An INTERPRETATION of EXISTENCE
JOSEPH OWENS
CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006...
39 downloads
1021 Views
4MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
An INTERPRETATION of EXISTENCE
JOSEPH OWENS
CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006
Center for Thomistic Studies e dition 1985 Copyright© 1968 by the Bruce Publishing Company Reprinted with Permission All Rights Reserved
Aber doch eine Frage, die Frage: 1st das "Sein" ein blosses Wort und seine Bedeutung ein Dunst oder das �eistige . Schicksal .des Abendlandes? Martin Heidegger Einfiihrung in die Metaphysik, p . 28 Tiibingen, 1953 But still a question, the question: Is ''being" a mere word, and its meaning a haze or the spiritual destiny of the West? Library of C�ngress Cataloging in Publication Data Owens, Joseph. An interpretation of existence. Reprint. Originally published: Milwaukee: Bruce Pub. Co., 1968. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Ontology. I. Tide. 111'.1 84-23805 BD331.093 1985 ISBN 0-268-01157-5 (pbk.)
Manufactured in the United States of America
Contents
I II
Problem of Existence
1
Grasp of Existence
14
III
Characteristics of Existence
44
IV
Cause of Existence
73
v
Bestowal of Existence
100
VI
Meaning of Existence
127
Index
151
AN INTERPRETATION OF EXISTENCE
CHAP TER
I
Problem of Existence
When examining doctoral candidates, a philosophy professor made a point of asking two questions. He would say abruptly to the student: "If I came suddenly through the door and siud to you, 'It is green,' what information would I be giving you?" The startled candidate, if he remained cool enough to keep his mind off the "door" and the "coming in sud denly," was expected to give a conventional answer based ultimately on Aristotle's categories- he would thereby know that the thing referred to by the "it" was colored, was per ceptible, was extended in space, was present in time, was a composite of substance and accident, was different from non-green things and was the subject of many other more or less obvious relations. The examiner would then follow abruptly with the second question: "If I simply said to you, 'It is,' would I be giving you any information at all?'' This second question was meant to prove much more difficult than the first. It could trigger a reply along the gen eral lines of the well-known development given it in Par menides' poem, in which an impressive array of predicates 1
AN
2
INTERPRETATION OF EXISTENCE
from was, in recent if not too exact parlance, "unpacked" hand, the the simple assertion