KANTOR, W. M.
Math. Zeitschr. 103, 67/68 (1968)
4-HomogeneousGroups* WILLIAM M. KANTOR Received April 19, 1967 A k,hom...
6 downloads
479 Views
127KB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
KANTOR, W. M.
Math. Zeitschr. 103, 67/68 (1968)
4-HomogeneousGroups* WILLIAM M. KANTOR Received April 19, 1967 A k,homogeneous group is a permutation group which acts transitively on the set of k element subsets of the set of permuted points. LIVINGSTONE and WAGNER [4, Theorem 2(b)] have shown that a k-homogeneous group of finite degree > 2 k is k-transitive if k > 5. We shall prove the following Theorem. If G is 4-homogeneous but not 4-transitive on a finite set O, 1s >5, then G is similar to one of the following groups in its usual permutation representation: PSL(2, 5), PGL(2, 5), PSL(2, 23), PFL(2, 23), or PFL(2, 25).
Proof. Let I~l =n. For the cases n = 6 or 7, see [1, pp.215-217]. We now assume that n > 8, in which case G is 3-transitive ([4, Theorem 2(a)]). Let A={e,/3, ~, 6} be an arbitrary set of 4 points of O. We first show that the global stabilizer Ga of A is transitive on A. There is a set S of at least 4 points such that Gz acts on Z as a 3-transitive group in which only the identity fixes 4 points ([4, Theorem 3, Corollary]). From the result in [3] it follows that each such group has a subgroup of order 4 having an orbit of length 4. Thus, G has a subgroup having an orbit o f length 4, and the claim follows from the 4-homogeneity of G. Since G is not 4-transitive, the restriction GAlA of Ga to A has order 4 or 12. G is 3-primitive, that is, G~p is primitive on ~-{~,r For assume that G~p splits f~-{cq/3} into a system of (n-2)/b blocks, each block having b > 1 points ([6, p. 12]). The images of this system under G form (2) block systems, one for each unordered pair of points of O. The number of ways of choosing an ordered pair {e',/3'}, {V', 6'} of pairs of distinct points of f2 so that V' and ~' lie in the same block of G~,~, is
(2) "(n-2)b-l'(b2) =n(n-1)(n-2)(b-1)/4" On the other hand, if c~',/8', ~' and ~' satisfy the above condition then so does
eachofthe (4) kimagesunderGoftheorderedpair{c~',~'},{7',6'}.Here k is the number of images of {c~',~'} under GA,, where A' ={e',/3', ~', 6'}; * Research supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 5*
68
W.M. KANTOR: 4-Homogeneous Groups
k = 2 or 6 according to whether I Ga'la,[ = 4 or 12. It follows that 2(:)
n(n-1)(n-2)(b-1)/4.
Together with the conditions 1 < b [(n - 2) and n > 8 this implies that b = n - 2, as claimed. If G~p had an involution interchanging ~ and 6 then Gala would contain an odd permutation, whereas GA]a is not $4. Thus, G~a has odd order and hence is solvable by the Feit-Thompson Theorem [2]. Since G~a is primitive on f 2 - { e , fl}, G,a has a characteristic elementary abelian subgroup N of order n - 2 which is transitive and regular on f 2 - { e , fl} ([6, Theorem 11.5]). G has an involution i interchanging c~ and fl and normalizing N. Since n is odd, i fixes exactly one point and hence centralizes no non-trivial element of N. Thus, i inverts N ([1, p.90]). In particular, distinct involutions having a common cycle of length 2 can have neither a second common cycle of length 2 nor a common fixed point. G, has precisely n - 2 involutions. Suppose that i = ( ~ fl)(7 6) .... The transitivity of GA[Aimplies that there is an element of the form j = ( ~ V)(fl 6) .... Since j2 has odd order there is even an involution i' =(a 7)(fl 6) .... As i is the only involution of the form (a fi)(7 6) ..., i'ii'=(~ fi)(~ 6) . . . . i and i and i' generate the only four group (that is, non-cyclic group of order 4) fixing A. Thus, each set of 4 points of ~2 is fixed by a unique four group, and each four group in G is uniquely determined by any of its ( n - 1 ) / 4 non-trivial orbits. Since every pair of distinct commuting involutions generates a four group, and each four group contains 3 such pairs, the total number of pairs of distinct commuting involutions of G is
3 (n4) { ( n - 1 ) / 4 } - l = n ( n - 2 ) ( n - 3 ) / 2 . As commuting involutions have the same fixed point, G~ contains ( n - 2 ) ( n - 3 ) / 2 pairs of distinct commuting involutions. The n - 2 involutions of G, thus generate an elementary abelian 2-subgroup of G, of order n - 1 , so that n - 2 is prime (see [5, p.334], for example). G,p[o_~,,~ is then a solvable, transitive permutation group of prime degree. Thus, G~p r ~ = 1 and the Theorem follows from [3] and [4, p.403]. References 1. BURNSIDE,W.: Theory of groups of finite order. Cambridge: University Press 1911.
2. FELT,W., and J.G. THOMPSON:Solvability of groups of odd order. Pacific J. Math. 13, 775-- 1029 (1963). 3. GORENSTmN,D., and D.R. HUGH~S:Triply transitive groups in which only the identity fixes four letters. Ill. J. Math. 5, 486--491 (1961). 4. LIVINGSTONE,D., and A. WAGNER:Transitivity of finite permutation groups on unordered sets. Math. Zeitschr. 90, 393--403 (1965). 5. SIERPINSKI,W.: Elementary theory of numbers. Warsaw: Monografje Matematyczne 1964. 6. WIELANDT,H. : Finite permutation groups. New York: Academic Press 1964.
Department of Mathematics, Universityof Wisconsin,Madison, Wis. 53706, U.S.A.