TOPICS IN ARITHMETICAL FUNCTIONS
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
NORTH-HOLLAND MATHEMATICS STUDIES
43
Notasde ...
35 downloads
663 Views
9MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
TOPICS IN ARITHMETICAL FUNCTIONS
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
NORTH-HOLLAND MATHEMATICS STUDIES
43
Notasde Maternatica (72) Editor: Leopoldo Nachbin Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and University of Rochester
Topics in Arithmetical Functions Asymptotic formulae for sums of reciprocals of arithmetical functions and related results
J.-M. DE KONINCK University of Lava1 Quebec, Canada and
A. lVlc University of Belgrade Belgrade, Yugoslavia
1980
NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY - AMSTERDAM
NEW YORK
OXFORD
North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrievalsystem, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright o wner.
ISBN: 0444860495
Publishers: NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM NEW YORK OXFORD Sole distributors for the U.S.A.and Canada: ELSEVIER NORTH-HOLLAND, INC. 5 2 VANDERBILT AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017
PRINTED IN THE NETHERLANDS
INT RO DU CT ION
The object of this monograph is to examine several topics in the
theory of arithmetical functions. The principal topic to be studied is that of asymptotic formulae for the sum
where f ( n ) is a non-negative arithmetical function, and the sununation is over those n not exceeding
P
for which f ( n ) * O
.
These sums possess
an intrinsic interest apart from their number-theoretic applications. Two of the most interesting classes of arithmetical functions, namely multiplicative and additive functions, require different techniques for the estimation of (1). Since the reciprocal of a multiplicative function is itself multiplicative, we see that for the case of multiplicative functions f , the estimation of (1) may be regarded as a special case of the estimation of
where g ( n ) is multiplicative. Since an extensive literature already exists for this problem, we will deal with reciprocals of multiplicative functions in Chapter 1 only. There, we use important analytic tools such
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
vi
as the convolution method and the method of complex integration in order to prove the basic Lemma 1.1, which is repeatedly used in later chapters. When f is additive, the sum (1) is much more difficult to estimate, and no significant results were hown for a long time. The first h o r n result is due to R.L. Duncan C11, who proved the inequality
(3)
A general method for estimating reciprocals of additive functions
was introduced by the first named author in his 1972 doctoral dissertation at Temple University, Pa., parts of which appeared in De Koninck C11. This method, which rests on the fact that zf(n)
is multiplicative whenever f
is additive, is explained in Chapter 2 and yields improvements of (3) to
(4)
Z I
n a
l/w(n) = A1x/loglog3c t.. .tA~/(loglogz)'t
O(x/(loglogz)'tl)
,
where IV is arbitrary but fixed, A 1 = l , and the remaining Ails are computable. Subsequent papers, a number of which are due to one or both of the authors, contained further results which give more than enough material for a systematic account of sums of reciprocals of arithmetical functions. This topic seems particularly well suited for a monograph such as this, since it allows treatment in considerable depth without being too wide in scope. Furthermore, this branch of analytic number theory is quite new, and no general self-contained publication has yet appeared on this subject. We have included a number of our hitherto unpublished results, as well as some sharpened asymptotic formulae. In particular, we improve (4)
vii
INTRODUCTION
in Chapter 5 to
where M
is arbitrary but fixed, L .(z) ( j = 1,.. .,M) is a slowly oscil3
lating function admitting an asymptotic expansion of the form
( 6 ) L j (z) a
.(log log z)- '+. . .t aN,3.(log log x)4
1J3
t O(
(log logxrN-l)
,
where all the constants are computable, and N is an arbitrary but fixed integer. Although no claim is made that (5) is the best possible asymptotic formula, it certainly will be difficult to improve. A large number of additive functions arise from the logarithms of
positive multiplicative functions. In Chapter 3 we give asymptotic formulae for reciprocals of logarithms of some of the most important multiplicative functions. In addition we establish asymptotic formulae for reciprocals of many interesting additive functions. The methods we develop are also used t o estimate
(7)
where both g and f are additive; this is the subject considered in Chapter 4. We have devoted Chapter 7 to the study of reciprocals in "short" intervals. These are sums of the type
J . M . DE KONINCK
viii
AND
A. IVIC
where the interval is "short" in the sense that h
o(z)
as x+-
.
The
method used allows us to obtain estimates for other sums as well, such as
(9)
A (z,h) =
4
1 1 , zwath,f(n) =q
where q is a fixed integer, and f is a suitable arithmetical function. This estimate is established by using both general results and methods of analytic number theory. We hope that digressions of this sort will make the book more interesting for the general reader. Even in these digressions, "reciprocals of arithmetical functions" remains the thread which
holds the whole together. Analytic methods are also employed in Chapter 8 to estimate
where f belongs to a certain class of non-negative additive functions, and
9
is a suitable subset of the set of natural numbers. It is only
in Chapter 6 that the analytic approach is abandoned, and special elementary methods are used to deal with large additive functions such as
, B(n)
1
ap
.
Apart from the asymptotic formula (Theo-
Pal In
rem 6 . 2 )
the results are not as sharp as those obtained in other chapters, although we are certain that sharper results (such as those stated as open problems in Chapter 9) can be obtained.
INTRODUCTION
ix
This monograph does not resolve all the major problems connected with asymptotic formulae for reciprocals of arithmetical functions. In fact we give a list of open problems in the last chapter. It is our modest hope that this monograph will induce further research in this interesting field. Although this book is intended primarily for specialists, we think that it will be of interest to the more general reader as well. Apart from a general knowledge of analytic number theory and the theory of arithmetical functions, which may be found in a number of standard texts such as Hardy and Wright C11, Ayoub 111, Grosswald C11, etc., the reader needs only to possess a basic knowledge of calculus and of complex analysis. The text is, with some minor exceptions, completely self-contained; we have tried to make the exposition as clear as possible, without omitting important details, by deleting routine calculations and repetition of similar arguments. Each chapter is followed by a section of Notes, where all necessa-
ry clarifications and discussions are given, together with appropriate references. We have tried to include in these references all the papers which deal with asymptotic formulae for reciprocals of arithmetical functions and related topics. The notation is kept standard throughout and is fully explained in the next section. A number of mathematicians have kindly read the manuscript and have made many useful critical remarks and suggestions. We take this opportunity to thank Dr. E. Brinitzer-Scriba, Professor P. Erdos, Professor
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
X
E. Grosswald, Professor G. Lord, and Professor H. Lord.
We would like to express our appreciation to Facult6 des Sciences et de Ggnie, Universitd Laval, Quebec, and to Mathematical Institute of Belgrade and Repub. Zaj. of Serbia for their financial support of the technical preparation of the monograph. Finally we wish to thank Ms.Louise Papillon who typed the final camera-ready text with considerable care and speed.
Jean-Marie De Koninck
Aleksandar Ivi6
Mpartement de Mathhatiques
Rudarsko-geolozki fakultet
Universitd Laval
Universiteta u Beogradu
Qugbec, G1K 7P4
Djugina 7, 11000 Belgrade
Canada
Yugoslavia
NOTAT I ON
Owing to the nature of this monograph no attempt has been made to secure absolute consistency in the use of notation. The following summary explains some of the most common symbols and functions used; all other necessary notation will be specified within the body of the text.
natural numbers (positive integers).
k , Z,m,n:
p:
a prime number (without exception). the greatest integer not exceeding the real number
[z]:
1
nS?:
n
the empty sum is defined to be equal to zero. : a product taken over all primes p
not exceeding z ; the empty
product is defined to be equal to unity.
1' g ( n ) / f ( n ) :
na
z
n:
a sum taken over all natural numbers n not exceeding
for which f ( n ) z 0
.
a product taken over all primes.
P
(m,n) : the greatest common divisor of m dl n : d divides n
pal In : pa
:
and n
.
.
divides n
n:Z(modk) : k l ( n - Z )
f
.
: a sum taken over all natural numbers n not exceeding z ;
P a
d n
z
, but
pat'
does not.
.
a sum taken over all divisors of n
xi
(including 1 and n ) .
xii
J.M.
f
:
DE KONINCK AND A. I V I C
a sum taken over a l l primes that divide n
P n
d(n)
f 1 : the number of divisors of n
d n
.
.
dk(n) : the number of ways n can be written a s a product of
k
factors.
+(n) =
1 1 : Euler's t o t i e n t function, which represents the msn, (m, n ) =I number of positive integers coprime with n and less than n
.
a ( n ) : the number of f i n i t e non-isomorphic abelian groups with n elements. :
the sum of a l l divisors of
n
a(n)
i
n
: the number of d i f f e r e n t prime factors of
Pn G(n)
.
1
a :
I i:"" .
the number of t o t a l p r i m factors of n
Pal In
p ( n ) : the IGbius function defined by p(n) =
.
1
n=l
(-l)r
n=p,. . .p,,pi's different primes
otherwise
0
A(n) : the von Mangoldt function defined by
a
A(n) =
n=p otherwise
P(n) : the number of unrestricted p a r t i t i o n s of a positive integer n .
n
a(n)
p : the greatest square-free divisor of
n
P In 8(n)
T
: the sum of d i s t i n c t prime divisors of
P n
B(n)
1
up : the sum of a l l prime factors of
n
n
.
.
.
Pal In B1(n) =
1
p a : the sum of d i s t i n c t prime powers t h a t exactly d i -
Pal In
vide n
.
NOTATION
xiii
.
p ( n ) : the greatest prime divisor of n
e(x)
=
$(XI
=
~ ( x )
cm P c A(n) n*
PQ
11
PQ
:
*
the number of primes not exceeding x
.
x : a real variable. : complex variables (Res and
z,s
parts of
s
t = Ims)
.
~ ( s ):
Ims
denote the real and imaginary
respectively; common notation u
Res
and m
Riemann's zeta function defined for Re s > 1 by
~ ( s =)
1 n-' ,
n=l
otherwise by analytic continuation. x ( n ) : character modulo a fixed natural number k
x,(n) : principal character modk ; x,(n)
=
.
1 if (n,k)
1
otherwise.
zero
m
r ( z ) : the Gamma function defined for Rez > 0
by r ( z )
=
J
tz-' e-tat,
0
otherwise by analytic continuation. X
.
expx=e y
:
p
m
Euler's constant, defined as +
y
$(x,y)
c (log(1
P
- Up)
1
t
-
y
J
e logx.dx=O.5772157
-x
.
Up)
1 : the number of positive integers n not ex-
n5xc,p (n)59
ceeding x all of whose prime factors do not exceed y
f(x)
- g(x)
as x
f(x) = O(g(x)) constant
... .
+
xo means l i m f(x)lg(x)
=
.
1
33x
means D O
.
lf(x)
I
5
Cg(x)
Here f(x)
for x a o and some absolute
is a complex function of a real
xiv
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. I V I e i s a positive function f o r z z o
variable, and g(z)
f(z)
1/2 , we obtain by partial
summation
for every A r O and every
E >
0 , which gives (1.31) after collecting terms
. .
x logl/k-i2 for i = 1 ,2,.. ,N
For another application of the convolution method we now consider a(n)
, the number of non-isomorphic abelian groups with
n elements. This
function is multiplicative and prime-independent, which means that a (pa)
, and not on p tricted) partitions of n , then
depends only on a
a@")
(1.32)
and in particular a ( p ) = 1 Dirichlet series of l/a(n)
t
p-s
P
-2s + ++ t
l
t ____
t
t
a (PIP"
-4s
-3s
t
,
= 2 for every prime p
n (1
n=l n(1 P
is the number of (unres-
.
Thus the
is
1 l/a(n) . n-S
A(s) =
If P ( n )
P(a)
, a(p2)
m
(1.33)
.
t...)
1 / 2
.
Changing
>
we see that (1.34)
A ( s ) = s(s)cs(zs)l-1~2w(s) ,
where
is absolutely convergent for Re s
>
1/3
.
From
we have by the uniqueness theorem for Dirichlet series
whence
s
to 2s
RECIPFWALS OF MULTIPLICATIVE FWCI'IONS
15
so that m
where
1 h ( n ) n-'
n=l
.
= [ 0 / 2
z(xU - 1)
1 > u logx > u2
t o x1 = u - l q 2 > 3/2 = (logu
rl
.
,
.
-1 -1
)
, and
Then
since f o r
we obtain
,
which gives log(1 3/2
t
x-l(xU - l ) - l ) log-hxax
l o g ( l / u ) - ~ l o g - ~ z 1
, log(1
t
u
-1
z (z
-
-1 u 1)-l) < z (z
-
1)-l
zulogz
t z
2
ulogz2 =
v ) 2 1 - v / 2 (0 < v < 1)
-1
.
with v
we deduce t h a t log(1
f o r z2
.
5 z 5 z
3
+
( . ( X U
and u
- l))-l)
- 1 ) ) - l (1
t ( . ( X U
small enough, and t h a t
u l o g r s ulogz3 =
U(0q
-2
)
o(n)
so that xu
-
- 1 < (1 t
rl)
u logz
.
,
n/2)
(xutl - 2 )
-1
,
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. IVI6
20
X
3
x-l(logx)-h-lh
X
h-1(log-hx2-log-hx3)
= k - l u h - h -1 IT k t l
2
This gives
which combined with (1.45) proves (1.44). From (1.44) and (1.42) we obtain, as u + O t G(u)
,
u-l(log u -1) -1 t O(o-'(logu -1) - 2 log logo-')
which implies (1.40)
.
As already remarked, Theorem 1.4 follows then direc-
t l y from Lema 1 . 2 and (1.40).
RECIPROCALS OF MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS
21
NOTES
As remarked in the Introduction, the aim of our monograph is to study asymptotic formulae for
1'
(1.47)
n-
llf(n)
,
where f ( n ) is an arithmetical function of a certain interest. Therefore we restrain from studying
1
n*
f(n)
for multiplicative functions f
,
though this problem is one of the most interesting and important topics in analytic number theory, and we give estimates for (1.47) in the case of several interesting multiplicative functions f only. For the sake of completeness, however, we mention here the following sharpest known asymptotic formulae for some familiar multiplicative functions: (1.48)
(1.50)
The first two of the above formulae are due to A. Walfisz C11, while (1.50) is proven in the forthcoming paper of G. Kolesnik C11 (see Chapter 7 for a more extensive discussion concerning (1.50)).
As a general result concerning summatory functions of multiplicative functions we mention the following result of E. Wirsing C11, which
has wide applications and has initiated subsequent research: Let f ( n ) be a non-negative multiplicative function for which
22
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVI6
for some constants c1
>
0
as x+m for some T T O
.
a 2
2
,0
5
c2 < 2
and all primes p
and integers
, and let
Then, as x+-
,
Formula (1.1) may be found in Montgomery C11. The more general sum
2'
nQ, (n,I ) =1
1/$(n)
is investigated in Halberstam-Richert C 1 1 , Chapter 3 ,
95, and has an application to the so-called Titchmarsh divisor problem of
estimating
I:
l 1 is a fixed real number.
CHAPTER 2 RECIPROCALS OF "SMALL" ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
11. Introduction
An arithmetical function f is additive if ffmn) = ffm) + f f n J whenever m and n are coprime integers. The problem of finding an estimate for
1
n-
f(n)
, where f is additive, can be approached in the following manner:
29
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
30
For many well-known additive functions f the sum mated, the double sum order than x ( 1 ,
t
c;)
l2
.
This approach allows
1 f(n)
n<x
1, - x
converges, while
1, 1,
can be easily estit
1,
is of lower
to obtain fairly accurate estimates for
LIS
for a large class of additive functions f
, and
so, for example,
we obtain
1 w (n)
2
n 2
log log x
t p
x
0(x/log x)
t
,
(2.3)
where
1 (log(1
y t
P
P
- l/p)
-k
Up)
.
On the other hand, if f is additive, there is no obvious way t o obtain an estimate for sums of the type
1'
nSx
.
l/f(n)
The purpose of this
chapter is to show how one can obtain precise estimates for sums of reciprocals of "small" additive functions (among which we find the functions w
and Q ) . This class of "small" additive functions will be defined more
precisely in 53. Actually our approach will yield an asymptotic expansion of the form
1'
nSx
l/f(n)
x
a
1
Ai/(loglogr)i
t
i=1
O(x/(loglogx)atl)
,
where a is any preassigned positive integer and the Ails are computable constants depending only on f
,
We will also show that our method allows
LIS
to estimate certain
1' g(n) / f ( n ) , where g is multiplicative and f is nsc additive.. Finally we will extend our method to study asymptotic expansions
sums of the form
SMALL ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS for
52.
1'
nsx
l/(f(n))k
31
, for an arbitrary positive integer
k
.
The method.
If f is an arbitrary additive arithmetical function, then, for an arbitrary complex number t * 0 , t f ( n ) is a multiplicative arithmetical function.
If g ( n ) is a multiplicative function, it is, in many cases,
possible to estimate
1g ( n )
using complex integration.
1111:
The idea that we will use is the following: given an arbitrary arith-
Ift f ( n ) for real t~ C0,ll (where nsx the prime in the sum indicates that the sum is taken over all nlz: for
metical function f ( n )
which f ( n ) s 0)
.
, let
Suppose that
(2.4)
F(2,t)
with R ( x , t )
F(z,t) =
O(H(z,t))
G(s,t) t R(z,t)
holds uniformly for t e [0,11
and H(z,t) are integrable functions of t z+-
.
, and
, where
C(z,t)
~(z,t) ~(C(z,t))
as
Then, using ( 2 . 4 ) , we have
One would like to integrate the sum in ( 2 . 5 ) with respect t o t between 0 and 1 and get
J . M . DE KONINCK
32
AND
A. IVI6
Integrating i n a similar way the r i g h t side of ( 2 . 5 ) , one would hope t o get the desired estimate f o r
1'
l/f(n)
n a
.
In most cases, however, the r i g h t side of (2.5) w i l l be unbounded i n the neighborhood of between 0 and 1
t =0
, so
t h a t it i s impossible t o integrate it
. between
To overcome t h i s d i f f i c u l t y , we shall integrate ~ ( z ) and
1
, where
~(z) 0 -f
, as
z-fm
.
We then obtain
If we integrate i n the same manner the r i g h t side of ( 2 . 5 ) and show, by a proper choice of
~ ( z ), that f o r
z
s u f f i c i e n t l y large the second sum i n
( 2 . 6 ) is small compared t o the integrated r i g h t side of (2.5),
obtain the desired estimate of
1'
n a
l/f(n)
we then
.
An estimate l i k e ( 2 . 4 ) is not always possible f o r
F(z,t)
.
But
using a r e s u l t of A. Selberg (Lemma 2.1), we w i l l find a large c l a s s of functions f o r which G ( z , t ) on C0,ll
D ( t ) z logt-'z
, where
D(t)
is continuous
and H(z,t) = ~ l o g ' - ~ z, and t o t h i s class of functions we w i l l
be able t o apply the above method.
13. Selberg's r e s u l t and basic definitions.
Before we define the class o f functions t o which we w i l l apply the method outlined i n Section 2 , we w i l l prove Selberg's r e s u l t .
With our
SMALL ADDITIVE FUNCl'IONS
33
notation, and the r e s t r i c t i o n t o the p a r t i c u l a r case needed here, it may be stated a s follows: m
Lemna 2.1.
Let g ( s , t ) =
1bt(n)/ns
n=l
f o r Res
m
1 Ibt(n) 1n-l log3 2n
be uniformly bounded f o r
n=l
m
(s(s))tg(s,t)
=
uniformly f o r
It
Proof.
1
n=l
I
for
a,(n)/n"
s 1
u>1
.
It
I
5
1
.
u>1
, and
let
Next, set
Then
.
,x2 2
Using Lemma 1.1 with N = 1
, and defining
D,(x)
1dt(n) n a
we obtain
W e have, since
Ibt(n) I 17 (log 2n) 3
n=l
0
and E
>
0
, both
f o r a l l x > X and a l l
i t x)
t E C0,ll
independent of t e
=
C0,ll
o(
.
dt
.
.
Recall t h a t
R(r,t)
This means t h a t there e x i s t
t
, such
t h a t IR(x, t )I < B x logt-2x,
Hence, f o r x s u f f i c i e n t l y large,
X
(log log x)
1'
Combining (2.13), (2.18) and (2.19), we obtain
1' ?la
1
fo
which is the desired result.
Q
1
Ai
i=1 ( l o g l o g x )
+.
X
1,
ol(loglogz)Q+~
42
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
15. Applications'of the main theorem.
With the help of Lemma 2.1, we will now apply Theorem 2.4 to some well known functions. Theorem 2.5.
1'
n*
where al
1
a
a
i c iJxT i=l (log logz){
1
, a2
= 1- p
X
(log log x)atl),
, and the remaining
3
ails are computable cons-
tants. Proof. It is clear that, for u > 1 and
It I
5
1
,
Let (2.20) 1 seen to be a holomorphic function of s for a > 2 Indeed, if a > l , we have
then
g(s, t ) i s
(where the argument es (2.21).
logg(s,t)
of logg(s, t ) is chosen so that
= t c log
P
- TI
0
Therefore g(s, t ) = elogg(s-'t) represents a holomorphic function of 1 for u > 7 (see Apostol C11 p. 394). As
s
satisfies the conditions of
mentioned by Selberg C11, g(s,t)
t w ( n )and we obtain
L e m 2.1; hence a t ( n )
(2.22)
.
nl?:
uniformly for It1
s
1
.
We can now make use of (2.22) in order to apply Theorem 2.4. We first have to verify that D ( t ) all a
.
It is easily seen that g(1,t)
tion (2.21). Finally, w(1)
Furthermore, l/r(t) 0
, and
w(n)
belongs to CatlCO,ll , f o r
g(l,t)/r(t)
t
Applying Theorem 2.4, we obtain
E
E
CmCO,ll
C"C0,lI
1 for n
f
, from the representa-
, and hence g(l,t)/r(t)~c~rO,lI. 1 . Thus w E Sa , for all a .
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
44
a
a
c
i i=1 (log 1 o g x ) i +-
1 1' nsx Jx=
Ol
X
(log logx)atl
with
For al and a2
, we
(2.23)
1
al
have
D(1)
P
D(t)
D(t) m
-tD'(t) t*
t=l
From (2.21) and (2.22),
n
g w = g(1,l)
ew ( t )
m
t
p v=2 vp
t
I
1 1 (1 - -) (1 t -)
P
P-1
-
= D(1)
D'(1)
t=l
, with vtl v
(-1)
t
p
Hence
with
ri(l)
= -y
(for a proof of t h i s , see Landau Cll p . 138) and
= 1
1-D'(1)
.
SMALL ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
w'(1) = -
1 1 (_,)V+l cp mc ,+cm+c c 7 up p p (p-1) v=2
v=2
1 1 P p(P-1)
1 Ilog(1 - -)p1
t
-11 p
1 { l o g ( l - -) P P
t
-11 P
D'(1) = y
{ l o g ( l - -) 1 P
P
=
45
t
~
-
;r n 1
.
Therefore t
P
t
-11 P
p
and (2.24)
a2
= 1 - p
.
W e w i l l now give a second application of Theorem 2.4.
denotes the t o t a l number of prime f a c t o r s of
n
, then,
If
n(n)
proceeding as i n
the proof of Theorem 2.5, we obtain Theorem 2.6. a
1
.(
X
(log log x ) a + l
where b, = 1
, b2
= 1 - 0-
1 e7 , and the remaining p(P-1
b i t s a r e com-
putable constants. From the preceding two theorems, we have the following corollary. Corollary 2.7. 1
n s iJ3i-J--
L
1
cx -@T= (loglogx)2
3
+ o~(loglogx)~
J.M. LE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
46
with
C =
1-P k1- 1 .
Proof. The proof is immediate from Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 2.6.
86.
A
generalization of the main theorem. Definition 2.4.
Let
g(n)
tf(n) = a,(n)
be the set of all ordered pairs of arith-
S;
which satisfy the following four conditions:
metical functions (g,f)
4)
,
satisfies the conditions of Lemma 2.1, with
~ ( t= )g(l,t)/r(t)
E
.
c~+~co,~I
From this definition, we observe that if (g,f)
uniformly for It I s 1
.
E
S;
, then
Therefore to each ordered pair (g,f)
E S;
we
can associate the function D ( t ) , and, using this function, we define the functions B i ( t )
and A i ( t ) , 1 s i s CL t 2 , as in Definition 2.3.
now state the following theorem. Theorem 2.8.
Let @,f)
E
S;
.
Then
We can
47
SMALL ADDITIVE FLINrnIONS
Proof: Since (g,f)
with R ( z , t )
E
Si
, we have
U(zlogt-2z) uniformly for t
E
C0,ll
, D(t)
E
Cat1CO,11
and
Now
We observe that
-.(
2
)
= o (
3:
(log log z)
(log-)2
lJ
and the proof of the rest of the theorem is entirely similar to the one of Theorem 2.4 and will therefore be omitted.
As an application of Theorem
2.8,
we now state Theorem 2.9, without
proof since its proof follows essentially the same lines as that of Theorem 2.5.
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
48
Theorem 2.9.
where ~ ( n )is the Gbius function, d,
= 6/n2
6
, d,
= -
11 - p
n2
t
1
P
and the remaining d i t s are computable constants.
17.
Estimates for
1 l/(f(n))k
for an arbitrary positive integer k
nsx
In this section, we obtain estimates for
, and
f E S a
k
2' l/(f(n))k
n-
is a fixed positive integer, k s a
.
.
, where
We first make a defi-
nition and prove two lemmas that will be used in the next theorem. Definition 2.5. For t = Bi(t)
'Bi(t)
1,2,
for i
(0,11 , set 1A i ( t ) =
E
...,a t 2
; with A i ( t )
~ ~ (and t )
and B i ( t )
as in De-
finition 2 . 3 . Next, define 2
i-1
1
Bi(t)
(i-j-1)
j=1
and 2 s k
2
~ ~ =( (-l)i-2 t ) 2Bi(t) 5
a
and k A i ( t )
for i = 2 , 3 , ..., a t 2
.
More generally, for
, set
= (-l)i-k* B i ( t )
for i = k , k + l ,...,a t 2
sionally write k ~ i for k~i(l)
.
.
We shall occa-
49
SMALL ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
Lemma 2.10. k s
CL
.
.
(0,ll
and
5
E
(OylI and Proof:
, depending
7
tz
be a positive integer, kAi(t)
5
p t 2
, such
only on f
that
uniformly f o r
k5iscit2 ;
2 ) there e x i s t s a constant N
t
k
Then
I kA i ( t ) I E
let
the corresponding functions
1) there e x i s t s a constant M
t
, and
f E S a
, associate
To f
k s i s a t 2
Let
ksisa
, depending
only on f , such t h a t
.
This lemma i s a generalization of Lemma 2 . 2 , and it follows
hnnediately from Definition 2.5. The following lemma is a generalization of Lemma 2.3.
Lemma 2.11. positive integer.
Proof:
Let
2 2
3
, and
let
~ ( 3 : )5 u
E(Z)
and
Let
u
1
.
Let
B
be a
Then
h(t) =
t t B
.
From the proof of Lemma 2 . 3 , it is
e a s i l y seen that the only two possible maxima of
at
5
, Therefore
h(t)
in
[ED)
ul
are
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
50
W e now e s t a b l i s h a general formula which w i l l help
Let f
Theorem 2.12. t r a r y positive integer,
I'
(2.25)
uniformly f o r u Proof:
E
f (n)
c
, 11
1
t
.
Let k be an arbi-
E
(x))
1
(logx)-20
The proof is by induction on k
and R1(x)
3
0(x(log log x)
, where ~ ( x =)
~ ( x 2) v s 1
(2.10) holds and we have, f o r
R(x,t)
x
P k + l(log logx)cL+l
CE(Z)
2
(1oglogx)i
i=k
3: logU-
let x
Then
=
(f(n))
n*
1
U
.
ksa
, and
Sa
E
us find an es-
.
Since f
E
Sa
, equation
,
a r e the functions defined i n the proof of Theorem 2.4.
R ( x , t ) = O(xlogt-2x)
uniformly f o r
Since 0 < ~ ( x 5) v
1
dt t
5
1
E
[0,11
, and
~ ( x ,)
R1(x)
,
logv - logE(x) = o(l0gE
E (XI
From the definition of
t
-1
(x))
.
0(-1g :2
*
SMALL ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
51
Hence
v
I
(2.27)
O(x logt-2
T h a t R(x, t )
e x i s t a constant B IR(x,t)
I
0
Bx logt-2x
x) uniformly for t
and an X > 0
, for
, both
.
O(ZE(2))
E
C0,ll
means that there
independent of
a l l x > X and t
E
C0,ll
.
Therefore, i f
is s u f f i c i e n t l y large,
0
i s a r b i t r a r y , but fixed.
al and a2
i s given i n the proof of
Theorem 2.5, and similar computations of corresponding constants i n Theo-
rem 2.6 and 2.9 a r e therefore omitted. In Theorem 2 . 9 we could have written
For t h i s , and other elementary properties of the Mobius function
u ( n ) see Grosswald C11, o r Hardy and Wright C11.
CHAPTER 3 RECIPROCALS OF LOGARITHMS OF MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS
51. Functions with main term asymptotic to Cx/logx
.
In this chapter we shall be concerned with asymptotic formulae for nQ
1'
nsx
l/logf(n)
, where f is a positive, multiplicative function, and
denotes summation over those n not exceeding x for which f(n)
>
1.
Most well-how multiplicative functions will be seen to satisfy one of the following:
b)
(3.2)
n a
l/log f( n )
- Cf x/log logz
,
or
f is a positive constant depending on f .
where C
In this section we shall give an asymptotic formula of the type (3.1) f o r a large class of arithmetical functions which includes the functions g ( n ) and o ( n )
.
We begin by making the following
Definition 3.1. Let
be the class of multiplicative functions
f with the property 65
66
DE KONINCK AND A. IVI6
J.M.
, where
f o r all positive integers n
tisfying 0
1 and y
8 s
c
> a
.
, 8 ,y
For f
nf = rninh: f(m)
(3.5)
Q
let
F
E
are positive numbers sa-
1 for all m
>
2
.
nl
Because of multiplicativity, it is enough to verify (3.4) for n = p k , in order to establish that a given multiplicative function f
belongs to
.
$
number such that
$ , let
a=8
, and recall that
k
To see that 4 y >
u = 1
E
= 1 , let
4(p )
k
p (1
-
y
be any
Up)
.
Then
(3.4) reduces to
which is obvious since One
o,(n) =
and
y
i
dn
(1
-
l/p)Y s 1
y >
1
.
- l/p s
(1
-
l/p)-y
,
can also show that the generalized sum of divisors function
, belongs to 3
dX
any number such that
for X > 0
y >
max(1,X)
.
.
To see this let a = 8 X
If n = p k then
and (3.4) therefore reduces to (1
-
l/pX)Y s 1
.t
upX
t
...
.t
u pk X s (1
-
l/pX)-y
.
The inequality on the left is obvious, and the right-hand side follows from 1 because Y
>
1
.
t
l/pX t
. .. t u p k X
1/(1
-
UPh)
5
1/(1
- l/P3 -y
L0C;ARITHMs OF MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS
67
Now w e formulate Theorem 3.1.
1'
13.6)
n-
, then
If
f
E
l/logf(n)
=
5
.
(-1) m-1 F ( m - 1 )
1
F ( t ) = (at t 1)-l
Proof.
Let f
E
$
, and
for -l/y
nP (1 - l / p ) ( 1 .
(O)
(a log zlm
m=l
where the 0-constant depends on M
(3.7)
f o r every positive integer M
For - l / y
t
,
o(5/logMt15)
It I0
m
t
5
1 p - m ~ ( p m ) -am p )t) .
m=l
t
define
I0
(3.8)
If
E
> 0
, then
f o r some positive constants
el = el(€)
and
c2 = c ~ ( E , B ) we have
(3.9)
l/pB
t
l/(pB - 1)
I c 2 p-'+'I2
f o r p s el
,
f o r p > c1
.
and (3.10)
l/pB
t
l / b B-
1)
Now f o r every integer m
(1 - l/pB)Ylt
I
5
2
I p-BtE'2
0p(prn)p -am)Itl
so that we obtain from ( 3 . 8 ) , f o r m ht (P")
(3.4) yields
0
(f (pm, p - 9 -
2
It'
1
I
(1 - l / p B) - Y l t l
, - (f(pm-l) P - a ( m - l ) ) - It I
,
68
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIE
ax
where we have used that f(x) that
yltl s
-
-x is non-decreasing for a
a
>
1
,
, (3.9), and (3.10).
A lower bound for ht(pm) may be proven similarly; the multiplica-
tivity of ht
where a ( n ) =
now gives, for some
np.
,
c3 = c 3 ( ~ , $ )
From Theorem 1.4 it follows that for every 6
P In
and therefore for 6 = d 2 we obtain
Partial summation gives m
By using the kbius inversion formula, we obtain from (3.8)
> 0
L 0 G A R J . m OF MULTIPLICATIVE FLJN(TI0NS
69
Using (3.12) and (3.13) we have
Suppose that -l/y
5
t
5
.
~ ~ m a x ( O , B t a l y - l ) Then we obtain uniformly i n
t
0
m
Since ht
is multiplicative and
1 ht(n)/n
n=l
i s absolutely convergent, t h i s
may be written a s
I ,
where F ( t )
is given by (3.7).
W e w i l l now deduce (3.6) from (3.15).
By (3.5) we have
O(1)
and theref ore 0
0
,
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
70
To estimate the last sun observe that, for n
2
no
, f(n)>n
a/2
by (3.4), so that (3.15) yields
Using (3.15) we obtain
1' l/logf(n)
(3.16)
7
= x
nsx
F(t)xatdt
+
O(xl-BtE
.
t x
-l/Y
Since F ( t )
1
integration of
, partial
is infinitely differentiable on C-l/y,Ol F(t)zatdt
in (3.16) gives (3.6), for
E
>
0 suffi-
-l/y
ciently small. We now present another class of multiplicative functions for which
1'
ne
behaves asymptotically as c x/log x
l/log f (n)
f
.
Our approach this
time will be of a more elementary nature, and the obtained asymptotic formula (Theorem 3.2) will not provide as sharp an estimate as Theorem 3.1. Definition 3.2. A multiplicative function f belongs to the class
&I
if for every prime p
numbers a l J k
,
a2,k
9
*
and every positive integer k there exist
*.$a
kJ k
such that
(3.17)
where -1
5 aiJk 5
K uniformly in i and k with some K > 0
.
LOGARI'IHMS OF MULTIPLICATIVE FtbiCI'IONS From t h i s d e f i n i t i o n it is obvious that
f(n)
71
is s t r i c t l y p o s i t i v e
s integers ( i f t h e ai,k's and t h a t f ( n ) i s an integer i f the u ~ , ~ ' are were allowed t o take integer values l e s s than -1 then f
would not
always be p o s i t i v e ) .
$(n) and ~ ( n ,) it i s easy t o check t h a t
In addition t o
8
contains other well-known multiplicative functions such as: t h e Dedekind's function
$(n)
n
(1
t
, the
l/p)
P In function
$*(n)
n(-l)w(d)/d 1 dln, (d,n/d)=l
sum of divisors function
u*(n)
r e l a t e d t o the functions
o(n)
a r e a l s o contained i n function f
unitary analogue of Euler's t o t i e n t
3:
1 d d In, (d, n / d ) =I
unitary analogue of the
, and some other functions
.
and a*(n) While a l l of these functions
6
of Definition 3.1,
a l s o contains the
defined by k k f(p ) = p - p k - 1
f(2k)
, since
which does not belong t o f o r n = 2k
, the
and every integer k
which i s c l e a r l y impossible f o r k
t
-...- p-1 1 and (3.4) would give then
1
+
, since
the left-hand s i d e is a
p o s i t i v e constant.
On the other hand 5
means t h a t neither Theorem 3.2.
%
If
does not contain
5
nor
f
E
b
, and
Q
o,(n)
for
x
s 1
, which
.
ak,k 2 - 1 / 2
for k r k o
, then
72
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
(3.18)
1'
nQ
= 5
l/logf(n)
log x
log log log x
The proof of Theorem 3 . 2 is based on the following elementary
8,
Lemma 3.1. If f E and
C2
then there exist positive constants
and a natural number nl
(3.19)
f(n)
C1
such that
< Cln(loglogn)K
for n
t
nl
,
and (3.20)
f(n)
2
C2rn/loglogm for rn
>
1
,n
= 2k r n , rn
odd,
where K is the constant appearing in Definition 3.2. Proof of Lemma 3.1.
If r = w(n) and p
T
since f is multiplicative
= n
and
(it-) K P-1 P In
,
is the r-th prime, then
LOGARITHMS OF MULTIPLZCATIVE FUNCTIONS W e now use the elementary estimates pn s n3’2 and log P
n
2
P In
p)
(valid f o r n t 3)
(which i s v a l i d f o r n
log ~ ( n )5 21og log n
follows from n
73
t
5
,
,
and which
t o obtain, f o r n t n 1 ’
s n e ~ p ( l o g ( ( 3 E )( l~o g l o g n ) K
which proves (3.19) f o r C1 = (3B)
( 3 ~ ) ~ (log n . 1ognIK
,
.
K
To prove ( 3 . 2 0 ) we note t h a t by (3.17)
f@k)
pk
- pk-l- ...-p- 1 ,
so t h a t f(p k ) = 1 can occur only f o r p
2 ; otherwise,
f(pk)
>
1
,
and we have
Since we have
log
log 1 / ( 1 -x)
1
x
+
x2 f o r
(1 - h 1 1 = f log(1 P Im P m
5
for m > l
5
and C4
1 - 1-P-1
log(C3 log logm)
s u f f i c i e n t l y large, so t h a t
0 s x -1
5
,Im[
+ o(1)
1/2
, we
1
p-l
obtain 1
+
02)
s log(c, log logm)
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. I V I d
74 -1
where C2 = C4
which, when combined with (3.21)
)
proves (3.20).
1 l / p and p n would lead t o explicit psx C1 and C2 but C1 and C2 would still depend on K . Taking
Sharper estimates of values of =
Pi P2
nl '*
)
)
primes we find t h a t t h e
t o be the product of the f i r s t k
'Pk
bounds of (3.19) and (3.20) a r e actually attained, Proof of Theorem 3.2. there a r e O(1ogx)
1
the fact t h a t
numbers not exceeding x l / l o g n xflogx
292.2
1'
(3.22)
U l o g f(n)
2
%X
2
1 can occur only f o r n = 2k
Since f ( n )
lfl / l o g n t O
1'
nCx
t
O(x/log2 x)
, and
log2 x
)-
.
Using
(3.19) we obtain
1;x
log2 x
which gives the necessary lower-bound inequality. bound note t h a t i f
1
I/(log n t log c1 t log log log n)
xlogloglogs
n<x
f o r which f ( n )
k
k > k o and f(2 ) z 1
)
To obtain the upper
then f(Zk)
3/2 by
2
(3.17) and
.
5-1/2 If m 2 3 i s odd, then from k, k l/logm - l / ( l o g C2 t log m - log logm) = O(log log logrn/log2 m)
a
1'
n2
l / l o g f ( n ) O
and R e s > l ,
m
where H(s) = gives
1 h ( n ) n-' n=l
is absolutely convergent for Re s
>
1/2 . This
QUOTIWS OF ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
109
which is obtained from Lemma 1.1, by observing the condition can be replaced by
) zI
5
A
IzI s 1
.
Note i n this connection t h a t t h e analogous estimate
c- 1 nsx holds f o r
0 2
.
The reason f o r this is t h a t the
corresponding Euler product f o r C > 2
does not converge absolutely f o r
1t
Re s > 1 only, since
t
c22-2s t
. ..
converges absolutely f o r R e s > l o g C / l o g 2 > 1 . In case C = 2 t h a t f o r some s u i t a b l e constants
1 2n(n)
nSx
one can show
D and E we have
DEC h g 2 x
t
Ex l o g x
t
O(x)
.
A proof of t h i s formula may be found i n the paper of E. Grosswald c21.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
CHAPTER 5 A SHARPENING OF ASYMPTOTIC FORMULAE
11. Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to sharpen some of the asymptotic formulae proven in the previous chapters. In particular, we improve the formulae
and
by introducing new leading terms. Our results will hold for certain classes of non-negative, integer-valued additive functions f for which we shall give sharp estimates of the sum
1'
nsz
.
l/f(n)
These estimates will be seen
to depend on two deep lemnas which give estimates for the sum
1zf(n) nsx
,
and which possess an intrinsic number-theoretic significance of their own. Both lemmas (due to H. Delanee) were originally derived with the purpose of estimating sums of the form
1
1
n % , f ( n ) =k
, where
k (21)
is a fixed
integer, and f belongs to a certain class of additive, non-negative and integer-valued functions. As corollaries to lemmas 5.1 and 5 . 2 we shall deduce sharpest known asymptotic formulae for the sums 111
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. IVI6
112
1
1
nsx, w ( a )=k
and
c
1 .
a%, n ( n )-w ( n )=k
Because of the unifying principles underlying these lemas, namely, the convolution method and complex integration (carried out in detail in the proof of Lemma l.l), and because of our desire to keep the exposition as clear as possible, we consider it more appropriate to devote a chapter to the sharpening of the asymptotic formulae, rather than to have stated the best results in the earlier chapters. Before proceeding further we shall introduce the concept of a slowly oscillating function. A real-valued function f(x)
is called
slowly oscillating (or slowly varying) if it is positive and continuous and for every c > 0 ,
for x 1. xo
(5.1) Many functions that appear in error terms in asymptotic formulae for arithmetical functions such as logA J: , exp(C 10gl’~x)
, log log x etc.
are easily seen to be slowly oscillating. These functions possess a canonical representation of the form
where
and 6 ( x ) are continuous for x z x o
p(x)
lim 6 ( x )
= 0
every
>
so
x+-
.E
0
.
lim
p(r)
x+-
that the above representation yields L ( x )
A > 0
1/2
f o r which
(5.2)
if t h i s set is non-empty (and u0 (p) =
of a l l
p 2
0
the set E
f o r which
(finite or
e x i s t functions A, ( z ) Ao(0)
(5.3)
A1(0)
n-
...
t-).
1
1 be t h e supremum of
Then f o r every fixed integer N (z
I
t
0 there
< 1 such t h a t
, and
= AN(0) = 0
N
(-1 A3. ( z ) l o g - j z
t
J =O
where the 0-constant is uniform f o r zf ( n )
, and
m
, A1 ( z ) ,. .. ,A N ( z ) analytic on
z f ( n ) = z(logz)z-l
Proof.
t
Iz
I
< 1
O(l0g
-N-1
x))
,
.
is multiplicative since f ( n ) is additive,
therefore follows that f o r Re s
>
1
and f o r
12
I
p L E
(since
It
uo ( p ) < 1)
114
J . M . DE KONINCK
AND A. IVIC
where
W e now show t h a t the i n f i n i t e product i n (5.5) i s an analytic funct i o n of
and z
s
for
IzI 5 p
E
E
and Res > u l > o
(p)
.
To investigate
the convergence properties of i n f i n i t e products we note the following s i m ple result:
Suppose u,(x)
and v n ( x ) a r e two sequences of complex func-
tions defined on the same s e t A
, and suppose that f o r every
n
2
1 and
for x e B _ c A
where
un
and
(5.7)
vn
a r e positive constants such t h a t m
m
n=l
n=l
Then the i n f i n i t e product
is absolutely and uniformly convergent f o r for x
E
B
.
To see t h i s , we define w n ( x )
by
3: E
B
and i t s value is bounded
A
If
V > 0
115
SHARPENING OF ASYMPTOTIC FORMJLAE
is such a number that
then there e x i s t s a M
>
0
and
Vn 5 U
such t h a t f o r
Iz
I
2
Vn
5
U
for n
2
1
u
Since
we see t h a t f o r n
where
W,
V
= Me V;
2
1 and f o r x
+
MVn
, so
E
B
that (5.7) implies absolute and uniform con-
vergence of the product (5.8) f o r x
E
B
.
This product is bounded by
m
Numerating t h e sequence of primes
p1,p2,. . . , p , , .
..
we note that
the above r e s u l t holds f o r
provided t h a t (5.6) and (5.7) hold with n replaced by p Recalling t h e d e f i n i t i o n of
where
G
, we
have
.
,
116
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
(5.10)
If
IzI 5 p
E
and Res 2 o1 > u
E
then, since zf@) = z
(p)
,
we have
and
since ul
>
1/2 and
1 ( 1 pf @ k ) p - k u l ) z
p
converges by ( 5 . 2 ) for u1 > 1/2.
k=2
Moreover
which means that
1 VP
P
u 1
0
(p)
.
Therefore the product in (5.9) is absolutely and uniformly convergent in the region defined by
Iz
I
5 p E
E
and Re s > u1
the factors in (5.9) is an analytic function of
f is integer-valued and non-negative, tion of s
G(s,z)
s
.
Since each of
in this region, because
represents an analytic func-
in the same region. In particular, since R > 1 by hypothesis,
we find that for IzI s 1
where each g ( n , z )
is analytic on
IzI 5
1
.
117
A SHARPENING OF ASYMPTOTIC FOFMJIAE
From (5.4) we obtain
where
is t h e generalized d i v i s o r function defined by (1.10). Lemma
dz(m)
1.1 y i e l d s uniformly f o r
1zf(n)
(5.13)
n-
For From (5.5)
G(s,z) =
Iz
, we
I
5
= z
n
JzI
5
1g(n,z)
1
N
1 c i ( z ) logz-ix/n
n-'I
1 and f o r every n a t u r a l number
I
we have
k
(z) I
s1
.
have
n(1-zp-'t (i)pm2'
whence g ( p , z ) = 0 and
t
Ig(pk,z)I
implies that uniformly f o r
1 g(n,z)n-llogAn
nsx
Re z-N-1 O(1og
i=1
P
(5.14)
t
IzI
5
. . .) (1t zfS
k d(p ) = k
t
t
.fb2)p-2s
1 for
s 1 and every A
k
0 and
2
.
2
2 E
>
m
=
1g(n,z)n-llogAn n=l
t O(z
since
From (5.14) we obtain uniformly f o r
IzI s
1
logA z)
t
. . .)
This
0
,
,
118
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
as follows: Writing
1
1/3 for which
(5.18)
if this set is non-empty (and u be the set of
p2
0 for which
1
otherwise).
+m
, and let
< 1/2
+m)
that F ( 0 ) = 6/n2 , A o ( 0 )
(5.19)
u,(p)
=
Furthermore let I R>1
. Then for every.fixed integer A . (2) ,... , A N ( z ) which are analytic on
mum of I (finite or functions F ( z )
(p)
=
...
AN(0) = 0
z F ( z ) +z1’2 logz-2z(
ncz
be the supre-
N > 0 there exist
I
(2
, and
N
1 A j ( z ) log-jr t O(log-N-lz))
j=O
where the 0-constant is uniform for
1.~1 s
Proof. We begin by noting that
1
.
u,(p)
R
and the A . ( z ) ’ s that 3
appear in both lemmas are not necessarily the same functions. For Res > 1
s 1 such
and
IzI
5 p E
I (since
o,(p)
1
.
In p a r t i c u l a r g,@) = 0 and
W e thus have
(s
- 1)
, we
~ ( s )
define H(s,z)
by
in order t o obtain (5.26)
G(s,z)
= H(s,z) ( s - 1/2)l-'
W e now give a brief sketch of the proof.
. I t consists of
121
J.M. LIE KONINCK AND A. IVIi
122
(a) proving that the function V ( s , z ) .s
and z
for
Iz
I
for < 1
12
I
5 p
, since
E
R>
I
and for Res > u l
is an analytic function of (and, in particular,
> u,(p)
1 by hypothesis),
(b) using the inversion formula ctiT
X
with c > 1/2
, and
(5.28)
to obtain
for some suitable functions $ z and Qz
, where Gz(x)
is not G(s,z)
of (5.26),
1zf(n)
(c) recovering
nlz:
and
from Gz(x)
(d) showing that the functions F,A,,
by a convolution argument,
., .,A N
satisfy the conditions
specified in the lemma. We begin with (a).
From the definition of h
P
and from (5.23),
we have that
for
s
P
.
m
Thus
1 g,(P
k=2
) p -ks
converges absolutely and uniformly
A
for I z I s
p E
SHARPENING OF ASYMPTOTIC F O W
I and for Res 2 ul > u,(p)
123
, since, by hypothesis,
m
converges. Therefore all factors of the infinite product
k=3
(5.31)
P
k=2
are well-defined for these values of s and
, and the general term may
z
be written as
where
Furthermore,
Since the sum in (5.18) is bounded we have
Thus
1 U2P
1 by hypothesis.
In applying the inversion formula (5.27) it should be noted that which appears i n (5.25) is analytic i n any open neighborhood of
Z(s)
, that
1 which is f r e e of zeros of
s
~ ( s )
Z(1)
= 0
and t h a t
.
exp(Z(s)) = (s - 1) ~ ( s ) To obtain (b) we replace the contour of integration
Cc
- iT , c + i T 1 by the contour used i n the proof of Lemma 1 . 2 ,
with the point
1 replaced by
s
s =1/2
.
(This is done because t h e
generating function now has a singularity a t s = 1 / 2 i n Lemma 1.1.)
From (5.25), from t h e product representation given i n (5.24)
, and
for
V(s,z)
for
IzI 5 1
,
and not a t s = 1 as
It1
from (1.14), it is e a s i l y seen t h a t
2
tl and u
2
1/2 - a / l o g ( I t l ) , a > O
.
The evaluation of the integral appearing on the right-hand side of (5.27) i s analogous t o the evaluation performed i n the proof of Lemma 1.1, and therefore we omit the d e t a i l s . Gz (t)d t
, the
To recover Gz(z)
same simple Tauberian arguments used i n Lemma 1.1 are again
used t o yield (5.29), where, f o r some c > 0 IzI s 1
(5.33)
from
, we
have uniformly f o r
A SHARPENING OF ASYMPTOTIC FORMULAE
125
and
(5.34)
t
For
Iz
I
s
1
1 2ni
)
stl
~(s,z)(s-1/2)~-~. .-. 5
ds
.
, @z(x) is an infinitely differentiable function of
x whose derivatives are obtained by differentiating under the integral
sign, and
is the circle
y,
q
Is
- 1/21
= P
minus the point s = 1/2 - r
,
is as defined i n Lemma 1.1.
We now prove (c) by using (5.22) and the convolution method. If y
y(x)
is a function satisfying 1
where F ( z )
1 / 3 +
i n which z 121 6
1
E
respectively.
I
1
, Re s 2
1/2
and
t E
We a r e thus faced with a convolution problem
i s not an integer, but an a r b i t r a r y complex number s a t i s f y i n g
, thereby
and s = 1 / 2
/z
and v ( s, z)
U(s,z)
producing an algebraic singularity a t the points
respectively.
s
1
This i s why a complicated contour of integra-
t i o n (introduced i n Lemma 1.1) w a s used. The above mentioned papers of H. Delange contain many results, re-
ferences and generalizations concerned with sums of the form where k
is fixed, and f is an additive function.
ginal paper concerning the problem of estimating R6nyi [I]; f o r the special case where k
1
,
For A. R6nyi's o r i -
c
~SZ,R (n)--w
, see
1 1 n 1
when one applies Lema 5.1 o r 5.2, and, though t h i s condition could doubtl e s s l y be somewhat relaxed, it is an easy one t o verify and furthermore it covers t h e i n t e r e s t i n g cases of "small" additive functions such as w ( n ) and n(n)
.
"Square-full" numbers are a special case of the more general 'powerful" numbers.
For a fixed k
E
N
one may define the set of powerful
numbers G(k) as G(k)
k { n c N I (pln) => (p I n ) )
Square-full numbers a r e then j u s t
G(2)
.
.
I f we s e t
and
then A k ( x )
i s the number of powerful numbers n
i n G(k) t h a t do not
146
J.M.
exceed x
. m
Fk(s)
where G
Since for Re s > l / k
1 f,(n) n-' n=l k
(6)
DE KONINCK
1 (1 + p - k s
AND
A. IVId
we have
tp-(ktl)s
P
t
... )
= c ( k s ) G,(s)
has the abscissa of convergence equal t o l / ( k t l )
, the
con-
volution method inunediately yields
and
Powerful numbers were first investigated by P. E r d k and G. Szekeres CIJs where the above formula w a s proven.
Much sharper asymptotic for-
mulae f o r A (x) can be obtained by more i n t r i c a t e methods; f o r these k methods see P.T. Bateman and E. Grosswald C11, and Ivi; C3l.
CHAPTER 6 RECIPROCALS OF "LARGE" ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
11. Introduction In Chapter 2 we studied asymptotic formulae for the sum
1'
n-
where f ( n ) was a "small" additive function belonging to the class
l/f(n), Su
of
Definition 2.2. Broadly speaking, one could say that a general "small" non-negative arithmetical function f ( n ) is a function for which
as
z
-+
, where
L(z)
is a slowly oscillating function. This implies
that one can think of L ( z ) as the "average order" of f ( n ) in a certain sense. For every
E
>
0 we have
which means that the average order of f
is small. On the other hand,
there exist non-negative additive functions f for which (6.1) does not hold, and furthermore for every D
>
0 one can easily find a non-negative
additive function f satisfying
(6.3)
147
1 48
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. I V l 6
which means t h a t f must be i n some way very large. t o be the average order of
More precisely, one can define g ( n ) f(n)
if
(6.4)
as z
-f
m
, where
t i a l etc.).
is a "well-behaved" function (polynomial, exponen-
Thus we can say that f ( n ) i s "large" i f there is an
such t h a t f o r n
where g ( n )
g(n)
2
E
> 0
no(€)
s a t i s f i e s (6.4).
For our purposes we w i l l formalize the concept of "large" additive functions by considering a class h'
, which
contains the most interesting
"large" additive functions t h a t we have i n mind. Definition 6.1. let (6.5)
(6.7)
and
For K
fixed,
y >
0 and
6
a fixed r e a l number,
149
LARGE ADDITIVE FUN(TI0N.S
The class H of large additive functions is defined to be the class of all possible functions f , F and F1 obtainable by varying K, y
>
0 and 6
.
Our definition of class H
includes for K
= y =
1,6
0 the
functions
(6.10)
and
(6.11)
The functions f3
, B and
B1
are of great intrinsic interest.
For example, for a fixed integer rn the number of solutions of B ( n )
=
m
is the number of partitions of rn into primes (not necessarily distinct), the number of solutions of f3(n) = rn , p 2 ( n )
=
1 is the number of parti-
tions of rn into distinct primes, while the number of solutions of Bl(n)
rn
is the number of partitions of m into powers of distinct pri-
mes. The function ~ ( n )is the additive analogue of the multiplicative function a ( n )
fl
p
, whose sum of reciprocals was investigated in
P In
Chapter 1. The average order of
~ ( n )and B(n)
(in the sense of (6.4))
is a2n/(610gn) ; this can be seen from the asymptotic formulae
150
J.M. DE KONINCK
AND A. IVId
(6.12)
and (6.13)
Our goal i s t o obtain estimates f o r
where f
,F
i f and only i f
and F1 belong t o H n
1
, and
(note t h a t
the same f o r F
f(n) 2 0
and f ( n ) = 0
and F1 ) . The techniques
based on the properties of the generating series
or
which successfully worked i n previous chapters, seem t o be of no use here. The d i f f i c u l t y l i e s i n the f a c t that there is no obvious way ( i f any a t a l l ) t o factor out a power of the zeta function from the generating s e r i e s .
W e therefore abandon t h e approach v i a Dirichlet s e r i e s and proceed instead with investigations of a more elementary nature.
W e shall not be able t o
obtain asymptotic formulae f o r sums of reciprocals of functions belonging
t o H , but only good lower and upper bounds f o r these sums. Estimates furnished by Theorem 6.1 extend, of course, t o
B
,B
and B1
, and
53 we give estimates f o r sums of quotients of these functions, and an
in
LARGE ADDITIVE FUNCITONS
151
asymptotic formula for
as well.
Bounds for sums of reciprocals
12.
Theorem 6.1. Let f , F and F 1 be functions belonging to class H
of Definition 6.1. Then there exist two positive constants 0
< el < c2
such that if
(6.14)
(6.15) then (6.16)
(6.17) and (6.18) where c1 , c2 and the 0
, we
u(n) O
then for x sufficiently large, and the lower bounds of Theorem 6.1 follow then from (6.28) and (6.29). To establish the upper bounds it is enough to establish the upper
bound in (6.16), since the other two proofs are identical. We now have for y y(x)
>
that
x
because
in the second sum, since, as previously noted, h ( x ) is increasing for x>x
.
For the function
$(X,Y)
1
1
n=, P (n)sy
we use the following estimate due to N.G. de Bruijn Cnl:
(6.31)
$(x,y)
L
This + l i e s
...+ ( a i - 1 ) p i t B ( n )
5
i s summed,
that
L(alt
...t ai - i ) t @ ( n )
Therefore we have
where we have used (6.38). From (6.47), (6.48), (6.49), (6.50), (6.51), and (6.52) we theref o r e have (6.53)
s
s
O(ktc/L)
3: t
+
O(x exp(-C3k))
.
.
O ( ~ log L 3: exp (-c4 (log x log l o g s ) '/*)I
Noting t h a t t r i v i a l l y
(6.54)
t
S 2
x
t
O(1)
, and
. log l o g r ) 1 / 2
k
(logx
L
exp(C,-(logx
choosing
Y
and (6.55)
. log log x)'I2
,
.
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
160
where
C5 = C,/2
, we
obtain (6.43) from (6.53).
Theorem 6.2 can be e a s i l y generalized a s follows: Theorem 6.3.
If
t i v e constants C1 , C2
r > 0
is a fixed number, then t h e r e e x i s t posi-
such t h a t
(6.56) and (6.57)
Proof.
The proof of (6.56) is almost i d e n t i c a l t o t h e correspond-
ing proof of (6.43)
except t h a t i n S1 t h e sum i s over those
which B(n) < k l I P p(n)
and i n S2 t h e sum is over those
n
for
n f o r which
B(n) 2 klIr B(n) . This leads t o an estimate similar t o t h a t i n (6.53),
where
k
i s replaced by k1Ir
. The choice
k = (logx
. log l o g z ) r/2
completes the proof of (6.56). To prove (6.57) we again have t r i v i a l l y
(6.58)
Using t h e Cauchy-Schwarz inequality i n the form
161
LARGE ADDITIVE FUN(TTI0N.S where
we obtain
so t h a t (6.57) follows from (6.56), (6.58) and (6.60).
I t seems i n t e r e s t i n g t o a l s o i n v e s t i g a t e
(6.61) and (6.62)
and t o compare these suns with (6.43).
-
on t h e average considerably l a r g e r than greater than cz as
3:
+.
One feels t h a t B l ( n ) B(n)
, so
should be
t h a t (6.61) should be
f o r any constant c > 0
.
This follows e a s i l y
from Theorem 6.4.
As x
,
+.-
(6.63)
Proof.
x
.
Let
Let p1 < p 2
0 define
Then f
is additive and we have
since there is at least one prime p
between x/2
and x for x 2 3
.
The average order of an arithmetical function (as given by (6.4)) in m s t cases differs from the maximal order F(n)
, which may be defined
as the function F(n) satisfying
For example, from ( 2 . 2 ) and ( 2 . 3 ) , it is seen that loglogn is the average order of both w(n) and o(n)
(6.84)
which was used in (6.51).
n(n)
5
, while
logn/log 2
,
Furthermore for some C
>
0
,n
t
3
,
LARGE ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
(6.85)
w(n)
Clogn/loglogn
s
and C l o g n / l o g l o g n
for n=nk
,
,
n(n) and w(n) a r e t h e functions
which implies t h a t t h e maximal order of logn/log2
169
respectively ( a t t a i n e d f o r n = Zk
th e product of t h e first k
md
(6.84) follows tri-
primes).
v i a l l y from a
n = p1
.
-I-. .+a
1
k
2"n)
while (6.85) follows from
u2(d) s d ( n ) s e x p ( C l o g n / l o g l o g n )
(6.86)
d ( n ) i s exp(Clogn/loglogn)
which a l s o shows t h a t t h e maximal order of
bince the maximal order i s a t t a i n e d again f o r n = n k first that if
primes).
k
n
p:'.
..p:
for all p
is fixed.
and a
t h e product of t h e
is t h e canonical decomposition of
n 6>0
,
To see t h a t t h e l a s t inequality i n (6.86) holds note
d o =k l az. t l where
,
6
We now have
, and
thus
do 6 n
i=l
a.6
pi
z
n
, then
'
( a t 1)/pa6 s 1 f o r p z 2"'
and
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIe
170
The desired inequality in the form
(6.87)
then follows for 6 = ((1
t
~ / 2 )log 2) /log log n
.
A more detailed account of
this subject may be found in Knopfmacher C11, Chapter 5. The inequality (6.23) is obvious from Stirling's formula for the gannna function if k is large, but it is also easily obtained by mathematical induction. For k = 6 we have 36 = 729
>
720
6!
, and the induc-
tion hypothesis yields
2;
(k+l)!(l+l/k)k
>
,
(k+l)!
since
In Definition 6.1, h ( x ) is a slowly oscillating function for 0< y < 1
.
It would be of interest to investigate
l'l/f(n) n%
(as well as F and F1 as given by (6.7) and (6.8))
, where
where
h(x)
is a
general non-decreasing slowly oscillating function, or even if h ( s ) = x%(x) where u > 0 and L ( x ) is slowly oscillating.
,
LAFGE ADDITIVE FUNCTIONS
171
The formulae (6.12) and (6.13) a r e not d i f f i c u l t t o prove.
From
the prime number theorem we obtain by p a r t i a l summation
(6.88)
P“Y c p
-
y2+ 0 2logy
1
- 5
Ilog2,
’
which gives
(6.89)
since
1 Urn2
rnsx
=
~ ( 2 )t 0(1/x) = n 2 / 6
t
0(1/x)
.
The proof of (6.13) is similar, and one can also prove
(6.90)
One of the few papers i n which B
and B
a r e investigated i s t h a t
of K. Alladi and P. Erdos C11, which contains many interesting r e s u l t s including proofs of (6.12) and (6.13).
For instance they prove t h a t f o r a
J.M. JE KONINCK AND A. IVId
172
fixed integer rnrl
,
as x-tm
, which
of n
Here Pi(n) (i = 1,.
n
.
, and
ple of
k,>O
reveals the connection between B
. . ,rn)
denotes the i-th largest prime factor of
is a constant depending on rn
c ( 1 t Urn)
.
, which is a rational m u l t i -
They also prove
1 (B(n) -
(6.92)
and large prime factars
nsx
B(n)) = x l o g l o g x t + ( x )
,
by noting t h a t
=
1 pcx/p21 P2”
t
c
pCx/p31 p3sx
t
...=x l o g l o g x t o ( z )
,
since
and
Further r e s u l t s concerning
B(n) and B(n) may be found i n the
paper of K. Alladi C11. There is an extensive l i t e r a t u r e about
LARGE ADDITIVE
One of t h e well-known estimates of
173
FUNCTIONS
Y(x,y) (somewhat weaker than (6.31))
can be found i n Prachar C11, Chapter 5. An estimate sharper than (6.31) can be found i n de Bruijn C3l. In (6.28) we used the estimate
since
because xo i s fixed. Note from (6.12) t h a t
B(n) = o ( n ) f o r almost a l l n
a
so t h a t
following the proof of Theorem 6.4 we may replace (6.63) with the sharper result
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
CHAPTER 7 RECIPROCALS IN SHORT INTERVALS
91. Introduction This chapter is concerned with the study of the sums
(7.1) where f belongs to a certain class of non-negative, integer-valued arithmetical functions. In '(7.1),
n belongs to the "short" interval ( x , t~ h l
where (as is customary in such problems) "short" means that h = O ( X ) z+-
.
,
, as
A n extensive literature concerning
(7.2) for various arithmetical functions f (or classes of functions) already exists. In addition to possessing an intrinsic interest, asymptotic formulae for (7.1) and ( 7 . 2 ) often lead to inequalities of the type
(7.3) where an is an increasing sequence of positive integers with interesting number-theoretic properties (such as a sequence of primes, a sequence of integers representable as a sum of two squares, etc.). approach to the estimate 175
Thus the classical
176
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVIC
(7.4) where p ,
is the n-th prime, is based on establishing the asymptotic for-
mula
+ ( r th) - +(r)=
(7.5)
1
A(,)
x<nsxth
= (1 t o ( 1 ) ) h
,
as h-+m and c
(7.6)
h z x ,
whence (7.4) follows by taking x = pn
.
Our approach to the estimation of the sum ( 7 . 1 ) is based on the general method developed in Chapter 2 . We first estimate
(7.7)
.
We
where the error term we shall obtain will be uniform for IzI
5
shall then integrate this estimate over
, where
E(Z)
z
from
~ ( r to )
1
1
will be a suitably chosen function satisfying
lim
m
E(Z)
= 0
.
This procedure is particularly well-adapted to functions f for which z f ( n )
is generated by Dirichlet series of the form
RECIPROCALS IN SHORT INTERVALS where IzI 5
177
, considered as a function of s , is absolutely convergent on 1 , and Res = u 2 uo , for some uo < 1 . By an heuristic approach G
one may give an estimate for (7.1) for those functions f for which an asymptotic estimate of one would expect, for h
l’l/f(n)
n a
is known.
~ ( x )as
I+-
From Theorem 2.5, for example,
,
(7.9) but we are unable t o give a lower bound for h = h ( x ) such that (7.9) holds
82.
A n asymptotic formula for z f ( n )
in short intervals
We now prove Theorem 7.1, which will enable us to derive an asymptotic formula for the sum (7.1) whenever f belongs to a certain class of multiplicative or additive functions satisfying (7.8). Theorem 7.1
Let f ( n ) be a non-negative integer-valued arithme-
tical function such that (a) f ( n ) is multiplicative and f ( p )
(b) f ( n )
is additive and f(p)
If h = o ( z ) as
I+-
0
1 for all primes p for all primes p
, then uniformly on
IzI 5
,or
.
1
(7.11)
and a
(S
346/1067) is a constant for which the asymptotic formula
178
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. I V I d
holds. Proof. We first assume that (a) holds. Let g,(n) by (7.11).
Then, for
If n
= pm
IzI 2
1 and for all n
, where (p,m)
f and the fact that f ( p )
1
be defined
,
, then by the multiplicativity of
1 we obtain
This implies
where c(n) is a multiplicative function such that 0
(7.16)
c(n)
if there is a p
such that p I In
,
= 2w (n)
otherwise.
If (b) holds, then (7.15) and (7.16) are still true, since g,(n)
179
RECIPROCALS IN SHORT INTERVALS
is multiplicative whenever f is additive. Moreover
p(1) zf(P)
gz(p)
For Res
>
1/2
t p(p)
= z o - zo
0
.
,
P
n=l
where (7.18)
is a Dirichlet series which is absolutely convergent for Re s > 1/3 the rough estimate
1 d(n)
n a
0
.
SY
We split the range n
i
SY
such that
Then
. x1/2 in (7.75) into O(1ogx)
intervals
of the form (IV,ZiVI and then use the above lemna with F ( t ) = zt-' X = IV
,Y
2117
, and
E
Z X I V - ~ to obtain (7.71).
,
A entirely elementary
proof of the same result (with log2x instead of logx)
can be found
in Vinogradov C11. One could also obtain (7.27) from a general convolution theorem of Tull 111, but our derivation, though longer, is self-complete.
and may be established by integration by parts (for more details concerning (7.34) see Chapter 8). To obtain the leading term in (7.48) one may use the Perron inver-
sion formula
where the prime
'
indicates that u ( n ) is replaced by u ( n ) / 2 whenever
x is an integer. When one moves the line of integration, the leading term in (7.48) is then simply the sum of residues at and
s
s=
1
, s = 1/2 ,
1/3 respectively. The best approach to the estimation of the
RECIPROCALS IN SHORT INTERVALS
199
error term in (7.48) consists again in transforming it into sums involving the function $(t) = t
-
Ctl - 1/2
is due to Srinivasan C11.
formula for
1a(n)
n-
.
The best result
This is also the error term in the asymptotic
(see Notes, Chapter 1).
The more general divisor
problems, such as the estimation of
1 1 ,
a b mn%
(1 5 a < b
, a , b integers) can also make use of estimates involving
(see Richert C 1 I) .
$(t)
For qntl - qn , the difference between consecutive square-free numbers, see Richert
C21,
where he proves
Further slight improvements were obtained by Rankin [ T I and Schmidt C11. Their basic idea is to investigate the range of h for which
1 p2(n) x
0 that for every
(8.21)
where a(n)
.
be the set of all positive mltiplicati-
ve functions f such that for some a 5
when ( k , Z ) = 1 or k
& .
Definition 8.2. Let
formly for -l/a
Then for certain functions
, and
ht(n)
0
is the constant appearing i n Definition 3.2.
thus obtain for some suitable C > 0
since , t r i v i a l l y
We
21 5
R E S T R I f l I O N TO PARTICULAR SEQUENCES OF INTEGERS
Before proceeding t o estimate (8.17) f o r c e r t a i n functions f E %,! we give a general i d e n t i t y f o r the generating function of any multiplica-
t i v e function f r e s t r i c t e d t o a congruence class f o r which t h e abscissa m
of convergence
u
1 f ( n ) n-' n=l
of
0
is f i n i t e .
Let f be a multiplicative function such that
Lemna 8.2. m
1 f(n)
converges absolutely f o r Res > u
n-'
then
n=l
m
n=l
, k'
where d = (k,Z) modk'
k/d
, I'
, and
= Z/d
the x's a r e t h e characters
. Proof.
If
(k,Z) = k (k, I )
becomes (8.3), while if
, then
n i l @ ) means n-O(k)
1 we have
d=1
, and
, and
(8.22)
(8.22) follows
from (8.14). Lemna 8.3. Res>l
and - l / a
Let f E 5
t
5
0
and l e t
( k , 2) = 1 o r k
.
Then f o r
,
216
J.M. DE KONINCK
AND A. IVId
where (8.24)
F(s,k,t)
p
=
t...)
-2a
2
t Y L - d mx t 1 ( P k'
cf(p)p
t
t . . .)
-1
P 2s
PS
-(atl)a t
at1 t
where d = ( k , l ) mod k
-1
k ' = k/d
, Z'
= Z/d
(f@
P(
and the
t...)
a) tP1 ) s
,
x's are t h e characters
. Since f i s positive and -l/a
Proof. 0 s ( f ( n )n-a)t
I,
1
.
t
5
0
we have t h a t
Thus the proof follows immediately from Lemna 8.2
with f ( n ) replaced by
(.f(n) n-")
I,
Cf(n)n-a)t
,
since the non-negativity of
implies the non-vanishing of t h e s e r i e s
217
RESTRICTION TO PARTICULAR SEQUENCES OF INTEGERS f o r Re s
2
1 , and assures absolute and uniform convergence f o r
of t h e Dirichlet s e r i e s generated by
Re s > 1
( f ( n ) n-")*, - l / a I t 2 0
.
We a r e now ready t o employ our basic method which was outlined i n Chapter 2 and was used i n Chapter 3 f o r summing reciprocals of logarithms of multiplicative functions.
1
mula f o r
We shall f i r s t e s t a b l i s h an asymptotic for-
, where f
belongs t o a subclass of
Let
&
ft(n)
&x, n Z ( k )
&,
, defi-
ned by Definition 8.3.
(8.25)
df(p)p-a)t
E
, where
[-A,O]
We c l e a r l y have
, then
and some 6
>
0
1 t O(p-&)
i n a r b i t r a r y but fixed, and
A >0
except possibly f o r O(xE)
fE
be t h e class of functions be-
such t h a t f o r every prime p
longing t o
for t
f
integers
nsr
5
4.
u
5
f o r which f ( n ) = 1 , In order t o see t h i s , l e t
from (3.4) we have
1- p - 8 s (f(p) p - a p s (1 - p - B ) - 1 = 1 O ( f 8 )
,
which implies (f(pj p T t =
{
(fb)P -"1l l q t / y
=
(l+O@-B))t/y = l t O ( p - 8 )
since t belongs t o a fixed i n t e r v a l .
From ( 3 . 4 ) we have f ( n )
, >>
n
a/2
.
21 8
J . M . DE KONINCK AND A. IVIi
Thus, f e
h1.
Similarly, using (3.20),
L e m 8.4. k
Let f~
.&,
and - l / a
&
5
A1 ,
5
t
5
0
.
If (k,Z) = 1 o r
, then
(8.27)
1
ft(n) = G(l,k,t) zattl attl nsx n-Z(k)
atG(l,k,t) + R ( 0 ) attl
where G is defined by
where d
(8.29)
(k,Z)
,k
k'ld
, and o(z l t a t - p 1
R(a,t)
uniformly in t for some fixed
p >
0
.
Proof. From the definition of ht(n) we have
(8.30)
which in view of (8.23) implies
Y
219
RESTRICTION M PARTICULAR SEQUENCES OF 1NTEC;ERS
m
(8.32)
B(s,k,t)
and f o r every
E >
1 b(n,k,t) n-' n=l
,
0
1 b(n,k,t)
(8.33)
=
n-
,
O(Z~-~'€) t ) '~'Z(O
since uniformly i n t
To see that (8.34) holds, we note t h a t using (8.25) we have f o r Res>l
n(1+X ( p ) f S
+0(f6) p - s + X*(p) ( p - 2 Q f ( p 2 ) ) t p - 2 s +.
P
=
n
P
(1 - x@) p - s ) -l
L(s,x)
t O(p-6)
P
n (l+O(p-6)p-St...)
P where
r[ ( 1 - x@) p-) ( 1 t x(p> p - s
.. 1
L(s,x)
C(s,x>
>
p - s t . . .)
J . M . DE KONINCK
2 20
AND
A. IVId
and
is regular f o r Re s > max (1- 6,1/2) for X = X
1
and k
, which
implies then (8.34), since
fixed,
A l l the products i n (8.24) of the type
are non-vanishing f o r Re s = 1 a regular function of
s
.
This means t h a t i n (8.24)
f o r Res > 1- p f o r some fixed
F(s,k,t) p >
0 , Using
a convolution argument we then i n f e r from (8.31) and (8.33) that
The above equation gives
(8.36)
is
RESTRICTION TO PARTICULAR SEQUENCES OF INTEGERS
I t i s now c l e a r why a condition such as (8.21) was needed. recalling t h a t from Theorem 1.4 we have f o r every
E >
221
Indeed
0
we obtain from (8.21)
f o r some
E~
> 0
.
Using p a r t i a l sumnation t o estimate
we obtain from (8.36)
which i n view of remarks made e a r l i e r gives
(8.40)
1
n ~ xn-2 , (k)
( f ( n ) n-’)*
= xG(lyk,t)
t
0(x1-’)
.
P a r t i a l sumnation f i n a l l y gives (8.29) f o r some fixed p > 0 which is not necessarily the s a m a t each stage of the proof.
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVId
222
We are now ready to establish an asymptotic formula f o r the general
sum (8.17). Theorem 8.3.
Let f e
A1 , and l e t
1 or k
(k.,Z)
.
For an
arbitrary but fixed integer M z l we have
n-Z (k) where al = l / k
, and more
generally
a
(-1)
j
where E ( t ) = G(l,k,t)/(at
t
1)
j-1
E
(j-1)
(0)
, G(l,k,t)
,
being defined by the function
appearingin the statement of Lemma 8.4. Proof.
We make use of (8.26), which bounds f ( n ) away from unity,
except f o r O(xE) integers n s x nsx
satisfying f ( n ) 2 2
. Since
.
Let
c'
denote summation over those
f ( n ) >> naI2
2
for n z n
0
, we
for c > a
Since f ( n )
>>
na/'
for a l l n
, and
f(n) 2 2
for n z n o
,
have
RESTRICTION TO PARTICULAR SEQUENCES OF INTEGERS
1 f ( n ) dt= n~~:,nZ(k)
(8.44) -l/c
1
( E ( t ) xa t t l t a t E ( t ) +O(xl t a t - p
223
1) d t ,
-l/c
where E ( t ) = G(l,k,t)/(at t 1 )
.
Integration by p a r t s gives
Since E ( M ) ( t ) xat
O(1)
for t E Cl/c,Ol
, the
last above integral
is bounded, and, moreover, f o r O s i S M we have
X
di)(-l/c) x -a/c
1 / 2 any fixed A
>
0
the r e s t r i c t i o n m
.
(9.13)
Iz
I
5 A
for
Now using Lemma 2 . 1 (where i t may be e a s i l y shown that
It I
1 Ibt(n) I n - l log3 2n
n=l
and
2
1 may be replaced by
It I s B
is uniformly bounded f o r
It I
if 5 B)
we f i n d
J.M. DE KONINCK AND A. IVI6
234 where, uniformly for
Iz(
s 1
,
R ( t , z )