Philosophy of Science. A Very Short Introduction

FREEW I LL Th o n r a rl 'l r r k FUNDAM I NTn L l 5 M MaliseRuthverr

P H I L O S O P H YO F R i l l C l O f J J a c k C o p e l a nadn d D i . r r r eP r o t r d f o o t , ' PHOTO6RAPIiY SteveEdwards

Manfredsteser

*7

PosrcoLoNlAtlsM

HABERMA5 GordonFinlayson

RobertYoung

,y''

penelopewilson posrMoDERNrsM HlERo6LypH5

/6'J

H I ROsH IMA B.R.Tomlinson Christopher Butler H U MA N EV O LU TION P OS T5TR U C TU R A LI5M BernardWood CatherineBelsey tp ? o l o c y M i c h ae| FreedenP R E H | 5ToR Y C hri sC osdenffi 4' /

H:|ilffi,:NAL

RELArroNs

// eq*/

/U

ka-ar*.t'p /

7+'ufr (

7#-f&

0^4Fo

!

)AZZ BrianMorton LlN6Ul5TlCt PeterMatthews LocKE JohnDunn MANDELA Tomlodge MEDIcALETHlcs ronyHope

THERA, Denis.lucld THERENAIS5AN(IlerryBrotton RENAIssAN(-[At{r ceraldinelohnson Howells sARTREchristina

T H EMIN D

S C H IZOP H R E N IA

,U.Va/'

f .+a;z/s'

2norro*./

-

t?:,ilff"""tff;"Ct

Q U"*r&,i,-"*@.72tfi4at

,Jonr

.I

n,

-y'.

/Va4

da

a/..,.

A.z/4

e

aaZe.)/'dc

u4 <Ja6.772J f,/ -zaz/;oc"t'r..,1.c7'a Ct'/+r'U4'f7:9a'r/;/ (f

,.275,:t-a

/'-..",' ,r),'r

,4%/u', 'rernor/A:v42, 4"4erZ"e.l r/a,9nf/;e, ),,.o.,L/" A,p,g"n/vi1 CqJ--ot11'.t/frr2,, ;.tL.r, 4o 4/f c.rzloJe/ orc

a.;rf z fihk .e 66.;JttrVJ.ozt 77-/ 'f*;*.aari

'd 'kec'*, ,ap4

.4 &*g S*{lu- { 4,y7i

uNIvERsrrYnRHss

AeaT '5o/'4 la"llc

*yylt F. -z?
4aAy'/,6*,/121_ --

\, tr,i.L#ifii:i[ri1i$*Si:,r"i".r11llfll: ry''"":r: |

ar€ objectiir fsats aboutthe probability ofone statement,givcn

i

.

I .

llven rt Hume's problcrn pmblem ts Even ifHumet is ultturatcly ultirnatcly rnsoluble, iusoluHe,as seems seemshkell', likely, tlrinkingabouttheprobltrrnisst,illilvaluableexercise.Forreflecting

cn:*)

I

another. Rejecting tlris assumption leads naturally to the srrlr.icctive interpretation of probability, but that, as we have seen,off-ersscant lrope of a satisfactory responseto Hume.

't | I

ra

/*Z/Lfj"%#:f-'"'' IZE-9!:::!=tz-:Zs-

l o g i c a n d p h i l o s o p h y.)U,-.-*.--.^,.. nfortunatel y,mostpeopl etodayli'-:::.::',,-. rel i evctl ri rt]-a)d' /e77V/ {/ 7f , - eqq. r , / a. 9. -^-. -':'^:i,.:^:::

insuperable, difrculties. Thi.s is becauseallthe attempts to rvork out

,- - t .2rypVy ""'- "'J

a g fl "e d

g an'2tzajel3:l:.-*,

.a-r'( /-at/,,u [i&J;rt"*/''la'

;+ a*

*Ie logical interpreradonofprobability facesveryseriorrs,probably

-

t+/u a t

ar'r:,& -7U

pr*o

7hT?;i-rt

-.i:;'2f*,.,, unsurprisinEry, tber€ro *,y'*.?r,f&"r{n{*Ktffi:{i"(ii*;"4;F;2

1 "**Ginfu.,/J.,.i"i".rii*"**,r,"r"-"," economistJohn Maynard Kelres, whoseearly interestswerein I \

,/

4 ttfu "7 7 2

i tfolzn5L

, t., . ,"2tr.^'t/..,th t"#q

sorve Hume's vu*. *"""* *'."o]iilffiil;:;.'f Dmbrem

na

-**Lln:

| I

the condusionhighly probable,evenifthef cannot guarantee

itstruth. itstruth'

/

$ ta /

*

g ..ar(razr

,/ aoly f/

f(t/H

> Z&ff

'b I

2*&-441j

v+R - L 1.. t.. vl{. -(7"-?r/

4 ve', 2(e/9) '" oa2 '{,y'r !1"/l/ /.r 4 c.o.E y't < tJ 4- eadJF 4* e oo) 'zr zQrhFrl f + l.n rUl*f#"

c 44 .':,+*Lrou+tu-*| ;lffi'J:i1l,T,.ii,ilH:;ll:IliJ"Tn#*J.il':r*:, r,,n^7:,* ? (e/c) > P(e/^"< (lcgror! (,t(xDtidcnc€to placcin scicnce, *tionality,tlrc pprol,rirrt(:

. l&.n-.,.'..,,t. /

4t ,,c ,, t /,. z/.?,lt/:tc.r/-Jr'Jt7.2.7

,"/ .t,.r ",,;tttn.a

:ir

:i:.# /:;!;,

r'..c$"/4c" a'/htf.+t.

t-/:-,,,"

7;s.4,-"*

/'r'' tlA 7ru-v, La..J,w,

!t! /r Md:^

z^yza;a,r4

4:.:,:4fr78?--n?:::

.!o' -,ont,,--1..,. - *u*n4 u.7/t,*

L.t

-?t,.:r"/ aa24

;,,

,''1,1,ri11,r

iili :.:,!i:t' li; . tsrj,i;,:

il,,',ii,i 1 1', r, r! , f.' :,i!'

: .1 ';i , " t l iil..i i i r , ,:t

,

of llenrpcl's accotlnt is known as the couering'lao model that will becomcclear' cxplanation,for rca^sons

Chapter 3 Explanationin science

coveringlaw modelof dxplanation Hempel's

t

'l'he basic iclcabchind the covering larv model is straightforward' given in tlempel noted that scientificexplanationsare usually questions" responseto what he called'explanation-seekingwhy perfectly 'fhese arcrfuf

17

I

iio{nd{oa) o

data that are suitabryin ig iCL :o i€ rrc

A

'= " *

philosophersacccptthis picture of sciencea^sneutraf rr.ith respectto mattersof valuc,nor the underlying fact/valrre