Concept of Toroidal Groups
1. The
The
the
of toroidal groups
general concept irrationality
Irrationality
The fund...
21 downloads
495 Views
6MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Concept of Toroidal Groups
1. The
The
the
of toroidal groups
general concept irrationality
Irrationality
The fundamental too]
complex
KoPFERMANN
by
Lie groups which
over a
pseudoconvexity
and
cohomology
groups.
and toroidal coordinates
are
by irrationality
fibre bundles
by
holomorphic functions and contributed basic properties of them.
KAZAMA continued the work with
of others
introduced in 1964
condition. MORIMOTO considered in 1965
lack non-constant
1.1
was
toroidal coordinates which allow to select toroidal groups out conditions. Toroidal groups
complex
torus group with
a
can
be
Stein fibre
represented
isomorphic
to
as
principal C'.
a
Toroidal groups The concept of complex
torus groups leads to
1.1.1 Definition
A toroidal group is
an
Abelian
complex
Lie group
on
which every
holomorphic
function is constant. Toroidal groups have several means
all
holomorphic
quasi-torus
simply
group of
a
as
(11,C)-proups,
quasi-torus'.
that
Sometimes
a
functions
are
constant is Abelian
unique connected and Abelian real Lie
complex
(Remark
Lie group
1.2.3
on
group of dimension
n
p
on
18).
which
connected and the Cn the unique connected and Abelian complex Lie
complex dimension
Also called Cousin p
constant,
or
theorem of MORIMOTO is that every
holomorphic
R' is the is
in literature such
are
is any connected Abelian Lie group.
A consequence of which all
names
functions
n
quasi-torus,
which is
simply
connected.
because COUSIN had
1)
Y.Abe, K. Kopfermann: LNM 1759, pp. 3 - 24, 2001 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001
an
example
of such
a
group
(see
Concept of Toroidal Groups
The
1.
4
Proposition Every connected Abelian complex 1.1.2
to Cn /A where A is
Lie group is
subgroup of
discrete
a
isomorphic
as
Lie group
complex
Cn.
Proof If such
a
covering
Lie group X has the
group with
Therefore A:= ker
projection -
7r
7r,
(X)
complex dimension Cn
7r :
is
discrete
a
n, then Cn is its universal
X which is
---
subgroup
complex homomorphism.
a
of Cn such that X
Cn/A.
-
Q.E.D. A lattice A C R' is
a
the Abelian
Lie group X
ordered set For
a
complex
matrix P
or
be the
the
(A,,
=
fx,Al
:=
-
complex rank of rank of
the coordinates
subspace of
a
Cn/A. A basis of a lattice A C Cn is A,) of R-independent Z-generators of A.
(A,,
+
-
-
-,
A,)
xrAr
+
an
let
xi E
:
basis P is said to be the lattice A C Cn is
a
of A
that the
R,
7
Xr E
RI
change
< n, then after
m
complex
of the coordinates
that Cn /A
so
Cn/Zn
=
rank of
complex
C-span CA
coordinates. If the
m
linear
a
Z-generators
-
,
we can assume
the first
n, then after
-
:=
of A.
R-span
complex
of R7n. A lattice A c Cn represents
subgroup
lattice A C Cn with basis
RA
The
discrete
:=
RA
lattice A. If
a
linear
+
iRA of A is the
change
and real rank of A C Cn
we can assume
-
a
(C/Z)n
that el,
C*n
-
-
-
-,
en
of
are are
by exponential
map
e(z) where C* is the If the
subgroup 7r :
CA
(exp(27rizi),
multiplicative
complex rank of A
of coordinates
Let
:=
el,
-
-
-
,
exp(27riZn))
group of the
C Cn is
get
-
-,
n
complex
and the real rank
en E
A and then A
r C Cn of real rank q. We say that A
Cn
=
we can
-
--,
RA
Cn/A iRA
be the natural
+
=
(z
E
Cn),
numbers. + q, then after
n =
Zn E) F with
n
+ q.
projection.
The maximal compact real
subgroup
of
Cn /A
is
=
the
RA/A
maximal real torus K:=
RA
7r(RA)
I MCA
change
discrete
Zn (D r has the rank
K
I
a
a
=
RA
n
iRA
RA. Then MCA n
RA/A,
that is the
projection of the real
RA of A. Moreover let MCA
MCA/(MCA
:=
:=
RA
n
Ko
becomes
complex subgroup
a
MCA/(MCA
n
A)
iRA be the maximal C-linear subspace of
n A is discrete in
A)
==
span
MCA so that the projection KO complex subgroup of Cn /A. KO is
of the maximal real torus K.
:=
7r(MCA)
=
the maximal
Irrationality
1.1
Proposition
1.1.3
Let A C C' be
If the
1.
discrete
a
complex
rank
subgroup.
m :=
rankCA
C'/A where A is considered Let
2.
5
and toroidal coordinates
rankCA
=
as a
RA/A,
maximal
RA
subgroup
n
of C'.
iRA be the maximal complex subspace
discrete
a
C*m ED
-_
is not dense in
A)
n
(Cn-m/r) of
subgroup
complex subgroup MCr/(MCF
Rr1r
torus
(C'/A)
then
Cn/A -when .1' -C Cn-?n is
than
complex subgroup MCA/(MCA
of RA- If the maximal
maximal real torus
=
n
Cn-,
-_
discrete
and MCA
n
.
integral
The
(A)
subgroup
(A,, -, A,) be a Cn' Then : Cn
where C E M (n', n;
T
group of X'.
covering
X'.
--+
CP
an
immersion and
injective and
complex
:=
basis of A' C
(injective)
an
is
momorphism
is
a
--
M
with
Lie
complex
GL(r, Z) =:
so
M'-'
subgroup
G
is
regular.
that
GL(r, Z).
of X'
=
Cn' /A',
iff the rank
(Cn).
Cn /A
Cn' /A'
--+
of toroidal groups
essentially
are
com-
plex homomorphisms. 1.1.9
Let
T:
Proposition C" /A' Cn /A --+
toroidal, Cn' /A' Cn /A,
any
be a holomorphic map with -r(I) 1, complex Abelian Lie group and where 1, 1' =
Cn' /A', respectively.
Then
T
is
a
where Cn /A is are
the units of
complex homomorphism.
Proof By path lifting theorem there
, (O)
=
0
so
that
T o 7r
=
any A E A the difference
Let A'
=
T(A).
Then
ir'
-?(z
o
exists
-?,
+
a
holomorphic
where 7r, 7r'
A)
-
-?(z)
are
Cn
map
the canonical
must be constant,
---
Cn'
with
projections.
namely i (A)
E
For
A.
, j (z for the components
A-periodic
A)
(j
of
j (z)
=
1,
=
-
-
-
,
(Z
Aj
+
T a
a
partial derivatives ak- j toroidal group. Then
describes the Stein
are
is
a
Q.E.D.
complex homomorphism.
following proposition
9
Cn)
E
Now the
n).
and therefore constant since Cn /A is
C-linear map and The
-j
+
toroidal coordinates
Irrationality and
1.1
factorization for toroidal
groups.
Proposition Cn' /A' any complex Abelian Lie group and Cn /A be toroidal, X' ---> X' a complex homomorphism. Then the image T(X) is a toroidal group.
1.1.10 Let X -r :
X
=
=
The connected component
(ker T),,
of the kernel of
induces
T
a
factorization
X
X1 (ker -r),,
X'
-
Proof '
: Cn
Let
Cn
_+
C' ,a C-linear
be the lift of
subspace and
discrete. The map -
:
X
The
Cn --+
___>
-r.
Then - is
C-linear, the image V :=, (Cn)
V n A' discrete in V. Therefore
Cn'
V/(V
induces
n -
(A))
a
-,
- (A)
C
c V n A' is
homomorphism
v/(v
n
A')
--+
X'
V/(V n A') c X' must be toroidal image -r(X) holomorphic functions. Moreover the map =
because X has
non-
constant
V/ (V is
a
covering
map and
n
X1 (ker -r),,
(A)) -_
--+
V/ (V
V/ (V n -
n
A) Q.E.D.
(A)).
Toroidal coordinates and C*n-q -fibre bundles
Standard coordinates
are
used in torus
theory whereas toroidal
coordinates
re-
spect the maximal complex subspace MCA of the R-span RA of the lattice A c Cn. 1.1.11
Standard coordinates
Let A C Cn be
a
discrete
subgroup of complex
rank
n
and real rank
change of the coordinates we obtain A R-independent Z-generators -/j, -lq E _V of F. Then
After
a
linear
=
P
=
(In, G)
Iq
0
T
0
In-q
T
n
Zn (D F with
+ q. a
set of
1. The
10
with unit In are
an
we
can
invertible
Groups
GL(n,C)
E
:=
R-independent, iff the
coordinates has
of Toroidal
Concept
assume
they
course
An immediate consequence of the
A basis P
(1)
(In, G)
:=
there exists
defines E
no a
('Y1i-)^1q)
:=
Thus, after matrix i of
that the square
imaginary part Imi .
coordinates of A. Of
and G
rank of ImG is q.
are
These coordinates
Zn\ f 01
M(n,q;C)
permutation of the
the first q
rows
of G
called standard
are
irrationality condition 1.1.4(2)
so
E
uniquely determined.
not
toroidal group, iff the
a
a
following
is:
condition holds:
that 'o-G E Zn.
(Irrationality
condition in standard
coordinates)
1.1.12 Toroidal coordinates
Toroidal coordinates where introduced GHERARDELLi and ANDREOTTI in KAZAMA refined them in in 1984
KOPFERMANN in 1964 and then
by
1971/74.
by
VOGT used them since 1981 and
slightly by transforming MCA
with
[64, 33, 115, 116, 53] Let P
be
G) i
=
of the last n
-
q
n
ones v
-
q
by
a
standard basis of A
of the first q
square matrix
After
:=
:=
(u, v
-Jmt)(Imi )-'
changing
:=
change
the first q coordinates
+
E
Ri u)
M(n
-
(u q, q;
Cq, V
E
R).
C
u
and the last
(
(1q, t)
Iq t
0
In-q R, R2
In-
0
M(q, 2q; C) is the basis R := (Ri, R2) E M(n
E
T. The real matrix
-
of q,
Cn-q)
We get toroidal coordinates.
the order of the vectors the basis of the
P
where B
imaginary part of of the invertible, and let i be the matrix
the shear transformation
l(u, v) where R,
rows
of G. Then
rows
that the
so
of G is
a
q
given lattice becomes
B) R
q-dimensional complex
2q; R)
is the so-called
torus
glueing
matrix. The lattice becomes 0
A
=
(Zn-q)
Toroidal coordinates have the 1-
MCA
=
dinates,
JZ
E Cn
:
Zq+1
(D rwithbasis
(B)
of r.
R
following properties: Zn
=
01
is the
subspace of
the first q
coor-
1.1
2.
RA real
3. Cn
E Cn
fZ
:IMZq+l subspace generated by
-::::
z:::
ED V ED iV
MCA
Of course toroidal coordinates groups have many
We
if
same as
Of
::--:
q units eq+1
MCA
:=
not in the least
the order of the basis 0
a
basis of the
The
toroidal
That is
(u
periods
by
Cq, v
E
Cn-q).
E
obtain
we
0
B,
=
and B2
torus T
same
advantage
-
( In-q B2) ( In-q B)
(Imt) -'
B,
A,
uniquely determined,
R
R, R2
now
is the
V, where V
complex subspace MCA with
((Imt)-lu, v + Rju)
P=
where
ED
en E
I
transform the standard coordinates
we
changing
-:::
symmetries.
l(u, v) After
n
-
11
iV-
are
transform the maximal
can
the
the
RA
=
In1Zn
:--
*
and toroidal coordinates
Irrationality
as
:=
(Imfl 'Ret + i1q.
before and R
the
(RI, R2)
:=
(BI, B2)
Then B same
glueing
is
matrix.
of these toroidal coordinates with refined transformation from
standard coordinates is
I(Im-yj)
(t)
for the basis 71,
=
(j
ej
=
q)andl(ej)
1,
(1)
on
the
there exists
glueing
no a
E
the torus T
1.1.13 Real
=
toroidal group, iff the
a
condition in toroidal
depends only
on
the
glueing
,
I
,
*
parametrizations a simple real parametrization of
7
An be the first and
complete the
basis
following
by -yj
71,
'
coordinates) matrix R and
B.
generated by
Toroidal coordinates allow
A,
n)
q +
such that 'o-R E Z2q.
Zn-q\ 101
It is to remark that this condition on
(j
matrix R holds:
(Irrationality
not
ej
*,'lq Of F-
''
In toroidal coordinates the lattice A defines
condition
=
*
iej (j
*
Cn /A. For this let
the last q elements of P so that we can i 'Yq 2n Then = + 1, n) to a R-basis of the R q .
the R-linear map n
(L)
z
L (t)
(Aj tj
+ 7j tn+j)
(t
E R
2n)
j=1
induces
a
(R/Z )n+q.
real Lie group
isomorphism
L
:
T
x
Rn-q
__ ,
Cn /A, where T
12
If
1.
The
Concept of Toroidal Groups
denote with
we
u
the first q toroidal coordinates and with
ones, then the real toroidal coordinates
change
of the real parameters t1 i
(- R)
*
*
*
)
LR(t)
Reu, Imu, Rev, Imv
are
n
-
given after
q a
t2,, by
At
--::::
the last
v
(t
E R
2n)
with
Iq ReS ImT
0
0
0
0
0
(Imi )-' Jmt)-'Ret
0
0
Iq
0
0
R,
R2
In-q
0
0
0
0
In-q
0
0
In-q
A
or
R, R2 In-q 0
0
In the second
0
case we
get real toroidal -coordinates- as- given- by -reftned-transfor-
mation from standard coordinates. In both
first
+ q real t-variables become
n
1.1.14 C*n-q -fibre bundles
Toroidal coordinates define rank
n
+ q
subspace
as
a
over a
torus
representation of
C*n-q -fibre bundle. The
that the
:-=
MCA/BZ2q
-4
any toroidal group Cn /A with
projection 13
MCA of the first q variables induces
onto the torus T
functions Zn+q -periodic in the
A-periodic.
P:X=Cn /A
so
cases
T
a
:
Cn
-4
MCA
onto the
complex homomorphism
MCA/BZ2q
=
with kernel
Cn-q/Zn-q
-
C*n-q closed in X
diagram Cn
MCA
IX/
lir
X
T
becomes commutative. It is well known that every closed
defines
a
[105, 7.4] Thus,
principal fibre bundle or
as an
HIRZEBRUCH
Cn /A with A
a
with base space
XIN
N of
and fibre N
a
Lie group X
(see
STEENROD
[45, 3.4]).
immediate consequence of toroidal coordinates every Lie group X =
Zn ED F of rank
complex q-dimensional Such
complex Lie subgroup
bundle is defined
cocycle condition
a,+,,
n
torus T
by
(z)
an
=
+ q is
as
a
automorphic factor
a,,
(z
C*n-q -fibre bundle
principal
over
the
BZ2q), fulfilling 7, 7-' E BZ2q).
the
base space.
+
T) a, (z)
(z
a,
E
(,r
E
MCA)
Irrationality and toroidal
1.1
coordinates
13
1.1.15 Lemma
Let X
Cn /A be of rank
=-
+ q and let A in toroidal coordinates be
n
Z-generated
by
with the basis B
MCA/BZ2q Then the
morphic
and the
e
=
-
group T
torus
-
C*n-q -fibre bundle X __P+ T is
principal
e(rk)
a,
the
M(q, 2q; C) of the (rl, -, r2q) E M(n
E
matrix R
glueing
R
-
2q; R).
q,
given by the
constant auto-
factor
H where
T2q)
(TI,
=
B
In%
P
C*n-q is the
Rn-q
:
The bundle is
I-sphere.
C C*n-q
(Sl)n-q
E
(k
map and
exponential
2q),
1,
=
Jz
S,
JzJ
E C:
=
11
trivial.
topologically
Proof Let
u
Cn
=
projection
Then
L:
we
get
The
=
v,
of the
MCA/BZ2q
T
=
7r*X
=
J(Ui X)
E
Cn-q the last
E
v
pullback
--+
MCA
n
q variables of the
-
bundle X 4 T
principal
along
the
is
MCA
7r(U)
X:
X
=
P(X)J
trivialization
a
MCA
--+
.
X
C*n-q
E Cn-q is any
v
Indeed,
ED Cn-q
ir:
7r*X
where
q and
MCA be the first
E
MCA
with
v
(u)
c
V
mod Zn-q iff
V2
L(u, x)
by
(u, e(v))
:=
(U
MCA,
E
x
E
X),
7r'- I (x) by
(U) (U)
mod A
=
so
that
t
becomes
bundle
a
V2
V1
isomorphism. Now let
(u)
E
V
T
=
i'_1(x)t 0
where aBor
Let
phic
Ba
period with
a
Instead of
(u)
a a
E
we can
Z2q Define T(u, x) -
(v+Ra) u+Ba
take
a
V
T(U, X)
=
(u
Ba, e(v
+
+
Ro-))
=
e(Ra) acts componentwise. Therefore e(Ra) (0- EE Zn) defines X _P_+ T.
(u
+
c
:=
i`
1
(u
(x)
Ba, e(Ro-)
the constant
o
+ T, so
x)
for any
that
e(v))
automorphic
factor
:=
Lj
be the
topologically
trivial line bundle
Lj
T defined
by the
automor-
factor
aj(Tk) where R
logically
=
(rik)
trivial
E
M(n
sum
L
=
-
q,
L,
=
e(rjk)
2q; R) (D
...
(D
(k
=
1,
2q)
is the
given glueing
Ln-q
is
a
matrix. Then the topo-
vector bundle L
TZ' T,
defined
by
the to
Concept of Toroidal Groups
1. The
14
factor
automorphic
a
diag(al,
=
-
-
-,
a,,-q)
E
GL(n
-
q;
C)
and associated
the given bundle X -P-+ T which is then topologically trivial.
If the line bundles
product L,,, defined
L'
on
an
automorphic factor
If
T :
Cn /A
Cn'/A'
Cn/A
by aX,,3,x, respectively, defined by the product a,\,3), (A E A). If a
is
Lp
defined
are
by
A).
(A
E
0
L, Lp
Cn'/A'
--+
is
then the tensor line bundle L is
aX, then the dual bundle L* is defined
defined
by
a-'
line bundle
complex homomorphism and the
a
by the autmorphic factor ax,, then defined by the automorphic factor ax := - *a.' (A)
is
Q.E.D.
pullback r*L'
the
on
T
1. 1. 16 Remark
Let X=Cn /A bundle
over a
defined
by
as
in the
previous lemma
torus T and
the
Lj
automorphic
Then X is
=
M(n
E
-
q,
represented
previous proof
as
natural C*n-q-fibre
be the line bundle
Lj P4
T
e(rjk)
=
2q; R)
(k
is the
=
2q)
1,
matrix.
given glueing
get by the irrationality condition (I) for toroidal groups:
we
a
(rik)
as
be
factor
aj(Tk) where R
in the
toroidal group, iff for all
o-
\ 101
G Zn-q
the
trivial line
topologically
bundle n-q
n-q
L'
11c)
L Oaj
a'(Tk)
givenby
=
e(E ujrjk)
is not
analytically
(Irrationality
trivial.
Maximal Stein We have
seen
C*n-q
closed
as
2q)
(k
j=1
j=1
subgroups
that every group X
subgroup.
=:
We shall
condition for line
of toroidal groups
Cn /Awith A= Zler of
see
bundles)
that the dimension
n
-
rankn+q
has
q is maximal for
toroidal groups.
SERRE fibre
conjectured
are
proved
in 1953 that
Stein manifolds is
in 1960 that
a
complex
a
complex analytic fibre
Stein manifold
[100].
are
X is
a
Stein
manifold, if
Stein manifolds and its structure group G is
Lie group. A
space B and structure group G
space whose base and
MATSUSHIMA and MORIMOTO
complex analytic fibre bundle
base space B and fibre F
connected
a
principal
are
bundle is
connected
a
Stein
complex Stein
a
manifold, if base groups.
[70]
1.1
1.1.17
Let X
Irrationality and toroidal coordinates
15
Proposition
C'/A
=
be
a
toroidal group of rank
1. For every closed Stein 2. If N C X is
a
subgroup N
=-
n
C
+ q. Then: x
C`
have 2f +
we
maximal closed Stein subgroup, then
XIN
is
a
0.
1.2 Toroidal
Every complex
Lie group has
q of the group. Such a
maximal torus
and
subgroups
a
maximal toroidal
a
group is
exactly (n
an a
n-dimensional connected
period
group
and the rank of
Pf
=
is the closed
of
tion of the
tively,
complex Lie
group
group. Then p E X is
a
left
forallx E X.
complex subgroup
of all left
periods of f
is
f
group of all
:= n
-
meromorphic
or
groups of all functions
period
contained in
are
X if
dim
The function f is non-degenerate, if rankf totally degenerate, if f is constant.
period
a
complex Lie
on
f (X)
rankf
The
Some toroidal groups have
sets of toroidal groups
subgroup
meromorphic function f
f (px) The
which determines the type
subgroups.
The maximal toroidal
Let X be
subgroup
q)-complete.
-
subgroup. Compact analytic
translations of these torus
period of
pseudoconvexity
Pf. =
n
otherwise
degenerate
and
holomorphic functions is the intersecor holomorphic, respec-
meromorphic
X.
on
The type is
an
important invariant of complex Lie
groups.
First,
we
give the
definition of the type for toroidal groups, which also holds for any connected Abelian complex Lie group. 1.2.1 Definition
A toroidal group X
MCA of the real For
a
span
=
Cn /A is of
type
q, if the maximal
RA has the complex dimension
toroidal group X
==
Cn /A with A
=
complex subspace
q.
Zn ED.V the type is the real rank q of
the lattice F. It is well known that
a
complex
Lie group X is
a
Stein group under
conditions:
a) b)
X is
holomorphically separable.
X has at every
MORIMOTO
[74] proved
1.2.2 Theorem
Let X be
a
point local coordinates given by global functions. in 1965:
(Holomorphic reduction) (MORIMOTO)
connected complex Lie group with unit 1, and let
one
of the
1.2 Toroidal
X0
:=
Ja
G X
f (a)
:
be the constant set of all 1. 2.
for all
f (1)
pseudoconvexity
holomorphic functions
f in
17
XI
holomorphic functions. Then:
X0
is the
X0
is the smallest closed normal
group of all
period
and
subgroups
holomorphic functions.
complex subgroup
X1X0
such that
is
a
Stein group. 3. 4.
toroidal
subgroup contained in the center of X. Every complex homomorphism 0 : X -+ Y into a Stein group Y can be split as 0 0 o 7r with the natural projection 7r : X --+ X1X0 and a complex homomorphism 0 : X1X0 -- Y of Stein groups. X0 is
a
=
X0 is called the maximal toroidal subgroup of X and
X1X0
the
holomorphic reduction of
X.
X is said to be of type q, if its maximal toroidal
is of
subgroup X0
type q.
Proof
a)
X0 is closed in morphic functions. Xo is
a
subgroup
X0 is the intersection of the period groups of all holo-
X:
of X: For
a
C X
and
holomorphic f
the functions
f-(x) := f(x-1) (x E X) are holomorphic. f(ab) fa(b) fa(l) f(a) f(l) and f(a-1) and
=
such that
=
ab, a-'
=
E
=
For
=
a,b
f_(a)
fa(x)
:=
X0
E
f-(I)
=
f (ax) get
we =
f(I)
Xo.
a complex subgroup of X: Let X0 and X be the Lie algebras of X0, X, respectively. We want to prove that X0 is a complex subalgebra of X. Let U E Xo
Xo is
and V
:=
W E X. Moreover let exp sU be the map which maps
1-parameter subgroup
0(s in
certain connected
a
For
holomorphic fo (s) fo (0) and a
=
for all t E R
X0 is
so
E R
s
on
a
of X with tangent U at 1. Then define
it)
+
:=
of 0 E C.
neighborhood
function then
f
fo (z)
that V E
:
X
=
exp(sU) exp(tV)
C let
fo := f o 0. Now exp sU fo (0) locally around 0 E C. Then -4
E
X0
so
that
exp tV E
X0
Xo.
characteristic
subgroup of X: For a E AutX and a holomorphic function f holomorphic function f (x) : f (a (x)) (x E X). For a E X0 we f '(a) f '(1) get f (o-(a)) f (1) so that a(a) C- Xo. X0 is the period group of all holomorphic functions: Suppose f (px) f (x) (x E X) for a fixed p E X and all holomorphic functions f Then f (p) f (1) so that the other hand On let all for E Then X0. f (p) f (1) f. p f (px) f (xx-'px) f,, (x-lpx) fx (1) f (1) (x E X), hence p is a period for all holomorphic we
a
define the =
'
=
=
=
=
=
.
=
=
=
=
=
functions.
b) X1X0 is a Stein group: As we mentioned before it X1X0 is holomorphically separable. By the definition
is sufficient to show that
of X0
we can
define the
1.
18
natural
Concept of Toroidal Groups
The
homomorphism
W
W(f ) 7r 7r(a) and L
R (XlXo) with
'H (X)
:
for
f
o
f
E
R (X),
7r(b) be distinct X1X0 is the projection. Let -d such that there exists Then E f (a-'b) :A f (1) for f H(X) X1X0. The a-'b Y separates -a and L. Xo. We set 1:= p(fi) E H(XlXo). X0 is the smallest closed and normal complex subgroup of X, such that X1X0 is a Stein group: Let N be a closed and normal subgroup of X such that XIN is a Stein group. Take a G X \ N. Moreover let f E H (XIN) such that f (ir (a)) =A 7r separates a XIN. Then f := f f (ir(l)) with natural projection 7r : X where
7r :
X
=
--4
elements of
*
*
*
*
o
-+
and 1. Hence
X0,
a
XOO
X0 is connected: Let 1. Then
X00
so
C N.
Xo
be the connected component of X0
XIXOO
is normal in X and
a
group of
covering
containing the
X1X0. By
a
unit
result of
XOO is connected. Stein, XIXOO is a Stein group. Then Xo C XOO, therefore Xo On X0 all holomorphic functions are constant: Let X00 C X0 be the constant set of 1 of all functions holomorphic in X0. Then X00 is closed and normal in X0. So =
X1X0
and
X01X00
be considered
can
Stein groups. So
X0
is
XIXOO
p 14
functions
on
Stein groups and
are
by are
(X/Xoo)/(Xo/Xoo). XlXoo
-
hence
X00,
X00
adjoint representation Ad
:
X
--+
GL(X)
algebra of
of X is
a
Lie
the kernel is the center Z of X. It is well known that
X1Z
subgroup
c)
Let
is Stein.
such that
0:
X
group Y and is
X1X0
Y be
Xo
C
kero.
X0. All holomorphic
a
C X
is
a
But then
0
a
complex
be the maximal toroidal
0
image of the
GL(X)
a
GL(Y)
subgroup
of
is
and
Stein group.
Stein group. Then X0 C Z.
homomorphism of
=
X. The
is the smallest closed and normal
By the previous result X0
connected and Abelian complex
a
X0
--+
=
on
constant.
is in the center Z of X: Let X be the Lie
Thus
are
the mentioned result of MATSUSHIMA and MORIMOTO
Stein group. Then X0 C
a
X0
XlXo
fibre bundle whose base space and fibre
principle
a
as
o 7r
subgroup
XlXo
with
0
only
constant
:
Lie group X into
subgroup
of X. Then
of Y and then toroidal --+
a
Stein
O(Xo) so
that
Q.E.D.
Y.
1. 2.3 Remark
Every complex
Lie group with
and connected and therefore
a
Every compact and connected complex
For
a
connected
complex Lie group
compact subgroup
subalgebra
with Lie
algebra
of 1C. Then there exists
a
Lie groups
X with Lie
is Abelian
Cn/A.
Lie group is
holomorphic function rings of complex
The
holomorphic functions
toroidal group
torus.
are
Algebra X
those of Stein groups.
let K be
a
maximal real
1C. Moreover let ICO be the maximal a
uniquely
defined
complex complex subgroup Ko of
K associated with
/Co which is independent of the choice of K [75]. We get the
following diagram
in which
case.
The lattice A in the
general and behind diagram gives always a toroidal group. we
note first the
the Abelian
1.2 Toroidal
subgroups
Lie group
group of dim
max.
C
X
n
'`
'
Abelian
X
Ct+-+no
I
I
XO
19
algebra
general
I CnO
X0
of dim no
a
X
pseudoconvexity
toroidal
subgroup
re
C-
X
I
I
Lie
Abelian
general
and
su
'
bg
v _c
/A
CA /A
/C + ir,
X0
Cno
RA + MA
=
t
roup
K
RA/A
Ko
MCA/(MCAnA)
of real dim no+ q
complex subgroup
RA
max.
of dim q
The maximal toroidal
ICO=Knir,
subgroup X0 and
the
MCA=RAniRA
type
q of
a
Lie group X
Another immediate consequence of the previous theorem is the 1.2.4 Lemma
Let X be
a
connected
Lie group with the maximal toroidal
complex
X0. Then X is holomorphically
convex, iff
subgroup
X0 is compact.
Proof If X0 is not compact let
>-.
fal
is
X0 is
-
and
the Fourier
We have to show that
converges
toroidal
refined
back from
changing
after
that
remember 1.13
real
fix
a
>
E}.
E
> 0
and define
Then
E I sy, I
I (a, Imyj) I I e ((a,
))
-yj,,
-
11
-
1
V
,s
obviously
is
1,
0,
-
-
-
,
q)
for
convergent
k E
every
Rn>0
because
I (a,
the
Now define
j(j)<E The map
x
:=
--+
jor
exp
Zn
Ej
x
(x
E
0
0.
127r (o-,
Im
constant
Therefore
- j) I I e ((o-,
-
11
0
constant
d > 0
EZq with inf
7-E zq
We can choose
Of
(TT)
condition UN
a
(a
-4.
+
A')
bilinear
The restricted
characteristic
(z
+ ax,
and
Alrxr
=
,
Then
=
ax,
alternating 0, iff the
(z
A
+
=
A)
+ ax
we
=
(X'Y" -Y)
get for the extended
bilinear
(z).
0.
commutation
property
homomorphism Xjr
(X,Y ly') holds.
(z)
(-j' -Y' form
G
F)
for
the
restricted
A(A, A') If
we
X,y
take
-y
=
(-y
E
F).
0
=
If X
4>-5. a.y
(z)
-/'
and m'
0, then L
=
sy
=
(XI, m')
=
(z)
dy (7
E F be
G
Let
given by E
F)
homomorphism
a
:F
A
unit
=
on
m+
vector
exponential
-y,
toroidal
groups
A'
+ -Y
39
1 .
n),
ej
we see
system
y'
mod Z
c,, + cy,
c,,+,y,
E
-P)
+
+
mlc-yl
mqc-y ,
R with
F)
mod Z
c,,
=
bundles
Then
:=
--+
a,y
all
with
6ml,yl+***+Mq'Yq defines
for
the
basis.
a
Line
with
ej
m=
-
is
+ cy + i
(Xy,, m)
-
2.1
changing the F-reduced auby .y without c., can be substituted i L. Then factor + + defining tomorphic d-, is a F-reduced automorphic 6,y s., summand aX (A E A) definsummand which can be extended to an automorphic so
that
ing
L.
the
5 -L
As
there
exists
have
we
seen
a
h(z
(Uj)jEj
let
For that
projection
7r
C'
:
be
h
:
+
A)
a
h(z)
-
we
7r
enough
is
it
show that
to
C with
--+
=
finite
locally
C'/A
--+
C'
proof
of the
beginning
the
at
continuous
(A
ax(z)
E
A).
of X
covering
C'1A
=
such that
with
have
-1
U (Vj
(Uj)
A),
+
AEA
Vj
where
Moreover of units
A)
+A
(A
E
let
-rj
:=
are
belonging
we
define
that
(A
E
by cocycle
A)
is
Uj
--+
and
Vj (j
: 0, supppj
the continuous
a
h3-
C
C'
pj(u)ax(-rj(u))
hj(z) Now a,\
:
7r
J)
E
:
Vj
and
+A
-4
Jpj
:
Uj j
E
biholomorphic.
is
J1
be
a
partition
(Uj)jEJ:
to
pj
Then
disjoint
pairwise
(7rJVj)-1
0
summand of
condition
Uj
-+
and
C
pj
=
1.
by
for
z
=
-rj(u)
+ A
elsewhere.
automorphy
and
z
-
rj
(u)
E A
a
period
so
40
Line
2.
hj (z
covering
The
h(z
it)
+
+
tt)
and
Bundles
hj (z)
-
Cohomology
hj [Tj (u)
=
+
=
pj
(u)az-,j
=
pj
=
pj
(u) (u)
(z
(u)+,,
a,,
(,rj (u)
a,,
(z).
+
(Uj)jEJ is locally finite. h(z) a,, (z) (ti E A).
Picard
the
hj [-rj (u)
-
pj
-
7j
-
With
(u)az-,j
(z
+
(u))]
-rj
-
(Tj (u))
(u)
(u))
hj
h
continuous
get finally
we
Q.E.D.
of cobordant
The characteristic
automorphic
system of
bundle
line
bundle
theta
of
L
on
L,9 and
a
A line
bundle
T,, (x)
x
+a
L
on
X
(x
E
X)
=
trivial
is
=
implies by
defined
C'1A
line
La
=
to
that
an
every
exponential
by
an
expo-
To
bundle
this
see
homogeneous
the translated
is the
bundle
product
tensor
of
a
Lo
Lo.
(9
unique.
is not
CI/A
X
group
topologically
a
decomposition
this
factor
factor,
isomorphic
is
summands.
116])
toroidal
L
general
automorphic
theta
a
bundles,
automorphic
an
of
(VOGT [115,
Theorem
2.1.10
Every
line
and an automorphic defined polynomials, factor, a wild automorphic summand. So we get the
system of linear nential
trivial
product
is the
Pic(X),
F-reduced
decomposition
factor
C
topologically
of
group
of classes
the group
Ta* L
on
is
X,
we
define:
if for
translation
every
holomorphically
isomorphic
L. Remark
2.1.11 Let A
=
z, (Dr and L
factor
ay conditions
2.
The ay The ay
3.
The
1.
(-y
E
are
P)
a:
r
--+
a
line
bundle
E C
P) r) (,y
the line
are
constant.
can
be substituted
E
X
C'
=
/A.
For a.P-reduced
system
a.,
(-y
E
automorphic
V)
following
the
by
a
homomorphism
a: r
is
a
homomorphism
a:
C without
r). factor
bundle
(,y
a., L
can
E
r)
be defined
by
the
r
representation
C*. a:
r
--+
C
C*.
Proof Indeed, we have to see only 1 >proof of Lemma2.1.9. Because and
on
exponential
of L with
equivalent:
changing a., automorphic
Wesay that or
z
it]
=
-
Pico(X)
to
+
subgroup
The
In
(u)) (Tj (u)) rj
-
2. But this
a-,
=
can
cy + i
d-,
be done in the
with
same
way
homomorphism d
as :
r
in the --+
R
-yl,
the desired
the
bundle
[116].
iff
given by
is
F)
by c.,
E
r)
bundle
is
homogeneous,
every
line
d-t (,y
+ i
a
line that
assumption
becomes
ABE proved
1989 that
in
a
in any
case
iff
a
basis
topologically
is
it
Cn/A
=
bundle
line
a
on
homomorphism with Q.E.D.
X
on
cy,,
......
is
a
theta
homogeneous
is
[3].
representation
a
bundle
41
groups
Theorem
2.1.12
For
,y
:=
1982 that
in
under
it
6,.y
that
so
E
property.
VOGTproved
trivial
homomorphism Z-generated
the
as
7q of F
-,
-
a.,
take
we can
toroidal
on
(-y, -y'
mod Z
cy + c,,,
=-
c.y+..y,
bundles
Line
2.1
bundle
line
a
L
on a
1.
L is
homogeneous.
2.
L is
a
3.
L
topologically
following
the
group
trivial
by
be defined
can
toroidal
statements
equivalent:
are
bundle.
theta
representation.
a
Proof Let
A= Zner.
a,*y (z) T:,*: L phic
=
(z
a.,
factors
(z)
This
+
and this
is
s.,
(z
Now as in
means
(xy, x)
+ s.,
equivalent +
x)
proof
x)
(z
+
x)
+
(Xy, x)
s.y
Such
a
(z
+
x)
(z)
-
s.,
decomposition
Z'-periodic
s,,
(z)
+
x)
defining
the
a
=-
(z)
+
is
(z
-= -r.
there
(z)
e(,rx)
-
s.,
(z).
F-reduced
where
-rx,
automor-
C'
:
---+
(z
7-,
+
-y)
+ a.,
(z)
-
-r,,
(z)
mod Z,
=
+
-y)
exists
(m., z)
-
a
-r,,
(z)
E
F).
decomposition
unique
+ q.
(,y
mod Z
(z)
qx such that
Z'-periodic
(Xy, x)
unique
(Xy, x) and
-
of the theorem
and
mx E Z'
iff
L,
to
(z
+ s.,
that
,r.
with
(Xj, x)
+
system
to
sy
-
(z)
a-,
=
with
cobordant
are
holomorphic.
+
isomorphic
holomorphically
is
a.y
:
by the exponential
T*L is defined
bundle
The translated
1>-2.
=-
so
=-
(mx, ^j)
that
(m, -y)
we
+ q,
(z
+
y)
-
get
mod Z
(y
E
F)
q,
(z)
mod Z.
C is
42
Bundles
Line
2.
sy
sy(z
Then Let
+
x)
On toroidal
x)
+
(z)
sy
-
strictly
are
=
(z
qx
+
-y)
(z).
q,,
-
cobordant.
(*)
(x,y, x)
=-
(m, 7)
(m, -y)
-=
(n, -y)
groups
because of the
m= n
(z
and sy
consider
us
Cohomology
and
irrationality
(-Y
mod Z
(-y
mod Z
F).
G
r)
E
for
m,
implies
E Zn
n
condition.
So the map Cn 3
by (*) becomes Let
a
with
0
0, but
lp(') I V
or !0'0'00
because
be convergent,
must
In the
convergent.
way
same
cEZ'\101
of the
part
same
we can
jp(') I
1:
of
see
43
groups
V
for
series
the other
that
toroidal
on
parts
absolutely
q__ is
are
for
convergent
So
< 0.
o-j
some
the
bundles
Line
2.1
p(')
P(X)
e
((a, x))
OIEZ'\101
defines
Fourier
convergent
a
everywhere. Finally condition
(**)
series
implies
(x)
s,, With
(-I)
q.,
& + -y)
=
q(-I)
-
s,,(x) 2>-3. then
L,
X
=
If
In
qx
q(x
only
toroidal
a
of a
factor
is
get
q(x)
-
dy (,y
E
r)
is
bundle.
theta
a
theta
constant.
of
a
bundle
against
line
and
bundle a
the
representation,
a
bundle the
By
exponential implies Q.E.D.
decomposition
characteristic
the
a^, is invariant
homogeneous
X
group
we
have to
difference
a
we
representation.
translations. L
on
topologically
a
toroidal
trivial
group
line
into
bundle
is
bundle.
line
CI/A
=
Pic(X)/Pico(X)
:=
A
with
(z)
=
identify
Cn/A
defines with
A
=
(x-y, z) those
=
a
+
subgroup.
-
2
(X'Y
who differ
(X-Y, Z)
1 +
-
2
=
Z'
,
Y) by
(X'Y' -/)
ED r
+ C'y a
can
be
represented
+
'Y
Zn E) r C
(,y
E
by
expo-
-P), But for
representation.
and vice
representation
NS(X) is
(0).
q(-I)
-
+ i
c.,
:=
But then
theta
a
&Y (Z)
=
sy(O)
qx
-
q(x)
=
+
a.,
a
holomorphic
systems
where
X
must be
group
a-,
the
7)
decomposition
the
up to
by
NS(X) nential
(0)
+ sy
qx(0)
that
that
so
The N6ron-Severi
of
(y)
+
p(x) -p(O)
0
=
automorphic
r)
E
product
tensor
unique
L is defined
(,y
0
=
consequence,
the
=
and
so
must be constant.
0, sy
=
0
=
defining
the
system a,, X
0 and s-,
remark
previous 3>-1.
z
=
to zero. The line bundle must be s,, (y E r) is cobordant trivial If the exponential system a., defines a topologically
that
so
=
for
q(x)
that
so
Hom(F, Zn)
(,y versa.
E
any other
F)
So for
toroidal
groups
Cohomology
2.2
cohomology
The Dolbeault toroidal
theta
topology.
with
those
comparable
is
A toroidal
line
every
the
X
group
X is
on
In
cohomology groups
have differential
groups
of torus
of toroidal
only
groups
wild
for
have
groups
cohomologous
forms not
and wild
theta
is lineatizable.
bundle
groups
general
In the
case
we
define:
Definition
2.2.1
L
the
coefficients.
constant
torus
a
with
cohomology
wild
Toroidal
Toroidal
Over
groups
The Dolbeault
groups.
non-Hausdorff to
of toroidal
a
about
section
proved that automorphy
Cn /A is
=
bundle
theta
Lemma2.1.9
to
know that
we
group,
wild
iff
line
every
bundle
group.
line bundles trivial we topologically theta bundle, iff every summand of 2.1.6 and constants. By the results of Proposition iff some special conditions hold. So we this is true,
bundle
cobordant
is
theta
toroidal
a
bundles
theta
line
every
toroidal
a
otherwise
L
and
X is
on
a
get the
(VOGT)
Theorem
2.2.2
For any toroidal
X
group
=
Cn /A of type
following
q the
statements
are
equiv-
alent: theta
1.
X is
2.
Every summand of automorphy
3.
For any basis
a
group.
real
positive
G
=
yq)
......
r
1
toroidal
(a
group
Zn-q\ 101). coordinates)
toroidal theta
and type
toroidal
E
group
groups
q with
of type
of dimension
as
0 < q
0
01,
and define
=
1(6N, a)
E Z
the first
n
-
q
prime
log P,,,).
3-1] guarantees
pi
m :=
+
-
-
-
the existence
of
a
real
+ am log pmI > S-'-
with S:= 2max 11,T1, If If
17J-r
+ +
(a, a) I (a, a)j
>
2.
prove.
11all 11all
with
maximum
norm.
46
If
2
2(1
J,r
Jrj + +
Bundles
Line
2.
S,
we can
especially
S
then
m) ljo-11 11all
for
and
Cohomology
2
=
because 2
Ilo-11 11all
ljo-11'
k,,, find
otherwise
sufficiently
a
In the
=
case
pl,
am
of toroidal
wild si
with
m:= n
1
2 I-rj so (m > 1).
that
k,,,
[2(1
N c N
so
:=
that
in
N"
any
(*)
With
+
we
(x -> 1),
:=
=
(o-, a) I
+
log
> N-
pm must be
groups
(W)
1, sj,+i
:=
we
107 1.
independent.
Q-1inearly with
start
strictly
(A
jLm2`11
>
monotone sequence
1)
q and define
-
00
a,
aj
2s,,
aji
:=
U
M))
am).
(a,,
a :=
By N
(2 SN)-?,
07NJ
U
2N
TN'j
=
1......
M)
TN:=ETN,ji
0`N:=(0`N,1C'*)0`N,m)7
j=1 we
get "0
0 < a,UN,l
-
E
TNJ
2 SN-Sp
-
case
jo-1
x :=
log
=
'.
where
big
J,r Then a,
jo-j-'-
! km
S
2logp,.,,
=
2Nx (x
>
9)
so
-
that
M22MSN-SN+I+l
7-N
for
M222MSN-SN+l
1).
of toroidal
Cohomology
2.2
47
groups
and then
(a; UN)
(**)
because of
Finally
TN
-
we
I
N. So after
__
0
groups
Sm,P)
-Em,P+'(X)) of"&-exact
of
-5-closed
C"O
and the
(m,p)-forms
on
204; GRAUERT-FRITZSCHE] there
48
Bundles
Line
2.
Cohomology
and
H',P(X) Nch cohomology.
to
For
X
groups
forms
w
1).
50
Line
2.
Let
I
For
a
I
g,,
be
Bundles
a
Cohomology
and
to the covering unity subordinate Z' (V, we put
of
partition
I
cocycle
U"' I of T.
U
G
E 011*r(XW-C. ',
W:=
9010011***Clk-1
C, "
...
W.
-
Ci
E Ck-1(V,.F',P) fgct0cj1,**cjk_jj MOCZ1**'ak } because I f,,0 c,,...o,, } is This and (Y) proves the theorem.
Then
For the next
step
(m, p)-forms
Two
We want to show that
5-cohomologous
to
5-closed
consider
a
bfg,oal
and
...
=
0
ak-l} (k > 1). Q.E.D.
5-cohomologous,
are
cochain
a
Hence Hk (V,.FM,P)
VOGT[117].
follow
we
becomes
cocycle.
a
with
difference
their
(m,p)-form
0-closed
every
form
iff
on
coefficients.
constant
a
is
-6-exact.
toroidal
For that
theta it
is
group
is sufficient
to
(0, p)-forms.
with
Indeed,
E Fjjdzr
A
d-zj
dzr
Fjjdz-j)
A
ij
Ej Fjjdz-j
all Let
u
are
be the first
5-closed. q und
the last
v
from standard
formation
n
-
coordinates
where B of
=
LR(t)
=
1.1.13
(LR),
(t
At
E
B,
with
T and R
torus
a
(BI, B2)
=
R2n)
(Imt)
=
(RI, R2) of the
lint -R,ImT
is
Cn/A
be
a
toroidal
5-cohomologous
and ReB2
=
(Imt)
Ret
We get
matrix.
a
is the
basis
parametrization
(Reu, Imu, Rev, lmv) according
0
0
Iq
0
0
RjReT
-
R2 In-q
0
0
In-q
0
(VOGT)
Proposition
2.2.5
R
-Ret
0
Let
trans-
is
0
A-'
M
q
coordinates
matrix
refined
B
glueing
the
real
where the inverse
1
-
after
A has the basis
that
0 In-
P,
coordinates
q toroidal so
to
a
theta
group.
form
with
Then every constant
5-closed
A-periodic
(0, p)-form
coefficients.
Proof
Eljl=p
Fjd-zj
Let
w
a)
The coefficients
=
be
Fj
o
A-periodic.
LR1
are
Zn+q-periodic
in the first
n
+ q variables
t'
of
Cohomology of toroidal
2.2
the real
t
parameters
=
(t', t")
E
R'n.
So
develop
we can
Fj
51
groups
into
a
real
Fourier
series
Fj
o
*(o,)
1:
LR1 M
(t ) e((u, 11
t
1
0,EZn+,l
of
(*),
v)
Fj(u,
We get
=
fj*(')
E,Ez,,+,
(Imv) e[E(O') (u, v)
(0-3) iIMV)l
-
with
the
help
where
E(') (u, v)
[(tUl
:
=
Rl)lmt]
-t93
Re u
[( tUl
-
and 0711 CT2 EZqand 93 E Zn-q The
previous
last
n
-
q
Lemmashows that
complex variables
must be constant
v.
tU3 RI)Ret
-
(t
-
U2
of
the components
are
the Fj But
93
E
a
R2)]
j(o')
the
fj*(')
I111
U
+
(U3) V)
i
Zn+q.
be assumed to be
can
then
t -
holomorphic
in the
(Imv) e(- (073, iIMV))
that
so
f J,
Fj
e(E('))
0'
O'EZn+q
with
coefficients.
constant
Now define
w(-)
f
jlo )e(E('))d-zj,
ljl=p
E
fjl
(a)
azi,
ljl=p
C(-)
((tf l
2
t93R,)Imi
i
[(to-,
tU3R,)Ret
-
-
(t92
tU3R2)
and q
C(-)
d-z
j=1
Then
U') Since
w
=
EIEZ"+q W()
is
5w
=
27rie(EW) (O')
&-closed 27ri
A
(O)
and
=
E e(E('))&)
79(a).
0, A
79(')
=
0.
Croo
It
would contradict
b)
It
C-linear
is well
C(')
that
is to remark
the
known
map D
:
V
0 0 for irrationality
[77, --+
p
o-
:A
0. Otherwise
condition
1.1.12(1)
7; MUMFORD]that
C there
exists
a
tal
map
for
any
=
for
t93R, toroidal
and
tO'2
=
tU3R2
groups.
C-vectorspace
V and any
52
Line
2.
Cohomology
and
Bundles
M-1
M
:AV--,
D]
A
V
the properties:
with
M
Dj (XI
(*)
A
A
...
Xm)
E(_I)m-k
=
D(Xk)XI
A
A
...
k
A
,
*
*
A
Xm
k=1
and If
D(Xo)
1, then for
=
D] (a D]
is the so-called
a
E
A'
XO)
+
(Dja)
every A
V
multiplication
interior
A
by
X0
a.
=
D. Now define
the
C-linear
space
q
Eajd-zj:
V:=
(j=l,..-,q)
ajEC
j=1
the
C-linear
map
D(')
V
:
C
--*
by
q
&)
q
D
d-zj)
aj
aj j=1
j=1
Zn+q\ f0j)
2
I C(,)
and 77
.-(_1
(a)
e(E('))D(')]
27ri
(79('))
(a
E
Zn+q\ jo}).
Then
Because
D(O')(&))
D(')j so
1
=:
(,d(')
get with A
&))
(D(')] (d(-)))
+
A
&') =,d(o')
that
e(E('))D(')j and with If
we
we
w(O)
=
(t)
define
is
A
formally
q
fj("d-zj,
a
convergent
Remember that
every
&))
+
E,00
E,,,o
Eljl=p
E,00 n(')
(?9(')
677(')
W(,)
=
E,9,0 77(l), form for
with
toroidal
coefficient
of
W
theta is
(or
w
becomes
coefficients. groups a
Ej
Zn+q\ 101)
W(O).
-
then
constant
n(')
(,)(')
=
finite
5-cohomologous
But
we can
only. sum
of summands
to
show that
Cj(U I
k E
every
R' ,o
(TT)
r- 10'31
independent
of
Fj
of Theorem 2.2.2
(93
-
k ff3
holomorphic for
that
so
I f J10'
and
a
are
'infEZ2 I tT t93RI
0
r
-
,
With
(172
T:=
E
Z2q
t
so
we
have
1
C(0')
2
with
a
real
for
We have
that
seen
addition there
exists
Indeed, so
that
a
for all
iIq
0
On toroidal tion
A
=
j
harmonic
the
case
I kO'3
with
fjd-zj
0)
d
E,7:0 I f(
< -
Of 0'3 on
)IrIO'3lkO'3
10' i
a
is
Q.E.D.
0-
=
toroidal
theta
coordinates
group
is
E C.
In
fj
coefficients
constant
toroidal
in
0`3
fj
every
=
0, if
> q.
fj
function are
form
which
is
H',P(X)
of
A-periodic
and
theta
represented
is
uniquely
not
toroidal
about
is
zj
2)fj
=
dfz-j
D-exact.
element
every
result
If
FC(-T)I
(0,p)-form
that
D(fjd'Tj)
groups
get the final
Eljl=p
assume
> q the
j dz-j
theta
invariant
Now we
form
E J with
every
in
even
Zn+q with
E
E,,,o
A-periodic
we can
j
dTj
a
(o-
Then
R1>0,
every
to
that
to
k E
every
2)-cohomologous
by for
determined
a
q
0
cD is in the
the
I
ka3,N
d
>
the
other
I fj
7q
-
Then
a.
I NI
k(OrN)
0'3,N
Ik
173,N.
ENf J(O'N )kO'3,N
cD
proof of
Eq(O*N) divergent.
so
closure
that
D -exact.
is not
=
D7 with
HO,P(X) -y
the
proposition
is
(O,p)-forms
proved, but not
be Hausdorff.
cannot
Eljl=p-l
=
Gjd-zj
of these
By uniqueness
2.2.5.
EN77 (6N )
divergent
Wefollow
proved
This
of the space of the a-exact
O'q (OrN)
the
proof
of
but
=
Proposition
and
g(-)e(E('))
E,
=
we
as
if
we
q(O'N)
take
as
above.
and get
=
J)P-ld(ON
27ri(-
)
9
A (-YN)
with
,0(-YN)
f J,( N)d-Zj
f
fd(ON)
=
9
Eg(ON)d-ZJ. 1
ljl=p Wewant to compare the coefficients
proof
of
Proposition
of d-zj
=
P
k=1
d-zj
A
...
A d-zp
only and get by
2.2.5
)D (ON)j (d-zk) E f J,( 'N) C(ON I
P
=
in
get
2),y(6N) EN'Y (0-N),
2.2.5
Gi
decompositions
convergent
)) A&N) D(6N)j (d(ON f
of the
is
assertion.
Assume that
with
It
convergent.
I C(ON)
V/ q
EN7)77 (ON)
space itself
Proof of the
>
n-q
every
:=
because then
this
is
is the
Decisive
in
We
2.2.5.
D(')j (?9('))
toroidal
fj
ko'3,lv
N-JaN1 for
convergent
I
N)
fJ
Proposition
jo
certain
a
&7N)
(E('))
e
=
that
so
of TN and
with
be
can
proof
of
55
groups
071,N, 172,N E Zq the components remember the
especially E Z)(ON) in the case of divergent same way as in that proof
is convergent
Indeed,
us
.
77
n(ffN)
with
Zn+q Let
E
of toroidal
27ri
E(_j)k-1g ON)C(6N) Jk k=1
k
56
Bundles
Line
2.
where the
side
right
of the
sum
Cohomology
and
is taken
jk
all
over
k,
(1,
=
p).
Then
P
fj(")
j:(_l)k-1g ON)C(UN)
21ri
--
k
J"
k=1
g AN )k 0'3,N
Because ery
k E
seen
R -01.
But this
in Theorem 2.2.6
must be
for
convergent
sequence
(o-N)
ev
have
as we
wild
of toroidal
for the characterization groups
toroidal
groups
finite of cohomologically groups of cohomologi-
complex
Lie
groups
define:
we
Definition X be
theta
X is
a
Lie
wild
theta
For Lie
group,
and wild
X is
a
a
Stein
following
X is
toroidal
3.
X is
Lie
complex iff
theta
the maximal
but
For the
proof
subgroup X0.
toroidal
group,
group.
subgroup
[571:
of type
Then:
1990 the
in
following
wild
toroidal
group,
iff
a
toroidal
(p
>
p:! ,
0).
q:
have theta
topology. subgroup X0 :A
iff
--
all
HO(XlXo, 0) HP(X,
topology. we
0
HP(X, 0)
all
not
=
1
R. Now
h(u) is the
unique
C-linear
be any R-linear
form
fixing
r
a
d(iu)
on
+
(u
id(u)
MCAwith
Imh
=
RA)
E
d. Moreover
let
r
:
RA
R
---
of Reh from MCAto RA. Then
extension
h(u) has after
:=
unique
:=
r(u)
C-linear
+
id(u)
extension
(u to
RA)
E
Cn.
Finally
p(A) with
iii) Of
c,\
as
in the
The rest course
used in
for
characteristic
:=
e(c,\
-
r(A))
decomposition
(A
E
2.1.3
is
A) a
semi-character
lattices
A.
Q.E.D.
is clear.
P-reduced
for
A
form.
=
Zn ED F C Cn the
Hermitian
decomposition
can
be
60
Quasi-Abelian
3.
Now it
is
classical
torus
Let
X
Then every
(Appell-Humbert be
line
Abelian
an
bundle
L
decomposition
Lie X
well
known
in
decomposition) be
can
given by 1
A)
A
with
group
[H(z,
2i
H, wild
Hermitian
on
I
:=,Q(A)e( with
decomposition
theory:
C'/A
=
following
the
get
to
easy
very
Corollary
3.1.2
Varieties
+
Z'
an
A)]
H(A,
2
=
+
ED F.
factor
automorphic
sx(z))
(A
summand sx and semi-character
in
o as
G
A)
the Hermitian
3.1.1.
Proof Define
the
polynomial
quadratic
1
q(z) q(z
Then
dant
to
+
a,\
q(z) E A).
A) (A
-
4i
:=
[S(z, A)
S(z, z)
4i +
1
S(A, A)]
2
factor automorphic characteristic homomorphism the
The lost
of the
part
h(z).
+
h(A)
Ox becomes cobor-
that
so
Q.E.D.
The APPELL-HUMBERTdecomposition cause
+
is
be used in
cannot
Z"-periodic.
nomore
form,
be-
about
the
F-reduced
Informations
go lost.
factor
given automorphic
in the
Appell-Humbert
decompo-
sition e
obviously
is
2i
cobordant
called
is therefore
and
a
wild
X
with the
+
theta the
is
A)]
S(A,
defines
1. It
factor
2
+
h(A))
(A
analytically
the
A)
c
bundle
trivial
X
x
C and
its
type,
factor. product
of
a
theta
factor,
defined
by
factor:
Definition
3.1.3
Let
to
A)
trivial
a
Every automorphic
[S(z,
=
Cn /A be
a
Chern class
A theta
cl
factor
,O,x (z)
=
9(A)e
with
group
alternating
characteristic
the
A of rank
1.
H is o a
a
form
A
:
A
x
A
---+
bundle
on
Z defined
(L).
of
type
(H,
1
( [(H 2i
+
p,
S, h)
S) (z, A)
for
+
A is
-
2
(H
where
2.
+ q and L be theta
n
and bilinear
Hermitian
semi-character
with for
ImHjAxA A,
=
A,
an
+
automorphic
S) (A, A)
+
factor
h(A))
(A
E
A)
X
by
I
S is
4.
h
symmetric
a
a
A reduced
C'.
on
factor
theta
is
(H,
(H,
of
1
of of
exponential
Together we
get
Theorem line
2.1.6
on
by
reduced
(H, p)
type factor
The wild
toroidal
a
Lq and
bundle
theta
(A
Werestrict
t,\
Lo by
(H,
line
q,
factor
wild
an
=
trivial
of type
factor
and can
X
topologically
a
theta
a
Cn be
factor
given by morphism
the
Of VOGT
t,\
=
X
:
by
--+
2.1.3, :
=
M(r, Z)
characteristic of
values
(XA,) Ak) (PRC)
A
P
A E
-
a
the
(XAk Aj) i
Cn
if
bundles
r
can we
(A,,
-
-
,
restrict
A,)
of
of the
alternating
A
on
=:
tXP
A(Aj, Ak) -
YX
=
relations
so
A
0
Lo
by
(A
a
E
factor
theta
of
A).
-
by
represented
be
can
=
A
on
values
to
a
theta
this
according in
A)
E
factors.
be
reduced
a
Chern class
=
-
-
-
,
by P
=
X
:=
(A,,
cl(L) homo-
characeristic
Now we
situation.
1,
A(Aj, Ak) (j,
and on
the
to
special
Aj (j
entries
basis
(A
i9,\
theta
A. The characteristic
lattices
integral
on
by reduced
Cn /A with
X
homomorphism
characteristic
Lq
=
Lo.
MCA
defined
R-independent
the matrix
(Period
L
alternating have complex
don't
-
e(sx) On
L
product
well
as
+ q and
n
:=
bundle
line
form
characteristic
the
Z-basis
the
defines
the
relations
to line
of rank
lattice
a
which
decomposition
of
A).
E
bundle
S, h)
be assumed to be constant
considerations
our
A c
note
instead
Theorem 2.1.10
bundles) C/A is
of line
group
Period
a
(A
summand s,\
of the N6ron-Severi group NS(X) which is defined by a reduced theta factor.
bundle
fix
(H,,Q)
A)
E
Every element
theta
A)
E
write
we
and the Decomposition
(Decomposition
bundle
LV is defined
Let
(A
simplicity
For
e(s),(z))
=
automorphic
an
Proposition
with
3.1.4
a
before.
A)])
H(A,
the
Every of
2
factor
tx,(z) is the
+
0, 0).
q,
A wild
as
p
1
A)
2i
0, 0) with H and
p,
factor
automorphic
an
( [H(z,
t9,\ (z) =,Q(A)e of type
61
form and
C-bilinear
form
C-linear
Riemann forms
Ample
3.1
r).
Let k
(XXl
=
1, *,
7
A,).
us
de-
-, r) X,\,)
Then
that for for
a
the
X E
M(n,
r;
characteristic
Q.
homomorphism)
62
Quasi-Abelian
3.
The solutions
fixed
a
on
as we
have
the
S) (z, A) fore
analytically proof of Corollary
the
A
factor
theta
with denote
we
respectively.
form
Hermitian
a
their
entries
Then X
2i
ImtPHP
(PRH)
SP]
+
A
=
basis
the
on
[H75
-L
=
without
course
analytically
trivial
for
we
q
0 and F is
set.
A
- 3.
preimage
KerH
(E
(H')
-r*
of
Let
Cn ,
H its
H'
preimage group
=KerH
covering
(E
x
Lie
of ker-r
space
RA).
n
course
Stein
on
MCAso that
(Lemma 1.1.6)
ker-F
kernel
by Stein
dimension that
so
H is
Stein
a
criterion
group
positive
which
Example:
according
previous
the
generates
=
EI(E
-_
0.
By
n
definite
RA has
En
1.1.6 =
proposition,
definite
of X with
a
groups
toroidal
group
generated
A)
no
0. E is the kernel
on
as an
complex
of the lift
Q.E.D.
MCA-
example
on
universal
Riemann form
variety is
a
under
connected
of ABE [61 shows.
The basis
P=
torus
an
C-linear
F
positive
is
subgroup
MCA
En
that
A',
for
form
ker-r
the
group
A' be
Then E C
C X.
an ample preimage of a homomorphism preserving a quasi-Abelian However, the image of a quasi-Abelian variety. even if the kernel homomorphism need not be quasi-Abelian,
Of
variety.
H' for
maximal
F be the
Let
H> 0
groups
ample Riemann
so
quasi-Abelian
a
Riemann form
group.
and the
E. Then
subspace of positive therefore
Stein
be any
Cn'/A'
=:
ample
an
universal
RA)
n
Abelian
for
connected
a
3>-2.
a
on
criterion
group
covering
=
of E n RA. Then F C MCA. But
subspace must be
:
A.
for
H= 0
that
so
and X'
group
H
E C Cn be the
let
Moreover
is
toroidal
a
Riemann form
ample
Stein
be
by
(
100
0
010
i
0 0 1
v/'2-
X, which allows
5i
0
+
v/3-i
two
V7_ projections
to the
2-dimensional
70
1
P1
Quasi-Abelian
Varieties
(1005i)
and
=
0 1 i
The torus
generated
Therefore
period
the
isomorphic
One main result
[33].
together
with
called
other
Fibration
3.1.16
1.
X is
2.
X has
a
toroidal
quasi-Abelian a
is
ABE
of type
with
variety Stein
Abelian
an
not
of two C*.
to
algebraic
of the
second
a
proof
in
1980
[6].
(GHERARDELLi-ANDREOTTI)
group
closed
maximal
XIN.
and
a
is
kernel
DODSON brought
Theorem. Wefollow
Theorem
X=Cn/A be
if the
even
-
isomorphic
by P2
generated
torus
product
of GHERARDELM and ANDREOTTIwas Theorem
[27].
results
projection
is
C*.
a
Fibration
it
respectively.
because it is the
fulfilled,
not
to
of the seminar
They
the
5i
v17-
0-i
+
of the first
But are
v/'2-
algebraic,
proective
relations
is also
projection
is
0
0 1
The kernel
one.
quasi-Abelian.
X is
because
Let
by P,
of dimension
groups
2 of
0
10
P2
q. Then
equivalent:
are
ample Riemann form for A of kind t. N -_ 0 x C*I with 2f + m n q
an
subgroup
=
of dimension
variety
-
q + t.
Proof 2 an
1. 3.1.15 Proposition ample Riemann form.
1 >- 2.
H be
Let
1"step.
Using
A such that
because
definite
positive
Frobenius'
with
m
n
q
-
If
m,
> 0
we can
period
An+q+l
lattice
A,
with
0 Im
tp, HP,
0
-D,
nonsingular
remains a
basis
P,,
=
(Al
and *
*
*
7
becomes
2nd step.
}mmws
same
the
OD1 0
0
0
0
)
of
-D,
as
basis
},rn-1
choose
basis
a
P
=(All***
7An+q)
with
D=diag(d1,---,dq+t).
in the
proof of Lemma3.1.8
PI
a
lattice
D,,, 0
=
(A,;
-
7
where DI
rw.,
Continuing
integral.
A2n-V)
way
new
0
lm'P.HP.
(Lemma 3.1.7).
can
Of
0
in the
that
so
homorphism preserving
a
2f
-
00
0
select
is
OD
-DO
tPH75
projection
C'
on
Lemmawe
0
Im
the
A.,,, with
this so
D..
=
=
further
of the extended
diag(di,
dq+ +1)
procedure that
a
An+q+l)
integral
diag(d,
till
m=
0,
we
get
valued
dn-1))
nonsingular. If f > 0,
we
get in the
same
way
as
in the
proof of
Lemma3.1.8
a new
period
/,tl
so
with
that
of the extended
the
P,,+,
basis
(A,,
=
Riemann forms
Ample
3.1
An-1)
p,
I
1mtP",+JH-P",+
=
1
(_O Ej) tE
with
Then
valued.
the basis
Pm+2
=::
get by the
we
(A,)'*
*
0
i
An-i)
same
lemma
a
dn-1
...
0
...
new
)
period
A2n-21571)
An-1+1)
pi)
0
...
di E2
0
IMtP.,,,+2H!5,,+2
-tE2
0
0
dn*-f
0
...
E2
with
0
0 0
0
...
dn-j+1
of a torus exists there a basis and integral. Finally nonsingular -P := Pm+2t jA2n-2,6'Y1C**i'Yi) -iAt An-i+W** (All* -)An-i7P1)' E:= E,,,+21 and nonsingular extended latticeA= Am+2X- With integral is
=
di 0
Im'PHTP
-tp
BE
where
0
Cn/Ais V step.
As
a
Riemann form
A:=
In this
situation
consequences 1.
U is
2.
CP is
regular =
a
variety consequence P
corresponding
is
a
the
basis
we
get
dn-1
dn
same
of the
Riemann form
Abelian
as
X.
k
variety
CnIA,
=
H
forAand Im
'P- HP
we
define
P
of the classical and with
(tP, W) basis
with
Abelian
an
group
of the
0
0
C-P
that
so
-Y,
of the extended
Am+2
lattice
a
A2n-2t)
E,
with
,
0
I
0
integral
i
A,,,+,
lattice
di
is
An-i+li
71
with
C:=t
(-tk 0) 0
=:
B
(U, V)
ofCAwhich defines part in CP. We get
with
relations
period BU-1
symmetric
integral
and
nonsingular.
U, quadratic PA-1 tP-
=
V. Then there 0 and
are
iPA-1 1P
two
> 0:
Wand Im W> 0. the
same
Abelian
variety
asA.
CP is the
72
3.
Quasi-Abelian
Varieties
di
0
W1'1
dq+l
Wl,q+f
Wq+l,l
CP
dn-f
Wn-1,1
0
Wn-f,q+t
WnJ and ImW positive
Because Wis symmetric
Wn,q+t
...
definite
principal
the
W1'1
Wl,q+,e
Wq+tj
Wq+t,q+t
minor
W*
has the If
we
define
T
the first
according
(D, W*)
:=
of
lattice
the
generates onto
properties.
same
q + I variables
CP with
matrix
shows the
The theorem
D
diag(di,
=
induces kernel
_-
of fibre
importance
above,
as
The
variety.
homomorphism C' (D C*m.
a
N
dq+1)
Abelian
X
Y
-->
then
T
projection
Cn/TZ2q+2f
:=
Q.E.D.
bundles
Stein
with
fibres
and
a
base space.
algebraic
projective
with
q + f-dimensional
an
Definition
3.1.17
A
X complex manifold projective algebraic variety
A consequence
X such that
of the Fibration
X is
iff
it
an
analytic
is
submanifold
a
in
set
of
a
X.
Theorem is the
(ABE [4, 51)
Theorem
3.1.18
quasi-projective,
is
Every quasi-Abelian
variety
is
quasi-projective.
Proof The fibration
fibre
compactify bundle
over
these
X with
an
A consequence with
a
general of
shows that
theorem
bundle
KODAIRA].
Abelian
fibres
to
Abelian
Pj+m variety
algebraic
group
as
quasi-Abelian
the
variety
of KODAIRA's
projective linear
an
so as
with
X variety C'1A is a C' (9 C*m. We can -=
fibres
X becomes
that
a
submanifold
base space and fibres
embedding
base space,
structure
Stein
group
theorem
projective is
projective
is
that
space
in
a
fibre
Pt+m. every
fibres
algebraic
fibre
and
[60,
bundle
projective Theorem 8
Q.E.D.
The
In the
general
the
ample
to
of de Rham cohomology
Hodge decomposition
pings
case
to
Let X
=
C'/A
be
Abelian
an
coordinates
in toroidal
B
(Iq, t)
=:
So the
matrix.
is
of
q.
forms of A
The basis
LR(t)=
parametrization
T and R
torus
a
At
(t
Ret Imt
A:=
0
Ri
E
R2n)
functions
A-periodic
transforms
t'
+ q variables
A-periodic
r-form
W(t)
of t
E
r!
0 0
In-q
:=
can
(Ri, R2)
of the real
which
functions
into
(t', t")
0
0
0
0
be
given
glueing
the
written
toroidal
are
Zn+q -periodic
in
the
ER2n.
be written
can
1 =
=
0
R2 In-q
0
with
of differential
R, R2
In-q
basis
the
(LR)
A
Main
of the
Iq
0
I.
n
map-
proof
with
coordinates
first
Holomorphic
as
P
where
forward
groups.
corresponds
varieties.
of type
group
bundle.
line
theta
bundle
line
positive
straight
average
Lie
a
same a
quasi-Abelian
and the
Cohomology
the
allow
spaces
the
characterizes
Theorem which
by
determined
Riemann forms
complex projective
the
of
only for
works
groups
of the Chern forms
the average
varieties
quasi-Abelian
of
Characterization
3.2
the real
in
(t)dtil
fi'...i,
A
t-parameter ...
A
as
(t
dti,
E
R2n)
I 0.
(Dj f)
The
.
e
applied
-4
on
7r2
lLj2
f
EDj2)'f
(47r2-
F
for
k
integer
any
0
get
(47r 2)2
j,
+
(til)2 1
1
IIZ12)k
1(4,7r2
right-hand
The
the left-hand course
this
side side
is true
By Sobolev's
is
continuous
even
for
in
uniformly
converges
any
-
2+q )kf(t)12
D2
dt
D
n
'1 T
0'
t".
So
on
Theorem the
by Dini's
every
compact
subset
series
C C Rn-q.
on
of
DIf.
embedding theorem
1: D,f(')
[72,
p
78/79]
(t")e((o-,
t'))
the series
0'
converges
of R
n-q
Now let
tangent in
absolutely so that f K
:=
bundle
C'-category,
and is
a
RA/A
uniformly
x
C, where C
is
any
compact subset
Q.E.D.
Coo-function.
be the
maximal
of K. The tangent
where
T
on
TR.-,,
real
bundle
compact subgroup TX of X is identified
is the tangent
bundle
of
Rn-q
of X and TK the with
TK
x
TR,
quasi-Abelian
of
Characterization
3.2
varieties
75
Definition
3.2.2
Cn/A
Let
X
real
subtorus
=
be
K
Abelian
an
RA/A.
=
1
Av(w)(t")
-
r!
)ir
n
+
< r
holomorphic
spaces.
holomorphic
set,
of
the existence
of ABE guarantees
under
Proposition
Suppose of
(V(1),
Wj.
(CC
JVJ
(j
CE X
every
space and then
metric
remember that
compact Lebesgue 3.2.16
i
Wj
0:-: on
sup
:=max
dimensional
X of dimension
Vj
L is trivial
proposition
higher
For that
=
have
following
The
we
space.
with
HO(X,L),
on
complete
therefore
V
metric
JWjJ
and
of X, such that
coverings
of the above lemma,
0 of L'.
of sections
(P E
=
CI/A
H'(X, L)N+1
and let
with
N >
zeros
on
n.
Then the
X is of first
category.
Proof It
is
sufficient
to
prove
the
statement
for
any
compact
subset
C C X,
because
X is the countable
f
M:=
Statement
M is
a.
For each
j take xj
Because
Oj
of compact
union
E
closed
in
E
C,
a zero
87
HO(X, L)
-P in
--+
that
assume
Oj(xj)
=
C1.
on
4ij
M E)
get 0
we
varieties
consider
0. Wecan
=
C
on
Let
:
Oj (xj)
such that
we
!P has
:
HI(X,L)N+l
uniformly
converges
L)N+1
HO(X,
4
So
sets.
quasi-Abelian
of
Characterization
3.2
xj
O(xo)
--+
=
N+1.
xo c
--+
0
so
C.
that
0 E M.
Statement
0(0),
-
b.
without
Statement N>
((p(O),
Let
c.
no
zeros
loss
without
considered
UO n C with
=
0
according :
=
Now
Op (UO we
M has T1
=
O.O(Cj)
finish
(00),
-
the
aNO)
-
aN)
the
,
compact
proof
of
Let
E
the
0
E
L)'+'
Theorem
N+r+2
HO(X, L)
-
Ix
we
set
(N)
0
W
-,
coordican
be
O(x) 0 01.
G U:
If
UO n C =: UjOO=1 Cj CN+1 is a holo-
U, 0
:
-
__+
(0)
The
zeros
we can
show that
to
b) Applying
there
C.
on
is
rest
statement
exists
:...
a
statement
that
conclude
1: aNiOj))
-
HO(X,
E
L)N+1
j=0
and
suitable
arbitrarily
small
coefficients
So 4i is
aij.
no
Q.E.D.
(ABE)
Suppose that HO(X, L) generates holomorphic mapping
[e]
:=
-
of M.
3.2.17
:
(P(N))
:
L
on
X and N >
V(j)
PN with
of the N-dimensional
is the
hyperplane
bundle
proposition
there
exist
sections
E
n.
Then there
HO(X, L)
X
Proof By the previous
where
assume
some
Lebesgue measure zero in CN+1 Then we can take proposition.
After
without
%OW, ..' W(N)
C for
on
point
(O
we can
in
r
-I:
interior
=
Uo
proposition. M.
j=0
'P
of this
r
zeros
W(O),
O(N) /0)
...'
sets
formulating
HO(X,
E
(0, TI)
to
(W(0) no
U. Let
0. If UO n C 0 0,
(OM/0,
before
point.
V'))
-
c) successivly
has
C is contained
The sections on
C and
HO(X, L)N+1
E
set
in
zeros
CN+1 \ Z: For that
E
functions
are
without
CN+1 such that
Z C
set
zero
L is trivial.
Z
U:
in
HO(X, L)N+2
compact
0,0
Because
interior -
-,
common zero
number of sections
finite
a
C).
n
can no
that
the remark
to
-
-
ready with
Cj.
map, all
morphic
(a,,
any
exists
compact U by assumption. E
(P(N)
-..'
U on which
we are
compact
Lebesgue
holomorphic
be
to
a
generality
of
neighborhood
nate
Z
C for
on
in
(p(N), 0)
aoO,
-
any
even
-,
-
exists
( p(o) has
-
X there
without
common zero
Then there
n.
U Cl--
open
any
OME HO(X, L)
-,
-
Indeed,
For
W(O),
-
and L
projective
-
-
,
V(N)
E
=
exists
-!P*
space
a
[e], PN-
HO(X, L) hav-
Quasi-Abelian
3.
88
ing
no common zero
The fact
L
that
Varieties
on
[e]
P*
=
They define
X.
the theta
ABE and
has
factor
generalized that
proved
The additive
1960 for
in
a
of X defines
the exact
which
cohomology
the
-
-
-
-+
Cn/A
0
Let
M* (U,,)
fmlf,
:=
[D']
that
so
by
a
be
a
determines
Suppose
0-
a
0
open
an
covering
f Um
[D].
D, D'
bundle
line
-5* [D]
the map D
If
becomes
sequence.
-4
0
5 H1 (X, 0*)
Div(X)
-4
we
get the
same
...
homomorphism
Pic(X).
and H a Hermitian
group we
group
-4
form
on
Cn with
X
=
imagi-
write
:=
AIRA XRA
(ABE)
the Hermitian that
functions
[10].
0.
cohomology
-4 M*/O*
of the Picard
toroidal
holomorphic
a
on
of
HO(X, M*) ?4 HO(X, M*/O*)
Theorem
L be
0-
functions
HA := -UIMCA XMCA and AA 3.2.18
of the
sequence
A:= Im. H. Then
part
nary
E
g,,,
[D]
J:
Let X
fm
0* -"* M*
-4
and the definition
Using
groups
fibres
sequence
0
induces
bundle
the
meromorphic
of germs of
be described
can
toroidal
on on
by
holomorphic
D + D' defines
then
homomorphism
Indeed,
sheaf
functions
if
HO(X,M*10*),
functions
local
the transition
divisors,
=
of germs of
by
D given
A divisor
a
be identified
can
groups,
semi-definite,
[63, 641.
constant
are
toroidal
positiv
bundles
line
by the given line
is determined
multiplicative
the
and 0* the subsheaf
is
form
all
functions
Div(X)
where M* is
factor
automorphic for
groups
and in 1964 for
theta
a
property
of divisors
group
toroidal
on
groups
by
meromorphic
the
M
are
torus
non-trivial
form which
Hermitian
functions
1995 this
in
PN+l.
-+
Q.E.D.
form determined
the Hermitian
that
X
is trivial.
Meromorphic KOPFERMANN proved
map 0:
a
H'(X, L)
line
bundle
form
generates
over
a
toroidal
group
suppose
H'(X, L) =7
C'1A
which
H on Cn.
L
on
X
or
0
.
Then:
there
1.
exists
A-equivalent For
2.
H'(X,L)
E
constant'
01 /02
is
C'/A
is the
quasi-Abelian
ft
form
Hermitian
varieties
which
C'
the
on
89
is
H.
to
01,02
any
semi-definite
positive
a
of
Characterization
3.2
xO +
on
(KerHA)
7r
all
for
xo E
f
function
'02 0- 0 the meromorphic
with
X, where
7r
:
C'
X
--
projection.
Proof
a)
H'(X, L)
If
L, then by Theorem
generates
there
3.2.17
exists
holomorphic
a
mapping 4
(01
Since
The
P,
:
02
o(o)
assume
(P(N))
(0)
(,p
=
positive
is 2
02
exists
h
metric
h
o
E
1
H. Since any
(
t
positive
is
0
a
Lemma3.2.15
L2determines
The
the
Note that
2The
set
in
e
positive
a
=
P,,-,
C
curvature
-P)
azj C9Zk
%,
Jacobian
of !P and
tiT(t', Cn, fl,
on
*
k
=
1,---,n
by
Theorem 3.2.13
V)dt')j,k=l,...,n
is
is also
semi-definite.
t
a)
of
positive
A-equivalent
Hermitian as
such that
f2
form
a
meromorphic indeterminacy.
Chern form
of the
of the
xO
form
2H.
a),
in
we
For
such that
f
and then the last
are
function
Hermitian
Fubini-Study
E (,9fl
to
For
(dt.
0 for E (afl( f is constant on xo + 7r(KerHA). of a) if HO(X, L) :A the assumption
point
a
L 2 satisfies
two theorems
of its
(1, 1)-form
is the
A, given by (fK
ft
Hermitian
following
the
7r
!P and then
b) By
same as
h with
matrix
a2 log(h
(
-
semi-definite
neighborhood
Therefore
the
1 :=
H((,
=
definite.
definite
we can
HA C MCAwe get
G Ker
Then in
divisor
hyperplane
the
metric
the Hermitian
(E -T(z))
form
the Hermitian
for
by
fibre
a
'i9!P E &P, where a(fi
We have
property
same
[e].
(_49Xii9Tk)j,k=1,---,N
-
(P induces
=
-!P*
=
define
we
7r
pullback
HO(X, L) and L
has the
PN+2
X
P, defined
on
E:=
and the
E
-
there
that
so
the fibre
With
[e]
bundle
hyperplane
form.
P)
V),
=
(p(N))
(0)
(P
O(j)
P N with
X
is
ft
--A
even
metric
semi-
2H. The rest
of the
proof is Q.E.D.
Pn.
exists
on
to
constant
on
0. Besides
positive
steps
h
positive
is
a
2H there
decisive
on
=
is constant
called
fibre
metric
have
[e]
xo +
the Main Theorem. on
is
ir(KerHA).
every
given
set
by
contained
the
associated
in
90
Quasi-Abelian
3.
(ABE)
Theorem
3.2.19
Varieties
Any meromorphically Proof Let X
C'/A
=
set
of all
are
positive
be
theta
separable
toroidal
meromorphically
a
factors
79 with
semi-definite
quasi-Abelian
a
toroidal
determining
type
a
is
separable
MCA,
on
group
variety. Define
group.
Hermitian
T
H' ,
forms
the
as
which
and let
nKer(H o)A-
Ker T:=
'OET
It
suffices
Indeed, there
dimc Ker T
if
Cn
:
7r
Ker T
show that
to
X
-4
exists
Cn/A
==:
0.
0, then
>
is the
line
pole
the t9 is
theta
a
non-zero
we
HIA
choice
> 0
of
KerHA
f.
toroidal
Abelian
a
by
the
assume
meromorphically separable, Let f (,7r(x)) -7 f (7r(y)).
divisor
zero
of
f,
and then
on
By
the
same
the projection
simultaneously L O (9 LO,
and
Theorem 2. 1. 10 that
L
=
by where
form H. Now there
By
=
d E T.
where
[(f),, ]
=
by
7r(y),
:?
X such that
on
[(f)o]
X is
type which determines the Hermitian plo. p, 0 E HO(X, L) such that f
such that
Theorem 3.2.18
Theorem f is constant of KerT.
But this
on
the
contradicts
Q.E.D.
(CAPOCASA-CATANESE)
Theorem
3.2.20
Any
of
sections
of
projection the
of f. Wemay
factor
exist
get
determined
bundle
divisor
f
7r(x)
Ker T with
E
x, y
Since
function L:=
be the
take
projection.
meromorphic
a
=
with
group
a
non-degenerate
meromorphic
function
is
quasi-
a
variety.
Proof f be
Let X L
f
=
is
(W10)
o 7r
by
determined If
KerHA :
ABE in
proved
1987
[1]
is not
the
in
existence
bundle
meromorphic
Then there
holomorphic projection
an
all
ample
results toroidal
7r
z
is
exist
:
groups
Cn
function
+
KerHA for
1989
[4]
all
of
[33].
meromorphic
functions
form
z
by
E C'
the
A.
H
same
Q.E.D.
in
toroidal
theta
supplements
with
their
CAPOCASAand CATANESEadded the
non-degenerate
bundle
line
0 of L such that
Hence HA is positive
GHERARDELLIand ANDREOTTI contributed
1974
where
by Theorem 3.2.18.
Main Theorem for in
C',
X. The Hermitian
-4
non-degenerate. for
on
holomorphic W and
semi-definite
Riemann form of the
a
sections
L is positive
f is constant on possible because f
main
and for
predecessor rem
the line
and therefore
definite
group.
prime
the natural
with
0, then
This
theorem.
toroidal
a
relatively
X and
on
A-periodic
non-degenerate
a
C'1A
=
classical
1991
[20].
in
Fibration
aspect
groups
[10].
As
Theo-
of the
toroidal
a
1.) 2.) 3.) 4.)
(Characterization Cn /A the following
Main Theorem
3.2.21
For
X is
a
X has
X
group
=
quasi-Abelian line a positive
X is the
covering
X has
closed
a
quasi-Abelian
of
Characterization
3.2
of
varieties
91
quasi-Abelian varieties) are equivalent:
statements
variety. bundle. of
group
Abelian
an
subgroup
Stein
N
variety. C' x C*m
-
so
XIN
that
is
an
Abelian
variety.
5.) 6.) 7.)
X is
quasi-projective.
X is
meromorphically
X has
a
separable. meromorphic non-degenerate
function.
Proof Theorem 3.2.11.
1
2.
2
1.
Theorem 3.2.13.
3.
Theorem 3.1.10.
1
Theorem 3.1.16.
1 >- 4.
Fibration
4 >- 5.
Theorem 3.1.18.
5 >- 6.
trivial.
3 >- 7.
trivial.
6 >- 1.
Theorem 3.2.19.
7 -
Theorem 3.2.20.
In
1.
showed in which
-
section,
iff
and
rank
n
it
is
special
the
in
a
-
trivial
0.
bundle
line
has
a
prove
for
proposition
the
3,
non-trivial
and MARGULIS [47] HUCKLEBERRY
trivial.
COUSIN
of rank
2 and lattices
of dimension
case
topologically
1983 to
HO(X, L)
assumption
used the
used his
any dimension
n
and
+ 1.
in
L is
that
assumption
3.2.22
in
language analytically
a new one
ABE proved
Let
[261
1910
we
in modern
idea
The
propositions
previous
some
Q.E.D.
[10]
1995
topologically
trivial
following
more
general
on
toroidal
the
Proposition (ABE) line a holomorphic
bundle
L be
determines
Hermitian
a
Then Ho (X,
L) :A 0,
iff
form L is
H on C'
analytically
is not
a
and suppose
necessary.
result:
X
group
HA
Cn /A
=
which
0.
trivial.
Proof Ho (X, L) 0 0, then take any o E HO(X, L) with p HO(X, L2) generates L2 on X and let 21-1 be the Hermitian
If
L2. By Theorem 3.2.17 !P
:
(,p
(0)
:
...
we
:
have
O(N))
a
:
holomorphic
X
---+
PN
0.
By
form
Lemma3.2.15
determined
mapping with
W(j)
E
Ho (X,
L
2
by
92
3.
for
which
Assume
Quasi-Abelian we can
now
P(xo
that
and then The
+
y)
there
=
X. This
converse
is trivial.
The
following theta
exists
4i(xo)
for
2
W
=
zero
a
!P is constant
on
trivial
o(O)
suppose
that
Theorem 3.2.18
Varieties
the
on
all
y E
example of ABE in 1989 [6] shows the with LIA 0, then HO(X, L) =
The basis
toroidal
in
1
0
O v'2-
1
0
1
a
toroidal
generated
.
A
form
C3
on
--
A(el,
e-3) ie3)
A(x, y) get
a
Hermitian
form
H(x, y) Consider theta In
the theta
bundle
general
discuss
this
it
L. is
=
factor
not
MCASO
7r(MCA)
easy
in
=
to
the
=
0
0
=
of
non
topologically
0.
0
=
-A(e3,
el)
A(ei,
e3),
=
0
otherwise.
H on C3 defined
A(x, iy)
+
0, but L is discuss
next
existence
iV2 i-v/-3 iV3- 0
iA(x,
V whose Hermitian
Then HA
problem
XO +
R' by
A(iel,
we
XO +
=
on
of
C3/A. Let Jel, e2, e3l be the natural complex by f el, e2, e3) iel, ie2 I. Wedefine an alternat-
X
group
of C3 Then RA is
ing R-bilinear
0
-=
p
proof
coordinates 0
By A
Therefore
the
Q.E.D.
P
basis
of xO + KerHA
projection
7F(MCA).
W. As shown in
possible.
is not
bundles
Example:
generates
E X of
xo
the
chapter.
not
by
y), form
x, y E
is
topologically
conditions
for
C3.
H, and trivial
the
corresponding AA 0 0-
for
H(X, L) :A
0.
We shall
and Extension
Reduction
4.
can
be reduced
non-trivial
sections. it
questions
defined
form
Hermitian
proved
useful
is
by
Automorphic
4.1
For the
morphic
live
forms
an
a
have
t > 3. For
toroidal
if and
possible,
group
if the
only
ABE condersidered
of kind
Riemann form
ample
conditions
problem of
the
them,
satisfies
factor
with
from
group.
always
L
integer
any
condition.
certain
a
is
toroidal
a
he
t.
forms
automorphic
of
existence
fulfils
is associated
where the fibration
case
bundle
for
bundles this
a
bundles
line
bundles
Riemann form
of
reduction
line
M. STEIN showed that
the
concept
ample
very
holomorphic
extend
to
is
of
line
in
sections
positive
that
V
that
also
general
a
meromorphic
conjecture
the
compactifications.
to standard
the
He
With
of the
existence
TAKAYAMAproved
Recently
some
of the
proof
a new
gave
of non-trivial
existence
bundles.
line
positive
to
of the
question
the
ABE showed that
If
necessary.
are
is reduced
existence
to
the
a
given
case
auto-
of
ample
Memann forms.
Reduction Let X
=:
bundle
over
First
we
Wehave
(CO) is
Cn /A be
consider
the
already
seen
HA
necessary
We shall
a
X which
=
to
toroidal
group
determines necessary
that
the
HIMCAXMCAis
for
prove
positive
the
of type
definite
form
a
holomorphic
line
H.
HO(X, L) :A
for
conditions
L be
and let
q,
the Hermitian
case
0.
condition
positive
semi-definite
and not
zero
HO(X, L) 0 0 (Theorem 3.2.18). four
that
other
(Cl)
conditions
-
(C4)
are
also
necessary
for
HO(X, L) :A 0.
By
Theorem 3.1.4
given by bundle
a
we
reduced
given by
an
may
factor
assume
that
L
=
L,9 (& LO, where LV is
0,\ of type (H, p) and LO
automorphic
factor
t,\
=
Y.Abe, K. Kopfermann: LNM 1759, pp. 93 - 124, 2001 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001
e(s,\).
is
a
topologically
Consider
a
theta
trivial
the condition
bundle line
Reduction
4.
94
(Cl)
Ker(AA)
and Extension
D
Ker(HA),
It
is obvious
iff
MCAn Ker(AA)
(X, L) :A 0,
Proof Suppose Then
that
L')
Ho (X,
we
L
then
=
consider
Let
prime
L,
7r
:
C'
L
=
V) f
be the canonical
is
of
group
Lemma3.2.15
contradiction.
Moreover
there
Wedefine
projection.
rela-
exist
Lemma3.2.15).
after
a
non-constant
by
C'
on
(C 1). By (C 1).
a
(C 1) is not satisfied. H'(X, L) (see Remark
E
C'/A
function
period
the
(Cl)
satisfy
not
and obtain
situation
0
f We set
ImH.
The condition
the condition
does also
X and
on
p,
satisfy
not
X and L'
on
following
the
X
)
=
(C 1).
the condition
Lo does
(9
L'
sections
meromorphic
Ker(HA).
C
A
xRA with
Ker(HA).
=
L satisfies
generates
Ho (X, L) generates
tively
that
AIRA
(ABE [8])
Theorem
4.1.1
=
MCAn Ker(AA)
Remark.
satisfied, If HI
AA
where
0
Ir
:=
O
0 7r
f
Pf :=JaEC':f(x+a)=f(x)f6rallxEC'JObviously
Pf a
projection
T :Cn
period
with
group
epimorphism
-r
toroidal.
7r'
Let
Pf.
)
Cn IF
by
gives
a
f
=
)
exists g
the
a
T. Let
o
X'
be the
relatively L'
bundle
of
Cn,
write Pf FEDF, subgroup. Consider the meromorphic function g on Cn IF a
we can
A'
:=
T
T(A). :
Since
canonical
Then A' is
Cn
)
X' and
Cn IF
a
an
must
be
The function
projection.
functions.
relatively
subgroup
induces
X'
toroidal,
X is
prime holomorphic over
=
discrete
projection
(Cn IF)IF.
:=
two
line
and F is
There
X1
subgroup
closed
Therefore
X
represented
representation of L'
Cn IF.
)
a
subspace
F such that
A C
locally
is
complex linear
of F because
is
Pf
A. Since
::)
where F is
prime
This
g
local
sections
0,
0'
such that
071 g 0
From
f
=
g
o
T it
0'7r'
0 7r
0'0
0 7r
Since L
--
Let
(1)
the
pairs
7r/
follows
(W, 0)
and
are
0
T
7r'O T*
both
relatively
prime
pairs,
we
obtain
T* L'.
H' be the Hermitian
form
AA
=
determined
AA,
by T*L'.
where A'=
By
Im H'.
L
_-
T*L,
we
have
Ker(HA) F. A'
f
3.2.18
Theorem
By
pull-back
is the
is
f
Since
C F.
constant
is
of
a
hand,
On the other
Ker(HA) and (2)
but
Ker(AA)
xo
(Cl)
is
(CI)
Ker(AA)
E:=
Then E is
Cn IF.
on
contained Then
we
complex
a
in
have
.
yo
exists
A(xo, yo) 0
RA with
A'(xo, yo)
=
Then, there
satisfied. E
x0
E
By (1)
0.
0.
=
satisfied,
is
set
we
Ker(AA)-
Ui
subspace of
linear
Ker(HA)
the property
Cn with
c E.
Proposition
4.1.2
H be
ft
take
exists
Ker(ft)
with
=
satisfying
C'
on
E, if HA is
Furthermore,
in
this
on
Cn with
case
we can
definite.
positive
not
ft
form
Hermitian
(Cl).
condition
the
(CO).
the condition
semi-definite
positive
a
H satisfies
iff
H,
-A
form
Hermitian
a
there
Then
ft,
form
Then
C'.
E
x
not
Q.E.D.
When the condition
Let
any
MCA is
contradiction.
a
(E)
is not
We can take
A(xo, yo) This
for
function,
95
f6rallxEKer(HA)andyERA-
condition
the
Ker(HA)
+
x
alternating
R-bilinear
AA(x,y)=O,
(2)
on
non-constant
a
forms
Automorphic
4.1
Proof proof
The If
is
definite,
HA is positive
(Cl)
the condition
the
Weconsider inite
nor
Suppose
case
there
0,
automatically.
(Cl)
the condition
that
RA
=
=
exists
a
On the other
> 0
hand,
=
and neither
semi-definite
> 0
such
is satisfied.
Wenote that
.
f
q
=
-
k, k
real
There exist ED V2 i Cn
MCA( V1
=
linear
MCAED V1
(D
positive
def-
we
=
A(w', iw')
!
=
=
allw'112
for
all
w'
E
have b > 0 such that b
jjxjj
Ilyll
for
all
x, yE Cn.
as
c
-
2b2
b -
2
2
> 0
and
subspaces V, (D iV1 ( iV2
V2
Ker(HA) ED V, in this Ker(AA) Since HjCi,,C4 dimc Ker(HA).
such that
IA(x, iy) I :! c
=
zero.
H(w', w')
Take
Ker(HA)
Since
itself.
Lemma3.1.7
is
HA is positive
that
Ker(HA) E) V, iV, MCA Ker(HA) E) C,
and E
this
then
is satisfied
and V2 of Cn such that Let
of Lemma3.1.7.
generalization
a
c
-
2
b
2b 2 -
b
> 0.
C.
case.
>
0,
96
Reduction
4.
Let
V2
T:
x
and Extension
V2
R be
T(V21V2) Now,
define
we
>
AI(v,x):=O
f6rvEVj(DV2andxERA,
A, (V2, iV1)
A, (vj,
A, (V2, 'V21)
T(V2)
-A(vi
=
V21)
-Aj(x,ivj)
Aj(ivj,iv):=
Aj(vj,v)=0
Aj(iV2,X):=
-Aj(x,iV2)
for
0
=
7
exists
H + Hi.
that
=
ft
Then
Ker(A)
=
show
Ker(A)
E C
Ker(A).
-A
E.
=
iV2
V Ker(A). Ker(A). Therefore
Next
we
C'
V2
ED
(D
iV2
Noting
ft
is written
E is
=
(3)
(4)
following
V2,
V,
V2.
Eq
x, y EE Cn.
=
A,,
positive
uniquely
iAj (x, y).
for
(A,)A
A + A,.
=
0-
Ker(H-)
Since
=
Ker(A),
=
it
=
\ 101. (A,)A
Since
=
=
=
i
definite
on
0
(D
V2
ED
W2. Every element
as
wherewECandu,vEV2.
inequalities
ft(w, w)
i.e.
Ker(HA) E) V, 0 iVj, we can easily see Ker(AA)nV2 f 01, there exists 0 it follows that A(V2, Y) A(21 Y) 0 0we have A(iV2) iY)= A(V2 Y) =A 0. Then,
E
hand
is
part
Ker(A).
w+u+iv Wehave the
ft
Im
C:
all
+
H is obvious
A:=
E. Let
On the other
show that
V2 E
H, whose imaginary
A, (x, iy)
=
v
for
form
Take any V2 E V2
Then V2
V, and
E
vi
V2 and
iy)
A, (ix,
RA with A(V2, Y) 0 0. From
y E
for
V2,
V2 E
Hermitian
a
to
We show
suffices
iV2)
f6rV2EV2andXERA,
H, (x, y)
fl:=
R by
Cn
X
f6rVjEVjandvEVj0)V2,
A, (x, y)
Let
Cn
forviEVIandxERA,
A, (iV2, iV) : A, (V2 V) Then A, has the property
there
,
V2, v' 2 E
for
Aj(ivj,x):=
Therefore
V2.
f6rVjEVjandVEVj V2,
iV2)
=
:
form with
symmetric
V2 E
A,
form
f6rXEMCAandyE Cn,
-A(vj,iv)
all
for
AI(x,y):=O Aj(vj,iv):=
R-bilinear
CJJV2 112
alternating
R-bilinear
an
definite
positive
a
H(w, w)
Ifl(w,u)+fl(u,w)1=12A(w,iu)1 0.
Conversely we assume that there exists ft on C' with ft -A H. Suppose that there
exists
0. Let
y
xo E
iyo
:=
Ker(HA)
ft(y,
Y)
A(Y, iY) A(yo, iyo) A(yo, iyo)
=
=
=
If
we
take
Suppose tion
we
In this
t > 0
may
case
sufficiently
the
that
Ker(A)
large,
(CO)
conditions
assume
n
(Cl)
condition
Ker(AA).
xo
semi-definite
positive
Take yo E
is
Hermitian
form
fulfilled.
Then
not
RA such
as
A(yo, xO)
0 in
By Proposition definite
on
H is
then 4.1.2
we
A
x
H
on
C'
is
called
a
A,
(CO)
the conditions
H satisfies
form
A Hermitian
group.
X, if
Riemann form for
(1) (2)
toroidal
a
(Cl).
Riemann form
ample
an
may
and
that
assume
for
X.
Riemann form
a
semi-
positive
H is
C'.
on
Lemma
4.1.8
H1, H2 be Riemann forms for H, + H2 is also a Riemann form for
Let
Ker(AA)
a
toroidal
=
C'/A.
Then H
X with
(Ker((AI)A))
=
X
group
(Ker((A2)A))
n
.
Proof
(1)
The conditions
before
positive
semi-definite
on
we
lemma,
the
Then,
C".
Ker(H) Using the facts
it
was
to
been
we
proof
the
by
the
proved
0
X
:
=
C/A )
Lie
X,
the
manifolds.
Ker(H2).
n
MCAn Ker(AA),
=
we
by
a
over as
to
for
theorem
reduction
extended
was
non-compact
ho-
due to
for
reduction
ABE
[4]
shows
more
another
that
We mention
Lie groups.
How-
precisely
proof
of the
and CATANESE[201. CAPOCASA
toroidal a
meromorphic It
meromorphic
of the
reduction)
(Meromorphic
be
group
(Ker((A2)A)),
and SNOW[48]. HUCKLEBERRY
theorem following meromorphic reduction.
Theorem
Abelian
are
that
n
of the
is obtained
theorem
X
and H
Q.E.D.
know the existence
how to get
Let
fulfilled
are
proved.
mogeneous manifolds
4.1.9
Ker(HI)
(Ker((AI)A))
=
compact homogeneous complex
ever
is trivial
=
GRAUERTand REMMERT [371
Then
may
(CO)
H1, H2
that
assume
Ker(H) n RA and Ker(HA) Ker(AA) for H and (Cl) is satisfied
Ker(AA) as
=
it
we
the condition
that
see
and
of the Riemann form
the definition
in
note
H. As
for
group.
quasi-Abelian
fibres,
which
Then there
variety has the
exists
X,
following
with
a
holomorphic
the
properties:
connected
fibration
complex
102
Reduction
4.
toroidal a homomorphism between gives the isomorphism p* : M(Xi)
1.
q is
2.
p
3.
If
T
X
:
there
the
into
homomorphism quasi-Abelian variety
a
M(X),
)
homomorphism
a
meromorphic
the
groups.
unique
such
that
is called
Y is
)
exists
means
X,
and Extension
f --+ f 0 quasi-Abelian
a
a
: X, X, exists
0.
Y with
)
Y, then
variety a
T
This
op.
uniquely.
of X.
reduction
Proof If there
exists
lytically In this
may
all
H'(X, L)
have
we
X, is the trivial
case
Suppose
Riemann form for
no
trivial
that
there that
assume
Riemann forms
for
0
by
any line
the previous
bundle
L
X not
ana-
Hence M(X)
results.
C.
=
group.
exists
H is
X, then for =
Riemann form
a
H for
semi-definite
positive X which
are
By Proposition
X.
C1. Wedenote
on
semi-definite
positive
on
by
4.1.8 R the
C'.
Let
that
E
we
of
set
E:=nKer(H). HER
By A*
there
Lemma4.1.8
Consider
the
(A)
=
is
an
mann
form
f
f
--+
Lie
o
p is
group
X. Then
R,
x
E C
EI(E X,
X
C'IE.
of Cn 1E. Let
X1. Since is of
course
Then
we
=
X,
closed
a
=
4.1.3,
Then
Lie
any Rie)
M(X),
subgroup
El (E
fibre
with
H,
complex Abelian
complex
bundle
in-
form
an
A connected
Theorem 4.1.5.
using
By Proposition
(Cn IE)IA*.
:=
have
Ker(fl).
=
ample Riemann For a quasi-Abelian variety. can see that p* : M(Xi) we
A) (E + A)/A is X1 (Ker q) is a fibre
n
E R such
C'
:
)
), X, Ker(H).
isomorphism
an
Ker p o:
X
o:
=
HE
Riemann form
a
projection subgroup
discrete
a
epimorphism for X, with ft H, o ( duces
exists
canonical
of
A) (cf.
n
HIRZEBRUCH[45]). Next
we
show the
quasi-Abelian above.
(3).
property
Y, and let
variety
For any x,
E
Let
Xi,
p
is constant
T
-r :
we can
for
x
a/
some :
X,
Since
)
4.1.10 Let
define
&)
with
a
Since
)
X,
It
xi.
is
E
a
=
fibration
in
If it
given is not
so,
a
the
there
meromorphically separable f (T(x)) 54 f (T(x')).
the fibre a
that
homomorphism with
is onto,
into
such that
mapping obvious
homomorphism
o-1 (xi).
Y is
M(Y) on
a
be the
the fibre
on
holomorphic
=
Y be another
X
o:
X,
E
Therefore
Y be
X
p-1 (xi) with T(x) 0 T(x'). Theorem (Main 3.2-21), we can take f However f o T E M(X) must be constant x, x'
exist
X
:
:
p-
=
(xi),
X, a'
a
contradiction.
Y by a(xi) := T(x) homomorphism. Let
)
is
o-
T
1
a o
p.
Then
o-
o
o
o7'
=
o
p.
Q.E.D.
u.
Corollary
X be
a
toroidal
group.
Then
M(X)
=
C iff
X has
no
Riemann form.
Proof If
there
exists
a
Riemann
form
for
X,
then'
the
quasi-Abelian
variety
X,
Automorphic
4.1
M(X)
M(Xi)
--
Conversely, f
0 by L.
there
that
f
exists
take
can
we
with
Thus
dimensional.
positive
is
L
bundle
(CO)-(C4),
conditions
function
X and two
-4
H must be
sections
determined
form
Hermitian
H be the
Let
meromorphic
non-constant
a
line
a
W10.
=:
the
L satisfies
Since
X,
---+
C.
Then
Ho (X, L)
E
X
:
o
103
Riemarm form
a
Q.E.D.
X.
for
meromorphic
The
but
varieties, It
54
suppose
M(X).
E
W,
reduction
meromorphic
the
in
forms
can
variety quasi-Abelian the meromorphic
this
well-known,
is
degree
of CHOW, if
n
reduce
the
t in
limits
quasi-Abelian
of
point. a complex
a
of
0 < t
1, hence the
to
field
function
those
are
groups
can
that
have any transcendental
orem
of toroidal
fields
function
n
reduction
torus
group
by
given
a
The-
have any such
can
dimension.
only
has
which
Example:
[64]
1964
KOPFERMANN gave in constants
as
generates
a
toroidal
,F2 tv 5 i.\,F3 i 001iV7
C'1A
=
i
i
0 10
=
X
group
group
coordinates 100
P
toroidal
non-compact
a
functions.
meromorphic
in standard
The basis
example of
an
on
which
meromorphic
all
functions
are
constant.
automorphic
of
Existence
forms
and Lefschetz In this
section
morphic
and Lefschetz
sections
Werefer X
C'/A
=
over
X. As
form
H is
there
exists
compact
have
a
toroidal
seen
Khhler
form
manifolds,
Unfortunately,
on
in
the
the
Then
Consider
group.
in Theorem
definite
more
Our purpose
manifolds.
groups.
need
general give the
only results
state
we
is to
here.
proofs.
for
papers a
positive
Khhler
&9-Lemma. groups.
we
be
toroidal
about
original
the
to
type
of holo-
existence
proofs
His
theorems.
weakly 1-complete
for
knowledge
systematical
of TAKAYAMAon the
results
recent
state
and technic
results
Let
we
theorems
type
a
if L is
3.2.13,
holomorphic positive,
MCA, equivalently the
Chern
'first
converse
is
shown
89-Lemma does not
KAZAMAand TAKAYAMA[54]
proved
on
that
by
in a
general
toroidal
words,
other
H'(X,R). of
virtue
hold for
E
Hermitian
its
In
C'.
cl(L)
class
L
bundle
line
then
the
For
so-called
for group
toroidal X the
104
Reduction
4.
00-Lemma holds
following
the
X, iff
on
X is
[1101)
in
L be
3.1
[110])
in
TAKAYAMA[110]
group.
proved
weak 09(9-Lemma
the
using
of the A9-Lemma.
instead
holomorphic
a
determines
line
Hermitian
a
the
above
H
on
any
proposition
(Theorem
manifolds
conditions 1. L is
toroidal
a
Suppose
relatively
X
group
that
H is
TAKAYAMAproved
which
definite
positive
for
theorem
Cn/A
=
compact open subset
ampleness
an
[109]),
6.6 in
H be the
L and
on
on
Cn.
on
on
of X.
weakly
1-complete
the
(TAKAYAMA [110])
Theorem
4.1.12
bundle
form
MCA. Then, L is positive
Let
theta
Proposition
4.1.11
By
toroidal
a
(Theorem
proposition
(Lemma 3.14 Let
and Extension
same
as
Proposition
in
following
Then the
4.1.11
two
equivalent:
are
positive,
2. H is
positive
About
the
definite
MCA
on
of
existence
non-trivial
the
sections
following
is
conjecture
well-
known:
Conjecture.
Let
determines
a
non-trivial
section.
Partial
results
conjecture
form
non-trivial
a
a
toroidal on
X which
group
MCA,
by COUSIN [26] and ABE [8]. Recently general case by TAKAYAMA.
then
L has
a
the mentioned
in the
line
Suppose
bundle that
on
H is
a
toroidal
definite
positive
X which
group
on
determines
a
MCA. Then L has
a
complex
linear
HO(X, L) has the infinite
space
dimension,
if
X
compact. bundle
line
with
connection
4.1.14
type
any
a
the
3.10).
to
one-to-one
be very
ample,
if
HO(X, L)
immersion)
holomorphic
into
existence
of
sections,
TAKAYAMAproved
the
following
(TAKAYAMA [110]) line
bundle
on
a
toroidal
group
X.
Then
L'
is very
ample
t > 3.
TAKAYAMAimproved
Theorem
a
said
space.
positive
integer
X is
theorem.
Theorem
L be
L
embedding (i.e.
a
Lefschetz
Let
on
definite
(TAKAYAMA [110])
holomorphic complex projective
In
for
the
holomorphic
gives
bundle
line
section.
Moreover,
A
H.
holomorphic
known
holomorphic
a
Hermitian
a
form H. If H is positive
proved
was
L be
is not
were
Theorem
4.1.13
Let
L be
Hermitian
the
above theorem
in
the
next
paper
(Theorem
3.4
and
Automorphic
4.1
Let 1. 2.
X be
a
toroidal
L is very L
2
is very
that
The second Theorem
[85)
with
group
ample, if
X is
ample,
if there
(A, LIA)
is
statement
for
105
(TAKAYAMA [111])
Theorem
4.1.15
forms
a
bundle
line
L. Then
torusless,
principally in
positive
the
the compact
does not exist
polarized
a
Abelian
above theorem case.
non-trivial
is
subtorus
A of X such
variety.
known
as
OHBUCHI's Lefschetz
Extendable
4.2
A toroidal
dles
group
bundles,
the
and next
X
1.1.14
=
Cn/A
that
bundle
on
of fibre
has structures
a
q-dimensional
(Iq i )
phism
Cn
p:
gives Cq
P(Z1 Then
p(A)
subgroup Lie
groups.
7
)
...
Zn)
is the
properly
In-q
of X
as
:=
Cq
We define
T.
(Zl)
e(Zq+l),
Zq,
...
follows
a
ical
We define
projection.
X
homomor-
group
e(zn)).
....
pn-q 1
X
automorphisms. point
)lp(A).
an
Cq
pn-q 1
complex projective
and fix
pn-q 1
(Cq
commutative
X
one-dimensional
discontinuous
in
C*n-q-principal as
X
,
manifold
seen
)
i
R, R2 torus
We have
q.
by
for the group of these extended is
of type
P of A is written
Iq
0
a
n:
where P,
(
bun-
f.
on Cq subgroup of Cq X C*n-q and acts naturally X Thus C*n-q have -_ we automorphisms. (Cq X )lp(A) Any 77 E p(A) can be extended to an automorphism
is
of
C*n-q
X
=
line
of C"'-fibre
case
bundles
representation
a
q-dimensional
a
of kind
group
The basis
torus.
p
The basis
toroidal
define
coordinates
extendable
the
discuss
of C*n-q-fibre
case
non-compact
a
We can consider
We first
Riemann forms
ample
with
case
be
toroidal
bundles.
of fibrations.
The Let
bundles
compactification
each
in
line
embedding
-k t
X
p(A)
of
gives
a
also
Cq
on
be the
X
through
X
P(A) pn-q 1
complex
compact
pn-q 1
X
:
complex
as
We write
space.
Then it Cq
:
as a
7
The action
free.
Let
C*n-q
canon-
following
the
diagram Cn
P
Cq
X
pn-q 7r
X
where
ir
:
Cn
Now, consider on
t(X).
The
X
=
Cn /A is the
X
projection.
holomorphic line bundle L, on problem was studied by following a
We see X. Then
t(X)
(t-')*Ll
=,k(Cq is
X
a
C*n-q).
line
M. STEIN 1994 in his thesis
bundle
[108].
When is there
Problem.
(t-')*Ll in this
The results Take
a
subset
p(l)
:=
Cq
Ll,.(x)
-_
section
n
(Xq+I(I)
X
(I) is c X(I)
Xp
qJ. Letting F := where x X,,(I)),
-
...
have
t(X)
The
projection
&
Consider
X(r)
line
holomorphic
a
Cq
=
p(J)
X
OL of L
pull-back
The
C*, d,\(z)
(I)), we =fr(Cn).
Xp
the
t(X)
space
of the
q variables
first
bundle
Cn-q -fibre
T and the
given
p(A)
X(I)
by
(Cq
X
I C
p(p)
n
-
q}.
Since
factor
automorphic
an
X
with
C*.
on
factor
given by the automorphic
X is
d
:
A
x
Cn
ap(,x)(p(z)).
:=
L, A
)
x
X be
Cn
)
(t-')*Ll
with and
:
_k (Cq
X (I)
Letting
Lemma
4.2.2
:
X
Lemma
4.2.1
0
L
Cq
set
lemma is obvious.
following
Let
bundle
we
i(CqxP(J1,...,n-qJ))
X:=
a
Cn , L is
-
a :
The
.
Cq onto
bundle
q} \ I,
-
if i E Ic.
OfCqXpn-q
pn-q 1
-principal
\ 101
P,
Wealso define X
n
T.
)
:
Cq
:
C*n-q
the
induces
.
c
&
with
on
if i E I
C :=
open subset
an
L
?
Xq+i(I) Then Cq
bundle
line
107
due to M. STEIN.
are
I C
X
holomorphic
a
bundles
line
Extendable
4.2
an
a
C*.
holomorphic
line
Then there
exists
Ll,(x),
c:--
automorphic
iff
factor
there a :
a
exist
p(A)
x
factor
given by an automorphic line bundle L holomorphic
bundle
function
holomorphic
a
(Cq
p(l))
X
W(z+A),3,\(z) o(z)-'=ap(,\)(p(z))
)
V
:
X (I)
Cn
C*
C* such that
f6rall(A,z)C:Ax
Cn.
Proof If
(t-')*Ll
_-
LJ,(X),
then
automorphic
be the
factor
L,
2!
which
t*(Ll,(X)). defines
Let L.
a :
Then
p(A)
a o
(Cq
X
p and
0
X are
p(J))
C*
by
cobordant
Lemma4.2.1.
The
is
converse
Let the line
:
A
x
proved by the
Cn
bundle
)
on
of Cn. Weconsider
(C)
C* be
a
same
reduced
X determined
the
following
Q.E.D.
lemma.
by )3.
theta
factor
of type
Take the canonical
condition:
ImH(A,ej)=OforallAEAandq+l<j:5n.
(H, p), unit
Lp
and let
vectors
el,
.
.
.
be ,
en
108
Reduction
4.
and Extension
Lemma
4.2.3
Let
0: A
the
condition
line
bundle
C* be
C'
X
(C),
then
for
X(I)
L
reduced
a
any I
f 1,
C
(t-1)*Lp
with
factor
theta .
.
.
n
,
-
of type
q}
there
(H, p)
which
exists
a
satisfies
holomorphic
Lj,(X).
_-
Proof decomposition
Wehave the
Cn
=
(el,...'eq)c
where MCA =
have Im HI RA X V
of the choice
MCA(D V (D W RA (D W)
-::-
=
and V
0. We may
Hlivxv.
of Im
that
means
the
assumption
we
0 because of the freedom
f6r1 0.
We set
Z(J) Then
:=
jor
E
Zn-q;
F-aEZ(I) fie((u,
or,
z"))
< 0
is
for
convergent
on
or
Cn-q
o-j
.
> 0 for
For
any
some
a
j
E Zn-q
define ax,,
e((u, All))
for
some
A E A with
E
e((u, A")) :A
1.
Icl. \ 101
we
that
We note
\ 101
Z,-q
\ 101
EZn-q
or
and Extension
Reduction
4.
112
U,
=
such that
f (Z)
and there
Z(1),
C
a
Z (I)
f,
fi.
=
E
:=
11,
I C
exists
n
q}
-
for
any
Then
f,
e
((o-, z11))
0rEZn-q\f0J converges
Cn-q
on
f (z
+
A)
+
and satis-fies
,
a,\(z)
f (z)
-
[a,\,, a.\,
a,\(z)
Thus
1)] e((u, z"))
-
+ a.\,o
o.
is cobordant
to
homomorphism A
a
E) A
Q.E.D.
E C.
a.\,o
F-+
Theorem
4.2.9
L, be
Let
A"))
f,(e((tT,
+
holomorphic
a
holomorphic
satisfying In
this
L,
!--
line the
case,
L',
o,*
L
where
o-
take :
toroidal
on a
(t-')*Ll
with
on
X. Then there
group
Ll,,(X),
-
iff
L, is
exists
theta
a
a
bundle
(C).
condition we can
bundle
line
bundle
T is
X
L'
bundle
theta
a
C*n-q
a
T
on
-principal
flZ2q
Cql(jq
=
that
such
bundle.
Proof Assume that
Ll,,(X). the
By
there
exists
Lemma 4.2.7
representation
holomorphic
a
satisfies
L,
We have
above.
as
by
line
Theorem 4.2.5.
is
a
theta
In this
type the
a
(H, p).
we
may
assume
Furthermore
A E A and a,,...,
)
C*
first
by
has the desired The
converse
that
we
of Lemma4.2.3,
space of the
Cq
L,
Let
L
bundle
line
L'
=
0
c-_
Lo
-k
on
be
with
Then
is cobordant
,o(A for
(C).
(t-')*Ll
with
on
to
0 L-
A
C*.
reduced
theta
homomorphism
a
:
Hence L,
bundle.
case,
proof
4.2.8
L
holomorphic
a
(L By Proposition
bundle
condition
the
i.e.
may
=
a,,-q
Let
Then :=
3,\(z).
where 3 is that
+
On
an-qen)
Cn
we can
define
The theta
a
H and Q have the
independent
H is
E Z.
Lp,
assume
+ a, eq+1 +
q variables.
a',(,\)(&(z))
L,
)
Zq+l, =
-
-
properties
of in
and
Q(A)
Cq be the a
Zn
-,
factor
theta
bundle
projection
factor L'
a/:(Iq
onto
flZ2q
T defined
the X
by a'
property. is obvious.
Q.E.D.
The
A toroidal
principal
bundle
Cn/A
=
as seen
of type
before.
of kind
q has the
It has of
113
f of the natural
structure
other
course
bundles
fibrations.
In this
C*n-qsection
we
associated problem of line bundle concerning the fibration f. form of kind We Riemann must some modify parts of the ample
the extension
consider with
X
group
case
line
Extendable
4.2
an
in the
argument
[12]
used in
previous
study
to
The results
section.
in this
section
admitting
functions
meromorphic
are
due to ABE and
algebraic
an
addition
theorem. of type q (1 < q < n), and let L, quasi-Abelian variety Theorem 3.1.4 we have the decomposition it. on a positive By L, L, 0 LO, where L, is defined by a reduced theta factor ?9,x of type (H, g) trivial. and LO is topologically Then H is an ample Riemann form (Theorem definite that H is positive We assume on Cn (Lemma 3.1.7). By 4.1.12). may of theta factor, there exist extension Lemma 3.1.8 and the natural a discrete subgroup A of rank 2n and a theta factor 0_ on A x Cn such that ?9,\ is the and A of restriction on A x Cn, A c A as subgroup Cn/A is an Abelian Let
X
Cn/A
=
be
be
a
bundle
line
=
=
variety. Now we
by Hn the Siegel
Wedenote 4.2.10
Let
Normal
P and
1
(0 half
upper
< V
some
that
bA,, (x')e((u,
Id"))
x"
UEZ-q-V
I:
[a,x,, (x', X11/)
+
I,
(x'
A, x"'
+
..
+ A
O-EZ-9-2f n-i
f,, (x,
-
x
)] e((u, x"Id"))
...
k.7
-7
+
dj
j=q+f+l
By (2) and (3)
(4) for
ax, all
some
(5)
o-
j
,
t
+
f,,(x'
A', x"'
+
Un-q-2f)
(Ul
+ A
with
ai
fo, (x'
+
..
A"/d"))
)e((u,
< 0 for
fi(xl,X111)
-
some
E I
i
=
(x', x1l')
a.\,o
+
go
9,(X)
A', x"'
+ A
(x)
:=
fo' (x',
21 ),
Y-
:=
fo, (x',
..
x
for
o,,