Comment. Math. Helvetici 66 (1991) 505-511
0010-2571/91/040505-0751.50 + 0.20/0 9 1991 Birkh~iuserVerlag, Basel
A bala...
31 downloads
390 Views
235KB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Comment. Math. Helvetici 66 (1991) 505-511
0010-2571/91/040505-0751.50 + 0.20/0 9 1991 Birkh~iuserVerlag, Basel
A balanced proper modification of/)3 LUCIA ALESSANDRINI AND GIOVANNI BASSANELLI*
I. Introduction Since a p r o p e r modification M o f a K~ihler m a n i f o l d is not necessarily K~hler, it is n a t u r a l to ask what kind of weaker geometrical properties are preserved in this situation. In particular we are interested in the existence o f a balanced metric on M, i.e. a metric such that the trace o f the torsion o f the Chern connection vanishes. We p o i n t out that balanced manifolds are, in some sense, d u a l to Kfihlerian ones: in fact, a metric is balanced if its K/ihler form is " c o - c l o s e d " (see Definition 3.1); moreover, balanced n-dimensional manifolds are characterized by means o f their (n - 1, n - 1)-currents as well as K~ihler manifolds can be characterized by (1, 1)-currents (see [Mi] and [HL]). The classical example o f H i r o n a k a ([Hi] or IS]) o f a M o i s h e z o n non algebraic manifold X is given by a p r o p e r modification o f P3; in this note we prove that X is balanced. F r o m a geometrical point o f view, the obstruction for X to be K/ihler is a curve h o m o l o g o u s to zero on the exceptional divisor E: in a dual manner, our p r o o f lies in showing that if E is not h o m o l o g o u s to zero then M is balanced. This result is a first c o n f i r m a t i o n o f the conjecture: " E v e r y p r o p e r modification o f a K/ihler manifold is b a l a n c e d . " A b o u t techniques, since positive currents which are ( p , p ) - c o m p o n e n t s o f b o u n d a r i e s are not necessarily closed (see Question on p. 170 in [HL]), we c a n n o t apply the well k n o w n results on (locally) flat currents, and therefore we must develope a parallel technique for positive d0--closed currents.
*This work is partially supported by MPI, 40%. The second author thanks the Department of Mathematics of the University of Trento for its kind hospitality during the preparation of this paper.
506
LUCIA ALESSANDRINI A N D GIOVANNI BASSANELLI
2. Preliminaries
Let M be a connected complex manifold of dimension n; we denote as usually by ~P the sheaf of germs of holomorphic p-forms and by gP the sheaf of germs of ~ p-forms. Moreover, let ~P'P(M)R denote the Fr6chet space of real (p, p)-forms, while 8~.p(M)R denotes its dual space of real currents of bidimension (p, p). We will say that T ~ g'p.p(M)R is the (p, p)-component o f a boundary if there exists a current S such that for every ~o e gP'P(M), T(~o) = S(d~o), i.e. there exists a (p, p + 1)-current S such that T = ffS + OS. Let V be a complex vector space of dimension n, p an integer and ~p.'= iP22 P. An element of A p'~ that can be expressed as v~ ^ 9 9 9 ^ vp with vj~ Vis called simple. 2.1 D E F I N I T I O N . ([AA] and [AB]) ~ E o~P'P(M)R is called transverse if Vx e M, Vv ~ AP(T'~M), v r 0 and simple, it holds O x ( a i l v ^ ~) > O. T ~ g'p.p(M)a is called positive if T(O) > 0 for every transverse (p, p)-form Q. 2.2 R E M A R K . ([H1] p. 325-326) A positive (p,p)-current T has measure coefficients, and moreover, if [tTt[ denotes the mass of T, there exists a HT[[-measurable function ir such that ][iPx [I = 1 for HTI[-a.e. x ~ M, and
= f (L)II TH for all test forms r Let us prove now our main technical tool. 2.3 T H E O R E M . Let M be a complex n-dimensional manifold, and let T be a positive (p, p)-current on M such that d J T = 0 and the Hausdorff 2p-measure o f supp T, H2p(T), vanishes. Then T = O. 2.4 R E M A R K S . In this statement, M is not assumed to be compact. If moreover T is closed, the result is well known (see for instance [F]). P r o o f o f Theorem 2.3. Let x0~ supp T; as in [H2] p. 72 we can choose a coordinate neighbourhood (U, Z l , . . . , zn) centered at x0 such that for every increasing multiindex/, [I I = p, it holds locally: (a) if nz is the projection defined by T~I(Z 1 . . . . . Z n ) = (Zil . . . . . Zip), supp TC~ Ker n, = {Xo} (b) there exist two balls A'I~CP, A ~ C n-p such that ( A ' , x b A T ) c ~ supp T = ~ . This implies that n~ [suppr : supp T c~(d) x A 7 ) ~ A ) is a proper map.
A balanced proper modification of P~
507
Fix an I, I I [ = p, and call T,,= (z~, Isupp T). ( r ) ; 7", is a OJ-closed (p, p)-current on A), hence it can be identified with a OJ-closed distribution fr on A); since J) is pluriharmonic, it is smooth. But 7zI is a Lipschitzian map, and therefore H2p(suppf~) = 0, i.e. J) = 0. Let
c o , = a ~ d z ~ AdZ~ in B . ' = ~ (A} x AT). I
Since
T is positive, in order to prove
T=0
it is enough
to verify that
TO~B(e)P/p!)) = 0. But in B o) p
p! - ~, ap dz, ^ dS, = ~, (Ts
•I
A
de, ),
therefore
T Zo