K.D., Petridis, D., Raphaelides, S., Omar, Z.B. and Kesteloot, R. (2000). Texture assessment of French cheeses. J. Food 5ci. 65, 168-172. Arnold, G.M. and Williams, A.A. (1986). The use of generalised procrustes techniques in sensory analysis, in, Statistical Procedures in Food Research, J.R. Piggott, ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 238-254. Aston, J.W., Gilles, J.E., Durward, I.G. and Dulley,J.R. (1985). Effect of elevated ripening temperatures on proteolysis and flavour development in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Res. 52, 565-572. Bachmann, H.P., Butikofer, U. and Meyer, J. (1999). Prediction of flavour and texture development in Swiss-type cheeses. Lebensm. Wiss. TechnoI. 32,284-289. Banks, J.M., Hunter, E.A. and Muir, D.D. (1993). Sensory properties of low fat Cheddar: effect of salt content and adjunct culture.J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 46, 119-123. Banks, J.M., Yvon, M., Gripon, J.C., de la Fuente, M.A., Brechany, E.Y., Williams, A.G. and Muir, D.D. (2001). Enhancement of amino acid catabolism in Cheddar cheese using ot-ketoglutarate: amino acid degradation in relation to volatile compounds and aroma character. Int. Dairy J. 11,235-243. Barcenas, P., Perez Elortondo, EJ., Salmeron, J. and Albisu, M. (1999). Development of a preliminary sensory lexicon
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
and standard references of ewes' milk cheeses aided by multivariate statistical procedures. J. Sens. Stud. 14, 161-179. B~ircenas, P., Perez de San Roman, R., Perez Elortondo, EJ. and Albisu, M. (2001). Consumer preference structures for traditional Spanish cheese and their relationship with sensory properties. Food Qual. Pref. 12, 269-279. Barcenas, P., Peres Elortondo, EJ. and Albisu, M. (2003). Comparison of free choice profiling, direct similarity measurements and hedonic data for ewe's milk cheeses sensory evaluation. Int. Dairy J. 13, 67-77. Benedito, J., Gonzalez, R., Rossello, C. and Mulet, A. (2000). Instrumental and expert assessment of Mahon cheese texture. J. Food Sci. 65, 1170-1174. Berodier, E, Lavanchy, P., Zannoni, M., Casals, J., Herrero, L. and Adamo, C. (1997a). Guide to the Smell, Aroma and Taste Evaluation of Hard and Semi-hard Cheeses, G.E.CO.TE.ET., Poligny, France. Berodier, E, Stevenot, C. and Schlich, P. (1997b). Descripteurs de l'arome du fromage de Comte. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 30, 298-304. Bodyfeh, EW., Tobias, J. and Trout, G.M. (1988). The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Bogue, J.C., Delahunty, C.M., Henry, M. and Murray, J.M. (1999). Market-oriented methodologies to optimise consumer acceptability of Cheddar-type cheese. Br. Food J. 101,301-316. Bom Frost, M., Dijksterhuis, G.B. and Martens, M. (2001). Sensory perception of fat in milk. Food Qual. Pref. 12, 327-336. Brandt, M.A., Skinner, E.Z. and Coleman, J.A. (1963). Texture profile method. J. Food Sci. 28,404-409. Breuil, P. and Meullenet, J.E (2001). A comparison of three instrumental tests for predicting sensory texture profiles of cheese.J. Text. Stud. 32, 41-55. Broadbent, J.R., Barnes, M., Brennand, C., Strickland, M., Houck, K., Johnson, M.E. and Steele, J.L. (2002). Contribution of Lactococcus lactis cell envelope proteinase specificity to peptide accumulation and bitterness in reduced fat Cheddar cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1778-1785. Brown, J.A., Foegeding, E.A., Daubert, C.R. and Drake, M.A. (2003). Changes in rheological and sensorial properties of young cheeses as related to maturation. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3054-3067. Cairncross, S.E. and SjOstrom, L.B. (1950). Flavour profiles: a new approach to flavour problems. Food Technol. 4, 308-311. Clydesdale, EM. (1993). Color as a factor in food choice. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 33, 83-101. Cooper, H.R. (1987). Texture in dairy products and its sensory evaluation, in, Food Texture: Instrumental and Sensory Measurement, H.W. Moskowitz, ed., Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 217-250. Dacremont, C. and Vickers, Z. (1994a). Classification of cheeses according to their closeness to the Cheddar cheese concept. J. Sens. Stud. 9, 237-246.
483
Dacremont, C. and Vickers, Z. (1994b). Concept matching techniques for assessing importance of volatile compounds for Cheddar cheese aroma. J. Food Sci. 59,981-985. Delahunty, C.M. and Murray, J.M. (1997). Organoleptic evaluation of cheese, in, Proceedings of the 5th Cheese Symposium, T.M. Cogan, P.E Fox and R.P. Ross, eds, Dairy Products Research Centre, Fermoy, Ireland. pp. 90-97. Delahunty, C.M. and Piggott, J.R. (1995). Current methods to evaluate contribution and interactions of components to flavour using hard cheese as an example. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 30, 555-570. Delahunty, C.M., Piggott, J.R., Conner, J.M. and Paterson, A. (1996a). Flavour evaluation of Cheddar cheese, in, Flavor-Food Interactions. ACS Symposium Series 63, R.J. McGorrin and J.V. Leland, eds, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp. 202-216. Delahunty, C.M., Piggott, J.R., Conner, J.M. and Paterson, A. (1996b). Comparison of dynamic flavour release from hard cheese and analysis of headspace volatiles from the mouth with flavour perception during consumption. J. Sci. Food Agric. 71,273-281. Drake, M.A. and Civille, G.V. (2003). Flavor Lexicons. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. 2, 33-40. Drake, M.A. and Swanson, B.G. (1996). Fat mimetics in low fat cheeses. J. Food Sci. 61, 1267-1270. Drake, M.A., Boylston, T.D., Spence, K.D. and Swanson, B.G. (1996). Chemical and sensory effects of a Lactobacillus adjunct in Cheddar cheese. Food Res. Int. 29, 381-387. Drake, M.A., Boylston, T.D., Spence, K.D. and Swanson, B.G. (1997). Improvement of sensory quality of reduced fat Cheddar cheese with a Lactobacillus adjunct. Food Res. Int. 30, 35-40. Drake, M.A., Truong, V.D. and Daubert, C.R. (1999a). Rheological and sensory properties of reduced fat processed cheeses containing lecithin. J. Food Sci. 64, 744-747. Drake, M.A., Gerard, P.D., Truong, V.D. and Daubert, C.R. (1999b). Relationship between instrumental and sensory measurements of cheese texture. J. Text. Stud. 30, 451-476. Drake, M.A., Gerard, P.D. and Civille, G.V. (1999c). Ability of hand evaluation versus mouth evaluation to differentiate texture of cheese. J. Text. Stud. 14, 425-441. Drake, M.A., McIngvale, S.C., Cadwallader, K.R. and Civille, G.V. (2001). Development of a descriptive sensory language for Cheddar cheese. J. Food Sci. 66, 1422-1427. Drake, M.A., Gerard, ED., Wright, S., Cadwallader, K.R. and Civille, G.V. (2002). Cross validation of a sensory language for Cheddar cheese. J. Sensory Studies 17, 215-229. Drake, M.A., Gerard, P.D., Kleinhenz, J.P. and Harper, W.J. (2003). Application of an electronic nose to correlate with descriptive sensory analysis of aged Cheddar cheese. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 36, 13-20. Elmore, J.R., Heymann, H., Johnson, J. and Hewett, J.E. (1999). Preference mapping: relating acceptance of "creaminess" to a descriptive sensory map of a semi-solid. Food Qual. Pref. 10, 465-475.
484
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Engel, E., Nicklaus, S., Septier, C., Salles, C. and Le Quere, J.L. (2000). Taste active compounds in a goat cheese watersoluble extract. 2. Determination of the relative impact of water-soluble extract components on its taste using omission tests. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 4260-4267. Fenelon, M.A., Guinee, T.P., Delahunty, C., Murray, J. and Crowe, E (2000). Composition and sensory attributes of retail Cheddar cheese with different fat contents. J. Food Comp. Anal. 13, 13-26. Frank, R.A. and Byram, J. (1988). Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem. Senses 13, 445-455. Friedrich, J.E. and Acree, T.E. (1998). Gas chromatography olfactometry (GC/O) of dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 8, 235-241. Grappin, R. and Beuvier, E. (1997). Possible implications of milk pasteurization on the manufacture and sensory quality of ripened cheese. Int. DairyJ. 7,751-761. Gwartney, E.A., Foegeding, E.A. and Larick, D.K. (2002). The texture of commercial full-fat and reduced-fat cheese. J. Food Sci. 67,812-816. Hannon, J.A., Wilkinson, M., Wallace, J.M., Delahunty, C.M., Morrissey, P.A. and Beresford, T.P. (2003). The use of elevated ripening temperatures to accelerate the ripening of Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J., submitted for publication. Heisserer, D.M. and Chambers IV, E. (1993). Determination of the sensory flavour attributes of aged natural cheese. J. Sens. Stud. 8, 121-132. Hirst, D., Muir, D.D. and Naes, T. (1994). Definition of the sensory properties of hard cheese: a collaborative study between Scottish and Norwegian panels. Int. Dairy J. 4, 743-761. Hort, J. and Le Grys, G. (2001). Developments in the textural and rheological properties of UK Cheddar cheese during ripening. Int. DairyJ. 11,475-481. Hough, G., Califano, A.N., Bertola, N.C., Bevilacqua, A.E., Martinez, E., Vega, M.J. and Zaritzky, N.E. (1996). Partial least squares correlations between sensory and instrumental measurements of flavor and texture for Reggianito grating cheese. Food Qual. Pref. 7, 47-53. Hunter, E.A. and McEwan, J.A. (1998). Evaluation of an international ring trial for sensory profiling of hard cheese. Food Qual. Pref. 9,343-354. IDF (1997). Sensory Evaluation of Diary Products by Scoring, Standard 99C, International Dairy Federation, Brussels. ISO (1983a). Sensory Analysis, Methodology, Paired Comparison Test, Standard 5495, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO (1983b). Sensory Analysis, Methodology, Triangular Test, Standard 4120, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO (1988). Sensory Analysis, Methodology, Ranking, Standard 8587, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO (1991). Sensory Analysis, Methodology, Duo-trio Test, Standard 10339, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Jack, ER., Piggott, J.R. and Paterson, A. (1993). Discrimination of texture and appearance in Cheddar cheese using consumer free choice profiling. J. Sens. Stud. 8, 167-176. Jack, ER., Piggott, J.R. and Paterson, A. (1994). Analysis of textural changes in hard cheeses during mastication by progressive profiling. J. Food Sci. 59,539-543. Karrer, T. and Bartoshuk, L. (1995). Effects of capsaicin desensitization on taste in humans. Physiol. Behav. 57, 421-429. Kosikowski, EV. and Mistry, V.V. (1997). Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods. Volume II: Procedures and Analysis, 3rd edn, EV. Kosikowski, L.L.C., Westport, CT. Langron, S.P. (1983). The application of procrustes statistics to sensory profiling, in, Sensory Quality in Foods and Beverages: Definition, Measurement and Control, A.A. Williams and R.K. Atkins, eds, Ellis Horwood, Chichester. pp. 89-95. Lavanchy, P., Berodier, E, Zannoni, M., Noel, Y., Adamo, C., Squella, J. and Herrero, L. (1994). A Guide to the Sensory Evaluation of Texture of Hard and Semi-hard Cheeses, INRA, Paris. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. (1998). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Practices and Principals, Chapman & Hall, New York. Lawless, H.T., Antinone, M.J., Ledford, R.A. and Johnston, M. (1994). Olfactory responsiveness to diacetyl. J. Sensory Studies 9, 47-56. Lawlor, J.B., and Delahunty, C.M. (2000). The sensory profile and consumer preference for ten speciality cheeses. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 53, 28-36. Lawlor, J.B., Delahunty, C.M., Wilkinson, M.G. and Sheehan, J. (2001). Relationships between the sensory characteristics, neutral volatile composition and gross composition of ten cheese varieties. Le Lait 81,487-507. Lawlor, J.B., Delahunty, C.M., Wilkinson, M.G. and Sheehan, J. (2002). Relationships between the gross, non-volatile and volatile compositions and the sensory attributes of eight hard-type cheeses. Int. DairyJ. 12,493-509. Lawlor, J.B., Delahunty, C.M., Sheehan, J. and Wilkinson, M.G. (2003). Relationships between sensory attributes and the volatile compounds, non-volatile and gross compositional constituents of six blue-type cheeses, Int. Dairy J. 13, 481-494. Lee III, W.E. and Pangborn, R.M. (1986). Time-intensity: the temporal aspects of sensory perception, Food Technol. 40, 71-78, 82. Lobato-Calleros, C., Robles-Martinez, J.C., Caballero-Perez, J.E and Aguirre-Mandujano, E. (2001). Fat replacers in low fat Mexican Manchego cheese. J. Text. Stud. 32, 1-14. Lynch, J., Liu, Y.-H., Mela, D.J. and MacFie, H.J.H. (1993). A time-intensity study of the effect of oil mouthcoatings on taste perception. Chem. Senses 18, 121-129. Lynch, C.M., Muir, D.D., Banks, J.M., McSweeney, P.L.H. and Fox, P.E (1999). Influence of adjunct cultures of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei on Cheddar cheese ripening. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 1618-1628. Maarse, H. and Visscher, C.A. (1996). Volatile Compounds in Foods: Qualitative and Quantitative Data, 7th edn, TNO
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Biotechnology and Chemistry Institute, Zeist, The Netherlands. MacFie, H.J. and Hedderly, D. (1993). Current practice in relating sensory perception to instrumental measurements. Food Qual. Pref. 4, 41-49. Madsen, J.S. and Ardo, Y. (2001). Exploratory study of proteolysis, rheology, and sensory properties of Danbo cheese with different fat contents. Int. Dairy J. 11, 423-431. Martens, M. and Martens, H. (1986). Partial least squares regression, in, Statistical Procedures in Food Research, J.R. Piggott, ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 293-359. Martin, N., Molimard, P., Spinnler, H.E. and Schlich, P. (2000). Comparison of odour sensory profiles performed by two independent trained panels following the same descriptive analysis procedures. Food Qual. Pref. 11,487-495. McBride, R.L. and Hall, C. (1979). Cheese grading v. consumer acceptability: an inevitable discrepancy. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 34, 66-68. McBride, R. and Muir, D.M. (1999). The grading and sensory profiling of cheese, in, Technology of Cheesemaking, B.A. Law, ed., Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield. pp. 281-314. McEwan, J.A. (1995). Preference mapping for product optimisation, in, Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, T. Naes and E. Risvik, eds, Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 71-102. McEwan, J.A., Moore, J.D. and Colwill, J.S. (1989). The sensory characteristics of Cheddar cheese and their relationship with acceptability. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 42, 112-117. Meilgaard, M.C., Civille, G.V. and Cart, B.T. (1999). Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 3rd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Mela, D.J. (1988). Sensory assessment of fat content in fluid dairy products. Appetite 10, 37-44. Meullenet, J.E and Finney, M.L. (2002). Measurement of biting velocities and predetermined and individual crosshead speed instrumental imitative tests for predicting cheese hardness. J. Texture Studies 33, 45-58. Mistry, V.V. (2001). Low fat cheese technology. Int. Dairy J. l l , 413-422. Monnet, J.C., Berodier, E and Badot, P.M. (2000). Characterization and localization of a cheese georegion using edaphic criteria (Jura Mountains, France). J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1692-1704. Muir, D.D. and Banks, J.M. (1993). Sensory evaluation of Cheddar. Dairy Ind. Int. 58, 47-50. Muir, D.D. and Hunter, E.A. (1992a). Sensory evaluation of Cheddar cheese: the relation of sensory properties to perception of maturity. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 45, 23-30. Muir, D.D. and Hunter, E.A. (1992b). Sensory evaluation of Cheddar cheese: order of tasting and carry-over effects. Food Qual. Pref. 3, 141-145. Muir, D.D. and Hunter, E.A. (1992c). Sensory evaluation of fermented milks: vocabulary development and the relations between sensory properties and composition and between acceptability and sensory properties. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 45, 73-80.
485
Muir, D., Banks, J.M. and Hunter, E.A. (1995a). Sensory properties of cheese, in, Proceedings of the 4th Cheese Symposium, T.M. Cogan, P.E Fox and R.P. Ross, eds, National Dairy Products Research Centre, Fermoy. pp. 25-31. Muir, D.D., Hunter, E.A., Banks, J.M. and Horne, D.S. (1995b). Sensory properties of hard cheese: identification of key attributes. Int. Dairy J. 5, 157-177. Muir, D.D., Hunter, E.A., Banks, J.M. and Home, D.S. (1995c). Sensory properties of hard cheese: changes during maturation. Food Res. Int. 28, 561-568. Muir, D.D., Hunter, E.A. and Watson, M. (1995d). Aroma of cheese. 1: sensory characterisation, Milchwissenschaft 50, 499-503. Muir, D.D., Banks, J.M. and Hunter, E.A. (1996). Sensory properties of Cheddar cheese: effect of starter type and adjunct. Int. Dairy J. 6,407-423. Muir, D.D., Banks, J.M. and Hunter, E.A. (1997a). A comparison of flavour and texture of Cheddar cheese of factory or farmhouse origin. Int. Dairy J. 7,479-485. Muir, D.D., Hunter, E.A., Watson, M. (1997b). Aroma of cheese. 2. Contribution of aroma to overall flavour. Milchwissenschaft 52, 85-88. Mulder, H. (1952). Taste and flavour forming substances in cheeses. Neth. Milk DairyJ. 6, 157-168. Murray, J.M. and Delahunty, C.M. (2000a). Mapping preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Qual. Pref. 11,419-435. Murray, J.M. and Delahunty, C.M. (2000b). Selection of standards to reference terms in a Cheddar cheese flavour language. J. Sensory Studies 15, 179-199. Murray, J.M. and Delahunty, C.M. (2000c). Consumer preference for Irish farmhouse and factory cheeses. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 39,433-449. Murray, J.M., Delahunty, C.M. and Baxter, I. (2001). Descriptive sensory analysis: a review. Food Res. Int. 34, 461-471. Nielsen, R.G. and Zannoni, M. (1998). Progress in developing an international protocol for sensory profiling of hard cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 31, 57-64. Noble, A.C. (1996). Taste-aroma interactions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 7,439-444. Ordohez, A.I., Ibafmz, EC., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (1998). Application of multivariate analysis to sensory characterization of ewes' milk cheese. J. Sens. Stud. 13, 45-55. O'Riordan, P.J. and Delahunty, C.M. (2003a). Characterisation of commercial Cheddar cheese flavour. 1: traditional and electronic nose approach to quality assessment and market classification. Int. Dairy J. 13,355-370. O'Riordan, P.J. and Delahunty, C.M. (2003b). Characterisation of commercial Cheddar cheese flavour. 2: study of Cheddar cheese discrimination by composition, volatile compounds and descriptive flavour assessment. Int. Dairy J. 13,371-389. O'Riordan, P.J., Delahunty, C.M., Sheehan, E.M. and Morrissey, P.A. (1998). Comparisons of volatile compounds released during consumption of a complex food by different consumers with expressions of perceived flavor determined by free-choice profiling. J. Sens. Stud. 13, 435-459.
486
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
Papademas, P. and Robinson, R.K. (2001). The sensory characteristics of different types of halloumi cheese as perceived by tasters of different ages. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54, 94-99. Parolari, G., Virgili, R., Panari, G. and Zannoni, M. (1994). Development of a vocabulary of terms for sensory evaluation of Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese by flee-choice profiling. Ital. J. Food Sci. 3, 317-324. Peryam, D.R. and Girardot, N.E (1952). Advanced taste test method. Food Eng. 24, 58-61. Piggott, J.R. (1988). Sensory Analysis of Foods, 2nd edn, Elsevier Applied Science, Barking, Essex. Piggott, J.R. and Mowat, R.G. (1991). Sensory aspects of maturation of Cheddar cheese by descriptive analysis. J. Sens. Stud. 6, 49-62. Preininger, M., Warmke, R. and Grosch, W. (1996). Identification of the character impact flavour compounds of Swiss cheese by sensory studies of models. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 202, 30-34. Roberts, A.K. and u Z.M. (1994). A comparison of trained and untrained judges evaluation of sensory attribute intensities and liking of Cheddar cheeses. J. Sens. Stud. 9, 1-20. Robinson, R.K. and Wilbey, R.A. (1998). Cheesemaking Practice, R Scott 3rd edn., Aspen Publications, Inc., Gaithesburg, MD. Rychlik, M., Warmke, R. and Grosch, W. (1997). Ripening of Emmental cheese wrapped in foil with and without addition of Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei. III. Analysis of character impact flavour compounds. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 30,471-478. Salles, C., Septier, C., Roudot-Algaron, E, Guillot, A. and t~tievant, P.X. (1995). Sensory and chemical analysis of fractions obtained by gel permeation of water soluble Comte cheese extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43, 1659-1668. Schlich, P. (1995). Preference mapping: relating consumer preferences to sensory or instrumental measurements, in, Bioflavour 95, P. Etievant and P. Schreier, eds, INRA, Paris. pp. 135-150. Shakeel-ur-Rehman, Farkye, N. and Drake, M.A. (2003a). Effects of standardization of whole milk with dry milk protein concentrate on the yield and ripening of reduced-fat Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 1608-1615. Shakeel-ur-Rehman, Farkye, N. and Drake, M.A. (2003b). Reduced-fat Cheddar cheese from a mixture of cream and liquid milk protein concentrate. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 56, 94-98. Shakeel-ur-Rehman, Farkye, N., Vedamuthu, E. and Drake, M.A. (2003c). A preliminary study on the effect of adding yeast extract to cheese curd on proteolysis and flavor development of reduced fat Cheddar. J. Dairy Res. 70, 99-103. Shakeel-ur-Rehman, Farkye, N. and Drake, M.A. (2003d). The ripening of smoked Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 1910-1917. Shamil, S., Wyeth, L.J. and Kilcast, D. (1991/92). Flavour release and perception in reduced-fat foods. Food Qual. Pref. 3, 51-60.
Sorensen, L.K. and Jepsen, R. (1998). Assessment of sensory properties of cheese by near-infrared spectroscopy. Int. DairyJ. 8,863-871. Stampanoni, C.R. (1993a). Quantitative flavour profiling: an effective tool in flavour perception. Food Marketing Technol. February, 4-8. Stampanoni, C.R. (1993b). The quantitative profiling technique. Perfum. Flavour. 18, 19-24. Stampanoni, C.R. (1994). The use of standardized flavor languages and quantitative flavor profiling technique for flavoured dairy products, J. Sens. Stud. 9, 383-400. Stevenson, R.J., Prescott, J. and Boakes, R. (1999). Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem. Senses 24, 627-635. Stone, S. and Sidel, J.L. (1993). Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd edn, Academic Press, Inc., London. Stone, H., Sidel, J., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A. and Singleton, R.C. (1974). Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28, 24-34. Suriyaphan, O., Drake, M.A. and Cadwallader, K.R. (1999). Identification of volatile off-flavors in reduced-fat Cheddar cheeses containing lecithin. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 32,250-254. Suriyaphan, O., Drake, M.A., Chen, X.Q. and Cadwallader, K.R. (2001). Characteristic aroma components of British Farmhouse Cheddar cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 1382-1387. Thompson, D.M.H. and MacFie, H.J.H. (1983). Is there an alternative to descriptive sensory assessment?, in, Sensory Quality in Food and Beverages: Definition, Measurement and Control, A.A. Williams and R.K. Atkin, eds., Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester. pp. 96-107. Truong, V.D., Daubert, C.R., Drake, M.A. and Baxter, S.R. (2002). Vane rheometry for textural characterization of Cheddar cheese: correlation with other instrumental and sensory measurements. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 35, 305-314. Urbach, G. (1993). Relations between cheese flavour and chemical composition. Int. Dairy J. 3,389-422. Virgili, R., Parolari, G., Bolzoni, L., Barbieri, G., Mangia, A., Careri, M., Spagnoli, S., Panari, G. and Zannoni, M. (1994). Sensory chemical relationships in ParmigianoReggiano cheese. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 27,491-495. Warmke, R., Belitz, H.D. and Grosch, W. (1996). Evaluation of taste compounds of Swiss cheese (Emmentaler). Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 203,230-235. Weel, K.G.C., Boelrijk, A.E.M., Alting, A.C., van Mil, P.J.J.M., Burger, J.J., Gruppen, H., Voragen, A.G.J. and Smit, G. (2002). Flavor release and perception of flavored whey protein gels: perception is determined by texture rather than by release. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 5149-5155. Wendin, K., Langton, M., Caous, L. and Hall, G. (2000). Dynamic analyses of sensory and microstructural properties of cream cheese, Food Chem. 71,363-378. Williams, A.A. (1994). Flavour q u a l i t y - understanding the relationship between sensory responses and
Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation
chemical stimuli. What are we trying to do? The data, approaches and problems. Food Qual. Pref. 5, 3-16. Williams, A.A. and Langron, S.P. (1984). Use of free-choice profiling for evaluation of commercial ports. J. Sci. Food Agric. 35,558-568.
487
Wium, H., Gross, M. and Qvist, K.B. (1997). Uniaxial compression of UF-Feta cheese related to sensory texture analysis. J. Text. Stud. 28,455-476. Young, N., Drake, M.A., Lopetcharat, K. and McDaniel, M. (2004). Preference mapping of Cheddar cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 11-i9.
Cheese Flavour: Instrumental Techniques J.-L. Le Qu~r~, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Unite Mixte de Recherche sur les Ar6mes (UMRA), Dijon, France
Introduction The sensory properties of food are important determinants in the choice of foodstuffs by the consumer, and flavour plays a prominent role in this context. Flavour may be defined as the combination of taste and odour, sensations of pain, heat and cold (chemesthesis or trigeminal sensitivity), and tactile sensation. Sensory analysis is clearly the most valid means of measuring flavour characteristics. Applied to cheese flavour, sensory evaluation is a prominent descriptive tool which is used widely in dairy science and industry (Issanchou et al., 1997; see also 'Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation', Volume 1). However, determining flavour also means analysing volatile compounds that are sensed in the nose at the olfactory receptors either via the orthonasal (odour) or retronasal (aroma) routes when foods are eaten, non-volatile compounds sensed on the tongue (taste), and compounds perceived as mouthfeel and texture. Instrumental analyses of flavour have been used primarily to analyse volatile components. The main reason for this is the major importance of aroma in the overall flavour of a food, as is easily demonstrated by the difficulties encountered by subjects attempting to identify a particular flavour if the air flow through the nose is prevented, and the fact that volatile components are more amenable to conventional instrumental analysis than non-volatile compounds. Therefore, since the early studies published in the 1960s and the 1970s (Dumont and Adda, 1972, and references cited therein), instrumental methods have concentrated on identification of aroma compounds (Mariaca and Bosset, 1997). Only recently, some significant efforts have been made to develop instrumental procedures to characterise non-volatile components in cheese which are responsible for cheese taste (Salles et al., 1995a; Salles and Le Qu~r~, 1998; Engel et al., 2000a,b; Le Quere and Salles, 2001). Instrumental analysis of aroma volatiles has been the subject of important specialised treatises (for the most recent literature on the subject, see Ho and Manley, 1993; Marsili, 1997; Mussinan and Morello, 1998; Stephan etal., 2000; van Ruth, 2001a; Reineccius, 2002, and specifically for instrumental analysis of
volatiles in milk and dairy products see Delahunty and Piggott, 1995; Mariaca and Bosset, 1997). Therefore, the part of this chapter that will be devoted to the analysis of cheese volatiles will focus on particular techniques adapted to the particular characteristics of cheese. Cheese flavour components result from the principal biochemical degradation pathways: glycolysis, lipolysis and proteolysis (see 'Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview', 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening' and 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese During Ripening', Volume 1). The aroma compounds produced are mainly hydrophobic, or lipophilic, and consequently they tend to concentrate in the cheese fat according to their water/fat partition coefficient. Instrumental analysis of cheese volatiles must, therefore, consider, as a first step, an extraction method suitable for separating these volatiles from the cheese fat matrix. However, no single method yields a 'true' picture of a food aroma (Reineccius, 2002), and isolation and analysis of aroma remain challenging (Teranishi, 1998). Moreover, not only may the extraction step lead to artefacts, but the total volatile content in most cases is very difficult to relate to the flavour profile determined by a panel in sensory evaluation. Therefore, it appears much more efficient to concentrate efforts on the identification of those compounds that are really relevant to flavour. As no universally suitable extraction method exists, it appears essential to choose a method that yields an extract representative of the sensory properties of the food (Abbott et al., 1993; Eti~vant et al., 1994; Eti~vant and Langlois, 1998). Once this extraction method has been chosen, the next steps involve various forms of gas chromatography among which gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) plays a prominent role in determining the key volatile compounds that contribute significantly to the flavour of the food (Leland et al., 2001), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which is essential for the identification of those key odorants. Water-soluble extracts (WSE) from cheese have strong flavours (Biede and Hammond, 1979; McGugan
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 1: General Aspects ISBN: 0-1226-3652-X Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
490
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
et al., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986). Such extracts contain some volatile compounds (Le Quere et al., 1996; Engels et al., 1997; Le Quere and Salles, 2001), partly extracted by water according to their water/fat partition coefficient, although flavour compounds are generally more lipophilic than hydrophilic. However, the water extract mainly contains non-volatile compounds. This non-volatile, water-soluble fraction is composed of mineral salts, lactic acid, lactose, amino acids and peptides and has characteristic taste properties (Salles et al., 1995a). Amino acids and small peptides are considered to be mainly responsible for the taste characteristics of water-soluble extracts (McGugan et al., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986), their flavour impact being modulated by interaction with calcium and magnesium ions (Biede and Hammond, 1979). Moreover, it has been recognised for a long time that water-soluble, low molecular weight and mainly hydrophobic peptides, which accumulate during ripening as a result of proteolysis, are responsible for bitterness in cheese (Lowrie and Lawrence, 1972; Schalinatus and Behnke, 1975; Furtado, 1984; Lemieux and Simard, 1992). Some fundamental studies on model compounds have characterised the tastes of amino acids and low molecular weight peptides (Salles et al., 1995a and references cited therein); studies conducted on tastes in casein hydrolysates were reviewed by RoudotAlgaron (1996). However, until recently and apart from bitterness, no clear sensory data were obtained on water-soluble extracts from cheese. Although several hundred peptides have been isolated and identified from various types of cheese, only a few small peptides, that are suspected to be responsible for particular tastes, were isolated from the water-soluble fractions of various cheeses and identified (Salles et al., 1995a and references cited therein). However, no direct correlations between these peptides and the organoleptic properties of the fractions have been demonstrated, apart from bitterness. In fact, the watersoluble fraction of cheese generally has a very complex composition, and separation and identification of individual compounds are difficult. Moreover, most analytical techniques require the use of non-food-grade solvents or buffers that make sensory evaluation of sub-fractions difficult or impossible. Part of this chapter will focus on recent advances made to study and identify the taste-active components present in the water-soluble fraction of cheese. A general procedure for the preparation of fractions involves an extraction of grated cheese by water followed by a fractionation scheme, generally adapted from the fractionation protocol used to isolate cheese nitrogen fractions in the study of proteolysis in cheese during ripening (Fox et al., 1994; McSweeney and
Fox, 1997). However, as sub-fractions have to be evaluated sensorially to assess their relative sensory impact and try to link it to their chemical composition, a suitable eluent has to be used in the chromatographic steps. Water (Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993; Salles et al., 1995a; Molina et al., 1999) or water-food-grade ethanol mixtures (Lee and Warthesen, 1996a,b) have been used for this purpose in combination with gel permeation chromatography (GPC) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The final identification step generally involves mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) of nitrogenous compounds isolated using HPLC, either in a standalone mode or coupled with a mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS) (Roudot-Algaron etal., 1993, 1994b; Sommerer et al., 2001). A specific method for the isolation of small peptides from cheese has been described (Sommerer et al., 1998a). As already outlined for cheese aroma, the relationships between all flavour compounds identified in a food and sensory perception experienced by consumers when eating this food are still not entirely clear. In fact, it is particularly difficult to predict a flavour perception as it is still not known how the various components combine to produce an overall sensory impression. Moreover, interactions between taste and aroma (Noble, 1996) and interactions of trigeminal sensations with taste and aroma (Green, 1996) occur and play an important role in overall flavour perception. However, methods that allow direct analysis of flavour molecules released in the mouth during consumption have been developed in recent years (Taylor and Linforth, 1996; Roberts and Taylor, 2000). Development of instrumental techniques and data obtained recently for volatile and non-volatile flavour compounds in cheese will be presented which may explain the link between flavour perception and cheese composition. Finally, specific instrumental techniques have been developed for the analysis of the complete flavour of cheese. The methods currently used in the quality control of food flavour are still usually based on sensory evaluation by a panel of experts. These panels are able to monitor the quality of a particular food, to detect defects and to compare samples for classification purposes. Nevertheless, obtaining results rapidly at low cost using instruments could be desirable. The so-called 'electronic noses' based on gas sensor technology, despite some important drawbacks for some of them (Schaller et al., 2000a), are theoretically able to perform some classification tasks (Schaller etal., 1998), and some applications for the analysis of cheese have been developed (Mariaca and Bosset, 1997; Schaller et al., 1999). However, two other global
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
analysis methods based on mass spectrometry seem more powerful and reliable for purposes of classification. One of these methods analyses total headspace using a mass spectrometer, without any prior GC separation (Vernat and Berdague, 1995). This method is often referred to as a mass-based electronic nose. Alternatively, headspace sampling may be replaced by solidphase microextraction (SPME) of food volatiles (Marsili, 1999). Both sampling methods, followed directly by mass spectrometry, have found applications for the rapid characterisation of cheese (Schaller et al., 2000b; Peres et al., 2001, 2002a). The second method is pyrolysis }nass spectrometry (Aries and Gutteridge, 1987), where a small food sample is pyrolysed at up to 500 ~ The resulting volatile fraction, characteristic of the flavour but also of the matrix composition, is analysed by a mass spectrometer. As with the other rapid instrumental methods for classification, a pattern or fingerprint is obtained for each sample, and extensive data treatment, either by conventional multivariate statistics or artificial neural networks, allows the construction of maps useful for classification and quality control purposes (Peres et al., 2002b).
Characterisation of Aroma (Volatiles) Sample treatment
Volatile aroma compounds in cheese, like in other foodstuffs, are hydrophobic, generally distributed in a heterogeneous manner throughout the matrix and present at low or even traces ( 10), modulated by their hydrophobicity (Molimard and Spinnler, 1993). A high-performance size-exclusion chromatographic method has also been described for the purification of aroma compounds from organic extracts of fat-containing food (Lubke et al., 1996). The method was applied
A
I IF i I
E m
E
m
Figure 2 Dialysis cell with solvent recycling device. A, B, cell compartments; C, round-bottom flask containing solvent to distil; D, condenser; E, magnetic stirrers; F, dialysis membrane.
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
successfully to the clean-up of a dichloromethane extract from goat cheese (L(ibke et al., 1996). The main interest in this size-exclusion chromatographic method is the limited number of injections necessary and the reduced final volume of the fractions, which in terms of final useful concentration, appeared significantly quicker and gave rise to less thermally induced artefacts and to reduced losses of the most volatile components than any other distillation method (Lobke et al., 1996). Headspace methods, either static or more often dynamic, also called 'purge-and-trap' methods, are popular techniques used to isolate volatiles from cheese. Although direct analysis of the equilibrium headspace would appear to be an ideal method to study aroma compounds, in terms of sensory representativeness and ease of use, static headspace techniques have severe limitations in terms of sensitivity, being restricted to the most volatile and abundant components (Mariaca and Bosset, 1997; Reineccius, 2002). Dynamic headspace, or 'purge-and-trap', methods are basically pre-concentration and enrichment techniques. They use stripping of the volatiles from the cheese samples, sometimes dispersed in water, with an inert gas. The volatiles are concentrated in a cold trap or adsorbed onto an inert support (adsorbing polymer, generally of the Tenax | type) and analysed by subsequent thermal desorption or elution by a suitable solvent (Mariaca and Bosset, 1997; van Ruth, 2001a; Reineccius, 2002). Although dynamic headspace methods minimise artefacts developed or introduced during sampling (van Ruth, 2001a), distortion of the aroma profile may result from the trapping of aromas (Reineccius, 2002), especially when polymeric adsorbents are used. However, despite the drawback of relatively poor sensitivity compared to other extraction methods, the main advantages of dynamic headspace techniques are the small amount of sample needed to perform the analysis (c. 20 g) and its speed (Le Quere and Molimard, 2002). The technique, even though it favours the isolation of the most volatile flavour compounds (Reineccius, 2002), has been applied widely to the analysis of cheese volatiles (see for example Arora et al., 1995; Canac-Arteaga et al., 1999a,b, 2000; Larrayoz et al., 2001; Rychlik and Bosset, 2001a,b). Recent comprehensive reviews on the technique include Wampler (1997) and Pillonel et al. (2002). A comparative study on the advantages of the use of dynamic headspace with cheese samples in the 'dry' form or in 'dispersed suspension' in water has been published recently (Larrayoz et al., 2001). The 'dry' method allowed the extraction of a greater number of compounds and in larger quantities, but a few compounds were extracted better using the 'suspension' technique (Larrayoz et al., 2001). Simultaneous distil-
493
lation extraction (SDE) was also used in this study and compared to dynamic headspace analysis. As expected, the authors concluded that the techniques were complementary; dynamic headspace extracted more highly volatile compounds and SDE was more efficient for phenols, free fatty acids, lactones and heavier aldehydes, ketones, alcohols and esters (Larrayoz et al., 2001). Interference from water in dynamic headspace that could be detrimental to the efficiency of the technique has been discussed in detail by Canac-Arteaga et al. (1999a,b, 2000) and Pillonel et al. (2002). Solid-phase microextraction, first developed for the extraction of volatile organic compounds in water, has been applied recently to the isolation of aroma compounds from food (Harmon, 1997; Pillonel et al., 2002; Reineccius, 2002). Solid-phase microextraction partitions analytes between a liquid or a vapour phase and a thin solid-phase adsorbent, of which there are several choices in terms of polarity and film thickness, coated on inert fibres, generally associated with a syringe which serves as a direct injection device (Harmon, 1997). The method, which is an equilibrium one, can be performed either in the direct extraction mode (immersion of the fibre in the sample matrix, generally in an aqueous solution or suspension) or in a headspace configuration. It can be automated very easily, but the extraction of the solutes depends on polarity, volatility, partition coefficients, sample volume, temperature and the nature of the adsorbentcoating material. Therefore, the technique exhibits a certain degree of selectivity, but with the advantages of sensitivity, ease of use, no solvent and small sample volume (Harmon, 1997; Pillonel et al., 2002; Reineccius, 2002). Solid-phase microextraction, used for the first time for the analyses of cheese volatiles by Chin et al. (1996), has since been used in some significant applications on cheese aroma (Dufour et al., 2001; Pillonel et al., 2002 and references cited therein). Analysing volatiles directly by immersing the fibre in highly complex matrices (as cheese) could damage the fibre, and SPME is, therefore, used almost always in the headspace mode. Comparison of direct SPME and headspace SPME of Camembert volatiles obtained after cryo-trapping of the aqueous phase under vacuum showed only a slight reduction in sensitivity using headspace SPME compared to direct SPME (Jaillais et al., 1999). The water-soluble extract (WSE) of cheese has been described for a long time as possessing a strong flavour (Biede and Hammond, 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986; Engels and Visser, 1994; Salles et al., 1995a). Besides non-volatile materials responsible for taste, WSE also contains volatile compounds responsible for its intense aroma. Thus, water-soluble extracts of various
494
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
cheeses, obtained by direct extraction with water followed by various centrifugation steps (Le Quere et al., 1996; Engels et al., 1997; Engel et al., 2002c) or by pressing to obtain an aqueous phase called 'cheese juice' (Salvat-Brunaud etal., 1995; Thierry etal., 1999), have been investigated for their volatile components. To be analysed using gas chromatography, WSEs were either extracted with a suitable solvent (Le Quere et al., 1996), submitted to dynamic headspace analysis (Engels et al., 1997; Thierry et al., 1999) or fractionated using nanofihration as the final membrane-filtration step (Engel et al., 2002c).
Representativeness As already outlined, because there is no universally applicable method, none of the extraction techniques described above yields an aroma isolate that truly represents either qualitatively or quantitatively the aroma profile of a food (Reineccius, 2002). This fact explains the frequently observed discrepancies between aroma analysis of a food extract and sensory analysis of the food itself. Therefore, the flavour analyst must choose the isolation procedure best suited to address the problem faced: determination of the complete aroma profile, identification of key odorants or off-flavours, monitoring aroma changes with time in foods or prediction of sensory properties (Reineccius, 2002). When the ultimate aim of a particular study is the identification of the compounds that are important for flavour (the key odorants), the most reliable results will be obtained if the odour of the extract resembles closely that of the food itself (Etievant et al., 1994; Etievant and Langlois, 1998). Different sensory methods, which necessitate a trained sensory panel, can be used to check the sensory representativeness of the food extract odours (Etievant et al., 1994). When an estimation of the relative importance of key constituents in a single sample is required, a similarity test is preferred. The panellists are asked to score the similarity of the odour of the extracts obtained by different methods to the odour of the food itself used as reference on an unstructured 10 cm scale. This approach was applied to three French and Swiss hardtype cheeses by Etievant et al. (1994) and Guichard (1995). It was shown that the distillates obtained at a pressure in the range 10-100 Pa had odours more similar to those of the cheeses than the distillates obtained at a lower pressure (10 mPa). This result means that strongly absorbed and less volatile flavour compounds, extracted only at lower pressure, may not be important for the odour of these cheeses. Similar results were obtained for extracts of Camembert cheese, showing clearly that the second step (molecular distillation operated under a high vacuum) is not necessary to obtain a representative distillate of the cheese odour.
When applied to goat milk cheese, this approach indicated that the best extract was obtained by a direct water extraction of the cheese volatiles (Le Quere et al., 1996). This result could perhaps be explained by the chemical and hydrophilic nature of the free fatty acids identified as key odorants of goat milk cheese (Le Quere et al., 1996; Salles and Le Qu~r~, 1998; Le Quer~ and Salles, 2001). A key point in these evaluations of representativeness is the choice of a suitable matrix for testing the olfactory character of the extracts. For cheese, the best results have been obtained when the extracts are added to an emulsion, i.e., a matrix similar to cheese in terms of fat composition (Etievant et al., 1994). Since, generally, a combination of techniques should be used to obtain a reasonably complete view of an aroma profile (Reineccius, 2002), it is noteworthy that sensory evaluation of headspace or SPME extracts by 'direct GC-olfactometry' (i.e., without a chromatographic column) has been demonstrated recently (Lecanu et al., 2002; Rega et al., 2003).
Identification of volatile aroma compounds using hyphenated GC techniques As aroma molecules are essentially volatile, the techniques used to analyse them are usually based on separation using high resolution gas chromatography (HRGC). Substantial progress has been made in this field during the last 20 years and several stationary phases are available which allow almost all separation problems to be overcome. Combined with universal or selective detectors, HRGC is clearly a fundamental technique, essential for all aroma identification studies. A comprehensive review on the use of HRGC for the analysis of milk and dairy products is available (Mariaca and Bosset, 1997). Other interesting comments on qualitative, including multidimensional GC (Wright, 1997), and quantitative aspects may be found in Marsili (1997), van Ruth (2001b) and Reineccius (2002). Among the hyphenated techniques that are coupled to HRGC, the one that uses the human nose as a detector and known as gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O, sometimes referred to as 'GC-sniffing'), has received considerable attention during the past 20 years in aroma research (see for example Blank, 1997; Leland et al., 2001; Reineccius, 2002). The selectivity of this specific detector is based only on the odorous properties of the individual compounds separated by HRGC. As the most abundant volatiles may have little, if any, odour of significance in a food (Mistry et al., 1997), GC-sniffing has been an invaluable tool for identifying target compounds in aroma extracts that are always very complex. The primary aim of this technique is to discriminate the odorous compounds from the many background volatile components. The so-called 'aromagram'
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
constructed from the chromatogram obtained by simply smelling a GC effluent (Blank, 1997; Reineccius, 2002) constitutes an interesting interface with sensory analysis, as odour descriptors sensed at the GC sniffing port can be compared to the descriptors generated by a sensory panel. This method is particularly efficient for identifying off-flavours. Selection of key odorants or character-impact compounds in a food is another objective of GC-sniffing. Quantitative approaches (the true GC-olfactometry) based on odour detection thresholds or on odour intensity have been developed and are the subject of specialised treatises (Mistry et al., 1997; Leland et al., 2001; van Ruth, 2001b; Reineccius, 2002). Three different methods have been developed for GC-O: dilution analyses based on determination of detection thresholds, detection frequency methods and intensity measurement methods. Original dilution methods, CHARM (for Combined Hedonic Aroma Measurement) analysis developed by Acree and co-workers (Acree et al., 1984) and Aroma Extract Dilution Analysis (AEDA) developed by Grosch and co-workers (Ullrich and Grosch, 1987) are essentially screening methodologies since the methods, based only on detection threshold determinations, violate certain sensory rules and psychophysical laws (Reineccius, 2002 and references cited therein). They can be used to determine those odorous compounds that are most likely to contribute to the odour of a food. Originally developed by McDaniel et al. (1990), the odour-specific magnitude estimation (OSME) method is basically a crossmodal technique aimed at measuring the perceived odour intensity of eluting volatiles. In OSME and other cross-modality matching methods (Guichard etal., 1995; Eti~vant et al., 1999), results are not based on odour detection thresholds, and only one concentration of the extract is evaluated by a panel, unlike dilution methods where several dilutions of the extract are evaluated. Results can be subjected to statistical analysis and more consistent results are obtained when panellists are trained (Callement et al., 2001). The detection frequency methods, originally developed by Roozen and co-workers (Linssen et al., 1993), and referred to as nasal impact frequency (NIF) or surface nasal impact frequency (SNIF) since the work of Chaintreau and co-workers (Pollien et al., 1997), also use a group of assessors who simply have to note when they detect an odour in a single GC run (i.e., also at only one concentration). Those GC peaks being detected as odorous by the greatest number of assessors are considered to be the most important. Not being based on real odour intensities, the method has important drawbacks, especially when all the odorous compounds are present above their sensory threshold for all the assessors (Reineccius, 2002).
495
There is no perfect GC-sniffing method for finding key odorants in foods. Each of the methods described above has its advantages and weaknesses. Only two studies have compared the methods in terms of performance (Le Guen et al., 2000; van Ruth and O'Connor, 2001). In both cases, the results obtained with the different techniques were found to be very similar and well correlated. Finally, the choice of a GC-O method depends on the objective of the study, on the quality of the panel and on the time scheduled for the analyses (Le Guen et al., 2000). Dilution techniques are clearly time-consuming, intensity methods require a trained panel (Le Guen et al., 2000; Callement et al., 2001) while detection frequency methods are the least demanding but also the least precise (Le Guen et al., 2000). The aim of any GC-O experiment is to determine the relative odour potency of volatiles present in an aroma extract or fraction and to prioritise compounds for identification. This identification step is done mainly through the use of another hyphenated technique that couples HRGC to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). For difficult identifications, GC coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (GC/FTIR) provides an interesting complement to GC-MS (Le Quire, 2000). Mass spectrometry is also used for quantification purposes through the use of a stable isotope dilution assay (Milo and Blank, 1998; Blank et al., 1999 and references cited therein). Such a precise quantitation is required for the determination of odour activity values (OAVs) generally calculated when using AEDA (Grosch, 1994). Odour activity values, calculated as the ratio of concentrations to odour thresholds, despite their limitations in terms of psychophysical validity (Mistry et al., 1997), give a good indication of the respective contributions of key odorants to the aroma of foods. They are the basis of the first attempts at using recombination studies to validate impact odorants sensorially in model cheeses (Grosch, 1994). Aroma-recombination studies are the important last step in sensorially verifying the analytical data obtained by GC-O and for quantification of key odorants of food (Mistry etal., 1997). Either bland unripened cheese (Grosch, 1994; Preininger etal., 1996; Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a) or specially designed odourless model cheese systems (Smitet al., 1995; Salles et al., 1995b) have been used to incorporate potential key odorants. Thus, the importance of methional, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone and 2-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone, acetic acid and propionic acid was confirmed as key compounds for the aroma of Emmental-type cheese (Preininger et al., 1996). The branched-chain volatile fatty acids, 4-methyloctanoic and 4-ethyloctanoic acids, were confirmed to be essential for the typical goaty note of goat cheese (Le Quere et al., 1996) and their
496 Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques retronasal aroma thresholds were determined in a cheese model (Salles and Le Quere, 1998; Le Quere and Salles, 2001; Salles et al., 2002). Finally, the odour profile of the aroma model built with a set of 11 potent odorants identified in a GC-O study of an extract from Camembert cheese (Kubickova and Grosch, 1997, 1998b), with four additional volatile compounds identified by headspace-GC-O, has been found to resemble closely the aroma of genuine French Camembert cheese (Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a; Grosch et al., 2001). The GC-O methods that have been developed during the past 20 years, combined with either aroma extracts, headspace or even SPME (Dufour et al., 2001), have facilitated the identification of potent odorants in various cheeses, including Swiss (Preininger and Grosch, 1994; Rychlik et al., 1997; Rychlik and Bosset, 2001a,b), Cheddar (Arora etal., 1995; Christensen and Reineccius, 1995; Dufour et al., 2001), ParmigianoReggiano (Qian and Reineccius, 2002a,b), Blue (Le Quere et al., 2002; Qian et al., 2002), Mozzarella (Moio et al., 1993), Grana Padano (Moio and Addeo, 1998) and Gorgonzola (Moio et al., 2000) cheeses.
Characterisation of Sapid (Non-Volatile) Flavour C o m p o u n d s Water-soluble extracts (WSE) of cheese The water-soluble extract (WSE) of cheese has been reported to possess a strong flavour (Biede and Hammond, 1979; McGugan etal., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986). Apart from some water-soluble volatile components responsible for aroma, a WSE of cheese contains mainly non-volatile components that have been considered to be responsible for the taste of cheese (McSweeney, 1997). It has been recognised for a long time that bitterness, which can limit cheese acceptability if too intense, is due to an excessive concentration of low molecular weight and mainly hydrophobic peptides, which accumulate during ripening as a result of proteolysis (Lemieux and Simard, 1992; McSweeney, 1997). Amino acids and small peptides were hypothesised to be mainly responsible for the basic taste of cheese (McGugan etal., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986; Engels and Visser, 1994), their flavour impact being supposedly influenced by their interaction with calcium and magnesium ions (Biede and Hammond, 1979). However, the exact role of medium- and smallsize peptides and free amino acids in cheese flavour has not been clearly demonstrated, although it is likely that they contribute to the background flavour of cheese (McSweeney, 1997). In fact, until recently and apart from bitterness, no clear sensory data have been available for
WSEs of cheese and no direct correlations between specific nitrogen-containing compounds and organoleptic properties of fractions have been demonstrated. Among the mineral salts present in the WSE of cheese, the compound responsible for the salty taste is almost always supposed to be NaC1 (McSweeney, 1997). The taste of most high molecular weight salts is known to be bitter rather than salty (McSweeney, 1997 and references cited therein). Acid taste is caused by H30 + and the principal acid in cheese is lactic acid. However, total lactate concentration does not seem to be a good index of cheese acidity as the pH may increase during ripening caused by the production of ammonia (McSweeney, 1997). Moreover, the perception of acidity in cheese was hypothesised to be influenced by the concentration of NaC1 (Stampanoni and Noble, 1991), and no correlation between acid taste and either cheese pH or the amount of lactic acid was found for the flavour of Swiss cheese (Biede and Hammond, 1979), while the acid flavour correlated positively with the levels of triand tetra-peptides and with amino acids (Biede and Hammond, 1979). It has also been hypothesised that short- and medium-chain fatty acids might contribute to the acid taste of cheese (McSweeney, 1997). Although this assumption seems reasonable for short chain acids (e.g., formic, acetic or propionic), their principal contribution to cheese flavour is to its aroma in the unionised form (RCOOH) (Le Qu~r~ et al., 1996; Salles and Le Quere, 1998; Qian and Reineccius, 2002b).
Extraction, separation, identification of sapid compounds in relation to their sensory properties The study of taste-impact compounds in cheese, or more precisely in its water-soluble fraction, involves the study of soluble low molecular weight material (i.e., small peptides, amino acids, organic acids, minerals, etc.) dispersed in a very complex mixture. As it is necessary to assess the relative sensory impact of potential taste-active compounds, a fractionation scheme suitable for subsequent sensory evaluation is needed, and non-food-grade solvents or buffers must be rejected. Commonly used procedures involve extraction of grated cheese with water, possibly completed by precipitation of caseins and large peptides at pH 4.6, leading to edible fractions with good recovery of nitrogenous compounds (Kuchroo and Fox, 1982). The fractionation scheme that follows is generally adapted from the fractionation protocol used for isolating cheese nitrogen fractions for the study of proteolysis (Fox et al., 1994; McSweeney and Fox, 1997). The following steps (Fig. 3) involve ultrafihration using membranes with 1, 3 or 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff or precipitation with 70% ethanol (Cliffe et al.,
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
497
Grated cheese Water extraction Homogenisation Centrifugation
1 Pellet
Fat
(discard)
I
Re-extract as above
Water-soluble extract (WSE) I
Insoluble
,I, < Sensory evaluation
I Ultrafiltered WSE I + evaluation sensory II
1kDa retentate .~ Sensory ..
Ultrafiltration 10 k D a - 1 kDa
Ultrafiltration 10 kDa
10kDa retentate 4
.~ sensoryevaluation
10kDa )ermeate I Ultrafiltration 1 kDa
Gel filtration (water elution)
I 1 kDa permeate I
evaluation~
I
500Da ret entate..,~.
Nanofiltration 500 Da ,~
Fractions: I II, III, IV, V .....
Nanofiltrate ,
r
S e n s o r y evaluation Figure 3 Possible fractionation schemes used to isolate and evaluate non-volatile compounds from cheese.
1993). The ultrafiltered water-soluble or 70% ethanolsoluble extracts are then subjected to gel filtration chromatography (Fig. 3). Sephadex G10 (Engels and Visser, 1994; Roudot-Algaron et al., 1994a; Engels et al., 1995; Molina et al., 1999), G15 (Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993; Warmke etal., 1996; Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a), G25 (Cliffe et al., 1993; Salles etal., 1995a), or Toyopearl HW-40S (Salles et al., 1995a, 2000; Sommerer et al., 1998a, 2001) media have been used for this purpose, using pure water (generally), 0.01 M NaC1 (Engels and Visser, 1994), or aqueous 0.5 M acetic acid (Warmke etal., 1996; Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a) as eluent. The fractions obtained by gel permeation chromatography may be evaluated sensorially (Fig. 3) after freeze-drying and re-dissolution in water, possibly with pH adjustment. Alternatively, liquid chromatographic methods involving Sep Pak C18 cartridges eluted with a stepwise water-ethanol gradient (Engels and Visser, 1994; Engels et al., 1995) or HPLC
using a water/food-grade ethanol gradient (Lee and Warthesen, 1996a,b) have been used instead of gel filtration. This fractionation scheme was developed originally in order to identify small hydrophobic peptides supposedly responsible for taste characteristics such as bitter or umami (Mojarro-Guerra et al., 1991; Cliffe et al., 1993; Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993, 1994a). A dedicated liquid chromatographic purification method has been developed to isolate and identify oligopeptides from the WSE of goat milk cheese (Sommerer et al., 1998a, 2001). Systematic sensory evaluation of the final fractions allows target fractions to be determined that possess interesting tastes, and physicochemical assessment of these key fractions should permit the identification of those compounds that are really relevant to the flavour of cheese (Engels and Visser, 1994; Salles etal., 1995a). Using this approach, some recent studies have been dedicated to the taste of the WSE of various cheeses.
498
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
Low molecular weight peptides, with two to four amino residues, were identified in Vacherin Mont d'Or (Mojarro-Guerra et al., 1991). As there was not enough natural material available for sensory evaluation, commercially available analogous synthetic peptides were used in sensory experiments. The dipeptides tested were dissolved in tap water at a rather high concentration (50 mg/100 mL) and were found to be essentially bitter. However, neither quantitative nor threshold data were estimated and the importance of these peptides for the overall taste of the cheese was only an hypothesis (Mojarro-Guerra et al., 1991). In a study on Cheddar cheese, Cliffe et al. (1993) found bitter fractions in material thought to be large hydrophobic peptides while lower molecular weight fractions with savoury notes were thought to be small, more hydrophilic peptides and amino acids. The flavour of the WSE of Comt~ cheese was the subject of substantial efforts in the early 1990s. A great variety of small peptides was identified in these extracts (Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993, 1994a,b). Some of them were found to be essentially bitter (Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993), y-glutamyl dipeptides were found to be sour (Roudot-Algaron etal., 1994a), but all the identified compounds, including non-peptide material (Roudot-Algaron et al., 1993; Salles et al., 1995a), were found at a concentration much lower than their threshold values. Although possible synergistic effects between several molecules found at concentrations below individual threshold values cannot be a priori eliminated, these observations suggest that these components alone could not affect cheese flavour (Salles et al., 1995a). Umami taste was clearly identified in a fraction and easily explained by a substantial amount of monosodium glutamate which was found at a concentration ten times above its threshold value, while the concentrations of the other amino acids were all well below their thresholds (Sales et al., 1995a). Following the same methodology, Grosch and co-workers evaluated the taste compounds of Emmental cheese (Warmke et al., 1996). The contribution of individual free fatty acids, free amino acids, minerals, biogenic amines, lactic and succinic acids, and ammonia was estimated on the basis of taste activity values (TAVs), a concept analogous to the odour activity values (OAVs), and defined as the ratio of concentration to taste threshold. From these results, acetic and propionic acids were confirmed to be important contributors to the taste of Emmental cheese. Glutamic acid was the major taste compound in the fraction containing free amino acids while all the ions investigated might be involved in the taste of Emmental, as were also biogenic amines (tyramine and histamine), ammonia, lactic and succinic acids (Warmke et al., 1996).
However, taste evaluation of mixtures of compounds conducted in tap water suggested that the characteristic taste compounds of Emmental are acetic, propionic, lactic, succinic and glutamic acids, each in the undissociated form and/or as ammonium, sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium salts, as well as chlorides and phosphates analogues (Warmke et al., 1996). A study conducted on a model based on unripened Mozzarella-type cheese confirmed the importance of acetic, propionic, lactic, succinic and glutamic acids, and sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium, phosphate and chloride ions to the taste of Emmental cheese (Preininger et al., 1996). The same approach applied to Camembert led to the conclusion that the important taste contributors for Camembert are acetic, butyric, 3-methylbutyric, caprylic and succinic acids, monosodium glutamate, ammonia and NaC1 (Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a). It was also found that the biogenic amine, cadaverine, and the rare amino acids, ornithine and citrulline, when present, are likely to contribute to the bitter taste of Camembert (Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a). The above results clearly indicated that only low molecular weight compounds found in the WSE contribute significantly to the taste of cheese, while small peptides do not seem to be key flavour compounds, as was previously hypothesised. A study on goat milk cheese led to the same conclusions (Sales and Le Quere, 1998; Salles et al., 2000; Le Quere and Sales, 2001). The taste of the various goat milk cheeses investigated was essentially due to mineral salts and lactic acid. Fractions rich in small peptides and free amino acids were found to be essentially tasteless when evaluated either in water (Sales et al., 2000) or in a model cheese (Sales and Le Quere, 1998; Le Quere and Sales, 2001). In a comparative study on cheeses made from cows', ewes' or goats' milk, Molina et al. (1999) concluded that, even though differences were found in the intensity and predominance of individual tastes in the fractions of the cheeses made from the milk of the three species, it was difficult to correlate the peptide pattern and the free amino acid content of cheese with the sensory evaluation of the fractions. However, synergistic effects on taste have been demonstrated between peptides, amino acids and mineral salts (Wang et al., 1996) and interactions between tastes in mixtures may exist (Breslin, 1996). Therefore, it appeared interesting to generalise the evaluation of model mixtures of compounds that have been identified and quantified in the WSE of cheese (Warmke et al., 1996; Kubickova and Grosch, 1998a). Moreover, fractionation of the WSE by gel filtration has two main limitations: poor resolution and the necessity of
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
tedious repetitive steps in order to obtain sufficient peptide material for sensory evaluation. To clarify the putative effect of the small water-soluble peptides on the taste of cheese, it was therefore necessary to develop a new isolation procedure. Nanofiltration using ionisable membranes with a molecular weight cut-off of 500 Da was used by Sommerer et al. (1998b). A nanofiltrate was prepared from the 1-kDa permeate obtained by ultrafiltration of the WSE (Fig. 3). A large proportion of mineral salts and a substantial proportion of amino acids were thus eliminated from the nanofiltration retentate in which the majority of small peptides were concentrated (Sommerer et al., 1998b). This relatively pure and edible peptide-containing fraction could be used in sensory analysis, after incorporation into a bland model cheese system (Salles etal., 1995b), on its own or with the addition of putative synergistic effectors such as mineral salts or amino acids (Sommerer et al., 1998b). Using omission tests (see Engel et al., 2002a,b, and references cited therein for a comprehensive review), it was shown that small peptides have no effect on the taste of goat milk cheese, and no additive or synergistic effects were found between those peptides and salts or amino acids (Sommerer et al., 1998b). This unexpected result has been confirmed after complete physicochemical assessment of the WSE from goats' milk cheese has allowed the development of a model mixture that was validated sensorially (Engel et al., 2000a). Using omission tests, the relative impact of WSE components on goat cheese taste has been determined (Engel et al., 2000b). Among the main taste characteristics of the WSE from goats' milk cheese (salty, sour and bitter), saltiness was explained by additive effects of Na +, K +, Ca 2+ and Mg 2+, sourness was due to synergism between NaC1, phosphates and lactic acid, and bitterness resulted entirely from CaCI2 and MgCI2. Amino acids, lactose and peptides had no significant impact on the taste properties of the WSE of goats' milk cheese (Engel et al., 2000b). The same procedure was applied recently to a specially selected bitter Camembert cheese (Engel et al., 2001a,b,c) and confirmed that the WSE from cheese contained taste-active compounds, the impact of which could be modulated by an effect of the cheese matrix (Engel et al., 2001a). Sourness of Camembert WSE was explained by an enhancing effect of NaC1 on the acid taste due to the concentration of H30 +, saltiness was due to NaC1 whereas bitterness was mainly due to the bitter peptides found in the fraction with a molecular weight in the range 500-1000 Da (Engel et al., 2001b). The intense proteolytic activity of the strain of Penicillium camemberti, specially selected to develop bitterness in this case, has been demonstrated to be responsible for the accumula-
499
tion of small (MW < 1000 Da) bitter peptides during ripening (Engel et al., 2001c).
Dynamic Methods for Flavour Characterisation Even if the 'best' extraction and identification methods are used, poor correlations are often found between the overall levels of flavour components (volatile and non-volatile) and sensory perception experienced by a consumer. In other words, it is not enough to know the exact composition of food in terms of flavour compounds to understand perfectly the perception of its flavour. In fact, the perception of flavour is a dynamic process (Piggott, 2000). During the consumption of food, the concentration of aroma compounds at the olfactory epithelium and of sapid compounds at the taste buds varies with time. Flavour components are released progressively from the food matrix during chewing. Kinetics of the release of flavour depends on the nature of the food matrix composition and of individual mastication pattern. Sensory methods, such as time-intensity, have been used to study the dynamicand time-related aspects of flavour perception (Piggott,
2000). Release of volatiles in vivo
Techniques which measure volatiles directly in the mouth or in the nose have been developed to obtain physico-chemical data that reflect the pattern of aroma molecules released from food and that are effectively present at the olfactory receptors during consumption (Linforth and Taylor, 1993; Taylor and Linforth, 1994). Among the various approaches aimed at sampiing aroma from the nose (nose-space), the collection of expired air samples on Tenax | traps (Fig. 4) provided the first robust results (Linforth and Taylor, 1993; Taylor and Linforth, 1994). When applied to
enaxtrap OC ' urnp, ,Ana,ys,s, Ill1, I
IS
I Sampling I
Figure 4 Collection and analysis of expired air by Tenax trapping and GC-MS (reproduced from Roberts and Taylor (2000), with permission from the American Chemical Society).
500
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
Cheddar cheese (Delahunty et al., 1994), the 'buccal headspace' method demonstrated that, despite a similar composition of volatiles found with conventional headspace analysis, some cheeses, depending on their fat content, released a different balance of volatiles during consumption (Delahunty et al., 1996a). Gas chromatography-olfactometry of buccal headspace showed a number of volatile compounds which have been suspected to contribute primarily and most likely to Cheddar cheese flavour (Delahunty et al., 1996b). It was presumed that the buccal headspace extract was representative of the aroma compounds that a consumer perceives during consumption (O'Riordan and Delahunty, 2001). By overlapping the sampling time periods, release curves can be constructed and temporal changes reflecting relative concentrations of volatiles at a particular moment during consumption can be determined (Linforth et al., 1996). When applied to Cheddar cheese, 'temporal buccal headspace' results, obtained on an accumulated 'time-concentration' basis (four time periods: 15, 30, 45 and 60 s of cheese consumption), were correlated with sensory time-intensity data (Delahunty et al., 1996c). Time-course data confirmed the results of conventional analysis while providing improved sensory predictions from the instrumental results (Delahunty et al., 1996c). Mastication behaviour using electromyography and saliva production rates of individuals have also been measured during consumption of Cheddar cheese (Delahunty et al., 1998; O'Riordan et al., 1998). Combined to nose-space analysis and sensory evaluation using free choice profiling, these authors demonstrated that although there were differences in chewing styles and saliva production rates, the assessors' individual nose-space profiles were very similar for all Cheddar cheeses examined (Delahunty et al., 1998). Partial least-squares regression analysis allowed the most important flavour differences between cheeses to be predicted from the volatiles released during consumption (O'Riordan et al., 1998). Recently, atmospheric pressure ionisation-mass spectrometry (API-MS) has been developed to monitor aroma release during chewing (Taylor et al., 2000). Air from the nose (nose-space) is sampled directly into the API-MS source through an interface (Fig. 5), making real time breath-by-breath analysis possible (Linforth etal., 1996; Taylor and Linforth, 1996). Therefore, by combining time-intensity sensory studies with nose-space analysis, it is now possible to relate temporal parameters of aroma release to perception (Linforth etal., 2000). The method, reviewed in detail in specialised treatises (Roberts and Taylor, 2000; Taylor, 2002), has been applied recently to soft French
Nitrogen 10 I/min
Cone
Venturi
I;o r
I
. ~ ~'~* ,~ :o'~ol~' I
Breathflow
~ 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7I 6Qua
I
Corona pin
Figure 5 Principle of the API-MS interface used for breath by breath analysis (reproduced from Roberts and Taylor (2000), with permission from the American Chemical Society).
cheeses (Salles etal., 2003). Three French mouldripened soft cheeses (Brie made from pasteurised milk, Camembert made from pasteurised milk and from raw milk) were evaluated by a panel of 15 assessors (Salles et al., 2003). Retronasal aroma profiles made by citation frequency of attributes revealed four main descriptors for the three cheeses. The sulphury note (cabbage/cauliflower/vegetable) was particularly intense for the Camembert cheeses, while the buttery/creamy note was important for the three cheeses studied; the mushroom attribute was less intense in the Camembert cheeses, and ammonia was perceived in all cheeses but was found particularly difficult to score by the panellists (Salles et al., 2003). Therefore, the three main aroma notes (sulphury, buttery and mushroom) were selected for subsequent time-intensity (TI) scoring (15 assessors evaluated each attribute, with three replicates of each cheese). Gas chromatography-olfactometry of the dynamic headspace sampling of the three cheeses allowed odour-active compounds to be identified, amongst which sulphur compounds (methanethiol, dimethylsulphide (DMS), S-methylthioacetate, dimethyldisulphide (DMDS), 2,4-dithiapentane, dimethyltrisulphide, 2,3,5-trithiahexane and dimethyltetrasulphide) could be related to the sulphury attribute scored by the panellists. However, API-MS nose-space experiments allowed the detection of only six compounds of which three contained sulphur ones (DMS, 5-methylthioacetate and DMDS). Simultaneous TI scoring of the sulphury note allowed a perfect superposition of the time-intensity curve with the release of the sulphur compounds (Fig. 6). The most significant perception and flavour release parameters allowed the three cheeses to be well discriminated by principal component analysis (PCA), showing a good agreement between perception scored by assessors and consistency in their release of aroma compounds while eating cheeses (Salles et al., 2003). Another PCA analysis showed a positive correlation for the sulphury note between the perception parameters derived from the TI curves and parameters derived from the aroma
Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
._z-
o
T-I
2
20
- m e *k''=L.y, thioacetate
gee/.. 0
6oot
~.. soo N "E v
DMDS
300 200
100 0 4OO
S" 300 r
DMS
250
N 2oo "~ 150 ...... 100 -50
J
~
m
/
z 62.9 j
0
|
0
1
,
2
3
4
5
Time in min
Figure 6 Flavour release from Camembert cheese for one assessor. Simultaneous time-intensity scoring of the sulphury/ cabbage attribute and API-MS analysis of S-methyl thioacetate, dimethyldisulphide (DMDS) and dimethylsulphide (DMS) in the nose-space.
release curves (Salles et al., 2003), as suggested by the characteristic curves presented in Fig. 6 for one panellist within one session. Non-volatiles in vivo
Development of methods to study flavour release has concentrated mainly on the volatile fraction, while only a limited number of studies have been devoted to the release of non-volatile compounds in the mouth. Conductivity measurements have been used to relate the release of salt during chewing to Cheddar cheese texture (Jack et al., 1995), and a similar approach with additional in-mouth measurement of pH has been used with a variety of foodstuffs, including Cheddar cheese (Davidson etal., 1998). However, in these approaches, the sensors available for in vivo measurements only give the best estimate for salt (non-specific to sodium) and acid release. Saliva sampling using cotton buds coupled to a direct liquid mass spectrometry procedure has been described to study the rate of release of sucrose (Davidson et al., 1999). Panellists were instructed to take a swab from a specific location on the tongue at different times during mastication using a cotton bud. The weight of saliva swabbed was measured and sucrose concentration was monitored using liquid-API-MS after extraction by a methanolwater solution (Davidson et al., 1999). A continuous
501
sampling technique using a motor-driven ribbon placed across the tongue while a panellist chews a food sample has also been described (Davidson et al., 2000). At the end of the eating process, the ribbon was cut into 5 cm lengths after estimation of the saliva weight adsorbed on the ribbon, each piece representing a certain time. Non-volatile components were extracted from the pieces of ribbon with a solvent and their concentration determined by direct liquid phase API- or electrospray (ES)-MS (Davidson et al., 2000). Temporal release of sucrose and glucose from biscuits, of sodium from potato crisps, of sucrose, glucose and fructose, citric and malic acids from fresh orange and finally minerals (sodium, calcium and potassium) from Cheddar cheese was monitored successfully (Davidson et al., 2000). The cotton bud technique has been applied recently to a model processed cheese in which aroma and non-volatiles compounds consistent with literature data had been incorporated (Pionnier et al., 2003). As it was demonstrated that with certain foodstuffs the increased frequency of sampling affected the chewing pattern (Davidson et al., 2000), each panellist produced only one saliva sample per mastication, at a time-consuming cost, however. Using ES-MS in negative ionisation mode, time-course release curves for minerals (sodium, calcium, magnesium and potassium), amino acids (leucine, phenylalanine, glutamic acid), organic acids (citric, lactic, propanoic and butyric) and phosphoric acid have been obtained (Pionnier et al., 2003). As a typical example, Fig. 7, shows release curves from cheese for phenylalanine, glutamic acid, leucine, phosphoric and lactic acids obtained for one assessor. The first conclusion that could be stressed from the analyses of the release curves is that individual physiological parameters (mainly mastication behaviour and salivation rate) are related more closely to the temporal release of taste compounds than to their physico-chemical properties (Pionnier et al., 2003). Model mouth systems
A number of mechanical devices which mimic in more or less detail the processes that occur in the mouth during eating 'model mouths' have been developed (Piggott, 2000 and references therein). These are often variants of dynamic headspace analysis, but their aim is to obtain time-resolved samples containing volatiles as similar as possible to those present during actual eating. The various parameters like temperature, air flow, mastication rate and addition of artificial saliva can be varied to study their effects on volatile flavour release. The main advantages of model mouths are the large quantities of food samples that can be handled, overcoming some sensitivity problems encountered
502 Cheese Flavour: InstrumentaITechniques
~06
--e-. o --
1
> 0.5
---• - - -t-
End of mastication c~ 0.4
Phenylalanine Glutamic acid Leucine Phosphoric acid -. Lactic acid
v~c~ 0.3 0.2
3
0.1
"
---
0.0 0
. 10
.
. 20
. 30
. 40
....... l .......... .
.
50
.
.
T
,
60
70
,
80
---- critical strain, the structure of the cheese is altered via the breaking of bonds between structural elements, which are stressed beyond their elastic limit. Eventually, when the stress-bearing structural casein matrix has fractured, the cheese is said to flow. At short time scales and low r, most hard cheese varieties are essentially elastic, whereas after a long time, they flow, albeit very slowly, and do not recover to their original shape on removal of the stress. Failure to appreciate this characteristic can often lead to loss of shape (e.g., manifested by bulging, inclined surfaces) during storage, distribution and retailing, especially if cheeses of different consistencies are laid haphazardly upon each other. A stress relaxation test generally entails the instantaneous application of a constant deformation or strain, e (typically 0.10-0.20), by compression of the cheese sample between two parallel plates of a texture analyser (e.g., TA HDi Texture Analyser, Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, England; Instron Universal Testing Instrument (UTM); Instron Corporation, Massachusetts, USA.). On the application of e, or increases instantaneously to oro (i.e., zero-time value) but decays exponentially with time (t) (Shama and Sherman, 1973). The resultant or-time curve is used to determine the stress relaxation time, t, which may be defined as the time required for or to decrease to a fraction of Oro, e.g., t at which or = O-o/e, where e is the base of the natural logarithm. In a variation on such a test, Emmons et al. (1980) compressed full-fat (35%) and reduced-fat (17%) Cheddar cheeses, having a common level of moisture-in-non-fat-substance, at a constant speed to a strain of 0.2 and held the strain for 1 min. They
Rheology and Texture of Cheese
0.3
-
519
Recovery after removal of stress
Sustained constant stress
0.2 s (U .,,-, 00
-----------__Z
0.1
Non-recoverable strain J I, ,/ 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Time, s
Figure 9 Creep-relaxation curve for mature Maasdammer cheese (fat, 29%, w/w, protein, 28%, w/w). A stress of 3700 Pa was applied to a cheese disc (diameter, 40 mm; height, 2.27 mm), placed between the parallel plates of a controlled strain rheometer (TA Carrri-Med csl2500) at 20 ~ and removed after 180 s. The curve is divided into regions indicating elastic, viscoelastic and viscous behaviour.
showed that the initial compression slope (or modulus of deformability), the relaxation slope and the residual force (after 1 min) were much higher for reduced-fat cheese, made from milk with or without homogenisation, than for full-fat cheese. Mechanical models of c h e e s e theology From its creep and stress-relaxation behaviour (Fig. 9), it can be inferred that cheese is a viscoelastic material. It exhibits elastic and viscous characteristics, but unlike true elastic or viscous materials, the relationship between stress and strain depends on the magnitude and the duration of the applied stress or strain. On the application of a low stress, that is sufficiently small so as not to induce permanent damage or fracturing (breaking of bonds between the structural elements) of the microstructure, for short times, cheese behaves as an elastic solid. However, a low stress applied over a relatively long time scale results in an increasing strain, a gradual failure of the structure and an eventual flow. Hence, the relationship between r (or o9 and T (or ~) is linear only at very low r and short time scales. The T at which linearity between r and 3' is lost is referred to as the critical strain (i.e., at the end of the linear viscoelastic range), which for most solidlike foods, including cheese, is relatively small, e.g., 0.02-0.05 (Walstra and van Vliet, 1982). The modelling of cheese rheology begins with simple relationships such as Hooke's Law for small displacements in the elastic region. In the region beyond the elastic limit, sometimes referred to as the elastoplastic region (i.e., where recovery following deformation is partial on removal of stress), modelling the rheology of cheese requires more complex models.
Mechanical models have been used to simulate creep and relaxation effects in materials (Rao, 1992; Tanner, 2000). The viscoelastic behaviour of cheese may be simulated by various mechanical models that contain different arrangements of dashpots (representing the fluid element) and springs (representing the elastic element) in series and/or in parallel. A simple model consisting of a spring in parallel with a dashpot is referred to variously as a Kelvin or Voigt element (Whorlow, 1992) or Kelvin-Meyer solid (Tanner, 2000) (Fig. 10). In contrast, a Maxwell element consists of a spring in series with a dashpot, which gives an exponentially decaying response to a suddenly applied constant strain (Fig. 11). Several models have been based on multiple Kelvin bodies in series, or Maxwell bodies in parallel, to simulate creep and stress relaxation, respectively, in viscoelastic solids (Whorlow, 1992); elements with a spectrum of time constants are employed in these models to approximate viscoelastic
(7
.L
Time
Figure 10 Kelvin model and its response to constant applied stress.
520
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
the force-displacement equations (Whorlow, 1992; Steffe, 1996).
Applied strain
of these models
Large strain deformation
Time Figure 11 A Maxwell model and its stress relaxation response to a constant applied strain.
behaviour (Fig. 12). Subramanian and Gunasekaran (1997b) showed that a model consisting of eight Maxwell elements could simulate the shear modulus over a wide dynamic range in low amplitude oscillation (0.1-20 Hz). Ma et al. (1996) showed that a six-element Kelvin model could simulate creep compliance in full-fat and reduced-fat Cheddar cheese. The Burgers body, which consists of a combination of Maxwell and Kelvin elements in series (Fig. 13), affords a close approximation to both the creep and stress relaxation behaviour of cheese. The mechanical representation of these models provides an intuitive guide to the nature of viscoelasticity and a simulation of rheological behaviour based on
(a)
(b)
rl Applied strain
9
89
"/-3
Figure 12 (a) Series of three Kelvin elements with a spectrum of time constants, which may be used to simulate creep and (b) A combination of Maxwell elements with a spectrum of time constants, which may be used to simulate relaxation behaviour in a viscoelastic solid.
Definitions and terminology Large strain measurement implies permanent deformation and measurement of non-linear rheological characteristics which are related to deformation of the microstructure. In contrast to linear viscocelastic deformation where applied strains are generally > 1). Consideration of the forces that are applied to cheese from manufacture to consumption, indicates a very broad range of deformation. In some situations, the strains are of a relatively low magnitude and do not result in visible damage (e.g., during ripening, transport, retailing), while in others the strain results in fracture (e.g., during portioning) or complete disintegration of the cheese mass (e.g., comminution, as in shredding, grating, grinding, as for example in the preparation of cheese ingredients and in the manufacture of processed cheese products and cheese powders). Hence, in the current context, large strain deformation is arbitrarily subdivided into two regions, i.e., large strain deformation-elastoplastic (LSD-E; e.g., strains ---0.1-0.5; Fig. 14), where deformation does not result in fracture and the structure can partially recover, and large strain deformation-fracture (LSD-F; 0.3-0.9), where the cheese mass undergoes fracture or disintegrates and cannot recover. In the following discussion, the LSD-E and LSD-F regions will be treated jointly (Fig. 14). Measurement using texture analyser Large strain deformation testing of cheese usually involves the application of strains (e.g., ~ "-- 0.8) that result in fracture, by compression of the cheese sample
I Typical linear ] visco-elastic limit j I I
j_ Applied strain
I
( Typical extentof "~ |compression to which | I cheese is subjected in| | chewing and in | (poiitTypical fracture I L compression testing ) '
Time
0
0.40
0.80 Strain, A U L
Figure 13 Burgers four element model, which simulates creep and relaxation behaviour of cheese.
o
Figure 14 Range of strain in compression tests on cheese.
1.0
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
between two parallel plates of a texture analyser (Culioli and Sherman, 1976; Dickinson and Goulding, 1980; Creamer and Olson, 1982; Tunick et al., 1991; Guinee et al., 1996; Fenelon and Guinee, 2000; Truong et al., 2002). The cheese sample is placed on a base plate and is compressed at a fixed rate (typically 20 mm/min -1) to a pre-determined level (e.g., 75% of its original height) by the mobile plate (cross-head). However, the rate of compression used in various studies has differed widely, e.g., 5-500 mm/min -1 (Table 3). The force (F) developed during compression is recorded as a function of distance (or displacement); alternatively, the force may be converted to o-and the displacement to g. The resultant o-versus g curves for a range of hard rennet-curd cheeses (Fig. 15) typically show a number of distinct regions and enable the determination of a number of rheological parameters: 9 A-B; or increases proportionally with ~. The slope of this linear region defines the compression modulus, E (i.e., E = o-/~), which is of little practical significance in relation to cheese behaviour during processing or consumption, where strains are > >0.05. However, in the commercial grading of cheese, E may be an indication of springiness (e.g., where a grader sensorically monitors the resistance to small deformation, as in pressing the thumb into the outside of the cheese block; the force applied during this hand deformation is typically 18 N or o---- 40 kPa). 9 B-C, o-increases less than proportionally with ~. The slightly lower slope of the curve in this region compared to that in A-B is probably due to the formation of microcracks that do not spread throughout the sample but which allow some stress to be dissipated; 9 C-D, the slope of the o-/~ curve decreases markedly. The cheese begins to fracture at C, as cracks grow and spread throughout the entire sample at an increasing rate. Eventually, at D the rate of collapse of the stress-bearing para-casein matrix overtakes the build-up of o-within the matrix through further compression and a peak or, denoted as the fracture stress, is reached. The fracture stress, o-f, and strain, ~f, are measures of the stress and strain, respectively, required to cause complete fracture of the sample. Strength, or fracturability, is defined as the stress required to fracture the sample (at D), while toughness, or fracture work, is defined as the area under the curve up to the point of fracture. 9 D-E, o- decreases with further compression due to the collapse of the stress-bearing structure. The decrease in o-may be attributable to: (i) shattering of the samples into pieces that spread over the base plate, resulting in an increased surface area and (ii) the probable loss of contact between some
521
of the pieces of cheese and the base plate which results in dissipation of stress energy stored within the individual pieces. E-E cr increases as the cross-head begins to compress the fragmented pieces of cheese. The o- at the end of the compression (point F) is a measure of firmness, as judged in the first bite of mastication (Sherman, 1969; van Vliet, 1991a). The various quantities obtained from the o - ~ curve and their interpretation are given in Table 2. The application of a strain to a segment of cheese (e.g., cube or cylinder) and monitoring the resultant cr by a texture analyser, as above, is a typical method for measuring the large strain deformation behaviour of cheese. However, many variations of both the procedure of stress or strain application, and the levels, are possible. A so-called apparent elastic modulus can be calculated at a strain well below the fracture point, e.g., ~ --- 0.1, as the ratio between or and ~. A preferred term for this parameter is modulus of deformability, as the deformation in question may include some plastic flow (Ak and Gunasekaran, 1995; Johnston, 2000). However, such a parameter needs to be interpreted with caution as some apparent initial deformation may occur before complete contact is made between the compression plate and the sample surface, an occurrence that could lead to erroneous values. Fracture and work of fracture. Rheological behaviour over such a range of ~ in the form of shear or compression, can be explored in several ways, such as applying a gradually increasing ~, a fixed ~, a defined o followed by its removal, a gradually increasing ~ up to a point followed by its reversal. Stress-strain cycles, often referred to as bites (analogous to compression between the molar teeth during mastication), may be repeated at interval(s) or applied in a given sequence (e.g., pre-test compression). Depending on the level of applied strain, cheese exhibits a combination of rheological behaviours, such as non-linear elastic (e.g., region B-C, Fig. 15), sometimes referred to as viscoelastic, or inelastic (e.g., region D-E, Fig. 15), sometimes referred to as plastic behaviour.
Rheological Measurements in Cheese: Sensoric Methods The methods used to assess the rheological characteristics of cheese may be broadly classified as sensoric or instrumental, where instrumental methods can be categorised further as empirical or fundamental. The aim of sensoric methods, which are performed routinely by cheese graders, is to acquire an impression
(1) (n (D (D cO O O (n (n ~D O_
E O o x
N
O
O o or)
522
v
I
E
E E
(D (D X:
O
~
~
0~
O
~_(.9 -~
o
O
x~ 0
c
b- O ~U9 Cq ',--
"0
~-
~ o ~
N'" ~
~
I/9
I-
~
O
I--_ D < O
~
oob.:
~
030~
~-.
-.e- -.eO O r r
(D
> _c:
(D O
I
-.e- -.e- x -.e- -eO O O ~ ~ ~9 ",-- ',-- ',--
I'.-. o4 ,-. O
_
-e--e--eb - O ',-~ ',-- Cq
~ e0
O d z N _
O
~O
C7 ~ O >
----"
rrm
rex: 5
0.1), especially >el, the distribution of stress and strain within the sample depends on sample dimensions, as the sample may be deformed into an irregular shape, due to fracturing, barreling and squeezing. Squeezing flow is an intrinsic aspect of large strain uniaxial compression of cheese, i.e., as sample height is reduced, the cheese spreads in a lateral direction (Fig. 24). This implies that shearing takes place within the sample and that frictional shear forces occur at the points of contact between the sample and the compression plates. Friction can be reduced by lubrication of the contact surfaces with mineral oil or grease; in contrast, surface friction can be increased by the use of emery paper, or the surfaces can be bonded using glue, both of which eliminate slippage as a result of cheese 'sweating'. Because lubrication allows lateral movement at the contact surfaces during compression, the sample shows a slight tendency towards an hour-glass shape, as opposed to the relatively large barreling effect. Lubrication can reduce the stresses in squeezing flow by as much as 50% and increase the observed ef from - 0 . 4 5 to 0.55, in the case of Gouda cheese at 20 ~ with an aspect ratio (i.e., height/width) of unity and a cross-head speed of 500 mm/min (Culioli and Sherman, 1976). However, the frictional effect increases with cross-head speed. At a low cross-head speed (5 mm/min), lubrication decreased of b y - 2 0 % in Cheddar cheese where the aspect ratio was 0.35, with the effect becoming more pronounced (of the order of 20-30%) at e > ef (Casiraghi et al., 1985). In contrast, the bonding of the cheese surfaces to the compression plates (e.g., using cyanoacrylate ester adhesive) had relatively little effect on of, ef and O'max. A similar trend was found for Mozzarella and processed cheese spread (Casiraghi et al., 1985). At low compression plate speeds ( < 2 0 mm/min), friction had only a negligible effect in Gruyere and processed Mozzarella cheese with aspect ratios near unity (Charalambides et al., 2001). However, at aspect ratios 0.1; cf. Fig. 9).
Effect of Sample Temperature on Large Strain Deformation Characteristics in Cheese Early research showed that increasing the temperature of Gouda cheese in the range 10-20 ~ reduced the value of el, o-f and O'max, as measured by compression to 80% using the Instron UTM (Culioli and Sherman, 1976). While o'f in Cheshire and Leicester cheeses decreased exponentially as the temperature was increased from 0 to 40 ~ the effect on fracture strain depended on the type of cheese; fracture strain for Cheshire cheese increased by ---2 over the range of temperature, while fracture strain for Leicester cheese was not affected by temperature (Dickinson and Goulding, 1980). Molander et al. (1990) reported a similar trend for o-f and O'max in 4-week-old Brie between 5 and 20 ~ however, in contrast to the results of Culioli and Sherman (1976), ef increased slightly on raising the temperature. The discrepancy between the latter studies in relation to strain may be attributable to differences in the degree of fat coalescence, proteolysis and therefore fat separation and slippage. On heating cheese to a temperature (30-60 ~ greater than those (e.g., 4-25 ~ normally associated with retailing, domestic refrigeration and consumption, compression results in squeezing flow behaviour (Ak and Gunasekaran, 1995), i.e., stress increases with strain as the cheese is squeezed between the plates and no fracture point is observed. The deformability modulus (initial slope of the stress-strain curve) showed an Arrhenius type of characteristic, decreasing exponentially with temperature from 18 kPa at 30 ~ to 3 kPa at 60 ~ Such a trend is expected, as milkfat is essentially fully liquid at 30 ~ (Norris et al., 1973). Indeed, heating cheese to 60 ~ in the absence of an applied stress generally results in flow of the part-molten cheese mass to an extent dependent on cheese type and heating time.
Techniques for Measurement of Viscosity In some situations, cheese products may occur in 'liquid' form, either in the course of processing or in their usage. Typical examples are processed cheese, cheese dips and cheese sauces. The viscosity of these products may be measured by a number of instruments, e.g., the
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Bostwick consistometer, which has been used to give an empirical measurement of viscosity of a soft processed cheese spread (Rosenthal, 1999). In the latter instrument, a sample of the material being tested is placed in a cell and released by opening a simple guillotine slide gate, allowing the product to flow horizontally across a scale marked in centimeters. The length of flow in a given time period (usually 30 s), known as the Bostwick number, is taken as a measure of viscosity. Alternatively, viscosity can be measured under defined shear or low amplitude stress or strain in a rheometer, using different geometries such as concentric cylinders, a cone and plate, or parallel plates. Online measurements of viscosity of cheese products may be important, e.g., as an early measure of indicating the susceptibility of a formulation to 'creaming' (see 'Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products', Volume 2). A range of commercial on-line viscometers are available for measuring viscosity in a continuous flow situation.
Terminology Applied to Cheese Texture Cheese texture may be defined as a composite sensory attribute resulting from a combination of physical properties that are perceived by the senses of touch (including kinaesthesis and mouth-feel), sight and hearing (Brennan, 1988). Thus, cheese texture is directly measurable only by sensory analysis. Sensory analysis requires definition and classification of textural attributes or descriptors. Descriptors applied to cheese texture have been grouped into mechanical, geometrical and other characteristics (Fig. 31). The mechanical characteristics are sensed as forces on the teeth, tongue and the mouth
generally during eating, and by hearing in the case of fracture, whereas geometrical characteristics are mostly sensed visually but may also be partly sensed by touch. The other characteristics are 'mouth-feel' qualities, described subjectively by terms such as hard, soft, firm, springy, crumbly, adhesive, moist or dry. These terms are thought to have significance in relation to consumer appeal and satisfaction (Szczesniak, 1963a). The mechanical characteristics, in turn, have been divided into five primary parameters and three secondary parameters (Table 5, Fig. 31). The secondary parameters are considered to be composed of various intensities of hardness and cohesiveness. The geometrical parameters are divided into two classes, i.e., those related to particle size and hardness, and those related to particle shape and orientation. Experience shows that panelists found hardness relatively easy to sense but that adhesiveness was much more difficult to judge (Halmos, 2000). Sensory texture terms, as distinct from rheological terms, have linguistic boundaries, i.e., they are susceptible to different interpretation in different languages (Lawless et al., 1997; Bourne, 2002). Some texturerelated characteristics can be measured by machines and these are not bound by language. These characteristics include hardness, cohesiveness, adhesiveness, elasticity, viscosity, brittleness, chewiness and gumminess, definitions for which are given in Table 5. The measurements give objective quantifiable data, provided the measurement conditions are well defined. Relationships between cheese texture and rheology
The Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) method, involving instrumental measurement using double bite compression, was developed to imitate the compressing action 9 visual appearance 9 sampling and slicingcharacteristics 9 spreading, creaming characteristics, pourability
Initial perception { (before placing in mouth)
9 analyticalcharacteristics
9 particle size, shape and size distribution 9 oil content; size, shape and size distribution of oil
Primary characteristics Initial perception on palate
particles 9 elasticity, cohesion 9 viscosity 9 adhesion (to palate)
l Secondary characteristics I
Mastication (high shearing
9 9 9 9 9
I Ze.iar characteristics
stress) Residual
masticatory impression
Figure 31
f
533
9
hard, soft brittle, plastic, crisp, rubbery, spongy smooth, coarse, powdery, lumpy, pasty creamy, watery, soggy sticky, tacky
9 greasy, gummy, stringy 9 melt down properties on palate
Classificationof food texture into primary, secondary or tertiary characteristics, based on Sherman (1969).
534
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Table 5
Classification of the mechanical characteristics of cheese into primary and secondary parameters a
Primary parameters
Secondary parameters
Hardness - the force necessary to attain a given deformation Cohesiveness - strength of internal bonds making up the body of the product Elasticity- the rate at which a deformed material returns to its original form after the deforming force is removed Viscosity- rate of flow per unit force Adhesiveness - the work necessary to overcome the attractive forces between the surface of a food and surface of other materials with which it comes in contact, e.g., the teeth, palate and tongue
Brittleness - the force at which the material fractures Chewiness - the energy required to masticate a solid food, e.g., some cheeses such as Mozzarella, to a state ready for swallowing Guminess - the energy required to disintegrate a semi-solid food, e.g., some cheeses such as ripe Camembert, to a state ready for swallowing
a Modified from Szczesniak (1963a), Bourne (1978).
of molar teeth while masticating food in the mouth (Szczesniak, 1963a; Peleg, 1976; Bourne, 1978). Classification of the mechanical attributes of cheese texture, as described above, was designed with the aim of integrating sensory data for foods evaluated by trained panels, with texture-profile data obtained on the same foods using compression testing. For this purpose, objective rheological parameters, some of which correspond in name to the sensory-determined parameters, were defined (Table 5) and are known as TPA parameters (see 'Texture profile analysis'). While this classification system has been modified, the textural descriptors and their interpretation as devised by this classification scheme (Table 5) are still widely used in textural evaluation of food (Brennan, 1988; Drake et aI., 1999). Sherman (1969) proposed an alternative classification of food texture (Fig. 31). The characteristics contributing to the texture of cheese, and other foods, during eating have been classified as primary, secondary (e.g., adhesiveness) or tertiary (e.g., firmness) (Fig. 31). The primary characteristics, from which all others are derived, include the food's composition, its micro- and macro-structure, and its molecular properties. The secondary and tertiary categories of textural properties include many characteristics which are directly related to the rheological properties as it is subjected to various stresses and strains during eating, e.g., hardness, brittleness and adhesiveness (Sherman, 1969). According to this classification, the secondary characteristics are associated with initial perception in the mouth, i.e., upon contact with tongue, palate and teeth prior to mastication. Sherman (1969) claimed that the main characteristics sensed at this stage are elasticity (E), viscosity (r/) and adhesion to the palate, where elasticity is understood as the tendency to recover its shape after removal of the stress. Two of those characteristics, namely elasticity and viscosity, can together be represented by the Burgers mechanical model (see 'Cheese texture').
Texture profile analysis (TPA)
A system of rheological parameters (e.g., firmness, elasticity) related to texture and known as TPA was developed (Fig. 32; Table 6; Friedman et al., 1963). The rheological measurements were originally carried out using the General Foods Texturometer (see 'Imitative tests'), using double-bite compression (Bourne, 1978). Texture profile analysis parameters were later calculated from measurements using uniaxial doublebite compression at constant speed, using texture analysers including the Instron UTM (Breene, 1975; Bourne, 1978; Lee etal., 1978) and the texture analyser (TA series from Stable Micro Systems) (Halmos, 1997; Meullenet and Gross, 1999). Use of TPA to evaluate cheese texture
Szczesniak (1963b) found a curvilinear relationship between TPA hardness and an organoleptic rating of hardness. Casiraghi et al. (1989), working with five different Italian cheese varieties, including Grana Padano and Italico, showed that sensory hardness was highly correlated with instrumental hardness.
1st compression stroke
1
2nd compression stroke
b
0
Time
Figure 32
Typical stress trend during a double-bite compression test, from which TPA parameters are calculated (see Table 5).
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Table 6
535
Texture profile analysis (TPA) parameters and physical definitions a
Terminologyb
Physical definition (TPA term)
Units
Fracturability Firmness Springiness (or elasticity) Cohesiveness Gumminess Chewiness Adhesiveness
Stress (or sometimes, force) to fracture point, H1 (Fig. 32) Stress (or sometimes, force) at a given deformation Percentage of deformation which is recovered between the first and second bites
Pa, kPa Pa or kPa
Area of second bite over area of the first bite (A2/A1) in Fig. 32 Hardness • Cohesiveness Hardness • Cohesiveness x Springiness Work necessary to pull the plunger (or compression plate) away from the sample (Area 3 in Fig. 32)
m
Pa, kPa Pa, kPa J/m3
a Sources: Bourne (1978), van Vliet (1991a), Szczesniak (1963a), Yang and Taranto (1982). b Fracturability was originally known as brittleness (Bourne, 1978), and firmness as hardness (Szczesniak, 1963a).
Green et al. (1985) found significant correlations between five sensory attributes (firmness, springiness, crumbliness, graininess and stickiness) and instrumental parameters (of and ef ). Hennequin and Hardy (1993) reported that TPA-hardness, i.e., force at 70% compression, also had a high correlation with sensory hardness (r = 0.78, n = 19, P < 0.001) for four soft cheeses. Halmos (2000) compared sensory and instrumental measurements of hardness, cohesiveness and adhesiveness of six cheeses with a wide range of texture (including Havarti, Swiss and Romano). The sensory measurements increased with the corresponding instrumental readings, apart from one parameter for Romano cheese, for which the cohesiveness as measured instrumentally was ranked higher than the corresponding sensory measurement. The significant correlations, which were characteristic of the overall study, confirm the value of objective measurements in support of sensory measurements. However, the deviation in the trend for the Romano cheese highlights the complexity of textural (i.e., tactile sensory) characteristics as compared with instrumental measurements. Antoniou et al. (2000) performed sensory and TPA analyses on 15 French cheeses (Munster, Emmental, Roquefort, Beaufort, Camembert, Reblochon, Pont l'Eveque, Brie de Meaus, Tomme de Savoie, Valencay, St Nectaire, Pyrenees Brebis, Blue d'Auvergne, Comte Vieux and Fourme de Salers). The cheeses fell into three compositional groups on the basis of moisture (means 34, 45 and 51%, w/w). This grouping carried through to the results of mechanical and sensory analysis. The mechanical (TPA) terms which were most significant in differentiating the groups were: force at 10% deformation, relaxation force (after holding sample for - 1 2 s at 10% compression), force at 80% deformation (hardness), fracture force and adhesiveness. The most significant sensory terms were: hardness, fracturability and chewiness. Some of the mechanical parameters were highly correlated with
each other (e.g., force at 10% deformation, fracture force and hardness). Likewise, some of the sensory parameters were inter-correlated, e.g., hardness with adhesiveness. In agreement with previous studies (Green et al., 1985; Casiraghi et al., 1989; Hennequin and Hardy, 1993; Halmos, 2000), sensory parameters were highly correlated with mechanical parameters, e.g., mechanical hardness with sensory hardness. It is noteworthy that the 10% compression measurements (a level of deformation that is mostly recoverable) predicted cheese texture (i.e., as judged in sensory terms) better than the 80% compression tests. Despite the significant correlations between some sensory textural parameters and rheological measurements, instrumental analysis of texture, e.g., using texture analysers, is not considered a complete substitute for sensory evaluation (see Halmos, 2000), because of several factors: complexity of mastication, differences between individuals in the perception of texture, effect of time of day upon perception of texture, and others. While instrumental methods alone cannot be relied upon to determine consumer acceptance, their value resides in their ability consistently to enable small changes in physical characteristics, which contribute to texture, to be quantified. Use of instrumental shear deformation to evaluate cheese texture
Three techniques for large strain shear deformation testing have been described (see 'Large strain shear measurements'). Truong et al. (2002) compared instrumental textural measurements on Cheddar cheese, as obtained using vane rheometry (shear), uniaxial compression (single bite) or TPA (double bite), with the corresponding sensory texture measurements. Instrumental texture maps of ten commercial Cheddar cheeses, generated by the vane method and by compression testing, clearly separated the cheeses and showed similar distribution patterns. Highly significant
536
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
correlations were found between vane parameters and TPA parameters (i.e., by uniaxial compression), and between TPA parameters and sensory texture parameters (by mouth). Correlations between vane parameters and sensory parameters were significant, but not as highly significant as between sensory and TPA parameters. The higher correlation between sensory texture and TPA texture could be due to the fact that TPA parameters were developed in conjunction with compression (i.e., General Foods Texturometer), while no corresponding texture-related parameters have been developed for torsional techniques, such as the vane method.
Conclusions The rheological properties of cheese have a large influence on its texture and behaviour during size reduction, and hence, its suitability as an ingredient (see 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). Many factors influence the rheological properties, including m a n u facturing procedure, variety, composition and biochemical changes during ripening. The latter parameters have a major influence on the degree of hydration, or aggregation, of the para-casein matrix, which is the major structural element controlling deformation on the application of a stress. Many m e t h o d s are available for measuring the theological properties of cheese; some measure within the linear viscoelastic range to yield precise rheological quantities. In contrast, rheological m e a s u r e m e n t s made u n d e r large strain or stress yield quantities which are more empirical in nature, but which are typically related to the stresses and strains experienced during c o n s u m p t i o n and size reduction.
References Ak, M.M. and Gunasekaran, S. (1992). Stress-strain curve analysis of Cheddar cheese under uniaxial compression. J. Food Sci. 57, 1078-1081. Ak, M.M. and Gunasekaran, S. (1995). Evaluating theological properties of Mozzarella cheese by the squeezing flow method. J. Text. Stud. 26, 695-711. Antoniou, K.D., Petridis, D., Raphaelides, S., Ben Omar, Z. and Kesteloot, R. (2000). Texture assessment of French cheeses. J. Food Sci. 65, 168-172. Bagley, E.B. and Christianson, D.D. (1987). Measurement and interpretation of rheological properties of food. Food Technol. 41, 96-99. Beal, P. and Mittal, G.S. (2000). Vibration and compression responses of Cheddar cheese at different fat content and age. Milchwissenschaft 55,139-142. Bourne, M.C. (1978). Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 32, 62-66, 72.
Bourne, M.C. (2002). Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd edn, Academic Press, San Diego. Bowland, E.L. and Foegeding, E.A. (1999). Factors determining large-strain (fracture) rheological properties of model processes cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 1851-1859. Breene, W.M. (1975). Application of texture profile analysis to instrumental food texture evaluation. J. Text. Stud. 6, 53-82. Brennan, J.G. (1984). Some experience with the Stevens compression response analyses applied to food texture measurement. IFST Proc. 17, 219-231. Brennan, J.G. (1988). Texture perception and measurement, in, Sensory Analysis of Foods, 2nd edn, Piggott, J.R., ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 69-101. Breuil, P. and Meullenet, J.E (2001). A comparison of three instrumental tests for predicting sensory texture profiles of cheese. J. Text. Stud. 32, 41-45. Bryant, A., Ustanol, Z. and Steffe, J. (1995). Texture of Cheddar cheese as influenced by fat reduction. J. Food Sci. 60, 1216-1219. Calzada, J.E and Peleg, M. (1978). Mechanical interpretation of compressive stress-strain relationships of solid foods. J. Food Sci. 43, 1087-1092. Casiraghi, E.M., Bagley, E.B. and Christianson, D.D. (1985). Behaviour of Mozzarella, Cheddar and processed cheese spread in lubricated and bonded compression. J. Text. Stud. 16, 281-301. Casiraghi, E., Lucisano, M. and Pompei, C. (1989). Correlation among instrumental texture, sensory texture and chemical composition of five Italian cheeses. Ital. J. Food Sci. 1, 53-63. Charalambides, M.N., Goh, S.M., Lim, S.L. and Williams, J.G. (2001). The analysis of the frictional effect on stressstrain data from uniaxial compression of cheese. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 2313-2321. Collyer, A.A. and Clegg, D.W. (1998). Rheological Measurement, 2nd edn, Chapman & Hall, London. Creamer, L.K. and Olson, N.E (1982). Rheological evaluation of maturing Cheddar cheese. J. Food Sci. 47, 631-646. Culioli, J. and Sherman, P. (1976). Evaluation of Gouda cheese firmness by compression tests. J. Text. Stud. 7, 353-372. de Jong, L. (1978). Protein breakdown in soft cheese and its relation to consistency. 3. The micellar structure of Meshanger cheese. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 32, 15-25. Desai, N. and Nolting, J. (1995). Microstructure studies of reduced fat cheeses containing fat substitute, in, Chemistry of Structure-Function Relationships in Cheese, Malin, E.L. and Tunick, M.H., eds, Plenum Press, New York. pp. 295-302. Dickinson, E. and Goulding, I.C. (1980). Yield behaviour of crumbly English cheeses in compression. J. Text. Stud. 11, 51-63. Drake, M.A., Gerard, ED., Truong, V.D. and Daubert, C.R. (1999). Relationship between instrumental and sensory measurements of cheese texture. J. Text. Stud. 30, 451-476.
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Eberhard, P. (1985). Rheologische Eigenschaften ausgew/~hlter Kasesorten. 1. Emmentalerk/~se. Schweiz. Milchw. Forschung 14 (4), 3-9. Emmons, D.B., Kalab, M., Larmond, E. and Lowrie, R.J. (1980). Milk gel structure. X. Texture and microstructure in Cheddar cheese made from whole milk and from homogenized low-fat milk.J. Text. Stud. 11, 15-34. Everett, D.W., Ding, K., Olson, N.E and Gunasekaran, S. (1995). Applications of confocal microscopy to fat globule structure in cheese, in, Chemistry of Structure-Function Relationships in Cheese, Malin, E.L. and Tunick, M.H., eds, Plenum Press, New York. pp. 321-330. Fenelon, M.A. and Guinee, T.P. (2000). Primary proteolysis and textural changes during ripening in Cheddar cheeses manufactured to different fat contents. Int. Dairy J. 10, 277-288. Fox, RE, O'Connor, T.P., McSweeney, P.L.H., Guinee, T.P. and O'Brien, N.M. (1996). Cheese: physical, biochemical, and nutritional aspects. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 39, 163-328. Fox, RE, Guinee, T.P., Cogan, T.M. and McSweeney, P.L.H. (2000). Fundamentals of Cheese Science. Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. Friedman, H.H., Whitney, J.E. and Szczesniak, A.S. (1963). The Texturometer- a new instrument for objective texture measurement. J. Food Sci. 28,390-396. Green, M.L. (1990a). The cheesemaking potential of milk concentrated up to four-fold by ultrafihration and heated in the range 90-97 ~ J. Dairy Res. 57, 549-557. Green, M.L. (1990b). Cheddar cheesemaking from whole milk concentrated by ultrafiltration and heated to 90 ~ J. Dairy Res. 57,559-569. Green, M.L., Glover, EA., Scurlock, E.M.W., Marshall, R.J. and Hatfield, D.S. (1981a). Development of structure and texture in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Res. 48,333-341. Green, M.L., Turvey, A. and Hobbs, D.G. (1981b). Development of structure and texture in Cheddar cheese, d. Dairy Res. 48, 343-355. Green, M.L., Marshall, R.J. and Glover, EA. (1983). Influence of homogenization of concentrated milks on the structure and properties of rennet curds. J. Dairy Res. 50, 341-348. Green, M.L., Marshall, R.J. and Brooker, B.E. (1985). Instrumental and textural assessment and fracture mechanisation of Cheddar and Cheshire cheese. J. Text. Stud. 16, 351-361. Green, M.L., Langley, K.R., Marshall, R.J., Brooker, B.E., Willis, A. and Vincent, J.EV. (1986). Mechanical properties of cheese, cheese analogues and protein gels. Food Microstruct. 5,169-180. Guinee, T.P. (2002). The functionality of cheese as an ingredient: a review. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 57, 79-91. Guinee, T.P. (2003). Role of protein in cheese and cheese products, in, Advanced Dairy Chemistry, 3rd edn, Vol. 1 Proteins, Fox, RE and McSweeney, P.L.H., eds, Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York. pp. 1083-1174. Guinee, T.P. and Law, B.A. (2001). Role of milk fat in hard and semihard cheeses, in, Fats in Food Technology, Rajah, K.K., ed., Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK. pp. 275-331.
537
Guinee, T.P., O'Callaghan, DJ., Mulholland E.O. and Harrington, D. (1996). Milk protein standardization by uhrafiltration for Cheddar cheese manufacture. J. Dairy Res. 63,281-293. Guinee, T.P., Fenelon, M.A., Mulholland, E.O., Kennedy, B.T., O'Brien, N. and Reville, W.J. (1998). The influence of milk pasteurization temperature and pH at curd milling on the composition, texture and maturation of reduced fat Cheddar cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 51, 1-90. Guinee, T.P., Auty, M.A.E. and Mullins, C. (1999). Observations on the microstructure and heat-induced changes in the viscoelasticity of commercial cheeses. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 54, 84-89. Guinee, T.P., Auty, M.A.E., Mullins, C., Corcoran, M.O. and Mulholland, E.O. (2000a). Preliminary observations on effects of fat content and degree of fat emulsification on the structure-functional relationship of Cheddar-type cheese. J. Text. Stud. 31,645-663. Guinee, T.P., Auty, M.A.E. and Fenelon, M.A. (2000b). The effect of fat content on the rheology, microstructure and heat-induced functional characteristics of Cheddar cheese. Int. Dairy J. 10, 277-288. Guinee, T.P., Feeney, E.P., Auty, M.A.A. and Fox, RE (2002). Effect of pH on calcium concentration on some textural and functional properties of Mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 1655-1669. Hall, D.M. and Creamer, L.K. (1972). A study of the submicroscopic structure of Cheddar, Cheshire and Gouda cheese by electron microscopy. NZ J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 7, 95-102. Halmos, A.L. (1997). Food texture and sensory properties of dairy ingredients. Food Aust. 49, 169-173. Halmos, A.L. (2000). Relationships between instrumental texture measurements and sensory attributes, in, Hydrocolloids - Part 2, Nishinari, K., ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 431-444. Hennequin, D. and Hardy, J. (1993). Evaluation instrumentale et sensorielle de certaines proprietes texturales de fromage/t pate molle. Int. Dairy J. 3,635-647. Home, D.S., Banks, J.M., Leaver, J. and Law, A.J.R. (1994). Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of Cheddar cheese, in, Cheese Yield and Factors Affecting its Control. Special Issue No. 9402. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 507-512. Hort, J. and LeGrys, G. (2000). Rheological models of Cheddar cheese texture and their application to maturation. J. Text. Stud. 31, 1-24. Hwang, C.H. and Gunasekaran, S. (2001). Measuring crumbliness of some commercial Queso Fresco-type Latin American cheeses. Milchwissenschaft 56,446-450. Imoto, E.M., Lee, C.-H. and Rha, C. (1979). Effect of compression ratio on the mechanical properties of cheese. J. Food Sci. 44,343-345. Innocente, N., Pittia, R, Stefanuto, O. and Corradini, C. (2002). Correlation among instrumental texture, chemical composition and presence of characteristic holes in a semi-hard Italian cheese. Milchwissenschaft 57, 204-208.
538
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Johnston, D.E. (2000). The effects of freezing at high pressure on the rheology of Cheddar and Mozzarella cheeses. Milchwissenschaft 55,559-562. Johnston, D.E., O'Hagan, M. and Balmer, D.W. (2002). Effects of high pressure treatment on the texture and cooking performance of half-fat Cheddar cheese. Milchwissenschaft 57, 198-201. Kalab, M. (1977). Milk gel structure. VI. Cheese texture and microstructure. MilchwissenschaJt 32,449-457. Kalab, M. (1979). Microstructure of dairy foods. 1. Milk products based on protein. J. Dairy Sci. 62, 1352-1364. Kalab, M. and Harwalkar, V.R. (1974). Milk gel structure. II. Relation between firmness and ultrastructure of heatinduced skim-milk gels containing 40-60% total solids. J. Dairy Res. 41,131-135. Kiely, L.J., Kindstedt, P.S., Hendricks, G.M., Levis, J.E., Yun, J.J. and Barbano, D.M. (1992). Effect of pH on the development of curd structure during the manufacture of Mozzarella cheese. Food Struct. 11, 217-224. Kiely, L.J., Kindstedt, P.S., Hendricks, G.M., Levis, J.E., Yun, J.J. and Barbano, D.M. (1993). Age related changes in the microstructure of Mozzarella cheese. Food Struct. 12, 13-20. Kimber, A.M., Brooker, B.E., Hobbs, D.G. and Prentice, J.H. (1974). Electron microscope studies of the development of structure in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Res. 41,389-396. Laloy, E., Vuillemard, J.C., E1 Soda, M. and Simard, R.E. (1996). Influence of the fat content of Cheddar cheese on retention and localization of starters. Int. Dairy J. 6, 729-740. Lawless, H., Vanne, M. and Tuorila, H. (1997). Categorization of English and Finnish texture terms among consumers and food professionals. J. Text. Stud. 28, 687-708. Lee, C.-H., Imoto, E.M. and Rha, C. (1978). Evaluation of cheese texture. J. Food Sci. 43, 1600-1605. Lobato-Calleros, C., Vernon-Carter, E.J., Guerrero-Legarreta, I., Soriano-Santos, J. and Escalona-Beundia, H. (1997). Use of fat blends in cheese analogs: influence on sensory and instrumental textural characteristics. J. Text. Stud. 28, 619-632. Lowrie, R.J., Kalab, M. and Nichols, D. (1982). Curd granule and milled curd junction patterns in Cheddar cheese made by traditional and mechanized processes. J. Dairy Sci. 65, 1122-1129. Luyten, T., van Vliet, T. and Walstra, P. (1991a). Characterization of the consistency of Gouda cheese: rheological properties. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 45, 33-53. Luyten, T., van Vliet, T. and Walstra, P. (1991b). Characterization of the consistency of Gouda cheese: fracture properties. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 45, 55-80. Ma, L., Drake, M.A., Barbosa-Canovas, G.V. and Swanson, B.G. (1996). Viscoelastic properties of reduced-fat and full-fat Cheddar cheeses. J. Food Sci. 61,821-823. Madsen, J.S. and Ardb, Y. (2001). Exploratory study of proteolysis, rheology and sensory properties of Danbo cheese with different fat contents. Int. Dairy J. 11,423-431. Marshall, R.J. (1990). Composition, structure, rheological properties and sensory texture of processed cheese analogues. J. Sci. Food Agric. 50,237-252. Meullenet, J.EC. and Gross, L. (1999). Instrumental single and double compression tests to predict sensory texture characteristics of foods. J. Text. Stud. 30, 167-180.
Mistry, VV. and Anderson, D.L. (1993). Composition and microstructure of commercial full-fat and low-fat cheeses. Food Struct. 12,259-266. Molander, E., Kristiansen, K.R. and Werner, H. (1990). Instrumental and sensoric measurement of Brie texture. Milchwissenschaft 45,589-593. Norris, G.E., Gray, I.K. and Dolby, R.M. (1973). Seasonal variations in the composition and thermal properties of New Zealand milk fat. J. Dairy Res. 40,311-321. Paquet, A. and Kalab, M. (1988). Amino acid composition and structure of cheese baked as a pizza ingredient in conventional and microwave ovens. Food Microstruct. 7, 93-103. Peleg, M. (1976). Texture profile analysis parameters obtained by an Instron universal testing machine..1. Food Sci. 41, 721-722. Pereira, R.B., Bennett, R.J., Hemar, Y. and Camanella, O.H. (2001). Rheological and microstructural characteristics of model processed cheese analogues. J. Text. Stud. 32,349-373. Pons, M. and Fiszman, S.M. (1996). Instrumental texture profile analysis with particular reference to gelled systems. J. Text. Stud. 27, 597-624. Prentice, J.H., Langley, K.R. and Marshall, RJ. (1993). Cheese rheology, in, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology. Vol. 1, General Aspects, 2nd edn, Fox, P.E, ed., Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 303-340. Rao, VN.M. (1992). Classification, description and measurement of viscoelastic properties of solid foods, in, Viscoelastic Properties of Foods, Rao, M.A. and Steffe, J.E, eds, Elsevier Science Publishers, London. pp. 3-47. Rao, M.A. and Steffe, J.E (1992). Viscoelastic Properties of Foods. Elsevier Science Publishers, London. Rosenthal, A.J. (1999). Food Texture: Measurement and Perception. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD. Shama, E and Sherman, P. (1973). Stress relaxation during force - compression studies on food with Instron testing machine, d. Text. Stud. 4,353-362. Sharma, S.K., Mulvaney, S.J. and Rizvi, S.S.H. (1999). Food Process Engineering: Theory and Laboratory Experiments. Wiley-Interscience, New York. Sherman, P. (1969). A texture profile of foodstuffs based upon well-defined rheological properties. J. Food Sci. 34, 458-462. Sherman, P. (1983). Rheological properties of emulsions, in, Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, Vol. 1, Becher, P., ed., Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 403-437. Steffe, J.A. (1996). Rheological Methods in Food Process Engineering, 2nd edn, Freeman Press, East Lansing, MI. Subramanian, R. and Gunasekaran, S. (1997a). Small amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) studies on Mozzarella cheese. Part 1. Region of linear viscoelasticity: J. Text. Stud. 28, 633-642. Subramanian, R. and Gunasekaran, S. (1997b). Small amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) studies on Mozzarella cheese. Part 2. Relaxation spectrum. J. Text. Stud. 28, 643-656. Szczesniak, A.S. (1963a). Classification of textural characteristics. J. Food Sci. 28,385-389. Szczesniak, A.S. (1963b). Objective measurements of food texture. J. Food Sci. 28,410-420. Szczesniak, A.S. (1998). Sensory texture profiling- historical and sensory perspectives. Food Technol. 52, 52-57.
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
Taneya, S., Izutsu, T. and Sone, T. (1979). Dynamic viscoelasticity of natural cheese and processed cheese, in, Food Texture and Rheology, Sherman, P., ed., Academic Press, London. pp. 369-383. Tanner, R.I. (2000). Engineering Rheology, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Truong, V.D. and Daubert, C.R. (2000). Comparative study of large strain methods for assessing failure characteristics of selected food gels. J. Text. Stud. 31,335-353. Truong, V.D. and Daubert, C.R. (2001). Textural characterization of cheeses using vane rheometry and torsion analysis.J. Food Sci. 66, 716-721. Truong, V.D., Daubert, C.R., Drake, M.A. and Baxter, S.R. (2002). Vane rheometry for textural characterization of Cheddar cheeses: correlation with other instrumental and sensory measurements, kebensm.-Wiss, u.-Technol. 35, 305-314. Tunick, M.H., Nolan, E.J., Shieh, J.J., Basch, J.J., Thompson, M.P., Maleeff, B.E. and Holsinger, V.H. (1990). Cheddar and Cheshire cheese rheology. J. Dairy 5ci. 73, 1671-1675. Tunick, M.H., Mackey, K.L., Smith, P.W. and Holsinger, V.H. (1991). Effects of composition and storage on the texture of Mozzarella cheese. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 45, 117-125. Ustunol, Z., Kawachi, K. and Steffe, J. (1995). Rheological properties of Cheddar cheese as influenced by fat reduction and ripening time.J. Food 5ci. 60, 1208-1210. van Vliet, T. (1991a). Terminology to be used in cheese rheology, in, Rheological and fracture properties of cheese. Bulletin No. 268. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 5-15. van Vliet, T. (1991b). Inventory of test methods, in, Rheological and fracture properties of cheese. Bulletin No. 268. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 16-25. Venugopal, V. and Muthukumarappan, K. (2001). Stress relaxation characteristics of Cheddar cheese. Int. J. Food Prop. 4, 469-484. Visser, J. (1991). Factors affecting the rheological and fracture properties of hard and semi-hard cheese, in, Rheological and Fracture Properties of Cheese. Bulletin 268. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 49-61. Walstra, P and van Vliet, T. (1982). Rheology of cheese. Bulletin 153. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 22-27. Walstra, 13. and van Vliet, T. (1986). The physical chemistry of curd making. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 40,241-259. Weaver, J.C., Kroger, M. and Thompson, M.P. (1978). Free amino acid and rheological measurements on hydrolyzed lactose Cheddar cheese during ripening. J. Food Sci. 43, 579-583. Weinrichter, B., Rohm, H. and Jaros, D. (2000). Mechanical properties of unpressed semi-hard cheeses by uniaxial compression. J. Text. Stud. 31,141-152. Whorlow, R.W. (1992). Rheological Techniques. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England. Xiong, R., Meullenet, J.-E, Hankins, J.A. and Chung, W.K. (2002). Relationship between sensory and instrumental hardness of commercial cheeses. J. Food 5ci. 67, 877-883. Yang, C.S.T. and Taranto, M.V. (1982). Textural properties of Mozzarella cheese analogs manufactured from soybeans. J. Food Sci. 47,906-910.
539
Glossary Cauchy strain. See Engineering strain. Compliance. Symbol J, is the ratio of strain to stress. In the elastic region, J = 1/G', where G' is shear (or storage) modulus. Cox-Merz rule. This rule states that the (steady) viscosity versus shear rate curve is virtually identical to the viscosity versus frequency curve, determined by dynamic oscillation. Creep. The response to a constant applied (normal or shear) stress. Creep can be expressed in terms of strain or compliance. Creep compliance. The ratio of strain, y(t), resulting from an applied constant stress, Zc, to the stress, i.e., 7(t)/~'c. Creep modulus. The inverse of creep compliance, i.e.,
~-d~,(t). Deformability modulus. Slope of the stress-strain curve in an approximately linear region, typically up to a strain of ~0.10. Elastic material behaviour. An elastic deformation is one where the material recovers fully u p o n removal of applied stress without time dependency, i.e., recovery is instantaneous and complete u p o n removal of stress. Elastoplastic material behaviour. W h e n the stress in the material exceeds a certain limit, irreversible deformation results with negligible time dependency, i.e., partial recovery is instantaneous upon removal of stress; also k n o w n as elastoplastic deformation. Engineering strain. Deformation relative to original sample dimension, i.e., AL/Lo, is called engineering strain, or Cauchy strain, or strain. Engineering stress. The ratio between applied force, F, and original sample area, Ao, is k n o w n as engineering stress or stress. Fracture work. See Toughness. Kelvin element. Also k n o w n as a Voigt element or a Kelvin-Meyer solid. This is a mechanical model consisting of a spring in parallel with a dashpot. A number of such elements in series, with a spectrum of time constants, can be used to simulate creep compliance. Kinematic viscosity. This is the ratio between dynamic viscosity and density. Units: m2/s = 10 4 stokes. Linear behaviour. If one measured parameter varies in proportion to another, e.g., stress in proportion to a range of applied strain, their behaviour is described as linear and a modulus may be defined as the ratio between the parameters, e.g., Young's modulus. Linear viscoelastic deformation. Cheese and other organic materials exhibit a combination of elastic and viscous behaviour at low strains, i.e., they recover their shape upon removal of applied stress, but not instantly. The elastic and viscous effects can be determined using
540
Rheology andTexture of Cheese
low-amplitude oscillatory rheometry. At low amplitudes of oscillation there is a constant relationship between the elastic and viscous components of complex modulus. Consequently, displacements of this type are referred to as linear viscoelastic deformation. Loss modulus. The ratio between the out-of-phase component of shear stress and shear strain (G" = r"lT) in a dynamic oscillatory measurement; also referred to as viscous modulus. Maxwell element. This is a mechanical model consisting of a spring in series with a dashpot. A combination of such elements in parallel, with a spectrum of time constants, may be used to simulate relaxation behaviour in a viscoelastic material. Modulus of deformability. See Deformability modulus. Poisson effect. W h e n a sample is compressed it bulges in the lateral direction, i.e., the cross-section increases with compression; this is the Poisson effect. The ratio between lateral strain and longitudinal strain is k n o w n as Poisson's ratio. Poisson's ratio equals 0.5 in the absence of a volume change, and is less than 0.5 for a compressible material. Shear modulus. The ratio between the in-phase components of shear stress and shear strain (G' = r'/T) in a dynamic oscillatory measurement; also referred to as storage, elastic, or in-phase, modulus. Storage modulus. See Shear modulus. Strength. The m a x i m u m stress a material withstands before it breaks (i.e., fractures) or flows (i.e., becomes plastic). Stress. See Engineering stress. Stress relaxation m o d u l u s . The stress that is required to maintain a constant deformation is observed, as a function of time (i.e., in a stress relaxation test). The ratio of shear stress to strain is k n o w n as stress relaxation modulus, or relaxation modulus. The relaxation modulus depends on the applied strain if the strain exceeds the limit of linear viscoelasticity. Thus, G(t, T) = r(t)/% Stress relaxation test. This test involves an initial application of (a normal or shear) strain at a constant rate up to a pre-determined level of strain and then measuring
the decay of stress as a function of time while holding the sample at constant strain; also k n o w n as a step strain transient test. Toughness. The work required to fracture; this is measured as the area under a force-deformation curve up to the point of fracture (Fig. 23). True strain. The accumulated strain during the applied loading, e' = In (ULo), where In is the natural logarithm, L is the sample length under load, and Lo is the original sample length, is k n o w n as the true strain, Hencky strain or natural strain. This is applicable where the strain is large and sample cross-section changes appreciably under the load. True strain is not used very much in cheese rheology. True strain can be related to engineering strain, e, using, e' = In (1 + e). True stress. The ratio between applied force, F, and actual area of cross-section, A', is termed true stress. Thus, O'true FIA', where A' is the actual area, taking the Poisson effect into account. Uniaxial compressive strength. The apparent stress at fracture, i.e., Fo/Ao, where Fo is the compression force at fracture and Ao is the initial cross-sectional area of the sample. Viscoelastic material behaviour. Where rheological behaviour can be resolved into elastic and viscous components, e.g., as represented by a Maxwell model. Viscoplastic material behaviour. In contrast to elastic behaviour, this is a time-dependent and irreversible deformation that occurs when a certain stress level has been exceeded, i.e., strain does not respond instantaneously to applied stress, but instead strain keeps on growing while the stress is applied and does not return to zero upon removal of stress; also referred to as viscous material behaviour. Viscosity or dynamic viscosity. Coefficient of dynamic viscosity, 77, is the ratio between shear stress and shear rate. = rl~ where r is shear stress and ~ is shear rate. Units: Pa.s or N.s/m 2 = 10 poise. Viscous modulus. See Loss modulus. Young's modulus. The ratio between normal stress and engineering strain (E = ole). =
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese C.W. Donnelly, Department of Nutrition and Food Science The University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
Introduction Cheesemaking evolved centuries ago as a means of preserving raw milk via fermentation. Selection of the beneficial natural flora in milk, such as lactobacilli, streptococci and lactococci, or direct addition of these as starter cultures, preserves products and in many instances allows competition with bacterial pathogens. However, cheeses can become contaminated with pathogens as a result of their presence in the raw milk used for cheesemaking and subsequent survival during the cheesemaking process. Alternatively, bacterial pathogens can contaminate cheese via post-processing contamination if sanitation and other measures in the processing plant are not sufficient to prevent re-contamination (Linnan et al., 1988; Johnson et al., 1990a). The characteristics of the specific cheese variety will dictate the potential for growth and survival of microbial pathogens, with ripened soft cheeses presenting a higher risk for growth and survival of pathogens than aged hard cheeses where a combination of factors, including pH, salt content and aw, interact to render cheeses microbiologically safe. Although cheeses have been linked with documented outbreaks of food-borne illness, epidemiological evidence collected from around the world confirms that this occurs infrequently (Johnson et al., 1990a; Ahekruse et al., 1998; De Buyser et al., 2001). This chapter will provide an overview of factors which affect growth and survival of microbial pathogens in cheese.
Factors that Influence the Safety of Cheese The pathogens, Salmonella enterica, listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and enteropathogenic E. coli (ETEC) pose the greatest risk to the safety of cheese 0ohnson et al., 1990a; De Buyser et al., 2001; Leuschner and Boughtflower, 2002). If active lactic acid starter cultures are used, Staph. aureus is considered to be a low-risk pathogen (Johnson et al., 1990a). However, in traditional cheeses where active starter cultures are not used, Staph. aureus may pose a significant risk for toxin production in cheese if numbers are sufficiently high. The factors that contribute to
the safety of cheese with respect to pathogenic bacteria include milk quality, starter culture or native lactic acid bacterial growth during cheesemaking, pH, salt, control of aging conditions and chemical changes that occur in cheese during aging (Johnson et al., 1990c). Other technologies (e.g., use of starter cultures that produce substances inhibitory to pathogens) may provide opportunities to add additional barriers to the growth of bacterial pathogens. It is particularly important for the producers of raw milk cheeses to have a documented and systematic approach to ensure product safety. Pathogens in raw milk
S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, Staph. aureus and ETEC are associated with raw milk. E. coli 0157:H7 can readily contaminate raw milk on the farm with contamination levels of 4.2-10% and 2% reported in the US and Canada, respectively (D'Aoust, 1989; Padhye and Doyle, 1991). Over 70 cases of E. coli infection, characterized by bloody diarrhea, haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and kidney failure, have been traced to the consumption of raw milk (Martin et al., 1986; Borczyk et al., 1987; Bleem, 1994) with a few additional cases in England linked to yoghurt (Morgan et al., 1993). E. coli 0157:H7 was first characterized in 1982 during epidemiological investigations of two outbreaks which occurred in North America. Cattle are thought to be the principal reservoir for this important human pathogen, and in investigations where food has been identified as the vehicle of transmission, ground beef is the product most frequently linked to human illness. Shere et al. (1998), in a longitudinal study of E. coli dissemination on four Wisconsin dairy farms, identified contaminated animal drinking water as the most probable vehicle for infection of animals and a potential intervention point for on-farm control of dissemination of this pathogen. Since shedding of this pathogen by cattle is intermittent, re-inoculation from an environmental source rather than colonization of the pathogen is the more likely explanation than intermittent shedding.
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 1: General Aspects ISBN: 0-1226-3652-X Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
542
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
S. enterica serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium and Dublin have been associated with food-borne disease outbreaks involving raw milk and milk products (Maguire et al., 1992; Cody et al., 1999; Villar et al., 1999; De Valk etal., 2000). A 1987 FDA survey revealed the presence of salmonella in 32 of 678 (4.7%) samples of raw milk obtained from bulk-tank trucks in Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois, with 10 of 16 (62.5%) collection sites also testing positive (McManus and Lanier, 1987). Salmonella spp. were isolated from 26 of 292 (8.9%) of farm bulk tank samples collected in eastern Tennessee and southwest Virginia (Rohrbach et al., 1992). Wells et al. (2001) examined recovery of salmonella from faecal samples obtained from dairy cows in 91 herds from 19 US states. Salmonella spp. were recovered from 5.4% of the samples. Recovery levels from cows on farms with less than 100 animals were much lower (0.6%) than those from farms with over 100 cows, where recovery levels were 8.8%. The incidence of Salmonella spp. in milk samples would be expected to occur at a much lower frequency than in faecal samples. Most farmstead cheesemakers maintain small dairy herds, where the lower incidence data would apply. S. enterica serotype Typhimurium definitive type (DT) 104 emerged in the UK as an important source of human infection in the late 1980s (Threlfall et al., 1996). Subsequent outbreaks of human illness traced to dairy sources were reported in Vermont (Friedman et al., 1998), Nebraska, California (Cody et al., 1999) and Washington State (Villar et al., 1999). This organism is notable because it is resistant to multiple antibiotics. Two outbreaks of S. enterica subsp, enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104 infection were recently linked to the consumption of Mexican-style soft cheese manufactured from raw milk (Cody et al., 1999; Villar et al., 1999). Aceto et al. (2000) conducted a survey to assess the herd prevalence of 5. enterica subsp, enterica serotype typhimurium DT 104 in Pennsylvania dairy herds. Of 51 farms surveyed, 11 were positive for salmonella species and 4 for 5. typhimuriurn, 2 of which were DT-104 positive. S. enterica serovar Dublin is present in dairy cattle and was identified as the most invasive of the salmonella bacteria for humans in studies conducted in Denmark (Lester et al., 1995). Beckers et al. (1987) and Lovett et al. (1987) estimate that extremely low levels of L. monocytogenes (0.5-1.0 ml) exist in commercial bulk-tank raw milk. Listeria is inactivated by pasteurization, and contamination of processed dairy products is therefore most likely a function of post-pasteurization contamination from the dairy plant environment. In fact, numerous surveys document the presence of listeria within the dairy plant environment, including floors in coolers, freezers, processing rooms, particularly entrances, cases
and case washers, floor mats and foot baths and the beds of paper fillers (Charlton et al., 1990; Klausner and Donnelly, 1991). Pritchard et al. (1994), in a study of dairy processing facilities, found that processing plants near a farm had a significantly higher incidence of listeria contamination than those without an on-site dairy farm. Arimi et al. (1997) demonstrated the link between on-farm sources of listeria contamination (dairy cattle, raw milk and silage) and subsequent contamination of dairy-processing environments. These investigators subjected listeria strains collected from farms and dairy processing environments over a 10-year period to strain-specific ribotyping using the automated Riboprinter T M microbial characterization system. A total of 388 listeria isolates from 20 different dairy processing facilities were examined along with 44 silage, 14 raw-milk bulk tank and 29 dairy cattle isolates. These 475 isolates included 93 L. monocytogenes, 362 L. innocua, 11 L. welshimeri, 6 L. seeligeri, 2 L. grayii and 1 L. ivanovii strains. Thirty-seven different listeria ribotypes (RTs) comprising 16 L. monocytogenes (including five known clinical RTs responsible for food-borne listeriosis), 12 L. innocua, 5 L. welshimeri, 2 L. seeligeri, 1 L. ivanovii and 1 L. grayii were identified. Greatest diversity was seen among the isolates from dairy-processing facilities with 14 of 16 (87.5%) L. monocytogenes RTs (including 5 clinical RTs), and 19 out of 21 (90.5%) non-L, monocytogenes RTs detected. Sixty-five of the ninety-three L. monocytogenes isolates belonged to the group of the five clinical RTs, which included one RT unique to dairy-processing environments, two RTs common to dairy-processing environments and silage, and one RT common to dairyprocessing environments, silage, raw milk and dairy cattle with the last RT appearing in dairy-processing environments, silage, raw-milk bulk tanks and dairy cattle. The finding of eight L. rnonocytogenes and twelve non-L, monocytogenes RTs common to both dairyprocessing and farm environments clearly implicates the farm as a natural reservoir for listeria RTs capable of entering dairy-processing facilities. These findings, which support the link between on-farm sources of listeria contamination (dairy cattle, raw milk and silage) and subsequent contamination of dairy-processing environments, stress the importance of farm-based Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) programmes for controlling listeria. This work also showed that two important clinical L. monocytogenes ribotypes which were previously identified as RT 19092 and RT 19161 and epidemiologically linked to listeriosis cases involving pasteurized milk and turkey frankfurters were recovered from dairy-processing facilities A and B for 12 and 3 months, respectively, with L. innocua RT 19094 also present in these same two facilities for at least five years.
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
Abou-Eleinin et al. (2000) analysed 450 goats' milk samples obtained from the bulk tanks of 39 goat farms for listeria spp. over a 1-year period. Modified versions of the USDA-FSIS (McClain and Lee,1989) and FDA (Lovett et al., 1987) protocols were used for recovery of listeria. Overall, 35 (7.8%) samples yielded listeria, with L. monocytogenes identified in 17 of the 35 (3.8%) listeria-positive samples and L. innocua in 26 (5.8%) of samples. Eight milk samples contained both L. monocytogenes and L. innocua. Milk samples from 18 of the 39 (46.2%) farms were positive for listeria at least once during the year-long study. Five different listeria RTs were identified from 34 selected L. rnonocytogenes isolates, 2 of which were deemed to be of clinical importance. Isolation rates of listeria were markedly higher during the winter (14.3%) and spring (10.4%), compared to autumn (5.3%) and summer (0.9%). Similar trends have been previously reported for cows' milk (Reaet al., 1992; Ryser, 1999). Milk quality
Raw-milk quality is important in producing all cheeses, but particularly for those made from raw milk. Low bacterial counts and low somatic cell counts are the key indicators of milk quality, and as their numbers increase, there is a higher risk for contamination of milk and cheese with pathogens. Monitoring and controlling bacteria and somatic cell counts in milk should be components of a HACCP programme to ensure product safety. As rapid, cost-effective methods become available for detection of bacterial pathogens in raw milk, the use of specific pathogen testing could become part of a HACCP programme. In general, when rawmilk bacteria and somatic cell counts are high, there will be other negative impacts on cheese quality that may reduce consumer acceptability and cheese yield. In most artisanal cheesemaking, the time from milking to cheesemaking is very short and in some cases the milk is made into cheese immediately on the farm without cooling. Minimizing the time from milk collection to the initiation of cheesemaking reduces the opportunity for the growth of undesirable bacteria in raw milk. Conversely, when milk is cooled and held in transport, the opportunity for pathogen growth, particularly growth of psychrotrophic pathogens, is increased. The European Community Directives 92/46 and 92/47 (Anonymous, 1992) contain regulations for the hygienic production and placing on the market of raw milk, heat-treated milk and milk-based products. These regulations establish hygienic standards for raw-milk collection and transport that focus on issues such as temperature, sanitation and microbiological standards, enabling the production of raw milk of the highest
543
possible quality. Raw cows' milk must meet quality standards, e.g., a standard plate count at 30 ~ of < 100 000 cfu/ml and somatic cell counts of -64.5 ~ (148.2 ~ for 16.2 sec (Line et al., 1991) which is similar to that required for most salmonella except S. sen ftenberg. Much of the aged raw milk cheese produced in the US is subjected to some form of heat treatment, generally thermization. This treatment generally consists of heat treatment at 55 ~ for a period ranging from 2 to 16 sec. The specific impact of this heat treatment combined with the interactive effects of salt and pH during subsequent ripening on pathogens such as listeria, salmonella and E. coli has not been well explored.
Extrinsic and intrinsic parameters in cheese which dictate microbial growth
Growth of microbial pathogens in cheese is dictated by extrinsic and intrinsic parameters. The important intrinsic parameters include moisture content, pH and acidity, nutrient content, redox potential, presence of antimicrobial compounds, either those occurring naturally or those which are added as food preservatives, e.g., NOs, and the presence of competitive microflora (ICMSE 1986). All of these factors dictate the potential for bacterial pathogens to grow, persist or decline in cheeses. Extrinsic parameters include factors such as type of packaging/packaging atmosphere, time and temperature of storage and holding conditions, processing steps, product history and traditional use. The interaction of these factors dictates the potential for microbial growth in cheese. Depending on the cheese variety, intrinsic parameters such as pH may serve to enhance or inhibit the growth of bacterial pathogens. Ryser and Marth (1987a) studied the behaviour of L. monocytogenes in Camembert cheese. The high moisture content and the neutral pH of this surface-ripened cheese facilitate growth and survival of pathogens such as listeria. Growth of listeria in Camembert cheese was found to parallel the increase in cheese pH during ripening and reached a final population of 106-108 per g. This contrasts with Blue cheese, where listeria failed to grow and decreased in number during
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
56 days of storage (Papageorgiou and Marth, 1989). These authors suggested that Penicilliurn roqueforti may produce bacteriocins against L. monocytogenes. In hard cheese varieties like Colby and Cheddar, L. monocytogenes populations decline during aging, with survival strongly influenced by the moisture content and the pH (Ryser and Marth, 1987b; Yousef and Marth, 1990). Cheeses such as Camembert and Feta have nearly identical composition in terms of moisture content, water activity, % salt-in-water and ripening temperature. However, fully ripened Camembert has a pH of 7.5 versus Feta which has a pH of 4.4 that prevents the growth of listeria. Cheeses made from raw milk
In the US and other parts of the world, the manufacture of cheese from raw milk is a topic which is being revisited from the perspective of microbiological safety. Pasteurization of milk prior to cheesemaking is but one step that may reduce the risk of the presence of pathogenic bacteria in cheese. Current US regulations which govern the use of raw, heat-treated and pasteurized milk for cheesemaking were promulgated in 1949 (Anonymous, 1950; 21 CFR Part 133). One of the two options can be selected by cheesemakers to assure the safety of cheesepasteurize milk destined for cheesemaking or hold cheese at a temperature of not less than 1.7 ~ (35 ~ for a minimum of 60 days. Recent research has shown that S. typhimurium, E. coli 0157:H7 and L. monocytogenes can survive well beyond the mandatory 60-day holding period in Cheddar cheese prepared from pasteurized milk (Reitsma and Henning, 1996; Ryser, 1998). In a referral to the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods in April 1997, the FDA asked if a revision of policy requiring a minimum 60-day aging period for raw-milk hard cheeses was necessary. The FDA, in its communication, noted that such a duration may be insufficient to provide an adequate level of public health protection. The FDA cited numerous studies and outbreak investigations documenting the presence of listeria, salmonella and E. coli 0157:H7 in raw milk. Of particular concern was the report by Reitsma and Henning (1996) detailing the survival of E. coli 0157:H7 in aged Cheddar cheese. The FDA did note, however, that there was 'limited epidemiological evidence that food-borne illness results from consumption of raw-milk hard cheeses that have been aged for 60 days', citing work by Fabian (1947), D'Aoust et al. (1985) and Johnson et al. (1990b) in support of this claim. Groups outside of the US have recently expressed concern about the safety of raw-milk cheeses. The Institute of Food Science and Technology (IFST, 2000) in the UK issued a position statement drawing attention to the
545
potential public health hazards posed by pathogenic bacteria in cheeses made from raw milk. The IFST indicates that these hazards apply particularly to soft and semi-soft cheeses (IFST, 2000). Codex Alimentarious is presently recommending a 'combination of control measures' (including pasteurization) to achieve the appropriate level of public health protection (Groves, 1998). In a comprehensive review of all outbreaks of human illness associated with the consumption of aged rawmilk cheese, in the majority of instances, confounding parameters other than use of raw milk contributed to pathogens being present in the product at the time of consumption (Donnelly, 2001). Further, in challenge studies which examine the fate of pathogens in aged cheese, confounding factors can also explain the appearance of pathogens following 60 days of aging. Such confounding parameters in actual outbreaks or challenge studies involve the use of pasteurized versus raw milk in cheesemaking trials, inadequate development of acidity during cheesemaking, a low salt level, contamination by ill employees during manufacture, temperature abuse of milk designed for cheesemaking and environmental contamination during cheesemaking.
P r e v i o u s R e v i e w s on t h e S a f e t y of R a w Milk C h e e s e s
Two comprehensive reviews have been published regarding outbreaks of human illness linked to consumption of cheese. Johnson et al. (1990b) conducted a comprehensive review of the epidemiological literature during the 40-year period, 1948-1988. These authors identified only six outbreaks of illness transmitted by cheese produced in the US during this period. Post-pasteurization contamination was the most frequent causative factor in these outbreaks. Improper pasteurization equipment and/or procedures were implicated in only one outbreak each in the US and Canada, and use of raw milk was a factor in one outbreak in each of these countries. No outbreaks were linked to hard Italian cheese varieties such as Parmesan, Romano and Provolone. In rare instances, Swiss and Cheddar cheeses were linked to food-poisoning outbreaks. Factors other than pasteurization cited by Johnson et al. (1990b) as contributors to cheese safety include milk quality and management, lactic starter management, pH, salt, controlled aging conditions and natural inhibitory substances in the raw milk. These authors proposed three actions to improve the safety of raw milk cheeses: (1) Establish a guideline for minimum heat-treatment of milk for cheesemaking, e.g., 64.4 ~ (148~ for 16sec or equivalent with adequate process control, (2) Evaluate current safety
546
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
technology and practices used for cheese manufacture and (3) Evaluate technologies not currently used in cheese manufacture for safety potential (Johnson et al., 1990c). Altekruse et al. (1998) reviewed all cheese-associated outbreaks reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the period 1973-1992. These authors noted the infrequency of large, cheeseassociated outbreaks reported during this period and suggested that improvement of cheesemaking methods and process control have resulted in cheese being a safer product. There were 32 cheese-associated outbreaks, 11 of which could be attributed to contamination at the farm, during manufacturing or during processing. Of the 11 outbreaks attributed to contamination prior to distribution, 5 were associated with the consumption of Mexican-style soft cheese versus only one outbreak linked to Cheddar cheese. It is notable that no outbreaks reported to the CDC during 1973-1992 were associated with raw milk cheese that was aged for a minimum of 60 days. The authors indicated that salmonella, E. coli 0157:H7 and L. monocytogenes may survive the aging process. However, the literature reference for survival of listeria points to Camembert cheese (Ryser and Marth, 1987a), and the authors failed to note the rapid decline of listeria populations in aged Cheddar cheese as documented by Ryser and Marth (1987b). Altekruse et al. (1998) suggest that aging alone may not be a sufficient pathogen control step to eliminate salmonella, listeria and E. coli 0157:H7 from cheese. Outbreaks involving Cheddar cheese
In 1976, seven lots of Cheddar cheese manufactured from pasteurized milk were contaminated with S. heidelberg and were responsible for 339 confirmed cases of illness and an additional 28 000-36 000 cases of illness (Fontaine et al., 1980). The cheese involved was aged for less than 60 days, and improper pasteurization was cited as the cause of the outbreak. Follow-up with the first few patients led epidemiologists to suspect cheese eaten in Mexican-style restaurants as the vehicle of infection. Seven lots of Cheddar cheese produced from pasteurized milk by a Kansas manufacturer and purchased from a single Denver distributor were identified as the potential sources of contamination. The epidemic began in July in two widely separated Colorado cities, Denver and Pueblo. Levels of S. heidelberg in these cheeses were estimated to be 0.36-1.8 per 100 g. The pH of contaminated cheese was 5.6, which may have been a factor in this outbreak. Poor manufacturing practices coupled with inadequate control programmes at the cheese plant were cited as causative factors in this outbreak. The Kansas State Health Department had
recorded 25 instances of non-compliance with good manufacturing practices by that particular food-processing plant. The Kansas Board of Agriculture required that raw milk contain 105 per g), which may indicate poor starter activity (Johnson et al., 1990b) or contamination through handling. It is difficult to understand how D'Aoust et al. (1985) could support their concluding statement in this article 'Although pasteurization of milk used in cheesemaking increases the safety of the finished product, use of heat-treated (unpasteurized) milk in the manufacture of medium and old Cheddar cheese and survival of salmonella during prolonged periods of refrigerated storage raises legitimate doubts of the safety of current manufacturing practices.' In the data presented, pasteurization did not result in the unequivocal safety of mild Cheddar cheese. An evaluation of the pasteurization process, described by Johnson et al. (1990b), indicated that the employee in charge of the process manually overrode the electronic controls, which shut down the pasteurizer while milk continued to flow through the unit and into the vat. The pasteurizer was shut down after filling three vats and later restarted to fill the next three vat series. The first and the third vats of each three vat sequence tested positive for salmonella, except for the first vat of the day and the middle vat of each three vat series which consistently tested negative. This pattern only occurred when raw milk which included milk from the cow shedding S. typhirnurium was used. Bezanson et al. (1985) subsequently subjected outbreak strains to molecular analysis by biotyping, antibiotic resistance patterns, plasmid restriction and endonuclease analyses and revealed that two genetically distinct organisms were the aetiologic agents in this outbreak. These studies revealed the existence of a double infection, indicating that the incriminated cheese likely had two sources of contamination. S. typhimurium phage type 10 subgroup I strains were identified among cultures from raw milk and cattle associated with the incriminated dairy. S. typhimurium phage type 10 subgroup I and II strains were recovered from individuals employed at the dairy along with their family members. S. typhirnuriurn subgroup I and II strains were present in cheese curd samples obtained from the plant as well as from a consumer pack obtained from a distributor. Cheese plant workers from whom both subgroup I and II strains were cultured were involved in the production and/or packaging of Cheddar cheese, raising questions about the possibility of contamination of the cheese by ill workers. Salmonella were confirmed in a cheese-trim bucket. Plant inspections revealed that employees used their bare hands to transfer cheese to a forming machine, and an employee tested
547
positive for S. typhimurium. It is likely that this incriminated cheese was also responsible for an outbreak of illness reported at the same time in Ontario linked to S. typhimurium phage type 10 biotype 4 (D'Aoust et al., 1985). Hedberg et al. (1992) reported on a multi-state outbreak of S. javiana and S. oranienburg linked to the consumption of contaminated Mozzarella cheese and shredded cheese products. Cases were more likely to have consumed cheese manufactured at a single cheese plant or cheese shredded at processing plants that also shredded cheese from the single plant, than matched controls. The outbreak strains were isolated from 2 of 68 unopened 16-oz blocks of Mozzarella cheese. Inspections revealed deficiencies in plant sanitation and cleaning, and equipment was not routinely cleaned and sanitized between shredding different types of cheese from different manufacturers. However, no deficiencies in pasteurization were identified. Cheese-manufacturing equipment was found to be susceptible to environmental contamination and contamination by aerosols. Investigators believed that the contaminated Mozzarella cheese sent to four processing plants for shredding, crosscontaminated other cheese products at those plants. It is most likely that the cheese was contaminated from environmental sources or from infected production workers. Four outbreaks occurring in the late 1990s were reported in the UK, although detailed epidemiologic data on these outbreaks is lacking. An outbreak of E. coli 0157:H7 (phage type 8, Verotoxin gene 2) infection involving 22 cases was reported in Scotland in 1994. This outbreak was associated with the consumption of raw-milk cheese (Anonymous, 1997a). A December 1996 outbreak of salmonella gold-coast which occurred in England and Wales was linked to the consumption of a brand of mild, coloured, Cheddar cheese produced in August and September 1996 in Somerset, England. Phosphatase tests and examination of recording chart records from the pasteurizer indicated that pasteurization had failed at the plant on several occasions (Anonymous, 1997b). An outbreak of infection caused by E. coli 0157:H7 (phage type 21/28 VT2) was reported in 1999 in north-east England (Anonymous, 1999a,b). The vehicle of infection was Cotherstone cheese, a rawmilk cheese, manufactured in small quantities and distributed to specialty cheese shops in England. Samples from the dairy herd, slurry and environmental samples from the cheese manufacturing facilities were negative for E. coli 0157:H7. In March of 1999, a large outbreak of infection was reported in England and Wales due to consumption of contaminated milk from a single dairy. An outbreak of E. coli 0157:H7 infection was reported which was linked to the consumption of fresh cheese
548
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
curd, which was held for < 60 days, from a dairy plant in Wisconsin (Durch et al., 2000). Nineteen of 55 laboratory-confirmed patients had purchased cheese curds from an unrefrigerated display at the cheese plant. To be legal, cheese curds must be manufactured from pasteurized milk. Vats of raw-milk Cheddar cheese were inadvertently used to make fresh curds, which were incorrectly labelled as 'pasteurized' Cheddar cheese curd. A comprehensive risk assessment would consider, among other factors, the degree to which the consuming population is exposed to risks associated with the consumption of aged raw-milk cheeses. Cheddar cheese is produced worldwide and is therefore considered an important variety of hard cheese. The USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, reports that Cheddar cheese was the most popular variety of cheese produced and consumed in the US in 1999, with a production level of 2.8 billion pounds (1.2 million tonnes) or 35.4% of the total cheese produced (Anonymous, 1999c). Given that a large amount of this cheese is produced from raw or heat-treated milk, the high degree of exposure (consumption) of this product coupled with the low incidence of disease outbreaks attests to the safety of aged cheese made from raw and heat-treated milk. Table 1 summarizes outbreaks involving Cheddar cheese which have occurred since 1976. Listed in this table are confounding parameters which contributed to the presence of pathogens in the finished product and the subsequent onset of human illness.
Challenge Studies Reitsma and Henning (1996) examined the survival of E. coli 0157:H7 during the manufacture and ripening of Cheddar cheese. E. coli 0157:H7 was inoculated at two levels into pasteurized milk, 1 x 103 cfu/ml and 1 cfu/ml. The organism showed a sharp decrease in numbers over the 158-day testing period. Treatment 1 (1000 cfu/ml) showed a 2-log CFU/g reduction after 60 days of ripening; however, E. coli 0157:H7 was still present even after 158 days of ripening when viable cells were detected in four of five replicates. Treatment 2 (1 cfu/g) showed a reduction to < 1 cfu/g in 60 days, with no viable E. coli 0157:H7 detected at 158 days. As the authors state, 'the results of this study cannot predict the behaviour of heat-injured cells which could result from the pasteurization of naturally contaminating E. coli.' Further, the low salt-in-moisture content (SM) and absence of natural inhibitors present in raw milk create an artificially protective environment for E. coli 0157:H7 in pasteurized milk. The SM determines the water activity, which, in turn, dictates the potential for growth of a micro-organism in the cheese environment. The SM in that study ranged from 2.75 to
3.76% with a mean of 3.25%, whereas in normal Cheddar, the SM ranges from 4 to 6%. The low SM could have affected the results in the study of Reitsma and Henning (1996) and the authors recommend further research with Cheddar containing a higher SM to determine if similar results would be obtained with an SM more commonly encountered in Cheddar cheese. NaC1 is an important inhibitor of microbial growth in cheese. The major roles of NaC1 in Cheddar cheese are to check lactic acid fermentation after an optimum peak has been attained, reduce moisture through syneresis of the curd, suppress the growth of spoilage micro-organisms and create physical changes in cheese proteins which influence cheese texture, protein solubility and protein conformation (Fox et al., 2000; 'Salt in Cheese: Physical, Chemical and Biological Aspects', Volume 1). While there are no state or federal standards for the amount of salt added to Cheddar cheese, variations in salt content from 0.8 to 2% are common. The minimum aw (adjusted with NaC1) for the growth of E. coli is 0.950 (Fennema, 1985). Further, most raw milk receives some form of heat treatment, albeit subpasteurization. The combination of heat, salt and natural inhibitors could provide barriers to the survival of E. coli 0157:H7. The experimental design used by Reitsma and Henning (1996) failed to consider these potential safeguards. It is plausible that the use of pasteurized milk for cheesemaking provides E. coli 0157:H7 with a more protective environment than raw milk, thus heat treatment could create more of a problem to food safety. The authors state 'The low number of outbreaks seem to indicate that pathogens in cheese are not a major problem.' The authors further state 'treatment 1 (1000 cfu/ml) would not likely be encountered in industry because of co-mingling of milk from several or many farms, thus creating a dilution effect.' Concern is expressed about the authors' concluding statement 'The current requirement for ripening of Cheddar cheese will not assure consumers of a safe product if the cheese is made from raw milk and a pathogen such as E. coli 0157:H7 is present in the cheese at the beginning of ripening.' This statement is contradicted by the authors' own data which show that E. coli 0157:H7 present at 60 cfu/g in curd after salting was reduced to < 1 cfu/g after 60 days, even in the artificially low SM of cheeses in the study. A subsequent study by Zhang and Henning (1999) described mathematically the decline of E. coli populations during cheese ripening. The authors inoculated pasteurized whole milk with E. coli biotype 1 at populations of 100-1000/ml. The authors used a complete factorial design to investigate the effects of high- and low-level environmental factors such as moisture (34-40%), pH (5.1-5.6), temperature (4-13 ~ and salt
Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese
549
Table 1 Data from outbreak investigations involving aged raw milk cheese and confounding parameters which contribute to the presence of pathogens
Number of cases
Cheese type
Confounding parameter
339 confirmed; 28 00036 000 suspected
Cheddar made from pasteurized milk
1. Raw milk did not meet standards 2. Raw milk stored 1-3 days in holding tank - no refrigeration 3. Milk filtered after pasteurization 4. Cheese pH, 5.6 5.25 instances of noncompliance with GMP Milk traced to single farm; lack of co-mingling 1. Employee manually shut down pasteurizer 2. Group II type shed by workers 1. Deficiencies in cleaning and sanitation 2. Equipment not routinely cleaned and sanitized between shredding of different cheese types from different makers 3. Cheese equipment susceptible to contamination from environment/aerosols 4. Cheese contaminated by infected workers 5. No deficiencies in pasteurization Incorrectly labelled as a pasteurized product
Date
Location
Isolate
1976
Colorado
Salmonella heidelberg
1980-1982
Ontario
Salmonella muenster
1984
4 Canadian Atlantic Provinces and Ontario
Salmonella typhimurium phage type 10, group I and II
>2700 confirmed cases
Cheddar made from pasteurized and/or heattreated milk
1989
Multistate (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York)
Salmonella javiana and Salmonella oranienburg
164
Shredded cheese
1999
Raw-milk Cheddar
E. coil 0157:H7
concentration (0.8-1.7%) on survival of E. coli. Temperature and pH were found to have the most significant impact on survival, and there was no significant interaction among the four parameters studied. Salt concentration within the ranges used in this study (0.8-1.7%) was found to have no impact on survival of E. coll. Teo and Schlesser (2000) examined the survival of three groups of bacteria in raw-milk Cheddar cheese during cheesemaking and ripening; naturally occurring
Fresh cheese curd held for
.O
.E E
E~
c
~c0~c4
r,.O t.~ r.,.O O
co
CO
CO
.~-O
~
L~ O'~ r..O r,..O CO O,.I CO 00 O O O O
~
0
~ ~
O
CO
0
~ ~
~
d
~
L~
~
oooo
ddoo
0
oooo 0
oddo
O ~
dodo
O ~
mooro
0
O O
d
o
CO O O
c5c5oc5
"~-- O,,,I O
O~1 ~
c
~
~E~
~
CE ~
~
~&
~
5~
00
O
,~-
L(") O~1 CO CO
'~"
r,.O !'~
O
O,I t.O L~ CO "~-O0 00 O~1 ~ - 00
O
'~-- O I ~ 00 00 O r4D CO "~" OJ L~ CO '~" CO
O
O,.I O~ CY 00
oc5oooc5ozdc5c5c5c5
"~- O
CO LO 00
I~
O
O
C~I 00 00 00 O LO L~ 00
00 OJ
LO t.O
cO
z o,i o5
O
Zdo
lOP.-.
~" O O'~-
00 O
O-) O-)
ai~-c5
. . . .
o'~ O") (,.O O o',-
.~-- ,~!- I,,.,.. r,,.C) .r-
I~ 00
LO "~-
LO T L~ (..O
O~
LO .~--
LO LO LO O00~ LO T - OJ O0
OJ O
ZZc5
odd
00 O
OJ "~" 00 O O O O O O
ooo
ooo
O
dc5c5
O'~ CO 00 O.~O
.~- O
O
00 '~O'~
O") I'~.. 00
~!- O~1 O'~ O
Ob I ~ O O O'~-
dcSo~-cxiai
O~ 00 O O
r,.O 00 ~ I ~ '~" ~ "
O I~
00 00 t.O ~I" '~I" O0 00 00 00 CO O O O O O O O O O O
~~-
O0 I"~ O O') 00 L~ '~" O0 C~I O '~" O "v-- ~-- "r-- O O O ,~--- ,~--
oooc~doodocSdcSc5
~ O0 r ~ "~-- 't-- O
LO "~-- O O O'~ T 00 OJ ~I" OO 00 00
c~c5c5ooc5c5c5oooc5c5
00 r...O 00 "~- t ~ '~" O,.I "~- '~" 00
00 O
oodcSooodooocSc5
CO 00 O O
O
ooooc5ooooc5c5oc5
O00 I~ O
do~-cScSoodooddd
LO
i~ OJ
LO O
O~1
O
Ot.~"~'t.OC~Dt.O,,~-. Lr O L'~I O~1 '~-- O,,I O~
00 I.~- t.O LO O
O
LO LO O
O~1 " ~
O
O
O
O
O
T-
O
"~--
t~
~ - ~iOJ 00
oE~2~,~oo
._m
00 I~... O,.I OJ O ~ - O j CY '~- 00 O~1 'r-- O~1 00
O
O,.I O~1 " ~
00 00
~I" t ~
O
oooocSzcScSdcScScSd
"~"COI"~..O00~ O ~ , 1 0 OJ OJ ,,r-
O OJ
O
LO ~ 00
O00n~
o
c 0
E r
0 cO
E .c_ ..o
O c
.m_ r
._~ c t~ cr c--
r-c~
c
._c
._m
c I--
z
o
c >,,,
"5
(1) -~_..
577
578
Nutritional Aspects of Cheese
Table 3
Mineral content of selected cheeses, mg/100 g (Holland et aL, 1989)
Cheese type Brie Caerphilly Camembert Cheddar (normal) Cheddar (reduced-fat) Cheshire Cottage cheese Cream cheese Danish blue Edam Emmental Feta Fromage frais Gouda Gruyere Mozzarella Parmesan Processed cheese* Ricotta Roquefort Stilton
Na
K
Ca
Mg
P
Fe
Zn
700 480 650 670 670 550 380 300 1260 1020 450 1440 31 910 670 610 1090 1320 100 1670 930
100 91 100 77 110 87 89 160 89 97 89 95 110 91 99 75 110 130 110 91 130
540 550 350 720 840 560 73 98 500 770 970 360 89 740 950 590 1200 600 240 530 320
27 20 21 25 39 19 9 10 27 39 35 20
390 400 310 490 620 400 160 100 370 530 590 280 110 490 610 420 810 800 170 400 310
0.8 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
2.2 3.3 2.7 2.3 2.8 3.3 0.6 0.5 2.0 2.2 4.4 0.9 0.3 1.8 2.3 1.4 5.3 3.2 1.3 1.6 2.5
8 38 37 27 45 22 13 33 20
* Variety not specified.
1961) showed that the incorporation of dairy products in the diet greatly reduced the development of dental caries in rats. Reynolds and Johnson (1981) confirmed these findings. Later work (Jenkins and Ferguson, 1966; Weiss and Bibby, 1966) indicated that if enamel is treated with milk in vitro and subsequently washed, the solubility of the enamel is greatly reduced. This effect was attributed to the high levels of calcium and phosphate in milk (Jenkins and Ferguson, 1966) or to casein adsorption onto enamel surfaces (Weiss and Bibby, 1966). Reynolds and del Rio (1984) reported that both casein and whey proteins significantly reduced the extent of caries, with the former exerting the greater effect. Further evidence for the protective effect of casein was provided in a study on rats fed with caseinenriched chocolate (Reynolds and Black, 1987). Calcium and phosphate appear to become available under the acidic conditions of the plaque and reduce demineralization of enamel (Reynolds, 1997; Reynolds et al., 1999). Concentrates containing various levels of whey protein, calcium and phosphate but negligible amounts of casein, significantly reduced the incidence of dental caries in rats (Harper et al., 1987). Thus, there is evidence that milk proteins, calcium and phosphate all exert an anticariogenic effect. Guggenheim et al. (1999) reported that micellar casein inhibits oral colonization by the cariogenic Streptococcus sobrinus and dental caries in rats. Vacca-Smith et al. (1994) demonstrated that K-casein can reduce the adherence
of the cariogenic Sc. mutans to hydroxyapatite (the mineral of enamel). Rugg-Gunn et al. (1975) provided the first evidence that the consumption of cheese had an anticariogenic effect in humans. They showed that the consumption of Cheddar cheese after sweetened coffee or a sausage roll increased plaque pH, possibly due to increased salivary output. Similar effects were reported by Imfeld et al. (1978) who used a more sophisticated continuous wire telemetry procedure to monitor variations in plaque pH. The effect of eating patterns on dental caries in rats was investigated by Edgar et al. (1982). Rats fed additional meals of cheese while on a high-sucrose diet, developed fewer smooth surface carious lesions and exhibited increased salivary output (which buffers acid formed in plaque) and a reduction in the number of Sc. mutans. Harper et al. ( 1 9 8 3 ) suggested that the cariostatic effect of cheese in rats is due to its calcium phosphate and/or casein; the fat or lactose appeared to exert little influence. Further work by Rosen et al. (1984) on the effect of cheese, with or without sucrose, on dental caries and the recovery of inoculated Sc. mutans in rats indicated beneficial cariostatic effects of cheese consumption but little effect on Sc. mutans numbers. These data suggest that the cariostatic effects of cheese may not be directly related to effects on Sc. mutans. Work on the protective effects of four cheese varieties in an in vitro demineralization system suggested that most, but not all, of the protective
Nutritional Aspects of Cheese
effects of cheese could be explained by mass action effects of soluble ions, particularly calcium and phosphate (Jenkins and Harper, 1983). The effect of Cheddar cheese on experimental caries in humans was investigated by Silva et al. (1986) using an 'intraoral cariogenicity test' (ICT). Demineralization and consequent reduction in the hardness of enamel monitored in this test is assumed to be typical of the early stage of the development of caries. Enamel slabs were polished and their initial micro-hardness determined using a Knoop Indenter. The slabs were then wrapped in Dacron and fastened on a prosthetic applicance made specifically for each subject to replace a missing lower first permanent molar. The subjects chewed 5 g of cheese immediately after rinsing their mouths with 10% (w/v) sucrose. Chewing cheese immediately after sucrose rinses resulted in a 71% reduction in demineralization of the enamel slabs, raised plaque pH but caused no significant change in the microflora of plaque compared with controls. Silva et al. (1987) investigated the effects of the water-soluble components of cheese on human caries using the I CT procedure and an experimental protocol which avoided salivary stimulus caused by chewing cheese. An average reduction of 55.7% in the cariogenicity of sucrose was reported, indicating the presence of one or more water-soluble anticariogenic components in cheese. Further evidence that cheese may inhibit dental caries in the absence of saliva was provided by Krobicka et al. (1987); rats that had their saliva-secreting glands surgically removed developed fewer and less-severe lesions when fed with cheese in addition to a cariogenic diet when compared to appropriate controls. Trials on human subjects have confirmed that the consumption of hard cheese leads to significant rehardening of softened enamel surfaces (Jenkins and Hargreaves, 1989; Gedalia etal., 1991). Jensen and Wefel (1990) showed that processed cheese was both antiacidogenic and enamel-protective in human subjects fed with processed cheese four times a day for one month. Saliva flow is greatly reduced in individuals who receive head and neck irradiation for malignancies. These individuals are at high risk of developing dental caries. Sela et al. (1994) reported that hard cheese consumption by these individuals was effective in controlling caries. Moynihan et al. (1999) noted that the concentration of calcium in plaque was significantly higher in human subjects fed with cheese-containing meals than in control subjects fed with meals without cheese. The beneficial effects of cheese were observed even when it was incorporated into other foods, e.g., pasta with cheese sauce. Epidemiological studies (Pappas et al., 1995a,b) indi-
579
cate that high intake of cheese is negatively associated with root caries in elderly populations, many of whom are at high risk for such lesions. While more research is needed to define the precise mechanism(s) involved in the cariostatic effects of cheese, there is ample evidence to support the consumption of cheese as an anticaries measure (Herod, 1991; Kashket and DePaola, 2002). The most plausible mechanisms for the protective effect of cheese appear to be related to the mineralization potential of the casein-calcium phosphate of cheese, to the stimulation of saliva flow induced by its texture and/or flavour, the buffering effects of cheese proteins on acid formation in dental plaque and the inhibition of cariogenic bacteria.
References Brown, A.J. and Jessup, W. (1999). Oxysterols and atherosclerosis (review). Atherosclerosis 142, 1-28. Burrell, A. (1996). Economic Aspects of Milk Production in the EU. Eurostat Statistical Document, Eurostat, Luxembourg. Chin, S.E, Liu, W., Storkson, J.M., Ha, Y.L. and Pariza, M.W. (1992). Dietary sources of conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, a newly recognised class of anticarcinogens. J. Food Cornp. Anal. 5,185-197. Dreizen, S., Dreizen, J.G. and Stone, R.E. (1961). The effect of cow's milk on dental caries in the rat. J. Dent. Res. 40, 1025-1028. Edgar, W.M., Bowen, W.H., Amsbaugh, S., Monell-Torrens, E. and Brunelle, J. (1982). Effects of different eating patterns on dental caries in the rat. Caries Res. 16, 384-389. FAO Food Balance Sheets (1995-1999). http://apps.fao.org. Fitzgerald, R.J. and Meisel, H. (2003). Milk protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides, in, Advanced Dairy Chemistry, Vol. 1, Proteins, Fox, RE and McSweeney, P.L.H., eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. pp. 675-697. Fritsche, J. and Steinhart, H. (1998). Amounts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in German foods and evaluation of daily intake. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 206, 77-82. Gedalia, I., Ionat-Bendat, D., Ben-Mosheh, S. and Shapira, L. (1991). Tooth enamel softening with a cola type drink and rehardening with hard cheese or stimulated saliva. J. Oral. Rehabil. 18, 501-506. Gobbetti, M., Stepaniak, L., DeAngelis, M., Corsetti, A. and Di Cagno, R. (2002). Latent bioactive peptides in milk proteins: proteolytic activation and significance in dairy processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 42,223-239. Guggenheim, B., Schmid, R. and Aeschlimann, J.M. (1999). Powdered milk micellar casein prevents oral colonization by Streptococcus sobrinus and dental caries in rats: a basis for the caries-protective effect of dairy products. Caries Res. 33,446-454. Ha, Y.L., Grimm, N.K. and Pariza, M.W. (1987). Anticarcinogens from fried ground beef: heat-altered derivatives of linoleic acid. Carcinogenesis 8, 1881-1887.
580
Nutritional Aspects of Cheese
Ha, Y.L., Storkson, J. and Pariza, M.W. (1990). Inhibition of benzo[alpyrene-induced mouse forestomach neoplasia by conjugated dienoic derivatives of linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 50, 1097-1101. Harper, D.S., Osborn, J.C. and Clayton, R. (1983). Cariostatic potential of four cheeses evaluated in a programmedfed rat model. J. Dent. Res. 62, 283 (abstr.). Harper, D.S., Osborn, J.C., Clayton, R. and Hefferren, J.J. (1987). Modification of food cariogenicity in rats by mineral-rich concentrates from milk. J. Dent. Res. 66, 42-45. Hayes, K.C., Pronczuk, A., Lindsey, S. and Diersen-Schade, D. (1991). Dietary saturated fatty acids differ in their impact on plasma cholesterol and lipoproteins in non-human primates. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 491-498. Heaney, R.P. (1991). Evaluation of Publically Available Scientific Evidence Regarding Nutrient-Disease Relationships. 3. Calcium and Osteoporosis. Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Rockville Pike, MD. Herod, E.L. (1991). The effect of cheese on dental caries. Aust. DentalJ. 36, 120-125. Holland, B., Unwin, I.D. and Buss, D.H. (1989). Milk Products and Eggs: The Fourth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th edn, Royal Society of Chemistry/Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Cambridge, UK. Imfeld, T.H., Hirsch, R.S. and Muhlmann, H.R. (1978). Telemetric recordings of interdental plaque pH during different meal patterns. Br. Dent. J. 139,351-356. Ip, C., Chin, S.E, Scimeca, J.A. and Pariza, M.W. (1991). Mammary cancer prevention by conjugated dienoic derivatives of linoleic acid. Cancer Res. 51, 6118-6124. Jenkins, G.N. and Ferguson, D.B. (1966). Milk and dental caries. Br. Dent. J. 120, 472-477. Jenkins, G.N. and Hargreaves, J.A. (1989). Effect of eating cheese on Ca and P concentrations of whole mouth saliva and plaque. Caries Res. 23, 159-164. Jenkins, G.N. and Harper, D.S. (1983). Protective effect of different cheeses in an in vitro demineralization system. J. Dent. Res. 62,284 (abstr.). Jensen, M.E. and Wefel, J.S. (1990). Effects of processed cheese on human plaque pH and demineralization and remineralization. Am. J. Dent. 3,217-223. Jiang, J., Bjorck, L. and Fonden, R. (1997). Conjugated linoleic acid in Swedish dairy products with special reference to manufacture of hard cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 7, 863-867. Kashket, S. and DePaola, D.P. (2002). Cheese consumption and the development and progression of dental caries. Nutr. Rev. 60, 97-103. Keys, A. (1984). Serum cholesterol response to dietary cholesterol. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 40,351-359. Kim, H.D., Lee, J.H., Shin, Z.I., Man, H.S. and Woo, H.J. (1995). Anticancer effects of hydrophobic peptides derived from a cheese slurry. Food Biotechnol. 4, 268-272. Krobicka, A., Bowen, W.H., Pearson, S. and Young, D.A. (1987). The effects of cheese snacks on caries in desalivated rats.J. Dent. Res. 66, 1116-1119.
Lee, K.N., Kritschevsky, D. and Pariza, M.W. (1994). Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 118, 19-25. Leonarduzzi, G., Sottero, B. and Poli, G. (2002). Oxidized products of cholesterol: dietary and metabolic origin and proatherosclerotic effects (review). J. Nutr. Biochem. 13, 700-710. Lin, H., Boylston, T.D., Chang, M.L., Luedecke, L.O. and Shultz, T.D. (1995). Survey of the conjugated linoleic acid contents of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 2358-2365. Ma, D.W.L., Wierzbicki, A.A., Field, C.J. and Clandinin, M.T. (1999). Conjugated linoleic acid in Canadian dairy and beef products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 1956-1960. MacDonald, H.B. (2000). Conjugated linoleic acid and disease prevention: a review of current knowledge. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 19, 111S-118S. McNamara, D.J. (1987). Effects of fat-modified diets on cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 7, 273-290. Meisel, H. (1993). Casokinins as inhibitors of angiotensinconverting-enzyme, in, New Perspectives in Infant Nutrition, Sawatzki, G. and Renner, B., eds., Thieme, Stuttgart. pp. 153-159. Meisel, H. (1998). Overview on milk protein-derived peptides. Int. Dairy J. 8,363-373. Meisel, H., Goepfert, A. and Gunther, S. (1997). ACE inhibitory activities in milk products. Milchwissenschaft 52,307-311. Morrissey, R.B., Burkholder, B.D. and Tarka, S.M. (1984). The cariogenic potential of several snack foods. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 109,589-591. Moss, M. and Freed, D. (2003). The cow and the coronary: epidemiology, biochemistry and immunology. Int. J. Cardiol. 87,203-216. Mougios, V., Matsakas, A., Petridou, A., Ring, S., Sagredos, A., Melissopoulou, A., Tsigilis, N. and Nicolaidis, M. (2001). Effect of supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid on human serum lipids and body fat. J. Nutr. Biochem. I2, 585-594. Moynihan, P.J., Ferrier, S. and Jenkins, G.N. (1999). Carlostatic potential of cheese: cooked cheese-containing meals increase plaque calcium concentration. Br. Dent. J. 187, 664-667. Norat, T. and Riboli, E. (2003). Dairy products and colorectal cancer: a review of possible mechanism and epidemiological evidence. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 1-17. O'Brierl, N.M. and O'Connor, T.P. (1993). Milk, cheese and dental caries. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 46, 46-49. Olson, N.E and Johnson, M.E. (1990). Light cheese products: characteristics and economics. Food Technol. 44 (10), 93-96. Pappas, A.S., Joshi, A. and Palmer, C.A. (1995a). Relationship of diet to root caries. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61,423S-429S. Pappas, A.S., Joshi, A. and Belanger, A.J. (1995b). Dietary models for root caries. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61,417S-422S. Pihlanto-Leppala, A. (2002). Bioactive peptides, in, Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Roginski, H., Fuquay, J.W. and Fox, P.F., eds., Academic Press, London. pp. 1960-1967.
Nutritional Aspects of Cheese
Recker, R.R., Bammi, A., Barger-Lux, M.J. and Heaney, R.R (1988). Calcium absorbability from milk products, an imitation milk and calcium carbonate. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 47, 93-95. Renner, E. (1987). Nutritional aspects of cheese, in, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Vol. 1, General Aspects, Fox, RE, ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 345-363. Reynolds, E.C. (1997). Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. J. Dent. Res. 76, 1587-1595. Reynolds, E.C. and Black, C.L. (1987). Reduction of chocolate's cariogenicity by supplementation with sodium caseinate. Caries Res. 21,445-451. Reynolds, E.C. and del Rio, A. (1984). Effect of casein and whey protein solutions on caries experience and feeding patterns of the rat. Arch. Oral Biol. 29,927-933. Reynolds, E.C. and Johnson, I.H. (1981). Effect of milk on caries incidence and bacterial composition of dental plaque in the rat. Arch. Oral Biol. 26,445-451. Reynolds, E.C., Black, C.L. and Cai, E (1999). Advances in enamel remineralization: casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. J. Clin. Dent. 10, 86-88. Rosen, S., Min, D.B., Harper, D.S., Harper, W.J., Beck, E.X. and Beck, EM. (1984). Effect of cheese, with or without sucrose, on dental caries and recovery of Streptococcus mutans in rats. J. Dent. Res. 63,894-896. Rugg-Gunn, A.J., Edgar, W.M., Geddes, D.A.M. and Jenkins, G.N. (1975). The effect of different meal patterns upon plaque pH in human subjects. Br. Dent. J. 139, 351-356. Sela, M., Gedalia, I. and Shah, L. (1994). Enamel rehardening with cheese in irradiated patients. Am. J. Dent. 7, 134-136. Shaw, J.H., Ensfield, B.J. and Vv~ollman, D.H. (1959). Studies on the relation of dairy products to dental caries in caries-susceptible rats. J. Nutr. 67, 253-273. Silva, M.D. de A., Jenkins, G.N., Burgess, R.C. and Sandham, H.J. (1986). Effect of cheese on experimental caries in human subjects. Caries Res. 20, 263-269. Silva, M.E de A., Burgess, R.C., Sandham, H.J. and Jenkins, G.N. (1987). Effects of water-soluble components of cheese on experimental caries in humans. J. Dent. Res. 66, 38-41. Smacchi, E. and Gobbetti, M. (1998). Peptides from several Italian cheeses inhibitory to proteolytic enzymes of lactic
581
acid bacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescenes ATCC948 and to the angiotensin I-converting enzyme. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 22,687-694. Stanton, C. and Devery, R. (2002). Formation and content of cholesterol oxidation products in milk and dairy products, in, Cholesterol and Phytosterol Oxidation Products: Analysis, Occurrence and Biological Effects, Guardiola, E, Dutta, R C., Codony, R. and Savage, G.R, eds., AOCS Press, Champaign, IL. pp. 147-161. Stepaniak, L., Fox, RE, Sorhaug, T. and Grabska, J.J. (1995). Effect of peptides from the sequence 58-72 of [3-casein on the activity of endopeptidase, aminopeptidase and X-proplyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase from Lactococcus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43,849-853. Surgeon General (2000). Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD. Vacca-Smith, A.M., Wuyckhuyse, B.C., Tabak, L.A. and Bowen, W.H. (1994). The effect of milk and casein proteins on the adherence of Streptococcus mutans to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Arch. Oral Biol. 39, 1063-1068. Voorrips, L.E., Brants, H.A.M., Kardinaal, A.EM., Hiddink, G.J., van den Brandt, RA. and Goldbohm, R.A. (2002). Intake of conjugated linoleic acid, fat, and other fatty acids in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer: the Netherlands Cohort Study on Diet and Cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 873-882. Weiss, M.E. and Bibby, B.G. (1966). Effects of milk on enamel solubility. Arch. Oral Biol. 11, 49-57. Zhang, D. arid Mahoney, A.W. (1989a). Effect of iron fortification on quality of Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 322-332. Zhang, D. and Mahoney, A.W. (1989b). Bioavailability of iron-milk protein complexes and fortified Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 2845-2855. Zhang, D. and Mahoney, A.W. (1990). Effect of iron fortification on Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 2252-2258. Zhang, D. and Mahoney, A.W. (1991). Iron fortification of process Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 74,353-358. Zlatanos, S., Laskaridis, K., Feist, C. and Zagredos, A. (2002). CLA content and fatty acid composition of Greek Feta and hard cheeses. Food Chem. 78,471-477.
Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese P.F. Fox, Department of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition, University College, Ireland T.M. Cogan, Dairy Products Research Centre, Teagasc, Fermoy, Ireland
Introduction As discussed in 'Cheese: An Overview', Volume 1 and 'Diversity of Cheese Varieties: an Overview', Volume 2, the manufacture of cheese exploits either of two properties of the casein system: precipitation/coagulation at the isoelectric pH (4.6), which is exploited in the production of fresh, acid-coagulated cheeses ( - 2 5 % of total cheese production), or by limited proteolysis using rennets which specifically hydrolyse the micellestabilizing protein, K-casein, following which the rennetaltered micelles coagulate in the presence of Ca 2+ at a temperature > 2 0 ~ usually 3 0 - 3 5 ~ ( ' 7 5 % of cheese production). Most acid-coagulated cheeses are consumed fresh (unripened) whereas the vast majority of rennet-coagulated cheeses are ripened for a period ranging from - 3 weeks to > 2 years. Although there are recognizable differences between the unripened curds for different cheeses, mainly with respect to moisture content and texture, the characteristic differences between the 1000 or so varieties of cheese develop during ripening. The quality of acid-coagulated cheeses is subject to some variation but the fact that they are consumed fresh and that no modifications are required after manufacture, makes them relatively easy to produce with consistent quality (see 'Formation, Structural Properties and Rheology of Acid-coagulated Milk Gels', Volume 1 and 'Acid- and Acid-Rennet-Curd Cheeses: Part A Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties', Volume 2). In contrast, the characteristic quality of rennet-coagulated cheeses develops mainly during ripening and frequently depends on the growth of a secondary microflora, which are not readily reproducible. During ripening, a complex array of microbiological, biochemical and chemical reactions occur and therefore there are many opportunities for problems to develop. In this chapter, the quality aspects of rennet-coagulated cheeses will be considered. Some of the principal areas of cheese science through which cheese quality can be improved through research will be discussed. Cheese is the quintessential convenience f o o d - it can be consumed as it is without preparation, can be
used as a sandwich filler, grated or diced and used as a condiment or as a component of several cooked dishes. At least 50% of cheese is used, at home or in the factory, as an ingredient or component of other foods. The principal applications of cheese as an ingredient are discussed in 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2. The use of cheese as a food ingredient is increasing and for many of these applications, the principal criterion of quality depends on the functionality of the cheese, which depends mainly on the physico-chemical properties of the proteins. When used as an ingredient in food applications, cheese is expected to perform one or more functions and there is considerable commercial interest in producing cheese products with functional properties tailor-made for particular applications. Cheese may be used as an ingredient in several forms: 9 natural cheese: sliced, diced or grated; 9 processed cheese products; 9 dried cheese products: - dried, grated natural cheese (a traditional product); - cheese powders. 9 enzyme-modified cheese products, which may be produced from mild cheese or fresh cheese curd or from blends of enzyme-treated casein and fats and are used mainly as high-intensity cheese flavours. There are several aspects to the quality of cheese; some are applicable to all cheese products and applications, others are significant for specific cheeses. Probably the most important aspects of cheese are: 9 9 9 9 9 9
safety from a public health viewpoint nutritional flavour texture functionality appearance, e.g., - Cheese must conform to the expected characteristics of the variety. There are obvious differences between the principal families of cheese but it may not be so easy to differentiate between cheeses claimed to
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 1: General Aspects ISBN: 0-1226-3652-X Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
584
Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese
belong to similar varieties, e.g., Gouda and Edam, Cheddar and Gloucester, Brie and Camembert. The borderlines are blurred and within each variety, a certain degree of variability is tolerated and acceptable. - Reproducibility/reliability - consumers expect that a product will be reproducible and consistent between batches and over time with respect to flavour, texture, appearance and functionality, especially for the principal, 'mass-produced' varieties; some variability is tolerated, perhaps even expected, in artisanal cheeses.
Milk Selection Pre-treatment Standardization
Cheesemilk Addition of: starter culture (acidification) colour (optional) CaCI2 (optional) Coagulation [rennet or acid (produced in situ or pre-formed) or heat/acid]
Production of Rennet-Coagulated Cheese The production of rennet-coagulated cheese can be divided into two phases:
Coagulum (gel) Cut coagulum Stir Heat Acidification (rennet-coagulated cheeses) Separation of curds from whey
9 Conversion of milk to curd 9 Conversion of curd to cheese The key operations are summarized in Fig. 1. The production of good-quality cheese depends on a good milk supply from the chemical and microbiological viewpoints. Raw milk is a rather variable commodity and is subjected to a range of processes aimed at modifying, standardizing and optimizing the cheesemaking properties of milk. Given a good milk supply, the first objective is to produce curd of the desired chemical composition with the desired microflora. Unless these criteria are met, the curd will not evolve into cheese with the characteristic flavour, texture and functionality during ripening. The ripening of cheese, and hence its quality, is due to the activity of micro-organisms and enzymes from four or five sources: 9 9 9 9 9
Milk Rennet Primary starter Secondary cultures Adventitious (non-starter) bacteria
It is reasonable to expect that it should be possible to produce premium-quality cheese consistently by controlling these agents; however, in spite of considerable research and quality control efforts, it is not yet possible to do so. A very wide and diverse range of factors interact to affect the composition of cheese curd and hence the quality of the final cheese; an attempt to summarize these is shown in Fig. 2, which follows the same sequence as Fig. 1. Some of these factors/agents can be manipulated easily and precisely while others are more difficult, or perhaps impossible, to control. Indeed, the precise influence of many of the factors included
Curds Acidification Special operations (e.g., cheddaring, stretching) Salting (some varieties) Moulding Pressing (some varieties)
Fresh cheese
~
Salting (most varieties) Ripening (most rennet-coagulated cheeses)
Mature cheese Figure 1 General protocol for cheese manufacture (from Fox et al., 2000).
in Fig. 2 on cheese ripening and quality are not known precisely and many of the factors are interactive. It is possible to apply the principles of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) analysis to cheese production and it is hoped that this article may stimulate efforts to apply HACCP principles to cheesemaking. The principal items in Fig. 1 and 2 will be discussed individually in the following sections.
Milk Supply It is well recognized that the quality of the milk supply has a major impact on the quality and consistency of the resultant cheese. Three aspects of quality must be considered: microbiological, enzymatic and chemical.
Species Breed Stage of lactation Plane of nutrition Animal health
Composition cell c o u n t
\ RAW MILK I--~-[ Public health and safety ', ' ,
On-farm jr hygiene Transport
1temperature
Thermization I Standardization-~[-~Pasteurization
I CREESE MILK I
In-factory L time
natural creaming centrifugal milk powder UF
Selection criteria Acid production Phage sensitivity Ripening properties Rate of lysis
Colour CaCI2 GDL Starter culture Secondary/adjunct culture
Gel strength subjective/objective assessment I - cheese yield - curd ~omposition
I COA~~~~jn;t I ~Cut ~
~
I C U R D S /IW H_E Y
Cheese quality
-
Acidification-
~
~ - cheese yield - curd composition
. -
{- curd syneresis curd composition - acidification retention of coagulant
Cook~ - syneresis 1 curd composition I curd structure ~, retention of coagulantI solubilization of CCP .J
Composition - casein - fat - calcium - pH - enzymes
Agitate
~ c u r d syneresis curd composiiton
Whey I CUI I D S I - Acidification Dehydration Texturization? Salting? Moulding Pressing? i
I s ~ ~--Rennet Milk enzyme StarterenzYmes Secondary culture Adventitious ~__
I
I- Salting ~- Special secondary cultures -
Coating/packaging~
, ~RIPENING I ~ //~ I - Composition - Temperature - Humidity - Time
Proteolysis Lipolysis j - Glycolysis - Secondary changes J MATURE CHEESE I -
pH ~Fat
~
Cl
)
Flavour
Texture ~ "
Functional properties
Figure 2 Interaction of compositional and technological factors that affect the quality of cheese. 585
586
Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese
Microbiological
Three aspects of the microbiology of cheese milk are of interest/concern: 9 Public health 9 Off-flavours and spoilage 9 Desirable bacteria
Public health aspects As a product of animal origin, milk may become contaminated with pathogenic micro-organisms, and this, clearly, is of great concern. Previously, the principal pathogens of concern in milk were Mycobacterium boris and Brucella abortus, but in developed dairying countries today, these pathogens have been largely or entirely eliminated from the dairy herd. Today, a wide range of pathogens are of concern, mainly Listeria monocytogenes, enterotoxigenic strains of E. coli, e.g., E. coli O157 H7, Shigella, Erwinia, Campylobacter, Staphlyococcus, Salmonella spp. and M. paratuberculosis. Many of these micro-organisms do not grow in milk which simply acts as a vector. In cheese, these pathogens die off under the rather hostile conditions in well-made cheese which has a relatively low pH (5.3), a relatively high salt content (5-10% sah-inmoisture; S/M) and perhaps bacteriocins. For this reason, Public Health Authorities in many counties require that cheese made from raw milk be aged for 60 days, although this practice may not be fully effective. Alternatively, cheese must be made from pasteurized milk or the cheese itself must be pasteurized, as in processed cheese. Cheese, the pH of which does not decrease at the desired rate or to the desired extent during manufacture (e.g., due to bacteriophage infection or contamination with antibiotics) or if the pH increases substantially during ripening, e.g., surface mould- or smear-ripened cheese, are most at risk. High-moisture, fast-ripening cheeses are at a greater risk of harbouring pathogens than low-moisture, slowripening varieties. A considerable amount of cheese is made from raw milk, especially in France, Germany and southern European countries, but there is increasing pressure in northern Europe and North America to produce all cheese from pasteurized milk. There have been very few reported outbreaks of food poisoning from the consumption of raw milk hard, long-ripened cheese varieties. In all outbreaks for which adequate data are available, mitigating circumstances, e.g., lack of a starter culture or poor starter activity, have also been involved. Clearly, raw milk cheese is safe if adequate precautions are taken. However, it should be remembered that most raw milk cheeses are high-cooked, hard
or extra-hard v a r i e t i e s - many of these cheeses, e.g., Parmigiano Reggiano, Grana Padano, Swiss Emmental and Gruyere de Comte, are cooked at --~55 ~ the cooked curds are transferred while hot to moulds with a capacity of 20-60 kg curd and consequently, the curds cool s l o w l y - most of these 'raw milk' cheeses are in fact pasteurized, as indicated by a negative alkaline phosphatase test. High-moisture, raw-milk cheeses are of more concern but most of these have a low initial pH (4.6) and appear to be safe. It is probably significant that raw-milk cheeses are made on a small/very small scale from very fresh milk from healthy cows. For further discussion on pathogens in cheese, see 'Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese', Volume 1. It is unlikely that it will be possible to produce raw milk guaranteed free of pathogenic bacteria. However, milk with very low numbers of pathogens can be produced from healthy animals and any pathogens that do enter milk can be: 9 killed (pasteurization or novel alternatives); 9 removed (bactofugation or microfihration (MF); see 'Application of Membrane Separation Technology to Cheese Production', Volume 1); 9 prevented from growing or killed, e.g., by use of low pH, selected bacteriocin-producing starters. To date, efforts to remove pathogens from cheese milk have concentrated on adequate pasteurization. There is ongoing research on alternative methods and it is likely that work in this area will continue and probably expand. Off-flavours and spoilage A second beneficial effect of pasteurization is the killing of spoilage micro-organisms, e.g., coliforms, pseudomonads and yeasts. In countries with a developed dairy industry, the quality of the milk supply has improved markedly during the past 30 y e a r s - total bacterial counts (TBC) are now usually 20 ~ (in cheesemaking, at 30-35 ~ It has been proposed (Andreeva et al., 1992; Gustchina et al., 1996) that chymosin normally exists in an inactive conformation but is activated when the substrate binds in the active site cleft of the enzyme. It has been suggested that the sequence--H.P.H.P.HB (residues 98-102 of K-casein) is responsible for this conformational change. This sequence occurs in the K-casein of cow, goat, sheep and buffalo but not in the K-casein of the mare, camel, pig, rat or human, in which the corresponding sequence is ..HPRPH.., ..RPRPR.., ..RPRPH.., ..HPINR. and ..RPNLH.., respectively (Iametti et al., 2001; Martin etal., 2003). Therefore, one would expect that calf chymosin would not coagulate the milk of the mare, camel, pig, human or rat. There have been few studies on the coagulation of non-bovine milk by calf chymosin. The commercial use of calf rennet in cheesemaking from sheep, goat or buffalo milk indicates that calf chymosin can hydrolyse the K-casein in these milks, as expected from the above hypothesis. Calf chymosin can also coagulate porcine milk (Fox, 1975b); in fact, porcine milk is coagulated by calf rennet at 4 ~ whereas bovine milk is not, due to the nature of the non-enzymatic secondary phase. Some investigators have reported that camel milk is not coagulated by calf rennet but Farah (1993) reported that it is coagulated slowly to a weak gel. The status of mares' milk with respect to K-casein remained unclear until very recently. Ochirkhuyag et al. (2000) reported that equine milk does not contain K-casein and that the micelle-stabilizing function is played by [3-casein; however, Malacarne et al. (2002) reported that it contains a low level (20 ~ this is referred to as the secondary phase of rennet coagulation. Renneted bovine milk does not coagulate 6.5. Low-cooked, low-pH, highmoisture cheese, e.g., Camembert, retains ---30% of the added chymosin activity; Cheddar retains "--6% and Emmental "--0%. Everything else being equal, increased retention of the coagulant in cheese curd results in greater initial hydrolysis of C~sl-casein; however, the significance of this variable on the flavour and texture of cheese has not been studied thoroughly. It has been suggested that the activity of chymosin in cheese curd is the limiting factor in cheese ripening; however, excessive rennet activity leads to bitterness. Proteolysis in cheese during ripening is discussed later; there have been relatively few studies on the significance of chymosin activity to cheese quality, an aspect which appears to warrant further research. Considering the importance of proteolysis in the ripening and quality of cheese and the significance of the coagulant thereto, studies on various factors that affect the retention of the coagulant in cheese curd appear warranted, e.g., 9 the adsorption of chymosin on casein micelles and the apparent lack of adsorption of fungal proteinases; 9 stability of various rennets under various conditions of temperature, pH and other factors.
Starter The second key reaction in cheesemaking is acidificat i o n - the pH of all rennet-coagulated cheeses should decrease to a value in the range 4.6-5.2 within a few
days of manufacture, or in some varieties, at the end of curd manufacture (5-6 h). Acidification at the appropriate rate and time is an essential and characteristic feature of cheesemaking- it is, in fact, a sine qua non. Among the important consequences of acidification are: 9 activity of the coagulant; 9 survival and retention of coagulant in the curd; 9 firmness of the coagulum, which affects the loss of fat and protein in the whey on cutting and hence reduces the yield of cheese; 9 syneresis of the curds and hence the composition of the cheese; 9 solubilization of colloidal calcium phosphate (CCP), which has a major effect on the texture, meltability and stretchability of the cheese; 9 inhibition of the growth of undesirable bacteria, most importantly pathogenic and food poisoning bacteria; 9 the activity of various enzymes in the cheese during ripening and consequently the rate of ripening and the quality of the cheese. Originally, acidification was due to the production of lactic acid from lactose by adventitious LAB. Acidification of some cheese varieties still depends on the activity of the adventitious microflora but most cheeses now are acidified using selected LAB added to the cheesemilk as a culture (starter). The idea of using starter cultures was introduced in ---1870 in Denmark. The cultures used today in cheesemaking can be divided into two groups: 1. Mesophilic - with an optimum growth temperature of "- 28 ~ 2. Thermophilic- which grow optimally at --~42 ~ Mesophilic cultures are used for cheese curds which are cooked at a temperature 1.4%
Premium quality
MNFS 52-56% MNFS 50-57%
S/M 4.0-6.0% S/M 4.0--6.0%
Gilles and Lawrence (1973) Composition of cheeses was determined at 14 days and related to quality of mature Cheddar cheese.
Moisture < 38%
pH < 5.4
l Fox (1975a) Relationship between the quality and composition ._o!10-week-old Cheddar cheese.
MNFS 52-54%
S/M 4.2-5.2%
Pearce and Gilles (1979) Composition of cheeses was determined at 14 days and related to quality of Cheddar cheese.
Figure 6 Relationships between composition (determined at various stages during ripening) and the quality of mature Cheddar cheese (moisture-in-non-fat substances (MNFS) fat-in-dry-matter (FDM), and salt-in-moisture (S/M)).
604
Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese
O'Connor (1971) found that the flavour, texture and total score of Cheddar were significantly correlated with % NaC1 and particularly with pH; moisture content had less effect on cheese quality. Salt content and pH were strongly correlated with each other, as were salt and moisture. Based on the results of a study on experimental and commercial cheeses in New Zealand, Gilles and Lawrence (1973) proposed a grading (selection) scheme which has since been applied commercially in New Zealand to young (14 day) Cheddar cheese. The standards prescribed for Premium grade cheese were: pH: 4.95-5.10; % S/M: 4.0-6.0%; MNFS: 52-56%; FDM: 52-55%. The corresponding values for First Grade cheeses were: 4.85-5.20%, 2.5-6%, 50-57% and 50-56%; young cheeses with a composition outside these ranges were considered unlikely to yield goodquality mature cheese. Quite wide ranges of FDM are acceptable; Lawrence and Gilles (1980) suggested that since relatively little lipolysis occurs in Cheddar cheese, fat content plays a minor role in determining cheese quality but if FDM is below about 48%, the cheese is noticeably more firm and less attractive in flavour. Pearce and Gilles (1979) reported that the grade of young (14-day-old) cheeses produced at the New Zealand Dairy Research Institute was most highly correlated with moisture content; the optimum compositional ranges were: MNFS: 52-54%; S/M: 4.2-5.2%; pH: 4.95-5.15. Fox (1975a,b) reported a weak correlation between grade and moisture, salt and pH for Irish Cheddar cheeses but a high percentage of cheeses with compositional extremes was downgraded, especially those with low salt (38%) or high pH (>5.4). Salt concentration seemed to exercise the strongest influence on cheese quality and the lowest percentage of down-graded cheeses can be expected in the salt range 1.6-1.8% (S/M: 4.0-4.9%); apart from the upper extremes, pH and moisture had little influence on quality in the sample studied. High salt levels tend to cause a curdy texture, probably due to insufficient proteolysis; a pasty body, often accompanied by off-flavours, is associated with low salt and high moisture levels. In the same study, the composition of extra-mature Cheddar cheeses was found to vary less and the mean moisture content was 1% lower than that of regular cheeses. A very extensive study of the relationship between the composition and quality of nearly 10 000 cheeses produced at five commercial New Zealand factories was reported by Lelievre and Gilles (1982). As in previous studies, considerable compositional variation was evident but was less for some factories than others. While the precise relationship between quality
and composition varied between plants, certain generalizations emerged: 9 within the compositional range suggested by Gilles and Lawrence (1973) for 'premium' quality cheese, composition does not have a decisive influence on grade, which decreases outside this range; 9 composition alone does not provide an exclusive basis for grading; 9 MNFS was again found to be the principal factor affecting quality; 9 within the recommended compositional bands, grades declined marginally as MNFS increased from 51 to 55% and increased slightly as S/M decreased from 6 to 4; pH had no consistent effect within the range 4.9-5.2 and FDM had no influence in the range 50-57%. 9 there were specific intra-plant relationships between grade and composition; therefore, each plant should determine the optimum compositional parameters pertinent to it. The results of the foregoing investigations indicate that high values for moisture and pH and a low salt content lead to flavour and textural defects. The desired ranges suggested by Gilles and Lawrence (1973) appear to be reasonable, at least for New Zealand conditions, but within the prescribed zones, composition is not a good predictor of Cheddar cheese quality. Presumably, several other factors, e.g., starter, NSLAB, activity of indigenous milk enzymes, relatively small variations in cheese composition and probably other unknown factors, influence cheese quality but become dominant only under conditions where the principal determinants, moisture, salt and pH, are within appropriate limits. Although the role of calcium concentration in cheese quality has received occasional mention, its significance has been largely overlooked. Lawrence and Gilles (1980) pointed out that the concentration of calcium in cheese curd determines the cheese matrix and, together with pH, indicates whether proper procedures were used to manufacture a specific cheese variety. As the pH decreases during cheese manufacture, CCP dissolves and is removed in the whey. The whey removed after cooking comprises 90-95% of the total whey expressed during cheesemaking and under normal conditions contains ---85% of the calcium and "--90% of the phosphorus lost from the cheese curd. Thus, the calcium content of cheese reflects the pH of the curd at whey drainage; there are strong correlations between the calcium content of cheese and the pH at 1 or 14 days and the amount of starter used (see Lawrence et al., 1984). Since the pH of cheese increases during ripening, the pH of mature
Factors that Affect the Quality of Cheese 605 cheese may be a poor index of the pH of the young cheese. Therefore, calcium concentration is probably a better record of the history of a cheese with respect to the rate of acidification than the final pH. Reduction in calcium phosphate concentration by excessively rapid acid development also reduces the buffering capacity of cheese and hence the pH of the curd will fall to a lower value for any particular level of acid production. No recent work on the level and significance of calcium in Cheddar cheese appears to be available. The calcium content of cheese has a major effect on its meltability and stretchability, e.g., pasta-filata cheese does not stretch well, or not at all, until the pH falls below ---5.4. Biologically acidified Mozzarella has poor stretchability and meltability immediately after manufacture but these properties improve during the early stages of ripening and are optimal after about 2-3 weeks; functionality deteriorates on continued ripening due to proteolysis. In contrast, directly acidified cheese is functional immediately after manufacture. The difference in behaviour is due to the lower calcium concentration in the directly acidified cheese owing to the faster decline in pH to ---5.6. Under such conditions, much of the CCP dissolves and is removed in the whey at drainage; the concentration of calcium per unit of protein, which is very important for cheese functionality, in biologically and chemically acidified Mozzarella cheese was 27.7 and 21.8 mg/g, respectively (Guinee et al., 2002). There is little published information on the relationships between composition and quality for other cheese varieties. However, it is very likely that similar factors affect the quality of all cheeses more or less to the same extent.
Ripening T e m p e r a t u r e Ripening temperature has a major influence on the rate of ripening and quality of cheese. Traditionally, cheese was ripened in caves or cellars at a relatively constant temperature. This practice is still widespread for some varieties but artificially refrigerated rooms are now used by large-scale manufacture. The ripening temperature is fairly characteristic of the variety, e.g., Cheddar, 6-8 ~ Gouda, 12-14 ~ ParmigianoReggiano, 18-20 ~ Emmental, 6 ~ for ---2 weeks, then at 22 ~ for 4-6 weeks to allow the propionic acid bacteria to grow rapidly and produce adequate CO2 for good eye development, then at ---4 ~ for several months to complete ripening; Camembert, 14 ~ for --~2 weeks to induce the growth of P. camemberti, then at 4 ~ for 2-4 weeks.
Ripening can be accelerated by increasing the ripening temperature but all reactions, desirable and undesirable, are accelerated and an unbalanced flavour or off-flavour may develop. Ripening at an elevated temperature is normally considered with the objective of accelerating ripening (see Fox et al., 1996b). Cheese flavour can probably be modified by manipulating temperature; however, this is rarely practised except for Swiss-type cheeses. The rate at which the curd is cooled after moulding has a major effect on the growth of starter LAB and NSLAB. The curds for most cheeses are moulded immediately after cooking and acidification occurs mainly in the moulds. Hence, the rate at which the curd cools in the moulds has a major effect on starter growth and rate of acid development, and is strongly affected by the size of the cheese and ambient temperature. The effect of cooling on starter growth is particularly noticeable for high-cooked cheeses, e.g., Swiss and Grana types. The thermophilic starters used for these cheeses do not grow at the cook temperature but begin to grow as the curd cools in the moulds. For consistency, it is important to control the ambient temperature. For Cheddar-type cheeses, acidification is almost complete at moulding. Traditionally, the moulded cheeses were pressed overnight at ambient temperature and the cheeses cooled close to ambient during this period, although ambient temperature probably varied significantly with season. In modern practice, the cheeses exit the Wincanton tower at ---36 ~ and are packaged and stacked on pallets (5 • 10 cheeses ---1 tonne) and transferred to ripening rooms. The cheeses at the centre of the pallet do not decrease to ambient (store) temperature for about 4 weeks and this causes considerable variation in the number and probably the type of NSLAB, and hence in the quality of the cheese. Many factories now cool the packaged cheese in a cooling tunnel overnight before stacking on pallets. If the cheese is cooled to " & 2 - r
=
,,
~ :~
,._- "5 ~ 0
::3 0
o
OE
> ~
,, = ~ - ~
-
"
~ ="~ ,,
~
~ .,_
C
~-
.,--=~
o
oo
._ =
- o --~ o . . ~ . , . ':'D~ ~
"o
~
"o
>,-~-~
~ ~ ~, >o~ ~
E=
#E a_
Eo
.e
-- ~
= oo
b :s
I 0 4--
,~ c 0) ,~,~
,~ 'u
o
_~5
> ~
c
~ -"o c~
'-'
E
-
o
0 4--
E 0
6
UJ
.C:
0
0
13..
.c.
m
~ -O
n
W (.5 0
(~
0"7
0
0
0
13::
~
0
.,...,
rj')
I-
0
"o
ffJ
Li_
,L
I.--
I
= .,_ E 9 e0
>,
"-
"0
or
~.~ o ~ = ooe0
o'5
, ~ oE co
~ C ~ mc ~ = 5o ~ "= ~ :~
~ "G o
e u
E o
6
Diversity of Cheese Varieties: An Overview
Classification scheme for cheeses according to Walter and Hargrove (1972)
1.
Very hard (grating) 1.1 Ripened by bacteria: Asiago (old), Parmesan, Romano, Sapsago, Spalen
2.
Hard
2.1 2.2 3.
Ripened by bacteria, without eyes: Cheddar, Granular, Caciocavallo Ripened by bacteria, with eyes: Emmental, Gruyere
Semi-soft
3.1 3.2
Ripened principally by bacteria: Brick, MC~nster Ripened by bacteria and surface micro-organisms: Limburger, Port du Salut, Trappist 3.3 Ripenedprincipally by blue mould in the interior: Roquefort, Gorgonzola, Danablu, Stilton, Blue Wensleydale
4.
Soft
4.1 Ripened:Bel Paese, Brie, Camembert, Hand, Neufchatel 4.2 Unripened: Cottage, Pot, Baker's, Cream, Ricotta, Mysost, Primost
Volume 2). Cheddar and British territorial varieties (for which the curds are often textured and dry-salted) are classified as hard or semi-hard internal bacterially ripened cheeses ('Cheddar Cheese and Related Drysalted Cheese Varieties', Volume 2). Internal bacterially ripened cheeses with eyes are further sub-divided on the basis of moisture content into hard varieties (e.g., Emmental; 'Cheese with Propionic Acid Fermentation', Volume 2) in which the eyes are formed by CO2 produced on fermentation of lactate by Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp, shermanii or semi-hard (e.g.,
Edam and Gouda; 'Gouda and Related Cheeses', Volume 2) in which a few small eyes develop due to the formation of CO2 by fermentation of citrate by the LAB. Pastafilata cheeses (e.g., Mozzarella; see 'Pasta-Filata Cheeses', Volume 2) are characterized by stretching in hot water which texturizes the curd. White-brined cheeses, including Feta and Domiati ('Cheese Varieties Ripened in Brine', Volume 2), are ripened under brine and have a high salt content and, consequently, they are grouped together as a separate category within the group of internal bacterially ripened cheeses. Soft cheese varieties are usually not included in the group of internal bacterially ripened cheeses because they have a characteristic secondary microflora which has a major effect on the characteristics of these cheeses. Mould-ripened cheeses are subdivided into surface mould-ripened varieties (e.g., Camembert or Brie; 'Surface Mould-ripened Cheeses', Volume 2) in which ripening is characterized by the growth of Penicillium camemberti on the surface, and internal mould-ripened cheeses ('Blue Cheese', Volume 2) in which P. roqueforti grows throughout the cheese. Smear-ripened cheeses ('Bacterial Surface-ripened Cheeses', Volume 2) are characterized by the development of a complex microflora consisting of yeasts and, later, bacteria (particularly coryneforms) on the cheese surface during ripening. The classification scheme of Fox et al. (2000) is not without inconsistencies. For example, cheeses made from the milk of different species are grouped together (e.g., Roquefort and Gorgonzola are both Blue cheeses
Classification of cheese according to source of milk, moisture content, texture and ripening agents* 1.
Cow's milk
1.1
Hard (55%; very low or no scald) Bs or Sm
Bel Paese (I) Maroilles (F)
Sm
Ns
Un, Ac
Brie (F) Camembert (F) Carre d'est (F) Neufchatel (F) Chaource (F)
Colwich (UK) Lactic (UK) Bondon (F)
Coulommier (F) York (UK) Cambridge (UK) Cottage (UK) Quarg Petit Suisse (F) Cream (UK)
Pr, propionic acid bacteria; Ns, normal lactic acid starter of milk flora; Bs, smear coat (Brevibacterium linens and other organisms) Sm, surface mould (R camemberti); Bv, blue-veined internal mould (R roqueforti); Ac, acid-coagulated; Un, normally unripened, fresh cheese. a Modified from Scott (1986).
but the former is made from sheep's milk and the latter from cows' milk). Of course, the scheme can be readily modified by subdividing relevant categories to indicate the type of milk used. The subdivision between hard and semi-hard cheeses is somewhat arbitrary and overlaps. Most varieties lose moisture during ripening by evaporation from the surface, i.e., develop a rind. Several varieties, e.g., Pecorino Romano and Montasio, are consumed after various lengths of ripening and hence may be classified as semi-hard, hard or extra hard, depending on age of cheese at consumption. There is also some cross-over between categories. Gruyere is classified as an internal bacterially ripened
variety with eyes but it is also characterized by the growth of a surface microflora, while some cheeses classified as surface-ripened (e.g., Havarti and Port du Salut) are often produced without a surface microflora and thus are, in effect, soft, internal bacterially ripened varieties. Fox et al. (2000) considered pasta-filata and high-salt varieties as separate families because of their unique technologies (stretching and ripening under brine, respectively) but they are actually ripened by the same agents as other internal bacterially ripened cheeses. However, the scheme of Fox et al. (2000) is a useful basis for classification; the arrangement of topics within this volume largely follows this scheme.
8
D i v e r s i t y of C h e e s e Varieties: A n O v e r v i e w
Major omissions from the scheme of Fox et al. (2000) are processed cheeses, cheese-based products (cheese powders, enzyme-modified cheese), cheese analogues and cheese substitutes. Processed cheese products represent ---14% of world cheese production and thus surpass the production of most natural varieties except Cheddar, Gouda, Mozzarella and Camembert. None of the classification schemes referred to above includes processed cheeses - it would seem reasonable to include them as a separate category. From the discussion in 'Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products', Volume 2, it will be apparent that this is a very diverse group of products with respect to raw material, process technology and composition. One could also argue that each class of the other cheese-based products, which are described in 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2, warrants inclusion and of course this can be accommodated readily. It must be remembered that the dried and enzyme-modified cheeses are very heterogeneous groups. Although cheese analogues may not be considered to be authentic cheese products, there seems to be no
valid reason for their exclusion. They are usually based on dry rennet casein into which lipids and water are emulsified or absorbed, respectively. Their production involves many of the operations used for other types of cheese, e.g., rennet coagulation, cooking, syneresis (as for natural rennet-coagulated cheeses), heating and emulsification, packaging (as for processed cheese). Since they are not ripened, it seems reasonable to classify cheese analogues as 'processed unripened cheese'. The principal among such cheeses at present is analogue pizza cheese. A modified version of the classification scheme of Fox et al. (2000) is shown in Fig. 1, incorporating processed cheese, cheese-derived products and cheese analogues. Probably the most comprehensive classification scheme for cheese developed to date is that of Ottogalli (1998, 2000a,b, 2001) which organizes cheeses into three main groups (indicated by the Latin words: 'Lacticinia' (milk-like), 'Formatica' (shaped), 'Miscellanea' (miscellaneous; Table 7). The Lacticinia group includes products which are produced from milk, cream, whey or
Cheese Analogues
tt
"l
Enzyme-ModifiedCheese
~
~.
Acid-Coagulated
Ricotta
I
Cottage, Cream, Quarg
i
Dried Cheeses
Heat/Acid Coagulation
Cheese
Processed Cheese
Rennet-Coagulated
9
Concentration/CrystallizatiOnMysost
Most varieties of cheese may be processed
Natural Cheese
I Surface-ripened
Mould-ripened
Internal bacterially ripened
Havarti Limburger MOnster Port du Salut Trappist Taleggio Tilsit
I Surface mould
(usually P. camemberti ) Brie Camembert
Internal mould (P. roqueforti) Roquefort Danablu Stilton
Cheeses with eyes Hard Grana Padano Parmesan Asiago Sbrinz
Cheddar Cheshire Graviera Ras
Caerphilly Mahon Monterey Jack
Swiss-type (Lactate metabolism by Propionibacterium spp.) Emmental Gruyere Maasdam
High-salt varieties Domiati Feta
Dutch-type (Eyes caused by citrate metabolism)
Pasta-filata varieties Mozzarella Kashkaval Provolone
Edam Gouda
The diversity of cheese. Cheese varieties are classified into super-families based on the method of coagulation and further sub-divided based on the principal ripening agents and/or characteristic technology (modified from Fox et al., 2000).
Diversity of Cheese Varieties: An Overview
9
Classification of cheeses according to Ottogalli (1998, 2000a,b, 2001)
~5
Farn~
Class
Description
Examples
Yoghurt-like product, but with loss of some whey
Lebneh (Middle East); Fromage Blanc (Switzerland, France); Sauer-milchk&se, Quarg (Germany) Queso Blanco (Latin America); Cottage (UK, USA); Quarg (Germany); Tvorog (Poland) Whey cheese (UK); Ricotta (Italy); Manouri (Former Yugoslavia); Brunost, Getost (Norway) Whey cheese (UK); Ricotta (Italy); Ziger (Germany); Mysost (Norway) Mascarpone (Italy) Skyr (Iceland); Karish (Egypt); Buttermilk Quark (Germany); Aoules (Algeria); Kolostrumkase (Germany); Sa Casada (Italy), Armada (Spain)
Milk coagulated by addition of organic acid
c O. .m
Acid addition and heating of whey (goat or ewe) Acid addition and heating of whey (cow) Acid addition and heating of cream Acid addition and heating of buttermilk
o rL. LL
Acid addition and heating of colostrum or beestings Acid-rennet coagulation I
Rennet-acid coagulation c .m
c O.
I
I
~ c o II
Goat or sheep
~~Fresh-kneaded or plastic or stretched cheeses
r -g .~ gg O.
Coagulum cut into cubes and/or flakes cooked, drained, washed and water cooled Rindless, very short ripening phase Thin rind, short ripening ( ~'~ "~- L_"
Ewes' or goats'
~o~ N
9"~
m ~
~, ..=
~9 E I-r I
E
Untextured, usually semi-cooked and pressed
C 0 (I) "O
~ c(D • II c- ~
Washed curd (eyes caused by citrate metabolism or by heterolactic bacteria) Same as F1 but from goats' or ewes' milk
u~ E - ~ ~ 0 ._0 C~ ~.C_
c
c
9
0
Kneaded curds ('pasta filata') Propionic cheeses. Big round eyes
Textured (and dry salted) curd c- ~ .& E II
(0--
Smeared rind
Buxton Blue, Stilton, Dovedale (UK); Gorgonzola (Italy); Danablu, Mycella (Denmark); Bergader (Germany); Gammelost (Norway); Adelost (Sweden); Bleu d'Auvergne, Bleu de Causses, Bleu de Gex, Bleu de Laqueille, Fourme d'Aubert (France); Cashel Blue (Ireland) Bleu de Bresse (France); Cambozola (Germany) Roquefort (France); Cabrales (Spain); Kopanisti (Greece); Castelmagno, Murianengo (Italy) Montasio, Raschera, Bettelmatt (Italy); Pinzgauer (Austria); Beaumont, Laguiole, Murol (France); Raclette (Switzerland); Trappisten (Germany) Edam, Gouda (The Netherlands); Fontal (Italy); Mimolette (France); Blarney (Ireland) Serra (PR); Orduna, Mahon (Spain); Ossau-lraty (France); Pecorini: Pecorino Toscano, Canestrato (Italy); Altemburger (Germany) Caciocavallo (Italy); Ostwepock, Kasseri (Greece); Oaxaca (Mexico) Maasdamer (The Netherlands); Fol Epi (France); Jarlsberg (Norway); Samsoe (Denmark); Pategras, Colonia (Argentina) Lancashire, Colby (UK). Leiden (The Netherlands), Monterey (USA) Fontina (Italy); Tilsit (Germany); Appenzeller (Swtzerland); Stinking Bishop (UK)
Diversity of Cheese Varieties: An Overview
11
continued
Class
Fam~ c 0 if)
~ c-
c 9
I
9
0
.=
9r-- II E ~- -b- o
~~ -8=8 =o.
Description
Examples
Untextured, usually cooked and pressed
Asiago d'Allevo, Grana (Italy); Reggianito (Latin America); Sbrinz (Switzerland) Edam, Gouda (The Netherlands) Pecorino Romano, Pecorino Sardo (Italy); Kefalotiri (Greece); Manchego, Idiazabal (Spain); Ras (Egypt) Provolone (Italy); Parenica (Russia); Kashkaval (Bulgaria); Kasar peyniri (Turchia) Emmental (Switzerland, France); Svembo, Danbo (Denmark); Kefalograviera (Greece) Cantal (France); Cheddar, Cheshire, Derby, Single Gloucester, Double Gloucester (UK); Monterey (USA) Gruyere (Switzerland, France); Puzzone di Moena (Italy); Tete de Moine (Switzerland)
Washed curd, long ripened Same as G1 but goats' or ewes' milk Kneaded curds ('pasta filata')
0
~_o ii
Cheeses with eyes
e-, -d_J .~ x
-r--
m
I
I-
o x o
(D O') O 0 c cO 0 .@.., O) 0 ::t: "~
~-~
~. .-=
Textured (and dry salted) curd ('Cheddaring') Smeared rind The microbial coat causes the development of strong aroma Melted Smoked Grated or fractionated Mixed with other ingredients (fruit, vegetables, spices)
Ripened or kept under particular conditions, i.e., 'Pickled cheeses'
"0O
E 0 0 e-
o
Obtained using special technologies (i.e., ultrafiltration, sterilization or finished cheese) Products similar to cheese and with non dairy ingredients
Processed cheese, Spread cheese, Sottilette TM Oak-smoked Cheddar (United Kingdom) 'Grating cheeses' Friesan Clove cheese (NL); Sage Derby (UK); Kummelkas~, K&se mit Champignons (Germany); Sapsago (Switzerland); Ciboulette (France) Devon Garland (United Kingdom); Bruss (Italy); Kopanisti (Greece); Tupi (Spain); Fromage fort (France) PhiladelphiaTM (USA); BelgioiosoTM (Italy)
'Imitation cheeses', Filled cheeses
1Index of maturation (IM) = soluble N • 100/total N. 2Index of lipolysis (IL) = free fatty acids • 100/total fat.
buttermilk by coagulation with acid (lactic or citric), with or without a heating step. However, a small amount of rennet is often used to increase the firmness of the coagulum (e.g., Quarg and Cottage cheese). The Lacticinia group contains one class (A) comprised of seven families. Family A1 includes yoghurt-like products from which some whey is removed. Family A2 contains somewhat similar products but from which a large volume of whey is removed and acid is added. Families A3 and A4 are whey cheeses produced by the combination of heat and acid (e.g., Ricotta) while cheeses in Families A5, A6 and A7 are similar to other products in the Lacticinia group except that they are made from cream, buttermilk or colostrum, respectively.
The second group, Formatica (Table 7), contains most cheese varieties, all of which are coagulated by rennet. This is a large heterogeneous collection of varieties which are divided into 6 Classes (B-G), based essentially on the moisture content and the extent of ripening, and 31 families. Classes B and C include fresh cheeses and varieties with a short ripening period, respectively. The cheeses in Class D are soft surface-ripened varieties with a surface growth of moulds or smear bacteria. Blue cheeses are grouped in Class E while Classes F and G contain semi-hard and hard/extra-hard varieties, respectively. The third group of cheeses, Miscellanea (Table 7), is a heterogeneous collection of varieties and includes
12
Diversity of Cheese Varieties" An Overview
processed, smoked, grated and pickled cheeses, cheeses containing non-dairy ingredients (fruit, vegetables, spices), cheese analogues and cheeses made using ultrafiltration technology. The scheme of Ottogalli (1998, 2000a,b, 2001) takes into consideration the technological, chemical, microbiological and organoleptic characteristics of different cheese varieties, with the objective of a better classification of cheeses and related fermented dairy products into distinct categories. Chemical indices, which were given particular importance in the development of this classification scheme, included index of maturation (IM = soluble N • 100/total N, which can range from 1-2 to 60-70% although data for many cheeses are not available), lipolytic index (LI = free fatty acids • 100/total fat, which can range from 1-2 to 15-20%, although data for many cheeses are lacking) and fat:protein ratio (high fat = 2-5, medium fat = 1.2-1.5, low fat = 20 000 L) volumes of milk. The operating principles of the design are illustrated in Fig. 2. Switching from the vertical to the horizontally mounted vats simplified the construction required to process the larger milk volumes. The essential difference between the three horizontal OST models (III, IV and V) is in the design of the cutting/stirring mechanisms. The knife in the OST III vat is thicker and its cutting/stirring speed is
27
limited to 6 rev/min. In comparison, the knife in the OST IV vat is thinner and has 'stay-sharp' qualities that reputedly reduce fat and fines losses to the whey. The construction and design of the OST V knife frames was revised to meet the latest hygiene requirements and to improve cheesemaking performance. In early 2002, Tetra Tebel delivered the thousandth vat of the series (OST III-OST V). OST vats have been installed in 35 countries and this vat type is used to make a range of cheese types, including semi-hard (Edam, Gouda, St Paulin, Havarti), hard (Cheddar, Emmental, Romano, Monterey Jack, Egmont, etc.) and low-moisture Mozzarella (Pizza type). The Damrow double-O vat
The vertical Damrow vat was developed in 1972 and has had two updates (Fig. 3). This vertical design was to become Damrow's 'proven standard', and to date
OST IV cheese vat. 1. Combined cutting and stirring tools, 2. Strainer for whey drainage, 3. Frequency-controlled motor drive, 4. Jacket for heating, 5. Manhole, 6. CIP nozzle. Courtesy of Tetra Pak, Sweden.
28
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Damrow Double-O cheese vat. Courtesy of Damrow Inc., USA.
900 are in use worldwide. Although used to make a range of cheese types, the vertical Damrow vats were used almost exclusively in the New Zealand cheese industry in the early days of mechanisation to produce Cheddar and other dry-salt cheeses. Easily recognised with its 'double OO' configuration, the vertical Damrow vat has two vertical knife arrangements that were used both to cut and stir the curd. Capacity ranges between ~ 1000 and 22 700 1. The Damrow horizontal vat
The horizontal double OO Damrow (DOH) was Damrow's second-generation vat. The design was patented in 1994 and improved upon in 1997, 1999 and 2000 (Fig. 4). Superior draining capability, improved yield and a hot water or steam dimple jacket are characteristics of this vat type. To date, 49 DOH vats are in service in Canada, USA and New Zealand. Three vat sizes are available: ~ 1 6 000 1, ~ 1 8 000 1 and ~ 3 0 000 1. The Scherping horizontal cheese vat
(HCV)
The first dual-barrelled horizontal cheese vat was developed by Scherping Systems in 1988. Of interest are the unique design of the vat's 'counter-rotation', dual agitator, the cutting and stirring system and the
staggered design of the knife arrangement of the thirdgeneration model (see Fig. 5). The unique 'interlocking' action and the lower speed required by the two counter-rotating agitators in both cutting and stirring modes are claimed to reduce losses and to give a more uniform curd particle size distribution. A study on cutting similar to that of Johnston et al. (1991) was undertaken on the Scherping HCV by McLeavey (1995). Since 1998, 328 of the patented HCVs have been built mainly for US customers; HCVs have been installed in one plant in New Zealand. The most popular capacities are 25 000 and 30 000 1. As would be expected in a mostly American market, consumer cheeses made using HCVs are Americanstyle Cheddar, Colby, Swiss, Co-jack and Monterey Jack cheeses and the Italian-style Mozzarella, Asiago and Parmesan cheeses. Cheeses for further processing, such as the fat-free, reduced-fat or low-moisture barrel Cheddar and Swiss barrel cheeses are also made in HCVs. Scherping Systems, now a Carlisle company, has now developed and is producing the fully automated thirdgeneration HCV incorporating new counter-rotating agitators, dual curd outlets for more effective emptying and changes to the knife configuration of previous HCVs.
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
29
Damrow DOH horizontal cheese vat. Courtesy of Damrow Inc., USA.
The A P V CurdMaster
The first APV CurdMaster was produced in 1993 and its design is based on the Protech CurdMaster and the Damrow Double-O vat design, as shown in Fig. 6. As with the Damrow Double-O vat, each of the two knife panels of the APV CurdMaster is hung-off centrally located axes within each 'barrel'. However, the light stainless steel knives are mounted vertically in a stag-
gered formation across each panel, and the stirring blades are made of polypropylene. APV Denmark decided to concentrate on the DoubleO design because there were several advantages. The Double-O design allows: 9 for variable degrees of filling from 40 to 100%; 9 all shaft seals to be located above product level;
Scherping horizontal cheese vat. Courtesy of Scherping Systems, USA.
30
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
APV CurdMaster cheese vat. Courtesy of Invensys APV, UK.
9 efficient horizontal and vertical mixing; 9 minimal air entrapment after predraw or reduced fill levels. In addition, APV modified the attachment of the bottom of the vat to its support frame (floating bottom) to avoid welds cracking during heating and cooling. A 5 ~ incline and two outlets instead of one for more rapid and efficient emptying, staggered stay-sharp knives, polypropylene agitators and whey predraw during agitation are other modifications made by APV. Since 1993, APV Denmark, now part of the Invensys APV group of companies, has sold 146 APV CurdMaster vats to 56 customers throughout Europe and Latin America. The capacity ranges from 6000 to 30 000 1. Cheese types made using the APV CurdMaster include Danbo, Raclette, Mozzarella, Gouda, Edam,
Emmental, Tilsit, Blue, Feta, Maasdam, Cagliata, Provolone, Norvegia, Manchego, Camembert, Pecorino, Grana, Cheddar, Havarti, Port Salut and Parmesan. It is interesting to note that many of the cheeses listed are curd-washed varieties. Continuous processes
There have been various attempts to replace the batch vat process by continuous systems. Two systems warrant brief mention. An innovative system using uhrafihration technology and a sequential coagulation system was developed jointly by the CSIRO in Australia and APV, the process being named Sirocurd. Two commercial plants were developed and these successfully produced Cheddar-types cheese, with the benefits of increased yield from the uhrafihration stage (Jameson, 1987); however, the Sirocurd equipment is not now in operation.
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
The other system, which is still widely used, is the Alpma continuous coagulator. A diagram of this equipment is shown in Fig. 7. The system incorporates the use of a continuous belt, which is formed into a trough to hold the milk. This trough is then subdivided by a series of plates to effectively form mini-vats. As the belt moves, the vats also move along and the same processes that occur in a batch vessel are carried out on the belt, via the use of cutting tools, stirrers and other tools that are incorporated along the length of the belt. Partial whey drainage and water addition can also be incorporated, with the main curd/whey separation occurring at the end of the belt. Cooking is difficult with this system, which is therefore more suitable for the production of soft to semi-hard cheese types. Gentle treatment of the curd and evenness of particle size result in uniformity and continuity of output. These coagulators are in use worldwide, producing a wide range of cheese varieties from fresh curd to Havarti. Post vat stages - dry-salted types
Processing options here depend largely on whether the curd undergoes further development and handling as curd particles, followed by dry-salting and block formation, or whether the final cheese block is formed immediately, followed by subsequent brining for salt uptake. As shown in Fig. 1, distinctive processes are involved. The processes described here apply to hard cheese varieties such as Cheddar, Colby, Egmont and stirredcurd cheeses.
Oewheying The vats are emptied by pumping out their contents of curds and whey. This process is commonly described as running or draining the vat. Correct pump selection
31
is of vital importance as the curd can potentially be damaged, generating large quantities of fine particles that are lost into the whey stream. Large, slowly revolving, positive rotary lobe pumps are a common option, with the Sine | pump, which uses a specially formed impeller, becoming increasingly popular because of its gentle operation and low curd damage. During emptying of the vats, the stirrers remain in operation to ensure mixing of the vat contents. For the whole cheesemaking process to be effectively continuous, despite the batch vat stage, it is necessary for there to be a number of vats, e.g., eight vats operating and emptying in sequence to provide a continuous flow of curd. Even with this system, there is variation in acidity and composition between the curds that first leave the vat and those that leave towards the end. This effect can be minimised on multi-vat plants by overlapping vat emptying using dual pumps. The ratio of curd to whey also varies as the vat is emptied, with a higher proportion of curd at the start. The pump speed is controlled to increase during vat emptying to provide a uniform flow of curd to the next stage of the process. Primary separation of the curds and whey is achieved by pumping the curds/whey mixture from the cheese vat over a specially designed dewheying screen. This is normally parabolic in shape, fitted with horizontally oriented wedge wires, to maximise the efficiency of the separation process with minimal curd damage. The whey passes through the screen and the curd is transported to the next stage. The feed to the screen is designed to provide an even, gentle flow across its width; this is often achieved by the use of a weir feed arrangement. An example of the system used is illustrated at the top of Fig. 8, the Alfomatic cheesemaker. The whey that is removed through the screen is
Alpma coagulator. 1. Belt infeed, 2. Spacing plate insertion station, 3. Milk infeed, 4. Spacing plate in the coagulator, 5. Spacing plate transport, 6. Spacing plate extraction, 7. Curd-releasing station, 8. Curd cutter, longitudinal, 9. Curd cutter, crosswise, 10. Open syneresis sector, 11. Belt discharge, 12. Spacer plate cleaning. Courtesy of Alpma, Germany.
32
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Alfomatic cheesemaker. 1. Whey screen, 2. Whey sump, 3. Agitator, 4. Conveyors (variable speed), 5. Agitators (optional) for stirred curd, 6. Chip mill. 7. Dry-salting system. Courtesy of Tetra Pak, Sweden.
collected and pumped to a tank prior to separate processing operations to produce a wide range of products. Initial processing operations include clarification to remove casein fines, centrifugal separation to recover fat and pasteurisation or thermisation to reduce the microbiological activity.
Drying (draining) the curd Commercial plants almost universally use a belt system for this next part of the process. Specially designed slotted plastic or stainless steel conveyor belts are used. These are usually fitted with peg-stirring devices mounted above the belts to agitate the curds in order to facilitate whey drainage and to prevent clumping of the curds. Residence times of 10 min are common. This belt often forms the first part of a cheese-texturing belt system. An example of these is the Alfomatic shown in Fig. 8.
Texturing (cheddaring) or stirring For varieties such as Cheddar, a traditional step in manufacturing protocol is the cheddaring stage, during which the curd is allowed to knit together, to flow and stretch and to develop a cooked chicken meat-type of structure. In the small open-vat process, cheddaring is achieved by heaping the drained curd along the sides of the vat and allowing it to fuse together. The fused mass is then cut into blocks of 10-20 cm and these are turned every 15-40 min over a period of 90-120 min to encourage flow and stretch to develop the desired
structure. There have been numerous attempts to replace this highly manual, labour-intensive process by a fully mechanised system. One such system is the cheddaring tower, a version of which was developed in New Zealand and is still available from Invensys APV. An example of this system is shown in Fig. 9. Essentially, the towers are cylindrical holding tubes, changing to a rectangular discharge section. Incorporated into their structure is a whey drainage system. Holding times of 1-2 h can be achieved with a capacity of up to 5000 kg curd/h. Large blocks of curd are guillotined from the column of curd as it exits from the base of the tower and fed into a curd mill. In the newer plants, a belt system has become very popular, typically with two belts running at different speeds to provide stretch, flow and inversion of the curd mass, and also to provide the desired holding time. Capacities of 12 000 kg of curd/h are possible. Examples of such equipments are the Alfomatic (Fig. 8), the Cheddarmaster (Fig. 10) and the Scherping draining conveyor (Fig. 11). These belt systems are totally enclosed in stainless steel housings. This provides a hygienic environment, and also the facility for in-place cleaning and maintenance of temperature. The belts are made of plastic or stainless steel and are generally not perforated, unlike the draining belts described earlier. The belts that are available for the cheddaring/holding stage can also be fitted with peg stirrers mounted
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
33
above the belt to facilitate the manufacture of stirred curd varieties, e.g., Cheshire and Egmont, on the same equipment. Similarly, the speed of the conveyors can be adjusted to provide the desired residence times.
Milling (size reduction) Following the texturing or cheddaring stage, the curd mass has fused into a solid structure. For the incorporation of salt in the next stage, it is necessary to reduce the solid mass to curd fingers (chips) of approximately 1.5 • 1.5 • 8 cm. This is achieved by the use of curd mills, of which there are a number of types. Most operate by using a rotating cutting tool, which cuts the curd mass in two directions using a blade and a comb. Prevention of fine particle generation is an important feature of the design. For stirred curd varieties, where little curd fusion has occurred, the mill still operates to break up any lumps that have formed. The mill is located at the base of the tower in a cheddaring tower system, or at the end of a conveyor belt in the more common belt systems.
Dry-salting and mellowing
APV cheddaring tower, with guillotine and mill at base. Courtesy of Invensys APV, UK.
Salting the curds is a vital part of the cheesemaking process. Salt has very important roles in flavour enhancement and in the control of microbiology, final cheese pH and moisture content. A detailed discussion on salting is given in 'Salt in Cheese: Physical, Chemical and Biological Aspects', Volume 1. Critical factors include the application of the correct ratio of salt to
APV Cheddarmaster belt system. Courtesy of NZMP Whareroa, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 2.)
34
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Scherping cheese curd draining conveyor. Courtesy of Scherping Systems, USA.
curd, even uptake of the salt and controlled loss of moisture. The level of salt required will vary according to the type of cheese being manufactured. There are two components to the salting p r o c e s s - the application of the salt (salting) and the subsequent mixing, uptake and associated moisture loss (mellowing). There has been a range of equipment designs to achieve satisfactory salting, with variable success. Simpler styles have included belt systems in which the quantity of curd being conveyed is measured by means of a fork sensing curd depth, with dry salt then being air-conveyed and distributed across the belt by a reciprocating boom. The quantity of salt is varied in proportion to the curd flow and is metered by a funnel and salt wheel device in a dry area of the plant. Better control can be achieved by using load cells on the belt to weigh the curd flow. Twin-salting booms are another alternative, each applying a proportion of the salt. A widely used system is the trommel or drum salter, in which the curd flow is directed over a weighing belt and then into a rotating drum into which the salt stream is directed. This provides accurate measurement and good mixing. However, if this system is to be used in conjunction with a belt plant, the curds must be conveyed from the belt to the salter and returned to the next belt. An example of such a system is shown in Fig. 12. A variation on this concept involves the use of an auger conveyor instead of the rotating drum to provide mixing of the salt and curds, as they are conveyed back onto the mellowing belt.
The mellowing belt provides a holding time of 10-20 min to allow the applied dry salt to be mixed, dissolved and absorbed by the curd, at the same time as moisture is expelled. The belts are equipped with peg stirrers to encourage mixing and moisture loss, and they are also enclosed to maintain temperature. An alternative to the belt system is the use of finishing/sahing vats or tables, which are suitable for stirredcurd varieties. In these, the curds/whey mixture is pumped from the vat into these batch tanks, which allow whey drainage, holding time and pH drop, salt addition and mellowing, all in one vessel. An example is the Damrow enclosed finishing vat shown in Fig. 13.
Pressing~block formation- general discussion This process is common to most cheese varieties, exceptions being particulate cheeses such as Cottage cheese. Block formation involves the conversion of granular, particulate curd into a solid block of cheese. The degree of compression required and the techniques used vary according to the cheese type. For example, close-textured hard cheeses such as Cheddar require the application of considerable pressure and air removal to form appropriate blocks. Other varieties, such as Blue cheese, require little compression and pressure in order to produce an open texture enabling air penetration and mould growth. Varieties such as Gouda and Edam require preliminary block formation while submerged in the whey prior to further compression. A vital component of block formation during the history of cheesemaking has been the cheese hoop or
General Aspects of Cheese Technology 35
Figure 12 Trommel salting system. Courtesy of NZMP Edendale, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 3.) mould. Although its use has been superseded by blockformers in the large-scale production of dry-salted cheese, it is still a vital component of many other plants and also small-scale dry-salt plants. The cheese hoop or mould is a specialised container designed to hold and form the curd into the desired shape, permitting the further loss of whey and the application of pressure and vacuum, if so desired. The moulds were made originally of wood, with the inner shape being that of the final cheese. They were cylindrical or rectangular and had holes drilled through the sides, base and lid to permit whey drainage. They were often lined with cloth (hence the term cheesecloth) to provide a porous barrier between the curd and the walls to allow whey drainage. An early option was the use of metal, especially for rectangular blocks, and the use of telescopic lids and bases to permit compression of the blocks under applied external pressure. This system is still in use for small-scale operations, with stainless-steel moulds and synthetic cloths providing improved hygiene. A major technological development has been the introduction of plastic moulds. These may range from a simple plastic or metal tube with appropriate perforations, for a variety such as Camembert, to which no external pressure is applied, to a highly sophisticated micro-perforated, grooved, muhi-mould for Gouda. This technology has eliminated the need for cheesecloths, as drainage is via the grooves and the micro-porous holes. Hygiene is
maintained through an appropriate cleaning process, which may include ultrasonics. The desired cheese surface effect may be achieved by selecting an appropriate surface grooving. A major recent advance has been the introduction of welded plastic moulds, eliminating the use of metal screws as in earlier types. The Dutch company, Laude bv, has been at the forefront of developments in this field, and examples of its products are shown in Fig. 14. The appropriate pressing regime to be applied to the curd contained in the mould depends on the cheese type and is discussed separately. There is a risk in the application of too much pressure initially, which results in surface closure and poor subsequent whey removal.
Pressing/blockforming of dry-salted cheese For dry-salted cheeses, the next stage of the process is the conversion of the salted chips of curd into a solid block. The traditional process involved the use of hoops or moulds into which the curd was weighed and then compressed, often overnight, by externally applied pressure using hydraulic rams, commonly in horizontal gang presses. This system is still in use in small-scale plants, and developments in this area are discussed in more detail under brine-salted cheeses. The universal system adopted in large-scale dry-sah plants involves the use of blockformers, of which there are a number of varieties. Wincanton Engineering in the UK patented the original development over 25 years ago.
36
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Damrow enclosed finishing vat. Courtesy of Damrow Inc., USA.
Plant capacity requirements usually mean that several blockformers are necessary and it is therefore important for reasons of product uniformity that an even feed is supplied to each blockformer. This may be achieved by using devices such as curd distribution tanks, which provide mixing of the curd from the mellowing belt and even distribution of the curd to the suction tubes feeding the blockformers. An example of these is shown in Fig. 15. All blockforming towers operate on a similar principle of using vacuum to draw curd into the top of the tower. The curd column is then subjected to further vacuum as it progresses down the tower. The internal side walls are perforated to facilitate whey and air removal, and the height of the towers (6-9.5 m) provides compression by gravity. As the curd travels down the tower, it is converted from individual curd par-
ticles into a fused column. This is discharged at the base via a guillotine arrangement, which produces blocks of cheese of a uniform shape and weight, typically 18-20 kg. The operation of the tower is illustrated in Fig. 16. The typical residence time in the towers is 30 min. Weight control is effected by adjustments to the platform height in the guillotine section. All the major equipment suppliers produce blockformers with variations in detail. Some of the more recent developments include extending the height to increase capacity and the provision of two different vacuum stages, as in the Tetra TwinVac Blockformer | This permits the use of a higher vacuum in the lower column, which is effectively separated from the upper column by a plug of curd, permiting the use of a lower transport vacuum in the upper section and a higher throughput.
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
37
Laude block mould. Courtesy of Laude by, The Netherlands. (See Colour plate 4.)
There are a number of variations of blockformers, producing differently shaped and sized blocks from 10-kg cylinders to 290-kg blocks. The type used depends on the product's end-use. A recent innovation by Cryovac | has been the introduction of bag loaders at the base of the towers, which automatically fit cheese bags to the discharge channels to receive the cheese blocks from the tower. The same company also supplies gusset stretchers to help present the bagged cheese in the appropriate form to the vacuum-sealing device. This equipment has removed another repetitive manual operation from the process. An example of blockformers fitted with bag presenters is shown in Fig. 17. The packing of the cheese is important as it plays a role during curing and storage, in the final cheese shape and appearance and in protection from the environment. The formed cheese blocks are discharged from the pressing towers into muhi-layered plastic bags. These are conveyed to a vacuum-sealing chamber where air is removed from the bag which is heatsealed. The gas and water permeability properties of the bag and the level of vacuum applied vary according to the cheese type. Prevention of moisture loss and prevention of mould growth are key factors for Cheddartype cheeses. The curd is still warm (typically 33 ~ as it exits the blockformers and is quite plastic. Therefore, the vacuum-sealed block requires the support of a carton
while cooling to maintain its desired shape and finish. Cartoning operations are normally fully automated with a variety of carton styles in use, ranging from a shoebox style with a separate base and lid to a wraparound one-piece type.
Ripening and storage This is a highly complex topic, which is the subject of several other chapters in this book (see 'Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview', 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening', 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening', 'Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation' and 'Instrumental Techniques', Volume 1). Cheese is essentially a complex matrix of protein, fat and carbohydrate, containing a range of enzymes and microorganisms. Their activities produce the changes that convert the young or green cheese into the desired final product, primarily through proteolysis, lipolysis and glycolysis. The primary objective of the cheesemaking process is to produce a material with the desired characteristics for ongoing changes during curing and storage. Factors such as salt content, pH and moisture content are of critical importance. The primary controllable factors after the young cheese has been made are the time and the temperature of storage. During ripening, changes in flavour and texture
38
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
which 40 or more blocks are stacked and shrinkwrapped. This format is suitable if the cheese is to be used for manufacture into processed cheese. Alternatively, the cheeses in cartons may be stacked on a pallet, or the cheeses in carton bases may be placed in bulk bins. These are strapped and tension is applied to help maintain shape and finish. This format is suitable for cheese intended for the precutting trade, where the large blocks are cut and repacked into consumer packs. Robots are normally used for these assembly operations. A typical assembly is shown in Fig. 19.
Ripening (curing). This involves the transfer of the palletised product to controlled-temperature storage rooms where the pallets are assembled onto racks. Typical temperatures are 8-10 ~ for a period of 35 days or so. Temperature and time after this stage will depend on the desired end-use for the product. For example, if a more rapid maturation is required, the temperature may be elevated to 15 ~ for 1 month. If a slower rate is required, a temperature of 2 ~ may be used. Once the desired degree of ripening has been achieved, the product is transferred to reducedtemperature storage to reduce the rate of further change. Storage. In this stage, the objective is for minimal change in product characteristics with time. This is achieved primarily through controlling the temperature. Freezing of the product is an option if the enduse for the product is processed cheese. Curd distribution tank. Courtesy of NZMP Stirling, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 5.)
occur. From a technological point of view, several stages can be identified- initial cooling, curing or ripening and controlled storage. The particular regime used depends on the cheese type and its intended use. Initial cooling of dry-salted cheese. This serves two
purposes. Firstly, a reduction in the temperature of the cheese curd causes the fat to solidify and the cheese to become firm and maintain its shape. Secondly, a sharp drop in temperature prevents the rapid growth of undesirable non-starter lactic acid bacteria, which could otherwise use residual lactose and produce undesirable gas and flavour defects. A reduction in temperature to 16 ~ within 12-16 h of manufacture is achieved by the use of open-rack stacking of the cheese blocks, which are then conveyed into a blast chiller, using air at 2-8 ~ Openrack stacking is necessary to permit good air flow and heat transfer. The rapid chillers operate on a first-in/firstout basis. An example is shown in Fig. 18. Following the rapid cooling operation, the cheeses are stacked into the form required for their long-term curing and storage. This may be a cartonless pallet on
Despatch The process described thus far is for the production of bulk blocks of cheese, typically weighing 20 kg. This product has many end-uses, such as an ingredient for many food products that contain cheese, conversion to grated cheese or processed cheese or cutting as natural cheese into consumer-size blocks. The uses of cheese as a food ingredient and as processed cheese are the subject of separate chapters ('Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products', 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). The preparation and packaging of cheese for domestic consumers involves the use of a wide range of sophisticated equipment and packaging technologies, the detail of which is beyond the scope of this chapter. Typical steps involve cutting the cheese blocks into the appropriately sized smaller blocks, followed by packaging in appropriate laminated material, under either vacuum or a modified atmosphere. Post vat stages - hard/semi-hard brine-salted types
Post vat processing of the cheese curd differs considerably for cheeses that are essentially formed into their final block shape on leaving the vat, as these generally require
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Blockformer operating principles. Courtesy of Tetra Pak, Sweden.
Blockformers with bag presenters. Courtesy of NZMP Edendale, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 6.)
39
40
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Dewheying For many varieties, partial whey removal occurs during the vat stage of processing, when the agitators are stopped for a period, allowing the curds to sink, and a whey-removal screen is lowered into the vat and the required amount of whey is drawn off. This is replaced by hot water, which serves to cook the vat contents and also to dilute the lactose and lactic acid content of the remaining whey. Further whey may be removed in the same way before the curds/whey mixture is pumped from the vat.
Pre-pressing
Rapid cooling tunnel. Courtesy of NZMP Hautapu, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 7.)
immersion in brine to achieve salt uptake. There are also processing differences depending on whether the cheeses are hard/semi-hard or soft and possibly mould-ripened. These differences are summarised in Fig. 1.
The presence of eyes or holes in the cheese is an important characteristic of several major cheese types, such as Gouda, Edam and Emmental. An important feature of the curd block formed for such cheese is the absence of air from within the block, and instead the presence of microscopic wheyfilled cavities in which micro-organisms can grow and produce gas, in particular CO2, which can ultimately form the characteristic round eyes (Martley and Crow, 1996; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997). For the appropriate curd characteristics, the curds are formed into blocks below the surface of the whey prior to curds/whey separation, in contrast to the procedure with dry-sahed cheeses such as Cheddar. This process is known as pre-pressing. As block formation occurs prior to salting, an alternative salting technique, brine salting, also becomes necessary. To reduce the volume of material to be handled during block formation, some whey is removed using the vat sieve or strainer prior to pumping out the curds/whey
Robot stacking of cheese blocks. Courtesy of NZMP Hautapu, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 8.)
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
mixture to the pressing stage. An early development of a mechanised system to achieve the objective of pressing under the whey involved the use of prepressing vats, as illustrated in Fig. 20. The curds/whey mixture is pumped into a rectangular vat, and perforated metal or plastic plates are placed above the vat contents, and then lowered below the whey to the curd layer, which is supported by a woven plastic belt at the base of the vat. This layer is then compressed by the application of hydraulic pressure to the plates and a solid curd mass is formed. The whey is then removed, and the curd layer is conveyed from the base of the vat through the now-open end and is cut into appropriately sized curd blocks by cutting tools prior to being placed in moulds for further pressing and formation. More advanced systems use a semi-continuous prepressing blockforming system of which the Casomatic | equipment produced by Tetra Pak Tebel is a widely used example. A diagram illustrating the working principles is shown in Fig. 21. Buffer tanks are used to store the curds/whey mixture pumped from the cheese vat; they are essential to provide an evenly mixed feed to the pressing system. The curds/whey mixture in the ratio of about 1:4 is then pumped to the top of the column, which is about 3 m in height, with a total unit height of 5.5 m. The column is filled and the curds settle below the whey to a height of about 2 m. Whey is removed from the column via three whey drainage bands; a controlled rate of removal is
41
critical for the formation of a block of the correct density at the base of the column. The curd block is formed in a dosing chamber and is cut from the column above by means of a guillotine. The dosing chamber then moves forward and discharges the formed block into a mould or hoop for further pressing and formation. Several variations using the same operating principle are available to produce blocks of various shapes and sizes from 1 to 20 kg, with discharge of multiple blocks from one column being possible. Exchangeable perforated drainage columns within a common jacket can be used, as in the Casomatic | MC model. Cheese types with irregular holes or eyes, also known as granular, e.g., Parmesan, can also be handled using equipment such as the Casomatic | Pressing under the whey is not required, and curds/whey separation can be achieved by the use of rotating sieves or strainers placed above the columns, discharging curd into the column for initial block formation.
Pressing Having formed the curd into the final cheese block by moulding in the pre-pressing stage, further pressing of the block is necessary. This provides a further period for ongoing acid development and pH and texture change, and assists final whey expulsion, shape formation and also surface texture for subsequent rind formation, where appropriate. Simple vertical pressing systems are suitable for small-scale operation, where the cheese moulds are loaded into
Pre-pressing vat. 1. Pre-pressing vat, 2. Curd distributors or CIP nozzle (2a), 3. Unloading device, 4. Conveyor. Courtesy of Tetra Pak, Sweden.
42
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
programme. Again, simultaneous loading and unloading of the pressing bays are practised. An example of a conveyor pressing system is shown in Fig. 23. Pressing times and pressures vary with the cheese variety and block size. It is important that there is a gradual increase in pressure, as the application of too much pressure at the start can cause closure of the surface and prevent whey removal. A typical programme for 10 kg Gouda cheese is 1 bar (0.1 MPa) for 20 min, followed by 2 bar for 40 min. For cheeses such as Emmental where blocks of 30-100 kg are common, a specialised system has been developed by Tetra Pak Tebel; it incorporates a specialised mould-filling system that can also incorporate pressing, with a further external press equipped with inverting facilities to help improve cheese quality and uniformity. Another automated system for blocks up to 700 kg is available. Once the required pressing operation has been completed and the desired pH drop has been achieved, the cheese blocks are removed from the moulds and are conveyed to the next stage of brining. The used moulds and lids are returned to the system via a cleaning process.
Brining
Casomatic operating principles. 1. Curd/whey mixture inlet, 2. Column with sight glass, 3. Perforated whey discharge, 4. Interceptor, 5. Whey balance tank, 6. Cutting and discharge system, 7. Mould, 8. Pawl conveyor, 9. Whey collecting chute. Courtesy of Tetra Pak, Sweden.
the press and the appropriate pressure regime is applied by lowering hydraulic rams. For larger-scale operations, trolley presses, tunnel presses or conveyor presses are used. With trolley presses, the cheese moulds are placed on a trolley, which is then fed into a tunnel equipped with a series of individual vertical rams. These are subsequently lowered to apply the appropriate pressure to the batch of cheese. Automatically fed tunnel presses operate by automatically loading cheese into the tunnel, followed by the pressing programme for the whole batch. Simultaneous loading and unloading is possible. An example is the APV SaniPress system shown in Fig. 22. The conveyor press is another option, with the cheese moulds being loaded onto a conveyor system, where the blocks are assembled into groups. Each block or pair of blocks has an individual hydraulic ram and each group has its own individual pressing
Cheeses that have been formed into blocks under the whey cannot be salted prior to moulding and pressing. The application of dry salt to the cheese surface is one technique that is used for some cheeses, such as Blue, but for many cheeses brine-salting is simpler, provides greater uniformity and is less labour-intensive. Many cheeses that have traditionally been made using brinesalting can in fact be made using the simpler and cheaper dry-salting technology described already for Cheddar-type cheeses. However, eye development is not usually attempted, with the major objective being to produce the appropriate typical flavour and texture. As already mentioned, there is a detailed discussion of salting in 'Salt in Cheese: Physical, Chemical and Biological Aspects', Volume 1. Brine-salting basically involves the immersion of the cheese block into a brine bath. The brine is a solution about 19-21%, w/w, of NaC1. It should also contain an appropriate level of CaC12, e.g., 0.2%, w/w, to prevent leaching of calcium from the cheese. Its pH should be close to the cheese pH (typically 5.2-5.3) and its temperature should be 10-14 ~ As the brine is used, its salt concentration must be maintained as salt moves into the cheese and water/whey moves out, causing dilution. Also, the brine will become contaminated with cheese particles, whey proteins and undesirable bacteria. Filtration (including membrane filtration), centrifugal clarification and pasteurisation can be used to maintain brine quality. If properly cared
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
43
APV SaniPress tunnel pressing system. Courtesy of Invensys APV, UK. (See Colour plate 9.)
for, the same brine can be used for many years (Bylund, 1995b; Kristensen, 1999). The time required for adequate salt uptake in the brine depends on the size of the cheese block and the
desired final salt level. For example, a small 250 g Camembert may require only a few hours, whereas a 10 kg Gouda may require 2 days. Brining systems can be a simple tank in which the cheese is placed once it has
Conveyor pressing system, with Casomatics in foreground. Courtesy of NZMP Lichfield, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 10.)
44
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
been removed from its mould. Alternatively, a more continuous system, known as the serpentine or surface brining system, may be used, where the cheeses are floated in brine channels to holding pens for the required period. As the surface of the cheese is above the brine, periodic spraying of the surface with brine or forced dipping of the cheese below the surface is required to achieve even salt uptake. Another option for brine application is the TrayBrine System from APV (Fig. 24). Here, the cheeses are placed on plastic trays, which are stacked and connected to a brine distribution system. The brine flows down over the cheese surface, is recirculated for the required period and is then recovered. A common method of brining for large-scale operations is the deep brining technique, where the cheeses are floated onto shelves on racks which are then progressively submerged below the brine surface. Ideally, the racks should be emptied and the loading sequence reversed midway through the brining process to ensure the first-in/firstout principle for consistent salt uptake. An example of a deep brining system is shown in Fig. 25. In addition to the vital effect of providing salt uptake for control of the microbiology and flavour of the cheese, brining also provides a rapid cooling effect,
reducing the cheese temperature to a value close to that of the brine within several hours. This helps control the growth of undesirable bacteria in a similar fashion to the rapid cooling step used in Cheddar production.
Ripening Once the cheese has been brined for the required period, it is floated to the discharge point and removed from the brine via a conveyor. Its surface may be rinsed with a brine solution to remove any foreign matter and is then air-dried with a blower or air knife. Thereafter, packing and curing depend on the intended market. Rindless cheeses, which are very commonly produced for bulk markets, especially if they are to be used subsequently as ingredients, are packed into appropriate laminated plastics bags under vacuum. They are then put into cartons and are stacked on pallets and transported to the appropriate curing and storage conditions. If eye development is required, several stages of temperature change will be used, e.g., for Emmental, 3-4 weeks at 10 ~ followed by 6-7 weeks at 22-25 ~ for eye development, and storage/curing at 8 ~ for several months. For Gouda, conditions may be several weeks at 10-12 ~ followed
APV tray brining system. Courtesy of Invensys APV, UK. (See Colour plate 11 .)
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
45
Deep brining system. Courtesy of NZMP Lichfield, New Zealand. (See Colour plate 12.)
by 3-4 weeks at 12-18 ~ followed by several months at 10-12 ~ (Bylund, 1995b). If eye development is desired, as gas production is necessary, appropriately permeable laminated bags must be used to permit gas transport. If rinded cheeses are being produced, control of the humidity in the curing rooms is important (usually about 85-90%) to prevent undue moisture loss. Coloured wax coatings may also be applied to provide protection for the cheese. Some varieties, such as Parmesan and Emmental, require frequent turning during curing to maintain the desired shape. Mechanised systems, such as revolving shelf rails, are available for all the material-handling operations such as inversion of the final cheeses. As already discussed under Cheddar types, curing and maturation are a combination of time and temperature conditions, with the additional influence of humidity for cheeses that are not packed in plastic film.
Despatch The cheeses have the same multiple end-uses as already described for dry-salted varieties. However, as the brinesalting system tends to be more expensive, these products are more typically directed at the retail consumer market, requiring appropriate cutting and packaging. Post vat stages - brine-salted, soft mould-ripened
Cheeses such as Camembert and Blue fall into this category. Technological advances and automation have been applied to these varieties and ultrafiltration has had a major impact, as numerous advantages, includ-
ing yield improvement, can be obtained. The use of ultrafiltration is discussed in detail in 'Application of Membrane Separation Technology to Cheese Production', Volume 1. Discussion of these cheeses commences at the vat stage in Fig. 1. Uniformity of milk, starter and coagulant activity are of critical importance for the uniformity of syneresis, which is essential for these varieties (Pointurier and Law, 2001). The normal operations of coagulation, cutting, stirring and acid development occur in the vat. The milk entering the vat may have been pre-ripened with starter culture and is likely to include the mould spores for later development. However, because of the high moisture content, which changes rapidly with time due to syneresis, it is not practical or desirable to use large vats for the production of Camembert types, in particular, as the curd composition of the material first being discharged would be very different from that discharged 30 min later. Hence, curd formation in small vats of up to 300 1 is necessary, so that the contents may be discharged rapidly into multi-moulds where curds/whey separation (dewheying) occurs. This is combined with moulding and may be done by tipping the vats directly into the moulds or by using a specialised portioning system such as the APV Contifiller, illustrated in Fig. 26. Also illustrated here is the use of multiple small vats on a semi-automated line and handling systems for the filled moulds. The batch-continuous production system is necessary to obtain a uniform fill of curds/whey mixture into the moulds, as this is the determinant of the final cheese size and weight.
46
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
1. Curdmaking 2. Curd draining and filling 3. Stacking of mould batteries (A) and trays (B) 4. Turning of mould stacks
5. Acidification lines 6. Destacking 7. Transfer/turning of cheese from mould batteries to trays
8. Transport to climate room (A) and from brining (B) 9. Turning/emptying 10. Washing of mould batteries (A) and trays (B)
Process line for soft cheese with Contifiller. Courtesy of Invensys APV, UK.
The development of various systems, such as the ~11Pril'l,.., ,.,,..~.l~ nar"s ruP' 'c' ~c l~ i~ APcrrihPA i n m n r ~ , ,..,,..,.,.,.rlPtailhyu R p r l r a n r - ] (1987) and Pointurier and Law (2001). Some earlier systems include the use of micro-pans, which produce just enough curd for one mould. The Alpma continuous coagulator, already described in the vat stage section under continuous processes, has special application for these soft cheeses, being effectively a continuous series of small vats. The multi-moulds used to form the cheese may be in two sections to provide sufficient volume for the initial fill. The upper layer can be removed once initial block formation has occurred. The filled moulds can be stacked automatically and conveyed to the initial ripening rooms for further acid development, followed by brining in tanks for about 30 min, and then ripening for about 10 days in high humidity rooms for mould development. Frequent turning of the cheese is necessary during the first few days to ensure even block formation. This can be automated in larger plants. Final wrapping is done in air-permeable material and despatch follows. Variations such as dry-salting the cheese by surface application, may be used for Blue cheese. A feature of these mould-ripened cheeses is that a very open texture may be necessary to allow oxygen penetration for mould growth. Hence the cheeses are
not pressed by the application of any external pressurei11~t
J ""
"
crr~rit,r 8 ..... )'
ir
11~r-]
Fnr
ehwPr
r
~r
R111~
~xTh~,rp
internal mould growth is desired, the passage of air is facilitated by spiking holes through the cheese with special needles. Smear-ripened cheeses are another type within both the semi-hard and the soft categories. The key process is the application and growth of a smear culture, predominantly Brevibacterium linens, on the surface of the cheese during ripening. Various mechanised brushing systems are available for smear application, which is usually repeated several times during ripening, where control of humidity and temperature is critical. Post vat stages - fresh cheeses
Cottage cheese falls into the soft/fresh category but is unusual in that the final product consists of curd particles packed in the final container with the appropriate dressing. Specialised equipment has been developed to mechanise and automate the production of this highly popular product. An example of this equipment is the O-vat by Tetra Pak Tebel. Quark, cream cheese and similar products also fit here but their manufacture is very different and is not described in detail (see 'Acid- and Acid/Rennet
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Curd Cheeses: Part A Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties, Part B Cottage Cheese, Part C Acidheat Coagulated Cheeses', Volume 2). Following the formation of the coagulum in special ripening vats, the whey is separated using a specially designed centrifugal separator. The product is then blended with appropriate additional components, e.g., cream, and then filled directly into the final container. Post vat stages- pasta filata
Pasta-filata
cheeses are those varieties for which the curd has been worked or stretched and moulded at an elevated temperature before cooling. This process imparts a unique and characteristic fibrous structure that influences both the ripening and the functional profiles of the final cheese. Mozzarella is probably the best known of the Pastafilata cheeses, which are mainly Italian in origin. However, the category also includes cheeses such as Provolone, Scamorza, Caciocavallo, Kashkaval and Pizza cheese. Composition, particularly moisture level, and fresh versus ripened textures are characteristics that define the various varieties. The increase in popularity of the pizza in its various forms (from the thin-based traditional Italian pizza, with few or no toppings except Mozzarella and cooked in a wood-fired oven, to the American-style thick pan-based pizza, with a myriad of toppings and cooked rapidly in an impinge> type oven) has focussed attention on low-moisture Mozzarella or Pizza cheese (see 'Pasta-Filata Cheeses', Volume 2). del Prato (2001) discusses the various varieties of Pasta-filata cheeses and the traditional processes and purpose-built equipment to make them. However, another manufacturing option is to use existing equipment and to add on a cooker/stretcher and a cooling operation at the end of the curdmaking stage of the existing process. This has been the case in the development of New Zealand's Mozzarella industry. New Zealand produces only low-moisture part-skim (LMPS) Mozzarella and has adapted its Mozzarella-make procedure so that the existing Cheddar vats and curd-handling and cheddaring systems can be used to produce Mozzarella curd for stretching and subsequent cooling. Hence, the Pasta-filata process is included as a branch of the dry-salt Cheddar-type process in Fig. 1. Dry-salting can also partially or completely replace brining. Equipment designed to perform the stretching operation incorporates two essential components: cooking and stretching (the mechanical treatment of the curd following cooking). The cooking phase is where the Pasta-filata curd is transferred to the hot water section of a cooker/stretcher.
47
At this point, the curd is immersed, heated and worked by single- or twin-screw augers. The temperature of the water is determined by the temperature of the curd entering the stretcher, the curd flow rate and the target temperature of the cooked curd. Typical water temperature varies between 60 and 75 ~ with the cooked curd temperature varying between 55 and 65 ~ The mechanical treatment of the cooked curd influences the final cheese structure, composition and functionality. Moisture can be expelled or further incorporated. Salt and other ingredients can also be added at this point. Mechanical treatment or mechanical conditioning of the cooked curd is usually achieved by further working by single- or twin-screw augers or by 'dipping' arms in a relatively moisturefree environment. Following mechanical working, the curd may be extruded into a mould and immersed in chilled brine for cooling and salt uptake. Packaging and despatch follow, with shredding being a common option for pizza use. Almac s.r.l., Modena, Italy, Stainless Steel Fabricating, Wisconsin, USA and Construzioni Meccaniche E Technologia S.p.A (CMT), Italy, are examples of companies that manufacture a range of Pasta-filata processing equipment, including cooker/stretchers. Their equipment is described in the following sections. A l m a c s.r.L
Almac s.r.1, has been producing systems for making Pasta-filata cheese since the 1980s. They manufacture essentially three standard systems: for the production of high-moisture Mozzarella, for the production of Pizza cheese (low-moisture Mozzarella) and for the production of the ripened Pasta-filata cheeses (Provolone, Kashkaval and Kasseri). Turnkey design starts at curd draining and each system includes cheddaring (curd ripening), cooking/stretching, moulding and cooling (including pre-hardening and hardening), brining and packaging. Almac s.r.1, has an extensive range of cooker/stretchers with various capacities, built to handle a range of curd textures, depending on the type of Pasta-filata cheese to be made. An example is shown in Fig. 27. All the larger capacity cooker/stretchers use twin screws to convey the cut curd through the cooking section and all use the 'dipping arm' technology to condition the curd following cooking. All product contact surfaces are coated with a non-stick agent. A minimum quantity of water is used during the cooking phase to ensure high yields. Almac s.r.1, supplies Mozzarella cooker/stretchers to customers throughout Italy, other European countries and to Australia, Canada, Iran, Ecuador, Argentina, Brazil, the USA, Venezuela and Eygpt.
48
General Aspects of Cheese Technology
Almac cooker/stretcher. Courtesy of Almac, Italy. (See Colour plate 13.)
Stainless Steel Fabricating, Inc. qt.inloqq
qtool Fnhrirntino
(qqF)
is characterised by the fibrous nature of its texture and ,lqn
rn~Inllf~IrtllrOq
equipment for producing mainly low-moisture Mozzarella (American Pizza cheese) and Provolone. Stainless Steel Fabricating can provide cooker/stretchers, moulders and chilling-brining systems. It is a family-owned business, operating for the last 35 years and supplying Mozzarella equipment to Mozzarella manufacturers in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia and New Zealand. Five models, ranging in capacity from 25% of the DM of the forage used must be produced on the same farm where the cheese is manufactured; ->75% of the DM of the forage used must be produced
Gross chemical composition of the principal extra-hard cheese varieties (average data)
Cheese
Moisture (%)
Total protein (Nx6.38) (%)
Fat(%)
Ash(%)
Soluble N/Total N (%)
Grana Padano Parmigiano Reggiano Asiago Montasio Pecorino Romano Pecorino Siciliano Pecorino Sardo Fiore Sardo Canestrato Pugliese Castel mag no Fossa Sbrinz Mah6n Manchego Roncal Idiazabal Kefalotyri
32.0 30.8 34.0 32.0 31.0 31.5 31.0 26.5 34.5 35.0 32.0 31.0 31.7 35.5 29.4 33.2 35.0
33.0 33.0 29.0 26.0 28.5 32.5 27.2 30.0 26.5 26.0 27.0 31.0 26.9 24.0 24.7 23.3 26.6
27.0 28.4 31.0 34.0 29.0 28.0 35.0 32.5 30.0 33.0 35.0 32.0 32.6 33.6 38.8 37.8 28.7
4.9 4.6 5.0 n.a. 8.5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.0 n.a. 5.0 6.8 4.6 4.8 4.0 3.9
34.0 32.0 28.5 26.5 22.5 26.5 24.0 25.5 30.0 26.5 32.0 31.5 31.1 25.9 26.2 29.0 24.5
n.a., data not available; From various sources.
'~-
LO
LO
03
I
I
I
I
03
z:
04
04
~
0d I
0
O~ cO
--4
s
o
O
o o
O O
c-
C
0
0
0
s,_ .m
03
O0
(1)
03
LL
~. (:D 9 -0
c~ 0 (:D "0
c~ 9 9 -0
c~ (D 9 -0
O O
.m
.m
II
LL
oo
oo
C
0
c}.. O O "O
0 0 -0 >.,
.
s
oo
oo
t,.O
00
>,,
C
.
.
LL
0o
~ .
.
.
LL
~ .
.
LL
0o
~._ LL
0o
0o
~ c"Xl
Od
o4
cO
I 00
T-
04 o4
o4
~0
-0 0 >.,
04
-OJ
r,.O
OJ
9
9
,#_.s~,
.=-
.=-
,_
03
"o
00"~=o
-=
O
E)
"0
Cq" ~-~l"
"o
o 3 c-
.=o
t.f)
~S~ O4
' , , . . . - o ~. o , _ o . = _-_ S ~ o E3
E3
E3
03
O3
o
s
c
9
6
LO LO
r4~ ~
0 L~
C.O ~"
LO ~l"
I
I
I
I
I
LO
0 ~
-o
-0
0 ~
9
CO '~" 0
I
CO ~
LO ~
-~
00
00
9
..J
g
0
0 Z
~
0 Z
~
0
.Om
O
0
O
>
0
O Q.
0 00 0 (D cO "0
o"
~s 0
o
0
0
..J
o
c-m
G
4-, X 0
"= 9
o~
e3 c~ 0 c-
9~
.~_
03
O Or)
to 03 ttO c~
._
~.,_
~
._
c-
~,_
o
c-
c-
~,~o
o ~
o
Z
O
-o o
9" o 9
"o 9
E E
E E
E E
,L
s,...,
m
-~
E E E
~--
o
~- = ~o
~-= ~o
Z
Z
Z
Z
0 Z
or)
tOr)
-9d
~9
00
co
m
"~.~_ ~E "-o~
9 co
.~=~ 0
o
o Z
Z
Z
.o ._~ 0 o
O
n
s,_
>~
~_~
c~ 0 c-
9
_~
=
"0
tn
O
o
o
Cl.
o
t03
03
(.f)
.~_ 0 c
0
0
c-
c u . ~_ 9~ .m
o~ o')
o 00
n
5.3) to waxy (pH 5.3-5.1) to mealy (pH ~6%) produces a firm-textured cheese which is drier and ripens at a slow rate (Van Slyke and Price, 1952), whereas under-salting (i.e., an S/M < ~4%) results in a pasty cheese with abnormal ripening and flavour characteristics. Such factors as enzyme activity and the conformation of ors1- and [3-caseins in salt solutions (Fox and Walley, 1971), solubility of protein breakdown products, hydration of the protein network (Guerts et al., 1974) and interactions of calcium with the para-caseinate complex in cheese (Guerts et al., 1972) are all influenced by salt concentration. Effect of protein, fat and moisture
In dry-salted cheeses, water, fat and casein are present in roughly equal proportions by weight, together with small amounts of NaC1 and lactic acid. As protein is considerably more dense than either water or fat, it occupies only about one-sixth of the total volume. Nevertheless, the protein matrix is largely responsible for the rigid form of the cheese. Any modification of the nature or the amount of the protein in the cheese will modify its texture. Thus, reduced-fat Cheddar (17% fat) is considerably more firm and more elastic than full-fat Cheddar (35% fat), even when the level of MNFS in the cheese are the same (Emmons et al., 1980). This difference was explained by the presence in the reduced-fat cheese of about 30% more protein matrix, which must be cut or deformed in texture assessments, but such a large reduction in fat must also affect the texture of the cheese. Fat in cheese exists as physically distinct globules, dispersed in the aqueous protein matrix (Kimber et al., 1974). In general, increasing the fat content results in a slightly softer cheese (Bryant et al., 1995), as does an increase in moisture content, because the protein framework is weakened as the volume fraction of protein molecules decreases. However, relatively large variations in the fat content are necessary before the texture of the cheese is affected significantly (Lawrence and Gilles, 1980). Commercial cheese with a high FDM usually has a high MNFS (Lawrence and Gilles, 1986) and this causes a decrease in firmness. An inverse relationship between the fat content and cheese hardness has been reported (Whitehead, 1948; Baron, 1949; Fenelon and Guinee, 2000).
88
Cheddar Cheese and Related Dry-salted Cheese Varieties
Effect of ripening
Considerable changes in texture occur during ripening as a consequence of proteolysis (Hort and Le Grys, 2000, 2001). The rubbery texture of 'green' cheese changes relatively rapidly as the framework of Otsl-casein molecules is cleaved by the residual coagulant (Creamer and Olson, 1982; Johnston et al., 1994; Watkinson et al., 2001). A group of Cheddar cheeses examined over a period of nearly a year increased in hardness and decreased in elasticity with the age of the cheese, the greatest changes occurring during the first 30 days (Baron, 1949). Watkinson et al. (1997) measured proteolysis of ors1- and [3-caseins, and the strain at fracture (a measure of shortness (Gunasekaran and Ak, 2003)) as a function of ripening time. These results showed that the strain at fracture increased initially, probably as curd fusion continued, and then decreased continuously for the 400 days of the experiment. In part, this latter rheological (or textural) change is caused by the loss of structural elements, but another feature of proteolysis is probably important (Creamer and Olson, 1982): as each peptide bond is cleaved a molecule of water is incorporated into the resulting polypeptides and, in addition, two new ionic groups are generated and each of which will compete for the available water in the system. Thus, the water previously available for solvation of the protein chains becomes tied up by the new ionic groups, making the cheese more firm and less easily deformed. This change, in combination with the loss of an extensive protein network, gives the observed effect. Clearly, the change in texture during ripening depends upon the extent of proteolysis, which, for any individual cheese, is determined by the duration and temperature of maturation. The main factor that influences the rate of proteolysis appears to be S/M (Fox and Walley, 1971; Pearce, 1982; Fox, 1987). A direct relationship between S/M and residual protein was established whereas the correlation between moisture and residual protein was relatively weak. A cheese with a low S/M value has a higher rate of proteolysis and is correspondingly softer in texture than a cheese with a high S/M. The concentrations of residual rennet and plasmin in the cheese, together with the starter and non-starter proteinases present, are the important factors that determine the rate of proteolysis (Lawrence etal., 1983; C.J. Coker, T.M. Dodds, S.P. Gregory, K.A. Johnston and L.K. Creamer, unpublished results, 2000).
Cheese ripening is essentially the slow controlled decomposition of a rennet-induced coagulum of the constituents of milk to produce flavour (taste and aroma)
and textural changes. The final targeted flavour profiles and textures of ripened Cheddar and related dry-salted cheese varieties are variable as defined by different endcustomer requirements and traditional cultural flavour expectations. At the young end of the age range is cheese used solely as a source of intact casein for processed cheese, which has minimal flavour and textural change from the fresh curd. A low coagulant concentration, a low storage temperature, high S/M, short storage time or combinations of these are the main parameters used to achieve this end-use. At the other extreme are the strong flavoured Cheddar cheeses ripened for 12-24 months or more. During ripening, there are many changes and the ripening processes responsible are understood in general terms but many of the details are still being investigated. A vocabulary of sensory attributes has been developed to describe Cheddar (Muir and Hunter, 1992), and has been modified to include five odour, ten flavour and five textural attributes (Muir et al., 1995). Using this vocabulary with an experienced panel in combination with data analysis, the similarities and differences between Cheddar and 13 other hard cheeses popular in the United Kingdom have been described (Muir et al., 1995). The medium and vintage Cheddars stand out in a number of respects. In a similar analysis of 34 different Cheddars, a diversity of flavours was shown (Muir e t a l . , 1997). Cheddars made from raw milk were more intensely flavoured ,,,,,a ~,,,4 ,,t,,~,,,~l n . . . . . . . . . . ., ~,~ farmhouse cheeses It showing wide variations in composition and being associated with atypical flavour and texture. There is a significant correlation between the levels of proteolysis products and the extent of flavour development. Hydrolysis of the casein network, specifically e~sl-casein, by the coagulant appears to be responsible for the initial changes in the coagulum matrix (Creamer and Olson, 1982). The level of chymosin retained in the curd is pH dependent (Lawrence et al., 1983; Creamer et al., 1985). In fresh milk, plasmin, the indigenous alkaline milk proteinase, is associated with the casein micelles but it dissociates at low pH (Richardson and Pearce, 1981" Farkye and Fox, 1990). The activity of plasmin in cheese is reported to be dependent on cooking temperature (Farkye and Fox, 1990) as well as on pH and the salt and moisture contents of the cheese (Richardson and Pearce, 1981" Farkye and Fox, 1990). The role of plasmin in Cheddar cheese flavour has yet to be elucidated but it has been reported that the rate and extent of characteristic flavour development in Cheddar cheese slurries appeared to be related directly only to the degradation of [g-casein (Harper et al., 1971). Therefore, plasmin may well prove to be an enzyme of considerable importance in the development of cheese flavour. . . . . . .
Cheddar Cheese and Related Dry-salted Cheese Varieties
As the original casein network is broken down, ideally a desired balance of flavour and aroma compounds is formed. However, the precise nature of the reactions that produce flavour compounds and the way in which their relative rates are controlled are poorly understood. This has been due firstly to the lack of knowledge of compounds that impart typical flavour to Cheddar cheese, and secondly to the complexity of the cheese microflora as the potential producers of flavour compounds. Any organism that grows in the cheese, whether starter, adventitious non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) or adjunct culture and any active enzyme that may be present, such as chymosin or plasmin, will have an influence on the subsequent cheese flavour (Fig. 11). Research in New Zealand has shown that if the growth of starter and NSLAB is limited (Fryer, 1982; Lawrence et al., 1983) and if as little chymosin as possible is used (Lawrence and Gilles, 1971; Lawrence et al., 1972), the flavour that develops in Cheddar cheese is likely to be acceptable to most consumers. This section is an attempt by the present authors to summarize what they consider to be relevant to flavour development in Cheddar. Since the last version of this section (Lawrence et al., 1993), more details have been published; however, the last word on the flavour of Cheddar cheese is still to come. For more
Basic structure for Cheddar (pH and mineral content)
Ripening conditions within cheese (Moisture-in-casein; salt-in-moisture; lactose; temperature)
Residual rennet, plasmin and starter activity
Non-starter activity " " " " " ,,
~ SSSSS
s
89
details on the biochemistry of cheese ripening, refer to 'Biochemistry of Cheese Ripening: Introduction and Overview', 'Metabolism of Residual Lactose and of Lactate and Citrate', 'Lipolysis and Catabolism of Fatty Acids in Cheese', 'Proteolysis in Cheese during Ripening', 'Catabolism of Amino Acids in Cheese during Ripening', Volume 1. Effect of milk-fat
It is well accepted that Cheddar cheese made from skim milk does not develop a characteristic flavour. Cheese with an FDM greater than 50% developed a typical flavour whereas cheese with an FDM less than 50% did not (Ohren and Tuckey, 1969). In this study, when a series of batches of cheese were made from milk of increasing fat content (from 0 to 4.5%), the quality of the flavour improved as the fat content increased. However, if the fat content was increased above a certain limit, the flavour was not further improved. Substituting vegetable or mineral oil for milk-fat still resulted in a degree of Cheddar flavour (Foda et al., 1974). This suggests that the water-fat interface in cheese is important and that the flavour components are dissolved and retained in the fat. Clearly, although milk proteins and lactose are the most likely sources of many of the flavour precursors in Cheddar cheese, the fat plays an important but not yet defined role; in part, the lack of understanding is due to the more limited fat modifications. The extent of lipolysis has been calculated to vary between 0.5 and 1.6% over time in good quality Cheddar (Perret, 1978). A number of fatty acids, keto acids, methyl ketones, esters and lactones in Cheddar are likely to have been derived from milk-fat; some are at concentrations to impact on flavour, but others contribute only to a background flavour (Urbach, 1995; McSweeney and Sousa, 2000). The residual activity after pasteurization of the indigenous milk lipase and the relatively low lipase/esterase activities of the starter and NSLAB are likely to be important in the hydrolysis of milk-fat to free fatty acids because of their flavour potency. The quality of the milk is probably a factor in excessive lipolysis in off-flavoured Cheddar (Perret, 1978). The catabolism of free fatty acids to other flavour compounds, by implication of their presence, occurs but the mechanisms are ill-defined.
i
Effect of proteolysis Acceptable Cheddar flavour
Off-flavours
The main factors that determine the development of flavour in Cheddar cheese.
As described earlier, the consequence of proteolysis of casein represents the most important biochemical ripening event in Cheddar, causing major texture changes and in addition making important contributions to both aroma and taste (Fox, 1989; Fox and
90
Cheddar Cheese and Related Dry-salted Cheese Varieties
McSweeney, 1996). A further consequence of proteolysis may be the release of flavour components that were previously bound to the protein (McGugan et al., 1979). The products of proteolysis include small- and intermediate-sized peptides and free amino acids and contribute at least to a background flavour (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000), or make a significant contribution to flavour intensity. It has been suggested (McGugan et al., 1979; Aston and Creamer, 1986) that the importance of low levels of such non-volatile compounds as peptides, amino acids and salts has been under-rated in the past. This view is supported by the highly significant correlations found between the levels of proteolysis products and the extent of flavour development (Aston et al., 1983). The level of phosphotungstic acid-soluble amino nitrogen was found to be a reliable indicator of flavour development. Above certain limits, however, the level of peptides results in bitterness. Cheddar cheeses made using temperatureinsensitive starter strains were found to become bitter because large numbers of starter cells contributed excessive levels of proteinases. These released bittertasting peptides from high molecular weight peptides that had been produced mainly as a result of chymosin action (Lowrie and Lawrence, 1972). The subject of bitterness, the single most common defect in Cheddar cheese, has been extensively reviewed (Crawford, 1977; Fox, 1989).
quality of the cheese decreased. Some amino acids such as phenylalanine and the branched amino acids yield Strecker degradation products, which in excess cause unclean flavour defects in Cheddar (Dunn and Lindsay, 1985).
for reactions that produce a range of flavour compounds (McSweeney and Sousa, 2000). Recent studies using gas chromatography-olfactometry and related techniques have identified key aroma components of Cheddar cheese (O'Riordan and Delahunty, 2001; Zehentbauer and Reineccius, 2002). Some of these (dimethyl sulphide, methional, dimethyl trisulphide and 3-methylbutanal) are likely to originate from amino acids (Urbach, 1995). Several reports strongly implicate the volatile sulphur compounds, specifically methanethiol, in Cheddar cheese flavour (Green and Manning, 1982; Lindsay and Rippe, 1986), but an Australian report (Aston and Douglas, 1983) concluded that none of these sulphur compounds is a reliable indicator of flavour development. However, it is conceivable that, although the volatiles do not make a measurable contribution to the intensity of Cheddar flavour, they may still be an essential factor in the quality of the flavour (McGugan et al., 1979). This is supported by the finding (Manning et al., 1983) that the quality of blocks of Cheddar cheese decreased, and off-flavours increased, with a decrease in block size. Headspace analysis showed that the concentrations of HzS and CH3SH, compounds that are extremely susceptible to oxidation, decreased as the
bitterness, which mask or detract from cheese flavour, are produced. A reduction in unpleasant flavour is associated with improved perception of the Cheddar flavour (Lowrie and Lawrence, 1972; Lowrie et al., 1974). The increase in the use of direct vat inoculum (DVI) cultures in Europe for the manufacture of cheese has led to greater usage of Lc. lactis subsp. lactis strains of starter. Because these strains have a greater tendency than Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris strains to produce bitterness in cheese, bitterness is more common with the use of DVI cultures than with bulk cheese starter (Heap, personal observation). During, or soon after, the manufacture of Cheddar curd, the starter viability decreases and is 7 ~ under anaerobic conditions with lactate as C-source. The redox potential will then be reduced from - - 1 3 0 mV to < - 2 0 0 mV, which may be used as an indicator for BAE Gouda cheese, as a brined cheese, is especially vulnerable to BAE the more so for larger cheese loaves. The normal eye formation is limited and too large holes are easily detected as a defect. Because of the serious nature of the defect, much research has been undertaken to find ways to reduce the number of spores in milk and to prevent their germination and growth in cheese. Factors studied include: bactofugation of the milk, addition to
133
the milk of nitrate, hydrogen peroxide or other oxidising substances, or lysozyme, the use of a nisin-producing starter, the salt content and pH of the cheese, cheese ripening temperature and amount of (undissociated) lactic acid (for relevant literature information, see van den Berg et al., 1980, 1988; Stadhouders et al., 1983c). The technique of microfihration is practically not used for Gouda cheese (see 'Bactofugation'). Nitrate may be used effectively to prevent BAF and has been used for this purpose for about 170 years. The mechanism of inhibition requires the presence of xanthine oxidase (EC 1.2.3.2), which reduces nitrate to nitrite (Galesloot, 1961). Nitrite is considered to delay the germination of spores for a certain period after brining (but the actual mechanism may well be more complicated, according to Stadhouders et al., 1983a). Later on, the inhibitory action is taken over by NaC1 when it has become evenly distributed throughout the cheese and if it is present at a sufficient concentration. If nitrite is the only factor involved in the initial inhibition, it must be very effective since it is present at only a very low concentration. The formation of nitrite was a reason to investigate the presence of nitrosamines in Gouda cheese. From the results of Goodhead et al. (1976), the existence of this danger appears to be not likely. Since xanthine oxidase is a milk enzyme, its inactivation by pasteurisation will increase between 72 and 82 ~ (see Fig. 2). In this way the effectiveness of nitrate declines. High numbers of coliform bacteria and some strains of mesophilic lactobacilli will degrade nitrate to nitrite during the first weeks, increasing the risk of BAE In cheese, nitrite is supposed to be degraded slowly eventually to NO and N2 that may diffuse outside the cheese. At a given curing temperature, usually about 14 ~ the combined effect of several factors determines whether growth of BAB is possible or not. Important factors promoting growth are a large number of spores in the cheese milk, a low content of undissociated lactic acid (hence usually a high pH), a low nitrate content in the cheese and a low level of NaC1 in the cheese moisture. The rate at which salt becomes homogeneously distributed throughout the cheese mass, its final concentration and the initial nitrate content of the cheese are, therefore, crucial. For example, a cheese with a high pH requires a higher than normal final salt concentration to inhibit growth. Since the pH of the cheese is increased by BAE growth conditions for the organism then become more favourable and consequently the rate of fermentation is accelerated. It is the experience of the authors that germination of the first spores may occur in cheese very soon. Therefore, the presence of nitrate on the first day is necessary and even a later start of brining by some
134
Gouda and Related Cheeses
hours will increase the incidence of BAE An L- or Otype starter makes the cheese somewhat less-sensitive to BAF in comparison with the use of the DL-type starter, probably because of the difference in production of acetate (Stadhouders, 1990). Low numbers of spores in the cheese milk, which also can be achieved by bactofugation, permit the amount of nitrate to be reduced considerably. If one wishes to produce cheese without nitrate addition, the critical number of spores in milk capable of causing the BAF is extremely low, ---5 spores/1 milk as found by van den Berg et al. (1988). To this end, effective double bactofugation of the milk is certainly necessary when making standard 12 kg Gouda cheese. Critical numbers of spores at different nitrate concentrations are also given in this study, e.g., ---250 spores/1 need 2.5 g nitrate/100 1 milk and ---10 000 spores/l need 15 g nitrate/100 1 milk. The latter number of spores may occur in the winter season. If then, only 2.5 g nitrate/100 1 milk may be used, single bactofugation with sludge sterilisation will be necessary under north-west European conditions. Lysozyme has often been proposed as an alternative to nitrate. Its use is somewhat more expensive than bactofugation for a similar protective effect. At the amount recommended (e.g., 500 IU/ml of cheese milk), it is usually less effective than nitrate, according to experience with Gouda cheese (Stadhouders et al., 1986). In comhinalion with qinale harlnfllg~fiem thiq amount may be used. Some spores are quite resistant to lysozyme, whereas others are readily inhibited or are even more sensitive to lysozyme than to nitrate (Lindblad, 1990). Nisin shows antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Listeria and Staphylococcus spp. Currently, it is used in a wide range of foods and beverages, such as processed cheeses. However, for normal cheese manufacturing it cannot be used because it is lost in the whey and inhibits many starter bacteria. Recently, defined nisin-producing starter cultures were selected and have begun to be marketed; these could be used to manufacture good-quality Gouda-type cheese. Starters which produce nisin in situ during cheese manufacture give a very strong protection against spores of Clostridium tyrobutyricum and Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (Meijer et al., 1998). Lactobacilli Growth of mesophilic normal or salt-tolerant lactobacilli may cause flavour and texture defects, especially in mature cheese. Even when initially present at small numbers, e.g., 10/ml of cheese milk, some strains of common lactobacilli (Lb. plantarum, Lb. casei, Lb. brevis) may grow slowly in cheese to more than
2 • 107/g in 4-6 weeks (Stadhouders et al., 1983c), causing gassy and putrid flavours and an excessively open texture. Probably, amino acids are used as a carbon source. The organisms are killed by adequate pasteurisation of milk, e.g., 15 s at 72 ~ In industrial practice, continuously working curd-drainage machines were often an important source of contamination but improved designs, minimising 'dead spots', make longer standing times possible. However, growth on surfaces of tanks should also be considered. Especially when the salting of cheese is carried out in brine of reduced strength, there is a risk of defects caused by salt-tolerant lactobacilli, some strains being able to survive even in the presence of >15% NaC1. Furthermore, they differ from normal lactobacilli by their continuing growth in cheese and their active amino acid metabolism, causing phenolic, putrid, mealy and H2S-like flavours in 4-6-month-old cheeses. Some strains also produce excessive quantities of CO2, causing the formation of holes, either eyes or cracks according to the consistency of the cheese (Stadhouders et al., 1974). More than 103 of these gas-forming lactobacilli per ml of brine is considered to be dangerous. The lactobacilli may enter the cheese by penetrating the rind during brining, this being facilitated if the cheese is insufficiently pressed and the rind not wellclosed (Hup et al., 1982). Of course, contamination of the cheese milk with these bacteria must be prevented. If ...... 1. k ~ ; . . (e.g., . . . . . . . . . j . . . . ~,. . . . . . . . . . . . . y acid (pH 90% lactate. The streptococci produce only L-lactic acid, whereas Lb. delbrueckii subsp. lactis converts lactose entirely to D-lactate. Both isomers are produced by Lb. helveticus. Lactose is fully hydrolysed within 4-6 h after addition of the lactic starters, and the lactic acid fermentation is completed after 24 h. Galactose from lactose breakdown is not utilised by the streptococci, but is metabolised by the lactobacilli. To avoid undesired fermentations, no residual galactose should remain after the lactic fermentation. During cheese ripening, the proteinases and peptidases of lactobacilli play a major role in the breakdown of casein. Some decades ago, Lb. helveticus was a major component of starter cultures in the manufacture of Swiss Emmental. Due to its intensive peptidolytic activity, which promotes late fermentation, it has been replaced by Lb. delbrueckii subsp, lactis. Streptococci play a minor role in proteolysis. In areas where the cheese milk is collected twice daily, it is quite common to add a mesophilic culture of lactococci (Lactococcus lactis) to the evening milk to pre-ripen it. In the production of semi-hard cheeses with a propionic acid fermentation, mesophilic species are also used.
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 2: Major Cheese Groups ISBN: 0-1226-3653-8 Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
142
Cheeses with Propionic Acid Fermentation
Traditional Swiss Emmental cheese. (See Colour plate 16.)
Facultatively heterofermentative non-starter lactobacilli are purposely used in the Swiss artisanal cheese industry to slow down the propionic acid fermentation. They ferment hexoses almost exclusively to lactic acid. This group of micro-organisms contains, among others, Lb. casei and Lb. rhamnosus which are indigenous to raw milk. During cheese ripening, they grow by utilising citrate which is found in the fresh unripened cheese. Starting from 9 mmol/kg citrate in the cheese curd, native facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli utilise approximately 3 mmol and those added as adjunct cultures metabolise all available citrate to formic acid, acetic acid and CO2 (Table 4).
about 1000 1 of milk). Propionic acid fermentation begins about 30 days after the start of manufacture at about 20-24 ~ for roughly 7 weeks and then continues at a slower rate at 10-13 ~ In cheeses ready for consumption, about 108-109 cfu/g of propionic acid bacteria are present. Propionibacteria are Gram-positive, non-motile, non-sporulating and appear under the microscope as short rods which grow at low oxygen concentrations only (anaerobic to aerotolerant), and occur naturally in the rumen and intestine of ruminants, in soil and in silage (Fig. 2). Strain diversity of the natural propionibacterium flora is great which, fortunately, has not been influenced by the wide use of commercially available cultures (Fessler, 1997). They are sensitive to salt and grow optimally at a pH between 6 and 7 (maximum 8.5, minimum 4.6). The optimal growth temperature is 30 ~ but growth occurs also at 14 ~ They develop well in cheese from low numbers, but do not grow in milk (Piveteau et al., 2000). The propionibacterial metabolism in cheese is rather complex and not yet fully understood (Crow et al., 1988" FrOhlich-Wyder et al., 2002). Three different metabolic pathways (Fig. 3) have been described for the utilisation of lactate as an energy source and aspartate as an electron acceptor, both of which are available in cheese (Brendehaug and Langsrud, 1985; Crow and Turner, 1986; Crow, 1986b). In the presence nf a~partale, the [ermentntinn of lnrtnto i~ rn,,plocl with the fermentation of aspartate to succinate and no propionate is produced. Consequently, more lactate is fermented to acetate and CO2 than to propionate. The role of pathway B (formation of succinate by fixation
Propionic acid fermentation
Nowadays, selected propionibacteria of the species P. freudenreichii are used in the manufacture of cheeses with propionic acid fermentation in order to achieve the characteristic eyes and nutty flavour. For Emmental cheeses, the inoculum size is very small (only a few hundred colony forming units (cfu) per vat containing
Scanning electron micrograph of a culture of Propionibacterium freudenreichfi (Source: Swiss Federal Dairy Research Station, CH-3003 Berne).
Cheeses with Propionic Acid Fermentation
143
(A) Classical propionic acid fermentation: 3 mol lactate ~
2 mol propionate + 1 mol acetate + 1 mol CO 2 + l m o l A T P
(B) Formation of succinate during propionic acid fermentation by CO2-fixation: 3 mol lactate ~
(2 - x) mol propionate + 1 mol acetate + (1 - x) mol CO 2 + x mol succinate
Wood-Werkman pathway
(C) Fermentation of aspartate to succinate during propionic acid fermentation: 3 mol lactate + 6 mol aspartate ~
3 mol acetate + 3 mol CO 2 + 6 mol succinate + 6 mol NH 3 + 3 mol A T P
Metabolic pathways for the utilisation of lactate by propionic acid bacteria according to Crow and Turner (1986) and Sebastiani and Tschager (1993).
of CO2) is certainly of minor importance, but it has not yet been clarified (Sebastiani and Tschager, 1993). Propionibacterial strains can differ markedly in their aspartase activity (Richoux and Kerjean, 1995). In the manufacture of Emmental cheese, the use of cultures with differing aspartase activity leads to different products (Wyder et al., 2001). Tables 1 and 2 show clearly the characteristics of Emmental cheeses made with propionibacteria with either strong or weak aspartase activity. Propionibacteria with weak aspartase activity are able to metabolise not more than 100 nmol aspartate per minute in vitro (Fr0hlich-Wyder et al., 2002). These strains metabolise lactate mainly by the classical pathway (A) and deaminate only little aspartate (Fig. 3). Strains with high aspartase activity are able to metabolise up to 8 0 0 n m o l aspartate per minute in vitro. During the ripening of Swiss-type cheese, aspartate is metabolised rapidly and L-lactate is used preferentially (Crow, 1986a; Piveteau et al., 1995). As an effect, usually all available aspartate is metabolised to succinate (Fig. 4) and lactate, preferentially the isomer L, is metabolised to propionate, acetate and CO2 (Tables 1 and 4). A comparison with other traditional cheese varieties from Switzerland, which do not undergo a propionic acid fermentation, reveals that the content of aspartate is always much lower and that of succinate much higher in Emmental cheeses (Sieber et al., 1988). A strong aspartase activity is generally coupled with a stronger growth rate of propionibacteria, leading to higher counts and higher concentrations of propionate, acetate and CO2 (Table 1). Piveteau et al. (1995) showed that the growth rate and yield of propionibacteria in whey can be enhanced by the addition of aspartate. Yet it is not possible to answer the question whether aspartase activity is the cause or just an indicator. The appearance of Emmental cheese is greatly affected by the aspartase activity of the propionibacteria used. Figure 5 shows clearly the outer appearance
of different Emmental cheeses. The number and size of eyes and the height of loaves are greater for cheeses made with a culture with strong aspartase activity (Table 2) as a result of increased CO2 release (Table 1). The storage time for the cheeses in the warm room may be shortened by up to 10 days (Fr0hlich-Wyder et al., 2002). Such cheeses are more prone to late fermentation which is not desired when the cheeses are ripened for a longer time (Bachmann, 1998a). Late fermentation is a resumption of the propionic acid fermentation during maturation. The intensity of taste, odour and aroma is also more pronounced compared to cheeses made with propionibacteria of low aspartase activity (Table 2). The main reason appears to be the higher concentrations of free short chain acids produced through fermentation as well as the free fatty acids, n-butyric and n-caproic acids, released by lipolytic activity of propionibacteria (Table 1). Thus, propionibacteria with strong aspartase activity accelerate the ripening process. This is a 15'I
lo'
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
E
o~
5
0
0
7
Asp + Asn (mmol/kg) Linear regression, with a 95% confidence interval, of succinate and sum of aspartate (Asp) and asparagine (Asn) in 6-month-old Emmental cheese (T, propionibacteria with high aspartase activity; A, propionibacteria with weak aspartase activity) (Wyder et al., 2001).
144
Cheeses with Propionic Acid Fermentation
Mean values of metabolites, proteolytic parameters and propionibacterial counts in Emmental cheese (6 and 12 months) made with propionibacteria with weak or strong a s p a r t a s e activity (Wyder et aL, 2001 )
Emmental cheeses at 6 months Parameter
Weak (N = 10)
Lactate a L(+)-Lactate a pH Free S C A a Acetate a Propionate a n-Butyrate a n-Caproate a Succinate a 002 a Propionibacteriab Total nitrogenc WSN a TCASN a Free a m i n o acids a Aspartate a Asparagine a
57.4 31.1 5.75 114.4 48.4 60.1 1.1 0.4 4.0 27.6
_ 10.5 _ 9.3 _ 0.02 +_ 5.2 ___ 1.3 ___4.4 _+ 0.2 +_ 0.1 _+ 0.6 _ 1.6 nd 3.17 _ 0.06 693.4 _ 33.5 469.2 _ 46.6 169.02 _ 23.72 2.219 +_ 0.861 2.863 +_ 1.100
Strong (N = 8) 45.3 17.0 5.79 126.0 53.1 67.1 1.2 0.5 11.9 33.6 3.20 720.4 470.4 165.58 0 0.125
_+ 17.4 _+ 8.9 +_ 0.02 _+ 5.2 _+ 5.1 _ 10.2 _+ 0.1 _+ 0.1 _+ 1.7 +_ 2.0 nd __ 0.07 _ 26.1 _+ 40.1 +_ 30.20 +_ 0 _ 0.237
Emmental cheeses at 12 months t-test
Weak (N = 10)
ns ** ** ns * ns ns * *** *** ns ns ns ns *** ***
47.0 25.4 5.63 117.4 47.6 63.2 1.7 0.5 5.1 6.7 3.16 901.0 682.6 266.92 4.834 1.886
+_ 8.5 _+ 8.1 _+ 0.06 +_ 5.9 _+ 0.6 _ 4.2 _+ 0.9 _+ 0.1 ___2.8 nd _ 0.9 _ 0.08 _ 28.3 _+ 50.3 +_ 34.51 +_ 0.585 _ 0.494
Strong (N = 8) 11.3 2.9 5.73 148.1 58.7 83.6 1.7 0.7 17.7 8.4 3.21 926.3 687.3 246.86 0.588 0.054
_+ 6.7 _+ 2.4 _ 0.02 _+ 5.0 _+ 1.7 _ 3.6 _+ 0.1 +_ 0.1 +_ 2.5 nd _ 0.3 __ 0.06 _ 28.7 _+ 46.8 +_ 22.95 _+ 0.097 _+ 0.154
t-test *** *** *** *** *** *** ns ** *** *** ns ns ns ns *** ***
a mmol/kg. b log CFU/g. c mol/kg. SCA, Short Chain Acids; WSN, Water-soluble N; T C A S N , 12% TCA-soluble N; nd, not determined; ns, not significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
combined effect of aspartate metabolism and of the lncreaseu numt)er of proplonlDacterla." - :' ....... " For the application of propionibacterial cultures in cheese production, their ability to utilise aspartate must be taken into consideration. Excessive aspartase activity has hidden dangers, such as late fermentation, as mentioned above; a moderate activity, however, may influence the quality of Emmental cheese positively, e.g., improving openness, increasing the intensity of flavour and reducing the maturation time. _9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
.
.
.
Interactions
.
In Emmental cheese, interactions between propionibacteria and factors such as the type of lactic acid bacteria, season of milk production (feeding) and proteolysis have a major impact on the propionic acid fermentation. Nowadays, it is easy to control the propionic acid fermentation during the ripening of Emmental cheese. Since the introduction of starter lactic acid bacteria in the 1970s, of facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli in 1989 and of propionibacteria cultures with weak aspartase activity in 1996, the defect of late fermentation has been practically eliminated in Switzerland. Nevertheless, it is still possible to produce Emmental cheese with eyes made to measure (Fig. 6) - large eyes are achievable with the use of Lb. helveticus together with a strongly aspartase-positive propionibacteria culture. Small eyes are obtained through the use of facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli together with a weakly aspartase-positive propionibacteria culture. Feeding season
E m m e n t a l c h e e s e (12 m o n t h s old) m a d e with prop i o n i b a c t e r i a with strong (no. 2 6 - 2 7 ) or w e a k (no. 25) aspartase activity ( W y d e r et al., 2001).
Cheeses made from milk produced during the hayfeeding season (winter) are, from experience, more prone to the defect of late fermentation during ripening than cheeses made from milk produced during the grass-feeding season (summer). Cheese producers
Cheeses with Propionic Acid Fermentation
145
Sensory and quality parameters of Emmental cheese (6 and 12 months) made with propionibacteria with weak or strong aspartase activity (mean values and t-test)
Emmental cheeses of 12 months
Emmental cheeses of 6 months Parameter (Index)
Weak (N = 10)
Strong (N = 8)
t-test
Weak (N = 10)
Strong (N = 8)
t-test
Openness (1-6) Number of eyes (0-5) Size of eyes (1-5) Texture (1-6) Firmness (2-8) Maturity (2-8) Intensity of taste (1-6) Intensity of odour (0-7) Intensity of aroma (0-7) Sweetness (0-7) Saltiness (0-7) Sourness (0-7) Bitterness (0-7) Height of cheese (cm)
5.3 4.7 4.9 5.4 4.9 4.4 4.3 3.0 3.1 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.8 19.1
4.6 5.3 5.8 5.5 4.6 5.3 4.7 3.3 3.5 2.2 2.3 2.2 1.7 21.3
* * ** ns ns * ns ns *** ns ** ns ns *
4.6 4.4 4.5 5.3 4.6 6.5 4.5 3.6 3.7 2.5 2.3 2.6 1.8 18.1
4.6 5.4 5.8 5.0 4.7 6.8 4.4 3.5 3.8 2.4 2.5 2.8 1.9 20.6
ns *** *** ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns **
+_ 0.6 _ 0.6 _ 0.3 +_ 0.4 _ 0.4 _+ 0.8 _ 0.5 _+ 0.3 _+ 0.2 _ 0.2 + 0.3 _+ 0.2 +_ 0.4 _ 1.5
+_ 0.6 _ 0.4 +_ 0.6 +_ 0.3 _ 0.5 _+ 0.6 _+ 0.3 ___0.3 _+ 0.2 _+ 0.1 _ 0.2 _ 0.2 + 0.4 +_ 1.7
_+ 0.6 _+ 0.6 _ 0.5 _+ 0.7 _+ 0.6 _+ 0.5 _+ 0.6 _ 0.3 _+ 0.4 _+ 0.3 _+ 0.2 _+ 0.3 _+ 0.4 _+ 1.8
_ 0.8 _ 0.3 _ 0.6 _+ 0.6 _+ 0.4 ___0.4 _+ 0.5 _+ 0.3 _ 0.3 _+ 0.2 _+ 0.3 _ 0.4 _+ 0.2 _+ 1.0
ns, not significant. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001: index indicate the range of appreciation (lowest number = lowest possible score; highest number = highest possible score).
generally observe a slightly slower rate of acidification of the winter milk, resulting in a higher content of water and thus a higher content of lactate in the cheese after 24 h and consequently a lower pH (Table 3). A low pH leads to a slower propionic acid fermentation, since the optimum pH range for propionibacteria is 6-7. Only with proteolysis, a change in pH can be anticipated. Thus, a higher number of propionibacteria is needed in order to start the propionic acid fermentation under this disadvantageous pH. This may be the cause for higher propionibacteria counts which lead to more lactate consumption and therefore more
propionic acid and CO2 production (Table 4). Due to a higher water content, proteolysis is also enhanced. As mentioned above, this is advantageous for the pH but also for the liberation of amino acids, such as asparagine and aspartate, which are substrates for the metabolism of aspartase-positive propionibacteria (Fr6hlich-Wyder et al., 2002). Facultatively heterofermentive lactic acid bacteria Facultatively heterofermentative non-starter lactobacilli are used in the Swiss artisanal cheese industry to slow down the propionic acid fermentation (Sollberger and
X-rays of 180-day-old Emmental cheese produced with strong aspartase-positive propionibacteria and Lb. helveticus (left) or with weak aspartase-positive propionibacteria and facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli (right) (from Fr6hlich-Wyder et aL, 2002).
146
Cheeses with Propionic Acid Fermentation
Water, lactate, pH and proteolytic parameters for Emmental cheese (Fr6hlich-Wyder et al., 2002)
Factor
Feeding Grass Hay Propionibacteria Weak Strong
Water
Lactate
(g/kg)
(mmol/kg)
TN
WSN
NPN
Free AA
pH
(g/kg)
(% TN)
(% WSN)
(mmol/kg)
N
1d
180 d
1d
180 d
180 d
180 d
180 d
180 d
180 d
16 16
372.5 373.9
326.2 331.4
125.6 131.3
26.9 25.5
5.83 5.72
46.5 44.7
23.2 25.0
61.9 64.6
175.5 199.1
16 16
372.9 373.5
328.2 329.4
128.3 128.6
34.5 17.9
5.77 5.78
45.5 45.6
24.6 23.6
63.1 63.2
196.8 177.8
16 16
372.9 373.5
328.9 328.7
128.9 127.9
51.2 1.2
5.76 5.79
45.6 45.6
24.5 23.7
63.3 63.0
191.9 182.7
16 16
372.8 373.6
328.5 329.1
127.9 129.0
25.4 26.9
5.78 5.77
45.6 45.6
24.0 24.2
64.5 61.8
196.0 178.5
-
. . . . . . . . . *** *. . . . . -
Lb. casei
Added Not added Lb. helveticus
Added Not added ANOVA Feeding Propionibacteria
. -
Lb. casei Lb. helveticus
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
**
-
** * -
-, not significant. * p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. TN, total N; WSN, water soluble N; NPN, non-protein N; AA, amino acids.
Free short-chain acids (FSCA), succinate and citrate in mmol/kg, as well as propionibacteria (PAB) and facultatively heterofermentative lactobacilli (FHL) in log cfu/g in 180-day-old Emmental cheese (n = 16 for each factor level) (Fr6hlich-Wyder et aL, 2002) Factor
Feeding Grass Hay Propionibacteria Weak Strong
C1
C2
C3
C4
C6
FSCA
Succinate
Citrate
FHL
PAB
1.7 2.4
41.5 51.6
75.8 88.7
0.87 1.17
0.32 0.36
120.4 144.4
9.8 10.4
4.2 3.3
7.24 7.23
8.12 8.03
2.3 1.8
43.3 49.8
76.6 87.9
1.03 1.02
0.32 0.36
123.8 141.0
4.2 15.9
3.8 3.7
7.30 7.17
7.56 8.59
3.5 0.6
47.3 45.8
68.6 95.9
1.05 0.99
0.33 0.35
121.1 143.7
9.3 10.8
0.2 7.4
7.53 6.94
7.95 8.20
2.2 1.9
47.3 45.9
82.0 82.5
1.02 1.02
0.34 0.34
133.0 131.8
10.2 9.9
3.6 3.9
7.30 7.17
7.97 8.18
Lb. casei
Added Not added Lb. helveticus
Added Not added ANOVA Feeding Propionibacteria
. .
Lb. casei Lb. helveticus
*** .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. ***
.
.
m
-
.
.
-
.
-, not significant. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. C1, formate; C2, acetate; C3, propionate; C4, butyrate; C6, caproate.
m
a
m
B
m
C h e e s e s with P r o p i o n i c A c i d F e r m e n t a t i o n
Wyder, 2000). Jimeno et al. (1995) found growth inhibition of propionibacteria in cheese of up to 80% compared to the control without facuhatively heterofermentative lactobacilli (Lb. casei and Lb. rhamnosus). As a consequence, less propionic acid is produced. The observed inhibition could not be reproduced in co-cultures, suggesting that bacteriocin production is not responsible for this effect. Citrate metabolism most probably plays the key role, since citrate-negative mutants were shown to inhibit propionibacteria much less than the corresponding citrate-positive strains (Jimeno, 1997). Lb. rhamnosus also produces small but appreciable amounts of diacetyl which has a lethal effect on propionibacteria. Acetate and formate seem to have an inhibitory effect on the growth of propionibacteria. In addition, the metabolism of citrate, which takes place before the propionic acid fermentation, leads to the release of the complexed copper. The ratio of citrate and copper plays an important role in the observed inhibition (Perez et al., 1987). However, the mechanism of inhibition is not yet conclusively clarified. Since the introduction of cultures of facuhatively heterofermentative non-starter lactobacilli in Switzerland in 1989, the defect of late fermentation has decreased considerably. Propionibacteria with differing aspartase activity are not inhibited in the same way, a fact already known by cheesemakers. A weak aspartase-positive culture together with Lb. casei requires a prolonged period in the warm room for Emmental cheese while a strong aspartase-positive culture without the addition of facuhatively heterofermentative lactobacilli leads to a shorter stay. Thus, propionibacteria with weak aspartase activity are inhibited much more than propionibacteria with strong aspartase activity. The question arises as to whether the weakly aspartase-positive propionibacteria are more sensitive to formate and acetate. The interaction in Fig. 7 shows that both cultures produce approximately the same amount of propionic acid after 180 days of maturation, but with the addition of Lb. casei, the propionibacteria with weak aspartase activity produce much less propionic acid. This is why propionibacteria with strong aspartase activity are generally more prone to provoke late fermentation. Lb. helveticus
Proteolysis is very important for the development of the texture and flavour characteristics of Emmental cheese. Intensified proteolysis generally leads to accelerated ripening of the product which is desired as long as no adverse effect on the storage quality is encountered. In Emmental cheese production, strong proteolysis, together with intense propionic acid fermentation, may,
147
100 -
Icn
90 -
m O
E 80E c-
70-
-"
Prop96
---1- Prop90
O .m O
a_ 6 0 50-
no
yes
I
I
Addition of Lb. casei Two-way interaction between propionibacteria with different aspartase activity and Lb. casei for propionate in 180day-old Emmental cheese (Prop96, weak aspartase activity; Prop90, strong aspartase activity) (Fr6hlich-Wyder et al., 2002).
however, be the primary cause of late fermentation (Bachmann, 1998a; Baer and Ryba, 1999). The texture which becomes shorter and crumbly during proteolysis shows a loss of elasticity and the cheese can develop cracks because of excessive CO2 production. Several investigations have shown that thermophilic lactic acid bacteria, especially Lb. delbruechii and Lb. helveticus, can stimulate the growth of propionibacteria (Perez et al., 1987; Piveteau et al., 1995; Chamba, 2000; Kerjean et al., 2000). Baer (1995) found poor growth of propionibacteria in milk alone or with added rennet, but good growth in the presence of lactic acid bacteria alone or with added rennet. It was concluded that the growth of propionibacteria depends on the presence of free amino acids or small peptides. In later work, Baer and Ryba (1999) found that propionibacteria clearly prefer free amino acids to peptides. They concluded that the growth of propionibacteria, and thus the intensity of propionic acid fermentation and the risk of late fermentation, is correlated with the amount of free amino acids. In fact, Lb. helveticus is responsible for the liberation of a larger quantity of small peptides in Emmental cheese (Table 3, NPN, % of WSN). Piveteau et al. (1995) described the liberation of a heat-resistant stimulatory compound by Lb. helveticus which might be an aspartate or a peptide containing it. In contrast, the absence of nutrients is not the reason why propionibacteria fail to grow in milk when inoculated at NaC1 > protein > fat > moisture (Zaki, 1990). The textural characteristics of fresh Domiati (UF or traditional) cheese are significantly different. Ultrafiltration-Domiati is harder and more adhesive than the traditional cheese, while the latter is more chewy
Cheese Varieties Ripened in Brine
and gummy (Gomaa, 1990). Both types of cheese increase in hardness, adhesiveness and gumminess during the early stages of ripening, followed by a decrease in these parameters after 3 months of ripening in brine. However, traditional Domiati is more elastic than UFDomiati throughout ripening (Gomaa, 1990). It seems that the increase in the textural parameters during early ripening is related to the decrease in moisture and pH, leading to a firmer texture. During the latter stages, changes in texture are related more to changes in the protein matrix, due to proteolysis, particularly of Otsl-casein, and the loss of Ca. The textural parameters of Domiati are also related to the method of storage, i.e., in pouches without brine or in brine in cans. Cheese stored in pouches is significantly harder, more cohesive and gummy than cheese stored in brine (Gomaa, 1990). Also, the hardness of Domiati made from milk supplemented with whey protein concentrate (WPC) decreases as the level of WPC is increased (Gomaa, 1990). The hardness of flesh UF-Domiati can be controlled by changing the homogenization pressure, heat treatment and pH of the pre-cheese (A1-Khamy, 1988). Increasing the homogenization pressure and heat treatment, and reducing the pH of the pre-cheese increase the hardness of flesh UF-Domiati cheese (A1-Khamy, 1988). Electron microscopy of ultra-thin sections of Domiati (Abd E1-Salam and E1-Shibiny, 1973; Hofi et al., 2001) indicates that the internal structure of fresh cheese is a framework of spherical casein aggregates held together by bridges and occluding fat. On storage in brine, the casein aggregates dissociate into smaller spherical particles, forming looser structure. Differences have been observed in the microstructure of traditional and UF-Domiati (Hofi et al., 2001). The protein matrix of UF-Domiati is characterized by denser and bigger protein aggregates in which whey proteins are included with casein in the protein matrix. Additional proof that changes occur in the microstructure of Domiati cheese during storage was provided by scanning electron microscopy (Kerr et al., 1981; Zaki, 1990). The high salt content has little effect on the morphological characteristics of the surface of the cheese and fat globules per se are unlikely to be changed during storage. Most of the changes occur in the protein matrix. In fresh Domiati, hydrophobic interactions between casein molecules seem to be dominant and overcome the repulsive forces from the negatively charged protein matrix due to the relatively high pH (>5.8) of the cheese. The partial exchange of Na + for Ca 2+ weakens the strong interactions in the casein aggregates.
233
Microbiology Micro-organisms present Lactic acid bacteria are predominant in Domiati; lactococci grow during early storage and later lactobacilli (Naguib et al., 1974; Shehata et al., 1984). Salt-tolerant enterococci are the predominant cocci (94.5% of isolated cocci) in ripened Domiati (Hemati et al., 1998). Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, Lc. lactis subsp, lactis, Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris, Lb. casei, Lb. plantarum, Lb. brevis, Lb. fermentum, Lb. delbruekii subsp, lactis, Lb. alimentarius, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp, cremoris, Brevibacterium linens and Propionibacterium jensenii have been found in Domiati cheese (Naguib, 1965; Shehata et al., 1984; E1Zayat et al., 1995). Yeasts of the genera Trichosporon,
Saccharomyces, Pichia, Debaryomyces, Hansenula, Torulopsis, Endomycopsis and Cryptococcus are also found in Domiati (Ghoniem, 1968; Seham et al., 1982). Effect of manufacturing and ripening on cheese micoflora Raw milk Domiati generally has a higher bacterial count than cheese made from pasteurized milk during the first month of ripening, but cheeses made from both milks have similar counts thereafter (Naguib etal., 1974). The total microbial count increases rapidly to a maximum after a week of storage and then declines. Lactococci behave similarly, but disappear after 2-3 months of ripening. Lactobacilli reach a maximum after 2-4 weeks and then decrease gradually (Helmy, 1960; Naguib et al., 1974). The high salt content of the cheese milk reduces the total microbial and groups counts in Domiati (Shehata etal., 1984). Micrococci and lactobacilli are equally important in Domiati with a high salt content (Helmy, 1960). Starters Traditionally, starters are not used in the manufacture of Domiati cheese. Several attempts have been made to isolate salt-tolerant organisms from ripened Domiati for use as starters. These include Enterococcus faecalis, Pedicoccus spp., Lb. mesenteroides and Lb. casei (E1Gendy etal., 1983). The enterococci isolated from Domiati cheese have high esterolytic and autolytic activities and they can grow well in a medium with 9.5-10.0% NaC1 (Hemati et al., 1997). They are considered to be suitable starters for Domiati made from pasteurized milk. Survival of harmful organisms The presence of coliforms in Domiati is related to the level of salt added to the cheese milk. Not less than 9.5% NaC1 should be added to milk to suppress the growth of coliforms in Domiati made from raw milk (E1-Sadek and Eissa, 1956; Hegazi, 1972).
234
Cheese Varieties Ripened in Brine
Campylobacter spp. are present in Domiati, but C. jejuni has not been detected (E1-Nokrashy et al., 1998). However, added C. jejuni can survive for 21 days in Domiati made with or without Lb. casei as starter. Listeria monocytogenes remains viable in Domiati depending on the pH, NaC1 content and storage temperature. Storage in brine for 60 days at 20-25 ~ is recommended to ensure product safety (Tawfik, 1993). Aeromonas spp. (A. caviae, A. hydrophila, A. sobria) are found in Domiati (El-Prince, 1998). Clostridium spp. are found in Domiati made from pasteurized milk without the addition of starters. The species isolated are predominantly CI. tyrobutyricum and CI. perfringens (Naguib and Shauman, 1973). Bacillus cereus has been isolated from Domiati (E1Nawawy et al., 1981). Staphylococcus aureus can tolerate up to 15% NaC1 in Domiati but its enterotoxin has not been detected in this cheese (Ahmed et al., 1983). Salmonella typhi can survive for up to 16 days in Domiati made from milk containing 10% NaC1 (Naguib et al., 1979). Defects Early blowing is the principal defect in Domiati cheese, particularly that made from raw milk. It is characterized by the formation of gas holes in the cheese, a spongy texture and blowing of the tins. This defect arises from two factors: gas-forming yeasts or coliforms (Hegazi, 1972; E1-Shibiny etal., 1988) or electrolytic corrosion of tins by NaC1 and developed acidity (Abo Elnaga, 1971).
Introduction
One of the most famous cheeses ripened in brine is, undoubtedly, Feta, which has been produced in Greece since Homeric time (Anifantakis, 1991). Feta is the principal cheese produced in Greece and, in most cases, 'Feta' is synonymous with cheese in Greece. Feta represents over 50% of the total cheese consumed in Greece. The name Feta, which means 'slice' in Greek, has probably come from the original shape of the cheese or from the property which allowed it to be sliced without falling apart. Over the past 30-40 years, the name Feta has acquired an important trade value and, nowadays, it is used to designate many cheeses ripened in brine, which are made from different kinds of milk, using various technologies, even uhrafihrated cows' milk. Of course, the flavour and other sensory qualities of these cheeses does not equate to those of the original Feta cheese.
Manufacture
Milk The most suitable milk for the manufacture of Feta is sheep's milk, but also mixtures of sheep's milk with not more than 30% goats' milk are used. Milk is filtered and standardized to about 6% fat. The ratio of casein to fat is usually 0.7-0.8:1. The pH of the milk should be >-6.5. Heat treatment The majority of cheese milk for Feta is pasteurized (72 ~ 2 1 5 15-20s or 6 5 ~ However, in small enterprises and on farms, the cheese milk is either processed raw or receives a thermal treatment lower than pasteurization. Following heat treatment, the milk is cooled to 32-34 ~ and, if pasteurized, a 40% solution of CaC12 is added at a level of 200 ml/100 kg milk. Starter culture Starters used are a combination of lactic acid bacteria. A yoghurt culture (Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus, 1:1) or 24 h-old yoghurt was used traditionally, but have been gradually replaced partly by other commercial cultures capable of a higher acidification rate, e.g., Lactococcus lactis subsp, lactis and Lb. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus (1:3), Lc. lactis subsp, lactis and Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris. The culture is added to the cheese milk at a level of 0.5-1.0% (v/v) and incubated for 20-30 min before the addition of rennet. Coagulation Coagulation is performed at 32-34 ~ The quantity of the coagulant is regulated so that the coagulum is ready for cutting in 45-50 min. In large- and mediumsized factories, commercial calf rennet is used. In small enterprises and in mountainous areas, the traditional rennet (rennet paste) made from the abomasa of unweaned lambs and kids is used commonly alone or in combination with commercial calf rennet. Cutting and draining The coagulum is cut crossways into cubes of 2-3 cm and left for about 10 min for partial whey exudation. Then, the curds are ladled into perforated moulds, gradually in order to assist draining. The gradual transfer of the curds leads to the formation of small, almond-shaped openings in the cheese mass, which is a characteristic of the structure of Feta cheese. Moulds are cylindrical of various dimensions when the cheese is to be packed in barrels and rectangular (23 • 23 • 20-25 cm) when it is to be packed in tinplated cans (tin cans). The curds are left to drain in the moulds at 14-16 ~ without pressing for 2-3 h
Cheese Varieties Ripened in Brine
and the moulds are then inverted and left for another 2-3 h to complete draining.
Salting When the curd is firm enough, the mould is removed and the curd is cut into two (23 • 11.5 cm) or four (11.5 • 11.5 cm) pieces, which are placed close together on a salting table, the surface of which has already been sprinkled with coarse cooking salt (particles of the size of rice grains). The upper surface of the pieces is also sprinkled with salt which penetrates slowly into the curd mass. Every 12 h, the cheese pieces are inverted and the surface is dry-salted again. This procedure is repeated until the cheese contains about 3.0-3.5% salt. Following salting, the cheese blocks remain on the table for a few more days until a slime of bacteria, yeast and some moulds starts to develop on the surface. Dry salting and slime formation are essential for the development of characteristic Feta flavour during ripening. Before packaging, the slime is washed off from the surface of the cheese using a soft brush and water or brine. Nowadays, in large factories, moulding, draining and salting are performed mechanically. The curds are transferred by gravity to the moulds. The moulds on a belt conveyor pass under a special outlet of the cheese vat and are filled automatically by gravity (no pumps are used). After about 2 h, the palettes supporting the moulds are inverted to complete draining. Then, the curd is cut to the dimensions of the final cheese and dry-salted. Next morning, the cheese pieces are layered in tin-plated cans. The bottom of the can and the surface of each layer of cheese are sprinkled with coarse salt (rice grain size). After about 2 days, the cheese pieces are packed in the final container (tin-plated can).
Packaging Wooden barrels (kegs) were the traditional containers for Feta. However, handling a filled barrel (--~50 kg) is difficult. Nowadays, Feta is packaged mostly in tinplated cans weighting "--19 kg (net weight of cheese: ---16 kg), making the transportation easier and more economical. The cost of the barrels is also higher than that of tin-plated cans but the cheese develops a stronger and spicier flavour than when packed in tin-plated cans.
Ripening Cheese pieces are tightly packed in the tin-plated cans, allowing little space between them. Brine (6-8% NaC1 in water) is added to the container to fill the space between pieces and to cover the surface of the cheese. Usually, the ratio of brine to cheese is 1:8 (v/w). Cheeses are kept at 16-18 ~ until the pH reaches 4.4-4.6 and the moisture decreases to less than 56% (pre-ripening period, usually 2-3 weeks). From time to time, the lid of the container is untightened to per-
235
mit escape of the gases produced by fermentation and inspection of the level of brine, which must always cover the cheese surface. This is a usual practice with cheese ripened in barrels. If not covered by brine, the surface of the cheese becomes dry, its colour changes (from snow white to ivory or even light yellow) and the growth of yeasts and moulds is possible. After the pre-ripening period, the cans of cheese are transferred to a cold room (4-5 ~ to complete ripening. Feta is permitted to be sold at not less than 2 months postmanufacture (Greek Food Code, 1998). A good quality Feta cheese may be stored, always in brine, for up to 1 year at 2-4 ~ Yield and gross composition
The average dry matter of sheep's milk is 18-20% (Alichanidis and Polychroniadou, 1996) and a cheese yield of about 25% is expected for Feta cheese (Anifantakis, 1991; Mallatou etal., 1994). However, the yield varies with the percentage of goats' milk added to sheep's milk and, also, with the season, because the composition of the milk varies with season. The compositional provisions of the Greek Food Code (1998) for Feta cheese are: maximum moisture, 56% and minimum FDM, 43%. Analyses of 60 market samples (60-180-day-old) produced throughout the cheesemaking period in four major factories showed that the average composition (g/100 g) of Feta cheese is: moisture, 54.2; FDM, 50.82; protein, 17.23; salt-in-cheese moisture, 6.27. The average pH is 4.58 (Michaelidou, 1997). Biochemistry of Feta cheese ripening
The breakdown of the main cheese constituents (protein, fat and lactose) by the action of many enzymes involved in cheese ripening is of importance, since it greatly influences the texture and flavour of the mature cheese.
Proteolysis The most complicated event during cheese ripening is, undoubtedly, proteolysis. Proteolysis in cheese is mediated by the concerted action of many proteolytic enzymes, derived from various sources. The contribution of each enzyme depends, amongst other factors, on their relative concentration and on the environment of each cheese. One of the key points for the successful manufacture of Feta cheese is the high acidification rate exerted by starter cultures and the consequent significant drop in pH from about 6.5 to 5.0 in 6-8 h during coagulation and draining, and to about 4.8 after 18-20 h from the beginning of manufacture. This ensures that more rennet is retained in Feta than in some other cheeses
236
Cheese Varieties Ripened in Brine
(Samal et al., 1993; van den Berg and Exterkate, 1993). Furthermore, the pH of Feta (about 4.5) is favourable for the proteolytic activity of chymosin and, also, is close to the pH optimum of the indigenous milk acid proteinase, cathepsin D. However, only a small part ("-8%) of the activity of this enzyme survives pasteurization (Larsen et al., 2000), and its role is expected to be of some importance only in Feta made from raw milk. Even so, since this enzyme has many of the same cleavage sites in Ors1- and [~-caseins as chymosin (Larsen et al., 1996), its activity would be overshadowed by the far higher activity of chymosin in Feta cheese. The activity of the dominant indigenous milk proteinase, plasmin, differs substantially between cheese varieties (Sousa et al., 2001). No data are available for plasmin activity in Feta. The absence of a curd-cooking step during Feta cheese manufacture, the relatively low pH and the high salt content are conditions which do not favour either the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin or the activity of the enzyme itself. Bands in the y-casein region on the electrophoretograms of Feta cheese, indicating some plasmin activity, are in most cases not strong and their intensity does not change during ripening. Proteolysis is not very intense in Feta cheese. Only about 15-18% of the TN of the cheese is soluble in water (WSN) after 60 days of ripening, reaching a value of up to 20-25% in well-ripened cheese in 120-180 days post-manufacture (Fig. 2). The main reason for this relatively low proteolysis is the short ripening period (2-3 weeks) at 16-18 ~ after which the cheese is transferred to a cold room (---4 ~ where
all biochemical reactions, including proteolysis, are slowed down. Additionally, the activity of many proteolytic enzymes, other than chymosin, is not favoured by the low pH of Feta cheese. It is worth noting that the water-soluble fraction of Feta (and other similar cheeses) contains not only the hydrolytic products of caseins (peptides and amino acids), which are soluble in water, but also some whey proteins (mainly [3-1actoglobulin and ot-lactalbumin), which remain in the curd after draining. On the other hand, as the cheese matures in brine, some of the peptides and amino acids, as well as some of the whey proteins, diffuse into the brine. Consequently, the level of WSN measured (e.g., by the Kjeldahl method) is either overestimated at the beginning of the ripening period, due to the presence of the whey proteins, or underestimated later on, due to diffusion (Katsiari et al., 2000a). Because of the diffusion process, the TN of the cheese decreases continuously during ripening and storage (Alichanidis et al., 1984; Katsiari and Voutsinas, 1994; Katsiari et al., 2000a). The rate of proteolysis in Feta cheese is high during the first 15-20 days, when the cheese is in the warm room (Fig. 2) but slows down when the cheese is transferred to the cold room (4 ~ Large amounts of low molecular weight nitrogenous compounds are produced during ripening in the warm room; at the end of this period about 60% of the WSN is soluble in 12% trichloroacetic acid (TCA-SN). The composition of this fraction changes continuously; during further ripening, it is enriched in very small peptides (130 days) or holding for a shorter time (e.g., 70 days) at higher storage temperature (e.g., 10-15 ~ (Guinee, 2002a). A more fundamental approach was described by Apostolopoulos (1994), who used lubricated squeezing flow to determine the elongational viscosity of melted LMMC at 65 ~ which can be used as a measure of the ability of the cheese to stretch and form strings. Cavella et al. (1992) used a spinning test method to objectively evaluate the stretchability of Mozzarella cheese. Horizontal (Ak etal., 1993) and vertical (Ak and Gunasekaran, 1995a) uniaxial extension methods have also been used to measure the elongational properties of LMMC. From the data presented in these reports, it appears that the horizontal method is more sensitive
260
Pasta-Filata Cheeses
than the vertical method to changes in the stretching behaviour of the cheese during 1 month of ageing.
Oiling-off. Oiling-off is caused by the release of free oil from the body of melted cheese. Excessive oilingoff results in pools of liquid fat at the surface and throughout the body of the melted cheese, giving the cheese a greasy appearance and mouthfeel that are generally regarded as undesirable. However, a moderate release of free oil contributes to desirable melting characteristics by creating a hydrophobic film on the cheese surface during baking, giving the surface a desirable sheen and, more importantly, slowing down evaporative loss of moisture. Excessive dehydration during melting, as occurs when insufficient free oil is released, results in the formation of a tough skin on the cheese surface that inhibits flow and scorches readily (Rudan and Barbano, 1998; Rudan et al., 1999). Free oil has been measured empirically by two different approaches: melting a disk of cheese on a filter paper and then measuring the area of the oil ring that diffuses into the filter paper; or melting and centrifuging the cheese to recover the free oil (Kindstedt and Rippe, 1990; Kindstedt and Fox, 1991). In general, oiling-off of Mozzarella cheese has been shown to increase with increasing fat content (Kindstedt and Rippe, 1990; Rudan et al., 1999), decreasing salt content (Rippe and Kindstedt, 1989; Kindstedt et al., 1992) and increasing time of storage and level of proteolysis (e.g., Tunick et al., 1993, 1995; Yun et al., 1993b,d,e, 1995a, 1998; Barbano et al., 1994; Renda et al., 1997; Hong et al., 1998; Poduval and Mistry, 1999). Furthermore, the release of free oil from Mozzarella cheese was reduced substantially when the milk or the cream fraction of the milk was homogenized before cheesemaking (Tunick, 1994; Rudan et al., 1998; Poduval and Mistry, 1999). Homogenization results in a much finer dispersion of fat within the cheese structure, as observed by SEM, which limits the ability of fat globules to coalesce and flow on melting. The use of a twin-screw extruder to stretch Mozzarella cheese also reduced oiling-off to a negligible level, presumably because the high shear mixing of the extruder produces a finer dispersion of the fat within the cheese structure (Apostolopoulos et al., 1994). Free oil was reduced by the addition of buttermilk solids to the cheese milk, presumably due to phospholipid-mediated enhancement of emulsification (Poduval and Mistry, 1999). Browning. Mozzarella cheese that contains both reducing sugars (i.e., lactose and galactose) and proteolysis products is susceptible to non-enzymatic (Maillard) browning reactions at high temperatures, such as that which occur during pizza baking. The browning potential of Mozzarella cheese has been evaluated
objectively by reflectance colourimetry after heating the cheese under various conditions (Johnson and Olson, 1985; Oberg et al., 1992; Barbano et al., 1994; Mukherjee and Hutkins, 1994). After heating and cooling, the cheese may be analysed for three colour indices, L '~ (light to dark), a ~ (red to green) and b '~ (yellow to blue), from which an evaluation of the intensity of browness can be made. Reduced browning potential in LMMC has been associated with lower galactose levels and the use of galactose-fermenting starter cultures (Johnson and Olson, 1985; Matzdorf etal., 1994; Mukherjee and Hutkins, 1994). Conversely, LMMC made from milk fortified with non-fat dry milk solids showed increased browning, presumably due to higher levels of lactose and galactose in the cheese (Yun et al., 1998). Directly acidified Mozzarella shows very little browning, presumably due to the absence of proteolysis products of starter culture origin (Oberg et al., 1992). Cultured Mozzarella cheese has generally been reported to increase in browning potential during ageing (Oberg et al., 1991; Barbano et al., 1994; Merrill et al., 1994; Yun et al., 1998). Presumably, increased browning is caused by the accumulation of proteolysis products and/or galactose released by non-galactose fermenting starter bacteria during ageing. Age-related changes in structure and function
Newly manufactured cultured LMMC generally melts to a tough, fibrous, chewy consistency that has limited ability to stretch and flow. Typically, it takes several weeks of storage at refrigerated temperatures before cultured LMMC attains its optimum melting characteristics (Kindstedt, 1995). Therefore, much research has been aimed at elucidating the age-related changes in the structure and function of Mozzarella cheese. However, it is important to recognize that the initial structure and functional properties of Mozzarella may vary substantially depending on the chemical composition of the cheese. Fat plays a particularly important role in the initial structure and function because the amount of fat determines the extent to which the paracasein fibers are interrupted by fat-serum columns (see Fig. 4). As the fat content of Mozzarella decreases, the volume fraction of the casein matrix increases and the para-casein strands become thicker with fewer inclusions of fat-serum channels between them (Merrill et al., 1996; McMahon et al., 1999). The abundance and size of the fat-serum channels influence the melting characteristics of the cheese because the channels act as a low viscosity lubricant which facilitates the displacement of adjacent planes of para-casein during heating (Guinee, 2002b). Consequently, cultured Mozzarella cheese with a reduced fat content initially
Pasta-Filata Cheeses
melts to a tougher, more chewy (higher apparent viscosity) and less flowable (lower meltability) consistency than Mozzarella made by the same process but with a higher fat content (Rudan et al., 1999). Furthermore, the distance separating the fat-serum channels from one another increases with decreasing fat content (Merrill et al., 1996), which restricts the ability of liquid fat globules in adjacent channels to flow and coalesce with one another to form pools of free oil. Consequently, the fat remains more finely dispersed on melting and the proportion of total fat that is released as free oil decreases with decreasing fat content (Rudan et al., 1999). The level of casein-associated calcium in the newly made cheese also plays a critical role in the initial structure and function of the cheese, as demonstrated by several recent studies in which different strategies to vary casein-associated calcium were used. Metzger et al. (2000, 2001a,b) used pre-acidification to vary the total calcium content of low-fat Mozzarella while holding other aspects of composition nearly constant. They reported that the level of water-insoluble (i.e., casein-associated) calcium decreased as the total calcium content decreased, which resulted in para-casein fibers that were less highly crosslinked with calcium and more highly solvated, the latter being evidenced by less serum expressed on centrifugation. Consequently, cheeses with less total calcium (and therefore less casein-associated calcium) had lower hardness, apparent viscosity and post-meh chewiness values immediately after manufacture, indicative of a softer cheese before heating and a less fibrous and chewy melted consistency. Several researchers (Kindstedt et al., 2001; Cortez et al., 2002; Ge et al., 2002) used a post-manufacture method to change the pH of cultured LMMC while holding other aspects of composition nearly constant. Increasing the cheese pH in the range of c. 5.0-6.5 caused a progressive increase in the amount of waterinsoluble (i.e., casein-associated) calcium and in the apparent viscosity of the cheese. Furthermore, changes in both calcium distribution and apparent viscosity were reversible when the pH of the cheese was reversed (Ge et al., 2002). These results, in combination with those reported by Metzger et al. (2001a,b), indicate that the initial cheese pH and the total calcium content independently affect the level of casein-associated calcium and, therefore, the initial structure and functional properties of Mozzarella cheese. Guinee et al. (2002) came to a similar conclusion by using direct acidification to simultaneously vary the pH and total calcium content of Mozzarella cheese. They observed that when the calcium level was typical, i.e., 28-30 mg/g protein, higher cheese pH, in the range 5.3-5.8, resulted in higher apparent viscosity, longer melt time,
261
and reduced flowability and stretchability. However, at a relatively low calcium level (e.g., 21 mg/g protein), LMMC with a high pH (i.e., 5.8) had functionality flow, stretch and apparent viscosity, at 1 day, similar to that of the control LMMC after storage at 4 ~ for 12-20 days. Furthermore, a lower total calcium content resulted in less serum expressed on centrifugation and a high degree of swelling of the para-casein fibers at the microstructural level immediately after manufacture, as observed by CSLM. From the results of the above studies, it may be concluded that initial cheese pH, in combination with the total calcium content, largely determines the amount of casein-associated calcium in the initial cheese structure. Casein-associated calcium, in turn, influences the amount of calcium crosslinking and solvation of the para-casein fibers and thus the initial cheese structure and functional characteristics. Less calcium crosslinking and greater solvation enable adjacent planes of para-casein to be displaced more readily during melting, resulting in greater meltability and stretchability and lower apparent viscosity and chewiness. Thus, the initial melting characteristics of Mozzarella cheese can vary widely, depending on the amount of caseinassociated calcium present in the cheese immediately after manufacture. During the first few weeks after the manufacture of cultured LMMC, it is well documented that meltability, stretchability and oiling-off increase, and the apparent viscosity, melt time and hardness decrease, as discussed earlier. These fairly dramatic functional changes are influenced by proteolysis that occurs concurrently during ageing, and proteolysis is clearly one of the driving forces behind the age-related changes in structure and function. For example, when proteolysis in LMMC was reduced by stretching at high temperature (i.e., cheese temperature at exit = 66 ~ the usual changes in hardness, meltabilty and apparent viscosity occurred more slowly (Yun et al., 1994a; Kindstedt et al., 1995b). Conversely, increasing the rate of proteolysis by using a more proteolytic coagulant or by storing LMMC at a higher temperature resulted in a faster decrease in the melt time and/or apparent viscosity and a faster increase in meltability (flowability) during ageing (Yun et al., 1993c,d; Guinee et al., 2002). However, proteolysis is not solely responsible for functional changes during ageing. Considerable interest has also been directed towards changes in the serum phase of Mozzarella cheese and elucidating their effects on structure and function (Kindstedt and Guo, 1998; McMahon etal., 1999). Several investigators have reported that the amount of serum expressed from cultured LMMC by centrifugation or pressing decreased from levels equivalent to c. 20-40% of the total cheese moisture immediately after manufacture
262
Pasta-Filata Cheeses
to no expressible serum after 2-3 weeks of ageing (Guo and Kindstedt, 1995; Kindstedt, 1995; Kindstedt et al., 1995b; Guo et al., 1997; Guinee et al., 2001, 2002; Kuo etal., 2001b). Thus, the water-holding capacity of cultured LMMC increases steeply during the first weeks after manufacture. Consistent with these results, data obtained using pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance suggest that a redistribution of water from a more- to less-mobile state occurs in cultured LMMC during the first 10 days of storage (Kuo et al., 2001b). McMahon et al. (1999) further demonstrated that the redistribution of water and the resulting increase in the water-holding capacity of Mozzarella cheese involved entrapped bulk water, whereas the amount of unfreezable (i.e., chemically bound) water did not change. The mechanism by which bulk water is redistributed has been elucidated using a couple of different approaches. Several studies have shown that intact caseins, especially [3-casein, and calcium are present in the expressible serum from cultured LMMC, and that their concentrations increase as the amount of serum decreases during storage (Guo and Kindstedt, 1995; Kindstedt et al., 1995b; Guo et al., 1997). These data suggested that a progressive dissociation of calcium and caseins from, and association of water with, the para-casein matrix occur over time. Guo et al. (1997) also observed that the solvation and solubilization of the para-casein matrix occurs much more slowly when
cultured LMMC contains no added salt (NaCI), as evidenced by higher amounts of expressible serum and lower concentrations of intact caseins in the serum obtained from the unsalted cheese. These investigators postulated that age-related changes in the water-holding capacity of cultured LMMC result in part from a NaCl-mediated process of swelling and solubilization of the para-casein matrix at the microstructural level. Furthermore, they suggested that the presumed microstructural swelling may be analogous to the swelling phenomenon known as 'soft rind defect' that occurs at the macrostructural level (Guo and Kindstedt, 1995; Guo et al., 1997). 'Soft rind defect' occurs when cheese is exposed to dilute salt brine (i.e., 108 cfu/g) and a high coliform count (105 cfu/g). Soluble N of 30-day-old cheese was 18.2-28.4% of total N, and FAAs reached 3.7-4.5 g/kg (Casaha et al., 2001).
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
Cacioricotta cheese is made traditionally by heating goats' milk at 95 ~ cooling it to 40 ~ and adding a Sc. thermophilus culture. Use of lower doses of rennet and variable amounts of mesophilic lactic cultures increased the yield of 15-day-old cheese from 7.39 to 7.88% on a DM basis, probably due to reduced proteolysis (0.38% NPN instead of 0.47%; Caponio et al., 2001). Lipolysis was also retarded by the modified technology, which improved the palatability of the cheese. The use of thermized milk in the manufacture of farm-made goat-milk cheese has been studied in order to improve its microbiological quality (Clementi et al., 1998). Reduced proteolysis was found in thermized milk cheese compared with raw-milk cheese. Thermization of milk reduced the 'goaty' taste and led to a slightly more bitter and salty flavour, a harder texture and a more intense white colour. High-pressure homogenization (HPH) of goats' milk at 1000 bar (100 MPa) has been compared with pasteurization and thermization in the manufacture of soft cheese (Guerzoni et al., 1999). High-pressure homogenization of milk reduced counts of most microbial groups by at least 2 log cycles. Fresh curd yields were 16.0% for raw milk, 20.7% for thermized milk, 20.3% for pasteurized milk and 32.0% for HPH milk. Lipolysis was favoured in cheeses from HPH milk, with 6.89 mg FFAs/kg compared to 5.25 mg FFAs/kg in raw-milk cheese. Proteolysis was also enhanced in cheeses made from HPH milk, which received the highest overall score from panellists. Portuguese goat cheeses
Goats' milk production in Portugal was 35 000 tonnes in 2001. The only PDO cheese in Portugal made exclusively from goats' milk is Cabra Transmontano, although other PDO cheeses such as Picante da Beira Baixa, Amarelo da Beira Baixa and Rabacal are manufactured from a mixture of goats' and ewes' milks. The production of goats' milk cheese was 1295 tonnes in 2001, and the production of cheese from mixed ewes' and goats' milks, 4791 tonnes. Cabra Transmontano is a hard cheese made from raw Serrana goats' milk, which is coagulated at 35 ~ with animal rennet. The coagulum is cut manually into irregular pieces and pressed by hand. Cheeses (fiat cylinders) are dry-salted and ripened at 5-18 ~ and 70-85% RH for a minimum of 60 days. Ripe cheese weighs 0.6-0.9 kg. No scientific information is available on this cheese variety (Freitas et al., 2000). Raba~;al cheese is manufactured with variable proportions of ewes' and goats' raw milks, although a 2:1 ratio is considered to be optimal (Delgado, 1993). Milk is coagulated at 30 ~ with animal rennet in
291
45-60 min and the coagulum is cut by hand to irregular grains. Cheeses (fiat cylinders) are pressed manually, dry-salted and ripened at 10-15 ~ and 7 0 - 8 5 % RH for 20 days. Ripe cheese weighs 0.3-0.5 kg. Sensory studies of this cheese variety describe its peculiar aroma and flavour as milky, floral and acid (Freitas et al., 2000). Picante da Beira Baixa may be manufactured from goats' or ewes' raw milk or their mixture, a 2:3 ratio being common. Milk at 28-30 ~ is coagulated with animal rennet in 40-50 min. The coagulum is cut into 1-1.5 cm cubes and pressed by hand. Cheeses (fiat cylinders) are dry-salted, stacked in groups of two or three and turned frequently. Ripening takes place at 10-18 ~ and 70-80% RH for 120-180 days. Ripe cheese weighs 0.4-1.0 kg. Picante cheese has high counts of staphylococci, up to 106 cfu/g, and coliforms, up to 108 cfu/g during the first week. Coliform counts decreased by 5-6 log cycles, and staphylococci counts by 3-4 log cycles, after 180 days in spite of an increase in pH from 4.5 to 5.2 in 9-day-old cheeses to 5.8-5.9 in ripe cheeses (Freitas et al., 1995). The predominant microbial species were identified by Freitas et al. (1996). Water-soluble N in ripe cheeses was 25-29% of total N, and NPN was 87-92% of soluble N. Residual Ors- and [~-caseins in ripe cheeses were 7-64% and 44-81%, respectively. The proportion of goats' to ewes' milk had no significant effect on cheese sensory characteristics (Freitas et al., 1997). Free amino acids of Picante cheese manufactured from different proportions of goats' and ewes' milks, animal or thistle rennets and salting once or twice were investigated by Freitas et al. (1999). The highest amount of FAAs was in cheese made using a mixture of goats' and ewes' milk (ratio of 1:4), animal rennet and salted once. Amarelo da Beira Baixa is a cheese variety similar to Picante, weighing 0.6-1.3 kg, with a straw to dark yellow rind (Freitas et al., 2000). Spanish goat cheeses
Spain is the third largest producer of goats' milk in the European Union, with 320 000 tonnes in 2001. Most of it is mixed with cows' and/or ewes' milks for the production o f - 2 0 non-PDO traditional cheese varieties, or new varieties such as Iberico cheese, manufactured from a mixture of milks of the three species with a minimum of 30% goats' milk. Technological aspects of Spanish goat cheeses have been reviewed (Franco et al., 2001). Twenty-eight varieties are made exclusively from goats' milk, although only four are PDO cheeses. In 2001, the production of PDO Majorero cheese was 352 tonnes, the production of PDO Ibores cheese began that year with 45 tonnes, and
292
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
the production of PDO Murcia and Palmero cheeses began in 2002. Majorero cheese is made in Fuerteventura, one of the Canary islands, from raw or pasteurized goats' milk. Coagulation with animal rennet takes place at 28-32 ~ in 60 min, after which the coagulum is cut to 1-cm-size grains and the whey is drained out. Cheeses are pressed, dry- or brine-salted, and ripened for 20-90 days at 12-18 ~ and a low RH. The surface is rubbed with oil, paprika or both during ripening. The shape is fiat cylindrical, and the weight 1-6 kg. In 90-day-old raw-milk cheese the DM was 83% and pH 5.44 (Fontecha et al., 1990). Two days after manufacture, coliforms and staphylococci reached 106-107 and 104-105 cfu/g, respectively, and after 90 days were less than 101 cfu/g. In 60-day-old cheese, residual Ors- and [3-caseins were 27% and 76%, respectively, and NPN was 19.0% of total N. Total FFAs reached 32.0 g/kg in 90-day-old cheese. Pasteurized milk cheese had a DM content of 61% and a pH of 5.46 on day 90 (Martin-Hern~indez et al., 1992). Residual %- and [3-caseins on day 60 were reduced to 47 and 81%, respectively, and NPN was 16.6% of total N. Total FFAs reached 6.11 g/kg in 90-day-old cheese, a much lower value than that of raw-milk cheese. Palmero, Tenerife and Conejero are traditional goat cheeses similar to Majorero made from raw milk, to which a Lc. lactis starter may be added, in different Canary islands. Tenerife cheese is a farm-house variety made from raw milk coagulated with animal rennet at 28-32 ~ in 30-60 min, of fiat cylindrical shape and weighing 0.9-1.2 kg, with an annual production close to 1500 tonnes. The DM increases slightly during ripening (46% after 2 days to 49% after 60 days) and the pH declines from 4.93 on day 2 to 4.64 on day 30, and remains constant during the second month of ripening. Coliform counts decreased from 107 cfu/g in 2-day-old cheese to 103-104 cfu/g in 60-day-old cheese, while S. aureus counts in 2-day-old cheese were 103 cfu/g and less than 10 cfu/g in 60-day-old cheese (Z~irate et al., 1997). Ibores cheese is made in Extremadura from raw milk, to which a Lc. lactis starter may be added. Milk is coagulated at 28-32 ~ in 60-90 min, generally with animal rennet. The coagulum is cut to medium-size (1-2 cm) grains. Cheeses of fiat cylindrical shape, weighing 0.7-1.2 kg, are pressed for 3-8 h, dry- or brine-salted and ripened for a minimum of 60 days. Seasonal differences have been recorded for pH, with higher values for cheeses made in winter than for those made in spring (Mas and Gonz~ilez Crespo, 1993). Cheese ripened for 60 days had a pH of 5.18, a DM of 59%, ---21% pH 4.6-soluble N as % of total N and ---10%
TCA-soluble N. In 60-day-old cheese, coliforms were 103-104 cfu/g, and coagulase-positive staphylococci less than 10 cfu/g. Lc. lactis subsp, lactis, E. faecium, Leuc. mesenteroides subsp, dextranicum and Lb. casei were the most abundant species within their respective genera (Mas et al., 2002). A total of 29 volatile compounds have been identified in Ibores cheese, including five ketones, five alcohols, two aromatic hydrocarbons, ten esters, four terpenes and one aldehyde (Sabio and Vidal AragOn, 1996). Murcia cheese is made from pasteurized milk. It may be fresh, ripened or 'al vino' (wine-cured). In fresh cheese manufacture, the milk is coagulated at 35-38 ~ in 30-60 min, the coagulum is cut and stirred, and cheeses are pressed for 2-4 h. After brinesalting, cheeses (fiat cylinders weighing 0.3-1.5 kg) are held at 4 ~ For ripened cheese manufacture, milk is coagulated at 32-33 ~ in 45-60 min with animal rennet. The coagulum is cut, stirred and heated to 35-37 ~ Cheeses (fiat cylinders weighing 1-2 kg) are pressed, brine-salted for 12h and ripened at 12-14~ and 75-85% RH for at least 21 days. Murcia cheese 'al vino' is made from washed curd. Cheeses are immersed in red wine for 30 min at the beginning of ripening, for 15-30 min on day 7, for 15-30 min on day 14, and on day 21 for a time depending on rind characteristics (Franco et al., 2001). There is no scientific information available on Murcia cheese. Gredos cheese, also called Tietar or La Vera, is farm-made from raw milk, coagulated with animal rennet at 25-30 ~ in 1.5-2.5 h. The coagulum is cut to rice-grain or smaller size, left to settle, scooped into moulds and pressed by hand. Cheeses, of flat cylindrical shape and weighing 0.8-1.2 kg, are dry-salted and ripened for 15 days at 8-10 ~ and 80-90% RH. If not consumed as fresh cheese, they are immersed in olive oil and held for 45-60 days at 8-10 ~ The pH declines from 6.27 on day 4 to 4.64 on day 45, while DM increases from 38% on day 4 to 45% on day 60. Most microbial groups reach maximum numbers after 15 days of ripening, with coliform counts of 105-106 cfu/g and coagulase-positive staphylococci counts of 102-103 cfu/g at that time. In 60-day-old cheese, coliform counts had decreased by 4 log cycles and coagulase-positive staphylococci by 2 log cycles. Residual ors- and [3-caseins were 22% and 40%, respectively, and NPN was 14.9% of total N in 60-day-old cheese (Medina et al., 1992). Cendrat del Montsec is made from raw milk inoculated with 3% Lc. lactis starter, coagulated at 15-20 ~ in 20 h using animal rennet. The coagulum is not cut, but scooped into cylindrical moulds where whey drains spontaneously for 6 - 7 h , and afterwards, cheeses weighing 1.5 kg are slightly pressed for 24 h.
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
Cheeses are dry-salted, and after 5 days are covered with oak ash. Ripening takes place at 10-15 ~ and 90-95% RH for 9 weeks. The pH increases from 4.02 in 1-day-old cheese to 4.40 in 63-day-old cheese, and the DM increases during this time from 46 to 53%. In ripe cheese, Ors-casein is almost completely degraded, but 50% [3-casein remains unaltered (Carretero et al., 1994). Due to the low pH value, coliforms and S. aureus were at low numbers (101-102 cfu/g) at the end of the ripening period (Mor-Mur et al., 1992). Valdeteja is farm-made from raw milk coagulated at 35 ~ with animal rennet in 105-120 min. The coagulum is cut to 1-cm-size grains, moulded and pressed for 12 h. Cheeses, fiat cylinders weighing 0.8-1.2 kg are dry-salted and ripened at 10-15 ~ and 70-80% RH for 30 days. During ripening, the pH declines to 5.1 on day 2 and 4.5 on day 10, and remains unchanged until day 30, while the DM is 48% on day 2 and increases to 62% on day 30. The acidity index of the fat increased from 0.89 on day 2 to 1.46 on day 30. Only 4-5% NPN of total N was found in 30-day-old cheese (Carballo et al., 1994). Armada cheese is farm-made from raw milk, to which a small amount of whey from the previous day is added, coagulated with animal rennet at 30 ~ in 60 min. The coagulum is cut, left to settle, cut again to a smaller size and scooped into cloths which are hung for 48 h. Afterwards, the curds are kneaded intensely by hand, transferred to new cloths, hung for a further 72 h and salt is added. The curds are kneaded again and moulded to cheeses, 20 cm in diameter and 20 cm high, which are wrapped in cloths and hung to ripen at 10-15 ~ and 70-85% RH for 60-120 days. During ripening, the pH declines to a minimum of 4.31-4.68 on day 7, increasing later to 4.89-5.25 on day 120, while the DM increases from 49-57% on day 7 to 75-82% on day 120 (Tornadijo et al., 1993). The NPN is 5.0% of total N on day 7 and increases to only 7.3% by day 120, whereas residual Ors- and [3-caseins were 93 and 98%, respectively, on day 120. Total FAAs increased from 2.1 g/kg on day 7 to 3.6 g/kg on day 120, and total FFAs increased in the meantime from 5.9 g/kg to 44.5 g/kg (Fresno et al., 1997). Cameros cheese is made from raw or pasteurized milk, coagulated at 32 ~ in 60 min with animal rennet. The coagulum is cut by hand, moulded in plastic baskets and slightly pressed for 8-12 h. Cheeses are dry-salted and ripened for up to 60 days at 12-14 ~ and 70-80% RH. Raw- and pasteurized-milk cheeses have been studied. A pH of 4.52-4.89 was reached on day 5, decreasing to 4.49-4.65 on day 30, followed by an increase to 4.70-4.98 on day 60. The DM was 51-56% on day 5 and increased to 79-83% on day 60. Proteolysis was slight, with only 5.0-7.7% NPN
293
of total N on day 60. In raw-milk cheese, coliform counts were less than 10 cfu/g on day 60, but numbers of S. aureus were close to 106 cfu/g on days 5-15 and still over 103 cfu/g on day 30 (Olarte etal.,
2000). Recently, extensive studies on the effects of highpressure treatment on the microbiological (Capellas etal., 1996; Buffa etal., 2001b), physico-chemical (Trujillo et al., 1999; Capellas et al., 2001; Buffa et al., 2001a; Saldo et al., 2002) and textural (Saldo et al., 2000; Buffa et al., 2001c) characteristics of goats' milk cheeses have been carried out. High-pressure treatments of cheeses at 400-500 MPa improved microbiological quality, enhanced proteolysis and resulted in a more fluid-like texture. Lipolysis in cheeses made from high-pressure-treated milk was similar to that in raw-milk cheeses, and higher than lipolysis in pasteurized-milk cheeses. Cheeses made from high-pressure-treated milk were, like raw-milk cheeses, firmer and less fracturable than pasteurizedmilk cheeses.
More than 100 cheese varieties, many of them protected by a Designation of Origin, are made from ewes' or goats' milk in Europe. This rich heritage, dating in some cases from the Middle Ages, should be maintained for cultural and socio-economic reasons. Farming of ewes and goats and transformation of their milks into cheeses contribute to the sustainable development of many regions, mostly in Mediterranean countries. The peculiar flavour and texture typical of ewes' or goats' milk cheeses can be explained partly by compositional differences in caseins and fat, distinct from those of cows' milk. In raw-milk cheeses, a diverse microbiota composed of adventitious LAB (Cogan et al., 1997), but also of bacteria other than LAB, yeasts and moulds, contribute to their distinct sensory characteristics. In order to maintain the traditional characteristics of these cheese varieties, there is a need to preserve the biological diversity involved in the ripening process of ewes' and goats' milk cheeses, by the use of authoctonous lactic starters and mould cultures in their manufacture. Recent studies on ewes' and goats' milk cheeses have considerably enlarged our knowledge of their microbiology, chemistry and texture. However, current scientific information on many varieties, some of major economic importance, is still scarce and research for the better understanding and improving of their manufacture and ripening is needed.
294
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
Albenzio, M., Corbo, M.R., Shakeel-Ur-Rehman, Fox, P.E, De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Sevi, A. and Gobbetti, M. (2001). Microbiological and biochemical characteristics of Canestrato Pugliese cheese made from raw milk, pasteurized milk or by heating the curd in hot whey. Int..]. Food Microbiol. 67, 35-48. Ambrosoli, R., Di Stasio, L. and Mazzoco, P. (1988). Content of Otsl-casein and coagulation properties in goat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 24-28. Amigo, L., Recio, I. and Ramos, M. (2000). Genetic polymorphism of ovine milk proteins: its influence on technological properties of m i l k - a review. Int. DairyJ. 10, 135-149. Anifantakis, E. (1986). Comparison of the Physico-chemical Properties of Ewes' and Cow's Milk. In Bulletin 202, International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 42-53. Anifantakis, E., Kehagias, C., Kotouza, E. and Kalantzopoulous, G. (1980). Frozen stability of sheep's milk under various conditions. Milchwissenschaft 35, 80-82. Arizcun, C., Barcina, Y. and Torre, P. (1997). Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Roncal and Idiaz~ibal cheeses. Lait 77,729-736. Battistotti, C. and Corradini, C. (1993). Italian cheese, in, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Vol. 2, 2nd edn, P.E Fox, ed., Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 221-243. Bizzarro, R., Torri-Tarelli, G., Giraffa, G. and Neviani, E. (2000). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Pecorino Toscano cheese. Ital. J. Food Sci. 3,303-316. Brennand, C.P., Ha, J.K. and Lindsay, R.C. (1989). Aroma properties and thresholds of some branched-chain and other minor volatile fatty acids occurring in milkfat and meat lipids.J. Sens. Stud. 4, 105-120. Buffa, M., Guamis, B., Pavia, M. and Trujillo, J.A. (2001a). Lipolysis in cheese made from raw, pasteurized or highpressure-treated goats' milk. Int. Dairy J. 11, 175-179. Buffa, M., Guamis, B., Royo, C. and Trujillo, A.J. (2001b). Microbiological changes throughout ripening of goat cheese made from raw, pasteurized and high-pressuretreated milk. Food Microbiol. 18, 45-51. Buffa, M., Trujillo, J.A., Pavia, M. and Guamis, B. (2001c). Changes in textural, microstructural, and colour characteristics during ripening of cheeses made from raw, pasteurized or high-pressure-treated goats' milk. Int. Dairy J. 11,927-934. Bustamante, M., Ch~ivarri, E, Santisteban, A., Ceballos, G., Hernandez, I., Miguelez, M.J., Aranburu, I., Barr6n, L.J.R., Virto, M. and De Renobales, M. (2000). Coagulating and lipolytic activities of artisanal lamb rennet pastes. J. Dairy Res. 67,393-402. Campos, R., Guerra, R., Aguiar, M., Ventura, O. and Camacho, L. (1990). Chemical characterization of proteases extracted from wild thistle (Cynara cardunculus). Food Chem. 35, 89-97. Capellas, M., Mor-Mur, M., Sendra, E., Pla, R. and Guamis, B. (1996). Populations of aerobic mesophiles and inoculated E. coli during storage of fresh goat's milk cheese treated with high pressure. J. Food Prot. 59,582-587.
Capellas, M., Mor-Mur, M., Sendra, E. and Guamis, B. (2001). Effect of high pressure processing on physico-chemical characteristics of fresh goats' milk cheese (Mat6). Int. Dairy J. 11,165-173. Caponio, E, Pasqualone, A. and Gomes, T. (2001). Apulian Cacioricotta goat's cheese: technical interventions for improving yield and organoleptic characteristics. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 213, 178-182. Carballo, J., Fresno, J.M., Tuero, J.R., Prieto, J.G., Bernardo, A. and Martfn-Sarmiento, R. (1994). Characterization and biochemical changes during the ripening of a Spanish hard goat cheese. Food Chem. 49, 77-82. Carbonell, M., Nufiez, M. and Fernandez-Garcia, E. (2002). Evolution of the volatile components of ewe raw milk La Serena cheese during ripening. Correlation with flavour characteristics. Lait 82, 683-698. Carretero, C., Trujillo, A.J., Mor-Mur, M., Pla, R. and Guamis, V. (1994). Electrophoretic study of casein breakdown during ripening of goat's milk cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42, 1546-1550. Casaha, E., Noel, Y., Le Bars, D., Carre, C., Achilleos, C. and Maroselli, M.-X. (2001). Caracterisation du fromage Bastelicaccia. Lait 81,529-546. Chavarri, E, Bustamante, M.A., Santisteban, A., Virto, M. and De Renobales, M. (1999). Changes in free fatty acids during ripening of Idiazabal cheese manufactured at different times of the year. J. Dairy Sci. 82,885-890. Clementi, E, Cenci Goga, B.T., Trabalza Marinucci, M. and Di Antonio, E. (1998). Use of selected starter cultures in the production of farm manufactured goat cheese from thermized milk. Ital. J. Food Sci. 10, 41-56. CNIEL (2002). Banque de donnees statistiques, http://www. maison-du-lait, corrgScrip ts/public/sta t. asp ?Language = FR. Cogan, T.M., Barbosa, M., Beuvier, E., Bianchi-Salvadori, B., Cocconcelli, PS., Fernandes, I., Gomez, M.J., G6mez, R., Kalantzopoulos, G., Ledda, A., Medina, M., Rea, M. and Rodriguez, E. (1997). Characterization of the lactic acid bacteria in artisanal dairy products. J. Dairy Res. 64, 409-421. Coni, E., Bocca, B. and Caroli, S. (1999). Minor and trace element content of two typical Italian sheep dairy products. J. Dairy Res. 66, 589-598. Dahl, S., Tavaria, EK. and Malcata, EX. (2000). Relationships between flavour and microbiological profiles in Serra da Estrela cheese throughout ripening. Int. DairyJ. 10, 255-262. Deiana, P., Fatichenti, E, Farris, G.A., Mocquot, G., Lodi, R., Todesco, R. and Cecchi, L. (1984). Metabolization of lactic and acetic acids in Pecorino Romano cheese made with a combined starter of lactic acid bacteria and yeast. Lait 64, 380-394. Deiana, P., Rossi, J., Caredda, M., Cattina, A.P. and Smacchi, E. (1997). Secondary microflora in Pecorino Romano cheese. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 48,487-500. Delgado, M.G.H. (1993). Physico-chemical characterization of Rabacal cheese. Via Lactea 3, 64-66. Emaldi, G.C. (1987). Goat cheeses. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 38, 46-53. Engel, E., Nicklaus, S., Septier, C., Salles, C. and Le Quere, J.L. (2000). Taste active compounds in a goat cheese watersoluble extract. 2. Determination of the relative impact of
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
water-soluble extract components on its taste using omission tests. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 4260--4267. Europa (2002). http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/foodqual/qualil_en.htm. FAOSTAT (2002). http://apps.fao.org/default.htm. Faro, C.C., Moir, AJ. and Pires, E.V. (1992). Specificity of a milk-clotting enzyme extracted from the thistle Cynara cardunculus L.: Action on oxidized insulin and K-casein. Biotechnol. Lett. 14,841-846. Fernandez del Pozo, B., Gaya, P., Medina, M., Rodr~guezMarfn, M.A. and Nufiez, M. (1988a). Changes in the microflora of La Serena ewes' milk cheese during ripening. J. Dairy Res. 55,449-455. Fernandez del Pozo, B., Gaya, P., Medina, M., Rodr~guezMarfn, M.A. and Nufiez, M. (1988b). Changes in chemical and rheological characteristics of La Serena ewes' milk cheese during ripening. J. Dairy Res. 55,457-464. Fern~indez-Garc~a, E., Lopez-Fandifio, R., Alonso, R. and Ramos, M. (1994). The use of lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes in the manufacture of cheese from ovine and bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 77,449-455. Fernandez-Garcia, E., Carbonell, M. and Nufiez, M. (2002). Volatile fraction and sensory characteristics of Manchego cheese. 1. Comparison of raw and pasteurized milk cheese. J. Dairy Res. 69,579-593. Fern~indez-Salguero, J. and Sanjuan, E. (1999). Influence of vegetable and animal rennet on proteolysis during ripening in ewes' milk cheese. Food Chem. 64, 177-183. Fernandez-Salguero, J., Barreto, J. and Marsilla, B.A. (1978). Principal nitrogen components of Serena cheese. Archivos de Zootecnia 27,365-373. Fernandez-Salguero, J., Gomez, R., Tejada, L. and Vioque, M.A. (2000). Powdered vegetable coagulant, procedure for its preparation and application to cheese-making. Spanish Patent 200.001.593. Fern~indez-Salguero, J., Tejada, L. and Gomez, R. (2002). Use of powdered vegetable coagulant in the manufacture of ewe's milk cheeses. J. Sci. Food Agric. 82,464-468. Fontecha, J., pelaez, C., Juarez, M., Requena, T., Gomez, C. and Ramos, M. (1990). Biochemical and microbiological characteristics of artisanal hard goat's cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 1150-1157. Fontecha, J., pel~iez, C., Ju~irez, M. and Martin-Hemandez, M.C. (1994). Effect of freezing and frozen storage on the physicochemical, organoleptic and microbiological characteristics of a semi-hard ewes' milk cheese.J. Dairy Res. 61,133-142. Foschino, R., Ottogalli, G. and Caserio, G. (1999). Evolution of microflora during the manufacture of Caprino Tradizionale goat cheese. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 50, 163-178. Franco, I., Prieto, B., Gonzalez, J. and Carballo, J. (2001). The Spanish traditional goat's milk cheeses: a review. Alimentaria 319, 63-82. Freitas, A.C., Sousa, M.J. and Malcata, EX. (1995). Effect of ripening time and the combination of ewe and goat milk on the microflora of Picante cheese. Ital. J. Food Sci. 7, 361-377. Freitas, A.C., Pais, C., Malcata, EX. and Hogg, T.A. (1996). Microbiological characterization of Picante da Beira Baixa cheese. J. Food Prot. 59, 155-160.
295
Freitas, A.C., Fresno, J.M., Prieto, B., Malcata, EX. and Carballo, J. (1997). Effects of ripening time and combination of ovine and caprine milks on proteolysis of Picante cheese. Food Chem. 60,219-229. Freitas, A.C., Fresno, J.M., Prieto, B., Franco, I., Malcata, EX. and Carballo, J. (1999). How milk type, coagulant, salting procedure and ripening time affect the profile of free amino acids in Picante da Beira Baixa cheese. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79,611-618. Freitas, A.C., Macedo, A.C. and Malcata, EX. (2000). Review: Technological and organoleptic issues pertaining to cheeses with denomination of origin manufactured in the Iberian Peninsula from ovine and caprine milks. Food Sci. Tech. Int. 6,351-370. Fresno, J.M., Tornadijo, M.E., Carballo, J., Bernardo, A. and Gonz~ilez-Prieto, J. (1997). Proteolytic and lipolytic changes during the ripening of a Spanish craft goat cheese (Armada variety). J. Sci. Food Agric. 75, 148-154. Gaborit, P., Menard, A. and Morgan, F (2001). Impact of ripening strains on the typical flavour of goat cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 11, 315-325. Gattuso, A.M., Pirrone, L., Seminerio, V. and Arcoleo, G. (1995). Changes of the compositive parameters in Pecorino cheeses during ripening. I. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 46, 167-177. Gaya, P., Medina, M., Rodr~guez-Marin, M.A. and Nufiez, M. (1990). Accelerated ripening of ewes' milk Manchego cheese: the effect of elevated ripening temperatures. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 26-32. Giudici, P., Scilio, G., Romano, D., Russo, C. and Migliorisi, D. (1997). Effect of technological parameters on microbial counts in Pecorino Siciliano cheese. Latte 22, 76-84. Gomez, M.J., Rodr~guez, E., Gaya, P., Nufiez, M. and Medina, M. (1999). Characteristics of Manchego cheese manufactured from raw and pasteurized ovine milk and with defined-strain or commercial mixed-strain starter cultures. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 2300-2307. Grosclaude, E, Ricordeau, G., Martin, P., Remeuf, E, Vassal, L. and Bouillon, J. (1994). Du gene au fromage: le polymorphisme de la caseine OtSl caprine, ses effects, son evolution. INRA Prod. Anita. 7, 3-19. Guerzoni, M.E., Vannini, L., Chaves Lopez, C., Lanciotti, R., Suzzi, G. and Gianotti, A. (1999). Effect of high pressure homogenization on microbial and chemico-physical characteristics of goat cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 851-862. Ha, J.K. and Lindsay, R.C. (1991a). Contributions of cow, sheep, and goat milks to characterizing branched-chain fatty acid and phenolic flavors in varietal cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3267-3274. Ha, J.K. and Lindsay, R.C. (1991b). Volatile branched-chain fatty acids and phenolic compounds in aged Italian cheese flavors. J. Food Sci. 56, 1241-1250. Hatzikamari, M., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. and Tzanetakis, N. (1999). Microbiological characteristics of Anevato: a traditional Greek cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 595-601. Heimgartner, U., Pietrzak, M., Geertsen, R., Brodelius, E, Silva Figueiredo, A.C. and Pals, M.S. (1990). Purification
296
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
and partial characterization of milk clotting proteases from flowers of Cynara cardunculus. Phytochemistry 29, 1405-1410. Hosono, A. and Sawada, M. (1995). Chemical and bacteriological properties of "Valengay", a soft goat's milk cheese. Anita. Sci. Technol. 66,422-429. Hosono, A. and Shirota, S. (1994). Chemical and microbiological studies on "Crottin de Chavignol", a soft goat's milk cheese. Anita. Sci. Technol. 65,551-555. Ib~ii~ez, E C., Torres, M.I., Ordof~ez, A.I. and Barcina, Y. (1995). Changes in physicochemical properties and in content of nitrogen compounds with traditional smoking during the ripening of Idiaz~ibal cheese. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 49,167-175. Irigoyen, A., Izco, J.M., Ibafiez, EC. and Torre, P. (2002). Influence of calf or lamb rennet on the physicochemical, proteolytic, and sensory characteristics of an ewe's milk cheese. Int. DairyJ. 12, 27-34. Izco, J.M. and Torre, P. (2000). Characterisation of volatile flavour compounds in Roncal cheese extracted by the 'purge and trap' method and analysed by GC-MS. Food Chem. 70,409-417. Izco, J.M., Irigoyen, A., Torre, R and Barcina, Y. (2000). Effect of added enzymes on the free amino acids and sensory characteristics in Ossau-Iraty cheese. Food Control 11, 201-207. Ju~irez, M. and Ramos, M. (1986). Physico-chemical characteristics of goat's milk as distinct from those of cow's milk. In Bulletin 202, International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 54-67. Kaminarides, S.E., Anifantakis, E.M. and Balls, C. (1992). Changes in Kopanisti cheese during ripening using selected pure microbial cultures. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 45, 56-59. Kandarakis, I.G., Moschopoulou, E.E., Moatsou, G.A. and Anifantakis, E.M. (1998). Effect of starters on gross and microbiological composition and organoleptic characteristics of Graviera Kritis cheese. Lait 78, 557-568. Katsiari, M.C. and Voutsinas, L.P. (1994). Manufacture of low-fat Kefalograviera cheese. Int. DairyJ. 4, 533-553. Katsiari, M.C., Alichanidis, E., Voutsinas, L.P. and Roussis, I.G. (2001). Proteolysis in reduced sodium Kefalograviera cheese made by partial replacement of NaCI with KCI. Food Chem. 73, 31-43. Lalos, G.T. and Roussis, I.G. (2000). Quality of full-fat and low-fat Kefalograviera cheese from raw and refrigerated ewe's milk. Milchwissenschaft 55, 24-26. Larr~iyoz, R, Addis, M., Gauch, R. and Bosset, J.O. (2001). Comparison of dynamic headspace and simultaneous distillation extraction techniques used for the analysis of the volatile components in three European PDO ewes' milk cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 11, 911-926. Ledda, A. (1996). Fiore Sardo, in, Artisanal European Cheeses, T.M. Cogan and M.C. Rea, eds, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. pp. 35-37. Ledda, A., Scintu, M.E, Pirisi, A., Sanna, S. and Mannu, L. (1994). Technological characterization of lactococci and enterococci for the manufacture of Fiore Sardo cheese. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 45,443-456.
Le Jaouen, J.C. and Mouillot, M. (1990). Fromages a partir de lait de chevre, in, Laits et Produits Laitiers. Vol. 2, Les Produits Laitiers. EM. Luquet, ed., Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, Paris. pp. 295-338. Lenoir, J. (1963). La flore microbienne du Camembert et son evolution au cours de la maturation. Lait 43, 262-270. Le Quere, J.-L., Pierre, A., Riaublanc, A. and Demaizieres, D. (1998). Characterization of aroma compounds in the volatile fraction of soft goat cheese during ripening. Lait 78, 279-290. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. (1990). Changes in numbers and kinds of lactic acid bacteria during ripening of Kefalotyri cheese.J. Food Sci. 55,111-115. Litopoulou-T7anetaki, E. and Tzanetakis, N. (1992). Microbiological study of white-brined cheese made from raw goat milk. Food Microbiol. 9, 13-19. Macedo, A.C., Malcata, EX., and Oliveira, J.C. (1993). The technology, chemistry, and microbiology of Serra cheese: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 1725-1739. Macedo, A.C., Malcata, EX. and Hogg, T.A. (1995). Microbiological profile in Serra ewes' cheese during ripening. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 79, 1-11. Mallatou, H., Pappas, C.R and Voutsinas, L.R (1994). Manufacture of Feta cheese from sheep's milk, goats' milk or mixtures of these milks. Int. Dairy J. 4, 641-664. Mannu, L. and Paba, A. (2002). Genetic diversity of lactococci and enterococci isolated from home-made Pecorino Sardo ewes' milk cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 55-62. Mannu, L., Paba, A., Pes, M., Floris, R., Scintu, M.E and Morelli, L. (1999). Strain typing among enterococci isolated from home-made Pecorino Sardo cheese. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 25-30. Mannu, L., Comunian, R. and Scintu, M.F. (2000). Mesophilic lactobacilli in Fiore Sardo cheese: PCR-identification and evolution during cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 10,383-389. Mannu, L., Riu, G., Comunian, R., Fozzi, M.C. and Scintu, M.E (2002). A preliminary study of lactic acid bacteria in whey starter culture and industrial Pecorino Sardo ewes' milk cheese: PCR-identification and evolution during ripening. Int. DairyJ. 12, 17-26. Marcos, A. and Mora, M.T. (1982). Proteolysis in Manchego cheese. Evolution of free amino acids. Arch Zootec 31, 115-129. Mariaca, R., Fern~indez-Garcia, E., Mohedano, A.E and Nufiez, M. (2001). Volatile fraction of ewe's milk semihard cheese manufactured with and without the addition of a cysteine proteinase. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 7, 131-139. Martfn-Hern~indez, M.C., Juarez, M. and Ramos, M. (1992). Biochemical characteristics of three types of goat cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 1747-1752. Mas, M. and Gonzalez Crespo, J. (1993). Control of pathogenic microorganisms in Ibores cheese. Alimentaria 240, 41-44. Mas, M., Tabla, R., Moriche, J., Roa, I., Gonzalez, J., Rebollo, J.E. and C~iceres, P. (2002). Ibores goat's milk cheese: Microbiological and physicochemical changes throughout ripening. Lait 82,579-587.
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
Mas Mayoral, M., Gonz~ilez Crespo, J. and Nieto Villaseca, M.J. (1991). Casar cheese: production, physicochemical and microbiological characteristics. Arch. Zootec. 40, 359-369. Masuda, T., Taniguchi, T., Yamasaki, H.R. and Morichi, T. (2000). Chemical and microbiological changes in the ripening of Sainte-Maure type cheese made from pasteurized goat's milk. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 47, 264-268. Medina, M., Fern~indez del Pozo, B.S., Rodriguez-Marin, M.A., Gaya, P. and Nul~ez, M. (1991). Effect of lactic starter inoculation on chemical, microbiological, rheological and sensory characteristics of La Serena cheese. J. Dairy Res. 58,355-361. Medina, M., Gaya, P. and Nu~ez, M. (1992). Gredos goats' milk cheese: microbiological and chemical changes throughout ripening. J. Dairy Res. 59,563-566. Mendia, C., Ib~h~ez, EJ., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (2000). Effect of pasteurization and use of a native starter culture on proteolysis in a ewes' milk cheese. Food Control 11, 195-200. Migliorisi, D., Caggia, C., Pulvirenti, A. and Giudici, P. (1997). Lactic acid bacteria in Pecorino Siciliano cheese. Latte 22, 80-86. Milkin, R., Alcal~i, M., Sanjuan, E., Penedo, J.C. and Castelo, M. (1992). Physicochemical components of Roncal cheese. Aliment. Equip. Technol. Julio-Agosto. pp. 61-65. Moatsou, G.A., Kandarakis, I.G., Georgala, A.K., Alichanidis, E.S.A. and Anifantakis, E.M. (1999). Effect of starters on proteolysis of Graviera Kritis cheese. Lait 79,303-315. Moatsu, G., Kandarakis, I., Moschopoulou, E., Anifantakis, E. and Alichanidis, E. (2001). Effect of technological parameters on the characteristics of Kasseri cheese made from raw or pasteurized milk. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54, 69-77. Mohedano, A., Fern~indez, J., Garde, S., Medina, M., Gaya, P. and Nul~ez, M. (1998). The effect of the cysteine proteinase from Micrococcus sp. INIA 528 on the ripening process of Manchego cheese. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 22, 391-396. Molimard, P. and Spinnler, H.E. (1996). Review: Compounds involved in the flavor of surface mold-ripened cheeses: origins and properties. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 169-184. Molina, E., Ramos, M., Alonso, L. and L6pez-Fandil~o, R. (1999). Contribution of low molecular weight water soluble compounds to the taste of cheeses made of cows', ewes' and goats' milk. Int. DairyJ. 9,613-621. Morgan, E and Gaborit, P. (2001). The typical flavour of goat milk products: technological aspects. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54, 38-40. Morgan, E, Bodin, J.-P. and Gaborit, P. (2001). Lien entre le niveau de lipolyse du lait de ch~vre et la qualit~ sensorielle des fromages au lait cru ou pasteurisr Lait 81,743-756. Mor-Mur, M., Carretero, C., Pla, R. and Guamis, V. (1992). A survey on the microbiological quality of a semi-soft on-farm manufactured goat cheese. Food Microbiol. 9,345-352. Nahabieh, E and Schmidt, J.L. (1990). Contribution/t l'r de la flore levure de quelques grands types de fromages de ch~vre. Lait 70,325-343.
297
N~ijera, A.I., Barr6n, L.J.R. and Barcina, Y. (1994). Changes in free fatty acids during the ripening of Idiazabal cheese: influence of brining time and smoking. J. Dairy Res. 61, 281-288. Neviani, E., Bizzarro, R., Righini, A. and Mucchetti, G. (1998). Pecorino Toscano DOP: cheesemaking technology and microbiological characteristics. Ind. Latte 34, 3-35. Nuftez, M., Medina, M. and Gaya, P. (1989). Ewes' milk cheese: technology, microbiology and chemistry. J. Dairy Res. 56,303-321. Nul~ez, M., Fern~indez del Pozo, B.S., Rodr*guez-Marin, M.A., Gaya, P. and Medina, M. (1991a). Effect of vegetable and animal rennet on chemical, microbiological, rheological and sensory characteristics of La Serena cheese. J. Dairy Res. 58, 511-519. Nuftez, M., Guillen, A.M., Rodriguez-Marin, M.A., Marcilla, A.M., Gaya, P. and Medina, M. (1991b). Accelerated ripening of ewes' milk Manchego cheese: the effect of neutral proteinases. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 4108-4118. Olarte, C., Sanz, S., Gonzalez-Fandos, E. and Torre, P. (2000). The effect of a commercial starter culture addition on an artisanal goat's cheese (Cameros cheese). J. Appl. Microbiol. 88,421-429. OrdOflez, J.A. and Burgos, J. (1980). Free amino acids of Manchego cheese ripened in olive oil. Milchwissenschaft 35, 69-71. OrdO~ez, J.A., Masso, J.A., Marmol, M.P. and Ramos, M. (1980). Contribution/l l'etude du fromage "Roncal'. Lait 60,283-294. OrdOl~ez, A.I., Ib~h~ez, EC., Torre, P. and Barcina, Y. (1998). Characterization of the casein hydrolysis of Idiazabal cheese manufactured from ovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 2089-2095. Ortigosa, M., B~ircenas, P., Arizcun, C., Perez Elortondo, EJ., Albisu, M. and Torre, P. (1999). Influence of the starter culture on the microbiological and sensory characteristics of ewe's cheese. Food Microbiol. 16, 237-247. Perez-Elortondo, EJ., Albisu, M. and Barcina, Y. (1993). Changes in the microflora of Idiaz~bal cheese with the addition of commercial lactic starters. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 48, 10-14. Perez-Elortondo, EJ., Aldamiz-Echebarria, P., Albisu, M. and Barcina, Y. (1998). Indigenous lactic acid bacteria in Idiazabal ewes' milk cheese. Int. Dairy J. 8, 725-732. Perez-Elortondo, EJ., Albisu, M. and Barcina, Y. (1999a). Physicochemical and microbiological parameters in semihard and hard ewes' milk cheeses: effect of the smoking process. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 50, 89-102. Perez-Elortondo, EJ., Albisu, M. and Barcina, Y. (1999b). Physicochemical properties and secondary microflora variability in the manufacture and ripening of Idiazabal cheese. Lait 79, 281-290. Perez-Elortondo, EJ., Albisu, M. and Barcina, Y. (2002). Brining time and smoking influence on acceptability of Idiaz~ibal cheese. J. Food Qual. 25, 51-62. Picon, A., Gaya, P., Medina, M. and Nul~ez, M. (1994). The effect of liposome encapsulation of chymosin derived by fermentation on Manchego cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 77, 16-23.
298
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
Picon, A., Gaya, P., Medina, M. and Nufiez, M. (1995). The effect of liposome-encapsulated Bacillus subtilis neutral proteinase on Manchego cheese ripening. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 1238-1247. Picon, A., Serrano, C., Gaya, P., Medina, M. and Nuflez, M. (1996). The effect of liposome-encapsulated cyprosins on Manchego cheese ripening. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 1699-1705 Pierre, A., Le QuOre, J.-L., Famelart, M.-H., Riaublanc, A. and Rousseau, E (1998). Composition, yield, texture and aroma compounds of goat cheeses as related to the A and O variants of Otsl-casein in milk. Lait 78, 291-301. Pinna, G., Pirisi, A., Piredda, G., Addis, M. and Di Salvo, R. (1999). Effect of milk thermisation on Fiore Sardo DOP cheese. 2. The lipolysis progress during ripening. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 50,366-377. Pirisi, A., Colin, O., Laurent, E, Scher, J. and Parmentier, M. (1994). Comparison of milk composition, cheesemaking properties and textural characteristics of the cheese from two groups of goats with a high or low rate of Otsl-casein synthesis. Int. Dairy J. 4, 329-345. Pirisi, G., Pinna, G. and Papoff, C.M. (1999a). Effect of milk thermisation on Fiore Sardo DOP cheese. 1. Physicochemical characteristics. Sci. Tecn. Latt.-Cas. 50,353-366. Pirisi, A., Piredda, G., Papoff, C.M., Di Salvo, R., Pintus, S., Garro, G., Ferranti, P. and Chianese, L. (1999b). Effects of sheep CCsl-casein CC, CD and DD genotypes on milk composition and cheesemaking properties. J. Dairy Res. 66,409-419. Poullet, B., Huertas, M., S~inchez, A., Caceres, P. and Larriba, G. (1991). Microbial study of Casar de C~iceres cheese throughout ripening. J. Dairy Res. 58, 231-238. Poullet, B., Huertas, M., S~inchez, A., C~iceres, P. and Larriba, G. (1993). Main lactic acid bacteria isolated during ripening of Casar de C~iceres cheese. J. Dairy Res. 60, 123-127. Queiroz-Macedo, I., Faro, C.J. and Pires, E. (1996). Caseinolytic specificity of cardosin, an aspartic protease from the cardoon Cynara cardunculus L.: action on bovine Ors- and [3-casein and comparison with chymosin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 42-47. Ramos, M. and Martinez-Castro, I. (1976). Etude de la proteolyse du fromage type "Manchego" au cours de l'affinage. Lait 56, 164-176. Roman-Blanco, C., Santos-Buelga, J., Moreno-Garcia, B. and Garcia-Lopez, M.L. (1999). Composition and microbiology of Castellano cheese (Spanish hard cheese variety made from ewes' milk). Milchwissenschaft 54, 255-257. Sabio, E. and Vidal Aragon, M.C. (1996). Analysis of the volatile fraction of Ibores cheese. Alimentaria 278, 101-103. Sable, S., Letellier, E and Cottenceau, G. (1997a). An analysis of the volatile flavour compounds in a soft raw goat milk cheese. Biotechnol. Lett. 19, 143-145. Sable, S., Portrait, V., Gautier, V., Letellier, E and Cottenceau, G. (1997b). Microbiological changes in a soft raw goat's milk cheese during ripening. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 21, 212-220. Saldo, J., Sendra, E. and Guamis, B. (2000). High hydrostatic pressure for accelerating ripening of goat's milk cheese: proteolysis and texture. J. Food Sci. 65,636-640.
Saldo, J., McSweeney, P.L.H., Sen&a, E., Kelly, A.L. and Guamis, B. (2002). Proteolysis in caprine milk cheese treated by high pressure to accelerate cheese ripening. Int. Dairy J. 12, 35-44. Salles, C., HervO, C., Septier, C., Demaizieres, D., Lesschaeve, I., Issanchou, S. and Le QuOrO, J.-L. (2000). Evaluation of taste compounds in water-soluble extract of goat cheeses. Food Chem. 68,429-435. Salles, C., Sommerer, N., Septier, C., Issanchou, S., Chabanet, C., Garem, A. and Le Quere, J.-L. (2002). Goat cheese flavor: sensory evaluation of branched-chain fatty acids and small peptides. J. Food Sci. 67,835-841. Santoro, M. and Faccia, M. (1998). Influence of mould size and rennet on proteolysis and composition of Canestrato Pugliese cheese. Ital. J. Food Sci. 10,217-228. Sendra, E., Mor-Mur, M., Pla, R. and Guamis, B. (1999). Evaluation of freezing pressed curd for delayed ripening of semi-hard ovine cheese. Milchwissenschaft 54, 550-553. Sommerer, N., Salles, C., Prome, D., Prome, J.C. and Le Quere, J.L. (2001). Isolation of oligopeptides from the water-soluble extract of goat cheese and their identification by mass-spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49,402-408. Sousa, M.J. and Malcata, EX. (1997). Comparison of plant and animal rennets in terms of microbiological, chemical, and proteolysis characteristics of ovine cheese. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45, 74-81. Sousa, M.J. and Malcata, EX. (1998). Identification of peptides from ovine milk cheese manufactured with animal rennet or extracts of Cynara cardunculus as coagulant. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 4034-4041. Storry, J.E., Grandison, A.S., Millard, D., Owen, A.J. and Ford, G.D. (1983). Chemical composition and coagulation properties of renneted milks from different breeds and species of ruminants. J. Dairy Res. 50, 215-229. Tavaria, EK. and Malcata, EX. (1998). Microbiological characterization of Serra da Estrela cheese throughout its Appellation d'Origine Protegee Region. J. Food Prot. 61,601-607. Tejada, L., Sanchez, E., Gomez, R., Vioque, M. and Fern~indezSalguero, J. (2002). Effect of freezing and frozen storage on chemical and microbiological characteristics in sheep milk cheese.J. Food Sci. 67, 126-129. The Greek Cheese page (1994). http://www.greece.org/hellas/cheese.html. Tornadijo, E., Fresno, J.M., Carballo, J. and Martfn-Sarmiento, R. (1993). Study of Enterobacteriaceae throughout the manufacturing and ripening of hard goats' cheese. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75,240-246. Trujillo, A.J., Royo, C., Ferragut, V. and Guamis, B. (1999). Ripening profiles of goat cheese produced from milk treated with high pressure. J. Food Sci. 64,833-837. Tzanetakis, N., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. and Manolkidis, K. (1987). Microbiology of Kopanisti, a traditional Greek cheese. Food Microbiol. 4, 251-256. Tzanetakis, N., Vafopoulou-Mastrojiannaki, A. and LitopoulouTzanetaki, E. (1995). The quality of white-brined cheese made with different starters. Food Microbiol. 12, 55-63. Vassal, L., Delacroix-Buchet, A. and Bouillon, J. (1994). Influence des variants AA, EE et FF de la caseine Otslcaprine sur le rendement fromager et les characteristiques
Cheeses Made from Ewes' and Goats' Milk
sensorielles de fromages traditionnels: premieres observations. Lait 74, 89-103. Ver~ssimo, P., Esteves, C., Faro, C. and Pires, E. (1995). The vegetable rennet of Cynara cardunculus L. contains two proteinases with chymosin and pepsin-like specifities. Biotechnol. Lett. 17, 621-626. Verissimo, P., Faro, C., Moir, A.J.M., Lin, Y., Tang, J. and Pires, E. (1996). Purification, characterization and partial amino acid sequencing of two new aspartic proteinases from fresh flowers of Cynara cardunculus L. Eur. J. Biochem. 235, 762-768. Vicente, M.S., Ib~il~ez, E C., Barcina, Y. and Barr6n, L.J.R. (2001). Changes in the free amino acid content during ripening of Idiaz~ibal cheese: influence of starter and rennet type. Food Chem. 72,309-317. Vieira de Sa, E and Barbosa, M. (1972) Cheesemaking with a vegetable rennet from cardo (Cynara cardunculus L.). J. Dairy Res. 39,335-343. Vioque, M., Gomez, R., S~inchez, E., Mata, C., Tejada, L. and Fern~indez-Salguero, J. (2000). Chemical and microbio-
299
logical characteristics of ewes' milk cheese manufactured with extracts from flowers of Cynara cardunculus and Cynara humilis as coagulants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 451-456. Voutsinas, L.P., Katsiari, M.C., Pappas, C.P. and Mallatou, H. (1995). Production of brined soft cheese from frozen ultrafiltered sheep's milk. Part 2: Compositional, physicochemical, microbiological and organoleptic properties of cheese. Food Chem. 52, 235-247. Xanthopoulos, V., Polychroniadou, A., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. and Tzanetakis, N. (2000). Characteristics of Anevato cheese made from raw or heat-treated goat milk inoculated with a lactic starter. Lebens.-Wiss. Technol. 33, 483-488. Z~irate, V., Belda, E, PCrez, C. and Cardell, E. (1997). Changes in the microbial flora of Tenerife goats' milk cheese during ripening. Int. Dairy J. 7, 635-641. Zerfiridis, G.K. (1999). G r e e c e - a country of diverse milk production but short in dairy products. Milchwissenschaft 54, 424-426.
Acid- and Acid/Rennet-curd Cheeses Part A: Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties D. Schulz-Collins, Arrabawn Co-op, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary, Ireland B. Senge, Technische Universit&t Berlin, Faculty of Process Sciences, Department of Food Rheology, Berlin, Germany
Fresh cheeses are unripened cheeses, which are manufactured by the coagulation of milk, cream or whey using acid, a combination of acid and rennet or a combination of acid and heat. Fresh cheeses are ready for consumption immediately after production. In most countries and cultures, there is some traditional form of flesh cheese. With increased globalisation and tourism, the various regional types of fresh cheese have begun to spread outside their regions of origin. Cream cheese, Cottage cheese, Quark or Tvorog, Fromage frais and Ricotta are among the better-known types. Quark (in German-speaking countries) or Tvorog (in Eastern European countries) is essentially a milk protein paste. It is milky white to faintly yellowish in colour; smooth, homogeneously soft, mildly supple and elastic in body; mildly acidic and clean in flavour. Due to the high moisture content (--~82%, w/w), the shelf-life is limited to 2-4 weeks at < 8 ~ There should be no appearance of whey, dryness or graininess, bacteriological deterioration, over-acidification or bitter flavour during storage (Kroger, 1980; Siggelkow, 1984; Guinee et al., 1993). Hot-pack Cream cheese ('Soft Cheese' in the UK; 'Fresh Cheese' in Germany) is a creamy-white, slightly acid-tasting product with a mild diacetyl flavour; its consistency ranges from brittle, especially for double Cream cheese (DCC), to spreadable for single Cream cheese (SCC). Cream cheese, which is very popular in North America, has a shelf-life of "-3 months < 8 ~ (Guinee et al., 1993). Hard and brittle structures can be obtained only in high-fat Cream cheese (55-60%, w/w, fat-in-dry matter (FDM); Walenta et al., 1988). Quark and Cream cheeses can be consumed plain or in sweet or savoury dishes. Most fresh cheeses are very versatile and particularly suitable for processing into fresh cheese preparations or various dishes (e.g., cheesecakes, sauces, desserts).
Fresh cheeses can be divided into various categories, e.g., by the method of coagulation- acid, acidrennet, acid-heat, etc., their consistency- paste, grainy or gel-like, or raw m a t e r i a l - milk or whey (Fig. 1). In comparison to most ripened cheeses, fresh cheeses are generally low in dry matter (DM) and, hence, low in fat and protein and high in lactose/lactate (Table 1). As most of the calcium is solubilised during the acid coagulation and removed with the whey, fresh cheeses are much lower in calcium than rennet-curd cheeses. Classification and definition of cheeses are, in most countries, controlled by a codex or law, as done in Germany (Table 2) with the Kaseverordnung (Cheese order; Anon, 1986). German Quark is defined as containing at least 18%, w/w, DM, at least 12%, w/w, protein and a maximum 18.5%, w/w, whey protein in the total nitrogen content; products with a DM < 18%, w/w, are to be labelled as Frischktise (Fresh Cheese; Anon, 1986). In other countries, definitions can be less stringent or nonexistent. Often, only total moisture and protein contents are specified, as for, e.g., Kwark or Verse kaas (Quark or Fresh cheese) in The Netherlands, i.e., moisture maximum 87%, w/w, and protein minimum 60%, w/w, of non-fat DM (Anon, 1994b). American Cream cheese (>33%, w/w, fat, 45%, w/w, DM), Neufchatel (20-33%, w/w, fat, 35%, w/w, DM) and German Double Cream (fresh) cheese (26.4-38.3%, w/w, fat, 44%, w/w, DM) are similar in composition and comparable to Petit Suisse or Fromage frais/t la cr~me cheeses of France (Anon, 1986; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997). World cheese production experienced a low of --~14 million tonnes in 1992/1993 due to the crisis in the former USSR. In 1995-1996 an upward trend started again and world production increased to 15.4 million tonnes in 1999. When cheese production was analysed for 26 countries that accounted for ---80% of the world production in 2001 (Table 3), the most distinct tendency is the remarkable upward trend for fresh cheese, which increased by 38% (from 2 660 000 tonnes in
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 2: Major Cheese Groups ISBN: 0-1226-3653-8 Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
302
Quark,
Cream
Cheese
and
Related
Varieties
and a c i d - c u r d
Acid/rennet-
cheese
varieties
I
I Fresh c h e e s e s
I I
Standard varieties
[
I
-- Paste-like consistency --Quark and quark-related
-
[
Mainly acid coagulated varieties
Baker's cheese - Topfen -Tvorog, Tvarog, Twarogow - Fromage Frais -- Labneh, Labaneh - Buttermilkquark - Petit Suisse - Neufchatel --Ymer -- Chakka, Shirkhand -- Skyr - - Queso Blanco - Cream cheese -Double Cream cheese -
Other varieties
Ripened
acid-curd
cheeses
Harzer Mainzer Olmuetzer Quargel Topfkaese
~ Cottage cheese Acid-heat coagulated t Ricotta, Ricottone Mascarpone Queso Blanco, Queso Fresco
Gel-like consistency
L Layered white cheese (Schichtkaese) Fresh cheese varieties.
1990 to 3 662 000 tonnes in 1999). In i999, 32% of the total cheese production was fresh cheese, compared to 30% 10 years ago (Sorensen, 2001). One reason for the steady increase in output of fresh cheese is that the ingredient sector is becoming more and more important. Major producers are the US (with a large ingredient sector) and the E U - in which Germany, France and Italy produce the highest levels, although Spain and Denmark have also experienced a large increase. Neither The Netherlands nor New Zealand and Australia have a fresh cheese output of importance on the world market (Anon, 1994a; Sorensen, 2001). Of the total production of fresh cheeses in the EU, approximately 47% is produced in Germany, 35% in France and 13% in Italy. In Germany and France, fresh cheese constitutes 47% and 33% of total cheese production, respectively. In Europe, the per capita consumption of fresh cheese is highest in Germany (8.7 kg/year in 1999), followed by France, Poland and Iceland. Almost half of the fresh cheese consumed in Germany is Quark (4.0 kg/year); the balance is Cream, Cottage and other fresh cheeses. Especially high growth rates have been observed for fresh cheese preparations con-
taining fruit or herbs (Richarts, 2001). Fresh cheese consumption is also very high in the Middle-East (e.g., in Israel, 12.3 kg/year in 1998). In Eastern European markets, particularly in Russia and Poland, Tvorog-type cheeses represent up to two-thirds of total cheese consumption (Rouyer, 1997). Poland and Russia are amongst the biggest Tvorog producers in Europe. Mann (1978a,b, 1982, 1984, 1987, 1994, 1997, 2000) has been following and reviewing the world literature on the manufacture, composition and utilisation of Quark and related products for almost the last three decades. The production of fresh acid- or acid/rennet-curd cheeses typically involves the addition of a starter culture and a relatively small amount of rennet to skim milk. Under these conditions, the milk undergoes slow quiescent acidification resulting in the formation of a gel at a pH value near the isoelectric pH of casein (typically 4.8-4.6). The gel is then stirred and concentrated by one of the several techniques, such as centrifugation or ultrafiltration (UF), which involve removal of whey or permeate. The resulting product might be cooled and packaged directly (e.g., Speisequark) or further processed (e.g., heat-treated Quark desserts, Fig. 2).
Quark, Cream C h e e s e and Related Varieties
303
Approximate composition (%, w/w) of various fresh cheeses
Variety (German) Skim Quark (German) Single Cream cheese (German) Double Cream cheese American Cream cheese Neufchatel Labneh Skyr Ymer Lactofil Buttermilk Quark Whole milk Ricotta Part skim milk Ricotta Mascarpone Cottage cheese Baker's cheese Cebreiro cheese
Dry matter
Fat
Protein
Lactose and lactate
pH
> 18
12
3-4
4.6
39
19.5
n.a.
3.5
4.6
44
26.4-38.3
n.a.
2-3
4.6
>45 >35 22-26 18.5-20.5 14.5 16 15 28-41
>33 20-33 7-10 0.2-0.4 3.5 5 0.75-0.95 13-17
n.a. n.a. 7-10 12.5-16.0 5-6 5-6 9-10 11.3-1 8
2-3 2-3 --~4.2 3.6-3.8 n.a. n.a. 3.5-3.6 3.0
4.6 4.6 4.0-4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5-4.7 5.7-5.8
25
8
12
3.6
5.8
45-55 21 26 30-35
45-55 4.5 0.2 15-17
7-8 12.5 19 --~12
n.a. 2.6 3-4 n.a.
5.8 n.a. 4.6 4.55
Compiled from Anon, 1986; Tamime and Robinson, 1988; Jelen and Renz-Schauen, 1989; Modler and Emmons, 1989; Lehmann et aL, 1991; Guinee et aL, 1993; Kessler, 1996; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997; Ozer et aL, 1999; Boone, 2001a,b; Fernandez-Albalat et aL, 2001.
Compositional specification of fresh cheeses according to German regulations
Fat category (Fettstufe)
German Quark Dry matter (%) Protein (%) Fat in dry matter (%) Fat, absolute (%)
Skim
Quarterfat a
Halffat
Threequarter fat
Fat
Fullfat
Cream
Double Cream
>18.0 b >12.0 c ' 1.0 c,
5.97
(1)
E
a_ 0.5
pH 6.33
0
~
p
I 0
1
H
I
6.68
I
2 3 Time (h)
Permeability of rennet-induced skim milk gels as a function of time after renneting at 30 ~ and various pH values (redrawn from Walstra, 1993).
German-type Quark and East European Tvorog are usually produced using small amounts of rennet in order to improve the draining characteristics of the curd, to reduce casein fines and increase curd firmness (Jelen and Renz-Schauen, 1989). Rennet is also known to produce bitter peptides by its proteolytic activity; therefore, a high rennet concentration can lead to bitterness in Quark (B~iurle et al., 1984; Sohal et al., 1988; Shah et al., 1990). The typical rennet concentration used in commercial Quark manufacture, depending on rennet type and strength, is 2-20 ml of standard strength rennet per 1000 1 of milk (Table 4). The rennet action enhances the destabilisation and aggregation of the casein micelles during acidification, i.e., the ratio between aggregation and disaggregation
'TO O c
~ oO4
O~
o
~-
~
"~ ~
"1-
9
o o o4 v
cO cO
0 0
v O v
co
~9
~
~:N
-,
2o
q
o
o
9
9
z~
z~
9
9
9
O
O
N
9
~
tO
,
NN
NN
N
O0 O4 I U'~ O O4 CO
O CO
cO
O O
o 0
h
LO O
O
0
~
o
~
cN
O0
0
9
(D v
O r
~O,I
O
--~
~d
O
cO (.O
o~
~d,~~5
O .c
o c ~_ O (D "~
or~
O o
CO I
OO
~5
O3 ~
~t
~d
"10 O
c
c
O
E
O .,.., o
o~
~ 0
~
c
O
-~-
-~- ~ ~-
O
O
E o >,r-
__
E
tO J
o._1
E
O
x o O
c
o o4
E
o o o
9
A
c
c
~-
o~
~'~
0
--
03
.~q.~
O~
~
.,-, 9 c
0 CO
O
O
r~ O
O
o4
u')
c
I.O r
.,,--, O tc
o
r
c~ , ~ -
0')
'-
O~ ~ "
O O
"O O O LL
-r"
.~ 9 c
O c O'd '-- " ]
c c
O
c ~D
n
d
C cO
.,--,
c
"iO C
"--
"
~
~
~
"~
_I
tO
~ N - ~ OLIJ
oN ~_
C
g o g o e~o
~_, ~ _ ~
0
~"
~
O V ~ . _ ~ c
121
(D
c
o
o~
~.-
.
.
.
~mN g N o
-
on
m
(/37-
13_
O C O O
-o r
r a~ L._
~D
C C (D
O r Ck
C
n~ ql O
~
O ~
O O O
g
O
o
o
LO
O
7
?
O4 "
~,
~ CO
t~
"O4 -
I
O
o c O o
7" -~
O C
m
C
309
310
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
forces during the early stages of acidification is increased (Guinee et al., 1993). If Quark is produced using acidification only, the coagulum is cut at pH 4.7-4.5 whereas the acid-rennet gel can be cut at a higher pH (4.8-4.9). The shift of the maximum storage modulus of a pure acid-induced gel from pH 4.5 to 4.7-4.8 for an acid-rennet gel is explained by the higher isoelectric point of the para-K-casein in comparison to the K-casein (Roefs et al., 1990). Therefore, over-acidification can be prevented by rennet addition. If the heat treatment is severe (i.e., 95 ~ for 5 min), there are no perceptible differences in UF Quark made with or without rennet (Sachdeva et al., 1993) as the casein is less susceptible to rennet hydrolysis when complexed with denatured whey protein. Ultrafiltration- or Thermoquarks are usually heated in the region 88-95 ~ for 3-6 min. If rennet is used in the process to obtain a firmer product, a lower heat treatment is used, i.e., 88 ~ for 3 min. Much firmer gels are produced when a small amount of rennet is added at the beginning of acidification as the enzymatic reaction is accelerated by lowering the pH (Fig. 7; Lehmann et al., 1991; Schkoda, 1998; Herbert et al., 1999; Schulz et al., 1999; Lucey et al., 2000; Schulz, 2000; Tranchant et al., 2001). The addition of rennet at the beginning of acidification induces a coarser network (Bishop et al., 1983; Roefs et al., 1990; Schkoda, 1998; Lucey et al., 2000; Schkoda et al., 2001a). Particle strands of stirred acid-rennet gels are thicker than in stirred acid gels, i.e., casein micelles partially fuse together (Roefs, 1986; Roefs et al., 1990; Schkoda, 1998). Casein particles in acidset curd are smaller than from enzyme-acid-set curd throughout various stages of Cottage cheese produc-
tion, i.e., after cutting, cooking and draining (Bishop et al., 1983). Rennet gels at pH 6.7 (tan 6 = 0.60) are more viscous-like than acid gels at pH 4.6 (tan ~ = 0.27) or acid-rennet gels at pH 4.6 (tan 6 = 0.26). As tan 6 is related to the relaxation of bonds in the gel during its deformation, rennet-induced gels are more prone to syneresis (Roefs, 1986; Roefs et al., 1990; Walstra, 1993). Therefore, syneresis of combined gels increases strongly with increasing rennet concentration (Roefs, 1986; Walstra, 1993; Schkoda, 1998; Schkoda et al., 2001a). However, Lucey et al. (2001) found more syneresis in low-rennet-GDL gels (10 ml of a double strength calf rennet/1000 1 of milk) than in high-rennet-GDL gels (150 ml/1000 1) for heated and unheated milks. Various parameters of rennet gels, acid gels and acid-rennet gels are compared in Table 5. In addition to the milk coagulation initiated by acidification alone, two other distinct types of coagulation profiles (Fig. 7) were identified, depending on the relative contribution of acidification versus renneting to initial gel formation (Dalgleish and Home, 1991; Schulz et al., 1999; Schulz, 2000; Tranchant, 2000; Kelly and O'Kennedy, 2001; Tranchant et al., 2001). Up to a certain, i.e., 'critical', rennet concentration, gel formation and firming due to acidification and renneting occur simultaneously, i.e., truly combined acidification and renneting (Schulz, 2000; Tranchant et al., 2001). This 'critical' rennet concentration was found to be 1.7-2.2 ml rennet per 1000 1 of milk (see Table 4 for rennet strength) at 30-40 ~ and a renneting pH of 6.4-6.6 (Dalgleish and Horne, 1991; Schulz et al., 1999; Tranchant et al., 2001). The highest gel firming rate and final complex viscosity of acid-rennet gels were found at this critical rennet concentration (Schulz etal.,
c
200
6.5
180 160 EL
6.0
E 140 v
120 g
~00
~"
80
~. 8
"r
5.5
6o
b
40 20 0 200
a 400
600
800
1000
5.0 4.5 1200
Time (min) Time-related change in complex viscosity (m) and pH ( ) of skim milk treated with a mesophilic starter culture and rennet (Fromase 220TL, DSM Food Specialties B.V., Dortmund) at different levels (ml rennet/1000 I milk: a, 0; b, 0.5; c, 2; d, 9; e, 20) during slow and quiescent acidification at 31 ~ (redrawn from Schulz, 2000).
Quark,
Properties of skim milk gels obtained by renneting (aged for about 1 h), by acidification (aged for 6-16 h) or by combined renneting and acidification. All gels were formed by slow quiescent acidification using GDL at 30 ~
pH Elastic modulus, G' at = 0.01 rad s -1 (Pa) Loss tangent, tan 8 at ~o = 0.01 rad s -1 Fracture stress (Pa) Fracture strain ( - ) Permeability B (l~m2)
Rennet gel
Acid gel
Combined gel
6.65 32
4.6 20
4.6 800
0.55
0.27
0.27
10 3.0 0.25
100 1.1-1.5 0.15
300 0.7 0.28
Data from Roefs et aL, 1990; Walstra, 1993; Lucey et al., 2000.
1999). Rennet concentrations higher than the 'critical' value lead to a distinct local maximum in gel consistency followed by a local minimum, i.e., sequential formation of rennet gel and acidification (Schulz, 2000; Tranchant et al., 2001). Rennet addition shortens the clotting time, and gelation occurs at a higher pH (Noel, 1989; Noel et al., 1991; Schkoda, 1998; Lucey et al., 2000; Schulz, 2000). There is a linear relationship between the inverse of rennet concentration and the clotting time as well as the time to reach the local viscosity maximum for the combined acidification-renneting method (Schulz, 2000). On increasing the rennet concentration in the range 0-20 ml/1000 1, the pH at aggregation and the local maximum of the complex viscosity increased
Cream
Cheese
and Related Varieties
311
from pH 5.44 to 6.31 and 5.05 to 5.38, respectively (Fig. 8; Schulz et al., 1999; Schulz, 2000; Fromase 220TL, DSM Food Specialties B.V., Dortmund). However, the local viscosity minimum and final viscosity maximum occured at the same pH, i.e., pH 4.95 and 4.45, respectively, when rennet was added at pH 6.45 and 30 ~ The complex viscosity of the local maximum is constant, i.e., does not change with rennet concentration. After the local maximum, the complex viscosity at all points, e.g., inflection points, local minimum and absolute (final) maximum in the viscosity curve (Fig. 4), decreases at rennet concentrations above the critical rennet concentration (Schulz, 2000). Noel et al. (1991) observed an initial increase of the storage modulus at the local maximum and then a slight decrease. Not only are acid-rennet gels firmer, but also the apparent viscosity of stirred products like Quark is higher than in those made by acidification alone. Syneresis of Quark produced by acid-rennet coagulation is also higher than in purely acid-fermented Quarks (Shah et al., 1990; Schkoda et al., 2001a). Heat treatment
Heat treatment of milk has very different effects on acid, rennet and acid-rennet coagulation and gels. Heat treatment of milk at > 70 ~ causes denaturation of the whey proteins, ot-lactalbumin and [3-1actoglobulin, some of which may complex with micellar K-casein by hydrophobic and disulphide intermolecular interactions (Smits and van Brouwershaven, 1980; Law et al., 1994; Lucey 1995; Singh, 1995). The yield of Quark can be increased by heat denaturation of the whey proteins (Puhan and Pltieler, 1974; RA
6.5 6.3
Enzymatic hydrolysis
.---------
6.1
A
5.9 5.7
Initial aggregation
IP1
-r{3. 5.5 5.3 5.1 4.9
Max1 /
~
4.7 4.5
I 2
Microsyneresis
Acid gel formation I I I 4 6 8 Rennet concentration (ml/1000 I)
IP3
I 10
Phases during combined acid-rennet coagulation of skim milk as a function of rennet concentration. The skim milk was heat-treated at 72 ~ for 30 s; gelation at 31 ~ was initiated by a mesophilic starter culture and rennet (Fromase 220TL, DSM Food Specialties B.V., Dortmund) at pH 6.45. The pH was measured at various points obtained from the complex viscosity/time curve (as in Fig. 4). RA, rennet addition; A, aggregation (initial increase of complex viscosity); IP1 and IP3, inflection points 1 and 3; Max1, local maximum (redrawn from Schulz, 2000).
312
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Sheth et al., 1988; Shah et al., 1990; Kelly and O'Donnell, 1998; Mara and Kelly, 1998) as exploited in the Thermoprocess. However, in the Thermoprocess, a higher level of rennet and a secondary heating prior to whey separation are necessary to enhance whey expulsion to give the desired DM content. The resulting Quark is softer and creamier than the traditional separator-type Quark (Dolle, 1977, 1981; Ott, 1977). In particular, when rennet is used in Quark production, the heat treatment must be lower than in yoghurt production. The degree of hydration and apparent viscosity of stirred acid-rennet gels (7%, w/w, protein) increase markedly up to a degree of whey protein denaturation of 30% when heated to 80 ~ with only a slight further increase at higher levels of whey protein denaturation (Schkoda, 1998). The optimum degree of whey protein denaturation for fresh cheese is 75-80%. If it is too low, the consistency of the product will be too soft, and not creamy; however, over-denaturation, i.e., at a temperature >120 ~ leads to protein aggregation which causes sandiness in the fresh cheese (B~urle et al., 1984; Schkoda and Kessler, 1997a,b). Depending on the manufacturing method used, the heat treatment is usually in the range 88-95 ~ for 3-6 min for Thermo- or UF Quarks (e.g., B/iurle et al., 1984; ROckseisen, 1987; Sachdeva et al., 1993; Rogenhofer et al., 1994). Several authors have observed spontaneous syneresis in combined gels made from unheated milk (Schulz, 2000; Lucey et al., 2001; Tranchant et al., 2001). Confocal scanning laser micrographs of acid-rennet gels made from unheated milk showed much larger pores than acid-rennet gels made from heated milk. This was
6.5
confirmed by permeability measurements (Lucey et al., 2001). Acid-rennet gels made from unheated milk are extremely prone to spontaneous whey separation, possibly due to considerable rearrangements of aggregated particles at an early stage of the gelation process (Schulz, 2000; Lucey et al., 2001). In pure acid coagulation, gelation occurs more rapidly and at a higher pH with increasing heat treatment (Heertje et al., 1985; Banon and Hardy, 1992). During combined acidification and renneting of low-heated milk (74 ~ for 30 s) or high-heated milk (86 ~ for 6 min), the pH at which aggregation begins remained constant at 6.3 but the pH for the local maximum (Maxl in Fig. 4) decreased from 5.6 to 5.0 (Fig. 9; Schulz, 2000). The initial increase in complex viscosity of acid-rennet gels is reduced by the heat treatment of milk (Lucey et al., 2000; Schulz, 2000). As this stage relates to the secondary phase of rennet coagulation (Schulz, 2000), this confirms the findings that this phase is more adversely affected by heat treatment than the enzymatic phase of rennet coagulation. Acid-rennet gels made from heated milk are firmer than those from unheated milks because the casein is crosslinked by denatured whey proteins and the local maximum/minimum are less pronounced due to reduced (micro-) syneresis (Lucey et al., 2000; Schulz, 2000). The maximum tan is smaller in gels from heated milks compared to unheated milks (---0.43 and 0.51, respectively), indicating that the proteins undergo fewer large-scale rearrangements (Lucey et al., 2000). Confocal micrographs indicate that the pores are much smaller and
RA A
Enzymatic hydrolysis
6.3 6.1
Initial aggregation
5.9 5.7 "T" T 5.5
IP1
~Maxl
Q.
5.3 5.1
Micro~ s y n e r e s i s ~
Rennet gel formation IP3
4.9 Acid gel formation
4.7 4.5
1:0
1 "1 Ratio Low-heatedhigh-heated skim milk
0:1
Phases during combined acid-rennet coagulation of skim milk as a function of the ratio of low-heat-treated skim milk (74 ~ for 30 s) and high-heat-treated skim milk (86 ~ for 6 min) in the milk blend used for gelation; gelation was initiated at 31 ~ by a mesophilic starter culture and 9 ml/1000 I rennet (Fromase 220TL, DSM Food Specialties B.V., Dortmund) at pH 6.45. The pH was measured at various points obtained from the complex viscosity/time curve (as in Fig. 4). RA, rennet addition; A, aggregation (initial increase of complex viscosity); IP1 and IP3, inflection points 1 and 3; Max1, local maximum (redrawn from Schulz, 2000).
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
there appears to be more interconnectivity of the network in acid-rennet gels made from heated milk than those from unheated milk (Lucey et al., 2000).
313
The clotting time is also reduced at lower pH values during combined acidification and renneting (van Hooydonk et al., 1986a; Noel et al., 1991; Schulz et al., 1999; Schulz, 2000). There are discrepancies over the following stages of the coagulation process. Nod et al. (1991) investigated the effect of renneting pH in the range 5.98-6.62 up to the local minimum. At low rennet concentrations, the clotting time decreases markedly with decreasing pH whereas at high rennet concentrations the clotting time is independent of the renneting pH. The complex viscosity of acid-rennet gels at the local maximum (Maxl in Fig. 4) increases with decreasing pH for all rennet levels. Schulz et al. (1999) and Schulz (2000) found no difference in the final viscosity for renneting pH between 6.6 and 5.8. However, the initial aggregation reactions, i.e., due mainly to rennet, are affected by the renneting pH. If the rennet is added at a pH below 6.0, the typical local maximum and minimum are less pronounced as the two processes of acidification and renneting occur simultaneously. The pH values for clotting (pH 6.40-5.63), inflection point 1 (pH 5.65-5.17) and local maximum (pH 5.16-5.02) are directly related to the renneting pH (pH 6.6-5.8) whereas the pH values for the local minimum (pH 5.0), inflection point 3 (pH 4.80--4.85) and the final maximum (pH 4.45--4.50) are influenced solely by the acidification and not by the pH at renneting (Fig. 10). At pH values >5.9, the pH at which the rennet is added does not affect the magnitude of the complex viscosity ~/* of acid-rennet gels at the local maximum, local minimum and final maximum (Schulz, 2000). No information is
pH at renneting In Quark manufacture, rennet is rarely added simultaneously with the culture, but after 60-90 min when the pH is around 6.3. The correct moment of rennet addition and the effect on structural properties is based mainly on empirical experience. The pH value at which rennet is added (Table 4) varies from the natural pH to 6.00, and is mainly around 6.30-6.45. During rennet coagulation alone, the clotting time is markedly reduced at lower pH values as the pH is very important for the enzymatic activity of the rennet, with an optimum at pH 6.0 (Mehaia and Cheryan, 1983; van Hooydonk et al., 1986a; Zoon et al., 1989; Fox and Mulvihill, 1990; Dalgleish, 1992). With decreasing pH, the aggregation of micelles starts at a lower conversion of K-casein to para-K-casein (70% at pH 6.7 compared to 30% at pH 5.6) and the rate of aggregation and gel formation increases (van Hooydonk et al., 1986a). This is due mainly to the higher calcium ion activity at low pH values; the rate of aggregation is doubled by reducing the pH from 6.8 to 6.3 (Dalgleish, 1992). A lower pH possibly also leads to a faster rearrangement of strands and fusion of micelles, resulting in a faster increase in the storage modulus (G') directly after the onset of gelation and the earlier attainment of a plateau value of the storage modulus (Zoon et al., 1989).
RA 6.5
A
6.0 Initial aggregation -r
IP1
5.5
O.
~ 5,0
~
Rennet gel formation ~
Max1 Microsyneresis
-
IP3
Acid gel formation 4.5
5.8
, 6.0
I
I
I
6.2
6.4
6.6
pH at rennet addition Phases during combined acid-rennet coagulation of skim milk as a function of pH at rennet addition. The skim milk was heat-treated at 72 ~ for 30 s; gelation was initiated by a mesophilic starter culture and 9 ml/1000 I rennet (Fromase 220TL, DSM Food Specialties B.V., Dortmund) at 31 ~ The pH was measured at various points obtained from the complex viscosity/time curve (as in Fig. 4). RA, rennet addition; A, aggregation (initial increase of complex viscosity); IP1 and IP3, inflection points 1 and 3; Max1, local maximum (redrawn from Schulz, 2000).
314
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
available on how the renneting pH affects the rheological and syneretic properties of the final product. Rate of gelation Culture addition and acidification profile are normally such that the milk has reached pH 6.3 after 1.5 h (pH for rennet addition) and pH 4.5-4.6 after about 16 h (German-type Quark). American-style Cream cheese or Quark is fermented in a shorter period of time, i.e., 5-6 h (Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997) or 8-9 h (Sohal et al., 1988). High rates of acid gelation lead to coarser networks with a greater tendency to syneresis. The rate of gelation increases with increasing rate of acidification, increasing temperature and increasing casein concentration (Heertje et al., 1985; Hammelehle, 1994). Incubation temperature For Quark-type products, either the cold method (22-24 ~ or warm method (28-31 ~ can be used. The amount of starter added is normally adjusted so that Quark can be separated the following morning, i.e., 16 h coagulation with an optional rennet addition after 60-90 min. The higher the temperature for acid gelation, the higher is the pH at which clotting and gelation begins during acidification (Heertje et al., 1985; Kim and Kinsella, 1989; Banon and Hardy, 1992). Increasing temperature also causes an increase in the maximum rate of coagulation due to an increase in the frequency of thermal collision between casein micelles (Kim and Kinsella, 1989). The coagulation rate of casein has a Q10 of 2-5 under various conditions (Walstra and Jennes, 1984). In acid gels, higher gelation temperatures result in a greater permeability coefficient, indicating the presence of larger pores and, therefore, increased susceptibility to syneresis (Lucey et al., 1997). Microscopic investigations show a coarser network at higher temperatures (Heertje et al., 1985; Rods, 1986). These effects at increased incubation temperatures may be attributed to a higher ratio of aggregation to dissaggregation forces during the early stages of acidification owing to decreased casein dissociation from the micelles, a reduction in repulsive forces due to increased hydrophobicity and a faster rate of acidification which is subject to the type of bacterial culture (Guinee et al., 1993). There is no information available on the effect of incubation temperature on the acid-rennet coagulation. Level and type of gel-forming protein Fermented milk gels and rennet curds are particle gels, networks built up of casein micelles or marginally modified micelles (Roefs, 1986; Home, 1998). The level and nature of proteins in the fresh cheese milk mainly determine the structure of the product. The manufacture of fresh cheeses involves a step to increase protein concentration (e.g., 12%, w/w, protein for Quark). Quark pro-
duced using the standard separator method incorporates a maximum of 15%, w/w, whey proteins; this type of Quark is generally described as firm, dry and sour. Thermoquark or UF Quark may contain all the whey proteins present in milk and is creamier, smoother, softer and often milder (Lehmann etal., 1991; Ottosen, 1996; Schkoda and Kessler, 1996; Hinrichs, 2001). The level of whey proteins in Quark is also regulated by law in Germany (> 12%, w/w, protein of which a maximum of 18.5%, w/w, is whey protein; Anon, 1986). For a gel with a given protein concentration, the final gel strength at 30 ~ and pH 4.6 increases up to a ratio of 1.5/10.5 whey protein/casein and decreases at a ratio 2.0/10 (Kelly and O'Kennedy, 2001). The proportion of pre-denatured whey protein required to give the desired synergism is substantially lower in the fresh cheese model compared to 2.5/10 in the model yoghurt system studied by O'Kennedy and Kelly (2000). The firmness of fresh cheeses increases with increasing total protein content (Korolczuk and Mahaut, 1991a; Mahaut and Korolczuk, 1992; Ozer et al., 1999). For a given protein type and degree of gel fineness, high levels of gel-forming protein result in a denser (i.e., greater number of strands of equal thickness per unit volume), more highly branched network which has a greater degree of overlapping of strands and a narrower pore size (Harwalker and Kalab, 1980; Modler and Kalab, 1983; Modler et al., 1983; Ozer et al., 1999). Increasing the protein concentration in skim milk by nanofihration from 3.5 to 7.0%, w/w, increases gel firmness, apparent viscosity, serum-holding capacity, solvation and fineness of the gel network; the rate of increase of the apparent viscosity over the protein range is slightly higher for acid-rennet gels than for acid gels (Schkoda, 1998; Schkoda et al., 2001a). Undenatured whey proteins do not participate in texture formation in acid-type fresh cheese (Korolczuk and Mahaut, 1991a,b; Mahaut and Korolczuk, 1992). For milk heated at 72 ~ for 15 s, increasing the whey protein content (from 19.6 to 25.6%, 32.9% and 41.4%, w/w, of total protein), by the addition of spraydried UF protein concentrate, reduced cheese viscosity substantially. However, as the heat treatment of the milk was increased to 92 ~ for 15 s or 92 ~ for 60 s, starting at a higher initial viscosity (i.e. at 19.6%, w/w, whey protein of total protein) increasing the whey protein content caused smaller decreases in cheese viscosity (Mahaut and Korolczuk, 1992). Factors which lead to an increase in the effective protein concentration include: (i) fortification with proteins, as often practised in the production of Fromage frais or Cream cheese by the addition of protein powders to either the milk or Cream cheese after separation;
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
(ii) high heat treatment which causes the co-precipitation of denatured whey proteins onto the casein micelles and which therefore participate in gel formation; (iii) combining high-temperature heating and membrane technology to retain the denatured and aggregated whey proteins; (iv) homogenising of the fat-containing milk, as practised in Cream cheese production, which results in the incorporation of proteins in the fat globule membrane. Calcium chloride
Progressive solubilisation of salts bound to the casein leads to almost complete demineralisation at pH 5.00 (Heertje etal., 1985; van Hooydonk et al., 1986b; Dalgleish and Law, 1989). This suggests that the addition of CaCI2 to milk during flesh cheese production is not justified. If milk has been subjected to a high heat treatment, 500-800 ml of a liquid CaC12 solution (33%, ww) per 1000 1 milk can be added to improve its rennet coagulation properties (Spreer, 1998). The effect of CaC12 on the process of combined acidification and renneting is difficult to establish as it decreases the pH and, therefore, accelerates the rennet action (Walstra, 1993; Schkoda, 1998; Schulz, 2000). The viscosity of stirred acid-rennet gels is higher when CaCI2 is added (Schkoda, 1998). Schulz (2000) did not observe an effect of CaC12 on acid-rennet coagulation when the rennet was added at pH 6.45. Gastaldi et al. (1994) established the effect of calcium on combined acidification and renneting in the range of 10-30 ml rennet/1000 1 (for rennet specification see Table 4). No difference was found between calcium-free and calcium-enriched milk (6.25 mM) at 10 ml rennet/1000 1. At a rennet concentration >20 ml rennet/1000 1, the clotting time and pH were reduced by calcium, i.e., calcium affects the acid-rennet gelation only when >10 ml rennet/1000 1 are added and the gelation becomes more like rennet coagulation. Noel (1989) also found that the clotting time remained constant for various calcium concentrations (0-400 mg/hg). The storage modulus of the local maximum decreased with increasing calcium concentration (40-400 mg/hg), whereas storage modulus of the local minimum increased slightly (0-160 mg/~g) and then decreased (Noel, 1989).
The majority of acid- and acid/rennet-curd flesh cheeses are produced by acid (and rennet) coagulation, separation of the curd from the whey, various heating and homogenising steps. Fresh cheese preparations are blended with different ingredients (Fig. 2).
315
Q u a r k - traditional batch methods
Batch separation of curd from whey was done originally by draining and pressing the curd in filter bags. This process produces a granular textured Quark with a smooth mouthfeel and is still used for Farmhouse cheeses or Quarks with very high DM, up to 27-33%, w/w (Kroger, 1980; Dolle, 1991; Kessler, 1996). Semiautomated processes are the Berge-process (an oscillating suspended cloth method; Ramet, 1990; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997) and the 'Schulenberg processor' (specially constructed double bottom Quark vat; Jelen and Renz-Schauen, 1989). Q u a r k - original (standard) separator process
Skim milk is pasteurised (72 ~ for 40 s), cooled to 28-30 ~ and coagulated with a mesophilic culture and a small amount of rennet within ---16 h. Rennet (--2-20 ml standard strength rennet/1000 1 of milk) is usually added approximately 90 min after culture addition at a pH around 6.3. The coagulated skim milk is then stirred for ---10-15 min and passed through a tubular strainer to remove larger particles. After separation (34-40 ~ the Quark is cooled, optionally blended with cream or other condiments and packed. The whey discharged from the separator still contains nearly all, i.e., -0.65%, w/w, whey proteins and 0.2%, w/w, NPN (Siggelkow, 1984; Ramet, 1990; Dolle, 1991; Lehmann et al., 1991; Senge, 2002a). Whey proteins in the native, undenatured state do not gel under the heating and acidification conditions used in standard separator Quark production. Various methods have been developed to increase the whey protein content of Quark and reduce losses in the whey. Early methods recovered the whey proteins from the whey and incorporated them either into the Quark or the following day's cheese milk (Centriwhey and Lactal processes, uhrafihration of whey). In the Centriwhey Process, the Quark whey is heated to 95 ~ to precipitate the whey proteins which are concentrated to 12%, w/w, DM by centrifugation and then added back to the cheese milk for the next batch of Quark (Dolle, 1977, 1981; Kroger, 1980; Jelen and RenzSchauen, 1989). In the Westfalia Lactal process, the heat-precipitated whey proteins are allowed to settle, and by partial decanting of the supernatant, a whey concentrate of 7-8%, w/w, solids is obtained. This is further concentrated in a Quark separator into whey Quark (17-18%, w/w, solids) which is added to regular Quark at a level of 20%, w/w (Dolle, 1977; Kroger, 1980; Jelen and Renz-Schauen, 1989). Uhrafiltration can also be used to concentrate whey instead of separators (Herbertz, 1982; Kn~pfer, 1982; Kreuder and Liebermann, 1983).
316
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Q u a r k - Thermo process (Westfalia)
The milk is pasteurised at 95-96 ~ for 2-3 min to denature and co-precipitate the whey proteins onto the caseins. The resulting finer milk coagulum after fermentation requires a further heat treatment at --~60 ~ for 3 min (so-called thermisation) in order to enhance aggregation and improve sedimentation characteristics. The stirred curd is then cooled to separation temperature (Dolle, 1977; Ott, 1977; Kroger, 1980; Siggelkow, 1984; Jelen and Renz-Schauen, 1989; Ramet, 1990; Lehmann et al., 1991). The majority of Quark in Germany is produced by this process. Q u a r k - filtration methods
Filtration technology can be used at different stages during the manufacture of Quark-type products, e.g., filtration of the acid whey, (partial) filtration of the sweet milk or filtration of (partially) acidified milk. The yield is higher than for Thermoquark as all whey proteins are incorporated. However, the structure is different from conventional Quark as UF Quark is generally softer, smoother and creamier. This can be an advantage if consumed as such; however, for cheese-cakes or desserts, the higher firmness of conventional Quark and Cream cheese is more desirable. When full filtration to final cheese solids was carried out before acidification, the sensory attributes of the resulting products were described as impaired due to bitterness contributed by the slower rate of acidification, failure to reach the desired pH and the high calcium content (Dolle, 1977; Kroger, 1980; Kreuder and Liebermann, 1983; Btturle et al., 1984; Mann, 1984; Patel et al., 1986). Labneh produced by culturing UF milk retentate was also not satisfactory (Tamime et al., 1989b). This problem has been overcome by UF of partially (pH 5.7-5.95) or fully (pH 4.8-4.6) acidified milk. Low-protein fresh cheeses, like Ymer and Lactofil (--6%, w/w, protein), are easily produced by ultrafiltering milk (Tamime and Robinson, 1988; Nakazawa et al., 1991; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997). To produce UF Quark, acidified skim milk (pH 4.6) is heated to around 40 ~ and ultra- or micro-filtered to the desired DM content, cooled, optionally homogenised and packed (e.g., Btturle etal., 1984; Siggelkow, 1984; Dieu etal., 1990; Korolczuk and Mahaut, 1991a,b; Rogenhofer etal., 1994; Ottosen, 1996). The UF method gives complete recovery of whey proteins (native or denatured); however, NPN in the milk (-0.2%, w/w), is lost in the permeate. As native whey proteins are not retained during microfiltration, the curd is usually heat-treated (thermisation) before separating the curd form the whey (Dieu et al., 1990). Thermisation of the curd (60 ~ for 5 min)
before ultrafiltration also considerably reduces the development of stale, bitter and metallic flavours (Sachdeva et al., 1993; Rogenhofer et al., 1994). Ultrafiltration is carried out around 40-45 ~ in order to maintain good calcium solubility so as to remove calcium in the permeate (Ottosen, 1996). Quark and Labneh, ultrafiltered at higher temperatures, are described as gritty, granular and coarse (B~urle et al., 1984; Tamime et al., 1991a,b; Sachdeva et al., 1993). The viscosity of fresh cheeses produced by filtration is lower than of those manufactured by traditional technologies. In Germany, UF Quark is used only for Speisequarkzubereitungen (Quark preparations), as the possible slightly bitter flavour at the end of the shelf-life in plain Speisequark is not satisfactory. Several studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of the following during the manufacture of Quark using filtration methods: milk heat treatment, full (pH 4.6) or partial (pH 6.0) acidification of skim milk and type and configuration of membranes (Sachdeva etal., 1992a,b; Sharma etal., 1992a,b; Sharma and Reuter, 1993). Ultrafiltration using mineral membranes was found to be best for making Quark by UF from fully acidified skim milk (Sharma et al., 1992a; Sharma and Reuter, 1993). Recently, pilot-scale filtration methods have been developed by partially pre-concentrating the acidified milk in order to reduce the amount of acid whey. In the FML process (Forschungszentrum for Milch und Lebensmittel, Weihenstephan), skim milk is nanofiltered 2fold to 7%, w/w, protein and then fermented. The coagulum is stirred and concentrated by either ultrafiltration or separation. A separator needs to be adapted to the higher viscosity of the retentate coagulum in comparison to unconcentrated fermented skim milk. The texture of the final product is between that of conventional UF fresh cheese and of Thermoquark (Schkoda and Kessler, 1996, 1997a,b). Mucchetti et al. (2000) confirmed the findings of Schkoda and Kessler by nanofiltering milk 2.1-fold. In another method (Aubios process, Hannover), the skim milk is pre-concentrated 1.7-fold to 5.4%, w/w, protein (or up to 2.2-fold without causing bitterness) using microfiltration, producing a product which is similar to Thermoquark (Hulsen, 2002). A special combination of starter cultures is needed for the fermentation of retentates as more lactic acid must be formed than in unconcentrated milk. Pfalzer and Jelen (1994) enriched cheese milk with 25% sweet whey UF retentate containing 12%, w/w, DM and 4%, w/w, protein for an experimental Thermoquark-type fresh cheese produced using cheesecloth bags without significantly affecting the quality of the final product.
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Table 6 summarises the yield and whey protein recovery for the various methods. Q u a r k - recombination technology
Recombination technology is used to only a limited extent for the manufacture of Quark and related types. Fresh cheeses low in DM, like Frornage frais, can be produced by a method similar to yoghurt, i.e., skim milk is fortified with various milk proteins to approximately 14%, w/w, DM and then fermented. Labneh (a concentrated yoghurt with 23%, w/w, DM) can also be produced by direct recombination; fermentation at 23%, w/w, DM takes about 5-6 h in comparison with 3.5 h at 16%, w/w, DM (Ozer et al., 1999). Further treatments of the acid or acid/rennet gel
After fermentation, the gel is broken up by agitators and pumped through a sieve to the separators. Stirring the gel leads to breakage of the matrix strands, with the extent of breakage depending on the severity of the agitation. This non-Newtonian shear-thinning dispersion can be described rheologically by the Power-law model (Senge, 2002a). Increasing the temperature (25-50 ~ lowers the activation energy for aggregate interaction within the broken strands and facilitates the process of subsequent whey separation. A high pH (>4.6) at whey separation results in large losses of nitrogenous compounds in the whey (more casein fines) owing to greater physical damage to the softer gel. Any
317
factors which increase gel firmness at separation (e.g., rennet addition, higher level of gel-forming protein), will make it less susceptible to breakage for a given degree of shear and, therefore, reduce the amount of casein fines. Cooling of the gel to a temperature of Bingham (BH)
r-
1"0 4- 1 7 B H 5,
115
3.39
1.0
0.974
21.06
135
2.37
1.0
0.998
81
1.35
0.5
0.998
6.13
102
0.73
0.5
0.984
83
17.87
0.64
0.999
3.57
131
3.12
0.94
0.998
4.59
linear plastic, 2-dimensional Casson (CA)
Herschel-Bulkley
(HB)
r = ",Jroro+ ~/r/CA + 5'0 non-linear plastic, 2-dimensional r = 1"0 + K 5'n non-linear plastic, 3-dimensional
r, shear stress (Pa); r0, yield value (Pa) 5', shear rate s-l" r/, viscosity (Pa s)" K, consistency factor (Pa sion coefficient; s, standard deviation of shear stress (Pa) (Data from Senge, 2002a).
Cream cheese is produced from standardised (Double Cream Cheese (DCC), 8-12%, w/w, fat; Single Cream Cheese (SCC) 3.0-5.0%, w/w, fat), homogenised, pasteurised (72-75 ~ for 15-90s) milk or cream. Homogenisation is important for the following reasons: (i) it reduces fat loss on subsequent whey separation; (ii) it brings about, via coating of fat with casein and whey protein, the conversion of naturally emulsified fat globules into pseudo-protein particles which participate in gel formation on subsequent acidification. The incorporation of fat by this means into the gel structure gives a smoother and firmer curd (similar to yoghurt manufacture) and therefore is especially important for the quality of cold-pack Cream cheese for which the curd is not further treated (Guinee et al., 1993). Following pasteurisation, the milk is cooled (20-30 ~ inoculated at a level of 0.8-1.2%, with a D-type starter culture (Lactococcus lactis subsp, lactis, Lc. lactis subsp, cremoris and citrate-positive Lc. lactis subsp, lactis) and held at this temperature until the desired pH of 4.5-4.8 is reached. The resulting gel is agitated gently, optionally cooled to 10-12 ~ in order to prevent over-acidification, heated (80 ~ for up to 20 min) and deaerated. The curd is then concentrated by methods similar to those used for Quark, i.e., traditional method using bags, separator methods or UF methods. The acidified high-fat curd for DCC is obtained by centrifugal separ-
ation at 70-85 ~ 1996b).
12.7
5.11
sn); n, flow index; r, regres-
or UF at 50-55 ~
(Sanchez et al.,
Whey separation using separators
For separator-produced SCC, milk is standardised to 3.0-5.0%, w/w, fat. The specific weight of the cheese mass is greater than that of the whey and is separated outwards in the centrifuge during separation. The whey contains 0.2-0.5%, w/w, fat which can be reduced subsequently to ~-0.1%, w/w, by separation in a milk separator designed for this purpose (Lehmann et al., 1991). For separator-produced DCC, the milk is standardised to 8-12%, w/w, fat, giving a fat-protein mixture which has a lower specific density than that of the whey. At a fat content of 7%, w/w, the specific weights are too close to be separated by centrifugation (Dolle, 1991; Lehmann et al., 1991; Spreer, 1998). Whey separation using UF
Owing to the thick, viscous consistency of Cream cheese, concentration by UF necessitates a two-stage process (stage one: standard modules with centrifugal/positive displacement pumps; stage two: high-flow modules with positive displacement pumps) in order to maintain satisfactory flux rates and to obtain the correct DM level (Guinee etal., 1993). For fresh cheese, UF is normally carried out around 40-45 ~ for Cream cheese, 50-55 ~ can be used to improve throughput and reduce viscosity during concentration (Ottosen, 1996).
322
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Recombination technology
Recombination methods for experimental Cream cheesetype products include steps of combining a cheese base (e.g., dry Cottage cheese, Bakers cheese curd or fermented skim milk concentrate at pH 4.8-5.0) with emulsifying salts, bulking agents (e.g., buttermilk powder, corn syrup solids) and various gums (e.g., carrageenan or guar gum), followed by various heating, mixing and homogenisation steps (e.g., Baker, 198i; Crane, 1992). The advantage of these methods is that Cream cheese products can be formulated precisely to meet legal requirements without excess solids or butterfat. Another type of all-dairy Cream-type cheese is made by blending Ricotta cheese or Queso Blanco with a high-fat (58%, w/w) sour cream. The most critical aspect is proper dispersion of the large pieces of curd with the liquid components. The blend is standardised with cultured buttermilk, if necessary, pasteurised, homogenised and hot-packed. The final product has ---59%, w/w, moisture, 30%, w/w, fat and a pH of 5.29-5.55, depending on the cheese base used (Modler et al., 1985; Kakib and Modler, 1985a,b). Further treatments of curd after separation
In most cases, the curds are heat-treated (70-95 ~ mixed with salt (0.5-2.0%, w/w) and stabilisers (mainly hydrocolloids), homogenised (two-stage at 15-25 MPa at 65-85 ~ and either hot-packed or cold-packed after cooling to 10-20 ~ in a scraped-surface heat exchanger (Walenta etal., 1988; Sanchez etal., 1996b). Locust bean gum (0.30-0.35%, w/w), carrageenan (0.15%, w/w), xanthan gum, tara gum and sodium alginate are the most widely used stabilisers for hot-pack Cream cheese (Hunt and Maynes, 1997; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997). Guar gum on its own gives a high processing viscosity, a soft body and undesirable texture. A synergistic effect of n-carrageenan on the gelling properties of tara gum was observed in Cream cheese (Hunt and Maynes, 1997). The extent of 'creaming' (emulsification and thickening) is influenced by the degree of heat and shear and the duration of cooking and has a major influence on the consistency of the final product. Increasing the holding time and shear during cooking generally results in a firmer product with an increasingly brittle texture (Walenta et al., 1988; Guinee et al., 1993). Static cooling of hot-pack cheeses gives a firmer texture than dynamic cooling (cold-pack cheeses; Jaupert and Vesperini, 1989; Mahaut, 1990; Sanchez et al., 1994b). The cheese firmness is already reduced by lowering the filling temperature from 85 to 75 ~ (Walenta et al., 1988). Cold-pack Cream cheese has a somewhat spongy, aerated consistency and a coarse appearance (Guinee et al., 1993).
The main particles structuring DCC, i.e., milk fat globules and milk proteins, undergo several thermal treatments, and therefore large temperature fluctuations and shear stresses during processing. Such technological treatments change the structure of particles (size, shape, state of aggregation) and physico-chemical properties (charge density and hydration of milk proteins, solid/liquid milk fat ratio and milk fat globule stability). The resulting micro- and macro-structural arrangements of particles, as well as the nature of interactions, mainly determine the texture and stability of DCC (Sanchez et al., 1996b). Jaupert and Vesperini (1989), Mahaut (1990), Sanchez et al. (1994a,b, 1996a,b,c), Sanchez and Hardy (1997) investigated the effects of processing parameters on the structure and stability of DCC. Cream cheese becomes firmer and more elastic after heating and homogenisation, and softer and more viscous after mixing and cooling. TEM and SEM show that the rheological changes during manufacture are correlated with aggregation (during heating and homogenisation) and disruption (during cooling) of milk fat globule/casein complexes. Dispersion of the fat globule clusters, formed on homogenisation, after cooling and aggregation of milk fat globules during storage causes structural instability to occur in Cream cheese. The following stages for structuring and destructuring processes occurred during the manufacture of experimental DCC (Sanchez et al., 1996c; Sanchez and Hardy, 1997): 9 Starting curd after centrifugal separation: Casein-fat
globule aggregates are first produced during curd formation. 9 Blending with water, salt and heat-denatured whey proteins: The casein-fat globule aggregates are destroyed
during blending of curd with ingredients. Fat globule destabilisation (e.g., coalescence) occurs during this stage. 9 Heat treatment: The broken aggregates reaggregate on heat treatment, but with extensive fat globule aggregation and coalescence. Leakage of oil and creaming can occur at the outlet of the heat exchanger. 9 Homogenisation: Emulsification of the system occurs during high-pressure homogenisation with strong clustering of fat globules, caused by a 'polymerbridging' mechanism. When homogenisation pressure is increased from 0 to 50 MPa, the firmness of DCC increases due to a stronger structural organisation within the cheese (Sanchez et al., 1994a). 9 Cooling: Homogenisation clusters are destroyed by high shear stresses developed in the heat exchanger during cooling to 20 ~ This effect is even more pronounced w h e n the final curd temperature is
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
below 20 ~ (Sanchez et al., 1994b). The cooling rate and final temperature are the main factors for instability. An increase in curd cooling rate leads to a softer cheese with weaker structural organisation (reduced storage and loss moduli). Rheological and syneretic aspects of Cream cheese
TEM and cryo-SEM studies showed that DCC is structured mainly by compact casein/milk fat globule aggregates occluding large whey-containing areas, as well as partly coalesced milk fat globules. No rigid protein matrix was observed because of stirring and homogenisation of the curd during manufacture (Kahib et al., 1981; Kal~ib and Modler, 1985a,b; Sanchez et al., 1996b). The corpuscular structure seems to be responsible for good spreadability with a high moisture content facilitating the mobility of the corpuscular constituents during spreading (Kahib and Modler, 1985a,b). Double Cream cheese exhibits viscoelastic-plastic rheological behaviour with an unusual flow curve; the shear stress in the ascending shear rate curve shows, depending on the manufacturing stages, two or three peaks. The first peak is commonly referred to as the static yield value (Sanchez et al., 1994b, 1996c). The complex rheological behaviour of DCC indicates a 3-dimensional gel-like structure (Sanchez et al., 1994a). Double Cream cheese shows timedependent flow behaviour (partially thixotropic) and dynamic viscoelastic properties similar to those of non-chemically cross-linked polymers or pharmaceutical creams (Sanchez et al., 1994a,b, 1996c). Senge (2002b) also measured various cream cheese types in the oscillation and rotation mode.
Fresh cheese preparations (Frischk~isezubereitungen) are blends of Quark, Cream cheese or Cottage cheese with cream and up to 30%, w/w, fruit or vegetable preparations or up to 15%, w/w, of fruits, spices, herbs or other seasoning (KOseverordnung, Cheese order; Anon, 1986). A foamy consistency can be obtained by admixing nitrogen. Fresh cheese preparations can be heat-treated to increase shelf-life and may contain stabilisers. The components can be blended by either continuous in-line mixing or batch mixing (Lehmann et al., 1991; Kosikowski and Mistry, 1997; Spreer, 1998).
Acid-curd cheeses (Sauermilchkase), typical examples of which are Harzer, Mainzer or Olmatzer Quargel cheese, have a very strong flavour and odour, a white
323
to slightly yellow colour and a slightly brittle texture (Spreer, 1998). There are mould-ripened cheeses and yellow cheeses which have been treated with a 'smear' of red culture (Brevibacterium linens). Ripened acidcurd cheeses are generally produced in specialised plants which buy the acid Quark from dairies. The acid Quark used for these cheeses is produced by acid coagulation (cold: 1-2% mesophilic starter at 22-27 ~ in 15-20 h or warm: 2-5%, thermophilic culture at 40-45 ~ in 1.5-3.0 h). The coagulum is cut and cooked at 35-45 ~ while stirring until the granules are 2-4 cm in size. Whey is drained using filter bags or decanters. Acid Quark has a DM content >32%, w/w (pH --~4.6) and is granulated in a Quark mill and chilled below 10 ~ (Kessler, 1996; Bruckert, 1998; Spreer, 1998). In the manufacture of the cheese, 2-3%, w/w, of salt and caraway seeds are added, as well as NaHCO3 and CaCO3 (0.5-1.0%, w/w) to influence ripening (acceleration, neutralisation). The mass is mixed, milled, moulded into bars and spread on racks and then subjected to the following processes: drying at 18 ~ for 15 h; sweating at 20-25 ~ and 90% relative humidity for 2-3 days, ripening at 12-16 ~ and 90% relative humidity for 3 days and further ripening at 10-15 ~ After sweating, the cheeses are washed with salt water plus a culture of B. linens or sprayed with a culture consisting of Penicillium candidum and P. camemberti. The cheese ripens from the outside to the centre and is ready for distribution when up to 25% of the cheese mass is ripened, i.e., when the outside has a translucent, yellow appearance, even though the interior (75% of the cheese mass) is still white, dry, hard and crumbly and unripened. Cooked cheese (Kochk~ise, Topfk~ise), also manufactured from Quark, is a different type of cheese, usually with 20%, w/w, FDM. During ripening at 18-22 ~ for 3-6 days, the surface turns greasy and the pH increases to 5.5-6.0. Water, butterfat, salt, NaHCO3 and CaCO3 and caraway seeds are added to the cheese blend which is heated in a jacketed vessel at 70-110 ~ for 10-20 min. The hot cheese is filled into cups or pots (Kessler, 1996; Spreer, 1998).
Layered cheese (Schichtkiise)
German Layered cheese has a firm coagulated (gel-like) consistency with a middle layer which is higher in fat and therefore darker in colour. One-third of the cheese milk can be standardised to a higher fat level and/or colouring may be added. Standardisation of fat content must be carried out in the cheese milk, as it cannot be done in the drained curd without destroying the firm
324
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
coagulated structure. Layered cheese is classified as a quarter-fat cheese (10%, w/w, FDM, Table 2), even though the middle layer has a higher fat content. The fermentation temperature is about 25 ~ the amount of rennet added is slightly higher than for Quark in order to shorten the gelation time by 3-4 h. The strong gel is cut into cubes (approximately 2 • 2 cm) and the curd then transferred into moulds starting with a lowfat white layer, followed by the yellow high-fat layer and finished with a low-fat white layer (Spreer, 1998).
Mascarpone Mascarpone, a high-fat ('--50%, w/w, fat) firm, spreadable fresh cheese with a mild buttery, slightly tangy flavour, is produced by direct acidification with an organic acid, instead of lactic acid bacteria, to a pH of about 5.0-5.8. Cream with 30%, w/w, fat is heated to 80-95 ~ organic acid added slowly and stirred for 10 min. Whey drainage takes about 16-24 h. To increase shelf-life, Mascarpone is usually heat-treated. No stabilisers are necessary due to the high fat content (Kessler, 1996).
The authors wish to thank Tim Guinee (Dairy Products Research Centre, Fermoy, Ireland) and Liam Gallagher (Dairygold Cooperative Society, Mitchelstown, Ireland) for useful comments on the manuscript.
Allan-Woitas, P. and Kal~ib, M. (1984). A simple procedure for the preparation of stirred yoghurt for scanning electron microscopy. Food Microstruct. 3, 197-198. Ammar, E.T.M.A., E1-Shazly, A.A., Nasr, M.M. and Omar, I.M.I. (1999). Comparative study of recombined Labneh, with buffalo and cow milk Labneh. II. Effect of different levels of rennet. Egypt. J. Dairy Sci. 27, 301-315. Anon (1984). Quark from uhrafiltration concentrates. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 35, 1000, 1002-1004. Anon (1986). German Cheese order (Kaseverordnung), 14 April 1986 BGB1. I S.412, in, Lebensmittelrecht, Vol. 1, Zipfel, W. and Rathke, K.-D. (2001). Verlag C.H. Beck, Munich. Anon (1994a). Consumption statistics for milk and milk products 1992. Bulletin 295. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 1-6. Anon (1994b). Dutch cheese order (Warenwet Decree on Dairy Products), 25 October 1994, Art. 13. Attia, H., Bennasar, M., Lagaude, A., Hugodot, B., Rouviere, J. and Tarodo de la Fuente, B. (1993). Ultrafiltration with a microfiltration membrane of acid skimmed and fatenriched milk coagula: hydrodynamic, microscopic and rheological approaches. J. Dairy Res. 60, 161-174.
Baker, D.B. (1981). Preparation of low fat imitation cream cheese. Pro Mark Companies, assignee. US Pat. No. 4, 244,983. Banon, S. and Hardy, J. (1992). A colloidal approach of milk acidification by glucono-delta-lactone. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 935-941. B~turle, H.W., Walenta, W. and Kessler, H.G. (1984). Herstellung von Magerquark mit Hilfe der Ultrafiltration. DMZ Deutsche Molkereizeitung 105,356-363. Bishop, J.R., Bodine, A.B. and Janzen, J.J. (1983). Electron microscopic comparison of curd microstructures of Cottage cheese coagulated with and without microbial rennin. Cult. Dairy Prod. J. 8 (1), 14-16. Bodor, J., Koning, M.M., Schmidt, M. and Stratmann, W. (1996). Process for preparing fresh cheese and fresh cheese obtainable thereby. Unilever NV, assignee. WO Pat. No. 9,637,114. Boone, M. (2001a). Cheese composition of the Quark type, and method for preparing fresh low-fat cheese. Marc Boone NV, assignee. WO Pat. No. 0,115,541. Boone, M. (2001b). New composition and method for preparing basic Quark and further processing of the basic Quark. Mark Boone NV, assignee. WO Pat. No. 0,178,518. Bruckert, W. (1998). Sauermilchk~se. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 49,493-494. Crane, L.A. (1992). Method of manufacture of a non-fat cream cheese product. Gen Foods, Inc., assignee. US Pat. No. 5,079,027. Creamer, L.K. (1985). Water absorption by renneted casein micelles. Milchwissenschaft 40, 589-591. Dalgleish, D.G. (1992). The enzymatic coagulation of milk, in, Advanced Dairy Chemistry - 1. Proteins, Fox, P.E, ed., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London. pp. 157-187. Dalgleish, D.G. and Law, A.J.R. (1989). pH-induced dissociation of bovine casein micelles, II. Mineral solubilization and its relation to casein release. J. Dairy Res. 56, 727-735. Dalgleish, D.G. and Horne, D.S. (1991). Studies of gelation of acidified and renneted milks using diffusing wave spectroscopy. Milchwissenschaft 46, 417-422. Desachy, P. and Parmantier, C. (1998). Fresh cheese. Nestl~ SA, assignee. WO Pat. No. 9,827,825. Dieu, B., Cuq, J., Tarodo de la Fuente, B., Bennesar, M. and Desroches, J.M. (1990). Method for producing cheese by means of microfiltration. Valmont SA, assignee. WO Pat. No. 8,804,141. Dolle, E. (1977). Technik des Therm~ Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 22,709-712. Dolle, E. (1981). Erkenntnisse tiber das Westfalia-ThermoSpeisequark-Verfahren. Molkereizeitung-Welt der Milch 35,628-629,632-633. Dolle, E. (1991). Developments in Quarg processing. Dairy Ind. Int. 56 (9), 27-29. E1-Tahra, M.A.A., E1-Shazly, A.A., Nasr, M.M. and Omar, I.M.I. (1999). Comparative study on recombined Labneh, with buffalo and cow milk labneh. I. Effect of salt level on consumer acceptability. Egypt. J. Dairy Sci. 27, 127-139. Fem~indez-Albalat, M.P., Fernandez, M.A., Mendez, J. and Cobos,/it. (2001). Studies on the application of ultrafiltration for the manufacture of Cebreiro cheese. Milchwissenschaft 56, 392-394.
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Fox, RE and Mulvihill, D.M. (1990). Casein, in, Food Gels: Casein, Harris, R, ed., Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 121-173. Fox, RE, O'Connor, T.P., McSweerly, P.L.H., Guirlee, T.P. and O'Brieni, N.M. (1996). Cheese: physical, biochemical and nutritional aspects. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 39, 163-328. Gastaldi, E., Pellegrini, O., Lagaude, A. and Tarodo de la Fuenite, B. (1994). Functions of added calcium in acid milk coagulation. J. Food Sci. 59, 310-312,320. Gastaldi, E., Lagaude, A. and Tarodo de la Fuente, B. (1996). Micellar transition state in casein between pH 5.5 and 5.0. J. Food Sci. 61, 59-64. Guinee, T.R, Pudia, RD. and Farkye, N.Y. (1993). Fresh acidcurd cheese varieties, in, Cheese- Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology. Vol. 2, Major Cheese Groups, Fox, RE, ed., Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 363-419. Hammelehle, B. (1994). Die Direktsauerung von Milch. Untersuchungen zur gezielten EinfluJ~nahme auf Textur und Konsistenz gesauerter Milchgele. PhD Thesis, TU M(mchen-Weihenstephan. Harwalker, V.R. and Kalab, M. (1980). Milk gel structure. XI. Electron microscopy of gluconio-deha-lactonie-induced skim milk gels. J. Texture Studies 11, 35-49. Hawel, L. and Heikal, Y. (1994). Lagerstabilittit unid rheologische Eigenschafteni. Internationale Zeitschrift ffir Lebensmittel-Technik, Marketing, Verpackung und Analytik. 45, 36-38. Heertje, I., Visser, J. and Smits, R (1985). Structure formation in acid milk gels. Food Microstruct. 4, 267-277. Herbert, S., Riaublanic, A., Bouchet, B., Gallant, D.J. and Dufour, E. (1999). Fluorescence spectroscopy investigation of acid- or rennet-induced coagulation of milk. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 2056-2062. Herbertz, G. (1982). Der Einisatz voni SpiralmembraniUltrafihrationsanlagen in der Milchwirtschaft. Dtsch. Molkereizeit. 103, 1055-1056. Hinirichs, J. (2001). Incorporation of whey proteins in cheese. Int. Dairy J. 11,495-503. Hoffmann, W. (1994). Auswirkungen mikropartikulierter Molkenproteinie auf die Konisisteniz fettarmer Speisequarkzubereitungen. Milchwissenschaft 49, 312-315. Hoffmann, W. anid Buchheim, W. (1994). Mikropartikulierte Molkeniproteinie in Speisequarkzubereitunigen. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 45,184-187. Home, D.S. (1998). Casein interactions: casting light on the black boxes, the structure in dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 8, 171-177. Hunt, C.C. and Maynes, J.R. (1997). Current issues in the stabilisation of cultured dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 2639-2643. Hurley, M.J., Larseni, L.B., Kelly, A.L. and McSweeney, RL.H. (2000). Cathepsin D activity in Quarg. Int. Dairy J. 10, 453-458. Hulseni, U. (2002). Aherniativeni zur Vorbehanidlunig der Prozessmilch bei der Herstellunig von Frischk/~se. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 53,766-768. Jaupert, G. and Vesperinii, A. (1989). Texture des fromages de ch~vre type 'pate fraiche salve': influenide de l'homog~ni~isationi et du traitemenit thermique du fromage.
325
Revue des Ecoles Nationales d'Industrie Laitiere 138, 13-18. Jelen, R and Renz-Schauen, A. (1989). Quarg manufacturing innovations and their effects on quality, nutritive value, and consumer acceptance. Food Technol. 43, 74-81. Kalab, M. and Modler, W. (1985a). Development of microstructure in a cream cheese based on Queso Blanico cheese. Food Microstruct. 4, 89-98. Kahib, M. and Modler, W. (1985b). Milk gel structure. XV. Electron microscopy of whey protein based Cream cheese spread. Milchwissenschaft 40, 193-196. Kalab, M., Sarganit, A.G. and Froehlich, D.A. (1981). Electron microscopy and sensory evaluation of commercial cream cheese. Scanning Electron Microsc. 3,473-482, 514. Kelly, A.L. and O'Donnell, H.J. (1998). Composition, gel properties and microstructure of Quarg as affected by processing parameters and milk quality. Int. Dairy J. 8, 295-301. Kelly, RM. and O'Kenniedy, B.T. (2001). The effect of casein/whey protein ratio and minerals on the rheology of fresh cheese gels using a model system. Int. Dairy J. 11, 525-532. Kessler, H.G. (1996). K/~setechnologie- Milcheiweit~produkte, in, Lebensmittel- und Bioverfahrenstechnik-Molkereitechnologie, A., Kessler, Munich. pp. 424-454. Kim, B.Y. arid Kinisella, J.E. (1989). Effect of temperature and pH on the coagulation of casein. Milchwissenschaft 44, 622-625. Kniupfer, H. (1982). Quarkausbeute - Uhrafihrationi. Molkereizeitung-Welt der Milch 36, 559-562. Korolczuk, J. (1993). Flow behaviour of low solids fresh cheeses. J. Dairy Res. 60, 593-601. Korolczuk, J. (1996). Rheological properties of fresh cheeses by compression-relaxation method. II. Stress evolution during relaxation period. Milchwissenschaft 51, 148-150. Korolczuk, J. and Mahaut, M. (1989). Viscometric studies on acid type cheese texture. J. Texture Stud. 20, 169-178. Korolczuk, J. and Mahaut, M. (1991a). Consistency of acid fresh cheese: role of whey proteins. Milchwissenschaft 46, 153-156. Korolczuk, J. and Mahaut, M. (1991b). Effect of whey proteins and heat treatment of milk on the consistency of UF fresh cheese. Milchwissenschaft 46,435-437. Kosikowski, EV. and Mistry, V.V. (1997). Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods. Volume I: Origins and Principles, 3rd edni, EV., Kosikowski, L.C.C. Westport, CT. Kreuder, K. and Liebermann, A. (1983). Versuche zur Herstellung von Frischktise mit Uhrafihration. Dtsch. Molkereizeitung 104,925-927. Kroger, M. (1980). The manufacture of Quarg cheese. Cult. Dairy Prod. J. 15 (8), 11-14. Law, A.J.R., Home, D.S., Banks, J.M. and Leaver, J. (1994). Heat-induced changes in the whey proteins and caseins. Milchwissenschaft 49, 63-67. Lehembre, N. (1986). Contribution fa l'~tude de la cinietique de coagulation mixte d'uni lait reconistitue suivie par une m~thode rhr effet du calcium et etude multifactorielle de l'inifluence te la temperature, du pH et de la dose de prCsure. ISAA Science et Techniologie Alimentaire, INA Paris-Grognon, DAA ENSA Toulouse, France.
326
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Lehmann, H.R., Dolle, E. and Bticker, H. (1991). Processing Lines for the Production of Soft Cheese, 3rd edn, Westfalia Separator AG, Oelde, Germany. Lucey, J.A. (1995). Effect of heat treatment on the rennet coagulability of milk, in, Heat-Induced Changes in Milk, Fox, P.E, ed., Special Issue 9501, International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 171-187. Lucey, J.A., van Vliet, T., Grolle, K., Geurts, T. and Walstra, P. (1997). Properties of acid casein gels made by acidification with glucono-8-1actone. 2. Syneresis, permeability and microstructural properties. Int. Dairy J. 7, 389-397. Lucey, J.A., Tamehana, M., Singh, H. and Munro, P.A. (2000). Rheological properties of milk gels formed by a combination of rennet and glucono-8-1actone. J. Dairy Res. 67,415-427. Lucey, J.A., Tamehana, M., Singh, H. and Munro, P.A. (2001). Effect of heat treatment on the physical properties of milk gels made with both rennet and acid. Int. DairyJ. 11,559-565. Mahaut, M. (1990). Approfondissement des Connaissances sur la Nature des Me.canismes Physiques et Biochimiques Intervenant sur les Proprid.td.s Rhd.ologiques des Fromages Frais. PhD Thesis, ENSA, Rennes. Mahaut, M. and Korolczuk, J. (1992). Effect of whey proteins and heat treatment of milk on the viscosity of UF fresh cheese. Milchwissenschaft 47, 157-159. Mann, E. (1978a). Quarg and tvorog (Part 1). Dairy Ind. Int. 43 (4), 42-43. Mann, E. (1978b). Quarg and tvorog (Part 2). Dairy Ind. Int. 43 (5), 36-39. Mann, E. (1982). Quarg. Dairy Ind. Int. 47 (3), 33-34. Mann, E. (1984). Quarg. Dairy Ind. Int. 49 (12), 13-14. Mann, E. (1987). Quarg and tvorog. Dairy Ind. Int. 52 (8), 12-13. Mann, E. (1994). Quarg and related products. Dairy Ind. Int. 59 (2), 19-20. Mann, E. (1997). Cottage cheese and related products. Dairy Ind. Int. 62 (9), 15-16. Mann, E. (2000). Cheese product innovations. Dairy Ind. Int. 65 (10), 17-18. Mara, O. and Kelly, A.L. (1998). Contribution of milk enzymes, starter and rennet to proteolysis during storage of Quarg. Int Dairy J. 8,973-979. Mehaia, M.A. and Cheryan, M. (1983). The secondary phase of milk coagulation: effect of calcium, pH and temperature on clotting activity. Milchwissenschaft 38, 137-140. Mehaia, M.A. and E1-Khadragy, S.M. (1999). Compositional characteristics and sensory evaluation of Labneh made from goat's milk. Milchwissenschaft 54, 567-569. Modler, W. and Kalab, M. (1983). Microstructure of yoghurt stabilized with milk proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 430-437. Modler, W., Larmond, M.E., Lin, C.S., Froehlich, D. and Emmons, D.B. (1983). Physical and sensory properties of yoghurt stabilized with milk proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 422-429. Modler, H.W., Poste, L.M. and Butler, G. (1985). Sensory evaluation of an all-dairy formulated Cream-type cheese produced by a new method. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 2835-2839.
Mucchetti, G., Zardi, G., Orlandini, E and Gostoli, C. (2000). The pre-concentration of milk by nanofiltration in the production of Quarg-type fresh cheeses. Lait 80, 43-50. Nakazawa, Y., Furusawa, M., Hohno, H. and Shida, T. (1991). Proteolysis of quarg manufactured from milk concentrated by ultrafiltration. Milchwissenschaft 46,640-644. Noel, Y. (1989). Comparaison des cinetiques de coagulation enzymatique et mixte du lait. Influence du calcium. Lait 69,479-490. No~l, Y., Durier, C., Lehembre, N. and Kobilinsky, A. (1991). Etude muhifactorielle de la coagulation mixte du lait analys~e par viscoelasticimCtrie. Lait 71, 15-39. O'Kennedy, B.T. and Kelly, P.M. (2000). Evaluation of milk protein interactions during acid gelation using a simulated yoghurt model. Milchwissenschaft 55, 187-190. Ott, H. (1977). Erfahrungen und Betriebsergebnisse mit dem Westfalia Thermo-Speisequark-Herstellungsverfahren. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 22,721-722. Ottosen, N. (1996). The use of membranes for the production of fermented cheese. Bulletin 311. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 18-20. Ozer, B.H., Bell, A.E., Grandison, A.S. and Robinson, R.K. (1998). Rheological properties of concentrated yogurt (Labneh). J. Texture Stud. 29, 67-79. Ozer, B.H., Stenning, R.A., Grandison, A.S. and Robinson, R.K. (1999). Rheology and microstructure of Labneh (concentrated Yogurt). J. Dairy Sci. 82,682-689. Patel, P.S., Reuter, H. and Prokopek, D. (1986). Production of quarg by uhrafihration. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 39, 27-31. Pfalzer, K. and Jelen, P. (1994). Manufacture of thermoquarg from mixtures of UF-retentate of sweet whey and skimmilk. Milchwissenschaft 49,490-494. Puhan, Z. and Fltieler, O. (1974). Auswirkung der thermischen Behandlung yon Milch auf die Verteilurlg der N-Fraktionen in der Milch und der Molke nach der Quarkherstellung. Milchwissenschaft 29, 148-151. Ramet, J.P. (1990). The production of fresh cheese in France. Dairy Ind. Int. 55 (6), 49-52. Richarts, E. (2001). ZMP Review Dairy 2 0 0 1 - Germany, European Union. R6ckseisen, A. (1987). Vier Jahre Quarkherstellung mit direkter Ultrafiltration. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 15,455-456. Roefs, S.P.EM. (1986). Structure of Acid Casein Gels: A Study of Gels Formed after Acidification in the Cold. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen. Roefs, S.P.EM., van Vliet, T., van den Bijgaart, H.J.C.M., de Groot-Mostert, A.E.A. and Walstra, P. (1990). Structure of casein gels made by combined acidification and rennet action. Neth. Milk DairyJ. 44, 159-188. Rogenhofer, M., Hauss, E. and Mailer, J. (1994). Herstellung von Topfen mittels UF-Vollkonzentration- m6gliche Unterschiede zur traditionellen Technologie. Milchwirtschaftliche Berichte 118, 51-56. Rouyer, B. (1997). The Czech Republic: good prospects for foreign cheeses. Revue Laitiere Francaise 570, 28-29. Sachdeva, S., Reuter, H., Prokopek, D. and Klobes, H. (1992a). Ultrafiltration of heated, acidic and coagulated
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
skim milk with different modules. Part 1. Plate and frame type module. Kieler Milchwirtsch. Forschungsberichte 44, 17-26. Sachdeva, S., Reuter, H., Prokopek, D. and Klobes, H. (1992b). Ultrafiltration of heated, acidic and coagulated skim milk with different modules. Part 2. Spiral wound module. Kieler Milchwirtsch. Forschungsberichte 44, 27-34. Sachdeva, S., Reuter, H., Prokopek, D. and Klobes, H. (1993). Technological aspects of Quarg making by ultrafiltration of coagulated milk. Cult. Dairy Prod. J. 28 (4), 21-26. Sanchez, C. and Hardy, J. (1997). Structuring and stability of double cream cheese. Eur. Dairy Mag. 9 (4), 8-10. Sanchez, C., Beauregard, J.L., Chassagne, M.H., Bimbenet, J.J. and Hardy, J. (1994a). Rheological and textural behaviour of double cream cheese. I. Effect of curd homogenization. J. Food Eng. 23,579-594. Sanchez, C., Beauregard, J.L., Chassagne, M.H., Duquenoy, A. and Hardy, J. (1994b). Rheological and textural behaviour of double cream cheese. II. Effect of curd cooling rate. J. Food Eng. 23,595-608. Sanchez, C., Beauregard, J.L., Bimbenet, J.J. and Hardy, J. (1996a). Flow properties, firmness and stability of double cream cheese containing whey protein concentrate. J. Food Sci. 61,840-843. Sanchez, C., Beauregard, J.L., Bride, M., Buchheim, W. and Hardy, J. (1996b). Rheological and microstructural characterization of double cream cheese. Nahrung 40, 108-116. Sanchez, C., Beauregard, J.L., Chassagne, M.H., Bimbenet, J.J. and Hardy, J. (1996c). Effects of processing on rheology and structure of double cream cheese. Food Res. Int. 28, 547-552. Schkoda, P. (1998). Serumbindung und Rheologie fermentierter Milchprodukte. Modellierung yon Strukturparametern. PhD Thesis, Technical University, Munich. Schkoda, R and Kessler, H.G. (1996). Manufacture of fresh cheese from ultrafiltered milk with reduced amount of acid whey. Bulletin 311. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 33-35. Schkoda, P. and Kessler, H.G. (1997a). Das neue FMLFrischk~tseverfahren. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 48, 36-41. Schkoda, P. and Kessler, H.G. (1997b). Revolutionary new process for the manufacture of fresh cheese. Eur. Dairy Mag. 2 (2), 26-28. Schkoda, P., Hechler, A. and Hinrichs, J. (2001a). Influence of the protein content on structural characteristics of stirred fermented milk. Milchwissenschafi 56, 19-22. Schkoda, P., Hechler, A. and Hinrichs, J. (2001b). Improved texture of stirred fermented milk by integrating fat globules into the gel structure. Milchwissenschaft 56, 85-89. Schulz, D. (2000). Untersuchung yon Strukturierungsvorganyen bei der Lab- und Sauregerinnung yon Milch. (Investigation into Structure Formation Processes of Milk during Renneting and Acidifcation). PhD Thesis, Technical University, Berlin. Schulz, D., Senge, B. and Krenkel, K. (1999). Investigations into the combined enzymatic and lactic acid milk coagulation. Milchwissenschaft 54,363-367.
327
Sebastiani, H., Gelsomino, R. and Walser, H. (1998). Cultures for the improvement of texture in quarg. Proc. Syrnp. Texture of Fermented Milk Products and Dairy Desserts, Vicenza, May 1997. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 78-92. Senge, B. (2002a). Rheologische Besonderheiten von Frischkase - Konsequenzen zur Optimierung der Prozesstechnik. Dtsch. Molkereizeitung 14, 26-33. Senge, B. (2002b). Materialwissenschaftliche Untersuchung von past6sen Milchprodukten. Unpublished results. Technical University Berlin. Senge, B., Krenkel, K. and Ringer, C. (1998). Rheologische Charakterisierung von Speisequark. Dtsch. Milchwirtschaft 49, 65-67. Shah, N., Jelen, P. and Ujvarosy, S. (1990). Rennet effects and partitioning of bacterial cultures during quarg cheese manufacture. J. Food Sci. 55,398-400. Sharma, D.K. and Reuter, H. (1993). Quarg-making ultrafiltration using polymeric and mineral membrane modules: a comparative performance study. Lait 73,303-310. Sharma, D.K., Reuter, H., Prokopek, D. and Klobes, H. (1992a). Ultrafiltration of heated, acidic and coagulated skim milk with different modules. Part 3. Mineral membrane modules. Kieler Milchwirtsch. Forschungsberichte 44, 35-46. Sharma, D.K., Reuter, H., Prokopek, D. and Klobes, H. (1992b). Ultrafiltration of heated, acidic and coagulated skim milk with different modules. Part 4. Hollow fibres modules. Kieler Milchwirtsch. Forschungsberichte 44, 47-54. Sheth, H., Jelen, P., Ozimek, L. and Sauer, W. (1988). Yield, sensory properties and nutritive value of Quarg produced from lactose-hydrolysed and high heated milk. J. Dairy Sci. 71,2891-2897. Siggelkow, M.A. (1984). Modern methods in quarg production for consumer sale. Dairy Ind. Int. 49 (6), 17-21. Singh, H. (1995). Heat-induced changes in casein, including interactions with whey proteins, in, Heat induced Changes of Milk, Fox, P.E, ed., Special Issue 9501, International Dairy Federation, Brussels. pp. 86-104. Smits, P. and van Brouwershaven, J.H. (1980). Heat-induced association of [~-lactoglobulin and casein micelles. J. Dairy Res. 47, 313-325. Sohal, T.S., Roehl, D. and Jelen, p. (1988). A survey for quarg acceptance by Canadian consumers. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 21, 312-315. Sorensen, H.H. (1995). The world market for cheese. Bulletin 307. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. Sorensen, H.H. (2001). The world market for cheese. Bulletin 359. International Dairy Federation, Brussels. Spreer, E. (1998). Cheese manufacture, in, Milk and Dairy Product Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel. pp. 245-319. Tamime, A.Y. and Robinson, R.K. (1988). Fermented milks and their future trends. Part II. Technological aspects. J. Dairy Res. 55,281-307. Tamime, A.Y., Davies, G., Chehade, A.S. and Mahdi, H.A. (1989a). The production of 'Labneh' by ultrafiltration: a new technology. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 42, 35-39.
328
Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties
Tamime, A.Y., Kalab, M. and Davies, G. (1989b). Rheology and microstructure of strained yoghurt (Labneh) made from cow's milk by three different methods. Food Microstruct. 8, 125-135. Tamime, A.Y., Davies, G., Chehade, A.S. and Mahdi, H.A. (1991a). The effect of processing temperatures on the quality of Labneh made by ultrafiltration. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 44, 99-103. Tamime, A.Y., Kal~ib, M. and Davies, G. (1991b). The effect of processing temperatures on the microstructure and firmness of labneh made from cow's milk by the traditional method or by ultrafiltration. Food Struct. 10, 345-352. Tamime, A.Y., Kalab, M. and Davies, G. (199 lc). Microstructure and firmness of Labneh (high solids yoghurt) made from cow's, goat's and sheep's milks by a traditional method or by ultrafiltration. Food Struct. 10, 37-44. Tranchant, C.C. (2000). Coagulation Behaviour of Differently Acidified and Renneted Milk and the Effects of Pre-treatment of Milk. PhD Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario. Tranchant, C.C., Dalgleish, D.G. and Hill, A.R. (2001). Different coagulation behaviour of bacteriologically acidified and renneted milk: the importance of fine-tuning acid production and rennet action. Int. Dairy J. 11, 483-494. Tscheuschner, H.-D. and Nimbs, H. (1993). Milch und Milchprodukte, in, Rheologie der Lebensmittel, Weipert, D., ed., Behr's Verlag, Hamburg. pp. 503-542.
van Hooydonk, A.C.M., Boerrigter, IJ. and Hagedoorn, H.G. (1986a). pH-induced physico-chemical changes of casein micelles in milk and their effect on renneting. 2. Effect of pH on renneting of milk. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 40, 297-313. van Hooydonk, A.C.M., Hagedoorn, H.G. and Boerrigter, IJ. (1986b). pH-induced physico-chemical changes of casein micelles in milk and their effect on renneting. 1. Effect of acidification on physicochemical properties. Neth. Milk Dairy d. 40, 281-296. van Vliet, T., van Dijk, HJ.M., Zoon, P. and Walstra, P. (1991). Relation between syneresis and rheological properties of particle gels. Colloid Polym. Sci. 269, 620-627. Walenta, W., Baurle, H.W. and Kessler, H.G. (1988). Einflug von Molkenproteinzusatzen auf die Strukturausbildung von Frischkasezubereitungen. DMZ Deutsche Molkereizeitung 18, 538-543. Walstra, P. (1993). The syneresis of curd, in, Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology. Vol. 1. General Aspects, Fox, P.E, ed., Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 141-191. Walstra, P. and Jennes, R. (1984). Dairy Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Zakrzewski, E., Stepaniak, k., Abrahamsen, R.K. and Sorhaug, T. (1991). Effect of thermization on the quality of Quarg. Int. Dairy J. 1,199-208. Zoon, P., van Vliet, T. and Walstra, P. (1989). Rheological properties of rennet-induced skim milk gels. 4. Effect of pH and NaC1. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 43, 17-34.
Acid- and Acid/Rennet-curd Cheeses Part B: Cottage Cheese N.Y. Farkye, Dairy Products Technology Center, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Cottage cheese is a soft, unripened, mild acid cheese with discrete curd particles of relatively uniform size. Creamed Cottage cheese is dry-curd Cottage cheese covered with a cream dressing. The specific origin of Cottage cheese is unknown. However, as the name implies, it was produced originally in homes (cottages) but industrial Cottage cheese production began in the USA in --1916 (Reidy and Hedrick, 1970). Cottage cheese is classified into different groups, subgroups, types, classes and styles (Table 1).
By definition, Cottage cheese and dry-curd Cottage cheese shall comply with the US Food and Drug Administration's Standards of Identity 21 CFR Part 122.128 for Cottage cheese or 21 CFR Part 133.129 for dry-curd Cottage cheese (see Table 2). Reducedfat, light and fat-free Cottage cheese or dry-curd Cottage cheese shall comply with 21 CFR Part 101.62 for nutrient claims for fat. Codex Alimentarius official standard (Codex Stan C-16) for Cottage cheese and creamed Cottage cheese (Codex Alimentarius, 1968) lists the raw material for manufacture as pasteurized bovine skim milk, and the following authorized ingredients: harmless lactic acid and aroma-producing bacteria, rennet or other suitable coagulating agent, CaC12 (maximum of 200mg/kg milk), NaC1 and water. Dairy ingredients allowed in cream dressing (creaming mixture) are: cream, skim milk, condensed milk, non-fat dry milk and dry milk protein. Other permitted ingredients in the cream dressing are: harmless lactic acid- or aroma-producing bacteria, chymosin or other suitable milk-clotting enzyme, NaC1, lactic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, glucono-8-1actone (maximum level, 10 g/kg), sodium caseinate, ammonium caseinate, calcium caseinate, potassium caseinate. In addition, the following stabilizing agents are permitted: carob bean gum, guar gum, calcium sulphate, carrageenan or its salts, furcelleran or its salts, gelatine, lecithin, alginic acid or its salt, propylene glycol ester of alginic acid, sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose. Permitted carriers for stabilizers are sugar, dextrose, corn syrup solids, dextrine, glycerine and 1,2-propylene glycol. The limitations for ingredient use are as follows: (1) the weight of solids (including caseinates) added singly or in combination should not exceed 3% (w/w) of the cream dressing mixture and (2) the stabilizing solids, including carrier shall not exceed 0.5% (w/w) of creaming mixture.
Cottage cheese is produced by acid coagulation of pasteurized skimmilk or reconstituted extra low-heat skimmilk powder (RSM). The minimum heat treatment given to skimmilk or RSM for Cottage cheese manufacture is the minimum allowable pasteurization temperature • time of 62.8 ~ • 30 min or 71.7 ~ • 15 s. In a survey of seven Cottage cheese plants in California, Rosenberg et al. (1994) found that the average milk pasteurization temperature used for manufacture is 74-75 ~ Excessive heat treatment of milk (i.e., higher pasteurization temperature and/or longer time) results in a soft coagulum from which it is difficult to expel whey. The skimmilk or RSM used for Cottage cheese manufacture must be of good microbial quality and have a high dry matter (DM) content to ensure good quality and yield of cheese. The differences in DM content of milk from different breeds influence the yield and quality of Cottage cheese. Cottage cheese curds made from Friesian skimmilk (8.7% DM) are more fragile than curds made from Jersey skimmilk (9.8% DM) (Mutzelburg et al., 1982). According to Mutzelburg etal. (1982), when the DM content of Friesian skimmilk was increased to at least 9%, by the addition of Na citrate (0.1%, w/w) or Na caseinate (0.25-0.55%, w/w), curd formation improved during Cottage cheese manufacture. Reconstituted extra low-heat skimmilk powder can be used for Cottage cheese manufacture immediately after reconstitution without holding (Flanagan et al., 1978; White and Ryan, 1983). Increasing DM (8-20%) in RSM increases the moisture-adjusted (80%) Cottage cheese yield by 17.1-31.2%. However, using RSM containing >10.5% DM is not economical because the
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 2: Major Cheese Groups ISBN: 0-1226-3653-8 Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
330
Cottage C h e e s e
Groups, types, classes and styles of Cottage cheese
Groups A B Sub-groups 1 2 Types I II III Classes 1 2 Style A B
Culture acidified Chemically acidified Normal shelf-life (14 days and over) Extended shelf-life (21 days and over) Dry-curd Cottage cheese Low-fat Cottage cheese Cottage cheese Unflavoured Flavoured (with nuts, fruit condiments) Small curd (0.635 cm) Large curd (0.953-1.27 cm)
additional yield advantage is offset by the extra cost of ingredients (White and Ryan, 1983), suggesting that 10.5% DM in skimmilk or RSM is optimal for Cottage cheesemaking. Also, cheese manufacturing time is increased when skimmilk containing >10.5% DM content is used because of its high buffering capacity. Emmons and Beckett (1984a) reported that it takes longer than 75 min (normal cooking time) to reduce the pH of skimmilk with a high DM content from 6.6 to 4.8 or lower when conventional bulk starter is used at a level of 5% (w/w). There are conflicting reports on the use of lactosehydrolysed skimmilk for Cottage cheese manufacture. Gyuricsek and Thompson (1976) reported that when >90% of the lactose in skimmilk is hydrolysed before Cottage cheesemaking, the manufacturing time is reduced by 135min because the starter bacteria ferment glucose better than lactose. The shortened manufacturing time results in reduced curd shattering and consequently increase in yields. However, Fedrick and Houliman (1981) found that the use of lactosehydrolysed skimmilk did not affect setting time, yield or quality of Cottage cheese.
The mode of setting (incubation) or acidifying milk for Cottage cheese manufacture depends on whether cultured or direct-acid Cottage cheese is being made. For cultured Cottage cheese, acidification is done by harmTable 2
Standards of Identity for Cottage cheese variants
Cheese type
Fat (%)
Moisture(%)
pH
Dry-curd Cottage cheese Cottage cheese
300 nm in diameter) is surrounded by an outer lining, 30-50 nm thick with a void space 50-80 nm wide that separates the lining and the core. Harwalkar and Kalab (1988) suggest that a pH of 5.2-5.5 is critical for the development of the core-and-lining structure because in this pH range, casein micelles have optimal voluminosity or hydrodynamic volume, a high percentage of non-sedimantable casein and little or no colloidal calcium phosphate. They suggest that the heat-induced interaction between [3-1actoglobulin and K-casein, enhanced by the presence of calcium ions, results in the development of filamentous appendages. Caseins, particularly [3-casein, which dissociate from the micelles during heat treatment, precipitate on the filamentous appendages to form a lining and leave an annular space between the casein core and the lining formed. Dissociation of caseins occurs on heating milk to high temperatures (Fox et al., 1967). The intensity of the core-and-lining structure in Queso Blanco increases with heat treatment of the cheese milk. The average diameter of casein particles in Queso Blanco made from milk coagulated at 62.8~ is 0.1 bLm compared to 0.5-5 b~m when coagulation is at 96-98 ~ (Kalab and Modler, 1985). Kalab et al. (1988) also observed coreand-lining structures in Paneer made from cow and buffalo milks.
Acid-heat Coagulated Cheeses
Queso Blanco made without rennet has a unique functionality- it has good slicing properties (Siapantas and Kosikowski, 1967) and resists melting when fried (Chandan et al., 1979). However, Queso Blanco made with rennet has excellent melting properties (Siapantas and Kosikowski, 1973). The small indistinguishable casein particles in Queso Blanco permits its use as an ingredient in the manufacture of cheese spreads free of grittiness (Modler et al., 1985, 1989). The texture, and hence the sliceability, of Queso Blanco is influenced by the moisture content of the cheese (Chandan etal., 1979) and the age of the cheese (Torres and Chandan, 1981b). Parnell-Clunies et al. (1985b,c) reported that the hardness of Queso Blanco increased linearly over time (17 days at 5 ~ but decreased with increasing moisture in the range 50-54%. Farkye et al. (1995) studied the textural properties of Queso Blanco made with acetic, citric or lactic acid and reported that texture profile analysis (TPA) hardness, fracturability, chewiness and gumminess were highest for cheese made with acetic acid and lowest for that made with lactic acid. They also found that TPA springiness and cohesiveness of Queso Blanco were independent of acid type, and that all the textural parameters except cohesiveness increased with age of cheese up to 7 weeks at 5 ~ Traditionally, Queso Blanco is consumed fresh because the nature of the processing conditions allows for very little biochemical changes during storage. However, Torres and Chandan (1981b) reported that lactobacilli or exogenous lipases can be added to the dry curd before salting and pressing to improve the flavour of the cheese during ripening (12 weeks at 10 ~ The rate of increase in non-protein nitrogen during the 12 weeks ripening period was slight (0.23%) but greater in cheese containing added lactobacilli than in cheese without (0.17%). Treatment with lipase increases the concentration of free fatty acids in cheese >300-fold. Major volatile compounds contributing to the flavour and aroma of Queso Blanco include acetaldehyde, acetone, ethyl, isopropyl and butyl alcohols and formic, acetic, propionic and butyric acids (Siapantas, 1967). Unlike most cheese varieties, the pH of Queso Blanco decreases from approximately 5.2 to 4.9 during ripening. The fermentation of residual lactose by heat-stable indigenous bacteria in milk that survive cheesemaking or by post-manufacture contaminating bacteria (Torres and Chandan, 1981b), or perhaps the dissociation of residual coagulating acid may account for the decrease in the pH of Queso Blanco during storage.
345
Information on the microbiological quality of Queso Blanco made in the US or Canada by methods described above is limited, even though poor keeping qualities of such cheeses made by different methods have been reported (Arispe and Westhoff, 1984a,b). In commercial Venezuelan Queso Blanco made without exogenous acids or starter bacteria, micro-organisms enumerated include Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringes, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lb. casei, yeasts and moulds (Arispe and Westhoff, 1984b). Those cheeses were made under poor sanitary conditions and had a pH > 5.3. The high heat-acid treatment of milk, together with the low pH of the cheese and the presence of undissociated coagulating acid prevent the growth of spoilage organisms during refrigerated storage of Queso Blanco made in North America. Glass et al. (1995) reported differences in the efficacy of different organic acids and a bacteriocin-type product in the control of L. monocytogenes in Queso Blanco-type cheese. Siapantas (1967) reported that storage of Queso Blanco at a high temperature (>26 ~ results in butyric acid fermentation due to the growth of spore-forming bacteria in the milk used for manufacture.
Ricotta is an unripened soft cheese that originated from Italy. In Latin American and the Hispanic communities in North America, Ricotta is known as Requeson. The USDA specifies three types of Ricotta cheese: 1. Whole milk R i c o t t a - manufactured from whole milk, and the finished product shall contain not more than 80.0% moisture and not less than 11.0% milk fat. 2. Part-skim Ricotta - manufactured from milk with a reduced fat content, and the finished product shall contain not more 80.0% moisture and less than 11.0% but not less than 6.0% milk fat. 3. Ricotta (Ricottone) from whey or s k i m m i l k manufactured from skimmilk, whey or a blend of these products and the finished product shall contain not more than 82.5% moisture and less than 1.0% milk fat. Whole milk or part-skim Ricotta is a soft creamy cheese and has a pleasant and slightly sweet or caramel flavour whereas Ricottone has a slightly sweet, bland flavour. Typically, Ricotta is made from whey containing
346
Acid-heat Coagulated Cheeses
5-20% whole milk, skimmilk or non-fat dry milk (NFDM; Shahani, 1979). However, to produce Ricotta with desirable curd handling characteristics, it is necessary to add at least 5 parts of whole milk to 95 parts of whey, or 1 part NFDM to 99 parts of whey (Shahani, 1979). Traditionally, the starting material used for the manufacture of Ricotta cheese is whey resulting from Mozzarella cheese production. At present, Ricotta can be made from almost any type of sweet whey, provided the initial titratable acidity of the whey is -6.0. The best initial titratable acidity of whey for Ricotta cheese manufacture is 0.13-0.14% lactic acid (True, 1973). The use of whey concentrates containing up to 36% DM as starting material for Ricotta cheese manufacture has been reported (Nilson and Streiff, 1978). In the traditional method, whey or whey and milk blends are heated to 40-45 ~ and NaC1 is added. The mixture is heated continuously in large open kettles to 80-85 ~ A slow heating rate produces a better coagulum than rapid heating (True, 1973). Then, a suitable food-grade acid is added to reduce the pH to 6.0, thereby inducing coagulation. The coagulated curds float to the surface and are scooped off and placed in perforated hoops to drain and cool. In industrial methods, the whey is first neutralized to pH >6.5 (6.9-7.1) with a 25% (w/v) solution of NaOH. pH manipulation minimizes protein aggregation and produces a more cohesive coagulum (Modler and Emmons, 1989b). The neutralized whey is heated to 65-70 ~ then, whole milk or skimmilk equal to 5-25% of the whey volume is added and heating of the whey/milk mixture is continued to 75-80 ~ Cream may be added at this stage. Next, NaC1 (0.5%, w/v) is added and heating continued to 85-95 ~ Alternately, CaC12 may be added. NaC1 dehydrates the whey proteins and has a destabilizing effect on bovine serum albumin. Similarly, calcium destabilizes the whey proteins. Then, dilute food-grade acetic or citric acid is added for coagulation and curd formation. Typically, --1.5% (v/v) of dilute (---3.85%) acetic acid is needed to clot the whey/milk mixture. The curds are left in the hot whey for about an hour to increase in firmness and enhance whey drainage. The curds, which float on the surface of the whey, are ladled off. Alternately, the whey may be drained from the bottom, leaving the curds in the vat or kettle. Optimal coagulation occurs at pH 5.6-5.8 to give maximum yield (Weatherup, 1986). Approximately 5 kg of fresh Ricotta is obtained from 100 kg whey to which 5 kg of whole milk has been added. True (1973) obtained 30-39 g Ricotta cheese from 750 ml of whey; the highest yield was from whey heated to - 8 8 ~
Table 1 cheese
Proximate composition of different types of Ricotta
Ricotta cheese varieties
Component Moisture (g/100 g) Fat (g/100 g) Protein (g/100 g) Carbohydrate (g/100 g) Ash (g/100 g) Energy (kcal/100 g)
Part-skim
Whey (Ricottone)
72 13 11 3
74.5 8 11.5 5
77 2.5 16 3.5
1 174
1 138
1.0 100
Whole milk
Kosikowski (1967) describes the following procedure for the manufacture of whole milk Ricotta. Whole milk is adjusted to pH 6.0 or titratable acidity of 0.30-0.31% lactic acid, preferably with lactic starter, before heating. During heating, NaC1 (1.86 g/kg milk) is added. Also, stabilizer (0.23 g ~ g milk) is added to prevent foaming of the milk during heating. When the temperature of the milk reaches "-76 ~ a wideblade spatula is passed through the milk to observe the initiation of curd formation. Heating is continued to 80 ~ The floating curd is left undisturbed for about 10 min. Then, the curd is moved gently away from the wall of the vat or kettle towards the centre. This is continued for about 15 min and the curd is ladled from the top. The remaining whey is subjected to a second precipitation by heating to 85 ~ and adding granular citric acid (0.12 g&g milk) to give a pH of 5.4. The curd is ladled off. The curds from the primary and secondary precipitations are cooled and packaged. The use of ultrafiltration techniques to improve the yield of Ricotta cheese has been demonstrated (Maubois and Kosikowski, 1978). Also, a continuous manufacturing process for whole milk Ricotta cheese, with yields of 14.45-15.11kg/100kg milk, was reported (Modler, 1984, 1988; Modler and Emmons, 1989b). The typical composition of whole milk and partskim Ricotta, and Ricottone are given in Table 1.
Shelf-Life of Ricotta Ricotta has a relatively short shelf-life- about 3 weeks if properly packaged and stored at 4 ~ or lower (True, 1973), although Kosikowski (1967) reported a shelf-life of 70 days for whole milk. Ricotta cheese is packaged under vacuum, gas flushed and stored at "--4 ~
Acid-heat Coagulated Cheeses
Arispe, I. and Westhoff, D. (1984a). Manufacture and quality of Venezuelan white cheese. J. Food Sci. 49, 1005-1010. Arispe, I. and Westhoff, D. (1984b). Venezuelan white cheese: composition and quality. J. Food Protect. 47, 27-35. Bringe, N.A. and Kinsella, J.E. (1990). Acidic coagulation of casein micelles: mechanisms inferred from spectrophotometric studies. J. Dairy Res. 57,365-375. Chandan, R.C. (1991). Cheeses made by direct acidification, in, Feta and Related Cheeses, Robinson, R.K. and Tamine, A.Y., eds, Ellis Horwood, New York. pp. 229-252. Chandan, R.C., Marin, H., Nakrani, K.R. and Zehner, M.D. (1979). Production and consumer acceptance of Latin American white cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 62, 691-696. Farkye, N.Y., Prasad, B.B., Rossi, R. and Noyes, O.R. (1995). Sensory and textural properties of Queso Blanco-type cheese influenced by acid type. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 1649-1656. Fox, K.K., Harper, M.K., Holsinger, V.H. and Pallansch, M.J. (1967). Effect of high-heat treatment on stability of calcium casein aggregates in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 50,443-450. Gastaldi, E., Laguade, A. and Tarodo de la Fuente (1996). Micellar transition state in casein between pH 5.5 and 5.0. J. Food Sci. 61, 59-64. Glass, K.A., Bhanu Prasad, B., Schlyter, J.M., Uljas, H.E., Farkye, N.Y. and Luchansky, J.B. (1995). Effects of acid type and Aha TM 2341 on Listeria monocytogenes in Queso Blanco type of cheese. J. Food Prot. 58, 737-741. Harwalkar, V.R. and Kalab, M. (1980). Milk gel structure. XI. Electron microscopy of glucono-8-1actone-induced skim milk gels. J. Texture Stud. 11, 35-49. Harwalkar, VR. and Kalab, M. (1981). Effect of acidulants and temperature on microstructure, firmness, and susceptibility to syneresis of skimmilk gels. Scanning Electron Microsc. III, 503-513. Harwalkar, V.R. and Kalab, M. (1988). The role of [3-1actoglobulin in the development of the core-and-lining structure of casein particles in acid-heat induced milk gels. Food Microstruct. 7, 173-179. Hill, A.R., Bullock, D.H. and Irvine, D.M. (1982). Manufacturing parameters of Queso Blanco made from milk and recombined milk. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 15, 47-53. Hirschl, R. and Kosikowski, EV. (1975). Manufacture of Queso Blanco using whey concentrates. J. Dairy Sci. 58, 793 (abstr.). Kalab, M. and Modler, H.W. (1985). Development of microstructure in a cream cheese based on Queso Blanco cheese. Food Microstruct. 4, 89-98. Kalab, M., Gupta, S.K., Desai, H.K. and Patil, G.R. (1988). Development of microstructure in raw, fried, and fried and cooked Paneer made from buffalo, cow and mixed milks. Food Microstruct. 7, 83-91. Kosikowski, EV. (1967). The making of Ricotta cheese. Proc. 4th Annual Marschall Invitational Italian Cheese Seminar, Madison, WI. pp. 1-7. Kosikowski, EV. (1982). Cheese and Fermented Milk Foods, 2nd edn, Edward Bros, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI.
347
Maubois, J.L. and Kosikowski, EV. (1978). Making Ricotta Cheese by ultrafiltration principles. J. Dairy Sci. 61, 881-884. Mistry, C.D., Singh, S. and Sharma, R.S. (1992). Physicochemical characteristics of Paneer from cow milk by altering salt balance. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 47, 23-27. Modler, H.W. (1984). Continuous Ricotta manufacture. Mod. Dairy 63 (4), 10-12. Modler, H.W. (1988). Development of a continuous process for the production of Ricotta cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 71, 2003-2009. Modler, H.W. and Emmons, D.B. (1989a). Production and yield of whole milk Ricotta manufacture by a continuous process. I. Materials and methods. Milchwissenschaft 44, 673-676. Modler, H.W. and Emmons, D.B. (1989b). Production and yield of whole milk Ricotta manufactured by a continuous process. II. Results and discussion. Milchwissenschaft 44, 753-757. Modler, H.W., Poste, L.M. and Butler, G. (1985). Sensory evaluation of an all-dairy fermented cream-type cheese produced by a new method. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 2835-2839. Modler, H.W., Yiu, S.H., Bollinger, U.K. and Kalab, M. (1989). Grittiness in a pasteurized cheese spread: a microscopic study. Food Microstruct. 8, 201-210. Nilson, K.M. and Streiff, P. (1978). Comparison of whey Ricotta cheese manufactured from whey and whey concentrates. Proc. 15th Marschall Invitation Cheese Seminar, Madison, WI. pp. 1-12. Parnell-Clunies, E.M., Irvine, D.M. and Bullock, D.H. (1985a). Heat treatment and homogenization of milk for Queso Blanco (Latin American white cheese) manufacture. Can. Inst. Food Sci Technol. J. 18, 133-136. Parnell-Clunies, E.M., Irvine, D.M. and Bullock, D.H. (1985b). Composition and yield studies for Queso Blanco made in pilot plants and commercial trials with dilute acidulant solutions. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 3095. Parnell-Clunies, E.M., Irvine, D.M. and Bullock, D.H. (1985c). Textural characteristics of Queso Blanco. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 789-793. Pyne, G.T. and McGann, T.C.A. (1960). The colloidal phosphate of milk. II. Influence of citrate. J. Dairy Res. 27, 9-17. Rao, K.V.S.S., Zanjpad, P.N. and Mathur, B.N. (1992). Paneer technology- a review. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 45 (6), 281-291. Sawyer, W.H. (1969). Complex between [3-1actoglobulin and K-casein: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1347-1355. Shahani, K.M. (1979). Newer techniques for making and utilization of Ricotta cheese. Proc. 1st Biennial Marschall International Cheese Conference, Madison, WI. pp. 77-87. Siapantas, L.G. (1967). Biochemical Changes in "Queso Blanco" Cheese during Storage at High Temperatures. IDM Potential for Developing Countries. PhD Thesis, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Siapantas, L.A. and Kosikowski, EV. (1965). Acetic acid preparation phenomenon of whole milk for Queso Blanco cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 48, 764 (abstr.). Siapantas, L.G. and Kosikowski, EV. (1967). Properties of Latin American white cheese influenced by glacial acetic acid. J. Dairy Sci. 50, 1589.
348
Acid-heat Coagulated Cheeses
Siapantas, L.G. and Kosikowski, EV. (1973). The chemical mode of action of four acids and milk acidity in the manufacture of Queso Blanco. J. Dairy Sci. 56, 631. Torres, N. and Chandan, R.C. (1981a). Latin American white cheese: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 64, 552-559. Torres, N. and Chandan, R.C. (1981b). Flavor and texture development in Latin American white cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 64, 2161-2169. True, L.C. (1973). Effect of various processing conditions on the yield of whey Ricotta cheese. Proc. l Oth Marschall Invitational Cheese Seminar, Madison, WI. pp. 1-11.
United States Department of Agriculture (1978). Cheese Varieties and Descriptions. Agric. Handbook 54. Washington, DC. pp. 99-100. Vishweshwaraiah, L. and Anantakrishnan, C.P. (1985). A study on technological aspects of preparing Paneer from cow's milk. AsianJ. Dairy Res. 4 (3), 171-176. Weatherup, W. (1986). The effect of processing variables on the yield and quality of Ricotta. Dairy Ind. Int. 5 (8), 41-45. Weigold, G.W. (1958). Development of a factory method for the manufacture of Queso Del Pias. Milk Prod. J. 49 (10), 16-17, 25.
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products T.P. Guinee, Dairy Products Research Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland M. Cari~, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, Serbia and Montenegro M. Kah~b, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Food Research Program, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
The products in this group differ from natural cheeses in that they are not made directly from milk (or dehydrated milk), but rather from various ingredients such as skim milk, natural cheese, water, butter oil, casein, caseinates, other dairy ingredients, vegetable oils, vegetable proteins and/or minor ingredients. The two main categories, namely pasteurized processed cheese products (PCPs) and analogue cheese products (ACPs), may be subdivided further depending on the composition and the types and levels of ingredients used (Fig. 1). The individual categories will be discussed separately below.
Introduction
Pasteurized PCPs are cheese-based foods produced by comminuting, melting and emulsifying into a smooth homogeneous molten blend, one or more natural cheeses and optional ingredients using heat, mechanical shear and (usually) emulsifying salts (ES). Optional ingredients permitted depend on the product type, i.e., whether processed cheese, processed cheese food (PCF) or processed cheese spread (PCS), and include dairy ingredients, vegetables, meats, stabilisers, ES, flavours, colours, preservatives and water (Tables 1 and 2). Cheese, as an ingredient of PCPs, ranges from a minimum of 51% in pasteurized PCSs and PCFs to "-095% in pasteurized processed cheese (Code of Federal Regulations, 1986; Fox et al., 1996). Attempts to increase the shelf-life of cheese during the early twentieth century were inspired by the possibility of increased cheese trade, via the production of more stable transportable products, and by the existence of heated cheese dishes such as Swiss Fondue, Welsh Rarebit and Kochktise. Many of the early approaches
were unsuccessful; the heat-treated cheeses were unstable, undergoing oiling-off and moisture-exudation during cooling and storage. In 1911, Swiss workers, Walter Gerber and Fritz Stettler, produced a stable heat-treated Emmental cheese, known as Schachtelk~ise, by the addition of a 'melting salt', sodium citrate, to the comminuted cheese before processing (i.e., heating and shearing; Meyer, 1973). Subsequently, it was found that other cheeses (e.g., Cheddar) could be also processed to form stable products by the addition of other 'melting salts' (e.g., sodium phosphates) or blends of different ES. The 'melting salts' were gradually referred to as ES when their function became known, i.e., mediation of the processes of protein hydration and emulsification of free fat during processing. Initial successes were followed by numerous patents for different melting salt blends and later for the inclusion of food ingredients other than cheese. Processed cheese products are used in many applications, in both the raw and the heated forms. The suitability for particular applications depends primarily on the textural and the flavour characteristics of the unheated cheese and the cooking properties of the heated cheese. In the unheated form, it may be used as a table product with a spectrum of consistencies ranging from firm, elastic and sliceable to creamy, smooth and spreadable. The variations in consistency make it suitable for a range of uses, e.g., substitute for natural sliceable or shredded cheese (e.g., on bread, crackers or in sandwiches), table spread, sauces and dips. Processed cheese products are also used as an ingredient in several cookery applications, e.g., as slices in burgers, in toasted sandwiches, pasta dishes, au-gratin sauces or cordon-bleu poultry products. Processed cheese products may be also be dried, as cheese powders, which are then dry-blended with other ingredients in the preparation of formulated foods such as dry
Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Third edition - Volume 2: Major Cheese Groups ISBN: 0-1226-3653-8 Set ISBN: 0-1226-3651-1
Copyright 9 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
350
P a s t e u r i z e d P r o c e s s e d C h e e s e and S u b s t i t u t e / I m i t a t i o n C h e e s e P r o d u c t s
Pasteurized processed and analogue cheese products
Pasteurized process cheese products
Analogue cheese products
I
9 manufactured by blending, heating and shearing mixtures of ingredients, mainly of dairy origin 9 natural cheese must be >51% (w/w) of the final product
Categories - Processed cheese - Processed cheese food - Processed cheese spread - Blended cheese -Blended cheese spread
9 manufactured by blending, heating and shearing mixtures of ingredients of dairy and/or vegetable origin 9 not necessary to include natural cheese 9 natural cheese may be added at a low level (e.g., 5% ) to impart cheesy flavour or to comply with a particular customer specification
Categories - Dairy analogue - Part-dairy analogue - Non-dairy analogue
Generalized classification scheme for pasteurized processed and analogue cheese products; the analogue cheeses may be either substituted or imitated depending on the nutritional equivalence compared to natural cheese (Analogue cheese products, ACPs).
soup or sauce mixes, ready-prepared meals, snack coatings (see 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). The production of pasteurized processed cheese in different countries is shown in Table 3. Global production of PCPs, based on available information, is estimated to be "--2.0 million tonnes/annum, which is equivalent to ---13% of natural cheese production. Production in the EU15 increased steadily at a rate of ---1% per annum during the period 1996-2000, i.e., at a rate lower than that for natural cheese (1.6%) over the same period, but has increased by 2.7% per annum for the 1999-2000 period (ZMP, 2001). Factors contributing to the continued growth of PCPs include: 9 Their versatility as foods which offer wide variety in flavour, texture (e.g., elasticity, firmness, spreadability, sliceability), cooking attributes (e.g., degrees of flowability, browning, viscosity), size and shape of the final product and overall consumer appeal made possible by differences in formulation and processing conditions, condiment addition and packaging technology (Mann, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1978a,b, 1981, 1986, 1987, 1990, 1993, 1997; Price and Bush, 197ara,b; Abou-E1-Nour, 2001; Subak and Petranin, 2001).
9 Their popularity with children of different ages owing to their safe ingestable consistency (for infants), mild flavours and their packaging (colour, caricatures, strength, ease of opening, size) and shape (e.g., triangles, fingers, cartoon characters) which is generally attractive and convenient for lunch boxes. 9 Their nutritive value (e.g., especially as a source of calcium and protein) as a food for children. 9 Their ability to meet special dietary needs if fortified with vitamins and minerals (Zhang and Mahoney, 1991; Sukhinina et al., 1997), which is technologically easy in the manufacture of PCPs. 9 Their adaptability as an ingredient with properties customized to the needs of several sectors of the food formulation and assembly industries (e.g., manufacturers of cheese powders, cheese-flavoured coated snacks, soups, cheese-meat products, prepared meals). 9 Their convenience of use in the culinary and food service sectors, especially the fast food trade, and the home because of their excellent preservation (stability), consistent tailor-made functionality (e.g., cooking properties), convenient portion size and packaging (e.g., as slices for the beef burger and sandwiches trade).
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
351
Optional ingredients permitted in pasteurized processed cheese productsa,b
Ingredient type
Main function~effect
Examples
9 Standardization of composition 9 Contributes to flavour, texture and cooking characteristics 9 Standardization of composition 9 Assist in 'creaming' (thickening of blend during manufacture) and formation of product 9 Contribute to texture and rheological (e.g., fracturability, hardness) and cooking properties 9 Low-cost filler; may affect texture
Cream, anhydrous milk fat, dehydrated cream, butter
Dairy Ingredients Milk fat
Milk proteins
Lactose Cheese base
Stabilizers
Acidifying agents Flavourings
Flavour enhancers Condiments Sweetening agents Colours Preservatives
9 Substitute for young cheese 9 Similar in behaviour to milk proteins, it contributes to thickening during manufacture, texture and cooking properties 9 Assist the formation of a physico-chemically stable product 9 Impart desired texture and cooking characteristics 9 Assist control of the pH of final product 9 Impart flavour to processed cheese foods and spreads, especially where much young cheese, cheese base, or milk proteins are used 9 Accentuate flavour 9 Affect appearance, flavour and texture, and product differentiation 9 Increase sweetness, especially in products targeted to young children 9 Impart desired colour 9 Retard mould growth; prolong shelf-life
Casein, caseinates, whey proteins, milk protein concentrates (ultrafiltered milk and microfiltered milk preparations), co-precipitates, skim milk powder Whey powder, skim milk powder, whey permeate powder Typically, high dry-matter milk solids (=60%, w/w) prepared by evaporation of milk ultrafiltrates to which starter culture and rennet have been added Emulsifying salts: sodium phosphates and sodium citrates Hydrocolloids: carrob bean gum, guar gum, xanthan gum, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, carageenan Food-grade organic acids, e.g., lactic, acetic, citric, phosphoric Enzyme-modified cheese, starter distillate, wood smoke extracts, spices NaCI, yeast extract Sterile preparations of meat, fish, vegetables, nuts and/or fruits Sucrose, dextrose, corn syrup, hydrolysed lactose Annato, paprika, artificial colours Nisin, potassium sorbate, Ca- or Na- propionate
a The ingredients permitted depend on product type, category, regulations in the region of manufacture. b The effects of different ingredient types are discussed in detail in 'Influence of various parameters on the consistency and cooking characteristics of PCPs and ACPs' and 'Properties of ES important in cheese processing'.
9 Low cost relative to natural cheese due to the incorporation of low-grade natural cheese, off-cuts and cheaper non-cheese milk solids (e.g., skim milk powder, whey, casein and caseinates). Casein and fat in cheese are generally more expensive, on a weight basis, than casein and fat in the form of ingredients such as casein powders and butter oil. 9 Relatively long shelf-life, good physico-chemical stability (e.g., compared to natural cheeses in which fat and/or moisture separation sometimes occur on prolonged storage) and absence of waste (e.g., compared to natural cheeses with rind or surface mould or smear). This makes them easy to use in the food service and food formulation assembly sectors. 9 The developments in manufacturing technology, emulsifying salt blends and functional dairy ingredients which facilitate the manufacture of consistent quality products with customized quality attributes, shape, size and appearance (e.g., processed cheese
slices with holes similar to eye cheeses; Polkowski, 2002). Classification of PCPs
There are various types of PCPs, with standards of identity (relating to composition and levels and types of permitted ingredients) that vary somewhat from country to country. Hence, in the UK there are two categories of PCPs, namely processed cheese and cheese spread (as specified by the Cheese and Cream Regulations, 1995, SI 1995/3240, HMSO, London) whereas in Germany there are four categories, viz., Schmelzk/~se (processed cheese), Schmelzk~isezubereitung (processed cheese preparation), Kasezubereitung (cheese preparation) and K/isekomposition (cheese composition), as detailed in the Deutsche K/iseverordnung of 12 November 1990. Currently, the IDF, under the auspices of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a
352
Pasteurized Processed-Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
Ingredients and composition specifications of different categories of pasteurized (processed) cheese productsa, b
Compositional specifications
Product category
Permitted ingredients
Pasteurized blended cheese
Cheese; cream, anhydrous milk fat, dehydrated cream (in quantities such that the fat derived from them is less than 5%, w/w, in finished product); water; salt, food-grade colours, spices and flavourings (other than those which simulate the flavour of cheese, and wood smoke extracts); mould inhibitors (sorbic acid, potassium/sodium sorbate at levels _ 1.5%, w/w; cf., Briozzo et al., 1983; Tanaka et al., 1986; Leistner and Russell, 1991; Eckner et al., 1994; Rajkowski et al., 1994; Ter Steeg et al., 1995) without affecting the product quality otherwise. 9 Using ES with bacteriostatic properties. 9 Good manufacturing practice, minimization of manual handling of product, avoiding post-processing contamination and reducing storage temperature (Ter Steeg et al., 1995; Palmas et al., 1999).
Flavour effects. It is generally recognized that sodium citrates impart a 'clean' flavour while phosphates may impart off-flavours described as soapy (especially orthophosphates), chemical or salty (Meyer, 1973; Gupta et al., 1984). Pyrophosphates may cause bitterness if added at a level of 2%, w/w (Templeton and Sommer, 1936); potassium citrates also tend to cause bitterness (Templeton and Sommer, 1936; Meyer, 1973).
Bacterial spoilage can be effectively eliminated by the use of UHT processing (sterilization), which destroys heat-resistant spores such as Cl. butyricum, Cl. tyrobutyricum, Cl. sporogenes, in combination with hot filling at 85-95 ~ to eliminate post-pasteurization contamination (Sch~r and Bosset, 2002).
Influence of various parameters on the consistency and cooking characteristics of PCPs and ACPs
Processed cheese products are consumed directly as table products or as ingredients in certain cooking applications (Guinee, 2002a). As a table product, different PCPs offer a spectrum of consistencies ranging from firm, elastic and sliceable to creamy, smooth and spreadable. The variation in consistency makes PCPs suitable for a range of uses, e.g., substitute for natural sliceable or shredded cheese (e.g., on bread, crackers or sandwiches), table spread, sauces or dips. When consumed as table products, PCPs are subjected to various stresses and strains in the form of shearing (e.g., during spreading, mastication), cutting (e.g., during slicing and ingestion) or compression (e.g., during chewing). The rheological properties of the PCPs characterize its response (e.g., degree of spread,
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
fracture, crumbling, springiness) to the applied stresses or strains (see 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1) and have a major impact on the textural and sensory characteristics (see 'Sensory Character of Cheese and its Evaluation', Volume 1). Processed cheese products are also used as an ingredient in several cookery applications, e.g., as slices in burgers, toasted sandwiches, pasta dishes, au gratin sauces and cordon-bleu poultry. A key aspect of the cooking performance of cheese is its heat-induced functionality, which is a composite of different attributes, including softening (melting), stretchability, flowability, apparent viscosity and tendency to brown (see 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). Hence, the textural properties of the unheated PCP and cooking characteristics of the heated product are major factors affecting quality. Consequently, numerous investigations have been undertaken on the effects of different factors on the rheological characteristics of PCPs. Although some discrepancies exist between studies, probably as a consequence of inter-study differences in factors other than that being investigated (e.g., formulation and processing conditions), definite trends are evident. The quality of PCPs is influenced by many factors, including: the type and level of ES, the composition and degree of maturity of the natural cheese used, the type and level of optional ingredients, the processing conditions and the interactions between the different factors. These are summarized in Table 6 and are discussed briefly below.
Processing time Processing conditions can vary markedly. As discussed in 'Principles of manufacture of PCPs', the heat and shear applied during processing contribute to hydration of the para-casein and other ingredients and to emulsification of free fat/oil. They do this by aiding: 9 the mixing and the uniform distribution of all ingredients throughout the blend; 9 the dissolution of the ES and their interaction with the para-casein (in the cheese) or casein aggregates (as in added milk-protein ingredients such as milk powders, caseinates, caseins); 9 destruction of the structure of the natural cheese being processed (by promoting aggregation and dehydration of the para-casein matrix and by destruction of the milk fat globule membrane in the natural cheese); 9 dispersion of free (non-globular) fat/oil and moisture; 9 transformation of the structure, e.g., from a paracasein gel with occluded fat globules and moisture (as in cheese), or from a protein aggregate/precipitate
371
in the case of added milk protein ingredients, to a concentrated o/w emulsion. Increasing processing time and shear (speed of mixing) is generally accompanied by an increase in the DE, as reflected by an increase in the number, and reduction in the mean diameter, of the emulsified fat globules (Rayan et al., 1980; Kimura et al., 1986; Tatsumi et al., 1989). The increases in casein hydration and DE result in a progressive thickening of PCPs with holding time at a temperature in the range 70-90 ~ (cf. Swiatek, 1964; Rayan et al., 1980; Kalab et al., 1987). The thickening, referred to as creaming or creaming effect in the industry, may be attributed to the ongoing interaction of the ES with the casein and the consequent increases in para-casein hydration and DEE. Creaming is desirable, especially in high-moisture PCS, as it imparts the desired viscous consistency to the molten blend for filling/packing (which prevents splashing) and gives a thick, creamy-bodied final product; in such products, the lack of an adequate creaming gives a thin runny consistency. However, extending the holding time (e.g., due to a delay or stoppage of packaging lines) of the molten product at 70-90 ~ can result in a defect known as over-creaming. In PCPs, over-creaming manifests itself as the development of a short, stiff, heavy, pudding-like consistency and dull appearance; this development may not become obvious until the product has cooled. In block PCPs and slices, it is reflected by the appearance of an 'orangepeel'-like surface and development of an over-firm and heavy pudding-like (coarse) structure which leaks free moisture and exudes beads of free oil (through the 'surface dimples'), especially on cooling. Over-creaming is highly undesirable in practice as it creates problems in pumping/filling (e.g., clogging of filling heads, excessive stand-up in packages) of the product and causes a deterioration in the end product quality, e.g., loss of spreadability, loss of surface sheen, non-uniform greasy appearance (in slices/blocks), loss of cooking properties. In experimental studies, increasing the processing time from 0 to 40 min at 70-82 ~ resulted in progressive increases in the elasticity and the firmness of the unheated PCPs and a decrease in the flowability of the melted PCPs, to an extent dependent on the ES type (Rayan et al., 1980; Harvey et al., 1982; Tatsumi et al., 1991). In contrast to these results, Swenson et al. (2000) found that increasing the processing time at 75 ~ from 0 to 20 min resulted in a decrease in firmness and an increase in the flowability of fat-free PCPs. These results may suggest the absence of a creaming process in the fat-free PCPs and highlight the importance of fat content and degree of fat emulsification to the creaming process.
372
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
General effects of various parameters on the textural characteristics and heat-induced flowability of pasteurized processed cheese productsa,b,c,d,e,f,g
Firmness
Elasticity
Spreadability
Heat-induced flowability
t 4,
f 4,
NA NA
f 4,
4, f
4, 1'
4, f
4, f
f f t
t t NA
4, 4, NA
4, 4, 4,
NA NA NA t NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA t
4, 4, 4, 4, t NA
4, 4,
4, 4,
t t
NA t
t t
t t
~ ~
,~
Formulation Emulsifying salt concentration Increasing level in the range 0.0-0.5%, w/w Increasing level in the range 0.5-3.0%, w/w Cheese Increasing degree of proteolysis Increasing content of intact casein Substitution of rennet-curd cheese by: Reworked processed cheese Cheese base Acid-heat coagulated cheeses Dairy ingredients Whey proteins Total milk proteins Milk ultrafiltrates Calcium co-precipitate Calcium caseinate Skim milk powder
Composition of PCP Increasing moisture content Increasing pH
Processing conditions Increasing temperature Holding time at maximum temperature
a Modified from Guinee (2002a). b The general effects of the different parameters, as summarized from a review of the published literature, are presented. However, the precise effects of changing any parameter may depend on the particular formulation, processing conditions and the effects of their interaction. c NA, data not available, data limited, or conflicting data from which no general trends emerge. d Arrows, magnitude of factor (e.g., firmness) increases 1' or decreases ~. e Rework refers to pasteurized processed cheese product that is not packaged for sale; it is obtained from the 'left-overs' in cookers and filling machines, damaged packs and batches that have 'over-creamed' (thickened) and are too viscous to pump or fill. f Cheese base refers to milk ultrafiltrate which is diafiltered, inoculated with starter culture (and sometimes with rennet also) until the pH reaches ---5.2-5.8, pasteurized and concentrated to a dry matter content of - 6 0 % , w/w. g See text for more detail on effects ('Blend ingredients: cheese base (CB), ultrafiltered milk retentate (UFMR), cheeses from high heat-treated milks and whey proteins').
Several factors may contribute to over-creaming. Prolonged holding at a high temperature is conducive to aggregation and dehydration of para-casein. Hence, Csok (1982) reported that on holding a cooked processed cheese at 95 ~ the bound water increased to a maximum (e.g., at - 1 5 min) and decreased thereafter (Fig. 14). The initial increase may be attributed to increased solution of the ES (not fully solubilized at the end of the heating step) and calcium sequestration, while the eventual decrease may reflect aggregation of the paracaseinate on prolonged holding at the high temperature. In agreement with the above hypothesis of casein dehydration and aggregation, Bowland (1997), using image analysis of light micrographs, concluded that the level of protein incorporated into the matrix of PCP
increased with creaming time (holding time at the cooking temperature). Moreover, Tatsumi et al. (1991) reported that the level of water-insoluble N in the PCP increased with holding time at 80 ~ and that there was a significant inverse relationship between the holding time and the flowability of the cooked PCP. The increased degree of protein aggregation is consistent with the increase in firmness and elasticity that occurs with processing time (Rayanet al., 1980). Moreover, microstructural analyses of a processed cheese food (PCF) showed that the number and the area of electron-dense zones in a very firm product, cooked to 85 ~ and held for 5 h, was markedly higher than in the control, which was cooled after 3 min at 85 ~ (Kalab et al., 1987). The electron-dense zones may correspond to regions of
Pasteurized P r o c e s s e d C h e e s e and Substitute/Imitation C h e e s e P r o d u c t s
1.65 '7" c O c
.g1.35 m O u')
if) ID t-O
1.05
-O U) if) C) O
0.75 . cm (1) .4-.,
0.45 0
10 20 Holding time, min
30
Changes in the level free water (A) and total bound water (A) in pasteurized processed cheese as a function of processing time at 95 ~ (redrawn from Csok, 1982).
strand overlap and/or reflect areas with a relatively high degree of aggregation and fusion of the paracaseinate particles. The release of moisture and free oil during over-creaming of block PCPs also suggests that the process coincides with the onset of protein dehydration, emulsion destabilization and phase inversion. It is noteworthy that at a micro-structural level, clumping and coalescence of fat globules was evident in the PCF held for 5 h at 85 ~ but was absent, or markedly less, in fresh PCF held for 3 min at 82 ~ (Kal~ib et al., 1987). Another factor contributing to the over-creaming with time is the increase in the degree of fat emulsification (Rayan et al., 1980; Kalab et al., 1987). For a given protein-to-fat ratio in PCPs, increasing the DE leads to an increase in the surface area-to-volume ratio of the emulsified fat globules, which may be considered to behave as structure-building pseudo-protein particles. These particles are expected to increase the firmness of the PCP (see 'Micro-structure of PCPs and ACPs'). This hypothesis concurs with the positive correlation between the DEE and the firmness or elasticity, and the inverse relationship between the DE and the flowability of PCPs (Rayan et al., 1980; Cari~ et al., 1985; Savello et al., 1989). While increasing the DE beyond the critical emulsification point (where all the 'available' protein in the system is not sufficient to cover the available fat surface) maximizes the surface area of emulsified fat particles, it may also lead to free fat separation, especially in high-fat PCPs.
373
Processing temperature and shear According to Meyer (1973), processing at a temperature >95 ~ results in a decrease in product firmness. This coincides with observations in practice where UHT treatment, as in continuous processing, frequently gives PCPs which are more fluid than those processed at a lower temperature. The effect of temperatures >95 ~ may be attributable to thermal hydrolysis of polyphosphate ES, a consequent reduction in paracasein hydration and DE, and/or an increase in the rapidity of, and in the degree of, thermal-induced para-casein aggregation (which would reduce the extent of hydration and viscosity). However, tee et al. (1981) observed a positive relationship between the firmness of processed Emmental and the processing temperature in the range 80-140 ~ The effects of increased processing temperature are less clear when whey proteins are present in the PC blend. These undergo thermal denaturation and complex with para-K-casein at the high processing temperature (Jelen and Rattray, 1995; Singh, 1995). This denaturation may in turn lead to aggregation/pseudo-gelation on cooling the formed PCP (Doi et al., 1983a,b, 1985) to an extent which would be expected to increase with processing temperature. In this case, while a thin consistency may be observed in the kettle, the product may firm up more than usual on cooling. In contrast to Lee et al. (1981), Swenson et al. (2000) found that increasing the processing temperature from 70 to 90~ gave a significant increase in flowability and decrease in the spreadability of fatfree PCP; the firmness was highest at 70~ and lowest at 80 ~ Blend ingredients: ES Numerous studies have compared the effects of different ES blends on the texture and cooking properties of PCPs and ACPs (Templeton and Sommer, 1936; Swiatek, 1964; Thomas etal., 1980; Harvey etal., 1982; Gupta et al., 1984; Cavalier-Salou and Cheftel, 1991; Sutheerawattananonda and Bastian, 1998; Swenson et al., 2000; Abdel-Hamid et al., 2000a,b). Discrepancies between the various results may be due to inter-study differences in cheese (type, age and composition), blend pH, quantity of ES, processing conditions, moisture content and other compositional parameters and assessment methodology. However, general trends emerge showing that orthophosphates, citrates and sodium aluminium phosphates give relatively soft processed cheeses, which generally undergo a slight oiling-off ('sweating') on heating and have desirable melting properties (i.e., good flowability, moistness and surface sheen). In contrast, condensed phosphates generally give harder processed cheeses,
374
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
which show little, or no, oiling-off on heating and have poor melting properties (little or no flow, skin formation and crusting, dull and dry surface appearance). Overall, the flowability and oiling-off on cooking of PCPs or ACPs made with the different ES show the following general trend: sodium aluminium phosphate trisodium citrate (slightly) > disodium orthophosphate > >sodium tripolyphosphates ~ tetrasodium pyrophosphates > higher chain sodium polyphosphates. Generally, the opposite effect is observed with firmness. The above trends reflect the greater calcium sequestration and hydration effects of the condensed phosphates (Table 5) which affords them better emulsification and hence structural-forming properties. It is noteworthy that the DE is positively correlated with firmness and elasticity of the unheated PCP or ACP and inversely correlated with flowability of the heated products (Rayan et al., 1980). In contrast to the above, Lazaridis and Rosenau (1980) noted the following trend for the effect of ES on the flowability of a melted PCP made from a chemically-acidified curd (50%, w/w, moisture; pH 5.5): Na3PO4 > Na2HPO4 > trisodium citrate > sodium aluminium phosphate (kasal). This trend was probably due to the very low calcium sequestering ability of the latter two ES at pH 5.5 (see 'Characteristics of different ES in the manufacture of PCPs and ACPs'). Blend ingredients: cheese As cheese is a major blend constituent in PCPs, it is expected that both the cheese type and the degree of maturity would have major effects on the texture, flavour and cooking characteristics of the final product. The results of the few published studies, the authors' experience and the undocumented evidence from experienced manufacturers suggest that the following are important criteria: type (variety), composition (e.g., contents of moisture, fat, protein and Ca; pH; Thomas et al., 1980; Shimp, 1985; Salam, 1988; Marshall, 1990), age and level of proteolysis (Sood, and Kosikowski, 1979; Thomas et al., 1980; Lazaridis et al., 1981; Mahoney et al., 1982) and flavour. Proteolysis is inversely related to the level of intact casein (Fenelon and Guinee, 2000; Feeney et al., 2001; Guinee et a/.,2001). The pH, intact casein content and calcium-to-casein ratio are expected to influence the degree of casein hydration during processing, and in turn the DE, degree of casein aggregation and elasticity of the final product. However, there is very little direct experimental evidence to clearly demonstrate relationships between the various attributes of PCPs and the characteristics of the unheated cheese. Harvey et al. (1982) found that the flowability of heated processed Cheddar increased
markedly (from 0.5- to 2-fold) with age (from 3 to 6 months) of the Cheddar cheese used, the effect becoming more pronounced as the processing time of the PCP increased; no data on proteolysis were presented. Arnott etal. (1957) found no relationships between the levels of fat, moisture, pH or the level of proteolysis (measured by tyrosine content) in commercial Cheddar cheeses of different age (0-340 day) and the meltability (flowability) of the resultant PCPs. Variability in the flowability of the PCPs was attributed to the interactive effects of the different cheese characteristics. Surprisingly, Holsinger et al. (1987) reported that the melt index of processed Cheddar decreased as the proportion of mature (135-278 days) to young (90 days) Cheddar (stored at - 1 7 . 8 ~ increased from 100:0 through to 0:100. While few experimental details were given, the results of the latter study suggest an increased creaming reaction as the proportion of mature Cheddar increased. Lazaridis et al. (1981) investigated the effect of increasing the level of proteolysis in a pasteurized processed model chemically-acidified curd system by treating the processed curd (varying conditions: 40-55 ~ pH 5.5-9.0) with a proteinase from Aspergillus oryzae. In contrast to the studies cited earlier, there was a strong positive relationship ( r = 0.96) between the flowability and the extent of proteolysis (non-protein N). Excessive proteolysis was, however, associated with textural defects, including overshortness, faulty body and graininess. In a subsequent study (Mahoney et al., 1982), the same group found that optimal flowability of the processed chemicallyacidified curd was obtained when the proteolysis products were in the molecular mass range 10-25 kDa; smaller peptide sizes ( < 1 0 kDa) gave an excessively soft PCP which overflowed on cooking. In model experiments with processed Gouda, Ito et al. (1976) found an inverse relationship between the age (and hence level of proteolysis) and its emulsifying capacity (defined as ml of added oil absorbed per gram of cheese protein). A lower DE, due to greater proteolysis, would be expected to reduce the contribution of emulsified fat globules to structure building and the creaming effect, favour more oil-release during melting, and improve the flowability of the melted PCP (cf. Rudan and Barbano, 1998; Guinee et al., 2000b). Thus, in the studies of Lazaridis et al. (1981) and Mahoney et al. (1982), a decrease in the DE may explain the increase in flowability of the melted PCPs as the level of proteolysis in the raw cheese increased. Blend ingredients: rework Rework refers to a PCP which, for various reasons, is not packaged but instead is stored (refrigerated at a low
Pasteurized P r o c e s s e d C h e e s e and Substitute/Imitation C h e e s e Products
temperature or frozen) and reused (re-processed/ reworked) as a blend ingredient in later batches of PCP. It is obtained from left-overs in the cooking/filling machines, damaged packs and batches, which are overcreamed or are too viscous to pump. Meyer (1973) identified three types of rework: (A) that made from young cheese, quickly processed and long in structure; (B) that with a typical creamed character (i.e., processed cheese with texture characteristics considered normal for the product type) and (C) over-creamed product with a brittle structure. 'Hot melt', a North-American term, is a type of PC rework, which is the hot 'hardened' PCP that is removed from the packing pipelines following a plant breakdown, especially during continuous processing operations (Kal~ib et al., 1987). Microscopical examination of 'hot melt', which may be considered as an overcreamed rework, revealed the presence of dark areas (Fig. 15) that developed to a degree depending on the extent of heating and the melting salt used (Kal~ib et al., 1987). The dark areas represent regions where the protein absorbed an increased concentration of osmium during fixation. Klostermeyer and Buchheim (1988) reported that the protein matrix of processed cheese heated at 140 ~ contained areas of compacted protein as revealed by a freeze-fracturing technique followed by replication with platinum and carbon. It is probable that the areas of compacted protein observed in the study of Klostermeyer and Buchheim (1988) correspond to the osmiophilic dark areas reported by Kalab et al. (1987). Klostermeyer and Buchheim (1988) also observed that the dimensions of areas of relatively low protein concentration in the protein matrix of PCP decreased as the creaming effect increased: 1-2 b~m in diameter with no creaming (melting time, 4 min), - 0 . 5 p~m with mild creaming (melting time,
Scanning electron micrograph of a processed cheese food showing the presence of an electron-dense area (black area shown by arrow) that developed after holding the product for an extended time (5 h) at 82 ~ Bar corresponds to 0.2 i~m (adapted from Kalab et aL, 1987).
375
6 min) and completely absent at optimal creaming (melting time, 9 min), resulting in a uniform protein matrix. Rework that is free of crystals can sometimes be useful for initiating, or enhancing, the creaming effect in blends that are slow to thicken during processing. The recommended usage levels of rework types A, B and C are 1-2%, w/w, 2.0-30%, w/w and 0.0-1.0%, w/w (maximum), respectively (Meyer, 1973). Type A rework is particularly useful to impart creaming to PCS blends with a high proportion of mature (e.g., intact casein level, "--70% total) or very mature (e.g., low intact casein level, , 09
o o
800
600
09
> t-"
400
(1) Q.
200
2P were used as ES. The results of studies to date suggest that pH probably exerts its influence on the rheology and texture of PCPs and ACPs via its effects on protein-protein interactions and casein hydration, and on the calcium sequestering ability of the ES (Marchesseau et al., 1997; Cavalier-Salou, 1991; cf., 'The role of ES in the formation of a physico-
chemically stable product' and 'Characteristics of different ES in the manufacture of PCPs and ACPs'). However, further studies are required to elucidate the direct effect of pH.
Stabilizers (binding agents) and hydrocolloids Stabilizers, which include carob bean gum, guar gum, carageenan, sodium alginate, gum karaya, pectins and carboxy methylcellulose, are permitted in PCS at a maximum level of 0.8%, w/w (Code of Federal Regulations, 1986). These products stabilize by virtue of their waterbinding and gelation capacities (Phillips et al., 1985). In cheese processing, they are normally used at a level of 0.1-0.3%, w/w, to firm up the structure in instances of high water content or low creaming action (thin consistency) due to, for example, the use of over-ripe cheese or an unsuitable ES blend. More recently, they have found application in reducing firmness, and improving the spreadability and cooking properties (meltability and flowability) of reduced-fat PCPs (Brummel and Lee, 1990; Swenson et al., 2000). While it is difficult to determine the efficacy of the hydrocolloids in the latter studies due to the absence of low-fat controls, both firmness and flowability varied significantly with the type and the level used. Hydrocolloids (locust bean gum, guar gum, modified starch, xanthan gum, low methylated pectin) have recently been investigated as substitutes for sodium phosphate ES (Pluta etal., 2000); a mixture of locust bean gum (0.8%, w/w) and modified starch (2%, w/w) was claimed to give a stable ES-free product and was recommended as a substitute for sodium phosphate in the manufacture of PCPs. Various food-grade emulsifiers (e.g., lecithin, Tweens and Spans) have been used in PCPs, especially in reduced-fat products, to impart softness and improve flowability on melting (Drake et al., 1999). Lee et al. (1996) reported the effects of adding low molecular weight emulsifiers [(sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), Nacetyl-N,N,N-trimethylamonium bromide (CTAB), lecithin, mono- and diglycerides)] on the rheological properties of model PCPs. All emulsifiers led to finer dispersions compared to the controls, but their effect on the rheological properties was largely determined by protein-emulsifier interactions which depended on the emulsifier charge. The cationic CTAB increased hardness and elasticity while the anionic SDS gave a PCP which was softer and less elastic than the control; the neutral lecithins and glycerides had little effect.
A n a l o g u e cheese products (ACPs) Analogue cheese products may be classified as cheese substitutes or imitations, which partly or wholly substitute or imitate cheese and in which milk fat, milk protein or both are partially or wholly replaced by
380
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
non-milk-based components, principally of vegetable origin. However, their designations and labelling should, by law, clearly distinguish them from cheese or PCPs. The labelling requirement for imitation and substitute cheeses has been reviewed by McCarthy (1991). In the USA, an imitation cheese is defined as a product which is a substitute for, and resembles, another cheese but is nutritionally inferior, where nutritional inferiority implies a reduction in the content of an essential nutrient(s) present in a measurable amount but does not include a reduction in the caloric or fat content (Food and Drugs Administration Regulation 101.3, Identity Labelling of Food in Packaged Form (e)). A substitute cheese is defined as a product which is a substitute for, and resembles, another cheese and is not nutritionally inferior. Outside the USA, there is little specific legislation covering imitation or substitute cheeses. Few, if any, standards relating to permitted ingredients or manufacturing procedures
exist for imitation cheese products. For more pertinent information regarding designation and labelling, the reader is referred to IDF (1989), McCarthy (1991), current National Regulations and Codex Alimentarius. Other cheese-like products, which may be classified as imitation or substitute, are Tofu and Filled Cheeses; the latter products have been discussed briefly by Fox et al. (2000) and will not be reviewed here. The general aspects of ACPs have been reviewed recently (Ennis and Mulvihill, 1997; Fox et al., 2000; Guinee, 2002b). Analogue cheese products are cheeselike products manufactured by blending various edible oils/fats, proteins, other ingredients and water into a smooth homogeneous blend with the aid of heat, mechanical shear and ES. The array of ingredients used in ACPs and their functions are listed in Table 7. The effects of various ingredients, processing conditions and low temperature storage on the quality of imitation cheese products have been reported extensively
Ingredients used in the manufacture of cheese analoguesa,b,c, d
Ingredient
Main function~effect
Examples
Fat
Gives desired composition, texture and meltability characteristics; butter oil imparts dairy flavour Give desired composition, semi-hard texture with good shreddability, flow and stretch characteristics on heating Assist in the formation of physico-chemical stable product Gives required composition Low cost relative to casein Rarely, if ever, used commercially as sole protein owing to product defects; may be used at low levels (e.g., 2-3% w/w) Substitution for casein and cost reduction
Butter, anhydrous milk fat, native or partially hydrogenated soya bean oil, corn oil, palm kernel oil Casein, caseinates Whey protein
Assist in the formation of physico-chemically stable product; modify textural and functional properties Enhance product stability; modify texture and functional properties See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 Improve nutritive value
Sodium phosphates and sodium citrates
Milk proteins
Vegetable proteins
Starches Stabilizers Emulsifying salts
Hydrocolloids Acidifying agents Flavours and flavour enhancers Sweetening agents Colours Preservatives Minerals and vitamin preparations
Soya bean protein Peanut protein, wheat gluten
Native and modified forms of maize, rice, potato starches
Hydrocolloids: guar gum, xanthan gum, carageenans See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 See Table 1 Magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, iron, vitamin A palmitate, riboflavin, thiamine, folic acid
a Modified from Guinee (2002b). b The ingredients permitted are subject to the prevailing regulations in the region of manufacture. c Whey proteins mainly for products used in cooking applications where flow resistance is required. d See text for more details on effects of different ingredients (see 'Influence of various parameters on the consistency and cooking characteristics of PCPs and ACPs' and 'Formulation')
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
(Abou El-Ella, 1980; Lee and Marshall, 1981; Yang and Taranto, 1982; Marshall, 1990; Cavalier-Salou and Cheftel, 1991; Kiely et al., 1991; Suarez-Solis et al., 1995; Ennis and Mulvihill, 1997; Abou E1-Nour et al., 2001). Many of these have been discussed in Influence of various parameters on the consistency and cooking characteristics of PCPs and ACPs'. Similarities with PCPs include: 9 the use of many ingredients in common, including ES, stabilizers, non-cheese dairy ingredients, colours, flavours and flavour enhancers; 9 similar manufacturing technology, involving the application of heat and shear to the formulated blend, followed by hot filling, packing and cooling; 9 similar microstructures which may be generally described as an o/w emulsion, stabilized by hydrated (para) caseinate which occurs as a concentrated dispersion (e.g., high-moisture, low-protein ACPs) or as a weakly gelled (para) caseinate dispersion, depending on product composition and hardness (see 'The role of ES in the formation of a physico-chemically stable product' and 'Micro-structure of PCPs and ACPs'); 9 the absence of a ripening period (even though relatively minor changes can take place during cold storage of PCPs and ACPs (cf., Tamime et al., 1990; Guinee, 2002b) 9 the diverse range of textures, flavours, cooking properties and packaging formats; 9 the use of both as alternatives for natural cheese and in similar applications (cf., 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). The major difference between ACPs and PCPs is in the permitted ingredients (as discussed in 'Formulation'), with most commercial analogues containing vegetable-derived fat, rather than milk fat, as in natural and processed cheeses. Analogue cheese products may be arbitrarily categorized as dairy, partial dairy or non-dairy depending on whether the fat and/or protein components are from dairy or vegetable sources (Shaw, 1984; Fox et al., 2000). Partial dairy analogues, in which the fat is mainly vegetable oil (e.g., soya oil, palm oil, rapeseed and their hydrogenated equivalents) and the protein is dairy-based (usually rennet casein and/or caseinate) are the most common. Non-dairy analogues, in which both fat and protein are vegetable-derived, have little or no commercial significance and, to the authors' knowledge, are not commercially available. Dairy analogues are not produced in large quantities because their cost is prohibitive. Partial dairy ACPs were introduced to the market in the USA in the early 1970s and constitute by far the largest group of imitation or substitute cheese products.
381
Since then, the commercial manufacture of analogues of a wide variety of natural cheeses (e.g., Cheddar, Monterey Jack, Mozzarella, Parmesan, Romano, Blue, Cream cheese) and PCPs have been reported in the trade literature (Dietz and Ziemba, 1972; Graf, 1981; Anonymous, 1982, 1986; Shaw, 1984; Morris, 1986). Based on feedback from the marketplace, current annual production of analogue cheese in the USA, the primary manufacturer, is - 3 0 0 000 tonnes (personal communication: Martin O'Donovan, BL Ingredients LLC, Chicago) with the major products being low-moisture Mozzarella, Cheddar and pasteurized processed Cheddar. These products have numerous applications: frozen pizza toppings, slices in beef burgers and ingredient in salads, sandwiches, cheese sauces, cheese dips and ready-prepared meals. Compared to the USA, European production is estimated to be relatively small (e.g., 20 000 tonnes/annum). This may be attributed to the lack of a common European effective legislation policy, the efforts of groups concerned with the protection of the designation of origin of milk and dairy products and/or the relatively low consumption of pizza and cheese as an ingredient in Europe (cf., Guinee, 2002c). Moreover, cheese flavour ingredients (e.g., EMCs) are still insufficiently developed to give analogue cheeses, which could be consumed as table cheeses (K.N. Kilcawley, personal communication), which is the major form of EU cheese consumption. The following have contributed to the success of (partial dairy) ACPs in the USA: (i) their lower cost relative to natural cheeses, coupled with the increase in overall cheese consumption; the low cost of analogues is due to the low cost of vegetable oils (compared to butterfat) and of price-subsidized casein imported from Europe, the absence of a maturation period, which for natural cheeses amounts to -US$1.6/tonne/day and the relatively low cost of manufacturing plant relative to that for natural cheese; (ii) the diversity they can offer by way of functionality (e.g., flowability, melt resistance, shreddability), made possible by tailor-making formulations, coupled with their relatively high functional stability during storage; (iii) the popularity of fast food and ready-prepared meals; (iv) their ability to meet special dietary needs and to act as a vehicle for health benefits/supplements, e.g., lactose-free, low in calories, low in saturated fat, vitaminenriched (Andreas, 1985; Anonymous, 1986; Morris, 1986; Keane and Glaeser, 1990); this is made possible by formulation changes. The following discussion relates to partial dairy analogues, especially analogue low-moisture Mozzarella cheese (LMMC), frequently referred to as analogue pizza cheese, APC.
382
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
APC" principles and manufacturing protocol
The principles of manufacture of APC from rennet casein are similar to those for PCPs involving: 9 the sequestration of Ca from the rennet casein by added ES at the high temperatures (typically ---80-84 ~ 9 upward pH adjustment of the blend by the added ES; 9 concomitant hydration of the casein by the ES, shear and heat; 9 dispersion of added fat by the shear and its emulsification by the hydrated para-caseinate; 9 structure formation during cooling. The manufacturing technology for ACPs is also very similar to that for PCPs (Ennis and Mulvihill, 1997; Fox et al., 2000; Guinee, 2002b), as described in 'Manufacturing protocol for PCPs'. While production methods vary, a typical manufacturing procedure (Fig. 17) involves the following sequence of events: simultaneous addition of required quantities of water and dry ingredients (e.g., casein, ES), addition of oil
I Formulation of blend i A
B
C
Cheese cooker Mix for -1-2 min
+
I
Process: heat to +85 ~ shear continuously
+ Homogeneous molten mass pH -8.5 Homogeneous molten mass I pH +6.0-6.4 I
+
i Mould and hot pack I
+
I Storeat4to-4~
and cooking to ---85 ~ (using direct steam injection) while continuously shearing until a uniform homogeneous molten mass is obtained (typically 5-8 min). Flavouring materials (e.g., EMC, starter distillate) and pH-regulator (e.g., citric acid) are then added and the mixture is blended for a further 1-2 min and hot-packed. Horizontal twin-screw cookers (e.g., Damrow, Blentech), operating at a typical screw speed of 40 rpm, are used in the manufacture of APC. This cooker design ensures adequate blending and a relatively low degree of mechanical shear (e.g., compared to the homogenizing effects of some processed cheese cookers). These process conditions, together with the correct formulation, promote a low degree of fat dispersion and hence a relatively large fat globule size (e.g., 5-25 I~m; Neville and Mulvihill, 1995; Ennis and Mulvihill, 1997; Neville, 1998; Guinee et al., 1999). The relatively large fat globule size ensures a sufficient degree of oiling-off from the APC topping when baked on pizza; this, in turn, limits dehydration of the cheese topping and is conducive to satisfactory flow and succulence characteristics (cf., Rudan and Barbano, 1998; Guinee et al., 2000b; 'Pasta-Filata Cheeses' and 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2). As for PCPs, there is generally an inverse relationship between the DE and the flowability of APCs (Neville, 1998; Mounsey, 2001). Addition of the acid at the end of manufacture, rather than at the beginning, ensures a high pH (--~8-9) in the blend during processing. This procedure is desirable in the manufacture of ACPs where insoluble rennet casein is the major protein ingredient. A high pH during processing leads to greater sequestration of calcium by the sodium phosphate ES, higher negative charge to the casein and higher degree of para-casein hydration. These changes enhance the conversion of the calcium para-casein to sodium para-caseinate, which binds water and emulsifies the vegetable oil (cf., 'The role of ES in the formation of a physico-chemically stable product' and 'Characteristics of different ES in the manufacture of PCPs and ACPs'). Thus, reducing the pH of the blend during processing increases the time required for the formation of the ACPs and probably affects its properties (e.g., firmness, meltability). The addition of flavouring ingredients, such as EMC, towards the end of processing minimizes the loss of flavour volatiles at the high temperature of processing.
I
Formulation Typical manufacturing procedures (A, B, C) for lowmoisture Mozzarella cheese analogue. The procedures differ with respect to the order in which the ingredients (1-5) are added, e.g., casein (1) followed by oil (4) and water (5) in procedure B.
A typical formulation (Table 8) shows that it differs from that for PCPs by the absence of cheese (though some cheese may be optionally introduced as a
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
Typical formulation of low-moisture analogue Mozzarella cheese a
Ingredient
Addition level (%, w/w)
Casein and caseinates Vegetable oil Starch Emulsifying salts Flavours and flavour enhancers Stabilizers Acidifying agent Colour Preservative Water and condensate
18-24 22-28 0.0-3 0.5-2 0.5-3 0.0-0.50 0.2-0.36 0.04 0.10 45-55
a Modified from Guinee (2002b).
flavouring agent) and the inclusion of vegetable oil and a relatively large level of casein(ate)s (cf., Table 1). The major protein source in dairy-based ACPs is caseinate or rennet casein (Nishiya et al., 1989; Ennis and Mulvihill, 1999), with the former being used mainly for spreadable products. Rennet casein is favoured for semi-hard block products and, especially, for APC where it generally imparts better stringiness and stretchability than acid casein or sodium or calcium caseinates. Rennet casein is formed by rennet coagulation of skim milk at normal pH, dehydration of the gel by cutting, stirring and heat treatment, washing of the curd to remove lactose, concentration of the curd by centrifugation and drying, grinding and separation of the dried casein into powders of different mean particle size (Mulvihill, 1992). At the micro-structural level, each powdered particle may be considered as a portion of dried skim milk cheese, with the casein in the form of an agglomerate of aggregates of paracasein. Similar to cheese, various types of attractions are expected to maintain the integrity of the paracasein aggregates (cf., Walstra and van Vliet, 1986), e.g., electrostatic bonds, hydrophobic bonds and calcium phosphate bridges. A further similarity between rennet casein and a young skim milk cheese (with a high level of intact casein) is insolubility in water (cf., Ennis et al., 1998; Fenelon and Guinee, 2000; Feeney et al., 2001). By choosing the appropriate blend of ES, the concentration of calcium cross-linking the paracasein molecules can be reduced to the desired level to give textural and cooking characteristics tailor-made to suit the envisaged application of the product (Fox et al., 2000). On cooking cheese, functional properties such as flow and stretch involve the partial displacement of contiguous layers of the para-casein on the application of stress (see 'Cheese as an Ingredient', Volume 2); a moderate displacement is desirable in cooked pizza cheese (Fox et al., 2000; 'Cheese as an
383
Ingredient', Volume 2). The level of displacement on cooking an ACP depends on the concentration of calcium cross-linking the casein molecules in the final product, which in turn is dependent on the type of casein ingredient used, its total calcium level, the colloidal calcium-to-casein ratio and the concentration and type of ES. For rennet casein which has a high calcium-to-casein ratio (--~36 mg/g casein), the degree of calcium sequestration and para-casein aggregation is easily controlled by using the correct blend of ES to give the desired degree of casein hydration/aggregation and fat emulsification in the ACP (Guinee, 2002b). This, in turn, gives the desired degree of flow and stretchability on cooking the APC. Compared to rennet casein, caseinates tend to over-hydrate, resulting in a degree of casein aggregation which yields good flowability but which is too low to achieve satisfactory stretchability. Owing to the relatively high cost of casein, much effort has been vested in its partial replacement by cheaper substitutes. Increasing the level of substitution of rennet casein by total milk protein, in the range 0-50%, resulted in a progressive increase in firmness and a decrease in the flowability of ACP (Abou-E1-Nour et al., 1996). In a subsequent study, Abou-E1-Nour et al. (2001) investigated the effects of replacing rennet casein by native phosphocasein (NPC) prepared by microfiltration and diafiltration with water (NPC-W) or ultrafiltered milk permeate (NPC-P) in block APC. At 20%, w/w, replacement, the addition of NPC resulted in an increased flowability of the melted APC, with the effect of the NPC-W being significantly greater than that of the NPC-P. In contrast, the NPC-W resulted in a slight decrease in firmness of the unheated ACP whereas the NCP-P gave a marked increase. A comparison between the NPC preparations and the MPC, prepared by UE indicated that the latter gave notably higher firmness in the unheated APC and lower flowability of the heated APC (Abou-E1-Nour et al., 2001). This trend concurs with that of previous studies showing that the addition of whey proteins to PCPs or ACPs, as a substitute for cheese or casein, impairs flowability and increases firmness (cf., 'Blend ingredients: cheese base (CB), ultrafiltered milk retentate (UFMR), cheeses from high heat-treated milks and whey proteins'). Hence, whey proteins are not used owing to the negative impact on flowability, except in applications where flow-resistant ACPs may be needed (e.g., cheese insets in burgers) when --~1-3%, w/w, whey protein is added. Studies have been undertaken on the effects of replacing casein in ACPs by various types of vegetable proteins, e.g., soybean (Lee and Marshall, 1981; Taranto and Yang, 198i; Yang and Taranto, 1982; Yang et al.,
384
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
1983; Kim etal., 1992; Ortega-Fleitas etal., 2001), peanut (Chen etal., 1979), pea protein (E1-Sayed, 1997) or wheat protein (Anonymous, 1981). These proteins gave varying results, depending on the ingredient preparation (e.g., soy flour or soy isolate, pH, fat content) and the type and level of other ingredients (e.g., hydrocolloids). However, the use of these protein substitutes, especially at a level > 10-20%, w/w, of the total protein, has, in general, been found to give ACPs which have a quality inferior to that made using casein only. Common defects include lack of elasticity, lower hardness, an adhesive/sticky body, impaired flow and stretchability and/or poor flavour. Hence, vegetable proteins are rarely used in the commercial manufacture of APCs. To date, starch has been the most effective low-cost casein substitute. Native maize starch appears to be the main type used commercially, with starches from other sources and with different types of modification (pre-gelatinized and/or chemically or enzymatically modified) being used less frequently (Ennis and Mulvihill, 1997). Native starches are used successfully commercially at a level of 2-4%, w/w, to replace ---10-15%, w/w, of total casein. At higher levels of substitution, product defects become noticeable- an increase in the firmness and brittleness of the unheated ACP and a decrease in the fluidity and flowability of the melted cheese, especially if the starch has a high amylose-to-amylopectin ratio (Mounsey and O'Riordan, 1999, 2001; Guinee, 2002b; Figs 18, 19). Moreover, on shredding, the unheated APC with added starch tends to fracture more easily to form curd fines and also tends to exude free moisture after a short period of cold storage, which often leads to sticking and bailing 70
during shredding operations. These defects, which occur to a degree dependent on the type and level of added starch (Mounsey and O'Riordan, 1999, 2001; Mounsey, 2001; Figs 18, 19), cooking temperature and time, degree of agitation and cooling rate, are probably related to storage-related retrogradation and gelation of the starch molecules (especially amylose). Starches (e.g., maize, ,#heat) with a high ratio of amylose to amylopectin tend to retrograde and undergo gelation more readily than those (e.g., waxy maize, rice, potato) with a lower level of amylose (cf., Miura et al., 1992) during storage of the ACP. The other factors above probably influence the degree of gelatinization of the starch during the manufacture of the ACPs and, thus, the concentration of free amylose molecules available for gelation. It is envisaged that a starch gel would impede the flow of the heated cheese when cooked on pizza. The adverse effects of starch may also be related to an increased degree of fat emulsification (Mounsey and O'Riordan, 2001), as a result of a higher apparent viscosity of the APC blend during manufacture when starch is added, especially at high levels. Composition and functionality
Analysis of commercial APC indicates large intra- and inter-factory variations in composition (Guinee et al., 2000c; Guinee, 2002), e.g., moisture, 40-52%, w/w; fat, 60
50
o
60
40
d C~ c-
o~
5o r
40 0 LL
30
13_
20
30 2O
10
10 0
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
30
60
90
120
150
180
Storage time at 4 ~
days
Changes in the flowability, after heating at 280 ~ for 4 min, of low-moisture Mozzarella (A) and low-moisture Mozzarella cheese analogues without (O) or with added native maize (A) or potato (I-1) starch during storage at 4 ~ (modified from Guinee, 2002b).
0 2 4 6 8 10 Level of added pre-gelatinized maize starch, %, w/w Effect of level of added pre-gelatinized maize starch on the fluidity of experimental analogue pizza cheese, after heating to 20 ~ or 95 ~ (drawn from data of Mounsey and O'Riordan, 1999).
Pasteurized Processed Cheese and Substitute/Imitation Cheese Products
22-30%, w/w; protein, 13-21%, w/w; 31-38 mg Ca/g protein. Such variations undoubtedly reflect differences in formulation, which suggest that formulation change is a key approach used by manufacturers in the production of APCs with customized nutritional, textural and/or functional (cooking) characteristics. Comparison with commercial Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese (LMMC) shows that APC has a lower protein content, higher concentrations of moisture and fat, and higher ratios of Ca- and P-to-protein (Guinee et al., 2000c). The higher ratios of Ca- and P-to-protein reflect the use of rennet casein (which has higher concentrations of Ca and P on a protein basis than most natural cheeses) and the inclusion of sodium phosphate ES during formulation. Moreover, the mean value for the sum of moisture, fat, protein and ash in commercial APC is --96.5%, w/w, compared to ---99.5%, w/w, in the LMMC, indicating the addition of carbohydrate-based ingredients during formulation (Guinee et al., 2000c). The heat-induced functional properties of LMMC are discussed in detail in 'Pasta-Filata Cheeses', Volume 2. These generally change fairly markedly with storage time at ar ~ as reflected by reductions in apparent viscosity and an increase in the flowability of the heated cheese; depending on the cheese type, the stretchability of the melted cheese generally increases at first and decreases thereafter. The changes in these functional attributes are due to various factors including age-related physico-chemical changes in the cheese, including proteolysis, solubilization of casein-bound calcium and increases in para-casein hydration and in the level of non-globular fat (Kindstedt, 1995; Guinee 2002c). Similar to PCPs, the functionality of freshly manufactured APCs (e.g., after storage at 4~ for o
c-~ "F
o
E
9~~.~~ ~
"'---
o~8~~- ~
O r~ C
0
o
(1.) ...., (..)
~-~,_
o
i.-
c
.=~ -~~ ~~
>'04 o
t:3
~
>,
, ~
~
~
O
cr
ro
~
r
'-
~o
~
"-'
~
o=-e
'6 >
~~
~,-
~
'-
~
-
~
,.-
& 8 ~ ~ .~_ ~ _o,-.~._.
~
" E
:.E-~
~
=
~ .=
_~ - ~.~,
-
9~
o.- ~ so ~
'~~
'6-~
~"~
r
-=-5 ~-o= ~ ~
s~
,
.=>'~
0
~
o
,~ ~-
g~ --_.~ c
8
O
.~_
~
o ~ o -~ -z~ o.~ I
0.7) that are generally of a magnitude which results in large deformation and fracture (i.e., breakdown into smaller pieces): portioning of cheese into retail sizes, shredding into thin narrow cylindrical pieces (e.g., 2.5 cm long and 0.4 cm diameter), dicing into very small cubes (0.4 cm) and comminution by forcing precut cheese through die plates with narrow apertures. Similarly, when eaten, cheese is subjected to a number of strains which reduce it to a paste capable of being swallowed; first, the cheese is bitten (cut by the incisors), compressed (by the molars) on chewing and sheared (between the palate and the tongue, and between the teeth). The behaviour of the cheese when exposed to the different size-reduction methods constitutes a group of important functional properties, which are summarized in Table 1. In general, apart from shreddability, there is little information in the scientific literature on the functional properties of unheated cheese or how they
Rheological properties of unheated cheese which affect its functionality as an ingredient
Types of properties
Description
Measurements 1
Elasticity and related properties (springiness, toughness)
Tendency of cheese to recover to original dimensions following removal of the applied stress (o-, force per unit surface area)
Fracturability
Tendency of cheese to fracture into pieces when a stress (o-) is applied, e.g., during compression or extension
Recovery of sample after compression, obtained using Texture Profile Analysis Fracture stress (o-f) - force to fracture Fracture strain (sf) -displacement at fracture
(and related terms)
- brittleness
-Iongness
- crumbliness Firmness (and related terms) - Firm - Soft Adhesiveness
Tendency to fracture into pieces at a low deformation or displacement (strain; s, i.e., after a low-percentage compression). Low deformation at fracture, i.e., low sf Tendency to fracture at a large deformation, i.e., high 8 f The tendency to break down easily into small, irregular shaped particles (e.g., by rubbing) Resistance of a cheese to be deformed (e.g., compressed) when subjected to a stress (o-) High resistance to deformation, i.e., high O m a x Low resistance to deformation, i.e., low O m a x Tendency to be sticky and resist separation from a material it contacts
Firmness (O-max)- - stress (o-) required to achieve a given compression/extension
Texture Profile Analysis
References used in compilation: van Vliet (1991), Visser (1991), Fox etaL (2000), Guinee (2002). See 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1 for details of rheology tests. 1 Measurements obtained from large strain deformation tests, as in compression testing or Texture Profile Analysis using a Texture Analyzer; see 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1 for details of tests.
400
Cheese as an Ingredient
may be related to its rheological properties, which determine:
over the pizza base, preparation of sandwiches and use in salad bars. Mature Camembert or Chaumes, which are soft, short and adhesive, are very unsuitable for 9 the magnitude of the stress required to fracture shredded/diced cheese applications because of their (fracture stress, of); tendency to stick to the shredding equipment and of 9 the degree of strain (e.g., change in dimensions) the shredded cheese to bailing and clumping. Howrequired to fracture (fracture strain, ~f); ever, the ability of these cheeses to undergo plastic 9 the level of force or stress required to achieve a fracture and flow under shear (i.e., spread) makes given deformation (O'max); them ideal for spreading on crackers and for blending 9 the type of fracture (i.e., clean or jagged); with other materials such as butter, milk or flour in 9 the degree to which a piece of cheese recovers (in the preparation of fondues and sauces. The brittleness size dimensions) after being strained (e.g., comand tendency of hard cheeses, such as Parmesan and pressed or sheared). Romano, with low levels of moisture and fat-in-dry The various rheological terms (o'f, el, O'max) matter, to undergo elastic fracture (clean fracture withdescribed above are easily measured from the force (or out flow) endows them with excellent gratability stress, o-)/displacement (or strain, e) curve obtained (when crushed between rollers) and suitability as a during compression of a cheese sample, as described free-flow condiment for sprinkling, e.g., onto pasta in 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1. On dishes. However, these properties render the latter consideration of the forces operative during deforma- cheeses unsuitable for food applications that require tion, and the structure and the biochemistry of cheese, slices (e.g., filled sandwiches, cheeseburgers) or shredit can be inferred that relationships do exist between ded cheese. The crumbliness of Feta and Stilton makes the functional and the rheological characteristics of them very desirable for use in tossed salads and Greek unheated cheese. Similarly, cheese texture, which is a salads as the irregularly shaped, curd-like particles crecomposite sensory attribute resulting from a combin- ate an image of 'real' cheese and are more visually ation of physical properties that are perceived by the appealing to the consumer than cheese shreds. senses of touch (including kinaesthesis and mouthfeel), sight and hearing, has been found to be related Factors influencing the rheological (functional) to rheological (stress-strain) characteristics of cheese properties of unheated cheese (Szczesniak, 1963; Sherman, 1969; Brennan, 1988). Cheese rheology and the factors that affect it have The relationships between some common functional been studied (Culioli and Sherman, 1976; Vernon properties and the rheological parameters of the raw Carter and Sherman, 1978; Chen et al., 1979; Creamer cheese, as described below, are given in Table 1. and Olson, 1982; Green et al., 1985; Luyten, 1988; The rheological characteristics of the raw cheese Visser, 1991; Fenelon and Guinee, 2000) and reviewed have a major impact on how it behaves during com- extensively (van Vliet, 1991; Visser, 1991; Rao, 1992; minution and its usability as an ingredient (Table 2). Prentice et al., 1993; Fox et al., 2000; 'Rheology and Thus, it is difficult to cleanly portion hard cheeses Texture of Cheese', Volume 1). The rheology of cheese which have a relatively a low fracture strain (Parmesan) is a function of the combined effects of various factors, or which fracture in a jagged fashion (e.g., an over- including its composition, micro-structure (i.e., the acid Cheddar or Cheshire) owing to their tendency to spatial arrangement of its components and the break at the edges. Similarly, these cheeses are unsuit- strength of attractions between the structural elements) able for applications where shredded cheese is and the physico-chemical state of its components (e.g., required (e.g., pizza) because of their susceptibility to degree of casein hydrolysis). Moreover, it is difficult to fracture/shattering and the resultant formation of a quantify the direct effects of any of the gross composhigh level of curd fines/dust on the surface of the itional components (fat, protein or moisture) separately, uncooked pizza, which is aesthetically unappealing. owing to the fact that these tend to vary simultanConversely, other hard cheeses, such as Cheddar, low- eously, especially where large changes in the concenmoisture Mozzarella (LMMC) and Gouda-type, are tration of a particular component (e.g., fat) occur and unsuitable for grating owing to their lack of brittleness in the absence of process interventions. However, and to their elasticity and relatively high o'f and el, for convenience, the effects of individual factors are which enables a relatively high degree of recovery to discussed separately below. their original shape and dimensions following crushing. However, the latter cheeses generally shred very Protein level well to give pieces of uniform size which are relatively The concentration and the type of protein have a non-adhesive, which makes them ideal for distribution major influence on the rheological properties, as
Cheese
confirmed by the positive correlation between the volume fraction of the casein matrix and cheese firmness (O'max) and the o-f; de Jong, 1977; Guinee et al., 2000a; (Fig. 3), and by the effects of gel fineness or coarseness on the rheological characteristics of the matrix (Green etal., 1983; Green, 1990b; Guinee etal., 1993b). Hence, reduced-fat Cheddar, which has a high volume fraction of para-casein matrix relative to full-fat Cheddar, is firmer, and has a higher o-f, than the latter (Fenelon and Guinee, 2000). The large influence of protein becomes apparent when the effects of an applied stress to cheese structure are considered; the protein matrix provides the first resistance to deformation. The stress-bearing capacity of the matrix is dependent on its volume fraction and homogeneity, which determine the number of stress-bearing strands per unit area. Considering a gel to which a relatively small stress (i.e., much less than the fracture stress) is applied in the direction x, the elastic shear modulus (G', i.e., ratio of shear stress to shear strain, ofT), which is an index of elasticity or strength of the gel, can be related to the number of strands per unit area according to the equation (Walstra and van Vliet, 1986): d2A G' = C N ~ dx 2
where: N = number of strands per unit area of the gel in a cross section perpendicular to x, bearing the stress; C = coefficient related to the characteristic length
1200
o 900
1000
=
9
800
700 %
~
600
9 9
-
.~/'~~"
[]
99 'g,~d*. ~",2"~[] ~
=.--"~'~
~
[]
s00
9
9 9 ~'-= [ ]". 7=, . 7 / ~ _=9 [] [] 9 O[]o7../~= % []~o[]
400
"
[]
0
20
[]
g 'iT_
~"~_ [] ". [] [] 200
z
300
'g
'
'
'
25
30
35
100 40
Intact casein, %, w/w Relationship b e t w e e n the c o n t e n t of intact casein and (If]) and the fracture stress (m) in C h e d d a r c h e e s e s of v a r y i n g fat content in t h e r a n g e 6 - 3 1 % , w / w (reprinted from G u i n e e et aL, 2 0 0 0 a with permission from Elsevier).
firmness
as
an
Ingredient
401
determining the geometry of the network; dA = change in elastic energy when the aggregates in the strands are moved apart by a distance, dx, on application of the stress. The number of strands per unit area of a gel are determined by: 9 the concentration of gel-forming protein; 9 the fineness or coarseness of the gel, with a fine gel network having a greater number of stress-bearing strands than a coarse gel. As the concentration of casein in the matrix increases, the intra- and the inter-strand linkages become more numerous, and the matrix more elastic (Ma et al., 1997) and more difficult to deform (de Jong, 1976, 1978a; Chen et al., 1979; Prentice et al., 1993). At low temperatures ( < 5 ~ milk fat is predominantly solid and adds to the elasticity of the casein matrix. The solid fat globules limit the deformation of the casein matrix, as deformation of the latter would also require deformation of the fat globules enmeshed within its porous structure. However, the contribution of fat to the elasticity of cheese decreases rapidly as the ratio of solid-to-liquid fat decreases with increasing temperature and is very low at 40 ~ where all the milk fat is liquid (Guinee and Law, 2002). High heat treatment (HHT) of milk and denatured whey proteins High heat treatment of milk increases the level of in-situ denaturation of whey proteins and their complexation with K-CN at the micelle surfaces. The denatured whey proteins form appendages which protrude from the micelle surfaces and render the Phe]05mMetl06 bond of K-CN less susceptible to hydrolysis by rennet (van Hooydonk et al., 1987; McMahon et al., 1993b). These changes coincide with a reduction in the degree of casein aggregation/fusion during rennet-induced gel formation and the remaining post gel-cutting cheesemaking operations and an increased level of denatured whey proteins incorporated into the gel matrix (Pearse et al., 1985; Green, 1990a,b). Consequently, rennetinduced milk gels from HHT milk have a relatively fine structure, low porosity and an increased waterholding capacity. Cheese prepared from HHT milk (e.g., 82 ~ for 15 s) has lower o-f and Crmax than cheese made from milk pasteurized at a normal temperature (e.g., 72 ~ for 15 s; E1-Koussy et al., 1977; Marshall, 1986; Green et al., 1990a,b; Guinee et al., 1998). These effects are attributable to the reduced degree of para-casein aggregation, the increased level of denatured whey proteins in the protein network and the generally higher moisture level. Owing to its effect on cheese rheology, high levels of denatured whey proteins in cheese milk may
402
Cheese as an Ingredient
be exploited as a means of improving the texture (reducing the firmness and elasticity) of low-fat cheeses which tend to be excessively firm and rubbery (Guinee et al., 1998). For similar reasons, the inclusion of whey protein-based fat mimetics (e.g., Simplesse | 100 and Dairy Lo TM) in reduced-fat Cheddar reduces of, ef and O'ma x (Lucey and Gorry, 1994; Fenelon and Guinee, 1997). The whey proteins in these preparations, at least in the case of Dairy Lo TM, appear to interact with the casein to form a complex- type gel during Cheddar manufacture. Various studies have examined the effects of adding denatured whey proteins, in the form of partially de-natured whey protein concentrates (PDWPC; prepared by the Centriwhey, Lactal or UF processes), to cheese milk for the manufacture of hard or semi-hard cheeses, primarily as a means of enhancing cheese yield. The addition of WPC increases the moisture content, actual yield and moisture-adjusted yield, with the extent of the increase being correlated positively with the degree of denaturation of the added WPC (van den Berg, 1979; Brown and Ernstrom, 1982; Banks and Muir, 1985; Baldwin et al., 1986; Punidadas et al., 1999; Meade and Roupas, 2001). However, the addition of PDWPC has, generally, been found to cause defective body (greasy, soft) and flavour (unclean, astringent) characteristics in Gouda and Cheddar cheeses (van den Berg, 1979), with the intensity of the defects becoming more pronounced with increasing level of the PDWPC added. It has been suggested that these defects may be due to the large size of whey protein particles (aggregates) which do not fit compactly within the pores of the para-casein matrix, and thereby impede its shrinkage and syneretic potential (van den Berg, 1979). Fat c o n t e n t
reduction in the concentration of intact casein. Moreover, liquid fat confers viscosity and also acts as a lubricant on fracture surfaces of the casein matrix and thereby reduces the stress required to fracture the matrix (Marshall, 1990; Prentice et al., 1993). Similarly, reducing the fat content (e.g., from 21-25%, w/w, to "--9-11%, w/w) of low- (47.7-51.8%, w/w) or high(52.2-57.4%, w/w) moisture Mozzarella cheeses resulted in significant increases in hardness and springiness at 1 and 6 weeks, with the magnitude of the effect being the most pronounced for hardness (Tunick et al., 1993). There was a significant effect of the interaction between scald temperature and fat content on hardness, with the effect of fat reduction on hardness being more pronounced as the scald temperature was raised from 32.4 to 45.9 ~ This suggests a higher degree of para-casein aggregation at the higher temperature, an occurrence that would be expected to impede the level of displacement of contiguous casein layers obtained for a given stress. Owing to its effect on the ratio of solid-to-liquid fat in the cheese, temperature has a marked influence on cheese rheology, with the elastic shear modulus (G'), E, o'f and O'max decreasing as the temperature increased (Guinee and Law, 2002; 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1). The effect of the solid-to-liquid fat ratio, as affected by temperature, on the rheological properties of cheese and its use as an ingredient is evident in many instances. Hence, in pizza manufacture, cheese is tempered to, and maintained at, a low temperature prior to shredding (e.g., - 2 ~ so as to maximize the elastic contribution of fat and reduce the tendency of the cheese to stick or clump, and thereby facilitate free flow and distribution onto the pizza surface. Similarly, cheeses are maintained at refrigeration temperatures prior to portioning and slicing to get clean cutting and reduce the risk of surface smearing and greasiness by 'sweated' fat.
Alteration of the fat content has a major effect on the rheological properties of cheese varieties, including Cheddar, LMMC and Cottage cheeses (see Guinee and Law, 2002). Such effects are expected because of the differences in the viscoelastic contributions of fat and casein, as discussed above. However, the overall effects of the changing fat content may be attributed in large part to the interactive effects of changes in the levels of fat, moisture and protein. This is because a reduction in fat content (especially if large, e.g., >4%, w/w) is generally paralleled by increases in moisture, protein, intact casein and Ca. At temperatures of ~--4-20 ~ increasing the level of fat in Cheddar cheese results in decreases in elasticity (E), of, el, Crmax, cohesiveness, springiness, chewiness and gumminess and an increase in adhesiveness. The latter trends are expected because of the concomitant
Homogenization of cheesemilk and degree of fat emulsification Homogenization of milk is practised in the manufacture of some cheese varieties where lipolysis is important for flavour development, e.g., Blue cheese, to increase the accessibility of the fat to mould lipases and thereby increase the formation of fatty acids and their derivatives (e.g., methyl ketones; Fox et al., 1996). Moreover, homogenization is an essential step in the manufacture of cheeses from recombined milks and some acid curd varieties with a high fat content (e.g., Cream cheese; see 'Acid- and Acid/Rennet-Curd Cheeses: Part A Quark, Cream Cheese and Related Varieties, Part B Cottage Cheese, Part C Acidheat Coagulated Cheeses', Volume 2). Homogenization reduces the mean fat globule size and increases the surface area of the fat by a factor of 5-6 (McPherson et al.,
C h e e s e as an Ingredient
1989). The newly formed fat globules are coated with a membrane consisting of casein micelles, sub-micelles, whey proteins and some of the original fat globule membrane (Walstra and Jenness, 1984; Keenan et al., 1988). The membrane enables the newly formed fat globules to behave as pseudo-protein particles which can interact with the casein micelles and become an integral part of the gel matrix formed during acid or rennet gelation of milk (van Vliet and Dentener-Kikkert, 1982; Green et al., 1983; Lelievre et al., 1990; Tunick et al., 1997; Michalski et al., 2002). Hence, the effective protein concentration of, and the overall level of protein-protein interactions in, the casein matrix are thereby increased. Homogenization of cheesemilk, e.g., at respective first and second stage pressures of 17.6 and 3.5 MPa, generally results in a higher moisture level and decreases in the magnitude of o-f and O'max o f reducedfat Cheddar (Emmons et al., 1980; Metzger and Mistry, 1994). Similarly, homogenization of milk for full-fat Mozzarella (---22%, w/w, fat) cheese, at combined first and second stage pressures of 250 or 500 kPa, resulted in significant decreases in hardness and springiness and an increase in cohesiveness; simultaneously, there were non-significant decreases in gumminess and chewiness (Jana and Upadhyay, 1991). The magnitude of these changes, which increased with homogenization pressure, coincided with a decrease in protein content and increases in the contents of moisture (i.e., - 5 % , w/w) and MNFS. In contrast, Tunick etal. (1993) reported that two-stage homogenization of milk at combined first and second stage pressures of 10.3 or 17.2 MPa resulted in a general increase in the hardness of low-fat ( - 9 % , w/w) or high-fat (~25%, w/w) Mozzarella cheese after storage for 1-6 weeks, the effect being more pronounced for low-fat cheese. Moreover, there was a significant effect of the interaction between homogenization pressure and scald temperature used in cheese manufacture, with the increase in hardness being more pronounced for the higher scald temperature cheeses. The higher hardness at the higher scald temperature probably reflects an increase in the degree of casein aggregation, an effect that would be enhanced as the effective casein concentration increases with homogenization of the milk. Rudan et al. (1998) reported that homogenization of cheesemilk or cream (first and second stage pressure, 13.8 and 3.45 MPa) did not significantly affect the hardness or springiness of reducedfat ( - 8 % , w/w) Mozzarella cheese at 30 days. The discrepancies between the latter two studies, in which the moisture content of the control and the homogenized milk cheeses were similar, may reflect differences in homogenization conditions, test conditions, age of cheese and fat content (see Fox et al., 2000; 'Rheology and Texture of Cheese', Volume 1).
403
Moisture content
Increasing the moisture content, while maintaining the ratios of the other compositional parameters relatively constant, reduces the concentration of protein and the volume fraction of the casein matrix (de Jong, 1978a). Hence, increasing the moisture content of Dutch-type Meshanger cheese from 40 to 60%, w/w, resulted in a marked reduction in O'max. Similarly, increasing the moisture content of 7.5-month-old Gouda cheese from --~32 to 46%, w/w, resulted in progressive decreases in E, crf and O'max (Luyten, 1988; Visser, 1991); the ef increased slightly with moisture content to an extent dependent on cheese pH and maturity. Similarly, Watkinson et al. (2002) reported that an increase in the moisture content of model Cheddar-like cheeses, from 40 to 48%, w/w, resulted in a large decrease in E and degree of cracking at fracture and large increases in ~f and adhesiveness (stickiness). Creamer and Olson (1982) reported a linear decrease in of as the moisture content of Cheddar was increased from 34.0 to 39.7%, w/w, with of at the lower moisture level being almost twice that at the higher moisture level. Salt (NaCI) content The effects of salt in the moisture phase (S/M) in the range 0.4-12%, w/w, on the rheology of model Goudatype cheeses, in which the levels of the other compositional parameters were relatively constant, were studied by Luyten (1988) and Visser (1991). The range of S/M investigated was inclusive of the values that span the spectrum of different varieties, e.g., from --~2.0%, w/w, in Emmental to --~12%, w/w, in Feta. Increasing the concentration of S/M in this range resulted in progressive increases in E, o-f (from --~28 kPa at 0.4%, w/w, S/M to --~83 kPa at 11.3%, w/w, S/M) and O-max (Visser, 1991). The fracture strain, el, increased slightly to a maximum at 4.5-5.0%, w/w, S/M, then decreased sharply to a value which was about half the maximum at 5.5%, w/w, S/M and thereafter remained relatively constant as the S/M was increased to 11.3%, w/w. The effects of salt are probably attributable to its effects on the degree of protein hydration. In low-concentration brines (i.e., -,o~ o ~
,.9.0
=o
= ~
~ ~
~"" ~ "~ -o ~2~~ ~
O0
'4--
Or)
"13
..-,
,,_t, ~ JD r
0
=
2
9
E
0
O0
o
~
=
_
(D ,,-
if) "0 c
c~
c ~ - ~
-
E E
0
~ ~ ~
"o
~-.
~
or)
0
or) C O
_-
N
oE
~
~
-
oOE o # _= v
n,,,
~0
m
,4-
a'N
gm
E ' ~ e e c
o~
o
c~
ooor c
..c
"_5 0
13.
"-
O.
.--
---'
~
I~
~
~o
~ c ~ ~ . -
~ ~ c-
C ,4_
0
0
>,'~,_
>,
o
c-
.-
9
9
9
9
9
9
o & v .....4
o. I~..,.
~
.~ u_
~ 1 7 6 1 7 6: ~ 9
oO~_
c
0
.m
9
O3 "13
s
>,t-
>"
o-~
0~
c c
.
z
.
.
.
~
z
,--
~.=_ ,~ $ E .~ ,t::
._~
~.c
0
~
..a
i,.,.. t33 c
o 0
_ =~
=
.~=
oo
-
_~~
9 ~-~
~E ,.- _
9
c
0
.--
C
C
0
w
0
o
~-~o
~--~
0
or)
-o
O0
C
(D
o.s
~-
~ 11)
E
I:~ c
c
r
~---:'~
o
. 0~ --
>, ~ ~.c .--9 _ o ~ C 0 "--
r~
l::n c-~
>,
~
E ~._ ~_0
c-
~ .(:~
-'~ 0
.~:~=
x
~-.- .,_, 0 0
~ ~ m.~ .--
o
d
o (D
=
Or)
.~~o
9 "~
c-
c-
0
96%, w/w, dry matter) Outline of production processfor cheese powder.Abbreviations:EMDIs, enzyme-modifieddairy ingredients;MSG, monosodium glutamate.
C h e e s e as an Ingredient
whey or skim milk solids, starches, maltodextrins and butter-fat. In addition to antioxidants, fat encapsulation technology, which reduces the level of free fat in the powder, may be used to reduce the susceptibility to oxidative rancidity. The type and the level of ingredients used in the formulation depend on powder type (e.g., natural or extended), wettability and solubility characteristics and application (Anonymous, 1991). Typical formulations of the slurries required for natural and extended cheese powders with different levels of cheese solids are given in Table 4. The flavour profile and intensity of the final cheese powder is determined by the type(s) of cheese used and the type(s) and level(s) of other flavouring agents (such as EMC, hydrolysed butter-fat, starter distillates) and flavour enhancers (e.g., sodium chloride, monosodium glutamate, autolysed yeast extract). Generally, mature cheese with an intense flavour is used so as to impart a strong flavour to the final product. Apart from their lack of flavour-imparting properties, young cheeses with a high level of intact casein are unsuitable as they result in very viscous slurries, which are difficult to atomize and dry efficiently. Filling materials in extended cheese powders are usually added to replace cheese solids and thereby reduce the formulation costs. However, they may influence the flavour, wettability and mouth-coating characteristics of the product in which the cheese powder is used. (b) Processing of the blend and slurry formation. Processing principles and technology are similar to those used for the manufacture of PCPs. Processing involves heating the blend (using direct steam injec-
417
tion) to a temperature of---75-85 ~ in a processed cheese-type cooker, or in large (e.g., 5000 L) 'dissolving tanks' (e.g., Limitech) with shearing blades, while continuously shearing (e.g., at 1500-3000 rpm). Maintaining the temperature